alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>      1010077
<NAME>     Karts International Incorporated
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                        2801746
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 466045
<ALLOWANCES>                                  3000
<INVENTORY>                                   909214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              4571144
<PP&E>                                        1295572
<DEPRECIATION>                                137746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11281901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         508724
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      4854
<OTHER-SE>                                    10537482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11281901
<SALES>                                       7626463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              7626463
<CGS>                                         6019971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2148769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              114498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            507696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1204458)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (153260)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1051198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1051198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.032)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CityFed Financial Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


                                        CITYFED FINANCIAL CORP.

                                        By: /s/ John W. Atherton, Jr.
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            John W. Atherton, Jr.
                                            Vice President and Treasurer
                                            (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: June 20, 2006
# Tentative 2010 Legislative Schedule

**

----

**111th Congress, 2nd Session**

The *tentative* schedule for 2010 has been announced. The list below identifies non-legislative periods (days that the Senate *will not* be in session). The schedule is also available in calendar format (pdf image). The 2009 tentative schedule is still available. 
| Date         | Action                  | Note                                   |
|--------------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Jan 5        | Convene                 | Pro forma session                      |
| Jan 19       | Reconvene               | Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday Jan 18. |
| Feb 15-19    | State Work Period       | Presidents' Day                        |
| Mar 29-Apr 9 | State Work Period       |                                   |
| May 31-Jun 4 | State Work Period       | Memorial Day                           |
| Jul 5-Jul 9  | State Work Period       | Independence Day                       |
| Aug 9-Sep 10 | State Work Period       | Labor Day- Sep 6                       |
| TBD          | Target Adjournment Date |
|   |
|--------|

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Days in Session 

These calendars (Congress.gov)  list the days the Senate met for each session of Congress.

Visit the "Sessions of Congress"  web page to find out more about this topic.

### House Calendar 

View the House of Representatives Calendars.

### Senators Phone List 

This list of senators' suite and phone numbers in pdf format is updated every couple of weeks at the beginning of a new Congress.

### Related Links 

Learn about the *Legislative Process and the United States Senate*. (CRS) (PDF)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2007 (the  "Report")  I,
Harinder Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18USC ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2007


By: \s\ Harinder Dhillon
    --------------------------------------------------------
     Harinder Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President
     (Principal Executive Officer)

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 10

- 489 V

(Not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

VALERIA FLORES, *

*

Petitioner

, *

* Filed: July 2, 2015

v. *

* Decision on Attorneys’

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Fees and Costs

HUMAN SERVICES *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

DECISION (ATTORNEY S’ FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 1 I is sue d a

decision on September 12, 2013. On July 30, 2015, the parties filed a s tipulation concerning

attorneys’ fees and costs in this matter. The parties’ stipulation re quests a total payment o f

$137,500.00 , representing all attorney’s fees and costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

In accordance with General Order #9, the stipula tion includes a statement that P etitioner incurred

no reim bursable costs in pursuit of his claim.

I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis

for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

300aa

- 15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate.

Accordingly, I h ereby award the total $137,500.00 as a lump sum in the form of a check

payable jointly to P etitioner and P etiti o n er’s couns el, Clifford Shoemaker

.

1 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 10 et seq . (2012 ).In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review fil ed pursuant to Appendix B of the

Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in

accordance herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

/s/ George L. Hastings, Jr.

George L. Hastings, Jr.

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing the

right to seek review.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 023

- 1825 LT Case No. 2015

- CF

- 001320

- A

_____________________________ W ILLIAM S ANDERS , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County. Dennis Craig , Judge.
William Sanders, Jasper, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Talla hassee, and Deborah Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee. May 28, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. L AMBERT , J AY , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur
.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001009675
<NAME>                        Sawtek Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         115,274
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,135
<INVENTORY>                                    8,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,137
<PP&E>                                         73,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                 26,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,937
<BONDS>                                        1,790
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,579
<SALES>                                        100,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,276
<CGS>                                          42,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                47,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                   16,522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            30,684
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   30,684
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.72



</TABLE>
# States in the Senate | Maine

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Susan M. Collins (R)***Hometown: Bangor*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Angus S. King,  Jr. (I)***Hometown: Brunswick*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Maine became the 23rd state to join the Union on March 15, 1820. Maine's first senator, John Holmes, took office on June 13, 1820, followed the next day by Maine's second senator, John Chandler. Maine's longest-serving senators include Eugene Hale (1881-1911), William Frye (1881-1911), and Margaret Chase Smith (1949-1973). The first woman to serve in both houses of Congress, Margaret Chase Smith served 24 years in the Senate, a record for female senators that remained unbroken until 2011. Among those who rose to leadership positions are William Frye, who served as the Senate's president pro tempore; Wallace White and George Mitchell, who became party floor leaders; and Margaret Chase Smith, who became the first woman to serve in a leadership position as Republican Conference chair. As vice president, Hannibal Hamlin served as the Senate's constitutional president or presiding officer.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Dr. David Kennedy, Deceased.

Motion denied.
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE  ST. JOE COMPANY DEFERRED CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2002)
  1.
    
    The first paragraph of Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended by adding the following
sentence after the second sentence:Notwithstanding the foregoing, an eligible Employee or Participant must file a Deferral
Election Agreement with the Plan Administrator by June 30, 2008 in order to defer bonus
compensation earned in 2008 and payable in 2009.2.
    
    In all other respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.
  THE ST. JOE COMPANYDated: June 1, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Rusty BozmanRusty BozmanVice President - Human Resources
No. 1,804

#### STATE ex rel. SUTTON, Relator, *v.*DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT et al., Respondents.

Original- — Writ of Supervisory Control.

(For former opinion, see 27 Mont. 128, 69 Pae. 988.)

On motion to- tax costs.

Decided January 31, 1903.

*Messrs. McBride &*McBride, for Relator.

*Messrs. McIIatton, &*Cotter, for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

— Relator’s cost bill and respondents’ ’ motion to tax costs herein having been submitted heretofore to the court: It is ordered that all the objections of respondents to the cost bill -of relator be and the same are hereby overruled, except as to- the item of $63.00 for preparation of the record, and that the said item of $63.00 be and the same is hereby stricken out and disallowed and the rest of said cost bill allowed.

(Mr. Justice Hollo wat, having taken no part in the consideration of this cause, takes no part in this decision.)
Filed 6/4/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2002 ND 87

William D. Looney, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Rebecca Looney, 

n/k/a Rebecca Runnels, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20010289

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary A. Holum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Robert S. Rau, Bosard, McCutcheon & Rau, Ltd., P.O. Box 939, Minot, N.D. 58702-0939, for plaintiff and appellant.

Carol K. Larson, Pringle & Herigstad, P.C., P.O. Box 1000, Minot N.D. 58702-1000, for defendant and appellee.

Looney v. Looney

No. 20010289

Per Curiam.

[¶1]William D. Looney appealed from a judgment enforcing an earlier divorce judgment, arguing the district court selectively enforced the earlier judgment and deprived William of the benefits of the parties’ property stipulation.  The judgment is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner
#### Jim Williams, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The State of Georgia, defendant in error.

Where, upon the trial of the defendant-1 for the offense of an assault with intent to murder, the jury returned a verdict finding “the defendant guilty of an assault with intent to kill,” and upon being remanded to the jury-room, with instructions from the Court, returned a general verdict of “ guilty,” a motion in arrest of judgment, based upon the facts aforesaid, was properly overruled. (R.)

Criminal law. Verdict. Practice. Before Judge Hopkins. Pulton Superior Court. April Term, 1872.

Por the facts of this case, see the decision.

Farrow & Thomas, for plaintiff in error. 1st. The first verdict, though a special and partial verdict, was nevertheless valid and binding. Judgment could have been rendered thereon: Graham *&*Waterman, on New Trials, vol. 3, page 1419; Bishop’s Criminal Procedure, vol. 1, sec. 831, *etseq;*Bishop’s Criminal Law, vol. 1, sec. 809. 2d. Special ver*648diets not amendable; except as to matter of form: Bishop’s Criminal Procedure, vol. 1, sec. 839: 26 Ga. R., 593.

J. T. Glenn, Solicitor General, for the State. 1st. The jury should have returned a general verdict of guilty, or not guilty, or guilty of some less offense: Code, sec. 4552. The Court was right in having the verdict made complete before receiving it: 26 Ga. R., 593; 14 *Ibid,*8; 28 *Ibid,*367,

Warner, Chief Justice.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of an assault with intent to murder. On the trial of the case, the jury came into Court with the following verdict: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of an assault, with intent to kill.” Objection being made to the form of the verdict by the Solicitor General, the Court, after making inquiry of the jury as to what was their intention to find by their verdict, and the response not being satisfactory, the jury were remanded to the jury-room by the Court, with instructions that the form of their verdict should be either a general verdict of guilty, or a general verdict of not guilty, or a partial verdict of guilty of an assault and battery. The jury, after having retired, returned into Court with a general verdict of guilty. The defendant made a motion in arrest of judgment, on the ground that the verdict was illegal, and contrary to law under the facts in the case, which motion was overruled by the Court, and the defendant excepted. We find no error in the refusal of the Court to grant the motion in arrest of judgment, on the statement of facts disclosed in the record. The first verdict was an informal and imperfect verdict, and it was the duty of the Court to remand, the jury to their room, with the instructions given to them in regard to their legal duty, as to the form of their verdict.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund IV (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not
been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission



|                        |  |                                   
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Daniel Stephenson             
|                        |  | Daniel Stephenson, General Partner
|                        |  | Rancon Realty Fund IV
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 5668

_____________________________
D ARRELL B. W ESLEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Waddell Wallace , Judge

.
March 1 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and W OLF and R AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Darrell B. Wesley, pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael L. Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 33-16525) pertaining to the Physiometrix, Inc. 1991 Stock Plan, 1996
Director Option Plan, and 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated
January 31, 2001, with respect to the financial statements of Physiometrix, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2001
Applied Signal Technology, Inc.
  Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  As Adopted Pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Report of Applied Signal Technology, Inc. (the Company)
  on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 4, 2007, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary L. Yancey,
  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Gary L. Yancey
--------------------------------------------- | Date: June 11, 2007
-------------------------------
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|Gary L. Yancey
        President and Chief Executive Officer     |