94th C ongress, 2d S essio n S en a te D ocu m en t No. 94-14 5

VETO—S. 2350

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT 0E THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

WITHOUT MY APPROVAL S. 2350, A BILL “TO AMEND THE

NATIONAL SECURITY ACT OF 1947, AS AMENDED, TO INCLUDE THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY AS A MEMBER

OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL”

D ecember 31, 1975.—Received

J a n u a r y 19,1976.— Ordered to be printed

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

57-011 WASHINGTON : 1976
To the Senate of the United States: I return without my approval S. 2350, a bill “To amend the National Security Act of 1047, as amended, to include the Secretary of the Treasury as a member of the National Security Council.” The National Security Council is one of the most important or­ ganizations in the Executive Oflice of the President. The Council’s {‘unction, under the law, is to advise the President with respect to the integration of domestic, foreign, and military policies relating to the national security. The President, the Vice President, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Defense are the statutory members of the. Council. In addition, the President may, under the law, appoint by and with the advice and consent of the Senate the Secretaries and Under Secretaries of other executive departments and of the military depart­ ments to serve at his pleasure. No President has ever exercised this la ttcr authority. In mv judgment, enactment of S. 2350 is not necessary. From its establishment in 1047, each President has invited from time to time additional officers to participate in National Security Council delibera­ tions when matters specifically relating to their responsibilities have been considered. In line with this practice, the President invites the Secretary of the Treasury to participate in Council affairs when issues of substantial interest to the Department of the Treasury are in­ volved. Thus, existing arrangements provide for adequate participa­ tion of: the Secretary of the Treasury in National Security Council matters. Furthermore, additional mechanisms exist to assure that the Presi­ dent receives advice which takes into account the proper integration and coordination of domestic and international economic policy with foreign policy and national security objectives. Both the Economic Policy Board and the Council for International Economic Policy pro­ vide the President with high level advice on economic matters. The Secretary of the Treasury is the Chairman of these two bodies on which the Secretary of State also serves. I believe that S. 2350 is undesirable as well as unnecessary. The proper concerns of the National Security Council extend substantially beyond the statutory responsibilities and focus of the Secretary of the Treasury. Most issues that come before the Council on a regular basis do not have significant economic and monetary implications. Moreover, a large number of executive departments and agencies have key responsibilities for programs affecting international economic policy. From time to time these programs influence importantly our foreign polic}7 and national security decisions. The Treasury Depart­ ment does not and could not represent all those interests. Extending full statutory membership on the National Security Council to the Secretary of the Treasury would not achieve the purpose of bringing to bear on decisions the full range of international economic consid­ erations.

(i)

S.D. 145
2

For these several reasons, I am concerned that increasing the statu­ tory membership of the Council might well diminish its flexibility and usefulness as a most important advisory mechanism for the President. In sum, S. 2350 is unnecessary, since adequate arrangements for providing advice to the President on the integration of economic and foreign policy already exist, and it is undesirable because the proposed arrangement is inconsistent with the purposes of the National Security Council and would lessen the current and desirable flexibility of the President in arranging for advice on the broad spectrum of interna­ tional and national security policy matters.

Gerald K. F ord.

Tiik W h it e H ouse, December 3L 1975.

S.D. 145