Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Patent and Trademark Office

          - [Docket No.: PTO-P-2010-0046]

# AGENCY:

United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is streamlining the procedure for the review of appeal briefs in                         *ex parte*                         reexamination proceeding appeals to increase the efficiency of the appeal process and reduce pendency of appeals. The Chief Judge of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) or his designee (collectively, “Chief Judge”), will have the sole responsibility for determining whether appeal briefs filed in                         *ex parte*                         reexamination proceeding appeals comply with the applicable regulations, and will complete the determination before the appeal brief is forwarded to the examiner for consideration. The examiner will no longer review appeal briefs for compliance with the applicable regulations. The USPTO expects to achieve a reduction in                         *ex parte*                         reexamination proceeding appeal pendency as measured from the filing of a notice of appeal to docketing of the appeal by eliminating duplicate reviews by the examiner and the BPAI. We are expecting further reduction in pendency because the streamlined procedure will increase consistency in the determination, and thereby reduce the number of notices of noncompliant appeal brief and non-substantive returns from the BPAI that require appellants to file corrected appeal briefs in                         *ex parte*                         reexamination proceeding appeals.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         The procedures set forth in this notice are effective on May 25, 2010.                    

*Applicability Date:*                         The appeal brief review procedure set forth in this notice is applicable to appeal briefs filed in                         *ex parte*                         reexamination proceedings on or after May 25, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Krista Zele, Case Management Administrator, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, by telephone at (571) 272-9797 or by electronic mail at:                         *BPAI.Review@uspto.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under the streamlined procedure for appeal brief review, upon the filing of an appeal brief in                     *ex parte*                     reexamination proceeding appeals, the Chief Judge will review the appeal brief to determine whether the appeal brief complies with 37 CFR 41.37 before it is forwarded to the Central Reexamination Unit or other Technology Center examiner for consideration. The Chief Judge will endeavor to complete this determination within one month from the filing of the appeal brief. To assist regular                     *ex parte*                     appeal appellants in complying with 37 CFR 41.37, the BPAI has previously posted checklists for notices of appeal and appeal briefs and a list of eight reasons                     *ex parte*                     appeal briefs have been held to be noncompliant, on the USPTO Web site at: [                    *http://www.uspto.gov/​ip/​boards/​bpai/​procedures/​guidance_​noncompliant_​briefs.jsp*]. If the appeal brief is determined to be compliant with 37 CFR 41.37, the Chief Judge will accept the appeal brief and forward it to the examiner for consideration. If the Chief Judge determines that the appeal brief is not compliant with 37 CFR 41.37 and sends appellant a notice of noncompliant brief requiring a corrected brief, appellant will be required to file a corrected brief within the time period set forth in the notice to avoid the dismissal of the appeal.                     *See*37 CFR 41.37(d). The Chief Judge will also have the sole responsibility for determining whether corrected briefs comply with 37 CFR 41.37, and will address any inquiries and petitions regarding notices of noncompliant briefs.                

                    The Chief Judge's responsibility for determining whether appeal briefs comply with 37 CFR 41.37 is not considered a transfer of jurisdiction when an appeal brief is filed, but rather is only a transfer of the specific responsibility of notifying appellant under 37 CFR 41.37(d) of the reasons for non-compliance. The Patent Examining Corps retains the jurisdiction over the                     *ex parte*                     reexamination proceeding to consider the appeal brief, conduct an appeal conference, draft an examiner's answer, and decide the entry of amendments, evidence, and information                           ( print page 29322)                        disclosure statements filed after the final rejection or after the filing of a notice of appeal. Furthermore, petitions concerning the refusal to enter amendments and/or evidence remain delegated to the Patent Examining Corps as provided in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 1002.02(b) and (c).                

                    Once the Chief Judge accepts the appeal brief as compliant, an examiner's answer will be provided in the                     *ex parte*                     reexamination proceeding if the examiner determines that the appeal should be maintained. The examiner will treat all pending, rejected claims as being on appeal. If the notice of appeal or appeal brief identifies fewer than all of the rejected claims as being appealed, the issue will be addressed by the BPAI panel. The jurisdiction of the                     *ex parte*                     reexamination proceeding will be transferred to the BPAI when a docketing notice is entered after the time period for filing a reply brief expires or the examiner acknowledges the receipt and entry of the reply brief. After taking jurisdiction, the BPAI will not return or remand the                     *ex parte*                     reexamination proceeding to the Patent Examining Corps for issues related to a noncompliant appeal brief.                

                    This notice does not apply to                     *inter partes*                     reexamination proceedings. The Office is considering a streamlined procedure for review of briefs filed in                     *inter partes*                     reexamination proceedings, in which the Chief Judge will also have the sole responsibility for determining whether briefs filed in                     *inter partes*                     reexamination proceedings comply with 37 CFR 41.37, 41.67, 41.68, and 41.71.                

Dated: May 18, 2010.

David J. Kappos,

Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-12534 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-16-P