alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Jessica Cosme, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Carol R. Feinman, J.), rendered March 8, 2011, convicting her, upon a plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Carol R. Feinman, J.), rendered March 8, 2011, affirmed.</p><p>The misdemeanor complaint was jurisdictionally valid because it described facts of an evidentiary nature establishing reasonable cause to believe that defendant committed the offenses of petit larceny (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 155.25) and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 165.40). The instrument alleged that defendant was observed inside a specified "Food Bazaar" store, removing merchandise from a shelf, concealing the items in a bag she was carrying, and attempting to leave the store without paying for the items by walking past the cashier's area and heading for the exit. The instrument further alleges that a store employee recovered the merchandise from defendant. Contrary to defendant's present claim, these allegations were nonconclusory and facially sufficient to support the charged offenses (<a href="../2017/2017_03705.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Livingston</i>, 150 AD3d 448</a> [2017], <i>lv denied </i>29 NY3d 1093 [2017]; <i>see also People v Olivo</i>, 52 NY2d 309, 318-319 [1981]).</p><p>Defendant further argues, and the People concede, that her conviction must be vacated because the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived her <i>Boykin</i> rights (<i>see Boykin v Alabama</i>, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; <a href="../2013/2013_08288.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Tyrell</i>, 22 NY3d 359</a>, 365 [2013]). However, defendant now states that the only relief sought is dismissal of the accusatory instrument rather than vacatur of the plea, and she expressly requests that we affirm the conviction if we do not grant a dismissal. Since it cannot be said that no penological purpose would be served by reinstating the two class A misdemeanor charges, dismissal is not warranted and therefore we affirm on this basis (<a href="../2015/2015_08615.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375</a>, 385 n 1 [2015]; <a href="../2016/2016_03598.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Teron</i>, 139 AD3d 450</a> [2016]).</p><p>The decision and order of this Court dated September 20, 2019 (65 Misc 3d 127[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 51501[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2019]) is hereby recalled and vacated.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: March 11, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### G. H. Peters Company, Respondent, v. St. Joseph’s Roman Catholic Church Society of Perry, Wyoming County, New York, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon questions of law and fact. Held, that the tenth and eleventh .findings of facts made by the referee are against the weight of the evidence; that the tinning of the bell decks and the slating of the spires were included in the original contract.

All concurred,
Specimen Certificate for Ordinary Shares of the Registrant



 EXHIBIT 4.2 
 CHEMSPEC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 
 (the “Company”) 
  

			
	 Number
	  	Ordinary Shares
	 -[    ]-
	  	-[    ]-    

 Incorporated in the Cayman Islands under the Companies Law 
 (as amended or revised from time to time) 
 The
authorized share capital of the Company is HK$200,000,000 divided into 20,000,000,000 shares of a 
 nominal or par value of HK$0.01 each (the
“Ordinary Shares”) 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT [            ] of
[            ] is the registered holder of [            ] Ordinary Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum
and Articles of Association thereof. 
 Executed on behalf of the Company this [            ] day
of [            ] 20[        ]. 
  

	
	                                        
                                         
    [Seal]

	 Director/Secretary


 THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED, OR APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS. THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED FOR SALE, SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR ASSIGNED (I) IN THE ABSENCE OF (A) AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR THE SHARES UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED,
AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR (B) AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, IN A GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FORM, THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER SAID ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR (II) UNLESS SOLD PURSUANT TO RULE 144 UNDER SAID ACT.

 TRANSFER 
 I
                                        
(the Transferor) for the value received DO HEREBY transfer to 
                                        
  (the Transferee) the 
                                        
  shares standing in my name in 
 CHEMSPEC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 
 To hold the same unto the Transferee 
 Dated
                                        

 Signed by the Transferor 
 In the presence of: 
  

					
	 Witness
	 		 	Transferor
tft 

# ga.o/tfcLcuLc^&j%p&r~ &HfU£~ 

# CjqU&T Of- CLRfrn/AJAL 4P/>dTs?2.S jR^co^ds J\=P#*77n&Jr. X. /<&&£.///&AboiJk <U)c/iers d&c/'s/as/jztaI APfU-jcJ&Tb/Ji~i~oA cJ&/7*6f' /^/96^^s &<oALPas 

# A/JtS.uAiJT'.TZ> J/&.C.CA yf/?r d-n.7jzyJ/JeiT' -ALL Crt/eX Jfa&^s arer/kjJ J^ecus/asls T£jfc d^^-fJ^rl^.-r.QALi^J OaJ g-6-3u>].r#Ad cOA-S falA 

## y-+ter.m7&L ca<?roa~ rT^r72M&E' d&cJissaa/s •cJoulJ &t? Ai&.tlgr/ic/rcJAs A/arr^cJ cj#/>r- / 

# ^£o3i^LmoMBfof^^^^f{ i/7^^~j:s PrtCLLoSceJ. /rtoH.e'i/ &£d£~# /Jo. =SLL /

"RECETVELTTN 

### COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JUS-IUJOEL 

## ^beJAcosta,ClerkI UNITED STATES I- POSTAL SERVICE e Serial Number 

### 22flL27c151fl5 

### ?^CoafiCr6WPPc#l£\ ^u*~fi0.&a*/Z&0 

### POSTAL MOKET OJKDER i Year Month Day 2015-08-06

~< ) Post Office 761W1 U S Dollars and Cents 

# l l """"" """* 817'Si ]• ~%- AmountSeventeen Dollars and 00/100 mimmimmmmaHu »*- - i. • . Clerk 18 /•

^

_ . / /

, '. / : * ^> X ~ ~ "Z . > i a r " 

### !tS/fikstTTLeriFdX TX.74"/a¥ O 2008 United State* Postal Satvtcs AllR ghtt Raurved iIOOOOQflOQEi: ¥- SEE REVERSEWARNING • NEGOTIABLE ONLY INTHE U S ANDPOSSESSIONS

- - Him
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2329 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2329

To improve the administration of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
   Service of the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2000

Mrs. Lincoln (for herself and Mr. Hutchinson) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve the administration of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
   Service of the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture, acting through the Administrator of the 
        Service.
            (2) Service.--The term ``Service'' means the Animal and 
        Plant Health Inspection Service of the Department of 
        Agriculture.
    (b) Exemption.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
migratory bird management carried out by the Secretary shall be exempt 
from the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.) (including regulations).
    (c) Permits; Management.--An agent, officer, or employee of the 
Service that carries out any activity relating to migratory bird 
management may, under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et 
seq.)--
            (1) issue a depredation permit to a stakeholder or 
        cooperator of the Service; and
            (2) manage and take migratory birds.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered January 7, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01329
- CR No. 05
- 12
- 01336
- CR
LAKENDRICK DUMANDRE HAYDEN, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Da llas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F09
- 62407
- R , F11
- 61298
- R



### O RDER On November 6, 2013, this Court ordered appellant to file his brief by December 16, 2013. We further warned that if the brief was not filed by that date, we would order appellant’s appointed attorney J. Daniel Oliphant removed and would order that new counsel be appointed. To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER J. Daniel Oliphant removed as appellant’s appointed attorney
in these cases.
We ORDER the tria l court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in these appeals and to transmit the order appointing counsel to this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of
this order.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, t o the

Honorable Mark Stoltz, Presiding Judge, 265th Judicial District Court; J. Daniel Oliphant; and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.
We A BATE the appeal s to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal s shall be reinstated fif

teen days from the date of this order or when the order appointing new counsel is received.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
# Senate Art & History Publications

**

----

Art Books

Conferences & Committees

Research Guides

Room Histories

Senate Buildings

Senate History

Senators & Senate Officers

Special Collections

        -  Virtual Reference Desk 
        -  Statistics & Lists 
        -  Bibliographies 
        -  How To... 
        -  Glossary 
        -  Senate Organization 
        -  The Constitution 
        -  Procurement 
        -  Employment & Internships 
        -            -  Senate Employment Office 
          -  Sergeant at Arms 
          -  Secretary of the Senate 
        -  Visiting
No. 1,920.

#### RUMNEY et al., Respondents, *v.*DONOVAN, Appellant.

*Appeal from District Court, Leivis and Clarice County; J. M. Clements, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided June 19, 1903.

*Mr. F. W. Mettler,*for Appellant.

*Messrs. Glayberg & Gunn,*and *Mr. A. J. Galen,*for Respondents. ,

Per Curiam.

Upon motion of counsel for the appellant this appeal is hereby dismissed as settled.
- Home
      - Grants          - Project Grants
        - Technical Assistance Grants
        - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
        - Strategic Initiatives Grants
        - Education Support Program
        - Funding Toolkit 
      - News
      - Grantee Spotlights
      - Priority Investment Areas          - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
      - Grant Management
      - About SJI          - Board of Directors
        - Executive Director
        - Past Members
        - SJI Budget 

                  - Home
                  - Grants                      - Project Grants
                    - Technical Assistance Grants
                    - Curriculum Adaptation & Training Grant
                    - Strategic Initiatives Grants
                    - Education Support Program
                    - Funding Toolkit 
                  - News
                  - Grantee Spotlights
                  - Priority Investment Areas                      - Court Pandemic Response and Recovery Grant Program 
                  - Grant Management
                  - About SJI                      - Board of Directors
                    - Executive Director
                    - Past Members
                    - SJI Budget 

### Supporting the Nation's Judicial System & the Public it Serves

## Executive Director

Jonathan D. Mattiello was appointed as the Executive Director in 2010, after serving three years as Deputy Director.  Prior to joining SJI, he served at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) as a Budget Analyst working on federal law enforcement resource management issues.  Earlier in his career, he served as a Program Analyst at the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and was detailed to the U.S. House Committee on Appropriations/Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee.

Mr. Mattiello is the recipient of numerous awards for service to SJI, DOJ, and DEA, including a Special Act Award for coordination and management of DOJ’s response to budgetary issues related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.  He is an Ex Officio member of the Conference of Chief Justices/Conference of State Court Administrators (CCJ/COSCA) National Task Force on Fines, Fees, and Bail Practices and the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) Research Advisory Council.  Mr. Mattiello began his federal career as a Presidential Management Intern in 2001, and served six years in the U.S. Army National Guard.  He holds a Masters in Public Affairs and B.A. in Communications from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro; a Certificate in Legislative Studies from Georgetown University; and Certified Court Manager and Certified Court Executive credentials from the Institute for Court Management.

### 

                    - Mattiello_Picture 1  (5 MB)

#### CONTACT US

          contact@sji.gov
                       Tel: 703.660.4979

#### HEADQUARTERS

                       State Justice Institute
                       12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340
                       Fairfax, VA 22033         

Website design by Segue Technologies, Inc.

            -  ** 
            -  **  **
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Certification of the Chairman of the Board of Management   Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,
fairly present in
all material
respects the
financial
conditions, results
of operations and
cash flows of the
company as of, and
for, the periods
presented in this
report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By: /s/ Wolfgang DondorfWolfgang DondorfChief Executive Officer(Chairman of the Management Board)
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


Parent
------

First Lancaster Bancshares, Inc.

                                        State or Other
                                        Jurisdiction of       Percentage
Subsidiaries (1)                         Incorporation        Ownership
----------------                        ---------------       ----------

First Lancaster Federal Savings Bank    United States            100%

First Lancaster Corporation (2)         Kentucky                 100%

-------------------------

(1)  The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in
     the consolidated financial statements contained in the financial statements
     attached hereto as an exhibit.
(2)  First Lancaster Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of First Lancaster
     Federal Savings Bank.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Avenue Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, I, Sandra Thomas Watson, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                         |  |                         |  |                  
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------
|Signature                |  | Title                   |  | Date             
|/s/ SANDRA THOMAS WATSON |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | February 10, 2005
|Sandra Thomas Watson     |  |                         |  |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6400

FRANK ROBERT SCHLAEPFER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus SID HARKLEROAD, Administrator, Marion Correctional Institution; THEODIS BECK, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-02-66-1) Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Robert Schlaepfer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Frank Robert Schlaepfer, Jr., a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). This Court may only grant a certificate of appealability if the appellant makes a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Schlaepfer has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Schlaepfer’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Franklin Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 14, 2008
    /s/ Thomas H. SiemersThomas H. SiemersPresident and Chief Executive Officer 17