alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00465-CV

Laura Ann King and All Other Occupants

v.

Oso Bay Apartments

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2019-CCV-61422-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellants, Laura Ann King and All Other Occupants. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 26, 2019
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

PROLITEC, INC

., Appellant

v.

SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIE S, INC

., Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1017

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013

- 00180.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

E RIKA A RNER , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Ga rrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. D EREK M C C ORQUINDALE ; C ORY C.
B ELL , Boston, MA.

J OSHUA B. P OND , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also repr esented by A DAM H OWARD C HARNES , Winston

- Salem, NC;
D AVID C LAY H OLLOWAY

, T IFFANY L. W ILLIAMS , Atlanta,
GA.______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, D YK and W ALLACH

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          32,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,580,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                   455,004
<INVENTORY>                                 22,271,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,058,724
<PP&E>                                       5,083,424
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,637,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,194,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,076,833
<BONDS>                                     16,708,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,412
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,343,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,194,783
<SALES>                                     46,050,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,050,132
<CGS>                                       29,212,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,367,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (29,063)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               336,819
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,008,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (510,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (166,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (343,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (343,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.10)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered July 1 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00089-CV

DELINDA BREWSTER, Appellant

V.

AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT PROPERTIES TWO, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-00021-D

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated March 23, 2016, we 

notified the official court reporter for County Court at Law No. 4 that the reporter’s record was 

overdue. We directed the court reporter to file the record within thirty days. To date, we have 

not received any response. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Court Reporter Coral Hough to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS

of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record or written verification no hearings were 

recorded. We notify appellant that if we receive verification she has not requested the record, 

we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Coral 
Hough, Official Court Reporter, County Court at Law No. 4.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 for May Limited  Partnership  1983-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000743453
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1983-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         187
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384
<PP&E>                                         16,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   954
<SALES>                                        418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               423
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                262
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            262
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  11.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  11.61
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed  Consolidated  Balance  Sheet at  September  30,  1998 and the related
Condensed  Statement  of  Consolidated  Operations  for  the nine  months  ended
September  30,  1998 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        151,311
<SECURITIES>                                  157,952
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    78,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              441,441
<PP&E>                                      2,193,753
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,430,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,315,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         157,188
<BONDS>                                       354,451
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      211,204
<OTHER-SE>                                    195,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,315,928
<SALES>                                       609,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              594,931
<CGS>                                         513,324<F1> 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 549,489<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              261,447<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (231,818)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,998)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (219,743)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (219,743) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.04)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.04) 

<FN>
<F1> Includes Production costs and Depreciation, depletion and amortization from
Condensed Statement of Consolidated Operations.
<F2> Includes Production costs and Depreciation,  depletion and amortization and
Administrative  and general  expense from  Condensed  Statement of  Consolidated
Operations.
<F3>  Includes  Exploration  expense,  Write-downs  and other  unusual  charges,
Business  combination  and  integration  cost and Other  expense from  Condensed
Statement of Consolidated Operations.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11719]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7009]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Holocaust (Warsaw Ghetto)''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the documents to 
be included in the exhibition ``The Holocaust (Warsaw Ghetto),'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The documents are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the documents at the U.S. Holocaust 
Memorial Museum, Washington, DC, from on or about June 2010 until on or 
about June 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 5, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-11719 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-8987-2]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-1399 or                     *http://www.epa.gov/​compliance/​nepa/​*.                

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements filed 12/28/2009 through 01/01/2010 pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    In accordance with Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to make its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies public. Historically, EPA has met this mandate by publishing weekly notices of availability of EPA comments, which includes a brief summary of EPA's comment letters, in the                     **Federal Register.**                     Since February 2008, EPA has been including its comment letters on EISs on its Web site at:                     *http://www.epa.gov/​compliance/​nepa/​eisdata.html.*                     Including the entire EIS comment letters on the Web site satisfies the Section 309(a) requirement to make EPA's comments on EISs available to the public. Accordingly, after March 31, 2010, EPA will discontinue the publication of this notice of availability of EPA comments in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*EIS No. 20090451, Draft EIS, FHWA, FL,*                     St. Johns River Crossing Project, Improved Highway Corridor and Bridge Crossing the St. Johns River between Clay and St. Johns Counties, FL, Comment Period Ends: 02/22/2010, Contact: Cathy Kendall 850-942-9650.                

*EIS No. 20090452, Draft EIS, FHWA, MO,*                     Rex Whitton Expressway Project, To Safely and Reliably Improve Personal and Freight Mobility, Reduce Traffic Congestion, U.S. 50/63 (Rex Whitton Expressway, also Known as Whitton) Facility in Cole County, MO, Comment Period Ends: 02/22/2010, Contact: Peggy Casey 573-636-7104.                

Dated: January 5, 2010.

Robert W. Hargrove,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2010-120 Filed 1-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**EXHIBIT
      10.16**





**Summary
      of Non-Management Director Compensation****for 2007**





The
      following compensation arrangement was adopted by the Board of Directors upon
      the recommendations of the Compensation Committee in May 2007:





**Annual
      Cash Compensation**





·
            Each
                non-management director shall receive an annual retainer fee in the
                amount
                of $20,000;




·
            The
                Lead Director shall receive an additional annual retainer fee in
                the
                amount of $15,000;




·
            The
                Chairman of the Audit Committee shall receive an additional annual
                retainer fee in the amount of $10,000;
                and




·
            The
                Chairman of each of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the
                Compensation Committee and the HMO Subcommittee shall receive an
                additional annual retainer fee in the amount of
                $7,500.




**Annual
      Equity Compensation**





Each
      non-management director shall receive an annual grant of equity awards with
      an
      aggregate value of $37,500, which amount shall be payable 80% in restricted
      shares of the Corporation’s common stock and 20% in options to purchase the
      Corporation’s common stock. The restricted shares and options will be issued
      pursuant to the Corporation’s Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan and shall vest
      one year from their respective date of issuance. The stock options will have
      an
      exercise price equal to the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock on
      the American Stock Exchange on the date preceding the grant date.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OLEGARIO SOLTERO-SANCHEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71236

Agency No. A026-720-111

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 4, 2011** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: SCHROEDER, McKEOWN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Olegario Soltero-Sanchez, native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reconsider,

after the BIA vacated an Immigration Judge’s grant of Soltero-Sanchez’s request

for a § 212(c) waiver as a matter of discretion. The BIA found that to the extent it

FILED

JUN 02 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

could construe the motion for reconsideration as a motion to reopen, there was no

explanation why Soltero-Sanchez’s newly submitted psychological consultation

report regarding rehabilitation could not have been discovered or presented at his

removal hearing. 

We have jurisdiction to review “whether the BIA applied the correct legal

standard in making its [discretionary] determination” even though we lack

jurisdiction to review the BIA’s underlying decision regarding whether SolteroSanchez should be granted § 212(c) relief. Anaya-Ortiz v. Holder, 594 F.3d 673,

676 (9th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). We will reverse the BIA’s

denial of a motion for reconsideration or to reopen “only if the BIA acted

arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law.” Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d

785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). 

The BIA did not err in denying Soltero-Sanchez’s motion to reconsider

because his motion did not specify errors of fact or law in the BIA’s decision. 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (“A motion to reconsider shall state the reasons for the

motion by specifying the errors of fact or law in the prior Board decision and shall

be supported by pertinent authority.”). The BIA also did not abuse its discretion in

denying Soltero-Sanchez’s motion to reopen that was based on the newly presented

psychological report. Soltero-Sanchez failed to show that the report was not
3

previously available. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (“A motion to reopen

proceedings shall not be granted unless it appears to the Board that evidence

sought to be offered is material and was not available and could not have been

discovered or presented at the former hearing.”).

PETITION DENIED.
Exhibit
      23.1





**INDEPENDENT
      REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
      Netsmart Technologies, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-111389, 333-101474,
      333-96015 and 333-71549) and S-3 (File Nos. 333-129265 and 333-104565) of our
      report dated February 10, 2006 on our audits of the consolidated financial
      statements of Netsmart Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
      2005 and 2004, and for each of the three years in the period ended December
      31,
      2005, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Netsmart
      Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.








/s/
      Marcum & Kliegman LLP





Marcum
      & Kliegman LLP


Melville,
      NY


March
      30,
      2006
Order entered May 28, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00218-CR

GAYLAND LAMONT EDWARDS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-55217-Y

ORDER

In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The 

record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs 

assessed in this case.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization 

of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court 

appointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a 

document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roaming Messenger, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the "Report")
I, Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer
of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

               (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects,  the financial  condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.


\s\ Jonathan Lei
-----------------------------------------------
Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### William W. Penfield, as Executor, etc., of Louisa Ann Penfield, Deceased, Appellant, v. Susan A. Penfield, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
#### Moritz Weinberger v. Grand Lodge, etc. Henry F. Hurff v. E. R. Brackett Company.

Applications denied, with ten dollars costs. Orders signed.