alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5108 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5108

To establish the Law School Clinic Certification Program of the United 
      States Patent and Trademark Office, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2014

  Mr. Jeffries (for himself and Mr. Chabot) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish the Law School Clinic Certification Program of the United 
      States Patent and Trademark Office, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USPTO LAW SCHOOL CLINIC CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--The Law School Clinic Certification Program of 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as implemented by the 
United States Patent and Trademark Office, is established as a program 
entitled the ``Law School Clinic Certification Program''. The Under 
Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the 
United States Patent and Trademark Office (in this section referred to 
as the ``Director'') may establish regulations and procedures for 
application to and participation in the program, which shall be 
available to accredited law schools. The Law School Clinic 
Certification Program shall be in effect for the 10-year period 
beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Report on the Program.--The Director shall, not later than the 
last day of the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate a report on the Law School Clinic 
Certification Program, describing the number of law schools and law 
students participating in the program, the work done through the 
program, the benefits of the program, and any recommendations of the 
Director for modifications to the program.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000744126
<NAME>                        First Chester County Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         27,852
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         76
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    109,221
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         3,373
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           3,495
<LOANS>                                        366,383
<ALLOWANCE>                                    6,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,011
<DEPOSITS>                                     449,600
<SHORT-TERM>                                   9,130
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            22,568
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,800
<OTHER-SE>                                     33,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 520,011
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7,645
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,880
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               29
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               9,554
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,557
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,928
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5,626
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  290
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (43)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,977
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,977
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,431
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.78
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,038
<LOANS-PAST>                                   338
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               6,261
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  182
<RECOVERIES>                                   43
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              6,412
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           6,412
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2712 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:03:56 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2712 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:03:56 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2712 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:03:56 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2712 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:03:56 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2712 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/21/19 15:03:56 Page 5 of

5
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2480

DUN FANG ZHENG,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A71-956-044)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston W. Tsai, Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner. Frank W.

Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Karen Fletcher Torstenson,

Assistant Director, Joan E. Smiley, Senior Litigation Counsel,

Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dun Fang Zheng appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying

his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. Our review of

the record discloses that the Board did not abuse its discretion

and its decision is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Zheng v. INS, No. A71-956-044

(B.I.A. Sep. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>



<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         2,925
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              20,189
<PP&E>                                       106,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                41,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                97,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         16,693
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       4,400
<OTHER-SE>                                    54,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  97,524
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              38,279
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 36,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (171)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                     616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              944
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     944
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .39
</TABLE


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                  5,175
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,175
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          5,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      45
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              4,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            5,175
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       10,399
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        10,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    10,087
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           10,087
<EPS-BASIC>                          166.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                          166.44


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7742

FELIX ORIAKHI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT HARDING; JOHN DOW, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98- 3465-L) Submitted: February 26, 1999 Decided: March 22, 1999 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Felix Oriakhi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s dismissal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 1998), of his Bivens* action as time-barred and the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Oriakhi v. Harding , No. CA-98-3465-L (D. Md. Nov. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered February 24, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00541-CV

JOHN D. COPELAND, Appellant

V.

JAY SANDON COOPER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-13097

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s February 15, 2014 motion to file corrected brief and extend time 

for filing. We ORDER the brief tendered to the Clerk on February 21, 2014 filed as of the date 

of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

s0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147190

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147190

COA: 308902

Saginaw CC: 10

- 034055

- FH

10

- 034057

- FH

TONYA JOY LEITZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 19, 2017

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-546

Lower Tribunal No. 07-17556

________________



### Marhlau Belizaire

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stacy D. Glick

, Judge.

Marhlau Belizaire

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

Appellant seeks review of the summary denial of his second petition for

habeas corpus filed November 9, 2016, and his second motion to correct illegalsentence filed December 2, 2016. We affirm the denial of the second motion to

correct illegal sentence for the reasons stated by the trial court. However, we

reverse the denial of the petition for habeas corpus.

The trial court properly treated the petition as a motion for postconviction

relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The court then held the

motion was untimely because it was filed outside the two-year limit for filing such

motions established by Rule 3.850(b). In doing so, the trial court miscalculated the

dates. While this court affirmed Appellant’s judgment and sentence on October 8,

2014, as indicated by the trial court, that ruling did not become final until the

mandate was issued on November 3, 2014. Beaty v. State

, 701 So. 2d 856, 857

(Fla. 1997) (“[T]he two-year period for filing a motion for postconviction relief

began to run upon the issuance of that court’s mandate.”). The Appellant’s motion

filed on November 2, 2014, was therefore timely.

The order under review mentions other grounds as bases for denial. We do

not address the other grounds because the required portions of the record were not

attached. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5). See also Juarez v. State

, 215 So. 3d 89,

90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Nottage v. State

, 61 So. 3d 1231, 1232-33 (Fla. 3d DCA

2011).

On remand, the trial court may either summarily deny the motion and attach

to its order those portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is

2entitled to no relief, or hold an evidentiary hearing and then rule on the allegations.

Id

.

Reversed and remanded.

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                        63
<INVENTORY>                                      9,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,234
<PP&E>                                          16,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,561
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,345
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,343
<SALES>                                         10,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,405
<CGS>                                            7,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    71
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    602
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                867
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       867
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1679]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 272, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 272 to include a site in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, adjacent to the Philadelphia Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 37-2009, filed 9/9/2009);                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (74 FR 47920-47921, September 18, 2009) and the application                           ( print page 29976)                        has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to expand FTZ 272 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, and further subject to a sunset provision that would terminate authority on May 31, 2017 for Site 9 if no activity has occurred under FTZ procedures before that date.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of May 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-12958 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### The People of the State of New York v. Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Opinion by

Brady, J.
----

| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/  JAMES A.      HAYWARD |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | James      A. Hayward                |   |
|   |   | Chief      Executive Officer    |   |
|   |   | August      14, 2008                 |   |