alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Ernest A. Bates, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Shared Hospital Services;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; andb) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;] andc) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (or the fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.August 12, 2005              /s/ Ernest A. Bates, M.D.   Ernest A. Bates, M.D.      Chief Executive Officer  
15
32(i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Bradford,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Mark D. Bradford
-----------------------------------
Mark D. Bradford
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 6, 2010


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.


                                       41
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7245

ASMAR NAFIS NEWSOME,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

J. RAY ORMOND,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-00249-RGD-LRL)

Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Asmar Nafis Newsome, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Asmar Nafis Newsome, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district 

court’s order. Newsome v. Ormond, No. 2:18-cv-00249-RGD-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 

2019). We deny as unnecessary Newsome’s motion for a certificate of appealability. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2156 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:37:51 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2156 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:37:51 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2156 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:37:51 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2156 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:37:51 Page 4 of

4
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 02

- 00468

- CV

David F. Henges, M.D., Appellant

v.

Texas Workers =

Compensation Commission, Medical Review Division; and Service Lloyds Insurance Company, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 97

- 12800, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE , JUDGE PRESIDING

The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. The portion of the regulatory

provision which this suit sought to challenge has been otherwise eliminated. Therefore, this appeal is moot.

This Court lacks jurisdiction when an appeal is moot. State v. Ruiz Wholesale Co. , 901 S.W.2d 772, 775

(Tex. App. C Austin 1995, no writ).

The joint motion of the parties is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: October 10, 2002Do Not Publish
#### Diane Randell, Respondent, v Woodmere Health Care and Health Related Facility et al., Appellants.

Submitted October 2,1995;

decided December 5, 1995

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see,*CPLR 5513 [b]).
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Statement: U.S. military conducts operation to augment security of the U.S. Embassy in Haiti
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Statement: U.S. military conducts operation to augment security of the U.S. Embassy in Haiti</h1>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2020/Mar/12/2002263994/1920/1080/0/200312-A-BS728-001.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="Official shield of U.S. Southern Command."
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">SOUTHCOM Logo</div>
            <div class="image-caption">Official shield of U.S. Southern Command.</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    <div> <span class="date">/ Published March 10, 2024</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>At the request of the Department of State, the U.S. military conducted an operation to augment the security of the U.S. Embassy at Port-au-Prince, allow our Embassy mission operations to continue, and enable non-essential personnel to depart.</p>

<p>This airlift of personnel into and out of the Embassy is consistent with our standard practice for Embassy security augmentation worldwide, and no Haitians were on board the military aircraft. Our Embassy remains focused on advancing U.S. government efforts to support the Haitian people, including mobilizing support for the Haitian National Police, expediting the deployment of the United Nations-authorized Multinational Security Support (MSS) mission, and accelerating a peaceful transition of power via free and fair elections.</p>

<p>As announced in September 2023, the Department of Defense is postured to provide robust enabling support for the MSS, including planning assistance, information sharing, airlift, communications, and medical support.”</p>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File numbers 333-07205, 333-07207, 333-07211,
333-07213, 333-52295, 333-82131, 333-95401, 333-38144, 333-38142, 333-38140,
333-61628, 333-106021 and 333-106023) and on Form S-3 (File number 333-113178)
of SS&C Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 2004, except as to
Note 14, for which the date is March 5, 2004, relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
March 12, 2004
Tina Reszler 

835 Bille Rd 

Paradise CA. 95969 

Judge Montali, Courtroom 17 

450 Golden Gate Ave 

Mail Box 36099 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Case #19-30088-DM 

Docket #12995 

September 30, 2022 

Please add to the courtroom docket

To: Honorable Judge Montali, 

I am a Campfire Survivor who suffers PTSD and continues to struggle emotionally. My mind and my 

decision-making processes have been greatly affected. Contractors have taken advantaged of me and 

the rebuilding process has been a nightmare. I want PG$E to be held fully accountable and how we do 

that is by ensuring every single wildfire survivor receives their full determination award. 

I am writing in support of docket #12995 MOTION OF WILLIAM B. ABRAMS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL 

RULE OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 2004 FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING DISCOVER AND 

HEARINGS REGARDING DEBTOR ACT, CONDUCT AND AGREEMENTS THAT MAY OBSTRUCT AND 

AGREEMENTS THAT MAY OBSTRUCT OR LIMIT THE JUST AND FAIR MANAGEMENT OF THE FIRE VICTIMS 

TRUST. 

This court continually allows PG&E, the lawyers and FVT administration to manipulate and reap over 

wildfire survivors. The FVT just released a statement about funds from the additional lawsuits to go to 

agencies and NOT wildfire survivors. This is just another example of mass manipulation leading 

survivors to believe in something that was not true. If the intend was to use funds to repay agencies 

why did the court allow Trotter to lead us all to believe it was for survivors in his videos? 

x What hold does PG$E have over this court if they can sway this court against transparency? 

x At what point will this court stand up for true justice and ensure all wildfire survivors receive 

their full determination awards? 

x Anything less than a full determination is equivalent to NOT fully holding PG$E accountable. 

My only “hope”, is that this court does have the best interest of wildfire survivors and isn’t following 

the same paradigm and ideology of PG$E to channel funds for themselves that where earmarked for 

another intended purpose. 

Respectfully, Tina Reszler - Campfire Survivor 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13023 Filed: 09/30/22 Entered: 09/30/22 11:42:39 Page 1

of 1
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5089 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2000 Mulford Road in Mulberry, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class 

Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2014 

Mr. ROSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2000 Mulford Road in Mulberry, Florida, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS DANIEL M. FERGUSON 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 2000 Mulford Road in Mulberry, 

7 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

8 First Class Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5089 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant First Class 

5 Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6415

WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUE MEDFORD, Nurse Supervisor at Marion Correctional Institution, in her official and individual capacity; SID HARKLEROAD, Superintendent at Marion Correctional Institution, in his official and individual capacity; ANGELA TWITTY, in her official and individual capacity; JANE DOE, in her official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1-1-MU) Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 7, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Thomas Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Wayne Thomas Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Medford , No. CA02-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Frederick Vagen, Appellant, v Magdalena Birngruber, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
PROPPANT EXPRESS INVESTMENTS LLC,

PROPPANT EXPRESS SOLUTIONS LLC, Appellants

v.

OREN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Cross

- Appellant

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of

Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,

Intervenor

______________________

2020

- 1557 , 20 20

- 1572

______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademar k Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017

- 01917

.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ Case: 20-1557 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 06/03/2022P ROPPANT E XPRESS I NVESTMENTS LLC V

. O REN
T ECHNOLOGIES

, LLC 2

O R D E R

Upon consid eration of t he parties ’ j oint a greement to dismiss the appeals

,

IT IS ORDERED THAT :

(1) T h e motion is granted. The appeals are
dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

June 3, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 3, 2022 Case: 20-1557 Document: 62 Page: 2 Filed: 06/03/2022
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Certification
      of Principal** **Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Vision Acquisition I, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
      Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                David BergerDavid
                BergerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerNovember
                20, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMMED NAZIR BIN LEP

,

P etitioner

,

v. Civil Action No. 2 0

- 3344 (JDB)

JOSEPH R. BIDEN et al.

,

Respondents

.

FIFTH AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

Upon consideration of [ 1 24 ] respondents ’ unopposed motion to revise scheduling order

deadline

, and the entire record herein , it is hereby ORDERED that r espondents shall file their

reply in further support of [113] their sealed motion by not later than August 17 , 2022. SO

ORDERED

.

/s/

JOHN D. BATES

United States District Judge

Dated: August 9 , 2022
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2905 Filed: 07/09/19 Entered: 07/09/19 13:05:16 Page 1 of

1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2513 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 15:40:15 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2513 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 15:40:15 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2513 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 15:40:15 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2513 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 15:40:15 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2513 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 15:40:15 Page 5 of

5
Exhibit






NOTICE TO STOCKHOLDERS
OF STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETING


Notice is hereby given that a Meeting of Stockholders of Function(x) Inc. (formerly known as DraftDay Fantasy Sports Inc.) shall be held for the purpose of (i) updating the stockholders on the status of the Company; (ii) answering any questions that Company stockholders may have, and (iii) conducting such other business as may properly come before the board. 


The meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of Reed Smith LLP, 599 Lexington Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, New York.


All stockholders of record as of June 6, 2016 are invited to attend.  No votes are expected to be taken at the meeting, and the Company is not soliciting any proxies in connection with the meeting. The Company is not aware of any business to be brought before the meeting.


Dated the 9th day of June, 2016.


By Order of the Board of Directors








                    
Mitchell J. Nelson
Executive Vice President/Secretary
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)



The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Cadmus Communications Corporation, certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadmus Communications Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce V. Thomas                   |  |  |  | /s/ Paul K. Suijk                                
|Bruce V. Thomas                       |  |  |  | Paul K. Suijk                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)     
|                                      |  | 
|November 8, 2005                      |  |  |  | November 8, 2005
#### Donalena Hopkins v. Harry A. Hopkins.

Motion denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6655

JESSE BROWN GRAVES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Commissioner, Federal Bureau

of Prisons; B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-04-50-1-FPS)

Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 6, 2005

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse Brown Graves, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jesse Brown Graves, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Graves v. Lappin, No. CA-04-50-1-FPS (N.D.W.

Va. Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED