97th Congress, 1st Session House Document No. 97-115

VETO OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 357

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OE THE UNITED STATES

VETOING

HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 357, A JOINT RESOLUTION MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE 

FISCAL YEAR 1982, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

November 23 (legislative day, November 20), 1981.—Message and accompanying joint resolution referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered to be printed

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON: 1981

12-028 0 — 83-----1 (Pt. 1) BLR
To the House of Representatives: I am returning to the Congress without my signature II. J. Res. 357, the Continuing Resolution providing appropriations for Fiscal Year 1982. This Resolution presented me with a difficult choice: —Either to sign a budget-busting appropriations bill that would finance the entire Government at levels well above my recom­ mendations, and thus set bade our efforts to halt the excessive Government spending that lias fueled inflation and high interest rates, and destroyed investments for new jobs; —Or, to hold the line on spending with a veto, but risk interrup­ tion of Government activities and services. I have chosen the latter. The failure to provide a reasonable Reso­ lution means that some citizens may be inconvenienced and that there is a possibility of some temporary hardship. Nevertheless, a far greater threat to all Americans is the sustained hardship they will suffer by continuing the past budget-busting policies of big spending and big deficits. When reports came to us in September that spending and the deficit for Fiscal Year 1982 were rising, we took action to stem the tide. On September 24, I asked for a reduction of 12 percent in the appropriations for nearly all non-defense discretionary programs and a modest reduction in our planned program to strengthen the national defense. The 12 percent cut would have saved $8.5 billion— a significant contribution to reducing the deficit, but a modest sum in a budget which will total more than $700 billion. By refusing to make even this small saving to protect the American people against over-spending, the Congress has paved the way for higher interest rates and inflation, and a continued loss of investment, jobs and economic growth. At the same time, the Continuing Resolu­ tion fails to provide sufficient security assistance to allow America to meet its obligations. The practice of loading the budget with unnecessary spending—and then waiting until after the eleventh hour to pass a Continuing Reso­ lution on the assumption that it was safe from a Presidential veto— has gone on much too long. It is one of the principal reasons why the growth of Government spending is still not under control. For much of the past fiscal year, most of the domestic budget was funded in this manner—through a Continuing Resolution, without regular appropriations bills subject to Presidential approval or dis­ approval. These so-called stop-gap resolutions are actually budget- busters that can last for an entire year and create the kind of economic mess we inherited last year. A few days ago I offered to meet the Congress half-wa}7. But the Continuing Resolution the Congress has now passed provides less than

( i n )
IV

one-quarter of the savings T requested. This represents neither fair compromise nor responsible budget policy. In the hours ahead the Congress has the opportunity to reconsider, and I urgently request that it do so. In the meantime, we are making every effort to avoid unnecessary dislocations and personal hardship. I can give assurance th at: —Social Security and most other benefit checks will be paid on schedule. —The national security will be protected. —Government activities essential to the protection of life and prop­ erty, such as the treatment of patients in veterans hospitals, air traffic control and the functioning of the Nation’s banks, will also continue. But in order to prevent unnecessary inconvenience and hardship as Thanksgiving approaches, I must urge the Congress to act promptly and responsibly.

R onald Reagan.

T h e W h it e H ouse, November 23,1981.

H.J. Res. 357—22

S ec. 143. Notwithstanding any other provision of law or of this joint resolution, none of the funds appropriated by this joint resolu­ tion or by any other Act shall be obligated or expended to increase, after the date of enactment of this joint resolution, any salary of any Federal judge or Justice of the Supreme Court, except as may be specifically authorized by Act of Congress hereafter enacted: Pro­ vided further, That nothing in this limitation shall be construed to reduce any salary which may be in effect at the time of enactment of this joint resolution nor shall this limitation be construed in any manner to reduce the salary of any Federal judge or of any Justice of the Supreme Court.

T hom as P. O ’N eill, Jr., Speaker of the House of Representatives.

S trom T h u r m o n d,

President of the Senate pro tempore.

I certify that this Joint Resolution originated in the House of Representatives.

E d m u n d L. H e n s h a w, Jr.,Clerk. By T homas E. L add,

Assistant to the Clerk.