alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                       657
<INVENTORY>                                     16,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,167
<PP&E>                                          47,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,082)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,835
<SALES>                                        299,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               299,749
<CGS>                                          223,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   373
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  8,748
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## SJI Funding Toolkit Provides Answers to Frequently Asked Questions

SJI’s Funding Toolkit for State Courts and Justice System Partners is designed to support local courts, state courts, and their justice system partners as they pursue federal and philanthropic funding opportunities. 

Each week you can find a new FAQ about the grant making process, along with an answer from a grant expert.

Or follow SJI on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn and look for the Q&A icon highlighting the latest posting.  Send your funding and grant questions to fundingtoolkit@sji.gov.  Experts will provide answers, as well as references to additional resources.

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
*Exhibit 32(b)***Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**     I, Michael A. Weisbarth, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of LESCO, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September30, 2006, which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Michael A. Weisbarth Michael A. Weisbarth
Exhibit32.1

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section1350(A) And (B))

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a)and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as anofficer of Metaldyne Corporation (the"Company") that the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2005 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periodscovered by such Report.

|                   |  |        |  |                                                                    |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|-------------------|--|--------|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| Date:May 18, 2005 |  |   |  | /s/ Timothy D.Leuliette                                            |
|              |  |   |  | TimothyD. Leuliette Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|                   |

----
CLAIMANTS: Shane Steven Ronayne 

PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Case # 19-30088-DM

September 30, 2022

To Whom It May Concern:

I am requesting your consideration in approving my late claim to the Bankruptcy Court for 

damages I suffered from the 2017 Tubbs Fire. I am aware that the court has accepted other late 

filings and would hope the court would accept mine. I feel there would be no prejudice to PGE,

nor cause difficulties to the judicial process by my late filing.

My late filing is because I didn’t receive notification from the Bankruptcy Court, or a

representative of PGE, that I might be eligible to file a claim. Had I known I was eligible to file a

claim, I would have. Another fire victim recently told me I was eligible to file a claim. I then filed. 

Respectfully,

Shane Steven Ronayne 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13031 Filed: 09/30/22 Entered: 10/03/22 09:51:06 Page 1

of 1
#### BETHLEHEM STEEL AND IRON COMPANY, Incorporated, v. JERRY LINER-JUNALUSKA SUPPLY COMPANY.

(Filed 15 June, 1932.)

Bills and Notes H c — Evidence held to establish prima facie ownership of note by plaintiff.

Where the plaintiff in an action on a note introduces evidence that the note was negotiable, duly endorsed by the payee and held by the plaintiff, the evidence is sufficient to establish prima facie ownership of the note by the plaintiff, and the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence is properly overruled.

Appeal by defendant from *SinJc, J.,*at February Term, 1932, of BuNcombe.

Civil action to recover on defendant’s promissory note of $1,200, given to Ohandlee Steel and Iron Company, endorsed by said payee and delivered to the plaintiff for value.

*11From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the General County Court of Buncombe County, the defendant appealed to the Superior Court where the judgment of the county court was affirmed.

Defendant appeals, assigning errors.

*Bourne, Parker, Arledge & DuBose for plaintiff.*

*Joseph W. Little, for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

The only question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to establish plaintiff’s ownership of the note in suit, which was admittedly executed by the defendant and delivered to Chandlee Steel and Iron Company, the payee named therein. The evidence shows that the note is negotiable, duly endorsed by the payee, and held by the plaintiff. This made out a prima facie case. *Bank v. Rochamora,*193 N. C., 1, 136 S. E., 259; *Clark v. Laurel Park Estates,*196 N. C., 624, 146 S. E., 584.

Moreover, if it be conceded that plaintiff took the note in question after maturity, no equities are pleaded, hence the only question is one of fact, the plaintiff’s alleged ownership of the note. The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICOA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date  November 11, 2005                   By:          /s/ Stephen N. Cummings
                                                       -----------------------
                                          Name:        Stephen N. Cummings
                                          Title:       Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided Sherb & co., LP and will be
retained by ICOA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-110779, Form S-4 No. 333-102115), and in the related
Prospectuses, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 333-106607),
pertaining to the 1996 Employee, Director, and Consultant Stock Option Plan of
CardioTech International Inc. of our report dated June 4, 2004, except for Note
R as to which the date is June 21, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of CardioTech International Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.


                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
June 21, 2004
#### Olaf Peter Nielsen v. United States Rolling Stock Company.

*Sales—Balance due—Recovery of—Failure to Credit.*

In an action brought to recover a balance claimed to be due for goods sold and delivered, the defendant having produced receipts showing payment for two of the items of plaintiff’s account, it is *held:*That in the absence of any evidence in explanation of the giving of such receipts, the plaintiff was not entitled to judgment for such items.

[Opinion filed November 11, 1890.]

In error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Blanks & Chytraus, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. E. C. Ferguson & Goodnow, for defendant in error.

Waterman, J.

This was an action of assumpsit. The United States Rolling Stock Company sued for goods sold and delivered, and gave in evidence an account showing a balance due the company of $428.61. Plaintiff’s attorney testified that Nielsen had admitted this to he correct, and promised to pay the same.

In this account, under date of January 31st is the item, “ To our bill §206.82,” and under date of February 28th is the item “ To our bill §201.98.”

*284Nielsen testified, denying that he had ever admitted the correctness of the account or promised ' to pay it, saying he told plaintiff’s attorney that there was some mistake, and he would look over his receipts and go and see him. Nielsen also produced a bill made by the Bolling Stock Company, containing two items : One for coal January 26tli, and one for coal January 14th, amounting to $206.82; and another bill by the company containing three items under date of March 2d, amounting to $201.98.

Each of these bills were marked *“*Paid April 8, 1887. P. Shepherd, cashier.”

Nielsen testified that he paid these bills to the company. It was admitted that April 8th Mr. Shepherd was the cashier of the company, and his signature was not disputed.

In the credits given by the company to Nielson as stated upon the account presented to Nielson and that produced in court, no credit for either of these amounts appear, nor are there credits from which it can reasonably be made to appear that such payments are included in other items. There then was very strong evidence that Nielson had paid the company $408.70, for which he had received no credit.

It seems to us that this evidence required the company to explain the receipts it had given, or show why Nielson should not be allowed credit for these payments of $206.82 and $201.98, and that in the absence of such evidence Nielson must be credited in the account with these payments. This we think it entirely fails to do, and in the absence of such explanation appearing in the record, this judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. Paslee v. Glass, 61 Ill. 94.

*Reversed <md remanded.*
EXHIBIT 32.3

                        FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, J.
Duncan Smith, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



May 14, 2004                                         /s/ J. Duncan Smith
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     J. Duncan Smith
                                                     Treasurer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT TO THE TAUBMAN COMPANY LLC
2008 OMNIBUS LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective as of May 21, 2010)


The Taubman Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”) has adopted and maintains The Taubman Company LLC 2008 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, originally effective May 29, 2008, and as amended and restated effective as of May 21, 2010 (the “Plan”).
Pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended from time to time by action of the Board of Directors of Taubman Centers, Inc. (the “Board”).
The Board has previously delegated to the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) the Board’s right to amend the Plan.
The Compensation Committee, acting as the delegate of the Board, desires to amend the Plan to modify (narrow) the provisions relating to the award of TRG Units under the Plan.  Accordingly, the Company, acting through the Compensation Committee, amends the Plan effective June 1, 2016, as follows:
1.Section 2.47 (TRG Unit) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


“2.47 ‘TRG Unit’ means, effective for Awards made on and after March 1, 2016, a ‘Profits Unit’ as defined and to the extent authorized under The Third Amendment and Restatement of Agreement of Limited Partnership of The Taubman Realty Group Limited Partnership, dated December 12, 2012, as thereafter amended from time to time, and is intended to constitute a “profits interest” within the meaning of the Code.  For Awards made prior to March 1, 2016, ‘TRG Unit’ means a unit of limited partnership in TRG.”
2.Section 10 (Terms and Conditions of Restricted Shares, Restricted Share Units, Restricted TRG Units and Restricted TRG Unit Units) is amended by the addition of a new Section 10.8 at the end thereof, reading as follows:


“10.8  TRG Unit Awards On and After March 1, 2016.  Awards of TRG Units on and after March 1, 2016 may only be issued to a Participant for the performance of services to or for the benefit of the Company and/or TRG (i) in the Participant’s capacity as a partner of TRG, (ii) in anticipation of the Participant becoming a partner of TRG, or (iii) as otherwise determined by the Committee, provided that the TRG Units are intended to constitute “profits interests” within the meaning of the Code, including, to the extent applicable, Internal Revenue Service Revenue Procedure 93-27 and Internal Revenue Service Procedure 2001-43.”
The Compensation Committee, acting as the delegate of the Board, has caused this Amendment to The Taubman Company 2008 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan to be executed by its duly authorized representative this 1st day of June, 2016.





















The Taubman Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 


By: The Taubman Realty Group Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, managing member


		
	By:
	Taubman Centers, Inc., a Michigan corporation, managing partner




            By:       /s/ Chris B. Heaphy                                                                   
Chris B, Heaphy, Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,083
<PP&E>                                           3,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,546
<COMMON>                                         2,373
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,533)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,712
<SALES>                                          7,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,859
<CGS>                                            3,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (27)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    483
<INCOME-TAX>                                        48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (29)
<NET-INCOME>                                       406
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.02


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          44,145                   3,220
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,722                     137
<ALLOWANCES>                                       819                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,705                   3,411
<PP&E>                                           7,929                   1,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,727                     263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,250                   7,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,189                   3,338
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                            29                       2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                  16,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,660                 (12,494)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,250                   7,482
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,278                   1,820
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,182                     208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,589                  15,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76                      58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (58,336)                (13,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (58,336)                (13,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (58,336)                (13,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (7.98)                 (10.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (7.98)                 (10.35)
        

</TABLE>