Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices 29975 

dehydration, plastic embedding and 

thin-sectioning of biological materials. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No 

instruments of same general category are 

manufactured in the United States. 

Application accepted by Commissioner 

of Customs: April 30, 2010. 

Docket Number: 10–012. Applicant: 

California Institute of Technology, 1200 

E. California Blvd., M/C 127–72, 

Pasadena, CA 91125. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, Czech Republic. Intended 

Use: The instrument will be used to 

improve researchers’ understanding of 

the structural dynamics of materials like 

graphite, as well as ultrafast structural 

changes over time in microscopy. 

Techniques used with the instrument 

include imaging, both in real space and 

using diffraction. Imaging is done using 

light as opposed to thermal heating or 

field ionization. Justification for DutyFree Entry: There are no domestic 

manufacturers of this type of electron 

microscope. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: May 5, 2010. 

Docket Number: 10–013. Applicant: 

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 4000 

Jones Bridge Road, Chevy Chase, MD 

20815. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: The instrument 

will be used to examine portions of 

vertebrate and invertebrate organisms 

embedded in plastic resins and cut into 

thin sections mounted on support grids 

for examination. The objective is to 

examine, at high resolution, the 

ultrastructural organization of complex 

biological structures to help elucidate 

function. The instrument can be used 

for 2D and 3D imaging of stained or 

even unstained, low-contrast samples. 

The instrument also allows for 

observation and analyses of samples at 

both room and liquid-nitrogen 

temperature. Justification for Duty-Free 

Entry: There are no domestic 

manufacturers of this type of electron 

microscope. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: May 12, 

2010. 

Docket Number: 10–014. Applicant: 

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 4000 

Jones Bridge Road, Chevy Chase, MD 

20815. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: The instrument 

will be used to examine portions of 

vertebrate and invertebrate organisms 

embedded in plastic resins and cut into 

thin sections mounted on support grids 

for examination. The objective is to 

examine, at high resolution, the 

ultrastructural organization of complex 

biological structures to help elucidate 

function. The instrument can be used 

for 2D and 3D imaging of stained or 

even unstained, low-contrast samples. 

The instrument also allows for 

observation and analyses of samples at 

both room and liquid-nitrogen 

temperature. Justification for Duty-Free 

Entry: There are no domestic 

manufacturers of this type of electron 

microscope. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: May 14, 

2010. 

Docket Number: 10–016. Applicant: 

United States Geological Survey, 6th 

Ave. & Kipling St., P.O. Box 25046, 

MS973, Denver Federal Center, Building 

20, Denver, CO 80225. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, Czech Republic. Intended 

Use: The instrument will be used for the 

microanalysis of rocks, minerals and 

other particulate matter. Analyses of the 

morphology, surface textures, grain 

boundaries, and other properties of the 

materials investigated include the use of 

chemical composition and 

crystallographic orientation and strain. 

The low vacuum and low voltage 

features of the instrument allows for the 

viewing of hydrated and un-coated 

samples with minimal sample 

degradation or alteration. The advantage 

of this instrument is that it can operate 

at high vacuum and high acceleration 

voltages as well as atmospheric 

pressures and/or low accelerating 

voltages while still maintaining high 

resolution and high beam currents. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There 

are no domestic manufacturers of this 

type of electron microscope. 

Application accepted by Commissioner 

of Customs: May 18, 2010. 

Docket Number: 10–017. Applicant: 

University of Massachusetts Medical 

School, Department of Cell Biology, Rm. 

S7–210, 55 Lake Avenue North, 

Worcester, MA 01655. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, Czech Republic. Intended 

Use: The instrument will enable the 

study of tissue cell structures at high 

resolution, the recording of images on 

the Eagle CCD camera, and the 

observation of cryo-fixed specimens at 

low temperatures. Justification for DutyFree Entry: There are no domestic 

manufacturers of this type of electron 

microscope. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: May 12, 

2010. 

Docket Number: 10–018. Applicant: 

Texas Tech University, Department of 

Mechanical Engineering, 7th Street and 

Boston Ave., Lubbock, TX 79409–1021. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: Japanese Electron-Optics, 

Limited (JEOL), Japan. Intended Use: 

The instrument will be used to probe 

the crystalline structure of materials at 

a magnification beyond that required to 

image dislocation behavior of fully 

crystalline nanostructured metals. The 

instrument will provide detailed surface 

structures and faceting information. 

Justification for Duty-Free Entry: No 

instruments of same general category are 

manufactured in the United States. 

Application accepted by Commissioner 

of Customs: May 17, 2010. 

Docket Number: 10–020. Applicant: 

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 4000 

Jones Bridge Road, Chevy Chase, MD 

20815. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech 

Republic. Intended Use: The instrument 

will be used to examine portions of 

vertebrate and invertebrate organisms 

embedded in plastic resins and cut into 

thin sections mounted on support grids 

for examination. The objective is to 

examine, at high resolution, the 

ultrastructural organization of complex 

biological structures to help elucidate 

function. The instrument can be used 

for 2D and 3D imaging of stained or 

even unstained, low-contrast samples. 

The instrument also allows for 

observation and analyses of samples at 

both room and liquid-nitrogen 

temperature. Justification for Duty-Free 

Entry: There are no domestic 

manufacturers of this type of electron 

microscope. Application accepted by 

Commissioner of Customs: May 12, 

2010. 

Dated: May 24, 2010. 

Christopher Cassel, 

Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12962 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1679] 

Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 272; 

Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Lehigh Valley Economic 

Development Corporation, grantee of 

Foreign-Trade Zone 272, submitted an 

application to the Board for authority to 

expand FTZ 272 to include a site in 

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, adjacent to 

the Philadelphia Customs and Border 

Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 37– 

2009, filed 9/9/2009); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment has been given in the Federal 

Register (74 FR 47920–47921, 

September 18, 2009) and the application 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
29976 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices 

has been processed pursuant to the FTZ 

Act and the Board’s regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to expand FTZ 272 is 

approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.28, and to the Board’s 

standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 

the overall general-purpose zone 

project, and further subject to a sunset 

provision that would terminate 

authority on May 31, 2017 for Site 9 if 

no activity has occurred under FTZ 

procedures before that date. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of 

May 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

Attest: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12958 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–826] 

Certain Cut–to–Length Carbon–Quality 

Steel Plate Products From Italy: 

Extension of the Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 28, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dmitry Vladimirov, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0665. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 29, 2010, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain cut– 

to-length carbon–quality steel plate 

products from Italy. See Certain Cut–to– 

Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 

Products From Italy: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 4779 (January 29, 2010). 

The review covers the period February 

1, 2008, through January 31, 2009. The 

final results of this administrative 

review were originally due no later than 

May 29, 2010. As explained in the 

memorandum from the Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, the Department has 

exercised its discretion to toll deadlines 

for the duration of the closure of the 

Federal Government from February 5 

through February 12, 2010. Thus, the 

deadline for the final results of this 

administrative review has been 

extended by seven days, until June 5, 

2010. See Memorandum to the Record 

from Ronald Lorentzen, DAS for Import 

Administration, regarding ‘‘Tolling of 

Administrative Deadlines As a Result of 

the Government Closure During the 

Recent Snowstorm,’’ dated February 12, 

2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to issue the final results 

of an administrative review within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are published. 

However, if it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time limit for the final results up to 180 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are published. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete this review by 

June 5, 2010, because the Department 

requires additional time to consider the 

extensive comments submitted by the 

interested parties in relation to the 

preliminary results of this review. 

Consequently, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the 

Department is extending the time limit 

for completion of the final results of this 

administrative review by 60 days to 

August 4, 2010. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: May 20, 2010. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12963 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) has received requests 

to conduct administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with April 

anniversary dates. In accordance with 

the Department’s regulations, we are 

initiating those administrative reviews. 

DATES: Effective Date: May 28, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4697. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with April 

anniversary dates. 

Change to the Deadlines for NoShipment Letters and Separate Rate 

Certifications 

Effective with this Federal Register 

notice, the Department is changing the 

deadline for submission of No-Shipment 

Letters and Separate Rate Certifications 

from 30-days after initiation to 60-days 

after initiation, as indicated in the 

relevant sections of this Federal 

Register notice. The Department 

requires that a company under review, 

which currently has a separate rate, 

submit either a No-Shipment Letter or a 

Separate Rate Certification, as relevant 

to the company’s situation, as described 

in the relevant sections of this Federal 

Register notice, below. If a company 

under review that currently has a 

separate rate fails to submit either a NoShipment Letter, a Separate Rate 

Certification, or a Separate Rate 

Application (as appropriate) for this 

POR, the company will not have 

demonstrated its eligibility to retain its 

separate rate status and will be 

considered to be part of the China-wide 

entity for purposes of this 

administrative review. The 

Department’s practice remains 

unchanged for companies that do not 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES