alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
*Unaudited interim statements as of and for the six months ended 
December 31,1996
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          26,270
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    276,003
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,151,231
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,148,175
<LOANS>                                      5,067,558
<ALLOWANCE>                                     50,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,868,213
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,421,433
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,080,111
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             95,922
<LONG-TERM>                                    876,025
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           143
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,868,213
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                200,801
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               49,732
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               250,533
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             111,074
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167,944
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           82,589
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,766
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 89,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,278
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (583)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.56
<LOANS-NON>                                     41,413
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                12,113
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                49,278
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,185
<RECOVERIES>                                       691
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               50,324
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            11,733
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         38,591
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Manojkumar D. Patel (Admitted as Manoj Kumar Dahyabhia Patel), a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted December 11,1995;

decided December 28, 1995

Appeal, insofar as taken from the October 16, 1990 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously taken an appeal to this Court (83 NY2d 903) from the same Appellate Division order from which his appeal is currently taken; appeal, insofar as taken from the April 6,1995 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, *sua sponte,*upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Judge Smith taking no part.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	RELEASE: U.S. Forces prepare to support foreign Hurricane Irma relief in Caribbean
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">RELEASE: U.S. Forces prepare to support foreign Hurricane Irma relief in Caribbean</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Sept. 12, 2017</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text">U.S. Southern Command Public Affairs , </span>
    <p>Sept. 12, 2017 — SOTO CANO AIR BASE, Honduras -- Over 300 U.S. service members temporarily based in Honduras are poised to respond to Hurricane Irma in the eastern Caribbean Sea, at the request of the U.S. Agency for International Development - Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance.</p>
<p>Joint Task Force - Leeward Islands (JTF-LI), composed of elements from Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force - Southern Command, Joint Task Force - Bravo and elements of other Southern Command components will provide humanitarian assistance / disaster relief support to the island of St. Martin. </p>
<p>USAID/OFDA requested DoD support to relief efforts after the island’s infrastructure sustained heavy damage from Hurricane Irma.</p>
<p>“The goal of our efforts in St. Martin is straightforward,” said Marine Corps Col. Michael Samarov, commander of JTF-LI. “We want to save lives and ease human suffering, and also augment civilian emergency response capabilities until our efforts are no longer necessary.”</p>
<p>JTF-LI is equipped with several disaster relief capabilities, including command and control, humanitarian assessment, water production and helicopter transportation.</p>
<p>“Our thoughts and prayers are with those who have suffered loss during this time,” said Samarov. “We are honored to help in any way we can.”<br />
For more information on JTF-LI, please contact the following individuals: </p>
<p>Joint Task Force - Leeward Island Public Affairs Officer<br />
Capt. Jeremy Croft<br />
Email: jeremy.croft@usmc.mil<br />
Phone: +504-3163-8474</p>
<p>U.S. Southern Command Forward Public Affairs Officer<br />
Maj. Joost Verduyn<br />
Email: joost.verduyn.1@us.af.mil<br />
Phone: 520-202-8998</p><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
#### Mary McLean Ludlow, Appellant, v. The Rector, Church Wardens and Vestrymen of Saint John’s Church, in the Town of Islip, New York, Respondents.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ. '
Exhibit 99.1


			   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, C.R.
Cloutier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
that:

	(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

	(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



________________________
C.R. Cloutier
Chief Executive Officer
August ____, 2002
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2274

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Sherri Beth Forrest, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 6, 2009 

Filed: October 13, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sherri Forrest challenges the 57-month sentence the district court1

 imposed after

she pleaded guilty to a drug crime. Her counsel has filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he seeks permission to withdraw, arguing

that Forrest’s within-Guidelines-range sentence is unreasonable.

We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case. See United States v. Andis, 333

F.3d 886, 889-90 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (court will enforce appeal waiver in plea

1

The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.
agreement when appeal falls within scope of waiver, both waiver and plea agreement

were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and enforcing waiver would not result

in miscarriage of justice). This appeal falls within the scope of the waiver contained

in Forrest’s plea agreement, waiving the right to appeal any sentence at or below 168

months; the record shows the requisite knowledge and voluntariness; and we see

nothing to suggest that a miscarriage of justice would result by enforcing the appeal

waiver, see United States v. Toothman, 543 F.3d 967, 970 (8th Cir. 2008) (withinGuidelines-range sentence is presumptively reasonable on appeal).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition that counsel

inform appellant about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for

certiorari, and we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                    OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                 21,115
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           8,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            (670)
<INVENTORY>                                                               620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       37,829
<PP&E>                                                                  2,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         44,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  14,091
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                                    7
<OTHER-SE>                                                             24,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           44,049
<SALES>                                                                 3,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        6,748
<CGS>                                                                     348
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           1,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       10,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         (50)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       (4,995)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          (4,546)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (449)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (.06)
        

</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 24, 2011

p1017 

# Order

October 24, 2011

143280

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTR ATOR, ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 143280 ADB: 09-000059-GA RONALD G. KRAFT, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not pe rsuaded that the questions pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Mary E. Bellotte, Respondent, v. George A. Bellotte, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Hirschherg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred.
#### J. L. HAMME v. R. B. LINEBERGER.

(Filed 20 August, 1930.)

Attorney and Client D a — Attorney fully discharging all duties he is employed to perform is entitled to recover fee therefor.

Where an attorney is employed to institute an action, and the action has been instituted and successfully prosecuted, and the attorney has fully discharged all duties he was employed to perform, he is entitled to recover his fee therefor.

Civil actioN, before *Harding, J.,*at December Civil Term, 1929, of GrASTON.

*J. L. Hamme for plaintiff.*

*H. R. Warren for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

It is admitted that the plaintiff, an attorney at law, was employed, by the defendant to institute an action for damages to property caused by the diversion and contamination of water. It is further admitted that the action was brought and the trial judge finds as a fact that the defendant agreed to pay plaintiff for his services a sum of money equal to one-third of the recovery. It is further found as a fact that the defendant recovered $6,000.

The said judgment was apparently entered by consent.

The defendant resists payment upon the ground that he has not collected the judgment, because he was required to sign an easement, .and his wife will not join in such conveyance.

. Upon the record, as presented, the plaintiff has fully discharged all duties that he was employed to perform and is therefore entitled to recover.

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 102 (Thursday, May 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12544]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for the OS ARRA: Enhancing Registries 
for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness (RO 1) 
applications are to be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. These 
discussions are likely to reveal personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the applications. This information is 
exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.

    SEP Meeting on: OS ARRA: Enhancing Registries for Quality 
Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness (R01).
    Dates: June 18, 2010. (Open on June 18 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting.)
    Place: Crowne Plaza Hotel, 3 Research Court, Conference Room 
TBD, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: May 13, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-12544 Filed 5-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
#### George Kimmerle, Respondent, v. The Carey Printing Company, Appellant.

Motion denied.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of American Shared Hospital Services for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007(the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code.     Ernest A. Bates, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer and Craig K. Tagawa, the Chief FinancialOfficer of American Shared Hospital Services, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:     1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of American Shared Hospital Services.November 14, 2007       /s/ Ernest A. Bates, M.D. Ernest A. Bates, M.D.    Chief Executive Officer         /s/ Craig K. Tagawa Craig K. Tagawa    Chief Financial Officer  
18
Exhibit 10.1

 

July 5, 2016

 

DELIVERED

 

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

 

Thompson Creek Metals Company Inc. (the “Company”)
 26 West Dry Creek Circle, Suite 810
 Littleton, Colorado 80120
 USA

 

Dear Sirs/Madams:

 

Re:                             Section 5.1(l)(ii)

 

Reference is made to the arrangement agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of July 5, 2016, between the Company and Centerra Gold Inc. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.

 

For the purposes of Section 5.1(l)(ii) of the Agreement, references to “Purchaser Material Adverse Effect” shall be read as excluding clause (h) of the definition of “Purchaser Material Adverse Effect”.

 

[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]

 











 

DATED this 5th day of July, 2016.

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/ Scott G. Perry
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name: Scott G. Perry
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:    Chief   Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Frank H. Herbert
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name: Frank H. Herbert
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:    President
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

 

Accepted, acknowledged and agreed to on this 5th day of July, 2016.

 

 

	
By:
    	
/s/ Jacques Perron
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name: Jacques Perron
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:    President   and Chief Executive Officer
#### Leopold Peck, Respondent, v. John H. McCarty, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed on opinion of

Beach, J.,

in court below, with costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Crim. Action No. 04

- 00 122

- 1 (CKK)

ORDER

( Dece mber 2 , 20 20 )

This case comes before the Court upon the receipt of a [ 39 ] Report and Recommendation

from Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey , dated November 12 , 20 2 0 . No objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been rece ived by the Court.

Accordingly, it is this 2nd day of December , 20 20

,

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation , ECF No. 39

, is hereby ADOPTED

,

and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Tyrone V. Carter ’ s super vis ed release sh all be

revoked and he shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 18 months to run concurrent with

his current term of imprisonment, with no additional period of supervised relea se to follow his

reincarceration , and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that by December 1 0, 2020, the parties shall indicate by filing a

Notice with this Court as to whether the y agree to proceed with sentenc ing via video tele con ference

in light of the ongoing C o vid

- 19 pandemic and health and safety con cerns.

____________/s/__________________

COLLEEN KOLLAR

- KOTELLY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

TYRONE V . CARTER

,

Defendant.