alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      In  connection  with the annual  report of ICTS  International,  N.V. (the
"Company")  on Form 20-F for the period  ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Avraham Dan, Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Avraham Dan
    ---------------
    Avraham Dan, Managing Director and CFO

Dated: July 17, 2007
#### In the Matter of John E. Ellison.

Motion denied. Order to be settled on notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     [9/30/96 Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations]
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             58
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    26,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               33,662
<PP&E>                                         25,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 75,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,290
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       41,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   75,653
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,931
<CGS>                                           4,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (440)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (463)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .00
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26794-26795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,420; TA-W-73,420A]


Alticor, Inc., Including Access Business Group International LLC 
and Amway Corporation, Buena Park, CA; Alticor, Inc., Including Access 
Business Group International LLC, and Amway Corporation, Ada, MI; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on April 12, 2010, applicable to workers of Alticor, Inc., including 
Access Business Group International LLC and Amway Corporation, Buena 
Park, California. The notice will soon be published in the Federal 
Register.
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to financial and procurement services.
    New findings show that the intent of the petitioner was to cover 
both the

[[Page 26795]]

Buena Park, California and the Ada, Michigan locations of the subject 
firm. The relevant data supplied by Alticor, Inc. to the Department 
during its' investigation included both the Buena Park, California and 
the Ada, Michigan locations.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
include workers of the Ada, Michigan location of Alticor, Inc., 
including Access Business Group International LLC and Amway 
Corporation.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in 
financial and procurement services to Costa Rica.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,420 and TA-W-73,420A are 
hereby issued as follows:

    All workers of Alticor, Inc., including Access Business Group 
International LLC and Amway Corporation, Buena Park, California (TA-
W-73,420) and Alticor, Inc., including Access Business Group 
International LLC and Amway Corporation, Ada, Michigan, (TA-W-
73,420A), who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after February 1, 2009, through April 12, 2012, and all 
workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on date of certification through two years from the 
date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 28th day of April 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-11270 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit
        32
 Section
        1350 Certification
  **STATEMENT
        FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer or Principal Accounting
      Officer of Minghua Group International Holdings Limited. This Certification
      is
      made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
      Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Minghua Group
      International Holdings Limited for the year ended December 31, 2005.





The
      undersigned certifies that such 10-KSB Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that the information contained in such 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Minghua
      Group International Holdings Limited as of December 31, 2005.





This
      Certification is executed as of July 27, 2006




*By:
                /s/ Chang-de Li*
              
              *Name:
                Chang-de Li*
              *Title:
                Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer*
              *(Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Minghua Group International Holdings Limited and will be retained by Minghua
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
# Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairpersons

**

----

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Related Link 

About Parties and Leadership

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
#### AMERICAN STATE BANK OF BALFOUR, NORTH DAKOTA, Formerly German American State Bank of Balfour, North Dakota, Respondent, v. JOHN ODEGAARD et al. BOVEY-SHUTE & JACKSON, Inc. (the Only Answering Defendant), Defendant and Appellant.

(208 N. W. 114.)

Case held governed hy decision in prior case.

This case is governed by the decision rendered in the ease of Bovey-Shute & Jackson, formerly Bovey-Shute Lumber Co., a Corporation, v. John Odegaard, E. C. Stone, Ellen Stone, A. L. Lombard and N. B. Anderson, ante, 871, 208 N. W. Ill, decided at this term.

Opinion filed December 31, 1925.

Rehearing denied March 17, 1926.

Appeal from the District Court of McHenry County, Lowe, J.

Affirmed.

*Binness, Duffy & Wheeler*(A. *B. Jachson,*of Counsel), for appellant.

*D. J. O’Connell*and *Paul Campbell,*for respondent.

Burice, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage executed on the 12th day of December, 1908, to secure the payment of one principal note for $1,200 and two coupon notes for $72 each; and which mortgage covers the southwest quarter of section 5 in township 151 north of range 78, west of the 5th principal meridian in the county of Mc-Henry, North Dakota. The said land being the same land involved In the case of Bovey-Shute & Jackson, formerly Bovey-Shute Lumber ‘Company, a Corporation, v. John Odegaard, Rosa Odegaard, E. O. Stone, A. L. Lombard and N. E. Anderson. The mortgage is the *879$],200 mortgage described in said action, which action was decided at the present term of this court.

