alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 20.5

                         [ERNST & YOUNG LLP LETTERHEAD]


                         Report of Independent Auditors

Board of Directors
WFS Financial Inc


We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
consolidated statement of financial condition of WFS Financial Inc and
Subsidiaries (WFS) as of December 31, 1996 and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended, and have issued our report thereon dated January 28, 1997.

In connection with our audit nothing came to our attention that caused us to
believe that WFS failed to comply with the terms, covenants, provisions or
conditions of either the Pooling and Servicing Agreements for WFS Financial
Auto Loans, Inc. dated June 1, 1993, September 1, 1993, December 1, 1993,
March 1, 1994, May 1, 1994, August 1, 1994, October 1, 1994, January 1, 1995,
March 1, 1995, June 1, 1995, September 1, 1995 or December 1, 1995, or the Sale
and Servicing Agreements for WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc. dated March 1,
1996, June 1, 1996, September 1, 1996 or December 1, 1996 between Bankers Trust
Company and WFS insofar as they relate to accounting and auditing matters.
However, it should be noted that our audit was not directed primarily toward
obtaining a knowledge of noncompliance.

This report is intended for the use and information of the Board of Directors,
management and Bankers Trust Company and should not be used for any other
purpose.



                                      /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

January 28, 1997
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of Columbia Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Roger L. Christensen, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.Date: March 17, 2008   /s/ ROGER L. CHRISTENSEN   Roger L. Christensen  President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40517 Summary Calendar

LEE-AUNDRY LAMON GORDON, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:01-CV-334

- - - - - - - - - - December 27, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lee-Aundry Lamon Gordon appeals the district court’s denial of his claim in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition that counsel was ineffective when he elicited Gordon’s confession to the offense of aggravated robbery. Gordon argues that the entire trial strategy of seeking a conviction for the lesser included offense of attempted aggravated robbery was destroyed by this confession. The record does not support this contention. On direct appeal,No. 02-40517 -2- Gordon argued that he was entitled to a jury instruction for the lesser included offense of attempted aggravated robbery. The state court determined that because the evidence supported the jury’s determination that he had committed aggravated robbery, he was not entitled to such an instruction. Thus, Gordon’s argument that he was prejudiced by not being able to make a case for attempted aggravated robbery is meritless. Gordon has not shown that but for counsel’s eliciting a judicial confession, the result of the proceedings would have been different. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). Moreover, the record indicates that counsel was trying to show that Gordon did not have the requisite intent to rob and was therefore guilty only of attempted aggravated robbery. Under the deferential standard by which counsel’s actions at trial are judged, Gordon has not shown that counsel’s conduct fell outside the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. Strickland , 466 U.S. at 689. The same arguments raised herein were rejected by the state court when it denied Gordon’s habeas application. Gordon has not attempted to show, now has he shown, that the state court’s decision (1) was contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court; or (2) was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) & (2). The denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is therefore AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,710,304
<SECURITIES>                                 1,007,050
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,723,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (414,693)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,554,662
<PP&E>                                       1,814,296
<DEPRECIATION>                               (332,747)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,051,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,569,116
<BONDS>                                        746,666
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,834,698
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,056,187)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,051,677
<SALES>                                      9,212,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,618,958
<CGS>                                      (2,788,054)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (7,236,715)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (405,811)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (346,242)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (346,242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-39: OTS Nos. H-2944 and H-4701]


Oritani Financial Corp., MHC, Township of Washington, NJ; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on May 10, 2010, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision approved the application of Oritani Financial Corp., MHC, 
and Oritani Bank, Township of Washington, New Jersey, to convert to the 
stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ffaf8a9d93969cd1b6919990bfb0abacd1ab8d9a9e8cd1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="722207101e1b115c3b1c141d323d26215c26001713015c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Northeast Regional Office, 
Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, New 
Jersey 07311.

    Dated: May 17, 2010.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-12117 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin C. Quinn,  President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



November 15, 2004



/S/ Kevin C. Quinn
------------------
Kevin C. Quinn
President

                                       37
EXHIBIT 32.4

                        FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, T.
Benjamin Marsho,  Assistant  Treasurer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



August 13, 2004



/S/ T. Benjamin Marsho
----------------------
T. Benjamin Marsho
Assistant Treasurer

                                       39
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John A.  Featherman,  III, Chief Executive  Officer and Chairman of the Board of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:     November 9, 2007

                                                     /s/ John A. Featherman
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     John A. Featherman, III
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chairman of the Board
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: May 17, 2010. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10236
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
Elmwood Park
IL
5/14/201010237
New Liberty Bank
Plymouth
MI
5/14/201010238
Satilla Community Bank
Saint Marys
GA
5/14/201010239
Southwest Community Bank
Springfield
MO
5/14/2010


[FR Doc. 2010-12386 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12245]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. FD 35339]


Carolina Coastal Railway, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Morehead & South Fork Railroad Co.

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Correction to Notice of Acquisition and Operation Exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice served and published in the 
Federal Register on January 15, 2010 (75 FR 2580), titled ``Carolina 
Coastal Railway, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--North 
Carolina State Ports Authority'' to reflect a correction submitted by 
Carolina Coastal Railway, Inc. (CLNA). CLNA filed a verified notice of 
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire, by assignment, the lease of 
Morehead & South Fork Railroad Co., Inc. (MHSF) with North Carolina 
State Ports Authority (SPA) and to operate approximately 0.87 miles of 
SPA's rail line. After the effective date of the exemption, CLNA filed 
a letter on February 16, 2010, notifying the Board that MHSF's counsel 
has advised CLNA that MHSF is not a party to any lease agreement with 
SPA and therefore was not assigning a lease to CLNA. Instead, MHSF 
assigned a freight easement and operating agreement to CNLA.\1\ This 
notice correctly identifies MHSF, instead of SPA, as the regulated 
party to the transaction, corrects the title, and clarifies what was 
conveyed. Accordingly, the correct title should read, ``Carolina 
Coastal Railway, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--Morehead & 
South Fork Railroad Co.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In a previous decision, MHSF acquired the freight easement 
over all railroad tracks at the Port of Morehead City, N.C., from 
Carolina Rail Service, LLC. These tracks are owned by SPA. Morehead 
& South Fork R.R.--Acquis. and Operation Exemption--Carolina Rail 
Service, LLC, FD 34748 (STB served Sept. 23, 2005).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Farr (202) 245-0359 [Federal 
Information Relay System (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8339].

    Decided: May 18, 2010.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-12245 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2195 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2195

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2000

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to the provisions 
of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act 
to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Truckee 
 watershed reclamation project for the reclamation and reuse of water.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRUCKEE WATERSHED RECLAMATION PROJECT.

    (a) Authorization.--The Secretary of the Interior, in cooperation 
with Washoe County, Nevada, may participate in the design, planning, 
and construction of, the Truckee watershed reclamation project, 
consisting of the North Valley Reuse Project and the Spanish Springs 
Valley Septic Conversion Project (``Project''), to reclaim and reuse 
wastewater (including degraded ground water) within and without the 
service area of Washoe County, Nevada.
    (b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the Project shall 
not exceed 25 percent of the total cost.
    (c) Limitation.--Funds provided by the Secretary shall not be used 
for the operation or maintenance of the Project.
    (d) Funding.--Funds appropriated pursuant to section 1615 of the 
Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act may be 
used for the Project (106 Stat. 4663-4669, 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.), as 
amended.

SEC. 2. RECLAMATION WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER STUDY AND FACILITIES ACT

    Design, planning, and construction of the Project shall be in 
accordance with, and subject to the limitations contained in, the 
Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (106 
Stat. 4663-4669, 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.), as amended.

            Passed the Senate October 13 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1274

WILLIAM SHEROD HENDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA; PATRICIA S.

O’BANNON; JAMES B. DONATI; RICHARD W. GLOVER;

FRANK J. THORNTON; SHEILA T. CADILL; BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS; ROBERT C. THOMPSON, Superintendent for the County of Henrico, Department of

Public Works; EDWARD L. PRIESTAS, Assistant

Director; JOHN C. PIGNATO, Benefits Officer

for the County of Henrico; DAVID E. GOSSETT;

VIRGIL HAZELETT, County Manager; HENRICO

COUNTY, Department of Public Works; RISK MANAGEMENT FOR THE COUNTY OF HENRICO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-790-3)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

William Sherod Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Paul Rapisarda,

Jr., County Attorney, Joseph Thomas Tokarz, II, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S

OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF HENRICO, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Sherod Henderson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his employment discrimination action brought under the

Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Henderson v.

County of Henrico, No. CA-98-790-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









As
independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated June 29, 2009 relating to the
financial statements of AdvanSource Biomaterials Corporation as of March 31,
2009, and to all references to our Firm, included in or made part of this Form
10-K, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8
(File Nos. 333-149341, 333-149342, 333-149343, 333-117594, 333-106607 and
333-05893), Form SB-2 (File No. 333-122123), Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-110779 and
333-72223), and Form S-4 (File No. 333-102115).














/s/
CATURANO AND COMPANY, P.C.




Boston,
Massachusetts


June 30,
2009
ex10_51.htm









 





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Petrosearch Energy Corporation:









We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Petrosearch Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the quarter then ended, in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting
and Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  All information included in these financial statements is the representation of management.





A review consists principally of inquiries of Company personnel and analytical procedures applied to financial data.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.





Based on our review we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying March 31, 2009 financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.













/s

Ham, Langston & Brezina, L.L.P.

Houston, Texas

June 12, 2009