alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 PACKETEER, INC.  STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 RECITALS
    NOW, THEREFORE
 Grant of Option
 Option Term
 Limited Transferability




---



##### 



Dates of Exercise
 Cessation of Service
  earlier
    2




---



##### 



Special Acceleration of Option
   provided
  Adjustment in Option Shares
 Stockholder Rights
 3




---



##### 



Manner of Exercising Option
          4




---



##### 



Compliance with Laws and Regulations
   Successors and Assigns
 Notices
 Financing
 5




---



##### 



Construction
 Governing Law
 Excess Shares
 Additional Terms Applicable to an Incentive Option
    6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



EXHIBIT I
NOTICE OF EXERCISE
 
  ,Date
 OptioneeAddress:Print name in exact manner it is to
appear on the stock certificate:Address to which certificate is to
be sent, if different from address
above:Social Security Number:




---



##### 



APPENDIX
  Agreement
 Board
 Common Stock
 Code
 Corporate Transaction
   Corporation
 Employee
 Exercise Date
 Exercise Price
 Expiration Date
 Fair Market Value
 A-1




---



##### 



Grant Date
 Grant Notice
 Incentive Option
 Misconduct
 Non-Statutory Option
 Notice of Exercise
 Option Shares
 A-2




---



##### 



Optionee
 Parent
 Permanent Disability
 Plan
 Plan Administrator
 Service
 Stock Exchange
 Subsidiary
 A-3
#### Borough Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent, v. Cresco Realty Company and Walter L. Johnson, Impleaded with Edward J. McLaughlin, Appellant.

No sufficient reason appears why the officers of the plaintiff should not. be examined before trial. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and order for examination reinstated.

Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., dissented solely upon the ground that the testimony sought would be inadmissible upon the trial. *(Jamestown Business College Assn.*v. Allen, 172 N. Y. 291.)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-35257, 333-35259, 333-38657, 333-38659, 333-
59783 and 333-59797) and in the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-61005) of Peritus Software Services, Inc. of our
report dated February 18, 1999, except as to Note 1 and the last sentence of
Note 15, which are as of April 2, 1999, appearing on page 47 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
April 15, 1999
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Geospatial Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Thomas R. Oxenreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  |  |    
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas R. Oxenreiter
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                    |  | Thomas R. Oxenreiter   
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4942 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the number of graduate 

medical education residency positions at hospitals administered by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2014 

Ms. TITUS (for herself, Mr. O’ROURKE, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. KUSTER, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. RUIZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

number of graduate medical education residency positions at hospitals administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Underserved Veterans 

5 Access to Health Care Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4942 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION 

2 RESIDENCY POSITIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7302 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new subsection: 

6 ‘‘(e)(1) In carrying out this section, the Secretary 

7 shall establish medical residency programs, or ensure a 

8 sufficient number of residency positions in medical resi9 dency programs, at medical facilities of the Department 

10 that the Secretary determines— 

11 ‘‘(A) are experiencing a shortage of physicians; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(B) are located in communities that are des14 ignated as a health professional shortage area (as 

15 defined in section 332 of the Public Health Service 

16 Act (42 U.S.C. 254e)). 

17 ‘‘(2) In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary 

18 shall— 

19 ‘‘(A) determine the specialty of health care pro20 fessionals that a location is experiencing a shortage 

21 of, including with respect to primary care and men22 tal health; 

23 ‘‘(B) allocate the residency positions under 

24 paragraph (1) based on such determination; and 

25 ‘‘(C) notify Congress of the information used by 

26 the Secretary to make such determination.’’. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4942 IH

1 (b) FIVE-YEAR GOAL.—During the five-year period 

2 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

3 Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish not fewer 

4 than 2,000 graduate medical education residency positions 

5 pursuant to section 7302(e) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, as added by subsection (a). In establishing such po7 sitions, the Secretary shall give priority to medical facili8 ties of the Department of Veterans Affairs that— 

9 (1) as of the date of the enactment of this Act, 

10 do not have medical residency programs; and 

11 (2) are located in communities that have a high 

12 concentration of veterans. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 10.48
 PLEDGE, ASSIGNMENT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 th
 RECITALS
       AGREEMENTS
  SECURITY




---



##### 



The Stock Collateral.
       Rights of Administrative Agent in the Stock Collateral.
  Rights of Pledgor in the Stock Collateral.
  2




---



##### 



REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
  Stock Interests.
  Power and Authority.
  Binding Agreements.
  No Conflicts.
 provided however
 3




---



##### 



Compliance with Laws.
  Title to Properties.
  Perfection and Priority of Stock Collateral.
  COVENANTS
  Corporate Existence.
  Delivery of Stock Collateral.
  4




---



##### 



Defense of Title and Further Assurances.
  Compliance with Laws.
  Protection of Stock Collateral.
  Certain Notices.
  5




---



##### 



Books and Records; Information.
   Disposition of Stock Collateral.
  Distributions.
  Liens.
  Survival.
  DEFAULT AND RIGHTS AND REMEDIES
 Events of Default.
  6




---



##### 



Default under Credit Agreement.
  Default under this Agreement.
  Breach of Representations and Warranties.
  Failure to Comply with Covenants.
  Remedies.
  Uniform Commercial Code.
  Sale or Other Disposition of Stock Collateral.
  7




---



##### 



Specific Rights With Regard to Stock Collateral.
     8




---



##### 



Application of Proceeds.
  Performance by Administrative Agent.
  9




---



##### 



Other Remedies.
  Costs and Expenses.
  Receipt Sufficient Discharge to Purchaser.
  Remedies, etc. Cumulative.
  No Waiver, etc.
  10




---



##### 



MISCELLANEOUS
 Notices.
  Amendments; Waivers.
  Cumulative Remedies.
      11




---



##### 



Severability.
      Successors and Assigns.
  Applicable Law; Jurisdiction.
 Applicable Law.
  Submission to Jurisdiction.
  12




---



##### 



Headings.
  Entire Agreement.
  Waiver of Trial by Jury.
 PLEDGOR AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT HEREBY JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY WAIVE TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
ACTION OR PROCEEDING TO WHICH BORROWER AND AGENT MAY BE PARTIES, ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY
PERTAINING TO (A) THIS AGREEMENT, (B) ANY OF THE LOAN DOCUMENTS, OR (C) THE STOCK COLLATERAL. THIS
WAIVER CONSTITUTES A WAIVER OF TRIAL BY JURY OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ALL PARTIES TO SUCH ACTIONS OR
PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING CLAIMS AGAINST PARTIES WHO ARE NOT PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT.
  Liability of Administrative Agent.
  13




---



##### 



WITNESS:
    
    
    
    SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING SERVICES, INC./s/ James S. Pope
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Daniel Schwartz
    
    (SEAL)Name:
    
    Daniel SchwartzTitle:
    
    President
 14




---



##### 



IRREVOCABLE STOCK POWER
  
  
 SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING SERVICES, INC.Dated:
    
    2-14-08
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Daniel SchwartzName: Daniel SchwartzTitle: President
 15
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES

TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED S.D, MOTHER OF B.R. AND

J.R., CHILDREN,

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-2948 

LT Case No. 2019-DP-000051-O 

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 2, 2022 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County, 

A. James Craner, Judge.

David J. Joffe, of Joffe Law, P.A., 

Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellant. 

Ward L. Metzger, of Children's Legal 

Services, Tallahassee, and Kelley 

Schaeffer, of Children's Legal Services, 

Bradenton, for Appellee, Department of 

Children and Families. 

 

Elise M. Ezzo, of OCBA Legal Aid 

Society, Windermere, for Guardian 

ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EVANDER, COHEN and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.01**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-99777and Form S-3 No. 33-99777-01) of Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership and CrescentFinance Company of our reports dated March 9, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedules of Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership, Crescent Real EstateEquities Limited Partnership management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CrescentReal Estate Equities Limited Partnership included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2005.     ERNST & YOUNG LLPDallas, Texas
**Exhibit
        31.2**
  I,
        Bud
        Najvar, certify that:
  1.  I
        have
        reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Forster Drilling Corporation;
  2.  Based
        on
        my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
        fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
        in
        light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
        with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based
        on
        my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
        in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
        results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
        periods presented in this report;
  4.  The
        registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
        and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
        Act
        Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a.  Designed
        such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
        and
        procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
        information relating to registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
        is
        made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
        period
        in which this report is being prepared;
  b.  Evaluated
        the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
        presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
        disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
        this
        report based on such evaluation; and
  c.  Disclosed
        in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
        reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
        has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
        registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The
        registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
        recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
        registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
        directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a.  All
        significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
        of
        internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
        adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
        report financial information; and
  b.  Any
        fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
        who
        have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
        reporting.
  Date:
        July 24, 2006
 
 /s/
        Bud Najvar
 Bud
        Najvar, Chief Financial Officer
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2188    Filed: 05/22/19    Entered: 05/22/19 12:45:18    Page 1 of1
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 1 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1685 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:23:25 Page 9 of

9
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 27, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-571 Lower Tribunal No. 17-1186

________________ 

### Madelyn Valdes Roman ,

Appellant,
vs. 

### In Re: Estate of Maria M. Ignarra ,

Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge. Madelyn Valdes Roman, in proper person. Paul M. Cowan & Associates, P.A., and Paul M. Cowan, Anthony M. Diblasi and Manuel A. Celaya, for appellee. Before EMAS, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. Swartz v. Russell, 481 So. 2d 64, 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (“[T]he circuit court, in its probate capacity, [has] jurisdiction to determine the right of possession of real property in matters relating to the settlement of the estates of decedents. Consequently, the probate court has jurisdiction to handle the dispute over the right to possession of the estate’s real property.”).
#### Valentine Cromwell v. Charles H. Clement.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs and! disbursements.—

*604Dykman, J.:

This is an application on the part of the defendant for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the judgment of the General Term of this court, reversing the judgment of the Special Term which sustained a demurrer to the complaint in this action. The motion is based upon an affidavit of the attorney for the defendant, which states that the defendant desires to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the judgment of the General Term. The affidavit states no reason why such permission should be granted, and we have been unable to discover any. According to the complaint the defendant has been guilty of a gross fraud, and he should not be permitted to delay the day of trial by technical objections to the complaint. If he has any defense he had better address himself to its production, and if he has none, there shouldbe no delay of the day of judgment. The motion should be denied, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Brown, P. J. and Pratt, J., concurred.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                  Computation of Pro Forma Net Loss Per Share
                     (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Actual weighted shares:                                           1996 (1)                    1995 (1)
         <S>                                                          <C>                       <C>
         Series A preferred stock                                             748                    1,919
         Series B preferred stock                                           1,215                    3,114
         Common stock                                                       6,785                    1,746

         Dilutive Employee stock options and warrants                         614                      884
         Warrants                                                              69                        4
                                                                      -----------               ----------

         Total common and common equivalent shares                          9,431                    7,667
                                                                      ===========               ==========

         Net loss                                                     $   (4,573)               $  (9,324)
                                                                      ===========               ==========

         Pro Forma Net loss per share                                $     (0.48)              $    (1.22)
                                                                      ============              ==========
</TABLE>

        (1) See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Footstar, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-20731, No. 333-30011 and No. 333-41390) on Form S-8 of Footstar, Inc. ("the
Company") of our reports dated August 26, 2005 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, the related financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 1,
2005, which reports appear in the January 1, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our report on the consolidated financial statements dated August 26, 2005,
contains an explanatory paragraph that states that:

     -    On March 2, 2004, the Company filed voluntary petitions for
          reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This
          filing for reorganization raises substantial doubt about the Company's
          ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
          not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
          uncertainty.


/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.
Edison, New Jersey
September 28, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter
Brocklesby,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                         /s/ PETER BROCKLESBY
                         --------------------
                         Peter Brocklesby
                         President (Principal Executive Officer)
                         August 15, 2005
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oxford ResidentialProperties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chiefexecutive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalentof the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.