28298 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Notices 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–71,118 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Rexnord Industries, LLC, 

Industrial Chain and Conveyor Division, 

including on-site leased workers from 

Stivers, West Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who 

became totally or partially separated from 

employment on or after September 8, 2008, 

through March 11, 2012, and all workers in 

the group threatened with total or partial 

separation from employment on date of 

certification through two years from the date 

of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of 

May, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12114 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–70,405; TA–W–70,405FF] 

Avaya Inc., Worldwide Services Group, 

Global Support Services (GSS) 

Organization, Including On-Site Leased 

Workers From Kelly Services Inc., P/S 

Partner Solutions Ltd., Exceed 

Resources Inc., Real Soft, InfoQuest 

Consulting Group, Ccsi Inc., ICONMA 

LLC, MGD Consulting, Inc., Case 

Interactive LLC., Sapphire 

Technologies, Highlands Ranch, CO; 

Including Employees in Support of 

Avaya Inc., Worldwide Services Group, 

Global Support Services (GSS) 

Organization, Highlands Ranch, CO 

Operating Out of the State of 

Nebraska; Amended Certification 

Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on September 11, 2009, 

applicable to workers of Avaya Inc., 

Worldwide Services Group, Global 

Support Services (GSS) Organization, 

including on-site leased workers from 

Kelly Services Inc., P/S Partner 

Solutions Ltd., Exceed Resources Inc., 

Real Soft, InfoQuest Consulting Group, 

CCSI Inc., ICONMA LLC, MGD 

Consulting, Inc., Case Interactive LLC., 

and Sapphire Technologies, Highlands 

Ranch, Colorado. The notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57338). 

At the request of the State Agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers provide technical support for 

communication systems. 

New information shows that worker 

separations have occurred involving 

employees in support of the Highlands 

Ranch, Colorado location of the subject 

firm working off-site at various locations 

in the state of Nebraska. These workers 

provided technical support for 

communication systems supporting the 

Highlands Ranch, Colorado production 

facility of the subject firm. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include workers in 

support of the Highlands Ranch, 

Colorado location facility of the subject 

firm working out of the state of 

Nebraska. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–70,405 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Avaya Inc., Worldwide 

Services Group, Global Support Services 

(GSS) Organization, including on-site leased 

workers from Kelly Services Inc., P/S Partner 

Solutions Ltd., Exceed Resources Inc., Real 

Soft, InfoQuest Consulting Group, CCSI Inc., 

ICONMA LLC, MGD Consulting, Inc., Case 

Interactive LLC., and Sapphire Technologies, 

Highlands Ranch, Colorado (TA–W–70,405), 

including employees in support of Avaya 

Inc., Worldwide Services Group, Global 

Support Services (GSS) Organization 

Highlands Ranch, Colorado working off-site 

in the states of Florida (TA–W–70,405A), 

California (TA–W–70,405B), South Carolina 

(TA–W–70,405C), Alabama (TA–W– 

70,405D), Michigan (TA–W–70,405E), 

Arizona (TA–W–70,405F), Ohio (TA–W– 

70,405G), Pennsylvania (TA–W–70,405H), 

North Carolina (TA–W–70,405I), Colorado 

(TA–W–70,405J), New York (TA–W– 

70,405K), Maryland (TA–W–70,405L), 

Georgia (TA–W–70,405M), New Jersey (TA– 

W–70,405N), Indiana (TA–W–70,405O), 

Tennessee (TA–W–70,405P), Wisconsin (TA– 

W–70,405Q), Oregon (TA–W–70,405R), 

Mississippi (TA–W–70,405S), Illinois (TA– 

W–70,405T), Texas (TA–W–70,405U), Iowa 

(TA–W–70,405V), Oklahoma (TA–W– 

70,405W), Washington (TA–W–70,405X), 

South Dakota (TA–W–70,405Y), Nevada 

(TA–W–70,405Z), New Hampshire (TA–W– 

70,405AA), Montana (TA–W–70,405BB), 

Virginia (TA–W–70,405CC), Massachusetts 

(TA–W–70,405DD), Connecticut (TA–W– 

70,405EE) and Nebraska (TA–W–70,405FF), 

who became totally or partially separated 

from who became totally or partially 

separated from employment on or after May 

19, 2008, through September 11, 2011, and 

all workers in the group threatened with total 

or partial separation from employment on 

date of certification through two years from 

the date of certification, are eligible to apply 

for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of 

May, 2010. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12112 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of April 12, 2010 

through April 23, 2010. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Notices 28299 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 

1-year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–72,497: Utah Stamping 

Company, Leased Workers from 

SOS and ESSI–LUMEA, Clearfield, 

UT: October 5, 2008. 

TA–W–72,506: GHT-Craft Steel LLC, 

Grand Rapids, MI: October 5, 2008. 

TA–W–72,590: Taminco Higher Amines, 

Inc., Including Leased Workers 

From Orbital Technical Solutions, 

URS, etc., Riverview, MI: October 

13, 2008. 

TA–W–72,618: Baker Furniture, 

Highpoint, NC: October 16, 2008. 

TA–W–72,759: Donsco, Inc., Belleville, 

PA: November 3, 2008. 

TA–W–72,856: Deco Products Company, 

LLP, Decorah, IA: November 13, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,865: Valenite, LLC, Leased 

Workers From Snelling Staffing 

Services & The Creative Group, 

Madison Heights, MI: November 16, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,935: T-Shirt International, 

Inc., Leased Workers from Express 

Professional Services, Culloden, 

WV: November 18, 2008. 

TA–W–73,069: Allen Edmonds Shoe 

Corporation, Lewiston, ME: 

December 8, 2008. 

TA–W–73,164: General Motors 

Corporation, Renaissance Center, 

Leased Workers From Accretive 

Solutions, etc., Detroit MI: 

December 18, 2008. 

TA–W–73,306: Lynn Ladder and 

Scaffolding Co., Inc., Orwigsburg, 

PA: January 6, 2009. 

TA–W–73,338: American General, Life 

Brokerage, American International 

Group, Leased Workers from 

Adecco, Milwaukee, WI: January 20, 

2009. 

TA–W–73,357: Hutchinson Technology, 

Inc., Disk Drive Components, Eau 

Claire, WI: January 14, 2009. 

TA–W–73,446: Genesis Networks 

Solutions, Inc., Abilene, TX: 

February 3, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W–71,043: Philip Morris USA, Altria 

Group, Cabarrus Manufacturing 

Plant, Concord, NC: May 29, 2008. 

TA–W–71,845: Lattice Semiconductor 

Corporation, Leased Workers from 

Robert Half International, Express 

Personnel, Hillsboro, OR: July 28, 

2008. 

TA–W–72,170: Learjet, Inc., Wichita 

Division, Leased Workers from 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
28300 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Notices 

Aerotek, Atsi, Cantec etc., Wichita, 

KS: August 26, 2008. 

TA–W–72,329: Sabritec, Leased Workers 

from Mattson Resources, Volt 

Temporary Services, Irvine, CA: 

September 15, 2008. 

TA–W–72,354: Fair Isaac Corporation, 

Helpdesk and PC Support, San 

Rafael, CA: September 14, 2008. 

TA–W–72,556: Sonus Networks, Inc., 

Quality Assurance Group, The 

System Verification Testing Group, 

Westford, MA: October 5, 2008. 

TA–W–72,704A: Starwood Hotels & 

Resorts Worldwide, Corporate IT 

Division, Leased Workers from 

Computer Merchant, LTD, Austin, 

TX: September 30, 2008. 

TA–W–72,704B: Starwood Hotels & 

Resorts Worldwide, Corporate IT 

Division, Leased Workers from 

Computer Merchant, LTD, White 

Plains, NY: September 30, 2008. 

TA–W–72,704C: Starwood Hotels & 

Resorts Worldwide, Corporate IT 

Division, Leased Workers from 

Computer Merchant, LTD, Phoenix, 

AZ: September 30, 2008. 

TA–W–72,704: Starwood Hotels & 

Resorts Worldwide, Corporate IT 

Division, Leased Workers from 

Computer Merchant, LTD, 

Braintree, MA: September 30, 2008. 

TA–W–72,757: Intermet U.S. Holding, 

dba Intermet, New River Foundry, 

Radford, VA: October 28, 2008. 

TA–W–73,022: Autodesk, Inc., Platform 

Solutions and Emerging Business 

Division, San Rafael, CA: November 

24, 2008. 

TA–W–73,036A: Tracksure Insurance 

Agency, Inc., Assurant, Inc., Hazard 

Insurance Processing, Tustin, CA: 

December 4, 2008. 

