alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5041 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling up to $5,000,000 

for information on the kidnapping and murder of Naftali Fraenkel, 

a dual United States-Israeli citizen, that began on June 12, 2014. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to offer rewards totaling 

up to $5,000,000 for information on the kidnapping and 

murder of Naftali Fraenkel, a dual United States-Israeli 

citizen, that began on June 12, 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REWARDS AUTHORIZED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Rewards 

5 for Justice program authorized under section 36(b) of the 

6 State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 

7 U.S.C. 2708(b)), the Secretary of State shall offer a re8 ward to any individual who furnishes information leading 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5041 IH

1 to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual 

2 for committing, conspiring or attempting to commit, or 

3 aiding or abetting in the commission of the kidnapping 

4 and murder of Naftali Fraenkel. 

5 (b) LIMIT ON TOTAL REWARDS.—The total amount 

6 of rewards offered under subsection (a) may not exceed 

7 $5,000,000. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4958 

To provide monetary awards to any individual who provides information 

pertaining to the electronic communications sent by Lois Lerner during 

her employment at the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2014 

Mr. FLORES (for himself and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide monetary awards to any individual who provides 

information pertaining to the electronic communications 

sent by Lois Lerner during her employment at the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Identify and Recover 

5 Sent E-Mails Act’’. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4958 IH

1 SEC. 2. AWARDS IN CONNECTION WITH LOIS LERNER IRS E2 MAILS. 

3 (a) RECOVERY OF E-MAILS.—Upon receipt of certifi4 cation from Congress that an individual or group of indi5 viduals has retrieved and submitted to Congress the elec6 tronic communications sent by Lois Lerner during her em7 ployment with the Internal Revenue Service, the Secretary 

8 of the Treasury shall pay a cash award of $1,000,000 to 

9 such individual or group of individuals. 

10 (b) DESTRUCTION OF E-MAILS.—Upon receipt of cer11 tification from the Attorney General that an individual or 

12 group of individuals has provided pertinent information 

13 sufficient for prosecution of the individuals involved in ille14 gal activities (if any) with respect to the destruction of 

15 the electronic communications sent by Lois Lerner during 

16 her employment with the Internal Revenue Service, the 

17 Secretary of the Treasury shall pay a cash award of 

18 $500,000 to any such individual or group of individuals. 

19 (c) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—The award amounts au20 thorized under this section shall be derived from the unob21 ligated amounts available for fiscal year 2014 in Public 

22 Law 113–76 under the heading ‘‘Department of the 

23 Treasury—Internal Revenue Service—Taxpayer Serv24 ices’’. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4958 IH

1 SEC. 3. OBLIGATION LIMITATION ON IRS EMPLOYEE SALA2 RIES UNTIL LOIS LERNER IRS E-MAILS ARE 

3 RECOVERED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Of the amounts made available in 

5 Public Law 113–76 for the salaries for employees of the 

6 Internal Revenue Service, not more than 80 percent of 

7 such funds may be obligated during fiscal year 2014 until 

8 the electronic communications sent by Lois Lerner during 

9 her employment with the Internal Revenue Service have 

10 been recovered and submitted to Congress. 

11 (b) APPLICATION.—The limitation provided in sub12 section (a) shall cease to apply on the date that Congress 

13 certifies to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the 

14 Director of the Office of Personnel Management that such 

15 e-mails have been recovered. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


MIDSOUTH BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                                 EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE  (Unaudited)
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001


                                       Third Quarter     Third Quarter     Year-to-Date      Year-to-Date
                                       September 30,     September 30,     September 30,     September 30,
BASIC                                      2002              2001              2002              2001
                                       _____________     _____________     _____________     _____________
<S>                                    <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Earnings:
    Income applicable to common stock    $1,241,673          $783,127        $3,147,049        $1,995,390
                                       ============      ============      ============      ============

Shares:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding           2,883,142         2,734,556         2,883,142         2,539,255
                                       ============      ============      ============      ============

Earnings per common share:
    Income applicable to common stock         $0.43             $0.29             $1.09             $0.79
                                       ============      ============      ============      ============


DILUTED

Earnings:
    Net income                           $1,241,673          $783,127        $3,147,049        $2,048,141
                                       ============      ============      ============      ============

Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding             2,883,142         2,734,556         2,883,142         2,539,255

    Assuming exercise of options,
      reduced by the number of
      shares which could have
      been purchased with the
      proceeds from exercise of
      such options at the average
      issue price                            63,911            52,586            61,196            48,033

    Assuming conversion of
      preferred stock at a
      conversion rate of 1 to 2                   -           159,943                 -           275,771
                                       ____________      ____________      ____________      ____________
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding,
      as adjusted                         2,947,053         2,947,085         2,944,338         2,863,059
                                       ============      ============      ============      ============


Fully diluted earnings per common
  share                                       $0.42             $0.27             $1.07             $0.72
                                       ============      ============      ============      ============



</TABLE>
#### STATE v. EMMA MITCHELL.

(Filed 28 February, 1945.)

Criminal Law § 68a—

Where the court enters judgment of not guilty, after a purported special verdict, on the conclusion that the statute, on which the criminal prosecution was based, is unconstitutional, the State has no right of appeal under *a.*S., 15-179.

Appeal by the State from *Pless, J.,'*at December Term, 1944, of BuNcombe. Appeal dismissed.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes and Moody for the State.*

*Sanford W. Brown for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant was charged with practicing palmistry for compensation, in violation of ch. 51, Public-Local Laws 1927. On what purported to be a special verdict, judgment was rendered that the defendant was not guilty on the ground that the enactment of statute under which she was charged was prohibited by Art. II, sec. 29, of the Constitution. From this judgment the State undertook to appeal.

It is apparent that the judgment was based, not on the facts found, but upon the court’s conclusion that the statute itself was unconstitutional. This ruling the court was competent to make at any time. The special verdict therefore was without significance, and the State’s appeal was not authorized by the enabling statute, G. S., 15-179, as now in force. The appeal will be dismissed. *S. v. Todd,*224 N. C., 776.

Appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Crim. Action No. 04-00122-1 (CKK)

 

ORDER

(December 2, 2020)

This case comes before the Court upon the receipt of a [39] Report and Recommendation 

from Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey, dated November 12, 2020. No objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been received by the Court.

Accordingly, it is this 2nd day of December, 2020,

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 39, is hereby ADOPTED,

and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Tyrone V. Carter’s supervised release shall be 

revoked and he shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 18 months to run concurrent with 

his current term of imprisonment, with no additional period of supervised release to follow his 

reincarceration, and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that by December 10, 2020, the parties shall indicate by filing a 

Notice with this Court as to whether they agree to proceed with sentencing via videoteleconference 

in light of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic and health and safety concerns. 

____________/s/__________________

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 v.

TYRONE V . CARTER,

 Defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10587

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

BRIAN ANTHONY ADAMS,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:16-CR-246-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brian Adams has 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 15, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10587 Document: 00514795227 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2019
No. 18-10587

2

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Adams has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

There is a clerical error in the judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36. 

Specifically, as to the conviction of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a 

drug trafficking crime, the judgment mistakenly referred to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c)(1)(C)(i) as the applicable statute instead of the correct statute, 

§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i). Subsection (c)(1)(C)(i) provides for a 25-year mandatory 

minimum sentence for a second or subsequent § 924(c) offense, while 

§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i) provides for a five-year mandatory minimum.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for the limited purpose of 

correction of the clerical error to reflect that Adams was sentenced under 

§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i). See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36. 

 Case: 18-10587 Document: 00514795227 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/15/2019
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1783 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 14:42:18 Page 1 of

5
Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1783 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 14:42:18 Page 2 of

5
Exhibit A

Notice Parties Service List

Served via First Class Mail

NAME ADDRESS 1 ADDRESS 2 CITY ST

Weil Gotshal and Manges, LLP Attn: Richard W. Slack 767 Fifth Avenue New York NY 

Weil Gotshal and Manges, LLP Attn: Stephen Karotkin 767 Fifth Avenue New York NY 

In re:  PG&E Corporation, et al.Case No. 19‐30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1783 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 14:42:18 Page 

5
Exhibit B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1783 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 14:42:18 Page 4 of

5
Form TRANSC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Northern District of California

In re Debtor(s):

PG&E Corporation

Case No.: 19−30088 DM 11

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT

AND DEADLINES RELATED TO RESTRICTION AND REDACTION

A transcript of the proceeding held on April 23, 2019 was filed on April 24, 2019. The following deadlines apply:

The parties have until Wednesday, May 1, 2019 to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this

transcript. The deadline for filing a request for redaction is Wednesday, May 15, 2019.

If a request for redaction is filed, the redacted transcript is due Tuesday, May 28, 2019.

If no such notice is filed, the transcript may be made available for remote electronic access upon expiration of the

restriction period, which is Tuesday, July 23, 2019, unless extended by court order.

