alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Mark O. Hatfield: A Featured Biography

**

----

First elected to the United States Senate in 1966, Mark O. Hatfield of Oregon legislated to the beat of his own drum during his three decades of Senate service. Senator Hatfield often placed conscience before partisanship and remained steadfast in his views, earning him both admiration and criticism from his colleagues. Shaped by his military service during World War II and his Christian faith, Hatfield never approved a military authorization bill, from Vietnam to the Persian Gulf War of 1991. In 1971 he co-sponsored an amendment calling for the withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Vietnam. Hatfield staunchly opposed Cold War defense spending and renounced capital punishment. Consistently working across the aisle, he built a rapport with Democratic senators Robert C. Byrd and Edward M. Kennedy, often co-sponsoring major legislation. He is best known for his role as chairman of the Appropriations Committee (1981-1987, 1995-1997), where in 1995 he cast the lone Republican “nay” vote on a GOP-supported Balanced Budget Amendment, which ultimately fell one vote short of passage.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0231. WILLIE MAYS v. THE STATE.

In 2015, Willie Mays pled guilty to theft by taking. In 2018, Mays appealed

from the trial court’s denials of his motion to set aside a void judgment and his

extraordinary motion for new trial. Both appeals were dismissed. See Case No.

A18A1715 (June 7, 2018); Case No. A18A1716 (June 7, 2018). In the meantime,

however, Mays filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal. On June 22, 2018, the trial

court dismissed his motion on the basis that the case was still pending on appeal and

that remittitur had not yet been returned.

1 Mays filed a direct appeal in Case No.

A19A0649. He also filed this application on November 30, 2018. We, however, lack

jurisdiction.

The denial of a motion for an out-of-time appeal is directly appealable when

the criminal conviction at issue has not been the subject of direct appeal. English v.

State, 307 Ga. App. 544, 545 n.4 (705 SE2d 667) (2010). Ordinarily, we will grant

an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is

subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule,

however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be

appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d), (j). Here, Mays filed his application 161 days

after the entry of the order he seeks to appeal.

1 Mays also filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which the trial court also

dismissed because remittitur had not yet been returned on his prior appeals. This

Court dismissed the direct appeal and application stemming from that order. See

Case No. A19A0650 (December 10, 2018); Case No. A19D0192 (December 10,

2018)

December 27, 2018
Additionally, this Court already docketed a direct appeal from the dismissal of

his motion of an out-of-time appeal inCase No. A19A0649. We dismissed the appeal

because Mays failed to file an appellate brief. See Case No. A19A0649 (December

19, 2018).

Accordingly, because Mays failed to file his application within 30 days after

the entry of the order he seeks to appeal, his application is hereby DISMISSED for

lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/27/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2561 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2561

            To reduce temporarily the duty on Vulkalent E/C.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2000

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To reduce temporarily the duty on Vulkalent E/C.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON VULKALENT E/C.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new subheading:

      

``    9902.38.30    A mixture of N-   Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     Phenyl-N-                                                               31/2003          ''
                     ((trichlorometh                                                                           .
                     yl)thio)-
                     Benzenesulfonam
                     ide; calcium
                     carbonate; and
                     mineral oil
                     (the foregoing
                     provided for in
                     subheading
                     3824.90.28)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 1,865.

#### STATE ex rel. DONOVAN, Attorney General, Relator, *v.*WADSWORTH, Treasurer, Respondent.

Original — Injunction.

Decided October 9, 1902.

*Mr. James Donovan, in pro. per.*

Per Curiam.'

— Relator’s application for an injunction herein is hereby denied.

(Mr. Justice Pigott, being disqualified, takes no part in making this order.)
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2470

To suspend for 3 years the duty on fenbuconazole.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 26, 2000

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend for 3 years the duty on fenbuconazole.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON

4 FENBUCONAZOLE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.86 alpha-[2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-

ethyl]-alpha-phenyl-1H1,2,4-triazole-1-

propanenitrile (CAS No.

