alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.02









               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Aetna Services Inc. (formerly Aetna Life and Casualty Company):

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on:

-    Form S-3      Nos. 333-2682 and 333-2684; and

-    Form S-8      Nos. 333-07073, 333-07077 and 333-10143.

of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. (formerly Travelers/Aetna Property Casualty
Corp.) of our report dated February 28, 1996, relating to the combined balance
sheets of The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and The Standard Fire Insurance
Company and their Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related
combined statements of income, shareholder's equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995, which report is
incorporated by reference in the annual report on Form 10-K of Travelers 
Property Casualty Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1996. Our report
refers to a change to the methods of accounting for certain investments in
debt and equity securities, workers' compensation life table indemnity reserves
and retrospectively rated reinsurance contracts in 1993.





/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
March  26, 1997
APPROVED RESOLUTIONS

MAY 18, 2010, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee approves the appointment of David Rockwell to the Board of 

Trustees of Cooper‐Hewitt, National Design Museum.  [2010.05.01] 

VOTED that on behalf of the Board of Regents, the Executive Committee recognizes the generosity 

of Warner Bros. Entertainment to the National Museum of American History and renames the 

Museum’s auditorium the Warner Bros. Theater for a period of no less than 20 years from the date 

the theater opens following its renovation.  [2010.05.02]
# Commonly Searched for Legislation (118th Congress)

**

----

XML

----

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Find Bills 

Read this guide to learn how to find copies of bills in both print and online.

### Find Votes 

View the research guide How to Find Congressional Votes for more information on finding congressional votes. 

### Legislative Keys 

Key to Versions of Printed LegislationKey to Legislative Citations
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

BOWATER INCORPORATED
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF UNAUDITED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO INFORMATION)


                                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                    ----------------------------

                                                        2002            2001
                                                    ----------------------------

EARNINGS:

Income before income taxes and minority interests     $   6.1          $  62.6

Add: Fixed charges from below                            46.3             41.7
Less: Capitalized interest
                                                          1.5              3.0
                                                    ----------------------------

                                                      $  50.9          $ 101.3
                                                    ============================

FIXED CHARGES:

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized            41.8             35.2
Capitalized interest                                      1.5              3.0
Estimate of interest within rental expense                0.7              0.7
Amortized premium and discounts related to
  indebtedness                                            2.3              2.8
                                                    ----------------------------

                                                      $  46.3          $  41.7
                                                    ============================

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                       1.1x             2.4x
                                                    ============================
# States in the Senate

**

----

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SEAN A. FINAN AND MAURA K. FINAN

AS TRUSTEES OF THE FINAN FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST,

Respondents

v.

PIKE COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 320 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Arthur Goossen, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. Charles S. Codington, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                    5
<LEGEND>   
     The financial data schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from the form 10-Q of Howell Corporation for the six months
     ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
     such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    1123
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             7188
<ALLOWANCES>                                               150
<INVENTORY>                                                 30
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         11340
<PP&E>                                                  451015
<DEPRECIATION>                                          279481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          202482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    40559
<BONDS>                                                 107000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                690
<COMMON>                                                  5472
<OTHER-SE>                                               44814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            202482
<SALES>                                                  26534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         26534
<CGS>                                                    20117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            20117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         66118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        5434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (68142)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (23120)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (45022)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             (59)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (45081)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (8.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (8.46)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-09-00230-CV

$1,711 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-1538-4, 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronald Clayton Bible filed a notice of appeal with the District Clerk on July 17, 

2009 regarding an adverse judgment by the trial court in a forfeiture case. A few days 

later, on July 20, 2009, Bible filed a document indicating that he no longer wished to 

appeal the trial court’s decision.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Further, absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of this Court must collect filing 

fees at the time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to 

TEX. R. APP. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See 
$1,711 v. State Page 2

also TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 

51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2008). Under the 

circumstances of this proceeding, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off 

all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the 

accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Bible.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 5, 2009

[CV06]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# Date and Time: 

Tuesday, May 18, 2010. 11 a.m.-12:15 p.m.

# Place: 

Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20237.

# Closed Meeting: 

The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-11778 Filed 5-13-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00314

- CR

JUSTIN S. MATTHEWS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- 1351

- C1

ORDER

Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed November 2 , 2016
#### James H. Ryan and Duncan Thompson, Respondents, *v.*Francesco Pistone, Appellant.

Novation— *essentials of.*

To constitute a novation there must be a mutual agreement among three or more parties whereby a debtor, in consideration of being discharged from his liability to his original creditor, contracts a new obligation in favor of a new creditor. Facts considered which do not constitute a novation.

Appeal by the defendant, Francesco Pistone, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of "Westchester on the 31st day of March, 1894, upon the verdict of a jury rendered after a trial at the West-chester Circuit, and also from an order bearing date the 13th day ■of March, 1894, and entered in the "Westchester county clerk’s ■office, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

*Clarence D.*Jones, for the appellant.

*Ralph*Hickox, for the respondents.

Brown, P. J.:

The, exception taken to the denial of the motion to dismiss the complaint must be sustained.

It appears that one Ceburre entered into a contract with the defendant to erect a house. Ceburre sublet the roofing and plumbing to the plaintiffs, and there was a balance unpaid for their work. 'The plaintiff Ryan testified to a conversation with the defendant, in which defendant orally agreed to pay the plaintiffs’ bill, and deduct it from the amount due to Ceburre. It does not appear that Ceburre consented to this arrangement, or was consulted about it. The testimony was that he was present at the conversation, but said nothing. Thereafter defendant paid plaintiffs $200, and this action was brought to recover the balance. The case presents nothing more than an oral agreement without consideration, to pay the debt of another. To constitute a novation there must be a mutual agreement among three or more parties, whereby a debtor in consideration of being discharged from his liability to his original creditor contracts a new obligation in favor of a new creditor. Ceburre *79could not be held to have discharged the defendant, from the mere fact that he was present at the conversation between Ryan and the defendant. That fact did not estop him from enforcing his claim against the defendant. If he had sued defendant for the balance due him upon his contract the day following the conversation, defendant could not successfully have pleaded an oral agreement to pay the plaintiffs. *(Kelly*v. *Roberts,*40 N. Y. 432.)

But if the agreement was not binding upon Oeburre the moment it was made it did not become so by anything that occurred thereafter.

The case does not fall within the doctrine of *Lawrence*v. *Fox*(20 N. Y. 268).

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

Pratt, J., concurred; Dykman, J., not sitting.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM NOVA
CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         630,000              40,326,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,508,000              18,854,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   440,000               2,707,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,080,000                 857,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,537,000              60,490,000
<PP&E>                                      12,437,000              16,384,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,034,000               6,172,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,001,000             107,705,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,246,000              21,115,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       114,000                 288,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,903,000              84,594,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,001,000             107,705,000
<SALES>                                    129,035,000             265,829,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           129,035,000             265,829,000
<CGS>                                      100,375,000             207,595,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              100,375,000             207,595,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,871,000              46,329,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,959,000               (126,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                830,000              12,031,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,057,000)               4,764,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,887,000               7,267,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24                     .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24                     .25
        

</TABLE>
EX-4.3









EXHIBIT 4.3




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form F-8 of Silvercorp Metals Inc.
(the “Company”) of our report dated June 3, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements
of the Company, which appears in the Annual Report of the Company on Form 40-F for the year ended
March 31, 2009.




/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

June 15, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2394 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2394

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize indirect 
                  graduate medical education payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2000

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Helms, Mr. 
   Kerrey, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. 
 Johnson, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Kerry, Mr. DeWine, 
 Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cleland, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Levin, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
   Wellstone, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Mikulski, and Mr. Specter) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize indirect 
                  graduate medical education payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teaching Hospital Preservation Act 
of 2000''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF REDUCTION OF INDIRECT GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION 
              PAYMENTS.

    Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(d)(5)(B)(ii)) (as amended by section 111(a) of the Medicare, 
Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
1501A-329), as enacted into law by section 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 
106-113) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (IV), by adding ``and'' at the end; and
            (2) by striking subclauses (V) and (VI) and inserting the 
        following:
                            ``(V) on or after October 1, 2000, `c' is 
                        equal to 1.6.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed March 26, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00174

- CV

____________ TAIMOOR GILANI , Appellant

V. RIVER PARK CROSSING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19

- DCV

- 265038



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed February 28, 2020. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before April 10, 2020

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be
dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.