alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2117 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2117

 To amend title 9, United States Code, with respect to consumer credit 
                             transactions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2000

  Mr. Feingold  (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 9, United States Code, with respect to consumer credit 
                             transactions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Credit Fair Dispute 
Resolution Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. CONSUMER CREDIT TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) Definition.--Section 1 of title 9, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``and `commerce' 
        defined'' and inserting ``, `commerce', `consumer credit 
        transaction', and `consumer credit contract' defined''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``; `consumer credit transaction', as herein 
        defined, means the right granted to a natural person to incur 
        debt and defer its payment, where the credit is intended 
        primarily for personal, family, or household purposes; and 
        `consumer credit contract', as herein defined, means any 
        contract between the parties to a consumer credit 
        transaction.''.
    (b) Agreements To Arbitrate.--Section 2 of title 9, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Notwithstanding 
the preceding sentence, a written provision in any consumer credit 
contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by 
arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of the contract, or 
the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, shall not be 
valid or enforceable. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the 
enforcement of any written agreement to settle by arbitration a 
controversy arising out of a consumer credit contract, if such written 
agreement has been entered into by the parties to the consumer credit 
contract after the controversy has arisen.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70527) pertaining to the Globecomm Systems Inc. 1997
Stock Incentive Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-102928) pertaining to the Globecomm
Systems Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated September 4, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Globecomm
Systems Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June
30, 2003.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Melville, New York
September 29, 2003
**Exhibit
      32.01**





**FNB
      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**








**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of FNB Financial Services
      Corporation (the “Company”) certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.








Dated:
                November 7, 2006
            */s/
                PRESSLEY A.RIDGILL*Pressley
                A. RidgillChief
                Executive OfficerDated:
                November 7, 2006
            */s/**MICHAEL
                W. SHELTON*Michael
                W. SheltonChief
                Financial Officer








*This
      certificate is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
      the
      knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.




28
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACK POLSKY,

Appellant,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2932

[April 5, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Richard L. Oftedal, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2015CA008699XXXXMB.

Stephen L. Cook, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellant.

Kristie Hatcher-Bolin of GrayRobinson, P.A., Lakeland, and Thomas H. 

Loffredo and Rebecca A. Rodriguez of GrayRobinson, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of XETA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jack R. Ingram, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                     |

 

|   | /s/  JACK R. INGRAM                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                |
|   | **Jack R.   Ingram   Chief Executive Officer** |
|   |                                           |
|   | June 10, 2004                                  |
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Franklin Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
H. Siemers, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas H. Siemers
------------------------------------
Thomas H. Siemers
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Franklin Corporation and will be retained by First Franklin
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Principal Executive Officer of American Fiber Green Products, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2009                                     
|                                                         
|/s/ MICHAEL A. FREID                                     
|Chief Financial Officer and 
Principal Accounting Officer
|                                                         
|                                                         
|Date: April 14, 2009                                     
|                                                         
|/s/ DANIEL L. HEFNER                                     
|President and Director
 (Principal Executive Officer)
463 A.2d 28

#### Melzer, Appellant v. Witsberger.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Granted Oct. 18, 1983.

Argued February 24, 1983.

Harry J. Cancelmi, Jr., for appellant; James H. McCune, for appellee.

Before SPAETH, BROSKY and MONTEMURO, JJ.

The order of the lower court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11780]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060 and 1061 (Review)


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From China and India; Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on 
carbazole violet pigment 23 from India would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time and that revocation 
of the antidumping duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 from 
China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence 
of material injury to an industry in the United States within a 
reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on November 2, 2009 (74 FR 
56663) and determined on February 5, 2010 that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (75 FR 14468, March 25,2010).
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on May 10, 2010. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 4151 (April 2010), entitled 
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India: Investigation Nos. 
701-TA-437 and 731-TA 1060 and 1061 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: May 11, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-11780 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apex Resources Group, Inc.,on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, John
Ray Rask, Principal Executive Officer and John M. Hickey, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
     or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.



  Date:    February 16, 2004         /s/ John Ray Rask
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     John  Ray Rask, Principal Executive Officer



  Date:   February 16, 2004          /s/ John M. Hickey
                                     ------------------------------------
                                     John M. Hickey, Principal Financial Officer
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WI-FI ONE, LLC,

Appellant

v.

BROADCOM CORPORATION,

Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1945

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-

00602.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DOUGLAS AARON CAWLEY, McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, 

TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DONALD 

PUCKETT, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX; PETER 

J. AYERS, Lee & Hayes, PLLC, Austin, TX.

KEVIN GOLDMAN, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and 

Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC E. MASSA, ZACHARY PICCOLOMINI,

KATIE SAXTON. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 September 16, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-KSB
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,323
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,359
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     20,352
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,720
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            15,084
<LOANS>                                         90,532
<ALLOWANCE>                                        877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,458
<DEPOSITS>                                     125,187
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,129
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,157
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 142,458
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,011
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,065
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   395
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,471
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,261
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,210
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,065
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,065
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.20
<LOANS-NON>                                         45
<LOANS-PAST>                                       448
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   747
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      303
<RECOVERIES>                                       133
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  877
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               877
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            434
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 50995 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Christopher Najera,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:22

- CR

- 43

- 1

**____________________ __________**  Before **Davis, Haynes,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Najera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Najera has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to all ow us to make a fair evaluation of Najera ’s claims of

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50995 Document: 00516865662 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2023No. 22

- 50995

2 ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims

w ithout prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Najera ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Case: 22-50995 Document: 00516865662 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2023
#### Kentucky State Journal Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Board.

(Decided January 27, 1915.)

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

CHARLES CARROLL, W. PRATT DALE, BROWN & NUCKOLS and ELMER C. UNDERWOOD for appellant. ,

JAMES GARNETT, Attorney General; ROBERT T. CALDWELL,' Assistant Attorney General, and OTTO WOLPP’ for appellee.

BbspoNse to Petition eoe Reheaeing by

Special Judge Dobsey*

Extending opinion in 161 Ky., 562.

In tbe petition for a rehearing we are asked to modify and extend tbe opinion. While in no particular receding from tbe position taken in tbe opinion herein, we bave thought proper to make certain statements therein more explicit.

First: Tbe provisions of tbe present Compensation Act, as far as they affect tbe employer, are unobjection*388able, as they do not conflict with any provisions of the ■Constitution.

Second: Any employe coming within the provisions of the act may voluntarily agree to accept its provisions fixing and limiting his recovery in case of injury.

Third: He may likewise voluntarily accept the provisions of the act fixing the amount that shall be recovered in the event of his death, and said sum should be paid to his dependents if he leaves any, and if not, to his personal representatives. The Legislature has. no power to direct that this sum shall in any event be paid into the compensation fund.

Fourth: Some provision should be made in the act whereby the employe signifies his acceptance of the provisions of the act by some affirmative act on his part. Silence on this subject should not be construed into acceptance.

Fifth: Provision should be made in the act for appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction for review in all cases where compensation is denied or where a less sum is allowed by the board than that claimed by the injured employe.

For the reasons indicated in the opinion the act in its entirety is void. The petition for a rehearing is overruled.

*

Two of the regular Judges, Judges Hannah and Nunn, having declined to sit in this case because of interest, pursuant to Section 117 of the Constitution, Hon. J. L. Dorsey, of Henderson, and Hon. J, M. Lassing, of Newport, were appointed by the Governor as Special Judges.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00003-CR

JOE HENRY GARCIA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-14-3252CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 21, 2016
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-110629 and No. 333-130484) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-39592, No. 333-42616, No. 333-47250, No.333-84825, No. 333-88418, No. 333-88420, No. 333-90795, No. 333-110516 and No. 333-120439) ofEmdeon Corporation of our reports dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Emdeon Corporation, EmdeonCorporation’s management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Emdeon Corporation,included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLPMetroPark, New JerseyMarch 16, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, I, the undersigned
Chief  Financial Officer of American Ecology Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify,  based  on  my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for  the  period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934  and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ James R. Baumgardner
------------------------
James R. Baumgardner
August 3, 2004


                                       35
<PAGE>