alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Roaming Messenger, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the "Report")
I, Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

(1) The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 9, 2005



                /s/ Jonathan Lei
                ------------------------------------------------------
                Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and
                Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Turner v. Wickliffe, Assignee of Farmers’ Bank of Wickliffe.

(Decided February 14, 1912.)

Appeal from Ballard Circuit Court.

Superse'deas — 'Failure to Issue .in Time — Motion for Damages — A supersedeas issued by the circuit clerk after the expiration of the time for filing the transcript in this court when the appeal bond was also executed before him after that time, is void and no damages will -be awarded on the 'dismissal of the appeal.

J. B. WIOKLIFFE for appellee.

*Opinion of*the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

On motion to dismiss appeal with damages.

Section 749 of tbe Code regulating supersedeas on appeals to this court is as follows:

> “Tbe bond must be executed before tbe clerk of tbe court rendering tbe judgment if tbe appeal be granted by that court. In other cases it must be executed before the clerk of tbe Court of Appeals.

> “Tbe clerk of tbe court rendering tbe judgment shall issue tbe supersedeas if tbe bond be executed before him before tbe expiration of the time for filing a copy of tbe record in tbe clerk’s office of tbe Court of Appeals, pursuant to Section 738. In other cases it must be issued by tbe clerk of tbe Court of Appeals.”

This appeal was granted September 6, 1911. Tbe time for filing tbe record in this court expired in December, 1911. Tbe bond was executed before tbe clerk of tbe Circuit Court on February 5, 1912, and tbe su-persedeas was issued by him on tbe. same day. He bad no power then to issue *a,-*supersedeas. He bad power then to take tbe bond, but tbe supersedeas could properly then be issued only by tbe clerk of this court. The *777•supersedeas being issued without authority was void and did not suspend the execution of the judgment. No damages can therefore be awarded.

The motion to dismiss the appeal with costs is sustained, the transcript not having been filed in time; but the motion for ten per cent damages is overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         3,293
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 35,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,337
<INVENTORY>                                   38,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              78,910
<PP&E>                                        91,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               280,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         34,239
<BONDS>                                      183,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    20,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 280,700
<SALES>                                      275,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             275,715
<CGS>                                        238,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                238,365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 531
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            18,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (43,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (8,255)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (35,056)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (35,056)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alfa Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|        |   |           |   |
|--------|--------|----------------|--------|
|   |   | Date: 11/13/02 |   |   | /S/ STEPHEN G. RUTLEDGE |
|        |        |                |        |     Name: **Stephen G. Rutledge**    Title: **Chief Financial Officer**  |
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00173-CV

Appellant, World Access Telecommunications Group, Inc.//Cross-Appellants, Statewide

Calling, Inc. d/b/a Community Services; Statewide LJR; Statewide Bulverde; Statewide

McAllen; and Mike Fine

v.

Appellees, Statewide Calling, Inc. d/b/a Community Services; Statewide LJR; Statewide

Bulverde; Statewide McAllen; and Mike Fine//Cross-Appellee, World Access

Telecommunications Group, Inc.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2002-729-C, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

World Access Telecommunications Group, Inc. (World Access), has filed a motion

to dismiss the cross appeal filed by Statewide Calling, Inc. d/b/a Community Services; Statewide

LJR; Statewide Bulverde; Statewide McAllen; and Mike Fine (collectively, Statewide). In response,

Statewide filed a motion to extend the time for filing their notice of appeal. Because Statewide

provided a reasonable explanation for its late filing, we grant the extension of time and overrule

World Access’s motion to dismiss. See Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 887 (Tex. 2003);

Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616-17 (Tex. 1997). 

The parties have also filed a joint motion to stay the proceedings until October 17,

2005. They inform us that the stay is sought for the purpose of enabling the parties to negotiate and
2

settle the case. The motion is granted. The appeal is abated until October 17, 2005. If the matter

has not been settled, World Access’s brief shall be filed with this Court on or before October 31,

2005. 

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Filed: September 12, 2005
**Exhibit 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

ALFA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES 

(As of March 31, 2006) 

Alfa Corporation (a Delaware corporation)

Alfa Life Insurance Corporation (an Alabama corporation) 

Alfa Insurance Corporation (an Alabama corporation) 

Alfa General Insurance Corporation (an Alabamacorporation) 

Alfa Vision Insurance Corporation (an Alabama corporation) 

Alfa Agency Mississippi, Inc. (a Mississippi corporation) 

Alfa Agency Georgia, Inc. (a Georgia corporation) 

Alfa Financial Corporation (an Alabama corporation)

Alfa Benefits Corporation (an Alabama corporation) 

The Vision Insurance Group, LLC (a Tennessee limited liability company)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          92,922
<SECURITIES>                                     3,058
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,280
<INVENTORY>                                     23,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,395
<PP&E>                                          15,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       126,569
<OTHER-SE>                                       (256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,121
<SALES>                                        202,601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,601
<CGS>                                          119,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,280
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,366
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,663
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33
        

</TABLE>
# Tentative 2012 Legislative Schedule

**

----

**112th Congress, 2nd Session**

The *tentative* schedule for 2012 has been announced. The list below identifies expected non-legislative periods (days that the Senate *will not* be in session). The schedule is also available in calendar format (pdf image). The 2011 tentative schedule is still available. 
DateActionNoteJan 23ConveneMartin Luther King, Jr. Holiday- Jan 16Feb 20-Feb 24State Work PeriodPresidents' Day- Feb 20Apr 2- Apr 13State Work Period Apr 30-May 4State Work Period May 28-Jun 1State Work PeriodMemorial Day- May 28Jul 2-Jul 6State Work PeriodIndependence Day- Jul 4Aug 6-Sep 7State Work PeriodLabor Day- Sep 3Oct 8Federal HolidayColumbus DayNov 12Federal HolidayVeterans' Day (observed)TBDTarget Adjournment Date
Updated on Nov 1, 2011
|   |
|--------|

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Days in Session 

These calendars (Congress.gov)  list the days the Senate met for each session of Congress.

Visit the "Sessions of Congress"  web page to find out more about this topic.

### House Calendar 

View the House of Representatives Calendars.

### Senators Phone List 

This list of senators' suite and phone numbers in pdf format is updated every couple of weeks at the beginning of a new Congress.

### Related Links 

Learn about the *Legislative Process and the United States Senate*. (CRS) (PDF)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Greg D. Forrest,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  Greg D. Forrest     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Greg  D. Forrest         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | June 3,  2008       |

 

----
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Saks Incorporated & Ronald L. Frasch



 Exhibit 10.3 
 April 9, 2009 
 Ronald L. Frasch 
 19 Hirst Road

 Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510 
  

	Re:	Employment Agreement between Saks Incorporated and Ronald L. Frasch, dated as of July 31, 2007, as amended on December 18, 2008 (“Employment Agreement”)


 Dear Ron: 
 This letter agreement serves to
amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with Section 13(c) thereof. All capitalized terms in this letter agreement shall have the same meaning as in the Employment Agreement, except as provided herein. 
 Effective June 1, 2009, solely for purposes of Sections 3(a) and 3(b) and the definition of “Good Reason” contained in Section 4(c) of the Employment
Agreement, Executive’s Base Salary shall be reduced 7% from $1,050,000 to $976,500. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, for all other purposes of the Agreement, the term Base Salary shall be $1,050,000 (or any higher rate from time to time
in effect). 
 The Company acknowledges that “Good Reason” under the Employment Agreement includes, among other things, “any reduction in the
Executive’s Base Salary [or] annual bonus opportunity in any such case below the level specified by this Agreement without the substitution of an equivalent benefit”, and that the Executive may terminate employment for Good Reason
following the effective date of the change in Base Salary mentioned above. Executive, by signing below, hereby irrevocably waives Executive’s right to claim Good Reason solely as a consequence of the changes provided above. This waiver is a one
time waiver of Executive’s right under the Employment Agreement, and shall not be binding on the Executive in any other respect. 







 The changes to the Employment Agreement described above are subject to the approval of the Human Resources and
Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and shall only become effective upon such approval. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	SAKS INCORPORATED
	
	/s/ Christine A. Morena
	Christine A. Morena
	Executive Vice President, Human Resources

  

			
	 By signing on the line below, Executive
 expressly agrees to the change in Base Salary
 and waives Executive’s right to claim “Good
 Reason” under the Employment Agreement

		
	By:	 	/s/ Ronald L. Frasch
		 	Ronald L. Frasch
		
	Title:	 	President

 Date: 4-15-09 
  

 Page 2
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2384

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to require the use of dredged

material in the construction of federally funded transportation projects.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 11, 2000

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to require the

use of dredged material in the construction of federally

funded transportation projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter III of chapter 3 of

5 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the

6 end the following:

7 ‘‘§ 354. Use of dredged material

8 ‘‘The Secretary of Transportation shall require, to

9 the maximum extent practicable, the use of dredged mate-
2

•S 2384 IS

1 rial in the construction of federally funded transportation

2 projects.’’.

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec4 tions for chapter 3 of title 49, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end of the items relating to

6 subchapter III the following:

‘‘354. Use of dredged material.’’.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 07, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 07, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0366. IN THE INTEREST OF N. B. S., A CHILD (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18J028
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert B. Wagner, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |     /s/ Robert B. Wagner |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert B. Wagner                             |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                      |
|   | September 5, 2007                            |

 

----
#### George J. Peacock, Respondent, v. T. A. Snider Preserve Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Daniel Friel to Lay Out a Highway in the Town of Ellicottville, and the Assessment of Damages Therefor.

Order of County Court confirmed.
No. 1,402, 1,403.

#### LYNCH, Respondent, *v.*BECHTEL, Appellant.

*Appeal from District*Court, *Silver Bow County.*

*Mr. John N.*Kirie, and *Mr. E. N.*Harwood, for Appellant.

Decided January 2, 1902.

Per Curiam.

— Tírese appeals are this day dismissed as settled, without cost to either party, in accordance with the stipulations filed herein.
# States in the Senate | Maryland

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Benjamin L. Cardin (D)***Hometown: Baltimore*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Chris Van Hollen (D)***Hometown: Kensington*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Maryland became the seventh state to join the Union on April 28, 1788. Maryland’s first two senators, Charles Carroll and John Henry, took office on March 4, 1789. Maryland’s longest-serving senators include Millard Tydings (1927-1951), Paul Sarbanes (1977-2007), and Barbara Mikulski (1987-2017). In 2011 Barbara Mikulski became the longest-serving female senator to date. Mikulski was also the first Democratic woman to serve in a leadership position, as Democratic Conference secretary. John Howard and Samuel Smith both served as the Senate’s president pro tempore. As vice president, Spiro Agnew was the Senate’s constitutional president or presiding officer.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Jerry A. Newby, President and Chief Executive Officer of Alfa Corporation and Stephen G. Rutledge, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alfa Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Jerry A. Newby                   
|Jerry A. Newby                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|/s/ Stephen G. Rutledge              
|Stephen G. Rutledge                  
|Chief Financial Officer              
|                                     
|May 9, 2007                          



55