alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oxford ResidentialProperties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chiefexecutive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalentof the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
¥42-/5*

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA #14-13-00769-CR

STYLE: Shawn Mayreis vThe State of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed

DATE: March 24, 2015 Publish: Yes

OFFENSE: Capital Murder

COUNTY: Harris

th TRIAL COURT: 184in District Court

TC CASE #: 1340556

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Shawn Mavreis v The State of Texas

CCA#

PRO S£ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: Qhfaljr

JUDGE: \J± LlvU4~^-.

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

H^L'IS

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
NO. SCPW-12-0000432

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

MICHAEL TIERNEY, Petitioner,

vs.

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ICA No. 29993)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of

the May 17, 2012 order denying the petition for a writ of

mandamus,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 30, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-12-0000432

30-MAY-2012

12:53 PM
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 12172]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declaration for the State of Florida, dated 05/13/2010. *Incident:*
                         Deepwater BP Oil Spill. *Incident Period:*
                         04/20/2010 and continuing.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         05/13/2010. *EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/14/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Bay, Citrus, Dixie, Escambia, Franklin, Gulf, Hernando, Hillsborough, Jefferson, Levy, Manatee, Okaloosa, Pasco, Pinellas, Santa Rosa, Sarasota, Taylor, Walton. *Contiguous Counties:* Florida: Alachua, Calhoun, Charlotte, Desoto, Gilchrist, Hardee, Holmes, Jackson, Lafayette, Leon, Liberty, Madison, Marion, Polk, Sumter, Wakulla, Washington. Alabama: Baldwin, Covington, Escambia, Geneva. Georgia: Brooks, Thomas. The Interest Rates are:
                    ( print page 28311) PercentBusinesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere:
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 121720. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Florida, Alabama, Georgia. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002) Dated: May 13, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-12072 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### William Satterfield, plaintiff in error, *vs.*A. Shwab and Company, defendants in error.

The statute of limitations was suspended from December, 1860, to the first of December, 1861, and again from November 8th, 1865, to July, 1868, and an account which became due in August, 1861, and was sued on July 13th, 1869, was not barred. (K..)

Statute of limitations. Before Judge Parrott. Bartow Superior Court. March Term, 1872.

For the facts of this case see the decision.

John W. Wofford, represented by Henry Jackson *&*Brother, for plaintiff in error.

Warren Akin, for defendants.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs brought their action against the defendant on an open account for goods purchased in June, 1861, and which became due on the 21st of August, 1861. Suit was commenced on the 13th day of July, 1869. The defendant pleaded the statute of limitations in bar of the plaintiff’s right to recover. The jury, under the charge of the Court, found a verdict for the plaintiffs. The Court charged the jury that the statute of limitations was suspended from the month of December, 1860, to the 1st of December, 1861, and was again legally suspended on the 8th of November, 1865, and did not commence to run again until the month of July, 1868, and that an account made in the year 1861, which became due in August of that year, and sued on the 13th of July, 1869, was not barred by the statute of limitations unless four years had elapsed from the 1st of December, 1861, to the 8th of November, 1865, to which charge the defendant excepted. In our judgment, there was .no error in the' charge of the Court to the jury, and that the plain*120tiffs’ right of action was not barred by the statute of limitations, under the laws of this State.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2661

To suspend temporarily the duty on machines, and their parts, for use

in the manufacture of digital versatile discs (DVDs).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25, 2000

Mr. COVERDELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on machines, and their

parts, for use in the manufacture of digital versatile

discs (DVDs).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:
2

•S 2661 IS

‘‘ 9902.84.18 Aluminum sputter machines,

whether imported

as an entirety, or

in components,

or parts thereof,

for use in the

manufacture of

digital versatile

discs (DVDs)

(provided for in

subheading

8479.89.97) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/03 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

I, Robert J. Rueckl, Chief Financial Officer of Zomax Incorporated,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-K of Zomax Incorporated;

 

2                  Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:   March 12, 2004 | /s/ Robert J. Rueckl    |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                        | Robert J. Rueckl        |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
|                              |   |                                                            |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  May 8,      2009 | By:    | /s/Fred      Abdula                                        |   |
|                              |   | Fred      Abdula                                                |   |
|                              |   | Chairman      of the Board ofDirectors      and President  |   |

| Date:  May 8,      2009 | By:    | /s/Thomas      M. Nemeth                |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   | Thomas      M. Nemeth              |   |
|                              |   | Vice      President and Treasurer  |   |
|                              |   |                                    |   |
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2533

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Red 264.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10, 2000

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Red 264.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT RED 264.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.47 Pigment Red 264

(CAS No.

88949–33–1)

(provided for in

subheading

3204.17.6085) ... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•S 2533 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Chester CountyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Eric Segal, Interim Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(3)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(4)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  July 26, 2010 |                             |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                      | /s/  Eric A. Segal               |
|                      | Eric  A. Segal                   |
|                      | Interim  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Edward F. Lange, Jr. hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of BRE Properties, Inc. (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BRE Properties, Inc.



|                         |  |                                                                                                   
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 15, 2008 |  | /s/ Edward F. Lange, Jr.                                                                          
|                         |  | Edward F. Lange, Jr. Executive Vice
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# States in the Senate | Ohio

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Sherrod Brown (D)***Hometown: Cleveland*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**J.D. Vance (R)***Hometown: Cincinnati*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Ohio became the 17th state to join the Union on February 19, 1803. A 1953 resolution of Congress changed Ohio's date of statehood to March 1, 1803, to reflect the date when Ohio's state legislature first met. Ohio’s first two senators, John Smith and Thomas Worthington, took office on April 1, 1803. Ohio’s longest-serving senators include John Sherman (1861-1877; 1881-1897) and John Glenn (1974-1999). Among those who rose to leadership positions are Benjamin Wade and Allen Thurman, who served as the Senate’s president pro tempore, and Robert A. Taft, who became Republican floor leader. In 1920 Ohio senator Warren G. Harding became the first sitting senator to be elected president of the United States.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2571 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2571

 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of 
                            athletic shoes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2000

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of 
                            athletic shoes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the United States 
Customs Service shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate each drawback claim as 
filed described in subsection (b).
    (b) Drawback Claims.--The drawback claims referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following claims, filed between August 1, 1993 and June 1, 
1998:

                            Drawback Claims

221-0590991-9
221-0890500-5 through 221-0890675-5
221-0890677-1 through 221-0891427-0
221-0891430-4 through 221-0891537-6
221-0891539-2 through 221-0891554-1
221-0891556-6 through 221-0891557-4
221-0891559-0
221-0891561-6 through 221-0891565-7
221-0891567-3 through 221-0891578-0
221-0891582-0
221-0891584-8 through 221-0891587-1
221-0891589-7
221-0891592-1 through 221-0891597-0
221-0891604-4 through 221-0891605-1
221-0891607-7 through 221-0891609-3
    (c) Payment of Amounts Due.--Any amounts due pursuant to the 
liquidation or reliquidation of the claims described in subsection (b) 
shall be paid not later than 90 days after the date of such liquidation 
or reliquidation.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



For the fiscal year ended 2008, the non-employee directors of Quest Resource
Corporation (the “Company”) received the following compensation:




	 	•	 	annual director fee of $50,000 per year;
	 
	 	•	 	annual fee of $7,500 per year for the Audit Committee chairperson;
	 
	 	•	 	annual fee of $5,000 per year for any other committee chairperson; and
	 
	 	•	 	a grant of 5,000 shares of common stock of the Company immediately
following the annual meeting of stockholders.





Additionally, the Chairman of the Board, a non-employee director, received a
$30,000 pro rated fee based on length of service.



In March 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a change to the
structure of the non-employee directors’ compensation, effective January 1,
2009, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee as follows:






	 	•	 	annual director fee of $125,000 per year;
	 
	 	•	 	annual fee of $10,000 per year for the Audit Committee chairperson; and
	 
	 	•	 	annual fee of $5,000 per year for any other committee chairperson.





     Additionally,
the Chairman of the Board, a non-employee director, will receive an annual fee of
$30,000 per year.




No equity
awards will be paid to the non-employee directors for 2009.
## \h OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308; CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

# ;.-- '•-'•'•S'TAfiwfEMB•$$$> * J PENALTYFOGS #/oC 4/8/2015 «VATEUSE "*'* "*' SIERRA, CORY ESTRADA T^iS' is to advise that the CourtTias^denigci without written order motion for leave to 

### me the original application for writ^o©naodamus. Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 SW 3d 

## 805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). -***xe&: Abel Acosta, Clerk 

# trfQ^feSS^P^CRA'^FROMZKWR.ec^.os ,0 ^ 2 v*£-* ^&£&&Vi±JJig?AEl

02 1R 0002003152 APR 09

•!ll> 

### -.TM^ORY ESTRADASIERRA 

## Beto Unit ;;j 

## 1391 FM 3328 1,'j Tennessee Colony, TX 75880 "DC #1341616 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATONS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         930,316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  417,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,951
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      24,091,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,671,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     21,899,811
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,387,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,671,696
<SALES>                                      4,210,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,228,200
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,233,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,330,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (593,794)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (593,794)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (593,794)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE VALUE IS $0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FILING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>