alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Blueprint



Exhibit 10.2




 

NUKKLEUS INC.

525 Washington Blvd.

Jersey City, New Jersey  07310

 

June 3, 2016

 

Emil Assentato, Manager

Currency Mountain Holdings Bermuda, Limited

 

Nukkleus Limited

 

Re: Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated May 24, 2016 between Currency Mountain Holdings Bermuda, Limited (the “Seller”) and Nukkleus Inc. (the “Purchaser”)

 

Dear Mr. Assentato:

 

Reference is hereby made to the Agreement. It is hereby agreed to by the parties that Section 2.3 of the Agreement shall be amended and restated to state the following:

 

"2.3.           Purchase Price. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the aggregate purchase price to be paid by Purchaser for the purchase of the Acquired Assets (the “Purchase
Price”) shall be (a) 48,400,000 shares of common stock of the Purchaser, $0.0001 par value per share (the “Shares”). The Shares are being issued under Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and/or Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act and, as a result, the certificate representing the Shares shall be affixed with the appropriate restrictive legend in accordance with the Securities Act.

The Purchaser acknowledges that the certificate representing the Shares shall bear the following legend:

THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED

UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. THEY MAY NOT

BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE, PLEDGED,

HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED IN

THE ABSENCE OF A REGISTRATION STATEMENT WITH

RESPECT TO THE SECURITIES UNDER SUCH ACT AND

THE OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY

SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH

REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED OR UNLESS SOLD

PURSUANT TO RULE 144 OR RULE 144A OF SUCH ACT.

 

As further consideration for Seller's entering into this Agreement with the Purchaser, the parties agree that in connection with the initial capital raise in excess of $5,000,000, the parties will undertake to provide that 33% of the capital (“Distributed Capital”) will be distributed to those certain sellers named in that certain Stock
Purchase Agreement dated May 27, 2016 by and between Nukkleus Inc., IBIH Limited, Terra (FX) Offshore Limited, Ludico Investments Limited, Currency Mountain Holdings LLC and the sellers party thereto (the "SPA Sellers"), with Seller receiving 48.5% of the Distributed Capital and the SPA Sellers (pro-rata to their interest) receiving 51.5% of the Distributed Capital."



 






 



 

We kindly request that you execute this letter below indicating that you agree with the above amendment and statements.

 


	
 
	
 
Sincerely,

 

Nukkleus Inc.

 

By: /s/ Emil Assentato

Name: Emil Assentato

Title: CEO









AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:

 

Currency Mountain Holdings Bermuda, Limited

 

 

By: /s/ Emil Assentato

Name: Emil Assentato

Title: Manager

 

 

Nukkleus Limited

 

 

By: /s/ Emil Assentato

Name: Emil Assentato

Title: Manager
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 

Chapter

In re

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF 

ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

, whose business address and telephone number is

Debtor(s).

)

)

)

)

______________________________

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of

having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of

California on a pro hac vice basis, representing

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application

will constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.

**END OF ORDER**

Signed and Filed: May 8, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

William Kreysler & Associates, Inc. California

Lambert & Rogers, APLC, 359 W. Madison Avenue, Suite 100, El Cajon, CA 92020; 

(619) 588-7889,

Michael Rogers 1119-30088-DM

PG&E CORPORATION and 

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Entered on Docket 

May 08, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1915 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 11:06:22 Page 1 of

1
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Shirley Lenoir, Individually and as personal representative of the
estate of Shana Lenoir and Christopher McK night , Individually and as next friend of Nayla McKnig ht v. U.T. Physicians, Angela Mathews, Leah Ann Gonski Marino f/k/a Leah Ann Gonski, and Jaou

- Chen Huang, M.D.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00767

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 35806

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s Opp osed Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of Interlocutory Appeal is
GRANTED . Appellant’s notice of appeal is considered timely filed as of September 12, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Harvey Brown  Acting ind ividually

Date: November 25, 2014
#### Robert L. Harrison, Respondent, v. Edward W. Vanderbilt and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Van Brunt, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
-------------------

Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
May 14, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
#### LEXINGTON INSULATION COMPANY v. DAVIDSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant. JAY NORWOOD HOWARD and FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Third Party Defendants.

(Filed 19 May, 1954.)

Appeal and Error § 23 — ?

On appeal from order striking two paragraphs and parts of six other paragraphs or allegations in the answer or further answer, an assignment of error to the ruling of the court “as to the individual section stricken” and to the orders of the court generally, and to the signing of the orders, is a broadside assignment of error presenting no question for decision.

Appeal, by defendant Howard from *Sink, J.,*November Term, 1953, DavidsoN. Affirmed.

. Civil action to recover on account for materials furnished and work done on County buildings, heard on motion of defendant Davidson County to strike certain allegations from the answer and further answer of defendant Howard.

The motion was allowed and the court below entered its order striking part of two allegations of the answer, two full paragraphs and four parts of other paragraphs (including Exhibit A) of the further answer. Defendant Howard excepted and appealed.

*B. C. Brock for appellant Howard.*

*Charles W. Mauze for appellee Davidson County.*

Pee Cukiam.

The appellant’s one assignment of error is as follows: “Appellant . . . assigns as error the ruling of the Court as to the individual section stricken and to the orders of the Court generally and to the signing of the orders.”

This is a general broadside assignment of error which specifieth nothing. It presents no question for decision by this Court. *Worsley v. Rendering Co.,*239 N.C. 547, and cases cited. Even so, an examination of the record discloses that the order was well advised.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Calvert, Appellant.

— Conviction and judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2769-2    Filed: 06/26/19    Entered: 06/26/19 16:48:42    Page 1of 1
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2322-4    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 15:16:23    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2322-4    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 15:16:23    Page 2of 2
##### 



Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls; and
  May 12, 2006
 /s/ Karen L. HailChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2894-1 Filed: 07/08/19 Entered: 07/08/19 15:13:07 Page 1

of 2
COMPENSATION BY PROFESSIONAL 

MAY 1, 2019 THROUGH MAY 31, 2019 

The attorneys and paraprofessionals who rendered legal services in these Chapter 11 Cases from 

May 1, 2019 through May 31, 2019 (the “Fee Period”) are: 

NAME OF 

PROFESSIONAL: POSITION 

YEAR 

ADMITTED 

HOURLY

RATE 

TOTAL

HOURS

BILLED 

TOTAL 

COMPENSATION 

Tobias S. Keller Partner 1990 800 27.7 $22,160 

Peter J. Benvenutti Partner 1974 800 74.6 $59,680 

Jane Kim Partner 20031 650 71.4 $46,410 

Keith A. McDaniels Of Counsel 1997 600 33.1 $19,860 

Dara L. Silveira Associate 2010 400 4.5 $1,800 

Thomas B. Rupp Associate 2011 400 74.7 $29,880 

Jacob Bodden Paralegal Trainee N/A 150 104.4 $15,660 

Total Professionals: 390.4 $195,450 

1 Member of the California Bar since 2014 

 PROFESSIONALS 

TOTALS: 

BLENDED RATE 

(rounded to nearest 

dollar) 

TOTAL HOURS 

BILLED 

TOTAL 

COMPENSATION 

Partners and Counsel 716 206.8 $148,110 

Associates 400 79.2 $31,680 

Blended Attorney Rate 627 286 $179,790 

Paraprofessionals and other non-legal staff 150 104.4 $15,660 

Total Fees Incurred 390.4 $195,450 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2894-1 Filed: 07/08/19 Entered: 07/08/19 15:13:07 Page 2

of 2
NUMBER 13

- 1 3

- 00 446

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

DONALD D. POWERS AND LESLIE

E. POWERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS CO

- TRUSTEES OF THE DONALD

D. POWERS AND LESLIE E. POWERS

CHARITABLE REMAINDER UNITRUST

, Appellants,

v.

EOG RESOURCES, INC., WALTER C.

ENGLISH, JR., AND LEGACY, LLC.

, Appellees.

On a ppeal from the 25 th District Court

of Gonzales County, Texas



### ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and an agreed advisory to the Court2 regarding settlement. The parties advise this Court that they have tentatively reached a

settlement agreement in this matter and request that the Court abate any furt her

deadlines in the appeal pending the filing of dismissal documents.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the

motion to abate, is of the opinion that the motion to abate the appeal pending settlement

should be granted. The motion to abate the appeal pending settlement is GRANTED

and this appeal is ordered ABATED until December 9, 2013

.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

15 th day of November, 2013

.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Interest Project (SIP): Provider and Public Health Input for Vaccine 
Policy Decisions SIP 10-036, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 11 a.m.-5 p.m., June 18, 2010 (Closed)
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Provider and Public Health Input for Vaccine Policy 
Decisions, SIP 10-036.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Michelle Mathieson, Public 
Health Analyst, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health 
Promotion, Office of the Director, Extramural Research Program 
Office, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341, 
Telephone: (770) 488-3068, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d100915453d1e191e531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8be6ffe3b3cbe8efe8a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: May 21, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-13011 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Richard W. Slack (pro hac vice) 

(richard.slack@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: (212) 310-8000 

Fax: (212) 310-8007 

KELLER BENVENUTTI KIM LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kbkllp.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kbkllp.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: (415) 496-6723 

