alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,303,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (159,900)
<INVENTORY>                                    458,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,226,845
<PP&E>                                       7,455,538
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,777,313)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,012,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,845,434
<BONDS>                                      1,782,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,181,697
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,797,277)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,012,219
<SALES>                                      1,846,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,873,960
<CGS>                                        1,274,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,274,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              69,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,285
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,285
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 368 V

Filed: April 6, 2015

Not for P ublication

*************************************

MARTH A MASCIA

- STRICKLER

, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Diana Stadelnikas Sedar

, Sarasota, FL

, for petitioner.

Linda S. Renzi , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On April 6 , 2015 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 r equiremen t, petitioner assert s that s he did not

incur any costs in pursuit of he r petition. Petitioner submitted a draft application for attorne ys’

f ees and costs to respondent

. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain

items in petitioner’ s application

. Based on these objections, petitioner amend s her application for

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decision s of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarr anted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the b anned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

attor ne ys’ fees and costs to $ 14 ,892 .76

. Respondent does not object to this amount. The

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $ 14 ,892 .76

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a

chec k payable jointly to petitioner and Magl io, Christopher & Toale, P.A. in the amount of

$ 14 ,892 .76

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursu ant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 6, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel—NIBIB Training SEP.                    

*Date:*                         July 7–9, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Manana Sukhareva, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging & Bioeng, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–451–3397,                         *sukharem@mail.nih.gov*.                    

Dated: April 30, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010–10892 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO THE 
 IDI,
INC. 
 2015 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

WHEREAS, IDI, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) currently maintains and sponsors the IDI, Inc. 2015 Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, Section 14(k) of the Plan provides that the Board of the Directors of the
Company (“Board”) may amend the Plan from time to time; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board has determined it to be in its best
interests to amend the Plan as set forth herein; and 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective upon the Company’s Stockholders’ approval
as set forth in Section 14(k) of the Plan, the following amendment to the Plan is hereby adopted: 
 The last sentence of
Section 5(a) of the Plan shall be amended and restated to read as follows: 
 “The total number of shares of Common Stock that may
be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be 12,500,000. 
 Section 5(b) of the Plan shall be amended and restated to
read as follows: 
 “Certain Limitations on Specific Types of Awards. The granting of Awards under this Plan shall be
subject to the following limitations: 
 (i) With respect to the shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to this Section, a maximum of
12,500,000 of such shares may be subject to grants of Incentive Stock Options; 
 (ii) With respect to the shares of Common Stock issuable
pursuant to this Section, a maximum of 12,500,000 of such shares may be issued in connection with Awards, other than Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, that are settled in Common Stock; 

(iii) With respect to the shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to this Section, a maximum of 12,500,000 of such shares may be subject to
grants of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights to any one Eligible Individual during any one fiscal year; 
 (iv) With respect to the shares
of Common Stock issuable pursuant to this Section, a maximum of 12,500,000 of such shares may be subject to grants of Performance Shares, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units and Awards of Common Stock to any one Eligible Individual during any
one fiscal year; and 
 (v) The maximum value at Grant Date of grants of Performance Units which may be granted to any one Eligible
Individual during any one fiscal year shall be $1,000,000.” 
 Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of
the Plan shall remain valid and in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the
Company, has executed this instrument as of the 1st day of June, 2016, on behalf of the Company. 
  

			
	IDI, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Derek Dubner


 
			
		
	Name:	 	Derek Dubner


 
			
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
Form TRANSC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Northern District of California

In re Debtor(s):

PG&E Corporation

Case No.: 19−30088 DM 11

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT

AND DEADLINES RELATED TO RESTRICTION AND REDACTION

A transcript of the proceeding held on June 26, 2019 was filed on June 27, 2019. The following deadlines apply:

The parties have until Friday, July 5, 2019 to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this

transcript. The deadline for filing a request for redaction is Thursday, July 18, 2019.

If a request for redaction is filed, the redacted transcript is due Monday, July 29, 2019.

If no such notice is filed, the transcript may be made available for remote electronic access upon expiration of the

restriction period, which is Wednesday, September 25, 2019, unless extended by court order.

To review the transcript for redaction purposes, you may purchase a copy from the transcriber,

Jason Gottlieb

Attn: Jason Gottlieb, Dir. of Tran. Ops.

7227 N 16th St. #207

Phoenix, AZ 85020

or you may view the document at the clerk's office public terminal.

Dated: 7/3/19 For the Court:

Edward J. Emmons

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2781-1 Filed: 06/27/19 Entered: 06/27/19 17:46:25 Page 1

of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 3, 2015

jam 

# Order

Clerk November 3, 2015

1 52335

IN RE JONES

SC: 1 52335

C OA : 328229

LC: 04

- 008273

- FH

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff

- appellant having failed to pay the

partial filing fee as required by the order of September 23, 2015 , the Clerk of the Court is

hereby directed to close this file.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John A.  Featherman,  III, Chief Executive  Officer and Chairman of the Board of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:    November 9, 2006                    /s/ John A. Featherman, III
                                             ---------------------------
                                             John A. Featherman, III
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chairman of the Board





<PAGE>
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5019 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Rochester, New York, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5019 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST THEODORE MATTHEW GLENDE 

2 POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1335 Jefferson Road in Roch5 ester, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Specialist Theodore Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Theodore 

11 Matthew Glende Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## SJI Releases FY 2020 Grant Guideline

SJI recently released the Grant Guideline for FY 2020.  The Grant Guideline appears as part of the National Archives and Records Administration’s Federal Register, and sets forth the administrative, programmatic, and financial requirements for applying for and administering SJI grants.

Fiscal Year 2020 Deadlines for Project, Technical Assistance, and Curriculum Adaptation Grants are as follows:
                  - 1st Quarter – November 1, 2019
                  - 2nd Quarter – February 1, 2020
                  - 3rd Quarter – May 1, 2020
                  - 4th Quarter – August 1, 2020

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

            Subsidiary Name                       Jurisdiction of Organization
            ---------------                       ----------------------------

            Investment Advisory Network, LLC      Colorado
            SS&C Ventures, Inc.                   Connecticut
            HedgeWare, Inc.                       Delaware
            Quantra Software Corporation          Delaware
            SSC Direct.com, Inc.                  Delaware
            SS&C Pacific, Inc.                    Delaware
            Shepro Braun Systems, Inc.            Illinois
            Savid International Inc.              New Jersey
            The Savid Group, Inc.                 New York
            The Brookside Corporation             Rhode Island
            SS&C Fund Services N.V.               Curacao
            SS&C Fund Services (B.V.I.) Limited   British Virgin Islands
            SS&C Technologies PTE Ltd.            Singapore
            SS&C Technologies, KK                 Japan
            SS&C Technologies Limited             United Kingdom
            SS&C Technologies Sdn. Bhd.           Malaysia
            SS&C Technologies B.V.                Netherlands
#### Daniel Ryan and another, Respondents, v. The Elephant Building Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Bray and Overton 

Argued at Norfolk, Virginia 

THOMAS ALLAN WALTERS 

v. Record No. 2388-94-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

KAREN ELIZABETH RIESBECK WALTERS OCTOBER 10, 1995 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY 

John M. Folkes, Judge 

 Breckenridge Ingles (Martin, Ingles & Ingles, 

Ltd., on brief), for appellant. 

 William E. Moore (Moore, Foard & Dias, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 Appellant claims that the circuit court, in a decree a 

vinculo matrimonii, erred by (1) failing to value, identify, and 

order a division of marital and separate property, (2) 

miscalculating the income of the parties for the purposes of an 

alimony award, (3) awarding alimony to appellee, and (4) ordering 

appellant to pay 80% of medical expenses of the children not 

covered by insurance. We hold that the court did err as to the 

first assignment, but that the error was harmless. Finding no 

other error by the court, we affirm. 

 The court is required by statute to "determine the legal 

title as between the parties, and the ownership and value of all 

property . . . ." Code § 20-107.3(A); see Bosserman v. 

Bosserman, 9 Va. App. 1, 5, 384 S.E.2d 104, 107 (1989); Bowers v. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

Bowers, 4 Va. App. 610, 616-17, 359 S.E.2d 546, 550 (1987). In 

this case the court accepted the decision of the commissioner to 

adopt the de facto division of the property as it had been done 

by the parties. The commissioner's ruling, however, was vague as 

to the legal status and value of many items of property, and the 

circuit court should have made a clear ruling so as to conform 

strictly with Code § 20-107.3. 

 The factual circumstances in this case, however, lead to a 

conclusion that the error was harmless. The purpose of the 

statutory requirements in Code § 20-107.3 is to fairly divide the 

value of the property. Bosserman, 9 Va. App. at 5, 384 S.E.2d at 

107; Robinette v. Robinette, 4 Va. App. 123, 130, 354 S.E.2d 808, 

811 (1987). Although the bulk of the property was ultimately 

given to the appellee, this result is not unjust. The error does 

not compel us to reverse the trial court's decision. 

 We find that the court made no other errors. Accordingly, 

we affirm. 

 Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       864
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              3,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                 267
<INVENTORY>                                1,476
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6,469
<PP&E>                                     1,684
<DEPRECIATION>                               643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            20,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      7,077
<BONDS>                                    3,763
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     104
<OTHER-SE>                                 9,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              20,247
<SALES>                                   14,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          14,365
<CGS>                                      2,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          11,769
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              296
<INCOME-TAX>                                  58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          238
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 238
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             ($0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             ($0.06)
        


</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2147 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:15:32 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2147 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:15:32 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2147 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:15:32 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2147 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:15:32 Page 4 of

4