alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                                          23,422 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,261 
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (616)
<INVENTORY>                                        667 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,956 
<PP&E>                                           2,697 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     268 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,254 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,057 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                             7 
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,933 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,254 
<SALES>                                          2,833 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,315 
<CGS>                                              280 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,609 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,166 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    (7)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,195)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,454)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,741)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,741)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.50)
                                           


</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12192 and #12193]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Florida dated 05/25/2010. *Incident:*
                         Freezing Temperatures and Sinkholes. *Incident Period:*
                         01/02/2010 through 02/01/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         05/25/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/26/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/25/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                    Hillsborough. *Contiguous Counties:* Florida: Hardee, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.125Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.562Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12192 7 and for economic inj ury is 12193 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: May 25, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-13192 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2
     I, Gerhard H. Wehr, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Applied DNA
Sciences, Inc. ;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

                                 /s/ Gerhard H. Wehr
                                     Gerhard H. Wehr
                                Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 14, 2003
exv4w4w3




 


Exhibit 4.4.3




HANOVER CAPITAL MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC.

1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




AMENDMENT NO. 2




     The Hanover Capital Mortgage Holdings, Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby
amended, effective as of April 17, 2009, to change the name of the Plan to “The Walter Investment
Management Corp. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan” and to change all references therein to “Hanover
Capital Mortgage Holdings, Inc.” to “Walter Investment Management Corp.”
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
May 2, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51245 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OCTAVIO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

------------------------------------------------------------ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-00-CR-133-2

------------------------------------------------------------
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Octavio Rodriguez, federal prisoner # 05119-180, has appealed the district court’s denial of

his “Motion for Downward Departure Based on Post-Conviction Rehabilitation and Alien Status.”

He contends that the district court should have reduced his sentence based on his “excellent” postconviction rehabilitation efforts and the fact that his alien status makes him ineligible for certain prison

programs.-2-

The district court is prohibited from mo difying a term of imprisonment once it has been

imposed except in certain l imit ed circumstances. S ee 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Rodriguez’s postconviction motion for downward departure does not fall under any of these circumstances; thus, it

was unauthorized and without a jurisdictional basis. S ee United States v. Early

, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42

(5th Cir. 1994). The appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.

Howard v. King

, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Rodriguez is WARNED

that future frivolous appeals may result in the imposition of sanctions.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5146 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5146

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 700 Grant Street 
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ``Joseph F. Weis Jr. United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2014

 Mr. Doyle (for himself and Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 700 Grant Street 
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ``Joseph F. Weis Jr. United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 700 Grant Street in 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ``Joseph 
F. Weis Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph F. Weis 
Jr. United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2435-1 Filed: 06/06/19 Entered: 06/06/19 14:32:24 Page 1

of 2
COMPENSATION BY PROFESSIONAL 

APRIL 1, 2019 THROUGH APRIL 30, 2019 

The attorneys and paraprofessionals who rendered legal services in these Chapter 11 Cases from 

April 1, 2019 through April 30, 2019 (the “Fee Period”) are: 

NAME OF 

PROFESSIONAL: POSITION 

YEAR 

ADMITTED 

HOURLY

RATE 

TOTAL

HOURS

BILLED 

TOTAL 

COMPENSATION 

Tobias S. Keller Partner 1990 800 52.2 $41,760 

Peter J. Benvenutti Partner 1974 800 96.8 $77,440 

Jane Kim Partner 20031 650 135.7 $88,205 

Keith A. McDaniels Of Counsel 1997 6002 11.7 $6,630 

Berry Spears Of Counsel 19823 800 2.5 $2,000 

Thomas B. Rupp Associate 2011 400 91.5 $36,600 

Jacob Bodden Paralegal Trainee N/A 150 124.1 $18,615 

Total Professionals: 514.5 $271,250 

1 Member of the California Bar since 2014 

2 Non-working travel (1.3 hours) billed at $300. 

3 Member of the Texas Bar. 

 PROFESSIONALS 

TOTALS: 

BLENDED RATE 

(rounded to nearest 

dollar) 

TOTAL HOURS 

BILLED 

TOTAL 

COMPENSATION 

Partners and Counsel 730 298.9 $216,035 

Associates 400 91.5 $36,600 

Blended Attorney Rate 675 390.4 $252,635 

Paraprofessionals and other non-legal staff 150 124.1 $18,615 

Total Fees Incurred 600 514.5 $271,250 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2435-1 Filed: 06/06/19 Entered: 06/06/19 14:32:24 Page 2

of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Craig K. Tagawa, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American SharedHospital Services;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and
b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;] and
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (or the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
May 14, 2004     /s/ Craig K. TagawaCraig K. TagawaChief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. PETER HARRIS and NED HARRIS.

(Filed 10 September, 1930.)

Criminal Daw D a — Where case is not docketed according to Rules of Court appeal will he dismissed.

Where the appellant in a criminal action has failed to have his case docketed in the time required by the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, in order to preserve his right to appeal it is required that he file an application for a *e&'tiorari,*addressed to the sound discretion of the Supreme Court, and show a good and sufficient reason for granting his motion therefor, and where this has not been done the appeal will be dismissed upon motion of the State.

Appeal by defendants from *Sinclair, J.,*at January Term, 1930, of IÍDGECOMBE.

Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendants with the murder of one Tom Cooper.

From a verdict of manslaughter and judgment entered thereon, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.

Motion by State to dismiss appeal.

*378
      *Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

*B. T. Fountain, T. W. Fitts amd George M. Fountain for defendants.*

Stacy, C. J.

Tbis action was tried at tbe January Term, 1930, Edgecombe Superior Court, wbicb commenced 20 January and ended five days thereafter. Tbe case on appeal was docketed here 20 August, 1930. There was no application for a writ of *certiorari*at the next succeeding term of the Supreme Court commencing after the rendition of the judgment in the Superior Court, the term to which the appeal should have been brought. *S. v. Farmer,*188 N. C., 243, 124 S. E., 562; *Pentuff v. Park,*195 N. C., 609, 143 S. E., 139.

The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed for failure to comply with the rules. *S. v. Surety Co.,*192 N. C., 52, 133 S. E., 172; *Stone v. Ledbetter,*191 N. C., 777, 133 S. E., 162.

It is true that appeals in civil cases from the First, Second, Third and Fourth districts which are tried between the first day of January and the first Monday in February, or between the first day of August and the fourth Monday in August, are not required to be docketed at the immediately succeeding term of this Court, though the rule is otherwise in criminal prosecutions, and even in civil cases if docketed in time for hearing at said first term, the appeal will stand regularly for argument. *Pentuff v. Park, supra.*

Appeal dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Romulo Gil, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Pena, Appellant.

Decided November 30, 1995

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeals dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not "on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]).
#### Arno Schoff and others, v. Moses G. Rosenberg.

Motion for reargument denied.
#### William Blackinton and others, Appellants, v. Adolph Goldsmith, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 16, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1551 Lower Tribunal No. F01-6785

________________ Alonso Valencia, Appellant,
vs. The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge. Alonso Valencia, in proper person. Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney, and Tim VanderGiesen, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee. Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Asia Document Transition, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  October
13, 2009





/s/ Bernard ChanBernard
      ChanPrincipal
      Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Accounting Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ASIA DOCUMENT TRANSITION, INC. and will be retained by ASIA DOCUMENT TRANSITION,
INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 3

Lease Accounting Audit Engagement Letter

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 1

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 2

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 3

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 4

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 5

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 6

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 7

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 8

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 9

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 10

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 11

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 12

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 13

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 14

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 15

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 16

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 17

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 18

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 19

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 20

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 21

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 22

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 23

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 24

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 25

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 26

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 27

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 28

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-5 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 29

of 29
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 19, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 19, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0138. SHANNON SUTTON et al. v. LARRY SWANSON . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 19C100147