alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Compensation to Non-Employee Directors


 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Compensation to Non-Employee Directors 
 On June 12, 2009, the Board of Directors
(the “Board”) of Cheniere Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee to compensate each non-employee director of the Company $160,000 for services for the period from
the current year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders (June 12, 2009) until the next year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Period”). Additional compensation of $20,000 for the Annual Period was approved for the chairman
of the Audit Committee, the chairman of the Compensation Committee and the Lead Director. Additional compensation of $10,000 for the Annual Period was approved for the chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee. Compensation will be paid,
at the election of the director, either 100% in shares of restricted stock of the Company or 50% in cash and 50% in shares of restricted stock of the Company. If a director elects to receive 50% of his or her compensation in cash, such cash payments
will be made quarterly as of the 15th day of August, November, February and May, beginning on August 15, 2009. Payment in the form of restricted stock will be made on June 15, 2009 (the “Date of Grant”), and the number
of shares granted will be determined by the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the NYSE Amex on the Date of Grant. Vesting of the restricted stock will occur in full on the first anniversary of the Date of Grant.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Franjessica Williams, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00224

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 282nd District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F

1400534

- S ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Franjessica Williams, has adequately indicated h er inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 6, 2015 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF H.T.E., INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         17,413
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                   417
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               37,217
<PP&E>                                         3,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 43,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,784
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       73
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   43,312
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24,820
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                   803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .21



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1909-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1909-DR), dated May 4, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 5, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 4, 2010.

McNairy, Perry, Shelby, and Tipton Counties for Individual Assistance.

McNairy, Perry, Shelby, and Tipton Counties for debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A and B), including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-11504 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# Guy Gillette: A Featured Biography

**

----

A former staff member of Senator Guy Gillette (1879-1973), Stewart McClure, once described the Iowa senator as "one of the best looking men who ever served in this body." Allen Drury, in his *A Senate Journal*, described Gillette as "a nice fellow ... impressively handsome with a friendly twinkle in his eye." Today, Gillette is remembered as much for his dignified appearance as for his independent spirit. As a Democratic member of Congress, he supported most of President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal legislation, but outwardly opposed the president's plan to reorganize the Supreme Court. A staunch isolationist at the onset of the Second World War, Gillette ultimately developed strong internationalist tendencies and was actively involved in the creation of the United Nations charter. Among his principal interests in the Senate were foreign relations and agriculture. 

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 20, 2021

p0113

Order 

Clerk

January 20, 2021

161267

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161267

COA: 351480

Oakland CC: 2002-186168-FC

JEFFREY ALLEN NYE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of October 2, 2020, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals. On 

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is 

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to address: (1) whether the Oakland 

Circuit Court had statutory authority under MCL 769.1k to issue the September 23, 2015 

amended order to remit prisoner funds; and (2) if so, whether setting the amount of 

attorney fees several years after sentencing violates due process. People v Jackson, 483 

Mich 271, 292 (2009). 

On remand, while retaining jurisdiction, the Court of Appeals shall remand this 

case to the Oakland Circuit Court and direct that court to appoint counsel to represent the 

defendant in the Court of Appeals. We direct the Court of Appeals’ attention to the fact 

that we have also remanded People v Terry (Docket No. 161983) to the Court of Appeals 

for consideration of similar issues.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
### The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3634

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Roy Edward Duckett, * Eastern District of Arkansas. aka Leroy Edward Duckett, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 1, 1997 Filed: April 7, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

Le roy Edward Duckett appeals the district court's denial of hi s 1 motion t o dismiss for a violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, and from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possessin g a forged security, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513(a). We conclude that Duckett waived his speedy-trial claim, and affirm his sentence.
After the district court rescheduled the joint trial of Duckett and his co-defendant for April 22, 1996, Duckett moved to

