alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
143157857.1 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST 

FOR NOTICE AND SERVICE OF PAPERS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Alan D. Smith, Bar No. 24964

ADSmith@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900

Seattle, WA 98101-3099

Telephone: 206.359.8000

Facsimile: 206.359.9000

Attorneys for Creditor

Puget Sound Energy, Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re

PG&E Corporation,

Debtor.

CASE NO. 19-30088

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST 

FOR NOTICE AND SERVICE OF PAPERS

TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, THE DEBTOR 

AND THEIR ATTORNEY F RECORD, AND TO ALL OTHER PARTIES IN INTEREST:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Creditor PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., by its 

attorneys, PERKINS COIE LLP, appears in this matter pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 2002 and 

9010, and Sections 102(1), 342 and 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, and requests that copies of 

all notices and pleadings given, filed, or required to be given in this case, and all papers served or 

required to be served in this case, be given to and served upon the following:

Alan D. Smith

PERKINS COIE, LLP

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900

Seattle, WA 98101-3099

Telephone: 206-359-8000

Facsimile: 206-359-9000

ADSmith@perkinscoie.com

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 225 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 11:49:01 Page 1 of 2
143157857.1 -2- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST 

FOR NOTICE AND SERVICE OF PAPERS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy 

Code, the foregoing demand includes not only the notice and papers referred to in the Rules 

specified above, but also includes, without limitation, orders and notices of any application, 

motions, petitions, pleadings, requests, complaints, demands, disclosure statements, plans of 

reorganization, and answering or reply papers whether transmitted or conveyed by mail, delivery, 

telephone, telegraph, telex or otherwise.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that neither this notice nor any later appearance, 

pleading, claim, or suit shall waive any right (2) to have final orders in non-core matters entered 

only after de novo review by a District Judge, (2) to trial by jury in any proceeding so triable in 

this case or any case, controversy, or proceeding related to this case, (3) to have the District Court 

withdraw the reference in any matter subject to recoupments to which the Landlord is or may be 

entitled under agreements, in law or in equity, all of which rights, claims, actions, defenses, 

setoffs and recoupments are expressly reserved.

DATED: February 1, 2019 PERKINS COIE LLP

By: /s/ Alan D. Smith

Alan D. Smith, Bar No. 24964

ADSmith@perkinscoie.com

Attorneys for Creditor

Puget Sound Energy, Inc.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 225 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 11:49:01 Page 2 of 2
EX-35 (d)
(logo) LLS Litton Loan Servicing

4828 Loop Central Drive
Houston TX 77081
Telephone 713-966-8966
Fax 713-218-4595
www.littonloan.com



SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

GSAMP 2006-HE8


The undersigned officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual
Statement as to Compliance as required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
for the above referenced security and certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Servicer during such preceding calendar year (or such shorter
period in the case of the first such report) and of performance under this
Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under this Agreement in all material respects for 2006, except as disclosed
below:

Reconciliations for Asset-Backed Securities Related Bank Account -
1122(d)(2)(vii)(D)

Our investor bank account reconciliations included certain reconciling items
that were not resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification
on eleven of sixty-three investor bank account reconciliations selected for
testing. The sum of the reconciling items for those eleven reconciliations was
$216,950.

Adjustments to Interest Rates for Pool Assets With Variable Rates -
1122(d)(4)(ix)

Our testing of sixty-five adjustable rate mortgages revealed two instances where
certain adjustable rate mortgages for which the interest rate reset in the
servicing system did not agree to interest rates in the appropriate source index
per the borrower's note documents. These were the result of incorrect
information transferring from the prior servicer. Additionally, the same
sixty-five mortgages selected for testing included one instance where the
adjustable rate mortgage payment change date in the servicing system did not
agree to the loan documents.


Date: February 27, 2007



/s/ Elizabeth Folk
Elizabeth Folk
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Litton Loan Servicing LP
abtl_ex1088.htm


EXHIBIT 10.88



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

AUTOBYTEL INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2001 RESTRICTED STOCK AND OPTION PLAN

 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment No. 1”), dated as of May 1, 2009, to the Autobytel Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Restricted Stock and Option Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is adopted by the Board
of Directors (the “Board”) of Autobytel Inc., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan.

 

Effective as of the date hereof, the Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 6.4(d)(ii) in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

 

“(ii) Options shall be exercisable in full or in such equal or unequal installments as the Administrator shall determine; provided that if a Participant does not purchase all of the Shares which the Participant is entitled to purchase on a certain date or within an established installment period, the Participant’s right to
purchase any unpurchased Shares shall continue during the Award Term (taking into account any early termination of such Award Term which may be provided for under this Plan).”

 

Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as in existence on the date hereof, and any reference to the Plan shall mean the Plan as amended hereby.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

 

AUTOBYTEL INC.









By: /s/ Glenn E. Fuller                                                                

Glenn E. Fuller

Its: Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and 

Administrative Officer and Secretary
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2023-2(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based onmy knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: WilmingtonTrust, National Association. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 29, 2024**
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WATSON MATHIS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2527

[ November 2, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Laurie E. Buchanan

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 472006CF000469A

.

Watson Mathis, Mayo, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., G ROSS and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-45: OTS No. H-4715]

                    Notice is hereby given that on May 14, 2010, the Office of Thrift Supervision approved the application of Peoples Federal MHC and Peoples Federal Savings Bank, Brighton, Massachusetts, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Northeast Regional Office, Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, NJ 07311.                

Dated: May 26, 2010.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-13213 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
#### STATE v. OTIS TROGDON and DWIGHT TROGDON.

(Filed 30 December, 1929.)

Criminal Daw G c — Where defendant does not offer character evidence, evidence of his bad character affects only his credibility.

AVhere a defendant in a criminal action testifies in his own behalf, but offers no evidence as to his character, the State may offer evidence of his bad character, but such evidence affects only his credibility as a witness, and an instruction that such evidence might be taken as substantive evidence of guilt will be held for reversible error.

CeimiNal action, before *MacRaie, Special Judge,*at April Special Term, 1929, of Randolph.

Tbe defendants were indicted and convicted of secret assault witb intent to kill. Each defendant was sentenced to serve a term of twenty years in tbe State prison.

From tbe judgment pronounced tbe defendants appealed.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*Hammer & Wilson and M.oser & Barnes for defendants.*

Per Curiam.

Neither of tbe defendants offered evidence as to bis good character. Tbe State, however, offered evidence of tbe bad character of defendants.

Tbe trial judge charged tbe jury as follows: “Tbe defendants took tbe stand in their behalf, and you may consider any evidence tending to show their character to be bad as substantive evidence; tbat is tending to indicate or show tbat they committed tbe acts witb which they are charged. As to Mr. Myers and Mrs. Myers, testimony showing tbat *168their character is good may be considered by you as affecting their credibility. Because a person’s character is proven to be bad it should not always lead the jury to believe that person would swear falsely. The fact that a person’s character is proven to be good neither does it follow from such testimony that that person would always speak the truth; but character evidence may be taken and weighed by the jury in connection with the credibility of the witness. And in case of defendants charged with a crime, where the defendants’ character has been placed in issue, where the defendants take the stand have placed their character at issue, evidence tending to show that their character is bad is to be received by the jury, not only as relating to their credibility, but as substantive evidence, tending to show whether or not they committed the offense with which they are charged.”

The foregoing instruction was erroneous, and the defendants are entitled to a new trial. *S. v. Idol,*195 N. C., 497, 142 S. E., 588; *S. v. Mike Roberson,*197 N. C., 657.

New trial.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

.

