alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2664 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2664

To suspend temporarily the duty on machines used in the manufacture of 
                        digital versatile discs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2000

 Mr. Coverdell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on machines used in the manufacture of 
                        digital versatile discs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new superior heading and subheading:

      

``    ............  Liquid crystal
                     devices not
                     constituting
                     articles
                     provided for
                     more
                     specifically in
                     other headings,
                     lasers, other
                     laser diodes,
                     other optical
                     appliances, and
                     instruments,
                     not specified
                     or included
                     elsewhere in
                     chapter 90
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     9013.80.90):
      9902.84.22      In-line         Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                       mastering                                                             31/2003          ''
                       system                                                                                  .
                       machines for
                       use in the
                       manufacture
                       of digital
                       versatile
                       discs (DVDs),
                       whether
                       imported
                       separately or
                       as an
                       entirety.....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Josephine M. Weiss, Appellant, v. Daisey B. Cooper, Impleaded with Herbert D. Hoffnagle, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the annual report of ICTS International, N.V. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Avraham Dan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

By: /s/ Avraham Dan
     --------------------------------------
     Avraham Dan, Managing Director and CFO

Dated: June 30, 2008
Case: 19-30088    Doc# 1652    Filed: 04/24/19    Entered: 04/24/19 15:20:20    Page 1 of1
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4697 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise the definition 

of a well-known seasoned issuer to reduce the worldwide market value 

threshold under the definition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2014 

Mr. MCCARTHY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to revise 

the definition of a well-known seasoned issuer to reduce 

the worldwide market value threshold under the definition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small-Cap Access to 

5 Capital Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF WELL-KNOWN SEASONED ISSUER. 

7 Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4697 IH

1 shall revise its definition of a well-known seasoned issuer 

2 under section 230.405 of title 17, Code of Federal Regula3 tions, to reduce the dollar amount under paragraph 

4 (1)(i)(A) of such definition (relating to worldwide market 

5 value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity 

6 held by non-affiliates) from $700 million to $250 million 

7 and to prohibit an emerging growth company from quali8 fying as a well-known seasoned issuer. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit (10)G


Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers

On December 22, 2005, the Independent Directors set the 2006 annual base
salaries for the following 2006 and 2005 named executive officers of FNB
Corporation, effective January 1, 2006.

A comparison of 2006 and 2005 base salaries for named executive officers
follows:


Name                   Title                                  Base Salary
                                                            2005       2006

William P. Heath, Jr.  President and Chief Executive      $248,000   $273,000
                       Officer
Daniel A. Becker       Executive Vice President and       $122,720   $151,720
                       Chief Financial Officer
Gregory W. Feldmann    Executive Vice President and       $130,500   $151,500
                       Director of Corporate Banking/
                       Alternate Business Lines
Keith J. Houghton      Executive Vice President and       $119,600   $140,600
                       Chief Risk Officer
Duane E. Mink          Executive Vice President and       $135,000   $140,400
                       General Counsel
D.W. Shilling          Executive Vice President           $130,000   $135,200
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.




	
Exhibit 10.2










FIRST AMENDMENT TO

EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.

MANAGEMENT BONUS PLAN





            WHEREAS, ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. Management Bonus Plan,
as amended and restated through February 20, 2007 (the “Plan”); and


            WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;


            NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be and hereby is amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2009:


            1.         The second sentence of Section 4 of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted
therefor:


            “A Participant’s target bonus amount for a Fiscal Year shall be determined as set forth below unless a different base salary percentage (which may not exceed
100%) is determined by the Committee with respect to a Participant prior to commencement of a Fiscal Year:









	
Position with the Company or Subsidiary          

	
   

	
Target Bonus Amount


	
Chief Executive Officer

		
60% of base salary for the Fiscal Year


	
Chief Operating Officer

		
45% of base salary for the Fiscal Year


	
Chief Financial Officer

		
40% of base salary for the Fiscal Year


	
Vice President

		
40% of base salary for the Fiscal Year


	
Staff Vice President

		
30% of base salary for the Fiscal Year


	
Senior Director

		
25% of base salary for the Fiscal Year


	
Director

		
20% of base salary for the Fiscal Year


	
Any other Participant

		
Percentage (not to exceed 100%) of base salary for the Fiscal Year designated by the Committee in connection with the designation of such individual as a Participant for the Fiscal Year.”










            2.         As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.





            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused these presents to be executed this 14th day of May, 2009.





                                                                       
EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.











                                                                       
By:       /s/ James B. Ream                            


                                                                       
Name: James B. Ream                                 


                                                                       
Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

.

R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10875

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS EULALIO RUIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:97-CR-11-2-A

- - - - - - - - - - May 13, 1998 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

PER CURIAM: 1

Luis Eulalio Ruiz appeals the sentence he received on his

guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to

distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine. We have reviewed

the record de novo and find that Ruiz’s prior convictions were not

part of a single common schem e or plan and were not consolidated

for trial or sentencing and thus were not related and therefore

counted separately for the career offender enhancement provision.

See United States v. Garcia

, 962 F.2d 479, 482-83 (5th Cir. 1992).We find no clear error in the district adopting the findings

of the presentence report rega rding the amount of drugs

attributable to Ruiz over his unsworn assertion that he did not

negotiate or agree to the sale of an additional four kilograms of

cocaine. S ee United States v. Puig-Infante

, 19 F.3d 929, 943 (5th

Cir. 1994) ( citing Fed. R. Crim. P. 32).

We have reviewed for plain error Rui z’s argument raised for

the first time on appeal that the district court erred, under

United States v. Mergerson

, 4 F.3d 337 , 346 (5th Cir. 1993), in

considering negotiated-for sales of cocaine in determining the

amount of drugs attributable for the purposes of inv oking the

statuto ry penalty of § 841(b)(1)(A). S ee United States v.

Rodriguez

, 15 F.3d 408, 414-15 (5th Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Crim. P.

52(b). Because the district court sentenced Ruiz according to the

sentencing guidelines, the court did not err in considering the

negotiated-for amounts o f cocaine for determining the guideline

sentence. See Mergerson , 4 F.3d at 345-46.

Ruiz’s motion to supplement the record with evidence not

presented to the district court is denied. S ee Fed. R. App. P.

10(e).

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
### **Exhibit 31.2**

###  

**PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert B. Wagner,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof XETA Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and

 

                        presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated:  March 5, 2008

 
| /s/ Robert B. Wagner    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert B. Wagner        |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,764
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,089
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    106,975
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,235
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,057
<LOANS>                                        320,875
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 492,275
<DEPOSITS>                                     453,861
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,955
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,115
<LONG-TERM>                                        210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,581
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 492,275
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,645
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,983
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   207
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,835
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,858
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,920
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,915
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,916
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,977
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.54
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,244
<LOANS-PAST>                                       388
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,696
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      328
<RECOVERIES>                                       133
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,501
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,501
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIALS IN 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      12,868,496
<SECURITIES>                                27,181,222
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,783,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (283,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    303,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,884,496
<PP&E>                                       3,678,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                 669,118
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,150,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,413,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,908
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,722,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,150,535
<SALES>                                     13,204,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,204,451
<CGS>                                        5,518,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,518,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,887,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             953,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,248,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    95,331
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,343,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,343,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.88)
        

</TABLE>
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made as of this 26 day of May, 2016, by and between ERBA Diagnostics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Mohan Gopalkrishnan (the “Executive”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated effective as of June 1, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement in the manner set forth in this Amendment.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby mutually agree as follows:

 

1.      Term. The term of the Employment Agreement shall be extended by seven (7) months. Accordingly, Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“The Executive’s employment under this Agreement shall be for a term commencing on the Effective Date and expiring on December 31, 2016 (the “Term”).” 

 

2.     Base Salary. The annual base salary shall, effective as of June 1, 2016, be increased from $230,000 to $300,000. Accordingly, the first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of June 1, 2016, to delete the dollar amount of “$230,000” and to replace it with the dollar amount of “$300,000”.

 

3.     Miscellaneous. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida, without regard to its conflicts of law principles. Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain unaffected and in full force and effect.

 

[Signature page follows]

 


 

 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Company and the Executive has duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above set forth.

 

	
COMPANY:    
	
EXECUTIVE:

	
 
	
 

	
ERBA Diagnostics, Inc., 
	
 

	
a Delaware corporation 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
By: /s/ Suresh Vazirani             
	
/s/ Mohan Gopalkrishnan     

	
       Suresh Vazirani,
	
Mohan Gopalkrishnan

	
       Executive Chairman
#### Amy G. Rochester, Respondent, v. Helene Clarke Chase, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAVID MILLER
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3771

[ September 6, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Elizabeth Anne

Scherer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 76

- 004041CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jo seph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Rogers v. State , 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1493 (Fla. 4th DCA July 5, 2017); Rooks v. State

, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1573 (Fla. 3d DCA July 12, 2017); Currie v. State, 219 So. 3d 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

G ERBER
, C.J., G ROSS and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Dana J. Bugbee v. William I. Overstreet, as Trustee, etc.

(No. 2.)

Motion granted and appellant’s time to file points extended to September 15, 1911. Order to be settled on notice.