alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Special Collections

**

----

***The U.S. Senate Leadership Portrait Collection*.** Prepared under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate by the Senate Historical Office and the Office of Senate Curator. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2007. To honor its past leaders, the U.S. Senate established the Senate Leadership Portrait Collection. This brochure provides an overview of the collection and a complete list of the Senate's floor leaders.

***Russell Senate Office Building Furniture*.** U.S. Senate Commission on Art. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2008. In 1909 the newly built Russell Senate Office Building officially opened. Along with the new building came a set of custom-made mahogany furniture for each office and committee room. The Russell furnishings, numbering thousands of pieces, were the largest single furniture contract issued by the Senate. This brochure provides a detailed account of the furniture's acquisition and use, illustrated by historical photographs and floor plans.

***Senate Art in Stamps*.** Prepared under the direction of the U.S. Senate Commission on Art by the Office of Senate Curator. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2002. Over 30 U.S. postal stamps depict art from the Senate's collection. The art in the Capitol is a fitting source for stamp designs, as it commemorates many of the nation's distinguished leaders and significant events. 

***Vice Presidential Bust Collection*.** Prepared under the direction of the U.S. Senate Commission on Art by the Office of Senate Curator. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2009. Initiated in 1885 the U.S. Senate's Vice Presidential Bust Collection is the Senate's oldest continuing art collection. It provides a unique survey of American sculpture from the 19th century to the present.

The Art & History bibliography lists more literature about the U.S. Senate and the U.S. Capitol.

        -  Virtual Reference Desk 
        -  Statistics & Lists 
        -  Bibliographies 
        -  How To... 
        -  Glossary 
        -  Senate Organization 
        -  The Constitution 
        -  Procurement 
        -  Employment & Internships 
        -            -  Senate Employment Office 
          -  Sergeant at Arms 
          -  Secretary of the Senate 
        -  Visiting
# States in the Senate | South Dakota Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20744 Conference Calendar

__________________ SAMUEL CITIZEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus STATE OF TEXAS; WAYNE SCOTT; WILLIAM M. HATTEN; JOHN B. HOLMES, JR., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA H 95-60
- - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Texas prisoner Samuel Citizen's complaint with prejudice because his claims have not accrued under Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994). However, the judgment is MODIFIED to reflect that Citizen's claims against Judge William Hatten and Harris County, Texas, District Attorney John B. Holmes, Jr., are DISMISSED ON GROUNDS OF ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY. Boyd v. Biggers , 31 F.3d 279, 284-85 (5th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of Inspector General

# AGENCY:

Office of Inspector General (OIG), HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document sets forth a correction to the OIG                         **Federal Register**                         notice published on January 10, 2010 (75 FR 2105), addressing our recently issued Updated Special Fraud Alert. Specifically, the Updated Special Fraud Alert addressed the statutory provision prohibiting durable medical equipment suppliers from making unsolicited telephone calls to Medicare beneficiaries regarding the furnishing of a covered item. An inadvertent error appeared on the heading line in section II of that document regarding the final issuance date of the notice. Accordingly, we are correcting that issuance date to                               ( print page 26197)                            ensure technical correctness of that document.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James A. Cannatti III, Senior Counsel, Office of Counsel to the Inspector General, (202) 205–0007.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In our publication of the OIG Updated Special Fraud Alert on Telemarketing by Durable Medical Equipment Suppliers, an inadvertent error appeared on the heading for section II on page 2105 regarding the final issuance date of the Updated Special Fraud Alert. The heading incorrectly indicated the issuance date as November 2009. The correct issuance date of this Updated Special Fraud Alert should read as January 2010.

Dated: May 5, 2010.

Daniel R. Levinson,

Inspector General.

[FR Doc. 2010–11163 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4152–01–P
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40192 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f- A pp el l ee v. JAV I ER H ER RE RA - CH AV EZ , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 08- C R - 1311- 1 B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * Th e Feder alPu bl i cD ef enderapp oin te d t o r epr es ent Javi erH er r er aC h a ve z h a s m ov ed f

or leav e to w i th d ra w an dh a s f i l ed a b ri ef i n acco rd a n ce w i th A n d er s v . Ca lif

o rn ia , 3 86 U . S. 7 38 ( 19 67 ) . H e r r e r a- Chave z ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . O uri nde pe nde ntre vi e w of t he re c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no n on frivo l ou s is s u e for ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

23, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 40192

2 w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rre s po ns ibil i t i e s he r e i n, a n dth e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2.
# James Eastland: A Featured Biography

**

----

James Oliver Eastland of Mississippi, widely known as "Big Jim," served in the U.S. Senate for 36 years. In 1941 he was appointed to fill a vacancy caused by the death of Democrat Pat Harrison. He was not a candidate in the special election to fill that vacancy, but the following year, he successfully challenged the incumbent for the seat. In 1956 Eastland became chairman of the Judiciary Committee, a post he held for more than 22 years—one of the longest service records of any Senate committee chair. As president pro tempore from 1972 to 1978, Eastland served as acting vice president for short periods in 1973 and 1974, when the vice presidency was vacant. A segregationist and opponent of civil rights legislation, Eastland signed the Southern Manifesto in 1956, a statement that called for resistance to desegregation in public schools in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark *Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka* decisions. Eastland often used his powerful position as chairman of the Judiciary Committee to prevent civil rights bills from being considered before the full Senate. Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield of Montana observed that once Eastland took a position, he "proved almost impossible” to move. “Indeed it requires nearly the entire Senate to budge him." In 1964 Mansfield carefully maneuvered the Civil Rights Act around Eastland’s committee to bring it to passage. Eastland retired from the Senate in 1978.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
Exhibit 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation
Subsidiary                                      or Organization                    Doing Business As
----------                                      ---------------                    -----------------

<S>                                             <C>                                <C>
Brookstone Homes, Inc.                          Delaware                           Brookstone Homes

Christopher Homes Custom                        Nevada                             Christopher Homes
    Home Division, Inc.

Fortress-Florida, Inc.                          Delaware                           Fortress Homes and
                                                                                   Communities of Florida

Fortress Galloway, Inc.                         Delaware                           Don Galloway Homes
    Don Galloway Homes, Inc.                    North Carolina
    Thornblade,LLC                              North Carolina
    Don Galloway Land, LLC                      North Carolina

Fortress Mortgage, Inc.                         Delaware                           Fortress Mortgage

Fortress Missouri-Construction, LLC             Delaware
    Whittaker Construction, Inc.                Missouri                           Whittaker Homes

Fortress Missouri-Lumber, LLC                   Delaware
     RRKTG Lumber, Inc.                         Missouri                           RRKTG Lumber

Fortress Missouri-Title, LLC                    Delaware
     Lewis and Clark Title Company              Missouri                           Lewis and Clark Title
                                                                                   Company

Fortress Oregon, LLC                            Delaware
     Quail Construction, Inc.                   Oregon                             Quail Construction
     Camden Crossing, LLC                       Oregon
     Quail Realty, LLC                          Oregon                             Quail Realty

Fortress Pennsylvania, LLC                      Delaware                           Iacobucci Homes

Fortress Tysons, LLC                            Delaware                           WestBrook Homes

The Genesee Company                             Colorado                           The Genesee Company
Genesee Venture Corp.                           Colorado
Genesee Communities I, Inc                      Colorado
Genesee Communities II, Inc                     Colorado
Genesee Communities III, Inc                    Colorado
Genesee Communities IV, Inc                     Colorado
Genesee Communities V, Inc                      Colorado

Landmark Homes, Inc.                            North Carolina                     Sunstar Homes

Wilshire Homes, Inc.                            Texas                              Wilshire Homes
     Wilshire Homes San Antonio, Ltd.           Texas
     Cullen Avenue Partners, Ltd.               Texas
     The Park at Los Indios, Ltd.               Texas
</TABLE>
VII

Private Calendar No. 29

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2289

[Report No. 106–966]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

For the relief of Jose Guadalupe Tellez Pinales.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Jose Guadalupe Tellez Pinales shall be held

7 and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the

8 United States for permanent residence as of the date of
2

•S 2289 RH

1 the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required

2 visa fee.

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 22), 2000.

Private Calendar No. 29

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2289

[Report No. 106–966]

AN ACT

For the relief of Jose Guadalupe Tellez Pinales.

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be

printed
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00240-CV

In the Interest of G.S., a child

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-FAM-60575-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed, due to appellant’s 

inability to pay costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 1, 2022
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                 DIRECT OR
                                                                                                                 INDIRECT
                                                                   JURISDICTION OF           TOTAL PAID-IN        EQUITY
           NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                  MAIN BUSINESS        INCORPORATION        CAPITAL OF SUCH ENTITY  INTEREST
------------------------------------------  -------------------  ----------------------  ----------------------  ---------
<S>                                         <C>                  <C>                     <C>                     <C>
Hui Ying Investment Ltd...................  Investment           Taiwan, R.O.C.              NT$500,000,000         100%
Run Hong Investment Ltd...................  Investment           Taiwan, R.O.C.              NT$500,000,000         100%
Kang Bao Investment Ltd...................  Investment           Taiwan, R.O.C.              NT$500,000,000         100%
Joyteck Co., Ltd..........................  Systems Solutions    Taiwan, R.O.C.              NT$96,775,000        87.98%
Macronix America, Inc.....................  Sales and marketing  California, U.S.A.          US$100,000             100%
Macronix Europe N.V.......................  Sales and marketing  Belgium                     EUR 62,000             100%
Macronix (B.V.I.) Co., Ltd................  Investment           British Virgin Islands      US$169,647,826         100%
New Trend Technology Inc..................  IC design            California, U.S.A.          US$23,850,000          100%
Wedgewood International Ltd...............  Investment           British Virgin Islands      US$35,010,000          100%
Macronix Pte Ltd..........................  Sales and marketing  Singapore                   US$100,000             100%
MaxNova Inc...............................  IC design            Taiwan, R.O.C.              NT$85,500,000         85.5%
Macronix Japan (Cayman Islands)...........  Investment           Cayman Islands              US$500,000             100%
Macronix (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.............  Sales and marketing  Hong Kong                   US$2,500,000           100%
</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT WU ZHANG, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-70957 Age n c y No. A096-188-823 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 23, 2014 * * B e fore : W . FLETC HER , R AW LINSON, a

n d C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Wu Zha n g , a nat ive and c itiz e n of C hina , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing his mo tion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a buse of disc re tion thede nia l of a

m otion to re ope n . N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983,



# FIL ED OCT 3 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).986 (9th C i r. 2010). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in de ny ing Zha ng’ s m otion to re ope n be c a use it wa s untim e ly

and num be r-barre d, se e 8 C . F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2), and Zha ng fa ile d to de m onstra

te tha t he qua lifie d for the e xc e p tion to the tim e and num e ric a l lim ita

t i ons for filing motions to re ope n ba s e d on m ate ria lly c ha nge d c irc um s ta nc e s arising in C hina , se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(3)(ii); N ajmabadi , 597 F.3d at 987 (e vide nc e m

u st be “ qua lita

tive ly diffe re nt” from

the e vide n c e pre se nte d at the pre vious he a

ring). Zha

ng’ s c onte ntion tha

t the B IA did not m a

k e a c are ful and individua

liz e d de te rm ination, a

nd his c onte ntion tha

t the B IA did not c are fully c onside r the ba c k g round m ate ria ls he subm itte d are not supporte d by

the re c ord. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 0 9 5 7 2
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Daniel T. Voelpel, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First FranklinCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4 The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: August 11, 2006 /s/ Daniel T Voelpel   Daniel T Voelpel    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   
1
#### Domenico Colaizzi, Respondent, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals granted.