Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

Exhibit A 

Proposed Order 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2359-1 Filed: 06/03/19 Entered: 06/03/19 17:32:43 Page 1

of 4
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: 212 310 8000 

Fax: 212 310 8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Peter J. Benvenutti (#60566) 

(pbenvenutti@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: 415 496 6723 

Fax: 650 636 9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE 

MOTION OF THE UTILITY FOR 

LIMITED RELIEF FROM THE 

AUTOMATIC STAY TO APPEAL 

CERTAIN MATTERS PENDING BEFORE 

THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2359-1 Filed: 06/03/19 Entered: 06/03/19 17:32:43 Page 2

of 4
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

Upon the Motion, dated June 3, 2019 [Dkt. No. __] (the “Motion”),3 of PG&E Corporation 

(“PG&E Corp.”) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the “Utility”), as debtors and debtors in 

possession (collectively, “PG&E” or the “Debtors”) in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases (the 

“Chapter 11 Cases”), pursuant to sections 105 and 362 of title 11 of the United States Code (the 

“Bankruptcy Code”), all as more fully set forth in the Motion; and this Court having jurisdiction to 

consider the Motion and the relief requested therein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334, Order 

Referring Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings to Bankruptcy Judges, General Order 24 (N.D. Cal.), 

and Rule 5011-1(a) of the Bankruptcy Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of California (the “Bankruptcy Local Rules”); and consideration of the Motion and the 

requested relief being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper before 

this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and the Court having found and determined that 

notice of the Motion as provided to the parties listed therein is reasonable and sufficient under the 

circumstances, and it appearing that no other or further notice need be provided; and this Court having 

held a hearing on the Motion; and this Court having determined that the legal and factual bases set 

forth in the Motion and the Declaration of Theodore E. Tsekerides establish just cause for the relief 

sought; and upon all of the proceedings had before this Court and after due deliberation and sufficient 

cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Motion is granted as provided herein. The Court grants (a) prospective relief from the 

automatic stay to permit the Utility to file and prosecute to conclusion an appeal of the FERC 

Orders, and (b) retroactive relief from the automatic stay, to the extent necessary, to avoid the 

invalidation based on the automatic stay of the Utility’s Requests for Rehearing, or the FERC 

Orders, or of post-petition actions by the Utility or FERC relating to the FERC Orders. 

 

3

 Capitalized terms used but not otherwise herein defined shall have the meanings given to such 

terms in the Motion. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2359-1 Filed: 06/03/19 Entered: 06/03/19 17:32:43 Page 3

of 4
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

2. This Order does not authorize, permit or validate the commencement or continuation of any 

other litigation proceedings at FERC, specifically including but not limited to proceedings 

relating to any of the PPAs. 

3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or related to 

the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Order. 

** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2359-1 Filed: 06/03/19 Entered: 06/03/19 17:32:43 Page 4

of 4