alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.3
                                  CERTIFICATION

I,  John E. Balzarini, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify that:
    -----------------

1. I have  reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending
June 30, 2006 of First Chester County Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

October 2, 2006



/s/John E. Balzarini
--------------------------
John E. Balzarini
Chief Financial Officer



                                       16
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                 322
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                        3,330
<ALLOWANCES>                           377
<INVENTORY>                            681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     4,804
<PP&E>                               1,422
<DEPRECIATION>                         544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      19,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                6,447
<BONDS>                              1,466
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                               110
<OTHER-SE>                          11,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        19,606
<SALES>                              5,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     5,815
<CGS>                                  678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        3,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      1,503
<INCOME-TAX>                            91
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  1,412
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         1,412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       $ 0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                       $ 0.05
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)



The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Cadmus Communications Corporation, certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Cadmus Communications Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and
shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                                      |  |                                                  
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce V. Thomas                   |  | /s/ Paul K. Suijk                                
|Bruce V. Thomas                       |  | Paul K. Suijk                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                    
|November 9, 2004                      |  | November 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin C. Quinn, President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:     November 9, 2007

                                                              /s/ Kevin C. Quinn
                                                              ------------------
                                                              Kevin C. Quinn
                                                              President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,204,110
<SECURITIES>                                 6,429,431
<RECEIVABLES>                                  359,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,139,858
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,100,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,935,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,165,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,100,739
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               445,258
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  513,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (68,435)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (68,435)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (68,435)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,435)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Letter Agmt., dated 02/10/2009, by and between Irving Azoff and Ticketmaster



 Exhibit 10.6 
 February 10, 2009 
 Irving Azoff 
 c/o
Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. 
 8800 West Sunset Blvd. 
 West
Hollywood, CA 90069 
 Dear Irving: 
 This letter agreement sets
forth the understanding between you and Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. (“Ticketmaster”) in connection with the proposed merger (the “Merger”) between Ticketmaster and Live Nation, pursuant to the Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), among Ticketmaster, Live Nation and Merger Sub. You understand that the Board of Directors of Ticketmaster is entering into the Merger Agreement in reliance on your agreements contained herein.
Terms used in this letter without definition have the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement. 
 Under the terms of the Merger Agreement being entered into
on the date hereof, Ticketmaster shall redeem, prior to the completion of the Merger, the shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, of Ticketmaster (the “Ticketmaster Series A Preferred Stock”) that are held
by you or on your behalf at the time of redemption for a note (the “Note”), with the Note having terms comparable to the terms of the Ticketmaster Series A Preferred Stock (except that the Note would not be convertible into shares of
Ticketmaster Common Stock). The parties shall negotiate the terms of the Note in a good faith, reasonable manner to ensure that the legal, economic and tax treatment you shall be entitled to with respect to such Note are, in the aggregate, no less
favorable than such treatment with respect to the Ticketmaster Series A Preferred Stock. You will retain the two (2) million Ticketmaster Stock Options (each with a strike price of $20.00) to acquire shares of Ticketmaster Common Stock,
irrespective of other awards given to you in connection with the Merger or a new employment agreement entered into by you in connection with the Merger, which Ticketmaster Stock Options shall vest by their terms upon consummation of the Merger.

 By your signing the counterpart of this letter, you hereby indicate your agreement to the foregoing. 







 Sincerely, 
  

			
	TICKETMASTER ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Chris Riley
		 	 Name: Chris Riley
 Title: Senior Vice
President


 ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED: 
  

							
	Irving Azoff
				
	By:	 	 /s/Irving Azoff
	  	Date:	 	 2/10/09
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ROBERT JOINER, *

* No. 12

- 583 V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: August 1 , 2014

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys ’ Fe es and C osts; award

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * in the amount to which respondent

* does not object.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Diana Stadelnikas Sedar

, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, Sarasota, FL

, for

Petitioner;

Julia W. McInerny

, U nited States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC

, for

Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

On June 25, 2014, petitioner filed a stipulation of fact concerning final

attorneys’ fees and costs in the above

- captioned matter. Previously, petitioner

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent

for review. Upon review of petitioner’s app lication, respondent raised objections

to certain items. Based on subsequent discussions, petitioner amended h is

application to request $18,725.00 , an amount to which respondent does not object.

The Court awards this amount.

On September 10, 2012

, Rober t Joiner filed a petition for compensation

alleging that the seasonal influenza (“flu”) vaccine , which he received on October

1 T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical inf ormation or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.16, 2009, caused him to suffer Guillain

- Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) . Petitioner

received compensation based upon the parties’ stipulat ion. Decision , filed July 11,

2014 . Because petitioner received compensation, he is entitled to an award of

attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

Petitioner seeks a total of $18,725.00 in atto rneys’ fees and costs for his

counsel. Addi tionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states

that he did not incur any in out

- of

- pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this

claim. Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees

and costs.

After revi ewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $18,725.00 in the form of a check made payable to

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Diana Stadelnikas Sedar , for

attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. §

300aa

- 15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357

-

6353.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of REII, Inc., (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garfield Ricketts,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


May 6, 2004                /s/ Garfield Ricketts -- Chief Executive Officer
                            -------------------------
                            Garfield Ricketts
                            Chief Executive Officer

                          /s/ Una Ricketts -- Secretary/Treasurer
                              -------------------------
                              Una Ricketts
                              Secretary/Treasurer



<PAGE>
**ANNUAL
      STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**





**SACO
      I Trust 2006-12**





**2006**











The
      undersigned, an authorized officer of LaSalle Bank National Association
      (“LBNA”), hereby certifies as follows:





1. I
      have
      made, or caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the master
      servicing activities of LBNA during the preceding calendar year ending 2006,
      and
      its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated December 19, 2006
      (the “Agreement”) for SACO I Trust, Series 2006-12.





2.  To
      the
      best of my knowledge, based on such review, LBNA has, without exception,
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      throughout the preceding calendar year ending 2006.





In
      witness whereof, I the undersigned have executed this Annual Statement of
      Compliance on this 7 th day of
      March, 2007.








LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Master Servicer







By:
      /s/ Andrew Leszczynski




Name:
      Andrew Leszczynski


Title:
      First Vice President
Order filed June 24, 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00644

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF E.D.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 24757



### ORDER
App ellant’s brief filed on May 11, 2020, discloses the name of a person who was a minor when the underlying suit was filed

. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9(a ) (3)

. Accordingly, the brief is STRICKEN

. Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 on or before July 5 , 2021.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Exhibit 33.6.2

MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE

WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

March 6, 2008

SunTrust Bank
(the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i), 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the
CFR) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria), for securitization transactions serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. occurring after December 31, 2005 (the Platform). The Asserting Party is not assessing compliance
with any other criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the CFR.

The Asserting Party used the applicable criteria in paragraph
(d) of Title 17, Section 229.1122 of the CFR to assess compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party
has concluded that it has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2007 (the Reporting Period).

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

SUNTRUST BANK

Solely with respect to Sections 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii)



|       |  |                       
|------ |  | ----------------------
|By:    |  | /S/ Rosealma T. Burton
|Name:  |  | Rosealma T. Burton    
|Title: |  | First Vice President  

SUNTRUST BANK

Solely
with respect to Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i)



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /S/ Tomas E. Suarez 
|Name:  |  | Tomas E. Suarez     
|Title: |  | Group Vice President
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4993 

To clarify the effect of State statutes of repose on the required commencement 

date for actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2014 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To clarify the effect of State statutes of repose on the 

required commencement date for actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Act of 1980. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4993 IH

1 SECTION 1. ACTIONS UNDER STATE LAW FOR DAMAGES 

2 FROM EXPOSURE TO HAZARDOUS SUB3 STANCES. 

4 Section 309 of the Comprehensive Environmental Re5 sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 

6 U.S.C. 9658) is amended— 

7 (1) in the subsection heading of subsection (a), 

8 by inserting ‘‘AND REPOSE’’ after ‘‘STATUTES OF

9 LIMITATIONS’’; and 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘or repose’’ after ‘‘limitations’’ 

11 each of the other places it appears. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
DENY; and Opinion Filed June 25, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00762-CV

IN RE GERARDO NAJERA, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F93-42373-V

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Relator files this petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the trial 

court to rule on his motion to compel the court reporter to provide him with the price for the 

purchase of his transcript from his November 1997 criminal trial in the 292nd District Court. 

The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we do not recount them here. No litigant is 

entitled to a hearing at whatever time he may choose. In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228-29 

(Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). A trial court has a reasonable time within which 

to consider a motion and to rule. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). 

There is no bright line standard for determining whether a reasonable time to rule has 

elapsed. In re Bates, 65 S.W.3d 133, 133 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). The 

circumstances of the case dictate whether the trial court has ruled within a reasonable time. 

Barnes, 832 S.W.2d at 426. Many factors determine whether a trial court has ruled within a 
–2–

reasonable time. Among these are “the trial court's actual knowledge of the motion, whether its 

refusal to act is overt, the state of the court's docket, and the existence of other judicial and 

administrative matters which must be addressed first.” Chavez, 62 S.W.3d at 228. The trial 

court’s inherent power to control its own docket must also be given due consideration, Chavez, 

62 S.W.3d at 228. Thus, a reviewing appellate court may not arbitrarily interfere with the trial 

court’s power to control its docket, but may only order the trial court to rule if the circumstances 

show that the trial court’s failure to act is an abuse of its discretion. See In re First Mercury Ins. 

Co., No. 13-13-00469-CV, 2013 WL 6056665, at *6 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Nov. 13, 2013, 

orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); Bates, 65 S.W.3d at 135. We conclude relator has failed to 

establish that in the circumstances of this case the trial court’s failure to rule on his motion is an 

abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

140762F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 1

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 2

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 3

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 4

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 5

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 6

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 7

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 8

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 9

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 10

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 11

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 12

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 13

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 14

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 15

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 16

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 17

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 18

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 19

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 20

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 21

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 22

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 23

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 24

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 25

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 26

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 27

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 28

of 29
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2321-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 15:13:24 Page 29

of 29