alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,340
<SECURITIES>                                     3,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,884
<PP&E>                                           6,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,530
<SALES>                                         40,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,301
<CGS>                                           15,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (948)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (66,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (66,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           (4)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (66,910)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (6.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (6.97)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certifications

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Netsmart  Technologies,
Inc., for the period ended December 31, 2002, I James L. Conway, Chief Executive
Officer of Netsmart  Technologies,  Inc., hereby certify  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. this Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2. the information contained in this Form 10-K/A for the period ended December
31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.

Date:  August 21, 2003

By:  /s/ James L. Conway
-------------------------
James L. Conway
Chief Executive Officer

In connection  with this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Netsmart  Technologies,
Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2002, I, Anthony F. Grisanti,  Chief
Financial  Officer of Netsmart  Technologies, Inc.,  hereby  certify  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. this Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2. the information contained in this Form 10-K/A for the period ended December
31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.

Date:  August 21, 2003


By:  /s/Anthony F. Grisanti
----------------------------
Anthony F. Grisanti
Chief Financial Officer

These certifications are being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic
report described herein nor shall it be deemed filed by Netsmart Technologies,
Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Netsmart Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Netsmart
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### The Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, *vs.*John W. Duer, Ordinary of Muscogee County, defendant in error.

In a suit against the Ordinary of a county for taxes alleged to have been illegally collected from the plaintiff, the declaration must set forth the facts showing such illegality. (R.)

Demurrer. Pleading. Taxes. Before Judge Johnson, Muscogee Superior Court. May Term, 1872.

Plaintiff in error brought assumpsit against defendant in error. The only material portion of the declaration is as follows:

“For that the said county of Muscogee, on January 1st, 1870, and on divers other days and times before that day, bad and received illegally, by way of taxes, to and for the use of your petitioner, the sum of $1,500, (a copy of which is hereto attached,) and afterwards, to-wit:'on the day and year aforesaid, the said county of Muscogee, by said defendant, then and there undertook and faithfully promised your petitioner to pay to petitioner the said sum of money, when said defendant should be thereunto afterwards requested.”

“copy account.

“ *County of Musoogee*

To *Montgomery and West Point Railroad Company, Dr.*

To amount of taxes illegally collected in 1866.......¡$ 58 32

“ “ “ “ “ 1867....... 175 50

“ “ “ “ “ 1868....... *487*75

“ “ “ “ “ 1869....... 312 00

$1,033 57”

Defendant in error demurred to the said declaration. The demurrer was sustained by the Court, and plaintiff in error excepted and assigns said ruling as error. •

Blandford *&*Thornton, for plaintiff in error.

Henry L. Benning, for defendant in error.

*273Warner, Chief Justice.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the sum of $1,033.57 for taxes *illegally*collected. The defendant demurred to the plaintiff’s declaration, which demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff excepted. It is not alleged in the declaration in what manner the taxes received were illegally collected. That the taxes were *illegally*collected and received by the defendant, is the conclusion of the pleader. The facts going to show that the taxes had been illegally collected and received by the defendant, should have been alleged, so that the Court might judge whether, under the law applicable thereto, the taxes had been illegally collected and received. If the facts had been alleged, the Court could have determined whether the collection of taxes was legal or illegal. It is not sufficient for the plaintiff to allege that the collection of taxes was illegal, without alleging the facts which made it illegal.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Order entered September 23 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01086 - CV KEVIN BODE , ET AL. , Appellant s V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOCIATION , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Collin Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006 - 00825 - 2014 

### O RDER We GRANT the September 11, 2014 motion of Jennifer Corley, Official Court Reporter for the County Court at Law No. 6 of Collin County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. T he reporter’s record shall be filed on or before MONDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2014

. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
ACTIONS OF THE MAY 31, 2017, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the full Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed lease agreement for administrative office space in support 

of the National Air and Space Museum (“NASM”) revitalization project.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOEL BECK,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, DBA Mr. Cooper; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee Securitized Trust Structured;

FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 23

- 15203

D.C. No. 3:22

- cv

- 00225

- MMD

- CLB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22 , 2024 * *

Before: CALLAHAN

, LEE , and FORREST , Circuit Judges.

Joel Beck appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

action alleging a due process clai m arising from state court proceedings . We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 30 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 23

- 15203

jurisdiction under 28 U .S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine

. Noel v. Hall , 341

F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Beck’s action as barred by the Rooker

Feldman doctrine because it amounted to a forbidden “ de facto appeal ” of a prior

state court judgment and raise d a constitutional claim that was “inextricably

intertwined” with t hat judgment

. See i d. at 1163

- 65 (discussing proper application

of the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine) ; see also Benavidez v. County of San Diego , 993

F.3d 1134, 1142 (9th Cir. 2021) (explaining that the Rooker

- Feldman doctrine

applies even where the challenge to the state court decision involves federal

constitutional issues) ; Reusser v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. , 525 F.3d 855, 860 (9th Cir.

2008) ( Rooker

- Feldman doctrine bars a claim of extrinsic fraud if the alleged fraud

has been separately litigated in a state action ).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Edward F. Lange, Jr.
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of BRE Properties, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BRE Properties, Inc.



|                         |  |                                                                                     
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Edward F. Lange, Jr.                                                            
|                         |  | Edward F. Lange, Jr. Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

767 Fifth Avenue 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: 212 310 8000 

Fax: 212 310 8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: 415 496 6723 

Fax: 650 636 9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re: 

PG&E CORPORATION,

 - and - 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) (Jointly Administered) 

ORDER PURSUANT TO L.B.R. 9013-1(c) 

AUTHORIZING OVERSIZE BRIEFING FOR 

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND 

AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THE 

DEBTORS’ BAR DATE MOTION 

[No Hearing Requested] 

Debtors.

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric 

Company 

 Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead 

Case, No. 19-30088 (DM). 

Signed and Filed: May 3, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

May 03, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1830 Filed: 05/03/19 Entered: 05/03/19 11:40:38 Page 1 of

2
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court, having reviewed the Ex Parte Application for Order Authorizing Oversize 

Briefing Pursuant to L.B.R. 9013-1(c) for Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the 

Debtors’ Bar Date Motion (the “Application”), filed on May 2, 2019, and the Goren Declaration 

(as defined in the Application), filed contemporaneously therewith; and after due deliberation and 

sufficient cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Application is granted, as provided herein. 

2. The Debtors are authorized to file and serve a memorandum of points and 

authorities in support of the Motion of Debtors Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 502(b)(9) and 105(a), Fed. 

R. Bankr. P. 2002, 3003(c)(3), 5005, and 9007, and L.B.R. 3003-1 For Order (I) Establishing 

Deadline for Filing Proofs of Claim, (II) Establishing the Form and Manner of Notice Thereof, and 

(III) Approving Procedures for Providing Notice of Bar Date and Other Information to All Creditors 

and Potential Creditors, in excess of 25 pages, but not to exceed 40 pages. 

** END OF ORDER ** 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1830 Filed: 05/03/19 Entered: 05/03/19 11:40:38 Page 2 of

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7874

DAVID LESTER HERBERT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95-3281-

MJG)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lester Herbert, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Herbert v. Smith, No. CA-95-3281-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 7, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC

______________________ 

2014-1489

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2012-

00007.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

CoreLogic Solutions, LLC moves without opposition to 

voluntarily dismiss its appeal. The Deputy Director of the 

United States Patent and Trademark Office moves to 

intervene in this appeal and to modify the official caption.

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs. 

(3) The motion to intervene is granted. The revised 

official caption is reflected above.

Case: 14-1489 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 07/15/2014
2 IN RE CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 15, 2014

s30

Case: 14-1489 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 07/15/2014
Exhibit #(99)





                           Independent Auditors' Report



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
First National Bank:


We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, changes
in stockholders' equity and cash flows of First National Bank and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1994.  These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Bank's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and the cash flows
of First National Bank and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1994,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in notes 2(c) and 4 to the consolidated financial statements,
the Bank adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,
on January 1, 1994.


                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Roanoke, Virginia
February 10, 1995
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20016

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDRES TONOC-CHAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CR-198-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 18, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andres Tonoc-Chan appeals his sentence for transferring a

false identification document which appeared to be issued under

the authority of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1028(a)(2). The district court did not clearly err in

enhancing Tonoc-Chan’s base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. 

§ 2L2.1(b)(2)(C) because the evidence supports a finding that

Tonoc-Chan’s offense involved 103 sets of counterfeit documents. 

See § 1B1.3(a); United States v. Salazar, 70 F.3d 351, 352 (5th

Cir. 1995). 
No. 

-2-

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4751 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4751

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2014

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To make technical corrections to Public Law 110-229 to reflect the 
renaming of the Bainbridge Island Japanese American Exclusion Memorial, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BAINBRIDGE ISLAND JAPANESE AMERICAN EXCLUSION MEMORIAL.

    Section 313 of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 
(Public Law 110-229) is amended as follows:
            (1) In the heading of subsection (b), by striking 
        ``Japanese American Memorial'' and inserting ``Japanese 
        American Exclusion Memorial''.
            (2) In the heading of subsection (c)(5)(C), by striking 
        ``Japanese american memorial'' and inserting ``Japanese 
        american exclusion memorial''.
            (3) In subsection (c)(5)(C), by striking ``Japanese 
        American Memorial'' and inserting ``Japanese American Exclusion 
        Memorial''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 1 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 2 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 3 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 4 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 5 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 6 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 7 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 8 of9

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 2355    Filed: 06/03/19    Entered: 06/03/19 14:33:35    Page 9 of9