alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Respecting Capitol Art

**

----

During your visit, help preserve the Capitol’s statues and other works of art. Enjoy looking at them, but do not touch them – each touch does some damage.

        -  Officers & Staff 
        -            -  Vice President 
          -  President Pro Tempore 
          -  Secretary of the Senate 
          -  Sergeant at Arms 
          -  Party Secretaries 
          -  Chaplain 
          -  Committee & Office Staff 
          -  Pages 
        -  Powers & Procedures 
        -            -  Censure 
          -  Declarations of War 
          -  Expulsion 
          -  Filibuster & Cloture 
          -  Impeachment 
          -  Investigations 
          -  Nominations 
          -  Rules 
          -  Treaties 
          -  Voting 
        -  Origins & Foundations 
        -            -  The Senate & the Constitution 
          -  Electing & Appointing Senators 
          -  Committee System 
          -  Idea of the Senate 
          -  Parties & Leadership 
        -  Traditions & Symbols 
        -  Historic Buildings & Spaces 
        -            -  The Capitol 
          -  Senate Chamber 
          -  Historic Rooms 
          -  Senate Office Buildings 
          -  Congressional Meeting Places 
          -  Past Senate Chambers 
        -  Oral History Project 
        -  Historical Highlights 
        -            -  1787-1800 
          -  1801-1850 
          -  1851-1877 
          -  1878-1920 
          -  1921-1940 
          -  1941-1963 
          -  1964-present 
        -  Senate Stories Blog 
        -  Research Tools 

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
2014 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-23-2014

In Re: Dumont Bush

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket 13-4614

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2014

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2014 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Dumont Bush " (2014). 2014 Decisions. Paper 92.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2014/92
ALD-113 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 13-4614

___________

IN RE: DUMONT BUSH,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to Crim. No. 2-95-cr-00407-006)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

January 9, 2014

Before: RENDELL, FISHER and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: January 23, 2014)

_________

O P I N I O N

_________

PER CURIAM

On November 26, 2012, Dumont Bush filed a motion to correct clerical error 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. On December 2, 2013, Bush filed the 

present petition for a writ of mandamus asking us to compel the District Court to rule 

upon that motion. The District Court entered an order denying Bush’s motion on 

December 12, 2013. Accordingly, we will deny the mandamus petition as moot.
1 We construe pro sepleadings liberally. Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, Kan., 318

F.3d 1183, 1187 (10th Cir. 2003). 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### August 24, 2005 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
MACK RAY RUCKER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant,
v. CHARLES RAY, Warden; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Respondents - Appellees. No. 04-6209 (W.D. Oklahoma) (D.Ct. No. 03-CV-1740-R)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

AND DISMISSING APPEAL
Before KELLY , O’BRIEN , and TYMKOVICH , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Mack Ray Rucker Jr., pro se , 1 appeals the district court's decision denying him habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254, from his Oklahoma conviction for-2-

domestic violence, affirmed by the Oklahoma Court o f Criminal Appeals. See Rucker v. Oklahoma , No. F-2001-1341 (OCCA Dec. 20, 2002) (unpublished ). On appeal, Rucker argues that 1) there was insuffic ient evidence to support his conviction; 2) his attorney provided ineffective re presentation; and 3) he was denied a fair trial due to cumulative error. To pursue this appeal, Rucker must first obtain a c ertificate of appealability (COA). See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). To be entitled to a CO A, he must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitut ional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). To make this showing, he must establis h that “reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree th at) the petition should have been resolved [by the district court] in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal quotations omitted). After carefully considering Rucker’s arguments and the entire record, we concur with the well-written and thoughtful report and recommen dation of the magistrate judge, adopted by the district court in its order d enying habeas relief. Rucker has failed to make a sufficient showing that he is enti tled to a COA on any of his claims. Therefore, we DISMISS this appeal. In addition, Rucker’s pending request to proceed in forma pauperis filed in this Court is DENIED. He shall remit the full amou nt of the filing fee within-3-

twenty (20) days of this order.
Entered by the Court: Terrence L. O’Brien United States Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2019

b1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2019

159072 & (36)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159072

COA: 344196

Wayne CC: 14-006130-FC

FREDRICK KYLE YOUNG,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2018 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting 

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this 

order, addressing only the defendant’s factual assertion in Issue V of his application that 

he filed a motion for a new trial in the circuit court, and not a motion for relief from 

judgment. 

The application for leave to appeal and motion for peremptory reversal remain 

pending.
Exhibit 11
                   THE TURNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES			
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE			
                  (in thousands, except per share amounts) 	
			
	                                                              (unaudited)		
                                                           	Three Months Ended		
                                                                 March 31,
                                                          	 1997	       1996
PRIMARY			
Weighted average common shares outstanding	                5,259       5,227 
Common stock equivalents (assuming the use of the
 proceeds from their exercise or issuance to
 acquire treasury stock using the average quarterly
 market price) granted under employee stock			
 option and stock purchase plans	                            129          67 
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
 outstanding	                                              5,388       5,294
			
Net income available to common stockholders-primary        	$784      		$629 
			
Primary earnings per common share                         	$0.15     		$0.12 
			
FULLY DILUTED			
Weighted average shares outstanding used in the
 computation of primary earnings per share                 5,259       5,227
Common stock equivalents (assuming the use of the
 proceeds from their exercise or issuance to acquire
 treasury stock using the average market price for
 the quarter ended 3/31/97 and the closing market			
 price for the quarter ended 3/31/96) granted under
 employee stock option and stock purchase plans   	          129 		       92 
Conversion of  Series B convertible preferred stock
 to common stock                                   	         848 		      849 
Conversion of Series D convertible debentures to
 common stock	                                               600 	  	      - 
Weighted average common and common equivalent
 shares outstanding	                                       6,836       6,168		
Net income available to common stockholders 
 less Series B preferred dividend differential,
 net of tax                                                	$784      		$629 
Interest expense on Series D convertible
 debentures, net of tax                                       74 		        - 
Net income available to common stockholders -
 fully diluted                                             	$858      		$629 
			
Fully diluted earnings per common share	                   $0.13     		$0.10
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2504 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2504

  To amend title VI of the Clean Air Act with respect to the phaseout 
                      schedule for methyl bromide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2000

Mr. Craig (for himself and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title VI of the Clean Air Act with respect to the phaseout 
                      schedule for methyl bromide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Methyl Bromide Fairness Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. PHASEOUT SCHEDULE FOR METHYL BROMIDE.

    Section 604 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7671c), as amended by 
section 764 of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as 
contained in section 101(a) of division A of Public Law 105-277; 112 
Stat. 2681, 2681-36), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d), by amending paragraph (5) to read as 
        follows:
            ``(5) Sanitation and food protection.--Notwithstanding any 
        other provision of this title, the production, importation, and 
        consumption of methyl bromide to fumigate commodities or 
        articles or facilities where such commodities or articles may 
        be processed or stored for purposes of compliance with Animal 
        and Plant Health Inspection Service requirements or with any 
        international, Federal, State, or local sanitation or food 
        protection standard shall be exempt.''; and
            (2) by amending subsection (h) to read as follows:
    ``(h) Methyl Bromide.--Notwithstanding section 602(d), section 606, 
or subsection (b) or (d) of this section, the Administrator shall not 
terminate production of methyl bromide prior to January 1, 2015. The 
Administrator shall promulgate rules for reductions in, and terminate 
the production, importation, and consumption of, methyl bromide under a 
schedule that is in accordance with, but not more stringent than, the 
phaseout schedule of the Montreal Protocol for developing countries as 
described in article 5 of such Protocol.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief executive officer of MacroChem Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1)   the Company's Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                    /s/  Robert J. DeLuccia
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Robert J. DeLuccia
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 8, 2003
       --------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MacroChem Corporation and will be retained by MacroChem Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       22
<PAGE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2131

To suspend temporarily the duty on Rhinovirus Drugs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 1, 2000

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Rhinovirus Drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANS-(2’R, 3’’’S,4S,5′S)- (4-{2’-(4-

4 FLUOROBENZYL)-6’ -METHYL-5’-[(5’’-

5 METHYLISOXAZOLE -3’’-CARBONYL) AMINO]-4-

6 OXOHEPTANOYLAMINO}-5- (2’’’-

7 OXOPYRROLIDIN- 3’’’-YL)PENT-2-ENOIC ACID

8 ETHYL ESTER.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

10 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is
2

•S 2131 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

2 new headings:

‘‘ 9902.32.97 Trans-(2’R,

3’’’S,4S,5′S)- (4-

{2’-(4-

Fluorobenzyl)-6’

-methyl-5’- [(5’’-

methylisoxazole

-3’’-carbonyl)

amino]-4-

oxoheptanoylamino}-5- (2’’’-

oxopyrrolidin3’’’-yl)pent-2-

enoic acid ethyl

ester (provided

for in subheading

2931.00.60) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

6 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of

7 this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-36682, 333-43750, 333-64414, 333-72553,
333-74390, 333-103231 and 333-112356) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-35992, 333-56216
and 333-112935) of SIGA Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 17, 2004
relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1191]



[[Page 3723]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC10-43-000]


Longhorn Partners Pipeline L.P.; Notice of Filing

January 14, 2010.
    Take notice that on January 6, 2010, Longhorn Partners Pipeline 
L.P. submitted a request for the waiver of the requirement to file the 
2009 FERC Form No. 6 Annual Report from January 1, 2009 through July 
29, 2009.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3b5b6a1b0bc9d9f9a9d96a08683839c8187b395968190dd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c4a495e4f4362606562695f797c7c637e784c6a697e6f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: February 3, 2010.

Kimberly Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-1191 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as general counsel, vicepresident corporate development of MacroChem Corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1)     Company’s report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “ Form 10-Q ”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2)     the information contained in the Company’sForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  Lawrence  Reilly |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |                            |
|   | Lawrence Reilly            |
|   | (Principal  Accounting Officer) |

 

 

Dated:    August 14, 2008

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MacroChemCorporation and will be retained by MacroChem Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2427 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2427

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Undecylenic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 2000

 Mr. Thompson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Undecylenic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNDECYLENIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.29.01     Undecylenic      Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     acid (CAS No.                                                           31/2002          ''
                     112-38-9)                                                                                 .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     2916.19.30)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Appeal Reinstated; Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed; and Memorandum 

Opinion filed November 13, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00284-CV

JOSEPH FRIED, Appellant 

V.

PAUL HARLAN & ROBERT COLLINS, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 234th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-12069 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order signed March 23, 2017. We 

abated the appeal on the parties’ motion on June 21, 2018, for the parties to pursue 

settlement. On November 8, 2018, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

We reinstate the appeal, grant the motion, and dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Brown
Fourth Department,

May, 1911.

#### S. Jeanie Davis, Appellant, v. Albert W. Tremain, as Executor and Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Eleanor H. Higgins, Deceased, and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.