alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Shawn M. Conroy Blom, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Chalone WineGroup, Ltd.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation: and;
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Dated: November 12, 2004              /s/ Shawn M. Conroy Blom   Shawn M. Conroy Blom   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF PHOENIX MEDICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INC., FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 2, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,678,749<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,224,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,904,261
<PP&E>                                       4,541,440<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,445,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,238,183
<BONDS>                                      5,792,762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       245,962
<OTHER-SE>                                    (831,206)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,445,701
<SALES>                                      5,635,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,989
<CGS>                                        5,140,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,140,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               676,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             300,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (261,249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (261,249)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.11)
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS NET AMOUNT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7105
SHERWOOD FARROW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EDDIE PEARSON, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1002-R) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherwood Farrow, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Farrow v. Pearson , No. CA-96-1002-R (W.D. Va. July 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
REA DDf<Es 5 ChtJ-j({fe _· 

UJ-0 5e ;..rc' ,' 2. if 57 3 -f!c-5 

U4t-t?e Jfo.~/6399 -!lr--2 

C!i~?t' /Vr7,' 8~ 0 7-1/C-/ 

FefJJf<_ltf9flt I ~lo r S 

3LI 1 oLO 0 -Ol, 0'6J01 

RECE~VED ~N COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

FEB 2o 2015 

f)e ttfl c 0 rA.rl T c Le r1 IS Abo! Aoo618, Cil!lk 

{J[tfffe" C41Jtty Wlf' JftMe7)/fi5 54t>w-/[/ IJe!o.v 

~ YL /fN/ r-~-t71At4e fdoCeecf·":J-'" fevtl/1/~f,fr/cTl...e I)&O've C{(JM.f~#'5 . \ 

T/1t?111k folt FC/VL y~"-vt_ lf-J/e~~""r Tv /4r'7 

t11dTk-V! , 

S r 'd t--ed L 'f; 

. . . R #/()j s I)!Jt/(> JT 

TOCT:!Jo::rl-/ 6Lf8o3 7 

jl{eW if()(}(les 5 "7 fe (_ (;rt_rJ Vt II I 'T 

3tl9?? S7'#K}It.ytjg 

New & s !oN;. ny tf s 

7S57o·
# Republican Party Whips

**

----

*Advanced to Republican party floor leader.

1  No Republican whips were appointed from 1935 to 1944 since only 17 Republicans were in the Senate following the landslide election of President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936. Accordingly, the minutes of the Republican Conference for the period state: "On motion of Senator Hastings, duly seconded and carried, it was agreed that no Assistant Leader or Whip be elected but that the chairman be authorized to appoint Senators from time to time to assist him in taking charge of the interests of the minority." A note attached to the conference minutes added: "The chairman of the conference, Senator McNary, apparently appointed Senator Austin of Vermont as assistant leader in 1943 and 1944, until the conference adopted Rules of Organization."

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Related Link 

About Parties and Leadership

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
Exhibit 31.2I, Javed Latif, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of En Pointe Technologies, Inc. (the“Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: December 23, 2005/s/ Javed LatifJaved Latif, Vice President and
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2506

To amend title 46, United States Code, with respect to the Federal preemption of State law concerning the regulation of marine and ocean navigation, safety, and transportation by States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 4, 2000

Mr. GORTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend title 46, United States Code, with respect to

the Federal preemption of State law concerning the regulation of marine and ocean navigation, safety, and transportation by States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STANDARDS.

4 Section 3703 of title 46, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end thereof the following:

6 ‘‘(d) PRESERVATION OF STATE AUTHORITY.—Noth7 ing in this chapter, or any other provision of law, preempts

8 the authority of a State to adopt additional standards re-
2

S 2506 IS

1 garding maintenance, operation, equipping, personnel

2 qualification, or manning of vessels to which the regula3 tions under subsection (a) apply.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2013 (the  "Report") I, Andrew Van
Noy, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 USC Section  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



 Date: May 14, 2013

                                   By: \s\ Andrew Van Noy
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Andrew Van Noy, Chief Executive Officer
                                   and President
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. EARNINGS
PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN RESTATED TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SFAS
128, EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                           9,678
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,138
<INVENTORY>                                    469,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               609,534
<PP&E>                                       1,159,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                 286,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,621,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          291,615
<BONDS>                                        652,391
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           634
<OTHER-SE>                                     526,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,621,419
<SALES>                                        975,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               975,120
<CGS>                                          705,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  949,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (196)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,352
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,917)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08 <F2>
                                   
<FN>
<F1> Represents basic earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
earnings per share. 
<F2> Represents diluted earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, 
earnings per share.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### Margaret J. Loos v. Annie Leahy, Impleaded, etc.

Motion, denied, with ten dollars costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-01-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                               248,564
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      2,926,460
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                          518,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   4,043,896
<PP&E>                               974,449
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     5,524,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              3,191,936
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                           8,308,446
<OTHER-SE>                        (6,268,145)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       5,524,496
<SALES>                            9,602,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   9,602,882
<CGS>                              4,284,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      4,284,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   6,559,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   129,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,369,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,369,938)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,369,938)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.27)



</TABLE>
##### 



(dollars in thousands)
 2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Income from continuing operations before minority interests and income tax
    
    $
    24,488
    
    
    $
    189,686
    
    
    $
    57,323
    
    
    $
    88,216
    
    
    $
    13,526Distributions received in excess of earnings from unconsolidated companies
    
    
    10,050
    
    
    
    191
    
    
    
    1,750
    
    
    
    13,161
    
    
    
    15,364Equity in
losses from unconsolidated company with guaranteed debt
    
    
    (723
    )
    
    
    (1,676
    )
    
    
    (2,979
    )
    
    
    (641
    )
    
    
    Interest Expense
    
    
    136,664
    
    
    
    176,771
    
    
    
    172,116
    
    
    
    178,956
    
    
    
    182,194Amortization of Capitalized Interest
    
    
    16,417
    
    
    
    8,433
    
    
    
    5,600
    
    
    
    5,371
    
    
    
    Portion of rent expense representative of interest
    
    
    699
    
    
    
    965
    
    
    
    1,126
    
    
    
    1,319
    
    
    
    1,485Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs
    
    
    8,108
    
    
    
    13,056
    
    
    
    11,053
    
    
    
    10,265
    
    
    
    9,327Earnings
    
    $
    195,703
    
    
    $
    387,426
    
    
    $
    245,989
    
    
    $
    296,647
    
    
    $
    221,896Interest Expense
    
    $
    136,969
    (1)
    
    $
    176,993
    (1)
    
    $
    172,351
    (1)
    
    $
    178,976
    
    
    $
    182,194Capitalized Interest
    
    
    21,194
    
    
    
    15,850
    
    
    
    18,267
    
    
    
    16,984
    
    
    
    1,320Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs
    
    
    8,108
    
    
    
    13,056
    
    
    
    11,053
    
    
    
    10,265
    
    
    
    9,327GMAC Preferred Dividend
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5,723
    
    
    
    19,015Portion of rent expense representative of interest
    
    
    699
    
    
    
    965
    
    
    
    1,126
    
    
    
    1,319
    
    
    
    1,485Fixed Charges
    
    $
    166,970
    
    
    $
    206,864
    
    
    $
    202,797
    
    
    $
    213,267
    
    
    $
    213,341Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.87
    
    
    
    1.21
    
    
    
    1.39
    
    
    
    1.04
 (1)
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2240

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain polyamides.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9, 2000

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain polyamides.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MICRO-POROUS ULTRA FINE SPHERICAL

4 FORMS OF POLYAMIDES 6, 12, AND 6/12.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:
2

•S 2240 IS

‘‘ 9902.32.00 Micro-Porous

Ultra Fine

Spherical Forms

of Polyamides 6,

12, and 6/12

(CAS No.

25038–54–4,

CAS No. 25038–

74–8, and CAS

No. 25191–04–

2) (provided for

in subheading

3908.10) ............ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