alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2636

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide pay parity for dentists

with physicians employed by the Veterans Health Administration, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25, 2000

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide pay parity

for dentists with physicians employed by the Veterans

Health Administration, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Vet5 erans Affairs Dentists Appreciation Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PAY PARITY FOR DENTISTS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7435(b) of title 38,

8 United States Code, is amended—
2

•S 2636 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘$3,500’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘$9,000’’;

3 (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by amending the table

4 to read as follows:

‘‘Length of Service

Rate

Minimum Maximum

2 years but less than 4 years ................................. $4,000 $6,000

4 years but less than 8 years ................................. 6,000 12,000

8 years but less than 12 years ............................... 12,000 18,000

12 years or more ..................................................... 12,000 25,000’’;

5 (3) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘$20,000’’

6 and inserting ‘‘$40,000’’;

7 (4) in paragraph (4)(A), by amending the table

8 to read as follows:

‘‘Position

Rate

Minimum Maximum

Service Chief (or in a comparable position as determined by the Secretary) ................................. $4,500 $15,000

Chief of Staff or in an Executive Grade ................ 14,500 25,000

Director Grade ........................................................ 0 25,000’’;

9 (5) in paragraph (4)(B), by amending the table

10 to read as follows:

‘‘Position Rate

Deputy Service Director .............................................................. $20,000

Service Director ........................................................................... 25,000

Deputy Assistant Under Secretary for Health ............................ 27,500

Assistant Under Secretary for Health (or in a comparable position as determined by the Secretary) ...................................... 30,000’’;

11 (6) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and

12 inserting ‘‘$17,000’’; and
3

•S 2636 IS

1 (7) in paragraph (7)(A), by striking ‘‘$5,000’’

2 and inserting ‘‘$15,000’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to any contract entered into under

5 chapter 74 of title 38, United States Code, after the date

6 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 13, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 13, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0156. ABM AVIATION, INC. d/b/a AIR SERV CORPORATION v. LOREE PRINCE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2020CV02460
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4576

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRANDON SCOTT MORTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CR-02-871)

Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Barlow Loggins, Assistant Federal Public Defender,

Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Isaac Louis Johnson,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Morton appeals his conviction pursuant to a

guilty plea and 151-month sentence for two counts of bank robbery,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2000). Counsel for Morton has

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), in which he states there are no meritorious grounds for

appeal, but presenting one issue for this court’s review. Although

notified of his right to file a supplemental brief, Morton has not

done so. Finding no error, we affirm.

Counsel suggests that the district court erred in failing

to depart downward from Morton’s sentencing range for his

substantial assistance to the Government. However, in the plea

agreement, the Government retained discretion over whether to make

a substantial assistance motion; it was not obligated to so move.

See United States v. Snow, 234 F.3d 187, 190 (4th Cir. 2000).

Moreover, the denial of a request for a downward departure is not

reviewable on appeal unless the district court mistakenly believed

it lacked the authority to depart. United States v. Bayerle, 898

F.2d 28, 30 (4th Cir. 1990). The record indicates the district

court understood its authority to depart, but that it chose not to

depart. Therefore, Morton’s claim is unreviewable on appeal.

As required by Anders, we have reviewed the entire record

and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we

affirm Morton’s conviction and sentence. The court requires that
- 3 -

counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the

Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the

client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that

such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this

court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion

must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
Michael A. Zeher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/     Michael A.
      ZeherMichael
      A. Zeher
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer


November
12, 2010




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4744 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4744

  To prohibit funding of the Rural Utilities Service High Energy Cost 
                             Grant Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2014

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit funding of the Rural Utilities Service High Energy Cost 
                             Grant Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING OF THE RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE HIGH 
              ENERGY COST GRANT PROGRAM.

