alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
99th Congress, 2d Session House Document 99-271

VETO OF H.R. 2316

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

HIS VETO OF H.R. 2316, A BILL FOR THE RELIEF OF PAULETTE

MENDES-SILVA

Septem ber 25, 1986.—Message and accompanying bill referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary and ordered to be printed

71-011 O

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 1986
To the House of Representatives:

I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 2316, a bill for the relief of Paulette Mendes-Silva. This bill would give the United States District Court for the Dis­ trict of Columbia jurisdiction to hear Ms. Mendes-Silva’s claim that the Public Health Service was negligent in inoculating her against yellow fever on March 12, 1963, despite the fact that Ms. Mendes- Silva never filed an administrative claim or filed suit in a timely manner, as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act. While I feel sympathetic to Ms. Mendes-Silva because of her con­ dition, I cannot sign H.R. 2316 because there is no equitable basis for relief. The bill’s beneficiary failed to pursue the remedies avail­ able to her in a timely manner. Moreover, available medical evi­ dence contradicts her assertion that the Government was responsi­ ble for her disability. I am greatly concerned with the adverse precedential impact that my approval of H.R. 2316 would have upon litigation against the Federal government. There must be some limit to the time during which the Government must remain prepared to defend itself against specific claims. That limit is set forth in the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. at 2401(b). I am also greatly concerned that this private relief bill would allow a claimant to circumvent the orderly administrative process for asserting claims against the United States as prescribed by the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 2675. Other individuals who have also failed, for whatever reason, to file their claims within the required time, have been likewise precluded from the relief Ms. Mendes-Silva seeks in this bill. For these reasons, I cannot approve H.R. 2316.

Ronald Reagan.

The White House, September 25, 1986.
Unassociated Document


    


    JAG
Media Holdings, Inc.

    6865
S.W. 18th Street,
Suite B13

    Boca
Raton, FL 33433

    


    May 29,
2009

    


    YA Global
Investments, L.P.

    101
Hudson Street, Suite 3700

    Jersey
City, NJ 07302

    


    
      	
              Re:

            	
              Warrants
      to purchase shares of JAG Media Holdings, Inc. (“JAG Media”) held by YA
      Global Investments, L.P. (“YA
Global”).

            


    

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    This
letter shall set forth our understanding with respect to the warrant (the "Warrant") issued on
May 24, 2006 held by YA Global (Warrant No. CCP-5) to purchase 3,000,000 shares
of JAG Media's common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per
share.  The warrant is currently exercisable by YA Global on a cashless
basis.  For good and valuable consideration, YA Global and JAG Media
agree as follows: (a) the exercise price of 2,000,000 shares underlying the
warrant shall be reduced to $0.10 per share, (b) YA Global shall exercise these
2,000,000 shares on a cash basis, providing JAG
Media with $200,000 in cash proceeds, and (c) the exercise price of the
remaining 1,000,000 shares shall remain at $0.40 per share.  Warrant
No. CCP-5, and the underlying warrant shares, are not registered for resale and,
accordingly, the shares exercised on a cash basis shall be restricted and
subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144.

    


    In
connection with the agreements set forth herein, JAG Media represents that it
has proper approval and authority of its board of directors to enter into this
agreement, and that upon exercise and payment of the exercise price as set forth
above, the shares to be issued to YA Global shall be fully paid and validly
issued shares of JAG Media.

    


    If the
foregoing accurately reflects your understanding of our agreement regarding the
above matter, please indicate your agreement and acceptance by signing in the
appropriate space below and returning a fully executed and dated copy of this
agreement to the undersigned.

    


    Sincerely
yours,

    


    


    
      	
              JAG
      Media Holdings, Inc.

            	 
      	
              AGREED
      AND ACCEPTED:

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	
              YA
      Global Investments, L.P.

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	
              By:  Yorkville
      Advisors, LLC

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	
              Its:
      Investment Manager

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              By:

            	
              /s/
      Thomas J. Mazzarisi

            	 
      	
              By:

            	
              /s/
      Mark Angelo

            
	
              Name:  Thomas
      J. Mazzarisi

            	 
      	
              Name:
      Mark Angelo

            
	
              Title:
      Chairman and CEO

            	 
      	
              Title:
      Portfolio Manager
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549
                                   FORM 10-QSB/A

[Mark one]
            AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
[X]         QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
            OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997

                                       OR

[ ]         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
            15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ______________

Commission file number   0-13311

                             CityFed Financial Corp.
                             -----------------------
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

                   Delaware                           22-2527684
                   --------                           ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation        (IRS Employer
               or organization)                   Identification No.)

          PO Box 3126, Nantucket, MA                     02584
          --------------------------                     -----
   (Address of principal executive offices)           (Zip Code)

                              (508) 228-2366
                              --------------
                        (Issuer's telephone number)

Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes [X] No [ ]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity,  as of the latest  practicable  date. As of July 31, 1997, the number of
shares of outstanding common stock was 18,714,646.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ] No [X]


<PAGE>

                          PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

      (a)   Exhibits

      11.   Statement  Regarding  the  Computation  of  Per  Share  Loss.  Filed
            previously.

      27.   Financial Data Schedule - revised

      (b)   None





















                                       2
<PAGE>



                                 SIGNATURES

       In accordance  with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused  this  amendment  to  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf  by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                             CITYFED FINANCIAL CORP.

                               By: /s/ John W. Atherton, Jr.
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   John W. Atherton, Jr.
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer
                                      and Treasurer (Principal Executive
                                      and Financial Officer)

Date:  August 14, 1997




                                       3
#### A. STONEHOUSE and E. Stonehouse, Copartners, Respondents, v. GEORGE SMITH, Appellant.

(190 N. W. 314.)

Justices of the peace — service of undertaking with notice of appeal to district court jurisdictional.

Following Richardson v. Campbell, 9 N. D. 100, it is a jurisdictional prerequisite in appeals from justice’s court that the undertaking be served with the notice of appeal.

Opinion filed October 16, 1922.

Justices of the Peace, 35 C. J. § 449 p. 762 n. 13.

Note. — On necessity of filing undertaking with notice of appeal in justice’s court, see 16 R. C. L. 404; 3 R. C. L. Supp. 565.

Action in District Court, Grand Forks County, *Fnglert,*J.

*125Defendant has appealed from a judgment dismissing an appeal from the Justice’s Court.

Affirmed.

*P. A.*McClernan, for appellant.

*J. A.*Walsh> for respondents.

Bronson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an appeal from the justice’s court. Upon a trial had in the justice’s court judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs. Defendant appealed, but did not serve his undertaking upon plaintiffs or their attorney. For such failure the trial court dismissed the appeal. Defendant requests a construction of §§ 9163, 9165, and 9169, Comp. Laws. 1913, and their application to a litigant not in default. These sections were, respectively, §§ 6771, 6772, and 6776, Revised Codes 1895, forming a part of chapter 6, Justice’s Code, relating to appeals in civil actions. Section 6776 provides: “The undertaking given on appeal and appellant’s pleading, if the judgment appealed from was taken by default, must be served with a notice of appeal.” This section was amended by chap. 6, Laws of 1897, so as to read “The undertaking for appeal must be served with the notice; also appellant’s pleading when the judgment appealed from was taken by default.” Plainly, the statutory provision requires that the undertaking for appeal must be served in all cases with the notice. It is a jurisdictional prerequisite. This court has expressly so held in Richardson v. Campbell, 9 N. D. 100, 81 N. W. 31.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Bibdzell, Ch. J., and CheistiaNsoN, Geace, and RobiksoN, JJ., concur.
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4




SECOND ALLONGE

to

12.5% SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE NOTE DUE JULY 1, 2011 NO. __

dated                     , made by

BMP SUNSTONE CORPORATION

payable to the order of

                                                                   

in the original principal amount of

                                                            
 ($                    )




     That certain 12.5% Subordinated Convertible Note due July 1, 2011 described in the above
caption (the “Note”) is hereby amended as follows (all capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein having the same meanings assigned to them in the Note):



     (1) On the first page of the reverse of the Note, the second paragraph shall be amended and
restated as follows:




“Subject to and upon compliance with the provisions of Article XIV of the Indenture
and subject to the following paragraph, the Holder of this Security is entitled, at
his option, at any time after the close of business on May 15, 2009, to convert this
Security (or any portion of the principal amount hereof which is $1,000 or an
integral multiple thereof) (the “Conversion Amount”), at the principal amount
thereof, or of such portion, into fully paid and non-assessable shares (calculated
as to each conversion to the nearest 1/100 of a share) of Common Stock of the
Company (the “Common Shares”) at a conversion price per share of Common Stock equal
to $3.00 (the “Conversion Price”) (or at the current adjusted conversion price if
an adjustment has been made as provided in the Indenture).”



     (2) On the third page of the reverse of the Note, the second paragraph shall be deleted in its
entirety.



     (3) All other terms and conditions of the Note shall remain the same. This Allonge shall not
be deemed a novation of the Note; and except as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain
unmodified and in full force and effect. This Allonge shall be affixed to the Note and deemed to
constitute an integral part thereof. All references to the Note shall hereafter be deemed
references to the Note as amended by this Allonge.



[Signature Page Follows.]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be duly executed under its
corporate seal.



Dated:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	BMP SUNSTONE CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 



[Signature Page to Allonge to 12.5% Subordinated Convertible Note due July 1, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000743870
<NAME>                        Rancon Realty Fund IV
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         10,833
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    3,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,002
<PP&E>                                         35,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          660
<BONDS>                                        16,082
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52,433
<SALES>                                        5,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,185
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,341
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,014
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 5,457
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  61.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  61.67
        


</TABLE>
(logo)ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors of                                                   
HomeSide Lending, Inc.:


We have examined management's  assertion about HOMESIDE LENDING, INC. (a Florida
corporation) AND SUBSIDIARIES' compliance  with  the minimum servicing standards
identified in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's UNIFORM    SINGLE
ATTESTATION  PROGRAM FOR  MORTGAGE  BANKERS ("USAP") and that the Company had in
effect  fidelity  bond and errors and  omissions  policies  in the amount of $76
million  and $20  million,  respectively,  as of  February  28, 1997 and for the
period from March 16, 1996 to February  28, 1997,  included in the  accompanying
management  assertion  letter.  Management  is  responsible  for  the  Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity
bond and  errors  and  omissions  policy.  Our  responsibility  is to express an
opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the  Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing  standards and  maintenance of a fidelity bond and errors and
omission policy based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing    standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In  our  opinion,   management's  assertion  that  HomeSide  Lending,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries  complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards and
that the Company had in effect  fidelity bond and errors and omissions  policies
in the amount of $76 million and $20 million,  respectively,  as of February 28,
1997 and for the  period  from March 16,  1996 to  February  28,  1997 is fairly
stated in all material respects.

/s/Arthur Anderson LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
April 18,1997
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Frank C. Hart, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

May 26, 1936.

*Lawrence R. Condon,*for Marion Alexander Hart.

*Crawford & Sprague,*for the executors.

*Chadbourne, Stanchfield & Levy,*for Muriel Constance Woodworth Hart.

*Davies, Auerbach & Cornell,*for The Commercial National Bank and Trust Company of New York, general guardian of the property of Frank C. Hart, Jr., James A. Hart and Kerry Ann Hart, infants.

Foley, S.

The original decision of the surrogate herein (160 Misc. 198) directed the admission of the will and codicil to probate and reserved for further determination two additional issues, (1) the status of the respective claimants as the lawful wife of the testator, (2) the domicile of the testator and whether in the State of New York or in the State of Connecticut. The former issue has now been submitted upon a stipulation as to the facts. The conceded facts contained in it admit only of the following conclusions : that the testator never acquired a *bona fide*residence in the State of Nevada and that he established only a colorable residence merely for the purpose of invoking the aid of the Nevada courts to secure a divorce from Marion Alexander Hart.

In May of 1935 the testator brought an action for divorce against his wife, Marion Alexander Hart, in the State of Nevada. The defendant did not appear or answer in the action either in person or by attorney, nor was she served with the summons within the State of Nevada. The only alleged service of process upon her in *584the action was the service upon her without the State of Nevada and in the State of New York. The decree entered in the action by default on June 28,1935, was void. *(Fisher*v. *Fisher,*254 N. Y. 463; *Lefferts*v. *Lefferts,*238 App. Div. 37; affd., 263 N. Y. 131; *Haddock*v. *Haddock,*201 U. S. 562; *Olmsted*v. *Olmsted,*190 N. Y. 458; affd., 216 U. S. 386.) The subsequent marriage of the testator in Nevada to Muriel Constance Woodworth Hart immediately after the decree of divorce was invalid.

I accordingly hold that Marion Alexander Hart is the lawful widow of the testator. Submit supplemental decree on notice accordingly.

The remaining issue of the domicile of the testator at the time of his death will be set for trial in a subsequent direction of the surrogate.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 12.01



               Travelers Property Casualty Corp. and Subsidiaries
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                   (In millions of dollars, except for ratio)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year ended December 31,
                                                   ----------------------------------------------------------
                                                    1999         1998         1997         1996         1995
                                                   ------       ------       ------       ------       ------
<S>                                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income before federal income taxes and
  cumulative effect of changes in
  accounting principles                            $1,915       $1,837       $1,752        $ 487        $ 551
Interest                                              152          161          163          118           --
Portion of rentals deemed to be interest               47           49           55           45           33
                                                   ------       ------       ------       ------       ------
Income available for fixed charges                 $2,114       $2,047       $1,970        $ 650        $ 584
                                                   ======       ======       ======       ======       ======

Fixed charges:
    Interest                                        $ 152        $ 161        $ 163        $ 118        $  --
    Portion of rentals deemed to be interest           47           49           55           45           33
                                                   ------       ------       ------       ------       ------
Total fixed charges                                 $ 199        $ 210        $ 218        $ 163        $  33
                                                   ======       ======       ======       ======       ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 10.62x        9.75x        9.04x        3.99x       17.53x
                                                   ------       ------       ------       ------       ------
</TABLE>


The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
before income taxes and cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles
and fixed charges by the fixed charges. For purposes of this ratio, fixed
charges consist of that portion of rentals deemed representative of the
appropriate interest factor.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0002023

14-MAY-2014

08:00 AM
# States in the Senate | Wyoming Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

 1. Vacancy from Mar. 4, 1893 to Jan. 22, 1895 due to failure of the legislature to elect. Asahel C. Beckwith was appointed by the governor and presented his credentials to the Senate on Mar. 15, 1893, but he did not qualify. He resigned on July 11, 1893.

 2. Appointed to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Senator-elect Keith Thomson.

 3. Appointed to complete term expiring Jan. 3, 1979 having been elected to term being Jan. 3, 1979.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0343

ROBERT DANNELS,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILED

APR 2 7 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Justice Laurie McKinnon has recused herself from this matter, which has been set

for oral argument on June 10, 2020.

IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable Amy Eddy, District Judge, will sit as a

member of this Court in place of Justice McKinnon.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to

the Honorable Amy Eddy, District Judge.

DATED this Z3—day of April, 2020.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

04/27/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0343