alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit B page 126 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 1

of 25
Exhibit B page 127 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 2

of 25
Exhibit B page 128 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 3

of 25
Exhibit B page 129 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 4

of 25
Exhibit B page 130 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 5

of 25
Exhibit B page 131 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 6

of 25
Exhibit B page 132 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 7

of 25
Exhibit B page 133 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 8

of 25
Exhibit B page 134 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 9

of 25
Exhibit B page 135 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 10

of 25
Exhibit B page 136 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 11

of 25

Exhibit B page 138 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 13

of 25
Exhibit B page 139 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 14

of 25
Exhibit B page 140 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 15

of 25
Exhibit B page 141 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 16

of 25
Exhibit B page 142 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 17

of 25
Exhibit B page 143 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 18

of 25
Exhibit B page 144 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 19

of 25
Exhibit B page 145 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 20

of 25
Exhibit B page 146 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 21

of 25
Exhibit B page 147 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 22

of 25
Exhibit B page 148 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 23

of 25
Exhibit B page 149 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 24

of 25
Exhibit B page 150 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-7 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 25

of 25
### SCPW-15-0000555
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

DIANNA NALANI KUPAHU, Petitioner,

vs. BERT I. AYABE, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai # i, Respondent Judge,
and HALE AUPUNI COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION; JOHN DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1- 50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-50; DOE ENTITIES 1-

50; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-50, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIVIL NO. 12-1-2882-11)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J
. , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J
. )



### Upon consideration of Petitioner Dianna Nalani Kupahu’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on August 3, 2015, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that Petitioner is not entitled to a writ of mandamus inasmuch as she fails to demonstrate that she has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief or that she lacks alternative means to seek relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-15-0000555 11-AUG-2015 12:43 PM

### an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner

demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Petitioner may, as appropriate, seek relief in an appeal from a final judgment entered relating to the foreclosure sale or in her pending appeal in CAAP-15- 0000447. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 11, 2015. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Alan Kirschbaum, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to my
knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ ALAN J. KIRSCHBAUM
----------------------
Alan J. Kirschbaum
Principal Financial Officer
November 13, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,378,145
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             8,960,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 13,596,981
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      15,509,978
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        15,320,000
<LOANS>                                     42,749,825
<ALLOWANCE>                                    837,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,218,579
<DEPOSITS>                                  76,870,406
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,416,882
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,055,492
<LONG-TERM>                                    900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,749,508
<COMMON>                                       336,760
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,889,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              87,218,579
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,671,916
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              428,402
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               172,837
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,671,916
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             462,249
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             574,447
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,972,041
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                (874,572)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,459,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                876,901
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     876,901
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   876,901
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,275,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,622,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                611,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               765,561
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  215,253
<RECOVERIES>                                 1,162,020
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              837,756
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           837,756
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 14, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41054

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODNEY DEWAYNE MCMORRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:04-CR-74-3

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Dewayne Morris

has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McMorris has filed

a response in which he requests the appointment of new counsel. 

The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal based on

McMorris’s appeal waiver.

Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and

Morris’s reply discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. 

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
No. 05-41054

-2-

excused from further responsibilities, defendant’s motion for

appointment of new counsel is DENIED, the Government’s motion to

dismiss is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
Exhibit 5 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2361-5 Filed: 06/03/19 Entered: 06/03/19 17:47:43 Page 1

of 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

NextEra Energy, Inc. 

NextEra Energy Partners, L.P. 

 

 v. 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

 Docket No. EL19-35-001

ORDER GRANTING REHEARING FOR

FURTHER CONSIDERATION

(March 26, 2019)

Rehearing has been timely requested of the Commission's order issued on 

January 25, 2019, in this proceeding. NextEra Energy, Inc. and NextEra Energy 

Partners, L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 166 FERC ¶ 61,049 (2019). 

In the absence of Commission action within 30 days from the date the rehearing 

request was filed, the request for rehearing (and any timely requests for rehearing 

filed subsequently)1 would be deemed denied. 18 C.F.R. § 385.713 (2018).

In order to afford additional time for consideration of the matters raised or to be 

raised, rehearing of the Commission's order is hereby granted for the limited purpose of 

further consideration, and timely-filed rehearing requests will not be deemed denied by 

operation of law. Rehearing requests of the above-cited order filed in this proceeding 

will be addressed in a future order. As provided in 18 C.F.R. § 385.713(d), no answers to 

the rehearing requests will be entertained. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

 

1

See San Diego Gas & Electric Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary 

Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent System Operator and the 

California Power Exchange, 95 FERC ¶ 61,173 (2001) (clarifying that a single tolling 

order applies to all rehearing requests that were timely filed).

20190326-3041 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 03/26/2019

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2361-5 Filed: 06/03/19 Entered: 06/03/19 17:47:43 Page 2

of 2
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1673    Filed: 04/25/19    Entered: 04/25/19 07:49:32    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1673    Filed: 04/25/19    Entered: 04/25/19 07:49:32    Page 2 of2
#### Ruth Smith, Petitioner, v James D. Bowen, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Saratoga County,

July 1, 1987

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Mylo Eytino*for petitioner. *Arne Heggen, County Attorney (Mark M. Rider*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Loren N. Brown, J.

This proceeding has been commenced pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to perform his duties as Sheriff of the County of Saratoga. The proceeding was commenced by an order to show cause but without a verified petition.

The petitioner was granted an order by the Family Court for the County of Albany directing the entry of a judgment against her husband for arrears for child support. The order recited that the support provisions could be enforced pursuant to CPLR 5241 and 5242. The petitioner’s attorney prepared an income execution by amending a form, which was suitable for enforcement of judgment pursuant to CPLR 5221 and 5222, to *856purportedly comply with CPLR 5241 and 5242. The purported execution sought 50% of the judgment debtor’s weekly after-tax income. The employees of the respondent refused to enforce the income execution, except in the amount of 10%, pursuant to CPLR 5231, and the respondent’s attorney returned the execution to the petitioner with the comment that the form as modified did not contain the information required by CPLR 5241, and that the judgment was not the type that may be the subject of an income execution pursuant to CPLR 5241. The respondent now opposes the relief requested on the foregoing ground, and on the additional ground that the petitioner’s papers do not include a verified petition in violation of CPLR 7804.

Initially, the court will treat the petition as if it had been properly brought.

Addressing the merits, an execution may be issued and served, pursuant to CPLR 5241, only if there exists an "order of support”. CPLR 5241 (a) (1) provides: "1. 'Order of support’ means any temporary or final order, judgment or decree in a matrimonial action or family court proceeding, or any foreign support order, judgment or decree, registered pursuant to section thirty-seven-a of the domestic relations law which directs the payment of alimony, maintenance, support or child support.” The judgment obtained by the plaintiff, however, does not direct payment; it states only an amount to which the plaintiff is entitled. Therefore, an execution may not be issued pursuant to CPLR 5241, based on that judgment.

The petitioner’s reliance on the order of Family Court, which directed that the plaintiff could enforce its order pursuant to CPLR 5241 and 5242, is understandable but misplaced. The respondent was not a party to the action which resulted in that order, and is not bound by it.

Moreover, even if a support order, as defined by CPLR 5241 (a) (1), existed, the proposed execution did not contain the statutorily required information. Specifically, the execution fails to give certain notices to the debtor as required by CPLR 5241 (c) (4) and (e).

Accordingly, the petition is denied. Any funds collected pursuant to this execution should be returned to the judgment debtor.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Exhibit A-4 

Nair & Levin, P.C. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2509-4 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:04:45 Page 1

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2509-4 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:04:45 Page 2

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2509-4 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:04:45 Page 3

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2509-4 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:04:45 Page 4

of 5
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2509-4 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:04:45 Page 5

of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4812 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4812

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the Administrator of 
 the Transportation Security Administration to establish a process for 
  providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services for 
veterans traveling to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor 
                 their service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honor Flight Act''.

SEC. 2. HONOR FLIGHT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
after section 44927 the following new section:
``Sec. 44928. Honor Flight program
    ``The Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration 
shall establish, in collaboration with the Honor Flight Network or 
other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, a process for 
providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services for 
veterans traveling on an Honor Flight Network private charter, or such 
other not-for-profit organization that honors veterans, to visit war 
memorials built and dedicated to honor the service of such veterans.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
44927 the following new item:

``44928. Honor Flight program.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4812

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the Administrator of 
 the Transportation Security Administration to establish a process for 
  providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services for 
veterans traveling to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor 
                 their service, and for other purposes.
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2578

To suspend temporarily the duty on Isoxaflutole.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 17, 2000

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Isoxaflutole.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ISOXAFLUTOLE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by striking heading 9902.29.70 and inserting the

7 following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.70 4-(2-

methanesulphonyl-4-

triflouromethylbenzoyl)-5-

cyclopropyl

isoxazole (CAS

No. 141112–29–

0) (provided for

in subheading

2934.90.15) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•S 2578 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to articles entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2023-4(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: WilmingtonTrust, National Association. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 29, 2024**
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4919 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4919

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 715 Shawan Falls Drive in Dublin, Ohio, as the ``Lance Corporal Wesley 
   G. Davids and Captain Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL WESLEY G. DAVIDS AND CAPTAIN NICHOLAS J. 
ROZANSKI MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 715 Shawan Falls Drive in Dublin, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lance Corporal Wesley G. Davids and Captain 
Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Wesley G. Davids and Captain Nicholas J. Rozanski Memorial 
Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC.

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Summit Bancshares,
Inc. (the "Issuer").

I, Philip E. Norwood, the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
the Issuer certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m(a) or
          78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated: November 1, 2003

                                /s/ Philip E. Norwood
                                ------------------------------------------------
                          Name: Philip E. Norwood
                          Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 1st day of November 2003.

                                /s/ Karen S. Appel
                                ------------------------------------------------
                          Name: Karen S. Appel
                          Title: Notary Public

My commission expires:  August 5, 2006



                                       42