alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Northern District of California

In re: ) Bankruptcy No.: 19-30088-DM-11

PG&E Corporation and ) R.S. No.: MF-1

Pacific Gas and Electric Company ) Hearing Date: June 11, 2019

) Time: 9:30 a.m.

Debtor(s) )

__________________________________________ )

 

 Relief From Stay Cover Sheet

Instructions: Complete caption and Section A for all motions. Complete Section B for mobile homes, motor vehicles, and personal 

property. Complete Section C for real property. Utilize Section C as necessary. If moving party is not a secured creditor, briefly 

summarize the nature of the motion in Section D.

(A) Date Petition Filed: January 29, 2019 Chapter: 11

Prior hearings on this obligation: None Last Day to File §523/§727 Complaints: Pending

(B) Description of personal property collateral (e.g. 1983 Ford Taurus):

 Secured Creditor [ ] or lessor [ ]

 Fair market value: $ ___ Source of value: ______________________________________ 

 Contract Balance: $___________________ Pre-Petition Default: $ _________________________________

 Monthly Payment: $___________________ No. of months: _________________________

 Insurance Advance: $ _ Post-Petition Default: $ __ _____ 

No. of months: _________________________

(C) Description of real property collateral (e.g. Single family residence, Oakland, CA):

Fair market value: $ Source of value: If appraisal, date: ________________________ 

Moving Party's position (first trust deed, second, abstract, etc.):

Approx. Bal. $____________________________ Pre-Petition Default: $__________________________________

As of (date): ____ No. of months: ________________________________ 

Mo. payment: $___________________________ Post-Petition Default: $_________________________________

Notice of Default (date): _____ No. of months: 

Notice of Trustee's Sale:_____________________ Advances Senior Liens: $_______________________________

Specify name and status of other liens and encumbrances, if known (e.g. trust deeds, tax liens, etc.):

Position Amount Mo. Payment Defaults

1st Trust Deed:_________________________ $ $ $

2nd Trust Deed: ________________________

_____________________________________:

_____________________________________:

_____________________________________:

$ $ $

(Total) $ $ $

Other pertinent information: Relief from stay sought for cause to liquidate claims asserted in an action pending before the Superior 

Court of California in and for the County of Alameda styled Wendy Nathan v. Ann D. Grcevich, Successor Trustee of the Survivor’s 

Trust, Grcevich Trust dated June 7, 1991; Jane Inok Hong; and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. (Case No. RG17873549). The 

claims are subject to permissive and mandatory abstention under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c).

Dated: May 16, 2019 /s/ Matthew J. Olson

Matthew J. Olson,

Attorney for WENDY NATHAN

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2048-1 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:01:38 Page 1

of 1
##### 



(Abitibi Logo)
    

(Bowater Logo)
 Abitibi-Consolidated and Bowater Amend Combination Agreement
 MONTRÉAL, QUÉBEC and GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA, May 8, 2007
   About Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.
 About Bowater Incorporated




---



##### 



ContactsInvestors:
    
    Investors:Abitibi-Consolidated
    
    BowaterFrancesco Alessi
    
    Duane A. OwensVice-President, Investor Relations and
Taxation
    
    Vice President and Treasurer(514) 394-2341
    
    (864) 282-9488falessi@abitibiconsolidated.comMedia:
    
    Media:Abitibi-Consolidated
    
    BowaterDenis Leclerc
    
    Jim Barron/Dan Gagnier/Kara FindlayDirector, Public Affairs
    
    Sard Verbinnen & Co(514) 394-3601
    
    (212) 687-8080denis_leclerc@abitibiconsolidated.com
 Forward-Looking Statements




---



##### 



Additional Information and Where to Find It
  Participants in the Solicitation
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2159 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:57:16 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2159 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:57:16 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2159 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:57:16 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2159 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:57:16 Page 4 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2051 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:06:41 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2051 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:06:41 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2051 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:06:41 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2051 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/16/19 14:06:41 Page 4 of

4
<PAGE>   1
SIBIA Neurosciences, Inc.
Exhibit 11.1 - Statement Re: Computation of (Loss) Income Per Share

<TABLE>
                                                                    Year Ended
                                                                   December 31,

                                                              1995              1996
                                                          ------------      ------------
<S>                                                       <C>               <C>
Primary Income (Loss) Per Share:

Weighted average common shares outstanding                  4,893,091         7,596,380

Cheap stock (1):
 Exercised options                                            247,746
 Option grants                                                343,434
Common stock equivalents (2)                                1,444,052
                                                          ------------      ------------

Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding                       6,928,323         7,596,380
                                                          ============      ============

Net income (loss)                                          $2,926,000       $(5,564,000)
                                                          ============      ============

Primary net income (loss) per common share                 $     0.42        $    (0.73)
                                                          ============      ============


Fully Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share:

Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding per primary share computation                  6,928,323         7,596,380

Incremental effect of outstanding options on a
 fully dilutive basis (3)                                     139,797                 -
                                                          ------------      ------------

Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares as adjusted                       7,068,120         7,596,380
                                                          ============      ============

Net income (loss)                                          $2,926,000       $(5,564,000)
                                                          ============      ============

Fully diluted net income (loss) per common share           $     0.41        $    (0.73)
                                                          ============      ============
</TABLE>


(1) In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
    Bulletin No. 83, certain equity securities issued within one year of an
    offering at less than the offering price are included as outstanding for
    1995 for the purposes of the net income per share computations. Such
    securities consist of common stock and stock options computed using the
    treasury stock method

(2) Includes the assumed conversion of the series A, B, and C Convertible
    Preferred Stock and dilutive stock options.

(3) In 1996 such amounts are excluded from the calculation as they are
    antidilutive.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4936 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4936

To amend section 292 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to require 
    the Attorney General to appoint counsel for unaccompanied alien 
  children and aliens with serious mental disabilities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2014

Mr. Jeffries (for himself, Ms. Bass, Mr. Deutch, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. 
   Gutierrez, Ms. Chu, Ms. DelBene, and Mr. O'Rourke) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 292 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to require 
    the Attorney General to appoint counsel for unaccompanied alien 
  children and aliens with serious mental disabilities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vulnerable Immigrant Voice Act''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IN CERTAIN CASES.

    (a) Appointment of Counsel for Unaccompanied Alien Children and 
Aliens With a Serious Mental Disability.--Section 292 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1362) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``In any'';
            (2) by striking ``(at no expense to the Government)'';
            (3) by striking ``he shall'' and inserting ``the person 
        shall''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Except as provided in subsection (c), the Government is not 
required to provide counsel to aliens under subsection (a).
    ``(c) Notwithstanding subsection (b), the Attorney General shall 
appoint counsel, at the expense of the Government if necessary (to the 
extent provided in appropriations Acts), to represent an alien in a 
removal proceeding who--
            ``(1) has been determined by the Secretary to be an 
        unaccompanied alien child (as defined in section 462 of the 
        Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g))); or
            ``(2) is incompetent to represent himself or herself due to 
        a serious mental disability that would be included in section 
        3(1) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 
        12102(1)).''.
    (b) Funding.--There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as 
may be necessary to carry out the amendments made by this section.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,054
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,667
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,515
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             207
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               210
<LOANS>                                         42,715
<ALLOWANCE>                                        309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,696
<DEPOSITS>                                      35,529
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,166
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  51,696
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,484
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  352
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    94
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,930
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,899
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,031
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       70
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  43
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    480
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         480
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       273
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.32
<LOANS-NON>                                        228
<LOANS-PAST>                                       168
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   394
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      181
<RECOVERIES>                                        26
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  309
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               309
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
10.1

       

      First
Amendment to the

      EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT

      


       

      This
First Amendment (the “Amendment”), is made as of the 16th day of June, 2009, to
the Employment Agreement by and between Arbinet-thexchange, Inc. a Delaware
corporation with its headquarters located in New Brunswick, New Jersey (the
“Employer”), and Shawn F. O’Donnell (the “Executive”) made as of
September 2, 2008 (the “Agreement”).  In consideration of
the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment, the Employer and the Executive
desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement as follows:

       

      1.           Section
3(d) is amended by deleting it in its entirety and substituting therefor the
following:

       

                                   
(a)           The
Executive shall maintain a permanent residence in the New Jersey area no later
than July 1, 2010.

       

      2.           Section
4(e)(iii)(B) is amended by deleting it in its entirety and substituting therefor
the following:

       

                                   
(B)          After the
Transition Period and until the earlier of July 1, 2010 or the
Executive’s relocation to the New Jersey area, the Executive shall be entitled
to reimbursement by the Employer for up to Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars
($6,500) per month of the Executive’s reasonable and documented out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by him for living expenses in the New Jersey area and travel
to and from the Executive’s residence in the Dallas, Texas area.

       

      3.             Section
6(a)(iv) is amended by deleting it in its entirety and substituting therefor the
following:

       

                                   
(iv)           the
Executive’s failure to maintain a permanent residence in the New Jersey area by
no later than July 1, 2010; or

       

      4.           Except
as specifically amended by the Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.

       

      5.           This
Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so
executed and delivered shall be taken to be an original; but such counterparts
shall together constitute one and the same document.

       

      *remainder
of page has intentionally been left blank*


      
        
           


        

        
           


          
            

          

        

        
           


        

      


      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement has been
executed as a sealed instrument by the Employer, by the undersigned duly
authorized director, and by the Executive, as of the date set forth
above.

       

      
        
          	 	
                  ARBINET-THEXCHANGE,
      INC.

                	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
                  By:
      

                	/s/ John
      B. Penney	 
	 	      
                  Name:
      John B. Penney

                	 
	 	      
                  Title:
      Director

                	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/
      Shawn F. O’Donnell	 
	 	Shawn
      F. O’Donnell
Hon., Gordon C, Cass 

County Attorney 

Iampasas, Texas 

Rer IWe of a pickup licensed with a 

farm license tag. 

Your question as to whether a farmer can take his 

family to church In his Ford pickup, licensed with a:Sarm 

license tag, and not violate the law, has been received bf " 

this department. (5 ,: ,' 

We believe that the IntentIon of the Legislatures, .:,' 

ia passing section 6a OS article 667% of~our atatutth was ~‘~ 

to lessen the burden upon the farmer of operatit&“a mototi 

vehicle that he uses for' farm purposes. In order to lessen 

that burden the Legislature provided that the farmer might 

obtain a license tax, known as a Sarm llcease for SISty 

percent (SO$) of the regular commercial license S&e, 

The Legislature named certain specific purposes 

for which a farmer might use a car ,or other vehicle licensed 

with a farm tag, but they obviously could not name all of 

the particular fact situations that ml&t arise, that would 

entitle the farmer to we the car bearing such a license 

tag. An examlnatl.on of'the statute reveals to us an IntentIon 

that the Sarmer with a vehicle bearing such a license might 

use our roads and highways for such purpose6 as were necessary 

and incidental to the operation of his farm. Most assuredly, 

the Legislature knew that the average farmer in Texas could 

not aSSord one vehicle to be used for farm purposes aud 

another Sunday car that he could use only on Sunday to take 

his family to church. In our .opiaion the Legislature contemplated that the farmer might use such vehicle to uarry his 

SzaUyto church on Sunday, if he so desired. 

We think that It would be a harsh and unsound 

construction of this article to hold that the vehicle licensed 

with a farm tag must not be used for any other purpose than 
Hon. oordon C. Cass, May 4, 1939, Page 2 (O-706) 

that specifically uamed in the statute. So long as the Sarmer dO8S note abuse the privilege, created by the exemption 

provided for In sectj.on 6a of article 6675a, he may use his 

automobile or vehicle to take his SamIly to church. 

In oti opinion the Sarmer that uses his motor vehicle regularly and continuously for farm purposes as outlined in our statutes, and on Sunday takes his family to 

church or drives to a neighbor's house, he may.do so without 

violating article 6673, sectton 68. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORHl$ST GRHERA$ OF TEXAS 

HIit Omb~: jl, 

APPROVED: /a/ H.Q.B. 

.' 

BY /a/ Morris Hodges 

Worrls Hodzeg 

Ass.Istant 

Gerald 6. &la& : 

ATTORREY fSMERl& OF,TEXAS
1

ny-1588541

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

M

orriso

n

&

F

o

erster L

L

P

4

2

5

M

ark

et Stre

et

S

a

n

Fra

n

cisc

o, C

A

9

410

5

Schedule 1

Retention Checklist

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2194-1 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 17:42:12 Page 1

of 3
2

ny-1588541

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105

 Debtors

 Affiliates and Subsidiaries

 Bank Accounts

 Bankruptcy Judges & Staff Northern District of California

 Current Officers and Directors

 Term and Revolving Loan Lenders and Administrative Agents

 Contract Counterparties (includes PPAs, patents and IP)

 Debtors’ Professionals (law firms, accountants and other professionals)

 Former Officers and Directors (since 2008)

 Affiliations of Former Officers

 Affiliations of Former Directors

 Insurance/Insurance Provider/Surety Bonds

 Surety Bonds

 Landlords and parties to leases

 Lenders (Prepetition and Proposed Post-petition to the extent not already listed)

 LITIGATION COUNTERPARTIES / LITIGATION PENDING LAWSUITS –

includes threatened litigation

 Litigation Parties (in adversary proceeding 19-03003)

 Ad Hoc Committee of Unsecured Tort Claimant Creditors

 Non-Debtors Professionals

 Ordinary Course Professionals

 Letters of Credit

 Regulatory and Government (Federal, State and Local)

 DIP Lenders

 Significant Competitors

 Significant Shareholders (more than 5% of equity)

 Significant holder of voting securities

 Taxing Authorities (Federal, State, and Local; trust fund, use property, franchise,

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2194-1 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 17:42:12 Page 2

of 3
3

ny-1588541

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105

sales)

 Top Unsecured Creditors

 Unsecured Notes

 UCC Lien Holders

 Unions

 Office of the United States Trustee for Region 17

 Utility Providers

 Vendors/Suppliers (critical, foreign, common carrier, shippers, warehousemen,

customs duties, brokers charges, facilities provider and third party)

 Interested Parties / Notice of Appearance Parties

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2194-1 Filed: 05/22/19 Entered: 05/22/19 17:42:12 Page 3

of 3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29561-29567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0004]
[FDA 225-09-0012]


Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug 
Administration and Drugs.Com

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

[[Page 29562]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and Drugs.Com. The 
purpose of the MOU is to extend the reach of FDA Consumer Health 
Information and to provide consumers with better information and timely 
content concerning public health and safety topics, including alerts of 
emerging safety issues and product recalls.

DATES: The agreement became effective May 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Brodsky, Consumer Health 
Information Staff, Office of External Relations, Food and Drug 
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 5378, Silver 
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-8234, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#256f44564a4b0b67574a41564e5c654341440b4d4d560b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d993b8aab6b7f79babb6bdaab2a099bfbdb8f7b1b1aaf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others 
shall be published in the Federal Register, the agency is publishing 
notice of this MOU.

    Dated: May 17, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.


[[Page 29563]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MY10.008


[[Page 29564]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MY10.009


[[Page 29565]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MY10.010


[[Page 29566]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26MY10.011

[FR Doc. 2010-12638 Filed 5-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>