alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jeremiah Walters, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Henry Morgan, defendant in error.

Before Judge Strozier. Dougherty Superior Court. December Term, 1871.

Hines & Hobbs ; *Z.*P. Odum, for plaintiff in error.

D. H. Pope ; H. Morgan, for defendant.

When this case was called a motion was made by counsel for defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error, because the bill of exceptions failed to show that it was presented and certified to by the presiding Judge, within thirty clays from the adjournment of the Court at which the rulings complained of were made. It did not appear, from the record when the December Term, 1871, of the Superior Court of Dougherty county adjourned. The motion was sustained and the case dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# Date and Time: 

Friday, January 29, 2010; 11:30 a.m. EST.

      ( print page 3444)    

# Place: 

Via Teleconference, Public Dial In—1-800-597-7623, Conference ID # 52144588.

# Meeting Agenda:

This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda.

II. Program Planning.

Approval of Findings and Recommendations for*The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers*                     Report.                

III. State Advisory Committee Issues.
      - Pennsylvania SAC.

IV. Approval of January 15, 2010 Meeting Minutes.

V. Adjourn.

# Contact Person for Further Information:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Dated: January 19, 2010.

Martin Dannenfelser,

Staff Director.

[FR Doc. 2010-1214 Filed 1-19-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.02

                                                            Company's Prospectus
                                                                  April 22, 1996

                                                                         Page 90



In The Travelers Insurance Company, et al., v. Richard John Ratcliffe Keeling,
filed in New York Supreme Court in June 1991, Travelers P&C and certain of its
affiliates seek to enforce reinsurance contracts against certain underwriters at
Lloyd's and certain London companies with respect to recoveries for certain
asbestos claims. In January 1994, the court stayed litigation of this matter in
favor of arbitration. The issues before the arbitration panel include the
underwriters' breach of contract and anticipated breach of their agreement with
the plaintiffs on asbestos-related reinsurance claims. The Travelers P&C/Lloyd's
dispute related to asbestos recoveries involves approximately $100 million of
current ceded receivables and approximately $60 million collected by Travelers
P&C as of December 31, 1995, plus future potential recoverables. The dispute
will be determined by an arbitration panel at an arbitration commencing in May
1996, based on the panel's interpretation of the reinsurance arrangement between
Travelers P&C and Lloyd's.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4780 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4780

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a five-
 year extension of the rural community hospital demonstration program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 30, 2014

Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. Braley of Iowa, and 
Mr. King of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a five-
 year extension of the rural community hospital demonstration program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Community Hospital 
Demonstration Extension Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF THE RURAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Extension.--Section 410A of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 
Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173; 42 
U.S.C. 1395ww note), as amended by sections 3123 and 10313 of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(5), by striking ``5-year extension 
        period'' and inserting ``10-year extension period''; and
            (2) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading, by striking ``Five-
                Year'' and inserting ``Ten-Year'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``additional 5-
                year'' and inserting ``additional 10-year''; and
                    (C) by striking ``5-year extension period'' each 
                place it appears and inserting ``10-year extension 
                period''.
    (b) Change in Timing for Report.--Subsection (e) of such section 
410A is amended by striking ``Not later than 6 months after the 
completion'' and inserting ``Not later than 2 years prior to the 
completion''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Sunrise Assisted Living, Inc., as listed below, of our report dated February 24,
2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sunrise Assisted
Living, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     REGISTRATION
      STATEMENT
        NUMBER            FORM                                 DESCRIPTION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                    <C>               <C>
333-05257               Form S-8         1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1996 Directors' Stock Option Plan, Stock
                                         Option Agreement entered into, effective January 4, 1995, by and between Sunrise
                                         Assisted Living, Inc. and David W. Faeder
333-38430               Form S-8         1996 Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan, as Amended
333-26837               Form S-8         1997 Stock Option Plan
333-57291               Form S-8         1996 Directors' Stock Option Plan, as Amended
333-57293               Form S-8         1998 Stock Option Plan
333-78313               Form S-8         1999 Stock Option Plan
333-78543               Form S-8         Karrington Health, Inc. 1996 Incentive Stock Plan
333-38432               Form S-8         2000 Stock Option Plan
333-61918               Form S-8         2001 Stock Option Plan
333-88570               Form S-8         2002 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan
333-61914               Form S-8         Employee Stock Purchase Plan
333-85622               Form S-3         $125 million of 5  1/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due February 1, 2009
</TABLE>


                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, VA
March 25, 2003
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00244- CR

Gr egory M ichael Klapesky, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 26TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 03- 1063 -K 26, H ONO RAB LE B ILLY RAY STUB B LEF IELD, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R A N D ME M O R A N D UM O P I N I O N
P ER CURIAM

Appellant’s pro se brief was due in this Court on J uly 6, 2015. On J uly 14, the cler k of this Court sent a notice to appellant that if this Court did not rec ei v e t h e b ri ef or a satisfac tory response on or befor e Fr iday , J uly 24, a hear ing befor e the trial court would be order ed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). To date no re sponse has be en re ceive d from appe llant.

The appeal is abate d. The trial court shall conduct a hear in g to deter mine whether appellant has abandone d the appea l. See id. 38.8(b)( 2). The court shall make appropr iate finding s and rec ommendations. I f appropr iate and nece ssary , the court shall ap p o i nt counsel who will eff ectively repr esent appellant in this cause . A rec ord from this hear ing, i n cl u d ing copies of all finding s and order s and a transcr iption of the court repor ter’s notes, shall be forwa rded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental rec ord no later than August 31, 2015. See id. 38.8(b)( 3).I t is so ordered July 31, 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Abated a nd Remanded Filed: Jul y

31, 2015 Do Not Publish

2
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**

**,. ’**  **AUSTIN**

### HonorableBill 9. Vstkinr, we 2

guodr, eta., th@stofore reoelved, **by** hot aheok. While it 10

that Form2 ObXUl#je8 a violation Of seation a of e or the rtatuts, ve do not uudertake to dvlrs the q-To* quallQ of proof’ neoerrary to rwtaln the allegation or intent to defraud.’ Wenuke the 88aO ob8enatias.tith referencle'to **Farm** 

### 3 2'elatiQ-a

t0 pPapel?tj hovered by 

### a lien.

I APPROVED !dA[Ay

31, 1941 ATTOFiMEY

GFXEFIAL **very truly**  **yours**
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before KING , M C CONNELL , and FOIL , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Robert T. DOYLE Master

- at

- Arms Seaman (E

- 3 ), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 201900 051
Decided: 11 December 2019

. Appeal from the United States Nav y - Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

. Military Judge : Commander Hayes Larson, U.S. Navy . Sentence adjudged 23 October 2018 by a s pecial court

- martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia , consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 110 days , and a bad

- conduct discharge. For Appellant: Captain Scott F. Hallauer , JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding prec edent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)
.

_________________________ PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in lawUnited States v. Doyle , NMCCA No. 201900051

2 and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, J R. Clerk of Court
# Senators who have Participated in the Olympic Games

**

----

† Silver Medal

* Gold Medal

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-5668

_____________________________

DARRELL B. WESLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Waddell Wallace, Judge.

March 1, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WOLF and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Darrell B. Wesley, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael L. Schaub, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,694,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,694,000
<PP&E>                                     121,037,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (8,915,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             116,815,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,925,000
<BONDS>                                     63,342,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,506,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               116,815,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,197,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,751,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,724,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (81,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (81,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (99,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (180,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
Blueprint



Exhibit 4.1




 

CERTIFICATE OF DISSOLUTION

OF

SWISHER HYGIENE INC.

(Pursuant to Section 275(a) and (b) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

 

Swisher Hygiene Inc. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:



1.

The name of the corporation is Swisher Hygiene Inc.





2.

The date the dissolution was authorized was October 15, 2015.





3.

That the dissolution of the Corporation was duly authorized by the Board of Directors and the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with the provisions of Section 275(a) and (b) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





4.

That the names and addresses of the directors and officers of the Corporation are as follows:



 


	Directors	
 

	
 
	
 

	William M. Pierce                     	 c/o Akerman LLP
	
 
	Attn. Edward Ristaino, Esq.
	
 
	350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1600
	
 
	Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
	
 
	
 

	Richard L. Handley	c/o Akerman LLP
	
 
	Attn. Edward Ristaino, Esq.
	
 
	350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1600
	
 
	Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
	
 
	
 

	Joseph Burke                           	c/o Akerman LLP
	
 
	Attn. Edward Ristaino, Esq.
	
 
	350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1600
	
 
	Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
	
 
	
 

	William D. Pruitt                      	c/o Akerman LLP
	
 
	Attn. Edward Ristaino, Esq.
	
 
	350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1600
	
 
	Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
	
 
	
 

	David Prussky	c/o Akerman LLP
	
 
	Attn. Edward Ristaino, Esq.
	
 
	350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1600
	
 
	Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
	
 
	
 

	Officers	
 

	
 
	
 

	Richard L. Handley

	c/o Akerman LLP 
	Chief Executive Officer &	Attn. Edward Ristaino, Esq. 
	President	350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1600
	
 
	Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 
	
 
	
 

	Albert J. Detz                         	c/o Akerman LLP
	Chief Financial Officer,	Attn. Edward Ristaino, Esq.
	Secretary & Treasurer	350 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1600
	
 
	Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301







 


5.

The date of filing of the Corporation’s original certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is November 1, 2010.





6.

The effective time of this Certificate of Dissolution shall be 6:00 p.m. EDT on May 27, 2016.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Dissolution to be duly executed this 27th day of May, 2016.

 

 


	
 
	SWISHER HYGIENE INC.	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:     


	
/s/ Richard L. Handley
	
 

	
 
	Name:   

	
Richard L. Handley
	
 

	
 
	Title:   

	
Chief Executive Officer & President
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS  OF THE CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul Intlekofer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nutrition 21, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 14, 2005

/s/ Paul Intlekofer
------------------------
Paul Intlekofer
Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 29, 2010 

1026 

Order 

 

October 29, 2010 

141915 & (19) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141915 

 COA: 299213 

Eaton CC: 2010-020062-FC 

MARK SHAWN MORGAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2176

To reliquidate certain entries.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. THOMPSON (for himself and Mr. FRIST) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To reliquidate certain entries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CER4 TAIN ENTRIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514), or any other

7 provision of law, the Customs Service shall—

8 (1) not later than 90 days after receiving a re9 quest described in subsection (b), liquidate or reliq10 uidate the entries listed in subsection (c); and

11 (2) within 90 days after such liquidation or re12 liquidation, refund any duties paid with respect to
2

S 2176 IS

1 such entries in excess of the deposit rate, including

2 interest thereon.

3 (b) REQUESTS.—Reliquidation may be made under

4 subsection (a) with respect to an entry described in sub5 section (c) only if a request therefore is filed with the Cus6 toms Service within 90 days after the date of enactment

7 of this Act.

8 (c) ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in subsection

9 (a) are as follows:

Entry Number Date of Entry

W4442016446 .......................................................... August 20, 1997

W4442018301 .......................................................... January 23, 1998

W4442015653 .......................................................... July 1, 1997

W4442014334 .......................................................... March 28, 1997

W4442015240 .......................................................... May 20, 1997

W4442015232 .......................................................... May 20, 1997

W4442014797 .......................................................... April 28, 1997

W4442017196 .......................................................... October 13, 1997

Æ
#### William H. Schecker, Appellant, v. Edward J. Woolsey, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion

*Ter Curiam.*