alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# States in the Senate | Massachusetts

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

**Elizabeth Warren (D)***Hometown: Cambridge*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

**Edward J. Markey (D)***Hometown: Malden*

----

                Contact            

----

                Committee Assignments                Biographical Directory Listing

Massachusetts became the sixth state to join the Union on February 6, 1788. Massachusetts's first two senators, Tristram Dalton and Caleb Strong, took office on March 4, 1789. The state's longest-serving senators include George Hoar (1877–1904), Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr. (1893–1924), and Edward Kennedy (1962–2009). Among those who rose to leadership positions are Lodge and Leverett Saltonstall, both of whom served as Republican Conference chairmen. Four men from Massachusetts have served as vice president of the United States and therefore as the Senate's constitutional president or presiding officer: John Adams, Elbridge Gerry, Henry Wilson, and Calvin Coolidge. John F. Kennedy became the second sitting senator to be elected president of the United States.

Return to map

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Can't Find Your Senator? 

Can't find your senator's name? Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former senator, or a senator in your State Legislature.
EXHIBIT
32.2





SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT SECTION 906


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350




I, Scott
A. Oboy, the Chief Financial Officer of Commercial Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Scott
A. Oboy


Chief
Financial Officer


Dated:  March
31, 2010
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.3

[GRUPO CCR LETTERHEAD]

FREE TRANSLATION

                                                  Buenos Aires, January 26, 2004

Mr. Francis Cressall
Quilmes Industrial S.A. (Quinsa)
Ave. Juan Domingo Peron 667
Capital Federal
Present

Ref: 20-F Registration to The New York Stock Exchange

CCR-IRI, as a provider of information, authorizes Quilmes Industrial S.A.
(Quinsa), to use our reports on the beer industry in Paraguay corresponding to
the years 1996 to 2004 in the company's annual report and in its Form 20-F.

We further consent to the use of our name in such Form 20-F which attaches this
consent as an exhibit thereto and to the incorporation of this consent into any
form that the Company must file.

/s/ Josefina Giordano
Commerical Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,153
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             189
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    189,039
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        284,614
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 515,566
<DEPOSITS>                                     362,141
<SHORT-TERM>                                    65,658
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,288
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,784
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 515,566
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,158
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,830
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   194
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,182
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,454
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,558
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,624
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,416
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,416
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.00
<LOANS-NON>                                        933
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,018
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,368
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      166
<RECOVERIES>                                       111
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,313
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,381
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,932


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.36**

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

Between 

Mirant Corporation 

and 

Edward R. Muller 

This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“the Amendment”)is made as of August 11, 2006, between Mirant Corporation (the “Company”), Mirant Services, LLC (“Services”) and Edward R. Muller (“Executive”). Capitalized terms used herein and not definedshall have the same meaning as set forth in the Employment Agreement executed by the parties on September 30, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”). 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and in compliance with Section 19 of the Employment Agreement, the parties hereto agree to amend the EmploymentAgreement as follows: 

The portion of Section 6(a) of the Employment Agreement that states: 

Severance. 

(a)Termination Without Cause, Non-Renewal or for Good Reason. In the event of Executive’s termination of employment with the Company (1) by the Company without Cause (as defined herein), (2) by reason of the failure of the Companyto offer to renew the Agreement on terms that are based on competitive practices for companies of comparable size and standing in the same industry, or (3) by Executive for Good Reason (as defined herein), subject to the execution of a Releasesubstantially in the form attached as Exhibit D, Executive shall be entitled to the benefits set forth in this Section 6(a). 

shall hereby be amendedto state as follows: 

Severance. 

(a) Termination Without Cause, Non-Renewal or for Good Reason. In the event of Executive’s termination of employment with the Company (1) by the Company without Cause (as defined herein), (2) byreason of the failure of the Company to offer to renew the Agreement on terms and conditions at least equal to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement executed on September 30, 2005, which shall be deemed to include a Base Salaryand Target Bonus at least equal to the Executive’s Base Salary and Target Bonus at such time, or (3) by Executive for Good Reason (as defined herein), subject to the execution of a Release substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D,Executive shall be entitled to the benefits set forth in this Section 6(a). 

The terms of this Amendment shall have no force and effect on any other provision of the EmploymentAgreement, including subsections (i) through (v) of Section 6(a). Upon execution, the terms of this Amendment shall be incorporated into the Employment Agreement and shall become binding and enforceable to the same extent and underthe same terms and conditions as all other provisions in the Employment Agreement when executed on September 30, 2005. 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 

 
**MIRANT CORPORATION**By:   Patricia A. BarnardIts: SVP, Administration**MIRANT SERVICES, LLC**By:   Patricia A. BarnardIts: SVP, Administration **Edward R. Muller**
EX-10.84c







Exhibit No. 10.84c




October 29, 2008




Via Certified Mail – Return Receipt Request




Mr. Frederick Tomarchio

Mt. Airy South Main Street, LLC

P.O. Box 55

Glenelg, MD 21237




	 	 	 
	RE:

	 	Lease Agreement dated September 2, 1999 by and between Mt. Airy South Main Street, LLC,
successor in interest to LPR Associates (“Landlord”) and Monro Muffler Brake, Inc., successor
in interest to Mr. Tire, Inc. (“Tenant”) for premises situate at 1312 South Main Street, Mt.
Airy, MD [MMB #765]






Dear Fred:



Please accept this letter as Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.’s official notification of our intent to
renew said lease agreement for the first five-year renewal period commencing on December 19, 2009
and expiring December 18, 2014. The rent for said renewal period shall be $11,193.66 per month.




Tenant shall have five five-year renewal options remaining.



Please do not hesitate to contact me at 800-876-6676 ext. 3384 if you have any questions relative
to the renewal.




Very truly yours,




/s/ Thomas M. Aspenleiter




Thomas M. Aspenleiter

VP Real Estate




TMA:mc
**Applied Signal Technology, Inc.Exhibit 32.2**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to   18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Report of Applied Signal Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Doyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ James E. Doyle       --------------------------------------------------------- | Date: August 31, 2006      -------------------------------- |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| James E. Doyle,      Vice President and      Chief Financial Officer               |                                                        |
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________ No. SC17

- 839

____________

MARK A. TWILEGAR, Appellant,

vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
[November 2, 2017]

PER CURIAM

. Mark A. Twilegar, a prisoner under sentence of death , appeals the circuit
court’s order denying his successive motion for postconviction relief filed under

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 seeking relief from his death sentence

pursuant to Hurst v. Florida , 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and Hurst v. State , 202 So. 3d
40 (Fla. 2016)
, cert. denied , 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017) . We have jurisdiction. See a rt.

V, § 3(b)(1), Fl a. Const.
As the circuit court correctly recognized
, the Hurst decisions do not apply to

defendants like Twilegar who waived a penalty phase jury. See Mullens v. State
, 197 So. 3d 16, 38

- 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , 137 S. Ct. 672 (2017); s ee also- 2

-

Brant v. State , 197 So. 3d 1051, 1079 (Fla. 2016). Although Twilegar urges this

Court to revisit , in light of the Hurst decisions, its prior holding in Twilegar’s
direct appeal that his waiver was knowing, i ntelligent , and voluntary
, see Twilegar

v. State , 42 So. 3d 177, 204 (Fla. 2010), cert. denied , 562 U.S. 1225 (2011)
, that
argument is without me rit. See Mullens
, 197 So. 3d at 39

- 40 (explaining that a
defendant “cannot subvert the right to jury factfinding by waiving that right and
then suggesting that a subsequent development in the law has fundamentally
undermined his sentence”)

. Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s denial.

It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.
An Appeal from the Circuit Co urt in and for Lee County, Ramiro Mañalich, Judge

- Case No. 362003CF002151000ACH
Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Suzanne Myers Keffer, Chief Assistant, and Scott Gavin, Staff Attorney, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Regi on, Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
for Appellant
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Timothy A. Freeland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida,
for Appellee
APPROVED RESOLUTION

AUGUST 31, 2011, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE BALLOT

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, approves the appointment of Mary Wilkie Ebrahimi and Constance Corcoran Miller

and the reappointment of James W. Lintott to the Board of Trustees of the Freer Gallery of Art

and the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery for four‐year terms effective September 14, 2011.  

[2011.08.03]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roaming Messenger, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005  (the
"Report")  I,  Jonathan  Lei,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  President,  and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18USC ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant  to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 17, 2005

\s\ Jonathan Lei
--------------------------
Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAOP22-0432JERRYJOEHENDERSON,Petitioner,v.JIMSALMONSEN,Warden,MONTANASTATEPRISON,Respondent.AUG23202213,-•Cle:c,S!_:pre.meCountIvIontanaORDERJerryJoeHendersonhasfiledapetitionforawritofhabeascorpus,requestingcorrectionofhissentence.HeexplainsthatallbutthefirstfiveyearsofhissentencetotheDepartmentofCorrectionsshouldbesuspended,pursuantto§46-18-201(3)(a)(iv)(A),1MCA.Headdsthathewasconvictedunder§45-5-502,MCA,not§45-5-503(4),MCA.Hendersonalsorequeststheassistanceofcounsel.InJuly2019,theGallatinCountyDistrictCourtsentencedHendersontotheMontanaStatePrisonforthirtyyearswithfifteenyearssuspendedforsexualassaultafterthisCourtremandedthematterupontheState'sconcessionconcerningHenderson'spleatoasexualoffense.SeeStatev.Henderson,No.DA17-0593,Order(Mont.Jan.22,2019).Hendersonisrnistaken.TheDistrictCourtnevercommittedhimtotheDepartmentofCorrections.Thepartofthisstatute,§46-18-201(3)(a)(iv)(A),MCA,doesnotapplytohim.Section46-18-201(3)(a)(iii),MCA,appliestoHendersonhere.TheapplicablestatuteprovidesthataDistrictCourtmaysentenceanoffendertoa"termofincarceration,asprovidedinTitle45fortheoffense,atacountydetentioncenteroratastateprisontobedesignatedbythedepartmentofcorrections[J"Section46-18-201(3)(a)(iii),MCA(2011).'Hendersonincorrectlycitesto§46-18-201(3)(a)(iv)(B),MCA,thatconcernsayouthtransferredtoaDistrictCourtforadjudication.08/23/2022Case Number: OP 22-0432While

the Department

of Corrections

may decide

the placernent,

the court imposes

a prison sentence

under Montana

law.

Here,

the offense

of sexual

assault

has

a punishment

of anywhere

between

four

to 100 years

in prison, pursuant

to

§ 45-5-502(3),

MCA,

when

the victim

is younger

than

16 years

of age

and

the offender

is older

by three

or more years. Henderson

received

a fifteen-year

prison sentence

that

is valid under

the statutes. Henderson

has

not demonstrated

illegal incarceration.

Section 46-22-101(1),

MCA. He

has

also

not shown

that

he has

a facially

invalid sentence. Henderson

is not entitled

to any correction

of his sentence.

Therefore, IT

IS ORDERED

that Henderson's

Petition

for Writ

of Habeas

Corpus

is DENIED and DISMISSED.

IT

IS FURTHER

ORDERED

that Henderson's

request

for assistance

of counsel

is DENIED,

as rnoot. The Clerk

is directed

to provide

a copy

of this Order

to counsel

of record

and

to Jerry

Joe Henderson

persona

y. DATED

this

ay

of August,

2022.

Chief Justice 2
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Senate Convened 1/20 1/4 1/3 1/4 1/3 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/6 1/4 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3

Senate Adjourned 12/8 12/22 12/9 12/31 1/2 12/24 12/22 1/3 1/3 1/3 12/16 12/18 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3 1/3

Days in Session 133 159 138 189 184 191 158 170 153 156 136 168 165 195 191 187 192 192 178 178

Hours in Session 1,031'31 1,222'26 1,027'48 1,375'54 988'31 1,420'39 1,074’40 1,101’44 930’12 1,095'12 908'15 1,073'39 780’58 1,166'34 1,015'29 947'46 963'52 1083'11 958'32 841'11

Average Hours per Day 7.7 7.7 7.4 7.2 5.37 7.44 6.8 6.5 6.1 7 6.7 6.4 4.7 5.98 5.32 5.07 5.02 5.6 5.4 4.7

Total Measures Passed 663 624 635 621 589 478 569 402 479 356 501 441 485 438 641 506 510 423 629 401

Roll Call Votes 216 366 279 442 215 397 299 235 251 291 366 339 163 325 274 428 292 528 421 352

Quorum Calls 1 3 1 6 3 3 8 5 0 13 1 6 0 3 2 2 5 4 0 2

Public Laws 300 169 313 180 280 125 258 90 193 73 224 115 213 100 238 105 179 141 101 40

Treaties Ratified 15 6 14 8 30 1 6 2 0 0 4 0 7 1 6 5 0 0 4 1

Nominations Confirmed 24,420 25,942 29,603 22,892 21,785 23,051 23,327 19,815 24,296 17,328 18,354 17, 578 21,477 19,612 21,751 20,242 21,617 22,567 19,714 22,355

Average Voting Attendance 95.54 97.41 97.13 94.99 94.36 96.99 95.88 97.08 96.65 97.31 95.64 97.16 95.61 98.00 96.76 94.25 94.72 96.45 95.85 95.77

Sessions Convened Before 12 Noon 104 121 110 156 147 148 116 127 106 107 99 124 118 119 114 128 111 119 121 124

Sessions Convened at 12 Noon 9 1 4 4 4 2 6 4 6 6 4 3 1 15 14 5 19 17 7 7

Sessions Convened after 12 Noon 21 36 24 32 33 41 36 39 40 39 33 39 45 55 61 54 59 52 51 48

Sessions Continued after 6 p.m. 129 120 129 144 110 152 116 120 101 111 101 122 91 114 115 104 102 109 98 92

Sessions Continued after 12 Midnight 3 3 4 4 2 2 1 1 3 7 1 2 2 10 5 0 5 7 5 2

Saturday Sessions 2 2 2 1 3 5 2 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 3 1 4 4 1 1

Sunday Sessions 1 2 0 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 4 3 1 0

Prepared by the Senate Daily Digest - Office of the Secretary - 01/11/24

20-YEAR COMPARISON OF SENATE LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY
___________

No. 95-4064

___________

Pierre L. Weaver, *

 *

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

Gary Grimes; Jodie Lemora, *

 *

Defendants-Appellees, *

---------------- *

 *

Pierre L. Weaver, *

 *

Plaintiff-Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

v. * Western District of Arkansas.

 *

Jim Rush, Jail Administrator; *

Robert Hammond, Deputy Jail * [UNPUBLISHED]

Administrator; Deputy Sampson, *

 *

Defendants-Appellees, *

---------------- *

 *

Pierre L. Weaver, *

 *

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

Gary Grimes, Sheriff of *

Sebastian County; Jim Rush, Jail *

Administrator; Jodie Lemora, *

Nurse; Robert Hammond, *

 *

Defendants-Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 5, 1997

 Filed: February 12, 1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
 The Honorable Beverly R. Stites, United States Magistrate 1

Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was

referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pierre L. Weaver, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from an adverse

judgment entered by the district court on a jury verdict in these 1

consolidated actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On appeal, Weaver has

neither identified any basis of alleged error by the district

court, nor provided a trial transcript or requested one at

government expense. As we thus cannot review the jury's verdict,

we dismiss Weaver's appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2)

(appellant urging finding or conclusion is unsupported by, or

contrary to, the evidence shall include in record transcript of all

such relevant evidence); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a) (appellant must

identify issues on appeal); Carter v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 87 F.3d

1025, 1026 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (dismissing pro se

litigant's appeal because brief presented no question for appellate

court to decide, because, inter alia, it did not identify any basis

of alleged error by district court); cf. Branch v. Martin, 886 F.2d

1043, 1046 n.2 (8th Cir. 1989) (failure of pro se appellant to

provide transcript precludes meaningful review and ordinarily will

result in appeal's dismissal). 

A true copy.
Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
v150341_10-46 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.46