alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                        HALL, KINION & ASSOCIATES, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



HALL KINION AND ASSOCIATES, UK LIMITED, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Registrant organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.

GROUP-IPEX, INC., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, organized under
the laws of the State of California.

TKO, Personnel, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, organized
under the laws of the State of California.

Interactive Acquisition Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Registrant, organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

Huntington Acquisition Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant,
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

TKI Acquisition Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant,
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.
Ohunene O. Lawal GLINTON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. AND R, INC., a Georgia Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Michael Darby, and those persons similarly s ituated with Mr. Darby, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. Cobb Center Pawn and Jewelry Brokers, Inc., a Georgi a corporation, N.Y. Diamond Corporation, etc. et al., Defendants-Appellees. Susan Walker, and all persons similarly s ituated with Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. Mike Horton; Cash Express, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 98-8405, 98-8406 and 98-8872. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 2, 2000. Appeals from the United States District Court for th e Northern District of Georgia (Nos. 97-03012-1-CVTWT, 97-03013-1-CV-TWT, 97-03015-1-CV-TWT); Thomas W. Thrash, Judge. Before HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs who had borrowed money from Georgia paw nbrokers at interest rates of 20 or 25 percent per month brought suit against the pawnbrokers alleging the transactions were illegal and void because they violated Georgia's criminal usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaints on the ground that the transactions complied with Georgia's pawnbroker statute, O.C.G.A. § 44- 12-130 et seq., and such transactions are not controlled by the criminal usury statute. The district court decided that the two statutes conflict and cannot be harmonized and that the pawnbroker statute governs the subject transactions rather than the criminal usury statute. The Court granted defendants' motions and dismissed the cases.

### 2 The cases were consolidated on appeal to this Court. Having substan tial doubt about the proper resolution of the state law issue presented by this ca se, we certified the following questions to the Georgia Supreme Court: CAN THE STATUTORY SCHEME REGUL ATING PAWNBROKERS, § 44-12-130-138 BE READ HARMONIOUSLY WITH THE CRIMINAL USURY STATUTE, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18, SO THAT BOTH APPLY TO "PAWN TRANSACTIONS" AS DEFINED IN O.C.G.A. § 44-12-130(3), OR ARE SUCH TRANSACTIONS MEANT TO BE GOVERNED EXCLUSIVELY BY O.C.G.A. § 44-12-130-138. IS THE PERMISSIBLE RATE OF INTEREST AND FEES CHARGED IN "PAWN TRANSACTIONS" AS DEFINED IN O.C.G.A. § 44-12-130(3) GOVERNED SOLELY BY O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131, OR DOES THE CRIMI NAL USURY STATUTE, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18, APPLY TO MODIFY ALLOWABLE CHARGES SO THAT THE INTEREST CHARGED IN THESE TRANSACTIONS VIOLATES GEORGIA LAW. Glinton v. And R Inc., 173 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir.1999). In a thorough opinion, the Georgia Supreme Court answered the certified questions by concluding that these statutes cannot be reconciled and that the crimin al usury statute is inapplicable to pawn transactions. See Glinton v. And R, Inc., 271 Ga. 864, 524 S.E.2d 481 (1999)(Benham, C.J., dissenting). In light of that opinion the district court's order dismissing plaintiffs' complaints was correct. AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

            CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Paul Yeh, Associate Vice
President - Finance Center, of Macronix International Co., Ltd. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

1.    The Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
      2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: June 27, 2005

By: /s/ Paul Yeh
    --------------------------
Name: Paul Yeh
Title: Associate Vice President - Finance Center

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12109 and #12110]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-1897-DR), dated 04/02/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/12/2010 through 04/15/2010.                    

