alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0120.                

*Date Filed:*                     May 6, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     May 27, 2010.                

*Description:*                    Application of Jet-A, LLC requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing interstate charter air transportation.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-11958 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Exhibit 32

REX Stores CorporationCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officers of REX Stores Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to their knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2007 which this
certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Stuart A. RoseStuart A. Rose

/s/ Douglas L. BruggemanDouglas L. Bruggeman

Dated: September 6, 2007



---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

March 14, 2005

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N. W.Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted tothe Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying withSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Thiscertification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K(the “Report”) accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

I, S. Marce Fuller,the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirant Corporation (the “Company”),certify that, subject to the qualifications noted below, to the best of myknowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of Mirant Corporation.

 
| Name:    | /s/ S. Marce Fuller                     |   |
|----------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Corporation and will beretained by Mirant Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

1

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

JACK DOWELL, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 16-1423 

(D.C. Nos. 1:07-CV-02002-RPM 

and 1:01-CR-00395-RPM-3) 

 (D. Colo.) 

ORDER DENYING 

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before GORSUCH, BALDOCK, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. 

Pro se Petitioner Jack Dowell was convicted by a federal jury in the early 2000s of 

destroying government property by fire in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 844(f)(1), and 

of forcibly interfering with the Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 

26 U.S.C. § 7212(a). We affirmed his convictions and sentence. See United States v. 

Dowell, 430 F.3d 1100 (10th Cir. 2005). Mr. Dowell then moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The district court denied the motion, and we 

declined to issue a certificate of appealability (COA). 

 *

This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, 

res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value 

consistent with Federal Rule Appellate Procedure 32.1 and 10th Circuit Rule 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

January 23, 2017

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

Mr. Dowell next filed a series of motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

60(b), asking the district court to set aside its order denying his § 2255 motion, to appoint 

counsel, and to hold an evidentiary hearing. The district court denied each motion. And 

we declined to issue a COA each time he appealed. Mr. Dowell now seeks review of the 

district court’s denial of his most-recent Rule 60(b) motion, in which he makes the same 

arguments that we have already rejected. We do so again here without further discussion. 

See United States v. Dowell, 604 F. App’x 702, 704 n.1 (10th Cir. 2015) (unpublished) 

(cautioning “[Mr.] Dowell that future frivolous appeals on this matter may result in 

summary disposition without discussion or an order requiring him to show cause to avoid 

appellate filing restrictions or sanctions”). 

We DENY Mr. Dowell’s application for a COA, DENY his motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis as moot, and DISMISS his appeal. 

Entered for the Court 

Carolyn B. McHugh 

Circuit Judge
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**NORTHERN      STATES FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |                                                                    |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:                            November                7, 2007                              | By:    | /s/ Fred              Abdula                                       |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   | Fred              AbdulaChairman of the Board ofDirectors and President |   |

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |                                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:                              November                  7, 2007                                | By:    | /s/ Thomas              M. Nemeth                 |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   | Thomas              M. Nemeth                          |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   | Vice              President and              Treasurer |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |                                                   |   |
Case 28 — Petition to Vacate and Modify Judgment Dismissing Appeal —

March 29.

#### Sandy River Cannel Coal Co. v. Caudell.

APPEAL FROM JOHNSON CIRCUIT COURT.

Petition Filed by Appellant to Vacate the Judgment of this Court Rendered on April 27, 1899, Dismissing the Appeal and Awarding Damages Thereon.

Motion and Petition Overruled.

Held: When it appears of record, that the time has passed, within which the transcript is required to be filed, and no extension of time has been granted, the appeal will be dismissed on motion without notice.

WALTER S. HARKINS for appellant.

J. W. M. STEWART for appellee.

Opinion of the court by

JUDGE HAZELRIGG

overruling petition AND MOTION.

When the appellant fails, to file the transcript “twenty days before the first day of the second term of the court next after the granting of the appeal, unless the court extend the time, as for good cause shown the court may do.’’ (Civ. Code, section 738), the “appeal shall be dismissed” *198(section 740). When it appears of record that the time has passed within which the transcript is (required to be filed, and no extension of time has been granted, the appeal will be dismissed, on motion, without notice. In this case the correspondence between counsel, which apparently misled counsel for appellant to believe that no motion to dismiss would be made, occurred after the time had expired for filing the record, and also after the extended time, had expired. We must adhere to the rule so long established, that application for extension of time to file transcripts must be made before, and not after, the time has expired, under the provisions of section 738 of the Code.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fedders Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Sal
Giordano, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


                                        /s/ SAL GIORDANO, JR.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Sal Giordano, Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 10, 2006


                                       31
Exhibit 10.16


 


April 13,
2009


 


Mr. Darren
R. Jamison

21211 Nordhoff Street

Chatsworth CA 91311


 


Dear
Darren:


 


As
described below, the compensation committee of the Capstone Turbine Corporation
Board of Directors has extended the time period during which you can earn the
Special Performance Bonus described in the December 1, 2006 letter
agreement that was entered into when you commenced your employment by Capstone.


 


The
letter agreement provides for a Special Performance Bonus of $100,000 to be
paid to you upon the achievement of Capstone cash flow positive for any two (2) consecutive
quarters during the first two years of your employment. On April 8, 2009,
the compensation committee extended the opportunity to earn the Special
Performance Bonus for achievement of positive cash flow for any two (2) consecutive
quarters through the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  ELIOT G. PROTSCH

  	
   

  
	
  Eliot
  G. Protsch

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman
  of the Board

  	
   

  
	
  Capstone
  Turbine Corporation
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund IV (the
Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel L. Stephenson             
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Rancon Realty Fund IV
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Exhibit 32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alfa Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|              |  |  |  |                                                         
|------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|              |  | 
|Date: 4/29/04 |  |  |  | /S/ Stephen G. Rutledge                                 
|              |  |  |  |                                                         
|              |  |  |  | Name: Stephen G. Rutledge Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Exploration Technologies (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, George Liszicasz, Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 31, 2003 | By: | /s/ GEORGE LISZICASZName:	George Liszicasz
Title:	Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)
|-------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
23











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on FormS-8 (Nos.
333-72601, 333-72599, 333-09365, 333-09375, 333-125929, 333-125931, 333-125934
and 333-130583) of FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2010
relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.








PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLPJacksonville,
      FloridaMarch
      3, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's balance sheet, statement of operations, statement of stockholders'
equity and statement of cash flows and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0000743884
<NAME>                  MacroChem Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>            1
<CURRENCY>              U.S. Dollars

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1
<CASH>                             17,428,998
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      171,177
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   17,802,589
<PP&E>                             1,260,386
<DEPRECIATION>                     828,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     18,640,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              527,506
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           224,536
<OTHER-SE>                         17,388,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       18,640,750
<SALES>                            233,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   233,971
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      4,593,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (3,933,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (3,933,514)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (3,933,514)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.18)




</TABLE>
[File No. 6111.]

#### MRS. MINNIE McKIVERGIN, Respondent, v. ERNEST W. ATWOOD, as Administrator of the Estate of Wm. E. Atwood, Deceased, Appellant.

(246 N. W. 41.)

Opinion filed December 23, 1932.

*Lemhe & Weaver,*for appellant.

*William Longer,*for respondent.

Burr, J.

Tbe defendant appeared in tbe district court “specially In tbis action, for tbe purpose only of objecting to tbe jurisdiction of above court oyer tbe person of tbe defendant, because of tbe want of process.” Tbe motion was based upon affidavits and tbe court, after reviewing these and reviewing testimony, denied tbe motion witb leave to tbe defendant to answer.

Tbis appeal is from tbe order of tbe court denying tbe “motion for a dismissal of tbe above action on the special appearance for want of process and from tbe whole thereof.”

Eespondent moves to dismiss the appeal on tbe ground that tbe order complained of by tbe defendant and sought to be reviewed on tbis appeal is not an appealable order.

Tbe motion dismissing tbe appeal must be sustained. “An order of tbe district court overruling an objection to tbe jurisdiction of the court and setting aside a special appearance is mot appealable.” Bennett v. Bennett, 54 N. D. 86, 208 N. W. 846; Baird v. Lefor, 52 N. D. 155, 160, 201 N. W. 997, 38 A.L.R. 807.

Section 7841 of the Compiled Laws enumerates tbe orders of the *74trial court wbicb may be carried to this court upon appeal, specifying five different classes. Tbe order appealed from does not involve tbe •merits of tbe action nor does it “in effect determine tbe action and prevent a judgment from wbicb an appeal might be taken.” These are tbe only classes enumerated in § 7841 wbicb, in any way, can be said to be applicable to tbe appeal. Tbe others refer to orders made after trial; to orders affecting provisional remedies, new trials or demurrer; 'to orders made without notice. As this order does not fall within any of tbe classes specified tbe motion to dismiss tbe appeal is granted.

OhbistiaNSON, Ob. J., and Nuessle, Birdzell and Buree, JJ., concur.