alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20016 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANDRES TONOC-CHAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-198-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Andres Tonoc-Chan appeals his sentence for transferring a false identification document which appeared to be issued under the authority of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(2). The district court did not clearly err in enhancing Tonoc-Chan’s base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L2.1(b)(2)(C) because the evidence supports a finding that Tonoc-Chan’s offense involved 103 sets of counterfeit documents.
See § 1B1.3(a); United States v. Salazar , 70 F.3d 351, 352 (5th Cir. 1995).No. -2-
AFFIRMED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROZALIA GELFENBOYM and BENTSION )

ZILBERSHTEYN, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4319

)

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST )

COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE )

HOLDERS OF NEW CENTURY HOME )

EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005-A, )

ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH )

CERTIFICATES, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Pamela A.M. Campbell, Judge.

Kelley A. Bosecker, St. Petersburg, for 

Appellants.

Mary J. Walter of Liebler Gonzalez &

Portuondo, Miami, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
APPENDIX A: ACTIONS OF THE

JANUARY 31, 2022, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the naming of a space at the National Museum of 

African American History and Culture. Details will remain confidential until publicly announced. 

[2022.01.01]

VOTED that the Board of Regents adopts the Consent Agenda, which constitutes the approval 

of all action items listed therein. [2022.01.02]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the minutes of the October 25, 2021,

meeting of the Board of Regents.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed amendments to the

Investment Committee’s Charter.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed slate of candidates for

appointment or reappointment to 11 Smithsonian Institution Advisory Boards.

1

VOTED that the Board of Regents recognizes the generosity of Qualcomm Incorporated

to the National Museum of Natural History and accepts the terms of the sponsorship

agreement.

VOTED that the Board of Regents recognizes the generosity of Bank of America

Corporation to the National Museum of the American Latino and accepts the terms of

the sponsorship agreement.

VOTED that the Board of Regents recognizes the generosity of Mrs. Rebecca Benaroya

to the Smithsonian American Art Museum and names the Rebecca and Jack Benaroya

Court for 20 years or until the next comprehensive renovation of the Renwick Gallery,

whichever occurs later.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves adoption of the bylaws of the Smithsonian

American Women’s History Museum Advisory Council and the proposed amendments

thereto. [2022.01.03]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the Compensation and Human Resources 

Committee’s 2022 compensation recommendations for senior executive positions. [2022.01.04]

1 Dr. Risa J. Lavizzo-Mourey was recused.
2

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed committee chairmanship and

member assignments for 2022 and requests that the Chancellor make the necessary

appointments. [2021.01.05]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the Compensation and Human Resources 

Committee’s 2022 compensation recommendation for the Secretary. [2022.01.06]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Trodella & Lapping LLP

540 Pacific Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94133

Richard A. Lapping (SBN: 107496)

Trodella & Lapping LLP

540 Pacific Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94133

Telephone: (415) 399-1015

Facsimile: (415) 651-9004

 Rich@TrodellaLapping.com

Attorneys for Valero Refining Company-California 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

-andPACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

□ Affects PG&E Corporation

■ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

□ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case,

No. 19-30088 (DM).

Case No.: 19-30088-DM

Chapter 11

ORDER ON MOTION TO FILE 

REDACTED DOCUMENT AND TO FILE 

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Date: May 9, 2019

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Place: Courtroom 17

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor

San Francisco, California

Judge: Hon. Dennis Montali

Upon the Motion dated May 6, 2019, Docket 1862, (the “Motion”) of Creditor Valero 

Refining Company-California (“Valero”) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 107(b), 11 U.S.C., Federal 

Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9018, the Court’s New District Wide Procedures for Electronically 

Filing Sealed and Redacted Documents, and District Court Local Rule 79-5, made applicable by 

Bankruptcy Local Rule 1001-2(a), for entry of an order granting the redaction and sealing of 

documents as described in the Motion, and the Court having reviewed the Motion, the Declaration of 

Richard A. Lapping, and after due consideration of the premises and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

Signed and Filed: May 13, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

May 13, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1990 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 14:18:37 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Trodella & Lapping LLP

540 Pacific Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94133

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or 

related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order. 

*** END OF ORDER ***

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1990 Filed: 05/13/19 Entered: 05/13/19 14:18:37 Page 2 of

2
#### Tony Maneri, as Administrator, etc., of Gabriel Maneri, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Adrian H. Joline and Douglas Robinson, as Receivers of the New York City Railway Company, Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment entered on the 15th day of October, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order entered on the 14th day of October, 1910, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that the' finding of the jury that the defendants were guilty of negligence is against the evidence.

Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellants to abide event.
Exhibit 1-H

Legal Support Services

REDACTED VERSION OF EXHIBIT

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 1

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 2

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 3

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 4

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 5

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 6

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 7

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 8

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page 9

of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

10 of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

11 of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

12 of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

13 of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

14 of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

15 of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

16 of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

17 of 18
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2172-10 Filed: 05/21/19 Entered: 05/21/19 17:15:01 Page

18 of 18
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20609 Conference Calendar

__________________
MICHAEL J. GOMEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BACKLOG OF NORTH TEXAS, Subsidiary of Texas Management Division of Houston Incorporated; STACEY D. KIMMELMAN, Managing agent for Idlewood Apartments Association, a Texas Joint Venture, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. MC-H-95-203

- - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael J. Gomez appeals the district court's denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his civil suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act. He argues that the district court improperly denied IFP and deferred ruling on his motion to proceed IFP on appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no issue of arguable merit. Accordingly, we deny IFP95-20609 -2- and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Gomez that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Gomez is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court. IFP DENIED, APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
#### Alice de Brauwere v. Louis de Brauwere.

Motion granted, question certified as stated in order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      17,651,373
<SECURITIES>                                 4,978,850
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,833,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (219,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,656,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,371,733
<PP&E>                                      24,658,878
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,496,275)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,113,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,652,436
<BONDS>                                      8,858,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,653,939
<COMMON>                                        14,578
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,146,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,113,877
<SALES>                                      1,859,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,029,316
<CGS>                                        5,551,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,566,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,076,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               219,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,307,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (20,379,392)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (20,379,392)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (20,379,392)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Lorenzo D. Chilson, Respondent, v. Chauncey Huggans, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FIRST SOUTHWESTERN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

VAIDA MORALI, et al.,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-919

[April 21, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE10-

26929.

Joshua I. Gornitsky of Searles, Sheppard & Gornitsky, PLLC, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Mauri Peyton of PeytonBolin, PL, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that “[w]ithout a record of the trial 

proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying 

factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not 

supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory,” and “[w]ithout

knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably 

conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require 

reversal”).

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## SJI Grant Reports Available Online

SJI continues to make all grant reports and most grant products available online through the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) Library and Digital Archive. Potential applicants are encouraged to thoroughly research the online library for reports on their topic area, prior to submitting a grant application to SJI. The NCSC Library and Digital Archive are two different resources with unique URLs. It is recommended that searches for SJI grant reports and other state court resources begin with the NCSC Library section.

The NCSC Library also maintains an active Twitter feed with state court updates and additions to the collection.

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1883 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 12:38:12 Page 1 of

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             482
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,073
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     10,702
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,830
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            21,580
<LOANS>                                          9,198
<ALLOWANCE>                                        485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,312
<DEPOSITS>                                      35,534
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                242
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  45,312
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    822
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,212
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   106
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,140
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,722
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,751
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,389
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (45)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    259
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       211
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        636
<LOANS-PAST>                                       799
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    18
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   530
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (45)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  485
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            197
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF MICON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of any mineralized material and other analyses performed by us in our capacity as
an independent consultant to Golden Minerals Company (the "Company"), which are set forth in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, in
the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-167026 and 333-168304) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-159096, 333-165933 and 333-170891), any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto, and in any amendment to any of the foregoing.

Date: February 16, 2011

MICON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED/s/ CHRISTOPHER A. JACOBS Name:  Christopher A. Jacobs
Title:    Vice President


---



QuickLinks
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00822

- CR

Ricardo RUIZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR0550

Honorable Mary D. Rom á n, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARION

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED December 17, 2014.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   ADDITIONS            DEDUCTIONS
                                               BEGINNING           CHARGED TO           CHARGED TO        ENDING BALANCE
                                                BALANCE              INCOME              RESERVE
                                            ----------------    -----------------    -----------------    ---------------

<S>                                            <C>               <C>                 <C>                   <C>
Accounts receivable allowances - 2001           $   985,000       $2,838,000           $2,100,000           $1,723,000
Accounts receivable allowances - 2000             1,200,000        2,365,000            2,580,000              985,000
Accounts receivable allowances - 1999             1,058,000        3,166,000            3,024,000            1,200,000
</TABLE>




<PAGE>




                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in the
United States the financial statements included in Renaissance Learning, Inc.'s
annual report to shareholders included in this Form 10-K, and have issued our
report thereon dated January 18, 2002. Our audit was made for the purpose of
forming an opinion on those statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in
the index above as Exhibit 99.1 is the responsibility of the company's
management and is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and is not part of the basic financial statements.
This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit
of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all
material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

                                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
January 18, 2002