alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
John A. Williams, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Physiometrix, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Physiometrix, Inc.

|Date: March 30, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/JOHN A. WILLIAMSJohn A. Williams President and Chief Executive Officer,
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

I,
Daniel W. Muehl, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Physiometrix, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Physiometrix, Inc.

|Date: March 30, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/DANIEL W. MUEHLDaniel W. Muehl
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

February 26, 2009

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N. E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This
certification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

I, James V. Iaco, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Mirant Corporation certify that, subject to the qualifications noted below, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mirant Corporation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                     
|----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /S/ JAMES V. IACO                                   
|      |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Mirant Corporation and will be retained by Mirant Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T N A TH A N I EL M O RRI S, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. STEV EN M A CA RTH U R, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 15425 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 6 - c v - 0 0 7 1 8 - BESV PC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da B r i an E . S andova l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. N athani elM orri s, a N evada s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt’s s u m m aryju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e to h is s e r io u s m e d ic a l n e e d s in v io latio n o f th e E ig h th A m e n d m e n t.



# FI LED MA R 29 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSD S/ Res ea r ch 09- 15425 2 W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , T og uchiv. Chung , 3 9 1 F. 3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm entbecause M orri s f ai l ed to r a is e ag e n u in e is s u e o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rd e f

e n d an t w a s d e lib e r a te ly in d if f e r e n t to M o rr is ’s a lle g e din f e c tio n . Se e i d. a t1057 ( s t a t i ng tha tapr i s on of f i c i a l a c t s w i th de l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e onl yi f

he ors he know s of

a nd di s r e gar ds a n e x c e s s iv e r is kto in m a te h e a lth a n ds a f e ty ) ; Frankl i n v. O r. , State W el f are D i v. , 662 F . 2d 1337, 1344 ( 9th C i r . 1981) ( “ A di f f e r e nc e of opi ni on be tw e e n a pr i s one r - pa t i e nta nd pr i s on m e di c a l author i t i e s r e gar di ng tr e a tm e ntdoe s notgi ve ri se t o a § 1 98 3 cl ai m . ”) . M orri s’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6766

EDMOND LOWELL HANNAH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-10, CA-97-459)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edmond Lowell Hannah, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Edmond Lowell Hannah seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss

the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hannah v. United

States, Nos. CR-94-10, CA-97-459 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 20, 1998). The

motion to supplement the record is granted. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF ANDERSON CO UNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 1 9th

day of November, 2014 , the c ause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

BENITO HINOJOSA , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00334

- CV; Trial Court No. 29812

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these wor ds:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,

it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be,

and the same is, hereby dismissed as frivolous ; and that this decision be certified to the court

below for observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyler, this the 30 th day of January , 2015

.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. of the
Company.
 Date: November 4, 2005
    /s/ Thomas J. DepenbrockThomas J. DepenbrockChief Financial Officer
NS Group, Inc.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Longyi Group
International Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Jie Chen, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jie ChenJie Chen
President & Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Longyi Group International Holdings Limited and
will be retained by China Longyi Group International Holdings Limited and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28004-28005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11913]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Meeting, Notice of Vote, Explanation of Action Closing 
Meeting and List of Persons to Attend

May 13, 2010.
    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to Section 
3(a) of the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409), 5 U.S.C. 
552b:
    Agency Holding Meeting: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
    Date and Time: May 20, 2010, 1 p.m.
    Place: Room 2C, Commission Meeting Room, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters to be Considered: Non-Public Investigations and Inquiries, 
Enforcement Related Matters.
    Contact Person for More Information: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, 
Telephone (202) 502-8400.
    Chairman Wellinghoff and Commissioners Spitzer, Moeller, and Norris 
voted to hold a closed meeting on May 20, 2010. The certification of 
the General Counsel explaining the action closing the meeting is 
available for public inspection in the Commission's Public Reference 
Room at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Chairman and the Commissioners, their assistants, the 
Commission's Secretary, the General Counsel and members of her staff, 
and a stenographer are expected to attend the meeting. Other staff 
members from the Commission's program offices who

[[Page 28005]]

will advise the Commissioners in the matters discussed will also be 
present.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11913 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
BLD - 230 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 1 2

- 2759

___________ IN RE: JOHNNIE D

. YOUNG ,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(Related to Civ. No. 3

- 09

- cv - 02513 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

July 19, 2012 Before: SCIRICA, SMITH and CHAGARES , Circuit Judges

(Opinion f

iled : July 27, 2012 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Petitioner, Johnnie Delantro Young, seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Magistrate Judge to issue a report and recommendation addressing his petition for habeas corpus and compelling the District Court t o rule on his habeas petition. He maintains that the petition has been ripe for disposition since “the end of July 2011.” For the following reasons, mandamus relief is not warranted.2

Young filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2254 on December 22, 2009. Since that time there has been a constant stream of activity reflected on the District Court’s docket, including the following. The Commonwealth responded in March 2010, and in August 2010 the Magistrate Judge recommended the petition be denied. T he District Court declined to adopt the Magistrate Judge ’s report and recommendation and remanded the case to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. In February 2011, Young moved for summary judgment. In April 2011, the M agistrate Judge dismissed Young’s motion and ordered that he file one all

- inclusive habeas corp us petition. Young did so and the Commonwealth responded in July 2011 , after requesting and receiving an extension of time

. I n March 2012, Young filed an amend ed petition; the Commonwealth responded less than a month later

. The most recent entry on the docket is a document Young filed on May 29, 2012, which the District Court treated as a supplement to his habeas petition. This mandamus petition followed on Ju ne 21. Issuance of a writ of mandamus is proper in only extraordinary circumstances. In re Grand Jury , 680 F.3d 328, 340 (3d Cir. 2012). Its traditional purpose is “to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so. ” Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass’n , 319 U.S. 21, 26 (1943). A petitioner must demonstrate a “clear and indisputable” right to the writ.
Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976). While undue delay can
amount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction, Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996), it is plain from the District Court’s docket that there has been no such undue delay3

in Young’s case

. W e are confident that the M agistrate Judge will issue a report and recommendation expedi tiously

. Accordingly, we will deny the mandamus petition.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-61383) and
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-34109, 333-22637, 333-34139
and 333-62267) of H.T.E., Inc. of our reports dated April 10, 1998 and July 7,
1998, relating to the financial statements of UCS, Inc. (not presented
separately herein), which appear in this Form 10-K.
 
                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Miami, Florida
  March 29, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Westbank Corporation (the "Corporation") does hereby
certify to such officer's knowledge that:



         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
         of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
         contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Date:  May 5, 2004                        /s/ Donald R. Chase
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Donald R. Chase
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK,

Appellant,

v.

CHARTER SCHOOLS USA AT HOLLYWOOD, L.C. a Florida

Limited Liability Company, a/k/a CHARTER SCHOOLS USA AT 

HOLLYWOOD, LLC a/k/a CHARTER SCHOOLS USA AT 

HOLLYWOOD, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3060

[December 29, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carol Lisa Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 12-

35194.

Jeffrey B. Crockett of Coffey Burlington, P.L., Miami, for appellant.

Stephanie Alexander and Lisa MacClugage of Tripp Scott, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, and Thomas Scott of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
ACTIONS OF THE SEPTEMBER 9, 2015, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the Smithsonian Institution’s budget request for appropriated funds for 

fiscal year 2017 for presentation to the Office of Management and Budget. Any material 

changes in program plans incorporated into this budget shall be made only with the approval of 

the Board of Regents or its Executive Committee.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3811

___________

Hayward Cleveland, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Arkansas State Hospital, * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Defendant, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Arkansas Partnership Program, *

*

Appellee, *

*

Probate Court of Arkansas, *

*

Defendant. *

___________

 Submitted: June 10, 2003

 Filed: June 12, 2003 

___________

Before BOWMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas. 

-2-

Hayward Cleveland appeals the district court’s1

 order granting summary

judgment to defendant Arkansas Partnership Program, and dismissing without

prejudice his action challenging his continuing civil commitment. Having carefully

reviewed the record, we conclude summary judgment was proper. Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2529 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2529

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Orange 73.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2000

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Orange 73.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT ORANGE 73.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.32.25    Pigment Orange    Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     73 (CAS No.                                                             31/2003          ''
                     84632-59-7)                                                                               .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     3204.17.6085)..

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1884-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


California Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California (FEMA-1884-DR), dated March 8, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 18, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Sandy Coachman, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Michael H. Smith as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.


W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-12198 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P