alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 NAME
    
    JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATIONOMR Systems Corporation
    
    New JerseyFinancial Models Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareFinancial Models Company Ltd.
    
    New YorkSS&C Fund Administration Services LLC
    
    New YorkOMR Systems International, Ltd.
    
    New JerseyFinancial Interactive, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaOpen Information Systems, Inc.
    
    ConnecticutCogent Management Inc.
    
    New YorkSAVID International Inc.
    
    New JerseyThe SAVID Group, Inc.
    
    New YorkThe Brookside Corporation
    
    Rhode Island3105198 Nova Scotia Company
    
    Nova ScotiaSS&C Technologies Canada Corp.
    
    Nova ScotiaFinancial Models Corporation Limited
    
    United KingdomFinancial Models Corporation B.V.
    
    NetherlandsFMC Global Investments Limited
    
    BarbadosSS&C Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
    
    AustraliaSS&C Technologies Limited
    
    United KingdomSS&C Technologies Sdn. Bhd.
    
    MalaysiaSS&C Technologies, KK
    
    JapanSS&C Technologies B.V.
    
    NetherlandsSS&C Technologies (s) Pte Ltd
    
    SingaporeOMR Systems United Kingdom
    
    United KingdomOMR Systems S.A.R.L.
    
    FranceSS&C Fund Services N.V.
    
    Netherlands AntillesSS&C Fund Services (B.V.I.) Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsHC Investments Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsSS&C (Bahamas) Ltd.
    
    BahamasSS&C Technologies Ireland Ltd.
    
    Ireland
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION and PACIFIC GAS 

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

 Debtors 

Chapter 11 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

(Jointly Administered) 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). 

Transferee hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 

Bankruptcy Procedure of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this 

evidence and notice. 

Slack Technologies Inc. Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

Name of Transferor Name of Transferee

Claim No: _______

Debtor: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

(19-30089) 

Claim Amount: $38,496.09 

Name and Address where notices and payments 

to transferee should be sent: 

Cherokee Debt Acquisition, LLC 

1325 Avenue of the Americas, 28th Floor 

New York, NY 10019 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct 

to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

By: _____________________ Date: June 17, 2019 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, 

or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

3064

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2568 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 10:57:56 Page 1 of

2
3064

9

,

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2568 Filed: 06/18/19 Entered: 06/18/19 10:57:56 Page 2 of

2
Order filed October 6 , 2020
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 19
- 00336
- CV

____________ MICHAEL REILLY AND RAVAGO AMERICAS LLC D/B/A GENESIS POLYMERS , Appellant V. PREMIER POLYMERS, L.L.C , Appellee
On Appeal from the 80th Di strict Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018
- 47163



### ORDER
Our review has determined that a non
- re dacted copy of Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff ’ s Response in Opposition to Defendant ’ s Mot ion to Dismiss Pu rsuant to Texas Citizens Participation Act, which was agr eed to be filed under seal was not in cluded in the clerk ’ s record. We order t he District Clerk to prepare and file with this court a supplemental sealed clerk ’ s record containing this document with in 10 days from the date of this order.
PER C URIAM
Panel Consists of J ustices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant

.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2024

NO. 03-24-00008-CV

In re Commitment of Johnathan Daniel Wintrow, Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 18, 2023. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Footstar, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-20731, No. 333-30011 and No. 333-41390) on Form S-8 of Footstar, Inc. of our
report dated August 27, 2004, except as to Note 3 as it relates to fiscal 2002
which is as of September 27, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statement of
operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows of
Footstar, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies for the year ended December 28, 2002 and
the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the January 1,
2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our report dated August 27, 2004, contains explanatory paragraphs that state
that:

     -    The consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the
          fiscal year ended December 28, 2002 have been restated to give effect
          to the Company's discontinued operations.

     -    On March 2, 2004, the Company filed voluntary petitions for
          reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This
          filing for reorganization raises substantial doubt about the Company's
          ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
          not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
          uncertainty.


