alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          65,678
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    439,332
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,181,128
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,103,815
<LOANS>                                      4,583,066
<ALLOWANCE>                                     48,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,593,880
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,046,499
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,132,760
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            155,213
<LONG-TERM>                                    896,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              143
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     362,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,593,880
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                188,926
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               56,133
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               245,059
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             106,749
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             168,335
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           76,724
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,091
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 60,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,931
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      23,108
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.54
<LOANS-NON>                                     35,170
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                14,549
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                48,541
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,502
<RECOVERIES>                                       203
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               48,695
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            13,995
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         34,700
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000744106
<NAME> FEDDERS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                            5,751
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    39,134
<ALLOWANCES>                     (2,135)
<INVENTORY>                     133,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                183,912
<PP&E>                          121,722
<DEPRECIATION>                  (57,664)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  316,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           114,032
<BONDS>                          37,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                       7,517
<COMMON>                         40,908
<OTHER-SE>                       97,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    316,949
<SALES>                          93,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 93,680
<CGS>                            72,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    90,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   (457)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1,916
<INCOME-TAX>                        651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,265
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      1,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0
        

</TABLE>
NO.

WILLIAM GRANT DORSETT § IN THE

§

VS. § COURT OF CRIMINAL AEREALS^rHi 1M

STATE OF TEXAS § AUSTIN, TEXAS ^Qy^QFCK^' ftPPSALS

MAY 0 4 2015

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW Abe!Ac0fita.Cldrk

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes WILLIAM GRANT DORSETT, Appellant in the above styled and

numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension oftime to file a pRii£c© |^

for discretionary review, pursuant to Rule 68.2( C) and 10.5(b) ofthe Texas Rules or AI"^EALS

Appellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 173rd District Court of Ifesld^gg®^ Cierk

County, Texas.

2. The case in the trial court was styled the State ofTexas v. William Grant

Dorsett, and numbered B-19,825

3. The case appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals in Tyler, Texas and

assigned number 12-14-00027-CR. The Court of Appeals issued an

opinion on March 31, 2015. .

4. Appellant was convicted of Theft by Deception and was assessed a

sentence ofthree (3) years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice -

Institutional Division.

5. The petition for discretionary review is presently due by April 30, 2015.

Appellant is currently representing himselfand needs an additional sixty

(60) days to prepare his Petition for Discretionary Review.

6. Defendant is out on an appeal bond set by the trial court.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES. CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this Court

grant this Motion To Extend Time to File the Petition for Discretionary Review, and
for such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

William Grant Dorsett

1931 CR 1032

Greenville, Texas 75401

903-714-8778

By: /aJiKUI

William Grant Dorsett, Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This isto certify that on /IfU^Pj^rH .V. 2015, a true and correct copy

of the above and foregoing document was served on Scott McKee, Henderson County

District Attorney, 109 West Corsicana Street, Suite 103, Athens, Texas 75751, by

certified mail, return receipt requested.

imam Grant Dorsetvrro Se
STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF SMITH

§

§

§

AFFIDAVIT

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared

James W. Huggler, Jr., who after being duly sworn stated:

"I am the attorney for the appellant in the above numbered and entitled

cause. I have read the foregoing Motion To Extend Time to File Petition

for Discretionary Review and swear that all of the allegations of fact

contained therein are true and correct."

William Grant Dorsett, Pro Se

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on this the day of

2015, to certify which witness my hand and seal of office.

^-..,.w, AMIE JANE GONZALEZ

nWTl No,a'V PuWic. State ofTexas

*-*xf\.ht My Commission Expifes

July 19.2016

b

Notary Public, State of

My Commission expire
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2019

No. 04-18-00852-CV

IN RE ANDERSON COLUMBIA CO., INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On March 27, 2019, the real parties in interest filed a Motion for Emergency Relief. 

After considering the motion, all relief requested in the motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on March 27, 2019.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, 

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15-03-31056-MCV, styled Jerold Givens, et al. v. Salatiel Polanco, et al., 

pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas. The Honorable Gloria Saldana signed the 

complained-of order.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 217

_____________________________ S TACY M ARIE Y ORK ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction.

October 26, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
T he petition for writ of certiorari is D ENIED on the merits.

L EWIS , M AKAR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, Elizabeth Hogan Webb, Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonvil le
, for Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Steven E. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
#### Sarah Schwartz, as Administratrix, etc., v. Minnie Lippman, as Administratrix, etc., and Others.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
* This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Fortress Group, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet as of Dec. 31, 1998 and The
Fortress Group, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended
Dec. 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001010607
<NAME>                        THE FORTRESS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         23,102
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    310,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         13,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 449,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       122
<OTHER-SE>                                     91,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   449,903
<SALES>                                        693,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               692,645
<CGS>                                          583,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  663,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,951)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21,628
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8,794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,834
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .42
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1728

YAN LIN,

Petitioner,

versus

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A98-595-532)

Submitted: January 10, 2008 Decided: January 25, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Zhang, ZHANG & ASSOCIATES, New York, New York, for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Mark C.

Walters, Assistant Director, Jeffrey R. Meyer, Office of

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

Lin does not challenge on appeal the denial of protection

under the Convention Against Torture. We therefore find that she

has waived appellate review of this claim. See Edwards v. City of

Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Yan Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of

China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her

requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

the Convention Against Torture.* Lin challenges the Board’s

finding that her testimony was not credible and that she otherwise

failed to meet her burden of proof to qualify for asylum. We will

uphold a negative credibility determination if it is supported by

substantial evidence, see Tewabe v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 533, 538

(4th Cir. 2006), and reverse the Board’s decision only if the

evidence “was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could

fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” Rusu v. INS, 296

F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (internal quotations and

citations omitted).

We have reviewed the administrative record and the

Board’s decision and find that substantial evidence supports the

adverse credibility finding and the ruling that Lin failed to

establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future

persecution as necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See

8 U.S.C.A. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(I), (ii) (West 2005) (providing that the
- 3 -

burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for

asylum); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2007) (same). Similarly, because

Lin does not qualify for asylum, she is not entitled to withholding

of removal. See Dankam v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir.

2007).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  (in thousands)
 Year Ended December 31,2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005Consolidated pretax (loss) income
from continuing operations
    
    $
    80,494
    
    
    $
    88,163
    
    
    $
    97,153
    
    
    $
    80,456
    
    
    $
    126,213Share of pretax income of 50%
owned affiliate net of equity
pick-up
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Share of distributed (income) loss
of less-than-50%-owned
affiliates net of equity pick-up
    
    
    1,690
    
    
    
    98
    
    
    
    3,516
    
    
    
    (1,688
    )
    
    
    7,210Share of pretax loss of less-than-
50%-owned affiliate with
guaranteed debt net of equity
pick-up
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    345
    
    
    
    321
    
    
    
    220
    
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    35Interest
    
    
    43,922
    
    
    
    42,911
    
    
    
    28,191
    
    
    
    12,383
    
    
    
    10,991Less interest capitalized during the
period
    
    
    (5,439
    )
    
    
    (7,453
    )
    
    
    (2,751
    )
    
    
    (5,314
    )
    
    
    (7,473
    )Net amortization of debt discount
and premium and issuance
expense
    
    
    3,488
    
    
    
    5,292
    
    
    
    6,517
    
    
    
    2,018
    
    
    
    1,483Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    4,156
    
    
    
    3,582
    
    
    
    12,203
    
    
    
    15,131
    
    
    
    15,316Earnings
    
    $
    128,656
    
    
    $
    132,914
    
    
    $
    145,049
    
    
    $
    103,040
    
    
    $
    153,775Interest
    
    
    43,922
    
    
    
    42,911
    
    
    
    28,191
    
    
    
    12,383
    
    
    
    10,991Net amortization of debt discount
and premium and issuance
expense
    
    
    3,488
    
    
    
    5,292
    
    
    
    6,517
    
    
    
    2,018
    
    
    
    1,483Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    4,156
    
    
    
    3,582
    
    
    
    12,203
    
    
    
    15,131
    
    
    
    15,316Interest expense relating to
guaranteed debt of less-than-
50% owned affiliate
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,316
    
    
    
    1,943
    
    
    
    1,733
    
    
    
    2,311Fixed Charges
    
    $
    51,566
    
    
    $
    53,101
    
    
    $
    48,854
    
    
    $
    31,265
    
    
    $
    30,101Ratio of Earnings to
Fixed Charges
    
    
    2.49
    
    
    
    2.50
    
    
    
    2.97
    
    
    
    3.30
    
    
    
    5.11
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 25 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

MARK SWANGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs.

FRANK BEEBE; ARTHUR

WHITLOCK; STEVEN AMES; RUBY

BRIDGEFORTH; CHARLIE KEEN;

BARBARA CHILES; CLAUDE

PIERRE LOUISE; JOE MARTINES;

TONY KIDD; JOHN MORSE; LINDA

HERNANDEZ; KENT PHILLIPS;

SHIRLEY SEARUGGS; LA RAE

KEMP, M.D.; ETHEL OATMAN,

R.N.; MEL STENCEL; MARSHA

BOYLE; CHAR EHRENSHIFT; DEL

BROWN; DAVID BACHMAN, M.D.;

HILDA STANLEY; UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL;

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR

THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO;

U.S.P.O., SPECIFIC AGENCY;

JEFFREY METZNER, M.D. Ph.;

WALTER TORRES, Ph.d.,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 98-1242

(D.C. No. 98-605)

(D. Colo..)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

- 2 -

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Swanger attempts to appeal from the dismissal of his complaint with

prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The district court 

denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

We review a Rule 8(a) dismissal for an abuse of discretion, ordinarily after

time is given to amend a complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). See

Mangan v. Weinberger, 848 F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir. 1988). With his notice of

appeal, Mr. Swanger apparently attempted to amend the complaint. See R. doc.

49. We have reviewed the district court pleadings as well as Mr. Swanger’s

submissions on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion. See Carpenter v. Williams, 86 F.3d 1015, 1016 (10th Cir. 1996). Fed.

R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) requires short and plain statements of claims showing that a

plaintiff is entitled to relief. The complaint (and attempted amendment) consists

of recounting numerous incidents without sufficient identification of actors and

applicable legal theories. See Monument Builders of Greater Kansas City, Inc. v.

American Cemetery Ass’n of Kansas, 891 F.2d 1473, 1480 (10th Cir. 1989)
- 3 -

(discussing purpose of complaint).

The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and the appeal is DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
     The financial data schedule contains summary financial information
     restated as a result of FASB 128 for Howell Corporation for year-to-date
     March 31, 1997, June 30, 1997, and  September 30, 1997, and is qualified
     in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000
       
<S>                           <C>          <C>         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos        6-mos       9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997  Dec-31-1997 Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1997  Jun-30-1997 Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                        20           19          52
<SECURITIES>                  0            0           0
<RECEIVABLES>                 9107         3523        4018
<ALLOWANCES>                  266          144         141
<INVENTORY>                   2295         51          50
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              12270        3902        4674
<PP&E>                        408961       306559      306073
<DEPRECIATION>                215072       202816      204871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                153134       150272      129213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         17355        16610       10955
<BONDS>                       20081        17581       3500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0            0           0
<PREFERRED>                   690          690         690
<COMMON>                      4996         5081        5112
<OTHER-SE>                    85695        86136       86654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  153134       150272      129213
<SALES>                       17645        16971       24493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              17645        16971       24493
<CGS>                         13398        11543       17359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 13398        11543       17359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0            28          (128)
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0            0           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            465          854         1064
<INCOME-PRETAX>               2153         2495        3353
<INCOME-TAX>                  751          912         1062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0            1583        2291
<DISCONTINUED>                0            458         757
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0            0           0
<CHANGES>                     0            0           0
<NET-INCOME>                  1402         2041        3048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .16          .17         .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .16          .16         .24
        

</TABLE>