29568 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices 

respondent to complete the survey the 

total burden is 9,600 respondents x 5 

minutes = 48,000 minutes, or 800 hours 

per year. 

Title: Aviation Security Customer 

Satisfaction Performance Measurement 

Passenger Survey. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

OMB Control Number: 1652–0013. 

Forms(s): Aviation Security Customer 

Satisfaction Performance Measurement 

Passenger Survey. 

Affected Public: Airline Travelers. 

Abstract: This airport survey 

represents an important part of TSA’s 

efforts to collect data on customer 

satisfaction with TSA’s aviation security 

procedures. 

Number of Respondents: 9,600. 

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An 

estimated 800 hours annually. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on May 20, 

2010. 

Joanna Johnson, 

TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office 

of Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12603 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

Extension of Agency Information 

Collection Activity Under OMB Review: 

Aircraft Operator Security 

AGENCY: Transportation Security 

Administration, DHS. 

ACTION: 30-day notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces that 

the Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA) has forwarded the 

Information Collection Request (ICR), 

OMB control number 1652–0003, 

abstracted below to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval of an extension of 

the currently approved collection under 

the Paperwork Reduction Act. The ICR 

describes the nature of the information 

collection and its expected burden. TSA 

published a Federal Register notice, 

with a 60-day comment period soliciting 

comments, of the following collection of 

information on March 16, 2010. 75 FR 

12559. The collection requires aircraft 

operators to adopt and implement a 

TSA-approved security program. These 

programs require aircraft operators to 

maintain and update records to ensure 

compliance with security provisions 

outlined in 49 CFR part 1544. 

DATES: Send your comments by June 25, 

2010. A comment to OMB is most 

effective if OMB receives it within 30 

days of publication. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments on 

the proposed information collection to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget. Comments should be addressed 

to Desk Officer, Department of 

Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via 

electronic mail to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed 

to (202) 395–6974. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joanna Johnson, TSA Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) Officer, Office of 

Information Technology (OIT), TSA–11, 

Transportation Security Administration, 

601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 

20598–6011; telephone (571) 227–3651; 

e-mail TSAPRA@dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The ICR documentation is 

available at http://www.reginfo.gov. 

Therefore, in preparation for OMB 

review and approval of the following 

information collection, TSA is soliciting 

comments to— 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 

the proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including using 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Information Collection Requirement 

1652–0003; Security Programs for 

Aircraft Operators, 49 CFR part 1544. 

TSA is seeking to renew its OMB 

control number, 1652–0003, Aircraft 

Operator Security. TSA uses the 

information collected to determine 

compliance with 49 CFR part 1544 and 

to ensure the freedom of movement for 

people and commerce by monitoring 

aircraft operator security procedures. 

TSA has implemented aircraft operator 

security standards at 49 CFR part 1544 

to require all aircraft operators to which 

this part applies to adopt and 

implement a security program. These 

TSA-approved security programs 

establish procedures that aircraft 

operators must carry out to protect 

persons and property traveling on 

flights provided by the aircraft operator 

against acts of criminal violence, aircraft 

piracy, and the introduction of 

explosives, incendiaries, or weapons 

aboard an aircraft. 

This information collection is 

mandatory for aircraft operators. As part 

of their security programs, affected 

aircraft operators are required to 

maintain and update, as necessary, 

records of compliance with the security 

program provisions set forth in 49 CFR 

part 1544, including compliance with 

applicable Security Directives. This 

regulation also requires affected aircraft 

operators to make their security 

programs and associated records 

available for inspection and copying by 

TSA to ensure transportation security 

and regulatory compliance. 

The information TSA collects 

includes identifying information on 

aircraft operators’ flight crews and 

passengers. The requirement 

encompasses vetting of the entire flight 

crew, other aircraft operator personnel, 

and all passengers. The passenger watch 

list checks currently conducted by 

aircraft operators will soon be taken 

over by TSA’s Secure Flight program. 

Under this program, TSA will conduct 

the checks for the aircraft operators, 

which will reduce their burden as 

described in this ICR. (See OMB control 

number 1652–0046). 

Aircraft operators are required to 

provide this information via electronic 

means. Aircraft operators with limited 

electronic systems may need to modify 

their current systems or generate a new 

computer system in order to submit the 

requested information but are not 

restricted to these means. 

Part 1544 also requires aircraft 

operators to ensure that flight crew 

members and employees with 

unescorted access authority or who 

perform screening, checked baggage, or 

cargo functions submit to and receive a 

criminal history records check (CHRC). 

As part of the CHRC process, the 

individual must provide identifying 

information, including fingerprints. 

Additionally, aircraft operators must 

maintain these records and make them 

available to TSA for inspection and 

copying upon request. 

Part 1544 also governs recordkeeping 

requirements for aircraft operators 

holding a full All-Cargo Standard 

Security Program; however, their hour 

burden has been separately reported 

under OMB control number 1652–0040. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices 29569 

Title: Aircraft Operator Security. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

OMB Control Number: 1652–0003. 

Forms(s): N/A. 

Affected Public: Aircraft Operators. 

Abstract: 49 CFR part 1544 requires 

aircraft operators to maintain, update, 

and comply with TSA-approved 

comprehensive security programs to 

ensure the freedom of movement for 

people and commerce by monitoring 

aircraft operator security procedures. 

These programs and related records are 

subject to TSA inspection. 

Number of Respondents: 796. 

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An 

estimated 1,841,130 hours annually. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia on May 20, 

2010. 

Joanna Johnson, 

TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office 

of Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12609 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0262] 

Certificate of Alternative Compliance 

for the Offshore Supply Vessel 

JANSON R. GRAHAM 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces 

that a Certificate of Alternative 

Compliance was issued for the offshore 

supply vessel JANSON R. GRAHAM as 

required by 33 U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33 

CFR 81.18. 

DATES: The Certificate of Alternative 

Compliance was issued on March 31, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this notice is 

available for inspection or copying at 

the Docket Management Facility (M–30), 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. You may also 

find this docket on the Internet by going 

to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting 

USCG–2010–0262 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, call 

LTJG Christine Dimitroff, District Eight, 

Prevention Branch, U.S. Coast Guard, 

telephone 504–671–2176. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background and Purpose 

A Certificate of Alternative 

Compliance, as allowed under Title 33, 

Code of Federal Regulation, Parts 81 and 

89, has been issued for the offshore 

supply vessel JANSON R. GRAHAM, 

O.N. 1222117. Full compliance with 72 

COLREGS and Inland Rules Act would 

hinder the vessel’s ability to maneuver 

within close proximity of offshore 

platforms. The forward masthead light 

may be located on the top forward 

portion of the pilothouse 6.2 meters 

above the hull. Placing the forward 

masthead light at the height required by 

Annex I, paragraph 2(a) of the 72 

COLREGS and Annex I, Section 84.03(a) 

of the Inland rules Act would result in 

a masthead light location highly 

susceptible to damage when working in 

close proximity to offshore platforms. 

Additionally, the horizontal distance 

between the forward and aft masthead 

lights may be 2.489 meters. Placing the 

aft masthead light at the horizontal 

distance from the forward masthead 

light as required by Annex I, paragraph 

3(a) of the 72 COLREGS and Annex I, 

Section 84.05(a) of the Inland Rules Act 

would result in an aft masthead light 

location directly over the aft cargo deck 

where it would interfere with loading 

and unloading operations. 

The Certificate of Alternative 

Compliance allows for the vertical 

placement of the forward masthead light 

to deviate from requirements set forth in 

Annex I, paragraph 2(a) of 72 COLREGS 

and Annex I, Section 84.03(a) of the 

Inland Rules Act. In addition the 

Certificate of Alternative Compliance 

allows for the horizontal separation of 

the forward and aft masthead lights to 

deviate from the requirements of Annex 

I, paragraph 3(a) of 72 COLREGS and 

Annex I, Section 84.05(a) of the Inland 

Rules Act. 

Dated: 15 April 2010. 

J. W. Johnson, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Chief, 

Inspections and Investigations Branch By 

Direction of the Commander Eighth Coast 

Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12602 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0031] 

Recovery Policy RP9526.1, Hazard 

Mitigation Funding Under Section 406 

(Stafford Act) 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: This document provides 

notice of the final Recovery Policy 

RP9526.1, Hazard Mitigation Funding 

Under Section 406 (Stafford Act), which 

is being issued by the Federal 

Emergency Management Agency 

(FEMA). 

DATES: This policy is effective March 30, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: This final policy is available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov 

under docket ID FEMA–2010–0031 and 

on FEMA’s Web site at http:// 

www.fema.gov. You may also view a 

hard copy of the final policy at the 

Office of Chief Counsel, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, Room 

835, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20472–3100. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lu 

Juana Richardson, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20472, via e-mail at 

LuJuana.Richardson@dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

policy provides guidance on the 

appropriate use of hazard mitigation 

discretionary funding available under 

Section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford 

Disaster Relief and Emergency 

Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 

5172. This will ensure national 

consistency in the use of Section 406 

mitigation funds and promote measures 

that reduce future loss to life and 

property, protect the Federal investment 

in public infrastructure and ultimately 

help build disaster-resistant 

communities. 

FEMA has revised this policy to 

reflect the alignment of benefit cost 

analysis methodologies between the 

Mitigation and Recovery Directorates. In 

order to achieve consistency across 

program areas and to maximize FEMA’s 

ability to support and encourage costeffective hazard mitigation, the Public 

Assistance Division has adopted the 

Mitigation Directorate’s Benefit Cost 

Analysis (BCA) methodology for Section 

406 hazard mitigation projects. 

Previously, the only benefits considered 

in the BCA were damage to the facility 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1