Heinz Binder (SBN 87908)

Robert G. Harris (SBN 124678)

BINDER & MALTER, LLP

2775 Park Avenue

Santa Clara, CA 95050

Tel: (408) 295-1700

Fax: (408) 295-1531

Email: Heinz@bindermalter.com

Email: Rob@bindermalter.com

Attorneys for TURN, The Utility Reform Network

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors.

Case Nos. 19-30088 DM (Lead Case)

 19-30089 DM

Chapter 11

Jointly Administered 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☒ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case 

No. 19-30088 DM.

Date: July 24, 2019

Time: 9:30 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 17

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, California 

DKT # 2741

OBJECTION DEADLINE: July 16, 2019

JOINDER BY TURN IN MOTION BY AD HOC COMMITTEE OF SENIOR UNSECURED 

NOTEHOLDERS TO TERMINATE THE EXCLUSIVE PERIODS PURSUANT TO 

BANKRUPTCY CODE SECTION 1121(D)(1) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2918 Filed: 07/10/19 Entered: 07/10/19 12:55:16 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 .

The Utility Reform Network (“TURN”) hereby joins in the Motion by Ad Hoc Committee of 

Senior Unsecured Noteholders to Terminate the Exclusive Periods Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code 

Section 1121(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Motion”) and asks that the Court immediately 

terminate the Debtors’ exclusive right to file and seek acceptances of a plan. 

TURN does not, at this time, explicitly or implicitly endorse the plan construct described by 

the Senior Unsecured Noteholders in the Motion. What is notable is that the Senior Unsecured 

Noteholders are proposing a substantial influx of new capital to address the many needs of the 

Debtors and creditors with a neutral impact on ratepayers going forward. By contrast, all reports are 

that the Debtors and stockholders would shift to others the risk and responsibility for corporate 

malfeasance and criminality with little or no impact on their own positions.

TURN believes that competing plans will ultimately yield the best possible result for 

ratepayers and creditors, supports the Motion, and respectfully requests that this Court grant it.

Dated: July 10, 2019 BINDER & MALTER, LLP

By: /s/ Robert G. Harris 

Robert G. Harris

 Attorneys for TURN, the Utility Reform Network 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2918 Filed: 07/10/19 Entered: 07/10/19 12:55:16 Page 2 of

2
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 0547 V

Filed: March 18, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

LAURA STEELE

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Edward M. Kraus, Law Offices of Chicago Kent, Chicago, IL , for petitioner.

Jeffrey T. Sprague , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On April 16, 2018

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of an influenza vaccine received in her left arm on

October 13, 2016 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit

of the Office of Special Masters.

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasio n of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 N ational Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa (2012 ).On March 15, 2019

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that petitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent agrees that petitioner has no history of pain,

inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder; pain occurred within 48 hours after the

flu vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified

to explain petitioner ’ s shoulder pain. Id. at 4 . Respondent further agrees that petitioner

suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months and has satisfied

all legal prereq uisites for compensation under the Act

. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the

undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
#### Julia Kammerer, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company, Appellant.

—Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

All concur.
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

 

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “Administrative Agent”), dohereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the“Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer, and theAdministrative Agent the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WAMU Series 2007-HY1 Trust for the 2007 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”): 

1.                  A review of the activities of the AdministrativeAgent during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,the Administrative Agent has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 

| /s/ Barbara Campbell Name:  Barbara Campbell Title:    First Vice President |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Bernard Schaeffer v. Henry Erlenmayer and Others.

This motion is for Poughkeepsie. We cannot, therefore, grant the motion.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2515 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 16:01:41 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2515 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 16:01:41 Page 2 of

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745379
<NAME> KENAN TRANSPORT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,129
<PP&E>                                          74,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,096
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,201
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,979
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,786
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2087    Filed: 05/20/19    Entered: 05/20/19 13:33:13    Page 1 of3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2087    Filed: 05/20/19    Entered: 05/20/19 13:33:13    Page 2 of3

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2087    Filed: 05/20/19    Entered: 05/20/19 13:33:13    Page 3 of3