Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Proposed Rules 27977 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

Tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on Tribal governments or preempt 

Tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Particulate matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 30, 2010. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11984 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 10–754; MB Docket No. 10–81; RM– 

11600] 

FM Table of Allotments, Fairbanks, 

Alaska 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This document sets forth a 

proposal to amend the FM Table of 

Allotments. The Commission requests 

comment on a petition filed by 

Educational Media Foundation 

proposing the allotment of FM Channels 

224C2 and 232C2 as the thirteenth and 

fourteenth local service at Fairbanks, 

Alaska. Both stations can be allotted at 

Fairbanks in compliance with the 

Commission’s minimum distance 

separation requirements with a site 

restriction of 9.4 km (5.9 miles) north of 

Fairbanks, at 64–55–20 North Latitude 

and 147–42–49 West Longitude. 

Concurrence in the allotments by the 

Government of Canada is required 

because the proposed allotments are 

located within 320 kilometers (199 

miles) of the U.S.–Canadian border. See 

Supplementary Information infra. 

DATES: The deadline for filing comments 

is 30 days following publication in the 

Federal Register. Reply comments must 

be filed on or before 15 days following 

the deadline for initial comments. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., 

Washington, DC 20554. In addition to 

filing comments with the FCC, 

interested parties should serve counsel 

for petitioner as follows: Karen A. Ross, 

Esq., David D. Oxenford, Esq., Davis 

Wright Tremaine LLP, 1919 

Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 200, 

Washington, D.C. 20006. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau, 

(202) 418–2180. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

10–81, adopted April 30, 2010, and 

released May 3, 2010. The full text of 

this Commission decision is available 

for inspection and copying during 

normal business hours in the FCC 

Reference Information Center (Room 

CY–A257), 445 12th Street, S.W., 

Washington, D.C. 20554. The complete 

text of this decision may also be 

purchased from the Commission’s copy 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 

445 12th Street, SW, Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC, 20554, (800) 378–3160, 

or via the company’s website, 

www.bcpiweb.com. This document 

does not contain proposed information 

collection requirements subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

proposed information collection burden 

‘‘for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506 (c)(4). 

The Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. Members of the public 

should note that from the time a Notice 

of Proposed Rule Making is issued until 

the matter is no longer subject to 

Commission consideration or court 

review, all ex parte contacts are 

prohibited in Commission proceedings, 

such as this one, which involve channel 

allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for 

rules governing permissible ex parte 

contacts. 

For information regarding proper 

filing procedures for comments, see 47 

CFR 1.415 and 1.420. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR 

part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 

336. 

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Alaska, is amended 

by adding Channels 224C2 and 232C2 at 

Fairbanks. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
27978 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11965 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–S 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1