alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the Manager of 
Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: May 3, 2010.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           FDIC Ref. No.                  Bank name                City               State         Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10225.............................  BC National Banks....  Butler..............  MO                    4/30/2010
10226.............................  CF Bancorp...........  Port Huron..........  MI                    4/30/2010
10227.............................  Champion Bank........  Creve Coeur.........  MO                    4/30/2010
10229.............................  Eurobank.............  San Juan............  PR                    4/30/2010
10228.............................  Frontier Bank........  Everett.............  WA                    4/30/2010
10230.............................  R-G Premier Bank of    Hato Rey............  PR                    4/30/2010
                                     Puerto Rico.
10231.............................  Westernbank Puerto     Mayaguez............  PR                    4/30/2010
                                     Rico.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-11345 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[File No. 6145.]

#### THOMAS DAVIS, Respondent, v. STOCKGROWERS’ CREDIT CORPORATION, a Corporation, and J. E. Phelan. J. E. PHELAN, Appellant.

(249 N. W. 912.)

Opinion filed August 10, 1933.

*769
      *Byrne & Reichert*and W. *C, Crawford,*for appellant.

*770
      *C.*77. *Starhe,*for respondent.

Nuessle, Ch. J.

This is an action to recover damages for libel. The defamatory writing and the publication thereof on account of which the plaintiff claims to recover, are the same ones established and .for which the plaintiff had a recovery in Waite v. Stockgrowers’ Credit Corp. just decided, [ante, 763, 249 N. W. 910], The records in the ’two cases are practically the same, except that in the instant case the plaintiff Davis was not present at the trial and did not testify. Defendants offered no evidence. On motion at the close of the trial the court dismissed the case against the defendant Stockgrowers Credit Corporation but submitted it to the jury as against the defendant Phelan. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $120 actual dámages and $5 exemplary damages. Prom the judgment entered thereon, the defendant Phelan appeals.

The contentions made on the appeal are identical with those raised in the Waite Case. Por the same reasons as are stated in that case the .judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, unless the plain.tiff will remit his damages in excess of the sum of $25, and in case of such remission the judgment as entered will be amended accordingly, and as so amended affirmed.

Bubke, BiRdzell, ChRistiaNSON and Bukb, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew J.
Dennard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
         and

(4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Andrew J. Dennard



Andrew J. Dennard
Chief Financial Officer
March 5, 2003
# Edward P. Costigan: A Featured Biography

**

----

Edward P. Costigan served just one term in the Senate, from 1931 to 1937, but left an important legacy. Born in Virginia and raised in Colorado, Costigan established a successful law practice in Denver. His defense of the United Mine Workers in several high-profile cases brought him to public attention, and he became active in local and state politics. He helped organize the Progressive Party of Colorado and ran unsuccessfully for governor twice but succeeded in his bid for the Senate as a Democrat in 1930. Coming to office in the midst of the Great Depression, Costigan supported state relief programs, but it was his unyielding commitment to anti-lynching legislation that established his legacy. In 1933 Costigan drafted a federal anti-lynching bill. Cosponsored with New York senator Robert Wagner, the Costigan-Wagner Act sought to impose fines or imprisonment on local and state officials who failed to prevent death or injury at the hands of a lynch mob. The bill gained support from the Senate Judiciary Committee but fell victim to intense opposition from southern members and the general apathy of many northern senators. Two years later, Costigan again introduced an anti-lynching bill, prompting southern senators to launch a lengthy filibuster. Unable to muster the votes needed to end debate, Costigan withdrew his bill. Suffering ill health, he declined to seek reelection in 1936. He died in 1939 without ever seeing his bill come to a vote. In fact, not until 2022 did an anti-lynching bill finally become law, belatedly fulfilling Costigan’s legacy.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      330
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                        125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,201
<PP&E>                                             709
<DEPRECIATION>                                     168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              703
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,760)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,082
<SALES>                                          3,119
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,119
<CGS>                                            2,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,191
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     7
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,663)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,663)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.87)
        

</TABLE>
# Edward Dickinson Baker: A Featured Biography

**

----

The only sitting United States senator ever to die in combat, Edward Dickinson Baker of Oregon was killed on October 21, 1861, in the Battle of Ball’s Bluff. He led the regiment he had helped to raise when the Civil War began in the spring of 1861. Baker had practiced law in Springfield, Illinois, before being elected to the House of Representatives in 1845, defeating his friend Abraham Lincoln for the Whig nomination. In 1846, he resigned from the House of Representatives to command a brigade in the Mexican War. Baker moved to Oregon in 1860 and was elected to the Senate that same year. A skilled orator, he made a lasting impression upon the Senate when, dressed in military uniform, he delivered his famous call to arms on August 1, 1861. “We will rally the people, the loyal people, of the whole country,” he exclaimed, “they will pour forth their treasure, their money, their men, without stint, without measure.” Senator Baker’s tragic death prompted the creation of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War.

All Featured Biographies

        -  Contact 
        -  Leadership & Officers 
        -  Former Senators 
        -  Qualifications & Terms of Service 
        -  Facts & Milestones 
        -  States 

### Organizational Chart 

This chart shows the relationships among Senate leaders and officers who manage the flow of legislative and administrative business in the Senate.  

### Contact Your Senator 

Can't find your senator's name in the list of Senators?  Perhaps he or she is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, or a Senator in your State Legislature.

### Biographical Directory 

The Directory provides information about former and current senators.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roaming Messenger, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report") I,
Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


\s\ Jonathan Lei
-----------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Lei, Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the consolidated
financial statements of CNS Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,235
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,579
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,715
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         62,110
<ALLOWANCE>                                        410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,401
<DEPOSITS>                                      72,689
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                400
<LONG-TERM>                                        571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  95,401
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,803
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  945
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   633
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,881
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,572
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,610
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,271
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       63
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (13)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,449
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         862
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.32
<LOANS-NON>                                        156
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    18
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   388
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       41
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  410
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               410
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ORELLANA COTO,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 74098

Agency No. A094

- 454

- 080

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 15, 2016 **

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Orellana Coto, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appe als’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal fro m an

immigration judge’s decision denying h is application for withh olding of removal

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 25 2016

MOLLY C . DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 74098

j urisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for s ubstantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir.

2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that even if Orellana

Coto was credible, he failed to establish past persecution or a clear probability of

future persecution on account of a protected ground. See Parussimova v.

Mukasey , 555 F.3d 734, 74 1 (9th Cir. 2009) ( under the REAL ID Act

, “ to

demonstrate that a protected ground was ‘ at least one central reason ’ for

persecution, an applicant must prove that such ground was a cause of the

persecutors ’ acts ”). Thus, Orellana Coto’s withholding of removal claim fails

.

See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of Orellana Coto’s CAT

claim because he failed to establ ish it is more likely than not he would be tortured

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El

Salvador. See Silaya , 524 F.3d at 1073. We reject Orellana Coto’s contention

that the BIA did not consider his claim properly.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Searcy v. Fayette Home Telephone.

(Decided May 24, 1911.)

Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.

1. Appeal — M-oot Question — Where an action was brought to enjoin a municipality from enforcing a contract for telephone service, and the term of the contract had expired before the action was dismissed by the circuit court, the appeal presents only a moot question and will be dismissed.

2. Same — An appeal, like an ordinary action, can appropriate the time of the courts of the State only when there is some property right involved; when there Is something to be gained by the plaintiff if his prayer, as laid, should be granted.

J. A. EDGE for appellant.

ALLEN & DUNCAN, SHELBY and CHARLES A. KERR for ap-pellee.

Opinion op the Couet by

Judge Millee

Dismissing appeal.

By ordinauce approved February 12, 1906, the city of Lexington accepted the proposition of appellee to install a private switchboard and equip thirty complete stations at the Police Station of Lexington for a period of four years at $1,000 per year By this suit filed August 29,1908, on behalf of himself and the other taxpayers of Lexington, appellant sought to have said ordinance declared void, and the city prohibited from enforcing it and from paying out any money thereunder, upon the .ground that the proposition of the Telephone Company had not been published in the official newspaper along with the ordinance. The statute requires all ordinances to be published before they can become effective. The circuit judge first sustained a demurrer to the petition, and then dismissed it, and from that judgment the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal. Appellee has moved this court to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that it presents a moot question only.

The contract expired by its terms in February, 1910, and the judgment dismissing the petition was subsequently entered March 7th, 1910, after the contract had expired.

Assuming for the present that section 3063 of the Kentucky Statutes provides that the validity of city ordi*812nances may be tried in the manner here presented, it mnst nevertheless follow that the appeal must be dismissed for the want of a subject-matter of litigation.

An appeal, like an action, can appropriate the time of the courts of the State only when there is some property right involved; where there is something to be gained if the plaintiff’s prayer, as laid, should be granted. Otherwise, we have a mere academic discussion — a moot question. "Where neither party is to gain or lose by the result, the litigation is not only useless, but it is an imposition upon the State. It was never contemplated that either the opposing party or the State should unwillingly be burdened with the expense of trying such unsubstantial controversies. Courts are created for the purpose of trying cases rather than questions. Waller v. Henderson Telephone & Telegraph Co., 31 Ky. Law Rep., 39.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2460 Referred in House (RFH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2460

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2000

          Referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To authorize the payment of rewards to individuals furnishing 
   information relating to persons subject to indictment for serious 
 violations of international humanitarian law in Rwanda, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF REWARDS PROGRAM TO INCLUDE RWANDA.

    Section 102 of the Act of October 30, 1998 (Public Law 105-323) is 
amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by inserting ``or rwanda'' 
        after ``yugoslavia'';
            (2) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ``or the 
        International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda'' after 
        ``Yugoslavia''; and
            (3) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by inserting ``(1)'' immediately after 
                ``Reference.--''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) For the purposes of subsection (a), the statute of the 
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda means the statute contained 
in the annex to Security Council Resolution 955 of November 8, 1994.''.

            Passed the Senate June 23, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```