alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. WILLIAM R. GRACE and Others, Respondents, *v.*SYLVESTER GRAY and Others, Assessors of Long Island City, Appellants.

Certiorari *to review erroneous assessments*—1880, *chap.*369.,

A motion to quash a writ oí *certiorari*issued to review assessments for taxation under chapter 269 of 1880, upon the ground that neither the petition nor the . writ show that the relators ever appeared before the assessors or made any objection during the period in which the assessments were open for inspection and corrections, should not he granted.

Appeal from an order made at the Kings County Special Term, and entered in Queens county, denying a motion to vacate a writ of *certiorari*to review assessments for taxation on real estate in Long Island City and referring the matter to a referee to take proofs. The motion to quash was made on the filing of the return and was based on the defect claimed to exist, both in the petition and the writ, that they did not show that the relators had ever appeared before the assessors or made any objection during the period while the assessment-rolls were open for inspection and corrections

W. *J. Foster,*for the appellants.

*Geo. F.*Blackwell, for the respondents

Barnard, P. J.:

If the writ of *certiorari*should be quashed there would be no trial according to chapter 269, Laws of 1880. The several petitioners aver an inequality in the assessment in respect to the individual case of the particular petitioner, and by the act they are properly joined. The return is not final, and when the parties desire to give evidence in support of their petition the court may take evidence. *244Tliis testimony by tlie act “ shall constitute a part of the proceedings upon which the determination of the court shall be made.” The act, therefore, was designed to destroy, in respect to the writ of *certiorari*to review assessments, the conclusiveness of the return. A new tribunal was made with power to review the case upon the return and any evidence taken in support of the petitioners. The only condition to the allowance of the writ is that it shall be allowed within fifteen days after the completion and delivery of the assessment-roll and the posting or publishing notice thereof as required by the act. There are facts which can be disputed by evidence in the face of a return to the contrary. The case of *The People ex rel. Mutual Union Telegraph Company*v. *Commissioners of Taxes*(99 N. Y., 254), arose in the city of New York. The court held that the law of 1880 did not dispense with the provision of chapter 302, Laws of 1859 in relation to assessments in the city of New York. The order should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Pratt, J., concurred.

Order affirmed with costs and disbursements.
#### Donalena Hopkins, Appellant, v. Harry A. Hopkins, Respondent.

Order affirmed. No opinion; •
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1697 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 12:38:04 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1697 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 12:38:04 Page 2 of

4
EXHIBIT A

Standard Parties Email Service List

Served via Email

DESCRIPTION NAME NOTICE NAME EMAIL

Counsel to Debtors Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

Attn: Stephen Karotkin, Jessica Liou, 

Matthew Goren 

stephen.karotkin@weil.com

matthew.goren@weil.com

jessica.liou@weil.com

Proposed Special Counsel to Debtors Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

Attn: Paul H. Zumbro, Kevin J. Orsini, 

George E. Zobitz, Stephen M. Kessing 

and Nicholas A. Dorsey, Omid H. 

Nasab

pzumbro@cravath.com

korsini@cravath.com

jzobitz@cravath.com

skessing@cravath.com

ndorsey@cravath.com

onasab@cravath.com

Counsel to Debtors Keller & Benvenutti LLP Attn: Tobias Keller, Jane Kim

tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com

jkim@kellerb envenutti.com

Office of the United States Trustee Office of the United States Trustee 

Attn: James L. Snyder, Esq. & Timothy 

Lafreddi, Esq., Lynette C. Kelly, Marta 

E. Villacorta

James.L.Snyder@usdoj.gov

timothy.s.laffredi@usdoj.gov

lynette.c.kelly@usdoj.gov

Marta.Villacorta@usdoj.gov

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Milbank LLP

Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Samuel A. 

Khalil, Paul S. Aronzon, Gregory A. 

Bray, Thomas R. Keller

ddunne@milbank.com

skhalil@milbank.com

Paronzon@milbank.com

Gbray@milbank.com

TKreller@milbank.com

Counsel for the administrative agent under the Debtors' 

debtor in possession financing facilities Stroock & Stoock & Lavan LLP

Attn: Kristopher M. Hansen, Erez E. 

Gilad, Matthew G. Garofalo, Frank A. 

Merola

khansen@stroock.com

egilad@stroock.com

mgarofalo@stroock.com

fmerola@stroock.com

Counsel for the agent under the Debtors’ proposed debtor in 

possession financing facilities Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

Attn: Eli J. Vonnegut, David Schiff, 

Timothy Graulich

eli.vonnegut@davispolk.com

david.schiff@davispolk.com

timothy.graulich@davispolk.com

Counsel to California Public Utilities Commission

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & 

Garrison LLP

Attn: Alan W. Kornberg, Brian S. 

Hermann, Walter R. Rieman, Sean A. 

Mitchell, Neal P. Donnelly

akornberg@paulweiss.com

bhermann@paulweiss.com

wrieman@paulweiss.com

smitchell@paulweiss.com

ndonnelly@paulweiss.com

Interested Party United States on behalf of the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission U.S. Department of Justice Attn: Danielle A. Pham danielle.pham@usdoj.gov

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1697 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 12:38:04 Page 3 of

4
EXHIBIT B

Standard Parties Hardcopy First Class Mail Service List

Served via First Class Mail

DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS

Debtors

PG&E Corporation and 

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Attn: Janet Loduca

77 Beale Street

P.O. Box 770000

San Francisco, CA 94105

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Attn: General Counsel

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1697 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 12:38:04 Page 4 of

4
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-90037,
333-64785, 333-06395, 333-10583 and 333-33323) of En Pointe Technologies, Inc. of our report dated November 29, except for Notes 1
and 3 as to which the date is December   , 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/
PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
December  , 2001

---

QuickLinks
ACTIONS OF THE AUGUST 15, 2023, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, recognizes the generosity of the National Science Foundation to the National Air 

and Space Museum and names the National Science Foundation Discovering Our Universe 

Gallery, for a minimum of 10 years.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed slate of candidates for appointment or reappointment to 11 

Smithsonian Institution Advisory Boards.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed amendments to the bylaws of the Smithsonian 

Astrophysical Observatory Advisory Board.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed amendments to the bylaws of the Smithsonian Tropical 

Research Institute Advisory Board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIALS IN 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      10,804,064
<SECURITIES>                                22,908,833
<RECEIVABLES>                                  783,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (50,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,697,666
<PP&E>                                       2,850,470
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,281,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,266,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,860,950
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,069
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,390,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,266,212
<SALES>                                      5,647,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,647,209
<CGS>                                        5,131,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,131,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,021,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,884,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,621,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,936
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,636,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,636,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Constance B. Moore hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 10-K) of BRE Properties, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BRE Properties, Inc.



|                         |  |                                                         
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 15, 2008 |  | /s/ Constance B. Moore                                  
|                         |  | Constance B. Moore President and Chief Executive
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2498 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2498

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2000

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, construct, 
 and equip laboratory, administrative, and support space to house base 
operations for the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Submillimeter 
              Array located on Mauna Kea at Hilo, Hawaii.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FACILITY AUTHORIZED.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to plan, design, construct, and equip laboratory, administrative, and 
support space to house base operations for the Smithsonian 
Astrophysical Observatory Submillimeter Array located on Mauna Kea at 
Hilo, Hawaii.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Board of Regents of 
the Smithsonian Institution to carry out this Act, $2,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2001, and $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2002, which shall 
remain available until expended.

            Passed the Senate June 14, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 97 (Thursday, May 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28294-28295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The Applied Nanotechnology Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 26, 2010, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Applied Nanotechnology 
Consortium (``TANC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Connecticut Center for Advanced Technology, Inc., 
East Hartford, CT; Ensign-Bickford

[[Page 28295]]

Aerospace and Defense, Simsbury, CT; GKN Aerospace Services Structures 
Corporation, Cromwell, CT; Imperial Machine Tool Co., Columbia, NJ; 
Kaman Precision Products-Fuzing, Middletown, CT; University of 
Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT; University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and 
the University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT. The general areas of 
TANC's planned activities are to perform coordinated planning and 
research and development prototype efforts designed to encompass the 
following as it relates to nanotechnology: (a) Nanoparticle Production 
Methods/Processing of Nano Composites; (b) Laser Processing of Nano-
Composite Materials; (c) Nanotech Education; (d) Nano Energetics and 
Safe & Arming Solutions; and (e) Advanced Structural Materials and 
Systems.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-12031 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCPW-12-0000104 

02-MAR-2012 

09:37 AM 

NO. SCPW-12-0000104
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

CLYDE MITSURU HAYAKAWA, Petitioner,
 

vs.
 

THE HONORABLE RANDAL K.O. LEE, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT


COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent. 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

(S.P.P. NO. 11-1-0033)
 

ORDER
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of petitioner Clyde Hayakawa's 

petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that, in S.P.P. No. 

11-1-0033, Clyde Mitsuru Hayakawa v. State of Hawai'i, respondent 

State of Hawai'i filed an answer to the HRPP Rule 40 petition on 

December 1, 2011. Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to 

mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 

P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary 

remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a 

clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative 
means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the
 

requested action.). Accordingly,
 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
 

mandamus is denied.1
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 2, 2012. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

1 It appears that petitioner may not have been served with the 

answer to the Rule 40 petition filed by respondent State of Hawai'i on 

December 1, 2011 in S.P.P. No. 11-1-0033. If so, the respondent judge 

shall direct the State of Hawai'i to serve the answer on petitioner in 

accordance with HRPP 49. 

2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

1 0 

1 1 

1 2 

1 3 

1 4 

1 5 

1 6 

1 7 

1 8 

1 9 

2 0 

2 1 

2 2 

2 3 

2 4 

2 5 

2 6 

2 7 

2 8 

De n nis F. D u n ne (a d mitte d pr o h ac vice ) Sa m uel A. K halil (a d mitte d pr o h ac vice ) MI L B A N K L L P 

5 5 H u ds o n Yar ds 

Ne w Y or k, Ne w Y or k 1 0 0 0 1- 2 1 6 3 

Tele p h o ne: ( 2 1 2) 5 3 0- 5 0 0 0 

Facsi mile: ( 2 1 2) 5 3 0- 5 2 1 9 

a n d 

Gre g or y A. Bra y ( S B N 1 1 5 3 6 7) 

T h o mas R. Kreller ( S B N 1 6 1 9 2 2) 

MI L B A N K L L P 

2 0 2 9 Ce nt ur y Par k East, 3 3r d Fl o or 

L os A n geles, C A 9 0 0 6 7 

Tele p h o ne: ( 4 2 4) 3 8 6- 4 0 0 0 

Facsi mile: ( 2 1 3) 6 2 9- 5 0 6 3 

C o u nsel f or t he Offici al C o m mittee 

of U nsec ure d Cre dit ors

U NI T E D S T A T E S B A N K R U P T C Y C O U R T 

N O R T H E R N DI S T RI C T O F C A LI F O R NI A 

S A N F R A N CI S C O DI VI SI O N 

I n re: 

P G & E C O R P O R A TI O N 

 - a n d - 

P A CI FI C G A S A N D E L E C T RI C 

C O M P A N Y,

De bt ors.

Case N o. 1 9- 3 0 0 8 8 ( D M) 

C ha pter 1 1 

( Lea d Case) 

(J oi ntl y A d mi nistere d) 

N O TI C E O F WI T H D R A W A L O F 

S T A T E M E N T O F N O O B J E C TI O N 

Date: Ma y 9, 2 0 1 9 

Ti me: 9: 3 0 a. m. ( Pacific Ti me) 

Place: U nite d States Ba n kr u ptc y C o urt 

 C o urtr o o m 1 7, 1 6t h Fl o or 

 4 5 0 G ol de n Gate A ve n ue 

 Sa n Fra ncisc o, C A 9 4 1 0 2 

Re: D oc ket N o. 1 9 0 8 

Affects P G & E C or p orati o n 

Affects Pacific Gas a n d Electric 

C o m pa n y 

   Affects b ot h De bt ors 

 All p a pers s h all be file d i n t he Le a d C ase, 

N o. 1 9- 3 0 0 8 8 ( D M) . 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1913 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 10:35:24 Page 1 of

2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

44553.00001

1. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”) hereby 

withdraws its Statement of No Objection Regarding Certain Matters Scheduled for May 9, 2019 

Hearing (the “Statement”) [Docket No. 1908], filed May 8, 2019. The Committee reserves all rights 

with respect to the relief requested in the motions and application set forth in the Statement. 

Dated: May 8, 2019 

MILBANK LLP 

/s/ Thomas R. Kreller . 

DENNIS F. DUNNE 

SAMUEL A. KHALIL 

GREGORY A. BRAY 

THOMAS R. KRELLER 

Counsel for the Official Committee of 

Unsecured Creditors 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1913 Filed: 05/08/19 Entered: 05/08/19 10:35:24 Page 2 of

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,411
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,787
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     10,985
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          24,361
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            23,028
<LOANS>                                        151,945
<ALLOWANCE>                                        983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,572
<DEPOSITS>                                     120,491
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,151
<LONG-TERM>                                     62,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,843
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 200,572
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,583
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,395
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   216
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,194
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,525
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,532
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,662
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      438
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  73
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,380
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,380
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       851
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.10
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,127
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    346
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   571
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       26
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  983
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               895
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             88


</TABLE>