alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>          
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                                                             
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
                                                                 
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,658
<PP&E>                                          39,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,590
<BONDS>                                         20,956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,430
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,770
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.68
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2673 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2673

   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land to 
        Eureka County, Nevada, for continued use as cemeteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2000

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain land to 
        Eureka County, Nevada, for continued use as cemeteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) the historical use by settlers and travelers since the 
        late 1800's of the cemetery known as ``Maiden's Grave 
        Cemetery'' in Beowawe, Nevada, predates incorporation of the 
        land on which the cemetery is situated within the jurisdiction 
        of the Bureau of Land Management; and
            (2) it is appropriate that that use be continued through 
        local public ownership of the parcel rather than through the 
        permitting process of the Federal agency.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO EUREKA COUNTY, NEVADA.

    (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Director of the Bureau of Land Management (referred to in this section 
as the ``Secretary''), shall convey, without consideration, subject to 
valid existing rights, to Eureka County, Nevada (referred to in this 
section as the ``county''), all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to the parcel of land described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Land.--The parcel of land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the parcel of public land (including any improvements 
on the land) known as ``Maiden's Grave Cemetery'', consisting of 
approximately 10 acres and more particularly described as S1/2NE1/4SW1/
4SW1/4, N1/2SE1/4SW1/4SW1/4 of section 10, T.31N., R.49E., Mount Diablo 
Meridian.
    (c) Use of Land.--
            (1) In general.--The county shall continue the use of the 
        parcel conveyed under subsection (a) as a cemetery.
            (2) Reversion.--If the Secretary, after notice to the 
        county and an opportunity for a hearing, makes a finding that 
        the county has discontinued the use of the parcel conveyed 
        under subsection (a) as a cemetery, title to the parcel shall 
        revert to the Secretary.
    (d) Right-of-Way.--At the time of the conveyance under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall grant the county a right-of-way allowing 
access for persons desiring to visit the cemetery and other cemetery 
purposes over an appropriate access route.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLAZ910000.L12100000.XP0000LXSS150A00006100.241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Arizona Resource Advisory Council meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Arizona 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet on June 17, 2010, at the BLM 
National Training Center located at 9828 North 31st Avenue in Phoenix 
from 8 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. Agenda items include: BLM State Director's 
update on statewide issues; Presentation on the California Condor 
Reintroduction Program; State Director Updates on the BLM Arizona 
National Landscape Conservation System (NLCS), Water and Renewable 
Energy Strategies and RAC discussion and recommendations on issues BLM 
should consider as these strategies are implemented; RAC questions on 
BLM District Managers' Reports; and reports by RAC working groups. A 
public comment period will be provided at 11:30 a.m. on June 17, 2010, 
for any interested members of the public who wish to address the 
Council on BLM programs and business.
    Under the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, the RAC has 
been designated as the Recreation Resource Advisory Council (RRAC), and 
has the authority to review all BLM and Forest Service (FS) recreation 
fee proposals in Arizona. The afternoon meeting agenda on June 17, will 
include a brief review of the Recreation Enhancement Act (REA) Working 
Group Report, REA Working Group meeting schedule and future BLM/FS 
recreation fee proposals. The RRAC will not review any recreation fee 
proposals at this meeting.

DATES: Effective Date: May 14, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorothea Boothe, Bureau of Land 
Management, Arizona State Office, One North Central Avenue, Suite 800, 
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427, 602-417-9504.

James G. Kenna,
Arizona State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-12217 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50222

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OMAR EDUARDO MORENO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(EP-95-CR-359)

December 13, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Convicted on a guilty plea of carjacking and use of a firearm during a crime

of violence, Omar Eduardo Moreno appeals his sentence, contending that the

district court erred by increasing his base offense level seven levels for the
1

 18 U.S.C. § 2119.

2

 U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(A).

3

 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1).

4See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4 and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1).

2

discharge of a firearm. We agree, vacate Moreno’s sentence, and remand for

resentencing.

Background

Moreno pled guilty to carjacking1 and was sentenced to 210 months

imprisonment, based on U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1 which establishes a 20-point base offense

level for robbery. The district court’s computation was increased by seven levels

because a firearm was discharged during the course of the carjacking.2 In addition,

Moreno pled guilty to use of a firearm during a crime of violence3 and was

sentenced to 60 months imprisonment.4 Moreno contends that the district court

improperly increased his base offense level for carjacking to account for the

discharge of a firearm while simultaneously imposing the mandatory sentence for

use of a firearm during a crime of violence.

Analysis

A challenge to the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines is

reviewed de novo. Our review is limited to the inquiry whether the sentence was
5United States v. Thomas, 963 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1992).

6See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4(a) and Application Note 2 to § 2K2.4 (“Where a sentence under

[section 2K2.4] is imposed in conjunction with a sentence for an underlying offense, any

specific offense characteristic for the . . . use . . . of [a] firearm (e.g., § 2B3.1(b)(2)(A)-(F)

(Robbery)) is not to be applied in respect to the guideline for the underlying offense.”).

3

imposed in violation of law or as a result of an incorrect application of the

sentencing guidelines.5 Under the sentencing guidelines the court may not enhance

the base offense level for an underlying offense because of the use of a firearm and

simultaneously impose the mandatory consecutive sentence for use of that firearm.6

The district court sentenced Moreno to the mandatory sentence for use of a

firearm during a crime of violence. The court also increased the base offense level

for carjacking because Moreno discharged a firearm during the course of the

carjacking. This constitutes impermissible “double counting” and is an incorrect

application of the sentencing guidelines. We therefore must VACATE the sentence

imposed and REMAND for resentencing.
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## National Pretrial, Probation, and Parole Supervision Week

Join us in celebrating **#PPPS** Week!

The American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) is promoting the National Pretrial, Probation, and Parole Supervision Week (**#PPPSWeek**), held the third full calendar week of July (Sunday – Saturday).

This week, we celebrate over 100,000 community corrections professionals around the country who work hard to keep our communities safe.

### 

                    - PPPS-pretrial-probation-parole-supervision-week  (69 kB)

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Trauma-Informed Practices for Criminal Courts: Implementation Opportunities  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Visits The National Judicial College  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Second Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Visits The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 1of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 2of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 3of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 4of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 5of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 6of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 7of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 8of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 9of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 10of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 11of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 12of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 13of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 14of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 15of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 16of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 17of 18

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1657-3    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 16:15:44    Page 18of 18
#### In re Interest of C.W., K.W., M.W., and J.W., children under 18 years of age. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. D.W., appellant.

469 N.W.2d 535

Filed May 24, 1991.

No. 90-356.

Sandra Hernandez Frantz for appellant.

Alicia B. Henderson, Deputy Lancaster County Attorney, for appellee.

Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.

White, J.

D.W. appeals the March 12, 1990, order of the separate juvenile court of Lancaster County staying its own order of January 10 as amended nunc pro tunc on January 31, 1990. The *216January 10 order terminated the parental rights of D.W. and the respective fathers of her four children, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-292(1), (2), (4), or (6) (Reissue 1988), and transferred the case to the Rosebud Sioux Tribal Court for placement of the children. Recognizing that an appeal from its order would likely be filed, the juvenile court stayed any change in placement of the children until a final order was issued on appeal. The court entered a nunc pro tunc order on January 31, 1990, amending its original order to provide for the stay. On March 12, the juvenile court granted another stay of the January 10 order as amended January 31, pending appeal and final decision by this court. D.W. filed her appeal of the March 12 stay in the separate juvenile court of Lancaster County on April 12.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2,126 (Reissue 1988) provides that any order or judgment entered by a separate juvenile court may be reviewed by this court within the same time and in the same manner prescribed by law for review of an order or judgment of the district court. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1912(1) (Reissue 1989) requires that the proceedings for reversal, modification, or vacation of judgments rendered or orders made by the district court shall be by filing a notice of appeal in the district court within 30 days of rendition of the judgment or order. Thus, an appeal from an order of a separate juvenile court must be filed within 30 days.

Following the statutory method for computing time found in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2221 (Reissue 1989), we find that D.W. filed her notice of appeal on the 31st day following the March 12 order. Beginning computation on the day following issuance of the order, March 13, 1990, the 30th and last day for appeal fell on Wednesday, April 11, 1990. We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction by this court.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT D

Core/2002 First Class Mail Service List

Served via First Class Mail

DESCRIPTION NAME 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Attn: General C888 First St NE

Washington DC 

Counsel to International Business Machines Corp IBM Corporation

Attn: Marie‐Jos

275 Viger East

Montreal QC H2Canada

Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service

Centralized Inso2970 Market St

Philadelphia PA 

Interested Party John A. Vos A John A. Vos

1430 Lincoln AvSan Rafael CA 9

Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of

California

Office of the United States Attorney for the

Northern District of California

Federal BankruAttn: Bankruptc450 Golden Gat

San Francisco C

Interested Party Placer County Office of the Treasurer‐Tax

Collector

PLACER COUNTY OFFICE OF THE TREASURER‐

TAX COLLECTOR

2976 Richardso

Attn: Robert Ka

Auburn CA 9560

Interested Party Provencher & Flatt Provencher & Flatt, LLP

Attn: Douglas b

823 Sonoma AvSanta Rosa CA 9

Counsel for Project Management, Inc. Synergy Project Management, Inc.

c/o Law Office o1017 Andy Circl

Sacramento CA 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Attn: General CU.S. NRC Region 1600 E. Lamar BArlington trust 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Attn: General CWashinton DISC

Counsel to the United States of America, Department of Energy

United States Department of Justice CivilDivision

Attn: Matthew 

1100 L Street, NRoom 10030

Washington DC 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1839-4 Filed: 05/03/19 Entered: 05/03/19 16:45:38 Pag

Page 1 of 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4801 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4801

To require the Secretary of Energy to prepare a report on the impact of 
 thermal insulation on both energy and water use for potable hot water.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2014

Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois (for himself and Mr. McNerney) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Energy to prepare a report on the impact of 
 thermal insulation on both energy and water use for potable hot water.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON ENERGY AND WATER SAVINGS POTENTIAL FROM THERMAL 
              INSULATION.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with appropriate 
Federal agencies and relevant stakeholders, shall submit to the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a 
report on the impact of thermal insulation on both energy and water use 
systems for potable hot and chilled water in Federal buildings, and the 
return on investment of installing such insulation.
    (b) Contents.--The report shall include--
            (1) an analysis based on the cost of municipal or regional 
        water for delivered water and the avoided cost of new water; 
        and
            (2) a summary of energy and water savings, including short 
        term and long term (20 years) projections of such savings.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.4
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except as disclosed in the Table of
Contents to Item 8 of the Report, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the
dates and periods covered by the Report.
 /s/ Richard  J. NadeauRichard J. NadeauDate: October 15, 2008
    Chief Financial Officer
|Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



The Board of Directors of
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.


We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-83835) and
on Form S-8 (333-72601, 333-72599, 333-09365, and 333-09375), of our report dated
March 9, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedules at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2003, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Jacksonville, Florida March 12, 2004


1
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------