alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2163

To provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a water exchange

in lieu of electrification of the Chandler Pumping Plant at Prosser

Diversion Dam, Washington.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. GORTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To provide for a study of the engineering feasibility of a

water exchange in lieu of electrification of the Chandler

Pumping Plant at Prosser Diversion Dam, Washington.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHANDLER PUMPING PLANT AND POWER4 PLANT OPERATIONS AT PROSSER DIVERSION

5 DAM, WASHINGTON.

6 Section 1208 of Public Law 103–434 (108 Stat.

7 4562) is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a)—
2

•S 2163 IS

1 (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting

2 ‘‘OR WATER EXCHANGE’’ after ‘‘ELECTRIFICA3 TION’’;

4 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2),

5 and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), re6 spectively, and indenting appropriately;

7 (C) by striking ‘‘In order to’’ and inserting

8 the following:

9 ‘‘(1) ELECTRIFICATION.—In order to’’; and

10 (D) by adding at the end the following:

11 ‘‘(2) WATER EXCHANGE ALTERNATIVE.—

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—As an alternative to

13 the measures authorized under paragraph (1),

14 the Secretary may use sums appropriated under

15 paragraph (1) to study the engineering feasi16 bility of exchanging water from the Columbia

17 River for water historically diverted from the

18 Yakima River.

19 ‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out

20 subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in cooperation

21 with the Kennewick Irrigation District, shall—

22 ‘‘(i) prepare a report that describes

23 project benefits, contains feasibility level

24 designs and cost estimates, and secures the
3

•S 2163 IS

1 critical right-of-way areas for the pipeline

2 alignment;

3 ‘‘(ii) prepare an environmental assess4 ment; and

5 ‘‘(iii) conduct such other studies or in6 vestigations as are necessary to develop a

7 water exchange.’’;

8 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘or water

9 exchange’’ after ‘‘electrification’’; and

10 (3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘electrifica11 tion,’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘elec12 trification or water exchange’’.

Æ
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Preventive Medicine Unit Hosts Outbreak Investigation Workshop during CP-17
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Preventive Medicine Unit Hosts Outbreak Investigation Workshop during CP-17</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By Navy Public Affairs Support Element East</b> <span class="date">/ Published Feb. 14, 2017</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>PUERTO BARRIOS, Guatemala—Sailors from Navy Environmental and Preventive Medicine Unit (NEPMU) 2 hosted an outbreak investigation workshop, Feb. 8, as part of Continuing Promise 2017’s (CP-17) valuable training for partner nation community health workers who may be called to participate in investigations of infectious disease outbreaks.</p>
<p>The workshop is one of several public health knowledge exchanges hosted by NEPMU-2 Sailors currently deployed in support of CP-17, a three-month, civil-military operation conducting humanitarian assistance, knowledge exchange and training engagements, and medical, dental and veterinary support in Central and South America. </p>
<p>“The recent Zika virus pandemic in Central and South America highlights the critical roles surveillance and outbreak investigations play in protecting the health of the public,” said Lt. Cmdr. Lucas Johnson, officer in charge of CP-17’s preventive medicine detachment. </p>
<p>The one-day workshop was attended by 36 health professionals from Puerto Barrios, Guatemala, and surrounding rural communities. Course content included a review of common types of infectious disease outbreaks, preparation and execution outbreak investigations, establishing community disease surveillance programs, and principles of health risk communication.</p>
<p>The course culminated in a simulated outbreak investigation where participants translated their enhanced knowledge into best practices for maximizing the effectiveness and efficiency of conducting outbreak investigations in limited resource settings.</p>
<p>“This workshop and activities like it are discrete opportunities to fundamentally strengthen the healthcare capacity of partner nations,” said Johnson. “Participants from today’s workshop are not only prepared to independently conduct an outbreak investigation themselves; they’re prepared to teach other community health professionals their new skill set.” </p><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Ernest A. Bates, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Shared Hospital Services;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; andb) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;] andc) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (or the fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.November 14, 2007       /s/ Ernest A. Bates, M.D.          Ernest A. Bates, M.D.         Chief Executive Officer  
17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1648 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 12:51:35 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1648 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 12:51:35 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1648 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 12:51:35 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1648 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 12:51:35 Page 4 of

4
Exhibit (10)H

                               FNB CORPORATION

            SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' ANNUAL COMPENSATION

                  Effective May 12, 2004 through May 10, 2005


                            Non-Qualified
                            Stock Option     Unrestricted    Total
              Cash          Award            Stock Award     Consideration
             (Monthly)     (Annually)       (Annually)      (Annually)
Director      $1,000         $6,000           $6,000          $24,000
Chairman      $1,500         $6,000           $6,000          $30,000


Non-employee directors of FNB Corporation receive monthly cash compensation
of $1,000.  The Chairman of the Board of Directors receives additional
monthly cash compensation of $500, for total cash compensation of $1,500 per
month.  All Directors, including the Chairman, receive an annual award of
$6,000 in non-qualified stock options and $6,000 in unrestricted common
stock.

On May 12, 2004, pursuant to Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of Article 9 of the FNB
Corporation 2000 Incentive Stock Plan, each non-employee director was granted
non-qualified stock options to purchase 1,200 shares of FNB Corporation
common stock at $25.60 per share, the fair market value on the date of grant.
Each non-employee director was also granted 235 shares of unrestricted FNB
Corporation common stock.  The stock options vest in equal increments over
four years on the first, second, third, and fourth anniversary of the award
date, or earlier if the director leaves the board by reason of retirement,
death, disability, or change in control.  The stock options expire on May 12,
2014.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CADMUS
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION'S MARCH 31, 1998 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,462
<INVENTORY>                                     23,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,731
<PP&E>                                         234,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,164
<BONDS>                                         82,420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,933
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,530
<SALES>                                        289,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,644
<CGS>                                          223,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  269,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,053
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
        


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2427

To suspend temporarily the duty on Undecylenic acid.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 13, 2000

Mr. THOMPSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Undecylenic acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UNDECYLENIC ACID.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.01 Undecylenic acid

(CAS No. 112–

38–9) (provided

for in subheading

2916.19.30) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or
2

•S 2427 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  171,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,611
<INVENTORY>                                     90,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               329,006
<PP&E>                                         622,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 252,867
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 969,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,589
<OTHER-SE>                                     258,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   969,682
<SALES>                                        589,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               589,288
<CGS>                                          509,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  533,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,082
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,366
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,366
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-4554

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-4555

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALLEYNE REED WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-4556

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
2

versus

JAMES EDWARD GREENHOW, a/k/a James Neal, a/k/a

Candyman,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-4557

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEVI HAWKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-4561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.
3

No. 97-4562

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALLEYNE REED WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-4563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES EDWARD GREENHOW, a/k/a James Neal, a/k/a

Candyman,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-4564

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,
4

versus

ORRIE GAINES HOLMES, a/k/a Chopper,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-4565

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEVI HAWKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,

District Judge. (CR-95-44, CR-95-39)

Submitted: June 2, 1998 Decided: July 24, 1998

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Noland Grinnalds, Hampton, Virginia; Richard Chisolm Kerns,

Newport News, Virginia; Wesley Lee Pendergrass, Hampton, Virginia;

Richard S. Yarrow, Hampton, Virginia; Robert Bruce Jones, Newport

News, Virginia, for Appellants. Helen F. Fahey, United States

Attorney, Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney,

Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
5

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants were convicted of various charges stemming from

their respective roles in a conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine

and marijuana. See 21 U.S.C. § 2 (1994); 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

846 (1994). In addition, several Appellants were convicted of

firearms charges related to the drug conspiracy. See 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 922(g)(1) (West Supp. 1998); 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1) (West Supp.

1998). For his role as the leader of the conspiracy, Marty Lorenzo

Wright also was convicted of conducting a continuing criminal

enterprise (CCE). See 21 U.S.C. § 848(a) & (c) (1994). Finding no

merit to any of Appellants’ assignments of error, we affirm their

convictions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

t0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148608

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148608

COA: 318095

Monroe CC: 12-040016-FH

SHARON RUTH BROADWAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4976 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission to minimize infringement on the exercise and enjoyment 

of property rights in issuing hydropower licenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2014 

Mr. HURT (for himself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mrs. HARTZLER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission to minimize infringement 

on the exercise and enjoyment of property rights in 

issuing hydropower licenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Home 

5 Owner Rights Enforcement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HYDROPOWER LICENSES. 

7 (a) Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 797(e)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4976 IH

1 (1) by designating the first, second, and third 

2 sentences as paragraphs (1) through (3) respec3 tively; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (3) (as so designated)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘recreational 

6 opportunities,’’; and 

7 (B) by inserting ‘‘, and minimizing in8 fringement on the useful exercise and enjoy9 ment of property rights held by nonlicensees’’ 

10 after ‘‘aspects of environmental quality’’. 

11 (b) Section 10 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

12 803) is amended— 

13 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘, includ14 ing minimizing infringement on the useful exercise 

15 and enjoyment of property rights held by non16 licensees’’ after ‘‘section 4(e)’’; and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(k) PRIVATE LANDOWNERSHIP.—In developing any 

19 recreational resource within the project boundary, the li20 censee shall consider private landownership as a means to 

21 encourage and facilitate— 

22 ‘‘(1) private investment; and 

23 ‘‘(2) increased tourism and recreational use.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.4
   RegistrationStatementNumber
    
    Form
    
    Description333-05257
    
    Form S-8
    
    1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Agreement
entered into, effective January 4, 1995, by and between Sunrise Assisted Living, Inc, and David W.
Faeder333-38430
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan, as Amended333-26837
    
    Form S-8
    
    1997 Stock Option Plan333-57291
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, as Amended333-57293
    
    Form S-8
    
    1998 Stock Option Plan333-78313
    
    Form S-8
    
    1999 Stock Option Plan333-38432
    
    Form S-8
    
    2000 Stock Option Plan333-61918
    
    Form S-8
    
    2001 Stock Option Plan333-88570
    
    Form S-8
    
    2002 Stock Option Plan and Restricted Stock Plan333-61914
    
    Form S-8
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan333-109228
    
    Form S-8
    
    2003 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan333-120738
    
    Form S-8
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan