TOGUT, SEGAL & SEGAL LLP

One Penn Plaza, Suite 3335

New York, NY 10119

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2076-1 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:53:49 Page 1

of 4
Retentions of Compass and FTI by Different Parties in the Same Case1

No. Case Compass Retention FTI Retention Nature of Potentially Adverse Representation

Objections to 

Compass or 

FTI 

Retentions

1 Lehman Brothers 

Holdings Inc., et al.

08-13555 (JMP)

Bankr. S.D.N.Y.

Petition Date: 9/15/08 

Expert to Debtors

Post-Confirmation

Financial Advisor to 

Official Committee 

of Unsecured 

Creditors

Interim: 11/5/08, 

Docket No. 1405

Final: 11/21/08, 

Docket No. 1655

Compass and FTI testified on opposite sides in 

several litigation matters. Compass served as an 

expert on behalf of the Debtors and FTI served 

as the Financial Advisor to the Official 

Committee of Unsecured Creditors. 

None.

2 FairPoint 

Communications, Inc. v. 

Verizon 

Communications, Inc. et 

al2

3:11-cv-00597-MOC-DCK 

(W.D.N.C.)

Removal Date: 11/23/11

Expert to Verizon 

Communications Inc.

Expert to Mark 

Holiday, the 

Litigation Trustee

Compass and FTI testified on opposite sides in 

connection with a fraudulent transfer action by 

the Litigation Trustee against Verizon 

Communications, Inc. and other defendants. 

Compass served as an expert on behalf of 

Verizon Communications, Inc. and FTI served 

as an expert on behalf of the Litigation Trustee. 

N/A

 1 This chart contains illustrative examples of retentions of both Compass and FTI providing services to potentially adverse parties within 

the same case.

2 This case was originally captioned as The FairPoint Communications, Inc. ET AL. Litigation Trust v. Verizon Communications, Inc., NYNEX 

Corporation, Verizon New England, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and Verizon Wireless of the East LP, pending in the General 

Court of Justice, Superior Court Division in the State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, under case number 11 CVS 19689, assigned 

to the North Carolina Business Court (the “Action”). The Action was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District 

of North Carolina. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2076-1 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:53:49 Page 2

of 4
No. Case Compass Retention FTI Retention Nature of Potentially Adverse Representation

Objections to 

Compass or 

FTI 

Retentions

3 Millicom International 

Cellular Group and 

Sentel GSM v. Senegal 

ICSID Arbitration

Expert to Millicom 

International 

Cellular S.A. and 

Sentel GSM S.A.

Expert to the 

Republic of Senegal 

Millicom commenced an arbitration proceeding 

against Senegal alleging that Senegal 

expropriated a wireless telecommunication 

investor. Compass served as an expert on 

behalf of Millicom and FTI served as an expert 

on behalf of the Republic of Senegal. 

N/A 

4 Les Laboratoires Servier 

S.A.S. Biofarma S.A.S. 

and Artists et Techniques 

du Progres v. the 

Republic of Poland 

UNCITRAL Arbitration

Expert to the 

Government of 

Poland

Expert to Les 

Laboratoires Servier 

S.A.S.

Les Laboratoires Servier S.A.S. commenced an 

arbitration proceeding against Poland alleging 

that Poland expropriated a pharmaceutical 

investment. Compass served as an expert on 

behalf of Poland, and FTI served as an expert on 

behalf of Les Laboratoires Servier S.A.S.

N/A

5 Abu Dhabi Investment 

Authority v. Citigroup 

Inc. 

ICDR

Expert to Citigroup 

Inc.

Expert to Abu 

Dhabi Investment 

Authority (“Adia”)

Adia, the Abu Dhabi investment authority, sued 

Citigroup, regarding whether Citigroup misled 

Adia in connection with Adia’s investment in a 

convertible preferred stock. Compass provided 

expert testimony on behalf of Citigroup, and FTI 

provided expert testimony on behalf of Adia. 

N/A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2076-1 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:53:49 Page 3

of 4
No. Case Compass Retention FTI Retention Nature of Potentially Adverse Representation

Objections to 

Compass or 

FTI 

Retentions

6 Buccaneer Energy (USA) 

Inc. v. Gunnison Energy 

Corporation, SG 

Interests, I, Ltd., and SG 

Interests VII, Ltd

1:12-cv-01618-RPM 

D. Colo.

Complaint Filing Date: 

6/21/12

Expert to Gunnison 

Energy Corporation

Expert to SG 

Interest I., Ltd., SG 

Interests VII, Ltd. 

(partnerships and 

defendants), and 

affiliates

Buccaneer Energy (USA) Inc. filed an action 

against Gunnison Energy Corporation, and 

other defendants, alleging that defendants’ 

activities in restraining the production, 

gathering, processing, transportation, and sale 

of natural gas from various Colorado counties 

violated various laws including the Sherman 

Antitrust Act, and Colorado common law. 

Compass and FTI both provided expert 

testimony on behalf of their clients on related 

but opposing issues. 

N/A

7 In re: Lightsquared Inc., 

et al.

12-12080 (SCC) 

Bankr. S.D.N.Y.

Petition Date: 5/14/12

Expert to Debtors Expert to creditor, 

Solus LP and Solus 

Alternative Asset 

Management LP

FTI served as an expert for Solus LP and Solus 

Alternative Asset Management LP, creditors of 

the Debtors, while Compass served as an expert 

on behalf of the Debtors in connection with 

valuation issues. 

N/A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2076-1 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:53:49 Page 4

of 4