alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin C. Quinn, President of the Corporation, certify that:
   --------------

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending
March 31, 2004 of First Chester County Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

May 14, 2004

/s/ Kevin C. Quinn
---------------------------
Kevin C. Quinn
President
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-11759, No. 333-32785, No. 333-58999 and No. 333-86383)
pertaining to the 1993 Amended Incentive Stock Plan, the 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and the 1996 Director Option Plan of Microcide Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. of our report dated February 2, 2001 with respect to the financial
statements of Microcide Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2000.



                                                          /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 16, 2001
#### LORING McMILLAN, Plaintiff, *v.*CHARLES F. BELLOWS and Others, Defendants.

*Repeal of an amendatory act*— ■when *it does not remve the original act*— *sea. 4, art. 1, til.*2, *chap.*13, *prn't*1 *of the Revised Statutes, was not revived by the repeal of chap.*287 *of*1871 *by chap.*335 *of*1872.

Motion for a new trial on the part of the defendants, on exceptions ordered to be heard at the General Term in the first instance, judgment in the meantime having been suspended.

This action was brought to recover damages of the defendants, who were assessors in the town of Seneca Falls, in Seneca county, for improperly assessing the plaintiff’s land in that town, the plaintiff claiming that the lands assessed in the town of Seneca Falls were a part of his farm located in the town of Tyre, on which he resided; that they were separated by a road known as the State road, which was also the town line.

*215The court at General Term, after referring to section 4 article 1, title 2, chapter 13, part 1 Revised Statutes, and its amendment bj chapter 287 of 1871, and the repeal of the latter act by chapter 355 .of 1872, said: “ The question thus presented is whether or not the repeal of chapter 287 of the Laws of 1871 operates to restore section 4 of the Revised Statutes.

“ This question was considered in the case of the *People ex rel. Ccmajoharie National Panic*v. *The Board of Supervisors of Montgomery County*(67 N. Y.j 109). It was in that case held that the amendment of a statute by declaring that the same shall read as prescribed by the amendatory act, is not a repeal of the original statute, but from the time of the passage of the amendatory act the whole force of the enactment as to subsequent transactions rests upon it; the former statute is merged in it, has no validity distinct from it, and can only be referred to as to past transactions; that a repeal of the amendatory act does not revive the original act, but both fall together.

“ This question has recently been under consideration in this court in the case of *Harris*v. *The Board of Supervisors of Niagara County*(33 Hun, 279), in which case it was held that section 4 of the Revised Statutes, above quoted, was repealed. (See opinion on page 282.)

“We discover no reason why we should depart from the conclusion reached by us in that case.”

*Murray <&*Harmon, for the plaintiff.

*J. N.*Raymond, for the defendants.

Opinion by

Haight, J.;

Smith, P. J., BabKeb and Bbadlet, JJ., concurred.

Motion for new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
93221010.1 

Rebecca J. Winthrop (CA Bar No. 116386) 

NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 

555 South Flower Street, Forty-First Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 892-9200 

Facsimile: (213) 892-9494 

rebecca.winthrop@nortonrosefulbright.com 

William R. Greendyke (TX Bar No. 08390450) 

Jason Boland (TX Bar No. 24040542) 

Julie Goodrich Harrison (TX Bar No. 24092434) 

NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 

1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 

Houston, Texas 77010-3095 

Telephone: (713) 651-5151 

Facsimile: (713) 651-5246 

william.greendyke@nortonrosefulbright.com 

jason.boland@nortonrosefulbright.com 

julie.harrison@nortonrosefulbright.com 

Attorneys for Creditor BERRY PETROLEUM 

COMPANY, LLC 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 Debtor. 

Case No. 19-30088 

 19-30089 

Chapter 11 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

In re: 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, 

 

 Debtor. 

 I, the undersigned, declare that I am employed in Houston, Texas. I am over the 

age of 18 years and not a party to the within entitled action. My business address is 

Fulbright Tower, 1301 McKinney St., Suite 5100, Houston, Texas, 77010-3095. 

