alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11333]



[[Page 26921]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XW42


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (MAFMC) Joint 
Spiny Dogfish Committee and Advisory Panel will hold a meeting via 
webinar.

DATES: The webinar will be held on Thursday, June 3, 2010, from 9 a.m. 
to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The webinar will be held at the Mid-Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council, 800 N. State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; 
telephone: (302) 674-2331.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director, 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. State Street, Suite 
201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331, extension 255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting will be to review 
scoping comments and consider action alternatives for inclusion in 
Amendment 3 to the Spiny Dogfish FMP.
    Details concerning participation on the webinar will be posted on 
the Council's website at www.mafmc.org. Interested members of the 
public may observe via computer and/or phone access or may attend the 
meeting in person at the Mid-Atlantic Council offices located at 800 
North State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to M. Jan Saunders at the Mid-Atlantic Council 
Office, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: May 7, 2010.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-11333 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorpration by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-04351) pertaining to the NOVA Corporation 1991 Employees Stock
Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan and the NOVA Corporation 1996
Employees Stock Incentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-64683) pertaining to the NOVA Corporation 1996 Employees Stock Incentive
Plan and NOVA Corporation Directors Stock Option Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-64681) pertaining to the PMT Services, Inc. 1997
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and
1994 Incentive Stock Plan of our report dated February 22, 2000 with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of NOVA Corporation included
in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                        Ernst & Young LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2000
<PAGE>

                  THE PUBLISHING COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.
                         FORM 10-KSB - DECEMBER 31, 1998



                                    EXHIBITS


Exhibit 23.0      Consent of Ernst & Young LLP




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-27629) pertaining to The Publishing Company of North America, Inc.
1996 Stock Plan of our report dated March 3, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The Publishing Company of North America,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,
1998.


ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Orlando, Florida
March 26, 1999
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

178 

CA 13-01276 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

PATRICIA DEJOY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KEVIN M. EHMANN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

FINUCANE & HARTZELL, LLP, PITTSFORD (DANIEL O’BRIEN OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICES OF KAREN L. LAWRENCE, PITTSFORD (BARNEY BILELLO OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn

Frazee, J.), entered September 20, 2012. The order, among other

things, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion to

dismiss the complaint based upon plaintiff’s failure to file a summons

and complaint within the statute of limitations. Contrary to

plaintiff’s contention, we conclude that such nonfiling may not be

corrected or disregarded pursuant to CPLR 2001 (see Goldenberg v

Westchester County Health Care Corp., 16 NY3d 323, 328). The court

also properly denied plaintiff’s motion seeking permission to file the

summons and complaint nunc pro tunc (see generally Mandel v Waltco

Truck Equip. Co., 243 AD2d 542, 543-544, lv denied 91 NY2d 809),

inasmuch as granting such relief would effectively extend the statute

of limitations, a result proscribed by CPLR 201 (see Bradley v St.

Clare’s Hosp., 232 AD2d 814, 815; De Maria v Smith, 197 AD2d 114, 116-

117). 

Entered: February 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Marvin Brock, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00069

- CV v.

RJT Property & Management, LLC, Appellee Appeal from the 95th District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. DC

- 16

- 10872

- D ). Opinion de livered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Marvin Brock, has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
NO. 07-03-0309-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

AUGUST 8, 2003

______________________________

WARREN P. CANADY, APPELLANT

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 088254-00-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Warren P. Canady, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from the

trial court’s order dismissing his claim against the Texas Department of Criminal JusticeInstitutional Division for injuries he allegedly sustained. Canady timely filed his notice of

appeal on July 7, 2003. By letter dated July 9, this Court notified Canady that no further

action would be taken in this appeal until the $125 filing fee was received and that failure
1All references to rules are to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

to pay the fee might result in dismissal under Rule 42.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure.1

 In response, on July 25, 2003, he filed an application to proceed in forma

pauperis. For the reasons expressed herein, we dismiss the appeal.

Pursuant to Rule 20.1(a), a party may proceed without advance payment of costs

if the party files an affidavit of indigence in compliance with the Rules. Rule 20.1(c)

provides that an affidavit of indigence must be filed in the trial court with or before the

notice of appeal, and Rule 20.1(c)(3) further provides that the time in which to file the

affidavit may be extended if, within 15 days after the date the notice of appeal was filed,

the party files a motion for extension of time in compliance with Rule 10.5(b). (Emphasis

added).

Canady’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was not filed in the trial court with

or before the notice of appeal nor was it filed within the 15-day window with a motion for

extension of time. See Mikkilineni v. City of Houston, 4 S.W.3d 298, 299

(Tex.App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). Thus, it is ineffective to excuse him from

paying the filing fee. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          18,947
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,596)
<INVENTORY>                                     41,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,652
<PP&E>                                          72,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,066)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,179
<BONDS>                                        154,326
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,726
<SALES>                                        136,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,670
<CGS>                                           88,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,309
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,926
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,019)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,081
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3439247
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3439247
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7016]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picasso Looks at Degas''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Picasso Looks at Degas,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Sterling and 
Francine Clark Art Institute, from on or about June 6, 2010, until on 
or about September 12, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 12, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-11991 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 09-0592

IN RE  LARRY C. NAIL

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s emergency motion to stay, filed July 21, 2009, is granted in part and denied in part.  Relator’s request to stay the proceedings in Cause No. 2008-CI-08066 in the 225th District Court of Bexar County is denied.  All proceedings in Cause No. 04-08-00933-CV, styled *In re  Rick Godwin and Eagle’s Nest Christian Fellowship Church, Inc. n/k/a Summit Christian Center*, in the Fourth Court of Appeals are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this July 23, 2009.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Forms  S-3  (Nos.  333-129756,  333-36682,  333-43750,  333-64414,
333-72553, 333-74390, 333-103231, 333-120742 and 333-112356) and Forms S-8 (Nos.
333-35992,  333-56216 and 333-112935) of SIGA  Technologies,  Inc. of our report
dated March 28, 2006 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Greg D. Forrest, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Greg D. Forrest     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Greg  D. Forrest         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | March 1,  2010      |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT 9/30/95 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED 9/30/95 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,488,834
<SECURITIES>                                 1,032,657
<RECEIVABLES>                                  857,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,881
<INVENTORY>                                    772,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,128,384
<PP&E>                                       4,549,370
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,355,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,463,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,211,984
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         4,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,247,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,463,719
<SALES>                                      1,488,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,596,970
<CGS>                                        1,157,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,157,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of SIGA Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Eric A. Rose, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. /s/Eric A. Rose, M.DDr. Eric A. Rose, M.D.Chief Executive OfficerMarch 6, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-49622) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-39592, No. 333-42616, No.
333-47250, No. 333-84825 and No. 333-90795) of WebMD Corporation of our report
dated February 28, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of WebMD Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2001.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of WebMD Corporation
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                    /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 22, 2002
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00335-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v.

JUAN CARLOS LARA

On Appeal from the

93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-1122-15-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 27, 2018