alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2673

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land to Eureka

County, Nevada, for continued use as cemeteries.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 6, 2000

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain

land to Eureka County, Nevada, for continued use as

cemeteries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 Congress finds that—

5 (1) the historical use by settlers and travelers

6 since the late 1800’s of the cemetery known as

7 ‘‘Maiden’s Grave Cemetery’’ in Beowawe, Nevada,

8 predates incorporation of the land on which the cem9 etery is situated within the jurisdiction of the Bu10 reau of Land Management; and
2

•S 2673 IS

1 (2) it is appropriate that that use be continued

2 through local public ownership of the parcel rather

3 than through the permitting process of the Federal

4 agency.

5 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO EUREKA COUNTY, NEVADA.

6 (a) CONVEYANCE.—The Secretary of the Interior,

7 acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Man8 agement (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’),

9 shall convey, without consideration, subject to valid exist10 ing rights, to Eureka County, Nevada (referred to in this

11 section as the ‘‘county’’), all right, title, and interest of

12 the United States in and to the parcel of land described

13 in subsection (b).

14 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land re15 ferred to in subsection (a) is the parcel of public land (in16 cluding any improvements on the land) known as ‘‘Maid17 en’s Grave Cemetery’’, consisting of approximately 10

18 acres and more particularly described as S1/2NE1/4SW1/

19 4SW1/4, N1/2SE1/4SW1/4SW1/4 of section 10, T.31N.,

20 R.49E., Mount Diablo Meridian.

21 (c) USE OF LAND.—

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—The county shall continue

23 the use of the parcel conveyed under subsection (a)

24 as a cemetery.
3

•S 2673 IS

1 (2) REVERSION.—If the Secretary, after notice

2 to the county and an opportunity for a hearing,

3 makes a finding that the county has discontinued

4 the use of the parcel conveyed under subsection (a)

5 as a cemetery, title to the parcel shall revert to the

6 Secretary.

7 (d) RIGHT-OF-WAY.—At the time of the conveyance

8 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall grant the county

9 a right-of-way allowing access for persons desiring to visit

10 the cemetery and other cemetery purposes over an appro11 priate access route.

Æ
ACTIONS OF THE SEPTEMBER 9, 2016, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the budget of appropriated funds for fiscal year 2017 when signed into 

law by the President, and authorizes expenditures by the Secretary in accordance therewith. 

Any material changes in program plans incorporated into the budget shall be made only with 

the approval of the Board of Regents or its Executive Committee.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2165 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 12:12:50 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2165 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 12:12:50 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2165 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 12:12:50 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2165 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 12:12:50 Page 4 of

4
19-30088

11

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1644 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 11:08:36 Page 1 of

2
April 17, 2019

Re: Mr. Hugh Massey Ray III, State Bar Number 24004246

To Whom It May Concern:

This is to certify that Mr. Hugh Massey Ray III was licensed to practice law in Texas on March 12, 

1998, and is an active member in good standing with the State Bar of Texas. "Good standing" means 

that the attorney is current on payment of Bar dues; has met Minimum Continuing Legal Education 

requirements; and is not presently under either administrative or disciplinary suspension from the 

practice of law. 

Seana Willing

Chief Disciplinary Counsel

SW/web

Sincerely,

This certification expires 30 days from the date, unless sooner revoked or rendered invalid by 

operation of rule or law.

P.O. BOX 12487, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2487, 512.427.1350; FAX: 512.427.4167

STATE BAR OF TEXAS

Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1644 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 11:08:36 Page 2 of

2
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 10.8


                AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 1998 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                                       OF
                            SS&C TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


     The 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") of SS&C Technologies, Inc. is
hereby amended as follows (capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein
shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan):

1.   Section 5(e) of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced
     with the following:

          "(e) Exercise of Option.  Options may be exercised by delivery to the
     Company of a written notice of exercise signed by the proper person or by
     any other form of notice (including electronic notice) approved by the
     Board together with payment in full as specified in Section 5(f) for the
     number of shares for which the Option is exercised."

2.   Section 8(b) of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with
     the following:

          "(b) Documentation.  Each Award shall be evidenced by a written
     instrument in such form as the Board shall determine, it being understood
     that an electronic form of Award shall be deemed to be a written instrument
     for purposes of the Plan. Each Award may contain terms and conditions in
     addition to those set forth in the Plan."

3.   Except as aforesaid, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



                    Adopted by the Board of Directors on October 19, 1999
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4812 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration to establish a process for providing expedited and 

dignified passenger screening services for veterans traveling to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor 

their service, and for other purposes. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4812 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor Flight Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. HONOR FLIGHT PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 49, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding after section 44927 the following new 

8 section: 

9 ‘‘§ 44928. Honor Flight program 

10 ‘‘The Administrator of the Transportation Security 

11 Administration shall establish, in collaboration with the 

12 Honor Flight Network or other not-for-profit organization 

13 that honors veterans, a process for providing expedited 

14 and dignified passenger screening services for veterans 

15 traveling on an Honor Flight Network private charter, or 

16 such other not-for-profit organization that honors vet17 erans, to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor 

18 the service of such veterans.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

20 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4812 RFS

1 after the item relating to section 44927 the following new 

2 item: 

‘‘44928. Honor Flight program.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
APPENDIX A: ACTIONS OF THE

JUNE 8, 2020, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the recognition of Bank of America’s $25 million 

commitment to support the “Race, Community and Our Shared Future” initiative. [2020.06.01]

VOTED that the Board of Regents confers the title of Regent Emeritus on John W. McCarter, Jr.,

with deep gratitude for the outstanding service he has provided, and will continue to provide, 

to the Board of Regents and the Smithsonian Institution. [2020.06.02] 

VOTED that the Board of Regents adopts the Consent Agenda, which constitutes the approval 

of all action items listed therein. [2020.06.03]

VOTED that the Board of Regents expresses its profound appreciation to the memory of 

the Honorable Sam Johnson, esteemed statesman, American hero, former Regent, and 

true friend of the Smithsonian Institution, and extends its heartfelt sympathies to the 

Johnson family.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the minutes of the April 6, 2020, 

teleconference meeting of the Board of Regents.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed slate of candidates for 

appointment or reappointment to six (6) Smithsonian Institution advisory boards.

VOTED Board of Regents approves the proposed amendments to the bylaws of the 

Smithsonian Science Education Center Advisory Board.

VOTED that the Board of Regents recognizes the generosity of SB Group US, Inc. and 

accepts the terms of the sponsorship agreement.

VOTED that the Board of Regents creates a quasi-endowment for the benefit of the 

Smithsonian American Art Museum to support its fellowship program. Further, the 

Board of Regents authorizes the transfer of the funds identified for this purpose.

VOTED that the Board of Regents creates a quasi-endowment for the benefit of the 

National Museum of the American Indian to support the museum’s conservation 

department. Further, the Board of Regents authorizes the transfer of the funds 

identified for this purpose.
2

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the fiscal year 2022 federal budget priorities 

proposed by the Secretary. [2020.06.04]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves a five percent payout from the Smithsonian 

Endowment in fiscal year 2021 to support programmatic activity. The Board further approves a 

0.5 percent payout from the Smithsonian Endowment in fiscal year 2021 to support 

advancement activity. The payout shall be calculated against the trailing five-year average 

market value of the Smithsonian Endowment. [2020.06.05]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4691 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the tax rate for 

excise tax on investment income of private foundations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2014 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself and Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the tax rate for excise tax on investment income of 

private foundations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF THE TAX RATE FOR THE EX4 CISE TAX ON INVESTMENT INCOME OF PRI5 VATE FOUNDATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4940(a) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘2 percent’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘1 percent’’. 

9 (b) ELIMINATION OF REDUCED TAX WHERE FOUN10 DATION MEETS CERTAIN DISTRIBUTION REQUIREVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:00 May 29, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4691.IH H4691

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4691 IH

1 MENTS.—Section 4940 of such Code is amended by strik2 ing subsection (e). 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0527

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MARCIAL MEJIA JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 22, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 15 2020

04/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0527
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 17, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, February 17, 2010, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

*The agenda will include various IRS issues.*

Dated: January 15, 2010.

Linda Rivera,

Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-1128 Filed 1-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No.'s 333-11759, 333-32785, 333-58999 and 333-86383) pertaining to the
1993 Amended Incentive Stock Plan, the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and
the 1996 Director Option Plan of Microcide Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report
dated February 8, 2000 with respect to the financial statements of Microcide
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1999.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 29, 2000
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

t0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148608

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Pl aintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148608

COA: 318095

Monroe CC: 12

- 040016

- FH

SHARON RUTH BROADWAY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Brian F. Lavin, President of NTS
Capital Corporation, the general partner of NTS-Properties Associates V, the general partner
of NTS-Properties V, a Maryland limited partnership (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1. |  | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period ended March
               31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 13, 2004

/s/ Brian F. Lavin

---

President of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates V,
General Partner of NTS-Properties V, a Maryland limited partnership

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 11


                     CityFed Financial Corp.
      Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                          ----------------
                                                                              JUNE 30,
                                                                              --------

                                                                     2001                2000
                                                                     ----                ----
<S>                                                                  <C>                 <C>
Computation of Loss Per Share:


 Weighted average number of shares outstanding                       18,715,609          18,715,609


 Loss applicable to common stock:(1)


   From continuing operations                                       $(4,313,000)       $(4,241,000)

   From discontinued operations                                     $         -        $(1,037,000)
                                                                    ------------       ------------

   Net loss                                                         $(4,413,000)       $(5,278,000)
                                                                    ============       ============


 Basic and diluted loss per share:


   From continuing operations                                            $(0.23)            $(0.23)

   From discontinued operations                                          $(  - )            $(0.05)
                                                                         -------            -------

   Net loss                                                              $(0.23)            $(0.28)
                                                                         =======            =======
</TABLE>





--------
(1) Losses  applicable to Common Stock are net of preferred  stock dividends for
the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 in the amount of $4,317,000.
Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-82453 on Form S-3 ofour report dated March 22, 2005 (March 21, 2006 as to the effects of the discontinued operationsdescribed in Note 4) relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule ofRoberts Realty Investors, Inc. and its subsidiary as ofDecember 31, 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2004and 2003appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2005./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPAtlanta, Georgia
J-A29023-23

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37

IN RE: JOSEPH MEYN

APPEAL OF: LOIS A. HUMES

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 207 WDA 2023

Appeal from the Order Entered January 20, 2023

In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Criminal Division at 

No(s): CP-02-MD-0004055-2022

BEFORE: BOWES, J., KUNSELMAN, J., and MURRAY, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY KUNSELMAN, J.: FILED: DECEMBER 11, 2023

Lois A. Humes appeals from an order vacating a prior order that granted 

her motion for return of property. We vacate the challenged order.

Lois Humes and Joseph Meyn petitioned the trial court for return of 

property on August 24, 2022, with an amended petition filed September 21, 

2022. The trial court heard the matter and granted the motion on December 

6, 2022.

On January 3, 2023, Christy Guyaux and Gary Guyaux moved to dismiss 

the petition. On January 11, 2023, the Guyauxs moved to vacate the order 

granting the petition. On January 19, 2023, the trial court heard the matter 

and granted the Guyauxs’ motion to vacate the December 6 order.

On January 30, 2023, Humes and Meyn moved for reconsideration. The 

Guyauxs filed a response on February 2, 2023. On February 10, 2023, the 

trial court denied reconsideration. On February 13, 2023, Humes and Meyn 
J-A29023-23

- 2 -

moved to strike the Guyeauxs’ motion. On February 17, 2023, Humes timely 

appealed the order of January 19, 2023. Humes and the trial court complied 

with Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1925.

In this appeal, Humes argues that the trial court lacked authority to 

vacate the December 6 order more than thirty days after it was entered. See

42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5505. By statute: “Except as otherwise provided or prescribed 

by law, a court upon notice to the parties may modify or rescind any order 

within 30 days after its entry, notwithstanding the prior termination of any 

term of court, if no appeal from such order has been taken or allowed.” Id.

The trial court agrees with Humes that on January 19, 2023, it lacked 

jurisdiction to vacate its order from December 6, 2022. Trial Court Opinion, 

7/11/23, at 5. Notably, all other parties in interest—Meyn, the Guyauxs, and 

the Commonwealth—have not provided any argument to the contrary. Given 

these facts, we follow the reasoning of the trial court and of Humes, and we 

vacate the order entered January 19, 2023.

Order entered January 19, 2023, vacated. Case removed from 

argument list.

DATE: 12/11/2023