1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTE TL E R L LP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

EXHIBIT 1 

WEISBROT DECLARATION 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 1

of 62
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Robert A. Julian (SBN 99469) 

Cecily A. Dumas (SBN 111449) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

1160 Battery Street, Suite 100 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: 628.208.6434 

Facsimile: 310.820.8859 

Email: rjulian@bakerlaw.com 

Email: cdumas@bakerlaw.com 

Eric E. Sagerman (SBN 155496) 

Lauren T. Attard (SBN 320898) 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

11601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1400 

Los Angeles, CA 90025-0509 

Telephone: 310.442.8875 

Facsimile: 310.820.8859 

Email: esagerman@bakerlaw.com 

Email: lattard@bakerlaw.com 

Counsel for Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors, 

□ Affects PG&E Corporation 

□ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

■ Affects both Debtors 

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead 

Case, No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter Number: 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

DECLARATION OF STEVEN WEISBROT IN 

SUPPORT OF OBJECTION OF THE 

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TORT 

CLAIMANTS TO MOTION OF THE 

DEBTORS FOR ORDER (I) ESTABLISHING 

DEADLINE FOR FILING PROOFS OF 

CLAIM, (II) ESTABLISHING THE FORM 

AND MANNER OF NOTICE THEREOF, AND 

(III) APPROVING PROCEDURES FOR 

PROVIDING NOTICE OF BAR DATE AND 

OTHER INFORMATION TO ALL 

CREDITORS AND POTENTIAL CREDITORS 

(DKT. NO. 1784)

Date: June 11, 2019 

Time: 9:30 a.m. (Pacific Time) 

Place: United States Bankruptcy Court 

 Courtroom 17, 16th Floor 

 San Francisco, CA 94102 

Objection Deadline: May 31, 2019 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 2

of 62
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STEVEN WEISBROT declares as follows under penalty of perjury 

1. I am a partner at the class action notice and settlement administration firm Angeion 

Group, LLC (“Angeion”). 

2. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein except as to matters where I 

indicate otherwise, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true. If called upon to testify, I 

could and would competently do so. I make this declaration in support of the (1) Objection (the 

“Objection”) of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants (the “TCC”) to the Motion of the 

Debtors for an Order (i) Establishing Deadline for Filing Proofs of Claim, (ii) Establishing the Form 

and Manner of Notice Thereof, and (iii) Approving Procedures for Providing Notice of Bar Date 

and Other Information to All Creditors and Potential Creditors (Dkt. No. 1784) (the “Motion”), (2) 

Application of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1103 and Fed. R. 

Bankr. P. 2014 and 5002 to Retain and Employ Angeion Group, LLC as Fire Claim Bar Date 

Noticing Agent Effective as of May 22, 2019 (the “Application”) in accordance with the terms and 

conditions set forth in the Statement of Work and Project Proposal (the “Agreement”) attached 

hereto as Exhibit A; and (3) the Motion of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants Pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a), 501, and Fed R. Bankr. P. 3003(c), 5005 and 9007 for Entry of an Order (i) 

Approving a Separate Bar Date for Fire Claims, (ii) Approving the Form for Notice of the Bar Date 

for Fire Claims and Related Procedures, and (iii) Approving Supplemental Procedures for 

Providing Notice of Important Deadlines to Fire Claimants (the “Bar Date Motion”). The TCC’s 

Objection, Application, and Bar Date Motion are being filed concurrently herewith. 

BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS 

3. I have been responsible, in whole or in part, for the design and implementation of 

hundreds of court-approved notice and administration programs including some of the largest and 

most complex notice plans in recent history. I have taught numerous accredited Continuing Legal 

Education courses on the Ethics of Legal Notification in Class Action Settlements, using Digital 

Media in Due Process Notice Programs, as well as Claims Administration, generally. I am the 

author of multiple articles on Class Action Notice, Claims Administration, and Notice Design in 

publications such as Bloomberg, BNA Class Action Litigation Report, Law360, the American Bar 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 3

of 62
- 3 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Association’s Class Action and Derivative Section Newsletter and I am a frequent speaker on notice 

issues at conferences throughout the United States and internationally. 

4. I was certified as a professional in digital media sales by the Interactive Advertising 

Bureau (“IAB”) and I am co-author of the Digital Media section of Duke Law’s Guidelines and 

Best Practices—Implementing 2018 Amendments to Rule 23. 

5. I have given public comment and written testimony to the Judicial Conference 

Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure on the role of direct mail, email, broadcast media, 

digital media and print publication, in effecting Due Process notice, and I have met with 

representatives of the Federal Judicial Center to discuss the 2018 amendments to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 23 and suggest an educational curriculum for the judiciary concerning notice 

procedures. A copy of relevant judicial recognition of Angeion Group’s notice programs is 

attached hereto as Exhibit B. 

6. Prior to joining Angeion’s executive team, I was employed as the Director of Class 

Action services at Kurtzman Carson Consultants, an experienced notice and settlement 

administrator. Prior to my notice and claims administration experience, I was employed in private 

law practice. 

7. My notice work comprises a wide range of settlements that include product defect, 

mass disasters, false advertising, employment, antitrust, tobacco, banking, firearm, insurance, and 

bankruptcy cases. I have been at the forefront of infusing digital media, as well as big data and 

advanced targeting, into class action notice programs. For example, the Honorable Sarah Vance 

stated in her December 31, 2014 Order in In Re: Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust 

Litigation, MDL No. 2328: 

To make up for the lack of individual notice to the remainder of the 

class, the parties propose a print and web-based plan for publicizing 

notice. The Court welcomes the inclusion of web-based forms of

communication in the plan.... The Court finds that the proposed 

method of notice satisfies the requirements of Rule 23(c)(2)(B) and 

due process. 

The direct emailing of notice to those potential class members for 

whom Hayward and Zodiac have a valid email address, along with 

publication of notice in print and on the web, is reasonably calculated 

to apprise class members of the settlement. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 4

of 62
- 4 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

8. As detailed below, courts have repeatedly recognized my work in the design of class 

action notice programs: 

a. On February 24, 2017, The Honorable Ronald B. Rubin in James Roy et al. 

v. Titeflex Corporation et al., No. 384003V (Md. Cir. Ct.), noted when granting preliminary 

approval to the settlement: 

What is impressive to me about this settlement is in addition to all 

the usual recitation of road racing litanies is that there is going to be 

a) public notice of a real nature and b) about a matter concerning not 

just money but public safety and then folks will have the knowledge 

to decide for themselves whether to take steps to protect themselves 

or not. And that’s probably the best thing a government can do is to 

arm their citizens with knowledge and then the citizens can make a 

decision. To me that is a key piece of this deal. I think the notice 

provisions are exquisite. (Emphasis added). 

b. Likewise, on July 21, 2017, The Honorable John A. Ross in In Re Ashley 

Madison Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 2669 (E.D. Mo.), stated in 

the Court’s Order granting preliminary approval of the settlement: 

The Court further finds that the method of disseminating Notice, as 

set forth in the Motion, the Declaration of Steven Weisbrot, Esq. on 

Adequacy of Notice Program, dated July 13, 2017, and the Parties’ 

Stipulation—including an extensive and targeted publication 

campaign composed of both consumer magazine publications in 

People and Sports Illustrated, as well as serving 11,484,000 highly 

targeted digital banner ads to reach the prospective class members 

that will deliver approximately 75.3% reach with an average 

frequency of 3.04 — is the best method of notice practicable under 

the circumstances and satisfies all requirements provided in Rule 

23(c)(2)(B) and all Constitutional requirements including those of 

due process. (Emphasis added). 

The Court further finds that the Notice fully satisfies Rule 23 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the requirements of due 

process; provided, that the Parties, by agreement, may revise the 

Notice, the Claim Form, and other exhibits to the Stipulation, in 

ways that are not material or ways that are appropriate to update 

those documents for purposes of accuracy. 

c. In the In Re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep EcoDiesel Marketing, Sales Practices, 

and Products Liability Litigation, Case No. 17-md-02777-EMC (N.D. Cal.), in the Court’s 

February 11, 2019 Order, the Honorable Edward M. Chen ruled: 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 5

of 62
- 5 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[In addition] the Court finds that the language of the class notices 

(short and long-form) is appropriate and that the means of notice – 

which includes mail notice, electronic notice, publication notice, and 

social media “marketing” – is the “best notice . . . practicable under 

the circumstances.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B); see also Proc. 

Guidance for Class Action Sett. ¶¶ 3-5, 9 (addressing class notice, 

opt-outs, and objections). The Court notes that the means of notice 

has changed somewhat, as explained in the Supplemental Weisbrot

Declaration filed on February 8, 2019, so that notice will be more 

targeted and effective. See generally Docket No. 525 (Supp. 

Weisbrot Decl.) (addressing, inter alia, press release to be distributed 

via national newswire service, digital and social media marketing 

designed to enhance notice, and “reminder” first-class mail notice 

when AEM becomes available). 

d. On June 26, 2018, in his Order granting preliminary approval of the 

settlement in Mayhew v. KAS Direct, LLC, et al., Case No. 16-cv-6981 (VB) (S.D.N.Y.), 

The Honorable Vincent J. Briccetti ruled: 

In connection with their motion, plaintiffs provide the declaration of 

Steven Weisbrot, Esq., a principal at the firm Angeion Group, LLC, 

which will serve as the notice and settlement administrator in this 

case. (Doc. #101, Ex. F: Weisbrot Decl.) According to Mr. 

Weisbrot, he has been responsible for the design and 

implementation of hundreds of class action administration plans, has 

taught courses on class action claims administration, and has given 

testimony to the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of 

Practice and Procedure on the role of direct mail, email, and digital 

media in due process notice. Mr. Weisbrot states that the internet 

banner advertisement campaign will be responsive to search terms 

relevant to “baby wipes, baby products, baby care products, 

detergents, sanitizers, baby lotion, [and] diapers,” and will target 

users who are currently browsing or recently browsed categories

“such as parenting, toddlers, baby care, [and] organic products.” 

(Weisbrot Decl. ¶ 18). According to Mr. Weisbrot, the internet 

banner advertising campaign will reach seventy percent of the 

proposed class members at least three times each. (Id. ¶ 9). 

Accordingly, the Court approves of the manner of notice proposed 

by the parties as it is reasonable and the best practicable option for 

confirming the class members receive notice. 

9. By way of background, Angeion is an experienced class action notice and claims 

administration company formed by a team of executives that have had extensive tenures at five 

other nationally recognized claims administration companies. Collectively, the management team 

at Angeion has overseen more than 2,000 class action settlements and distributed over $10 billion 

to class members. The executive profiles as well as the company overview are available at 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 6

of 62
- 6 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

http://www.angeiongroup.com/meet_the_team.htm. 

DISINTERESTEDNESS 

10. In connection with its proposed retention by the TCC in the Debtors’ Cases, Angeion 

obtained from the TCC and/or its representatives the names of individuals and entities that may be 

parties in interest in the Cases (the “Potential Parties in Interest”). Angeion then circulated the 

names to all Angeion Group Partners requesting disclosure of relationships with any party included 

in the Potential Parties in Interest. Additionally, Angeion requested disclosure by all Angeion 

Group Partners to the best of their knowledge, of any claims held against, or equity interest in, any 

of the Debtors. 

11. Additionally, Angeion searched its client database (“Firm Database”) for Potential 

Parties in Interest in the following categories: (a) Debtors; (b) Debtors’ Affiliates and Subsidiaries; 

(c) Banks at which the Debtors hold accounts; (d) Debtors’ current Officers and Directors; and (e) 

Debtors’ Term and Revolving Loan Lenders and Administrative Agents. Because of the length of 

the Debtors’ Potential Parties in Interest List, a search of every name thereon would have produced 

little meaningful information for Angeion, the Court, and parties in interest to evaluate Angeion’s 

relationships with Potential Parties in Interest. 

12. To the extent the search of the Firm Database and the inquiries to the Angeion Group 

Partners indicated that Angeion presently has, or had within the last five years, a relationship with 

a Potential Party in Interest, the identities of such Parties and Angeion’s relationships therewith are 

set forth on Schedule 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein. 

13. To the best of my knowledge and belief, Angeion’s relationship with each entity 

listed on Schedule 1 (or their apparent affiliates or entities that Angeion believes to be affiliates, as 

the case may be) was or is only on matters that are unrelated to the Debtors and these Cases. 

14. In several instances, the names on the Debtors’ list of Potential Parties in Interest 

were very common and/or generic. As such, it was not possible to identify with certainty whether 

Angeion has any client relationship to disclose for those specific names. 

15. Given the breadth of Angeion’s client base, however, it is possible that Angeion 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 7

of 62
- 7 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

may now or in the future be retained by one or more of the Potential Parties in Interest in unrelated 

matters without my knowledge. To the extent the Debtors discover and disclose additional Potential 

Parties in Interest during the course of these Cases, Angeion will use reasonable efforts to identify 

whether a material relationship exists with any such parties. To the extent that Angeion discovers 

or enters into any new, material relationship with Potential Parties in Interest, it will supplement 

this Declaration. 

16. In addition Angeion may also have been engaged by affiliates, equity holders or 

sponsors of Potential Parties in Interest and Angeion may have worked with, continue to work with, 

have or had mutual clients with, been represented by and/or advised certain accounting and law 

firms that are Potential Parties in Interest (and, in the case of law firms, may have entered into 

engagement agreements in which the law firm was named as client although the work was 

performed for a mutual client of Angeion’s and the applicable law firm.) 

17. Although Angeion has researched the Potential Parties in Interest list, the Debtors 

may have customers, creditors, competitors, and other parties with whom they maintain business 

relationships that are not included as Potential Parties in Interest and with whom Angeion may 

maintain business relationships. It is possible that certain of Angeion’s and its respective Partners 

and employees may have had in the past, may currently have, or may in the future have connections 

to (a) the Debtors, (b) Potential Parties in Interest, or (c) funds or other investment vehicles that 

may own debt or securities of the Debtors or Potential Parties in Interest. 

18. Other than as disclosed herein, Angeion has no relationship with the Debtors of 

which I am aware after due inquiry. Based on the foregoing, I believe Angeion is disinterested as 

defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not hold or represent an interest 

materially adverse to the Debtors or their estates. 

19. The compensation structure set forth in the Application and Agreement were 

negotiated at arms’ length and are consistent with Angeion’s typical compensation for work of this 

nature. 

20. This declaration outlines why Debtors’ proposed Supplemental Notice Plan 

(“Debtors’ Supplemental Notice Plan” or “DSNP”), which the Debtors proffer ostensibly to 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 8

of 62
- 8 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

attempt to provide supplemental notice of the Bar Date to unknown creditors, including Unknown 

Fire Claimants, is inadequate. This declaration will also describe the notice strategy that Angeion 

Group and the TCC propose to use in this Litigation, (the “TCC Notice Program” or the “Notice 

Program”) including the considerations that informed the development of the Notice Program and 

why it will be effective.

CRITICAL DEFICIENCIES IN THE DEBTORS’ DIRECT NOTICE PLAN 

21. From my review of the Motion and the Declaration of Benjamin P. D. Schrag, 

Debtors are only proposing to provide direct notice to prepetition lenders, bondholders, other 

financial creditors, trade creditors, parties to pending or threatened litigation (other than Wildfire 

Claimants and Wildfire Subrogation Claimants), current and former employees, contract and lease 

counterparties, and other traditional creditors and parties in interest in these Chapter 11 Cases. 

22. Under its notice procedures, PG&E proposes to provide written notice to parties it 

considers “Known Wildfire Claimants”—those claimants who filed pre-petition complaints and 

have already filed proofs of claim. Debtors represent they will make efforts to send notice to 2017 

North Bay Fire claimants identified by a GIS database, but do not indicate they will use the same 

GIS database to identify (or notice) 2018 Camp Fire claimants. PG&E is not proposing to take 

actions to obtain updated contact information for Fire Claimants displaced by the fires beyond the 

forwarding information available from the U.S. Postal Service. 

23. With respect to updated address information from the BrownGreer database and 

insurance files, PG&E indicates (without a timeline) that it will request this information. To the 

extent such information is provided to PG&E “reasonably in advance of the entry of the Proposed 

Order,” PG&E will send notice by first class mail to any claimants identified therein. PG&E 

indicates it will undertake no additional investigation or search beyond those discussed above. 

24. Based on my extensive professional experience, Debtors’ unwillingness to 

undertake a diligent search for the current contact information of known creditors is highly unusual. 

As discussed below, the TCC’s proposed notice procedures remedies this critical deficiency in the 

Debtors’ procedures by providing for a diligent investigation into the identity and current contact 

information for known or reasonably ascertainable Fire Claimants. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 9

of 62
- 9 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CRITICAL DEFICIENCIES IN THE DEBTORS’ SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE PLAN 

25. The media plan promulgated by the Debtor is not reasonably calculated to provide 

due process of law. It does not rely on established media best practices, it does not make use of 

contemporary media channels, nor does it provide transparency of process, including using verified 

third-party research to validate their suggested media placements. As discussed below, the TCC’s 

proposed media plan provides a robust, targeted, integrated plan composed of the most advanced 

and targeted technology currently available, as well as time-tested techniques to truly reach and 

inform fire claimants of the Bar Date Notice. 

26. Design, implementation, and evaluation of a notice plan are guided by due process 

considerations under the United States Constitution, by federal and local rules, and by case law 

pertaining to due process notice. 

27. It is long established by Supreme Court precedent that the twin goals of a due 

process notice plan are that the plan must desire to actually inform the absentee population and that 

the plan must use means reasonably calculated to do so. 

“But when notice is a person’s due, process which is a mere gesture is not 

due process. The means employed must be such as one desirous of actually 

informing the absentee might reasonably adopt to accomplish it,” Mullane 

v. Central Hanover Trust, 339 U.S. 306, 315 (1950). 

“[N]otice must be reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to 

apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an 

opportunity to present their objections,” Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 

U.S. 156 (1974) citing Mullane at 314. 

28. The level of process due to a party prior to the deprivation of a property interest 

(such as a bankruptcy discharge) is highly dependent on the context. As the Supreme Court has 

repeatedly emphasized, “‘[t]he very nature of due process negates any concept of inflexible 

procedures universally applicable to every imaginable situation.’” Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, 

Inc., 532 U.S. 189, 196 (2001) (quoting Cafeteria & Rest. Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy, 

367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961)). Thus, “process that may be constitutionally sufficient in one setting 

may be insufficient in another.” In re Mansaray-Ruffin, 530 F.3d 230, 239 (3rd Cir. 2008). 

29. On November 1, 2018, the Northern District of California issued Procedural 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 10

of 62
- 10 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Guidance for Class Action Settlements. The guidance counseled that practitioners should consider, 

among other methodologies, the following ways to increase notice to class members: identification 

of potential class members through third-party data sources; use of social media to provide notice 

to class members and hiring a marketing specialist. Moreover, the guidance counseled that the 

notice distribution plan should rely on U.S. mail, email, and/or social media as appropriate, to 

achieve the best notice that is practicable under the circumstances, consistent with Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 23(c)(2). 

30. After reviewing the Debtors’ Supplemental Notice Plan (the “DSNP”), it is my 

opinion that the DSNP does not provide due process of law, nor has it been demonstrated that it 

was reasonably calculated to do so. Additionally, if this were a class action, the DSNP would not 

conform to the Northern District of California’s 2018 Procedural Guidance for Class Action 

Settlements. 

31. It is established “black letter law” among media planners that the starting point of 

any media plan must include a defined and verified Target Audience. A Target Audience, simply 

explicated, is the audience that the media planner is attempting to reach. Objective syndicated data 

sources, such as those outlined below, are used to understand the size and compositional makeup 

of the Target Audience. 

32. Chief among the reasons that a Target Audience is a necessary element of a media 

plan is so that media planners can calculate the net reach and average exposure frequency among 

the audience. According to the Bolch Judicial Institute, Duke Law School’s Class Action 

Settlement Guidelines and Best Practices, a notice program should be transparent, establishing an 

affected population base and citing all support and research tools used. All calculations for reach 

assumptions should be disclosed. The notices should reach a significant percentage of class 

members, and the notice program should be scaled appropriately to the circumstances. While the 

DSNP is not a class action notice plan, per se, its goal (informing an absentee population), methods 

(advertising), and importance (preserving legal rights) are virtually identical.1

 By all accounts, the 

 

1

 Bankruptcy Courts have considered the holding of Mullane, including finding actual prejudice to the claimants when 

the debtor “knew or reasonably should have known about the claims.” See, e.g., Elliott v. General Motors LLC (In re 

Motors Liquidation Co.), 829 F.3d 135, 159 (2d Cir. 2016) (emphasis added). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 11

of 62
- 11 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DSNP, does not meet any of the best practices identified in the Duke Best Practice Guide, does not 

provide adequate due process, and would not independently be approved in the class action context. 

33. Reach and frequency are generally considered the great equalizers in comparing 

competing notice plans2 because, when they are based on objective syndicated data tools such as 

those listed below, they allow courts an ability to compare notice plans on an apples-to-apples basis. 

However, these numbers, while objective and unequivocally important, only tell a portion of the 

story, as media planning is both science and art. 

34. For instance, reach percentage does not measure the level of media sophistication, 

the nuances of advanced media strategy, or the creativity and care that a media planner puts into a 

plan. However, the DSNP fails on those metrics as well. 

35. If a notice provider is reporting an audience reach and frequency, then third-party 

research consistent with advertising industry best practice must be used to accurately report that 

reach, and all assumptions must be transparent. In the DSNP, there is no defined validated target 

audience.3 Therefore, it is uncertain as to what objective research, if any, was utilized to determine 

the best media mix to reach potential claimants, and whether the audiences were objectively 

verified by any media research tools. 

36. Details supporting media selection and implementation are likewise vague or 

missing. It seems the guiding principle of the DSNP is a “little bit of this and a little bit of that.” 

There is no lead medium. There is no anchor from which to drive responses to the action. There 

is no mention of dayparts. Contrast that with the TCC Notice Program, which will have a consistent 

broadcast presence, result in millions of impressions and yield both notably high reach and durable 

average frequency. Moreover, the DSNP does not make use of earned media strategy, out of home 

advertising or word of mouth marketing. 

 

2

 The effectiveness of the means of communication is measured by reach and frequency. Reach is the number or 

percent of people exposed at least once to an advertising schedule over a specific period of time. Net reach excludes 

audience duplication across media groups. 

3

 The estimated scope of the intended notice program should be defined as a validated reach statistic. Media research 

companies offer services to properly quantify the reach to targeted consumers. These research services provide detailed 

insight on consumer behaviors and media consumption habits of various populations. These services can calculate net 

audience reached and should disclose the percent of the class using various media, including television (network, cable, 

or digital), radio (terrestrial or online), online and social or mobile media. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 12

of 62
- 12 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

37. As discussed below, the TCC Notice Program uses the most state-of-the-art digital 

and social media currently available. This was a deliberate decision, because we are advised that 

many Fire Claimants are displaced from their home and rely on their digital devices to consume 

news and otherwise communicate with the outside world. 

38. When utilizing electronic notice, a “class-notice expert or professional claims 

administrator should provide evidence demonstrating that the proposed means of electronic notice 

will: (1) provide the ‘best practicable’ notice; (2) effectively reach a significant percentage of the 

class; and (3) provide the class members an adequate opportunity to exercise their rights and that 

those opportunities are not diminished by the structure of the plan.”4 (Judicial Institute, Duke Law 

School’s Class Action Settlement Guidelines and Best Practices). The DSNP does not identify why 

and whether their proposed plan would reach a significant percentage of the Fire Claimants. In fact, 

as previously noted, it does not identify a Target Audience at all. Moreover, there is no information 

that would allow this court to assess the declarant’s media experience, credentials, or training (if 

any) as it relates to traditional or digital media. Omitting basic media metrics such as a validated 

target audience and professional advertising experience, is not merely a matter of lack of adherence 

to form, it signifies a flawed and erroneous approach to providing notice. 

39. Additionally, it is not just the lack of objective data that renders the DSNP virtually 

impotent in the face of properly notifying Fire Claimants. The entire plan is antiquated and seems 

to be the very embodiment of the “mere gesture” that the Supreme Court cautioned to avoid when 

evaluating process in the context of reaching absentee audiences. 

40. The DSNP pays virtually no regard to modern media consumption realities and more 

importantly, disregards any attempt to reach the Fire Claimants, specifically. 

41. For example, the mix of media seemingly ignores over-the-top (“OTT”) and 

streaming media, two mainstays in the modern media environment. Those methods of 

 

4

 In assessing the qualifications of a class-notice expert or professional claims administrator, the parties and court may 

consider the expert’s or administrator’s: (1) experience or education with the specific types of media under 

consideration; (2) professional experience with respect to advertising; (3) membership in an advertising-standards 

committee; (4) any professional certifications; (5) any credentials or additional training with respect to advertising 

using both traditional forms and digital; (6) requisite skills to provide an opinion on digital advertising; (7) specific 

knowledge of current advertising industry, emerging trends, and technology; and (8) any prior experience testifying 

about class action notice. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 13

of 62
- 13 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

communication are particularly relevant where, as here, a population has been displaced and may 

be forced to rely solely on their mobile device to receive news. Moreover, the DSNP does not 

utilize any Out of Home5 media to help diffuse news of the Bar Date. 

42. Out of Home advertising recognizes that the Fire Claimants may be displaced, 

mobile, and in vehicles for significant amounts of time, especially on main thoroughfares at or near 

the affected communities. To address this reality, the TCC Notice Program contemplates the use 

of digital and static billboard units in the key geographical regions and transit shelters.6

43. Also, there is no attempted use of Earned Media, or Public Relations in the DSNP. 

The California fires were unmistakably one of the most well reported stories in local, regional and 

national news outlets over the previous year.7

 For example, as recently as May 15, 2019, the 

wildfires made “breaking” headline news as Cal Fire announced that its investigation determined 

PG&E equipment caused the Camp Fire.8 Despite this fact, the DSNP makes no serious attempt to 

capitalize on the media interest. 

44. Contrast that with the TCC Notice Program’s use of two reputable PR companies—

one based in the Bay Area, and one with expertise in crisis management—to engage in direct 

outreach to reporters, arrange press conferences, and otherwise run a sophisticated public relations 

campaign, and the difference is glaring. 

45. The DSNP makes no attempt to craft a publication plan that has temporal proximity 

to key dates. In fact, their plan is entirely silent as to when, and for how long, their ads would run. 

It is likewise virtually silent as to the number of units, the time of units, the reach percentage among 

varying audiences, and what, if anything, informed their decisions to choose certain media over 

other forms of media. As discussed in more detail below, the TCC Notice Program, on the other 

hand, is expertly designed to follow established media wisdom regarding primacy, sustainability 

 

5

 Out of Home is the media term of art which encompasses billboards and other prominent structural advertisements. 

6

 Counsel should consider which method or methods of giving notice will be most effective; simply assuming that the 

‘traditional’ methods are best may disregard contemporary communication realities.” Committee Note to Amended 

Rule 23. 

7

 A simple Google News search for “California Wildfires” garners about 224,000 reported stories. 

8

 See, e.g., Peter Eavis and Ivan Penn, N.Y. TIMES, California Says PG&E Power Lines Caused Camp Fire That 

Killed 85 (May 15, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/15/business/energy-environment/pge-camp-firecalifornia.html. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 14

of 62
- 14 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

and recency. It is tactically plotted to launch heavy, and consistently apply media pressure 

throughout the Bar Date window. In addition, the TCC Notice Program includes a strong heavyup at the end of the campaign, to make sure to apply maximum pressure immediately prior to the 

Bar Date. A copy of the suggested TCC Timeline and delivery units is attached hereto as Exhibit 

C, and the corresponding reach percentage and average frequency measured against two verified 

audiences is discussed below. 

46. For the reasons described herein, it is my opinion that the DSNP does not provide 

due process of law to the Fire Claimants and was not reasonably calculated to do so. To the 

contrary, it is a mere gesture designed to “tick a box,” not to meaningfully reach and inform a 

displaced population of their important legal rights. A comprehensive visual comparison of both 

providers’ supplemental media plan is attached as Exhibit D. 

OVERVIEW OF THE TCC NOTICE PROGRAM

47. The proposed Notice Program is based on objective data customarily used by 

advertising professionals and is designed to reach the greatest practicable number of Fire Claimants. 

Notice will be effectuated directly where possible, and via the use of a sophisticated, integrated, 

multimedia campaign, where no direct contact information exists. 

48. Specifically, the Notice Program utilizes a combination of direct notice via U.S. 

mail and email (where both are available or can be derived from third-party data sources), coupled 

with robust paid and earned media campaigns. The integrated paid media campaign utilizes stateof-the-art targeted internet banner advertisements, custom social media campaigns, a bespoke 

broadcast radio/television campaign, a network of digital and static billboards, a combination of 

local, regional, and national print publications, and a nationwide, yet geographically tailored, public 

relations campaign. Further, the Notice Program utilizes an earned media campaign designed to 

take advantage of the substantial news coverage the events have already garnered and to continue 

to drive media to cover the story at a local, regional and national level. Moreover, we will engage 

in a grassroots word of mouth campaign, including experiential marketing such as hand-to-hand 

document disbursement across all counties affected by the fires. 

49. In designing the Notice Program, Angeion Group has relied on our extensive prior 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 15

of 62
- 15 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

experience in notifying unknown, displaced and/or shell-shocked audiences of their rights and 

obligations in litigation settings. Further, extensive research into the notice issues specific to these 

Cases was undertaken, including receiving information directly from those affected by the fires, 

syndicated data sources relied upon by advertising and marketing professionals, the TCC and mass 

media reports. 

50. Angeion has also received input and feedback from members of the TCC, who have 

unique and important insights into the best way to reach communities affected by the fires. 

51. We are particularly cognizant that the Target Audience here may have been 

displaced and that their displacement may have led them to take shelter at or near the site of one of 

the fires, elsewhere in California, elsewhere on the West Coast, or elsewhere in the United States. 

We have designed the Notice Program to specifically account for the geographic realities of the 

affected population. 

52. Given how little time has passed since the Camp Fire occurred, I understand the 

problem of displaced persons is especially acute with claimants affected by the Camp Fire. 

However, I am also aware that many individuals who suffered injury or loss from other fires, 

including the 2017 North Bay Fires and the 2015 Butte Fire, have also been displaced or have 

relocated. An effective notice plan will need to take this into consideration in order to provide 

effective notice to all Fire Claimants. 

53. It is also important that the notice plan reach those affected by the tragic Ghost Ship 

Fire. The Debtors’ proposed plan makes no reference to the Ghost Ship Fire and does not appear to 

have considered those claims in designing its plan (for example, the Ghost Ship Fire is not included 

on the Debtors' proposed proof of claim form). The plan proposed herein is designed to include 

and reach out to Ghost Ship claimants, many of whom reside in the same geographic areas as 

individuals affected by other fires. Moreover, I understand many Ghost Ship claimants are 

currently represented by counsel and are already aware of the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. 

We anticipate our notice plan will also succeed in identifying and contacting many Ghost Ship 

claimants through their counsel. 

54. Given the unique circumstance surrounding this notification effort, we have 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 16

of 62
- 16 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

carefully designed our plan to account for the realities of our target audiences’ potential location(s) 

during the pendency of the notification efforts and we therefore suggest purchasing media in a 

geographically targeted, flighted format, to help achieve the most successful notice program 

possible. We also suggest using both “high tech” and “high touch” methods to account for the 

demographic diversity of our Target Audience.9

55. We have divided the integrated Notice Program into four distinct yet associated 

categories: local, state, West Coast, and national. The “local” category covers the four Designated 

Media Markets10 (“DMAs”) closest to the fires. The “state” category encompasses the entire state 

of California. The “West Coast” category covers the whole of the West Coast (see detailed map, 

infra) of the United States, and the “national” category, as the name suggests, covers the entire 

United States. This provides the broadest, most inclusive national geographic coverage, as well as 

targeted local coverage of the Northern California area, ensuring that Fire Claimants are not 

excluded based on where they are currently located. 

56. The Notice Program accounts for the contemporary media landscape as well as the 

nuances necessary to reach a population that is largely unrepresented, often displaced, and in some 

cases, homeless. Specifically, as detailed below, a large majority of claimants will be reached by 

objectively measurable video, audio, digital, print, and out of home media (at least 95% of adults 

in the Northern California area and an estimated 80% of adults across the entire state of California.) 

We will provide frequent opportunities for the Fire Claimants to see the message through the 

overlapping reach of the different notice methods, including “noticeable” Publication Notices in 

leading consumer magazines and daily newspapers that will allow readers to have a written record 

and the ability to refer back to the Notice, pass it on to others, and easily respond via the Prime 

Clerk website or toll-free number. Fire Claimants will also be exposed to high-quality Video 

Notices that will allow them to be alerted to key information and to call or visit the website for 

 

9

 In determining which means of communication is the most effective to send class notice, the parties and court should 

analyze each potential means of communication on a case-by-case (and sometimes intra-case) basis. Bolch Judicial 

Institute, Duke Law School, GUIDELINES AND BEST PRACTICES IMPLEMENTING 2018 AMENDMENTS TO 

RULE 23 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT PROVISIONS, at 49. 

10 DMA or “Designated Marketing Area” is a term used by Nielsen Media Research to identify an exclusive geographic 

area of counties or parishes in which the home market television stations hold a dominance of total hours viewed. 

There are 210 DMAs in the U.S. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 17

of 62
- 17 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

additional information. Audio Notices appearing on general interest radio stations and on African 

American, Spanish language and Cajun stations in the Northern California area will further alert 

claimants to the Bar Date. Reach will be extended via rotating Banner Notices through 

programmatic display, and social media will keep claimants abreast of important updates, including 

allowing an authoritative, court-authorized voice to maintain contact with the population via trusted 

chat rooms and Twitter accounts. The Notice Program also leverages the substantial press coverage 

that the fires have received by incorporating a prolonged professional earned media campaign that 

will generate significant local, regional and national press coverage of the Bar Date notice. 

57. Lastly, the TCC Notice Program incorporates grassroots, local, high touch, word of 

mouth marketing. Angeion will devote substantial resources to community outreach, including 

cooperating with local agencies, houses of worship and community centers, to make sure that Fire 

Claimants are notified not only via paid and earned media but by their own community, who they 

interact with and trust. 

58. As part of that effort, the TCC has indicated that its members are ready and willing 

to provide assistance in the notice process as appropriate, including visiting affected communities 

and interacting with potential claimants to inform them about the bar dates and their rights in the 

bankruptcy proceeding. 

59. Understanding that direct notice may be preferable to media notice under certain 

circumstances, if/when it can be achieved, considerable efforts have and will continue to be 

undertaken to compile postal and email addresses of all Fire Claimants. As described infra, the 

final mailing list will include assembling data from myriad sources, including mailing to the address 

for the attorney of record set forth in any Complaint filed pre-petition, as well as to any holder of a 

Fire Claim that has filed a Proof of Claim at the address listed in such Proof of Claim. Additionally, 

public records, sophisticated third-party data aggregation sources, and community resources will 

be identified, culled and thoroughly searched, to identify as many current postal addresses for 

property owners who are likely eligible to participate. However, even after these efforts, it is 

estimated that we will only have direct contact information for a small percentage of all eligible 

parties, thus underscoring the enormous need for a robust media plan to advise the Fire Claimants 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 18

of 62
- 18 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

of the Bar Date, which, given the circumstances, is of radically heightened importance to this 

population. 

60. Separate from the compilation of the individual notice mailing lists, we have used 

objective, third-party data sources and media research tools that are commonly employed by 

advertising experts to determine the best mix of media to reach the Fire Claimants. These objective 

tools are routinely employed to understand the socio-economic characteristics, interests, and 

practices of a Target Audience, and to guide media selection and placements. These data sources 

are also routinely used by courts to evaluate media plans. 

61. These time-tested tools do more than aid in the proper selection of media to reach a 

specified audience, as they allow the court to measure the media plan on an objective basis against 

competing plans and ensure that they are doing an apples-to-apples analysis. Here, the leading 

available tools were used to help inform the media mix to be used, as well as to analyze the reach 

and frequency of the media portion of this Notice Program. These tools include: 

 GfK MRI – National syndicated research that measures media usage, demographics, 

psychographics and consumer behavior to provide insight into the actions and 

motivations of adult American consumers. 

 Scarborough – Syndicated research that measures shopping patterns, media 

behaviors, lifestyle and demographic information of American consumers on a local 

level; all 210 Nielsen Television DMAs are included in this research. 

 Snapshots – A compilation of local measures such as demographics, lifestyle, media, 

consumer, retail and general market information. 

 BUDDY (Business Demographics and Data for You) – This tool contains 

demographic and household spending reports and forecasts which can be drilled 

down to the zip code level. 

 comScore – Online audience measurement tool that provides insights into which 

websites deliver to certain demographic audiences on a national or local basis, in 

addition to user engagement with those websites and cross-visitation patterns. The 

Plan Metrix portion of this tool also combines users’ actual online behaviors with 

detailed information about their lifestyles, interests, and buying habits – both online 

and offline. 

 eMarketer – National and International syndicated online survey that reports on core 

media topics, industries, trending news, and other hot topics in the industry. Some 

research included in the extensive library includes demographic, measurement, 

media usage, attribution, content marketing, influencer marketing, AI updates, Big 

Data, and other highlights in the industry. 

Planning/Buying Tools 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 19

of 62
- 19 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Nielsen – Provides audience measurement/ratings data for television and radio. 

Through this tool, we have access to data services for 17 television markets and 64 

radio markets based on current buying needs with the ability to add new markets as 

client demands dictate. 

 SQAD – Reports costing guidelines (Cost Per Point/CPP and Cost Per 

Thousand/CPM) based on actual purchased television and radio transactions for all 

210 Nielsen Television DMAs and over 300 reported Nielsen Audio Radio MSAs. 

 Geopath – Formerly known as the Traffic Audit Bureau, Geopath is a not-for-profit 

organization governed by a board of advertisers, agencies, and media companies. 

Geopath is the leader in the auditing of out of home audiences in the United States. 

 DOmedia – DOmedia is an online portal that our buyers utilize in order to centralize 

the out of home (Billboard) buying process. The platform opens our buyers up to a 

large number of smaller scale vendors to provide additional out of home 

opportunities for our clients. In addition, the tool has very strong mapping and 

demographic functionalities that allow the buyers to overlay additional data points 

for a more impactful out of home campaign. 

62. Virtually all professional advertising agencies and commercial media departments 

use objective syndicated data tools, like the ones described above, to quantify net reach and to aid 

in proper audience deduplication analysis. Sources like these guarantee that advertising placements 

can be measured against an objective basis and confirm that reporting statistics are not overstated. 

They are ubiquitous tools in a media planner’s arsenal and are regularly accepted by courts in 

evaluating the efficacy of a media plan, or its component parts.

 11

63. A detailed description of each component part of the TCC Notice Program is 

outlined below. It is my professional opinion that $20,000,000.00-$25,000,000.00 should be spent 

on supplemental procedures designed to reach unrepresented Fire Claimants, which could be 

funded in large part by restructuring the customer notice procedure, as discussed in Paragraphs 77 

and 78. 

64. As set out in the declaration of Jeffrey R. Dion, filed contemporaneously with my 

Declaration, I believe a bar date of January 31, 2020, would be appropriate to accomplish the notice 

program set out herein. The January 31, 2020 deadline would provide sufficient time to implement 

the TCC notice plan in full. The plan leverages key dates and time periods throughout the proposed 

 

11 Experts can calculate the percentage of a class that will be exposed to a notice by relying on generally accepted 

methodologies developed for advertising in non-litigation settings. A high percentage of class members can often 

reasonably be reached by a notice campaign. But if the identities of a significant percentage of class members are 

unknown, a campaign may require multiple types of notice (e.g., direct notice, publication, digital, or broadcast). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 20

of 62
- 20 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

timeline, including time-dependent tactics such as starting with a heavy media rollout to seed and 

disburse news quickly and broadly, and thereafter increasing ad frequency as the Bar Date 

encroaches. It is further my belief that it is important for the claimants to have a bar date that 

follows the holiday season, as it is my experience that persons often delay handling administrivia 

until after the holiday season. Simple as it sounds, things often get lost or put to the back burner as 

the holidays approach. Moreover, during the holiday season, many displaced persons may be 

travelling back to the northern California market to meet with family and/or friends and are likely 

to be discussing the fires and their damages. Leveraging off this momentum, the media plan works 

hand-in-hand with the TCC’s word of mouth campaign, and in my opinion would provide fire 

claimants the much-needed time to be informed of, discuss, and internalize the seriousness of the 

impending bar date. 

I. DIRECT NOTICE 

65. The TCC Notice Program contemplates a robust Direct Notice plan, which 

incorporates sophisticated third-party data sources, known best practices, and advanced search 

techniques. 

66. Specifically, Angeion will cause all notices to be mailed via the United States Postal 

Service (“USPS”) first-class mail, postage prepaid. Prior to mailing, the mailing list will be 

processed via the USPS National Change of Address (“NCOA”) database to identify updated 

address information for individuals and businesses who have moved in the last four years and who 

filed a change of address card with the USPS. 

A. Fire Claimants and Subrogation Claimants 

67. In order to comport with Due Process, Angeion will compile a Fire Claimant mailing 

list that will be designed to be as fulsome and over-inclusive as possible. Broadly, the categories 

that will ultimately comprise this Fire Claimant list can be summarized as follows. 

a. Prepetition Litigation Records. The list will include all fire victims that filed 

prepetition suits. This includes the data gathered during the North Bay Fires 

litigation, which I am advised, is stored in a centralized database run by BrownGreer 

PLC. Angeion, working with the TCC, will also locate previously filed complaints 

and obtain attorney contact information for the lawyers representing the plaintiffs, 

including the use of litigations service lists. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 21

of 62
- 21 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

b. PG&E Customer Data. Nearly all of the victims were PG&E customers and, thus, 

PG&E maintained current contact information up to and including the date of the 

fires. The physical addresses in this database could, in some cases be outdated, since 

many of the customer addresses would be for homes that were destroyed by the fires. 

Nevertheless, PG&E customers may have updated their records with PG&E, and 

even if they did not, Angeion, working with both the US Postal service and reputable 

third-party data aggregation companies, can determine a significant amount of 

current addresses for some of these individuals. 

c. Geographic Information System’s Data. PG&E has represented in its bar date 

motion that it has some “proprietary data maintained by Geographical Information 

Systems (“GIS”) satellite experts retained by Debtors in connection with the

prepetition litigation” that it would use to make efforts to send notice to owners of 

destroyed properties. Waisman Decl. at 7. I believe that it is critical to use GIS data 

for all fires at issue, including, without limitation, the 2018 Camp Fire. 

d. Disaster Relief and Community Organizations. I am advised that several disaster 

relief organizations, including but not limited to the Red Cross, FEMA and myriad 

local agencies have provided support to fire victims. The TCC believes they will be 

successful in garnering additional contact information through those organizations 

which can be utilized as part of the direct notice efforts. 

e. Records Garnered pursuant to Subpoena. In other court-approved notice programs 

that Angeion has implemented, the court has authorized the use of third-party 

subpoenas to help identify and contact absentee audiences. As it relates to this case, 

the TCC could use subpoenas to procure information from insurance carriers, 

governmental organizations, and/or private repair/remediation companies to gather 

additional US postal address information for fire victims. 

f. First Party Intelligence. Public records, third-party data sources, and community 

resources will be identified, culled and thoroughly searched to identify as many 

owners of destroyed properties. We will then use other sources of data to ascertain 

currently mailing addresses, particularly in circumstances where properties were 

completely destroyed, and notice can no longer be sent to former addresses. 

g. TCC Website. Angeion has been advised that the TCC is designing a dedicated 

website that will act as a hub of communication between the TCC and the fire 

victims. Among other functions, the website will allow those affected by the fires 

to enter their own contact information as well as contact information for displaced 

friends and family members. 

68. As stated above, in order to be certain that we are utilizing the most current mailing 

addresses for fire victims, prior to mailing, all addresses will be processed through the United States 

Postal Service (“USPS”) National Change of Address (“NCOA”) database. This process provides 

updated address information for individuals and businesses who have moved in the last four years 

and who filed a change of address card with the USPS. 

69. Similarly, in an effort to deliver notices to the intended recipients, the Notice 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 22

of 62
- 22 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Program provides for the following: (1) notices that are returned as undeliverable by the USPS and 

have a forwarding address will be re-mailed to that forwarding address; and (2) notices that are 

returned as undeliverable by the USPS without a forwarding address will be subject to address 

verification searches (“skip tracing”), utilizing a wide variety of data sources, including public 

records, real estate records, electronic directory assistance listings, and so on, to locate updated 

addresses. Notices will then be re-mailed to updated addresses located through skip tracing. 

70. The direct mail effort will be supplemented by sending notice to all Fire Claimants 

that have an email address or for whom an email address can be garnered via sophisticated thirdparty data aggregation services described infra. It is important to note that the email effort will be 

in addition to, not in lieu of, the mailed notice efforts described herein. 

71. The exact total number of Fire Claimant Bar Date mailings will be reported to the 

Court in a supplemental declaration after Angeion has sourced, culled and deduplicated among the 

various data sets noted above. 

 B. Email Append and Data Aggregation 

72. Angeion utilizes a network of data partners to aggregate a combination of first- and 

third-party consumer data to append, update and/or verify email addresses. Specifically, we match 

email addresses to certain other data points as a validity check, such as an individual’s name, U.S. 

postal address, and previous email address.12 This service will be useful here, in that we anticipate 

having many Fire Claimants who have been dispersed from their homes, but whom still regularly 

monitor their email and social media. 

73. By way of example, if the debtors’ records had postal address information for a 

particular Fire Claimant, Angeion could run that person’s name and address through our data 

partners’ databases and determine if, for example, the Fire Claimant recently opted to receive email 

billing communications from a car finance company or similar commercial organization. We would 

identify this information irrespective of whether we had an original (different) email on file from 

the debtors’ records for this claimant. This individual’s email address would be updated to reflect 

this change and used as part of an email campaign. Ultimately, with an eye towards creating an 

 

12 Our data partners typically include, Acxiom, Dun & Bradstreet, Google, Nielsen, Oracle and Facebook. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 23

of 62
- 23 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

over-inclusive notice campaign, Angeion will attempt to email notice to both the original email 

addresses, if one was contained in the debtors’ records, as well as any new email addresses garnered 

via this data append process. The mere existence of a conflicting email address entered, for 

example, on a sweepstakes site, or a non-repeat e-commerce site, however, would not be enough 

to trigger an email update because those examples (unlike the auto finance company example just 

discussed) lack an imprimatur of authenticity. This accounts for the practical reality that Fire 

Claimants may enter one email address for a single transactional relationship, like entering an 

online contest, but are more likely to use a valid email address, which they check often, to receive 

commercial billing information. 

74. Below I have outlined some of Angeion’s practices to increase deliverability and 

readability of email notice. Specifically, Angeion will employ the following best practices 

regarding the email notice. 

75. As an initial matter, Angeion designs the email notice to avoid common “red flags” 

that might otherwise cause the recipient’s spam filter to block the email notice or identify it as 

spam. For example, Angeion will not include the Proof of Claim form as an attachment to the email 

notice because attachments are often interpreted by various Internet Service Providers as spam. 

Rather, in accordance with industry best practices, Angeion will include electronic links to all 

operative documents so that recipients can easily access this information on the Prime Clerk 

website. 

76. Angeion also accounts for the reality that some emails will inevitably be blocked as 

a soft bounce during the initial delivery attempt. Therefore, after the initial noticing campaign is 

complete, Angeion, after an approximate 12-24-hour rest period, which allows any temporary block 

at the ISP level to expire, will direct a second round of email notice to any email addresses that 

were previously blocked as soft bounces. In Angeion’s experience, this minimizes the number of 

emails that may have erroneously been blocked by sensitive servers. 

D. Standard Bar Date Notice and Customer Bar Date Notice 

77. Prime Clerk estimates the cost of this mailing to be $17 million — $20 million. This 

is excessively and unnecessarily costly. Angeion Group estimates that it can effectuate the same 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 24

of 62
- 24 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

mailing for approximately $8 million — $9 million. 

78. PG&E has 16 million customers. See Declaration of Benjamin P.D. Schrag. Nearly 

2 million of those customers have signed up for paperless billing.13 These customers could and 

should be noticed in the same email sending their monthly statements. For the approximately 14 

million customers receiving monthly statements by mail, the Customer Bar Date Notice could be 

accomplished by Angeion for approximately $8 million — $9 million. By doing this, Debtors 

could substantially reduce the mailing costs, by approximately $9 million to $11 million, which 

savings could be used to fund the necessary paid and earned media campaigns, without 

meaningfully increasing (and perhaps even decreasing) the overall cost of the Debtors’ notification 

efforts. This would allow a substantially stronger and more effective notice program at a 

comparable price point. 

II. PAID MEDIA 

79. To supplement the comprehensive direct notice efforts and effectuate notice to the 

Fire Claimants, the Notice Program contemplates and includes a robust paid media campaign as 

described herein. 

A. Target Audience 

80. Data from GfK MRI was used to profile the population. The majority of the 

population will be located within a limited geographic area within Northern California and thus, 

the primary thrust of the Notice Plan will be focused there to reach adults 18+ in the four Northern 

California DMAs (San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, ChicoReading, and Eureka). Those geographic regions were specifically analyzed to identify key 

demographic groups which can be used to guide the local media selection since that was the primary 

location of the fires. 

81. Additionally, because the affected population encompasses people who may have 

been displaced due to the fires and therefore could potentially reside anywhere in the United States, 

the Notice Program will include multiple geographic targeting strategies designed to reach potential 

 

13 See https://www.pge.com/en_US/about-pge/environment/what-we-are-doing/paperless-billing/paperlessbilling.page. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 25

of 62
- 25 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Claimants across varying geographies, which as noted previously, are divided into, local, state, 

West Coast and national campaigns. Below is an overview of the different media types that will 

be employed in different regions. 

Local 

Media Type Gross Impressions Reach 

Average 

Frequency

TV 77,713 74.92% 10.62 

Radio 200,698 66.42% 30.95 

Print 7,961 36.06% 2.26 

Newspaper 15,028 21.99% 7.00 

OOH 198,523,113 55.10% 17.00 

Display 60,000,000 40.97% 15.00 

Resident List 20,000,000 13.66% 15.00 

Social 33,000,000 22.50% 1.50 

OTT 6,600,000 5.80% 10.00 

TOTAL 318,424,513 95.00% 51.95 

 Northern CA DMAs 

 California 

 West Region – California, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington 

 National 

82. Using all adults 18+ in the four DMAs as a Target Audience definition, the potential 

audience size is estimated at 9,763,000. This audience is over-inclusive in that it includes all adults 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 26

of 62
- 26 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

in the area and not just those who were affected by the fires. This Target Audience, based on 

objective syndicated data, allows Angeion to report the reach and frequency to the court, with the 

confidence that the reach within the target audience and the number of exposure opportunities 

complies with due process. It also allows us to quantify the reach percentage and number of 

exposure opportunities within the Target Audience. 

83. Here, 95% of the Target Audience would be reached approximately 51.95 times 

each. This reach and frequency will bolster meaningful claimant participation and would satisfy 

and exceed the reasonableness standard. This is the type of media campaign that a brand advertiser 

would actually undertake if they wanted to reach their customers and motivate them to act. This is 

exactly what is needed here given the harsh, and in many cases, dire, circumstances that Fire 

Claimants could incur should they fail to act by the Bar Date and risk having their claims 

discharged. 

84. Since we know that many of the Fire Claimants have been displaced and now reside 

outside of the four key DMAs, we are also providing objective verified audience data, as to reach 

and frequency, measured against a second, broader, Target Audience—Adults 18+ in California. 

85. Using all adults 18+ in California as the Target Audience definition, the potential 

audience size is estimated at 29,922,000. Again, this audience is intentionally over-inclusive and 

is designed to diffuse news of the Bar Date to the affected population, including where they live, 

work and travel. Measured against the broader Target Definition of all adults 18+ in California, 

we maintain an 80.36% reach and an average frequency of almost 28 times each. 

California 

Media Type Impressions Reach 

Average 

Frequency

Local 

Impressions 382,442,000 31.00% 41.23 

Print 26,723 36.75% 2.43 

OOH 261,092,082 50.20% 14.82 

Video 6,250,000 1.40% 15.00 

Streaming 

Audio 6,700,000 2.24% 10.00 

Social 28,000,000 6.24% 15.00 

TOTAL 684,510,805 80.36% 27.98 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 27

of 62
- 27 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

III. MEDIA SELECTION AND MESSAGING 

86. The TCC’s comprehensive regional and national multi-media effort has been 

customized to effectively deliver a clear message to the Fire Claimants. The campaign includes a 

broad mix of media tactics based on the current media landscape, which is highly fragmented. 

87. Media tactics include Video (TV, OTT, Streaming and Programmatic Pre-Roll), 

Audio (Radio and Streaming), Digital (Display, Social, and Search), Magazines, Newspapers, 

Billboards, Transit Shelters, and Experiential tactics. 

88. The custom campaign is designed to reach all segments within the broad Target 

Audience. In key areas, Spanish Language creative will be utilized to extend the reach of the Notice 

Program to the Hispanic audience. The plan is far reaching, tailored, and will be effective in 

seeding and disbursing news to the Fire Claimants both locally and nationally. 

A. VIDEO 

89. Both traditional broadcast television and OTT/Streaming opportunities are highreach media tactics that provide exposure to affected people regardless of where they reside 

(i.e., rural areas, urban areas, etc.). Thirty-second units will appear on local broadcast and cable 

television as appropriate in the 4 core DMAs. 

90. On its own, the Video Notice is estimated to reach over 74% of adults aged 18+ in 

the Northern California DMAs with an estimated average frequency of 10.6 times each. 

91. In practice, what this means is that approximately three quarters of the residents of 

the four DMAs will see a video ad, on average ten times each. 

i. Dayparts

92. A variety of dayparts (morning, daytime, syndicated day/prime access/early fringe, 

early news, and prime/syndicated prime) will be used to increase reach among persons with 

different viewing habits. Daypart mixes and programming selections may change at the time the 

buy is authorized, based on negotiations and availabilities. 

Morning 

• Morning news programming provides an ideal environment for notification 

messages. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 28

of 62
- 28 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

• Loyal audience builds frequency among those reached. 

• Programming considered includes Good Morning America, The Today Show, CBS 

Early Show and Local News. 

Daytime 

• Extends reach among homemakers, retirees, night shift workers, and/or unemployed 

Claimants. 

• Loyal audience builds frequency among those reached. 

• Programming considered includes daytime dramas, game shows and/or talk shows. 

Early and Late News 

• Non-opinionated journalism provides an ideal environment for notification 

programs. 

• Provides broad reach among Claimants. 

• Programming considered includes CBS Evening News, ABC World News Tonight, 

NBC Nightly News and Local News. 

Late Fringe 

 Late Fringe provides additional reach for the Video Notice program. 

 Loyal audience builds frequency among those reached. 

 Programming considered includes The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon, Late 

Night with Seth Myers, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, The Late Late Show 

with James Corden, and Jimmy Kimmel Live. 

ii. TV Rating Points (TRPs) 

93. Approximately 5,885 thirty-second spots will substantially run over a nine-week 

period in Northern California markets. 

94. Ads will air on the top local stations per market and on the top cable networks per 

market. Sample cable networks include CNN, Fox, Discovery (Deadliest Catch), USA, History and 

The Weather Channel. Daypart allocation may change at the time the buy is authorized, based on 

negotiations and availabilities. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 29

of 62
- 29 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

iii. OTT, VOD, and Streaming 

95. Based on the current media landscape and the shift in viewing habits of consumers, 

OTT (Over the Top), VOD (Video On Demand), and Streaming opportunities are recommended to 

reach the chord cutting audience who rely on streaming services such as YouTube, Hulu and 

Amazon as their primary media provider. Including OTT, VOD, and Streaming, which will allow 

the notice to be seen by consumers who are not watching live TV and who may not even own a 

TV. Ads will be placed in non-skippable content to ensure the video is watched in full by the 

potential claimant. 

B. AUDIO 

96. Both terrestrial and streaming radio are high-frequency mediums, ideally suited for 

providing exposure to affected Fire Claimants where they reside (i.e. rural areas, urban areas, etc.). 

97. The Notice Program contemplates 60-second units over a twenty-one-week schedule on 

selected radio stations in the Northern California markets. There are a total of six radio MSAs in the 

Northern California area: Chico, Redding, San Francisco, Sacramento, Stockton, and Modesto. There 

are an additional three counties that are not measured in radio metros and will be included in the 

consideration set. Those counties are Lake, Mendocino, and Humboldt. 

98. We conservatively estimate that 8,712 total spots will air on the top 5-10 stations, but it 

is possible that additional spots will be negotiated at the time of the buy. Additionally, the audio campaign 

will be placed on appropriate African American and Spanish language stations. On its own, the audio is 

estimated to reach just under 45% of adults aged 18+ in the Northern California area with an estimated 

average frequency of 4 times each. 

99. The Local Radio Notice to Hispanic and African American populations is not calculated 

into the overall measured reach and frequency of the Notice Program. 

100. Station selection will be based on performance in the market and ensuring a strong mix 

of formats to ensure delivery against the entire target audience. 

101. Terrestrial radio offers the ability to provide custom added value extensions. As part of 

our negotiations, we would require all stations to provide additional elements such as on-air exposure and 

the ability to tie-in with station events. Some opportunities we seek to utilize include handing out flyers 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 30

of 62
- 30 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

at concerts and remote broadcasts. 

102. In addition to terrestrial radio, Streaming services such as Pandora and Spotify, which are 

reflective of A18+ current audio habits, will be purchased to enhance the reach of the campaign. 

C. DIGITAL 

103. The Digital portion of the Notice Program will utilize a multi-pronged approach to drive 

potential claimants from awareness through the traditional time-tested marketing funnel, to conversions. 

Digital is particularly important in reaching the Fire Claimants in that many displaced persons, while not 

physically residing in their homes, still have access to their digital devices—in fact, many use and see 

them as a lifeline to the outside world. 

104. Some digital tactics that the Notice Program would feature included advanced targeting 

such as keyword, contextual, IP addresses, email addresses, and geography. Below is an overview of the 

different suggested digital tactics and their targeting capabilities. 

D. PROGRAMMATIC DISPLAY AND VIDEO 

105. Angeion utilizes advanced targeting, machine learning, and a known and verifiable target 

audience profile, to ensure that members of the target audience are reached online. Through this 

“programmatic” approach, Angeion’s focus will be on effectively reaching the prototypical Fire Claimant, 

rather than whitelisting specific websites. Purchasing display and video inventory programmatically 

provides the highest reach, allows for multiple targeting layers, and offers the most cost-efficient rates. 

106. The campaign will run across all devices including desktop, mobile, tablet, and other 

connected devices to ensure maximum reach. This is extremely beneficial when targeting a large 

audience such as this. Likewise, multiple targeting layers will be implemented into the programmatic buy 

to help ensure delivery to the most appropriate users, inclusive of search targeting, category contextual 

targeting, keyword contextual targeting, and site retargeting. Targeting users who are currently browsing 

or have recently browsed content in key categories will also help qualify impressions to ensure messaging 

is served to the most relevant audience. 

107. In addition to the previously mentioned programmatic tactics, the display campaign will 

include targeting around key word lists and IP addresses. Utilizing these types of lists, we can target 

residents in Lake, Sonoma, Napa, Mendocino, Nevada, Butte, and Humboldt counties based on their IP 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 31

of 62
- 31 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

addresses. In addition to residents, similar lists can be utilized to target employees or business owners in 

those areas. 

108. We recommend implementing a desktop and mobile campaign, utilizing standard IAB 

sizes (160x600, 300x250, 728x90, 300x600, 320x50, 300x50) for display, and 15-second videos for 

programmatic video. A frequency cap of 3x per month will be imposed to maximize reach. 

E. MAGAZINES 

109. Two print publications will be utilized to cover the western region of the United States. 

This will offer a mass awareness tactic that will not only reach the main Northern California geographic 

region but also the surrounding states to ensure reach against most displaced parties. The two publications 

that were selected were People and Sports Illustrated. These were chosen due to their reach against Adults 

18+ and the balanced demographic readership that the publications provide when used together. 

110. In order maximize efficiencies, the publication notice will be geo-targeted to the 

following states: California, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. Over the course of the 7-month campaign 

timeframe, each publication will have 4 regional insertions. 

 People – A print and digital publication that contains insightful and entertaining coverage 

into the most intriguing people from our culture. By revealing the human side to every 

story, People connects readers to their world. 

 Sports Illustrated – A print and digital publication that reports on the world of sports 

through in-depth articles, photography, and stories. The magazine’s philosophy and 

journalism covers what happened, why it happened, and what will happen next. 

F. NEWSPAPERS 

111. This Notice Program includes newspapers targeted to two different geographic regions. 

A collection of 14 local newspapers targeted to the 4 key DMAs (San Francisco, Sacramento, ChicoRedding, and Eureka) were chosen to provide a campaign-long print presence in this key market. Each 

publication will have 14 full page insertions spread out over the 7 months. These will be included in the 

Magazine Gross Impressions 

People Magazine 26,008,000 

Sports Illustrated Magazine 10,762,000 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 32

of 62
- 32 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

weekday publications of each paper. These publications are as follows: 

Newspaper Circulation 

Eureka Times Standard 23,000 

Bakersfield Californian 28,540 

Chico Enterprise-Record 13,000 

Paradise Post 9,400 

Ukiah Daily Journal 6,795 

Grass Valley Union 14,000 

Napa Valley Register 11,947 

East Bay Times 88,822 

Sacramento Bee 93,343 

Santa Rosa Press Democrat 46,295 

Fresno Bee 42,093 

Modesto Bee 25,240 

San Francisco Chronicle 179,117 

San Jose Mercury News 119,142 

112. In addition to the above publications, newspapers covering the remainder of the state were 

all selected given the intense displacement of the affected parties. These papers will expand the print 

reach across the state in the remaining major metropolitan areas. Each publication will include 7 full page 

insertions over the course of the 7-month campaign and will be in the weekday issues. These publications 

are: 

Newspaper Circulation 

LA Times 446,725 

Wall Street Journal – Northern CA & Southern CA Editions 150,381 

USA Today – Los Angeles and San Francisco Editions 62,764 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 33

of 62
- 33 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

G. SOCIAL MEDIA

113. The Notice Program also contemplates a robust multi-pronged approach to using social 

media to seed and disburse news of the Bar Date to the Fire Claimants. 

114. I have been advised that there are strong social media communities that have risen in the 

wake of the fires that, along with certain chatrooms and community forums, act as a hub of information 

for the Fire Claimants. Angeion will actively post and moderate among the various sites, as an 

authoritative voice advising Fire Claimants of answers to frequently asked questions, dispelling rumors, 

and providing links to official documents. 

115. Additionally, a strong paid social media component will run via Facebook and Instagram. 

Social media will be targeted to the Northern California area and provides strong reach and frequency for 

the campaign. Social tactics typically generate high impact and strong conversions for campaigns. Ad 

units will include standard banners as well as video placements. 

116. In addition to demographic and geotargeting, we will use Facebook and Instagram to 

create a custom audience, which has proved enormously effective in driving conversion in other due 

process notice programs that Angeion has implemented. A custom audience in this case would be created 

by importing all known (and derived) Fire Claimant email addresses into the Facebook platform. 

Facebook can identify which of the uploaded email addresses are the primary addresses associated with 

unique Facebook or Instagram accounts. Facebook then provides the ability to target those actual users 

via banner ad directly in the users’ timeline. We can also create lookalike models to reach people with 

similar characteristic to those in the email lists. 

117. Angeion also employs Lotame, a demand management platform (“DMP”), as well 

as Integral Ad Science (“IAS”), an online ad verification and security provider, to provide a greater 

quality of service to ad performance. 

118. Lotame allows Angeion to learn more about the online audiences that are being 

reached through pixels attached behind the scenes. Angeion will be able to create a profile for those 

users who are served impressions and will be able to better understand the type of user who is 

clicking on the banner. From this data, demographic profiles can be refined and leveraged for 

changes in targeting strategies to increase the overall performance of the digital campaign. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 34

of 62
- 34 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

119. Angeion also utilizes Integral Ad Science (“IAS”), the leading ad verification 

company to recognize and foil fraudulent internet activity. IAS has received the Media Rating 

Council (“MRC”) accreditation for Sophisticated Invalid Traffic (“SIVT”) detection for desktop 

and mobile web traffic, which adds a critical level of safety to the Notice Program. 

120. Angeion will also cause the Bar Date to be promoted on Twitter. Our methodology 

includes an “active listening” component wherein we monitor Twitter traffic for discussion relevant 

to the fires, and actively provide notice, and/or answers to frequently asked questions via Twitter 

as appropriate. This service is not measurable in terms of reach and frequency but provides an 

invaluable service to those affected individuals seeking further information. 

H. OUT-OF-HOME 

121. The notice plan will include Out-of-Home in both the Northern California area and 

the entire state of California. Out-of-home is a very strong awareness tactic and efficiently drives 

significant reach. To focus in on the primary geography, a large portion of the Out-of-Home will 

be placed in the 4 DMAs mentioned previously. Out-of-Home will include a mix of digital and 

static units to maximize overall reach and efficiencies. The recommendation includes 54 digital 

units and 18 static units in the Northern California area for the first three months of the campaign. 

In addition to the Local focus, there will be support in both Los Angeles and San Diego. In Los 

Angeles, 10 digital units are recommended to reach potential claimants. In San Diego, 29 digital 

transit shelters and 10 digital billboards are recommended to reach potential claimants. 

I. EARNED MEDIA 

122. A critical component of the TCC Notice Program is a sustained media presence via 

earned media; this is effectuated using two unified public relations partners—one on the east coast 

and one in the Bay Area. The fires have proved to be the ultimate public interest story and have 

been covered by local, national and international press. The Public Relations portion of the 

campaign is designed to guarantee a continued lifecycle in the press concerning the importance and 

timeliness of the Bar Date. Using direct media outreach, press conferences, regular news releases, 

content development and official spokespeople, we will generate substantial earned media. This 

includes personally contacting the media and leveraging standing relationships to open 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 35

of 62
- 35 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

conversations and ultimately secure media coverage of the Bar Date. A list of Target Media Outlets 

is attached hereto as Exhibit E. 

123. Sustained media coverage is critical considering the massive displacement that 

many Fire Claimants are dealing with, but also because of the permanent preclusions that can occur 

in the event of a victim’s failure to be made aware of the Bar Date. 

124. The earned media strategy will commence with a campaign kick-off in northern 

California, expand through the state, and have the ultimate intent of generating national media 

coverage. 

125. All news media outreach will complement digital and social media, paid advertising, 

and grassroots advocacy for a fully integrated campaign for maximum exposure. 

126. Among other tasks, the earned media team will help draft media advisories and news 

releases to attract coverage, and orchestrate a media campaign “launch,” including a news 

conference with fire victims. A professional PR staff will advise on the appropriate venues, visual 

cues, backdrops, order of speakers and the proper roles for spokespeople to play in the presentation. 

127. Other strategies include assisting with scheduling appearances on northern 

California TV and radio talk programs; following up with reporters/editors in the Chico-Redding 

media market directly, to make sure that any outlet that desires an opportunity to directly talk with 

the people who have been affected will be matched with willing participant(s). 

128. The earned media effort will also engage statewide media including the Associated 

Press as well as national media outreach, including pursuing and reacting to national media 

inquiries. Primary national targets include network morning shows, evening news broadcasts, cable 

news and CNBC. 

IV. GRASS ROOTS OUTREACH AND EXPERIENTIAL MARKETING 

129. Mass media is vital to generate broad awareness, but consumers also look to friends, 

family members, faith groups, and co-workers to get objective unbiased opinions. 

130. Given that people typically only tell others information that is relevant to that 

audience, word of mouth is by its own nature, is also quite targeted, allowing us to reach specific 

individuals that might not otherwise be reached by mass media, such as those left homeless or 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 36

of 62
- 36 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

displaced after the fires. 

