alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Granite State Provident Association, Appellant, v. Michael E. McHugh, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.—

Brown, P. J.:

This is an appeal from an order resettling a decree of foreclosure. McHugh had a mechanics’ lien upon the mortgaged premises, which attached after $10,500 had been, advanced on plaintiff’s mortgage. After the lien was filed, other advances were made on the mortgage up to $15,000. The court decided that McHugh’s lien and his costs must be paid after the plaintiff was paid $10,500 and his costs. By inadvertence he gave an allowance of $200 to the plaintiff, to be paid before McHugh’s lien and costs. The decree as resettled corrects this and makes the allowance payable after McHugh is paid. This is right. It was discretionary at all events with the trial court, and the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Dykman and Pratt, JJ., concurred
Project Category Exhibit

Total

Billed Hours

 Total Fees 

Requested 

Asset Management Services C1 2,264.4 794,291.00 $ 

Data Security Services C2 - - $ (1)

Legal Support Services C3 49,976.82 $ (2)

IT Software Services (Phase 1) C4 0.0 - $ 

Enterprise Project Management Tools Implementation Services C5 0.0 - $ 

Risk Assessment Services C6 0.0 - $ 

Retention Services C7 5.6 1,185.00 $ 

Fee Application Preparation Services C8 91.4 13,474.50 $ 

Total 2,361.4 858,927.32 $ 

(1) KPMG and the Debtors agreed to fixed-fee compensation for the Data Security Services. Payment of the fixed fee is dependent on an iterative process 

by which stages of the project go through a formal review, including a detailed walkthrough, modifications (if required) and formal acceptance. As of 

April 30, 2019, KPMG is not requesting any of the agreed upon fixed-fee amount for these services.

EXHIBIT B

PG&E Corporation and PG&E Company, et.al.

Case No. 19-30088

Summary of Hours and Discounted Fees Incurred by Category

April 1, 2019 through April 30, 2019

KPMG LLP Monthly Fee Statement Page 3 of 165

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2772-2 Filed: 06/27/19 Entered: 06/27/19 11:49:48 Page 1

of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Reorganized Debtors. 

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Liz Santodomingo, do declare and state as follows: 

1. I am employed by Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC (“Kroll”)1, the claims and 

noticing agent for the Reorganized Debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On October 5, 2022, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Kroll 

caused the following document to be served via first class mail on William B. Abrams at (1) 1519 

Branch Owl Place, Santa Rosa, CA 95409 and (2) 2041 Stagecoach Rd., Santa Rosa, CA 95404: 

 Order Denying Request for Telephone Conference re Discovery Dispute [Docket No. 13044] 

3. I have reviewed the Notices of Electronic Filing (NEF) for the above-listed document, 

and I understand that parties listed in each NEF as having received notice through electronic mail were 

electronically served with that document through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system. 

4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that the 

foregoing is true and correct and that if called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify 

thereto. 

1

 Effective March 29, 2022, Prime Clerk LLC changed its name to Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13066 Filed: 10/13/22 Entered: 10/13/22 11:41:10 Page 1

of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 SRF 64524 

Executed this 13th day of October 2022, at New York, NY. 

/s/ Liz Santodomingo

Liz Santodomingo

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13066 Filed: 10/13/22 Entered: 10/13/22 11:41:10 Page 2

of 2
#### Catherine Schoonmaker v. Leonard Blass

(No. 2).

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.

All concur.
**Exhibit 15.3**

Securities and Exchange Commission 

100 FStreet, N.E. 

Washington D.C. 20549 

June 25, 2010 

**Re: 3SBio Inc.**

Dear Sirs: 

We were previouslyprincipal accountants for 3SBio Inc. (“the Company”) and, under the date of April 21, 2009, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. On May 5, 2009, we were dismissed. 

We have readthe Company’s statements included under item 16F of its December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 20-F, and we agree with such statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with the Company’s statements that:“The audit committee of our board of directors approved both the engagement of Ernst & Young Hua Ming and the dismissal of KPMG” and “During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, and the subsequent interim periodthrough May 5, 2009, neither we nor anyone on our behalf consulted with Ernst & Young Hua Ming concerning (a) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of auditopinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements, and Ernst & Young Hua Ming concluded that neither any written report nor any oral advice was provided to us that was an important factor considered by us in reaching adecision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (b) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement with the former auditors or a reportable event.” 

