alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3095-2 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 13:05:10 Page 1

of 2
EXHIBIT B 

COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR 

SERVICES RENDERED BY MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

JANUARY 29, 2019 THROUGH MAY 31, 2019 

TASK 

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT 

020 Legislative Issues 472.20 $402,118.00 

021 Non-Bankruptcy Litigation / Wildfire (Criminal) 6,432.70 $4,339,428.00 

022 Non-Working Travel 217.50 $200,770.50 

023 Purchase Power Agreements (including Adversary Proceedings) 299.90 $213,429.50 

025 Regulatory Issues Including CPUC and FERC 1,691.10 $1,396,705.00 

026 Retention / Billing / Fee Applications: MTO 131.20 $101,545.00 

TOTAL 9,244.60 $6,653,996.00 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3095-2 Filed: 07/19/19 Entered: 07/19/19 13:05:10 Page 2

of 2
No. 17,936.

#### Ernest M. Baber *v.*Central Bank and Trust Company, Trustee, etc. et al.

(299 P. [2d] 116)

Decided July 2, 1956.

Mr. Stanley H. Johnson, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Gorsuch, Kirgis, Campbell, Walker & Grover, for defendant in error Central Bank and Trust Company.

Mr. John C. Banks, for defendant in error City and County of Denver.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This action rests on facts identical to those presented in the case of *Brisnehan v. Central Bank and Trust Company*which has been disposed of by an opinion of this Court announced on this date.

Plaintiff in error Baber contends that the record in connection with his claim presents a question not involved in the Brisnehan case, in that under the provi*55sions of section 21 of the ordinance he was eligible to become a member of the plan notwithstanding the fact that he failed to elect to do so within sixty days.

We cannot agree with this argument, and we believe that this cause is in all respects controlled by the opinion in the case of Tom *Brisnehan v. The Central Bank and Trust Company, supra.*Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

STATE OF DELAWARE )

)

V. ) ID# 0608007491

)

ELWOOD M. HUNTER, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

AND NOW TO WIT

, this 13 th day of April, 2015, upon consideration of

the Defendant’s Motion for New Trial Pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule

33, IT APPEARS THAT :

1. On January 7, 2007, a jury convicted Defendant of Possession With

Inten t to Deliver Heroin and Use o f a Vehicle for Keeping Controlled Substance

.

On May 11, 2007, Defendant was sentenced as a Habitual Offender under 11 Del

.

C . 4214(b) to Life Imprisonment and an additional 18 months at Level 5. The

Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Super ior Court’s judgment on March 10

,

2008. 1

2 . On January 12, 2015, Defendant filed a Motion for New Trial Pursuant to

Superior Court Criminal Rule 33. 2

1 Hunter v. State , 945 A.2d 594 (Del. 2008) (TABLE).

2 Docket ID 80.2 3

. Defendant contends that he is entitled to a new trial based on newly

discovered evidence of misconduct at the O ffice of the Chief Medical Examiner

(“OCME”) relating to the Laboratory Manager Farnam Daneshgar. At Defendant’s

trial in 2007, Daneshgar testified that he conducted a chemical analysis of the

substance found in Defendant’s possession and that the substance was heroin.

Defendant asserts that he should be granted a new trial because Daneshgar is the

subject of a criminal prosecution related, in part, to his position as Laboratory

Manager at the OCME.

4

. Defendant filed his motion for new trial pursuant to Superior Court

Criminal Rule 33. Under Rule 33, a motion for new trial based on the ground of

newly discovered evidence may be made only before or within two years after final

judgment. 3 Defendant’s m otion is timed barred under to Rule 33 because it was

filed more than two years after final judgment.

NOW THEREFORE

, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s

Motion for New Trial Pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 33 is DENIED

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jan R. Jurden, President Judge

cc: Prothonotary

– Original

Defendant

3 Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 33.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-1196

___________

Carol A. Fulbright; Luther Fulbright, *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Des Moines City Housing Authority; *

Bill Wilkens, Director; Marty Good, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Housing Coordinator; Tangela Weiss, *

Housing Supervisor; Rita Townsend, *

Housing Coordinator, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 3, 2001

 Filed: October 9, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Luther and Carol Fulbright appeal the district court’s order dismissing their

housing-discrimination action against the Des Moines City Housing Authority and

four of its employees. The Fulbrights failed to fulfill multiple discovery requests,

despite a court order to do so. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the

district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action, with prejudice,
-2-

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(C). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: dchambers Date Created: 7/11/2019

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 23

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Prime Clerk):

aty Stephen Karotkin Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153

THEODORE E. TSEKERIDES, ESQ. RICHARD W. SLACK, ESQ. Weil, Gotshal & Manges

LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153

TOBIAS S. KELLER, ESQ. Keller & Benvenutti LLP 650 California Street, #1900 San Francisco,

Ca 94108

GREGG M. FICKS, ESQ. Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass LLP 1 Montgomery Street, #3000 San

Francisco, CA 94104

CAMERON M. GULDEN, ESQ. U.S. Department of Justice Office of the United States Trustee 300

Booth Street, RM 3009 Reno, NV 89509

MATTHEW J. TROY, ESQ. U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div. P.O. Box 875 Ben Franklin

Station Washington, DC 20044

ALAN J. STONE, ESQ. Milbank LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001

GREGORY BRAY, ESQ. Milbank LLP 2029 Century Park East, 33rd Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90067

LARS H. FULLER, ESQ. Baker & Hostetler LLP 1801 California Street, #4400 Denver, CO 80202

BENJAMIN P. MCCALLEN, ESQ. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 787 Seventh Avenue New York,

NY 10019

NICHOLAS S. GOLDIN, ESQ. MICHAEL H. TORKIN, ESQ. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett

LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017

PAUL J. PASCUZZI, ESQ. Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP 400 Capitol Mall,

#1750 Sacramento, CA 95814

BRIAN S. HERMANN, ESQ. ALAN W. KORNBERG, ESQ. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &

Garrison 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019

EDWARD J. TREDINNICK, ESQ. Greene Radovsky Maloney Share & Hennigh 1 Front Street,

#3200 San Francisco, CA 94111

JONATHAN D. FORSTOT, ESQ. Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022

ESTELA O. PINO, ESQ. Pino & Associates 20 Bicentennial Circle, #200 Sacramento, CA 95826

SAMUEL M. KIDDER, ESQ. DAVID M. STERN, ESQ. Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern

LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars 39th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067

SANDER L. ESSERMAN, ESQ. Stutzman Bromberg Esserman & Plifka, P.C 2323 Bryan Street, Suite

2200 Dallas, TX 75201

MARK GORTON, ESQ. Boutin Jones Inc. 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500 Sacramento, CA 95814

PETER D. WOLFSON, ESQ. Dentons US LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY

10020

EREZ E. GILAD, ESQ. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038

FRANK A. MEROLA, ESQ. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 2029 Century Park East Los

Angeles, CA 90067

DARIO DE GHETALDI, ESQ. Corey, Luzaich, de Ghetaldi & Riddle LLP 700 El Camino

Real Millbrae, CA 94030

TOTAL: 23

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2921-3 Filed: 07/10/19 Entered: 07/10/19 14:49:14 Page 1

of 1
#### Ethel Schlafer, Appellant, v. David Stern and Others, Respondents.

■ affirmed on reargumépf,'with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Jenks, P. J., Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.,
Exhibit 32.1

JMP GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of JMP Group Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph A. Jolson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 3, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    JOSEPH A. JOLSON
|                    |  |  |  | Joseph A. Jolson       
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1723

KAMIL A. MESAYS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID H. HUGEL, ADMINISTRATOR MARYLAND MOTOR

VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA04-1570-RDB)

Submitted: September 17, 2004 Decided: October 18, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kamil A. Mesays, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Mesays v. Hugel, No.

CA-04-1570-RDB (D. Md. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of COPsync, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s
knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities     Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in the
  Report.











Date:           April
      30, 2009
            By:
            /s/    Russell
      ChaneyRussell
      Chaney,
              Chief
      Executive Officer and
              Chief
      Financial Officer


The
forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not incorporated by reference into any filing by the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4926 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4926

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State of Minnesota 
             as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The segment of Interstate Route 35 between milepost 133 at Forest 
Lake, Minnesota, and milepost 259 at Duluth, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the segment of Interstate Route 35 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
FOIA Status Definitions

Status Description

1 Acknowledged Your FOIA request has been received and a FOIA tracking 

number has been assigned to your case.

2 Tasked for Search USSOCOM is searching our records for potential responsive 

documents

3 Tasked for Review USSOCOM has identified potential responsive information to 

your request and is forwarding to subject matter experts for 

further processing

4 Consulting with Another Agency USSOCOM has sent your request to an outside agency for 

further processing

5 In Post Review Processing USSOCOM has received recommendations back from subject 

matter experts and is consolidating and reviewing for 

appropriate FOIA exemptions

6 In Final Process for Closure Your FOIA request is undergoing executive reviews by 

Security and Legal representatives in an effort to complete 

response for final approval

7 Closed – Final Response Sent Your FOIA request is completed and a final response letter 

along with any responsive redacted records has been sent

8 In Appeal Your request has been appealed and USSOCOM has 

forwarded the case to DoD Privacy, Civil Liberties, and 

Transparency Department (DPCLTD) for adjudication

9 Appeal Remanded DPCLTD has recommend the request be sent back to 

USSOCOM for further action

10 In Litigation Your request is currently in litigation with Federal Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 3, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

November 3, 2015

152335

IN RE JONES

SC: 152335

COA: 328229

LC: 04-008273-FH

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of September 23, 2015, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTETLER LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO 

EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2844-1 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 18:16:23 Page 1

of 2
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE 

NORTH BAY INSURED LOSSES FROM THE OCTOBER 2017 WILDFIRES 

County 

Total Number 

of Claims 

Number of 

Claims 

Resulting in 

Total Loss 

Direct 

Incurred Losses 

Amount Paid 

to Date 

RESIDENTIAL PERSONAL PROPERTY 

ALAMEDA 10 2 $ 7,658,327 $ 5,240,438 

LAKE 258 97 $ 49,071,981 $ 24,231,818 

MENDOCINO 551 197 $ 143,767,801 $ 77,400,240 

NAPA 2,510 465 $ 1,153,516,466 $ 615,074,544 

SOLANO 193 5 $ 33,557,421 $ 11,286,705 

SONOMA 14,942 4,832 $ 7,002,896,691 $ 3,671,099,107 

SUBTOTAL 18,465 5,598 $ 8,390,468,687 $ 4,404,332,852 

Residential Property: 

-Homeowners 

-Condominium Unit Owners 

-Mobile Home 

-Tenants/Renters 

-Dwelling Fire and Allied Lines 

-Lender/Force-Placed and Real Estate Owned (REO) 

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY 

ALAMEDA 14 3 $ 8,399,634 $ 4,621,752 

LAKE 5 - $ 196,604 $ 26,957 

MENDOCINO 62 5 $ 20,263,508 $ 6,883,747 

NAPA 749 67 $ 227,567,099 $ 60,192,921 

SOLANO 23 1 $ 697,322 $ 320,213 

SONOMA 1,733 165 $ 717,057,197 $ 223,983,989 

SUBTOTAL 2,586 241 $ 974,181,363 $ 296,029,580 

Commercial Residential: 

-Apartment and Condominium Buildings 

-Condominium Association 

-Homeowners Association 

Commercial Non-Residential: 

-Commercial Multi-Peril 

-Fire and Allied Lines 

-All other Comm. property policies not specified above 

PERSONAL AND COMMERCIAL AUTO 

ALAMEDA 2

LAKE 30 

MENDOCINO 178 

NAPA 621 

SOLANO 125 

SONOMA 4,052 

SUBTOTAL 5,008 

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

67,100 $ 

292,689 $ 

2,209,358 $ 

10,032,988 $ 

1,371,966 $ 

66,867,522 $ 

80,841,623 $ 

62,977 

229,123 

1,672,158 

7,912,097 

334,086 

59,545,851 

69,756,292 

OTHER LINES 

ALAMEDA 

LAKE

MENDOCINO 

NAPA

SOLANO

SONOMA 

SUBTOTAL 

6

22 

42 

196 

7

559 

832 

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

1,850 $ 

128,209 $ 

12,572,027 $ 

42,062,854 $ 

139,657 $ 

52,651,630 $ 

107,556,227 $ 

350 

124,742 

8,613,044 

20,349,436 

139,657 

32,106,593 

61,333,822 

All other Commercial 

Non-residential exposures 

(Ocean Marine, Inland Marine, Aircraft, 

Boiler and Machinery, etc.) 

GRAND TOTAL 26,892 $ 9,553,047,901 $ 4,831,452,546 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2844-1 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 18:16:23 Page 2 Release Date: January 31, 2018 

of 2
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-09-00478- CR

Arc hie Terre ll Scaif

e, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 264 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 640 79, H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On J une 29, 2009, appellant Arc hie Terr ell Scaife pleade d g uilty to possessing more than one g ram but less than four g rams of coca ine in a school zone. See Tex. Hea lth & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.115(a) , (c) , .134(c) (West Supp. 2009). Appellant also admitted a previous felony conviction alleg ed for enhanc ement. The trial court acc epted appellant’ s pleas, adjudg ed him g uilty , and s en t en ce d him to fiftee n y ear s’ imprisonment as called for in a plea barg ain ag ree ment. Appellant filed a

pro se notice of appe al on August 7, 2009. The trial c ourt appointed a n attorney to repr esent appellant on appea l, and counsel has filed a brief challeng ing the p re t ri al order

overr uling a motion to s uppress e vidence

. Be cause there was no motion for new trial, the notice of appea l was not timely

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (1). No extension of time for filing notice of appea l was reque sted. See Tex. R. A pp. P. 26.3. The notice of a ppeal wa s not properly

mailed to the district cler k within the timeprescri b ed by rule 26.2(a)

. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circ umstances, we lack

jurisdiction to d i s p o s e o f t he purported appeal i n any manner other than by dismiss ing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W .2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Ol i vo v. S t a te , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522-23 (Te x . Crim. App. 1996). 1

The a ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: June 3, 2010 Do Not Publish

T h e rec ord also contains a waiver of appea l signe d by appellant on the day sent en ce wa s 1 imposed. Neve rtheless, the trial court cer tified that appellant has the rig ht to appea l pretria l ruling s. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a) (2). Even if we assume that the trial court intended to g rant permission to appea l, the late notice of appea l does not invoke our jurisdiction.

2
- :..,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXASUnder thlr statute the torn ab the l3i8triotAttomkey-elaetf'ar

l&a 8tb JtdoitiDlatriotd Texas oasarloes en tha ilwt 48y or January,loci,at *iah tias mnh e3.aot.d

carfloor

my quality~,an& amae She butLea 0f th0 alii00. Yoursvary truly ,ATTOIWBX GEM2.U OF TEXAS
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

The undersigned, Peter A. Blyberg, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Union Bankshares Company (the
Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report).

By execution of this
statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |  |  |                                    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Peter A. Blyberg               
|                        |  |  |  | Peter A. Blyberg                   
|                        |  |  |  | President & Chief Executive Officer