alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26976-26977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1906-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1906-DR), dated April 29, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 5, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of April 29, 2010.

    Issaquena County for Public Assistance, including direct Federal 
assistance.
    Monroe and Warren Counties for Public Assistance, including 
direct Federal assistance, (already designated for Individual 
Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

[[Page 26977]]

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant).

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-11500 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 22-20642 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Michael Deblasio, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:19-CR-457-1 

______________________________ 

Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Deblasio has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Deblasio has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to 

allow us to make a fair evaluation of Deblasio’s claims of ineffective 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

August 1, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-20642 Document: 00516842726 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2023
No. 22-20642 

2 

assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without 

prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 

(5th Cir. 2014). 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Deblasio’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, 

Deblasio’s motion for an extension to find and retain an attorney is 

DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 22-20642 Document: 00516842726 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/01/2023
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-05-00117- CV
Atlin Construction, LLC an d Robert M cMast er, A ppellan ts
v. WW Contrac tors, Inc., Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 201ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. GN401806 , HO NORAB LE SUZ ANNE COVINGTO N, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants A t l i n C onstruction, L L C, and Robert McMa ster inform this Court that they and appellee WW Contractors, I nc., ag ree that this a ppeal should be mediated. Appellants have filed an unopposed m otion to abate to suspend t he running of appellate deadlines while the par ties mediate. We a

bate this a ppeal until June 6, 2005. The par ties are direc ted to inform the Court of the status of the a

ppeal by that date. B arr ing f

urther or der of

the Court, the appeal wi ll be reinstated on June 6.

Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces B . A. Smith and Pemberton Filed: Apr il 14, 2005
#### Sellent-Repent Corp., Plaintiff, *v.*Queens Borough Gas and Electric Company and Others, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

October 13, 1936.

*Sellent-Repent Corp.,*plaintiff in person.

*J. Donald Whelehan [Samuel C. Whitman*of counsel], for the defendant Anola Dewitt Johnston.

Beoweb, J.

This is a motion to cancel a notice of pendency of this action and to dismiss the complaint as against the moving defendant. Plaintiff is a domestic corporation and is not represented in this action by an attorney at law, the summons and complaint being subscribed in its corporate name as appearing in person. The sole ground on which movant relies on this motion is that a corporation cannot prosecute or defend an action in person, but must appear by an attorney duly licensed to practice.

The question seems not to have been passed upon in this State. *A. B. C. Steel Equipment Co., Inc.,*v. *Schreiber Co., Inc.*(150 Misc. 124), cited by defendant, was decided upon other grounds. Defendant relies upon section 236 of the Civil Practice Act and *MullinJohnson Co.*v. *Penn. Mutual Life*(9 Fed. Supp. 175), decided in California, where in passing upon the provisions of section 394 of title 28 of the United States Code, a Federal statute quite similar. to section 236 of the Civil Practice Act, and in which parties are permitted to plead and manage their own cases in person, it was held: “ Since a corporation cannot practice law, and can only act through the agency of actual persons, it follows that it can appear in court on its own behalf only through a licensed attorney.”

The right of a corporation to sue and be sued upon an equal footing with natural persons has long been recognized. *(Thomas*v. *921
      *Dakin,*22 Wend. 9, 70; *LaFarge*v. *Exchange Fire Ins. Co.,*22 N. Y. 352; State Const, art. 8, § 3.) When acting for a person other than itself, it is made unlawful for a corporation to practice law or appear as an attorney at law. (Penal Law, § 280.)

Defendant has failed to note the distinction between a corporate act performed by a person employed to act as its agent and attorney, and a like act done by the corporation through its own administrative officers. A corporation is a legal entity, often spoken of as an artificial person and by the same fiction like a natural body having power to act and reason. A corporation may employ an agent or attorney to act on its behalf in the same manner as a natural person, but the act of the corporate officer in employing an agent is the act of the corporation. The officers of a corporation are the vehicle and conduit by and through which it is given being and from which the power to act and reason springs. A wide difference exists between acting for oneself by an inherent faculty, and the employment of another person to act for and in one's stead. When a corporation does not go outside its own corporate machinery in the performance of a corporate act, it is acting in person and upon an equal footing with a natural person, including the right to sue in person.

Motion denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

(No. 1.)

Interlocutory judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, with usual leave to plaintiff to amend complaint upon payment of costs of demurrer and of this appeal.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2005

To repeal the modification of the installment method.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26, 2000

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. GRAMS, and Mr.

ALLARD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To repeal the modification of the installment method.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MODIFICATION OF INSTALLMENT

4 METHOD.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 536 of the Ticket to Work

6 and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 (relating

7 to modification of installment method and repeal of in8 stallment method for accrual method taxpayers) is re9 pealed effective with respect to sales and other dispositions

10 occurring on or after the date of the enactment of such

11 Act.
2

•S 2005 IS

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The Internal Revenue Code of

2 1986 shall be applied and administered as if that section

3 (and the amendments made by that section) had not been

4 enacted.

Æ
Order filed January 20, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-21-00145-CR

__________

DANIEL RAY GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 106th District Court

Gaines County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-5086

O R D E R

This appeal has become stalled due to the failure of Cara B. McLeod, the court 

reporter for the 106th District Court, to prepare and file in this court the reporter’s 

record, which was originally due on October 20, 2021. The appellant, who 

represents himself in this appeal, has filed motions complaining of the delay in the 

filing of the reporter’s record, and he has also filed other motions in this court that 

require this court to review portions of the reporter’s record. 
2

McLeod filed three prior requests for an extension of time to file the reporter’s 

record in this case. When we granted her third request on December 20, 2021, we

directed that the reporter’s record be filed on or before January 18, 2022. McLeod 

has now filed her fourth request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. 

In her recent request, McLeod states that she and family members currently have 

COVID. She also indicates that the reporter’s record is expected to be approximately 

2,500 pages and cover seven days of testimony. Given the extenuating 

circumstances in this case, we grant McLeod’s fourth request for extension. We 

note, however, that we are not inclined to consider any further extensions from 

McLeod in this case. 

By this order, Cara B. McLeod is ORDERED to file the reporter’s record 

in this cause on or before 3:00 p.m. on February 17, 2022. If the reporter’s record 

has not been filed in this court by 3:00 p.m. on February 17, 2022, McLeod is ordered 

to appear in person at that time in the courtroom of the Eleventh Court of Appeals

in Eastland, Texas, to explain the delay. 

PER CURIAM

January 20, 2022

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Willows, California. Agenda items covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approve Minutes, (3) RAC Admin Updates, (4) Public Comment, (5) FY08 and FY09 New Project Presentations and Voting if Time Allows, (6) FY10 New Project Presentations and Voting if Time Allows, (7) General Discussion, (8) Meeting Schedule, (9) Adjourn.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on May 24, 2010, from 1:30 p.m. and end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. Individuals who wish to speak or propose agenda items send their names and proposals to Eduardo Olmedo, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988 or Laurie Trombley, Glenn/Colusa RAC Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 160, Stonyford, CA 95979.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Laurie Trombley, Glenn/Colusa RAC Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 160, Stonyford, CA 95979 (530) 963-3128, e-mail:                         *ltrombley@fs.fed.us;*                         Eduardo Olmedo, District Ranger, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. Humboldt St., Willows, CA 95988 (503) 934-3316, e-mail:                         *eolmedo@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee will file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions are provided and individuals who made written requests by May 17, 2010 have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Dated: May 4, 2010.

Eduardo Olmedo,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 2010-11268 Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2193

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Blue 60.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7, 2000

Mr. EDWARDS (for himself and Mr. HELMS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Blue 60.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON PIG4 MENT BLUE 60.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.00 Pigment Blue 60

(CAS No. 81–

77–6) (provided

for in subheading

3204.17.90) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.
2

•S 2193 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**Exhibit 12.1****EXHIBIT 12.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Miin Wu, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Macronix International Co., Ltd.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the company and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date: July 2, 2007           By:
#### CHARLES CRAWSON, Appellant, v. MIDDLEWEST GRAIN COMPANY, a Corporation, and H. T. Hogy, Respondents.

(173 N. W. 475.)

This case is governed by the decision in Kluver v. Middlewest Grain Co. ante, 210.

Opinion filed June 21, 1919.

From an order of the District Court of Ward County, *Leighton,*J., plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*W. H. Sibbald,*for appellant.

*Fiske & Murphy,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

This case was submitted together with Kluver v. Middlewest Grain Co. ante, 210, 173 N. W. 468. The facts in the *249instant case are identical with those in the Kluver Case, and on the authority of the decision rendered in that case, the order appealed from is affirmed.

Grace, J., concurs in the result.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 14, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 14, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0435. COASTAL HOME CARE et al. v. EVELYN FANN-ROBERTS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SPCV2200382
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      21,552,627
<SECURITIES>                                   138,317
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,114,453
<PP&E>                                       4,197,954
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,650,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,426,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,570,333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          947,605
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,867
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,993,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,426,365
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               696,012
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,828,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,814,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,084,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,084,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,084,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.55)
        

</TABLE>