alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **Exhibit31.2**

###  

**PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert B. Wagner,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XETA Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Dated:  February 28, 2006

 

 
| /s/ Robert B.  Wagner   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert B. Wagner        |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1010077                     
<NAME>                        Karts International Incorporated     
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                               
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         163690
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3401207
<ALLOWANCES>                                   90500
<INVENTORY>                                    2129949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4858972
<PP&E>                                         2188938
<DEPRECIATION>                                 288741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7424960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5250806
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5474
<OTHER-SE>                                     1802399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7424960
<SALES>                                        8219646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8219646
<CGS>                                          8845004
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3359637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6102640)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               87500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             92416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10087635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14760
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10072875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10072875)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.05)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11723]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Notice of Reestablishment of the Secretary of Energy Advisory 
Board

    Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act and in accordance with title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 
section 102-3, and following consultation with the Committee Management 
Secretariat of the General Services Administration, notice is hereby 
given that the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (the Board) has been 
reestablished for a two-year period.
    The Board will provide independent, balanced, and authoritative 
advice to the Secretary of Energy on matters concerning the 
Department's management, basic science, research, development and 
technology activities; energy and national security responsibilities; 
environmental cleanup activities; energy-related economic activities; 
and the operations of the Department.
    The Board members are selected to assure well-balanced geographical 
representation and on the basis of their broad competence in areas 
relating to quality management, basic science, renewable energy, energy 
policy, environmental science, economics, and broad public policy 
interests. Membership of the Board will continue to be determined in 
accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463) and implementing regulations.
    The reestablishment of the Board has been determined to be in the 
public interest, important and vital to the conduct of the Department's 
business in connection with the performance of duties established by 
statute for the Department of Energy. The Board will operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), the General Services Administration Final Rule on 
Federal Advisory Committee Management, and other directives and 
instructions issued in implementation of those acts.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Bodette, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Washington, DC 20585, telephone: 202-586-6210.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 12, 2010.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-11723 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
v150341_10-62 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.62
#### In the Matter of Henry E. Hoyt, an Attorney.

Proceedings dismissed. Order to be settled on notice.
EXHIBIT 15



Letter Regarding Unaudited

Interim Financial Information



Alfa Corporation

Montgomery, Alabama



Ladies and Gentlemen:



|Re: |  | Registration Statement No. 33-83134 on Form S-3 and 33-77916 and 33-76460 on Form S-8
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated August 7, 2003,
related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436
under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), our report dated August 7, 2003 related to our review of interim financial information is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



KPMG LLP



Atlanta, Georgia

August 7, 2003
### In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_________________________

No. 06

- 11

- 00244

- CR

______________________________

MISTY LAVERNA DALE MAYO

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26,277

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Misty Laverna Dale Mayo entered an open plea of guilty to all fourteen charges spread

across five cases tried together in Hunt County, Texas. The multiple counts included charges for

injury to a child, indecency with a c hild by contact, sexual assault of a child, and aggravated

sexual assault of a child. 1 The trial court accepted her plea, found her guilty on all counts, and

ultimately sentenced her to various terms of confinement ranging from ten to fifty years each.

A fter finding errors in the judgments regarding whether the sentences for the eight charges

contained in the last two cases were to be served concurrently or consecutively, the trial court

attempted to correct the errors by entering nunc pro tunc judgments with revised sentencing

instructions.

1 The five cases before us on appeal, all resolved by opinions issued today, are as follows:

Appeal Case

Number Trial Case

Number Count: Offense Sentence Sentence

Group

06

- 11

- 00243

- CR 26,276 Count 1: injury to a child 10 years

A Count 2: injury to a child 10 years

06

- 11

- 00244

- CR 26,277 Count 1: injury to a child 10 years

Count 2: injury to a child 10 years

06

- 11

- 00245

- CR 26,278 Count 1: aggravated sexual assault of a child 50 years

Count 2: aggravated sexual assault of a child 50 years

06

- 11

- 00246

- CR 26,279 Count 1: indecency with a child by contact 20 years

B Count 2: indecency with a child by contact 20 years

Count 3: aggravated sexual assault of a child 50 years

Count 4: aggravated sexual assault of a child 50 years

06

- 11

- 00247

- CR 26,303 Count 1: indecency with a child by contact 20 years

C Count 2: sexual assault of a child 50 years

Count 3: sexual assault of a child 50 years

Count 4: sexual assault of a child 50 years3

Here, Mayo appeals from her two convictions in trial court cause number 26,277. After

reviewing the record and the briefs in this case, we find that Mayo failed to raise a point of error

regarding these convictions.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial cou rt’s judgment.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: June 4, 2012

Date Decided: June 7 , 2012

Do Not Publish
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAVIER JIMENEZ-JIMENEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-265

[April 11, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 472010CF000203C.

Javier Jimenez-Jimenez, Perry, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8041

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. LEMONZE E. FORD, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (7:03-cr-01094-HFF-14; 7:06-cv-02148-HFF)

Submitted: December 1, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemonze E. Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Lemonze E. Ford seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2000 & Supp. 2008) motion. For the reasons that follow, we remand to the district

court. In civil cases in which the United States or its officer or agency is a party, parties have sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4( a)(1)(B). A district court may extend the time to appeal upon a motion filed within thirty days after expiration of the prescribed time and a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of

Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was filed and entered on its docket on July 10, 2008. The district court received Ford’s notice of appeal on September 22, 2008, which was after the sixty-day appeal period expired but before the expiration of the thirty-day excusable neglect period. In his notice of appeal, Ford stated that he received the July 10 order “several weeks late,” and he requests permission to file a “timely notice” of appeal. We liberally construe Ford’s pro se filing as a motion for an extension of time to file his appeal.

23 Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period and because the district court has not ruled on the motion for extension, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of enabling the district court to determine whether Ford has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the sixty-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REMANDED
| Name of      Subsidiary                                                                      |   | State of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| First Professionals Insurance      Company, Inc. (“First Professionals”)    |   | Florida           |
| Anesthesiologists Professional      Assurance Company                                   |   | Florida           |
| FPIC Insurance Agency,      Inc.                                                   |   | Florida           |
| The Tenere Group, Inc. (“Tenere”)      (100% owned by First Professionals)  |   | Missouri          |
| Intermed Insurance Company      (“Intermed”) (100% owned by Tenere)    |   | Missouri          |
| Trout Insurance Services, Inc.      (100% owned by Intermed)                            |   | Missouri          |
| Interlex Insurance Company (100%      owned by Intermed)                           |   | Missouri          |
| Insurance Services, Inc. (100%      owned by Intermed)                                  |   | Missouri          |
# Cloture Motions - 86th Congress

**

----

|   |  |  |
|--------|--|--|
| From January 7, 1959 through September 1, 1960, 1                    cloture                    motion was                     filed.           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                            |
| Motions             Filed in                 1960                                                                                               | Action             and Result |
| **Date**                                                                                                                                        | **Measure** | **Subject** | **Filed By** | **Date** | **Vote** | **Result** |
| Mar 8                                                                                                                                           | H.R.8315 | Civil Rights bill | Douglas | Mar 10 | 42                            -                            53  No. 112 | F |
|                                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                                                 |
|  **Vote Key:**                    61-32 No. 2 (for example) - tally and Roll Call Vote number; UC - Unanimous                     Consent. |
|  **Result Key:**                    F - Failed; I - Invoked; N - No action; V - Vitiated; W - Withdrawn.                                   |
|                                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                            |

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-04351) pertaining to the NOVA Corporation 1991 Employees Stock
Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan and the NOVA Corporation 1996
Employees Stock Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-
64683) pertaining to the NOVA Corporation 1996 Employees Stock Incentive Plan
and NOVA Corporation Directors Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-64681) pertaining to the PMT Services, Inc. 1997 Nonqualified
Stock Option Plan, 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and 1994
Incentive Stock Plan of our report dated February 19, 1999 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of NOVA Corporation included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 22, 1999
Relocation Payback Agreement between Jeffery J. Kyle and Sensus Metering Systems



 Exhibit 10.36

  

  

Attachment B 
 

 
 RELOCATION PAYBACK AGREEMENT 
 Effective Date of Transfer 12/8/08 
 I, Jeffrey J. Kyle agree to pay back relocation expenses in accordance with
the following guidelines: 
 Termination within 24 months of accepting new assignment 
 If I voluntarily terminate employment or I am involuntarily terminated within the first two years after the transfer date (defined as the commencement of salary at the
destination location), I will repay all relocation benefits previously paid by the Company, according to the following graduated scale. 
  

											
	1st - 12th Month	 	100%	 	17th Month	 	75%	 	22nd Month	 	25%
	13th
Month	 	  95%	 	18th Month	 	65%	 	23rd Month	 	15%
	14th
Month	 	  90%	 	19th Month	 	55%	 	24th Month	 	  5%
	15th
Month	 	  85%	 	20th Month	 	45%	 	25th Month	 	  0%
	16th
Month	 	  80%	 	21st Month	 	35%	 		 	

  

					
	 /s/ Jeffrey J. Kyle
	  	Date	  	    2/16/09                    
	Employee Signature	  		  	
			
	 /s/ Michael DeCocco
	  	Date	  	    2/16/09                    
	Sensus Metering Systems HR Signature	  		  	

 The top portion of this form is to be completed at the time of authorization to move. A copy of the signed form
should be given to the employee. The original should be retained by Sensus Metering Systems’ Human Resource Department. 
 To be filled out at
the time of termination: 
 Date terminated
                     Sensus Metering Systems to be paid back in full by
                                 
 Reason(s)
                                         
                                         
                       
 Sensus Metering
Systems Relocation Payback Agreement Rev. 08-01-08
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                         Washington, D.C. 20549
                                    
                                    
                                FORM 10-Q/A
                                    
                                    
               QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
                 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
     
     
     For Quarter Ended March 31, 1998          Commission File No. 1-8719
                                    
                                    
                                    
                         THE TURNER CORPORATION
     
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
     
     
               DELAWARE                            13-3209884
     
     (State or other jurisdiction of    (I.R.S.Employer Identification No.)
     incorporation or organization)
     
     
     
      375 Hudson Street, New York, New York        10014
     
     (Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)
     
     
     
     Registrant's telephone number, including area code:       (212)229-6000
     
     
     
     
     Indicate  by  check mark whether the registrant (1) has  filed  all
     reports  required  to  be  filed by Section  13  or  15(d)  of  the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months  (or
     for  such shorter period that the registrant was required  to  file
     such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
     for the past 90 days.
     
     Yes [X]    No [   ]
     
     
     
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
     classes of common stock, as of May 6, 1998:  5,379,506