alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILLIAM REYNOLDS, Respondent, *v.*JOHN GILCHREST, Impleaded with JAMES H. TRUESDALL, Appellant.

*Supplementary proceedings—failure of defendant to appeal’—contempt—amount of*fine— *what proper.*

MotioN for a reargument on an appeal from an order of the county judge of Westchester county, adjudging John Gilchrest guilty of contempt for not obeying an order made in supplementary proceedings, and imposing a fine of the amount due on the judgment in the order and the costs and expenses of proceeding, and directing that he stand committed 'till the same should be paid.

The court at General Term say: *“*This motion is made under a misapprehension of the decision made by this court. The appeal was from an order imposing a fine for a contempt. This fine was the entire amount of the judgment. There was no proof authorizing the county judge to impose so large a fine. The proceedings were supplementary to an execution. The judgment debtor made an unexcused default. The order should have been that such moderate fine be imposed as would pay the prosecuting attorney for his costs and expenses, and that the debtor should appear before the county judge for examination. No loss was shown by reason *204of the default. If we could have found from the papers the fitting costs and expenses we would have modified the order accordingly, but in the absence of such proof we reversed the order so that new proceedings might be taken if the owner of the judgment saw fit to institute them.”

*Wm. F. Furdy,*for the appellant. *J. 8. Millard,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

BarNArd, P. J.;

Pratt, J., concurred.

Present — BarNArd, P. J., Pratt and DyeMAN, JJ.

Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,875,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,875,000
<PP&E>                                     143,850,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,029,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             127,078,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       92,755,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,261,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               127,078,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,384,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,181,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               152,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,244,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                900,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            900,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (184,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   716,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2146 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:13:20 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2146 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:13:20 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2146 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:13:20 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2146 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:13:20 Page 4 of

4
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2470 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2470

           To suspend for 3 years the duty on fenbuconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2000

  Mr. Specter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend for 3 years the duty on fenbuconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON FENBUCONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.86      alpha-[2-(4-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/
                         Chlorophenyl)-                                                     31/2002          ''.
                         ethyl]-alpha-
                         phenyl-1H-1,2,4-
                         triazole-1-
                         propanenitrile
                         (CAS No. 114369-
                         43-6) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2933.90.06)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

I, Daniel L. Hefner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of American Fiber Green Products, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers
and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                                      |  |                                                    |  |               
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|/s/ Daniel L. Hefner Daniel L.
Hefner |  | President & Director (Principal Executive Officer) |  | April 16, 2007
|                                             |   | Jurisdiction      of  |   | %      of Voting        |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                             |   | Incorporation      or |   | Securities      held at |
| Name      of Corporation                         |   | Organization          |   | December      31, 2009  |
|                                             |   |                  |   |                    |
| Consolidated      subsidiaries:                  |   |                  |   |                    |
| Ti-Pro, LLC                                      |   | Nevada                |   |  100%              |
| TMCA International,      Inc.                    |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Bermuda      Limited                       |   | Bermuda               |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK Holding Company      Limited            |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| Loterios SpA                                     |   | Italy                 |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK Limited                                 |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| Titanium MC    Limited                           |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK (Export)      Limited                   |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Europe    Limited                          |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Savoie, SA                                 |   | France                |   |  70%               |
| TIMET Germany,    GmbH                           |   | Germany               |   |  100%              |
| Titanium Hearth Technologies,      Inc.          |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Finance Management      Company            |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK Finance Management      Company Limited |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET UK Finance Company      Limited            |   | United Kingdom        |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Real Estate      Corporation               |   | Colorado              |   |  100%              |
| TIMET Asia, Inc.                                 |   | Delaware              |   |  100%              |
|                                             |   |                  |   |                    |

----
# EXHIBIT 23

# INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS' CONSENT--DELOITTE & TOUCHE

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'
CONSENT
Board of Directors
Global Med Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No.
333-28155, No. 333-39193, No. 333-45031, No. 333-69851, No. 333-60672, and No.
333-60674) on Form S-8 of Global Med Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary, of our
report dated April 12, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Global Med Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31,
2001. 
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 28, 2002
#### In the Matter of Engrey F. Norman v. The Board of Education.

Motion granted. Order to be settled on notice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,055]

      ( print page 28297)    
                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 28, 2009, applicable to workers of Ovonic Energy Products, Springboro, Ohio. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57340).                

At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of batteries and related energy storage systems.

New information shows that workers leased from PDSI were employed on-site at the Springboro, Ohio location of Ovonic Energy Products. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from PDSI working on-site at the Springboro, Ohio location of Ovonic Energy Products.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,055 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Ovonic Energy Products, including on-site leased workers from PDSI, Springboro, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 18, 2008, through August 28, 2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of May 2010.

Elliott S. Kushner

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-12111 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 475 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 475

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2013

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include vaccines against 
     seasonal influenza within the definition of taxable vaccines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF VACCINES AGAINST SEASONAL INFLUENZA TO LIST OF 
              TAXABLE VACCINES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (N) of section 4132(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``or any other 
vaccine against seasonal influenza'' before the period.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) Sales, etc.--The amendment made by this section shall 
        apply to sales and uses on or after the later of--
                    (A) the first day of the first month which begins 
                more than 4 weeks after the date of the enactment of 
                this Act, or
                    (B) the date on which the Secretary of Health and 
                Human Services lists any vaccine against seasonal 
                influenza (other than any vaccine against seasonal 
                influenza listed by the Secretary prior to the date of 
                the enactment of this Act) for purposes of compensation 
                for any vaccine-related injury or death through the 
                Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund.
            (2) Deliveries.--For purposes of paragraph (1) and section 
        4131 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of sales 
        on or before the effective date described in such paragraph for 
        which delivery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 
        be considered the sale date.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 18, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


Titan
Machinery Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan


 


Each non-employee
director of Titan Machinery Inc. (the “Company”) shall receive:


 


·                  an annual retainer of $20,000, payable
quarterly (the chair of the audit committee shall receive an additional $10,000
retainer);


·                  an annual grant of shares of restricted
common stock(1) equal to $30,000, based upon the fair market value of the
Company’s common stock on the grant date(2), granted on the first trading day
of the second month of the Company’s second fiscal quarter;


·                  a $1,500 cash fee per board meeting
attended and a $1,000 cash fee per committee meeting attended ($500 for board
or committee teleconferences); and


·                  reimbursement of reasonable expenses
incurred in connection with his services as a director.


 






(1) The restricted stock grants shall have a
one-year vesting period and each director shall be required to hold such shares
of restricted stock until such director is no longer serving as a director of
Titan Machinery Inc.


(2) The fair market value of the Company’s common
stock shall be equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the
Nasdaq stock market on the date of determination.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-4554 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. No. 97-4555 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALLEYNE REED WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. No. 97-4556 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,2 versus JAMES EDWARD GREENHOW, a/k/a James Neal, a/k/a Candyman, Defendant - Appellant. No. 97-4557 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEVI HAWKINS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 97-4561 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant.3 No. 97-4562 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALLEYNE REED WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. No. 97-4563 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES EDWARD GREENHOW, a/k/a James Neal, a/k/a Candyman, Defendant - Appellant. No. 97-4564 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,4 versus ORRIE GAINES HOLMES, a/k/a Chopper, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-4565 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEVI HAWKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-95-44, CR-95-39) Submitted: June 2, 1998 Decided: July 24, 1998 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Noland Grinnalds, Hampton, Virginia; Richard Chisolm Kerns, Newport News, Virginia; Wesley Lee Pendergrass, Hampton, Virginia; Richard S. Yarrow, Hampton, Virginia; Robert Bruce Jones, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellants. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.5 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants were convicted of various charges stemming from their respective roles in a conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and marijuana. See 21 U.S.C. § 2 (1994); 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1994). In addition, several Appellants were convicted of firearms charges related to the drug conspiracy. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West Supp. 1998); 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1) (West Supp. 1998). For his role as the leader of the conspiracy, Marty Lorenzo Wright also was convicted of conducting a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE). See 21 U.S.C. § 848(a) & (c) (1994). Finding no merit to any of Appellants’ assignments of error, we affirm their convictions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Forster Drilling
        Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that
        the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007
        (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
        15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ F.
        E.
        FORSTER, III
 F.E.
        Forster III
 Chief
        Executive Officer
  Date:
        July 23, 2007
# Vetoes, 1789 to Present 

**

----

Summary of Bills Vetoed

Additional information about veto power and procedure can be found in the CRS reports, *Veto Override Procedure in the House and Senate* (PDF) and *Regular Vetoes and Pocket Vetoes: An Overview* (PDF)

1. Attempted intra-session pocket vetoes on H.R.1 (101st Congress) and S.333 (101st Congress) were disputed.  Both bills were enacted into law so are not counted on this table.

2. H.R.4042 (98th Congress) is counted as a pocket veto.

3. A pocket veto on H.R.4476 (44th Congress) is not counted on this table because, "...It was not placed before the President for signature." (H.Doc. 493, 70th Congress, p.24)

4. The total number of vetoes tabulated is 2,594. This figure is 1 less than the numbered presidential vetoes because of the Grant disputed pocket veto (see footnote 3).

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure