alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the undersigned  officers of Integrated Security Systems,  Inc. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  December 31,
2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully  complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.


Date:   February 17, 2004                 /s/ C. A. RUNDELL, JR.
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          C. A. Rundell, Jr.
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                          Executive and Financial Officer


Date:   February 17, 2004                 /s/ RICHARD B. POWELL
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Richard B. Powell
                                          Principal Accounting Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by section 906 has been
provided to Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated
Security Systems,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

The  foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  as an exhibit to Form 10-QSB
pursuant  to  Item   601(b)(32)  of  Regulation  S-B  and  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB for  purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934, as amended,  and is not  incorporated  by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
syn_ex105-90331.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.5

    


    On
November 6, 2008, the Board of Directors revised the non-employee Board of
Director’s compensation policy as it relates to stock-based
compensation.  Pursuant to the prior policy, members of the Board of
Directors received a grant of 15,000 shares once every five years, which vested
3,000 shares per year, over five years.  The Board of Directors
modified this policy to increase the standard five-year award to non-employee
Directors from 15,000 options to 37,500 options.  To phase in this
modified policy in light of existing stock option grants made in different years
to various directors, the Board of Directors approved transition grants to
increase each non-employee Director’s annual vesting to 7,500 shares from the
present 3,000 shares, taking into account currently outstanding and unvested
grants.  Consequently, on November 13, 2008, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors awarded non-employee Directors an aggregate
of 186,000 options to purchase Synthetech’s common stock.  The options
were awarded at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, the market price of
Synthetech’s common stock on the date of grant.  These nonqualified
stock options were issued as part of the 2005 Plan.
Order filed January 27, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00412-CR

____________

JAMIN KIDRON STOCKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1585987

ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Winifred Akins Pastorini. 

Appellant’s brief was originally due October 25, 2021. We have granted extensions

of time to file appellant’s brief until January 13, 2022. When we granted the last 

extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional 

circumstances. On January 12, 2022, appellant filed another motion to extend time 
to file a brief until January 23, 2022. No brief was filed on that date. Accordingly, 

the motion is dismissed as moot and we issue the following order.

We order appellant to file a brief with the clerk of this court on or before

February 11, 2022. If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, the 

court may issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct 

a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the 

consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2376 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2376

         To suspend temporarily the duty on isobornyl acetate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2000

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on isobornyl acetate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.29.01    Isobornyl         Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     acetate (CAS                                                            31/04            ''
                     No. 125-12-2)                                                                             .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     2915.39.45)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 257 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 257

To state the policy of the United States regarding the deployment of a 
missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United 
            States against limited ballistic missile attack.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 20, 1999

  Mr. Cochran (for himself, Mr. Inouye, and Mr. Hagel) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To state the policy of the United States regarding the deployment of a 
missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United 
            States against limited ballistic missile attack.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Missile Defense Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE POLICY.

    It is the policy of the United States to deploy as soon as is 
technologically possible an effective National Missile Defense system 
capable of defending the territory of the United States against limited 
ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or 
deliberate).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

1.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
    (Form S-8 No. 333-04351) pertaining to the NOVA Corporation 1991 Employees
    Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan and the NOVA Corporation
    1996 Employees Stock Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
    No. 333-64683) pertaining to the NOVA Corporation 1996 Employees Stock
    Incentive Plan and NOVA Corporation Directors Stock Option Plan, the
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-64681) pertaining to the PMT
    Services, Inc. 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, 1994 Non-Employee
    Director Stock Option Plan and 1994 Incentive Stock Plan, the Registration
    Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-37220) pertaining to the NOVA Corporation 2000
    Employees Stock Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3
    No. 333-34796) pertaining to the FSB acquisition and Registration Statement
    (Form S-3 No. 333-55624) pertaining to the FSB earn-out agreement of our
    report dated February 14, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial
    statements and schedule of NOVA Corporation included in this Annual Report
    (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.




March 28, 2001
Atlanta, Georgia
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-14-00370-CR 

__________________

IN RE BRITTANY L. FRANKLIN

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

__________________________________________________________________

Relator Brittany L. Franklin filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which 

she asks this Court to compel the district clerk to transmit a copy of Franklin’s 

application for writ of habeas corpus, any answer filed, and a certificate “reciting 

the date upon which that finding was made” to the Court of Criminal Appeals. 

The district clerk is not a person against whom we may issue a writ of 

mandamus other than to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 

22.221(a), (b) (West 2004). Franklin has not shown that issuance of a writ against 

the district clerk is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See In re Pennington, No. 

09-08-370 CV, 2008 WL 4425521, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Oct. 2, 2008, 

orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
2

Franklin has not demonstrated that she is entitled to mandamus relief from 

this Court. See State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 

924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Accordingly, we deny relief on the petition for 

writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on September 23, 2014

Opinion Delivered September 24, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Aetna Services Inc. (formerly Aetna Life and Casualty Company):

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on:

-     Form S-3             Nos. 333-2682, 333-2684, and 333-30293;

-     Form S-8             Nos. 333-07073, 333-07077, 333-10143, and 333-25605.

of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. of our report dated February 28, 1996,
relating to the combined balance sheets of The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
and The Standard Fire Insurance Company and their Subsidiaries as of December
31, 1995 and 1994, and the related combined statements of income, shareholder's
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1995, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31,
1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. Our report
refers to a change to the methods of accounting for certain investments in debt
and equity securities, workers' compensation life table indemnity reserves and
retrospectively rated reinsurance contracts in 1993.




/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
March 23, 1998
Exhibit 15.1    KPMG LLP   Yonge Corporate Centre   4100 Yonge St.   Suite 200   Toronto, ON M2P 2H3
Telephone   Fax   Internet
(416) 228-7000   (416) 228-7123   www.kpmg.ca  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors  Celestica Inc.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113591, 333-88210, 333-71126, 333-66726, 333-63112) and Form F-3ASR (No. 333-199616)of Celestica Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2016, on the consolidated financial statements of Celestica Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and our audit report dated March 3, 2016 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the annual report on Form 20-F of Celestica Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.    Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants March 7, 2016 Toronto, Canada   GRAPHIC
#### Simeon Cohen, an Infant under the Age of Eighteen Years, by Simon H. Glass, as the Next Friend of Said Infant, Respondent, Appellant, *v.*Rose Katz (Otherwise Called Rose Cohen), Appellant, Respondent.

Cross-appeals from an order of the Special Term, entered on the 23d day of March, 1911.

Peb, Curiam:

The order should .be modified by reducing the allowance for counsel fee to $100, and by granting an allowance of $150 for the payment of expert witnesses. As'so modified order should be affirmed, without costs.

Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains certain summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements and notes thereto and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.  The Company files an
unclassified balance sheet, certain line items are not applicable.  All values
except share amounts are in thousands.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         116,191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  643,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          63,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 927,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         75,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        860
<COMMON>                                         5,345
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   927,854
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,475,616
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,438,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,856
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2473

To strengthen and enhance the role of community antidrug coalitions by

providing for the establishment of a National Community Antidrug Coalition Institute.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 26, 2000

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To strengthen and enhance the role of community antidrug

coalitions by providing for the establishment of a National Community Antidrug Coalition Institute.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Community

5 Antidrug Coalition Institute Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of Na8 tional Drug Control Policy may make grants to an organi-
2

•S 2473 IS

1 zation to provide for the establishment of a National Com2 munity Antidrug Coalition Institute.

3 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—The organization receiving a

4 grant under subsection (a) shall—

5 (1) be a national nonprofit organization that

6 represents, provides technical assistance and train7 ing to, and has special expertise and broad, national8 level experience in community anti-drug coalitions;

9 and

10 (2) establish a National Community Antidrug

11 Coalition Institute that will—

12 (A) provide education, training, and tech13 nical assistance for coalition leaders and com14 munity teams;

15 (B) conduct research, testing, and diffu16 sion of tools, mechanisms, and measures to bet17 ter evaluate and document coalition perform18 ance measures and outcomes; and

19 (C) bridge the gap between research and

20 practice by translating knowledge from research

21 into practical information.

22 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION.

23 There are authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000

24 for 2 years to make grants as provided in section 2.

Æ
NUMBER 13-11-00209-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

SARA DUBOSE, Appellant,

v.

JERRY KAY DUBOSE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND 

AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE DUBOSE FAMILY TRUST, 

& JOHN STEEN DUBOSE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND 

AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE DUBOSE FAMILY TRUST, 

AND CHERYL DUBOSE & SAN SABA ROYALTY 

COMPANY, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court 

of Gonzales County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 23, 2011. On 

October 5, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely 
2

filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of 

this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not 

significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response 

has been received from appellant. 

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a 

motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

3rd day of November, 2011.
NOTICE OF APPEAL

– JEFF LEWIS VS

. AURORA LOAN SERVICES

, LLC

, ET AL

. - P AGE 1 OF 2 Cause No. D-1-GN-11-000618

Jeff Lewis,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AURORA LOAN SERVICES and

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,

Defendants. In the District Court

201st Judicial District

Travis County, Texas

Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal

The Plaintiff hereby files the Notice of Appeal on Cause No. D-1- GN -11-000618;

Jeff Lewis, vs. Aurora Loan Services and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems.

The Plaintiffs wish to appeal the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment on all Issues dated December 16, 2014. The judgment is from the

District Court of Travis County, Texas. The appeal is to the Third Court of Appeals.

Respectfully submitted,

CASEY LAW OFFICE, P.C.

______________________________ Stephen Casey

Texas Bar No. 24065015

Casey Law Office, P.C.

595 Round Rock West Drive, Suite 102

Round Rock, Texas 78681

Telephone: 512-257-1324

Fax: 512-853-4098 3/2/2015 2:03:51 PM

Velva L. Price

District Clerk

Travis County

D-1-GN-11-000618

ACCEPTED

01-15-00362-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/7/2015 1:09:21 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKNOTICE OF APPEAL

– JEFF LEWIS VS

. AURORA LOAN SERVICES

, LLC

, ET AL

. - P AGE 2 OF 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was sent

by fax on M arch 2 , 20 1 5 , to the following parties or attorneys of record:

SETTLEPOU J. Garth Fennegan

State Bar No. 24004642

gfennegan@settlepou.com

Daniel T. Tobin

State Bar No. 24046978

dtobin@settlepou.com

Jared T. S. Pace

State Bar No. 24079098

jpace@settlepou .com 3333 Lee Parkway, Eighth Floor

Dallas , Texas 7 5219

- 5115

Phone: (214) 520

- 3300

Fax: (214) 526

- 4145

Attorney s for Defendants

AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC AND MERS

CASEY LAW OFFICE, P.C.

______________ Stephen Casey

Texas Bar No. 2406501
#### Morgan W. Hopler, Respondent, v. Masey J. Clark, Appellant.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with usual leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and answer upon payment of costs of demurrer and of this appeal.

All concurred, except Smith, P. J., not voting.