alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of  Operations  for the six months ended June 30, 1997 (Unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety  by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                 1,786
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       1,599
<PP&E>                                                38,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                        14,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        27,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1,414
<BONDS>                                               21,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                             5,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          27,825
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       3,701 
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         821
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           6.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           6.93
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

M. Ryan Pinkston (SBN 310971) 

rpinkston@seyfarth.com 

Christopher J. Harney (SBN 322306) 

charney@seyfarth.com 

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 397-2823 

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 

Attorneys for 

Turner Construction Company

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☒ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☐ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’S 

NOTICE OF PERFECTION OF LIEN 

PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2571 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:42:52 Page 1 of

7
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(b)(3) and 546(b), Turner Construction Company (“Turner”) hereby 

gives notice of its perfection of, maintenance and continuation of perfection of, and intention to enforce 

to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, see, e.g., California Civil Code § 8400 et seq., Turner’s 

duly recorded mechanic’s lien for labor, equipment, material, and services provided by Turner to Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company, as more fully described in the attached Exhibit A. See Village Nurseries v. 

Gould (In re Baldwin Builders), 232 B.R. 406 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1999); Village Nurseries v. Greenbaum, 

101 Cal. App. 4th 26 (2002). This notice is in addition to, and not in lieu of, Turner’s right and intention 

to enforce its lien to the fullest extent permitted by law. Turner reserves all rights. 

DATED: June 18, 2019 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By: /s/ M. Ryan Pinkston 

M. Ryan Pinkston 

 Christopher J. Harney 

Attorneys for Turner Construction Company

56430669v.1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2571 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:42:52 Page 2 of

7
EXHIBIT A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2571 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:42:52 Page 3 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2571 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:42:52 Page 4 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2571 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:42:52 Page 5 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2571 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:42:52 Page 6 of

7
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2571 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 11:42:52 Page 7 of

7
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS


         I, Charles C. Jacobs, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of First McMinnville Corporation;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.


May 11, 2005



/s/ Charles C. Jacobs
------------------------------------
Chairman and CEO
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1876 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 11:13:13 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1876 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 11:13:13 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 31.2

 

**Certification**

 

I, Mitchell T.G. Graye, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company (the “registrant”);

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.   disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

| /s/Mitchell T.G. Graye                            | Date:  | May 15, 2007 |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| Mitchell T.G. Graye, Executive Vice President and |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                           |   |
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4730 

To allow the return of personal property to victims of sexual assault incidents 

involving a member of the Armed Forces upon completion of proceedings 

related to the incident. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2014 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To allow the return of personal property to victims of sexual 

assault incidents involving a member of the Armed 

Forces upon completion of proceedings related to the 

incident. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4730 IH

1 SECTION 1. REVISION TO REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 

2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY ON RE3 TENTION OF EVIDENCE IN A SEXUAL AS4 SAULT CASE TO ALLOW RETURN OF PER5 SONAL PROPERTY UPON COMPLETION OF 

6 RELATED PROCEEDINGS. 

7 Section 586 of the National Defense Authorization 

8 Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 

9 1435; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following new subsection: 

11 ‘‘(f) RETURN OF PERSONAL PROPERTY UPON COM12 PLETION OF RELATED PROCEEDINGS.—Notwithstanding 

13 subsection (c)(4)(A), personal property retained as evi14 dence in connection with an incident of sexual assault in15 volving a member of the Armed Forces may be returned 

16 to the rightful owner of such property after the conclusion 

17 of all legal, adverse action, and administrative proceedings 

18 related to such incident.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ndsn-ex101_100.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

NORDSON CORPORATION

2005 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2005

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)

 

Whereas, Nordson Corporation (the "Company") sponsors and maintains the Nordson Corporation 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan Effective January 1, 2005 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) (the "Plan") for the benefit of certain officers and key employees of the Company who upon recommendation of the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company are approved for participation in the Plan by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion; and

WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan; 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective May 10, 2016, the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below.

I.

 

The last sentence of the second paragraph of Section 3.9(f) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

"Accordingly, the provisions of Section 4.1 shall not be applicable to any portion of the Participant's Account Balance allocated to the Nordson Stock Measurement Fund, nor shall the provisions of Section 8.1 of this Plan be applicable to any portion of the Participant's Account Balance allocated to the Nordson Stock Measurement Fund in the case of a Participant suffering a Disability prior to the date he is eligible to Retire."

 

II.

 

The last sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

 

"The payment of any amount under this Section 4.1 shall not be subject to the Deduction Limitation."

 

III.

 

Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 


	
 
	
"5.1
	
Retirement Benefit.  Subject to the Deduction Limitation, a Participant who retires shall receive, as a Retirement Benefit, his or her vested Balance."




 

 



 

IV.

 

The last two sentences of Section 5.2 of the Plan are hereby deleted and the following two sentences are substituted therefor:

"The lump sum payment shall be made, or installment payments shall commence, no later than 60 days after the date the Participant Retires.  Any payment made shall be subject to the Deduction Limitation."

 

V.

 

The last sentence of Section 5.5 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

 

"For purposes of this Section 5.5 and Section 7.4, Specified Employees shall be determined as of any date in accordance with the Nordson Corporation Policy for determining Specified Employees."

 

EXECUTED this 10th day of May, 2016.

 


	
NORDSON CORPORATION

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Title: Vice President, General Counsel

	
 
	
 
	
And Secretary
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-47,915-04

EX P ARTE RICHARD F ININEN, Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2015F 00270A IN THE 5 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM CASS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant filed this a

pplication for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler

k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. According to the rec ord, the trial court held an evidentiar y hear ing on Marc h 29, 2022, but the transcr ipt of the hear ing was not forwa

rded t o t h i s C o u rt
. Under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, a repor

ter is require d to transcr ibe a hear ing within fiftee n day s of its conclusion and then to immediately forwa

rd the transcr ipt to the district cler k in the county of conviction. Id

. at § 3(d). After rec eiving the transcr ipt, the district cler k is require d to forwa

rd it, among other things, to this Court. Id .; see also T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). The dist rict clerk s hall serve the reporter in Applicant’s case w i t h a copy of t his order and2

then either forwa

rd to this Court the transcr ipt of the evidentiar y hear ing or cer

tify in writing that the repor ter has not transcr ibed the hear ing. The district cler k shall comply with this order within thirty day s from the da

te of this order

.
Filed: Apr il 18, 2022 Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-50090

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

ZULMA PALMA-GOMEZ also known as, Emily Elizabeth Alvarez

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Western District of Texas

(04-CR-1521)

---------------------

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the

sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand the case to the Western District of Texas, El Paso

Division for resentencing is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative request

for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 14 days 

________________

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined 

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 7, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
from the denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is

denied.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JULY 7, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-10326

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00246-CR-J-20-MCR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRANCE SCOTT MILTON,

a.k.a. Tee,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(July 7, 2009)

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Call, appointed counsel for Terrance Scott Milton in this appeal from
the denial of Milton’s motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the denial of Milton’s

§ 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

2
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper ve rsion filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. NO. 34,089 4 JUSTIN PACHECO, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Brett R. Loveless, District Judge 8 Gary K. King, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Law Offices of the Public Defender 12 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender 13 Santa Fe, NM 14 Steven J. Forsberg, Assistant Appellate Defender 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 VANZI, Judge. 192 {1} Defendant Justin Pacheco appeals from his conviction for driving while under 1 the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DWI) entered by the metropolitan court 2 and subsequently affirmed by the district court following an on-record review. [ DS 3 2; RP 55, 61, 62] In this Court’s notice of pr oposed disposition, we proposed to 4 affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in oppos ition, which we have duly considered. 5 We remain unpersuaded by Defendant’s arguments and therefore affirm. 6 {2} We proposed to hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing 7 the State to recall Officer Al vidrez before the State had re sted its case-in-chief. [CN 8 2] See State v. McAdams , 1972-NMCA-029, ¶ 13, 83 N.M. 544, 494 P.2d 622 9 (holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it allowed the State to 10 recall an officer to the witness stand during its case-in-chief, despite the fact that the 11 officer had already been excused from the witness stand). We instructed Defendant 12 that if he wished this Court to reach a different conclusi on, he should demonstrate why 13 this Court’s reliance on McAdams is incorrect. [CN 2-3] 14 {3} Defendant’s memorandum in opposition does not address McAdams . Instead, 15 Defendant asks this Court to adopt a standard from Illinois. [MIO 1-2] We decline this 16 invitation. 17 {4} For the reasons discussed in this Opinion and in our notice of proposed 18 summary disposition, we affirm. 193 {5} IT IS SO ORDERED. 1

__________________________________ 2 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 3 WE CONCUR: 4

_________________________________ 5 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge 6

_________________________________ 7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 8
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4734 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4734

To repeal the authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 
             to restrict mandatory pre-dispute arbitration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2014

 Mr. McHenry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 
             to restrict mandatory pre-dispute arbitration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bureau Arbitration Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT MANDATORY PRE-DISPUTE 
              ARBITRATION.

    Section 1028 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 
U.S.C. 5518) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) Study and Report.--''; and
            (2) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d).
                                 <all>
```