alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from NS Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three
and six month periods ended March 29, 1997, included in the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such condensed consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745026
<NAME> NS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,744
<SECURITIES>                                    18,057
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                       854
<INVENTORY>                                     64,221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,552
<PP&E>                                         274,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,974
<BONDS>                                        163,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,829
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,920
<SALES>                                        216,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,277
<CGS>                                          188,197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                       876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,418
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,418
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
Cite as 2014 Ark. 100

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CV-14-107

ABRAHAM GRANT

 PETITIONER

v.

VERA REYNOLDS, LINCOLN COUNTY

CIRCUIT CLERK 

 RESPONDENT

Opinion Delivered February 27, 2014

PRO SE MOTION FOR RULE ON

CLERK [LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT

COURT, NO. UNKNOWN]

MOTION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

On January 22, 2014, petitioner Abraham Grant tendered to this court a pro se motion

for rule on the Lincoln County Circuit Clerk, alleging that the circuit clerk had failed to perform

some duty. As the motion pertained to the circuit clerk, and not the clerk of this court, it was

returned to petitioner so that he could proceed with it in circuit court. See Willis v. Circuit Clerk

of Sebastian County, 2009 Ark. 515 (per curiam) (A motion for rule on circuit clerk alleging a

failure of the clerk to perform a duty was returned to be filed in the circuit court in which the

respondent was serving as circuit clerk.). On January 23, 2014, petitioner tendered an

amendment to the motion for rule on circuit clerk that was also returned to him.

Now before us is petitioner’s pro se motion for rule on the clerk of this court, asking that

we direct our clerk to file the motion and amended motion here. The motion for rule on our

clerk was not accompanied by a certified record of any proceeding in circuit court. 

The motion is denied. The circuit court has jurisdiction to consider a claim that its clerk

should perform a particular duty. See Willis, 2009 Ark. 515. Petitioner has failed to establish that

there is any basis for this court to assume jurisdiction of the matter.

Motion denied. 

Abraham Grant, pro se petitioner.

No response.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,180
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             300
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    187,138
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        284,546
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 503,393
<DEPOSITS>                                     346,943
<SHORT-TERM>                                    73,319
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,632
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,784
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 503,393
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,516
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,912
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   128
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,556
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,489
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,067
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,649
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,649
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,013
<EPS-BASIC>                                       $.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.06
<LOANS-NON>                                        669
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,181
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,368
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      163
<RECOVERIES>                                        70
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,275
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,425
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,850


</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 23, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00741-CV

IN RE PRAC-II, LLC AND STAR REALTY, INC., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-74237

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 20, 2016, relators PRAC-II, LLC and Star Realty, Inc. filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 

(West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to 

compel the Honorable Robert Schaffer, presiding judge of the 152nd District Court 

of Harris County, to vacate his (1) September 2, 2016 order denying relators’ 
2

motion to quash depositions, for protective order, and for case management order; 

and (2) September 6, 2016 order granting, in part, real parties in interest’s motion 

to compel. 

Relators have not shown that they are entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny 

relators’ emergency motion to stay discovery orders. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Brown.
*

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1994

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States 

* District Court for the District

v. * of Minnesota.

*

Jose Cervantes, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 7, 2006

Filed: February 8, 2006 

___________

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Cervantes appeals the 120-month concurrent prison sentences the district

court*

 imposed after Cervantes pleaded guilty to a drug-conspiracy charge and a

charge for aiding and abetting drug possession with intent to distribute. Cervantes

argues the court erroneously assessed a total of three criminal-history points, thus

rendering him ineligible for safety-valve relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. 
-2-

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court’s

calculation was correct. Contrary to Cervantes's argument, the district court properly

assessed two criminal-history points because it is undisputed a valid warrant for a

probation violation existed at the time Cervantes committed the crimes in this case.

See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(m) (defendant who commits instant offense while, e.g.,

probation violation warrant is outstanding is deemed under a criminal justice sentence

for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d)). Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
v150341_10-81 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.81
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 12181 and # 12182]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South Dakota (FEMA—1915—DR), dated 05/13/2010. *Incident:*
                         Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         03/10/2010 And Continuing.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         05/13/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/12/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/14/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/13/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Aurora, Beadle, Brown, Brule, Buffalo, Charles Mix, Clark, Clay, Codington, Day, Edmunds, Faulk, Grant, Hamlin, Hanson, Hutchinson, Hyde, Jerauld, Kingsbury, Lyman, Marshall, Mccook, Mcpherson, Miner, Roberts, Sanborn, Spink, Sully, Turner, Union. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 121816 and for economic injury is 121826. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-12077 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4700 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4700

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
              on the deduction for student loan interest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2014

 Mr. Gardner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 
              on the deduction for student loan interest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR STUDENT LOAN 
              INTEREST.

    (a) In General.--Section 221(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``the amount determined'' and all that 
follows and inserting ``$5,000.''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Subsection (f) of section 221 of such 
Code is amended by--
            (1) redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as paragraphs (2) 
        and (3), respectively, and inserting before paragraph (2) (as 
        so redesignated) the following new paragraph:
            ``(1) Dollar limitation.--In the case of any taxable year 
        beginning after 2015, the $5,000 amount in subsection (b)(1) 
        shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2014' for `calendar year 1992' in 
                subparagraph (B) thereof.'',
            (2) in paragraph (2) (as so redesignated), by striking ``In 
        general'' in the heading thereof and inserting ``Limitation 
        based on modified adjusted gross income'', and
            (3) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated)--
                    (A) by striking ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting 
                ``paragraph (1) or (2)'', and
                    (B) by inserting ``($100 in the case of any 
                adjustment under paragraph (1))'' after ``$5,000'' both 
                places it appears.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
#### Frederick W. Woeckener v. Richmond Light and Railroad Company.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 3/1/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff-Appellee, )

) No. 95-6225

v. ) (D.C. No. CR-92-108-T)

) (W.D. Okla.)

PABLO LUIS GOMEZ, )

)

Defendant-Appellant. )

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, MCKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Mr. Pablo Luis Gomez, a pro se prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his
-2-

second motion seeking post conviction relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Mr. Gomez

contends he is entitled to (1) a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and

(2) an evidentiary hearing to obtain a ruling to his objections to the presentence report.

Mr. Gomez did not file a direct appeal. He first raised his objection in a motion

for post conviction relief. “The failure of a defendant to present an issue on direct appeal

bars the defendant from raising such an issue in a § 2255 motion . . . unless good cause is

shown.” United States v. Khan, 835 F.2d 749, 753-54 (10th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 487

U.S. 1222 (1988). We have carefully reviewed the record and Mr. Gomez’s arguments

on appeal, and we hold that he has failed to show good cause. Accordingly, we affirm

substantially for the reasons given by the district court. The mandate shall issue

forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Repository for Mouse Models for 
Cytogenetic Disorders.
    Date: February 16, 2010.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To provide concept review of proposed concept review.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 
Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304. (301) 435-
6680. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7d4ccc6c9c3c6d4c6e7cac6cecb89c9cecf89c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ccbfa7ada2a8adbfad8ca1ada5a0e2a2a5a4e2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 14, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-1222 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of AdvanSource Biomaterials Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael F. Adams, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: July 28, 2015

 

 

 

/s/ Michael F. Adams

 

Michael F. Adams

 

Chief Executive Officer and President

 

This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q, Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|