alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

## SJI Budget

A listing of the SJI budget documents from FY 2020 to FY 2025.

Congressional Budget Justification FY 2025

Congressional Budget Justification FY 2024

Congressional Budget Justification FY 2023

Congressional Budget Justification FY 2022

Congressional Budget Justification FY 2021

Congressional Budget Justification FY 2020

### 

                    - FY 2024 SJI Budget Request  (2 MB)
                    - FY-2024-SJI-Budget-Request-1  (2 MB)
                    - FY-2025-SJI-Budget-Request-1  (2 MB)
                    - FY 2020 SJI Budget Request  (2 MB)
                    - FY 2021 SJI Budget Request  (2 MB)
                    - FY 2022 SJI Budget Request  (2 MB)
                    - FY-2023-SJI-Budget-Request-6  (2 MB)
                    - FY-2022-SJI-Budget-Request-2  (2 MB)
                    - FY-2021-SJI-Budget-Request-2  (2 MB)
                    - FY-2020-SJI-Budget-Request-3  (2 MB)
                    - LI Banner  (231 kB)
                    - flag  (332 kB)

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 1 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1681 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:18:56 Page 9 of

9
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-01093-CV

ANGEL ADAMS, Appellant

V.

BRUCE DOAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1023716

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

According to information provided to this court, this appeal is from a 

judgment signed December 5, 2012. The record was due February 4, 2013, but it 

has not been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record informed the 

court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On February 7, 2013, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided 

this court with proof of payment for the record or filed any response to this court’s 

notice. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-5 for the fiscal year ended December 31,2023, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofAugust 24, 2022, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-5 and Citibank, N.A. (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been madeunder my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
By: /s/ Randy BockenstedtName: Randy BockenstedtTitle: Senior Vice President, CollectionsDate: March 29, 2024By: /s/ Jonathan WatsonName: Jonathan WatsonTitle: Executive Vice President, TreasurerDate: March 29, 2024
 
**
----

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

 

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of Premier Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack Gregory, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  August 8, 2011
|                               |
|------------------------------------|
| /s/ Jack Gregory                   |   |
| Jack Gregory                       |
| Chief Executive Officer,

Director |

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied DNA Sciences,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Karin
Klemm,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                           /s/ KARIN KLEMM
                           ---------------
                           Karin Klemm
                           Chief Financial Officer
                           August 15, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12175 and <greek-i>12176]


South Carolina Disaster <greek-i>SC-00011

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of South Carolina dated 05/14/2010.
    Incident: Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 04/25/2010.
    Effective Date: 05/14/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/13/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/14/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Darlington.
Contiguous Counties: South Carolina: Chesterfield, Florence, Kershaw, 
Lee, Marlboro.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.500
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.750
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12175 C 
and for economic injury is 121760.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are: South 
Carolina.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-12469 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Archibald Buchanan, Appellant, v. David Sloane, Respondent.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-10114 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JUAN GRAJEDA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-163-1
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Juan Grajeda-Gonzalez raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Newson , 515 F.3d 374 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that the Government may decline to move for an additional one-level reduction unde r United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3E1.1(b) based on the defend a n t ’ s r e f u s al to waive his right to appeal. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an e xtension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 21, 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-10114 Document: 00511964048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Sue Killgore Mobley, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00058

- CV v.
James A. Mobley, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2011

- 1426

- B ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment

of the court below. Therefore, we reverse the portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding attorney fees as sanctions and render judgment that James take nothing on his claim for attorney fees. We affirm the trial court’s partial summary judgment that Sue take nothing on her claims against James. We further order that the appellant and appellee shall each pay one half of all costs of appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 26 , 2016 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0063

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

NATHAN JENS FRANKFORTER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Mike Menahan, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2020

06/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0063
# States in the Senate | Florida

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Marco Rubio (R)***Hometown: Miami*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Rick Scott (R)***Hometown: Naples*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Florida became the 27th state to join the Union on March 3, 1845. Florida’s first two senators, James Westcott and David Levy Yulee, took office on July 1, 1845.  Florida’s longest-serving senators include Duncan Fletcher (1909-1936) and Spessard Holland (1946-1971). George Smathers, Daniel Robert (Bob) Graham, and Connie Mack all served in party leadership positions—Smathers as Democratic Conference secretary, Graham as Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee chair, and Mack as Republican Conference chair.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7026]


Review of the Designation of Ansar al-Islam (aka Ansar Al-Sunnah 
and Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to 
Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Records assembled in 
these matters pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2004 re-designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign 
terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 6, 2010.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-12440 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 05-50090

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. ZULMA PALMA-GOMEZ also known as, Emily Elizabeth Alvarez
Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-1521)

---------------------

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the

sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand the case to the Western District of Texas, El Paso

Division for resentencing is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative request

for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 14 days

________________

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set for th in 5 t h Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D July 7, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerkfrom the denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is

denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Romanul Gabriel Barbul, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No. opinion.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-3570

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Marcus Derby

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

____________

Submitted: September 23, 2019

Filed: November 4, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before KELLY, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Marcus Derby received a within-Guidelines-range, 96-month prison sentence

after pleading guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. 

On appeal, Derby argues that the district court1

erroneously denied him a minor1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.
participant adjustment. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). Derby was a supplier of drugs

distributed in the conspiracy. The district court found that, although Derby was less

culpable than the two leaders of the drug trafficking organization, he was not

substantially less culpable than the average participants, many of whom were streetlevel dealers. At sentencing, the district court commented that it may have never

heard argument for a minor-role adjustment made for an upstream supplier. 

Regardless, we agree with the district court’s finding that Derby cannot qualify for

a minor role adjustment given the facts of this case, see United States v. Cubillos, 474

F.3d 1114, 1120 (8th Cir. 2007); United States v. Thompson, 60 F.3d 514, 517 (8th

Cir. 1995), and we find no clear error in the district court’s ruling, United States v.

Brown, 929 F.3d 1030, 1041 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). Accordingly, we

affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4734 

To repeal the authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

to restrict mandatory pre-dispute arbitration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2014 

Mr. MCHENRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the authority of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection to restrict mandatory pre-dispute arbitration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau Arbitration 

5 Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT MANDATORY 

7 PRE-DISPUTE ARBITRATION. 

8 Section 1028 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

9 Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5518) is amended— 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4734 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) STUDY AND REPORT.—’’; 

2 and 

3 (2) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d). 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 4, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-934

Lower Tribunal No. 15-12831

________________

Mollie Zweig,

Appellant,

vs.

Il Villaggio Condominium Association, Inc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto,

Judge.

Siegfried, Rivera, Hyman, Lerner, De La Torre, Mars & Sobel, P.A., and

Nicholas D. Siegfried and Diane J. Zelmer, for appellant.

Halpern Rodriguez, LLP, and Marc A. Halpern and Priscilla S. Zaldivar, for

appellee.

Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

In the case below, the appellant unit owner filed a lawsuit seeking an

injunction to require the appellee condominium association to “refrain from
approving the vertical unit combination” of two units of a neighboring owner. The

trial court entered summary judgment against her because her lawsuit was not ripe. 

We affirm.

Although the condominium association’s board allowed the neighboring unit

owner’s engineer to preliminarily test a concrete slab to determine if combining the

units was structurally feasible, no application for permission to combine the units

had been filed. As the case stood at the time of summary judgment, therefore, the

application to combine the units may ultimately not be filed. If filed, the

application may not be approved, and if unlawfully approved, sufficient legal and

equitable remedies will exist to address any potential harm to the appellant unit

owner. In these circumstances, the claim that the unit owner might be harmed if an

application is filed, and if the application is granted, is too attenuated to support a

lawsuit. See Condos. on Intracoastal Ass’n, Inc. v. Barnett Bank of Palm Beach

Cty., 502 So. 2d 84, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (suit to bar association from

conducting a meeting to consider amendment to declaration of condominium was

premature because the “record contains no evidence to support a finding that the

members of the condominium association will in fact pass the amendment”). See

generally, Hernandez v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Hillsborough Cty., 153 So. 790, 791

(1934) (“Mere allegations that a board of county commissioners is threatening to

pass resolutions or edicts which, if passed, will be unlawful or ineffective,

2
constitute no ground for injunctive interference with the preliminary internal

functioning of the county board.”).

Affirmed.

3