alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Army South CG visits Panama to strengthen relationships
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/7/Images/SOUTHCOM_logo_thumb.jpg?ver=SIvIeRRofyrg5ZHPpvvh6Q%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">Army South CG visits Panama to strengthen relationships</h1>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2021/Nov/17/2002895358/1920/1080/0/211108-A-A4452-9001.JPG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="A U.S. Army South delegation traveled to Panama City, Panama, to conduct a key leader engagement with the National Border Service, or SENAFRONT Panama, commander and meet with United States Embassy representatives Nov. 8, 2021 to strengthen the Panamanian bilateral relationship and assess partnership sites."
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">211108-A-A4452-1001</div>
            <div class="image-caption">A U.S. Army South delegation traveled to Panama City, Panama, to conduct a key leader engagement with the National Border Service, or SENAFRONT Panama, commander and meet with United States Embassy representatives Nov. 8, 2021 to strengthen the Panamanian bilateral relationship and assess partnership sites.</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    <div><b>By Leanne Thomas</b> <span class="date">/ Published Nov. 17, 2021</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text">PANAMA CITY, Panama, </span>
    <p><span style="font-family:arial;">A U.S. Army South delegation, including Maj. Gen. William L. Thigpen, ARSOUTH commanding general, traveled to Panama City, Panama, to conduct a key leader engagement with the commander of the National Border Service, or SENAFRONT Panama, and meet with United States Embassy representatives Nov. 8, 2021, to strengthen the Panamanian bilateral relationship and assess partnership sites. </span></p>

<p><span style="font-family:arial;">U.S. Army South is part of a multinational and whole-of-government team working to advance security throughout Central and South America and the Caribbean in order to protect our shared values and way of life.</span></p>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
1996 10-K AND IS QUALIFYING IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001010683
<NAME>                        CBM Funding Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1,000
<CASH>                                         2
<SECURITIES>                                   12,273 <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  398,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               411,128
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 411,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38
<BONDS>                                        398,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   411,128
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               29,365
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             30,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,027)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,027)

<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,027)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.03)

<FN>
<F1> This represents deferred financing costs, net.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 7, 2014 

# Order

October 7 , 2014

148748 ( 58 )

AFT MICHIGAN, AFT, AFL

- CIO, et al

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ants

,

v

STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Defendant

- Appell ee

. SC: 148748

COA: 313960

Ct of Claims: 12

- 000104

- MM

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellee to file a responsive

brief to the amicus curiae brief filed by the Michigan Education Association is

GRANTED. The responsive brief submitted on October 1 , 2014, is accepted for filing

.
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ICOA,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries  (the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Erwin Vahlsing, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:
          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
/s/Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.
Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and
Director (Principal Accounting Officer)
November 19, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4995 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4995

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, as the ``Marilyn 
                         Monroe Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2014

  Mr. Cardenas (for himself, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Sherman, Mr. McKeon, Mr. 
   Thompson of California, Ms. Matsui, Mr. McNerney, Mr. Swalwell of 
California, Mr. Costa, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Farr, Mr. Ruiz, Mr. 
Peters of California, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Waters, and Mr. Lowenthal) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, as the ``Marilyn 
                         Monroe Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARILYN MONROE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6531 Van Nuys Boulevard in Van Nuys, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Marilyn Monroe Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marilyn 
Monroe Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2263 Filed: 05/29/19 Entered: 05/29/19 10:47:24 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2263 Filed: 05/29/19 Entered: 05/29/19 10:47:24 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2263 Filed: 05/29/19 Entered: 05/29/19 10:47:24 Page 3 of

3
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 494 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a reduced rate 

of excise tax on beer produced domestically by certain qualifying producers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2013 

Mr. GERLACH (for himself, Mr. NEAL, Mr. PAULSEN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. 

DEFAZIO, and Mr. MCHENRY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a reduced rate of excise tax on beer produced domestically by certain qualifying producers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Brewer Rein5 vestment and Expanding Workforce Act’’ or as the ‘‘Small 

6 BREW Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 494 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCED RATE OF EXCISE TAX ON BEER PRO2 DUCED DOMESTICALLY BY CERTAIN QUALI3 FYING PRODUCERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 5051(a) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and 

7 (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively, and 

8 (2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting 

9 the following new subparagraphs: 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a brew11 er who produces not more than 6,000,000 bar12 rels of beer during the calendar year, the per 

13 barrel rate of tax imposed by this section shall 

14 be— 

15 ‘‘(i) $3.50 on the first 60,000 quali16 fied barrels of production, and 

17 ‘‘(ii) $16 on the first 1,940,000 quali18 fied barrels of production to which clause 

19 (i) does not apply. 

20 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED BARRELS OF PRODUC21 TION.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

22 term ‘qualified barrels of production’ means, 

23 with respect to any brewer for any calendar 

24 year, the number of barrels of beer which are 

25 removed in such year for consumption or sale 

26 and which have been brewed or produced by 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 494 IH

1 such brewer at qualified breweries in the United 

2 States.’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 5051(a)(2) of 

5 such Code, as redesignated by this section, is 

6 amended— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘2,000,000 barrel quan8 tity’’ and inserting ‘‘6,000,000 barrel quantity’’, 

9 and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘60,000 barrel quantity’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘60,000 and 1,940,000 barrel 

12 quantities’’. 

13 (2) Subparagraph (D) of such section, as so re14 designated, is amended by striking ‘‘2,000,000 bar15 rels’’ and inserting ‘‘6,000,000 barrels’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to beer removed during calendar 

18 years beginning after the date of the enactment of this 

19 Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF PRESIDENT AND CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gail Montgomery, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutrition 21, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2005

Gail Montgomery
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       16
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00381

- CV

LINDA MARTIN DAVIS APPELLANT

V.

THE HILLS APARTMENTS APPELLEE

------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2014

- 005529

- 1

----------- -


### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------
On December 4, 2014, we notified appellant in accordance with rule of

appellate procedure 42.3(c) that if she did not pay the $195 filing fee for her

appeal by December 15, 2014, her appeal would be subject to dismissal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). After the trial court sustained a contest to appellant’s

affidavit of indigence, we notified appellant on December 17, 2014, and on

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

December 30, 2014, that her appeal would be dismissed unless she paid the

$195 filing fee. See id. Appellant has not paid the $1 9 5 filing fee. See Tex. R.

App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 16 , 20 13
, 2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: SUDDERTH, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: January 22 , 2015

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals

, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- district Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 13

- 9127 (Aug. 16 , 20 13 ) (listing fees in courts o f appeals).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF PHOENIX MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                             1
<CASH>                                                    821
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       2,158,519<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                         2,290,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    4,449,910
<PP&E>                                              4,283,656<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      8,733,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               5,981,789
<BONDS>                                             2,174,636
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              245,962
<OTHER-SE>                                            331,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        8,733,566
<SALES>                                             7,463,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,004
<CGS>                                               6,508,083
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       6,508,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      870,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    310,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (222,338)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (222,338)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.10)
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS NET AMOUNT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

REX American Resources Corporation
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned officers of REX American Resources Corporation (the Company)
hereby certify, to their knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2010 which this certificate accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

/s/ Stuart A. Rose
Stuart A. RoseChairman
of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Douglas L. Bruggeman
Douglas L. BruggemanVice
President, Finance, Treasurer andChief
Financial Officer

Dated: December 9, 2010

---
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2320    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 15:12:09    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2320    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 15:12:09    Page 2 of2
`

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00076-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF E.X.H. AND S.M.H., CHILDREN 

 

On Appeal from the 100th District Court 

Carson County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 11978, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding 

 

February 21, 2019 

 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ. 

J.H. appealed from an order terminating his parental rights to E.X.H. and S.M.H. 

The appellate record has been filed. Furthermore, the extended deadline by which he 

had to file an appellate brief lapsed without him filing the document. Consequently, we 

abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 100th District Court of Carson County (trial 

court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following:

1. whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appellant is indigent;

 

3. whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due 

to counsel’s failure to timely file an appellate brief, see Ex parte Briggs, 187 

S.W.3d 458, 467 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that “a reasonably 

competent attorney—regardless of whether he is retained or appointed—
2

must seek to advance his client’s best defense in a reasonably competent 

manner”); and

4. whether new counsel should be appointed.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a 

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by March 1, 2019,

due to the time-sensitive nature of appeals from parental termination orders. If it is 

determined that appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has been 

denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new counsel;

the name, address, email address, and phone number of any new counsel appointed 

shall be included in the aforementioned findings. Should further time be needed to 

perform these tasks, then same must be requested before March 1, 2019.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam