alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4808 

To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the regulation of emissions of 

carbon dioxide from new or existing power plants under certain circumstances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2014 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the regulation of 

emissions of carbon dioxide from new or existing power 

plants under certain circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coal Country Protec5 tion Act’’ or the ‘‘Protecting Jobs, Families, and the 

6 Economy From EPA Overreach Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4808 IH

1 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF EMISSIONS OF CARBON DIOXIDE 

2 FROM NEW OR EXISTING POWER PLANTS. 

3 (a) LIMITATION ON REGULATION.—The Clean Air 

4 Act is amended by inserting after section 312 (42 U.S.C. 

5 7612) the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 313. LIMITATION ON REGULATION OF EMISSIONS OF 

7 CARBON DIOXIDE FROM NEW OR EXISTING 

8 POWER PLANTS. 

9 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF NEW OR EXISTING POWER

10 PLANT.—In this section, the term ‘new or existing power 

11 plant’ means a fossil fuel-fired power plant that com12 mences operation at any time. 

13 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding any other provi14 sion of law (including regulations), the Administrator may 

15 not promulgate any regulation or guidance that limits or 

16 prohibits any new carbon dioxide emissions from a new 

17 or existing power plant, and no such regulation or guid18 ance shall have any force or effect, until the date on 

19 which— 

20 ‘‘(1) the Secretary of Labor certifies to the Ad21 ministrator that the regulation or guidance will not 

22 generate any loss of employment; 

23 ‘‘(2) the Director of the Congressional Budget 

24 Office certifies to the Administrator that the regula25 tion or guidance will not result in any loss in the 

26 gross domestic product of the United States; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4808 IH

1 ‘‘(3) the Administrator of the Energy Informa2 tion Administration certifies to the Administrator 

3 that the regulation or guidance will not generate any 

4 increase in electricity rates in the United States; and 

5 ‘‘(4) the Chairperson of the Federal Energy 

6 Regulatory Commission and the President of the 

7 North American Electric Reliability Corporation cer8 tify to the Administrator the reliability of electricity 

9 delivery under the regulation or guidance.’’. 

10 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—The Clean Air Act is 

11 amended by redesignating the second section 317 (42 

12 U.S.C. 7617) (relating to economic impact assessment) as 

13 section 318. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Anna L. Galer, Respondent, v. James Galer, Appellant.

Order in so far as appealed from reversed, without costs, and motion for a bill of paiv ticulars granted to this extent: 1. The plaintiff shall specify when the defendant had an attack of delirium tremens. 3. When and at what time of the year plaintiff was obliged to leave the house for safety and to get rest and medical treatment. , 3. When the defendant neglected to provide and pay for medical treatment for plaintiff, and when plaintiff had to borrow money to pay for doctor’s bills, and the amount thus obtained. 4. The improper acts constituting the course of defendant toward plaintiff, which has been such continuously for many years as to greatly injure and impair her health. 5. What the conditions are that cause plaintiff to fear that her husband will take her life if she continues to live with him. No opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(a)(1).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21049

(Summary Calendar)

SYBIL A. KERRY and

SHEILA A. SMITH,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

WESTERN ATLAS INTERNATIONAL

INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-3870)

April 18, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this appeal from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment dismissing the TITLE VII 1 claims of Plaintiffs-Appellants

Sybil A. Kerry and Sheila A. Smith, based specifically on sex2

discrimin ation in connection with a reduction in force (RIF) by

Defendant-Appellee Western Atlas International Incorporated

(Western), Kerry and Smith contend that the district court erred in

holding that Western had discharged its burden of production of a

non-discriminatory reason for its employment action; in failing to

consider certain evidence regarding Western’s financial distress

that allegedly caused the RIF; in failing to consider evidence of

Kerry’s and Smith’s superior qualifications; in failing to consider

evidence that would pro duce a genuine issue of fact as to the

pretextual nature of the job offer made by Western to Kerry; and in

failing to find that Western terminated only women in the RIF.

Kerry a nd Smith also assert error by the district court in its

disposition of their state law claims of intentional infliction of

emotional distress.

