alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Roger L. Christensen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Columbia Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 24, 2003

/S/ ROGER L. CHRISTENSEN
-----------------------
Roger L. Christensen
President and Chief Executive Officer
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Januar y 17, 2007 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 12733 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o ck etN o s. 0 3 - 6 1 1 6 7 - C V- J AG 9 7 - 0 6 0 0 2 C R - J AG D A V I D A N T H O N Y R O S T A N , J R ., a .k .a . A n th o n y D a v id R o s ta n o , a .k .a . D a v id A n th o n y R o s ta n o , P e titio n e r - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , R e s p o n d e n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe r n D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Jan u ar y 17, 2007) B efo re A N D E R S O N , B IR C H an d D U B IN A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:A l th o u ghw eh av ei nth ep a s tc h o s e nt o d e c i d ef o r o ur s e l v e s wh i c hi s s u e s , i f any, 1 war rante d a COA, he re, remand se ems to be the moreviable option. See Thomas v . Crosby , 371 F .3 d 7 82 , 7 96 (1 1th

Cir . 2 00 4) (discus sin gc ourt of a pp e a l’ s disc re tio n whe ther t o re mand c a seto district court or whe ther to apply the COA standards itself), cert. denied, 5 43 U. S. 1 06 3, 12 5 S. Ct. 888 (2005). 2 A p p ellan t D av id R o stan , th ro u g h co u n se l, ch allen g es th e d istrict co u rt’s d e n i a l o f h i s mo t i o n t o v a c a t e , s e ta s i d e , o rc o r r e c ts e n t e n c e u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 25 5. A ft erthe deni al of hi s § 22 55 m ot i on , R ost an fi l ed a p ro se a ppl i c a t i on f or ce rt i fi ca t e of app ea l abi l i ty thatas se rt ed si x d i ff er enti ss ues, w hi ch the di stri ctcourt g r a n te d in a b la n k e t o r d e r . B ef ore a dd re ss i ng the m er i t s of hi s c l ai m s, w e not e that , w hen t he di stri ct c o u r t g r a n ts a c e r tif

ic a te o f a p p e a la b ility , its o r d e r“s h a ll in d ic a te w h ic h s p e c if ic i s s u e o ri s s u e s s a t i s f

y th e s h o w i n g r e q u i r e d b y [ § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) ] . ” 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 25 3(c) (3). B ec ause the di stri ctcourt ’ s orderdi d n otcom pl y w i th t he m andat es of § 2253( c ) ( 3) , w e va c a t e the or de ra nd r e m a nd thi s c a s e t o the di s tr i c tc our tf or the c our tt o s pe c i f

y the i s s ue s on w hi c h R os t a n “ m a de a s ubs t a nt i a l s how i ng of the deni al of a c on st i tut i on al ri gh t . ” S ee 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 3(c) (2). 1 VA C AT E D a n d R E MAND E D.
(logo) NORWEST MORTGAGE                                   Norwest Mortgage, Inc.
                                                          Home Campus
                                                          Des Moines, IA 50328
                                                          515/221-7300



                              Management Assertion

As of and for the period ended December 31, 1996,  Norwest  Mortgage Banking has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period,  Norwest Mortgage
Banking had in effect a fidelity  bond and errors and  omissions  policy in the
amount of $20 Million.




/s/ Mark Oman                                          January 15, 1997 
Mark Oman, President and CEO                           Date             
                                                       
/s/ Alta Jones                                         January 15, 1997
Alta Jones, Senior Vice President & CFO                Date           
                                                       
/s/ Cara Heiden                                        January 15, 1997
Cara Heiden, Executive Vice President, Loan Admin.     Date            
                                                       


NMFL #0820H 5/96
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                        718,000
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 283,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            1,450,000
<PP&E>                                                      3,439,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                              1,120,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             11,904,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       5,084,000
<BONDS>                                                     5,358,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       14,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,315,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               11,904,000
<SALES>                                                        74,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              181,000
<CGS>                                                          62,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               2,427,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (5,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            139,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (2,380,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (2,380,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (.18)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                           4,126
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,298
<PP&E>                                         120,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,548
<BONDS>                                        127,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                     50,846
<COMMON>                                             0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                    (68,627)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,544
<SALES>                                         52,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,174
<CGS>                                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,922
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,663)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    782
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,445)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (1,096.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Balance Sheet
or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee 

v.

JOHN IRA BRONSON, JR.,

Appellant 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 34 WAP 2017

Appeal from the Order of the Superior 

Court entered May 17, 2017 at No. 195 

WDA 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Exhibits is granted, and the Notice of Appeal is quashed. The Application for Stay is 

dismissed as moot.
#### HARRIS v. STEARNS, County Treasurer.

Laws 1890, p. 318, c. 150, § 3, re-enacted in. 1891, 1897, and carried into Rev. Pol. Code, § 2149, providing that possession of a tax receipt shall be conclusive evidence that all prior taxes on the property have been paid, when taken in connection with the entire revenue law, places the consequences of a treasurer’s failure to perform his duty in collecting taxes on him, and the statute is not in conflict with Const, art. 0, § 2, providing that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

The statute so construed is not in conflict with Const, art 11, § 7, declaring that all laws exempting property from taxation shall be void.

It is only tax receipts issued by the county treasurer in the usual discharge of his official duties that are conclusive evidence of the payment of prior taxes, within Laws 1890, p. 318, c. 150, § 3, re-enacted in 1891, 1897, and carried into Rev. Pol. Code, § 2149, providing that possession of a tax receipt shall be conclusive evidence that prior taxes *623have been paid, and the possession of a tax receipt obtained by larceny forgery, or fraud, is not within the statute.

Laws, 1890, p. 318, c. 1'50, § 3, re-enacted in 1891, 1897, and carried into Rev. Pol. Code, § 2149, providing that possession of a tax receipt shall be conclusive evidence that prior taxes “which aré chargeable against the lands in such receipt described, or in case of a personalty tax against the person named in such receipt have been fully paid,'1 provides for two classes of receipts, the first operating to release the land described in a receipt from prior charges, and the second operating to release the person named therein from all prior charges; and if the words “or in case of a personalty tax” relate to a receipt which includes both real and personal property taxes, they must be taken in connection with the words “all prior taxes chargeable,’; so that the possession of a receipt will be conclusive evidence that all prior taxes chargeable against the land described therein, or against ■the person named therein, have been paid.

Fuller, P. J., dissenting.

Opinion filed, June 27, 1906.)

On petition for rehearing.

Former opinion reversed, and judgment below reversed.

For former opinion, see 17 S. D. 439, 97 N. W. 361.

HANEY, J.

A statement of the issues presented by this appeal will be found in our former decision. Harris v. Stearns, 17 S. D. 439, 97 N. W. 361. The views expressed in the dissenting opinion then filed (a rehearing having been granted) are now adopted by a majority of the court.

For the reasons therein stated, our former order of .affirmance is overruled, and the judgment and order of the circuit court are reversed.

FULLER, P. J., dissenting.
#### Frank S. Elder, Appellant, v. International Railway Company, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael M. Earley, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form
10-K/A of Metropolitan Health Networks, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report:4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this annual report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting;;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of
registrants Board of Directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. DATE: July 28, 2004 /s/ Michael M. EarleyMichael M. EarleyChief Executive Officer
| Subsidiary                           |   | Jurisdiction   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------|
| JAKKS Pacific (HK) Limited           |   | Hong Kong      |
| JAKKS Pacific (Shenzhen) Company     |   | China          |
| JAKKS Pacific (Asia) Limited         |   | Hong Kong      |
| Play Along (Hong Kong) Limited       |   | Hong Kong      |
| Creative Designs International, Ltd. |   | Delaware       |
| Arbor Toys Company Limited           |   | Hong Kong      |
| JAKKS Sales Corporation              |   | Delaware       |
| JAKKS Pacific (UK) Ltd.              |   | United Kingdom |
| Disguise, Inc.                       |   | Delaware       |
| Disguise Limited                     |   | Hong Kong      |
| Kids Only, Inc.                      |   | Massachussetts |
| Kids Only Limited                    |   | Hong Kong      |
| Tollytots Limited                    |   | Hong Kong      |
| JAKKS Pacific (Canada), Inc.         |   | Canada         |
| JAKKS Pacific France, S.A.S.         |   | France         |
| JAKKS Pacific Iberia, S.L.      |   | Spain          |
# Cloture Motions - 81st Congress

**

----

|   |  |  |
|--------|--|--|
| From January 3, 1949 through January 2, 1951, 2                    cloture                    motions were                     filed.           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                            |
| Motions             Filed in                 1950                                                                                               | Action             and Result |
| **Date**                                                                                                                                        | **Measure** | **Subject** | **Filed By** | **Date** | **Vote** | **Result** |
| Jul 10                                                                                                                                          | S.1728 | Fair Employment Practices | Lucas | July 12 | 55                            -                            33   | F |
| May 17                                                                                                                                          | S.1728 | Fair Employment Practices | Lucas | May 19 | 52                            -                            32   | F |
|                                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                                                 |
|  **Vote Key:**                    61-32 No. 2 (for example) - tally and Roll Call Vote number; UC - Unanimous                     Consent. |
|  **Result Key:**                    F - Failed; I - Invoked; N - No action; V - Vitiated; W - Withdrawn.                                   |
|                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                            |

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure
# Henry B. Anthony: A Featured Biography

**

----

In the 19th century the Senate had no majority or minority leaders. Floor leadership was instead exerted by the chairmen of the party conferences. The genial Henry B. Anthony (1815-1884), a Republican senator from Rhode Island, served for several years as president pro tempore of the Senate, but gave up that post when he was elected conference chairman in 1875. As chair, Anthony acted much like the later majority leaders, giving committee assignments to members of his party, calling up bills for debate, and often speaking for his party on the issues of the day. He was also the author of the "Anthony Rule," an early attempt to limit debate in the Senate in the days before cloture. Known as the Father of the Senate, Anthony served from 1859 until his death in 1884.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Henry B. Anthony 

Henry B. Anthony
No. 1,931.

#### COTTER, Respondent, *v.*BUTTE & RUBY VALLEY SMELTING CO., Appellant.

*Appeal from, District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided July 13, 1903.

Rehearing granted November 20, 1903.

*Mr. James B. Murray,*and *Mr. Robert McBride,*for Appellant.

*Messrs. McUatton & Cotter,*for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

-The motion to dismiss this appeal is sustained and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.