alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 1

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 2

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 3

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 4

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 5

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 6

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 7

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 8

of 9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2656-4 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 16:06:52 Page 9

of 9
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133903 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133903 COA: 266080 Allegan CC: 05-014142-FC SHAWN MICHAEL ELY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
H. R. 4919 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 715 Shawan 

Falls Drive in Dublin, Ohio, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Wesley G. Davids and Captain 

Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL WESLEY G. DAVIDS AND CAPTAIN NICHOLAS J. ROZANSKI MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 715 Shawan Falls Drive in Dublin, Ohio, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Wesley G. Davids 

and Captain Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Wesley G. Davids and Captain Nicholas 

J. Rozanski Memorial Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## October is #CybersecurityAwarenessMonth

Courts must also be prepared for cyberattacks on court systems, such as denial of service and ransomware attacks on court case management systems, websites, and other critical information technology infrastructure. SJI supports projects that assist courts in preparing for, and responding to, these attacks, and share lessons-learned to courts across the United States.

**#Cybersecurity** is one of SJI’s Priority Investment Areas. Take a look at some of our cybersecurity projects here: https://www.sji.gov/priority-investment-areas/cybersecurity/

### 

                    - cybersecurity-stock-photo  (2 MB)

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

KV STRUCTURES, INC.

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

KV STRUCTURES, INC. 

P.O. BOX 400

CEDAR RIDGE, CA 95924

ATTN: ROBERT MC COLLUM

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: April 30, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Proof of Claim Amount Debtor Case No.

Claim No. 95 $536,669.01 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 97 $536,669.01 PG&E Corporation 19-30088

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1763 Filed: 04/30/19 Entered: 04/30/19 10:24:09 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1763 Filed: 04/30/19 Entered: 04/30/19 10:24:09 Page 2 of

2
#### WILLIAM L. MATSON, Respondent, *v.*NANCY E. BURT, Appellant.

*United States Circuit Court*— not *inferior court rendm’ing it necessm’y to show its jurisdiction on the face of the record*— *Appeal, without secwrity, from judgment*of, *does not prevent am, action on the judgment being brought in another court.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

The action was brought upon a judgment recovered in the United States Circuit Court for the northern district of New York. The defendant insisted that the Circuit Court was an inferior court, and that the fact showing that it had jurisdiction to render the judgment should be set forth in the complaint, and also that as the action in which the judgment was rendered had been taken to the Supreme Court of the United States, upon a writ of error, that no action could be maintained thereon until the cause had been there decided.

The court at General Term say: “ The judgment set out in the complaint is sufficiently described under the provision of section 161 of the Code.

*471Tbe Circuit Court for the northern district of New York, is not an inferior court in the sense which renders it necessary to show its jurisdiction on the face of the record. *(Ohemung Ganal BcmTc*v. Judson, 8 N. Y., 254.)

The judgment remains valid till reversed, and may be enforced by execution until stayed by security given under the statute. If a judgment can be enforced in such case, without a stay from the Supreme Court of the United States, it can, I should think, be sued over in any court of competent jurisdiction.

We are referred to no authority holding that an appeal or writ of error brought to review a judgment without security, suspends proceedings upon such judgment by suit or in any other mode.

The judgment should be affirmed.”

*BolUn Traoy,*for the appellant.. *W. E. Exighitt,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Smith, J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Taloott, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certification**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | May 9,   2011 | /s/    | Mitchell   T.G. Graye                   |
|--------|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |               |   | Mitchell   T.G. Graye                   |
|   |               |   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| Dated: | May 9,   2011 | /s/    | James   L. McCallen                                 |
|--------|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |               |   | James   L. McCallen                                 |
|   |               |   | Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
Exhibit32.1

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section1350(A) And (B))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a) and (b)), theundersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of MetaldyneCorporation (the "Company") that theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedOctober 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.

|  | /s/ Timothy D. LeulietteTimothy D.Leuliette Chief Executive Officer |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: November 17,2004

----
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

I, Nabeela Ahmad, do declare and state as follows:

1. I am employed at Prime Clerk LLC (“Prime Clerk”), the claims and noticing agent

for the debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On June 19, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime

Clerk caused the following document to be served via First Class Mail on Gann, Andrew John 

[MMLID 4913055], at an address that has been redacted in the interest of privacy:

• Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case [Docket No. 396]

3. On June 19, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime

Clerk caused the following document to be served via First Class Mail on Walker, Alexander

(MMLID: 4975355), 1272 Peninsula Dr, Menlo Park, CA, 94025:

• Order Extending Time to Assume or Reject Unexpired Leases of Nonresidential Real

Property [Docket No. 2227]

4. On June 19, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime

Clerk caused the following document to be served via First Class Mail on Leisa Askew [MMLID 

6010148], at an address that has been redacted in the interest of privacy:

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2681 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/20/19 13:04:59 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2681 Filed: 06/20/19 Entered: 06/20/19 13:04:59 Page 2 of

2
#### John Burlingame v. William H. Mandeville.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted,
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127944 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127944 

 COA: 255138 

Oakland CC: 97-156405-FC 

QUAMAIN LARILATEFAI SPANN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2004 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
NO. 03-15-00301-CR COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE AUSTIN SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

EX PARTE JOSE LOREDO

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW #1 HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 095790-A

First Motion For Extension ofTime in Which to File State's Brief

( Whitney Borgman Asst. Criminal DistrictAttorney 712 S. StagecoachTrail, Suite 2057 San Marcos, Texas 78666 Ph: (512) 878-6544/Fax: (512) 393-2246 State BarNo. 24082224 whitney.borgman@co.hays.tx.us Attorney for the State ofTexas ACCEPTED 03-15-00301-CR 6873222 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/10/2015 3:59:17 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKTO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS: The State files this First Motion for Extension ofTime in Which to File 

### State's Brief, and in support states: 

### 1. The State's current deadline for filing its briefis September 10,2015. 2. This is the State's first Motion for Extension ofTime in which to file its brief. 

### 3. The State respectfully requests an extension of approximately thirty days, until October 10, 2015 in which to file its brief 4. Good cause exists for the State's request for extension oftime in which to file its brief The attorney ofrecord is currently the prosecutor in a CPSjury trial. 

### 5. This circumstance has significantly delayed the completion of this brief 

### 6. This extension is not being sought to cause undue delay, but to seek justice. 

### 7. For the foregoing reasons, the State respectfully requests that the Court 

### grant an approximate thirty day extension for filing Appellee's Brief, until October 10, 2015.

### Respectfully submitted,

Whitney Borg

Asst. Criminal District Attorney 

### Hays County Government Center 712 South Stagecoach Trail, Ste. 2057 San Marcos, Texas, 78666 512-878-6544 

### whitney.borgman@co.hays.tx.us State Bar No. 24082224 

### Attorney for the State ofTexas



### The foregoing Appellant Motion for Extension of Time in Which to 

### File Appellant's Briefwas subscribed and sworn to before me by Whitney Borgman on this the 10th ofSeptember, 2015.

RHONDAWIEDERSTIIN n MYCOMMISSION EXPIRES Septeirf)er9,2018 

### Whitney Bor \) 

# 2iOuJkAJiU Notary Public in and tor the State ofTexasCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I certify that on September 10, 2015, I served the above motion by email to David A. Mendoza at mendozaone@yahoo.com, in accordance with the Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure.


### Whitney Bofgman
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 40169 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Catherine Pauline Thompson,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:11

- CR

- 705

- 1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Defendant

- Appellant Catherine Pauline Thompson , federal prisoner
# 89703

- 279, challenges the district court’s denial of her motion for a compassionate release reduction of her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). S he contends on appeal that the district court abused its

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 28, 2021
Ly le W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40169 Document: 00516072551 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2021No. 21

- 40169

2 discretion in denying her motion , claiming that the court appl ied an incomplete or unreasonable view of the facts and record.
We review a district court’s decision to deny a prisoner’s compassionate release mot ion for abuse of discretion. See United States v.
Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). A district court may modify a defendant’s term of imprisonment, after considering the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, if the court concludes that “extra ordinary and compelling
reasons warrant such a reduction.” § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).
Here, the district court denied Thompson’s motion based on a finding that the § 3553(a) factors necessitated her continued imprisonment

. See
Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 693

– 94

. It cl early articulated the reasons it so concluded, identifying the relevant factors as well as the facts underlying its reasoning

. See id. at 693. Thompson has not identified any way in which the district court’s assessment of the record was clearly erroneous, and her disagreement with its weighing of the sentencing factors is not sufficient to
demonstrate an abuse of discretion. See id. at 693

– 94.

The district court’s order is AFFIRMED

. Case: 21-40169 Document: 00516072551 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/28/2021
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Titanium Metals  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Quarterly
Report"),  I, JoAnne A. Nadalin,  Vice President and Corporate  Controller,  and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
          operations of the Company




February 28, 2003


/s/ JoAnne A. Nadalin
JoAnne A. Nadalin
Vice President and Corporate Controller
Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 
552b(e)(3)), the Farm Credit Administration gave notice on May 24, 2010 
(75 FR 28806) of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration 
Board (Board) scheduled for June 10, 2010. This notice is to amend the 
agenda by adding an item to the open session of that meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts of this meeting 
will be closed to the public. The agenda for June 10, 2010, is amended 
by adding an item to the open session to read as follows:

Open Session

C. Reports

    <bullet> Young, Beginning, and Small Farmer Mission Performance--
2009 Results.

    Dated: May 26, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-13102 Filed 5-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Haley, Millette and Senior Judge Coleman 

BLANCHE MAY ROBERTS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 1006-08-2 PER CURIAM 

 AUGUST 12, 2008 

PARAMOUNT KING’S DOMINION/VIACOM, INC. 

 AND TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY 

 COMPANY OF AMERICA 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Blanche May Roberts, pro se, on brief). 

 (Patsy L. Mundy; Law Office of Mark J. Beachy, on brief), for 

appellees. 

 Blanche May Roberts appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission 

finding she failed to prove that she sustained (1) injuries to her feet, ankles, or neck/shoulders as 

a result of her compensable March 16, 2005 injury by accident; and (2) temporary partial 

disability from April 2006 through October 2006 causally related compensable injuries sustained 

in that accident.1

 We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its 

final opinion. See Roberts v. Paramount King’s Dominion/Viacom, Inc., VWC File No. 

230-72-38 (Mar. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 The commission also found, “[a]ssuming arguendo that the claimant was partially 

disabled as a result of compensable injuries, she made no effort to market her residual work 

capacity.” 
- 2 - 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.