alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MURRAY
INCOME PROPERTIES I, LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE BALANCE SHEET AND
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,367,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  833,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,283
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,192,880
<PP&E>                                      26,526,449
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,142,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,829,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,021,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,829,385
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               849,991
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  412,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                299,465
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            299,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   299,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.40
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBERTO WINFFEL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

A. POMAZAL; RONALD E. BARNES,

Warden,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-15202

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01709-MCEGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 16, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Alberto Winffel appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his safety in connection with a fall he sustained in a prison shower. 

FILED

APR 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-15202

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v.

Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Winffel

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants knew of

and disregarded an excessive risk to his safety. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S.

825, 837 (1994) (“[A] prison official cannot be found liable under the Eighth

Amendment for denying an inmate humane conditions of confinement unless the

official knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health or safety; the

official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a

substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.”);

Starr v. Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1207-08 (9th Cir. 2011) (discussing the requirements

for establishing supervisory liability).

AFFIRMED.
Order entered February 18, 2022 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00600-CV 

IN RE DAVID REISS AND SPY GAMES, LLC, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-02498 

ORDER 

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for 

writ of mandamus. We also GRANT relators’ motion to strike, and we 

accordingly STRIKE real party in interest’s February 7, 2022 sur-reply. 

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK 

 JUSTICE
# 2008 Schedule

**

----

**110th Congress, 2nd Session**

The *tentative* schedule for 2008 has been announced. The list below identifies non-legislative periods (days that the Senate *will not* be in session).         The schedule is also available in a calendar format (pdf image). The *tentative*  schedule for 2009  has been announced.        

**Jan 22**

Tentative reconvene

**Jan 28**

State of the Union

**Feb 16-24**

					State Work Period

**Mar 15-30**

				State Work Period, Easter				

**May 24-Jun 1**

 

					State Work Period				

Memorial Day

**Jun 28-Jul 6**

 

					State Work Period				

Independence Day

**Aug 9-Sep 7**

					State Work Period				

    Aug 25-28  

Democratic convention

    Sep 1-4

Republican convention

**TBD**

Target Adjournment Date

        The 2007 tentative legislative schedule is still available.     

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Executive Calendar 

The Senate Executive Calendar identifies executive resolutions, treaties, and nominations awaiting floor acton.  

### Congressional Schedules 

Schedules, which differ from calendars, indicate what the House and Senate intend to discuss on a particular day.

### Days in Session 

These calendars (Congress.gov)  list the days the Senate met for each session of Congress.

Visit the "Sessions of Congress"  web page to find out more about this topic.

### History of Meeting Places 

The Senate and House of Representatives first met in New York City's Federal Hall in March 1789.  Since that time, they have occupied numerous meeting places and quarters.

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-45349, 333-52489,333-40912, 333-48778, 333-76356 and 333-97821), in the Registration Statements on Form S-4 (Nos. 333-52232 and 333-63252) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43059, 333-45351, 333-86681, 333-93419, 333-46816, 333-57778,333-59820, 333-61952, 333-72544, 333-73574, 333-76312, 333-89168, 333-108049, 333-112025, 333-116095 and 333-126819) of Polycom, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statementschedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

February 24, 2009
# William Maclay: A Featured Biography

**

----

William Maclay (1737-1804) received a nearly unanimous vote of the Pennsylvania state legislature on September 30, 1788, and joined fellow Pennsylvanian Robert Morris to become one of the first two United States senators. Prior to his election to the Senate, Maclay served in the French and Indian Wars and later joined the militia to fight for American independence. After learning the trade of surveying and studying law, he served in the Pennsylvania state legislature. Today, Maclay is remembered for his defense of democratic principles and his sarcastic, critical wit—quite evident in The Journal of William Maclay (LOC).

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
#### Charles P. Motman v. Guffey Petroleum Company.

Application granted. Order signed.
# Roscoe Conkling: A Featured Biography

**

----

An enormously confident and powerful political boss, Roscoe Conkling (1829–1888) fought a monumental patronage battle with President James Garfield that ended tragically for both men. As a Republican senator from New York, Conkling supported Garfield's election as president in 1880, expecting to be repaid with appointments for his supporters. Instead, Garfield appointed a reformer to the patronage-rich post of collector of the Port of New York. Conkling resigned from the Senate in protest and returned to New York, convinced that his reelection by the state legislature would be a rebuke to the president. Then a deranged patronage seeker assassinated President Garfield. The New York state legislature defeated Conkling's bid for reelection, ending his political career. These shocking events inspired passage of the Civil Service Act to end the abuses of the patronage system.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Roscoe Conkling
# Senators Born Outside the United States

**

----

The president is constitutionally required to be natural born, but foreign–born senators need only nine years of U.S. citizenship to qualify for office.      Constitutional qualifications to be a senator are specified in      Article I, section 3.           

**Key:**

* Born to American parents abroad     † Born in territories not yet incorporated into the U.S.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
No. 1,875.

#### STATE ex rel. GILCHRIST, Relator, *v.*WESTON, Defendant.

Original — Inj unction.

(Eor former opinion, see 27 Mont. 197, 70 Pac. 1134.)

On motion to tax costs.

Decided January 31, 1903.

*559
      *Mr. B. Lee Word, Mr. G. F. Kelly,*and *Mr. W. M. Bickford,*for Relator.

*Mr. J. J. Mediation, Mr. L. P. Forestall,*and *Mr. Guy Sta-pleton,*for Defendant.

