alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Army South, 1st SFAB begin pre-deployment training conference
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Army South, 1st SFAB begin pre-deployment training conference</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By Leanne Thomas</b> <span class="date">/ Published Feb. 23, 2021</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text">JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO, Texas, </span>
    <p>U.S. Army South kicked-off the Operation Alamo Shield pre-deployment training conference Feb. 23 at their headquarters to prepare 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade personnel for future missions in Colombia, Honduras and Panama.<br />
 </p>

<p>The 1st SFAB deployments are in support of U.S. Southern Command’s enhanced counter narcotics operations, which was announced by President Trump Apr. 1, 2020.</p>

<p>Maj. Gen. Daniel R. Walrath, U.S. Army South commanding general, provided opening remarks and said this is the first of hopefully many pre-deployment training conferences to support the 1st SFAB deployment cycles.  </p>

<p>“The idea is to share information to minimize gaps involved with rotating deployments and maintain momentum by establishing a common understanding across all stakeholders in this mission,” said Walrath.</p>

<p>The conference is a result of recommendations that came from SFAB leaders returning from the first SFAB deployment iteration in Colombia.</p>

<p>“We asked the leadership, ‘what can we do better to prepare the teams?’ And this conference is in part due to their recommendations,” said Walrath. </p>

<p>During the three-day conference, attendees will attend country overview briefings, sustainment briefings and legal briefings to gain more insight for the missions prior to deploying to each country.</p>

<p>“The idea also came from some of my own experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan. Prior to each deployment, all of the mission stakeholders would come together to discuss how the mission sets evolved over time, which better prepared us for the deployments,” said Walrath.</p>

<p>The 1st SFAB is an elite U.S. Army unit specifically trained to advise and assist partner nation countries. The presence of the SFAB in Colombia, Honduras and Panama directly aligns with U.S. Army South priorities to counter threats alongside partner nations to defend our way of life.</p>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**203 CAF 14-01288**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF AUSTIN JOHNSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHERRY PRICHARD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

--------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF SHERRY PRICHARD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V
AUSTIN JOHNSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

--------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF SHERRY PRICHARD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V
AUSTIN JOHNSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PAUL M. DEEP, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND RESPONDENTAPPELLANT.
JOHN G. KOSLOSKY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Julia M. Brouillette, R.), entered June 27, 2014 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 and article 8. The order, among other things, directed that Sherry Prichard shall continue to have sole legal and physical custody of the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated in the decision at Family Court. We add only that we reject the contention of petitioner-respondent father that the Court Attorney Referee did not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter. The parties and their attorneys signed a stipulation in 2012 setting forth that a judicial hearing officer or court attorney referee would hear and determine the custody matter and “all future modifications/violation proceedings concerning this action,” and thus the Referee did not err in denying the father’s oral request that the matter be heard by a**-2- 203 CAF 14-01288**  Family Court judge ( see Matter of Johnson v Streich-McConnell , 66 AD3d 1526, 1527).

Entered: March 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 14, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

126188 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan MAURICE HELLEBUYCK, Plaintiff, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 126188 COA: 243940 Macomb CC: 01-002861-CK FARM BUREAU GENE RAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 28, 2 004, the application for leav e to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision in Rory v Continenta l Insurance Company (Docket No. 126747). On order of the Court, the opinion having been issued on July 28, 2005, 473 Mich 457 (2005), the a pplication for leave to appeal th e February 10, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is again considere d, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and W EAVER , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider Rory v Continen tal Insurance Company , 473 Mich 457 (2005).

l1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 14, 2005

Clerk
#### In the Matter of The Board of Rapid Transit Commissioners (Lexington Avenue Route). In the Matter of The Board of Rapid Transit Commissioners (Third Avenue Route). In the Matter of The Board of Rapid Transit Commissioners (Seventh and Eighth Avenue Route). In the Matter of The Board of Rapid Transit Commissioners (Fourteenth Street Route). In the Matter of the Board of Rapid Transit Commissioners (White Plains Road Route).

Applications granted and time extended for two years from October 15, 1911. Orders to be settled on notice.
B 2100A (Form 2100A) (12/15)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

__________ District Of __________

In re ________________________________, Case No. ________________

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). Transferee

hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other

than for security, of the claim referenced in this evidence and notice.

______________________________________ ____________________________________

Name of Transferee Name of Transferor

Name and Address where notices to transferee Court Claim # (if known):

should be sent: Amount of Claim:

Date Claim Filed:

Phone: ______________________________ Phone:

Last Four Digits of Acct #: ______________ Last Four Digits of Acct. #: __________

Name and Address where transferee payments

should be sent (if different from above): 

Phone:

Last Four Digits of Acct #:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the

best of my knowledge and belief.

By:__________________________________ Date:____________________________

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

507 Capital LLC

15 E 67th Street, 6th Floor

New York, NY 10065

RiverPark Advisors LLC

156 W 56th Street, Suite 1704

New York, NY 10019 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2730 Filed: 06/24/19 Entered: 06/24/19 12:42:20 Page 1 of

2
EVIDENCE OF TRANSFER OF CLAIM

 For value received, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, GE Grid Solutions 

LLC Seller hereby acknowledges that it has irrevocably sold, transferred, and assigned to 

RiverPark Strategic Income Fund Purchaser , and interest in and to 

the Se Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company Debtor Claim as set forth 

in the Agreement between Seller and Purchaser. Seller further waives any objections to the transfer 

of the Claim on the books and records of the Debtor and the Bankruptcy Court, and consents to 

tor in respect thereof, pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(1). 

Dated: June 21, 2019 GE Grid Solutions LLC 

By: 

Name: Jeffrey Keogh 

Title: Sr. Finance Manager 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2730 Filed: 06/24/19 Entered: 06/24/19 12:42:20 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 14, 2008     
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 14, 2008     





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In Re: Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM) (Lead Case) 

PG&E Corporation 

Chapter 11 

 and 

(Jointly Administered) 

Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company, 

COURT CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 

I, the undersigned, a regularly appointed clerk of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern 

District of California, served a copy of the foregoing document(s): 

 Notice of Appeal and Election- by Creditor Spiro Jannings- Dkt. #13662

 Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Dated 03/27/2023-Dkt. #13646

That I, in the performance of my duties as such Clerk, served a copy of the foregoing document(s) by 

depositing in the regular United States mail at San Francisco, California on the date shown below, in a 

sealed envelope bearing the lawful frank of the United States Bankruptcy Court addressed as listed below: 

Office of the U.S. Trustee / SF 

Phillip J. Burton Federal Building 

450 Golden Gate Ave. 5th Fl., #05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102 

 for PG& E Corporation and 

Pacific Gas & Electric Company 

 Creditor/Appellant

KELLER AND BENVENUTTI, LLP 

Jane Kim 

Thomas B. Rupp

650 California St., #1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Spiro Jannings 

1304 Shortridge Ave., Unit C

San Jose, CA 95116

Dated: April 10, 2023 /s/ Monica Tartaglia______ 

Monica Tartaglia, Deputy Clerk 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13663 Filed: 04/10/23 Entered: 04/10/23 14:56:48 Page 1

of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        Subsidiary Name                  Jurisdiction of Organization
----------------------------------       ----------------------------
<S>                                      <C>
SS&C Ventures, Inc.                      Connecticut
HC Investments Ltd.                      British Virgin Islands
HedgeWare, Inc.                          Delaware
Quantra Software Corporation             Delaware
SSC Direct.com, Inc.                     Delaware
SS&C Pacific, Inc.                       Delaware
Shepro Braun Systems, Inc.               Illinois
SAVID International Inc.                 New Jersey
The SAVID Group, Inc.                    New York
The Brookside Corporation                Rhode Island
SS&C Fund Services N.V.                  Netherlands Antilles
SS&C Fund Services (B.V.I.) Limited      British Virgin Islands
SS&C Technologies PTE Ltd.               Singapore
SS&C Technologies, KK                    Japan
SS&C Technologies Limited                United Kingdom
SS&C Technologies Sdn. Bhd.              Malaysia
SS&C Technologies B.V.                   Netherlands
SS&C (Bahamas) Ltd.                      Bahamas
OMR Systems Corporation                  New Jersey
OMR Systems International Limited        New Jersey
OMR Systems United Kingdom               United Kingdom
OMR Systems S.A.R.L.                     France
EisnerFast LLC                           New York
1651943 Ontario Inc.                     Ontario
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York v. Sylvester F. Wilson.

— The appellant has leave to put this case upon the February calendar of this court and file his cases upon appeal and notice the same for argument; and when the case comes up for argument, and thus the appellant has shown his good faith, the court will determine whether they will not set aside the dismissal already taken, and then hear the appeal upon the merits.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              BOWATER INCORPORATED
                             1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                     AS AMENDED AND RESTATED JANUARY 1, 1997


         WHEREAS, Bowater Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
established the Bowater Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), and
amended and restated the Plan in its entirety, effective January 1, 1997; and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan, to change a part of the
definition of "Change in Control," thereunder;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective February 26,
1999, as follows:

Section 1(h)(iv) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

         "(iv)    the date on which less than 50% of the total membership of the
                  Board consists of Continuing Directors."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be
executed by its duly authorized officer this 11th day of May, 1999.


                                     BOWATER INCORPORATED



                                     By: /s/ James T. Wright
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                             James T. Wright

                                     Title: Vice President - Human Resources
                                            ------------------------------------


                                      -1-
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 22

- 10494

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus MATHEW CREIGHTON MYERS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:21

- cr

- 20053

- MGC

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10494 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 12/22/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 10494

Before W ILSON , J ORDAN , and B RANCH , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Jose

- Carlos Antonia Villanueva , appointed counsel for Mathew Creighton Myers in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursua nt to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ourindependent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Myers’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 22-10494 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 12/22/2022 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,517
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (941)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,779
<PP&E>                                         168,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                (34,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,369
<BONDS>                                        109,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,962
<SALES>                                        104,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,075
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,209)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,131)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,966
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH
REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                       11,963,360 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                 4,166,389 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             16,129,749 
<PP&E>                       61,135,106 
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               83,697,664 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        35,201,025 
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                   48,412,139 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 83,697,664 
<SALES>                       6,264,593 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              6,882,639 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,694,936 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                336,827 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,429,460 
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,965,853 
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           1,965,853 
<DISCONTINUED>               20,826,930 
<EXTRAORDINARY>              (1,259,118)
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                 21,533,665 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    122.59 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    122.59 

        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File numbers 333-07205, 333-07207, 333-07211, 333-07213,
333-52295, 333-82131, 333-95401, 333-38144, 333-38142, and 333-38140) of SS&C
Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2001 relating to the
consolidated financial statements which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
---------------------------------------------------------

Hartford, Connecticut
March 29, 2001

                                     Page 47
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)



The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Cadmus Communications Corporation, certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Cadmus Communications Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and
shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                                      |  |                                                  
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce V. Thomas                   |  | /s/ Paul K. Suijk                                
|Bruce V. Thomas                       |  | Paul K. Suijk                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)     
|                                      | 
|February 9, 2005                      |  | February 9, 2005