alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[File No. 6158.]

#### L. R. BAIRD, as Receiver of the Flasher State Bank of Flasher, North Dakota, Appellant, v. ROBERT T. GRAY, as Sheriff of Morton County, North Dakota, Respondent.

(249 N. W. 718.)

Opinion filed July 17, 1933.

*641
      *George F. Shafer,*for appellant.

*G. F. Eelsch,*for respondent.

*Ooventy & Thompson,*amicus curiae.

Per Curiam :

The only issue argued by the parties was the scope and effect of the law involved in the case of State ex rel. Cleveringa v. Klein, etc. ante, 514, 249 N. W. 118. Upon the authority of that case the judgment is reversed.

Nuessle, Ch. J., and ChristiaNSON, Birdzell and Buree, JJ., concur.
|                               |   |                                                       |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |                                                       |   |
| Date:       August 4,    2008 | By:    | /s/      Fred Abdula                                       |   |
|                               |   | Fred      Abdula                                           |   |
|                               |   | Chairman      of the Board of      Directors and President |   |
|                               |   |                                                       |   |

|                               |   |                              |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                               |   |                              |   |
| Date:       August 4,    2008 | By:    | /s/      Thomas      M. Nemeth    |   |
|                               |   | Thomas      M. Nemeth             |   |
|                               |   | Vice      President and Treasurer |   |
|                               |   |                              |   |
II

Calendar No. 757

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2499

[Report No. 106–381]

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric

project in the State of Pennsylvania.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 3, 2000

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

AUGUST 25, 2000

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 26, 2000, by Mr.

MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of a hydroelectric project in the State of Pennsylvania.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE AND REINSTATE4 MENT OF LICENSE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

6 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16
2

S 2499 RS

1 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En2 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 7041, the

3 Commission shall, at the request of the licensee for the

4 project, extend the period required for commencement of

5 construction of the project until December 31, 2001.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) takes effect

7 on the expiration of the period required for commencement

8 of construction of the project described in subsection (a).

9 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the

10 license for the project described in subsection (a) has ex11 pired before the date of enactment of this Act, the Com12 mission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date

13 of its expiration and extend the time required for com14 mencement of construction as provided in subsection (a).

Calendar No. 757

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2499

[Report No. 106–381]

A BILL

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project in the State

of Pennsylvania.

AUGUST 25, 2000

Reported without amendment
v150341_10-59 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.59
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund IV (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |  |  |                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Daniel Stephenson          
|                      |  |  |  | Daniel Stephenson, General Partner
|                      |  |  |  | Rancon Realty Fund IV
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50193 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JAIME ANTONIO JUAREZ

- PEREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 1878

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jaime Antonio Juarez

- Perez appeals the 46

- month within

- guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea convicti on for illegal reentry after having been previously deported . He argues that his indictment did not allege that he had a prior conviction and that, ther efore, his sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) violates his due process rights by exceeding the two

- year statutory maximum provided by § 1326(a). He concedes that this argument is foreclosed

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 17, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50193 Document: 00514799354 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/17/2019No. 18

- 50193

2 by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). Howev er, he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review because, he argues, subsequent Supreme Court decisions indicate that the Court may reconsider this issue. In Almendarez

- Torres , 523 U.S. at 239

- 47, the Supreme Court held that, for purpo ses of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must be alleged in the indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions did not overrule Almendarez

- Torres

. See, e.g., United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014) (considering the effect of Alleyne v. United States , 570 U.S. 99 (2013)); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007) (considering the effect of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000)). Thus, Juarez

- Perez ’s argument is foreclosed, and summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s unopposed motion for summar y affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 18-50193 Document: 00514799354 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/17/2019
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief executive officer of MacroChem Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1)   the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
          31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
          "FORM 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                        /S/  ROBERT J. DELUCCIA
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert J. DeLuccia
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:    MAY 13, 2005
          ------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MacroChem Corporation and will be retained by MacroChem Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       27
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended  September 30, 2002 (the "Report") by Libertry  Housing
Partners  Limited  Partnership (the  "Company"),  the undersigned,  as the Chief
Financial  Officer of the  general  partner  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

o        the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o        the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                          /s/ Wilma Brooks
                                          Name: Wilma Brooks
                                          Title:   Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11824]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation 
may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The 
majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an 
individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a 
notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of 
the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: 
http://www.nsf.gov. This information may also be requested by 
telephoning, 703/292-8182.

    Dated: May 13, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-11824 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



                We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-11759, 333-32785, 333-58999, 333-86383, 333-44784,
333-72636, 333-72644, and 333-73430) pertaining to the 1993 Amended Incentive
Stock Plan, the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1996 Director Option
Plan, the 2001 Incentive Stock Plan, and The Althexis Company, Inc. 1999 Stock
Option Plan and (Form S-3 Nos. 333-73890 and 333-55318) and related
Prospectuses, of our report dated February 3, 2003, except for Note 1 and the
last paragraph of Note 10, as to which the date is March 20, 2003, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Essential Therapeutics, Inc.
(formerly Microcide Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2003
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Beverly National Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), we, Donat A. Fournier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael O. Gilles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Donat A. Fournier  
|    |  | Donat A. Fournier      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    | 
|    |  | November 7, 2006       
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Michael O. Gilles  
|    |  | Michael O. Gilles      
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    | 
|    |  | November 10, 2006      

The foregoing certificate is furnished solely for purposes of complying with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any of the Companys previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the Companys future filings, including this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.
EXHIBIT (10)G

Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers

On November 30, 2006, the Compensation Committee set the 2007 annual base
salaries for the following 2007 named executive officers of FNB Corporation,
effective January 1, 2007.

A comparison of 2007 and 2006 base salaries for these named executive
officers follows:


Name                   Title                                  Base Salary
                                                            2006       2007

William P. Heath, Jr.  President and Chief Executive      $273,000   $286,650
                       Officer
Daniel A. Becker       Executive Vice President and       $151,720   $151,720
                       Chief Financial Officer
Gregory W. Feldmann    Chief Operating Officer, Market    $170,000   $187,008
                       President (Roanoke Valley), and
                       Director of Wealth Management
David W. DeHart        Market President (New River        $144,000   $149,760
                       Valley) and Director of
                       Commercial Banking
Keith J. Houghton      Executive Vice President and       $140,600   $154,668
                       Chief Risk Officer
William B. Littreal    Executive Vice President (1)          --      $150,000


(1) On January 29, 2007, the Corporation announced that Mr. William B.
Littreal was hired as Executive Vice President.  Mr. Littreal will assume the
additional role of Chief Financial Officer upon Mr. Daniel A. Becker's
retirement in March 2007.
#### David McClure, Respondent, *v.*Pennsylvania Tunnel and Terminal Railroad Company, Appellant.

Appeal from an order granting the plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a referee to hear and determine the issues.

Per Curiam:

We think, upon the record presented, that a long account is not involved which justifies a reference to hear and determine the *912action, against the opposition of the defendant. The order appealed from, therefore, should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motipn denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Ingra-ham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs
# States in the Senate | Arkansas Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

 1. Vacancy from July 11, 1861, to June 22, 1868, because of Civil War. Elected by legislature, to fill vacancy in term beginning March 4, 1865.

 2. Elected January 28, 1913 for term beginning March 4, 1913. Took oath March 10, 1913. Served as governor until March 8, 1913.

 3. Vacancy from July 15 to November 14, 1937. Elected October 18, 1937 to complete term ending January 3, 1943. Served in House during interim.

 4. Vacancy from July 11, 1861, to June 23, 1868, because of Civil War. By legislature, to fill vacancy in term beginning March 4, 1867.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC,

Appellant

v.

FANDUEL, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2024-1651

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-

01306.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of WinView IP Holdings LLC’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) and the parties’ agreement as to the allocation of costs,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Case: 24-1651 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 08/19/2024
2 WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC v. FANDUEL, INC.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

August 19, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 19, 2024

Case: 24-1651 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 08/19/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,233
<PP&E>                                          21,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,662)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          851,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,755,618
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,426,924)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,418
<SALES>                                         23,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,465
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,481,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,479,322)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,479,322)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,479,322)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>