alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex4_6.htm


    


    TEMPORARY
WAIVER OF THE SECURITY AGREEMENT

    AND

    SECOND
AMENDMENT TO

    STOCK
PURCHASE AGREEMENT

    BETWEEN

    FLINT
TELECOM GROUP, INC. AND

    CHINA
VOICE HOLDING CORP.

    


    This
SECOND AMENDMENT dated May 1, 2009 is to temporarily waive the Security
Agreement by and between Flint and CHVC dated January 29, 2009 (the “Security
Agreement”) and certain terms and conditions to that certain Stock Purchase
Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) by and between Flint Telecom Group,
Inc. (“Flint”) and
China Voice Holding Corp., A Nevada Corporation (“CHVC”) dated January
29, 2009.

    


    Unless
otherwise indicated, terms used herein that are defined in the Agreements shall
have the same meanings herein as in the Agreements.

    


    Effective
as of May 1, 2009, the Security Agreement and the following security provision
in the Stock Purchase Agreement, as hereinafter provided, shall be temporarily
waived for so long as the two Promissory Notes issued by Flint  to Mr.
Butler and Mr. Lavery are outstanding and not repaid:

    


    Section1.02(c):
The Note “.... shall be secured
by 15,000,000 shares of CHVC common stock and the guarantee of
Purchaser.”

    


    Except as
herein modified, all the terms and conditions of the above referenced Agreement,
Schedules, Amendments and Exhibits shall remain in full force and
effect.  In the event of any conflict between the Amendment and the
Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall prevail.

    


    The
parties hereby agree that signatures transmitted and received via facsimile or
other electronic means shall be treated for all purposes of this Amendment as
original signatures and shall be deemed valid, binding and enforceable by and
against both parties.

    


    BOTH
PARTIES HERETO REPRESENT THAT THEY HAVE READ THIS AMENDMENT, UNDERSTAND IT,
AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS STATED HEREIN, AND ACKNOWLEDGE
RECEIPT OF A SIGNED, TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF THIS AMENDMENT.

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have agreed to amend the terms and conditions of this Amendment
on the day, month and year first written above.

    


    Flint
Telecom Group,
Inc.                                                                                         China Voice
Holding Corp.

    


    /s/
Vincent
Browne                                                                                             /s/ Bill
Burbank

    By:
Vincent Browne,
CEO                                                                                                
By: Bill Burbank, CEO

    


    Date:
May 1,
2009                                                                                      Date: May 1,
2009
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0959-20

CHARITY IRVIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S AND STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY

REVIEW FROM THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J.,filed a dissenting opinion in whichSLAUGHTER, J.,joined.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and sentenced to two

years in prison. In the bill of costs, the trial court assessed Appellant a $25 time payment fee.

See TEX. LOCAL GOV’T CODE § 133.103. On appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a portion

of that fee as being unconstitutional. Irvin v. State, No. 12-19-00347-CR, 2020 Tex. App.

LEXIS 7312 (Tex. App. – Tyler Sept. 9, 2020). 
IRVIN - 2

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review challenging the court’s

constitutional analysis. We recently handed down our opinion in Dulin v. State, Nos. PD0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021),

in which we held that the time payment fee was assessed prematurely because the pendency

of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court costs. As a result, there was no need to reach

the State’s constitutional arguments. 

We grant review on our own motion of the following ground:

Should the “Time Payment Fee” be struck as prematurely assessed?

Addressing that ground in light of Dulin, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals,

and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

The State’s petition is refused. Appellant’s petition is also refused.

DATE DELIVERED: MAY 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE MATTER OF:

G.H.,

DA 20-0520

A Youth in Need of Care.

ORDER

FiiLED

APR 1 3 2021'

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Coutt

State of Rilontana

This matter comes before the Court on the joint motion of Appellants (Parents) to

strike three documents appended to the Appellee's response brief that the District Court

submitted to the Clerk of this Court after Parents filed their opening brief. The three

documents are records from a prior parental rights termination proceeding in the State of

Utah. The State opposes the motion.

Parents contend that the State improperly secured transmittal of the documents,

purportedly "found loose in the file" at the District Court. They claim that the documents

bear no file stamp on them, were not made part of the record in the trial court, and were not

provided to Parents in preparation of their opening arguments, despite the fact that Parents'

counsel had made inquiry of the Clerk of the Second Judicial District Court about any

additional records. Parents argue that, because it is "clear" these appendices were not part of

the District Court record, the State improperly introduced the evidence in its brief on appeal,

and altering the record on appeal after the Parents prepared and filed their opening

arguments would be a violation of their due process rights.

The State counters that it has not improperly attempted to place non-record evidence

before this Court on appeal, representing that the exhibits were referenced in but not included

with the file that was transmitted to this Court upon filing of the notice of appeal and that

they were discussed during the terrnination hearing in this case. Counsel for the State

04/13/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0520
represents that, upon discovering that the exhibits were not included, she contacted the

District Court to ascertain whether there were any records that had been missed when the

electronic record was compiled for transmission on appeal; the clerk reported finding the

three documents loose in the court file and thereupon transmitted the additional documents to

this Court.

This Court's record confirms that the additional documents from the Utah court

proceeding were transmitted by the Clerk of District Court and received by the Clerk of this

Court on March 16, 2021, approximately a month after both of the Parents' briefs on appeal

were filed. As the documents were discovered in the court file and filed by the District Court

Clerk, the Court finds no impropriety in the State's inclusion of them as appendices to its

brief. The Parents may address the Utah court documents in their reply briefs.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Strike is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to give notice of this order to all counsel of record.

Dated this /3 day of April, 2021.
# Barack H. Obama Cabinet Nominations  

**

----

Article II, section 2 of the *Constitution* gives the Senate responsibility for considering and confirming the president's executive and judicial nominations.

**Footnotes:**

1. Withdrawn January 4, 2009.

2. Withdrawn February 12, 2009.

3. Continued from the previous administration.

4. Message of withdrawal received in the Senate on February 9, 2009.

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure
No. 1,388.

#### BRIGHT, Appellant, *v.*BURKE et al., Respondents.

*Appeal from District*Court, *Fergus County.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

*Mr. William M.*Blackford, and *Messrs. Stranahan & Stran-ahan,*for Appellant.

*Messrs. Cort &*Worden, for Respondents.

Decided November 21, 1901.

Per Guriam.

— Upon motion of the respondents this cause is this day dismissed, for failure to file briefs in accordance with Subdivision *6*of Rule X of this court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,160,211
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,230,937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,030,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          859,000
<BONDS>                                      5,877,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,252,641)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,030,299
<SALES>                                        361,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,901
<CGS>                                          213,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             477,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (554,666)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (554,666)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (554,666)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (47.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-38867, 333-53557 and 333-104622 on Form S-8 of our reports, which included
an explanatory paragraph related to the company's adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,
dated February 23, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
consolidated financial statement schedule of Renaissance Learning, Inc. and
management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Renaissance Learning,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

March 2, 2007
No. 1,581.

#### EVKOVICH, Respondent, *v.*BARNES, Appellant.

*Appeal from District Court, Granite Countyj Welling Nap-ton, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided Mar 16, 1903.

June 6, 1903.

*Mr.*IT. *E. Moore,*for Appellant.

*Messrs. Durfee £ Brown,*and *Mr. George A. Maywood,*for Respondent.

Pee, ('urtaM.

Upon motion of coiinsel for tlie respondent this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to a motion to reinstate.

Pee CuetaM. — The motion to reinstate the appeal herein, heretofore submitted to and by the the court taken under advisement, is denied.
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries



|Name                                 | Jurisdiction
of Incorporation | Percentage Ownership | Ownership
|------------------------------------ | ----------------------------- | -------------------- | ---------
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|Air Industries Machining, Corp.      | New York                      | 100%                 | 100%     
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|Welding Metallurgy, Inc.*            | New York                      | 100%                 | 100%     
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|Nassau Tool Works, Inc.              | New York                      | 100%                 | 100%     
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|Decimal Industries, Inc.             | New York                      | 100%                 | 100% *   
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|Compac Development Corporation *     | New York                      | **                   | 100% *   
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|Eur-Pac Corporation                  | Connecticut                   | 100%                 | 100%     
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|Electronic Connection Corporation    | Connecticut                   | 100%                 | 100%     
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|The Sterling Engineering Corporation | Connecticut                   | 100%                 | 100%     
|                                     |                               |                      |          
|Air Realty Group, LLC                | Connecticut                   | 100%                 | 100%     



* To be sold pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated March
21. 2018 with CPI Aerostructures, Inc.

** Owned
indirectly through Welding Metallurgy, Inc.
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

 

I, Martin A. Kropelnicki, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K/A of Hall, Kinion & Associates, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5.    The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operationof internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

# AGENCY:

United States Institute of Peace.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Agency announces its ongoing Priority Grant Competition. The Priority Grant Competition focuses on countries and topics as they relate to USIP's mandate. The Priority Grant Competition is restricted to projects that fit the themes identified for each priority area.

Starting October 1, the Priority Grant Competition will focus on five countries and one topic.
      - Afghanistan.
      - Iran.
      - Iraq.
      - Pakistan.
      - Sudan.
      - Communication for Peacebuilding.

                        The specific themes for each priority area may be found at our Web site at:                         *http://www.usip.org/​grants-fellowships/​priority-grant-competition.*

*Deadline:*                         The Priority Grant Competition applications are accepted throughout the year and awards are announced throughout the year. Please visit our Web site at:                         *http://www.usip.org/​grants-fellowships/​priority-grant-competition*                         for specific information on the competition as well as instructions about how to apply.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        If you are unable to access our Web site, you may submit an inquiry to: United States Institute of Peace, Grant Program, Priority Grant Competition, 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011. (202) 429-3842 (phone) (202) 833-1018 (fax) (202) 457-1719 (TTY)                         *E-mail: grants@usip.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Grant Program, Phone (202) 429-3842.                         *E-mail: grants@usip.org.*

Dated: May 11, 2010.

Michael Graham,

Vice President for Management.

[FR Doc. 2010-11575 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RUDY ABARCA

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00038

- C R

Appeal from

346 th District Court

Of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20 150D04057 )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right

of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of

appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than

March 31 , 201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14 th d ay of February , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL SHANE READ, 

 Appellant,

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00222-CR

Appeal from the

355th District Court 

of Hood County, Texas 

(TC# CR12347) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 26, 2018

No. 04-17-00214-CV

Amin Q. ALI and Salma Ali,

Appellants

v.

Nizarshah MOHAMMAD,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CI10486

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The Court has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Reconsideration En Banc and the 

motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Turnaround Partners, Inc. (the
“ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:April
                17, 2007
            By:*/s/
                Wm Chris Mathers*Name:Wm
                Chris MathersTitle:Chief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.