alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-110629 and No. 333-130484) andon Form S-8 (No. 333-39592, No. 333-42616, No. 333-47250, No. 333-84825, No. 333-88418,No. 333-88420, No. 333-90795, No. 333-110516 and No. 333-120439) of Emdeon Corporationof our reports dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Emdeon Corporation, Emdeon Corporation’s management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting ofEmdeon Corporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year endedDecember 31, 2005.   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP MetroPark, New Jersey  August 30, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 4139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1130]



[[Page 4139]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 16, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, February 16, 2010, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. 
Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 
Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 15, 2010.
Linda Rivera,
Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-1130 Filed 1-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Commonwealth, By, et al. v. Thompson.

(Decided January 26, 1912.)

Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (Common Law and Equity Division.)

1. Appeals from County Courts to Circuit Courts. — Where the party appealing from the judgment of a county court produces to the clerk of the circuit court within sixty days thereafter, a certified copy of the judgment of the county court, and the amount of costs, as required hy section 724 of the Civil Code, the appeal is taken in time.

2. Court Records — Correction. of. — The record of the clerk showing the date upon .which the transcript for an appeal was filed, should not he changed or corrected, in the absence of fraud, accident or mistake.

W. A. PRICE, B. W. GILFILLAN and F J. HANLON for appellant.

ROBERT C. SIMMONS for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

Reversing.

The facts presented by this appeál are identical with the facts of the late cases of Commonwealth v. Evans, Commonwealth v. Warner, and Commonwealth v. Fritz, reported in 146 Ky., 229; and, for the reasons given in the opinion reversing the judgments in those cases, the judgment of the lower court in this case is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I, David
S. Gartner, certify that:
 
 1.
    
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Metropolitan Health
      Networks, Inc.;
 
 2.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      annual report;
 
 3.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report:
 
 4.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:
 
 a)
    
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;
 
 b)
    
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
    
    disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.
 
 5.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of registrant’s Board of
      Directors:
 
 a)
    
    all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)
    
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 ****Date: March 22, 2005
    By:
    /s/ David S.
  GartnerDavid S. GartnerChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of our report dated April 10, 1998 except for Note 1 as to which
the date is April 20, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Global Med Technologies, Inc. included by reference in this
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1997:

1.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-28155) pertaining to the
    registration of 1,234,279 shares of Global Med Technologies, Inc. stock
    dated May 30, 1997 for the Amended and Restated Option Plan.

2.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-39193) pertaining to the
    registration of 100,000 shares of Global Med Technologies, Inc. stock
    dated October 31, 1997 for the 1997 Employee Stock Compensation Plan.

3.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-45031) pertaining to the
    registration of 965,721 shares of Global Med Technologies, Inc. stock
    dated January 27, 1998 for the Second Amended and Restated Stock Option
    Plan.



                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Denver, Colorado
April 20, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25305-25306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12100 and <greek-i>12101]


Massachusetts Disaster Number MA-00025

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA-1895-DR), 
dated 03/29/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/12/2010 and continuing through 04/26/2010.
    Effective Date: 04/26/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/28/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, dated 03/29/2010 is 
hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning 03/12/2010 and continuing through 04/26/2010.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.


[[Page 25306]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-10777 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000743456
<NAME> 83A
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         143,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  185,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               328,218
<PP&E>                                      16,890,224
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,518,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,699,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,819
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,649,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,699,528
<SALES>                                        814,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               818,388
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  726,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 91,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    91,991
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Jay M. Mullin, Respondent, *v.*Kate Curtis, Appellant.

First Department,

June 2, 1911.

Practice — change of venue — convenience of witnesses — place of contract.

Where upon a motion for a change of venue of an action on contract the terms of which are in dispute, the number of material witnesses in each county seems to be about equal, the trial should be had in the county in which the contract was made and was to have been performed.

Appeal by the defendant, Kate Curtis, from an order of the Silpreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on . the 28th day of March, 1911, denying the defendant’s motion 'to change the place of' trial from the county of New York to the county of Monroe..

*George D. Reed,*for the appellant.

*Isadore FinJcler,*for the respondent.

Laughlin, J.:

The Mullin Film Service was a domestic corporation having its principal office in the city of Syracuse, N. Y.; and by a contract negotiated and made in the city of Rochester, N: Y., it rented to the defendant certain films to he delivered to and used by her at her theatre in the latter city. The action is on an assigned claim for rent of films alleged to be due and owing under said contract. The defense interposed is that the films on which rental is claimed to he due were found on delivery not to he according to the contract, and were returned, and that the contract was on that ground rescinded. The terms of the contract, which was negotiated and made in Monroe county and to he performed there, as well as the performance thereof, *442are controverted. On conflicting affidavits with respect tó the convenience of the material' witnesses, these are deemed important conditions and, on the facts here. presented, require that the place of trial should lie changed to Monroe county.

It follows, therefore, that the order should he reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the' motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin,- Clarke and Scótt, JJ., concurred. ■ v *1*

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 22- 2409 LT Case No. 2017

- CF

- 000645

- AX

_____________________________ S T EVEN A NTHONY H AMMONDS , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORI DA , A ppellee.

_____________________________
On a ppeal from the Circuit Court f or Lake County

. Larry M etz , J udge

. Matthew J

. M etz, Public D efender, a nd Ali L. H ansen , Assistant Public D e fender, Daytona B e ach, for A ppellant. Ashley M oody, A tto rney G e neral, Tallahasse e , a nd Whitney Brown Har tless , A ssi stant A ttorney G ene ral, D aytona B e ach, f o r Appellee. April 2, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED
. W ALLIS , E ISNA UGLE , and H ARRIS , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                   MONARCH DENTAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                          --------------------------
                                                             1998            1997
                                                          ----------      ----------
<S>                                                       <C>             <C>       
Income (loss) before extraordinary item                   $     (424)     $    2,135
Extraordinary loss, net of applicable tax benefit               --              (264)
                                                          ----------      ----------
Net income (loss)                                         $     (424)     $    1,871
                                                          ==========      ==========


Weighted average common shares outstanding                    10,805           6,369
Weighted average common equivalent shares outstanding           --             1,977
                                                          ----------      ----------
Weighted average common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding                                          10,805           8,346
                                                          ==========      ==========
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE:
Income (loss) before extraordinary item                   $    (0.04)     $     0.34
Extraordinary item                                              --             (0.05)
                                                          ----------      ----------
Net income (loss)                                         $    (0.04)     $     0.29
                                                          ==========      ==========


NET INCOME PER SHARE - ASSUMING DILUTION:
Income (loss) before extraordinary item                   $    (0.04)     $     0.26
Extraordinary item                                              --             (0.04)
                                                          ----------      ----------
Net income (loss)                                         $    (0.04)     $     0.22
                                                          ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

 

I, Martin A. Kropelnicki, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of Hall, Kinion & Associates, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure conrols and procedures to be desinged under our supervisionto ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in the report any change in registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001009773
<NAME>                        Room Plus, Inc.
<CURRENCY>                                     US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                          185,843
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    67,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                   1,904,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,797,309
<PP&E>                                        3,745,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,940,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                6,067,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,112,670
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          5,832
<OTHER-SE>                                    6,512,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  6,067,551
<SALES>                                      16,851,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             16,851,321
<CGS>                                         7,418,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 9,979,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,131,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              106,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2,896,856)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (996,805)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,900,051)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.43)
        


</TABLE>
No. 1,810.

#### STATE ex rel. COLLINS, Relator, *v.*DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT et al., Respondents.

Wilt of supervisory control.

Decided April 11, 1902.

*Mr. 8. 0.*Herron, and *Mr. Charles B. Saclcett,*for Relator.

Pee Cueiam.

Relator’s application for a writ of supervisory control herein! is denied.