27620 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices 

Flight information display system/ 

baggage information display system/ 

gate information display system. 

Airside sweeper. 

Wildlife mitigation. 

PFC program administration. 

Airfield lighting upgrade. 

Operations/security vehicle. 

Federal inspection services finish. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicle. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection: 

Rehabilitate taxiways A, B, and C 

(design). 

Snow removal equipment/maintenance 

facility (design and construction). 

Rehabilitate taxiways A, B, and C 

(construction). 

Decision Date: April 26, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Breeden, Washington Airports 

District Office, (703) 661–1363. 

Public Agency: Horry County 

Department of Airports, Myrtle Beach, 

South Carolina. 

Application Number: 10–04–C–00– 

MYR. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $104,020,700. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: June 1, 

2010. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

January 1, 2032. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: 

Nonscheduled/on-demand air 

carriers, filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information submitted in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Myrtle 

Beach International Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Terminal capacity enhancement 

program (TCEP)—terminal facility. 

TCEP—airfield improvements. 

TCEP—airport roads. 

Decision Date: April 28, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anna Guss, Atlanta Airports District 

Office, (404) 305–7146. 

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No., 

city, state 

Amendment 

approved 

date 

Original 

approved 

net PFC 

revenue 

Amended 

approved 

net PFC 

revenue 

Original 

estimated 

charge 

exp. date 

Amended 

estimated 

charge 

exp. date 

99–03–C–O1–CIC, Chico, CA ................................... 04/01/10 $25,000 $19,822 02/01/01 02/01/01 

06–07–C–00–DBQ, Dubuque, IA .............................. 04/06/10 153,046 49,761 11/01/06 11/01/06 

06–08–C–02–DBQ, Dubuque, IA .............................. 04/06/10 288,718 246,105 03/01/08 03/01/08 

94–01–C–01–SLK, Saranac Lake, NY ...................... 04/07/10 121,952 120,749 09/01/07 09/01/07 

97–07–C–01–OAK, Oakland, CA .............................. 04/12/10 33,011,496 23,825,854 06/01/99 06/01/99 

99–08–C–01–OAK, Oakland, CA .............................. 04/12/10 12,251,844 11,737,121 07/01/00 07/01/00 

00–09–C–02–OAK, Oakland, CA .............................. 04/12/10 33,380,000 17,394,806 02/01/03 02/01/03 

01–10–C–02–OAK, Oakland, CA .............................. 04/12/10 32,000,000 20,640,754 09/01/03 09/01/03 

02–11–C–01–OAK, Oakland, CA .............................. 04/12/10 7,000,000 5,402,257 12/01/03 12/01/03 

02–06–C–09–MSY, New Orleans, LA ....................... 04/15/10 271,336,494 287,977,095 09/01/18 12/01/19 

09–10–C–01–MSY, New Orleans, LA ....................... 04/15/10 70,531,906 52,805,580 08/01/26 06/01/26 

02–02–C–01–RDD, Redding, CA .............................. 04/19/10 1,251,567 1,124,987 07/10/07 04/01/07 

Issued in Washington, DC on May 7, 2010. 

Joe Hebert, 

Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger 

Facility Charge Branch. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11470 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. FMCSA–1999–5578; FMCSA– 

1999–5748; FMCSA–1999–6156; FMCSA– 

1999–6480; FMCSA–2000–8398; FMCSA– 

2003–15892; FMCSA–2003–16564; FMCSA– 

2005–23099; FMCSA–2005–23238; FMCSA– 

2005–22194; FMCSA–2005–22727; FMCSA– 

2006–23773] 

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption 

Renewals; Vision 

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration (FMCSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of final disposition. 

SUMMARY: FMCSA previously 

announced its decision to renew the 

exemptions from the vision requirement 

in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Regulations for 31 individuals. FMCSA 

has statutory authority to exempt 

individuals from the vision requirement 

if the exemptions granted will not 

compromise safety. The Agency has 

concluded that granting these 

exemptions will provide a level of safety 

that will be equivalent to, or greater 

than, the level of safety maintained 

without the exemptions for these 

commercial motor vehicle (CMV) 

drivers. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical 

Programs, (202) 366–4001, 

fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, 

Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64– 

224, Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Access 

You may see all the comments online 

through the Federal Document 

Management System (FDMS) at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Background 

Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, 

FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2- 

year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption 

would likely achieve a level of safety 

that is equivalent to, or greater than, the 

level that would be achieved absent 

such exemption.’’ The statute also 

allows the Agency to renew exemptions 

at the end of the 2-year period. The 

comment period ended on April 21, 

2010 (75 FR 13653). 

Discussion of Comments 

FMCSA received one comment in this 

proceeding. The comment was in favor 

of the Federal vision exemption 

program. 

Conclusion 

The Agency has not received any 

adverse evidence on any of these drivers 

that indicates that safety is being 

compromised. Based upon its 

evaluation of the 31 renewal 

applications, FMCSA renews the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices 27621 

Federal vision exemptions for Scott E. 

Ames, Otto J. Ammer, Jr., Nick D. 

Bacon, Mark A. Baisden, Eric D. 

Bennett, Johnny W. Bradford, Sr., Levi 

A. Brown, Charlie F. Cook, Clifford H. 

Dovel, Arthur L. Fields, John W. Forgy, 

Glenn E. Gee, Rupert G. Gilmore, III, 

Albert L. Gschwind, Walter R. 

Hardiman, Michael W. Jones, Matthew J. 

Konecki, Paul E. Lindon, John K. Love, 

Jack D. Miller, Eric M. Moats, Sr., Robert 

W. Nicks, Joseph S. Nix, IV, Monte L. 

Purciful, Luis F. Saavedra, Earl W. 

Sheets, Robert V. Sloan, Steven L. 

Valley, Thomas E. Voyles, Jr., Darel G. 

Wagner and Bernard J. Wood. 

In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) 

and 31315, each renewal exemption will 

be valid for 2 years unless revoked 

earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will 

be revoked if: (1) The person fails to 

comply with the terms and conditions 

of the exemption; (2) the exemption has 

resulted in a lower level of safety than 

was maintained before it was granted; or 

(3) continuation of the exemption would 

not be consistent with the goals and 

objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. 

Issued on: May 4, 2010. 

Larry W. Minor 

Associate Administrator for Policy and 

Program Development. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11708 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. FMCSA–1999–5748; FMCSA– 

2001–11426; FMCSA–2002–11714; FMCSA– 

2008–0021] 

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption 

Applications; Vision 

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration (FMCSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of renewal of 

exemptions; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its 

decision to renew the exemptions from 

the vision requirement in the Federal 

Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for 12 

individuals. FMCSA has statutory 

authority to exempt individuals from 

the vision requirement if the 

exemptions granted will not 

compromise safety. The Agency has 

concluded that granting these 

exemption renewals will provide a level 

of safety that is equivalent to, or greater 

than, the level of safety maintained 

without the exemptions for these 

commercial motor vehicle (CMV) 

drivers. 

DATES: This decision is effective May 

30, 2010. Comments must be received 

on or before June 16, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

bearing the Federal Docket Management 

System (FDMS) Docket ID FMCSA– 

1999–5748; FMCSA–2001–11426; 

FMCSA–2002–11714; FMCSA–2008– 

0021, using any of the following 

methods. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility; 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

• Fax: 1–202–493–2251. 

Each submission must include the 

Agency name and the docket number for 

this Notice. Note that DOT posts all 

comments received without change to 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information included in a 

comment. Please see the Privacy Act 

heading below. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov at any time or 

Room W12–140 on the ground level of 

the West Building, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The 

FDMS is available 24 hours each day, 

365 days each year. If you want 

acknowledgment that we received your 

comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or 

postcard or print the acknowledgement 

page that appears after submitting 

comments on-line. 

Privacy Act: Anyone may search the 

electronic form of all comments 

received into any of our dockets by the 

name of the individual submitting the 

comment (or of the person signing the 

comment, if submitted on behalf of an 

association, business, labor union, etc.). 

You may review the DOT’s complete 

Privacy Act Statement in the Federal 

Register published on April 11, 2000 

(65 FR 19476). This information is also 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical 

Programs, (202) 366–4001, 

fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, 

Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64– 

224, Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, 

FMCSA may renew an exemption from 

the vision requirements in 49 CFR 

391.41(b)(10), which applies to drivers 

of CMVs in interstate commerce, for a 

two-year period if it finds ‘‘such 

exemption would likely achieve a level 

of safety that is equivalent to, or greater 

than, the level that would be achieved 

absent such exemption.’’ The procedures 

for requesting an exemption (including 

renewals) are set out in 49 CFR part 381. 

Exemption Decision 

This notice addresses 12 individuals 

who have requested renewal of their 

exemptions in accordance with FMCSA 

procedures. FMCSA has evaluated these 

12 applications for renewal on their 

merits and decided to extend each 

exemption for a renewable two-year 

period. They are: Guy M. Alloway, Joe 

W. Brewer, James D. Coates, Donald D. 

Dunphy, James W. Ellis, IV, John E. 

Engstad, David A. Inman, Lawrence C. 

Moody, Stanley W. Nunn, Bobby C. 

Spencer, Kevin R. Stoner, Marion E. 

Terry. 

The exemptions are extended subject 

to the following conditions: (1) That 

each individual has a physical 

examination every year (a) by an 

ophthalmologist or optometrist who 

attests that the vision in the better eye 

continues to meet the standard in 49 

CFR 391.41(b)(10), and (b) by a medical 

examiner who attests that the individual 

is otherwise physically qualified under 

49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual 

provides a copy of the ophthalmologist’s 

or optometrist’s report to the medical 

examiner at the time of the annual 

medical examination; and (3) that each 

individual provide a copy of the annual 

medical certification to the employer for 

retention in the driver’s qualification 

file and retains a copy of the 

certification on his/her person while 

driving for presentation to a duly 

authorized Federal, State, or local 

enforcement official. Each exemption 

will be valid for two years unless 

rescinded earlier by FMCSA. The 

exemption will be rescinded if: (1) The 

person fails to comply with the terms 

and conditions of the exemption; (2) the 

exemption has resulted in a lower level 

of safety than was maintained before it 

was granted; or (3) continuation of the 

exemption would not be consistent with 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES