alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited  financial  statements of Liberty Housing Partners Limited Partnership
at and for the period  ended March 31, 1998 and is  qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         258,194
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,194
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,341,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          491,151
<BONDS>                                        12,167,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,317,372)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,341,417
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,475
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               30,742
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             623,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (538,710)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (24.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2611

To provide trade adjustment assistance for certain workers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 23, 2000

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide trade adjustment assistance for certain workers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE.

4 (a) CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR WORKERS

5 REQUIRED FOR CLOSURE OF FACILITY.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

7 provision of law or any decision by the Secretary of

8 Labor denying certification or eligibility for certifi9 cation for adjustment assistance under title II of the

10 Trade Act of 1974, a qualified worker described in

11 paragraph (2) shall be certified by the Secretary as
2

•S 2611 IS

1 eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under

2 such title II.

3 (2) QUALIFIED WORKER.—For purposes of this

4 subsection, a ‘‘qualified worker’’ means a worker

5 who—

6 (A) was determined to be covered under

7 Trade Adjustment Assistance Certification TA–

8 W–31,402; and

9 (B) was necessary for the environmental

10 remediation or closure of a copper mining facil11 ity.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of

14 this Act.

Æ
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6790** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. QUENETTA BARNES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 00191

- JRS

- 1 )

Submitted : July 24, 2012 Decided: August 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Quenetta Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica Aber Brumberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Laura Colombell Marshall, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; G. Michael Favale, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virgin ia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Quenetta Barnes appeals the district court’s order denying her request to credit her with intermittent time served during her term of supervis ed release and a pply that credit to her current term of imprisonment following the revocation of her supervis ed release
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barn es , No. 3:06

- cr 00191

- JRS

- 1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# Hispanic American Senators

**

----

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Hispanic Heritage Month 

Celebrating Hispanic Heritage Month

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 090225243-0170-03]
RIN 0648-AX67
 AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
 ACTION: Final rule; correction.
 SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule to implement Amendment 31 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico that was published in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         Monday, April 26, 2010.
 DATES: This correction is effective May 26, 2010.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Sandorf, 727-824-5305; fax: 727-824-5308; e-mail: 
                        *scott.sandorf@noaa.gov*.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Need for Correction On April 26, 2010, (75 FR 21520, April 26, 2010) an incorrect coordinate for Point G, in § 622.34 (q) was published and this document corrects that coordinate. 1. On page 21520, in the third column, under § 622.34 (q), the Point G coordinate is corrected to read as follows: § 622.34
  (q) * * * Point
North lat.
West long.*        *         *         *         *G
26°48.80′
83°40.00′*        *         *         *         *
 Dated: May 18, 2010 Eric C. Schwaab, Assistant Administrator For Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.


[FR Doc. 2010-12383 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
#### Ignatz Reder and Another, Respondents, v. John T. Byrne, Appellant.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Jenks, P. J , Hirsehberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION FROM THE FORM 10-Q OF
HOWELL CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                            6194
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    60353
<ALLOWANCES>                                       217
<INVENTORY>                                       3304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 72241
<PP&E>                                          401539
<DEPRECIATION>                                  205083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  269481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            72761
<BONDS>                                          98173
<COMMON>                                          4922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        690
<OTHER-SE>                                       72458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    269481
<SALES>                                         494256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                494256
<CGS>                                           474522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   474522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5717
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2043
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
#### State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Brent D. Douglas, appellant.

468 N.W.2d 612

Filed May 3, 1991.

No. 90-223.

*12James Martin Davis for appellant.

Robert M. Spire, Attorney General, and Kenneth W. Payne for appellee.

Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.

Grant, J.

Defendant was charged by information with possession with intent to distribute, deliver, or dispense cocaine, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(1)(a) (Reissue 1989). He filed a motion to suppress “the fruits of a search” of his residence and a motion to suppress his statements given to police officers. After hearing, the trial court denied the motions.

Later, a deputy county attorney and counsel for defendant waived jury trial and agreed “to stipulate the police reports into evidence and let The Court make its determination based on that sole exhibit,” which was an identified collection of police reports. Defendant made no objection to the admissibility of any matters included in the identified exhibit of police reports.

The trial court found defendant guilty of the crime charged and later sentenced him to 6 to 20 years’ confinement, with credit for 1 day in jail prior to sentencing. Defendant appealed to this court, assigning one error, contending that the trial court erred in admitting his statements into evidence. We affirm.

As set out above, no objection was made at trial to the admission of defendant’s oral statements. We have held that in a criminal trial, after the pretrial denial of a motion to suppress a defendant’s statement, the defendant must object at trial to the receipt of the statement in order to preserve the question for review on appeal. *State*v. *Pointer,*224 Neb. 892, 402 N.W.2d 268 (1987); *State v. Cody,*236 Neb. 69, 459 N.W.2d 195 (1990). See, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-103(1)(a) (Reissue 1989); *State*v. *Robinson,*233 Neb. 729, 448 N.W.2d 386 (1989); *State*v. *Cox,*231 Neb. 495, 437 N.W.2d 134 (1989). There is no reason that that settled rule should not be applied in jury-waived trials submitted on police reports, as in this case.

*13In addition, we note the appeal approaches the frivolous. In the police reports submitted, it is shown that at least 16 items, including scales, plastic bags, and drain water, seized pursuant to a search warrant, tested positive for the presence of cocaine. That evidence was not objected to and those seizures were not assigned as error in this court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin C. Quinn, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date: August 10, 2009/s/ Kevin C. QuinnKevin C. QuinnPresident
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Patrick J. Pedonti, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SS&C Technologies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [not applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  April 2, 2007 /s/ Patrick J. Pedonti   Patrick J. Pedonti   Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

December 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30749 Summary Calendar

TERRY HOLLOWELL; JILL HOLLOWELL

Plaintiff-Appellants

versus

KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CV-10-K

--------------------

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Terry Hollowell and Jill Hollowell (hereinafter Plaintiffs)

filed suit in the district court of the Parish of St. James,

Louisiana against Terry Hollowell’s employer, Kaiser Aluminum and

Chemical Corporation (hereinafter Defendant) seeking recovery of

damages for injuries sustained by Terry Hollowell on December 27,

2002 when he fell approximately forty feet from the top of a

facility he was working on during the course of his employment by

Defendant and sustained serious and permanent injuries as a result.No. 03-11266

-2-

Plaintiffs assert that these injuries were the result of

intentional acts of Defendant and therefore constitute an exception

to the provisions of the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Defendant removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana on diversity of citizenship and moved

for summary judgment on the ground s that Plaintiffs’s exclusive

remedy against Defendant was under the Louisiana Workmen’s

Compensation Act. The district court granted the motion for summary

judgment and Plaintiffs appeal.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and the record excerpts

and for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed

under date of June 30, 2004, we affirm the judgment entered by the

district court under date of June 30, 2004, dismissing with

prejudice Plaintiffs’ claims. AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2676 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2676

  To amend the National Labor Relations Act to provide for inflation 
 adjustments to the mandatory jurisdiction thresholds of the National 
                         Labor Relations Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2000

   Mr. Hutchinson (for himself, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Hagel, Mr. 
Sessions, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Helms, Mr. Allard, 
 Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Labor Relations Act to provide for inflation 
 adjustments to the mandatory jurisdiction thresholds of the National 
                         Labor Relations Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS TO MANDATORY JURISDICTION THRESHOLDS 
              OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

    Section 14(c)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 
164(c)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c)(1)(A) Mandatory Jurisdiction.--The Board shall assert 
jurisdiction over any labor dispute involving any class or category of 
employers over which it would assert jurisdiction under the standards 
prevailing on August 1, 1959, with the financial threshold amounts 
adjusted for inflation under subparagraph (B).
    ``(B) Inflation Adjustments.--The Board, beginning on October 1, 
2000, and not less often than every 5 years thereafter, shall adjust 
each of the financial threshold amounts referred to in subparagraph (A) 
for inflation, using as the base period the later of (i) the most 
recent calendar quarter ending before the financial threshold amount 
was established, or (ii) the calendar quarter ending June 30, 1959. The 
inflation adjustments shall be determined using changes in the Consumer 
Price Index for all urban consumers published by the Department of 
Labor and shall be rounded to the nearest $10,000. The Board shall 
prescribe any regulations necessary for making the inflation 
adjustments.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2




I, Jonathan M. Couchman, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Footstar, Inc.; and




2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date: May 2, 2011




By: /s/ Jonathan M. CouchmanJonathan M. CouchmanChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1897 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 14:43:44 Page 1 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1897 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 14:43:44 Page 2 of

3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1897 Filed: 05/07/19 Entered: 05/07/19 14:43:44 Page 3 of

3
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 4.1

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1




Amendment No. 1, dated October 16, 1997, to the Shareholder Protection Rights
Agreement, dated as of October 6, 1995 (the "Agreement"), between Intermet
Corporation, a Georgia corporation (the "Company") and Trust Company Bank, as
Rights Agent (the "Rights Agent").  Capitalized terms used herein and not
defined have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.

                                  WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent have entered into the Agreement;

WHEREAS, Section 5.4 of the Agreement provides that the Company and the Rights
Agent may supplement or amend the Agreement in any respect without the approval
of any holders of Rights prior to the Flip-in Date;

WHEREAS, the Flip-in Date has not occurred;

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Rights Agreement as follows, and the
Rights Agent is required to duly execute and deliver any amendment requested by
the Company which satisfies the terms of Section 5.4 of the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the parties hereby agree as
follows:

1.   The definition of Acquiring Person set forth in Section 1.1 of the
     Agreement is amended to delete "or" before (iii) and to add to the end of
     the first sentence of such definition the following:

"or (iv) who is the Beneficial Owner of 10% or more but less than 15% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock and who is one of the types of institutional
investors enumerated under Rule 13d-1(b)(I)(ii) promulgated pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as in effect on the date hereof
and who is, and remains, entitled to file a Schedule 13G under Rule 13d-1(b),
as such rule may be amended from time to time."



<PAGE>   2

AMENDMENT NO. 1 contd.                                                Page 2





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be
duly executed as of the date first above written.

INTERMET CORPORATION



By:  /s/ John Doddridge
     ------------------
     John Doddridge
     Chairman & CEO



TRUST COMPANY BANK


By: /s/ A. C. Conn
    ------------------
    A. C. Conn
    Group Vice President