131. Our word of mouth strategy will include both grassroots outreach and experiential 

marketing.14 Designing messages to generate interest and seeding those messages in the 

appropriate communities to drive diffusion, will help increase the credibility of our message. 

132. We will utilize professional experiential marketers to hand-distribute notice forms 

for a total of 35 days across the seven counties affected by the fires. The team will distribute flyers 

both to individuals and institutions that make sense in the various communities, including leaving 

flyers at high traffic locations such as community centers, restaurants, and houses of worship. 

133. The Notice Program also contemplates direct outreach to any remaining community 

centers and meeting places, notice through churches, social service agencies, support groups, online 

forums and other trusted community resources. 

CONCLUSION 

134. In my opinion, the Debtors Supplemental Notice Plan will not provide full and 

proper notice to the Fire Claimants. It is further my opinion that it cannot be shown that DSNP 

was reasonably calculated to provide proper notice. It lacks essential information, fails to validate 

its audience, and appears to be the sort of “mere gesture” the Supreme Court rejected in Mullane. 

135. It is my opinion that the Tort Claimant Committee’s Notice Program will provide 

the best notice practicable under the circumstances of this case, conforms to all aspects of the 

applicable Federal Rules, comports with the guidance for effective notice articulated in the 

Northern District of California’s 2018 Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements and the 

Manual for Complex Litigation 4th. 

136. At the appropriate time, Angeion Group may also develop and implement 

subsequent notice efforts as agreed to by the parties and/or directed by the Court, including a 

reminder notice effort in advance of the Bar Date. 

 

14 Engagement marketing, sometimes called “experiential marketing”, “event marketing”, “on-ground marketing”, 

“live marketing”, “participation marketing”, “Loyalty Marketing”, or “special events” is a marketing strategy that 

directly engages consumers and invites and encourages them to participate in the evolution of a brand or a brand 

experience. Rather than looking at consumers as passive receivers of messages, engagement marketers believe that 

consumers should be actively involved in the production and co-creation of marketing programs, developing a 

relationship with the brand. Wikipedia, available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engagement_marketing. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 37

of 62
- 37 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

137. After effectuating the Notice Program, Angeion will provide a final report verifying 

its effective implementation. 

138. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: May 30, 2019 

 ________ 

 STEVEN WEISBROT 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 38

of 62
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTE TL E R L LP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

EXHIBIT A 

STATEMENT OF WORK AND PROJECT PROPOSAL 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 39

of 62
Angeion Group

Page 1 of 4

1650 Arch Street • Suite 2210 • Philadelphia PA 19103

STATEMENT OF WORK AND PROJECT PROPOSAL

DATE: May 31, 2019

PROJECT NAME: PG&E Mailing and Media

REQUESTED BY: Karen M. Lockhart, Chairperson

Official Committee of Tort Claimants

c/o Robert Julian

Baker & Hostetler LLP

11601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90025

SCOPE OF WORK & COST BREAKDOWN:

1. Scope of Work. As the Fire Claim Bar Date Noticing Agent, Angeion Group, LLC (“Angeion”) agrees to 

perform the below notice and administration services (“Services”):

a. Develop and implement a notice program (the “Notice Program”) for the Fire Claim Bar Date. 

The Notice Program will provide for both direct notice by U.S. mail and email, and indirect notice 

through an integrated, multimedia campaign. The Notice Program will be tailored to take into 

consideration that many Fire Claimants (1) have had to relocate, are homeless or in temporary 

housing, (2) may be reliant on their mobile devices for receiving news or notices, (3) do not speak 

or read English and require notice in other languages, and (4) are demographically and socioeconomically diverse. 

b. Conduct an investigation into the identity and current contact information for known and 

reasonably ascertainable Fire Claimants. The investigation will include researching public 

records, third-party data aggregation sources, and if necessary, requesting authorization from the 

Court to issue subpoenas. Angeion will also utilize the U.S. Postal Service (“USPS”) National 

Change of Address database to identify updated address information for individuals and 

businesses who have moved in the last four years and who filed a change of address card with the 

USPS. Angeion will also perform verification searches (also known as skip tracing) for Fire 

Claimants whose notices are returned as undeliverable by the USPS without a forwarding address.

c. Implement an integrated paid media campaign which will utilize state-of-the-art targeted internet 

banner advertisements, custom social media campaigns, a bespoke broadcast radio/television 

campaign, a network of digital and static billboards, a combination of local, regional, and national 

print publications, and a nationwide, yet geographically tailored, public relations campaign.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 40

of 62
Angeion Group

Page 2 of 4

d. Implement an earned media campaign designed to take advantage of the substantial news coverage 

the Fires and Chapter 11 Cases have already garnered and continue to drive media to cover the 

story at a local, regional and national level.

e. Engage in a grassroots word-of-mouth campaign and experiential marketing across all of the 

counties affected by the fires.

f. Provide information regarding Prime Clerk LLC’s (“Prime Clerk”) website and toll-free number 

in order to enable Fire Claimants to obtain additional information regarding the Fire Claim Bar 

Date and Fire Proof of Claim Form.

g. Perform such other tasks as may be agreed to by Angeion and directed by the TCC or order of any 

court having jurisdiction over the TCC.

2. Additional Services. Services not specifically identified in the Project Proposal (“Additional Services”) 

that are requested by the Official Committee of Tort Claimants (the “TCC” or “Client”) or are otherwise 

required in order for Angeion to complete performance of its administrative responsibilities are subject to 

additional costs and fees. Any Additional Services that extend or expand the scope of work described 

herein and outlined in the Angeion Group Project Proposal shall be mutually agreed upon between the 

Client and Angeion Group in writing, with the approval of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Northern District of California and shall be incorporated herein and subject to the terms of this Statement of 

Work.

3. Cost Breakdown. A Project Proposal with estimated costs is attached. 

TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

1. Services. Angeion agrees to perform the Services described above and in the attached Project Proposal and 

this Statement of Work (collectively, the “Agreement”). Client represents and warrants to Angeion that, 

subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, Client has all required (i) legal rights, and (ii) consents of third 

parties to request the Services to be performed by Angeion hereunder and that any documents or data 

supplied to Angeion hereunder do not violate any law or rights of third parties.

2. Price and Payment. PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (hereinafter “Debtors”) 

agree to pay Angeion pursuant to the above-referenced Project Proposal and terms of payment contained 

herein. Any modifications to the Project Proposal shall be governed by the terms set forth in this Statement 

of Work. Angeion shall be paid as provided in the Order approving the Application of the Official 

Committee of Tort Claimants Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1103 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014 and 5002 to Retain 

and Employ Angeion Group, LLC, as a Fire Claim Bar Date Noticing Agent Effective as of May 22, 2019.

3. Confidentiality. Angeion acknowledges that it may have access to certain confidential and/or proprietary 

materials and information of Client in connection with the Services. All such information will remain the 

property of Client along with any electronic or other versions of such information created by Angeion 

hereunder. Except as expressly provided to the contrary in this Agreement or any addendum to this 

Agreement, all Client data is subject to deletion from Angeion’s data storage systems 30 days following 

delivery of the data to Client. Angeion represents and warrants that it will use good faith efforts to 

maintain the confidentiality of all such information and will not sell, license or provide such information to 

any other person or entity without the express written consent of Client. Angeion shall take reasonable 

steps to ensure that its employees, independent contractors and agents comply with the terms of this 

paragraph. Angeion’s obligations under this paragraph shall survive termination of this Agreement.

4. Warranties, Limitation of Liability. Angeion warrants that Angeion’s Services and work product hereunder 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 41

of 62
Angeion Group

Page 3 of 4

will meet industry standards. Any Services or work product of Angeion which do not meet industry 

standards will be redone by Angeion at no additional charge to Client. Client must notify Angeion of any 

problems within 30 days of data delivery or Services performed. Angeion will make reasonable efforts to 

meet Client deadlines but specifically does not warrant meeting specific deadlines or the timeliness of 

completion of any project. Except as expressly stated in the Statement of Work to the contrary, 

a. THE WARRANTIES CONTAINED HEREIN ARE IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER 

WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, ON OR WITH RESPECT 

TO ANGEION’S WORK PRODUCT HEREUNDER INCLUDING, WITHOUT 

LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED CONDITIONS OR WARRANTIES OF 

MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND ANY 

OTHER WARRANTY OBLIGATION ON THE PART OF ANGEION. 

5. Indemnification. Debtors shall indemnify, hold harmless, and provide contribution and reimbursement to 

Angeion and its personnel in connection with any disputes arising in connection with Angeion’s 

engagement as a noticing agent except to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction shall have 

determined by a final, non-appealable judgment that losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities 

arising out of Angeion’s engagement as a noticing agent were primarily caused by Angeion’s gross 

negligence, negligence, bad faith, or willful misconduct. 

6. Bank Accounts. Client may request that a bank account(s) be established in this matter (“Client 

Account”). Upon such request, Angeion shall be authorized by Client to establish accounts with financial 

institution(s) as the agent for Client or, may establish accounts with other commercial financial institution, 

if otherwise agreed to by the Parties. Angeion may, in some instances, derive financial benefits from 

commercial financial institutions related to monies, including settlement funds, on deposit or invested 

including, but not limited to, discounts provided on certain banking services and fees. Any Client Accounts 

established by Angeion shall be at commercial financial institutions with credit ratings of “A” or higher. 

Client agrees that it shall assume all risk for monies held in deposit accounts with commercial financial 

institutions selected pursuant to this section and Angeion shall have no liability for any losses in said 

accounts including credit losses or bank default. 

7. Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement prior to its scheduled 

completion, subsequent to the terms and conditions contained herein. If a Party elects to terminate this 

Agreement, that Party shall provide at least 10 days written notice to the other Party. If this Agreement is 

terminated for convenience by Client, Angeion will be paid an amount equal to the value of the Services 

provided prior to Angeion’s receipt of such termination notice plus the unamortized project start-up costs 

incurred by Angeion. If this Agreement is terminated for convenience by Angeion, Angeion will be paid 

an amount equal to the value of the Services provided prior to Angeion’s delivery of termination notice to 

Client. 

8. Miscellaneous.

a. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties. No 

representations were made or relied on by either Party, other than those that are expressly set forth 

herein. This Agreement may only be amended by a writing signed by both Parties.

b. Notices. Notices by a Party under this Agreement shall be deemed given when the same shall have 

been mailed, provided the same is mailed registered or certified, return receipt requested, and the 

postage is prepaid, addressed to the other Party at the address listed above, or to such other address 

as the party may have subsequently furnished in writing to the other for this purpose.

c. Force Majeure. The Parties hereto shall be excused for the period of any delay in the performance 

of any obligations hereunder when prevented from so doing by cause or causes beyond such 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 42

of 62
Angeion Group

Page 4 of 4

Party's reasonable control which shall include, without limitation, labor disputes, civil commotion, 

war, war-like operations, invasion, rebellion, hostilities, military or usurped power, sabotage, 

governmental regulations or controls, software malfunction, hardware malfunction, computer 

viruses, inability to obtain any required materials or services, fire or other casualty, or through an 

act of God. 

d. Modifications. Any modifications to this Agreement and/or the Exhibits shall be set forth in 

writing. Angeion will be promptly advised of any material changes to Client’s hardware, software 

and project specifications as such changes may affect the Services of Angeion hereunder.

e. Jurisdiction and Venue. The Parties agree that with respect to any dispute arising under or in 

connection with this Agreement that the exclusive jurisdiction and venue shall reside with the 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, and service of process by 

certified mail to the addresses for notice set forth in this Agreement. 

ACCEPTANCE AND AUTHORIZATION

The terms and conditions set forth herein shall become effective upon the execution of this Agreement by Client and 

Angeion.

Company: _____________________

Name: _____________________

Position: _____________________

Signature: _____________________

Date: _____________________

Company: Angeion Group, LLC 

Name: Steven Weisbrot 

Position: Partner 

Signature: ___________________________

Date: May 31, 2019 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 43

of 62
Total Cost Estimate: $21,813,746.00

Estimated Media/Notice Program Budget: $12,875,000.00

Estimated Notice Expenses (not including postage): $1,895,614.50

Estimated Postage Expenses: $6,592,587.00

Estimated Project Management/Public Relations/Miscellaneous: $450,544.00

Partner/Notice Expert Per Hour: $495.00

Partner Per Hour: $375.00

Advertising/Marketing Director Per Hour: $250.00

Marketing Associate Per Hour: $125.00

Project Manager Per Hour: $135.00

Clerical/Project Support Associate: $65.00

Notification

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 44

of 62
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTE TL E R L LP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

EXHIBIT B 

RELEVANT JUDICIAL RECOGNITION OF 

ANGEION GROUP’S NOTICE PROGRAMS 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 45

of 62
 RECENT JUDICIAL RECOGNITION 

IN RE CHRYSLER-DODGE-JEEP ECODIESEL MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION, Case No. 17-md-02777 (EMC)

The Honorable Edward M. Chen, United States District Court, Northern District of California (February 11, 

2019): 

“Also, the parties went through a sufficiently rigorous selection process to select a settlement 

administrator. See Proc. Guidance for Class Action Sett. ¶ 2; see also Cabraser Decl. ¶¶ 9-10. 

While the settlement administration costs are significant – an estimated $1.5 million – they are 

adequately justified given the size of the class and the relief being provided.

In addition, the Court finds that the language of the class notices (short and long-form) is 

appropriate and that the means of notice – which includes mail notice, electronic notice, 

publication notice, and social media “marketing” – is the “best notice . . . practicable under the 

circumstances.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B); see also Proc. Guidance for Class Action Sett. ¶¶ 3-

5, 9 (addressing class notice, opt-outs, and objections). The Court notes that the means of notice 

has changed somewhat, as explained in the Supplemental Weisbrot Declaration filed on February 

8, 2019, so that notice will be more targeted and effective. See generally Docket No. 525 (Supp. 

Weisbrot Decl.) (addressing, inter alia, press release to be distributed via national newswire 

service, digital and social media marketing designed to enhance notice, and “reminder” first-class 

mail notice when AEM becomes available).

Finally, the parties have noted that the proposed settlement bears similarity to the settlement in 

the Volkswagen MDL. See Proc. Guidance for Class Action Sett. ¶ 11.”

MAYHEW v. KAS DIRECT, LLC, Case No. 16-cv- 6981 (VB)

The Honorable Vincent J. Briccetti, United States District Court, Southern District of New York (June 26, 2018): 

“In connection with their motion, plaintiffs provide the declaration of Steven Weisbrot, Esq., a 

principal at the firm Angeion Group, LLC, which will serve as the notice and settlement 

administrator in this case. (Doc. #101, Ex. F: Weisbrot Decl.) According to Mr. Weisbrot, he has 

been responsible for the design and implementation of hundreds of class action administration 

plans, has taught courses on class action claims administration, and has given testimony to the 

Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure on the role of direct mail, 

email, and digital media in due process notice. Mr. Weisbrot states that the internet banner 

advertisement campaign will be responsive to search terms relevant to “baby wipes, baby products, 

baby care products, detergents, sanitizers, baby lotion, [and] diapers,” and will target users who 

are currently browsing or recently browsed categories “such as parenting, toddlers, baby care, [and] 

organic products.” (Weisbrot Decl. ¶ 18). According to Mr. Weisbrot, the internet banner 

advertising campaign will reach seventy percent of the proposed class members at least three 

times each. (Id. ¶ 9). Accordingly, the Court approves of the manner of notice proposed by the 

parties as it is reasonable and the best practicable option for confirming the class members 

receive notice.”

HALVORSON v. TALENTBIN, INC., Case No. 3:15-cv-05166-JCS

The Honorable Joseph C. Spero (July 25, 2017): 

“The Court finds that the Notice provided for in the Order of Preliminary Approval of Settlement 

has been provided to the Settlement Class, and the Notice provided to the Settlement Class 

constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and was in full compliance with the 

notice requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, due process, the United 

States Constitution, and any other applicable law. The Notice apprised the members of the 

Settlement Class of the pendency of the litigation; of all material elements of the proposed 

settlement, including but not limited to the relief afforded the Settlement Class under the 

Settlement Agreement; of the res judicata effect on members of the Settlement Class and of their 

opportunity to object to, comment on, or opt-out of, the Settlement; of the identity of Settlement Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 46 Class Counsel and of information necessary to contact Settlement Class Counsel; and of the right of 62
 RECENT JUDICIAL RECOGNITION 

to appear at the Fairness Hearing. Full opportunity has been afforded to members of the 

Settlement Class to participate in the Fairness Hearing. Accordingly, the Court determines that all 

Final Settlement Class Members are bound by this Final Judgment in accordance with the terms 

provided herein.” 

IN RE: ASHLEY MADISON CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION, MDL No. 2669, 

Case No. 4:15- MD- 02669 (JAR)

The Honorable John A. Ross (July 21, 2017): 

“The Court further finds that the method of disseminating Notice, as set forth in the Motion, the 

Declaration of Steven Weisbrot, Esq. on Adequacy of Notice Program, dated July 13, 2017, and 

the Parties’ Stipulation—including an extensive and targeted publication campaign composed of 

both consumer magazine publications in People and Sports Illustrated, as well as serving 

11,484,000 highly targeted digital banner ads to reach the prospective class members that will 

deliver approximately 75.3% reach with an average frequency of 3.04 —is the best method of 

notice practicable under the circumstances and satisfies all requirements provided in Rule 

23(c)(2)(B) and all Constitutional requirements including those of due process.

The Court further finds that the Notice fully satisfies Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and the requirements of due process; provided, that the Parties, by agreement, may 

revise the Notice, the Claim Form, and other exhibits to the Stipulation, in ways that are not 

material or ways that are appropriate to update those documents for purposes of accuracy.”

REMIJAS V. NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP LLC, Case No. 1:14-cv-01735

The Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, (June 21, 2017): 

“The Court finds that the form, content and method of giving notice to the Class as described in 

Paragraph 7 of this Order and the Settlement Agreement (including the exhibits thereto): (a) will 

constitute the best practicable notice to the Settlement Class; (b) are reasonably calculated, under 

the circumstances, to apprise Settlement Class Members of the pendency of the action, the terms 

of the proposed settlement, and their rights under the proposed settlement, including but not 

limited to their rights to object to or exclude themselves from the proposed settlement and other 

rights under the terms of the Settlement Agreement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, 

adequate, and sufficient notice to all Class Members and other persons entitled to receive notice; 

and (d) meet all applicable requirements of law, including Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c) and (e), and the 

Due Process Clause(s) of the United States Constitution. The Court further finds that the Notice is 

written in plain language, uses simple terminology, and is designed to be readily understandable 

by Class Members.” 

TRAXLER v. PPG INDUSTRIES INC., Case No. 1:15-cv-00912-DAP (N.D. Ohio)

The Honorable Dan Aaron Polster (April 27, 2017): 

“The Court hereby approves the form and procedure for disseminating notice of the proposed 

settlement to the Settlement Class as set forth in the Agreement. The Court finds that the 

proposed Notice Plan contemplated constitutes the best notice practicable under the 

circumstances and is reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Settlement Class 

Members of the pendency of the Action and their right to object to the proposed settlement or opt 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 47 out of the Settlement Class in full compliance with the requirements of applicable law, including 

of 62
 RECENT JUDICIAL RECOGNITION 

the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution and Rules 23(c) and (e). In addition, 

Class Notice clearly and concisely states in plain, easily understood language: (i) the nature of the 

action; (ii) the definition of the certified Settlement Class; (iii) the claims and issues of the 

Settlement Class; (iv) that a Settlement Class Member may enter an appearance through an 

attorney if the member so desires; (v) that the Court will exclude from the Settlement Class any 

member who requests exclusion; (vi) the time and manner for requesting exclusion; and (vii) the 

binding effect of a class judgment on members under Rule 23(c)(3).” 

IN RE: THE HOME DEPOT, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION,- 

Case No.: 1:14- md-02583-TWT

The Honorable Thomas W. Thrash (March 10, 2017): 

“The Court finds that the form, content, and method of giving notice to the settlement class as 

described in the settlement agreement and exhibits: (a) constitute the best practicable notice to the 

settlement class; (b) are reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise settlement 

class members of the pendency of the action, the terms of the proposed settlement, and their 

rights under the proposed settlement; (c) are reasonable and constitute due, adequate, and 

sufficient notice to those persons entitled to receive notice; and (d) satisfy the requirements of 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the constitutional requirement of due process, and any other 

legal requirements. The Court further finds that the notice is written in plain language, uses 

simple terminology, and is designed to be readily understandable by settlement class members.” 

ROY v. TITLEFLEX CORPORATION, Case No. 384003

The Honorable Ronald B. Rubin, Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland (February 24, 2017): 

“What is impressive to me about this settlement is in addition to all the usual recitation of road 

racing litanies is that there is going to be a) public notice of a real nature and b) about a matter 

concerning not just money but public safety and then folks will have the knowledge to decide for 

themselves whether to take steps to protect themselves or not. And that’s probably the best thing 

a government can do is to arm their citizens with knowledge and then the citizens can make 

decision. To me that is a key piece of this deal. I think the notice provisions are exquisite.” 

(Emphasis added).

IN RE LG FRONT LOADING WASHING MACHINE CLASS ACTION LITIGATION, Civ. No. 08- 

[MISSING] (MCA)(LDW)

Honorable Madeline Cox Arleo (June 17, 2016): 

“This Court further approves the proposed methods for giving notice of the Settlement to the 

Members of the Settlement Class, as reflected in the Settlement Agreement and the joint motion 

for preliminary approval. The Court has reviewed the notices attached as exhibits to the 

Settlement, the plan for distributing the Summary Notices to the Settlement Class, and the 

plan for the Publication Notice's publication in print periodicals and on the internet, and finds 

that the Members of the Settlement Class will receive the best notice practicable under the 

circumstances. The Court specifically approves the Parties' proposal to use reasonable diligence 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 48 to identify potential class members and an associated mailing and/or email address in the 

of 62
 RECENT JUDICIAL RECOGNITION 

Company's records, and their proposal to direct the ICA to use this information to send absent 

class members notice both via first class mail and email. The Court further approves the plan for 

the Publication Notice's publication in two national print magazines and on the internet. The 

Court also approves payment of notice costs as provided in the Settlement. The Court finds that 

these procedures, carried out with reasonable diligence, will constitute the best notice practicable 

under the circumstances and will satisfy.” 

FENLEY V. APPLIED CONSULTANTS, INC., Civ. No. 15-259

Honorable Mark R. Hornak (June 16, 2016): 

“The Court would note that it approved notice provisions of the settlement agreement in the 

proceedings today. That was all handled by the settlement and administrator Angeion. The 

notices were sent. The class list utilized the Postal Service's national change of address database 

along with using certain proprietary and other public resources to verify addresses. the 

requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(e) (l), and Due Process.... The Court finds 

and concludes that the mechanisms and methods of notice to the class as identified were 

reasonably calculated to provide all notice required by the due process clause, the applicable rules 

and statutory provisions, and that the results of the efforts of Angeion were highly successful and 

fulfilled all of those requirements.” (Emphasis added). 

FUENTES v. UNIRUSH, LLC d/b/a UNIRUSH FINANCIAL SERVICES, Case No. 15-CV-8372 (JPO)

Honorable J. Paul Oetken (May 16, 2016). 

“The Court approves, as to form, content, and distribution, the Claim Form attached to the 

Settlement Agreement as Exhibit A, the Notice Plan, and all forms of Notice to the Settlement 

Class as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Exhibits B-D, thereto, and finds that such 

Notice is the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and that the Notice complies fully 

with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court also finds that the 

Notice constitutes valid, due and sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto, and meets the 

requirements of Due Process. The Court further finds that the Notice is reasonably calculated to, 

under all circumstances, reasonably apprise members of the Settlement Class of the pendency of 

the Actions, the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and the right to object to the settlement and 

to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. The Parties, by agreement, may revise the 

Notices and Claim Form in ways that are not material, or in ways that are appropriate to update 

those documents for purposes of accuracy or formatting for publication.”

IN RE: WHIRLPOOL CORP. FRONTLOADING WASHER PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 

MDL No. 2001 

Honorable Christopher A. Boyko (May 12, 2016): 

“The Court, having reviewed the proposed Summary Notices, the proposed FAQ, the proposed 

Publication Notice, the proposed Claim Form, and the proposed plan for distributing and 

disseminating each of them, finds and concludes that the proposed plan for distributing and 

disseminating each of them will provide the best notice practicable under the circumstances and 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 49 satisfies all requirements of federal and state laws and due process.”

of 62
 RECENT JUDICIAL RECOGNITION 

SATERIALE v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., Case No. 09 08394 (CAS)

Honorable Christina A. Snyder (May 3, 2016): 

“The Court finds that the Notice provided to the Settlement Class pursuant to the Settlement 

Agreement and the Preliminary Approval Order has been successful, was the best notice 

practicable under the circumstances and (1) constituted notice that was reasonably calculated, 

under the circumstances, to apprise members of the Settlement Class of the pendency of the 

Action, their right to object to the Settlement, and their right to appear at the Final Approval 

Hearing; (2) was reasonable and constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons 

entitled to receive notice; and (3) met all applicable requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, Due Process, and the rules of the Court.”

FERRERA v. SNYDER’S-LANCE, INC., Case No. 13-CV-62496

Honorable Joan A. Lenard (February 12, 2016): 

“The Court approves, as to form and content, the Long-Form Notice and Short- Form Publication 

Notice attached to the Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class 

Action Settlement as Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Stipulation of Settlement. The Court also approves 

the procedure for disseminating notice of the proposed settlement to the Settlement Class and the 

Claim Form, as set forth in the Notice and Media Plan attached to the Memorandum in Support of 

Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement as Exhibits G. The Court finds that 

the notice to be given constitutes the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and 

constitutes valid, due, and sufficient notice to the Settlement Class in full compliance with the 

requirements of applicable law, including the Due Process Clause of the United States 

Constitution.” 

IN RE: POOL PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTION MARKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL No. 2328

Honorable Sarah S. Vance (December 31, 2014): 

“To make up for the lack of individual notice to the remainder of the class, the parties propose a 

print and web-based plan for publicizing notice. The Court welcomes the inclusion of web- based 

forms of communication in the plan. The Court finds that the proposed method of notice satisfies 

the requirements of Rule 23(c)(2)(B) and due process. The direct emailing of notice to those 

potential class members for whom Hayward and Zodiac have a valid email address, along with 

publication of notice in print and on the web, is reasonably calculated to apprise class members of 

the settlement. Moreover, the plan to combine notice for the Zodiac and Hayward settlements 

should streamline the process and avoid confusion that might otherwise be caused by a 

proliferation of notices for different settlements. Therefore, the Court approves the proposed 

notice forms and the plan of notice.”

SOTO v. THE GALLUP ORGANIZATION, INC., Case No. 13-61747(MGC/EGT)

Honorable Marcia G. Cooke (June 16, 2015): 

“The Court approves the form and substance of the notice of class action settlement described in 

¶ 8 of the Agreement and attached to the Agreement as Exhibits A, C and D. The proposed form 

and method for notifying the Settlement Class Members of the settlement and its terms and 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 50 conditions meet the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B) and due process, constitute the 

of 62
 RECENT JUDICIAL RECOGNITION 

best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to 

all persons and entities entitled to the notice. The Court finds that the proposed notice is clearly 

designed to advise the Settlement Class Members of their rights.”

OTT V MORTGAGE INVESTORS CORPORATION OF OHIO, INC., Case No. 3:14-CV-00645 

Honorable Janice M. Stewart (July 20, 2015): 

“The Notice Plan, in form, method, and content, fully complies with the requirements of Rule 23 

and due process, constitutes the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and is due and 

sufficient notice to all persons entitled thereto. The Court finds that the Notice Plan is reasonably 

calculated to, under all circumstances, reasonably apprise the persons in the Settlement Class of 

the pendency of this action, the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and the right to object to the 

Settlement and to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class.”

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 51

of 62
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTE TL E R L LP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

EXHIBIT C 

TCC TIMELINE AND DELIVERY UNITS 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 52

of 62
Media Delivery

OOHLocal Digital Units 54 UnitsLocal Static Units 18 UnitsFlyer Distribution 5x Days/CountyAd Tech FeesProductionDigitalProgrammatic Display 60,000,000 ImpsResident List Display 20,000,000 ImpsFacebook Newsfeed 33,000,000 ImpsOTT/Connected TV Display 6,600,000 ImpsAd Tech FeesPrint14 Local Newspapers 14x Full PageVideo

Spot Market Television - :30s 900 TRPs per MarketOTT/Connected TV Video - :30s 5,700,000 ImpsAudio

Spot Market Radio - :60s 2,100 TRPs per MarketTotalMedia DeliveryOOHLos Angeles Digital Units 10 UnitsSan Diego Digital Transit 29 UnitsSan Diego Static Units 10 UnitsAd Tech FeesDigitalInsurance Company List Display 200,000 ImpressionsFacebook Newsfeed 28,000,000PrintLos Angeles Times 7x Full PageWall Street Journal California Edition 7x Full PageUSA Today 7x Full PageVideo

Programmatic Video - :30s 6,250,000 ImpsAudio

Pandora Audio Everywhere - :30s 6,700,000 ImpsTotalMedia DeliveryDigitalProgrammatic Display 30,000,000 ImpsPrintPeople Magazine 4x Full PageSports Illustrated 4x Full PageTotalMedia DeliveryDigitalProgrammatic Display 20,000,000 ImpsSite Retargeting Display 5,000,000 ImpsFacebook Email Matching 5,000,000 ImpsTotal

National

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 

Western US - California, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 

Month 5

Month 3 Month 4 Month 5

Local - San Francisco, Sacramento, Chico-Redding, and Eureka DMAs

Month 3 Month 4 

California

Month 1 Month 2

Month 1 Month 2 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 

of 62
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTE TL E R L LP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

EXHIBIT D 

VISUAL COMPARISION TCC’S AND DEBTORS’ 

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE PROGRAMS 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 54

of 62
ANGEION

MEDIA PLAN

PG&E'S 

PROPOSED 

MEDIA PLAN

- Strategic

recommendation

based on indepth

audience and

market research

- 7 month campaign

- 95% Reach

- 52 Frequency

- 318 Million

impressions (Local)

- Expanded

geographic

approach (i.e.

California, Western

US States, National)

- Comprehensive

media mix to reach

fragmented target

audience

TRADITIONAL 

BROADCAST

- 900 TRPs

- 75% Reach

- 10.62 Frequency

- 77.7 Million

impressions

- :30 ads

- English & Spanish

language

OTT/STREAMING

- 6.6 Million

impressions

-6% Reach

-10 Frequency

- :15 ads

- English & Spanish

language

-All video is in key

DMAs

TERRESTRIAL

- 2100 TRPs

- 66% Reach

- 30.95 Frequency

- 201 Million

impressions

- :60 ads for

terrestrial

- English & Spanish

language

- 6 key MSAs

STREAMING

- 6.7 Million

impressions

-:30 ads for

streaming

- English & Spanish

language

- Streaming is state

wide

- 4x insertions in

People

- 4x insertions in

Sports Illustrated

- Full page

- 8 Million

impressions

- 36% Reach

- 2.26 Frequency

- Regionally targeted

to Western states

- 7x in Wall Street

Journal, USA Today,

LA Times

-14x in 14 local

papers

- Full page ads

- 22% Reach

-7 Frequency

- 15 Million

impressions

LOCAL

- 54 Digital

Billboards

- 18 Static Billboards

- Flyer Distribution

- 55% Reach

- 17 Frequency

-199 Million

IMPRESSIONS

STATEWIDE

- 10 Digital

Billboards in Los

Angeles

- 29 Digital Transit

Shelters in San

Diego

-10 Static Billboards

in San Diego

-62 Million

additional

impressions

PROGRAMMATIC 

DISPLAY AND VIDEO 

LOCAL: 

- Multipronged 

targeting approach

- 41% Reach

- 15 Frequency

- 60 Million impressions

CALIFORNIA:

- Video only

- Multipronged 

targeting approach

- 6.25 Million 

impressions

WESTERN STATES: 

- Multipronged 

targeting approach

- 30 Million impressions

NATIONAL:

- Multipronged 

targeting approach& 

Site Retargeting

- 25 Million impressions

SOCIAL MEDIA

LOCAL: 

- Multipronged

targeting approach

- 23% Reach

- 1.5 Frequency

- 33 Million

impressions

CALIFORNIA:

- Multipronged

targeting approach

- 28 Million

impressions

NATIONAL:

- Email matching

- 5 Million

impressions

- Lack of target

definition

- Unclear what the

total reach and

frequency of the

campaign would be

- Subpar media

weight over a 90 day

period

- N/A - 3x in Wall Street - N/A

Journal, USA Today,

LA Times

-3x in 11 local

papers

- Estimated to be

fractional page ads

-150 TRPs total across TV and Radio

-1.5x frequency

-English and Spanish language ads

Silent as to most metrics. Purported to 

Reach 750,000 individuals in 6 affected 

counties with Facebook, GDN, and News 

sites

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 55

of 62
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BAKER 

&

HOSTE TL E R L LP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

 

EXHIBIT E 

TARGET MEDIA OUTLETS 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 56

of 62
List of Target Media Outlets: 

Local/CaliforniaLOCAL & CALIFORNIA MEDIA

TV

Chico-Redding KRCR-TV 7 (ABC)

Chico-Redding KHSL-TV 12 (CBS)

Chico-Redding KHSL-DT2 12.2 (CW)

Chico-Redding KCVU 20 (FOX)

Chico-Redding KNVN 24 (NBC)

SF KTVU (FOX)

SF KPIX-TV (CBS)

SF KGO-TV (ABC)

SF KTNC-TV

SF KNTV (NBC)

SF KDTV-DT (Univision)

LA KCBS-TV 

LA KCBS-TV 

LA KCBS-TV 

LA KCBS-TV 

LA KNBC

LA KABC-TV

LA KTLA (CW)

LA KMEX-DT

LA KTTV

RADIO

Chico-Redding The Morning News (KPAY-AM)

Chico-Redding KZFR-FM

Chico-Redding KMYC-AM

Chico-Redding KESR-FM

Chico-Redding KVXX-FM

SF KQED (NPR- 88.5FM)

SF KGO (810 AM)

SF KFRC-FM 106.9 FM

SF KBCS 740 AM

Sacramento KFBK 1530 AM

Sacramento KTKZ 1380 AM

Sacramento KYMX 96.1 FM

LA KFI 640 AM

LA KNX 1070 AM

LA KPFK 90.7 FM 

NEWSPAPER

Chico-Redding Record Searchlight

Chico-Redding Chico Enterprise-Record

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 57

of 62
Chico-Redding Daily News

Napa Napa Valley Register

Oakland Oakland Tribune

LA Los Angeles Times

LA Investor's Business Daily

SF/NorCal San Francisco Business Times

San Francisco Chronicle

San Francisco Examiner

San Fransisco Weekly

San Francisco Daily

San Francisco Herland

San Francisco Call 

East Bay Times

San Francisco Daily Journal

Westside Reporter

Fresno Fresno Bee

The Press-Enterprise 

MAGAZINE

LA Los Angeles Magazine

Los Angeles Magazine

Los Angeles Magazine

LALA Magazine

Los Angeles Business Journal

Los Angeles Business Journal

Daily Commerce

LA Area Chamber Voice

LA Area Chamber Voice

Metropolitan News-Enterprise

San Francisco Business Times

San Francisco Business Times

Oakland Independent Review

DIGITAL

LA LAObserved

LA Cultural Weekly

Oakland Oakland Local

Oakland Oakland North

Oakland Oakland Rising

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 58

of 62
NATIONAL OUTLETS

TV

CNN

MSNBC

Fox News

BBC World News

CNBC

Fox Business Network

RADIO

NPR

BBC World Service

NEWSPAPER

NYT

Washington Post

Wall Street Journal

USA Today

Newsday

Daily News

Chicago Tribune

MAGAZINE

TIME Magazine

The New Yorker

US Weekly

The Economist

The Atlantic

Fortune

DIGITAL

Business Insider

HuffPost

NowThis

Vice

Vox

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 59

of 62
SCHEDULE 1

Party Relationship Case Caption Exhibit Category

Bank of America Angeion Depositor Bank Accounts 

CitiBank NA Angeion Depositor Bank Accounts 

Wells Fargo Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Caprarola v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Bank Accounts 

TD Bank NA Angeion Depositor and Settlement 

Administrator on matter involving party

Puglisi et al v. TD Bank; Searcy v. TD 

Bank, N.A.

Term and Revolving Lenders

Ford Motor Credit Notice Administrator on matter involving 

party

In Re: Ford Tailgate Litigation Affiliations of Former 

Directors

Aetna Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Beckett et.al v. Aetna Inc, Aetna Life et 

al

Insurance

Chrysler Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

In RE: Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Eco-diesel 

marketing, sales practices, and products 

liability litigation

Landlords 

AIG Angeion insurer Litigation Counter-parties

Chubb Angeion insurer Litigation Counter-parties

Geico Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

A & M Gerber Chiropractic LLC at al v. 

Geico General Insurance Company

Litigation Counter-parties

Hartford Angeion Insurer and Settlement 

Administrator on matter involving party

Drummond v. Hartford Insurance 

Company

Litigation Counter-parties

Progressive Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Slade v. Progressive Security Insurance

Company 

Litigation Counter-parties

State Farm Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Vogt v. State Farm Life Insurance 

Company

Litigation Counter-parties

Travelers Angeion insurer Litigation Counter-parties

DLA Piper Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

Rodriguez v. Calvin Kline Inc. Ad Hoc Committee 

Latham & Watkins 

LLP

Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

Body Recovery Clinic LLC v. Concentra 

Inc. et. Al; Bishop v. Behr Process Corp; 

Non-Debtors

McDermott, Will & 

Emery LLP

Settlement Administrator on matter where 

they represented a party to settlement 

Remington Firearms Class Action 

Settlement

Non-Debtors

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 60

of 62
SCHEDULE 1

Cooley Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

In re: Honest Marketing Litigation; 

Haghayeghi v. Guess?, Inc. Settlement

Ordinary Professionals

Greenberg Traurig

LLP

Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

Scolaro v. RightSourcing Inc. Ordinary Professionals 

Jackson Lewis Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

Santos et. Al. v. Eric Goode, Sean 

Macpherson and Chelsea Park LLC. 

Ordinary Professionals 

Littler Mendelson Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

Maddy et al. v. General Electric 

Company, a New York corporation; 

Ordinary Professionals 

Norton Rose Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

Koller v. Deoleo USA, Inc. Ordinary Professionals 

Manatt Phelps Settlement Administrator on matter where 

they represented a party to settlement 

THUNDER STUDIOS, INC., et al. v. BOBCO 

METALS, LLC

Ordinary Professionals

Paul Hastings Settlement Administrator on matter where 

they represented a party to settlement 

Fuentes, et al. v. UniRush, LLC et al. Ordinary Professionals

Sidley Austin Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

Remijas, Frank, Farnoush and Kao v. The 

Neiman Marcus Group, LLC.

Ordinary Professionals 

Troutman Sanders Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

Barron v. Snyder's-Lance Inc. Ordinary Professionals 

Winston & Strawn Settlement Administrator on several matters 

where they represented a party to 

settlement 

In re: LG Front-Loading Washing 

Machine Class Action Litigation

Ordinary Professionals 

California Air 

Resources Board

Settlement Administrator on matter where 

party is involved

In RE: Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Eco-diesel 

marketing, sales practices, and products 

liability litigation

Regulatory & Govt

EPA Settlement Administrator on matter where 

party is involved

In RE: Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Eco-diesel 

marketing, sales practices, and products 

liability litigation

Regulatory & Govt

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 61

of 62
SCHEDULE 1

US Securities and 

Exchange 

Commission

Settlement Administrator on Security 

settlements where party is involved

China Biotics Securities Settlement; 

Fitbit Securities Litigation 

Regulatory & Govt

Canon Solutions 

America 

Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

In re Canon Ink Jet Printer Litigation UCC Lien Holders

Republic Services Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Serrano v. Republic Services Utility Provider

Verizon Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Kelly v. Verizon Utility Provider

Rubio-Delgado v. Aerotek, Inc. Vendor

Baker Hughes Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Ciamillo, et al. v. Baker Hughes 

Incorporated

Vendor

Johnson Controls Inc Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Dickerson, et al. v. York International 

Corporation, et al.

Vendor

Scientific Drilling 

International, Inc

Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Gentry & Smith v. Scientific Drilling, Int’l, 

Inc.; Sizemore, et. al. v. Scientific Drilling 

International, Inc.

Vendor

Sunbelt Rentals Inc. Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

All-South Subcontractors, Inc., et al. v 

Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

Vendor

Terminix Co Intl LP 

Commercial Division

Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Tomorrow Black-Brown, et. al. v. 

Terminix International Company Limited 

Partnership

Vendor

United Rentals Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party

Climate Masters Heating & Cooling LLC 

v. United Rentals (North America) and

United Rentals Inc. 

Vendor

Aerotek Settlement Administrator on matter 

involving party 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2306-1 Filed: 05/31/19 Entered: 05/31/19 13:27:55 Page 62

of 62