alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 21.1
                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                            JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------                                   OR ORGANIZATION              DOING BUSINESS AS
                                             ---------------              -----------------
<S>                                   <C>                                 <C>
Fortress Mortgage, Inc.                           Delaware                Fortress Mortgage

Brookstone Homes, Inc.                            Delaware                Brookstone Homes

Fortress-Florida, Inc.                            Delaware                Fortress Homes and
                                                                          Communities of Florida

Fortress Tysons, LLC                              Delaware                Westbrook Homes

Fortress Holding - Virginia, Inc.                 Delaware
    Sunstar Enterprises, LLC                      Delaware
         Landmark Homes, Inc.                     North Carolina          Sunstar Homes
         Legacy Homes, Inc.                       North Carolina

    Christopher Homes, LLC                        Nevada                  Christopher Homes

    Fortress Pennsylvania, LLC                    Delaware                Iacobucci Homes

    Galloway Enterprises, LLC                     Delaware
         Don Galloway Homes, LLC                  Delaware                Don Galloway Homes
         Thornblade, LLC                          North Carolina
         Don Galloway Land, LLC                   North Carolina

   Whittaker Construction, LLC                    Delaware                Whittaker Homes
   Whittaker Custom Homes, LLC                    Delaware
   RRKTG Lumber, LLC                              Delaware                RRKTG Lumber
   Lewis and Clark Title Company                  Missouri                Lewis and Clark Title

   Quail Construction, LLC                        Washington              Quail Construction
   Camden Crossing, LLC                           Washington
   Quail Real Estate, LLC                         Washington              Quail Realty

   The Genesee Company, LLC                       Colorado                The Genesee Company
   Genesee Venture, LLC                           Colorado
   Genesee Communities II, LLC                    Colorado
   Genesee Communities IV, LLC                    Colorado
   Genesee Communities V, LLC                     Colorado
   Genesee Communities VI, LLC                    Colorado
   Genesee Communities VII, LLC                   Colorado
   Genesee Communities VIII, LLC                  Colorado

   Wilshire Homes, Ltd.                           Texas                   Wilshire Homes
   Fortress Management, Inc.                      Texas
   Wilshire Homes San Antonio, Ltd.               Texas
   Cullen Avenue, Ltd.                            Texas
   The Park at Los Indios, Ltd.                   Texas
</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3228

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Stacey Ladon Brown, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 23, 2009 Filed: December 30, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Stacey Ladon Brown appeals the 155-month sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to knowingly possessing with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1 ) and 841(b)(1)(A)(iii). Brown’s sentence was based in part on a dow nward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. Brown’s counsel seeks permission to withdraw and has f iled a brief under Ande rs v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has filed a pro se s upplemental brief arguing that the district-2- court erred in sentencing him as a career offender under the Guidelines, and that his attorney was ineffective and coerced hi s guilty plea. He has also moved to supplement the record.

We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Brown to 155 months in prison. See United States v. Berni , 439 F.3d 990, 993 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (appellate court revi ews sentences involving § 5K1.1 downward departure for reasonableness using abuse of discretion standard; sentence is reasonable where district court correctly calculated Guidelines range, permissibly applied § 5K1.1 departure, and consid ered resulting adjusted rangeand § 3553(a) factors). We also conclude the court correctly determined that Brown was a career offender under the advisory Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 (career-offender elements); United States v. Adams , 509 F.3d 929, 932-33 (8th Cir. 2007) (robberies that occurred at different locations, different times, and w ith different victims, although similar in modus operandi, were separate offenses for purposes of determining § 4B1.1 career offender status). Finally, we decline to re view Brown’s claims that his counsel was ineffective and coerced his guilty plea. SeeUnited States v. McAdory , 501 F.3d 868, 872-73 (8th Cir. 2007) (appellate court ordinarily defers ineffective-assistance claims to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings); United States v. Cain , 134 F.3d 1345, 1352 (8th Cir. 1998) (claim that ineffective a ssistance of counsel rendered guilty plea involuntary is more properly raised in § 2255 proceedings).
Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm. We also grant Brown’s motion to supplement the record.

______________________________
#### George F. Considine v. Hudson Trust Company.

Motion granted. Order to he settled on notice.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

                  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of INTERMET Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert E. Belts
-------------------
Robert E. Belts
May 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 99


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                        --------------------------------


I, Gerald Zarin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of
NUWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  April 14, 2003

                                          /s/ Gerald Zarin
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Gerald Zarin
                                          Chairman, President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Jeremiah F. O'Brien, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NUWAVE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(3)      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(4)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  April 14, 2003

                                      /s/ Jeremiah F. O'Brien
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Jeremiah F. O'Brien
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.01
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
    Date: March 14, 2006
    /s/ John C. GoffJohn C. GoffChief Executive Officer




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
    Date: March 14, 2006
    /s/ Jerry R. Crenshaw, Jr.Jerry R. Crenshaw, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11892]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-10-015]


Government In The Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: May 21, 2010 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1047. (Review) (Ironing Tables and Certain Parts 
Thereof from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to 
the Secretary of Commerce on or before June 4, 2010.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 13, 2010.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2010-11892 Filed 5-13-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# William H. Crawford: A Featured Biography

**

----

A well-known and respected politician of the early nineteenth century who was twice considered for president of the United States, William H. Crawford (1772-1834) of Georgia served in the Senate from 1807 to 1813. Crawford gained national recognition for his opposition to President Thomas Jefferson’s embargo against Great Britain and France in 1807 and for his support for a rechartered First Bank in 1811. Despite being on the losing side of both of those debates, Crawford’s principled positions and eloquent arguments led to his election as the Senate’s president pro tempore in 1812. Reluctant in his support for the War of 1812, Crawford at first declined President James Madison’s offer to serve as secretary of war, choosing instead appointment as America’s minister to France in 1813. In 1815 he accepted the nomination as secretary of war and also served as secretary of treasury under Presidents Madison and Monroe. Crawford returned to Georgia in 1827, spending his final years as a circuit court judge.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
EXHIBIT 10.23

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is executed as of the 19th day of September 2001, by and between KEVIN ELLIOTT, an individual ("Employee"), EN
POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), with reference to the following facts:

A.  Employee
is an individual possessing unique management and executive talents of value to the Company.

B.  The
Company desires to engage Employee as the Senior Vice President of Sales of the Company, and Employee desires to accept such employment, all on the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

In consideration of the foregoing recitals and of the covenants and agreements herein, the parties agree as follows:



PAGE 1

---



PAGE 2

---



Fiscal Quarter

Top Line Revenue Must Exceed

Bonus1st Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002

$
106,000,000.00

$
21,250.002nd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002

$
104,000,000.00

$
21,250.003rd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002

$
112,000,000.00

$
21,250.004th Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002

$
117,000,000.00

$
21,250.00Totals

$
439,000,000.00

$
85,000.00






PAGE 3

---



Pay Date

Draw10/07/01

$
7,08411/07/01

$
7,08312/07/01

$
7,083Total Draw Paid:

$
21,250




Fiscal Quarter

Pre-Tax Net Income Must Exceed

Bonus1st Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002

$
650,000.00

$
21,250.002nd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002

$
750,000.00

$
21,250.003rd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002

$
1,100,000.00

$
21,250.004th Quarter of Fiscal Year 2002

$
1,250,000.00

$
21,250.00Totals

$
3,750,000.00

$
85,000.00




PAGE 4

---





PAGE 5

---







PAGE 6

---



PAGE 7

---



If to Employee:

Kevin ElliottIf to the Company:

En Pointe Technologies, Inc.
100 N. Sepulveda Blvd., 19th Floor
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attention: CEO




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands as of the day and year first above written.

|"EMPLOYEE"    |  | "COMPANY"                                                 
|------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|              |  |                                                           
|              |  | EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
|              |  | By:                                                       
|              |  |                                                           
|Kevin Elliott |  | Tom Scott, Chief Operating Officer                        
|              |  |                                                           
|              |  |                                                           
|              |  |                                                           

PAGE 8

---

QuickLinks
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 23, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00042-CV IN THE INTEREST OF D.P.B. AND D.Z.B ., MINOR CHILDREN On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-52923-2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns and Ju stices Pedersen, III, and Kennedy Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this case is over due. By postcard da ted May 8, 2023 we informed appellant her brief wa s overdue and directed her to file her brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief or otherwise corresponded with th e Court regarding the status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

230042F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF D.P.B. AND D.Z.B., MINOR CHILDREN
No. 05-23-00042-CV On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-52923- 2021. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Pedersen, III and Kennedy participating. In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered June 23, 2023
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with this  annual  report on Form 10-K of Netsmart Technologies,
Inc.,  for the period  ended December 31, 2004, I James L. Conway,  Chief
Executive Officer of Netsmart  Technologies,  Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. the information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.

Date:  March 17, 2005

By:  /s/ James L. Conway
     --------------------
     James L. Conway

     Chief Executive Officer


In  connection  with this  annual  report on Form 10-K of Netsmart Technologies,
Inc.  for the period  ended December 31, 2004, I, Anthony F. Grisanti,  Chief
Financial  Officer of Netsmart  Technologies,  Inc.,  hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. the information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.

Date:  March 17, 2005

By:  /s/Anthony F. Grisanti
     -----------------------
     Anthony F. Grisanti

     Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Netsmart Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Netsmart
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Elizabeth Sulinski v. Joseph Sulinski.

Motion granted.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4774 

To require accountability in the Veterans Health Administration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 29, 2014 

Mr. STOCKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require accountability in the Veterans Health 

Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Health Ac5 countability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that in light of the Veterans Health 

8 Administration’s continued delays in providing emergency 

9 and other serious health care to the Nation’s veterans, 

10 there needs to be more accountability to prevent this situa11 tion from occurring in the future. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4774 IH

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

2 ‘‘Timely basis’’ shall be one day for procedures and 

3 seven calendar days for tests. 

4 SEC. 4. GENERAL AUTHORIZATION. 

5 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall provide a 

6 voucher, the value of which shall be the market price for 

7 the needed service, for use at non-Veterans’ Administra8 tion facilities for any veteran who has been denied 

9 healthcare on a timely basis at any Veterans’ Administra10 tion facility. 

11 If more than ten percent of the Veterans Health Ad12 ministration’s budget goes towards the health vouchers, 

13 then all veterans shall be eligible for Veterans’ Adminis14 tration-paid care from non-Veterans’ Administration fa15 cilities and the Secretary of the Veterans’ Administration 

16 shall immediately prepare for the privatization of all Vet17 erans’ Administration facilities to be completed within one 

18 calendar year. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands, etc., Required for the Opening of West One Hundred and Seventy-seventh Street, etc., from Amsterdam Avenue to St. Nicholas Avenue, etc., and from Broadway to Riverside Drive, etc., Borough of Manhattan, City of New York. Meyer A. Bernheimer, Appellant; Broadway Amsterdam Company and Nestor Holding Company, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on prevailing opinion on former appeal (135 App. Div. 520).

Ingraham, P. J., dissenting on dissenting opinion of Houghton, J., on former appeal.