alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2149 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2149

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain other single 
                         yarn of viscose rayon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

 Mr. Hollings (for himself and Mr. Thurmond) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain other single 
                         yarn of viscose rayon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
    

``             9902.xx.xx     Other yarn,        Free        No change        No change       On or before
                               single: Of                                                      12/31/2004
                               viscose rayon,
                               untwisted or
                               with a twist not
                               exceeding 120
                               turns/m-
                               Multifilament,
                               with twist of
                               less than 5
                               turns or more
                               per meter
                               (provided for in
                               subheading
                               5403.31.00.40)..
 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to goods entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 
15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                               <all>D23/
```
Exhibit 10.5


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE


TO THE


L3HARRIS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN





WHEREAS, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ L3Harris ”), heretofore has adopted and maintains the L3Harris Retirement Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2024 (the " Plan ");





WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.1 of the Plan, the Employee Benefits Committee of L3Harris (the “ Committee ”) has the authority to amend the Plan;





WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.3 of the Plan, the Committee has delegated certain of such amendment authority to the head of global benefits of L3Harris (currently, the Senior Director, Global Benefits, Global Total Rewards) (the “ Head of Global Benefits ”);





WHEREAS, L3Harris has entered into a Sale Agreement with Fisica, Inc. (“ Purchaser ”) dated as of April 4, 2024 pursuant to which L3Harris and its subsidiary will sell to Purchaser L3Harris’ Electromagnetic/Radio Frequency division (such agreement, as it may be amended from time to time, the “ Sale Agreement ”);





WHEREAS, as a result of such sale all “Continuing Employees” (for all purposes of this Amendment, as such term is defined in the Sale Agreement) will cease to participate in the Plan;





WHEREAS, the Sale Agreement provides that effective as of the “Closing Date” (for all purposes of this Amendment, as such term is defined in the Sale Agreement), each Continuing Employee shall become fully vested in his or her account balance in the Plan; and





WHEREAS, the Head of Global Benefits desires to amend the Plan to reflect the above-described term of the Sale Agreement.





NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Schedule B of the Plan, Special Rules Applying to Divestiture Accounts and Divestiture Participants, is hereby amended, contingent upon the occurrence of the “Closing” (as such term is defined in the Sale Agreement) and effective as of the Closing Date, to add a new paragraph at the end thereof as follows:





[17.] Divestiture of Electromagnetic/Radio Frequency Business





(a) In General .  The Company has entered into a Sale Agreement with Fisica, Inc. dated as of April 4, 2024 pursuant to which the Company and its subsidiary will sell the Company’s Electromagnetic/Radio Frequency division (such agreement, as it may be amended from time to time, the “Electromagnetic/Radio Frequency Sale Agreement”).


(b) Vesting .  Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan, effective as of the “Closing Date” (as such term is defined in the Electromagnetic/Radio Frequency Sale Agreement), the “Continuing Employees” (as such term is defined in the





---

Exhibit 10.5


Electromagnetic/Radio Frequency Sale Agreement) shall be 100% vested in their Accounts under the Plan.


APPROVED by the HEAD OF GLOBAL BENEFITS on this 14 day of May, 2024.








Allison Oncel


Senior Director, Global Benefits, Global Total Rewards



















































































SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE


TO L3HARRIS RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Franklin Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
H. Siemers, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Thomas H. Siemers
--------------------------------------
Thomas H. Siemers
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Franklin Corporation and will be retained by First Franklin
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2264

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish within the Veterans

Health Administration the position of Advisor on Physician Assistants,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 21, 2000

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mrs. HUTCHISON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish within

the Veterans Health Administration the position of Advisor on Physician Assistants, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recognition of Physi5 cian Assistants in the Department of Veterans Affairs Act

6 of 2000’’.
2

•S 2264 IS

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION OF ADVISOR ON

2 PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS WITHIN OFFICE OF

3 UNDERSECRETARY FOR HEALTH.

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Subsection (a) of section

5 7306 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating paragraph (9) as para7 graph (10); and

8 (2) by inserting after paragraph (8) the fol9 lowing new paragraph (9):

10 ‘‘(9) The Advisor on Physician Assistants, who

11 shall carry out the responsibilities set forth in sub12 section (f).’’.

13 (b) RESPONSIBILITIES.—That section is further

14 amended—

15 (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub16 section (g); and

17 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol18 lowing new subsection (f):

19 ‘‘(f) The Advisor on Physician Assistants under sub20 section (a)(9) shall—

21 ‘‘(1) advise the Under Secretary for Health on

22 matters regarding the optimal utilization of physi23 cian assistants by the Veterans Health Administra24 tion;

25 ‘‘(2) advise the Under Secretary for Health on

26 the feasibility and desirability of establishing clinical
3

•S 2264 IS

1 privileges and practice areas for physician assistants

2 in the Administration;

3 ‘‘(3) develop initiatives to facilitate the utiliza4 tion of the full range of clinical capabilities of the

5 physician assistants employed by the Administration;

6 ‘‘(4) provide advice on policies affecting the em7 ployment of physician assistants by the Administra8 tion, including policies on educational requirements,

9 national certification, recruitment and retention,

10 staff development, and the availability of educational

11 assistance (including scholarship, tuition reimburse12 ment, and loan repayment assistance); and

13 ‘‘(5) carry out such other responsibilities as the

14 Under Secretary for Health shall specify.’’.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT SUSTRIK; SHARON BARNUM, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 

LLC, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-15791 

D.C. No. 

2:16-cv-02866-RFB-NJK 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 13, 2020

San Francisco, California

Before: IKUTA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and TAGLE,** District Judge.

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) imposes requirements on credit 

reporting agencies, and provides a private cause of action for willful or negligent 

violations of those requirements. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681n, 1681o. Two FCRA 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Hilda G. Tagle, United States District Judge for the 

Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUL 22 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

provisions, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(3)(B), (a)(6)(A), require a consumer be notified of 

the outcome of a reinvestigation triggered by the consumer’s dispute about 

information in a credit report. 

In this action, Robert Sustrik and Sharon Barnum allege that Equifax 

Information Services, LLC, violated the FCRA by failing to provide notice of the 

results of reinvestigations of items on their credit reports. Equifax had reinvestigated 

each disputed item and found no inaccuracies. Plaintiffs did not challenge the 

outcome of the reinvestigations, but only Equifax’s failure to provide notice of the 

results. The district court granted summary judgment to Equifax, finding Plaintiffs 

had failed to “satisfy the prima facie element of inaccuracy as required by the Ninth 

Circuit for the FCRA claims arising under Section 1681i.” We have jurisdiction 

over Plaintiffs’ appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

Although the text of the FCRA does not condition the duty to reinvestigate on 

inaccuracy in a credit report, we held in Dennis v. BEH–1, LLC that “section 1681i 

creates no duty to reinvestigate where ‘the credit report accurately reflect[s] the 

status of the information contained in the public records.’” 520 F.3d 1066, 1069 (9th 

Cir. 2008) (alteration in original) (quoting Williams v. Colonial Bank, 826 F. Supp. 

415, 418 (M.D. Ala. 1993)). We subsequently confirmed that “the FCRA’s 

reinvestigation provision, 15 U.S.C. § 1681i, . . . require[s] that an actual inaccuracy 

exist for a plaintiff to state a claim.” Carvalho v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, 629 F.3d 
3 

876, 890 (9th Cir. 2010). Under our precedent, the district court therefore did not 

err in holding that this suit failed because there was no genuine dispute that the 

information in the Plaintiffs’ files was accurate. 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Rancon Realty Fund IV (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel L. Stephenson, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that I perform the functions of chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Partnership, and that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by
the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission



|                      |  |  |  |                                    |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel Stephenson              |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Daniel Stephenson, General Partner |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Rancon Realty Fund IV              |  |
Exhibit 32.01

                       FNB FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned  officers of FNB Financial Services
Corporation  (the "Company")  certify that the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of
the  Company  for the  period  ended  March 31,  2005  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) or  15(d),  as  applicable,  of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934  and  information  contained  in  that  Form  10-Q  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: May 9, 2005                      /s/ ERNEST J. SEWELL
                                        -------------------------
                                         Ernest J. Sewell
                                         Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 9, 2005                      /s/ MICHAEL W. SHELTON
                                        -------------------------
                                         Michael W. Shelton
                                         Chief Financial Officer

*This certificate is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.


                                       23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>

THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0000743239
<NAME>                    GLEASON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>              1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           20437
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    57937
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      31037
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                120719
<PP&E>                                          169451
<DEPRECIATION>                                  110613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  197368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            59640
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5797
<OTHER-SE>                                       85763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    197368
<SALES>                                         122719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                122719
<CGS>                                            83699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    83699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 22431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (121)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  16710
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5939
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              10771
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     10771
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.07
        

</TABLE>
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 04-1167

DONALD C. HUTCHINS,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Selya, Circuit Judge,

Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

Donald C. Hutchins on brief pro se.

John M. Simon, with whom Kay H. Hodge and Stoneman, Chandler

& Miller LLP were on brief, for appellee.

September 14, 2004
Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs

and record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons

stated by the district court. The appellant fails to show that

the negligence claim was not properly dismissed on the ground

of arbitral immunity. New England Cleaning Servs., Inc. v.

American Arbitration Ass'n, 199 F.3d 542 (1st Cir. 1999).

Affirmed. 

1

st Cir. Rule 27(c).

-2-
-3-
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2355

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to modify

authorizations of appropriations for programs under such Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 4, 2000

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

to modify authorizations of appropriations for programs

under such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Growing Resources in

5 Educational Achievement for Today and Tomorrow Act’’

6 or the ‘‘GREATT IDEA Act’’.

7 SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

8 It is the purpose of this Act to more than double the

9 Federal funding authorized for programs and services
2

•S 2355 IS

1 under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20

2 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.).

3 SEC. 3. AMENDMENTS TO THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABIL4 ITIES EDUCATION ACT.

5 (a) ASSISTANCE FOR EDUCATION OF ALL CHILDREN

6 WITH DISABILITIES.—Section 611(j) of the Individuals

7 with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1411(j)) is

8 amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(j) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For the

10 purpose of carrying out this part, other than section 619,

11 there are authorized to be appropriated—

12 ‘‘(1) $6,230,469,900 for fiscal year 2001;

13 ‘‘(2) $7,779,800,800 for fiscal year 2002;

14 ‘‘(3) $9,714,403,800 for fiscal year 2003;

15 ‘‘(4) $12,130,084,000 for fiscal year 2004; and

16 ‘‘(5) $15,146,471,000 for fiscal year 2005.’’.

17 (b) GENERAL PROVISIONS.—Part A of the Individ18 uals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401 et

19 seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

20 ‘‘SEC. 608. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT.

21 ‘‘A State utilizing the proceeds of a grant received

22 under this Act, shall maintain expenditures for activities

23 carried out under this Act for each of fiscal years 2001

24 through 2005 at least at a level equal to not less than
3

•S 2355 IS

1 the level of such expenditures maintained by such State

2 for fiscal year 2000.’’.

Æ
# Joseph L. Bristow: A Featured Biography

**

----

Kansas senator Joseph L. Bristow is best known for introducing the resolution that led to the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution. Ratified in 1913, the Seventeenth Amendment removed the power given to the state legislatures to elect senators and provided for direct popular election.  As a Kansas newspaper editor in the 1890s, Bristow became active in Republican Party politics, serving as secretary of the state’s Republican committee. Prior to his election to the Senate in 1908, he was among the state’s progressive Republicans who supported the adoption of a statewide senatorial primary, a popular vote that would determine the state legislature’s choice for United States senators. Kansas adopted the primary system in 1908, and Bristow became the first Kansas senator elected in this manner. Upon entering the Senate, Bristow allied himself with a group of “insurgents” who favored expanding popular government, including amending the Constitution to provide for the direct election of senators. “We must place more responsibility on the average citizen,” Bristow argued. 

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
Exhibit 15



Letter Regarding Unaudited

Interim Financial Information



Alfa Corporation

Montgomery, Alabama



Ladies and Gentlemen:



|    |  |                                                                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Registration Statement No. 33-83134 on Form S-3 and 33-77916 and 33-76460 on Form S-8



With respect to the subject
registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 8, 2005, related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), our report dated November 8, 2005 related to our review of interim
financial information is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Act.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Birmingham, Alabama

November 8, 2005