alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RESOLUTIONS APPROVED ON JUNE 13 AND 25, 2008, BY THE BOARD OF 

REGENTS

On June 9, 2008, the members of the Board of Regents received three proposed motions for their 

consideration. The following motions were approved by fax and e-mail ballot on June 13, 2008: 

VOTED that the Board of Regents recognizes the generosity of Roger W. and Victoria P. 

Sant, through The Roger W. and Victoria P. Sant Founder’s Fund of the Summit Fund of 

Washington, to the Smithsonian and the National Museum of Natural History, and creates 

an endowment to support the National Museum of Natural History’s Ocean Hall 

exhibition and related education and outreach programs. In addition, the Board of 

Regents names the Museum’s new exhibition hall The Sant Ocean Hall. The hall will 

bear this name until the next comprehensive renovation of the space or for a period of 25 

years, whichever is longer. [2008.06.1] 

VOTED the Board of Regents expresses its profound appreciation to the memory of 

Anne d’Harnoncourt, an esteemed colleague and true friend of the Smithsonian 

Institution, and extends its heartfelt sympathies to her husband, Joseph J. Rishel, and 

extended family. [2008.06.2] 

VOTED that the Board of Regents endorses the creation of the Cristián Samper 

Outstanding Fellow at the Smithsonian Institution in recognition of Dr. Samper’s 

contributions to scholarship at the Smithsonian and the esteem in which he is held by the 

Smithsonian community. [2008.06.3] 

In addition, draft minutes of the May 5, 2008, meeting of the Board of Regents were forwarded 

to members of the Board of Regents on June 18, 2008. The following motion was approved by 

fax and e-mail ballot on June 25, 2008: 

VOTED that the Board of Regents approves the Minutes of the Meeting of 

May 5, 2008, as previously circulated on June 18, 2008. [2008.06.4]
Exhibit 10.1
 2009 Board Compensation Election Form
(Revised May 2009)
 
 Name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
 Annual Retainer for all Directors
 2009
 o
    
    Cash Only ($60,000);o
    
    Stock Only  such number of shares of common stock of the Company equal in aggregate value to
$75,000, valued at the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the day on which such
board compensation is payable; oro
    
    $20,000 cash plus such number of shares of common stock of the Company equal in aggregate value
to $55,000, valued at the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the day on which such
board compensation is payable.
 Additional Retainer for Chairman of the Board
 2009
 o
    
    Cash Only ($50,000); oro
    
    Such number of shares of common stock of the Company equal in aggregate value to $62,500, valued
at the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the day on which the board compensation
is payable.
 Additional Retainer for Chairperson of Audit and Finance Committee
 2009
 o
    
    Cash Only ($15,000); oro
    
    Such number of shares of common stock of the Company equal in aggregate value to $18,750, valued
at the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the day on which the board compensation
is payable.
 Additional Retainer for Chairperson of Compensation Committee
 2009
 o
    
    Cash Only ($7,500); oro
    
    Such number of shares of common stock of the Company equal in aggregate value to $9,375, valued
at the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the day on which the board compensation
is payable.
 Additional Retainer for Chairperson of Governance Committee
 2009
 o
    
    Cash Only ($5,000); oro
    
    Such number of shares of common stock of the Company equal in aggregate value to $6,250, valued
at the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the day on which the board compensation
is payable.
 Page 1 of 2




---



##### 



INSTRUCTIONS FOR DELIVERY OF SHARES (if electing to receive shares)
  
 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:Signature of Participant
    

Date
 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,105
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,391
<PP&E>                                         121,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                (38,586)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,142
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                     50,846
<COMMON>                                             0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                    (97,250)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,693
<SALES>                                         54,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,852
<CGS>                                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,622)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,622)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,622)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (1,030.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Balance
Sheet or Statement of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alfa Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                |  |        |  |                        
|--------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date:    8/4/04 |  |        |  | /S/ Jerry A. Newby     
|                |  | Name:  |  | Jerry A. Newby         
|                |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERRY CHARLIE SALTZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-64-P, CA-95-430-3-P)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Charlie Saltz, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant

failed to provide a transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing.

See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1025 (1992). Moreover, Appellant

has failed to state a substantial claim justifying preparation of

a transcript at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). Consequently, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 1,566.

#### NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent, *v.*NEFF, Appellant.

*Appeal from District*Court, *Deer Lodge County.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided January 16, 1902.

*553
      *Mr. Bernard*Noon, for Appellant.

*Mr. William Wallace, Jr.,*for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

— Upon motion of the respondent, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with, the stipulation on file, each party paying iis or its own costs.
# Daniel Webster: A Featured Biography

**

----

One of the nation's greatest orators, Daniel Webster (1782–1852) lent his eloquence to the cause of national unity during the tumultuous years leading to the Civil War. Webster was born in Salisbury, New Hampshire, and gained national prominence as an attorney while serving five terms in the U.S. House of Representatives. After moving to Boston in 1816, he successfully argued several notable cases before the Supreme Court of the United States that helped define the constitutional power of the federal government. Elected to the U.S. Senate in 1827, Webster established his oratorical reputation in the famous  1830 debate with South Carolina senator Robert Hayne over the issue of states' rights and nullification, declaring, "Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!" From 1841 to 1843, Webster served a distinguished term as secretary of state before returning to the Senate in 1845. Five years later he endorsed the controversial legislative Compromise of 1850, elements of which his constituents strongly opposed. On July 22, 1850, Webster resigned his Senate seat and accepted appointment as secretary of state. He died two years later at his home in Marshfield, Massachusetts.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.

### Related Art 

Daniel Webster
2 

JOHN ADAMS 

President John Adams vetoed no bills during his administration (Fifth Congress, first session to Sixth 

Congress, second session).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION FROM THE FORM 10-Q OF
HOWELL CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            4110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    77178
<ALLOWANCES>                                       251
<INVENTORY>                                       5476
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 88463
<PP&E>                                          408961
<DEPRECIATION>                                  218719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  280649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            93606
<BONDS>                                          83805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        690
<COMMON>                                          4940
<OTHER-SE>                                       75490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    280649
<SALES>                                         554958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                554958
<CGS>                                           533731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   533731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7049
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2615
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued December 16, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00765-CV

———————————

IN RE SUNBELT RENTALS, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, 

challenging the trial court’s orders requiring relator to respond to discovery 

requests and ordering the deposition of relator’s claims and insurance manager.

1

Real party in interest, Julie Rogers as next friend for Dalton Rogers, a minor, has 

 

1

The underlying case is Julie Rogers, as Next Friend of Dalton Rogers, a Minor v. Sunbelt 

Rentals, Inc. and Cody Fox, Individually, Cause No. 2013-65334, in the 151st District 

Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Engelhart presiding.
2

filed a motion to dismiss the petition as moot. On November 17, 2014, the trial 

court signed an order vacating the orders underlying this mandamus proceeding. 

Accordingly, the petition is moot. See In re Becker, No. 01-10-00917-CV, 2011 

WL 1588520, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 21, 2011, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing In re Campbell, 106 S.W.3d 788, 788 (Tex. App.—

Texarkana 2003, orig. proceeding)).

We grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the petition for writ of 

mandamus as moot. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. Finally, we 

vacate our stay order, issued on September 16, 2014. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Massengale.
#### Carl Schefer and Others, Copartners, under the Firm Name of Schefer, Schramm & Vogel, Respondents, v. Andrew B. Carton and Lawrence A. Carton, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from GST USA's
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
             
<S>                                          <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1997
 <PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
 <CASH>                                                      54,656,905
 <SECURITIES>                                                53,286,773
 <RECEIVABLES>                                               19,683,095
 <ALLOWANCES>                                                (3,450,694)
 <INVENTORY>                                                  2,789,519
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           138,029,475
 <PP&E>                                                     379,502,108
 <DEPRECIATION>                                              19,526,396
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             681,660,148
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      151,692,796
 <BONDS>                                                    468,280,231
 <COMMON>                                                    78,372,605
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
 <PREFERRED>                                                          0
 <OTHER-SE>                                                (161,448,959)
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               681,660,148
 <SALES>                                                     66,547,986
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            66,547,986
 <CGS>                                                       50,886,542
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                              138,082,543
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           (13,116,128)
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          33,848,640
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (92,267,069)
 <INCOME-TAX>                                                   902,392
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (93,169,461)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
 <CHANGES>                                                            0
 <NET-INCOME>                                               (93,169,461)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        0
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0
         

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6430

MICHAEL JACKSON POWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EUGENE M. NUTH; JOHN R. ALLISON, Captain; WAYNE D. HARBIN; RUSSELL M. HUDSON; DONALD R. WILLIAMS; HOWARD C. HEISS, III; MISTER HOEY; MISTER FORD; JOHN DOE, Unidentified Baltimore County Police Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-05- 170-RWT) Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 26, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Jackson Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Jackson Powell seeks to appeal the district courts’ order granting Powell’s motion to reopen his twenty-eight year old action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) but staying the action pending receipt from the Baltimore County Office of Law of a status report regarding record retention and the viability of the Defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Ben eficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Powell seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Franklin Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas H. Siemers, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Thomas H. Siemers
-------------------------------------
Thomas H. Siemers
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 10, 2005


                                       18
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 97 (Thursday, May 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12109]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,773]


Clark Engineering Co., Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers 
From Kelly Services and Qualified Staffing, Owosso, MI; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on January 7, 2010, applicable to workers of Clark Engineering Co., 
Inc., including on-site leased workers of Kelly Services, Owosso, 
Michigan. The notice was published in the Federal Register February 16, 
2010 (75 FR 7036).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to the production of metal parts.
    The company reports that workers leased from Qualified Staffing 
were employed on-site at the Owosso, Michigan location of Clark 
Engineering Co., Inc. The Department has determined that these workers 
were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be 
considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Qualified Staffing working 
on-site at the Owosso, Michigan location of Clark Engineering Co., Inc.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,773 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Clark Engineering Co., Inc., including on-site 
leased workers of Kelly Services and Qualified Staffing, Owosso, 
Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after October 14, 2008, through January 7, 2012, and all 
workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on the date of certification through two years from 
the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of May, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-12109 Filed 5-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P