alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,175
<INVENTORY>                                     55,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,560
<PP&E>                                         437,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                 212,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 527,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,521
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   527,070
<SALES>                                        209,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,491
<CGS>                                          181,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,708
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,757
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,951
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,951
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4933 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4933

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 7-year 
        recovery period for motorsports entertainment complexes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2014

Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Posey, Mr. Collins of New York, 
  Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. McHenry, Mrs. Ellmers, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Roe of 
  Tennessee, Mr. Sessions, Mr. DeSantis, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. 
Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Mica, Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Hastings 
 of Washington, Mr. Yoder, Mr. Coble, Mr. Thompson of California, Mr. 
Carson of Indiana, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. Peters of Michigan, Mr. Bishop of 
Georgia, Ms. Titus, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, 
  Mr. Enyart, Mrs. Negrete McLeod, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. 
    Kuster, Mr. Pastor of Arizona, Mr. Foster, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. 
  Horsford, Mr. Lewis, and Mr. Maffei) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 7-year 
        recovery period for motorsports entertainment complexes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Motorsports Fairness and Permanency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. 7-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD FOR MOTORSPORTS ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES 
              MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 168(i)(15) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking subparagraph (D).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
 Globe Specialty Metals, Inc.:
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-163906) on Form S-3,  the Registration Statement (No. 333-162455) on Form S-8 and the Registration Statement (No. 333-172580) on Form S-8 of Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. of our reports dated August 27, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. and subsidiary companies (the Company) as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, which reports appear in Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K of Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
  Our report dated August 27, 2012 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012 contains an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company acquired Quebec Silicon Limited Partnership (Quebec Silicon) on June 13, 2012, and management excluded Quebec Silicon’s internal control over financial reporting from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, that the acquisition of Quebec Silicon contributed less than 1 percent of the Company’s total revenue for the year ended June 30, 2012 and accounted for approximately 15 percent of the Company’s total assets as of June 30, 2012, and that our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Quebec Silicon.
 /s/ KPMG LLP
 
 New York, New York
 March 8, 2013
32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
-------------------------------------------------
Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 6, 2010


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.


                                       42
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.1


OVERTON BANK AND TRUST, N.A.

SOUTH ARLINGTON OFFICE
CURTIS F. VON DER AHE
President

March 6, 1998


Mr. Tom Hoefert, CFO
InnoServ Technologies, Inc.
4330 Beltway #300
Arlington, TX. 76018

REFERENCE: LOAN AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 14, 1997 COVENANT VIOLATION.

Dear Mr. Hoefert,

You have indicated that InnoServ is in violation of the cash flow covenant as 
defined in section 7.J.(e)#4. of the above referenced loan agreement. We 
hereby waive compliance with this covenant until July 30, 1998.

If you require anything else, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,



/s/ Curtis F. Von Der Ahe
Curtis F. Von Der Ahe,
President





                                      17
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 22, 2016

s0615 

# Order

Clerk June 22, 2016

152916 & (60)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152916

COA: 321200

Genesee CC: 13

- 032919

- FH

TMANDO ALLEN DENSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 1, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Genesee County

Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after

the date of this order. The prosecutor shall pay particular attention to the defendant’s

argument that evidence of a prior act of violence was inadmissible under MRE 404(b).

The application for leave to appeal and the motion to remand remain pending.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6979

WADE STEPNEY, JR., a/k/a Wade Stephney, Jr., a/k/a Wade 

Stephney, a/k/a Wade Stepheny, Jr., 

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

D. BECKWITH, SCDC Warden, Wateree River Correctional 

Institution; DEPUTY WARDEN BLANDING; MAJOR BOGGS; CAPTAIN 

GASDEN; LIEUTENANT BROWN; SERGEANT DAVIS; SERGEANT HOOSIER,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District 

Judge. (8:09-cv-00771-MBS)

Submitted: July 30, 2010 Decided: August 23, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wade Stepney, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wade Stepney, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without 

prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Stepney v. Beckwith, No. 8:09-cv-00771-MBS (D.S.C. 

Jan. 21, 2010; May 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00808-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.E.R., K.R.R., Q.A.R., and M.C., Children

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-PA-00816

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s termination order is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant in relation to this 

appeal because he qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED April 15, 2020.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### RAY BENNETT v. WHIPPETT-KNIGHT COMPANY.

(Filed 11 December, 1929.)

Fraud A b — Purchaser having equal means of information and opportunity to inspect car may not maintain action for fraud.

Where the evidence discloses that the purchaser of a second-hand automobile had equal means of information with the seller as to the age and running condition of the *car,*and that the purchaser was not prevented from making a full and thorough examination of the car before the contract of purchase was entered into: *Held,*the purchaser may not successfully maintain an action for fraud for representation as to its age or running condition.

Civil actioN, before *MacRae, Special Judge,*at August Term, 1929, of YaNCEY.

Plaintiff alleged that on 16 April, 1929, be exchanged bis Overland car witb tbe defendant in return for “one 1926 model Oldsmobile.” Plaintiff further alleged tbat at tbe time of tbe exchange tbe defendant represented tbat tbe Oldsmobile “was a 1926 model, was in good condition, and in good running order.” Tbe plaintiff further alleged tbat in truth and in fact said car was a 1925 model, and not in good running condition; tbat bis Overland was worth $125 at tbe time of tbe exchange, and tbat be bad paid $30 in cash and $9.30 for repairs, making a total of $164.30, which be sought to recover in this action.

At tbe conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence there was judgment of non-suit. and tbe plaintiff appealed. '

*Watson & Fonts for plaintiff.*

*McBee & McBeeand Chas. Hutchins for defendant.*

Pee CuRiam.

Tbe record discloses tbat tbe plaintiff was a graduate of a junior college and engaged in teaching school. On 16 April, 1929, at tbe time of exchanging cars, plaintiff signed an affidavit which contained a statement tbat tbe Oldsmobile be received from tbe defendant was a 1925 model. He testified tbat be signed this paper-writing upon tbe representation of tbe bookkeeper of defendant tbat a controversy bad arisen between “tbe Oldsmobile people and tbe State of North Carolina-, tbat it was sold as a, 1925 model, and tbe State of. North Carolina gave title for *the*year tbe car was sold and not for tbe model of tbe ear.” Plaintiff further testified: “I drove tbe car some before I traded for it. . . . After I bad tried it out I told them to go ahead and fix up tbe papers, and I signed tbe papers at Spruce Pine witb an explanation which tbe bookkeeper gave to me. ... I bad every opportunity to *99look into tbe car and investigate it, but Mr. Sbuford said it was in good condition, and I took bis word for it.”

We do not tbink tbe evidence of fraud was sufficient to be submitted to tbe jury. It is obvious from tbe evidence tbat tbe parties bad equal means of information, and tbat tbe plaintiff was not prevented from making a full and tborougb examination and test of tbe property before tbe contract was entered into. *Peyton v. Griffin,*195 N. C., 685, 143 S. E., 525; *Cromwell v. Logan et al.,*196 N. C., 588, 146 S. E., 233.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002












In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Alan
Kirschbaum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/    
      Alan KirschbaumAlan
      Kirschbaum
                  Chief
      Financial Officer


November
13, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






20
**Exhibit 35.1**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify toWaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of  December 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank,National Association, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR19 for the 2006 fiscal year  (the “Relevant Year”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

 

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
|  

/s/ H. John Berens

___________________________________________

Name:  H. John Berens

Title:    Senior Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's balance sheet, statement of operations, statement of stockholder's
equity and statement of cash flows and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000743884
<NAME>                   MacroChem Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>             1
<CURRENCY>               U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        $ 7,415,873
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              7,565,170
<PP&E>                        828,347
<DEPRECIATION>                500,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                8,133,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         398,904
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      159,319
<OTHER-SE>                    7,561,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  7,720,709
<SALES>                       650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              50,650
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            2,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (712,316)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (712,316)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.05)

        

</TABLE>
32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monroe Bancorp (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon M. Dyott,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




/s/ Gordon M. Dyott
-------------------

Gordon M. Dyott
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
May 6, 2005


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed for any other purpose.
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
        PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 _____________________________________________________________
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 ______________________________________________________________
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
        December 31, 2006 (the "Report") of Best Care, Inc. (the "Registrant"), as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Haim
        Perlstein, the President, Treasurer, and Director of the Registrant, and
        Chaim
        Limor, the Secretary and Director of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
        best
        of each of our knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date:
        March 30, 2007
   Signature:
                  /s/
                      Haim PerlsteinName:
                  Haim
                      PerlsteinTitle:
                  President,
                      Treasurer,and
                      Director(Principal
                      Executive, Financial,and
                      Accounting Officer)
  Signature:
                    /s/
                        Chaim
                        LimorName:
                    Chaim
                        LimorTitle:
                    Secretary
                        and Director
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Daniel J. Scholl, Respondent, v. The County of Monroe, Appellant.

Order affirmed, without costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,079
<INVENTORY>                                         45
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,645
<PP&E>                                          40,816
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,526
<BONDS>                                         23,885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,089
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,723
<SALES>                                         27,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,725
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (417)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (5)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (412)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (412)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>