alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30409-30410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD), Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention--Ethics Subcommittee (ES)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
subcommittee:
    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-3:30 p.m., June 17, 2010.
    Place: Teleconference. To participate, please dial (866) 919-3560 
and enter passcode 4168828 for access.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by availability of 
telephone ports. The public is welcome to participate during the public 
comment periods. A public comment period is tentatively scheduled for 3 
p.m.-3:15 p.m.
    Purpose: The ES will provide counsel to the ACD, CDC, regarding a 
broad range of public health ethics questions and issues arising from 
programs, scientists and practitioners.
    Matter to be Discussed: Agenda items will include the following 
topics: Development of a strategy to support state and local health 
departments in their efforts to address public health ethics issues and 
coordination of these efforts with the CDC Office of State, Tribal, 
Local, and Territorial Support; steps for addressing ACD input on the 
ventilator guidance document; development of public health ethics 
cases; future priorities for the ES; and updates on CDC's public health 
ethics activities.
    The agenda is subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Drue Barrett, PhD, Designated 
Federal Officer, ACD, CDC-ES, 1600 Clifton Road, N.E., M/S D-50, 
Atlanta, GA 30333. Telephone: (404) 639-4690. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e7a7c7f6c6c7b6a6a5e7d7a7d30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c383e3d2e2e3928281c3f383f723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.


[[Page 30410]]


    Dated: May 21, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Service Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-13014 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4816-2076-6108 

44553.00001

Dennis F. Dunne (admitted pro hac vice) 

Samuel A. Khalil (admitted pro hac vice) 

MILBANK LLP 

55 Hudson Yards 

New York, New York 10001-2163 

Telephone: (212) 530-5000 

Facsimile: (212) 530-5219 

and 

Gregory A. Bray (SBN 115367) 

Thomas R. Kreller (SBN 161922) 

MILBANK LLP 

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (424) 386-4000 

Facsimile: (213) 629-5063 

Counsel for the Official Committee 

of Unsecured Creditors 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered)

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case. 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 

BETWEEN OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF 

UNSECURED CREDITORS AND AD HOC 

COMMITTEE OF SENIOR UNSECURED 

NOTEHOLDERS EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO MOTION OF THE AD HOC 

COMMITTEE OF SENIOR UNSECURED 

NOTEHOLDERS TO TERMINATE THE 

DEBTORS’ EXCLUSIVE PERIODS 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1121(D)(1) OF 

THE BANKRUPTCY CODE 

[No Hearing Requested] 

Signed and Filed: July 15, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

July 15, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2991 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 17:32:38 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

4816-2076-6108 

The Court having considered the Stipulation Between Official Committee of Unsecured 

Creditors and Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders Extending Time to Respond to 

Motion of the Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders to Terminate the Debtors’ 

Exclusive Periods Pursuant to Section 1121(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Stipulation”), 

entered into by the (i) Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “UCC”) appointed in the 

jointly administered chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) of the above-captioned debtors in 

possession, on the one hand; and (ii) Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders (the 

“Ad Hoc Committee” and together with the UCC, the “Parties”), on the other hand, filed on July 

12, 2019; and, pursuant to such Stipulation and agreement of the Parties, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The time for the UCC to file and serve any response or opposition to the Motion 

(as defined in the Stipulation) is extended through 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on July 18, 2019. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 

Dated: July 12, 2019 

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 

/s/ Ashley Vinson Crawford 

Ashley Vinson Crawford

Ad Hoc Committee of Senior Unsecured Noteholders 

**END OF ORDER** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2991 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 17:32:38 Page 2 of

2
The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge f or the Eastern 1 Dis trict of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable H

. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT



### ___________ No. 95-3582

___________ Adrian B. Tisdale, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the Unite d States * District Court for the Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas. Department of Correction, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 30, 1997 Fil ed: June 4, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Adri anB. Tisdale, an Arkansas state prisoner , appe als the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 1 2254 petition. After carefully reviewing the recor d before us and the parties’ briefs, we conclude th e judgment of the district court was correct an d affirm for the reason s stated in the district court’s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHT H CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5272 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5272

To prohibit certain actions with respect to deferred action for aliens 
   not lawfully present in the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2014

Mrs. Blackburn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit certain actions with respect to deferred action for aliens 
   not lawfully present in the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITIONS RELATING TO DEFERRED ACTION.

    Unless explicitly authorized by law, no agency or instrumentality 
of the Federal Government may issue after July 30, 2014, guidance, 
memorandums, regulations, policies, or other similar instruments the 
effect of which is--
            (1) to modify, in any manner that would expand the number 
        of aliens eligible for deferred action, the Executive 
        memorandum dated June 15, 2012, concerning deferred action for 
        childhood arrivals;
            (2) to newly authorize deferred action for any class of 
        aliens not in lawful immigration status in the United States; 
        or
            (3) to newly authorize any alien to work in the United 
        States if such alien--
                    (A) was not lawfully admitted into the United 
                States in compliance with the immigration laws (as 
                defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and 
                Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17))), except that 
                this subparagraph shall not apply to an alien who is 
                paroled under section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and 
                Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) or permitted to 
                land temporarily as an alien crewman; and
                    (B) is not lawfully present in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dial-Net, Inc., appellant, v. State Board of Equalization and Assessment, appellee. Williams Telecommunications Group, Inc., appellant, v. State Board of Equalization and Assessment, appellee.

471 N.W.2d 752

Filed July 12, 1991.

Nos. 90-867, 90-868.

WilliamE. Peters, of Peters&Chunka, P.C., for appellants.

Don Stenberg, Attorney General, and L. Jay Bartel for appellee.

Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, JJ.

Per Curiam.

These are appeals from the findings and order of the State Board of Equalization and Assessment dated August 15, 1990, denying the appellants’ claims for property tax relief. The appellants in these cases are public service entities within the meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-801.01 (Reissue 1990) and own, maintain, and operate telecommunications systems in Nebraska. The appellants’ property is centrally assessed for property tax purposes pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 77-801 et seq. (Reissue 1990).

The issues raised in these appeals are disposed of by *MAPCO Ammonia Pipeline*v. *State Bd. of Equal., ante*p. 565, 471 N.W.2d 734 (1991). In light of our decision in that case, the causes are remanded to the State Board of Equalization and Assessment for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in *MAPCO Ammonia Pipeline, supra,*and the relief requested by the parties.

Reversed and remanded for

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Shanahan, J.,

concurring in part, and in part dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in my concurrence and dissent filed in *MAPCO Ammonia Pipeline*v. *State Bd. of Equal., ante*p. 565, 471 N.W.2d 734 (1991), I also concur in part and *637dissent in part concerning the majority’s opinion filed in this appeal.
#### William H. Coonan, Respondent, v. Hamburg-American Packet Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the authority of *Pagnillo*v. *Mach Paving & Const. Co.*(142 App. Div. 491).

Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred.
#### Herman B. Ogden, Respondent, v. The Kings County Elevated Railroad Company, Appellant.

—Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.
Order entered February 4

, 2013

In The 

## Qtourtof

## ppeaL fIfth Itritt oftxa9 at aUa No. 05-13-00112-CV IN RE MARTIN GONZALEZ AND MARIO ARROYO, Relators On Appeal from the 301stJudicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-16734 

### ORDER Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus We ORDER ielators to bearthe cost ofthis original proceeding

JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
#### Mary E. Hoefler v. Mary R. Hoefler.

Motions.

Motion denied, without costs.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

UMS GROUP INC.

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

UMS GROUP INC.

MORRIS CORPORATE CENTER 1

300 INTERPACE PKWY, SUITE C380

PARSIPPANY,NJ 07054

ATTN: DIANE C. DURANTE

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: July 1, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F UMS Group Inc. $284,741.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 3377 UMS Group Inc. $295,406.31 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2810 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 14:26:35 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2810 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 14:26:35 Page 2 of

2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri

Appellate case number: 01-20-00169-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-36895

Trial court: 312th District Court of Harris County

Jeff Joyce of Joyce & McFarland LLP has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for 

appellee Mohammad Ali Choudhri and a conditional motion to continue case deadlines 

and reset the upcoming oral argument scheduled in this case for October 19, 2022. Joyce 

requests withdrawal as counsel for Choudhri because he has been unable to reach suitable 

financial arrangements with Choudhri regarding payment for the additional briefing and 

oral argument ordered by this Court on September 1, 2022. Joyce also requests a 

continuance, if needed, to accommodate his withdrawal and the transition to new counsel. 

Although Joyce requested a continuance of the case deadlines, he did not include a 

certificate of conference as required by Rule 10.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5) (requiring motion “in civil cases, except for 

motions for rehearing and en banc reconsideration, contain or be accompanied by a 

certificate stating that the filing party conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, 

with all other parties about the merits of the motion and whether those parties oppose the 

motion”). Accordingly, we requested a response from appellant Hira Azhar, but no 

response was filed. We grant the motion to withdraw, grant the motion to continue case 

deadlines, remove the case from this Court’s oral argument docket and from submission 

on October 19, 2022, and suspend the supplemental briefing deadlines set by the September 

1 order.

Further, we abate the appeal to allow Choudhri to secure new counsel. Choudhri is 

ordered to file a motion to reinstate or a status report advising the Court of the status of 

his search for new counsel no later than October 24, 2022. We reserve the right to reinstate 

the appeal and reset this case for submission, either on the briefs or for oral argument, upon 

the receipt of a status report, without regard to whether Choudhri has at that time been able 

to secure new counsel, or in the event Choudhri fails to file a status report or motion to 
reinstate as ordered. After the case is reinstated on this Court’s active docket, supplemental 

briefing on the issues identified in this Court’s September 1, 2022 order will be due—on 

behalf of both Azhar and Choudhri—within 30 days from the date of reinstatement. After 

receipt of the supplemental briefing, the Court will determine whether and when to reset

this case for submission on the briefs or for oral argument in accordance with the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.1, 39.7, 39.8.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Amparo Guerra

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court*

Date: September 22, 2022

*Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Rivas-Molloy, and Guerra
<PAGE>

                                                      Exhibit 23I




                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. of our
report dated February 13, 1998, included in the 1997 Annual
Report to Shareholders of Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-06015) pertaining to
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-40541) pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plan of 1996
of Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 1998
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sunquest
Information Systems, Inc. incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                     /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 26, 1998
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

               INTERLINK COMPUTER SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE (1)
                     (in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                        Three months
                                                     ended September 30,
                                                    ----------------------
                                                     1996           1995
                                                    ------         ------
                                                         (unaudited)
<S>                                                 <C>             <C>
Primary and fully diluted:
  Weighted average shares:
     Common......................................          4,988     2,444
     Preferred...................................                    1,230
  Common equivalent shares from stock options
     and warrants................................          1,159       475
  Common and common equivalent shares pursuant
     to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83.........             __       680
                                                          ------    ------
 
Shares used in per share calculation.............          6,147     4,829
                                                          ======    ======
 
Net income.......................................         $  439    $  254
                                                          ======    ======
 
Net income per share.............................         $ 0.07    $ 0.05
                                                          ======    ======
</TABLE>

(1)  There is no difference between primary and fully diluted net income per
     share for all periods presented.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Page 18 of 18

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


     IMMEDIATELY                                            TAMMY HUBACEK

                          MET-COIL SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                   ANNOUNCES THIRD QUARTER NET EARNINGS UP 20%

CEDAR RAPIDS, IA - MARCH 31, 1999 - Met-Coil Systems Corporation (METS), a
supplier of advanced sheet metal forming equipment, fabricating equipment and
glass processing technologies for the global market, announces net income for
the third quarter and nine months ended February 28, 1999.

         "Operations are strong and order entry remains solid", reports James
Heitt, President and Chief Operating Officer of Met-Coil. "We have been
successful in improving our performance, maintaining our market leadership and
introducing new products, all of which contribute to long-term shareholder
value".

                THIRD QUARTER RESULTS AND NINE-MONTH PERFORMANCE
         Revenues for the third quarter were $10.3 million compared to $11.0
million one year ago. Met-Coil Systems Corporation reported third quarter income
before income taxes of $523,000, compared to $437,000 last year, which
represents a 20% increase. With income tax credits and preferred stock
accretion, net income applicable to common stock was $824,000 or $.19 diluted
earnings per share. This compares to $277,000, or $.09 diluted earnings per
share in the third quarter of fiscal 1998.

         Year-to-date revenues were $32.3 million compared to $33.9 million for
the prior year period. However, order backlog at February 28, 1999 was $18
million, an improvement of $4 million over backlog one year ago. Last year's
revenues included a surge in sales of the Company's plasma cutting machines
which occurred when a competitor discontinued business. Those revenues have
returned to historic levels this year. Gross margin has improved from 22.4% to
23.8% due to continuing efforts to control material costs.

         Income before income taxes for the nine months ended February 28, 1999
was $1.9 million, up from $1.3 million last year. With income tax credits and
preferred stock accretion, net income applicable to common stock was $2.4
million or $.62 diluted earnings per share compared to $796,000 or $.25 diluted
earnings per share one year ago.

         Interest expense for the nine months fell by $402,000, due to lower
levels of outstanding debt, which we continue to paydown. The Company has
recognized net income tax credits of $810,000 in the first nine months of fiscal
1999. Income tax credits relate to a reduction in the Company's deferred tax
asset valuation allowance.



                                   ### END ###
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWHEQ, INC.
                  CWHEQ HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2006-S10
           HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-S10


     The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                 Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance