28652 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 98 / Friday, May 21, 2010 / Notices 

complainant filed a letter 

supplementing the complaint. The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain electronic paper towel 

dispensing devices and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

6,871,815; 7,017,856; 7,182,289; and 

7,387,274. The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and cease and desist 

orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

A. Murray, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–2734. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

May 14, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain electronic paper 

towel dispensing devices or components 

thereof that infringe one or more of 

claims 1–7 of U.S. Patent No. 6,871,815; 

claims 1–22 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,017,856; claims 1–3 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,182,289; and claims 1–22 of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,387,274, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: GeorgiaPacific Consumer Products LP, 133 

Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, GA 

30303. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Kruger Products LP, 1900 Minnesota 

Court, Suite 200, Mississauga 

(Ontario) Canada L5N 5R5; 

KTG USA LP, 400 Mahannah Avenue, 

Memphis, TN 38107; 

Stefco Industries, Inc., 1006 Marley 

Drive, Haines City, FL 33844; 

Cellynne Corporation, 1006 Marley 

Drive, Haines City, FL 33844; 

Draco Hygienic Products Inc., 716 S. 

Bon View Avenue, Ontario, CA 

91761. 

NetPak Electronic Plastic and Cosmetic, 

Inc., d/b/a Open for Business, 1642 N. 

Campbell Avenue, Chicago, IL 60647; 

NetPak Elektronik Plastik ve Kozmetik 

Sanayi, Ve Ticaret Ltd., 1563 Sk. No: 

8 35110, I ̇zmir, Turkey; 

Paradigm Marketing Consortium, Inc., 

350 Michael Drive, Suite 4, Syosset, 

NY 11791; 

United Sourcing Network Corp., 350 

Michael Drive, Syosset, NY 11791; 

New Choice (H.K.) Ltd., Unit 03, G/F., 

Block B, Shatin Ind. Centre, 5–7 Yuen 

Shun Circuit, Shatin, Hong Kong; 

Vida International Inc., #8, Lane 281, 

Lung-Chiang Road, Taipei, Taiwan. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Lisa A. Murray, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 17, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12210 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 332–516; Investigation 

No. 332–517] 

Certain Environmental Goods: 

Probable Economic Effect of Duty-Free 

Treatment for U.S. Imports; Certain 

Environmental Goods: U.S. 

International Trade and Competitive 

Conditions 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigations and 

scheduling of hearing. 

SUMMARY: Following receipt of a request 

dated April 16, 2010 from the United 

States Trade Representative (USTR) 

under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 

1930 (19 U.S.C. 1332(g)), the U.S. 

International Trade Commission 

(Commission) instituted investigation 

No. 332–516, Certain Environmental 

Goods: Probable Economic Effect of 

Duty-Free Treatment for U.S. Imports, 

and investigation No. 332–517, Certain 

Environmental Goods: U.S. 

International Trade and Competitive 

Conditions. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 98 / Friday, May 21, 2010 / Notices 28653 

DATES: 

Investigation No. 332–516: 

July 7, 2010: Deadline for filing 

written submissions from interested 

parties. 

October 18, 2010: Transmittal of the 

Commission’s report to USTR. 

Investigation No. 332–517: 

September 7, 2010: Deadline for filing 

requests to appear at the public hearing. 

September 14, 2010: Deadline for 

filing pre-hearing briefs and statements. 

September 28, 2010: Public hearing. 

October 6, 2010: Deadline for filing 

post-hearing briefs and written 

submissions from interested parties. 

February 16, 2011: Transmittal of the 

Commission’s report to USTR. 

ADDRESSES: All Commission offices, 

including the Commission’s hearing 

rooms, are located in the United States 

International Trade Commission 

Building, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC. All written 

submissions should be addressed to the 

Secretary, United States International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/edis.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coproject leaders Karl Tsuji (202–205– 

3434 or karl.tsuji@usitc.gov) or Andrew 

David (202–205–3368 or 

andrew.david@usitc.gov) for 

information specific to these 

investigations. For information on the 

legal aspects of these investigations, 

contact William Gearhart of the 

Commission’s Office of the General 

Counsel (202–205–3091 or 

william.gearhart@usitc.gov). The media 

should contact Margaret O’Laughlin, 

Office of External Relations (202–205– 

1819 or margaret.olaughlin@usitc.gov). 

Hearing-impaired individuals may 

obtain information on this matter by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal at 202–205–1810. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

Persons with mobility impairments who 

will need special assistance in gaining 

access to the Commission should 

contact the Office of the Secretary at 

202–205–2000. 

Background: As requested, in the first 

report (investigation No. 332–516), the 

Commission will provide advice as to 

the probable economic effect on U.S. 

industries and on U.S. consumers of 

reducing U.S. tariffs to zero on dutiable 

imported environmental goods from all 

U.S. trading partners, based on 2010 

HTS nomenclature at the 8-digit level, 

and using 2009 trade data. In absence of 

a universally accepted definition of an 

‘‘environmental good,’’ the Commission, 

for purposes of its analysis, will refer to 

the items proposed in Annex III of WTO 

document TN/TE/19, and as applicable, 

the additional product-specific 

descriptions set out in that Annex. 

As requested, for the second report 

(investigation No. 332–517), the 

Commission will: 

• Provide an overview of the current 

state of global environmental goods 

trade; and 

• Develop industry, trade, and market 

information for the items proposed in 

Annex III of WTO document TN/TE/19, 

taking into account to the extent 

possible, the additional, more detailed 

product descriptions in that Annex. 

Such information will include major 

U.S. producers and exporters, key U.S. 

export markets, MFN applied and 

bound tariffs in those markets, and the 

value of U.S. imports and exports for 

2007–09, to the extent practical; and 

• Prepare several case studies on the 

competitive position of selected U.S. 

environmental goods industries that 

produce the items proposed in Annex III 

of WTO document TN/TE/19. The 

Commission will select environmental 

goods of significant export and/or 

commercial interest to the United 

States. Each case study will include a 

description of the competitive factors 

affecting exports, or the potential to 

export, and to the extent practical, 

identify tariff and non-tariff measures, 

government programs, and 

technological advantages, and provide 

information on shares in domestic and 

major foreign markets as well as other 

relevant information. 

The Commission will submit its first 

report to USTR by October 18, 2010, and 

its second report to USTR by February 

16, 2011. The USTR indicated that the 

portions of the Commission’s first report 

and its associated working papers that 

deal with the requested probable 

economic effect advice, as well as 

relevant parts of the more detailed 

analysis, as identified by USTR, will be 

classified as ‘‘confidential.’’ The USTR 

said that his office will provide further 

guidance relating on the extent to which 

portions of the two reports require 

classification and the duration. The 

USTR also stated that he considers the 

Commission’s reports to be inter-agency 

memoranda that will contain predecisional advice and be subject to the 

deliberative process privilege. 

Public Hearing: A public hearing in 

connection with the second 

investigation (No. 332–517) will be held 

at the U.S. International Trade 

Commission Building, 500 E Street, 

SW., Washington, DC, beginning at 9:30 

a.m. on September 28, 2010. Requests to 

appear at the public hearing should be 

filed with the Secretary, no later than 

5:15 p.m., September 7, 2010, in 

accordance with the requirements in the 

‘‘Submissions’’ section below. All prehearing briefs and statements should be 

filed not later than 5:15 p.m., September 

14, 2010; and all post-hearing briefs and 

statements should be filed not later than 

5:15 p.m., October 6, 2010. In the event 

that, as of the close of business on 

September 7, 2010, no witnesses are 

scheduled to appear at the hearing, the 

hearing will be canceled. Any person 

interested in attending the hearing as an 

observer or nonparticipant may call the 

Secretary to the Commission (202–205– 

2000) after September 7, 2010, for 

information concerning whether the 

hearing will be held. The Commission 

intends to issue a subsequent Federal 

Register notice that will provide details 

on the subject areas that would be of 

particular interest for witnesses to 

address at the public hearing. 

Written Submissions: In lieu of or in 

addition to participating in the hearing, 

interested parties are invited to submit 

written statements concerning these 

investigations. All written submissions 

should be addressed to the Secretary, 

and should be received not later than 

5:15 p.m. on the respective dates 

specified above for each investigation. 

All written submissions must conform 

with the provisions of section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8 

requires that a signed original (or a copy 

so designated) and fourteen (14) copies 

of each document be filed. In the event 

that confidential treatment of a 

document is requested, at least four (4) 

additional copies must be filed, in 

which the confidential information 

must be deleted (see the following 

paragraph for further information 

regarding confidential business 

information). The Commission’s rules 

authorize filing submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means only to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook 

for Electronic Filing Procedures, http:// 

www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_

notices/rules/documents/handbook_on_

electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with 

questions regarding electronic filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205– 

2000). Any submissions that contain 

confidential business information must 

also conform with the requirements of 

section 201.6 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

201.6). Section 201.6 of the rules 

requires that the cover of the document 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
28654 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 98 / Friday, May 21, 2010 / Notices 

and the individual pages be clearly 

marked as to whether they are the 

‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’ 

version, and that the confidential 

business information be clearly 

identified by means of brackets. All 

written submissions, except for 

confidential business information, will 

be made available for inspection by 

interested parties. 

