alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000744106
<NAME> FEDDERS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            AUG-31-1997             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 MAY-31-1997             MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                 0                   7,528
<SECURITIES>                           0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0                  70,490
<ALLOWANCES>                           00                 (2,984)
<INVENTORY>                            0                  90,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0                 173,754
<PP&E>                                 0                 121,508
<DEPRECIATION>                         0                (58,237)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         0                 305,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  0                 101,942
<BONDS>                                0                  37,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0                       0
<PREFERRED>                            0                   7,514
<COMMON>                               0                  41,202
<OTHER-SE>                             0                 121,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           0                 305,275
<SALES>                          143,776                 237,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 143,776                 237,456
<CGS>                            112,934                 185,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    123,155                 214,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0                   (457)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (1,468)                 (2,782)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   19,153                  21,069
<INCOME-TAX>                       6,513                   7,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               12,640                  13,905
<DISCONTINUED>                        0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0                       0
<CHANGES>                             0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                      12,640                  13,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.30                    0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.27                    0.29
        

</TABLE>
#### John C. R. Johnson, Appellant, v. Charles P. Blaney, Respondent.

Order .affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 Rentrak Corporation 
 Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors

 Each non-employee director of Rentrak Corporation (“Rentrak”) receives an annual retainer of $30,000. In addition, the chair
of the Compensation Committee receives a $3,000 annual retainer, the chair of the Audit Committee receives a $5,000 annual retainer, and each other non-employee director who serves on the Audit Committee receives a $2,500 annual retainer.
Non-employee directors are also paid $1,200 for each board or committee meeting they attend in person or by telephone conference call. Rentrak also reimburses directors for their travel expenses for each meeting attended in person. 
 In accordance with the provisions of Rentrak’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan approved by the shareholders at the 2005 annual meeting, the Board of
Directors has approved the award of 9,000 deferred stock units (“DSUs”) to each non-employee director each year beginning in 2006. The DSUs represent the right to receive an equal number of shares of Rentrak’s Common Stock pursuant to
the terms and conditions of the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan on a deferred basis in compliance with the terms of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The DSU awards granted in 2006 and 2007 vested on the one-year anniversary of
the grant date, while DSUs granted in 2008 and 2009 vest in three equal annual installments beginning one year after the grant date, in each case so long as the recipient continues to be a non-employee director on the vesting date. The DSUs also
vest in full upon termination of the recipient’s service on the Board due to death or disability or a change in control of Rentrak. Vested DSU awards become payable following the recipient’s ceasing to be a director of Rentrak.
No. 1,960.

#### STATE Respondent, *v.*STICKNEY, Appellant.

*Appeal from District*Court, *Cascade County; J. B.*Leslie, *Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided October 6, 1903.

*Messrs. Dowmng &*Stephenson, for Appellant.

*Mr. James*Donovan, *Attorney*General, for the State.

Pee Cueiam.

Upon motion of the respondent this appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Me. Justice MilbueN dissents to that part of the order which dismisses the appeal.
# Hattie Wyatt Caraway: A Featured Biography

**

----

Appointed to the Senate in 1931, Hattie Caraway (D-AR) filled a vacancy caused by the death of her husband, Thaddeus Caraway. The second woman to serve in the Senate, Caraway became the first woman *elected* to the Senate in January of 1932, easily winning a special election to fill out the remainder of her husband's term. Most considered her a long shot for the general election of 1932, however, so "Silent Hattie" enlisted the help of controversial senator Huey P. Long of Louisiana to bolster her campaign. The highly publicized "Hattie and Huey" tour through Arkansas resulted in a landslide victory for Caraway. Reelected in 1938, she served until 1945. Hattie Caraway broke many gender barriers in the Senate, including becoming the first woman to chair a Senate committee in 1933 and the first woman to preside officially over the Senate in 1943.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Hattie Wyatt Caraway

### Photograph Exhibit 

Hattie Caraway
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000742686
<NAME> DALTEX MEDICAL SCIENCES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                          93,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,432
<PP&E>                                          56,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                (55,903)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          817,999
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,327
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,816,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,550
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,724
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  210,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,371)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

Assigned on Briefs September 11, 2007

PAUL HAYES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County

No. P-27839 Paula Skahan, Judge

No. W2006-02344-CCA-R3-PC - Filed January 23, 2008

The petitioner, Paul Hayes, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal,

he contends that the trial court erred in denying his petition for relief but provides no proof of

ineffective assistance of counsel. Therefore, the judgment from the post-conviction court is

affirmed.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Criminal Court Affirmed

JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which DAVID H. WELLES and

ALAN E. GLENN, JJ., joined.

William Anderson, Jr., Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Paul Hayes. 

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter; Lacy Wilber, Assistant Attorney General;

William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; and Anita Spinetta, Assistant District Attorney

General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

OPINION

The petitioner, Paul Hayes, was convicted of aggravated burglary and two counts of

aggravated robbery and received an effective seventy-five-year sentence. He appealed his

convictions, and they were affirmed by this court. State v. Paul Hayes, No. W2001-02637-CCA-R3-

CD, 2002 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 1043, at *2 (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 6, 2002). He filed a petition

for post-conviction relief, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in nine areas.

Following a hearing, the post-conviction court found that counsel provided effective assistance and

that no relief was warranted.

On appeal, the petitioner argues that the post-conviction court erred in concluding he did not

receive ineffective assistance of counsel. However, in his brief, he does not provide any citations

to the record nor does he provide any authority to bolster his conclusion. Our review of the

petitioner’s brief reflects that he has failed to adequately brief the issues. A petitioner waives an
-2-

issue when he fails to adequately brief the issue. State v. Schaller, 975 S.W.2d 313, 318 (Tenn.

Crim. App. 1997).

Here, the petitioner has outlined case law that demonstrates how to show ineffective

assistance of counsel and then states his position that the totality of circumstances in this case

reflects that the level of representation he received was not sufficient. He does not cite to the record

or the post-conviction proceeding to give any example or argument as to how his counsel was

ineffective. Quite simply, the petitioner has not shown how the post-conviction court erred in

denying his petition for post conviction relief. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

Conclusion

Based on the foregoing and the record as a whole, we affirm the judgment from the postconviction court. 

 ___________________________________

 JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7484

LEVI BROWN, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-948-2-21)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Levi Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Levi Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Brown v. South Carolina, No. CA-98-948-2-21

(D.S.C. Sept. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# States in the Senate |Alabama Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

 1. Withdrew from the Senate Jan. 21, 1861. Seat declared vacant Mar. 14, 1861. Because of Civil War, vacancy from Jan. 21, 1861, to July 22, 1868, following Alabama’s readmission to representation on July 13, 1868.

 2. By legislature, to fill vacancy in term beginning Mar. 4, 1865. Seated July 25, 1868.

 3. Not sworn in until Jan. 15, 1872, because of contested election.

 4. Withdrew from the Senate Jan. 21, 1861. Because of Civil War, vacancy from Jan. 21, 1861, to July 20, 1868, following Alabama’s readmission to representation on July 13, 1868.

 5. By legislature to fill vacancy in term beginning Mar. 4, 1867. Seated July 25, 1868.

 6. Vacancy from Aug. 8, 1913, to May 11, 1914. Henry D. Clayton was appointed by the governor on Aug. 12, 1913, to fill vacancy; credentials withdrawn, Oct. 21, 1913. Frank P. Glass was appointed by the governor on Nov. 17, 1913, but by Senate resolution, Feb. 4, 1914, was declared not entitled to a seat. White subsequently won a special election to the seat.

 7. Elected for the term commencing Jan. 3, 1981; subsequently appointed by the governor on Jan. 2, 1981, to fill the vacancy for the term ending Jan. 3, 1981.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                             CityFed Financial Corp.
              Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss




                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                            ------------------
                                                                 March 31,
                                                                 ---------

                                                         2001              2000
                                                         ----              ----
<S>                                                     <C>                <C>

 Computation of Loss Per Share:


 Weighted average number of shares outstanding           18,715,609         18,715,609

 Loss applicable to common stock:1


   From continuing operations                           $(2,132,000)       $(2,082,000)

   From discontinued operations                         $        -         $(1,037,000)
                                                        -----------        -----------

   Net loss                                             $(2,132,000)       $(3,119,000)
                                                        ===========        ===========

 Basic and diluted loss per share:


   From continuing operations                           $     (0.11)       $     (0.11)

   From discontinued operations                         $  (     - )       $     (0.06)
                                                        -----------        -----------
   Net loss                                             $     (0.11)       $     (0.17)
                                                        ===========        ===========
</TABLE>


--------
1 Losses applicable to Common Stock are net of preferred stock dividends for the
three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000 in the amount of $2,159,000.
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally

disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may

be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal.. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 1 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

HANS G. PRESSEL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. No. 97-1204

MARK MCKINNA and the,

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents-Appellees.

