alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-15083

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-21900-CMA

DREW ESTATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, 

 Plaintiff - Counter Defendant -Appellee,

 versus

FANTASIA DISTRIBUTION, INC., 

 Defendant - Third Party Plaintiff

 Counter Claimant - Counter Defendant –Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(November 8, 2013)

Before MARTIN, JORDAN, and SUHRHEINRICH,

* Circuit Judges.

JORDAN, Circuit Judge:

 * Honorable Richard F. Suhrheinrich, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by 

designation. 

Case: 12-15083 Date Filed: 11/08/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

In this appeal Fantasia Distribution, Inc. challenges the district court’s award 

of profits to Drew Estate Holding Company LLC, on its trademark infringement 

claim under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A). Among other 

things, Fantasia argues that the district court erred in not holding an evidentiary 

hearing on Drew Estate’s motion for an award of profits under 15 U.S.C. §

1117(a). After this appeal was filed, the district court issued an indicative ruling,

stating to us that it would hold an evidentiary hearing on profits if the matter were 

remanded. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1; Fed. R. App. P. 12.1. After having heard oral 

argument, we believe the best course is to remand the case to the district court to 

hold the requested evidentiary hearing and then enter a new judgment—whatever 

that may be—based upon its findings.

Accordingly, the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to 

hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of profits and to enter an amended final 

judgment based upon what transpires at the hearing. 1

 This appeal is now closed.

Any party may, of course, file a timely appeal from the amended final judgment. 

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

 1 In light of our decision, Fantasia’s pending motion to take judicial notice is denied as moot. 

Case: 12-15083 Date Filed: 11/08/2013 Page: 2 of 2
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No.33-99777and Form S-3 No. 33-99777-01) and related Prospectuses of Crescent Real Estate Equities LimitedPartnership and Crescent Finance Company of our report dated February 28, 2007, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of Americold Realty Trust and Subsidiaries which (i) expresses anunqualified opinion, and (ii) contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the December 31, 2006adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158 “Employers’ Accounting for DefinedBenefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans — an amendment to FASB Statements No. 87,88, 106, and 132R”, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Crescent Real Estate EquitiesLimited Partnership and Crescent Finance Company for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/Deloitte & Touche, LLPAtlanta, Georgia
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-05-00173- CV
App e lla nt , W or ld A c c e ss T e le c om m unic at ion s G r oup, Inc .// Cr os s- App e lla nt s, St at e wide Ca lli ng, Inc . d/b/aCo m m unity Se r vic e s; St at e wide LJR ; S ta te wide Bulv e r de ; S ta te wide M c Al le n; and M ike F ine

v. App e lle e s, St at e wide Ca lli ng, Inc . d/b/aCo m m unity Se r vic e s; St at e wide LJR ; S ta te wide Bulv e r de ; S ta te wide M c Al le n; and M ike F ine //C r os s- App e lle e , W or ld A c c e ss

Telecom m uni cations Gr oup, I nc.

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF COM AL COUNTY , 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2002- 729- C, HO NORAB LE CHARLES R. RAMSAY , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N
World Acce ss Telec ommunications Group, Inc. (World Acc ess), ha s filed a motion to dismi ss the cross a

ppeal f il ed by Statewide Calling , Inc. d/b/a Community Service s; St atewide L J R; Statewide Bulverde ; Statewide McAllen; a nd Mike Fine (collec tively , Statewide). I n response , Statewide filed a

motion to ex tend the time for f iling their notice of appe al. B eca use Statewide pr ov ide d a

re a so na ble e xplanatio n f

or its late fi lin g, we grant th e e xten sio n o f t ime and ov e rr ule World Acce ss’s motion to di smiss. Se e Ho ne v . Hana fin , 104 S.W .3d 884, 887 (Tex. 2003); Verburgt v. Dorne r , 959 S.W .2d 615, 616-17 (Te x . 1997).

The pa rties have als o filed a joint motion to st ay the proc eeding s until October 17, 2005. They inform us that the stay is sought for

the purpose of

enablingthe par

ties to neg otiate and2

settle the ca se. The motion is g rante d. The a ppeal is abated until October 17, 2005. I f the matter has not bee n set t l ed , World Acce ss’s brief sha ll be filed with this Court on or before October 31, 2005.

Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces B . A. Smith and Pury ear Filed: September

12, 2005
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 20, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-333 Lower Tribunal No. F90-1543

________________ 

### Lazaro Bonard, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge. Lazaro Bonard, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0341

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL RICHARD BONKO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2022

01/03/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0341
# Daniel Patrick Moynihan: A Featured Biography

**

----

Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York left college teaching to address a larger public audience as an elected official. Following a varied career as a social scientist, presidential aide, and ambassador, Moynihan came to the Senate in 1976 and served 24 years. A skilled legislator, he excelled at both floor debate and committee negotiation. The New York Democrat promoted policies to aid families and to provide stricter child support enforcement. He worked closely with Republican senator Robert Dole to author legislation to stabilize Social Security. He also became a vocal critic of Cold War-era military buildup and criticized the Reagan administration’s support for the Nicaraguan Contras. As chair of the Finance Committee in the 1990s, Moynihan criticized the Clinton administration’s proposal to expand health care and voted against welfare reform. In his later Senate years, Moynihan battled government secrecy and was instrumental in opening up thousands of previously classified files, among them the FBI’s “Venona” files regarding Soviet espionage. Moynihan retired in 2001.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before DEERWESTER , ATTANASIO , and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Eric J

. ALAMOROSARIO Hospital Corpsman First Class (E

- 6 ), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202200124

_________________________

Decided: 13 October 2022 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge : K imberly . J. Kelly
Sentence adjudged 17 February 2022 by a special court

- martial convened at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida , consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for sixty days , and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Captain Kimberly D. Hinson , JAGC, USN

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________United States v. Alamorosario , NMCCA No. 202200124 Opinion of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant ’s substantial rights occurred. 1 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

S. TAYLOR JOHNSTON Acting Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4713 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to exempt school-based enterprises 

from nutrition standards. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2014 

Mr. WOMACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to exempt schoolbased enterprises from nutrition standards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jumpstarting Occupa5 tional-learning and Entrepreneurship Act’’ or the ‘‘JOE 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF SCHOOL-BASED ENTERPRISES 

8 FROM NUTRITION STANDARDS. 

9 Section 10(b)(1) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 

10 (42 U.S.C. 1779(b)(1)) is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4713 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (C)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause 

3 (i); 

4 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

5 clause (ii)(IV) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

6 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(iii) exempt from such nutrition 

8 standards school-based enterprises man9 aged as part of a school’s curriculum.’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(E) SCHOOL-BASED ENTERPRISE DE13 FINED.—For purposes of this subsection, the 

14 term ‘school-based enterprise’ means an entre15 preneurial operation in a school setting that— 

16 ‘‘(i) provides goods or services to meet 

17 the needs of the market; 

18 ‘‘(ii) is managed and operated by stu19 dents enrolled in the school as a hands-on 

20 learning laboratory; 

21 ‘‘(iii) provides realistic and practical 

22 learning experiences that reinforce class23 room instruction; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4713 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) may sell to consumers through a 

2 permanent location, a mobile kiosk, or 

3 through Internet marketing; and 

4 ‘‘(v) may sell products such as food 

5 and beverage items, or provide services 

6 such as event catering.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11748]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12159 and <greek-i>12160]


Tennessee Disaster Number TN-00039

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1909-DR), dated 05/04/
2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Straight-line Winds, and 
Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 04/30/2010 and continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/08/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/06/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/04/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Tennessee, dated 05/04/2010 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Chester, 
Clay, Dekalb, Hardin, Jackson, Lauderdale, Lawrence, Lewis, Macon, 
Robertson, Smith, Stewart, Trousdale, Wayne, Wilson.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Tennessee: Overton, Pickett, Putnam, Warren, White.
    Alabama: Lauderdale.
    Kentucky: Calloway, Clinton, Cumberland, Logan, Monroe, Trigg.
    Mississippi: Tishomingo.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-11748 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

                             CityFed Financial Corp.
              Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss



<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                                NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                         ------------------------------
                                                             2004              2003
                                                         ------------      ------------
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>
Computation of Loss Per Share:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding       28,716,134        18,716,134

Loss applicable to common stock: (1)

   From continuing operations                            $ (6,666,000)     $ (6,357,000)
   From discontinued operations                                    --            11,000
                                                         ------------      ------------

   Net loss                                              $ (6,666,000)     $ (6,346,000)
                                                         ============      ============

 Basic and diluted loss per common share:

   From continuing operations                            $      (0.23)     $      (0.34)
   From discontinues operations                                 (0.00)            (0.00)
   Net loss                                              $      (0.23)     $      (0.34)
                                                         ============      ============
</TABLE>





______________
(1)  Losses applicable to Common Stock includes unpaid preferred stock dividends
for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 in the amount of
$6,835,000 and $6,475,000 respectively.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


(MCGLADREY & PULLEN LETTERHEAD)



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-45134) of our report, dated January 24, 2003 on the
consolidated balance sheet of Chester Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and
2001 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity,
comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002.


Springfield, Illinois
March 26, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Yahoo! Inc. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Marissa A. Mayer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ken Goldman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her or his knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ MARISSA A. MAYER
|Name:                |  | Marissa A. Mayer       
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Dated:               |  | September 19, 2014     
|                    
|/s/ KEN GOLDMAN     
|Name:                |  | Ken Goldman            
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Dated:               |  | September 19, 2014     

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2476

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 in order to prohibit any regulatory impediments to completely and accurately fulfilling the sufficiency

of support mandates of the national statutory policy of universal service,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 27, 2000

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 in order to

prohibit any regulatory impediments to completely and

accurately fulfilling the sufficiency of support mandates

of the national statutory policy of universal service, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Universal Service Sup5 port Act’’.
2

S 2476 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 254 of the Communica3 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is amended by adding

4 at the end thereof the following:

5 ‘‘(l) REMOVAL OF THE INTERIM CAP ON THE SIZE

6 OF THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND.—After the date of

7 enactment of the Universal Service Support Act, the Com8 mission may not enforce section 36.601(c) of its regula9 tions (47 C.F.R. 36.601(c)), nor promulgate a rule or reg10 ulation that is substantially the same as or similar in ef11 fect to that section.

12 ‘‘(m) REMOVAL OF UNIVERSAL SERVICE CAPS ON

13 INDIVIDUAL CARRIERS.—After the date of enactment of

14 the Universal Service Support Act, the Commission may

15 not—

16 ‘‘(1) enforce individual caps imposed on carriers

17 by Commission orders entered in connection with re18 quests, received before the date of enactment of that

19 Act, for study area waivers; or

20 ‘‘(2) impose any new cap that would limit the

21 per-loop support calculated under section 36.631 of

22 its regulations (47 C.F.R. 36.631).

23 ‘‘(n) PER-LOOP SUPPORT CALCULATION.— In calcu24 lating per-loop support, the Commission shall comply with

25 section 36.631 of its regulations (47 C.F.R. 36.631) as
3

S 2476 IS

1 that section was in effect on the date of the enactment

2 of the Universal Service Support Act.’’.

3 (b) HIGH COST LOOP SUPPORT CALCULATION.—

4 The Federal Communications Commission shall—

5 (1) calculate that portion of the high cost sup6 port mechanism attributable to loops that have costs

7 that are in excess of 115 percent of the nationwide

8 average under section 36.631 of the Commission’s

9 regulations (47 C.F.R. 36.631); and

10 (2) calculate the nationwide average for such

11 purposes under sections 36.621 and 36.622 of those

12 regulations (47 C.F.R. 36.621 and 36.622) as they

13 were in effect on the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT B 5

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1662-6 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 17:03:55 Page 1

of 29
EXHIBIT B 9

Case: 19-30088 Doc# 1662-10 Filed: 04/24/19 Entered: 04/24/19 17:03:55 Page 1

of 25
v150341_10-65 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.65
#### In the Matter of the Application of Mary Augusta Requa, Appellant, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
--DRAFT ONLY--


RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS




OF




ZENDEX HOLDINGS INC.













The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held this 27th day of May, 2016

 

WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to effectuate a new Board of Directors of the Company; 




NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue and pursuant to NRS 78.320, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that we have elected: 




Wei Chi Lim as Director 




The Above qualified Director, having been nominated, has accepted his position as DIRECTOR of the Company. 




Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records. 










Dated: 27th, May, 2016










/s/ Wei Chi Lim

Wei Chi Lim, 

on behalf of the Majority Shareholders