alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140108 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140108 

 COA: 292427 

Wayne CC: 06-002847-01; 

 06-011404-01 

KEVIN DELON YARBROUGH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 23.0
                                                                    ------------

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-27629) pertaining to The Publishing Company of North America, Inc.
1996 Stock Plan of our report dated February 25, 2000, except for Note 12, as to
which the date is March 6, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of The Publishing Company of North America, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Orlando, Florida
March 28, 2000
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Apex Resources Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, John Rask, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated this 22nd day of June, 2011  /s/ John RaskJohn RaskPresident, Principal Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer and a member of the
Board of Directors
1 Oliver requests thathis case be exchanged and transferred for refilin g pursuantto Rule 330 (e) of the Rules o f Civil Procedur e. Rule 330(e), h owever, d oes not a pply. NO. 07-04-0260-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL C SEPTEMBER 2, 2004

______________________________ ELLERY CORNELIUS OLIVER, APPELLAN T

V. ZONIA A. SCOTT, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 91,42 8; HONORA BLE PAME LA C. SIR MON, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION Pending before this Court is appellant Ellery Corneliu s Oliver’s motion by which he requestswe dismiss this appeal. 1 Oliver, an inmat e proceedi ng pro se and informa2

pauperis , origina lly file d suit ag ainst ap pellee Z onia A. S cott in justice court where his claim was dismissed pursuant to chapter 14 of the Texas C ivil Practice and Remedies Code. After hisappeal to the Co unty Cou rt At Law No. 2 was dismissed for lack of prosecution, he appea led to th is Court. In his motion, Oliver indicates a desire to re-file hi s claim. Thus, be caus e the dismissal of his claim in county court was not a ruling on the merits, we dismiss this appeal without prejudic e. Cf. Hughes v. Massey, 65 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex.App.–Beaumont 2001, no pet.) (ho lding th at it waserr or to dism iss with prejudic e an inma te’s sui t for fail ure to comply w ith the ru les gove rning thefiling of in forma pauperis suits). Without passing on the mer it s of this appeal, pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal without prejudice. Having dismissed the appeal at Olive r’s request no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Don H. Reavis Justice
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with
the annual report of ICTS International, N.V. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2012 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ranaan Nir, Managing Director
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | By: | /s/ Raanan Nir
| | --- | --------------

Raanan Nir, Managing
Director and Principal Executive Officer





| | Dated: | May 13, 2013
| | ------ | ------------
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZ. R. SUP. CT. 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA
, Respondent
,

v.

RAYMOND ROJAS STEVENS
, Petitioner

.
N o . 1 CA

- CR 12

- 0747 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa Coun ty No. C R2006

- 146397

- 001 CR2010

- 138650

- 001 The Honorable Phemonia L. Miller
, Pro Tem

REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL
Arizona Attorney General , Phoenix By Joseph T. Maziarz Counsel for Respondent

Raymond Rojas Stevens
, Florence PetitionerSTATE v. STEVENS Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones deliver ed the decision of the Court, in which Judge Patricia A. Orozco and Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop joined.

J O N E S , Judge:

¶1 Petitioner Raymond Rojas Stevens petitions this court for review from the dis missal of his petition for post

- convict ion relief. Presiding Judge Orozco
, and Judges Winthrop and Jones have considered the petition for review and, for the reasons stated, grant review but deny relief.

¶2 In 2007, Stevens pled guilty to aggravated assault and the trial c ourt sentenced him to 2.5 years imprisonment. In 2011, Stevens pled guilty to aggravated DUI and the trial co urt sentenced him to five years imprisonment. As stipulated in the plea agreement, the trial court used Steven s 's prior aggravated assault conviction to enhance the DUI
sentence.
¶3 In August 2012, Stevens filed a pro se consolidated petition for post

- conviction relief in both cases. That petition for post

- conviction relief served as a time ly "of

- right" petition for post

- conviction relief in the DUI case, but was the first untimely petition he filed in the aggravated assault case. Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32.4(a) ( A defendant must initiate a Rule 32 of

- right proceeding within ninety days of the entry of judgment and
sentence

. ). The trial court dismissed the petition and Stevens now seeks review. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.9(c).

¶4 Giving Stevens the benefit of the doubt as to the issues properly presented for review, Stevens argues the trial court could not enhance the range of sentence for his DUI conviction with the prior conviction for aggravated assault because at some unidentified time, the trial court "dismissed" the aggravated assault case and/or conviction. We deny review. The record on review for the aggravated assault case establishes neither the charge nor the resulting conviction w as dismissed and Stevens provides no evidence to the contrary.STATE v. STEVENS Decision of the Court

3 ¶5 While the petition for review arguably presents additional issues, Stevens did n ot raise those issues in the petition for post

- conviction relief he filed below. A petition for review may not present issues not first presented to the trial court. State v. Bortz , 169 Ariz. 575, 577 , 821 P.2d 236, 238 (App. 1991); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32. 9(c)(1)(ii).

¶6 For the above reasons , we grant review and deny relief.
#### Leo Oppenheimer, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Frank Squier, Respondent, *v.*Carabaya Rubber and Navigation Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Herman D. Selleck, Defendant.

(No. 2.)

First Department,

July 7, 1911.

See head note in *Oppenheimer*v. *Carabaya Rubber & Wav. Co., Wo. 1 (ante,*p. 830). J

Appeal by the defendant, Carabaya Rubber and Navigation Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on. the 17th day of March, 1911, directing that the issues raised by the pleadings herein be sent to the Special Term for trial, and denying the said defendant’s motion for a stay.

*William, M. Bennett,*for the appellant.

*Abram I. Elhus,*for the respondent.

*836Per Curiam:

For the reasons given in *Oppenheimer*v. *Carabaya Rubber & Nav. Co., No. 1*(145 App. Div. 830), decided herewith, the order appealed from will be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.; Dowling, J., dissented.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted as indicated in opinion. . .
# Senate Freshmen Since Direct Election (1914)

**

----

This table counts Senate freshmen at the beginning of each Congress.  It includes appointments that occurred just before (November or December) or after (within one month) the opening of Congress.  It does not include special elections not held in November.  Additionally, it does not include those appointed earlier in the election year and then elected in November.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7002]

Pursuant to section 7088(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009 (Division H, Pub. L. 111-8) (“the Act”), and Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of section 7088(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic, and I hereby waive such restriction.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: May 5, 2010.

Jacob J. Lew,

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-11597 Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-46-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

K.C.B., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1008 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court forHillsborough County; Barbara TwineThomas, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2190

To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Blue 67.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7, 2000

Mr. EDWARDS (for himself and Mr. HELMS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Solvent Blue 67.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON SOL4 VENT BLUE 67.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.00 Solvent Blue 67

(CAS No.

81457–65–0)

(provided for in

subheading

3204.19.11) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.
2

•S 2190 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Hall, Kinion & Associates, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 29, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Martin A. Kropelnicki, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


                                                   /s/ Martin A. Kropelnicki
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                       Martin A. Kropelnicki
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 31, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Hall, Kinion & Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Hall,
Kinion & Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FiberTower Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt J. Van Wagenen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Dated:
March 13, 2009

/s/ KURT J. VAN WAGENEN Kurt J. Van Wagenen Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.

---
ACTIONS OF THE AUGUST 28, 2013, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the Smithsonian Institution’s budget request for appropriated funds for 

fiscal year 2015 for presentation to the Office of Management and Budget. Any material 

changes in program plans incorporated into this budget shall be made only with the approval of 

the Board of Regents or its Executive Committee. [2013.08.01]

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Regent 

Bylaw 3.01, approves the proposed nomination of Michael E. Tennenbaum to the Regents’ 

Investment Committee and requests that the Chancellor make the necessary appointment. 

[2013.08.02]

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board 

Bylaw 3.01, appoints Joseph P. Allen IV, Thomas W. Haas, and John Suttle to the Board of the 

National Air and Space Museum for three-year terms effective October 1, 2013. [2013.08.03]
#### Edward L. Riker and Others, Plaintiffs, v. The Manchester Assurance Company of Manchester, England, Defendant.

Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled, motion for new trial denied, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant upon the nonsuit, with costs.

All concurred.
# Women Senators

**

----

To date, 60 women have served in the United States Senate, with 25 serving at this time (indicated in bold print below). Visit Women of the Senate to learn more about the impact of women on the Senate.

Women in Congress (U.S. House of Representatives)

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Women of the Senate 

           Explore the important and evolving role of the Women of the Senate.

### Historical Highlights 

A Vote for Women

First Woman Senator

A Woman Presides over the Senate

First Woman Elected to Both Houses of Congress

A Declaration of Conscience

### Women Senators 

Former Senators

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
# States in the Senate | Kentucky

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Mitch McConnell (R)***Hometown: Louisville*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Rand Paul (R)***Hometown: Bowling Green*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Kentucky became the 15th state to join the Union on June 1, 1792. Kentucky’s first two senators, John Brown and John Edwards, were elected on June 18, 1792, and were seated on November 5, 1792. Kentucky’s longest-serving senators include Wendell Ford (1974–1999) and Mitch McConnell (1985–present). Among those who rose to leadership positions are John Brown and John Pope, both of whom served as the Senate’s president pro tempore, and Alben Barkley and Mitch McConnell, who served as Democratic floor leader and Republican floor leader, respectively. In 2023 McConnell became the longest-serving party leader in Senate history. As vice president, both Barkley and John C. Breckinridge became the Senate’s constitutional president, or presiding officer.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
WEBMD CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of WebMD Corporation (WebMD) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin
J. Wygod, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of WebMD, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                         
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of WebMD.

|                      |  |                                                                                        |  | 
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: March 26, 2003 |  | /s/ Martin J. WygodMartin J. Wygod
Chairman of the Board and
  Chief Executive Officer



---

The foregoing certification is being furnished to accompany WebMD Corporations
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the
Report) solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not be deemed filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any other
filing of WebMD Corporation that incorporates the Report by
reference. A signed original of this written certification required
by Section 906 has been provided to WebMD Corporation and will be
retained by WebMD Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.