alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Roll Call Tables

**

----

Tables below are listed by year. Vote numbers on each table link to the yea and nay tallies.

2022 (117th, 2nd)2021 (117th, 1st)2020 (116th, 2nd)2019 (116th, 1st)2018 (115th, 2nd)2017 (115th, 1st)2016 (114th, 2nd)2015 (114th, 1st)2014 (113th, 2nd)2013 (113th, 1st)2012 (112th, 2nd)2011 (112th, 1st)2010 (111th, 2nd)2009 (111th, 1st)2008 (110th, 2nd)2007 (110th, 1st)2006 (109th, 2nd)2005 (109th, 1st)2004 (108th, 2nd)2003 (108th, 1st)2002 (107th, 2nd)2001 (107th, 1st)2000 (106th, 2nd)1999 (106th, 1st)1998 (105th, 2nd)1997 (105th, 1st)1996 (104th, 2nd)1995 (104th, 1st)1994 (103rd, 2nd)1993 (103rd, 1st)1992 (102nd, 2nd)1991 (102nd, 1st)1990 (101st, 2nd)1989 (101st, 1st)

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Lobbying Disclosure 

Learn more about filing lobbying documents with the Office of Public Records.

### Find Bills 

Use this guide to help you find the full text of recent bills and resolutions on the Web, or order them from the Senate or House Document Rooms, or you can find them in a library.    

### Find Votes 

There are several sources for finding out about the floor votes cast by a senator or representative.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                             153,023
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      685,131
<ALLOWANCES>                       585,000
<INVENTORY>                      2,741,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 3,467,002
<PP&E>                           1,167,720
<DEPRECIATION>                     188,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,525,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,645,710
<BONDS>                            367,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                             37
<COMMON>                            33,942
<OTHER-SE>                       2,449,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,525,517
<SALES>                         13,522,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                13,522,166
<CGS>                           10,211,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    4,217,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 5,211,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               1,315,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (7,433,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                        24,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (7,458,305)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                    (7,458,305)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (2.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (2.79)
                           


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Telemetrix Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, I, William Becker, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

April 25, 2008

/s/ William Becker
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tower Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark S. Merrill, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                          |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date:    November 9, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark S. Merrill                                 
|                          |  |  |  |     |  | Mark S. Merrill                                     
|                          |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                          |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Morrisdale Coal Company, Respondent, v. Czarnikow, MacDougall & Company, Limited, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
#### Eastman Kodak Company, Respondent, v. Maurice Gottlieb Gennert and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Dake Drug Company.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred, except Robson, J., who dissented.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection  with the annual report of AmComp  Incorporated,  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kumar
Gursahaney,  Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

April 2, 2007                                 /s/ Kumar Gursahaney
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name: Kumar Gursahaney
                                              Title: Principal Financial Officer
```
#### Richard Turnbull, as Overseer of the Poor of the Town of New Lisbon, New York, Respondent, v. G. Arthur Gardner, Appellant.

Motion granted unless the appellant within twenty days files and serves printed case upon the respondent and pays the twenty dollars costs fixed by the previous order, in which case motion denied, without costs.
7 

JAMES MONROE 

President Monroe vetoed one bill. This regular veto 

was not overridden. 

There were no vetoes in the first and second sessions 

of the Fifteenth Congress, in the first and second sessions of the Sixteenth Congress, in the second session 

of the Seventeenth Congress, nor in the first and 

second sessions of the Eighteenth Congress. 

Seventeenth Congress, First Session 

Regular Veto 

10 H.R. 50. 

For the preservation and repair of the Cumberland 

Road. 

Vetoed May 4, 1822. The veto message was laid before 

the House. (May 4, 1822, H. Jour., pp. 560, 561; see 

also S. Misc. Doc. No. 53, 49th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 18- 

20). 

The House sustained the veto on May 6, 1822 by a 

vote of 68 yeas to 72 nays. (May 6, 1822, H. Jour., pp. 

580, 581). 

Veto sustained.
Petitioner, 

v. 

JIM SALMONSEN, Warden, 

MONTANA STATE PRISON, 

Respondent. 

13,

• 

Cle:c, S!_:pre.me Count 

IvIontana 

ORDER 

Jerry Joe Henderson has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, requesting 

correction of his sentence. He explains that all but the first five years of his sentence to the 

Department of Corrections should be suspended, pursuant to § 46-18-201(3)(a)(iv)(A),1

MCA. He adds that he was convicted under § 45-5-502, MCA, not § 45-5-503(4), MCA. 

Henderson also requests the assistance of counsel. 

In July 2019, the Gallatin County District Court sentenced Henderson to the 

Montana State Prison for thirty years with fifteen years suspended for sexual assault after 

this Court remanded the matter upon the State's concession concerning Henderson's plea 

to a sexual offense. See State v. Henderson, No. DA 17-0593, Order (Mont. Jan. 22, 2019). 

Henderson is rnistaken. The District Court never committed him to the Department 

of Corrections. The part of this statute, § 46-18-201(3)(a)(iv)(A), MCA, does not apply to 

him. Section 46-18-201(3)(a)(iii), MCA, applies to Henderson here. The applicable statute 

provides that a District Court may sentence an offender to a "term of incarceration, as 

provided in Title 45 for the offense, at a county detention center or at a state prison to be 

designated by the department of corrections [J" Section 46-18-201(3)(a)(iii), MCA (2011). 

' Henderson incorrectly cites to § 46-18-201(3)(a)(iv)(B), MCA, that concerns a youth 

transferred to a District Court for adjudication. 
Henderson has not demonstrated illegal incarceration. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. 

He has also not shown that he has a facially invalid sentence. Henderson is not entitled to 

any correction of his sentence. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Henderson's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED 

and DISMISSED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Henderson's request for assistance of counsel is 

DENIED, as rnoot. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to 

Jerry Joe Henderson persona y. 

DATED this ay of August, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

2
# A Senate Journal  by Allen Drury 

**

----

*A Senate Journal* may be available at your local public library or bookstore. 

        -  Virtual Reference Desk 
        -  Statistics & Lists 
        -  Bibliographies 
        -  How To... 
        -  Glossary 
        -  Senate Organization 
        -  The Constitution 
        -  Procurement 
        -  Employment & Internships 
        -            -  Senate Employment Office 
          -  Sergeant at Arms 
          -  Secretary of the Senate 
        -  Visiting
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PIERRE THOMAS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 178 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
2015 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-23-2015

USA v. Joseph Merlino

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

This April is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University

School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2015 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of

Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Joseph Merlino" (2015). 2015 Decisions. Paper 410.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015/410
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 14-4341

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOSEPH MERLINO

a/k/a Skinny Joey,

Appellant

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-99-cr-00363-001)

Present: AMBRO, VANASKIE, and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Appellant, Joseph Merlino, appeals from the orders of the District Court entered October 

20, 2014 and October 24, 2014, revoking his supervised release. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the orders of the District Court entered October 20, 2014 and 

October 24, 2014 are REVERSED and Appellant shall be released from custody 

immediately. 

Judge Shwartz dissents from the disposition. The Court will issue its majority,

concurring and dissenting opinions at a later time.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas I. Vanaskie,

Circuit Judge

Dated: April 23, 2015

JK/cc: David E. Troyer, Esq.

Edwin J. Jacobs, Jr., Esq.

Michael F. Myers, Esq.
January 19, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DOMINIQUE WESLEY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00822

- CV V.

THE WALLINGFORD APAR TMENTS , Appellee

____________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on September 1, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by DOMINIQUE WESLEY

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
SECOND
AMENDMENT

    TO
THE

    MODIGENE
INC.

    2007
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

     

    WHEREAS, Modigene Inc. (the
“Company”) sponsors and
maintains the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);

     

    WHEREAS, the Company now
desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock of
the Company (“Company
Stock”) available to satisfy awards issued thereunder;

     

    WHEREAS, the Board of
Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has approved an
amendment to the Plan that will increase the aggregate number of shares of
Company Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to awards made under the Plan from
3,000,000 to 6,000,000 shares of Company Stock;

     

    WHEREAS, pursuant to Section
16 of the Plan, no amendment may be made to the Plan that will increase the
aggregate number of shares of Company Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to
awards made under the Plan unless the amendment is approved by the stockholders
of the Company;

     

    WHEREAS, at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held on May 21, 2009, the stockholders of the Company
approved the increase in the number of shares of Company Stock reserved for
issuance under the Plan from 3,000,000 to 6,000,000 shares of Company Stock;
and

     

    WHEREAS, the Board has
delegated the power and authority to execute this Second Amendment to the
undersigned officer of the Company.

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
that, effective as of the date set forth below, the Plan be and is hereby
amended by deleting the first sentence of Section 3 of the Plan and replacing it
with the following new sentence:

     

    “Subject
to Section 14 of the Plan, there shall be reserved for issuance under the Plan
an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of Company Stock, which may be authorized but
unissued shares, or shares held in the Company’s treasury, or shares purchased
from stockholders expressly for use under the Plan.”

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment has been executed this 28th day of
May, 2009.

     

    
      
        
          	 
      	
                  MODIGENE
      INC.

                	 
	 
      	 
      	 
	 
      	
                  /s/
      Shai Novik

                	 
	 
      	
                  Shai
      Novik, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                     9,090
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                              21
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     63,567
<COMMON>                                      (65,424)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,256
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   251
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    128
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                128
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-41071

Summary Calendar

SCOTT SHINE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CHRIS MARS, 

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

Division No. 5:10-CV-128

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Scott Shine appeals the dismissal of his claims under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 for wrongful arrest against defendant Chris Mars. The dismissalfollowed

the district court’s decision that defendant Mars was entitled to qualified

immunity on a motion for summary judgment. We affirm. 

Plaintiff Shine was arrested for selling drugs on two dates, September 4,

2008 and October 28, 2008. The defendant, a Franklin County deputy, made the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 2, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-41071 Document: 00511745719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/02/2012
No. 11-41071

arrest of plaintiff after obtaining a warrant from a judicial officer and after

plaintiff was indicted by a grand jury. These findings of probable cause insulate

Mars from any claim for false arrest, unless he made false statement in his

affidavit which was used to obtain the warrant. Taylor v. Greggs, 36 F.3d 453,

456-57 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court properly found that Shine failed to

identify any falsehood in Deputy Mars’ Affidavit. Neither did he identify any

false information that was presented to the grand jury. Plaintiff’s claim that he

was out of town on the days on which the alleged drug transactions took place

does not alter this analysis as Shine has not shown that Mars was aware of his

whereabouts at the relevant time. 

Accordingly, the district court did not err in granting Mars’ Motion for

Summary Judgment in the issue of qualified immunity. 

AFFIRMED. 

2

Case: 11-41071 Document: 00511745719 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/02/2012
### **Exhibit 31.1**

###  

**PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**UnderRule 13a-14 (a) / 15d-14 (a)**

 

I, Greg D. Forrest,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof XETA Technologies, Inc;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

c)              disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated:  March 5, 2008

 
| /s/ Greg D. Forrest     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Greg D. Forrest         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 15.1











Independent Registered


Public Accounting Firm’s Acknowledgement Letter







To Board of Directors and Stockholders


Northern States Financial Corporation




We are aware of the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8: No. 333-170065) of our report dated November 4, 2010 related to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Northern States Financial Corporation which is included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.




Under Rule 436(c) of the 1933 Act, our report is not a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the 1933 Act.




/s/  Plante & Moran, PLLC


Chicago, Illinois


November 4, 2010