alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2293    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 08:52:11    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2293    Filed: 05/31/19    Entered: 05/31/19 08:52:11    Page 2 of2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2134 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 10:45:43 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2134 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 10:45:43 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2134 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 10:45:43 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2134 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 10:45:43 Page 4 of

4
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<Table>
<Caption>
          SUBSIDIARY NAME               JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
          ---------------               ----------------------------
<S>                                     <C>
SS&C Ventures, Inc.                        Connecticut
SS&C Pacific, Inc.                         Delaware
SS&C Technologies Limited                  United Kingdom
SS&C Technologies Sdn. Bhd.                Malaysia
SS&C Technologies B.V.                     Netherlands
Shepro Braun Systems, Inc.                 Illinois
Quantra Software Corporation               Delaware
Savid International Inc.                   New Jersey
The Savid Group, Inc.                      New York
HedgeWare, Inc.                            Delaware
The Brookside Corporation                  Rhode Island
SS&C Technologies PTE Ltd.                 Singapore
SS&C Technologies, KK                      Japan
SSC Direct.com, Inc.                       Delaware
</Table>
#### Thomas Larke, an Infant, by Seneca Larke, Jr., His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. John Johnston, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Jenks, P. J., Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Rich, JJ., dissented.
ACTIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VIA ELECTRONIC BALLOT 

AUGUST 31, 2020

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the withdrawal, if necessary, of up to $6.8 million from the National 

Zoological Park’s unrestricted Endowment to fund trust operation during impact of COVID-19.
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## New Webinar Series: Recommended Practices for Incorporating Medication for Opioid Use Disorders in Therapeutic Courts

Register Today! National Judicial College‘s New Webinar Series: ‘Recommended Practices for Incorporating Medication for Opioid Use Disorders in Therapeutic Courts’ will assist judges who preside over treatment courts as well as criminal courts by exploring medically assisted treatment for opioid use disorders.

Webinar: Recommended Practices for Incorporating Medication for Opioid Use Disorders in Therapeutic Courts

When? January 20th, 2022 at 2PM EST.

Register here: Recommended Practices for Incorporating Medication for Opioid Use Disorders in Therapeutic Courts – The National Judicial College (judges.org)

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert Lee and Others, Respondents, *v.*The Village of College Point and Others, Appellants.

*Gertiorari*— *costs, when not taxable.*

An order of tlie General Term, made upon the return to a writ of certiorari issued to review an assessment, confirmed the assessment under review with costs to the defendants and against the relators to he taxed. Defendants sought to include in their hill of costs the sum of fifty dollars.

*Held,*that although that sum was allowable in the discretion of the court, yet, as that discretion had not been exercised, the defendants acquired no right to insert the same therein.

Appeal by the defendants, The Village of College Point and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 16th day of April, 1895, retaxing the costs in the *195above-entitled action and disallowing items of costs taxed, and which reduces the amount of the judgment entered in said action.

The order of the General Term which provided for costs in this action was as follows: “ Ordered, that the determination and proceedings of said defendants in opening and otherwise improving said Third avenue, between Eleventh and Thirteenth streets in said village, and the levying of the assessment therefor, and which were sought to be reviewed herein, be and the same are hereby in all respects confirmed, with costs to the defendants and against the relators to be taxed.”

*John J.*Gleason, for the appellants.

*O. B. Gould,*for the respondents.

Dykman, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the Special Term reversing the taxation of fifty dollars as costs to the defendants, which was allowed by the clerk. The proceeding was by certiorari, and the only question presented by the appeal now before us is whether, under the order of the General Term confirming their proceedings with costs to be taxed, the defendants could include in their bill of costs the sum of fifty dollars. That sum was allowable in the discretion of the court, but as that discretion was not exercised, the defendants acquired no right to insert the same in their bill of costs.

The order should, therefore, be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Brown, P. J., and Pratt, J., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Interested in being featured in our monthly newsletter and on 

our website?

We are looking for innovative projects related to our Priority Investment Areas to share with 

the court community and other stakeholders. The Project Spotlights will showcase the positive, 

long-lasting contributions SJI supported projects make in courts and communities across the 

country. If you are interested in having your project featured as a grantee spotlight, submit the 

following information to contact@sji.gov:

1. Organization Name

2. Contact person email address 

3. SJI Grant Number

4. Project Title

5. Information about your project that you would like to share (250 words or less)

6. Examples of materials to be featured as part of your spotlight, including:

• Highlights of products developed through your project

• Quotes from judges, court administrators, staff and/or court 

consumers

• Pictures

• Videos

• Media pieces and articles

7. Photo Release Form signed by the individual(s) featured in the photos and videos 

submitted granting permission to feature the materials in the newsletter and/or on 

the SJI website. Download the Photo/Video Release Form here.

We look forward to hearing about your successful projects and featuring the innovative work 

you are doing to support state and local courts!

Please email contact@sji.gov if you have any questions or would like more information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,331,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  507,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                   179,859
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,114,262
<PP&E>                                       1,742,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                 424,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,881,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,468,472
<BONDS>                                        693,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,831,448
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,058,906)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,881,014
<SALES>                                      6,657,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,671,014
<CGS>                                        1,541,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,998,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               220,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (32,837)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (815,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    70,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (885,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (885,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Jenniffer D. Deckard, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fairmount Santrol Holdings Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                                    
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | April 16, 2018                                                     
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Jenniffer D. Deckard                                           
|      |  | Jenniffer D. Deckard                                               
|      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4852-7676-0215 

44553.00001

Dennis F. Dunne (admitted pro hac vice) 

Samuel A. Khalil (admitted pro hac vice) 

MILBANK LLP 

55 Hudson Yards 

New York, New York 10001-2163 

Telephone: (212) 530-5000 

Facsimile: (212) 530-5219 

and 

Gregory A. Bray (SBN 115367) 

Thomas R. Kreller (SBN 161922) 

MILBANK LLP 

2029 Century Park East, 33rd Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (424) 386-4000 

Facsimile: (213) 629-5063 

Counsel for the Official Committee 

of Unsecured Creditors 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION 

 -andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) 

(Jointly Administered)

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case. 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 

BETWEEN OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF 

UNSECURED CREDITORS AND 

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TORT 

CLAIMANTS EXTENDING TIME TO 

RESPOND TO MOTION OF THE 

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TORT 

CLAIMANTS FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER 

APPROVING PROPOSED MODEL PROOF 

OF CLAIM FORM FOR FIRE CLAIMS 

AND RELATED PROCEDURES 

[No Hearing Requested] 

Signed and Filed: May 23, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

May 24, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2222 Filed: 05/23/19 Entered: 05/24/19 15:14:59 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

4852-7676-0215 

The Court having considered the Stipulation Between Official Committee of Unsecured 

Creditors and Official Committee of Tort Claimants Extending Time to Respond to Motion of the 

Official Committee of Tort Claimants for Entry of an Order Approving Proposed Model Proof of 

Claim Form for Fire Claims and Related Procedures (the “Stipulation”), entered into by the 

(i) Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “UCC”) appointed in the jointly administered 

chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) of the above-captioned debtors in possession, on the 

one hand; and (ii) Official Committee of Tort Claimants appointed in the Chapter 11 Cases (the 

“TCC” and together with the UCC, the “Parties”), on the other hand, filed on May 22, 2019; and, 

pursuant to such Stipulation and agreement of the Parties, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The time for the UCC to file and serve any response or opposition to the Motion 

(as defined in the Stipulation) is extended through 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on May 31, 2019. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 

Dated: May 22, 2019 

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 

/s/ Eric R. Goodman 

Eric R. Goodman 

Attorneys for Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

**END OF ORDER** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2222 Filed: 05/23/19 Entered: 05/24/19 15:14:59 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
-----------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Netsmart Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-3 (File Nos.
333-104565 and 333-91907) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-111389, 333-96015 and
333-101474) of our report dated February 15, 2002 on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2001, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.  In addition, we consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in the Registration Statements on the above Forms S-3.


/s/ Eisner LLP
-------------------------
Eisner LLP
New York, NY
March 19, 2004
#### JOSHUA HARRISON and JAMES HARRISON, Appellants, *v.*HENRY R. GLOVER and others, Respondents.

*Gomtraet*— interpretation *of*— Priee *of goods in mar7cet*— determined *by offer*— *not alone by sale.*

Appeal fi’om a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.

The action was brought upon a contract under which the plaintiffs, who were manufacturers of blankets, had intrusted the same to the defendants for sale.

*197The action arose under a clause of the contract which provided that: *“*It is hereby agreed that the blankets shall not be sold for less than those made by Dodson & Schofield, of Philadelphia, at the proper time for selling them.” The plaintiffs claimed that the blankets had been sold for less than the price at which the Philadelphia firm sold. The case has been already before the General Term, where it was held that the market-price might be proved as well by evidence of what they could be bought for, as by actual sales. *(Harrison*v. *Glover,*11 S. O. R. [4 Hun], 121.)

The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants had sold the blankets at a less price than that at which they were authorized to sell them, and claimed to recover the difference, with interest.

Upon the second trial it appeared that, in the fall of 1870, Claf-flin & Co. applied to one Wilson, the agent of the Philadelphia firm, to ascertain the price at which he would sell two or three hundred bales of blankets. Whereupon Wilson replied that he would sell them as low as any one; that Clafflin *&*Co. must not buy of the plaintiffs at thirty cents, as he would sell as low or less. Clafflin *& Go.*then applied to defendants, and told them that Wilson had offered the Philadelphia blankets at thirty cents; whereupon the defendants sold them at that price.

The referee found that the Philadelphia blankets were not actually sold as low as thirty cents during the season, but that the offer to sell at that price was actually made.

The court at General Term say: *“We*think this offer of the agent of Wilson to sell Dodson *&*Schofield blankets at thirty cents, or less, established the price as effectually as if the offer had been accepted and the blankets delivered under it. The market-price of the blankets was established by the announcement of the price the manufacturers would take for the article. The offer was real, and the defendants acted in good faith. If the offer was made merely as a device to fix a price for' plaintiffs’ goods, less than the price called for by the agent, it would establish nothing. The referee has not found that, and I do not see how he could under the evidence. The defendants were not benefited by the sale; they sold to entire strangers. Wilson does not really deny he made the offer ; Claffiin’s agent says he did. The referee finds the offer and does not find bad faith.

*198I think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.”

*Walter G.*Anthony, for the appellants. *Daniel T. Walden,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Babnaed, P. *J.;*

Pbatt, J., concurred.

Present — BaeNaed, P. J., Pbatt and Dyxman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
JK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0218

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RANDY LEE TYER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including June 5, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2020

03/26/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0218
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4812 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the Administrator of 

the Transportation Security Administration to establish a process for 

providing expedited and dignified passenger screening services for veterans traveling to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor 

their service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2014 

Mr. RICHMOND (for himself, Mr. HUDSON, and Mr. PALAZZO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration to establish a process for providing expedited and 

dignified passenger screening services for veterans traveling to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor 

their service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor Flight Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4812 IH

1 SEC. 2. HONOR FLIGHT PROGRAM. 

2 Title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 

3 after section 44927 the following new section: 

4 ‘‘§ 44928. Honor Flight Program 

5 ‘‘The Administrator of the Transportation Security 

6 Administration shall establish, in collaboration with the 

7 Honor Flight Network or other not-for-profit organization 

8 that honors veterans, a process for providing expedited 

9 and dignified passenger screening services for veterans 

10 traveling on an Honor Flight Network private charter, or 

11 such other not-for-profit organization that honors vet12 erans, to visit war memorials built and dedicated to honor 

13 the service of such veterans.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS