alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPENDIX A: ACTIONS OF THE

JUNE 10, 2019, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

VOTED that the Board of Regents accepts the joint recommendation by the Facilities 

Committee and Finance Committee, and authorizes the Smithsonian to negotiate and effect the 

purchase and acquisition of a building to be used primarily for purposes of administrative office 

space, subject to the following conditions: (1) that the Congress enact legislation authorizing 

the Smithsonian to deposit into the general trust funds of the Institution Federal appropriations 

designated for lease or rent payments, to the extent that federally supported activities will be 

housed in the Building, for use for expenses associated with the purchase of the Building; (2) 

that the Institution secure financing for the costs of acquiring the Building and other expenses 

associated with the purchase of the building; and (3) that the Secretary consult with the 

Facilities Committee and the Finance Committee after final terms of the purchase are 

negotiated and before the purchase is effected. The Board further authorizes the Secretary to 

secure financing up to a level approved by the Facilities and Finance Committees, such 

financing to be inclusive of the costs for moving to, and building out, the newly acquired space.

[2019.06.01]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves management’s recommendation that the 

Smithsonian Institution sell its remaining equity interest in the Smithsonian Channel. 

[2019.06.02]

VOTED that the Board of Regents adopts the Consent Agenda, which constitutes the approval 

of all action items listed therein. [2019.06.03]

VOTED that the Board of Regents expresses its profound appreciation to the memory of 

the Honorable Thad Cochran, former Regent and Regent Emeritus, esteemed 

statesman, and friend of the Smithsonian Institution, and extends its heartfelt 

sympathies to his family.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the minutes of the April 8, 2019, meeting of 

the Board of Regents.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed slate of candidates for 

appointment or reappointment to 12 Smithsonian advisory boards.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the fiscal year 2021 federal budget priorities 

proposed by the Secretary. [2019.06.04]
2

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves a five percent payout from the Smithsonian 

Endowment in fiscal year 2020 to support programmatic activity. The Board further approves 

0.50 percent payout from the Smithsonian Endowment in fiscal year 2020 to support 

advancement activity. The payout shall be calculated against the trailing five-year average 

market value of the Smithsonian Endowment. [2019.06.05]

VOTED that the Board of Regents appoints KPMG, LLP as the Smithsonian Institution’s external 

independent auditors for a one-year period beginning July 2019 with four one‐year option 

periods. [2019.06.06]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, Clinical Trials Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         June 28-29, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keary A Cope, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7190, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-2222,                         *copeka@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 19, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-12550 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
· 

THE STATE OF TEXAS • 

vs 

ISIDRO ESPINOSA SOLIS 

No. 2014-CR-2691 • 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT . 

.I 75th JUDICIAL DISTRICT . . 

f)6X'ArL Coun1Y, rexAs 

Defendant's Motion For An Extension of Time to File Appeal 

COMES NOW, ISIDRO ESPINOSA SOLIS, Defendant herein, who, by and through the 

undersigned attorney of record, respectfully moves that this Honorable CoUrt Grant an extension 

oftime to file Notice of Appeal in this case. Defendant offers the following: 

Counsel for Defendant accidentally m.issed two days in his count for the date 90 days 

from the date that the trial court imposed sentence on Def~ndant. As a result, Defendant 

respectfully requests that this. honorable Court grant Defendant a tWo day extension to file the 

Notice of Appeal in this case. 

Respectfully submitted:-

·David Herrick 

The historic Milam building 

115 East Travis, Suite 500 

San Antonio, Texas 78205 

(21 0) 455-5225 

(210) 455-9144- FAX 

john@jdherrick.com 

Attorney for Defendant Isidro Solis 

3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion for Extension of time 

to file Notice of Appeal has been sent to the Bexar County District Attorneys office at the 

following address: 

Bexar County District Attorney 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00596-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

10/20/2015 10:09:15 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK
4 

Paul Elizondo Tower 

4th floor · · 

San Antonio, Texas 78205 

On this the 3 Olh day of September; 20 15 . . 
~ . 

.... . 
THE STATE OF TEXAS 

vs. 

ISIDRO ESPINOSA SOLIS 

No. 2014-CR-2691 

§ IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

§ 

§ !75TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

§ 

§ BEXARCOUNTY,TEXAS 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 

NOW COMES TRENT JACKSON, Defendant herein, who files this Notice of Appeal in 

the above styled and numbered cause. 

Respectfully submitted: 

ohn D. Herrick 

115 E. Travis, Suite 500 

San Antonio, Texas 78205 

(210) 455-5225 

(210) 4559144- FAX 

SBN: 24000478 

Attorney for Isidro Espinosa Solis (.H 

- o ;:::: ~:: : :. : -..:.:· .... .;~~ :~· . : i.: 

04-15-00596-CR

ACCEPTED

04-15-00596-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

10/20/2015 10:09:15 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 10/20/15 10:09:15 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Dissenting Opinion from Denial of En Banc Reconsideration filed April 2, 2020.

In the

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00498-CR

NO. 14-15-00499-CR

SCOTT NILES, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 14

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2018917 & 2018918

DISSENTING OPINION FROM DENIAL OF EN BANC

RECONSIDERATION

I join the dissenting opinion from the denial of en banc reconsideration. I write

separately to note that no motions for rehearing were filed in these appeals. Were

they to have been filed, I would have voted to grant rehearing.
2

/s/ Charles A. Spain

Justice

En Banc Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher, Wise, Jewell, 

Bourliot, Zimmerer, Spain, Hassan, and Poissant. (Bourliot, J., dissenting, joined by 

Zimmerer, J., Spain, J., Hassan, J.; Spain, J., dissenting).

Publish—Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Reynaldo Morales v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00549

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 54065

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Reynaldo Morales, has filed an en banc motion for reconsideration.

After due consideration, the Court denies the motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____ Justice Richard Hightower

_______________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court



### En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau,

Hightower, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra, and Farris

.

Date: ___ June 21, 2022

_____
ACTIONS OF THE SEPTEMBER 6, 2019, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the budget of appropriated funds for fiscal year 2020 when signed into 

law by the President, the institutional budget for Trust funds for fiscal year 2020 reflected in 

this report, and authorizes expenditures by the Secretary in accordance therewith. Any material

changes in program plans incorporated into this budget shall be made only with the approval of 

the Board of Regents or its Executive committee.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the Smithsonian Institution’s budget request for appropriated funds for 

fiscal year 2021 for presentation to the Office of Management and Budget. Any material 

changes in program plans incorporated into this budget shall be made only with the approval of 

the Board of Regents or its Executive Committee.
#### John Durrell and Another, Respondents, v. School District Number Eight of the Town of Sheridan, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


The Board of Directors
Packeteer, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (File number 333-86717) of Packeteer, Inc. of our report dated January 21,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Packeteer, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years
then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form
10-K of Packeteer, Inc.

                                       /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
March 23, 2000
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutrition 21, Inc., a New York
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Paul
      Intlekofer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
      his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    
                Paul
                IntlekoferPaul
                Intlekofer
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer


February
      11, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nutrition 21, Inc. and will be retained by Nutrition 21, Inc. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-51191

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

LEOPOLDO VALENCIA-URREA,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-973-3

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leopoldo Valencia-Urrea appeals his guilty-plea convictions and 

sentences for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to 

commit money laundering. He claims he was denied his Sixth Amendment 

right to the effective assistance of counsel (IAC). In particular, he maintains 

counsel, inter alia, encouraged him to sign a plea agreement that provided 

little or no benefit to him and failed to file a written response to the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 5, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-51191 Document: 00512461757 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/05/2013
No. 12-51191

Government’s sentencing memorandum, which sought an increased sentence 

based on his post-plea conduct.

Valencia did not raise his IAC claims in district court. “[T]he general 

rule in this circuit is that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel cannot 

be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the 

district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits 

of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 

2006) (alteration in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Because “we cannot fairly evaluate the [IAC] claim[s] from the record”, we 

decline to consider them, without prejudice to his right to raise them in a 

subsequent proceeding, such as pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. 

Gulley, 526 F.3d 809, 821 (5th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-51191 Document: 00512461757 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/05/2013
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Baccio Ciarpi v. James C. Cropsey, as Commissioner, etc.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted.
Exhibit 10.9





FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.





Executive Incentive


Compensation Plan





Summary of 2011 Implementation Guide








Plan Description


Under this plan, the Compensation Committee of the holding company board will establish performance measures and goal weightings for each year based on synergies and desired focus. The performance measures will be both quantitative and qualitative in nature.





Performance Components


Corporate financial measures will be based on corporate relevant metrics and operating subsidiary (OS) measures will be based on OS relevant metrics. Certain senior executives of each OS, including its CEO, will have a portion of their incentive compensation tied to corporate performance given the high degree of synergy with corporate objectives.





The following performance component weights will apply to the Company's executive officers for 2011:





TierCorporateOSIndividualHolding Co. - CEO/CFO100%——OS - CEO100%——





Performance Targets


Specific targets will be established on an annual basis for each performance component and will be evaluated on a sliding scale ranging from 50% of the bonus opportunity to 150% of the bonus opportunity.  Any measure falling below the 50% level will reduce the related bonus opportunity to 0%.





Individual Target Bonuses


Target bonuses for the following executive officers will be as follows (as a percentage of 2011 base salary):





TierTarget Bonus(as % of base salary)Holding Co. - CEO100%Holding Co. - CFO50%OS - CEO50%
Exhibit 32(b)





Certification of


Chief Financial Officer


Of 99¢ Only Stores





This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the period ended April 2, 2011 of 99¢ Only Stores (the "Issuer").





I, Robert Kautz, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





Dated: May 26, 2011




By:
/s/ Robert KautzName:
Robert KautzTitle:
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
94th Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 94-547

VETO OF ACT AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS 

FOR THE FEDERAL FIRE PREVENTION AND 

CONTROL ADMINISTRATION

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

VETOING

H.R. 12567, AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR

THE FEDERAL FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL ACT OF

1974 AND THE ACT OF MARCH 3, 1901, FOR FISCAL YEARS

1977 AND 1978, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

J u ly 19, 1976.—Message and accompanying act referred to the Committee

on Science and Technology and ordered to be printed

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

★ 57-011 O WASHINGTON : 1976
To the House of Representatives: I am returning, without my approval, H.R. 12567, a bill “to authorize appropriations for the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 and the Act of March 3,1901, for fiscal years 1977 and 1978, and for other purposes.” I am disapproving H.R. 12567 because it contains a provision that would seriously obstruct the exercise of the President’s constitutional responsibilities over Executive branch operations. Section 2 of the enrolled bill provides that Congress may, by concurrent resolution, “veto” a plan to commit funds for construction of the National Acad­ emy for Fire Prevention and Control. This provision extends to the Congress the power to prohibit specific transactions authorized by law, without changing the law and without following the constitu­ tional process such a change would require. Moreover, it involves the Congress directly in the performance of Executive functions in disre­ gard of the fundamental principle of separation of powers. Provisions of this type have been appearing in an increasing number of bills which this Congress has passed or is considering. Most are in­ tended to enhance the power of the Congress over the detailed execu­ tion of the laws at the expense of the President’s authority. I have consistently opposed legislation containing these provisions, and will continue to oppose actions that constitute a legislative encroachment on the Executive branch. I urge the Congress to reconsider H.R. 12567 and to pass a bill I can accept so that it will be possible for the National Fire Prevention and Control Administration to proceed with its important work.

Gerald R. F ord.

The White H ouse, July 7 ,1976.

(in)

H. D. 547
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: September 18, 2014 105921

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRIAN AMELL, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: August 4, 2014 Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.

__________ Michael C. Ross, Bloomingburg, for appellant, and appellant pro se. D. Holley, Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (McGinty, J.), rendered April 23, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Defendant thereafter was sentenced as a second felony offender to the agreed-upon prison term of seven years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.-2- 105921

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, counsel's brief and defendant's pro se submission, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Jennings, 117 AD3d 1281 [2014]; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]). We note, however, that although defendant was properly sentenced as a second violent felony offender, the uniform sentence and commitment form incorrectly contains a notation indicating that he was sentenced as a second felony offender. "While this error does not require that an otherwise legal sentence be vacated, the uniform sentence and commitment form must be amended accordingly" (People v Washington, 117 AD3d 1279, 1280 [2014] [citations omitted]). Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, application to be relieved of assignment granted, and matter remitted for entry of an amended uniform sentence and commitment form.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court