alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Keisha Marie Harmon v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00457

- CR

Trial court case number: 1008764

Trial court: 252nd District Court of Jefferson C ounty

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above

- referenced

appeal is frivolous and a motion to withdraw as counsel. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738,

744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967).

The motion to withdraw as couns el is ordered taken with the case

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 12, 2012

It is so ORDERED.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Infrastructure
Materials Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-K”) of
the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      October 11, 2010/s/ Todd D. MontgomeryTodd
      D. MontgomeryChief
      Executive OfficerInfrastructure
      Materials Corp.Dated:
      October 11, 2010/s/ Rakesh MalhotraRakesh
      MalhotraChief
      Financial OfficerInfrastructure
      Materials Corp.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Infrastructure Materials Corp. and will be retained by Infrastructure Materials
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2801 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 11:23:30 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2801 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 11:23:30 Page 2 of

3
EXHIBIT A

Notice Parties Service List

Served as set forth below

DESCRIPTION NAME NOTICE NAME ADDRESS EMAIL

METHOD OF

SERVICE

Counsel to Debtors Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Jessica Liou, 

Matthew Goren

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

stephen.karotkin@weil.com

jessica.liou@weil.com

matthew.goren@weil.com

First Class Mail & Email

Counsel to Debtors Keller & Benvenutti LLP Attn: Tobias Keller, Jane Kim

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com

jkim@kellerb envenutti.com First Class Mail & Email

Debtors

PG&E Corporation and 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company Attn: Janet Loduca

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94105 First Class Mail

Office of the United States Trustee Office of the United States Trustee 

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq. & Timothy 

Lafreddi, Esq

450 Golden Gate Avenue

5th Floor, Suite #05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102

James.L.Snyder@usdoj.gov

timothy.s.laffredi@usdoj.gov

First Class Mail & Email

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Samuel A. 

Khalil

55 Hudson Yards

New York, NY 10001-2163

ddunne@milbank.com

skhalil@milbank.com First Class Mail & Email

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Milbank LLP

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon, Gregory A. 

Bray, Thomas R. Kreller

2029 Century Park E, 33rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Paronzon@milbank.com

Gbray@milbank.com

TKreller@milbank.com First Class Mail & Email

Fee Examiner Attn: Bruce A. Markell

541 N. Fairbanks Court, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 90067 First Class Mail

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2801 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 11:23:30 Page 3 of

3
EXHIBIT C 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3095-3 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 13:05:10 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT C 

EXPENSE SUMMARY 

JANUARY 29, 2019 THROUGH MAY 31, 2019 

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Meals $4,622.22 

Travel – Airfare $28,147.11 

Travel – Hotel $48,157.51 

Travel – Ground (Local) $80.20 

Travel – Ground (Out of Town) $11,826.18 

Copying Charges $4,330.01 

Computer Research – Outside $258.80 

Messenger $1,172.42 

Staff Overtime $37.50 

Air Express $219.66 

Other Expenses $512.04 

Total Expenses Requested: $99,363.65 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3095-3 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 13:05:10 Page 2

of 2
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

June 15, 2016 
 Jack Callicutt 

CFO, Galectin Therapeutics 
 Dear Jack, 

The future of the Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. and the investment of its shareholders are dependent upon the successful completion of the company’s ongoing
clinical trials over the next few months. We are proud of the talented management team that we have assembled, and the Company has determined that it is in its best interest to assure that the team remains in place and working on the important
matters before us at least through March 1, 2017. 
 To this end, this letter, if accepted below by you, confirms the agreement of Galectin
Therapeutics, Inc. to pay you a retention bonus of $50,000 on March 1, 2017 provided that you remain an employee of the company on that date. The bonus will also be paid if in advance of that date, your employment is terminated by the company
without “Cause” or if you terminate your employment for “Good Reason”, as those terms on defined on Exhibit A attached. The bonus payment will be subject to normal payroll taxes and withholdings. 

Thank you for your continued service to Galectin Therapeutics, and I appreciate your commitment to the important work in which we are engaged. 

All the best, 
 /s/ Peter G. Traber, MD 

Peter G. Traber, MD 
 CEO, Galectin Therapeutics 

I agree to the terms of this retention bonus: 
 /s/ Jack
Callicutt 
  
  







 EXHIBIT A 

(A) For purposes of this letter the term “Cause” means you: 
  

	 	(i)	Fail or refuse in any material respect to perform any duties, consistent with your current position or those of an executive character that may reasonably be assigned to you by the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, or materially violate company policy or procedure; 

  

	 	(ii)	Are grossly negligent in the performance of your duties; 

  

	 	(iii)	Commit any act of fraud, willful misappropriation of funds, embezzlement or material dishonesty with respect to the Company; 

  

	 	(iv)	Are convicted of a felony or other criminal violation, which, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, could materially impair the Company from substantially meeting its business objectives; 


 

	 	(v)	Engage in any other intentional misconduct adversely affecting the business or affairs of the Company in a material manner; provided that for this purpose the phrase “intentional misconduct adversely affecting the
business or affairs of the Company” shall mean such misconduct that is detrimental to the business or the reputation of the Company as it is perceived both by the general public and the biotechnology industry. 


(B) For purposes of this letter, the term “Good Reason” means the occurrence of any of the following without your consent: 

 

	 	(i)	Any involuntary removal of you from your present office of the Company without you being appointed to a comparable or higher position in the Company; 


 

	 	(ii)	Any reduction in your base salary or bonus potential; 

  

	 	(iii)	The relocation of your principal place of employment more than fifty (50) miles from its location on the date hereof; or 

  

	 	(iv)	The Company ceases to operate.
#### Timothy Berry, Respondent, v. James B. Berry and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2098 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:15:56 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2098 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:15:56 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2098 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:15:56 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2098 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:15:56 Page 4 of

4
#### Beth Israel Hospital North, Respondent, v Castle Oil Corporation, Appellant.

Submitted November 6, 1995;

decided December 28, 1995

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order which affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Meg A. Gentle, Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: March 1, 2011





/s/ MEG A. GENTLEMeg A. GentleChief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 1 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 2 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 3 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 4 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 5 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 6 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 7 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 8 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 9 of

35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 10

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 11

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 12

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 13

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 14

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 15

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 16

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 17

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 18

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 19

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 20

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 21

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 22

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 23

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 24

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 25

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 26

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 27

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 28

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 29

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 30

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 31

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 32

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 33

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 34

of 35
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2324 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:22:22 Page 35

of 35
#### Bernard Kunkel, by Next Friend, v. City of Chicago.

*Municipal Corporations—Negligence—Personal Injuries.*

In an action brought to recover from a municipality for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by its negligence, this court holds that whether the time that had elapsed since the post holes which caused the injury had been empty was such as to constitute notice thereof to the city, was for the jury to decide, and that the judgment for the defendant can not stand.

[Opinion filed November 11, 1890.]

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

Mr. George E. Swartz, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Gary, J.

Why the Superior Court directed a verdict for the defendant, the City of Chicago, we are not informed by the abstract, and the city has filed no brief. The record shows that on Johnson street was a plank sidewalk, six feet *326wide, raised three or four feet from the ground, on the side of which, next to the traveled street, there had been a railing affixed to posts coming up through holes six inches square in the plank, near the edge of the sidewalk.

Some two months before the accident which is the subject of this suit, that railing, with the posts to which it had been affixed, had been removed by the owner of the lot fronting the place of the accident, leaving the holes which the posts had filled, open.

The plaintiff, a boy then six years old, was playing on the sidewalk, throwing and catching a *“*bean bag,” and as the little girl playing with him threw the bag toward him it went too high for him to catch, and he stepped backward into one of the holes, and suffered the injury of which he complains in this suit. These facts made a case for the jury to pass upon.

The time that had elapsed since the postshad been removed made it a question for the jury whether the city had notice of the holes in the sidewalk. Chicago v. Fowler, 60 Ill. 322; Powers v. Chicago, 20 Ill. App. 178; both cases of days, instead of months, during which the defects had existed.

The question of the duty of the city toward children using the sidewalk as a place of recreation is settled in favor of the boy by Chicago v. Keefe, 114 Ill. 222.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*lieversed mid rema/nded.*
Exhibit






PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.
ARTICLES SUPPLEMENTARY




Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland (the “Department”) that:


FIRST:  Under a power contained in Article VI of the charter of the Corporation (the “Charter”), the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors”), by duly adopted resolutions, classified and designated an additional 2,000,000 authorized but unissued shares (the “Shares”) of Preferred Stock (as defined in the Charter) as shares of Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Corporation (the “Series A Preferred Stock”).  The total number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock which the Corporation has authority to issue after giving effect to these Articles Supplementary is 3,050,000.  There has been no increase in the authorized shares of stock of the Corporation effected by these Articles Supplementary.


SECOND:  A description of the preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms and conditions of redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock is contained in the Articles Supplementary filed with, and accepted for record by, the Department on October 31, 2011, as amended by the Articles of Amendment filed with, and accepted for record by, the Department on June 26, 2014.


THIRD:  The Shares have been classified and designated by the Board of Directors under the authority contained in the Charter.


FOURTH:  These Articles Supplementary have been approved by the Board of Directors in the manner and by the vote required by law.


FIFTH:  The undersigned acknowledges these Articles Supplementary to be the corporate act of the Corporation and, as to all matters or facts required to be verified under oath, the undersigned acknowledges that, to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, these matters and facts are true in all material respects and that this statement is made under the penalties for perjury.














[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles Supplementary to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its Chief Executive Officer and attested by its Secretary on this 7th day of June, 2016.


ATTEST:                    PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.






_/s/ Jeffrey R. Sprain_____________        By:  _/s/ John A. Williams________________ (SEAL)
Name:  Jeffrey R. Sprain                    Name:  John A. Williams
Title:  Secretary                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer


-2-
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

THOMAS H. PUSEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-2080

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Respondent. )

)

Opinion filed November 27, 2019. 

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit

Court for Charlotte County; George C.

Richards, Judge. 

 

Thomas H. Pusey, pro se. 

 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Lindsay D. Turner,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

LaROSE, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	RELEASE: U.S., Trinidad and Tobago to Conduct Joint Military Exercise
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">RELEASE: U.S., Trinidad and Tobago to Conduct Joint Military Exercise</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published March 23, 2018</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>MIAMI – Trinidad and Tobago will host defense, interagency and law enforcement partners from the United States for exercise Fused Response, April 16-26.  </p>
<p>Barbados, an important regional partner, will provide logistical and staging support to portions of the exercise.</p>
<p>This is the first time Trinidad and Tobago will host the annual multilateral exercise, which is aimed at strengthening relationships, building capacity and expanding cooperation among participating defense and security forces. </p>
<p>The exercise includes realistic scenarios that test regional stability and challenge the skills of participants, while providing opportunities to develop professionally.  </p>
<p>The exercise combines simulated computer-based training with hands-on field training. Helicopters and cargo planes add to the realistic training environment while supporting exercise objectives. </p>
<p>Fused Response reflects the commitment of participating countries to work collaboratively with security partners in the region, strengthen longstanding ties, and enhance interoperability between nations</p><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jane Luciano, Esq. CA. SBN 124263

Luciano Law

9000 Crow Canyon Road

Suite S #168

Danville, CA 94506

(925) 216-6030

William D. McCann, Esq SBN NV 12038

P.O. Box 370

Genoa, Nevada 89411

Pro Haec Vice in Butte County Superior Court Cases

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Claimants Liza Sims, individually and 

Thomas and Jaydene Gardner

UNTIED STAES BANKRUPCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

 In re: 

 Bankr. Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

 PG&E CORPOIRATION, Chapter 11

 (Lead Case) (Jointly Administered)

 

 -and- PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR 

 JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT 

 OF OBJECTION FILED 

 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CONTEMPORANEOUSLY 

 HEREWITH 

 COMPANY 

 Hearing: May 24, 2023

Debtors. Time: 10:00 AM 

 Place: Tele- video conference

 United States Bankruptcy Court

X Affects Both Debtors Courtroom 17. 16th Floor

 San Francisco, CA 94102

______________________________________ {Related to Doc# 13685)

 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, Plaintiff’s Request this Honorable Court take

Judicial Notice of the facts contained in the following:

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13712 Filed: 05/10/23 Entered: 05/10/23 07:16:56 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1. The March 23, 2020 Press release of the District Attorney in and for Butte County

attached to the Declaration of Jane Luciano as Exhibit “1”and referenced in Plaintiff’s Objection

as Exhibit “1”.

2. The interview of the Hon. Michael Ramsay District Attorney of Butte County

conducted by CAPRadio on January 9, 2022 and quoted at page 3 of Plaintiffs Objection as 

follows:

https://www.capradio.org/articles/2022/01/09/interview-butte-county-district-attorney-onprosecuting-pge-for-another-wildfire/

3. The Transcript of the Butte County Grand Jury Investigation of PG and E referenced

as Exhibit “4” in Plaintiff’s Objection as follows:

 https://interactive.abc10.com/pdfs/KXTV_PGE_Grand_Jury_Binder.pdf

May 9, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Jane Luciano/s/

Jane Luciano

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13712 Filed: 05/10/23 Entered: 05/10/23 07:16:56 Page 2

of 2