alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
               HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-HI5 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the "Servicer")  pursuant to the Servicing  Agreement,  dated as of
December  28,  2006 (as  amended  from  time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential  Funding  Company,  LLC,  as master  servicer,  U.S.  Bank  National
Association,  as indenture  trustee,  and the Home Loan Trust  2006-HI5,  as the
issuing  entity,  does  hereby  certify  that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2049 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:03:53 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2049 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:03:53 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2049 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:03:53 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2049 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:03:53 Page 4 of

4
EXHIBIT B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1933-2 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 15:50:06 Page 1

of 3
COMPENSATION BY WORK TASK CODE FOR 

SERVICES RENDERED BY KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

MARCH 1, 2019 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2019 

TASK 

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT 

001 First Day Administration Motions 19.8 $10,785.00 

002 Omnibus & Miscellaneous Court Appearances 1.7 $1,105.00 

003 Legal Research 0 0 

004 General Case Administrations 145.9 $44,200.00 

005 Automatic Stay Proceedings 20.9 $15,455.00 

006 Initial Debtor Interview, Meeting of Creditors, Creditor Inquiries 16.4 $11,000.00 

007 Professional Retention and Compensation – Keller & Benvenutti 15.4 $11,125.00 

008 Professional Retention and Compensation – Other Professionals 25.2 $15,085.00 

009 Financing and Cash Collateral 8.4 $5,205.00 

010 DIP Lenders – Communication and Negotiations 0 0 

011 Creditors Committees – Communication & Negotiations 0 0 

012 Tort Committees – Communication & Negotiation 2.1 $1,620.00 

013 US Trustee – Communications & Negotiation 1.4 $910.00 

014 Employee Matters 19.0 $10,635.00 

015 Supplier Issues 22.1 $11,655.00 

016 General Asset Analysis and Recovery 0.3 $120.00 

017 Sale or Use of Property - Motions 7.6 $4,760.00 

018 Executory Contract Issues 6.0 $4,315.00 

019 Tax Issues 5.3 $2,520.00 

020 Regulatory Issues 0 0 

021 Plan – Advice, Strategy and Negotiation 4.9 $3,575.00 

022 Plan Disclosure Statements – Preparation of Documents 0 0 

023 Plan Confirmation 0 0 

024 Plan Implementation and Transition 0 0 

025 FERC Adversary Proceeding 21.6 $15,480.00 

026 Wildfire Litigation 7.2 $3,680.00 

027 Claims Review 4.2 $1,920.00 

028 Claim Disputes and Resolution 0 0 

029 Avoidance Action Analysis 0 0 

030 Non-working Travel 17.0 $5,525.00 

031 [Expenses – See Expense Summary] 0 0 

032 USDC Probation Compliance and Monitoring 68.6 $41,300.00 

033 Equity Committee 0 0 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1933-2 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 15:50:06 Page 2

of 3
 

TASK 

CODE DESCRIPTION HOURS AMOUNT 

034 Third Party Injunction Action (PERA) 32.0 $21,300.00 

035 Government Relations and Communications 0.2 $160.00 

036 Miscellaneous Litigation Issues and Advice 8.4 $4,600.00 

TOTAL 481.6 $248,035.00 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1933-2 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 15:50:06 Page 3

of 3
IB 

House Calendar No. 143 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4926 

[Report No. 113–610] 

To designate the ‘‘James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway’’ and the ‘‘James 

L. Oberstar National Scenic Byway’’ in the State of Minnesota. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2014 

Mr. NOLAN (for himself, Mr. WALZ, Mr. PAULSEN, Mr. ELLISON, Mrs. BACHMANN, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. PETERSON, and Mr. KLINE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Reported with amendments, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to 

be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 20, 2014] 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4926 RH

A BILL 

To designate the ‘‘James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway’’ 

and the ‘‘James L. Oberstar National Scenic Byway’’ 

in the State of Minnesota. 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4926 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The segment of Interstate Route 35 between milepost 

5 133 at Forest Lake, Minnesota, and milepost 259 at Duluth, 

6 Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James 

7 L. Oberstar Memorial Highway’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the segment 

11 of Interstate Route 35 referred to in section 1 shall be 

12 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James L. Oberstar Memo13 rial Highway’’. 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to designate 

a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State of Minnesota as the ‘James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway’.’’. 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 143 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4926 

[Report No. 113–610] 

A BILL 

To designate the ‘‘James L. Oberstar Memorial 

Scenic Byway’’ in the State of Minnesota. Highway’’ and the ‘‘James L. Oberstar National 

NOVEMBER 12, 2014 

Reported with amendments, referred to the House 

Calendar, and ordered to be printed 


ebenthall on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
S. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 23, 2004                    /s/ Charles S. Roberts
---------------                 -------------------------
Date                                CHARLES S. ROBERTS

<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 32 (cont.)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory
D. Fletcher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 23, 2004                     /s/ Gregory D. Fletcher
---------------                    -----------------------
Date                                 GREGORY D. FLETCHER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Reorganized Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Andrew Chan, do declare and state as follows:

1. I am employed by Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC (“Kroll”)1, the claims and 

noticing agent for the Reorganized Debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On October 4, 2022, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Kroll 

caused Notices of Transfer of Claim based on Official Form 2100A, to be served via First Class Mail 

on the date and upon the Transferor and Transferee, as set forth on the Claim Transfer Service List 

attached hereto as Exhibit A

3. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that the

foregoing is true and correct and that if called upon as a witness, I could and would competently testify 

thereto.

Executed this 4th day of October 2022, at New York, NY.

/s/ Andrew Chan

Andrew Chan

1 Effective March 29, 2022, Prime Clerk LLC changed its name to Kroll Restructuring Administration LLC.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13049 Filed: 10/07/22 Entered: 10/07/22 10:07:59 Page 1

of 3
Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13049 Filed: 10/07/22 Entered: 10/07/22 10:07:59 Page 2

of 3
Exhibit A

Claim Transfer Service List

Served via First Class Mail on the Date Set Forth Below

Docket # Transferor Transferee Date of Service

12679

OPeak LLC

Attn: Todd Westhus

745 Fifth Avenue

Suite 1604

New York, NY 10151

PMK Contractors, LLC

c/o Binder & Malter, LLP

Attn: Christian Binder and Robert G. 

Harris

2775 Park Avenue

Santa Clara, CA, 95050

PMK Contractors, LLC 

Attn: Preet Johal

1580 Chabot Ct., 2nd Fl. 

Hayward, CA 94545

August 12, 2022

12820

Linda Wright

c/o Bowles & Verna LLP

Attn: Richard T. Bowles

2121 N. California Blvd., #875

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Linda Wright

1310 Winchester Way

Auburn, CA 95602

Tamie Wright Dasse

c/o Bowles & Verna LLP

Attn: General Counsel

2121 N. California Blvd., #875

Walnut Creek, CA 94596

August 26, 2022

12981

Donatus Okhomina, Jr.

c/o Siegel, Lewitter, Malkani

Attn: Jonathan Henry Siegel

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 307

Oakland, CA 94612

Tammy Okhomina

400 Brians Way

Dixon, CA 95620

September 30, 2022

In re: PG Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13049 Filed: 10/07/22 Entered: 10/07/22 10:07:59 Page 3

of 3
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 27, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-571

Lower Tribunal No. 17-1186

________________

Madelyn Valdes Roman,

Appellant,

vs.

In Re: Estate of Maria M. Ignarra,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton 

Hirsch, Judge.

Madelyn Valdes Roman, in proper person.

Paul M. Cowan & Associates, P.A., and Paul M. Cowan, Anthony M. 

Diblasi and Manuel A. Celaya, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. Swartz v. Russell, 481 So. 2d 64, 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) 

(“[T]he circuit court, in its probate capacity, [has] jurisdiction to determine the 

right of possession of real property in matters relating to the settlement of 

the estates of decedents. Consequently, the probate court has jurisdiction 

to handle the dispute over the right to possession of the estate’s real 

property.”).
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12986 Filed: 09/20/22 Entered: 09/20/22 14:56:18 Page 1

of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12986 Filed: 09/20/22 Entered: 09/20/22 14:56:18 Page 2

of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS  OF PRESIDENT  AND CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER AND CHIEF  FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATIONS

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Nutrition  21,  Inc., a New York
corporation  (the  "Company"),  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  Gail
Montgomery,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and Paul
Intlekofer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby
certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gail Montgomery
--------------------------------------
Gail Montgomery
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2005

/s/ Paul Intlekofer
--------------------------------------
Paul Intlekofer
Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2005

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nutrition  21, Inc.  and will be retained by Nutrition  21, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

p1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143746

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 14 3746 COA: 304815 Kent CC: 10-006383-FC JOSHUA STEVEN MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 3, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*James H. Bean, Respondent.

*Verdict*— set *aside for perjury*— *witness hostile to the side calling him*— *effect upon the question whether a case is made for the jury.*

A verdict which, has "been obtained by means of perjury will not be permitted to stand.

The fact that a witness called by the plaintiff is hostile to the plaintiff, and that his testimony is evidently false, will be considered in determining whether a sufficient case has been presented for the consideration of the jury.

Appeal by the plaintiff, The People of the State of New York, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Franklin on the 22d day of October, 1894, upon the verdict of a jury rendered after a trial at the Franklin Circuit, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 19th day of October, 1894, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

The action was brought to recover a penalty of $100 for an alleged violation of section 1, chapter 534 of the Laws of 18T9, known as the Game Law. The complaint charged that the defendant had venison in his possession on the 2d day of January, 1892, contrary to the statute.

*William P.*Oantwell, for the appellant.

*Samuel A. Beman*and *Okas. A. Burke,*for the respondent.

*521HebRick, J.:

Where the court can see that a verdict has been obtained by transparent perjury I do not think it should permit such verdict to stand.

It is true that in this case it is extremely doubtful whether upon the plaintiffs’ own ease there was sufficient evidence to warrant a verdict in their favor, yet I am inclined to think, as did the trial court, that there was some slight evidence upon which the jury might find the nature of the article in question.

The weakness of the plaintiffs’ case arises from the palpable perjury of the witness Miller. The fact that he was a hostile witness, although sworn on behalf of the plaintiffs, and the evident falsity of his testimony, might well be taken into consideration in weighing those portions of his evidence which slightly tend to prove the plaintiffs’ case.

The equally palpable perjury of Perkins, the only witness sworn for the defendant, exclusive of the defendant himself, rather gives weight to, than detracts from, the slight case made by the plaintiffs’ evidence. A judgment founded upon such evidence should not be permitted to stand. The plaintiffs should be given, if they so elect, another opportunity to establish their cause of action, and the witnesses a chance to repent and tell the truth, if that be possible.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Mayham, P. J., concurred in result; PutNAM, J., not acting.

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
First Department,

January Term, 1893.

#### The First National Bank of Sing Sing, Respondent, v. Caleb B. Knevals and others, Assignees, etc., Appellants.

—Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

O’Brien, J.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Net Talk.com, Inc. a
Florida corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Anastasios Kyriakides, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Anastasios Kyriakides                                     | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Anastasios Kyriakides                                         | 
|Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) | 
|Date: September 4, 2013                                       |
OFFICF. OF THE ATCORNEY QE:NlSAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

-c.- 

-- 

8iea.8 proTi4.r; 00: 
I8 tha .uo ot Atlanta f#a Stoker Wltfeh vu oitm, 

tbo Bvprom Oowt at Our&a hrld Ohat u&r the pnnirionr 

of ula aration 484 nalty urohwd with w.rb nomy uaa 

l xugiron t tautloa bf l l P tys That eplni;; waa$l$p-- 

d on July JIO, 19% EOWOYU', on Prbrua 

tEa uu of 90atr ~8. Blair, M 9. W. (6f 486, th&i\lprsam 

Court 41 TUUiOrtee held that 8Wh propor ir not l rorrpt 

iron tuaion by shr stasr. Thi8 4480 148 appOd.6 to th@ 

8aopr.m Goart of tho Unitob St&o@, rhioh oa 9444mb4r 4, 

lass fa UI OPirit?~ bT J<. zU8tiOa oUdOW, 4.ffiXVU6 tbr 

Wlspmt cad OpfBba of the Saxwomo Couxt oi Twnouoo, 

bol&fne rash pro&mrtl to ba tax&lo bl tb Btrta u4 l xY 

bhpp~~ln( th0 &i&kg Of th4 f&Or& f3&~84 

E.z n %ha Atlanta vs. aLok l w*r ‘hotter V8. mnnl 4u0 a00 0. 8. au4, 84 8, ct. us, w L. tdr 568. m40, 

yog dll uo that *ho Suprw Court of the Uaitod Strtrr 

hu wttfod th q&t)l$iOQ &n8ut tha rxe~tion. 

Jurtharamr on &ugwt U USS, 00 488 -0tab 

srotion 4546, 2% tfait*d atutor Gob Annatato Dgr , sa fOllOW8~ 

"It 464ar A88+4biuty sod rxempt 

atrtw of gqamtr of bomfito - myment# or bmofltr Aw or to booom au@ 

shall not bs l rrigaabl6r, aa4 suoh pyrats a a 4 0 t6, or a wooant o f, l benoil414Py a a 6er l 

la 

Of tbr trW8 r Oh tb l6 

: to *4 twa Bl a b e l Xo m,fmp 8 a tulmtio n, rhall bo ox-t iron the 4I.d~ 

of orodltor~, an& &all not br liable to 

l ttwharnt, la *ror l l lr um b l or Ona er 

say la& or oqdtrblo proooea whatever, 

either boioro or attor nootgt bl t&o 

boaofleiu~. Saeh prtwirioar &all not 

attaoh to olab~8 of tha Udtob. 8tatm8 

ad8 

9 

UuMr wuh hws nor rhal1 tha 

l x4a!# on h4rdn 40ntaln46 48 to 04x4- 

tion oxtend to any pfogmrt~ purehwod in 

P 

ut 6r wh6lly w&t of ouah wylWBt#. 

Au&. 18, lQSS, 4. 510, I: 8, 49 mat. 

609.)" 

IOU Will thW #a0 that in th18 AotthO haCr48@ hW 

l xgrauly denlad tha ccamption tb prowrtr pu~ohaaed out of 

8UOh paflpCntOe 

Sl.aao@ our atat. c6S8titUti4E sontdJu an autboritf 
lbnor4blr ullnt A. BurEun, P4. 8 

for ita l x*~tIoa, Art1410 8, Wtioa I, theroof nqulnr. 

thrt lt br turQ. TOW qU48tiOB th4NfOn mU8t n44.88-117 

bo anmar. in tb Wg8tiVO. 

Tour0 rrry truly 

ATTORJIEI OEIIKRAL OF TESLAB 

ATTORNEY GENERAL
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICOA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date August 21, 2006                             By: /s/ George Strouthopoulos
                                                         -----------------------
                                               Name:     George Strouthopoulos
                                              Title:     Chief Executive Officer





         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided Sherb & Co., LP and
will be retained by ICOA, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99(i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Bradford,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




/s/ Mark D. Bradford
--------------------
Mark D. Bradford
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 14, 2003


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1671    Filed: 04/25/19    Entered: 04/25/19 07:47:11    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1671    Filed: 04/25/19    Entered: 04/25/19 07:47:11    Page 2 of2