T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp el l ant . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R YA N F R AN K B ON NE AU , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 30075 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 0 - c r - 0 0 4 0 2 - MO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon M i c ha e l W . M os m a n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an d M cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R yan F ra nkB on neau appeal s f rom the 26 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for posse ss i on w i th i nt entt o d i stri bu t e a c ontr ol l e d s ubs t a nc e , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . § 841( a ) ( 1) a nd ( b) ( 1) ( D ) . W e ha ve



# FI LED DE C 22 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 30075 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm i n pa r ta nd va c a t e a nd r e m a nd in p a r t. T he gove rnm e ntc ont e nds tha tthi s appe a l s houl d be di s m i s s e d i n l i ghtof the appeal w ai ver s etforth i n B on nea’ s pl eaagre em ent . W e dec l i ne t o rea ch that is s u e , a n d in s te a d a f

f irm o n th e m e r its . Se e U n ite d S ta te s v . J

a c o b o C a s tillo , 496 F . 3d 947, 957 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( e n ba nc ) ( e nf or c e abl e appe a l w a i ve rdoe s not depri ve thi s C ou rtof j uri sdi ct i on ). B onne au c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc our te rr e d by de ny i ng B onne au’ s m ot i on to w ith d r a w h is g u ilty p le a . T h e d is tr ic t c o u r t d id n o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in de ny i ng B onne au’ s m ot i on be c aus e B onne au f a i l e d t o s how af

a i ra nd j us tr e a s on f o rw ith d r a w in g h is p le a . See F e d . R . C r im . P . 1 1 ( d ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ; U ni ted Stat es v. Sh ow al ter , 569 F . 3d 1150, 1154 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . B onne au a l s o c ont e nds tha tthe d is tr ic t c o u r t e rr e d b y d e n y in g h is m o tio n f o rs u b s titu te c o u n s e l. T o th e e x te n t th is c la im is n o t m o o t, th e r e c o r d s h o w s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t d id n o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g B o n n e au ’s m o tio n . See U ni ted Stat es v. Mendez- Sa nchez , 5 6 3 F .3 d 9 3 5 , 9 4 3 - 4 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . B on neau further c on t ends thatthe di stri cterre d w hen i trul ed thathe w as p erm an en t l y i n el i g i b l e t o recei v e fed eral b en efi t s u n d er 2 1 U . S . C . § 8 6 2 . B ecau se the di s tr i c tc our tpl a i nl y e rr e d i n m a ki ng thi s de t e rm i na t i on, a nd the gove rnm e nt11- 30075 3 doe s notobj e c tt o al i m i t e d r e m a nd, w e r e m and w i th i ns truc t i ons t o c orr e c tthe j udgm e ntt o de l e t e the i ne l i gi bi l i ty f i ndi ng. B o n n e au ’s m o tio n f

o rr e v ie w o f

r e le a s e p e n d in g ap p e a l is d e n ie d a s m o o t. A F F IR M E D i n p art; V A C A T E D an d R E M A N D E D i n p art.