alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Brian F. Lavin, President of NTS
Capital Corporation, the general partner of NTS-Properties Associates V, the general partner
of NTS-Properties V, a Maryland limited partnership (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1. |  | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period ended September
               30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 15, 2004

/s/ Brian F. Lavin

---

President of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates V,
General Partner of NTS-Properties V, a Maryland limited partnership

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-10-00123-CR

______________________________

MISTY SCOTT BEENE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 241st Judicial District Court

Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. 241-0243-08

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Misty Scott Beene appealed the adjudication of her sentence and revocation of her 

community supervision. She was adjudicated guilty of fraud regarding a controlled substance or 

prescription medication, and her community supervision was revoked in Smith County1on June 7, 

2010. Her notice of appeal was filed June 21, 2010.

Beene’s counsel has now filed a motion to permanently abate the appeal, stating that Beene 

has died. Counsel has attached to his motion a copy of her obituary.

The death of an appellant during the pendency of his or her appeal deprives this Court of 

jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2); Whitmire v. State, 943 S.W.2d 894 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1997); Rheinlander v. State, 918 S.W.2d 527, 528 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and permanently abate this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: August 31, 2010

Date Decided: September 1, 2010

Do Not Publish

 

1Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme 

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Vernon 2005).
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09** 
**- 6979** 

WADE STEPNEY, JR., a/k/a Wade Stephney, Jr., a/k/a Wade Stephney, a/k/a Wade Stepheny, Jr.,
Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. D. BECKWITH, SCDC Warden, Wateree River Corr ectional Institution; DEPUTY WARDEN BLANDING; MAJOR BOGGS; CAPTAIN GASDEN; LIEUTENANT BROWN; SERGEANT DAVIS; SERGEANT HOOSIER , Defendants

– Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Ma rgaret B. Seymour , District Judge. ( 8:09

- cv
- 00771

- MBS )

Submitted : July 30, 2010 Decided: August 23, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirme d by un published per curiam opinion

.

Wade Stepney, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unp ublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Wade Stepney, Jr. appeals th e district court’s order s accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies

. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Stepney v. Beckwith , No. 8:09

- cv
- 00771

- MBS (D.S.C.
Jan. 21, 2010; May 12, 2009 ). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRM ED
EXHIBIT 99.2

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC.

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of Summit Bancshares, Inc.
(the "Issuer").

I, Bob G. Scott, the Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and
Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m(a) or
          78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:   July 25, 2002

                                            /s/ Bob G. Scott
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Bob G. Scott
                                     Title: Executive Vice President and COO/CFO

Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 25th day of July, 2002.

                                            /s/ Kristen G. Laramore
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Kristen G. Laramore
                                     Title: Notary Public

My commission expires:  October 25, 2004
#### Charles L. Anderson and Charles A. Anderson v. William Studebaker.

*Practice—Negotiable Instruments—Notes—Consideration—Failure of.*

1. Where judgment is entered upon a judgment note, a court may properly deny the motion of the defendant for a stay of proceedings, and that he be let in to defend upon the ground of failure of consideration, where the showing by affidavit upon the part of the plaintiff that there can be no successful defense to the note, is as strong as that on the part of the defendant that there could be.

2. An appeal in such case brings up the final order only.

[Opinion filed January 16, 1891.]

*533Appeal from the Superior Court, of Cook County; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.

Mr. August Marx, for appellants.

Mr. M. Saloman, for appellee.

Gary, J.

The appellants gave to the appellee judgment notes for the unpaid part of the price of a machine and some lumber. Judgment being entered, they applied to stay proceedings and be let in to defend, upon the ground that there was a breach of warranty as to the machine and consequent failure of consideration. Upon conflicting affidavits the court denied the motion.

There is no statement on their part that the appellee is not pecuniarily able to pay damages, if there was a breach of warranty and consequent damages, so that they are not without remedy, if they are entitled to any. To say the least, the showing by affidavit on the part of the appellee that there could be no successful defense to the notes, was as strong as that on the part of the appellants, that there could be. In such a case it can not be said that the legal discretion of the court was not properly exercised.

The parties have treated this appeal as bringing up the whole case. In fact on’y the final order could properly be so brought. Lake v. Cook, 15 Ill. 353; Frear v. Comm. Nat. Bk., 73 Ill. 473; Hall v. Hamilton, 74 Ill. 437.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
EX-35 (d)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 19, 2007

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for GreenPoint Mortgage Funding Trust
2006-0H1

Per Section 13.01 of the Master Servicing and Trust Agreement, dated as of
12/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(1)     a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional
        Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(ii)    to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in
        all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if
        there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
        nature and status thereof.

Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 23G

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
of Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 1997, 
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Sunquest Information 
Systems, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8, No. 333-06015) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 
Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 1997 with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sunquest Information
Systems, Inc. incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 23, 1997
[DO N OT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 2- 11 19 7 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 3 :0 5- cv -0 12 67 -MM H-JRK
JAC KSONVILLE PROPERTY RIGHTS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Fl or id a n on -p ro fitco rp or at io n, HORTON ENT ERPRI SES, INC., a Fl or id a co rp or at io n, d.b .a. The New So li d Go ld , HARTSOCK ENTERPRISES, INC., a Fl or id a co rp or at io n, d.b .a. Dol l Ho us e, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff s - Ap pe ll an ts , E.M.R.O. CORPORATION, INC., et c., et a l., ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pl ai nt iff s, ve rs us CITY OF JAC KSONVILLE, FLO RIDA, a Fl or id a m

un ic ip al co rp or at io n, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen dant- App el le e.

Case: 12-11197 Date Filed: 11/13/2012 Page: 1 of 3__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di stric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (No ve m be r 13 , 20 12 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, MARCUS an d KRAVITC H, Circ ui t Jud ge s. PER CURI AM: InJac ks on vi ll e Pro pe rty Rig ht s As s'n , Inc . v. Ci ty of Ja ck so nv il le , 63 5 F .3d 12 66 , 12 77 (11 Cir . 20 11 ), we di sm is se d the parti es ' ap pe al s, v acat edth e Dis tri ct th Co urt’s jud gm en t, an d re m an de d the cas e to th e Dis tri ctCo urt “ with i ns tru ct io ns to di sm is s thi s ac ti on .” Fo ll owi ng th e is su an ce o f ou r m an da te , app el lant s m ov ed th e Dis tri ctCo urt fo r le av e to am en d the ir c om pl ai ntan d fo r ot he r rel ie f. The Dis tri ctCo urt, fo ll owi ng th e m an date rul e, se e Pi am bi no v. Ba il ey , 75 7 F .2d11 12 , 11 20 (11 Cir . 19 85 ), di sm is se d the cas e , “res erv [in g] juri sd ic ti onto co ns id er an y

th 1 ti m el y fil edm ot io ns foratt orne y s’ fees an d c os ts .” App el lant s n ow ap pe al th e Dis tri ctCo urt’s ru li ng . The Di stric t Co urt d id pr eci se ly wha t o urm an da te in stru ct editto do , i.e., d is m is s the act io n. We acco rd in gl y

affi rm . We construe the dismissal to be without prejudice , since the ba sis for our disposition of 1 the par ties’ appe als was that the c ase w as moot. 2 Case: 12-11197 Date Filed: 11/13/2012 Page: 2 of 3AFFIRMED.

3 Case: 12-11197 Date Filed: 11/13/2012 Page: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      48,097,000
<SECURITIES>                                66,950,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,161,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (788,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           121,345,000
<PP&E>                                      18,180,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,322,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             142,719,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,834,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               142,719,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,834,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,160,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            53,082,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               951,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (43,391,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (43,391,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (3.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.23)


</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2758 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 14:50:48 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2758 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 14:50:48 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2758 Filed: 06/25/19 Entered: 06/25/19 14:50:48 Page 

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited  financial  statements of Liberty Housing Partners Limited Partnership
at and for the period ended  September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         52,228
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               52,228
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,112,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          507,411
<BONDS>                                        13,328,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,723,443)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,112,835
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,428
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               92,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,953,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,944,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (89.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1.     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | 2.     | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|   |   | /s/                JAMES A. HAYWARD        |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | James                A. Hayward            |   |
|   |   | Principal                Financial Officer |   |
|   |   | May                21, 2007                |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4904 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4904

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide an incentive for 
   households participating in the supplemental nutrition assistance 
 program to purchase certain nutritious fruits and vegetables that are 
                       beneficial to good health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2014

 Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Cardenas, Ms. Clark of 
  Massachusetts, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Pastor of Arizona, Mr. 
    Quigley, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Lofgren, and Mr. Takano) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide an incentive for 
   households participating in the supplemental nutrition assistance 
 program to purchase certain nutritious fruits and vegetables that are 
                       beneficial to good health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vegetables Are Really Important 
Eating Tools for You (VARIETY) Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Definition.--Section 3 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 
U.S.C. 2012) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (k) by inserting ``, unless the context 
        specifies otherwise,'' after ``means'';
            (2) redesignating subsections (u) and (v) as subsections 
        (v) and (w), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (t) the following:
    ``(u) `Supplemental fruits and vegetables' means those fruits and 
vegetables containing nutrients that promote the health of the 
population served by the supplemental nutrition assistance program, as 
determined by the Secretary by rule.''.
    (b) Increase in Value of Allotment.--Section 8 of the Food and 
Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2017) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(m) The value of an allotment, determined under this section 
without regard to this subsection and issued to a household for a 
month, shall be increased by 30 percent of the cost of supplemental 
fruits and vegetables purchased by such household during such month, 
but not to exceed an aggregate monthly amount determined by the 
Secretary on the basis of household size.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
October 1, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

RENEE WEAVER , Appellant,

v.

DANIEL WEAVER , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1996

[ August 9, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Renatha S. Francis , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2018

- DR

003419

- XXXX

- MB

.

Marti Goldstein of Marti Goldstein, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
The appellant challenges an amended final judgment of dissolution of
marri age. We affirm with respect to all but one of the issues raised. The trial court erroneously failed to include findings of fact in the order on appeal as required by section 61.08, Florida Statutes (2020) , and we reverse and remand for the trial court to make these findings.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions

.

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., G ROSS and C IKLIN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Geospatial Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas R. Oxenreiter, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date: January 6, 2020By/s/ Thomas R. OxenreiterName:Thomas R. OxenreiterTitle:Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)