alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12159 and #12160]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1909-DR, dated 05/04/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Straight-line Winds, and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         04/30/2010 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/19/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/06/2010.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         02/04/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee, dated 05/04/2010 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Cannon, Giles, Marshall.                

*Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Alabama: Limestone.

Tennessee: Lincoln.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-12590 Filed 5-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2543 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2543

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
   Assistance Act to include airplane and rail accidents within the 
                meaning of the term ``major disaster''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2000

  Mr. Jeffords (for himself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
   Assistance Act to include airplane and rail accidents within the 
                meaning of the term ``major disaster''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF MAJOR DISASTER.

    Section 102(2) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(2)) is amended by striking 
``or explosion,'' and inserting ``explosion, or airplane or rail 
accident,''.
                                 <all>
```
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## New Report Identifies 277 Federal Laws That Obligate State Courts

A newly released report from National Center for State Courts, supported with funding from State Justice Institute, adds a new number of considerable interest to state courts: 277. That’s the number of provisions in the U.S. Code – the body of laws adopted by the United States Congress – that ask state courts to take specific action (or to not take actions) with respect to federal matters.

Read the full report: The-Role-of-State-Courts-in-our-Federal-System.pdf (ncsc.org).

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 197 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:13:38 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 197 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:13:38 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 197 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 15:13:38 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12463]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12168 and <greek-i>12169]


Kentucky Disaster Number KY-00032

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1912-DR), dated 
05/11/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 05/01/2010 and continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/17/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/12/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/11/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, dated 05/11/2010 is 
hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by 
the disaster:

Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Bath, 
Boyd, Carter, Franklin, Greenup, Madison, Marion, Adair, Mercer.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Kentucky: Bourbon, Clark, Estill, Henry, Larue, Lawrence, 
Montgomery, Nelson Nicholas, Owen, Shelby, Washington.
    Ohio: Lawrence.
    West Virginia: Wayne.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-12463 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2335

JONATHAN MCCANTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VISION CABLE; FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-1161-3-10-BD)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Jonathan McCants, Appellant Pro Se. Harry B. Burchstead, SCHWARTZ,

MCLEOD, DURANT & BURCHSTEAD, Sumter, South Carolina; Terri Hearn

Bailey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Gregory Michael Christopher, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's dismissal of one Defendant upon the

magistrate judge's recommendation and denying Appellant's motion

for a preliminary injunction. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337

U.S. 541 (1949). The portion of the district court's order denying

Appellant's motion to reconsider is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Thus, we dismiss this

portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is

interlocutory and not appealable.

But the denial of preliminary injunctive relief may be immediately appealed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1988). Our review of the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation discloses that this portion of the appeal is

without merit. Accordingly, finding no abuse of discretion, we

affirm this portion of the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
#### WILLIAM MUDGETT, as Executor of CHALES MILLER, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*GEORGE W. GOLER AND FRANCES T. GOLER, his wife, Appellants.

*Bond*— when *it may be contradicted by parol evidence, for the purpose of showing usury.*

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, given as collateral to a bond, regular and valid upon its face, parol evidence is admissible to show, for the purpose of establishing the defence of usury, that the mortgagor agreed to and did pay interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on a decision made at the Monroe Special Term,

*J. & Q. Van Voorhis,*for theyappellants.

*James L. Angle,*for the respondent.

Smith, J.:

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage, given by the defendant Golc'r and wife to the plaintiffs’ testator, Miller. The defence is usury. The mortgage was collateral to a bond executed by the defendant, conditioned for the payment of the sum of $5,500, in three years from date, with interest semi-annually. The consideration of the bond and mortgage was a loan of the sum of $5,500. At tne trial, the defendant gave evidence tending to show that, at the time of giving the bond and mortgage, the borrower agreed to pay interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum, and that he had paid interest at that rate, semi-annually, up to the time of the death of the mortgagee. The court did not pass upon the evidence, but ordered judgment for the plaintiffs on the ground, as we gather from the opinion, that as the alleged usurious agreement contradicted the bond and mortgage, it could not be established by parol evidence. That ruling presents the only question in the case. Whatever our opinion of the question might be, if it were an open one, we regard it as decided adversely to the views of the Special Term. *Macomber*v. *Dunham*(8 *303Wend., 550) we regard as a ease in point. *Merrills*v. *Law*(9 Cow., 65) is.an authority on the point, although reversed (6 Wend., 268) on other grounds. *Austin*v. *Fuller*(12 Barb., 360) decides the precise question. Other cases to the same effect are cited in Cow., Hill and Edward’s notes to Ph. Ev. [ed. of 1859], vol. 2, p. 673, note 494.

It is claimed by the respondents’ counsel that the decision, if erroneous, did not prejudice the appellants, as the evidence, if it had been considered, would not have been found sufficient to warrant the finding of a usurious agreement. We think the weight of the evidence should be first passed upon by the trial court, and the Special Term having declined to consider it, erroneously as we think, the judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide event.

Talcott, P. J., and HaiidiN, J., concurred.

So ordered.
J-S20004-16 

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA 

 Appellee 

v. 

CHARLES E. CARLSON, III 

 Appellant No. 106 WDA 2015 

Appeal from the PCRA Order December 22, 2014 

In the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-04-CR-0002338-1999 

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OLSON, J., and PLATT, J.* 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED APRIL 15, 2016

 On August 17, 2012, Carlson filed a petition pursuant to the Post 

Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), asserting that the mandatory life sentences 

that he was serving had been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme 

Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012). It 

is undisputed that Carlson was under age 18 at the time he committed the 

murders for which he received life sentences. See Appellee’s Brief, at 1. The 

PCRA court deferred action on Carlson’s petition pending the Supreme Court 

of Pennsylvania’s decision in Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1 

(Pa. 2013). 

____________________________________________ 

*

 Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. 
J-S20004-16 

- 2 - 

 After the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that Miller was not an 

avenue of relief on collateral review, the PCRA court denied Carlson’s 

petition. This timely appeal followed. 

 While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court of the United 

States held, in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S.Ct. 718 (2016), that 

Miller was retroactive and provided a remedy on collateral review. 

Montgomery therefore overruled Cunningham. 

 As a result, we reverse the PCRA court’s order dismissing Carlson’s 

petition, vacate the judgment of sentence, and remand for re-sentencing 

pursuant to Miller and Montgomery. 

 Order reversed. Judgment of sentence vacated. Case remanded for 

resentencing. Jurisdiction relinquished. 

Judgment Entered. 

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. 

Prothonotary 

Date: 4/15/2016
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10.8    
    


Date



Name

Address

City, State, Zip



Dear            :



        Last
year you received a long term incentive award of $        , that would be earned if designated performance metrics (described below) were achieved, and that would be payable
            % in restricted stock and            % in cash. In order to earn this award, Triumph needed to achieve [insert
performance metric or goal] of at least
            for fiscal            [and [your company] [Triumph Group] needed to report positive operating income for the fiscal
year]. 


        I
am pleased to inform you that, because Triumph achieved actual            of $            for
fiscal            , exceeding the target, [and [your
company] [Triumph Group] achieved positive operating income for the year], the award is earned and you have received a grant of            
restricted shares of Triumph common stock under Triumph Group's 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) and the right to receive $            in cash. Actual payment of the award will occur on
                    ,            , subject to your continued employment with Triumph, or
one of its affiliates up to that "vesting" date. Until that vesting date, the shares of
restricted stock and cash are subject to forfeiture back to Triumph if you do not remain so employed. 


        The
restricted shares are being issued under the Plan, and are subject to all provisions relevant to restricted Stock Awards under the Plan. Tax obligations will arise if and when the
award "vests" on the vesting date. In accordance with the authority delegated to the Compensation and Management Development Committee under Section 4(b) of the Plan, at the vesting date you
are hereby authorized to satisfy your withholding tax obligation by electing, in writing (which can be by electronic mail), to have Triumph withhold from the shares to be released from the forfeiture
restrictions under this award that number of shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld. You may also elect to pay any tax withholding liability in cash. You
will receive additional communication about this process closer to the vesting date. 


        The
shares of restricted stock are issued and outstanding, and during the restriction period you are entitled to vote the shares and to receive any dividends paid on all outstanding
shares of common stock. No stock certificates will be released to you until the forfeiture restrictions lapse following the vesting date. 


        For
further information about the restricted shares issued to you, please consult the Prospectus and the Plan. Feel free to contact            at Corporate
(            ) if you
have any questions on these documents. 


        Thank
you for your efforts and your contribution to the success of Triumph Group, Inc. 


Sincerely












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.8
<PAGE>   1
                                                               Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 NO. 333-11759) pertaining to the 1993 Amended Incentive Stock Plan,
the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the 1996 Director Option Plan of
Microcide Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 1997 with
respect to the financial statements of Microcide Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1996 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                            ERNST & YOUNG

Palo Alto, California
March 25, 1997
# Senators Representing Third or Minor Parties

**

----

 Total: 77 individuals (Three senators, John P. Hale, Anthony Kennedy, and Waitman T. Willey, each represented two third parties at different times.)

1 Smith announced his change from the Republican party on July 13, 1999. On November 1, 1999, he announced that he was changing back to Republican. He noted that, since his home town in New Hampshire had not yet changed his voter registration, he had technically never left the Republican party.

2 Jeffords announced his change on May 24, 2001, effective June 6, 2001, indicating that he would caucus with the Democratic party, thus changing control of the evenly divided Senate from the Republicans to the Democrats.

3 Lieberman was elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 1988, and reelected in 1994 and 2000. In 2006, he lost the Democratic primary and chose to run as an Independent Democrat, winning the 2006 election under that party affiliation.

4 Sinema was elected as a Democrat to the U.S. Senate in 2018, for the 116th Congress. On December 9, 2022, she announced that she was switching her affiliation to Independent.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Related Link 

Party Division

### Related Link 

About Parties and Leadership

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION
(FEBRUARY 28, 1996) TO DECEMBER 31, 1996. ACCORDINGLY, THIS SCHEDULE IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     $65,402,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              491,046,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             568,171,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    566,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (538,858)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               568,171,986
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,026,631
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,853,202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,987,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (813,826)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   274,968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (538,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (538,858)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (538.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (538.86)
        

</TABLE>