alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## NCSC Report on How to Keep Court User Safe During Self-Help Services

Earlier this year, the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) released a report-style guide.  The purpose of this report is to provide facilities and access to justice recommendations for how courts can continue to offer in-person self-help services while respecting the public health and social distancing provisions required under COVID-19.

As confirmed cases continue to rise in states across the country, this resource may help courts maintain their efficiency, especially those which have slowly reopened or reintegrated self-directed services.

In addition to the report, there is also Tiny Chat #13 from Danielle Hirsch and Zach Zarnow, who are joined by NCSC Senior Architect and Facilities Planner Allie McKenzie to discuss six tips from the report further exploring this topic.

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Packeteer, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Dave Côté, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (Section 906) that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. Date: March 16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ DAVE CÔTÉDave CôtéPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,346,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,535,285
<PP&E>                                         231,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                 155,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,782,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          184,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,729
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,555,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,782,787
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               570,676
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,934,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               291,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,655,572
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,655,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.42)
        

</TABLE>
#### Francesca Stropoli, Appellant, v. Mendel Tamor and Others, Impleaded with Bankers’ Life Insurance Company of the City of New York and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-86,472-01

EX P ARTE JES SE L OUIS EDWARDS, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1216396-A IN THE 177th DIST RICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indece ncy with a child and se ntence d to four year s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his agre ed p l ea o f true to the State’s motion to adjudicate was involuntary beca

use he was misinformed by both trial counsel and the S tate reg arding the amount of time cre dit he would rec eive in orde r to rec eive a “time serve d” sente nce. The trial court, in ag ree ment with the State, has deter mined that Applicant was misinformed2

by trial counsel and by the prosec utor that he had acc umulated 1,438 day s o f p re -sentenc e cre dit when he in fac t had only acc umulated 1, 2 26 day s at the time of his stipulation to the motion to adjudicate in this cause . The trial court further deter mined that Applicant relied up o n this misinformation in deter

mining whether h e would acc ept the State’s plea offe r of four y ear s’ imprisonment in exchang e for his plea of true. Applicant is entitled to relief
. Ex parte Huerta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 1216396 in the 177th District Court of Har ris County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Har ris County to
answe r the char g es as set out in the motion to adjudica te. The tria l court shall issue any nece ssary bench w arr ant within 10 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment o f Crim in a l Ju s ti c e
– Co r rec tional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Marc h 22, 2017 Do not publish
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE )

ASSOCIATION, a foreign corporation, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4661

)

ROBYN L. REY, )

)

Respondent. )

)

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the

Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; 

Elizabeth G. Rice, Judge.

Jenna C. Worden, Daniel A. Martinez, 

and Weslee L. Ferron of Martinez Denbo, 

L.L.C., St. Petersburg, for Petitioner.

George A. Vaka of Vaka Law Group,

Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed without prejudice to United 

Services Automobile Association to seek review in this court of any ruling on the motion 

to abate that is pending in the circuit court or on any discovery order that is entered in 
- 2 -

regard to the bad faith claim prior to the finality of the final judgment on which the bad 

faith claim is based.

Dismissed.

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

#### 					NEWS				

## New Resource Available on the National Symposium on Court Management

# 

The 4th National Symposium on Court Management, held at the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) in October 2010, convened a range of state court stakeholders for only the 4th time since 1981. Participation at this symposium was by invitation only; however, the NCSC has recently made the resources from this event available to the entire state court community through a website titled, *Readings from the 4th National Symposium on Court Management*. The website includes the symposium program, videos, materials, and a summary of the results from a recent survey on the well-being and growth of state courts.

#### LATEST NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

                  -  Sixteen State Courts Participate in Groundbreaking Workshop for Racial Justice Education  Read More**   
                  -  New Resource: The Rural Justice Collaborative Digest for June 2024  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Board Awards FY 2024 Third Quarter Grants  Read More**   
                  -  SJI Executive Director, Jonathan Mattiello, Congressional Briefing Panelist on Capitol Hill  Read More**   

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Netsmart Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-91907) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-96015) of our report dated February 3,
2003 on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of
December 31, 2002, and for the year then ended which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/*
----------------------
Marcum & Kliegman LLP

Woodbury, New York
June 17, 2003

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in these Registration Statements of
Netsmart Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-3 (File No. 333-91907) and
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-96015 and 333-101474) of our report dated February 15,
2002 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of
December 31, 2001, and for each of the years in the two year period ended
December 31, 2001, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition, we consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in
the Registration Statements.

/s/*

----------------
Eisner LLP

New York, New York
June 16, 2003
DD Form 2535 - https://www.socom.mil/Documents/DD2535_2023.pdf

Block 1.d – Put an X in the other block and write in the date of the event 

Block 1.e – Put an X in the other block and write in Para-Commandos 

Block 2,a-c – Self Explanatory

Block 2, d-g – Disregard 

Block 3a-e – Self Explanatory

Block 3 d – MUST BE SIGNED by someone with authority to allow us to jump on that property 

Blocks 4-14 – Self Explanatory and MUST be filled out

Blocks 15-16 - SKIP

Block 17 - Write PER Para-Commando Instructions, this portion skipped as the Para-Commandos fill out 

a separate form and send to the FAA

Block 18 – SKIP

Block 19 – write a short blurb on how the Para-Commandos Performance will enhance your event 

Block 20a–g – Must be fill out. In Block g, write which charities any excess funds will support

Block 21, a-c – fill out. If the Para-Commandos have performed there previously, note that in b & c 

Block 22, a-j – Must be initialed even though most no longer apply

Block 23, a-c – Must be filled out and block a MUST be Signed!

Print and scan form and email to Para-Commandos@socom.mil – call 813 826 7714 if you haven’t 

received a response with 3-5 business days.
<html><head><title>Request Rejected</title>
<style>
html {
        font-size: 14px;
        font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif;
}
.content {
        max-width: 600px;
        margin: auto;
        position: absolute;
        top:0;
        bottom: 0;
        left: 0;
        right: 0;
        text-align:center;
        padding-top: 5%;
}
.branding a {text-decoration: none; color: #444;}
.branding a:hover {color: #000;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="content">
<div class=logo">
<img src="https://logo.si.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/logo_seal.svg" /></div>
<div class="branding">
<h2>Please contact the OCIO Help Desk for additional support. </h2>
<h3>Your issue ID is: 1886394443200142253</h3>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>
Lieutenant General Francis L. Donovan

Vice Commander

U.S. Special Operations Command

Lieutenant General Frank Donovan currently serves 

as Vice Commander, United States Special 

Operations Command. An infantry, reconnaissance,

and special operations officer, Lieutenant General 

Donovan has led Marines and Sailors in all three 

Marine Expeditionary Forces to include 

commanding a Force Reconnaissance Platoon, 

Battalion Landing Team, Marine Expeditionary Unit, 

Marine Expeditionary Brigade, and a Marine 

Division. He also commanded a Naval Task Force in 

5th Fleet (CTF 51) and 6th Fleet (CTF 61). He has 

served in combat, contingency, and expeditionary 

operations at sea, from the sea, and ashore.

Other command assignments include a Marine Corps Security Forces Detachment in 

Crete, Greece; a Fleet Anti-Terrorism Security Team (FAST) platoon; and a Recruiting 

Station in Eastern Pennsylvania. He also was Officer in Charge of a Special Operations 

Training Group; Executive Officer for Marine Corps Special Operations Command, 

Detachment One; and Director of the Expeditionary Warfare School. 

Joint tours include service as the J35, United States Special Operations Command;

Branch Chief, Joint Staff, J-5 Trans-regional Threats Coordination Center (T2C2); and 

Assisting Commanding General, Joint Special Operations Command. 

Lieutenant General Donovan holds a Bachelor of Arts in Geography from Towson 

University, a Master of Military Studies from the Marine Corps Command and Staff 

College, a Master of Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College. He completed 

the Advanced Management Program (AMP) at Harvard Business School. Lieutenant 

General Donovan and his wife Kim, a former Navy officer, have two children who are 

both active-duty U.S. Marines.
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 1 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 2 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 3 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 4 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 5 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 6 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 7 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 8 of

9
Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1693 Filed: 04/25/19 Entered: 04/25/19 11:31:48 Page 9 of

9
13

Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1986    Filed: 05/13/19    Entered: 05/13/19 11:43:32    Page 1 of1
#### John Gray and Robert J. Gray, Respondents, *v.*The Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Appellant.

*Unliquidated da/mages*— *interest thereon, when not alloioable.*

Where damages are unliquidated and the party in default has no means of ascertaining the amount of damages to which the other party is entitled, so that he may tender the same, interest upon the amount of damages is not allowable.

Appeal by the defendant, The Central Eailroad Company of New Jersey, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of March, 1895, upon the verdict of a jury rendered after a trial at the New York Circuit, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 20th day of 'March, *4781895, denying tlie defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

*Robert Thorne*and *Robert W. De Forest,*for the appellant.

*Jacob F. Miller,*for the respondents.

Van Brunt, P. J.:

It does not seem necessary to discuss the question involving the right of the plaintiffs to the benefit of the' verdict rendered.

There are no exceptions to the admission or exclusion of evidence which require special mention. The learned court, however, seems to have erred in charging the jury that if they found for the plaintiffs they should allow interest.

It seems to be the rule in this State that where the damages are unli-quidated and the party in default has no means of ascertaining the amount of damages to which the other party is entitled, so that he may tender the same, interest upon the amount of damages is not allowable. *(Mansfield*v. *N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.,*114 N. Y. 331; *McMaster*v. *State of New York,*108 id. 542; *White*v. *Miller,*78 id. 396.)

In the latter case the question is examined at length, and the foregoing seems to be the conclusion arrived at.

In *Mansfield*v. *N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. (supra)*the court lays down the rule that in an action to recover damages for breach of contract, unless the means are accessible to the party to be charged of ascertaining by computation or otherwise the amount to which the plaintiff is entitled, the plaintiff should not be allowed interest on the amount of the damages found and the submission of the question as to such allowance to the jury is error.

The judgment should be modified by reducing the judgment to the sum of $2,500, the amount of the verdict, with interest thereon from the date of its rendition to the entry of the judgment, and, as modified,, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party.

Follett and Parker, JJ., concurred.

Judgment modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1227** 

MICHAEL A. SCOTT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION; KENNETH E. WILLIAM; STEVEN G. JACKSON; ELIAS I. VEGA , Defendants

- Appellees
.

**No. 16**  **- 122**  **8**

MICHAEL A. SCOTT , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,
v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION , Defendant

- Appellee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:95

- cv - 00377

- RBS; 2:95

- cv - 00815

- RBS )

Submitted : July 19, 2016 Decided: July 27, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael A. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Johnson Webster, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia; Roy Barrow Blackwell, Hunter Wilmer Sims, Jr., KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: In these conso lidated appeals, Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We grant Scott’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and affirm f or the reasons cited by the district
court. Scott v. Norfolk S. Corp. , No. 2:95

- cv - 00377

- RBS; 2:95

-

cv - 00815

- RBS (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2016; Feb. 22 , 2016). We deny the Appellee s ’ motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Constance B. Moore hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of BRE Properties, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BRE Properties, Inc.



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                                                         
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 18, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Constance B. Moore                               
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | Constance B. Moore President and Chief Executive
Officer