alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DoD-2010-OS-0052]

# AGENCY:

National Security Agency/Central Security Service, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to amend a system of records; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21250), DoD published a notice announcing its intent to amend an existing Privacy Act system of records. In one instance an incorrect system ID number was cited. This notice corrects that error.

# DATES:

Effective May 14, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Anne Hill at 301-688-6527.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On April 23, 2010, DoD published a notice announcing its intent to amend an existing Privacy Act system of records: The NSA Police Operational Files. Subsequent to the publication of that notice, DoD discovered that the system ID number was missing a zero in one instance (page 21251). This notice corrects that information.

The system ID number on page 21250 is correct.

## Correction

In the notice (FR Doc. 2010-9393), published on April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21250) make the following correction. On page 21251, in the second column, line 1, correct the system ID number “GNSA 2” to read “GNSA 20”.

Dated: May 11, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-11580 Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September  30, 2010 (the  "Report") I, Louie
Ucciferri,  Corporate  Secretary,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18USC  ss.ss..1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
ss.ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: November 15, 2010

                     By: \s\Louie Ucciferri
                     -----------------------------------------------------------
                     Louie Ucciferri, Corporate Secretary,
                     Acting Chief Financial Officer
                    (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered February 11, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00797-CV

IN RE JOHN THOMPSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-83205-2021

ORDER

Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this case for want of 

jurisdiction.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                       177
<INVENTORY>                                      5,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,727
<PP&E>                                          14,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,391
<BONDS>                                         10,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              344
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,330
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,449
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                        44
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
# Charles McNary: A Featured Biography

**

----

Senator Charles McNary of Oregon spent 28 years in the United States Senate. A quiet leader with a unique affinity for building strong relationships, he was ranked as the most popular member of the Senate for nearly three decades. His leadership skills and legislative sensibilities made him a highly effective minority leader from 1933 to 1944, a difficult period of economic depression and war. Respected by colleagues on both sides of the aisle, McNary forged strong bipartisan coalitions and maintained a good working relationship with President Franklin Roosevelt. McNary also has the distinction of being the first Republican leader to occupy one of the front-row, center-aisle seats now reserved for majority and minority leaders.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Charles McNary
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Supreme Court

Nathenia J. Rossington, Respondent,

v.

Julio A. Rossington, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2022-000715

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From Berkeley County

The Honorable Michael S. Holt, Family Court Judge

Opinion No. 28123

Submitted November 3, 2022 – Filed November 23, 2022

REMANDED

Brett Lamb Stevens, of Stevens Law, LLC, of Columbia, 

for Petitioner.

Megan Catherine Hunt Dell, of Dell Family Law, P.C., of 

Charleston, for Respondent.

Suzanne E. Groff, of Charleston, Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review the court of 

appeals' reversal of the family court's order in this matter. Rossington v. 

Rossington, Op. No. 2022-UP-025 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Jan. 12, 2022). We grant 

the petition on Petitioner's Questions 1, 2, and 4 and deny the petition on 

Petitioner's Question 3. 

This action was commenced in 2017. The matter of physical and legal custody of 

the parties' minor child has been in contention for almost six years—since the child 

was two months old. We regret the delay caused in part by our state's court system

and acknowledge considerable changes and milestones could occur for a minor 

child during such a substantial delay that may alter the determination of an 

arrangement created in the best interests of the child. Indeed, it is more than likely 

the amount of time that has passed since the family court's order has resulted in a 

stale record incapable of reflecting facts and circumstances from which the current

best interests of the child can be determined. See Davis v. Davis, 356 S.C. 132, 

135, 588 S.E.2d 102, 103 (2003) (holding the best interests of the child is the 

court's paramount consideration in child custody matters). 

Accordingly, we dispense with briefing, remand this matter to the family court for 

a trial de novo on the custody issue to ensure the custody determination is based on 

the current best interests of the child, and direct the family court to revise the 

award of attorney's fees in light of the new trial on the custody issue. See

Georgetown Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Phipps, 278 S.C. 64, 65, 292 S.E.2d 184, 

185 (1982) (remanding to the family court for a trial de novo, with the full right of 

each party to submit evidence and be heard on custody, due to the considerable 

amount of time—three years—that had elapsed between the original custody order 

and this Court's decision in the matter); Dorn v. Criddle, 306 S.C. 189, 193, 410 

S.E.2d 590, 593 (Ct. App. 1991) (remanding a child custody matter for a trial de 

novo after a three-year lapse between court proceedings resulted in a stale record); 

Cook v. Cook, 280 S.C. 91, 93, 311 S.E.2d 90, 91 (Ct. App. 1984) (remanding a 

child custody matter for a trial de novo after a four-year lapse between court

proceedings resulted in a stale record). If either party wishes to appeal the order of 

the family court after a trial de novo, the appeal shall be filed directly with this 

Court. 

REMANDED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 0351

_____________________________
S USAN D UNNAM , Appellant,

v.

C HRISTINE F OX , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Okaloosa County

. James Ward, II , Judge

.

February 27, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and R AY and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Susan Dunnam, pro se, Appellant.

Scott M. Work
, Work Law Firm, PA, Destin, for Appellee.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAROJANI DEVI GOVINDER,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72668

Agency No. A070-450-532

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 1, 2011** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Sarojani Devi Govinder, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

AUG 2 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72668

an abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Toufighi v.

Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Govinder’s motion to reopen

because it considered the record and acted within its broad discretion in

determining that the evidence was insufficient to establish prima facie eligibility

for asylum, withholding of removal, or CAT relief. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558

F.3d 1049, 1060, 1068 (9th Cir. 2009); Mendez-Gutierrez v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d

1168, 1171-72 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Govinder’s contentions that the BIA failed to apply the proper legal standard

or address her claim for withholding of removal are belied by the record. 

The BIA also did not abuse its discretion in finding that Govinder is not

prima facie eligible for relief under the Convention Against Torture because

Govinder failed to establish it is more likely than not she will be tortured if

returned to Fiji. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1068. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
v150341_10-719 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.71.2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7797

MICHAEL G. KESELICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES A. MOOSE, in his individual and

official capacity as the Montgomery County

Police Chief (since resigned); THOMAS P.

REICH, in his individual and official capacity

as a Montgomery County Police Detective (since

retired); MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT;

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 03-7824

MICHAEL G. KESELICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOUGLAS GANSLER, in his individual and

official capacity as State’s Attorney for

Montgomery County, Maryland; BRYAN ROSLUND, in

his individual official capacity as Assistant

State’s Attorney for Montgomery County,

Maryland; FRANK MALONEY, in his individual and

official capacity as Assistant State’s

Attorney for Montgomery County, Maryland; THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.
- 2 -

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-

2703-1-AMD; CA-03-2704-AMD)

Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: April 6, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael G. Keselica, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael G. Keselica appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Keselica v.

Moose, No. CA-03-2703-1-AMD; Keselica v. Gansler, No. CA-03-2704-

AMD (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,113
<PP&E>                                           8,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,613
<BONDS>                                         14,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           355
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,275
<SALES>                                         23,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,042
<CGS>                                           17,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                        60
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.05
        

</TABLE>
APPROVED RESOLUTIONS

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that pursuant to Section 3.01 of the Bylaws, the Executive Committee, on behalf of 

the Board, recognizes the generosity of The Boeing Company to the Smithsonian and the 

National Air and Space Museum and approves continuing the naming of the Boeing 

Aviation Hanger through 2052.  [2010.09.23] 

VOTED that pursuant to Section 3.01 of the Bylaws, the Executive Committee, on behalf of 

the Board of Regents, recognizes the generosity of American Express to the National 

Museum of African American History and Culture and accepts the terms of the gift 

agreement.  In addition, the Regents approve in advance the naming of a gallery space 

within the museum building for a period of 25 years from the date of the public opening of 

the building.  The name of the gallery will be consistent with the policies and guidelines of 

the Smithsonian and the museum.  The donor also has a first right to name the space again 

after the term of the naming is completed if the museum again elects to offer the space for 

named recognition.  [2010.09.24] 

VOTED that pursuant to Section 3.01 of the Bylaws, the Executive Committee, on behalf of 

the Board of Regents, approves the reappointments of Anne Ehrenkranz, Eric Green, and 

Richard Meier to the Board of Trustees of Cooper Hewitt, National Design Museum for 

three year terms effective immediately.  [2010.09.25] 

VOTED that pursuant to the September 20, 2010, delegation by the Board of Regents, the 

Executive Committee affirms the revised 2011 Smithsonian Organizational Goals.  

[2010.09.26]
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26793-26794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11281]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,194]

Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Including On-Site Leased Workers from 
Adecco, St. Elizabeth Business Health, Guardsmark, and Lab Support, 
Cincinnati, OH; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply 
for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on March 26, 2010, applicable to workers of Beam Global Spirits & Wine, 
including on-site leased workers from Adecco, Cincinnati, Ohio. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register April 23, 2010 (75 FR 
21354).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to the production of cordials.
    The company reports that workers leased from St. Elizabeth Business 
Health, Guardsmark, and Lab Support were employed on-site at the 
Cincinnati, Ohio location of Beam Global Spirits & Wine. The Department 
has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control 
of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from St. Elizabeth Business 
Health, Guardsmark, and Lab Support working on-site at the Cincinnati, 
Ohio location of Beam Global Spirits & Wine.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,194 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Beam Global Spirits & Wine, including on-site 
leased workers from Adecco, St. Elizabeth Business Health, 
Guardsmark, and Lab Support, Cincinnati, Ohio, who became totally or 
partially

[[Page 26794]]

separated from employment on or after December 29, 2008, through 
March 26, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total 
or partial separation from employment on the date of certification 
through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.''

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 28th day of April, 2010.
 Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-11281 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```