alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of MacroChem Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)       Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
         30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
         "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                           /s/  Bernard R. Patriacca
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Bernard R. Patriacca
                           Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Dated:    November 8, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MacroChem Corporation and will be retained by MacroChem Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       28
<PAGE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 7, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D21-37; 3D21-38

Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-464 SP; 19-127 AP;

 13-466 SP; 19-128 AP 

________________

Doral Health Center, P.A., 

a/a/o Pedro Sanchez, and

 a/a/o Nancy Sanchez,

Appellants,

vs.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,

Appellee.

Appeals from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Diana 

Gonzalez-Whyte, Judge.

Patiño Law Firm, Richard Patiño and Ryan Peterson, for appellants. 

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Thomas L. Hunker and Sarah Hafeez 

(Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Vasquez v. State, 777 So. 2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2001) (“[T]he trial court may draw an adverse inference against a party in a 

civil action who invokes his privilege against self-incrimination.” (citing Baxter 

v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976))); Rollins Burdick Hunter of N.Y., Inc. v. 

Euroclassics Ltd., Inc., 502 So. 2d 959, 962 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (“A civil 

litigant’s fifth amendment right to avoid self-incrimination may be used as a 

shield but not a sword. This means that a plaintiff seeking affirmative relief 

in a civil action may not invoke the fifth amendment and refuse to comply 

with the defendant’s discovery requests, thereby thwarting the defendant’s 

defenses.” (citing City of St. Petersburg v. Houghton, 362 So. 2d 681, 683 

(Fla. 2d DCA 1978))); see also Campbell v. Riggs, 310 So. 3d 68, 70 (Fla. 

4th DCA 2021) (“[O]nce there is a motion for summary judgment that is 

supported by affidavit or other factual showing, the burden shifts to the 

opposing party to show by appropriate means that genuine and material 

issues do remain to be tried.” (quoting Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40, 42 (Fla. 

1966))); Raven v. Roosevelt REO US LLC, 278 So. 3d 245, 246 (Fla. 3d 

DCA 2019) (“Summary judgment is proper . . . where the moving party shows 

conclusively that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that it is 

entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” (citation omitted)).
SUBSIDIARIES

FIDELITY HOLDINGS, INC.

o     Major Acquisition Corp.

            o     Major Automotive Group, Inc.

                        o     Major Chevrolet, Inc.

                        o     Major Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle, Inc.

                        o     Major Dodge, Inc.

                        o     Major Subaru, Inc.

                        o     Major Kia, Inc.

            o     Major Automotive Realty Corp.

o     Major Automotive of New Jersey, Inc.

      o     Compass Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

o     Computer Business Sciences, Inc.

            o     IG2, Inc. (FL) [originally incorporated as Reynard Service
                  Bureau, Inc.]

            o     C.B.S. Computer Business Sciences Ltd. (Israel)

            o     786710 Ontario Ltd (Info Systems)

            o     CarsTV.com, Inc.

            o     IG2, Inc. (VA)

            o     Mid-Atlantic Telecommunications, Inc.

o     Premo-Plast, Inc.

            o     Maxflo, Inc. 80% (20% OWNED BY PDC, LLC)

o     Energy Plus, Inc.

o     Cryogenix, Inc.

o     Ever Safe, Inc.

o     Slack 2000, Inc.

o     Major Fleet & Leasing Corp.
217-/5

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 03-12-00808-CR OFFENSE: 22.02

Andre Demar Gipson v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Travis

Modified, and as

COA DISPOSITION: Modified, Affirmed TRIALCOURT: 331st District Court

DATE:2/12/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: D-l-DC-07-302550

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Andre Demar Gipson v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#: W1-IS

PRO SE

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: /)6 //f?/c%?/r

JUDGE: /h Ul<1IjtsJ*-*-^

Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
No. 1,446.

#### FRARY, Appellant, *v.*DWYER, Respondent.

*Appeal from District Court, Cascade County.*

(For former opinion, see ante, .page 414.)

April 16, 1902.

*Mr. F. A. Merrill,*for Appellant.

*Mr. -T. E. Brady,*for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Upon the stipulation of W. S. Frary and counsel for respondent, this appeal is dismissed, without, prejudice, however, to any right counsel for appellant may have in the premises.

Mr. Justice Pigott, having’ been of counsel during the pendency of tills cause in the district court, takes no part in this order.
Exhibit 11



ALFA CORPORATION

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



The following computations set forth the calculation of basic and diluted net income per common share and
common share equivalents for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002:



|                                                                                    |  | Three Months EndedMarch 31,
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                                                                                    |  | 2003                       
|Net income                                                                          |  | $                          
|                                                                                    |  |                            
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                                |  |                            
|                                                                                    |  |                            
|Net income per common shareBasic                                                   |  | $                          
|                                                                                    |  |                            
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                    |  | Three Months EndedMarch 31,
|                                                                                    |  | 2003                       
|Net income                                                                          |  | $                          
|                                                                                    |  |                            
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                                |  |                            
|Common share equivalents resulting from:                                            |  |                            
|Dilutive stock options                                                              |  |                            
|                                                                                    |  |                            
|Adjusted weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding |  |                            
|                                                                                    |  |                            
|Net income per common shareDiluted                                                 |  | $                          
|                                                                                    |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         690,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               833,034
<PP&E>                                         299,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                 225,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,458,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,760
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,001
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,280,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,458,210
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (2,887,802)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,599,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,599,298)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,599,298)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.26)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund IV (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                   |  |  |  |                                   
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel Stephenson             
|                   |  |  |  | Daniel Stephenson, General Partner
|                   |  |  |  | Rancon Realty Fund IV
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41834 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHRISTOPHER JOHN BERNAL Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-720-2 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Christopher John Bernal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Bernal has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-34205) pertaining to the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan and the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of SteriGenics International, Inc. of our report dated April
30, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of SteriGenics
International, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended March 31, 1999.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of SteriGenics
International, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects the information set forth herein.



                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



San Jose, California
June 29, 1999
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

h1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145665

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145665

COA: 306906

Oakland CC: 2007

- 216394

- FC

KEVIN DARNELL RAGLAND,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2012 order

of the Court of Appea ls is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 28, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 28, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0542. TONY W. STEPHENS v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CV289633
```

Exhibit 32.1

                                  **CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the
"Report") of Telemetrix Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2003, I, Michael J. Tracy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Executive and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 15, 2004

                                /s/ Michael J. Tracy
                             Name:  Michael J. Tracy
                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                   and Chief Financial Officer
                         (Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)
```
v150341_10-40 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.40
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Greg D. Forrest, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Greg D. Forrest     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Greg  D. Forrest         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | August 28, 2009     |

 

----
v150341_10-361 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.36.1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 10, 2021

No. 04-21-00098-CR

Isaac CARDENAS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR10269

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant 

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues 

to raise on appeal. Counsel certifies he has served copies of the brief and motion on 

appellant, and has informed appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief, and 

has explained to appellant the procedure for obtaining the record. See Nichols v. State, 954 

S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Counsel also provided appellant with a pro se motion 

for access to the appellate record.

Appellant may obtain a copy of the appellate record by filing a written request, not 

later than June 24, 2021, with the clerk of the trial court, Mary Angie Garcia, District 

Clerk, Paul Elizondo Tower, 101 W Nueva, Suite 217., San Antonio, TX 78205-3411, 210-

335-2113. If appellant files a written request for the record with the trial court clerk, Mary 

Angie Garcia is ORDERED to immediately send a copy of the record to appellant.

. 

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within forty-five days from the 

date of this order. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.  

If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than 

thirty days after appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. Alternatively, if appellant does not 
file a timely pro se brief, the State may file a brief in response to counsel’s brief no later 

than thirty days after the pro se brief is due. 

We further ORDER the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel to be HELD IN 

ABEYANCE pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-82 

(1988); Schulman v. State, 252 S.W.3d 403, 410-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). 

We further ORDER the Clerk of this Court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, his 

counsel, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of June, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          22,765
<SECURITIES>                                     2,622
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                       220
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,432
<PP&E>                                         151,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,165
<BONDS>                                         35,070
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,083
<SALES>                                         54,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,529
<CGS>                                           27,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,767
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,767
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93


</TABLE>