alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>






                                     Intermet Corporation

                       Computation of Earnings per Common Share


<CAPTION>
                                          Three months ended              Nine months ended
                                       ------------------------        -------------------------
                                       October 2,     October 1,       October 2,     October 1,
                                        1994            1995              1994           1995
                                       ------------------------        -------------------------
                                              (In thousands of dollars, except per share data)

<S>                                    <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>

Net income                             $  373          $ 3,377         $ 4,522         $19,434
                                       ========================        =========================

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding                   24,595           24,727          24,584          24,684
Dilutive effect of outstanding
  options                                  41              221              80             126
                                       ------------------------         ------------------------
Weighted average number of
  shares and equivalent shares
    outstanding                        24,636           24,948          24,664          24,810
                                      =========================        =========================
Earnings per share                    $  0.02         $   0.14         $  0.18        $   0.78
                                      =========================        ==========================
</TABLE>
#### Walter C. Anthony, Respondent, v. The City of Newburgh, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2, 2018

a0924 

# Order

Clerk October 2, 2018

156976

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156976

COA: 340809

Kent CC: 07

- 009532

- FH

SCOTT BRADY COLE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 8, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 22, 2021

No. 04-21-00306-CV

Christopher DE LOS SANTOS As Next Friend on Behalf of C.D.L.S. and V.D.L.S., Minor 

Children,

Appellant

v.

SUPERIOR SHUTTLE, LLC and Heather Contreras,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CI03550

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal was due September 21, 2021. However, appellant did 

not identify a court reporter on his docketing statement. On September 21, 2021, appellant 

filed an opposed motion to extend time to file the reporter’s record. In his motion, appellant 

states he “recently contacted the reporter responsible to make arrangements for the expedited 

preparation and filing of the reporter’s record in this matter . . ..” According to appellant, the 

court reporter may not have received the necessary information from the district clerk or him to 

prepare the record. Appellant did not identify the court reporter or state whether he has paid or 

made arrangements to pay for the record.

The motion is GRANTED and the reporter’s record is due no later than October 5, 

2021. However, appellant is hereby ORDERED to file written notice with this court no later 

than September 27, 2021 (1) identifying the court reporter and (2) providing proof that he 

has paid or made arrangements to pay for the record.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
1... There is no trial court cause number in either of these cases because relators allege the district clerk has

not filed their pleadings and assigned a cause number. 

2... We note that it is improper for relators to jointly file a petition for writ of mandamus relating to each of

their individual trial court cases. In the future, relators are encouraged to file their petitions for writ of mandamus

individually. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00063-CV

IN RE Tracey W. MURPHY and Matthew D. WHITMIRE

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 18, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On February 2, 2009, relators Tracey W. Murphy and Matthew D. Whitmire jointly filed a

petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the District Clerk of Karnes County to file and

process their pleadings.2 We conclude this court does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested

relief. This court has no mandamus jurisdiction over a district clerk unless the issuance of the writ

is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. SeeTEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b)(Vernon 2004);

In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); see also
04-09-00063-CV

-2-

In re Simmonds, 271 S.W.3d 874 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding). Relators have failed

to establish the writ they are requesting is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Accordingly,

relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 473 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 473

 To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act with respect 
  to the qualification of the director of food services of a Medicare 
        skilled nursing facility or a Medicaid nursing facility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2013

 Mr. Connolly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act with respect 
  to the qualification of the director of food services of a Medicare 
        skilled nursing facility or a Medicaid nursing facility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Food for Seniors Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. QUALIFICATION OF DIRECTOR OF FOOD SERVICES OF A MEDICARE 
              SKILLED NURSING FACILITY OR A MEDICAID NURSING FACILITY.

    (a) In General.--Sections 1819(b)(4)(A) and 1919(b)(4)(A) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i-3(b)(4)(A), 1396r(b)(4)(A)) are 
each amended by adding at the end the following: ``With respect to 
meeting the staffing requirement imposed by the Secretary to carry out 
clause (iv), the full-time director of food services of the facility, 
if not a qualified dietitian (as defined in section 483.35(a)(2) of 
title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect as of the date of 
the enactment of this section), shall be a Certified Dietary Manager 
meeting the requirements of the Certifying Board for Dietary Managers 
or have equivalent military or academic qualifications (as specified by 
the Secretary).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0162

ROBERT L. ROSE,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, BRIAN GOOTKIN,

Director; and JAMES SALMONSEN,

Warden of Montana State Prison,

Respondents and Appellees.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondents’ motion for a 30-day extension of 

time, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents are granted an extension of 

time to and including February 9, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file 

the Respondent’s response brief.

DATED this ___ day of December, 2023.

JUSTICE

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

December 18 2023

12/18/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0162
#### *L.*M. MACON v. MISS E. M. MURRAY, SAM MURRAY and JOHN MURRAY.

(Filed 7 April, 1954.)

Appeal and Error § 19—

When the pleadings upon which the case was tried are not in the record, the appeal must be dismissed. Rule of Practice in the Supreme Court No. 19.

Appeal by defendants from *Hall, S. J.,*at October Special Term, 1953, Of RANDOLPH.

Civil action to recover compensation for wort performed by plaintiff for defendants in cutting timber standing on their land, etc., heard in this Court on former appeals reported in 231 N.C. 61, 55 S.E. 2d 807, and 236 N.C. 484, 73 S.E. 2d 165, and heard, thereafter, in Superior Court, on motion of defendants to re-tax costs therein — when and where the judge presiding, “being of the opinion that no sufficient cause had been shown for granting said motion,” ordered that the motion be disallowed. Defendants excepted thereto and appeal to Supreme Court, and assign error.

*John L. Murray for defendants, appellants.*

*No counsel contra.*

Pee. Cueiam.

As the pleadings on which the case was tried have been omitted from the record, in violation of the requirements of Rule 19, Section 1 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 553, the appeal must be dismissed in accordance with the uniform practice in such cases. See *S. v. Lumber Co.,*207 N.C. 47, 175 S.E. 713, and cases cited. See also *Ins. Co. v. Bullard,*207 N.C. 652, 178 S.E. 113; *Goodman v. Goodman,*208 N.C. 416, 181 S.E. 328; *Bank v. McCullers,*211 N.C. 327, 190 S.E. 217; *Washington County v. Land Co.,*222 N.C. 637, 24 S.E. 2d 338; *Ericson v. Ericson,*226 N.C. 474, 38 S.E. 2d 517; *S. v. Jenkins,*234 N.C. 112, 66 S.E. 819; *Smoak v. Newton,*234 N.C. 451, 67 S.E. 2d 462; *Allen v. Allen,*235 N.C. 554, 70 S.E. 2d 505. “We can judicially know only what properly appears on the record,” *Stacy, C. J.,*in *S. v. Lumber Co., supra.*

In the absence of agreement of parties, it is not now deemed expedient to supply the deficiency by reference to records on former appeals.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

Tuesday, May 25, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

                        This meeting will be closed to the public.                              ( print page 28808)    

## Items To Be Discussed

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

* * * * *

# Person To Contact for Information:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer. Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Darlene Harris,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-12345 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTING FIRM**








We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-20403, No. 333-61392 and No. 333-21001) of Titanium Metals
      Corporation of our reports dated February 28, 2007 r elating
      to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.











/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Dallas,
      Texas


February
      28, 2007
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

OMNIBUS AMENDMENT NO.1 TO NOTES 

This Omnibus Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 31, 2016 (this “Amendment”), is made by and among Ivy Science &
Technology Fund, Waddell & Reed Advisors Science & Technology Fund and Ivy Funds VIP Science & Technology (each, a “Lender” and together, the “Lenders”), and Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
(the “Borrower”), with respect to those certain senior secured promissory notes, dated August 20, 2015 (each a “Note”, collectively, the “Notes”) which Borrower has issued to
the Lenders. 
 Each of the parties hereto do hereby agree that Section 5(ix) of the Notes (Minimum Cash Balance) is hereby deleted in its
entirety. 

  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date
first above written. 
  

			
	LENDER:
	
	IVY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY FUND
	By: Ivy Investment Management Company, its Manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Zachary H. Shafran

	Name:	 	Zachary H. Shafran
	Title:	 	SVP
	
	WADDELL & REED ADVISORS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY FUND
	By: Waddell & Reed Investment Management Company, its Manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Zachary H. Shafran

	Name:	 	Zachary H. Shafran
	Title:	 	SVP
	
	IVY FUNDS VIP SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
	By: Waddell & Reed Investment Management Company, its Manager
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Zachary H. Shafran

	Name:	 	Zachary H. Shafran
	Title:	 	SVP
	
	BORROWER:
	
	MARRONE BIO INNOVATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James B. Boyd

	Name:	 	James B. Boyd
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer



  
 S-1
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Hira Azhar v. Mohammad Ali Choudhri

Appel la te case number: 01

- 20

- 00 169

- CV

Trial court case number: 2015

- 36895

Trial court: 312 th District Court of Harris County

Jeff Joyce of Joyce & McFarland LLP has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellee Mohammad Ali Choudhri and a conditional motion to continue case deadlines and reset the upcoming oral argument scheduled in this case for October 19, 2022. Joyce requests withdrawal as counsel for Choudhri because he has been unable to reach suitable financial arrangements with Choudhri regarding payment for the additional briefing and oral argument ordered by this Court on September 1, 2022

. Joyce also requests a continuance, if needed, to accommodate his withdrawal and the transition to new counsel. Although Joyce requested a continuance of the c ase deadline s , he did not include a certificate of conference as required by Rule 10 .1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10 .1(a)(5) (requiring motion “ in civil cases, except for motions for rehearing and en banc reconsideration , contain or be accompanied by a certificate stating that the filing party conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties about the merits of the motion and whether those parties oppose the
motion ”). Accordingly, w e requested a r esponse from appellant Hira Azhar, but no response was filed

. We grant the motion to withdraw

, grant the motion to continue case deadlines, remove the case from this Court’s oral argument docket and from submission on October 19, 2022

, and suspend the supplemental briefing deadlines set by the September
1 order

. Further, w e abate t he appeal to allow Choudhri to secure new counsel

. Choudhri is
ordered to file a motion to reinstate or a status report advising the Court of the status of
his search for new counsel n o later than October 24, 2022

. We reserve the right to reinstate the appeal and reset this case for submission, either on the briefs or for oral argument, upon
the receipt of a status r eport, without regard to whether Choudhri has at that time been able
to secure new counsel , or in the event Choudhri fails to file a status report or motion toreinstate as ordered

. After the case is reinstated on this Court’s active docket, supplemental

b riefing on the issues identified in this Court’s September 1, 2022 order will be due

— on behalf of both Azhar and Choudhri

— within 30 days from the date of reinstatement. After receipt of the supplemental briefing, the Court will determine whether and when to reset this case for submission on the briefs or for oral argument in acc ordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 39.1, 39.7 , 39.8.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Amparo Guerr a

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court *

Date: September 22 , 202 2

*Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Rivas

- Molloy, and Guerra
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2023-6 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofNovember 21, 2023, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2023-6 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the“Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
By: /s/ Randy BockenstedtName: Randy BockenstedtTitle: Senior Vice President, CollectionsDate: March 29, 2024By: /s/ Jonathan WatsonName: Jonathan WatsonTitle: Executive Vice President, TreasurerDate: March 29, 2024**
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2521 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 10:06:03 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2521 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 10:06:03 Page 2 of

3
EXHIBIT A

Notice Parties Service List

Served as set forth below

DESCRIPTION NAME NOTICE NAME ADDRESS EMAIL

METHOD OF

SERVICE

Counsel to Debtors Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Jessica Liou, 

Matthew Goren

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

stephen.karotkin@weil.com

jessica.liou@weil.com

matthew.goren@weil.com

First Class Mail & Email

Counsel to Debtors Keller & Benvenutti LLP Attn: Tobias Keller, Jane Kim

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com

jkim@kellerb envenutti.com First Class Mail & Email

Debtors

PG&E Corporation and 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company Attn: Janet Loduca

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94105 First Class Mail

Office of the United States Trustee Office of the United States Trustee 

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq. & Timothy 

Lafreddi, Esq

450 Golden Gate Avenue

5th Floor, Suite #05-0153

San Francisco, CA 94102

James.L.Snyder@usdoj.gov

timothy.s.laffredi@usdoj.gov

First Class Mail & Email

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Samuel A. 

Khalil

55 Hudson Yards

New York, NY 10001-2163

ddunne@milbank.com

skhalil@milbank.com First Class Mail & Email

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Milbank LLP

Attn: Paul S. Aronzon, Gregory A. 

Bray, Thomas R. Kreller

2029 Century Park E, 33rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Paronzon@milbank.com

Gbray@milbank.com

TKreller@milbank.com First Class Mail & Email

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2521 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 10:06:03 Page 3 of

3
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS

 

The undersignedofficers of AVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifyto their knowledge and in their respective capacities that the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date: May 19, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ ANTHONY S. MARUCCI                        |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Name:  | Anthony S. Marucci                            |
|                    |   | Title: | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |   |   |                                          |
| Date: May 19, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ AVERY W. CATLIN                           |
|                    |   | Name:  | Avery W. Catlin                               |
|                    |   | Title: | Senior Vice President and                     |
|                    |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                       |

 

This certificationshall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act.

 

1

----