alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2188 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2188

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 191.1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2000

Mr. Edwards (for himself and Mr. Helms) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 191.1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON PIGMENT YELLOW 191.1.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.32.00     Pigment Yellow   Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     191.1 (CAS No.                                                          31/2002          ''
                     154946-66-4)                                                                              .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     3204.17.60)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      2.5




**CSI Wireless TM [LOGO]**
                **4110 - 9th Street SE ŸCalgaryŸAB
                  CanadaŸT2G 3C4**
                **Phone (403) 259-3311 ŸFax (403)
                  259-8866**










August
      4,
      2006








Trace
      Technologies, LLC


4538
      S. -
      140 th Street


Omaha,
      Nebraska 68137


Attn:
      President





Gabriel
      Technologies Corporation


4538
      S. -
      140 th Street


Omaha,
      Nebraska 68137


Attn:
      President





Dear
      Sirs:





**Re:
      Closing Date Change in Asset Purchase Agreement for CSI Wireless LLC
      Location-Tag Assets**





Pursuant
      to Section 1.3 of the Asset Purchase Agreement dated July 25, 2006 among CSI
      Wireless, LLC (“CSI”), Trace Technologies, LLC (“Trace”) and Gabriel
      Technologies Corporation (“Gabriel”), (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”), the
      parties agree to change the Closing Date (as defined in the Asset Purchase
      Agreement), to Tuesday, August 8, 2006, or such other date as may be otherwise
      agreed to by CSI, Trace and Gabriel. In addition, the parties agree, if the
      Closing Date is August 8, 2006 in accordance with the above, with reference
      to
      those sections of the Asset Purchase Agreement (including without limitation
      its
      exhibits and schedules) that refer to Gabriel Shares and Pledged Shares, that
      the closing price of such shares shall be determined with reference to the
      closing price of Gabriel common shares on Friday, August 4, 2006,
      notwithstanding the parties’ prior agreement as to such reference date. All
      other terms and provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement shall remain
      unchanged and in full force and effect. Please acknowledge your consent and
      agreement to the above by signing the acknowledgement below and faxing a copy
      of
      this letter back to our office as soon as conveniently possible.





Yours
      truly,





CSI
      Wireless LLC











Per: /s/ Cameron
      Olson


Name:
      Cameron Olson


Office:
      President and CFO









I
      hereby
      acknowledge and consent to extending the


Closing
      Date of the Asset Purchase Agreement to


Tuesday,
      August 8, 2006, or such other date as may


be
      otherwise agreed to by CSI, Trace and Gabriel.





Dated
      this 4 th day of
      August, 2006




Trace Technologies, LLC
              
              
              /s/
                Keith R.
                Feilmeier
              Per:
              Name: Keith R. Feilmeier
              Title: CEO
            Gabriel Technologies Corporation
              
              
              
              /s/
                Keith R.
                Feilmeier
              Per:
              Name: Keith R. Feilmeier
              Title: CEO
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28021-28022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11954]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $400 million long-
term

[[Page 28022]]

guarantee to support the export of approximately $450 million worth of 
mining equipment and services to Mexico. The U.S. exports will enable 
the Mexican company to produce, on average, 50,900 metric tons of 
copper, 1,500 metric tons of cobalt, and 25,200 metric tons of zinc 
sulfate monohydrate (ZSM) per year during the 12-year repayment term of 
the guarantee. Available information indicates that new Mexican 
production of copper and cobalt will be sold in South Korea and 
international markets. New Mexican production of ZSM will be sold in 
the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. Interested parties may submit 
comments on this transaction by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0461676b6a6b696d672a6d697465677044617c6d692a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8eebede1e0e1e3e7eda0e7e3feefedfaceebf6e7e3a0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a> or 
by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Room 947, Washington, DC 20571, 
within 14 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Jonathan J. Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-11954 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Egburt E. Woodbury and Others, Together Constituting the State Board of Tax Commissioners, and the City of Buffalo, Respondents. (1908 Assessment.)

Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred, except Kellogg and Sewell, JJ., dissenting in part, being of the opinion that the relator is not assessable for street occupation where the street was opened and extended across the right of way the fee of which had been purchased by and conveyed to the relator before the street was opened.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 93 (Friday, May 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2010-OS-0052]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records; Correction

AGENCY: National Security Agency/Central Security Service, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to amend a system of records; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21250), DoD published a notice 
announcing its intent to amend an existing Privacy Act system of 
records. In one instance an incorrect system ID number was cited. This 
notice corrects that error.

DATES: Effective May 14, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Anne Hill at 301-688-6527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 23, 2010, DoD published a notice 
announcing its intent to amend an existing Privacy Act system of 
records: The NSA Police Operational Files. Subsequent to the 
publication of that notice, DoD discovered that the system ID number 
was missing a zero in one instance (page 21251). This notice corrects 
that information.
    The system ID number on page 21250 is correct.

Correction

    In the notice (FR Doc. 2010-9393), published on April 23, 2010 (75 
FR 21250) make the following correction. On page 21251, in the second 
column, line 1, correct the system ID number ``GNSA 2'' to read ``GNSA 
20''.

    Dated: May 11, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-11580 Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      have
      issued our reports dated March 3, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial
      statements and schedule (which reports expressed an unqualified opinion and
      contain an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial
      Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “ *Accounting
      for Uncertainty in Income Taxes* ,”
      Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
“ *Considering
      the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
      Current Year Financial Statements* ,”
and
      Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123(R), “ *Share-Based
      Payment* ”)
      and
      management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting included in the Annual Report of Metropolitan Health Networks, Inc.
      on
      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of
      Metropolitan Health Networks, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-122976, effective
      February 24, 2005).





/s/
      GRANT
      THORNTON LLP





Miami,
      Florida


March
      3,
      2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         108,161
<SECURITIES>                                    85,294
<RECEIVABLES>                                      267
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (33)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               193,916
<PP&E>                                          26,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,049)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 398,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          243,536
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   398,136
<SALES>                                          1,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,341
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (696)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,873<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,175
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (96,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (96,698)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.65)
<FN>
<F1>Net of interest income of $4,057
</FN>


</TABLE>
(September 26, 1912.)

#### HERCULITH COMPANY, LTD., a Corporation, Respondent, v. J. GUSTAFSON, Appellant.

[126 Pac. 1050.]

Verdict — Sufficiency op Evidence — Errors in Law — Instructions.

(Syllabus by the court.)

1. Under the provisions of see. 4824, Rev. Codes, when there is substantial evidence to support the verdict, it must not be set aside.

2. *Held,*that the court did not err in rejecting certain evidence offered by the defendant.

3. *Held,*that the court did not err in refusing to give certain instructions requested by the defendant.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District for Ada County. Hon. Carl A. Davis, Judge.

*538Action to recover on two promissory notes. Judgment for plaintiff.

*Affirmed.*

Wyman & Wyman and R. R. Wedekind, for Appellant.

Cavanah, Blake & MacLane, for Respondent.

Counsel cite no authorities on point decided.

SULLIVAN, J.

This action was brought to recover on two promissory notes, one for $250 and the other for $500, and interest. Said notes bear date of February 27, 1911, and were given in payment for 750 shares of capital stock of the plaintiff corporation, of the par value of one dollar each. The respondent company was engaged in the manufacture of tile-ñooring material, artificial marble and enamel bricks, used in the construction of buildings and for other purposes.

As a defense to said action the appellant alleged fraud and misrepresentation on the part of the officers and agents of the company, respecting the quality and character of the material manufactured by defendant, and that it was through such false and fraudulent representations that he was induced to purchase said stock and to execute said notes.

The case was tried by the court with a jury and resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the respondent company. This appeal is from the judgment.

The assignments of error go to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and alleged errors in the rulings of the court in regard to the admission of certain evidence, and the refusal to give certain instructions offered by the defendant.

After a careful examination of the evidence, we are satisfied that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the verdict, and we are admonished by the provisions of sec. 4824, Rev. Codes, that in such a case the verdict should not be set aside.

On an examination of the rulings of the court in regard to the admission of certain evidence, we are satisfied that the court did not err in its rulings in regard thereto. The in-*539struetions given by the court fairly cover the law of the case, and it was not error for the court to refuse to give the instructions requested by counsel for the defendant.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Costs in favor of respondent.

Stewart, C. J., and Ailshie, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  2,242,988
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                           3,646,357
<ALLOWANCES>                              213,204
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        6,346,195
<PP&E>                                  1,303,404
<DEPRECIATION>                            372,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          7,437,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,607,047
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                   36,807
<OTHER-SE>                              3,750,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            7,437,893
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        8,397,680
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           6,125,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          188,204
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         32,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (1,703,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                               20,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (1,703,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           (1,703,250)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.46)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2152 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2152

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on high tenacity single 
                         yarn of viscose rayon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

 Mr. Hollings (for himself and Mr. Thurmond) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on high tenacity single 
                         yarn of viscose rayon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
    

``             9902.xx.xx     High tenacity      Free        No change        No change       On or before
                               yarn of viscose                                                 12/31/2004
                               rayon: Single
                               yarn (provided
                               for in
                               subheading
                               5403.10.30).....
 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to goods entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 
15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

National Forests in Mississippi, USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of New Recreation Fee Site.

# SUMMARY:

Bethel Motorcycle and Bethel ATV Trails are located near Saucier, MS. Currently, the Bethel Motorcycle trail contains a 17-mile single track trail and the Bethel ATV Trail contains 39 miles of trail. Both sites contain an information board, toilet facilities, and parking; and security is provided. The Forest Service proposes to charge $10 per operator for access to these trails.  A $60 annual pass will also be available for purchase by the public. This annual pass could be used for access to three other motorized trails in the National Forests in Mississippi and would be valid for 12 months. The fees listed are only proposed and will be determined upon further analysis and public comments. All funds received from these fees would be used for continued operation and maintenance of the facility and allow additional amenities to be added to enhance the recreational experience at the facility. Comparable recreational use fees are being proposed at other sites that provide similar recreational opportunities in Mississippi.

# DATES:

Comments will be accepted through November 1, 2010. Implementation of fees is proposed to take place in fiscal year 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeff Gainey, Recreation Program Manager, 601-965-1617, National Forests in Mississippi, 100 West Capitol Street, Suite 1141, Jackson, MS 39269.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act (Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to publish advance notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     whenever new recreation fee areas are established.                

Dated: April 28, 2010.

Margrett L. Boley,

Forest Supervisor, National Forest in Mississippi.

[FR Doc. 2010-11040 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11519 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
MARCUS NELSON DEES,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-69-ALL-Y

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Marcus Nelson Dees appeals his 60-month sentence following his guilty plea to possession of sexually explicit visual depictions of

a minor, which images had been shipped and tran sported in
interstate commerce. Dees argues that he was sentenced in
contravention of United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005)
because the sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(1)

and U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3) were based on facts not admitted by him or found by a jury.No. 04-11519 -2- In the present case, the district court stated that it would

s entence Dees to the same sentence (60 months in prison) i n the

event that the guidelines were held unconstitutional. Thus, the

Gov ernment has pointed to record evidence demonstrating beyond a
reasonable doubt that the federal constitutional error of which

Dess complains did not contribute to the sentence that he received.

See United States v. Akpan , 407 F.3d 360, 377 (5th Cir. 2005).
Therefore the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.