ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

GREG ABBOTT 

September 1,2004 

The Honorable David M. Motley 

Kerr County Attorney 

County Courthouse, Suite BA- 103 

700 Main Street 

Kerrville, Texas 78028 

Opinion No. GA-0244 

Re: Whether the judge of the Kerr County 

constitutional county court must hear certain 

matters at the Kerrville State Hospital and is 

entitled to a salary supplement for doing so 

(RQ-0197-GA) 

Dear Mr. Motley: 

You ask whether the judge of the Kerr County constitutional county court must hear certain 

matters at the Kerrville State Hospital and is entitled to a salary supplement for doing so.’ 

I. Background 

Title 7, subtitle C of the Health and Safety Code, the Texas Mental Health Code, see TEX. 

HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. @ 571.001-578.008 (Vernon 2003 & Supp. 2004); see also id. 

8 571.001 (Vernon 2003) (short title), pertains to mentally ill individuals’ care and treatment. Under 

chapter 573, an individual who is believed to be mentally ill may be detained on an emergency basis. 

See id. $5 573.001-.026 (Vernon 2003 & Supp. 2004). Under chapter 574, a prosecutor or another 

adult may apply for court-ordered mental health care for an individual who may be mentally ill. See 

id. 9 574.001(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004); Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0287 (2000) at 2. Generally, the 

application must be filed with the county clerk in the county in which the proposed patient resides, 

is found, or is already receiving mental health services. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 

5 574.001(b) (Vernon Supp. 2004). Chapter 574, subchapter C provides for proceedings for courtordered mental health services. See id. $5 574.031-,037 (Vernon 2003 & Supp. 2004). Upon 

making certain findings, a judge may order that a person receive temporary or extended inpatient or 

outpatient mental health services. See id. @ 574.034(a) (Vernon 2003) (temporary inpatient 

services), (b) (temporary outpatient services), 574.035(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004) (extended inpatient 

services), (b) (extended outpatient services). Subchapter E provides for post-commitment 

proceedings to modify the terms of a commitment order. See id. $3 574.061-,070 (Vernon 2003). 

‘See Letter from Honorable David M. Motley, Kerr County Attorney, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Texas 

Attorney General (Mar. 8, 2004) ( on f I 1 e with the Opinion Committee; also available of http://www.oag.state.tu.us) 

[her&m&r Request Letter]. 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 2 (GA-0244) 

The costs for a hearing or proceeding under the Texas Mental Health Code are paid by: 

(1) the county that initiates emergency detention procedures 

under Subchapter A or B, Chapter 573; or 

(2) if no emergency detention procedures are initiated, the 

county that accepts an application for court-ordered mental health 

services, issues an order for protective custody, or issues an order for 

temporary mental health services. 

Id. $ 571.018(a). In addition, “[tlhe county responsible for the costs of a hearing or proceeding 

. . shall pay the costs of all subsequent hearings or proceedings for that person under this subtitle 

until the person is discharged from mental health services. The costs shall be billed by the clerk of 

the court conducting the hearings.” Id. 4 571.018(b). 

You state that Kerr County is served by two county courts, the constitutional county court 

and a county court at law. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 

§ 25.1351 (Vernon 2004) (“Kerr County has one statutory county court, the County Court at Law 

of Kerr County.“). The Kerrville State Hospital, a Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental 

Retardation facility that serves 27 counties, is located in Kerr County. See Request Letter, supra 

note 1, at 1. Eighty percent of the patients committed to the hospital are from other counties. See 

id. Traditionally, the constitutional county court “has heard mental health commitment hearings for 

all cases at the Kerrville State Hospital.” Id. at 2. “[A]pproximately 80% of these cases originate 

from counties other than Kerr County.” Id. These cases are heard at the hospital, “away from the 

county courthouse where the County Court customarily holds hearings.” Id. 

Your questions pertain to the Kerr County constitutional county court’s duty to hear mental 

health commitment hearings at the state hospital and the judge’s entitlement to receive a salary 

supplement for doing so. As background to your questions, you explain that in 1999, the Kerr 

County Commissioners Court approved a $10.00 “judicial salary supplement fee” to be charged in 

mental health cases pursuant to section 574.031(i) of the Health and Safety Code. See id. The 

county’s 2003-2004 budget included a line item to pay the constitutional county court judge a salary 

supplement in an amount equal to the estimated number of mental health hearings to be held away 

from the county courthouse multiplied by $10.00. See id. The commissioners court “approved 

payment of. [the] salary supplement to the judge in the budget; however, such approval was on 

the express condition that the judge’s salary to be paid by Kerr County should be reduced by an 

amount equal to such approved salary supplement in the County Court budget, and reduced the 

judge’s salary accordingly.” Id. 

II. Analvsis 

A. The Constitutional County Court’s Duty to Hold Mental Health Commitment 

Hearings at the State Hospital 

You first ask whether “the judge of the Constitutional County Court of Kerr County 

[is] required by the Constitution or state statutes to hear all of the mental health commitment 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 3 (GA-0244) 

hearings held at Kerrville State Hospital, including those from counties other than Kerr Cotmty[.]” 

Request Letter, supra note 1, at 3. This question requires us to address which Kerr County courts 

have jurisdiction over these proceedings, including proceedings involving persons horn other 

counties, and where in the county such proceedings are to be held. 

You ask about the Kerr County constitutional county court’s duties. Article V, section 15 

of the Texas Constitution establishes a county court in each county. See TEX. CONST. art. V, 5 15.2 

Under the constitution, “The County Court has jurisdiction as provided by law. The County Judge 

is the presiding officer of the County Court and has judicial hmctions as provided by law.” Id. 5 16. 

In addition to the constitutional county court, Kerr County has a county court at law. See TEX. 

GOV’T CODE ANN. 5 25.1351 (Vernon 2004) (“Kerr County has one statutory county court, the 

County Court at Law of Kerr County.“). Although you inform us that the constitutional county court 

in Kerr County has traditionally heard all mental health proceedings in the county, the Government 

Code provides the Kerr County constitutional county court and county court at law with concurrent 

jurisdiction over proceedings under the Texas Mental Health Code. See id. 5 25.1352(b) (“In 

addition to the jurisdiction provided by Section 25.0003 and other law, a county court at law in Kerr 

County has: (1) concurrent jurisdiction with the district court in proceedings under the Family Code; 

and (2) concurrent with the county court, the jurisdiction ofaprobate court in proceedings under 

Chapter 462, Health and Safety Code, and Subtitle C, Title 7, Health and Safety Code.“) (emphasis 

added).’ In addition, section 574.008(a) ofthe Health and Safety Code provides that “[a] proceeding 

under Subchapter C or E must be held in the statutory or constitutional county court that has the 

jurisdiction of a probate court in mental illness matters.” TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 

5 574.008(a) (Vernon 2003). Thus, in Kerr County proceedings for court-ordered mental health 

services may be heard by either the constitutional county court or the county court at law. 

You also ask whether the Kerr County constitutional county court is required to hear 

proceedings involving patients from other counties. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 3. Whether 

the court has jurisdiction and thus a duty to hear a particular matter will depend upon the statutory 

basis for the proceeding. Because an application for court-ordered mental health services may be 

tiled with the county clerk in the county in which the proposed patient resides, is found, or is already 

receiving mental health services by court order or under subchapter A of chapter 573, see TEX. 

HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 3 574.001(b) (Vernon Supp. 2004); see also id. ch. 573, subch. A 

(Vernon 2003 & Supp. 2004), the court may have jurisdiction over and be required to hear a matter 

involving a patient who resides in another county. See generally Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0364 

(2001) (concluding that Howard County may not refuse to conduct a probable cause hearing under 

2This provision states: ‘“lkre shall be established in each county in this State a County Court, which shall be 

a court of record; and there shall be elected in each county, by the qualified voters, a County Judge, who shall be well 

informed in the law of the State; shall be a conservator of the peace, and shall hold his office for four years, and until 

his SUCC~SSOI shall be elected and qualified. He shall receive as compensation for his services such fees and perquisites 

as may be prescribed by law.” TEX. CONST. art. V, 5 15. 

‘See nlm TEX. PROB. CODEANN. 5 S(c) (Vemon Supp. 2004) (“In those counties inwhich there is no statutory 

probate court, but in which there is a county court at law or other statutory court exercising the jurisdiction of a probate 

court, all applications, petitions, and motions regarding probate and administrations shall be filed and heard in those 

courts and the constihrtional county court, unless otherwise provided by law.“). 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 4 (GA-0244) 

section 574.025 of the Health and Safety Code if an application for court-ordered mental health 

services is pending in the appropriate Howard County court). 

You are concerned about the court’s duties with respect to hearing matters involving patients 

receiving mental health services in Kerr County whose treatment was initiated in another county and 

who are receiving services pursuant to the order of a court in another county. Generally, chapter 574, 

subchapter E provides that requests to modify commitment orders are tiled with the court that 

entered the commitment order. See, e.g., TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. @ 574.061(a) 

(Vernon 2003) (“The facility administrator of a facility to which a patient is committed for inpatient 

mental health services may request the court that entered the commitment order to modify the order 

to require the patient to participate in outpatient mental health services.“), 574.062(a) (“The court 

that entered an order directing a patient to participate in outpatient mental health services may set 

a hearing to determine if the order should be modified in a way that is a substantial deviation from 

the original program of treatment incorporated in the court’s order.“). However, section 574.008(c) 

of the Health and Safety Code permits a court in the county where a patient is receiving temporary 

inpatient services to hear a request for extended inpatient services: 

If a patient is receiving temporary inpatient mental health 

services in a county other than the county that initiated the 

court-ordered inpatient mental health services and the patient requires 

extended inpatient mental health services, the county in which the 

proceedings originated shall pay the expenses of transporting the 

patient back to the county for the hearing unless the court that entered 

the temporary order arranges with the appropriate court in the 

county in which the patient is receiving services to hold the hearing 

on court-ordered extended inpatient mental health services before the 

original order expires. 

Id. 5 574.008(c) (emphasis added). By its plain terms, section 574.008(c) does not require a court 

in the county where the patient is receiving services to hold the hearing. See id.4 

Finally, subchapter G of chapter 574 permits a physician who is treating a patient to “tile an 

application in a probate court or a court with probate jurisdiction for an order to authorize the 

administration of a psychoactive medication regardless of the patient’s refusal.” Zd. 5 574.104(a); 

see also id. 4 574.104(c) (“An application filed under this section is separate from an application for 

court-ordered mental health services.“). Section 574.104(d) requires a court to hear a subchapter G 

application transferred from another county if the patient has been transferred to a mental health 

facility in the court’s county. See id. 3 574.104(d) (“If the hearing is not held on the same day as the 

application for court-ordered mental health services under Section 574.034 or 574.035 and the 

patient is transferred to a mental health facility in another county, the court may transfer the 

‘See also Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JCL0364 (2001) at 11 (“[Wlith respect to a patient receiving temporary 

inpatient mental-health services in Howard County under order by another county’s court, Howard County Courts have 

no jurisdiction to conduct a ninety-day hearing under section 574.034 or a hearing on a motion for extended care under 

section 574.035 unless the appropriate Howard County court has arranged to hold the hearing.“). 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 5 (GA-0244) 

application for an order to authorize psychoactive medication to the county where the patient has 

been transferred.“).’ In sum, the Kerr County constitutional county court or the county court at law 

is required to hear a matter involving a patient receiving mental health services in Kerr County 

whose treatment was initiated in another county and who is receiving services pursuant to the order 

of a court in another county only in certain circumstances. 

You ask whether hearings for court-ordered mental health services must be held at the 

Kerrville State Hospital. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 3. Section 574.03 1 (a)-@) of the Health 

and Safety Code provides as follows: 

(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), the judge may hold 

a hearing on an application for court-ordered mental health services 

at any suitable location in the county. The hearing should be held in 

a physical setting that is not likely to have a harmfbl effect on the 

proposed patient. 

(b) On the request of the proposed patient or the proposed 

patient’s attorney the hearing on the application shall be held in the 

county courthouse. 

TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 5 574.031(a)-(b) (V emon 2003); see also id. $5 574.061(d) 

(requiring that hearing onrequest to modify inpatient service commitment order to require the patient 

to participate in outpatient mental health services shall be held “as prescribed by Section 574.0319, 

574.062(c) (hearing to modify outpatient service commitment order “shall be held before the court, 

without a jury, and as prescribed by Section 574.03 1”). In addition, section 574.03 1 (h)-(i) provides 

for payment of expenses and a salary supplement to a judge who holds hearings in hospitals or 

locations other than the county courthouse. See id. 9 574.031(h)-(i). These provisions permit but 

do not require a court to hold a hearing at a state hospital or other location outside the county 

courthouse. 

B. The Section 574.031(i) Salary Supplement 

1. Statutov Provisions 

Your remaining questions involve the salary supplement authorized by section 

574.031 of the Health and Safety Code. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 3. Section 574.031 

establishes general guidelines for proceedings for court-ordered mental health services. Subsections 

(h) and (i) provide for the expenses and a salary supplement for a judge who holds hearings outside 

the county courthouse: 

JSee also id. at 14 (concluding that, with respect to a hearing on a physician’s application to administer 

psychoactive medication to a patient transferred to Big Spring State Hospital from another county, Howard County may 

not refuse to conduct the hearing if the application was transferred to a Howard County court). 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 6 (GA-0244) 

(h) A judge who holds a hearing under this section in 

hospitals or locations other than the county courthouse is entitled to 

be reimbursed for the judge’s reasonable and necessary expenses 

related to holding a hearing at that location. The judge shall furnish 

the presiding judge of the statutory probate courts or the presiding 

judge of the administrative region, as appropriate, an accounting of 

the expenses for certification. The presiding judge shall provide a 

certification of expenses approved to the countyjudge responsible for 

payment of costs under Section 571.018. 

(i) A judge who holds hearings at locations other than the 

county courthouse also may receive a reasonable salary supplement 

in an amount set by the commissioners court. 

TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 574.031(h)-(i) (Vernon 2003). 

In addition, subsections (i) and (k) permit ajudge who holds a hearing to assess as court costs 

fees for the judge’s and prosecutor’s services: 

(i) Notwithstanding other law, a judge who holds a hearing 

under this section may assess for the judge’s services a fee in an 

amount not to exceed $50 as a court cost against the county 

responsible for the payment of the costs of the hearing under Section 

571.018. 

(k) Notwithstanding other law, a judge who holds a hearing 

under this section may assess for the services of a prosecuting 

attorney a fee in an amount not to exceed $50 as a court cost against 

the county responsible for the payment of the costs of the hearing 

under Section 571.018. For a mental health proceeding, the fee 

assessed under this subsection includes costs incurred for the 

preparation of documents related to the proceeding. The court may 

award as court costs fees for other costs of a mental health proceeding 

against the county responsible for the payment of the costs of the 

hearing under Section 571.018. 

Id. 3 574.031(j)-(k).6 The fees for the judge’s and attorney’s services are not contingent on the 

hearing’s location. See id.; see also Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0364 (2001) at 7 (noting that 

section 574.03 1 (k) fees do not supplement prosecutor salaries and must be deposited with the county 

treasurer according to section 113.021 ofthe Local Government Code); Tex. Att’y Gen. LO-98-053, 

at l-2 (same). 

6Aclerkofa statutory countycourf stahaxyprobatecourt, orcounty cowtis expresslyrequtiedto collectthese 

two fees. .SeeT~x. GOV’TCODEANN. $5 101.081(9)-(lo), 101.101(5)-(6), 101.121(7)-(8) (Vernon Supp. 2004). 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 7 (GA-0244) 

2. Threshold Question: Whether thestatutes Authorizea Commissioners Court 

to Set a Sala y Supplement Fee as a Court Cost 

Your questions involve a fee set by the Kerr County Commissioners Court 

under section 574.031(i), which is charged as a court cost. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2. 

As a threshold matter, we must decide whether the statutes authorize a commissioners court to set 

such a court cost. Unlike subsections (j) and (k) of section 571.03 1, subsection (i) does not state that 

the salary supplement is a court cost. Read solely in the context of section 574.031, it is not clear 

whether subsection (i) authorizes a commissioners court to set a salary supplement as a court cost 

or, alternatively, merely to pay a salary supplement to a judge who holds hearings away from the 

county courthouse. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 5 574.031 (i) (Vernon 2003) (“A judge 

who holds hearings at locations other than the county courthouse also may receive a reasonable 

salary supplement in an amount set by the commissioners court.“). In addition, it is not clear 

whether the commissioners court referred to in section 574.03 l(i) is the commissioners court of the 

county where the hearing is held (and that pays the judge’s salary) or the commissioners court ofthe 

county responsible for paying costs of a hearing under section 571.018. See id. 

We must construe section 574.031(i) in the context of the Texas Mental Health Code’s 

general cost provisions. See Texas Workers’ Compensation Ins. Fund v. Del Zndus., Inc., 35 S.W.3d 

591,593 (Tex. 2000) (a statutory provision is not to be construed in isolation but must be considered 

in the context of the entire statutory scheme). Section 571.018, which generally governs costs for 

proceedings under the Texas Mental Health Code and establishes which county is responsible for 

the costs of a hearing, provides that “[closts under this section include costs and salary 

supplements authorized under Sections 574.031(i) and (j).” TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 

$571.018(c)(5) (Vemon2003)’ Readinconjunctionwith section 571.018(c)(5), section574,031(i) 

provides the basis for a court cost, authorizing but not requiring a commissioners court of a county 

where a hearing is held to establish a salary supplement court cost.’ 

3. Questions about the Kerr County Salary Supplement Court Cost’s 

Disposition 

‘By contrast, section 571.018(c) does not list the expenses authorized by section 574.03101) as court costs. See 

TEX.HEALTH&SAFE~CODEANN. ~571.018(~)(Vemon2003). Presumably, a judge whoholds ahearingatalocation 

other than the county courthouse receives reimbursement for the judge’s reasonable and necessary expenses from the 

responsible county other than as court costs. See id. 5 574.031(h) (providing for the hearing judge to “furnish the 

presiding judge of the statutory probate courts or the presiding judge of the administrative region, as appropriate, an 

accounting of the expenses for certification. The presiding judge shall provide a certification of expenses approved to 

the county judge responsible for payment of costs under Section 571.018.“); see also id. 5 571.018(g) (“A judge who 

holds hearings at locations other than the county courthouse is entitled to additional compensation as provided by 

Sections 574.03 l(h) and (i).“). 

‘In 1997, a bill amending section 574.031(i) would have provided that the commissioners court ofthe county 

responsible for the cysts of the hearing under section 571.018(a) sets the salary supplement and pays it directly to the 

judge. This language didnotappearinthe enrolledversionofthe bill. CompareTex. H.B. 591,75thLeg., R.S. (1997) 

(Senate Comm. Report) with id. (Enrolled version). 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 8 (GA-0244) 

With respect to these provisions, you first ask whether the Kerr County $10 

“judicial salary supplement fee” must be paid to the judge who conducts mental health commitment 

hearings: 

Because Kerr County has adopted a salary supplement under 

the provisions of 4 574.031(i) and such mental health hearings are 

held at locations other than the county courthouse, must the salary 

supplement as imposed be paid to the judge holding such hearings at 

locations other than the county courthouse as directed by 5 

571.018(g), or may the county withhold payment of such funds to 

such judge? 

Request Letter, supra note 1, at 3. 

By the statutes’ plain terms, when the commissioners court has established a salary 

supplement court cost under sections 571.018(c)(5) and 574.031(i), the only authorized purpose of 

the court cost is to pay a salary supplement to a judge who holds hearings at locations other than the 

county courthouse. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. $5 571.018(c)(5) (Vernon 2003) 

(listing salary supplement as a court cost), 574.031(i) (“A judge who holds hearings at locations 

other than the county courthouse also may receive a reasonable salary supplement in an amount set 

by the commissioners court.“) (emphasis added). Moreover, section 571.018(g) expressly provides 

that “[a] judge who holds hearings at locations other than the county courthouse is entitled to 

additional compensation as provided by Sections 574.031(h) and (i).” Id. § 571.018(g) (emphasis 

added). The Code Construction Act provides that the phrase “‘is entitled to’ creates or recognizes 

a right.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 3 11.016(4) (Vernon 1998) (“The following constructions apply 

unless the context in which the word or phrase appears necessarily requires a different construction 

or unless a different construction is expressly provided by statute . . .“). Accordingly, salary 

supplement court costs collected by Kerr County must be used to pay a salary supplement as 

provided by section 574.03 1 (i). 

You also ask about the county’s authority to reduce the judge’s salary by the amount of the 

salary supplement: 

If the county is required to pay such salary supplement to the 

judge and further because $ 574.031(i) provides that the same is a 

“supplement” and $571.018(g) provides that the judge is entitled to 

the same as “additional compensation,” is it proper for the 

Commissioners Court to reduce or offset the judge’s salary in an 

amount equal to such salary supplement as a condition of approving 

the payment of such salary supplement? 

Request Letter, supra note 1, at 3. Your letter indicates that the salary reduction or offset was an 

express component of the countyjudge’s annual salary in the officially adopted county budget. See 

id. at 2 (stating that the commissioners court “approved payment of. [the] salary supplement to 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 9 (GA-0244) 

the judge in the budget; however, such approval was on the express condition that the judge’s salary 

to be paid by Kerr County should be reduced by an amount equal to such approved salary supplement 

in the County Court budget, and reduced the judge’s salary accordingly”). 

Section 571.018(g) of the Health and Safety Code directs that a judge who holds a hearing 

at locations other than the county courthouse is entitled to receive a salary supplement as additional 

compensation “as provided by” section 574.031(i). See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. 

5 571.018(g) (Vernon 2003). Therefore, when a commissioners court has set a salary supplement 

court cost under sections 571.018(c)(5) and 574.031(i), see id. $5 571.018(c)(5), 574.031(i), the 

court cost must be used to fknd a salary supplement. See supra pp. 7-8. However, these Health and 

Safety Code provisions are silent with respect to whether a commissioners court, in setting the 

county judge’s annual salary under the Local Government Code, may condition the judge’s receipt 

of the salary supplement on a salary reduction equal in amount to the salary supplement. We 

construe the Health and Safety Code provisions to prohibit a commissioners court fkom doing so, 

for three reasons. 

First, such a salary reduction would be tantamount to the commissioners court directing that 

the county retain and expend for general county purposes amounts collected as salary supplement 

court costs. Because these statutes do not authorize a county that has established a salary supplement 

court cost to use such costs for any purpose other than to pay a salary supplement, the statutes must 

beconstrued to prohibit such asalaryreduction. S~~TEX.GOV’TCODEANN. $5 311.021(3) (Vernon 

1998) (in enacting a statute, it is presumed that a just and reasonable result is intended), 3 11.023 (“In 

construing a statute, . a court may consider among other matters the object sought to be 

attained” and the “consequences of a particular construction[.]“). 

Second, the legislature provided in section 574.031(h) and (i) for the expenses and to 

supplement the salary of a judge who holds hearings outside the county courthouse, creating an 

incentive for judges to do so. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. $574.031(h)-(i) (Vernon 

2003). Construing the statutes to permit a salary offset would defeat that purpose. 

Finally, the section 574.03 l(j) “judge’s services fee,” which is not contingent on the hearing 

location, appears to be intended. to reimburse a county for the cost of providing its judge’s services 

to other counties. See id. $ 574.031(j) (‘Notwithstanding other law, a judge who holds a hearing 

under this section may assess for the judge’s services a fee in an amount not to exceed $50 as a court 

cost against the county responsible fork the payment of the costs of the hearing under Section 

571.018.“).9 If the statutes were construed to permit a county to offset the judge’s annual salary in 

%e also TEX. CONS. art. XVI, $61 (providing that county officers must be compensated on a salary basis); 

TEX. Lot. GOV’T CODE ANN. $5 154.002 (Vernon 1999) (“A district, county, or precinct officer who is paid on a salary 

basis receives the salary instead of all fees, commissions, and other compensation the off%xr would otherwise be 

authorized to keep, except as otherwise provided by this subchapter.“), 154.003 (“A district, county, or precinct cd&a 

who is paid an annual salary shall charge and collect in the manner authorized by law all fees, commissions, and other 

compensation permitted for official services performed by the officer. The officer shall dispose of the collected money 

as provided by Subchapter B, Chapter 113.“). Cf: Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0364 (2001) at 7 (Health and Safety Code 

(continued...) 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 10 (GA-0244) 

an amount equal to the salary supplement, the county would be permitted, in practical effect, to retain 

salary supplement fees in addition to judge’s services fees. This would convert the salary 

supplement fee, an incentive for the judge to hold the hearing outside the county courthouse, into 

a second fee to reimburse the county for its judge’s services. The statutes must be construed to avoid 

authorizing a responsible county to be charged duplicative fees. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 

$3 311.021(3) (Vernon 1998) (in enacting a statute, it is presumed that a just and reasonable result 

is intended), 3 11.023 (“In construing a statute, a court may consider among other matters the 

. . object sought to be attained” and the “consequences of a particular construction[.]“); see also 

Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0364 (2001) at 7 (concluding that county may not charge separately for 

costs intended to be encompassed within prosecutor’s fees: “The costs that the prosecutor’s office 

incurs in preparing documents necessary to conduct these hearings are encompassed within the 

phrase ‘prosecutor’s fees.’ Section 574.03 1 (k) plainly limits the fee for a prosecuting attorney to ‘an 

amount not to exceed $50.“‘). 

We note that a commissioners court sets the county judge’s annual salary pursuant to chapter 

152, subchapter B of the Local Government Code in conjunction with adopting the annual county 

budget. S~~TEX.LOC.GOV’TCODEANN. $4 152.011, ,013 (Vernon 1999);seealsoid. $5 152.014- 

,016 (salary grievance procedure), 152.017 (excepted positions); Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. MW-110 

(1979) at 2 (concluding that a countyjudge’s salary was set pursuant to the statutory predecessor to 

Local Government Code, chapter 152, subchapter B). Once the salary is set, the commissioners 

court may not change it until the court adopts the next annual budget. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. 

GA-0162 (2004) at 2. While section 152.012 prohibits a commissioners court from setting an 

officer’s or employee’s salary below the amount in effect for the position as of a certain date, chapter 

152, subchapter B does not preclude a commissioners court from setting the county judge’s annual 

salary at an amount less than the judge’s salary for the prior year. 

Thus, while a commissioners court may not offset a county judge’s annual salary by the 

amount of a Mental Health Code salary supplement, the fact that a county judge is entitled to receive 

a salary supplement under the Mental Health Code does not forever immunize the county judge from 

a salary reduction. A commissioners court may reduce the county judge’s annual salary under 

chapter 152, subchapter B of the Local Government Code, but the salary reduction may not be 

related to salary supplements the commissioners court expects the judge to receive. For example, 

the Mental Health Code provisions would not preclude a commissioners court t?om reducing the 

county judge’s salary in connection with across-the-board salary reductions. 

section 574.03 1 (k) fees do not supplement prosecutor salaries and must be deposited with the county treasurer according 

to section 113.021 of the Local Government Code). 
The Honorable David M. Motley - Page 11 (GA-0244) 

SUMMARY 

The Kerr County constitutional county court and county court 

at law have concurrent jurisdiction over proceedings under the Texas 

Mental Health Code. Because an application for court-ordered 

mental health services may be filed with the county clerk in the 

county in which the proposed patient resides, is found, or is already 

receiving mental health services by court order or under subchapter 

A of chapter 573, a court may have jurisdiction over and be required 

to hear a matter involving a patient who resides in another county. 

The Texas Mental Health Code does not generally require a court in 

a county where a state hospital is located to hear matters involving 

patients who are receiving services at the hospital pursuant to the 

order of a court in another county. The Texas Mental Health Code 

permits but does not require a court to hold a proceeding for courtordered mental health services at the state hospital in the county or 

other location outside the county courthouse. 

Sections 571,018(c)(5) and 574.031(i) of the Health and 

Safety Code authorize a commissioners court to set a court cost to pay 

a salary supplement to a judge who holds hearings at locations other 

than the county courthouse. Section 571.018(g) directs that a judge 

who holds hearings at locations other than the county courthouse is 

entitled to receive a salary supplement as provided by section 

574.031(i) as additional compensation. A commissioners court that 

has set a salary supplement court cost may not withhold the salary 

supplement from a judge who holds hearings at locations other than 

the county courthouse or reduce the judge’s salary in an amount equal 

to the salary supplement. 

Very truly yours, 

&AB* 

Attorney General of Texas 

BARRY R. MCBEE 

First Assistant Attorney General 

DON R. WILLETT 

Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel 

NANCY S. FULLER 

Chair, Opinion Committee 

Mary R. Crouter 

Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee