UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549





Form 10-QSB





(Mark One)

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007





[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT





For the transition period from _________to _________



Commission file number 0-14533





OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



|                                |                     
|------------------------------- | --------------------
|Maryland                        | 52-1322906          
|(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer    
|incorporation or organization)  | (Identification No.)





55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)





(864) 239-1000

(Issuer's telephone number)



Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X  No ___





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes __ No  X_



PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION





ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except unit data)



March 31, 2007







|                                               |           |         
|---------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------
|Assets                                         |           |         
|Cash and cash equivalents                      |           | $    426
|Receivables and deposits                       |           | 287     
|Other assets                                   |           | 594     
|Investment properties:                         |           |         
|Land                                           | $  2,160  |         
|Buildings and improvements                     | 34,456    |         
|                                               | 36,616    |         
|Less accumulated depreciation                  | (20,292)  | 16,324  
|                                               |           | $17,631 
|Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital |           |         
|Liabilities                                    |           |         
|Accounts payable                               |           | $    351
|Tenant security deposits                       |           | 85      
|Accrued taxes                                  |           | 172     
|Other liabilities                              |           | 266     
|Due to affiliates (Note B)                     |           | 2,296   
|Mortgage notes payable                         |           | 20,621  
|                                               |           |         
|Partners' (Deficiency) Capital                 |           |         
|General partners                               | $ (2,157) |         
|Assignor limited partner                       | 1         |         
|Assignee unit holders (25,714 units issued and |           |         
|23,558 outstanding)                            | (4,004)   | (6,160) 
|                                               |           | $17,631 





See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements















OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per unit data)







|                                                  |                    |           
|------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ----------
|                                                  | Three Months Ended
|                                                  | March 31,         
|                                                  | 2007               | 2006      
|                                                  |                    | (Restated)
|Revenues:                                         |                    |           
|Rental income                                     | $ 1,353            | $ 1,252   
|Other income                                      | 179                | 128       
|Casualty gain (Note C)                            | --                 | 73        
|Total revenues                                    | 1,532              | 1,453     
|                                                  |                    |           
|Expenses:                                         |                    |           
|Operating                                         | 713                | 758       
|General and administrative                        | 50                 | 54        
|Depreciation                                      | 410                | 363       
|Interest                                          | 278                | 322       
|Property taxes                                    | 167                | 160       
|Total expenses                                    | 1,618              | 1,657     
|                                                  |                    |           
|Loss from continuing operations                   | (86)               | (204)     
|Loss from discontinued operations (Note A)        | --                 | (54)      
|Net loss                                          | $(86)              | $(258)    
|                                                  |                    |           
|                                                  |                    |           
|Net loss allocated to general partners (2%)       | $    (2)           | $    (5)  
|Net loss allocated to assignee unit holders (98%) | (84)               | (253)     
|                                                  | $(86)              | $(258)    
|Per Assignee Unit:                                |                    |           
|Loss from continuing operations                   | $ (3.57)           | $ (8.49)  
|Loss from discontinued operations                 | --                 | (2.25)    
|                                                  | $(3.57)            | $(10.74)  







See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements















OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except unit data)











|                               |          |          |          |          |         
|------------------------------ | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | --------
|                               |          |          | Assignor | Assignee |         
|                               | Assignee | General  | Limited  | Unit     |         
|                               | Units    | Partners | Partner  | Holders  | Total   
|                               |          |          |          |          |         
|Partners' (deficiency) capital |          |          |          |          |         
|at December 31, 2006           | 23,558   | $(2,155) | $     1  | $(3,920) | $(6,074)
|                               |          |          |          |          |         
|Net loss for the three         |          |          |          |          |         
|months ended March 31, 2007    | --       | (2)      | --       | (84)     | (86)    
|                               |          |          |          |          |         
|Partners' (deficiency) capital |          |          |          |          |         
|at March 31, 2007              | 23,558   | $(2,157) | $1       | $(4,004) | $(6,160)







See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements













OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

|                                                           |                    |         
|---------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | --------
|                                                           | Three Months Ended
|                                                           | March 31,         
|                                                           | 2007               | 2006    
|Cash flows from operating activities:                      |                    |         
|Net loss                                                   | $  (86)            | $  (258)
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by  |                    |         
|operating activities:                                      |                    |         
|Depreciation                                               | 410                | 455     
|Amortization of loan costs                                 | 5                  | 6       
|Casualty gain                                              | --                 | (73)    
|Changes in accounts:                                       |                    |         
|Receivables and deposits                                   | (65)               | (11)    
|Other assets                                               | (136)              | (144)   
|Accounts payable                                           | 202                | 218     
|Tenant security deposits payable                           | --                 | (2)     
|Due to affiliates                                          | 75                 | 160     
|Accrued property taxes                                     | 37                 | 47      
|Other liabilities                                          | 41                 | (49)    
|Net cash provided by operating activities                  | 483                | 349     
|                                                           |                    |         
|Cash flows from investing activities:                      |                    |         
|Property improvements and replacements                     | (399)              | (751)   
|Net withdrawals from restricted escrow                     | 60                 | --      
|Insurance proceeds received                                | --                 | 100     
|Net cash used in investing activities                      | (339)              | (651)   
|                                                           |                    |         
|Cash flows from financing activities:                      |                    |         
|Payments on mortgage notes payable                         | (220)              | (241)   
|Advances from affiliate                                    | --                 | 282     
|Repayment of advances from affiliate                       | (865)              | --      
|Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities        | (1,085)            | 41      
|                                                           |                    |         
|Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                  | (941)              | (261)   
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period           | 1,367              | 398     
|                                                           |                    |         
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                 | $426               | $137    
|                                                           |                    |         
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:          |                    |         
|Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest        | $260               | $256    
|                                                           |                    |         
|Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow activity:         |                    |         
|Property improvements and replacements in accounts payable | $48                | $39     



At December 31, 2006 and 2005, accounts payable included approximately $231,000 and $544,000, for property improvements and replacements, which are included in property improvements and replacements for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.





See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements













OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)





Note A  Basis of Presentation



The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership" or "ORP") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of Oxford Residential Properties I Corporation (the "Managing General Partner"), all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The Managing General Partner is an affiliate of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.



In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 has been restated as of January 1, 2006 to reflect the operations of The Landings Apartments as loss from discontinued operations due to its sale on September 29, 2006.  Included in loss from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are revenues of approximately $260,000.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entitys own data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.



In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership has not yet determined whether it will elect the fair value option for any of its financial instruments.















Note B  Transactions with Affiliates



The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for payments to affiliates for property management services and for reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.



Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from all of the Partnership's properties as compensation for providing property management services. However, 40% of this fee is subordinated until certain distribution preference levels to the Assignee Unit Holders are achieved. Total property management fees of approximately $77,000 and $84,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were charged to expense and are included in operating expense and loss from discontinued operations on the consolidated statements of operations.  Property management fees of approximately $31,000 and $34,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, have been deferred.  The cumulative deferred management fees as of March 31, 2007 totaled approximately $326,000 and are included in due to affiliates on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.



An affiliate of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $32,000 and $48,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expense and investment properties. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment properties for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $2,000 and $12,000, respectively. At March 31, 2007, approximately $435,000 in accountable administrative expenses were due to an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and are included in due to affiliates on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.



In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, during the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Managing General Partner advanced approximately $282,000 to the Partnership to pay for capital improvement related payables at all of the investment properties.  No such advances were received during the three months ended March 31, 2007.  Interest on advances accrues at the prime rate plus 2% (10.25% at March 31, 2007) and was approximately $47,000 and $85,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Partnership repaid approximately $907,000 of principal and accrued interest.  No such payments were made during the three months ended March 31, 2006.  At March 31, 2007, approximately $1,535,000 of advances and accrued interest is included in due to affiliates on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Subsequent to March 31, 2007, an affiliate of the Managing General Partner made an advance of approximately $10,000 to fund operating expenses at Raven Hill Apartments.



The Partnership insures its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability.  The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner.  During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $213,000 for hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.  Additional charges will be incurred by the Partnership during 2007 as other insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $209,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration during the year ended December 31, 2006.















Note C - Casualty Events



During November 2005, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Fairlane East Apartments, incurred approximately $67,000 in damages as a result of water damage.  During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $45,000 and wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $13,000 resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $32,000.



During January 2006, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Fairlane East Apartments, incurred approximately $79,000 in damages as a result of a fire.  During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $55,000 and wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $14,000 resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $41,000.



Note D  Contingencies



AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call." Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a week.   In June 2005 the court conditionally certified the collective action on both the on-call and overtime issues.  Approximately 1,049 individuals opted in to the class. On March 28, 2007, the court issued an opinion decertifying the collective action on both issues.  The court held that the members of the collective action are not similarly situated and the case may not proceed as a collective action.  The nine named plaintiffs still maintain their individual causes of action. The California and Maryland cases are still pending as they were stayed pending the outcome of the decertification motion in the District of Columbia case.  Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the Managing General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships consolidated financial condition or results of operations.



