alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.2****EXHIBIT 12.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Paul Yeh, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Macronix International Co., Ltd.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: July 2, 2007           By: /s/ Paul Yeh           Name: Paul Yeh    Title: Associate Vice President — Finance Center
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2010 (the  "Report")  I,  Harinder
Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18USC ss.ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: May 24, 2010

                      By: \s\Harinder Dhillon
                      -------------------------------------------------------
                      Harinder Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President
                      (Principal Executive Officer)


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Power Of Attorney Letter             Exhibit 24.1
January 18, 2001


Raymond D. Hill                                    James A. Ward
1155 Perimeter Center West                         1155 Perimeter Center West
Atlanta, Georgia  30338                            Atlanta, Georgia  30338

Dear Messrs. Hill and Ward:

         Southern  Energy,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  proposes  to file  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission,  under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.

         The Company and the undersigned  directors and officers of the Company,
individually  as a director  and/or as an officer of the  Company,  hereby make,
constitute  and  appoint  Raymond  D. Hill and James A. Ward our true and lawful
Attorneys for each of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and
cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with
the foregoing said Annual Report on Form 10-K and any  appropriate  amendment or
amendments thereto and any necessary exhibits.

                                    Yours very truly,

                                    SOUTHERN ENERGY, INC.


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           S. Marce Fuller
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           A. D. Correll


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           A. W. Dahlberg


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           H. Allen Franklin


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           Elmer B. Harris


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           William M. Hjerpe


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           David J. Lesar


                                    By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           W. L. Westbrook
APPENDIX A: APPROVED RESOLUTION OF THE

AUGUST 30, 2011, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, approves the Smithsonian Institution's budget request for appropriated funds for

Fiscal Year 2013 for presentation to the Office of Management and Budget. Any material

changes in program plans incorporated into this budget shall be made only with the approval of

the Board of Regents or its Executive Committee.  [2011.08.02]
# Alben Barkley: A Featured Biography

**

----

Born to tenant tobacco farmers in 1877, Alben Barkley's political views were shaped in part by his impoverished upbringing. As a member of the House of Representatives, he established a reputation as a Wilson Democrat with strong party loyalties. In the Senate, he became a skilled orator with an endless repertoire of anecdotes. As Senate majority leader, he gained the reputation for being President Franklin Roosevelt's spokesman on Capitol Hill. When he criticized FDR's veto of a tax bill in 1944, however, and resigned as majority leader in protest, the temporary break with Roosevelt earned him greater respect among his colleagues who unanimously reelected him as leader. Becoming vice president in 1948, Barkley would be the last vice president to routinely preside over the Senate.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Alben Barkley
# Earle C. Clements: A Featured Biography

**

----

Earle C. Clements of Kentucky served only seven years in the Senate, from 1950 to 1957, but his tenure was marked by a quick rise to leadership and the ability to assume legislative responsibility during a time of crisis. Clements joined the Senate in 1950 after serving two terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and three years as Kentucky’s governor. Elected as Democratic party whip  in 1953, he became second-in-command to Majority Leader Lyndon B. Johnson when their party took control of the Senate in 1955. That year, as the Senate began its July 4th recess, Johnson suffered a major heart attack. When senators returned to work on July 5, Earle Clements became acting majority leader. Clements’s great challenge, noted one reporter, was to show “whether his generalship is equal to Mr. Johnson’s.” With Clements occupying the leader’s desk, Republican president Dwight Eisenhower hoped to take advantage of a leadership vacuum to gain some legislative ground, but Clements pushed back, making clear his intention to continue what Johnson had labeled “responsible opposition.” Throughout the final weeks of the session, Clements proved to be a tough task master who effectively maintained a unified coalition that kept the president in check. Clements’s moment of power came at a cost, however, as the duties of leadership kept him off the campaign trail. He lost his bid for reelection in 1956. Quiet but effective, Clements was a skilled political organizer. He’s as “plain as an old shoe,” noted a reporter, but as another commented, “He gets the job done.”

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
EX-32.0



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Tri-State 1st Banc, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof I, Charles B. Lang, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                              
|------------- |  | -----------------------------
|              |  | Tri-State 1st Banc, Inc.     
|              |  | (Registrant)                 
|              | 
|Date:         |  | /s/ Charles B. Lang          
|March 2, 2005 |  | Charles B. Lang              
|              |  | President                    
|              |  | (Principal Executive officer)



In connection with the annual report
of Tri-State 1st Banc, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof I, Kevin Anglemyer Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                         
|------------- |  | ------------------------
|              |  | Tri-State 1st Banc, Inc.
|              |  | (Registrant)            
|              | 
|              |  | /s/ Kevin Anglemyer     
|Date:         |  | Kevin Anglemyer         
|March 2, 2005 |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT JARA C. UZENDA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 97-1841 AMERICAN REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-304-4-22) Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELJara C. Uzenda, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM:Jara C. Uzenda appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of American Republic in her breach of contract claim. Finding no error in the district court's order, we affirm. This Court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. , 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988). Summary judgment is properly granted when there are no genuine issues of material fact and when the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). All reasonable inferences are to be drawn in favor of the non-moving party. See Cole v. Cole , 633 F.2d 1083, 1092 (4th Cir. 1980). Uzenda was a career agent for American Republic. Her suit involves the payment of commissions following the termination of thecontract between the parties. According to Uzenda, the contract provision regarding these payments is ambiguous and should be construedagainst American Republic. We agree with the district court, however, that the contract is not ambiguous. Rather, the contract clearly states that an agent's commissions vest in accordance with the terms of the contract, the Commission Schedules, and the Vesting Schedule. The Vesting Schedule, in turn, provides that "if termination of anagent's contract occurs after the anniversary date of the agent's contract," the agent will receive a percentage of her commissions based upon the length of the agent's service with the company.We have considered all of Uzenda's arguments suggesting alternative interpretations and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of American Republic. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
2before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3
ex4-11.htm


    Exhibit 4.11

      CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST

      


      OF

      


      GREAT
SOUTHERN CAPITAL TRUST IV

      


      


      


      THIS
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF GREAT SOUTHERN CAPITAL TRUST IV (the “Trust”) is being
duly executed and filed by the undersigned on behalf of the Trust to form a
statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. §§3801 et seq.) (the
“Act”).

      


      


      
        	
                 
      

              	
                1.

              	
                Name.  The
      name of the statutory trust being formed is Great Southern Capital Trust
      IV.

              


      

      


      
        	
                 
      

              	
                2.

              	
                Trustee.  The
      name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with its principal
      place of business in the State of Delaware are as
  follows:

              


      

      


      Wilmington Trust Company

      1100 North Market Street

      Wilmington, DE 19890-1615

      ATTN: Corporate Trust
Services

      


      


      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust in
accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

      


      


      WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,

      not in
its individual capacity but solely as Delaware Trustee of the Trust

      


      


      


      By:       /s/ Michael H.
Wass                          

      Name:  Michael H.
Wass

      Title:    Financial
Services Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

p0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

147142

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147142

COA: 308379

Wayne CC: 11

- 007730

- FH

CHRISTOPHER KIRK ELLEDGE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Thomas R. Lumsden, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Ellis Manes, defendant in error.

Where a defendant is sued upon a note given in the year 1863, in part payment for property, of which he was in possession of an undivided half at the time of the trial, he is entitled to the benefit of the provisions of the Ordinance of 1865, notwithstanding his refusal to deliver up the property for the note. (R.)

Scaling Ordinance of 1865. Before Judge Johnson. Talbot Superior Court. March Term, 1872.

For the facts of this case, see the decision.

B. Hill; M. Bethune; E. H. Wokrill, for plaintiff in error.

W. A. Little, for defendant.

Warned, Chief Justice.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant on a promissory note for the sum of $1,500, dated *39410th of October, 1863, and due 1st of January, 1865. The note was given in part payment of a mill. The mill was sold for $6,000 in Confederate money, was .worth at the time of the purchase $2,000 in the present currency. Defendant had sold one half of the mill for Confederate money, and at the time of the trial was in the possession of the undivided half of the land and mill as *trustee for his wife.*The Court asked the defendant if he would give up the property to the plaintiff, he being willing to accept the same and surrender up to defendant his note. The defendant declined to give up the property to the plaintiff. The Court then charged the jury, “that the defendant was not entitled, under the state of facts, to any relief by way of reducing the note sued on, that the only relief for him was to surrender the land; that he must either give up the land and mill, or pay the note.” The jury found for the plaintiff $1,500, with interest and costs of suit. The defendant excepted to the charge of the Court. This was a Confederate contract, and the equities of the parties were to be adjusted under the provisions of the Ordinance of 1865, which the defendant relied on in his plea to the plaintiff’s action. In our judgment, the charge of the Court to the jury was error, the more especially as the defendant was in the possession of the property in *right of his wife,*and not in his own right.

'Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
# Qualifications & Terms of Service

**

----

The Constitution sets three qualifications for service in the U.S. Senate: age (at least thirty years of age); U.S. citizenship (at least nine years); and residency in the state a senator represents at time of election. The details of these qualifications were hammered out by the Constitution's framers during the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

----

Article I, section 3 of the Constitution requires the Senate to be divided into three classes for purposes of elections. Senators are elected to six-year terms, and every two years the members of one class—approximately one-third of the senators—face election or reelection.

Class I | Class II | Class III

----

The Constitution does not provide an oath of office for members of Congress, but specifies only that they "shall be bound by Oath of Affirmation to support this constitution." The oath of office that one-third of the Senate recites every two years is a product of the 1860s, drafted by Civil War-era members intent on ensnaring traitors. The oath-taking, however, dates back to the First Congress in 1789. The first oath served the Senate for nearly three-quarters of a century. The current oath, in use since 1884, is a milder version of the oath adopted in 1862.

U.S. Constitution
Ballot Box, Classification of Senators
Senator Elmer Thomas taking the Oath of Office 

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Related Links 

*A Term of a Senator: When Does it Begin and End?* (CRS) (pdf)

Electing and Appointing Senators

Idea of the Senate

New Senators (2001-Present)

Senate Freshmen Since Direct Election (1914)