alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REII INCORPORATED
                        (Formerly Bap Acquisition Corp.)
			    1051 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH,
			     NAPLES, FL 34102-5818
			      TEL: (941) 261-3396
			      FAX: (941) 261-5031

                                November 12, 1998

Ms. Barbara Jacobs-Deputy Director
Mr, Ed. Loftus-Chief Accountant
U.S.Securities & Exchange Commission,
Corporate & Finance Small Business Section,
Washington, DC

I am hereby transmitting form 10Q-SB for the period ended September 30, 1998.
The financial statements included herein reflect no changes from the 
preceding periods in accounting principles or practices or in the method 
of applying them.

Yours Truly,

REII Incorporated.

/s/ Garfield Ricketts
----------------------
Garfield Ricketts-President.



<PAGE>                         
				UNITED STATES
		      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
			     WASHINGTON DC 20549

				FORM 10-QSB

	       QUARTERLY REPORT PUSRUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) THE
			  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  For the Quarter Ending September 30,1998  Commission File Number 21-16563-B

                              REII INCORPORATED
                          (Formerly Bap Acquisition Corp.
	     -----------------------------------------------------
	    ( Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)           

                  DELAWARE                                  51-0373876
           -----------------------                     ---------------------
   (State or other Jurisdiction of                    (IRS Employee Number)
   (Incorporation Or Organization)

	      1051 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, NAPLES, FLORIDA        34102
	     ------------------------------------------    ----------
	       (Address of Principal Executive Offices)    (Zip Code)

			      (941) 261-3396
		      ------------------------------
		      (Regiatrant's Telephone Number
			    Including Area Code)


   Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports 
   required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
   Act of 1934 during the preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period
   that the registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been
   subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

		  Yes  [X]                             No_____              


   As of September 30, 1998  4,655,310 shares of common stock, $.001 par were 
   outstanding.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11675]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9152-1]


Announcement of the Board of Trustees for the National 
Environmental Education Foundation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published a document in 
the Federal Register of April 19, 2010, concerning announcement of the 
Board of Trustees for the National Environmental Education Foundation. 
The document contained misspelled names.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Burnett, 202-564-0446.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 19, 2010, in the FR Doc. 2010-
8927, on page 20350, in the third column, correct the name and law firm 
of the appointee to read:
    The appointee is Manuel Alberto Diaz, a partner in the law firm 
Lydecker Diaz, L.L.P.

    Dated: May 11, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-11675 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-40473

Summary Calendar

_____________________

SEAN L. PRICE,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant,

versus

SUZETTE DAYSON SHELMIRE, ET AL.,

Defendants,

SUZETTE DAYSON SHELMIRE,

Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

USDA No. 6:94-CV-573

_________________________________________________________________

January 17, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sean L. Price appeals the district court's denial of his

motion for reconsideration, which the court construed as a motion

for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). He argues that any

applicable statutes of limitations pertaining to his claim that the

defendants fraudulently obtained property from his mother and aunt

in violation of their civil rights should be tolled. We have
-2-

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for essentially the

reasons given by the district court.

A F F I R M E D.
cc: Hon. Egan K. Walker, District Judge Mark Lloyd Sturdivant Routsis Hardy-Cooper Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 

### e
BAP ACQUISITION CORP.
                            1051 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH,
			     NAPLES, FL 34102-5818
			      TEL: (941) 261-3396
			      FAX: (941) 261-5031

                                May 13, 1998

Ms. Barbara Jacobs-Deputy Director
Mr, Ed. Loftus-Chief Accountant
U.S.Securities & Exchange Commission,
Corporate & Finance Small Business Section,
Washington, DC

I am hereby transmitting form 10Q-SB for the period ended September 30, 1997.
The financial statements included herein reflect no changes from the 
preceding periods in accounting principles or practices or in the method 
of applying them.

Yours Truly,

Bap Acquisition Corp.

/s/ Garfield Ricketts
----------------------
Garfield Ricketts-President.


<PAGE>
				
				UNITED STATES
		      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
			     WASHINGTON DC 20549

				FORM 10-QSB

	       QUARTERLY REPORT PUSRUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) THE
			  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  For the Quarter Ending September 30,1997  Commission File Number 21-16563-B
			  
			     BAP ACQUISITION CORP.
	     -----------------------------------------------------
	    ( Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)           

           DELAWARE                                       51-0373876 
    -----------------------------                     ---------------------   
   (State or other Jurisdiction of                    (IRS Employee Number)
   (Incorporation Or Organization)

	      1051 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, NAPLES, FLORIDA        34102
	     ------------------------------------------    ----------
	       (Address of Principal Executive Offices)    (Zip Code)

			      (941) 261-3396
		      ------------------------------
		      (Regiatrant's Telephone Number
			    Including Area Code)


   Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports 
   required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
   Act of 1934 during the preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period
   that the registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been
   subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

		  Yes  [X]                             No_____              


   As of September 30, 1997  4,655,310 shares of common stock, $.001 par were 
   outstanding.

<PAGE>                   








												Mr Garfield Ricketts-President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2010 (the "Report") I, William
E.  Beifuss,  Interim  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President  of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18USC ss.ss..1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: November 15, 2010

                         By: \s\William E. Beifuss
                         -------------------------------------------------------
                         William E. Beifuss, Interim Chief Executive Officer
                         and President
                        (Principal Executive Officer)


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries



|Name                                 | Jurisdiction of Incorporation | Ownership
|------------------------------------ | ----------------------------- | ---------
|                                     |                               |          
|Air Industries Machining, Corp.      | New York                      | 100%     
|                                     |                               |          
|Welding Metallurgy, Inc.             | New York                      | 100%     
|                                     |                               |          
|Nassau Tool Works, Inc.              | New York                      | 100%     
|                                     |                               |          
|Woodbine Products, Inc.              | New York                      | 100% *   
|                                     |                               |          
|Decimal Industries, Inc.             | New York                      | 100% *   
|                                     |                               |          
|Miller Stuart, Inc.                  | New York                      | 100% *   
|                                     |                               |          
|Compac Development Corporation       | New York                      | 100% *   
|                                     |                               |          
|Eur-Pac Corporation                  | Connecticut                   | 100%     
|                                     |                               |          
|Electronic Connection Corporation    | Connecticut                   | 100%     
|                                     |                               |          
|The Sterling Engineering Corporation | Connecticut                   | 100%     
|                                     |                               |          
|Air Realty Group, LLC                | Connecticut                   | 100%     



* Owned indirectly through Welding Metallurgy, Inc.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

KEVIN LACY,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent

______________________ 

2014-3163

______________________ 

Petition for review of an arbitrator's decision in No. 

FMCS#121028-50691-1. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

THOMAS J. GAGLIARDO, The Gagliardo Law Firm, Baltimore, MD, argued for petitioner. 

 SONIA MARIE ORFIELD, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Branch, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by 

BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., REGINALD 

T. BLADES, JR. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 16, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
#### STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, for Itself and on Behalf of All Creditors of the Defendant Banks, Respondent, v. FIRST STATE BANK OF JUD, et al., Appellants.

(202 N. W. 404.)

Opinion filed September 22, 1924.

Refiled December 31, 1924.

Pee Curiak.

This is an action instituted by the Attorney General pursuant to Senate Bill No. 267, Session Laws of 1923, for the purpose of having certain banks declared insolvent and their affairs wound up. This court refrained from entertaining original jurisdiction of such proceeding, and in accordance with § 18 of said Act caused the papers and files therein to be transmitted to the district court of Burleigh County, and designated the Hon. Chas. M. Cooley, one of the Judges of the First Judicial District, to hear and try said controversy.

The Slope County State Bank of Amidon, Eegent State Bank of Eegent and Security State Bank of Courtenay, appeared in said proceeding in the district court and asserted that Senate Bill No. 267, Laws 1923, is unconstitutional and that the proceedings authorized therein and then pending in said district court were violative of cer*84tain provisions of tbe Federal and State Constitutions. Tbe district court overruled these contentions, and tbe said named three banks appealed.

It is held that the constitutional objections raised by the appellants are not well founded and the order appealed from is affirmed. An opinion will be later filed setting forth more fully the grounds on which this conclusion is based.

Bronson, Ch. J., and Christianson, Birixzell, Nuessle, and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

After the foregoing opinion was filed the questions involved in this case, and certain additional ones, were raised in State v. Mohall Bank et al., ante, 231 and the decision in that case is determinative of all questions presented in this case.

Affirmed.
# Timothy Pickering: A Featured Biography

**

----

In 1811, after violating a Senate rule regarding injunctions of secrecy, Massachusetts senator Timothy Pickering became the first of nine senators ever to be censured by the Senate. In an effort to prove President James Madison had acted unconstitutionally in seizing part of West Florida from Spain, Pickering overlooked a rule that protected a document from being publicly shared. One of the last members of the Federalist Party, Pickering's mistake cost him reelection to the Senate in 1811. He was, however, elected to serve in both the 13th and 14th Congresses as a Federalist Representative from Massachusetts. Born in Salem, Massachusetts, on July 17, 1745, Pickering attended Harvard and studied law after graduating in 1763. A colonel in the Revolutionary army, he later served as quartermaster general (1780), postmaster general (1791), secretary of war (1795), and secretary of state (1795-1800), before becoming a U.S. senator in 1803.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  from the  Consolidated
Balance  Sheet at March  31,  1998 and the  related  Statement  of  Consolidated
Operations  for the three  months  ended March 31, 1998, restated to reflect the
April 30, 1998 pooling of interests with Plutonic Resources Limited.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998      
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               153,219
<SECURITIES>                                         120,288
<RECEIVABLES>                                         48,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                           99,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     454,283
<PP&E>                                             2,380,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,367,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,609,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                145,537
<BONDS>                                              377,264
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             210,623
<OTHER-SE>                                           459,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,609,709
<SALES>                                              200,472
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     216,217
<CGS>                                                171,647 <F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        184,212 <F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      22,331 <F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     5,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        4,562 
<INCOME-TAX>                                           7,220 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (6,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (6,586)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.03)

<FN>
<F1> Includes  Production  costs and  Depreciation,  depletion and  amortization
     from the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
<F2> Includes  Production  costs,  Depreciation,  depletion and amortization and
     Administrative  and general  expense  from the  Statement  of  Consolidated
     Operations.
<F3> Includes  Exploration  expense,  Write-downs  and  other  unusual  charges,
     Business  combination  and  integration  costs and Other  expense  from the
     Statement of Consolidated Operations.


</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### CARL MILLER, Respondent, v. ED CAFFRAY, Appellant.

(192 N. W. 974.)

Account stated — action properly brought on account stated.

*Iu*an action *upon*an account stated, where merchandise was sold, thereafter a note given therefor, later, a payment made, the note surrendered to defendant, and a slip made, signed by the defendant, evidencing the balance due, and, where, before action commenced, defendant destroyed the note, it is *held,*for reasons stated in the opinion, that the action was properly brought and that the evidence supports the jury’s verdict that the merchandise was sold by plaintiff to defendant.

Opinion filed March 26, 1923.

Accounts and Accounting, 1 C. J. § 331 p. 706 n. 99.

In District Court, Logan Comity, McKenna, J.

Action upon account stated.

Defendant lias appealed from a judgment.

Affirmed.

*Arthur B. Atkins*and *Scott*Cameron, for appellant.

*I. F.*Wagner, for respondent.

Bronson, Ch. J.

Plaintiff recovered, in justice’s court, judgment upon a general account for goods and merchandise sold. Defendant appealed to the district court. There, after reframing of the pleadings and trial de novo before a jury, plaintiff recovered a judgment for $130.10. Defendant has now appealed to this court.

The complaint in the district court alleges an account stated for $90 and interest. The defense is a general denial and that plaintiff’s claim was the debt of a third person which defendant never, in writing, had agreed to pay. Plaintiff conducted a store in Napoleon, North Dakota. Goods were furnished by plaintiff to defendant and to his tenant in the amount of $19S.

Later, pursuant to plaintiff’s testimony, defendant gave a note therefor and received from plaintiff the charge slips for the goods sold. Later, he paid plaintiff $108 upon this note. Plaintiff surrendered to defendant the note, upon the understanding that defendant would pay .the balance in a few days. Plaintiff thereupon made a slip which showed a balance of $90 owing plaintiff upon sales to defendant. Later, *626defendant signed this slip. Defendant destroyed the note. Defendant contends that erroneously plaintiff has brought this action upon an account stated instead of upon the note. This contention is without merit. Suit was upon an account stated, that is, upon a settled account. Defendant was in no position to complain concerning the form of the action after the destruction of the note and signing the slip that evidenced the balance due upon this account as a settled account. The defendant also maintains that there is no proof of any oral agreement or promise on the part of defendant in the record to pay for goods furnished the tenant. This contention is likewise without merit, for there is direct evidence, sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, that the goods were sold by plaintiff to defendant.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Christianson, Johnson, Birdzell, and Nuessle, JJ., concur.
# Morris Sheppard: A Featured Biography

**

----

A Democratic senator from Texas, Morris Sheppard (1875-1941) fought for progressive reforms such as banking regulation and women's suffrage. Although he served as Senate Democratic Party whip for four years, Sheppard is best remembered as the "Father of Prohibition."  He supported temperance reform on the grounds that alcohol was a scourge on society and a threat to the family. In 1913 he introduced a constitutional amendment to prohibit the "manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors." Congress enacted it in 1917, and the states ratified the 18th Amendment in 1919.  Unexpectedly, Prohibition fostered lawlessness in the 1920s, and in 1933 Congress and the states repealed the amendment. Although disappointed, Sheppard  remained an active legislator, promoting legislation to aid farmers and low-income Americans, and for military preparedness in the years before World War II.  

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Senate art depicting Morris Sheppard
v150341_10-64 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.64
#### Joseph Hubert, an Infant, by Eugene Hubert, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. United Traction Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed as against the evidence and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.

All concurred. Betts, J., not sitting.