*Effective Date:*                         05/07/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/01/2010.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/03/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of NEW JERSEY, dated 04/02/2010, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Cumberland, Gloucester, Hunterdon, Ocean.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-11750 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Global Med Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act  of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 22, 2007

| | /s/ Michael I. Ruxin, M.D.
Name:  Michael I. Ruxin, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
documentation authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Global Med
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Global Med Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7797

MICHAEL G. KESELICA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES A. MOOSE, in his individual and official capacity as the Montgomery County Police Chief (since resigned); THOMAS P. REICH, in his individual and official capacity as a Montgomery County Police Detective (since retired); MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland, Defendants - Appellees. No. 03-7824

MICHAEL G. KESELICA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOUGLAS GANSLER, in his individual and official capacity as State’s Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland; BRYAN ROSLUND, in his individual official capacity as Assistant State’s Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland; FRANK MALONEY, in his individual and official capacity as Assistant State’s Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland; THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.- 2 - Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 2703-1-AMD; CA-03-2704-AMD) Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 6, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael G. Keselica, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Michael G. Keselica appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeKeselica v. Moose , No. CA-03-2703-1-AMD; Keselica v. Gansler , No. CA-03-2704- AMD (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000743457
<NAME> 83B
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         254,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  297,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               551,560
<PP&E>                                      19,500,879
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,646,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,405,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,355,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,405,679
<SALES>                                        550,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               558,301
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                278,602
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            278,602
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   278,602
<EPS-BASIC>                                       8.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,037
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             123
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,774
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    140,023
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,148
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            34,433
<LOANS>                                        408,452
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 653,688
<DEPOSITS>                                     540,359
<SHORT-TERM>                                    14,291
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,445
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,800
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 653,688
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,627
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,584
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   719
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                35,930
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,743
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,884
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,046
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      780
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  42
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,641
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,313
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,313
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.23
<LOANS-NON>                                        925
<LOANS-PAST>                                       563
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   212
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,015
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,003
<RECOVERIES>                                       222
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,016
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               780
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-20116

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MAXIMIANO SANTIAGO-CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-452-1

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Maximiano Santiago-Cruz has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Santiago-Cruz has filed a response. The record

is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Santiago-Cruz’s

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be

resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district

court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 12, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-20116 Document: 00511027435 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
No. 09-20116

2

allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006)

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the

record, counsel’s brief, and Santiago-Cruz’s response discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Santiago-Cruz’s motion to proceed pro se is

DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

Case: 09-20116 Document: 00511027435 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
```
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the
"Report") of Telemetrix Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2004, I, Michael Tracy, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

July 22, 2004

                                       /s/ Michael Tracy
                                    Name:  Michael Tracy
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Accounting Officer)
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

BOWATER INCORPORATED
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF UNAUDITED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIO INFORMATION)

                                                       Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                       -------------------------
                                                         2002             2001
                                                       --------         --------
EARNINGS:

Income (loss) before income taxes and
  minority interests                                    $(74.6)          $161.0

Add: Fixed charges from below                             92.3             81.7
Less: Capitalized interest                                 3.4              5.8
                                                        ------           ------

                                                        $ 14.3           $236.9
                                                        ======           ======

FIXED CHARGES:

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized             83.1             69.0
Capitalized interest                                       3.4              5.8
Estimate of interest within rental expense                 1.5              1.4
Amortized premium and discounts related
  to indebtedness                                          4.3              5.5
                                                        ------           ------

                                                        $ 92.9           $ 81.7
                                                        ======           ======

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                          --             2.9x
                                                        ======           ======

DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                 $(78.0)
                                                        ======
j f{E:Tr.c+.%.m-mt,-\2-E>

7 -1- lots'

^\M\S-Q\

ima /jto

LpJtcap-

^a&dLe^£s-GLuL-m -Jo 7^^—cuqava^J\jjl.miLfjLcJj jy/p-liT"••or' rhk

IItfth DlSJfiC^r fo^rj- n-p SmYth Cn^+y f~f~7pL<iS en

-ti\< Url-h T.s fnco^jofef-t'•'. "/Tx 7J))s-fr>crfr- Clerk Q'f

Y—qj^

eg 5

7- \r^pa^*<^~ doQumiA-f~ ~fh++- tY\iL$-f- joe tbJZJj^A±_A La

I h(\f\]<5 -f-or y®u/"j~~l/*.< -

fttA Akj^^c

iL_J3y_St4.

^m/^_/lit/it

|£8V&

ML 072()15ApP£Al&~

-^»Wca'sfe-e«
Order entered April 6, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00965

- CV

GALOVELHO, LLC , Appellant

V.

GREG ABBOTT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF THE STAT E OF TEXAS; COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS ; AND CITY OF FRISCO, TEXAS , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219

- 02595

- 2020

O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 5, 2022 unopposed motion for a three

week extension of time to file its brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the

brief be filed no later than May 4, 2022.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE