alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Modoc County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Modoc County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Alturas, CA. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure 
Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) 
and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose 
of the meeting is to review Resource Advisory Committee Project 
Applications.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 7, 2010, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Modoc National Forest Office, 
Conference Room, 800 West 12th St., Alturas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Hudson, Forest Supervisor and 
Designated Federal Officer, at (530) 233-8700; or Resource Advisory 
Coordinator, Stephen Riley at (530) 233-8771.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on June 7, 2010 will 
begin at 6 p.m., at the Modoc National Forest Office, Conference Room, 
800 West 12th St., Alturas, California, 96101. Agenda topics will 
include voting and discussion of project proposals that meet the intent 
of Public Law 110-343. Time will also be set aside for public comments 
at the beginning of the meeting.

    Dated: May 17, 2010.
Tom Hudson,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-12354 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John A. Schissel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BRE Properties, Inc., as amended; and

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                         |  |  |  |                          
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------
|Dated: February 20, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ John A. Schissel     
|                         |  |  |  | John A. Schissel         
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice President,
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00203

- CR

Courtney Adam Watts

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1236670D)

May 2 8 , 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to reflect

$334 in court costs . It is order ed that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as

modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_______________ Justice Bonnie Sudderth
**Exhibit 10.22**

 

 

**NOTICE OF STOCK OPTION AWARD**

 

                    

Division:

 

Dear                    : 

 

You have been identified as a key contributor and a person whose dedication and contribution make a difference. Because of this, CFB is pleased to award you             stock options. The options are awarded under the Commercial Federal Stock Option Plan at $27.06 per share. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors grantedyou this option on February 23, 2005 (Grant Date). The options have a three-year vesting schedule (33.33% of the options vest each of the next three years). The exercise price of the option will remain constant at $ 27.06 and your option to purchasethese shares is good through February 23, 2015 (10 years from the grant date). 

 

This letter is your official notice of your Stock Option Award. You should retain it with your important papers. This Option Award will be posted to your Optionee Statement by our Stock Option Plan Administrator, Transcentive, Inc. If youhave any questions or need any additional information regarding this award, please contact Jean McGrory at 612/929-2434 or Tom Drzaic at 402/514-5493, or extension 15493. 

 

Thanks again for your support during 2004. We look forward to your continued commitment as we work together at Commercial Federal to producesolid results in 2005 and beyond. 

 

Sincerely,
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 4, 2010, 2 p.m. to June 4, 2010, 4 p.m., Grand Hyatt Seattle, 721 Pine Street, Seattle, WA 98101 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 11, 2010, 75 FR 26261-26262.                

The meeting has been changed to a telephone assisted meeting at the National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. The meeting date and time have been changed to June 11, 2010, from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 14, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-12143 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1159
HENRY T. SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus IN RE: ______ PETITIONER THE HONORABLE DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-1573
HENRY T. SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus IN RE: ______ PETITIONER THE HONORABLE DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA95-3886-PJM)2 Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: August 2, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. No. 96-1159 affirmed and No. 96-1573 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry T. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: In No. 96-1159, Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court in No. 96-1159. Sanders v. Chasanow , No. CA-95-3886- PJM (D. Md. Jan. 17, 1996). Appellant also appeals from the district court's order denying a plethora of motions filed after the dismissal of his § 1983 action. Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The order was entered on February 23, 1996. Appellant's notice of appeal wasfiled on April 11, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension for the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal in No. 96-1573. We deny all of Appellant's outstanding motions, including his motions for writ of mandamus, to stay, for bail pending appeal, for expedited treatment, for sanctions, for default judgment, and to dismiss. We further deny Appellant's motions for transfer, correc-4 tion or modification of the record, for declaratory or injunctive relief, for conference, to treat his affidavit as a brief, toremand, for injunction, for hearing in banc, for prehearing conference. We also deny his motions to amend, for assignment, for judicial notice, for restoration of the argument calendar, for an order of contempt, for a show cause order, for special sessions, for an answer, and for affirmation of relief. Because these appeals have been consolidated, we deny Appellant's motion to consolidate as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 96-1159 - AFFIRMED No. 96-1573 - DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR CHESTER BANCORP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,926
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,192
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,407
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          50,252
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         54,842
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,843
<DEPOSITS>                                     102,247
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,340
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                828
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,888
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 145,843
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,950
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,550
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   807
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,307
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,557
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,300
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,007
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       33
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  42
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    804
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       695
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000101 28-MAR-2017 08:29 AM
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of AdvanSource Biomaterials Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael F. Adams, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                      | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Date: July 30, 2018                   | 
|                                      | 
|/s/ Michael F. Adams                  | 
|Michael F. Adams                      | 
|Chief Executive Officer and President | 



This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12134]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 4, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Hensley Family Limited Partnership, and its general partners, 
Jack L. Hensley and Connie D. Hensley, all of Kalispell, Montana; to 
retain control of Valley Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
retain control of Valley Bank of Kalispell, both of Kalispell, Montana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 17, 2010.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-12134 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Columbia Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg B.
Spear, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         3.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         4.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company for the period certified.

         This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by
reference into any of the Company's filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part
of the Report or under such Acts.

         Date: February 27, 2004    /s/ GREG B. SPEAR
                                    -----------------
                                    Greg B. Spear
                                    Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
                                     Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1950

PATRICIA KLAIBER; BRENDA MILLER,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

NICHOLAS RINALDI, individually, and in his

official capacity with the United States

Postal Service; B. J. THOMPSON, individually,

and in his official capacity with the United

States Postal Service; WILLIAM J. HENDERSON,

in his official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CA-99-541-1)

Submitted: December 18, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia Klaiber, Brenda Miller, Appellants Pro Se. David George

Karro, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Klaiber and Brenda Miller appeal the district court’s

order granting summary judgment to Appellees on all of their

employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Klaiber v.

Rinaldi, No. CA-99-541-1 (M.D.N.C. June 21, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of Forster Drilling
        Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that
        the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28,
        2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
        that
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ F.
        E.
        FORSTER, III
 F.E.
        Forster III
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Date:
        April 23, 2007
[ DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 12

- 1 5083

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11

- cv
- 21900

- CMA DREW ESTATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC,
Plaintiff

- Counter Defendant

- Appellee,

versus FANTASIA DISTRIBUTION, INC.,
Defendant

- Third Party Plaintiff Counter Claimant

- Counter Defendant

– Appellant.

__________ ______________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (November 8, 201 3)
Before MARTIN, JORDAN, and SU H RHEINRICH , * Circuit Judges. JORDAN, Circuit Judge:

* Honorable Richard F. Su h rheinrich , United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Case: 12-15083 Date Filed: 11/08/2013 Page: 1 of 22 In this appeal Fantasia Distribution, Inc. challenges the district court’s award of profits to Drew Estate Holding Company LLC , on its trademark infringement
claim under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act , 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A) . Among other things, Fantasia argues that the district court erred in not holding an evidentiary hearing on Drew Estate ’s motion for an award of profits under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). After this appeal was filed , the district court issued an indicative ruling, stating to us that it would hold an evidentiary hearing on profits if the matter were
remanded

. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1; Fed. R. App. P. 12.1. After having heard oral argument, we believe the best course is to remand the case to the district court to hold the requested evidentiary hearing and then enter a new judgment

— whatever that may be

— based upon its findings. Accordingly, the case is reman ded to the district court with instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of profits and to enter an amended final judgment based upon what transpires at the hearing. 1 This appeal is now closed. Any party may, of course, file a timely appea l from the amended final judgment.

REMANDED WITH DIRECT IONS .

1 In light of our decision, Fantasia’s pending motion to take judicial notice is denied as moot.

Case: 12-15083 Date Filed: 11/08/2013 Page: 2 of 2
v150341_10-30x2 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing




Exhibit 10.30.2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester County Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John A. Featherman III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



November 9, 2005


/s/ John A. Featherman III
----------------------------
John A. Featherman III
Chief Executive Officer