alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5076 

To amend the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act to increase knowledge 

concerning, and improve services for, runaway and homeless youth who 

are victims of trafficking. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2014 

Mr. HECK of Nevada (for himself, Mr. KLINE, and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act to increase 

knowledge concerning, and improve services for, runaway 

and homeless youth who are victims of trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhancing Services 

5 for Runaway and Homeless Victims of Youth Trafficking 

6 Act of 2014’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

8 The Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 5701 et seq.) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5076 IH

1 (1) in section 343(b)(5)— 

2 (A) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘‘, se3 vere forms of trafficking in persons (as defined 

4 in section 103(9) of the Trafficking Victims 

5 Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9))), 

6 and sex trafficking (as defined in section 

7 103(10) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 7102(10)))’’ 

8 before the semicolon at the end, 

9 (B) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ‘‘, 

10 severe forms of trafficking in persons (as de11 fined in section 103(9) of the Trafficking Vic12 tims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 

13 7102(9))), and sex trafficking (as defined in 

14 section 103(10) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 

15 7102(10)))’’ after ‘‘assault’’, and 

16 (C) in subparagraph (C) by inserting ‘‘, in17 cluding such youth who are victims of traf18 ficking (as defined in section 103(15) of the 

19 Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 

20 U.S.C. 7102(15)))’’ before the semicolon at the 

21 end, and 

22 (2) in section 351(a) by striking ‘‘or sexual ex23 ploitation’’ and inserting ‘‘sexual exploitation, severe 

24 forms of trafficking in persons (as defined in section 

25 103(9) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5076 IH

1 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9))), or sex trafficking (as 

2 defined in section 103(10) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 

3 7102(10)))’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[663 NE2d 1251, 641 NYS2d 221]

#### Arthur Brown, Appellant, v Christopher Street Owners Corp. et al., Respondents.

Argued January 11, 1996;

decided February 13, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Norman Leonard Cousins,*New York City, for appellant.

*939*Anthony J. DeMarco, Jr.,*Brooklyn, and *Sean J. Geoghan*for Christopher Street Owners Corp., respondent.

*Curtis, Zaklukiewicz, Vasile, Devine & McElhenny,*Merrick *(Stephen J. Molinelli*of counsel), for Courtfield Properties Management, Inc., respondent.

*Quirk & Bakalor, P. C,*New York City *(Thomas E. Tookey*of counsel), for Anne Hack, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff Arthur Brown was injured when he fell from the second-floor ledge of a cooperative apartment building in lower Manhattan. Defendant Anne Hack had hired plaintiff to wash the windows of her one-bedroom apartment and, at the time of his fall, plaintiff was attempting to wash the exterior of one of the windows.

Although Labor Law § 240 (1), the first section of Labor Law article 10 ("Building Construction, Demolition and Repair Work”), provides for absolute liability against any contractor or owner who fails to furnish an employee with the appropriate scaffolding, ladders, slings or other safety devices during the "erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, [or] cleaning” of a building, the "cleaning” encompassed under the statute does not include the routine, household window washing at issue here *(Connors v Boorstein,*4 NY2d 172, 175). Unlike the painting of a house *(Rivers v Sauter,*26 NY2d 260) or the cleaning of all the windows of a large, nonresidential structure such as a school *(Koenig v Patrick Constr. Corp.,*298 NY 313), the routine cleaning of the five windows of a single cooperative apartment by an individual engaged by the apartment owner is not the kind of undertaking for which the Legislature sought to impose liability under Labor Law § 240.

In light of the parties’ failure to address Labor Law § 202 ("Protection of the public and of persons engaged at window cleaning and cleaning of exterior surfaces of buildings”) in their briefs, we do not reach the question whether it provides the exclusive Labor Law remedy in cases such as this involving window cleaning *(see, Terry v Young Men’s Hebrew Assn.,*78 NY2d 978, 979).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur; Judge Titone taking no part.

*940Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board


Foreign-Trade Zone 64--Jacksonville, FL; Site Renumbering Notice

    FTZ 64 was approved by the FTZ Board (the Board) on December 29, 
1980 (Board Order 170, 46 FR 1330, 01/06/81) and expanded on September 
20, 1985 (Board Order 312, 50 FR 40209, 10/02/85), on December 24, 1986 
(Board Order 337, 52 FR 1214, 01/12/87), on October 29, 1991 (Board 
Order 540, 56 FR 56627, 11/06/91), and on October 7, 2008 (Board Order 
1579, 73 FR 61781, 10/17/08).
    FTZ 64 currently consists of 7 ``sites'' totaling some 1,378 acres 
in the Jacksonville, Florida area. The current update does not alter 
the physical boundaries that have previously been approved, but instead 
involves an administrative renumbering of existing Site 3 to separate 
unrelated, non-contiguous sites for record-keeping purposes.
    All sites are located in Jacksonville, Florida. Under this 
revision, the site list for FTZ 64 will be as follows: Site 1 (67 
acres)--within the Jacksonville International Airport at Pecan Park and 
Terrell Roads; Site 2 (43 acres)--warehouse facility located at 2201 
North Ellis Road; Site 3 (809 acres)--JPA Blount Island Terminal 
Complex, 9620 Dave Rawls Boulevard; Site 4 (200 acres)--within the 
International Tradeport Complex on Airport Road; Site 5 (4 acres)--
warehouse facility located at 1505 Dennis Street; Site 7 (47 acres)--
warehouse facility located at the Westlake Industrial Park, 9767 
Pritchard Road; Site 8 (75 acres)--located at One Imeson Park 
Boulevard, within the central western portion of the Imeson 
International Industrial Park; and, Site 9 (133 acres)--JPA Talleyrand 
Docks and Terminal Facility, at 2085 Talleyrand Avenue. Site 6 has 
expired.
    For further information, contact Maureen Hinman at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f220e1a1d0a0a0141270601020e012f1b1d0e0b0a41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="feb39f8b8c9b9b90d0b69790939f90be8a8c9f9a9bd0999188">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-0627.

    Dated: May 20, 2010.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13056 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### IRIS RAY, by Her Next Friend, CHAMP RAY, v. EDITH ROBINSON, Administratrix.

(Filed 1 November, 1939.)

1. Quasi Contracts § 1—

The law will imply a promise to pay the reasonable value of personal services rendered by one person to or for another which are knowingly and voluntarily received by him, in the absence of some express or implied gratuity.

2. Quasi Contracts § 2—

Evidence that plaintiff went to the home of defendant principally to-perform services for defendant’s mother with expectation of pay, and. *431that plaintiff did perform such services until the death of defendant’s mother, *is held*sufficient to be submitted to the jury in plaintiff’s action to recover the reasonable value of the services rendered.

Appeal by defendant from *Ervin, Special Judge,*at January Special Term, 1939, of TaNCEy.

Civil action to recover for personal services.

The record discloses that on 24 April, 1934, Iris Eay, a minor, went to the home of John L. Young as a servant in the house principally to wait upon his mother,, Mrs. Lodema Young, who was quite old and infirm, and there worked with expectation of pay until the death of Mrs. Young on 4 December, 1937.

This action is to recover for the reasonable value of the services rendered. Plaintiff’s father, in open court, waived any right of recovery on his part for plaintiff’s services. The complaint was accordingly amended and the jury found, upon issues duly submitted, that plaintiff was entitled to recover $1,065, and that plaintiff’s father aforetime had consented for her to receive the compensation therefor.

From judgment on the verdict, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Huskins & Wilson for plaintiff, appellee.*

*Anglin & Randolph for defendant, appellant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Upon issues of fact, determinable alone by the jury, the plaintiff has been allowed to recover accordant with settled principles of law. *Winkler v. Killian,*141 N. C., 575, 54 S. E., 540; *Bank v. McCullers,*201 N. C., 412, 160 S. E., 497; *Landreth v. Morris,*214 N. C., 619, 200 S. E., 378.

It is established by a number of decisions, that in the absence of some express or implied gratuity, usually arising out of family relationship or mutual interdependence, services rendered by one person to or for another, which are knowingly and voluntarily received, are presumed to be given and accepted in expectation of being paid for, and the law will imply a promise to pay what they are reasonably worth. *Winkler v. Killian, supra; Callahan v. Wood,*118 N. C., 752, 24 S. E., 542. Here, there is no presumption of gratuity, *Stallings v. Ellis,*136 N. C., 69, 48 S. E., 548, but rather facts and circumstances from which the inference may be drawn that payment was intended on the one hand and expected on the other. *Brown v. Williams,*196 N. C., 247, 145 S. E., 233. Upon this principle the case has been tried, and the record is apparently free from error.

As no reversible error has been made to appear, the verdict and judgment will be upheld. See *Price v. Askins,*212 N. C., 583, 194 S. E., 284, and cases there cited.

No error.
#### MORRIS DUSSELDORF, Respondent, *v.*LUDWIG REDLICH and *W.*H. HARDMAN. composing firm of L. REDLICH *&*Co., Appellants.

*Code of Civil Procedure, section*682 — *right to have secw'ity on attachment increased wider*— *widei'taking given wider section*688 *not a waiver of.*

The giving- of an undertaking under section 688 of the Code of Civil Procedure to relieve property attached ii-oin. the lien thereof, is not a waiver of the right to have the security given upon the issuing of the attachment increased, in pursuance of section 682 of the said Code.

Appeal from an order denying a motion, under section 682 of tire Code of Civil Procedure, that additional security be given on an attachment.

The plaintiff obtained an attachment against the defendants as non-residents, upon filing the usual bond required by the Code. The defendants thereupon appeared and filed a bond, as required by statute, to discharge the attachment, the sureties duly justified, the bond was approved and an order was entered by defendants discharging the attachment. Defendants now moved that plaintiff's bond, given to obtain the attachment, be increased.

*Rudolph Sampler,*for the appellants.

*Otto*Horwits, for the respondent.

*Per Curiam :*

The affidavits on the part of the appellants show a case entitling them to additional security. The court denied the motion solely on the ground that the giving of an undertaking, under section 688 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to relieve the property attached from the operation of the attachment, is a waiver of the *625right to have the security increased, pursuant to section 682 of that Code.

We think the undertaking, under section 688, becomes merely a substitute for the property attached, and the warrant of attachment is not thereby so far discharged as to prevent the defendants from requiring the additional security provided for by section 682.

The order should be reversed, and an order made directing additional security to be given in the sum of $500, with sureties who can justify in at least double that amount, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Davis, P. J., Beady and Ingalls, JJ.

Ordered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Scott W. Smith,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter of 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: March 31, 2008

 
|   | /s/ Scott W. Smith                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Scott W. Smith                         |
|   |                                   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive  Officer)         |
|   | Vanguard Natural  Resources, LLC       |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infinite Graphics Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clifford F. Stritch, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



                                                    /S/ Clifford F. Stritch, Jr.
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Clifford F. Stritch, Jr.
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    March 13, 2003




                                      -18-
Exhibit 13.4
  
  Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
 Of 3SBio Inc.
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of 3SBio Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as amended and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bo Tan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  Date: November 3, 2011
 
 By:

/s/    Bo TanName:

Bo TanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4812 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4812

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the Administrator of 
 the Transportation Security Administration to establish a process for 
   providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services for 
 veterans traveling to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor 
                 their service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Honor Flight Act''.
SEC. 2. HONOR FLIGHT PROGRAM.
    (a) In General.--Title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
after section 44927 the following new section:
``Sec. 44928. Honor Flight program
    ``The Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration 
shall establish, in collaboration with the Honor Flight Network or 
other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, a process for 
providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services for 
veterans traveling on an Honor Flight Network private charter, or such 
other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, to visit war 
memorials built and dedicated to honor the service of such veterans.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
44927 the following new item:

``44928. Honor Flight program.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1991 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 14:25:51 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1991 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 14:25:51 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1991 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 14:25:51 Page 3 of

3
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350Certification**

** **

In connection with thisannual report of Systematic Momentum II LLC, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, themanager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 31, 2009      |                  |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                           |                  |
| By                             | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis              |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer       |                  |
| (Principal  Financial Officer) |                  |
|                                |                       |  |

 

1

----