alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Net Talk.com, Inc. a Florida corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Guillermo
Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Guillermo RodriguezGuillermo
      RodriguezChief Financial
      Officer
              (Principal Financial
      and Accounting Officer)Date:  December
      14, 2009
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HA R J IND E RS ING H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 70102 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 246- 742 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 12, 2013 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , R E IN H A R D T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H ar j i nde rS i ngh, anat i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen r e m ova lpr oc e e di ngs . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED MA R 20 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 70102 2 an ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . T

ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 5 3 8 F .3 d9 8 8 , 9 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng S i ng h’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov erthree ye ar s a ft erthe B IA ’ s f i nalorder, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , and S i ngh f a i l e d t o pr e s e nts uf

f i c i e nte vi de nc e of c h an g e dc i r c u ms t an c e s i n I n d i at o qu a l i f yf o rth e r e g u l at o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me l i m i tfor f

i l i ng m ot i on s t o reopen, and w here an af fi davi tpres ent ed by S i ng h fai l ed to o v e r c o m e th e im m ig r atio n ju d g e ’s p r io ra d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityf in d in g , se e 8 C. F. R. § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; T

ouf i ghi , 538 F . 3d at996- 97 ( pe t i t i one rf a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h a pr i m af a c i e c a s e f

orr e l i e f i n l i ghtof

the i m m i gr at i on j udge ’ s c onc l us i ve f i ndi ngs on hi s und er l yi ng cl ai m ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          373017
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1387
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                414661
<PP&E>                          6913664
<DEPRECIATION>                  3316164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4029759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           181091
<BONDS>                         3835364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      13304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4029759
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1599456
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   808277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                139338
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              405937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             5088334
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    5088334
<EPS-BASIC>                   204.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                   204.42



</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 28, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00634-CV 

IN RE SANDRA CRENSHAW, Relator 

On Appeal from Dallas County, Texas 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek 

Opinion by Justice Reichek 

Relator Sandra Crenshaw has been declared a vexatious litigant and is prohibited from 

filing pro se any new litigation in a court of this State without first obtaining permission from the 

local administrative judge. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 11.102(a), 11.103(a). A 

petition for writ of mandamus is a civil action for which the vexatious litigant statute applies. 

Cooper v. McNulty, No. 05-15-00801-CV, 2016 WL 6093999, at *3 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 19, 

2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Retzlaff v. GoAmerica Commc’ns Corp., 356 S.W.3d 689, 700 

(Tex. App.—El Paso 2011, no pet.) (concluding under statutory definitions, “a person who seeks 

mandamus relief commences a civil action in the appellate court”)); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. &

REM. CODE ANN. § 11.001(2) (defining “litigation” as “a civil action commenced, maintained, or 

pending in any state or federal court.”); Id. § 11.103(a) (the clerk of a court “may not file a 

litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented, pro se, by a vexatious litigant 

subject to a prefiling order” unless the litigant first obtains permission). 
 –2– 

Crenshaw filed this original proceeding without first obtaining the required permission. 

By letter dated June 3, 2019, we ordered Crenshaw to file a copy of an order from the local 

administrative judge giving her permission to file this original proceeding by June 13, 2019. We 

cautioned Crenshaw that failure to provide the written verification of permission to file may result 

in dismissal of this original proceeding for want of jurisdiction without further notice. 

To date, relator has not provided this Court with a written order from the local 

administrative judge giving relator permission to file this original proceeding. Accordingly, we 

dismiss this original proceeding for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. 

§ 11.1035(b) (the court “shall dismiss the litigation unless the [vexatious litigant subject to a 

prefiling order] . . . obtains an order from the appropriate local administrative judge described by 

Section 11.102(a) permitting the filing of the litigation”); see also In re Johnson, No. 03-13-00531-

CV, 2013 WL 4822489, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 30, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) 

(dismissing petition for writ of mandamus when vexatious-litigant relator made no showing that 

he had obtained order from local administrative judge permitting filing thereof); TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3(a), 43.2(f). 

190634F.P05 

/Amanda L. Reichek/ 

AMANDA L. REICHEK 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Consolidated Statement 
of Operations for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 1998, and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>              Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                         $ 1,506
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                    9,498
<ALLOWANCES>                        85
<INVENTORY>                      6,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                19,795
<PP&E>                           4,305
<DEPRECIATION>                   2,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  27,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           12,145
<BONDS>                              0
<COMMON>                         1,715
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<OTHER-SE>                       8,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    27,770
<SALES>                         11,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                11,556
<CGS>                            9,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    9,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    25
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (422)
<INCOME-TAX>                        70
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (492)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                      (492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         2,710
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  73,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,636
<INVENTORY>                                    21,827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               99,559
<PP&E>                                         173,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 81,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          52,859
<BONDS>                                        44,903
<COMMON>                                       3,935
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,176
<SALES>                                        85,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               85,835
<CGS>                                          65,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  65,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (23)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,649
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,736
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (795)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .26
        


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5052 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to protect and conserve 

species and the lawful possession of certain ivory in the United States, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2014 

Mr. DAINES (for himself and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to protect 

and conserve species and the lawful possession of certain 

ivory in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lawful Ivory Protec5 tion Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 

7 1973. 

8 Section 11(f) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

9 (16 U.S.C. 1540(f)) is amended— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5052 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after the subsection 

2 heading; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided in this paragraph, regula5 tions promulgated under paragraph (1), including policies, 

6 orders, or practices pursuant to such regulations, may 

7 not— 

8 ‘‘(i) prohibit or restrict the possession, sale, de9 livery, receipt, shipping, or transportation, within 

10 the United States, of elephant ivory that has been 

11 lawfully imported into the United States; 

12 ‘‘(ii) change any methods of, or standards for, 

13 determining if such ivory has been lawfully imported 

14 that were in effect on February 24, 2014, including 

15 any applicable presumptions and burdens of proof 

16 with respect to such determinations; 

17 ‘‘(iii) prohibit or restrict the importation of 

18 such ivory that was lawfully importable into the 

19 United States on February 24, 2014; or 

20 ‘‘(iv) prohibit or restrict the possession of such 

21 ivory that was lawfully possessable in the United 

22 States on February 24, 2014. 

23 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to regulations, 

24 including policies, orders, or practices pursuant to such 

25 regulations, that were in effect on February 24, 2014. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5052 IH

1 ‘‘(C) Regulations promulgated under paragraph (1), 

2 including policies, orders, or practices pursuant to such 

3 regulations, that became effective during the period begin4 ning on February 25, 2014, and ending on the date of 

5 enactment of this paragraph, shall be revised, as nec6 essary, to comply with the requirements specified in sub7 paragraph (A) for regulations promulgated after such date 

8 of enactment.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
-------------------

Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
November 12, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
EXHIBIT E

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1933-5 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 15:50:06 Page 1

of 2
650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

Email: admin@kellerbenvenutti.com

Billing Statement No. 1084

Date: 05/07/2019

Due Upon Receipt

PG&E Corporation

Attn: Janet Loduca

77 Beale Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

00138-31 PG&E

Chapter 11 representation- Expenses

Type Date Description Quantity Rate Fees and

Expenses

Total

Expense 03/01/2019 eScribers Inv # 233776 Transcription 2.27.2019 Hearing 1.00 $653.40 $653.40

Expense 03/01/2019 eScribers Inv # 233784 Transcription 2.27.2019 Hearing 1.00 $514.25 $514.25

Expense 03/07/2019 eScribers Inv # 235330 Transcription 3.4.19 Hearing 1.00 $532.40 $532.40

Expense 03/11/2019 Clear Discovery LLC Inv #0001089 Copy and Printing services for

hearings on 3/12/19 and 3/13/19

1.00 $6,500.14 $6,500.14

Expense 03/12/2019 eScribers, Transcription, Inv # 236018 1.00 $84.70 $84.70

Expense 03/13/2019 eScribers, Transcription, Invoice # 236277 1.00 $72.60 $72.60

Expense 03/14/2019 eScribers, Transcription, Invoice # 236833 1.00 $1,234.20 $1,234.20

Expense 03/28/2019 Clear Discovery Invoice 0001102, dated 03.28.2019 for printing binders for

03.26.2019 Omnibus Hearing

1.00 $1,154.53 $1,154.53

Expense 03/28/2019 Clear Discovery Invoice 0001102, dated 03.28.2019 for printing binders for

03.26.2019 Omnibus Hearing

1.00 $314.01 $314.01

Expense 03/29/2019 Pay Nationwide Legal Invoice 355664 for Court runners 3/11 and 3/15 1.00 $59.00 $59.00

Time Keeper Time Rate Fees and Expenses

Total

Fees and Expenses Subtotal $11,119.23

Fees and Expenses Total $11,119.23

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1933-5 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 15:50:06 Page 2

of 2
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------


                             CityFed Financial Corp.
              Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss



                                                         Six months ended
                                                         ----------------
                                                             June 30,
                                                             --------
                                                       2005            2004
                                                   -----------     -----------
Computation of Loss Per Share:


Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding                                       28,716,134      28,716,134

Loss applicable to common stock (1) :              $(4,527,000)    $(4,442,000)
                                                   -----------     -----------

Basic and diluted loss per common share:           $     (0.16)    $     (0.15)
                                                   -----------     -----------



1. Losses applicable to Common Stock includes unpaid preferred stock dividends
for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 in the amount of $4,557,000 in
both periods.
# U n i ted S t a te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 13-1093 September Term, 2014 EPA-78FR66 74 Filed O n: July 21, 2 015 Delaware Depa rtme nt o f Natu ral Resou rces and En v ironm ent al Con trol,

Pet itione r
v . Environme nta l Prote ction Agency,

Respo nde nt

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Electric Po wer Su pply Associat ion, et a l.,

Inte rveno rs

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Conso lidate d with 13-1 102 , 13 -110 4 BEFORE: Garlan d, Ch ief Jud ge; W illiams a nd Rand olph , Se nior Circuit Judges O R D E R Upon con siderat ion o f

respo nde nt’s u nop pose d p etition for pa nel re hea ring, it is ORDERED tha t th e o pinion , Delaware Department o f Natu ral Resou rces an d Environ m ental Con trol v. EPA , 78 5 F.3 d 1 (D.C. Cir. 201 5), b e a me nde d a s follows: Sect ion V I., p . 18 , de lete the f irst sent ence of the f irst ¶, a nd insert in lieu t here of : W e reverse th e ch allenged rules t hatcon tain the 10 0-ho ur exemp tion for ope ration of

em ergency engines for pu rpose s of em ergency dem and respo nse und er the Nation al Em issions S tan dard s, 40 C.F.R. § 63 .66 40(f )(2)(i i)-( iii) , an d th e Performa nce Sta nda rds, 4 0 C.F.R. §§ 60. 421 1(f )(2)(i i)-( iii) , 60 .42 43(d )(2)(i i)-( iii)

. T he Clerk is directed to issue t he am end ed opin ion a nd to a me nd the judgm ent issued May 1, 20 15, to ref lect th is am end me nt. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Ken Mead ows Depu ty Cl erk
Exhibit 33.3
                                  ------------

          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 6 ,

2012

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00188

- CR

ELTON BAZILE, JR. , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10

- DCR

- 055028



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A written request to withdraw the notice of appeal, personally signed by appellant,
has been filed with this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s request.
Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the clerk of the court to issue the mandate of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
No. 1243, Misc.

#### Duke *v.*Superintendent, State Hospital No. 1.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.
Signed and Filed: June 21, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

June 24, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2719 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/24/19 07:47:24 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2719 Filed: 06/21/19 Entered: 06/24/19 07:47:24 Page 2 of

2