alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, 
Clinical Trials Review Committee.
    Date: June 28-29, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Keary A Cope, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 7190, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-2222, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e2d213e2b252f0e232f27226020272660292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="77141807121c16371a161e1b59191e1f59101801">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 19, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-12550 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4936 

To amend section 292 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to require 

the Attorney General to appoint counsel for unaccompanied alien children 

and aliens with serious mental disabilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2014 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself, Ms. BASS, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, 

Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Ms. CHU, Ms. DELBENE, and Mr. O’ROURKE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 292 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to require the Attorney General to appoint counsel 

for unaccompanied alien children and aliens with serious 

mental disabilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vulnerable Immigrant 

5 Voice Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4936 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN CERTAIN CASES. 

2 (a) APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR UNACCOM3 PANIED ALIEN CHILDREN AND ALIENS WITH A SERIOUS

4 MENTAL DISABILITY.—Section 292 of the Immigration 

5 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1362) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘In any’’; 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘(at no expense to the Govern8 ment)’’; 

9 (3) by striking ‘‘he shall’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

10 person shall’’; and 

11 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) Except as provided in subsection (c), the Gov13 ernment is not required to provide counsel to aliens under 

14 subsection (a). 

15 ‘‘(c) Notwithstanding subsection (b), the Attorney 

16 General shall appoint counsel, at the expense of the Gov17 ernment if necessary (to the extent provided in appropria18 tions Acts), to represent an alien in a removal proceeding 

19 who— 

20 ‘‘(1) has been determined by the Secretary to 

21 be an unaccompanied alien child (as defined in sec22 tion 462 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 

23 U.S.C. 279(g))); or 

24 ‘‘(2) is incompetent to represent himself or her25 self due to a serious mental disability that would be 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4936 IH

1 included in section 3(1) of the Americans with Dis2 abilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102(1)).’’. 

3 (b) FUNDING.—There are authorized to be appro4 priated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the 

5 amendments made by this section. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.8


 


 NuGene International, Inc. (NUGN)


 


June 15, 2016


 


Theodore Schwarz 


 


Dear Theodore:


 


On behalf of NuGene International, Inc., I am pleased to invite
you to join the Board of Directors of NuGene International, Inc. Our Board and management firmly believes that the future promises
to be exciting for NuGene and we feel your experience and leadership in the skincare arena will be invaluable as we grow our company
and advance our groundbreaking collection of antiaging products.


 


The Board of Directors plays a central role in NuGene's success
and each Board Member is a business professional who delivers sound business direction, expertise, knowledge, and professional
relationships that advance the company's goals and objectives. Additionally, the Board participates in policy development, major
decision making and investor relations activities. The Board meets four times a year and on occasion, members of our Board represent
NuGene at key fundraising events. The terms of the members of our Company’s Board of Directors are prescribed by our Company’s
bylaws and subject to periodic nomination and election by the Company’s shareholders.


 


In connection with your service, you will be paid $2,500 for each
Board of Directors meeting attended. Additionally, you will be issued 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that will
vest at the rate of 166,666 shares per year, over a three-year period.


 


I am excited about NuGene's future and I look forward to the solid
leadership, fresh ideas and other contributions that you will bring to the company.


 


Very truly yours,


 


	/s/ Ali Kharazi	 
	Ali Kharazmi, CEO	 
	NuGene International, Inc.	 
	Dated: June 15, 2016	 
	 	 
	Accepted:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Theodore Schwarz	 
	Theodore Schwarz	 
	Dated: June 15, 2016
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 1 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 2 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 3 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 4 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 5 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 6 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 7 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 8 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 9 of

36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 10

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 11

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 12

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 13

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 14

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 15

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 16

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 17

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 18

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 19

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 20

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 21

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 22

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 23

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 24

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 25

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 26

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 27

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 28

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 29

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 30

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 31

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 32

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 33

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 34

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 35

of 36
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 36

of 36
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. AG Docket No. 72

GEORGE RICHARD MAR S H ALL SAPONARO * September Term, 2021

C O R R E C T E D O R D E R

Upon consideration of the certified copy of the Order of the Supreme Court of New

Jersey dated January 3, 2022 , wherein the Respondent, George Richard Marshall

Saponaro , was suspended from the practice of law for one year for violating the New

Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct; the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action,

filed pursuant to Maryland Rule s 19

- 721(a) and 19

- 737; Petitioner’s Response to this

Court's Show Cause Order, dated May 31, 2022 ; and there being no response to the Show

Cause Order filed by the Respondent

, it is this day 15th of June 20 22

,

ORDERED , by the Court of Appeals of Maryland

, that the Respondent, George

Richard Marshall Saponaro , be, and hereby is, indefinitely suspended , from the practice

of law in the State of Maryland, with the right to petition for reinstatement after he is

reinstated to practice law in New Jersey ; and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of George Richard

Marshall Saponaro from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify shall that fact to

the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all

jud icial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19

- 761(b).

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief JudgeThe correction notice(s) for this opinion(s) can be found here:

https://mdcourts.gov/sites/default/files/import/app ellate/correctionnotices/coa/72a21agcn.pdf
ORDER SUSPENDING ORDER FOR PAYMENT 

OF STATE AND FEDERAL TAXES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: 212 310 8000 

Fax: 212 310 8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: 415 496 6723 

Fax: 650 636 9251 

Proposed Attorneys for Debtors 

and Debtors in Possession

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

 - and – 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088(DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

ORDER SUSPENDING ORDER FOR 

PAYMENT OF STATE AND FEDERAL 

TAXES 

Date: January 31, 2019 

Time: 10:00 a.m. (Pacific) 

Place: United States Bankruptcy Court, 

 Courtroom 17, 16th Floor 

 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 

San Francisco, CA 94102

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Signed and Filed: February 4, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

February 04, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 271 Filed: 02/04/19 Entered: 02/04/19 14:00:14 Page 1 of 2
ORDER SUSPENDING ORDER FOR PAYMENT 

OF STATE AND FEDERAL TAXES

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Order for Payment of State and Federal Taxes [Docket No. 163] is suspended as of 

January 29, 2019 and the debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned cases are not required 

to comply with the provisions thereof. 

** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 271 Filed: 02/04/19 Entered: 02/04/19 14:00:14 Page 2 of 2
#### San Remo Copper Mining Company, Respondent, v. Elie J. Moneuse, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6528
JOSEPH P. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ED BANKS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-562-5-H) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 4, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph P. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause toappeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Banks , No. CA-95-562-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1907    Filed: 05/08/19    Entered: 05/08/19 07:26:50    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1907    Filed: 05/08/19    Entered: 05/08/19 07:26:50    Page 2 of2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2987 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 16:58:24 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2987 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 16:58:24 Page 2 of

2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5129 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5129

 To require notification of a Governor of a State if an unaccompanied 
        alien child is placed for custody and care in the State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2014

  Mr. Smith of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. Fortenberry, and Mr. Terry) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require notification of a Governor of a State if an unaccompanied 
        alien child is placed for custody and care in the State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``UAC State Notification Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF STATE GOVERNORS.

    Section 235 of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims 
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (8 U.S.C. 1232) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Notification to States.--In the case of an unaccompanied 
alien child who is in Federal custody by reason of the child's 
immigration status, the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the 
Secretary of Homeland Security shall notify the Governor of a State not 
later than 48 hours prior to the placement of the child in the care of 
a proposed custodian located in such State.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Bridget Grier. Respondent, v. The City of Lockport, Appellant.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
#### FLORENCE VAN VALKENBURGH aud JOHN L. VAN VALKENBURGH, Administrators, etc., Respondents, *v.*THE AMERICAN POPULAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

*Life inwwram.ce*— wa/rranties—Conditions *ly which, 'policy is avoided*— hv/rden *of proof as to, rests on company.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried.

The action was brought upon a policy of insurance issued upon the life of Lawrence H. Van Valkenburgh, deceased.

The court at General Term, after holding that the case of *Fitch*v. *The American Popular Life Ins. Co.*(59 N.Y., 564) establishes, that the defense of a breach of warranty could not be interposed in this action, and that the only defense available arising from any misstatement or misrepresentations of the assured in his application, must arise out of fraud, proceeded as follows: “ The only other defense suggested by the answer is, that the insured died of a disease induced or aggravated by intemperance, whereby, by the terms of the policy, it was to become void. One of the points made by the defendant relates to the burden of proof upon this subject. The court held it was upon the defendant; to which exception was taken. This ruling seems to accord with general principles. The obligation of proving any fact lies upon the party who substantially asserts the affirmative of the issue. (1 Gr. Ev., § 74; *Piedmont cmd A. Life Ins. Co.*v. Ewing, 2 Otto, 377.) This is one of many conditions upon which the policy was to become void. They are, therefore, conditions in avoidance of the policy, and are to be alleged by way of answer, and proved as substantive defenses. (2 Gr. Ev., § 402.) They are not conditions precedent. In eases of suicide, I understand, it has been held that the burden of proof is upon the defendant where that fact is relied upon to avoid the policy. (Bliss on Ins., 584, 585, and cases cited.)

But if any error upon this subject was committed it was after-*584wards remedied by a full investigation of the facts pertaining thereto.”

*Amasa J. Parker,*for the appellant. *George Bliss,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

BoaedmaN, J.;

Learned, P. J., concurred.

Present — Leaened, P. J., Bocees and Boaedman, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1997 MASCOTECH, INC. 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,340
<SECURITIES>                                    49,530
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     71,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               334,930
<PP&E>                                         641,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               (254,450)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,205,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,140
<BONDS>                                        691,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,800
<COMMON>                                        37,540
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,205,210
<SALES>                                        233,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               233,440
<CGS>                                          177,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  177,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of NovaRay Medical, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William W. Frederick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



|                           
|---------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2009       
|                           
|/s/    William W. Frederick
|William W. Frederick       
|Chief Financial Officer
#### Yetta Thalheimer, Respondent, v. James Lamont, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed ana new trial ordered m the Monroe County Court, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.