alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cox, Marshall *&*Company *et al.,*plaintiffs in error, *vs.*John R. Cook, sheriff, defendant in error.

Where a homestead in land is set apart, the applicant is entitled to the crops growing on the same. (R.)

Rule against sheriff. Homestead. Growing crops. Before Judge Cole. Houston Superior Court. December Term, 1871.

For the facts of this case, see the decission.

Duncan *&*Miller, for plaintiffs in error.

Warren & Grice, for defendant.

*302Warner, Chief Justice.

This was a rule against the sheriff, calling upon him to show cause why he had not made the money on certain executions placed in his hands against the defendant. The sheriff showed cause, in writing, which was traversed by the plaintiffs, and the facts were agreed to be submitted to the presiding Judge without the intervention of a jury. The Judge, after hearing the case, discharged the rule against the sheriff) and the plaintiffs excepted. It appears from the return of the sheriff, that he could not find any property of the defendant’s except that which had been set apart to him as a homestead, or the crops raised on said homestead. The sheriff had been directed to levy on certain cotton in the possession of defendant. It appears from the records of the Court of Ordinary which were offered in evidence, that the defendant had taken a homestead in certain described lands, and personal property, including the growing crop, and that the cotton on which he was directed to levy, and which was found in the defendant’s possession, (to-wit,) from two to four bales was a part of the homestead, that is to say, in the words of the sheriff’s return, was a part of the crop raised on the homestead. If it was a part of the crop raised on the homestead set apart to the defendant, then it was not subject, and the sheriff is not liable for failing to make a levy thereon. If the defendant in obtaining his homestead on the land went further and had the growing crop on the land set apart to him as personal property, that did not place him in any worse condition as to the crop on the land set apart as a homestead; he was entitled to the crop on the homestead set apart to him, whether he had claimed it as a homestead of personal property or not. The fact that he claimed the crop growing on the land as a homestead in personalty in his schedule, did not place him in any worse condition than if he had not claimed it as personalty, he was entitled to the crops raised on the land set' apart as a homestead anyhow. In our judgment there was no error in the *303judgment of the Court in discharging the rule against the sheriff, on the statement of facts contained in the record.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         June 18, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeffrey H. Hurst, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7208, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0303,                         *hurstj@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 19, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-12548 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
ACTIONS OF THE MAY 28, 2019, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

On Tuesday, May 28, 2019, the Smithsonian Institution Board of Regents convened in 

Washington, D. C. for an executive session to consider the appointment of the fourteenth

Secretary of the Smithsonian. Vice President Michael R. Pence, Senator David Perdue, and 

Representative Lucille Roybal-Allard were unable to participate. Chancellor John G. Roberts, Jr., 

presided over the unanimous election of Lonnie G. Bunch III as the fourteenth Secretary of the 

Smithsonian Institution pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 44. The Board also approved the following 

motions:

VOTED that the Smithsonian Institution Board of Regents elects Lonnie G. Bunch III as the 14th 

Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 44. [2019.05.01]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the compensation recommendation for the 14th 

Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. [2019.05.02]
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated July 11, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements of AdvanSource Biomaterials Corporation as of and for the year ended March 31, 2012, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-149341, 333-149342, 333-149343, 333-117594, 333-106607 and 333-05893), Form SB-2 (File No. 333-122123), Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-110779 and 333-72223), and Form S-4 (File No. 333-102115).
|                                             |
|---------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Moody, Famiglietti & Andronico, LLP |
| Tewksbury, Massachusetts                    |
| July 11, 2012                               |
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Charles B. Lang, President
(Principal Executive Officer) of Tri-State 1stBanc, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: April 26, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Charles B. Lang
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Charles B. Lang    
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | President
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mi Song Yun v. Mohamed aka Andrew Hajali

Appellate case number: 01-18-00961-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-27741

Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded for the trial court to determine whether appellant is indigent 

and entitled to proceed with this appeal without payment of costs. The supplemental clerk’s record filed 

on February 13, 2019 contains an order from the trial court finding that appellant is not indigent. 

Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Prior to our abatement, appellant filed motions requesting that this Court find her indigent and 

extend the deadline for filing the record. Appellant’s motions are DENIED. Because appellant has not 

established indigence, appellant is ORDERED to pay the appellate filing fee for this case and the fee for 

preparation of the clerk’s record within 30 days of this order or the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). Appellant is further ORDERED to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the 

court reporter’s fee for preparing the reporter’s record within 30 days of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Sarah Beth Landau_______

Acting individually 

Date: __February 21, 2019___
#### James Shanks, Respondent, *v.*The Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant.

*Attachment*— *allegation in the alternative in regard to the incorporation of a foreign corporation*— *insufficient.*

The affidavit upon which an attachment was granted against a corporation alleged that the plaintiff had “a cause of action against the above-named defendant which is or holds itself out to be a foreign corporation,” etc.

*Held,*that there was no sufficient allegation of the fact that the defendant was a corporation to sustain the attachment; that the allegation in the alternative was not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of sections 685 and 636 of the Code of Civil Procedure authorizing the issuing of an attachment in certain cases where the defendant is a foreign corporation.

Appeal by the defendant, The Magnolia Metal Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of July, 1895, denying its motion to vacate an attachment granted in the action.

The affidavit upon which the attachment in this action was granted was as follows :

“James Shanks, being duly sworn, deposes and says, I am the plaintiff ; I have a cause of action against the above-named defendant which is, or holds itself out to be, a foreign corporation, which claim arises out of contract other than a contract to marry and the amount of which said claim is $7,600, over and above all counterclaim and all offsets known to me.”

The allegation of the complaint in regard to the defendant’s incorporation was as follows :

“ That at all the time herein stated defendant was an association or combination of persons, and held and holds itself out to be a foreign corporation created under the laws of "West Yirginia.”

*A. S.*Bacon, for the appellant.

*L. A. Gould,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

"We are of opinion that there was no sufficient allegation of the fact that the defendant was a corporation. The allegation in the *487alternative is not sufficient to satisfy tlie requirements of the Code wliicli authorizes tlie issuing of an attachment in certain cases where the defendant is a foreign corporation. If the plaintiff is not willing to make his allegation in a definite form when lie proceeds against a foreign corporation, he cannot procure the benefits of the statute, given him as against foreign corporations.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., and Parker, J.

Order reversed, with ten dollars and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
#### Elizabeth R. Wells, Respondent, v. The World’s Dispensary Medical Association, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Bradley, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of United Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt R.
Weise, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kurt R. Weise
----------------------------
Kurt R. Weise
Chief Executive Officer


March 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2654 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2654

 To suspend temporarily the duty on machines, and their parts, for use 
         in the manufacture of digital versatile discs (DVDs).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2000

 Mr. Coverdell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on machines, and their parts, for use 
         in the manufacture of digital versatile discs (DVDs).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.84.09    Electrical        Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     machines and                                                            31/03            ''
                     apparatus,                                                                                .
                     whether
                     imported
                     separately or
                     as an entirety,
                     and parts
                     thereof, for
                     use in the
                     manufacture of
                     digital
                     versatile discs
                     (DVDs)
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     8543.89.96)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                  EXHIBIT 32.3

                        FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E.
Balzarini,  Treasurer  and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: August 9, 2005                        /s/ John E. Balzarini
                                            ---------------------------
                                                John E. Balzarini
                                                Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1







Exhibit 10.1




SECOND AMENDMENT TO 2007 AGREEMENT




This Second Amendment (this “Second Amendment”) relating to Section 7 of the 2007 Agreement by and between A.
Schulman, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and a group of investors led by Barington Capital Group, L.P. (collectively, the
“Barington Group”) dated as of November 15, 2007 (the “2007 Agreement”), as amended by the First Amendment to the 2007
Agreement (the “First Amendment”) (collectively, the “Agreement”), is hereby made as of this 1st day of
June, 2009 by the Corporation and the Barington Group.



WHEREAS, on November 15, 2007, the Corporation entered into the 2007 Agreement with the Barington Group in order
to avoid a proxy contest at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;



WHEREAS, as of October 10, 2008, the Corporation entered into the First Amendment with the Barington Group in
order to change the membership of the Special Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors;



WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Barington Group now desire to amend Section 7 of the 2007 Agreement to provide
for the formation of a Strategic Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors; and



WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 of the Agreement, James A. Mitarotonda has been irrevocably appointed as
attorney-in-fact and representative for all members of the Barington Group, and has full power and authority to execute
this Amendment.



NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows:



1. Amendment of Section 7 of the Agreement. Section 7 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read
(in its entirety) as follows:



“Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, the Board shall establish a strategic committee of the Board
(the “Strategic Committee”) under the charter attached hereto as Exhibit I. The initial members of the Strategic
Committee shall consist of John B. Yasinsky, Michael A. McManus, Jr., Howard R. Curd, Lee D. Meyer and Mitarotonda, and
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer serving as a nonvoting member (with Mr. Curd serving as Chairman). From and
after the establishment of the Strategic Committee, it shall be governed by the Board and shall function as a regular
committee of the Corporation pursuant to Article III, Section 10 of the By Laws of the Corporation.”



[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]






 


1









 









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the duly authorized signatories of the
parties as of the date hereof.



A. SCHULMAN, INC.



By:/s/ Joseph M. Gingo                                     

Name: Joseph M. Gingo

Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer




BARINGTON REPRESENTATIVE



By:/s/ James A. Mitarotonda                             


Name: James A. Mitarotonda



 


2
Order entered December 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01102-CV

CONTINENTAL INTERMODAL GROUP- SOUTH TEXAS, L.L.C., JONATHAN 

GREEN AND CONTINENTAL INTERMODAL GROUP G.P., L.L.C., Appellants

V.

ELOY P. GARCIA AND BALCONES MUSTER, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-07993

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Antionette Reagor’s December 11, 2016 second motion 

for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the motion and ORDER Ms. 

Reagor to file the reporter’s record within THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. We 

caution Ms. Reagor that further requests for extension of time will be disfavored.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE