Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 27925 

enter into a covered nonprocurement 

transaction. 

§ 2000.30 What policies and procedures 

must I follow? 

(a) The NRC policies and procedures 

that you must follow are the policies 

and procedures specified in each 

applicable section of the OMB guidance 

in Subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 

180, and those in this part. The NRC has 

closely tracked OMB’s numbering 

scheme. For example, the contracts 

under a nonprocurement transaction 

that are covered transactions that are in 

section 220 of the OMB guidance (i.e., 

2 CFR 180.220) are found in § 2000.220. 

(b) For any section of OMB guidance 

in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 

180 that has no corresponding section in 

this part, NRC requirements are those in 

the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 180. 

§ 2000.135 Who in the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission may grant an exception to let 

an excluded person participate in a covered 

transaction? 

The Director, Office of Administration 

or another official designated by the 

Director, has the authority to grant a 

written exception to let an excluded 

person participate in a covered 

transaction, as provided in guidance at 

2 CFR 180.135. The Director or other 

official designated by the Director shall 

explain the reason(s) for deviating from 

the governmentwide policy. 

Subpart B—Covered Transactions 

§ 2000.220 What contracts and 

subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 

2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions? 

The NRC nonprocurement suspension 

and debarment requirements apply only 

to first-tier procurement contracts under 

a covered nonprocurement transaction. 

Subpart C—Responsibilities of 

Participants Regarding Transactions 

§ 2000.330 What method must be used to 

pass requirements down to participants at 

lower tiers? 

A participant in a covered transaction 

must include a term or condition in any 

lower-tier covered transaction to require 

the participant of that transaction to— 

(a) Comply with subpart C of the OMB 

guidance in 2 CFR part 180; and 

(b) Include a similar term or condition 

in any covered transaction into which it 

enters at the next lower tier. 

Subpart E–H [Reserved] 

Subpart I—Definitions 

§ 2000.930 Debarring official. 

The Debarring Official for the United 

States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

is the Director, Office of Administration. 

§ 2000.1010 Suspending official. 

The suspending official for the United 

States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

is the Director, Office of Administration. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day 

of April 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

R.W. Borchardt, 

Executive Director for Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11844 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Food Safety and Inspection Service 

9 CFR Part 381 

[Docket No. FSIS–2007–0045] 

Use of Turkey Shackle in Bar-Type Cut 

Operations; Correcting Amendment 

AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection 

Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Correcting amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Food Safety and 

Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending 

the Federal poultry products inspection 

regulations to correct an inadvertent 

error in the required shackle width for 

Bar-type cut turkey operations that use 

J-type cut maximum line speeds. 

DATES: This amendment is effective May 

19, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick Burke, Risk and Innovations 

Management Division, Office of Policy 

and Program Development, FSIS, U.S. 

Department of Agriculture, Room 2– 

2118 George Washington Carver Center, 

5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Beltsville, MD 

20705, (301) 504–0843. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

September 8, 2008, FSIS published a 

final rule that provides that turkey 

slaughter establishments that open 

turkey carcasses with Bar-type cuts may 

operate at the maximum line speeds 

established for J-type cuts if they use a 

shackle with a 4-inch by 4-inch selector 

(or kickout), a 45 degree bend of the 

lower 2 inches, an extended central loop 

portion of the shackle that lowers the 

abdominal cavity opening of the 

carcasses to an angle of 30 degrees from 

the vertical in direct alignment with the 

inspector’s view, and a width of 10.5 

inches (73 FR 51899). The specified 

shackle width of 10.5 inches is a 

typographical error, and the correct 

width is 10 inches. This notice corrects 

the error and amends § 381.68 to specify 

the correct 10-inch shackle width for 

Bar-type cut turkey operations that use 

J-type cut maximum line speeds. 

Additional Public Notification 

Public awareness of all segments of 

rulemaking and policy development is 

important. Consequently, in an effort to 

ensure that minorities, women, and 

persons with disabilities are aware of 

this proposed rule, FSIS will announce 

it online through the FSIS Web page 

located at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ 

Regulations_&_Policies/ 

2010_Notices_Index/index.asp. FSIS 

will also make copies of this Federal 

Register publication available through 

the FSIS Constituent Update, which is 

used to provide information regarding 

FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, 

Federal Register notices, FSIS public 

meetings, and other types of information 

that could affect or would be of interest 

to constituents and stakeholders. The 

Update is communicated via Listserv, a 

free electronic mail subscription service 

for industry, trade groups, consumer 

interest groups, health professionals, 

and other individuals who have asked 

to be included. The Update is also 

available on the FSIS Web page. 

Through the Listserv and Web page, 

FSIS is able to provide information to a 

much broader and more diverse 

audience. In addition, FSIS offers an email subscription service which 

provides automatic and customized 

access to selected food safety news and 

information. This service is available at 

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ 

news_and_events/email_subscription/. 

Options range from recalls to export 

information to regulations, directives 

and notices. Customers can add or 

delete subscriptions themselves, and 

have the option to password protect 

their accounts. 

List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 381 

Poultry product inspection, Postmortem. 

■ For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, 9 CFR part 381 is corrected by 

making the following correcting 

amendment: 

PART 381—POULTRY PRODUCTS 

INSPECTION REGULATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 381 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
27926 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

§ 381.68 [Corrected] 

■ 2. In § 381.68, the second sentence of 

paragraph (a) is amended by removing 

‘‘10.5’’ and adding in its place ‘‘10’’. 

Done at Washington, DC, on May 13, 2010. 

Alfred V. Almanza, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11996 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

10 CFR Part 430 

[Docket No. EERE–2010–BT–NOA–0016] 

Notice of Availability of Interpretive 

Rule on the Applicability of Current 

Water Conservation Standards for 

Showerheads; Request for Comments 

AGENCY: Department of Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of availability and 

request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE) or (the Department) is 

providing notice of an interpretive rule 

that sets out the Department’s views on 

the definition of ‘‘showerhead’’ in the 

DOE’s regulations related to the energy 

conservation program for consumer 

products. The draft interpretive rule 

represents the Department’s 

interpretation of its existing regulations 

and is exempt from the notice and 

comment requirements of the 

Administrative Procedure Act. See 5 

U.S.C. 553(b)(A). Nevertheless, given 

that the Department has not previously 

expressed its views on this definition, 

we are interested in receiving feedback 

from the public on the interpretation. At 

the end of the comment period, this 

draft interpretive rule may be adopted, 

revised or withdrawn. 

DATES: Comments regarding this draft 

interpretive rule must be received on or 

before June 18, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted to DOE using the following 

method: 

• E-mail: Showerhead_Guidance_

Comments@hq.doe.gov. Include the 

docket number in the subject line of the 

message. Comments and suggestions 

should be provided in WordPerfect, 

Microsoft Word, PDF, or text file format. 

The full text of the interpretive rule is 

available at http://

www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ 

appliance_standards/residential/pdfs/ 

showerhead_guidance.pdf. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information 

should be directed to Ms. Laura Barhydt 

laura.barhydt@hq.doe.gov or by phone 

at 202–287–5772. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. 

Department of Energy (DOE) or (the 

Department) is providing notice of an 

interpretive rule that sets out the 

Department’s views on the definition of 

‘‘showerhead’’ in 10 CFR 430.2. The 

draft interpretive rule represents the 

Department’s interpretation of its 

existing regulations and is exempt from 

the notice and comment requirements of 

the Administrative Procedure Act. See 5 

U.S.C. 553(b)(A). Nevertheless, given 

that the Department has not previously 

expressed its views on this definition, 

we are interested in receiving feedback 

from the public on the interpretation. At 

the end of the comment period, this 

draft interpretive rule may be adopted, 

revised or withdrawn. The full text of 

the interpretive rule is available at 

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ 

appliance_standards/residential/pdfs/ 

showerhead_guidance.pdf. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291 and 42 U.S.C. 

6298. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 10, 

2010. 

Scott Blake Harris, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11572 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No. NM420; Special Conditions No. 

25–406–SC] 

Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation 

Falcon Model 2000EX; Autobraking 

System 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions. 

SUMMARY: These special conditions are 

issued for the Dassault Aviation Falcon 

Model 2000EX airplane. This airplane 

will have a novel or unusual design 

feature(s) associated with the 

autobraking system for use during 

landing. The applicable airworthiness 

regulations do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for this 

design feature. These special conditions 

contain the additional safety standards 

that the Administrator considers 

necessary to establish a level of safety 

equivalent to that established by the 

existing airworthiness standards. 

DATES: Effective Date: June 18, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Todd Martin, FAA, Airframe/Cabin 

Safety, ANM–115, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification 

Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 

Renton, Washington, 98057–3356; 

telephone (425) 227–1178; facsimile 

(425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2008, Dassault Aviation 

applied for a change to Type Certificate 

(TC) No. A50NM to install an automatic 

braking system on the Falcon Model 

2000EX airplane. This is a pilotselectable function that allows earlier 

maximum braking at landing without 

pilot pedal input. When the autobrake 

system is armed before landing, it 

automatically commands maximum 

braking at main wheels touchdown. 

Normal procedures remain unchanged 

and call for manual braking after nose 

wheel touchdown. 

The current Federal Aviation 

Regulations do not contain adequate 

requirements to address the potentially 

higher structural loads that could result 

from this type of automatic braking 

system. Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) 25.471 through 

25.511 address ground handling loads, 

but do not contain a specific ‘‘pitchover’’ 

requirement addressing the loading on 

the nose gear, the nose gear surrounding 

structure, and the forward fuselage. The 

Dassault autobraking system, which 

applies maximum braking at the main 

wheels before the nose gear touches 

down, will cause a high nose gear sink 

rate, and potentially higher gear and 

airframe loads. Therefore, the FAA has 

determined that a special condition is 

needed. The special condition requires 

that the airplane be designed to 

withstand the loads resulting from 

maximum braking, taking into account 

the effects of the automatic braking 

system. 

Type Certification Basis 

Under the provisions of 14 CFR 

21.101, Dassault Aviation must show 

that the Falcon Model 2000EX, as 

changed, continues to meet the 

applicable provisions of the regulations 

incorporated by reference in TC No. 

A50NM or the applicable regulations in 

effect on the date of application for the 

change. The regulations incorporated by 

reference in the type certificate are 

commonly referred to as the ‘‘original 

type certification basis.’’ The regulations 

incorporated by reference in TC No. 

A50NM are as follows: Part 25 of 14 

CFR as amended by Amendments 25–1 

through 25–69. In addition, Dassault 

Aviation has elected to comply with the 

following amendments: 

• Amendment 25–71 for § 25.365(e). 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES