alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Accountants' Consent



The Board of Directors
Union Financial Services - 1, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement (No.
333-28551)on  Form  S-3,  relating  to  Union  Financial  Services  - 1,  Inc.'s
registration of Taxable  Student Loan  Asset-Backed  Notes of our report,  dated
February 19, 1999,  relating to the balance sheets of Union Financial Services -
1, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and related  statements of operations,
stockholders'  equity  (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
1998 and 1997 and the period from inception  (February 28, 1996) to December 31,
1996,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K
of Union Financial Services - 1, Inc.

   

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                             
Lincoln, Nebraska
March 30, 1999
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 4, 2017

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-934

Lower Tribunal No. 15-12831

________________

Mollie Zweig

, Appellant,

vs.

Il Villaggio Condominium Association, Inc.

,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto

, Judge.

Siegfried, Rivera, Hyman, Lerner, De La Torre, Mars & Sobel, P.A., and

Nicholas D. Siegfried and Diane J. Zelmer

, for appellant.

Halpern Rodriguez, LLP, and Marc A. Halpern and Priscilla S. Zaldivar

, for

appellee.

Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

In the case below, the appellant unit owner filed a lawsuit seeking an

injunction to require the appellee condominium association to “refrain fromapproving the vertical unit combination” of two units of a neighboring owner. The

trial court entered summary judgment against her because her lawsuit was not ripe.

We affirm.

Although the condominium association’s board allowed the neighboring unit

owner’s engineer to preliminarily test a concrete slab to determine if combining the

units was structurally feasible, no application for permission to combine the units

had been filed. As the case stood at the time of summary judgment, therefore, the

application to combine the units may ultimately not be filed. If filed, the

application may not be approved, and if unlawfully approved, sufficient legal and

equitable remedies will exist to address any potential harm to the appellant unit

owner. In these circumstances, the claim that the unit owner might be harmed if an

application is filed, and if the application is granted, is too attenuated to support a

lawsuit. See Condos. on Intracoastal Ass’n, Inc. v. Barnett Bank of Palm Beach

Cty.

, 502 So. 2d 84, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (suit to bar association from

conducting a meeting to consider amendment to declaration of condominium was

premature because the “record contains no evidence to support a finding that the

members of the condominium association will in fact pass the amendment”). See

generally

, Hernandez v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Hillsborough Cty.

, 153 So. 790, 791

(1934) (“Mere allegations that a board of county commissioners is threatening to

pass resolutions or edicts which, if passed, will be unlawful or ineffective,

2constitute no ground for injunctive interference with the preliminary internal

functioning of the county board.”).

Affirmed.

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1874 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 10:14:59 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1874 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 10:14:59 Page 2 of

2
# Bourke Hickenlooper: A Featured Biography

**

----

Bourke Hickenlooper, known to his constituents as “Hick,” represented Iowa in the U.S. Senate from 1945 to 1969. During his 24 years of Senate service, Hickenlooper chaired the Republican Policy Committee and the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, and served as ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. An ardent anti-Communist, Hickenlooper opposed the censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy and sided with General Douglas MacArthur in his feud with President Truman. In 1964 Hickenlooper co-authored the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and promoted American involvement in Vietnam. After negotiating with Republican leader Everett Dirksen and bill manager Hubert Humphrey, Hickenlooper voted for cloture to end debate on the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He did not, however, vote for the bill itself, arguing that it granted the federal government too much power over the lives of average Americans.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
EXHIBIT
23.1






CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-26575, No. 333-80185, and No. 333-66729) of 99¢ Only Stores of our
reports dated June 10, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule for the years ended  March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007
and 2006; and our report on internal control over financial reporting (which
expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal
control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses) as of March 29,
2008 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/
      BDO Seidman, LLPLos
      Angeles, CAJune
      10, 2008
## »,

CHIEF JUSTICE ROGELIO VALDEZ JUSTICES NELDAV. RODRIGUEZ ; DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

G1NA M. BENAVIDES GREGORY T. PERKES NORA L. LONGORIA CLERK DORIAN E. RAMIREZ 

# Court ofSppeate ®\)ivtttnt\) JBi&tvitt of %txa$ January 11,2016
Hon. Abel Acosta, Clerk Courtof Criminal Appeals 201 West 14th St., Room 106 Austin, TX 78701 Re: Cause No. 13-14-00090-CR Tr.Ct.No. C1CR-11-221292 

### Style: Jason Harding v. The State ofTexas NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE 901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401 361-888-0416 (TEL) 361-888-0794 (FAX) HIDALGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BLDG. 100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539 956-318-2405 (TEL) 956-318-2403 (FAX) www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa



### The record in the above cause was this day electronically submitted to the Court 

### of Criminal Appeals. Exhibits [SX2, SX3, & DX along with Sealed medical records] will be mailed separately.

DER:ch 

### Very truly yours,
Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk


### cc: Hon. Giselle Norton (DELIVERED VIAE-MAIL) 

### Hon. Ariel Payan (DELIVERED VIAE-MAIL) Hon. David A. Escamilla (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)


## RECEIVEDIN 

# COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JAM 15 2016 

# AbelAcosta,Cleric
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-10-016]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

May 26, 2010 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-149 (Third Review) (Barium Chloride from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before June 9, 2010.)

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission:

Issued: May 18, 2010.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 2010-12329 Filed 5-18-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,591
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    287,705
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,189,253
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,193,469
<LOANS>                                      5,307,086
<ALLOWANCE>                                     48,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,189,342
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,248,932
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,432,166
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             98,562
<LONG-TERM>                                    951,261
<COMMON>                                           326
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     458,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,189,342
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                214,181
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               51,849
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               266,030
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             107,722
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             179,473
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           86,557
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,026
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 62,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,819
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      34,868
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.52
<LOANS-NON>                                     41,416
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,748
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                48,467
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,637
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,230
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               48,060
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,631
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         38,429 
        

</TABLE>
SCWC

- 21

- 0000 285

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

IN THE INTEREST OF A SK

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 21

- 0000 285 ; FC

- S NO. 18

- 00112, FC

- S NO. 18

- 00241, FC

- A NO. 20

- 1

- 6137 , FC

- A NO. 21

- 1

- 6005 )

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins , JJ.)

Petitioner s ’ application for writ of certiorari filed

on June 30 , 2022, is accepted

.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai ‘ i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i , August 18 , 202 2

. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-21-0000285 18-AUG-2022 08:20 AM Dkt. 11 OGAC
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## SJI Releases FY 2018 Grant Guideline

SJI recently released the Grant Guideline for FY 2018.  The Grant Guideline appears as part of the National Archives and Records Administration’s Federal Register, and sets forth the administrative, programmatic, and financial requirements for applying for and administering SJI grants.

Fiscal Year 2018 Deadlines for Project, Technical Assistance, and Curriculum Adaptation Grants are as follows:
                  - 1st Quarter – November 1, 2017;
                  - 2nd Quarter – February 1, 2018;
                  - 3rd Quarter – May 1, 2018; and,
                  - 4th Quarter – August 1, 2018.

 

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated  Balance  Sheet  at June  30,  1998 and the  related  Statement  of
Consolidated  Operations for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998      
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               134,219
<SECURITIES>                                         149,699
<RECEIVABLES>                                         48,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                           83,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     450,194
<PP&E>                                             2,204,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,271,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,505,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                142,436
<BONDS>                                              356,069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             211,162
<OTHER-SE>                                           393,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,505,461
<SALES>                                              416,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     411,502
<CGS>                                                351,798 <F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        375,635 <F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      55,098 <F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    10,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (29,559)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                           2,342 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (37,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (37,517)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.18)

<FN>
<F1> Includes  Production  costs and  Depreciation,  depletion and  amortization
     from the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
<F2> Includes  Production  costs,  Depreciation,  depletion and amortization and
     Administrative  and general  expense  from the  Statement  of  Consolidated
     Operations.
<F3> Includes  Exploration  expense,  Write-downs  and  other  unusual  charges,
     Business  combination  and  integration  costs and Other  expense  from the
     Statement of Consolidated Operations.


</FN>
        

</TABLE>
FILED

Mar 25, 2021

11:41 AM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1875 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 11:08:40 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1875 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 11:08:40 Page 2 of

2
Second Department,

June, 1911.

#### In the Matter of the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to Be the Last Will and Testament of Mary S. Robinson, Deceased. Burton C. Meighan, as Executor of, and Burton C. Meighan and Frank B. Upham, the Trustees Named in the Last Will and Testament of Mary S. Robinson, Deceased, Appellants; Ida Stevens Halsted and Otheman Abel Stevens, Respondents.

*Trust*— *spendthrift ti-Ust—accumulation of income.*

Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on March 6, 1911.

Per Curiam:

We agree with the determination of the surrogate of Westchester county that the attempted trust set forth in the 8th, 9th and 10th clauses of the will in question is void. We think, however, that the trust attempted to be created in the 6th and 7th clauses of the will is valid. Thi s trust does not direct any accumulation of income, but because it makes any payment of income or from the corpus absolutely dependent upon the discretion of the trustees under defined conditions, it may be said that it sanctions an accumulation of income during a period which is not measured by a minority. To' this extent the accumulation would be unlawful. Under these circumstances, the. accumulation, if any resulted, would go to those entitled to the next eventual estate, who in this case, as the will is now construed, would be the next of kin of the testatrix. The trust in question can continue, however, certainly as to the corpus of the trust fund during the period defined by the will. In this respect the trust in question is quite similar to the class, well recognized as valid, known as “spendthrift trusts.” We think that *Holland*v. *Alcock*(108 N. Y. 312), cited by the learned surrogate, * does not apply here, for in that case there were no definito beneficiaries of the attempted trust, while here the contemplated beneficiaries aré fully defined by the will as being the next of kin of the testatrix. The decree of the Surrogate’s Court should be so modified as to declare valid the trust set forth in the 6th and 7th clauses of the will, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements of the appeal payable out of the estate to all the parties who have filed briefs on this appeal.

Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.', concurred.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county mo'dified so as to declare valid the trust set forth in the 6th and 7th clauses of the will, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements of the appeal payable out of the estate to all the parties who have filed briefs on this appeal.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Ronald S. Beacher – State Bar Number 130318

PRYOR CASHMAN LLP

7 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

Telephone: (212) 421-4100

Facsimile: (212) 326-0806

Attorneys for Interested Parties

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORTATION,

Debtor.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

REQUEST FOR NOTICE

The undersigned requests notice of these proceedings be sent to:

Ronald S. Beacher, Esq.

Pryor Cashman LLP

7 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

Email: rbeacher@pryorcashman.com

Tel: (212) 421-4100

Fax: (212) 326-0806

Dated: February 1, 2019 Pryor Cashman LLP

By /s/Ronald S. Beacher

Ronald S. Beacher

7 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

Email: rbeacher@pryorcashman.com

Tel: (212) 421-4100

Fax: (212) 326-0806

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 219 Filed: 02/01/19 Entered: 02/01/19 07:49:15 Page 1 of 1
Order entered July 30, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-00867-CV

IN RE VICTORIA MANUSOS-JENKINS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-54413-2012



### ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Just ice Bridges and Justice Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE