alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                        FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin
C. Quinn, President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:    May 6, 2005                        /s/Kevin C. Quinn
                                            ---------------------------
                                               Kevin C. Quinn
                                               President
*Exhibit 32(a)*
**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
          I, Michael P. DiMino, President and Chief Executive Officer of LESCO, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2005 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Michael P. DiMino    Michael P. DiMino  President and Chief Executive Officer     Date:May 5, 2005  
30
#### Mari A. Cuming, Appellant, v. William M. Whiting, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide event. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
#### THE HOWE MACHINE COMPANY, Respondent, *v.*EZRA FARRINGTON, Appellant.

*Bond to secure debts to become due from an agent*— *surety not discharged by the failure of the principal to disclose previous failures of the agent to account*— *what declarations admissible as part of the res gestee.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff, entered on tbe report of a referee.

Tbe action was upon a bond executed by one Davis and tbe defendant, as bis surety, conditioned for tbe payment of tbe indebtedness of Davis to tbe plaintiff, tben or thereafter existing. Davis was tbe agent of tbe obligee for tbe sale of machines. The plaintiff was to deliver to him machines for sale, and he was to make reports of sales and to remit proceeds weekly and to return to tbe company, on demand, all machines not sold. At tbe time of tbe execution of tbe bond Davis was indebted to tbe plaintiff for machines previously delivered to him, and be became further indebted for machines delivered from time to time after tbe execution of tbe bond.

The court at General Term after considering certain objections raised by tbe appellant, and overruling them said: “ Another position taken by the- appellant’s counsel is that at tbe time when tbe bond in suit was given, Davis was repeatedly and largely in default in respect to machines furnished to him by tbe plaintiff, which fact tbe plaintiff well knew but did- not disclose to tbe defendant. As we understand tbe rulings of tbe court of last resort in this State, those circumstances constitute no defense to an action against a surety for a *debt*or the like, in tbe absence of connivance or gross negligence. *(McJTechnie*v. *Ward,*58 N. Y., 541; *Atlantic and Pacific Telegraph Oo.*v. *Barnes,*64 id., 385.) However, it may be as to one who becomes surety for tbe *honesty*of another. (Id.)

“ It is contended that the declarations of Davis were not evidence that be received tbe machines, as against the defendant. Tbe proof was expressly limited to declarations made by him during tbe period of tbe consignments and after tbe execution of the *592bond in suit, and consisted of admissions made by him of the correctness of plaintiff’s books on their being exhibited to him. The declarations were, therefore, a part of the *res gestae*and were admissible. It would have been otherwise if they had been made after the transactions were closed, for which the surety was bound. (1 Gr. Ev., § 187; *Hatch*v. *Elkins,*65 N. Y., 489; *Tenth National Bank*v. *Harragh,*1 Iiun, 111; *Horn*v. Pen*?/, 14 id., 409.”)

*Thomas Gorlett,*for the appellant. *M. A.*Whitney, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Smith, J.;

MulliN, P. J., and Talcott, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 248-1 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:02:10 Page 1

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 248-1 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:02:10 Page 2

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 248-1 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:02:10 Page 3

of 3
Exhibit 1 

Base Audit Engagement Letters

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 1

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 2

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 3

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 4

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 5

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 6

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 7

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 8

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 9

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 10

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 11

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 12

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 13

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 14

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 15

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 16

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 17

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 18

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 19

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 20

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 21

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 22

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 23

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 24

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 25

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 26

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 27

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 28

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 29

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 30

of 31
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2198-2 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 18:16:43 Page 31

of 31
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,346,000
<SECURITIES>                                17,700,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  851,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (122,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,850,000
<PP&E>                                       3,186,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (717,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,364,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,051,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,301,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,364,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,712,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,542,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               126,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,710,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,710,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EX-34 (h)
(logo) Grant Thornton

Accountants and Business Advisors


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors and Shareholders
LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria ("Management's
Report"), that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage backed
securities for which the Company served as third-party property tax payment
provider on the underlying collateral (the "Platform") as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and
1122(d)(4)(xiii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Irvine, CA
February 20, 2007


18400 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92612-0525
T 949.553.1600
F 949.553.0168
W www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP
US member of Grant Thornton International
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DONALD EUGENE WINFREE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 318 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2919 Filed: 07/10/19 Entered: 07/10/19 14:31:03 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2919 Filed: 07/10/19 Entered: 07/10/19 14:31:03 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2919 Filed: 07/10/19 Entered: 07/10/19 14:31:03 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2919 Filed: 07/10/19 Entered: 07/10/19 14:31:03 Page 4 of

4
exv10w9w2






Exhibit 10.9.2




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

HUBBELL INCORPORATED GRANTOR TRUST FOR

SENIOR MANAGEMENT PLANS




     WHEREAS, Hubbell Incorporated (the “Company”) and The Bank of New York Mellon (the “Trustee”)
have entered into a trust agreement dated the 14th day of March, 2005 (the “Trust
Agreement”) to establish the Hubbell Incorporated Grantor Trust for Senior Management Plans (the
“Trust”), which Trust Agreement was subsequently amended by the First Amendment to the Trust
Agreement, effective January 1, 2005;



     WHEREAS, that pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Trust Agreement, the Trust may be amended prior
to a Change of Control by the Company with the written consent of the Trustee;



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Trust Agreement to reflect the addition of a Plan to
be covered by the Trust;



     WHEREAS, the Trustee hereby agrees to such amendment;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of June 1, 2009, as
follows:



     1. By amending Section 1.1(n) of the Trust Agreement to read in its entirety as follows:



     “(n) “Plan” (and collectively, “Plans”) shall mean any of (i) any Continuity
Agreement between the Company and any of its senior executives, (ii) the Hubbell Incorporated
Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, (iii) the Hubbell Incorporated Top Hat
Restoration Plan, or (iv) the Hubbell Incorporated Supplemental Management Retirement Plan, each as
from time to time may be amended.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Hubbell Incorporated has caused this Second Amendment to be executed by
its Secretary this 3rd day of June, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	HUBBELL INCORPORATED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Richard W. Davies
 	 
	 	 	Richard W. Davies 	 
	 	 	Vice President and Secretary 	 
	 




     AGREED and ACCEPTED, The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of the Trust, hereby agrees and
accepts the foregoing Second Amendment to the Trust Agreement.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:    	/s/ Elaine White
 	 
	 	Name:  	Elaine White 	 
	 	Title:  	Vice President	 
	 	Date:  	6/17/09
Fifth Department,

June Term, 1895.

#### David *D.*Clancey, as Assignee, etc., Respondent, v. Thomas H. Groves, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.
aspen72109exh101.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing






	 	Exhibit 10.1



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION

     This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION is entered to this 21st day of July, 2009, to be effective as of August 1, 2009 by and between ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION, a public Delaware corporation, Suite 208, 2050 S. Oneida Street, Denver, CO 80224, (303) 639-9860 (“ASPEN”), and R. V. BAILEY, P.O. Box 1420 (current office is located at 515 Jerry St. but no mail is delivered to this address), Castle Rock, CO 80104, (303) 660-0966 (“BAILEY”), sometimes collectively referred to as the “Parties.”


	WITNESSETH



     WHEREAS, ASPEN entered into an employment agreement with BAILEY effective as of January 1, 2009 which agreement will expire July 31, 2009 unless extended; and

     WHEREAS, ASPEN wishes to extend the existing Employment Agreement through December 31, 2009.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the conditions and covenants set forth, it is agreed that the employment agreement with BAILEY effective as of January 1, 2009 be and hereby is amended, effective as of August 1, 2009, so that:

	A.      	Paragraph 1 (“EMPLOYMENT”) reads as follows: 
	 
	 	1.      EMPLOYMENT:    Effective as of January 1, 2009 ASPEN hereby employs BAILEY, and BAILEY hereby agrees to be employed by ASPEN in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. BAILEY and ASPEN hereby agree that BAILEY shall be employed by ASPEN for a period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (the “EMPLOYMENT PERIOD”) unless such employment is terminated at an earlier date as described in Section 6 of the existing Employment Agreement.   
	 


	B.      	Paragraph 4(b) (“LOCATION”) reads as follows: 
	 
	 	(b) During the term of this Agreement, BAILEY may continue to utilize office equipment (including computer equipment and accessories) that ASPEN owns and which are located at BAILEY’S office in Castle Rock, Colorado. Such equipment may be upgraded from time to time during the term of this Agreement. BAILEY may, at his option, purchase such office equipment from ASPEN at any time on or before December 31, 2009, for a total purchase price of $100.00. 
	 
	C.      	Except as specifically amended hereby the existing Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect. 


 

			
	Employment Agreement R. V. BAILEY  	  	Page 1  








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of ASPEN has approved this Agreement by resolutions dated July 20, 2009, and the Parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the first day of August 2009.

ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION


	By: 

_________________________________

Robert A. Cohan, President



Date: July ___, 2009




	EMPLOYEE




	By: 

_________________________________

R. V. Bailey, Employee



Date: July ___, 2009



			
	Employment Agreement R. V. BAILEY  	  	Page 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter
Brocklesby,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                     /s/ PETER BROCKLESBY
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Peter Brocklesby
                                                     President
                                                     August 3, 2005
CONTRA COSTA ELECTRIC, INC.’S NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN

U.S. Dist. Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case Nos. 19-30088 and 19-30089 (DM)

S:\ALRDOCS\30667\1\00229207.DOCX

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LEONIDOU & ROSIN

Professional Corporation

A. Robert Rosin (SBN 115245)

arrosin@alr-law.com

Gregory S. Gerson (SBN 318795)

ggerson@alr-law.com

777 Cuesta Drive, Suite 200

Mountain View, CA 94040

Telephone: (650) 691-2888

Attorneys for Creditor

CONTRA COSTA ELECTRIC, INC.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

CONTRA COSTA ELECTRIC, INC.’S

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN

(11 USC §§ 546 and 362)

TO THE CLERK OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, THE DEBTORS, AND ALL OTHER 

INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

You are hereby notified that Contra Costa Electric, Inc. (hereinafter “CCE”) hereby 

perfects and continues to perfect, under 11 United States Code Sections 546(b) and 362(b)(3), its 

mechanic’s lien in the principal amount, after deducting all credits and offsets, of $14,000, for 

labor, equipment, material, and services provided by CCE, generally described as welding work, 

incorporated in and constituting improvements to the real property commonly known as 1205 

National Drive, Livermore, California 94550. The purported owner of the property in question is 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2313 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 14:33:54 Page 1 of

2
CONTRA COSTA ELECTRIC, INC.’S NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN

U.S. Dist. Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case Nos. 19-30088 and 19-30089 (DM)

S:\ALRDOCS\30667\1\00229207.DOCX

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (hereinafter, "PGE"), 6030 West Oaks Boulevard, Suite 300, Rocklin, 

California 95765. CCE furnished the above-described labor, equipment, materials and services 

at the special instance and request of, and pursuant to a contract with, PGE. This Notice 

constitutes the legal equivalent of having recorded a mechanic's lien and then having commenced 

a suit to foreclose upon the mechanic’s lien. 

You are further notified that CCE intends to enforce the lien to the fullest extent allowed 

by bankruptcy law and California law. This pleading does not constitute an admission as to the 

necessity of any such seizure or commencement.

Dated: May 31, 2019 LEONIDOU & ROSIN

Professional Corporation

By__________/s/ A. Robert Rosin_____________

 A. Robert Rosin

 Attorneys for 

Contra Costa Electric, Inc. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2313 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 14:33:54 Page 2 of

2