alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: admin Date Created: 10/14/2022

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 3

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

aty Lawrence A. Jacobson laj@cohenandjacobson.com

aty Thomas B. Rupp trupp@kbkllp.com

TOTAL: 2

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Kroll Restructuring Administration, LLC):):

STEVEN A. LAMB, ESQ. Rovens Lamb LLP 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 370 Torrance, CA 90505

TOTAL: 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13063-3 Filed: 10/12/22 Entered: 10/12/22 13:14:54 Page 1

of 1
Project Category and Billing Category Hours

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

For the Period January 29, 2019 through February 28, 2019

Summary by Project Category and Billing Category

Total 

Compensation

Exhibit A

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Fixed Fee Services

Claims Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-B

Claims Coding 38.90 $6,833.00

Subtotal - Claims Services 38.90 $6,833.00

North Bay & Camp Fire Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-C; 01-D

North Bay & Camp Fire Services 4,736.60 $1,408,250.00

Subtotal - North Bay & Camp Fire Services 4,736.60 $1,408,250.00

IT Implementation Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-G

IT Implementation Services 895.00 $200,000.00

Subtotal - IT Implementation Services 895.00 $200,000.00

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Fixed Fee Services 5,670.50 $1,615,083.00

Hourly Services

E-Discovery Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-K

Project Management 42.80 $16,530.70

Forensic Collections 273.60 $63,494.20

Subtotal - E-Discovery Services 316.40 $80,024.90

Strategic Analysis Services Retention Exhibit #: 03

Project Management Office 556.20 $282,314.00

Human Resources Services 93.30 $54,013.20

Accounting & Reporting Services 1,753.40 $938,446.30

Tax Services 44.10 $26,070.90

Operations Model Services 652.00 $254,935.00

Travel Time - Nonworking (@ 50%) 26.00 $13,180.40

Subtotal - Strategic Analysis Services 3,125.00 $1,568,959.80

Bankruptcy Accounting Advisory Services Retention Exhibit #: 04

Accounting Services 71.60 $58,557.10

Subtotal - Bankruptcy Accounting Advisory Services 71.60 $58,557.10

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Hourly Services 3,513.00 $1,707,541.80

Case Administration

Bankruptcy Requirements and Other Court Obligations Retention Exhibit #: Case

Employment Applications and Other Court Filings 84.60 $46,876.50

Friday, June 28, 2019

Page 1 of 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2802-1 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 13:40:27 Page 1

of 2
Project Category and Billing Category Hours

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

For the Period January 29, 2019 through February 28, 2019

Summary by Project Category and Billing Category

Total 

Compensation

Exhibit A

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Relationship Check and Disinterestedness 24.90 $6,441.00

Monthly, Interim and Final Fee Applications 10.00 $5,500.00

Subtotal - Bankruptcy Requirements and Other Court Obligations 119.50 $58,817.50

Subtotal - Hours and Compensation - Case Administration 119.50 $58,817.50

Total - Hours and Compensation Sought for Reimbursement 9,303.00 $3,381,442.30

Friday, June 28, 2019

Page 2 of 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2802-1 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 13:40:27 Page 2

of 2
[663 NE2d 909, 640 NYS2d 868]

#### Damion Rodriguez, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Saverina Galvan, et al., Respondents, v Oak Point Management, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Argued January 10, 1996;

decided February 8, 1996

*932APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jonathan R. Walsh,*Elmsford, and *William K. Capshaw*for appellant.

*Leonard W. Krouner,*Albany, and *Mullen Morris & Lutzky,*New York City *(Joseph T. Mullen*of counsel), for respondents.

*Sullivan & Liapakis, P. C.,*New York City *(John M. Tomsky*of counsel), for New York State Trial Lawyers’ Association, *amicus curiae.*

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, defendant Oak Point Management’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it granted and the certified question answered in the negative.

Under the circumstances of this case, defendant had no duty to secure the front door of the residential apartment building it owned and operated in order to protect passersby from the threat of criminal actions by individuals engaging in drug-related activity in or around the building *(see, Muniz v Flohern, Inc.,*77 NY2d 869; *Waters v New York City Hous. Auth.,*69 NY2d 225). Although the infant plaintiff happened to be visiting one of the building’s tenants, his position was no different from that of any other passerby at the time he was shot on the street some 191 feet from the front of the building. At that point, his relationship to a building tenant was a mere fortuity having nothing to do with the circumstances surrounding the shooting. Accordingly, defendant Oak Point Management should have been granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.

*933Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.
EX-10.71a







Exhibit No. 10.71a




			
	 	 	 
	
	 	300 DIXIE TRAIL

GOLDSBORO, NC 27530

919-580-2000






February 1, 2009          




AMENDMENT
TO SUPPLY AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 1ST 2007



This amends the term of the Supply Agreement as follows:



It is agreed that AP Exhaust Products, Inc., will be the exclusive supplier of exhaust
products to Monro Service Corporation for a period of 72 months commencing February 1, 2007.
Monro will be free of any default requirement contained in the Supply Agreement after January
31, 2013. If the performance of AP Exhaust Products, Inc. as the exclusive exhaust supplier
to Monro Service Corporation, declines so much as to force Monro to change suppliers for this
program, Monro would be released in full from the default provisions of the Supply Agreement.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	MONRO SERVICE CORPORATION	 	 	 	AP EXHAUST PRODUCTS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ John Van Heel
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Vange Proimos	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Print Name:

	 	John Van Heel
	 	 	 	Print Name:
	 	Vange Proimos	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	President
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	President	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Witness:

	 	/s/ David M. Baier
	 	 	 	Witness:
	 	Alicia Hauck
#### George Fingerhuth v. Benjamin Lachmann.

*Exemptions—Partnership Property—Insolvency.*

A member of an insolvent firm is not entitled to the exemption provided for by Sec. 13, Chap. 52, R. S., out of partnership assets.

[Opinion filed December 11, 1890.]

Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard Prendergast, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. D. P. *&*T. A. Hendricks, for appellant.

Mr. N. M. Plotke, for appellee.

Gary, J.

The appellant and one Heselbarth, doing business as Heselbarth & Fingerhuth, made an assignment for the benefit of their creditors, under which their assets were being administered upon in the County Court. The appellant having a wife and children, with whom he resided, filed a petition that the court would allow him from the partnership property his exemption to the amount allowed to the head of a family under the statute in relation to exemptions. His petition stated that his partner was also entitled to exemptions. On demurrer the court dismissed his petition, and the only question in the case is whether the statutory exemptions can be taken from partnership property. That is a new question in *490this State, and elsewhere the authorities are conflicting. Down to 1878 they are collected in Thompson on Homestead and Exemptions, of that date.

It is unnecessary to review and weigh those authorities here, as the same reasons for which the Supreme Court, in Trowbridge v. Cross, 117 Ill. 109, denied a homestead to one partner, in real property of a firm, apply with equal force to exclude exemptions from the personal property of a firm.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO RULE 2016 OF THE 

LOCAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE FOR THE 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

I, Eugene V. Armstrong, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 

I. I am a Principal of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), a professional services firm. 

II. By Order dated June 11, 2019, KPMG was retained to provide information 

technology, risk, and legal consulting services to the above captioned debtors and debtors in 

possession (the “Debtors”). 

III. I submit this Declaration in conjunction with KPMG’s First Interim 

Application, dated July 15, 2019 (the “Application”) for compensation for services rendered and 

allowance of expenses for the period of January 29, 2019 through May 31, 2019. 

IV. I am very familiar with the services rendered by KPMG to the Debtors. 

V. I have reviewed the foregoing Application and the facts set forth therein are true 

and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. Moreover, KPMG submits that 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

Debtors. (Jointly Administered) 

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2993 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 17:34:45 Page 1 of

2
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Application complies with applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy 

Rules, the Local Bankruptcy Rules, the United States Trustee Fee Guidelines, and further orders of 

the Court. 

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this 15th day of July 2019. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 _______________________ 

Eugene V. Armstrong 

Principal 

KPMG LLP 

55 Second Street 

Suite 1400 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

415 963 7301 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2993 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 17:34:45 Page 2 of

2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 516 

To extend the payroll tax reduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2013 

Mr. MAFFEI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the payroll tax reduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Middle Class Payroll 

5 Tax Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PAYROLL TAX REDUCTION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 601 of 

8 the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, 

9 and Job Creation Act of 2010 (26 U.S.C. 1401 note) is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘and 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘, 2012, 

11 and 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 516 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to remuneration received, and tax3 able years beginning, after December 31, 2012. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12188 and <greek-i>12189]


Mississippi Disaster Number MS-00039

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi 
(FEMA-1916-DR), dated 05/14/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/01/2010 through 05/02/2010.
    Effective Date: 05/24/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/13/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/14/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Mississippi, dated 05/14/2010, is hereby amended to include the 
following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.
    Primary Counties: Marshall, Union.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-13185 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### James G. Grimes, Appellant, v. Bernard Naughton and Others, as Receivers of Naughton Company and Arthur McMullen, Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul Intlekofer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutrition 21, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006
Paul Intlekofer
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5175 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5175

 To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal the 
             risk corridor program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2014

Mr. Lance (for himself and Mr. Cassidy) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal the 
             risk corridor program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Americans from Illegal 
Bailouts Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE RISK CORRIDOR PROGRAM ESTABLISHED IN PPACA.

    (a) In General.--Section 1342 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18062) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

FTZ 64 was approved by the FTZ Board (the Board) on December 29, 1980 (Board Order 170, 46 FR 1330, 01/06/81) and expanded on September 20, 1985 (Board Order 312, 50 FR 40209, 10/02/85), on December 24, 1986 (Board Order 337, 52 FR 1214, 01/12/87), on October 29, 1991 (Board Order 540, 56 FR 56627, 11/06/91), and on October 7, 2008 (Board Order 1579, 73 FR 61781, 10/17/08).

FTZ 64 currently consists of 7 “sites” totaling some 1,378 acres in the Jacksonville, Florida area. The current update does not alter the physical boundaries that have previously been approved, but instead involves an administrative renumbering of existing Site 3 to separate unrelated, non-contiguous sites for record-keeping purposes.

All sites are located in Jacksonville, Florida. Under this revision, the site list for FTZ 64 will be as follows: Site 1 (67 acres)—within the Jacksonville International Airport at Pecan Park and Terrell Roads; Site 2 (43 acres)—warehouse facility located at 2201 North Ellis Road; Site 3 (809 acres)—JPA Blount Island Terminal Complex, 9620 Dave Rawls Boulevard; Site 4 (200 acres)—within the International Tradeport Complex on Airport Road; Site 5 (4 acres)—warehouse facility located at 1505 Dennis Street; Site 7 (47 acres)—warehouse facility located at the Westlake Industrial Park, 9767 Pritchard Road; Site 8 (75 acres)—located at One Imeson Park Boulevard, within the central western portion of the Imeson International Industrial Park; and, Site 9 (133 acres)—JPA Talleyrand Docks and Terminal Facility, at 2085 Talleyrand Avenue. Site 6 has expired.

                    For further information, contact Maureen Hinman at                     *Maureen.Hinman@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-0627.                

Dated: May 20, 2010.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-13056 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
ex10_2.htm


 

EXHIBIT 10.2

 


Leasing Contrat of Factory

Lessor: Li Huiru

Lessee: Dongguan Qiandaitian Printing, Ltd.

Location: No6# Economic Development Zone, Wushaliwu, Changan Town, Dongguan

Area: 6,000/ sq.m

Tenancy Duration: From 1st, April, 2000 to 31st December,
2010, 10 years.

Rental: Rmb50, 000/month, Rmb600, 000/year.

Other related charge (water, electronic, coal gas and telecom etc.) will be paid by lessee during the rental duration. The lessee will free of rental during the period of decoration which will be 2 months. The lessee have the responsibility to maintain the factory and the maintenance cost if improper and unreasonable use.





Other Rental Term:

a) The lessee will have 3 months rental as compensation if the lessor terminate the rental contract before the duration. Otherwise, the lessee needs to pay same amount compensation to the lessor if the lessee terminates the contract before the tenancy duration.





b) The Lessor need to take all the responsibility if cause loss due to the normal operation of the lessee is affected regarding the problem of property right.





c) The Lessee could decorate the factory according the characteristics of the business in the rental duration and the structure of the factory could not be destroyed; the charge of decoration will be responsible by the lessee.

 



  



  







  





Leasing Contract of Factory (Renewal)

Lessor: Li Jianhui

Lessee: Dongguan Qiandaitian Printing Ltd.

Location: No6# Economic Development Zone, Wushaliwu, Changan Town, Dongguan

Area: 6,000/ sq.m

Tenancy Duration: From 1st January, 2011 to 31st December,
2020, 10 years,

The lessee have the priority if renewal the contract.





Rental:

a) Rmb50, 000/month, Rmb600, 000/year, from the year of 2011 to 2013;

b) Rmb55, 000/month, Rmb660, 000/year, from the year of 2014 to 2016;

c) Rmb60, 500/month, Rmb726, 000/year, from the year of 2017 to 2020.





It will be paid by cash or bank payment.





Other related charge (water, electronic, coal gas and telecom etc.) will be paid by lessee during the tenancy duration. The lessee have the responsibility to maintain the factory and the maintenance cost if improper and unreasonable use.

 

Other Rental Term:

a) The lessee will have 3 months rental as compensation if the lessor terminate the rental contract before the duration. Otherwise, the lessee needs to pay same amount compensation to the lessor if the lessee terminates the contract before the duration.





b) The Lessor need to take all the responsibility if cause loss due to the normal operation of the lessee is affected regarding the problem of property right.





c) The lessee needs to get the approval in writing by the lessor if the additional decoration of the factory is needed. It only could be implemented after the lessor gets related approval by the government department if it must be approved according to the provision.