alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2394

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize indirect graduate

medical education payments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 11, 2000

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

KERREY, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. TORRICELLI,

Mr. JOHNSON, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. KERRY, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. LEVIN,

Mr. SARBANES, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. REED, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. MIKULSKI, and Mr. SPECTER) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize

indirect graduate medical education payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teaching Hospital

5 Preservation Act of 2000’’.
2

•S 2394 IS

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF REDUCTION OF INDIRECT GRADUATE

2 MEDICAL EDUCATION PAYMENTS.

3 Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act

4 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(ii)) (as amended by section

5 111(a) of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced

6 Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 1501A–329),

7 as enacted into law by section 1000(a)(6) of Public Law

8 106–113) is amended—

9 (1) in subclause (IV), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the

10 end; and

11 (2) by striking subclauses (V) and (VI) and in12 serting the following:

13 ‘‘(V) on or after October 1, 2000, ‘c’

14 is equal to 1.6.’’.

Æ
# States in the Senate | Alaska

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Lisa Murkowski (R)***Hometown: Girdwood*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Dan Sullivan (R)***Hometown: Anchorage*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Alaska became the 49th state in the Union on January 3, 1959. The state’s first two senators, Bob Bartlett and Ernest Gruening, were sworn into office on January 7, 1959. Alaska’s longest-serving senator is Ted Stevens (1968–2009). Stevens served in several leadership positions in the Senate, including president pro tempore and Republican whip. In 2002 Lisa Murkowski became the first daughter of a senator to serve in the Senate, and in 2010, only the second person to win a U.S. Senate seat as a write-in candidate.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
EXHIBIT 15.1





Independent Registered


Public Accounting Firm’s Acknowledgement Letter







To Board of Directors and Stockholders


Northern States Financial Corporation






We are aware of the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8: No. 333-170065) of our report dated April 29, 2011 related to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Northern States Financial Corporation which is included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.




Under Rule 436(c) of the 1933 Act, our report is not a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the 1933 Act.






/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC


Chicago, Illinois


April 29, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

[LETTERHEAD OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS]


                      Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-21755) of First Lancaster Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiary of our report dated August 18, 1999, relating to the consolidated
financial statements, which appears in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders,
which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended June 30, 1999.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Lexington, Kentucky
September 23, 1999
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4971

_____________________________

GARY WINTERS,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

October 4, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Gary Winters, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant 

General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Exhibit 24.1

February 2, 2009



|                           |  |  |  |                           
|-------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------
|James V. Iaco              |  |  |  | Thomas E. Legro           
|1155 Perimeter Center West |  |  |  | 1155 Perimeter Center West
|Atlanta, Georgia 30338     |  |  |  | Atlanta, Georgia 30338    

Dear Mr. Iaco and Mr. Legro:

Mirant Corporation (the Company) proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Company and the undersigned directors of the Company,
individually as a director of the Company, hereby make, constitute and appoint James V. Iaco and Thomas E. Legro our true and lawful Attorneys for each of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the foregoing said Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any appropriate amendment or amendments thereto and any necessary exhibits.



Yours very truly,MIRANT CORPORATIONBy

/s/ Edward R. MullerEdward R. MullerBy

/s/ Thomas W. CasonThomas W. CasonBy

/s/ A. D. CorrellA. D. CorrellBy

/s/ Terry G. DallasTerry G. DallasBy

/s/ Thomas H. JohnsonThomas H. JohnsonBy

/s/ John T. MillerJohn T. MillerBy

/s/ Robert C. MurrayRobert C. MurrayBy

/s/ John M. QuainJohn M. QuainBy

/s/ William L. ThackerWilliam L. Thacker
NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
EXHIBIT 11.1 - CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                              Years ended December 31,
                                         1998           1997           1996

Average shares outstanding             2,779,655      2,386,953       1,716,418
  dilutive effect of stock options
  and warrants computed by use
  of treasury stock method                85,338              0               0

Computation of Earnings Per
  Share=Net Income/Average
  common and common share
  equivalent shares                (1)$  123,649    $(3,507,125)    $(6,579,444)
outstanding                            2,864,993      2,386,953       1,716,418
                                       ---------      ---------       ---------

Earnings Per Share                    $      .04    $     (1.47)    $     (3.84)




_________________

      (1)After dividends on Series D Preferred Stock in the amount of $72,600
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Newton Lincoln, Respondent, v. W. F. Fischer, as President of the Village of Mayville, Chautauqua County, New York, and Others, Constituting the Inspectors of Election of Said Village, Impleaded with J. H. Timmons, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.
Case 100 — MOTION

January 18.

#### Ponder, Etc. v. Lard.

APPEAL PROM WOLEE CIRCUIT COURT.

I. Appeals — Jurisdiction.-—In an action for damages for trespass in cutting timber, where a defendant although denying the plaintiff’s title to the land, does not claim title in himself, the title to the real estate is not so involved as to give this court jurisdiction of an appeal where the judgment was for less than the amount fixed by the statute as giving this court jurisdiction.

J. B. WHITE EOR APPELLANTS.

JOHN L. SCOTT & SON, pop. appellee.

JUDGE WHITE

delivered the opinion oe the court.

This is an action for trespass far cutting timber, brought by appellee against appellants in the Wolfe Circuit Court. Upon trial 'by jury a judgment of $25 was rendered against •appellants, that being the value of the timber cut as fixed, by the jury. The question of the jurisdiction of this court is presented by appellee in a motion to dismiss. If there he no question of title involved this court clearly has no juris•diction of a judgment of only $25.

The petition alleges title and possession of a certain boundary of land, and charges trespass by appellants cutting timber, etc. The answer “denies, that appellee (plaintiff below) is the owner or in possession of the boundary described or of any land extending west of the north 9 west line of Samuel Young,” etc., and “deny that they unlawfully or wrongfully entered, cut and removed timber,” etc. The answer nowhere claims the land as that of defendant, and while it denies the right of recovery the answer does not *606bring into question! tbe title, so that a judgment herein, would bar an action in ejectment.

Therefore, we are of opinion that the only amount in controversy is the judgment for $25, and that sum being below this court’s jurisdiction the appeal is dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 Certification of the Chairman of the Board of Management
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Certification I, Wolfgang Dondorf, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial conditions, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the company and have:  a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on evaluation; andc)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting.  5.

The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of
the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting. February 24, 2005 By: /s/ Wolfgang DondorfWolfgang DondorfChief Executive Officer(Chairman of the Management Board)
Exhibit 99.1

Report of Independent Auditors

Board of Directors
Eagle BancGroup, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated statement of condition of Eagle 
BancGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, not included
herein, and the related consolidated statements of income, and cash flows 
and changes in stockholders' equity for year then ended. 
These financial statements are the responsibility of the 
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to 
                                  -Page 129-
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free 
from material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, 
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts 
and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing 
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, 
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We 
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in 
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Eagle BancGroup, 
Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and the consolidated 
results of their operations and their cash flows for the year
then ended, in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles.

/S/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
January 17, 1997
EXHIBIT
32.2                                                                                                            CERTIFICATIONS
 
  CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT
TO
  18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  I,
Michael J. Shea, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Hooper Holmes, Inc.
  Dated:  November 7,
2008
  /s/ Michael J.
Shea
 
  __________________________
  Michael
J. Shea
  Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
  This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
 Certification of the Member of the Board of Management
(Chief Financial Officer)   Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial conditions, results
of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By: /s/ Manfred BenderManfred Bender
Chief Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2653

To suspend temporarily the duty on machines, and their parts, for use

in the manufacture of digital versatile discs (DVDs).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25, 2000

Mr. COVERDELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on machines, and their

parts, for use in the manufacture of digital versatile

discs (DVDs).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:
2

•S 2653 IS

‘‘ 9902.84.04 Machines or mechanical appliances, whether

imported separately or as an

entirety, and

parts thereof, for

use in the manufacture of digital

versatile discs

(DVDs) (provided for in subheading

8464.20.50) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/03 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      NORTHERN STATES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                      -------------------------------------






Section 906 Certification

     We hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this quarterly report of
Northern States Financial Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Northern States Financial
Corporation as of and for the periods covered by the Report.




Date:  November 11, 2003                By:     /s/ Fred Abdula
       -----------------                    -----------------------------
                                                Fred Abdula
                                                Chairman of the Board of
                                                Directors and President



Date:  November 11, 2003                By:    /s/ Thomas M. Nemeth
       -----------------                    -----------------------------
                                                Thomas M. Nemeth
                                                Vice President and Treasurer
ACTION OF THE APRIL 11, 2013, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the Secretary’s request for authority to lease approximately 22,777 

rentable square feet of administrative space for the Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibition 

Service, Smithsonian Affiliations, and the Office of Fellowships and Internships at 470/490 

L’Enfant Plaza North, SW, Washington, DC 20024. [2013.04.01]
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10(i)(2)

                       AMENDMENT TO 1ST SOURCE CORPORATION
                             1992 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Section 5.4 of 1st Source's 1992 Stock Option Plan is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:

5.       Terms and Conditions of Options

         5.4      Payment for shares purchased pursuant to exercise of an option
                  shall be made  either in cash or by check,  or by  delivery in
                  exchange  for such option  shares  Company  shares with a fair
                  market  value on the  date of  exercise  equal  to the  option
                  price,  or a combination  of both. If Company shares are used,
                  an optionee  may tender only shares  without  legend that such
                  optionee  has  owned for six  months  or  longer  prior to the
                  exercise  date of the option;  provided,  however,  that as to
                  options issued before this amendment this provision shall bind
                  only option  holders who consent to it. Fair market  value for
                  the purpose of this  Paragraph 5.4 shall have the same meaning
                  as provided  in  Paragraph  5.1.  No  optionee  shall have any
                  rights to  dividends  or other  rights of a  stockholder  with
                  respect to shares subject to an option until such optionee has
                  given  written  notice of  exercise of such option and paid in
                  full for such shares. The maximum number of shares that may be
                  withheld by the Company  from option  shares at the time of an
                  option   exercise  shall  not  exceed  the  number  of  shares
                  necessary  to meet the  optionee's  required  tax  withholding
                  based on the minimum  statutory  withholding rates for federal
                  and state tax  purposes,  including  payroll  taxes,  that are
                  applicable  to  the  optionee's  supplemental  taxable  income
                  generated by the exercise.