alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 


May 20, 2009


 


Fossil, Inc.


Attn: Tom Kartsotis


2280 N. Greenville Avenue

Richardson, TX 75082


 


	
  Re:

  	
   

  	
  Acceptance to Serve as an
  Advisory Director and Election to Decline Participation in the
  Fossil, Inc. 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan

  



 


Dear Randy:


 


This letter is to serve as
my acceptance of the position as “Advisory Director” to Fossil, Inc. (the “Company”)
for a term of one (1) year, to expire on May 19, 2010.


 


I understand that by serving
as an Advisory Director, I will remain an “outside director” for purposes of
the Fossil, Inc. 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and a “nonemployee
director” for purposes of the Fossil, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (the “1999
Plan”), and that I have not suffered a termination of service for purposes of
the 2008 Plan and 1999 Plan.  In
addition, I understand that all of the outstanding stock options granted to me,
as of the date hereof, will continue to remain in effect as the option
agreements are written.


 


Lastly, this letter serves
as my election to decline participation in the 2008 Plan.  I understand and agree that by declining to
participate in the 2008 Plan I shall not be entitled to any further annual
automatic director grants made pursuant to the 2008 Plan that would otherwise
be available to me as an outside director of the Company.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /a/ Alan J. Gold

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Alan J. Gold

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Tom Kartsotis

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  Tom Kartsotis

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Chairman
Order entered April 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01086-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.B.N., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-51998-2011

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 5, 2021 second motion for an extension 

of time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time 

to May 5, 2021. We caution appellant that further extension requests will be 

disfavored.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
#### Oscar Lagerquist, as Administrator, etc., of Astrid Lagerquist, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The United States Industrial Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Request for the direction of a verdict by both parties*— *waiver of a submission of the case to the jury. .*

t the close of the testimony on both sides upon the trial of an action the defendant requested the court to direct a verdict in its favor. Thereupon the court asked the plaintiff if he requested the direction of a. verdict and was answered in the affirmative. The court then directed a verdict for the plaintiff as requested. Whereupon the defendant requested permission to go to the jury, which was denied.

*Held,*that the record presented no error; that when both parties unite in requesting the court to direct.a verdict they are both deemed to have agreed that the facts may he determined by it, and its decision will he sustained if there is any evidence to uphold it.

Brown, P. J., dissenting.

Appeal 'by the defendant, The United States Industrial Insurance Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 4th day of April, 1895, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the Kings County Circuit, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the *264th day of April, 1895, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

*Edward W. S.*Johnston, for the appellant.

*J. Edrward Swanstrom,*for the respondent.

Dykman, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiif for the sum of $254.52, which was entered on the verdict of a jury directed by the court after a trial before a jury, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the minutes of the court.

At the close of the testimony on both sides, the counsel for the defendant requested the tidal judge to direct a verdict for the defendant on the ground that there was a breach of the warranty contained in the policy, and also false representations which avoided the policy. The trial judge then asked the plaintiif if he requested the direction of a verdict, and was answered in the affirmative. Thereupon the trial judge directed a verdict for the plaintiif. Then the counsel for the defendant requested permission to go to the jury, and the trial judge then stated that he denied the motion of the defendant and granted the motion of the plaintiff and directed a verdict for him. There was an exception to such direction.

The record presents no error.

"When the counsel for both parties unite in requesting the court to direct a verdict, they are both deemed to have agreed that the facts might be determined by the trial judge, and his decision will be sustained if there be any evidence to uphold it. *(Dillon*v. *Cockcroft,*90 N. Y. 649; *Mayer*v. *Dean,*115 id. 556.)

In this case there was ample evidence to support the decision of the trial judge, and this order denying the motion for a new trial on the minutes of the court must be affirmed, with costs.

Pratt, J., concurred; Brown, P. J., dissented.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Harrison Gilmore, Appellant, v. The City of Utica and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred.
# Clifford Case: A Featured Biography

**

----

Clifford P. Case, a liberal Republican from New Jersey, served in the House of Representatives for 10 years and in the Senate for 24 years. Throughout his congressional career, he championed civil rights legislation, playing a key role in the passage of the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Case also was a strong advocate for labor, conservation, and environmental protection. As the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Case pushed for a bipartisan foreign policy, supported human rights issues, was a vocal proponent for Israel, and helped forge a key compromise resulting in the ratification of the Panama Canal Treaties. As the conservative movement grew in the 1960s and ‘70s, Case faced stiff challenges from within his own party and lost a primary battle in his 1978 bid for reelection.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
#### C. P. Heartwell, guardian, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Eubanks Tompkins *et al.,*defendants in error.

Where, in an arbitration between the guardian of a minor legatee and the executor of an estate, it was decreed that all the notes of the estate should be turned over to the minor as her property:

*Held,*That in a pending suit on one of the said notes, proof of this award excused the filing of the affidavit required by the Act of October 13, 1870, and this is not met by proof that there are outstanding debts against the estate.

Relief Act of 1870. Tax affidavit. Minor. Before Judge Strozier. Dougherty Superior Court. January Term, 1872.

C. P. Heartwell, as guardian of Dollie Tarver, a minor, brought complaint against Eubanks Tompkins, James IT. Hill and Benjamin R. Smith, on a note made January 1st, 1860, payable twelve months after date “to H. A. Tarver, exeGutor of C. C. Tarver, executor or bearer,” for the sum of $1,049.

Plaintiff’ introduced the following evidence, to-wit:

1st. The note sued on.

2d. C. P. Heartwell, who testified as follows, to-wit: That the note sued on is the property of Dollie Tarver, a minor; that in 1863, he, in right of his wife, had a settlement with H. A. Tarver, and received from him one-third of the estate of Paul Tarver, deceased, to which she was entitled, under his will; that the remaining two-thirds of the estate, including the note sued on, fell to the share of Dollie Tarver; that there are some outstanding debts against said estate in execution.

*4533d. An award made June 23d, 1870, on a case between H, A. Tarver, executor, and C. P. Heartwell, as guardian for Dollie Tarver, a minor, showing that the note sued on, and all other notes of said estate in the hands of said executor, were awarded to said Dollie Tarver, and fully ratifying the settlement made in 1863.

Plaintiff closed. Defendants moved to dismiss the case, upon the ground that there had been no proof of the payment of taxes on the note sued on. The motion was sustained by the Court and the case dismissed.

Plaintiff excepted and assigns said ruling as error.

Vason *&*Davis; R. F. Lyon, for plaintiff in error.

Wright & Warren, for defendant.

McCay, Judge.

The 14th section of the Act of October 13th, 1870, expressly excepts from its operation debts due to minors. The proof in this case was conclusive that this note was the property of Dollie Tarver, a minor, and that it had been hers before the Act of October, 1870, was passed. It can make no difference how she obtained it, or whether the former owner of it had complied with the law. If the debt be due to a minor, the affidavit is not required. That there are still debts due by the estate from which the note came to her cannot change the fact that the note is hers, and is due to her. The holders of the debts may have a right to sue the executor for a *devastavit,*and, perhaps, to go on the distributees or legatees for their debts, but the title to the note passed to her, when it was, by the final decree, declared to be hers, and, as it was in the hands of her testamentai’y guardian, her title to it was complete.

Judgment reversed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roaming Messenger, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the "Report") I,
Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


\s\ Jonathan Lei
----------------------------------------------
Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Hiram Fong: A Featured Biography

**

----

Senator Hiram Fong became one of Hawaii’s first two U.S. senators in 1959, upon the state’s admission to the Union. The son of Chinese immigrants, Fong was also the first U.S. senator of Asian ancestry. During his nearly 18 years in the Senate, Fong advocated civil rights and voting rights legislation and immigration reform that sought to prevent discrimination against Asians. Known for his devotion to Hawaii and his constituents, Fong’s state pride can be seen in a 1983 oral history interview with Capitol Police Inspector Leonard Ballard, who fondly remembered pointing out to Senator Fong a pineapple light fixture in the U.S. Capitol.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00704-CR

Richard SALAZAR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR2671

Honorable Sid Harle, Judge Presiding1

BEFORE JUSTICE WATKINS, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 15, 2023.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

1 The Honorable Ron Rangel is the presiding judge of the 379th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, and he 

presided over Salazar’s trial and signed the final judgment of conviction in this case. However, the Honorable Sid 

Harle heard and ruled on the motion to dismiss at issue in this appeal.
# Robert Wagner: A Featured Biography

**

----

Senator Robert Wagner of New York (1877-1953) authored sweeping legislation that dramatically changed the American social and economic landscape. As chairman of the New York Assembly State Factory Investigation Committee from 1911 to 1915, he had investigated the tragic Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire and other industrial hazards. These experiences sharpened his commitment to reform. Elected to the U.S. Senate in 1926, Wagner became chairman of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee during the New Deal era. Two of his most notable accomplishments were enacted into law in 1935--the Social Security Act provided old-age pensions to Americans, and the Wagner Labor Act guaranteed labor's right to organize and bargain collectively. "Whether you like his laws or deplore them," one journalist noted, "he has placed on the books legislation more important and far-reaching than any American in history since the days of the founding fathers." Senator Wagner was also a leading proponent of federal anti-lynching legislation. In 2000 the United States Senate bestowed a unique honor on Senator Robert Wagner, voting to add his portrait to a very select collection in the Senate Reception Room.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Robert F. Wagner
|  | Lobbying Disclosure Act:             SEC. 20. DISCLOSURE OF THE VALUE OF ASSETS UNDER THE ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT ACT. |  |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|

| [Sec. 20 provides for amendments to section 102 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978]                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| Current through April 1, 2019— This compilation includes language from Public Law 104-65, as well as amending language from Public Laws 105-166 and 110-81 and 115-418. These materials are not official  evidence of the laws set forth herein. Sections 112 and 204 of title 1 of the United States Code establish the rules governing which text serves as legal evidence of the laws of the United States.

 For changes, after the closing date of this publication, to provisions of law in this publication, see the United States Code Classification Tables published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives at http://uscode.house.gov/classification/tables.shtml. |
* Included in Consent Agenda

APPENDIX A: ACTIONS OF THE

APRIL 11, 2016, MEETING OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

VOTED that the Board of Regents adopts the Consent Agenda, which constitutes the approval 

of all action items listed therein. [2016.04.01]

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the minutes of the January 25, 2016 

scheduled, meeting of the Board of Regents.*

VOTED that Board of Regents approves the amendments to the bylaws of the National 

Portrait Gallery Commission.*

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the proposed slate of candidates for 

appointment or reappointment to nine Smithsonian advisory boards.*

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the Compensation and Human Resources 

Committee’s compensation recommendation for the former Secretary. [2016.04.02]
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on
Form 10-KSB of our report dated March 26, 1997, on our audits of the statements
of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows of NuWave Technologies, Inc.
(a development stage company) for the period from July 17, 1995 (inception) to
December 31, 1996 included in the cumulative amounts for the period from July
17, 1995 (inception) to December 31, 1997, and for the year ended December
31, 1996, appearing in the registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 0-28606)
of NuWave Technologies, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.



                                             /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



New York, New York
March 24, 1998.
January 19, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DOMINIQUE WESLEY, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00822-CV V.

THE WALLINGFORD APARTMENTS, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on September 1, 2011. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

DOMINIQUE WESLEY.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2560

To reduce temporarily the duty on Mesamoll.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 16, 2000

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the duty on Mesamoll.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON MESAMOLL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new subheading:

‘‘ 9902.38.14 A certain

Alkylsulfonic

Acid Ester of

Phenol (CAS No.

70775–94–9)

(provided for in

subheading

3812.20.10) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•S 2560 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
* Honorable William M. Hoeveler, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

** Chief Judge R. Lanier Anderson, III, did not participate in this decision. This decision is rendered by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Rosario DONATO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-2428. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 7, 2000. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 96-865-CIV-ORL-19); Patricia C. Fawsett, Judge. Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, BLACK, Circuit Judge, and HOEVELER * , Senior District Judge. ** PER CURIAM: We affirm the district court's dismissal of Appe llant's complaint on the basis of the opinion rendered by the Supreme Court of Florida, Donato v. AT & T Co., No. SC93534, --- So.2d ---- (Fla. Jan.20, 2000). AFFIRMED.