alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Ernest A. Bates, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Shared Hospital Services;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; andb) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;] andc) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (or the fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.August 14, 2007       /s/ Ernest A. Bates, M.D. Ernest A. Bates, M.D.    Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 8

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2823-9 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 12:56:04 Page 1

of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES

Date: November 6, 2018 Time: 43 minutes

2:16 p.m. to 2:59 p.m.

Judge: WILLIAM H. ORRICK

Case No.: 14-cv-04393-WHO Case Name: San Francisco Herring Association v. Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company

Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart G. Gross

Attorneys for Defendant: Scott D. Mroz and Sandi L. Nichols

Deputy Clerk: Jean Davis Court Reporter: FTR Recording

PROCEEDINGS

Counsel appear for case management conference. The Court queries counsel as to dispositive 

legal issues which defendants would like to address. Counsel heard on their opinions regarding 

the potentially dispositive issues and the coordination of the litigation of those issues and the 

discovery schedule. 

The Court queries counsel on appropriate litigation structure, specifically whether the claims of

Mr. Clarke concerning the Cannery should be consolidated at some point. Counsel agree that 

there are no damages available to Mr. Clarke; the remedies will be in the form of injunctive relief 

and penalties and will be for determination by the Court rather than a jury. 

The defense asks to file more than one motion for summary judgment, which is granted. The 

initial defense motion for summary judgment will be filed by November 20, 2018. Plaintiff is 

directed to respond within three (3) weeks. Any reply is due a week later. If plaintiff believes 

that discovery is necessary to respond to the motion--and the parties are not in agreement as to 

that issue--a joint letter should be filed within five (5) days of the filing of the motion that

identifies the specific discovery necessary. Hearing on the motion is set for January 9, 2019 

at 2:00 p.m.

Further Case Management Conference set for May 7, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE:

Fact discovery cutoff: May 15, 2019

Expert disclosure: May 15, 2019

Expert rebuttal: June 7, 2019

Expert discovery cutoff: July 1, 2019

Case 3:14-cv-04393-WHO Document 182 Filed 11/06/18 Page 1 of 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2823-9 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 12:56:04 Page 2

of 3
Dispositive Motions heard by: August 28, 2019

Pretrial Conference: October 21, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. 

Trial: November 12, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. by Jury

Case 3:14-cv-04393-WHO Document 182 Filed 11/06/18 Page 2 of 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2823-9 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 12:56:04 Page 3

of 3
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00822-CR

Ricardo RUIZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR0550

Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE MARION

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED December 17, 2014.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-4    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-4    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 2of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Cadmus
Communications Corporation's Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated
Statements of Income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,402
<INVENTORY>                                     22,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,686
<PP&E>                                         210,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 274,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,770
<BONDS>                                        102,647
<COMMON>                                         3,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   274,478
<SALES>                                        191,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,154
<CGS>                                          148,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,302
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32


                             REX Stores Corporation
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned officers of REX Stores Corporation (the "Company")
hereby certify, to their knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005, which this certificate accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



STUART A. ROSE
Stuart A. Rose


DOUGLAS L. BRUGGEMAN
Douglas L. Bruggeman


Dated:  September 7, 2005
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41239 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS CAMARILLO-ANDAVERDE, also known as Jorge Camarillo-Andaverde, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-174-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Luis Camarillo-Andaverde raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
June 26, 2016





 



 


 



Lawrence J. Knopf


2 Winslow Road


Needham, MA 02492


 







 


Dear Larry,


 


Reference is made to the employment letter (the “Agreement”) between you and HeartWare, Inc. (the “Company”), dated March 21, 2011, as amended from time to time.  You and the Company desire to amend the Agreement in the manner described below.


 



	
  

	
1.

	
Total Salary.  The definition of “Total Salary” in your Agreement shall be replaced by the following:







 


“Total Salary” means your current Base Salary plus your current target annual cash bonus assuming 100% corporate and individual achievement.


 



	
  

	
2.

	
No Other Changes. The terms and conditions of the Agreement, to the extent not modified hereby, will continue to apply as specified in the Agreement.







 


To indicate your acceptance of these updated terms and conditions of your employment, please sign below.



 



	 	
Sincerely,

	 
	 	HEARTWARE, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	BY:	 /s/ Douglas Godshall	 
	 	Title:   	President and CEO	 







 


 


 



	
Accepted and agreed:

	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 /s/ Larry Knopf	 
	
Larry Knopf
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-168942 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-151155) of our reports dated March 2, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.











/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLPErnst & Young LLP











Houston, Texas


March 2, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Cadmus
Communications Corporation's Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated
Statements of Income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,968
<INVENTORY>                                     28,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,359
<PP&E>                                         272,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                 119,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 446,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,622
<BONDS>                                        207,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,469
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   446,909
<SALES>                                        377,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               377,859
<CGS>                                          295,154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  399,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (697)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,067
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,376)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,053)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,053)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $(2.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(2.00)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   PAGE 17 OF 17

                             [MET-COIL LETTERHEAD]
================================================================================
FOR RELEASE:                                    CONTACT:
            IMMEDIATELY                                  TAMMY HUBACEK


                    MET-COIL REPORTS PROFIT FOR FIRST QUARTER


CEDAR RAPIDS, IA - OCTOBER 5, 1998 - Met-Coil Systems Corporation (METS)
announces a profitable first quarter and improved gross margin.

Met-Coil is a supplier of advanced sheet metal forming equipment, fabricating
equipment and glass processing technologies for the global market.

"Revenues have exceeded $10 million per quarter for six consecutive quarters",
reports Jim Heitt, President and Chief Operating Officer of Met-Coil. Order
backlog at the end of the first quarter was $18.1 million, which is the highest
since 1995, compared to $16.8 million one year ago.

FIRST QUARTER RESULTS
Revenue of $10.4 million for the first quarter ended August 31, 1998 remained
highly consistent with the first quarter of last year, which was also $10.4
million. Net income for the first quarter was $867,000, $.21 diluted earnings
per common share (which included income tax credits of $265,000) compared to net
income of $177,000 or $.01 diluted earnings per share one year ago. The income
tax credits relate to a reduction in the Company's deferred tax asset valuation
allowance.

Gross margin improved 2% in the first quarter due to lower materials cost for
the products being manufactured, compared to the same period last year. Due to
debt reduction over the past year, interest expense decreased by 26%.

Met-Coil is headquartered in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Its operating units and
affiliates include Iowa Precision Industries, Inc. also in Cedar Rapids;
Met-Coil Ltd., Ayase, Japan; and The Lockformer Company and Met-Coil Ltd.-USA,
both in Lisle, Illinois. The Company markets its machinery and metal fabrication
systems primarily through a worldwide distributor network.

                                 # # # END # # #
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00359-CV

In re Jerel Smith

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Jerel Smith has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. Relator 

requests that this Court compel the district clerk to allow Relator to use service of process by 

constable in his underlying lawsuit.

We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless

necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(a); In re Ramos, No. 03-21-

00297-CV, 2021 WL 2793468, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin July 6, 2021, orig. proceeding) (mem. 

op.). Smith has failed to provide an adequate record of his filings with the district court or 

otherwise demonstrate that issuing mandamus against the district clerk is necessary to enforce 

our jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a); In re Ramos, 2021 WL 2793468, at *1.1

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

1 Although Smith has requested mandamus relief for the purpose of having defendant 

served in the underlying lawsuit, we note the trial court docket reflects that the defendant was 

already served on July 21, 2021 by a Travis County constable.
2

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: August 13, 2021
**Exhibit 34.5.2**

[Letterhead of KPMG LLP] 

KPMG LLP 

1601 Market Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2499 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Members 

Regulus Group LLC: 

We haveexamined management’s assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, including in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that RegulusGroup LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities andservicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of theservicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination wasconducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specifiedabove and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities relatedto the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transaction andservicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Companycomplied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

February 12, 2008 

KPMG, LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership is the U.S. 

member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative
� .:::L. 

..c C +-

1 KIMBERLY S. WINICK, SBN 120363 

KWinick@ClarkTrev.com 

2 CLARK & TREVITHICK 

800 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

3 Los Angeles, California 9001 7 

Telephone: (213) 629-5700 

4 Facsimile: (213) 624-9441 

5 Attorneys for Interested Party 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

11 In re 

12 PG&E CORPORATION, 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Debtor. 

CASE NO. 19-30088-DM 

Chapter 11 

AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

AND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL 

NOTICE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Kimberly S. Winick of Clark & Trevithick hereby enters her 

appearance as attorney for Interested Party, and requests that all notices given or required to be given 

and all papers served or required to be served in this case including, in accordance with Rules 

2002(a)(2), (3), and (7), and 9007 of the Bankruptcy Rules, and Sections 102(1), and 342(a), and 

1009(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, be provided to and served upon its counsel at the following address 

and telephone number: 

Dated: January 31, 2019 

2375888.1 (18726.001) 

Kimberly S. Winick, Esq. 

kwinick@clarktrev.com 

Clark & Trevithick 

800 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Telephone: (213) 629-5700 

CLARK & TREVITHICK 

By: Isl Kimberly S. Winick 

Kimberly S. Winick 

Attorneys for Interested Party 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 181 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 11:26:22 Page 1 of 1 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND REQUEST FOR NOTICE