114369–43–6) (provided for

in subheading 2933.90.06) .. Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.
2

•S 2470 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section shall apply with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20319 Conference Calendar

__________________ DONALD RANDLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SUPERIOR PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-95-0771

- - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * A complaint filed in forma pauperis can be dismissed sua sponte if the complaint is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Cay v. Estelle , 789 F.2d 318, 323 (5th Cir. 1986). A complaint is frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. Ancar v. Sara Plasma, Inc. , 964 F.2d 465, 468 (5th Cir. 1992). This court reviews the dismissal for an abuse of discretion. Id. "A claim for relief under section 1983 requires a showing of two elements: first, that the claimant has been deprived of aNo. 95-20319 -2- right `secured by the Constitution and laws' of the United States, and second, that the deprivation was conducted `under color of any statute . . . of any State.'" Frazier v. Board of Trustees of N.W. Miss. Regional Medical Ctr. , 765 F.2d 1278, 1283 (5th Cir. 1985) (quoting Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co. , 398 U.S. 144, 150 (1970)), amended in other part , 777 F.2d 329 (5th Cir. 1985), cert. denied , 476 U.S. 1142 (1986). Randle's claim against Superior Products fails because he has failed to show that he was injured as the result of any state action. His sole claim is against Superior Products, a company which Randle described as the "distributor" of the defective product. Randle has not alleged that Superior is a state actor and therefore he cannot establish that state action caused his boil to develop, nor has he alleged any basis for jurisdiction other than § 1983. Randle's appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because this appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
April 28, 2000

		QUARTERLY REPORT TO THE LIMITED PARTNERS
			OF DSI REALTY INCOME FUND VIII


DEAR LIMITED PARTNERS:

We  are  pleased  to  enclose  the  Partnership's  unaudited  financial
statements  for  the  period  ended  March 31, 2000.  The  following  is
Management's  discussion  and  analysis  of  the  Partnership's  financial
condition  and  results  of  its  operations.

For  the  three  month  periods  ended  March 31, 2000  and  1999, total
revenues increased 5.1% from $488,691 to $513,381 and total expenses
decreased 1.0% from $351,201 to $347,648.  Equity in income of the real
estate joint venture increased 25.5% from $25,649 to $32,189.  As a result,
net income increased from $163,139 to $197,922 for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2000, as compared to the same period in 1999. Rental revenue
increased as a result of higher occupancy and unit rental rates.  Occupancy
levels for the Partnership's five mini-storage facilities averaged 84.0% for
the three month period ended March 31, 2000 and 81.4% for the same period
in 1999.  The Partnership is continuing its marketing efforts to attract
and keep new tenants in its various mini-storage facilities.  Operating
expenses decreased approximately $8,200 (2.9%) primarily as a result of
lower maintenance and repair expense, partially offset by an increase
salaries and wages expense.  General and administrative expenses increased
approximately $4,700 (7.0%) primarily as a result of higher incentive manage-
ment fees.  Incentive management fees, which are based on cash available
for distribution, increased as a result of the increase in net income.
Equity in income of real estate joint venture increased as a result of
lower operating expenses, primarily maintenance and repair expense, at
that facility.

The  General  Partners will  continue  their  policy  of  funding  continuing
improvement and maintenance of Partnership  properties  with  cash  generated
from operations.  The  Partnership's  resources  appear  to  be  adequate  to
meet its needs.  The General Partners anticipate distributions to the Limited
Partners  to  remain  at  the  current  level  for  the  foreseeable  future.

We are not enclosing a copy of the Partnership Form 10-Q as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission since all the information set forth
therein is contained either in this letter or in the attached financial
statements. However, if you wish to receive a copy of said report, please
send a written request to DSI Realty Income Fund VIII, P.O. Box 357, Long
Beach, California 90801.

                              Very truly yours,

                              DSI REALTY INCOME FUND VIII
                              By: DSI Properties, Inc., as
                              General Partner



                              By  /s/ Robert J. Conway
                                  ____________________________
                                 ROBERT J. CONWAY, President
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2370 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2370

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in New 
  York City, New York, as the ``Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in New York City, 
New York, shall be known and designated as the ``Daniel Patrick 
Moynihan United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel Patrick 
Moynihan United States Courthouse.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# Lyndon B. Johnson: A Featured Biography

**

----

When Texas congressman Lyndon Johnson won election to the Senate in 1948, he took the hotly contested race by a margin of just 87 votes, earning the nickname “Landslide Lyndon.” Once in the Senate, he quickly allied himself with Senator Richard B. Russell, the Georgia Democrat who chaired the Senate Armed Services Committee and the powerful Southern Caucus. With Russell's support, Johnson became Democratic whip in 1951 and two years later was elected Democratic leader. When his party regained control of the Senate in 1955, Johnson became majority leader, a post he held until he resigned to become vice president. As leader, Johnson relied heavily on his powers of persuasion, a strategy known as the “Johnson Treatment,” which he used to guide to passage such legislation as the Civil Rights Act of 1957. He sought the presidency in 1960 but became the vice-presidential candidate when John F. Kennedy won the nomination. Kennedy's assassination on November 22, 1963, sent Johnson to the White House. 

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Lyndon Baines Johnson
Exhibit 99.2 (b)
Deloitte &
   Touche LLP
                         Suite 1200        Telephone: (714) 436-7100
                         695 Town Center Drive  Facsimile: (714) 436-7200
                         Costa Mesa, California 92626-1924
                                                                 

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

To Long Beach Mortgage Company:

We have examined management's assertion about Long Beach Mortgage
Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as
of and for the year ended December 31, 1995 included in the
accompanying management assertion.  Management is responsible for
Long Beach Mortgage Company's compliance with those minimum
servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on
our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
Long Beach Mortgage Company's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on Long Beach
Mortgage Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Long Beach Mortgage
Company's compliance with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 1995 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


\s\ Deloitte & Touche LLP


March 29, 1996
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6711

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CALVIN FONVILLE, a/k/a Cal,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief 

District Judge. (2:95-cr-00049-RGD-3)

Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 27, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Fonville, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Fonville appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his 

sentence. Because Fonville’s Guidelines range remains unchanged

under Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, we find no 

reversible error. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 

478 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
  Name
    
    Jurisdiction225 Summit Associates LLC
    
    New JerseyCLD Corporation
    
    DelawareHealtheon International LLC
    
    DelawareWebMD International, LLC
    
    DelawareWebMD Canada Ventures, Inc.
    
    CanadaWebMD UK Limited
    
    England & WalesHealtheon Software India Private Limited
    
    IndiaHLTH Domain Corporation
    
    DelawarePRX Holdings Corp.
    
    DelawareSNTC Holding, Inc.
    
    DelawarePorex Corporation
    
    DelawarePorex Surgical, Inc.
    
    DelawarePorex Surgical GmbH
    
    GermanyPorex Technologies GmbH
    
    GermanyPorex Technologies LTD
    
    EnglandPorex Technologies SDN.BHD
    
    MalaysiaSYN Business Holdings, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSYN Healthcare Service, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSYNC Corp.
    
    New JerseyWebMD Health Corp. (83.5% owned by HLTH Corporation)
    
    DelawareWebMD, LLC
    
    DelawareEndeavor Technologies, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaHW Japan, Inc.
    
    DelawareMDhub, LLC
    
    ConnecticutMedicineNet, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaNational Physicians DataSource, LLC
    
    ConnecticutOnHealth Network LLC
    
    WashingtonBabyData.com, Inc.
    
    DelawareDemand Management, Inc.
    
    ColoradoHealth Decisions, Inc.
    
    ColoradoHealth Decisions International, LLC1
    
    ColoradoPhysicians Telephone Directory, Inc.
    
    ConnecticutRxList, Inc.
    
    DelawareRxList LLC
    
    CaliforniaTelemedics, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaWebMD Domain Corp.
    
    Delaware
 
 1
    
    70% owned by Demand Management, Inc. and 30% owned by
Health Decisions, Inc.




---



##### 



Name
    
    JurisdictionWebMD Health Services Group, Inc.
    
    DelawareSubimo LLC
    
    DelawareHealthShare Technology, Inc.
    
    DelawareSummex Corporation
    
    IndianaOW Corp.
    
    DelawareMedscape LLC
    
    DelawareConceptis LLC
    
    DelawareMedsite CME LLC
    
    DelawareeMedicine.com LLC
    
    DelawareWebMD International, Inc.
    
    DelawareWebMD Professional Services LLC
    
    DelawareMedsite LLC
    
    Delaware
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

BOWATER INCORPORATED
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF UNAUDITED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO INFORMATION)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Nine Months Ended
                                                               September 30,
                                                            2002           2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EARNINGS:

Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests   $ (141.5)    $ 162.1

Add: Fixed charges from below                                 137.3       120.0
Less: Capitalized interest                                      5.8         7.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           $  (10.0)    $ 275.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FIXED CHARGES:

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized                 122.8       102.7
Capitalized interest                                            5.8         7.1
Estimate of interest within rental expense                      2.2         2.0
Amortized premium and discounts related to indebtedness         6.5         8.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           $  137.3     $ 120.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                             --          2.3x
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                    $ (147.3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------