alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule For FCCC
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000744126
<NAME>                        First Chester County Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         25,409
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         126
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    100,581
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         1,969
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2,072
<LOANS>                                        392,070
<ALLOWANCE>                                    6,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 533,469
<DEPOSITS>                                     449,801
<SHORT-TERM>                                   31,276
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            11,432
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,800
<OTHER-SE>                                     36,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 533,469
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                23,952
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              5,395
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               41
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               29,388
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             11,232
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,452
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          16,936
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  822
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (40)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                14,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,165
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     6,165
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,464
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.69
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,784
<LOANS-PAST>                                   346
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               6,261
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  417
<RECOVERIES>                                   100
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              6,766
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           6,766
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
     The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
annual  report on Form  10-KSB or the fiscal  year  ended  June 30,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,298
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,035
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      8,766
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        102,803
<ALLOWANCE>                                        529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,882
<DEPOSITS>                                      84,310
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                410
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               18
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 116,882
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,697
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  291
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   117
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,105
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,883
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,353
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,752
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      104
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    864
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         510
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       510
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.57
<LOANS-NON>                                        315
<LOANS-PAST>                                       440
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   426
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       23
<RECOVERIES>                                        22
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  529
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               529
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                           TLC VISION SUBSIDIARY LIST
                                   MARCH 2004

LISTING OF THE COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES                                 Exhibit 21

20/20 Laser Centers, Inc.
American Eye Instruments
Aspen Healthcare Inc.
California Refractive LLC
Hartford Refractive LLC
Laser Access of Indiana LLC
Laser Eye Care of California, LLC
Laser Vision Center of Edina LLC
Laser Vision Centers, Inc.
Laservision (Europe) Limited
LaserVision Centres Limited
Laser Vision Limited
Laservision Harley Street Limited
Long Island Refractive LLC
LVCI Holdings, Inc.
Midwest Surgical Services, Inc.
New Mexico Refractive LLC
New Vision Strategies LLLC
Northwestern Laser Vision LLC
Occulogix Holdings, Inc.
Occulogix LP
Occulogix Management Inc.
Ogden Refractive LLC
Ontario Laser Center LLC
OR Partners, Inc.
OR Providers, Inc.
Oxford Eye Surgery Center, LP
Phoenix Eye Surgical Center
Providence Refractive LLC
Refractive Laser Partnership No. 1
RHEO Clinic
San Jose Refractive LLC
Southeast Medical, Inc.
Southern Ophthalmics, Inc.
TLC Apheresis (USA) Inc.
TLC Apheresis Inc.
TLC Apheresis LP
TLC Ardmore LLC
TLC Capital Corporation
TLC Continuing Education Foundation
TLC Florida Eye Laser Center LLC
TLC Laser Eye Care of La Jolla LLC
TLC Laser Eye Care of Torrance LLC
TLC Laser Eye Centers (ATAC) LLC
TLC Laser Eye Center (Hungary) Ltd. (1)
TLC Laser Eye Centers (Piedmont/Atlanta) LLC
TLC Laser Eye Centers (Refractive I) Inc.
TLC Managed Care Inc.
TLC Management Services Inc.
TLC Michigan L.L.C.
TLC Midwest Eye Laser Center, Inc.
TLC Network Services Inc.
TLC Oklahoma Doctors L.L.C.
TLC The Laser Center (Annapolis) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Baltimore Management) LLC


                                                                               1
<PAGE>

                           TLC VISION SUBSIDIARY LIST
                                   MARCH 2004

TLC The Laser Center (Baltimore) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Boca Raton) Limited Partnership
TLC The Laser Center (Carolina) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Connecticut) L.L.C.
TLC The Laser Center (Detroit) L.L.C.
TLC The Laser Center (Indiana) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Indiana) LLC
TLC The Laser Center (Institute) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Kalamazoo) L.L.C.
TLC The Laser Center (Lansing) L.L.C.
TLC The Laser Center (London) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Moncton) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Northeast) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Northwest) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Patents) Inc.
TLC The Laser Center (Pittsburgh) L.L.C.
TLC The Laser Center (Tri-Cities) Inc.
TLC USA, LLC
TLC Vision (USA) Corporation
TLC Vision Source, Inc.
TLC Whitten Laser Eye Associates LLC
Valley Laser Eye Center LLC
Vascular Sciences Corporation
Vision Corporation
Vision Source LP
Vision Source Management LLC
Wisconsin Refractive LLC

(1)   TLC Laser Eye Centers (Hungary) Ltd. is a special purpose subsidiary used
      by the Company for financial planning purposes.


                                                                               2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8



                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                  This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made effective
as of December 31, 1997, by and among Chester National Bank, a national bank,
Chester Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Edward K.
Collins.

                  WHEREAS, the parties hereto previously entered into and
executed that certain Employment Agreement dated October 4, 1996 (the
"Employment Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
herein have the meanings given to such terms in the Employment Agreement;

                  WHEREAS, the parties to the Employment Agreement desire to
amend the Agreement to extend the term thereof for an additional year, as
contemplated by Section 2 of the Employment Agreement;

                  WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Bank has conducted a
formal performance evaluation of the Executive for purposes of determining
whether to extend the Employment Agreement, and has determined that such
Employment Agreement should be extended for an additional year.

                  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
contained herein and in the Employment Agreement, and upon the other terms and
conditions hereinafter provided, the parties hereto agree that the term of the
Employment Agreement is hereby extended until January 1, 2001, and all other
terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
First Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the 31st day of December, 1997.


CHESTER NATIONAL BANK                                CHESTER BANCORP, INC.


By: /s/ Michael W. Welge                             By: /s/ Michael W. Welge
   ------------------------                             -----------------------
Name: Michael W. Welge                               Name: Michael W. Welge
     ----------------------                                --------------------
Title: President                                     Title: President
      ---------------------                                ---------------


EXECUTIVE

/s/ Edward K. Collins
--------------------------
    Edward K. Collins
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2407

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to the record

of admission for permanent residence in the case of certain aliens.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 12, 2000

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect

to the record of admission for permanent residence in

the case of certain aliens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Date of Registry Act

5 of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. RECORD OF ADMISSION FOR PERMANENT RESI7 DENCE IN THE CASE OF CERTAIN ALIENS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 249 of the Immigration

9 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1259) is amended—
2

•S 2407 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘January 1,

2 1972’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 1986’’; and

3 (2) by striking ‘‘JANUARY 1, 1972’’ in the head4 ing and inserting ‘‘JANUARY 1, 1986’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

6 (1) GENERAL RULE.—The amendments made

7 by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of en8 actment of this Act.

9 (2) EXTENSION OF DATE OF REGISTRY.—

10 (A) PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1,

11 2002.—Beginning on January 1, 2002, section

12 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8

13 U.S.C. 1259) is amended by striking ‘‘January

14 1, 1986’’ each place it appears and inserting

15 ‘‘January 1, 1987’’.

16 (B) PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1,

17 2003.—Beginning on January 1, 2003, section

18 249 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Janu19 ary 1, 1987’’ each place it appears and insert20 ing ‘‘January 1, 1988’’.

21 (C) PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1,

22 2004.—Beginning on January 1, 2004, section

23 249 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Janu24 ary 1, 1988’’ each place it appears and insert25 ing ‘‘January 1, 1989’’.
3

•S 2407 IS

1 (D) PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1,

2 2005.—Beginning on January 1, 2005, section

3 249 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Janu4 ary 1, 1989’’ each place it appears and insert5 ing ‘‘January 1, 1990’’.

6 (E) PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1,

7 2006.—Beginning on January 1, 2006, section

8 249 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Janu9 ary 1, 1990’’ each place it appears and insert10 ing ‘‘January 1, 1991’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Proceedings for the Drainage of Certain Lowlands Known as The Spring Valley Swamp, Situated in the Village of Spring Valley, in the Town of Ramapo, County of Rockland and State of New York. Luise C. Knauth, Appellant; Julia A. Reed and Others, Respondents.

Second Department,

June 9, 1911.

Appeal — drainage commissioners — power of Appellate Division.

The Appellate Division has no jurisdiction to pass upon the question as to whether the decision of commissioners appointed under the provisions of the Drainage Law and the order of the County Court affirming’ the same are contrary to the weight of evidence.

Appeal by Luise 0. Knauth from an order of the County Court of Rockland county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 29th day of March, 1910, affirming'the determination of commissioners. .

*Hamilton B. Squier,*for the appellant.

*George A.*Blcmvelt, for the respondents.

Burr, J.:

In January, 1909, application was made by petition to. the-County Court of Rockland county for the appointment of three commissioners in accordance with the provisions of the statute relative' to proceedings for the drainage of swamps, marshes and other low or wet lands, and for draining farm lands (Laws of 1869, chap. 888, and the acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto). Commissioners were appointed, who reported that it was necessary to drain the lands described in the. petition, that the outlet of the pond described therein and located upon the lands of Luise C. Knauth should be deepened and cleared out, and that the dam of said pond should be removed so as to' permit the free passage of water therefrom. Luise 0. Knauth appealed to - the County Court, of Rockland county from the determination of the commissioners which *637affirmed the same. From such order of affirmance she has appealed to this court.

Appellant’s principal contention is that the decision of the commissioners, and the order of the County Court confirming the same, are contrary to the weight of the evidence. We have no jurisdiction to pass upon this question. (Laws of 1869, chap. 888, § 12, as amd. by Laws of 1886, .chap.. -636, § 9; Drainage.Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 15; Laws of 1909, chap. 20], § 39; *Matter of Ryers,*72 N. Y. 1; *Matter of Swan,*97 id. 492.)

, None of the exceptions to rulings upon questions of evidence merit discussion.

The order appealed from should he affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

JenkS, P. J:, Hirscjhberg, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed,- with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2351

SUSAN WASHINGTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Thomas M. DiGirolamo , Magistrate Judge. ( 8:16

- cv - 02429

- TMD )

Submitted : April 30, 2018 Decided: May 8, 2018

Before WILKINSON , NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Susan Washington , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Susan Washington appeals the magistrate judge ’s order upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Washington’s application for disa bility
insurance benefits. ∗ “In social security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as does the district court. That is, a reviewing court must uphold the determination when an ALJ has applied correct legal standards and t he ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” Brown v. Comm’ r Soc. Sec. Admin. , 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind might accept as a dequate to support a conclusion. It consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” Pearson v. Colvin , 810 F.3d 204, 207 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “In reviewing for substan tial evidence, we do not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ. Where conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is disabled, the res ponsibility for that decision falls on the ALJ.” Hancock v. Astrue , 667 F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2012) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted). We have reviewed the record and perceive no reversible error. The ALJ applied the correct l egal standards in evaluating Washington’s claim for benefits, and the ALJ’s

∗ The parties consented to a final disposition by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).3 factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we grant Washington leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and we affirm the magistrate judge’s order upholding t he denial of benefits. See Washington v. Colvin , No. 8:16

- cv - 02429

- TMD (D. Md. filed Sept. 25, 2017 & entered Sept. 26, 2017 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Appointed Senators (1913-Present)

**

----

The Seventeenth Amendment to the *Constitution* (1913) established direct election of    senators, as well as a means of filling vacant Senate seats. If a vacancy occurs due to a senator's death, resignation, or expulsion, the Seventeenth Amendment allows state    legislatures to empower the governor to appoint a replacement to complete the term or to hold office until a special election can take place. There are a few exceptions    to this rule. Some states require a special election to fill a vacancy. A few states require the governor to appoint a replacement of the same political party as the previous    incumbent. The date when a senator appointed to fill a vacancy is succeeded by a senator elected to fill the remainder of the term depends on a number of factors. 

    For more information on how vacancies are filled read, *U.S. Senate Vacancies: Contemporary Developments and Perspectives* (CRS) (PDF)     and the Senate Document    *The Term of Senator: When Does It Begin and End?* (PDF).

The names of current senators appear in bold print.

1. Wyman had run against John Durkin in the November 1974 general election for seat being vacated by Norris Cotton, but the election results were contested. In the meantime, Norris Cotton resigned his seat on Dec. 31, 1974, and the governor appointed Wyman to serve the last 3 days of Cotton's term. The seat was then vacant from Jan. 3, 1975, until Aug. 8, 1975, when Cotton was appointed to fill the vacancy pending the results of a special election to be held in September between Wyman and Durkin. Durkin handily won the special election.

2. Appointed December 31, 2008, but credentials were not in order until January 15, 2009.

3. Appointed January 23, 2009, and appointment took effect upon her resignation from the House of Representatives on January 26, 2009. Took the oath of office on January 27, 2009.

4. Appointed May 3, 2011, but did not resign his House seat until May 9, 2011.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
.OFFICE OF THE &n,ORNN GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

conorable C. Sirmons 

;ounty Auditor 

::caderson County 

bth~kms, Texas 

-Opinion ls!o. O-7474 

A 

Zci have iec 

Cord.ssionersf ..Court 0 

nttolnc?y .to act as lo 

P-ax23 to,?ay hi* a mo 

The dommSeiioners~ Court may employ bunsel and. coqxmsate 

hti. from the'gener&, m when the matters.involved sre thoee concerniq the coun%y as .a whole, .where.the.regu&arly constituted public 

officials could, not or. would not act, or where public interest ww SO 

LTeat as to warrant such extra-lo@. services. City Hational 3ank V* 

Presidio County, 26 S.Fi. 775; Galveston County V. Gre~shan, 220.S,.'-J. f 
jion. C. SLmons 7 Pas& 2' .., 

: 

560 ax-or rofusedg Opinions of the &ttorney Generalof Texas Ho. O4354 and x0. o-1372. 

Article 334s Vernoxits Annotated CivQ 8t~atute0, wae in-~ 

tended to isqose a duty upon the County and Eistriot attormys 50 

&ve advice t.0 the Comm~s~ton0rs~ Court when roquwt is mad8 there 

for 

Sn k 

but this ir! no% +I restrfction iqma th8,Comissfoners~ Court 

he enplomr.% of sttor+ys to r.dvise Rnd render serrices to 

the Court in important mmere,comln~ before it for itrr consideration. Gibscm v. Davis; 236 S.%'i', 202. 

.In tlia case of Grooms v. ktacosa County,, 32.S.W. WO, the 

~om5osionez3*~ Coxirt mu&t to .arqploy a12 at&me 

Sor on0 year. -The Cow of C~5vil.A~$ea&s held t 

as le&l advisor 

L t the Ctmiosioqsrst 

Court was not authorlsed to Etgfro sua& a co@irs.ct+ and could n5t pay 

an attorney for ?ervicea-.ne$%4je?? required aor perform&l. 

It ia &Ur &n~&&'opinioa~t&~'the &n~&&'opinioa~t&~'the Taw,does Taw,does kot 5ntend i

that the~Co~nu5szg5oners~ the~Co~nu5szg5oners~ Cout%~ha&l Cout%~ha&l employ~c~nsel.aa-a employ~c~nsel.aa-a salary bas5s 

t~adv5sc t~adv5sc end represent mpsent tt. 5in in wbaWmrmtt+?~rs wbaWmrmtt+?~rs u5ght arise. 

%