alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,374
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,465
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     31,564
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          9,788
<ALLOWANCE>                                        230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,764
<DEPOSITS>                                      38,368
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                229
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  46,764
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    881
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,922
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   137
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,940
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,856
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,863
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,077
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (600)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (367)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.79)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        177
<LOANS-PAST>                                       716
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   506
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      276
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  230
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            216


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officers of Sunovia Energy Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(a)           The annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and





(b)           Information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   May 18, 2012





/s/ Mel Interiano


Mel Interiano, Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)








/s/ Erich Hofer


Erich Hofer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4794 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4794

 To prohibit the National Science Foundation from providing financial 
        support for travel to Antarctica by writers and artists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 30, 2014

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the National Science Foundation from providing financial 
        support for travel to Antarctica by writers and artists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    The National Science Foundation may not provide financial support 
for travel to Antarctica by writers and artists.
                                 <all>
```
#### State of Nebraska, appellant, v. James C. Baird, appellee.

471 N.W.2d 756

Filed July 19, 1991.

No. 91-082.

Joe Kelly, Deputy Lancaster County Attorney, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.

Caporale, J.

This case duplicates the situation presented in *State*v. *Baird, ante*p. 724, 472 N.W.2d 203 (1991), and is therefore controlled by the same rules and dismissed for the same reason.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4770 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4770

To amend title 46, United States Code, with respect to notices of claim 
               of maritime lien, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 29, 2014

Mr. Murphy of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 46, United States Code, with respect to notices of claim 
               of maritime lien, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coast Guard Regulation Relief Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. NOTICES OF CLAIM OF MARITIME LIEN.

    Section 31343 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (e) and inserting the following:
    ``(e)(1) A notice of claim of lien recorded under subsection (b) 
shall expire 3 years after the date on which such notice is recorded.
    ``(2) A person may re-record a notice that has expired under 
paragraph (1) or (3) if the person submits to the Secretary a 
declaration stating that the information in the notice remains true and 
correct to the best of the knowledge, information, and belief of the 
person.
    ``(3) A notice re-recorded under paragraph (2) shall expire 3 years 
after the date on which such notice was last re-recorded.
    ``(4) Expiration of a notice under this subsection may not be 
construed to have any effect on the validity of a claim of lien.''.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40799 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MANUEL CISNEROS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 88

- 11

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and GRAVES and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Manuel Cisneros challenges the 97

- month sentence imposed by the district court following his conviction of conspiring to possess with intent to
manufacture and distribute cocaine. Cisneros asserts that the district court erred by denying him a U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 reduction and that the Government breached the plea agreement by arguing against such a reduction at sentencing . The Government contends that it did not breach the plea

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 6, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40799 Document: 00514631156 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2018No. 17

- 40799

2 agreement and that Cisneros’s appeal is barred by the appellate waiver
contained therein

. As Cisneros himself had already voided the acceptance

- of

- responsibility stipulation contained in the plea agreement by using marijuana before sentencing, Cisneros’ s assertion that the Go vernment violated the stipulation
is not reasonable. See United States v. Hinojosa , 749 F.3d 407, 411 , 413 ( 5th Cir. 2014). Thus, even if Cisneros’s breach argument is afforded de novo review, it fails. See United States v. Purser , 747 F.3d 284, 290 (5th Cir. 2014).
Since the record shows that Cisneros knowingly and volun tarily agreed
to the appellate waiver contained in his plea agreement , and because the waiver applies to his remaining § 3E1.1 arguments, those arguments are barred. See United States v. Bond , 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. See id. at 546. Case: 17-40799 Document: 00514631156 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2018
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4911 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP Code for Glendale, New York. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2014 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a 

single, unique ZIP Code for Glendale, New York. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR GLENDALE, 

4 NEW YORK. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this section, the United States Postal Service shall 

7 designate a single, unique ZIP Code applicable to the area 

8 encompassing only Glendale, New York. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  QUARTERLY  REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER
30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  41
<SECURITIES>                                         9,341
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                  10
<DEPRECIATION>                                           8
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         63,553
<COMMON>                                           (65,040)
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,535
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       379
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        222
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    222
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARION FREDERICK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-506

[June 17, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562013CF003201A.

Rachael E. Reese of O’Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CJ., CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 24

- 10915
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ LUIS ANGEL LOPEZ,
Petitioner

- Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:20

- cv

- 01592

- SDM

- AEP

____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-10915 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 04/22/2024 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 24

- 10915

Before R OSENBAUM , N EWSOM , and L UCK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Luis Lopez, pro se , appeals the denial of a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 action

. He previously, through counsel, appealed the § 2255 judgment and we denied a COA in appeal no. 23

- 13259. To th e extent that Lopez is again challenging the district court’s denial of his § 2255 motion and a COA, the appeal is untimely. He had until November 10, 2023

— 60 days after the district court’s September 11, entry of final judgment

— to challenge the final ord er and judgment

. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) . However, he did not file his pro se notice of appeal until March 8, 2024

. Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin. , 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timelyfiling of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot entertain an appeal that is out of time). Additionally, a new challenge to the final order and judgment would be duplicative of appeal no. 23

- 13259, and th erefore , not properly before us

. See Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord , 449 U.S. 368, 374 (1981) (providing that a party “must ordinarily raise all claims of error in a single appeal following final judgment on the merits ”); I.A. Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson Nat’l Bank , 793 F.2d 1541, 1551

- 52 (11th Cir. 1986) (noting that we have inherent administrative power to dismiss duplicative litigation to avoid wasting USCA11 Case: 24-10915 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 04/22/2024 Page: 2 of 324

- 10915 Opinion of the Court 3 judicial resour ces). Further, any challenge to the district court’s or

our denial of a COA is procedurally improper. See Pruitt v. United States , 274 F.3d 1315, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001) (noting that the procedurally proper course of action for a party denied a COA by the district court is to file a renewed application for a COA with us) ; 11th Cir. 27

- 2 (providing that a party seeking to challenge our denial of a COA may file a motion for reconsideration with us within 21 days of the order’s entry )

. Accordingly, t his appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. Nopetition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 24-10915 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 04/22/2024 Page: 3 of 3
APPENDIX A: ACTIONS OF THE

JUNE 11, 2018, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves an Augmented Pay Scale for 19 Trust executive 

positons. [2018.06.01]

VOTED that the Board of Regents adopts the Consent Agenda, which constitutes the approval 

of all action items listed therein. [2018.06.02]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the minutes of the April 9, 2018, meeting of 

the Board of Regents.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed slate of candidates for 

appointment or reappointment to 13 Smithsonian advisory boards.



VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed amendments to the bylaws of 

the National Advisory Board of the Smithsonian Science Education Center.

VOTED that the Board of Regents recognizes the generosity of Land O’Lakes, Inc. and 

accepts the terms of the sponsorship agreement.

VOTED that the Board of Regents creates a quasi-endowment to support the mission of the 

National Museum of African American History and Culture. Further, the Board authorizes the 

transfer of the funds identified for this purpose. [2018.06.03]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed amendment to §5.05 of the Bylaws of 

the Board of Regents. [2018.06.04]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed amendments to the Finance 

Committee Charter. [2018.06.05]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed amendments to the bylaws of the 

Smithsonian National Board. [2018.06.06]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the fiscal year 2020 federal budget priorities 

proposed by the Secretary. [2018.06.07]

 

 Dr. Risa Lavizzo-Mourey recused from voting.
2

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves a five percent payout from the Smithsonian 

Endowment in fiscal year 2019 to support programmatic activity. The Board further approves 

up to an additional 0.75 percent payout from eligible Smithsonian Endowment funds in fiscal

year 2019 to support advancement activity. The payout shall be calculated against the trailing 

five-year average market value of the Smithsonian Endowment. [2018.06.08]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the creation of an unrestricted quasi-endowment in 

the amount of $10,000,000 from non-endowed reserves to support core operations of the 

Institution. [2018.06.09]
EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                         Jurisdiction of        % of Voting
                                        Incorporation or     Securities held at
        Name of Corporation               Organization       December 31, 2004
--------------------------------------  -------------------  -----------------

Consolidated subsidiaries:
   Ti-Pro, LLC                              Nevada                  90%
   TIMET Colorado Corporation               Colorado               100%
   TIMET Millbury Corporation               Oregon                 100%
     TIMET Castings Corporation             Delaware               100%
   TIMET Finance Management Company         Delaware               100%
   TIMET UK Limited                         United Kingdom         100%
     TIMET UK (EXPORT) Limited              United Kingdom         100%
     TIMET Europe Limited                   United Kingdom         100%
        TIMET Savoie, SA                    France                  70%
        TIMET Germany, GmbH                 Germany                100%
     Titanium MC Limited                    United Kingdom         100%
   Titanium Hearth Technologies, Inc.       Delaware               100%
   TMCA International, Inc.                 Delaware               100%
     Loterios SpA                           Italy                  100%
   TIMET Real Estate Corporation            Colorado               100%

Unconsolidated subsidiary:
   TIMET Capital Trust I                    Delaware               100%

Unconsolidated affiliates:
   MZI, LLC                                 Oregon                  33%
   VALTIMET SAS                             France                  44%
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WEIL:\97014481\2\67615.0014

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice)

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com)

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice)

(ray.schrock@weil.com)

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice)

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice)

(matthew.goren@weil.com)

767 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10153-0119

Tel: 212 310 8000

Fax: 212 310 8007

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP

Tobias S. Keller (#151445)

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com)

Jane Kim (#298192)

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com)

650 California Street, Suite 1900

San Francisco, CA 94108

Tel: 415 496 6723

Fax: 650 636 9251

Attorneys for Debtors

and Debtors in Possession

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case 

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Debtors.

☐Affects PG&E Corporation 

☐Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

☒Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case, 

No. 19-30088 (dm).

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2000-14 Filed: 05/14/19 Entered: 05/14/19 17:18:10 Page 1

of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

WEIL:\97014481\2\67615.0014

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF ORANGE

I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 

California that the following is true and correct:

I am an attorney employed in the State of California, and am a member of the bar of the 

State of California. I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen (18) years, and 

not a party to or interested in the within-entitled cause. My business address is One City 

Boulevard West, Fifth Floor, Orange, California 92868.

On April 30, 2019, I caused to be served the following documents:

 Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) and 9027 Enlarging the 

Time Within Which to File Notices of Removal of Related Proceedings (and 

supporting documents)

 By first class mail to the counsel of record to the following individuals, at their respective 

notification addresses listed below:

 Barbara J. Parker, Esq.

Michelle M. Meyers, Esq.

CITY ATTORNEY

One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor

Oakland, California 94612

Tel.: (510) 238-3815

Fax: (510) 238-6500

Attorney for Defendant City of Oakland

 Jody Struck, Esq.

HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN LLP

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800

Oakland, California 94612-3527

Tel.: (510) 763-2324

Fax: (510) 273-8534

Attorney for Defendant City of Oakland

Dated: April 30, 2019 ___________________________

Soniya D. Khemlani

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2000-14 Filed: 05/14/19 Entered: 05/14/19 17:18:10 Page 2

of 2