alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket T-2-2010]


Foreign-Trade Zone 196 Temporary/Interim Manufacturing Authority 
ATC Logistics & Electronics (Cell Phone Kitting and Distribution); 
Notice of Approval

    On March 30, 2010, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board filed an application submitted by the ATC Logistics & 
Electronics, operator of Site 2, FTZ 196, requesting temporary/interim 
manufacturing (T/IM) authority to process cell phones under FTZ 
procedures within Site 2, in Fort Worth, Texas.
    The application was processed in accordance with T/IM procedures, 
as authorized by FTZ Board Orders 1347 (69 FR 52857, 8/30/04) and 1480 
(71 FR 55422, 9/22/06), including notice in the Federal Register 
inviting public comment (75 FR 17691-17692, 4/7/2010). The FTZ staff 
examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the 
criteria for approval under T/IM procedures. Pursuant to the authority 
delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary in the above-referenced 
Board Orders, the application is approved, effective this date, until 
May 18, 2012, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.28.

    Dated: May 18, 2010.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13054 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
     <LEGEND> This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted
from  the  Partnership's  unaudited  financial  statements  for the  year  ended
December  31,  1999  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Sep-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                  4,201
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        4,201
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          4,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      26
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              3,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            4,201
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          188
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            78
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        78
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               78
<EPS-BASIC>                              1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.29


</TABLE>
Dissenting Opinion from Denial of En Banc Reconsideration filed April 2

, 20 20.

In t he



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00498

- CR

NO. 14

- 15

- 00499

- CR

SCOTT NILES

, Appellant

v

.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 14

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No s

. 2018917 & 2018918

DISSENTING OPINION FROM DENIAL OF EN BANC

RECONSIDERATION

I join the dissenting opinion from the denial of en banc reconsideration. I write

separat ely to note that no motions for rehearing were filed in these appeals. Were

they to have been filed, I would have voted to grant rehearing.2 /s/ Charles A. Spain

Justice

En Banc Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher, Wise, Jewell,

Bourliot, Zimmerer, Spain, Hassan, and Poissant. (Bourliot , J., dissenting, joined by

Zimmerer, J., Spain, J., Hassan, J.; Spain, J., dissenting).

Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2( b).
#### JAMES LINK v. CAROLINA & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

(Filed 11 December, 1929.)

Master and Servant E d — Action under Federal Employers’ Liability Act must be brought within two years regardless of infancy.

The Federal Employer’s Liability Act, providing that no action should be brought thereunder unless commenced within two years from the day from which the cause of action accrued, does not permit an extension of time specified by reason of infancy or other disability, and an action not brought within the .time prescribed will be dismissed.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sink, Special Judge,*at June Special Term, 1929, of MeckleNbubg.

Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury.

Plaintiff alleges that' tbe defendant is a common carrier by railroad, engaged in interstate commerce; tbat on 4 March, 1926, be was a minor 19 years of age, employed by tbe defendant in such commerce, and tbat on said date be was injured through tbe negligence of defendant’s servants or agents.

*79Tbis action was commenced 18 September, 1928, more tban two years after tbe date of tbe injury.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence, be appeals, assigning errors.

*Ural R. Murphy and Stewart, MacRae & Bobbitt for plaintiff.*

*J ohn A. Marion and J ohn M. Robinson for defendant.*

Stacy, 0. J.

Tbe action was properly dismissed on authority of *Murray v. R. R.,*196 N. C., 695, 146 S. E., 801, and *Belch v. R. R.,*176 N. C., 22, 96 S. E., 640.

Tbe Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U. S. C. A., sec. 56) provides: “No action shall be maintained under tbis chapter unless commenced within two years from tbe day the cause of action accrued.”

There is no provision in this statute extending or tolling the time for filing suit by reason of infancy or other disability. *Gillette v. Del. L. & W. Ry.,*102 Atl. (N. J.), 673 (minority of plaintiff); *Bement v. Grand Rapids Ry. Co.,*160 N. *W.*(Mich.), 424 (fraudulent representations of defendant’s agent which caused plaintiff to delay); *Alvarado v. So. Pac. Ry. Co.,*193 S. W. (Tex.), 1108 (insanity resulting from the injury).

Indeed, it has been held with us that a provision in a contract of insurance, limiting the time for instituting suit to recover under the policy, is not affected by the minority of the plaintiff. *Beard v. Sovereign Lodge,*184 N. C., 154, 113 S. E., 661; *Heilig v. Ins. Co.,*152 N. C., 358, 67 S. E., 927.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MidSouth Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, C.R. Cloutier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ C. R. Cloutier


C.R. Cloutier


Chief Executive Officer


August 10, 2009
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2378 Filed: 06/04/19 Entered: 06/04/19 12:38:34 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2378 Filed: 06/04/19 Entered: 06/04/19 12:38:34 Page 2 of

4
EXHIBIT A

Standard Parties Email Service List

Served via Email

DESCRIPTION NAME NOTICE NAME EMAIL

Counsel to Debtors Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Jessica Liou, 

Matthew Goren 

stephen.karotkin@weil.com

matthew.goren@weil.com

jessica.liou@weil.com

Special Counsel to Debtors Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

Attn: Paul H. Zumbro, Kevin J. Orsini, 

George E. Zobitz, Stephen M. Kessing 

and Nicholas A. Dorsey, Omid H. 

Nasab

pzumbro@cravath.com

korsini@cravath.com

jzobitz@cravath.com

skessing@cravath.com

ndorsey@cravath.com

onasab@cravath.com

Counsel to Debtors Keller & Benvenutti LLP Attn: Tobias Keller, Jane Kim

tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com

jkim@kellerb envenutti.com

Office of the United States Trustee Office of the United States Trustee 

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq. & Timothy 

Lafreddi, Esq., Lynette C. Kelly, Marta 

E. Villacorta

James.L.Snyder@usdoj.gov

timothy.s.laffredi@usdoj.gov

lynette.c.kelly@usdoj.gov

Marta.Villacorta@usdoj.gov

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Samuel A. 

Khalil, Paul S. Aronzon, Gregory A. 

Bray, Thomas R. Keller

ddunne@milbank.com

skhalil@milbank.com

Paronzon@milbank.com

Gbray@milbank.com

TKreller@milbank.com

Counsel for the administrative agent under the Debtors' 

debtor in possession financing facilities Stroock & Stoock & Lavan LLP

Attn: Kristopher M. Hansen, Erez E. 

Gilad, Matthew G. Garofalo, Frank A. 

Merola

khansen@stroock.com

egilad@stroock.com

mgarofalo@stroock.com

fmerola@stroock.com

Counsel for the agent under the Debtors’ proposed debtor in 

possession financing facilities Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

Attn: Eli J. Vonnegut, David Schiff, 

Timothy Graulich

eli.vonnegut@davispolk.com

david.schiff@davispolk.com

timothy.graulich@davispolk.com

Counsel to California Public Utilities Commission

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & 

Garrison LLP

Attn: Alan W. Kornberg, Brian S. 

Hermann, Walter R. Rieman, Sean A. 

Mitchell, Neal P. Donnelly

akornberg@paulweiss.com

bhermann@paulweiss.com

wrieman@paulweiss.com

smitchell@paulweiss.com

ndonnelly@paulweiss.com

Interested Party United States on behalf of the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission U.S. Department of Justice Attn: Danielle A. Pham danielle.pham@usdoj.gov

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2378 Filed: 06/04/19 Entered: 06/04/19 12:38:34 Page 3 of

4
EXHIBIT B

Standard Parties Hardcopy First Class Mail Service List

Served via First Class Mail

DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS

Debtors

PG&E Corporation and 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Attn: Janet Loduca

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94105

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Attn: General Counsel

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2378 Filed: 06/04/19 Entered: 06/04/19 12:38:34 Page 4 of

4
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, William C. Stone, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SS&C Technologies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [not applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: April 2, 2007 /s/ William C. Stone   William C. Stone   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 14, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00154

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.N.H., A CHILD,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA00642 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge P residing



### O R D E R

Appellant appeals the trial court’s termination of her parental rights. Appellant’s court

appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. We have held that in parental

- termination appeals, a procedure akin to Anders is necessary to best protect the statutory right to counsel on appeal, to provide a procedural mechanism for counsel to fulfill his ethical obligations, to assist the court in deciding appeals, and to provide consistent procedures for all indigent litigants. See In re R.R. , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.

— San Ant onio 2003, no pet.). In compliance with the procedure set out in
Anders , appellant’s attorney has stated that he sent a letter to appellant, which explained her right to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2014); In re R.R. , 2003 WL 21157944, at *4. In the letter to appellant, counsel stated that he had enclosed copies of the brief and motion to withdraw. See Kelly , 436 S.W.3d at 313; In re R.R.

, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4.

Counsel’s letter also advi sed appellant that if s he wishes to review the appellate record,

s he must file a motion in this court within ten days of receiving counsel’s letter. Counsel also enclosed a form motion for this purpose. See Kelly , 436 S.W.3d at 313; In re R.R. , 2003 WL
211 57944, at *4.

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER that s he do so on or before July 4,
2018 . If appellant files a pro se brief, appellee may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after th e date appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. We ORDER the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, to be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of
the court._________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 14th day of June, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q
FROM EXCEL AND WORD FILES EMAILED TO MERRILL AND FAX COPIES.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         796,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  278,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,074,580
<PP&E>                                      11,653,687
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,937,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,790,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          534,050
<BONDS>                                      6,068,339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,188,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,790,565
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,430,267
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               971,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             596,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (137,299)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (139,299)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                             CityFed Financial Corp.
              Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss




                                           Three Months Ended                Nine Months Ended
                                              September 30,                    September 30,
                                   -------------------------------      ------------------------------

                                       1997             1996               1997               1996
                                       ----             ----               ----               ----
<S>                                <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>       
Computation of Loss Per Share:

Weighted average number of
   shares outstanding              18,714,646         18,714,646         18,714,646         18,714,646

 Loss applicable to  common
    stock:1


  From continuing operations      $(2,077,000)       $(2,088,000)       $(6,267,000)       $(6,307,000)
                                  ============       ============       ============       ============
                                                                         
  From discontinued operations    $         -        $  (200,000)       $         -        $(4,350,000)
                                  ============       ============       ============       ============

  Net loss                        $(2,077,000)       $(2,288,000)       $(6,267,000)      $(10,657,000)
                                  ============       ============       ============      =============


 Loss per share:

  From continuing operations           $(0.11)            $(0.11)            $(0.33)           $(0.34)
                                       =======            =======            =======           =======

  From discontinued operations         $    -             $(0.01)            $    -            $(0.23)
                                       =======            =======            =======           =======

  Net loss                             $(0.11)            $(0.12)            $(0.33)           $(0.57)
                                       =======            =======            =======           =======


</TABLE>

----------
1 Losses applicable to Common Stock are net of preferred stock dividends for the
three months ended  September  30, 1997 and 1996 in the amount of  $2,159,000 in
each  period.  Losses  applicable  to Common  Stock are net of  preferred  stock
dividends for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1996 in the amount of
$6,477,000 in each period.


                                       28
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 1, 2010 / Notices 30481 

and Warren Counties, Missouri. The 

NOI was published in the Federal 

Register on April 22, 2008. This 

rescission is based on a reduction in the 

scope of the project. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peggy J. Casey, Environmental Projects 

Team Leader, FHWA Division Office, 

3220 West Edgewood, Suite H, Jefferson 

City, Missouri 65109, Telephone: (573) 

638–2620 or Kevin Keith, Chief 

Engineer, Missouri Department of 

Transportation, P.O. Box 270, Jefferson 

City, Missouri 65102, Telephone: (573) 

526–5678. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

FHWA, in cooperation with the 

Missouri Department of Transportation 

(MoDOT), is rescinding the NOI to 

prepare an EIS for a project that had 

been proposed to improve the 

transportation system on Route 47 in 

Warren and Franklin Counties, 

Missouri. The NOI is being rescinded 

because the scope of the project has 

been reduced from the 2008 proposal to 

replace the existing bridge over the 

Missouri River and relocate or 

reconstruct Missouri Route 47 between 

Route 94 in Warren County and Fifth 

Street in the city of Washington in 

Franklin County. The currently 

proposed project will replace the Route 

47 Bridge either immediately upstream 

or downstream from the existing bridge. 

The project extends roughly from 

Augusta Bottom Road in Warren County 

south to the touchdown in the city of 

Washington in Franklin County. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning 

and Construction. The regulations 

implementing Executive Order 12372 

regarding intergovernmental consultation on 

Federal programs and activities apply to this 

program.) 

Issued on: May 25, 2010. 

Peggy J. Casey, 

Environmental Projects Team Leader, 

Jefferson City. 

[FR Doc. 2010–13008 Filed 5–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Thrift Supervision 

[AC–42: OTS No. H–4706] 

Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc., 

Jacksonville, IL; Approval of 

Conversion Application 

Notice is hereby given that on May 14, 

2010, the Office of Thrift Supervision 

approved the application of Jacksonville 

Bancorp, MHC, and Jacksonville 

Savings Bank, Jacksonville, Illinois, to 

convert to the stock form of 

organization. Copies of the application 

are available for inspection by 

appointment (phone number: 202–906– 

5922 or e-mail 

Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov) at the 

Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the 

OTS Central Regional Office, 1 South 

Wacker Drive, Suite 2000, Chicago, 

Illinois 60606. 

Dated: May 21, 2010. 

By the Office of Thrift Supervision. 

Sandra E. Evans, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12819 Filed 5–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6720–01–M 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES