alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


 


 



CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED – CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION. THE OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH “[***].”




 


 


 



CHANGE MANAGEMENT FORM #8


TO STATEMENT OF WORK #3



	
Program: Support.com, XH Remote Support Program SOW #3 (“SOW #3) dated March 21, 2014

	
PCR No.:


	
Originator:  Joy Park

	
Date: May 24, 2016


	
Department: NCO

	
Phone #: [***]

	
Title: Vice President


	
Locations Impacted:  Work at Home Locations


	
Requested Implementation Date: February 10, 2016


	
Estimated Hours: (LOE)

	
x Billable        o Non-Billable

	
Billing Rate/Hour: See below


	
Fixed Fee Cost (if applicable)  N/A


	
Type of Change:  Incentive Program


	
Scope of Change:

	
X Minor (Anything within current contract)

	
oMajor (may require contract amendment)


MUST BE REVIEWED BY Business and/or P&L Owner


	
Reason for Change: Comcast and Support.com agree that the purpose of this change management form (“CMF”) is for an incentive program as set forth in more detail below.  Unless specifically provided in this CMF, all other terms of SOW #3 remain unchanged.


	
Area(s) of Change


	
   oAccounting/Payroll

	
   o Network


	
   o Data Processing

	
   o Resource Planning


	
   o General Facilities

	
   o Quality Assurance


	
   o Human Resources

	
   o Telecom


	
   o IT/BI

	
   o Training


	
   o Operations

	
   o Recruiting


	
  × Other:  Incentive Program












Effective [***] (“CMF Term”), Vendor shall invoice Comcast [***] per install of the XH camera product that supports the 24/7 recording feature and [***] per Connect of the 24/7 recording feature for a Comcast XH customer.  “Connect” for purposes of this CMF is defined as a Vendor CSR entering a work order for the 24/7 recording feature into the Comcast biller and activating the 24/7 recording feature on a Comcast XH customer’s account as requested by the Comcast XH customer.







Comcast Authorization


Comcast Representative’s Signature______________/s/ Joy Park ____________________________________________







Print Name________Joy Park__________________________Date___________06/02/2016________________________







Support.com Authorization


Support.com Representative’s Signature____________/s/ Michelle Johnson____________________________________




Print Name_______ Michelle Johnson___________________Date___________05/29/2016________________________




 


 


 



*** CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION ***
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |       /s/Steven D. Cordes  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                              |
|   | Date: August 12, 2011                               |
|   |                                                |
|   |       /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                             |
|   | Date: August 12, 2011                               |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
CESAR ANTONIO BECERRA,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 30050

D.C. No. 3:14

- cr

- 00227

- MO

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 7, 2019

Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO, ** District Judge.

Cesar Antonio Becerra moved to suppress evidence seized during the
February 25, 2014 arrest
, on the theory that the police lacked probable cause. The

district court denied that motion

. Becerra was eventually found g uilty of all the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

SEP 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

charges related to the February 2014 arrest

. He now appeals the district court’s

denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm the district court’s denial of the

motion to suppress

.
“Probable cause to arrest exists when officers have knowl edge or reasonably
trustworthy information sufficient to lead a person of reasonable caution to believe
that an offense has been or is being committed by the person being arrested.”

United States v. Lopez , 482 F.3d 1067, 1072 (9th Cir. 2007). Here the po lice
watched the informant set up a drug transaction with Becerra via text message.
Moreover, that informant, who was known to the police and who had provided

reliable information in the past, told the police that he previously had purchased

heroin from B ecerra at the location where Becerra planned to meet the informant.
Becerra was then followed to that very location. “Because the [informant]
correctly predicted the suspect’s movement, a police officer could reasonably
conclude that there was some degree of reliability to the [informant’s] claim that
the suspect was engaged in criminal activity.” Foster v. City of In dio , 908 F.3d

1204, 1214 (9th Cir. 2018) (per curiam)

. A reasonable person with the information
in the Portland police’s possession would believe that Becerra was in the process
of committing a crime
, namely the possession of heroin with intent to distrib ute

. Becerra also argues that at trial the district court erred by failing to instruct
the jurors orally as to the law they were required to apply during deliberations. In3

a concurrently filed opinion, we reverse and remand for a new trial because of that

erro r.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
IB 

House Calendar No. 136 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4751 

[Report No. 113–579] 

To make technical corrections to Public Law 110–229 to reflect the renaming 

of the Bainbridge Island Japanese American Exclusion Memorial, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2014 

Mr. KILMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 


sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4751 RH

A BILL 

To make technical corrections to Public Law 110–229 to 

reflect the renaming of the Bainbridge Island Japanese 

American Exclusion Memorial, and for other purposes. 


sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4751 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAINBRIDGE ISLAND JAPANESE AMERICAN EX4 CLUSION MEMORIAL. 

5 Section 313 of the Consolidated Natural Resources 

6 Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–229) is amended as follows: 

7 (1) In the heading of subsection (b), by striking 

8 ‘‘JAPANESE AMERICAN MEMORIAL’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘JAPANESE AMERICAN EXCLUSION MEMORIAL’’. 

10 (2) In the heading of subsection (c)(5)(C), by 

11 striking ‘‘JAPANESE AMERICAN MEMORIAL’’ and in12 serting ‘‘JAPANESE AMERICAN EXCLUSION MEMO13 RIAL’’. 

14 (3) In subsection (c)(5)(C), by striking ‘‘Japa15 nese American Memorial’’ and inserting ‘‘Japanese 

16 American Exclusion Memorial’’. 


sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 136 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4751 

[Report No. 113–579] 

A BILL 

To make technical corrections to Public Law 110– 

and for other purposes. land Japanese American Exclusion Memorial, 229 to reflect the renaming of the Bainbridge IsSEPTEMBER 8, 2014 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


sroberts on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sal Giordano, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fedders Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent three month period ended June 30, 2004 (the registrant's
      fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2004

/s/ Sal Giordano, Jr.
-----------------------------------------
Sal Giordano, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual report of Physiometrix, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Williams,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Physiometrix, Inc.


Date: March 28, 2003                     /s/ JOHN A. WILLIAMS
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         John A. Williams
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4801 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Energy to prepare a report 

on the impact of thermal insulation on both energy and 

water use for potable hot water. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4801 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REPORT ON ENERGY AND WATER SAVINGS PO2 TENTIAL FROM THERMAL INSULATION. 

3 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

4 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in con5 sultation with appropriate Federal agencies and relevant 

6 stakeholders, shall submit to the Committee on Energy 

7 and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee 

8 on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 

9 a report on the impact of thermal insulation on both en10 ergy and water use systems for potable hot and chilled 

11 water in Federal buildings, and the return on investment 

12 of installing such insulation. 

13 (b) CONTENTS.—The report shall include— 

14 (1) an analysis based on the cost of municipal 

15 or regional water for delivered water and the avoided 

16 cost of new water; and 

17 (2) a summary of energy and water savings, in18 cluding short term and long term (20 years) projec19 tions of such savings. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NO. 07-08-0200-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JULY 7, 2008

______________________________

BARRY PARTAIN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 286th DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY;

NO. 08026594; HON. HAROLD PHELAN, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant appeals from his conviction for possession of attempted aggravated

assault causing serious bodily injury. Because the court reporter had not filed a record, we

abated and remanded the cause to the 286th District Court of Hockley County (trial court).

The latter convened a hearing attended by appellant. At the proceeding, appellant

informed the trial court that he no longer cared to prosecute the appeal. The trial court

found this decision to be knowing and voluntary. Furthermore, it along with appellant's

representations were memorialized in a supplemental clerk's record filed with this court.
2

Although we have no motion to dismiss before us as required by Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), Rule 2 of the same rules permits us to suspend the operation

of an existing rule. TEX. R. APP. P. 2; see Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Tex.

App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. ref'd). Therefore, pursuant to Rule 2, and because appellant has

clearly revealed his desire to forego appeal, we suspend Rule 42.2(a) and dismiss the

appeal based upon appellant's representation to the trial court.

Having so dismissed the appeal, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 1 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1954 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:04:08 Page 9 of

9
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4838 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the railroad station located at 2955 Market 

Street in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known 

as ‘‘30th Street Station’’, as the ‘‘William H. Gray III 

30th Street Station’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4838 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The railroad station located at 2955 Market Street 

3 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, commonly known as ‘‘30th 

4 Street Station’’, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘William H. Gray III 30th Street Station’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the railroad 

9 station referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a 

10 reference to the ‘‘William H. Gray III 30th Street Sta11 tion’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Greater NY Medical Care, P.C., as Assignee of Owoeye, Princess, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Offices of Peter C. Merani, P.C. (Eric M. Wahrburg, Esq.), for appellant.Lana Sukhman, Esq., for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Mary Kim Dollard, J.), entered December 2, 2014. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $3,119.44.</p><p>ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from a decision of that court dated June 28, 2013 is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment entered December 2, 2014 (<i>see</i> CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial. </p><p>Following a nonjury trial in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the Civil Court determined that defendant had demonstrated, prima facie, through the presentation of credible expert witness testimony, that the medical services at issue had not been medically necessary and that plaintiff had not rebutted defendant's case. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Civil Court awarded judgment to plaintiff in the principal sum of $3,119.44. In light of the contradiction between the Civil Court's findings and its award, a new trial is warranted.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial. </p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 22, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6556** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RODEQUES LAMONT WILSON, a/k/a Mont, a/k/a Flip , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 4 :15

- cr - 00095

- BHH

- 9 )

Submitted : August 18 , 2016 Decided: September 8, 2016

Before WILKINSON , KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Rodeques Lamont Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bindi ng precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rodeques Lamont Wilson appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion to compel his attorney to turn over to him the

c ase file in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible erro r. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson , No. 4:15

- cr - 00095

- BHH

- 9 (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1762 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/30/19 08:34:32 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1762 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/30/19 08:34:32 Page 2 of

2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

139103 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139103 

 COA: 291346 

Oakland CC: 2008-221118-FC 

VANDIVER HOWARD, III, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 20, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.