1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Keller & Benvenutti LLP 650 California Street, Suite 1900 San Francisco, CA 94108

EXHIBIT A

Additional Stipulations

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 1

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice)

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com)

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice)

(ray.schrock@weil.com)

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice)

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice)

(matthew.goren@weil.com)|

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Tel: 212 310 8000

Fax: 212 310 8007

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP

Tobias S. Keller (#151445)

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com)

Jane Kim (#298192)

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com)

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

Tel: 415 496 6723

Fax: 650 636 9251

Attorneys for Debtors

and Debtors in Possession

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19 -30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

STIPULATION CONSENTING TO 

EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO 

ASSUME OR REJECT CERTAIN 

NONRESIDENTIAL REAL 

PROPERTY LEASES PURSUANT 

TO 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(4)

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 2

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

PG&E Corporation (“PG&E Corp”) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the 

“Utility”, and together the “Debtors”) as debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned 

chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), and the City and County of San Francisco, on behalf of 

itself and all of its agencies, departments, or instrumentalities through which it acts or does 

business (collectively, “San Francisco”) hereby submit this stipulation (the “Stipulation”) 

consenting to a further extension of time for the Debtors to assume or reject unexpired leases of 

nonresidential real property pursuant to section 365(d)(4)(B)(ii) of title 11 of the United States 

Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), and represent and agree as follows:

RECITALS

A. On January 29, 2019 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtors commenced the 

Chapter 11 Cases in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California (the 

“Bankruptcy Court”).

B. Debtors and San Francisco are parties to numerous agreements and Debtors 

hold numerous permits issued by departments within San Francisco that allow the Utility to access 

certain property owned by San Francisco for various purposes, including, but not limited to, 

environmental mitigation and remediation; underground and overhead equipment installation; and 

maintenance, replacement, and repair of facilities (collectively, the “Agreements/Permits”). These 

Agreements/Permits involve several departments of San Francisco, including the Port of San 

Francisco, the San Francisco Department of Public Works, San Francisco International Airport, and 

the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. 

C. By Order dated May 23, 2019 [Docket No. 2227], the Bankruptcy Court 

extended the time for the Debtors to assume or reject nonresidential real property leases to August

27, 2019 pursuant to section 365(d)(4)(B)(i) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

D. The Debtors propose to seek a further extension of time for the Debtors to 

reject or assume nonresidential real property leases from the Bankruptcy Court. Such an order 

requires the written consent of San Francisco pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(4)(B)(ii) to the extent 

that any of the Agreements/Permits constitute nonresidential real property leases.

E. Neither the Debtors nor San Francisco admit that the Agreements/Permits are

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 3

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

nonresidential real property leases subject to assumption under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code 

or the deadline to assume or reject such nonresidential real property leases in section 365(d)(4) of 

the Bankruptcy Code. For the avoidance of doubt, and without any prejudice to either the Debtors 

or San Francisco, to the extent any of the Agreements/Permits constitute nonresidential real 

property leases, San Francisco consents to the extension of time to assume or reject such 

Agreements/Permits as further set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, UPON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, IT IS HEREBY 

STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THE 

UNDERSIGNED, AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY REQUEST THAT THE COURT ORDER 

THAT:

1. San Francisco consents to, and this Stipulation hereby constitutes “prior 

written consent of the lessor,” as required by section 365(d)(4)(B)(ii) of the Bankruptcy Code, for 

an extension or extensions (the “Extension”) to the time within which a Debtor must assume any 

nonresidential real property lease to which it and San Francisco are party, including any of the 

Agreements/Permits which constitute nonresidential real property leases (the “Leases”), until the 

earlier of (i) the expiration of the term of each of the Leases, or (ii) the effective date of a 

reorganization plan for the Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases (the “Extended Deadline”).

2. Pursuant to section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, the time period within 

which the Debtors must assume or reject the Leases is extended from August 27, 2019 through and 

including the Extended Deadline.

3. No further consent of San Francisco shall be required for the sole purpose of 

granting the Extension, and the consent granted pursuant to this Stipulation is without prejudice to 

the Debtors’ right to seek further extensions as provided in section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy 

Code, including beyond the Extended Deadline. 

4. Nothing contained in this Stipulation or any actions taken by the Debtors or 

San Francisco pursuant to relief consented to herein is intended or should be construed as: (a) an 

admission as to the validity or amount of any particular claim against the Debtors; (b) a waiver of 

the Debtors’ rights to dispute any particular claim on any grounds; (c) a promise or requirement to 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 4

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

pay any particular claim; (d) an admission by the Debtors or San Francisco that any of the 

Agreements/Permits, are executory contracts or unexpired leases, as applicable; (e) a waiver or 

limitation of the Debtors’ rights under the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law, including 

the Debtors’ right to assume, reject, and/or seek any other related relief with respect to any contract 

or lease; or (f) an alteration, amendment, or other modification of the terms of the 

Agreements/Permits. 

5. This Stipulation may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which 

shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

6. The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the 

relief granted pursuant to and in accordance with this Stipulation.

7. The terms and conditions of this Stipulation shall be immediately effective 

and enforceable upon its entry.

8. The Bankruptcy Court retains sole and exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the 

provisions of this Stipulation.

