alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2084

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of

the charitable deduction allowable for contributions of food inventory,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 22, 2000

Mr. LUGAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the amount of the charitable deduction allowable for

contributions of food inventory, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hunger Relief Tax

5 Incentive Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF

7 FOOD INVENTORY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 170 of

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain
2

•S 2084 IS

1 contributions of ordinary income and capital gain prop2 erty) is amended by adding at the end the following new

3 paragraph:

4 ‘‘(7) SPECIAL RULE FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF

5 FOOD INVENTORY.—For purposes of this section—

6 ‘‘(A) CONTRIBUTIONS BY NON-CORPORATE

7 TAXPAYERS.—In the case of a charitable con8 tribution of food, paragraph (3)(A) shall be ap9 plied without regard to whether or not the con10 tribution is made by a corporation.

11 ‘‘(B) LIMIT ON REDUCTION.—In the case

12 of a charitable contribution of food which is a

13 qualified contribution (within the meaning of

14 paragraph (3)(A), as modified by subparagraph

15 (A) of this paragraph)—

16 ‘‘(i) paragraph (3)(B) shall not apply,

17 and

18 ‘‘(ii) the reduction under paragraph

19 (1)(A) for such contribution shall be no

20 greater than the amount (if any) by which

21 the amount of such contribution exceeds

22 twice the basis of such food.

23 ‘‘(C) DETERMINATION OF FAIR MARKET

24 VALUE.—In the case of a charitable contribu25 tion of food which is a qualified contribution
3

•S 2084 IS

1 (within the meaning of paragraph (3), as modi2 fied by subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this para3 graph) and which, solely by reason of internal

4 standards of the taxpayer, lack of market, or

5 similar circumstances, or which is produced by

6 the taxpayer exclusively for the purposes of

7 transferring the food to an organization de8 scribed in paragraph (3)(A), cannot or will not

9 be sold, the fair market value of such contribu10 tion shall be determined—

11 ‘‘(i) without regard to such internal

12 standards, such lack of market, such cir13 cumstances, or such exclusive purpose, and

14 ‘‘(ii) if applicable, by taking into ac15 count the price at which the same or simi16 lar food items are sold by the taxpayer at

17 the time of the contribution (or, if not so

18 sold at such time, in the recent past).’’.

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

20 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

21 December 31, 2000.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2051 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2051

 To revise the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2000

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Golden Gate National Recreation Area 
Boundary Adjustment Act of 2000.''

SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO THE GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA.

    Section 2(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the Golden 
Gate National Recreation Area in the State of California, and for other 
purposes'' (16 U.S.C. 460bb-1(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``The recreation area shall also include the land generally 
depicted on the map entitled `Additions to Golden Gate National 
Recreation Area', numbered NPS-80,073 and dated January, 2000/PWR-
PLRPC. All transactions concerning the Golden Gate National Recreation 
Area shall involve willing sellers and willing buyers.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 4.1

                                   RESOLUTIONS

     WHEREAS, the Company is indebted Charles Jarvis and Associates, Inc. for
consulting services rendered and expenses incurred in connection with the
business of the Company.

     WHEREAS, the Company is indebted to Suns Associate Group for services
rendered in furtherance of the Companys business.

     WHEREAS, the Company is indebted to USIS International Capital Corporation
for services rendered in furtherance of the Companys business.

RESOLVED, that in payment for consulting services provided to the Company by
Charles Jarvis and Associate, the Company grants 50,000 shares of the Company's
common stock to be registered in a registration statement on Form S-8 to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") promptly after the
Company becomes current in all if its filing obligations under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

RESOLVED, that in payment for consulting services provided to the Company by
Suns Associates Group, the Company grants 200,000 shares of the Company's common
stock to be registered in a registration statement on Form S-8 to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") promptly after the Company
becomes current in all if its filing obligations under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

RESOLVED, that in payment for consulting services provided to the Company by
USIS International Capital Corporation, the Company grants 250,000 shares of the
Company's common stock to be registered in a registration statement on Form S-8
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") promptly after
the Company becomes current in all if its filing obligations under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 23, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 23, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0478. J&R SCHUGEL TRUCKING, INC. et al. v. DONNA LOGAN.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CV259701
EXHIBIT 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NuWave Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date: April 13, 2005
                             By:   /s/ George Kanakis
                                -----------------------------------------
                                   George Kanakis
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Principal Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NuWave Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NuWave Technologies, Inc., and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2404 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2404

To amend chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that any 
 Federal law enforcement officer who is convicted of a felony shall be 
                      terminated from employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 12, 2000

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that any 
 Federal law enforcement officer who is convicted of a felony shall be 
                      terminated from employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANDATORY TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF FEDERAL LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS CONVICTED OF FELONIES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding after subchapter V the following:

``Subchapter VI--Mandatory Termination of Employment of Law Enforcement 
                                Officers

``Sec. 7551. Mandatory termination of employment of law enforcement 
              officers convicted of felonies
    ``(a) In this section, the term--
            ``(1) `conviction date' means the date on which a 
        conviction of a felony is entered by a Federal or State court, 
        regardless of whether that conviction is appealed or is subject 
        to appeal; and
            ``(2) `Federal law enforcement officer' has the meaning 
        given that term under section 115(c)(1) of title 18.
    ``(b) Any Federal law enforcement officer who is convicted of a 
felony shall be terminated from employment on the last day of the first 
applicable pay period following the conviction date.
    ``(c) This section does not prohibit the termination of employment 
before a conviction date.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding after 
the item relating to section 7543 the following:

``SUBCHAPTER VI--MANDATORY TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT 
                                OFFICERS

``7551. Mandatory termination of employment of law enforcement officers 
                            convicted of felonies.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of person privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group Developmental Biology Subcommittee.
    Date: June 10-11, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4d7dcd5dad3daf4d9d5ddd89adadddc9ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f0fbf2fdf4fdd3fef2faffbdfdfafbbdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 30, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-11072 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1996 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1996

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to clarify provisions relating 
 to the content of petitions for compensation under the vaccine injury 
                         compensation program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

    Section 2111(c)(1)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300aa-11(c)(1)(D)) is amended by striking ``and'' at the end and 
inserting ``or (iii) suffered such illness, disability, injury or 
condition from the vaccine which resulted in inpatient hospitalization 
and surgical intervention to correct such illness, disability, injury 
or condition, and''.

            Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1996

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to clarify provisions relating 
 to the content of petitions for compensation under the vaccine injury 
                         compensation program.
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Elamex, S.A. de C.V. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K/A for the year ended on December 31, 2004, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and to
      which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Sam L. Henry, the
      principal financial officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      January 6, 2006








*/S/
                Sam L. Henry*Sam
                L. HenrySenior
                Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.145


	

EXHIBIT 4.145




LEASE AMENDMENT #189093




LEASE AMENDMENT ("Agreement") made as of April 10, 2009 between NEVADA LAND AND RESOURCE COMPANY, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company (hereinafter "NLRC"), and NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER CO. (hereinafter Lessee").

RECITALS:




NLRC is the Lessor and NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER CO. is the Lessee under that certain Geothermal Lease, dated March 31, 2003 and designated in the files of NLRC as Contract No. 189093, relating to use of Premises situate in the County of Humboldt, State of Nevada, (the "Premises"). Said contract, together with any and all modifications, supplements and amendments thereto, whether or not referred to above, being hereinafter called the "Lease".




Lessor and Lessee desire to amend the aforementioned Lease, effective April 1, 2009, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.




AGREEMENT




1.

 The term of the Surface Purchase Option for Sections 1, 11 and 25, Township 36 North, Range 34 East, shall be extended to expire on December 31, 2010. If Lessee does not timely and properly exercise the Option on or before December 31, 2010, Lessee shall be deemed to have irrevocably released and waived the Option.


2.

 The Purchase Price for the Surface of Sections 1 and 11, Township 36 North, Range 34 East, MDB&M shall be ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($125.00) per acre, if close of escrow occurs between April 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009.


3.

 The Purchase Price for the Surface of Sections 1 and 11, Township 36 North, Range 34 East, MDB&M shall be ONE HUNDRED FIFTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($150.00) per acre, if close of escrow occurs between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010.


4.

 The Purchase Price for the Surface of Section 25, Township 36 North, Range 34 East, MDB&M shall be ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($175.00) per acre, if close of escrow occurs between April 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009.


5.

 The Purchase Price for the Surface of Section 25, Township 36 North, Range 34 East, MDB&M shall be TWO HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($200.00) per acre, if close of escrow occurs between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010.






Page 1 of 2



6.

Except as herein amended and supplemented, the Lease shall remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect as written.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, in duplicate, as of the day and year first written above.







		
	NEVADA LAND AND RESOURCE

	NEVADA GEOTHERMAL


	COMPANY, LLC

	POWER COMPANY


	By: signed

	By: signed


	Dorothy A. Timian-Palmer, President

	Brian D. Fairbank, President












Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUSTIN CAREY; et al.,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

WASHINGTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his official capacity of Governor of the State of Washington; DAVID SCHUMACHER, in his official capacity as Director of Washington State Office of Financial Management,

Defendants. No. 19

- 35290

D.C. No. 3:18

- cv

- 05208

- RBL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellants’ request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. 

# FILED

APR 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 35290

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Justin Carey, JoBeth Deibel, David Gaston, Roger Kinney, and Keith

Sanborn appeal from the district court’s summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C

.

§ 1983 putative class action alleging a First Amendment claim arising out of

compulsory agency fees (also known as fair share fees) paid to Washington

Education Association

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo

. Danielson v. Inslee , 945 F.3d 1096, 1 098 (9th Cir. 2019)

, cert. denied

,

No. 19

- 1130, 2021 WL 231555 (Jan. 25, 2021). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because a public

sector union can, as a matter of law, “invoke an affirmative defense of good faith

to retrosp ective monetary liability under section 1983 for the agency fees it

collected” prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. American Federation

of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 , 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018).

Danielson , 945 F.3d at 1097

- 99 (“[P] rivate parties may invoke an affirmative

defense of good faith to retrospective monetary liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

,

where they acted in direct reliance on then

- binding Supreme Court precedent and

presumptively

- valid state law.”) ; see also id. at 1102

- 03 ( finding plaintiffs’ claim

for monetary relief as damages, not restitution; “E ven accepting Plaintiffs’

restitutionary premise, the equities do not weigh in favor of requiring a refund of

all agency fees collected pre

- Janus

. ”)

.3 19

- 35290

We do not cons ider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.