alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






QORVO, INC.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM


The following is a summary of compensation paid to the directors of Qorvo, Inc. (the “Company”) effective August 10, 2015. For additional information regarding the director compensation, please read the definitive proxy statement relating to the Company’s 2016 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.


Compensation of Non-Employee Directors


The Company maintains a non-employee director compensation program pursuant to which our non-employee directors are paid as follows:


		
	•
	Annual cash retainer of $80,000 payable quarterly in arrears;


		
	•
	Additional annual retainer of $58,000 for the Non-Employee Chairman;


		
	•
	Additional annual retainer of $10,000 for the Lead Director;


		
	•
	Additional annual retainer for Committee Chairs;


		
	◦
	$20,000 for the Audit Committee Chair; 


		
	◦
	$20,000 for the Compensation Committee Chair; 


		
	◦
	$10,000 for the Governance and Nominating Committee Chair; and 


		
	◦
	$10,000 for the Corporate Development Committee Chair. 


		
	•
	Annual restricted stock unit award, representing shares of Company common stock valued at $170,000.




The annual restricted stock unit awards are granted on the date of the annual stockholders meeting at which directors are elected. Newly elected non-employee directors appointed to the Board other than at an annual stockholders meeting would receive a pro rata annual restricted stock unit award based on the number of full months remaining until the first annual stockholders meeting following the director’s initial appointment to the Board. Each award vests and becomes non-forfeitable as to 100% of the shares subject to the award on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service from the date of grant until the vesting date. 


Directors may defer all or a portion of their cash retainers by participating in our Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.


Directors are eligible to participate in our group medical and dental plans.


Directors are reimbursed for customary expenses for attending Board and committee meetings.


Compensation of Directors who are Employees of the Company 


Directors who are employees of the Company are not paid for their service as a director.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AC10-42-000]

Take notice that on January 6, 2010, Longhorn Partners Pipeline L.P. submitted a request for the waiver of the requirement to file the third quarter 2009 FERC Form No. 6-Q from July 1, 2009 through July 29, 2009.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     February 3, 2010.                

Kimberly Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-1192 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Vice President of Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of INTERMET Corporation (the Company), hereby certify,
based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Gary F. RuffGary F. Ruff
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Robert E. BeltsRobert E. Belts
Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)Date: August 9, 2004
.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

Exhibit 1 

Engagement Letter 

 

Entered on Docket 

May 24, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 1

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 2

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 3

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 4

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 5

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 6

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 7

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 8

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 9

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 10

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 11

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 12

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 13

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 14

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 15

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 16

of 17
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2229-1 Filed: 05/24/19 Entered: 05/24/19 17:06:07 Page 17

of 17
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.2


[ACNIELSEN LOGO]


                                                           Santiago, May 8, 2006

Senor,
Pablo Sanchez
Gerente General
Presente

CONSENT

We hereby consent to use of our market share information from our "ACNielsen
Retail Index for Beer Category", based on ACNielsen distribution channels from
year 2000 to 2005 in Arica to Puerto Montt within cities of more than 30,000
inhabitants, on Form 20-F of Quilmes industrial (Quinsa) Societe Anonyme. We
further consent to the use of our name in such Form 20-F and to the filling of
this consent as an exhibit thereto.


/s/ Cristobal Ceballos Moura
----------------------------
Cristobal Ceballos Moura
Client Service
ACNielsen Chile

ACNielsen Chile S.A.
Tajamar 183 - Piso 8
Las Condes, Santiago, CHILE                            [A VNU BUSINESS LOGO]
Tel 562.463-2700
Fax 562.463-2800
http://acnielsen.com
**Exhibit
        32(b)**
 
 **Certification
        of**
 **Chief
        Financial Officer**
 **Of
        99¢ Only Stores**
 
 This
        certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the
        period ended March 31, 2007 of 99¢ Only Stores (the "Issuer").
 
 I,
        Robert
        Kautz, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that to the best
        of my
        knowledge:
 
 (i)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
        and
 
 (ii)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Issuer.
 
 Dated:
        June 28, 2007
 
 
 By:   /s/
        Robert Kautz
 Name:   Robert
        Kautz
 Title:     Chief
        Financial Officer
CONSENT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR



To the Board of Directors of
Cordiant Communications Group plc



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements No.
33-11622, No. 33-41650 and No. 333-31508, on Form S-8 of Cordiant plc filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on 29 January 1987, 15 July 1991 and 2
March 2000,  respectively,  and of our report dated 7 March 2000 relating to the
consolidated   balance   sheets  of  Cordiant   Communications   Group  plc  and
subsidiaries,   and  the   related   consolidated   statements   of   operation,
shareholders'  deficiency and other share capital,  total  recognised  gains and
losses and cash flows for each of the years in the three  year  period  ended 31
December  1999,  which report  appears in the 31 December  1999 annual report on
Form 20-F of Cordiant Communications Group plc.



                                                   KPMG Audit Plc
London, England                                    Chartered Accountants
19 May 2000                                        Registered Auditor
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6144

ANTONIO RENALDO JACKSON-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA03-1790-8-PJM) Submitted: November 24, 2004 Decided: January 11, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Renaldo Jackson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Antonio Renaldo Jackson-Bey, a Maryland prisoner, seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. Because Jackson-Bey’s notice of appeal was filed outside the thirty-day appeal period set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), and the district court concluded on remand that Jackson-Bey failed to demonstrate excusable neglect or good cause for the late filing, we lack jurisdiction over Jackson-Bey’s appeal. See Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (stating the appeal periods established by Rule 4 are mandatory and jurisdictional). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# States in the Senate | South Carolina Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

 1. Elected Dec. 12, 1832. Took oath Jan. 4, 1833. Vice president during interim.

 2. Vacancy from Mar. 4 to Nov. 26, 1845.

 3. Withdrew from the Senate Nov. 10, 1860. Expelled July 11, 1861. Because of Civil War, vacancy from Nov. 10, 1860, to July 14, 1868.

 4. By legislature, to fill vacancy in term beginning Mar. 4, 1865. Seated July 20, 1868.

 5. Elected on Nov. 2, 1954, to full term beginning Jan. 3, 1955; subsequently appointed by governor to fill vacancy in term ending Jan. 3, 1955.

 6. Vacancy from Aug. 17 to Dec. 3, 1846.

 7. Withdrew from Senate Nov. 11, 1860. Because of Civil War, vacancy from Nov. 11, 1860, to July 15, 1868.

 8. By legislature, to fill vacancy in term beginning Mar. 4, 1867. Seated July 22, 1868.

 9. Scott was appointed on January 2, 2013, and resigned his House of Representatives seat that day. His Senate term began before the 112th Congress ended at 12:00 noon on Jan. 3.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
#### Sophie M. La Grave v. Leopold Hellinger.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officers of Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertify that to their knowledge and in their respective capacities that theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certification isattached (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date: August 7,  2009 |   | By:    | /s/ ANTHONY S. MARUCCI                 |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Name:  | Anthony S. Marucci                     |
|                       |   | Title: | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                       |   |   |                                   |
| Date: August 7,  2009 |   | By:    | /s/ AVERY W. CATLIN                    |
|                       |   | Name:  | Avery W. Catlin                        |
|                       |   | Title: | Senior Vice President  and             |
|                       |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                |

 

This certification shallnot be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CelldexTherapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2107 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:38:54 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2107 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:38:54 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2107 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:38:54 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2107 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/20/19 15:38:54 Page 4 of

4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. 84-102 

JIMMY RAY HEIDEMA, 

Personal Representative of 

the Estate of Louis Heidema, 

Jr., Deceased, AGNES HEIDEMA, 

LOUIS J. HEIDEMA, JUDITH 

GAIL HEIDEMA, JIMMY RAY 

HEIDEMA, individually, and 

LEILA MAY HEIDEMA, d/b/a 

Heidema Partnership, 

Defendants and Appellants, 

FIRST BANK (N.A.)-BILLINGS, 

Plaintiff and Respondent. 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

AND OPINION 

The Heidemas appeal from an order of the District 

Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone 

County, sustaining plaintiff First Bank's objections to 

defendants' request for a jury trial. For the reasons 

stated below, we dismiss the appeal as premature. 

Plaintiff First Bank filed suit against the Heidemas 

in June, 1982, to recover monies due on two promissory 

notes. The Heidemas retained counsel, who filed a series of 

motions, including a motion to dismiss, before being removed 

and replaced by another attorney in September, 1982. An 

answer to the original complaint was filed shortly 

thereafter, but the answer did not contain a demand for jury 

trial. A pretrial conference was held in June, 1983, with a 

non-jury trial scheduled for later that month. Three days 

before trial, defendants sought and obtained a continuance, 

after which time defendants' attorney withdrew as counsel of 

record. 

In October, defendants, acting pro se, filed an 

amended answer with a request for jury trial. The amended 
answer is more detailed than the original answer, and sets 

forth several affirmative defenses and counterclaims against 

First Bank. However, it appears that both the original and 

the amended answer relate to the same conduct, transaction 

or occurrence in dispute. 

First Bank filed objections to the late request for 

jury trial. Upon examination of the pleadings, the District 

Court sustained the objections and denied defendants' demand 

for jury trial. Defendants appeal from this denial. 

We dismiss this appeal as premature. Denial of a 

timely - or belated request for a jury trial is not a final 

judgment appealable under Rule l(a), M.R.App.Civ.P. The 

denial is in the nature of an interlocutory order, and can 

only be made appealable by specific rule or statute. 

Neither Rules l(b) or l(c), M.R.App.Civ.P., which enumerate 

certain orders that fall short of final judgment but which 

are appealable, provide for immediate appeal of a denial of 

demand for jury trial. Any improprieties involved in the 

denial are reversible only upon appeal from the final 

judgment in the case. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The appeal is dismissed as premature. 

2. The Clerk is directed to mail a true copy of this 

Order to the defendants and counsel for plaintiff. 

DATED this 3& day of July, 1984. 

Justices 

-2-
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Kennedy, Relator, v. Theodore A. Bingham, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Writ dismissed and proceedings affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Exhibit 23(i)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ASSAYER


Health Care Centers of America, Inc.

     I hereby consent to the filing of my report dated February 9, 1996,
relating to seven mineral claims belonging to Health Care Centers of America,
Inc., in Clark County, Nevada, with the annual report of Health Care Centers of
America, Inc., filed on Form 10-KSB in accordance with Section 13 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

     I further consent to the reference to my name in such report, to the effect
that I have tested three samples delivered to me from such claims, and that such
samples indicate commercial quantities of precious metals, including gold,
platinum, iridium, and osmium.

                                  Metallurgical Research & Assay Laboratory

                                  By:   /s/ Donald E. Jordan
                                        -----------------------
                                        Donald E. Jordan


Henderson, Nevada
April 25, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,659
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,222
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     27,392
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          9,297
<ALLOWANCE>                                        506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,626
<DEPOSITS>                                      39,495
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                465
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  48,626
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    916
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,218
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    30
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,164
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,812
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,812
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,352
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (24)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  17
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    217
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        737
<LOANS-PAST>                                       799
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     6
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   482
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  506
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            220
        


</TABLE>
#### Morris Markow v. North Central Realty Company, Impleaded, etc.

Motion denied, without costs.