alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ROYAL GENE JONES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-30173

D.C. No. 4:06-cr-00089-CCL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2014** 

Before: ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Royal Gene Jones appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

to modify his conditions of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

FEB 26 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Jones argues that the district court erred by failing to consider the goals of

18 U.S.C. § 3624(c) when it denied his motion seeking permission to reside in

Wyoming while on supervised release, which the district court construed as a

motion for transfer of jurisdiction over his supervised release under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3605. This argument is unpersuasive. By its own terms, section 3624(c) applies

to prerelease custody, not supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(1). 

Moreover, because the District of Wyoming did not accept jurisdiction over Jones,

the district court properly concluded that he did not satisfy the statutory

requirements of section 3605. See United States v. Ohler, 22 F.3d 857, 858-59 (9th

Cir. 1994). 

AFFIRMED.

2 13-30173
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0302. UNITED GAMING, LLC v. NIRVANA RASHED, INC.

This appeal was docketed on September 4, 2024, making the appellant’s brief

containing an enumerations of error due on September 24, 2024. See Court of

Appeals Rule 23 (a). The appellant has failed to file a brief to date. Accordingly, the

appeal is DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e ,

Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 04, 2024

10/04/2024
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-4439
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY BERNARD GREENE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-01-33) Submitted: May 25, 2005 Decided: June 8, 2005 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Grant Belser, BELSER & PARKE, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Thomas Richard Ascik, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rodney Bernard Greene appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a six-month custodial sentence. Greene has been discharged from federal custody, his sentence did not include a term of supervised release, and there are no continuing collateral consequences from the district court’s revocation order and imposition of sentence. We therefore dismiss Greene’s appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 10 (1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. JOSE ABEL CABRERA

- SOMOSA , Petitioner

. N o . 1 CA

- CR 17

- 0127 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2008

- 006195

- 001 The Honorable Michael D. Gordon , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent
Jose Abel Cabrera

- Somosa , San Luis Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones, Judge Jon W. Thompson, and Judge Jennifer M. Perkins delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 1-4-2018STATE v. CABRERA

- SOMOSA Decision of the Court

2 P E R C U R I A M : ¶1 Petitioner Jose Cabrera

- Somosa seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petitio n for post

- conviction relief , filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1

. This is the petitioner’s third successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 576

- 77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the petition. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not shown any abuse of discretion. ¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny re lief.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge,
that the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


Dated: March 28, 2003                   /s/ David Sitt
                                        --------------------------------
                                        David Sitt
                                        Co-Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 27, 2003                   /s/ Roberto Sonabend
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Roberto Sonabend
                                        Co-Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 27, 2003                   /s/ James Green
                                        --------------------------------
                                        James Green
                                        Chief Operating Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Princeton Video Image, Inc. and will be retained by Princeton
Video Image, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Louise P. Newcomb, Appellant, v. Gertrude M. Jones, Individually and as Executrix, etc., of *W.*Martin Jones, Deceased, and Gertrude Minnie Jones, Respondents, Impleaded with Abram Jones and Others.

Order reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to renew upon payment of the costs herein provided for and the ten dollars costs of former motion.

All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented.
#### CELIA PAUL, Respondent, v. L. E. PATZER, Appellant.

(226 N. W. 495.)

Opinion filed June 5, 1929.

Rehearing denied August 13, 1929.

*Divet, Shure, Murphy & Thorp,*for appellánt.

*Crawford, Cain & Burneii,*for ‘respondent.

CheistiaNSON, J.

This is a companion case to Galloway v. Patzer, post, 443, 226 N. W. 491. The plaintiff in this case was riding in de*443•fendant’s automobile at tbe time the accident occurred in wbicb the plaintiff in Galloway v. Patzer, supra, was injured; and she brought this action to recover damages for injuries which she claims to have sustained. The pleadings are in all material aspects identical; and precisely the same proceedings were had in this case as in the other case. The application to vacate the default judgment in this case is predicated upon affidavits that are identical with those presented in the other case, and the affidavit in opposition to such application is also identical. The cases were submitted together in the trial court and also in this court. The trial court entered the same order and filed the same memorandum opinion in this case as in the other. The facts being identical, it follows that the decision here must be the same as in Galloway v. Patzer. Order affirmed.

Bueeb, Gh. J., and Biedzell, Nuessle, and Buee, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                          <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 24483
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      882971
<PP&E>                                                767025
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        882971 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 780670
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                4655
<OTHER-SE>                                            336381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          882971
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      40,020
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         31,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      20,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (12,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (12,671)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
                                                          







</TABLE>
v150341_10-55 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.56
II

Calendar No. 795

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2439

[Report No. 106–405]

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the construction of the

Southeastern Alaska Intertie system, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 13, 2000

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

SEPTEMBER 11, 2000

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the construction

of the Southeastern Alaska Intertie system, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That there is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the

4 Secretary of Energy such sums as may be necessary to

5 assist in the construction of the Southeastern Alaska
2

S 2439 RS

1 Intertie system as generally identified in Report #97–01

2 of the Southeast Conference. Nothing in this Act shall be

3 construed to limit or waive any otherwise applicable State

4 or Federal law, including, but not limited to environmental

5 laws, relating to funding for or construction of the system.

Calendar No. 795

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2439

[Report No. 106–405]

A BILL

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the

construction of the Southeastern Alaska Intertiesystem, and for other purposes.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2000

Reported without amendment
# States in the Senate | Oregon

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Ron Wyden (D)***Hometown: Portland*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Jeff Merkley (D)***Hometown: Portland*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Oregon became the 33rd state to join the Union on February 14, 1859. Oregon’s first two senators, Joseph Lane and Delazon Smith, took office on that day. Oregon’s longest-serving senators include Charles McNary (1917–1944) and Wayne Morse (1945–1969). Among those who rose to leadership positions is Charles McNary, who served as Republican whip and floor leader. In 1996 Ron Wyden won the first Senate election conducted by mail-in ballot.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
TLC LASER EYE CENTERS INC.

                           TLC Laser Eye Centers Inc.
                            Form 10-K - Exhibit 23.1
                               Consent of Auditors

                  Consent of Independent Chartered Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No.333-8162) of TLC Laser Eye Centers Inc. of our report dated July 7,
2000, on the Consolidated Financial Statements of TLC Laser Eye Centers Inc. as
at May 31, 2000 and 1999 and for each of the years in the three (3) year period
ended May 31, 2000 prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, and our report dated July 7, 2000 on the
consolidated financial statements of TLC Laser Eye Centers Inc. as at May 31,
2000 and 1999 for each of the years in the three (3) year period ended May 31,
2000 prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
Canada included in the 2000 Annual Report (Form 10-K) of TLC Laser Eye Centers
Inc.


Toronto, Canada                          /s/ Ernst & Young
July 7, 2000                             Chartered Accountants
# Bill Clinton Cabinet Nominations

**

----

Article II, section 2 of the *Constitution* gives the Senate responsibility for considering and confirming the president's executive and judicial nominations.

**Footnote:**

1. Named acting secretary of veterans affairs on Jul 25, 2000.

**Key:**

R- Recess Appointment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's balance sheet, statement of operations, statement of stockholder's
equity and statement of cash flows and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000743884
<NAME>                                      MacroChem Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                1
<CURRENCY>                                  U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                Sep-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                                      6,169,583
<SECURITIES>                                15,927,391
<RECEIVABLES>                               187,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,460,531
<PP&E>                                      1,085,291
<DEPRECIATION>                              687,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,174,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       749,046
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    222,752
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,702,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,174,572
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,039,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,039,865)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3439247
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3439247
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
Global Med Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-28155, No. 333-39193, No. 333-45031, No. 333-69851, No. 333-60672, No. 333-60674, and No. 333-115686) on Form S-8 and No. 333-131388 on Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form SB-2 on Form S-3 of Global Med Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary, of our report dated March 19, 2009 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Global Med Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.



|/s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Denver, Colorado
March 19, 2009
|-------------------------------

---
The Capitol: Art and Architecture

The following books describe the art in and architecture of the U.S. Capitol. 

Ahrens, Kent. “Nineteenth Century History Painting and the United States Capitol.” Records of 

the Columbia Historical Society of Washington, D.C., the Fiftieth Volume. Washington, D.C.: 

Columbia Historical Society, 1980. 

Allen, William C. The Dome of the United States Capitol: An Architectural History. 

Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2002. 

Allen, William C. A History of the United States Capitol: A Chronicle of Design, Construction, 

and Politics. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2001. 

Architect of the Capitol. Art in the United States Capitol. Washington, D.C.: Government 

Printing Office, 1976. 

Architect of the Capitol. The United States Capitol: A Brief Architectural History. Washington, 

D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1990. 

Cosentino, Andrew J., and Henry H. Glassie. The Capital Image: Painters in Washington, 1800–

1915. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1983. 

Kennon, Donald R. The United States Capitol: Designing and Decorating a National Icon.

Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2000. 

Kloss, William and Diane K. Skvarla. United States Senate Catalogue of Fine Art. Washington, 

D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2002. 

McMahan, Virgil E. The Artists of Washington, D.C., 1796–1996. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: The 

Artists of Washington, D.C., 1995. 

Maroon, Fred J. and Suzy Maroon. The United States Capitol. New York: Stewart, Tabori, and 

Chang, 1993. 

Murdock, Myrtle Cheney. Constantino Brumidi: Michelangelo of the United States Capitol. 

Washington, D.C.: Monumental, 1950. 

Scott, Pamela. Temple of Liberty: Building the Capitol for a New Nation. New York: Oxford 

University Press, 1995. 

U.S. Library of Congress. An Album of American Battle Art, 1755–1918. Washington, D.C.: 

Government Printing Office, 1947. Reprint, New York: Da Capo, 1972. 
Viles, Philip H. Jr. National Statuary Hall: Guidebook for a Walking Tour, 2nd ed. Tulsa, OK: 

Philip H. Viles, 1997. 

White, George M. Under the Capitol Dome. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Architects 

Press, 1997. 

Wolanin, Barbara A., comp. Constantino Brumidi: Artist of the Capitol. Washington, D.C.: 

Government Printing Office, 1998.