alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ROBERT ELLIOTT, Respondent, *v.*BENJAMIN G. LEWIS, Appellant.

*Consent to refer*— *when general —party objecting to a reference must appeal from, the order directing it*— *he eannot claim that the referee has no jurisdiction;*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of a referee in an action of ejectment.

The action was brought to recover a strip of land, about twenty-six feet in width and one chain in length, situate in the village of Central Square, in the town of Hastings, Oswego county. The case has been at the Geuei’al Term once before, on an appeal from a judgment, rendered in favor of the defendant, which was reversed by this court, and is reported in 10 Hun, at page 486.

The General Term, after holding that there was no reason to vary or depart from its former decision, said: “It seems that when the judgment was reversed, before a new trial was ordered before another referee, it probably did not occur to the court, if such was in truth the fact, that the consent to the original reference was not generally that the cause might be referred to a referee, but that the consent was only that the cause might be referred to the particular referee named in the first order of reference. It appears, however, that under the order of the General Term, made on the reversal of the first judgment, a motion was made at a Special Term by the jalaintiff to substitute a new referee to hear the said cause, which motion was opposed by the said defendant; but, nevertheless, was granted, and the action was referred to the second referee to hear, try and deter*582mine. When the trial came on the defendant’s counsel objected to proceeding, on the ground that the court had no right to refer the case, and that the defendant was entitled to a trial by a jury-The objection was overruled and the trial proceeded, the defendant appearing and introducing witnesses, etc. ; but the defendant now takes the objection on this appeal that the referee had no jurisdiction to proceed to the trial of the cause.

It does not appear that the original consent to a reference was confined to the particular referee named, nor but that it was a general consent that the action might be referred. But, however, that may be, we do not think the defendant could object on the trial on this ground. The order of reference to the second referee was made on due notice, and so far as appears was never appealed from, and we think that so long as that order was not appealed from the defendant was bound by it. Under certain circumstances the court had authority to make such an order, and when so made, on notice, the reference was to be deemed prtiper and regular until the order making it should be reversed. The cases cited by the defendant on this subject are where the appeal was taken from the *order of reference,*as in *Preston*v. *Morrow et at*(66 N. Y,, 452). In this case the appeal is from the judgment only. (See Code of Civil Procedure, § 1301-1316.)

*B. G. Lewis,*appellant in person. *Randall*& *Randall,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Talcott, P. J.

• Smith, J., concurred.

HakdiN, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 21
 NAME
    
    JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATIONSS&C Technologies New Jersey, Inc.
    
    New JerseyFinancial Models Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareFinancial Models Company Ltd.
    
    New YorkSS&C Fund Administration Services LLC
    
    New YorkOMR Systems International, Ltd.
    
    New JerseyFinancial Interactive, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaOpen Information Systems, Inc.
    
    ConnecticutCogent Management Inc.
    
    New YorkSS&C Technologies Canada Corp.
    
    Nova ScotiaFinancial Models Corporation Limited
    
    United KingdomFMC Global Investments Limited
    
    BarbadosSS&C Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
    
    AustraliaSS&C Technologies Limited
    
    United KingdomSS&C Technologies Sdn. Bhd.
    
    MalaysiaSS&C Technologies, KK
    
    JapanSS&C Technologies B.V.
    
    NetherlandsSS&C Technologies (s) Pte Ltd
    
    SingaporeSS&C Fund Services N.V.
    
    Netherlands AntillesSS&C Fund Services (B.V.I.) Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsHC Investments Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsSS&C (Bahamas) Ltd.
    
    BahamasSS&C Technologies Ireland Ltd.
    
    IrelandSS&C Technologies Connecticut, LLC
    
    ConnecticutTheNextRound, Inc.
    
    MassachusettsTheNextRound, Inc.  EAFE, Ltd.
    
    MassachusettsTradeware Global Corp.
    
    DelawareTradeware Global LLC
    
    DelawareTradeware Global Holdings LLC
    
    DelawareTradeware
Global UK Limited
    
    United Kingdom
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

s0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141583

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141583 COA: 297011 Macomb CC: 2 000-001089-FC SAMUEL THOMAS LUCERO, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 30, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CombiMatrix Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Amit Kumar, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/s/ AMIT KUMAR, PH.D. Amit Kumar, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)March 20, 2009


---



QuickLinks
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ChildFirst Services, Inc., :

Petitioner :

:

v. :

:

Department of Human Services, : No. 681 C.D. 2021

Respondent :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 8

th day of June, 2022, it is ORDERED that the

above-captioned opinion filed March 29, 2022, shall be designated OPINION 

rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

________________________________

ANNE E. COVEY, Judge
EX-35 (b)
(logo)AVELO
MORTGAGE

Avelo Mortgage,

Annual Compliance Statement

Re: The Flow Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
among Goldman Sachs Morteage Company and Avelo Mortgage, LLC and GreenPoint
Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-OH1

1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Ave1o") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from February 24, 2006 through December 31, 2006. This review was completed
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

For a period of time in 2006, bank accounts were not reconciled in strict
compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Reg AB which provides as follows:

* Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed
securities, related bank accounts, including custodial accounts and related bank
clearing accounts. These reconciliations are (A) mathematically accurate; (B)
prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date, or such
other number of days specified in the transaction agreements; (C) reviewed and
approved by someone other than the person who prepared the reconciliation; and
(D) contain explanations for reconciling items. These reconciling items are
resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification, or such other
number of days specified in the transaction agreements.

The bank account reconciliations were current as of December 31, 2006, and no
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.

/s/ James Weston Moffett
Name: James Weston Moffett
Title: President and CEO
Date: February 28, 2007

600 E. Las Colinas Blvd. Suite 620 Irving, TX 75039 972.910.7000
F. 972.910.7099
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
     The financial data schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from the form 10-Q of Howell Corporation for the six months
     ended June 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
     to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1000

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>               Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                            396
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                    7061
<ALLOWANCES>                      161
<INVENTORY>                        40
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                10858
<PP&E>                         401586
<DEPRECIATION>                 311748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 120357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           10392
<BONDS>                         82906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                       690
<COMMON>                         5472
<OTHER-SE>                      19722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   120357
<SALES>                         20060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                20060
<CGS>                           14374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   14374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               3998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (984)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (306)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (678)
<DISCONTINUED>                   1336
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                      658
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 1of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 2of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 3of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 4of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 5of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 6of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 7of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 8of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 9of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 10of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 11of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 12of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 13of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 14of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 15of 16

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2390-3    Filed: 06/05/19    Entered: 06/05/19 10:39:42    Page 16of 16
---

Exhibit 32(a)





Certification of


Chief Executive Officer


Of 99¢ Only Stores




This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the period ended March 28, 2009 of 99¢ Only Stores (the "Issuer").





I, Eric Schiffer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





Dated: June 10, 2009








By:  /s/ Eric Schiffer


Name:  Eric Schiffer


Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### Meyer Jonasson, Appellant, v. Edward E. Eames and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinions by

Lawrence, J., and Van Brunt, P. J.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court

of the State of New York

Third Judicial Department

I, Robert D. Mayberger, Clerk of the Appellate Division of 

the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Judicial 

Department, do hereby certify that

Frank Thomas More Catalina

was duly licensed and admitted to practice as an Attorney and 

Counselor at Law in all the courts of this State on March 31, 2010, 

has duly taken and subscribed the oath of office prescribed by law, 

has been enrolled in the Roll of Attorneys and Counselors at Law 

on file in this office, is duly registered with the Administration

Office of the Courts, and according to the records of this Court is 

currently in good standing as an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law.

In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set 

my hand in the City of Albany on 

September 15, 2022.

Clerk of the Court

CertID-00083083

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 12964-1 Filed: 09/15/22 Entered: 09/15/22 14:49:04 Page 1

of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CardioTech International, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Szycher, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |  | /s/Michael SzycherMichael Szycher,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|-------------------- |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2005 |  |  |                                                                        

---



QuickLinks
H. R. 5062 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to specify that privilege 

and confidentiality are maintained when information is shared by certain nondepository covered persons with Federal and State financial regulators, and for 

other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Examination and Supervisory 

Privilege Parity Act of 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. PRIVILEGE OF INFORMATION SHARED BY CERTAIN NONDEPOSITORY COVERED PERSONS. 

Section 1024(b)(3) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act 

of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5514(b)(3)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘regulators and the State bank regulatory 

authorities’’ and inserting ‘‘regulators, the State bank regulatory authorities, and the State agencies that licence, supervise, or examine the offering of consumer financial products 

or services’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The sharing of 

information with such regulators, authorities, and agencies 

shall not be construed as waiving, destroying, or otherwise 

affecting any privilege or confidentiality such person may claim 

with respect to such information under Federal or State law 

as to any person or entity other than such Bureau, agency, 

supervisor, or authority.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10587 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

− Appellee ,

v ersus
BRIAN ANTHONY ADAMS , Defendant

− Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:16

- CR

- 246

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Brian Adams has

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 15, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10587 Document: 00514795227 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2019No. 18

- 10587

2 moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Adams h a s not filed a response. We have revi ewed counsel’s brief and the rel

e vant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

T here is a clerical error in the judgment. See F ED

. R. C RIM

. P . 36. Specific ally, as to the conviction of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime , the judg ment mistakenly referred to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(C)(i) as the applicable statute instead of the correct statute, § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). Subsection (c)(1 )(C)(i) provides for a 25

- year mandatory minimum sentence for a second or subsequent § 924(c) offense, while § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) provides for a five

- year mandatory minim um. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from fur ther responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for the limited purpose of correction of the clerical error to reflect that Adams was sentenced under § 924(c)(1)(A)(i)

. See F ED

. R. C RIM

. P . 36. Case: 18-10587 Document: 00514795227 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/15/2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3310-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-3310-EM), dated March 19, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         April 26, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective April 26, 2010.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-13047 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of ICOA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date:  May 16, 2006                              By: /s/ Richard Schiffmann
                                                         -----------------------
                                               Name:     Richard Schiffmann
                                              Title:     Chief Executive Officer





         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided Sherb & Co., LP and
will be retained by ICOA, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.