alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 23, 2010.

      ( print page 4138)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee will be held Tuesday, February 23, 2010, at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

                        Dated: January 15, 2010                        *.*

Linda Rivera,

Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-1121 Filed 1-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




The Board of Directors of
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-83835) and on Form S-8 (333-72601, 333-72599,
333-09365, and 333-09375), of our report dated February 20, 2001, except as to
the matter discussed in the second paragraph of Note 10, as to which the date is
March 30, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedules, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, which
appears in this Form 10-K.






                                             PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




Jacksonville, Florida
March 30, 2001



<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 23




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




The Board of Directors
FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated March 8, 2000 relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. as of December 31, 1999
and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes
in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 1999 incorporated herein by reference in the
registration statements on Forms S-3 of FPIC Insurance Group, Inc. (333-83835)
and Form S-8 of FPIC Insurance Group, Inc.'s Director Stock Option Plan
(333-72601), and Omnibus Incentive Plan (333-72599), and Florida Physicians
Insurance Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan (333-09365) and Defined
Contribution Plan (333-09375).



                                                     KPMG LLP




Jacksonville, Florida
March 27, 2001
* Pursuant to 5 THC IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 THC IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40822 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LUIS JAVIER SUAREZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-307-1

-------------------- December 12, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Luis Javier Suarez-Garcia appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin. Suarez-Garcia argues that 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846, the statutes under which he was convicted and sentenced, were rendered facially unconstitutional by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000)
. SuarezGarcia concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our opinion inNo. 01-40822 -2- United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580, 581-82 (5th Cir. 2000)(revised opinion), cert. denied , 532 U.S. 1045 (2001), which rejected a broad Apprendi -based attack on the constitutionality of those statutes. He raises the issue only to preserve it for Supreme Court review. A panel of this court cannot overrule a prior panel’s decision in the absence of an intervening contrary or superseding decision by this court sitting en banc or by the United States Supreme Court. Burge v. Parish of St. Tammany , 187 F.3d 452, 466 (5th Cir. 1999). No such decision overruling Slaughter exists. Accordingly, Suarez-Garcia’s argument is indeed foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7015

MICHAEL P. WILLS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus A. D. ROBINSON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-549) Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 4, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael P. Wills, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael P. Wills, a Virginia prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 318 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Wills has not made the requisite showing. See Wills v. Robinson , No. CA-02-549 (E.D. Va. filed June 14, 2002; entered June 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) VSE Corporation ) ) Under Contract No. W56HZV-l5-D-ERI 8 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61369

John S. Pachter, Esq. Armani Vadiee, Esq. Todd M. Garland, Esq.

Smith PachterMcWhorter PLC Tysons Comer, VA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney Robert B. Neill. Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: March 11, 2019
DONALD E. KimiER Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61369, Appeal ofVSE Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2556 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2556

   To make technical amendments to the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP 
Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 regarding the implementation of 
   the per diem prospective payment system for psychiatric hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2000

 Mr. Mack (for himself and Mr. Breaux) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make technical amendments to the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP 
Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 regarding the implementation of 
   the per diem prospective payment system for psychiatric hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO THE BBRA.

    (a) Per Diem Prospective Payment System for Psychiatric 
Hospitals.--Section 124 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced 
Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 1501A-332), as enacted into 
law by section 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106-113, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``October 1, 2001'' and 
        inserting ``October 1, 2000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``October 1, 2002'' and 
        inserting ``October 1, 2001''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of section 124 of the 
Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 1501A-332), as enacted into law by section 1000(a)(6) of 
Public Law 106-113.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.29






Exhibit 10.29




AGREEMENT




     THIS AGREEMENT MADE AND ENTERED INTO at Cleveland, Ohio this 31st day of May, 1999,
by and between FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC., an Ohio corporation, of Terminal Tower, 50 Public
Square, Suite 1100, Cleveland, Ohio 44113-2267, hereinafter referred to as “Company”, and ROBERT G.
O’BRIEN of 6925 Waterpepper Circle, Solon, Ohio 44139, hereinafter referred to as “Employee”.



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to grant to the Employee a benefit to his Estate upon his death,
and



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of this Company has recommended such benefit to be paid to
his Estate, and



     NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that in consideration of the Employee working for the Company, it
is agreed that:



     In consideration of his employment, if the Employee dies while in the employ of the Company,
the Company agrees to pay to the beneficiaries of the Employee as stipulated in his Will, or
designated by written notice to the Company from the Employee during his lifetime, or designated by
operation of law if the Employee dies intestate, an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of
the salary paid to the Employee for the last calendar year prior to the death, for a period of five
(5) years following the decease of said Employee; said sum to be payable in quarterly installments
to said beneficiaries of said deceased Employee.



     The parties hereto have set their hands the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC.

 	 
	 	/s/ CHARLES A. RATNER
 	 
	 	        Charles A. Ratner, President 	 
	 
	 	/s/ THOMAS G. SMITH
 	 
	 	        Thomas G. Smith, Secretary 	 
	 
	 	/s/ ROBERT G. O’BRIEN
 	 
	 	        Robert G. O’Brien, Employee
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Avenue Networks, Inc.
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, I, Sandra G. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ SANDRA G. THOMAS
    
    Chief Financial Officer
    
    May 10, 2005Sandra G. Thomas
# Votes

**

----

----

| Apr 11 | 124 (48-40) | Agreed to | On the Motion            | PN1252      |
|-------------|------------------|-----------|--------------------------|-------------|
| Apr 11 | 123 (49-44) | Agreed to | On the Motion to Proceed | PN1252      |
| Apr 10 | 122 (50-48) | Passed    | On the Joint Resolution  | H.J.Res. 98 |
| Apr 10 | 121 (53-47) | Passed    | On the Joint Resolution  | S.J.Res. 61 |
| Apr 10 | 120 (100-0) | Confirmed | On the Nomination        | PN1290      |

            Detailed Session List    

    Roll call vote results are compiled through the Senate Legislative Information System by the Senate bill clerk under the direction of the secretary of the Senate.  

----

----

          -  Cloture Motions 
          -  Senators Who Have Cast More than 10,000 Votes 

          -  "Vote-aramas" (1977 to Present) 
          -  Votes to Break Ties in the Senate  

----

          -  Senate Rule XII 

          -  Voting and Quorum Procedures in the Senate  (CRS) (PDF)        

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Historical Highlights 

Chester A. Arthur's Tie Breaking Vote, Mar 18, 1881

A Vote for Women, Sep 30, 1918

Civil Rights Filibuster Ended, Jun 10, 1964

About Voting

### Voting in the House 

Roll Call Votes (house.gov)

*House Voting Procedures* (CRS) (PDF)

### Glossary & Definitions 

proxy voting

roll call vote

unanimous consent

voice vote

yeas and nays
v150341_10-61 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.61
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-45349, 333-52489,333-40912, 333-48778, 333-76356 and 333-97821), in the Registration Statements on Form S-4 (Nos. 333-52232 and 333-63252) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-43059, 333-45351, 333-86681, 333-93419, 333-46816, 333-57778,333-59820, 333-61952, 333-72544, 333-73574, 333-76312, 333-89168, 333-108049, 333-112025, 333-116095 and 333-126819) of Polycom, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Jose, California 

February 28, 2008
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00003

- CR

JOE HENRY GARCIA

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas

Trial Cause No. S

- 14

- 3252CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 21, 2016
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of Independent Auditors



|MOEN AND COMPANY
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Member:
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
Institute of Chartered Accountants of British Columbia
Institute of Management Accountants (USA) (From 1965)

Registered with:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (USA) (PCAOB)
Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB)
Canada  - British Columbia Public Practice Licence







May 31, 2005

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption Experts and to the use of our report dated May 12, 2005 on the audited financial statements as at January 31, 2005, which appear in the Form 10-KSB of Amersin Life Sciences Corporation.







Yours very truly,

MOEN AND COMPANY,

Chartered Accountants



Moen and Company

(Signed)



Moen and Company







Exhibit 23.1
v150341_10-719 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.71.7
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-35992 and 333-56216) and Forms S-3 (Nos.
333-36682, 333-43750, 333-64414, 333-72554, 333-74390 and 333-103231) of SIGA
Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2003 relating to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

September 4, 2003
New York, New York
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00023-CV

WILLIAM RICHARDSON,

Appellant

v.

TWIN PEAKS INVESTMENT LLC, FRONT 

BURNER RESTAURANTS GP LLC, BRENT 

STROMAN, MANUEL CHAVEZ, PARNELL 

MCNAMARA AND JOHN DOE,

Appellees

From the 160th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-1448-3; MDL-16-00001; DC-15-0918

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals from an order from a MDL Pretrial Court in Dallas County. By 

letter dated January 28, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal 

was subject to dismissal because it appeared the notice of appeal was untimely, the trial 

court from which the order was rendered is not within this Court’s jurisdiction, and the 

Court may not have jurisdiction of an order from an MDL pretrial court. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b); 44.3. By the same letter, the Clerk warned appellant that the appeal would be 
Richardson v. Twin Peaks Investment LLC Page 2

dismissed unless, within 14 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing 

grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant was further warned that the failure to file 

a response as requested would also result in the dismissal of the appeal without further 

notification for failure to comply with this order or a notice from the Clerk. TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(c).

More than 14 days have passed and no response has been filed. Accordingly, this 

appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 44.3.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins1

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 27, 2019

[CV06] 

 

1 The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the 

Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003 (West 2013).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. Section 1350

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Greg D. Forrest, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   | /s/ Greg D. Forrest     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Greg D. Forrest         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | September 3, 2010  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) I, Louie Ucciferri, Corporate Secretary, and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18USC §§.1350, as adopted pursuant to §§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)


of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material


respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 6, 2011By: \s\Louie UcciferriLouie Ucciferri, Corporate Secretary, Acting Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.