[Cite as Vintilescu v. Schaffner, 2017-Ohio-924.]

STATE OF OHIO, BELMONT COUNTY 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

SEVENTH DISTRICT 

NICOLAE VINTILESCU, Trustee of the 

Vintilescu Family Trust, et al. 

 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES 

VS. 

DAVID K. SCHAFFNER, et al. 

 DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 15 BE 0002 

OPINION 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Civil Appeal from the Court of Common 

Pleas of Belmont County, Ohio 

Case No. 13 CV 385 

JUDGMENT: Reversed and Remanded. 

APPEARANCES: 

For Plaintiffs-Appellees Attorney John Estadt 

Attorney Kyle Bickford 

46457 National Road West 

St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950 

For Defendants-Appellants Attorney David Schaffner 

132 Fair Avenue, N.W. 

New Philadelphia, Ohio 44663 

JUDGES: 

Hon. Mary DeGenaro 

Hon. Gene Donofrio 

Hon. Carol Ann Robb 

 

 

 Dated: March 13, 2017 
[Cite as Vintilescu v. Schaffner, 2017-Ohio-924.]

DeGENARO, J. 

{¶1} Defendants-Appellants, David K. Schaffner, et al., appeal the trial 

court's decision to apply the 1989 version of R.C. 5301.56, Ohio's Dormant Mineral 

Act, and thereby granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees, Nicolae 

Vintilescu, Trustee of the Vintilescu Family Trust, et al. 

{¶2} It was error for the trial court to resolve this action by applying the 1989 

version of R.C. 5301.56 as the Ohio Supreme Court recently held the 2006 version 

controls. Accordingly, the trial court's judgment is reversed and the case remanded 

for the trial court to apply the 2006 version of R.C. 5301.56, pursuant to the Ohio 

Supreme Court's recent rulings regarding the DMA. 

{¶3} Appellees are the surface owners of certain real property in Belmont 

County. On October 21, 2013, Appellees filed a complaint against Appellants for, 

inter alia, quiet title. Underlying their claims was Appellees' assertion that R.C. 

5301.56 operated to extinguish Appellants' severed mineral interests in that real 

property. Appellants filed an answer and counterclaim. Appellees filed a Civ.R. 12(C) 

motion for judgment on the pleadings. One of the disputed issues was whether the 

1989 or 2006 version of R.C. 5301.56 controlled. 

{¶4} On December 18, 2014, the trial court granted Appellees' motion for 

judgment on the pleadings; in doing so it applied the 1989 version only and 

dismissed Appellants' counterclaim. This appeal had been stayed on February 9, 

2015 pending the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in multiple cases regarding, inter 

alia, whether the 1989 or the 2006 version of R.C. 5301.56 controls. 

{¶5} In Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., Slip Opinion No. 2016-

Ohio-5796 (Sept. 15, 2016), ¶ 2, the Court held "the 2006 version of the Dormant 

Mineral Act, which is codified at R.C. 5301.56, applies to all claims asserted after 

June 30, 2006[.]" On October 11, 2016, this case was returned to the active docket. 

{¶6} Appellants assert the following assignments of error: 

The trial court erred in applying the 1989 version of the Ohio Dormant 

Mineral Act to the subject case. 
- 2 - 

The trial court erred in determining that the 1989 Dormant Mineral Act 

"automatically" vested the mineral interest in the surface owners. 

{¶7} In Corban, the Ohio Supreme Court held the 2006 version of R.C. 

5301.56 controlled, reasoning in pertinent part: 

In accord with this analysis, we conclude that the 1989 law was 

not self-executing and did not automatically transfer ownership of 

dormant mineral rights by operation of law. Rather, a surface holder 

seeking to merge those rights with the surface estate under the 1989 

law was required to commence a quiet title action seeking a decree that 

the dormant mineral interest was deemed abandoned. 

* * * 

Dormant mineral interests did not automatically pass by 

operation of law to the surface owner pursuant to the 1989 law. Thus, 

as of June 30, 2006, any surface holder seeking to claim dormant 

mineral rights and merge them with the surface estate is required to 

follow the statutory notice and recording procedures enacted in 2006 by 

H.B. 288. These procedures govern the manner by which mineral rights 

are deemed abandoned and vested in the surface holder and apply 

equally to claims that the mineral interests were abandoned prior to 

June 30, 2006. 

Id. at ¶ 28, 31. 

{¶8} This case was filed with the trial court well after June 30, 2006. 

Granting judgment on the pleadings, the trial court only discussed and relied upon 

facts within the 20 years prior to the effective date of the 1989 version, or within the 

three-year statutory grace period ending March 22, 1992, and applied its 

interpretation of the 1989 version of R.C. 5301.56 to those facts. There was no 

discussion of the law or the facts relative to the 2006 version of R.C. 5301.56 by the 
- 3 - 

trial court. 

{¶9} That Appellees brought their complaint under the 1989 version does not 

change the outcome. In Albanese v. Batman, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5814, ¶ 16-

22 (Sept. 15, 2016), the Ohio Supreme Court concluded the 2006 version of R.C. 

5301.56 applied, notwithstanding that plaintiffs' claims were originally framed under 

the 1989 version. 

{¶10} Pursuant to Corban, the trial court erred by applying the 1989 version of 

R.C. 5301.56 and granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of Appellees on that 

basis. Accordingly, Appellants' assignments of error are meritorious. The judgment of 

the trial court is reversed, Appellants' counterclaim is reinstated, and the case is 

remanded in order for the trial court to apply the 2006 version of R.C. 5301.56, 

pursuant to the Ohio Supreme Court's recent rulings regarding the DMA, including, 

inter alia, Corban, to all the parties' claims. 

Donofrio, J., concurs. 

Robb, P. J., concurs.