alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, David
M. Morse, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  November
      27, 2009
                        By:
                        /s/ David
      M. MorseName:
      David M. Morse
                            Title:
      Co-President and Chief Executive Officer
 I,
Desiree Mejia, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Location Based Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  November
      27, 2009
                          By:
                          /s/ Desiree
      MejiaName:
      Desiree Mejia
                              Title:
      Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial Officer




Signed
originals of these written statements required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.




These
certifications accompany the Form 10-K to which they relate, are not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
this Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Final Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition 
to the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the decision 
to designate a class of employees from the Nevada Test Site as an 
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy 
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On 
April 5, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary 
of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to 
the SEC:

    All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor 
agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked at the 
Nevada Test Site, from January 1, 1963 through December 31, 1992, 
for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, 
occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with 
work days within the parameters established for one or more other 
classes of employees in the SEC.

    This designation became effective on May 5, 2010, as provided for 
under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on May 5, 2010, members 
of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became 
members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia 
Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f3b3c3e2c3f3c3b3c51383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="76323537253635323558313920">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-11880 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12926]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Tuolumne-Mariposa Counties Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Tuolumne-Mariposa Counties Resource Advisory Committee 
will meet on June 14, 2010, at the City of Sonora Fire Department, in 
Sonora, California. The purpose of the meeting is to hear presentations 
made by project proponents requesting RAC funding.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 14, 2010, from 12 p.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the City of Sonora Fire 
Department located at 201 South Shepherd Street, in Sonora, California 
(CA 95370).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth Martinez, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Stanislaus National Forest, 19777 Greenley Road, Sonora, CA 95370 
(209) 532-3671, extension 320; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcbeb9a8b4b1bdaea8b5b2b9a69cbaaff2bab9b8f2a9af"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="492b2c3d2124283b3d20272c33092f3a672f2c2d673c3a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Presentation of primarily Forest Service project submittals by project 
proponents; (2) Public comment on meeting proceedings. This meeting is 
open to the public.

    Dated: May 1, 2010.
Susan Skalski,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-12926 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-ED-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 34.7

[ERNST & YOUNG LOGO]   Ernst & Young LLP                   Phone: (612) 343-1000
                       220 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400   www.ey.com
                       Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S.
Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i),
1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(i) through 1122 (d)(2)(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i)
through 1122 (d)(3)(iv), and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xv), which the
Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them
with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the
Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected
transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                        ----------------------------------------

February 26, 2007

                   A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Ninth Meeting: Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79: 
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79: 
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79: Enhanced 
Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

DATES: The meeting will be held June 15-16, 2010. from 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. 
(0830-1700).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the RTCA Headquarters, 1828 L 
Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036, 202-833-9339.
    Objective: Objective is completion of comment disposition from 
Final Review and Comment (FRAC) period of draft MASPS for EFVS approach 
and landing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for a Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79: 
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS) 
meeting. The agenda will include:

Tuesday, 15 June

    <bullet> Plenary (0830-1700, including breaks and lunch).
    <bullet> Review comments.
    <bullet> Topic: Enhanced Flight Vision.

Wednesday, 16 June

    <bullet> Plenary (0900-1700, including breaks and lunch).
    <bullet> Review comments.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' section. Members of the public 
may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 17, 2010.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-12359 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     Exhibit 8.1





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             TOTAL PAID-IN
                                                         JURISDICTION OF    CAPITAL OF SUCH     DIRECT EQUITY
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                  MAIN BUSINESS        INCORPORATION          ENTITY            INTEREST
------------------                  -------------        ---------------     ---------------    ------------
<S>                                 <C>                  <C>                  <C>                <C>

Hui Ying Investment, Ltd.             Investment         Taiwan, ROC          NT$500,000,000        100%

Joytech Co., Ltd.                     Systems Solutions  Taiwan, ROC          NT$18,500,000        92.5%
Macronix America, Inc.                Sales and          California, USA      US$100,000            100%
                                      marketing
Macronix Europe N.V.                  Sales and          Belgium              EUR 62,000            100%
                                      marketing
Macronix (B.V.I.) Co., Ltd.           Investment         British Virgin       US$138,647,126        100%
                                                         Islands
New Trend Technology Inc.             IC design          California, USA      US$23,000,000         100%
Wedgewood International Ltd.          Investment         British Virgin       US$15,010,000         100%
                                                         Islands
Macronix Pte Ltd.                     Sales and          Singapore            US$100,000            100%
                                      marketing
Kang Bao Investment Inc.              Investment         Taiwan, ROC          NT$500,000,000        100%
Rui Hong Investment Inc.              Investment         Taiwan, ROC          NT$500,000,000        100%
Magic Pixel Inc.                      IC design          Taiwan, ROC          NT$50,000,000         100%
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice. 

Robert Wayne Edwards Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Schedule Nos: 1033407 and 3.3138

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089) 

Schedule Amount: $16,149.00 

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________ Date: June 7, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2444 Filed: 06/07/19 Entered: 06/07/19 08:04:24 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2444 Filed: 06/07/19 Entered: 06/07/19 08:04:24 Page 2 of

2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2016

s0418 

# Order

Clerk May 2, 2016

151548

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151548

COA: 325057

Genesee CC: 89

- 041659

- FC

THOMAS JANARVIS ARMSTRONG

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12

, 2015 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Genesee Circuit Court on the

defendant’s first

- degree murder conviction, and we REMAND this case to the tr ial court

for resentencing on that conviction pursuant to MCL 769.25 and MCL 769.25a. See

Montgomery v Louisiana , 577 US ___; 136 S Ct 718; 193 L Ed 2d 599 (2016); Miller v

Alabama , 567 US ___; 132 S Ct 2455; 183 L Ed 2d 407 (2012).

We do not retain jur isdiction.
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-7 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofNovember 22, 2022, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-7 and Citibank, N.A. (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has beenmade under my supervision. 

 
2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
By: /s/ Randy BockenstedtName: Randy BockenstedtTitle: Senior Vice President, CollectionsDate: March 29, 2024By: /s/ Jonathan WatsonName: Jonathan WatsonTitle: Executive Vice President, TreasurerDate: March 29, 2024**
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Cytta Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Gosine, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 1st day of December, 2008.  /s/Robert Gosine_ Robert Gosine Chief Executive and Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6189
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRY CHARLIE SALTZ, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-64-P, CA-95-430-3-P) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Charlie Saltz, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to provide a transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 1025 (1992). Moreover, Appellant has failed to state a substantial claim justifying preparation ofa transcript at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). Consequently, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139252

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139252 COA: 291417 Wayne CC: 08-000010-FC TONY W. ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 4, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2553 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 16:06:54 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2553 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 16:06:54 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2553 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 16:06:54 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2553 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 16:06:54 Page 4 of

4
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-18-00324-CV

_________________

IN RE TIMOTHY D. STOVALL

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-10-12611

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this mandamus proceeding, Timothy D. Stovall asks this Court to compel 

the trial court (1) to vacate a June 26, 2018 order granting Crown Packaging 

Corporation’s motion to compel arbitration and abating the state court proceeding, 

and (2) to sign an order denying the motion to compel arbitration. Stovall requests a 

stay of the trial court’s June 26, 2018 order pending resolution of this mandamus 

proceeding. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a).

To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal.
2

In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Having reviewed the mandamus petition and record, we conclude that Stovall has 

not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the motion 

for temporary relief and the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 

52.8(a). 

PETITION DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 29, 2018

Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.