Dated: August 22, 2019 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP

By: /s/ Jane Kim

Jane Kim

Attorneys for Debtors

and Debtors in Possession

Dated: August 22, 2019 GREENE RADOVSKY MALONEY SHARE & 

HENNIGH LLP

By: /s/ Edward J. Tredinnick 

Edward J. Tredinnick

Attorneys for City and County of San 

Francisco, including all of its agencies, 

departments, or instrumentalities.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 5

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 6

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 7

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 8

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 9

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 10

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 11

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 12

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 13

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 14

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119

EXHIBIT A 

Name of Lessor: Dana Butcher, as receiver 

Address: 275 South Madera, Suite 302 

 Kerman, CA 93630 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 15

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 16

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 17

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 18

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 19

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 20

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com)| 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: 212 310 8000 

Fax: 212 310 8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: 415 496 6723 

Fax: 650 636 9251 

Attorneys for Debtors 

and Debtors in Possession 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19 -30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

STIPULATION CONSENTING TO 

EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO 

ASSUME OR REJECT CERTAIN 

NONRESIDENTIAL REAL 

PROPERTY LEASES PURSUANT 

TO 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(4) 

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 21

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119

PG&E Corporation (“PG&E Corp”) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the 

“Utility”, and together the “Debtors”) as debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned 

chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), and the lessor (the “Lessor”) of the real property 

listed in Exhibit A, hereby submit this stipulation (the “Stipulation”) consenting to a further 

extension of time for the Debtors to assume or reject unexpired leases of nonresidential real 

property pursuant to section 365(d)(4)(B)(ii) of title 11 of the United States Code (the 

“Bankruptcy Code”), and represent and agree as follows: 

RECITALS 

A. On January 29, 2019 (the “Petition Date”), the Debtors commenced the 

Chapter 11 Cases in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California (the 

“Bankruptcy Court”). 

B. By Order dated May 23, 2019 [Docket No. 2227], the Bankruptcy Court 

extended the time for the Debtors to assume or reject nonresidential real property leases to August 

27, 2019 pursuant to section 365(d)(4)(B)(i) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

C. The Debtors propose to seek a further extension of time for the Debtors to 

reject or assume nonresidential real property leases from the Bankruptcy Court. Such an order 

requires the written consent of the Lessor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(4)(B)(ii). 

D. The Lessor agrees to provide the Debtors with such consent. 

NOW, THEREFORE, UPON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, IT IS HEREBY 

STIPULATED AND AGREED, BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, THROUGH THE 

UNDERSIGNED, AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY REQUEST THAT THE COURT ORDER 

THAT: 

1. The Lessor consents to, and this Stipulation hereby constitutes “prior written 

consent of the lessor,” as required by section 365(d)(4)(B)(ii) of the Bankruptcy Code, for an 

extension or extensions (the “Extension”) to the time within which a Debtor must assume any 

nonresidential real property lease to which it and the Lessor are a party (the “Leases”), until the 

earlier of (i) the expiration of the term of each of the Leases, or (ii) the effective date of a 

reorganization plan for the Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases (the “Extended Deadline”). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 22

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119

2. Pursuant to section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, the time period within 

which the Debtors must assume or reject the Leases is extended from August 27, 2019 through and 

including the Extended Deadline. 

3. No further consent of Lessor shall be required for the sole purpose of 

granting the Extension, and the consent granted pursuant to this Stipulation is without prejudice to 

the Debtors’ right to seek further extensions as provided in section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy 

Code, including beyond the Extended Deadline. 

4. Nothing contained in this Stipulation or any actions taken by the Debtors 

pursuant to relief consented to herein is intended or should be construed as: (a) an admission as to 

the validity or amount of any particular claim against the Debtors; (b) a waiver of the Debtors’ 

rights to dispute any particular claim on any grounds; (c) a promise or requirement to pay any 

particular claim; (d) an admission by the Debtors that any contract or lease, including the Leases, 

are executory or unexpired, as applicable; (e) a waiver or limitation of the Debtors’ rights under 

the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law, including the Debtors’ right to assume, reject, 

and/or seek any other related relief with respect to any contract or lease; or (f) an alteration, 

amendment, or other modification of the terms of the Leases. 

5. This Stipulation may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which 

shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

6. The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the 

relief granted pursuant to and in accordance with this Stipulation. 

7. The terms and conditions of this Stipulation shall be immediately effective 

and enforceable upon its entry. 

8. The Bankruptcy Court retains sole and exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the 

provisions of this Stipulation. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 23

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119

EXECUTION PAGE 

Dated: August 9, 2019 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

By: /s/ Jane Kim 

Jane Kim 

Attorneys for Debtors 

and Debtors in Possession 

Dated: August 14, 2019 LESSOR 

By: /s/ Michael P. Esser 

Michael P. Esser 

Attorneys for Lessor 

Kirkland & Ellis LLP 

555 California Street 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 24

of 47
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119

EXHIBIT A 

Name of Lessor: O.L.S. Energy-Agnews, Inc. 

Address: 3800 Cisco Way 

 San Jose, CA 95134 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 25

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 26

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 27

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 28

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 29

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 30

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 31

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 32

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 33

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 34

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 35

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 36

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 37

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 38

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 39

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 40

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 41

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 42

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 43

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 44

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 45

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 46

of 47
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3678-1 Filed: 08/23/19 Entered: 08/23/19 15:26:44 Page 47

of 47