    No funds available to the Department of Agriculture or any other 
department or agency may be used to provide funding directly or 
indirectly for grants under section 19(a)(1) of the Rural 
Electrification Act of 1936.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICE OF THE AnOIiNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN

HonorableHomer Garrison,Jr. Director,Departmentof Public Safety Austin, Texas
Dear Sir:

We are in receipt wherein you request our opin ing of passes or fra agency to members of tion of the anti-pass by the 46th Legislat the anti-passprov sport -ion "\) Of August 31, 1939, er or not the granty transportation 1 would be a violapropriationbill passe& ou have reference to 7, 46th Legislature. nion No. O-445 of this General.

James P.Hart tatlon Division of the opinion Is es provisionsof Senate Bill force and effect, due to of the bill to give reasontains provisions relating to the eubJect ee passes to State employees. Such antiId the same cannot be violated. ion be misleading, however,we feel o you Article 4005, Revised Civil Stagenerally the granting of free passes an8 frankingprivilegesby steam or eleotrlcrailway companies, street railway companies, interurbanrailway companies,other charteredtransportation companies,express oompanles,sleeping oar companies,telegram companies, telephone companiesand other persons or aseoclatlonsof persona operating the Bame to any person, firm or associationof persons except a8 thereafter provided In the same title. Article 4006, Revised Civil Statutes, sets forth a long list of persons to whom free passes may be granted.

### 745

Hon. Homer Garrison,Jr. #2

A large number of these are public officer8 and a8 to moat of them no specificrequirementis made that they shall be engaged in the discharge of officialduties at the time of making u88 of the free pa88 or frankingprivilege. there are restrictions. A8 to others,however, Among the exaeptlonelisted under said Article 4006 are the following:

* United States Marshals and no more than two of the'dip;tlee

of each such marshal; State rangers; the AdJutant General and A8eietantAdjutant General of this State; member8 of the State militia in uniform and when called into the service of the State; sheriffsand no more than two of their deputies; constablesand no more than two of their deputiee;chiM?sof police or city marshals, whether elected or appointed;members of the Livestock Sanitary Commieeionof Texas and their inepectors not to exceed twenty-fivein number for any one year; and any other.bonafide peace officer when hi8 duty Is tom execute criminalprocess;bona fide policemen or firemen in the eervioeof any city or town in Texas when such policemen or firemen are in the discharge of their public duty, but thle provision shall. not be conetrued 80 as to apply to persona holding comml8elone as specialpolicemen or firemen."
Members of the Texas Highway Patrol are not epeclfically named amongst the exceptions provided in Article 4006. A highway patrolmanbeing a peace officer,however, we think he could properly receive a pace and make uee of the same while engaged in the execution of criminalprocess.
.Youre very truly
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

GRL:N By (Signed:GLENN R. LEWIS Glenn R. Lewis Aee%etant

Approved Opinion Committee BY WC Chairman
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## SJI Funding Toolkit Launches Podcast Series

SJI’s Funding Toolkit for State Courts and Justice System Partners is designed to support local courts, state courts, and their justice system partners as they pursue federal and philanthropic funding opportunities.

The toolkit has a new virtual learning section that features webinars and podcasts designed to aid applicants in the grant process. The inaugural podcast in the Court ¢ents series features Jonathan Mattiello, Executive Director of SJI, discussing SJI’s funding opportunities.

Or follow SJI on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn and look for the Court ¢ents icon highlighting the latest posting. Send your funding and grant questions, as well as your ideas for topics to address with webinars and podcasts to fundingtoolkit@sji.gov.

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
APPROVED RESOLUTIONS OF THE

DECEMBER 13, 2010, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents and pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, approves up to a $9.5 million investment to exercise the contractual call option to

acquire an additional 20 percent equity interest in SI Networks L.L.C, the Smithsonian’s joint

venture with Showtime Networks Inc.  [2010.12.01]

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents and pursuant to

section 3.01 of the Bylaws of the Board of Regents, authorizes the Secretary to renew the lease

agreement for approximately 10,710 rentable square feet of administrative space for the

Magazine Division of Smithsonian Enterprises at 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10170.  

[2010.12.02]
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## Fair Housing Overview for State Courts Webinar

Register now! Fair Housing Overview for State Courts Webinar: Monday, May 9th at 3PM EST.

For over fifty years, the Fair Housing Act has protected individuals and families in the United States from housing discrimination. State court judges and subject matter experts at the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development will discuss fair housing protections, enforcement mechanisms, and implications for state courts.

Register here: Webinar Registration – Zoom

For more information: Webinar: Fair Housing Overview for State Courts | NCSC

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4832 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide student loan eligibility 

for mid-career, part-time students, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2014 

Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico (for herself and Mr. ENYART) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 

student loan eligibility for mid-career, part-time students, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Education for Jobs 

5 Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4832 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDENT LOAN ELIGIBILITY FOR MID-CAREER 

2 PART-TIME STUDENTS. 

3 (a) STUDENT ELIGIBILITY.—Section 484(b) of the 

4 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating paragraph (5) as para7 graph (6); and 

8 (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(5) A student who— 

11 ‘‘(A) is carrying at least 3 credit hours or the 

12 equivalent coursework for the course of study that 

13 the student is pursuing, as determined by the eligi14 ble institution, 

15 ‘‘(B) is enrolled in a course of study necessary 

16 for enrollment in a program leading to a degree or 

17 certificate, and 

18 ‘‘(C) was employed on a full-time basis for not 

19 less than 10 years, 

20 shall be, notwithstanding paragraph (1) of subsection (a), 

21 eligible to apply for loans under part D of this title.’’. 

22 (b) ANNUAL AND AGGREGATE LOAN LIMITS.—Sec23 tion 428(b)(1)(A) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

24 (20 U.S.C. 1078(b)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or 

25 meets the requirements of section 484(b)(5)’’ after ‘‘insti26 tution)’’. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4832 IH

1 (c) REPAYMENT PERIOD.— 

2 (1) STAFFORD LOANS.—Section 428(b)(7)(A) 

3 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

4 1078(b)(7)(A)) is amended by inserting before the 

5 period at the end the following: ‘‘or, in the case of 

6 a student described in section 484(b)(5), the day 

7 after 6 months after the date such student ceases to 

8 meet the requirements of such section’’. 

9 (2) PLUS LOANS.—Section 428B(d)(1)(B)(ii) 

10 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

11 1078–2(d)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by inserting before 

12 the period at the end the following: ‘‘or, in the case 

13 of a graduate or professional student borrower de14 scribed in section 484(b)(5), during the 6-month pe15 riod beginning on the day after the date such stu16 dent ceases to meet the requirements of such sec17 tion’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Rebecca Latimer Felton: A Featured Biography

**

----

The first woman to serve in the United States Senate, Rebecca Latimer Felton (1835–1930) of Georgia was appointed to fill a vacancy on October 3, 1922. She took the oath of office on November 21, 1922, and served only 24 hours while the Senate was in session. The 87-year-old Felton's largely symbolic Senate service capped a long career in Georgia politics and journalism. When her husband, William Harrell Felton, served in the state legislature and the U.S. House of Representatives, she worked as his campaign manager, press secretary, and often his political surrogate. As she fought for temperance, populist agrarian reforms, and woman suffrage, fully embracing equality of the sexes, she was also an outspoken white supremacist and advocate of segregation. Beginning in 1899 and continuing for more than 20 years, Felton wrote a popular column for the *Atlanta Semi-Weekly Journal*, dispensing advice on everything from child-rearing to farming to voting. In her only Senate speech, delivered to a large audience in the Senate Chamber, Felton concluded with the following prediction: "When the women of the country come in and sit with you...you will get ability, you will get integrity of purpose, you will get exalted patriotism, and you will get unstinted usefulness."

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
#### Moncure Robinson v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company.

Motion granted, question certified as stated in order.
#### John W. Whelan and Others, as Trustees in Bankruptcy of E. Reboulin Fils & Co., Inc., Appellants, v. Henry Goldman and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Goldman, Sachs & Company, and Others, Impleaded with James Talcott, Respondent, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.