alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Roderick C. Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

*/s/**Roderick C. Bartlett*

Roderick C. Bartlett

Chief Financial Officer

 

Date: January 13, 2023
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	 U.S. Air Force delivers Haitian National Police equipment to Haiti
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title"> U.S. Air Force delivers Haitian National Police equipment to Haiti</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Oct. 15, 2022</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>MIAMI, Oct. 15, 2022 – Today, in response to a request for international assistance from the Haitian government, a U.S. Air Force C-17, based at Joint Base Charleston, S.C., transported vital security equipment, including tactical and armored vehicles, purchased by the Haitian National Police (HNP) from Canadian Forces Base Trenton in Ontario, Canada, to Port-au-Prince, Haiti.</p>

<p>The delivery of the vital equipment was part of a joint operation involving U.S. Air Force and Royal Canadian Air Force aircraft.</p>

<p>The delivered equipment will help the HNP ensure access to vital resources and infrastructure urgently needed in Haiti to respond to a public-health crisis following a recent rise of cholera cases in the country.</p>

<p>Today’s U.S. Air Force transport mission comes three days after U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Andrew Croft, military deputy commander of SOUTHCOM, accompanied U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Brian A. Nichols, to Port-au-Prince. Nichols, led a U.S. interagency delegation on a two-day visit to the Caribbean nation, where they met with Prime Minister Ariel Henry, the Montana Group, private sector leaders, and broader civil society groups. They assessed how the U.S. government can continue providing various forms of assistance aimed at helping the country improve security and respond to the growing humanitarian crisis.</p>

<p>Together with the Haitian government, the United States and Canada affirm the importance of working together to support the restoration of security in Haiti in partnership with the international community.</p>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5106 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5106

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 Admiral Callaghan Lane in Vallejo, California, as the ``Philmore 
                     Graham Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHILMORE GRAHAM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 100 Admiral Callaghan Lane in Vallejo, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Philmore Graham Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Philmore 
Graham Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5106

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 100 Admiral Callaghan Lane in Vallejo, California, as the ``Philmore 
                     Graham Post Office Building''.
```
#### MORRIS & COMPANY v. D. W. CLEVE et al.

(Filed 14 September, 1927.)

Appeal and Error — Objections and Exceptions — Premature Appeals — Dismissal — Pleadings—Amendments—Courts.

Where the trial judge has allowed the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint upon due notice, within ten days after the receipt of the certificate by the clerk of the trial court from the Supreme Court on a former appeal, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, the procedure is, if objected to by the defendants, to note an exception and appeal from the final judgment, and an appeal otherwise will bo dismissed as premature.

Appeal by defendants, D. W. and W. A. Cleve, from *Daniels, J.,*at April Term, 1927, of Beaueokt.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Ward & Orimes and E. G. Garter for*plaintiff.

*Guión & Guión and W. 0. Rodman for defendants.*

Stacy, C. J.

This case was before us at the Spring Term, 1927, and is reported in 193 N. C., 389. Within ten days after the receipt of the certificate from this Court, sustaining the demurrer interposed by the present appealing defendants, the plaintiff, after due notice, moved for leave to amend the complaint under C. S., 515. (See, also, C. S., 546, and annotations thereunder.) This motion was allowed, and from the *203order permitting plaintiff to file an amended complaint the defendants, D. *W.*Cleve and W. A. Oleve, appeal, assigning error in said ruling. The appeal must be dismissed as premature, since the proper procedure was to note an exception and appeal from the final judgment, if adverse to the defendants. *Goodwin v. Fertilizer Works,*123 N. C., 162; *Parker v. Harden,*122 N. C., 111.

Appeal dismissed.
1

The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3633

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Arthur Schuyler Ross, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 26, 2008

Filed: October 27, 2008

___________

Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Ross appeals the district court’s1

 order denying his motion for

reconsideration. After careful review, see Broadway v. Norris, 193 F.3d 987, 989 (8th

Cir. 1999) (construing motion for reconsideration as Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion and

reviewing for abuse of discretion), we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5050 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. SIMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘May 31, 1918 Act Re5 peal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) 1918 ACT.—The term ‘‘1918 Act’’ means 

9 the Act of May 31, 1918 (40 Stat. 592, chapter 88). 

10 (2) FORT HALL TOWNSITE.—The term ‘‘Fort 

11 Hall Townsite’’ means the land that was taken out 

12 of trust by being set aside or set apart under the 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5050 IH

1 1918 Act on the Fort Hall Reservation, consisting of 

2 approximately 120 acres in the East Half of the 

3 Northeast Quarter in Section 35 and the West Half 

4 of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter in Sec5 tion 36, Township 4 South, Range 34 East, Boise 

6 Meridian, Idaho, based upon a survey completed on 

7 May 19, 1921, and depicted on the document enti8 tled ‘‘Plat of the Townsite of Fort Hall’’ on file with 

9 Bingham County, Idaho and the Tribes. 

10 (3) TRIBES.—The term ‘‘Tribes’’ means the 

11 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reserva12 tion. 

13 SEC. 3. REPEAL. 

14 The 1918 Act is repealed. 

15 SEC. 4. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Tribes shall have the exclu17 sive right of first refusal to purchase at fair market value 

18 any land— 

19 (1) within the Fort Hall Townsite; and 

20 (2) offered for sale. 

21 (b) ACQUIRED LAND HELD IN TRUST.—The United 

22 States shall hold in trust for the benefit of the Tribes or 

23 a member of the Tribes, as applicable— 

24 (1) any land owned or acquired by the Tribes 

25 or a member of the Tribes within the Fort Hall 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5050 IH

1 Townsite before the date of enactment of this Act; 

2 and 

3 (2) any land owned or acquired by the Tribes 

4 or a member of the Tribes within the Fort Hall 

5 Townsite on or after the date of enactment of this 

6 Act. 

7 SEC. 5. EFFECT. 

8 Nothing in this Act affects any valid right to any land 

9 set aside or set apart under the 1918 Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                        |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  /s/      Meg A. Gentle                                                                                                |
| Meg      A. Gentle                                                                                                          |
| Chief      Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner      of Cheniere Energy Partners,L.P. |

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. LOUIS JAM ES R OM ER O,

De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 16-30007

D.C . No. 4:12-c r-00051-B M M M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na Sam E. Ha ddon, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 18, 2017 ** B e fore : TR OTT, TASHIM A, a nd C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s. Louis Ja m e s R om e ro a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing his motion for a

se nte nc e re duc tion unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2). W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED JAN 25 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). R om e ro’ s re que st for ora l argum e nt is de nie d .R om e ro c onte nds tha t he is e ntitle d to a

se nte nc e re duc tion unde r Am e ndm e nt 782 to the

Se nte nc ing Guide line s. W e re vie w de novo whe the r a distric t c o urt ha s a

uthority to m odify

a se nte nc e unde r se c tion 3582(c )(2). S e e Unite d State s v . W e sson , 583 F.3d 728, 730 (9th C ir. 2009). B e c a use R o m e ro wa s se nte nc e d a s a

c are e r offe nde r unde r U.S.S.G. § 4B 1.1, the distric t c ourt c orre c tly de te rm i ne d tha

t he is not e ligiblefor a

se nte nc e re duc tion. Se eid. C ontra ry to R om e ro’ s argum e nt, the distric t c ourt a de quate ly e xpla ine d its de te rm i nation a

nd it ha d no c a

u se to c onside r the 18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) se nte nc ing fa c t ors. Se eDillon v . Unite d State s , 560 U.S. 817, 827 (2010) (only if de fe nda

nt is e ligiblefor a

se nte nc e re duc tion doe s the distric t c ourt proc e e d to theste p of c onside ring the se c tion 3553(a ) se nte nc ing fa c tors). R om e ro’ s a rgum e nts tha

t he should not ha

ve be e n se nte nc e d a s a

c are e r offe nde r and tha

t the distric t

c ourt viola te d doubleje o pa

rdy whe n it e nha

nc e d his se nte nc e ba se d on a prior c onvic t ion are n ot c ogniz a

ble in se c tion 3582(c )(2) proc e e dings. Se eDillon , 560 U.S. a t 831. AFFIRM E D.

1 6 - 3 0 0 0 7 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12177 and <greek-i>12178]


New Hampshire Disaster Number NH-00017

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New 
Hampshire (FEMA-1913-DR), dated 05/12/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/14/2010 through 03/31/2010.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/24/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/12/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/14/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of New 
Hampshire, dated 05/12/2010, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Hillsborough.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-13196 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CombiMatrix Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2008, (the "Report"), I, Scott Burell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | By: |  | /s/SCOTT BURELLScott Burell
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)March 19, 2008
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,403
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             174
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                34,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    193,682
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        239,484
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 487,187
<DEPOSITS>                                     369,926
<SHORT-TERM>                                    36,152
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,416
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,780
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 487,187
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,446
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,382
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   847
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,675
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,913
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,634
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,041
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       10
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,834
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,834
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.06
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,028
<LOANS-PAST>                                       278
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,430
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       11
<RECOVERIES>                                        49
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,478
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,221
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,257
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit B 

Exhibit B page 1 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 1

of 15
Exhibit B page 2 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 2

of 15
Exhibit B page 3 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 3

of 15
Exhibit B page 4 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 4

of 15
Exhibit B page 5 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 5

of 15
Exhibit B page 6 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 6

of 15
Exhibit B page 7 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 7

of 15
Exhibit B page 8 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 8

of 15
Exhibit B page 9 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 9

of 15
Exhibit B page 10 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 10

of 15
Exhibit B page 11 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 11

of 15
Exhibit B page 12 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 12

of 15
Exhibit B page 13 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 13

of 15

Exhibit B page 15 of 15

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2770-2 Filed: 06/26/19 Entered: 06/26/19 21:59:03 Page 15

of 15
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Brandofino, Chief Executive Officer of Glowpoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)

The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |     |                        
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|Date:  November 12, 2008 | By: | /s/ MICHAEL BRANDOFINO 
|                         |     | Michael Brandofino     
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Glowpoint, Inc. and will be retained by Glowpoint, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
#### Max Bertuch, Respondent, v. Michael Sweeney and another, Appellants.

— Order refusing motion to vacate arrest affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.