The defendant the Bovey-Shute & Jackson Lumber Company in its answer claims title superior to plaintiff’s mortgage, under the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien filed for record, on the 29th day of November, 1911, judgment of foreclosure having been duly entered on ■the 2oth day of March, 1919. The said defendant purchased said land on sale under a special execution in the foreclosure action on the :31st day of May, 1919. There was no redemption from said sale. At the trial the defendant offered in evidence the record of the action foreclosing said lien and the plaintiff offered in evidence the records and files of the said case of the Bovey-Shute Lumber Co. tried at this term.

The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of the plaintiff upon which judgment was duly entered and from which the Bovey-Shute Lumber Company appeals. The contention of the defendant is that its title under the foreclosure of the mechanic’s lien is superior to the plaintiff’s mortgage. This court at the present term having decided that the mortgage was prior and superior to the mechanic’s lien the judgment in the case at bar must be and is affirmed.

ChbistiaNSON, Oh. J., and Biedzell, Nuessle, and Johnson, JJ., ■concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000743870
<NAME>                        RANCON REALTY FUND IV
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                          1,034
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   37
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     4,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,071
<PP&E>                          62,504
<DEPRECIATION>                  13,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  56,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           689
<BONDS>                         22,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      33,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    56,286
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,298
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,256
<LOSS-PROVISION>                378
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (14.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (14.99)
        


</TABLE>
DISSENT and Opinion Filed August 27 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 19
- 01141
- CV CITY OF SAGINAW, TEX AS , Appellant

V. BRANDON CRUZ , Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 19227 DISSENTING OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Partida

- Kipness, and Nowell Dissenting Opinion by Justice Schenck I regret that I am unable to join the majorit y in its conclusion to affirm the denial of the City’s plea to the jurisdiction. The majority cites Bland Indep endent Sch ool Dist rict v. Blue for the general proposition that th e purpose of a plea to the jurisdiction is to “defeat a cause of action without regard to whether the claims asserted have merit.” 34 S.W.3d 547, 554 (Tex. 2000)

. Bland was a taxpayer standing case. As we have noted in the past, standing and other general jurisdiction challenges are quite different from jurisdictional challenges u nder the Texas Tort Claims Act, which makes the waiver of immunity– 2

–

to suit “co

- extensive with liability.” City of Dallas v. E

. Vill

. Ass ’n , 480 S.W.3d 37, 46 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2015, pet. denied).
I believe the Texas Supreme Court and this Court have thus adopted a different scope of inquiry in these cases , s ee Tex as Dep artmen t of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda , 1 33 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004) , because t he Texas Tort Claims Act waives immunity from suit but only “to the extent of liability created by [the Act].” E. Vill. Ass’ n , 480 S.W.3d at 46 (quoting T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 101.025(a) )

. The Texas Tort Claims Act expressly waives sovereign immunity in three areas: “use of publicly owned automobiles, premises defects, and injuries arising out of conditions or use of property.” Miranda , 133 S.W.3d at 224. Texas courts have held that where a spec ial defect exists, the State owes the same duty to warn as a private landowner owes to an invitee , one that requires the State to use ordinary care to protect an invitee from a dangerous condition of which the owner is or reasonably should be aware

. See Reyes v. City of Laredo , 335 S.W.3d 605, 606

– 07 (Tex. 2010) (per curiam). Accordingly , the immunity waiver under the Texas Tort Claims Act is intertwined with the merits of a claim under that act. Id. In this case, the record contains no evidence of the nature of the defect, actual knowledge of the defect, how long the defect existed, or that a reasonable inspection would have discovered the defect

. Thus , t he majority opinion appears to conclude the City is strictly liable for the alleged defect that caused appellee’s injuries. Cf

. CMH Homes, Inc. v. Daenen , 15 S.W.3d 97, 102

– 03 (Tex. 2000) ( holding– 3

–

constructive knowledge in premises cases c an be established by showing condition existed long enough for owner or occupier to have discovered it upon reasonable inspect ion ) ; Tex. Dep’ t of Transp. v. Jackson , 528 S.W.3d 598, 608 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2017, pet. denied).
Because I disagree with the maj ority’s conclusion, I respectfully dissent.

191141DF.P05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
**Exhibit 10.34**

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

Between 

Mirant Corporation 

and 

James V. Iaco 

This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“the Amendment”) ismade as of August 11, 2006, between Mirant Corporation (the “Company”), Mirant Services, LLC (“Services”) and James V. Iaco (“Executive”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shallhave the same meaning as set forth in the Employment Agreement executed by the parties on November 3, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”). 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and in compliance with Section 18 of the Employment Agreement, the parties hereto agree to amend the EmploymentAgreement as follows: 

The portion of Section 5(a) of the Employment Agreement that states: 

Severance. 

(a)Termination Without Cause, Non-Renewal or for Good Reason. In the event of Executive’s termination of employment with the Company (1) by the Company without Cause (as defined herein), (2) by reason of the failure of the Companyto offer to renew the Agreement on terms that are based on competitive practices for companies of comparable size and standing in the same industry, or (3) by Executive for Good Reason (as defined herein), subject to the execution of a Releasesubstantially in the form attached as Exhibit D, Executive shall be entitled to the benefits set forth in this Section 5(a). 

shall hereby be amendedto state as follows: 

Severance. 

(a) Termination Without Cause, Non-Renewal or for Good Reason. In the event of Executive’s termination of employment with the Company (1) by the Company without Cause (as defined herein), (2) byreason of the failure of the Company to offer to renew the Agreement on terms and conditions at least equal to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement executed on November 3, 2005, which shall be deemed to include a Base Salary andTarget Bonus at least equal to the Executive’s Base Salary and Target Bonus at such time, or (3) by Executive for Good Reason (as defined herein), subject to the execution of a Release substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D,Executive shall be entitled to the benefits set forth in this Section 5(a). 

The terms of this Amendment shall have no force and effect on any other provision of the EmploymentAgreement, including subsections (i) through (v) of Section 5(a). Upon execution, the terms of this Amendment shall be incorporated into the Employment Agreement and shall become binding and enforceable to the same extent and underthe same terms and conditions as all other provisions in the Employment Agreement when executed on November 3, 2005. 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 

 
**MIRANT CORPORATION**By:   Patricia A. BarnardIts: SVP, Administration**MIRANT SERVICES, LLC**By:   Patricia A. BarnardIts: SVP, Administration **James V. Iaco**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUSTIN W. YIM,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 644 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
v150341_10-44 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.44
Exhibit 99.1(b)
                                                                 
                       Long Beach Mortgage
                             Company


                      OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
                 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
                                
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS SERIES
               1996-1, 1996-2, 1996-3, AND 1996-4
                                
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE SECTION OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED
POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENTS, I, PATRICIA L. WAYMAN, AND
SHAWNA R. OGILVIE OF LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY, (THE
"SERVICER") HEREBY CERTIFIY:

(i)  A REVIEW OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SERVICER DURING THE
     PRECEDING CALENDAR YEAR, AND OF PERFORMANCE UNDER THESE
     AGREEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE UNDER OUR SUPERVISION.

(ii) TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, BASED ON SUCH REVIEW, THE
     SERVICER HAS FULFILLED ALL ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THESE AGREEMENTS
     THROUGHOUT SUCH YEAR.

CERTIFIED THIS 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 1997.



BY: \s\ PATRICIA L. WAYMAN    
       PATRICIA L. WAYMAN     
       PRESIDENT              
                              
BY: \s\ SHAWNA R. OGILVIE     
       SHAWNA R. OGILVIE      
       VICE PRESIDENT
#### William J. McKee, Appellant, v. Wilham C. Hackney, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fedders Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert
L. Laurent, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


                                        /s/ ROBERT L. LAURENT, JR.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert L. Laurent, Jr.
                                        Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 10, 2006


                                       32