alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7027]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “The Original Copy: Photography of Sculpture, 1839 to Today,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, from on or about August 1, 2010, until on or about November 1, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: May 17, 2010.

Maura M. Pally,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-12445 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<PAGE>

NS GROUP, INC.            March 31, 2003      Form 10-Q             EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of NS Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rene J. Robichaud,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company. of the Company.

May 12, 2003                                  /s/ Rene J. Robichaud
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Rene J. Robichaud
                                              Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Footstar, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-20731, No. 333-30011 and No. 333-41390) on Form S-8 of Footstar, Inc. of our
report dated August 27, 2004, with respect to the Consolidated Balance Sheets of
Footstar, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies as of December 28, 2002 and December 29,
2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 28, 2002 and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the December 28, 2002 Annual Report on Form
10-K.

Our report dated August 27, 2004, contains explanatory paragraphs that state
that:

     o    the consolidated balance sheet as of December 29, 2001 and the related
          consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
          comprehensive income and cash flows for the years ended December 29,
          2001 and December 30, 2000, have been restated;

     o    the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
          Accounting Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in
          fiscal 2002; and

     o    On March 2, 2004, the Company filed voluntary petitions for
          reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This
          filing for reorganization raises substantial doubt about the Company's
          ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
          not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
          uncertainty.



KPMG LLP

New York, New York
September 2, 2004














                                     -109-
<PAGE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 21
- 00251
- CV In the Matter of the Marriage of Clifford Allen Stallworth and Kim Elizabeth Stallworth On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20
- 05
- 85765
- A
JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee
. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 2, 2023
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

s1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145394 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145394

COA: 307181

Wayne CC: 06

- 001860

- FC

WESLEY NEAL JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion to remand is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of AdvanSource Biomaterials Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael F. Adams, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael F. AdamsMichael F. AdamsChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: July 1, 2010







This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT B 10

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1662-11 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 17:03:55 Page 1

of 29
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officers of Sunovia Energy Technologies, Inc. (the Company) does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:  (a)           The annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2008 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and  (b)           Information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated:  November 10, 2008  /s/ Carl Smith Carl Smith, Chief Executive Officer  /s/ Matthew Veal Matthew Veal, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Secretary
#### Edward F. Lathrop and another, Appellants, v. Jonas J. Blake and others, Respondents.

Order granting new trial affirmed, with costs to abiue the event, on the opinion by

Lewis, J., at circuit.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VERINA VILLALON-ANCHONDO,

Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee, In Trust on

behalf of J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2337

[July 9, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Scott R. Kerner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CA-005921-

XXXX-MB.

Mark L. Pomeranz of Pomeranz & Associates, P.A., Hallandale, for 

appellant.

Allison Morat of Bitman O’Brien & Morat, PLLC, Lake Mary, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.1

CIKLIN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1 We are mindful of the issuance of Executive Order 20-159 (extending, until 12:01 a.m. 

on August 1, 2020, Executive Order 20-94, which suspends and tolls any statute 

providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law). We trust any 

motions directed to this order shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our 

mandate.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 7, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1845 Lower Tribunal No. 21-21266

________________ 

### Maria Colmenares Pacheco ,

Appellant,

vs. 

### Aleksander Samardjich ,

Appellee.

An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice Butchko, Judge. Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Kansas R. Gooden, and Kevin D. Franz (Boca Raton), for appellant. Kaplan Law Group, P.A., Christina J. Hudson, and Michael D. Kaplan (Hollywood), for appellee.
Before LOGUE, MILLER, and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Hague Convention, art. 1, 20 U.S.T. 361 (1969) (“This Convention shall not apply where the address of the person to be served with the document is not known.”); Delancy v. Tobias, 26 So. 3d 77, 79–80 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (finding plaintiff demonstrated requisite diligence in attempting to locate defendant where affidavit of diligent search delineated substantial “honest and conscientious” efforts to locate defendant); Fernandez v. Chamberlain, 201 So. 2d 781, 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967) (“[W]hen a . . . resident [motor vehicle] owner . . . who subsequently becomes a non-resident[,] . . . accepts the privilege of the public highways of the state and is involved in an accident, he [or she] has a duty not to conceal his [or her] whereabouts and to let his [or her] whereabouts be known so that any one [sic] involved in such accident and sustaining injury or damage may come into court and seek redress. If such an owner . . . conceals his [or her] whereabouts and makes it impossible for an aggrieved party to serve him [or her] with notice by registered mail as provided by the statute and such aggrieved party shows that he has used due diligence in endeavoring to make service, this will not prevent the [c]ourt from obtaining jurisdiction over such owner . . . .”).
Exhibit 21.1


