alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of CardioTech International, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric G. Walters, the chief financial officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:




(1)                The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)                The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Eric G. WaltersEric
      G. WaltersVice
      President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      June 27, 2008







This
certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




**CERTIFICATIONS**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Paul
      Intlekofer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does certify,
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
      my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Paul
              IntlekoferPaul
              IntlekoferPresident and Chief Executive Officer
              November
                14, 2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JEREMY HEATH BARNEY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 374 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended  September 30, 2002 (the  "Report") by Liberty  Housing
Partners  Limited  Partnership (the  "Company"),  the undersigned,  as the Chief
Executive  Officer of the  general  partner  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

o        the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o        the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                          /s/ Michael Stoller
                                          Name:    Michael Stoller
                                          Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1937    Filed: 05/09/19    Entered: 05/09/19 07:44:35    Page 1 of1
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50610 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MARIO PENALOZA-TREJO, also known as Mario Penalosa-Trejo Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2376-ALL
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Penaloza-Trejo raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and nota separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 5, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOBBY HENNY NANGOY and BOBBY

ALBERTO NANGOY,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71655

Agency Nos. A095-634-503

 A095-634-510

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2011** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Bobby Henny Nangoy and his son Bobby Alberto Nangoy, natives and

citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying

their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

FILED

APR 12 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71655

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049,

1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and

we remand.

The IJ denied petitioners’ asylum applications as time-barred. Petitioners do

not challenge this dispositive finding in their opening brief.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that petitioners did not

suffer past persecution because even considered cumulatively, the harassment and

threats endured by them and their family members, and the suspected poisoning

and beating of their dog did not rise to the level of persecution. See Wakkary, 558

F.3d at 1059-60; Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2003). Further,

the record does not compel the conclusion that there is a pattern or practice of

persecution against Christians in Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1060-62.

However, the agency found petitioners failed to demonstrate a clear

probability of persecution on account of their Christian religion based on what

occurred to them. In reaching this conclusion, the agency did not apply the

disfavored group analysis. In light of our intervening decision in Tampubolon v.

Holder, 610 F.3d 1056, 1062 (9th Cir. 2010), we remand for the agency to assess

petitioners’ withholding of removal claim under the disfavored group analysis in
3 08-71655

the first instance. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1067; see also INS v. Ventura, 537

U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that petitioners did not

establish a likelihood of torture by, at the instigation of, or with the consent or

acquiescence of the Indonesian government. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1067-68. 

Accordingly, their CAT claim fails.

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;

REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2003, of Commercial Federal Corporation as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2004 (the Report), I, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge, the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commercial
Federal Corporation.



Date: March 1, 2004



By:

/s/ William A. FitzgeraldWilliam A. Fitzgerald Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer/s/ David S. FisherDavid S. Fisher Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Commercial Federal Corporation and will be retained by Commercial Federal Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 15



Letter Regarding Unaudited

Interim Financial Information



Alfa Corporation

Montgomery, Alabama



Ladies and Gentlemen:



|    |  |                                                                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Registration Statement No. 33-83134 on Form S-3 and 33-77916 and 33-76460 on Form S-8



With respect to the subject
registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 10, 2005, related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), our report dated May 10, 2005 related to our review of interim financial
information is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Birmingham, Alabama

May 10, 2005
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2559

For the relief of Vijai Rajan.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 16, 2000

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Vijai Rajan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATURALIZATION FOR VIJAI RAJAN.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—By reason the inability of Vijai

5 Rajan to take the oath of allegiance required under section

6 337(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, because

7 of her physical disability, notwithstanding such section or

8 any other provision of such Act, the Attorney General shall

9 naturalize Vijai Rajan as a citizen of the United States

10 without her being administered the oath of allegiance pur11 suant to such section, not later than 5 days after the date

12 of the enactment of this Act.
2

•S 2559 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on

2 the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply re3 gardless of whether the application for naturalization filed

4 by Vijai Rajan before the date of the enactment of this

5 Act has been finally denied by the Attorney General before

6 such date.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        April Bolton-Smith, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3E304, Washington, DC 20202-6200. Telephone: (202) 260-1475 or by e-mail:                         *gulfcoastrecovery@ed.gov.*

If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.

## VIII. Other Information

*Accessible Format:*                         Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (                        *e.g.,*                         braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         in section VII of this notice.                    

*Electronic Access to This Document:*                         You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:                         *http://www.ed.gov/​news/​fedregister.*                         To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site.                    

# Note: 

                            The official version of this document is the document published in the                             **Federal Register**                            . Free Internet access to the official edition of the                             **Federal Register**                             and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at:                             *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html.*

Dated: May 24, 2010.

Thelma Meléndez de Santa Ana,

Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.

[FR Doc. 2010-12800 Filed 5-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40495

Summary Calendar

 

CHARLIE RAY TAYLOR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President,

United States, ET AL.

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(9:95-CV-375)

 

January 30, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charlie Ray Taylor, Texas prisoner # 334319, appeals the

district court’s denial of his motion for relief from the district

court’s judgment. Because Taylor does not raise any arguments

concerning the district court’s dismissal of his complaint or the

district court’s denial of his motion, he has abandoned the only

issue before this court. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Nonetheless, the
2

district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Taylor’s

action for failure to comply with the court’s order to file an

amended complaint and did not abuse its discretion in denying

Taylor’s motion for relief from the judgment. See Carimi v. Royal

Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., 959 F.2d 1344, 1345 (5th Cir. 1992).

Taylor’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous.

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).

Therefore, Taylor’s appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The district court stated in its memorandum opinion that at

least two prior actions filed by Taylor have been dismissed as

frivolous, and Taylor does not challenge this statement. Because

on at least two occasions in addition to this frivolous appeal,

Taylor has brought an action or appeal in a United States court

that was dismissed as frivolous, Taylor is BARRED from proceeding

IFP under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995. See Adepegba

v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, Taylor

may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) SANCTION IMPOSED.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 201-2    Filed: 01/30/19    Entered: 01/31/19 16:04:13    Page 1of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,648
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,663
<INVENTORY>                                     22,490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,841
<PP&E>                                         492,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 665,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,152
<BONDS>                                        373,064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           218
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   665,870
<SALES>                                        542,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               542,790
<CGS>                                          398,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,058
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (929)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit21**

**SUBSIDIARIES**
| NAME                          | ** ** | **JURISDICTION  OF FORMATION** |
|-------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------|
|                          |       |                           |
| Apex Luxembourg S.a.r.l.      |       | Luxembourg                     |
| Apex Silver Mines Sweden AB   |       | Sweden                         |
| Apex Metals Marketing GmbH    |       | Switzerland                    |
| Minera San Cristobal S.A.     |       | Bolivia                        |
| Apex Silver Mines Corporation |       | Delaware                       |
| Apex Silver Finance Ltd.      |       | Cayman Islands                 |

 

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# DATE AND TIME: 

Friday, May 28, 2010; 11:30 a.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

Via Teleconference, Public Dial In: 1-800-597-7623, Conference ID # 76198308.

## Meeting Agenda

This meeting is open to the public, except where noted otherwise.

I. Approval of Agenda

II. State Advisory Committee Issues
    - Colorado SAC
    - Oregon SAC
    - Consideration of Additional Nominee to the New Jersey SAC

III. Program Planning
    - Approval of Briefing Report on Health Care Disparities
    - Approval of Findings & Recommendations on Educational Effectiveness of Historically Black Colleges & Universities Briefing Report
    - Approval of 2011 Business Meeting Calendar
    - Update on Status of NBPP Enforcement Report—Some of the discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
    - Update on Status of Title IX Project—Some of the discussion of this       ( print page 28235)                          agenda item may be held in closed session.                
    - Discussion of Briefing Concept Paper on Attack against Asian-American Students at South Philadelphia High School

IV. Adjourn

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Dated: May 18, 2010.

David Blackwood,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-12309 Filed 5-18-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0 593 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JARRID KEITH CANFIELD,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 2 4 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2023

04/17/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0593