alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 30366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Alpine County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Alpine County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold 
a meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 15th, and will begin at 6 p.m. 
The meeting will be held in Alpine County at the Alpine Early Learning 
Center, 100 Foothill Road, Markleeville, CA 96120.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Morris, RAC Coordinator, USDA, 
Hurnboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Carson Ranger District, 1536 S. 
Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701 (775) 884-8140; E-Mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0460656a6d6168696b76766d774462772a6261602a7177"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="294d4847404c4544465b5b405a694f5a074f4c4d075c5a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Update on recommended projects (2) Determine parameters and timeframes 
for next round of projects (3) Discuss Charter Renewal (4) Public 
Comment. The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity 
will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address 
the Committee at that time.

    Dated: May 21, 2010.
Genny E. Wilson,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-12864 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

I, Nabeela Ahmad, do declare and state as follows:

1. I am employed at Prime Clerk LLC (“Prime Clerk”), the claims and noticing agent

for the debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On June 11, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime

Clerk caused the following document to be served via First Class Mail on the parties identified on 

the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A:

• Order Extending Time to Assume or Reject Unexpired Leases of Nonresidential Real

Property [Docket No. 2227]

3. On June 11, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime

Clerk caused the following document to be served via First Class Mail on the parties identified on 

the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B:

• Order Enlarging the Time within which to File Notices of Removal of Related

Proceedings [Docket No. 2278]

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2510 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:24:44 Page 1 of

6
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2510 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:24:44 Page 2 of

6
Exhibit A 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2510 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:24:44 Page 3 of

6
Exhibit A

Supplemental Mailing List

Served via First Class Mail

MMLID Name Address1 Address2 City State Postal Code

1023164 ARBOR TREE SURGERY COMPANY 5004 SHADOW CANYON RD TEMPLETON CA 93465-9714

4976186 Broyles, James 4170 Webster Ranch Rd Corona CA 92881-4760

4975505 Hansen, Sig 1151 Secret Lake Loop Lincoln CA 95648-8402

4975281 Hartman 550 W Plumb LN #8407 Reno NV 89509-3468

4975537 Little, David 590 E MAGNOLIA AVE PORTOLA CA 96122-6701

4974817 Peninsula Village Homeowners Association Doris Snow 12402 S Carriage Hill Way Nampa ID 83686-5690

4975005 Pilegard, Cris 1739 E Terrace Ave Fresno CA 93703-1737

4975863 Wallace 1515 Caughlin Creek Rd Reno NV 89519-0677

In re: PG&E Corporation, et al.

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2510 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:24:44 Page 4 of

6
Exhibit B

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2510 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:24:44 Page 5 of

6
Exhibit A

Supplemental Mailing List

Served via First Class Mail

MMLID Name Address1 Address2 Address3 City State Postal Code

5001461 Brown, John Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai LLP Geoffrey Spellberg, Louise H. Renne 555 Capitol Mall Ste 600 Sacramento CA 95814-4581

5001464 Gunst, Karen Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai LLP Geoffrey Spellberg, Louise H. Renne 555 Capitol Mall Ste 600 Sacramento CA 95814-4581

In re: PG&E Corporation, et al.

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) Page 1 of 1

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2510 Filed: 06/13/19 Entered: 06/13/19 12:24:44 Page 6 of

6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,875
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     57,232
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          38,352
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            39,641
<LOANS>                                        328,599
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 461,916
<DEPOSITS>                                     386,257
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,958
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,996
<LONG-TERM>                                     21,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,611
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 461,916
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,786
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,360
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   507
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                35,653
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,629
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,249
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           18,404
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 158
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,588
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,588
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,931
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.74
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,109
<LOANS-PAST>                                       161
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,291
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      970
<RECOVERIES>                                       184
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,640
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,326
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            314
        

</TABLE>
1

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF CONTINUED PERFECTION OF MECHANIC’S LIEN

Case No. 19-30088 DM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Debtors.

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 19-30088 DM (Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered with Case No. 

19-30089)

Chapter 11

NOTICE OF CONTINUED 

PERFECTION OF MECHANIC’S 

LIEN [11 USC §546(b)(2)]

Creditor William Kreysler & Associates, Inc., hereby gives notice of continued 

perfection of its mechanic’s lien under 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)(2). Creditor timely recorded 

its $74,280.00 mechanic’s lien for labor and materials against real property owned by the 

debtors herein, located at 538 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109. A copy of said lien

is attached hereto. Under California law, an action to enforce such a lien must be filed 

within 90 days of recording in order to remain valid. Creditor is prevented by the 

automatic stay of this proceeding from filing an action and maintaining the perfection of 

its mechanic’s lien. Accordingly, under 11 U.S.C. § 546(b)(2), Creditor hereby maintains 

its perfection by this notice. The filing of this notice is not intended to be an admission 

Michael Rogers, State Bar No. 122450

LAMBERT & ROGERS, APLC

359 West Madison Avenue, Suite 100

El Cajon, CA 92020

(619) 588-7600; Fax: (619) 588-7889

E-mail: mrogers@lambertrogers.com

Attorney Pro Hac Vice for Creditor

WILLIAM KREYSLER & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1924 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 14:18:06 Page 1 of

2
2

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF CONTINUED PERFECTION OF MECHANIC’S LIEN

Case No. 19-30088 DM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

that the filing is required to maintain perfection.

Date: May 8, 2019

Lambert & Rogers, APLC

By: /s/ Michael Rogers

Michael Rogers

Attorney Pro Hac Vice for Creditor

WILLIAM KREYSLER & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1924 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 14:18:06 Page 2 of

2
**EXHIBIT 10.3**

 

**CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT**

 

**CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED AS TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT.  EACH SUCH PORTION, WHICH HAS BEEN OMITTED HEREIN AND REPLACED WITH AN ASTERISK [*], HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.**

 

September 17, 2010

 

**By Email **& **Courier**

Tibor Keler, Ph.D.

Vice President for R&D and Chief Scientific Officer

Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

222 Cameron Drive

Philipsburg, NJ 08865

 

Re: Commercial License for CD27 Antibodies

 

Dear Tibor:

 

Pursuant to Section 4.4.2 of the Research and Commercialization Agreement (the “Agreement”) between Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (“Celldex”), Medarex, Inc. and GenPharm International, Inc. (together “Medarex,” now a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company), effective as of April 6, 2004, as amended, Medarex hereby grants to Celldex a Commercial License with respect to the Antibody [*] (plus two back up Antibodies [*] and [*]) raised against the Research Antigen CD27.

 

To facilitate the payment of the Commercial License fee pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Agreement, attached is our invoice, No. MEDX-2010030.

 

Please note that Medarex was recently acquired by Bristol-Myers Squibb; thus, this invoice includes new remittance instructions for payments to Medarex, which we ask that you conform to going forward. My contact information including my address and phone number is also included on the invoice.

 
| Sincerely yours,                            |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        |   |
| /s/ Chris White                             |   |
| Chris White                                 |   |
| Associate Director - R & D Finance |   |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb                        |   |

 

Attachment

 
| Cc:    | Anthony Marucci - Celldex |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Art Bertelsen - BMS       |
|   | Tom Nettl - BMS           |

 

----

* Confidential

 

----
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ICOA,  Inc. and  Subsidiaries  (the
Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Erwin Vahlsing, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.
Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and
Director (Principal Accounting Officer)
May 20, 2003
y



### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00 562

- CV

ROY KEITH COBLE , Appellant

V.

KELLY DIANNE ADAMS , Appellee

Appeal from the 257 th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2003

- 06447 ).

TO THE 2 57 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 20 th day of November 2014 , the case upon appeal to revise

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by

the trial court on April 2 , 2013 . After submitting the case on

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the

parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains

no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial

court’s judgment.

The Court ord ers that the appellant, Roy Keith Coble

, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.Judgment rendered November 20

, 2014.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings

and Keyes . Opinio n delivered by Justice Jennings.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

March 6, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




**CERTIFICATIONS**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Paul
      Intlekofer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
      his knowledge:




(1) The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Paul
              IntlekoferPaul
              IntlekoferPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 14, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.01**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-99777and Form S-3 No. 33-99777-01) and related Prospectuses of Crescent Real Estate Equities LimitedPartnership and Crescent Finance Company of our reports dated March 26, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedules of Crescent Real Estate Equities LimitedPartnership, Crescent Real Estate Limited Partnership management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership, included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.ERNST & YOUNG LLPDallas, Texas
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
             RALI SERIES 2006-QO10 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:   Executive Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4751 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4751

  To make technical corrections to Public Law 110-229 to reflect the 
renaming of the Bainbridge Island Japanese American Exclusion Memorial, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2014

  Mr. Kilmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make technical corrections to Public Law 110-229 to reflect the 
renaming of the Bainbridge Island Japanese American Exclusion Memorial, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BAINBRIDGE ISLAND JAPANESE AMERICAN EXCLUSION MEMORIAL.

    Section 313 of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 
(Public Law 110-229) is amended as follows:
            (1) In the heading of subsection (b), by striking 
        ``Japanese American Memorial'' and inserting ``Japanese 
        American Exclusion Memorial''.
            (2) In the heading of subsection (c)(5)(C), by striking 
        ``Japanese american memorial'' and inserting ``Japanese 
        american exclusion memorial''.
            (3) In subsection (c)(5)(C), by striking ``Japanese 
        American Memorial'' and inserting ``Japanese American Exclusion 
        Memorial''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Thomas Jones, Appellant.

*Lotteries*— *distinction between lottery policies and lottery tickets*— *judge’s eha/i'ge submitting the question to the jury*— *proof necessa/ry to sustain a conviction.*

'The statute recognizes a distinction between lottery policies and lottery tickets, hut it does not state in what it consists. It assumes that somebody knows and that the distinction is susceptible of proof, and that court's and juries must have proof on that subject before they can convict a person charged with - violating the statute.

Upon the trial of an indictment for selling lottery policies there was proof given that the paper in question was what is commonly known as a lottery policy. The court, notwithstanding such proof, submitted that question of fact to the jury, accompanied by the statement that *it was not a ticket.*

*Held,*that the trial judge erred in charging the jury that the paper in question was not a lottery ticket, and that as it did not appear that the ruling was not prejudicial to the defendant a new trial should be granted.

Brown, P. J., dissenting.

*13Appeal by tlie defendant, Thomas Jones, from a judgment of the Court of Sessions of Kings county, rendered on the 4th day of January, 1895, upon the verdict of a jury convicting the defendant of the crime of vending and selling to another what are commonly known as and called lottery policies, and also from an order made on the 4th day of January, 1895, denying the defendant’s motion, for a new trial.

*James & Thomas H. Troy,*for the appellant.

*James W. Ridgway, District*Attorney, for the respondent.

Pratt, J.:

I regret to express the conviction that the learned trial judge-erred in telling the jury that the paper in question was not a lottery ticket. True, the defendant was indicted for selling lottery policies, and in one sense it may be said that it was immaterial what the paper was so long as it was not a lottery policy. But the trouble is precisely this : The statute recognizes a distinction between lottery policies and lottery tickets, but does not state in what it consists. It assumes that somebody knows and that the distinction is susceptible of proof, and that courts and juries must have proof on that subject before they can convict. There was proof here that the paper in question was what is commonly known as a lottery policy. The court, notwithstanding this proof, submitted that question of fact to the jury, accompanied by the statement that *it was not a ticket.*This was apparently a ruling of law the tendency of which was to help prevent the jury from entertaining a reasonable doubt whether or not the paper was a lottery policy. *Non*constat, since the question was submitted to them, but that the jury might otherwise have entertained a reasonable doubt whether this paper was a ticket or a. policy.

I am not able to say that this ruling did not prejudice defendant on the other questions.

A new trial should, therefore, be granted.

Dykman, J., concurred; Brown, P. J., dissented.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted.