alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

s1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145394 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145394

COA: 307181

Wayne CC: 06-001860-FC

WESLEY NEAL JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2158 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:41:53 Page 1 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2158 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:41:53 Page 2 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2158 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:41:53 Page 3 of

4
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2158 Filed: 05/20/19 Entered: 05/21/19 11:41:53 Page 4 of

4
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130789 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DAVID F. CLARK and ERLENE L. CLARK, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Justices 

v SC: 130789 

 COA: 256472 

Branch CC: 03-060350-CK 

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
••

▪▪▪▪▪▪▪

••

3
•

⚬⚬⚬

••••

4
•

⚬⚬⚬

5
•••••

6
••

7
8

•••••
9

••

••••••

••
10

••

▪▪▪▪▪
11

••••

▪▪

•

••
12
13

Description of SI Civil Categories

❖ Multiple Issues: This category includes cases that involve more than one SI Civil category. 

Allegations of retaliation are typically included in this category (along with the underlying 

reported incident or protected activity).

❖ Other: This category includes cases that were reported to SI Civil but, as reported, are 

outside the scope of SI Civil policies.

❖ For other specific definitions, see SI Civil policies (SD 217 and SD 225).

Case Count by Category
14

Description of Outcomes

❖ Other Actions or Outside Scope: This category includes complaints that were unsubstantiated or 

found to be unrelated to SI Civil’s scope. This category also includes informal or sometimes 

voluntary actions such as facilitated conversations, training, and additional supervisory support.

❖ Non-Disciplinary Corrective Actions: This category includes actions that are not disciplinary, such 

as letters of counseling, reassignments, and mandatory training.

❖ Discipline: This category includes letters of reprimand, suspensions and demotions.

❖ Removal: This refers to the termination of employment or affiliated individual privileges.

❖ Open: This refers to active cases where an outcome has yet to be determined.
15

•••••••••

▪▪▪▪
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2530 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2530

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 184.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2000

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 184.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 184.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.32.48    Pigment Yellow    Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     184 (provided                                                           31/2003          ''
                     for in                                                                                    .
                     subheading
                     3206.49.5000)..

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

t0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

143340

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 143340 COA: 304702 Oakland CC: 2011-236898-FH LEON JERMANE WALKER, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 22, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT B 4

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1662-5 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 17:03:55 Page 1

of 29
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001011028
<NAME>                        NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES INC.
<CURRENCY>                                               0

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           2,418,947
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,688,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,320,742
<PP&E>                                             512,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,806,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,956,842
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        20,489,637
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,380,414)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,806,713
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,170,649
<CGS>                                           11,955,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,074,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 161,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,979,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                       157,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,822,019
<DISCONTINUED>                                      70,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,892,019
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .50



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended March 31, 2003, of Commercial Federal Corporation as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003 (the "Report"), I, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge, the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Commercial Federal Corporation.

Date: May 15, 2003

                             By:  /s/ David S. Fisher
                                 ____________________________________________
                                  David S. Fisher
                                  Executive Vice President and Chief
                                  Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11

Computation of Earnings per Share
(dollars in thousands, except shares and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                           For the Three Months
                                                                              ended March 31
                                                                               1997       1996
<S>                                                                       <C>        <C>
Average shares outstanding                                                3,684,104  3,684,104
 
Impact of Treasury Shares                                                    24,609     16,984
                                                                          ---------  ---------
Total                                                                     3,659,495  3,667,120
                                                                          =========  ========= 
Net Income                                                                   $1,538     $1,309
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders                                  $1,227     $1,193
 
Earnings Per Share Available to Common Shareholders                            $.34       $.33
 
</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2136

To temporarily suspend the duty on benzenesulfonamide,4-amino-2,5-

dimethyoxy-N-phenyl.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 1, 2000

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To temporarily suspend the duty on benzenesulfonamide,4-

amino-2,5-dimethyoxy-N-phenyl.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BENZENESULFONAMIDE,4-AMINO-2,5-

4 DIMETHYOXY-N-PHENYL.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:
2

•S 2136 IS

‘‘ 9902.29.96 benzensulfonamide, 4-amino-2,5-

dimethyoxy-Nphenyl (CAS No.

52298–44–9)

(provided for in

subheading

2935.00.10) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section shall apply to goods entered, or withdrawn

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2134

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 1, 2000

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SOLVENT BLUE 104.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.72 Solvent Blue 104

(CAS No. 116–

75–6) (provided

for in subheading

3204.19.20) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section shall apply to goods entered, or withdrawn
2

•S 2134 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					ANNOUNCEMENT				

## Upcoming Webinar! Breaking Barriers: Inclusive Communication for People with Disabilities in Court

Upcoming Webinar! Breaking Barriers: Inclusive Communication for People with Disabilities in Court.

When? **Wednesday, January 31st, 2024, at 12:00PM EST.**

Clear and accessible communication is fundamental to ensure that everyone can fully participate in the court process. People with disabilities are no exception and have a right to effective communication – meaning that whatever is written or spoken must be accessible.

Join National Center for State Courts for an insightful webinar about the diverse ways people with disabilities communicate and learn effective strategies for court personnel to better serve and reduce barriers for this population.

Register here.

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Trauma-Informed Practices for Criminal Courts: Implementation Opportunities  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Visits The National Judicial College  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Second Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Visits The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7657

CHARLES RICHARD FLINT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus HOWARD PAINTER, Acting Warden, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-98-691-5) Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Richard Flint, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell v. McGraw, Jr.,Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Richard Flint appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt's opinion adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Flint v. Painter , No. CA-98-691-5 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### David Pomerantz, Appellant, v. Filomena Pirozzi and Joseph Pirozzi, Respondents.

Plaintiff’s testimony, if true, establishes a contract by the defendants under which he was to perform the work at ’an agreed price. It is uncontradieted. There is nothing improbable in his testimony, and the court should not have rejected it. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
<PAGE>


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption Selected Financial
Data, and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-16525) pertaining to the Physiometrix, Inc. 1991 Stock Plan, 1996
Director Option Plan, and 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated
February 20, 1998, with respect to the financial statements of Physiometrix,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1997.


                                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1998
**Exhibit
      23.2**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-26575, 333-80185 and 333-66729) of 99 Cents Only Stores of our
      reports dated February 27, 2004, except for Note 2 as to which the date is
      July
      18, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
      which appear in this Form 10-K.











PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP





Los
      Angeles, California


September
      6, 2005
**Exhibit 23.2**

July 15, 2013 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation in this Annual Report of AdvanSource Biomaterials Corporation and Subsidiary (collectively, the "Company") on Form 10-K of our report dated July 11, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2012.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated July 11, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2012, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-117594, 333-106607 and 333-05893).

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statements. 

/s/  Moody, Famiglietti & Andronico, LLP

Moody, Famiglietti & Andronico, LLP

Tewksbury, Massachusetts
surge_8k-ex1077.htm


    Exhibit
10.77

    


    MEMORANDUM
OF AGREEMENT

    BETWEEN
SURGE GLOBAL ENERGY, INC. AND FREDERICK C. BERNDT

    


    This Memorandum of Agreement
(“Agreement”) is entered into as of June 11, 2009, by and between Frederick C.
Berndt (“Berndt”), the Chief Executive Officer of 11 Good Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”),  and Surge Global Energy, Inc. (“Surge”).

    


    The parties hereto agree that in
exchange for (1) payment of $297,057, comprising the total due on that certain
note between the Company and Surge, including principal, interest, legal fees,
and costs, on or before June 12, 2009, and (2) waiver of any and all rights
related to warrants for Surge Global Energy, Inc. stock, Surge will provide
Berndt with an option to purchase 500,000 shares of 11 Good Energy stock held by
Surge at $1.00 per share, such option to expire on September 21,
2009.

    


    If the above-referenced payment is not
made on or before June 12, 2009, this agreement will have no
effect.

    


    The undersigned parties, having read
the foregoing Agreement and fully understanding it and agreeing to its terms,
hereby execute this Agreement and make it effective on the date indicated
above.

    


    


    Frederick
C. Berndt

    


    /s/ Frederick C.
Berndt                                         

    Frederick
C. Berndt

    


    


    Surge
Global Energy, Inc.

    


    /s/ E. Jamie
Schloss                                               

    By E.
Jamie Schloss, Chief Executive Officer
#### Herman Van Slochem, Respondent, v. British Columbia Railway and Development Company, Appellant, Impleaded wth Jean Wolkenstein and Roscoe Conklin.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-35257, 333-35259, 333-38657, 333-38659,
333-59783, 333-59797 and 333-40858) of Peritus Software Services, Inc. of our
reports dated February 20, 2001 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 2001
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00852

- CV

IN RE ANDERSON COLUM BIA CO., INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

On March 27, 2019, the real parties in interest filed a Motion for Emergency Relief.

After considering the motion, all relief requested in the motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on March 27, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15

- 03

- 31056

- MCV , styled Jerold Givens, et al

. v. Salatiel Polanco, et al.

, pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court

, Maverick County, Texas . T he Honorable Gloria Saldana signed the

complained

- of order.
#### Seymour W. Shriver, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.