To review the transcript for redaction purposes, you may purchase a copy from the transcriber,

Jason Gottlieb

Attn: Jason Gottlieb, Dir. of Tran. Ops.

7227 N 16th St. #207

Phoenix, AZ 85020

or you may view the document at the clerk's office public terminal.

Dated: 4/29/19 For the Court:

Edward J. Emmons

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

SRF 32576`

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1783 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 14:42:18 Page 5 of

5
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5062 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to specify that 
privilege and confidentiality are maintained when information is shared 
    by certain nondepository covered persons with Federal and State 
             financial regulators, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Examination and Supervisory 
Privilege Parity Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. PRIVILEGE OF INFORMATION SHARED BY CERTAIN NONDEPOSITORY 
              COVERED PERSONS.

    Section 1024(b)(3) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5514(b)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``regulators and the State bank regulatory 
        authorities'' and inserting ``regulators, the State bank 
        regulatory authorities, and the State agencies that licence, 
        supervise, or examine the offering of consumer financial 
        products or services''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``The sharing of 
        information with such regulators, authorities, and agencies 
        shall not be construed as waiving, destroying, or otherwise 
        affecting any privilege or confidentiality such person may 
        claim with respect to such information under Federal or State 
        law as to any person or entity other than such Bureau, agency, 
        supervisor, or authority.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to specify that 
privilege and confidentiality are maintained when information is shared 
    by certain nondepository covered persons with Federal and State 
             financial regulators, and for other purposes.
```
EXHIBIT 10.2



 


AMENDMENT
NO 1 to STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


Dated
as of June 24, 2016


 


This
Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of the date first set forth above
by and between Tarek Kirschen (“Seller”), South Centre, Inc. (“Purchaser”), and Carolco Pictures, Inc.,
a Florida corporation (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
the parties hereto are the parties to that certain Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 22, 2016 (the “Original Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS,
the parties hereto desire to amend the Original Agreement as set forth herein to provide for the orderly completion of the transactions
contemplated herein; 


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, promises and representations set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.The
Original Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 


 


(a)The
words “5:00 p.m. Eastern time on June 24, 2016” in Section 17.2 of the Original Agreement are hereby amended to read
“12:00 noon Eastern time on June 27, 2016”.


 


(b)The
word “5:00 p.m.” in Section 17.3 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to read “12:00 noon”. 


 


2.The
parties acknowledge that all of the conditions precedent to the Closing have been satisfied as of the date hereof, other than
the receipt by Purchaser of evidence of the payment by Seller of $500.00 to the Company in return for the issuance to Seller of
the Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree that their respective obligations to proceed to the Closing shall
remain subject to the conditions precedent to the Closing remaining satisfied as of the date and time of the Closing. 


 


3.Other
than as amended herein, the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


4.This
Amendment shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida, without giving effect
to principles of conflicts of law.


 


5.This
Amendment may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts and by any reliable electronic means such as, but not limited
to, a photocopy, electronically scanned or facsimile, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[Signatures
appear on following page]


 




    	 	 	 



     

    


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


	 	Carolco
    Pictures, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Tarek Kirschen 
	 	Name:
    	Tarek
    Kirschen
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 		/s/
    Tarek Kirschen
	 		Tarek
    Kirschen
	 	 	 
	 	South
    Centre, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 	/s/
    David Cohen
	 	Name:
    	David
    Cohen
	 	Title:
    	Chief
    Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 of TLC Vision Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
P. Rasche, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                           Date: April 21, 2005

                           /s/ Steven P. Rasche
                           --------------------------
                           Steven P. Rasche
                           Chief Financial Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Edwyn Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court</p><p>of the City of New York, New York County (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered November 23, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of violating Public Health Law ยง 229, and imposing sentence.</p><br><b>Per Curiam</b>.<p>Judgment of conviction (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered November 23, 2015, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and fine, if paid, remitted.</p><p>The notably terse and ambiguous plea colloquy underlying defendant's Summons Part conviction fails to establish that his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. It is unclear as to the exact charge to which defendant pleaded guilty; the court did not address defendant during the plea proceeding and defendant did not speak; nor was defendant advised of any constitutional rights he was waiving (<i>see People v Moore</i>, 24 NY3d 1030 [2014]). Given the relatively minor nature of the infraction here charged, we dismiss the accusatory instrument in lieu of remanding the matter (<i>see People v Burwell</i>, 53 NY2d 849, 851 [1981]).</p><p>In light of our disposition, we reach no other issues. </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <p>Decision Date: September 15, 2017</p><br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>