alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
VISION ACQUISITION III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antii William Uusiheimala, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William
    UusiheimalaAntii
      William UusiheimalaPrincipal
      Executive OfficerDecember
      29, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Mark A Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  |  |    
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 15, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark A. Smith
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             |  | Mark A. Smith          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:            |  | Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1259830.1

COOPER, WHITE

& COOPER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

201 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5002

COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP

PETER C. CALIFANO (SBN 129043)

pcalifano@cwclaw.com

201 California Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 433-1900

Facsimile: (415) 433-5530

Attorneys for Creditor GOWAN

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[San Francisco Division]

In re

PG&E CORPORATION

-and- PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

COMPANY,

Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession.

Case No. 19-30088-DM

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

WITHDRAWAL OF GOWAN'S

PROOF OF 503(b)(9) CLAIM

Affects all Debtors [NO HEARING REQUIRED]

Affects PG&E Corporation

Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

*All papers shall be filed in the lead case,

19-30088 (DM)

Creditor Gowan Construction Company, Inc. ("Gowan"), by and through its attorneys,

Cooper, White & Cooper LLP, whose address is listed above, hereby withdraws its Proof of

503(b)(9) Claim (the "Claim"), filed in this case on April 9, 2019 as Claim No. 2138 in the amount

of $104,006.48, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

DATED: June 5, 2019 COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP

By: /s/Peter C. Califano

Peter C. Califano, Attorneys for Creditor

GOWAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2413 Filed: 06/05/19 Entered: 06/05/19 17:19:07 Page 1 of

1
#### John W. Brigham and others, Respondents, v. William T. Fish, Appellant.

— Order affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO, CA

Exhibit C

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3109-3 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 17:18:43 Page 1

of 3
In re PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Lead Case NO. 19-30088 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

COMMITTEE EXPENSE FORM 

(If You Need Additional Space You May Attach Additional Pages) 

1. Name of Committee Member: 

2. Description of Committee Business: 

3. Date of Committee Business: 

4. Location of Committee Business: 

5. Dates of Travel 

Description of trip (start/end locations) 

6. Reimbursable Expenses: 

(a) Transportation: 

(1) Air or Rail Fare 

(2) Personal automobile miles at$ .58 per mile 

Total miles traveled: 248 miles 

Yuba City to San Francisco 

San Francisco to Yuba City 

(3) Taxi/Uber/Lyft/Public Transportation/Bart 

(4) Parking/Tolls 

(5) Other (describe): Tips - Car/Bags 

(b) Lodging: 

(1) Hotel (excluding meals) 

(c) Meals 

(1) Breakfast (no receipt) 

(2) Dinner 5/21/19 

TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT SOUGHT 

Karen M . Lockhart 

Attend Court Hearing 

May 22, 2019 

San Francisco 

5/21 /19 - 5/22/19 

Yuba City to San Francisco 

San Francisco to Yuba City 

$214.90 

$143 .84 

$13 

$10 

$4 

$44.06 

Please Attach Backup for Each Item Sought (Receipts, Starting and Ending Location for Mileage, etc)* 

I hereby certify that the above expenses were incurred by me in connection with attendance at a 

Committee meeting or other authorized Commit ee business. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3109-3 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 17:18:43 Page 2

of 3
1 Name of Committee Member:

2 Description of Committee Business:

3 Date of Committee Business:

4 Location:

5 Name of Representative Attending Meeting:

6 Reimbursable Expenses

(a) Transportation:

 (1) Air or Rail Fare

 (2) Personal automobile miles at $ .58 per mile

 (3) Taxi/Uber/Lyft/Public Transport

 (4) Parking/Tolls

 (5) Other (describe)

(b) Lodging:

 (1) Hotel (excluding meals)

(c) Meals:

 (1) Breakfast

 (2) Lunch (not reimburseable)

 (3) Dinner

TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT SOUGHT

(Signature of Committee Member)

COMMITTEE EXPENSE FORM

 I hereby certify that the above expenses were incurred by me in connection with attendance at a 

Committee meeting or other authorized Committee business.

(If You Need Additional Space You May Attach Additional Pages)

*Please Attach Backup for Each Item Sought (Receipts, Starting and Ending Locations for Mileage, etc.)*

In re PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Lead Case No. 19-30088

Official Committee of Tort Claimants

Gregory Wilson

US Bankruptcy Court SF

Gregory Wilson

Court Hearing

5/22/2019

$59

$18

$77

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3109-3 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 17:18:43 Page 3

of 3
#### William C. Ilsley, Respondent, v. Josephine D. Keith, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SmartHeatInc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhijuan Guo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Zhijuan GuoZhijuan Guo

Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**


**Bear
      Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-SL6**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Bear
      Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC


383
      Madison Avenue


New
      York,
      New York 10179


regabnotifications@bear.com





EMC
      Mortgage Corporation


2780
      Lake
      Vista Drive


Lewisville,
      Texas 75067





Re:  The
      Pooling and Servicing agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”),
      among Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, as Depositor and Purchaser,
      EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Seller and Master Servicer, and LaSalle Bank
      National Association, as Trustee.




I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.







Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee




/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
# altut

Cherry

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHET DUDA, Appellant,

vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 69616



# FILED MAR 2 1 2016

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Valerie Adair, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned decision, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

- ;,#0,04 Douglas

cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Chet Duda Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

(0) 1947A 

### e
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration Statement Nos. 333-152483, 333-152970,
333-153434 and 333-139679 on Form S-3 and into Registration Statement No. 333-145704 on Form S-8 of CombiMatrix
Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2009, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of CombiMatrix Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Our
report, dated March 16, 2009, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that CombiMatrix Corporation has a history of incurring net losses and net operating cash flow
deficits. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/
PETERSON SULLIVAN LLP

March 27,
2009
Seattle, Washington

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Richard L. Robbins, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Footstar, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: April 8, 2005

/s/ Richard L. Robbins

Richard L. Robbins
Senior Vice President of Financial Reporting and Control
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Michael Shaughnessy v. George K. Chase.

—Motion denied, with costs.
#### Mary A. Manley, Appellant, v. The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Brady, J.
#### Chicago Consolidated Bottling Company v. Joseph Tietz, Administrator.

*Master and Servant—Negligence of Servant—Personal Injuries of Third Person—Liability of*Master■—Evidence—Instructions—Damages.

In an action to recover from an employer for the death of a third person, alleged to have occurred through the negligence of his employe, this court holds as proper certain instructions given touching the question of damages, and declines to interfere with the verdict for the plaintiff.

[Opinion filed January 16, 1891.]

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. A. B. Jenks and James Maher, for appellant.

*600Mr. Edmund Furthmann, for appellee.

Waterman, J.

This was an action based upon the alleged negligence of appellant in running over, in the streets of Chicago, one Edmund Fritz, a child four years of age.

As shown by the "evidence the negligence of the driver of defendant’s team consisted not in fast driving, but in inattention to what was in the street before him. There was evidence tending to show that if the driver had been paying close attention to what was in the street before him, he would have seen the child; that he did not see him, although many others did and cried out, is admitted; and as his team was walking slowly, if he had been looking ahead, there seems to be no reason why he could not have stopped his team before the wheels of his wagon passed over the deceased.

Complaint is made that instructions asked for by appellant were refused, while those given at its instance are not shown in the abstract; when found in the record they seem fairly to cover the matters contained in the second instruction refused.

The jury, by the fourth instruction, were told that the plaintiff could only recover damages for the pecuniary loss sustained by the next of kin; that the pecuniary loss sustained in dollars and cents must be ascertained from the evidence as nearly as possible; that no damages could be given for mental suffering of the child’s parents, and that the jury should not be influenced by any sympathy they might have for the child’s parents.

This, in connection with the other instructions given, seems fairly to cover the subject of exemplary damages, especially as it does not appear from the verdict that the jury attempted to give other than such pecuniary damages as in their opinion the next of kin had sustained. As to damages that may be recovered in such cases, see C., M. *& St.*Paul R. R. v. Wilson, 35 Ill. App. 346.

We see" no objection to the suggestion as to the remittal of damages or to the entry of judgment after such remittal. Stuman v. Pitchman, 22 Ill. App. 399; Village of Clayton v. Brooks, 31 Ill. App. 62.

*Judgment affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned, James A. Hayward, Chief Executive Officer of Applied DNA Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”), in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.
the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.




/s/  JAMES A. HAYWARDJames A. Hayward

Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2011
## No. 0 3

- 1 2

- 00 070

- CV


## In the Third Court of Appeals A ustin , Texas

D ESTRY K ITTMAN , G LENDEE K ITTMAN , AND M ARTHA K ITTMAN , Appellant s

V
.
W. S HANE K ITTMAN , D ONALD E. A RTHUR , AND G WEN B. A RTHUR , Appelle e s

A PPEAL F ROM C AUSE N O

. 36643 33 RD J UDICIAL D ISTRICT OF B URNET C OUNTY , T EXAS H ON

. G UILFORD L. J ONES P RESIDING

AGREED, JOINT MOTON TO ABATE PENDING SET TLEMENT

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:
The parties to this appeal, through their undersigned counsel of record, file
this agreed, joint motion to abate this appeal for 30 days to allow the parties to

reach and effectuate a settlement. The parties have conferred and have agreed to
this joint mot ion, and no party opposes the relief jointly requested in this motion.
The parties have entered into settlement negotiations that, if successful,
would resolve this matter without a decision from the Court. Upon any settlement,
the parties would file an ag reed, joint motion for disposition pursuant to the terms ACCEPTED 03-12-00070-CV 8375668 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/28/2015 12:23:55 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKof their agreement after the final settlement documents have been executed. The

parties bring this motion to advise the Court about their negotiations so the Court
will not expend further time or resources on this matter in the interim.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF The parties jointly request that the Court abate this appeal for 30 days

pending conclusion of their anticipated settlement and the filing of an agreed, joint
motion for disposition pursuant to the terms of any agreement.

Respectfully submitted,

J. Bruce Bennett State Bar No. 02145500 Cardwell, Hart & Bennett LLP 807 Brazos, Suite 1001 Austin, Texas 7870 Telephone: (512)322-0011 Telecopier: (512)322-0808 Counsel for Appellants

/s/D. Todd Smith *~ D. Todd Smith State Bar No. 00797451 todd@appealsplus.com Smith Law Group LLLP 1250 Capital of Texas Hwy South Three Cielo Center, Suite 601 Austin, Texas 78746 Telephone: (512)439-3230 Telecopier: (512)439-3232 Counsel for Appellees3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On December 28 , 2015, in compliance with Texas Rule of Appell ate

Procedure 9.5 , I served this document on the following counsel of record by e

service, e

- mail, and/or first

- class United States mail:

J. Bruce Bennett C ARDWELL , H ART & B ENNETT LLP 807 Brazos, Suite 1001 Austin, Texas 78701 Counsel for Appell ant s

/s/ D. Todd Smith D. Todd Smith
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2157 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:39:44 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2157 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:39:44 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2157 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:39:44 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2157 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:39:44 Page 4 of

4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN MOSES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 505 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 16, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

*1. Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P.; Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.; Warburg Pincus X, L.P.; Warburg Pincus X, LLC; Warburg Pincus Partners, LLC; and Warburg Pincus & Co.*, all of New York, New York; to acquire voting shares of Sterling Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Sterling Savings Bank, both of Spokane, Washington, and Golf Savings Bank, Mountlake Terrace, Washington.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 27, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-13134 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S