alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2129 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 10:34:34 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2129 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 10:34:34 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2129 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 10:34:34 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2129 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 10:34:34 Page 4 of

4
----

|                                               |   | State      or Other Jurisdiction of |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
| Name of      Entity                                |   | Incorporation or      Organization  |
|                                               |   |                                |
| 99¢      Only Stores Texas, Inc.              |   | Delaware                            |
| 99¢      Only Stores                          |   | Nevada                              |
| 8966      Reseda Associates, LLC (50% owned)       |   | California                          |
| REA      Associates La Quinta, LLC (65% owned)     |   | California                          |
| Wilshire      Alvarado Associates, LLC (50% owned) |   | California                          |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 23.01


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Travelers Property Casualty Corp.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on:

-    Form S-3   Nos. 333-2682, 333-2684, and 333-30293; and

-    Form S-8   Nos. 333-07073, 333-07077, 333-10143 and 333-25605.

of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. (formerly Travelers/Aetna Property
Casualty Corp.) of our reports dated January 17, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996 and the related
financial statement schedules, which reports are incorporated by reference in
the annual report on Form 10-K/A-2 of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
October 24, 1997
EXHIBIT 10.5 FORM OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                            SEVERANCE AGREEMENT AMONG

                            ACADIANA BANCSHARES, INC.

                                LBA SAVINGS BANK

                                       AND

                                    EXECUTIVE

         Amendment,  dated  as  of  July  16,  1999,  by  and  between  Acadiana
Bancshares, Inc., a Louisiana corporation (the "Corporation"), LBA Savings Bank,
a  Louisiana  chartered  savings  bank  and a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of the
Corporation  (the  "Savings  Bank")  and  Executive  (the  "Executive")  to  the
Severance Agreement (the "Agreement"),  dated as of July 15, 1996.  Hereinafter,
the  Corporation  and the  Savings  Bank are  referred  to  collectively  as the
"Employers."

         WHEREAS,  in accordance with Section 8 of the Agreement,  the Executive
and the  Employers  desire to revise the  Agreement  to  provide  for a one year
extension and automatic renewal for additional one year periods; and

         WHEREAS,  the Executive  and the  Employers  hereto desire to amend the
Agreement in certain respects in order to reflect such revised structure.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing,  and intending to be
legally bound hereby, the Executive and the Employers hereto agree as follows:

         Section 11 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

         "11.  Term of  Agreement.  The term of this  Agreement  shall be to and
through July 15, 2000, whereupon it shall be automatically  renewed on an annual
basis for additional one year periods unless the Employers give the Executive at
least 30 days prior notice in writing, that the agreement shall end at 5:00 p.m.
CST on the next  succeeding  July 15th following the date on which the notice is
given."

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this Amendment has been executed by the Executive
and the Employers'  respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date
first above written.

Attest:                                    ACADIANA BANCSHARES, INC.

/s/ Donna H. Domec                         By: /s/ Gerald G. Reaux, Jr.
---------------------                          ------------------------
Donna H. Domec                             Gerald G. Reaux, Jr.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Attest:                                    LBA SAVINGS BANK.

/s/ Donna H. Domec                         By: /s/ Gerald G. Reaux, Jr.
------------------                             ------------------------
Donna H. Domec                             Gerald G. Reaux, Jr.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

Witness:

/s/ witness                                 By: /s/ Executive
------------------                              --------------------------
                                            Executive
[Cite as State v. Mosley, 2014-Ohio-5013.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WARREN COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 CASE NOS. CA2014-04-056 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CA2014-04-057 

: D E C I S I O N

 - vs - 11/10/2014 

: 

JOHN GUS MOSLEY, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. 11 CR 27617 

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, 500 Justice Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 

45036, for plaintiff-appellee 

Michael K. Allen & Associates, Mary K. Martin, 5181 Natorp Blvd., Suite 210, Mason, Ohio 

45040, for defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, John Gus Mosley, has filed a brief with this 

court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) 
Warren CA2014-04-056 

 CA2014-04-057

indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any 

errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of 

error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the 

appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record 

independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and 

without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw 

as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that 

a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Environmental Management Advisory Board will be renewed for a two-year period beginning January 23, 2010.

The Board provides the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (EM) with information and strategic advice on a broad range of corporate issues affecting the EM program. These corporate issues include, but are not limited to, project management and oversight activities, cost/benefit analyses, program performance, human capital development, and contracts and acquisition strategies. Recommendations to the Department of Energy (DOE) on the programmatic resolution of numerous difficult issues will help achieve DOE's objective of the safe and efficient cleanup of its contaminated sites.

Additionally, the renewal of the Environmental Management Advisory Board has been determined to be essential to conduct DOE's business and to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on DOE by law and agreement. The Board will operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and rules and regulations issued in implementation of that Act.

Further information regarding this Advisory Board may be obtained from Ms. Terri Lamb, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 586-9007.

Issued in Washington, DC on January 19, 2010.

Carol A. Matthews,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-1208 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Lilburne Chandler, p. b. a., *vs.*Laura M. Woodword and Elizabeth K. Holland, executrices of James Dilworth, deceased, d. b. r.

*Appeal—Attorney-at-Law—Professional Services—Book of Original Entries—Oath of Plaintiff—Evidence—Transaction with the Deceased—Statute.*

Under the law of this State a book of original entries showing an account against a deceased person for professional services rendered by the plaintiff as attorney for the deceased in his lifetime, is not admissible upon the oath of the plaintiff, who is incompetent to testify as to “any transaction with or statement by the testator.”

*(December*3, 1907.)

Lore, C. J., and Spruance and Boyce, J. J., sitting,

*Thomas Davis*for plaintiff.

*George L. Townsend, Jr.,*for'defendant.

*55Superior Court, New Castle County,

November Term, 1907.

Appeal from judgment of a Justice of the Peace (No. 85, September Term, 1907.) This was an action of assumpsit to recover seventy-five dollars for professional services rendered by plaintiff as attorney for James Dilworth in his lifetime. A bill of particulars was filed. Defendants, at the trial, admitted the death of James Dilworth and the granting of letters testamentary upon his estate to the parties named in the action as defendants. Also that the plaintiff was, at the time of rendering the services alleged, and still is, an attorney duly admitted and licensed to practice in the courts of Delaware.

The plaintiff produced his book of original entries showing his account against James Dilworth, deceased, upon which his action was based. The account was offered in evidence, but was objected to by counsel for defendants as inadmissible, it being a transaction with the deceased.

Boyce, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

By *Section*11, *Chapter*107, *Rev. Code*(1893) page 799, it is provided that “a book of original entries, regularly and fairly kept, shall, together with the oath, or affirmation, of the plaintiff, be admitted in evidence to charge the defendant with the sums therein contained for goods sold and delivered, and other matters properly chargeable in an account.” This action is against the executors of a deceased person against whom the alleged book entries were made. By *Section*1, *Chapter*537, *Volume*16, *Laws of Delaware, Chapter*107, *Rev. Code*(1893) *page*798, it is provided “that in actions or proceedings by or against, executors, administrators or guardians in which judgment or decree may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other as to any transaction with or statement by the testator, intestate or ward unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party.” We do not think the plaintiff is compe*56tent to testify “as to any transaction with or statement by the testator,” in this action. We sustain the objection.

At the close of the case, Boyce, J., in his charge, reviewed the facts in the case and the contentions of counsel, and submitted the case to the jury.

Verdict for defendants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         962,453
<SECURITIES>                                10,157,281
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    129,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,404,812
<PP&E>                                      25,446,090
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,312,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,591,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,344,206
<BONDS>                                     10,381,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,998,863
<COMMON>                                         9,713
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,379,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,591,747
<SALES>                                         49,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,459,869
<CGS>                                           73,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,126,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,630,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,346,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,943,969)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,943,969)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
        

</TABLE>
EX-10A(XV)






Exhibit 10a(xv)




Named Executive Officer Salaries




	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Amount
	William R. Johnson
	 	$	1,250,000	 
	Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	David C. Moran
	 	$	651,000	 
	Executive Vice President — President & Chief Executive
Officer of Heinz North America
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	C. Scott O’Hara
	 	$	621,000	 
	Executive Vice President and President and Chief Executive
Officer of Heinz Europe
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Arthur B. Winkleblack
	 	$	625,000	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Michael D. Milone
	 	$	585,000	 
	Senior Vice President — Rest of World & Global Enterprise Risk
Management
!function(t,e){"use strict";"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define([window.dBlazy,window.Bio],e):"object"==typeof exports?module.exports=e(window.dBlazy,window.Bio):t.BioMedia=e(window.dBlazy,window.Bio)}(this,function(t,e){"use strict";var a=t,o=e,s="src",u="srcset",c="data-src",d="data-src",l="data-srcset",r=[s],p=[u,s];function i(t){return o.apply(this,arguments)}var n,f,e=i.prototype=Object.create(e.prototype);return e.constructor=i,e.prepare=(n=e.prepare,function(){var e,o=this;return o.options.breakpoints&&(e=[],a.forEach(o.options.breakpoints,function(t){if(r.push(t.src.replace("data-","")),t.width>=o.windowWidth)return c=t.src,e.push(c),!1}),0<e.length&&(c=e[0])),n.call(this)}),e.lazyLoad=(f=e.lazyLoad,function(t){if(!t.hasAttribute("data-bio-hit")){var e=this,o=t.parentNode,i=a.equal(t,"img"),r=void 0===t.src&&t.classList.contains(e.options.bgClass),n=o&&a.equal(o,"picture"),o=a.equal(t,"video");return n?(a.setAttrsWithSources(t,u,!0),a.setAttr(t,s,!0),e.loaded(t,e._ok)):o?(a.setAttrsWithSources(t,s,!0),t.load(),e.loaded(t,e._ok)):i||r?e.setImage(t,r):t.getAttribute(d)&&t.hasAttribute(s)&&(a.setAttr(t,s,!0),e.loaded(t,e._ok)),t.setAttribute("data-bio-hit",1),f.apply(this,arguments)}}),e.promise=function(r,n){var s=this;return new Promise(function(t,e){function o(){n?s.setBg(r):a.setAttrs(r,p,!1)}var i=new Image;i.onload=function(){o(),t(s._ok)},i.onerror=function(){o(),e(s._er)},i.src=r.getAttribute(n?c:d),r.hasAttribute(l)&&(i.srcset=r.getAttribute(l))})},e.setImage=function(e,o){var i=this;return i.promise(e,o).then(function(t){i.loaded(e,t),a.removeAttrs(e,o?r:p)}).catch(function(t){i.loaded(e,t),e.removeAttribute("data-bio-hit")}).finally(function(){a.trigger(e,"bio.finally",{options:i.options})})},e.setBg=function(t){t.hasAttribute(c)&&(t.style.backgroundImage='url("'+t.getAttribute(c)+'")',t.removeAttribute(s))},i});
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin C. Quinn, President of the Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of June 30, 2004 of First
Chester County Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

August 13, 2004


/S/ Kevin C. Quinn
------------------
Kevin C. Quinn
President
                                       33
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0543

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

ALAN PETER TWARDOSKI,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Jennifer B. Lint, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 17 2021

03/17/2021

Case Number: DA 18-0543
[No. 24463.

Department Two.

July 17, 1933.]

#### Globe Construction Company, Appellant, v. Amanda C. Yost, *Respondent.*
      *1*

*F. K. P. Raske,*for appellant.

*G. W. Louttit,*for respondent.

Reported in 23 P. (2d) 895.

Steinert, J.

This is an action to recover treble damages for wrongfully withholding from plaintiff the possession of certain lands during the period of a mortgage foreclosure action brought by the defendant, up to the time of sale of the land under a decree of fore*529closure therein obtained. Trial before the court without a jury resulted in findings, conclusions and judgment adverse to plaintiff, wherefore it appeals.

This is one of three cases bearing the same title and growing out of a protracted controversy between these parties relative to the title and rights to certain real estate, the improvements thereon and the products growing on the premises. The three cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial, but three separate appeals have been taken. The facts relative to the entire controversy will be found in *Globe Construction Co. v. Yost, ante*p. 522, wherein but one phase of the litigation was determined, namely, the title to the land. In this case is involved only the question of alleged damages during a particular period of time.

Prior to the commencement of this action, and on April 14, 1931, the appellant had begun an action in the superior court for Snohomish county, seeking recovery of possession of these same lands and damages for withholding possession thereof from it. On November 9,1931, after a trial upon the issues framed, the court entered a judgment denying appellant the relief sought and dismissing its complaint. An appeal was taken by the appellant, resulting in the affirmance of the judgment. *Globe Construction Co. v. Yost,*169 Wash. 319, 13 P. (2d) 433.

The matter in controversy here was included within the matter in controversy there. It either was, or else could have been, adjudicated in the former action. That judgment, therefore, became *res judicata*of the issues and matters here presented.

The judgment is affirmed.

Beals, C. J., Main, Tolman, and Blake, JJ., concur.