alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2192 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2192

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Cibacron Brilliant Blue FN-G.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2000

Mr. Edwards (for himself and Mr. Helms) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Cibacron Brilliant Blue FN-G.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CIBACRON, BRILLIANT BLUE FN-
              G.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.32.00    Cibacron          Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     Brilliant Blue                                                          31/2002          ''
                     FN-G (CAS No.                                                                             .
                     163062-28-0)
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     3204.16.30)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
R-115



# . OPPICE OP 

# THE Ar~0Rm 

# GENERAL

PRICE DANIEL AITORNBYGENrm.4L March 

### 6, 1947

Bon, Cecil Storey, Cheirman Crimlual Jurisprudence Committee House of Representatives Austin, Texas Opinion Ho. V-72 Re: Validity of House Bill Dear Sir: to.,220 50th Legiala-

. You request au offiuial .opinlon on the con-~ atltutiouallty of Bouse,Blll lo. 220, wblch bill %tself Is attached to your request. This bill is short, and we reproduce it in full aa follows: "A BIIL * "TOBEEIVTITIED ', "AHACTto amendTitle 5, Chapter 1,

of the Penal Code of Texas by adding thereto another article to be kuoun a8 Article 178b, and meking bribery of officials, players and participants in athletic contests a crime. %E IT REACTED

BYTRELEQISLATDRE OFTgE STATROFTEXAS: "Section 1. That Title 5, Chapter 1, of the Penal Code of Texas, be amended by adding thereto another ertlcle to be known as Article 

### 178b,eud to'read as follows: "'Article 178b. Whoever shell bribe or attempt to bribe any player 

### or partioipant in any athletic contest, or any official in any athletic coutest, whose action or nonaction might affect the result of such contest, with the intent to lnflu- 'ence or change the result or outcome of such sthletic contest, shall be confined ln the penitentiary for not less than two 

### nor more than five years,'". Hon. Cecil Storey - Page 2,,V-72

We think there is great doubt as to the validity of House Bill Ro. 220 in its present form for the Pollowlng reason9

.

The bill although creating the offense of bribery, does not define the term “bribe” or “bribery,” but makes the same a part of Title 5, Chspter 1, dealing with bribery.

In this chapter, the term “bribe,” is defined, but the definition there as given would’ not include the Persons mentioned In your bill, that Is, the. “officials, Players and particlpitants” In athletic contests; because such personsdo not perform “any duty, publlo or official,” as do the persons specifically namedin Article 177 of

’that ohapt,er. The bill, therefore, if enacted into law, might be stricken down for want of definitenes,s. ., ;;.- s We s’uggest that’.the, preferable. ,waywould be tb amend the bill - body and title - and create a new offense in which the word “bribe” Is specifically defined. Such a bill aa is suggested, if passed, would in our opinion be a valid law.

We.return tee bill herewith. j

. ; SUMMARY
.: 1. House .Bill Ro. 220 of the 50th Legislature proposing a newArticle to be added to Title 5, Chapter I, of the Penal Code to be numbered Article 178b, deallng with officials, players, and participants in athletic contests is’ probably uncoustitutiona 1. Y

2.’ such’ a bill proposing a new aud independent act defining the word “bribe, ‘” would be constitutiousl, and if passed would be valid law. Yours very truly

‘ATTORNEY

CRRRRAL

OF

OS/jbc /lh
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000865

06-JAN-2014

08:04 AM
The Chalone Wine Group, Ltd.


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Chalone Wine Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas B. Selfridge, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. * 1350, as adopted pursuant to * 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
           of the Company.


/s/ THOMAS B. SELFRIDGE
_____________________________________
Thomas B. Selfridge
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002


                                       20
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert B. Wagner, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Robert B. Wagner    |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Robert  B. Wagner        |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | March 1,  2010      |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial 
gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, SGS 
North America, Inc., 2301 Brazosport Blvd., Suite A 915, Freeport, TX 
77541, has been approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products for 
customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. 
Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding 
the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be 
directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 
344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d5e5f4d13515c5f554c7d59554e135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1a2a3b1efada0a3a9b081a5a9b2efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP 
approved gaugers and accredited laboratories:
     http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger 
became effective on February 17, 2010. The next triennial inspection 
date will be scheduled for February 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: May 12, 2010.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-12020 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Citadel  by William S. White 

**

----

        -  Virtual Reference Desk 
        -  Statistics & Lists 
        -  Bibliographies 
        -  How To... 
        -  Glossary 
        -  Senate Organization 
        -  The Constitution 
        -  Procurement 
        -  Employment & Internships 
        -            -  Senate Employment Office 
          -  Sergeant at Arms 
          -  Secretary of the Senate 
        -  Visiting
Exhibit
      10.16





Director
      Compensation





The
      following describes the various
      elements of our director compensation program.





Annual
      Board Retainers.An
      annual retainer of $60,000 is paid to each member of the Board of Directors
      who
      is not an employee of ours, subject to reduction as determined by the Board
      of
      Directors in the event a director is absent from more than 25% of the Board
      of
      Directors’ meetings during any calendar year.  The Chairman of the
      Board receives an additional annual Board fee of $25,000 and the Vice Chairman
      of the Board and the Immediate Past Chairman of the Board receives an additional
      annual Board fee of $6,000.





Annual
      Committee Retainers. Annual retainer
      fees to
      the nonemployee chairman of the committees of the Board of Directors are paid
      as
      follows:





ChairmanAudit
              
              $
              9,000Compensation
              
              $
              5,000Governance
              
              $
              2,500Executive
              
              
              —Nominating
              
              
              —All
                  Other
              
              $
              2,500





Fees
      for Off-Cycle Meetings.
      A fee of $650 is paid to each nonemployee member of the Board of Directors
      for
      attendance at any “Off-Cycle” meeting of the Board of Directors or any Committee
      of the Board of Directors (regardless of whether the Director is a member of
      that Committee).  “Off-Cycle” means (i) any meeting of the Board of
      Directors in excess of 5 meetings per year and (ii) any meeting of any Committee
      of the Board of Directors not coinciding with a regularly scheduled meeting
      of
      the Board of Directors.





Equity
      Compensation.Each
      nonemployee member of the Board of Directors receives on the date of each of
      our
      annual meetings of shareholders an award under our Amended and Restated Director
      Stock Plan (the “Director Stock Plan”) of 1,000 shares of restricted common
      stock, which fully vest on the first anniversary of the date of
      grant.  In addition, new nonemployee directors will receive on the
      date of their initial election to the Board of Directors an award under our
      Director Stock Plan of 1,000 shares of restricted common stock, which will
      fully
      vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.





Payment
      or Reimbursement for Reasonable Expenses.Reasonable
      expenses incurred by a director for attendance at meetings of the Board of
      Directors and its committees are paid or reimbursed by us.





Deferred
      Compensation Plan.We
      also offer our directors a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, under which
      directors may defer all or a portion of their fees earned as
      directors.  Under this plan, deferred fees will be paid, as adjusted
      for investment gains or losses, at such time in the future as specified by
      the
      participating director under the terms of the plan.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Apex Resources Group, Inc., on Form
        10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *"Report"* ),
        the
        undersigned, John Rask, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
                  February 7, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                  John R. RaskJohn
                  R.Rask, Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, C. A. Rundell, Jr., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Integrated Security Systems, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  November 21, 2005

/s/ C. A. RUNDELL, JR.

C. A. Rundell, Jr.,

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Executive and Financial Officer
463 A.2d 24

#### Commonwealth v. Ashford, Appellant.

Submitted April 26, 1983.

Thomas G. Klingensmith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Edward F. Browne, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before ROWLEY, WIEAND and POPOVICH, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11



                COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


                                                Year Ended         Year Ended
                                                December 31,       December 29,
                                                   1995               1996
                                               -------------      -------------
Weighted average number of issued
 shares outstanding                               2,079,029          4,027,517

Effect of:
 Dilutive effect of cheap stock after
  application of treasury
  stock method(1)                                   418,383             38,554
                                               -------------      -------------
Shares outstanding used to compute
 net income (loss) per share                      2,481,676          4,066,071
                                               -------------      -------------
Net income (loss)                              $ (1,104,078)       $  (703,592)
                                               -------------      -------------
Net income (loss) per common share             $      (0.45)       $     (0.17)
                                               -------------      -------------
--------------

(1)  Cheap stock and common shares issued during 1996 are included in the
     computation for all periods presented in accordance with Staff
     Accounting Bulletin Topic 4(D).





                                      39
94th Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 94-329

VETO OF THE COMMON SITUS PICKETING ACT

M ESSA G E

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

VETOING

H .R. 5900

AN ACT TO PROTECT THE ECONOMIC RIGHTS OF LABOR IN

THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY BY PROVIDING FOR EQUAL TREATMENT OF CRAFT AND INDUSTRIAL WORKERS AND TO ESTABLISH A NATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, AND FOR OTHER RELATED PURPOSES

J a n u a r y 19, 1976.— Message and accompanying act referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor and ordered to be printed

57-011 o

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 1976
To the House of Representatives: I am returning without my approval H.R. 5900, commonly known as the Common Situs Picketing Bill. The bill before me represents a combination of H.R. 5900, which would overturn the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the Denver Building Tracies case and the newly proposed Construction Industry Collective Bargaining Bill, S. 2305, as amended. During the development of this legislation, I stipulated that these two related measures should be considered together. The collective bargaining provisions have great merit. It is to the common situs picketing title that I address my objections. I had hoped that this bill would provide a resolution for the special problems of labor-management relations in the construction industry and would have the support of all parties. My earlier optimism in this regard was unfounded. My reasons for this veto focus primarily on the vigorous controversy surrounding the measure, and the possibility that this bill could lead to greater, not lesser, conflict in the construc­ tion industry. There are intense differences between union and nonunion contrac­ tors and labor over the extent to which this bill constitutes a fair and equitable solution to a long-standing issue. I have concluded that neither the building industry nor the Nation can take the risk that the bill, which proposed a permanent change in the law, will lead to loss of jobs and work hours for the construction trades, higher costs for the public, and further slowdown in a basic industry.

Gerald R. F ord.

T he W hite H ouse, January 2, 1076.

( i n )
# Golden Gavel Award

**

----

*U.S. Senate Historical Office*

The Senate "Golden Gavel" Award consists of a simple brass gavel.

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of MacroChem Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)   Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006
     as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "FORM 10-Q")
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

                                         /S/  BERNARD R. PATRIACCA
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Bernard R. Patriacca
                                         Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                         and Treasurer


Dated:    AUGUST 14, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MacroChem Corporation and will be retained by MacroChem Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       34