alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 12015 and # 12016]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Louisiana dated 01/14/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Weather and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         12/10/2009 through 12/18/2009. *Effective Date:*
                         01/14/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/15/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/14/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Parishes:*
                     Lafourche. *Contiguous Parishes:*
                     Louisiana: Assumption, Jefferson, Saint Charles, Saint James, St. John the Baptist, Terrebonne. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.125Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.562Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000( print page 3765)Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12015 6 and for economic injury is 12016 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Louisiana. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: January 14, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-1203 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[File No. 5929.]

#### EMIL KRAUTH, Appellant, v. P. S. JUNGERS and Fred Schwenk, Respondents.

(237 N. W. 778.)

Opinion filed July 6, 1931.

Rehearing denied August 22, 1931.

*Sullivan, Hanley <& Sullivan,*for appellant.

*P.*S. *Jungers*and *Olio Thress,*for respondents.

BubKE, J.

The plaintiff brings this action to redeem from a redemption made by the defendant Schwenk from the foreclosure sale under a first mortgage on the N. E. *{-*of section 15, twp. 139, r. 91 of Stark county, N. D., and to set aside a mortgage on said premises given by defendant Schwenk to the defendant Jungers, after Schwenk had secured a sheriff’s deed to said land on his redemption. The plaintiff claims, he had an agreement with Schwenk to redeem from Schwenk, after the statutory time for redemption had expired; that the defendant Jungers was a party to the agreement and that by reason of the agreement and the conduct of the defendants they are estopped to deny plaintiff’s right to redeem.

The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable'to the defendants upon which judgment was duly entered dismissing the action on the merits from which judgment plaintiff appeals demanding a trial de novo of the entire ease.

*375On tbe 12th day of March 1928, the land involved was-conveyed to the plaintiff. The encumbrance against it at that time was one mortgage to George Mayer, dated December 1, 1922, for the sum of $1200.00, a second mortgage dated on the same day for the amount of $60.00 to the defendant Fred Schwenk, and a third mortgage to the First National Bank of Hebron for the sum of $2390.00 dated January 20, 1927, and a judgment in favor of Fred Schwenk in the sum of $314.11. The first mortgage was foreclosed and the premises were sold on April 28, 1928. On March 30, 1928, plaintiff purchased the mortgage to the First National Bank of Hebron and on the 5th of May, 1928, purchased the certificate of sale executed at the foreclosure sale of the first mortgage, and assigned the samé to the defendant Jungers as security for a loan. On the 22nd of April, 192’8, defendant Schwenk redeemed from the foreclosure sale, and it is conceded that he was a redemptioner and entitled to redeem.

It is the contention of the appellant, first, that by agreement between the plaintiff and defendant, the time for redemption was extended; and second, that if there was no agreement or promise to extend the time of redemption that the defendants were guilty of fraud and deceit amounting to bad faith, and by reason thereof, appellant was prevented from redeeming at the time provided by law.

It is conceded that the appellant did not redeem within the statutory time and the only questions in the case are, first, was there an extension of time? Second, if there was no extension, was there fraud or deceit on the part of the defendant which prevented the appellant from redeeming ? Both questions of fact were decided adversely to appellant by the trial court, and we are of the opinion, that he is amply sustained in the record and the judgment is affirmed.

CiiRiSTiANSON, Ch. J., and Bukr, Nuessle, and Birdzell, JJ., concur.
#### WULF, Respondent, *v.*MANUEL, Appellant.

*Pleading*— Mines *and minerals*— Forfeiture *of mining claim.*— In an action for the possession of a mining claim, a party relying upon a forfeiture by his adversary must specially plead such forfeiture; and the facts constituting the same must be alleged and proved upon the trial.

On rehearing.

Same case reported *ante,*page 279.

De Witt, J.

A statement of this case appears fully in the opinion on the original hearing, and will not be repeated. We now learn that we fell into an error of fact, for w'hich the rehearing was granted. In the record appear the names, Alfred Manuel and Fred Manuel. The similarity of the names, and the fact that Fred is an ordinary abbreviation for Alfred, led us *287to believe that these names repi'esented one person, and that he was called indifferently Alfred and Fred. Our attention is now called to the fact that Alfred was the locator of the Marshal Ney Claim, and that Fred was the person who appears as a link in the chain of plaintiff’s title. With this new light it becomes necessary to add a word to our former opinion.

Appellant contends that Fred Manuel was an alien during all the time that he purported to hold the title. He then takes the position, in his notice of motion for new trial, and in his specifications of error on the motion, and on the appeal, that when title was attempted to be conveyed by the deed from Pfiaume to Fred Manuel a forfeiture took place, and the land escheated to the United States. We do not give any opinion, whether the said attempted conveyance worked a forfeiture or not; but we will assume for the sake of the argument that the appellant’s view of that conveyance is entirely correct, and that it had the effect that he claimed, that is to say, that it worked a forfeiture, and will decide the case on the theory that appellant advances. A party relying upon a forfeiture by his adversary in these contests for the possessory rights to mining claims must specially plead such forfeiture, must set forth the facts constituting the same, and prove them on the trial. The answer in the case denies the plaintiff’s ownership, possession, and right of possession of the premises. It does not specially plead the forfeiture now claimed; it does not set forth the facts constituting the same; it does not inform the plaintiff that a forfeiture is to be urged, or the nature of the acts or omissions working such forfeiture. If defendant intended to rely upon a forfeiture by plaintiff, he has not observed the rules of law governing that plea. He was properly not heard upon that plea in the court below, and cannot be so heard now. *(Dutch Flat Water Co.*v. *Mooney,*12 Cal. 534; *Du Prat*v. *James,*61 Cal. 361; *Morenhaut*v. *Wilson,*52 Cal. 263; *Renshaw*v. *Switzer,*6 Mont. 464; *Garfield M. & M. Co.*v. *Hammer,*6 Mont. 53; *Hopkins*v. *Noyes,*4 Mont. 556.) The order and judgment of the District Court are affirmed.

Harwood, J., concurs.

Blake, C. J., did not sit in the case, being .disqualified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for TLC The Laser Center Inc. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR       
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1,895,000
<SECURITIES>                                     54,234,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10,282,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 71,043,000
<PP&E>                                           58,635,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   16,404,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  164,212,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16,959,000
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                        143,554,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (21,679,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    164,212,000
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 59,122,000
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   (54,763,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (12,727,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (692,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (9,060,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (1,071,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (10,131,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     593,000
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (9,538,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
APPENDIX A: ACTIONS OF THE

JUNE 25, 2012, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the minutes of the April 30, 2012, meeting of the 

Board of Regents. [2012.06.01]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the establishment of an advisory board for the 

Asian Pacific American Program and the proposed bylaws. [2012.06.02]

VOTED that the Board of Regents appoints Sakurako D. Fisher as chair and Robert D. 

MacDonald III as vice chair of the Smithsonian National Board, and reappoints Jane Lipton 

Cafritz, John French III, and William M. Ragland Jr. to the Board, all for three-year terms 

effective October 1, 2012. [2012.06.03]

VOTED that the Board of Regents appoints Carrie Rebora Barratt to the Board of Trustees of the 

Archives of American Art for a three-year term effective immediately. [2012.06.04]

VOTED that the Board of Regents appoints Irene Hirano Inouye and Doris Matsui to the Board 

of Trustees of the Asian Pacific American Program for three-year terms effective immediately. 

[2012.06.05]

VOTED that the Board of Regents reappoints Nancy Marks to Board of Trustees of CooperHewitt, National Design Museum for an exceptional fourth, three-year term, effective 

immediately. [2012.06.06]

VOTED that the Board of Regents presents the Joseph Henry Medal to Cristián Samper in 

recognition of his many contributions to the Smithsonian Institution as the Director of the 

National Museum of Natural History from 2003 to 2012 and as the Acting Secretary of the 

Smithsonian from March 2007 until July 2008. [2012.06.07]

VOTED that the Board of Regents recognizes the generosity of L. Hardwick Caldwell III and his 

wife, Katharine S. Caldwell, to the Smithsonian American Art Museum and its Renwick Gallery 

and names the Hacker and Kitty Caldwell Gallery at the Renwick Gallery in their honor until the 

Renwick Gallery’s next comprehensive renovation. [2012.06.08]

VOTED that the Board of Regents recognizes the generosity of Mars, Incorporated to the 

National Museum of American History, approves the benefits of the sponsorship, and names 

the Mars Hall of American Business for a period of no less than 20 years from the opening of 

the American Enterprise exhibition. [2012.06.09]

VOTED that the Board of Regents nominates Barbara Barrett of Paradise Valley, Arizona, to 

succeed Alan G. Spoon as a Citizen Regent on the Board of Regents and to serve a statutory 

term of six years, effective immediately. Furthermore, the Board asks its congressional 

members to introduce and support legislation to this effect as soon as possible. [2012.06.10]
EXHIBIT 21
                                                                    Subsidiaries

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                                Jurisdiction of
                                                                 Incorporation
Name of Subsidiary                                              or Organization
-------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------

Minghua Group International Holding (Hong Kong) Ltd.              Hong Kong

Minghua Acquisition Corp.                                         Delaware

Shenzhen Minghua Environmental Protection Vehicles Co. Ltd.        China

Ming Hua Environmental Protection Science and Technology Ltd.    Hong Kong

Good View Bus Manufacturing (Holding) Co. Ltd.                   Hong Kong

Eagle Bus Development Ltd.                                       Hong Kong

Guangzhou City View Bus Installation Co. Ltd.                      China

Euromax International Investments Limited                        Hong Kong

Beijing China Cardinal Real Estate Consulting Co., Ltd             China

Keytop Holding Limited                                           Hong Kong

Top Team holdings Limited                                 British Virgin Islands

Asia Key Group Limited                                    British Virgin Islands
#### William H. Kidd, administrator, plaintiff in error, *vs.*George H. Lester, administrator, defendant in error.

A widow, who has no children, living with her, dependent on her for support, is not entitled to a homestead out of the property of her deceased husband, as the head of a family, according to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution of 1868. (R.)

Homestead. Widow. Head of a family. Before Judge Andrews. Oglethorpe Superior Court. October Adiourned Term, 1871.

For the facts of this ease, see the decision.

W. G. Johnson ; W. W. McLester, for plaintiff in error.

The widow is entitled to the homestead: 40 Ga. R., 558; *Ibid.,*440; 15 Ga. R., 411; Code, sec. 2022; 1 Wash, on R. P., 325, *et seq.;*39 Ga. R., 437; 40 Ga. R., 486; Code, sec. 1747; 8 Cal. R., 71; 14 Cal. R., 476; 16 Cal. R., 217; 5 Min. R., 337; 7 Min. R., 520; 32 Tenn. R., 514; 7 Texas R., 19.

J. D. Mathews, for defendant.

A single person, with no one dependent upon him or her, is not the head of a family: 42 Ga. R., 405; 41 Ga. R., 153; 40 Ga. R., 173.

*232Warner, Chief Justice.

The only question made by the record in this case is whether a widow, who has no children living with her dependent on her for support, is entitled to a homestead out of the property of her deceased husband, as the head of a family, according to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution of 1868. The manifest intention of the Constitution was to provide for the families of minor children, and to authorize the applicant to have a homestead he or she must be the head of a family, or guardian, or trustee of a family of minor children, and this intention is the more apparent because it is made the duty of the General Assembly, by the Constitution, to provide, by law, for the setting apart the homestead for the *sole use and benefit of said families,*as aforesaid, but not for the use and benefit of those who have no families whom they are legally bound to support. In our judgment, the applicant, under the statement of facts contained in the record, was not entitled to a homestead in the property of her deceased husband as the head of a family, as contemplated by the Constitution : *Lynch vs. Pace,*40 *Georgia Reports, 17*3; *Calhoun vs. McLendon,*42 *Georgia Reports, 405.*

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**











Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) I,
      Harinder Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
                February 13, 2008By:
                \s\*Harinder Dhillon*Harinder
                Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal
                Executive Officer)








This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, [NRC-2010-0002].

# DATE:

Week of May 24, 2010.

# PLACE:

Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

# STATUS:

Public and Closed.

# ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Week of May 24, 2010

### Thursday, May 27, 2010

9:25 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative).

a. South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Co. (South Texas Project Units 3 and 4), Intervenors' Notice of Appeal, Brief in Support of Intervenors' Appeal of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Order of January 29, 2010 (Feb. 9, 2010) (Tentative).

                    This meeting will be Webcast live at the Web address—                    *http://www.nrc.gov.*

* * * * *

                    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at:                     *http://www.nrc.gov/​about-nrc/​policy-making/​schedule.html.*

* * * * *

                    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (                    *e.g.*, braille, large print), please notify Angela Bolduc, Chief, Employee/Labor Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301-492-2230, TDD: 301-415-2100, or by e-mail at                     *angela.bolduc@nrc.gov.*                     Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.                

* * * * *

                    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1969),                           ( print page 28304)                        or send an e-mail to                     *darlene.wright@nrc.gov.*

Dated: May 17, 2010.

Rochelle C. Bavol,

Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-12224 Filed 5-18-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHEILA M. BRONSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 355 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHEILA M. BRONSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 356 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
4.13 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

lfomoreblo HA Eodgor 

amnty Attdltor ulll.lu8on ceuaty oeorget4mt,ea8 

Deer, 8irt 

de br him In gethe defendant? 

the 8bovo utd mlated 

P *B follarrt 

dehadant lrlth 

lc’ tried in the 

ld in Ww jurtloo 

ed end rernrrr hlr 

‘3. Doer the hot tbst the earukble gee8 out 

Of th0 OOUXtw t0 -0 tb0 W88t &vtW th8 tiSw 

WeiawnJtR 
1.14 
115 

Wom~hetVehav8 uidaboveaad iaO$iafoaNo. O-1081, 

it b8-8 WM8urJr t0 &a8VO, pour' 8000Rkd 01, third ~W8tiiaar. 

lh8tlag uut thl8 Utf8frOtOPf~~ 4nmrer8 swp inatim, V8 l 6