alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Howell Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard K.
Hebert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ RICHARD K. HEBERT
------------------------
Richard K. Hebert
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002


<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Howell Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allyn R.
Skelton, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ ALLYN R. SKELTON, II
------------------------
Allyn R. Skelton, II
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2002
Order filed January 23, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00249-CV

____________

JUDITH KING, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIR TO KENNETH KING, 

DECEASED, Appellant

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE 

TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERS OF ACCREDITED 

MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2004-4 ASSET BACKED NOTES BY ITS 

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., 

Appellees

On Appeal from Probate Court No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 402647-403

O R D E R

On June 8, 2017, this court abated this appeal because appellant petitioned for 

voluntary bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern 

District of Texas, under cause number 17-33478. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. 
2

Through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system, the 

court has learned that the bankruptcy case was closed June 20, 2017. The parties 

failed to advise this court of the bankruptcy court action.

Unless any party to the appeal files, by February 12, 2020, a motion 

demonstrating good cause to retain this appeal, this appeal will be reinstated and 

dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002  (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(A) And (B))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in
his capacity as an officer of Metaldyne Corporation (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.

|Date: August 18, 2005 |  | /s/TIMOTHY D. LEULIETTETimothy D. Leuliette
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 10, 2009, pursuant to Section                           ( print page 4423)                        6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on Clean Diesel V (“Clean Diesel V”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the following parties have withdrawn from this venture: BP America, Inc. Global Fuels Technology, Naperville, IL and Federal Mogul, Inc., Plymouth, MI.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Clean Diesel V intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On January 10, 2008, Clean Diesel V filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 25, 2008 (73 FR 10064).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 9, 2009. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 17, 2009 (74 FR 66995).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-1240 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 16, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 04-20469

HENDRY CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant,

VERSUS
RENDA MARINE, INC., a foreign corporation,

Def endant-Counter Claimant-Appellee,

FEDERAL INSURANCE CO., a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

4:02-CV-2395

Before DAVIS, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
After reviewing the record in this case and based upon the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we affirm the district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in its Memorandum and Opinion dated March 16, 2004.

AFFIRMED.
PAUL PARTRIDGE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2427

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed October 11, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Paul Partridge, pro se

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 10.44


 





Loan Agreement


 


	Party A:	REN Xiaoheng
	 	 
	Party B:	Beijing Zhongtulian Culture & Education Development Center


 


		1.	Regarding the Loan



 


To support Party B’s need for business development, Party
A loaned ¥5 million to Party B on May 4, 2016 and designated Party B’s account as the one for receiving the wire deposit
of the said amount.


 


Upon discussion between the Parties hereto, it is determined that
the interest rate on the aforementioned loan is the floating rate on the basis of the bench mark lending rate for the same period
of 1-year to 3-year loans published by the People’s Bank of China.


 


		2.	Regarding the Repayment



 


Party A agrees that the term of the loan is two years starting from
the date of receiving the loan and that the loan is due May 3, 2018.


 


Party B promises that, if financial condition allows, Party B will
prepay in full or in part the aforementioned loan.


 


		3.	Other Matters



 


This Agreement will become effective upon the date of execution
by both Party A and Party B.


 


This Agreement is in two counterparts and will become effective
upon the date of execution by both Party A and Party B.


 


 


	Party A:	/s/ REN Xiaoheng
	 	 
	Party B:	/seal/ Beijing Zhongtulian Culture Education Development Center.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

            THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

                          ADVANCED RADIO TELECOM CORP.

                     Pursuant to Section 242 of the General
                    Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

                                      ****


         Advanced Radio Telecom Corp., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify as follows:

         FIRST: Article I of the Corporation's Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as set forth below:

                The name of this Corporation is First Avenue Networks, Inc.

         SECOND: The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, namely, by
the Board of Directors in accordance with Section 141 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware and by the stockholders of the Corporation in
accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Certificate to be
duly executed in its corporate name this 14th day of February 2002.


                                                    ADVANCED RADIO TELECOM CORP.



                                                    By: /s/ Thomas M. Walker
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Name:
                                                        Title:

                                      -2-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20328

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DONNELL HAFFORD, also known as Donnell Halford,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-426-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donnell Hafford has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Hafford has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20328 Document: 00513472512 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-20328

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-20328 Document: 00513472512 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         307,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  674,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (58,485)
<INVENTORY>                                    246,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,276,933
<PP&E>                                       5,023,859
<DEPRECIATION>                              (4,253,321)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,426,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          742,661
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,136,697
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,908,905)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,426,517
<SALES>                                        976,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               976,370
<CGS>                                          699,280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  699,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,931
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,931
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,931
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8178** 

In R e: KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR , Appellant

.

--------------------- -------- CHRISTOPHER GEORGE WASHINGTON, Petitioner,

v.
WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON ,
Res pondent

– Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. ( 2:09

- cv - 00560

- HCM

- TEM )

Submitted : March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, M OTZ, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kenneth Edward Barbour, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Barbour, a three

- striker under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006), who filed a
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition on behalf of a fellow prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order providing him with notice that signing pleadings on behalf of another may be considered the unlicensed practice of law , and advising the fellow prisoner that if he desires to file a § 2254 petition he must do so personally or through counsel and sign the petition under penalty of perjury. This court may exercise jur isdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Barbour seeks to appeal is

ne ither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis , deny Barbour’s motion to expedite a decision in this appeal , and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2774

_____________________________

DUSTIN SCOTT BUNDY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Terrance R. Ketchel, Judge.

April 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Dustin Scott Bundy, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

M. Ryan Pinkston (SBN 310971) 

rpinkston@seyfarth.com 

Christopher J. Harney (SBN 322306) 

charney@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for 

Turner Construction Company

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☒ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☐ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’S 

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2572 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:45:45 Page 1 of

7
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(b)(3) and 546(b), Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) hereby 

gives notice of its perfection of, maintenance and continuation of perfection of, and intention to enforce 

to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, see, e.g., California Civil Code § 8400 et seq., Turner’s 

duly recorded mechanic’s lien for labor, equipment, material, and services provided by Turner to Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company, as more fully described in the attached Exhibit A. See Village Nurseries v. 

Gould (In re Baldwin Builders), 232 B.R. 406 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1999); Village Nurseries v. Greenbaum, 

101 Cal. App. 4th 26 (2002). This notice is in addition to, and not in lieu of, Turner’s right and intention 

to enforce its lien to the fullest extent permitted by law. Turner reserves all rights. 

DATED: June 18, 2019 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ M. Ryan Pinkston 

M. Ryan Pinkston 

 Christopher J. Harney 

Attorneys for Turner Construction Company

56430669v.1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2572 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:45:45 Page 2 of

7
EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2572 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:45:45 Page 3 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2572 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:45:45 Page 4 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2572 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:45:45 Page 5 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2572 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:45:45 Page 6 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2572 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:45:45 Page 7 of

7
Exhibit 10.2First Chester County Corporation2009 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLANEXHIBIT C - LONG TERM INCENTIVE
PLANMAY 4, 2009 Portions
of this exhibit have been redacted and are the subject of a confidential
treatment request filed with the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange
Commission The
following are the parameters for the 2009 restricted stock grants for
executives at First Chester County Corporation: I.
Participants/Categories  Category
1
Chief Executive
Officer PresidentCategory
2
EVPsCategory
3
SVPsCategory
4
Managing
Director of AHB Division President
 of AHB Division  II.
Grant Date: TBD in accordance with action of the Personnel and
 Compensation CommitteeIII.
Grant Size  Threshold

Target

OptimumCategory 1 - 
 CEO/President

Performance
 Restricted

1,500
 shares

3,000
 shares

4,500
 sharesService
 
 Restricted



2,000
 shares

Category 2  EVPs

Performance
 Restricted

750
 shares

1,500
 shares

2,250
 sharesService
 Restricted



1,000
 shares

Category 3  SVPs

Performance
 Restricted

325
 shares

650
 shares

975
 sharesService
 
 Restricted



425
 shares

Category 4  AHBJ. Deitch

Performance
 Restricted

1250
 shares

2500
 shares

3750
 sharesA. Smith

Performance Restricted

1000
 shares

2000
 shares

3000
 shares Numbers of
shares will not be interpolated between points for performance between points.   Exhibit 10.2First Chester County Corporation2009 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLANEXHIBIT C - LONG TERM INCENTIVE
PLANMAY 4, 2009IV.
RestrictionsA.
Performance restrictions:To be measured in 2012 based upon
performance for the
year ending 12/31/11

Threshold

Target

OptimumEPS (weight - 50%)


$
**



$
**



$
**ROAA  3 year average (weight  50%)



**
%



**
%



**
%Vesting to occur on February 28, 2012 subject
to continued employment as provided in Plan (assuming threshold performance is
met)

B.
Service Restrictions:Vesting to occur on February 28, 2012 subject
to continued employment as provided in Plan (assuming threshold performance is
met)

V.
Expense/TaxationA. Fair market
value will be expensed on pro rata basis over remainder of vesting period, when
deemed that an award will be paid, according to accounting practices

B. Participant
 ordinary income at fair market value as restrictions are met/vested;
participant responsible for payment of tax withholding due upon vesting

VI.
DividendsPaid
immediately from date of grant on all shares awarded, including shares granted
but not vested; taxable as ordinary income

VII.
Change of Control, Retirement, Death, DisabilityA. Accelerate
vesting of shares at change of control

B.
Acceleration of vesting at Retirement, Death, & Disability on pro rata
basis as per the 2008 Plan

** This portion has been redacted pursuant to
a confidential treatment request.