alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.3
 
  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
 Of 3SBio Inc.
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  In connection with the Annual Report of 3SBio Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as amended and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jing Lou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  
  Date: November 3, 2011
 By:

/s/    DR. JINGLOUName:

Dr. Jing LouTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-60941

Summary Calendar

LINAS BARANAUSKAS,

Petitioner,

versus

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A 077 661 766

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Linas Baranauskas, a native and citizen of Lithuania and an illegal alien,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 15, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-60941 Document: 00512307310 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2013
No. 12-60941

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

dismissing his appeal of (1) the denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of his

motion to reopen his removal proceedings and rescind the in absentia removal

order issued against him and (2) the denial of his requestfor sua sponte reopening. There is no dispute that Baranauskas’s motion to reopen was not filed

within 180 days after the order of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i);

8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). In that motion, Baranauskas sought equitable

tolling based on alleged misinformation from an immigration consultant.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in construing Baranauskas’s

equitable-tolling argument as a request for the IJ to reopen the removal

proceedings sua sponte. See Ramos-Bonilla v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 216, 220 (5th

Cir. 2008). To the extent Baranauskas argues thatthe BIA erred in dismissing

the appeal of the IJ’s denial, the petition for review is DENIED. To the extent

Baranauskas challenges the basis for the BIA’s dismissal of his appeal from the

IJ’s refusal to reopen, the petition for review is DISMISSED for want of

jurisdiction. See id.

2

 Case: 12-60941 Document: 00512307310 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/15/2013
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officers of Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certify that to their knowledge and in their respective capacities thatthe Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certification isattached (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 5, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/  ANTHONY S. MARUCCI                |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Name:  | Anthony  S. Marucci                    |
|                       |   | Title: | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                       |   |   |                                   |
| Date:  August 5, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/  AVERY W. CATLIN                   |
|                       |   | Name:  | Avery  W. Catlin                       |
|                       |   | Title: | Senior  Vice President and             |
|                       |   |   | Chief  Financial Officer               |

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained byCelldex Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2335

JONATHAN MCCANTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VISION CABLE; FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-1161-3-10-BD) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan McCants, Appellant Pro Se. Harry B. Burchstead, SCHWARTZ, MCLEOD, DURANT & BURCHSTEAD, Sumter, South Carolina; Terri HearnBailey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Gregory Michael Christopher, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's dismissal of one Defendant upon the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying Appellant's motion for a preliminary injunction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The portion of the district court's order denying Appellant's motion to reconsider is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Thus, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is interlocutory and not appealable.But the denial of preliminary injunctive relief may be immediately appealed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation discloses that this portion of the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm this portion of the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 15 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. BONARD RAY DENINNO,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-6347 (D.C. No. CIV-97-656-T & 93-CR-55-T) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Defendant filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or c orrect his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court d enied the motion, and plaintiff appeals. We construe plaintiff’s notice of appeal as an application for a certificate of appealability. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Because plaintiff has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), we deny the request for a certificate of appealability. The appeal is DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, C.R.
        Cloutier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 (1)The
        Report fully complies
        with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act
        of 1934; and
 
 (2)The
        information contained
        in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
                  C. R. CloutierC.R.
                  CloutierChief
                  Executive OfficerNovember
                  10, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jacob M. Faircloth, Esq. (SB No. 305390)

Bluestone Faircloth & Olson, LLP

1825 Fourth Street

Santa Rosa, CA 95404

Telephone: (707) 526-4250

Facsimile: (707) 526-0347

Email: jacob@bfolegal.com

Attorneys for Movants/Claimants of Dan Crowley and Associates and Law Office of

Robert M. Bone –See Exhibit 1 to Consolidated Motion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In Re

PG&E CORPORATION,

 and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

COMPANY

 Debtors.

_________________________________/

Affects: 

9 PG&E Corporation

9 Pacific Gas & Electric Company

: Both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead

Case, No. 19-30088-DM

_________________________________/

Case No. 19-30088-DM

Chapter 11

(Lead Case–Jointly Administered)

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION

OF ROBERT M. BONE REGARDING

CLAIMANTS NO. 5 IN

CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO

ALLOW/DEEM TIMELY LATE

FILING OF CLAIMANTS

Hearing: Only if Requested

Location: Via Zoom or Telephone

I, Robert M. Bone, declare as follows:

1. I am over eighteen (18) years old and am competent to testify as to the

matters set forth hereinbelow, from my personal knowledge–except as to those matters

set forth upon information and belief. 

2. This Declaration is submitted as a supplement to the Consolidated Motion

to Allow/Deem Timely Late Filing of Claimants, filed on August 31, 2022, as Docket

No. 12915 (the “Motion”). 

3. With respect to Claimants No. 5 listed in Exhibit 1 of the Motion, for

Claimants Judith Browning and David Browning, Claim No. 108821, filed on August 24,

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ROBERT M. BONE REGARDING CLAIMANTS NO. 5 

IN CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO ALLOW/DEEM TIMELY LATE FILING OF CLAIMANTS - Page 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12943 Filed: 09/09/22 Entered: 09/09/22 17:57:04 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2022, Exhibit 1 sets forth that Ms. Browning had filed a previous claim, No. 96155. In

fact, that claim is for a different Judith Browning. Mrs. and Mr. Browning have not filed

a previous claim. Moreover, at no time prior to August 2022 were Mr. and Mrs.

Browning aware that their damages/injuries might be compensable prior to the Extended

Bar Date and Claims Questionnaire deadline expiring. 

I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States and of the

State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Santa Rosa, CA, on

September 9, 2022.

/S/ Robert M. Bone

By: __________________________________

Robert M. Bone

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ROBERT M. BONE REGARDING CLAIMANTS NO. 5 

IN CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO ALLOW/DEEM TIMELY LATE FILING OF CLAIMANTS - Page 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12943 Filed: 09/09/22 Entered: 09/09/22 17:57:04 Page 2

of 2
BARBARA ZELMER AND ROBERT ZELMER’S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL NOTICE AND SERVICE 

OF COPIES

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Manuel Corrales, Jr. SBN 117647

ATTORNEY AT LAW

17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 358

San Diego, CA 92128

Tel: (858) 521-0634/Fax: (858) 521-0633

Email: mannycorrales@yahoo.com

Attorney for Creditors BARBARA JEAN ZELMER 

and ROBERT THOMAS ZELMER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In Re

PG&E CORPORATION

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors.

Bankruptcy Cases

19-30088-DM (Lead Case)

19-30089-DM

(Jointly Administered)

BARBARA ZELMER AND ROBERT 

ZELMER’S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL 

NOTICE AND SERVICE OF COPIES

Date: N/A

Time: N/A

Ctrm: Hon. Dennis Montali 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

16th Floor, Courtroom 17 

San Francisco, CA 94102

o Affects PG&E Corporation

o Affects Pacific Gas and 

Electric Corporation

Ä Affects both Debtors

**All papers shall be filed in 

the Lead Case No. 19-30088 DM

TO THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE, THE DEBTOR(S) and ALL 

INTERESTED PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Attorney Manuel Corrales, Jr., 

Esq., submits this Request for Special Notice and Service of 

Copies for Creditors BARBARA ZELMER and ROBERT ZELMER, and 

hereby request special notice of all events relevant to the 

above-referenced bankruptcy and copies of all pleadings or 

documents filed in relation to the above-reference bankruptcy, 

including all pleadings or notices under Federal Rules of 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2186 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 11:43:16 Page 1 of

2
BARBARA ZELMER AND ROBERT ZELMER’S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL NOTICE AND SERVICE 

OF COPIES

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Bankruptcy Procedure, Rule 2002, the commencement of adversary 

proceedings, the filing of any requests for hearing, objections, 

and/or notices of motion, or any other auxiliary filings, as 

well as notice of all matters which must be noticed to 

creditors, creditors committees and parties-in-interest and 

other notices are required by the United States Bankruptcy Code 

and Rules and/or Local Rules of the above-referenced bankruptcy 

court.

Attorney MANUEL CORRALES, JR., Esq. submits this Request 

for Notice and Service of Copies as attorney for BARBARA ZELMER 

and ROBERT ZELMER.

Attorney MANUEL CORRALES, JR., Esq. requests that for all 

notices purposes and for inclusion in the Master Mailing List in 

this case, the following address be used:

Manuel Corrales, Jr., Esq.

Attorney at Law

17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 358

San Diego, CA 92128

DATED: May 3, 2019

s/ Manuel Corrales, Jr.

Manuel Corrales, Jr., Esq.

Attorney for Creditors

BARBARA ZELMER and ROBERT 

ZELMER

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2186 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 11:43:16 Page 2 of

2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM07-10-002]


Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act; 
Notice of Extension of Time

May 24, 2010.
    In comments following the March 25, 2010 Technical Conference in 
the above-referenced proceeding, the Natural Gas Supply Association, 
Shell Producers,\1\ Process Gas Consumers Group, and Independent 
Petroleum Association of America (Commenters) requested that the 
Commission extend the deadline for filing the 2009 Form No. 552 for an 
additional 60 to 90 days from the current deadline of July 1, 2010. The 
Commenters contend that the additional time will allow filers to 
prepare the Form No. 552 based on any additional guidance that the 
Commission will provide in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Shell Gulf of Mexico, Shell Offshore Inc., and SWEPI LP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that all natural gas 
market participants are granted an extension of time until September 1, 
2010 to file their Form No. 552 for calendar year 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-12995 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TIMETHY MORRISON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1026

[November 21, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; James W. McCann, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2011-CF-2468-A.

Daniel J. Tibbitt, Miami, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5119 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5119

To authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to modernize C-130 aircraft 
  using alternative communication, navigation, surveillance, and air 
 traffic management program kits and to ensure that such aircraft meet 
     applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2014

Mr. Carney (for himself and Mrs. Lummis) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to modernize C-130 aircraft 
  using alternative communication, navigation, surveillance, and air 
 traffic management program kits and to ensure that such aircraft meet 
     applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. C-130 FLEET MODERNIZATION.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of modernizing the C-130 fleet, the 
Secretary of the Air Force may install alternative communication, 
navigation, surveillance, and air traffic management program kits in 
lieu of C-130 avionics modernization program kits if the Secretary 
determines, on a case-by-case basis, that such alternative program is 
appropriate and notifies the congressional defense committees (as 
defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) of such 
determination.
    (b) Compatibility With FAA Regulations.--The Secretary shall ensure 
that all C-130 aircraft are capable of meeting applicable regulations 
of the Federal Aviation Administration by January 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5086 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5086

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2014

 Mr. Fortenberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY 
              STUDY.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 
U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(__) Chief standing bear national historic 
                trail.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Chief Standing Bear Trail, 
                extending approximately 550 miles from Niobrara, 
                Nebraska, to Ponca City, Oklahoma, which follows the 
                route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca people 
                during Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 
                miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through Omaha, 
                Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, which follows the 
                return route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca 
                people, as generally depicted on the map entitled 
                `Chief Standing Bear Removal and Return' and dated June 
                25, 2014.
                    ``(B) Availability of map.--The map described in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be on file and available for 
                public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
                Department of the Interior.
                    ``(C) Components.--The feasibility study conducted 
                pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall include a 
                determination on whether the Chief Standing Bear Trail 
                meets the criteria in subsection (b) of for designation 
                as a national historic trail.''.
    (b) Timeline.--The feasibility study authorized by the amendment in 
subsection (a) shall be completed not later than one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
VISION ACQUISITION III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David BergerDavid
      BergerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerDecember
      29, 2010