alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1




                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

              [CASTAING HUSSEY LOLAN & DAUTERIVE, LLP LETTERHEAD]



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-64213 and 333-10647) of our report dated January 29, 
1999 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acadiana Bancshares, Inc. 
and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 1998.


/s/ CASTAING, HUSSEY, LOLAN & DAUTERIVE, LLP
New Iberia, Louisiana
March 29, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7022]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

A determination has been made, pursuant to Section 6 of Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, as amended, to remove nonproliferation measures on two Russian entities.

# DATES: 

*Effective Date:*                         May 21, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pamela K. Durham, Office of Missile Threat Reduction, Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-647-4930).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Pursuant to the authorities vested in the President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) (“IEEPA”), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601*et seq.*), the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751*et seq.*), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and Section 6 of Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, as amended, a determination was made on May 12, 2010, that it is in the foreign policy or national security interests of the United States to remove the restrictions imposed pursuant to Sections 4(b), 4(c), and 4(d) of the Executive Order on the following Russian entities, their sub-units and successors:                

1. D. Mendeleyev University of Chemical Technology of Russia

2. Moscow Aviation Institute

                    These restrictions were imposed on January 8, 1999 (                    *see*64 FR 2935).                

Dated: May 17, 2010.

C.S. Eliot Kang,

Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2010-12313 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2015-Ohio-3828.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Plaintiff-Appellee, :

 CASE NO. 2015-T-0079

 - vs - :

LARRY SMITH, :

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2014 CR 00387. 

Judgment: Appeal dismissed. 

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 

160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH 44481 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). 

Larry Smith, pro se, PID: A671-308, Lorain Correctional Institution, 2075 South Avon 

Belden Road, Grafton, OH 44044 (Defendant-Appellant). 

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J. 

{¶1} On July 17, 2015, appellant, Larry Smith, pro se, filed a motion for leave to 

file a delayed appeal, pursuant to App.R. 5(A), with this court. No notice of appeal was 

filed with the trial court. It appears that appellant is appealing from the trial court’s May 

19, 2015 entry convicting him of attempted felonious assault and sentencing him to 

serve thirty-six months in prison. 

{¶2} No brief or response in opposition to the motion for leave has been filed. 

{¶3} App.R. 5(A) provides: 
2

{¶4} “After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the 

filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave 

of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: 

{¶5} “(a) Criminal proceedings; 

{¶6} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and 

{¶7} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings. 

{¶8} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals 

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of 

right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the 

trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of 

the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals. The movant also shall furnish an 

additional copy of the notice of appeal and a copy of the motion for leave to appeal to 

the clerk of the court of appeals who shall serve the notice of appeal and the motions 

upon the prosecuting attorney.” (Emphasis added.) 

{¶9} In the present case, appellant has not complied with App.R. 5(A) because 

he failed to file a notice of appeal in the trial court concurrently with the filing of his 

motion for leave to appeal. See State v. Fisher, 46 Ohio App.2d 279 (1975); State v. 

Pavisich, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2014-P-0028, 2014-Ohio-5313. Therefore, appellant’s 

present motion is procedurally defective, and he has failed to invoke this court’s 

jurisdiction. 

{¶10} We note that appellant is not barred from filing a new motion for leave to 

appeal along with a notice of appeal in accordance with the rules of court. 
3

{¶11} Accordingly, it is ordered that appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file a 

delayed appeal is hereby overruled. 

{¶12} Appeal dismissed. 

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J., concurs, 

DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., concurs in judgment only.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 27 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

GLORIA UVON ROBINSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

NEVILLE MASSIE,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 99-6014

(W. District of Oklahoma)

(D.C. No. 98-CV-1165-C)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This case is before the court on Gloria Uvon Robinson’s application for a

certificate of appealability (“COA”). Robinson seeks a COA so that she can
-2-

appeal the district court’s denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (providing that no appeal can be taken from a

“final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of

arises out of process issued by a state court” unless the petitioner first obtains a

certificate of appealability).

This court concludes that Robinson is not entitled to a COA. As noted by

the district court, Robinson’s § 2254 petition was clearly filed outside of the

outside of the one-year limitations period set out in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). 

Furthermore, the tolling provision set out in § 2244(d)(2) is not implicated in this

case because all of Robinson’s state post-conviction proceedings were filed after

the one-year limitations period set out in § 2244(d)(1) had already expired. 

Finally, this court agrees with the district court that neither Robinson’s pro se

status nor her lack of legal training, standing alone, is sufficient reason to

equitably toll § 2244(d)(1)’s limitations period.

The district court conclusion that Robinson’s petition is barred by the

statute of limitations is not debatable among jurists of reason, subject to a

different resolution on appeal, or deserving of further proceedings. See Barefoot

v. Estelle, 462 U.S. 880, 883 n.4 (1983). Thus, Robinson has not “made a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” and is not entitled to a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). For substantially those reasons
-3-

set out in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated October 23,

1998, and the district court’s Order dated December 3, 1998, this court denies

Robinson’s request for a COA and dismisses this appeal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12322]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7020]


Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation; 
Determination Under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Department of 
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Acts

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A decision has been made to remove the restrictions imposed on 
the Tula Instrument Design Bureau (KBP) and rescind Federal Register 
Notice 3039, from April 29, 1999.

DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Bachman, Office of Conventional 
Arms Threat Reduction, Bureau of International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-647-3937).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A decision was made on May 12, 2010, that it 
is in the foreign policy or national security interests of the United 
States to remove the restrictions imposed on the Tula Instrument Design 
Bureau (KBP) on April 29, 1999 under Federal Register notice 3039.

    Dated: May 17, 2010.
C.S. Eliot Kang,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-12322 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
B 2100A (Form 2100A) (12/15)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

__________ District Of __________

In re ________________________________, Case No. ________________

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). Transferee

hereby gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other

than for security, of the claim referenced in this evidence and notice.

______________________________________ ____________________________________

Name of Transferee Name of Transferor

Name and Address where notices to transferee Court Claim # (if known):

should be sent: Amount of Claim:

Date Claim Filed:

Phone: ______________________________ Phone:

Last Four Digits of Acct #: ______________ Last Four Digits of Acct. #: __________

Name and Address where transferee payments

should be sent (if different from above): 

Phone:

Last Four Digits of Acct #:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the

best of my knowledge and belief.

By:__________________________________ Date:____________________________

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Cohanzick Management LLC

427 Bedford Rd #230 Pleasantville, NY 10570

914-741-9600

507 Capital LLC C/o Thomas Braziel

228 Park Ave S #63787

New York, NY 10003-1502

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1639 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 07:21:51 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1639 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 07:21:51 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit B page 76 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 1

of 25
CONFORMED COP't 

Copy of Document Recorded or 

05/09/2019 02 4713 PM 

as 2019-04964 

Mendocino County Clerk-Recorder 

RECORDING REQUESTED B 

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL To: 

OTMK Law 

Attn: Kymberli Aguilar 

2500 Venture Oaks Way, Ste. 320 

Sacramento, CA 95833 

PARTIAL RELEASE OF MECHANIC'S LIEN 

Exhibit B page 77 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 2

of 25
Exhibit B page 78 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 3

of 25
Exhibit B page 79 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 4

of 25
Exhibit B page 80 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 5

of 25
Exhibit B page 81 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 6

of 25
Exhibit B page 82 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 7

of 25
Exhibit B page 83 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 8

of 25
Exhibit B page 84 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 9

of 25
Exhibit B page 85 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 10

of 25
Exhibit B page 86 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 11

of 25
Exhibit B page 87 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 12

of 25
Exhibit B page 88 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 13

of 25
Exhibit B page 89 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 14

of 25
Exhibit B page 90 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 15

of 25
Exhibit B page 91 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 16

of 25
Exhibit B page 92 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 17

of 25
Exhibit B page 93 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 18

of 25
Exhibit B page 94 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 19

of 25
Exhibit B page 95 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 20

of 25
Exhibit B page 96 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 21

of 25
Exhibit B page 97 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 22

of 25
Exhibit B page 98 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 23

of 25
Exhibit B page 99 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 24

of 25
Exhibit B page 100 of 166

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2073-5 Filed: 05/17/19 Entered: 05/17/19 15:12:07 Page 25

of 25
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PG&E Corporation ("Debtor")

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1936    Filed: 05/09/19    Entered: 05/09/19 07:41:20    Page 1 of1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,365,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (25,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,554,044
<PP&E>                                         209,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,853,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          390,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,818
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,457,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,853,759
<SALES>                                        362,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,848
<CGS>                                          796,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,935,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,573,013)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,437,357)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sal Giordano, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Three Month Report on Form 10-Q of Fedders Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

       a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
       to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
       its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
       entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
       prepared;

       b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
       and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
       the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and

       c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
       control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
       most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
       case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
       likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
       financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

       a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
       operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
       reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
       process, summarize and report financial information; and

       b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       control over financial reporting.


Date:  January 14, 2004


/s/  Sal Giordano, Jr.
-------------------------
Sal Giordano, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer

                                        24
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of CardioTech International, Inc., aMassachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric G. Walters, thechief financial officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
|                          |   | /s/ ERIC G. WALTERS                        |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Eric G. Walters,                           |
|                     |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: June 26, 2006 |   |                                       |

 

----