Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices 29569 

Title: Aircraft Operator Security. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

OMB Control Number: 1652–0003. 

Forms(s): N/A. 

Affected Public: Aircraft Operators. 

Abstract: 49 CFR part 1544 requires 

aircraft operators to maintain, update, 

and comply with TSA-approved 

comprehensive security programs to 

ensure the freedom of movement for 

people and commerce by monitoring 

aircraft operator security procedures. 

These programs and related records are 

subject to TSA inspection. 

Number of Respondents: 796. 

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An 

estimated 1,841,130 hours annually. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia on May 20, 

2010. 

Joanna Johnson, 

TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office 

of Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12609 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0262] 

Certificate of Alternative Compliance 

for the Offshore Supply Vessel 

JANSON R. GRAHAM 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces 

that a Certificate of Alternative 

Compliance was issued for the offshore 

supply vessel JANSON R. GRAHAM as 

required by 33 U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33 

CFR 81.18. 

DATES: The Certificate of Alternative 

Compliance was issued on March 31, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this notice is 

available for inspection or copying at 

the Docket Management Facility (M–30), 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. You may also 

find this docket on the Internet by going 

to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting 

USCG–2010–0262 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, call 

LTJG Christine Dimitroff, District Eight, 

Prevention Branch, U.S. Coast Guard, 

telephone 504–671–2176. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background and Purpose 

A Certificate of Alternative 

Compliance, as allowed under Title 33, 

Code of Federal Regulation, Parts 81 and 

89, has been issued for the offshore 

supply vessel JANSON R. GRAHAM, 

O.N. 1222117. Full compliance with 72 

COLREGS and Inland Rules Act would 

hinder the vessel’s ability to maneuver 

within close proximity of offshore 

platforms. The forward masthead light 

may be located on the top forward 

portion of the pilothouse 6.2 meters 

above the hull. Placing the forward 

masthead light at the height required by 

Annex I, paragraph 2(a) of the 72 

COLREGS and Annex I, Section 84.03(a) 

of the Inland rules Act would result in 

a masthead light location highly 

susceptible to damage when working in 

close proximity to offshore platforms. 

Additionally, the horizontal distance 

between the forward and aft masthead 

lights may be 2.489 meters. Placing the 

aft masthead light at the horizontal 

distance from the forward masthead 

light as required by Annex I, paragraph 

3(a) of the 72 COLREGS and Annex I, 

Section 84.05(a) of the Inland Rules Act 

would result in an aft masthead light 

location directly over the aft cargo deck 

where it would interfere with loading 

and unloading operations. 

The Certificate of Alternative 

Compliance allows for the vertical 

placement of the forward masthead light 

to deviate from requirements set forth in 

Annex I, paragraph 2(a) of 72 COLREGS 

and Annex I, Section 84.03(a) of the 

Inland Rules Act. In addition the 

Certificate of Alternative Compliance 

allows for the horizontal separation of 

the forward and aft masthead lights to 

deviate from the requirements of Annex 

I, paragraph 3(a) of 72 COLREGS and 

Annex I, Section 84.05(a) of the Inland 

Rules Act. 

Dated: 15 April 2010. 

J. W. Johnson, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Chief, 

Inspections and Investigations Branch By 

Direction of the Commander Eighth Coast 

Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12602 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0031] 

Recovery Policy RP9526.1, Hazard 

Mitigation Funding Under Section 406 

(Stafford Act) 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: This document provides 

notice of the final Recovery Policy 

RP9526.1, Hazard Mitigation Funding 

Under Section 406 (Stafford Act), which 

is being issued by the Federal 

Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA). 

DATES: This policy is effective March 30, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: This final policy is available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov 

under docket ID FEMA–2010–0031 and 

on FEMA’s Web site at http:// 

www.fema.gov. You may also view a 

hard copy of the final policy at the 

Office of Chief Counsel, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, Room 

835, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20472–3100. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lu 

Juana Richardson, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20472, via e-mail at 

LuJuana.Richardson@dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

policy provides guidance on the 

appropriate use of hazard mitigation 

discretionary funding available under 

Section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford 

Disaster Relief and Emergency 

Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 

5172. This will ensure national 

consistency in the use of Section 406 

mitigation funds and promote measures 

that reduce future loss to life and 

property, protect the Federal investment 

in public infrastructure and ultimately 

help build disaster-resistant 

communities. 

FEMA has revised this policy to 

reflect the alignment of benefit cost 

analysis methodologies between the 

Mitigation and Recovery Directorates. In 

order to achieve consistency across 

program areas and to maximize FEMA’s 

ability to support and encourage costeffective hazard mitigation, the Public 

Assistance Division has adopted the 

Mitigation Directorate’s Benefit Cost 

Analysis (BCA) methodology for Section 

406 hazard mitigation projects. 

Previously, the only benefits considered 

in the BCA were damage to the facility 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1