alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AGREEMENT is made on May 30, 2009. 
 BETWEEN: 
 DALEA PARTNERS, LP., 
 as Lender 
 AND: 
 TRANSATLANTIC PETROLEUM CORP., 
 as
Borrower 
 WHEREAS: 
  

	A.	The parties hereto entered into a credit agreement made as of November 28, 2008 (the “Credit Agreement”) wherein the Lender agreed to establish the Loan in
favor of the Borrower; 

  

	B.	The parties hereto entered into a First Amendment to Credit Agreement effective January 21, 2009; 

  

	C.	The parties hereto entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement effective February 4, 2009; 

  

	D.	The parties hereto entered into a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement effective February 11, 2009; 

  

	E.	The parties hereto entered into a Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement effective April 1, 2009; 

  

	F.	The parties hereto have agreed to further amend the Credit Agreement, as herein set out. 

 NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration (the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged), the parties hereto agree as follows: 

 

	1.	Unless otherwise defined herein or unless the context otherwise requires, defined words and terms used in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meanings when used herein.


  

	2.	The Credit Agreement shall be and is hereby modified as follows: 

  

	 	(a)	Paragraph 1(g) (“Commitment Termination Date”) shall be amended by replacing May 30, 2009” with “June 30, 2009”; 

  

	3.	The Credit Agreement, together with all terms, covenants and conditions thereof as hereby supplemented and amended, will be and continue to be in full force and effect.










	4.	This agreement and everything herein contained will enure to the benefit of and be binding on the Borrower and the Lender and their respective successors and assigns.


  

	5.	This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and
the same instrument, and it shall not be necessary in making proof of this agreement to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. Delivery of an executed signature page of this agreement by facsimile transmission or by e-mail in pdf
format shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof. 

  

	6.	The amendment to the Credit Agreement set forth herein shall be and be deemed to be effective as of and from May 30, 2009. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement on May 30, 2009. 
  

									
	The Borrower:	 		 	The Lender:
			
	TRANSATLANTIC PETROLEUM CORP.	 		 	DALEA PARTNERS, LP.
					
	Per:	 	 /s/ Jeffrey S. Mecom
	 		 	Per:	 	 /s/ Matthew McCann

		 	Authorized Signatory	 		 		 	Authorized Signatory

  

 - 2 -
Signed and Filed: April 29, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

April 29, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1755 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 18:07:07 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1755 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 18:07:07 Page 2 of

2
EXHIBIT
32
  CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, David
M. Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:  October
      6, 2009
                            By:
                            /s/ David
      M. MorseName:
      David M. Morse
                              Title:
      Co-President and Chief Executive Officer
  I,
Desiree Mejia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:  October
      6, 2009
                            By:
                            /s/ Desiree
      MejiaName:
      Desiree Mejia
                              Title:Chief
      Operating Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer
  Signed
originals of these written statements required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
  These
certifications accompany the Form 10-K to which they relate, are not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
this Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
# James A. Bayard, Sr.: A Featured Biography

**

----

James Asheton Bayard, Sr. (1767–1815) of Delaware, a prominent leader of the Federalist Party and U.S. diplomat during the War of 1812, served in the House of Representatives from 1797 to 1803 and in the Senate from 1804 to 1813. The House of Representatives appointed Bayard to serve as one of the managers of the impeachment proceedings against Senator William Blount, who was accused of conspiring to seize Spanish Florida with British aid. In the Senate, Bayard served as the chairman of a special committee to oversee the renewal charter of the First Bank of the United States in 1810 and 1811. With his Federalist colleagues in the Senate, he opposed President James Madison’s request for a declaration of war with Great Britain. Bayard resigned his Senate seat in 1813 to serve as a member of the American commission that negotiated peace with Great Britain, resulting in the Treaty of Ghent. Bayard's sons Richard Henry and James Asheton, Jr., his grandson Thomas Francis, and his great-grandson Thomas Francis, Jr., all served in the Senate.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
Signed and Filed: April 24, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

April 24, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1659 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 16:33:58 Page 1 of

1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 7, 2014

Order 

October 7, 2014

148748(58)

AFT MICHIGAN, AFT, AFL-CIO, et al,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v

STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant-Appellee.

SC: 148748

COA: 313960

Ct of Claims: 12-000104-MM

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to file a responsive 

brief to the amicus curiae brief filed by the Michigan Education Association is 

GRANTED. The responsive brief submitted on October 1, 2014, is accepted for filing.
[661 NE2d 159, 637 NYS2d 687]

#### Edward Talvy, Appellant, v American Red Cross in Greater New York et al., Respondents.

Argued October 25,1995;

decided November 29, 1995

*828APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Wisehart & Koch,*New York City *(Arthur M. Wisehart*of counsel), for appellant.

*Weil, Gotshal & Manges,*New York City *(Mark A. Jacoby, Lawrence J. Baer*and *Holly A. Zinn*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (205 AD2d 143).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
ACTIONS OF THE SEPTEMBER 6, 2022, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, (1) approves the budget of appropriated funds for fiscal year 2023 when signed into 

law by the President, and the Institutional budget totaling $679.9 million for Trust funds for 

fiscal year 2023 as reflected in this report, and (2) authorizes expenditures by the Secretary in 

accordance therewith. Any material changes in program plans incorporated into this budget 

shall be made only with the approval of the Board of Regents or its Executive Committee.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the Smithsonian Institution’s $1,293.5 million appropriation budget 

request to the Office of Management and Budget for fiscal year 2024. Any material changes in 

program plans incorporated into this budget shall be made only with the approval of the Board 

of Regents or its Executive Committee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

GAGE MOORE,

1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

ASHLEY MOORE,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 291, 2022

§ 

§ Court Below—Family Court of

§ the State of Delaware

§ 

§ File No. CN20-01144

§ Petition No. 22-02666

§ 

§

§ 

Submitted: November 18, 2022

Decided: December 8, 2022

ORDER

It appears to the Court that, on October 10, 2022, the Court denied the 

appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Senior Court Clerk directed 

the appellant to pay the filing fee by October 25, 2022, and warned him that a notice 

to show cause would issue if he did not pay the filing fee. After the appellant failed 

to pay the filing fee, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, by certified mail on 

November 2, 2022, directing the appellant to show cause why his appeal should not 

be dismissed for his failure to pay the filing fee. Postal records show that the notice 

to show cause was delivered on November 7, 2022. A timely response to the notice 

to show cause was due by November 17, 2022. To date, the appellant has not paid 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
2

the filing fee or responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this appeal is 

therefore deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/Gary F. Traynor

 Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5036 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5036

To amend title 17, United States Code, to extend expiring provisions of 
      the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2014

  Mr. Coble (for himself and Mr. Goodlatte) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 17, United States Code, to extend expiring provisions of 
      the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Satellite Television Access 
Reauthorization Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Chapter 1 of title 17, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in section 111(d)(3)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
                striking ``clause'' and inserting ``paragraph''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``clause'' and 
                inserting ``paragraph''; and
            (2) in section 119--
                    (A) in subsection (c)(1)(E), by striking ``2014'' 
                and inserting ``2019''; and
                    (B) in subsection (e), by striking ``2014'' and 
                inserting ``2019''.

SEC. 3. TERMINATION OF LICENSE.

    (a) In General.--Section 119 of title 17, United States Code, as 
amended in section 2, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Termination of License.--This section shall cease to be 
effective on December 31, 2019.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 107(a) of the Satellite 
Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010 (17 U.S.C. 119 note) is 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-2(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank,N.A. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 29, 2024**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CADMUS
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,407
<INVENTORY>                                     21,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,264
<PP&E>                                         220,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,771
<BONDS>                                         87,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,916
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,628
<SALES>                                         92,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,362
<CGS>                                           71,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,365
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,036
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.Section 1350

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned certifies that this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SS&C
Technologies, Inc.

         Date: March 31, 2003     By:/s/ William C. Stone

                                  William C. Stone
                                  Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00244-CR

Gregory Michael Klapesky, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 03-1063-K26, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s pro se brief was due in this Court on July 6, 2015. On July 14, the clerk

of this Court sent a notice to appellant that if this Court did not receive the brief or a satisfactory

response on or before Friday, July 24, a hearing before the trial court would be ordered. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.8(b). To date no response has been received from appellant.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant has abandoned the appeal. See id. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings

and recommendations. If appropriate and necessary, the court shall appoint counsel who will

effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all

findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk

of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than August 31, 2015. See id. 38.8(b)(3).
It is so ordered July 31, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Abated and Remanded

Filed: July 31, 2015

Do Not Publish

2
#### Helena Metzger, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment reversed with costs, and the motion denied with ten dollars costs, with leave to the plaintiff on the payment of the costs to interpose demurrer if she shall be advised. Opinion

*Per*Curiam.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2518

To provide for the technical integrity of the FM radio band, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 8, 2000

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide for the technical integrity of the FM radio band,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FM Radio Act of

5 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

7 It is the purpose of this Act to ensure the technical

8 integrity of the FM radio band, while permitting the intro9 duction of low power FM transmitters into such band

10 without causing harmful interference.
2

•S 2518 IS

1 SEC. 3. INTERFERENCE PROHIBITED.

2 (a) Any low power radio licensee that transmits a sig3 nal causing harmful interference (as determined by the

4 National Academy of Sciences) to the signal of any full

5 power radio station shall cease the transmission of all sig6 nals, and may not recommence transmitting signals until

7 it has taken such steps as the National Academy of

8 Sciences determines to be necessary to ensure that such

9 signals will not cause harmful interference to the signal

10 of any full power radio station.

11 (b) Any full power radio licensee may bring a cause

12 of action against a low power radio licensee that has trans13 mitted a signal that has caused harmful interference to

14 the signal of such full power licensee in any district court

15 of the United States of competent jurisdiction.

16 (c) In any action brought pursuant to the provisions

17 of subsection (b), the burden of proof shall be borne by

18 the low power radio licensee.

19 (d) In any action brought pursuant to the provisions

20 of subsection (b), the costs incurred by the National Acad21 emy of Sciences shall be borne by—

22 (1) the low power radio licensee, if the National

23 Academy of Sciences determines that the signals

24 transmitted by such licensee caused harmful inter25 ference; or
3

•S 2518 IS

1 (2) the full power radio licensee, if the National

2 Academy of Sciences determines that the signals

3 transmitted by such licensee caused harmful inter4 ference.

5 SEC. 4. DIGITAL RADIO TRANSITION.

6 The Federal Communications Commission shall com7 plete all rulemakings necessary to implement the transi8 tion to digital radio no later than June 1, 2001.

Æ