alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. MOSE COX.

(Filed 28 February, 1940.)

1. Criminal Law § 81c—

Where a general verdict of guilty is returned against a defendant prosecuted upon an indictment containing two counts of equal gravity, any error in the judge’s charge upon one of the counts is harmless, there being no exceptions to the instructions on the other count.

2. Criminal Law § 79—

An exception not brought forward and referred to in appellant’s brief is deemed abandoned, Rule 28.

Appeal by defendant from *Cowper, Special Judge,*at November Term, 1939, of Beaueoet.

No error.

The defendant was charged with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and there was a second count in the warrant charging him with unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. From judgment predicated upon a general verdict of guilty, the defendant appealed.

*178
      *Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton and Patton for the Skate.*

*LeRoy Scott and S. M. Blount for defendant.*

Devin, I.

Tbe only exception referred, to in defendant’s brief relates to tbe judge’s charge on tbe first count in tbe warrant. However, as there was a general verdict of guilty, and there was no exception to tbe judge’s instructions to tbe jury on tbe second count which charged sale of intoxicating liquor, any error in tbe trial judge’s statement of tbe law as to unlawful possession would become harmless. *S. v. Holder,*133 N. C., 709, 45 S. E., 862; *S. v. Coleman,*178 N. C., 757, 101 S. E., 261; *S. v. Jarrett,*189 N. C., 516, 127 S. E., 590. There was no motion for judgment of nonsuit. Tbe appellant did not include in bis case on appeal tbe evidence adduced in tbe trial, but tbe statement of tbe evidence contained in the judge’s charge which was sent up, and to which no exception was taken, shows sufficient evidence to support the verdict. The other exception noted by the defendant during the trial was not referred to in his brief, and therefore is deemed abandoned. Rule 28; *S. v. Lea,*203 N. C., 13, 164 S. E., 737; *In re Beard,*202 N. C., 661, 163 S. E., 748.

In the trial we find

No error.
#### Leonard Knox, Respondent, v. The Town of Gravesend, Appellant.

Judgment reduced to $180, and as reduced affirmed, without costs.—

Brown, P. J.:

This action is of the same character as that of Morson against the same defendant *(ante,*p. 52). Following the view there expressed we should reverse the ¡judgment and dismiss the complaint. But the appellant concedes an indebtedness to the plaintiff of $180 and a liability upon the part of the defendant therefor. The judgment must, therefore, be reduced to that amount, and so modified is affirmed, without costs.

Pratt and Dykman, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Unaudited.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         236,312
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (43,300)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               485,556
<PP&E>                                      18,295,505
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,106,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,674,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          651,078
<BONDS>                                     11,820,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,674,495
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,747,055
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  773,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               457,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             843,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (327,535)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (13.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Narachi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: January 26, 2015               
|                                     
|/s/ Michael A. Narachi               
|Michael A. Narachi                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4926 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4926

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State of Minnesota 
             as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The segment of Interstate Route 35 between milepost 133 at Forest 
Lake, Minnesota, and milepost 259 at Duluth, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the segment of Interstate Route 35 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4926

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State of Minnesota 
             as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, C.R.
      Cloutier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      C. R. Cloutier


________________________


C.R.
      Cloutier


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      10, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-133]



[[Page 1114]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending December 
19, 2009.

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, 
as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0343.
    Date Filed: December 16, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

TC3 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010k between Japan, Korea 
(Rep. of) and China (excluding Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR), and 
between Japan and Korea (Rep. of) (Memo 1342)
Intended effective date: 15 January 2010.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0346.
    Date Filed: December 16, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

TC3 Areawide Revalidating Resolution 002, (Memo 1343)
Intended effective date: 1 April 2010.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-133 Filed 1-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
FILED

April 24, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE 

 JANUARY 1996 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)

Appellee, ) No. 01C01-9409-CR-00330

 )

) Davidson County

v. ) 

) Hon. Seth Norman, Judge 

)

BOBBY KENNETH NASH, JR., ) (First Degree Murder)

) 

Appellant. )

For the Appellant: For the Appellee:

Sam E. Wallace, Jr. John Knox Walkup

227 Second Avenue, N. Attorney General of Tennessee

Nashville, TN 37201 and

Darian B. Taylor

Assistant Attorney General of Tennessee 

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

Victor S. Johnson, III

District Attorney General

and

Kimberly Hattaway

Washington Square

222 2nd Avenue North

Nashville, TN 37201-1649

OPINION FILED:____________________

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

Joseph M. Tipton

Judge
2

O P I N I O N

The defendant, Bobby Kenneth Nash, Jr., appeals from his jury conviction

in the Davidson County Criminal Court for first degree murder. He received a sentence

of life in prison. In this appeal as of right, he contends that the evidence is insufficient

to support his first degree murder conviction.

In the light most favorable to the state, see State v. Cabbage, 571 S.W.2d

832 (Tenn. 1978), the proof established that the defendant shot his aunt six times while

she was stopped at a red light. The gun was within twelve inches of her head when he

fired four of the shots into her face. During the six months preceding the shooting, the

defendant and the victim were involved in a dispute over the defendant’s father’s

estate. The defendant remarked that he wanted to get back at the victim and described

how it would be possible for him to go to the top of a school building and shoot the

victim as she left the house where she was living. On another occasion during the

months preceding the shooting, he stated that the best way to remedy serious problems

that you have with a person is to kill the person. Two weeks before the shooting the

defendant refused to promise that he would not kill the victim.

After full consideration of the record, the briefs, and the law governing the

issue presented, we are of the opinion that the evidence is sufficient to support the

defendant’s conviction for first degree murder and that no precedential value would be

derived from the rendering of a full opinion. Therefore we conclude that the judgment

of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tenn Ct. Crim. App. R.

 

Joseph M. Tipton, Judge 
3

CONCUR:

 

Gary R. Wade, Judge 

 

Paul G. Summers, Judge
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated July 5, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-211086) of Smart Trust 249, comprising
Smart Trust, Argus Dividend Growers Total Return Trust, Series 9.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


July 5, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This following information is being submitted to update previously disclosed
earnings per share amounts.  The amounts shown below represent Basic and Diluted
Earnings Per Share under SFAF 128. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                       <C>          <C>         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             YEAR         9-MOS       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         AUG-31-1996  AUG-31-1996 AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>              AUG-31-1996  MAY-31-1996 FEB-28-1996
<CASH>                        90,295      24,064      13,347
<SECURITIES>                       0           0           0
<RECEIVABLES>                  9,927      88,744      45,059
<ALLOWANCES>                   1,952       2,133       1,735
<INVENTORY>                   53,446      50,964     106,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               6,950       6,161       5,104
<PP&E>                       120,823      79,390      75,561
<DEPRECIATION>                57,951      42,032      40,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               290,220     213,048     211,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         71,849      84,733      96,495
<BONDS>                       38,517      10,733      14,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0           0           0
<PREFERRED>                    7,643           0           0
<COMMON>                      40,673      40,508      40,284
<OTHER-SE>                    87,570      47,406      46,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 290,220     213,048     211,236
<SALES>                      371,772     290,004     116,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             371,772     290,004     116,136
<CGS>                        288,744     227,363      91,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 32,040      22,686      13,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0           0           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0           0           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               952       1,164         456
<INCOME-PRETAX>               50,266      39,028      10,828
<INCOME-TAX>                  19,108      14,885       4,115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           31,158      24,123       6,713
<DISCONTINUED>                     0           0           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0           0           0
<CHANGES>                          0           0           0
<NET-INCOME>                  31,158      24,123       6,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.77        0.60        0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.73        0.58        0.16
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 1

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 2

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 3

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 4

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 5

of 11

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 7

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 8

of 11
RECORDING REQUESTED BY 

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL To: 

OTMK Law 

Attn: Kymberli Aguilar 

2500 Venture Oaks Way, Ste. 320 

Sacramento, CA 95833 

- � \ I 

PARTIAL RELEASE OF MECHANICS UEN 

APN: 3711-012 

77 Beale Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

,, 

. .. ... , \, 

, I I 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 9

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 10

of 11
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3057-1 Filed: 07/18/19 Entered: 07/18/19 12:33:55 Page 11

of 11
#### Ernest Ludeke and others, Respondents, v. J. Lawrence McKeever, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one case and disbursements in both. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
#### STATE v. WRIGHT BYNUM and WILLIAM RANDALL.

(Filed 10 September, 1930.)

Criminal Law L a — Appeal in capital cases will be dismissed for failure to prosecute according to Rules of Court, no errors appearing of record.

Whether the Supreme Court acquires jurisdiction of an appeal in *forma pauperis*from a conviction of a capital felony when the affidavit for leave to appeal fails to state, as required by C. S., 4651, that the “application is in good faith,” *queere?*and where the appeal has not been prosecuted as required by the Rules of Court the appeal will be dismissed upon the motion of the Attorney-General after an examination of the record proper for errors appearing upon its face.

MotioN by State to docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.*

Stacy, C. J\

At the May Term, 1930, Wilson Superior Court, the defendants herein, Wright Bynum and William Bandall, were tried upon an indictment charging them with the murder of one Callie Willi-ford, which resulted in a conviction and sentence of death as to both of the defendants. From the verdict thus rendered and judgment entered thereon, the defendants gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, but this has not been perfected as required by the rules, in fact nothing has been done looking to this end.

As the attempted appeal is *in forma pauperis,*and the affidavit for leave to appeal without giving security for costs fails to state, as required by C. S., 4651, that “the application, is in good faith,” it may be *377doubted as to whether we have any jurisdiction to hear the matter. *S. v. Brumfield,*198 N. C., 613. Nevertheless, as the case is a capital one, we have examined the papers and find no error on the face of the record proper.

The motion of the State must be allowed.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5102 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5102

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the 
   requirement for employer disclosure of information on health care 
  coverage of employees who are Medicare beneficiaries, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 14, 2014

  Mr. Lewis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the 
   requirement for employer disclosure of information on health care 
  coverage of employees who are Medicare beneficiaries, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Employer Relief Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. REPEALING SECTION 1862(B)(5) OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1862(b) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395y(b)) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to 
information required to be provided on or after January 1, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from HCW PENSION
REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED  PARTNERSHIP 2000 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000745538
<NAME>                          HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      721
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   10,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (5,171)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            6,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                   5,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              6,388
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          1,389
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 48
<EPS-BASIC>                                                2.99 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>