alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RUDY ABARCA,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00038-CR

Appeal from

346th District Court

Of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150D04057)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right 

of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial 

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than 

March 31, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of February, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
exv10w17






Exhibit 10.17




SUMMARY OF OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



In September 2008, the Board of Directors of IXYS Corporation (the “Board”) approved annual cash
compensation, which is paid in periodic increments, for the directors of IXYS Corporation that are
not employees on the following basis:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer for each Director
	 	$	40,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainer for the Chairmen of the
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	10,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Nominating Committee
	 	$	6,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainer for the other members of the
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	7,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	5,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Nominating Committee
	 	$	2,000	 





In January 2009, the Board reduced future payments of the foregoing retainers by 10% in light of
economic conditions.



Directors do not receive fees for attending each meeting.
Lloyd Douglas Enterprises 

LLC dba River City Care 

Center & Steve 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 18, 2014

No. 04-14-00221-CV

Comfort ROBERTS,

Appellant

v.

LLOYD DOUGLAS ENTERPRISES LLC dba River City Care Center & Steve Robinson,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-12260

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellees have filed a Motion for Sanctions raising several allegations about appellant’s 

conduct in this appeal. Appellant, Mr. Comfort Roberts who is representing himself pro se, 

responded denying the allegations.

Appellees’ Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. However, Mr. Roberts is cautioned that 

although he is acting pro se in this appeal, this court expects him to follow the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, including, but not limited to, Rule 9 (“Documents Generally”), Rule 10 

(“Motions in Appellate Courts”), and Rule 38 (“Requisites of Briefs”). Failure to comply with 

the Rules of Appellate Procedure may result in a pleading being stricken or this appeal being 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9, 42.3(c).

Mr. Roberts is reminded that his appellate brief is due no later than August 28, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Robert C. Hagerty,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Polycom, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Polycom, Inc.



|                  |  |        |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|February 29, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/    ROBERT C.
HAGERTY             
|                  |  | Name:  |  | Robert C. Hagerty                    
|                  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



Certification of the Senior Vice
President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Michael R. Kourey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Polycom, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Polycom, Inc.



|                  |  |        |  |                                                                              
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|February 29, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/    MICHAEL R.
KOUREY                                                     
|                  |  | Name:  |  | Michael R. Kourey                                                            
|                  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert B. Wagner,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                               /s/  Robert B. Wagner
                                               ----------------------------
                                                    Robert B. Wagner
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    March 14, 2003
Exhibit
23.2










CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-138127 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 28, 2008, except for Note
19, as to
which the date is March 4, 2008,relating to the financial statements,
financial statement schedules and internal control over financial reporting of
AmCOMP Incorporated appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AmCOMP
Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2007.




/s/
JOHNSON LAMBERT & CO., LLP




JACKSONVILLE,
FLORIDA




February
28, 2008, except
for Note 19, as to
which the date is March 4, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2563 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2563

             To reduce temporarily the duty on Baytron C-R.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2000

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To reduce temporarily the duty on Baytron C-R.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON BAYTRON C-R.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new subheading:

      

``    9902.38.15    A certain         Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     catalytic                                                               31/2003          ''
                     preparation                                                                               .
                     based on Iron
                     (III)
                     toluenesulfonat
                     e (CAS No.
                     77214-82-5)
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     3815.90.50)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Attiazaz "Bob" Din, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of En Pointe Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

Dated:
December 23, 2002

| |  |                                                                                                      
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ ATTIAZAZ "BOB" DINAttiazaz "Bob" Din
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer

---

QuickLinks
NO. 07-02-0147-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JUNE 21, 2002

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.A.; T.L.A.; J.B.A. AND L.S.A., MINOR CHILDREN

		_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2001-513,986; HONORABLE DRUE FARMER, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	On May 20, 2002, the appellant filed a Motion to Withdraw Notice of Appeal averring that he no longer wished to pursue the appeal and that the appeal should be dismissed.

	Without passing on the merits of the case, the appellant’s  Motion to Dismiss Appeal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  All costs are assessed to the parties incurring the same.  Having dismissed the appeal at the appellant’s request and because the appellee is not opposed to such a request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

							Phil Johnson

Do not publish.					    Justice
# Visiting the Capitol

**

----

Your visit to the historic U.S. Capitol begins as you enter the Capitol Visitor Center—the main entrance to the U.S. Capitol.  Through films, exhibits, and tours, you will learn about how Congress works, how this magnificent building was built, and how citizens can participate in this extraordinary experiment called representative democracy.

LOCATION AND HOURS

Visitor Hours & Information

SAFETY & SECURITY

Prohibited Items

Emergency Evacuation Information

FREQUENTLY REQUESTED INFORMATION

Getting to the Capitol

Accessibility Services

**More information on planning your visit is available on the Capitol Visitor Center's website.**

|   |
|--------|

        -  Officers & Staff 
        -            -  Vice President 
          -  President Pro Tempore 
          -  Secretary of the Senate 
          -  Sergeant at Arms 
          -  Party Secretaries 
          -  Chaplain 
          -  Committee & Office Staff 
          -  Pages 
        -  Powers & Procedures 
        -            -  Censure 
          -  Declarations of War 
          -  Expulsion 
          -  Filibuster & Cloture 
          -  Impeachment 
          -  Investigations 
          -  Nominations 
          -  Rules 
          -  Treaties 
          -  Voting 
        -  Origins & Foundations 
        -            -  The Senate & the Constitution 
          -  Electing & Appointing Senators 
          -  Committee System 
          -  Idea of the Senate 
          -  Parties & Leadership 
        -  Traditions & Symbols 
        -  Historic Buildings & Spaces 
        -            -  The Capitol 
          -  Senate Chamber 
          -  Historic Rooms 
          -  Senate Office Buildings 
          -  Congressional Meeting Places 
          -  Past Senate Chambers 
        -  Oral History Project 
        -  Historical Highlights 
        -            -  1787-1800 
          -  1801-1850 
          -  1851-1877 
          -  1878-1920 
          -  1921-1940 
          -  1941-1963 
          -  1964-present 
        -  Senate Stories Blog 
        -  Research Tools 

### Tips 

Tips for Visiting the Capitol

Capitol Etiquette

Respecting Capitol Art

Senate Dining Areas

### Door Access Notice 

Senate Office Buildings Door Map (In Session/Out Session)US Capitol Building Door Map and Hours of Operation

### U.S. Senate Office Buildings 

Russell Senate Office Building

Dirksen Senate Office Building

Hart Senate Office Building
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                          WYNDHAM HOTEL CORPORATION
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    PRO FORMA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)




<TABLE>
<S>                                             <C>          <C>         <C>
Pro forma earnings before federal
   income taxes                                                          18,730
Pro forma fixed charges -
   Interest expense                                          13,550
   Amortization of capitalized financing fees:
      Senior subordinated debt                     300
      Revolving Credit Facility                    363          663
                                                ------
   Rent:
      Actual for the year                       10,318
      GHALP 4 months pro forma                   4,533
                                                ------
                                                14,851
                                                x  1/3        4,950
                                                ------       ------
         Total pro forma fixed charges                                   19,163
                                                                         ------
                                                                         37,893
                                                                         ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                         1.98
                                                                         ======

</TABLE>
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 15

- 00107

- CR

SAM LAMAR BUSBY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR1401047

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Sam Lamar Busby was convicted by a jury of the offense of harassment and was sentenced

by the trial court to 180 days’ incarceration. After punishment was assessed, Busby signed a

waiver of his right to appeal. Further, the trial court’s certification of Busby’s right to appeal,

which was signed by Busby, indicates that Busby waived his right to appeal.

Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure, this Court is required

to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s certification correctly indicates th at there is

no right of appeal or that the right of appeal has been waived. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).

By letter dated July 15, 2015, we notified Busby of this potential defect in our jurisdiction

and afforded him an opportunity to respond. No response has been filed.

In light of the foregoing, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: August 2 5 , 2015

Date Decided: August 2 6 , 2015

Do Not Publish
Order entered August 1 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00445
- CV RICHMAN TRUSTS, A TEXAS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, MARC H. RICHMAN, AND HARVEY A. RICHMAN , Appell ant s
V. RALPH LUBINS TIME, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JUDITH SHARON RICHMAN, DECEASED, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE RICHMAN 2008, ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. DC
- 19
- 15404

O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this case is past due. By postcard dated June 15,
2022 , we notified Antionette Reagor, Official Court Reporter for the 68th Judic ial District Court, that the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to file the reporter’s record within thirty days. To date, the r ep orter ’ s record has not beenfiled nor has Ms. Reagor corresponded with the Court regarding the status o f the

repo rter ’ s record.
Accor dingly, we ORDER Ms. Reagor to file , within TWENTY DAYS of
the date of t his or der, either (1) the reporter’s record; ( 2) written verification that appellant s ha ve not requested the record; or (3) w ritten verification that appellant s
ha ve not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record

. We notify appellant s that if we receive verification they have not paid for or made
arrangement

s to pay for the reporter’s record, we will order the a ppeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c)

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send c opi es of this order to:
Honorable Martin Hoffman Presiding Judge 68th Judicial District Court
Anto inette Reagor Official Court Reporter 68th Judici al District Court All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
exv10w59






Exhibit 10.59




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
	 	www.netapp.com	 	919 476 5750  Tel	 	7301 Kit Creek Road
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	Research Triangle Park, NC
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	27709






NOTICE OF TERMINATION




April 23, 2009




J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, as Agent to the Credit Agreement referred to below




Attention: Bank Loan Syndications Department




Ladies and Gentlemen:



The undersigned, NetApp, Inc., refers to the Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of October 5, 2007
(as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit
Agreement”, the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the
undersigned, certain Lenders parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Agent, and hereby gives
you notice, irrevocably, pursuant to Section 2.09 of the Credit Agreement that the undersigned
hereby requests a termination of the Credit Agreement effective as of April 24, 2009.




Very truly yours,




NetApp, Inc.




By /s/
Ingemar Lanevi                                                              
         

Title: Vice President & Corporate Treasurer




Legal Reference
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 41072 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE MARTIN GARAY

- ACEVEDO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 485

- 1

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Martin Garay

- Acevedo pleaded guilty to one count of attempted illegal reentry after a previous deportation and received a within

- guidelines sentence of 24 months in prison. On appeal, Garay

- Acevedo argues only that the written judgment i ncorrectly st ates that his offens e of conviction is illegal reentry rather than attempted illegal reentry. He requests a remand to correct the judgment. The conviction and sentence imposed by the district court are

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 18, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-41072 Document: 00512668977 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2014No. 13

- 41072

AFFIRMED. However, we REMAND to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment to reflect the correct offense of conviction.

2 Case: 13-41072 Document: 00512668977 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2014
Order entered January 7, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01329-CR

No. 05-12-01336-CR

LAKENDRICK DUMANDRE HAYDEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F09-62407-R, F11-61298-R

ORDER

On November 6, 2013, this Court ordered appellant to file his brief by December 16, 

2013. We further warned that if the brief was not filed by that date, we would order appellant’s 

appointed attorney J. Daniel Oliphant removed and would order that new counsel be appointed. 

To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER J. Daniel Oliphant removed as appellant’s appointed attorney 

in these cases.

We ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in these appeals 

and to transmit the order appointing counsel to this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of 

this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Mark Stoltz, Presiding Judge, 265th Judicial District Court; J. Daniel Oliphant; and 

the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeals

shall be reinstated fifteen days from the date of this order or when the order appointing new 

counsel is received.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE