alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

D.G. HONEGGER CONSULTING

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

D.G. HONEGGER CONSULTING

DOUGLAS G. HONEGGER

2690 SHETLAND PLACE

ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93420

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: June 13, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F Douglas G Honegger $55,954.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 1428 D.G. Honegger Consulting $55,954.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 2892 D.G. Honegger Consulting $62,972.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 2925 D.G. Honegger Consulting $62,970.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2508 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:01:34 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2508 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:01:34 Page 2 of

2
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	SOUTHCOM conducts U.S. Colombia Action Plan (USCAP) Senior Leader Seminar in Bogota
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">SOUTHCOM conducts U.S. Colombia Action Plan (USCAP) Senior Leader Seminar in Bogota</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By Mr. Steve Roman, SOUTHCOM Security Cooperation Division (J5)</b> <span class="date">/ Published July 30, 2018</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p><span>The SOUTHCOM J5 Security Cooperation Division conducted a U.S. Colombia Action Plan Senior Leader Seminar (SLS) in Bogota, Colombia from 10-12 July 2018.  </span></p>
<p><span>The seminar highlighted the importance of “Aligning Capacity Building with the Security Strategy.”   The SLS was a successful collaboration between the SC J5 Security Cooperation Division, the Colombian Vice-Minister of Defense, and the Colombian War College.  </span></p>
<p><span>During the SLS, a team of academics and military experts presented topics dealing with security strategy development, security cooperation/assistance planning, defense institution building, effective capacity building requirement development, and cyber strategy development.  The discussions introduced successful models for strategic planning that consider available and required capabilities to successfully achieve a determined security strategy.  </span></p>
<p><span>Additionally, the experts highlighted the processes for identifying capacity building requirements and the available capacity building opportunities that can be explored through the USCAP.   </span></p>
<p><span>Senior representatives from Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Panama, WHINSEC, and the U.S. Defense Governance Management Team attended the SLS.  At the end of the formal portion of the SLS representatives expressed their satisfaction with the seminar and requested the organizers consider presenting a condensed version of the seminar to their country defense ministers.  </span></p>
<p><span>The SLS is part of a SC J5 Security Cooperation Division effort to increase the effectiveness of all SOUTHCOM sponsored capacity building activities. </span></p><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
#### EVELYN CLARKE et al. v. JOSEPH F. WINEKE et al.

(Filed 27 September, 1939.)

1. Executors and Administrators § 12b—

Tbe provision of a will that testatrix’ executor should pay off mortgage indebtednesses on a particular tract of land out of the “further assets constituting my estate” does not empower the executor to sell other-lands of testatrix, even though the personalty is insufficient to pay off the encumbrances, and the executor may not sell such other lands except by court order upon his petition to make assets in compliance with the statute.

2. Pleadings § 23—

Where it is held on appeal that petitioner’s demurrer to the interplea was properly sustained, the interpleader may be permitted to recast his petition.

Appeal by interpleader from *Carr, J.,*at June Term, 1939, of Pasquotank.

*239Petition for partition.

Tbe plaintiffs and defendants are residuary legatees, or tbeir representatives, under tbe will of Adelaide A. "Wineke, late of Baltimore County, Maryland. Tbe lands sought to be partitioned are situate in Pasquotank County, North Carolina.

It is provided in tbe will of tbe deceased that if at tbe time of her death there should be a mortgage on her Camden and Light Street properties, situate in tbe city of Baltimore, “my executor shall pay off said mortgage out of tbe further assets constituting my estate.” There were four mortgages on these properties aggregating $40,000 at the time of the death of the testatrix, no part of the principal of which has since been paid. The further assets of the estate consist of personal property amounting to approximately $15,000, a home place and other properties in Baltimore valued at $11,000, and the lots situate in Pasquotank County here sought to be partitioned.

The executor, Jacob France, intervened and demanded the right to sell the lots in question under the will and apply the proceeds to the mortgages on the Camden and Light Street properties.

The petitioners interposed a demurrer to the interplea of the executor on the ground that “the provisions of the will are not sufficient to permit an order authorizing such sale by the executor unless the allegations in his petition are in compliance with the statute relating to the sale of property by an executor to make assets.” Demurrer sustained, and the interpleader appeals, assigning error.

*McMullan & McMullan for interpleader, appellant.*

*M. B. Simpson and R. M. Cann for petitioners, appellees.*

Stacy, C. J.

The will in question confers no power of sale on the executor as was the case in *Seagle v. Harris,*214 N. C., 339, 199 S. E., 271, cited and relied upon by appellant. It would seem, therefore, that the executor should proceed in the usual way to sell the “further assets” of the estate in order to pay the debts in accordance with the directions of the testatrix. *Neighbors v. Evans,*210 N. C., 550, 187 S. E., 796.

The demurrer was properly sustained, though the interpleader will doubtless be permitted to recast his petition. *Harris v. Board of Education, ante,*147.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Of 3SBio Inc.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of 3SBio Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jing Lou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 25, 2010



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|      
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/    DR. JING
LOU    
|Name:  |  | Dr. Jing Lou           
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

| Name of entity and place of jurisdiction                  |   | Voting SecuritiesOwned Percentage |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
| PennantPark SBIC GP, LLC (Delaware)                       |   | 100                               | %      |
| PennantPark SBIC GP II, LLC (Delaware)                    |   | 100                               | %      |
| PennantPark SBIC LP (Delaware)                            |   | 100                               | % (1)  |
| PennantPark SBIC II LP (Delaware)                         |   | 100                               | % (2)  |
| PNNT Alabama Holdings Inc. (Delaware)                     |   | 100                               | % (3)  |
| PNNT Cascade Environmental Holdings, LLC (Delaware)       |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT CI (GALLS) Prime Investment Holdings, LLC (Delaware) |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT ecoserve, LLC (Delaware)                             |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT Investment Holdings, LLC (Delaware)                  |   | 100                               | %      |
| PNNT New Gulf Resources, LLC (Delaware)                   |   | 100                               | %      |
| AKW Holdings Limited (Delaware)                           |   | 100                               | % (4)  |
| RAM Energy Holdings LLC (Delaware)                        |   | 100                               | % (4)  |
| Superior Digital Displays, LLC (Delaware)                 |   | 98                                | % (4)  |

 

| (1) | The entity is directly owned 99% by us and 1% by PennantPark SBIC GP, LLC which is effectively wholly-owned by us. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The entity is directly owned 99% by us and 1% by PennantPark SBIC GP II, LLC, which is effectively wholly-owned by us. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3) | This entity is not operational. |
|-----|---------------------------------|

| (4) | This is a controlled affiliated investment. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------|
----

|   | State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|--------|--------------------------------|

| Name of Entity | Incorporation or Organization |
|----------------|-------------------------------|

| 99¢ Only Stores Texas, Inc. | Delaware |
|----------------------------------|----------|

| 99¢ Only Stores | Nevada |
|----------------------|--------|

| 8966 Reseda Associates, LLC (50% owned) | California |
|-----------------------------------------|------------|

| REA Associates La Quinta, LLC (65% owned) | California |
|-------------------------------------------|------------|

| Wilshire Alvarado Associates, LLC (50% owned) | California |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT
COMPANY CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) FOR FEBRUARY 29, 2000
AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                             111
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                       101
<INVENTORY>                                     10,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,684
<PP&E>                                          19,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,271
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,597
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,090)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,233
<SALES>                                         36,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,739
<CGS>                                           27,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,060
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,927
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,927
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43


</TABLE>
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	U.S. Naval Officer Leads Drug Seizure while Aboard Dutch Warship
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">U.S. Naval Officer Leads Drug Seizure while Aboard Dutch Warship</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Michael Hendricks</b> <span class="date">/ Published Jan. 15, 2018</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>CARIBBEAN SEA (NNS) -- U.S. Navy Lt. Ben Hondrum, a Personnel Exchange Program (PEP) officer assigned to Dutch naval warship HNLMS Zeeland, led two boarding teams during a drug interdiction Oct. 29.</p>
<p>The Zeeland had just begun their return transit to homeport in the Netherlands after five months when they received intelligence of a high speed "go fast" vessel departing Venezuela heading north.</p>
<p>The Zeeland altered course to intercept the vessel. While en route to the intercept point, Hondrum briefed the two boarding teams before loading the Fast Raiding Intercept Special Forces Craft (FRISC). </p>
<p>"I was excited for the opportunity to do what we had trained for in a real-world situation," added Hondrum. "I was the boarding officer and am responsible for the safe navigation and execution of my teams in these situations, while en route to the intercept point; my teams and I went over the scenario and explored some 'what-if' situations in order to really prepare ourselves."</p>
<p>After warning shots were not heeded, all three outboard motors of the "go fast vessel" were disabled, allowing the boarding teams to close in on its location and board the vessel. The boarding teams apprehended three suspects, found 15 packages of cocaine onboard and with the assistance of the helicopter, recovered 12 more that were jettisoned. A total of 1,300 kilograms of cocaine were seized with an estimated street value of $30 million USD.</p>
<p>The Zeeland sank the smuggler's vessel since it was a hazard to navigation. The smugglers and the cocaine were turned over to the Dutch coast guard authorities in Willemstad, Curacao, Oct. 30.</p>
<p>For more information, visit www.navy.mil, www.facebook.com/usnavy, or www.twitter.com/usnavy.</p>
<p>For more news from U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command & U.S. 4th Fleet, visit www.navy.mil/local/cusns/. </p><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

LAWRENCE A. JACOBSON, SBN 057393

SEAN M. JACOBSON, SBN 227241

COHEN AND JACOBSON, LLP

66 Bovet Road, Suite 285

San Mateo, CA 94402

Telephone: (650) 261-6280

laj@cohenandjacobson.com

Attorneys for Amir Shahmirza

(Agent for Komir, Inc.) and Komir, Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION,

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

COMPANY,

Debtors.

G Affects PG&E Corporation

G Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

O Affects both Debtors

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case) (Jointly Administered)

DECLARATION OF LAWRENCE A.

JACOBSON IN SUPPORT OF

OPPOSITION TO COUNTER-MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY PG&E

Date: April 11, 2023

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Place: (Tele/Videoconference Appearances

Only)

United States Bankruptcy Court

Courtroom 17, 16th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

DECLARATION OF LAWRENCE A. JACOBSON IN SUPPORT OF 

OPPOSITION TO COUNTER-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY PG&E 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13654-2 Filed: 04/03/23 Entered: 04/03/23 16:38:58 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

I, Lawrence A. Jacobson, declare:

1. I am one of the attorneys for Claimant herein and make this Declaration in Support of

Opposition to Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment:

2. On various dates, including this date, Declarant reviewed the Creditor List in the

PG&E Case No. 01-30923 on PACER.

3. I did not locate on the Creditor List the name of Komir; Amir Shahmirza; Shahmirza,

Amir; Neil Hildebrand; Hildebrand, Neil; Melanie Hildebrand; or Hildebrand, Melanie.

4. I also searched in the Claims Register for any Proof of Claim by any of the persons

identified in paragraph 3 above and found none.

I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and can competently testify thereto.

Executed at Burlingame, California, on the 3rd day of April, 2023.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing

is true and correct.

 /s/ Lawrence A. Jacobson 

 Lawrence A. Jacobson

DECLARATION OF LAWRENCE A. JACOBSON IN SUPPORT OF 

OPPOSITION TO COUNTER-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY PG&E 2

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13654-2 Filed: 04/03/23 Entered: 04/03/23 16:38:58 Page 2

of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BRUCE A. QUARLES,

 Petitioner

 v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 185 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### JAMES T. LANE, Respondent, *v.*ROSWELL C. WILLIAMS and Others, Appellants.

*Bill of pa/rticulars*— *when not allowed in an action for malicious prosecution.*

In an action to recover damages for a malicious prosecution the defendants were-charged with having used a debt which they held, to procure an attachment against the plaintiff, whereby his credit and business were injured. The-defendants applied for a bill of particulars “ of the persons who refused to-give him (the plaintiff) credit, as alleged in the amended complaint; the amount of credit refused; the damages sustained by each of said refusals; the time when such credit was refused,” and also the name of each person who stopped dealing with the plaintiff, and the amount of credit lost by each person.

*Held,*that the application was properly denied.

Appeal from an order, made at a Special Term, denying a motion to compel the plaintiff to furnish the defendants with a bill of particulars.

*JBcmks <&*Henderson, for the appellants.

*Marbm J.*Keogh, for the respondent.

Barnard, P. J.:

This is an action to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. The defendants are charged with maliciously using a debt which they held against the plaintiff to procure an attachment whereby plaintiff’s credit and business was injured. The defendants apply for a bill of particular's “of the person who refused to give him credit, as alleged in the said amended complaint; the-*389amount of credit refused; the damages sustained by each of said refusals; the time when such credit was refused,” and also the “ name of each person who stopped dealing with the plaintiff,” and the amount of custom lost by each person. The application was properly denied. The action does not depend upon proof of these particulars. The basis of it is malice and lack of probable ■cause to sue out the attachment. Loss of business, which is incident to the same, is a proper averment, if damage and proof thereof is admissible on the trial. It does not thereby become the subject of a bill of particulars. As well order a bill of particulars of the good and worthy citizens in a slander action, who respected the plaintiff before the slander and of those who did not so esteem him after the alleged publication. An averment of loss of character and business is a common result of malicious acts, and, therefore, may be charged as the result in fact in the plaintiff’s pleading. Such an averment may be sustained by proof of the malicious act, without proof of specific instances. In the present case the defendants have a very full examination of the plaintiff upon the subject of loss of custom and credit, and the bill of particulars is practically unnecessary, if otherwise proper.

The order should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Peatt, J., concurred; DykmaN, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
#### Harry J. Taggart, Respondent, v. Abram Wakeman, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.