alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. DALTON TAYLOR.

(Filed 7 April, 1954.)

1. Criminal Law § Sic: Appeal and Error § 24—

As a general rule only assignments of errors supported by exceptions duly and timely noted will be considered on appeal.

2. Criminal Law § 81c (2): Appeal and Error § 39f—

Exceptions to tbe charge cannot be sustained when the charge construed contextually is without prejudicial error.

Appeal by defendant from *Grady, Emergency Judge,*September Term, 1953, of LeNoir.

Tbis defendant was tried and convicted in tbe Municipal-County Court of Kinston and Lenoir County upon a warrant charging him with driving a motor vehicle upon the public roads while under the influence of intoxicating liquors, opiates, or narcotic drugs. From the judgment imposed he appealed to the Superior Court where he was tried *de novo*on the original warrant, and again convicted. He now appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court, assigning error.

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Love for the State.*

*LaRoque, Allen & Parrott for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant assigns as error certain portions of the charge. However, no exceptions were taken to such portions of the charge upon which an assignment of error may rest.

It is the general rule that assignments of error not supported by exceptions duly and timely noted, will not be considered upon appeal. *S. v. Oliver,*213 N.C. 386, 196 S.E. 325; *In re Will of Beard,*202 N.C. 661, 163 S.E. 748; *Dixon v. Osborne,*201 N.C. 489, 160 S.E. 579. For exceptions to this rule see *S. v. Dockery,*238 N.C. 222, 77 S.E. 2d 664, and *S. v. Parnell,*214 N.C. 467, 199 S.E. 601.

The instant case, however, does not fall within an exception to the general rule. Even so, the charge, when considered contextually, as it must be, was in substantial compliance with our decisions in *S. v. Carroll,*226 N.C. 237, 37 S.E. 2d 688; *S. v. Bowen,*226 N.C. 601, 39 S.E. 2d 740, and *S. v. Lee,*237 N.C. 263, 74 S.E. 2d 654.

No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Gabriel Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Keith R. Feilmeier, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gabriel Technologies Corporation, and will be retained by Gabriel Technologies Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/   Keith R. Feilmeier

Keith R. Feilmeier, Chief Executive Officer,

President, Director and Principal Executive

Officer

Date:  December 13, 2004
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12188 and #12189]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1916-DR), dated 05/14/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         05/01/2010 through 05/02/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         05/14/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/13/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/14/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/14/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Alcorn, Benton, Prentiss, Tippah, Tishomingo. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*( print page 29371)Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12188B and for economic injury is 12189B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-12465 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# IN THE SUPREME COURT O F TEX AS

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 

### N O 

### . 10-0928

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 

## R A U L 

## E R N E S T O 

## L O A IS IG A 

## , M
. D
. , A N D 

## R A U L 

## E R N E S T O 

## L O A IS IG A 

## , M
. D
. , P
. A
. , P E T IT IO N E R S 

## ,

v . 

## G U A D A L U P E 

## C E R D A 

## , I N D IV ID U A L L Y A N D A S 

## N E X T 

## F R IE N D O F 

## M A R IS S A 

## C E R D A 

## , A



## M IN O R 

## , A N D 

## C IN D Y 

## V E L E Z 

## , R E S P O N D E N T S

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4



### O N 

### P E T I T I O N F O R 

### R E V I E W F R O M T H E 

### C O U R T O F 

### A P P E A L S F O R T H E 

### T H I R T E E N T H 

### D I S T R I C T O F 

### T E X A S

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4


### J U S T I C E 

### W I L L E T T 

### , concur ring in part and dissenting in part. I join today ’s well-r easone d decision save one quibbl e: Beca use I find Parts V.B and VI .B of the Court’s opinion advisory —and thus inadvisable—I respe ctfully dissent from those sections. Today the Court c larifies the standard for defining a healthca re liability claim (HCL C) and
rema nds so the trial court can apply our new g uidance
. So far so g ood. If the trial court conclude s these claims are not HCL Cs, then no expert repor t is necessa

ry . The Court, howeve r, proceeds to (p)r eview the repor

ts’ sufficie ncy

just in case the tria l court g oes the other way . This analy sis is prema ture. The trial court hasn’t even appli ed o u r n ew test to deter mine whether these are HCL Cs in the first place
. I wouldn’t short-circ uit its review by pre- deciding an issue that might never need deciding at all and that might benef it i m mensely from lower- court analy sis.

### As a judiciary , our constitutional role dictates that we decide concr ete case s and not dispense

conting ent advice
. “[T] he judicial power does not embra ce the g iving of advisory opinions,” and 1 

### prudent development of the law require s that courts ref rain from specula ting on situations that may
never arise. The Court’s motivation, of course , is commendable : to advanc e judicial effi cienc y and squeeze out inordinate delay
. But unless and until the lower courts conclude that plaintiffs’ claims
are indeed HCL Cs, I would not sug g est a p rema ture prede cision that presuppose s—if not prede stines—a ce rtain lower -cour t path.

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Don R. Wi llett J ustice OP INION DELIVERED: Aug ust 31, 2012

F i r e m e n ’ s I

n s . C o . o f N e w a r k

, N

. J

. v . B u r c h , 4 4 2 S
. W
. 2 d 3 3 1 , 3 3 3 ( T e x . 1 9 6 8 )
. 1 2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 198 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:14:25 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 198 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:14:25 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 198 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:14:25 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4815 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4815

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to provide 
              career education pathways in manufacturing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2014

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to provide 
              career education pathways in manufacturing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Manufacturing Jobs for 
Students Act''.

SEC. 2. CAREER EDUCATION PATHWAYS.

    Section 5421 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 7245) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (B);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (C) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) significantly engage students, in a 
                coordinated effort with local manufacturing employers, 
                teachers, students, and parents, to promote careers in 
                the manufacturing field.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (K);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (L) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(M) provide students in grades 7 through 12 
                with--
                            ``(i) information on career and educational 
                        pathways leading to jobs and career 
                        opportunities in the labor markets of the 
                        geographic area of the local educational agency 
                        of the school, particularly in the 
                        manufacturing field; and
                            ``(ii) opportunities for interaction with 
                        employers of such labor markets, with 
                        preference given to employers in the 
                        manufacturing field, including opportunities to 
                        visit the workplaces of such employers to 
                        facilitate a greater understanding of the job 
                        requirements, job opportunities, and what the 
                        job entails.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated July 14, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of AdvanSource Biomaterials Corporation as of and for the year ended March 31, 2011, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-149341, 333-149342, 333-149343, 333-117594, 333-106607 and 333-05893), Form SB-2 (File No. 333-122123), Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-110779 and 333-72223), and Form S-4 (File No. 333-102115).














/s/ McGladrey & Pullen LLP




Boston, Massachusetts


July 14, 2011
#### JAMES McGIBBON AND JAMES McGIBBON, Jr., Respondents, *v.*WILLIAM SCHLESSINGER AND ADOLPHUS SCHLESSINGER, Appellants.

*A venden’ may resell, without notifying the vendee in default, of the time and place of the resale*— • *The resale need not he made at the place of delivery designated, in the contract.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

The action was brought to recover damages occasioned by the refusal of the defendants to receive and pay for eleven bales of hops, purchased by them, to be delivered at Malone.

On February ninth, the plaintiffs notified the defendants that the hops were at the depot at Malone, ready for delivery, and that, if the defendants did not comply with the terms of the contract before February fifteenth, the hops would be sold on their account. Subsequently, the hops were shipped to New York and sold, without notifying the defendants of the time and place of sale. The court, at General Term, said:

“It was not necessary for the plaintiffs to give the defendants notice of the time and place where the property would be sold on defendants’ account. Upon the refusal of the defendants to accept, the plaintiffs became the agents of the defendants to sell the property, so that the loss might be as small as possible. Notice of intention to sell, in case the contract is not performed, is all that the law requires. *(Dustan*v. *Me Andrew,*44 N. Y., 72; *Lewis*v. *Oreider,*49 Barb., 606; aff’d, 51N. Y., 231; *Pollen*v. *Le Roy,*30 N. Y., 549.)

“Nor was it necessary that the place of sale should be the place *226of delivery. *(Lewis*v. Ordder, *supra.)*The case of *McJHackron*v. *Bundles*(34 Barb., 301), holding a different doctrine, is not sustained by the authority cited *[Sands*v. Taylor, 5 Johns. B., 395), and is directly overruled by *Pollen*v. *Le Boy*(30 N. Y., 558), so far as it sustains appellants’ views.”

*Beman &*Brennan, for the appellants. *W. P. Oantwell,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.;

LearNed, P. J., and Bocees, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 1 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 2 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 3 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 4 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 5 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 6 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 7 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 8 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 9 of

10
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1688 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:26:58 Page 10

of 10
##### 



NS GROUP, INC.
    
    June 30, 2005             Form 10-Q
    
    Exhibit 12.1
 
 Three Months Ended
    
    Six Months Ended6/30/2005
    
    6/30/2004
    
    6/30/2005
    
    6/30/2004EarningsPretax income
    
    $
    40,298
    
    
    $
    21,322
    
    
    $
    63,005
    
    
    $
    26,466Interest expense
    
    
    176
    
    
    
    353
    
    
    
    335
    
    
    
    671Interest portion of rent expense (a)
    
    
    120
    
    
    
    117
    
    
    
    266
    
    
    
    229$
    40,594
    
    
    $
    21,792
    
    
    $
    63,606
    
    
    $
    27,366Fixed ChargesInterest expense
    
    $
    176
    
    
    $
    353
    
    
    $
    335
    
    
    $
    671Interest portion of rent expense (a)
    
    
    120
    
    
    
    117
    
    
    
    266
    
    
    
    229$
    296
    
    
    $
    470
    
    
    $
    601
    
    
    $
    900Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    137.1
    
    
    
    46.4
    
    
    
    105.8
    
    
    
    30.4
 
 (a)
    
    One-third of rent expense is the portion deemed representative of the interest factor.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,034
<PP&E>                                           4,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,021
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,431)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,880
<SALES>                                          8,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,982
<CGS>                                            3,542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    554
<INCOME-TAX>                                       124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            8
<NET-INCOME>                                       438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.01)



</TABLE>
|                                             |   | Jurisdiction      of  |   | %      of Voting        |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                             |   | Incorporation      or |   | Securities      held at |
| Name      of Corporation                         |   | Organization          |   | December      31, 2007  |
|                                             |   |                  |   |                    |
| Consolidated      subsidiaries:                  |   |                  |   |                    |
| Ti-Pro, LLC                                      |   | Nevada                |   |   82%         |
| TMCA International,      Inc.                    |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Bermuda      Limited                       |   | Bermuda               |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK Holding Company      Limited            |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| Loterios SpA                                     |   | Italy                 |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UKLimited                                  |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| Titanium MC    Limited                           |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK (Export)      Limited                   |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Europe      Limited                        |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Savoie,    SA                              |   | France                |   |         70%   |
| TIMET Germany,      GmbH                         |   | Germany               |   |  100%              |
| Titanium Hearth Technologies,      Inc.          |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Millbury      Corporation                  |   | Oregon                |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Castings      Corporation                  |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Finance Management      Company            |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK Finance Management      Company Limited |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK Finance Company      Limited            |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Real Estate      Corporation               |   | Colorado              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Asia, Inc.                                 |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
| 631996 N.B.    Limited                           |   | Canada                |   |  100%              |
|                                             |   |                  |   |                    |

----
Exhibit
10.2


 


EXHIBIT
A


 





	Date: 	3/10/l6	 




  







	NATURALNANO, INC.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Attn:	 


 


CONVERSION
NOTICE


 


The
above-captioned Holder hereby gives notice to NaturalNano, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), pursuant
to that certain Convertible Promissory Note made by the Company in favor of the Holder in the principal amount of $150,000 by
the Company (the “Note”); that the Holder elects to convert the portion of the Note balance set forth below
into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock of the Company as of the date of conversion specified below.


 


	A.	Date of conversion:	3/10/16	 
	B.	Conversion #:	 	 
	C.	Conversion Amount:	$5,500	 
	D.	Conversion Price:	$0.05	 
	E.	Conversion Shares:	110,000	 
	F.	Remaining Note Balance:	$114,500	 


 


Please transfer (he
Conversion Shares to the undersigned at:


 


	Address: 	 	 
	 	Marlin Capital Investments LLC	 
	 	555 S Federal Hwy #450	 
	 	Boca Raton FL 33432	 


 


	Sincerely,	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Barry Honig	 
	Name:	Barry Honig	 


 


DWAC Instruction:


Broker No 0283


Account No 11547350