alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          26,743
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             106
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,664
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    178,110
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,165
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            34,222
<LOANS>                                        494,844
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 778,774
<DEPOSITS>                                     653,763
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,693
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,198
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,665
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 778,774
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,747
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,683
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   316
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,746
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,709
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,084
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,662
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      315
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,391
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,763
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,763
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.25
<LOANS-NON>                                        550
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,437
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    28
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,572
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      231
<RECOVERIES>                                        90
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,747
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               316
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27551-27552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-1090-000]


Commercial Energy of Montana, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

May 10, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Commercial Energy of Montana, Inc.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 31, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.

[[Page 27552]]

    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eea8abbcada1808287808bbd9b9e9e819c9aae888b9c8dc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fdbbb8afbeb29391949398ae888d8d928f89bd9b988f9ed39a928b">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11628 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
99th Congress, 2d Session House Document 99-276

VETO OF H.R. 2787

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

HIS VETO OF H.R. 2787, A BILL TO EXTEND THROUGH FISCAL 

YEAR 1988 SBA PILOT PROGRAMS UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE 

SMALL BUSINESS ACT

O c to b er 7, 1986.—Message and accompanying bill referred to the 

Committee on Small Business and ordered to be printed

91-011 O

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 1986
To the House of Representatives:

I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 2787. Title I 

of this bill would reauthorize and extend through September 30, 

1988, two Small Business Administration (SBA) pilot programs, and 

Title II would authorize the appropriation of $10 million for the establishment of a new Technology Transfer Institute in Bridgeport, 

Connecticut.

The appropriation authorization of $10 million for a new Federally assisted project is inappropriate and unwarranted at a time 

when there is a critical need to operate within severe budgetary 

constraints and to fund adequately higher priority programs. Although the stated purpose of the proposed Institute would be to 

“revitalize the competitiveness of small business industry in America, particularly in the international marketplace, and to serve as a 

regional demonstration center transferring emerging technology 

. . .,” it is not clear that the Institute would provide the best 

means to accomplish this goal.

Additionally, in light of current budgetary constraints, it is particularly unfortunate that the bill accords special treatment to a 

specific institution and does not require selection on a competitive 

basis. Selecting recipients competitively helps to ensure that the 

taxpayers' money is spent on projects that address an acknowledged need and demonstrate the greatest promise of success. Legislative provisions that accord special treatment to certain applicants 

or, as here, identify the sole recipient of assistance are particularly 

objectionable. I am concerned also that the Institute, proposed as a 

“regional demonstration center," would set an undesirable precedent for the noncompetitive establishment of additional regional 

centers, without a demonstrated need for a Federal role in this 

area.

Finally, I note that Title I of the bill would unnecessarily extend 

two SBA pilot programs. The goal of the pilot procurement program can be accomplished under existing authorities. The extension of the surety bond waiver program provided in Title I has 

proved unnecessary, as no waivers have been requested since the 

program was first authorized in 1978.

Ronald Reagan.

The White House, October 7f 1986\

(l)
# Treaties with Floor Status Actions in the Current Congress

**

----

```



                        TREATIES WITH FLOOR STATUS ACTIONS 
                              IN THE CURRENT CONGRESS


**********************************************************************************

TREATY DOCUMENT NUMBER: 112-8
TRANSMITTED TO SENATE: May 17, 2012
TREATY TYPE: Taxation
FORMAL TITLE:
The Convention between the  Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of  the Republic of Chile for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and  the 
Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income  and Capital, signed 
in Washington on February 4, 2010, with a  Protocol signed the same day, as 
corrected by exchanges of notes  effected February 25, 2011, and February 10 and 
21, 2012, and a  related agreement effected by exchange of notes (the "related  
Agreement") on February 4, 2010.
   Jun 22, 23     Resolution of advice and consent to ratification agreed to in 
                  Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 95 - 2. Record Vote Number: 172.
   Jun 22, 23     Considered by Senate.
   Jun 21, 23     By unanimous consent agreement, debate 6/22/2023.
   Jun 21, 23     Considered by Senate.
   Jun 21, 23     Cloture invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 97 - 2. Record Vote 
                  Number: 170.
   Jun 15, 23     By unanimous consent agreement, mandatory quorum required under 
                  Rule XXII waived.
   Jun 15, 23     Cloture motion presented in Senate.
   Jun 15, 23     Treaty moved through its parliamentary stages up to and 
                  including presentation of the resolution of advice and consent 
                  to ratification.
   Jun 15, 23     Motion to proceed to executive session to consideration of 
                  treaty agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
   Jun 06, 23     Reported by Senator Menendez, Committee on Foreign Relations 
                  with printed Ex. Rept. 118-1 and a resolution of advice and 
                  consent to ratification with 2 reservations and 2 declarations. 
                  Executive Calendar No. 1.
```

|   |
|--------|

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Treaties 

Learn more about the Senate's Treaty making powers.

### State Department 

Information about treaty actions that take place before the president submits a treaty to the Senate may be available from this site maintained by the Office of Treaty Affairs at the State Department.

### Related Links 

If you would like to learn more about treaties visit  About Treaties and the Legislation & Records Treaties web pages.
The Honorable Richard H. Battey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1 the District of South Dakota.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1646

___________ Allen K. Weber, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner * District of South Dakota of Social Security, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 17, 1998 Filed: January 7, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

___________ McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Allen K. Weber

appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota granting summary judgment in favor of th e

1 Commis sioner of Social Security and affirming the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) denying Weber disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act,2–

42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433. Weber v. Apfel , No. CIV 97-5055 (D.S.D. Jan. 20, 1998 ) (memorandum opinion and order) (he reinafter “slip op.”). For reversal, Weber argues that t he district court erred in holding that substantial evidence in the administrativ e record supports the ALJ’s decision. Jurisdictio n

in the district court was proper based on 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
. Jur isdictionin this court is proper based on 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The notice of appea l was timely filed pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). We have carefull y reviewed the administrative record, the district court’s wellreasoned opinion, and the parties’ arguments on appeal. Upon review, we find n o merit to Weber’s specifi c arguments that the ALJ erred as a matter of law in failing to co nsider deposition testimony provided by Weber’s treating physician and that th e ALJ’s credibility determination s are not supported by the record. As the district court observed, the ALJ may well have considered the treating physician’s depositio n testimony but chose not to discuss it. Slip op. at 14. “In denying disability [benefits], the ALJ does not have to discu ss every piece of evidence presented, but must develop the record fu lly and fairly.” Miller v. Shalala , 8 F.3d 611, 613 (8th Cir. 1993) (pe r curiam) (cit

ing Walker v. Bowen , 834 F.2d 635 (7th Cir. 1987)). Moreover, the ALJ was warr anted in discrediting some of the treating physician’s opinions, as well a s certain a spects of Weber’s and his wife’s testimony, in light of other inconsistent o r contradictory evidence in the record. These conclusions have been thoroughl y explained by the district court and require no further discussion. In sum, we hold in the present case that the record has been fully and fairl y developed by the ALJ and that there is substantial evidence in the record as a whol e to support the ALJ’s decision. The order of the dis trict court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.3–

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 29, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00549-CV

ABDUL ZAVERI, Appellant

V.

FONDREN SOUTHWEST TEMPOS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-57726

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed April 1, 2015. No clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On August 20, 2015, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally and Wise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 6/30/98
     BALANCE SHEETS AND  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED
     IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000742685
<NAME>                        THE CHALONE WINE GROUP, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            177
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                       90
<INVENTORY>                                    35,185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,145
<PP&E>                                         31,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                    464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 90,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,569
<BONDS>                                         8,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       48,857
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   90,999
<SALES>                                         8,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                9,339
<CGS>                                           4,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,220
<INCOME-TAX>                                      500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               720
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      720
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.08
        


</TABLE>
# Benjamin Wade: A Featured Biography

**

----

Ohioan Benjamin Wade was one of the most influential members of the Civil War and Reconstruction-era Senate. Like his Radical Republican colleagues, Wade supported the abolition of slavery and called for civil rights for freedmen. He chaired the Joint Committee on the Conduct of War, which analyzed a broad range of issues, including Union military losses, the mistreatment of Union prisoners by Confederate forces, and the massacre of Cheyenne Indians. He co-authored the Wade-Davis Bill with Representative Henry Davis of Maryland to provide for the readmission to representation of rebel states upon meeting certain conditions, such as providing African American men the right to vote. President Lincoln pocket-vetoed the bill, preferring a more moderate reconstruction plan. Elected president pro tempore by the Senate in 1867, Wade was the next in line of presidential succession during President Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
Exhibit 11


                             CityFed Financial Corp.
              Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Loss




                                                     Six Months Ended
                                                     ----------------
                                                          June 30,
                                                          --------

                                                   2000              1999
                                                   ----              ----
 Computation of Loss Per Share:


 Weighted average number of shares
    outstanding                                  18,715,609         18,715,609

 Loss applicable to  common stock:(1)


   From continuing operations                   $(4,241,000)       $(4,212,000)
                                                ============       ============

   From discontinued operations                 $(1,037,000)       $          -
                                                ============       ============

   Net loss                                     $(5,278,000)       $(4,212,000)
                                                ============       ============


 Basic loss per share:


   From continuing operations                        $(0.23)            $(0.23)
                                                     =======            =======

   From discontinued operations                      $(0.05)            $     -
                                                     =======            =======

   Net loss                                          $(0.28)            $(0.23)
                                                     =======            =======

                          ___________________________

(1) Losses  applicable to Common Stock are net of preferred  stock dividends for
the six months ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 in the amount of $4,317,000.

                                       22
null

2010-02-01

476.91156

eng - Argued: 2010-02-01. Docket number: 5-08-0501
# Oliver Ellsworth: A Featured Biography

**

----

One of the most influential senators of the First Federal Congress, Oliver Ellsworth was the principal author of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established the federal judiciary and shaped the Supreme Court. Having served in the Connecticut assembly and the Continental Congress, Ellsworth represented Connecticut at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, where he orchestrated the “Great Compromise” that saved the convention from deadlock. Two years later, he became one of Connecticut’s first two senators. Highly esteemed by his fellow senators, Ellsworth devoted his service in the Senate to implementing the new Constitution and making the new government work. In 1796 President George Washington nominated Ellsworth as chief justice of the United States. John Adams later described Ellsworth as "the firmest pillar" of the federal government during its earliest years.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Oliver Ellsworth
ex41.htm


                                                                         EXHIBIT
4.1

    


    BHAKTI
CAPITAL CORP.


    A FLORIDA
CORPORATION


    100,000,000
SHARES COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE


    


    This
certifies that _________________________________________________ is hereby
issued ____________________________________________________ fully paid and
non-assessable Shares of Common Stock of Bhakti Capital Corp., transferable on
the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly
authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

    


    In
Witness Whereof, Alchemical Capital Corp. has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed as of this ______day of  __________ 20_____ .  

    
 

    
      
        
          
            
              
                	 	 	 
	
                        President

                      	 	
                        Secretary