alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Columbia Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Greg B. Spear, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      3.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      4.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the period certified.

     Date:  May 6, 2005                          /s/ GREG B. SPEAR
                                                 -----------------
                                                 Greg B. Spear
                                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                                 Chief Accounting Officer

                                       11
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ended  December 31, 2005,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, James Hayward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                                     /s/ JAMES HAYWARD
                                                     -----------------
                                                     James Hayward
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     February 21, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CombiMatrix Corporation (the “Company”) Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the annual period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2013, (the “Report”), based on my knowledge, I, Scott R. Burell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:   | /s/   SCOTT R. BURELL     |
|-----------------|---------------------------|
|            | Scott   R. Burell         |
|            | Chief   Financial Officer |
|            | April 26,   2013     |

 

----
Order entered November ,2012

In The

 igtri t gexag at aIla 

No. 05-12-00591-CR

No. 05-12-00592-CR

BRUCE KEVIN CONWAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F07-57835-M, F10-61538-M

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On October 8, 2012, ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the finding that appellant no longer desires to

pursue the appeals.

We ORDER the appeals submitted as of the date of this order to a panel consisting of

Justices O’Neill, FitzGerald, and Lang-Miers.

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Chapter 11

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this evidence and 

notice.

Olympus Peak Master Fund LP North American Substation Services, LLC

Name of Transferee Name of Transferor

Phone: 212-373-1189

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Phone: 407-788-3717

Last Four Digits of Acct #: N/A

Name and Address where notices and payments to 

transferee should be sent: 

Leah Silverman

745 Fifth Avenue

Suite 1604

New York, NY 10151

Claim No: 3415

Case No.: PG&E Corporation (19-30088)

Date Filed: June 19, 2019

Total Amount of Claim: $1,709,391.62

Transferred Amount of Claim: $1,709,391.62

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the 

best of my knowledge and belief.

By: /s/ Leah Silverman Date: July 15, 2019

Transferee/Transferee's Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 

18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2974 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 10:35:20 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2974 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 10:35:20 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2974 Filed: 07/15/19 Entered: 07/15/19 10:35:20 Page 3 of

3
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 483 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 483

              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2013

  Mr. Hudson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmers Against Crippling Taxes 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to estate, gift, and generation-skipping taxes) is hereby 
repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to estates of decedents dying, gifts made, and generation-skipping 
transfers made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK SEISIRO SOLOMON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 193 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1304

___________ Bobby Dean Lewis, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Danny Estes, in his individual and his * District Court for the official capacity as Sheriff of * Western District of Missouri. Nodaway County, Missouri; Tray * Pitts, in his individual capacity as * Deputy Sheriff; D. L. Merrill, Trooper, * [UNPUBLISHED] in his individual capacity; David A. * Baird, Prosecuting Attorney for * Nodaway County, Missouri, in his * individual capacity; Roger Combs, * Circuit Judge for Nodaway County, * Missouri, in his individual capacity, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 6, 2000 Filed: November 8, 2000

___________ Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The HONORABLE NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, United States District Judge

for the Western District of Missouri. -2- Missouri inmate Bobby Dean Lewis appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he had sought a declaratory judgment against a judge, a prosecuting attorney, a sheriff, a deputy sheriff, and a state trooper.
Lewis argues this dismissal was erroneous because he paid his filing fee. We disagree. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (granting district court authority to review, before or immediately after docketing, all prisoners’ civil complaints that seek redress from governmentalentities, officers, or employees; court shall dismiss actions that are, inter alia, frivolous or malicious); Rowe v. Shake , 196 F.3d 778, 781 (7th Cir. 1999) (based onplain statutory language, “§ 1915A applies to all prisoners, no matter their fee status, who bring suit against a government entity, officer, or employee”); Carr v. Dvorin , 171 F.3d 115, 116 (2d Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (§ 1915A’s screening procedure applies to all civil complaints filed by prisoners, regardless of payment of filing fee); McGore v. Wrigglesworth , 114 F.3d 601, 608 (6th Cir. 1997) (same). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Rel: November 17, 2023

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024

SC-2022-0927 David A. Young; Torch13, LLC; and Shawn Young v. Ross Gagliano (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-20-902150). BRYAN, Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Wise, Sellers, Mendheim, Stewart, Mitchell, and Cook, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0049

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTIAN NYANFORE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 12, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 7 2020

05/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0049
#### ROBERT MURRAY, Jr., Appellant, *v.*DOUGLASS ROBINSON and JAMES F. COX, Respondents.

*Bxtra*ctllowcmce— *Code,*§ 309.

Where in an action npon a money demand the plaintiff claims to recover $,7,000, and npon the trial obtains a verdict for six cents, an extra allowance cannot be granted to the defendant, under section 309 of the Code, based upon the amount claimed by the plaintiff.

Appeal from an order made at the Special Term granting an extra allowance to the defendant, under section 309 of the Code.

This action was brought to recover ¡¡¡>7,750, to which amount the plaintiff claims to have been damaged, by the failure of the defendant to effect an insurance to that amount upon a vessel belonging to the plaintiff. Upon the trial the plaintiff had a verdict of six cents.

*Dexter A.*Hawhins, for the appellant.

*Treadwell Cleveland,*for the respondents.

Barnard, P. J. :

We have twice held in this court that the allowance in question could not be made; the first case was *Morse*v. -, tried at Cir*138cuit. Tlie complaint claimed $1,500 as a contract-price for the manufacture of brick machines. The defendant averred in his answer that the machines were warranted to accomplish a. certain result, and failed; that he had paid $500 on the contract, and asked to recover that sum. The jury found a verdict for defendant for $500, and the court, at Special Term, held that no extra allowance could be made beyond five per cent on the recovery, $500. This court at General Term affirmed this order. The second ease was the case of *Pinder*v. *Stoolhoff*(reported in 7 Abbot [N. S.], 433). There the recovery was'by the plaintiff, for six cents. This court held that the defendant was entitled to no extra allowance, because he had not recovered.

This action is a pure action at law upon a money demand. There cannot be two recoveries — one by the plaintiff for damages and the other by the defendant for costs. The words *“*recovery or claim,” in section 309 of the Code, have a technical, legal meaning— when the plaintiff succeeds he recovers, when the defendant succeeds he destroys the plaintiff’s claim.

The order granting an extra allowance should be reversed, with costs and disbursements.

Present — Baenaed, P. J., Peatt and Dyeman, JJ.

Order reversed, with, costs and disbursements.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 203-1    Filed: 01/30/19    Entered: 01/31/19 16:39:18    Page 1of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the quarterly report of Forster Drilling Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, F. E.
      Forster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
      October 23, 2006




By
        /s/
        F.E. Forster, III


F.
      E.
      Forster III, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 99.1**
Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, theundersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of INTERMET Corporation (the“Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
/s/ John Doddridge
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2858 Filed: 07/03/19 Entered: 07/03/19 12:27:50 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2858 Filed: 07/03/19 Entered: 07/03/19 12:27:50 Page 2 of

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James Hayward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

    1.   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                                  /s/  JAMES A. HAYWARD
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  James A. Hayward
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  August 17, 2006
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**

**Of 3SBio Inc.**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of 3SBio Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bo Tan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements   of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of   1934; and                 |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company. |

 

Date:June 3, 2011

 

 
| By:        | /s/ Bo Tan             |       |
|------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| **Name:**  | **Bo Tan**                  | ** ** |
| **Title:** | **Chief Financial Officer** | ** ** |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
NO. 07-09-0039-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	SEPTEMBER 28, 2009

	______________________________

	JASON E. STEELY, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2007-417068; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION	

	Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, Jason E. Steely, was convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, a state jail felony.  The jury sentenced Appellant to nineteen months in a state jail facility.  Pending before this Court is Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal in which he requests that this Court withdraw his notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal.  As required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is signed by Appellant and his attorney.  No decision of this Court having been delivered, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice

Do not publish.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

#153396630_v3

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

Holland & Knight LLP

560 Mission Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel: 415.743.6900

Fax: 415.743.6910

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

Leah E. Capritta (pro hac vice)

1801 California Street, Suite 5000

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone (303) 974-6660

Facsimile (303) 974-6659

Email: leah.capritta@hklaw.com 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

Vito Costanzo (SBN 132754)

400 South Hope Street, 8th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 896-2400

Facsimile: (213) 896-2450

Email: vito.costanza@hklaw.com

Attorneys for 

TIGER NATURAL GAS, INC.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

□ Affects PG&E Corporation

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company

■ Affects both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case,

No. 19-30088 (DM)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

) 

) 

)

)

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 19-30089 (DM)

Chapter 11

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF TIGER 

NATURAL GAS, INC.’S 

MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

[Relates to Dkt. Nos. 13451, 134512, 13453, 

13454, 13515, 13515-1, 13515-2, 13515-3, 

13515-4]

Date: April 11, 2023

Time: 10:00 AM (Pacific Time)

Place: Tele/Videoconference Appearance

United States Bankruptcy Court

Courtroom 17, 16th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13656 Filed: 04/05/23 Entered: 04/05/23 13:28:42 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

TO THE COURT, PARTIES INTEREST, AND THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Tiger Natural Gas, Inc., by and through its undersigned 

counsel, hereby withdraws its Motion to Enforce Settlement [Doc. 13451, 13515]. 

DATED: April 5, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

By: /s/ Leah E. Capritta

Leah E. Capritta

Attorneys for Tiger Natural Gas, Inc.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 13656 Filed: 04/05/23 Entered: 04/05/23 13:28:42 Page 2

of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12701]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3a7a1b2b7b6b2bdb2bfaaa0baa093b5beb0fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="423630232627232c232e3b312b3102242f216c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 011741-014.
    Title: U.S. Pacific Coast-Oceania Agreement.
    Parties: ANL Singapore PTE Ltd.; A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; CMA CGM 
S.A.; Hamburg-S[uuml]d; and Hapag-Lloyd AG.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment increases the maximum size of vessels the 
parties are authorized to deploy.
    Agreement No.: 201207.
    Title: Terminal 6 Lease Agreement Between the Port of Portland and 
ICTSI Oregon, Inc.
    Parties: Port of Portland and ICTSI Oregon, Inc.
    Filing Party: Paul D. Coleman, Esq.; Hoppel, Mayer & Coleman; 1050 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., 10th Floor; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The agreement provides for the lease of terminal 
facilities and other cooperative activities at the Port of Portland, 
OR.

    Dated: May 21, 2010.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-12701 Filed 5-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>