alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4895 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4895

To prohibit the sale or distribution of cosmetics containing synthetic 
                          plastic microbeads.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2014

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the sale or distribution of cosmetics containing synthetic 
                          plastic microbeads.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST SALE OR DISTRIBUTION OF COSMETICS 
              CONTAINING SYNTHETIC PLASTIC MICROBEADS.

    (a) In General.--Section 601 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 361) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(f) If it contains synthetic plastic microbeads.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
beginning on January 1, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
1 ... T her e i s no t r i al cour t ca us e n umber i n e i t her of t hes e c as es becau s e r el at ors al l ege t he di s t r i ct cl er k h as n o t f iled the ir p le a d ing s a n d a ssig n e d a c a u se nu m b e r. 2 ... W e n ot e t h at i t i s i mpr oper f or r el at or s t o j oi n t l y f

i l e a pet i t i on f

or w r i t of

ma n damu s r el at i n g t o e ac h of t hei r i nd i vi d ual t ri al co urt cases . I n t he f ut ure, rel at o rs are encouraged t o f i l e t hei r pet i t i o ns f

o r wr i t of m and am us ind ivid u a lly. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No. 04- 09-00063-CV IN RE Trac ey

W. MURP HY and MatthewD. WHITMIRE Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini , J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: Febr uary 18, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DI SMI SSED FOR L ACK OF J URI SDI CTI ON On Fe bruar

y 2, 2009, relators Trac ey W. Murphy and Matthew D. Whitm ire jointly filed a petition for writ of manda mus seekingto compel t h e Dist rict Clerk of K arne s County to file and pr oc e ss t he ir ple a din g s. 2 We conclude this cour t does not have jurisdiction t o g rant the r equeste d
re lie f. Th is c ourt ha s no mand amus jur isd ic tio n o ve r a dis tr ic t c le rk

un le ss t he iss ua nc e of the wr it is nece ssary

to enforc e our jurisdiction. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE ANN . § 22.221(a) -(b) (Ve rnon 2004); In re Coronado , 98 0 S.W. 2d 69 1, 69 2 ( Te x. Ap p. —Sa n A nto nio 19 98 , o ri g . p ro c e e din g ); se e als o04
- 09
- 00 06 3- CV

- 2- In re Simmonds , 271 S.W .3d 874 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proc eeding ). Relators have failed t o e s t a b l i s hth e w r i tth e y ar e r e qu e s t i n g i s n e c e s s ar y t o e n f o r c e o ur j ur i s d i c t i o n . A c c o r d i n g l y, relators’ petition for wr it of mandamus is dismis sed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER C URI AM
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin C. Quinn, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. Date: May 11, 2009/s/ Kevin C.
 QuinnKevin C.
 QuinnPresident
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Bowater
Incorporated
  Statement of Computation of Unaudited Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(in millions, except ratio information)
 Six Months Ended June 30,2005
    
    
    2004Earnings:Loss before
income taxes, minority interests and cumulative effect of accounting change
    
    $
    (16.8
    )
    
    $
    (94.5
    )Add: Fixed charges from below
    
    
    102.9
    
    
    
    100.4Less: Capitalized interest
    
    
    0.2
    
    
    
    $
    85.9
    
    
    $
    5.9Fixed Charges:Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
    
    
    99.5
    
    
    
    98.1Capitalized interest
    
    
    0.2
    
    
    
    Estimate of interest within rental expense
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    1.4Amortized premium and discounts related to indebtedness
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    0.9$
    102.9
    
    
    $
    100.4Deficiency of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    $
    17.0
    
    
    $
    94.5
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 18, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. CapGen Capital Group IV LLC and CapGen Capital Group IV LP, both 
of New York, New York; to become bank holding companies through the 
acquisition of up to 49.9 percent of the voting shares of Jacksonville 
Bancorp, Jacksonville, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire The 
Jacksonville Bank, Jacksonville, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 20, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-12509 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2369 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2369

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to waive federal preemption of 
State law providing for the awarding of punitive damages against motor 
  carriers for engaging in unfair or deceptive trade practices in the 
  processing of claims relating to loss, damage, injury, or delay in 
   connection with transportation of property in interstate commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2000

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to waive federal preemption of 
State law providing for the awarding of punitive damages against motor 
  carriers for engaging in unfair or deceptive trade practices in the 
  processing of claims relating to loss, damage, injury, or delay in 
   connection with transportation of property in interstate commerce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATE COURT AWARDS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR UNFAIR OR 
              DECEPTIVE PRACTICES OF MOTOR CARRIERS IN CONNECTION WITH 
              CLAIMS FOR LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY, OR DELAY OF TRANSPORTED 
              PROPERTY.

    (a) Punitive Damages Authorized.--Section 14706 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Punitive Damages for Unfair or Deceptive Practices.--Nothing 
in this section limits the liability of a carrier for punitive damages 
authorized under applicable State law for any act or omission of the 
carrier in connection with the investigation, settlement, adjudication, 
or other aspect of the processing of a claim under this section that 
constitutes an unfair or deceptive trade practice under such State 
law.''.
    (e) Retroactive Effective Date and Applicability.--Subsection (h) 
of section 14706 of title 49, United States Code (as added by 
subsection (a)), shall take effect as of January 1, 1990, and shall 
apply with respect to receipts and bills of lading referred to in 
subsection (a)(1) of such section that are issued on or after that 
date.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2399 Filed: 06/05/19 Entered: 06/05/19 13:30:27 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2399 Filed: 06/05/19 Entered: 06/05/19 13:30:27 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2399 Filed: 06/05/19 Entered: 06/05/19 13:30:27 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2399 Filed: 06/05/19 Entered: 06/05/19 13:30:27 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2399 Filed: 06/05/19 Entered: 06/05/19 13:30:27 Page 5 of

5
## COURT OF APPEALS SECO ND DISTRICT OF T EXAS FORT WORTH N O

. 2

- 0 8

- 4 2 8

- C V S H A W N A M E R C E R , I N D I V I D U A L L Y A P P E L L A N T A N D A S R E P R E S E N T A T I V E O F T H E E S T A T E O F B E N N I E M E R C E R , D E C E A S E D , A N D A S N A T U R A L M O T H E R A N D N E X T F R I E N D O F M E L I S S A M E R C E R , A M I N O R C H I L D V

. R I C H A R D S C H E R I G E R A P P E L L E E

- - - - - - - - - - F R O M T H E 9 0 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T O F Y O U N G C O U N T Y

- - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 1 

### A N D J U D G M E N T

- - - - - - - - - - W e h a v e c o n s i d e r e d t h e p a r t i e s ’ “ A g r e e d M o t i o n T o D i s m i s s A p p e a l

. ” I t i s t h e c o u r t ’ s o p i n i o n t h a t t h e m o t i o n s h o u l d b e g r a n t e d ; t h e r e f o r e , w e d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l

. S e e T e x . R

. A p p
. P

. 4 2

. 1 ( a ) ( 2 ) , 4 3

. 2 ( f )

.

1

 S e e T e x . R

. A p p
. P

. 4 7

. 4

.C o s t s o f t h e a p p e a l s h a l l b e p a i d b y t h e p a r t y i n c u r r i n g t h e s a m e , f o r

w h i c h l e t e x e c u t i o n i s s u e
. S e e T e x . R

. A p p
. P

. 4 3

. 4

.

P E R C U R I A M

P A N E L : W A L K E R , L I V I N G S T O N , a n d D A U P H I N O T , J J

. D E L I V E R E D : F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 1 0

2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RYAN JAY CONNELL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2793 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 21, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan Barthle, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KELLY, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12712]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION


Notice of Meeting

 May 10, 2010.
    Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission 
will hold its 93rd meeting in Washington, DC, on June 2-3, 2010. The 
business session, open to the public, will convene June 3 at 8:30 a.m.
    The Agenda items include:
    (1) Call to order and approval of the agenda.
    (2) Approval of the minutes from the 92nd meeting.
    (3) Commissioners and staff reports.
    (4) Discussion and presentations concerning Arctic research 
activities.
    The focus of the meeting will be reports and updates on programs 
and research projects affecting the Arctic.
    If you plan to attend this meeting, please notify us via the 
contact information below. Any person planning to attend who requires 
special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign 
language interpreters, must inform the Commission of those needs in 
advance of the meeting.
    Contact person for further information: John Farrell, Executive 
Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-
0090.

John Farrell,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-12712 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RASHEED JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 510 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of June, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7403

SAMUEL C. MILLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-94-1970-3-18BD)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel C. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Miller

v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-1970-3-18BD (D.S.C. Aug. 24, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sequans Communications S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Deborah Choate, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 21, 2015



|    |  |                                                    
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Deborah Choate                                 
|    |  | Name: Deborah Choate Title: Chief Financial
Officer
Order entered May 3 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01460
- CR WILLIAM BLOUNT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. F
- 1158965
- T



### O RDER In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and cour t appointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of SS&C
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      Date: March 12, 2004               By:  /s/ William C. Stone
                                              --------------------------------
                                              William C. Stone
                                              Chief Executive Officer

      Date: March 12, 2004               By:  /s/ Patrick J. Pedonti
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Patrick J. Pedonti
                                              Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 3, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00760

- CV

IN RE Linda Christina Benavides ALEXANDER and Shirley Hale Mathis, guardians of the

person and estate of Carlos Y. Benavides Jr., Relator

Origin al Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On October 30, 2014, relators filed a pet ition for writ of mandamus, prohibition and

injunction with a motion for temporary rel ief and emergency stay

.

Relator’s motion for temporary relief is GRANTED. All proceedings in Cause No.

2012CVQ000161

- D3, styled Texas Community Bank, N.A. v. Shirley Hale Mathis, Temporary

Guardian of Carlos Y. Benavides Jr., and L eticia R. Benavides , pending in the 49th Judicial

District Court

, Webb County, Texa s , are TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of

this court.

The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this court.

It is so ORDERED on November 3 rd , 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012CVQ000161

- D 3 , styled Texas Community Bank, N.A. v. Shirley Hale

Mathis, Temporary Guardian o f Carlos Y. Benavides Jr.

, and Leticia R. Benavides , pending in the 49th Judicial

District Court

, Webb County, Texas , the Honorable Joe Lopez presiding.