alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID MILLER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3771

[September 6, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Anne 

Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 76-004041CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. 

Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rogers v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1493 (Fla. 4th DCA 

July 5, 2017); Rooks v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1573 (Fla. 3d DCA July 

12, 2017); Currie v. State, 219 So. 3d 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Gregory A. Wells, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To
the best of my knowledge and belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003, by NTS-Properties V, a Maryland
Limited Partnership (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of NTS-Properties V, a Maryland Limited Partnership.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NTS-Properties V, a Maryland Limited Partnership and will be retained by NTS-Properties V,
a Maryland Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

/s/ Gregory A. Wells
Chief Financial Officer of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates V,
General Partner of NTS-Properties V, a Maryland Limited Partnership
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28649-28650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW175940]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease, 
Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement from Fossil Energy, Inc. for competitive oil 
and gas lease WYW175940 for land in Natrona County, Wyoming. The 
petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due 
since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. 
Weaver, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-
6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre, or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 
188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW175940 effective 
December 1, 2009, under the original terms and

[[Page 28650]]

conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates 
cited above. The BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.

Julie L. Weaver,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 2010-12246 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
Certifications

I, Susan Mills, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
       required to  be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
       on Form 10-K/A of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-HE3 (the "Exchange
       Act periodic reports");

2.     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
       whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
       to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in
       light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
       misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
       information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
       covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
       reports;

4.     Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in
       this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
       in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
       obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
       for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
       assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
       securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
       Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
       have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
       disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
       described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
       10-K/A.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association and New Century Mortgage Corporation.

Date: June 13, 2008


/s/ Susan Mills
---------------------------------
Susan Mills
Vice President
(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-4247

_____________________________

THOMAS MARTIN PARKER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Stephen A. Pitre, Judge.

September 16, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Thomas Martin Parker, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2257-1 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 17:17:42 Page 1

of 4
1. Clean Power SF (a division of the City and County of San Francisco) 

2. City of San Jose 

3. East Bay Community Energy Authority 

County of Alameda 

Albany 

Berkeley 

Dublin 

Emeryville 

Fremont 

Hayward 

Livermore 

Oakland 

Piedmont 

San Leandro 

Union City 

4. Marin Clean Energy 

County of Marin 

County of Napa 

County of Contra Costa 

Benicia 

Concord 

Danville 

El Cerrito 

Lafayette 

Martinez 

Moraga 

Oakley 

Pinole 

Pittsburg 

Richmond 

San Pablo 

San Ramon 

Walnut Creek 

5. Monterey Bay Community Power 

County of Santa Cruz 

City of Santa Cruz 

City of Watsonville 

City of Capitola 

City of Scotts Valley 

County of Monterey 

City of Salinas 

City of Monterey 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2257-1 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 17:17:42 Page 2

of 4
City of Pacific Grove 

City of Carmel 

City of Seaside 

City of Marina 

Sand City 

Soledad 

Greenfield 

Gonzalez 

County of San Benito 

City of Hollister 

City of San Juan Bautista 

6. Peninsula Clean Energy 

County of San Mateo 

Atherton 

Belmont 

Brisbane 

Burlingame 

Colma 

Daly City 

East Palo Alto 

Foster City 

Half Moon Bay 

Hillsborough 

Menlo Park 

Millbrae 

Pacifica 

Portola Valley 

Redwood City 

San Bruno 

San Carlos 

San Mateo 

South San Francisco 

Woodside 

7. Pioneer Community Energy 

County of Placer 

Auburn 

Colfax 

Loomis 

Lincoln 

Rocklin 

8. Redwood Coast Energy Authority 

County of Humboldt 

Arcata 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2257-1 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 17:17:42 Page 3

of 4
Blue Lake 

Eureka 

Ferndale 

Fortuna 

Rio Dell 

Trinidad 

Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District 

9. Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority 

Campbell 

Cupertino 

Gilroy 

Los Altos 

Los Altos Hills 

Los Gatos 

Milpitas 

Monte Sereno 

Morgan Hill 

Mountain View 

Saratoga 

Sunnyvale 

County of Santa Clara 

10. Sonoma Clean Power Authority 

Cloverdale 

Cotati 

Fort Bragg 

Petaluma 

Point Arena 

Rohnert Park 

Santa Rosa 

Sebastopol 

Sonoma 

County of Sonoma 

County of Mendocino 

Willits 

Windsor 

11. Valley Clean Energy Alliance 

Davis 

Woodland 

County of Yolo 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2257-1 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 17:17:42 Page 4

of 4
NO. 07-04-0295-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 27, 2004

______________________________ EX PARTE ALBERTO PACHEC O

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION Appellant

Alberto Pacheco has filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus with the clerk of this court, although the caption of the petition references the Co urt of Criminal Appeals. In t he petition, appellant seeks relief from his alleg edly illegal restraint in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division, pursuant to his conviction and sentence in cause number 42881-B in the 181 st District Court of Potter Co unty. Under article 11.07 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive authority to release from confinement persons who hav e be en finally convicted of nonca pital fel onies. SeeT E X . C RIM . P ROC . C ODE A NN . art.11.07 (West Supp.2004) (post-conviction ha beas corpus procedur

e in non capital cases); Hoang v. State , 872 S.W. 2d 694, 6 97 (Tex. Crim.App .1993).-2-

We dismiss for want of jurisdi ction. See Wat son v. State , 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex.App --Amarill o 2002, p et. ref'd)
.

Phil Johnson Chief Justice
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7060** 

DONNELL HURT , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. RICHARD TRODDEN, Commonwealth Attorney for Arlington County; WILLIAM WETZONIS, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney for Arlingto n County; ARLINGTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; HARRY DENNIS, Attorney at Law and an agent of the Commonwealth of Virginia , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Lia m O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00625

- LO

- JFA )

Submitted : December 15, 2011 Decided: December 30, 2011

Before AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Donnell Hurt, App ellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Donnell Hurt appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Acc ordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v.
Trodden , No. 1:11

- cv - 00625

- LO

- JFA (E.D. Va. July 13, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 1 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 2 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 3 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 4 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 5 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 6 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 7 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 8 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 9 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1710 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:11:07 Page 10

of 10
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  November 13, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long



Senior Vice President of Oxford Residential Properties I Corporation, equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7718

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERVIN JAHUE BLEVINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-90-63, CA-95-710-R)

Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: June 22, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ervin Jahue Blevins, Appellant Pro Se. Jennie M. Waering, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Blevins, Nos. CR-90-63; CA95-710-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.2





AMENDMENT
TO THE
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
THIS AMENDMENT to the Piedmont Natural Gas Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated effective November 1, 2014) (the “Plan”) is adopted by Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. (the “Piedmont”) as of 26 day of April, 2016.  


WHEREAS, Piedmont has adopted and maintains the Plan as a qualified “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for the benefit of its eligible employees;


WHEREAS, Piedmont reserved the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time; and


WHEREAS, Piedmont desires to amend the Plan to add provisions related to the pending merger of Piedmont with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Duke Energy Corporation.


NOW THEREFORE, the following new Article VII is added to the Plan immediately following Article VI of the Plan and the existing Articles VII through IX of the Plan are correspondingly renumbered as Articles VIII through X.


“ARTICLE VII
SUSPENSION OR SUSPENSION OF THE PLAN


7.01    Pending Merger.  Piedmont is party to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 24, 2015 with Duke Energy Corporation and Forest Subsidiary Inc. (the “Merger Agreement”).  The Merger Agreement provides that the Plan shall be terminated as of or prior to the effective time of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Effective Time”).  The provisions of this Article VII are adopted to allow the Plan to be administered in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement. 


7.02    Suspension of Plan.  The Benefit Plan Committee is authorized to (a) shorten any Payroll Deduction Period in progress under the Plan, (b) suspend Participant contributions to the Plan, (c) suspend further purchases of Stock under the Plan and (d) establish additional Stock Purchase Dates under the Plan, in each case, at such time or times (if any) prior to the Effective Time and for such period prior to the Effective Time as the Benefit Plan Committee deems necessary or appropriate, provided such action by the Benefit Plan Committee is consistent with the terms of the Merger Agreement


7.03    Termination of Plan.  The Plan shall terminate as of the Effective Time or at such time prior to the Effective Time as the Benefit Plan Committee shall specify provided such action by the Benefit Plan Committee is consistent with the terms of the Merger Agreement 











7.04    Termination of Article VII.  In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated prior the Effective Time for any reason, the terms and provisions of this Article VII shall have no further legal force or effect.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the day and year first above written.


PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.    


By: /s/ Kevin M. O’Hara
Kevin M. O’Hara
Senior Vice President—Chief Administrative Officer
- February 10, 1975

The Honorable Preston Stevens County Attorney Wheeler County P.O. Box 571 Shamrock, Texas 79079 Opinion No. H- 520 Re: County participation in construction of **a** privateiy operated livestock show **barn.** Dear **Mr.** Stevens:

You have requested our opinion regarding whether the Commissioners Court of Wheeler County may contribute $50,000.00 toward the construction ofa livestock show barn. which facility would be owned and operated by the Wheeler County Livestock Association, a private‘non-profit organization. Article 2372d-2, VIT.C.S., authorizes:

[the Commissioners Court ofany county . . . to purchase, build, **or** construct buildings and other permanent improvements to be used for annual exhibits ofhorticultural and agricultural products, and/or livestock and mineral products ofthe county. . . Payment must be made 

### from the constitutional permanent improvement fund. Although this statute does not itself prohibit a county’s participation in the construction offacilities inwhich the title thereto is vested elsewhere, article 3, section 52 ofthe Texas Constitution contains an affirmative proscription: Except as otherwise provided by this section,

the Legislature shall have nopower toauthorize

p. 2346,

The Honorable Preston Stevens page 2 (H-520)

any county, city, town or other political corporation or subdivision ofthe State tolend its credit ,ortogrant ptilic money or thing ofvalue inaid of, or to any individual, association or corporation whatsoever, or to become a stockholder in such corporation, association or company. There is noquestion that the Wheeler County Livestock Association is an “association or corporation” within the meaning ofarticle 3, section 52.

Under the provisions ofarticle 2372d-3, V. T. C.S., a county may:

. . . enter into contracts with persons, firms, or corporations for complete management of, the conducting, maintenance, use, and operation of such exhibits, buildings and improvements tinsuch terms as may be agreeable tothe Court, and shall have the authority to lease such exhibits, buildings and improvements on such terms as may be agreeable tothe Court, and shall have the authority to lease such exhibits, buildings and improvements under such terms and agreements as may be satisfactory tothe Commissioners Court and the lessee. The Commissioners Court thus may permit the Wheeler County Livestock Association for adequate consideration to lease and operate acounty facility. Sees. Attorney General Opinions H-472 (1974), H-403 (1973). Although thccounty may not contribute tothe erection ofa show barn by aprivate corporation, it may be possible for the county to contract with the private corporation concerning premises owned by the county for the purposes set outinthe statute. SUMMARY A county may not contribute public funds to the construction ofafacility tobe owned and operated byaprivate corporation. Very truly yours,

p. 234 Attorney General of TexasTheHonorable Preston Stevens page 3 (H-520)

APPROVED:

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Asdistant

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 2348