Some or all of the confidential 

business information that the 

Commission receives in this 

investigation may be included in the 

report that the Commission sends to the 

USTR. However, any confidential 

business information received by the 

Commission in this investigation and 

used in preparing this report will not be 

published in a manner that would 

reveal the operations of the firm 

supplying the information. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 14, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12211 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–696] 

In the Matter of Certain Restraining 

Systems for Transport, Components 

Thereof, and Methods of Using Same; 

Notice of Commission Determination 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Respondent’s Second 

Amended Motion To Terminate the 

Investigation in Its Entirety Based on a 

Consent Order Stipulation and To 

Issue a Consent Order; Termination of 

the Investigation 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 6) granting 

respondent’s second amended motion to 

terminate the investigation in its 

entirety based on a consent order 

stipulation and to issue a consent order. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia 

Chen, Office of the General Counsel, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. 

Copies of non-confidential documents 

filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

investigation was instituted on 

December 29, 2009, based on a 

complaint filed by Matthew Bullock and 

Walnut Industries, Inc. 74 FR 68865 

(Dec. 29, 2009). The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain restraining systems for transport, 

components thereof, and methods of 

using the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of United 

States Patent Nos. 6,089,802, 6,227,779, 

and 6,981,827. The complaint named 

Qingdao Auront Industry & Trade Co. 

Ltd. (‘‘Auront’’) as the sole respondent. 

On March 16, 2010, Auront filed a 

motion to terminate the investigation 

based on a consent order stipulation. 

The Commission investigative attorney 

(‘‘IA’’) opposed the motion to terminate 

because Auront did not satisfy the 

Commission Rules. On April 5, 2010, 

Auront filed a second motion to 

terminate based on a revised consent 

order. On April 14, 2010, Auront filed 

an amendment to its second motion 

with additional revisions to the consent 

order stipulation. On April 20, 2010, 

complainants filed an opposition to 

Auront’s motions. On the same day, the 

IA filed a response in support of 

termination. 

On April 21, 2010, the ALJ issued an 

initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting 

Auront’s second amended motion to 

terminate the investigation. The ALJ 

found that the motion complied with 

the requirements of Commission Rule 

210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). The ALJ also 

concluded that, pursuant to 

Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 

210.50(b)(2)), there is no evidence that 

termination of this investigation will 

prejudice the public interest. 

Accordingly, the ALJ terminated the 

investigation. No petitions for review of 

this ID were filed. The Commission has 

determined not to review the ALJ’s ID 

terminating the investigation and to 

issue the consent order submitted by 

Auront. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

§ 210.45 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.45). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 17, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12266 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–63,052] 

Chrysler LLC; St. Louis North 

Assembly Plant, Including On-Site 

Leased Workers From HAAS TCM, Inc., 

Logistics Services, Inc., Robinson 

Solutions, and Yazaki North America; 

Fenton, MO; Amended Certification 

Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and 

section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 

U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the 

Department of Labor issued a 

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance and 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance on April 14, 2008, applicable 

to workers of Chrysler LLC, St. Louis 

North Assembly Plant, Fenton, 

Missouri. The notice was published in 

the Federal Register on May 2, 2008 (73 

FR 24317). The certification was 

amended on November 18, 2009 and 

December 9, 2009 to include on-site 

leased workers from HAAS TCM, Inc. 

and Logistics Services, Inc. The notices 

were published in the Federal Register 

on December 1, 2008 (73 FR 72848) and 

December 18, 2008 (73 FR 77069) 

respectively. It was amended again on 

October 30, 2009 to include on-site 

leased workers from Robinson 

Solutions, and again March 31, 2010 to 

include Logistics Management Services, 

and on April 20, 2010 to include 

Corrigan Company and Murphy 

Company. The notices were published 

in the Federal Register on November 12, 

2009 (74 FR 58316), April 19, 2010 (75 

FR 203832–20383), and April 29, 2010 

(75 FR 22627–22628) respectively. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES