alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE EDUARDO DURAN-ORTIZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-73422 

Agency No. A089-926-009 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 12, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Eduardo Duran-Ortiz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-73422 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

the BIA’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 

2006). We deny the petition for review. 

Duran-Ortiz does not challenge the BIA’s dispositive finding that his asylum 

application was untimely and that he failed to establish changed or extraordinary 

circumstances to excuse his untimely filing. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 

1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to asylum.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Duran-Ortiz is not 

entitled to withholding of removal because he failed to establish he was or would 

be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 

1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by 

criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus 

to a protected ground”).

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief 

because Duran-Ortiz failed to show that it is more likely than not that he would be 

tortured upon his return to Mexico. See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1049 

(9th Cir. 2013).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         207,951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,200
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               416,194
<PP&E>                                      12,649,032
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,089,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,976,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,162,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,976,006
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,695,450
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  751,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               351,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             813,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (217,796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (217,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-11-00581-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RISING STARS THERAPY CENTER, LLC, Appellant,

v.

GILBERTO IRACHETA, AND MARIA IRACHETA

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF

EMILY IRACHETA, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 139th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 139th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas in trial court cause number C-1446-11-C. Appellant has now 

filed an unopposed motion for remand in aid of settlement. The Court, having examined 

and fully considered the unopposed motion for remand, is of the opinion that the motion 
2

should be granted. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion for remand in aid of settlement. 

We set aside the trial court’s order for turnover relief without regard to the merits, and we 

remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ 

agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Pursuant to the agreement of the 

parties, costs will be taxed against the party incurring the same. See id. R. 42.1(d) 

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 25th 

day of October, 2011.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel; Research on Integrity in Collaborative Research.                    

*Date:*                         July 15, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Roosevelt, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Barbara J. Nelson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Review, NCRR, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., 1 Democracy Plaza, Room 1080, MSC 4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0806.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure; 93.306, 93.333, 93.702, ARRA Related Construction Awards; National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 24, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-12941 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Joseph M. Johnson and others, Executors, etc.

— Motion denied upon appellants paying ten dollars costs of motion and stipulating to argue at February General Term and perfecting appeal by giving proper undertaking ; the costs and stipulation and undertaking to be paid or given within five days after notice of this order.
#### Anna B. Neal, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of *Smith*v. *The City of Rochester*(92 N. Y. 463; 38 Hun, 612; 104 N. Y. 674).
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Sequans Communications S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Dr. Georges Karam, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 29, 2013



|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Dr. Georges Karam         
|    |  | Name: Dr. Georges Karam       
|    |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
pro hac vice

pro hac vice

pro hac vice

pro hac vice

Counsel to the Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured 

Noteholders of Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, No. 

19-30088 (DM).

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2744 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 08:29:34 Page 1 of

3
Motion of the Ad Hoc Committee 

of Senior Unsecured Noteholders to Terminate the Debtor’ Exclusive Periods Pursuant to Section 

1121(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2744 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 08:29:34 Page 2 of

3
/s/ Ashley Vinson Crawford

pro hac vice

pro hac vice

pro hac vice

pro hac vice

Counsel to the Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured 

Noteholders of Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2744 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 08:29:34 Page 3 of

3
MANAGEMENT
        LLC




ANNUAL
      STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE




OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATE






Re:
      COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES
      2006-IQ12




As
      an
      authorized officer of Babson Capital Management LLC, I certify that (i) a review
      of the activities of the Subservicer, for the period ending December 31, 2006,
      and of its  performance under the Primary Servicing Agreement dated as of
      December 1, 2006 and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December
      1, 2006 (the Agreements), has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
      of my knowledge, based on such review, Babson Capital Management, LLC has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements in all material respects
      throughout the aforementioned period; and (iii) has received no notice regarding
      qualification, or challenging the status, of any portion of the Trust Fund
      as a
      REMIC for the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or
      body.








Dated:
      February 28, 2007




Babson
      Capital Management LLC






By:
      /s/ Joanne Denver


Joanne
      Denver


Its:Managing
      Director






1500
      Main
      Street•Springfield, MA 01115• Tel+1.413.226.1000 •Toll Free+1.888.428.8809 
• www.babsoncapital.com
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4948 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4948

To provide for emergency supplemental appropriations for the Office of 
      the Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2014

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for emergency supplemental appropriations for the Office of 
      the Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Investigation and Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR 
              GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    The following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fiscal year 2014:

                     DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

                      Departmental Administration

                      office of inspector general

    For an additional amount for ``Office of Inspector General'', 
$12,000,000: Provided, That such amount is designated by the Congress 
as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, except that 
such amount shall be available only if the President subsequently so 
designates such amount and transmits such designation to the Congress.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Boerne to Bergheim Coalition for Clean

Environment

,

Appellant

,

v.

Texas Commission on Environmental

Quality and Vulcan Construction

Materials, LLC

,

Appellee s

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 20

- 00 035

- C V

Appeal from the

459 th District Court

of Travis C ounty, Texas

(TC# D

- 1

- GN

- 18

- 003134 )

C O R R E C T E D

O R D E R

The Court on its own motion, VACATES the January 13 , 2021 submission and oral

argument setting. The above styled and numbered cause will be rescheduled at a later date

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 th d ay of January, 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C. J., Palafox, J., and Ferguson, Judge

(Ferguson, Judge, sitting by assignment)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      12,618,694
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,727
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,400,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 46,093,450
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      17,622,120
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        18,707,155
<LOANS>                                    156,107,304
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,787,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             250,386,189
<DEPOSITS>                                 230,445,040
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,066,754
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,532,919
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,236,210
<COMMON>                                       242,426
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,862,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             250,386,189
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,889,514
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,517,771
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               441,304
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,848,589
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,910,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,107,576
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,741,013
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  756,450
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,558,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,518,263
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,855,265
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,855,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.12
<LOANS-NON>                                    610,725
<LOANS-PAST>                                   518,879
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,414,826
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  506,524
<RECOVERIES>                                   122,378
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,787,130
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            80,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,707,130
        

</TABLE>
### CORRECTED MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

TO THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, on September 24, 2009

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

HEYWOOD JOSEPH SHOLARS,

APPELLANT

NO. 01

- 08

- 00060

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE Appeal from the 208th District Court of

Harris County, Texas. (Tr. Ct. No.

1034 5 39). Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hanks, and Bland. Opinion delivered by Justice Keyes.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

A The cause heard today by the Co urt is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on January 16, 2008. After submitting the cause and inspecting the record of the court below, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no reversible error in the judgment. It is, therefor e CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED , and ORDERED that the judgment of the court below be in all things affirmed

.

It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Justices Keyes, Hanks, and Bland. @WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

November 24, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Franklin Coy Kuhl, Jr., Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00188

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

1423952 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cou rt

. We note that the appellant, Franklin Coy Kuhl, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDER ED JUNE 16, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0001011024
<NAME>                        ARCADIANA BANCSHARES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                3,668
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                8,254
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                          0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                        285
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>          26,060
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>               11,921
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                 11,958
<LOANS>                             247,743
<ALLOWANCE>                           2,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      305,696
<DEPOSITS>                          213,212
<SHORT-TERM>                          6,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     884
<LONG-TERM>                          57,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 27
<OTHER-SE>                           27,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>      305,696
<INTEREST-LOAN>                      18,288
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     2,667
<INTEREST-OTHER>                        452
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                     21,407
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    9,488
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   12,195
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                 9,212
<LOAN-LOSSES>                             0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                       (8)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       6,771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       3,435
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>            3,435
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          3,435
<EPS-BASIC>                            1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                         3.28
<LOANS-NON>                               0
<LOANS-PAST>                              0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                        453
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                      2,726
<CHARGE-OFFS>                          (185)
<RECOVERIES>                            206
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                     2,747
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                  2,747
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                       0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                   0


</TABLE>