alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-13996

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cv-00035-WTH-PRL

LLEWELLEN FERNANDO SMITH, 

a.k.a. Llewelen F. Smith,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW,

 Respondent-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(August 28, 2017)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit 

Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 15-13996 Date Filed: 08/28/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Leland H. Kynes, appointed counsel on appeal for Llewellen F. Smith in this 

appeal from the dismissal of Smith’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, has filed a 

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the dismissal of Smith’s 

§ 2241 petition is AFFIRMED.

Case: 15-13996 Date Filed: 08/28/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infinite Graphics Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Barry B. Onufrock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                         /S/ Barry B. Onufrock
                                                         ---------------------
                                                         Barry B. Onufrock
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         December 13, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28626-28627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Interest Projects (SIPs): SIP 10-029, Pilot Study--Cancer Survivorship 
Care Planning & SIP 10-030, Evaluating Special Events as a Recruitment 
Strategy for Cancer Screening, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

TIME AND DATE: 8:30 a.m.-6 p.m., June 9, 2010 (Closed).

[[Page 28627]]


PLACE: W Hotel--Buckhead, 3377 Peachtree Road NE., Atlanta, GA 30326, 
(678) 500-3100.

STATUS: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., 
and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED: The meeting will include the initial review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
``SIP 10-029, Pilot Study--Cancer Survivorship Care Planning & SIP 10-
030, Evaluating Special Events as a Recruitment Strategy for Cancer 
Screening.''

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michelle Mathieson, Public Health 
Analyst, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, 
Office of the Director, Extramural Research Program Office, CDC, 4770 
Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: (770) 
488-3068, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7aab3afff87a4a3a4e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1578617d2d557671763b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-12212 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  amended  Quarterly  Report  of  Applied  DNA
Sciences,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30,
2006, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, James  Hayward,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.   The   Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




                                                     /s/  KURT JENSEN
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Kurt Jensen
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
                                                     February 29, 2008
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofNovember 24, 2020, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the“Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
By: /s/ Randy BockenstedtName: Randy BockenstedtTitle: Senior Vice President, CollectionsDate: March 29, 2024By: /s/ Jonathan WatsonName: Jonathan WatsonTitle: Executive Vice President, TreasurerDate: March 29, 2024**
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 1 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1680 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:16:56 Page 9 of

9
Exhibit 31.3
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Sunrise Senior
Living, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.
 Date:
March 31, 2009
    
    /s/ Mark S. Ordan

Mark S. OrdanChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CADMUS
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,480
<INVENTORY>                                     26,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,599
<PP&E>                                         204,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,206
<BONDS>                                        104,671
<COMMON>                                         3,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,071
<SALES>                                         93,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,922
<CGS>                                           72,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,083
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-50112

Conference Calendar 

__________________

TOMMY LEE JACKSON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THOMAS VANNOY, Chief of Police;

JOHN PALAMARA; J. SCHARF,

Police Officer,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-93-CV-227

- - - - - - - - - -

April 18, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tommy Lee Jackson appeals from the district court’s denial

of his FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(6) motion. We have reviewed the

record and Jackson’s contentions and discern no error by the

district court. See Jackson v. Vannoy, No. W-93-CA-227 (W.D.

Tex. Jan. 30, 1996). Jackson’s appeal presents arguments

determined against him in his previous appeal. Jackson v.

Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 148
No. 96-50112

-2-

(1995). This appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5th Cir.

R. 42.2.

We caution Jackson that the filing of frivolous appeals in

this court will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Jackson is further cautioned to review all pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court. Because of the disposition of the appeal, Jackson’s

motions for substitution of parties, a transcript and documents,

and additional parts of the record are moot and they are denied

as such.

APPEAL DISMISSED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTIONS

WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,600,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (183,933)
<INVENTORY>                                    516,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,396,974
<PP&E>                                       7,697,821
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,960,606)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,239,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,136,734
<BONDS>                                      1,654,201
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,181,697
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,733,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,239,383
<SALES>                                      4,003,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,158,778
<CGS>                                        2,948,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,948,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 99,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,315
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,315
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5019 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 594
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5019

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           November 13, 2014

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, as the ``Specialist 
                 Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 594

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5019

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, as the ``Specialist 
                 Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 13, 2014

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### DUDLEY B. HOLBROOK, Appellant, *v.*JOHN BAKER, Respondent.

*Complaint in County Court —failure to allege that defendant is a resident, does not render it demurrable.*

■Where a complaint, in an action brought in a County Court, fails to allege that the defendant is a resident of the county, a dismissal thereof on the trial, on the ground that it did not state that the defendant was a resident of the comity, will not be sustained where the defendant has answered on the merits.

*Judge*v. *Hall*(5 Dans., 69), overruled.

Appeal from a judgment entered, in the County Court of Westchester county, upon an order dismissing the complaint herein, on the ground that it appeared from the complaint that the court had not jurisdiction of the action.

This action was brought in the Westchester County Court to recover for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered. The defendant appeared by his attorney, and answered on the merits. On the trial, after a jury had been impanneled and sworn, a motion was made by defendant’s counsel to dismiss the complaint, on'the ground that it did not state upon its face that the defendant was a resident' of the county of Westchester, which was granted. The complaint alleged, “ that at the several and respective days and times hereinafter mentioned and set forth, the above-named defendant was a resident of the village of Sing Sing, in the county of Westchester.”

*Wm. O.*Valentine, for the appellant.

*O. B.*Palmer, for the respondent.

GILBERT, J.:

If the complaint in this case does not show that the County Court had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, it contains nothing showing that such court had not jurisdiction thereof. The complaint was dismissed on the latter ground. That was error. In the case of *Judge v. Hall*(5 Lans., 69), this point was, we think, erroneously decided. The Code of Civil Procedure (§ 498) author*177izes sucb an objection to be taken by answer. If not so taken, it is waived, for when tbe court has jurisdiction of the subject-matter an appearance will confer jurisdiction of the person. *(McCormick*v. *Penn. Cent. R. R.,*49 N. Y., 303.) We are inclined to hold that the complaint shows on its face that the court had jurisdiction of the person of the defendant; but it is not necessary to determine that point.

The judgment must be reversed, with costs.

Barnard, P. «J., and DyicmaN, «JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed and now trial granted, costs to abide event.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00615-CV

In re Sheik Tahuti, Elfreda Allen, and Pyramid Bonds

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TARRANT COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. We

deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Henson

Filed: September 28, 2012
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 8, 2020

Order 

Clerk

July 8, 2020

160075

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 160075

v COA: 348417

Wayne CC: 72-002229-FH

RICHARD LOUIS PALOMBO, Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, having received notice that defendant-appellant died 

during the pendency of this appeal, the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED. 

People v Peters, 449 Mich 515; 537 NW2d 160 (1995).