alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                       Exhibit 11


                                                                CityFed Financial Corp.
                                                 Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss



                                                  Three Months Ended                   Nine months ended
                                                     September 30,                       September 30,
                                                 1996              1995             1996              1995

<S>                                             <C>              <C>               <C>               <C>       
Computation of Loss Per Share:

Weighted average number of shares
       outstanding                              18,714,646      18,714,646        18,714,646        18,714,646


Loss applicable to  common stock:1


       From continuing operations
                                               $(2,088,000)    $(2,129,000)      $ (6,307,000)     $(6,229,000)
                                               ===========     ===========       ============      =========== 

       From discontinued operations
                                               $  (200,000)    $  (500,000)      $ (4,350,000)     $(1,200,000)
                                               ===========     ===========       ============      =========== 

       Net Loss                                $(2,288,000)    $(2,629,000)      $(10,657,000)     $(7,429,000)
                                               ===========     ===========       ============      ===========  


Loss per share:


       From continuing operations
                                                   $(0.11)          $(0.11)           $(0.34)           $(0.33)
                                                   =======          =======           =======           =======

       From discontinued operations
                                                   $(0.01)          $(0.03)           $(0.23)           $(0.07)
                                                   =======          =======           =======           =======

       Net Loss                                    $(0.12)          $(0.14)           $(0.57)           $(0.40)
                                                   =======          =======           =======           =======

</TABLE>


--------
1 Losses applicable to Common Stock are net of preferred stock dividends for the
three months ended  September  30, 1996 and 1995 in the amount of  $2,159,000 in
each  period.  Losses  applicable  to Common  Stock are net of  preferred  stock
dividends for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and 1995 in the amount of
$6,477,000 in each period.
**Exhibit10.56**

 

2006 NamedExecutive Officer Base Compensation

and Short-TermIncentive Targets

 

*2006 Base Salary and Short-TermIncentive Targets*. The Compensation Committee approved basesalaries and short-term incentive targets for certain executive officers for2006 as follows: Vance N. Booker, Senior Vice President, Administration -$350,000 and 55% respectively, and James R. Harris, Senior Vice President andPhilippines Region Head - $275,000 and 50%, respectively. The base salaries andshort-term incentive targets of Mirant’s other executive officers are set forthin their employment agreements and no changes have been made at this time.

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Form
S-8 (No. 333-8162), Form S-8 (No. 333-71532), Form S-8 (No. 333-55480), and Form
S-8 (No. 333-62907) of TLC Vision Corporation of our report dated March 25,
2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TLC Vision
Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the seven-month
period ended December 31, 2002.


St. Louis, Missouri                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 31, 2003
#### John N. Montgomery and Rufus M. Meroney, executors, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*J. W. AND S. W. Pruitt *et*al., defendants in error.

It is not necessary that the declaration shall affirmatively show a case to be within the exceptions mentioned in the 14th section of the Act of October 13th, 1870, to excuse the filing of the affidavit required by the 2d section of the Act. It is sufficient, if the facts be made to appear to the Court by proof.

Relief Act of 1870. Exceptions. Before Judge Davis. Clarke Superior Court. August Term, 1871.

John N. Montgomery and Rufus M. Meroney, as executors of Robert W. Pruitt, deceased, brought complaint against J. W. and S. W. Pruitt, principals, and T. A. Neal and W. B. Burns, securities, on a note made prior to June 1st, 1865, for #6,000.

When the case was called, defendants moved to dismiss it, because no affidavit had been filed as to the payment of taxes, under the Relief Act of 1870.

Counsel for plaintiffs stated that the note sued on belonged to a minor, who was the sole legatee, under the will of Rob*111ert W. Pruitt, deceased, and offered to prove these facts to the Court.

The Court dismissed the suit, holding that, as the declaration failed to aver facts, bringing the case within the L4th section of the Relief Act of 1870, an affidavit as to the payment of taxes was necessary, to which decision plaintiffs in error excepted.

Cobb, Erwin & Cobb, represented by The Reporter, for plaintiffs in error.

G. McMillan, for defendants.

McCay, Judge.

This suit was pending in the name of the executors of Robert Pruitt. It is no alteration of the allegations to show that the persons entitled to the estate are minors. The cause of action remains the same — no new parties are introduced. The executor sues, avowedly, as the trustee of those entitled, whoever they may be. Nor is there anything in the Act of October 13th, 1870, to require what is there provided, in reference to the payment of taxes, to appear in the pleadings. Indeed, the very opposite would seem to follow, from the provisions of section 2d, that the defendant may make the investigation provided for without a plea. The rights of the parties are not involved. It is the public whose interest is intended by the statute to be protected, and there would seem to be no necessity to make a record of the proceeding for the protection of either.

We think the Court was wrong to require the amendment. It is sufficient to excuse the filing the affidavit, if the plaintiffs show, by proof, that the case is within the exceptions.

Judgment reversed.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of L.R ., a child, * From the 3 26th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 10487

- CX

.

No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 332

- C V * May 25 , 20 2 3

* Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that th ere is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the

order of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed.
*

Honorable William M. Hoeveler, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting

by designation. 

 **Chief Judge R. Lanier Anderson, III, did not participate in this decision. This decision is rendered by

a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). 

Rosario DONATO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-2428.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

March 7, 2000.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 96-865-CIV-ORL-19);

Patricia C. Fawsett, Judge.

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, BLACK, Circuit Judge, and HOEVELER*

, Senior District Judge.**

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the district court's dismissal of Appellant's complaint on the basis of the opinion rendered

by the Supreme Court of Florida, Donato v. AT & T Co., No. SC93534, --- So.2d ---- (Fla. Jan.20, 2000).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief executive officer of MacroChem Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
     September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
     (the "FORM 10-Q/A") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

                                    /S/  ROBERT J. DELUCCIA
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Robert J. DeLuccia
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:    April 11, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MacroChem Corporation and will be retained by MacroChem Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.






                                       35
ex10-2.htm



    
      

      

    

     

    Trilliant Exploration Corporation 10-Q

     

     

    Exhibit 10.2

     

     

     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        1

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    



     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        2

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    



     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        3

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    



     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        4

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    



     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        5

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    



     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        6

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    



     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        7

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    



     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        8

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    



     

     


    9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,008
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,037,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,327
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,167,725)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,383
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,132
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  304,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,076)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# U.S. Senators Awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom

**

----

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.
Exhibit 4.2.4


 


ADDITIONAL AGREEMENT No. 5 TO CONTRACT #P81044
DATED MARCH 1, 2008


 


	
  Moscow

  	
  17th of December 2008  

  



 


CJSC “Tetra
Pak”, Moscow, hereinafter referred to as the “Seller”, represented by the
Commercial Operations Director Winfried Muehling, acting on the basis of Power
of attorney 10-12/125 dated 01/01/2008, on the one part, and


 


ОАО  “Wimm-Bill-Dann”, Moscow, Russia,
hereinafter referred to as the “Buyer”, represented by Purchasing Director
Skorobogatov A.V., acting on the basis of Power of Attorney #331dated
17.01.2008, on the other part, have concluded the present contract on the
following:


 


have concluded this Additional
Agreement (the “Agreement”) to the Contract No.P81044 dated March 1st, as follows:


 


1. Article 15.1 of the
Contract No.P81044 dated 1st March, 2008 (hereinafter — the “Contract”)
shall be altered and stated in the following way:


 


“The Contract is valid till December 31,
2009. Termination of the Contract should not release the parties from the
performance of its obligations acting on the date of the contract termination”


 


2. Consider Annex 1.3
(Specification) invalid from 01.01.2009.


 


3. To sign Annex 1.4
(Specification) that comes into force on 01.01.2009 and valid till 30.04.2009
and consider them to be integral part to the contract No. P81044.


 


4. To prolong validity of
article 1.3 of Annex No. 2 till 31.12.2009.


 


5. All the terms and
conditions of the Contract, beyond this Agreement will remain unchanged.


 


6. The Agreement comes in to
effect upon signing.


 


7. After signing of the
Agreement all preliminary agreements, discussions and correspondence between
the parties concerning this contract are to be considered invalid from the date
of signing.


 


8. This Agreement is drawn up
in two copies, both being equally valid and constitutes an integral part of the
Contract.


 


	
  THE SELLER

  	
   

  	
  THE BUYER
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF H

. N

. H ., A

CHILD

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 233

- C V

Appeal from the

388 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2010CM1478 )

O R D E R

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely. The trial court signed the termination order on October

2, 2017. Consequently, Appellant’s notice of accelerated appeal was due to be filed on Monday,

October 23, 2017. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 4.1(a), 26.1(b), 28.1(b). Appellant did not file her notice of

appeal u ntil November 2, 2017 . Thus, her notice of appeal is untimely but it was filed within

fifteen days of the deadline. Under the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Verburgt v. Dorner

, a

motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is implied, bu t Appellant is still required

to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617

(Tex. 1997). We conclude that Appellant should be provided with an opportunity to remedy this

defect in the implied motion for extension of time.

The Court hereby gives notice of its intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction2

unless any party establishes grounds for the appeal to continue within ten days from the date of

this order . Appellant is specifically directed to file with the Cour t a reasonable explanation for her

failure to timely file the not ice of appeal. If Appellant fail s to provide a reason able explanation

within ten days from the date of this order, the Court will dismiss the appeal for want o f jurisdiction

without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 7 th day of February , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
#### In the Matter of Spuyten Duyvil Road.

Motion granted. Order to be settled on notice.
## In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_____________________ _____ 09
- 13
- 00153
- CV

__________________________

_________________________________________________________________ On Appea l from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 12
- 09
- 09657 CV

_________________________________________________________________ O RDER The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed April 23, 2013 , and the reporter’s record was filed May 2, 2013 . On July 12,
2013 , the appellant’s retained attorney, Scott Pa w gan, was notified that neither the brief of the appellant nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief ha d been filed. Although the brief of the appellant was due to be filed June 3, 2013, the brief has not been filed. We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing at which a representative of the State and counsel for the appellant, and In Re Commitment of Vernon Lee Asbellthe appellant shall appear in person or by telephone

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8( a )( 2 ). W e direct the trial court to determine whether or not appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has not been filed, why appellant’s counsel has not responded to late notices from this Court, and whether good cause exists for retained counsel, Scott Pa w gan , to be relieved of his duties as appellate counsel and replaced by substitute couns el

. See Health and Safety Code Ann. Sec. 841.005 (West 2008). If the trial court determines that good cause exists to relieve counsel of his duties and the appellant is indigent , we direct the trial court to appoint substitute counsel. The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of the court reporter’s notes from the hearing and the recommendations of the trial court judge are to be filed on or b efore September 30, 2013

. ORDER ENTERED August 29, 2013

. PER CURIAM Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4729 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4729

 To require debarment of persons convicted of fraudulent use of ``Made 
                          in America'' labels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2014

Mr. Grayson (for himself and Ms. Shea-Porter) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require debarment of persons convicted of fraudulent use of ``Made 
                          in America'' labels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prohibiting False `Made in America' 
Claims Act''.

SEC. 2. DEBARMENT REQUIRED OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF FRAUDULENT USE OF 
              ``MADE IN AMERICA'' LABELS.

    (a) Debarment Required.--Subsection (a) of section 2410f of title 
10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``the Secretary shall'' 
and all that follows through the period and inserting ``the person 
shall be debarred from contracting with the Department of Defense 
unless the Secretary waives the debarment under subsection (b).''.
    (b) Waiver Authority and Notification Requirement.--Section 2410f 
of such title is further amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (d); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsections:
    ``(b) Waiver for National Security.--The Secretary may waive a 
debarment required by subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that 
the exercise of such a waiver would be in the national security 
interests of the United States.
    ``(c) Notification.--The Secretary shall notify the congressional 
defense committees annually, not later than March 1 of each year, of 
any exercise of the waiver authority under subsection (b).''.
    (c) Technical Amendments.--Section 2410f of such title is further 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``Debarment Required.--
        '' after ``(a)''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), as redesignated by subsection (b), 
        by inserting ``Definition.--'' before ``In this section''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund IV (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                   |  |  |  |                                   
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel Stephenson             
|                   |  |  |  | Daniel Stephenson, General Partner
|                   |  |  |  | Rancon Realty Fund IV