1 N O

. 03 -16- 00004

- CV

I N T HE T HIRD C OURT OF A PPEALS A USTIN , T EXAS

_______________________________________

C ITY OF A USTIN , Appellant , V
. N ATIONAL M

EDIA C ORPORATION AND ACME P ARTNERSHIP

, L.P., Appellee s.

_______________________________________ A PPELLANT ’ S A MENDED S TATUS R EPORT

________________________________________
T O T HE H ONORABLE T HIRD C OURT OF A PPEALS :
Per the Court’s August 31, 2016 memorandum opinion, Appellant City of

Austin files its status report on abatement, which expires September 28, 2016.
Appellees do not agree with the City’s report.

The City of Austin no longer seeks abatement of its interlocutory appeal filed
on January 5, 2016. Abatement was granted on May 12, 2016, the Court has already

granted three extensions of the abatement, further abatement is not warranted, and
further delay is contrary to the City’ s right to an accelerated appeal. See Tex. Civ.

Prac. & Rem. Code
, § 51.014(a)(8).
Nine months have lapsed since the City filed its notice of interlocutory appeal
from the trial court’s denial of the City’s plea to the jurisdiction of Appellees’ Texas ACCEPTED 03-16-00004-CV 12961840 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/28/2016 5:33:42 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2

Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act (“UDJA”) and state and federal takings claims

under the Texas and United States Constitutions. Interlocutory appeal was abated

to allow the case to proceed to a bench trial on the remaining issue of damages for

takin gs claims only, not equitable relief under the UDJA

. A bench trial was held on

June 1 and June 2, 2016
, and after the close of evidence
, the trial court took the case

under consideration and entered a letter ruling on July 26, 2016

. A f inal judgment

was entered on September 12, 2016

. Appellees have requested Findings of Fact and

Conclusions of Law, have state d their intent to file post

- judgment motions, and also

to appeal the damages award.

First, jurisdictional issues and governmental immunity warrant that the City
of Austin, a governmental entity, not expend public resources unnecessarily. It is
Appellees’ burden to overcome t he threshold issues of jurisdiction and governmental

immunity
, issues which should be resolved before the City incurs any further time
and expense to fully brief the damages

. Second, a n i nterlocutory appeal is an accelerated appeal
, and the case has

already been unnecessarily delayed for many months awaiting a resolut ion on
damages
, which this Court cannot address before resolving the merits of this
interlocutory appeal. J udicial economy warrants proceed ing on the merits before

an y appeal on damages is heard

. Appellee s ’ damages appeal need not be before the

Court for a ruling on interlocutory appeal.3

Third
, Appellees’ have filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of

law, which extends the notice

- of

- appeal deadline to December, and have indicated

other post

- trial motions are to come that extend the trial co urt’s plenary power.

Unless permitted to go forwarded with this interlocutory appeal, th i s will further
delay resolution of the threshold jurisdiction issues until next year

. The bench trial did not moot any issues on interlocutory appeal, and did not

address the relief sought under the UDJA. The damages award is wholly
independent of the merits of the interlocutory appeal, and the City requests that the
abatement be lifted, and that it be permitted to exercis e its right to an accelerated

appeal without further delay into 2017

.
Dated: September 2 8 , 2016
Respectfully submitted,

A NNE L. M ORGAN , C ITY A TTORNEY M EGHAN L. R ILEY , C HIEF L ITIGATION

B Y : / S / Chris Edwards Chris Edwards Assistant City Attorney State Bar No. 00789276 Chris.edwards@austintexas.gov Andralee Cain Lloyd Assistant City Attorney State Bar No. 24071577 Andralee.lloyd@austintexas.gov City of Austin

- Law Depa rtment P. O. Box 1546 Austin, Texas 78767

- 1546 Telephone: (512) 974

- 24194 Facsimile: (512) 974

- 1311

C OUNSEL FOR A PPELLANT

C ERTIFICATE OF C ONFERENCE

I here by certify that on September 27, 2016, I conferred with counsel for Plaintiffs

- Appellees on the relief requested herein and they are opposed.

/s/ Andralee Cain Lloyd ANDRALEE CAIN LLOYD C OUNSEL FOR A PPELLANT5 C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I hereby certify that I served a copy of this notice on counsel of record electronically, in accordance with the Court’s rules on electronic filing, on September 2 8 , 2016 , as listed below:

Via E

- Service to: Eric B. Storm The Storm Law Firm 11 420 Bee Caves Rd., Suite A

- 100 Austin, TX 78738

Kurt Kuhn KUHN HOBBS PLLC 3307 Northland Drive, Suite 310 Austin, Texas 78731

C OUNSEL FOR A PPELLEES

/s/ Chris Edwards CHRIS EDWARDS C OUNSEL FOR A PPELLANT