alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1949 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 15:30:35 Page 1 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1949 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 15:30:35 Page 2 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1949 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 15:30:35 Page 3 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1949 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 15:30:35 Page 4 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1949 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 15:30:35 Page 5 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1949 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 15:30:35 Page 6 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1949 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 15:30:35 Page 7 of

8
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1949 Filed: 05/09/19 Entered: 05/09/19 15:30:35 Page 8 of

8
EXHIBIT 32(a)

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                             OF 99 CENTS ONLY STORES

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the
period ended December 31, 2003 of 99 Cents Only Stores (the "Issuer").

I, David Gold, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that to the best of
my knowledge:

     (i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.


Dated: March 12, 2004


                              /s/  David Gold
                              -----------------
                              Name:  David Gold
                              Title:  Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 1, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00653

- CR

David TAFOLLA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR84 87 Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Pursuant to a plea

- bargain agreement, appellant pleaded nolo contendere to two counts of robbery , and the trial court assessed a punishment of two eighteen

- year terms of imprisonment to be served concurrently . On August 13

, 2018, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant filed a notice of appeal, the trial court

c lerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The full clerk’s record, including the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d).

“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the pu nishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the tria l court gave its permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea

- bargain case and that appellant does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification t hat shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).This appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d),

unless an amended trial court certification showing that appellant has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by October 31, 2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v.

State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order).

We ORDER all appellate deadli nes be suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereu nto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
#### H. A. Scott, trustee, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Thomas Berry, defendant in error.

I. The holder of a rent note, who is not the landlord, cannot sue out a distress warrant for rent not due. But when, in such a case, the affidavit made for the distress warant, describes the sum sued for as the rent for a plantation owned by a third person, and the rent note is pay. able to such third person or bearer, it does not necessarily follow that the affiant is not the landlord. If such was the fact, it should be proved upon an issue raised by counter-affidavit before the jury, and the Court ashed to charge the law applicable to the case.

*395Distress warrant. Landlord and tenant. Before Judge Harrell. Clay Superior Court. March Term, 1872.

Thomas Berry made affidavit for a distress warrant as follows: “That H. A. Scott, trustee for his wife and children, of said county, is justly indebted to him, deponent, in the sum of $1,50,0 for the rent of the plantation of J. E. Trentlen, for the year 1871, and which sum is to mature and become due on December 1st, next, and that the said H. A. Scott, trustee for his wife and children, is seeking to remove his crop from the premises.”

This affidavit was based upon a note dated November 29th, 1870, due December 1st, 1871, for $1,500, payable to J. E. Trentlen or bearer, for rent of plantation for the year 1871, of which Berry was the holder. Scott made the usual counter-affidavit, and upon the trial, moved to dismiss the distress warrant upon the ground that plaintiff, as appeared of record, was not the landlord of defendant, but was the holder of the note given to the landlord, and was, therefore, not entitled to the process of distress warrant.

The motion was overruled and plaintiff in error excepted.

B. Ekeman ; H. Fielder, for plaintiff in error.

John C. Wells; John T. Clark, for defendant.

Montgomery, Judge.

> It is true that no one but a landlord may distrain for rent: 3 Blackstone’s Commentaries, 6, n.; therefore, the holder, as such, of a rent note cannot; but it is not true that only the owner of the fee can be a landlord. A lease is an estate and may be assigned: *Garner vs. Byard,*23 *Georgia Reports,*291. Hence, a tenant may sub-let; and, as to the sub-tenant, he is the landlord — that he takes a rent note, payable to the owner of the fee or bearer, is not inconsistent with the idea of a sub-lease. For aught that appears by this record, Berry was the original lessee of the Trentlen plantation, and he in *396turn sub-let to Scott. If such were not the fact, the issue should have been raised by the counter-affidavit and the proof submitted to a jury, or perhaps the proof might have been made upon the usual counter-affidavit. The motion to dismiss assumes that it appears by the record that Berry is not Scott’s landlord. It only appears that he is not owner of the land rented.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,508
<INVENTORY>                                    543,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               730,405
<PP&E>                                       1,212,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,102,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          346,196
<BONDS>                                        713,591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           637
<OTHER-SE>                                     879,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,102,395
<SALES>                                      2,192,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,192,747
<CGS>                                        1,533,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,039,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,545
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (251,237)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            345,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,978)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   343,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.42 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.99 <F2>
        
<FN>
<F1> Represents basic earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
earnings per share. 
<F2> Represents diluted earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, 
earnings per share.
</FN>

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28672-28673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7019]


U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Notice of Teleconference 
Meeting

    The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a conference call 
on

[[Page 28673]]

Friday, June 11, 2010, beginning at 3 p.m. Eastern Time. The 
teleconference meeting will be closed to the public to allow the 
Commission to discuss applications for the 2010 UNESCO International 
Literacy Prizes. This call will be closed pursuant to Section 10(d) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) because it 
will involve discussions of information of a personal nature regarding 
the relative merits of individual applicants where disclosure would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.
    For more information contact Elizabeth Kanick, Executive Director 
of the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Washington, DC 20037. 
Telephone: (202) 663-0026; fax: (202) 663-0035; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e3a3d2b303b2d3d313e0d0a1f0a1b50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="581c1b0d161d0b1b17182b2c392c3d763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 13, 2010.
Elizabeth Kanick,
Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-12319 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2288 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 15:18:36 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2288 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 15:18:36 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2288 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 15:18:36 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2288 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 15:18:36 Page 4 of

4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                             164600
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       78100
<ALLOWANCES>                                          400
<INVENTORY>                                        281900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   584100
<PP&E>                                             256200
<DEPRECIATION>                                      59200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     832100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              324700
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              300
<OTHER-SE>                                         383600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       832100
<SALES>                                           1672300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1672300
<CGS>                                             1144700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1144700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   380300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (14400)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    161700
<INCOME-TAX>                                        54600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 71100
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (52800)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        18300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
                                               

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 17

- 4971

_____________________________ G ARY W INTERS , Petitioner ,

v.
F LORIDA C OMMISSION ON O FFENDER R EVIEW , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Wri t of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

October 4, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.
R OWE , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and aut horized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Gary Winters, pro se , Petitioner

. Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee , for Respon dent

.
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2338    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 10:53:15    Page 1 of2

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2338    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 10:53:15    Page 2 of2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4720 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4720

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the priority for 
 enrollment of medal of honor recipients in the health care system of 
                  the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2014

 Mr. Walberg (for himself, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Weber of 
   Texas, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Connolly, and Mr. 
    Tonko) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the priority for 
 enrollment of medal of honor recipients in the health care system of 
                  the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medal of Honor Priority Care Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITY OF MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENTS IN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1705 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting the following: ``and veterans who were awarded 
        the medal of honor under section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of title 
        10 or section 491 of title 14.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``veterans who were 
        awarded the medal of honor under section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of 
        title 10 or section 491 of title 14,''.
    (b) Application.--The priority of enrollment of medal of honor 
recipients pursuant to section 1705(a)(1) of title 38, United States 
Code, as amended by subsection (a), shall apply to each such recipient, 
regardless of the date on which the medal is awarded.
                                 <all>
```
Form TRANSC

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Northern District of California

In re Debtor(s):

PG&E Corporation

Case No.: 19−30088 DM 11

Chapter: 11

NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSCRIPT

AND DEADLINES RELATED TO RESTRICTION AND REDACTION

A transcript of the proceeding held on May 22, 2019 was filed on May 23, 2019. The following deadlines apply:

The parties have until Thursday, May 30, 2019 to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this

transcript. The deadline for filing a request for redaction is Thursday, June 13, 2019.

If a request for redaction is filed, the redacted transcript is due Monday, June 24, 2019.

If no such notice is filed, the transcript may be made available for remote electronic access upon expiration of the

restriction period, which is Wednesday, August 21, 2019, unless extended by court order.

To review the transcript for redaction purposes, you may purchase a copy from the transcriber,

Jason Gottlieb

Attn: Jason Gottlieb, Dir. of Tran. Ops.

7227 N 16th St. #207

Phoenix, AZ 85020

or you may view the document at the clerk's office public terminal.

Dated: 5/28/19 For the Court:

Edward J. Emmons

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2210-1 Filed: 05/23/19 Entered: 05/23/19 15:44:46 Page 1

of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                        8,548
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,759
<ALLOWANCES>                  14
<INVENTORY>                   2,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              15,045
<PP&E>                        8,057
<DEPRECIATION>                4,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                20,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,764
<BONDS>                       1,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         1,500
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      92
<OTHER-SE>                    15,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  20,116
<SALES>                       3,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3,097
<CGS>                         1,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            23
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (700)
<INCOME-TAX>                  48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (748)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (748)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.05)
        


</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofFebruary 17, 2021, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the“Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
By: 
/s/ Randy Bockenstedt
Name: Randy BockenstedtTitle: Senior Vice President, CollectionsDate: March 29, 2024By: 
/s/ Jonathan Watson
Name: Jonathan WatsonTitle: Executive Vice President, TreasurerDate: March 29, 2024**
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) AND RULE 15D-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Auxilio, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2010, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2011, and this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (as amended, the “Report”), we, Joseph J. Flynn, Chief Executive Officer and Paul T. Anthony, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and






(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.






Date: March 22, 2011




By:
/s/ Joseph J. FlynnJoseph Flynn  ,

President and Chief Executive Officer





By:
/s/ Paul T. AnthonyPaul Anthony,

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.