alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2439

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the construction of the

Southeastern Alaska Intertie system, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 13, 2000

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the construction

of the Southeastern Alaska Intertie system, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That there is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the

4 Secretary of Energy such sums as may be necessary to

5 assist in the construction of the Southeastern Alaska

6 Intertie system as generally identified in Report #97–01

7 of the Southeast Conference. Nothing in this Act shall be

8 construed to limit or waive any otherwise applicable State
2

S 2439 IS

1 or Federal law, including, but not limited to environmental

2 laws, relating to funding for or construction of the system.

Æ
#### GOLDEN VALLEY COUNTY, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent, v. HUGH EGAN, et al. Appellants.

(203 N. W. 320.)

Tixis ease is governed by the decision rendered in Golden Valley County v. Lundin, ante, 420.

Opinion filed March 21, 1925.

Appeal from the District Court of Golden Valley County, *Pugh,*J.

Defendants appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to' the complaint.

Affirmed.

*Crawford, Cain & Burnett,*for appellants.

*H. L. Tlalliday,*and *Murtha & Sturgeon,*for respondent.

ChristiansoN, Ch. J.

This case was submitted witb Golden Valley County v. Lundin, ante, 420, 203 N. W. 317. Tbe question involved in the two cases are identical. And on the authority of Golden Valley County v. Lundin, supra, the order appealed from in this case is affirmed.

Birdzjgix, Nuessee, Burxe, and JohNsow, JJ. concur.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of SIGA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Luckshire, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Daniel J. LuckshireDaniel J. LuckshireExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerMarch 9, 2011


---
warranted. Pan v. 

### Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d

840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the parties' arguments, we conclude that our intervention is warranted. 

### Id. Specifically, an order dismissing the underlying case was entered in July 2012. This order constituted a final judgment, as it effectively resolved all the parties' claims. 

### Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000). "[O]nce a final judgment is entered, the district court lacks jurisdiction to reopen it, absent a proper and timely motion under the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure." 

### SFPP, L.P. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 608, 612, 173 P.3d 715, 717 (2007). Thus, if real party in interest wanted to challenge the July 2012 dismissal order, such a challenge needed to be made in conformity with the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure. Because her August 2013 "Motion to Re-Open Case" failed in this regard, the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant the motion. 

### Id.; see NRCP 60(b) (providing generally that a party must file a motion for relief from judgment within six months from when written notice of entry of the order is served on that party). 2

As any further proceedings before the district court in this matter would be in excess of the district court's jurisdiction, our intervention is warranted. 

### SFPP, L.P., 123 Nev. at 612, 173 P.3d at 718; 

### Greene, 115 Nev. at 396, 990 P.2d at 187. Accordingly, we

2 Real party in interest does not dispute that she received notice of entry of the July 2012 dismissal order. Nor does she dispute receiving notice of the other post-dismissal filings in this matter, including petitioner's October 2012 "Request For Trial De Novo." Real party in interest suggests that this filing demonstrates that both sides were under the mistaken belief that the case had not been dismissed. A review of this filing demonstrates that real party in interest's suggestion is meritless.

SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA
(0) 1947A

### ORDER the petition GRANTED AND DIRECT THE CLERK

OF THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF PROHIBITION directing the district court to vacate its October 4, 2013, order and precluding the district court from conducting any further proceedings in District Court Case No. A631056.

Pickering

Saitta

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Law Offices of David M. Jones/Las Vegas Gazda & Tadayon Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF 

### 3 NEVADA
(0) I947A )(ZIW
ACTION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE VIA ELECTRONIC BALLOT

DECEMBER 9, 2015

VOTED that the Board of Regents honors the memory of David M. Silfen and recognizes his 

extraordinary service by awarding him the Regents’ Gold Medal for Exceptional Service, in 

grateful recognition of his dedication and many contributions to the Board of Regents and the 

Smithsonian Institution.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 97 (Thursday, May 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12173]


Mississippi Disaster <greek-i>MS-00038 Declaration of Economic 
Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Mississippi, dated 05/13/2010.
    Incident: Deepwater BP Oil Spill.
    Incident Period: 04/20/2010 and continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/13/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/14/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: George, Hancock, Harrison, Jackson, Pearl River, 
Stone.
Contiguous Counties and Parishes:
    Mississippi: Forrest, Greene, Lamar, Marion, Perry.
    Alabama: Mobile.
    Louisiana: Saint Tammany, Washington.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere..      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 121730
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: May 13, 2010.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-12073 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Wolfgang Dondorf, Chairman of the Management Board,
hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology AG. By:
    /s/  Wolfgang DondorfWolfgang DondorfChairman of the Management BoardFebruary 24, 2005 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Pfeiffer Vacuum
Technology AG for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6430

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 04-6807

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-98; CA-03-53-7-F; CA-00-206-F)

Submitted: July 26, 2004 Decided: August 10, 2004
- 2 -

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

No. 04-6430 dismissed; No. 04-6807 affirmed by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon,

James, Assistant United States Attorney, Paul Martin Newby, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000), denying a certificate of appealability, and denying

a motion for return of property in a criminal case. An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Graham has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Graham’s motion for a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal in 04-6430.

The district court order appealed from in 04-6807, regarding the

motion for return of property in a criminal case, is affirmed. The

district court properly denied Graham’s motion for return of

property because the issue was previously decided by the district

court and is pending on appeal. We dispense with oral argument
- 4 -

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

No. 04-6430 DISMISSED

No. 04-6807 AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28628-28629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1897-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


New Jersey; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-1897-DR), dated April 2, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of New Jersey is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of April 2, 2010.

    Burlington County for Individual Assistance.
    Cumberland and Ocean Counties for Individual Assistance and 
Public Assistance.
    Gloucester County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).
    Hunterdon County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially

[[Page 28629]]

Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 
Hazard Mitigation Grant.


W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-12195 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Zomax Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Rueckl, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  March  30, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Robert J. Rueckl    |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Robert J. Rueckl        |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |
Order entered May 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01460-CR

WILLIAM BLOUNT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1158965-T

ORDER

In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The 

record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs 

assessed in this case.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization 

of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court 

appointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a 

document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 29364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCO922000-L13100000-FI0000; COC63019]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
COC63019

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC63019 from Maverick 
Whitewater, LLC and PHT Whitewater, LLC, for lands in Delta County, 
Colorado. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the 
rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM, Milada Krasilinec, Land Law 
Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (303) 239-3767.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16 \2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease COC63019 
effective January 1, 2009, under the original terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

Helen M. Hankins,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-12460 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
402347-v1 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SULLIVAN HILL REZ & ENGEL Electronically Filed April 30, 2019

A Professional Law Corporation

James P. Hill, SBN 90478

Christopher V. Hawkins, SBN 222961

600 B Street, Suite 1700

San Diego, California 92101

Tel: (619) 233-4100

Email: hill@sullivanhill.com

hawkins@sullivanhill.com

Gerald Singleton, SBN 208783

Amanda W. LoCurto, SBN 265420

SINGLETON LAW FIRM, APC

450 A Street, 5th Floor

San Diego, CA 92101

Tel: (619) 771-3473

Email: gerald@slffirm.com

amanda@slffirm.com

Attorneys for SLF Fire Victim Claimants

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re

PG&E CORPORATION,

and

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 

COMPANY

Debtors

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 19-30088 (DM)

Chapter 11

(Lead Case)

(Jointly Administered)

NOTICE OF JOINDER BY THE SLF FIRE 

VICTIM CLAIMANTS IN EX PARTE 

APPLICATION OF THE OFFICIAL 

COMMITTEE OF TORT CLAIMANTS 

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF 

BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 2004 FOR 

ORDERS AUTHORIZING PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS [ECF 1767]

Date: N/A

Time: N/A

Place: 1160 Battery Street, East, Suite 100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Affects:

PG&E Corporation

Pacific Gas & Electric Company

Both Debtors

*All papers shall be filed in the Lead Case,

No. 19-30088 (DM)

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1771 Filed: 04/30/19 Entered: 04/30/19 15:34:08 Page 1 of

2
402347-v1 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO: HONORABLE DENNIS MONTALI AND ALL INTERESTED PARTIES: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that The Singleton Law Firm Fire Victim Claimants (“SLF 

Claimants”), consisting of over 4,800 individuals who suffered injuries and damages in the fires 

started by PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company and who are represented by 

their attorneys, the Singleton Law Firm, APC1 and Sullivan Hill Rez & Engel, A Professional Law 

Corporation, hereby join in the Ex Parte Application of the Official Committee of Tort Claimants 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 for Orders Authorizing Production of 

Documents [ECF 1767].

Dated: April 30, 2019 SULLIVAN HILL REZ & ENGEL

A Professional Law Corporation

By: /s/ Christopher V. Hawkins

James P. Hill

Christopher V. Hawkins

Attorneys for SLF Fire Victim Claimants

 

1 While there are other firms involved in the representation of the SLF Claimants, because each fire has a different 

group of firms involved, this group is referred to as the “SLF Claimants” for ease of reference.

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1771 Filed: 04/30/19 Entered: 04/30/19 15:34:08 Page 2 of

2