Yours faithfully 

/s/ KPMG 

KPMG 

Hong Kong, China
EXHIBIT 32.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Balzarini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: August 10, 2009/s/ John E. BalzariniJohn E. BalzariniChief Financial Officer
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2841 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 17:41:35 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2841 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 17:41:35 Page 2 of

2
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**NORTHERN        STATES FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

|                                                                |            |                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------|
|                                                                |            |
|                                                           |       |                        |
| Date:                       August 7, 2006 | By:   | /s/                  Fred Abdula |

|   |   | Fred Abdula |
|--------|--------|-------------|

|   |   | Chairman of the Board ofDirectors                      and President |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                      |            |                                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                                      |            |
|                                                                 |       |                                   |
| Date:                             August 7, 2006 | By:   | /s/                        Thomas M. Nemeth |

|   |   | Thomas M.                        Nemeth |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|

|   |   | Vice President and                              Treasurer |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Infrastructure Materials Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: October 11, 2011








/s/ Todd D. Montgomery


Todd D. Montgomery


Chief Executive Officer


Infrastructure Materials Corp.











Dated: October 11, 2011








/s/ Rakesh Malhotra


Rakesh Malhotra


Chief Financial Officer


Infrastructure Materials Corp.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infrastructure Materials Corp. and will be retained by Infrastructure Materials Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LENIST KEY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2502

[ January 13, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Daniel Arthur Casey

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11002654CF10A

.

Lenist Key, Doral, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, C.J., L EVINE and K L INGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Dennis F. Dunne (admitted pro hac vice) 

Samuel A. Khalil (admitted pro hac vice) 

MILBANK LLP 

55 Hudson Yards 

New York, New York 10001-2163 

Telephone: (212) 530-5000 

Facsimile: (212) 530-5219 

and 

Gregory A. Bray (SBN 115367) 

Thomas R. Kreller (SBN 161922) 

MILBANK LLP 

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (424) 386-4000 

Facsimile: (213) 629-5063 

Counsel for the Official Committee 

of Unsecured Creditors

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered)

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION OF 

THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF 

UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR AN 

ORDER AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF 

AN OBJECTION UNDER SEAL 

[No Hearing Requested] 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2836 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 16:11:44 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on July 2, 2019, the Official Committee of 

Unsecured Creditors (the “Creditors’ Committee”) filed a motion (the “Motion”) pursuant to 

sections 105(a) and 107(b) of title 11 of the United States Code and Rule 9018 of the Federal Rules 

of Bankruptcy Procedure for entry of an order authorizing the Creditors’ Committee to file under 

seal its unredacted objection to the Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 363 and 105(a) and 

Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004 Authorizing Debtors to Purchase Directors and Officers Insurance [Docket 

No. 2471]. In support of the Motion, the Creditors’ Committee also filed the Declaration of 

Gregory A. Bray contemporaneously therewith. 

Dated: July 2, 2019 

 MILBANK LLP 

 /s/ Gregory A. Bray 

GREGORY A. BRAY 

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured 

Creditors

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2836 Filed: 07/02/19 Entered: 07/02/19 16:11:44 Page 2 of

2
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Mintak, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Dussault Apparel Inc.
      for the year ended October 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Dussault Apparel Inc.                                                                

|Dated: June 4, 2010 |                                           
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                    | /s/
      Robert Mintak                   
|                    | Robert Mintak                             
|                    | Chief Financial Officer                   
|                    | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
|                    | Accounting Officer)                       
|                    | Dussault Apparel Inc.                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dussault Apparel
Inc. and will be retained by Dussault Apparel Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                         
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                    OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                      DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                                 27,061
<SECURITIES>                                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          10,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            (640)
<INVENTORY>                                                             1,327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       40,643
<PP&E>                                                                  1,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         46,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  18,019
<BONDS>                                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                               49,924
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             24,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           46,614
<SALES>                                                                 5,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        9,633
<CGS>                                                                     678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           1,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        6,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         86
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         1,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              578
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     1,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                             .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             .12
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT B 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2996-2 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 20:34:08 Page 1

of 3
Exhibit B 

Budget and Staffing Plan 

Aggregate Budget for Matter Categories for the Period Beginning on January 29, 2019 and 

Ending on May 31, 2019 

Matter 

Number Project Category Description Hours Budgeted 

Total Compensation 

Budgeted1

Applicable to the Debtors 

020 Legislative Issues 505 $428,425.00 

021 

Non-Bankruptcy Litigation / Wildfire 

(Criminal) 8,270 $5,605,275.00 

022 Non-Working Travel 160 $164,125.00 

023 Purchase Power Agreements (including 

Adversary Proceedings) 215 $233,150.00 

025 Regulatory Issues 1,880 $1,504,875.00 

026 Retention / Billing / Fee Applications: MTO 245 $218,600.00

Total 11,275 $8,154,450.00 

 

1

 Budgeted numbers do not necessarily amount to a 1:1 ratio because they reflect a blended 

hourly rate and a variable allocation of timekeepers and hours, depending on the needs for each 

matter number. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2996-2 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 20:34:08 Page 2

of 3
Aggregate Staffing Plan Across All Matter Categories 

for the Period Beginning on January 29, 2019 and Ending on May 31, 2019 

Category of Timekeeper 

Number of Timekeepers 

Expected to Work on 

the Matter Categories 

During the Budget Period 

Average 

Hourly Rate2

Partner 18 $1,173 

Of Counsel 1 $890 

Associate 5 $722 

Jr. Associate 8 $550 

Staff Attorney 15 $424 

eDiscovery Attorney 1 $575 

Paralegal 8 $357 

ALS 3 $403 

Case Clerks 2 $110 

Total Attorney 48 $776 

Total Non-Attorney 13 $316 

Total 61 $723 

 

2

 The Average Hourly Rate is a weighted average based on the individual hourly rate of, 

and projected number of hours worked by, each timekeeper over the course of the budget period. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2996-2 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 20:34:08 Page 3

of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-14212

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NICHOLAS STEPHEN WOODYARD, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00039-BJD-PDB-2

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-14212 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-14212

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Shehnoor Grewal, appointed counsel for Nicholas Woodyard in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from 

further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review 

of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative 

merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination 

of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Woodyard’s conviction 

and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-14212 Date Filed: 06/13/2022 Page: 2 of 2
|                                                                                                                                                                             | SUNTEC Cleanroom & HVACEngineering Co., Ltd |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   LIST OF DRAWINGS   New Plant Project of Shenyang Sunshine Pharmaceutical Company LimitedProduction WorkshopDesign of Working DrawingsPipeline System  |
|                                                                                                                                                                        |

|          |       |        | Project No. | Q558                 | Total 6 Pages |
|---------------|------------|-------------|-------------|----------------------|---------------|
| Prepared by   | Checked by | Approved by | Drawing No. | D Wen - 558-1-PP-1/1 |
| E05-061305-80 |       |

----
### Renexablo

Peha D, Rfed, Ooml.alon.z,

.~

4he O-mny and the oentxoo4 be4w.o~ the aampr~‘

. reprosonto

### oonlrrsota

ore mb.4 the **npmeentet%rea~** 

### same **Ooagur~, bmm**  **by** ax400 **0t** 4h0 wOtttiOn **oa4erfn(l upOn**  **the ~dutio.**  **m, in**  $h? said **wn**

**Thi ~rriktlan**  **‘ 1141~**  **Co be**  4&~“cip.+i#&+mplo~. **:og ad&**  **auwexe& ~.a$&ier**  **cir.not** Ml.. **u&de .4ha**  

### oun4x.at **by** hi8 'OMpany.18',o~red by the **ON= #vlo**  

### 84 

### 0md0 88~004~-0u4 ia the'a~,tute& above. 

### l r eí: 4 h l a~

1 4 ~r e lii r

: t h a i 4hh .e l tit~tea 

### d o

Ii.4 : o x p r aaa l y lnol&d@'.the

iatk$ktLoa

‘or orrid. iirpirriiti iUi& u@ **core tanoblo**  

### to tlad.la4he 84ofutoa a neoea8ary

bpl+o~t&oa~?h would s iwludo au* 

### o~p~~t~io~.

~, : :_.
..

-oration for'4he ooxvlooa thud pertwd.~m boh*lf Of.hia 

### 00ap.n~from dopo.ita psid in **by.the** 

### xepreaento4ivea he hlroa **uh~gea in**  **any roapQQt**  relo4lre to ths 

### mo4ter~jhore~tiOrdiaouaalon his relationtip .40 hla'ooppony or hia ‘4a4- under

### the deflai4~oa;~~ &an In the 84a4u40. A Solu4ruotlea 

### of the emplo~at..aIps4 8~404u4e uhlah reul6 bdaibhla supor**tt8.x** 

### wl4hln**4h6 4exyna**  **et aueh**  **Hatu48 would**  **alao iP41tie**  oapoony whlgh h&OS 148 esployeea 4hreW 148 em tloa **x.** & U & Q

o x l gez ll r a Ed w d o

1~6 4 kliO W

t h a t t h i s r a 

### the~lntentlma? th* L@tiOtm.

~~~t~e~ioro~a~(1t~yadfl~d~t~~ Q+ % Q~o f

Ohlo d o p i r o a r nt

Me a t0 l 04f.w 

### La tho oopooity deger&kd in yew fo4t6z&Ii ,148 SnS~OSWSS would 

### not OCR *Lthf s 4 h 0 p~~+eaa

o f ee x l r9lown4 annoy low. m l 

### omx4uuu with yoke rowoat uo are ret- "OF" h r m r i 4h

4 h e r & l o w h t eh y o u l n o l e a ed

8n d w e4 n u 4 **lkha top,~%**  **‘ tlnd4he**  **ummr** here6l~nto~auinqairy, u4iafaetoxy.

.