alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph E. Smith, Relator, *v.*Frederick W. Wurster, Commissioner of the Fire Department of the City of Brooklyn, Respondent.

*Certiorari*— what *papers will he considered by the court ■*— denial *of a conclusion of law.*

In determining the question as to whether a person should he held to he a member of the force for extinguishing fires in the city of Brooklyn, upon the return to a writ' of certiorari to review the proceedings of the fire commissioner of said city in discharging such person, the court will consider the petition for the writ and the affidavits annexed thereto as well as the return. The denial of a conclusion of law in the return is a futile method erf defeating the relator.

Oeetioeaei issued out of the Supreme Court, and attested the 19th day of March, 1894, directed to Frederick W. Wurster, commissioner of the fire department of the city of Brooklyn, commanding him to certify and return to the office of the clerk of the county of Kings all matters in reference to the appointment or appointments of Joseph E. Smith as a member of the fire department of the city of Brooklyn and all proceedings and testimony had and taken touching the removal of said Joseph E. Smith from membership in said department, and also to return a' .full answer to the allegations con-' tained in the petition of the said Joseph E. Smith.

*Edward F. O'Dwyer,*for the relator.

*Albert G. McDonald*and *H. O. Wood,*for the respondent.

Pratt, J.:

Considering all the circumstances I think plaintiff should be held to be a member of the force for extinguishing fires.

To determine the question the court will consider the petition for the writ and affidavits annexed thereto as well as the return. The denial of a conclusion of law in the return is a futile method of defeating the relator. The latter was certainly not employed as a laborer, but as a necessary member of the fire force. It is clear he was originally appointed on the force where he served for nearly ten years after having qualified regularly. It is too late, and too *8transparent a fiction to succeed, to claim the relator is not on the force.

The judgment should be for relator.

BeowN, P. J., and DyiíMAN, J., concurred.

Determination annulled and relator restored to his position, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.
|                                                                                             |        |                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| Name of Subsidiary                                                                          |   | State of Incorporation |
| First Professionals Insurance Company, Inc. (“First Professionals”)             |   | Florida                |
| Anesthesiologists Professional Assurance Company                                            |   | Florida                |
| FPIC Insurance Agency, Inc.                                                            |   | Florida                |
| The Tenere Group, Inc. (“Tenere”) (100% owned by First Professionals)           |   | Missouri               |
| Intermed Insurance Company (“Intermed”) (100% owned by Tenere)             |   | Missouri               |
| Trout Insurance Services, Inc. (100% owned by Intermed)                                     |   | Missouri               |
| Insurance Services, Inc. (100% owned by Intermed)                                           |   | Missouri               |
| Advocate, MD Financial Group Inc. ("Advocate, MD") (100% owned by First Professionals) |   | Nevada                 |
| Advocate, MD Insurance of the Southwest Inc. (100% owned by Advocate, MD)              |   | Texas                  |
| Advocate Insurance Services, Inc. (100% owned by Advocate, MD)                         |   | Texas                  |
# States in the Senate | Georgia Senators

**

----

**Introduction****Senators****Timeline**

 1. Elected Nov. 7, 1818. Served in House during interim.

 2. Vacancy from February 18, 1819, to November 5, 1819, because of failure of legislature to elect.

 3. Berrien resigned the seat in May 1845 to accept a seat on Georgia's state supreme court. Seat vacant from his resignation until November 14, 1845, when he was elected to fill the vacancy he had created for the term ending Mar. 3, 1847. Vacancy again from Mar. 4 to Nov. 13, 1847 because of failure of legislature to elect. The state legislature re-elected Berrien to the seat, where he served until his resignation on May 28, 1852.

 4. Withdrew from the Senate Feb. 4, 1861. Seat declared vacant Mar. 14, 1861. Because of Civil War, vacancy from Feb. 4, 1861, to February 23, 1871.

 5. Miller was originally elected on July 28, 1868. His credentials were challenged, however, and he was not seated until Feb. 24, 1871. 

 6. Vacancy from Mar. 4 to Nov. 13, 1871. Foster Blodgett presented credentials for the same seat, but was not permitted to qualify, and on December 19, 1871, was adjudged not elected in accordance with the Constitution.

 7. Twice during Bacon’s Senate service (1907 and 1913), he was appointed by the governor for the interim between Mar. 4 (when his term ended) and June, when the state legislature was scheduled to meet again, and could elect him.

 8. Elected Nov. 7, 1972, to fill vacancy in term ending Jan. 3, 1973, and also to full term ending Jan. 3, 1979.

 9. Elected in a run-off election held Jan. 5, 2021, and qualified and was seated Jan. 20, 2021. Vacancy from Jan. 3 to Jan. 19, 2021.

 10. Withdrew from Senate Jan. 28, 1861. Because of Civil War, vacancy from Jan 28, 1861, to January 31, 1871.

 11. Elected July 28, 1868, to fill vacancy in term beginning Mar. 4, 1867. Georgia was readmitted to representation July 15, 1870. Hill's credentials were challenged, and he was finally seated on Feb. 1, 1871.

 12. Tendered resignation May 14, 1880, and retired from the Senate May 26, 1880.

 13. Elected on July 12, 1911 but remained as governor of Georgia, not taking his seat in the Senate until November 16, 1911.

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 14-1630

___________________________ Leon Jackson Rice, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Greg Blankenship, Officer, North Little Rock Police Department; Dan Haley, Officer, North Little Rock Police Department; Anthony Neff, Sergeant, North Little Rock Police Department; Robert Gr iffin, Sgt., North Little Rock Police Department; Danny E. Bradley, Chief of Police, North Little Rock Police Department; J. Kovach, Lt., North Little Rock Police Department; Scott Duncan; Natalie Dickson, Public Defender, Pulaski County lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________ Submitted: January 26, 2015 Filed: January 29, 2015 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Inmate Leon Jackson Rice, Jr. appeals the district courts 1 adverse entry of judgment following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful consideration of the issues Rice raises on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
# Democratic Policy Committee Chairpersons

**

----

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Related Link 

About Parties and Leadership

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's balance sheet, statement of operations, statement of stockholders'
equity and statement of cash flows and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000743884
<NAME>                        MacroChem Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        $6,292,321
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              6,468,151
<PP&E>                        842,484
<DEPRECIATION>                555,023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                7,014,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         377,184
<BONDS>                       4,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      163,384
<OTHER-SE>                    6,469,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  7,014,427
<SALES>                       650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              50,650
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            5,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,835,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  $(2,835,293)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 $(.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 $(.18)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated  Balance Sheet at September  30, 1999 and the related  Statement of
Consolidated  Operations  for the nine months  ended  September  30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               198,038
<SECURITIES>                                          72,319
<RECEIVABLES>                                         46,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                           77,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     422,757
<PP&E>                                             2,680,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (1,552,754)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,630,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                169,559
<BONDS>                                              256,851
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             253,259
<OTHER-SE>                                           505,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,630,452
<SALES>                                              507,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     553,922
<CGS>                                                449,688 <F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        482,347 <F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      47,074 <F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    13,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       10,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                          11,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             914
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.00

<FN>
<F1> Includes  Production  costs and  Depreciation,  depletion and  amortization
     from the Statement of Consolidated Operations.
<F2> Includes  Production  costs,  Depreciation,  depletion and amortization and
     Administrative  and general  expense  from the  Statement  of  Consolidated
     Operations.
<F3> Includes  Exploration  expense,  Write-downs  and  other  unusual  charges,
     Business  combination  and  integration  costs and Other  expense  from the
     Statement of Consolidated Operations.



</FN>




</TABLE>
No. 1,757.

#### HEINZE et al., Appellants, *v.*BOSTON & MONTANA CON. COPPER & SILVER MINING CO., Respondent.

*Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County>; Vttiliam Clancy, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided January 16, 1904.

*Mr. J. M. Denny,*and *Mr. Jolv¡% J.*McHatton, for Appellants.

*Mr. C. F.*Kelley, and *Messrs. Forbis &*Evans, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss tbis appeal is Hereby sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Order entered October 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00612-CV

RICHARD DEAGUERO, Appellant

V.

VINCE FUDZIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND TMV, LLC D/B/A TRIUNE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-11305

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated August 13, 2015, we 

notified the district clerk that the clerk’s record was overdue. We directed the district clerk to 

file the clerk’s record within thirty days. No response or request for an extension has been 

received from the clerk. 

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s 

record within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send 

a copy of this order to Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre by electronic transmission.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41834

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER JOHN BERNAL

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-720-2

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Christopher John Bernal has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Bernal has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. Section 1350

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert B. Wagner, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   | /s/ Robert B. Wagner    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert B. Wagner        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | May 25, 2007            |

 

----
NO. 07-07-0387-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

SEPTEMBER 25, 2007

______________________________

ANNMARIE ADKINS, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 108 DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; TH

NO. 51,543-E; HON. RICHARD DAMBOLD, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Abatement and Remand

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Annmarie Adkins (appellant), acting pro se, perfected appeal from her conviction

for engaging in organized criminal activity. In response to notice from this court that no

docketing statement had been filed, appellant advised the court that she desired to

prosecute her appeal but requested “some assistance” to do so. Furthermore, appellant
2

advised that she had been unable to contact trial counsel in assisting her with the appeal.

The record has not been filed, and is not due until on or about November 5, 2007.

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 108 District th

Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing

to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to continue to prosecute this appeal; 

2. whether retained trial counsel, Eric Coats, will continue to represent

appellant on appeal; and, 

3. if not, whether appellant is indigent and entitled to the appointment of

counsel and the preparation of a free clerk’s record and court reporter’s

record.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that

appellant is entitled to appointed counsel and does not have counsel, the trial court shall

appoint counsel to prosecute this appeal. The trial court shall also execute findings of fact

and conclusions of law addressing the aforementioned issues, and cause same to be

included in a supplemental clerk’s record. Also to be included in the findings is the name,

address, state bar number, telephone and telefax number of appellant’s counsel, should

one be appointed by the trial court. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk’s

record and the transcription of the hearing with the Clerk of this Court on or before October

25, 2007. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the district court may

request same on or before October 25, 2007. 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GST USA'S
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      42,721,000
<SECURITIES>                                    46,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               79,591,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (7,542,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           143,206,000
<PP&E>                                     944,410,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (112,363,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,062,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      473,050,000
<BONDS>                                        895,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                               (401,826,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,062,520
<SALES>                                    321,922,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           321,922,000
<CGS>                                      207,185,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              417,213,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (33,659,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          88,821,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (150,453,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (150,453,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (150,453,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# Sunday Sessions of the Senate (1861-Present)

**

----

 

 * Sine die adjournment

Information provided by the Office of the      Secretary of the Senate.    

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Related Links 

Saturday Sessions

Dates of Sessions of Congress
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2297

To reauthorize the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 27, 2000

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, and Mr.

BAUCUS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To reauthorize the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE WATER RE4 SOURCES RESEARCH ACT OF 1984.

5 Section 104 of the Water Resources Research Act of

6 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303) is amended—

7 (1) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ‘‘the Sec8 retary’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘the Sec9 retary $9,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, $10,000,000

10 for each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and
2

•S 2297 IS

1 $12,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 and 2005,

2 to remain available until expended.’’; and

3 (2) in the first sentence of subsection (g)(1), by

4 striking ‘‘the Secretary of the Interior’’ and all that

5 follows through ‘‘2000’’ and inserting ‘‘the Secretary

6 $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, $4,000,000 for

7 each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and $6,000,000

8 for each of fiscal years 2004 and 2005, to be avail9 able’’.

Æ