(D.C. No. 96-Z-2474)

(D.Colo.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

 

Petitioner, appearing pro se, appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his petition

for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our jurisdiction arises under 28
2

U.S.C. § 2253. We grant petitioner’s application for a certificate of appealability and

affirm. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). 

Petitioner pleaded guilty to theft and is currently serving an eight-year sentence in

Colorado state prison. Petitioner appealed his sentence to the Colorado court of appeals. 

The court of appeals affirmed his sentence, and petitioner did not file a petition for

certiorari to the Colorado Supreme Court. In August 1996, petitioner filed a motion for

post-conviction relief which the trial court subsequently denied. Petitioner did not appeal

the denial. On October 24, 1996, petitioner filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus

in the district court. As grounds for relief, petitioner claims that (1) there was insufficient

evidence to support his conviction; (2) his guilty plea was involuntary; (3) he received

ineffective assistance of counsel; and (4) he was subject to cruel and unusual punishment. 

The district court referred the matter to a magistrate judge for recommendation. The

district court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed the petition

without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. 

We have reviewed petitioner’s brief and the entire record before us and agree with

the decision of the district court. A state prisoner, absent exceptional circumstances, may

not obtain federal habeas corpus relief unless all available and adequate state court

remedies have been exhausted. Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 515 (1982); Dever v.

Kansas State Penitentiary, 36 F.3d 1531, 1534 (10th Cir. 1994). The exhaustion

requirement is satisfied if the issue has been presented to the highest state court, either by
3

direct review or in a post-conviction motion. Dever, 36 F.3d at 1535. In this case, as

outlined above, petitioner failed to exhaust his state court remedies. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 1, 2017

s0228

Order 

Clerk

March 1, 2017

155289 & (10)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155289

COA: 336431

Ingham CC: 13-000311-FH

JASON NICHOLAS TERRILL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
(logo) HOMESIDE
       LENDING, INC.



March 26, 1997

Ms. Tracey A. Waldman
Servicer Compliance Supervisor
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
I 1000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562

Re:  Officer's Certificate
     Calendar Year Ending December 31, 1996

Dear Ms. Waldman:

As an officer of HomeSide Lending, Inc. (HomeSide),  I certify to the best of my
knowledge on behalf of the loans HomeSide  services for Norwest Bank  Minnesota,
N.A. as to the following:

1.  I have  reviewed  the  activities  and  performance  of HomeSide  during the
    preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement and to the
    best of this officer's knowledge,  HomeSide has fulfilled all of its duties,
    responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement throughout  such  year;
2.  I have  confirmed  that  HomeSide  is  currently  an  approved FNMA or FHLMC
    Servicer in good standing; 
3.  I  have  confirmed that the fidelity bond and errors and omissions insurance
    policy required under  the Servicing  Agreement is in full force and effect;
4.  All premiums for each hazard  insurance  policy,  flood insurance policy (if
    applicable) and PMI policy (if  applicable),  with respect to each mortgaged
    property,  have been paid and that all such  insurance  policies are in full
    force and effect;
5.  All real estate taxes,  governmental  assessments and other expenses accrued
    and due,  that if not paid  could  result  in a lien or  encumbrance  on any
    mortgaged property, have been paid;
6.  All custodial accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and




     Post Office BOX 44090, Jacksonville, FL 32231-4090  904-281-3000
                                                                          (logo)
                                                                   Equal Housing
                                                                          Lender
(logo) HOMESIDE
       LENDING, INC.


7.  All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
    required  per  Section  6050J  and  6050P  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code,
    respectively, have been prepared and filed.

HomeSide  has  recently  renewed  its errors and  omissions  and  fidelity  bond
coverage.  An Evidence of  Insurance  form will be sent to the  attention of Ms.
Kimberly  Ferrel within ten days. You have previously been advised of our change
of fiscal year end to the twelve month  period  ending the last day of February.
The audited financial  statements with  accompanying  audit letters will be sent
within 90 days of our new fiscal year end, also to the attention of Ms. Ferrel.

Finally, enclosed is the completed Servicer Information form as supplied by you.
Should you have any questions please contact Lynda M. Pohwat at (904)281-4705.



Sincerely,

/s/ Terry Salazar
Terry Salazar
Vice President

lp
enc.
Exhibit 32



Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual Report of Hall, Kinion & Associates on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 28, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:

/S/    BRENDA C. RHODESBrenda C. Rhodes Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/S/    MARTIN A. KROPELNICKIMartin A. Kropelnicki Chief Financial Officer






Date: April 5, 2004