alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule cotnains summary financial information extracted from JMC Group,
Inc.'s 1995 Third Quarter 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such 10Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000746425
<NAME> JMC GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                            2517
<SECURITIES>                                       700
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4811
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9111
<PP&E>                                            2050
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3432
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            62
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        7115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10609
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17429
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 14221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3208
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1291
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

Ref. Docket No. 2410

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

STATE OF NEW YORK )

) ss.:

COUNTY OF NEW YORK )

WING CHAN, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. I am employed as a Noticing Coordinator by Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC, located at 

777 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10017. I am over the age of eighteen years and 

am not a party to the above-captioned action.

2. I caused to be served the “Statement Regarding Reimbursement of Monthly Expenses of 

Members of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors,” dated June 5, 2019 [Docket 

No. 2410], by causing true and correct copies to be:

a. enclosed securely in separate postage prepaid envelopes and delivered via overnight

mail to those parties listed on the annexed Exhibit A, on June 5, 2019, and

b. delivered via messenger to the following party: U.S. Bankruptcy Court Northern 

District of CA, Attn: Honorable Dennis Montali, Chambers Copy, 450 Golden Gate 

Ave, 18th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102, on June 6, 2019.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2931 Filed: 07/11/19 Entered: 07/11/19 14:58:57 Page 1 of

4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. All envelopes utilized in the service of the foregoing contained the following legend: 

“LEGAL DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED. PLEASE DIRECT TO THE ATTENTION OF 

ADDRESSEE, PRESIDENT OR LEGAL DEPARTMENT.”

/s/ Wing Chan

Wing Chan

Sworn to before me this 

6

th day of June, 2019

/s/ Cassandra Murray

Notary Public, State of New York

No. 01MU6220179

Qualified in Queens County

Commission Expires April 12, 2022

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2931 Filed: 07/11/19 Entered: 07/11/19 14:58:57 Page 2 of

4
EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2931 Filed: 07/11/19 Entered: 07/11/19 14:58:57 Page 3 of

4
Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Attn: Janet Loduca, Esq.

77 Beale Street

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Esq. and Rachael Foust, Esq

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10153

Keller & Benvenutti LLP

Attn: Tobias S. Keller, Esq. and Jane Kim, Esq.

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Attn: Kristopher M. Hansen, Esq., Erez E. Gilad, Esq., and

Matthew G. Garofalo, Esq.

180 Maiden Lane

New York, NY 10038-4982

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

Attn: Frank A. Merola, Esq.

2029 Century Park East

Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086

The Office of the United States Trustee for Region 17

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq. and Timothy Laffredi, Esq.

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor

Suite #05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2931 Filed: 07/11/19 Entered: 07/11/19 14:58:57 Page 4 of

4
J

- S01001

- 19

______ ______________________________ * Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

LYN A. FRY

Appellant

v.

JOHN E. QUINLAN

--------------------

---- JOHN E. QUINLAN

v.

LYN A. FRY

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1325 MDA 2018

Appeal from the Judgment Entered July 25, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County Civil Division at No(s):

17

- 1244,

17

- 1245

BEFORE: PANELLA, P.J., MURRAY, J., and PELLEGRINI*, J.

DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY PELLEGRINI, J.: FILED JUNE 17, 2019

I would not quash the appeal for reasons set forth in my dissenting

opinion in Matter of M.P.

, 204 A.3d 976 (Pa. Super. 2019). For those

reasons , I would hold that the requirement in Commonwealth v. Walker

,

185 A.3d 969, 971 (Pa. 2018)

, that holds that separate notices of appeal be

filed for each case sought to be appeal ed, only becomes effective when the

Appellate Procedural Rules Committee compli es the direction given to it by our

Supreme Court to either amend Pa.R.A

. P. 341(a) or its Official Note toJ

- S01001

- 19

- 2

-

explicitly require separate notices of appeal. Accordingly, I respectfully

dissent.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dennis F. Dunne (admitted pro hac vice) 

Samuel A. Khalil (admitted pro hac vice) 

MILBANK LLP 

55 Hudson Yards 

New York, New York 10001-2163 

Telephone: (212) 530-5000 

Facsimile: (212) 530-5219 

and 

Gregory A. Bray (SBN 115367) 

Thomas R. Kreller (SBN 161922) 

MILBANK LLP 

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (424) 386-4000 

Facsimile: (213) 629-5063 

Counsel for the Official Committee 

of Unsecured Creditors

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

 - and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

STATEMENT OF THE OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED 

CREDITORS IN SUPPORT OF THE 

DEBTORS’ MOTION PURSUANT TO 11 

U.S.C §§ 105(a) AND 363 FOR AN 

ORDER AUTHORIZING DEBTORS TO 

PARTIPATE IN AB-1045 WILDFIRE 

FUND

Date: August 28, 2019 

Time: 9:30 a.m. (Pacific Time) 

Place: United States Bankruptcy Court 

 Courtroom 17, 16th Floor 

 450 Golden Gate Avenue 

 San Francisco, CA 94102 

Re: Docket No. 3444 

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3636 Filed: 08/21/19 Entered: 08/21/19 12:04:28 Page 1 of

2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

44553.00001

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Official Committee”) respectfully 

submits this statement in support of the Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 11 U.S.C §§ 105(a) and 363 

for an Order Authorizing Debtors to Participate in AB-1054 Wildfire Fund (the “Wildfire Fund 

Motion”) [Docket No. 3444].1 

STATEMENT 

The Official Committee believes that the Debtors’ participation in the Go-Forward 

Wildfire Fund will enhance their prospects for a successful reorganization and improve recoveries 

for all creditors in these cases, including wildfire victims. As such, the Official Committee 

supports the relief requested by the Debtors and respectfully requests the Court grant the Wildfire 

Fund Motion. 

Dated: August 21, 2019 

MILBANK LLP 

/s/Gregory A. Bray . 

DENNIS F. DUNNE 

SAMUEL A. KHALIL 

GREGORY A. BRAY 

THOMAS R. KRELLER 

Counsel for the Official Committee of 

Unsecured Creditors 

 

1

 Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Wildfire Fund 

Motion. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3636 Filed: 08/21/19 Entered: 08/21/19 12:04:28 Page 2 of

2
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00069

- CV

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

, Appellant

v.

KELLIE MCDOUGALD

, Appellee

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for rehearing of the July 16, 2015 order striking appellant’s

brief is denied.*

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed August 6, 2015

* The Court notes that much of the duplication and service cost which appellant

asserts will be lost could be avoided if appellant filed and served his brief electronically

as the Court has previously notified appellant was an option; an option appellant chose

not to use.
Certification 
Pursuant to Section 906 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), we, Francis Zubrowski, CEO, and Francis Zubrowski, President & Chief Financial Officer of All State Properties Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to the best of our knowledge, that:

| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                             

Dated: February 14, 2011



|/s/ Francis Zubrowski                               |  | /s/ Francis Zubrowski                                                                                                 
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Francis Zubrowski
CEO
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | Francis Zubrowski 
President & Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 23.1

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTING FIRM


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No.  333-18829),  Form S-8 (No.  333-20403) and Form S-8
(No.  333-61392) of Titanium  Metals  Corporation of our reports dated March 24,
2006  relating  to  the  financial  statements,  financial  statement  schedule,
management's  assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the  effectiveness of internal  control over financial  reporting,
which appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------------
Denver, Colorado
March 24, 2006
## NO. 12

- 1 1

- 00 372

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IWS GAS AND SUPPLY OF TEXAS § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

LTD., SHAWN TINDALL, MICHAEL

GEORGE AND JOHN ROGSTAD,

APPELLANTS

§ JU DICIAL DISTRICT COURT

V.

MATHESON TRI

- GAS, INC.,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellants and Appellee have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In their motion,

the parties state that they have agreed to settle and resolve all issues concerning this matter and

appeal and therefore jointly move to dismiss the appeal. Because the parties have met the

requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted , and the

appeal, whic h is associated with the notices of appeal filed on November 17, 2011, and March 8,

2012, respectively, is dismissed with prejudice to refiling.

Opinion delivered June 29, 2012.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 29, 2012

NO. 12

- 11

- 00372

- C V

IWS GAS AND SUPPLY OF TEXAS, LTD.

SHAWN TINDALL, MICHAEL GEORGE AND JOHN ROGSTAD

, Appellants

V.

MATHESON TRI

- GAS, INC.

, Appellee

____________________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the 7th Judicial District Court

of Smith County, Texas. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011

- 3048

- A )

__________________________________________________________________________

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the joint motion of the Appellant s and

Appellee to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion is granted and th is appeal be

dismissed with prejudice ; all costs of this appeal are assessed against the party incurring same;

for which let execution issue; and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
#### Ellen C. Osborn, Respondent, v. Howard J. M. Cardeza and Others, Appellants.

Motion for ■ reargument denied, with' ten dollars costs.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1998 MASCOTECH, INC. 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          76,740
<SECURITIES>                                    18,630
<RECEIVABLES>                                  241,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    177,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               560,140
<PP&E>                                         987,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (270,620)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,101,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,670
<BONDS>                                      1,392,310
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,330
<OTHER-SE>                                     195,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,101,470
<SALES>                                        400,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               400,760
<CGS>                                          296,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,740
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, Dennis P. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of Fusion-io, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Fusion-io, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 2, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ DENNIS P. WOLF     
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Dennis P. Wolf         
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
A r a 1

r, " • aa a r . . •

t 

### I! M, x . s 

### TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC μ d4 3udgment 

## Rendered - MAY 19 2023 ON EL FROM 

### THE 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CURT, DIVISION ASSUMPTION PARISH, LOUISIANA DOCKET NUMBER 4,

Leopold Z. Sher James M. Garner Peter L. Hilbert, Jr.

Christopher aa ..; T. a New Orleans., rTravis J. Turner Gonzales, Louisiana 

### a Roy ' a et ai Kent A. Lambert Adam B. Zuckerman

# Leopoldo

AdamsMatthew C. Juneau Lauren 

### Brink New Orleans., Louisiana a a::! i

### Letm

### This dispute is one of many arising out of the August 3, 2012 sinkhole that

I p I I lIill I I III I I 111 I I I M I III 1: 1121 RUE WSTIZM- 1 111111111,1`1 Mill to the trial court. 

### by the same trial court, on the same day, but in a different docket number, i. e.,Twenty - I " 111111 111 111 1 , 11 C'lglp 0 1 1111; 1111111: 111112 P1111111 FIRINIRII: ' I Is! 1311111. laiIiiiiiiiii Irn 11; Illirll I- . Ili I III " I 1111HEI HIM ! 71111 0511 fl if ! IIII Ill ; I1111111 I' ll IRII - I - 0. 

## 481n.[ MZ3 w= 111pi 

### f! riligrllpIlilill a 1 S 

### M Kmzil lit 41 appealable judgment under La. C.C.P. art. 1915( B) and R.J. Messinger, Inc. v. I In 

### After a thorough review ofthe record, we find no material distinction between the

1111111 1II I I I I I I 

### 1111 p

### II IlipI I p Ili II art. 1915(B) and Messinger 

### Therefore, we lack subject matter jurisdiction over this 

### I After Crosstex0832was decided, this court decided Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC,22- 1036 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 4/ 18/23), 5o.3d , 2023 WL 2985097 ( Florida Gas 1036), 

### and again considered another identical judgment by the same trial court, on the same day, in a third trial court docket number, i.e.,Twenty - Third JDC Docket No. 34,316. As did the CrosstexO832Court before it, the Florida Gas 1036 Court dismissed Texas Brine's appeal. 2proceedings. 

### We issue this summary disposition in accordance with Uniform Rules — ii I 51, 1171F j-- jq, 11 11 1171 k FIT! 0 0



### 2 In light ofthis opinion and the parties' appearance at oral argument, we deny as mootTexas Brine's February 8, 2023 Motion to Remand Issues Presented by this Appeal and Cancel Oral Argument Due to Improvident Granting ofArticle 1915(B) Certification, that was filed with this Court. 9
Transaction Type by Project

Summary of Expenditures by Project and Type

PG&E Corporation, et al. (Case No. 19-30088 (DM))

For the Period January 29, 2019 through February 28, 2019

Total 

Expenditures

Exhibit F

PwC LLP - Management, Tax and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors

Fixed Fee Services

North Bay & Camp Fire Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-C; 01-D

Airfare $32,015.61

Lodging $95,451.63

Meals $14,704.19

Parking $100.00

Public/Ground Transportation $17,037.73

Sundry - Other $250.00

Expense Reduction ($18,734.16)

Subtotal - Expenditures Sought for North Bay & Camp Fire Services $140,825.00

Subtotal - Expenditures Sought for Fixed Fee Services $140,825.00

Hourly Services

E-Discovery Services Retention Exhibit #: 01-K

Lodging $534.41

Meals $236.67

Public/Ground Transportation $198.80

Rental Car $789.78

Subtotal - Expenditures Sought for E-Discovery Services $1,759.66

Strategic Analysis Services Retention Exhibit #: 03

Airfare $25,678.33

Lodging $86,656.81

Meals $13,835.74

Parking $577.46

Public/Ground Transportation $13,415.33

Subtotal - Expenditures Sought for Strategic Analysis Services $140,163.67

Subtotal - Expenditures Sought for Hourly Services $141,923.33

Total - Expenditures Sought for Reimbursement $282,748.33

Friday, June 28, 2019

Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2802-6 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 13:40:27 Page 1

of 1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 292 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 10:39:12 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 292 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 10:39:12 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 292 Filed: 02/05/19 Entered: 02/05/19 10:39:12 Page 3 of 3