Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s opinion should not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 61117 Su m m ar y Cal endar

E D D IE S H O R T Y , P l a i n tiff - A p p ell a n t v. K E N TR E LL LID D E LL , M edi c alD i r ec t or , I ndivi dual l y and i n hi s of f i c i al c a p a c ity ; T H O M A S L E H M A N , M e d ic a l D ir e c to r , In d iv id u a llya n din H is O f f i c i alC apac i t y, D efen da n t s - A pp el l ees

A p p ea lf

rom the U n i tedS tates D i stri ct C ou rt fo rth e N o r th e r n D is tr ic t o f M is s is s ip p i U SD C N o. 4: 07- C V

- 207

B ef ore G A R Z A , C L E M E N T , an d O W E N , C i rcui tJu dg es . P E R C U R IA M: * E d d i e S h o r ty , pro se , a p p e a l s t he d i s t r i c t c o ur t ’ s d i s m i s s a l o f hi s § 1983 del iberate i n di f

ference cl ai m againstD r. K en t rel lL i dd el lan d an un - n am ed
nurs e, and t he c our t ’ s gr ant o f su m m a r y j udgm enti n favorof D r . Th om as L eh m an . Sh ort y com pl ai n s t h at he suf fers f rom hea da ches, di z z i ne s s , w e ak n ess, nausea, and vo m i t i ng . H e a l l ege d t hatm edi c alper so nnelathi s c or r ec t i onal United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 61117

2 fa c ilityd idn o t p r o v id e a d e q u a te tr e a tm e n t fo rth e s e p r o b le m s , a n dth a t t h e ir fail ur e t o do s o c o ns t i t ut e d de l ibe r at e i ndif fe r e nc e t o hi s s e r i o us m e di c alne e ds in v io la tio n o f h is rig h ts u n d e rth e E ig h th A m e n d m e n t. S h orty ’ s m ed i ca lreco rd s sh ow tha t he h a s a h i storyof p sy c h ia tr ic pro bl em s i n addi t i on t o t he c hro ni c s ym pt om s f r om w h i c h he s uf

fer s, and t hat th e s y m p to m s p r e -d a te h is in c a r c e r a tio n . T h e r e c o r d s a ls o s h o w th a t s in c e h is i n ca rcera ti on i n 19 9 9 , h e h a s b ee n tre a tedm ore th a n fi ft y ti m es for h i s h ea l th
c om pl ai nt s. Pri so n doc t or s pre sc r ibed nu m er ous m edi c at i ons , w hi c h Sh or t y has notal w ays be en c om pl i ant in ta k i ng. Pri so n doc t or s al so gaveShort y s eve r al d ia g n o s tic te s ts , in c lu d in gab r a in s c a n . T h e e tio lo g yo f S h o r ty ’s s y m p to m s is unk now n and m ay be re l at ed t o hi s psy c hi at r i c probl em s; a pr es c r i pt i on f oran a n ti-d e p r e s s a n t a p p e a r s to h a v e le s s e n e d , a t le a s tfo ratim e , h is ch r o n ic h e a d a c h e s . T h e dist ri ct cou rt con cl u d ed tha t t h e u n d i sp u tedfa cts sh ow ed tha t Sh orty di d n ot h a v e a cogn i zable del iberate i n di f ference cl ai m . I tgran t ed su m m ary j udg m e nti n fav o ro f D r . Le hm an, w ho ha d t r e at e d Sho r t y, a nd d i s m i s s e d t he
c l ai m s agai nstD r . Li ddel l , w h o w as notal l ege d t o have had any per so nal i n vo lve m en t in S h orty ’ s trea tm en t. T h e cou rt also dism i sse d , f or fail u re to state
a c l ai m , Sho r t y’ s all e ga t i o ns ag ai ns t t he nur s e w ho di s pe ns e s hi s m e di c at i o n b ut
w h o w a s n o t n a m e din th e co m p la in t. W e af f i rm f or t h e reasons st ated by the di st ri ctcourti n i t s w el l

- reasoned
a n dt h o r o u g h o p i n i o n o f De c e mb e r1 , 2 0 0 8
. A F F I RMED.