alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 USC, as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Wound Healing and Biofilms.                    

*Date:*                         June 18, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Meredith D. Temple-O'Connor, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12C, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2772,                         *templeocm@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 25, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-13036 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3056-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:01:17 Page 1

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3056-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:01:17 Page 2

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3056-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:01:17 Page 3

of 4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3056-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:01:17 Page 4

of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4919 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4919

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 715 Shawan Falls Drive in Dublin, Ohio, as the ``Lance Corporal 
    Wesley G. Davids and Captain Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL WESLEY G. DAVIDS AND CAPTAIN NICHOLAS J. 
              ROZANSKI MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 715 Shawan Falls Drive in Dublin, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lance Corporal Wesley G. Davids and Captain 
Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Wesley G. Davids and Captain Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial 
Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

LOS ANGELES

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469) 

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 628.208.6434 

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496) 

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

11601 Wilshire Boulevard

Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

Telephone: 310.820.8800 

Facsimile: 310.820.8859 

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

□ Affects PG& E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY ELIZABETH A. GREEN 

PRO HAC VICE

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3168 Filed: 07/24/19 Entered: 07/24/19 11:18:06 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3168 Filed: 07/24/19 Entered: 07/24/19 11:18:06 Page 2 of

2
SCPW-15-0000952

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

PAUL KAUKA CULLEN, also known as PAUL KAUKA NAKI, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE ADRIANNE N. HEELY, JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT 

OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, MOLOKA#I DIVISION, STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent Judge,

and

RICHARD P. PERREIRA and GWENDOLYN H. PERREIRA, Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(DC CIVIL NO. 13-1-0122)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Paul Kauka Cullen’s

petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on December 24, 2015, the

documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and

the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that

he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief or

a lack of alternative means to seek relief at this time. 

Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to a writ of mandamus. 

See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999)

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-15-0000952

20-JAN-2016

01:09 PM
(a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not

issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable

right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress

adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 20, 2016. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND , TEXAS JUDGMENT
Richard Efren Hignojos
, * From the 244 th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. C

- 38,608

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00264

- CR * September 30, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Reorganized Debtors. 

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Liz Santodomingo, do declare and state as follows: 

1. I am employed by Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC (“Kroll”)1, the claims and 

noticing agent for the Reorganized Debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On September 1, 2022, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Kroll 

caused the following document to be served via first class mail on the Affected Claimants Service 

List attached hereto, as Exhibit A. 

 Order Re Supplemental Exhibit to Order Consolidating Motions to File Late Claims 

[Docket No. 12923] 

3. I have reviewed the Notices of Electronic Filing (NEF) for the above-listed document, and 

I understand that parties listed in each NEF as having received notice through electronic mail were 

electronically served with that document through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system. 

4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that the 

foregoing is true and correct and that if called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify 

thereto. 

1

 Effective March 29, 2022, Prime Clerk LLC changed its name to Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12977 Filed: 09/20/22 Entered: 09/20/22 06:55:01 Page 1

of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 SRF 63815 

Executed this 13th day of September 2022, at New York, NY. 

/s/ Liz Santodomingo

Liz Santodomingo

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12977 Filed: 09/20/22 Entered: 09/20/22 06:55:01 Page 2

of 4
Exhibit A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12977 Filed: 09/20/22 Entered: 09/20/22 06:55:01 Page 3

of 4
Exhibit A

Affected Claimants Service List

Served via First Class Mail

NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE POSTAL CODE

Blank, Ashley Address on File

Carrillo, Craig C. Address on File

Dale Smithson, et al Address on File

Fife, Jerome Jay Address on File

Fife, Melissa Ryan Address on File

Kangrga, Nikola Address on File

Luther, Janae Address on File

Miller, Jennifer Address on File

Miller, Jewel Address on File

Neff, Randal Address on File

Wallach, Sequoyah Address on File

Yanez, Efrain Address on File

In re: PG&E Corporation, et al.

Case No. 19-30088 Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12977 Filed: 09/20/22 Entered: 09/20/22 06:55:01 Page 4

of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,131,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (72,480)
<INVENTORY>                                    125,662
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,907
<PP&E>                                       4,282,050
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,758,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,992,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,628,823
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,102,947
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,864,075)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,992,220
<SALES>                                      2,725,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,788,464
<CGS>                                        1,675,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,675,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             94,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1159

HENRY T. SANDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

IN RE: ______ PETITIONER THE HONORABLE DEBORAH

K. CHASANOW,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-1573

HENRY T. SANDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

IN RE: ______ PETITIONER THE HONORABLE DEBORAH

K. CHASANOW,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA95-3886-PJM)
2

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: August 2, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

No. 96-1159 affirmed and No. 96-1573 dismissed by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

Henry T. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In No. 96-1159, Appellant appeals from the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court in No. 96-1159. Sanders v. Chasanow, No. CA-95-3886-

PJM (D. Md. Jan. 17, 1996).

Appellant also appeals from the district court's order denying

a plethora of motions filed after the dismissal of his § 1983

action. Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal

period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an

extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day

period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to

relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established

by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v.

Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting

United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The order was

entered on February 23, 1996. Appellant's notice of appeal was

filed on April 11, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension for the appeal period deprives this

court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss

the appeal in No. 96-1573.

We deny all of Appellant's outstanding motions, including his

motions for writ of mandamus, to stay, for bail pending appeal, for

expedited treatment, for sanctions, for default judgment, and to

dismiss. We further deny Appellant's motions for transfer, correc-
4

tion or modification of the record, for declaratory or injunctive

relief, for conference, to treat his affidavit as a brief, to

remand, for injunction, for hearing in banc, for prehearing conference. We also deny his motions to amend, for assignment, for judicial notice, for restoration of the argument calendar, for an order

of contempt, for a show cause order, for special sessions, for an

answer, and for affirmation of relief. Because these appeals have

been consolidated, we deny Appellant's motion to consolidate as

moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 96-1159 - AFFIRMED

No. 96-1573 - DISMISSED
EXHBIT 99(i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Bradford,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.




/s/ Mark D. Bradford
--------------------------------------

Mark D. Bradford
President, Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
November 13, 2002


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
##### 



Exhibit 10.23
 PACKETEER, INC.
NOTICE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
(For Nonemployee Directors)
  Award   Plan 
 Participant:
    
    
    
    
    
    ID:Grant Date:
    
    
    
    
    
    Grant No.:Number of
Restricted Stock
Units:
    
    , subject to adjustment as provided by the Restricted
Stock Units Agreement.Settlement Date:
    
    For each Restricted Stock Unit, except as otherwise
provided by the Restricted Stock Units Agreement, the date
on which such unit becomes a Vested Unit in accordance
with the vesting schedule set forth below.Vested Units:
    
    Except as provided by the Restricted Stock Units Agreement
and provided that the Participants Service has not
terminated prior to the relevant date, the number of
Vested Units shall cumulatively increase on each
respective date set forth below by the number of units set
forth opposite such date, as follows:
 Vesting Date
    
    Number of Units Vesting
  PACKETEER, INC.
    
    
    
    PARTICIPANTBy:SignatureIts:DateAddress:
    
    10201 North de Anza BoulevardCupertino, CA 95014, USA
    
    
    
    Address
 ATTACHMENTS:
    
    1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended to the Grant Date; Restricted Stock Units
Agreement and Plan Prospectus




---



##### 



PACKETEER, INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS AGREEMENT
(For Nonemployee Directors)
 Notice of Grant of Restricted
Stock Units  Grant Notice   Agreement   Units   Plan   Plan
Prospectus 
 1. Definitions and Construction.
 Definitions .
 Construction .
 2. Administration.
  3. The Award.
 Grant of Units.




---



##### 



No Monetary Payment Required.
 4. Vesting of Units.
 Regular Vesting.
 Vesting Upon Death or Permanent Disability.
 5. Corporation Reacquisition Right.
  6. Settlement of the Award.
 Issuance of Shares of Common Stock .
 Beneficial Ownership of Shares; Certificate Registration .
 Restrictions on Grant of the Award and Issuance of Shares .
 2




---



##### 



Fractional Shares .
 7. Tax Withholding.
 In General.
 Withholding in Shares.
 8. Effect of Corporate Transaction or Change in Control on Award.
  9. Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure.
  3




---



##### 



10. Rights as a Stockholder.
  11. Legends.
  12. Miscellaneous Provisions.
 Termination or Amendment.
 Nontransferability of the Award.
 Further Instruments.
 4




---



##### 



Binding Effect.
 Delivery of Documents and Notices.
 Description of Electronic Delivery .
 Consent to Electronic Delivery.
 Integrated Agreement.
 5




---



##### 



Applicable Law.
 Counterparts.
 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2783 Filed: 06/28/19 Entered: 06/28/19 10:22:38 Page 1 of

1
#### Joseph Diebolt, Respondent, v. Hugh J. Jewett, as Receiver, etc., Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Bradley, J.;

Barker, J., not sitting.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2727 Filed: 06/24/19 Entered: 06/24/19 11:47:53 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2727 Filed: 06/24/19 Entered: 06/24/19 11:47:53 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2727 Filed: 06/24/19 Entered: 06/24/19 11:47:53 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2727 Filed: 06/24/19 Entered: 06/24/19 11:47:53 Page 4 of

4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                          13,215
<SECURITIES>                                     9,105
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                       800
<INVENTORY>                                     35,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,814
<PP&E>                                         105,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,673
<BONDS>                                          7,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           789
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,569
<SALES>                                         50,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,568
<CGS>                                           40,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (280)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,856
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
#### Margaret F. Holmes, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion.

Jenks, P: J.,. Burr, Thomas and .Carr, JJ., concurred; Woodward, J., dissented.