alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|   | /s/      JAMES A. HAYWARD    |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | James      A. Hayward        |   |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|   | May 15,      2009       |   |
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10508 Conference Calendar

__________________
RONNIE F. CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MAJ. SKIDMORE, Director of Administration; R. Hayes, Capt., Warden, Greenbay Facility; TARRANT COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-123-Y

- - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronnie F. Curry appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. He argues that the facility in which he is incarcerated has no law library and/or he was denied access to a law library or legal assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm forNo. 95-10508 -2- essentially the reasons given by the district court. Curry v. Skidmore , No. 3:95-CV-123-Y (N.D. Tex. April 28, 1995). In view of the disposition of Curry's appeal, his motion for leave to amend his complaint, motion for production of documents, and motion to compel production of documents are DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

____

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION, 

- and -

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, 

Debtors.

Bankruptcy Case

No. 19-30088 (DM) 

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Nabeela Ahmad, do declare and state as follows:

1. I am employed at Prime Clerk LLC (“Prime Clerk”), the claims and noticing agent

for the debtors in the above-referenced chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

2. On May 28, 2019, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Prime

Clerk caused the following documents to be served via First Class Mail on Wells Fargo Bank. c/o 

Telstra. Attn: Lisa Larpenteur (MMLID: 4931937), GPO Box 9901, Perth, CT, 06830: 

• Final Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to (A) Maintain Insurance Policies, Workers’

Compensation Program, and Surety Bond Program and (B) Pay All Obligations with

Respect Thereto; and (II) Granting Relief from the Automatic Stay with Respect to

Workers’ Compensation Claims [Docket No. 695]

• Final Order Authorizing Debtors To (A) Honor Prepetition Obligations to Natural Gas

and Electricity Exchange Operators, (B) Grant Administrative Expense Claims and

Authorize Posting of Collateral to Exchange Operators, Trading Counterparties, and

Future Commission Merchants, (C) Modify the Automatic Stay, and (D) Grant Related

Relief [Docket No. 696]

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2275 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 12:28:01 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2275 Filed: 05/30/19 Entered: 05/30/19 12:28:01 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 32.4

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to her knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) the Amendment No. 1 to Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2011 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ C. Marc Richards   
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | C. Marc Richards       
|Date: March 15, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-1848

Filed February 24, 2016

IN THE MATTER OF PROPERTY SEIZED FOR FORFEITURE

FROM SHELBY ANTHONY VOGT

SHELBY ANTHONY VOGT,

Applicant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Joel A. 

Dalrymple, Judge.

Shelby Anthony Vogt appeals from the denial of his third application for 

return of property forfeited in 2005. AFFIRMED. 

Shelby Anthony Vogt, Waterloo, pro se.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Kevin Cmelik and Heather Ann 

Mapes, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Vogel and Potterfield, JJ.
2

DANILSON, Chief Judge.

Shelby Vogt filed an application for return of property, which was forfeited 

by order dated September 6, 2005, following a hearing. No appeal followed the 

September 5, 2005 forfeiture. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.101(1)(b) (“A notice of 

appeal must be filed within 30 days after the filing of the final order or 

judgment.”). 

Vogt filed a second application for return of the same property in 2009. 

The district court entered an order on November 18, 2009, denying the 

application “[b]ecause the matter was previously litigated.” 

Vogt filed this third application for return of the same property and, on 

October 17, 2014, the district court dismissed the application. Vogt appealed, 

contending the original seizure of the property was illegal.

We review forfeiture proceedings for the correction of errors at law. In re 

Property Seized For Forfeiture From Williams, 676 N.W.2d 607, 612 (Iowa 2004). 

“Principles of res judicata preclude a court from relitigating an issue or 

claim that has been previously decided.” In re Marriage of Guyer, 522 N.W.2d 

818, 821 (Iowa 2003). “Res judicata as claim preclusion applies when a litigant 

has brought an action, an adjudication has occurred, and the litigant is thereafter 

foreclosed from further litigation on the claim.” Israel v. Farmers Mut. Ins. Ass’n 

of Iowa, 339 N.W.2d 143, 146 (Iowa 1983); see also State ex rel. Iowa Dep’t of 

Human Servs. v. Mundie, 436 N.W.2d 60, 61 (Iowa 1989). Because Vogt’s claim 

for return of property was tried and decided more than ten years ago, he may not 

relitigate the matter now. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF FOOTSTAR, INC.


     The registrant is the direct parent corporation of Footstar Center, Inc., a
California Corporation which owns all of the outstanding shares of Footstar
Corporation, a Texas Corporation which owns all of the outstanding shares of
Footaction Center, Inc., a New York Corporation, Meldisco H. C., Inc., a
Minnesota Corporation; Melville Mexico H. C., Inc. a Minnesota corporation;
Melville Altmex H. C., Inc. a Minnesota Corporation and Melville Foreign, Inc.,
a Minnesota Corporation.

     Footaction Center owns all of the outstanding shares of Rosedale Open
Country, Inc., a Minneosta Corporation, which owns all of the outstanding shares
of Mall of America Fan Club, Inc. and TM Apache Footaction, Inc. Mall of America
Fan Club, Inc. owns all of the outstanding shares of approximately 348
corporations which operate specialty retail stores is under the Footaction
tradename located in the United Sates, selling brand name athletic footwear and
related apparel for men, women and children.

     TM Apache Footaction, Inc. owns all of the outstanding shares of Pheasant
Thom McAn Inc., a New Hampshire corporation which owns all the outstanding
shares of approximately 285 corporations formed to operate specialty retail
stores under the Thom McAn or BOQ tradenames located in the United States,
Puerto Rico or the U. S. Virgin Islands selling men's and women's footwear.

     Meldisco H. C., Inc. owns all of the outstanding shares of Miles Shoes
Meldisco Lakewood, Colorado, Inc., a Colorado corporation which owns 51% of the
capital stock of approximately 2,499 corporations and 100% of the common stock
of approximately 1,043 corporations which were formed to operate leased footwear
departments in Kmart or Pay Less Drug Stores all located in the United States,
Puerto Rico, the U. S. Virgin Islands or Guam.

     Melville Mexico H. C., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Melville Altmex H.
C., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation and Melville Foreign, Inc., a Minnesota
Corporation directly or indirectly own all of the outstanding shares of
approximately 15 foreign subsidiaries involved in the registrants operations in
Mexico, Singapore, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

     Several of the subsidiaries referred to in this Exhibit have not yet opened
their stores for business, and several no longer operate any stores. All of the
subsidiaries referred to herein are included in the consolidated financial
statements of the registrant.

     The names of other subsidiaries are omitted as, considered in the aggregate
as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 29 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MARVIN BISHOP,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

LARRY EMBRY; ATTORNEY

GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF

COLORADO,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-1404

(D.C. No. 96-B-664)

(District of Colorado)

ORDER

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Marvin Bishop appeals the dismissal of his pro se petition for a writ of habeas

corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter is before us upon an application to

proceed without payment of fees and an application for certificate of appealability. 

Having established his inability to pay, Mr. Bishop is entitled to proceed in forma

pauperis. United States v. Simmonds, 111 F.3d 737 (10th Cir. 1997). The motion to

proceed without payment of fees is GRANTED.
- 2 -

We have examined the application for certificate of appealability and the record

and conclude Mr. Bishop has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by

showing the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could

resolve the issues differently, or that the questions deserve further proceedings.

Substantially for the reasons cited in the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the

certificate of appealability is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

Theundersigned officers of AVANT Immunotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certify to their knowledge and in their respective capacities that theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certificationis attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 8, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ UNA S. RYAN                       |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Name:  |   | Una S. Ryan, Ph.D.                    |
|                      |   | Title: |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |   |   |   |                                  |
| Date: August 8, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ AVERY W. CATLIN                   |
|                      |   | Name:  |   | Avery W. Catlin                       |
|                      |   | Title: |   | Senior Vice President and             |
|                      |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

Thiscertification shall not be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Exchange Act.

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 28, 2014

h0324

Order 

Clerk

March 28, 2014

148249

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148249

COA: 316039

Oakland CC: 2011-238973-FH

RHONDA ROXANNE LEMKE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                          
                                PRIMIX SOLUTIONS INC
                                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                               ---------------------
                                          
The following is a list of all subsidiaries of Primix Solutions Inc., and their
jurisdiction of incorporation, and the names under which they do business:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Name(s) under Which
Subsidiary            Jurisdiction of Incorporation   Subsidiary Does Business
----------            -----------------------------   ------------------------
<S>                   <C>                             <C>
Advis, Inc.           Delaware                        Advis, Inc.

OneWave Securities    Massachusetts                   OneWave Securities
Corporation                                           Corporation
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**


CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
        333-26575, 333-80185, and 333-66729 on Form S-8 of our report dated August
        30, 2005 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of 99¢ Only Stores for the year
        ended December 31, 2004.
  /s/
        DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 DELOITTE
        & TOUCHE LLP
  Los
        Angeles, California
 April 2,
        2007
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4801 

To require the Secretary of Energy to prepare a report on the impact 

of thermal insulation on both energy and water use for potable hot water. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2014 

Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois (for himself and Mr. MCNERNEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to prepare a report 

on the impact of thermal insulation on both energy and 

water use for potable hot water. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON ENERGY AND WATER SAVINGS PO4 TENTIAL FROM THERMAL INSULATION. 

5 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

6 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in con7 sultation with appropriate Federal agencies and relevant 

8 stakeholders, shall submit to the Committee on Energy 

9 and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee 

10 on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4801 IH

1 a report on the impact of thermal insulation on both en2 ergy and water use systems for potable hot and chilled 

3 water in Federal buildings, and the return on investment 

4 of installing such insulation. 

5 (b) CONTENTS.—The report shall include— 

6 (1) an analysis based on the cost of municipal 

7 or regional water for delivered water and the avoided 

8 cost of new water; and 

9 (2) a summary of energy and water savings, in10 cluding short term and long term (20 years) projec11 tions of such savings. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4788 

To provide regulatory relief for mid-sized financial institutions, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 30, 2014 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide regulatory relief for mid-sized financial 

institutions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Relief for America’s 

5 Main Street Lenders Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4788 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT 

2 AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 

3 1934. 

4 (a) DEFINITION OF FINANCIAL ENTITY.—Section 

5 2(h)(7)(C)(ii) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 

6 2(h)(7)(C)(ii)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘The Commission shall consider 

8 whether to exempt small banks, savings associations, 

9 farm credit system institutions, and credit unions, 

10 including—’’ and inserting ‘‘For purposes of this 

11 paragraph and solely with respect to an interest rate 

12 swap, the term ‘financial entity’ shall not include— 

13 ’’; and 

14 (2) in subclauses (I) and (III), by striking 

15 ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ each place such term appears 

16 and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

17 (b) DEFINITION OF FINANCIAL ENTITY.—Section 

18 3C(g)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 

19 U.S.C. 78c–3(g)(3)(B)) is amended— 

20 (1) by striking ‘‘The Commission shall consider 

21 whether to exempt small banks, savings associations, 

22 farm credit system institutions, and credit unions, 

23 including—’’ and inserting ‘‘For purposes of this 

24 subsection and solely with respect to an interest rate 

25 security-based swap, the term ‘financial entity’ shall 

26 not include—’’; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4788 IH

1 (2) in clauses (i) and (iii) by striking 

2 ‘‘$10,000,000,000 or less’’ each place such term ap3 pears and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000 or less’’. 

4 SEC. 3. AMENDMENTS TO THE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANS5 FER ACT. 

6 Section 920(g)(3) of the Electronic Fund Transfer 

7 Act (15 U.S.C. 1693o–1(g)(3)) is amended by inserting 

8 after the first instance of ‘‘financial institution’’ the fol9 lowing: ‘‘except for an insured depository institution or 

10 credit union with total assets of $50,000,000,000 or 

11 less,’’. 

12 SEC. 4. AMENDMENTS TO THE DODD-FRANK WALL STREET 

13 REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT. 

14 Section 165(i)(2)(C)(iv) of the Dodd-Frank Wall 

15 Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 

16 5365(i)(2)(C)(iv)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘subject 

17 to this paragraph’’ the following: ‘‘with total assets of 

18 $50,000,000,000 or more’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON DC 20549

FORM 10-QSB

QUARTERLY REPORT PUSRUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarter Ending March 31,2001     Commission File Number 21-16563-B

REII INCORPORATED
-----------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

DELAWARE                                       51-0373876
-----------------------------         ---------------------
(State or other Jurisdiction of       (IRS Employee Number)
(Incorporation Or Organization)

1051 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, NAPLES, FLORIDA        34102
------------------------------------------    ----------
 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)    (Zip Code)

 (941) 261-3396
----------------
(Registrant's Telephone Number
  Including Area Code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  [X]                             No_____


As of March 31, 2001   4,655,310 shares of common stock, $.001 par were
outstanding.


 .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<CURRENCY>                       U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                                  7,625
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          63,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      111,317
<PP&E>                                 34,996
<DEPRECIATION>                         10,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        419,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  59,211
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  219
<OTHER-SE>                            182,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          419,313
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      324,494
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         292,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      6,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        25,824
<INCOME-TAX>                            9,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    16,011
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           16,011
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.71



</TABLE>