alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.7
 (REZNICK GROUP LOGO)
    
    Reznick Group, P.C.
    
    Tel: (404) 847-94472002 Summit Boulevard
    
    Fax: (404) 847-9495Suite 1000
    
    www.reznickgroup.comAtlanta, GA 30319-1470
   Registration Statement No.
    
    Form
    
    Description333-05257
    
    Form S-8
    
    1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, Stock
Option Agreement entered into, effective January 4, 1995, by and between Sunrise Assisted Living,
Inc. and David W. Faeder333-38430
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan, as Amended333-26837
    
    Form S-8
    
    1997 Stock Option Plan333-57291
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, as Amended333-57293
    
    Form S-8
    
    1998 Stock Option Plan333-78313
    
    Form S-8
    
    1999 Stock Option Plan333-38432
    
    Form S-8
    
    2000 Stock Option Plan333-61918
    
    Form S-8
    
    2001 Stock Option Plan333-88570
    
    Form S-8
    
    2002 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan333-61914
    
    Form S-8
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan333-109228
    
    Form S-8
    
    2003 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan333-120738
    
    Form S-8
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 /s/ Reznick Group, P.C. 
 n n n n n n n n n
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund IV (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |  |  |                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel Stephenson             
|                      |  |  |  | Daniel Stephenson, General Partner
|                      |  |  |  | Rancon Realty Fund IV
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael Giordano, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fedders Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     three month period ended March 31, 2004 (the registrant's fourth fiscal
     quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
     is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2004

/s/ Michael Giordano
--------------------
Michael Giordano
Chief Financial Officer

                                       24
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6159

WINFIELD DACOST SPEEDE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES E. THOMPSON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-573-R)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winfield Dacost Speede, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997) and the order denying his motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Speede v. Thompson, No. CA-96-573-R (W.D. Va.

Dec. 17, 1996 and Jan. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     1,487
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     5,073
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               53,883
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    53,883
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      53,883
<LOANS>                                  107,564
<ALLOWANCE>                                (923)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           172,666
<DEPOSITS>                               133,995
<SHORT-TERM>                              15,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        1,230
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      13
<OTHER-SE>                                22,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           172,666
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            7,681
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          3,257
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             156
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          11,094
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         7,431
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,703
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      3,391
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                183
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            15
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            4,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (747)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 (747)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               (489)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.38)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            (2.53)
<LOANS-NON>                                  705
<LOANS-PAST>                                 705
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           1,710
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               19
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             907
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                178
<RECOVERIES>                                  11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            923
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         923
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      847


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.        § 1350,

AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In        connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John        E. Balzarini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,        that:

 

(1) The        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities        Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the        financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| Date: May 8, 2008 |                    |
|-------------------|-------------------------|
|              | /s/ John E. Balzarini   |
|              | John E. Balzarini       |
|              | Chief Financial Officer |
#### Philadelphia Griffith, Respondent, *v.*Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Failure to mom to dismiss a complaint*— ■ *a concession that there is sufficient evidence to go to the jury.*

A failure to move to dismiss the complaint or for the direction of a verdict at the close of the testimony on both sides is a concession that there was then evidence sufficient to carry the case to the jury: in the face of such a concession an appellate tribunal cannot review the denial of a motion to set aside the verdict.

*142Appeal bj tbe defendant, tbe Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company, from a judgment of tbe Supreme Court in favor of tbe plaintiff, entered in tbe office of tbe cleric of tbe county of Kings on the 11th day of March, 1895, upon tbe verdict of a jury rendered after a trial at the Kings County Circuit, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 12th day of March, 1895, denying tbe defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon tbe minutes.

*Tracy, Boardmam, &*Platt, for the appellant.

Grout, *De Fere &*Mayer, for the respondent.

Pratt, J.:

The only points made by appellant relate to tbe sufficiency of the evidence to prove freedom from negligence by plaintiff and the fact of negligence by itself. These points arise upon appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint when plaintiff rested, and the motion .to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. There was no motion to dismiss at the close of the case nor was there any request for a direction. If plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient on the question of her own or defendant’s negligence, the point is not available, provided the case on all the evidence was for the jury. It - seems to have been so regarded by defendant. Its failure to move to dismiss or for the direction of a verdict at the close of the testimony on both sides has been held to be a concession that there was then evidence sufficient to carry the case to the jury. *(Barrett*v. *Third Ave. R. R. Co.,*45 N. Y. 632.) This rule seems to make out a waiver of the exception for denial of the motion to dismiss, that is to say, it is a concession that the case was so changed since that motion was made that the case had come to be one for the jury. (Id. See, also, *Sternwald*v. Siegel, 57 N. Y. St. Repr. 491; *Eckensberger*v. *Amend, 1*Misc. Rep. 452; S. C., on appeal, 10 id. 145.) With this concession before us we cannot review the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict. Even if it were otherwise, we think that, although the case was a close one on the questions of negligence, it was properly, as it certainly was fairly and carefully, submitted to the jury by the learned trial judge.

The order and judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Dykman, J., concurred; Brown, P. J., not sitting.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Robert C. Hagerty,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Polycom, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Polycom, Inc.



|                  |  |        |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|February 28, 2007 |  | By:    |  | /s/    ROBERT C.
HAGERTY             
|                  |  | Name:  |  | Robert C. Hagerty                    
|                  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



Certification of the Senior Vice
President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Michael R. Kourey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Polycom, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Polycom, Inc.



|                  |  |        |  |                                                                              
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|February 28, 2007 |  | By:    |  | /s/    MICHAEL R.
KOUREY                                                     
|                  |  | Name:  |  | Michael R. Kourey                                                            
|                  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6682

CLAY VANCE CONNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER PAULEY; ALLEN STRUCK, Officer; STEVE

FANNING, Officer; BOB ROBERTSON,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DAVID L. SMITH; DOCTOR AMONETTE; KERRY

DONNELLY, M.D.; CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY; DANNY

CRIGGER; NURSE DOUDDY; JERRY W. PAYNE; CARL

PENNINGTON; L. WHITE; J. N. LEFFETT; PATTY L.

HUFFMAN; J. D. TERRY; OFFICER PARR; J. L.

STAFFORD; MELANIE FUNK; DEANNE DOSS; RUFUS

FLEMING; G. WADE, Officer; OFFICER WALTERS;

MR. HOWARD; MR. CLIFTON; M. BARKSDALE; JAMES

HOKE; OFFICER WHITEHEAD; OFFICER FERRELL;

FRANK HARDUCH; SERGEANT WILSON; B. L. JOHNSON;

VAN ROADT; P. L. HANF, Officer; A. D. ROBINSON; ELLIS B. WRIGHT; GARY L. BASS; J. V.

BEALE; DEPUTY WARDEN A-UNIT; F. SPENCE; CHIEF

OF SECURITY, Bland Correctional Center,

Greeensville CC, A-Unit; OFFICER PARKER;

MICHAEL TIDWELL; D. BROWN, Officer; J. L.

DODSON, Officer; MR. MCCATHY; J. HALSEYHARRIS; L. G. GOODE; S. S. AVENTT; G.

MCLINLEY; L. MASON; HOWARD AKERS, Lieutenant;

E. TAYLOR, Officer; OFFICER ZALLICOFFER;

LIEUTENANT HEALEY; CARL FLOWERS; A. M. JUDKINS; RICHARD A. YOUNG; P. J. RICH; VALERIE D.

RASHEED; JAMES A. SMITH; CORRINE R. ROWLETTE;

T. C. BROWN; EDWARD MURRAY; EDWARD C. MORRIS;

PATRICK GURNEY; LOUIS B. CEI; G. JONES; D.

AHLADA; J. P. MCMILLAN; ROBERT M. MCCLEBRY; I.
2

P. SMITH; MR. LOWENHAGER; BALVIR KAPIL, Doctor; JOHN & JANE DOES, M. S. B......L.G.O.....

E. K.; OFFICER JONES; SERGEANT MORRILL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge; Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-249-R)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clay Vance Conner, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district courts order entering

judgment in favor of Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994)

action. We have reviewed the record, the trial testimony, and the

district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Conner v. Smith, No. CA-94-249-R

(W.D. Va. May 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4778 

To authorize the award of a military service medal to members of the 

Armed Forces who were exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of 

participation in the testing of nuclear weapons or under other circumstances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 30, 2014 

Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself, Mr. JONES, and Ms. BORDALLO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the award of a military service medal to members of the Armed Forces who were exposed to ionizing 

radiation as a result of participation in the testing of 

nuclear weapons or under other circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Atomic Veterans Serv5 ice Medal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ATOMIC VETERANS SERVICE MEDAL. 

7 (a) SERVICE MEDAL REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 

8 Defense shall design and produce a military service medal, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4778 IH

1 to be known as the ‘‘Atomic Veterans Service Medal’’, to 

2 honor retired and former members of the Armed Forces 

3 who are radiation-exposed veterans (as such term is de4 fined in section 1112(c)(3) of title 38, United States 

5 Code). 

6 (b) DISTRIBUTION OF MEDAL.— 

7 (1) ISSUANCE TO RETIRED AND FORMER MEM8 BERS.—At the request of a radiation-exposed vet9 eran, the Secretary of Defense shall issue the Atom10 ic Veterans Service Medal to the veteran. 

11 (2) ISSUANCE TO NEXT-OF-KIN.—In the case of 

12 a radiation-exposed veteran who is deceased, the 

13 Secretary may provide for issuance of the Atomic 

14 Veterans Service Medal to the next-of-kin of the per15 son. 

16 (3) APPLICATION.—The Secretary shall prepare 

17 and disseminate as appropriate an application by 

18 which radiation-exposed veterans and their next-of19 kin may apply to receive the Atomic Veterans Serv20 ice Medal. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
(DELOITTE LOGO)
    
    Deloitte&Touche LLP
1750 Tysons Blvd.
McLean, VA 22102-4219
USA
Tel: +1 703 251 1000
Fax: +1 703 251 3400
www.deloitte.com
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
  RegistrationStatement Number
    
    Form
    
    Description333-05257
    
    Form S-8
    
    1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, Stock
Option Agreement entered into, effective January 4, 1995, by and between Sunrise
Assisted Living, Inc. and David W. Faeder333-38430
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan, as Amended333-21817
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended333-26837
    
    Form S-8
    
    1997 Stock Option Plan333-57291
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, as Amended333-05257
    
    Form S-8
    
    1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended333-57293
    
    Form S-8
    
    1998 Stock Option Plan333-78313
    
    Form S-8
    
    1999 Stock Option Plan333-38432
    
    Form S-8
    
    2000 Stock Option Plan333-61918
    
    Form S-8
    
    2001 Stock Option Plan333-88570
    
    Form S-8
    
    2002 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan333-61914
    
    Form S-8
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan333-109228
    
    Form S-8
    
    2003 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan333-120738
    
    Form S-8
    
    Employee Stock Purchase Plan333-160796
    
    Form S-8
    
    2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to her knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Julie A. PangelinanJulie A. PangelinanChief Financial Officer


Date: February 25,
2011
#### Diana R. Smith, Respondent, v. Louise M. Keller, Personally and as Executrix, etc., of Ellen Raidy, Deceased, and Others, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, and because of errors in the admission and rejection of evidence.