alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8574

RALPH ANTHONY JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. LARRY W. POWERS, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03627-PMD)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ralph Anthony Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Johnson that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Johnson failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Johnson has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000726

13-AUG-2013

10:35 AM
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2658

To suspend temporarily the duty on machines, and their parts, for use

in the manufacture of digital versatile discs (DVDs).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25, 2000

Mr. COVERDELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on machines, and their

parts, for use in the manufacture of digital versatile

discs (DVDs).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:
2

•S 2658 IS

‘‘ 9902.84.16 Bonding machines, whether

imported as an

entirety, or in

components, or

parts thereof, for

use in the manufacture of digital

versatile discs

(DVDs) (provided for in subheading

8479.89.97) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/03 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Sarah G. Smith, Appellant, v. John B. Smith, Respondent.

Judgment, in so far as it grants a decree in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, reversed, and that portion thereof refusing a decree in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant affirmed, without costs to either party.—

*Mem.*by

Herrick, J.:

I concur in the conclusion arrived at by the referee that the evidence in this case is not sufficient to warrant a finding that the defendant had been guilty of the acts of infidelity charged against him, but I cannot concur in his conclusion that the evidence warrants the finding that the plaintiff had been guilty of the acts charged against her by the defendant. Charges of this kind are only to be established by clear and convincing evidence; they are so serious in their character, and the results so grave, that a court should hesitate before making a finding of guilty except when thoroughly satisfied of the truth of the charge. While I have great reluctance in refusing to concur in a finding of fact upon conflicting evidence, made by a referee of the ability of the one in this case, who has had the witnesses before him, still, after reading and rereading the testimony in this case, my mind refuses to reach the conclusion that the charge made against the plaintiff is sufficiently established. There is no direct evidence of the commission of the act alleged against her, but only evidence of circumstances which, if no defense had been offered, might he sufficient to warrant an inference of guilty conduct, but not only is a defense made in this case by the plaintiff, and the acts charged against her denied, but the evidence to establish the facts from which the unfavorable inferences are to be drawn, is controverted by -witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff, who seem to be at least entitled to as much credit as those sworn on behalf of the defendant. Without reviewing the testimony at length, it is sufficient to say that I cannot concur in the view of this branch of the case taken by the referee, and that, therefore, I think the decision arrived at by him in refusing to allow a judgment and aeci’ee in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant should be sustained, and that portion of his decision wherein he allows a judgment and decree in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, should be reversed, without costs or disbursements of this appeal to either party.

Putnam, J., concurred.
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Sequans Communications S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Georges Karam, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 31, 2017





By:/s/ Dr. Georges KaramName: Dr. Georges KaramTitle: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
23.2
 
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-152448) and on Form
S-3 (No. 333-159911) of Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC, of our report
dated March 31, 2008 related to the consolidated statements of operations,
members’ equity, cash flows and comprehensive loss of Vanguard Natural
Resources, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2007, which appears in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
 
 /s/ UHY
LLP
  Houston,
Texas
 March 4,
2010
|   | 1.    I      have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Vanguard Natural      Resources, LLC; |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | 2.    Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   |    |
|--------|--------------|

|   | /s/      Scott W. Smith                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Scott      W. Smith                        |
|   |                                       |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal      Executive Officer)         |
|   | Vanguard      Natural Resources, LLC       |
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## Federal Grant Programs Guide: Funding Opportunities

Need information on current federal funding opportunities? Rulo Strategies, with support from SJI, is releasing weekly updates on open solicitations for federal funding opportunities of potential interest to state courts and their justice system partners, organized by topic.  This resource highlights key information to help jurisdictions make decisions about whether to pursue these funding opportunities. Please note that the solicitation or notice of funding that is linked serves as the official guidance on how to apply for the funding, required and allowable expenses, and deadlines. If a funding opportunity looks relevant to the work you are planning for, please read through each solicitation/notice of funding closely to respond to all requirements. The current Federal Grant Programs guide can be accessed here.

### 

                    - New-Funding-Opportunity  (37 kB)

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
#### Henry P. Stone, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. Thomas B. Kenney, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Bradley, J.;

Haight, J., not sitting.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6092

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RODERICK BLACK,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (2:94-cr-00015-BO-9)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Black appeals the district court’s order 

denying Black’s motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Black, 

No. 2:94-cr-00015-BO-9 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2009; entered 

Dec. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-33 (d)

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth
hereinbelow, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

The Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of
noncompliance with the servicing criterion set forth in Section
229.1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of the CFR with respect to the Platform. Specifically,
the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations for all asset-backed
securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank
statement cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.


FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
General Partner

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 28, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5154 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5154

 To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and 
 the Administrator of General Services to make rules to streamline and 
 simplify the registration system used by small business concerns, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2014

   Mr. Peters of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and 
 the Administrator of General Services to make rules to streamline and 
 simplify the registration system used by small business concerns, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open Government Technology Work to 
More Businesses Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS FOR BUSINESS REGISTRATION SYSTEM TO BE CONSIDERED 
              FOR FEDERAL CONTRACT.

    (a) Updating Registration System.--Not later than 6 months after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small 
Business Administration and the Administrator of General Services shall 
jointly make rules--
            (1) to streamline and simplify the registration system used 
        by small business concerns to be considered for an award of any 
        Federal contract;
            (2) that establish procedures by which a small business 
        concern may self-certify its eligibility for a Federal contract 
        under section 8 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637); and
            (3) that establish procedures by which a majority of small 
        business concerns may complete the registration process not 
        later than 4 weeks after beginning such process.
    (b) Unified Electronic System.--Not later than 12 months after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration and the Administrator of General Services shall make the 
registration system described in subsection (a)(1) available in a 
unified electronic format accessible through the Internet.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued April 25 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 19
- 00215
- CV

——————————— CAMPBELL CONCRETE & MATERIALS, LLC F/K/A / CAMPBELL

CONCRETE & MATERIALS , LP , Appella nt

V. WELL S FARGO BANK, N.A. , TRUSTEE , Appell e e

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 13
- DCV
- 210992

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant ha s filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice because the parties have settled their differences

. No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42. 1 (a), 43.2(f). We dismiss a ny pending motions as moot

.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower.
#### Nelson A. Salisbury v. Henry P. Niehbur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### Timothy Gannon v. The County of Queens, etc.

Appeal of Timothy Gannon from judgment entered October twenty-fifth is dismissed, with ten dollars costs.
EX-10.36






Exhibit 10.36




AMENDMENT NO. 10

TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED

BEARINGPOINT, INC. 401(k) PLAN




     WHEREAS, BearingPoint, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Amended and Restated BearingPoint,
Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to its authority under Section 16.1 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee
of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”), acting for the Company, acted
on May 1, 2009, to retroactively amend the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2009, to provide that
all Participants whose employment with the Company terminates on or after January 1, 2009 shall be
fully vested under the Plan as of January 1, 2009.



     NOW, THEREFORE, to implement the Compensation Committee’s action, the Plan is hereby amended,
effective as set forth herein, in the following respects:



     1. Section 9.3(a)(2) of the Plan is amended, effective as of January 1, 2009, by the addition
of the following sentence to the end thereof:




     “Notwithstanding the foregoing or any provision of the Plan to the contrary,
the Matching Account and the Profit Sharing Account of a Participant whose
employment with the Company terminates on or after January 1, 2009 shall be fully
vested as of January 1, 2009.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed on behalf of the Corporation by the
undersigned duly authorized officer of the Corporation, effective as set forth herein.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BEARINGPOINT, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date: May 1, 2009

	 	By:

Its:
	 	/s/ Jill Kanin-Lovers
 

Member of Board of Directors
Exhibit 99.2


			  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
		SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2002 (the "Report"), I, Karen L. Hail, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify that:

	(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



________________________
Karen L. Hail
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0606

_____________________________

KODY MITCHELL MONIZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court of Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

June 19, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary Lawton, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.