alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12315]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (10-060)]

NASA Advisory Council; Commercial Space Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the Commercial Space Committee of 
the NASA Advisory Council.

DATES: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 1 p.m.-4 p.m., EDST.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW., MIC 3-A/3H46-A, 
Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Emond, Innovative 
Partnerships Program, Office of Chief Technologist, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546. Phone 202-
358-1686, fax: 202-358-3878, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be a deliberation by the 
committee on commercial crew and commercial cargo development, 
incorporating in the deliberation the presentations the committee 
received over the past three committee meetings. The meeting will be 
open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is 
imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the 
scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will need to 
show a valid picture identification such as a driver's license to enter 
the NASA Headquarters building (West Lobby--Visitor Control Center), 
and must state that they are attending the NASA Advisory Council 
Commercial Space Committee meeting in MIC3. All non-U.S citizens must 
fax a copy of their passport, and print or type their name, current 
address, citizenship, company affiliation (if applicable) to include 
address, telephone number, and their title, place of birth, date of 
birth, U.S. visa information to include type, number, and expiration 
date, U.S. Social Security Number (if applicable), and place and date 
of entry into the U.S. fax to John Emond, NASA Advisory Council, 
Commercial Space Committee Executive Secretary, Fax: (202) 358-3878, by 
no later than Thursday June 10, 2010. To expedite admittance, attendees 
with U.S. citizenship can provide identifying information 3 working 
days in advance by contacting John Emond via e-mail at 
[email protected] or by telephone at (202) 358-1686 or fax: (202) 
358-3878.

    Dated: May 18, 2010.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-12315 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
##### 



NS GROUP, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective February 17, 2005)
RESTRICTED SHARES AGREEMENT
 Notice of Restricted Share Grant
     Terms of Agreement
 1. Grant of Restricted Shares
 2. Vesting of Restricted Shares
  Portion of Restricted SharesVesting Date
    
    Vesting on such Vesting DateThe earlier of (i) May 9, 2009, or
(ii) the annual meeting of the
Companys stockholders in 2009
    
    
    100
    %
   Page 1 of 5




---



##### 



NS GROUP, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective February 17, 2005)
RESTRICTED SHARES AGREEMENT
 Portion of RestrictedTermination of Service Occurs
    
    Shares VestingOn or after May 9, 2007 (or, if earlier,
the annual meeting of the Companys
stockholders in 2007) but before May 9,
2008 (or, if earlier, the annual meeting
of the Companys stockholders in 2008)
    
    
    1/3On or after May 9, 2008 (or, if earlier,
the annual meeting of the Companys
stockholders in 2008) but before May 9,
2009 (or, if earlier, the annual meeting
of the Companys stockholders in 2009)
    
    
    2/3On or after May 9, 2009 (or, if earlier,
the annual meeting of the Companys
stockholders in 2009)
    
    
    3/3
  3. Forfeiture of Shares
 4. Transferability
 5. Dividend, Voting and Other Rights provided however
 Page 2 of 5




---



##### 



NS GROUP, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective February 17, 2005)
RESTRICTED SHARES AGREEMENT
  6. Custody of Restricted Shares
 7. No Right to Reelection
 8. Taxes and Withholding
 9. Compliance with Law provided however
 10. Amendments
 11. Severability
 Page 3 of 5




---



##### 



NS GROUP, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective February 17, 2005)
RESTRICTED SHARES AGREEMENT
 12. Relation to Plan
 13. Successors and Assigns
 14. Governing Law
 15. Electronic Delivery.
 Page 4 of 5




---



##### 



NS GROUP, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective February 17, 2005)
RESTRICTED SHARES AGREEMENT
  NS GROUP, INC.By:Name:Title:  GranteeDate: Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 31.4

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Ken Goldman, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Yahoo! Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
September 17, 2013



By:

/S/ KEN GOLDMANKen GoldmanChief Financial Officer
May 9, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MICHAEL NORVIL, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00237-CV V.

BANK OF AMERICA, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on December 3, 2012. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Michael Norvil.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

.

John B. Coffman (Missouri Bar No.: 36591)

John B Coffman, LLC

871 Tuxedo Blvd.

St. Louis, MO 63119-2044

Phone: (573) 424-6779

Email: john@johncoffman.net

Attorney for AARP

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY,

 Debtors.

Case Nos. 19-30088 DM (Lead Case)

 19-30089 DM

Chapter 11

Jointly Administered

☐ Affects PG&E Corporation

☐ Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company

☒ Affects both Debtors

* All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case 

No. 19-30088 DM.

NO HEARING REQUESTED

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION 

OF ATTORNEY JOHN B. COFFMAN

PRO HAC VICE

Signed and Filed: April 30, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

April 30, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1765 Filed: 04/30/19 Entered: 04/30/19 12:00:32 Page 1 of

3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 .

John B. Coffman, whose business address and telephone number is:

John B Coffman, LLC

John B. Coffman (Missouri Bar No.: 36591)

871 Tuxedo Blvd.

St. Louis, MO 63119-2044

Phone: (573) 424-6779

Email: john@johncoffman.net

Is an active member in good standing of the bar of Missouri, having applied in the aboveentitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice 

basis, representing AARP.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice.

Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will

constitute notice to the represented party. All future filings in this action are subject to the

Bankruptcy Local Rules and Electronic Case Filing Procedures adopted by the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California.

** END OF ORDER **

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1765 Filed: 04/30/19 Entered: 04/30/19 12:00:32 Page 2 of

3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CONDITIONAL NON-OPPOSITION 2

COURT SERVICE LIST 

All ECF Recipients. 

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1765 Filed: 04/30/19 Entered: 04/30/19 12:00:32 Page 3 of

3
#### Elizabeth A. Lydecker, Respondent, *v.*Henry M. Valentine, Appellant.

*Contract to pay for room and boan'd*— *measure of damages for its bi'each.*

The proper measure of damages for *the*breach of a contract to pay for room and board is the profits which the plaintiff would have made if the defendant had carried out his contract, and proof of the amount of such profits must be given in order to furnish a basis for the making of an estimate of such damages.

Appeal by the defendant, Henry M. Valentine, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of Rockland county on the 3d day of October, 1892, upon a verdict rendered at the Rockland Circuit, and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

*Snider & Hopper,*for the appellant.

*A. S, Tompkins,*for the respondent.

Pratt, J.:

This action was for damages for breach of a contract for rooms and board with the plaintiff.

The complaint alleged that the defendant agreed to pay plaintiff for a room and board fourteen dollars per week from May 1 to November 1, 1890. That he did so pay'until June 1,1890, when he left the premises.

The court charged the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the amount of the contract price for board and room less the amount of $107, which the plaintiff had from other parties for the same room. This we think was error. The damages could not be the whole contract price, but only what the plaintiff lost by defendant not being there, *i. e.,*the profits she would have made if defendant had carried out the contract.

The defendant’s counsel asked the court to charge that proposition, but the court refused, to which exception was taken.

The case was bare of evidence on which damages could be computed. The plaintiff ought to have proved how much profit she *195could have made if defendant had kept his contract, as a basis for the jury to estimate the damages. (See *Wetmore*v. Jaffray, 9 Hun, 140; *De Lavalette*v. *Wendt,*11 id. 432.)

The judgment should be reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Barnard, P. J,, and Dykman, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event.
#### JAMES COOPER v. T. BODDIE WARD, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of North Carolina.

(Filed 1 March, 1944.)

(See S. *v. Cooper, post,*100.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Harris, J.,*at Chambers, 24 January, 1944. From WaKE.

Civil action for *mandamus*to require defendant to deliver to plaintiff his driver’s license surrendered under judgment of Superior Court and forwarded to and now in possession of defendant.

These facts in summary appear from the pleadings: Plaintiff, as defendant in a criminal proceeding in the Superior Court of Forsyth County, on 10 January, 1944, pleaded guilty to a violation of the traffic laws of the State of North Carolina, with which he was charged. Thereupon, the court entered judgment “that the defendant surrender his driver’s license to the clerk of this court and not operate a motor vehicle for a period of twelve (12) months and . . . pay a fine of $25.00 and the costs,” and ordered the defendant there into custody of sheriff until costs and fine be paid and the driver’s license be surrendered to the clerk. Defendant there, in ignorance of his rights, and while his counsel was engaged in other matters before the court, and to avoid going to jail, complied with the judgment, and surrendered his driver’s license to the clerk. The counsel, ascertaining that his client had complied with terms of the judgment, made demand upon the clerk for return of the costs and fine paid, and of the driver’s license surrendered as aforesaid, to the end that defendant there might appeal from said judgment to the Supreme Court. But the clerk refused to comply with the demand without an order from the court, and the court refused to enter such order. Whereupon the clerk forwarded the license to Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of North Carolina, defendant in this action, who, while conceding that he has not revoked or suspended said license, declines to return it until such time as said judgment is reversed or modified by the courts of North Carolina.

In the present action the court, while finding facts substantially as alleged in the complaint and admitted in the answer, denied the writ of *mandamus*upon ground that an order therefor would be in effect a review of the judgment of another judge of Superior Court. Plaintiff appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.

*Felix L. Webster for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Adams for defendant, appellee.*

*100Winborne, J.

Upon bearing in tbis Court, tbe parties baying agreed tbat tbe complaint in tbis action might be treated as petition for writ of *certiorari*in tbe case of *S. v. James Cooper,*No. 4091, in Superior Court of Eorsytb County, to tbe judgment in wbicb tbis action relates, tbis appeal will be, and is hereby dismissed, and each party shall pay bis own costs.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of CardioTech International, Inc., aMassachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Szycher,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
|                          |   | /s/ MICHAEL SZYCHER                  |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Michael Szycher,                     |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
| Date: June 26, 2006 |   |                                 |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

Stephen Karotkin (pro hac vice) 

(stephen.karotkin@weil.com) 

Ray C. Schrock, P.C. (pro hac vice) 

(ray.schrock@weil.com) 

Jessica Liou (pro hac vice) 

(jessica.liou@weil.com) 

Matthew Goren (pro hac vice) 

(matthew.goren@weil.com) 

New York, NY 10153-0119 

Tel: (212) 310-8000 

Fax: (212) 310-8007 

KELLER & BENVENUTTI LLP 

Tobias S. Keller (#151445) 

(tkeller@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

Jane Kim (#298192) 

(jkim@kellerbenvenutti.com) 

650 California Street, Suite 1900 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Tel: (415) 496-6723 

Fax: (415) 636-9251 

Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

 - and - 

Bankruptcy Case No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11 

(Lead Case) (Jointly Administered) 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 

BETWEEN DEBTORS AND UNITED 

STATES TRUSTEE EXTENDING TIME 

TO RESPOND TO WILDFIRE 

ASSISTANCE PROGRAM MOTION 

[Related to Dkt No. 1777] 

[No Hearing Requested] 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

 Debtors. 

 Affects PG&E Corporation 

 Affects Pacific Gas and Electric Company 

Affects both Debtors 

* All papers shall be filed in the lead case, 

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Signed and Filed: May 16, 2019

________________________________________

DENNIS MONTALI

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket 

May 17, 2019

EDWARD J. EMMONS, CLERK 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2069 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/17/19 12:04:00 Page 1 of

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119

The Court having considered the Stipulation Between Debtors and United States Trustee 

Extending Time to Respond to Wildfire Assistance Program Motion (“Stipulation”), entered into 

by PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company, as debtors and debtors in 

possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) and the Office of the United States Trustee (the “U.S. 

Trustee”), filed on May 16, 2019; and, pursuant to such Stipulation and agreement of the 

Parties, good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The time for the U.S. Trustee to file and serve any response or opposition to the 

Wildfire Assistance Program Motion (as defined in the Stipulation) is extended through 

12:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on May 17, 2019. 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 

Dated: May 16, 2019

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE 

/s/ Marta E. Villacorta

Marta E. Villacorta

Trial Attorney 

Attorney for Andrew R. Vara, 

Acting United States Trustee for Region 31

**END OF ORDER** 

 

1 Andrew R. Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, is acting in this appointment for Tracy Hope Davis, 

United States Trustee for Region 17, who is recused from the above-captioned cases.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2069 Filed: 05/16/19 Entered: 05/17/19 12:04:00 Page 2 of

2
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32


                             REX Stores Corporation
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned officers of REX Stores Corporation (the "Company")
hereby certify, to their knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004, which this certificate accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



STUART A. ROSE
Stuart A. Rose


DOUGLAS L. BRUGGEMAN
Douglas L. Bruggeman


Dated:  June 9, 2004
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20948 Summary Calendar
JESSE NORTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas CA-H-94-3204
May 27, 1996 Before JOHNSON, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Jesse North appeals the district court’s denial of his request for judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”). The district court made its denial on the grounds of res judicata. North’s present suit stems from an award of benefits following a 1990 application. However, in this suit North effectively requested the district court to review the Commissioner’s decision not to reopen a January 1986 application2

for benefits. The district court is unable to fulfill this request because federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s decision not to reopen a prior, fully-adjudicated application. See Ellis v. Schw eiker , 662 F.2d 419, 419 (5th Cir. 1981). Therefore, we affirm the district court’s denial of judicial review of North’s application for benefits on the alternate ground that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s decision to reopen North’s case. See Sojourner T. V. Edw ards , 974 F.2d 27, 30 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 507 U.S. 972 (1993). AFFIRMED.