alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745379
<NAME> KENAN TRANSPORT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,692
<PP&E>                                          76,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,716
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,096
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,901
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,429
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,633
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

           I, Gerhard H. Wehr, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Applied
     DNA Sciences, Inc. ; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
     any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
     which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
     covered by this report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
    flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
    report;

          4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
    prepared;

          (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238];

          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
    the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
    of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
    control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
    recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
    an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

          5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
    based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
    reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
    registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
    functions):

             (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
       design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
       are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
       record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

             (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
       other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       control over financial reporting.

/s/Gerhard H. Wehr
  -----------------
   Gerhard H. Wehr
   Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 21, 2004
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 1 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 2 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 3 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 4 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 5 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 6 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 7 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 8 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2345    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:21:59    Page 9 of9
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4901

DESMOND SENTELL DAILEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.

Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge.

(CR-00-42)

Submitted: June 26, 2002

Decided: August 23, 2002

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Haakon Thorsen, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen

C. F. Shappert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Desmond Dailey appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed

following his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess with

intent to distribute crack cocaine and one count of possession with

intent to distribute crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a)(1), 846

(West 1999 & Supp. 2002). Dailey claims that the Government

breached an oral plea agreement by failing to administer a polygraph

test to confirm his limited role in the conspiracy. 

Because he did not object below, Dailey’s claim is reviewed for

plain error only. United States v. McQueen, 108 F.3d 64, 65-66 (4th

Cir. 1997). Although not favored, oral plea agreements are enforceable. United States v. Iaquinta, 719 F.2d 83, 84 n.2 (4th Cir. 1983).

A government promise that is part of the inducement for a guilty plea

must be fulfilled. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971).

The government’s breach of such a promise violates due process.

United States v. Martin, 25 F.3d 211, 217 (4th Cir. 1994). The interpretation of a plea agreement is "guided by contract law, and parties

to the agreement should receive the benefit of their bargain."

McQueen, 108 F.3d at 66. In McQueen, the transcript of the guilty

plea hearing established that the government had made an oral promise to recommend that the defendant receive a sentence of no more

than 63 months and to recommend that he receive a two-level adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. At sentencing, the government

failed to mention the terms of the oral plea agreement. We found that

the government’s breach constituted plain error requiring that McQueen’s sentence be vacated and the case remanded for specific performance of the agreement. Id. at 65. 

Here, by contrast, we find no evidence in the record to support Dailey’s claim that his guilty plea was induced by the Government’s

promise to administer a polygraph. Although a polygraph examination was mentioned at Dailey’s sentencing hearing, it was not in the

context of an agreement or promise to induce his guilty plea. Accordingly, we conclude that Dailey cannot show a breach of any plea

agreement and therefore affirm his sentence. We dispense with oral

2 UNITED STATES v. DAILEY
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES v. DAILEY 3
#### EDWARD P. GILKEY v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE et al.

(Filed 2 July, 1930.)

(See *Reynolds v. Asheville, ante,*212.)

Appeal by defendants from *Sink, Special Judge,*at April Term, 1930, of BuNCOmbe.

Civil action to restrain the collection of an alleged illegal tax.

Judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal.

*Alfred S. Barnard for plaintiff.*

*George Pennell, Charles N. Malone and Charles E. Jones for defendants.*

Stacy, C. J.

This is a companion case to *Reynolds v. Asheville, ante,*212, and is controlled by what was said in that case, the similarity of the fact situations in the two cases being such as to call for no dis-tinguishment or further discussion. The legal questions involved are the same.

*219We are not unmindful of the apparent equity of appellants’ position, considering the burdens assumed and benefits conferred by the extension ■of the city limits, but this is a matter which the Legislature is presumed to have considered, and the law is as it is written.

Affirmed.

ClaeksoN, J., dissents.
CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The
      Board
      of Directors


Sugar
      Creek Financial Corp.





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
      333-142098) on Form S-8 of Sugar Creek Financial Corp. of our report dated
      June
      20, 2008 of Sugar Creek Financial Corp., which appears in this Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K.





/s/
            Michael
                Trokey & Company, P.C.Certified
                Public Accountants





June
      26,
      2008


St.
      Louis, Missouri
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of ICOA, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  August 19, 2003             By: /s/ Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.
                                       -----------------------
                                           Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.,
                                           Chief Financial Officer,  Secretary,
                                           Treasurer and Director (Principal
                                           Accounting Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

LORENCE WOODWARD , Appellant,

v.

ORATOR E. WOODWARD, individually and as trustee of THE MARY T. WOODWARD TRUST OF 1972

, SERENA WOODWARD TRUST OF 2002 , and THE EL BRAVO TRUST OF 2002 ,
a nd SERENA WOODWARD

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 20

- 2105

[ July 22, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Dina Keever

- Agrama , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2012

- CP

001748

- XXXX

- NB

.
Lisa Paige Glass of Glass Law Office, P.A ., Boca Raton, for appellant.

David L. Gorman of David L. Gorman, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellee Orator E. Woodward.

Theodore S. Kypreos of Jones Foster P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Serena Woodward.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , C.J., W ARNER and G ROSS , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1198 CA 16-00394 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

DENNIS H. KINDRED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

SARAH COLBY AND MONROE COUNTY FAIR & RECREATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

NASH CONNORS, P.C., BUFFALO (MATTHEW LOUISOS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BARCLAY DAMON, LLP, ROCHESTER (MARK T. WHITFORD, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered May 19, 2015. The order granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30289

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

BENNIE RAY CAIN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-50047

_________________________________________________________________

April 11, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bennie Cain appeals his conviction and sentence for

possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. His claim that he is

entitled to reversal on grounds that this conviction is legally

inconsistent with his acquittal of having made false statements

to obtain the firearm has no merit. See United States v. Parks,

68 F.3d 860, 865 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct 825

(1996). Nor is there any merit to Cain’s contention that he is
2

entitled to reversal on grounds of entrapment by estoppel. See

United States v. Trevino-Martinez, 86 F.3d 65,69 (5th Cir. 1996),

cert. denied, 1997 WL 85480 (Mar. 3, 1997); United States v.

Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc)(plain

error), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).

Cain’s claim that the district court should have granted him

a downward departure in sentencing him, pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 5K2.0, p.s., will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See

United States v. Flanagan, 87 F.3d 121, 125 (5th Cir. 1996);

United States v. DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 477-78 (5th Cir. 1995).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT



TO SECTION 960 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund IV (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission



|                      |  |                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Daniel Stephenson             
|                      |  | Daniel Stephenson, General Partner
|                      |  | Rancon Realty Fund IV
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJanuary 25, 2023, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1 and Citibank, N.A. (the “Agreement”) during the periodthat is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
By: 
/s/ Randy Bockenstedt
Name: Randy BockenstedtTitle: Senior Vice President, CollectionsDate: March 29, 2024By: 
/s/ Jonathan Watson
Name: Jonathan WatsonTitle: Executive Vice President, TreasurerDate: March 29, 2024
 
**
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5019 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5019

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, as the ``Specialist 
                 Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31.1 / 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Gary Campbell, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Cytta Corp.  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have;  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date:  January 17, 2014 /s/ Gary Campbell Gary Campbell Principal Executive and Financial Officer      1     2