alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,053,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               56,995,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,532,000
<INVENTORY>                                 62,008,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           121,267,029
<PP&E>                                      41,002,857
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,912,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             142,328,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,294,310
<BONDS>                                     42,204,082
<COMMON>                                       795,284
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  62,903,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               142,328,678
<SALES>                                    188,131,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           188,131,073
<CGS>                                      125,878,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,876,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,751,942)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               837,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,054,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,236,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,212,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,024,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,024,230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
        

</TABLE>
32(i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Bradford,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Mark D. Bradford
--------------------

Mark D. Bradford
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 6, 2005


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Reorganized Debtors. 

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Liz Santodomingo, do declare and state as follows: 

1. I am employed by Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC (“Kroll”)1, the claims and 

noticing agent for the Reorganized Debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On October 4, 2022, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Kroll 

caused the following document to be served by the method set forth on the Affected Claimants 

Service List attached hereto as Exhibit A: 

 Order and Notice of Opportunity to Object to Motions to File Claim After Claims Bar Date by 

Pro Se Claimants through September 30, 2022 [Docket No. 13038] 

3. I have reviewed the Notices of Electronic Filing (NEF) for the above-listed document, 

and I understand that parties listed in each NEF as having received notice through electronic mail were 

electronically served with that document through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system. 

4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that the 

foregoing is true and correct and that if called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify 

thereto. 

1

 Effective March 29, 2022, Prime Clerk LLC changed its name to Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13061 Filed: 10/11/22 Entered: 10/11/22 19:24:20 Page 1

of 4
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 SRF 64496 

Executed this 10th day of October 2022, at New York, NY. 

/s/ Liz Santodomingo

Liz Santodomingo

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13061 Filed: 10/11/22 Entered: 10/11/22 19:24:20 Page 2

of 4
Exhibit A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13061 Filed: 10/11/22 Entered: 10/11/22 19:24:20 Page 3

of 4
Exhibit A

Affected Claimants Service List

Served as set forth below

NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP EMAIL METHOD OF SERVICE

Dean Meyerson Rowan Artemoff-Meyerson Win9393@mac.com Email

Marie Mitchell marietnett04@yahoo.com Email

Melissa Lynn Avilla 643 Russell Ave Apt 5 Santa Rosa CA 95403 First Class Mail

Odin O Mena Borja et al 2139 Stony Point Rd E23 Santa Rosa CA 95407 First Class Mail

Orlando Kai O'Shea orlandokaioshea@gmail.com Email

Sarah Lynch 2964 SW Redmond Hill Road McMinnville OR 97128 First Class Mail

Shane Steven Ronayne 712 McConnell Ave Santa Rosa CA 95404 First Class Mail

Stephen Regis Minaidis 643 Russell Ave Apt 5 Santa Rosa CA 95403 First Class Mail

Theodore L. Bake 280 Rose Lane Paradise CA 95969 First Class Mail

In re: PG&E Corporation, et al.

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13061 Filed: 10/11/22 Entered: 10/11/22 19:24:20 Page 4

of 4
Order entered December 4, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01642-CV

IN RE REGINALD NOBLE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F00-50025-K

ORDER

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

habeas corpus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 1of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 2of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 3of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 4of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 5of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 6of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 7of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 8of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 9of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 10of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 11of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 12of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 13of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 14of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 15of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2880-3    Filed: 07/05/19    Entered: 07/05/19 18:11:27    Page 16of 16
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re )

) Case No. 

) 

) Chapter

Debtor(s). )

____________________________________)

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

, whose business address and telephone number is

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of

having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of

California on a pro hac vice basis, representing

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application

will constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. 

Dated: ____________________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Signed and Filed: February 8, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

PG&E CORPORATION,

19-30088 (DM) 11 Kevin M. Coles

2300 SW First Avenue, Suite 200 (530) 221-0669 

Portland, OR 97201-5047

 The State of Oregon Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Honorable Dennis Montali

Entered on Docket 

February 08, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 383 Filed: 02/08/19 Entered: 02/08/19 14:03:14 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, James
R. McLemore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





/s/ James
R. McLemore


________________________


James R.
McLemore


Chief
Financial Officer
McDonald has also filed a “Motion for Temporary Relief” requesting that this Court stay 1

“any underlying proceedings” in the district court. We overrule that motion.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00686-CV

In re Derrick W. McDonald

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

McDonald has filed an “Original Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” We do not

have jurisdiction to consider McDonald’s petition. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05;

Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet.ref’d)(“Under [article 11.05],

the Court of Criminal Appeals, the District Courts, and the County Courts have the power to issue

a writ of habeas corpus, but the courts of appeals are not designated as having jurisdiction to

entertain or issue writs of habeas corpus.”). To the extent McDonald may be challenging the

trial court’s refusal to issue a writ of a habeas corpus, McDonald presents nothing for review. See

Ex parte Miller, 931 S.W.2d 724, 725-26 (Tex. App.—Austin 1996, no pet.). The petition is

dismissed for want of jurisdiction.1
2

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Filed: December 17, 2008
*Exhibit 31(a)*
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**
I, Michael P. DiMino, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LESCO, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: August 4, 2004      /s/ Michael P. DiMino   Michael P. DiMino President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50100 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERT JOHN MUZNY Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-20-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Robert John Muzny has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Muzny has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Muzny’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Muzny’s United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50100

2 response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave towithdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. Muzny’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION and 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Chapter 11

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice.

Olympus Peak Master Fund LP Owl Creek Investments I, LLC

Name of Transferee Name of Transferor

Phone: 212-373-1189

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Phone: 646-825-7623

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Name and Address where notices and 

payments to transferee should be sent: 

Olympus Peak Master Fund LP

745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1604

New York, New York 10151

Attention: Leah Silverman

Claim No: 2709 (amends Claim No. 1250)

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company (19-30089)

Date Filed: April 23, 2019

Total Amount of Claim: $1,282,917.06

Transferred Amount of Claim: $1,282,917.06

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By: /s/ Leah Silverman Date: July 15, 2019

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 

U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2970 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 08:19:01 Page 1 of

2
11

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2970 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 08:19:01 Page 2 of

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIAN WANG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting

Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-73302 

Agency No. A206-345-023 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 27, 2018**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Jian Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board 

of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s 

decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief 

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 3 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-73302 

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, 

applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the 

REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We 

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies between Wang’s testimony and documentary evidence as 

to the date his father died and the number of times he was interrogated. See id. at 

1048 (adverse credibility determination reasonable under “the totality of 

circumstances”). Wang’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See 

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In his opening brief, Wang does 

not challenge the agency’s determination that in the absence of credible testimony, 

his documentary evidence did not establish eligibility for asylum. Thus, in the 

absence of credible testimony, in this case, Wang’s asylum and withholding of 

removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2013).

In his opening brief, Wang fails to challenge the agency’s denial of his CAT 

claim. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues 

not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Reorganized Debtors. 

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Liz Santodomingo, do declare and state as follows: 

1. I am employed by Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC (“Kroll”)1, the claims and 

noticing agent for the Reorganized Debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On September 6, 2022, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Kroll 

caused the following document to be served via First Class Mail on the following Address ID: 

4731390; 10188046 on William B. Abrams at addresses redacted in the interest of privacy: 

 Order on Motion for Reconsideration [Docket No. 12929] 

3. I have reviewed the Notices of Electronic Filing (NEF) for the above-listed documents, 

and I understand that parties listed in each NEF as having received notice through electronic mail were 

electronically served with that document through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system. 

4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that 

the foregoing is true and correct and that if called upon as a witness, I could and would competently 

testify thereto. 

1

 Effective March 29, 2022, Prime Clerk LLC changed its name to Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12945 Filed: 09/12/22 Entered: 09/12/22 08:59:37 Page 1

of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 SRF 63875 

Executed this 9th day of September 2022, at New York, NY. 

/s/ Liz Santodomingo

Liz Santodomingo

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12945 Filed: 09/12/22 Entered: 09/12/22 08:59:37 Page 2

of 2
|    |                                                                                                                 |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |
|                                                     |
| /s/ MEG A. GENTLE                                        |
| Meg A. Gentle                                            |
| Chief Financial Officer of                               |
| Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of |
| Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.                           |