alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

81,7('67$7(6%$1.5837&<&2857

1257+(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

Case No. 

Chapter

In re

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

, whose business address and telephone number is

'HEWRUV











 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of

having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of

California on a pro hac vice basis, representing

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application

will constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.



(1'2)25'(5



PG&E Corporation

19-30088

11

Ameneh Bordi

Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 601 Lexington Avenue 

New York, New York 10022 

(212) 446-4800

New York

Calpine Corporation

Ameneh Bordi

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

601 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10022

Telephone: (212) 446-4800

ameneh.bordi@kirkland.com Signed and Filed: August 13, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

August 13, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3532 Filed: 08/13/19 Entered: 08/13/19 14:50:34 Page 1 of

1
Exhibit A-2 

Panel of Mediators for Standard Mediations Pursuant to Securities ADR and Related 

Procedures Order

 Hon. William J. Cahill (Ret.) 

 Ambassador David L. Carden (Ret.) 

 Mark B. Helm, Esq. 

 Hon. Randall J. Newsome (Ret.) 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13744-2 Filed: 05/17/23 Entered: 05/17/23 16:37:49 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of
            2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(A) And (B))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,
            Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in
            his capacity as an officer of Metaldyne Corporation (the "Company") that the
            Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2003
            fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
            report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
            results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered
            by such Report.

Date: August 12, 2003

/s/ Jeffrey M. Stafeil Jeffrey M.
                        Stafeil Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Chief
                        Accounting Officer and Authorized Signatory)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIAN WANG,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER

, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 73302

Agency No. A206

- 345

- 023

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 27, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Jian Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals ’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s

decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** T he panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 3 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 73302

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings,

applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the

REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010). We

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supp orts the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies between Wang ’s testimony and documentary evidence as

to the date his father died and the number of times he was interrogated

. See i d . at

1048 (adverse credibility determination r easonable under “the totality of

circumstances”). Wang ’s expla nations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See

Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In his opening brief, Wang does

not challenge the agency’s determination that in the absence of credible testimony,

his documentary evidence did not establish eligibility for asylum. Thus, in the

absence of credible testimony, in this case, Wang ’s asylum and withholding of

removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1 156 (9th Cir. 2013).

In his opening brief, Wang fails to challenge the agency’s denial of his CAT

claim. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues

not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE IN CIVIL CASES

(See Supreme Court Order in Special Supplement to Texas Rules of Court, 1997, Blue Book/page 62)

(Secretary to complete entire top portion at time opinion is delivered – have signed by authoring judge)

CASE NO.: 14-13-00532-CV DATE CASE FILED: 6/19/13

STYLE: In Re Robert Primo, Relator

COUNTY: Harris 

DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT OF CASE: Original Proceeding 

PANEL: Busby Boyce Jamison PER CURIAM YES 

 (Credit) 

OPINION ISSUED: August 30, 2013_ OPINION DECISION: Denied

RECOMMEND: DESTROY YES HISTORICAL 

COMMENTS: 

SIGNED: /s/ _Deborah Young ___ DATE: 08/30/13

(Attorney)

–––––––––––––––––––––––––**FOR CLERK’S USE ONLY**––––––––––––––––––––––––––

MANDATE ISSUED: ___________________________________________________________

LETTER TO STATE ARCHIVES (date): ____________________________________________

COMMENTS: _________________________________________________________________

–––––––––––––––––––––––––**FOR CLERK’S USE ONLY**––––––––––––––––––––––––––

(Dispose of 10 years after final disposition)

DATE DESTROYED: ___________________________________________________________

DATE SENT TO STATE ARCHIVES FOR PERMANENT RETENTION: ___________________
Exhibit 10.18


 


LOAN AGREEMENT made and entered into
as of the 1st day of Nov. 2014 by and between Grove Industries Ltd. (“Grove”) and Full Spectrum Inc.
(“Full Spectrum”).


 


		1.	Loan. Grove hereby agrees to loan to Full Spectrum the sum of US$210,000 (“Loan”)
to be used towards manufacturing product for PEPCO and/or North Western. The principle amount of the Loan, with the fee as provided
below, shall be repayable by March 16, 2015 (the “Maturity Date”). Full Spectrum have the right of prepaying the whole
or part of the Loan owing hereunder at any time without notice or penalty.



 


		2.	Fee/Interest on Loan Provided the loan is repaid on or prior to Maturity Date the fee for
the Loan shall be $16,800. If the Loan is not repaid by the Maturity Date then in addition to the said fee interest with respect
to the principle amount of the Loan shall be accrued at a rate of 18% per annum from the Maturity Date until repayment in full.
The accrued interest will be repaid at the time of repayment of the principle amount of the Loan.



 


		3.	Miscellaneous. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware. This
agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned
has set forth its signature as of the date first written above,


 


	Grove Industries Ltd.	 	Full Spectrum Inc.
	 	 	 
	/s/
    [ILLEGIBLE]	 	/s/ Stewart Kantor
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 20328 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DONNELL HAFFORD , also known as Donnell Halford , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07

- CR

- 426

- 1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donnell Hafford has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hafford h a s not fil ed a response. We have reviewed cou nsel’s brief and the relevant p arts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-20328 Document: 00513472512 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016No. 15

- 20328

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to w ithdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-20328 Document: 00513472512 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
Order entered September 17, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00313-CR

CARLA GAY JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 11

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA17-40154-L

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 13, 2018 second motion for extension of time 

to file her brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before 

September 27, 2018. Appellant is cautioned that the failure to file a brief by that date may result 

in the appeal being abated for a hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).

.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## New Webinar! Active Judging in Eviction Court

Eviction dockets are often fast-paced and high-volume, which can create challenges for the overwhelming numbers of litigants appearing without counsel and struggling to understand the legal process and their options. Judges from three different jurisdictions will describe how they have adopted principles of active judging to increase understanding, ensure due process, and expand access to resources for litigants in eviction court.

NCSC will be hosting this webinar on Wednesday, May 17th, 2023, at 3:00PM EST.

Register here: Webinar Registration – Zoom

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                  
|----- |  | -----------------
|      |  | /s/    AVIV EFRAT
|Name: |  | Aviv Efrat       

Date: December 12, 2007
#### Julia F. Kirtz, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Hezekiah Peck, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the defendant to have ten days from the entry and service of the order of affirmance to avail himself of the leave given by the Special Term order.
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund I (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three
month period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:





(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    LEO F. WELLS,
IIILeo F. Wells, III Chief Executive Officer





August 12, 2002
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0448. JEROME CLARKE v. THE STATE.

In 1981, Jerome Clarke pled guilty to malice murder. Years later, he filed a

request to proceed in forma pauperis and a “motion to request to entertain the merits

for autrefois acquit.” The trial court denied the motions, and Clarke filed this direct

appeal. 

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” See Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be

imposed for the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See

OCGA § 17-10-30 (b); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012)

(Hunstein, C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524, 524 (1) (322

SE2d 711) (1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a

sentence of death or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of

murder”). The Supreme Court’sjurisdiction over murder casesincludes appealsfrom

orders resolving post-judgment motions in such cases. See Simpson v. State, 292 Ga.

764 (740 SE2d 124) (2013) (appeal from denial of motion attacking murder

convictions as void).

October 03, 2019
Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/03/2019
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5030 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5030

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 13500 SW 250 Street in Princeton, Florida, as the ``Corporal 
           Christian A. Guzman Rivera Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL CHRISTIAN A. GUZMAN RIVERA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 13500 SW 250 Street in Princeton, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Corporal Christian A. Guzman Rivera Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any references in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Corporal Christian A. Guzman Rivera Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5030

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 13500 SW 250 Street in Princeton, Florida, as the ``Corporal 
           Christian A. Guzman Rivera Post Office Building''.
```
#### In the Matter of Catherine Stone, Respondent, v Richard Stone, Appellant.

Submitted September 18, 1995;

decided November 30, 1995

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Family Court’s April 16, 1993 order, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 1 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 2 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 3 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 4 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 5 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 6 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 7 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 8 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3048    Filed: 07/18/19    Entered: 07/18/19 10:17:20    Page 9 of9
**MIDSOUTH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES** **EXHIBIT 11**COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (Unaudited)             **First Quarter**  **First Quarter**   **March 31,**  **March 31,**   **2005**  **2004** **BASIC**                 Earnings:        Income applicable to common stock $1,923,423  $1,660,948                 Shares:        Weighted average number ofcommon shares outstanding  4,440,994   3,980,421                 Earnings per common share:        Income applicable to common stock $0.43  $0.42                 **DILUTED**                 Earnings:        Net income $1,923,423  $1,660,948                 Weighted average number ofcommon shares outstanding  4,440,994   3,980,421          Assuming exercise of options, reduced bythe number of shares which could havebeen purchased with the proceeds fromexercise of such options at theaverage issue price  179,940   187,270                 Weighted average number of commonshares outstanding, as adjusted  4,620,934   4,167,691                 Fully diluted earnings per common share $0.42  $0.40
#### Henry H. Skinner and others, Administrators, v. Prospect Park and Coney Island Railroad Company.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
Exhibit 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell
International  Corporation  for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2005,  I, R. Mark
Richards, Chief Executive Officer of Intercell International Corporation, hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

        a.     such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Intercell  International
               Corporation  for the quarter ended June 30, 2005,  fully complies
               with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and

        b.     the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
               of Intercell International Corporation for the quarter ended June
               30,  2005,  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,   the
               financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Intercell
               International Corporation.




                                           /s/R. Mark Richards
                                           ---------------------------
                                           R. Mark Richards, Chief
                                           Executive Officer




Date:    August 12, 2005



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Intercell  International  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by
Intercell International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.