alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Earle *A.*Dodson, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on authority of *The*Pfaudler, *etc., Co.*v. *Sargent*(25 Weekly Dig., 483).
#### Joseph Smith, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended  Quarterly  Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Amendment  No. 3 to Form  10-QSB/A  for the period  ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, James A. Hayward,  Principal Financial Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

           (1)    The Report fully  complies with the   requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Applied  DNA  Sciences,  Inc.  and will be  retained by Applied DNA
Sciences,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date:  October 10, 2006                     By: /s/JAMES A HAYWARD
                                               -------------------
                                            James A. Hayward
                                            Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James Hayward,  Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                     /s/ JAMES HAYWARD
                                                     -----------------
                                                     James Hayward
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
                                                     March 2, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James Hayward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                               /s/  JAMES A. HAYWARD
                                               -------------------------
                                               James A. Hayward
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               February 20, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly  Report of Applied DNA  Sciences,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-QSB/A for the period  ending March
31, 2005  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission  on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, James  A.  Hayward,  Chief  Executive   Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the   Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

        (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of  1934; and

        (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all
              material  respects,  the  financial  condition    and   result  of
              operations of the Company.

A signed original of this  written  statement  required by  Section 906 has been
provided to Applied  DNA  Sciences,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by Applied DNA
Sciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange   Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date:  October 10, 2006                   By: /s/JAMES A HAYWARD
                                             -------------------
                                          James A. Hayward
                                          Chief Executive Officer
November 15 , 2011



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01244

- CV V.

CLAUDINE M. ANELLO, BATISTA J. ANELLO AK A BATISTA JOSEPH ANE LLO & CLAUDE JONES COMPA NY, L.L.C., CLAUDE B . ANELLO, REGISTERED AGENT, DEANN RENA LA CROIX, RONALD GENE R OSSI & KATHLEEN

MCIVER AKA KATHLEEN VANKEUREN , Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard appellant = s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on October 1, 2010. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs incurred by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further orde r the mandate be issued immediately.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00435-CR

Andre SCALES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR8106

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED February 19, 2014.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2004, of Commercial Federal Corporation as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2004 (the Report), I, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge, the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commercial
Federal Corporation.



Date: August 4, 2004



By:

/s/ William A. FitzgeraldWilliam A. FitzgeraldChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer/s/ David S. FisherDavid S. FisherExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Commercial Federal Corporation and will be retained by Commercial Federal Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6593
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY ANTOINE SMITH, a/k/a Larry Antoinne Smith, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-7-3-P) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Antoine Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Motion For Reduction of Sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West Supp. 1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith , No. CR-93-7-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Procurement Opportunities

**

----

The Procurement Section of the United States Senate Office of the Sergeant at Arms solicits bids and proposals for goods and services in support of the United States Senate. 

Current procurement opportunities can be reviewed at SAM.gov.  Any interested vendors are encouraged to monitor this list for future opportunities.

        -  Contact 
        -  Content Responsibility 
        -  Usage Policy 
        -  Privacy Policy 
        -  Employment & Internship 
        -            -  Senate Employment Office 
          -  Sergeant at Arms 
          -  Secretary of the Senate 
        -  Procurement 

### Related Links 

Floor Schedule

Sessions of Congress

### Commonly Searched for Legislation 

Find out what issues are actively being discussed in the United States Senate.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

CIVIL DIVISION

JOSEPH H. HUNT

Assistant Attorney General

RUTH A. HARVEY

Director

KIRK MANHARDT

Deputy Director

MATTHEW J. TROY (GABN 717258)

Senior Trial Counsel

P.O. Box 875

Ben Franklin Station

Washington, DC 20044-0875

Telephone: (202) 514-9038

E-mail: matthew.troy@usdoj.gov

DAVID L. ANDERSON (CABN 149604)

United States Attorney

ROBIN M. WALL (CABN 235690)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

COMPANY,

 Debtors.

� Affects PG&E Corporation

� Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

◼ Affects both Debtors

All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case,

No. 19-30088 (DM).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

) 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

 (Jointly Administered)

 Date: June 26, 2019

 Time: 9:30 a.m.

 Place: United States Bankruptcy Court

 450 Golden Gate Avenue

 Courtroom 17

 San Francisco, CA 94102

 Judge: Hon. Dennis Montali

 RE: Docket Nos. 2459 and 2631

 

JOINDER OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN OBJECTION OF THE 

CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCIES TO MOTION OF DEBTORS FOR ENTRY OF 

PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO FED. R. BANKR. P. 7026 AND 9014(c) AND 

11 U.S.C. § 105(a) GOVERNING DISCOVERY MATERIALS AND OTHER 

INFORMATION [DOCKET NO. 2459]

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2639 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 14:15:12 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The United States of America, on behalf of various federal agencies, as both a regulator and 

creditor of the Debtors, hereby joins in the Objection of the California State Agencies to Motion of 

Debtors for Entry of Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7026 and 9014(c) and 11 U.S.C. 

§ 105(a) Governing Discovery Materials and Other Information [Docket No. 2459] (Docket No. 2631) 

(the “Objection”). 

For the reasons set forth in the Objection, the United States objects to the proposed Protective 

Order being made applicable to governmental units and requests that the Court include in any such order 

an express exception that it does not apply to governmental units. 

Date: June 19, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Matthew J. Troy

MATTHEW J. TROY

Senior Trial Counsel

Attorney for United States

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 19, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing JOINDER with the Clerk of the Court 

by using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all CM/ECF participants.

/s/ Matthew J. Troy

Matthew J. Troy

Senior Trial Counsel

Attorney for United States

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2639 Filed: 06/19/19 Entered: 06/19/19 14:15:12 Page 2 of

2
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O . 09

- 19

- 00184

- CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.G. AND A.A.M.

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 253rd District Court Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. CV1814042

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court signed a judgment terminating appellant’s parental rights on

April 1, 2019. On June 21 , 2019, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did

not appear to have been timely filed. The appellant filed a response, in which

appellant stated that she had timely filed a motion for new trial and requested

additional time to file her brief.

Appellant filed notice of appeal on June 17, 2019, more than twenty days from

the date of the judgment and outside the period for which we may grant an extension2 of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 26.3. In an accelerated appeal,

t he f iling of a motion for new trial does not extend the appellate deadlines. See In

the Interest of K.A.F. , 160 S.W.3d 923, 925, 927

- 28 (Tex. 2005); see also Tex. R.

App. P. 26.1(b). This Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we

dismiss the a ppeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice

Submitted on July 24, 2019 Opinion Delivered July 25, 2019

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
EX-35 (i)
(logo) National City
Mortgage

National City Mortgage Co.
A Subsidary of National City Bank of Indiana
3232 Newmark Drive * Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
Telephone: (937) 910-1200

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 1820
Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820

Servicer Compliance Statement

RE: See attached for series (Exhibit A)

I, T. Jackson Case, Jr., hereby certify to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., that I am a
duly elected Executive Vice President of National City Mortgage Co. (the
"Company"), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Ohio and
further as follows:

(i)     A review of the Company's activities as servicer during the immediately
        preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its
        performance under the Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution
        Agreement during such period has been made under such officer's
        supervision, and

(ii)    to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the
        Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and
        any applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects
        throughout such calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) or, if
        there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifically identifying each such failure known to such
        officer and the nature and the status thereof.


National City Mortgage Co.

Certified by:   /s/ T. Jackson Case, Jr.         Date:March 22, 2007
Name:               T. Jackson Case, Jr.
Title:          Executive Vice President

No one Cares More!


(page)

Exhibit A

ARMT 2006-2

BSA 2006-AC3

BSA 2006-AC5

CSMC 2006-3

LUMINENT 2006-7

MASTR 2006-1

MASTR 2006-3

PRIME 2006-1

PRIME 2006-CL1

SAMI 2006-AR3
#### MARY D. DUSENBERRY, Respondent, *v.*HENRY B. DAWSON, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

*Alien*— when *may devise lands*— § 5, *chap.*115 tf/1845.

Under tie provisions of section 5 of chap. 115 of 1845, any resident alien of this State who has purchased and taken a conveyance of real estate within this State, may grant or devise the same, and his grantee or devisee may take and hold the same upon complying with the conditions of said section.

Section 5 is not limited hy the provisions of section 6 of said act, and such grant or devise is valid, even though such grantor or devisor may never have filed the deposition or affirmation required hy the said section 6.

*Goodrich,*v. *Bussell*(42 N. Y., 177) followed.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

The action was brought for a partition of certain lands, and the only question disputed upon the trial and passed upon by the General Term, relates to the validity of a devise of certain real estate made by one Abraham Dawson, deceased, he being an alien resident of this State at the time of acquiring the land, and of making the will by which the same was devised to the plaintiff. The plaintiff insisted that the devise was valid under section 5 of chapter 115 of 1845, and the defendant claims that the devise was void, because the testator had never filed the deposition or affirmation required by section 6 of the said act.

*Wm. II. De*lancey, for the appellant.

*Wm. N.*Noble, for the respondent.

LeaeNbd, P. J.:

The only question is whether the devise to the plaintiff is void by reason of the alienage of Abraham Dawson, a resident of this State.

The express language of section 5 of chapter 115, Laws of 1845, makes the devise valid, unless this section is to be modified by construing it in connection with sections 1 and 6. The appellant *512claims that section 6, which gives power to a resident alien, after filing the required deposition, to grant and devise, is to be construed so as to limit section 5, and that therefore the rights given by section 5 cannot be enjoyed, unless the resident alien has filed the proper deposition.

The contrary, however, was decided in *Goodrich*v. *Russell*(42 N. Y., 177), in respect to section 4. Section 4 is analogous to section 5. The former provides for cases of descent; the latter for cases of grant and devise. The construction given by the highest court of the State to the one section, should, with us, apply also to the other.

It is true that the object of section 6 is not clear. But both sections 4 and 5 omit the requirement of filing a deposition ■by the testator, grantor or intestate, in order that .the devisee, grantee or *quasi*heir may hold the property. And we see no reason to suppose that the legislature intended to make it necessary.

The judgment should be affirmed with costs.

Present — Leakned, P. J., Booees and Boardman, J.J.

Judgment affirmed', with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RONALD WALKER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 131 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Lydia Cole, Appellant, v. Kate C. Brown and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

VV erner, J., not sitting.
Board of Regents’ Meeting Agenda

October 23, 2023 

1. Report of the Chair of the Board and Executive Committee

2. Approval of the Consent Agenda

• June 12, 2023, Meeting Minutes

• Appointments and Reappointments to Smithsonian Institution Advisory Boards

• Amendments to the Bylaws of the Smithsonian American Art Museum Commission

• Amendments to the Bylaws of the Smithsonian National Board

• Amendments to the Bylaws of the Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibition Service and

Smithsonian Affiliations Advisory Board

• Gifts and Naming Recognition 

3. Questions on Written Reports

• Audit and Review Committee

• Finance Committee

• Investment Committee

• Office of Government Relations 

4. Report of the Governance and Nominating Committee

• Proposed Amendments to the Audit and Review Committee Charter

• Appointments and Reappointments to the National Museum of the American Latino Board of 

Trustees

• Emeritus Appointment to the Smithsonian American Art Museum Commission

• Asian Pacific American Center Advisory Board Membership

• Investment Committee Ex Officio Membership

5. Report of the Advancement Committee

• Reputational Risk Guidelines 

6. Report of the Facilities Committee

• Lease Renewal

7. Report of the Secretary

8. Luncheon Program: Artificial Intelligence

9. Strategic Discussion: Collections Care and Space Planning

10. The Semiquincentennial Celebration: America250 and the Smithsonian

11. Executive Session

• 2024 Board Leadership Elections

• “Gatekeeper” Reports

Smithsonian Institution | Board of Regents
Exhibit 32.3

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John E. Balzarini,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:     November 9, 2007

                                                         /s/ John E. Balzarini
                                                         ---------------------
                                                         John E. Balzarini
                                                         Chief Financial Officer