Fax: (415) 636-9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and 

Reorganized Debtors 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 - and - 

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF 

APRIL 25, 2023, 

OMNIBUS HEARING 

Date: April 25, 2023 

Time: 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) 

Place: (Tele/Videoconference Only) 

United States Bankruptcy Court 

 Courtroom 17, 16th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94102

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13679 Filed: 04/24/23 Entered: 04/24/23 13:04:49 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that no matters have been scheduled to be heard in the 

above-captioned chapter 11 cases on April 25, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) (the 

“Omnibus Hearing”). 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, accordingly, the Omnibus Hearing is 

cancelled.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that copies of any pleadings filed with the Court and 

referenced herein can be viewed and/or obtained: (i) by accessing the Court’s website at 

http://www.canb.uscourts.gov, (ii) by contacting the Office of the Clerk of the Court at 450 

Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102, or (iii) from the Debtors’ notice and claims 

agent, Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC (formerly known as Prime Clerk), at 

https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/pge or by calling (844) 339-4217 (toll free) for U.S.-based 

parties; or +1 (929) 333-8977 for International parties or by e-mail at: pgeinfo@ra.kroll.com. 

Note that a PACER password is needed to access documents on the Bankruptcy Court’s website. 

Dated: April 24, 2023 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

KELLER BENVENUTTI KIM LLP 

 By: /s/ Thomas B. Rupp 

 Thomas B. Rupp 

 

Attorneys for Debtors and Reorganized Debtors 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13679 Filed: 04/24/23 Entered: 04/24/23 13:04:49 Page 2

of 2
sjdocs-7222728v15316_paltarn.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



 


PROMISSORY NOTE


US$34,000.00                                                                                                                          
May 3, 2016


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, PALTAR
NATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (the “Borrower”), promises to pay to the
order of DAVID N. SIEGEL REVOCABLE TRUST 2009 (the “Lender”)
the principal sum of THIRTY-FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS (US$34,000.00) in lawful currency of the United States (the “Principal
Sum”), together with interest thereon as herein provided.


The Principal Sum or such amount as shall
remain outstanding from time to time and shall bear interest, thereon,
calculated daily, at a rate of ten percent (10%) per annum as of the
issue dates of May 3, 2016.  In the event of any partial repayment made on the
Principal Sum, such payments shall be applied firstly towards accrued interest
and then towards the Principal Sum.


The Principal Sum and all accrued and unpaid
interest at the rate aforesaid will become due and payable on May 3, 2017
(the “Term”).  Extension of time of payment of all or any part of the
amount owing hereunder at any time or times and failures of the Lender to
enforce any of their rights or remedies hereunder shall not release the
Borrower from its obligations hereunder or constitute a waiver of the rights of
the Lender to enforce any rights and remedies therein.


On default in payment of any sum due
hereunder for the Principal Sum or interest or after 15 days’ notice of Default
to the Borrower, the unpaid balance of the Principal Sum and all accrued
interest thereon shall at the option of the Lender forthwith become due and
payable.


This Promissory Note shall be governed by
the laws of the State of Delaware.


The undersigned will have the privilege of prepaying in whole or
in part the Principal Sum and accrued interest.


Presentment, protest, notice of protest and
notice of dishonour are
hereby waived.


 


DAVID N. SIEGEL REVOCABLE TRUST 2009 PALTAR
NATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


 


/s/
David N. Siegel                                                  /s/
John R. Hislop                                            

DAVID N. SIEGEL, Trustee                                   JOHN R. HISLOP,
President
#### THE STATE, Appellant, v. BULL YORK SMITH.

Division Two,

November 23, 1909.

For the reason stated in State v. Craig, *ante,*p. 201, this appeal by the State is dismissed.

Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. — Ho». *Henry L. Bright,*Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

*Elliott W. Major,*Attorney-General, *James T. Blair*and *Charles G. Revelle,*Assistant Attorneys-General, for the State.

FOX, J.

The record in this cause is substantially the same as that in State v. Craig, *ante,*p. 201, decided at the present sitting of this court; at least, it presents the same legal proposition. We deem it unnecessary to repeat what was said in the Craig case as to the right of the State to prosecute an appeal, hut it is sufficient to say that, adopting the conclusions as reached by this court in that case, it follows that the appeal in the case at bar should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,722
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (95)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,224
<PP&E>                                           6,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,512)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,870
<SALES>                                         39,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,709
<CGS>                                           15,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (948)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (67,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       260
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (67,486)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            4
<NET-INCOME>                                  (67,490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(7.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(7.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### Lizzie Guibert, Respondent, v. William B. Whiteman, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Opinion by

Daniels. J.