alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5085 

To provide for the issuance of a Families of Fallen Heroes Semipostal 

Stamp. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2014 

Ms. ESTY (for herself and Mr. COOK) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in 

addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a Families of Fallen Heroes 

Semipostal Stamp. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support the Families 

5 of Fallen Heroes Semipostal Stamp Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FAMILIES OF FALLEN HEROES SEMIPOSTAL STAMP. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to afford a convenient 

8 way for members of the public to contribute to funding 

9 for programs benefitting the families of fallen service 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5085 IH

1 members, the United States Postal Service shall issue a 

2 semipostal stamp (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Families 

3 of Fallen Heroes Semipostal Stamp’’) in accordance with 

4 the provisions of this section. 

5 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The issuance and sale of the 

7 Families of Fallen Heroes Semipostal Stamp under 

8 this section shall be governed by the provisions of 

9 section 416 of title 39, United States Code, and reg10 ulations issued under such section, subject to the re11 quirements of this subsection. 

12 (2) DURATION.—The Families of Fallen Heroes 

13 Semipostal Stamp shall be made available to the 

14 public for a period of 4 years, beginning no later 

15 than 12 months after the date of the enactment of 

16 this Act. 

17 (3) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS.—After costs 

18 have been recovered by the United States Postal 

19 Service pursuant to section 416(d)(5) of title 39, 

20 United States Code, any amounts becoming available 

21 from the sale of the Families of Fallen Heroes 

22 Semipostal Stamp (as determined under section 

23 416(d) of such title) shall be transferred, through 

24 payments which shall be made at least twice a year, 

25 as follows: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5085 IH

1 (A) 50 percent of such amounts shall be 

2 transferred to the Tragedy Assistance Program 

3 for Survivors. 

4 (B) 50 percent of such amounts shall be 

5 transferred to the Families of the Fallen sup6 port program of the United Service Organiza7 tions, Inc. 

8 (4) AGENCIES.—The Tragedy Assistance Pro9 gram for Survivors and Families of the Fallen sup10 port program of the United Service Organizations, 

11 Inc., shall be deemed to be agencies for purposes of 

12 applying section 416(d)(1) of title 39, United States 

13 Code. 

14 (c) DEFINITION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘semipostal 

15 stamp’’ refers to a stamp described in section 416(a)(1) 

16 of title 39, United States Code. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00435

- CR

Andre SCALES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR8106

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 19, 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 282 Filed: 02/04/19 Entered: 02/04/19 16:41:49 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 282 Filed: 02/04/19 Entered: 02/04/19 16:41:49 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 282 Filed: 02/04/19 Entered: 02/04/19 16:41:49 Page 3 of 3
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5142 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 113 West Jackson Street in Rich Square, 

North Carolina, as the ‘‘Chief Joseph E. White, Jr. 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5142 EH

1 SECTION 1. CHIEF JOSEPH E. WHITE, JR. POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 113 West Jackson Street in Rich 

5 Square, North Carolina, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Chief Joseph E. White, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chief Joseph E. 

11 White, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5142 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postseph E. White, Jr. Post Office Building’’. Rich Square, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Chief Jo- al Service located at 113 West Jackson Street in
#### National Bank of Orange County, Plaintiff, v. Ida D. Van Steinburgh, Defendant.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer in twenty days on payment of costs according to stipulation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

# ACTION:

Notice to cancel EAC public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Election Assistance Commission has cancelled the EAC Public Meeting scheduled for Thursday, May 27, 2010, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. EDT. The meeting was announced in a sunshine notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, May 21, 2010 in Volume 75, Number 98.                    

# Person to Contact for Information:

 Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-13115 Filed 5-27-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00294- CV
Sergio G ardea, Appellant

v. GMAC Mor tgage, LLC Successorby Merge r to G MAC M ortgage Corporat ion,

Its Successor and/or Assigns, App ellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 4 O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY NO. 12- 1552 -CC4, HO NORAB LE JO HN Mc MASTER, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Serg io Gar dea has filed a n otice of bankruptc y . See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. We there fore suspend this app ea l until a party files a motion to reinstate or a motion to
sever . See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2, 8
. 3
. Appellant is order ed to inform this Court of the resolution of the bankruptc y proce eding or some other event that would allow this appea l to be reinstated. Should appellant fail to provide such notice, the appea l will b e s ub j ec t to dismiss al for want of prosec ution on this Court’s or anothe r par ty ’s motion. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b), ( c).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Ba nkruptcy Filed: Oc tober 25, 2013
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

s1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141208

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141208 COA: 291817 Ingham CC: 08-000903 JEREMY EUGENE RAILER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Stewart’s Estate.

*Decedents’ estates*— Claim *for services■*— Auditor’s *report*— Findings *of fact*— ■ *Evidence.*

The finding by an auditor that a decedent had employed her brother to take charge of her affairs, and that his services were worth the sum which he claimed, will not be reversed where such finding is based on sufficient evidence and is confirmed by the court below, and no manifest error is made to appear.

Argued May 16, 1905.

Appeal, No. 1, March T., 1904, by *261Mary J. Gallagher* from decree of O. C. Lycoming Co., dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in Estate of Ann E. Stewart, deceased.

Before Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Exceptions to report of H. W. Whitehead, Esq., auditor.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

*Error assigned*was in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.

*Thomas M. B.*Hieles, for appellant.

*W. 0.*Gilmore, for appellee.

October 9, 1905:

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The finding of an auditor approved by the court below will be sustained on appeal if there is any evidence which warrants it: Fessenden’s Estate, 170 Pa. 631. Applying this rule to the pending case, the appellant is called upon to make it appear that there was no evidence to justify the auditor in his conclusion that the accountant was entitled to compensation for services rendered to the decedent at her request, and that the amount charged was reasonable. There is direct and positive evidence that James S. Stewart, who was a brother of the decedent, had been living for several years in California, and that he returned to Lycoming county after his sister was hurt, to take charge of her business at her request and that he had charge of her affairs during the remainder of her life. There is also evidence that his services were worth the sum charged therefor. The auditor’s conclusion is not only supported by evidence but by the weight of competent evidence on these propositions. The witnesses were before him, their character and credibility were subjects for his consideration. The very earnest argument of the appellant’s counsel has not convinced us that the evidence did not warrant the action of the auditor. The decree is, therefore, affirmed.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 465 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5162 

[Report No. 113–624] 

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to allow a certain parcel of land in 

Rockingham County, Virginia, to be used for a child care center’’ to 

remove the use restriction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2014 

Mr. GOODLATTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 17, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5162 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to allow a certain parcel 

of land in Rockingham County, Virginia, to be used 

for a child care center’’ to remove the use restriction, 

and for other purposes. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5162 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION. 

4 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to allow a certain parcel 

5 of land in Rockingham County, Virginia, to be used for 

6 a child care center’’, approved October 31, 1990 (Public 

7 Law 101–479), is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any restrictions 

10 in the deed, on and after the date of the enactment of 

11 this Act, the parcel comprised of approximately 3.03 acres 

12 of land transferred by the United States on April 11, 

13 1989, to the county of Rockingham, Virginia, in deed book 

14 number 953 at page 600, together with improvements 

15 thereon may be used by the county as if the land had been 

16 transferred in fee simple with no use or other restrictions. 

17 ‘‘(b) DOCUMENTATION.—As soon as practical after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

19 the Interior shall take such actions as are necessary to 

20 issue a fee simple deed with no restrictions to the land 

21 described in subsection (a) to the county of Rockingham, 

22 Virginia.’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 465 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5162 

[Report No. 113–624] 

A BILL 

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to allow a cermove the use restriction, and for other purposes. ginia, to be used for a child care center’’ to re- tain parcel of land in Rockingham County, VirNOVEMBER 17, 2014 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00124

- CR

Ex parte Jeffery Pool §

§

§

§

§ From the 30th District Court

of Wichita County (187,799

- A)

August 16, 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

( nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dism issed for

want of jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

C hief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

URBIN INCORPORATED

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

URBIN INCORPORATED

596 DELLBROOK AVENUE

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131

ATTN: JONATHAN MANZO

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: July 1, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule/Claim No. Creditor Name Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F Urbin Incorporated $53,616.00 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Claim No. 3055 Urbin Incorporated $53,616.25 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2809 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 14:24:22 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2809 Filed: 07/01/19 Entered: 07/01/19 14:24:22 Page 2 of

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 30, 1996 (Unaudited)
and the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Three Months
ended November 30, 1996 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                       SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                               1,377,898
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        4,601,610
<ALLOWANCES>                            96,161
<INVENTORY>                          4,542,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    10,610,688
<PP&E>                               3,969,962
<DEPRECIATION>                       1,418,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      15,286,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                3,593,230
<BONDS>                                      0
<COMMON>                             1,615,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                 92
<OTHER-SE>                           9,943,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        15,286,761
<SALES>                              9,705,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     9,705,486
<CGS>                                7,507,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        7,507,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     3,540,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      59,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (1,388,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,388,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,388,858)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.10)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 31511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-44: OTS No. H-4704]


Oneida Financial Corp., Oneida, NY; Approval of Conversion 
Application

    Notice is hereby given that on May 14, 2010, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision approved the application of Oneida Financial, MHC and 
Oneida Savings Bank, Oneida, New York, to convert to the stock form of 
organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by 
appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6b693848a8f85c8af888089a6a9b2b5c8b294838795c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="366643545a5f55187f5850597679626518624453574518515940">[email protected]</span></a>) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Northeast Regional Office, 
Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, NJ 
07311.

    Dated: May 26, 2010.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-13209 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Matter of Probate of Will of Augustus Nelson, Deceased.

— Order admitting will to probate affirmed, with costs to he paid by appellants. Opinion by

Dykman, J
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2667

To designate the Washington Opera in Washington, D.C., as the National

Opera.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25, 2000

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. JEFFORDS,

Mr. ROBB, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To designate the Washington Opera in Washington, D.C.,

as the National Opera.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Washington Opera, organized under the laws of

5 the District of Columbia, is designated as the ‘‘National

6 Opera’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Wash-
2

•S 2667 IS

1 ington Opera referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to

2 be a reference to the ‘‘National Opera’’.

Æ
32(ii)
------
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
         the Company.




/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
-------------------------------------------------
Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
May 8, 2008


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended  Quarterly  Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James A. Hayward, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in
                all material respects,  the  financial   condition and result of
                operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Applied  DNA  Sciences,  Inc.  and will be  retained by Applied DNA
Sciences,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date:  October 10, 2006                              By: /s/JAMES A HAYWARD
                                                        -------------------
                                                     James A. Hayward
                                                     Principal Financial Officer