alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION




<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warp 9, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the "Report") I, Harinder
Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18USC ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:


         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  May 21, 2007




By: \s\ Harinder Dhillon
------------------------------------------------------------
     Harinder Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and President
    (Principal Executive Officer)

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### EDWIN K. LIVINGSTON, Appellant, v. MIDDLEWEST GRAIN COMPANY, a Corporation, and H. T. Hogy, Respondents.

(173 N. W. 474.)

This case is governed by the decision in Kluver v. Middlewest Grain Co. ante, 210.

Opinion filed June 21, 1919.

From an order of the District Court of Ward County, *Leighton,*J., plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

TF. *H. Sibbaldj*for appellant.

*Fiske &*Murphy, for respondents.

Pee Curiam.

This case was submitted together with Kluver v. Middlewest Grain Co. ante, 210, 173 N. W. 468. The facts in the instant case are identical with those in the Kluver Case, and on the authority of the decision rendered in that case, the order appealed from is affirmed.

Grace, J., concurs in the result.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-72,764] 

                    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 17th, 2009, applicable to workers of International Paper Company, Franklin Pulp & Paper Mill, Franklin, Virginia. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7034).                 

At the request of the Company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of uncoated freesheet paper and coated paperboard. 

The company reports that workers leased from Railserve were employed on-site at the Franklin, Virginia location of International Paper Company, Franklin Pulp & Paper Mill. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers. 

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Railserve working on-site at the Franklin, Virginia location of International Paper Company, Franklin Pulp & Paper Mill. 

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,764 is hereby issued as follows: 

“All workers International Paper Company, Franklin Pulp & Paper Mill, including on-site leased workers from Railserve, Franklin, Virginia, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 3, 2008, through December 17, 2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.” 

Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of April 2010. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-11280 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 11

Statement re computation of per-share earnings

Basic per share data is calculated based on the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the reported periods. Diluted per share data includes any dilution from potential common stock outstanding, such as the exercise of stock options.



|                                                                              |  |                             |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --------- | ------------------------- | - | --------- |  | ---- | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                                                              |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |           | Six Months Ended June 30,
|                                                                              |  | 2006                        |           | 2005                      |   | 2006      |  | 2005
|Numerator:                                                                    |  |                             |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Net income                                                                    |  | $                           | 3,494,000 |                           | $ | 3,339,000 |  | $    | 6,744,000 |  | $ | 7,081,000
|                                                                              |  |                             |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Denominator:                                                                  |  |                             |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Denominator for basic income per share - weighted-average shares              |  |                             | 9,782,328 |                           |   | 8,164,511 |  |      | 8,988,646 |  |   | 8,163,782
|Dilutive potential common shares - employee stock options                     |  |                             | 4,615     |                           |   | 14,942    |  |      | 8,911     |  |   | 15,514   
|                                                                              |  |                             |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted-average shares |  |                             | 9,786,943 |                           |   | 8,179,453 |  |      | 8,997,557 |  |   | 8,179,296
|                                                                              |  |                             |           |                           |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          



29
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11

Computation of Earnings per Share
(dollars in thousands, except shares and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                   For the Nine Months     For the Three Months
                                                    ended September 30      ended September 30
                                                   -------------------     --------------------
                                                      1997       1996         1997       1996
                                                   ---------  ---------    ---------  ---------
<S>                                                <C>        <C>          <C>         <C>
PRIMARY:
 
Average shares outstanding                         3,684,104  3,684,104    3,684,104  3,684,104
 
Impact of Treasury Shares                             34,692     19,506       41,584     22,835
                                                   ---------  ---------    ---------  ---------
Total                                              3,649,412  3,664,598    3,642,520  3,661,269
                                                   =========  =========    =========  =========
 
Net Income                                            $4,761     $4,759       $1,668     $1,743
                                                   =========  =========    =========  =========
 
Preferred Stock Dividends                             $1,058       $852         $352       $360
                                                   =========  =========    =========  =========
Net Income Available to
Common Shareholders                                   $3,703     $3,907       $1,316     $1,383
                                                   =========  =========    =========  =========
Earnings Per Share
Applicable to Common Stock                             $1.01      $1.07         $.36       $.38
                                                   =========  =========    =========  =========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1**Certification**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Bowater Incorporated (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.   Dated: August 9, 2007 /s/ David J. Paterson     Name: David J. Paterson
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 93 (Friday, May 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11728]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  Wednesday, May 19, 2010; 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

Place:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status:  Closed to the Public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: May 11, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11728 Filed 5-12-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10516 Summary Calendar

GERALD L. BRUMLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; MARIE C. KALB, Claims Manager for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-1288-D

- - - - - - - - - - May 22, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gerald L. Brumley contends that the district court erred in concluding that his lawsuit was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Four conditions must be satisfied to apply the doctrine. “First, the parties in a later action must be identical to (or at least be in privity with) the parties in a prior action. Second, the judgment in the prior action must havebeen rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction. Third, the

prior action must have concluded with a final judgment on the merits. Fourth, the same claim or cause of action must be involved in both suits.” United States v. Shanbaum , 10 F.3d 305, 310 (5th Cir. 1994)(internal citations omitted). The Eight Circuit was a court of competent jurisdiction and it rendered a final judgment in the prior case. See Brumley v. United States Dep’t of Labor , 28 F.3d 746, 746-48 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 734 (1995). Both suits arise from the Departmentr of Labor’s decision not to give effect to Brumley's election of benefits because he did not complete form CA-8. See Slaughter v. AT&T Information Systems, Inc. , 905 F.2d 92, 93-94 (5th Cir 1990); Agrilectric Power Partners, Ltd. v. General Electric Co. , 20 F.3d 663, 664 (5th Cir. 1994). On appeal, Brumley does not challenge the district court conclusion that Kalb was in privity with the Department of Labor as their employee. As this issue was not discussed in the brief, it is deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). This court "will not raise and discuss legal issues that [an appellant] has failed to assert." Id

. The Department of Labor’s motion to supplement the record is denied as unnecessary.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 04-0140

IN RE  OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND OMNI HOTELS FRANCHISING COMPANY, L.L.C.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s emergency motion for stay, filed February 17, 2004, is granted.   All underlying proceedings in Cause No. 02-2865-A-1, styled *In The Matter of The Estate of Matt King, Jr., deceased*, in the Probate Court No 1 of Tarrant County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The parties are requested to file full briefing. See attached briefing schedule.

Done at the City of Austin, this February 24, 2004.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Nancy J. Vega, Chief Deputy Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2000-7257; Notice No. 61]


Railroad Safety Advisory Committee; Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Announcement of Charter Renewal of the Railroad Safety Advisory 
Committee (RSAC).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA announces the charter renewal of the RSAC, a Federal 
Advisory Committee that develops railroad safety regulations through a 
consensus process. This charter renewal will take effect on May 17, 
2010, and will expire after 2 years.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Woolverton, RSAC Administrative 
Officer/Coordinator, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Mailstop 25, 
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6212; or Grady Cothen, Deputy Associate 
Administrator for Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Mailstop 
25, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6302.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), FRA is giving notice of the 
charter renewal for the RSAC. The RSAC was established to provide 
advice and recommendations to FRA on railroad safety matters. The RSAC 
is composed of 54 voting representatives from 31 member organizations, 
representing various rail industry perspectives. In addition, there are 
non-voting advisory representatives from the agencies with railroad 
safety regulatory responsibility in Canada and Mexico, the National 
Transportation Safety Board, and the Federal Transit Administration. 
The diversity of the Committee ensures the requisite range of views and 
expertise necessary to discharge its responsibilities. See the RSAC Web 
site for details on pending tasks at: http://rsac.fra.dot.gov/. Please 
refer to the notice published in the Federal Register on March 11, 
1996, 61 FR 9740, for additional information about the RSAC.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 7, 2010.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-11382 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
**Exhibit
      32.01**





**FNB
      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**








**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of FNB Financial Services
      Corporation (the “Company”) certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.








Dated:
            May
                9, 2006
            */s/
                PRESSLEY A.RIDGILL*Pressley
                A. RidgillChief
                Executive OfficerDated:
            May
                9, 2006
            */s/**Michael
                W. Shelton*Michael
                W. SheltonChief
                Financial Officer










*This
      certificate is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
      the
      knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,515,572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,642,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                    49,436
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,219,093
<PP&E>                                         882,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                 297,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,016,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          816,051
<BONDS>                                        605,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,756
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,292,488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,016,855
<SALES>                                     12,358,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,588,619
<CGS>                                        4,207,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,207,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,169,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,207,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,031,302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            175,981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   175,981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1909-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1909-DR), dated May 4, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 5, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of May 4, 2010.

    Dyer and Montgomery Counties for Individual Assistance.
    Dyer and Montgomery Counties for debris removal and emergency 
protective measures (Categories A and B), including direct Federal 
assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-11503 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P