alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Applied Signal Technology, Inc.
  Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James E. Doyle, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applied Signal Technology, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
  included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material respects the
  financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant
  as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

|Date: June 13, 2003
        ------------------------------- |  | /s/ James E. Doyle
      ---------------------------------------------------
      James E. DoyleVice President and Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Applied Signal Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Applied Signal Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form of 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), regardless of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 4138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of 
Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, February 17, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, February 17, 2010, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Donna Powers. 
For more information please contact Mrs. Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 
340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 15, 2010.
Linda Rivera,
Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-1127 Filed 1-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Gibbons 

, C.J. 

J. 

J. 

The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). Accordingly, 

we approve attorney Nancy Beth Page's resignation. SCR 98(5)(0(2). The 

petition is hereby granted. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 1:244.ACLir 

Douglas 

cr 

Cherry 

ritc±k. 

Saitta 

, J. 

J. 

cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Nancy Beth Page 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A .C194.
EXHIBIT 32.1




Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (“Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date: March 4, 2011
 
 /s/ STEPHEN G. BERMANStephen G. BermanChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications

 

I, Brien Reidy, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Hamptons Extreme, Inc.; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the  issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The issuer’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the issuer and have:

 a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this  report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and 

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal controls overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s second fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.  The issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

 

Date: November 13, 2009           /s/ Brien Reidy

                                                      BrienReidy, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11747]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration 12163]

Louisiana Disaster LA-00032 Declaration of Economic 
Injury

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan 
(EIDL) declaration for the State of Louisiana, dated 05/10/2010.
    Incident: Deepwater BP Oil Spill.
    Incident Period: 04/20/2010 and continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/10/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/07/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an Economic Injury declaration 
for the State of Louisiana dated 05/05/2010, is hereby amended to 
include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Parishes:
    Ascension, East Feliciana, Evangeline, Iberia, Livingston, Saint 
Charles, Saint Martin, Tangipahoa, Terrebonne, Washington
Contiguous Parishes and Counties:
    Louisiana: Acadia, Allen, Avoyelles, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, 
Jefferson Davis, Lafayette, Pointe Coupee, Rapides, Saint Helena, Saint 
Landry, Saint Mary, Vermilion, West Baton Rouge, West Feliciana
    Mississippi: Amite, Marion, Pike, Walthall, Wilkinson

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: May 10, 2010.
 Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-11747 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 24, 2012

p1017 

# Order

October 24, 2012

145646 & (65)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 145646

COA: 301546

Lenawee CC: 09

- 014365

- FC

JEFFERY ALAN DOUGLAS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 12, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the Court of Appeals erred in

concluding that the defendant was prejudiced by his attorney’s failure to inform him of a

mandatory minimum sentence if convicted of the charged offense where the trial court

determined that the defendant refused plea offers because he claimed to be innocent; (2)

whether the remedy for ineffective assistance of counsel may include re

- offering a plea

bargain to a lesser charge after the defendant has testified at a trial that he did not commit

an offense; (3) under MRE 803A(3), what circumstances other than “fear” may excuse

the failure of a child to report sexual abuse immediately; (4) whether a second

corroborat ive statement concerning sexual abuse is admissible under MRE 803A where

the statement includes a different allegation of sexual abuse than was provided in the

declarant’s first statement; and (5) whether a witness’s testimony that a child’s statement

was “substantiated” constitutes improper vouching. The motion for bond is DENIED.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups

interested i n the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,571
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             212
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                31,905
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     41,613
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         126,910
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           123,912
<LOANS>                                        438,299
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 706,713
<DEPOSITS>                                     605,975
<SHORT-TERM>                                    14,710
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,829
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        687
<COMMON>                                         4,200
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 706,713
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,073
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,764
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   418
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,255
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,888
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,456
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,799
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,669
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,569
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,019
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.33
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,164
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,681
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   650
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  8,276
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,574
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,358
<RECOVERIES>                                       403
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,288
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,200


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2008, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert B.Wagner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  Robert B. Wagner    |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Robert  B. Wagner        |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | March 5,  2008      |

 

----
Unrestricted Research Grant with the University of Colorado, dated July 27, 2007



 Exhibit 10.14 
 

 
 1200 17th Street, Suite 620 
 Denver, Colorado 80202 

Phone: 303-893-1599, Fax: 303-825-0883 
 July 27, 2007 
 Michael R. Bristow, M.D., PhD. 
 Division of Cardiology 
 University of Colorado Health Sciences Center 
 Denver, CO 80262 
 Dear Michael, 
 ARCA Discovery, Inc. wishes to make unrestricted gifts to the University of Colorado Foundation in support of your laboratory and the research associated with heart
failure. We direct these contributions to be allocated as summarized below. 
  

						
	 •       Lab Personnel Costs -
	    	$	197,000	 	annually
	 •       General Laboratory Costs
	    	 	90,000	 	annually
		    	 	 	 	
	Total Commitment	    	$	287,000	 	
		    	 	 	 	

 ARCA expects to fund this commitment through monthly payments of $23,917. These payments are contingent upon
ARCA’s financial condition, therefore this arrangement can be terminated at ARCA’s discretion. The effective date of the arrangement is July 1, 2007. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Richard B. Brewer
	Richard B. Brewer
	President & CEO


  

			
	Acknowledged:	 	/s/ Michael Bristow
		 	Michael Bristow, M.D., PhD.








 ARCA Discovery, Inc 
 INTERNAL USE ONLY 
 (Annual Costs) 
  

					
	 Name
	  	 Estimated Percentage of Salary Supported
	  	Amount of
Contribution
	 [ * ]
	  	[ * ]	  	[ * ]

  

	[*]	Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1909-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1909-DR), dated May 4, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 6, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 4, 2010.

Benton, Dickson, Humphreys, Maury, Rutherford, and Sumner Counties for Individual Assistance.

Benton, Dickson, Humphreys, Maury, Rutherford, and Sumner Counties for debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A and B), including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-11491 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41459

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONARDO GARCIA-CARRERA, also known as 

Pedro Hernandez-Garcia

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CR-309-1

--------------------

October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonardo Garcia-Carrera appeals the 100-month sentence

imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found

in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in

his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element

of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.

Garcia acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the

Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
No. 00-41459

-2-

523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for

Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Torres’s

argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.