TA–W–73,036: Tracksure Insurance 

Agency, Inc., Assurant, Inc., Hazard 

Insurance Processing, Santa Ana, 

CA: December 4, 2008. 

TA–W–73,107: Infrasoft International, 

LLC, State College, PA: December 

15, 2008. 

TA–W–73,125: Baker Hughes Oilfield 

Operation, Inc., Enterprise Finance 

Organization, Leased Workers of 

Kelly Services, Houston, TX: 

December 16, 2008. 

TA–W–73,133: CVG–Mayflower Vehicle 

Systems LLC, Norwalk, OH: 

December 17, 2008. 

TA–W–73,146: IBM, Global Business 

Services Division, Application 

Management Services Business, 

Charleston, WV: December 21, 

2008. 

TA–W–73,149: Ashland, Inc., Ashland 

Hercules Water Technology, 

Kearny, NJ: December 18, 2008. 

TA–W–73,150: Hyatt Corporation as an 

Agent for Manchester Resorts, LP, 

Account Department, San Diego, 

CA: December 17, 2008. 

TA–W–73,174: EMD Chemicals Inc., 

Leased Workers from Ajilen, 

Ranstad, Assigend Counsel and 

Emerson Personnel, Gibbstown, NJ: 

December 21, 2008. 

TA–W–73,189: Lear Corporation, Loma 

Verde El Paso Distribution Center, 

Leased Workers from Manpower 

and Kelly, El Paso, TX: December 

18, 2008. 

TA–W–73,197: Rexam Consumer 

Plastics, Leased Workers From CBS 

Personnel Services, S&S Staffing, 

etc., Holden, MA: December 29, 

2008. 

TA–W–73,270: Atmel Corporation, 

Finance Group, Leased Workers 

from Volt Accountabilities, 

Colorado Springs, CO: January 8, 

2009. 

TA–W–73,278A: Maersk Agency USA, 

Inc., North America Information 

Systems, Leased Workers IBM, 

Consonus, and Sarcom, Charlotte, 

NC: January 12, 2009. 

TA–W–73,278B: Maersk Agency USA, 

Inc., North America Information 

Systems, A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, 

Carney, MD: January 12, 2009. 

TA–W–73,278: Maersk Agency USA, 

Inc., North America Information 

Systems, Leased Workers GMM 

Enterprises, LLC, ICS, Madison, NJ: 

January 12, 2009. 

TA–W–73,316: Yale Sportswear 

Corporation, Federalsburg, MD: 

January 10, 2009. 

TA–W–73,320: Rio Tinto Services, Inc., 

Salt Lake City Rio Tinto Regional 

Center, Leased Workers from Prince 

Perelson, South Jordan, UT: 

December 28, 2008. 

TA–W–73,322: Hartford Financial 

Services Group, Inc., Claims 

Department/Auto Commercial 

Liability, Phoenix, AZ: January 15, 

2009. 

TA–W–73,341: WestPoint Home, Inc., 

Biddeford, ME: January 22, 2009. 

TA–W–73,343: Convergys, International 

Management Group, Lake Mary, FL: 

January 19, 2009. 

TA–W–73,397: Remy, Inc., Meridian, 

MS: February 1, 2009. 

TA–W–73,420A: Alticor, Inc., Including 

Access Business Group 

International LLC, Amway, Ada, MI: 

February 1, 2009. 

TA–W–73,420: Alticor, Inc., Including 

Access Business Group 

International LLC, Amway, Buena 

Park, CA: February 1, 2009. 

TA–W–73,489: Sonoco Products 

Company, Orrville, OH: February 2, 

2009. 

TA–W–73,543: Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, 

Including Leased Workers of Labor 

Ready, Prospect Harbor, ME: 

February 22, 2009. 

TA–W–73,663: Appleton Papers, Inc., 

Finance and Information 

Technology Divisions, Appleton, 

WI: March 8, 2009. 

TA–W–73,667: Saint-Gobain 

Performance Plastics, Polymer 

Products Div., Leased Workers from 

Dimension Staffing, Monroe 

Staffing, Bristol, RI: April 24, 2010. 

TA–W–73,808: Maersk Agency USA, 

Inc., Maersk, Inc., A.P. MollerMaersk A/S, Madison, NJ: January 

12, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–71,374: GMPT Warren 

Transmission, GM Powertrain 

Division, General Motors Company, 

Warren, MI: June 16, 2008. 

TA–W–71,470: Unifi, Inc., Plant #3, 

Nylon Division, Madison, NC: June 

29, 2008. 

TA–W–71,923: Decker Logging, Inc., 

Libby, MT: July 19, 2008. 

TA–W–72,125: Manitowoc Cranes, Inc., 

Port Washington Division, Port 

Washington, WI: August 25, 2008. 

TA–W–72,470: McKenzie Foam And 

Supply, Inc., McKenzie, TN: 

September 30, 2008. 

TA–W–72,548: AGC Flat Glass North 

America, Inc., dba AGC Glass Co. 

North America, Leased Workers 

from Express Employment, 

Elizabethtown, KY: October 7, 2008. 

TA–W–72,639: Faurecia, Faurecia 

Seating, Seating Div. Leased 

Workers from Harvard Resources 

Group, Shelby Township, MI: 

October 20, 2008. 

TA–W–72,646: Michigan Mechanical 

Services, Inc., Taylor, MI: October 

21, 2008. 

TA–W–72,707: Air-Way Manufacturing 

Co., Leased Workers from Pro 

Resources, Hamilton, IN: October 

23, 2008. 

TA–W–72,844: Paramount Precision 

Products, Inc., Leased Workers from 

Aerotek Commercial Staffing, Oak 

Park, MI: November 6, 2008. 

TA–W–73,028: TRW Automotive, Body 

Control Systems North America 

Division, Galesville, WI: October 11, 

2008. 

TA–W–73,041: Pilkington North 

America, Inc., Lathrop, CA: 

December 2, 2008. 

TA–W–73,057: Lamjen, Inc., A 

Subsidiary of Custom Engineering, 

Erie, PA: December 7, 2008. 

TA–W–73,253: Injex Industries, Inc., 

Leased Workers from the Solutions 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Notices 28301 

Group, Hayward, CA: January 12, 

2009. 

TA–W–73,262: Vuteq California 

Corporation, Leased Workers from 

Staffchex and Randstad, Hayward, 

CA: January 12, 2009. 

TA–W–73,333: Aegis Communications 

Group, Inc., ACZ and ACY Group, 

Elkins, WV: January 21, 2009. 

TA–W–73,497: Aisin Manufacturing 

California, LLC, Including Leased 

Workers of Premier Staffing, 

Stockton, CA: February 8, 2009. 

TA–W–73,660: Rebuilt, LLC, Previously 

Known as ILevel by Weyerhaeuser, 

Commercial Sales Division, Boise, 

ID: March 8, 2009. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W–71,047: UAW–Chrysler National 

Training Center, Detroit, MI. 

TA–W–71,235: Vairex Corporation, A 

Subsidiary of Vairex International 

LTD., Boulder, CO. 

TA–W–71,367: Siegwerk USA Company, 

On-Site Workers at Graphics 

Packaging, Lawrenceburg, TN. 

TA–W–73,232: R.L. Torresdal Company, 

Inc., Ossian, IA. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

TA–W–73,000: Ayrshire Electronics of 

Mississippi, LLC, CDR 

Manufacturing, Inc., Corinth, MS. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W–71,017: Diversified Textile 

Machinery Corporation, Kings 

Mountain, NC. 

TA–W–71,083: Montana Renewable 

Resources, LLP, Eureka, MT. 

TA–W–71,307: Clear Lake Lumber, Inc., 

Spartanburg, PA. 

TA–W–71,335: Suburban Precision Mold 

Company, Inc., Meadville, PA. 

TA–W–71,379: General Motors 

Company, formerly known as 

General Motors Corporation, 

Wentzville Assembly Center, 

Wentzville, MO. 

TA–W–71,394: Cascade Structural 

Laminators, Willamina, OR. 

TA–W–71,434: Eramet Marietta, Inc., 

Special Products Division, Marietta, 

OH. 

TA–W–71,456: Knight Celotex, Sunbury, 

PA. 

TA–W–71,494: Johns Manville, 

Engineered Products Division, 

Spartanburg, SC. 

TA–W–71,607: Wisconsin Mechanical, 

LLC, Waukesha, WI. 

TA–W–71,750: E.I. DuPont, Electronic 

Technologies Division, Circleville, 

OH. 

