alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the periodic report of NovaRay Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jun S. Yu, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: March 30, 2010   
|                       
|/S/    JUN S.
YU       
|Jun S. Yu              
|Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TRAVIS L. KENYON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2155

[ November 9, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; James W. McCann , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562016CF000347A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance require d for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., L EVINE and K LINGE NSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of RTCA Special Committee 221 meeting: Aircraft Secondary Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held June 15-16, 2010. June 15th from 12 p.m. to 5 p.m., June 16th from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Colson Board Room, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-9434; Web site                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for an RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures meeting. The agenda will include:

Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks      ( print page 29811)    

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 21, 2010.

Meredith Gibbs,

RTCA Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. 2010-12722 Filed 5-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit 10.8

 

English Summary of the Second Amendment dated September 11, 2015 (the “Second Amendment”) by and between Foncière Medicale N°1 (the “Lessor”) and Talend S.A. (the “Tenant”), amending the Lease Agreement dated February 7, 2014 (hereinafter the “Original Lease”) and the Amendment, dated April 14, 2014, to the Original Lease (the “First Amendment”). The parties hereby agree to the following amendments:

 

a.                  Expansion of the leased premises

 

In addition to the premises as referred to in the Original Lease and First Amendment, Tenant rents as from September 15, 2015 the following additional lots:

 

·                  Commercial activities: lot n°11 on the first floor of the building A

·                  ten underground parking spaces

·                  An underground storeroom (lot n°304)

·                  Parking space n°58 in exchange for parking space n°49

 

b.                  Rent and security deposit adjustment

 

Annual rent is increased up to €359,476.51, VAT and charges excluded, as from September 15, 2015.

 

As a consequence, security deposit is increased correlatively to €89,869.13.

 

c.                   Rent-free period

 

Tenant shall benefit from a three-month rent-free period in order to take into account arrangements to the premises.

 

All other clauses and provisions of the Original Lease and First Amendment remain unchanged.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF CONT. PERFECTION 

– GEI CONSULTANTS, INC.

Kirsten A. Worley, Bar No. 222513

kw@wlawcorp.com 

Worley Law, P.C. 

1572 Second Avenue 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: 619-550-1004 

Facsimile: 619-550-1051 

Attorneys for GEI Consultants, Inc. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E Corporation, 

Debtor. 

Tax I.D. No. 94-3234914

Case No. 19-30088-DM 

Chapter 11 

EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF 

PERFECTION OF LIENS OF GEI 

CONSULTANTS, INC. PURSUANT TO 

11 U.S.C. § 546(b) 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 1 of

9
EXHIBIT 1 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1744 Filed: 04/29/19 Entered: 04/29/19 13:43:30 Page 9 of

9
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0971−3 User: admin Date Created: 5/11/2023

Case: 19−30088 Form ID: TRANSC Total: 3

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

aty Lawrence A. Jacobson laj@cohenandjacobson.com

aty Thomas B. Rupp trupp@kbkllp.com

TOTAL: 2

Recipients submitted to the Claims Agent (Kroll Restructuring Administration, LLC):

Steven A. Lamb, ESQ. Rovens Lamb LLP 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 370 Torrance, CA 90505

TOTAL: 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13724-3 Filed: 05/11/23 Entered: 05/11/23 09:57:16 Page 1

of 1
EX-35 (m)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 12, 2007

LARES ASSET SECURITIZATION, INC.
101 California St.
13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2006-7

Per Section 4.02 of the Pooling Agreement, dated as of 12/1/2006, the
undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)     a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
        Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)     to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
        Participant, in all material respects throughout such year or portion
        thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation
        in any material respect, specifying each such failure known to such
        officer and the nature and status thereof.

Certified By:
/s/Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
#### Irving Dembitz, an Infant, by Leopold Dembitz, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Orange County Traction Company, Respondent.

Motion' denied, with ten dollars costs. (See *Lawrence*v. Wilson, 86 App. Div. 472.) Motion for stay denied, without cost's.

Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.
Exhibit 33.2
                                  ------------


          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
Exhibit 32(i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Bradford,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Mark D. Bradford
--------------------

Mark D. Bradford
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 12, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Craig K. Tagawa, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Shared Hospital Services;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; andb) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;] andc) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (or the fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.August 14, 2006       /s/ Craig K. Tagawa     Craig K. Tagawa    Chief Financial Officer  
15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,196
<SECURITIES>                                     1,207
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,500
<INVENTORY>                                     57,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,661
<PP&E>                                         442,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                 216,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 522,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,307
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,523
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   522,936
<SALES>                                        420,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               420,389
<CGS>                                          364,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  379,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6860

AARON M. BURNS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARK, Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 01276

- LO

- TCB )

Submitted : November 21 , 2017 Decided: November 27, 2017

Before WYNN and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Aaron M. Burns, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bin ding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Aaron M. Burns seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appea lability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a pris oner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. S lack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burns has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We den y as moot Burns’ motion to reconsider the order deferring action on his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED