alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended  Quarterly  Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, James A. Hayward,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report  fairly   presents,  in
                all material respects,  the financial  condition  and  result of
                operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Applied  DNA  Sciences,  Inc.  and will be  retained by Applied DNA
Sciences,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date:  October 10, 2006                                  By: /s/JAMES A HAYWARD
                                                            -------------------
                                                         James A. Hayward
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Cadmus Communications Corporation, certify that, to the
best of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadmus Communications Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Bruce V. Thomas                   |  |  |  | /s/ Paul K. Suijk                                
|Bruce V. Thomas                       |  |  |  | Paul K. Suijk                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)     
|                                      |  | 
|May 12, 2006                          |  |  |  | May 12, 2006
Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

MASCOTECH, INC.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividends
(Dollars in thousands)

                                6 Months 
                                  Ended    
                                June 30,            For The Years Ended December 31        
                                  1997      1996      1995       1994      1993      1992  
<S>                             <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>               
Earnings (Loss) Before Income
  Taxes and Fixed Charges:

  Income (loss) from continuing
    operations before income
    taxes (credit), 
    extraordinary item and     
    cumulative effect of    
    accounting change, net..... $ 94,880  $ 77,220  $100,280  $(264,490) $121,180  $ 68,250 

  Deduct equity in
    undistributed earnings
    of less-than-fifty-
    percent owned companies....  (30,870)  (31,650)  (29,590)   (23,350)  (19,930)  (21,760)
  Add interest on
    indebtedness, net..........   19,820    30,350    51,500     51,290    83,000    87,830
  Add amortization of debt
    expense....................      440     1,490     1,670      3,450     4,390     1,930
  Estimated interest factor
    for rentals................    1,120     6,350     7,070      6,220     5,550     5,740
  Earnings (loss) before income
    taxes and fixed charges.... $ 85,390  $ 83,760  $130,930  $(226,880) $194,190  $141,990

Fixed Charges:

  Interest on indebtedness,
    net........................ $ 19,880  $ 30,590  $ 51,690  $  51,540  $ 83,110  $ 87,980
  Amortization of debt
    expense....................      440     1,490     1,670      3,450     4,390     1,930
  Estimated interest factor
    for rentals................    1,120     6,350     7,070      6,220     5,550     5,740

      Total fixed charges......   21,440    38,430    60,430     61,210    93,050    95,650

  Preferred stock dividend
    requirement (a)............   10,330    21,570    21,970     14,630    25,860    17,140

  Combined fixed charges and
    preferred stock dividends.. $ 31,770  $ 60,000  $ 82,400  $  75,840  $118,910  $112,790

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges................   4.0       2.2       2.2         -- (b)   2.1       1.5   

Ratio of earnings to combined
  fixed charges and preferred
  stock dividends..............   2.7       1.4       1.6         -- (c)   1.6       1.3   




  (a) Represents amount of income before provision for income taxes required to meet the preferred stock dividend requirements
      of the Company and its 50% owned companies.
  (b) 1994 results of operations are inadequate to cover fixed charges by $288,090.
  (c) 1994 results of operations are inadequate to cover combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends by $302,720.
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Shared Hospital Services for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.




Ernest A.
Bates, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer and Craig K. Tagawa, the Chief
Financial Officer of American Shared Hospital Services, each certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge:




1.           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of American Shared Hospital
Services.




November
15, 2010




/s/ Ernest A. Bates,
M.D.Ernest
      A. Bates, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer/s/ Craig K. TagawaCraig
      K. TagawaChief
      Financial Officer
#### Johanna Steinhauer, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Anna B. Acker, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). LA / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T NG HI XU AN T R AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73741 A ge nc yN o. A 042- 184- 405 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. N ghi X uan T r an, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of V i e tna m , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is s p e c ia l m o tio n to s e e k§ 2 1 2 ( c ) r e lie f . 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSL A/ Res ea r ch 07- 73741 2 W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , A vi la-Sa nchez v . Mukasey , 5 0 9 F .3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 ( 9 th C i r . 2007) , and w e gr antthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w and r e m and. W e r em and t o the B IA t o exp l ai n i t s r ea sons for denyi ng T ran’ s s peci al m ot i on t o see k § 21 2(c) re l i ef fi l ed pu rs uantt o 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 44 (d). See Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . T h e B I A ap p e ar s to have deni ed T ran’ s m ot i on because he c ho se no tt o fi l e an app l i cat i on for a § 2 1 2 ( c ) w a iv e ra t h is h e ar in g in 2 0 0 3 , b u t d o e s n o t e x p la in o n w h a t g r o u n d s th is b ar s th e s ub s e q u e n t f

ilin g o f as p e c ia l m o tio n to s e e ks u c h r e lie f . See 8 C. F. R. § 1003. 44( d) ( “ A m ot i on unde rthi s s e c t i on w i l lnotbe gr ant e d w i th r e s pe c tt o any co n v i ct i o n w h ere an al i en h as pr e v i ous l ybe e n de ni e d sect i o n 2 1 2 (c) reli ef b y a i m m i gr a t i on j udge orbythe B oar d on disc re t i on ary g r o u n d s .” ) ( e m p h a s is a d d e d ) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW G R A N TED ; R EM A N D ED .
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT


 


TO


 


OFFER
LETTER


 


This
Amendment to Offer Letter (the “Amendment”) is dated as of the 16th day of June, 2016 (the
“Effective Date”) by and between RELMADA THERAPEUTICS, Inc.
(“Relmada”), and Michael Becker (“Employee”). Capitalized terms
use but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed in the Offer Letter (as herein defined).


 


R
E C I T A L S


  


WHEREAS,
Relmada and Employee entered into that certain Offer Letter (the “Offer Letter”), dated October 14,
2014; and


 


WHEREAS,
Relmada and Employee desire to amend the Offer Letter as set forth herein.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Relmada and Employee agree as follows:


 


1.      The
Offer Letter is hereby amended as follows:


 


(a)Section
7(b). “At-Will Employment and Termination of Employment” shall be deleted and replaced as follows:


 


“(b)
Upon Termination for cause you shall be immediately paid all accrued salary, bonuses, incentive compensation to the extent earned,
vested deferred compensation pension plan and profit sharing plan benefits, which will he paid in accordance with the applicable
plan, and accrued vacation pay, all to the date of termination. In the event of termination other than for cause, you will be
entitled to severance equal to six months of base salary and health benefits. For the avoidance of doubt, if you are terminated
for cause, you shall not be entitled to any severance payments or health benefits.”


 


2.      Full
Force And Effect and Ratification. Any and all of the terms and provisions of the Offer Letter shall, except as expressly
amended and modified hereby, remain in full force and effect. The Offer Letter, as amended pursuant to this Amendment, is hereby
ratified by Relmada and Employee. From and after the date hereof, references to the Offer Letter shall be deemed to include this
Amendment.


 


3.      Conflicts.
In the event that any of the provisions of this Amendment conflict with the provisions of the Contract, the provisions of this
Amendment shall govern and control.


 


4.      Governing
Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of New
York, without respect to its principles of conflict of law.


 


 


[Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page Follows]


 




     

     

    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as
of the Effective Date.


 


	 	RELMADA
    THERAPEUTICS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Sergio Traversa
	                                                                                   	 	Name:  Sergio
    Traversa
	 	 	Title:    Chief
    Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
    Michael Becker
	                                                                            	 	Michael
    Becker


 


 


 


2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,832,013
<SECURITIES>                                 6,040,430
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,422
<PP&E>                                      22,096,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,387,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,141,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,358,451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,783,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,141,869
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               961,849
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,009,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (47,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (47,298)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (47,298)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (47,298)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4976 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4976

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory 
 Commission to minimize infringement on the exercise and enjoyment of 
property rights in issuing hydropower licenses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2014

Mr. Hurt (for himself, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Luetkemeyer, 
 Mr. Lankford, and Mrs. Hartzler) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory 
 Commission to minimize infringement on the exercise and enjoyment of 
property rights in issuing hydropower licenses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Home Owner Rights 
Enforcement Act''.

SEC. 2. HYDROPOWER LICENSES.

    (a) Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)) is 
amended--
            (1) by designating the first, second, and third sentences 
        as paragraphs (1) through (3) respectively; and
            (2) in paragraph (3) (as so designated)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' after ``recreational 
                opportunities,''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, and minimizing infringement on 
                the useful exercise and enjoyment of property rights 
                held by nonlicensees'' after ``aspects of environmental 
                quality''.
    (b) Section 10 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ``, including 
        minimizing infringement on the useful exercise and enjoyment of 
        property rights held by nonlicensees'' after ``section 4(e)''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(k) Private Landownership.--In developing any recreational 
resource within the project boundary, the licensee shall consider 
private landownership as a means to encourage and facilitate--
            ``(1) private investment; and
            ``(2) increased tourism and recreational use.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STIRES FRITTS, Respondent, *v.*CALVIN SLADE, Appellant.

*Arrest*— fraud—statute *of limitations*— *maided by payments.*

This action was brought upon a promissory note given in 1869, but upon which payments had. been made within six years. Alter the time to answer had expired, plaintiff procured an order of arrest, on an affidavit that the note was given for the balance of a credit for goods sold to the defendant in 1868, upon fraudulent representations then made by him. *Held*(1), that as this action was upon the note, an order of arrest could not be procured on the ground that the debt for which it was given was fraudulently incurred; (2), that the claim arising from the fraud was barred by the statute of limitations, and that the payment kept alive the note alone, and not the fraud.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order of arrest.

*F. B. Van Vlecle,*for tbe appellant.

*P. JD.*Gibbs, for the respondent.

Baenaed, P. J.:

In August, 1868, the defendant is charged by plaintiff with having made a false representation to him as to his property, with an intent to obtain merchandise of plaintiff on credit. That soon thereafter, goods were delivered from time to time and large payments made thereon as the time of the credits expired, until the 26th of May, 1869, when the account was closed, and on a settlement thereof, the defendant gave to the plaintiff his promissory *146note for $274.16, payable one month after date. The note was not ■paid, but payment has been made thereon within six years. The plaintiff, in January, 1876, brought an action upon this. note. The defendant made no answer, and after the time for answering expired obtained an order of arrest upon an affidavit charging fraud in the month of August, 1868, by means of which the business dealing commenced between the parties.

I think this remedy does not exist in this case. The action is upon the note. No fraud is claimed as to that. An arrest is not authorized for a fraud, whereby a prior and different obligation was incurred to pay the same money. *(Mallory*v. Leach, 23 How., 507; *Merchants' Bank*v. Dwight, 13 id., 366; *Alliance Ins. Co.*v. Cleveland, 14 id., 408.) The statute of limitations furnishes another and a complete defense to this order. The fraud, if any, was perpetrated over six years before this action was commenced. The note itself would be barred, but for the payment upon it; payment upon the note does not revive and keep alive a fraud. *(Oothout v. Thompson,*20 Johns., 277.)

The order should be reversed and the order of arrest vacated, with costs of the motion at Special Term and upon appeal, besides disbursements, to be deducted from the plaintiff’s claim.

Pbatt and DyKMAN, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4695 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4695

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to add sleep apnea 
  screening to the initial preventive physical examination under the 
                           Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2014

 Mr. Burgess (for himself and Mr. Rush) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to add sleep apnea 
  screening to the initial preventive physical examination under the 
                           Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDING SLEEP APNEA SCREENING TO THE INITIAL PREVENTIVE 
              PHYSICAL EXAMINATION UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395x) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (ww)(2), by adding at the end the 
        following new subparagraph:
            ``(O) Sleep apnea screening (as defined in subsection 
        (iii)).''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:

                        ``Sleep Apnea Screening

    ``(iii) The term `sleep apnea screening' means, with respect to an 
individual, a determination based upon information that is obtained 
with respect to the individual through an appropriate questionnaire as 
to whether the individual is at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea. 
Such determination shall be evidence-based and shall be made in 
accordance with recognized clinical guidelines or such other guidelines 
as the Secretary determines appropriate in consultation with 
appropriate medical organizations.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
initial preventive physical examinations performed on or after January 
1, 2016.
                                 <all>
```