alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Slip Op. 01-19

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

___________________________________

:

THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : Court No. 99-08-00461

:

UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant, :

:

SKF USA INC. and SKF GmbH; :

FAG KUGELFISCHER GEORG SCHAFER AG :

and FAG BEARINGS CORPORATION, :

:

Defendant-Intervenors. :

___________________________________:

JUDGMENT

This Court having received and reviewed the United States

Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s

(“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand, Torrington Co. v. United States, 24 CIT ___, 116 F. Supp.

2d 1206 (2000) (“Remand Results”), and Commerce having complied

with the Court’s remand order and no responses to the Remand

Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on October

30, 2000 are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this

case is dismissed.

______________________________

NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

 SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: February 23, 2001

New York, New York
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           4,363
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   485
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     54,715
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             756
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        103,030
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,121)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,521
<DEPOSITS>                                     147,807
<SHORT-TERM>                                       182
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,094
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 167,521
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,379
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  846
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    85
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,310
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,409
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,413
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,897
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       48
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  13
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    896
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         616
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.65
<LOANS-NON>                                        221
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,052
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      111
<RECOVERIES>                                        52
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,121
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,121
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            142
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued February 20, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00490-CV

———————————

ANGELINA GAILEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF 

ESTATE OF PATRICK L. GAILEY, DAN PATRICK GAILEY, AND 

PATRICK L. GAILEY, Appellants

V.

PASQUAL GUTIERREZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2009-04324

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) 

(governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). 

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not 
2

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of 

case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a 

brief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF COMPANY'S 10QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,781,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,673,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,224,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,255,777
<PP&E>                                         400,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,655,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,464,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       218,765
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,460,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,655,758
<SALES>                                      2,900,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,900,729
<CGS>                                        1,788,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,788,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                506,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                   176,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            330,840
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   330,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-20383 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Marcelino Sanchez-Deleon, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-572-1

______________________________ Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender ap pointed to represent Marcelino Sanchez-Deleon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez-Deleon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’ s brief and the rele vant portions of

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 26, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-20383 Document: 00517046484 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/26/2024No. 23-20383

2 the record reflected therein. We conc ur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issu e for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilitie s herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 23-20383 Document: 00517046484 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/26/2024
APPENDIX A: APPROVED RESOLUTION OF THE

OCTOBER 18, 2011, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING

VOTED that the Executive Committee, on behalf of the Board of Regents pursuant to Board

Bylaw 3.01, affirms the fiscal years 2012 through 2015 goals for the Smithsonian as presented

by the Secretary.  [2011.10.01]
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00064-CV

NO. 02-17-00065-CV

NO. 02-17-00066-CV

NO. 02-17-00067-CV

NO. 02-17-00068-CV

MARCUS EUGENE BOONE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NOS. 1413540D, 1413538D, 1413539D, 1412646D, 1411974D

------------



### ORDER

------------

In each case, Appellant Marcus Eugene Boone challenges the trial court’s

order to withdraw funds from his inmate trust account. See Palomo v. State

, 322

S.W.3d 304, 305 & n.1 (Tex. App.

—Amarillo 2010, order), disp. on merits

, Nos.

07-10-00181-CV, 07-10-00182-CV, 07-10-00183-CV, 2010 WL 5250874 (Tex.App.

—Amarillo, no pet.); see also Harrell v. State

, 286 S.W.3d 315, 316 n.1 (Tex.

2009). Each order to withdraw is Attachment A to its corresponding May 5, 2016

judgment, “incorporated into the judgment[,] and made a part thereof.” The

amount of court costs in each order to withdraw does not match the

corresponding amount of court costs in the respective judgment and bill of cost.

Instead, the amount of court costs in each order to withdraw is the cumulative

total of court costs for all five cases. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal in

each case, and both parties have filed briefs.

We are unable to determine whether Appellant’s rights to due process

have been fully satisfied in the trial court. See Harrell

, 286 S.W.3d at 321;

Palomo

, 322 S.W.3d at 307. Appellant received notice via the order to withdraw

in each case. See Harrell

, 286 S.W.3d at 321; Palomo

, 322 S.W.3d at 307. He

also appears to have had “an adequate opportunity to compare the amounts

assessed by the trial court in the underlying criminal proceedings to the amounts”

listed in each order to withdraw. See Palomo

, 322 S.W.3d at 307; see also

Harrell

, 286 S.W.3d at 321. We are unable to determine, however, whether

Appellant has been

. . . “afforded an adequate opportunity to alert the court of

any alleged errors. Because the trial court has not entered an appealable order

either granting or denying a motion to confirm, modify, correct, or rescind the

prior withdrawal notification, we find Appellant’s notices of appeal to be

premature.” Palomo

, 322 S.W.3d at 307 (citation and internal quotation marks

omitted).

2Accordingly, we abate these appeals for 90 days from the date of this

order to allow Appellant time (1) to notify the trial court of any alleged error by

filing, as appropriate, a motion to modify, correct, or rescind the order to withdraw

funds in each case; (2) to present that motion to the trial court; (3) to schedule

any necessary hearing; and (4) to obtain from the trial court a written, appealable

order disposing of the motion in each case. See id. at 307

– 08. All appellate

deadlines in each case will run from the signing of the written, appealable order.

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the

attorneys of record, the appellant, the State, the trial court judge, the trial court

clerk, and the court reporter.

DATED March 21, 2017

.

PER CURIAM

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000743456
<NAME> 83A
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          81,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,361
<PP&E>                                      16,885,367
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,451,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,623,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,955
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,589,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,623,872
<SALES>                                        174,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,331
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (76,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (76,994)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (76,994)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24-0278
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: TASHA SQUILLACIOTTI,

Petitioner andAppellee, ORDER and BRIAN SQUILLACIOTTI,

Defendant and Appellant.

Pursuant to Appellant's motion for extension oftime to file his opening brief and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Appellant has until September 9, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve his openingbrief. DATEDthis LzPiay ofJuly, 2024. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 

# FILED JUL 22 2024 Bovven Greerratiood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 07/22/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0278
EX-4.6









EXHIBIT 4.6




CONSENT OF EXPERT




     I, Ronald Moran, hereby consent to the inclusion and incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement on Form F-8 of Silvercorp Metals Inc. (the “Registration Statement”) of
references to and information derived the technical report entitled “N1 43-101 Technical Report and
Pre-Feasibility Study — TLP — LM Silver-Lead Projects, Henan Province, People’s Republic of China”
dated November 20, 2008 (the “Incorporated Information”). I also consent to the reference to my
name and to my involvement in the preparation of the Incorporated Information in this Registration
Statement.



	 	 	 
	  /s/ Ronald Moran
 

Name: Ronald Moran

	 	 






Date: June 15, 2009
# Senators' Papers and Archives

**

----

The records created and maintained within a senator's office are the property of the senator. Most senators donate their collections to a research repository in their home state when they leave office. At the repository, the records are made available to researchers after an appropriate amount of time has passed. Senatorial collections are valued by research libraries because they are rich sources for the study of local and national history, regional issues, national affairs, political science theory, foreign affairs, and public policy. While print and broadcast sources contain a great deal of congressional information, it is the senators’ personal papers that contain the most comprehensive and authentic record. Senators' papers are one of the two major sources (the other being records of Senate committees) that document the history of the legislative branch of government.

Typically, senators’ collections include correspondence, memos, reports, press communications, appointment calendars, speeches, voting records, photographs, recorded interviews and broadcasts, and social media communications in both textual and electronic formats that document the legislative and constituent services work of the office. They may also include information on personal and political activities, legislation development, constituent services, media activities, and basic office administration. Many collections include papers from family members and from senators’ pre- and post-Senate careers. Because of their breadth and coverage, these collections are valued as major primary resources for the study of America's past.

More than 2,000 individuals have served in the United States Senate, and most of those careers have been documented in personal collections. In addition, many records can be found in the collections of their professional colleagues, other contemporaries such as journalists, and in the archives of professional organizations and associations. Approximately 600 publicly accessible research institutions across the country hold these collections. They include senators’ personal papers, family papers, staff papers, correspondence with key individuals and organizations, and oral history interviews. Collectively, these materials document the lives and careers of former senators, their legislative priorities, and the legislative, political, and democratic processes of the United States Senate.

For information about the location of any senator's archival collections see his or her entry in the Biographical Directory of the U.S. Congress. For access to Senate web harvests see the National Archives' Federal Web Harvests.

 

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Questions about Senate History? 

Email a Senate historian:historian@sec.senate.gov
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Edgar Filing








EXHIBIT 10.2

DEPOSIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Between Holloman Minerals Pty. Ltd. and

Strongbow Resources Inc.







WHEREAS, in connection with that “Term Sheet Agreement” by and between Strongbow Resources Inc., formerly Plush Mall Inc. (“SRI”), and Holloman Minerals Pty. Ltd. (“HML”) dated November 28, 2007, and subsequently extended by amendment (the “Agreement”),  SRI paid to HML a good faith deposit (the “Deposit’) in the amount of USD$300,000, and;




WHEREAS, SRI and HML have mutually agreed not to pursue creation of the exploration joint venture contemplated in the Agreement, and;




WHEREAS, SRI and HML recognize the expenditures incurred by both parties to the Agreement and jointly desire to amicably unwind all commitments related to the Agreement and cause a settlement and return of the Deposit,




NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is herewith acknowledged, SRI and HML hereby agree as follows:




HML has agreed to pay, and SRI has agreed to accept, USD$275,000 as full and final settlement and return of the Deposit paid in connection with the Agreement. Such settlement and repayment to be effective this 29th day of May, 2009. Each party releases the other from any and all claims with respect to the Agreement.




		
	 
	 

	STRONGBOW RESOURCES INC


	 
	 

	By:

	/s/ HERBERT SCHMIDT


	 
	Herbert Schmidt,


	 
	Chief Financial Officer







		
	 
	 

	HOLLOMAN MINERALS PTY. LTD.


	 
	 

	By:

	/s/ MARK STEVENSON


	 
	Mark Stevenson, 


	 
	Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 12.01

               Travelers Property Casualty Corp. and Subsidiaries
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                   (In millions of dollars, except for ratio)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   All Companies Consolidated
                                                                     Year ended December 31,
                                                   -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      1997         1996         1995         1994         1993
                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------     --------
<S>                                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>
Income from continuing operations,
   before income taxes and cumulative
   effect of accounting changes                    $   1,752    $     487    $     551    $     210     $    170
Interest                                                 163          118            -            -            -
Portion of rentals deemed to be interest                  55           45           33           32           40
                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------     --------
Income available for fixed charges                 $   1,970    $     650    $     584    $     242     $    210
                                                   =========    =========    =========    =========     ========

Fixed charges:
     Interest                                      $     163    $     118    $       -    $       -     $      -
     Portion of rentals deemed to be interest             55           45           33           32           40
                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------     --------
Total fixed charges                                $     218    $     163    $      33    $      32     $     40
                                                   =========    =========    =========    =========     ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     9.04x         3.99x       17.53x        7.56x        5.29x
                                                   --------     ---------    ---------    ---------     --------
</TABLE>


The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
before income taxes and fixed charges by the fixed charges. For purposes of this
ratio, fixed charges consist of that portion of rentals deemed representative of
the appropriate interest factor.
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Spartan Motors, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:  1.
     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and2.
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of such period and results of operations of the Company for such period.
   Dated:  August 5, 2010
     /s/ John E. SztykielJohn E. SztykielPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated:  August 5, 2010
     /s/ Joseph M. NowickiJoseph M. Nowicki
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





---