alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than May 26, 2010.                          ( print page 26256)    

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis**                     (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480–0291:                

*1. Joyce J. Eickhoff Revocable Trust, and Joyce J. Eckhoff, Trustee*, both of Adrian, Minnesota; to acquire voting shares of Adrian Building Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Adrian State Bank, both of Adrian, Minnesota.                

**B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105–1579:                

*1. Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VI, L.P.; Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VI, L.P.; Thomas H. Lee Parallel (DT) Fund VI, L.P.; and THL Sterling Equity Investors, L.P.*, all of Boston, Massachusetts; to acquire voting shares of Sterling Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Sterling Savings Bank, both of Spokane, Washington, and Golf Savings Bank, Mountlake Terrace, Washington.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 6, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010–11113 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
Exhibit 10.1


 


May 20, 2009


 


Fossil, Inc.


Attn: Tom Kartsotis


2280 N. Greenville Avenue

Richardson, TX 75082


 


	
  Re:

  	
   

  	
  Acceptance to Serve as an
  Advisory Director and Election to Decline Participation in the
  Fossil, Inc. 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan

  



 


Dear Randy:


 


This letter is to serve as
my acceptance of the position as “Advisory Director” to Fossil, Inc. (the “Company”)
for a term of one (1) year, to expire on May 19, 2010.


 


I understand that by serving
as an Advisory Director, I will remain an “outside director” for purposes of
the Fossil, Inc. 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and a “nonemployee
director” for purposes of the Fossil, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (the “1999
Plan”), and that I have not suffered a termination of service for purposes of
the 2008 Plan and 1999 Plan.  In
addition, I understand that all of the outstanding stock options granted to me,
as of the date hereof, will continue to remain in effect as the option
agreements are written.


 


Lastly, this letter serves
as my election to decline participation in the 2008 Plan.  I understand and agree that by declining to
participate in the 2008 Plan I shall not be entitled to any further annual
automatic director grants made pursuant to the 2008 Plan that would otherwise
be available to me as an outside director of the Company.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Kenneth W. Anderson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Kenneth W. Anderson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Tom Kartsotis

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  Tom Kartsotis

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Chairman
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of B&D Food Corp. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Spence
Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 19, 2009By:
                /s/
      Spence
      WalkerSpence
      WalkerChief
      Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.23     M E M O R A N D U M  TO:
  Andy CahillFROM:
  Gary
  GreenfieldDATE:
  April 21,
  2003SUBJECT:
  Severance
  Agreement   In recognition of the current
challenges facing Peregrine Systems and the role you are expected to play in
achieving aggressive targets and maintaining a positive work environment in the
Field Operations group, you will be provided with severance protection, in the
gross amount of $300,000 if you are terminated by the company for reasons other
than for cause prior to June 8, 2004. 
This payment is in addition to the amount provided under the Key
Employee Severance Plan (KESP).  Approved:Gary
  Greenfield
  
  DateAccepted and
  Agreed:Andy Cahill
  
  Date
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2176 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2176

                    To reliquidate certain entries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

Mr. Thompson (for himself and Mr. Frist) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    To reliquidate certain entries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1.  LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514), or any other provision of law, the Customs 
Service shall--
            (1) not later than 90 days after receiving a request 
        described in subsection (b), liquidate or reliquidate the 
        entries listed in subsection (c); and
            (2) within 90 days after such liquidation or reliquidation, 
        refund any duties paid with respect to such entries in excess 
        of the deposit rate, including interest thereon.
    (b) Requests.--Reliquidation may be made under subsection (a) with 
respect to an entry described in subsection (c) only if a request 
therefore is filed with the Customs Service within 90 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Entries.--The entries referred to in subsection (a) are as 
follows:

 
           Entry Number                         Date of Entry
 
  W4442016446.....................  August 20, 1997
  W4442018301.....................  January 23, 1998
  W4442015653.....................  July 1, 1997
  W4442014334.....................  March 28, 1997
  W4442015240.....................  May 20, 1997
  W4442015232.....................  May 20, 1997
  W4442014797.....................  April 28, 1997
  W4442017196.....................  October 13, 1997
 

                                 <all>
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2209

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,6 dichlorotoluene.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7, 2000

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,6 dichlorotoluene.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2,6 DICHLOROTOLUENE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.28.08 2,6

Dichlorotoluene

(CAS No. 118–

69–4) (provided

for in subheading

2903.69.70) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•S 2209 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 1,726.

#### STATE ex rel. MILES FINLEN, Relator, *v.*DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Defendant.

Original application for a writ of supervisory control.

' *Messrs. Forbis & Evans, Mr. T. J.*Walsh, and *Mr. J. E. MacDonald^*for Relator.

Decided October 10, 1901.

Per Curiam.

— Relator’s application for a writ of supervisory control herein is denied.

(Mr. Justice Pigott is of the opinion that the application should be set for hearing, and therefore dissents from this order.)

On petition for reheating.

Decided October 22, 1902.

Per Curiam.

— The petition for a reheating herein is denied. (Mr. Justice Milburn concurring upon the ground that the petition does not state facts sufficient to warrant the issuance of the writ prayed for. Mr. Justice Pigott is of the opinion that the application for a writ of supervisory control should be heard, and therefore dissents from the order denying the motion for a reconsideration.)
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of B&D Food Corp. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Daniel
Ollech, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 19, 2009By:
                /s/
      Daniel OllechDaniel
      OllechChief
      Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0364

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SHANE MEDORE MAGGI,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 2, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 27 2022

12/27/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0364
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2207

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclohexadec-8-en-1-one (CHD).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7, 2000

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclohexadec-8-en-1-

one (CHD).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CYCLOHEXADEC-8-EN-1-ONE (CHD).

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.28.13 Cyclohexadec-8-

en-1-one (CHD)

(provided for in

subheading

2914.29.00) ....... Free Free No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•S 2207 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20717

FORUM SUBSEA RENTALS, formerly known as DPS Offshore, Incorporated,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

TAREK A. ELSHARHAWY; SHELLY L. ELSHARHAWY, also known as Shelly L. Chilman; GLOBALTECH OFFSHORE,

Defendants

- Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CV

- 885

Before PRADO, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *

This court has considered this appeal on the basis of the briefs, the oral

arguments of counsel, and pertinent portions of the record. The judgment of

the district court is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the dist rict

court in its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of L aw issued on September 17,

2014

, after the bench trial.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 22, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20717 Document: 00513353469 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2016No. 14

- 20717

2 AFFIRMED. Case: 14-20717 Document: 00513353469 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2016
#### BISHOP & BABCOCK CO. v. SCHLEUNING et al.

A. foreign corporation, which has failed to comply with Rev. Civ. Code, § 883, requiring such a corporation to file in the office of the Secretary of State an authenticated copy of its charter as a condition of doing business in the state or maintaining actions in its courts, cannot sue in the courts of the state until it does comply therewith.

(Opinion filed, Nov. 1, 1905.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pennington County. Hon. E®vi McGkR, Judge.

*72Action by the Bishop & Babcock Company against Adeline Schleuning and others, co-partners as Sclileuning & Co. From judgment for defendants, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*Chauncey L,. Wood,*for appellant. *Buell*& *Gardner,*for respondents.

CORSON, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered upon a verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant, directed by the court.

Plaintiff in its brief says: “It is admitted that the plaintiff is an Ohio corporation and has not complied with Chapter 47, p. 52, of the Session Raws of 1895 (section 883, Rev. Civ. Code), and has not appointed a resident agent in the state of South Dakota, and that plaintiff is not a religious or charitable corporation. The defendants by their counsel then moved the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff on all the issues, for the reason that the plaintiff had not complied with the foreign corporation law and for that reason could not maintain an action. The motion was granted by the court, and the jury instructed to return a verdict in favor of the defendants.” It will thus be seen by the statements of counsel for appellant that the same question is presented in this case as was. presented in the cases of Bradley, Metcalf & Co. v. Armstrong, 9 S. D. 267, 68 N. W. 733, and Iowa Falls Mfg. Co. v. Farrar, 19 S. D. 632, 104 N. W. 449, in which this court held that a foreign corporation that had failed to comply with the laws of this state could not maintain an action in its courts until it had so complied with the laws of the state. See, also* Thompson & Juve v. Scroyer et al, 20 S. D. 72, 104 N. W. 854. Following these decisions, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

The judgment of the circuit court and order denying a new trial are affirmed.
No. 3,637.

#### C. L. HALVERSON, Respondent, *v.*CHAS. GREENWOOD et al., Appellants.

*Appeal from, District Court of Chouteau County.*

Decided March 9, 1915.

*Mr. E. D.*Ewrnden, for Respondent.'

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal herein for laches is, after due consideration by the court, granted and the appeal is dismissed accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains certain summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements and notes thereto and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.  The Company files an unclassified
balance sheet, certain line items are not applicable.  All values except share
amounts are in thousands.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         207,573
<SECURITIES>                                    28,385
<RECEIVABLES>                                  676,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          66,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,057,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         22,002
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        854
<COMMON>                                         8,337
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,057,077
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,738,806
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,695,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,289
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        

</TABLE>
Dismiss and Opinion Filed January 26, 2021

In the

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00239-CV

ANGELOS KOLOBOTOS, A/K/A 

ANGELOS KOLOMBOTOS, A/K/A 

ANGELOS KOLOBOTAS, A/K/A 

ANGELOS KOLMBOTOS, A/K/A 

ANGELOS KOLOBETOS, AKA 

ANGELOS KOLOBOPOS, D/B/A 

STAMATINA HOLDINGS, LLC, D/B/A 

SOLEGNA HOLDINGS LLC

AND KOLOBOTOS PROPERTIES, LLC D/B/A

KOLOBOTOS PROPERTY LLC, D/B/A 

KOLOBOTOS PPTIES LLC, Appellants

V.

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-16384

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

On December 16, 2020, after appellants failed to file their brief, we directed 

appellants to file the brief within ten days and cautioned them that failure to comply 

would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P.
–2–

38.8(a)(1). To date, the brief has not been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

200239F.P05

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ANGELOS KOLOBOTOS, AKA 

ANGELOS KOLOMBOTOS, AKA 

ANGELOS KOLOBOTAS, AKA 

ANGELOS KOLMBOTOS, AKA, 

ANGELOS KOLOBETOS, AKA 

ANGELOS KOLOBOPOS, D/B/A 

STAMATINA HOLDINGS LLC, 

D/B/A SOLEGNA HOLDINGS 

LLC, AND KOLOBOTOS 

PROPERTIES, LLC, D/B/A 

KOLOBOTOS PROPERTY LLC, 

D/B/A KOLOBOTOS PPTIES LLC, 

Appellants

No. 05-20-00239-CV V.

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-16384.

Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle, 

Justices Myers and Osborne 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee City of Dallas recover its costs, if any, of this appeal 

from appellants Angelos Kolobotos, AKA Angelos Kolombotos, AKA Angelos 

Kolobotas, AKA Angelos Kolmbotos, AKA, Angelos Kolobetos, AKA Angelos 

Kolobopos, D/B/A Stamatina Holdings LLC, D/B/A Solegna Holdings LLC, and 

Kolobotos Properties, LLC, D/B/A Kolobotos Property LLC, D/B/A Kolobotos 

Ppties LLC.
–4–

Judgment entered this 26th day of January, 2021.
EXHIBIT 32.2**Certification**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Bowater Incorporated (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.   Dated: November 9, 2007 /s/ William G. Harvey     Name: William G. Harvey