alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Senate Office of Public Records Feedback Form

**

----

Please help us serve you better by taking a couple of minutes to tell us about the service you've received from our office.
In your most recent customer service experience, how did you contact our staff?
In personBy telephoneBy emailDid not contact staff
In which issue or area was your question or problem?
LobbyFinancial DisclosureGift Rule/TravelMass MailingOther (please specify)​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Did our staff member: (check all that apply)
Quickly identify the problemAppear knowledgeable and competentHelp you understand the cause and solution of the problemHandle issues with courtesy and professionalism
Overall, how satisfied are you with this customer service experience?
Very SatisfiedSomewhat SatisfiedNeutralSomewhat DissatisfiedVery DissatisfiedIf you were less than satisfied, what could have been done to serve you better?If you have other suggestions, comments or concerns, please tell us here.Name (optional)Email (optional)
Thank you for your feedback. We value your time and input and look forward toserving you in the future.
UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">-  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
-  Nominations 
-  Treaties 
-  Votes 
-  Floor Proceedings 
-  Rules & Procedure 
-  Landmark Legislation 
-  Sessions of Congress 
-  Senate Archives 
-  Public Disclosure 
Contact Information 
Office of Public Records232 Hart Senate Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20510-7116Main: (202) 224-0322Lobby: (202) 224-0758TDD: (202) 224-4722lobby@sec.senate.gov

Send Us Your Feedback
Amended Lobby Law 
The Lobbying Disclosure Act compilation provides amended language from public laws 104-65, 105-166, and 110-81 and 115-418. It is current through April 1, 2019
Registration Thresholds 
Current Thresholds
SENATORS- Contact
- Leadership & Officers
- Former Senators
- Qualifications & Terms of Service
- Facts & Milestones
- States
COMMITTEES- Membership & Assignments
- Hearings & Meetings
- History
LEGISLATION & RECORDS- Bills, Acts, & Laws
- Nominations
- Treaties
- Votes
- Floor Proceedings
- Rules & Procedure
- Landmark Legislation
- Sessions of Congress
- Senate Archives
- Public Disclosure
ART & ARTIFACTS- Fine Art
- Decorative Art
- Historical Images
- Historical Artifacts
- Thematic Collections
ABOUT THE SENATE- Officers & Staff
- Powers & Procedures
- Origins & Foundations
- Traditions & Symbols
- Historic Buildings & Spaces
- Oral History Project
- Historical Highlights
- Senate Stories Blog
- Research Tools

Contact   |             Content Responsibility   |             Usage Policy   |     Privacy Policy   |             Employment & Internships   |           Procurement   |             www.senate.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0642 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JENNIFER RENEE SKAW,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 14, 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 19 2022

12/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0642
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
, Appellant,

v.

CHARTER SCHOOLS USA AT HOLLYWOOD, L.C. a Florida Limited Liability Company

, a/k/a CHARTER SCHOOLS USA AT HOLLYWOOD, LLC a/k/a CHARTER SCHOOLS USA AT HOLLYWOOD, INC.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 3060

[ December 29, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Carol Lisa Phillips , Judge; L.T. Case N o. CACE 12

- 35194

.

Jeffrey B. Crockett of Coffey Burlington, P.L., Miami

, for appellant.

Stephanie Alexander and Lisa MacClugage of Tripp Scott, P.A., Fort

Lauderdale , and Thomas Scott of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, L EVINE and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 09
- 00230
- CV $1,711 IN UNITED STA TES CURRENCY , Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 170th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009
- 1538
- 4, 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronald Cla yton Bible filed a notice of appeal with the District Clerk on July 17, 2009 regarding an adverse judgment by the trial court in a forfeiture case. A few days later, on July 20, 2009, Bible filed a document indicating that he no longer wished to appeal th e trial court’s decision. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1(a)(1). Further, absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of this Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 12.1(b); Appendix to
T EX
. R. A PP
. P ., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). S ee$1,711 v. State Page 2

also T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 5; 10 TH T EX
. A PP
. (W ACO ) L OC

. R. 5; T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2008). Un der the circumstances of this proceeding, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 2. The write

- off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Bible.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed August 5 , 2009 [CV06]
# States in the Senate | Ohio Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

 1. Resigned on or before this date, having been elected governor.

 2. Vacancy from Mar 4 to Mar. 14, 1851, because of failure of legislature to elect.

 3. Resigned Sept. 30, 1945, to accept appointment on Supreme Court.

 4. Elected on November 2, 1976, for the term commencing January 3, 1977; subsequently appointed by the Governor, December 29, 1976, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Robert Taft, Jr.

 5. Elected in 1920 for the term commencing March 4, 1921, and subsequently appointed in January 1921 to fill the vacancy in the term ending March 3, 1921, caused by the resignation of Warren G. Harding

 6. Elected Nov. 2, 1954, to fill vacancy in term ending Jan. 3, 1957. Chose to continue as member of the House of Representatives until Dec. 15, 1954, waiving right to commence service in the Senate on Dec. 3, 1954.

 7. Elected to full term commencing Jan. 3, 1975; subsequently appointed by governor to fill vacancy in term ending Jan. 3, 1975.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                          ESSENTIAL THERAPEUTICS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Essential Therapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Skaletsky, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                   /s/ Mark Skaletsky
                                                ---------------------------
                                                      Mark Skaletsky
                                                Chairman of the Board, President
                                                  and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2003
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Elamex, S.A. de C.V. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K/A for the year ended on December 31, 2004, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and to
      which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Richard R. Harshman,
      the
      principal executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      January 6, 2006








*/S/
                Richard R. Harshman*Richard
                R. HarshmanPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51158 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANGEL HERNANDEZ-SANTA CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1003-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Angel HernandezSanta Cruz raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 for May Limited  Partnership 1983-3 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000743453
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         208
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               365
<PP&E>                                         16,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   906
<SALES>                                        594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               601
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                364
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            364
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  16.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  16.08
        


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Senior Circuit Judge for the ***

Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN RAMIREZ CAMPOS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-71355

Agency No. A027-570-264

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2011** 

Pasadena, California

Before: CUDAHY , WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. *** 

Juan Ramirez Campos (“Ramirez”), a citizen and national of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his

FILED

SEP 15 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We review the

BIA’s legal determinations de novo. Aguiluz-Arellano v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 980,

983 (9th Cir. 2006). When the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s

decision as if it were the BIA’s. Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th

Cir. 2002). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the

petition. 

The BIA correctly determined that expungement of Ramirez’s conviction for

possession of marijuana for sale, Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11359, did not

eliminate the conviction for immigration purposes. See Ramirez-Castro v. INS,

287 F.3d 1172, 1174 (9th Cir. 2002) (state expungement of a criminal conviction

generally does not remove its consequences in immigration proceedings). 

Ramirez’s conviction under § 11359 for possession for sale is not covered by the

Federal First Offender Act (“FFOA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3607, which for immigration

purposes eliminates only convictions for simple possession. Cardenas-Uriarte v.

INS, 227 F.3d 1132, 1136 (9th Cir. 2000) (“The Federal First Offender Act

requires a plea or conviction of possession of a controlled substance, as described

in 21 U.S.C. § 844.”), overruled in part on other grounds by Nunez-Reyes v.

Holder, 646 F.3d 684 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc). Thus, Ramirez’s § 11359

conviction renders him inadmissible on the basis of a controlled substance
3

violation, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), and ineligible for waiver of

inadmissibility under § 1182(h). 

Ramirez’s claim that he was denied due process because the BIA did not

address his § 1182(h) waiver claim lacks merit. The BIA expressly adopted the

IJ’s decision, which discussed the waiver claim. Moreover, because Ramirez is

ineligible for waiver under § 1182(h), he cannot make the necessary showing of

prejudice. See Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 1001, 1006 & n.16 (9th Cir.

2003) (an alien “must show prejudice to succeed in a due process challenge”). 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars                
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998           
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998    
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1    
<CASH>                               161,558   
<SECURITIES>                               0   
<RECEIVABLES>                      2,871,108   
<ALLOWANCES>                               0   
<INVENTORY>                          505,787   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   5,404,470   
<PP&E>                             1,227,089   
<DEPRECIATION>                             0   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     7,261,074   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              3,508,044   
<BONDS>                                    0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0   
<PREFERRED>                                0   
<COMMON>                           8,255,348   
<OTHER-SE>                        (4,898,207)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       7,261,074  
<SALES>                           11,083,239   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  11,083,239   
<CGS>                              3,047,616   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      3,047,616   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   5,723,228   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    48,442   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      263,953   
<INCOME-TAX>                               0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  263,953   
<DISCONTINUED>                             0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0   
<CHANGES>                                  0   
<NET-INCOME>                         263,953   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .05   
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .05   
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                       FNB FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

                            ------------------------

                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

                            ------------------------

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Michael W. Shelton, Chief Financial
Officer of FNB Financial Services Corporation ("FNB"),  hereby certifies, to his
or her knowledge, that:

     1)   FNB's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September
          30, 2003,  fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information  contained in FNB's Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
          the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNB.

          EXECUTED this 10th day of November, 2003.

                                          /s/ Michael W. Shelton
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Michael W. Shelton,
                                          Chief Financial Officer of
                                          FNB Financial Services Corporation

                                       26
# African American Senators

**

----

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Related Links 

Celebrating Black History Month 

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

        In connection with the Annual Report of SIGA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)        on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Eric A. Rose,        M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18        U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the        Company.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided        to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | /s/ Eric A. Rose        |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Dr. Eric A. Rose, M.D.  |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | March 13, 2008          |

----
**Exhibit 10.33**

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

Between 

Mirant Corporation 

and 

Thomas E. Legro 

This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“the Amendment”) ismade as of October, 31, 2006, between Mirant Corporation (the “Company”), Mirant Services, LLC (“Services”) and Thomas E. Legro (“Executive”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shallhave the same meaning as set forth in the Employment Agreement executed by the parties on December 1, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”). 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and in compliance with Section 18 of the Employment Agreement, the parties hereto agree to amend the EmploymentAgreement as follows: 

The portion of Section 5(a) of the Employment Agreement that states: 

Severance. 

(a)Termination Without Cause, Non-Renewal or for Good Reason. In the event of Executive’s termination of employment with the Company (1) by the Company without Cause (as defined herein), (2) by reason of the failure of the Companyto offer to renew the Agreement on terms that are based on competitive practices for companies of comparable size and standing in the same industry, or (3) by Executive for Good Reason (as defined herein), subject to the execution of a Releasesubstantially in the form attached as Exhibit D, Executive shall be entitled to the benefits set forth in this Section 5(a). 

shall hereby be amendedto state as follows: 

Severance. 

(a) Termination Without Cause, Non-Renewal or for Good Reason. In the event of Executive’s termination of employment with the Company (1) by the Company without Cause (as defined herein), (2) byreason of the failure of the Company to offer to renew the Agreement on terms and conditions at least equal to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement executed on December 1, 2005, which shall be deemed to include a Base Salary andTarget Bonus at least equal to the Executive’s Base Salary and Target Bonus at such time, or (3) by Executive for Good Reason (as defined herein), subject to the execution of a Release substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D,Executive shall be entitled to the benefits set forth in this Section 5(a). 

The terms of this Amendment shall have no force and effect on any other provision of the EmploymentAgreement, including subsections (i) through (v) of Section 5(a). Upon execution, the terms of this Amendment shall be incorporated into the Employment Agreement and shall become binding and enforceable to the same extent and underthe same terms and conditions as all other provisions in the Employment Agreement when executed on December 1, 2005. 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 

 
**MIRANT CORPORATION**By:   Patricia A. BarnardIts: SVP, Administration**MIRANT SERVICES, LLC**By:   Patricia A. BarnardIts: SVP, Administration **Thomas E. Legro**