Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-20577

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AGUSTIN GONZALEZ-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-191-1

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Agustin Gonzalez-Mendoza appeals the 40-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to transport and harbor

unlawful aliens. See 8 U.S.C. § 1324. He contends the district court erred by

finding his offense involved 25–99 unlawful aliens and imposing the resulting

six-level enhancement to his offense level. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(2)(B). 

Although post-Booker, the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory only, and

an ultimate sentence is reviewed for reasonableness under an abuse-ofUnited States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 25, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-20577 Document: 00511120533 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/25/2010
No. 09-20577

2

discretion standard, the district court must still properly calculate the guidelinesentencing range for use in deciding on the sentence to impose. Gall v. United

States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). In that respect, its application of the guidelines

is reviewed de novo; its factual findings, only for clear error. E.g., United States

v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v.

Villegas, 404 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we review only for clear

error the challenged factual finding that Gonzalez was responsible for at least

25 unlawful aliens.

As the presentence investigation report (PSR) noted, Gonzalez stated he

was paid $300 for each load of aliens. He did not receive the money at first;

rather, it was deducted from the $2,200 he owed for his own smuggling fee (he

entered illegally in December 2008). Gonzalez received $3,000 beyond that

repayment, and he conceded he had been working off his debt for several months

before he was arrested. Gonzalez also admitted that, beginning in February

2009, one to two loads of two to ten unlawful aliens arrived weekly.

Additionally, the PSR included information from which the district court could

determine that at least some of the loads exceeded the minimum of two unlawful

aliens and that some of the unlawful aliens from those loads had been released;

thus, the 17 found at the time of Gonzalez’s arrest did not constitute the total

number of aliens for which Gonzalez was responsible. In sum, information in

the PSR supported the district court’s finding Gonzalez responsible for at least

25 unlawful aliens.

Because Gonzalez failed to provide rebuttal evidence, the district court

was entitled to rely on the information in the PSR. E.g., United States v. Ford,

558 F.3d 371, 377 (5th Cir. 2009) (“In making its factual findings for sentencing,

a district court may adopt the findings of the PSR without additional inquiry if

those facts have an evidentiary basis with sufficient indicia of reliability and the

defendant does not present rebuttal evidence or otherwise demonstrate that the

information is materially unreliable.” (quoting United States v. Valles, 484 F.3d

Case: 09-20577 Document: 00511120533 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/25/2010
No. 09-20577

3

745, 759 (5th Cir. 2007))). In that regard, the district court’s determination that

Gonzalez was responsible for 25 or more unlawful aliens was plausible in the

light of the record as a whole and, therefore, was not clearly erroneous. E.g.,

United States v. Betancourt, 422 F.3d 240, 245–46 (5th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 09-20577 Document: 00511120533 Page: 3 Date Filed: 05/25/2010