I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4897 

To require the Secretary of Education to complete a data analysis on the 

impact of the proposed rule on gainful employment prior to issuing 

a final rule on gainful employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2014 

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, 

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

TONKO, Mr. MCKEON, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. HUNTER, Ms. SINEMA, 

Mr. GARCIA, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SIRES, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. GRAYSON, and Mr. ROKITA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to complete a data 

analysis on the impact of the proposed rule on gainful 

employment prior to issuing a final rule on gainful employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in Edu5 cation Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4897 IH

1 SEC. 2. DATA ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT FOR FINAL RULE 

2 ON GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Education shall 

4 not issue a final rule or otherwise implement the proposed 

5 rule published by the Department of Education in the no6 tice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register on 

7 March 25, 2014 (79 Fed. Reg. 16426 et seq.), or any 

8 other proposed rule that amends parts 600 or 668 of title 

9 34, Code of Federal Regulations, with respect to gainful 

10 employment programs, until 90 days after— 

11 (1) the Secretary of Education publishes a com12 plete data analysis— 

13 (A) on the impact of such proposed rule 

14 (including the debt-to-earnings and pro15 grammatic cohort default rate measures) on all 

16 postsecondary education programs and students 

17 at all categories of institutions of higher edu18 cation that participate in a program under title 

19 IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.), including the impact on— 

21 (i) students who receive Federal Pell 

22 Grants under subpart 1 of part A of title 

23 IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

24 (20 U.S.C. 1070a); 

25 (ii) minority students; 

26 (iii) students over age 24; 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4897 IH

1 (iv) students who are veterans; 

2 (v) independent students; and 

3 (vi) dependent students; and 

4 (B) in a format similar to the Gainful Em5 ployment 2012 Informational Rate Calculations 

6 published by the Department of Education; and 

7 (2) the Comptroller General of the United 

8 States issues a report that reviews such data anal9 ysis for data accuracy and completeness. 

10 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

11 (1) INDEPENDENT STUDENT.—The term ‘‘inde12 pendent student’’ has the meaning given the term in 

13 section 480(d) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

14 (20 U.S.C. 1087vv(d)). 

15 (2) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—The 

16 term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the 

17 meaning given the term in section 102 of the Higher 

18 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002), except 

19 that the term does not include institutions described 

20 in subparagraph (C) of section 102(a)(1). 

21 (3) VETERAN.—The term ‘‘veteran’’ has the 

22 meaning given the term in section 480(c) of the 

23 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

24 1087vv(c)). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS