alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 231

To provide for a special application of section 1034 of the Internal Revenue

Code of 1986.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide for a special application of section 1034 of the

Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in the case of Rita Bennington—

4 (1) who purchased her new principal residence

5 (within the meaning of section 1034 of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986) in January 1992, and

7 (2) who was unable to meet the requirements of

8 such section with respect to the sale of an old prin9 cipal residence until May 1994, because of unex10 pected delays caused by Hurricane Iniki,
2

•S 231 IS

1 the Secretary of the Treasury, in the administration of

2 section 1034 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, shall

3 apply subsection (a) of such section by substituting ‘‘2.5

4 years’’ for ‘‘2 years’’ each place it appears.

Æ
Exhibit 8.1  Subsidiaries of Registrant  Celestica Cayman Holdings 1 Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation;  Celestica Cayman Holdings 9 Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation;  Celestica European Holdings S.À.R.L., a Luxembourg corporation;  Celestica (Gibraltar) Limited, a Gibraltar corporation;  Celestica Holdings Pte Limited, a Singapore corporation;  Celestica Hong Kong Limited, a Hong Kong corporation;  Celestica LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;  Celestica Liquidity Management Hungary Limited Liability Company, a Hungary corporation;  Celestica (Luxembourg) S.À.R.L., a Luxembourg corporation  Celestica (Thailand) Limited, a Thailand corporation;  Celestica (USA) Inc., a Delaware corporation;  Celestica (US Holdings) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;  IMS International Manufacturing Services Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation;  1681714 Ontario Inc., an Ontario corporation;  1755630 Ontario Inc., an Ontario corporation; and  3250297 Nova Scotia Company (formerly 1282087 Ontario Inc.), a Nova Scotia corporation.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2



                                AMENDMENT NO. ONE
                                     TO THE
                            ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION
                                PERFORMANCE-BASED
                      SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE BENEFITS PLAN
                            EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1999


     WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.1 of the Atmos Energy
Corporation Performance-Based Supplemental Executive Benefits Plan (the "Plan"),
the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects as hereinafter
provided.

     NOW, THEREFORE, Atmos Energy Corporation does hereby amend the Plan,
effective as of January 1, 1999, as follows:

     1.   Section 2.1(i) is amended by adding the following at the end of clause
          (i) after the word "Division":

               "or any other employee selected by the Board of Directors in its
               discretion."


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO
THE ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION PERFORMANCE-BASED SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE BENEFITS
PLAN EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1999 to be executed in its name on its behalf this 1st
day of August, 2000, effective as of January 1, 1999.


                                              ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION


                                              By: /s/ ROBERT W. BEST
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                      Robert W. Best
                                                      Chairman of the Board,
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


ATTEST:

SHIRLEY A. HINES
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1


            CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Miin Wu, President of
Macronix International Co., Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his
knowledge, that:

1.       The Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
         31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
         and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date:  July 17, 2006


By:      /s/ Miin Wu
    ---------------------------
Name:    Miin Wu
Title:   Chairman and President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                    18,657
<RECEIVABLES>                                      962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,228
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              869
<BONDS>                                         18,924
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,393
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   976
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    24
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41376

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GORDON DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CR-122-7

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Gordon Davis appeals his conviction for conspiracy and

possession with intent to distribute marijuana. His argument

that the evidence was insufficient to prove his identity is

wholly unsupported by the record and is without merit because

identity was not an issue at trial. His argument regarding the

district court’s admission of testimony connecting him to a gun

is meritless. The admission of evidence tending to show the

existence of the conspiracy and the falsity of a defendant’s

version of events is not an abuse of discretion. See e.g., 
No. 97-41376

-2-

United States v. Walker, 710 F.2d 1062, 1066 (5th Cir. 1983). In

addition, such evidence is probably intrinsic to the offenses

charged, and therefore admissible. See United States v.

Ridlehuber, 11 F.3d 516, 522 (5th Cir. 1993). Similarly

meritless is Davis’ argument that the district court erred in

questioning a witness who was an informant about payment he

received from the government. The questions were aimed at

clarifying the informant’s proprietary interest in testifying,

and thus were not prejudicial. The district court did not

plainly err in questioning the witness. See United States v.

Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1569 (5th Cir. 1994). 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2118 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2118

 To amend title VIII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
   1964 to modify the computation of certain weighted student units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2000

  Mr. Crapo  (for himself and Mr. McConnell) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title VIII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
   1964 to modify the computation of certain weighted student units.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF WEIGHTED STUDENT UNITS.

    Section 8003(a)(2) (20 U.S.C. 7703(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (F);
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``subparagraphs (D) 
        and (E) of paragraph (1) by a factor of .10'' and inserting 
        ``subparagraph (D) of paragraph (1) by a factor of .25'';
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
                    ``(E) Multiply the number of children described in 
                subparagraph (E) of paragraph (1) by a factor of 
                .10.''; and
            (4) in subparagraph (F) (as redesignated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking ``.05'' and inserting ``.10''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter E. Simonsen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Beverly National
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

<PAGE>

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date: November 13, 2002
      -----------------


By:   /s/ Peter E. Simonsen
      -----------------------
      Chief Financial Officer
Deloitte &
 Touche LLP
       (logo)    Suite 1200                            Telephone: (714) 436-7100
                 695 Town Center Drive                 Facsimile: (714) 436-7200
                 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1924

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'REPORT



To American Savings Bank, F.A.

We have examined  management's  assertion  about American  Savings Bank,  F.A.'s
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKERS  (USAP) as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1996  included in the
accompanying  management  assertion.  Management  is  responsible  for  American
Savings Bank,  F.A.'s  compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test  basis,  evidence  about  American  Savings  Bank,  F.A.'s
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal  determination on American Savings Bank,  F.A.'s  compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that American Savings Bank, F.A. complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 14, 1997



DELOITTE TOUCHE
TOHMATSU
INTERNATIONAL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      11,180,089
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     132,761,082
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            13,200,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,218,711
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 11,153,903
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      24,650,317
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        24,453,803
<LOANS>                                    112,774,302
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,266,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             180,619,385
<DEPOSITS>                                 163,802,650
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,074,194
<LONG-TERM>                                    685,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,978,373
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,718,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             180,619,385
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,548,255
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,718,099
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               407,898
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,674,252
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,224,622
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,654
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,404,976
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,241,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,562,855
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,562,855
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,490,755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.76
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,792,654
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,072,523
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  504,390
<RECOVERIES>                                   698,645
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,266,778
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,417,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        849,778
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Mine Safety and Health Administration

                    This notice amends the petition for modification submitted by Lone Mountain Processing, Inc., on July 15, 2009, (Docket Number M-2009-024-C). The amendment assigns a separate docket number for each of the mines listed. Lone Mountain Processing, Inc., filed a petition for modification of existing standard 30 CFR 75.503 (Permissible electric face equipment; maintenance) and 30 CFR 18.35 (Portable trailing cables and cords) for the Clover Fork No. 1 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 15-18647), Huff Creek No. 1 Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 15-17234), and Darby Fork No. 1 Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 15-02263). MSHA published the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 21, 2009 (74 FR 67915). Initially, this petition for modification was assigned one docket number. After investigating these mines it has been determined that the conditions at the mines are different and a separate decision and order will be issued for each mine. This requires having separate docket numbers for each mine. A docket number is assigned for each of the mines as follows: (a) The Lone Mountain Processing, Inc., Clover Fork No. 1 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 15-18647), Docket No. M-2009-024-C; (b) Huff Creek No. 1 Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 15-17234), Docket No. M-2010-021-C; and (c) Darby Fork No. 1 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 15-02263), Docket No. M-2010-022-C. These mines are located in Harlan County, Kentucky.                

Patricia W. Silvey,

Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances. 

[FR Doc. 2010-11448 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P