Per Curiam.

— Relator’s motion to tax the costs herein, heretofore submitted to the court, is sustained, and the cost bill of defendant is disallowed.

(Me. Justice Holloway, having taken n'oi pait in the consideration of this cause, takes no part in this decision.)
UNITED STATES
		      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
			     WASHINGTON DC 20549

				FORM 10-QSB

	       QUARTERLY REPORT PUSRUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) THE
			  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  For the Quarter Ending September 30,2001  Commission File Number 21-16563-B

                              REII INCORPORATED
                       (Formerly Bap Acquisition Corp.)
	     -----------------------------------------------------
	    ( Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

           DELAWARE                                       51-0373876
    -----------------------------                     ---------------------
   (State or other Jurisdiction of                    (IRS Employee Number)
   (Incorporation Or Organization)

	      1051 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, NAPLES, FLORIDA        34102
	     ------------------------------------------    ----------
	       (Address of Principal Executive Offices)    (Zip Code)

			      (941) 261-3396
		      ------------------------------
		      (Regiatrant's Telephone Number
			    Including Area Code)


   Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
   required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
   Act of 1934 during the preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period
   that the registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been
   subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

		  Yes  [X]                             No_____


   As of September 30, 2001 4,655,310 shares of common stock, $.001 par were
   outstanding.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apex Resources Group,
Inc.,on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, John R. Rask, Principal Executive Officer and John M. Hickey,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.



Date: February 18, 2005          By: /s/ John Ray Rask
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    John Ray Rask, Principal Executive Officer



Date: February 18, 2005          By: /s/ John M. Hickey
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    John M. Hickey, Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Beverly National Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), we, Donat A. Fournier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael O. Gilles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Donat A. Fournier  
|    |  | Donat A. Fournier      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    | 
|    |  | August 10, 2006        
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Michael O. Gilles  
|    |  | Michael O. Gilles      
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    | 
|    |  | August 10, 2006        

The foregoing certificate is furnished solely for purposes of complying with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any of the Companys previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the Companys future filings, including this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         111,670
<SECURITIES>                                   238,746
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    117,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               654,448
<PP&E>                                       3,000,460
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,391,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,736,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          203,621
<BONDS>                                        758,604
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,894
<PREFERRED>                                     25,465
<COMMON>                                        44,226
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,042,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,736,797
<SALES>                                        348,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,507
<CGS>                                          280,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  323,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,029)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,666)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (617)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
#### THE MINNESOTA AND MONTANA LAND AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, Appellant, *v.*BRASIER, Respondent.

[Submitted July 6, 1896.

Decided July 13, 1896.]

*Ejectment*— Adverse *possession*— Statute *of limitations*— Paper *title.*— Adverse possession of lands for the period of the statute of limitations will not be defeated because defendant’s entry was not made under a paper title. *(National Mining Go.*y. *Powers,*3 Mont. 314, cited.)

*Appeal from Seventh Judicial District, Yellowstone County.*

Ejectment. Judgment was rendered for the defendant below by Milburn, J.

Affirmed.

*445
      *O. R. Middleton*and *O. F.*Goddard, for Appellant.

*James R.*Goss, for Respondent.

Pee Curiam.

This is an action of ejectment which was decided by the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The court rendered judgment for defendant on the ground that plaintiff’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. The agreed statement of facts set forth that the defendant entered upon the land September 1, 1882, under a claim of title, claiming that it was exclusive of any other right, but not founded upon a written instrument, judgment, or decree, and that defendant had been in quiet, peaceable, open, notorious, actual, exclusive and continued occupation of said lands, and that same have been protected by a substantial inclosure by defendant of the premises in question, and that the same have been usually cultivated and improved by said defendant, Brasier, ever since that time until the commencement of this action, and that he has held the same adversely to the plaintiff and to all other parties since the said 1st day of September, 1882. The action was commenced in 1893.

Sufficient time to constitute the period of the statute of limitations had therefore run since September 1, 1882. The statutes of limitation in regard to real estate were, at the time this action was commenced, §§ 29, 30, Code Civil Procedure 1887. The statutes providing what should be deemed to be adverse possessions were §§ 35 and 36 of the same Code. We will not quote them at this time. The only contention of plaintiff against the defense of the statute of limitations was that the defendant’s entry was not made under a paper title. But this contention is decided adversely to plaintiff in *Mining Co.*v. Powers, 3 Mont. 344. The question is there thoroughly discussed, and the authority of that case has never been questioned. See, also, *Lamme*v. Dodson, 4 Mont. 591, 2 Pac. 298. We shall therefore go no further than to cite the authority, and affirm the judgment of the district court.

*Affirmed.*
No. 1,806.

#### BORDEAUX, Respondent, *v.*BORDEAUX, Appellant.

*Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow Bounty; William Glancy, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided January 9, 1903.

*Messrs. McHatton & Goiter, Mr. J. B. Root,*and *Mr. William A. Clark, Jr.,*for Appellant.-

*Messrs. Stapleton & Stapleton,*and *Mr. B. S, Thresher,*for Respondent.

(Eor former opinion, see 26 Mont. 539, 69 Pac. 1130.)

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is hereby sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-34205) pertaining to the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan and the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of SteriGenics International, Inc. of our report
dated May 1, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
SteriGenics International, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended March 31, 1998.
 
     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of SteriGenics
International, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
June 25, 1998