alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

JOINDER 

. 

 

Rita M. Liotta (SBN 152823) 

United States Navy 

1 Avenue of the Palms, Suite 161 

San Francisco, CA 94130 

Tel: (415) 743-4718 

Fax: (415) 743-4700 

Email: rita.liotta@navy.mil 

Attorney for the Federal Executive Agencies 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re 

PG&E CORPORATION 

and 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

Case Nos. 19-30088 DM (Lead Case) 

 19-30089 DM 

Chapter 11 

Jointly Administered 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

☒ Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case 

No. 19-30088 DM. 

Date: May 8, 2019 

Time: 9:30 a.m. 

Place: Courtroom 17 

 450 Golden Gate Avenue 

 San Francisco, California 

 

DKT # 1324 

OBJECTION DEADLINE: April 24, 2019 

JOINDER IN MOTION BY TURN FOR APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF RATEPAYERS PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 1102(a)(2), 105(a) 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1368 Filed: 04/12/19 Entered: 04/12/19 15:52:25 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

JOINDER 1 . 

 The Federal Executive Agencies (FEA) hereby joins in the Motion by Turn for Appointment 

of Official Committee of Ratepayers Pursuant To 11 U.S.C. §§ 1102(a)(2), 105(a) and requests that 

the Court order the appointment of a committee of ratepayer claimants on the grounds that (1) the 

current official committees do not provide adequate representation of ratepayers, and (2) ratepayer 

participation through an official committee is essential to the successful reorganization of the 

debtors herein. 

 Rita Liotta is willing to serve as a member of any official committee of ratepayer claimants. 

Dated: April 12, 2019 

 

 By: /s/ Rita M. Liotta

 Rita M. Liotta 

 

Attorney for the Federal Executive Agencies 

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1368 Filed: 04/12/19 Entered: 04/12/19 15:52:25 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 10.5











GUARANTY OF PAYMENT







FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the receipt and sufficiency whereof are hereby acknowledged, Nutritional High International, Inc., hereby guarantees full, complete and prompt payment and performance by Small's Mill Holdings, Inc., its assigns, or successors in interest of all of the provisions, conditions, covenants and agreements contained in the foregoing Promissory Note, and hereby waive all notice of default by the principal, notice of the acceptance of this guaranty, and consent to any extension of time that may be given by the holder of said note to said maker, its assigns or successors in interest, of the time of payment or performance.







Dated: November        18th          , 2015







Nutritional High International, Inc.












BY:                          /"Signed"/ David Posner                   


Corporate President












Attest:












           /"Signed"/ Adam K. Szweras                                                                                                        


Corporate Secretary






















Province of Ontario                                                   )


) ss.


City of Toronto                                                                  )







The undersigned Notary Public does hereby hereby certify that _________ David Posner _________, and _____Adam K. Szweras_________________, personally known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that they signed, sealed and delivered said instrument as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth.







Given under my hand and Notarial Seal, this     18th    day of November, 2015.












____________ Karen A. Murray                     


Notary Public
----

|   | 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   | /s/  KURT H.    JENSEN |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Kurt      H. Jensen              |   |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer     |   |
|   | May      15, 2008                |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5066 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5066

      To reauthorize the National Geological and Geophysical Data 
             Preservation Program Act of 2005 through 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2014

 Mr. Benishek introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To reauthorize the National Geological and Geophysical Data 
             Preservation Program Act of 2005 through 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Data Preservation Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL DATA 
              PRESERVATION PROGRAM ACT OF 2005.

    The National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program 
Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15908) is amended in subsection (k) by striking 
``2006 through 2010'' and inserting ``2015 through 2019''.
                                 <all>
```
NO. SCEC-12-0000714

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

KHISTINA CALDWELL DEJEAN, Plaintiff,

vs. SCOTT NAGO, Chief Election Officer, Office of Elections, State of Hawai # i; and DAVID M. LOUIE, Attorney General,

State of Hawai # i, Defendants.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER (By : R eck ten wal d, C.J ., Nak aya ma, Ac oba , M cKe nnaan d P oll ack , J J.)

Upon consideration of the “Motion for Extension of Time/Reconsideration”, which was filed by Plaintiff Khistina Caldwell DeJean on September 7, 2012, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied as untimely. See Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a) (“A motion for reconsideration may be filed by a party only within 10 days after the filing of the opinion, dispositional order, or ruling unless by special leave additional time is granted during such period by a judge or justice of the appellate court involved.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 13, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-12-0000714 13-SEP-2012 07:58 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5062 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5062

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to specify that 
privilege and confidentiality are maintained when information is shared 
    by certain nondepository covered persons with Federal and State 
              financial regulators, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Examination and Supervisory 
Privilege Parity Act of 2014''.
SEC. 2. PRIVILEGE OF INFORMATION SHARED BY CERTAIN NONDEPOSITORY 
COVERED PERSONS.
    Section 1024(b)(3) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5514(b)(3)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``regulators and the State bank regulatory 
    authorities'' and inserting ``regulators, the State bank regulatory 
    authorities, and the State agencies that licence, supervise, or 
    examine the offering of consumer financial products or services''; 
    and
        (2) by adding at the end the following: ``The sharing of 
    information with such regulators, authorities, and agencies shall 
    not be construed as waiving, destroying, or otherwise affecting any 
    privilege or confidentiality such person may claim with respect to 
    such information under Federal or State law as to any person or 
    entity other than such Bureau, agency, supervisor, or authority.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Order entered February 24 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00541
- CV JOHN D. COPELAND, Appellant
V. JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. 08
- 13097 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s February 15, 2014 motion to file corrected brief and extend time for filing

. We ORDER the brief tendered to the Clerk on February 2 1, 2014 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUS TICE
#### MARGARET NANCE REECE v. DAVIS J. REECE.

(Filed 10 May, 1950.)

Divorce and Alimony § 12—

The right to subsistence pending trial in a wife’s action under G.S. 50-16, does not exist in favor of a wife who has abandoned her husband without just cause.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Burney, J.,*at Chambers, 21 January, 1950, in action pending in tbe Superior Court of New HaNovee County.

Independent action for subsistence without divorce under G.S. 50-16.

It is alleged by plaintiff and admitted by defendant that the parties are husband and wife, and that they have-been living in a state of separation since 3 September, 1947. Tbe complaint states a good cause of *96action for subsistence without divorce under the provision of G-.S. 50-16 authorizing such relief for a wife whose husband has separated himself from her and failed to provide her with necessary subsistence according to his means and conditions in life. *Reece v. Reece,*231 N.C. 321, 56 S.E. 2d 641. The answer denies all misconduct on the part of the defendant, and alleges affirmatively that the separation of the parties was eatised by the act of the plaintiff in abandoning the defendant without just cause. The plaintiff applied to the court for an allowance for subsistence from the estate or earnings of the defendant pending the trial, and the defendant appeared in opposition to the application. The court heard the pleadings, affidavits, and oral testimony of the parties, and made full findings of fact thereon, including the specific finding “that the defendant, Davis J. Reece, did not abandon the plaintiff, Margaret Nance Reece, as alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint; but, on the contrary, the plaintiff . . . voluntarily of her own free will and accord, without any fault on the part of the defendant, abandoned the defendant on September 3, 1947.” The court thereupon entered an order denying the application of the plaintiff for an allowance of subsistence pending the trial, and the plaintiff appealed, assigning such ruling as error.

*Wallon Peter Burhhimer fox plaintiff, appellant.*

*Allen S Henderson and Aaron Goldberg for defendant, appellee.*

EbviN, J.

The statute now codified as G-.S. 50-16 was enacted to establish an efficient procedure for enforcement of the marital right of the wife to support by the husband. Such right does not exist, however, in favor of a wife who has abandoned her husband without just cause. This being true, the court rightly refused the application of the plaintiff for an allowance for subsistence from the estate or earnings of the defendant pending the trial. *Byerly v. Byerly,*194 N.C. 532, 140 S.E. 158; *McManus v. McManus,*191 N.C. 140, 133 S.E. 9. See, also: *Pollard v. Pollard,*221 N.C. 46, 19 S.E. 2d 1; and *Byrum v. Byrum,*207 N.C. 655, 178 S.E. 97. In consequence, the order in question is

Affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOVITA SALAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72357

Agency No. A075-568-026

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 11, 2011** 

Before: THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. 

Jovita Salas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,

FILED

AUG 17 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72357

Lopez v. INS, 184 F.3d 1097, 1099 (9th Cir. 1999), and we deny the petition for

review.

The BIA properly concluded that Salas was ineligible for cancellation of

removal because she lacked seven years of continuous residence in the United

States after being “admitted in any status.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2); Vasquez 

De Alcantar, No. 08-71427, 2001 WL 2163965 at *5 (9th Cir. June 3, 2011) (filing

an application for adjustment of status does not constitute “admitted in any

status”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6701
JIMMY TINSLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at R oanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-119-R) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate j udge and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Tinsley v. Angelone , No. CA-96-119-R (W.D. VA. Apr. 14, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTE TL E R L LP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

APPENDIX B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2855-2 Filed: 07/03/19 Entered: 07/03/19 09:10:34 Page 1

of 2
Fire damage is seen from the air in the Coffey Park neighborhood of Santa Rosa, California on October 11, 2017. https://

news/2017/10/14/76679/coffey-park-in-santa-rosa-is-ground-zero-for-calif/ 

Appendix B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2855-2 Filed: 07/03/19 Entered: 07/03/19 09:10:34 Pag

of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1998 MASCOTECH, INC. 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          30,630
<SECURITIES>                                     9,220
<RECEIVABLES>                                  235,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    177,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               499,640
<PP&E>                                         907,550
<DEPRECIATION>                               (285,650)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,008,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,240
<BONDS>                                      1,303,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,350
<OTHER-SE>                                     211,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,008,070
<SALES>                                        834,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               834,240
<CGS>                                          612,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  612,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,060
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             62,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,580
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,514,620
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,186,916)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,580
<SALES>                                          1,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (3,966)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,881)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,881)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|    |                                                                                                               |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |
| /s/ Neal A. Shear                                        |
| Neal A. Shear                                            |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer of                       |
| Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of |
| Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.                           |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 3, 2014

No. 04-14-00760-CV

IN RE Linda Christina Benavides ALEXANDER and Shirley Hale Mathis, guardians of the 

person and estate of Carlos Y. Benavides Jr., Relator

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On October 30, 2014, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus, prohibition and 

injunction with a motion for temporary relief and emergency stay. 

Relator’s motion for temporary relief is GRANTED. All proceedings in Cause No. 

2012CVQ000161-D3, styled Texas Community Bank, N.A. v. Shirley Hale Mathis, Temporary 

Guardian of Carlos Y. Benavides Jr., and Leticia R. Benavides, pending in the 49th Judicial 

District Court, Webb County, Texas, are TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of 

this court. 

The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this court.

It is so ORDERED on November 3rd, 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012CVQ000161-D3, styled Texas Community Bank, N.A. v. Shirley Hale 

Mathis, Temporary Guardian of Carlos Y. Benavides Jr., and Leticia R. Benavides, pending in the 49th Judicial 

District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Joe Lopez presiding.