alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed September 14 , 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00145

- CV

____________ REGIONAL SPECIALTY CLINIC, P.A. , Appellant
V. S.A RANDLE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. AND SARNIE A. RANDLE, JR. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 157 t h District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 81941



### ORDER

This court issued its opinion and judgment in this case on May 4, 2021

. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 49.1 provides for the filing of a motion for rehearing within fifteen days after a court of appeals’ judgment or order is rendered. Tex. R. App. Proc. 49.1. Appellant filed a m otion for rehearing on June 29, 2021, which was denied on August 3, 2 031. Appellant filed a motion for en banc reconsideration on August 19, 2021 , tit led motion for hearing, and fi led a2

pro perly titled motion for en banc re consideration on August 2 3, 2021. Bo t h motions were filed more than 15 day s after this court ruled on appellant ’ s motion for rehearing.
“A court of appeals may extend the time for filing a motion for rehearing or en banc reconsideration if a party files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) no later than 15 days after the last date for filing the motion.” Tex. R. App. P. 49.8. A party seeking an extension of time in the court of appe als is required to file a motion specifically stating the facts that reasonably explain the need for an extension. Rios v. Calhoon , 889 S.W.2d 257, 259 (Tex. 1994) ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C) ( requiring motion to extend time to include facts re lied on to reasonably explain the need for an extension). No motion for extension of time was
filed in this case

. The Texas Supreme Court has consistently treated minor procedural mis takes with leniency to preserv e appellate rights. See Verburgt v. Dorne r , 959 S.W.2d 615, 616

- 17 (Tex. 1997) (implying extension of time when a party perfects an appeal in good faith within the 15

- day period for filing an extension)

. Thus, a motion for extension of time can be implied when a motion for rehear ing is filed with in the 15

- day period for filing a motion for extension of time if the appellant thereafter files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b)(1) that contain s a reasonable explanation to support the late filing

. See Houser v. McElveen, 243 S.W.3d 646, 647 (Tex. 20 08 ) ; see also Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Ctr

. Assoc., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 807 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.) (implying extension but requiring reasonable explanation)

.3

Accordingly, unless appellant files with the clerk of this court a m otion that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b)(1) and provides a reasonable explanation for the la te filing of the party’s motion for en banc
reconsideration within sev en days of the date of this order, the court will deny the motion fo r rehearing as untimely.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell and Spain

.
exhibit10-1.htm


BROADVISION

Framework for FY 2009

Employee Profit-Sharing Plan (EPSP)

 


	
Plan objective:
	
The program is designed to retain our talented employees by sharing company profitability once a certain threshold has been met and maintained on a sustainable basis.  It is also intended to underscore the commitment to turning around our company by aligning and rewarding behavior that leads to achieving a profitable business model
and other company objectives.

	  	  
	
Plan duration:
	
January 1 ~ December 31 2009

	  	  
	
Plan details:
	
1. EPSP award pool allocation methodology approved by BOD Compensation Committee at the beginning of the year and implemented by management on a quarterly basis.

2. Eligible persons are active, full-time or more than seventy-five percent (>75%) part-time employees who maintain a satisfactory standing during the entirety of each quarter and who remain an employee at the time of each quarterly
payout.  The company reserves the right to make certain exclusions or exceptions regarding eligibility on a case-by-case basis.

3. Part-time or on-leave employees are eligible for a pro-rated amount based on the number of actual regular hours worked.

4. Payouts are targeted at a certain percentage of each individual's base salary, set and/or adjusted with management discretion.

5. Payment is made on the first regularly scheduled pay date after the announcement of quarterly earnings, or on such other date as deemed appropriate by management.

6. All amounts earned but not paid under the plan (reductions from any "merit factor", resignations with positive profit-sharing accruals, etc) are eliminated, going back into company earnings.

7. Award pool allocation will be determined as a percentage of profits; after close of each quarter, management, in its sole discretion, will set the percentage for the corresponding quarter.

8. Payouts are subject to adjustment by management, and the CEO has final determination of all profitability payments.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GERRY DEVON WEST
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 400

[ March 2, 2023 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Deborah Carpenter

- Toye , Judge; L.T. Case No. 19

- 00 6742

- MM10A

.

Gordon Weekes, Public Defender , and Lisa S. Lawlor, Chief Assistant Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale , for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas,

Senior A ssistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, C ONNER and A RTAU
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130924 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130924 COA: 268117 Wayne CC: 05-003869-01 RAYMOND DARRELL MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

p0920 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya (Panel 
B), Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) GH10-003, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-3 p.m., June 24, 2010 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya (Panel 
B),'' FOA GH10-003.
    Contact Person for More Information: Sheree Marshall Williams, 
PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop D73, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-7742.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: May 25, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-13169 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
2009 NMD Plan Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10(iii)(A)(12) 
 THE 2009 NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS’ STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT 
 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby grants an Option to purchase shares of the
Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) to the Participant named below. The terms and conditions of the Option are set forth in this Award Agreement (the “Agreement”), and in The 2009 Non-Management Directors’ Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 
  

							
	 Date of Option Grant        
  
	  	Participant’s Name	  	 	  	<First Name Last Name>
	 Expiration Date
  
	  	4:30 p.m. Eastern Time on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant	  	 Exercise Price Per Share

	 Number of Shares Underlying Option
  
	  	  
 <Number>
	  	 	  	 
	Vesting	  	Except as set forth in Section 9.3 of the Plan, the Option will vest in full on the third anniversary from the date of grant. Except as set
forth in Section 6.4, the vested Options may be exercised in accordance with Section 6.3 of the Plan.

 The terms of the Plan are incorporated herein by reference. All capitalized terms that are not
defined in this Agreement have the meanings set forth in the Plan. In case of any conflict between this Agreement and the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall control. Please review the rest of this Agreement and the Plan document, and execute the
Agreement where indicated below. 
 THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES,
INC. 
 

 
 Fabrizio Alcobe-Fierro 
 Vice President, Global Compensation 
 I have read this Agreement and the Plan, and I understand and agree to their terms and conditions.

  

	
	
	  
	 Participant’s Signature,
 to be provided
electronically










 THE 2009 NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS’
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 NONSTATUTORY STOCK
OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT 
 The following terms and conditions supplement the terms of the
Plan: 
  

			
	Beneficiary	  	As set forth in the Plan, rights under this Option may be passed by will or the laws of descent or distribution. The
person(s) to whom the Option is so passed is the Participant’s “Beneficiary.”
	Interpretation and Construction	  	This Agreement and the Plan shall be construed and interpreted by the Committee, in its sole discretion. Any interpretation or other determination by the Committee (including, but not limited
to, correction of any defect or omission and reconciliation of any inconsistency in this Agreement or the Plan) shall be binding and conclusive.
	Entire Understanding	  	This Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire understanding between you and the Company and its Affiliates regarding
the Option. Any prior agreements, commitments, or negotiations concerning the Option are superseded.

  

 -2-
Order filed July 6, 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 20
- 00586
- CR

____________ EX PARTE WILLIAM SOLOMON LEWIS , Appellant
On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1678565



### O R D E R

Wil liam Solomon Lewis brings this appeal from the trial court’s order on his application for writ of h abeas co rpus seeking a reduction in bail

. The State has informed this court appellant w as found guilty on April 12, 2021, and on July 1, 2021 , was s entenced to prison for eight years. Acco rdingly, this appeal is moot. See Ex parte Tucker , 3 S.W.3d 576, 576 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999 ) (“The appellant having been tried during the pendency of this appeal, the question of his pre

- trial bon d is moot.”) ; Bennet v. State , 818 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex. App.

– Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.) ( same )

.The Harris County Distr ict Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s

r ecord on or before July 16, 2021 , containing the judgment of conviction in tr ial
court cause n umber 1678565 on or before July 21, 2021

. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CUR IAM

Pan el Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Hassan

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6197

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BORENZO CORTEZ PATRICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. Richard E. Myers II, Chief District Judge. (7:17-cr-00028-M-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 27, 2023

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Borenzo Cortez Patrick, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6197 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Borenzo Cortez Patrick appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We review a district court’s 

denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 

992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the 

record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently explained 

the reasons for its denial. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) 

(discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release motion). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Patrick, No. 7:17-cr00028-M-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 15, 2022 & entered Nov. 16, 2022). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6197 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Professional Fees $ 5,517,962.00

Less 100% Travel Fees* (882,895.00)

Total Current Fees 4,635,067.00

Expenses 333,114.84 

Total Invoice $ 4,968,181.84

*AP Services, LLC ("APS") has engaged in discussions with the United States Trustee with regard to a 

reasonable amount of compensation for non-working travel. Pending the resolution of such discussions, APS 

has not included any non-working travel charges in this Monthly Staffing and Compensation Report. APS 

is, therefore, submitting this Monthly Staffing and Compensation Report at this time, without prejudice to 

seeking compensation for such non-working travel in a subsequent filing.

Exhibit A

AP SERVICES, LLC

Summary of Compensation and Expenses – Pacific Gas and Electric Company, et al.

For the Period May 1, 2019 through May 31, 2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2873-1 Filed: 07/05/19 Entered: 07/05/19 12:04:22 Page 1

of 1
#### James L. Angle and another, as Executors, etc., Appellants, v. Jerome B. Manning, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Haight, J., not voting.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, J. E.
      Corrigan, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
      The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      J.E.
      Corrigan, Jr.


________________________


J.
      E.
      Corrigan, Jr.


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      9,
      2007
#### Samuel Goldberg, Appellant, v. Pincus Malzman and Others, Respondents.

Motions denied, without costs.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12170 and #12171]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION: 

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1912-DR), dated 05/11/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         05/01/2010 and continuing.                    

*Effective Date:*                         05/24/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/12/2010.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         02/11/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, dated 05/11/2010, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Anderson, Boyd, Breckinridge, Butler, Clay, Clinton, Elliott, Estill, Fleming, Green, Greenup, Jackson, Hancock, Henderson, Hopkins, Knott, Larue, Leslie, Magoffin, Mason, Ohio, Owen, Powell, Pulaski, Russell, Taylor, Wayne.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-13189 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
Michael A. Zeher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/     Michael A.
      ZeherMichael
      A. Zeher
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer


February
14, 2011





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6032

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CRAIG A. MURPHY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:96-cr-00066-REP-17)

Submitted: May 19, 2014 Decided: May 22, 2014

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig A. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Heather L. Hart, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Craig Murphy appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for resentencing for lack of jurisdiction. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Murphy, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-17 (E.D. 

Va. Dec. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED