alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 11, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Clifford Stanford, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                

*1. Stafford Lester Scaff, Jr., and Anne Csercsics Scaff*, both of Lake City, Florida, to retain current, and acquire additional, voting shares of First Columbia Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain current, and accquire additional, voting shares of Columbia Bank, both of Lake City, Florida.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 24, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-12808 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0005659 29-MAY-2015 08:35 AM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 17, 2018

NO. 03-17-00760-CV

Audria Edmond, Appellant

v.

Mark McElhannon/Accent Real Estate Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD 

AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of possession signed by the trial court on November 28, 

2017. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s 

judgment. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.
ACCEPTED

01-14-00921-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/5/2015 1:48:26 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/5/2015 1:48:26 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 97 (Thursday, May 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28311-28312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12170 and <greek-i>12171]


Kentucky Disaster <greek-i>KY-00033

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

[[Page 28312]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Kentucky 
(FEMA-1912-DR), dated 05/11/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 05/01/2010 and continuing..
    Effective Date: 05/11/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/12/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/11/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 05/11/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Allen, Hart, Lewis, Logan, Metcalfe, Monroe, 
Rockcastle.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere....     3.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere.     3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere.     3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 121706 
and for economic injury is 121716.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-12083 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Lotta Wieler, Respondent, v. William Mooney (Nephew), Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars’ costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Haight, J.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 15, 2011

Mr. Jeffrey Lee Dorrell

Escamilla, Poneck & Cruz, LLP

201 Stratford

Houston, TX 77006

Google Blogspot

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Mr. Dennis M. Lynch

Figari & Davenport, L.L.P.

901 Main Street, LB 125, Ste. 3400

Dallas, TX 75202-3796

Mr. John Stephen Morgan

Harris, Duesler and Hatfield, LLP

550 Fannin Street, Suite 650

Beaumont, TX 77701

Honorable Donald J. Floyd

172nd District Court

1001 Pearl Street

Beaumont, TX 77701-3707

RE:Case Number:  10-0366

Court of Appeals Number:  09-10-00189-CV

Trial Court Number:  184,784

Style:IN RE  JOHN DOES 1 AND 2

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  (Justice Medina not sitting)

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 10-0366Page 2**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on June 15, 2010.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 15, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at 1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, Room A101, Rosslyn, Virginia 22209.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the meeting meets the criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that the data will be held in confidence.

                    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to submit material in writing to the chairman (                    *see***FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    ) concerning matters believed to be deserving of the Committee's attention.                

Dated: May 19, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-12408 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
EXHIBIT 32.1




ROHAT RESOURCES, INC.






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906






OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Rohat Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kok Cheang Lim, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kok Cheang Lim

Kok Cheang LimDate: February 14, 2011

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
PROMEDCO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
EXHIBIT 11
Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                      Years Ended December 31,       
                                                                     1997                  1998      
<S>                                                           <C>                   <C>
BASIC
     Weighted average shares outstanding                               9,320,174           17,995,797
     Contingently issuable shares in business combinations             2,055,488              626,191
                                                              ------------------    -----------------
     Number of common shares outstanding                              11,375,662           18,621,988
                                                              ==================    =================

DILUTED
     Weighted average shares outstanding                               9,320,174           17,995,797
     Contingently issuable shares in business combinations             2,055,488              626,191
     Net common shares issuable on exercise of certain 
         stock options and warrants (1)                                2,848,536            2,335,783
     Other dilutive securities                                            -                    -     
                                                              ------------------    -----------------
     Number of common shares outstanding                              14,224,198           20,957,771
                                                              ==================    =================
</TABLE>










         (1) Net common shares issuable on exercise of certain stock options and
warrants is calculated based on the treasury stock method
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2163 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 12:08:09 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2163 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 12:08:09 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2163 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 12:08:09 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2163 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 12:08:09 Page 4 of

4
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5047 

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from altering available health 

care and wait times for appointments for health care for certain veterans, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2014 

Mr. PETERS of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from altering 

available health care and wait times for appointments 

for health care for certain veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuing Care for 

5 Veterans Act of 2014’’. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5047 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ALTERING AVAILABLE HEALTH 

2 CARE AND WAIT TIMES FOR APPOINTMENTS 

3 FOR HEALTH CARE FOR CERTAIN VETERANS. 

4 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not alter the 

5 hospital care, medical services, or other health care avail6 able to a veteran who is enrolled in the patient enrollment 

7 system of the Department of Veterans Affairs under sec8 tion 1705 of title 38, United States Code, or the amount 

9 of time such veteran is required to wait for an appoint10 ment for such care or services based solely on the length 

11 of time since such veteran has last received such care or 

12 services from the Department. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE v. LEWIS SENTELL.

(Filed 10 April, 1935.)

Criminal Law L a — Appeal must be dismissed where defendant fails to make out and serve statement of case on appeal within required time.

Where defendant in a caxntal case fails to make out and serve his statement of case on appeal within the statutory period, or the time extended, he loses his right to prosecute the appeal, and same will be dismissed upon motion of the Attorney-General after examination of the record proper for errors appearing upon its face.

Motion by State to docket and dismiss appeal.

*Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Aitorneys-General Ailcen and Bruton for the State.*

Stacy, O. J.

At the January Term, 1935, Cleveland Superior Court, the defendant herein, Lewis Sentell, was tried upon indictment charging him with the murder of one Mrs. "William Drake, which resulted in a conviction of murder in the first degree and sentence of death. From the judgment thus entered, the defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. The clerk certifies that nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal, albeit the defendant was allowed thirty days from the rising of the court within which to prepare and serve statement of case on appeal. The time for serving statement of case has now expired. *S. v. Brown,*206 N. C., 747, 175 S. E., 116.

The prisoner having failed to make out and serve statement of case on appeal within the statutory period, or the time extended, has lost his right to prosecute the appeal, and the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss under Rule 17 must be allowed. *S. v. Watson, ante,*
      *14170; *S. v. Etheridge,*207 N. C., 801; *S. v. Hooker,*207 N. C., 648; *S. v. Lea,*203 N. C., 316, 166 S. E., 292. It is customary, however, in capital cases, where the life of the prisoner is involved, to examine the record to see that no error appears upon its face. *S. v. Goldston,*201 N. C., 89, 158 S. E., 926. This we have done in the instant case without discovering any error on the face of the record. *S. v. Hamlet,*206 N. C., 568, 174 S. E., 451.

Appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 14, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41054 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RODNEY DEWAYNE MCMORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-74-3

-------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Dewayne Morris has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McMorris has filed a response in which he requests the appointment of new counsel. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal based on McMorris’s appeal waiver. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Morris’s reply discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 05-41054 -2- excused from further responsibilities, defendant’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, the Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 234 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 13:38:53 Page 1 of 1
#### BERRY-FORTUNE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. F. P. BACON.

(Filed 15 June, 1932.)

Contracts F c — Where plaintiff fails to establish contract sued on a non-suit is proper.

Where the plaintiff seeks to recover on a contract alleged to have been executed between a third party and the defendant for the plaintiff’s benefit, but the evidence fails to establish the alleged contract, a motion as of nonsuit is properly granted, and in this case it would seem that the defendant’s plea of res *judicata*on the ground that the matter had been determined in an action brought in another state is also well founded.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Sink, J.,*at September-October Term, 1931, of Pole.

Civil action to recover on contract between defendant and the Tryon Development Company, alleged to bave been made for the benefit of the plaintiff.

On 21 April, 1926, the plaintiff entered into a contract with, the Tryon Development Company to rebuild a large dam at Lake Lanier. It is alleged that the defendant agreed with the Tryon Development Company to furnish it “an amount sufficient to construct the dam at Lake Lanier.” The balance due the plaintiff on its contract at the time of the completion of the work was $26,096.09. A mechanic’s lien was filed by plaintiff and $17,311.19 realized therefrom, leaving a balance as of 15 August, 1927, of $8,784.90 due and unpaid.

*2In October, 1927, tbe plaintiff instituted a suit against the defendant in Spartanburg County, S. C., to recover this unpaid balance, alleging an original promise on the part of the defendant to pay the same. This action terminated in favor of the defendant.

The plaintiff now brings the present suit alleging that the contract between defendant and the Tryon Development Company to furnish the latter “an amount sufficient to construct the dam at Lake Lanier” was made for its benefit, and that plaintiff is entitled to recover thereon.

The defendant pleads *res judicata*and the statute of frauds.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, it appeals, assigning errors.

*Self, Bagby, Aiken & Patrick for plaintiff.*

*Massenburg & McGown, J. Hertz Brown and Shipman & Arledge for defendant.*

Stacy, C. J.

Plaintiff seeks to enforce a derivative right, but its evidence falls short of proving the basic contract as alleged between defendant and the Tryon Development Company. *Gorrell v. Water Co.,*124 N. C., 328, 32 S. E., 720; 6 R. C. L., 886. For this reason, the judgment of nonsuit is correct.

But going further, it would seem that the defendant’s plea of *res judicata*is also well founded. *Distributing Co. v. Carraway,*196 N. C., 58, 144 S. E., 535.

Affirmed.
Presidential Documents

3331 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 13 

Thursday, January 21, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13529 of January 16, 2010 

Ordering the Selected Reserve and Certain Individual Ready 

Reserve Members of the Armed Forces to Active Duty 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including sections 121 and 12304 

of title 10, United States Code, I hereby determine that it is necessary 

to augment the active Armed Forces of the United States for the effective 

conduct of operational missions, including those involving humanitarian 

assistance, related to relief efforts in Haiti necessitated by the earthquake 

on January 12, 2010. Further, under the stated authority, I hereby authorize 

the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with 

respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the 

Navy, under their respective jurisdictions, to order to active duty any units, 

and any individual members not assigned to a unit organized to serve 

as a unit, of the Selected Reserve, or any member in the Individual Ready 

Reserve mobilization category and designated as essential under regulations 

prescribed by the Secretary concerned, and to terminate the service of those 

units and members ordered to active duty. 

This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party 

against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, 

employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

January 16, 2010. 

[FR Doc. 2010–1229 

Filed 1–20–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W0–P 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULESOB#1.EPS</GPH>