alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 6, 2011 

t0829 

Order 

 

September 6, 2011 

143340 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143340 

 COA: 304702 

Oakland CC: 2011-236898-FH 

LEON JERMANE WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-OH1 (the "Exchange
     Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
     material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
     as Securities Administrator.

     Dated:    May 21, 2008

     /s/ Michelle Gill
     Michelle Gill, Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
## REA DDf<Es 5 

## ChtJ-j({fe _·
UJ-0 5e 

### ;..rc' ,' 2. if 57 3 

### -f!c-5 U4t-t?e**Jfo.~/6399** 

### -!lr--2**C!i~?t'** /Vr7,'**8~** 0 7-1/C-/ 

### FefJJf<_ltf9flt 

## I**~lo** 

# r S 3LI 1 oLO 

### 0 -Ol, 0'6J01**RECE~VED ~N**  COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FEB 2o 2015 

### f)e ttfl 

### c 0 rA.rl T 

# c Le r1 

# IS Abo! Aoo618, Cil!lk {J[tfffe" 

### C41Jtty Wlf' JftMe7)/fi5 54t>w-/[/ IJe!o.v

## ~ YL /fN/

## r-~-t71At4e fdoCeecf·":J-'"

## fevtl/1/~f,fr/cTl...e I)&O've**C{(JM.f~#'5**

. \ 

### T/1t?111k folt 

### FC/VL

### y~"-vt_**lf-J/e~~""r** 

### Tv /4r'7 t11dTk-V!
, S r 

### 'd t--ed 

### L 'f;



# . . . R #/()j 

# s I)!Jt/(> 

## JT TOCT:!Jo::rl-/ 

### 6Lf8o3 

### 7 jl{eW if()(}(les 5 "7 fe (_ (;rt_rJ Vt II I 'T 

## 3tl9?? 

## S7'#K}It.ytjg 

# New & s !oN;. 

### ny tf 

## s 

# 7S57o·
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

,.’ AUSTIN 
Honorable Bill 9. Vstkinr, we 2 

guodr, eta., th@stofore reoelved, by hot aheok. While it 10 

that Form 2 ObXUl#je8 a violation Of seation a of 

e or the rtatuts, ve do not uudertake to dvlrs the q-To* quallQ of proof’ neoerrary to 

rwtaln the allegation or intent to defraud.’ We nuke the 

88aO ob8enatias. tith referencle'to Farm 3 2'elatiQ-a t0 pPapel?tj 

hovered by a lien. 

I APPROVED !dA[Ay 31, 1941 

ATTOFiMEY GFXEFIAL 

very truly yours
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re:

PG&E CORPORATION

-andPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Debtors.

Case No, 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. §1111 (a). Transferee hereby gives notice 

pursuant to Rule 3001(e) (1), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this notice.

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

Name of Transferee

Address for all Communications/Notices:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

411 WEST PUTNAM AVE., SUITE 425

GREENWICH, CT 06830

ATTN: ALISA MUMOLA

Phone: 203-862-8211

Fax: 203-485-5910

Email: tradeclaimsgroup@contrariancapital.com

Address for all Payments/Distributions:

CONTRARIAN FUNDS, LLC

ATTN: 392426

500 ROSS ST 154-0455

PITTSBURGH, PA 15262

OPTIV SECURITY INC

Name of Transferor

Name and Current Address of Transferor:

OPTIV SECURITY INC

1125 17TH ST STE 1700

DENVER, CO 80202

ATTN: BILL CROUTCH

OPTIV SECURITY INC

6130 SPRINT PARKWAY, SUITE 400

OVERLAND PARK, KS 66211-1155

ATTN: BILL CROUTCH

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice

is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

By:_______/s/ Alisa Mumola_________

 Transferee/Transferee’s Agent

Date: May 15, 2019

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Schedule Amount Debtor Case No.

Schedule F $556,701 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 19-30089

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2005 Filed: 05/15/19 Entered: 05/15/19 12:08:45 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2005 Filed: 05/15/19 Entered: 05/15/19 12:08:45 Page 2 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2207 Filed: 05/23/19 Entered: 05/23/19 13:41:30 Page 1 of

2
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 2207 Filed: 05/23/19 Entered: 05/23/19 13:41:30 Page 2 of

2
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-307355) pertaining to the First Federal Savings 401(k) Plan
of our report dated February 20, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
statements of condition of Eagle BancGroup, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December
31, 1997 and its statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year then ended which are incorporated by reference in the 1997 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Eagle BancGroup, Inc.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Champaign, Illinois
March 30, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Footstar, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-20731, No. 333-30011 and No. 333-41390) on Form S-8 of Footstar, Inc. of our
report dated August 27, 2004, with respect to the Consolidated Balance Sheet of
Footstar, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies as of December 28, 2002 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive
income and cash flows for each of the years ended December 28, 2002 and December
29, 2001 and the related financial statement schedule (before the restatement to
reflect the discontinued operations), which report appears in the January 3,
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

Our report dated August 27, 2004, contains explanatory paragraphs that state
that:

      -     the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
            Accounting Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
            in fiscal 2002; and

      -     On March 2, 2004, the Company filed voluntary petitions for
            reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This
            filing for reorganization raises substantial doubt about the
            Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
            statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
            outcome of this uncertainty.

/S/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 8, 2005
**Exhibit10.46**

 

 

2005Short-term Incentive Plan Description

 

Under the Company’s short-term incentiveplan, annual cash bonuses are awarded taking into account an individual’s “targetbonus percentage” (a percentage of such participant’s base salary), individualperformance and the Company’s performance against established business and/orfinancial goals (corporate payout factor). Each of the named executive officers is a participant in the short-termincentive program.  For 2005, theCompensation Committee established (i) earnings before interest, taxes,depreciation and amortization and (ii) cash from operations less capitalexpenditures as the two financial performance measures under the program, eachof which is weighted equally.  Under theplan, a bonus equal to a multiple of the named executive officer’s target bonuspercentage will be paid depending on the level of performance achieved by theCompany with respect to the financial performance measures described above inaccordance with the following matrix:

 
| **Performance Measure**         | ** ** | **Corporate Payout Factor**          | ** ** |
|---------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|
| **EBITDA**                      | ** ** | **Cash  from Operations less CapEx** |       |   |
| Threshold 85% of Business  Plan |       | Threshold  55% of Business Plan      |       | 0% |   |
| Target 100% of Business  Plan   |       | Target  100% of Business Plan        |       | 100% |   |
| Maximum 110% of Business  Plan  |       | Maximum  135% of Business Plan       |       | 200% |   |

 

 

The bonus factor is interpolated betweenthreshold and target and target and maximum based on actual performance.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         933,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  391,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,304
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      23,579,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,977,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,361,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,977,817
<SALES>                                      1,587,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,598,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,180,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             429,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,113)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE BALANCE IS
$0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FILING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 4, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40346

Summary Calendar

 

ROBERT P. DIXON, JR.,

 PetitionerAppellant,

versus

SUZANNE HASTINGS, Warden,

 RespondentAppellee.

----------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CV-74-DF

----------------------------------------------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert P. Dixon, Jr., federal prisoner # 26529-034, is appealing the district court’s dismissal

of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition seeking to have disciplinary action expunged from his central

record. Dixon argues that he was denied due process in connection with disciplinary charges which
 

-2-

falsely accused himofmisconduct. He further argues that Officer Vanderbilt filed the charges against

him in retaliation for Dixon’s filing grievances against the officer.

To the extent that Dixon arguesthat he was denied due process because the Board of Prisons

(BOP) officials failed to comply with their own regulations regarding disciplinary proceedings, he

does not state a constitutional claim. See Jackson v. Cain, 864 F.2d 1235, 1251 (5th Cir. 1989).

Dixon’s loss of commissary privileges, cell restriction, placement in administrative

segregation, and extended work schedule were not atypical punishments requiring due process

protections. See Madison v. Parker, 104 F.3d 765, 767 (5th Cir. 1997); Malchi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d

953, 957-58 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Further, insofar as t he alleged lack of evidentiary basis for the charges, due process was satisfied

because there wassome evidence to support the disciplinary action taken. See Broussard v.Johnson,

253 F.3d 874, 876-77 (5th Cir. 2001). 

In connection with his claim of retaliation, Dixon is seeking a copy of Vanderbilt’s

employment record to show his pattern of retaliatory conduct. Even assuming that Dixon could use

the employment record to set aside the alleged retaliatorydisciplinaryactioncomplained about herein,

it would have no effect on the duration of his sentence because he did not lose any good time credits

as a result of this disciplinary action. Because Vanderbilt’s alleged acts of retaliation have not

extended the duration of Dixon’s sentence, he is not entitled to habeas relief on this claim. See

Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). 

The order of the district court dismissing the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition is

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4819 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4819

  To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to develop and submit class 
              life recommendations for depreciable assets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2014

   Mr. Murphy of Florida (for himself and Mr. Chabot) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to develop and submit class 
              life recommendations for depreciable assets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jobs Investment Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. CLASS LIFE RECOMMENDATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall, based on the 
monitoring and analysis of actual experience with respect to 
depreciable property under section 168(i)(1) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986, develop recommendations for prescribing to any 
depreciable property a class life, classification, or recovery period 
that more equitably provides for capital cost recovery across all 
industries without any significant effect on total tax revenue.
    (b) Proposal.--Not later than January 31, 2019, and every 5 years 
thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Ways and 
Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of 
the Senate the recommendations developed under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 176 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 08:59:11 Page 1 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 176 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 08:59:11 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 176 Filed: 01/31/19 Entered: 01/31/19 08:59:11 Page 3 of 3
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00004-CV

CLEAR CREEK ENERGY, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Kent SCHWARTZ and Daina SchwartzAppellees

Kent SCHWARTZ and Daina Schwartz,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-04-0253-CVA

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 26, 2013

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with each party bearing its own costs. 

Appellant’s counsel has certified that he has conferred with opposing counsel who does not oppose 

the motion. Accordingly, we grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). All costs of appeal 

are taxed against the party who incurred them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     The financial data schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from the form 10-Q of Howell Corporation for the quarter ended
     March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
     financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                        1874
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 10180
<ALLOWANCES>                  147
<INVENTORY>                   38
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              15868
<PP&E>                        437764
<DEPRECIATION>                277307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                207756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         32913
<BONDS>                       119200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   690
<COMMON>                      5465
<OTHER-SE>                    45505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  207756
<SALES>                       14267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              14267
<CGS>                         11909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 11909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              66118
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            2672
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (68379)
<INCOME-TAX>                  (23223)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (45156)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (45156)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (8.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (8.37)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,181
<SECURITIES>                                        92
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,519
<INVENTORY>                                     55,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,917
<PP&E>                                         453,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                 223,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 525,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,793
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,525
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   525,333
<SALES>                                        609,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               609,924
<CGS>                                          532,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  553,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,022)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 
333-31117 of Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-3 of our 
audit report dated February 28, 1997 (on the Company's financial statements for 
the year ended December 31, 1996) appearing in the Company's Annual Report on 
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the 
Prospectus, which is a part of the Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 23, 1999
#### John I. Lawrence and others, Executors, etc., Appellants, v. James M. Whitney and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion hy

Bradley, J.