alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-15-00591-CV

Compacta Construction, Inc. 

v.

Larg Management Group LLC

NO. 2015-22315 IN THE 215TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

MT FEE

RPT RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

$10.00

$144.00

$10.00

$137.00

$20.00

$175.00

08/26/2015

08/14/2015

08/07/2015

07/20/2015

07/15/2015

07/15/2015

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

UNKNOWN

PAID

PAID

ANT

ANT

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$496.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this November 23, 2015.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2960-4    Filed: 07/12/19    Entered: 07/12/19 16:28:33    Page 1of 2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2960-4    Filed: 07/12/19    Entered: 07/12/19 16:28:33    Page 2of 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1781 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 14:06:13 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1781 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 14:06:13 Page 2 of

2
#### WILLIAM B. REID, Administrator, v. LEWIS SUSTAR et al.

(Filed 1 May, 1935.)

Negligence A c — Doctrine of attractive nuisance held not to warrant recovery for intestate’s death under evidence in this case.

Evidence that plaintiff’s intestate, a thirteen-year-old boy, went to defendant’s com mill to return an implement, or take some corn to be ground, and that while there he engaged in a friendly fight with boys in the mill, wrestling and throwing corncobs, and that intestate, contrary to repeated warnings given by defendant to boys around the mill, went into the engine room, while defendant was not looking, to get more corncobs for the fight, and there came in contact with revolving machinery resulting in injury causing his death, *is held*insufficient to resist defendant’s motion as of nonsuit.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Clement, J.,*at February Term, 1935, of MeOKLENBPRG.

*204Civil action to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of the defendants.

The facts are these: On 20 November, 1931, plaintiff’s intestate, a Negro 'boy, thirteen years of age, went to the corn mill operated by the defendants, either to return a scoop or shovel, which belonged to the mill, or to take some corn to be ground, or both. While there, he and three other Negro boys began playing, wrestling, and throwing corncobs at each other. ’Twas a friendly battle with corncobs. The operator of the mill frequently warned the boys to stay out of the engine room where there was a large pile of corncobs. Contrary to such warning, when the miller was not looking, plaintiff’s intestate ran into the engine room to get more cobs, to be used in the juvenile war, and in reaching for them over a revolving shaft, his clothing caught on the shaft and he was thrown around it and severely injured, from which he later died.

Judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, from which he appeals, assigning errors.

*G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Ervin for plaintiff.*

*Stewart & Bobbitt and James 0. Moore for defendants.*

Staoy, C. J.,

after stating the case: It is not perceived upon what theory plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendants in this case. *Briscoe v. Light & Power Co.,*148 N. C., 396, 62 S. E., 600. The judgment of nonsuit is correct. *Boyd v. R. R.,*207 N. C., 390.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Ada M. Morse, Respondent, to Alter a Highway in the Towns of Monroe and Chester, and the Assessment of Damages Therefor. Town of Chester, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.. No opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas and.Carr, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit
32.1





COPSYNC,
INC.





CERTIFICATION
OF CORPORATE OFFICERS


(Furnished
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of COPsync,
Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





The Company's Amendment No. 2 to
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.






Date:
      June 4, 2009
                By:
                /s/ RUSSELL
      CHANEYRussell
      ChaneyChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





The
forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
906 CERTIFICATION
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Applied DNA
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Larry Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                    /s/ Larry Lee
                                        Larry Lee

Date: August 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 32(i)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Bradford,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Mark D. Bradford
--------------------

Mark D. Bradford
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 14, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DEBORAH ANNE KEELEY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 143 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of Volcan Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Pnina
Feldman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350),
that to her knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









October
      29, 2009





/s/
      Pnina FeldmanPnina
      Feldman
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6346

RAYMONT TASCO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-02-339-02)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymont Tasco, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymont Tasco seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised Tasco that failure to file timely

objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of

a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this

warning, Tasco failed to object to the magistrate judge’s

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Tasco has waived appellate

review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 10.13**

 

**Performance Goals for the**

**Cadmus FY 2005-2007 Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan and**

**Cadmus FY 2005-2007 ManagementLong-Term Incentive Plan**

**(as established November 10, 2004)**

 

The Annual EPS Goal for a Fiscal Year under the LTIPs is a stated earnings per share amount for that fiscal year (Base Annual EPS), whichmay be set separately for each vesting level, with the levels of vesting driven by the Base Annual EPS before recognition of Stock Plan compensation expense (the Annual EPS Goals) as determined pursuant to generally accepted accounting principlesfor the Company’s financial accounting reporting purposes. EPS is the Company’s earnings per share from continuing operations which exclude (i) the effect of discontinued operations and dispositions of business segments, (ii) materialextraordinary items that are both unusual and infrequent, and (iii) changes in accounting principles. Stock Plan compensation expense is the financial accounting expense associated with the 2004 Employee Plan (including both LTIPs) and theCompany’s 2004 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan. 

 

The AnnualShare Price Goal for a fiscal year is the fair market value of a share being equal to or greater than a stated amount at any time during the three calendar months following the end of that fiscal year. The Base Price relates to the fair market valueof a share on the date on which a change in control occurs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KAYENTA KREATIONS, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,067
<PP&E>                                          12,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              779
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,019
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,164
<SALES>                                            282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   282
<CGS>                                              154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    16
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,842)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,842)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit32.2

Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section1350(A) And (B))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(a) and (b)), theundersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of MetaldyneCorporation (the "Company") that theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedOctober 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.

|  | /s/ Jeffrey M. StafeilJeffrey M.Stafeil Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Chief Accounting Officer and Authorized Signatory) |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date:November 17, 2004

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Alpine County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold a meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on June 15th, and will begin at 6 p.m. The meeting will be held in Alpine County at the Alpine Early Learning Center, 100 Foothill Road, Markleeville, CA 96120.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Daniel Morris, RAC Coordinator, USDA, Hurnboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Carson Ranger District, 1536 S. Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701 (775) 884-8140; E-Mail                         *danielmorris@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Update on recommended projects (2) Determine parameters and timeframes for next round of projects (3) Discuss Charter Renewal (4) Public Comment. The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: May 21, 2010.

Genny E. Wilson,

Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-12864 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32


                             REX Stores Corporation
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned officers of REX Stores Corporation (the "Company")
hereby certify, to their knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2005, which this certificate accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Stuart A. Rose
Stuart A. Rose


/s/ Douglas L. Bruggeman
Douglas L. Bruggeman


Dated: December 8, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

JMP GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of JMP
Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas B. Kilian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 14, 2009 |  | /S/    THOMAS B.
KILIAN
|                   |  | Thomas B. Kilian       
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Charles E. Fizette v. Julia Fizette.

*Jurisdiction—Freeholds.*

This court has no jurisdiction of controversies involving freeholds.

[Opinion filed January 16, 1891.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

Mr. George W. Warvelle, for appellant.

Mr. Benjamin F. Richolson, for, appellee.

Waterman, J.

In this case there was a decree divesting appellant of his homestead right in land to certain premises in the city of Chicago; from this decree he appeals.

A homestead is a freehold, and the right thereto being involved in this case, this court is without jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Magoon v. Magoon, 15 Ill. App. 629; Snell v. Snell, 123 Ill. 403.

*Appeal dismissed.*