alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



GLOBE SPECIALTY METALS,
INC.

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Joseph Ragan, certify
that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this
    amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K of Globe Specialty Metals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
    “registrant”); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: October 28, 2015 | By: | /s/ Joseph Ragan              | 
|---------------------- | --- | ----------------------------- | 
|                       |     | Joseph Ragan                  | 
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer       | 
|                       |     | (Principal Financial Officer) |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Amador County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Amador County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Jackson, California. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose of the meeting is to develop committee operating guidelines, 
discuss guidelines for submitting projects, and set the dates for the 
next meetings.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 9, 2010 at 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 10877 Conductor Blvd., Sutter 
Creek, CA, June 9, 2010, 6 p.m.
    Written comments should be sent to Frank Mosbacher; Forest 
Supervisor's Office; 100 Forni Road; Placerville, CA 95667. Comments 
may also be sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2c4cfcdd1c0c3c1cac7d0e2c4d18cc4c7c68cd7d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e2823213d2c2f2d262b3c0e283d60282b2a603b3d">[email protected]</span></a>, or via facsimile 
to 530-621-5297.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at 100 Forni Road, 
Placerville, CA 95667. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 530-
622-5061 to facilitate entry into the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Mosbacher, Public Affairs 
Officer, Eldorado National Forest Supervisors Office, (530) 621-5268.
    Individuals who use Telecommunication Devices for the Deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: At that meeting, the RAC will 
work on the operating guidelines for the committee and start discussing 
guidelines for submitting project proposal. The committee will also set 
future meeting dates. More information will be posted on the Eldorado 
National Forest Web site at www.fs.fed.us/r5/eldorado. A public comment 
opportunity will be made available following the business activity. 
Future meetings will have a formal public input period for those 
following the yet to-be-developed public input process.

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
Duane A. Nelson,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-12277 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4914 

To prohibit funding to the Institute of Peace. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2014 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit funding to the Institute of Peace. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING THE INSTITUTE OF 

4 PEACE. 

5 No funds available to the Department of State or any 

6 other department or agency may be used to provide con7 tributions directly or indirectly to the Institute of Peace. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roderick C. Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Roderick C Bartlett Roderick C Bartlett Chief Financial Officer Date: February 23, 2015
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5019 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2014 

Ms. SLAUGHTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Roch7 ester, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5019 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Theodore 

5 Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2952

___________ In re: Trism, Inc., * * Debtor * ___________________ * * Trustees of the Trism Liquidating * Trust, * Appeal from the United States * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Appellant, * * [UNPUBLISHED] v. * * Internal Revenue Service, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 13, 2005 Filed: April 21, 2005

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, FAGG and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Trism, Inc., an interstate trucking company, filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) filed a claim for unpaid assessments on Trism’s operation of heavy motor vehicles on the highways. See 26 U.S.C. § 4481. Trism objected to the claim’s priority classification, then confirmed a liquidating plan-2- assigning authority to liquidate claim objections to the Trustees. After a hearing, the bankruptcy court decided the monetary obligation imposed by § 4481 was an excise tax on a transaction entitled to priority under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8)(E) (granting priority to unsecured governmental claims for an “excise tax” on a “transaction”). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. In re Trism , 311 B.R. 509 (B.A.P. 8 thCir. 2004). The Trustees appeal arguing the bankruptcy court and BAP erroneously concluded the charges were a tax, rather than a user fee, and erroneously found a transaction had occurred. Having carefully reviewed the record, the briefs, and the applicable law, we conclude the bankruptcy court and BAP correctly decided the case. The obligation imposed by § 4481 is a tax, not a fee. Id. at 513-16. Further, the obligation is an excise tax on a transaction. Id. at 516-17. Because we have nothing to add to the BAP’s explanation, we summarily affirm. See 8 th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the

amended

Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joe F. Dickson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Joe F. Dickson Joe F. Dickson Chief Financial Officer Date:

November 17, 2010
EX-10.84



 Exhibit 10.84 

February 11, 2014 
 David Deason 

5212 Creekpoint Drive 
 Plano, TX 75093 

Dear David, 
 As a valued employee in an important leadership
role, we would like to extend an additional benefit to you which will provide financial security in the event your employment is terminated. 
 Effective
immediately, the following terms and conditions will apply to your employment: 
 In the event that your employment is terminated by the
Company without Cause, the Company shall pay you an amount equal to one times your then annual base salary. Payments will be made bi-weekly less all applicable withholding and other applicable taxes and deductions provided that you execute and
deliver to the Company, and do not revoke, a release of all claims against the Company substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (“Release”). 

For purposes of this letter, “Cause” means (A) your engaging in misconduct or gross negligence which is injurious to Company; (B) your indictment or
conviction by a court of competent jurisdiction with respect to any felony or other crime or violation of law involving fraud or dishonesty (with the exception of misconduct based in good faith on the advice of professional consultants, such as
attorneys and accountants), or your entry of a plea of nolo contendere with respect to any felony involving fraud or dishonesty (with the exception of misconduct based in good faith on the advice of professional consultants, such as attorneys and
accountants); (C) any gross negligence, intentional acts or intentional omissions by you, as determined by the Company in connection with the performance of the duties and responsibilities of your employment hereunder; (D) engaging in any act of
misconduct or moral turpitude, as determined by the Company; (E) abuse of or dependency on alcohol or drugs (illicit or otherwise) which adversely affects job performance; (F) failure or refusal by you to properly perform (as determined by the
Company in its reasonable discretion and judgment) the duties, responsibilities or obligations of your employment for reasons other than Disability or authorized leave, or to properly perform or follow (as determined by the Company in its reasonable
discretion and judgment) any lawful direction by the Company; or (G) breach of this Agreement or of any other duty to, written policy of, or agreement with the Company. 

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 
  
 



 
 Michelle Smith 
 Vice
President, Human Resources 
 MS/kmm 
 Attachment
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5050 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5050 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘May 31, 1918 Act Re3 peal Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) 1918 ACT.—The term ‘‘1918 Act’’ means 

7 the Act of May 31, 1918 (40 Stat. 592, chapter 88). 

8 (2) FORT HALL TOWNSITE.—The term ‘‘Fort 

9 Hall Townsite’’ means the land that was taken out 

10 of trust by being set aside or set apart under the 

11 1918 Act on the Fort Hall Reservation, consisting of 

12 approximately 120 acres in the East Half of the 

13 Northeast Quarter in Section 35 and the West Half 

14 of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter in Sec15 tion 36, Township 4 South, Range 34 East, Boise 

16 Meridian, Idaho, based upon a survey completed on 

17 May 19, 1921, and depicted on the document enti18 tled ‘‘Plat of the Townsite of Fort Hall’’ on file with 

19 Bingham County, Idaho and the Tribes. 

20 (3) TRIBES.—The term ‘‘Tribes’’ means the 

21 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reserva22 tion. 

23 SEC. 3. REPEAL. 

24 The 1918 Act is repealed. 
3 

•HR 5050 EH

1 SEC. 4. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Tribes shall have the exclu3 sive right of first refusal to purchase at fair market value 

4 any land— 

5 (1) within the Fort Hall Townsite; and 

6 (2) offered for sale. 

7 (b) ACQUIRED LAND HELD IN TRUST.—The United 

8 States shall hold in trust for the benefit of the Tribes or 

9 a member of the Tribes, as applicable— 

10 (1) any land owned or acquired by the Tribes 

11 or a member of the Tribes within the Fort Hall 

12 Townsite before the date of enactment of this Act; 

13 and 

14 (2) any land owned or acquired by the Tribes 

15 or a member of the Tribes within the Fort Hall 

16 Townsite on or after the date of enactment of this 

17 Act. 

18 SEC. 5. EFFECT. 

19 Nothing in this Act affects any valid right to any land 

20 set aside or set apart under the 1918 Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5050 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Act of May 31, 1918, and for other 

purposes.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7403
SAMUEL C. MILLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-1970-3-18BD) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel C. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. South Carolina , No. CA-94-1970-3-18BD (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

TL/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISMAEL RAMIREZ-BERMUDEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73538

Agency No. A075-252-491

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Ismael Ramirez-Bermudez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant

FILED

FEB 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
TL/Research 2 07-73538

to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a

motion to reopen and review de novo constitutional claims. Iturribarria v. INS,

321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition

for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramirez-Bermudez’s second

motion to reopen as time- and number-barred where he filed the motion over five

years after the final order of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), and failed

to establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321

F.3d at 897.

We lack jurisdiction to review Ramirez-Bermudez’s contention that the BIA

should have invoked its sua sponte authority to reopen his proceedings. See

Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit 31.1

 

**Certification**

 

I, Raymond L. McFeetors, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company (the “registrant”);

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.   disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

| /s/Raymond L. McFeetors                                                                        | Date: | May 15, 2007 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|--------------|
| Raymond L. McFeetors, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13683 Filed: 04/26/23 Entered: 04/26/23 15:21:23 Page 1

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13683 Filed: 04/26/23 Entered: 04/26/23 15:21:23 Page 2

of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13683 Filed: 04/26/23 Entered: 04/26/23 15:21:23 Page 3

of 3
<PAGE>   1
COBANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT (11)--STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended March 31
                                                        ------------------------------
                                                           1997                1996
                                                        ----------          ----------
<S>                                                  <C>                 <C>      
Primary:
       Average shares outstanding                        3,453,824           3,447,160
       Net effect of dilutive stock options--
            based on the treasury stock method
            using average market price                      35,866              28,900
                                                        ----------          ----------
       Total shares                                      3,489,690           3,476,060
                                                        ==========          ==========
       Net income                                       $1,286,582          $1,285,488
                                                        ==========          ==========
       Net income per share                             $     0.37          $     0.37
                                                        ==========          ==========
Fully diluted:
       Average shares outstanding                        3,453,824           3,447,160
       Net effect of dilutive stock options--
            based on the treasury stock method
            the higher of average market price 
            or ending market price                          42,028              28,900
                                                        ----------          ----------
       Total shares                                      3,495,852           3,476,060
                                                        ==========          ==========
       Net income                                       $1,286,582          $1,286,582
                                                        ==========          ==========
       Net income per share                             $     0.37          $     0.37
                                                        ==========          ==========
</TABLE>