alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5086 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5086

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 10, 2014

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 
Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating the Chief 
     Standing Bear National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF STANDING BEAR NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY 
              STUDY.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 
U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(__) Chief standing bear national historic trail.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Chief Standing Bear Trail, 
                extending approximately 550 miles from Niobrara, 
                Nebraska, to Ponca City, Oklahoma, which follows the 
                route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca people 
                during Federal Indian removal, and approximately 550 
                miles from Ponca City, Oklahoma, through Omaha, 
                Nebraska, to Niobrara, Nebraska, which follows the 
                return route taken by Chief Standing Bear and the Ponca 
                people, as generally depicted on the map entitled 
                `Chief Standing Bear National Historic Trail 
                Feasibility Study', numbered 903/125,630, and dated 
                November 2014.
                    ``(B) Availability of map.--The map described in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be on file and available for 
                public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 
                Department of the Interior.
                    ``(C) Components.--The feasibility study conducted 
                pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall include a 
                determination on whether the Chief Standing Bear Trail 
                meets the criteria in subsection (b) for designation as 
                a national historic trail.''.
    (b) Timeline.--The feasibility study authorized by the amendment in 
subsection (a) shall be completed not later than 1 year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 12

- 00119

- CV

JULIO PEREZ, JR., Appellant

V.

EDWIN R. SEWELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12C1410

- 102

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant

, Julio Perez, Jr., has filed a motion to dismiss his pending appeal in this matter

pursuant to Rule 42.1(a) (1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a) (1) . The motion is signed by the appellant , who is representing himself.

We grant the appellan t’ s motion and dismiss the appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: April 16, 2013

Date Decided: April 17, 2013
### NU MBE R 1 3 - 0 8 - 0 0 1 5 4 - CR 

## C O U R T O F A P P E A LS T H I R T EEN T H D I ST R I C T O F T EXAS CO RPUS CHRI ST I-

EDI NBURG

_______________________________________________________ __ E D D I E G A R C I A , A pp e l l an t, v . T H E S T A T E O F T E XA S , A p p e lle e .

____________________________________________________________

O n A p p e a l from th e 3 1 9 th D istric t C o u rt of Nue ce s County , Te x as.

____________________________________________________________ MEMOR AN DU M OPI NI ON Be for e Just i ce s Rodri gue z, G arza, and V e l a M e m or andum O pi ni on Pe rCuri am A ppe l l an t , E ddi e G arci a, by an d t h r ou ghh i s at

tor n ey , h as fi l ed a m ot i onto di sm i ss h i s a p p e a l b e c a u s e h e n o l o n g e r d e s i re s to p r o s e c u t e i t. S eeT EX . R. A PP . P
. 4 2 .2 (a ). W i th o u t p a s s i n g o n th e me ri ts o f t h e c a s e , we g ra n t t h e mo ti o nto d i s mi s s p u rs u a n t to Tex as R u l es of

A ppel l ate P r

ocedu re 42. 2( a)an d D I S M I S S t h e appea l
. H avi n g di sm i ss ed

### 2

t h e appea l at

a p p e l l an t' s r

equ est , n o m ot i onf

or r eh eari n g w i l l be e n ter

tai n ed, an d ou r ma n d a te w i l l i s s u e fo rthw i th
. P e n d i n g mo ti o n s , i f a n y, a re d i s mi s s e d a s mo o t.
P E R C U R I A M
D o n o t p u b l i s h
. S eeT EX . R. A PP . P . 4 7 .2 (b ). M em or an du m O pi n i ondel i v

er ed an d f i l ed t h i s 1 2t hday

of Ju n e, 2008.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
C. Quinn, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:    May 8, 2006                                 /s/ Kevin C. Quinn
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Kevin C. Quinn
                                                     President
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2381    Filed: 06/04/19    Entered: 06/04/19 14:14:48    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2381    Filed: 06/04/19    Entered: 06/04/19 14:14:48    Page 2 of2
altut 

Cherry 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

CHET DUDA, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 69616 

FILED 

MAR 2 1 2016 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a 

motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; 

Valerie Adair, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the 

aforementioned decision, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 

349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

-;,#0,04 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

Chet Duda 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

(0) 1947A e
Order entered June 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01583-CV

EDWARD C. NEWBERRY, Appellant

V.

CLAUDIA J. NEWBERRY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 06-0752

ORDER

By letter dated December 28, 2012, we directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing 

our jurisdiction over the appeal as the notice of appeal appeared untimely. In response, appellant 

informed the Court that the parties had settled their differences and moved to abate the appeal to 

allow the trial court to effectuate the settlement agreement. We granted the motion and, by order 

entered January 10, 2013, abated the appeal. We stated in our order that the appeal would be

reinstated in forty-five days or when the Court received a motion to dismiss confirming the trial 

court had effectuated the parties’ agreement, whichever occurred first. The forty-five days have 

lapsed and no motion to dismiss has been filed. Accordingly, we REINSTATE the appeal. 

Because our abatement order suspended the time for appellant to file his jurisdictional letter 

brief, we reset the deadline and ORDER appellant to file the letter brief within ten days of the 
date of this order. Any response by appellee shall be filed within fifteen days of the date of this 

order. Appellant is cautioned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without 

further notice. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13706 Filed: 05/09/23 Entered: 05/09/23 10:10:06 Page 1

of 1
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 1of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 2of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 3of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 4of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 5of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 6of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 7of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 8of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 9of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 10of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 11of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 12of 13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-3    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 13of 13
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50454

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KEITH DAVID MARTIN-ZIEBER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-268-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Keith David Martin-Zieber has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Martin-Zieber has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50454 Document: 00513472999 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-50454

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-50454 Document: 00513472999 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
Exhibit
10.10 


 


DAVID
RECTOR


 


	1640 Terrace Way	Phone: (925) 930-0100
	Walnut Creek, CA 94597	e-mail: usendme1@pacbell.net


 





 






 


April 11, 2016


 


Mr. Jim Wemett, CEO/President


NaturalNano, Inc.


 


Dear Mr. Wemett:


 


Please be advised effectively
immediately that I resign my post as a Director of NaturalNano, Inc. This is not from any disagreement with management. Thank you.


 


David Rector
# National Hurricane Preparedness Week, 2010 

Each year during hurricane season, Americans living in our coastal and inland communities face the danger of these powerful storms. From high winds and storm surges to tornadoes and flooding, the hazards of hurricanes can destroy communities and devastate lives, and we must aggressively prepare our shores and protect our families.

During National Hurricane Preparedness Week, I urge individuals, families, communities, and businesses to take time to plan for the storm season before it begins. While hurricane forecasting has improved, storms may still develop with little warning. For Americans in hurricane-threatened areas, knowledge and preparation are pivotal to ensure emergency readiness and responsiveness. The National Hurricane Center at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, recommend taking several important steps to ensure safety. These precautions include: developing a family disaster plan; maintaining an emergency supply kit; securing homes, businesses, and belongings; and learning evacuation routes.

I urge those in hurricane-threatened areas to visit www.Hurricanes.gov/​Prepare to learn more about what they can do to protect themselves and their property from hurricanes. Emergency preparation resources for hurricanes and other natural disasters are also available at: www.Ready.gov.

To help Americans meet the challenges of severe weather, my Administration is focusing on preparedness and response—before, during, and after hurricanes. We are improving accountability and coordination between all levels of government, modernizing our emergency communications, and empowering more families to prepare themselves. Thanks to advancements in hurricane forecasting and tracking, the National Hurricane Center is working to give citizens more notice before impending storms. With the right planning and preparation, we can safeguard lives, protect property, and enhance America’s resilience to national weather emergencies.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 23 through May 29, 2010, as National Hurricane Preparedness Week. I call upon all Americans, especially those in hurricane-prone areas, to learn more about protecting themselves against hurricanes and to work together to respond to them.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. 2010-12753

Billing code 3195-W0-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant
to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PennantPark Investment Corporation (the Company) for the annual period
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur H. Penn, as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                         |  | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|                        |  | /s/    ARTHUR H.
PENN   |  | 
|Name:                   |  | Arthur H. Penn          |  | 
|Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|                        | 
|Date: November 18, 2009 |  |
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-1    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2659-1    Filed: 06/19/19    Entered: 06/19/19 16:44:24    Page 2of 2
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

November 16, 2017.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00871- CV

IN RE AMANDA LYNN SH AW , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 308th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-63844



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 2, 2017, relator Amanda Lynn Shaw filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 20 17 );
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the p etition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Michael Sydow, Jr., associate judge of the 308th District Court of Harris County
, to set aside his October 16, 2017 interim orde r s pending resumption of the emergency temporary orders hearing

.2

Effective September 1, 2017, the Texas Legislature expanded the courts of appeals’ mandamus jurisdiction to include associate judges by amending Section 22.221(b)(3) of the Texas Government Code

. 1 However, the amendment applies only to “a suit filed under Chapter 45, Title 1, Title 4, or Title 5, Family Code, on or
after the effective date of this Act. ” 2 The underlying suit was filed on September 21,
2016 , before the September 1, 2017 effective date of the amendment . Therefore, we have no jurisdiction over the associate judge in this mandamus proceeding. 3
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Brown.

1 See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b)(3) (providing that a court of appeals for a court of appeals district may issue a writ of mandamus against “an associate judge of a district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201, Family Code, in the court of appeals district for the judge

w ho appointed the associate judge”)

. 2 Act of June 15, 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., ch. 1013, § 2(b), 2017 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 4051.

3 See id. (“A suit filed under Chapter 45, Title 1, Title 4, or Title 5, Family Code, before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the suit was filed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.”
----

Exhibit 32 Section 1350 Certifications 

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of China Longyi Group International Holdings Limited. ThisCertification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of China LongyiGroup International Holdings Limited for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

The undersigned certify that such 10-KSB Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-KSB Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of China Longyi Group International Holdings Limited as ofDecember 31, 2007. 

This Certification is executed as of April 11, 2008 

By: /s/ Jie Chen ----------------------------------------- Name: Jie Chen Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) 

By: /s/ Xinmin Pan ----------------------------------------- Name: Xinmin Pan Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and AccountingOfficer) 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to China Longyi Group International HoldingsLimited and will be retained by China Longyi and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0518

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT CRAIG BRITZIUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 23, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 15 2022

11/15/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0518
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        12725682
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               3058131
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  103728991
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         4154661
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           4060421
<LOANS>                                      207404260
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3189012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               358871076
<DEPOSITS>                                   261380134
<SHORT-TERM>                                  46416250
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            5574978
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7279925
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               358871076
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                8634107
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              5563940
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              14198047
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4472605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6269305
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          7928742
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   176000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2961346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3111207
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2180207
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    3306000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    536000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  2682
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3189012
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   389000
<RECOVERIES>                                    253000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>