In our de novo review on appeal, we have carefully considered

the arguments advanced by counsel in briefs to this court, the

summary judgment record on appeal, and the Memorandum and Opinion

of the district court. Based on this consideration, we are

convinced that the district court committed no reversible error in

grantin g Western’s Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims of

Kerry and Smith, including, without limitation, th eir state law

claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, agreeing

entirely with the reasons s et forth by the district court in its

Memorandum and Opinion. Consequently, the district court’s summary

judgment dismissing the actions of Kerry and Smith is, in all3

respects,

AFFIRMED.
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJuly 22, 2020, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2020-2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Agreement”)during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
By: 
/s/ Randy Bockenstedt
Name: Randy BockenstedtTitle: Senior Vice President, CollectionsDate: March 29, 2024By: 
/s/ Jonathan Watson
Name: Jonathan WatsonTitle: Executive Vice President, TreasurerDate: March 29, 2024**
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice. 

WHPacific, Inc. Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Claim No: 1088

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089) 

Claim Amount: $185,583.03 

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________ Date: June 21, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2728 Filed: 06/24/19 Entered: 06/24/19 11:51:23 Page 1 of

2
CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor

New York, NY 10019

Attn: Vladimir Jelisavcic

CHEROKEE DEBT ACQUISITION, LLC

Vladimir Jelisavcic

Manager

185,583.03

100

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2728 Filed: 06/24/19 Entered: 06/24/19 11:51:23 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 11


                             CityFed Financial Corp.
                   Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss




                                              Three Months Ended
                                              ------------------
                                                   March 31,
                                                   ---------

                                               1999           1998
                                               ----           ----
 Computation of Loss Per Share:


 Weighted average number of shares
    outstanding                             18,715,609     18,714,646


 Loss applicable to  common stock:1


  From continuing operations              $ (2,110,000)  $ (2,094,000)
                                          =============  =============

  From discontinued operations            $          -   $          -
                                          =============  =============

  Net loss                                $ (2,110,000)  $ (2,094,000)
                                          =============  =============

 Basic loss per share:


  From continuing operations                     $(0.11)       $(0.11)
                                                 =======       =======

  From discontinued operations                   $     -       $     -
                                                 =======       =======

  Net loss                                       $(0.11)       $(0.11)
                                                 =======       =======

                             ----------------------
1 Losses applicable to Common Stock are net of preferred stock dividends for the
three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 in the amount of $2,159,000.
!"


#$

%


&'&
#(

&
&
%)



(

*+,-..//,01
 %

*.2
3.33






4

)
&
	





5(6
)

&(


%%
76
)

&


8
%&)


'



6(

(''

'


3.*9
(
:
;


<



&

(
&&%





'6(

<
%

&

<
&&%
;

'


<


%
=&

#2




&(
''&(


=&
%
&((
)
)

'6;



)

'>?>@A
>B
CDEFGBD
H
I>I@JK
LDED>MD
'&
'


8
%&)

2






%
(7
'
#2


6

6

'

&;
N

<

<(
6

'



&2

<
7;


'

7&

&)



<(
6

'

&;


';


)
'
(

&6
&(
'

(
'
;

7

7
<

<
O)P

O)


'
<

<
<

O
'

<




7(;

(
'



<

5





'
)
(;
76


&)
(

6

(&
)
'

=

'
(;
(
<(
7


&&




)
'
'


'
;

<(

6


&7
<

;

<(
''&
=(





<
%



&(
7)
(

'6
(;
)
)(


&();

'


(
%((
<

&&
<

(



6&)
(
7&(;

(%
&
)

6


(
((

&
(6
O)

<6
'

<
7






;



(
''&



(
<
<
7

6

<

(
7
<
&(
'

'
;




6

'
('

6
'

((;
)
O)
7
6(
%
<
<


%
(







(

&
(
%
'

'
;
(

(


'


'
5;
Q
)
'

((
&




KD@BD
K>RDS
H
KD@I
KT
CD
RTLD
KD@BD
F@I
F@U>TGBS
H
EF@JK
BDDR
KT
ET@KLT?
KVDBD
WDD?>@ABS
HW
H
KV>@X



'
2


7

7((
'

'


6
(

((((
=(
&(
<);

(




%(7

)
';



<


)

7&
'

&(
6
)

5(;

<(

)


'
;



B>RY?Z
I>I@JK
X@T[
H
&;


\(%&')2











Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12946 Filed: 09/10/22 Entered: 09/12/22 09:02:41 Page 1

of 1
Order filed April 7, 2015 , Withdrawn, Appeal Reins tated and Order filed

June 2, 2015

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00045

- CR

____________ RENE RIVERA HERNANDE Z , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11

- DCR

- 056418



### ORDER

On April 7, 2015 , this court issued an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file appellant’s brief

