alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12399]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service

RIN 0572-ZA01


Broadband Initiatives Program

AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, Department of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of Extension of filing Public Notice Requests on Pending 
Round Two BIP Applications and of the Application Window for Request 
for Proposals.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to emergency maintenance issues on May 14, 2010, the Rural 
Utilities Service (RUS) is extending, by one day, the deadline for 
submitting Public Notice Requests (PNRs) on pending applications filed 
under Second Round Notice of Funds Availability (Second Round NOFA) for 
the Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP), published in the Federal 
Register at 75 FR 3820 (January 22, 2010). Such technical issues also 
affected the application window for satellite, rural library broadband, 
and technical assistance projects under BIP's Request for Proposals 
(RFP), published in the Federal Register at 75 FR 25185 (May 7, 2010). 
As a result, PNRs on pending Second Round NOFA applications must be 
filed by May 24, 2010, at 11:59 p.m. Central Time (CT); and 
applications for satellite, rural library broadband, and technical 
assistance projects must be postmarked by June 8, 2010.
    Contact Information: For general inquiries regarding BIP, contact 
David J. Villano, Assistant Administrator Telecommunications Program, 
Rural Utilities Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5c7ccd5e5d2c1c68bd0d6c1c48bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37555e4777405354194244535619505841">[email protected]</span></a>, telephone: (202) 690-0525.

    Dated: May 19, 2010.
Jessica Zufolo,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-12399 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Richard A. Springs v. Hanover National Bank.

Motion to resettle granted to extent stated in order.
Exhibit 10.1


 


FORM OF AMENDMENT NO. 1

2014 AND 2015 PERFORMANCE SHARES AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 1 to the 201X Performance
Shares Agreement (the “Grant Agreement”) entered into by and between Stoneridge, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”),
and __________ (“Grantee”), on March __, 201X, is dated June __, 2016.


 


The Company and the Grantee desire to amend
the Grant Agreement as follows.


 


The Grant Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting in its entirety the paragraph under Section 2, Special Provisions Applicable to Retirement, following part (3), and replacing
it with the following:


 


Only a Grantee who (i) is 63 or older on the date
of retirement, (ii) has provided written notice to the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”)
of the intent to retire at least 90 days prior to the retirement date, and (iii) has executed prior to retirement a customary one
year non-competition agreement shall be permitted to have his or her Performance Shares earned upon retirement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused
its corporate name to be subscribed by its duly authorized officer as of the day set forth above.


 





	 	STONERIDGE, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By	 	 
	 	 	Jonathan DeGaynor	 







 








	The foregoing is hereby accepted.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2065 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 11:24:58 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2065 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 11:24:58 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2065 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 11:24:58 Page 3 of

3
##### 



Exhibit 10.2




---



##### 



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Now, Therefore
 ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
  1.1 Board
 1.2 Cause
 (a) nolo contendere
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f)




---



##### 



1.3 Change in Control
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 1.4 Company
 1.5 Constructive Termination
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 2




---



##### 



1.6 Covered Termination
 1.7 Exchange Act
 1.8 Involuntary Termination Without Cause
 ARTICLE II
EMPLOYMENT BY THE COMPANY
 2.1 Position and Duties.
 2.2 Employment at Will.
 2.3 Employment Policies.
 2.4 Effective Date.
 3




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
 3.1 Base Salary.  Base Salary
 3.2 Annual Bonus. Annual Bonus
 3.3 Stock Options.  Code
 3.4 Vacation and Paid Time Off.
 3.5 Expenses.
 3.6 Standard Company Benefits.
 4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL BENEFITS
 4.1 Severance Benefits.
 4.2 Acceleration of Vesting of Option.
 4.3 Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
 4.4 Failure to Perform.
 5




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS
 5.1 Agreement. Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement
 5.2 Remedies.
 ARTICLE VI
OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES
 6.1 Other Activities.
 6.2 Competition/Investments.
 ARTICLE VII
NONINTERFERENCE
  6




---



##### 



ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
 8.1 Notices.
 8.2 Severability.
 8.3 Waiver.
 8.4 Complete Agreement.
 8.5 Counterparts.
 8.6 Headings.
 8.7 Successors and Assigns.
 7




---



##### 



8.8 Arbitration. JAMS provided, however,
 8.9 Attorneys Fees
 8.10 Choice of Law.
 Signature page follows
 8




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof
 OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.By:Gary D. Tollefson, M.D., Ph.D.CEO and President  [Employee]
 9
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-3(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank,N.A. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 29, 2024**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

44553.00001

Dennis F. Dunne (admitted pro hac vice) 

Samuel A. Khalil (admitted pro hac vice)

MILBANK LLP 

55 Hudson Yards 

New York, New York 10001-2163

Telephone: (212) 530-5000

Facsimile: (212) 530-5219

and 

Gregory A. Bray (SBN 115367)

Thomas R. Kreller (SBN 161922) 

MILBANK LLP 

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: (424) 386-4000

Facsimile: (213) 629-5063

Counsel for the Official Committee

of Unsecured Creditors

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors.

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

 Affects PG&E Corporation

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company

 Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case.

No. 19-30088 (DM)

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 

BETWEEN OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF 

UNSECURED CREDITORS AND UNITED 

STATES TRUSTEE EXTENDING TIME 

TO RESPOND TO APPLICATION TO 

RETAIN AND EMPLOY AXIOM 

ADVISORS AS GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS 

CONSULTANT TO THE COMMITTEE

[No Hearing Requested]

The Court having considered the Stipulation Between Official Committee of Unsecured 

Creditors and United States Trustee Extending Time to Respond to Application to Retain and 

Signed and Filed: May 1, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

May 01, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1796 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 18:22:03 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Employ Axiom Advisors as Government Affairs Consultant to the Committee (the “Stipulation”), 

entered into by the (i) Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”) appointed in 

the jointly administered chapter 11 cases of the above-captioned debtors in possession, on the one 

hand, and (ii) the Office of the United States Trustee (the “U.S. Trustee” and together with the 

Committee, the “Parties”), on the other hand, filed on May 1, 2019; and, pursuant to such 

Stipulation and agreement of the Parties, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The time for the U.S. Trustee to file and serve any response or opposition to the 

Axiom Application (as defined in the Stipulation) is extended through 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on 

May 3, 2019.

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 

Dated: May 1, 2019

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE

/s/ Marta E. Villacorta

Marta E. Villacorta

Trial Attorney 

Attorney for Andrew R. Vara, Acting United States 

Trustee for Region 31

**END OF ORDER**

 1 Andrew R. Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, is acting in this appointment 

for Tracy Hope Davis, United States Trustee for Region 17, who is recused from the abovecaptioned cases.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1796 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 18:22:03 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Process Technology Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), We, William A. Silvey, President and director and W. Scott Thompson,
Secretary of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: 7/15/2005                         /s/William A. Silvey, Jr.
      --------------                     ---------------------------
                                         William A. Silvey, Jr.
                                         President and Director


Dated: 7/15/2005                         /s/W. Scott Thompson
      --------------                     ---------------------------
                                         W. Scott Thompson
                                         Secretary and Director
#### James C. Stout v. Thomas Jones.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion hy

Haight, J.
#### W. B. NIXON v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE.

(Filed 2 July, 1930.)

(See *Reynolds v. Asheville, ante,*212, and *Penland v. Bryson City, ante,*140.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *MacBae, Special Judge,*at April Term, 1930, of BuNOOMbe.

Controversy without action submitted on an agreed statement of facts.

Judgment for defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals.

*218
      *R. M. ■Wells for plaintiff.*

*George Pennell, Charles N. Malone and Charles E. Jones for defendants.*

Stacy, O. J.

This is a companion case, with a contrary decision in the court below, to *Reynolds .v. Asheville, ante,*212, and is controlled by what was said in that case, the fact situations in the two cases being sufficiently similar to present no question of legal difference. Primarily, both cases involve the same principles of law.

There is this additional question: Plaintiff seeks to challenge the validity of the City Extension Act as not having been passed by the Legislature in the manner provided by Article II, section 14, of the State Constitution. That such is not necessary was decided in *Lutterloh v. Fayetteville,*149 N. C., 65, 62 S. E., 758, and *Penland v. Bryson*City, *ante,*140. But relieving the plaintiff of the tax would seem to take from him the right to insist on a determination of the constitutionality of the act.

Error.

ClaeksoN, J., dissents.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Dale W. Hilpert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Footstar, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: April 8, 2005

/s/ Dale W. Hilpert

Dale W. Hilpert
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2291

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Gary Franklin Albin, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 3, 2008 Filed: November 6, 2008

___________ Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gary Franklin Albin appeals the district court’s 1 judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). He ch allenges the sufficien cy of the evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
At trial, Wadena County Assistant Deputy Sheriff David Shaw testified that, while Shaw was attempting to arrest Al bin on an outstanding warrant, Albin pointed a gun at him and refused to drop it. Shaw then shot Albin, hitting him in the leg, and-2- retreated to wait for backup help; he la ter retrieved a Ruge r .22 revolver from underneath the front of Albin’s nearby vehicle. The parties stipulated that the gun had traveled in interstate commerce and that Al bin was a convicted felon. The jury found him guilty, and the court sentenced him to 220 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release.
A defendant generally waives his right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, other than for plain error, where, as here, he fails to move for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the prosecution’s case and at the close of all evidence, see United States v. Jordan , No. 07-5696, 2008 WL 4568135, at *13 (6th Cir. Oct. 15, 2008); United States v. Wadena , 152 F.3d 831, 853 (8th Cir. 1998), but the government does not raise the issue of waiver, seeUnited States v. Buchmeier , 255 F.3d 415, 419 (7th Cir. 2001) (although defendant failed to move for judgment of acquittal and thereby waived challenge to sufficiency of evidence, government chose to argue evidence was sufficient and ther eby “waived [defendant’s] waiver”); cf. Greenlaw v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 2559, 2564 (2008) (c ourts rely on parties to frame issues for discussion).
Regardless whether we review for plain error, or apply the standard used in cases where the challenge was preserved, United States v. Shepherd , 284 F.3d 965, 969 (8th Cir. 2002) (evidence is viewed in light most favorable to verdict, and is sufficient if any rational trier of fact c ould have found essential elements of crime beyond reasonable doubt), the evidence amply supports Albin’s felon-in-possession conviction, see United States v. Echols , 144 F.3d 584, 585 (8th Cir. 1998) (government has burden of pr oving defendant was convictedof felony and thereafter possessed firearm, and firearm traveled in or affected interstate commerce; credibility of officers’ testimony was matter to be resolved by jury).
Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 236 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 13:40:43 Page 1 of 1
----

| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/  KURT      H. JENSEN |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Kurt      H. Jensen                |   |
|   |   | Chief      Financial Officer       |   |
|   |   | August      14, 2008               |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7060

DONNELL HURT,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RICHARD TRODDEN, Commonwealth Attorney for Arlington 

County; WILLIAM WETZONIS, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney 

for Arlington County; ARLINGTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; 

HARRY DENNIS, Attorney at Law and an agent of the 

Commonwealth of Virginia,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:11-cv-00625-LO-JFA)

Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 30, 2011

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnell Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donnell Hurt appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. 

Trodden, No. 1:11-cv-00625-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. July 13, 2011). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2021-14 Filed: 05/15/19 Entered: 05/15/19 15:59:18 Page 1of 1