### -2-

dismiss, arguing that he had suffered a violation under the Speedy Trial Act. The district court denied the motion, and Duckett later pleade d guilty
. There is no indication in the record before us that Ducket t entered into a conditional guilty plea, preservi ng his right to appeal the speedy-trial issue. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)( 2). We therefore conclude that Duckett waived his right to appeal the issue. See Unites States v. Vaugh an , 13 F.3d 1186, 1187-88 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 511 U.S. 109 4 (1994); U nited States v. Cox , 985 F.2d 427, 433 (8th Cir. 1993); Unite d States v. Gines , 964 F.2d 972, 977 (10th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 506 U.S . 1069 (1993). Duckett also challenges the district court's refusal to grant him an acce ptance-of-responsibilityreduction. We conclude that the distric t court did not clearly err in denying the adjustm ent. See United States v. Campos , 87 F.3d 261, 264 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied , 11 7 S. Ct. 539 (1996). Although Duckett pleaded guilty to the instant offense , he subsequently engag ed in additional criminal conduct--misrepresenting a social security numbe r. See United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1, comment. (n.3) (1995); United States v. Byrd , 76 F.3d 194, 196-97 (8th Cir. 1996); United States v. Poplawski , 46 F.3d 42, 43 (8th Cir.) , cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 2261 (1995). Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 11

                      HEALTH CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.


                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

The Company's Statement of Operations prepared by Management and audited by W.
Dale McGhie for the years ending December 31, 1996, and 1995, include
computation of earnings per share determined my using the monthly weighted
average of shares outstanding during these periods. The weighted average shares
used in the loss per common share calculations were 410,371,000 for December 31,
1996, 203,792,000 for December 31, 1995, and 89,608,000 for December 31, 1994.
Stock options are not included in the calculation since they are anti-dilutive.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND C. FOSS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
TODD ROWEN,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 17

- 15652

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 00686

- TLN

- DB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Raymond C. Foss appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing as time

- barred his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
false arrest and imprisonment

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo

. Jones v. Blanas , 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9t h Cir. 2004). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 15652

The district c ourt properly dismissed Foss’s action as time

- barred because
,

even with the benefit of statutory tolling and accepting Foss’s argument that his

claim accrued in October 2006
, Foss failed to file this action within the applicable

statute of limitations
, and equitable tolling did not apply. See Cal

. Code Civ. Proc.
§ 335.1 (two

- year statute of limitations for personal injury claims); Jones , 393 F.3d

at 927 (§ 1983 claims are governed by the forum state’s statute of l imitations for
personal injury claims , including state law regarding tolling ); Azer v. Connell , 306
F.3d 930, 936 (9th Cir. 2002) ( three

- pronged test for equitable tolling in

California )

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by not holding an e videntiary
hearing. See United States v. Schafer , 625 F.3d 629, 635 (9th Cir. 2010) (denial of
evidentiary hearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion).
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Foss’s motion for
appointment of counsel because Foss did not show exceptional circumstances
warranting such an appointment. See Palmer v. Valdez , 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th
Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review and explaining the “exceptional
circumstances” requir ement).
We reject as unsupported by the record Foss’s contenti on that he was
prejudiced by defendant raising new issues in the reply br ief because Foss was3 17

- 15652

given an opportunity to file a sur

- reply brief.

AFFIRMED.
# Senators Who Have Died in Office

**

----

There have been 302 senators who have died while in office.

*The date of death followed the sine die adjournment of the Congress.

**Sources:** U.S., Congress, Senate, A Necrology of United States Senators (Washington, D.C., 1975); Senate Historical Office.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
# States in the Senate | Alabama

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Tommy Tuberville (R)***Hometown: Auburn*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Katie Boyd Britt (R)***Hometown: Montgomery*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Alabama became the 22nd state to join the Union on December 14, 1819. The state’s first two senators, William R. King and John Walker, took office on that day. Alabama’s longest-serving senators include John Sparkman (1946–1979), Lister Hill (1938–1969), and Richard Shelby (1987–present). Among those who rose to leadership positions are William R. King and Benjamin Fitzpatrick, who served as the Senate’s president pro tempore, and Oscar Underwood, who became the Senate’s first designated Democratic leader in 1920. As vice president of the United States, William R. King was poised to serve as the Senate’s constitutional president or presiding officer. He died, however, before he could assume those duties.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MURRAY
INCOME PROPERTIES I, LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE BALANCE SHEET AND
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,826,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  426,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,806
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,236,453
<PP&E>                                      24,380,099
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,300,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,666,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,761
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,992,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,666,464
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,667,418
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,238
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,036,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,036,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,036,271
<EPS-BASIC>                                      35.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    35.98


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001009675
<NAME>                        Sawtek Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         144,343
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  31,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,000
<INVENTORY>                                    18,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,120
<PP&E>                                         96,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                 34,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,659
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21
<OTHER-SE>                                     243,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   259,488
<SALES>                                        159,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,841
<CGS>                                          64,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  64,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20,661
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                82,220
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            79,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   79,282
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.82


</TABLE>