alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12170 and #12171]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1912-DR), dated 05/11/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         05/01/2010 and continuing.. *Effective Date:*
                         05/11/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/12/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/11/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/11/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Allen, Hart, Lewis, Logan, Metcalfe, Monroe, Rockcastle. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 121706 and for economic injury is 121716. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-12083 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 23.5
   RegistrationStatementNumber
    
    Form
    
    Description333-05257
    
    Form S-8
    
    1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Agreement
entered into, effective January 4, 1995, by and between Sunrise Assisted Living, Inc, and David W.
Faeder333-38430
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan, as Amended333-26837
    
    Form S-8
    
    1997 Stock Option Plan333-57291
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, as Amended333-57293
    
    Form S-8
    
    1998 Stock Option Plan333-78313
    
    Form S-8
    
    1999 Stock Option Plan333-38432
    
    Form S-8
    
    2000 Stock Option Plan333-61918
    
    Form S-8
    
    2001 Stock Option Plan333-88570
    
    Form S-8
    
    2002 Stock Option Plan and Restricted Stock Plan333-61914
    
    Form S-8
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan333-109228
    
    Form S-8
    
    2003 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan333-120738
    
    Form S-8
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 4, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis**                     (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

*1. Hensley Family Limited Partnership, and its general partners, Jack L. Hensley and Connie D. Hensley*, all of Kalispell, Montana; to retain control of Valley Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain control of Valley Bank of Kalispell, both of Kalispell, Montana.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 17, 2010.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-12134 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          43,215                  29,452
<SECURITIES>                                    10,843                  26,139
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,570                  13,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,502                   2,145
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,286                  67,016
<PP&E>                                           6,329                   6,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,863                   3,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,750                  77,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,230                  11,344
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           138                     139
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,927                  65,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,750                  77,249
<SALES>                                          7,530                  18,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,530                  18,034
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,567                   5,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,249                   4,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    79                     771
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (97)                   1,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                        70                     404
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (167)                     734
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (167)                     734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)                    0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                    0.05


</TABLE>
First Amendment to Broderson Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.15 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO BRODERSEN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made by and between Eric Brodersen (the
“Executive”) and Impinj, Inc. (the “Company” and together with the Executive hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties”) on February 9, 2015. 

W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, the Parties previously entered into an employment agreement, dated April 1, 2014 (the “Prior
Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Prior Agreement to provide for 100%
acceleration in certain circumstances upon a change of control, among other things. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable
consideration, Executive and the Company agree to amend the Prior Agreement, as follows: 
 1. Section 5(b)(4) of the Prior Agreement
is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety as follows (with deletions struck through and insertions italicized and underlined): 

“(4) accelerated vesting of all outstanding Equity Awards as to fifty percent (50%) one hundred percent
(100%) of the then unvested portion of any such Equity Award, and” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has
executed this Amendment, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year set forth above. 
  

							
	COMPANY	 		 	IMPINJ, INC.
			
		 		 	 /s/ Chris Diorio

		 		 	By:	 	Chris Diorio, Ph.D.
		 		 	Title:	 	CEO
			
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	ERIC BRODERSEN
			
		 		 	 /s/ Eric Brodersen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. EARNINGS
PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN RESTATED TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SFAS
128, EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-03-1997
<CASH>                                           2,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,981
<INVENTORY>                                    389,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               488,914
<PP&E>                                       1,053,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                 255,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,421,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,789
<BONDS>                                        531,791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           631
<OTHER-SE>                                     471,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,421,559
<SALES>                                        868,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               868,245
<CGS>                                          621,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  851,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,340)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.55) <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55) <F2>
        
<FN>
<F1> Represents basic earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
earnings per share. 
<F2> Represents diluted earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, 
earnings per share.
</FN>

</TABLE>
CASE 3 — EOREEITED RECOGNIZANCE

— APRIL 10.

#### Commonwealth, (for Huker,) vs. Taphorn, &c.

APPEAL PROM THE KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

The circuit court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from a judgment of the county court upon a forfeited recognizance for the appearance of a defendant in a bastardy case. An appeal from such judgment is exclusively cognizable by the court of appeals.

A. J. James, Attorney General, for Commonwealth,

cited *Civil Code, secs.*15, 16,

CambroN and Fisic, on same side.

Carlisle, Hamilton and Carlisle, for appellees.

CHIEE JUSTICE DUVA1L

delivered the opinion op the oodkt:

Taphorn was accused by Theresa Huker of being the father of her bastard child. At the April term 1860, of the Kenton county court, he was put on trial, but the jury failing to agree, were discharged, and Taphorn, with the present ap-pellees as his sureties, entered into a recognizance in the sum of $300, “to be due upon the failure of said Clement Taphorn to appear at the next regular term of this court in Covington, to answer said charge.” Such is the recital contained in the order of court, .the recognizance bond not being in the record. At a subsequent term the recognizance was declared forfeited, and the sureties having been summoned, judgment was rendered against them for the $300. They appealed to the Kenton circuit court, and that court rendered a judgment quashing the summons which had issued by order of the county court, and dismissing the case at the cost of the plaintiff. To reverse that judgment she has appealed.

The only question to be decided is whether the Kenton circuit court had jurisdiction of the appeal from the judgment of the county court.

The law has given to this court appellate jurisdiction over the final orders and judgments of all other courts of this com*72monwealth, subject to certain exceptions. Among these exceptions is the class of cases in which the judgment or order is by the *county court,*and an appeal is given to the quarterly or *circuit court. (Code, sections*15, 16.)

The cases in which appellate jurisdiction is given to the *circuit courts*over the final orders and judgments of the *county courts,*are enumerated in *section*20. It will be seen at a glance that this enumeration does not embrace the present case, which is simply a personal judgment for money. An appeal from such judgment is therefore exclusively cognizable by this court.

It is obvious that the circuit court erred in assuming jurisdiction to render the judgment complained of, and it is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the appeal.
S. 2594

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to contract with the Mancos Water

Conservancy District to use the Mancos Project facilities for impounding, storage,

diverting, and carriage of nonproject water for the purpose of irrigation, domestic,

municipal, industrial, and any other beneficial purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARRIAGE OF NONPROJECT WATER BY THE MANCOS

PROJECT, COLORADO.

(a) SALE OF EXCESS WATER.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the Act of August 11,

1939 (commonly known as the ‘‘Water Conservation and Utilization Act’’) (16 U.S.C. 590y et seq.), if storage or carrying capacity

has been or may be provided in excess of the requirements

of the land to be irrigated under the Mancos Project, Colorado

(referred to in this Act as the ‘‘project’’), the Secretary of the

Interior may, on such terms as the Secretary determines to

be just and equitable, contract with the Mancos Water Conservancy District and any of its member unit contractors for

impounding, storage, diverting, or carriage of nonproject water

for irrigation, domestic, municipal, industrial, and any other

beneficial purposes, to an extent not exceeding the excess

capacity.

(2) INTERFERENCE.—A contract under paragraph (1) shall

not impair or otherwise interfere with any authorized purpose

of the project.

(3) COST CONSIDERATIONS.—In fixing the charges under

a contract under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall take into

consideration—

(A) the cost of construction and maintenance of the

project, by which the nonproject water is to be diverted,

impounded, stored, or carried; and

(B) the canal by which the water is to be carried.

(4) NO ADDITIONAL CHARGES.—The Mancos Water Conservancy District shall not impose a charge for the storage, carriage, or delivery of the nonproject water in excess of the

charge paid to the United States, except to such extent as

may be reasonably necessary to cover—

(A) a proportionate share of the project cost; and

(B) the cost of carriage and delivery of the nonproject

water through the facilities of the Mancos Water Conservancy District.
S. 2594—2

(b) WATER RIGHTS OF UNITED STATES NOT ENLARGED.—Nothing

in this Act enlarges or attempts to enlarge the right of the United

States, under existing law, to control any water in any State.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                                                        Exhibit 15


                              LETTER FROM KPMG LLP
               REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Alfa Corporation
Montgomery, Alabama

With respect to the Registration Statement on Form S-8, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated August 10, 2001, related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such reports are not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
August 10, 2001
#### Owen Smith, administrator, plaintiff in error, *vs.*William D. Howell *et al.,*defendants in error.

Where, in a suit pending on a promissory note dated before the 1st of June, 1865, it appeared that the suit was in the name of an administrator, that a widow and minor children were the sole distributees of the estate, and that the note had been taken by the administrator as part of the consideration of a tract of land sold by him belonging to the estate:

*129
      *Held,*That, *prima*facie, the note was due to the widow and minors, and within the exceptions to the Act of October 13, 1870, so that the tax affidavit was unnecessary.

Relief Act of 1870. Tax affidavit. Exceptions. Before Judge Sessions. Lowndes Superior Court. December Adjourned Term, 1871.

Owen Smith, as administrator upon the estate of á.aron Giddens, deceased, brought complaint against William R. Manning, as administrator upon the estate of William Ashley and William D. Howell as makers, and Leroy F. Dasher and Edwin S. Dasher as indorsers, on a note dated December 27th, 1856, due one day after date, for the sum of $1,200, with a credit thereon of $70, dated April 23d, 1857. When said cause was called for trial, defendants moved to dismiss the same because no affidavit as to payment of taxes had been filed as required by the Relief Act of 1870.

The plaintiff, Owen Smith, was sworn, who testified substantially as follows: That he, as administrator, sold certain real estate as the property of his intestate to Leroy F. Dasher and Edwin S. Dasher, who transferred the note sued on in payment therefor; that said sale occurred since June 1st, 1865; that said note is the property of the estate of Aaron Giddens, deceased ; that the widow and minors are the only heirs to said estate; that the indorsements were made since June 1st, 1865.

The Court dismissed the suit as to the makers, and ordered judgment against Edwin S. Dasher, one of the indorsers, there being no service as to the other; whereupon plaintiff in error excepted and assigns said ruling as error.

Peeples & Lyles, represented by C. Peeples ; A. H. Hansell, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendants.

*130McCay, Judge.

We have, in several cases since the passage of the Act of 13th October, 1870, ruled that if a widow and minor children were the equitable owners of a debt, the case was within the exceptions to that Act, even though the legal title was in a guardian, executor, administrator or trustee. This is clearly such a case. At the date of the Act this note was the property equitably of these minors and the widow, in good faith, and according to the rulings we have alluded to, the case is within the exceptions to the Act.

Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company,
a Colorado corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30,
2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
 November 14,
 2008
 /s/
 Mitchell
 T.G. GrayeMitchell
 T.G. GrayePresident
 and Chief Executive OfficerDated:
 November 14,
 2008
 /s/
 James
 L. McCallenJames
 L. McCallenSenior
 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document. 47