alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4422-4423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Clean Diesel V

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 10, 2009, pursuant to 
Section

[[Page 4423]]

6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute--
Cooperative Research Group on Clean Diesel V (``Clean Diesel V'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the following 
parties have withdrawn from this venture: BP America, Inc. Global Fuels 
Technology, Naperville, IL and Federal Mogul, Inc., Plymouth, MI.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Clean Diesel V intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On January 10, 2008, Clean Diesel V filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on February 25, 2008 (73 FR 10064).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 9, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register on December 17, 
2009 (74 FR 66995).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-1240 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1896 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 14:39:51 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1896 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 14:39:51 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1896 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 14:39:51 Page 3 of

3
<PAGE>
 
              [LETTERHEAD OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS APPEARS HERE]


                      Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on 
Form S-8 of our report dated August 5, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated 
financial statements of First Lancaster Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of 
June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, 
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years then 
ended, which report is included in First Lancaster Bancshares, Inc. Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1998. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Lexington, Kentucky
September 24, 1998
Exhibit 31.1




I, Jonathan M. Couchman, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Footstar, Inc.; and




2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date: May 2, 2011




By: /s/ Jonathan M. CouchmanJonathan M. CouchmanChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

CHARLES BASS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF 

PENNSYLVANIA THE 

SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-DALLAS, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 108 EM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2014, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
# **Exhibit 23**

# ** **

# ** **

# ** **

# **Consent of independent public accountants**

 

 

 

 

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to theincorporation of our reports incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, intothe Company’s previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 333-06133,333-06145, 333-42280, 333-81491, 333-90209 and 333-84818.

 

 

 

 

Arthur Andersen LLP

 

 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota,

March 25, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 475 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.475

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include vaccines against 
      seasonal influenza within the definition of taxable vaccines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITION OF VACCINES AGAINST SEASONAL INFLUENZA TO LIST OF 
TAXABLE VACCINES.
    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (N) of section 4132(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``or any other 
vaccine against seasonal influenza'' before the period.
    (b) Effective Date.--
        (1) Sales, etc.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
    to sales and uses on or after the later of--
            (A) the first day of the first month which begins more than 
        4 weeks after the date of the enactment of this Act, or
            (B) the date on which the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services lists any vaccine against seasonal influenza (other 
        than any vaccine against seasonal influenza listed by the 
        Secretary prior to the date of the enactment of this Act) for 
        purposes of compensation for any vaccine-related injury or 
        death through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund.
        (2) Deliveries.--For purposes of paragraph (1) and section 4131 
    of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of sales on or 
    before the effective date described in such paragraph for which 
    delivery is made after such date, the delivery date shall be 
    considered the sale date.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Richard A. Chesley (pro hac vice)

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

444 West Lake Street, Suite 900 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Tel: (312) 368-4000 

Fax: (312) 236-7516 

Email: richard.chesley@dlapiper.com 

Joshua D. Morse (SBN 211050) 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 

San Francisco, California 94105-2933 

Tel: (415) 836-2500 

Fax: (415) 836-2501 

Email: joshua.morse@dlapiper.com 

Attorneys for FTI Consulting, Inc. 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION 

- and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors. 

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation 

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

☒ Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

FOR ADMISSION OF A RICHARD A. 

CHESLEY PRO HAC VICE 

 

Signed and Filed: April 23, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

April 23, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1635 Filed: 04/23/19 Entered: 04/23/19 17:05:58 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-2- 

Richard A. Chesley, whose business address and telephone number are as follows: 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

444 West Lake Street, Suite 900 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Tel: (312) 368-4000 

Fax: (312) 236-7516 

Email: richard.chesley@dlapiper.com 

Is an active member in good standing of the bar of Illinois, having applied for admission to 

practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis representing FTI 

Consulting, Inc., in the above-entitled action. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and 

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac 

vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application 

will constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. 

** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1635 Filed: 04/23/19 Entered: 04/23/19 17:05:58 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002**




**CERTIFICATIONS**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Alan
      Kirschbaum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
      his knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/    
                Alan
                KirschbaumAlan
                Kirschbaum
              Chief
                Financial Officer


November
      14, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

The undersigned officers of AVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certify to our knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 3, 2005 | By:                                          |    /s/ Una S. Ryan     |   |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Name: Una S. Ryan, Ph.D.                     |
|                   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |                                         |
| Date: November 3, 2005 | By:                                          |    /s/ Avery W. Catlin |   |
|                   | Name: Avery W. Catlin                        |
|                   | Title: Senior Vice President and             |
|                   | Chief Financial  Officer                     |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending  December 31, 2010 (the  "Report") I, William
E.  Beifuss,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18USC  ss.ss..1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: February 22, 2011

                       By: \s\William E. Beifuss
                       ---------------------------------------------------------
                       William E. Beifuss, Chief Executive Officer and President
                       (Principal Executive Officer)


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### ADELIA K. BROOME, Respondent, *v.*HELEN F. TAYLOR and JAMES T. TAYLOR, her Husband, Appellants.

*Married women*— coverture *rrmst be set v/p in answer*— *allegations of com/plczint as to.*

Where in an action brought against a husband and wife, upon a bond given by the wife, the caption of the complaint described him as “her husband,” *held,*that this referred only to the time when the action was commenced, and did not amount to an allegation that she was a married woman at the time of giving the bond.

The complaint set forth a copy of the bond, in which she was described as the *156wife of the defendant James. *Held,*that this did not amount to an allegation that she was the wife of the defendant James, hut merely that she executed a paper in which she was so described.

Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer as frivolous and directing *k*judgment for the plaintiff. The action was brought upon a bond executed by the defendant Helen F. Taylor. The defendant demurred on the ground that .it appeared on the face of the complaint that the defendant was a married woman and not liable thereon.

*Oroolts &*Ta/ylor, for the appellants.

*James IE.*Broome, for the respondent.

PRATT, J.:

The complaint nowhere alleges the coverture of the defendant Helen, at the time she executed the bond.

The caption of the complaint describes the defendant James as her husband.

'But-that can only be held to refer to the time when the action is brought.

The complaint contains a copy of the bond, in which defendant Helen is described as the wife of defendant James.

But the pleader does not thereby allege that she was his wife, merely .that she executed a paper in which she was so described, in other words, that on a certain occasion, she called herself his wife. If the coverture existed, and was relied on as a defense, it should be distinctly pleaded.

Suppose defendant Helen had pleaded in bar to the complaint, that at the time she made the bond, she called herself a married woman.

That allegation would be the exact equivalent of the one now relied on to show her coverture.

It would be no defense to her bond, when pleaded as an answer, and it is no defect in the complaint that it appears therein.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present — Pratt and Dyeman, J J. BarNArd, P. J., not sitting.

Order overruling demurrer affirmed, with costs.
RESIGNATION OF


RESIGNATION OF

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OF

ZENDEX HOLDINGS, INC.




The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held on May 25th, 2016




The Board of Directors who were present for this meeting & took active part therein were: 




Josh Turner

Alex Demitriev







WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to formally RESIGN and renounce all further corporate designation or affiliation with Zendex Holdings, Inc.; 







NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the corporation having considered this matter, has opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue, and pursuant to NRS 78.320 has decided unanimously and RESOLVED that: I Josh Turner do hereby formally RESIGN, and sever any and all officials ties, duties, obligations or liabilities regarding Zendex Holdings, Inc. and do, by affixing, my signature hereto, officially as my last corporate act, DO HEREBY RESIGN. 




The Director of the corporation, by affixing his signature hereto, does hereby formally resign, and shall allow the new Board to choose its Directors at a time and place of its choosing.  










DATED:  May 25th, 2016







/s/ Josh Turner

Josh Turner, Director, CEO 

Zendex Holdings, Inc.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSENLLP**

 

On June 24,2002, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting that as of thatdate, the Company discontinued the engagement of Arthur Andersen LLP(“Andersen”) as its independent public accountants and engaged Deloitte &Touche LLP as its independent auditors for fiscal year 2002.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K, whichincludes the report of Andersen on the Company’s consolidated statements ofoperations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 28,2001 and financial statement schedule, is incorporated by reference into ourpreviously filed Registration Statements, File Nos. 33-26145, 333-50143 and333-88161 (collectively, the “Registration Statements”).  After reasonable efforts, we have beenunable to obtain Andersen’s consent to incorporate by reference into theRegistration Statements its audit report with respect to the financialstatements of the Company for the year ended December 28, 2001.  Under these circumstances, Rule 437(a) underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, permits us to file this Form 10-Kwithout such consent from Andersen.  Theabsence of such consent may limit recovery by investors on certain claims,including the inability of investors to assert claims against Andersen underSection 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for any untrue statementsof a material fact contained, or any omissions to state a material factrequired to be stated, in those audited financial statements.  In addition, the ability of Andersen tosatisfy any claims (including claims arising from Andersen’s provision ofauditing and other services to us) may be limited as a practical matter due torecent events regarding Andersen.

 

----
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>













                          Independent Auditors' Consent
                          -----------------------------


The Board of Directors
Wayne Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements  No.
333-34505 and No.  333-34503 on Forms S-8 of Wayne  Bancorp,  Inc. of our report
dated  January 21, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated  statements of financial
condition of Wayne Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
and the related  consolidated  statements  of income,  changes in  stockholders'
equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended
December 31, 1997, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31,
1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Wayne Bancorp, Inc.


                                                     
                                                     
                                                     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Short Hills, New Jersey
March 30, 1998
FILED

July 24, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

 THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTION

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES CREDIT ) SULLIVAN CIRCUIT

UNION, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellee ) NO. 03A01-9703-CV-00085

)

v. )

) HON. JOHN S. McCLELLAN, III

RHONDA SANDERS, )

)

Defendant/Appellant ) AFFIRMED

Dean Greer, Kingsport, for Appellant

William K. Rogers, Kingsport, for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

INMAN, Senior Judge

The General Sessions and Circuit Courts held the appellant liable to the

appellee for a series of credit card charges incurred over a period of two years by

virtue of a VISA Credit Card issued jointly to the appellant and her now-deceased

husband. She appeals, insisting that she did not sign the application for the card

and hence cannot be liable.

The appellant’s husband made application for a credit card and signed the

appellant’s name together with his, on the application, which was approved. Each

was issued a card, with the same number, although the appellant’s card was

retained by her husband.

Her husband used the card frequently and monthly statements were regularly

mailed to them. Payments were made monthly and, on one occasion, the appellant

and her husband obtained a loan to pay jointly incurred credit card debts. On

another occasion, the appellant used the card to pay for a substantial purchase at a

Sears store. After his death on December 12, 1994 the balance owing on the credit
1

 Rule 10. Affirmance Without Opinion - Memorandum Opinion.

(b) Memorandum Opinion. The Court, with the concurrence of all judges

participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by

mem orandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. W hen

a case is decided by mem orandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM

OPINION,” shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in a

subsequent unrelated case. [As amended by order filed April 22, 1992.]

2

card debt was $3,036.49, for which the appellant denied liability because she had not

signed the application for the credit card. 

The proof was sufficient to justify a finding that the appellant inferentially

acquiesced in the incurrence of these debts. Each signed the other’s name on

business documents over a period of years and, for a period of two years, monthly

invoices for credit card charges were recognized by her. In light of these essentially

undisputed facts, we agree with the trial judge that the post-mortem is untenable.

Our review is de novo on the record, accompanied by the presumption that

the trial court’s findings of fact are correct unless the evidence otherwise

preponderates. RULE 13(d), TENN. R. APP. P.

This case is peculiarly subject to disposition by application of RULE 10, TENN.

R. APP. P.,1

 and the judgment is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

_____________________________

William H. Inman, Senior Judge

CONCUR:

_______________________________

Houston M. Goddard, Presiding Judge

_______________________________

Charles D. Susano, Jr., Judge