alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 67 4 . CANDI DA SUMMERLI N v . THE STATE.

Can d i d a Su m

m erl i n fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s ord er d en y i n g

h er m o ti o n fo r s u m

m ary ju d g m en t

. W e d i sm i s s ed th e ap p eal b ecau s e t h e reco rd d id

n o t co nt ai n a t i m el y m o t i o n f o r n ew t ri al

. Su m

m erl i n h as fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r

reco n s i d erat i on fro m t h i s ru l in g, as s ert i ng t h at s h e fi l ed a t i m el y m ot i o n fo r n ew t ri al

,

b u t u s ed t he i n co rrect lo w er co u rt cas e n u m b er. Su m m erl in at t ach ed d o cu m en t s

s h o wi n g t h at t he t ri al co urt g ran t ed her m o t i o n t o t ran s fer th e p l ead i n g to th e co rrect

cas e n u m b er. Bu t t h e p lead i n g was n o t

, i n fact

, i n cl u d ed i n t he reco rd tran s m i t t ed to

t h i s Co u rt

. 1

Acco rd i ng l y , Su m

m erl i n ’ s m o t io n fo r reco n si derat io n i s hereb y GRANTED,

an d o u r p ri o r d i s m i s s al ord er i s VACATED. Th e ap p eal i s REINSTATED an d

R E M ANDED t o t h e tri al co u rt fo r co m p l et i o n o f t h e reco rd

. Up o n co m pl et i o n

, t h e

cl erk i s d i rect ed t o t ran s m i t t h e co m p l et e reco rd t o t h i s Co u rt fo r re-d o ck et i n g o f t h e

ap p eal . Su m

m erl i n n eed n o t fi l e a s eco n d n o t i ce o f ap p eal

.

1 W e are u nab l e t o as s u m e ju ri s di ct i on b as ed up o n t h e d o cu m en ts s u b m i t t ed by

Su m m erl i n as an at t ach m en t t o a p l ead i ng c a n n o t be u s ed i n l i eu o f t he reco rd

. See

W i l l ia ms v. Mo r

ga n , 2 6 2 Ga. Ap p . 8 4 8 (1 ) (5 8 6 SE2 d 7 4 0 ) (2 0 03 ). February 04, 2016C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/04/2016
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5043 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5043

 To amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 to direct the 
 Secretary of State to submit reports to Congress on child protection 
                               compacts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2014

   Mr. Peters of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 to direct the 
 Secretary of State to submit reports to Congress on child protection 
                               compacts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as--
            (1) the ``Partnering to Abolish Child Trafficking Act''; or
            (2) the ``PACT Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORTS ON CHILD PROTECTION COMPACTS.

    Section 105A(d) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 
(22 U.S.C. 7103a(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Reports.--The Secretary of State, acting through the 
        Director established pursuant to section 105(e)(1) of this Act, 
        shall submit an annual report to Congress, which shall include 
        information regarding--
                    ``(A) child protection compacts under this 
                subsection;
                    ``(B) countries with which the United States may 
                enter into a child protection compact under this 
                subsection; and
                    ``(C) assistance provided under this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Bankruptcy Court

Northern District of California

In re: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Case No.: 19-30088

 and PG&E Corporation

Court ID (Court use only)_____________

NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). Transferee

hereby gives notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security,

of the claim referenced in this notice.

Hain Capital Investors Master Fund, Ltd American Crane Rental, Inc.

Name of Transferor

Name and Address where notices to transferee Court Record Address of Transferor

should be sent (Court Use Only)

Hain Capital Investors Master Fund, Ltd

301 Route 17, 7th Floor

Rutherford, NJ 07070

Attn: Cheryl Eckstein

Phone: (201) 896 - 6100

Last Four Digits of Acct #: ______________ Last Four Digits of Acct. #: ___________

Name and Address where transferee payments Name and Current Address of Transferor

should be sent (if different from above) 

 American Crane Rental, Inc.

17800 Comconex Road

Manteca, CA 95336

Court Claim # (if known): 3431 

Amount of claim to transfer: $757,380.63

Date Claim Filed: 6/21/19

Scheduled Claim Amount: $647,300.00

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the best

of my knowledge and belief.

By:_/s/ Cheryl Eckstein Date: 7/18/19

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

~~DEADLINE TO OBJECT TO TRANSFER~~

The transferor of claim named above is advised that this Notice of Transfer of Claim Other Than for

Security has been filed in the clerk’s office of this court as evidence of the transfer. Objections must be

filed with the court within twenty (20) days of the mailing of this notice. If no objection is timely received

by the court, the transferee will be substituted as the original claimant without further order of the court.

Date:___________ ______________________________

CLERK OF THE COURT

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3046 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 07:15:59 Page 1 of

2
Robert J Koltai

Managing Member

15th

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3046 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 07:15:59 Page 2 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 196 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:12:53 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 196 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:12:53 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 196 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:12:53 Page 3 of 3
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5067 

To require the Federal Insurance Office to carry out a study on illegal 

steering and redlining in the insurance industry. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2014 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Insurance Office to carry out a study 

on illegal steering and redlining in the insurance industry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY ON INSURANCE STEERING AND RED4 LINING. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Director of the Federal Insurance 

6 Office shall carry out a study to determine whether the 

7 insurance industry is engaging in the illegal practices of 

8 insurance steering or redlining. In carrying out such 

9 study, the Director shall investigate insurance products, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5067 IH

1 pricing, promotions, and placement of services being of2 fered to consumers in the United States. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than the end of the 180-day 

4 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

5 the Director shall issue a report to the Congress con6 taining— 

7 (1) all findings and determinations made in car8 rying out the study required under subsection (a); 

9 and 

10 (2) any legislative recommendations the Direc11 tor may determine appropriate. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1304

___________

Bobby Dean Lewis, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Danny Estes, in his individual and his * District Court for the

official capacity as Sheriff of * Western District of Missouri.

Nodaway County, Missouri; Tray *

Pitts, in his individual capacity as *

Deputy Sheriff; D. L. Merrill, Trooper, * [UNPUBLISHED]

in his individual capacity; David A. *

Baird, Prosecuting Attorney for *

Nodaway County, Missouri, in his *

individual capacity; Roger Combs, *

Circuit Judge for Nodaway County, *

Missouri, in his individual capacity, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: November 6, 2000

 Filed: November 8, 2000

___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The HONORABLE NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, United States District Judge

for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Missouri inmate Bobby Dean Lewis appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he had sought a declaratory

judgment against a judge, a prosecuting attorney, a sheriff, a deputy sheriff, and a state

trooper. 

Lewis argues this dismissal was erroneous because he paid his filing fee. We

disagree. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (granting district court authority to review, before

or immediately after docketing, all prisoners’ civil complaints that seek redress from

governmental entities, officers, or employees; court shall dismiss actions that are, inter

alia, frivolous or malicious); Rowe v. Shake, 196 F.3d 778, 781 (7th Cir. 1999) (based

on plain statutory language, “§ 1915A applies to all prisoners, no matter their fee

status, who bring suit against a government entity, officer, or employee”); Carr v.

Dvorin, 171 F.3d 115, 116 (2d Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (§ 1915A’s screening procedure

applies to all civil complaints filed by prisoners, regardless of payment of filing fee);

McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 608 (6th Cir. 1997) (same).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28817-28818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before April 23, 2010. Pursuant to section 
60.13 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being accepted concerning 
the significance of the nominated properties under the National 
Register criteria for evaluation. Comments are also being accepted on 
the following properties being considered for removal pursuant to 36 
CFR 60.15. Comments may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, 
to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 
1849 C St., NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, 
National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye 
St., NW., 8th floor, Washington DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. 
Written or faxed comments should be submitted by June 8, 2010.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

ILLINOIS

Cook County

Sauganash Historic District, Roughly bounded by Lemont and Keating 
Aves, Chicago and Northwestern Railway, and the alley to the east of 
Kilbourn Ave, Chicago, 10000310

Union Park Hotel, 1519-1521 W Warren Blvd, Chicago, 10000309

West Argyle Street Historic District, Roughly bounded by N Sheridan 
Rd, W Ainslie St, N Broadway, and W Winona St, Chicago, 10000311

Kane County

St. Charles Hospital, 400 E New York St, Aurora, 10000312

MISSOURI

Montgomery County

McKittrick Farmers Mercantile, 500 Washington St, McKittrick, 
10000313

NORTH CAROLINA

Johnston County

Clayton Historic District, Bounded by Mulberry St, W Barnes St, Mill 
St, S Lombard St, Blanch St, Clayton, 10000314


[[Page 28818]]



OHIO

Cuyahoga County

Baldwin-Wallace College South Campus Historic District, Seminary St 
between School and Church Front to Beach, variable W/E boundary, 
Berea, 10000315

SOUTH CAROLINA

Greenville County

Quillen, Robert, Office and Library, 200 N Main St, Greenville, 
10000316

Spartanburg County

Davis, James M., House, 2763 Old Hwy 14 S, Pelham, 10000317

WISCONSIN

Columbia County

Bellack, Albert M. and Alice, House, 628 W James St, Columbus, 
10000318

Schendel, Reinhard and Amelia, House, 211 N Ludington St, Columbus, 
10000319

[FR Doc. 2010-12338 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                        1,432,135
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                         932,135
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,649,586
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               3,970,324
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,834,710
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                     4,154,759
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    2,344,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          6,499,706
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                113,833
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                     5,592,427
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       11,388,251
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       12,916,451
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      214,301
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                             0
<NET-ASSETS>                                 7,335,004
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              239,846
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 113,552
<EXPENSES-NET>                               4,037,272
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              0
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                             0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                            0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                                0
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     (1,009,909)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      7,335,004
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,864
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              4,037,272
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         8,063,200
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                              .67
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                      0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                              0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                                .64
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                      0


</TABLE>
### THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN 

### 11.

TEXAS

Dear 19lr: Opinion Ho. O-6452 rxc Cgnstnmtion of Art. 7452,

. . ., lg& mlhlng to exuaptiorm

in favorof retedn8rUnr regletrrlng

undrrr prioraot. You hwe nquemted the opinionof Ml8 Depwtmemt as to whetherone hmvlng two yean in a reoognizcd 8akwol of vetorlnery mdioirw and rive years of aotual practice ae a veterinprian prior to the year 1911,mayre$r, lp7, A&S. 7 Aster aa a veterlnarlur under the 9mvlaions of title

8-7465,lnoluaive,

R. C. d., l%?f5. Artlole7451 prohibita the praatics

of veterinary

wdlclne by eny personwho has not complied with tie provisions cf Title 127, md who ha8 not registered with the dLatr%at clerk of the county of hir mmldence. Art. 7452 oets out aertain sxoeytione to Art. 7451, awng &ah is the provl8ion that cne “heretofore regiatem4 as a veterinary

auqgeonln the oountyof hi0 realdenae aacordirq

to the provieiom of Ctupter76 of the Aotr of the Regulv Sessionot the

lcn view ef the expre86lurguage oi the *bovo quotedrt8tute we th%nk it elw tht ma mu m~trPrtI.on of a 

### veterinar%an is mfhoriwd thereby

beoauae0r hir fmwr pxwtloe or **odueation** - t he l zatutemmly euthtMr@d Ris oontlnue+S pnratioe

**b ~WWI**  

### or **L** pa4orbnful~rtr&lou Mdwadwth4llafted oun gmAwt*" eertlfxoee. di ton8 of 1.It 1~ rlnorrvl **hoped** that **our VleW8**  on this mttor will k L OS auida8ee you. Your8 very truly A-P-W1FpxAs 8/ SJgebeAlvla

msene Alvia Ar618tant
EXHIBIT-11.1


                             THE LAMAUR CORPORATION
                            --------------------------------------------------
                             COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS $(000)
                             --------------------------------------------------
                             Years Ended December 31,

                                           1996          1995              1994


Net Income (loss)                        $  553        $(1,382)          $ (616)
---------------------
Dividends on Series B Preferred Stock      (233)
------------------------------         --------------- ------------ ------------
Net Income (Loss) Available to
Common Shareholders                      $  320        $(1,382)          $ (616)


Number of Shares:
  Weighted Average Shares Outstanding     4,541          2,667            2,498
  Effect of Shares Issued within One Year
  of Public Offering                         16            294              463
  Incremental Shares from the Exercise
  of Warrants and Options (1)               392            465              465
  Shares Issued Upon the Conversion of
  Series A Preferred Stock                  660            660              660

Total Weighted Average Common and
 Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding     5,609          4,086            4,086
                                         =========== ============= =============

Net Income (Loss) Per Share             $   .06        $  (.34)         $  (.15)
                                         =========== ============== ============


(1) In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
common stock and common stock  equivalents of the Company issued within one year
of its initial public  offering have been  considered as  outstanding  since the
inception of the Company using the treasury  stock method,  even though they are
anti-dilutive in loss periods. Common stock equivalents issued prior to one year
of the Company's  initial  public  offering are excluded in loss periods as they
are anti-dilutive.
(2) Fully diluted earnings per share is not presented since it is anti-dilutive.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6703

DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. ( 1:22

- mc - 00015

- MR

- WCM )

Submitted : September 22, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022

Before WILKINSON , DIAZ, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dwight Alexander Rudisill , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6703 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Dwight Alexander Rudisill appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 27(a) petition to perpetuate testimony

. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the unverified petition b ecause Rudisill failed to show an immediate need to perpetuate testimony to prevent it from being lost

. See Deiulemar Compagnia Di Navigazione S.p.A. v. M/V Allegra , 198 F.3d 473, 479,
484

- 85 & n.16 (4th Cir. 1999) (stating standard of review and addressing showing peti tioner must make)

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order on this basis

. Rudisill v. United States , No. 1:22

- mc - 00015

- MR

- WCM (W.D.N.C. May 26, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presen ted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6703 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2