TA–W–71,817: Clark Equipment 

Company, Bobcat Company 

Division, Gwinner, ND. 

TA–W–71,868: Hamilton Sundstrand, 

Sundyne Electromagnetics, United 

Technologies, Leased Workers from 

Aerotek, Pleasant Prairie, WI. 

TA–W–71,936: Seaboard Folding Box 

Company, LLC, CJ Fox Division, 

Providence, RI. 

TA–W–71,953: Vanguard National 

Trailer Corporation, Monon, IN. 

TA–W–71,976: Powerboss, Inc., 

Minuteman International, 

Aberdeen, NC. 

TA–W–72,152: Marvel Industries, 

Northland Corporation, Richmond, 

IN. 

TA–W–72,220: Ecolab, Leased Workers 

from Spherion, Hebron, OH. 

TA–W–72,247: National Briquetting 

Corporation, Harsco, also s 

Performix East Chicago, East 

Chicago, IN. 

TA–W–72,554: General Motors 

Company, Pontiac Assembly, 

Pontiac, MI. 

TA–W–72,903: Ford Motor Company, 

Walton Hills Stamping Plant, 

Division Stamping Business Unit of 

Ford Motor, Walton Hills, OH. 

TA–W–72,957: Hoffco-Comet Industries, 

Richmond, IN. 

TA–W–72,999: Shain Solutions, 

Diversified Woodcrafts, Inc., 

Philipsburg, PA. 

TA–W–70,941: Performance Powder 

Coating, LLC, Kokomo, IN. 

TA–W–71,372: Starcom MediaVest 

Group, Detroit, MI. 

TA–W–71,483A: Continental Airlines, 

Inc., Reservations Division— 

Tampa, Tampa, FL. 

TA–W–71,483B: Continental Airlines, 

Inc., Reservations Division—Salt 

Lake City, Salt Lake City, UT. 

TA–W–71,483: Continental Airlines, 

Inc., Reservations Division, 

Houston, TX. 

TA–W–71,653: Minnesota Industries, 

Chisholm, MN. 

TA–W–71,667: Fort Smith Express, Inc., 

Fort Smith, AR. 

TA–W–71,789: Lyon Workspace 

Products, LLC, L&D Group, Inc., 

Leased Workers from Paige 

Personnel, Montgomery, IL. 

TA–W–71,995: Honeywell Technology 

Solutions, Inc., Honeywell 

International, Inc., Piketon, OH. 

TA–W–72,145: HSBC Finance 

Corporation, A Subsidiary of HSBC 

North America Holdings, Inc., 

Dubois, PA. 

TA–W–72,203: Georgino Industrial 

Supply, Penfield, PA. 

TA–W–72,680: Goodwill Printing 

Company, Ferndale, MI. 

TA–W–72,950: Pittsburgh Coatings, Inc., 

Ambridge, PA. 

TA–W–73,088A: Emerson Process 

Management, Rosemount Division, 

Database and Purchasing Groups, 

Chanhassen, MN. 

TA–W–73,088: Emerson Process 

Management, Rosemount Division, 

Database and Purchasing Groups, 

Eden Prairie, MN. 

TA–W–73,114: Maddox Drilling, San 

Angelo, TX. 

TA–W–73,367: Caliber Auto Transfer of 

Ohio, Inc., Fostoria, OH. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(c)(2) have not 

been met. The workers’ firm (or 

subdivision) is not a Supplier to or a 

Downstream Producer for a firm whose 

workers were certified as eligible to 

apply for TAA. 

TA–W–70,949A: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Naperville, IL. 

TA–W–70,949B: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, New 

Boston, MI. 

TA–W–70,949C: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Beaverton, OR. 

TA–W–70,949D: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Carrollton, TX. 

TA–W–70,949E: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Fontana, 

CA. 

TA–W–70,949F: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Lathrop, 

CA. 

TA–W–70,949G: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Denver, 

CO. 

TA–W–70,949H: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Ontario, 

CA. 

TA–W–70,949I: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Hazelwood, MO. 

TA–W–70,949J: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Morrow, 

GA. 

TA–W–70,949K: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Memphis, 

TN. 

TA–W–70,949L: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Tappan, 

NY. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
28302 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W–70,949M: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Mansfield, MA. 

TA–W–70,949N: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Plymouth, 

MN. 

TA–W–70,949O: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Streetsboro, OH. 

TA–W–70,949P: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Orlando, 

FL. 

TA–W–70,949Q: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Milwaukee, WI. 

TA–W–70,949R: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Warren, 

MI. 

TA–W–70,949S: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, 

Marysville, MI. 

TA–W–70,949: Chrysler LLC, Mopar 

Parts Distribution Center, Center 

Line, MI. 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W–71,562: Magneti Marelli 

Powertrain USA, LLC, Sanford, NC. 

TA–W–71,734A: Morris Yachts, Inc., 

Trenton, ME. 

TA–W–71,734: Morris Yachts, Inc., Bass 

Harbor, ME. 

TA–W–73,287: HP Enterprise Services, 

Formerly Known As EDS/HP, Fort 

Worth, TX. 

TA–W–73,304: Suntron Corporation, 

Newberg, OR. 

TA–W–73,337: Vector CANtech, Novi, 

MI. 

TA–W–73,340: Carestream Health, Inc., 

Sensitizing Department, Windsor, 

CO. 

TA–W–73,387: CC Forbes, Big Lake, TX. 

TA–W–73,442: International Business 

Machines Corporation, IT Support 

7—IBM, Boulder, CO. 

TA–W–73,452: Safmarine, Inc., 

Madison, NJ. 

TA–W–73,474: Managed Business 

Solutions, Santa Rosa, CA. 

TA–W–73,571: Halliburton, Duncan, 

OK. 

TA–W–73,744: Sony Ericsson, USA, 

Research Triangle Park, NC. 

TA–W–73,834: William B. Altman, Inc., 

Fenelton, PA. 

TA–W–73,839: Duthler Ford Truck, Inc., 

Wyoming, MI. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

in cases where these petitions were not 

filed in accordance with the 

requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every 

petition filed by workers must be signed 

by at least three individuals of the 

petitioning worker group. Petitioners 

separated more than one year prior to 

the date of the petition cannot be 

covered under a certification of a 

petition under Section 223(b), and 

therefore, may not be part of a 

petitioning worker group. For one or 

more of these reasons, these petitions 

were deemed invalid. 

TA–W–72,895: Clark Construction, El 

Dorado, TX. 

TA–W–73,300: Wood-Mode, Kreamer, 

PA. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioning groups of 

workers are covered by active 

certifications. Consequently, further 

investigation in these cases would serve 

no purpose since the petitioning group 

of workers cannot be covered by more 

than one certification at a time. 

TA–W–71,317: Product Action, Toledo, 

OH. 

TA–W–73,749: Assembly and Test 

Worldwide, Inc., Shelton, CT. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of April 12, 2010 through April 23, 2010. 

Copies of these determinations may be 

requested under the Freedom of Information 

Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, 

courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure 

Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov. These 

determinations also are available on the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: May 13, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–12110 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–72,606] 

American Food and Vending Spring 

Hill, TN; Notice of Negative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated April 6, 2010, 

the International Union, United 

Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural 

Implements Workers of America, Local 

1853 (Union) requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department’s 

negative determination regarding 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was signed on March 

19, 2010. The Department’s Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on April 23, 2010 (75 

FR 21358). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of 

the law justified reconsideration of the 

decision. 

The negative determination 

applicable to workers and former 

workers at American Food and Vending, 

Spring Hill, Tennessee, was based on 

the findings that the subject firm did 

not, during the investigation period, 

shift to a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with the cafeteria 

services or vending machine services 

supplied by the workers or acquire from 

a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with the cafeteria 

services or vending machine services 

supplied by the workers; that the 

workers’ separation, or threat of 

separation, was not related to any 

increase in imports of like or directly 

competitive services or a shift in 

service/acquisition abroad; and that the 

workers did not supply a service that 

was directly used in the production of 

an article or the supply of service by a 

firm that employed a worker group that 

is eligible to apply for TAA based on the 

afore-mentioned article or service. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

Union stated that the workers of the 

subject firm should be eligible for TAA 

because they are service workers who 

provided services to General Motors, 

Spring Hill, Tennessee, and were laid 

off at the same time as workers of 

Premier Manufacturing Support 

Services (a services provider to General 

Motors, Spring Hill, Tennessee, who 

were certified eligible to apply for TAA 

on March 12, 2010, under TA–W– 

72,379). 

The difference in the determinations 

is based on the difference in the 

companies’ relationships to the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1