 On January 31, 2019, I served the within: 

 RESERVATION OF RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO DEBTORS’ 

CUSTOMER PROGRAMS MOTION 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 174 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 08:00:56 Page 1 of 2
93221010.1 

 X TO BE SERVED BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: On January 31, 2019, I 

attached a true and correct copy of the above-named document to an e-mail addressed to 

each of the following persons at the e-mail addresses listed below: 

Stephen Karotkin 

stephen.karotkin@weil.com; 

Jessica Liou 

jessica.liou@weil.com; 

Matthew Goren 

matthew.goren@weil.com; 

Tobias S. Keller 

tkeller@kellerbenvenutii.com; 

Jane Kim 

jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com 

 X TO BE SERVED BY OVERNIGHT MAIL: On January 31, 2019, by 

placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed Federal Express envelope and affixing a 

pre-paid air bill, and causing the envelope to be delivered to a Federal Express agent for 

delivery, to the address(es) listed below: 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin 

Jessica Liou 

Matthew Goren 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: 212-310-8000 

Fax: 212-310-8007

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller 

Jane Kim 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108

 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. 

 Executed on January 31, 2019 at Houston, Texas. 

 

 /s/ Linda Smith 

 Linda Smith 

Form Rev. 2/05 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 174 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 08:00:56 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Forster Drilling
      Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that
      the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31,
      2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/
                    BUD NAJVARBud
                    Najvar
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
                  Date:
                    October 22, 2007
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 1 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1955 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 16:07:45 Page 9 of

9
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51224

Summary Calendar

TONY ROBERT DAVIS

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

GEORGE W BUSH, In His Official Capacity as the President of the United

States; MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, In His Official

Capacity as the Attorney General of the United States; THE BUREAU OF

PRISONS; THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; JOE ED CANALES, In His

Official Capacity as Supervised Release Officer with the United States District

Court for the Western District of Texas

Respondents-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CV-688

Before STEWART, OWEN and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tony Robert Davis, former federal prisoner # 68917-080, appeals from the

district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The

district court also imposed a $500 sanction based on Davis’s “continued

contumacious conduct.” In his § 2241 petition, Davis challenged his convictions

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 11, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51224

2

and sentences on eight counts of conspiracy, wire fraud, travel and

transportation of securities for fraudulent purposes, and money laundering. See

United States v. Davis, 226 F.3d 346, 348 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Davis’s § 2241 petition makes no claims that are cognizable in a § 2241

petition. See Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001).

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Despite having previously been sanctioned by this court on more than one

occasion, Davis has continued to file frivolous, disrespectful, and vexatious

pleadings without obtaining the requisite permission. Accordingly, Davis is

ordered to pay to the clerk of this court a $1,000 sanction. Davis must satisfy

this monetary sanction before filing anything in this court, including any motion

for permission to proceed after having been sanctioned. If Davis attempts to file

any further notices of appeal or original proceedings in this court without first

obtaining the requisite permission and paying the monetary sanction, the clerk

will docketthem for administrative purposes only. Any other submissions which

do not show proof that the monetary sanction has been paid and permission has

been granted for filing will be neither addressed nor acknowledged. Davis is

cautioned that he should review any pending complaints, motions, and appeals

and withdraw any that are frivolous. Davis is warned that failure to withdraw

any frivolous proceedings will result in the imposition of more monetary

sanctions, as will any further frivolous filings. 

Davis’s motion for leave to file a petition for relief is denied. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED; WARNING ISSUED.

MANDATE SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH.
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. HENRY JACOBS, Respondent, *v.*ELIZA BALL, Appellant.

*■Supplementary proceedings*— *subpoenas to witnesses should be under the hand of the referee before whom they are to testify*— *Code of Civil Procedure, sec.*854.

Where supplementary proceedings, instituted upon a County Court judgment, have been referred by the recorder of a city to a referee to take and report the evidence, subpcnnas to witnesses should be issued under the band of the referee before whom they are to testify, and not be tested in the name of the county judge and county clerk as though issued in an action pending in a County Court.

