alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	U.S. Coast Guard Hosts Maritime Law Enforcement Symposium
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">U.S. Coast Guard Hosts Maritime Law Enforcement Symposium</h1>
    </div>
    

    <div><b>By U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command & U.S. Fourth Fleet</b> <span class="date">/ Published July 19, 2017</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>CALLAO, Peru (NNS) – U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Pacific Tactical Law Enforcement Team headed a maritime law enforcement symposium as part of UNITAS 2017 at Peruvian Naval Base Callao, July 16.</p>
<p>UNITAS is an annual exercise is hosted by Peru, and focuses on strengthening our existing regional partnerships and encourages establishing new relationships through the exchange of maritime mission-focused knowledge and expertise throughout the exercise. </p>
<p>USCG Lt. Andrew Ray headed the symposium delivering remarks by going through USCG protocol on how they combat organized transnational crime to include counter drug trafficking, counter weapons trafficking, and trafficking of human beings.</p>
<p>In conjunction with the symposium the USCG personnel conducted a boarding progression walk through on a 90 foot Peruvian navy vessel, outlining the different boarding phases, key aspects of boarding and highlighting common habits used by smugglers such as hidden compartments and other smuggling trends.</p>
<p>“The goal is always to have successful prosecution of an interdiction case,” said Ray. “Integrating with our partner nations allows us to present a unified front, and interactions such as the walk through, help the coast guard accomplish that mission through subject matter expert exchanges, increasing knowledge and awareness of the complete process from an interdiction to prosecution.”</p>
<p>Integrating with partner nations allows the USCG to conduct joint interdictions and increases collaborative efforts in multiple jurisdictions. Having partner nation support allows for more pooled resources that contribute to more interdictions and mission success.</p>
<p>While deployed in support of UNITAS 2017, USCG is under the operational control of Commander, Task Force 138 (CTF 138), Rear Adm. Sean Buck, commander, U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command/U.S. 4th Fleet (COMUSNAVSO/C4F). </p>
<br /><br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Application of Horace Pettit, a Member of the Bar of the State of Pennsylvania, for Admission to the Bar.

Inasmuch as the application was first made in the First Department of this court and denied, this application, being upon similar papers, is denied.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
     The financial data schedule contains summary financial information 
     extracted from the form 10-Q of Howell Corporation for the nine months 
     ended September 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
     to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-mos   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>               Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                            232 
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   12035  
<ALLOWANCES>                      153
<INVENTORY>                        40
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                15396
<PP&E>                         452152
<DEPRECIATION>                 282320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 204988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           41243
<BONDS>                        107500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                       690
<COMMON>                         5472
<OTHER-SE>                      44818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   204988
<SALES>                         39059   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                39059
<CGS>                           29345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   29345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                66118 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               8206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (67537)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (23180)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (44357)
<DISCONTINUED>                    396
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                   (43961)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (8.37) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (8.37)
        

</TABLE>
#### W. A. GODDARD v. SOUTHERN DESK COMPANY.

(Filed 16 June, 1930.)

Master and Servant O b — In this case held: evidence failed to show negligent failure of employer to provide reasonably safe place to work.

Where in an action to recover damages for a personal injury sustained by the plaintiff, the evidence tends only to show that the plaintiff’s foot slipped upon a cross-tie while employed in loading a log upon a carriage operated on rails, causing the injury in suit: *Held,,*a judgment as of non-suit was properly entered under the general principle that an employer’s duty to provide an employee a safe place to work does not apply to “ordinary, everyday conditions” readily observable, where there is no reason to suppose that injury would result.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit by *Stack, J.,*at January Term, 1930, of Catawba.

Affirmed.

*D. L. Bussell for plaintiff.*

*Thos. P. Pruitt and E. B. Cline for defendant.*

*23Adams, J.

Id connection witb its business of manufacturing desks, opera chairs, and church pews the defendant operated an “out-door sawmill.” The plaintiff, one of its employees, assisted in sawing the logs and bearing the lumber from the carriage. The wheels of the carriage moved back and forth upon iron rails which rested upon and were fastened to crossties by spikes. The logs were held upon the carriage by dogs or hooks. The basic allegations of the plaintiff’s suit are that when in the act of placing a log upon the carriage he put his right foot upon the end or near the end of a crosstie, slipped, and fell, and that before he could get up the carriage ran against his leg and inflicted serious and permanent injury as a result of the defendant’s negligent failure to provide for the plaintiff a reasonably safe place in which to do his work. It is specifically alleged that the defendant was negligent in failing to put a floor upon the crossties; but it is not alleged that the defendant knowingly or carelessly employed incompetent fellow-servants.

The two exceptions to the exclusion of evidence are so clearly untenable as to require no discussion; and the judgment of nonsuit must be affirmed upon the general principle that an employer’s duty to provide for an employee a reasonably safe place in which to work does not apply to “ordinary everyday conditions” where the situation is readily observable and there is no reason to suppose that injury will result. *Smith v. Ritch,*196 N. C., 12; *Bunn v. R. R.,*169 N. C., 648. According to the allegation and the evidence the plaintiff’s fall was due to the fact that his foot slipped from the end of a crosstie. Judgment is

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Albert Wilson, Impleaded, etc.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted.
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

Theundersigned officers of AVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certify to their knowledge and in their respective capacities that theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certificationis attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 9, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ UNA S. RYAN                       |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Name:  |   | Una S. Ryan, Ph.D.                    |
|                      |   | Title: |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |   |   |   |                                  |
| Date: August 9, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ AVERY W. CATLIN                   |
|                      |   | Name:  |   | Avery W. Catlin                       |
|                      |   | Title: |   | Senior Vice President and             |
|                      |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File numbers 333-07205, 333-07207, 333-07211,
333-07213, 333-52295, 333-82131, 333-95401, 333-38144, 333-38142, 333-38140 and
333-61628) of SS&C Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 1, 2002
relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
---------------------------------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
March 29, 2002
<PAGE>
 
               [LETTERHEAD OF YORK, NEEL & COMPANY APPEARS HERE]

                     MILLER, MAYER, SULLIVAN & STEVENS LLP
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                      "INNOVATORS OF SOLUTION TECHNOLOGY"
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Board of Directors
Pioneer Financial Corporation
Winchester, Kentucky


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pioneer
Financial Corporation and Subsidiary as of September 30, 1996 and 1995 and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three year period ended September 30, 1996. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the management of
Pioneer Financial Corporation (Company).  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pioneer Financial
Corporation and Subsidiary as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended September 30, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.


/s/ Miller, Mayer, Sullivan & Stevens    /s/ York, Neel & Company, LLP

Lexington, Kentucky                      Owensboro, Kentucky
November 11, 1996                        November 11, 1996
ACTIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VIA ELECTRONIC BALLOT

OCTOBER 12, 2022

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, recognizes the contributions of Senator Patrick Leahy to the Smithsonian Institution 

and names the Secretary’s Parlor in honor of the Senator for a period of twenty (20) years, from 

the date the recognition signage is installed.
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## Courts in the Era of #WeToo: How Judges and Court Managers Can Cooperate to Address Gender-based Harassment and Abuse Train the Trainer Event

Apply Today! Funded by State Justice Institute, The National Association for Court Management  (NACM), National Association of Women Judges (NAWJ), and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) have collaborated together creating the Courts in the Era of #WeToo Project.

Upcoming Training: How Judges and Court Managers Can Cooperate to Address Gender-based Harassment and Abuse. A train-the-trainer event for judicial officers and court administrators will be held on March 16th and 17th, wishing to utilize this curriculum.

Applications due Friday, February 4th. Apply here: Application to Attend – Courts in the Era of #WeToo: How Judges and Court Managers Can Cooperate to Address Gender-based Harassment and Abuse (qualtrics.com)

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
CONTRA COSTA ELECTRIC, INC.’S NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN

U.S. Dist. Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case Nos. 19-30088 and 19-30089 (DM)

S:\ALRDOCS\30667\1\00229208.DOCX

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LEONIDOU & ROSIN

Professional Corporation

A. Robert Rosin (SBN 115245)

arrosin@alr-law.com

Gregory S. Gerson (SBN 318795)

ggerson@alr-law.com

777 Cuesta Drive, Suite 200

Mountain View, CA 94040

Telephone: (650) 691-2888

Attorneys for Creditor

CONTRA COSTA ELECTRIC, INC.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

CONTRA COSTA ELECTRIC, INC.’S

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN

(11 USC §§ 546 and 362)

TO THE CLERK OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, THE DEBTORS, AND ALL OTHER 

INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

You are hereby notified that Contra Costa Electric, Inc. (hereinafter “CCE”) hereby 

perfects and continues to perfect, under 11 United States Code Sections 546(b) and 362(b)(3), its 

mechanic’s lien in the principal amount, after deducting all credits and offsets, of $202,628.80, 

for labor, equipment, material, and services provided by CCE, generally described as electrical 

construction work including switch replacement, incorporated in and constituting improvements 

to the real property commonly known as 246 Elm Avenue, Manteca, California 95336. The 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2314 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 14:36:03 Page 1 of

2
CONTRA COSTA ELECTRIC, INC.’S NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN

U.S. Dist. Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case Nos. 19-30088 and 19-30089 (DM)

S:\ALRDOCS\30667\1\00229208.DOCX

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

purported owner of the property in question is Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (hereinafter, "PGE"), 

6030 West Oaks Boulevard, Suite 300, Rocklin, California 95765. CCE furnished the abovedescribed labor, equipment, materials and services at the special instance and request of, and 

pursuant to a contract with, PGE. This Notice constitutes the legal equivalent of having recorded 

a mechanic's lien and then having commenced a suit to foreclose upon the mechanic’s lien. 

The amount set forth in this Notice is for work performed on or before the 

commencement of this bankruptcy proceeding; amounts owed for post-bankruptcy work are not 

included. CCE reserves all of its rights and remedies as to amounts owed for post-bankruptcy 

work.

You are further notified that CCE intends to enforce the lien to the fullest extent allowed 

by bankruptcy law and California law. This pleading does not constitute an admission as to the 

necessity of any such seizure or commencement.

Dated: May 31, 2019 LEONIDOU & ROSIN

Professional Corporation

By__________/s/ A. Robert Rosin_____________

 A. Robert Rosin

 Attorneys for 

Contra Costa Electric, Inc. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2314 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 14:36:03 Page 2 of

2
warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 

840, 844 (2004). 

Having considered the parties' arguments, we conclude that 

our intervention is warranted. Id. Specifically, an order dismissing the 

underlying case was entered in July 2012. This order constituted a final 

judgment, as it effectively resolved all the parties' claims. Lee v. GNLV 

Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000). "[O]nce a final judgment is 

entered, the district court lacks jurisdiction to reopen it, absent a proper 

and timely motion under the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure." SFPP, 

L.P. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 608, 612, 173 P.3d 715, 717 

(2007). Thus, if real party in interest wanted to challenge the July 2012 

dismissal order, such a challenge needed to be made in conformity with 

the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure. Because her August 2013 "Motion to 

Re-Open Case" failed in this regard, the district court lacked jurisdiction 

to grant the motion. Id.; see NRCP 60(b) (providing generally that a party 

must file a motion for relief from judgment within six months from when 

written notice of entry of the order is served on that party). 2 

As any further proceedings before the district court in this 

matter would be in excess of the district court's jurisdiction, our 

intervention is warranted. SFPP, L.P., 123 Nev. at 612, 173 P.3d at 718; 

Greene, 115 Nev. at 396, 990 P.2d at 187. Accordingly, we 

2Real party in interest does not dispute that she received notice of 

entry of the July 2012 dismissal order. Nor does she dispute receiving 

notice of the other post-dismissal filings in this matter, including 

petitioner's October 2012 "Request For Trial De Novo." Real party in 

interest suggests that this filing demonstrates that both sides were under 

the mistaken belief that the case had not been dismissed. A review of this 

filing demonstrates that real party in interest's suggestion is meritless. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 
ORDER the petition GRANTED AND DIRECT THE CLERK 

OF THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF PROHIBITION directing the 

district court to vacate its October 4, 2013, order and precluding the 

district court from conducting any further proceedings in District Court 

Case No. A631056. 

Pickering 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge 

Law Offices of David M. Jones/Las Vegas 

Gazda & Tadayon 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 3 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A )(ZIW
#### Thomas D. Morrissey and Harriet L. Morrissey, appellants, v. St. Paul Property and Casualty Insurance Co., appellee.

471 N.W.2d 733

Filed July 5, 1991.

No. 89-400.

Rollin R. Bailey, of Bailey, Polsky, Cada, Cope & Wood, for appellants.

Shirley K. Williams, of Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, for appellee.

Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we find that a question exists as to a material fact or the inference to be drawn therefrom, and accordingly the defendant was not entitled to summary judgment. The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for

further proceedings.