alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6021

JOSHUA SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN; JON P. GALLEY; H. B. MURPHY; LANCASTER,

Lieutenant; FRANK E. BISHOP, Lieutenant, Housing

Unit #2 Manager; HAWKINS, Doctor; MR. LILER; C.

E. JONES; CLASSIFICATION SUPERVISOR, MRDCC; N.

BROWN, Headquarters Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

L. GORDEN, Chief of Security; JAMES E. TICHNELL,

CMM, Case Manager Supervisor; S. HELMICK,

CCMSII; J. NINES, CCMSII, Case Manager; R. S.

RODRICK; J. SHREVES, Lieutenant, Housing Unit #4

Manager; TOMMY RIGGLEMAN, Lieutenant, Acting

Unit #4 Manager; J. HENDERSHOT, Doctor,

Psycology; EHLERS, Doctor; R. WILLS, COII,

Institutional Coordinator; C. KOCH, Headquarters

Coordinator; JACK KAVANAGH, Deputy Commissioner;

WILLIAM SONDERVAN, Commissioner; STUART O.

SIMMS, Secretary,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-02-4123-1-WDQ)

Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 31, 2005
- 2 -

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Smith, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Smith appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Smith’s motion to protect

his appeal from default, deny Smith’s motion to appoint counsel and

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v.

Warden, No. CA-02-4123-1-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7297

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JIMMY O’NEAL BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (CR-98-189; CA-01-410-5)

Submitted: May 31, 2005 Decided: June 28, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy O’Neal Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Harvard Spencer,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia;

Miller A. Bushong, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley,

West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy O’Neal Brown appeals from the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

district court denied relief following the recommendation of the

magistrate judge. Although we express no opinion regarding the

merits of Brown’s § 2255 motion, we grant a certificate of

appealability, vacate the district court’s order, and remand for

further proceedings.

The magistrate judge’s recommendation was filed on

July 25, 2001. On August 13, Brown filed objections dated

August 6. The district court determined that the objections were

untimely and, thus, did not consider them in its order and did not

make a decision on the disputed issues de novo. We find that

Brown’s objections were timely filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a),

(e), 72(a); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (2000), the district court is

obligated to review de novo the portions of the magistrate judge’s

recommendation to which timely objections are filed. United

States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 93-94 (4th Cir. 1984). Because

Brown made timely objections to the magistrate judge’s

recommendation, the district court’s error was not harmless. See

Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47-48 (4th Cir. 1982).

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court’s
- 3 -

order and remand the matter for the district court to conduct the

required de novo review. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4838 

To redesignate the railroad station located at 2955 Market Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known as ‘‘30th Street Station’’, as the 

‘‘William H. Gray III 30th Street Station’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2014 

Mr. FATTAH (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. PERRY, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. 

MEEHAN, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. MARINO, Mr. 

BARLETTA, Mr. ROTHFUS, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. DENT, Mr. 

PITTS, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, and Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To redesignate the railroad station located at 2955 Market 

Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known 

as ‘‘30th Street Station’’, as the ‘‘William H. Gray III 

30th Street Station’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 The railroad station located at 2955 Market Street 

5 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known as ‘‘30th 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4838 IH

1 Street Station’’, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘William H. Gray III 30th Street Station’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the railroad 

6 station referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a 

7 reference to the ‘‘William H. Gray III 30th Street Sta8 tion’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4710 

To amend the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Program to include all lands 

owned by the United States Government that are under the jurisdiction 

of the Department of Defense within the definition of entitlement lands 

for which payments are made, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2014 

Mrs. NEGRETE MCLEOD (for herself and Mr. COOK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Program to include 

all lands owned by the United States Government that 

are under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense 

within the definition of entitlement lands for which payments are made, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4710 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF ALL FEDERAL LANDS UNDER 

2 THE JURISDICTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 

3 DEFENSE WITHIN THE PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF 

4 TAXES PROGRAM. 

5 Section 6901(1) of title 31, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the 

7 following new subparagraph (D): 

8 ‘‘(D) that is under the jurisdiction of the 

9 Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a mili10 tary department;’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2
RESONANT INC.
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
2014 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Resonant Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of June 7, 2016, by action of the Board of Directors of Resonant Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).
1.    Section 3.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“(a)    Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12.2, a total of 2,700,000 Shares shall be authorized for grant under the Plan (the “Maximum Plan Shares”).  Any Shares that are subject to Awards shall be counted against this limit as one (1) Share for every one (1) Share granted.”
I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on March 22, 2016, and approved by the stockholders of the Company at a meeting held on June 7, 2016.
Executed as of June 7, 2016    
	
		
	RESONANT INC.

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Terry Lingren

	Name:
	Terry Lingren

	Its:
	Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice. 

R2Integrated_________________ Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee 

Schedule No: 1031772 & 3.2983 

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089) 

Schedule Amount: $92,341.00 

Name and Address where notices and 

payments to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________ Date: May 28, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2236 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 13:14:10 Page 1 of

2
 (SCHEDULE #: 1031772 & 3.2983)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2236 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 13:14:10 Page 2 of

2
ex10-39.htm


    Exhibit
10.39


     

     

    April
30, 2009

    ONE
YEAR TERM EXTENSION TO THE

    EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT OF AUGUST 1, 2004

    


    By and
between Siberian Energy Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and
Elena Pochapski (“Employee”) entered into this 30th day of
April 2009, and made effective as of January 1, 2009.

    


    WHEREAS the Company and the
Employee previously signed the Employment Agreement, which stated the term of
employment to start on September 1, 2003 and to end on December 31, 2008 (the
“Agreement”, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
A);

    


    AND WHEREAS the Company and
the Employee wish to further extend the term of the employment
agreement.

    


    NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT
WITNESSETH, that the Company and the Employee agree as
follows:

    


    Point 4 “Term” of the
employment Agreement to be revised and the term of the Agreement to be extended
until December 31, 2009 (the “Extended Term”).

    


    Point 5.1
“Compensation” of the employment Agreement to be revised and annual
salary of the Employee to be stated as US$75,000.

    


    Point 6 “Stock
Option” of the employment Agreement is to be removed and a new Stock
Option agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit B, is to be
entered into between the Company and the Employee.

    


    All other
provisions of the Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2003 shall remain in
full force and effect until the expiration of the Extended Term.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.

    


    


    
      	
              EMPLOYEE

            	
              COMPANY

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	/s/
      Elena Pochapski	/s/
      David Zaikin
	
              Elena
      Pochapski,

            	
              David
      Zaikin,

            
	
              Address: XXX XXXXXX
      XXXXX,

            	
              Chairman
      and CEO

            
	
              XXXXXXXXX,
      XX, XXX XXX

            	
              Siberian
      Energy Group Inc.

            
	
              XXXXXX
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                51,128
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         30,936
<ALLOWANCES>                           2,645
<INVENTORY>                            9,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      94,104
<PP&E>                                55,464
<DEPRECIATION>                        14,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       142,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 46,638
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              51,953
<OTHER-SE>                            30,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         142,304
<SALES>                              229,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     230,257
<CGS>                                155,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        193,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       37,804
<INCOME-TAX>                          11,977
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   25,827
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          25,827
<EPS-BASIC>                           1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                           1.58



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-72,773]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on January 7, 2010, applicable to workers of Clark Engineering Co., Inc., including on-site leased workers of Kelly Services, Owosso, Michigan. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7036).                

At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of metal parts.

The company reports that workers leased from Qualified Staffing were employed on-site at the Owosso, Michigan location of Clark Engineering Co., Inc. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Qualified Staffing working on-site at the Owosso, Michigan location of Clark Engineering Co., Inc.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,773 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Clark Engineering Co., Inc., including on-site leased workers of Kelly Services and Qualified Staffing, Owosso, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 14, 2008, through January 7, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of May, 2010.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-12109 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4910 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4910

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the authority of 
   the Internal Revenue Service to require truncated social security 
              numbers on Form W-2 wage and tax statements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2014

  Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Levin, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Danny K. 
    Davis of Illinois, Ms. Norton, Mr. Langevin, Ms. Schwartz, Ms. 
 Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Lewis, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. 
 Reed, Mr. Paulsen, Mr. Griffin of Arkansas, Mr. Gerlach, Ms. Linda T. 
 Sanchez of California, Mr. Nugent, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Enyart, Mr. Larson 
of Connecticut, and Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the authority of 
   the Internal Revenue Service to require truncated social security 
              numbers on Form W-2 wage and tax statements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Identity Protection Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF IRS AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE TRUNCATED SOCIAL SECURITY 
              NUMBERS ON FORM W-2.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 6051(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``his social security 
account number'' and inserting ``an identifying number for the 
employee''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Employment

**

----

| Learn about Federal Government job openings, internships, and fellowships. To find additional information about Federal Government job openings, visit the Office of Personnel Management on USAJOBS.
Senate Employment Office   about
-  Resume Bank 
-  Senate Employment Bulletin 
-  Internship Opportunities Bulletin 
-  https://employment.senate.gov/ 

Sergeant at Arms   about
**To review open positions please click on the link below:**-  Employment Opportunities 

Secretary of the Senate   about
**To review open positions please click on the link below:**-  Employment Opportunities |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

        -  Contact 
        -  Content Responsibility 
        -  Usage Policy 
        -  Privacy Policy 
        -  Employment & Internship 
        -            -  Senate Employment Office 
          -  Sergeant at Arms 
          -  Secretary of the Senate 
        -  Procurement
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 258 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 15:02:21 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 258 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 15:02:21 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 258 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 15:02:21 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 21
The following is a list of wholly owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise noted, of
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2000:


NAME OF  SUBSIDIARY                              STATE OF INCORPORATION

Florida Physicians Insurance Company, Inc. (FPIC)    Florida

Anesthesiologists' Professional Assurance Company    Florida

FPIC Insurance Agency, Inc.                          Florida

McCreary Corporation                                 Florida

Employers Mutual, Inc.                               Florida

FPIC Services, Inc.                                  Florida

Professional Strategy Options, Inc.                  Florida

Administrators For The Professions, Inc. (AFP)       New York

Group Data Corporation                               New York
(100% owned by AFP)

FPIC Intermediaries, Inc.                            New York
(100% owned by AFP)

The Tenere Group, Inc. (Tenere)                      Missouri
(100% owned by FPIC)

Intermed Insurance Company (Intermed)                Missouri
(100% owned by Tenere)

Trout Insurance Services, Inc.                       Missouri
(100% owned by Intermed)

Interlex Insurance Company                           Missouri
(100% owned by Intermed)

Insurance Services, Inc.                             Missouri
(100% owned by Intermed)