alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.23






Exhibit 4.23

English Translation




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	NOTICE OF AMENDMENT OR CANCELLATION OF CONTRACT
	Client Name

	 	Unitec Europa, S.A.
	 	Date of Execution
	 	February 26, 2007
	Contract Number

	 	YL-UE-070302
	 	Total Volume
	 	20 mega watt
	Product Model &

Quantity

	 	YL120(23)P1335X990

YL180(23)P1335X990	 	 	 	 
	Unit Price

	 	2.83 EUR/WP
	 	Total Price
	 	56,600,000.00EUR
	Term of Payment

	 	payment by 90-day promissory note	 	 	 	 
	Time of Delivery

	 	Feb: 1 mega watt; Mar: 1 mega watt; Apr: 2 mega watt; May: 3 mega watt;
Jun: 3 mega watt; Jul: 3 mega watt; Aug: 3 mega watt; Sep: 2 mega watt;
Oct: 2 mega watt.






	 	 	 
	Upon consultation and negotiation with the other party, terms of the Contract shall be modified as follow:
	1.

	 	The Unit Price under the Contract shall be changed as: NO CHANGE
	2.

	 	The Time of Delivery shall be changed as: NO CHANGE
	 

	 	1) Change within current year o
	 

	 	2) Change cross-year o
	3.

	 	The remaining volume in the Contract after the cancellation:
	 

	 	Volume performed:

Volume remained:
	 

	 	
Reasons for changing or cancelling the Contract:
	 

	 	Losses and damages incurred to us due to the change or cancellation of the Contract:

Changing the total volume under the Contract:

Original total volume: 20 mega watt

New total volume: 20. 087640 mega watt

Reasons for amending the Contract are the following: In performing the 20 mega watt Contract, the last lot
to be shipped was less than container load. Upon mutual consultation, the other party expected for a full
container load for shipment. In accordance with the other party’s requirement, we shipped a 170 watt
container which was in excess of 87,690 watt than the volume originally agreed in the Contract.






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:

	 	Signature:
	 	Signature:	 	 
	/s/ Zelin Zhao
	 	/s/ Qian Zhang

/s/ Yan Ma
	 	/s/ Shuozhen Li	 	 
	Department Manager

	 	General Manager

(General Sales Company)
	 	COO
	 	General Manager
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2644 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2644

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand medicare 
             coverage of certain self-injected biologicals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2000

 Mr. Gorton (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Santorum, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. 
Stevens, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. L. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand medicare 
             coverage of certain self-injected biologicals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Innovation for Medicare 
Patients Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF SELF-INJECTED BIOLOGICALS.

    (a) Coverage.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended--
                    (A) in subparagraph (S), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (T), by inserting ``and'' after 
                the semicolon at the end; and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (T) the 
                following new subparagraph:
            ``(U) a self-injected biological (which is approved by the 
        Food and Drug Administration) that is prescribed as a complete 
        replacement for a drug or biological that would otherwise be 
        described in subparagraph (A) or (B);''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 
        section 1861(s)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1395x(s)(2)) are each amended by inserting ``(except as 
        provided in subparagraph (U))'' after ``biologicals''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
biologicals furnished on or after January 1, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 and Form S-8 of our
reports as of the dates and relating to the financial statements of the
companies listed below, which appear on the following pages of this Form 10-K.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Page
    Company                      Date of Report           Ref.                  Document
    -------                      --------------           ----                  --------
<S>                             <C>                       <C>         <C>
The Fortress Group, Inc.        March 12, 1998            F-1         Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year
                                                                      ended December 31, 1997
Combined Predecessor            February 20, 1997         F-23        Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
Companies                                                             ended December 31, 1997
</TABLE>

Price Waterhouse LLP

Washington, DC
March 31, 1998
# George H. W. Bush Cabinet Nominations

**

----

Article II, section 2 of the *Constitution* gives the Senate responsibility for considering and confirming the president's executive and judicial nominations.

**Key:**

R- Recess appointment.

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure
#### John L. Kelley, Respondent, v. New York State Railways, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant was not shown guilty of actionable negligence and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law.
5

New 

Additions to 

the National 

Collections 

 
Clockwise from top:

Seeds of Success/National Museum of Natural History

In 2012, the National Museum of Natural History acquired 1182 botanical vouchers in 27 acquisitions, all 

from the Seeds of Success (SOS) program. Established in 2001 by the Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM) in partnership with the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Millennium Seed Bank (MSB) SOS collects, 

conserves, and develops native plant materials for stabilizing, rehabilitating and restoring lands in the 

United States. The initial partnership between BLM and MSB quickly grew to include many additional 

partners, such as botanic gardens, arboreta, zoos, and municipalities. These SOS teams share a common 

protocol and coordinate seed collecting and species targeting efforts.

Emancipation Proclamation/National Museum of African American History and 

Culture

This printing of the Emancipation Proclamation was commissioned by John Murray Forbes, a Boston 

abolitionist, a month before the Proclamation took effect and was the only contemporary printing of the 

Proclamation in book form. The miniature pamphlet reportedly was issued by the tens of thousands to 

Union troops for distribution to African Americans along the front lines. It was Union Army policy to read 

the Proclamation aloud at public gatherings as troops moved through the South.

Animal Births/Smithsonian National Zoo

Although somewhat overshadowed by the birth and subsequent death of the panda cub, the National 

Zoo is celebrating the arrival of some precious animals with the birth of two cheetah cubs, two fishing 

cat kittens, two Cuban crocodiles, and a black howler monkey. Each birth represents a step forward in 

conservation efforts; some are the first offspring of their species at NZP.

Nike Flyknit Racer/Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum

Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum recently acquired Nike’s latest high performance running shoe, 

Flyknit Racer, which uses the most advanced knitting technology and only the most essential materials 

to create an ultra-light and fast racing shoe.

Madeleine Albright’s Suit/National Museum of American History

On Thursday May, 24, 2012, the National Museum of American History’s Division of Political History 

received a collection of material from former Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright. The donation 

represents Albright’s career at the United Nations and State Department and includes the suit worn for 

the public announcement of her 1996 nomination to be the sixty-fourth, and first female, Secretary of 

State; the briefcase she used as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations (UN) and later as Secretary of 

State; a Peacekeeper’s Helmet which she kept on the head of a bust of Adlai Stevenson in her office at 

the UN; and a “spare” dove pin she kept in her briefcase.
#### In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Charles A. Coutant, Deceased. Margaret B. Coutant, Appellant; Jennie Coutant Mason, Respondent.

Decree and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

s0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146350

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146350

COA: 312343

Kent CC: 11-002833-FC

SHAWN DOUGLAS SIMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Order entered August 15, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00479
- CV SHARLET O. MITCHELL, ET AL., Appellant s V. NUGGEHALI NEIL SATYU , M.D., ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 13
- 03855
- D 

### O RDER

Before the Court is appellee Nuggehali Satyu, M.D.’s August 13, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a brief. We GRANT appellee’s motion. Appellee Nuggehali Satyu, M.D. shall fi le his brief on or before September 8, 2014 . We caution appellee that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin
C. Quinn, President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:    August 8, 2006                             /s/ Kevin C. Quinn
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Kevin C. Quinn
                                                     President



                                       36
<PAGE>
MAINE	SUPREME	JUDICIAL	COURT Reporter	of	Decisions Decision: 20 20 ME 3 7 Docket: Cum

- 19

- 403 Submitted

On	B riefs : February	26,	2020 Decided: March	31,	2020
Panel: MEAD, GORMAN,	JABAR , HUMPHREY , HORTON,	and	CONNORS, JJ.

DAVID	F.	PAQUETTE

v.
DEPARTMENT	OF	CORRECTIONS

PER	CURIAM [¶1] Because	events	in	 the	Superior	Court	have	overtaken	 this	appeal,
we	dismiss	it	as	moot. [¶ 2 ] David	 F.	 Paquette,	 an	 inmate	 in the custody	 of	 the	 Maine Department	of	Corrections,	filed	an	action	in the Superior	Court (Cumberland County) against	the	Department. The	court	( Warren,	J .)	treated	the	action	as	a petition	 for	 review	 of	 agency action. See 5	 M.R.S.	 §§ 11001

- 11008	 (2018) ;
M.R.	Civ.	P.	80C

. After	 the	court	issued	an	order	requiring	Paquette	 to	show cause	 why	 his	 appeal	 should	 not	 be	 dismissed	 for	 failure	 to	 serve	 the Department	 pursuant	 to	 5	 M.R.S.	 § 11003(1),	 Paquette	 filed	 documents showing	 unsuccessful	 attempts	 to	 serve the	 Attorney	 General	 but	 not	 the Department	itself.2 [¶ 3 ] The	court	dismissed	Paquette’s	petition	 for	insufficient	serv ic e	of process.	 	 Paquette	 then	 filed	 a	 document	 making	 additional	 assertions regarding	his	service	efforts

. The	court	treated	that	fil ing	as	an	appeal. [¶ 4 ] A fter	the	appeal	was	docketed	in	the	Law	Court,	Paquette	filed	in the	 trial	 court	 a	 motion	 to	 serve	 the	 Department	 by	 mail	 and	 documents asserting	 that	 the	 Department	 had	 acknowledged	 receipt	 of	 process.	 	 We
entered	an	order	 that suspended	M.R.	App. P. 3(b)	 to	permit	 the	court	 to	act on	 Paquette’s	 assertions.	 	 The	 court	 revisited	 the	 service	 issue	 and	 granted Paquette	leave	to	effect	alternate	service. See M.R.	Civ.	P.	4(g)

. [¶5] The	 court	 has	 thus	 negated	 its	 dismissal	 of Paquette’s	 petition, rendering	this	appeal	moot. Cf. E.	Me.	Med.	Ctr.	v.	Me.	Health	Care	Fin.	Comm’n , 601	A.2d	99,	101	(Me.	1992)

. The	entry	is: Appeal	 dismissed

. R emanded	 for	 further proceedings consistent	with	this	opinion

.

David F. Paquette,	appellant pro	se Aaron	M.	Frey,	Attorney	General,	and	Jillian	R.	O’ Brien,	Asst.	Atty.	Gen.,	Office of	the	Attorney	General,	Augusta,	for	appellee	Department	of	Corrections

Cumberland	C o unty Superior	Court	docket	number	CV

- 2018

- 510 F OR C LERK R EFERENCE O NLY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the consolidated
financial statements of CNS Bancorp, Inc. for the twelve months ended December
31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,720,442
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,450,484
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,386,970
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     64,263,384
<ALLOWANCE>                                    418,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,765,818
<DEPOSITS>                                  68,906,887
<SHORT-TERM>                                   247,715
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,024,808
<LONG-TERM>                                    546,631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,531
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,569,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              91,765,818
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,849,360
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              748,961
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               754,418
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,352,739
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,195,863
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,231,843
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,120,896
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,580
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (755,000)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,521,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,123
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     104,123
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,434
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7,060
<LOANS-NON>                                    150,867
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               409,798
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              418,856
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           418,856
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Carl Boos and William A. Boos, Respondents, v. Knickerbocker Chocolate Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
# Reed Owen Smoot: A Featured Biography

**

----

Born in Salt Lake City in 1862, Reed Smoot became a successful entrepreneur and investor, as well as a leader in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Following his election to the Senate in 1903, Smoot's religious affiliation prompted a congressional inquiry by the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections. The "Smoot Hearings," as they were called, examined his church activities and led to Senate consideration of a "faith requirement" for admission to Congress. The chief concern was Smoot's election to the Church's Council of Twelve Apostles in 1900, a position he held until his death. The three-year inquiry resulted in the Utah senator retaining his Senate seat. The U.S. Senate had taken a stand in support of religious freedom for all Americans. Smoot served for a decade as chairman of the Finance Committee. In 1930, in the early days of the Great Depression, he co-authored the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, which increased tariffs on imports to record high levels. Reelected four times, Smoot failed in his bid for a sixth term in 1932 and subsequently retired to Utah.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 2, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00640

- CV

IN RE MAURER GROUP

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On September 17, 2019, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering

the petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on October 2, 2019

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of October, 2019

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CI06811 , styled The Maurer Group v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, et

al. , pending in the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa presiding.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000541

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION

TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARSHALL CHINEN, ESQ.,

SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PEARL K. KAHOOKAULANA;

STATE OF HAWAI#I – DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendants-Appellees, and DEANNA KAHOOKAULANA,

Real Party In Interest-Appellant, and JOHN and MARY DOES 1-20;

DOE PARTNERSHIPS, CORPORATIONS OR OTHER ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 3CC161000180)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Hiraoka, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellee U.S. Bank

Trust, N.A., As Trustee For LSF8 Master Participation Trust's

November 3, 2020 "Motion to Dismiss Appellant Deanna

Kahookaulana's [(Kahookaulana)] Notice of Appeal Filed

September 1, 2020" (Motion to Dismiss), and the record, it

appears we lack appellate jurisdiction over Kahookaulana's appeal

from Civil No. 3CC161000180, in the Circuit Court of the Third

Circuit.

The appeal is untimely because Kahookaulana did not

file her September 1, 2020 notice of appeal within thirty days

after entry of the May 11, 2020 Judgment or issuance of the

May 11, 2020 Writ of Ejectment, as required by Hawai#i Rules of

Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a)(1). There is no indication

in the record on appeal that the time to file the notice of

appeal was extended.

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000541

20-NOV-2020

09:09 AM

Dkt. 20 OGMD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

 "As a general rule, compliance with the requirement of

the timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional, . . .

and we must dismiss an appeal on our motion if we lack

jurisdiction." Grattafiori v. State, 79 Hawai#i 10, 13, 897 P.2d

937, 940 (1995) (citations, internal quotation marks, and

brackets omitted); see HRAP Rule 26(b) ("[N]o court or judge or

justice is authorized to change the jurisdictional requirements

contained in Rule 4 of these rules."). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to

Dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 20, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132980(17) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ERIC MARTIN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 132980 

 COA: 272384 

Saginaw CC: 06-061201-AH 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's March 26, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk