alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

RIN 0648-XV36


Stanford University Habitat Conservation Plan

AGENCIES: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce; Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Interior (DOI).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS and FWS published a notice in the Federal Register on 
April 12, 2010, announcing the availability of the Stanford University 
Habitat Conservation Plan (Plan), the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (DEIS) for Authorization of Incidental Take and 
Implementation of the Plan, and the Implementing Agreement (IA) for 
public review and comment. The document contained incorrect dates and 
contact information.

DATES: This correction is effective May 18, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Stern, 707-575-6060; or Sheila 
Larsen, 916-414-6600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 12, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-8300, on 
page 18483, in the first column, correct the ``DATES'' paragraph to 
read:
DATES: Written comments on the DEIS, Plan, and IA, must be received by 
5 p.m. Pacific Time on July 15, 2010.
    In the same Federal Register notice, on page 18483, in the first 
column, correct the ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' paragraph to 
read:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) Ms. Sheila Larsen, Senior Staff 
Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-
2605, Sacramento, California 95825; telephone 916-414-6600; or (2) Gary 
Stern, San Francisco Bay Region Supervisor, National Marine Fisheries 
Service, 777 Sonoma Avenue, Room 325, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 ; telephone 
707-575-6060.

    Dated: May 11, 2010.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.

    Dated: May 11, 2010.
Alexandra Pitts,
Acting Deputy Region Director, Pacific Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-11852 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODES 3510-22-S, 4310-55-S
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2083

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a uniform dollar

limitation for all types of transportation fringe benefits excludable from

gross income, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 22, 2000

Mr. ROBB (for himself, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. L. CHAFEE, Mr. DODD, Mr.

KERRY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a uniform dollar limitation for all types of transportation

fringe benefits excludable from gross income, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commuter Benefits

5 Equity Act of 2000’’.
2

•S 2083 IS

1 SEC. 2. UNIFORM DOLLAR LIMITATION FOR ALL TYPES OF

2 TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFITS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

4 132(f)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

5 to limitation on exclusion) is amended by striking ‘‘$65’’

6 and inserting ‘‘$175’’.

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 9010 of the

8 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century is amend9 ed by striking subsection (c).

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

12 December 31, 1999.

13 SEC. 3. CASH PAYMENT TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FOR

14 PARKING SPACES.

15 Section 7905 of title 5, United States Code, is

16 amended—

17 (1) in subsection (a)—

18 (A) in paragraph (2)(C) by inserting

19 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon;

20 (B) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘; and’’

21 and inserting a period; and

22 (C) by striking paragraph (4); and

23 (2) in subsection (b)(2)—

24 (A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read

25 as follows:
3

•S 2083 IS

1 ‘‘(A) a qualified transportation fringe as

2 defined in section 132(f)(1) of the Internal Rev3 enue Code of 1986;’’;

4 (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘and’’

5 after the semicolon;

6 (C) in subparagraph (C) by striking the

7 period and inserting a semicolon and ‘‘and’’;

8 and

9 (D) by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(D) taxable cash payment to an employee

11 in lieu of an agency-provided parking space.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.9





FPIC Insurance Group,
Inc.





Executive Incentive


Compensation Plan





Summary of 2009 Implementation
Guide








Plan
Description


Under this plan, the Compensation
Committee of the holding company board will establish performance measures and
goal weightings for each year based on synergies and desired focus. The
performance measures will be both quantitative and qualitative in
nature.





Performance
Components


Corporate financial measures will be
based on corporate relevant metrics and operating subsidiary (OS) measures will
be based on OS relevant metrics. Certain senior executives of each OS, including
its CEO, will have a portion of their incentive compensation tied to corporate
performance given the high degree of synergy with corporate
objectives.





The following performance component
weights will apply to the Company’s executive officers for
2009:





Tier
              Corporate
              OS
              IndividualHolding Co. -
      CEO/CFO
              100%
              -
              -OS - CEO
              45%
              35%
              20%








Performance
Targets


Specific targets will be established on
an annual basis for each performance component and will be evaluated on a
sliding scale ranging from 50% of the bonus opportunity to 150% of the bonus
opportunity. Any measure falling below the 50% level will reduce the related
bonus opportunity to 0%.





Individual
Target Bonuses


Target bonuses for the following
executive officers will be as follows (as a percentage of 2009 base
salary):




Tier
                Target Bonus
                  (as % of base
      salary)Holding Co. -
      CEO
                100%Holding Co. -
      CFO
                50%OS - CEO
                50%
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 23

- 00264

- CV

Davario Pegram , Appellant

v. Britney Johnson , Appellee

FROM THE 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 22

- 1657

- F425 , THE HONORABLE BETSY F. LAMBETH , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on May 31, 2023.
O n June 6, 2023, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to h is failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and sub mit a status report regarding this appeal by June 16, 2023. Further, the notice advised appellant that h is failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the
clerk’s record has not been filed.
If a trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing th e record, the appellate court2 may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established that he is entitled to proceed withou t payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 . Because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, we
dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

____________ ______________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Justices Bak er, Triana, and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: August 11, 2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 16-0993

MJS AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., A

TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY

CORPORATION

v.

JUDY MASTER, RN AND

MATTHEW MASTER

§

§

§

§

§

§

Nacogdoches County,

12th District.

October 20, 2017

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under

the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, MJS AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., A TEXAS

LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 30th day of November, 2017.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FiberTower Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Dated:
March 13, 2009

/s/ THOMAS A. SCOTT Thomas A. Scott Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.

---



QuickLinks
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG LLP       o One Houston Center         o Phone:713 750 1500
                                 Suite 2400                   Fax:  713 750 1501
                                 1221 McKinney Street
                                 Houston, Texas 77010-2007



           Report on Management's Assertion on Compliance With Minimum
                      Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
             UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS



Chairman of the Board
Transworld Mortgage Corporation


We have examined  management's  assertion that Transworld  Mortgage  Corporation
(the  "Corporation")  complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM
FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS ("USAP") during the year ended December 31, 1996,  included
in  the  accompanying   report  titled  Report  of  Management.   Management  is
responsible  for the  Corporation's  compliance  with  those  requirements.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on  management's  assertions  about the
Corporation's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the  Corporation's  compliance with
those  requirements  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as we  considered
necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination  provides a
reasonable  basis for our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not  provide a legal
determination on the Corporation's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that the Corporation  complied with the
aforementioned requirements during the period ended December 31, 1996, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

February 14, 1997


       Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
No. 2,034.

#### STATE ex rel CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUTTE, et al., Relators, *v.*DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT et al., Respondents.

Original — Writ of supervisory control.

Decided January 27, 1904.

*Mr. Bernard Noon,*for Relators.

Per Curiam.

The application for a writ of supervisory control, or some other appropriate writ, herein, is hereby denied.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 
 Fiscal Year EndedOctober 27,
    
    
    October 28,
    
    
    October 29,
    
    
    October 30,
    
    
    October 25,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Earnings (loss) from continuing
operations before taxes
    
    $
    144,915
    
    
    $
    98,352
    
    
    $
    55,198
    
    
    $
    (19,624
    )
    
    $
    (134,697
    )Fixed charges from continuing operationsInterest expense and
amortization of debt discount
and issuance costs on all
indebtedness
    
    
    6,414
    
    
    
    7,082
    
    
    
    7,693
    
    
    
    10,677
    
    
    
    13,339Interest included in rent
    
    
    5,159
    
    
    
    3,616
    
    
    
    3,578
    
    
    
    3,722
    
    
    
    7,579Total fixed charges from continuing
operations
    
    
    11,573
    
    
    
    10,698
    
    
    
    11,271
    
    
    
    14,399
    
    
    
    20,917Earnings (loss) before taxes and fixed
charges
    
    $
    156,488
    
    
    $
    109,050
    
    
    $
    66,469
    
    
    $
    (5,225
    )
    
    $
    (113,780
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
    
    
    13.5x
    
    
    
    10.2x
    
    
    
    5.9x
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Coverage deficiency (2)
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    19,624
    
    
    $
    134,697
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed by dividing earnings (loss) from
continuing operations before taxes by fixed charges from continuing operations for the
periods indicated. Fixed charges from continuing operations include (i) interest expense
and amortization of debt discount and issuance costs on all indebtedness, and (ii)
one-third of all rental expense, which the Company considers to be a reasonable
approximation of the interest factor included in rental expense.(2)
    
    Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges. For the years ended October 30, 2004
and October 25, 2003, the Company needed additional earnings of $19.6 million and $134.7
million, respectively, to achieve a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.0x.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6936

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTONIO DEMETRIUS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Little Wayne, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Antonio Williams , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg

. Michael F. Urbanski , Chief District Judge. ( 5:12

- cr - 00014

- MFU

- RSB

- 3; 5:15

- cv - 80827

- MFU

- RSB )

Submitted : December 21 , 2017 Decided: December 27, 2017

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Antonio Demetrius Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Demetrius Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

c onstitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional cl aims is debatable or
wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedur al ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S.
at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingl y, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISS ED
#### George D. Townsend, as Administrator, etc., of Sarah M. Burt Townsend, Deceased, and Others, Appellants, v. William E. Crowner and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs.

All concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 4141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 23, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(515) 564-6638.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Tuesday, February 23, 2010, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via 
telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan 
Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-
1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 
5115, Des Moines, IA 50309 or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 15, 2010.
Linda Rivera,
Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-1134 Filed 1-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
772 P.2d 1226

#### John MADSEN, SSA [ XXX-XX-XXXX ] Claimant-Appellant, v. IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Employer-Respondent, and State of Idaho, Department of Employment, Respondent.

No. 17191.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

April 11, 1989.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1989.

*1133John Madsen, Boise, appellant pro se.

Jim Jones, Idaho Atty. Gen. and Evelyn Thomas, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for respondents.

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an Industrial Commission decision denying Madsen unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

Claimant Madsen sought unemployment benefits for a twelve-month period commencing June 30, 1985, thereby extending benefits that he had previously received. That claim was denied by the Department of Employment, affirmed by the Industrial Commission, and upon appeal to this Court the decision of the Industrial Commission was affirmed. *See Madsen v. Department of Transportation and Department of Employment,*112 Idaho 104, 730 P.2d 1024 (1986). In that proceeding claimant asserted that he had received a check in the amount of $610.50 from a family-held corporation “for services rendered from ‘1985-1990.’ ”

Two months after this Court’s decision affirming a denial of unemployment benefits, Madsen again filed a claim for unemployment benefits for the same period of time covered in the previous proceedings, asserting the same ploy, *i.e.,*the receipt of a check for “wages” from the same family-held corporation. That claim was denied by the Department of Employment and affirmed on appeal by the Industrial Commission.

We hold that the prior decisions of the Department of Employment and the Industrial Commission as affirmed by this Court in *Madsen v. Department of Transportation,*112 Idaho 104, 730 P.2d 1024 (1986), are res judicata as to the claim for unemployment benefits.

The decision of the Industrial Commission in the instant cause is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

BAKES, BISTLINE, HUNTLEY and JOHNSON, JJ. concur.
# Hiram Johnson: A Featured Biography

**

----

Although Hiram Johnson loathed being referred to as an isolationist, it has become his chief legacy. Johnson represented California in the Senate for 28 years, through two world wars, from1917 to 1945. Known as one of the “irreconcilables” during the post-World War I debate on the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations, Johnson followed Woodrow Wilson’s pro-treaty speaking tour with impassioned rebuttals. In the 1930s, he blocked U.S. membership in the World Court. In 1940, he opposed Franklin Roosevelt’s peace-time draft. Before the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941, he opposed Roosevelt’s lend-lease plan, though he voted for the war after Pearl Harbor. Beyond foreign policy, he is perhaps best known for his support of the Hoover Dam’s creation. 

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Hiram Johnson