alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jeptha Wharton and James W. Bell, plaintiffs in error *vs.*J. W. Jossey, defendant in error.

Where the plaintiff employed a servant who was indebted to one of the defendants in the sum of $24, in satisfaction of which he had previously contracted to split rails, and defendants removed said laborer and his wife from the control of plaintiff, defendants were not liable for damages to plaintiff until the expiration of a reasonable time for the performance of the contract as to the rails. (B.)

Master and servant. Before Judge Clark. Webster Superior Court. September Term, 1871.

All the facts necessary to a clear understanding of this case are set forth in the decision.

W. A. Hawkins; Hawkins & Guerry; Thomas H. Pickett, for plaintiffs in error.

No appearance for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff brought his action against the defendants for persuading, enticing and decoying .off’ from his employment, on his plantation, two servants, to-wit: Isaac Brown and his wife Emily. On the trial of the case the jury found a ver*579diet for the plaintiff for the sum of $191. The defendants made a motion for a new trial on the several grounds set forth in the record, which was overruled and the defendants excepted. It appears, from the evidence in the record, that on the 4th day of January, 1871, the plaintiff made a contract with Brown, and employed him as a laborer to work on his plantation for that year, and moved him and his wife there the next day thereafter; did not know that Brown had been employed by Wharton. On the 7th January the defendants removed Brown and his wife from plaintiff’s plantation to Sampson Bell’s. It also appears, from the evidence, that Brown, at the time he hired himself to the plaintiff, was living with Wharton, one of the defendants, and had been living with him the previous year, and was indebted to him the sum of $24; that Brown had contracted with Wharton to split rails for him to pay the debt. This contract of Brown with Wharton had not been complied with when the defendants removed Brown and his wife from the plaintiff’s plantation. This suit was commenced on the 21st February, 1871. In our judgment, the plaintiff had no cause of action against the defendants until the expiration of the time for which Wharton had employed the servant to split the rails in payment of his debt, in the exercise of ordinary labor and diligence for that purpose. Until the servant had completed his prior contract with Wharton, the plaintiff had no claim to his services under his contract. So far as it is shown by the record, at the time the suit was commenced, Brown, the servant, was in the legal employment of Wharton. The plaintiff’s right to his services under his contract did not accrue until after the expiration-of the servant’s contract with Wharton. If the defendants had detained the servant for an unreasonable time, under the pretext of performing his contract with them, or either of them, and thereby deprived the plaintiff of his services under his contract, with knowledge of the same, then the plaintiff would have had a cause of action against them.

Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                470
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      470
<PP&E>                                          270467910
<DEPRECIATION>                                      19433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  270448947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              480177
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        200000
<COMMON>                                              885
<OTHER-SE>                                      269767885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    270448947
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      667385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   266600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (989586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (989586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (48520200)
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (49509786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.159)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (1.159)



</TABLE>
Certificate of Trust of Torchmark Capital Trust V



 Exhibit 4.3 
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 TORCHMARK CAPITAL TRUST V 
 This Certificate of Trust is being duly executed and
filed by the undersigned, as trustees, for the purpose of forming a statutory trust pursuant to the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, 12 Del. C. §§ 3801 et seq. (the “Act”). 
 The undersigned hereby certify as follows: 
 1. Name. The name of the statutory trust is Torchmark Capital Trust V (the “Trust”). 
 2. Delaware Trustee.
The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the Act are as follows: 
 BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware 
 White Clay
Center, Route 273 
 Newark, Delaware 19711 
 3. Effective. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. 
 4. Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or more counterparts. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the Trust, have duly executed this
Certificate of Trust as of May 27, 2009. 
  

			
	 BNY MELLON TRUST OF DELAWARE,
 as Delaware
Trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kristine K. Gullo

	Name:	 	Kristine K. Gullo
	Title:	 	Vice President
	
	 /s/ Danny H. Almond

	Danny H. Almond, as Regular Trustee
	
	 /s/ Larry M. Hutchison

	Larry M. Hutchison, as Regular Trustee
	
	 /s/ Gary L. Coleman

	Gary L. Coleman, as Regular Trustee


  

 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             577
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,215
<PP&E>                                           5,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              996
<BONDS>                                          1,698
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         26
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,577
<SALES>                                          1,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,356
<CGS>                                              966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    35
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (31)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (45)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (45)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.02)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
AS OF APRIL 1, 1997, THE COMPANY CHANGED ITS FISCAL YEAR TO JANUARY 31.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           37293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    65450
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1770
<INVENTORY>                                     120658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                238390
<PP&E>                                           60936
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  311117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            72161
<BONDS>                                         109185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       47640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    311117
<SALES>                                         606334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                607169
<CGS>                                           525861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   592387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               12833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6720
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4788
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1932
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1932
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Fortress Group, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet of December 31, 1999 and The
Fortress Group, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended
December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1010607
<NAME>                        The Fortress Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         17,526
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    328,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         12,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 451,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       125
<OTHER-SE>                                     79,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   451,181
<SALES>                                        740,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               740,785
<CGS>                                          626,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  714,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,439)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                14,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,469
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,277
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .37



</TABLE>
#### W. A. McGhee, plaintiff in error, vs. Amos S. Way, defendant in error.

1. Where execution was levied upon land which had been set apart as a homestead, the plaintiff having made affidavit that the debt upon which the execution was founded was for the purchase-money, and the defendant filed a counter-affidavit to the effect “ that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, he paid the purchase-money for the land levied on,” a demurrer to said counter-affidavit was properly sustained. (R.)

2. The mere allegation in an affidavit of illegality that the judgment is for an amount considerably greater than the' verdict, without stating how large is the excess, is insufficient. (R.)

Homestead. Purchase-money. Counter-affidavit. Before Judge Harrell. Stewart Superior Court. April Term, 1872.

For the facts of the case, see the decision.

Beall & Tucker; H. Fielder, for plaintiff in error.

J. L. Wimberly; John T. Clark, for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff in the Court below levied an execution upon the property of the defendant, which had been set apart as a homestead, first making an affidavit, as required by the Act of 1871, that the debt on which the execution was founded *283was a debt due for the purchase-money of the land levied on. The defendant in execution filed two counter-affidavits, in one of which he stated that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, he had paid the purchase-money for the land levied on, and that he has other lands in his possession that has not been homesteaded. In the other, he stated that the judgment entered up against him is considerably greater than the verdict of the jury in the case on which the *ji.fa.*was founded. The plaintiff demurred to both affidavits, the demurrer was sustained by the Court, and the affidavits dismissed, whereupon the defendant excepted.

The counter-affidavit of the defendant does not deny *the truth*of the plaintiff’s affidavit, but states to the best of his knowledge and belief that he had paid the purchase-money for the land levied on, but when or to whom he does not state, nor whether before or after judgment. He does not state that he has paid the judgment rendered against him, on which the execution issued. The Act required him to deny the *truth*of the plaintiff’s affidavit in his counter-affidavit, so as to form an issue thereon tobe submitted to the jury.

"What number of acres of other lands, not covered by the homestead, are in his possession, is not stated, or whether the same is subject to the plaintiff’s execution. The other affidavit, that the execution is *considerably*greater than the verdict, is entirely too indefinite. He should have stated how much greater, so as to show to the Court the true amount that was actually due on the judgment. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to both affidavits.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Exhibit 11. COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



|                                     |  | Three Months Ended March 31,
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|                                     |  | 2003                        
|Net Income                           |  | $                           
|                                     |  |                             
|Average Shares Outstanding           |  |                             
|                                     |  |                             
|Basic Earnings Per Share             |  | $                           
|                                     |  |                             
|Net Income                           |  | $                           
|                                     |  |                             
|Average Shares Outstanding           |  |                             
|Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options |  |                             
|                                     |  |                             
|Adjusted Shares Outstanding          |  |                             
|                                     |  |                             
|Diluted Earnings Per Share           |  | $                           
|                                     |  |
463 A.2d 25

#### Commonwealth v. Hennessey, Appellant.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied Oct. 18, 1983.

Argued November 15, *6211982.

Stuart Wilder, for appellant; Stephen B. Harris, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before BROSKY, McEWEN and WATKINS, JJ.

The judgment of sentence of the learned Bucks County Common Pleas Court Judge John J. Bodley is affirmed.
CAUSE NO. 12-15-00039-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TAURUS JENKINS

, } APPEALED FROM 159TH DISTRICT COURT

APPELLANT

V. } IN AND FOR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, } ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

ORDER

THIS DAY came on to be heard the motion filed by Mr. Albert Charanza to permit

substitution of counsel for Appellant, and the same having been considered, it is hereby

ORDERED that this cause be remanded to the trial court for consideration and disposition of the

motion. (A copy is attached hereto)

It is FINALLY ORDERED that a supplemental clerk’s record containing the court’s any

appropriate order(s) attendant thereto and the reporter’s supplemental record of any hearing

conducted be certified to this Court on or before March 30, 2015

.

WITNESS the Honorable James T. Worthen, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals, 12 th Court

of Appeals District, Tyler, Texas.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at Tyler, Texas this 26th day of

February 2015

, A.D.

Respectfully yours,

Cathy S. Lusk, CLERK

By:

________________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW FILED AS PART OF
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,388,148
<SECURITIES>                                    60,847
<RECEIVABLES>                                  829,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,923,059
<PP&E>                                       8,276,421
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,849,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,724,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,428,879
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,035,767
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,395
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,224,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,724,808
<SALES>                                      3,045,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,045,899
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,793,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,444,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,444,646)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.33)


</TABLE>