alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2236

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Antonio Triplett, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 1, 2001 Filed: November 5, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Antonio Triplett appeals his conviction, upon his guilty plea, for possessing with intent to distribute more than five grams of cocaine base. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(iii) (1994). The District Court 1 sentenced him to 200 months' imprisonment and four years' supervised release. Triplett’s counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Triplett has filed a “Motion to Withdraw, With Prejudice, the Impending Direct Appeal,” in which he argues his plea was coerced, he did not know the nature of the charge or that the-2- sentence he received could be imposed, he did not receive the sentence concessions contemplated by his plea agreement, and his counsel was ineffective. We do not believe that Triplett actually wishes to forego his right to appeal, and thus we will liberally construe his motion as a pro se supplemental brief. Any complaints Triplett has about his counsel’s performance should be presented in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, seeUnited States v. Cain , 134 F.3d 1345, 1352 (8th Cir. 1998), and he cannot claim on appeal that his guilty plea was involuntary after declining to move to withdraw his plea in the District Court, cf. United States v. Bond , 135 F.3d 1247, 1249 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (holding that this court need not address guilty-plea claim which defendant withdrew at sentencing hearing), cert. denied , 524 U.S. 961 (1998). Triplett was adequately advised of the nature of the charge and the sentence he could receive, and his sentence did not violate his plea agreement. Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (1), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

HOLDREGE AND KULL 

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

HOLDREGE AND KULL

792 SEARLS AVE

NEVADA CITY, CA 95959

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: July 1, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F $20,941.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2808 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 14:21:42 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2808 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 14:21:42 Page 2 of

2
#### Nathan Neufeld, Impleaded, etc., v. Edward Moll et al.

*Creditors' Bills—Trust Fund.*

Upon a creditor’s bill, based upon several judgments against a corporation named, this court declines to interfere with a decree charging defendant with the value of certain assets, and requiring him to prorate with the complainants herein.

[Opinion filed January 16, 1891.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Blum *&*Blum, for appellants.

Messrs. Hofheimer *&*Zeisler, for appellees.

Gaby, J.

The appellees are all the creditors, except the real owner of the judgment hereinafter mentioned, of the Rochester Boot and Shoe Manufacturing Company, a defunct corporation, of which the appellant was president.

On the 13th day of October, 1888, the property of the company, which the decree finds then to have been of the value of $1,050, the truth of which finding is not questioned, was sold for $350 to one Wolf, nominally, under an execution in his favor. The only real question in the case, is, whether the money which was loaned to the company, for which the judgment on which the execution issued was entered, was the money of the appellant, or of Wolf, his father-in-law, and which of them was the real purchaser under the execution.

Upon that question the evidence justifies the finding that it was the money of the appellant, and that he was the real purchaser.

Under the doctrine of Beach v. Miller, 130 Ill. 162, the Circuit Court rightly charged the appellant with the value of the *536assets, and required him to prorate with the appellees, so that all creditors, the appellant and the appellees, get equally eighty-one per cent of their dues.

The fact that some of the money for which that judgment was entered was paid to the appellees in reduction of their demands, did not take the case, when the wreck came, out of the doctrine of the case cited. The decree is affirmed.

*Decree affirmed.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1800

HUO YING LIEN,

Petitioner,

v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: January 7, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Huo Ying Lien, Petitioner Pro Se. Javier Balasquide, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Arlington, Virginia; Brianne Whelan Cohen, Trial Attorney, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washin gton, D.C.; George William Maugans, III, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Huo Ying Lien, a native and citizen of China,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the Immigration
Judge’s decision dismissing her applications for relief from

removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and Lien’s
claims and find no error in the agency decisions. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1208.10 (2008). We accordingly deny the petition for review
for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Lien (B.I.A.
June 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         9066768
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               3041360
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   76489668
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         3278353
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           3338123
<LOANS>                                       98149651
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1989448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               197371375
<DEPOSITS>                                   172032484
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3299600
<LONG-TERM>                                     110000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5062875
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               197371375
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6615487
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4412569
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              11028056
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4020343
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4238189
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          6789867
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    90000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2512679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2368630
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1678630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        279
<LOANS-PAST>                                       160
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1989448
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      125
<RECOVERIES>                                       146
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Arctic Research Commission

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission will hold its 93rd meeting in Washington, DC, on June 2-3, 2010. The business session, open to the public, will convene June 3 at 8:30 a.m.

*The Agenda items include:*

(1) Call to order and approval of the agenda.

(2) Approval of the minutes from the 92nd meeting.

(3) Commissioners and staff reports.

(4) Discussion and presentations concerning Arctic research activities.

The focus of the meeting will be reports and updates on programs and research projects affecting the Arctic.

If you plan to attend this meeting, please notify us via the contact information below. Any person planning to attend who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission of those needs in advance of the meeting.

*Contact person for further information:*                     John Farrell, Executive Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-0090.                

John Farrell,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2010-12712 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5041 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5041

   To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling up to 
  $5,000,000 for information on the kidnapping and murder of Naftali 
Fraenkel, a dual United States-Israeli citizen, that began on June 12, 
                                 2014.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2014

  Mr. Lamborn (for himself and Mr. Sherman) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling up to 
  $5,000,000 for information on the kidnapping and murder of Naftali 
Fraenkel, a dual United States-Israeli citizen, that began on June 12, 
                                 2014.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Rewards for Justice program 
authorized under section 36(b) of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State 
shall offer a reward to any individual who furnishes information 
leading to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 
for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or aiding or 
abetting in the commission of the kidnapping and murder of Naftali 
Fraenkel.
    (b) Limit on Total Rewards.--The total amount of rewards offered 
under subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*United States Trust Company, as Committee, etc., v. Edward P. Barker and others, Commissioners, etc.

— Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the petition dismissed, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 504 

To save at least $10,000,000,000 by consolidating some duplicative and 

overlapping Government programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2013 

Mr. CULBERSON (for himself, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. MCKINLEY, 

and Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 

and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To save at least $10,000,000,000 by consolidating some 

duplicative and overlapping Government programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONSOLIDATING UNNECESSARY DUPLICATIVE 

4 AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENT PRO5 GRAMS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later 

7 than 150 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 

8 the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 504 IH

1 shall coordinate with the heads of the relevant department 

2 and agencies to— 

3 (1) use available administrative authority to 

4 eliminate, consolidate, or streamline Government 

5 programs and agencies with duplicative and overlap6 ping missions identified in— 

7 (A) the February 2012 Government Ac8 countability Office report to Congress, entitled 

9 ‘‘Opportunities to Reduce Duplication, Overlap 

10 and Fragmentation, Achieve Savings, and En11 hance Revenue’’ (GAO–12–342SP); and 

12 (B) the March 2011 Government Account13 ability Office report to Congress, entitled ‘‘Op14 portunities to Reduce Potential Duplication in 

15 Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and 

16 Enhance Revenue’’ (GAO–11–318SP) and 

17 apply the savings towards deficit reduction; 

18 (2) identify and report to Congress any legisla19 tive changes required to further eliminate, consoli20 date, or streamline Government programs and agen21 cies with duplicative and overlapping missions identi22 fied in— 

23 (A) the February 2012 Government Ac24 countability Office report to Congress, entitled 

25 ‘‘Opportunities to Reduce Duplication, Overlap 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 504 IH

1 and Fragmentation, Achieve Savings, and En2 hance Revenue’’ (GAO–12–342SP); and 

3 (B) the March 2011 Government Account4 ability Office report to Congress, entitled ‘‘Op5 portunities to Reduce Potential Duplication in 

6 Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and 

7 Enhance Revenue’’ (GAO–11–318SP); 

8 (3) determine the total cost savings that shall 

9 result to each agency, office, and department from 

10 the actions described in paragraph (1); and 

11 (4) rescind from the appropriate accounts the 

12 amount greater of— 

13 (A) $10,000,000,000; or 

14 (B) the total amount of cost savings esti15 mated by paragraph (3). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 475 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2013 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

vaccines against seasonal influenza within the definition 

of taxable vaccines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 475 RDS

1 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF VACCINES AGAINST SEASONAL 

2 INFLUENZA TO LIST OF TAXABLE VACCINES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (N) of section 

4 4132(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

5 amended by inserting ‘‘or any other vaccine against sea6 sonal influenza’’ before the period. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

8 (1) SALES, ETC.—The amendment made by this 

9 section shall apply to sales and uses on or after the 

10 later of— 

11 (A) the first day of the first month which 

12 begins more than 4 weeks after the date of the 

13 enactment of this Act, or 

14 (B) the date on which the Secretary of 

15 Health and Human Services lists any vaccine 

16 against seasonal influenza (other than any vac17 cine against seasonal influenza listed by the 

18 Secretary prior to the date of the enactment of 

19 this Act) for purposes of compensation for any 

20 vaccine-related injury or death through the Vac21 cine Injury Compensation Trust Fund. 

22 (2) DELIVERIES.—For purposes of paragraph 

23 (1) and section 4131 of the Internal Revenue Code 

24 of 1986, in the case of sales on or before the effec25 tive date described in such paragraph for which deVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:42 Jun 20, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H475.RDS H475

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 475 RDS

1 livery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 

2 be considered the sale date. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 18, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jason Henry Lathe v. Rachel Lizabeth Lathe

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 936

- CV

Trial court case number: 17

- 0 3

- 0243

- CVA

Trial court: County Court of Atascosa County

Appellant, Jason Henry Lathe, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s judgment, signed on September 17, 2018. On November 29, 2018, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the court reporter responsible for preparing the report er’s

record had not filed a reporter’s record because appellant had not paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparation of the reporter’s record. On December 31, 2018, appellant’s counsel notified the Clerk that he had paid the fee “on or about December 18, 2018.” However, a court reporter’s record has not been filed in this appeal. Accordingly

, the reporter’s record is due to be filed no later than 30 days of

the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3( b )

, ( c ).

Appellant has filed a Mo tion to Suspend Briefing Deadline or the Alternat ive Appellant’s Third M otion for E xtension. Because the appellate record is not complete, appellant’s brief is not yet due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 4

. 1, 38.6(a) . Appellant’s motion

, therefore, is dismissed a s moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ May 14, 2019

____________________
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2330    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 10:40:45    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2330    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 10:40:45    Page 2 of2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James Hayward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                           /s/  JAMES A. HAYWARD
                                           ----------------------------
                                           James A. Hayward
                                           Principal Financial Officer
                                           February 20, 2007
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARK D. WALKER,

Appellant,

v.

TAKELYA L. WALKER,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00029

- CV

Appeal from the

426th District Court

of Bell County, Texas

(TC#294,292A)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the trial court’s judgment

should be affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part. We affirm the trial court’s order on

all issues not related to the inte rest rate set on the judgment against Appellant for the child support

arrearage owed to Appellee

. W e reverse the trial court’s order that 12% interest be applied to the

child support arrearage and remand the cause to the trial court for consideration of th e amount of

interest to be included in the judgment consistent with the terms of this decision.

We further order that Appellee recovers from Appellant and his sureties, if any, for

performance of the judg ment and all costs, for which let execution issue. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.5.

This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley

, JJ.