Appeal from, an order, made by tbe recorder of the city of 'Oswego, adjudging the appellant in contempt for willfully disobeying a subpoena directing her to appear and be examined as a witness in proceedings supplementary to execution.

*D. P. Lester,*for the appellant.

*O. B. Allison,*for the respondent.

Follett, J.:

Supplementary proceedings were instituted on a County Court judgment before the recorder of the city of Oswego, who referred the matter to a referee to take and report the evidence. The .attorney for the plaintiff in-the proceedings signed a subpoena which was tested in the name of the judge of the County Court and purported to bear the signature of the county clerk. The original ■subpoena was exhibited to the appellant and a ticket containing the substance of the original subpoena was delivered to her and her fees as a witness paid. The papers in form and the proceedings under them were sufficient to legally subpoena a witness to testify in an action pending in a County Court. The witness failed to attend, for which she was adjudged in contempt and fined thirty dollars by the recorder.

Supplementary proceedings are special proceedings. (Code Civil Pro., § 2433.) The subpoena should have issued under the hand of the referee before whom the witness was required to testify. (Code *246Civil Pro., § 854, and Throop’s note to § 2444.) A person cannot be punished for disobeying a process issued without authority.

The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Hardin, P. J., and Yann, J., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4868 

To expand the Moving to Work demonstration program of the Department 

of Housing and Urban Development, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2014 

Mr. STIVERS (for himself and Mrs. BEATTY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To expand the Moving to Work demonstration program of 

the Department of Housing and Urban Development, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Moving to Work Ex5 pansion Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM. 

7 (a) INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF PHAS.— 

8 The number of public housing agencies authorized to par9 ticipate in the Moving-to-Work demonstration program 

10 authorized under section 204 of the Departments of VetVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:21 Jun 17, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4868.IH H4868

smartinez on DSK4TPTVNPROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4868 IH

1 erans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and 

2 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996 (Public 

3 Law 104–134; 42 U.S.C. 1437f note; 110 Stat. 1321– 

4 281) is hereby increased by 10 over the number of agen5 cies authorized to participate in such program as of the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act. 

7 (b) ELIGIBILITY.—A public housing agency may be 

8 selected for participation pursuant to subsection (a) in the 

9 demonstration program referred to in such subsection only 

10 if the agency administers, in the aggregate, 10,000 or 

11 more public housing dwelling units and housing choice 

12 vouchers under section 8(o) of the United States Housing 

13 Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)). 

14 (c) LIMITATION ON FUNDING.—A public housing 

15 agency selected for participation pursuant to subsection 

16 (a) in the demonstration program referred to in such sub17 section shall not be provided any funding under section 

18 8 or 9 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 

19 U.S.C. 1437f, 1437g) in addition to the funding that such 

20 agency otherwise would receive absent such participation. 

21 (d) REPORTING OF FINANCIAL DATA.—In addition 

22 to other reporting requirements, all public housing agen23 cies participating in the demonstration program referred 

24 to in subsection (a) (whether pursuant to such subsection 

25 or otherwise) shall report financial data to the DepartVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:21 Jun 17, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4868.IH H4868

smartinez on DSK4TPTVNPROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4868 IH

1 ment of Housing and Urban Development as the Secretary 

2 of Housing and Urban Development shall specify to en3 sure that the effects of policy changes in the demonstra4 tion programs carried out by such agencies can be meas5 ured. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVNPROD with BILLS
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## Federal Grant Management Webinar

Join us! SJI is hosting a free webinar on Federal Grant Management on February 28th, 2022 from 1:00-3:00PM EST.

The webinar will provide an overview of the federal grant system, focusing on key grant management requirements set forth in the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the “Uniform Guidance”) codified at 2 C.F.R. Part 200 (and at 45 C.F.R. Part 75 for Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) awards).  

To register and for more information on the webinar, click here: Federal Grant Management Webinar (mailchi.mp)

Please feel free to share this with others who may have interest in these topics. 

### 

                    - Federal-Grant-Management  (63 kB)

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **