alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Presidential Documents 29395 

Proclamation 8526 of May 20, 2010 

National Maritime Day, 2010 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Even before our Nation declared independence, our forebears recognized 

the importance of merchant ships and seafarers to our economic and national 

security. Since 1775, America’s maritime fleet has risen to the challenges 

before them and worked to meet our country’s needs in times of peace 

and war alike. On National Maritime Day, we recognize the men and women 

of the United States Merchant Marine for their contributions to America’s 

leadership in the global marketplace, and to our security. 

Civilian mariners and their ships have played an important role in equipping 

our military forces at sea in national conflicts. During World War II, they 

executed the largest sealift the world had ever known, and thousands gave 

their lives to help convoys with desperately needed supplies reach our 

troops. Their service to our Nation continues today. Merchant mariners 

support military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as humanitarian 

missions, including the delivery of supplies to Haiti following this year’s 

devastating earthquake. 

The United States Merchant Marine also shepherds the safe passage of 

American goods. They carry our exports to customers around the world 

and support the flow of domestic commerce on our maritime highways. 

They help strengthen our Nation’s economy; bolster job-creating businesses; 

and, along with the transportation industry, employ Americans on ships 

and tugs, and in ports and shipyards. Today, we pay tribute to the United 

States Merchant Marine, and we honor all those whose tireless work is 

laying a foundation for growth, prosperity, and leadership in the 21st century. 

The Congress, by a joint resolution approved May 20, 1933, has designated 

May 22 of each year as ‘‘National Maritime Day,’’ and has authorized and 

requested the President to issue annually a proclamation calling for its 

appropriate observance. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim May 22, 2010, as National Maritime Day. 

I call upon the people of the United States to mark this observance with 

appropriate activities, and I encourage all ships sailing under the American 

flag to dress ship on that day. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCS
29396 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day 

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12756 

Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W0–P 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
Notice of Articles



 EXHIBIT 4.1 
  

							
	

	 	 Ministry
 of Finance
	 	 Mailing Address:
 PO BOX 9431 Stn Prov
Govt.
 Victoria BC V8W 9V3
	 	 Location:
 2nd Floor - 940 Blanshard St.
 Victoria BC

		 	BC Registry Services	 	www.corporateonline.gov.bc.ca	 	250 356-8626

  
  

					
		 		 	 CERTIFIED COPY
 Of a Document filed with the Province of
 British Columbia Registrar of Companies

		 	 Notice of Articles
  
 BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT
	 	 


 RON TOWNSHEND
 June 4, 2009


 

 
 NOTICE OF ARTICLES 
  

			
	 Name of Company:
  
 ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	

  
  
  

			
	REGISTERED OFFICE INFORMATION	 	
		
	 Mailing Address:
 1200 WATERFRONT
CENTRE
 200 BURRARD STREET
 P.O. BOX 48600
 VANCOUVER BC V7X 1T2
 CANADA
	 	 Delivery Address:
 1200 WATERFRONT
CENTRE
 200 BURRARD STREET
 VANCOUVER BC V6C 3L6
 CANADA


  
  
  

			
	RECORDS OFFICE INFORMATION	 	
		
	 Mailing Address:
 1200 WATERFRONT
CENTRE
 200 BURRARD STREET
 P.O. BOX 48600
 VANCOUVER BC V7X 1T2
 CANADA
	 	 Delivery Address:
 1200 WATERFRONT
CENTRE
 200 BURRARD STREET
 VANCOUVER BC V6C 3L6
 CANADA


  
  
  

 BC0374228 Page: 1 of 3 









			
	DIRECTOR INFORMATION	 	
		
	 Last Name, First Name, Middle Name:
 HUNTER,
WILLIAM L.
	 	
		
	 Mailing Address:
 1618 STATION STREET

VANCOUVER BC V6A 1B6
 CANADA
	 	 Delivery Address:
 1618 STATION STREET

VANCOUVER BC V6A 1B6
 CANADA


  
  
  

			
	 Last Name, First Name, Middle Name:
 BROWN, EDWARD
MONTGOMERY
	 	
		
	 Mailing Address:
 3365 CLAY STREET
 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94118
 UNITED STATES
	 	 Delivery Address:
 3365 CLAY STREET
 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94118
 UNITED STATES


  
  
  

			
	 Last Name, First Name, Middle Name:
 McKinnell,
Henry Alexander
	 	
		
	 Mailing Address:
 2720 MARSH HAWK
 JACKSON WY 83001
 UNITED STATES
	 	 Delivery Address:
 2720 MARSH HAWK
 JACKSON WY 83001
 UNITED STATES


  
  
  

			
	 Last Name, First Name, Middle Name:
 WILLMS,
ARTHUR H.
	 	
		
	 Mailing Address:
 1002 - 1328 MARINASIDE CRESCENT

 VANCOUVER BC V6Z 3B3
 CANADA
	 	 Delivery Address:
 1002 - 1328 MARINASIDE CRESCENT

 VANCOUVER BC V6Z 3B3
 CANADA


  
  
  

			
	 Last Name, First Name, Middle Name:
 Brege, Laura
A.
	 	
		
	 Mailing Address:
 2100 POWELL STREET
 12TH FLOOR
 EMERYVILLE CA 94608
 UNITED STATES
	 	 Delivery Address:
 2100 POWELL STREET

12TH FLOOR
 EMERYVILLE CA 94608
 UNITED STATES


  
  
  

			
	 Last Name, First Name, Middle Name:
 HOWARD, DAVID
T.
	 	
		
	 Mailing Address:
 3-215 EAST KEITH ROAD

NORTH VANCOUVER BC V7L 1V4
 CANADA
	 	 Delivery Address:
 3-215 EAST KEITH
ROAD
 NORTH VANCOUVER BC V7L 1V4
 CANADA


  

 BC0374228 Page: 2 of 3 








 AUTHORIZED SHARE STRUCTURE 
  
  

					
	1. 200,000,000	 	COMMON Shares	 	Without Par Value
			
		 		 	 With Special Rights or
 Restrictions
attached


  
  
  

					
	2. 50,000,000	 	CLASS I PREFERENCE Shares	 	Without Par Value
			
		 		 	 With Special Rights or
 Restrictions
attached


  

 BC0374228 Page: 3 of 3
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 
**- 1129** 

ANTHONY W. PERRY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:14

- cv
- 02862

- TDC )

Submitted : September 29 , 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Anthony W. Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Anthony W. Perry appeals the district court ’s order
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Perry v. United States , No. 8:14

- cv
02862

- TDC (D. Md. June 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument

becaus e the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 261 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 16:28:11 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 261 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 16:28:11 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 261 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 16:28:11 Page 3 of 3
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JOSEPH MICHAEL D'ANGIOLINI,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 

SERVICES,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2015-5141

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:99-vv-00578-LB, Judge Lawrence J. 

Block.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

BARRY W. KRENGEL, Dolchin, Slotkin & Todd, P.C., 

Philadelphia, PA, argued for petitioner-appellant.

 HEATHER LYNN PEARLMAN, Vaccine/Torts Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also 

represented by GABRIELLE M. FIELDING, VINCENT J.

MATANOSKI, RUPA BHATTACHARYYA, BENJAMIN C. MIZER. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 12, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,805, TA-W-71,805A]


Autosplice, Inc. Including On-Site Leased Workers From Select 
Temporary Services and Payrolling.Com, San Diego, CA; Including an 
Employee in Support of Autosplice, Inc. San Diego, CA, Working Out of 
Farmingdale, NY; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply 
for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on October 28, 2009, applicable to workers of Autosplice, Inc., 
including on-site leased workers from Select Temporary Services and 
Payrolling.com. The notice was published in the Federal Register 
December 11, 2009 (74 FR 65795).
    At the request of a State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of electrical connectors used in medical, 
transportation, automotive, consumer goods, telecommunication and 
industrial applications.
    New information shows that a worker separation has occurred 
involving an employee in support of the San Diego, California location 
of Autosplice, Inc., working out of Farmingdale, New York. Ms. Pamela 
J. Sokol provided sales and marketing functions supporting the San 
Diego, California production facility of the subject firm.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include an employee in support of the San Diego, 
California facility working out of Farmingdale, New York.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in 
production of electrical connectors used in for medical, 
transportation, automotive, consumer goods, telecommunication and 
industrial applications to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-71,805 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Autosplice, Inc., including on-site leased 
workers from Select Temporary Services and Payrolling.com, and 
including an employee in support of Autosplice, Inc., San Diego, 
California working off site in Farmingdale, New York (TA-W-71,805A), 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after July 23, 2008 through October 28, 2011, and all workers in the 
group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.''

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of May 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-12896 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Cite as State v. Mosley , 2014-Ohio-5013.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NOS. CA2014-04-056 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CA2014-04-057

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 11/10/2014 : JOHN GUS MOSLEY, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 11 CR 27617

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, 500 Justice Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for plaintiff-appellee Michael K. Allen & Associates, Mary K. Martin, 5181 Natorp Blvd., Suite 210, Mason, Ohio 45040, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam

. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, John Gus Mosley, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1)Warren CA2014-04-056 CA2014-04-057 indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
ALBERT L. BUCKHALTER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 0424

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed July 1 4 , 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson, III , Judge

.

Albert L. Buckhalter, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court's summary denial of his motion for

postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)

.

Because the appellant’s direct appeal of his judgment and sentence was pending at

the time , the trial court was without jurisdiction to rule on the appellant’ s2 postconviction motion. See Day v. State

, 770 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)

(holding that effective January 13, 2000, a party may n ot file a rule 3.800(a)

motion during the pendency of a direct appeal); Bunkley v. State

, 800 So. 2d 663

(Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that a trial court is without jurisdiction to rule on a

motion for postconviction relief during the pendency of a direct ap peal).

Accordingly, we quash the order denying the appellant’s postconviction

motion.

ORDER QUASHED.

THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6765

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRIAN KEITH MILLS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-91-88-G, CA-97-667-2)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Bullock Currin, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.

David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Mills, No. CR-91-88-G, CA-97-667-2 (M.D.N.C. May

11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 11
 THE TURNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES			
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE			
"(in thousands, except per share amounts)"			
			
                                                     	(unaudited)		
                                                  	Nine Months Ended		
                                                     September 30,
                                                 	1996	          	1995
			
PRIMARY			
Weighted average common shares outstanding	       5,237          5,186 
			
Common stock equivalents (assuming the use
 of the proceeds  from their exercise or
 issuance to acquire treasury stock using			
 the average quarterly market price) granted
 under employee stock option and stock
 purchase plans                                      98         		104 
			
Weighted average common and common equivalent
 shares outstanding                               5,335         5,290 
			
Earnings (loss) available to common 
 shareholders less dividends	on preferred stock,
 net of tax                                     ($1,435)       $1,947
			
Primary earnings (loss) per common share        	($0.27)	      	$0.37 
			
FULLY DILUTED			
Weighted average shares outstanding used in 
 the computation of primary	earnings (loss)
 per common share                                5,237          5,186
			
Common stock equivalents (assuming the use
 of the proceeds from their exercise or 
 issuance to acquire treasury stock using the			
 quarter ended market price) granted under
 employee stock option and stock purchase plan	     98 	        	104 
			
Conversion of convertible preferred stock
 to common stock	                                  848         		849 
			
Stock option equivalent shares                     	22           		-
			
Weighted average common and common equivalent
 shares outstanding                             	6,205         6,139
			
Earnings (loss) available for common
 shareholders less	preferred dividend 
 differential, net of tax                      ($1,435)       $1,947 
			
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per common
 share	                                         ($0.23)	      	$0.32
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2672

BETTY DELORIS JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social

Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District

Judge. (CA-98-125-B)

Submitted: May 31, 2000 Decided: June 15, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Bradwell, SHORTIDGE & SHORTIDGE, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. John M. Sacchetti, Regional Chief Counsel, Lori Karimoto,

Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of General Counsel, SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Robert P.

Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, John F. Corcoran, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Betty Deloris Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and entering summary

judgment to the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial

of disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record,

briefs, and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Therefore, we grant the motion to submit the case on the briefs and

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Apfel,

No. CA-98-125-B (W.D. Va. Nov. 2, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.4
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John A. Featherman, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,  certify
   -----------------------
that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending
March 31, 2005 of First Chester County Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



August 19, 2005


/s/ John A. Featherman, III
---------------------------
John A. Featherman, III
Chief Executive Officer