SUBSIDIARIES OF FOOTSTAR, INC.
  The registrant owns all the outstanding equity interests of Footstar Corporation, a Texas corporation, and Footstar Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Footstar Corporation owns all of the outstanding membership interests of Footstar HQ, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company and all of the outstanding equity interests of FCB I Holdings, Inc, a Delaware corporation. FCB I Holdings, Inc. owns all of the outstanding equity interests of FCB I Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation. FCB I Acquisition Corp. owns all the outstanding membership interests of FCB I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.  On January 3, 2011, a stockholder acquired a 19.5% interest in FCB I Holdings, Inc.
  All of the subsidiaries referred to herein are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the registrant.
  The names of other subsidiaries are omitted as, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 CASE NO. 19-30088 

Gerald P. Kennedy (Bar No. 105887)

E-mail:gerald.kennedy@procopio.com 

PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & 

SAVITCH LLP 

525 B Street, Suite 2200 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: 619.238.1900 

Facsimile: 619.235.0398 

Attorney for Creditor Agile Sourcing Partners, Inc. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

Debtor 

Case No. 19-30088 

Chapter 11 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND 

REQUEST FOR NOTICE AND 

SERVICE OF PAPERS 

TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, THE DEBTOR 

AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD, AND TO ALL OTHER PARTIES IN INTEREST: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Creditor AGILE SOURCING PARTNERS, INC., by its 

attorneys, PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP, appears in this matter 

pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 2002 and 9010, and Sections 102(1), 342 and 1109 (b) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, and requests that copies of all notices and pleadings given, filed, or required to 

be given in this case, and all papers served or required to be served in this case, be given to and 

served upon the following: 

Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP 

525 B Street, Suite 2200 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: (619) 238-1900 

Facsimile: (619) 235-0398 

Email: gerald.kennedy@procopio.com

Attn: Gerald P. Kennedy, Esq. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 179 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:59:32 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DOCS 127346-000001/3549127.1 CASE NO. 19-30088 2 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy 

Code, the foregoing demand includes not only the notices and papers referred to in the Rules 

specified above, but also includes, without limitation, orders and notices of any application, 

motions, petitions, pleadings, requests, complaints, demands, disclosure statements, plans of 

reorganization, and answering or reply papers whether transmitted or conveyed by mail, delivery, 

telephone, telegraph, telex or otherwise. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that neither this notice nor any later appearance, 

pleading, claim, or suit shall waive any right (1) to have final orders in non-core matters entered 

only after de novo review by a District Judge, (2) to trial by jury in any proceeding so triable in this 

case or any case, controversy, or proceeding related to this case, (3) to have the District Court 

withdraw the reference in any matter subject to recoupments to which the Landlord is or may be 

entitled under agreements, in law or in equity, all of which rights, claims, actions, defenses, setoffs 

and recoupments are expressly reserved. 

DATED: January 31, 2019 PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES &

SAVITCH LLP 

 By: /s/ Gerald P. Kennedy

 Gerald P. Kennedy 

Attorney for Creditor 

Agile Sourcing Partners, Inc. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 179 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 09:59:32 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 21  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES  WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF KNOLL, INC.
  
  JURISDICTION
  OF
  INCORPORATIONKnoll
  North America Corp
  
  Ontario, CanadaSpinneybeck
  Enterprises, Inc.
  
  New YorkSpinneybeck,
  LTD. (wholly owned subsidiary of Spinneybeck Enterprises, Inc.)
  
  Ontario, CanadaSpinneybeck
  Ireland (wholly owned subsidiary of Spinneybeck Enterprises, Inc.)
  
  IrelandEdelman
  Leather, LLC
  
  DelawareEdelman
  Leather Limited (wholly owned subsidiary of Edelman Leather, LLC)
  
  IrelandKnoll
  Overseas, Inc.
  
  DelawareKnoll
  Middle East, LLC (wholly owned subsidiary of Knoll Overseas, Inc.)
  
  DelawareKnoll
  Muebles y Sistemas S.A. (wholly owned subsidiary of Knoll
  Overseas, Inc.)
  
  ColumbiaKnoll
  Europe B.V. (wholly owned subsidiary of Knoll Overseas, Inc.)
  
  NetherlandsKnoll
  Italy, Ltd. (wholly owned subsidiary of Knoll Europe B.V.)
  
  England &
  WalesKnoll
  International S.p.A. (75% owned subsidiary of Knoll Europe B.V. and 25% owned
  subsidiary of Knoll Italy, Ltd.)
  
  ItalyKnoll
  International, Ltd. (wholly owned subsidiary of Knoll Europe B.V.)
  
  England &
  WalesKnoll
  International S.A. (wholly owned subsidiary of Knoll Europe B.V.)
  
  FranceKnoll International Deutschland GmBH (wholly owned subsidiary of Knoll Europe B.V.)
  
  GermanyKnoll
  International Belgium S.A. (wholly owned subsidiary of Knoll Europe B.V.)
  
  Belgium
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 1 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1716 Filed: 04/26/19 Entered: 04/26/19 15:16:27 Page 9 of

9
Order entered October 30, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-17-00763-CV RAKIYA ENGO DIALLO, Appellant
V. CITY OF GARLAND AND GARLAND INDE PENDANT SCHOOL D ISTRICT, Appell ees On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. TX-16-01766 

### ORDER On October 4, 2017, we ordered the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record as appellant had failed to comply with our directive to provide wr itten verification she had requested the record and paid the fee or was entitled to procee d without payment of costs. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). Before the Court now is a copy of appellant’s October 24, 2017 written request to the reporter for the record. We construe the filing of the copy of the request as a motion to vacate our October 4 th order. We GRANT the motion. We VACATE the October 4 th
order and ORDER appellant to file, no later than November 6, 2017, written veri fication she has paid the reporter’s fee or is entitled to proceed without payme nt. We caution appellant that failure to timely comply may result in the appeal again being s ubmitted without the reporter’s record. See id.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the part ies and court reporters Sheretta L. M artin and Heidi J. Darst.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
#### JOHN GIESE, Respondent, *v.*BENJAMIN J. HALL, Appellant.

*Negligence*— liability *of a master to an employee for inyu/ry sustained by reason of the negligence of a*co-employee— *amount qf damage.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried.

*441The court at General Term said: “ Tbe defendant was employed by an owner of a steamship to unload his cargo of sugar upon lighters. The plaintiff was a deck hand on the lighter J uly lying alongside of the steamship and receiving, a portion of her cargo. The defendant’s men raised from the hold of the vessel the bags of ■sugar, and then attached the bags as they came out of the ship’s hold and lay upon the deck to the hoisting apparatus of the lighter, and then they were lowered to the lighter by the lighter’s men at the direction of the defendant. .There was proof given tending to show that the sling was not jammed tight to the bag, but was left ■so loose that the bag of sugar escaped and fell, injuring the plaintiff. The case is very similar to the case of *Tyncm*v. *Pierrepont,*recently decided by this court. It was held that an improper packing of the bag in the sling was evidence of negligence to go to the jury. If the defendant’s duty was to put the sugar on the lighter, and the lighter men acted under his signal, the duty of the packing and the sufficiency of it to continue till the sugar reached the deck of the lighter seems plain. To whom else could the lighter’s men look for ■that carefulness which gives safety when neglect is liable to end in •death or severe injury. The damages are not excessive under the rule governing that question on appeal. The plaintiff’s hip was •dislocated and he suffered severe pain; was in hospital three weeks •and unable to walk for four months. He is still compelled to lay .■all night in one position. The motions of the hip joint are limited. The jury have given $2,750. There is nothing like passion or .prejudice in this amount and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.”

*William (J. JDe Witt,*for the appellant.

*Stephen B.*Jacobs, for the respondent.

Opinion by

BabNaed, P. J.;

Dyeman, J., concurred.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.