alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Long-Term Incentive Plan Summary



 EXHIBIT 10.25 
 QC HOLDINGS, INC. 
 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
 On February 5, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of QC Holdings, Inc. adopted the Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTI
Plan”) for certain executive officers and other key employees of the Company. The LTI Plan is not set forth in any formal plan document. The following is a description of the key elements of the LTI Plan: 
  

	 	•	 	 LTI Plan will apply to the Area Manager position and above. 


  

	 	•	 	 LTI Plan will not apply to Don Early or Mary Lou Early absent future action by the Compensation Committee. 


  

	 	•	 	 LTI awards will be made annually. 


  

	 	•	 	 Compensation Committee annually will determine the approximate dollar value of LTI awards for each covered employee. 


  

	 	•	 	 LTI awards will consist of approximately 50% of value in stock options and approximately 50% of value in restricted stock awards for executive officers, until
otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee. 


  

	 	•	 	 LTI awards for non-executive officers will consist of 100% restricted stock awards, until otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee.



  

	 	•	 	 Restricted stock awards will vest ratably over a four-year period. Options will vest ratably over a four-year period with a 10-year term.



  

	 	•	 	 LTI awards will be made under the Company’s equity incentive plan(s).
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fedders Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending May 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Sal
Giordano, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sal Giordano, Jr.
----------------------------
Sal Giordano, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer

Date: July 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fedders Corporation and will be retained by Fedders Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       29
# Aaron Augustus Sargent: A Featured Biography

**

----

Born in Newburyport, Massachusetts, on September 28, 1827, Aaron Augustus Sargent was just 13 years old when he struck out on his own. He held a variety of jobs before entering politics, including printer, secretary to a U.S. congressman, California gold seeker, and newspaper owner. Sargent studied law and was admitted to the bar in 1854. He became active in the nascent California Republican Party, served in the state legislature, and was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1860. As a representative, Sargent promoted legislation to fund the construction of the Pacific Railroad. Elected to the U.S. Senate in 1872, he served from 1873 until 1879. Senator Sargent, whose wife, Ellen, was a prominent suffragist and friend to Elizabeth Cady Stanton, introduced the so-called Susan B. Anthony Amendment to the Constitution in 1878. Congress finally approved this amendment 41 years later, and it was ratified in 1920. Sargent died in 1887 and is interred in Nevada City, California.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
#### Guardian Trust Company of New York v. Crescent Brick and Supply Company.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars' costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50694

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEPHEN BOGDON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-88-CR-120

- - - - - - - - - -

June 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Stephen Bogdon, Texas prisoner # 40215-080, appeals the

district court’s denial of his motion to reduce his term of

imprisonment under 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He argues that the

district court abused its discretion in dismissing his §

3582(c)(2) motion. He argues that Amendment 268, which clarified

§ 4B1.2(2) of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, should be applied

retroactively to reduce his term of imprisonment. Because
No. 95-50694

- 2 -

Amendment 268 is not listed as having retroactive application

under § 1B1.10(c) of the Guidelines, Bogdon may not obtain relief

under § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Shaw, 30 F.3d 26, 29-30

(5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Miller, 903 F.2d 3412, 349 (5th

Cir. 1990). 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 of TLC Vision Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
P. Rasche, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        Date: August 22, 2006


                                        /s/ Steven P. Rasche
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven P. Rasche
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                       79
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28663-28664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (10-056)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for 
licensing.

DATES: May 21, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan A. Geurts, Patent Counsel, 
Goddard Space Flight Center, Mail Code 140.1, Greenbelt, MD 20771-0001; 
telephone (301) 286-7351; fax (301) 286-9502.
    NASA Case No. GSC-14968-2: Swarm Autonomic Agents with Self-
Destruct Capability.
    NASA Case No. GSC-15464-1: Optical Wave-Front Recovery for Active 
and Adaptive Imaging Control.
    NASA Case No. GSC-15732-1: Wind and Temperature Spectrometer with 
Crossed Small-Deflection Energy Analyzer.


[[Page 28664]]


    Dated: May 17, 2010.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-12161 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
#### Isaac Cheney and Alfred L. Acee, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*John H. Walton, defendant in error. Isaac Cheney and William H. McCrory, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*John H. Walton, defendant in error.

Where a defendant seeks a new trial, on account of his having been providentially prevented from being present in Court when the judgment was rendered, and thus deprived of the benefit of his testimony, it is necessary that he should show, affirmatively, the facts he could have proven, so that the Court can judge of the materiality of the same. (R.)

New trial. Before Judge Johnson. Talbot Superior Court. March Term, 1872.

The two cases above stated were argued together. All the facts necessary to an understanding of the cases are set forth in the decision of the Court.

Blandford & Crawford ; J. M. Matthews, for plaintiffs in error.

E. H. Worrill *;*B. Hill, for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was a motion for a new trial on the ground that the defendant was absent from the Court when the judgment was rendered against him, on account of the sickness of his wife, and that if he had been present at the trial he could have proved and shown that the plaintiff had not paid all legal taxes chargeable by law on said contract for each and every year from the making or implying of said contract or the income thereof. It appears, from the bill of exceptions, that the plaintiff, on the trial, did prove the payment of taxes, as set forth in bis affidavit. The motion for a new trial was overruled, and the defendant excepted. There was no brief of the evidence filed as the rule of Court requires, and the Court may have overruled the motion on that ground. *433But we think the defendant’s affidavit was not sufficient to authorize the Court to have granted the motion. The defendant should have shown to- the Court *the facts*which he could prove, going to show the plaintiff had not paid the taxes, and by whom he could prove the same, so that the Court might judge whether the facts would probably change the result if a new trial was granted, and the affidavit of the witness by whom he expected to prove the facts as to what he vsmuld swear in relation to the non-payment of taxes by the plaintiff. In order to get rid of a judgment and have a new trial, the defendant should have shown affirmatively to the Court the facts die could prove, so that the Court could have judged of the materiality of the same; the judgment of the defendant and the judgment of the Court might differ as to the effect of the proof which the defendant might offer as to the non-payment of the taxes, the more especially when the plaintiff had proved on the trial that he had paid them.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
#### John R. Binns v. Vitagraph Company.

Motion denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2587 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                  S.2587

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the excise tax 
                         on heavy truck tires.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2000

 Mr. Nickles (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
          bill; which was referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the excise tax 
                         on heavy truck tires.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIMPLIFICATION OF EXCISE TAX ON HEAVY TRUCK TIRES.

    (a) Tax Based on Tire Load Capacity Not Weight.--Subsection (a) of 
section 4071 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
imposition of tax on tires) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Imposition and Rate of Tax.--There is hereby imposed on tires 
of the type used on highway vehicles, if wholly or in part made of 
rubber, sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer a tax equal to 
8 cents for each 10 pounds of the tire load capacity in excess of 3500 
pounds.''.
    (b) Tire Load Capacity.--Subsection (c) of section 4071 of such 
Code is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Tire Load Capacity.--For purposes of this section, tire load 
capacity is the maximum load rating labeled on the tire pursuant to 
section 571.109 or 571.119 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. In 
the case of any tire that is marked for both single and dual loads, the 
higher of the 2 shall be used for purposes of this section.''.
    (c) Tires to Which Tax Applies.--Subsection (b) of section 4072 of 
such Code (defining tires of the type used on highway vehicles) is 
amended by striking ``tires of the type'' the second place it appears 
and all that follows and inserting ``tires--
            ``(1) of the type used on--
                    ``(A) motor vehicles which are highway vehicles, or
                    ``(B) vehicles of the type used in connection with 
                motor vehicles which are highway vehicles, and
            ``(2) marked for highway use pursuant to section 571.109 or 
        571.119 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on January 1 of the first calendar year which begins more than 
30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1884-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of California (FEMA-1884-DR), dated March 8, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         April 18, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Sandy Coachman, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Michael H. Smith as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-12198 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.01 - Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the inclusion or incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Saks Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-18589) of our reports
dated March 4, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Saks Holdings, Inc. as of February 1, 1997 and
February 3, 1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended February 1,
1997, which reports are included or incorporated by reference in this Annual
Shareholders Report on Form 10-K.




                                                  /s/  Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

New York, New York
May 2, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,278
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,375
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     41,786
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,637
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,353
<LOANS>                                        154,129
<ALLOWANCE>                                        963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 226,944
<DEPOSITS>                                     199,464
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                823
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 226,944
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,070
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  998
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    20
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,088
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,473
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,576
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,512
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       21
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    659
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         442
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.71
<LOANS-NON>                                        627
<LOANS-PAST>                                       244
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   299
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    365
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   956
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       14
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  963
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               377
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            586
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
FaxSav Incorporated on Form S-8 (File No. 333-17293) of our report dated March
18, 1997, on our audits of the financial statements and financial statement
schedule of FaxSav Incorporated (formerly Digitran Corporation) as of December
31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Parsippany, New Jersey
March 27, 1997
EXHIBIT 31.5

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Marissa A. Mayer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Yahoo! Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 26, 2014



By:

/s/ MARISSA A. MAYERMarissa A. MayerChief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

N OEL C ASTILLO and N ORMA C ASTILLO,

Appellant s

,

v.

M ARIA M ARTINEZ,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00167

- CV

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2022

- CCV00425)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. It appearing to this Court that

Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no other order with respect to costs.

This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023.

Y VONNE T. RODRIGUEZ

, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.