95th Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 95-368

VETO OF

SIKES ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1978

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

VETOING

H R. 10882, AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS TO CARRY

OUT CONSERVATION PROGRAMS ON MILITARY RESERVATIONS

AND PUBLIC LANDS DURING FISCAL YEARS 1979, 1980, AND 1981

J u l y 11, 1978.— Message and accompanying act referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

and ordered to be printed

29-011 0

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 1978
To the Home of Representatives: I am returning without my approval H.R. 10882, the “Sikes Act Amendments of 1978.” The Sikes Act authorizes Federal-State cooperative programs for fish and wildlife conservation and public outdoor recreation on military reservations, National Forests, National Aeronautics and Space Administration sites, and certain Energy and Interior Department lands. It is intended to foster cooperation between the States and Federal land management agencies. H.R. 10882 would extend and in­ crease appropriation authorizations under the Act through 1981. I am strongly committed to the wise management and conservation of fish and wildlife on public lands; I have recommended appropri­ ations of approximately $35 million for fish and wildlife management on public lands subject to the Sikes Act. This total includes nearly $14.4 million for Federal/State cooperative programs of the type authorized by that Act, programs I believe are valuable and important. However, these amendments are objectionable in two respects. First, the bill would more than double the current appropriation authoriza­ tions for Sikes Act programs—from $23.5 million in 1978 to $51 mil­ lion in 1979, and $61 million in 1980 and 1981. These funds would be in addition to authorizations under other, more general, land manage­ ment programs which are now used for carrying out most Sikes Act activities. I insist on adequate attention to the management of fish and wildlife resources on public lands, but the appropriations for these programs must be determined in the context of an effective and efficient management program encompassing all public land resources. These amendments provide unneeded authorization levels for Sikes Act programs. Second, and more importantly, I object to the requirement in H.R. 10882 that directs the Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Defense to report to congressional authorizing committees whenever the President’s budget request for Sikes Act activities is less than the amount authorized, and requires them to state specifically why the higher amount was not requested. This requirement is designed to bring pressure on the administration to seek separate additional funds for Sikes Act programs and invites agencies to undercut the Presi­ dent’s annual budget he has presented to the Congress. This is an unacceptable intrusion on the President’s obTgations and authority as Chief Executive. This approach would limit the President’s ability to make his annual budget recommendations a positive, comprehensive, and balanced statement of the Administration’s policies and budget priorities. Disapproval of H.R. 10882 will not affect planned Federal expendi­ tures for fish and wildlife management on public lands for 1979 which may be carried out under other more general land management author­ ities. This administration will continue to move vigorously ahead in cooperation with the States to implement programs for the conserva­ tion and enhancement of fish and wildlife on public lands.

Jim m y Carter.

T h e W h it e H ouse, July 10, 1978.