alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2102 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:27:29 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2102 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:27:29 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2102 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:27:29 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2102 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:27:29 Page 4 of

4
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Thomas L. Conklin v. The Board of Fire *Commissioners.*

Certiorari dismissed and proceedings of the commissioners affirmed.

Opinion by

Brady, J.
**Exhibit 32.1**

Theundersigned officers of AVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certify to their knowledge and in their respective capacities that theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certificationis attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Date: May 10, 2006 | By:    | /s/ UNA S.  RYAN                      |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                    | Name:  | Una S. Ryan, Ph.D.                    |
|                    | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |   |                                  |
|                    |   |                                  |
| Date: May 10, 2006 | By:    | /s/ AVERY W. CATLIN                   |
|                    | Name:  | Avery W. Catlin                       |
|                    | Title: | Senior Vice President and             |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Rob
Hutchinson,  Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. and will be retained by Applied DNA
Sciences,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date:  August 17, 2004                             By: /s/ ROB HUTCHINSON
                                                        -----------------
                                                        Rob Hutchinson
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### J. P. CRISP v. KITCHEN LUMBER COMPANY.

(Filed 20 August, 1930.)

Master and Servant C I) — Where failure to furnish tool is not shown to he cause of injury and injury could not be foreseen, master is not liable.

An employer is not liable in damages to his employee for unanticipated accidents or for failure to furnish an implement when it is purely speculative as to whether the injury would have occurred had it been furnished.

Civil aotioN, before *Moore, J.,*at January Term, 1930, of Graham:.

At tbe conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence there was judgment of non-suit.

*Morphew & Morphew and Moody & Moody for plaintiff.*

*B. L. Phillips for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

In substance tbe case is tbis: Tbe plaintiff and other workmen were engaged in removing trees, logs, stumps and rocks from tbe right of way of a proposed lumber road. Tbe foreman directed tbe plaintiff to assist in rolling a large chestnut log down tbe bill. There was a limb under tbe log, which, according to tbe evidence, projected about two feet beyond tbe log. When tbe log began to roll tbe limb was thereby released and flew up and bit plaintiff on tbe hip, inflicting injury. There was nothing to indicate to tbe foreman that tbe limb was likely to cause injury.

Tbe evidence leaves upon us tbe impression that tbe injury was tbe result of a mishap which sometimes creeps into tbe day’s work without fault or negligence on tbe part of anybody. For such, tbe law creates no liability.

Tbe plaintiff insists that a "peavey” was a tool approved and in general use for moving logs, and that if such an instrument bad been furnished be would not have been injured, but a “peavey” would not have prevented tbe limb from flying up upon being released from tbe log. Tbis contention, therefore, is sheer speculation, based upon tbe theory that tbe plaintiff would have been at tbe end of tbe “peavey” handle and out of reach of tbe flying limb. He might have been so situated at tbe time or might not, depending upon tbe progress of tbe work.

Reviewing tbe entire record, we are of tbe opinion that tbe judgment of nonsuit was properly entered.

AfErmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                        52
<INVENTORY>                                     10,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,675
<PP&E>                                          16,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,666
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,473
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,788
<SALES>                                         22,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,041
<CGS>                                           16,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                       474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,880
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,880
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5102 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the requirement 

for employer disclosure of information on health care coverage of employees who are Medicare beneficiaries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2014 

Mr. LEWIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal 

the requirement for employer disclosure of information 

on health care coverage of employees who are Medicare 

beneficiaries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Employer 

5 Relief Act of 2014’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5102 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEALING SECTION 1862(b)(5) OF THE SOCIAL SE2 CURITY ACT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1862(b) of the Social Se4 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)) is amended by striking 

5 paragraph (5). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact8 ment of this Act and shall apply to information required 

9 to be provided on or after January 1, 2015. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1764

FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, PHD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHERRY R. RHODES, individually and in her official capacity 

as Clerk of Court for Marion County; MARK W. RICHARDSON, 

individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of 

Marion County; LEVON NICHOLS, a/k/a Levern Nichols, 

individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff 

of Marion County; ALBERT WOODBERRY, individually and in his 

official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Marion County; MITCHE 

MCCASKILL, individually and in his official capacity as 

Deputy Sheriff of Marion County; CW JOHNSON, individually 

and in his official capacity as Marion County Jailor; TIM 

HARPER, individually and in his official capacity as County 

Administrator; JOHN Q. ATKINSON, individually and in his 

official capacity as member of Marion County Council; ELOSIE 

W. ROGERS, individually and in her official capacity as 

member of Marion County Council; TOM SHAW, individually and 

in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; 

ALLEN FLOYD, individually and in his official capacity as 

member of Marion County Council; MILTON TROY, individually 

and in his official capacity as member of Marion County 

Council; PEARLY BRITT, individually and in his official 

capacity as member of Marion County Council; ELISTA H. 

SMITH, individually and in her official capacity as member 

of Marion County Council; AE MOREHEAD, individually and in 

his official Capacity as Family Court Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:10-cv-03234-TLW-TER)
2

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin C. Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, 

WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Franklin C. Reaves seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing several Defendants from his civil suit. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Reaves seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Augustin I. Ambler v. Rodney M. Whipple.

*Debt—Action of—Limitations—Judgment.*

In an action of debt on a judgment of a court of record of another State, this court holds that the same was barred by the statute of limitations.

[Opinion filed June 2, 1890.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Julius S. Grinnell, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. A. I. Ambler *pro se,*Henry Decker, Henry Booth, and James B. Doolittle, for appellant.

Messrs. Stiles *&*Lewis, for appellee.

Garnett J.

This action of debt was brought by appellant on the 17th day of July, 1885, on a judgment rendered June 17, 1880, by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, against appellee and Thomas S. Dickinson. Appellee alone having been served with process, appeared and set up among other defenses, that the cause of action did not accrue within five years before this suit was commenced. Briefly stated, the real controversy is whether the judgment sued on is one of *23the causes of action described in See. 15, Chap. 83, Rev. Stat. If it is, the right of action was barred one month before this suit was commenced.

Construing this section of the statute in Bemis v. Stanley, 93 Ill. 230, which was an action on a judgment rendered in Ohio, the decision of the court was: “ Our view of the question is, that Section 15 is broad enough to embrace the judgment sued upon in this case; that the suit on the judgment is a civil action not otherwise specially provided for, and hence, barred in five years by the terms and conditions of the statute.” Jefferson v. Alexander, 84 Ill. 278, decides that the judgment of a court of record is an instrument of writing, a copy of which is required by the Practice Act to be filed with the declaration in a suit on the judgment. If it is an instrument in writing, it would also seem to be an evidence of indebtedness in writing, and governed by Sec. 16, Chap. 83, which makes the limitation for indebtedness of that character ten years, and thus an apparent conflict arises between Jefferson v. Alexander, and Bemis v. Stanley. The latter, however, is the latest declaration of the law, and mature consideration has not convinced ns that this court should depart from the law, as there held, although new reasons are presented for a contrary holding which do not appear to have been then considered.

Under such circumstances, while we may entertain strong doubts, we think it more consistent with the duty of a subordinate court to leave the question for the court of final resort.

The judgment is affirmed. *Judgment affirmed.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


The Board of Directors
Packeteer, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 333-112294, 333-102739, 333-99171 and 333-65212) of Packeteer,
Inc. of our report dated January 21, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Packeteer, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive (loss) income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three
year period ended December 31, 2003 which report appears in the December 31,
2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Packeteer, Inc.

                                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
March 5, 2004
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2457

To amend section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, to permit receipt

of in-kind consideration anywhere on an installation for the lease of

property on the installation, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 25, 2000

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend section 2667 of title 10, United States Code,

to permit receipt of in-kind consideration anywhere on

an installation for the lease of property on the installation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF IN-KIND CONSIDERATION AU4 THORIZED FOR LEASES OF PROPERTY AT

5 MILITARY INSTALLATIONS.

6 (a) EXPANSION.—Subsection (b)(5) of section 2667

7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking

8 ‘‘substantial’’.
2

•S 2457 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Subsection (f) of that

2 section is amended—

3 (1) by striking paragraph (4); and

4 (2) by redesignating paragraph (5) as para5 graph (4).

Æ
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5127 

To allow funds under title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education 

Act of 1965 to be used to provide training to school personnel regarding 

how to recognize child sexual abuse. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2014 

Mr. TAKANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To allow funds under title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to be used to provide 

training to school personnel regarding how to recognize 

child sexual abuse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Schools Pro5 tect Our Children Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5127 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 Section 2103(a) of the Elementary and Secondary 

3 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6603(a)) is amended 

4 by striking ‘‘2002’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

5 SEC. 3. TRAINING TEACHERS TO RECOGNIZE CHILD SEX6 UAL ABUSE. 

7 (a) STATE ACTIVITIES.—Section 2113(c) of the Ele8 mentary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

9 6613(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(19) Providing training for all school per11 sonnel, including teachers, principals, and pupil serv12 ices personnel, regarding how to recognize child sex13 ual abuse.’’. 

14 (b) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY ACTIVITIES.— 

15 Section 2123(a) of the Elementary and Secondary Edu16 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6623(a)) is amended by 

17 inserting after paragraph (8) the following: 

18 ‘‘(9) Providing training for all school personnel, 

19 including teachers, principals, and pupil services per20 sonnel, regarding how to recognize child sexual 

21 abuse.’’. 

22 (c) ELIGIBLE PARTNERSHIP ACTIVITIES.—Section 

23 2134(a) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

24 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6634(a)) is amended— 

25 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

26 after the semicolon; 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5127 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking the period 

2 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(3) providing training for school personnel, in5 cluding teachers, principals, and pupil services per6 sonnel, regarding how to recognize child sexual 

7 abuse.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Holiday Moving & Storage Company, 

Minor Moving LLC, and Apple Moving 

LLC d/b/a Apple Moving El Paso,

 

 Appellants,

v.

Concepcion Martinez Alonzo, 

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00192-CV

Appeal from the

327thDistrict Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2019DCV1579)

O R D E R

The Court has this day considered Appellants’ unopposed motion requesting a stay of trial 

court proceedings pending appeal and concludes that the motion should be GRANTED. The 327th

District Court is directed to stay all proceedings, including discovery, in cause number 

2019DCV1579, styled Holiday Moving & Storage Company, Minor Moving LLC, and Apple 

Moving LLC d/b/a Apple Moving El Paso v. Concepcion Martinez Alonzo, pending disposition of 

this appeal or further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

CALIFORNIA SURVEYING & DRAFTING 

SUPPLY INC

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

CALIFORNIA SURVEYING & DRAFTING SUPPLY INC

4733 AUBURN BLVD 

SACRAMENTO, CA 95841

ATTN: BRUCE GANDELMAN

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: June 18, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F California Surveying & 

Drafting Supply, Inc.

$73,172 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 2861 California Surveying & 

Drafting Supply, Inc.

$73,172 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 3365 California Surveying & 

Drafting Supply, Inc.

$57,895.62 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2576 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 13:40:46 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2576 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 13:40:46 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sequans Communications S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Deborah Choate, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 31, 2014



|    |  |                                                    
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Deborah Choate                                 
|    |  | Name: Deborah Choate Title: Chief Financial
Officer