28302 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W–70,949M: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Mansfield, MA. 

TA–W–70,949N: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Plymouth, 

MN. 

TA–W–70,949O: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Streetsboro, OH. 

TA–W–70,949P: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Orlando, 

FL. 

TA–W–70,949Q: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Milwaukee, WI. 

TA–W–70,949R: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Warren, 

MI. 

TA–W–70,949S: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Marysville, MI. 

TA–W–70,949: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Center 

Line, MI. 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W–71,562: Magneti Marelli 

Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford, NC. 

TA–W–71,734A: Morris Yachts, Inc., 

Trenton, ME. 

TA–W–71,734: Morris Yachts, Inc., Bass 

Harbor, ME. 

TA–W–73,287: HP Enterprise Services, 

Formerly Known As EDS/HP, Fort 

Worth, TX. 

TA–W–73,304: Suntron Corporation, 

Newberg, OR. 

TA–W–73,337: Vector CANtech, Novi, 

MI. 

TA–W–73,340: Carestream Health, Inc., 

Sensitizing Department, Windsor, 

CO. 

TA–W–73,387: CC Forbes, Big Lake, TX. 

TA–W–73,442: International Business 

Machines Corporation, IT Support 

7—IBM, Boulder, CO. 

TA–W–73,452: Safmarine, Inc., 

Madison, NJ. 

TA–W–73,474: Managed Business 

Solutions, Santa Rosa, CA. 

TA–W–73,571: Halliburton, Duncan, 

OK. 

TA–W–73,744: Sony Ericsson, USA, 

Research Triangle Park, NC. 

TA–W–73,834: William B. Altman, Inc., 

Fenelton, PA. 

TA–W–73,839: Duthler Ford Truck, Inc., 

Wyoming, MI. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

in cases where these petitions were not 

filed in accordance with the 

requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every 

petition filed by workers must be signed 

by at least three individuals of the 

petitioning worker group. Petitioners 

separated more than one year prior to 

the date of the petition cannot be 

covered under a certification of a 

petition under Section 223(b), and 

therefore, may not be part of a 

petitioning worker group. For one or 

more of these reasons, these petitions 

were deemed invalid. 

TA–W–72,895: Clark Construction, El 

Dorado, TX. 

TA–W–73,300: Wood-Mode, Kreamer, 

PA. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioning groups of 

workers are covered by active 

certifications. Consequently, further 

investigation in these cases would serve 

no purpose since the petitioning group 

of workers cannot be covered by more 

than one certification at a time. 

TA–W–71,317: Product Action, Toledo, 

OH. 

TA–W–73,749: Assembly and Test 

Worldwide, Inc., Shelton, CT. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of April 12, 2010 through April 23, 2010. 

Copies of these determinations may be 

requested under the Freedom of Information 

Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, 

courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure 

Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov. These 

determinations also are available on the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: May 13, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12110 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–72,606] 

American Food and Vending Spring 

Hill, TN; Notice of Negative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated April 6, 2010, 

the International Union, United 

Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural 

Implements Workers of America, Local 

1853 (Union) requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department’s 

negative determination regarding 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was signed on March 

19, 2010. The Department’s Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on April 23, 2010 (75 

FR 21358). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of 

the law justified reconsideration of the 

decision. 

The negative determination 

applicable to workers and former 

workers at American Food and Vending, 

Spring Hill, Tennessee, was based on 

the findings that the subject firm did 

not, during the investigation period, 

shift to a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with the cafeteria 

services or vending machine services 

supplied by the workers or acquire from 

a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with the cafeteria 

services or vending machine services 

supplied by the workers; that the 

workers’ separation, or threat of 

separation, was not related to any 

increase in imports of like or directly 

competitive services or a shift in 

service/acquisition abroad; and that the 

workers did not supply a service that 

was directly used in the production of 

an article or the supply of service by a 

firm that employed a worker group that 

is eligible to apply for TAA based on the 

afore-mentioned article or service. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

Union stated that the workers of the 

subject firm should be eligible for TAA 

because they are service workers who 

provided services to General Motors, 

Spring Hill, Tennessee, and were laid 

off at the same time as workers of 

Premier Manufacturing Support 

Services (a services provider to General 

Motors, Spring Hill, Tennessee, who 

were certified eligible to apply for TAA 

on March 12, 2010, under TA–W– 

72,379). 

The difference in the determinations 

is based on the difference in the 

companies’ relationships to the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Notices 28303 

production process at General Motors, 

Spring Hill, Tennessee. The workers of 

Premier Manufacturing Support 

Services provided services (janitorial, 

maintenance, and hazardous waste 

disposal) that were directly involved in 

the production process at General 

Motors, Spring Hill, Tennessee. In 

contrast, the worker of the subject firm 

provided services (cafeteria services and 

vending machine services) that are not 

directly involved in the production 

process at General Motors, Spring Hill, 

Tennessee. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

Union also asserts that the workers ‘‘are 

under the operational control of the 

General Motors Corporation in Spring 

Hill, Tennessee and were considered 

joint employees.’’ 

A careful review of previouslysubmitted information from American 

Food and Vending revealed no evidence 

that supports either of the aforementioned assertions. For example, the 

workers’ wages have not been reported 

under any Federal Employer 

Identification Number (FEIN) other than 

the subject firm’s FEIN. 

The petitioner did not supply facts 

not previously considered; nor provide 

additional documentation indicating 

that there was either (1) a mistake in the 

determination of facts not previously 

considered or (2) a misinterpretation of 

facts or of the law justifying 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. 

After careful review of the request for 

reconsideration, the Department 

determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not 

been met. 

Conclusion 

After review of the application and 

investigative findings, I conclude that 

there has been no error or 

misinterpretation of the law or of the 

facts which would justify 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the 

application is denied. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

May 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12107 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–71,401] 

Setco Automotive, Inc., Paris, TN; 

Notice of Revised Determination on 

Reconsideration 

By application dated April 5, 2010, 

the Tennessee AFL–CIO Technical 

Assistance Office (Union) requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

negative determination regarding 

workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of the subject firm. 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination, issued on 

March 9, 2010, that was based on the 

finding that there was no increase in 

imports by the workers’ firm or 

customers of the subject firm, nor was 

there a shift or acquisition by the 

workers’ firm, and neither the workers’ 

firm nor its customers reported imports 

of articles like or directly competitive 

with articles into which the automotive 

clutch products produced by the 

workers’ firm was directly incorporated 

into. The Department’s Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on April 23, 2010 (FR 

75 21358). 

The reconsideration investigation 

revealed that, during 2008 and 2009, the 

subject firm sold component parts 

(automotive clutch products) to be 

incorporated into an article to a firm 

that employed a worker group currently 

eligible to apply for TAA, and that the 

article was the basis for the certification. 

The subject firm’s sales to that customer 

in each of those two years amounted to 

approximately twenty percent of the 

subject firm’s total sales. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the additional 

facts obtained on reconsideration, I 

determine that workers of Setco 

Automotive, Inc., Paris, Tennessee meet 

the worker group certification criteria 

under Section 222(c) of the Act, 19 

U.S.C. 2272(c). In accordance with 

Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273, 

I make the following certification: 

All workers of Setco Automotive, Inc., 

Paris, Tennessee, who became totally or 

partially separated from employment on or 

after June 25, 2008, through two years from 

the date of this certification, and all workers 

in the group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on date of 

certification through two years from the date 

of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of 

May, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12115 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Federal Register Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, [NRC–2010– 

0002]. 

DATE: Week of May 24, 2010. 

PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference 

Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. 

STATUS: Public and Closed. 

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Week of May 24, 2010 

Thursday, May 27, 2010 

9:25 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public 

Meeting) (Tentative). 

a. South Texas Project Nuclear 

Operating Co. (South Texas Project 

Units 3 and 4), Intervenors’ Notice 

of Appeal, Brief in Support of 

Intervenors’ Appeal of Atomic 

Safety and Licensing Board’s Order 

of January 29, 2010 (Feb. 9, 2010) 

(Tentative). 

This meeting will be Webcast live at 

the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov. 

* * * * * 

The NRC Commission Meeting 

Schedule can be found on the Internet 

at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policymaking/schedule.html. 

* * * * * 

The NRC provides reasonable 

accommodation to individuals with 

disabilities where appropriate. If you 

need a reasonable accommodation to 

participate in these public meetings, or 

need this meeting notice or the 

transcript or other information from the 

public meetings in another format (e.g., 

braille, large print), please notify Angela 

Bolduc, Chief, Employee/Labor 

Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301– 

492–2230, TDD: 301–415–2100, or by email at angela.bolduc@nrc.gov. 

Determinations on requests for 

reasonable accommodation will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

* * * * * 

This notice is distributed 

electronically to subscribers. If you no 

longer wish to receive it, or would like 

to be added to the distribution, please 

contact the Office of the Secretary, 

Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969), 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1