1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: 212 310 8000 

Fax: 212 310 8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: 415 496 6723 

Fax: 650 636 9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) (Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE 

REDACTED DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF 

APPLICATION PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 

327(a) AND 328(a) AND FED. R. BANKR. P. 

2014(a) AND 2016 FOR AUTHORITY TO RETAIN 

AND EMPLOY PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 

LLP AS MANAGEMENT, TAX, AND ADVISORY 

CONSULTANTS TO THE DEBTORS NUNC PRO 

TUNC TO PETITION DATE 

[No Hearing Requested] 

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead 

Case, No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Signed and Filed: May 8, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

May 08, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1919 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 12:04:35 Page 1 of

3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

Upon the Motion, dated May 1, 2019 (the “Redaction Motion”), of PG&E Corporation and 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as debtors and debtors in possession (together, “PG&E” or 

the “Debtors”) in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), pursuant to sections 

105(a) and 107(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 9018 of the 

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), Rule 1001-2(a) of the Bankruptcy 

Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Bankruptcy 

Local Rules”) and the New District Wide Procedures for Electronically Filing Sealed and Redacted 

Documents adopted by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California (the 

“Local Procedures”), for entry of an order (i) authorizing the Debtors to file with certain limited 

redactions the MSA (as defined in the Redaction Motion) related to the Application Pursuant to 11 

U.S.C. §§ 327(a) and 328(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014(a) and 2016 for Authority to Retain and Employ 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Management, Tax, and Advisory Consultants to the Debtors Nunc Pro 

Tunc to Petition Date (the “Application”), and (ii) directing that the unredacted copies of the MSA 

provided to the Court shall remain under seal and confidential and not be made available to anyone 

without the consent of the Debtors and the other parties to the MSA or further order from the Court1; 

and consideration of the Redaction Motion and the requested relief being a core proceeding pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; 

and the Court having found and determined that notice of the Redaction Motion as provided to the parties 

listed therein is reasonable and sufficient, and it appearing that no other or further notice need be 

provided; and this Court having reviewed the Redaction Motion and the Smith Declaration submitted in 

support of the Redaction Motion; and this Court having determined that the legal and factual bases set 

forth in the Redaction Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and it appearing that the 

relief requested in the Redaction Motion is in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates, creditors, 

shareholders, and all parties in interest; and upon all of the proceedings had before this Court and after 

due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, 

 

1

 Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Order shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the 

Redaction Motion. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1919 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 12:04:35 Page 2 of

3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Redaction Motion is granted as provided herein. 

2. The Debtors are authorized to file redacted copies of certain Engagement Agreements 

pursuant to section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9018. 

3. The unredacted copies of the Engagement Agreements provided to the Court are 

confidential, shall remain under seal, and shall not be made available to anyone without the consent of 

the Debtors and the parties to the Engagement Agreements. 

4. Notice of the Redaction Motion as provided therein shall be deemed good and sufficient 

and the requirements of the Bankruptcy Local Rules are satisfied by such notice. 

5. The Debtors are authorized to take all necessary actions to effectuate the relief granted 

pursuant to this Order in accordance with the Redaction Motion. 

6. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or 

related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order. 

** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1919 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 12:04:35 Page 3 of

3