The Partnership is unaware of any pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment properties that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.



Environmental



Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release

or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its properties, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its properties.



Mold



The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements.  The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.  Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the Managing General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents.  To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.  Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships consolidated financial condition or results of operations.















ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION



The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Registrant operates; financing risks, including the risk that cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting and defending claims and any adverse outcomes, and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the documents the Registrant files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



The Partnership's investment properties consist of two apartment complexes. The following table sets forth the average occupancy of the properties for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:



|                             |                   |     
|---------------------------- | ----------------- | ----
|                             | Average Occupancy
|Property                     | 2007              | 2006
|                             |                   |     
|Raven Hill Apartments        | 95%               | 94% 
|Burnsville, Minnesota        |                   |     
|Fairlane East Apartments (1) | 96%               | 80% 
|Dearborn, Michigan           |                   |     



(1)

The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at Fairlane East Apartments to the completion of a redevelopment project and resident retention efforts at the property.



The Partnerships financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment properties, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment properties, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner monitors the rental market environment of each of its investment properties to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses.  As part of this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the Managing General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnerships financial results.



Results of Operations



The Partnerships net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $86,000 and $258,000, respectively. The decrease in net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is due to a decrease in the loss from discontinued operations, an increase in total revenues and a decrease in total expenses. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 has been restated as of January 1, 2006 to reflect the operations of The Landings Apartments as loss from discontinued operations due to its sale on September 29, 2006.  Included in loss from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are revenues of approximately $260,000.



Excluding the loss from discontinued operations, the Partnerships loss from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $86,000 compared to loss from continuing operations of approximately $204,000 for the corresponding period in 2006.  The decrease in loss from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is due to an increase in total revenues and a decrease in total expenses.   Total revenues increased due to an increase in rental and other income partially offset by the recognition of a casualty gain in 2006.  Rental income increased due to an increase in occupancy at both properties and an increase in the average rental rate at Raven Hill Apartments, partially offset by a decrease in the average rental rate at Fairlane East Apartments.  Other income increased due to increases in tenant utility reimbursements at both of the Partnerships investment properties, an increase in lease cancellation fees at Fairlane East Apartments, and an increase in interest income as a result of a higher average balance of cash and cash equivalents.



During November 2005, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Fairlane East Apartments, incurred approximately $67,000 in damages as a result of water damage.  During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $45,000 and wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $13,000 resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $32,000.



During January 2006, one of the Partnerships investment properties, Fairlane East Apartments, incurred approximately $79,000 in damages as a result of a fire.  During the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $55,000 and wrote off undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $14,000 resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $41,000.



Total expenses decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2007 due to decreases in operating and interest expenses partially offset by increases in depreciation and property tax expenses.  General and administrative expenses remained comparable for both periods. Operating expense decreased due to decreases in property and maintenance expenses.  Property expense decreased due to decreases in utility costs at Fairlane East Apartments partially offset by an increase in payroll and related benefits at Raven Hill Apartments.  Maintenance expense decreased due to decreases in contract labor at Fairlane East Apartments.  Interest expense decreased due to a decrease in interest expense on the advances from an affiliate of the Managing General Partner as a result of a lower outstanding advance balance in 2007 and a decrease in interest on the mortgages encumbering the investment properties due to scheduled principal payments that reduced the carrying balance of the mortgages.  Depreciation expense increased due to property improvements and replacements placed into service during the past twelve months, which are now being depreciated.  Property tax expense increased due to an increase in the assessed value of Fairlane East Apartments.



Included in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are management reimbursements to the Managing General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement, costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



At March 31, 2007, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $426,000 compared to approximately $137,000 at March 31, 2006.  Cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $941,000 from December 31, 2006 due to approximately $1,085,000 and $339,000 of cash used in financing and investing activities, respectively partially offset by approximately $483,000 of cash provided by operating activities.  Net cash used in financing activities consisted of repayments of advances to an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and principal payments on the mortgages encumbering the investment properties.  Net cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements partially offset by net withdrawals from a restricted escrow. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.



In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, during the three months ended March 31, 2006, the Managing General Partner advanced approximately $282,000 to the Partnership to pay for capital improvement related payables at all of the investment properties.  No such advances were received during the three months ended March 31, 2007.  Interest on advances accrues at the prime rate plus 2% (10.25% at March 31, 2007) and was approximately $47,000 and $85,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Partnership repaid approximately $907,000 of principal and accrued interest.  No such payments were made during the three months ended March 31, 2006.  At March 31, 2007, approximately $1,535,000 of advances and accrued interest is included in due to affiliates on the consolidated balance sheet included in Item 1. Financial Statements. Subsequent to March 31, 2007, an affiliate of the Managing General Partner made an advance of approximately $10,000 to fund operating expenses at Raven Hill Apartments.



The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the Partnerships properties to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these changes, the Partnership expects that it will incur higher expenses related to compliance.  Capital improvements planned for the Partnerships properties are detailed below.



Raven Hill Apartments



During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $136,000 of capital improvements at Raven Hill Apartments, consisting primarily of HVAC improvements, security equipment upgrades, kitchen and bath countertop resurfacing and floor covering replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2007.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Fairlane East Apartments



During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $80,000 of capital improvements consisting primarily of grounds lighting, and air conditioning unit, appliance, and floor covering replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow and replacement reserves. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. In addition, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2007. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations, from Partnership reserves or advances from the affiliate of the Managing General Partner.  To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.



The Partnership's assets are thought to be generally sufficient for any near-term needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering the two investment properties of approximately $20,621,000 is being amortized over 20 years and is scheduled to be fully amortized at maturity in June 2023. Each mortgage note has a call option, which allows for the lender to declare the outstanding principal of the loans due and payable in July 2008 and on every fifth anniversary thereafter.



No distributions were made during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations, the timing of the exercise of the lender call option, property sales and/or refinancings. The Partnerships cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the amounts accrued and payable to affiliates of the Managing General Partner at March 31, 2007, there can be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations after required capital improvements to permit any distributions to its partners in 2007 or subsequent periods.



Other



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 14,109.5 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 59.89% of the outstanding Units at March 31, 2007.  A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters which would include voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 59.89% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO is in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates



The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.



Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



Investment properties are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable.  If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnerships estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property.   If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.



Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnerships investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; and changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing.  Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnerships assets.



Revenue Recognition



The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.



ITEM 3.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnerships management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures are effective.



(b)

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.

















PART II - OTHER INFORMATION





ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS



AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call." Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a week.   In June 2005 the court conditionally certified the collective action on both the on-call and overtime issues.  Approximately 1,049 individuals opted in to the class. On March 28, 2007, the court issued an opinion decertifying the collective action on both issues.  The court held that the members of the collective action are not similarly situated and the case may not proceed as a collective action.  The nine named plaintiffs still maintain their individual causes of action. The California and Maryland cases are still pending as they were stayed pending the outcome of the decertification motion in the District of Columbia case.  Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the Managing General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships consolidated financial condition or results of operations.



ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION



None.



ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS



See Exhibit Index.















SIGNATURES







In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





|                   |                                                    
|------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|                   | Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership
|                   |                                                    
|                   | By:   Oxford Residential Properties I Corporation  
|                   | Managing General Partner                           
|                   |                                                    
|Date: May 15, 2007 | By:   /s/Martha L. Long                            
|                   | Martha L. Long                                     
|                   | Senior Vice President                              
|                   |                                                    
|Date: May 15, 2007 | By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters                         
|                   | Stephen B. Waters                                  
|                   | Vice President                                     















OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit

Description of Exhibit





3.1

Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Prospectus of the Partnership, dated May 24, 1985).



4.1

Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from Exhibit A of the Prospectus of the Partnership, dated May 24, 1985).



10.9

Mortgage, security agreement, financing statement and fixture filing dated May 7, 2003 between ORP One L.L.C. and Golden American Life Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to the Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 8, 2003 and filed on May 23, 2003).



10.11

Mortgage, Security Agreement, Financing Statement and Fixture Filing dated May 7, 2003 between ORP Three L.L.C. and Golden American Life Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to the Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 8, 2003 and filed on May 23, 2003).

10.18

Purchase and Sale Contract between ORP Two, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, and Sun Shiel Properties II, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, dated May 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2006 and filed on May 19, 2006).



10.19

First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Contract between ORP Two, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, and Sun Shiel Properties II, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, dated June 13, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006).



31.1

Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



31.2

Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



32.1

Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.















Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 15, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of Oxford Residential Properties I Corporation, equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership













Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 15, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of Oxford Residential Properties I Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership













Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: May 15, 2007     
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: May 15, 2007     





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.