alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                       222
<INVENTORY>                                      8,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,503
<PP&E>                                          18,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,418
<BONDS>                                          7,674
<COMMON>                                        16,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,771
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,121)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,081
<SALES>                                          8,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,679
<CGS>                                            6,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (416)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    519
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                519
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3661    Filed: 08/22/19    Entered: 08/22/19 13:37:17    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 3661    Filed: 08/22/19    Entered: 08/22/19 13:37:17    Page 2 of2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5026 

To prohibit closing or repurposing any propagation fish hatchery or aquatic 

species propagation program of the Department of the Interior unless 

such action is expressly authorized by an Act of Congress, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2014 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. ROE

of Tennessee, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. MICHAUD) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit closing or repurposing any propagation fish 

hatchery or aquatic species propagation program of the 

Department of the Interior unless such action is expressly authorized by an Act of Congress, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fish Hatchery Protec5 tion Act’’. 


tjames@gpo.gov on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5026 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CLOSING PROPAGATION FISH 

2 HATCHERIES OR REPURPOSING PRIORITIES 

3 FOR PROPAGATION PROGRAMS. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary of the Interior 

5 may not permanently close, reprogram, repurpose, decom6 mission, significantly alter, or move to caretaker status 

7 any fish and other aquatic species propagation hatchery 

8 or propagation program within the National Fish Hatch9 ery System of the Department of the Interior unless such 

10 action is expressly authorized by an Act of Congress. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE PERIOD.—This section shall be effec12 tive during the period beginning November 1, 2013, and 

13 ending upon the expiration of the 10-year period begin14 ning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames@gpo.gov on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 15, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 15, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0193. KHIRY HAKIM CLEMONS v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2023SUCR537
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: dchambers Date Created: 6/18/2019

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 5

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

aty Paul J. Pascuzzi ppascuzzi@ffwplaw.com

aty Tobias S. Keller tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com

TOTAL: 2

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Prime Clerk):

HONG−AN N. TRAN, ESQ. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 201 Redwood Shores

Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065

MATTHEW J. OLSON, ESQ. Macdonald Fernandez LLP 221 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA

94104

SETH I. ROSENBERG, ESQ. Emergent LLP 5 Third Street, #1000 San Francisco, CA 94103

TOTAL: 3

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2491-3 Filed: 06/12/19 Entered: 06/12/19 07:14:52 Page 1

of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from HCW Pension
Real Estate fund Limited Partnership 1999 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745538
<NAME> HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      505
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (45)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          16,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,772
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,309
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (15)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.96)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Alfred B. Smith and Another, Executors, etc., of Margaret J. Myers.

Decree affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

All concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5036 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to extend expiring provisions of 

the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. COBLE (for himself and Mr. GOODLATTE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to extend expiring 

provisions of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Satellite Television Ac5 cess Reauthorization Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

7 Chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) in section 111(d)(3)— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 5036 IH

1 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 

2 (A), by striking ‘‘clause’’ and inserting ‘‘para3 graph’’; and 

4 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

5 ‘‘clause’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph’’; and 

6 (2) in section 119— 

7 (A) in subsection (c)(1)(E), by striking 

8 ‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’; and 

9 (B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘2014’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 

11 SEC. 3. TERMINATION OF LICENSE. 

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 119 of title 17, United 

13 States Code, as amended in section 2, is amended by add14 ing at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(h) TERMINATION OF LICENSE.—This section shall 

16 cease to be effective on December 31, 2019.’’. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 107(a) of 

18 the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 

19 2010 (17 U.S.C. 119 note) is repealed. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 11, 2023

NO. 03-23-00264-CV

Davario Pegram, Appellant

v.

Britney Johnson, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment by the trial court on April 12, 2023. Having reviewed the 

record, the Court holds that Davario Pegram has not prosecuted his appeal and did not comply 

with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of 

prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the 

court below.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a market structure roundtable on 
Wednesday, June 2, 2010 at 9:30 a.m., in the Auditorium at SEC 
headquarters at 100 F Street, NE. in Washington, DC. The roundtable 
will be open to the public with seating on a first-come, first-served 
basis. Visitors will be subject to security checks.
    The roundtable discussion will focus on key market structure 
issues, including high-frequency trading, undisplayed liquidity, and 
the appropriate metrics for evaluating market structure performance.
    For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: May 26, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13006 Filed 5-26-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
[662 NE2d 250, 638 NYS2d 932]

#### In the Matter of Audrey Bickwid, Respondent, v Steven H. Deutsch, Appellant.

Argued November 29,1995;

decided December 21, 1995

*863APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Schapiro & Reich,*Lindenhurst *(Perry S. Reich, Steven M. Schapiro*and *Wilma Kerner Miller,*of counsel), for appellant.

Respondent, precluded.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the proceeding remitted to the Appellate Division for a determination on the merits.

Appellant, an accountant and expert witness by profession, and his wife were married in 1966 and have four children. In 1985, appellant and his wife were divorced and appellant agreed to pay child support of $1,000 per month. In 1989, appellant applied for a downward modification in child support on the ground that one of his children had turned 21 and another was living with him. Appellant’s former wife, in turn, cross-moved for an upward modification. Appellant’s former wife prevailed and appellant was ordered to pay $47,000 in arrears. Appellant apparently paid approximately half that amount, but claimed inability to pay the remainder.

In July 1992 appellant’s former wife commenced a contempt proceeding in Family Court as a result of appellant’s failure to pay in full. Family Court adjudicated appellant in contempt and appellant was sentenced to 48 days in jail which he served. In the meantime, appellant had successfully appealed from the upward modification which was reversed by the Appellate Division in December 1993 (199 AD2d 1087). Appellant now seeks to appeal the contempt adjudication.

Inasmuch as enduring consequences potentially flow from an order adjudicating a party in civil contempt, an appeal from that order is not rendered moot simply because the resulting prison sentence has already been served *(Matter of Williams v Cornelius,*76 NY2d 542). Though civil contempt does not have the same harsh consequences as the summary criminal contempt adjudication at issue in *Williams,*many of the policy concerns that motivated our decision there are applicable here *{id.,*at 546-547). In fact, given appellant’s occasional engagement as a forensic accountant and expert witness, "the *864adjudication could no doubt be used to attack [his] credibility * * * in a court of law” *(id.,*at 546) thus jeopardizing his professional reputation and means of earning a living.

Contrary to appellant’s urging, however, we do not reach the merits of his arguments as to the impropriety of the civil contempt adjudication *(see,*Family Ct Act §§ 453-455). In *Williams,*we rejected a similar request in order to give both parties an "opportunity to answer on the merits” *(id.,*at 547).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur; Judge Titone taking no part.

Order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2007-F-0330] (formerly Docket No. 2007F-0454)

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive petition (FAP 7M4770) proposing that the food additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of ultraviolet radiation for the reduction of pathogens and other microorganisms in aqueous sugar solutions and potable water intended for use in food production.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laura A. Dye, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 301-436-1275.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In a notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of                           ( print page 30845)                        December 3, 2007 (72 FR 67943), FDA announced that a food additive petition (FAP 7M4770) had been filed by General Mills, Inc., One General Mills Blvd., Minneapolis, MN 55426. The petition proposed to amend the food additive regulations in § 179.39                     *Ultraviolet radiation for the processing and treatment of food*                     (21 CFR 170.39) to provide for the safe use of ultraviolet radiation for the reduction of pathogens and other microorganisms in aqueous sugar solutions and potable water intended for use in food production. General Mills, Inc., has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 171.7).                

Dated: May 26, 2010.

Mitchell A. Cheeseman,

Acting Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

[FR Doc. 2010-13131 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLINTON HITNER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 479 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         255,521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (34,500)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               430,920
<PP&E>                                      12,676,580
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,290,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,816,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          404,224
<BONDS>                                      8,212,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,816,591
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               452,615
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,407)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,407)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3401-2 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 08:35:04 Page 1

of 2
COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR 

SERVICES RENDERED BY KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

JUNE 1, 2019 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019 

TASK 

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT 

002 Omnibus & Miscellaneous Court Appearances 107.7 $34,300 

003 Legal Research 1.7 $680 

004 General Case Administration 33.3 $13,090 

005 Automatic Stay Proceedings 27.4 $18,120 

006 Initial Debtor Interview, Meeting of Creditors, Creditor Inquiries 4.7 $3,015 

007 Professional Retention and Compensation – Keller & Benvenutti 19.2 $9,800 

008 Professional Retention and Compensation – Other Professionals 28.7 $18,720 

009 Financing and Cash Collateral .9 $720 

014 Employee Matters 11.9 $7,505 

015 Supplier Issues 5.6 $3,385 

016 General Asset Analysis and Recovery .4 $305 

018 Executory Contract Issues 4.2 $2,555 

021 Plan – Advice, Strategy and Negotiation 1.9 $1,355 

025 FERC Adversary Proceeding 8.6 $5,825 

026 Wildfire Litigation 2 $1,315 

027 Claims Review 11.7 $7,605 

034 Third Party Injunction Action (PERA) 15.8 $9,400 

035 Government Relations and Communications .2 $160 

036 Miscellaneous Litigation Issues and Advice 29.4 $16,910 

TOTAL 315.3 $154,765 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 3401-2 Filed: 08/07/19 Entered: 08/07/19 08:35:04 Page 2

of 2
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Susan Cobb, Deceased.

That portion of the decree appealed from is reversed and decree modified accordingly, without costs. Opinion by

Bradley, J.
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Simon G. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Simon G. Thomas Simon G. Thomas Chief Financial Officer Date: April 15, 2011
#### In the Matter of Diane Willard, Respondent, v Town Board of the Town of Hamburg et al., Appellants.

Submitted November 13,1995;

decided January 16, 1996

Motion, insofar as appellant Kesner seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the denial of appellant Kesner’s motion for renewal, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion by appellant Kesner for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion by appellant Town Board of the Town of Hamburg for leave to appeal denied.