alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5015 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5015

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 provide that grants awarded pursuant to part Q of title I of that Act 
may be used to hire veterans and other individuals as employees of law 
enforcement agencies for positions that do not require sworn authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2014

   Ms. Bass introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 provide that grants awarded pursuant to part Q of title I of that Act 
may be used to hire veterans and other individuals as employees of law 
enforcement agencies for positions that do not require sworn authority.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Help Employ and Recruit Our 
Excellent Servicemembers Grant Act of 2014'' or the ``HEROES Grant Act 
of 2014''.

SEC. 2. USE OF COPS GRANTS TO HIRE VETERANS AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 1701(b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796dd(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (16), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (17) as paragraph (18);
            (3) in paragraph (18), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``(1) through (16)'' and inserting ``(1) through (17)''; and
            (4) by inserting after paragraph (16) the following:
            ``(17) to hire veterans (as such term is defined in section 
        101 of title 38, United States Code) and other individuals as 
        employees of law enforcement agencies for positions that do not 
        require sworn authority; and''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000746262
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,066,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,066,386
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,066,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     992,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,066,386
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,406
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,474)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (75,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (75,474)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.40)
        

</TABLE>
CORRECTED MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

 

TO THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, on September 24, 2009 

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

HEYWOOD JOSEPH SHOLARS, 

APPELLANT

NO. 01-08-00060-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Appeal from the 208th District Court of 

Harris County, Texas. (Tr. Ct. No. 

1034539). Panel consists of Justices 

Keyes, Hanks, and Bland. Opinion 

delivered by Justice Keyes.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

AThe cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the 

court below on January 16, 2008. After submitting the cause and inspecting the record of 

the court below, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no reversible error in the 

judgment. It is, therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the 

judgment of the court below be in all things affirmed.

It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Justices Keyes, Hanks, and Bland.@
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

November 24, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-2065
THEODORE JUSTICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ART POPE, in his individual and official capacity; JACK S. HOLMES, in his individual and official capacity; NANCY WELLS, in her individual and official capacity; CARON CROSS, in her individual and official capacity; DAWN STEADMAN, in her individual and official capacity; KRISTEN MCRAY, in her individual and official capacity; BUCK LATTIMORE, in his individual and official capacity; TRACY WEAVER, in her individual and official capacity, and others sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:07-cv-00251-FL) Submitted: January 24, 2008 Decided: February 12, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theodore Justice, Appellant Pro Se.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Theodore Justice appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Justice v. Pope , No. 5:07-cv-00251-FL (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT C 

 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3486-3 Filed: 08/09/19 Entered: 08/09/19 09:01:28 Page 1

of 2
Exhibit C

Expense Summary

For the Period March 20, 2019 to May 31, 2019

Reimbursable Expense Amount

Airfare 8,565.39 $    

Hotel 1,435.82        

Meals 728.19           

Transportation 1,792.18        

Miscellaneous 141.11           

Total Expenses 12,662.69 $  

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3486-3 Filed: 08/09/19 Entered: 08/09/19 09:01:28 Page 2

of 2
32(ii)

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operation of the Company.




/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
-------------------
Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 11, 2008


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2322-2    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 15:16:23    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2322-2    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 15:16:23    Page 2of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel; Research on Integrity in Collaborative 
Research.
    Date: July 15, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Roosevelt, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Barbara J. Nelson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Review, NCRR, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., 1 Democracy Plaza, Room 1080, MSC 4874, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0806.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure; 93.306, 93.333, 93.702, 
ARRA Related Construction Awards; National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: May 24, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-12941 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
RELIEF FROM STAY SUMMARY SHEET

 * * * INSTRUCTIONS ON FORM EDC 3-468-INST * * * COMPLETE ALL PORTIONS APPLICABLE TO THE RELIEF FROM STAY MOTION

THIS IS IN THE NATURE OF A PRETRIAL STATEMENT AND IS NOT EVIDENCE.

DEBTOR: _________________________________ CASE NO. __________________

MOVANT: _________________________________ DC NO. ____________________

HEARING DATE/TIME: ___________________________________________________

RELIEF IS SOUGHT AS TO:

( ) REAL PROPERTY Assessor Parcel Number (APN):

( ) PERSONAL PROPERTY If applicable, Vehicle Identification Number (VIN): 

( ) STATE COURT LITIGATION

1. Address OR description of property or state court action:

2. Movant's trust deed is a ( ) 1st ( ) 2nd ( ) 3rd ( ) Other:

OR

Leased property is ( ) Residential ( ) Non-residential Term: ( ) Month-to-Month ( ) Other

3. Verified appraisal filed? _______ Movant's valuation of property: $______________

4. The following amounts are presently owing to movant for:

 PRINCIPAL INTEREST COSTS TOTAL

$ $ $ $

5. State identity, rank, and balance owing to other known lien holders. Use additional pageV if necessary.

$

$ 

$ 

 TOTAL ALL LIENS $

 DEBTOR'S EQUITY $ 

6. Monthly payment is $ , of which $ is for impound account. Monthly late charge is $ .

7. The last payment by debtor was received on __________________ and was applied to the payment due .

8. Number of payments past due and amount: (a) Pre-petition _____ $ ____________ (b) Post-petition ____$ .

9. Notice of Default was recorded on ___________________. Notice of sale was published on___________________________.

10. If a chapter 13 case, in what class is this claim?

11. Grounds for seeking relief (check as applicable):

( ) § 362(d)(1) ( ) § 362(d)(2) ( ) § 362(d)(3) ( ) § 362(d)(4) 

( ) Cause ( ) Inadequate protection ( ) Lack of equity ( ) Lack of insurance ( ) Bad faith

( ) Surrendered pursuant to Statement of Intention. ( ) Report of No Distribution has been filed.

( ) Other __________________________________________________________________________________________.

EDC 3-468 (Rev. Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3039 Filed: 07/17/19 Entered: 07/17/19 15:54:30 Page 1 of 2/18) 1
#### Louis F. Gautier, Respondent, v. Anna P. Ditmar and Others, Appellants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Carr. '
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 

11, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00075-CV

IN RE KIRBY GARDNER, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-61762-7

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On February 8, 2021, relator Kirby Gardener filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus asking this court to compel the Honorable Elaine Palmer, the presiding 

judge of the 215th District Court, to “allow litigating proceedings [in the underlying 

cause] to move forward to its conclusion.” Relator asserts he filed a petition for 

injunctive and declaratory relief on September 30, 2020 and, other than sending a 

letter acknowledging his petition was filed, the trial court has taken no further action 

“that would allow litigation to proceed forward.” 
2

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus omits most of the items required by 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3, including argument and supporting legal 

authority. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(h). The petition does not contain the required 

certification that relator has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual 

statement in it is supported by competent evidence in the appendix or record. Tex. 

R. App. P. 52.3(j). Relator did not file a record with his petition. Tex. R. App. P. 

52.7(a) (relator must file record that includes (1) a certified or sworn copy of every 

document that is material to the relator’s claim and (2) a properly authenticated 

transcript of any relevant testimony from the underlying proceeding). 

We conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to mandamus relief. We deny 

his petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ Kevin Jewell

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Hassan

(Bourliot, J., dissenting without opinion)
#### R. A. HAMILTON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.

(Filed 29 June, 1932.)

(For digest see *Hamilton v. R. R., ante,*136.)

Appeal by defendant, Seaboard Air Line Railway Company from *Small; J.,*at December Term, 1931, of Wake.

*141
      *.Clyde A. Douglass and R. N. Simms for plaintiff.*

*Murray Allen for Seaboard Air Line Railway Company.*

ClarksoNn, J.

For tbe reasons given in the opinion in *Hamilton v. R. R., ante,*136, the judgment of the court below is

Eeversed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50610

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO PENALOZA-TREJO, also known as Mario Penalosa-Trejo

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-2376-ALL

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Penaloza-Trejo raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. UnitedStates v.Pineda-Arrellano, 492F.3d 624,

625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         376,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               455,242
<PP&E>                                      11,015,288
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,334,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,136,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          373,352
<BONDS>                                      5,219,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,542,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,136,294
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,194,823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               929,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             330,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (65,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (65,319)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
32(i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Bradford,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Mark D. Bradford
----------------------------------
Mark D. Bradford
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 8, 2007


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
#### Charles W. Henning and Another, Appellants, v. Seymore Bennett and Another, Respondents.

Judgment and order affirmed,
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2328 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 06/03/19 09:01:12 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2328 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 06/03/19 09:01:12 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2328 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 06/03/19 09:01:12 Page 3 of

3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2020

s0121

Order 

Clerk

January 24, 2020

158856

NICOLA BINNS, JAYNE CARVER, SUSAN

McDONALD, GOAT YARD, LLC, and END

OF THE ROAD MINISTRIES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 158856

COA: 337609

CITY OF DETROIT, CITY OF DETROIT

WATER AND SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT,

DETROIT BOARD OF WATER 

COMMISSIONERS, and GREAT LAKES 

WATER AUTHORITY,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

case of DAART v City of Detroit (Docket No. 158852) is pending on appeal before this 

Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present 

application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE 

pending the decision in that case.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jason Henry Lathe v. Rachel Lizabeth Lathe

Appellate case number: 01-18-00936-CV

Trial court case number: 17-03-0243-CVA

Trial court: County Court of Atascosa County

Appellant, Jason Henry Lathe, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s 

judgment, signed on September 17, 2018. On November 29, 2018, the Clerk of this 

Court notified appellant that the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s 

record had not filed a reporter’s record because appellant had not paid, or made 

arrangements to pay, the fee for preparation of the reporter’s record. On December 31, 

2018, appellant’s counsel notified the Clerk that he had paid the fee “on or about

December 18, 2018.” However, a court reporter’s record has not been filed in this 

appeal. Accordingly, the reporter’s record is due to be filed no later than 30 days of 

the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b), (c).

Appellant has filed a Motion to Suspend Briefing Deadline or the Alternative

Appellant’s Third Motion for Extension. Because the appellate record is not complete, 

appellant’s brief is not yet due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1, 38.6(a). Appellant’s motion, 

therefore, is dismissed as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __May 14, 2019____________________