alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sami S. Abbasi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

/s/ Sami S. Abbasi

---

Sami S. Abbasi

President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 30, 2006

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBITS


          5.   Exhibit 11.0   Statement Re: computation of per share earnings
                              (loss)
                                                                      Year
                                                                     ended
Primary                                                           Dec. 31,1996
                                                                 --------------
         Average shares outstanding                                  3,680,575
         Net effect of dilutive stock options
              based on the treasury stock method
              using the average market price                               658
                                                                 --------------
         Total                                                       3,681,233
                                                                 ==============
         Net loss                                                   ($691,495)
                                                                 ==============
         Per share amount                                              ($0.19)
                                                                 ==============


Fully-diluted
         Average shares outstanding                                  3,680,575
         Net effect of dilutive stock options
              based on the treasury stock method using the
              market price at end of period or the average
              market price, whichever is higher                            658
                                                                 --------------
         Total                                                       3,681,233
                                                                 ==============
         Net loss                                                    ($691,495)
                                                                 ==============
         Per share amount                                               ($0.19)
                                                                 ==============

                           78
J

- S58042

- 15

_____________________________ *Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. CHAD MULHOLLAND Appellant No. 746 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence March 2 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 06

- CR

- 0002537

- 2014

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., OLSON, J., and PLATT, J.*
MEMORANDUM BY GANTMAN, P.J.: FILED OCTOBER 02, 2015 Appellant, Chad Mulholland, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Berks County Court of Common Pleas, following his jury trial convictions for the offenses of possession of drug p araphernalia and possession of a small amount of marijuana. 1 In its opinion, the trial court fully and correctly sets forth the relevant facts and procedural history of this case. Therefore, we have no reason to restate them.
Appellant raises the foll owing issues for our review:
WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS INSUFFICIENT TO

___________________________________________ _ 1 35 P.S. §§ 780

- 113(a)(32) and (31)(i), respectively.J

- S58042

- 15

- 2

- SUPPORT THE GUILTY V ERDICTS SINCE THE COMMONWEALTH FAILED TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THA T [APPELLANT] WAS IN ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE POSS ESSION OF MARIJUANA OR DRUG PARAPHERNALIA.
WHETHER THE GUILTY V ERDICTS WERE AGAINST THE WEIGHT OF THE EVIDEN CE WHERE THE BASIS O F [APPELLANT’S] CONVIC TION WAS THE TESTIMO NY OF A WOMAN WHO WAS NOT CR EDIBLE, GIVEN THAT T HE JURY HAD FOUND [APPELLANT ] NOT GUILTY OF OTHE R COUNTS BASED ON THE SAME TE ST IMONY. (Appellant’s Brief at 5). After a thorough review of the record, the briefs of the parties, the applicable law, and the well

- reasoned opinion of the Honorable Thomas G. Parisi, we conclude Appellant’s issues merit no relief. The trial court opinion comprehensively discusses and properly disposes of the questions presented. ( See Trial Court Opinion, filed June 11, 2015, at 2

- 8) (finding: (1) Appellant’s girlfriend testified that she argued with Appellant because he was using drugs and she was pregnant; Appellant’s girlfriend testified that pipe and marijuana belonged to Appellant; Appellant confirmed he shared with his girlfriend bedroom where marijuana was found; Appellant’s girlfriend testified she found pipe in apartment she shared with App ellant; jury could reasonably infer Appellant had equal access to, and ability and intent to exercise conscious dominion over, marijuana and paraphernalia found in residence; under theory of constructive possession, evidence was sufficient to support Appel lant’s convictions; (2) evidence presented at trial was not contrary to jury verdict; jury was free to weigh testimony of eachJ

- S58042

- 15

- 3

-

witness and determine which evidence it found credible; verdict did not shock court’s conscience). Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the trial court’s opinion. Judgment of sentence affirmed. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 10/2/2015
Third Department,

May, 1911.

#### Michael T. Smith, Respondent, *v.*Columbia Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Insurance*— *policy on automobile*— *evidence.*

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the clerk’s office of the county of Albany on the 2d day of May, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury, and from an- order entered in said clerk’s office on the same day denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

Whether Soden was defendant’s agent or not, the defendant adopted his act in binding it to insurance in signing as agent of defendant the application of January 19, 1909. There was no express warranty of type or cost of the automobile on the part of the plaintiff, and the answer alleges only misrepresentation and deceit respecting these matters. Such representations in the application the defendant realized could not be true, and so stated, but voluntarily took the risk of issuing a policy for the amount of $2,500 until further information could be obtained. When further information was obtained, the defendant did not offer to surrender the policy because it Had been procured by fraud, but treated •it as a valid one, giving the ten days’ notice of cancellation stipulated in the policy. The fire occurred before that notice expired. It was not error to permit the plaintiff to ask Soden on cross-examination if he did not tell the plaintiff that he was acting for the company. It was part of the conversation had, and was not received for the purpose of showing agency, and the court instructed the jury that it did not prove that fact. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00376-CV

Texas General Land Office and George P. Bush,

named in his Official Capacity as Texas Land Commissioner, Appellants

v.

City of Houston, Appellee

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-20-003520, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

On November 20, 2020, we abated this appeal after granting Appellants’ unopposed 

motion for a 30-day abatement. We instructed the parties to file either a status report or motion to 

dismiss by the end of the abatement period.

The parties have filed their Joint Status Report and Request for Extension of 

Abatement. In it, they seek an extension of the abatement to January 4, 2021, explaining that

they are continuing “working . . . to determine whether the underlying case can be dismissed 

by agreement.”

The Court grants the parties’ request for an abatement extension and extends the 

abatement until January 4, 2021. The parties are ordered to file another status report, or a motion 

to dismiss, by that date.
2

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly

Abated

Filed: December 23, 2020
# Stephen A. Douglas: A Featured Biography

**

----

Known as “the Little Giant” because his political stature far exceeded his height of five-foot-four, Illinois senator Stephen A. Douglas remained a prominent national figure from his first election to the Senate in 1847 until his death in 1861. When the Compromise of 1850, an omnibus bill proposed by Henry Clay, seemed on the verge of collapse, Senator Douglas took the bill apart and built separate coalitions around each of its key provisions, ensuring its passage and holding the Union together. Douglas then undid his own handiwork by promoting the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. Designed to promote expansion into western territories, the act further divided the nation over the issue of slavery, spurred the creation of the modern Republican Party, and hastened the rise of Abraham Lincoln. In 1860 Douglas was one of four major candidates for the presidency, running on a Northern Democratic ticket, but he lost the election to his old rival, Abe Lincoln. When Confederates fired on Fort Sumter in April 1861, Douglas put aside old rivalries and joined Lincoln to support the Union cause. “There can be no neutrals in this war," he declared, "only patriots and traitors.” As Douglas rallied Northern Democrats to support the president, his health steadily declined. He died in his hotel room on June 3, 1861, at the age of 48.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Stephen A. Douglas
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION I, Daniel T. Voelpel,certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Franklin Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issueras of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4 The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 11, 2007 /s/ Daniel T Voelpel Daniel T. Voelpel    Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer  
 - 18 -
Exhibit 24.1

February 1, 2008



|                           |  |                           
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|James V. Iaco              |  | Thomas E. Legro           
|1155 Perimeter Center West |  | 1155 Perimeter Center West
|Atlanta, Georgia 30338     |  | Atlanta, Georgia 30338    

Dear Mr. Iaco and Mr. Legro:

Mirant Corporation (the Company) proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

The Company and the undersigned directors of the Company,
individually as a director of the Company, hereby make, constitute and appoint James V. Iaco and Thomas E. Legro our true and lawful Attorneys for each of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the foregoing said Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any appropriate amendment or amendments thereto and any necessary exhibits.



Yours very truly,MIRANT CORPORATIONBy

/s/ Edward R. MullerEdward R. MullerBy

/s/ Thomas W. CasonThomas W. CasonBy

/s/ A. D. CorrellA. D. CorrellBy

/s/ Terry G. DallasTerry G. DallasBy

/s/ Thomas H. JohnsonThomas H. JohnsonBy

/s/ John T. MillerJohn T. MillerBy

/s/ Robert C. MurrayRobert C. MurrayBy

/s/ John M. QuainJohn M. QuainBy

/s/ William L. ThackerWilliam L. Thacker
CERTIFICATION



         In connection with the annual report of ICTS International, N.V. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Barnea, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

ICTS INTERNATIONAL, N.V.
By:/s/  Michael Barnea,  Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   July 21, 2004



<PAGE>
                                  CERTIFICATION


         In connection with the annual report of ICTS International, N.V. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stefan Vermeulen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

ICTS INTERNATIONAL, N.V.
By: /s/  Stefan Vermeulen,  Chief Financial Officer

Dated:   July 21, 2004
# Tentative 2014 Legislative Schedule

**

----

**113th Congress, 2nd Session**

The *tentative* schedule for 2014 has been announced. The list below identifies expected non-legislative periods (days that the Senate *will not* be in session). The schedule is also available in calendar format (pdf image). The 2013 tentative schedule is still available. 
DateActionNoteJan 6Convene Jan 20 - Jan 24State Work PeriodMartin Luther King Jr. HolidayFeb 17 - Feb 21State Work PeriodPresidents' Day- Feb 17Mar 17 - Mar 21State Work Period Apr 14 - Apr 25State Work Period May 26 - May 30State Work PeriodMemorial Day- May 26Jun 30 - Jul 4State Work PeriodIndependence Day- Jul 4Aug 4 - Sep 5State Work PeriodLabor Day- Sep 1Target Adjournment DateTBD
Updated on Nov 19, 2013
|   |
|--------|

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Days in Session 

These calendars (Congress.gov)  list the days the Senate met for each session of Congress.

Visit the "Sessions of Congress"  web page to find out more about this topic.

### House Calendar 

View the House of Representatives Calendars.

### Senators Phone List 

This list of senators' suite and phone numbers in pdf format is updated every couple of weeks at the beginning of a new Congress.

### Related Links 

Learn about the *Legislative Process and the United States Senate*. (CRS) (PDF)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 16

Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

                                                                 August 18, 2000

Dear Sir/Madam:


         We have read Item 5(b) included in the July 2, 2000 10-QSB of Phoenix
Medical Technology, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and are in agreement with the statements contained therein.


                                                      Very truly yours,


                                                      ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                                      /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


HBD

Copy to:
Mr. Edward W. Gallaher, Sr., Phoenix Medical Technology, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         363,484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    134,816
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               525,426
<PP&E>                                       1,545,246
<DEPRECIATION>                               (149,371)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,268,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          858,039
<BONDS>                                      1,317,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          700,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,691,428
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,268,044
<SALES>                                        540,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               506,960
<CGS>                                          801,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  571,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             377,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,223,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,223,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,223,127)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)



</TABLE>