alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2602 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2602

To provide for the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to fund, 
 on a 1-year emergency basis, certain requests for grant renewal under 
the programs for permanent supportive housing and shelter-plus-care for 
                           homeless persons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2000

Ms. Snowe (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to fund, 
 on a 1-year emergency basis, certain requests for grant renewal under 
the programs for permanent supportive housing and shelter-plus-care for 
                           homeless persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY FUNDING OF RENEWAL REQUESTS FOR HOMELESS HOUSING 
              GRANTS.

    (a) Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, from 
any amounts made available for fiscal year 2000 for assistance under 
section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f) 
that are unobligated as of the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall, for each request 
described in subsection (b), make a 1-year grant to the entity making 
the request in the amount under subsection (c).
    (b) Eligible Renewal Requests.--A request described in this 
subsection is a request for a grant under subtitle C of title IV of the 
Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11381 et seq.) 
for permanent housing for homeless persons with disabilities or 
subtitle F of such title (42 U.S.C. 11403 et seq.) that--
            (1) was submitted in accordance with the eligibility 
        requirements established by the Secretary and pursuant to the 
        notice of funding availability for fiscal year 1999 covering 
        such programs, but was not approved;
            (2) was made by an entity that received such a grant 
        pursuant to the notice of funding availability for a previous 
        fiscal year; and
            (3) requested renewal of funding made under such previous 
        grant for use for eligible activities because funding under 
        such previous grant expires during calendar year 2000.
    (c) Grant Amount.--The amount under this subsection is the amount 
necessary, as determined by the Secretary, to renew funding for the 
eligible activities under the grant request for a period of only 1 
year, taking into consideration the amount of funding requested for the 
first year of funding under the grant request.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of MacroChem Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)       Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
         2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Form
         10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                           /s/ Bernard R. Patriacca
                           ------------------------------------
                           Bernard R. Patriacca
                           Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Dated:  August 16, 2004
        ---------------


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MacroChem Corporation and will be retained by MacroChem Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       33
exhibit10_2.htm


    


    


    


    Ready
Welder Corporation

    1891
N. Gaffey Street, Suite A

    San
Pedro, CA 90731

    Phone:
310-832-2541

    


    Promissory
Note

    


    Date:
December 31, 2006

    


    Amount:
$2,160,918.78

    


    For
value received, on demand, or no later than December 31, 2007, Ready Welder
Corporation promises to pay to the order of Theodore Holstein MD, as trustee of
Holstein family trust, dated August 1976, a California revocable trust, at 2259
Warmouth Street, San Pedro, California 90732, or at such other place as shall be
designated by lender in writing, in United States currency, the principal amount
of Two Million, One Hundred and Sixty Thousand, Nine Hundred Eighteen Dollars
and 78 cents ($2,160,918.78) with interest accrued from December 31, 2006 at the
rate of 8% per annum.

    


    Note:  This
Promissory Note is a consolidation of the net un-reimbursed value of all
previous Promissory Notes outstanding, and any unpaid interest accrued on those
notes, as of December 31, 2006 less any payments made against those notes and
accrued interest paid prior to and including December 31, 2006.

    


    Lender:_______/s/_________________                                                                                                ______12/31/06______________

                Theodore
Holstein, MD,
CEO                                                                                                Date

    


    Witness:______/s/__________________                                                                                                ______12/31/06_______________

                  Esperanza
Sanchez                                                                                                              
Date
**EXHIBIT 24.1**

 

February 22, 2005

 

 
| M. Michele Burns            |   | Daniel Streek               |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| 1155 Perimeter Center  West |   | 1155 Perimeter Center  West |
| Atlanta, Georgia 30338      |   | Atlanta, Georgia 30338      |

 

Dear Ms. Burns and Mr.Streek:

 

Mirant Corporation (the “Company”)proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2004.

 

The Company and theundersigned directors and officers of the Company, individually as a director and/oras an officer of the Company, hereby make, constitute and appointM. Michele Burns and Daniel Streek our true and lawful Attorneys for eachof us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to be filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the foregoingsaid Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any appropriate amendment or amendmentsthereto and any necessary exhibits.

 
|   | Yours very truly,  |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |               |
|   | MIRANT CORPORATION |
|   |               |
|   |               |
|   | By                 | /s/ Marce Fuller |   |
|   |               | S. Marce Fuller |
|   |               | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |               |

 

----

 
|   | By     | /s/ A. D. Correll        |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | A. D. Correll            |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   | By     | /s/ A. W. Dahlberg       |   |
|   |   | A.  W. Dahlberg     |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   |                     |
|   | By     | /s/ Stuart E. Eizenstat  |   |
|   |   | Stuart E. Eizenstat      |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   |                     |
|   | By     | /s/ David J. Lesar       |   |
|   |   | David J. Lesar           |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   |                     |
|   | By     | /s/ Robert F. McCullough |   |
|   |   | Robert F. McCullough     |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   |                     |
|   | By     | /s/ James F. McDonald    |   |
|   |   | James F. McDonald        |
|   |   |                     |
|   |   |                     |
|   | By     | /s/ Ray M. Robinson      |   |
|   |   | Ray M. Robinson          |

 

----
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 16, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-15073 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cv-01934-GAP-GJK

JOSUE SALAZAR, 

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CITY OF PALM BAY, et al.,

Defendants,

FRANK WALTERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(April 16, 2012)
Before HULL, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Officer Frank Walters of the City of Palm Bay Police Department appeals

the denial of qualified immunity against Josue Salazar’s complaint of false arrest. 

42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court ruled that genuine issues of material fact

barred summary judgment. We affirm.

Salazar complained that Walters lacked probable cause to arrest him for

delivering drug paraphernalia. Salazar alleged that Walters arrested him after

Walters observed various liquid fertilizers in the open bed of Salazar’s truck. 

Walters moved for summary judgment on the ground that he had observed in the

bed of Salazar’s truck “equipment” and brands of fertilizers, like “Sensi Grow”

and Sensizym,” used commonly to cultivate marijuana.

The district court did not err when it ruled that Walters was not entitled to

summary judgment based on qualified immunity. To be guilty of delivering drug

paraphernalia, a person must “deliver [or] possess with intent to deliver . . . drug

paraphernalia, knowing, or under circumstances where [he] reasonably should

know, that it will be used . . .[t]o plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest,

manufacture, . . . produce, process, prepare, . . . or conceal a controlled substance.” 

Fla. Stat. § 893.147(2)(a). The record reveals genuine issues of material fact about

2
whether Walters had arguable probable cause to arrest Salazar for transporting

fertilizer — an otherwise legal substance — for an illegal purpose. In a

supplemental report about the arrest, Walters stated that he had observed in the

bed of Salazar’s truck “several gallons of liquid chemicals, boxes of powder

chemicals, and electronic devices” that were “known to [him] through [his]

training and experience as items typically used for illegal hydroponic marijuana

cultivation operations.” One of Salazar’s passengers, Roberto Marquez, testified

that he had observed “a couple [of] boxes” of fertilizer in the bed of truck and

“some of them had said right on the box” what they contained. Salazar testified

that the bed of his truck contained only “bottles and bottles” of liquid fertilizer. If

we accept Salazar’s testimony as true, which we must, at this stage, a reasonable

jury could find that Walters violated Salazar’s right under the Fourth Amendment

not to be arrested without probable cause. 

The denial of Walters’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified

immunity is AFFIRMED.

3
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-19-0000877

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES TUNG MING YUEN, Defendant-Appellant

A PPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT H ONOLULU DIVISION (CASE NO. 1DTA-18-03510)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon review of the record in CAAP-19-0000877, it appears this court lacks appellate jurisdiction because no final judgment was entered by the District Court.

Defendant-Appellant Charles Tung Ming Yuen (Appellant) appeals from the December 11, 2019 Notice of Entry of Judgment and/or Order and Plea/Judgment (Judgment).

On December 11, 2019, the Judgment was entered which found Appellant guilty of Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an Intoxicant, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291E-61 (Supp. 2018). However, there are notations on the document stating "Referred to: restitution + ability to pay studies" and "HEARING on rest 2/11/20." The December 11, 2019 Court Minutes also state "(Hrg on Restitution 2/11/20 10D-AM)." Thus, the issue of restitution was not adjudicated. "Appeals upon the record shall be allowed from all final decisions and Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000877 04-DEC-2020 09:20 AM Dkt. 34 ODSLJN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### final judgments of district courts in all criminal matters." HRS § 641-12 (2016).

Judgments of conviction entered in the district courts may not be appealed unless they are final. Judgments of conviction are not final unless they include the final adjudication and the final sentence. In the instant case, the sentence imposed was not the final sentence because the district court expressly left open the possibility that its sentence of [Appellant] might include an order requiring [Appellant] to pay restitution. The court did not finally decide whether it would order [Appellant] to pay restitution and, if so, in what amount. Consequently, the [] Judgment is not final and, because it is not final, it is not appealable. 

### State v. Kilborn, 109 Hawai # i 435, 442, 127 P.3d 95, 102 (App. 2005).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, December 4, 2020.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

2
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>David Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from an order of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered December 17, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender on each of two separate cases pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law Art. 6-C).</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered December 17, 2014, affirmed.</p><p>Since defendant did not ask the SORA court for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level, that claim is unpreserved (<i>see People v Gillotti</i>, 23 NY3d 841, 861 n 5 [2014]; <i>People v Sanchez, </i>102 AD3d 479 [2013], <i>lv denied </i>21 NY3d 852 [2013]). In any event, there is no basis in the record for such a departure, particularly in light of the seriousness of the underlying offenses committed against three individuals, one of whom was a fourteen year-old girl, and defendant's recent postrelease arrest and indictment on sexual abuse charges (<i>see People v Callaghan</i>, 56 AD3d 363 [2008], <i>lv denied </i>12 NY3d 702 [2009]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: October 13, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited  financial  statements of Liberty Housing Partners Limited Partnership
at and for the period  ended March 31, 1999 and is  qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         55,082
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  163,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,340
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,277,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,330,215
<BONDS>                                        1,037,683
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (13,090,608)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,277,290
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               28,592
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               31,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             748,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (751,890)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (34.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit (10)H

                              FNB CORPORATION

                    NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

                   Effective May 9, 2006 to May 8, 2007


                            Cash Committee    Unrestricted        Total
                  Cash        Meeting Fee      Stock Award    Consideration
                (Monthly)      (Monthly)        (Annually)      (Annually)

Director(1)      $1,000           $300           $12,000         $26,400 to
                                                                 $27,000

Committee Chair  $1,000           $375           $12,000         $26,700 to
                                                                 $27,300

Chair            $2,500            --            $12,000         $42,000


Cash:  Non-employee directors of FNB Corporation (the "Corporation") receive
monthly cash compensation of $1,000.  The Chair of the Corporation's Board of
Directors (the "Board") receives additional monthly cash compensation of
$1,500, for total cash compensation of $2,500 per month.

Cash Committee Meeting Fee:  With the exception of the Board Chair who is not
compensated for attending Board Committee ("Committee") meetings, non-
employee directors of the Corporation receive $300 for each Committee meeting
attended.  Committee chairs receive $375 for each meeting attended of any
Committee they chair.  Committee meeting fees are paid monthly.

Stock Award:  All non-employee directors, including the Chair, receive an
annual award of approximately $12,000 in unrestricted common stock.  On May
25, 2006, pursuant to Article 10 of the FNB Corporation 2006 Incentive Stock
Plan, each non-employee director was granted 357 unrestricted shares of the
Corporation's common stock valued at $33.62 per share, the fair market value
of the stock on the date of grant.

Total Annual Consideration:  The range of total annual consideration for a
non-employee director is based on attendance at eight to ten Committee
meetings per year.  The range of total annual consideration for a Committee
chair includes four Committee meetings attended as Committee chair.

On occasion, non-employee directors may also receive additional grants of
equity as provided for under the FNB Corporation 2006 Incentive Stock Plan.
No additional grants of equity were awarded to non-employee directors in
2006.
<PAGE>

(1) The First National Bank affiliate (the "Bank") board chair, who also
serves as a Corporation director, receives monthly cash compensation of
$2,000 and $300 per Corporation Board committee meeting attended, but does
not receive a fee for Bank board committee meeting attendance.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 97 (Thursday, May 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 12181 and <greek-i> 12182]


South Dakota Disaster <greek-i> SD-00031

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South Dakota 
(FEMA--1915--DR), dated 05/13/2010.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/10/2010 And Continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/13/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/12/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/14/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 05/13/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Aurora, Beadle, Brown, Brule, Buffalo, Charles Mix, 
Clark, Clay, Codington, Day, Edmunds, Faulk, Grant, Hamlin, Hanson, 
Hutchinson, Hyde, Jerauld, Kingsbury, Lyman, Marshall, Mccook, 
Mcpherson, Miner, Roberts, Sanborn, Spink, Sully, Turner, Union.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere..     3.625
    Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available              3.000
     Elsewhere................................................
For Economic Injury:
    Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available              3.000
     Elsewhere................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 121816 
and for economic injury is 121826.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-12077 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P