alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2909 Filed: 07/09/19 Entered: 07/09/19 15:00:45 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2909 Filed: 07/09/19 Entered: 07/09/19 15:00:45 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2909 Filed: 07/09/19 Entered: 07/09/19 15:00:45 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2909 Filed: 07/09/19 Entered: 07/09/19 15:00:45 Page 4 of

4
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5086 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5086

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY 
              STUDY.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 
U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(__) Chief standing bear national historic trail.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Chief Standing Bear Trail, 
                extending approximately 550 miles from Niobrara, 
                Nebraska, to Ponca City, Oklahoma, which follows the 
                route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca people 
                during Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 
                miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through Omaha, 
                Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, which follows the 
                return route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca 
                people, as generally depicted on the map entitled 
                `Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail 
                Feasibility Study', numbered 903/125,630, and dated 
                November 2014.
                    ``(B) Availability of map.--The map described in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be on file and available for 
                public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
                Department of the Interior.
                    ``(C) Components.--The feasibility study conducted 
                pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall include a 
                determination on whether the Chief Standing Bear Trail 
                meets the criteria in subsection (b) for designation as 
                a national historic trail.''.
    (b) Timeline.--The feasibility study authorized by the amendment in 
subsection (a) shall be completed not later than 1 year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5086

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.
```
#### THE CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, *v.*DAVID VALENTINE, TIERNAN WILSON AND HENRY E. KNIGHT, Appellants, Impleaded with others.

*'Merely giving credit on its hooks for a note discounted*— does *not constitute the hank a holder fen' val/ue.*

The mere discounting of a note and giving a party credit on the books of the bank for the amount thereof does not constitute the bank a holder for value.

Appeal by the defendants Valentine, Wilson & Knight from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial at the circuit, before the court without a jury. The action was brought against the firm of Macy *&*Co. as makers, and the appellants, Valentine, Wilson *&*Knight together with one Frederick IT. Macy and William IT. Wing as alleged co-partners under the firm name of Macy, Valentine & Co., alleged indorsors of certain promissory notes of the amount in the aggregate of $6,904.53.

*(darker <$> Eaton,*for the appellants.

*A. P. Whitehead,*for the respondent.

Ingalls, J.:

The firm of Macy *&*Co. made the notes in suit, each for the-sum of $2,300. One dated June 20, 1876, another July 1, 1876, and the other February 12, 1876, payable to the order of Macy, Valentino *&*Co. The notes were indorsed in the name of the* last mentioned firm, by Frederick A. Macy, who had been a, member of such firm. Prior to the execution of the notes, the* firm of Macy, Valentine & Co. had been dissolved. The plaintiff' having had dealings with said firm previous to its dissolution was entitled to actual notice thereof previous to receiving the notes, in order to be affected by such dissolution. *(Austin*v. *Holland,*69 N. Y., 572.)

No such notice was established upon the trial, and we are, *418therefore, to inquire whether the plaintiff became a *bona fide*holder of the notes for value ? The plaintiff, by Its president, discounted the notes and gave the makers credit on the books of the bank for the amount, no money ivas actually paid, or thing of value parted with by the plaintiff, upon the strength of the indorsement or the discount. Under such circumstances the plaintiff cannot be regarded the *bona fide*holder of said notes for *value,*as we understand the law as -settled by the adjudications upon that subject. The mere giving of credit by entering the amount on the books, and not actually parting with a dollar upon the strength of the indorsement, cannot be regarded parting with value in the sense which the law contemplates. The parties in whose favor the credit was given might never draw or appropriate any portion of the fund. *(Fulton Bank*v. *Phœnix*Bank, 1 Hall, 562; *Clark*v. Ely, 2 Sandf. Ch. Rep., 166; *West*v. *Exchange Bank,*44 Barb., 175; *Platt*v. *Chapin,*49 How., 318; *Garland*v. *Salem Bank,*9 Mass., 408; *McBride*v. *Farmers Bank,*26 N. Y., 454; *The A. Exchange Bank*v. *Corliss, 46 Barb., 19.)*

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event of the action.

Beady, P. J., concurred.

Present — Beady, P. J., and ING-alls, J.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
### TEX A S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00246- CV Na va so taRe so ur c e s, Lt d. , App e lla nt

v. Heep Pet roleum, Inc. and L arry W. Kimes, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COU NTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRI CT NO. 97-0 1738 , HONO RABLE PETER M. LOWRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Ap p e l l an tN av a s o t a

R e s o urc e s , L t d . , a

n d a p p e l l e e s H e e p P e tro l e um , I n c . an d L arry W. K imes, wish to abate this appe al and have filed a n agr ee d m o t i o n t o ab ate. We gr ant the motion and abate this appe al until October 31, 2005.

__________________________________________ Jan P . P atter son, Justice B efor e Justices B . A. S mith, P atter son and P ur year F iled: S eptember 27, 2005
Exhibit 10.67


 





 


AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO


STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


 


RECITALS


 


The Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Aethlon Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), in a written consent in lieu of a Board Meeting dated February 9, 2016, has
deemed it fair and in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders that Section 5 of the Stock Option Agreement between
the Company and Richard H. Tullis dated July 1, 2013 be amended (the “Amendment”) as set forth below. Accordingly,
the undersigned agree that such section is amended hereby to read in its entirety as follows:


 


 


5.           Cessation
of Service. The option term specified in Paragraph 2 shall terminate (and this option shall cease to be outstanding) prior
to the Expiration Date should any of the following events occur:


 


(a)           If
the Optionee’s service is terminated for any reason other than death or disability, then the Optionee may exercise this option,
only to the extent that the option would have been exercisable upon the date of such termination (the “Termination Date”),
no later than thirty-six (36) months after the Termination Date, or the Expiration Date, whichever occurs first.


 


(b)           If
the Optionee’s service is terminated because of the Optionee’s death or disability (or the Optionee dies within thirty-six
(36) months after a termination other than for cause or because of the Optionee’s disability), then this option may be exercised
only to the extent that it would have been exercisable by the Optionee on the Termination Date and must be exercised by the Optionee
(or the Optionee’s legal representative) no later than thirty-six (36) months after the Termination Date, or the Expiration
Date, whichever occurs first.


 


(c)           Notwithstanding
the provisions above, if the Optionee’s service is terminated for cause, neither the Optionee, the Optionee’s estate
nor such other person who may then hold this option shall be entitled to exercise it with respect to any Option Shares whatsoever.


 


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this Amendment on this 9th day of February, 2016.


 


 


	 	Aethlon Medical, Inc., a Nevada corporation	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	 /s/ James B. Frakes	 
	 	 	James B. Frakes	 
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer	 


 


	 	Optionee	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	 /s/ Richard H. Tullis	 
	 	 	Richard H. Tullis
Exhibit 4.4


 


 


KITOV PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS LTD.


 





 


 


June 28, 2016


 


 


 





The Bank of New York Mellon


Depositary Receipts


101 Barclay Street


New York, New York 10286


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to that certain Warrant
Agent Agreement, dated November 25, 2015 (the "Agreement") between Kitov Pharmaceuticals Holdings Ltd., a company
incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel (the "Company"), and The Bank of New York Mellon (the "Warrant
Agent"). Words used but not defined in this letter that are defined in the Agreement have the meanings assigned to them
in the Agreement.


 


The Company is engaged in a subsequent public
offering (the "Offering") of Units consisting of ADSs and Warrants. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
the Agreement, the Company may instruct the Warrant Agent to issue additional Warrants in connection with the Offering.


 


 


 






     


     


    

 


 


If the foregoing is
in accordance with your understanding, please countersign and return a copy of this letter, whereupon this letter will constitute
an agreement between the Company and the Warrant Agent as of the date first written above.


 


Very truly yours,


 


KITOV PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS
LTD.


 


 


By: ___________________________


Name:


Title:


 


Acknowledged and agreed:


 


the
bank of new york mellon


 


 


By: ___________________________





Name:


Title:
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JSPAZ Guardian Energy Services, * From the 118 th District Court

LLC d/b/a Guardian Energy Services, of Howard County,

and Jackson Thompson, as Guarantor, Trial Court No. 54288

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 0

- 00 2 45

- C V * June 10 , 2021

Avalanche Equipment, LLC, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.

, Trotter , J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Appellants’ agreed motion to dismiss t his appeal

and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with

this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this

appeal are taxed against Appellants.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2290 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 15:24:19 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2290 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 15:24:19 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2290 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 15:24:19 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2290 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 15:24:19 Page 4 of

4
Exhibit 32.3

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICOA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date  November 11, 2005                   By:       /s/ Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.
                                                    -----------------------
                                          Name:     Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.
                                          Title:    Vice President Finance and
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided Sherb & co., LP and will be
retained by ICOA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: dchambers Date Created: 8/5/2019

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 9

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

aty Peter J. Benvenutti pbenvenutti@kellerbenvenutti.com

TOTAL: 1

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Prime Clerk):

ANNIE DUONG, ESQ. McCormick Barstow LLP 7647 North Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93720

GREGORY A. BRAY, ESQ. DANIEL B. DENNY, ESQ. Milbank LLP 2029 Century Park East

33rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067

ALAN J. STONE, ESQ. Milbank LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001

EREZ E. GILAD, ESQ. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038

FRANK A. MEROLA, ESQ. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 2029 Century Park East Los

Angeles, CA 90067

BRIAN S. HERMANN, ESQ. ALAN W. KORNBERG, ESQ. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &

Garrison 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019

MICHAEL H. STRUB, JR., ESQ. Irell & Manella LLP 1800 Avenue of the Stars Suite 900 Los

Angeles, CA 90067

JOHN H. VERAJA, ESQ. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP One Liberty Plaza Nwe York, NY

10006

TOTAL: 8

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3358-3 Filed: 08/01/19 Entered: 08/01/19 19:23:08 Page 1

of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

Robert A. Julian (SBN 88469) 

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 628.208.6434 

Facsimile: 310.820.8859 

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com 

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com 

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496) 

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

Telephone: 310.442.8875 

Facsimile: 310.820.8859 

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com 

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com 

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors 

 Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

□ Affects PG& E Corporation 

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

■ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3653 Filed: 08/22/19 Entered: 08/22/19 07:25:45 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3653 Filed: 08/22/19 Entered: 08/22/19 07:25:45 Page 2 of

3
EXHIBIT A

Notice Parties Service List

Served as set forth below

DESCRIPTION NAME NOTICE NAME ADDRESS EMAIL

Counsel to Debtors Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Rachael Foust, Jessica Liou, Matthew Goren

767 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10153‐0119

stephen.karotkin@weil.rachael.foust@weil.comjessica.liou@weil.commatthew.goren@weil.c

Counsel to Debtors Keller & Benvenutti LLP Attn: Tobias Keller, Jane Kim

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

tkeller@kellerbenvenutjkim@kellerbenvenutti.

Debtors

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Attn: Janet Loduca

77 Beale StreetP.O. Box 770000San Francisco, CA 94105 

Office of the United States Trustee  Office of the United States Trustee 

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq. & Timothy Lafreddi, Esq

450 Golden Gate Avenue5th Floor, Suite #05‐0153San Francisco, CA 94102

James.L.Snyder@usdoj.timothy.s.laffredi@usdo

Counsel for the Official Committee of  Unsecured Creditors Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Samuel A. Khalil

55 Hudson YardsNew York, NY 10001‐2163

ddunne@milbank.comskhalil@milbank.com 

Counsel for the Official Committee of  Unsecured Creditors Milbank LLP

Attn:  Paul S. Aronzon, Gregory A. Bray, Thomas R. Kreller

2029 Century Park E, 33rd FloorLos Angeles, CA 90067

Paronzon@milbank.comGbray@milbank.comTKreller@milbank.com 

Fee Examiner Attn: Bruce A. Markell

541 N. Fairbanks Court, Suite 2200Chicago, IL 60611‐3710

bamexampge@gmail.pge@legaldecoder.cotraceyrgallegos@gma

Counsel to Fee Examiner  Scott H. McNutt Scott H. McNutt

324 Warren RoadSan Mateo, CA  94402 smcnutt@ml‐sf.com 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3653 Filed: 08/22/19 Entered: 08/22/19 07:25:45 Page 

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENT OF EQUITY AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,307
<SECURITIES>                                    18,834
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,898
<PP&E>                                           2,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,712
<SALES>                                         13,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,444
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[663 NE2d 319, 639 NYS2d 1007]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Dillon and Roy Hetzel, Appellants.

Decided December 27, 1995

*886APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gary Abramson,*Goshen, for Daniel Dillon, appellant.

*Gurda, Gurda & Smith,*Middletown *(Alex Smith*of counsel), for Roy Hetzel, appellant.

*Francis D. Phillips, II, District Attorney*of Orange County, Goshen *(David R. Huey*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

During the course of a high-speed automobile chase having its inception in a traffic violation, the pursuing State Trooper observed the passenger in the fleeing vehicle, defendant Dillon, throw two small bags onto the roadway. The chase continued for another 10 to 15 miles until the driver, defendant Hetzel, was eventually stopped. Approximately 3.94 ounces of a white powder containing cocaine and eight hypodermic needles were recovered from the roadside at the point where the bags had been thrown.

There was sufficient circumstantial evidence from which the Grand Jury could have inferred that defendants Dillon and Hetzel had knowledge that the cocaine weighed more than the statutory minimum of an aggregate two ounces, and therefore, County Court erred in reducing count one of the indictment from criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [1]) to criminal possession of *887a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03).

Given the lesser standards for measuring the sufficiency of Grand Jury instructions *(see, People v Darby,*75 NY2d 449, 454; *People v Calbud, Inc.,*49 NY2d 389, 394; *see also,*CPL 190.30 [7]), we also conclude that the instructions in this case were adequate.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50925

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL CHAVEZ-MORALES, also known as Javier Perea-Martinez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-137-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Manuel Chavez-Morales

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50925

2

7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.