alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1









Exhibit 10.1




May 21, 2009




Keith Kolerus

Chairman Agilysys, Inc.

28925 Fountain Parkway

Solon, Ohio 44139




Dear Keith,



Please accept this letter as notification of my resignation from the Board of Directors of
Agilysys, effective immediately. It has been my sincere pleasure to hold this distinguished
position, and I regret my opportunity to serve the company and its shareholders was so brief.
Unfortunately, I can no longer serve the mutual best interest of both my company and Agilysys.



My experience with Agilysys and its Board has been nothing short of excellent, and I wish to
express my appreciation for the welcome extended to me. I wish you all the best of success and
prosperity in the future.




Sincerely,




/s/ Steve Tepedino



Steve Tepedino
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Kevin M. Cameron, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Emdeon Corporation; and  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.  3. *[Intentionally omitted]**  4. *[Intentionally omitted]**  5. *[Intentionally omitted]**Date: April 30, 2007                                                                   /s/ Kevin M. Cameron   Kevin M. Cameron   *Chief Executive Officer*(Principal executive officer)    * *Paragraphs 3 through 5, omitted here, are included in Exhibit 31.1 to the Annual Report onForm 10-K filed by Emdeon Corporation on March 1, 2007.*
"-Th. n. ((- 5 

### 7 1 C, i
- 1., L .J C11i L u
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

CODYLARSON,

Petitioner,

v. JIM SALMONSEN, Warden, MONTANA STATE PRISON,

Respondent. OP 22-0161 

# FILED APR 12 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court Stato of Montana ORDER

Cody Larson petitions this Court for habeas corpus relief, indicating that his sentence is illegal because he was sentenced to the Department ofCorrections (DOC) for morethan fiveyears withnone ofit suspended. Herequests his immediaterelease. Larson is incarcerated in the Montana State Prison. Larson provides one paragraph in his Petition and no supporting documents. He states: Theprison record department isnotresponding/cooperatingwithrequests for supporting documents in Cause No. BDC-10-470A, which supports my claim in illegal incarceration/sentencing. It's been over 30 days in which these requests were made. We point out that the MSP Record Department does not give copies ofsentencing judgments to offenders. An inmate must request a copy from the sentencing court. The MSP Record Department may give a copy of a sentence calculation upon proper request from an inmate. Available electronic records indicate that in October 2011, the Eighth Judicial District Court sentenced Larson to the DOC for fifteen years, all suspended, for felony sexual intercoursewithout consent. TheDistrict Court awarded 308 days ofcredit fortime served. In 2014, Larson violated his probationary terms ofhis suspended sentence. The District Court re-imposed his fifteen-year sentence to the DOC, with all time suspended, 04/12/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0161

### and awarded 347daysofjail timecredit. InFebruary 2015,theDistrict Courthelda second

evidentiary and dispositional hearing on Larson's violations. The court accepted Larson's true answers to violations ofthree conditions, and the court sentenced him to the DOC for a fifteen-year term. The court awarded 442 days ofcredit for time served. Larson has not demonstrated an illegal sentence. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Pursuant to § 45-5-503(2), MCA, a court may sentence an offender to prison for term of twenty years for felony sexual intercourse without consent. The District Court has statutory authority, upon revocation ofthe original sentence, to impose any sentence that is not longer than the originally imposed sentence. Section 46-18-203(7)(a)(iii), MCA. His original fifteen-year sentence was entirely suspended. Following two reports of violations, however, the court twice revoked his suspended sentence, imposing a sentence that was not any longer. Larson cannot challenge his sentence upon revocation through the remedy ofa writ ofhabeas corpus. Section 46-22-101(2), MCA. Larson is not entitled to release or habeas corpus reliefhere. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Larson's Petition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel ofrecord and to Cody Larson personally. DATED this day ofApril, 2022.

ChiefJustice



# S24Ai 44,

2

### 1 <; ), Justices

3
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.01
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    Date: April 30, 2007
    /s/ John C. GoffJohn C. GoffChief Executive Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 32.01
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    Date: April 30, 2007
    /s/ Jane E. ModyJane E. ModyManaging Director, Chief Financial Officer
# States in the Senate | Nevada Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

 1. Elected Dec. 15, 1864. Sworn into office on Feb. 1, 1865.

 2. Elected on Dec. 16, 1864. Sworn into office on Feb. 1, 1865.

 3. Elected for the term beginning Jan. 3, 1975, subsequently appointed to the remainder of the term expiring Jan. 3, 1975.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-45763) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-45761) pertaining to the
Management Development and Recognition Plan and Trust Agreement of Eagle
BancGroup, Inc. (the 'Company') of our report dated January 17, 1997, with
respect to the  consolidated financial statements of the Company included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 27, 1998
1Oliver requests that his case be exchanged and transferred for refiling pursuant to

Rule 330(e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 330(e), however, does not apply. 

NO. 07-04-0260-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

SEPTEMBER 2, 2004

______________________________

ELLERY CORNELIUS OLIVER, APPELLANT

V.

ZONIA A. SCOTT, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 91,428; HONORABLE PAMELA C. SIRMON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant Ellery Cornelius Oliver’s motion by which he

requests we dismiss this appeal.1

 Oliver, an inmate proceeding pro se and informa
2

pauperis, originally filed suit against appellee Zonia A. Scott in justice court where his claim

was dismissed pursuant to chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

After his appeal to the County Court At Law No. 2 was dismissed for lack of prosecution,

he appealed to this Court.

In his motion, Oliver indicates a desire to re-file his claim. Thus, because the

dismissal of his claim in county court was not a ruling on the merits, we dismiss this appeal

without prejudice. Cf. Hughes v. Massey, 65 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex.App.–Beaumont 2001,

no pet.) (holding that it was error to dismiss with prejudice an inmate’s suit for failure to

comply with the rules governing the filing of in forma pauperis suits).

Without passing on the merits of this appeal, pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal without

prejudice. Having dismissed the appeal at Oliver’s request no motion for rehearing will be

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice
Order entered October 22 , 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00221-CR

No. 05-13-00222-CR

No. 05-13-00240-CR

VICTOR JOEL SUAREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F09-41419-K, F06-45426-K & F06-45427-K

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the March 12, 2014 motion of 

Kathleen Walsh for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk 

of the Court to remove Kathleen Walsh as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the 

Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to Victor Joel 

Suarez, TDCJ # 1838941, Bradshaw Unit, P.O. Box 9000, Henderson, Texas, 75653.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6997]

Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Nayif Bin-Muhammad al-Qahtani and also known as Nayef Bin Muhammad al-Qahtani, also known as Nayif Muhammad al-Qahtani, also known as Nayf Mohammed al-Qahtani, also known as Naif Mohammad Said al-Qahtani Alkodri, also known as Naif Mohammed Saeed al-Kodari al-Qahtani, also known as Nayef Bin Mohamed al-Khatani, also known as Mohammed Naif al-Khatani, also known as Nayef bin Mohamed al-Khatany, also known as Al-Qahtani Abohemem, also known as Abi Hamam, also known as Abu-Hamam, also known as Abu-Humam, also known as Abu-Hammam, also known as Abu Hammam al-Qahtani committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

                    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that “prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,” I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render                           ( print page 26316)                        ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.                

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register.**

 Dated: April 6, 2010.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State,

Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010–11192 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710–10–P
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Success Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2000 included in
the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Success Bancshares, Inc. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-42615) pertaining to the Success Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, 1990, 1992 and 1993 Executive Officer Stock Option Agreements
and the 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 11, 2000,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
reference.

/s/  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Schaumburg, Illinois
March 24, 2000
#### Laura J. Neal, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Scott A. Neal, appellant and cross-appellee.

470 N.W.2d 803

Filed June 21, 1991.

No. 89-391.

James R. Place, of Place and Rasmussen, on brief, for appellant.

Scott A. Neal, pro se.

Ronald E. Frank and Clark J. Vanskiver, of Sodoro, Daly & Sodoro, for appellee.

Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a dissolution of marriage decree dated March 31, 1989, entered by the district court for Douglas County. The sole issue raised by the parties on appeal and cross-appeal is the amount of alimony awarded the appellee spouse. Awards of alimony are initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record establishes that the trial court has abused its discretion. *Dinovo v. Dinovo, ante*p. 285, 470 N.W.2d 174 (1991). Reviewing the judgment of the trial court de novo on the record and finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the judgment. See *Schulze v. Schulze, ante*p. 81, 469 N.W.2d 139 (1991).

Affirmed.
No. 1,674.

#### CLARK et al., Respondents, *v.*GRAND OPERA HOUSE CO. et al., Appellants.

*Appeal from District*Court, *Silver Bow County.*

On the application of J. 0. Bender.

Decided October 22, 1901.

Per Curiam.

— The application of J. O. Bender to be made a party defendant and appellant herein, and for a stay of proceedings, is denied. (Mr. Justice Pigott dissents, being inclined to the opinion that, upon the present showing, the application should be granted under proper limitations and restrictions. )

Rehearing denied November 5, 1901.

On the application of A. Eustis.

Decided December 3, 1901.

Per Curiam.

— The application of A. Eustis, petitioner, for leave of court to appear and be heard by counsel in this cause, and for an order permitting him to give an undertaking to stay the enforcement of the judgment appealed from, having heretofore been submitted to, and taken under advisement by, the court: Now, upon due consideration, the court being fully advised in the premises, it is ordered: That the application be, *550and the same is, hereby denied, upon the ground that the petitioner does not appear to be a shareholder in appellant Grand Opera House Company, the court deeming it unnecessary to decide the question of whether or not, if he were shown to' be a shareholder, ihe other matters exhibited - would entitle the petitioner to the order prayed for, ihe ground assigned being sufficient for the disposition of the application.

*Mr. Charles*O’Donnell, and *Mr. J. L. Wines,*for Appellants.

*Mr. T. J. Walsh,*for J. 0. Bender.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 10 , 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00234

- CV

Gary Newton, Appellant

v.

Kenneth Williams, Lesia W. Jones, John H. Gomez, and Benita Gomez, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF B ASTROP COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE , JUSTICES GOODWIN AN D FIELD AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

–

OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment s igned by the tr i a l court on February 24, 2016 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

that portion of the judgment denying appellant’s request for declaratory and injunctive relief

.

Theref ore, the Court reverses that portion of the trial court’s judgment denying appellant’s

request for declaratory and injunctive relief and remands the case to the trial court for further

proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion . The Court affirms the remainder of the trial

court’s judgment. Each party shall bear the costs of appeal incurred by that party , both in this

Court and the court below.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

# Time and Date:

1 p.m.-5 p.m., June 29, 2010 (Closed).

# Place:

Teleconference.

# Status:

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

# Matters to be Discussed:

The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Conducting Public Health Research in Kenya (U01)(Panel A),” FOA GH10-003.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Susan Stanton, D.D.S., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D74, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-4640.

The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Dated: May 6, 2010.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2010-12174 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Commercial Bancshares, Inc.;
 2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 c)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; andd)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
 03/28/2007
 /s/ Scott A. Oboy[Signature]Scott A. Oboy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer