alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.5
(logo) Grant Thornton

Accountants and Business Advisors


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders
LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria ("Management's
Report"), that Land America Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company")
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential and
commercial mortgage backed securities for which the Company served as
third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria
1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x)
and 1122(d)(4)(xiii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to
the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Land America Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

San Diego, CA
February 6, 2008


12340 El Camino Real
Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92130
T 858.704.8000
F 858.704.8099
W www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP
US Member of Grant Thornton International
|              |                                            | Drawing List      | Page 3 | Total 3       |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|---------------|
| BuildingOwner     | Shenyang Sunshine PharmaceuticalCompany Limited | Design No.        |   | Project No.   |   |
| Project Title     |                                            | Sub-project Title |   | Design Item   | Electric |
| Drawing No.       | Drawing Title                                   | Size              | Remark |
| D558-E-331        | AUTOMATIC CONTROLWIRING DIAGRAM (PLCP-2) 2      | A1                |   |
| D558-E-332        | AUTOMATIC CONTROLWIRING DIAGRAM (PLCP-3) 3      | A1                |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
|              |                                            |              |   |
| Project Principal |                                            | Checked by        |   | Authorized by |   | Date | 2009.05.15 |

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 1 9

- 0 0109

- C V

Style: Robert Finch II v. Angela Stegman

Date motion filed * : March 7 , 201 9

Type of motion: Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal

Party filing motion: A ppellant Robert Finch II

Document to be filed: Proof of payment for reporter’s record fee

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date s : February 3, 2019 ( N otice of Appeal deadline)

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due D ate s : 2/18 /19 (15

- day grace period)

Date s Requested: 2 / 13 /1 9 (NOA filing date); 3/17/19 ( RR fee )

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: March 1 9 , 201 9.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _ Appellant’s m otion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal is granted

because his notice of appeal was filed on February 13, 2019, within the 15

- day grace

period ending on February 18, 2019, and his motion provides a reasonable explanation

for the 1 0

- day delay

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5 (b)

, 26.1 (b)

, 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner

, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Hone v. Hanafin

, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886

- 87 (Tex.

2003 ). A dditionally, th e Court grants appellant’s extension request to pay the reporter’s

record fee by March 1 9 , 2019.

Judge’ s signature:

____

/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

_______

x Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___ March 19, 2019

__
#### Squire Hill, Respondent, v. Robert S. Westcott, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Pratt, J.:

It seems clear that the contract in question, herein was a specific contract between Westcott on the one side and Hill and Harrison on the other, wherein Westcott agreed to pay 1-Iill and Harrison ten cents per can carfcitge on milk carted by them from their creamery at Sidney to the station at the same place and shipped over certain specified lines of railroad. The milk was shipped as per this agreement. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Brown, P. J., and Dykman, J., concurred.
##### 



MIDSOUTH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
    EXHIBIT 11
 
 Second Quarter
    
    Second Quarter
    
    Year-to-Date
    
    Year-to-DateJune 30,
    
    June 30,
    
    June 30,
    
    June 30,2005
    
    2004
    
    2005
    
    2004BASICEarnings:Income applicable to common stock
    
    $
    2,040,253
    
    
    $
    1,745,367
    
    
    $
    3,963,676
    
    
    $
    3,406,315Shares:Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
    
    
    4,897,241
    
    
    
    4,387,392
    
    
    
    4,891,197
    
    
    
    4,382,915Earnings per common share:Income applicable to common stock
    
    $
    0.42
    
    
    $
    0.40
    
    
    $
    0.81
    
    
    $
    0.77DILUTEDEarnings:Net income
    
    $
    2,040,253
    
    
    $
    1,745,367
    
    
    $
    3,963,676
    
    
    $
    3,406,315Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
    
    
    4,897,241
    
    
    
    4,387,392
    
    
    
    4,891,197
    
    
    
    4,382,915Assuming exercise of options, reduced by
the number of shares which could have
been purchased with the proceeds from
exercise of such options at the
average issue price
    
    
    171,680
    
    
    
    197,338
    
    
    
    175,701
    
    
    
    200,009Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding, as adjusted
    
    
    5,068,921
    
    
    
    4,584,730
    
    
    
    5,066,898
    
    
    
    4,582,924Fully diluted earnings per common share
    
    $
    0.40
    
    
    $
    0.38
    
    
    $
    0.78
    
    
    $
    0.74
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Alan
      Kirschbaum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
      his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    
                Alan KirschbaumAlan
                Kirschbaum
              Chief
                Financial Officer


February
      11, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR

SERVICES RENDERED BY CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP

FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 29, 2019 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2019

TASK

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT

ADMN Case Administration (Incl. Docket Updates and Case Calendar) 261.80 $96,502.00

ASST Use and Sale of Assets, Including 363 Sales 30.10 40,428.00

AUTO Automatic Stay 31.60 25,217.00

BARN Bar Date and Claims Noticing Matter 0.00 0.00

CASE General Case Strategy 377.80 331,661.50

CASH Financing / Cash Collateral 375.80 334,337.00

COMM Committee Matters 17.60 16,235.00

CRAV Cravath Retention and Fee Application 124.20 99,885.50

CRED Creditor Inquiries 13.70 14,900.00

DSSV Disclosure Statement / Solicitation / Voting Matters 3.00 2,880.00

ECUL Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases 0.00 0.00

FEEO Retention and Fee Applications of Non-Cravath Professionals 1.80 1,590.00

GOVR Corporate Governance and Securities Matters 1,043.20 1,021,078.00

HEAR Hearings and Court Matters 141.70 151,461.00

INVS Investigations 557.10 367,732.00

NONB Non-Bankruptcy Litigation 1,546.40 1,021,740.00

OCMS Other Contested Matters 30.70 23,136.00

OPRS Business Operations Matters 717.80 623,301.50

PLAN Plan of Reorganization / Plan Confirmation 0.00 0.00

PUBL Public Relations Strategy 90.80 105,074.00

REGS Regulatory & Legislative Matters 3,844.40 2,369,497.00

TRVL Non-Working Travel Time 406.80 156,657.00*

USTM U.S. Trustee Matters / Meetings / Communications / Reports 4.60 5,813.00

WILD Wildfire Claims Matters 712.20 541,549.00

TOTAL 10,333.10 $7,350,674.50

* - Non-Working Travel Time billed at 50% discount.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2645-2 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 15:04:13 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, Dennis P. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of Fusion-io, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Fusion-io, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 2, 2011 |  | /s/ DENNIS P. WOLF     
|                        |  | Dennis P. Wolf         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Oil and Gas Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dan Motsinger, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                  
| | -----------------
| | /s/ Dan Motsinger
| | Dan Motsinger    
| | CEO              



Date: July 16, 2009
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5076 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act to increase 

knowledge concerning, and improve services for, runaway 

and homeless youth who are victims of trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5076 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enhancing Services 

3 for Runaway and Homeless Victims of Youth Trafficking 

4 Act of 2014’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

6 The Runaway and Homeless Youth Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 5701 et seq.) is amended— 

8 (1) in section 343(b)(5)— 

9 (A) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘‘, se10 vere forms of trafficking in persons (as defined 

11 in section 103(9) of the Trafficking Victims 

12 Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9))), 

13 and sex trafficking (as defined in section 

14 103(10) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 7102(10)))’’ 

15 before the semicolon at the end; 

16 (B) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ‘‘, 

17 severe forms of trafficking in persons (as de18 fined in section 103(9) of the Trafficking Vic19 tims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 

20 7102(9))), and sex trafficking (as defined in 

21 section 103(10) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 

22 7102(10)))’’ after ‘‘assault’’; and 

23 (C) in subparagraph (C) by inserting ‘‘, in24 cluding such youth who are victims of traf25 ficking (as defined in section 103(15) of the 

26 Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5076 RFS 

1 U.S.C. 7102(15)))’’ before the semicolon at the 

2 end; and 

3 (2) in section 351(a) by striking ‘‘or sexual ex4 ploitation’’ and inserting ‘‘sexual exploitation, severe 

5 forms of trafficking in persons (as defined in section 

6 103(9) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 

7 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9))), or sex trafficking (as 

8 defined in section 103(10) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 

9 7102(10)))’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit








First Amendment to Warrant Agreement
This First Amendment to the Warrant Agreement (as defined below) (the “Amendment”), dated June 27, 2016, is between Tecogen Inc., a Delaware Corporation, located at 45 First Ave., Waltham, MA 02451 (the “Company”) and __________________, a sophisticated investor (the “Holder”). 
WHEREAS, pursuant to a subscription agreement, entered into by the Company and the Holder, dated December 28, 2015, the Company and the Holder also entered into a warrant agreement (the “Warrant Agreement”). 
WHEREAS, the parties now want to modify the expiration date of the Warrant Agreement. 
WHEREAS, all capitalized terms that are not defined herein have the meaning that was given to them in the Warrant Agreement. 
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for good and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder agree as follows: 
		
	I.
	Amendment to Warrant Agreement


		
	a.
	The term “Expiration Date” in the Warrant Agreement is amended to mean seven months from the date of Issuance. 


		
	II.
	Miscellaneous 


		
	a.
	Entire Agreement. The terms and conditions of this Amendment shall be incorporated by reference in the Warrant Agreement as though set forth in full in the Warrant Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Amendment and any other provision of the Warrant Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Amendment shall govern and control. Except to the extent specifically amended or superseded by the terms of this Amendment, all of the provisions of the Warrant Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Warrant Agreement, as modified by this Amendment, constitutes the complete agreement among the parties and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements, writings, communications or understandings of the parties with respect to the subject matter of the Warrant Agreement. 


		
	b.
	Severability. Should an provision of this Amendment be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be enforceable only if modified, or if any portion of this Amendment shall be held as unenforceable and thus stricken, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, the balance of which shall continue to be binding upon the parties with any such modification to become a part hereof and treated as through originally set forth in this Amendment. 


		
	c.
	Accredited Investor. The initial Holder of this Amendment to the Warrant Agreement represents that he is an “accredited investor” as defined in the rules and regulations under the Securities Act.


		
	d.
	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 






[Signatures Follow]















Tecogen Inc. 


By:__________________
Name:
Title:


Holder


By:____________________
Name:__________________
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Petro USA, Inc. formerly All State Properties Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Joseph C. Passalaqua, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 3 rd day of June 2022.

 

s/Joseph C. Passalaqua

Joseph C. Passalaqua

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Petro USA, Inc., and will be retained by Petro USA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.