alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5109 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, as the ‘‘W. Ronald 

Coale Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2014 

Mr. MCNERNEY (for himself, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. COOK, 

Mr. DENHAM, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. COSTA, Ms. LOFGREN, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. MCKEON, Ms. CHU, Mrs. NEGRETE MCLEOD, 

Mr. CALVERT, Ms. HAHN, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. 

ROHRABACHER, Mr. ISSA, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. 

ESHOO, Mr. LAMALFA, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. BERA of California, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. NUNES, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. 

SHERMAN, Mr. RUIZ, Ms. BASS, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, 

Mr. TAKANO, Ms. WATERS, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. VARGAS, and Mr. 

VALADAO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in Stockton, California, as the ‘‘W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5109 IH

1 SECTION 1. W. RONALD COALE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1048 West Robinhood Drive in 

5 Stockton, California, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘W. Ronald Coale Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W. Ronald Coale Me11 morial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Clemma A. Winters, Respondent, v. Jacob B. Smith and another, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with costs of the appeal to be paid by the appellant out of the estate.

Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zhijuan Guo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
                  /s/
      Zhijuan GuoName:
      Zhijuan GuoTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)




Date: 
June 23, 2009




This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Benjamin Tuthill, Appellant, v. Mary R. Goss and Another, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer in twenty days on payment of costs.—

Pratt, J.:

The opinion at Special Term covers the question so fully that further discussion is unnecessary. The statements *m*the 8th subdivision of the defendant’s pleading are appropriate for an answer but out of place in a demurrer. They were, therefore, properly disregarded at Special Term as not being properly before the court. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs, with leave to answer on payment of costs.

Brown, P. J., and Dykman, J., concurred.
Form TRANSC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Northern District of California

In re Debtor(s):

PG&E Corporation

Case No.: 19−30088 DM 11

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT

AND DEADLINES RELATED TO RESTRICTION AND REDACTION

A transcript of the proceeding held on August 9, 2019 was filed on August 12, 2019. The following deadlines apply:

The parties have until Monday, August 19, 2019 to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this

transcript. The deadline for filing a request for redaction is Tuesday, September 3, 2019.

If a request for redaction is filed, the redacted transcript is due Thursday, September 12, 2019.

If no such notice is filed, the transcript may be made available for remote electronic access upon expiration of the

restriction period, which is Tuesday, November 12, 2019, unless extended by court order.

To review the transcript for redaction purposes, you may purchase a copy from the transcriber,

Jason Gottlieb

Attn: Jason Gottlieb, Dir. of Tran. Ops.

7227 N 16th St. #207

Phoenix, AZ 85020

or you may view the document at the clerk's office public terminal.

Dated: 8/14/19 For the Court:

Edward J. Emmons

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3502-1 Filed: 08/12/19 Entered: 08/12/19 09:00:41 Page 1

of 1
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D22- 1733 LT Case No. 202 0- CF
- 027715 -A

_____________________________ MARK ELLIOT SOMERSET , Appella nt, v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee .

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Tesha Ballou , Judge . Ma tthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ma rk Elliot Somerset, Bowling Green, pro se. Ashley Mo ody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. August 1 5, 2023 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED .2 EDWARDS , C . J ., JAY , and HARRIS , J J., concur.

________ _____________________ Not fin al until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC.**

          Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I Philip E. Norwood, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Summit Bancshares, Inc. (the “Corporation”) hereby certify, to my knowledge,  that:

|   | (i)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of the Corporation fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in the report. |

Dated:     November 10, 2005

|   | By:    | /s/ Philip E. Norwood                                                              |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                    |
|   | Name:  | Philip E. Norwood                                                                  |
|   | Title: | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer      (Principal Executive Officer) |

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b) (32) of Regulation SK and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended  Quarterly  Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, James A. Hayward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1)      The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of  1934;
                    and

           (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly   presents,
                    in all material respects, the financial condition and result
                    of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Applied  DNA  Sciences,  Inc.  and will be  retained by Applied DNA
Sciences,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date:  October 10, 2006                             By: /s/JAMES A HAYWARD
                                                       -------------------
                                                    James A. Hayward
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5108 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5108

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To establish the Law School Clinic Certification Program of the United 
      States Patent and Trademark Office, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USPTO LAW SCHOOL CLINIC CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--The Law School Clinic Certification Program of 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as implemented by the 
Office, is established as a program entitled the ``Law School Clinic 
Certification Program''. The Program shall allow students enrolled in a 
participating law school's clinic to practice patent and trademark law 
before the Office by drafting, filing, and prosecuting patent or 
trademark applications, or both, on a pro-bono basis for clients that 
qualify for assistance from the law school's clinic. The Director shall 
establish regulations and procedures for application to and 
participation in the Program. All law schools accredited by the 
American Bar Association are eligible for participation in the Program, 
and shall be examined for acceptance using identical criteria 
established by the Director. The Program shall be in effect for the 10-
year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Report on the Program.--The Director shall, not later than the 
last day of the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate a report on the Program, describing the 
number of law schools and law students participating in the Program, 
the work done through the Program, the benefits of the Program, and any 
recommendations of the Director for modifications to the Program.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Office.--The term ``Office'' means the United States 
        Patent and Trademark Office.
            (2) Program.--The term ``Program'' means the Law School 
        Clinic Certification Program established in subsection (a).
            (3) Director.--The term ``Director'' means the Under 
        Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of 
        the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5108

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To establish the Law School Clinic Certification Program of the United 
      States Patent and Trademark Office, and for other purposes.
```
#### Thomas Roberts, Appellant, v. Caroline D. Ely and others, Respondents.

—Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2818 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 09:18:56 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2818 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 09:18:56 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2818 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 09:18:56 Page 3 of

3
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5134 

AN ACT 

To extend the National Advisory Committee on Institutional 

Quality and Integrity and the Advisory Committee on 

Student Financial Assistance for one year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5134 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NATIONAL ADVISORY COM2 MITTEE ON INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY AND IN3 TEGRITY. 

4 Section 114(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

5 (20 U.S.C. 1011c(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON STU8 DENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE. 

9 Section 491(k) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

10 (20 U.S.C. 1098(k)) is amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5134 

AN ACT 

To extend the National Advisory Committee on Infor one year. sory Committee on Student Financial Assistance stitutional Quality and Integrity and the Advi-
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5166 

To direct the National Counsel on Disability to conduct a review of certain 

standards under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2014 

Ms. TITUS (for herself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, 

the Judiciary, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the National Counsel on Disability to conduct 

a review of certain standards under the Americans with 

Disabilities Act of 1990. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Travel and Tourism 

5 For All Act’’. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5166 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVIEW AND REPORT BY NATIONAL COUNSEL ON 

2 DISABILITY. 

3 The National Counsel on Disability established under 

4 section 400 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 

5 780) shall— 

6 (1) review the implementation of— 

7 (A) the Americans with Disabilities Act of 

8 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) with respect to 

9 the travel, tourism, and hospitality industries; 

10 and 

11 (B) the 2010 ADA standards for public ac12 commodations and commercial facilities under 

13 subpart D of part 36 of title 28, Code of Fed14 eral Regulations, and appendices B and D of 

15 part 1191 of title 36, Code of Federal Regula16 tions; and 

17 (2) not later than 2 years after the date of en18 actment of this Act, submit to Congress a report 

19 on— 

20 (A) the review conducted under paragraph 

21 (1); and 

22 (B) recommendations for improvement in 

23 the implementation of the Act and regulations 

24 described in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Emanuel Klein, Respondent, v. John A. Petri, as Administrator, etc., of Conrad Petri, Deceased, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and’ new trial ordered,, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the alleged contract to pay the stun of $500 is not established by satisfactory evidence.

Jenks, P. J., Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred; Thomas and Woodward, JJ., dissented.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2997 Filed: 07/16/19 Entered: 07/16/19 10:08:38 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2997 Filed: 07/16/19 Entered: 07/16/19 10:08:38 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2997 Filed: 07/16/19 Entered: 07/16/19 10:08:38 Page 3 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3422 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 14:49:47 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3422 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 14:49:47 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3422 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 14:49:47 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3422 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 14:49:47 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3422 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 14:49:47 Page 5 of

5
June 26, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GRAHAM R. WILLIAMS, HERBERT H. PRATT AND ZICIX 

CORPORATION, Appellants

NO. 14-14-00436-CV V.

MAZUMA HOLDING CORP., Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

June 5, 2014, denial by operation of law of their motion to dismiss. Having 

considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Graham R. Williams, Herbert H. Pratt and Zicix Corporation, jointly and 

severally.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
----

| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/ KURT      JENSEN             |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Kurt      Jensen                 |   |
|   |   | Principal      Financial Officer |   |
|   |   | February      29, 2008           |   |
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1933-1 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 15:50:06 Page 1

of 2
COMPENSATION BY PROFESSIONAL 

MARCH 1, 2019 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2019 

The attorneys and paraprofessionals who rendered legal services in these Chapter 11 Cases from 

March 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019 (the “Fee Period”) are: 

NAME OF 

PROFESSIONAL: POSITION 

YEAR 

ADMITTED 

HOURLY

RATE 

TOTAL

HOURS

BILLED 

TOTAL 

COMPENSATION 

Tobias S. Keller Partner 1990 800 45.5 $36,400 

Peter J. Benvenutti Partner 1974 800 64.1 $51,280 

Jane Kim Partner 20031 650 113.1 $67,990 

Keith A. McDaniels Of Counsel 1997 600 67.9 $40,740 

Thomas B. Rupp Associate 2011 400 91.9 $36,760 

Jacob Bodden Paralegal Trainee N/A 150 99.1 $14,865 

Total Professionals: 481.6 $248,035.00 

1 Member of the California Bar since 2014

 PROFESSIONALS 

TOTALS: 

BLENDED RATE 

(rounded to nearest 

dollar) 

TOTAL HOURS 

BILLED 

TOTAL 

COMPENSATION 

Partners and Counsel 676 290.6 $196,410 

Associates 400 91.9 $36,760 

Blended Attorney Rate 610 382.5 $233,170 

Paraprofessionals and other non-legal staff 150 99.1 $14,865 

Total Fees Incurred 515 481.6 $248,035.00 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1933-1 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 15:50:06 Page 2

of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5050 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5050

       To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2014

 Mr. Simpson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``May 31, 1918 Act Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) 1918 act.--The term ``1918 Act'' means the Act of May 
        31, 1918 (40 Stat. 592, chapter 88).
            (2) Fort hall townsite.--The term ``Fort Hall Townsite'' 
        means the land that was taken out of trust by being set aside 
        or set apart under the 1918 Act on the Fort Hall Reservation, 
        consisting of approximately 120 acres in the East Half of the 
        Northeast Quarter in Section 35 and the West Half of the West 
        Half of the Northwest Quarter in Section 36, Township 4 South, 
        Range 34 East, Boise Meridian, Idaho, based upon a survey 
        completed on May 19, 1921, and depicted on the document 
        entitled ``Plat of the Townsite of Fort Hall'' on file with 
        Bingham County, Idaho and the Tribes.
            (3) Tribes.--The term ``Tribes'' means the Shoshone-Bannock 
        Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation.

SEC. 3. REPEAL.

    The 1918 Act is repealed.

SEC. 4. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL.

    (a) In General.--The Tribes shall have the exclusive right of first 
refusal to purchase at fair market value any land--
            (1) within the Fort Hall Townsite; and
            (2) offered for sale.
    (b) Acquired Land Held in Trust.--The United States shall hold in 
trust for the benefit of the Tribes or a member of the Tribes, as 
applicable--
            (1) any land owned or acquired by the Tribes or a member of 
        the Tribes within the Fort Hall Townsite before the date of 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (2) any land owned or acquired by the Tribes or a member of 
        the Tribes within the Fort Hall Townsite on or after the date 
        of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 5. EFFECT.

    Nothing in this Act affects any valid right to any land set aside 
or set apart under the 1918 Act.
                                 <all>
```