alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2




Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (“Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date: March 4, 2011
 
 /s/ JOEL M. BENNETTJOEL M. BENNETTChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 & 4 OF THE COMPANY'S 10Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,935,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,046,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,790,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,197,687
<PP&E>                                       3,960,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,186,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,113,709
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       231,628
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,948,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,186,946
<SALES>                                      9,240,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,240,921
<CGS>                                        5,645,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,645,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,896,666
<INCOME-TAX>                                   741,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,155,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,155,666
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
Applied Signal Technology, Inc.
  Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
    Report of Applied Signal Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
    the period ended August 1, 2008, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William B. Van
  Vleet III , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ William B. Van Vleet III 
--------------------------------------------- | Date:
          September 8, 2008
-------------------------------
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|William B. Van Vleet III
        President and Chief Executive Officer      |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20717

FORUM SUBSEA RENTALS, formerly known as DPS Offshore, 

Incorporated, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

TAREK A. ELSHARHAWY; SHELLY L. ELSHARHAWY, also known as 

Shelly L. Chilman; GLOBALTECH OFFSHORE, 

 Defendants - Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CV-885

Before PRADO, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court has considered this appeal on the basis of the briefs, the oral 

arguments of counsel, and pertinent portions of the record. The judgment of 

the district court is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the district 

court in its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law issued on September 17, 

2014, after the bench trial. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 22, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-20717 Document: 00513353469 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2016
No. 14-20717

2

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-20717 Document: 00513353469 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Railroad Administration

          - [Docket No. FRA-2000-7257; Notice No. 61]

# AGENCY:

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Announcement of Charter Renewal of the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC).

# SUMMARY:

FRA announces the charter renewal of the RSAC, a Federal Advisory Committee that develops railroad safety regulations through a consensus process. This charter renewal will take effect on May 17, 2010, and will expire after 2 years.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry Woolverton, RSAC Administrative Officer/Coordinator, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6212; or Grady Cothen, Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6302.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), FRA is giving notice of the charter renewal for the RSAC. The RSAC was established to provide advice and recommendations to FRA on railroad safety matters. The RSAC is composed of 54 voting representatives from 31 member organizations, representing various rail industry perspectives. In addition, there are non-voting advisory representatives from the agencies with railroad safety regulatory responsibility in Canada and Mexico, the National Transportation Safety Board, and the Federal Transit Administration. The diversity of the Committee ensures the requisite range of views and expertise necessary to discharge its responsibilities. See the RSAC Web site for details on pending tasks at:                     *http://rsac.fra.dot.gov/​.*                     Please refer to the notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 11, 1996, 61 FR 9740, for additional information about the RSAC.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 7, 2010.

Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,

Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program Development.

[FR Doc. 2010-11382 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,246
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     79,071
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          37,071
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            36,974
<LOANS>                                        130,882
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 255,636
<DEPOSITS>                                     197,092
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,831
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,022
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,520
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 225,636
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,223
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,570
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    10
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,803
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,857
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,312
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,491
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   8
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,065
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,065
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,139
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       266
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,995
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,495
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        5
<RECOVERIES>                                        23
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,603
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,603
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          34,921                   5,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,695                   1,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                       308                      78
<INVENTORY>                                      3,845                   4,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,553                  11,965
<PP&E>                                          10,298                   4,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,482                   1,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,917                  15,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,097                   8,328
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        66,717                   1,626
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,443)                (20,706)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,917                  15,581
<SALES>                                         44,069                   6,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,069                   6,390
<CGS>                                           22,611                   5,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,611                   5,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,802                  16,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   308                      78
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,714)                (14,751)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,714)                (14,751)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)                  (1.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)                  (1.52)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12.1

                       EVANS WITHYCOMBE RESIDENTIAL, L.P.
                   CALCULATION OF THE RATIO OF DEBT TO MARKET
                     CAPITALIZATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997
                     (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT FOR UNITS
                             AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                                     <C>
Issued and outstanding Units                                                                 24,978,056
Exchange ratio of 0.50 share of common stock of Equity Residential Properties Trust (1)            0.50
                                                                                                   ----
Equivalent number of issued and outstanding shares                                           12,489,028
Closing price of stock at December 31, 1997                                                     $50.875
Equity Capitalization                                                                      $635,379,300
Debt                                                                                       $499,000,000
Total Capitalization                                                                     $1,134,379,300
Debt/Total Capitalization                                                                          44.0%
</TABLE>



(1)  The Asset  Contribution  Agreement  dated August 27, 1997  provides for the
     exchange of all outstanding  limited partnership units at an exchange ratio
     of  0.50   units/shares  of  EQR  for  every  one  unit  of  the  Operating
     Partnership.
Order filed January 28 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00763

- CR

____________ VINCENT JOHN ZAHORIK , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MD

- 0322640



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Anthony P. Griffin. The reporter’s record in this appeal was due October 21, 2013. Jana Fowler, the official court reporter, filed a partial reporter’s record on November 20, 2013 . Tara Wilson, the substitute court reporter who reported the remainder of the case
, informed this court that appellant had not made full paym ent for the remainder of the reporter’s record. On December 30, 2013 , the clerk of this court not ified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a complete reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of the notice, providedthis court with pr oof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). On

Januar y 21, 2014, Tara Wilson notified the court t hat the amount owing for payment for the remainder of the record remains outstanding.
Accordingly, we issue the following order:
Appellant is ordered to provide this court with proof of payment for preparation of the remainder of the record on or before Feb ruary 2 4, 2014. If appellant fails to comply, the court will require appellant to file a brief with the benefit of only a partial reporter’s record and the court will consider and decide those issues that do not require a complete reporter’s record. If the remainder of the record is not filed , appellant’s appeal will be decided on a partial record.

PER CURIAM
##### 



Exhibit 21
 CARBO CERAMICS INC.
SUBSIDIARIES
 JURISDICTION OF
    
    PERCENTAGENAME OF ENTITY
    
    ORGANIZATION
    
    OWNEDCARBO Ceramics (UK) Limited
    
    Scotland
    
    
    100
    %CARBO Ceramics Mauritius Inc.
    
    Mauritius
    
    
    100
    %CARBO LLC
    
    Delaware, USA
    
    
    100
    %CARBO Ceramics (China) Company Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100
    %CARBO Ceramics Cyprus Ltd.
    
    Cyprus
    
    
    100
    %CARBO Ceramics (Eurasia) LLC
    
    Russia
    
    
    100
    %Pinnacle Technologies, Inc.
    
    California, USA
    
    
    100
    %Pinnacle
Technologies (Delft) BV
    
    The Netherlands
    
    
    100
    %Pinnacle Technologies (Canada) Inc.
    
    Canada
    
    
    100
    %Applied Geomechanics Incorporated
    
    California, USA
    
    
    100
    %Enertech, Ltd.
    
    Canada
    
    
    49
    %Davidson Energy, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USA
    
    
    32
    %
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Texas Mutual Insurance Company,

 

 Appellant,

v.

Anita Dejaynes, Individually and as Next 

friend of Alysse Dejaynes, Noah Matthew 

Dejaynes, and Emma Michelle Dejaynes, 

Minor Children,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00147-CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Ward County, Texas 

(TC# 15-12-23771-CVW)

O R D E R

The notice of appeal was received and filed in this office on August 20, 2018. The final 

judgment does not reflect the date it was signed by the trial court judge. See TEX.R.CIV.P. 306a(2). 

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Honorable Mike Swanson, Judge of the 143rd District Court of 

Ward County, Texas, enter a nunc pro tunc final judgment reflecting the date on which the 

judgment was previously signed. The nunc pro tunc final judgment shall be filed with the District 

Clerk of Ward County, Texas, and the District Clerk shall include said nunc pro tunc final 

judgment in the clerk’s record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of August, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Remanded by Suprem

e Court March 4, 20

02

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEVEN LEE WHITEHEAD

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 99-152 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge

No. W2002-00484-CCA-RM-CD - Filed June 27, 2002

N ORMA M C G EE O GLE , J., dissenting.

Because I have no difficulty concl uding that the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury
on sexual battery constitutes harmless error according to the standard enunciated in State v. Allen , 69 S.W.3d 18 1, 191 (Te nn. 2002), I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s reversal of the appellant’s convictions of rape. As acknowledged by the majority, our supreme court emphasized-2-

in Allen that, “[w]hen a lesser-included offense instruction is improperly omitted, . . . the harmless
error inquiry is the same as for other constitutional errors” and entails an examination of both the evidence adduced

at trial and the defenda

nt’s theory of def

ense . Id. As also acknowledged by the majority, RB unequivocally testifie d at trial that the appellant’s sexual assault upon her included three separate acts of

sexual penetration, and her testimony was uncontradicted with the exception of the appellant’s s

tatements to the police denying an

y sexual activity w

hatsoever betwe

en himself and RB. In other words, the appellant’s defense in this case did not hinge upon the nature of the sexual activity betwee n himself and RB but rather upon whether any sexual activity occurred. Accor dingly, with respect to the evidence underlying each count of rape, the appellant was either guilty of the charged o

ffense or entirely innoc

ent. Under these

circumstances,

the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on sexual battery should not afford the appellant relief.

I note with inte

rest the majority’s quot

ation of the follow

ing language fro

m Allen , 69 S.W.3d at 189: “The jury is not required to believe any evidence offered by the State. . . . W e thereforecannot agree th

at the decision to

convict on a lesse

r-included offe

nse may be taken away from the jury whenever proof supporting t he element distinguishing the greater offense from the lesser offense is uncontroverted.” I also note that the majority extracted t his language f

rom that portion of the supreme court’s decision addressing the issue of when a trial court should i

nstruct a jury on lesser-included offenses and not from that portion of the opinion add ressi ng the issue of when a trial court’s failure to do so constitutes harmless error. In short, I believe that the ma jority has overlooked a cr

itical distinction be

tween those

two issues, and I c

annot join in

the result thereby achieved.-3- ___________________________________ NORMA McGEE OGLE, JUDGE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132221 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132221 

 COA: 257728 

Otsego CC: 04-002999-FC 

THOMAS FRANK URBAN, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk