alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                9
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         12,866
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        204,668
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               22,241
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    46,169
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         12,609
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           12,609
<LOANS>                                       184,869
<ALLOWANCE>                                     2,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                286,293
<DEPOSITS>                                    252,419
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             2,208
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        8,347
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                286,293
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 4,459
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 880
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    7
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                5,576
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              2,254
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,268
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           3,308
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      52
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 96
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 2,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,652
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      1,652
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   8.39
<LOANS-NON>                                     1,214
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,561
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 2,586
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                1,991
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      39
<RECOVERIES>                                        5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,010
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            2,010
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION**





Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) I, Harinder Dhillon,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18USC
      ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
                May 13, 2008By:
                \s\*Harinder Dhillon*Harinder
                Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal
                Executive Officer)








This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert B. Wagner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Robert B. Wagner    | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| |                         | 
| | Robert B. Wagner        | 
| | Chief Financial Officer | 
| | August 22, 2005         |
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JK / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T NI S ARMOHA MM AD , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 72220 A ge nc yN o. A 093- 057- 269 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. N i s arM oha m m a d, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of P aki s t an, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED MA R 24 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ K / Res ea r ch 07- 72220 2 ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 8 8 9 , 8 9 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g M o h am m a d ’s m o tio n to re op en as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov ertw o years af t erthe B IA ’ s f

i nal d e c is io n , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and M oh am m ad fa i l ed t o est abl i sh changed c i r c u ms t an c e s i n Pak i s t an t o qu a l i f yf o rth e r e g u l a t o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me lim ita tio n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; se e al so T ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 538 F . 3d 98 8, 99 6-97 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( un derl yi ng advers e c re di bi l i ty det erm i nat i on re nd er ed e v id e n c e o f

c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s im m a te r ia l) . M oh am m ad’ s c on t ent i on thatthe B IA fa i l ed t o con si der the evi dence s ubm i tt e d w i th the m ot i on t o r e ope n f a i l s , be c aus e he ha s notove r c om e the p r e s u m p tio n th a t th e B I A d idr e v ie w th e r e c o r d . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 439 F .3 d5 9 2 , 6 0 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . M o h am m a d ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A f a ile dto e xpl a i n i t s r e a s ons f

ori t s de c i s i on t o de nythe m ot i on t o r e ope n i s be l i e d bythe r e c o r d . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
**Exhibit31.2**

**PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert B.Wagner, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of XETA Technologies, Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.               Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)              all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Dated: August 29, 2006   |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     |
| /s/ Robert B.  Wagner    |   |
| Robert B. Wagner         |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      325
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   552
<PP&E>                                           4,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              406
<BONDS>                                          1,452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,545
<SALES>                                            521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   521
<CGS>                                              361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     29
<INCOME-TAX>                                        12
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 17
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00312-CR

IN RE IAN SORRELL KURIGER

Original Proceeding

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 33292CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s “Application for Writ of Mandamus,” filed on October 13, 2023, is 

denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, 

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith 

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed October 26, 2023

Do not publish 

[OT06]
[File No. 6838.]

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF MARTIN HATLIE FROM A DECISION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN AND FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA.

(4 NW(2d) 199.)

Opinion filed May 26, 1942.

*Vernon D. Forbes,*State’s Attorney, and *Patríele T.*Milloy, Assistant State’s Attorney, for appellants,

*Max W. Lauder,*for respondent.

Morris, J.

The issues in this case are identical with those involved in the case of Re Peschel froni a Decision of the Board of County Commissioners in and for Richland County, North Dakota, decided in'this term. Ante, 4 NW 2d 194. This case is therefore controlled by that decision and for reasons set forth in the opinion therein the judgment of the district court herein is affirmed.

Burke, Nuessle, and Christianson, JJ., concur.

Burr, Ch.' J.

(dissenting). I dissent on grounds stated in the Peschel Case.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DURAN THOMAS,

Petitioner

v.

HEMLOCK TOWNSHIP, HEMLOCK 

TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

SCOTT TOWNSHIP, AND SCOTT 

TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 656 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2053

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide marriage tax

penalty relief for earned income credit.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 2000

Mr. JEFFORDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

marriage tax penalty relief for earned income credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARRIAGE TAX PENALTY RELIEF FOR EARNED

4 INCOME CREDIT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 32(b) of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to percent7 ages and amounts) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘AMOUNTS.—The earned’’ and

9 inserting ‘‘AMOUNTS.—
2

•S 2053 IS

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subpara2 graph (B), the earned’’, and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph:

5 ‘‘(B) JOINT RETURNS.—In the case of a

6 joint return, the phaseout amount determined

7 under subparagraph (A) shall be increased by

8 $3,500.’’.

9 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (1)(B) of

10 section 32(j) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat11 ing to inflation adjustments) is amended to read as fol12 lows:

13 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter14 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar

15 year in which the taxable year begins,

16 determined—

17 ‘‘(i) in the case of amounts in sub18 sections (b)(1)(A) and (i)(1), by sub19 stituting ‘calendar year 1995’ for ‘calendar

20 year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof,

21 and

22 ‘‘(ii) in the case of the $3,500 amount

23 in subsection (b)(1)(B), by substituting

24 ‘calendar year 2000’ for ‘calendar year
3

•S 2053 IS

1 1992’ in subparagraph (B) of such section

2 1.’’.

3 (c) ROUNDING.—Section 32(j)(2)(A) of the Internal

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to rounding) is amended

5 by striking ‘‘subsection (b)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection

6 (b)(2)(A) (after being increased under subparagraph (B)

7 thereof)’’.

8 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

10 December 31, 2000.

Æ
#### U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v Citizens National Bank of Monticello.

(Decided May 18, 1911.)

Appeal from Wayne Circuit Court.

When a supersedeas ¡bond is executed and no supersedeas is then issued, it is the duty of the clerk thereafter to issue it, and damages will he awarded though no supersedeas was issued until another appeal was granted, the ¡first appeal not having been dismissed,

O. H. WADDLE & SON and BBA-HRISON & HSA'RIR'ISO'N for appellant.

W1M. MARSHALL BULLITT ¡and KEITH L. BULLITT for ap-pellee.

Opinion op the Couht by

Chire Justice Hobson

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal With Damages.

On May 20th, 1910, appellee recovered judgment against appellant in the Wayne Circuit Court for $15,-000.00. On July 20th, 1910, appellant executed a superse-deas bond but the clerk then issued no supersedeas. The time for filing the record in this court expired December 13,1910, and! the record was not filed and'the time was not extended. On February 11,1911, appellant had an appeal granted by this Court but obtained no supersedeas. On April 18, 1911, the Clerk of the Wayne Circuit Court issued a supersedeas, on appellee's counsel-calling his attention to the fact that he had not issued it and it was its duty to issue it then. On April 21st, appellant obtained a supersedeas from the Clerk of this court. Appellee has entered a motion to dismiss Ithe appeal granted by the ’Circuit Court with damages.

The case of L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Lucas, 120 Ky., 359, controls. That ease is similar to this except that 'there the second appeal was taken after the supersedeas was is*700sued by the Circuit Clerk. But that circumstance is not material. The appeal was still pending and the Clerk was authorized to issue the supersedeas as no superse-deas had been obtained from the Clerk of this Court. It is 'true appellant had abandoned that appeal but it bad ■not been dismissed. Appellee was not entitled to execution on the judgment after the supersedeas issued.

'Motion sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2245 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2245

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to modify 
  the article description with respect to certain hand-woven fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2000

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to modify 
  the article description with respect to certain hand-woven fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN HAND-WOVEN FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subheadings 5111.11.30 and 5111.19.20 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States are amended by striking 
``, with a loom width of less than 76 cm'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``yarns of different colors''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 30th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MURRAY 
INCOME PROPERTIES I, LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE BALANCE SHEET AND
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,693,329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  761,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,905
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,447,838
<PP&E>                                      26,632,706
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,825,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,444,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,968
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,826,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,444,255
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               852,947
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  409,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (72)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                304,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            304,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   304,065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.56
        

</TABLE>
# Senate Sessions while Presidents Lay in State

**

----

*Senate Historical Office*

                December 2018            

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Senate Historical Office 

Information provided by the Senate Historical Office.

Questions about Senate History?Email a Senate historian.

### Related Links 

Those Who Have Lain in State or in Honor in the U.S. Capitol (aoc.gov)

Dates of Sessions of Congress