alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11879]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, May 20, 2010.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Briefing on Final Rule--Parts 741 and 761 of NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations, Implementation of the Secure and Fair Enforcement for 
Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 (S.A.F.E. Act).
    2. Extension of the Temporary Corporate Credit Union Liquidity 
Guarantee Program.
    3. Insurance Fund Report.

RECESS: 11 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11:15 a.m., Thursday, May 20, 2010.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Member Business Loan Waiver Appeal. Closed pursuant to Exemption 
(8).
    2. Consideration of Supervisory Activities (2). Closed pursuant to 
some or all of the following exemptions: (8), (9)(A)(ii) and 9(B).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11879 Filed 5-13-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-35992 and 333-56216) and Forms S-3 (Nos.
333-36682, 333-43750, 333-64414, 333-72554, 333-74390 and 333-103231) of SIGA
Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2003 relating to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 31, 2003
New York, New York
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2330

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax

on telephone and other communication services.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 30, 2000

Mr. ROTH (for himself, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. ROBB, Mr. NICKLES, and Mr. MACK) introduced the following bill; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the excise tax on telephone and other communication services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND

4 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 33 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to facilities and services) is

7 amended by striking subchapter B.

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

9 (1) Section 4293 of such Code is amended by

10 striking ‘‘chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed
2

•S 2330 IS

1 by sections 4064 and 4121) and subchapter B of

2 chapter 33,’’ and inserting ‘‘and chapter 32 (other

3 than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and

4 4121),’’.

5 (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such

6 Code is amended by striking ‘‘section 4251 or’’.

7 (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such

8 Code is amended—

9 (i) by striking ‘‘imposed by—’’ and all that

10 follows through ‘‘with respect to’’ and inserting

11 ‘‘imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect

12 to’’, and

13 (ii) by striking ‘‘bills rendered or’’.

14 (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e)

15 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘COMMUNICA16 TIONS SERVICES AND’’.

17 (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by

18 striking ‘‘4251, 4261, or 4271’’ each place it ap19 pears and inserting ‘‘4261 or 4271’’.

20 (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such

21 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of

22 subparagraph (B), by striking subparagraph (C),

23 and by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subpara24 graph (C).
3

•S 2330 IS

1 (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of

2 such Code is amended by striking the item relating

3 to subchapter B.

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills

6 first rendered more than 90 days after the date of the

7 enactment of this Act.

Æ
EX-4.10






Exhibit 4.10





			
	 	 	 
	
	 	






			
	Matti Alahuhta	 	 
	President Kone Corporation	 	 
	Keilasatamas 3	 	 
	F1-02150 Espoo	 	 
	FINLAND
	 	12th January 2009






Dear Matti,



I am writing to confirm that the Board has agreed to extend your appointment for
four months from 1 February 2009. Your appointment will continue in all other aspects
on the terms set out in your letter of appointment dated 10 January 2006 excepting that
either you or the Board may give the other at least one month’s written notice to
terminate the appointment at any time.



Please sign the attached copy of this letter to confirm your acceptance of this
extension on the above terms and return the copy to me.




Yours sincerely




	 	 	 
	/s/ Andrew J. Parker
	 	 
	 

ANDREW J. PARKER

	 	 






	 	 	 
	To:

	 	Andrew Parker
	 

	 	Company Secretary






I accept this extension of my appointment on the above terms.




	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Matti Alahuhta

	 	 	 	19.1.2009
	 

Matti Alahuhta

	 	 	 	 
Date






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Andrew J Parker
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Company Secretary
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	BT Group
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	BT Centre

81 Newgate Street

London EC1A 7AJ

United Kingdom


	 	tel

fax

mob

e-mail
	 	+44 (0)20 7356 5237

+44 (0)20 7356 6135

+44 (0)7802 773635

andrew.j.parker@bt.com

	 	
	 	BT Group plc

Registered Office:

81 Newgate Street, London EC1A 7AJ

Registered in England and Wales no. 4190816


www.bt.com
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Lisa A. Weaver, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of StarTek, Inc.;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 
| Date:   May 31, 2012 | /s/   LISA A. WEAVER                                           |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Lisa   A. Weaver                                               |
|                      | Senior   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2008, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert B.Wagner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |                     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   |                     |
|   | /s/  Robert B. Wagner    |
|   | Robert  B. Wagner        |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | September 10,  2008 |

 

----
Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kim D. Thorpe,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


March 27, 2003

                                            /s/ Kim D. Thorpe
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. and will be retained by FPIC Insurance
  Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
  staff upon request.
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-6566, styled State v. Jason Miears, pending in the 379th

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00785-CR

IN RE Jason MIEARS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 16, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 8, 2009, relator Jason Miears filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a

motion for temporary relief. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus, the motion for temporary relief, and all other relief requested is DENIED. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Certificate of Trust of RJF Capital Trust II



 EXHIBIT 4.19 
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 The undersigned, the trustees of RJF Capital Trust II,
desiring to form a statutory trust pursuant to Delaware Statutory Trust Act, 12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq. (the “Act”), hereby certify as follows: 
  

	 	(a)	The name of the statutory trust being formed hereby (the “Trust”) is “RJF Capital Trust II.” 

  

	 	(b)	The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows: 

 BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware 
 White Clay Center, Route 273 
 Newark, DE 19711 
  

	 	(c)	This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of filing. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act. 
 Dated:
May 28, 2009 
  

			
		 	   /s/ Paul C. Reilly

	Name:	 	Paul C. Reilly
	Title:	 	Regular Trustee
		
		 	   /s/ Jeffrey E. Trocin

	Name:	 	Jeffrey E. Trocin
	Title:	 	Regular Trustee
	
	BNY MELLON TRUST OF DELAWARE, as Delaware Trustee
		
	By:	 	   /s/ Kristine K. Gullo

	Name:	 	Kristine K. Gullo
	Title:	 	Vice President
Exhibit 10.1
    

    

    

    
      Effective May 26, 2009, each of the following executive officers has
      agreed to modify their existing employment agreements as follows:
    

    
      a.                               Frank Basirico, Jr., Chief Executive
      Officer
    

    
      (i)       10% annual base salary reduction from $290,000 to $261,000; and
    

    
      (ii)      forego receipt of a 50,000 share stock option (agreed upon
      with the Bank but not yet implemented)
    

    
      b.                              Martin E. Plourd, President/Chief
      Operating Officer
    

    
      (iii)     10% annual base salary reduction from $250,000 to $225,000; and
    

    
      (iv)      forego receipt of a 50,000 share stock option
    

    
      Effective May 26, 2009, the following agreements were terminated at the
      request of each officer/party to his respective agreement.
    

    
    	
           
        	
          
            Officer/Party
          

        	
           
        	
          
            Agreement Terminated
          

        
	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	
          
            James W. Andrews
SEVP/Chief Credit Officer
          

        	

        	
          
            Executive Supplemental Compensation Agreement effective as of
            December 29, 2006, as amended, that provided for $100,000 per year
            for 15 years at age 65.
          

        
	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	
          
            Frank Basirico, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
          

        	

        	
          
            Executive Supplemental Compensation Agreement effective as of
            December 29, 2006, as amended that provided for $100,000 per year
            for 15 years at age 65.
          

        
	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	

        	
          Martin E. Plourd
        	

        	
          
            Executive Supplemental Compensation Agreement President/Chief
            Operating Officer effective as of December 29, 2006, as amended
            that provided for $100,000 per year for 15 years at age 65.
          

        


    

    
      These agreement terminations, along with the termination of other
      supplemental compensation agreements with other officers of the Bank,
      will add approximately $818,000 (less applicable taxes) to the Bank’s
      capital and will cause the accrual of approximately $364,000 (without
      consideration of any tax consequences) per year to cease.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2022

No. 04-22-00306-CR

EX PARTE Michael Omar LOPEZ

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR1981-W5

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on August 3, 2022.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of August, 2022.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
#### Thomas J. Meade, Respondent, v. Agnes Rice Preston, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that questions of fact were presented for the jury to determine, and that the objection that the plaintiff was not a licensed plumber was not presented on the trial and hence was waived.

All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2370 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2370

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in New 
  York City, New York, as the ``Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in New York City, 
New York, shall be known and designated as the ``Daniel Patrick 
Moynihan United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel Patrick 
Moynihan United States Courthouse.

            Passed the Senate May 4, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2370

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in New 
  York City, New York, as the ``Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States 
                             Courthouse''.
```
Received:8306347711

JAN-21-2015 15:E8 FROM:MINI MRRT S30S347711

Jan 21 2015 03:14cm POCI2

TO:121033527G2 P.S'3

III

?t

(/

rfk
Received:8306347711

JPN-21-2015 15:29 FROM:MINI MART »4 8306347711

Jan 21 2015 03:15pm P003

TO:12103352762 P.3'3

flnna/i //) JJcJ^y/r

Z^^2^
Received:8306347711

JfiN-El-2015 15:28 FROM:MINI MART »4 8306347711

Jan 21 2015 03:14pra

TO:12103352762

P001

P. 1'3

SANDEGDRYAN

MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANOELINI

MARIALYNDARNARD

RHUKCA MARTINEZ

PATRICIA ALVARUZ

LUZ ELENA CHAPA

PLACK (VACANT)

JUSTICKS

COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH COURT OK APPEALS DISTRICT

CADUNA-lll-EVES JUSTlce CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS 782OJ-3O37

WWW TXCOURTS OOV/4THCOA ASPX

KF.ITH G. MOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELliHIIUNE

010) 335-263

FACSIMILE NO

(210)335-2762

January 9.2015

Kristi Rene Nix

P.O. Box 293123

Kerrville, TX 78029

M. Patrick Maguire

M. Patrick Maguire, P.C.

945 Barnclt Si.

Kerrville, TX 78028

DELIVERED VIA E-MATL

Scott Monroe

District Attorney 198th Judicial

District

402 Clearwater Paseo

Suite 500

Kerrville, TX 78028

DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-13-00569-CR

Trial Court Case Number: Bl 1614

Style: Kristi Rene Nix

v.

The State of Texas

Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has

issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Carmen De Leon

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53262
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

We consent to the use in this Form 10-K of Talton Holdings, Inc. of our report
dated April 4, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of AmeriTel Pay
Phones, Inc. as of November 30, 1996 and for the eleven months ended November
30, 1996; and our report dated April 4, 1997 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Talton Telecommunications Corporation as of November 30,
1996, and for the eleven months ended November 30, 1996; all appearing in this
Form 10-K.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 31, 1998
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11435

ROLAND BLOYCE CARROLL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(96-CV-798)

February 18, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roland Bloyce Carroll, proceeding pro se, appealsthe denial of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 petition for habeas corpus. Carroll seeks a remand in order that another
1

In light of Lindh v. Murphy, 117 S.Ct. 2059 (1997), we construe the certificate of

appealability as a certificate of probable cause.

2

 28 U.S.C. § 455.

2

federal district judge might consider his habeas petition after he has an opportunity

to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Carroll asserts, and

the record reflects, that the district judge a` quo was the state trial judge who, after

a bench trial, found Carroll guilty of the offense of aggravated sexual assault, the

offense underlying the instant habeas action.

A magistrate judge reviewed Carroll’s petition and recommended that relief

be denied. Carroll had until October 29, 1996 to file objections to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. On October 21, 1996, however, the district court adopted

the magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation and entered judgment

denying Carroll’s petition. Carroll timely appealed and we granted a certificate of

appealability.1

The question presented is not whether the district judge herein is impartial

in fact, but whether another might reasonably question his impartiality.2 We

entertain no doubt whatever that the trial judge inadvertently failed to recognize

this case or to recall his earlier participation as the state trial judge. The federal

habeas petition requires a review of the state court proceedings to determine if
3

Carroll’s conviction was obtained in violation of some constitutional right. Even

though resolution of the habeas case is based on a magistrate judge’s

recommendations, the federal judge must review the entire record and make the

ultimate determination whether to grant or deny relief. In this situation, it cannot

seriously be contended that there is no basisfor a reasonable person to question the

district judge’simpartiality and ability to provide the requisite independent federal

review of the state court proceedings.

Accordingly, we must conclude that our trial judge is disqualified to act

herein under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). We therefore vacate and remand for submission

to another federal district judge to consider the magistrate judge’s Findings and

Recommendation after Carroll is given a reasonable opportunity to file objections

thereto.

VACATED and REMANDED.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Percentage                            Jurisdiction or
Subsidiaries (a)                            of Ownership                        State of Incorporation
----------------                            ------------                        ----------------------
<S>                                             <C>                                <C>
City National Savings Bank, FSB                 100%                               United States

Parity Insurance Agency, Inc.(b)                100%                               Missouri

City National Real Estate, Inc.(c)              100%                               Missouri
</TABLE>



(a)    The operations of the Company's subsidiaries are included in the
       Company's consolidated financial statements.
(b)    Owned directly by City National Savings Bank, FSB.
(c)    Owned directly by Parity Insurance Agency, Inc.