alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPENDIX A: ACTIONS OF THE

JANUARY 29, 2024, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed appointment of David M. Rubenstein 

as a member of the Advancement Committee, for a term to coincide with the duties and 

responsibilities as Ambassador for the Smithsonian Campaign, and requests that the Chancellor 

make the necessary appointments. [2024.01.01]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed committee chairmanship and

member assignments for 2024 and requests that the Chancellor make the necessary 

appointments. [2024.01.02]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the Compensation and Human Resources 

Committee’s 2024 compensation recommendation for the Secretary. [2024.01.03]

VOTED that the Board of Regents changes the title of the Chief of Staff to the Board of Regents 

to Counselor and Chief of Staff to the Board of Regents. [2024.01.04]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the Compensation and Human Resources 

Committee’s 2024 compensation recommendations for senior executive positions. [2024.01.05]

VOTED that the Board of Regents adopts the Consent Agenda, which constitutes the approval 

of all action items listed therein. [2024.01.06]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the minutes of the October 23, 2023,

meeting of the Board of Regents.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed slate of candidates for

appointment or reappointment to 13 Smithsonian Institution Advisory Boards.

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed amendments to the bylaws of

the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Advisory Council.

VOTED that the Board of Regents authorizes the Secretary to submit to Congress a federal 

budget request for appropriated funds for fiscal year 2025 as part of the President’s budget in 

the amount of $1,160.2 million, as negotiated with the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB), and authorizes the Secretary to inform OMB and Congress fully about the implications 

of the President’s budget for the mission and priorities of the Smithsonian. [2024.01.07]
#### Joseph Kavada, Respondent, v. Henry A. Morgan, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## Paths to Justice Summit Series

This month, the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System (IAALS), is launching a virtual summit series, *Paths to Justice***.**The series is comprised of multiple invite-only virtual convenings, as well as a series of webinars focusing on the paths of the pandemic, the paths to access, and the paths to racial justice that our system must walk in this new normal.The past year has emphasized that our system often falls short of the promise of equal justice, and there is much work to be done to realize justice for all. It is clear that now, more than ever, we need transformative change on a broad scale.

Registration is now open and free. To register click here.

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
#### Clara Goldberg, as Administratrix, etc., of Abraham Goldberg, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Paul Beinlich, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant tó abidé the event, upon the ground that the evidence failed to show that plaintiff: was free from contributory negligence.

Present — Ingraham, P, J.,. McLaughlin, Laughlin, Miller and Dowling, JJ.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that the plaintiff failed to show freedom from contributory negligence. •
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
registration  statement on Form S-8,  dated June 12, 1996,  and Form S-3,  dated
February 12, 1999, of CardioTech International, Inc. of our report dated May 25,
1999, except as to the information  presented in the fourth paragraph of Note I,
for which the date is June 25, 1999,  which included an emphasis of matter going
concern  paragraph,  on our audit of the  consolidated  financial  statements of
CardioTech  International,  Inc. as of March 31,  1999,  and for each of the two
years in the period  ended  March 31,  1999,  which  report is  included  in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
June 29, 1999
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. ALBERT DAY, Appellant, *v.*JOHN H. BERGEN, Referee, Respondent.

*Oosts*— *Special proceeding*— Commitment *of refwee for contempt for refusing to ca/rry out judgment of foredoswre*— *is not.*

Appeal from an order of the Special Term, affirming a taxation of costs by the clerk of Kings county.

This proceeding was instituted to secure the commitment of the defendant for a contempt, in refusing to pay and discharge certain taxes and assessments upon real estate sold by him as a referee, as required by the judgment in the action of *Easton*v. *Piclcersgill.*

The court at General Term set aside the warrant of commitment. (13 S. O. R. N. Y. [6 Hun], 267.)

The relator objected to the taxation of the costs by the clerk, on the ground that this was a special proceeding, and that the costs should be taxed by the judge before whom the same was heard, or by the court by which it was decided.

The court at General Term say : *“*It seems to me clear that the motion, out of which this controversy has arisen, was a part of the machinery belonging to the action of *Easton*v. *Piclcersgill,*used to carry the decree into effectual execution and protect the rights of the parties therein.

It was, therefore, not a special proceeding within the meaning of *203section 3 of the Code, and the clerk was the proper officer to tax the costs under the decision of the General Term. (See Code, §§ 178, 471; *Dresser r. Van Pelt,*6 Duer,. 687; *Seeley*v. *Black,,*35 How., 369; *Pitt*v. Davison, 37 N. Y., 235; *Holstem*v. *Bice,*15 Abb., 307.)

It follows that the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.”

*Albert Day,*appellant, in person.

*John H. Bergen,*respondent, in person.

Opinion by

Pbatt, J.

Present — BaeNAed. P. J., Peatt and Dyxman, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 99.1



                              99 Cents Only Stores
                            4000 Union Pacific Avenue
                           City of Commerce, CA. 90023


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


March 28, 2002


Ladies and Gentlemen:

        This will confirm that 99 Cents Only Stores (the "Company") has received
a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen") with respect to Arthur
Andersen's audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2001. Arthur Andersen's letter certifies that the audit was
subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate
continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of
national office consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Andrew Farina
Chief Financial Officer
#### M. M. Tidwell, plaintiff in error, *vs.*John T. Hewell *et*al., defendants in error.

A judgment based upon a noté for the hire of a negro, being the oldest, is entitled to a fund in Court for distribution. (R.)

Constitutional law. Negro hire. Money rule. Before Judge Wright. Fayette Superior Court. October Adjourned Term, 1871.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

Tidwell & Fears, for plaintiff in error.

*223J. L. Blalock ; R. S. Dorsey, for defendants.

Warner, Chief Justice.

This case came before the Court below on a motion to distribute money in the hands of the Clerk. The law and the facts, by agreement of the parties, was submitted to the presiding Judge for his decision, and, after hearing the evidence, decided that Tidwell’s judgment, (which was admitted to be the oldest,) was not entitled to be paid, because the note on which it was founded had been given for negro hire. This decision of the Court was error.

Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (10-055)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

# SUMMARY:

Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

# DATES:

May 21, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert M. Padilla, Patent Counsel, Ames Research Center, Code 202A-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000; telephone (650) 604-5104; fax (650) 604-2767.

*NASA Case No. ARC-14653-1:*                         Air Traffic Management Evaluation Tool (FACET).                    

*NASA Case No. ARC-16320-1:*                         Model-Based Prognostics for Batteries.                    

*NASA Case No. ARC-16342-1:*                         Advanced Sensor Technology for Algai Biotechnology (ASTAB).                    

*NASA Case No. ARC-16370-1:*                         A Truss Beam Having Convex-Curved Rods, Shear Web Panels, and Self-Aligning Adapters.                    

*NASA Case No. ARC-16407-1:*                         Content Analysis to Detect High Stress in Oral Interviews and Text Documents.                    

Dated: May 17, 2010.

Richard W. Sherman,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-12163 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Notice of Transfer - CoachSource, LLC

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1778 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 13:52:32 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1778 Filed: 05/01/19 Entered: 05/01/19 13:52:32 Page 2 of

2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40691 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PEDRO RAMOS-LUCIO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-103-ALL

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Pedro Ramos-Lucio appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry. He was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment and one year of supervised release. He argues that, in light of United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), his sentence is invalid because the district court applied the Sentencing Guidelines as if they were mandatory. We review for plain error. United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 513, 520-22 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No.No. 04-40691 -2- 04-9517); United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). Ramos-Lucio is unable to establish plain error with regard to his Booker claim because he cannot establish that being sentenced under a mandatory Guidelines scheme affected his substantial rights. The record does not indicate that the district court “would have reached a significantly different result” under a sentencing scheme in which the Guidelines were advisory only. See Mares , 402 F.3d at 520-22; Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d at 733-34. Ramos-Lucio also asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) are unconstitutional. He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed, but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). This issue is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 247 (1998); United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7019]

                    The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a conference call on                           ( print page 28673)                        Friday, June 11, 2010, beginning at 3 p.m. Eastern Time. The teleconference meeting will be closed to the public to allow the Commission to discuss applications for the 2010 UNESCO International Literacy Prizes. This call will be closed pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) because it will involve discussions of information of a personal nature regarding the relative merits of individual applicants where disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.                

                    For more information contact Elizabeth Kanick, Executive Director of the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Washington, DC 20037. Telephone: (202) 663-0026; fax: (202) 663-0035; e-mail:                     *DCUNESCO@state.gov.*

Dated: May 13, 2010.

Elizabeth Kanick,

Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-12319 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
<PAGE>

   
          Exhibit 11.01 - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share
    

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Fiscal                 Fiscal                Fiscal
                                                             1996                   1995                  1994
                                                       ------------------     ------------------     ------------------
                                                                       (In Thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                                     <C>                     <C>                    <C>             
Average shares outstanding .........................               57,722                 44,955                 45,010
Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on
   the treasury stock method using average
   market price ....................................                1,118                      -                     -

Total ..............................................               58,840                 44,955                45,010
                                                       ==================     ==================     ================== 
Income (loss) before extraordinary charge ..........    $          36,890       $        (58,104)      $       (10,083)
                                                       ==================     ==================     ================== 
Net income (loss) ..................................    $          24,144       $        (64,095)      $       (10,618)
                                                       ==================     ==================     ================== 
Per  share amounts:

   Income (loss) before extraordinary charge .......    $            .63       $           (1.29)      $         (0.22)
                                                       ==================     ==================     ================== 
   Net income (loss) ...............................    $            .41       $           (1.43)      $         (0.24)
                                                       ==================     ==================     ================== 
</TABLE>

   
Note: In fiscal 1996, the conversion of the 5-1/2% Convertible Subordinated
Notes is not assumed in the computation because its effect is antidilutive.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the period  ending  December  31,  2006 (the  "Report")  I,
Harinder  Dhillon,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer,  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant  to 18USC  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


\s\Harinder Dhillon
___________________________
Harinder Dhillon

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2006 (the  "Report") I, Louie
Ucciferri,  Chairman,  Secretary,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


\s\Louie Ucciferri
__________________________
Louie Ucciferri

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ACTIONS OF THE JANUARY 18, 2018, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the full Board of Regents pursuant to bylaw 

3.01, recognizes the generosity of William Barron Hilton to the National Air and Space Museum 

and extends the naming of the Barron Hilton Pioneers of Flight gallery for an additional 13 

years, through 2045.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the full Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, recognizes the generosity of members of the National Air and Space Museum Board 

to the National Air and Space Museum and names the Gen. J. R. “Jack” Dailey Director’s 

Conference Room, for a period of 20 years or until the next renovation, whichever occurs later.