alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Archives of the United States Senate

**

----

**Senators' Papers and Archives**

The records created and maintained within a senator's office are the property of the senator. Most senators donate their collections to a research repository in their home state when they leave office. At the repository, those collections are made available to researchers after an appropriate amount of time has passed.

**Senate Committee and Administrative Archives**

Senate committee and administrative archival collections document floor activities, committee activities, and general Senate administration. They include legislative files, treaty files, presidential nominations files, government oversight files, committee investigative records, and records relating to impeachment proceedings. The collections also includes records of the Secretary's office, bills, resolutions, amendments, reports and executive communications—the same kinds of material that have been preserved among the Senate's archives since 1789.

**Center for Legislative Archives**

Committee and administrative records of the United States Senate are the legal property of the Senate and are preserved and made available by the Center for Legislative Archives at the National Archives and Records Administration. Other records from legislative branch support organizations, including the publications of the U.S. government from the Government Publishing Office and records of congressional commissions, are also preserved at the Center.

**Senate Rules and Statutes Governing Senate Records**

* * * * * * * * * * * *

**Reports of the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress**

Public Law 101-509 (November 5, 1990) created the Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress. The committee's function is to advise Congress and the Archivist of the United States on the management and preservation of the records of Congress. Minutes and reports are available at: https://www.archives.gov/legislative/cla/advisory-committee.

* * * * * * * * * *

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Related Links 

National Archives

How to Research the Collections of Former Senators

Photo Archives

### Questions about Senate History? 

Email a Senate historian:historian@sec.senate.gov
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28656-28657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,748]


New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., Formerly a Joint Venture of 
General Motors Corporation, and Toyota Motor Corporation, Including On-
Site Leased Workers From Corestaff, ABM Janitorial, and Toyota 
Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Fremont, CA; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to

[[Page 28657]]

apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on November 19, 2009, applicable 
to workers of New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., formerly a joint 
venture of General Motors Corporation and Toyota Motor Corporation, 
including on-site leased workers from Corestaff and ABM Janitorial, 
Fremont, California. The notice will be published in the Federal 
Register soon.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers assemble the 
Toyota Corolla and the Toyota Tacoma and used to assemble the Pontiac 
Vibe.
    The company reports that workers leased from Toyota Engineering and 
Manufacturing North America were employed on-site at the Fremont, 
California location of New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., formerly a 
joint venture of General Motors Corporation. The Department has 
determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of 
the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Toyota Engineering and 
Manufacturing North America working on-site at the Fremont, California 
location of New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., formerly a joint 
venture of General Motors Corporation and Toyota Motor Corporation.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,748 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., formerly a 
joint venture of General Motors Corporation and Toyota Motor 
Corporation, including on-site leased workers from Corestaff, ABM 
Janitorial, and Toyota Engineering and Manufacturing North America, 
Fremont, California, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after October 29, 2008, through November 19, 2011, 
and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial 
separation from employment on the date of certification through two 
years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 11th day of May, 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-12258 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officers of Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertify that to their knowledge and in their respective capacities that theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certification isattached (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date: May 8, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ ANTHONY S. MARUCCI                 |
|------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Name:  | Anthony S. Marucci                     |
|                   |   | Title: | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                   |   |   |                                   |
| Date: May 8, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ AVERY W. CATLIN                    |
|                   |   | Name:  | Avery W. Catlin                        |
|                   |   | Title: | Senior Vice President  and             |
|                   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                |

 

 

This certification shallnot be deemed “filed” for any purpose, nor shall it be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CelldexTherapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
225 

WARREN G. HARDING 

President Harding vetoed six bills, of which five were 

regular vetoes and one was a pocket veto. None was 

overridden. 

There were no bills vetoed in the first and third sessions of the Sixty-seventh Congress. 

Sixty-seventh Congress, Second Session 

Regular Vetoes 

1043 H.R. 77. 

For the consolidation of forest lands within the 

Clearwater, St. Joe, and Selway National Forests. 

Vetoed March 3, 1922. The veto message was laid 

before the House and referred to the Committee on 

Public Lands. (62 Cong. Rec. 3368). 

Veto unchallenged. 

1044 H.R. 6380. 

To amend an act entitled “An act to incorporate the 

Masonic Mutual Relief Association of the District of 

Columbia.” 

Vetoed January 20, 1922. The veto message was laid 

before the House, referred to the Committee on the 

District of Columbia, and printed as H.R. Doc. No. 

160.(62 Cong. Rec. 14911. 

Veto un~halle~ge~. 

1045 H.R. 6679. 

To amend section 108 of an act entitled “An act to 

codify, revise, and amend the laws relating to the judiciary,” approved March 3, 1911. 

Vetoed December 20, 1921. The veto message was laid 

before the House, referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, and printed as H.R. Doc. No. 142. (62 Cong. 

Rec. 668). 

Veto unchallenged. 
226 Warren G. Harding 

1046 H.R. 10874. 

To provide adjusted compensation for veterans of the 

World War, and for other purposes. 

Vetoed September 19, 1922. The veto message was laid 

before the House and printed as H.R. Doc. No. 396. 

(62 Cong. Rec. 12946, 12947). 

The House overrode the veto on September 20, 1922 

by a vote of 258 yeas to 54 nays. (62 Cong. Rec. 

13004). 

The Senate sustained the veto on September 20, 1922 

by a vote of 44 yeas to 28 nays. (62 Cong. Rec. 12999, 

13000). 

Veto sustained. 

Pocket Veto 

1047 H.R. 10672. 

To amend the act of July 24, 1919 entitled “An act 

making appropriations for the Department of Agriculture for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1920.” 

Pocket veto occurred after the 2d session of the 67th 

Congress had adjourned sine die on September 22, 

1922. The bill was presented to the President on September 15, 1922. (September 16, 1922, H. Jour., p. 

593; see also H.R. Doc. No. 493, 70th Cong., 2d sess., 

p. 42). 

Sixty-seventh Congress, Fourth Session 

Regular Veto 

1048 S. 3275. 

Granting pensions for service in the Civil War, the 

War with Mexico, and the War of 1812. 

Vetoed January 3, 1923. The veto message was laid 

before the Senate and printed as S. Doc. No. 281. (64 

Cong. Rec. 1175). 

Veto unchallenged.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Certification**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of BowaterIncorporated (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: August 4, 2004 /s/ Arnold M. Nemirow   Name: Arnold M. Nemirow Title: Chief Executive Officer
     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedisclosure document.
NATIONSBANC Mortgage Corporation
PO Box 35140
Louisville, KY 40232-5140


NationsBank

                  MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION CONCERNING COMPLIANCE
                    WITH THE USAP MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS


January 29, 1997

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, NationsBanc Mortgage Corporation
(the "Company"),  a wholly-owned  subsidiary of NationsBank of Texas,  N.A., has
complied in ALL material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION
PROGRAM  FOR  MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this same  period,  the  Company
maintained  fidelity bond coverage and mortgage  servicing  errors and omissions
coverage of $149,500,000 and $105,000,000, respectively.



/s/ Andrew D. Woodward, Jr.                  /s/ J. Mark Hanson
Andrew D. Woodward, Jr.                      J. Mark Hanson
President                                    Senior Vice President
                                             Servicing Director

/s/ Denise C. Sawyer                         /s/ H. Randall Chestnut
Denise C. Sawyer                             H. Randall Chestnut
Executive Vice President                     Senior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer                      Servicing Director

/s/ Gary K. Bettin
Gary K. Bettin
Senior Vice President
Director of Mortgage Operations



A subsidiary of NationsBank Corporation
<PAGE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fedders Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the Quarter ending
November 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Sal Giordano, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Sal Giordano, Jr.
-------------------------------------
Sal Giordano, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fedders Corporation and will be retained by Fedders Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                       27
Law Office of Gary E. Prust

1607 Nueces St.

Austin, TX 78701

(512)469-0092

Fax (512)469-9102

gary@prustlaw.com

December 16, 2015

Third District Court of Appeals

PO Box 12547

Austin, TX 78711-2547

Re: Edgar Sangillo v. The State of Texas

In the Third District Court of Appeals

Appeal Cause Numbers 03-15-00410-CR and 03-15-00411-CR

Trial Court Cause Numbers D-1-DC-12-200962 and D-1-DC-12-200963

To the Honorable Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk:

I submit this notice of appearance and designation of lead attorney in the above referenced 

cause numbers. I was appointed by order of the trial court on December 16, 2015. Please forward all 

notices and correspondence to my office or email listed above.

Very truly yours,

Gary E. Prust

Attorney at Law

cc: file, Mr. Sangillo, Travis County District Attorney

ACCEPTED

03-15-00411-CR

8274686

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

12/16/2015 8:32:53 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/16/2015 8:32:53 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 16 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES CARSON BREWINGTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

H. N. “SONNY” SCOTT, Warden;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 98-6356

(D. Ct. No. CV-97-521-R)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court denying federal habeas

corpus relief in petitioner’s action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 
- 2 -

Petitioner appeals on the grounds that he was denied due process of law by the

issuance of a summary opinion by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals and

that certain evidentiary rulings denied him a fair trial. The district court denied a

certificate of appealability and denied petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal. We decline to issue a certificate of appealability.

In this action, petitioner challenged his conviction in the district court of

Comanche County, Oklahoma, for first degree murder. Petitioner is currently

serving a life sentence on this conviction. On appeal he alleges that the district

court erred in finding that he was not deprived of due process of law in the

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals and that he was not denied a fair trial in the

Oklahoma trial court based on two evidentiary rulings.

The magistrate judge, in a thorough report and recommendation, examined

carefully the record and the law related to the issues raised by petitioner and

recommended to the district court that the petition for habeas corpus be denied. 

The district court adopted the magistrate’s report and recommendation, denied

habeas corpus relief, and denied a certificate of appealability and the motion to

proceed in forma pauperis. After our independent review of the record in this

matter, including the full trial transcript, and the relevant legal authority, we are

convinced that the magistrate judge correctly analyzed the issues on appeal. We 
- 3 -

therefore deny the certificate of appealability. The appeal is dismissed.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
Exhibit 23


                              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-36876) of FNB Corporation of our
reports dated February 1, 2002, January 31, 2003, February 2, 2004 and
February 18, 2005 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of FNB
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively, and the related consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the
years then ended appearing in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K of FNB
Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and in the
Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2004, and our report dated March 30, 2005 with respect to management's report
on internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of FNB Corporation appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of FNB Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004.


                                         s/Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P.
                                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Bluefield, West Virginia
April 15, 2005
NO. 07-10-0187-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL D MAY 18, 2010

__________________ ____________ In re DERRICK A. WALKER, Relator

__________________ _____________ Opinion on Original Proceed ing for Writ of Prohibition

__________________ _____________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Pending before the court is the application of Derrick A. Walker for a writ of prohibition barring the St ate from proceeding to adjudicate his guilt in Cause Nos. 3358 and 3404, 100th Judicial District Court, Hall County, Te xas. The writ is founded upon his belief that the proceeding contravenes t he restrictions against double jeopardy. That is, his having partially paid a “fine” assessed as a condition for deferring the adjudication of his guilt and being placed on community supervision bars the State from proceeding with its motion to adjudicate, t he argument goes. To adjudicate Walker’s guilt and ultimately levy sentence supposedly exposes him to being punished twice for the same offense. We deny the writ. Assuming arguendo that Walker complied with al l the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52, we note that his argument lacks merit. Having one’s2 adjudication of guilt deferr ed and being placed on communi ty supervision during that period is not tantamount to being sentenced and punished. Gardner v. State , No. 01- 01-1226-CR, 2002 Tex. App. L EXIS 7464 *3 (Tex. App.

– Houston [1st Dist.] October 17, 2002, no pet.) (not desi gnated for publication); Tackett v. State , 989 S.W.2d 855, 858- 59 (Tex. App.

– Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. ref’ d). Thus, complying with the conditions of his continued pr obation or community super vision, which includes the payment of a “fine,” does not mean that he has completed or been subjected to some aspect of punishment as contemplated by the Double Jeop ardy Clause. Gardner v. State, supra. The request for a writ of prohibition is denied.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, of Commercial Federal Corporation as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2004 (the Report), I, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge, the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Commercial Federal Corporation.



Date: March 1, 2004



By:

/s/ William A. FitzgeraldWilliam A. Fitzgerald Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer/s/ David S. FisherDavid S. Fisher Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Commercial Federal Corporation and will be retained by Commercial Federal Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



46
<PAGE>
                         CASTAING, HUSSEY & LOLAN, LLP
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                       525 WEEKS STREET - P.O. BOX 14240
                           NEW IBERIA, LA 70582-4240
                           -------------------------
                            PH: (318) 364-7221
                           FAX: (318) 364-7235





                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 1-14364) of our report dated January 31, 1997 appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acadiana Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 1996.


New Iberia, Louisiana
March 26, 1997