alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>







<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,585,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,585,000
<PP&E>                                     123,106,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,405,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             118,350,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,841,000
<BONDS>                                     67,951,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,653,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               118,350,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,508,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,073,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,056,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,670,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,425,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,425,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                184,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,609,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.62)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John A. Featherman, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of September 30, 2004 of
First Chester County Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

November 15, 2004


/S/ John A Featherman III
-------------------------
John A. Featherman III
Chief Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4705 

To amend the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 to authorize 

the Secretary of Defense to decontaminate certain portions of the former 

bombardment area on the island of Culebra, Puerto Rico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2014 

Mr. PIERLUISI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 

to authorize the Secretary of Defense to decontaminate 

certain portions of the former bombardment area on 

the island of Culebra, Puerto Rico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF FORMER BOMBARDMENT AREA ON IS4 LAND OF CULEBRA, PUERTO RICO. 

5 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con6 gress that the statutory prohibition restricting environ7 mental cleanup of the former bombardment area on the 

8 island of Culebra, Puerto Rico, is a unique anomaly for 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4705 IH

1 the Department of Defense and its formerly used defense 

2 sites. 

3 (b) MODIFICATION OF RESTRICTION ON FEDERAL

4 DECONTAMINATION AUTHORITY.—Section 204(c) of the 

5 Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public 

6 Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668) is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new sentence: ‘‘The first sentence of this 

8 subsection shall not apply to the portions of the former 

9 bombardment area that were identified as having regular 

10 public access in the Department of Defense study entitled 

11 ‘Study Relating to the Presence of Unexploded Ordnance 

12 in a Portion of the Former Naval Bombardment Area of 

13 Culebra Island, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’ and dated 

14 April 20, 2012, which was prepared in accordance with 

15 section 2815 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Author16 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 

17 124 Stat. 4464).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

 

1 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(a)(1). 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21049

(Summary Calendar)

SYBIL A. KERRY and 

SHEILA A. SMITH,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

versus

WESTERN ATLAS INTERNATIONAL 

INCORPORATED, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-3870)

April 18, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

In this appeal from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment dismissing the TITLE VII 1 claims of Plaintiffs-Appellants

Sybil A. Kerry and Sheila A. Smith, based specifically on sex
2

discrimination in connection with a reduction in force (RIF) by

Defendant-Appellee Western Atlas International Incorporated

(Western), Kerry and Smith contend that the district court erred in

holding that Western had discharged its burden of production of a

non-discriminatory reason for its employment action; in failing to

consider certain evidence regarding Western’s financial distress

that allegedly caused the RIF; in failing to consider evidence of

Kerry’s and Smith’s superior qualifications; in failing to consider

evidence that would produce a genuine issue of fact as to the

pretextual nature of the job offer made by Western to Kerry; and in

failing to find that Western terminated only women in the RIF.

Kerry and Smith also assert error by the district court in its

disposition of their state law claims of intentional infliction of

emotional distress. 

In our de novo review on appeal, we have carefully considered

the arguments advanced by counsel in briefs to this court, the

summary judgment record on appeal, and the Memorandum and Opinion

of the district court. Based on this consideration, we are

convinced that the district court committed no reversible error in

granting Western’s Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims of

Kerry and Smith, including, without limitation, their state law

claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, agreeing

entirely with the reasons set forth by the district court in its

Memorandum and Opinion. Consequently, the district court’s summary

judgment dismissing the actions of Kerry and Smith is, in all
3

respects, 

AFFIRMED.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00425-CR

IN RE Patrick Keith SCHUH

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 6, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 21, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the 

trial court to rule on various pro se motions. However, in order to be entitled to mandamus 

relief, relator must establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2) was asked to perform the act; and (3) failed or refused to do so. In re 

Molina, 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding). When a 

properly filed motion is pending before a trial court, the act of giving consideration to and ruling 

upon that motion is ministerial, and mandamus may issue to compel the trial judge to act. See 

Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, orig. 

proceeding). However, mandamus will not issue unless the record indicates that a properly filed 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CR-0331, styled State of Texas v. Patrick Keith Schuh, in the 437th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela presiding. 
04-11-00425-CR

- 2 -

motion has awaited disposition for an unreasonable amount of time. See id. Relator has the 

burden of providing this court with a record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus relief. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a) (“Relator must file with the petition [ ] a certified or sworn copy of 

every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any 

underlying proceeding”); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 

833, 837 (Tex. 1992). 

Here, relator has not provided this court with a file stamped copy of his motions or any 

other documents to show that a properly filed motion is pending before the trial court and has 

been brought to the trial court’s attention. Additionally, relator asserts he filed his motions on 

May 13, 2011, just over a month before relator’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed in this 

court. Therefore, relator has failed to meet his burden that a properly filed motion has awaited 

disposition for an unreasonable amount of time. See id. 

Based on the foregoing, we conclude relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus 

relief. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of 

Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2348    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:24:22    Page 1 of7

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2348    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:24:22    Page 2 of7

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2348    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:24:22    Page 3 of7

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2348    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:24:22    Page 4 of7

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2348    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:24:22    Page 5 of7

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2348    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:24:22    Page 6 of7

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2348    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:24:22    Page 7 of7
- Untitled-1.pdf
- Untitled-2.pdf
- Untitled-3.pdf
#### Ellen Duffy, by Guardian, etc., v. New York Contracting Company—Pennsylvania Terminal.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3811

___________ Hayward Cleveland, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Arkansas State Hospital, * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Defendant, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Arkansas Partnership Program, * * Appellee, * * Probate Court of Arkansas, * * Defendant. *

___________ Submitted: June 10, 2003 Filed: June 12, 2003

___________ Before BOWMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Hayward Cleveland appeals the district court’s 1 order granting summary judgment to defendant Arkansas Partnership Program, and dismissing without prejudice his action challenging his continuing civil commitment. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude summary judgment was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Great Neck Plaza, L.P., as Substituted for The Bank of New York, Respondent, v North Shore Mart, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Thomas P. Puccio, as Executor of the Estate of Saul Birnbaum, Deceased, Nonparty Appellant.

Submitted October 16,1995;

decided November 30, 1995

Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made on behalf of *842North Shore Mart, dismissed upon the ground that that movant is not a party aggrieved (CPLR 5511); motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made on behalf of Thomas P. Puccio, dismissed upon the ground that as to that movant, the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Addressing Emerging Infectious Diseases and 
Related Public Health Concerns in India, Funding Opportunity 
Announcement (FOA) GH10-002, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 11 a.m.-2 p.m., July 1, 2010 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Addressing Emerging Infectious Diseases and Related 
Public Health Concerns in India,'' FOA GH10-002.
    Contact Person for More Information: Hylan D. Shoob, PhD, 
M.S.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-4796.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-12356 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Knoll, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Andrew B. Cogan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:



March 1,
2011

/s/ ANDREW B. COGAN Andrew B. CoganChief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 31**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR18 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

Date:  March 15, 2007

 

  /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann_________Name:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March

23, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00669-CR

NELSON RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1573790

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Nelson Ramirez has signed and filed a written request to dismiss 

his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Because this court has not delivered an 

opinion, we grant appellant’s request.

We dismiss the appeal. We direct the clerk of the court to issue the mandate 
2

of the court immediately. See Tex. R. App. P. 2.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant. 

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of ICOA, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended  September 30, 2003
of the Company fully complies,  in all material respects,  with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and
information  contained in the Form  10-QSB/A  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  March 19, 2004                         By: /s/  George Strouthopoulos
                                                   -------------------------
                                                       George Strouthopoulos,
                                                       Chairman   and   Chief
                                                       Executive Officer

                                              By: /s/  Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.
                                                   -----------------------
                                                       Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.,
                                                       Chief Financial  Officer,
                                                       Secretary,  Treasurer and
                                                       Director (Principal
                                                       Accounting Officer)