alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 1 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1682 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:20:38 Page 9 of

9
Exhibit
32.1







Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Vision Acquisition III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti William Uusiheimala, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antti William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William Uusiheimala
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                December
      29, 2008
EXHIBIT C 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3927-3 Filed: 09/18/19 Entered: 09/18/19 13:48:35 Page 1

of 2
EXPENSE SUMMARY 

JULY 1, 2019 THROUGH JULY 31, 2019 

EXPENSES AMOUNTS

Computerized Research $0 

Meals $0 

Travel $0 

Transportation $11.73 

Printing and Duplication $13,172.10 

Transcription Services $1,591.15 

Telephone Conferencing $0 

Messenger $667.56 

Filing Fees $0 

Total Expenses Requested: $15,442.54 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3927-3 Filed: 09/18/19 Entered: 09/18/19 13:48:35 Page 2

of 2
#### In the Matter of Walter Dukes, Jr., Appellant, v Capitol Formation, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted November 6, 1995;

decided December 28, 1995

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from so *892much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed appellant’s appeal from that portion of the June 7, 1993 decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed the November 12, 1991 decision of the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge made upon stipulation, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that appellant is not a party aggrieved (CPLR 5511); appeal, insofar as taken from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed appellant’s appeal from that portion of the June 7, 1993 decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed the April 25, 1992 decision of the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and as affirmed the August 19, 1993 decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that that portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for reargument, etc., denied. *[See,*86 NY2d 810.]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Xenacare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bobby Story, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | /s/ Bobby Story        
| | Bobby Story            
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | April 15, 2008
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3847 Filed: 09/09/19 Entered: 09/09/19 15:44:23 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3847 Filed: 09/09/19 Entered: 09/09/19 15:44:23 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3847 Filed: 09/09/19 Entered: 09/09/19 15:44:23 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3847 Filed: 09/09/19 Entered: 09/09/19 15:44:23 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3847 Filed: 09/09/19 Entered: 09/09/19 15:44:23 Page 5 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2492 Filed: 06/12/19 Entered: 06/12/19 09:03:17 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2492 Filed: 06/12/19 Entered: 06/12/19 09:03:17 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2492 Filed: 06/12/19 Entered: 06/12/19 09:03:17 Page 3 of

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          22,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (507)
<INVENTORY>                                        623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,695
<PP&E>                                           1,192
<DEPRECIATION>                                     258
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,046
<OTHER-SE>                                     (25,094)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,594
<SALES>                                          4,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,725
<CGS>                                              685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    708
<INCOME-TAX>                                       269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5208 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5208

To make technical corrections to the National Parks and Recreation Act 
                    of 1978, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2014

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make technical corrections to the National Parks and Recreation Act 
                    of 1978, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PETERSBURG NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD LAND ACQUISITION.

    Section 313(a) of the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (16 
U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking ``May 1978.'' and inserting 
``May 1978, and in addition such lands located as the Secretary deems 
appropriate, not to exceed four acres.''.
                                 <all>
```
Converted by EDGARwiz


Michael T. Studer CPA P.C.

111 West Sunrise Highway, Second Floor East

Freeport, NY 11520

(516) 378-1000







Michael T. Studer

Certified Public Accountant







December 30, 2015




Mr. Marco Alfonsi, President

WRAPmail, Inc

445 NE 12th Avenue

Fort Lauderdale, Fl. 33301




Re: WRAP services




Dear Marco:




This letter confirms that the Firm is willing to accept 150,000 shares of WRAPmail, Inc. common stock in exchange for accounting services shown on the attached invoice. 




The shares may be issued in the name of Michael T. Studer Family Trust (EIN 11-6493853), 111 West Sunrise Highway, Second Floor East, Freeport, NY. 11520.







Very truly yours,







Michael T. Studer

President






























Michael T. Studer CPA P.C.

111 West Sunrise Highway, Second Floor East

Freeport, NY 11520

Phone: (516) 378-1000

Fax: (516) 546-6220




Michael T. Studer

Certified Public Accountant







December 30, 2015

WRAPmail, Inc

445 NE 12th Avenue

Fort Lauderdale, Fl. 33301










For professional services rendered in connection with assistance in the preparation of financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 (included in Form S-1 Registration Statement filed December 2, 2015)

$15,000
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-1281-000]


Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC; Notice of Filing

May 20, 2010.
    Take notice that on May 19, 2010, Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC 
filed an application requesting the Commission to grant it a limited 
waiver of PJM Interconnection, LLC, and time to post deferred security 
under section 212.4(c) and Attachment O, section 6.5 of the PJM Open 
Access Transmission Tariff, PJM OATT 212.4(c), Att. O 6.5 (the pro 
forma ISA).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ebadaeb9a8a4858782858eb89e9b9b84999fab8d8e9988c58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82c4c7d0c1cdeceeebece7d1f7f2f2edf0f6c2e4e7f0e1ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 21, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-12854 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-34 (l)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

* Ernst & Young LLP
  220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400
  Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

* Phone: (612) 343-1000
  www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S.
Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i),
1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(i) through 1122 (d)(2)(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i)
through 1122 (d)(3)(iv), and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them
with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected
transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

February 26, 2007

A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Petro USA, Inc. formerly All State Properties Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended September 30, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Joseph C. Passalaqua, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 3 rd day of June 2022..

 

s/Joseph C. Passalaqua

Joseph C. Passalaqua

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Petro USA, Inc., and will be retained by Petro USA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-4901



# 

D ESMOND S ENTELLD AILEY ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge.

(CR-00-42) Submitted: June 26, 2002 Decided: August 23, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Haakon Thorsen, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Desmond Dailey appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine and one count of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (West 1999 & Supp. 2002). Dailey claims that the Government breached an oral plea agreement by failing to administer a polygraph test to confirm his limited role in the conspiracy. Because he did not object below, Dailey’s claim is reviewed for plain error only. United States v. McQueen , 108 F.3d 64, 65-66 (4thCir. 1997). Although not favored, oral plea agreements are enforceable. United States v. Iaquinta , 719 F.2d 83, 84 n.2 (4th Cir. 1983). A government promise that is part of the inducement for a guilty plea must be fulfilled. Santobello v. New York , 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971). The government’s breach of such a promise violates due process. United States v. Martin , 25 F.3d 211, 217 (4th Cir. 1994). The interpretation of a plea agreement is "guided by contract law, and parties to the agreement should receive the benefit of their bargain." McQueen , 108 F.3d at 66. In McQueen , the transcript of the guiltyplea hearing established that the government had made an oral promise to recommend that the defendant receive a sentence of no morethan 63 months and to recommend that he receive a two-level adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. At sentencing, the government failed to mention the terms of the oral plea agreement. We found thatthe government’s breach constituted plain error requiring that McQueen’s sentence be vacated and the case remanded for specific performance of the agreement. Id. at 65.Here, by contrast, we find no evidence in the record to support Dailey’s claim that his guilty plea was induced by the Government’spromise to administer a polygraph. Although a polygraph examination was mentioned at Dailey’s sentencing hearing, it was not in thecontext of an agreement or promise to induce his guilty plea. Accordingly, we conclude that Dailey cannot show a breach of any plea agreement and therefore affirm his sentence. We dispense with oral 2 U NITED S TATES v. D AILEYargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. D AILEY
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5254 

To appropriately limit the authority to award bonuses to employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2014 

Ms. SINEMA (for herself and Mr. BENISHEK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To appropriately limit the authority to award bonuses to 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Wasteful Bonuses 

5 in Department of Veterans Affairs Act of 2014’’ or the 

6 ‘‘VA Bonus Accountability Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. BONUSES. 

8 (a) ADVERSE FINDINGS AND EMPLOYEES UNDER IN9 VESTIGATION.—Chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, 

10 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5254 IH

1 ‘‘Subchapter IV—Limitations on Bonus 

2 Authority 

3 ‘‘SEC. 4531. CERTAIN FORMS OF MISCONDUCT. 

4 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

5 ‘‘(1) the term ‘adverse finding’ relating to an 

6 employee means a determination that the conduct of 

7 the employee— 

8 ‘‘(A) violated a policy of the agency for 

9 which the employee may be removed or sus10 pended; or 

11 ‘‘(B) violated a law for which the employee 

12 may be imprisoned of more than 1 year; 

13 ‘‘(2) the term ‘agency’ has the meaning given 

14 that term under section 551; and 

15 ‘‘(3) the term ‘bonus’ means any bonus or cash 

16 award, including— 

17 ‘‘(A) an award under this chapter; 

18 ‘‘(B) an award under section 5384; and 

19 ‘‘(C) a retention bonus under section 5754. 

20 ‘‘(b) ADVERSE FINDINGS.— 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The head of an agency 

22 shall not award a bonus to an employee of the agen23 cy until 5 years after the end of the fiscal year in 

24 which the Inspector General or another senior ethics 

25 official of the agency or the Comptroller General of 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5254 IH

1 the United States makes an adverse finding relating 

2 to the employee. 

3 ‘‘(2) PREVIOUSLY AWARDED BONUSES.—If the 

4 Inspector General or another senior ethics official of 

5 the agency or the Comptroller General of the United 

6 States makes an adverse finding relating to an em7 ployee, the head of the agency employing the em8 ployee, after notice and an opportunity for a hear9 ing, shall issue an order directing the employee to 

10 repay the amount of any bonus awarded to the em11 ployee during the year during which the adverse 

12 finding is made.’’. 

13 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

14 The table of sections for chapter 45 of title 5, United 

15 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol16 lowing: 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER IV—LIMITATIONS ON BONUS AUTHORITY

‘‘4531. Certain forms of misconduct.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS