alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARTS SOURCE INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,260,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,864,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,917,019
<PP&E>                                       3,236,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                 631,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,062,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,087,695
<BONDS>                                      5,853,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,412
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,950,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,062,002
<SALES>                                     26,755,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,755,921
<CGS>                                       17,060,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,102,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (31,545)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                95,555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             329,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                295,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            177,490
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   177,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
***Exhibit 31.2******CERTIFICATIONS***     I, Kenny D. Neal, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of First McMinnville Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.July 24, 2007        /s/ Kenny D. Neal   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, C. A. Rundell, Jr., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (this Report) of Integrated Security Systems, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  February 21, 2006

/s/ C. A. RUNDELL, JR.

C. A. Rundell, Jr.,

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Executive and Financial Officer
K-2 DIGITAL, INC. EXHIBIT 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Gary W. Brown, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of K-2 Digital, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2005

               /s/ GARY W. BROWN
               -----------------------------------------------------------------
                   GARY W. BROWN
                   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                   AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                   (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2353

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to improve the program for

American Indian Tribal Colleges and Universities under part A of title III.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 4, 2000

Mr. AKAKA (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. JOHNSON, and

Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to improve

the program for American Indian Tribal Colleges and

Universities under part A of title III.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATIONS FOR AND AWARD OF GRANTS.

4 (a) SIMPLIFICATION OF APPLICATIONS.—Sections

5 316(d)(2) and 317(d)(2) of the Higher Education Act of

6 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1059c(d)(2), 1059d(d)(2)) are each

7 amended by inserting after the first sentence the fol8 lowing: ‘‘Such regulations shall prescribe a simplified and

9 streamlined format for such applications that takes into
2

•S 2353 IS

1 account the limited number of institutions that are eligible

2 for assistance under this section.’’.

3 (b) SPECIAL RULES FOR AWARDS.—

4 (1) TRIBAL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.—

5 Section 316(d) of the Higher Education Act of 1965

6 (20 U.S.C. 1059c(d)) is further amended by striking

7 paragraph (3) and inserting the following:

8 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULES.—

9 ‘‘(A) ELIGIBILITY.—No Tribal College or

10 University that receives funds under this sec11 tion shall concurrently receive funds under

12 other provisions of this part or part B.

13 ‘‘(B) EXEMPTION.—Section 313(d) shall

14 not apply to grants under this section.

15 ‘‘(C) DISTRIBUTION.—In awarding grants

16 under this section, the Secretary shall, to the

17 extent possible, ensure maximum and equitable

18 distribution among all eligible institutions.’’.

19 (2) ALASKAN NATIVE AND NATIVE HAWAIIAN

20 INSTITUTIONS.—Section 317 of the Higher Edu21 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1059d) is further

22 amended by striking subsection (e) and by inserting

23 at the end of subsection (d) the following new para24 graph:

25 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULES.—
3

•S 2353 IS

1 ‘‘(A) ELIGIBILITY.—No Alaskan Native2 serving institution or Native Hawaiian-serving

3 institution that receives funds under this sec4 tion shall concurrently receive funds under

5 other provisions of this part or part B.

6 ‘‘(B) EXEMPTION.—Section 313(d) shall

7 not apply to grants under this section.

8 ‘‘(C) DISTRIBUTION.—In awarding grants

9 under this section, the Secretary shall, to the

10 extent possible, ensure maximum and equitable

11 distribution among all eligible institutions.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BIRMAN MANAGED CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,431,387
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  935,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                   130,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,592,381
<PP&E>                                       1,391,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                 287,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,835,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          783,107
<BONDS>                                        605,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,756
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,609,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,835,688
<SALES>                                      8,722,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,722,514
<CGS>                                        4,017,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,017,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,884,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,925,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   793,684
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,132,124)
<DISCONTINUED>                              (4,550,622)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,682,746)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83


</TABLE>
Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133885 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LATIF Z. ORAM, a/k/a RANDY Z. ORAM, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, and OB PROPERTIES LIMITED Justices PARTNERSHIP,

Plaintiffs/Counter-DefendantsAppellees, 

and 

OB PROPERTIES, and JAM SOUND

SPECIALISTS, INC.,

 Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants- 

 Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 133885 

 COA: 273162 

Oakland CC: 02-039499-CK 

JOHN ORAM and GARY ORAM,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-

 Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 

INTERNATIONAL OUTDOOR INC., VISION

PROPERTIES, DISCOUNT PAGING CO. INC., 

and FUTURE VISION PROPERTIES LLC, 

 Third Party Defendants, 

and 

HENRY CENDROWSKI, 

 Intervening Party-Appellee, 

and 

THAV, GROSS, STEINWAY & BENNETT PC, 

and ARMAND VELARDO, 

 Intervening Parties, 

and 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

ABBOTT NICHOLSON PC,

 Intervening Party-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. 

s0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-40,148-03

EX PARTE JULIO CESAR ESCAMILLA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 82-06 IN THE 25TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GONZALES COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

aggravated assault and sentenced to life imprisonment on each count. The Thirteenth Court of

Appeals affirmed his convictions. Escamilla v. State, No. 13-11-00727-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus

Christi–Edinburg Aug. 2, 2012).

Applicant contends, among other things, that appellate counsel rendered ineffective

assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed

and failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionary review.
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. Pursuant to Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use any means set

out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed and that he had

a right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also make any other

findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of

Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: November 4, 2015

Do not publish
463 A.2d 27

#### Commonwealth v. White, Appellant.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied June 12, 1984.

Submitted June 22, 1982.

Melvin B. Goldstein, for appellant; Michael Turner, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WICKERSHAM, McEWEN and LIPEZ, JJ.

*624The judgment of sentence of the learned Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court Judge Juanita Kidd Stout is affirmed.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 
| **NAME OF SUBSIDIARIES**   | ** ** | **JURISDICTION OF   INCORPORATION** | ** ** | **SUBSIDIARIES DOING   BUSINESS AS** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |       |                                     |       |                                           |
| StarTek   USA, Inc.             |       | Colorado                                 |       | StarTek   USA                                  |
|                                 |       |                                     |       | StarTek                                        |
|                                 |       |                                     |       | StarTek   Services                             |
|                                 |       |                                     |       |                                           |
| StarTek   Canada Services, Ltd. |       | Nova   Scotia, Canada                    |       | StarTek   Canada Services                      |
|                                 |       |                                     |       | StarTek                                        |
|                                 |       |                                     |       | StarTek   Services                             |
|                                 |       |                                     |       |                                           |
| StarTek   Holdings, Inc.        |       | Delaware                                 |       | StarTek   Holdings                             |
|                                 |       |                                     |       |                                           |
| StarTek   International, Limited     |       | Bermuda                                  |       | StarTek   International                        |
|                                 |       |                                     |       |                                           |
| StarTek   Pacific, Ltd.         |       | Colorado                                 |       | StarTek   Pacific                              |

 

----