alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>







                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  December  31, 2009 (the  "Report") I, Louie
Ucciferri,  Corporate  Secretary,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18USC ss.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Date: February 18, 2010

                                    By: \s\Louie Ucciferri
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Louie Ucciferri, Corporate Secretary,
                                    Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7623

GLENN LEE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:95-cr-00136-F-3; 5:98-cv-513-F) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 5, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenn Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Wolcott Corkhill, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Glenn Lee Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsMirant Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-130935) on Form S-8 of Mirant Corporation of our reports dated February 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Mirant Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Mirant Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, GeorgiaFebruary 28, 2007

 

----
EXHIBIT 23 (ii)

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


Health Care Centers of America, Inc.

     I hereby consent to the use of my report dated April 18, 1997, in the Form
10-KSB annual report of Health Care Centers of America, Inc., filed on Form
10-KSB in accordance with Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

     I also consent to my report referred to above being considered as
comprehending my opinion that the supplemental schedules of Health Care Centers
of America. Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31. 1995 and 1996 and for
each of the two years then ended, included in such annual report, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements, present
fairly in all material respects the information shown therein.


                                                  /s/ W. Dale McGhie
                                                  -------------------
                                                  W. Dale McGhie, CPA


Reno, Nevada
April 22, 1997
#### Patrick Kennedy v. John Wanamaker, New York.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,194,857
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            14,700,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 50,214,151
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      54,749,422
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        54,718,950
<LOANS>                                     41,433,923
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,029,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             118,736,593
<DEPOSITS>                                  87,768,908
<SHORT-TERM>                                24,101,680
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            562,552
<LONG-TERM>                                    900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,615,797
<COMMON>                                       336,760
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,450,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,403,453
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,919,127
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,640,092
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               462,991
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,022,210
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             840,527
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,359,580
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,662,630
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,622,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                468,503
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     468,503
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   468,503
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    396,264
<LOANS-PAST>                                   952,260
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                945,202
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,174,888
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  258,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    23,007
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,029,895
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,029,895
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        475,000



</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.2

    

    ADVANCED
MESSAGING SOLUTIONS INC.

    (the
“Company”)

     

    FOUNDER’S SHARE
SUBSCRIPTION 

     

    The
undersigned (the “Subscriber”) acknowledges and agrees that:

     

    
      
        	
                1.

              	
                the
      Subscriber is a founder of the
Company;

              


      

    

     

    
      
        	
                2.

              	
                the
      Subscriber subscribes for seven hundred and fifty thousand (750,000)
      common shares (the
      “Shares”) in the authorized capital of the Company at a price of US $0.01
      per Share, and agrees to pay the purchase price for the Shares prior to
      their issuance;

              


      

    

     

    
      
        	
                3.

              	
                the
      Subscriber has been advised to consult the Subscriber’s own legal, tax and
      other advisors with respect to the merits and risks of an investment in
      the Shares and with respect to applicable resale restrictions, and the
      Subscriber is solely responsible (and the Company is not in any way
      responsible) for compliance
with:

              


      

    

     

    
      
        	
              	
                (a)

              	
                any
      applicable laws of the jurisdiction in which the Subscriber is resident in
      connection with the distribution of the Shares hereunder,
    and

              


      

    

     

    
      
        	
              	
                (b)

              	
                applicable
      resale restrictions. 

              


      

      Dated as
of the 27th day of
December, 2007.

    

     

    
      
        
          
            	 
      	
                    /s/
      Jaime Brodeth

                  
	 
      	
                    JAIME
      BRODETH

                  


          

        

      

    

     

    INFORMATION
REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION:

     

    

      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    
                      
                        
                          	
                                  Full
      name:

                                	 
      
	
                                  Jaime
      Brodeth

                                	 
      
	 	 
	
                                  Residential
      Address:

                                	 
      
	 	 
	
                                  Unit 3-B, Torres Building

                                	 
      
	 	 
	
                                  5115 Malolos St.

                                	 
      
	 	 
	
                                  Makati
      City, Philippines
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oxford ResidentialProperties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chiefexecutive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalentof the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-117594, 333-106607and 333-05893, Form SB-2 No. 333-122123, Form S-3No. 333-110779, and Form S-4 No. 333-102115),of CardioTech International, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of ourreport dated June 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of CardioTech International, Inc., included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2006.
|                       |   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Boston, Massachusetts |   |                           |   |   |
| June 26, 2006    |   |                           |   |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

                                    CONSENT

We have issued our reports dated October 3, 1996, except for Note 20, which is
now incorporated into the second paragraph of Note 12, the date of which is
January 13, 1997, accompanying the financial statements and schedules of Doctors
Health, Inc. (formerly Doctors Health System, Inc.) contained in this 10-K. We
consent to the use of the aforementioned reports in this Form 10-K and
incorporation by reference of our report in the Company's previously filed S-1
Registration Statement File No. 333-1926.

/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP
_______________________


Baltimore, Maryland
September 25, 1998
Slip Op. 15-9 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge
Court No. 11-00319

JUDGMENT Upon consideration of the stipulation to settle this action entered into by Plaintiffs and Defendant, ECF No. 90, that no party has filed an objection, and all other papers and proceedings had in this action; and upon due deliberation, it is hereby ORDERED that judgment is entered in accordance with the stipulation of settlement by the parties; it is further ORDERED that, within 30 days of entry of this judgment, the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) shall issue for publication in the Federal Register amended final results of the administrative review at issue in this action, originally published as Certain Circular Welded Non- Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico, 76 Fed. Reg. 36,086 (Dep’t of Commerce June 21, 2011) (final admin. review), setting the weighted-average dumping margin for Mueller Comercial de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. at 13.70 percent for the period of review; it is further ORDERED that, within 15 days after the Federal Register publication of the amended final results, Commerce shall issue inst ructions to United States Customs and Border Protection to liquidate the subject entries in accordance with the amended final results at the importer-specific assessment rate contained in the stipulation of settlement and this judgment; it is further ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see Mueller Comercial de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. v. United States, Court No. 11-00319 (CIT Aug. 24, 2011), ECF No. 8 (prelim. inj. order), must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012); and it is further MUELLER COMERCIAL DE MEXICO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.,

Plaintiffs,
v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.Court No. 11-00319 Page 2

ORDERED that each party shall bear their own attorney fees, costs, and expenses.
/s/ Leo M. Gordon Judge Leo M. Gordon Dated: January 28, 2015 New York, New York
EXHIBIT 32.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John E. Balzarini,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:    November 9, 2006                    /s/ John E. Balzarini
                                             ---------------------
                                             John E. Balzarini
                                             Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 10-19]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-19 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: May 11, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## Transmittal No. 10-19

      ( print page 27315)          ( print page 27316)          ( print page 27317)          ( print page 27318)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-11581 Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-99777 and 333-99777-01 of Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership
and Crescent Finance Company of our report dated January 31, 2003, with respect
to the Individual and Combined financial statements of The Woodlands Land
Development Company, L.P., The Woodlands Commercial Properties Company, L.P.,
and The Woodlands Operating Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 24, 2003
[Cite as State v. Meyer , 2015-Ohio-355.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, :

-vs- : CASE NO: 2014-P-0046 JOHN A. MEYER, III, : Defendant-Appellant. :

Criminal Appeal from the Portage County Municipal Court, Ravenna Division. Case No. R 2014 TRD 2935. Judgment: Appeal dismissed. Victor V. Vigluicci , Portage County Prosecutor, and Kristina Drnjevich , Assistant Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). John A. Meyer, III, pro se, 8969 Applewood Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45236 (DefendantAppellant).

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P. J., {¶1} On July 22, 2014, appellant, John A. Meyer, III, filed his notice of appeal, pro se, from a June 20, 2014 judgment entry issued by the Portage County Municipal Court, Ravenna Division. The June 20, 2014 judgment entry reflects that appellant pleaded guilty to an amended charge of speeding and was sentenced to a fine of $100, plus court costs. {¶2} App.R. 4(A) states in part: “A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed. * *

*.”2 {¶3} In this case, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on July 20, 2014, a Sunday and, therefore, it was to be filed the following day, Monday, July 21, 2014. Appellant, however, did not file his notice of appeal until Tuesday, July 22, 2014. {¶4} App.R. 5(A) states, in relevant part: {¶5} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the filing of a notice of appeal as of righ t, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: {¶6} “(a) Criminal proceedings; {¶7} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and {¶8} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings. {¶9} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion , the movant shall file with the clerk of the trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals. * * *.” {¶10} In the present case, appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R. 4(A) nor sought leave from this court to appeal, pursuant to App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal. {¶11} Based upon the foregoing analysis, the appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed as being untimely. {¶12} Appeal dismissed.

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J., COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J.,

concur.