alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 488 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 

clarify that uncertified States and Indian tribes have the authority to 

use certain payments for certain noncoal reclamation projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. PEARCE (for himself and Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 

of 1977 to clarify that uncertified States and Indian 

tribes have the authority to use certain payments for 

certain noncoal reclamation projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION. 

4 (a) RECLAMATION FEE.—Section 402(g)(6)(A) of 

5 the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 

6 (30 U.S.C. 1232(g)(6)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and 

7 section 411(h)(1)’’ after ‘‘paragraphs (1) and (5)’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 488 IH

1 (b) FILLING VOIDS AND SEALING TUNNELS.—Sec2 tion 409(b) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclama3 tion Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1239(b)) is amended by in4 serting ‘‘and section 411(h)(1)’’ after ‘‘section 402(g)’’. 

5 (c) USE OF FUNDS.—Section 411(h)(1)(D)(ii) of the 

6 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 

7 U.S.C. 1240a(h)(1)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘sec8 tion 403’’ and inserting ‘‘section 402(g)(6), 403, or 409’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC.**

          Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I Bob G. Scott, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Summit Bancshares, Inc. (the “Corporation”) hereby certify, to my knowledge,  that:

|   | (i)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of the Corporation fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in the report. |

Dated:     November 10, 2005

|   | By:    | /s/ Bob G. Scott                                     |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                      |
|   | Name:  | Bob G. Scott                                         |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b) (32) of Regulation SK and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00478-CR

Archie Terrell Scaife, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 64079, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On June 29, 2009, appellant Archie Terrell Scaife pleaded guilty to possessing more

than one gram but less than four grams of cocaine in a school zone. See Tex. Health & Safety Code

Ann. §§ 481.115(a), (c), .134(c) (West Supp. 2009). Appellant also admitted a previous felony

conviction alleged for enhancement. The trial court accepted appellant’s pleas, adjudged him guilty,

and sentenced him to fifteen years’ imprisonment as called for in a plea bargain agreement. 

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on August 7, 2009. The trial court appointed an attorney

to represent appellant on appeal, and counsel has filed a brief challenging the pretrial order

overruling a motion to suppress evidence. 

Because there was no motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was not timely. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. See Tex.

R. App. P. 26.3. The notice of appeal was not properly mailed to the district clerk within the time
prescribed by rule 26.2(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circumstances, we lack

jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want

of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).1

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 3, 2010

Do Not Publish

The record also contains a waiver of appeal signed by appellant on the day sentence was

1

imposed. Nevertheless, the trial court certified that appellant has the right to appeal pretrial rulings. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Even if we assume that the trial court intended to grant permission

to appeal, the late notice of appeal does not invoke our jurisdiction.

2
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into as of this 23rd day of June, 2016, by and between CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (f/k/a Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and PATRICK J.
MCENANY (“Employee”). 
 Preliminary Statements 

A. The parties have previously entered into that certain Employment Agreement, effective as of November 8, 2006 (the “Original
Agreement”), as previously amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2008 (the “First Amendment”), that certain Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of
November 8, 2009 (the “Second Amendment”), that certain Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2011 (the “Third Amendment”), and that certain Fourth Amendment to Employment
Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2013 (the “Fourth Amendment,” and, together with the Original Agreement, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment and the Third Amendment, collectively, the “Employment
Agreement”). Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Employment Agreement. 

B. The parties wish to further amend the Employment Agreement to reflect the terms set forth below. 

Agreement 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 

 

	1.	Extension of Agreement. The outside date of the Term of the Employment Agreement is extended for a two-year period from the “tenth anniversary of the Effective Date (November 8, 2016) until the “twelfth
anniversary of the Effective Date” (November 8, 2018). All references in the Employment Agreement to the “third anniversary of the Effective Date”, the “fifth anniversary of the Effective Date”, the “seventh anniversary
of the Effective Date” or the “tenth anniversary of the Effective Date” shall be deemed by this Amendment to now refer to the “twelfth anniversary of the Effective Date.” 


 

	2.	Employment Agreement Remains in Effect. Except as otherwise specifically amended herein, the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. 


 

	3.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment, effective as of the date set
forth above. 
  

			
	CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a
Delaware corporation
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Steven R. Miller

		 	 Steven R. Miller, Chief Operating
Officer



  

			
	 EMPLOYEE:

	
	 /s/ Patrick J. McEnany

	 Patrick J. McEnany




  
 2
<Page>

                                                                      Exhibit 32


                             REX Stores Corporation
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned officers of REX Stores Corporation (the "Company")
hereby certify, to their knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004, which this certificate accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



STUART A. ROSE
Stuart A. Rose


DOUGLAS L. BRUGGEMAN
Douglas L. Bruggeman


Dated:  September 9, 2004
**MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME**  **Page 1**  **of 1**  **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA**
********* CREATIVE GAMES STUDIO LLC and RICARDO BACH CATER Appellants , v. DANIEL ALVES Appellee
. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) **SUPREME COURT NO. DA 23**  **- 0294**  **ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION**  **FOR EXTENSION OF TIME** 

AND NOW, upon considerat io n of Appellants ’ , Creative Games Studio LLC and Ri cardo Bach Cater, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, and good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Appellants’ Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellants’ deadline on which to file its opening br ief is October 13, 2023.
By : CLERK OF COURT

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court September 7 2023

09/07/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0294
H. R. 4812 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration to establish a process for providing expedited 

and dignified passenger screening services for veterans traveling to visit war 

memorials built and dedicated to honor their service, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor Flight Act’’. 

SEC. 2. HONOR FLIGHT PROGRAM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Title 49, United States Code, is amended 

by adding after section 44927 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 44928. Honor Flight program 

‘‘The Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration shall establish, in collaboration with the Honor Flight Network 

or other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, a process 

for providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services 

for veterans traveling on an Honor Flight Network private charter, 

or such other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, to 

visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor the service of 

such veterans.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents of title 49, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 44927 the following new item: 

‘‘44928. Honor Flight program.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### MYRON SPICKERMAN, Respondent, v. HENRY W. CLARK and JOSEPH COPELAND, Appellants.

*Evidence*— opinion *of loitness*— when *admissible.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried. This action was brought to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff, in consequence of a collision between the tug-boat E. D. Beach, upon the plaintiff, who was at the time employed as engineer, and the boat Charles E. Madden, then owned and operated by the defendants. The only question of interest passed upon by General Term is contained in the following portion of the opinion :

“ The only questions for us arise on the admission of evidence. A witness who had had experience in the management of boats, testified that from what he saw of the occurrence and from his knowledge and skill, he was able to form an opinion whether or not the Madden, by proper care, could have avoided the collision. He was then asked whether in his judgment the collision could have been avoided, by the parties on the Madden using proper care *134and caution. This was objected to by the defendants and was admitted.

In *Walsh*v. *Wash. Ins. Go.*(32 N. Y., 443), it was said to be admissible for the master of a vessel to testify to what its loss was attributable. So, in collisions of vessels, a nautical witness may testify whether in his opinion a collision could have been avoided by proper care on the part of the captain. *(FennieJc*v. *Bell,*1 C. & K., 312.) The rule, as laid down in Powell’s Evidence, is that the opinions of skilled or scientific witnesses are admissible evidence to elucidate matters which are of a strictly professional or scientific character. And whether it would be possible for a boat to avoid a collision is a question which certainly involves much professional knowledge. No objection was taken, that the question shopld .have been restricted to the ability to avoid the collision, after the persons on the Madden knew, or might have known, of the danger.”

*Bobertson c& Foster,*for the appellant. *O. A. Martin,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Leabned, P. J.

Present — Leabned, P. J., BoabdhaN and Bocees, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York v. David Snyder.

Motion to compel the restoration of the fine denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (File No. 333-32404 and 333-21875). Form S-4 (File No. 333-33689),
Form S-4 (File No. 333-50083), and Form S-3 (File No. 333-31453) of our report
dated February 15, 2000 relating to the financial statements which appear in
Advanced Radio Telecom Corp. and subsidiaries' Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1999.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 28, 2000
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 23, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00235

- CV

IN RE Peter B. FLORES , Relator

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

The petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief are DENIED. This order

replaces this court’s June 9, 2021 administrative order.

It is so ORDERED on June 23, 2021

.

_____________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of June, 2021

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CI06812 pending in the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County,

Texas, the Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Advisory Committee (#66).                    

*Date/Time:*                         June 17, 2010 2 p.m.-4 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Room 110 (teleconference).                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. (703) 292-8807.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning NSF science and education activities within the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.                    

*Agenda:*                         Report of the Committee of Visitors for the Division of Chemistry Report of the Committee of Visitors for the Division of Mathematical Sciences.                    

*Summary Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

Dated: May 19, 2010.

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-12494 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1877 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 11:17:16 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1877 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 11:17:16 Page 2 of

2
----

| Date:          May 2, 2011                            | By:    | /s/ Scott Yelvington                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   | Scott Yelvington                           |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

| Date:          May 2, 2011                            | By:    | /s/ Steven Neudecker                       |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   | Steven Neudecker                                |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----