alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Daniel Clark: A Featured Biography

**

----

A New Hampshire Republican, Daniel Clark authored the resolution that expelled ten southern senators for their support of the rebellion during the Civil War. Clark fervently opposed slavery and in 1864 spoke eloquently in support of the constitutional amendment to abolish it: "To restore this Union with slavery in it when we have subdued the rebel armies would be again to build your house on its smoking ruins, when you had not put out the fire which burned it down." His colleagues awarded him the high honor of electing him president pro tempore in 1865-1866. Clark resigned his Senate seat in 1866 to accept an appointment to the U.S. District Court, a position he held until his death in 1891.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Daniel Clark
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theodore A. Babcock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Theodore A. Babcock
|Theodore A. Babcock    
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 3, 2005
# States in the Senate | Virginia Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to 18 USC §1350, the undersigned officer of The St. Joe Company (the “Company”)hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.                                /s/ Anthony M. Corriggio   Anthony M. Corriggio   Chief Financial Officer   Dated:August 8, 2006
# States in the Senate | Hawaii

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Brian Schatz (D)***Hometown: Honolulu*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Mazie K. Hirono (D)***Hometown: Honolulu*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Hawaii became the 50th state in the Union on August 21, 1959. The state's first two senators, Hiram Fong and Oren Long, were sworn into office on August 24, 1959. Hiram Fong was the first Asian Pacific American elected to the Senate. Hawaii's longest-serving senator, and the second longest-serving senator in Senate history, is Daniel Inouye (1963-2012). Inouye served as the Senate president pro tempore from 2010 to 2012 and as his party's conference secretary from 1977 to 1989. 

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
#### C. Lansing Jones, as Substituted Trustee under the Will of George W. Dodge, Deceased, Respondent, v. Sarah G. Bevillard, Appellant, Impleaded with Grace Harry and Others.

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs.

All concurred.
#### Patrick M. Herron and Others, Respondents, v. The Scofield Company and Others, Impleaded with David D. Allerton and Others, as Receivers in Bankruptcy of The Scofield Company, and The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 27629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11945]



[[Page 27627]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of May 13, 2010--Continuation of the National Emergency With 
Respect to Burma


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 27629]]

                Notice of May 13, 2010

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Burma

                On May 20, 1997, the President issued Executive Order 
                13047, certifying to the Congress under section 570(b) 
                of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and 
                Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 
                104-208), that the Government of Burma had committed 
                large-scale repression of the democratic opposition in 
                Burma after September 30, 1996, thereby invoking the 
                prohibition on new investment in Burma by United States 
                persons contained in that section. The President also 
                declared a national emergency to deal with the threat 
                posed to the national security and foreign policy of 
                the United States by the actions and policies of the 
                Government of Burma, invoking the authority, inter 
                alia, of the International Emergency Economic Powers 
                Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.

                Because the actions and policies of the Government of 
                Burma continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security and foreign policy of 
                the United States, the national emergency declared on 
                May 20, 1997, and the measures adopted on that date, on 
                July 28, 2003, in Executive Order 13310, on October 18, 
                2007, in Executive Order 13448, and on April 30, 2008, 
                in Executive Order 13464 to deal with that emergency, 
                must continue in effect beyond May 20, 2010. Therefore, 
                in accordance with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year the national emergency with respect to 
                Burma. This notice shall be published in the Federal 
                Register and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    May 13, 2010.

[FR Doc. 2010-11945
Filed 5-14-10; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3195-W0-P
S. 2425

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to participate in the planning, design,

and construction of the Bend Feed Canal Pipeline Project, Oregon, and for other

purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bend Feed Canal Pipeline Project

Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL PARTICIPATION.

(a) The Secretary of the Interior, in cooperation with the Tumalo

Irrigation District (referred to in this section as the ‘‘District’’),

is authorized to participate in the planning, design, and construction

of the Bend Feed Canal Pipeline Project, Oregon.

(b) The Federal share of the costs of the project shall not

exceed 50 percent of the total, and shall be nonreimbursable. The

District shall receive credit from the Secretary toward the District’s

share of the project for any funds the District has provided toward

the design, planning or construction prior to the enactment of

this Act.

(c) Funds received under this Act shall not be considered a

supplemental or additional benefit under the Act of June 17, 1902

(82 Stat. 388) and all Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary

thereto.

(d) Title to facilities constructed under this Act will be held

by the District.

(e) Operations and maintenance of the facilities will be the

responsibility of the District.
S. 2425—2

(f) There are authorized to be appropriated $2,500,000 for the

Federal share of the activities authorized under this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         1
<RECEIVABLES>                                      342
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   655
<PP&E>                                           4,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              621
<BONDS>                                          1,464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,958
<SALES>                                            571
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   571
<CGS>                                              423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (158)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    177
<INCOME-TAX>                                        70
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                107
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       107
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.89
        

</TABLE>
#### The Vogt Manufacturing and Coach Lace Company, Respondent, *v.*Carl Oettinger, Appellant.

*Costs upon an issue of law,*discretionary— *their amount.*

Where an issue of fact and an issue of law. are joined between the same parties to the same action, and the issue of fact remains undisposed of, hut the issue of law is decided, costs are allowable in the discretion of the court; but, if awarded, their amount is governed by the provision of section 8251 of the Code of Civil Procedure as follows: “For the trial of an issue of law twenty dollars.”

*53Appeal by the defendant, Carl Oettinger, from an order of tbe County Court of Monroe county, entered in the office of the clerk of Monroe county on the 21st day of December, 1894, denying his motion for an order amending a decision upon a demurrer by striking from it *“*$10.00” and causing it to read, *“*Demurrer sustained and said second cause of action in plaintiff’s complaint dismissed, with costs of demurrer against plaintiff to be taxed by the clerk of this court.”

*George M.*Williams, for the appellant.

*Frcrnk M. Goff,*for the respondent.

Lewis, J.:

There was a joinder of an issue of law and an issue of fact in this action between the same parties; the issue of law was tried and decided while the issue of fact was still undisposed of. Whether the successful party should have costs of the demurrer was a matter in the discretion of the court. (§ 3232, Code Civ. Proc.)

The trial court exercised its discretion in favor of the party demurring and decided that he was entitled to costs. The decision was as follows : “ Demurrer sustained and said, second cause of action in plaintiff’s complaint dismissed, with $10.00 costs against plaintiff.” The defendant moved the court to correct its decision by striking out the words “$10.00;” the motion was denied. The court having determined that the defendant was entitled to costs, he was, we think, entitled to the statutory costs.

We do not see upon what theory the court could arbitrarily fix any different amount. It is provided by section 3251 of the Code that costs awarded to a party to an action must be at the following ;-ates : *“*For the trial of an issue of law twenty dollars,” etc. ( *Van Gelder*v. *Van*Gelder, 13 Hun, 118.),

• The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for the modification of the decision granted.

Dwight, P. *J.,*Bradley and Ward, JJ., concurred.

Ordered reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion to modify the decision granted. •
v150341_10-31x2 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing




Exhibit 10.31.2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51158

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANGEL HERNANDEZ-SANTA CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-1003-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Angel HernandezSanta Cruz raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
# Hiram Bingham: A Featured Biography

**

----

How many U.S. senators have been credited with rediscovering an ancient civilization? One—Hiram Bingham. An archaeologist, explorer, aviator, author, and senator from Connecticut, Bingham organized the Yale Peruvian Expedition. In 1911, guided by local farmers atop a Peruvian mountain, Bingham came upon the ruins of Machu Picchu. He led further expeditions for the National Geographic Society and published several books, including *Lost City of the Incas*(1948). After brief service as governor of Connecticut, he was elected as a Republican to the U.S. Senate. He served from 1924 until 1933, in a term marred by his censure in 1929 for allowing a lobbyist to attend a closed committee meeting.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
#### Charles E. Bryant & Co. v. Arnold.

Conflicting -testimony 'will be examined only to determine whether there .is probative evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict...

(Opinion filed January 25, 1905.)

, Appeal from circuit court, Beadle county; Hon. Charles S.-Whiting, Judge.

Action by Charles E. Bryant *&*Co., a corporation,, against *107M. D. Arnold. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*Wood &*Fairhanh, for appellant.

*W. A. Lynch,*for respondent.

Puller, J.

Answering the complaint'in this acii'on to recover damages for an alleged wrongful attachment and,' byway-of counterclaim, the defendant alleged facts sufficient to show a legal claim in his favor against plaintiff for $145 as commission for the sale of real property, and this appeal is from a judgment in his favor and from an order denying a.new trial.

Whether the parties entered into an agreement by the terms of which respondent was entitled to a Commission for producing,a purchaser who actually bought the' property is the.only question in the case, and it is conceded by counsel for appellant that the evidence is conflicting upon every material -point. In this jurisdiction it has been uniformly held from the beginning that conflicting testimony upon which a verdict rests will not be weighed, and its examination on appeal extends no further than is necessary to determine the question whether there is probative evidence sufficient to sustain-such verdict. ’’ Franz Falk Brewing Co. v. Mielenz Bros., 5 Dak. 136, 37 N. W. 728; Jeansch v. Lewis, 1 S. D. 609, 48 N. W. 128; Cannon v. Deming, 3 S. D. 421, 53 N. W. 863; Bedow v. Tonkin, 5 S. D. 432, 59 N. W. 222; Bennett v. Chicago, Mil. & St. P. Ry. Co., 8 S. D. 394, 66 N. W. 934; Weiss v. Evans, 13 S. D. 185, 82 N. W. 388.

As no errors of law occurred at the trial, and sufficient evidence was introduced and fairly submitted to the .jury .under proper instructions, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10851

Summary Calendar

MICHAEL WAYNE BOHANNAN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CV-662

Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Wayne Bohannan,Texas prisoner # 1841746, was convicted of two

counts of aggravated rape with a deadly weapon, and he instituted the instant

28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceedings to challenge, among other things, a revocation of

his release. This court granted Bohannan a certificate of appealability (COA) on

whether the extension of his discharge date was a collateral consequence

sufficient to maintain his § 2254 challenge to his revocation. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 26, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-10851 Document: 00512288710 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2013
No. 12-10851

Bohannan has since been convicted on a new charge and is currently

under the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional

Institutions Division, serving a life sentence. Because Bohannan’s new

conviction and concomitant incarceration effectively terminated his release, this

action no longer presents a live case or controversy.1 See Tex. Gov’t Code

§ 508.001(5); Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 12–13 (1998); United States v.

Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847–48 (5th Cir. 1999). We decline to consider the

Respondent’s timeliness argument because no COA was issued on it. See

Simmons v. Epps, 654 F.3d 526, 535 (5th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 2374

(2012). We also deny Bohannan’s motion to strike Respondent’s brief.

DISMISSED as MOOT; MOTION DENIED.

1 Even assuming, arguendo,that Bohannan’s new life sentence does not moot his § 2254

challenge to his revocation, we would nonetheless affirm the district court’s denial of relief

because Bohannan’s previously scheduled release date would have passed before he could

obtain a new revocation hearing. See United States v. Kirklin, 701 F.3d 177, 179 (5th Cir.

2012). In Kirklin, a direct appeal from the revocation of supervised release, we declined to

grant relief on a plain sentencing error after concluding that the error did not affect Kirklin’s

substantial rights because he was scheduled for release in less than thirty days. Id. We

explained that “[b]y the time it would be possible for Kirklin to be given a new sentencing

hearing, even more time would have passed.” Id. at 179–80. Similarly, here, Bohannan’s

previously scheduled release is due to expire in approximately two weeks, on July 9, 2013, and

by the time he could obtain a new hearing even more time would have passed.

2

 Case: 12-10851 Document: 00512288710 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2013
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SIGA Technologies,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Thomas  N.
Konatich.,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

March 28, 2006

                                                /S/ Thomas N. Konatich
                                                --------------------------
                                                Thomas N. Konatich
                                                Chief Financial Officer