/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
September 29, 2005
#### David Sullivan, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed on opinion of

Rumsey, J.,

at circuit, and the opinion of Bradley, J., in Monaghan v. Same, Defendant, at present term.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 252 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:33:55 Page 1 of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 252 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:33:55 Page 2 of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 252 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:33:55 Page 3 of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 252 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:33:55 Page 4 of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 252 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:33:55 Page 5 of 6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 252 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 14:33:55 Page 6 of 6
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 12-11197 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 3:05-cv-01267-MMH-JRK

JACKSONVILLE PROPERTY RIGHTS ASSOCIATION, INC., 

a Florida non-profit corporation,

HORTON ENTERPRISES, INC., 

a Florida corporation, 

d.b.a. The New Solid Gold, 

HARTSOCK ENTERPRISES, INC., 

a Florida corporation, 

d.b.a. Doll House, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants,

E.M.R.O. CORPORATION, INC., etc., et al.,

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs,

versus

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, 

a Florida municipal corporation, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.

Case: 12-11197 Date Filed: 11/13/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(November 13, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In Jacksonville Property Rights Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 635 F.3d

1266, 1277 (11 Cir. 2011), we dismissed the parties' appeals, vacated the District th

Court’s judgment, and remanded the case to the District Court “with instructions

to dismiss this action.” Following the issuance of our mandate, appellants moved

the District Court for leave to amend their complaint and for other relief. The

District Court, following the mandate rule, see Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112,

1120 (11 Cir. 1985), dismissed the case , “reserv[ing] jurisdiction to consider any

th 1

timely filed motions for attorneys’ fees and costs.”

Appellants now appeal the District Court’s ruling. The District Court did

precisely what our mandate instructed it to do, i.e., dismiss the action. We

accordingly affirm.

 We construe the dismissal to be without prejudice, since the basis for our disposition of 1

the parties’ appeals was that the case was moot. 

2

Case: 12-11197 Date Filed: 11/13/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
AFFIRMED. 

3

Case: 12-11197 Date Filed: 11/13/2012 Page: 3 of 3
<TABLE>

<CAPTION>

EXHIBIT 21.1    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                              Jurisdiction of                    % of Voting
                                                              Incorporation or          Securities Held at

NAME OF CORPORATION                                           ORGANIZATION                       DECEMBER 31, 1999

CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

<S>                                                              <C>                         <C>

     TioPro, LLC                                                 Nevada                     80%
     TIMET Capital Trust I                                       Delaware                   100%
     TIMET Colorado Corporation                                  Colorado                   100%
     TIMET Millbury Corporation                                  Oregon                     100%
         TIMET Castings Corporation                              Delaware                   100%
     TIMET Finance Management Company                            Delaware                   100%
     TIMET FSC, Ltd.                                             Barbados                   100%
     TIMET UK Limited                                            United Kingdom             100%
         TIMET UK (EXPORT) Limited                               United Kingdom             100%
         Titanium MC Limited                                     United Kingdom             100%
         TIMET Savoie, SA                                        France                      70%
         TIMET Germany Holding GmbH                              Germany                    100%
              TIMET Germany GmbH                                 Germany                    100%
              LASAB Laser Applikations-Und

                           Bearbeitungs, GmbH                    Germany                    100%

     Titanium Hearth Technologies, Inc.                          Delaware                   100%
     TMCA International Inc.                                     Delaware                   100%

         Loterios SpA                                            Italy                      100%
     TIMET Real Estate Corporation                               Colorado                   100%

UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

     MZI, LLC                                                    Oregon                      33%
     TiComp, Inc.                                                Delaware                    40%
     Titanium Memory Systems, Inc.                               California                  28%
     ValTimet SAS                                                France                      46%
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of TransAct Energy Corp. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roderick c. Bartlett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Roderick C. Bartlett Roderick C. Bartlett Chief Executive Officer Date: February 5, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4926 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4926

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate a segment of Interstate Route 35 in the State of Minnesota 
             as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The segment of Interstate Route 35 between milepost 133 at Forest 
Lake, Minnesota, and milepost 259 at Duluth, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the segment of Interstate Route 35 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``James L. Oberstar Memorial Highway''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 8, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

            Subsidiary Name                       Jurisdiction of Organization
            ---------------                       ----------------------------
            SS&C Ventures, Inc.                   Connecticut
            HC Investments Ltd.                   British Virgin Islands
            HedgeWare, Inc.                       Delaware
            Quantra Software Corporation          Delaware
            SSC Direct.com, Inc.                  Delaware
            SS&C Pacific, Inc.                    Delaware
            Shepro Braun Systems, Inc.            Illinois
            Savid International Inc.              New Jersey
            The Savid Group, Inc.                 New York
            The Brookside Corporation             Rhode Island
            SS&C Fund Services N.V.               Netherlands Antilles
            SS&C Fund Services (B.V.I.) Limited   British Virgin Islands
            SS&C Technologies PTE Ltd.            Singapore
            SS&C Technologies, KK                 Japan
            SS&C Technologies Limited             United Kingdom
            SS&C Technologies Sdn. Bhd.           Malaysia
            SS&C Technologies B.V.                Netherlands
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2480

DUN FANG ZHENG, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A71-956-044) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Winston W. Tsai, Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Karen Fletcher Torstenson, Assistant Director, Joan E. Smiley, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Dun Fang Zheng appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. Our review of the record discloses that the Board did not abuse its discretionand its decision is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Zheng v. INS , No. A71-956-044 (B.I.A. Sep. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1983 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 11:03:31 Page 1 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1983 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 11:03:31 Page 2 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1983 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 11:03:31 Page 3 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1983 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 11:03:31 Page 4 of

5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1983 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 11:03:31 Page 5 of

5
----

**ARCap**
**Servicing,      Inc.,**
** Morgan Stanley Capital**
**I      Inc,      ****Commercial      Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-IQl2**

| 1.   | a                review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the preceding                calendar year or portion thereof commencing from and after the Transaction                Closing Date and of the performance of the Special Servicer under                the                Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under the undersigned                officer's supervision; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | to                the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the                Special                Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and                Servicing                Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, or portion                thereof commencing from the Transaction Closing Date or if there                has been                a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,                has                specified each such failure and the nature and status                thereof. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**IN      WITNESS WHEREOF**

|   | /s/              James L. Duggins       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | James              L. Duggins           |
|   | Cheif              Executive Officer of |
|   | ARCap              Servicing, Inc.,     |
|   | a              Delaware corporation     |

----
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2550 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 15:58:18 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2550 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 15:58:18 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2550 Filed: 06/14/19 Entered: 06/14/19 15:58:18 Page 3 of

3
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*George Kent, Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of Wayne county, Appellant.

Same order as in People *ex rel.*Mason v. Same, Appellant, with disbursements only.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5026 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5026

  To prohibit closing or repurposing any propagation fish hatchery or 
 aquatic species propagation program of the Department of the Interior 
 unless such action is expressly authorized by an Act of Congress, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2014

 Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Roe 
  of Tennessee, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Michaud) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit closing or repurposing any propagation fish hatchery or 
 aquatic species propagation program of the Department of the Interior 
 unless such action is expressly authorized by an Act of Congress, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fish Hatchery Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CLOSING PROPAGATION FISH HATCHERIES OR 
              REPURPOSING PRIORITIES FOR PROPAGATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of the Interior may not permanently 
close, reprogram, repurpose, decommission, significantly alter, or move 
to caretaker status any fish and other aquatic species propagation 
hatchery or propagation program within the National Fish Hatchery 
System of the Department of the Interior unless such action is 
expressly authorized by an Act of Congress.
    (b) Effective Period.--This section shall be effective during the 
period beginning November 1, 2013, and ending upon the expiration of 
the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```