. Appellant’s brief was filed May 26, 2015. Accordingly, o ur order of April , 2015, is withdrawn. The appeal is reinstated. The State’s brief is due on or before Appellant’s brief is due on or b efore June 25, 2015

. PER CURIAM
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4974 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide for the repayment of higher education loans for certain 

employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2014 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER (for herself, Mr. LOEBSACK, and Mr. TIERNEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide for the repayment 

of higher education loans for certain employees of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Doctors’ Education 

5 Loans Impact VA Employee Retention Act’’ or the ‘‘DE6 LIVER Act’’. 


tjames@gpo.gov on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4974 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPAYMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION LOANS FOR 

2 EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATING IN AN INCOME3 BASED REPAYMENT PLAN. 

4 (a) PROGRAM.—Chapter 7 of title 38, United States 

5 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 section: 

7 ‘‘§ 713. Program for repayment of higher education 

8 loans for employees participating in an 

9 income-based repayment plan 

10 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall estab11 lish and carry out a program to make each monthly pay12 ment owed by an employee of the Department on a covered 

13 loan during the period of service of such employee to the 

14 Department. 

15 ‘‘(b) COVERED LOAN DEFINED.—In this section, the 

16 term ‘covered loan’ means a loan— 

17 ‘‘(1) made, insured, or guaranteed under part 

18 B or part D of title IV of the Higher Education Act 

19 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.); and 

20 ‘‘(2) in repayment under an income-based re21 payment plan under section 493C of such Act (20 

22 U.S.C. 1098e).’’. 

23 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of 

24 sections for chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is 

25 amended by adding at the end the following new item: 


tjames@gpo.gov on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4974 IH

‘‘713. Program for repayment of higher education loans for employees participating in an income-based repayment plan.’’. 

Æ 


tjames@gpo.gov on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-06591) pertaining to the 1981 Stock Option Plan, 1990 Employee
Stock  Purchase  Plan,  1991 Stock  Option  Plan,  and 1996 Stock Option Plan of
Calgene,  Inc.  of our report  dated  February  24,  1997,  with  respect to the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Calgene, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the six months ended December 31, 1996.



                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Sacramento, California
March 26, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          53,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,716
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,545
<PP&E>                                         819,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,103,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,065
<BONDS>                                        664,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           219
<OTHER-SE>                                     334,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,103,451
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,219
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,599
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,828
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,213
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4948 

To provide for emergency supplemental appropriations for the Office of the 

Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2014 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee 

on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for emergency supplemental appropriations for 

the Office of the Inspector General of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Investigation and 

5 Accountability Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4948 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR THE OFFICE 

2 OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DE3 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 The following sums are appropriated, out of any 

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fis6 cal year 2014: 

7 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

8 DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

9 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

10 For an additional amount for ‘‘Office of Inspector 

11 General’’, $12,000,000: Provided, That such amount is 

12 designated by the Congress as an emergency requirement 

13 pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget 

14 and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, except that 

15 such amount shall be available only if the President subse16 quently so designates such amount and transmits such 

17 designation to the Congress. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
J-S20004-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. CHARLES E. CARLSON, III Appellant No. 106 WDA 2015

Appeal from the PCRA Order December 22, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-04-CR-0002338-1999
BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OLSON, J., and PLATT, J. * JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED APRIL 15, 2016 On August 17, 2012, Carlson filed a petition pursu ant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), asserting that the mandatory life sentences that he was serving had been declared unconstitutio nal by the Supreme Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama , 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012). It is undisputed that Carlson was under age 18 at the time he committed the murders for which he received life sentences. See Appellee’s Brief, at 1. The PCRA court deferred action on Carlson’s petition pe nding the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s decision in Commonwealth v. Cunningham , 81 A.3d 1 (Pa. 2013).

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Cour t.J-S20004-16

- 2 -

After the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that Miller was not an avenue of relief on collateral review, the PCRA cou rt denied Carlson’s petition. This timely appeal followed. While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court o f the United States held, in Montgomery v. Louisiana , 136 S.Ct. 718 (2016), that Miller was retroactive and provided a remedy on collatera l review. Montgomery therefore overruled Cunningham

. As a result, we reverse the PCRA court’s order dis missing Carlson’s petition, vacate the judgment of sentence, and rema nd for re-sentencing pursuant to Miller

and Montgomery

. Order reversed. Judgment of sentence vacated. Cas e remanded for resentencing. Jurisdiction relinquished. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 4/15/2016