alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8041

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

LEMONZE E. FORD, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(7:03-cr-01094-HFF-14; 7:06-cv-02148-HFF) 

Submitted: December 1, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. 

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lemonze E. Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Lemonze E. Ford seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2000 & Supp. 2008) 

motion. For the reasons that follow, we remand to the district 

court. 

In civil cases in which the United States or its 

officer or agency is a party, parties have sixty days after the 

entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an 

appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). A district court may 

extend the time to appeal upon a motion filed within thirty days 

after expiration of the prescribed time and a showing of 

excusable neglect or good cause. This appeal period is 

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of 

Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. 

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was filed and entered on 

its docket on July 10, 2008. The district court received Ford’s 

notice of appeal on September 22, 2008, which was after the 

sixty-day appeal period expired but before the expiration of the 

thirty-day excusable neglect period. In his notice of appeal, 

Ford stated that he received the July 10 order “several weeks 

late,” and he requests permission to file a “timely notice” of 

appeal. We liberally construe Ford’s pro se filing as a motion 

for an extension of time to file his appeal. 

2 
3 

Because the notice of appeal was filed within the 

excusable neglect period and because the district court has not 

ruled on the motion for extension, we remand this case to the 

district court for the limited purpose of enabling the district 

court to determine whether Ford has shown excusable neglect or 

good cause warranting an extension of the sixty-day appeal 

period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to 

this court for further consideration. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2375
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         20
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4241
<PP&E>                                             449
<DEPRECIATION>                                     410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        114
<COMMON>                                         11768
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4774
<SALES>                                           5134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5134
<CGS>                                             3544
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (24)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.84)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

h1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145665

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145665

COA: 306906

Oakland CC: 2007-216394-FC

KEVIN DARNELL RAGLAND,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 21, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2318

To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate good time credits for

prisoners serving a sentence for a crime of violence, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 29, 2000

Mr. DORGAN (for himself, Mr. CRAIG, and Mr. ROBB) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate good

time credits for prisoners serving a sentence for a crime

of violence, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘100 Percent Truth5 in-Sentencing Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CREDIT TOWARD SERVICE OF

7 SENTENCE FOR SATISFACTORY BEHAVIOR.

8 Section 3624(b)(1) of title 18, United States Code,

9 is amended—
2

•S 2318 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(1) Subject to paragraph (2),’’

2 and inserting the following:

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—

4 ‘‘(A) GENERAL RULE.—Subject to para5 graph (2) and to subparagraph (B) of this

6 paragraph,’’;

7 (2) by striking the second sentence; and

8 (3) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(B) CRIMES OF VIOLENCE.—A prisoner

10 who is serving a term of imprisonment of more

11 than 1 year for a crime of violence shall not be

12 eligible for credit toward the service of the pris13 oner’s sentence under subparagraph (A).’’.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00264-CV

Davario Pegram, Appellant

v.

Britney Johnson, Appellee

FROM THE 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY 

NO. 22-1657-F425, THE HONORABLE BETSY F. LAMBETH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on May 31, 2023. 

On June 6, 2023, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to his failure to 

pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice 

requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report 

regarding this appeal by June 16, 2023. Further, the notice advised appellant that his failure to 

comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To 

date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the 

clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to 

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court 
2

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without 

payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established that he is

entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because appellant has 

failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, we 

dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 11, 2023
II

Calendar No. 431

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2036

To make permanent the moratorium on the imposition of taxes on the

Internet.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 7, 2000

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire introduced the following bill; which was read

the first time

FEBRUARY 8, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To make permanent the moratorium on the imposition of

taxes on the Internet.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON IMPOSITION OF

4 TAXES ON THE INTERNET.

5 Section 1101(a) of the Omnibus Consolidated and

6 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999 is

7 amended by striking ‘‘during the period beginning on Oc-
2

S 2036 PCS

1 tober 1, 1998, and ending 3 years after the date of the

2 enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘after September 30,

3 1998’’.

Calendar No. 431

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2036

A BILL

To make permanent the moratorium on the

imposition of taxes on the Internet.

FEBRUARY 8, 2000

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62518

- ADR

)

Under Contract No. DE

- AM36

- 09GO29040

T.O. N39430

- 16

- F

- 1803 )

)

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : William J. Spriggs, Esq.

Spriggs Law Group

Sumerduck, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Cindy Hurt, Esq.

Susannah M. Mitchell, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 6, 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62518

- ADR

, Appeal of Constellation

NewEnergy, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 6, 2023 MICHAEL N. O’CONNELL

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) I, William E. Beifuss, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18USC §§.1350, as adopted pursuant to §§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)


of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material


respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: June 6, 2011By: \s\William E. BeifussWilliam E. Beifuss, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Sarah A. Otis, Deceased. Charles M. Otis, Appellant; Oliver B. Cadwell and Others, Respondents.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and dishursements, and motion granted.

All concurred.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1875

To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to remove the prohibition

on the use of funds to pay for newspaper or periodical advertising

space or radio time.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 5, 1999

Mr. COCHRAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to remove

the prohibition on the use of funds to pay for newspaper

or periodical advertising space or radio time.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1875 IS

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF AGRI2 CULTURAL MARKETING FUNDS TO PAY FOR

3 NEWSPAPER OR PERIODICAL ADVERTISING

4 SPACE OR RADIO TIME.

5 Section 203(f) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of

6 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1622(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘: Pro7 vided,’’ and all that follows through ‘‘203(e)’’.

Æ
# Saturday Sessions of the Senate (1968-Present)

**

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2330 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2330

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communication services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 30, 2000

    Mr. Roth (for himself, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Robb, Mr. 
 Nickles, and Mr. Mack) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communication services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 
              SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 33 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to facilities and services) is amended by striking subchapter 
B.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 4293 of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 
        4121) and subchapter B of chapter 33,'' and inserting ``and 
        chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 
        4121),''.
            (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``section 4251 or''.
            (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (i) by striking ``imposed by--'' and all that 
                follows through ``with respect to'' and inserting 
                ``imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect to'', 
                and
                    (ii) by striking ``bills rendered or''.
            (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e) of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``Communications Services and''.
            (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``4251, 4261, or 4271'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``4261 or 4271''.
            (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such Code is 
        amended by inserting ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B), by 
        striking subparagraph (C), and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (D) as subparagraph (C).
            (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of such Code is 
        amended by striking the item relating to subchapter B.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills first rendered more than 90 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0000743239
<NAME>                    GLEASON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>              1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                            5394
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                    67802
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                      30035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                113994
<PP&E>                          167568
<DEPRECIATION>                  109215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  189865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            55021
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                          5797
<OTHER-SE>                       81673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    189865
<SALES>                          60335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 60335
<CGS>                            41016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    41016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 11297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (1)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   8023
<INCOME-TAX>                      2829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               5194
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                      5194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                     1.01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Advanced Radio Telecom Corp. on Form S-8 (File No.333-21875) of our report dated
March 10, 1998 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Advanced Radio Telecom Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                 Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Seattle, Washington
March 30, 1998
# Robert C. Byrd: A Featured Biography

**

----

The longest serving senator in history, Robert C. Byrd gained his higher education in the United States Senate. Rising from an impoverished childhood in the coalfields of West Virginia, Byrd entered public office in 1947 without a college degree. As a senator he earned a law degree by attending classes in the evenings, and he never stopped studying. His careful reading of the Senate’s rules, precedents, and history made him a formidable opponent in debate and fueled his rise through party leadership to become Democratic Conference secretary (1967-1971), whip (1971-1977), and leader (1977-1989). He delivered more than 100 addresses on the history of the Senate, which were collected and published for the Senate’s bicentennial in 1989. On September 15, 1998, Senator Byrd delivered a “Leader’s Lecture” to his colleagues in the Old Senate Chamber. Senator Byrd died on June 28, 2010, having served for 51 years, 5 months, and 26 days.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 30, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00764

- CR

Dorothy MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2599

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. T he

Appellant ’ s brief is due on February 27, 2014.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of January, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.02

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Plans Administration Committee
Citigroup Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-25605 and No. 333-78039 on Form S-8 of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. of
our report dated June 23, 1999 relating to the statements of net assets
available for plan benefits of the Travelers Group 401(k) Savings Plan as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related statements of changes in net assets
available for plan benefits, for the years then ended, and the supplemental
schedules of assets held for investment purposes at December 31, 1998 and
schedule of reportable transactions for the year ended December 31, 1998, which
report appears in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report on  Form-10-K/A-1 of
Travelers Property Casualty Corp.


                                   /s/ KPMG LLP



New York, New York
June 28, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.2


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, I, the
undersigned  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of The Chalone Wine Group,
Ltd. (the  "Company"),  hereby certify that to my knowledge the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter  ended June 30, 2004 (the  "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.  This  written  statement  is being  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed  original of this
statement  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.


By: /s/ THOMAS B. SELFRIDGE
    _______________________
        Thomas B. Selfridge

August 16, 2004