alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# William Knowland: A Featured Biography

**

----

William Knowland of California was introduced to politics at a young age by his father, congressman and newspaper publisher Joseph Knowland. Elected to the California state assembly in 1932, Knowland quickly rose through party ranks to gain a leadership position in the Republican National Committee. While serving in the army he was appointed by Governor Earl Warren to fill a vacancy in the U.S. Senate, where he again rose to leadership. He became chair of the Republican Policy Committee in 1953 and was elected Republican floor leader following the death of Senator Robert Taft later that year. A fierce anti-communist, Knowland strongly supported Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalist China. But his most notable accomplishment came with floor management of the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Knowland did not seek a third Senate term in 1958, choosing instead to run for governor. Following a tough primary battle and a crushing loss to Democrat Pat Brown, Knowland left politics and became publisher of the Oakland Tribune. 

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
94th Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 94-606

VETO OF THE ELECTRIC AND HYBRID VEHICLE 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION ACT OF 1976

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OP THE UNITED STATES

VETOING

H.R. 8800, AX ACT TO AUTHORIZE IX THE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION A FEDERAL PROGRAM OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION DESIGNED TO PROMOTE ELECTRIC VEHICLE

TECHNOLOGIES AND TO DEMONSTRATE THE COMMERCIAL

FEASIBILITY OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES

S eptember 13, 1976.—Message and accompanying act ordered to be

printed as a House Document

57-011 o

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 1976
To the House of Representatives: I am returning, without my approval, H.R. 8800, the “Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Research, Development and Demonstration Act of 1976.” This bill would establish a five-year, $160 million research, develop­ ment and demonstration project within the Energy Research and De­ velopment Administration (ERDA) to promote the development of an electric vehicle that could function as a practical alternative to the gasoline-powered automobile. One of the major objectives of the project would be the development and purchase by the Federal gov­ ernment of some 7,500 demonstration electric vehicles. Such develop­ ment would cover some of the areas private industry stands ready to 

pursue. It is well documented that technological breakthroughs in battery research are necessary before the electric vehicle can become a viable option. It is simply premature and wasteful for the Federal govern­ ment to engage in a massive demonstration program—such as that intended by the bill—before the required improvements in batteries for such vehicles are developed. ERDA already has adequate authority under the Energy Reorgani­ zation Act of 1974 and the Federal Non-nuclear Energy Research and Development Act of 1974 to conduct an appropriate electric vehi­ cle development program. Under my fiscal year 1977 budget, ERDA will focus on the research areas that inhibit the development of prac­ tical electric vehicles, for wide-spread use by the motoring public. In­ cluded is an emphasis on advanced battery technology. Even assuming proper technological advances, the development of a completely new automobile for large-scale production is a monu­ mental task requiring extensive investment of money and years of development. While the Government can play an important role in exploring particular phases of electric vehicle feasibility—especially in the critical area of battery research—it must be recognized that private industry already has substantial experience and interest in the development of practical electric vehicle transportation. I am not prepared to commit the Federal government to this type of a massive spending program which I believe private industry is best able to undertake.

The White H ouse, September 13,1976.

(m )

Gerald R. F ord.
EXHIBIT-23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-12029  on Form  S-8 of The  Lamaur  Corporation  (formerly  Electronic  Hair
Styling, Inc.) of our report dated March 26, 1997 on the financial statements of
The Lamaur Corporation and of our report dated January 24, 1996 on the financial
statements of PCD, the Personal Care  division of DowBrands  L.P.  (which report
expresses an unqualified  opinion on such  financial  statements and includes an
explanatory paragraph referring to PCD's basis of presentations), both appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Lamaur  Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1996.



Deloitte & Touche LLP
San Francisco, California
March 26, 1997
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6481
ROBERT A. CUFFEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Y. COLEMAN, Head RN Nurse, Lawrenceville Correctional Center, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-2) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: July 24, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert A. Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert A. Cuffee appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failing to respond to the filing fee order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeCuffee v. Coleman , No. CA-03-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 5, 2003; entered Mar. 6, 2003). We also deny Cuffee’s motion for show cause. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Applied DNA
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gerhard H. Wehr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Gerhard H. Wehr
-------------------
    Gerhard H. Wehr
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 21, 2004
#### William O. Johnson, Appellant, v. Archibald S. White, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Exhibit A

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-1 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 1

of 2
Recorded No. Amount Recorded No. Amount

1 2–9 21‐18‐347 San Mateo 3/1/2019 2019‐014384 $33,261.69 5/22/2019 2019‐038550 $1,273.62 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $31,988.072 10–17 21‐18‐351 San Mateo 3/1/2019 2019‐014387 $24,429.62 5/22/2019 2019‐038551 $808.82 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $23,620.803 18–24 21‐18‐378 Monterey 3/4/2019 2019008496 $659,509.25 5/22/2019 2019020564 $74,781.59 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $584,727.664 25–31 21‐18‐368 San Francisco 3/6/2019 2019K739834 $32,313.72 5/22/2019 2019K769926 $100.00 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $32,213.725 32–38 21‐17‐422 Alameda 3/7/2019 2019042224 $13,314.68 5/22/2019 2019096321 $942.71 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $12,371.976 39–42 21‐17‐428 Santa Clara 3/6/2019 24129633 $195,725.12   Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $195,725.127 43–51 21‐18‐359 Merced 3/19/2019 2019007752 $62,491.39 5/22/2019 2019014680 $2,490.92 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $60,000.478* 52–58 21‐18‐391 Santa Clara 3/27/2019 24143478 $24,894.75 5/22/2019 24185762 $3,376.98 Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. $21,517.77

Total:  $962,165.58

* This lien amends and resates a lien recorded in Santa Clara County on 2/26/2019 as document number 24129909.

Against Remaining

Exhibit A ‐ Index of Recorded Liens and Partial Releases

Lien information Partial release information

Ref. no. Ex. B. pp. Job no. County

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2232-1 Filed: 05/28/19 Entered: 05/28/19 08:29:01 Page 2

of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

July 17, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00296

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I. J. P., a Child

, From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 00001 Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4893 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4893

  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for the non-
application of the waiting period for disability insurance benefits in 
     cases of terminally ill beneficiaries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2014

Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for the non-
application of the waiting period for disability insurance benefits in 
     cases of terminally ill beneficiaries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jeremy Sanchez Social Security 
Disability Insurance Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. NON-APPLICATION OF WAITING PERIOD FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE 
              BENEFITS IN CASES OF TERMINALLY ILL BENEFICIARIES.

    Section 223(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3)(A) In the case of any application for disability 
        insurance benefits filed by an individual who is determined to 
        be under a disability, paragraph (1) shall be applied without 
        regard to the waiting period referred to in such paragraph if--
                    ``(i) the individual is terminally ill, or
                    ``(ii) the Commissioner of Social Security 
                determines that the application of the waiting period 
                would work an undue hardship on such individual (as 
                determined on the basis of criteria established by the 
                Commissioner).
            ``(B) For the purposes of this paragraph, an individual is 
        considered to be terminally ill if the individual has a medical 
        prognosis that the individual's life expectancy is 12 months or 
        less.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall apply with respect to 
applications for monthly insurance benefits filed on or after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
ACTIONS OF THE AUGUST 10, 2021, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, appoints Soledad O’Brien to the Board of Trustees of the National Museum of the

American Latino for a one-year term, effective immediately.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, appoints Barbara M. Barrett to the Smithsonian American Women’s History

Museum Council as the Regent Representative, effective immediately.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, appoints Lynda Carter, Edna Kane-Williams, and Billie Jean King to the Smithsonian

American Women’s History Museum Council for one-year terms each, effective immediately.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, appoints S. Mona Sinha to the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum

Council for a two-year term, effective immediately.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, appoints Martine A. Rothblatt to the Smithsonian American Women’s History

Museum Council for a three-year term, effective immediately.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed slate of candidates for appointment or reappointment to 

ten (10) Smithsonian Institution Advisory Boards.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, approves the reappointment of Magdalene (“Maggie”) Johnson Obaji as Chair of 

the National Museum of African Art Advisory Board for an exceptional one-year extension of

leadership service, effective immediately.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to

Board Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed amendments to the bylaws of the Asian

Pacific American Center Advisory Board.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to

Board Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed amendments to the bylaws of the National

Portrait Gallery Commission.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to

Board Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed amendment to the bylaws of the Smithsonian

Science Education Center.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Michael F. Biehl, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fairmount Santrol Holdings Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                                                                  
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | April 16, 2018                                                                                   
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Michael F. Biehl                                                                             
|      |  | Michael F. Biehl                                                                                 
|      |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32


                             REX STORES CORPORATION
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned officers of REX Stores Corporation (the "Company")
hereby certify, to their knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2006, which this certificate accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Stuart A. Rose
------------------------
Stuart A. Rose


/s/ Douglas L. Bruggeman
------------------------
Douglas L. Bruggeman


Dated:  December 8, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,226,691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  387,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,640,218
<PP&E>                                         187,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                 227,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,039,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          596,539
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,729
<OTHER-SE>                                     740,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,039,638
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               872,521
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,756,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (75,138)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,808,955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,808,955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)
        

</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2152 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:29:29 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2152 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:29:29 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2152 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:29:29 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2152 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:29:29 Page 4 of

4
NUMBER 13-23-00064-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN RE CHELETTE BAKER, SAMANTHA GARCIA, AND KARMEN 

SCHUSTER

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Peña

Order Per Curiam

On February 15, 2023, relators Chelette Baker, Samantha Garcia, and Karmen 

Schuster filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to either 

transfer the underlying case to the 23rd District Court of Matagorda County, Texas, or 

alternatively, “to require the trial court to accomplish the assignment of this case to a 

statutory probate court judge.” We request the real parties in interest, Annie Findley 

Jones, independent administrator of the estate of Harold Jack Findley; Luther Hotel, Inc.; 
2

and “unknown heirs”1 represented by Philip J. Hundl; or any others whose interest may 

be directly affected by the relief sought, to file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus within ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4, 52.8. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

17th day of February, 2023.

1 We note that the “unknown heirs” appear to be identified in the mandamus record as: Kenneth 

Findley, Shelby Jean Hayes, Anthony Stephen Findley, Danielle Craven, Tyler Wade, Landon Wade, 

Richard Donald Findley, Linda Gail Flowers, Craig Steven Yancy, Jonathan Chad Yancy, Tristian Ray 

Samuel Yancy, Lauren Kay Elizabeth Yancy, Susan Rene Witkowski, Carolyn Treece, Denise Munza, 

Thomas Heath Back, Donna Dennis, Joseph Dan Findley, Darla Gayle Phillips, Ronald Darren Findley, 

Debbie Lynn Busby, Timothy John Clifton, Patrick Newley, Zachary Newley, Benji Dale Clifton, Annie Ruth 

Findley Jones, Gary David Findley, Angela McElory, Billy McPherson, Jr., Bart McPherson, Bret 

McPherson, Felicia Dianne Findley Debter, and Lucretia Suzanne Phillips.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

J.D.S., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 6 WM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
**Exhibit 34.1**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

**UPFC Auto Receivables Trust 2006-B**

The Board of Directors 

United Auto Credit Corporation:

We have examined United Auto Credit Corporation’s (the “Company”) compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for Asset Backed Notes, except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) which the Company has determined are not applicable to theactivities performed by the Company with respect to the asset-backed securities transaction being serviced for the UPFC Auto Receivables Trust 2006-B, as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from December 14, 2006 to December 31, 2006.Management is responsible for the United Auto Credit Corporation’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on United Auto Credit Corporation’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In ouropinion, the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria, as described above, as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from December 14, 2006 to December 31, 2006, in all material respects. 

/s/ Grobstein, Horwath & Company LLP 

Costa Mesa, CA 

February 28, 2007