alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            27,977
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         828
<MORTGAGE>                                         574
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       83
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  31,886
<CASH>                                              62
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               9,153
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,274
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 29,589
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              4,166
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   2,019
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  1,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              900
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,274
<PREMIUMS>                                       7,796
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,100
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 143
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     412
<BENEFITS>                                       5,947
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,197
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             1,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                       494
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.42
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  30,138
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              6,057
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                (323)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               2,352
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 4,025
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 29,411
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          (252)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                       FNB FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

                         ------------------------------

                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

                         ------------------------------

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Ernest J. Sewell, Chief Executive
Officer, and Michael W. Shelton, Chief Financial Officer, of FNB Financial
Services Corporation ("FNB"), hereby certifies, to his or her knowledge, that:

      1)    FNB's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
            2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in FNB's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
            the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FNB.

      EXECUTED this 12th day of August, 2003.


                                          /s/ Ernest J. Sewell
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Ernest J. Sewell,
                                           Chief Executive Officer of
                                           FNB Financial Services Corporation


                                          /s/ Michael W. Shelton
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Michael W. Shelton,
                                           Chief Financial Officer of
                                           FNB Financial Services Corporation


                                       25
v150341_10-41 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.41
# Jacob Javits: A Featured Biography

**

----

Jacob Javits, Republican senator from New York from 1957 to 1981, was known for his work ethic and unbounded energy. A self-described “Lincolnian,” Javits championed the rights of the average American, often supporting federal spending on health care, education, housing, and the arts and humanities. An ardent proponent of civil rights, Javits played a key role in the Senate’s passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. He opposed gender discrimination and became one of the first senators to sponsor a female page in 1971. Javits also held a keen interest in world affairs. His growing disillusionment over the war in Vietnam led him to draft the 1973 War Powers Act. He also helped facilitate the 1976 Camp David Agreement. Seeking a fifth term at the age of 76, Javits was defeated in the 1980 New York Republican primary. 

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
**Exhibit 15**

 

Alfa Corporation

Birmingham, Alabama 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

 

Re: Registration Statement No. 33-83134 on Form S-3 and 33-77916 and 33-76460 on Form S-8 

 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge ourawareness of the use therein of our report dated May 9, 2003, related to our review of interim financial information. 

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, our report dated April 16, 2003 related to our review of interim financial information is notconsidered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of section 7 and 11 of the Act. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia  

May 9, 2003
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2535

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pendimethalin.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10, 2000

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pendimethalin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PENDIMETHALIN.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.21.42 N-(Ethylpropyl)-

3,4-dimethyl-2,6-

dinitroaniline

(Pendimethalin)

(CAS No.

40487–42–1)

(provided for in

subheading

2921.42.90) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•S 2535 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

 

I, Brenda C. Rhodes, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K/A of Hall, Kinion & Associates, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure conrols and procedures to be desinged under our supervisionto ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in the report any change in registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6106

ANTHONY LEON HOOVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER; TODD L. BURKE,

Judge; ELIZABETH TOOMES; PANSY D. GLANTOR,

Assistant District Attorney; CLYDE SOUTHERN,

JR., Probation Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-04-862)

Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 18, 2005

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal the district court’s

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing

his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the

district court. See Hoover v. Office of the Public Defender, No.

CA-04-862 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2005). We also deny Hoover’s motion

for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II

★(Star Print)

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2458

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1818 Milton Avenue in Janesville, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Les Aspin Post

Office Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 25, 2000

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself and Mr. KOHL) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 1818 Milton Avenue in Janesville, Wisconsin,

as the ‘‘Les Aspin Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LES ASPIN POST OFFICE

4 BUILDING.

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

6 Postal Service located at 1818 Milton Avenue in Janes7 ville, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the

8 ‘‘Les Aspin Post Office Building’’.
2

•S 2458 IS1S

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Les Aspin Post Office

5 Building’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Application of Charles O. Roberts and Others for the Removal of Thomas J. Acheson as Supervisor of the Town of Philadelphia, Jefferson County, New York.

Report of the referee confirmed, the said Thomas J. Acheson removed from his office of supervisor, and the town board directed to audit and pay as town charges the fees and disbursements of the referee and the stenographer’s fees, and have recourse therefor to the said Thomas J. Acheson.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AT AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       475
<INVENTORY>                                      5,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,899
<PP&E>                                          15,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,712
<BONDS>                                         13,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           357
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,374
<SALES>                                         19,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,455
<CGS>                                           14,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   789
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    135
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 94
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        94
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.00
        

</TABLE>
DISSENT and Opinion Filed August 27, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-01141-CV

CITY OF SAGINAW, TEXAS, Appellant

V.

BRANDON CRUZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-19227

DISSENTING OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Partida-Kipness, and Nowell

Dissenting Opinion by Justice Schenck

I regret that I am unable to join the majority in its conclusion to affirm the 

denial of the City’s plea to the jurisdiction.

The majority cites Bland Independent School District v. Blue for the general 

proposition that the purpose of a plea to the jurisdiction is to “defeat a cause of action 

without regard to whether the claims asserted have merit.” 34 S.W.3d 547, 554 (Tex. 

2000). Bland was a taxpayer standing case. As we have noted in the past, standing 

and other general jurisdiction challenges are quite different from jurisdictional 

challenges under the Texas Tort Claims Act, which makes the waiver of immunity 
–2–

to suit “co-extensive with liability.” City of Dallas v. E. Vill. Ass’n, 480 S.W.3d 37, 

46 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2015, pet. denied).

I believe the Texas Supreme Court and this Court have thus adopted a 

different scope of inquiry in these cases, see Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife 

v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004), because the Texas Tort Claims Act 

waives immunity from suit but only “to the extent of liability created by [the 

Act].” E. Vill. Ass’n, 480 S.W.3d at 46 (quoting TEX.CIV. PRAC. &REM.CODE ANN.

§ 101.025(a)). The Texas Tort Claims Act expressly waives sovereign immunity in 

three areas: “use of publicly owned automobiles, premises defects, and injuries 

arising out of conditions or use of property.” Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 224. Texas 

courts have held that where a special defect exists, the State owes the same duty to 

warn as a private landowner owes to an invitee, one that requires the State to use 

ordinary care to protect an invitee from a dangerous condition of which the owner is 

or reasonably should be aware. See Reyes v. City of Laredo, 335 S.W.3d 605, 606–

07 (Tex. 2010) (per curiam). Accordingly, the immunity waiver under the Texas 

Tort Claims Act is intertwined with the merits of a claim under that act. Id.

In this case, the record contains no evidence of the nature of the defect, actual 

knowledge of the defect, how long the defect existed, or that a reasonable inspection 

would have discovered the defect. Thus, the majority opinion appears to conclude 

the City is strictly liable for the alleged defect that caused appellee’s injuries. Cf. 

CMH Homes, Inc. v. Daenen, 15 S.W.3d 97, 102–03 (Tex. 2000) (holding 
–3–

constructive knowledge in premises cases can be established by showing condition 

existed long enough for owner or occupier to have discovered it upon reasonable 

inspection); Tex. Dep’t of Transp. v. Jackson, 528 S.W.3d 598, 608 (Tex. App.—El 

Paso 2017, pet. denied).

Because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion, I respectfully dissent.

191141DF.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**JEFFREY JAMES BAXTER, SR.**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 166 DB 2015 (No. 79 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 90186** 

**(Out of State)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25 th**  **day of November, 2015, the Report and Recommendati on**  **of Disciplinary Board Member dated November 16, 2015, is approved and it is**  **ORDERED that Jeffrey James Baxter, Sr., who has been on Inactive Status, has never**  **been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral**  **qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ORELLANA COTO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-74098

Agency No. A094-454-080

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 15, 2016**

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Orellana Coto, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal 

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 25 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 13-74098

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 

2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that even if Orellana 

Coto was credible, he failed to establish past persecution or a clear probability of 

future persecution on account of a protected ground. See Parussimova v. 

Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 741 (9th Cir. 2009) (under the REAL ID Act, “to 

demonstrate that a protected ground was ‘at least one central reason’ for 

persecution, an applicant must prove that such ground was a cause of the 

persecutors’ acts”). Thus, Orellana Coto’s withholding of removal claim fails. 

See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010). 

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of Orellana Coto’s CAT 

claim because he failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured 

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El 

Salvador. See Silaya, 524 F.3d at 1073. We reject Orellana Coto’s contention 

that the BIA did not consider his claim properly.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.