alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 12, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 12, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0132. U-HAUL CO. OF ARIZONA et al. v. MARGARET RUTH RUTLAND, AS SURVIVING SPOUSE et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17CV1641
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sarah T. Beaton, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, U.S.-Brazil Higher Education Consortia Program, 1990 K Street, NW., Room 6154, Washington, DC 20006-8544. Telephone: (202) 502-7621.

If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.

## VIII. Other Information

*Accessible Format:*                         Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         in section VII of this notice.                    

*Electronic Access to This Document:*                         You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:                         *http://www.ed.gov/​news/​fedregister.*                         To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site.                    

                        Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the                         **Federal Register**                        . Free Internet access to the official edition of the                         **Federal Register**                         and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at:                         *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html.*

*Delegation of Authority:*                         The Secretary of Education has delegated authority to Daniel T. Madzelan, Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis for the Office of Postsecondary Education, to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.                    

Dated: January 15, 2010.

Daniel T. Madzelan,

Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis.

[FR Doc. 2010-1232 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
ACTIONS OF THE SEPTEMBER 6, 2017, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the Smithsonian Institution’s budget request for appropriated funds for 

fiscal year 2019 for presentation to the Office of Management and Budget. Any material 

changes in program plans incorporated into this budget shall be made only with the approval of 

the Board of Regents or its Executive Committee.

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the full Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves a one-year extension of the KPMG contract to cover fiscal year 2018 audit 

services.
#### In the Matter of Charles Shamroth, an Attorney.

Reference ordered. Order to be settled on notice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the decision to designate a class of employees from Westinghouse Electric Corp., Bloomfield, New Jersey, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On April 5, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at Westinghouse Electric Corp., Bloomfield, New Jersey, from August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1949, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on May 5, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on May 5, 2010, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-11882 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 33-47469) and in the related Prospectus pertaining to the registration
of $750,000,000 in Debt Securities, Preferred Shares, Depositary Shares, Common
Stock Warrants and Common Stock, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-
65833) pertaining to the registration of 3,452,181 Shares of Common Stock, the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-41433) pertaining to the registration
of 3,713,331 Shares of Common Stock, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-44997) pertaining to the registration of 728,929 Shares of Common Stock, the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-09945) pertaining to the BRE
Properties, Inc. Dividend Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-69217) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated 1992 Employee Stock Plan, the Amended and Restated Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan, and the Consultancy Stock Option Agreement dated
March 2, 1998, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-02257) pertaining to
the Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of BRE
Properties, Inc. and the Assumed Real Estate Investment Trust of California 1991
Officer Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-61209)
pertaining to the BRE Properties, Inc. 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan and
Chief Executive Officer Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-60082) pertaining to the BRE Properties, Inc. 1992 Employee Stock Option
Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-5389) pertaining to the BRE
Properties, Inc. 1984 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-09945) and in the related Prospectus pertaining to the registration of
2,000,000 Shares of Common Stock, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-30646) pertaining to the 1999 BRE Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated
January 18, 2000, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BRE Properties,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and related financial schedule, as amended, included in
this Form 10-K/A.

                                                    /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Francisco, California
July 31, 2000
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11953]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

Broadengate Systems, Inc., (n/k/a Otter Lake Resources, Inc.); 
Order of Suspension of Trading

May 14, 2010.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Broadengate Systems, Inc. (n/k/a Otter Lake Resources, Inc.) because it 
has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 
2002.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for 
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 14, 2010 and terminating at 11:59 
p.m. EDT on May 27, 2010.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11953 Filed 5-14-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2015 

# Order

Clerk January 27, 2015

149502 (47)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 149502

v COA: 314375

Leelanau CC: 12

- 001777

- FH

JOSEPH WILLIAM MILLER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellee to extend the time

for filing his brief on appeal is GRANTED IN PART

. The brief will be accepted as

timely filed if submitted on or before February 3, 2015, not February 6, 2015, as

requested.
J

- S28017

- 17

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON
- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION
– SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee
v.
LUIS LOPEZ,
Appellant : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1078 WDA 2016
Appeal from the Order June 23, 2016, in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, Criminal Division, at No(s): CP

- 25

- CR

- 0002525

- 2015

BEFORE: OLSON, MOULTON, and STRASSBURGER, JJ.*
CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED AUGUST 11, 20 17
I agree with the Majority that Lopez was seized at the time Officer
Russell began chasing him, and that, at that time, Officer Russell had
reasonable suspicion to do so given that (1) the officer had credible
information that Lopez was carrying a firea rm, (2) Lopez was ineligible to do
so based upon his age, and (3) Lopez fled when he was asked if he had any

firearms on him.
However, I believe a person of reasonable caution would believe that
criminal activity may be afoot when presented with those t hree facts in any neighborhood. The status of the neighborhood at issue here as a “high

crime area” is not relevant to the determination. People who live in poor
areas that are riddled with crime do not have fewer constitutional rights than
people who ha ve the means to live in “nice” neighborhoods.
**Exhibit 10.22**

 

**FOURTHAMENDMENT TO THEMIRANT CORPORATIONDEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANFOR DIRECTORS AND SELECT EMPLOYEES**

**THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT**to the Mirant Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and Officers(the “Plan”) is made this 8th day of December, 2005.

 

I.

 

Section 5.l(d) of the Plan shall bedeleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

(d)                                 “Effectiveas of December 8, 2005, all deferred Compensation and Transferred Amounts(and accumulated investment return related thereto) invested in a Phantom StockInvestment Account shall be transferred to a Prime Rate Investment Account, andthe Phantom Stock Investment Accounts shall be eliminated.”

 

II.

 

Section 6.3 of the Plan shall be deletedin its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“6.3                           InvestmentExchange.

 

(a)          Prior to December 8,2005, a Director or Employee may elect on an Investment Exchange Date totransfer his deferred Compensation and his Transferred Amounts (and accumulatedinvestment return related thereto) from one Deferred Compensation Account toanother, except that no investment transfer election which causes short swingprofit issues will be honored.

 

(b)         Effective as of December 8,2005, all deferred Compensation and Transferred Amounts (and accumulated investmentreturn related thereto) invested in a Phantom Stock Investment Account shall betransferred to a Prime Rate Investment Account, and the Phantom StockInvestment Accounts shall be eliminated.”

 

III.

 

Except as amended herein by this FourthAmendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as amended by theCompany prior to the adoption of this Fourth Amendment.

 

----

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,**Mirant Corporation, through its duly authorized officer pursuant to a unanimousconsent of the Committee dated December 8, 2005, has adopted this ThirdAmendment to the Mirant Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directorsand Select Employees, this 8th day of December, 2005, to be effective asprovided herein.

 
|   |   | **MIRANT CORPORATION:** |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |                    |
|   |   |                    |
|   |   | By:                     | /s/ Vance N. Booker |   |
|   |   |                    | Vance N. Booker  SVP, Administration |   |

 

2

----
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30749

Summary Calendar

 

TERRY HOLLOWELL; JILL HOLLOWELL

Plaintiff-Appellants

versus

KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CV-10-K

--------------------

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terry Hollowell and Jill Hollowell (hereinafter Plaintiffs)

filed suit in the district court of the Parish of St. James,

Louisiana against Terry Hollowell’s employer, Kaiser Aluminum and

Chemical Corporation (hereinafter Defendant) seeking recovery of

damages for injuries sustained by Terry Hollowell on December 27,

2002 when he fell approximately forty feet from the top of a

facility he was working on during the course of his employment by

Defendant and sustained serious and permanent injuries as a result.
No. 03-11266

-2-

Plaintiffs assert that these injuries were the result of

intentional acts of Defendant and therefore constitute an exception

to the provisions of the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Defendant removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana on diversity of citizenship and moved

for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiffs’s exclusive

remedy against Defendant was under the Louisiana Workmen’s

Compensation Act. The district court granted the motion for summary

judgment and Plaintiffs appeal.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and the record excerpts

and for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed

under date of June 30, 2004, we affirm the judgment entered by the

district court under date of June 30, 2004, dismissing with

prejudice Plaintiffs’ claims. AFFIRMED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-0594

_____________________________

CHASE ANDERSON ROMAGNANO,

Petitioner,

v.

JAMES CORDRAY BYRD, Secretary 

of State of Florida,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

April 25, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Chase Anderson Romagnano, pro se, Petitioner.
2

No appearance for Respondent.
Exhibit 32
                                                       ----------

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diversified Historic
Investors  on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March  31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Spencer Wertheimer, President  and
Treasurer of the Company's managing partner, EPK, Inc.,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all  material  respects, the financial condition and  results  of
operations of the Company.




Date: August 16, 2006       Name:  /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
      ---------------              ----------------------
                           Title:  President
                                   (principal executive
                                    officer) of the
                                    registrant's
                                    managing partner,
                                    EPK, Inc.

<PAGE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 005 31

- CR

Anthony Devern Session

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

o f Tarr ant County (130 28 51 D )

April 3 , 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

_______________________ Justice Bill Meier
Exhibit
23




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-149341, 333-149342, 333-149343, 333-117594, 333-106607 and
333-05893, Form SB-2 No. 333-122123, Form S-3 Nos. 333-110779 and 333-72223, and
Form S-4 No. 333-102115) of CardioTech International, Inc. and in the related
Prospectuses of our report dated June 24, 2008, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of CardioTech International, Inc., included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2008.














/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP




Boston,
Massachusetts


June
24,
2008
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May

11, 2021

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00075

- CV

IN RE KIRBY GARDNER , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20 20

- 61762

- 7

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N On February 8, 2021, r elator Kirby Gardener filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to compel the Honorable Elaine Palmer , the presiding judg e of the 215th District Court, to “allow litigating proceedings [in the underlying cause] to move forward to its conclusion.” Relator asserts he filed a petition for injunctive and declaratory relief on September 30, 2020 and, other than sending a
letter acknow ledging his petition was filed, the trial court has taken no further action “that would allow litigation to proceed forward.”2

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus omits most of the items required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3, including arg ument and supporting legal authority

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(h). The petition does not contain the required certification that relator has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in it is supported by competent evidence in the ap pendix or record. Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j). Relator did not file a record with his petition. Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a) ( relator must file record that includes (1) a certified or sworn copy of every
document that is material to the relator’s claim and (2) a pr operly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from the underlying proceeding).

We conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to mandamus relief. We deny
his petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ Kevin Jewell Justice

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Hassan (Bourliot, J., dissenting without opinion )