alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-38635, 333-68229, 333-93663, 333-42192, 333-39026, 333-67716 and 333-84556
of Hall Kinion & Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report
dated March 26, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
an explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of a new accounting principle)
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hall, Kinion & Associates, Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 29, 2002.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
March 26, 2003
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Omega Ventures Group, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
      30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the *"Report"*), the undersigned, John Rask, Principal Financial Officer
      of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934;
      and





(2)
      The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      result of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
              14, 2007
            By:
            John
              RaskJohn
              Rask, Principal
              Financial Officer
Amendment No. 1 to Development, Commercialization and Licensing Agreement



 Exhibit 10.12 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIALIZATION AND LICENSING AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIALIZATION AND LICENSING AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and effective as of May 14, 2007, by and between Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (“LabCorp”) and ARCA Discovery, Inc.
(“ARCA”). 
 WHEREAS, LabCorp and ARCA entered into a Development, Commercialization and Licensing Agreement dated
February 1, 2007 (the “License Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the terms of the License
Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants of the parties and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, LabCorp and ARCA agree to the following amendments to the License Agreement: 
 1. Sections 2.6 and 2.8 of the License Agreement are hereby amended by deleting the words “ninety (90) days” in each such section and replacing such words with “one hundred eighty (180) days. 
 2. Except as expressly herein amended, the terms and conditions of the License Agreement as existed prior to this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. This
Amendment shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Delaware. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LabCorp and ARCA have
caused this Amendment to be executed, by the duly authorized officers of each party, on the dates shown below. 
  

									
	ARCA Discovery, Inc.	 		 	Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
					
	By:	 	/s/ Christopher Ozeroff	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Bradford T. Smith


									
	Name:	 	Christopher Ozeroff	 		 	Name:	 	Bradford T. Smith
	Title:	 	EVP Bus. Dev. & GC	 		 	Title:	 	Executive Vice President
	Date:	 	May 14, 2007	 		 	Date:	 	May 18, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,234
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,681
<PP&E>                                         595,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 500,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,193,783
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   500,585
<SALES>                                         15,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,446
<CGS>                                           22,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               610,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (547,276)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (547,276)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (547,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (547,276)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, I, the undersigned
Chief  Financial Officer of American Ecology Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify,  based  on  my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for  the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and  that  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James R. Baumgardner
------------------------
James R. Baumgardner
November 12, 2003


<PAGE>
Exhibit 4.143




Exhibit 4.143




Humboldt County

Assessor's Parcel No. N/A -unpatented mining claims Recorded at the request of

And when recorded return to:

Desert Valley Gold Co.

Suite 900-409 Granville St.

Vancouver, B.C. V6C 1C2

The undersigned affirms that this instrument does 

Not contain the social security number of any person.



Quitclaim Deed 

(Blue Claims)




Nevada Eagle Resources LLC ("Grantor") quitclaims to Desert Valley Gold ("Grantee") and its successors and assigns forever, all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the unpatented mining claims situated in Humboldt County, Nevada, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached to and by this reference incorporated in this Quitclaim Deed.




		
	April  1st , 2009

	Signed


	 
	John L. Key













		
	STATE OF NEVADA,

	)

ss.


	COUNTY OF WASHOE

	)







 

 

 

This Quitclaim Deed was acknowledged before me on April 1st   2009  by John L. Key




		
	
   
	Signed


	Caren M. Idzinga






















			
	 

	Exhibit A
	 

	 
	Blue Claims

Humboldt County, Nevada

	 

	Blue Mountain Project Name
	BLM Serial number
	County document


	Blue 1 through Blue 10

	NMC 1001318-1001327

	2008-9784 through 2008-9793


	Blue 11 through Blue 27

	NMC 1003767-1003783

	2009-498 through 2009-514


	Blue 48,62,63 and 64

	NMC 1003784-1003787

	2009-515 through 2009-518


	(31 total claims-Humboldt)
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2245

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to modify

the article description with respect to certain hand-woven fabrics.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9, 2000

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to modify the article description with respect to

certain hand-woven fabrics.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HAND-WOVEN FABRICS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subheadings 5111.11.30 and

5 5111.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

6 United States are amended by striking ‘‘, with a loom

7 width of less than 76 cm’’ each place it appears and insert8 ing ‘‘yarns of different colors’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or
2

•S 2245 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

2 the 30th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUSTIN CAREY; et al., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

WASHINGTON EDUCATION 

ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his official 

capacity of Governor of the State of 

Washington; DAVID SCHUMACHER, in 

his official capacity as Director of 

Washington State Office of Financial 

Management, 

Defendants.

No. 19-35290 

D.C. No. 3:18-cv-05208-RBL 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellants’ request for oral 

argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.

FILED

APR 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 19-35290 

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. 

Justin Carey, JoBeth Deibel, David Gaston, Roger Kinney, and Keith 

Sanborn appeal from the district court’s summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 putative class action alleging a First Amendment claim arising out of

compulsory agency fees (also known as fair share fees) paid to Washington 

Education Association. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

de novo. Danielson v. Inslee, 945 F.3d 1096, 1098 (9th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 

No. 19-1130, 2021 WL 231555 (Jan. 25, 2021). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because a public 

sector union can, as a matter of law, “invoke an affirmative defense of good faith 

to retrospective monetary liability under section 1983 for the agency fees it 

collected” prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. American Federation 

of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018).

Danielson, 945 F.3d at 1097-99 (“[P]rivate parties may invoke an affirmative 

defense of good faith to retrospective monetary liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 

where they acted in direct reliance on then-binding Supreme Court precedent and 

presumptively-valid state law.”); see also id. at 1102-03 (finding plaintiffs’ claim 

for monetary relief as damages, not restitution; “Even accepting Plaintiffs’ 

restitutionary premise, the equities do not weigh in favor of requiring a refund of 

all agency fees collected pre-Janus.”).
 3 19-35290 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 4.1



 Exhibit 4.1

	
				
				
				
			
	INCOPORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA                          SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIIONS
	
			
	
				
				
			
	
				
			
	FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.001 VALUE PER SHARE, OF
	
			
	
				
			
	transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Nevada, and to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now in effect or as hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
	
			
	
				
				
				
				
			
	
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
















The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:





					
	TEN COM - as tenants in common

	 
	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -

	....................Custodian....................


	TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties

	 
	 
	(Cust)

	(Minor)


	JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of

	 
	 
	under Uniform Gifts to Minors


	survivorship and not as tenants

	 
	 
	 

	in common

	 
	 
	Act....................


	 
	 
	 
	(State)


	 
	 
	 
	 









Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.







For Value Received,                        hereby sell, assign and transfer unto




	
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


	 









		
	 

	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)


	 

	 

	 

	 

	 
	Shares of the


	stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


	 

	 

	 
	Attorney to 


	transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.







		
	Dated

	 










		
	 
	 

	 
	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.










		
	Signature(s) Guaranteed


	 

	By

	 

	The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC Rule 17Ad-15.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Beverly National Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), we, Donat A. Fournier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael O. Gilles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Donat A. Fournier  
|    |  | Donat A. Fournier      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    | 
|    |  | May 13, 2008           
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Michael O. Gilles  
|    |  | Michael O. Gilles      
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    | 
|    |  | May 13, 2008           

The foregoing certificate is furnished solely for purposes of complying with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any of the Companys previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the Companys future filings, including this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Sharon Doherty, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this Report) of Integrated Security Systems, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:   February 11, 2010



/s/ SHARON DOHERTY

Sharon Doherty

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

May 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00057

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.A.A., a child,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006

- CI

- 17882 Honorable Jan et P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On May 22, 2015, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel in t his appeal. However, the motion filed by counsel fails to substantially comply with all of the requirements of Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Rule 6.5 (a) requires that a motion to withdraw contain (1) a list of current deadlines and setting s in the case [ Rule 6.5(a)(1) ] ; (2) the party’s telephone number [Rule 6.5(a)(2)] ; and (3) a statement that the party was notifi ed in writing of the right to object to the motion [ Rule 6.5(a)(4) ]

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(a). The motion filed by counsel fails to contain the above

- mentioned items. Additionally, Rule 6.5(b) requires that a motion to withdraw be delivered to the party in p erson or mailed

— both by certified and first

- class mail

— to the party at the party’s last known address. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(b). The motion to withdraw filed by counsel does not show that this requirement has been satisfied . For these reasons, counsel’s moti on to withdraw is DENIED without prejudice.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m y hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
#### MANTLE, Appellant, *v.*LARGEY, Respondent.

[Submitted October 24, 1894.

Decided November 8, 1894.]

*Appeal*— Notice—Service.—'The particular provision of section 422 of the Code of Civil Procedure permitting service of a notice of appeal “ on the adverse party or his attorney” prevails over the general provision of section 492 that, in all cases where the party has an attorney, the service of papers shall be upon the attorney instead of the party, and in such case service of the notice upon the respondent personally is sufficient.

*Appeal from, Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

*F. T. McBride,*for the motion.

*Corbett & Wellcome, Contra.*

Per Curiam.

— Eespondent moves the dismissal of this appeal, because the notice of appeal was not served on respondent’s attorney of record in the action, but instead was served on respondent personally.

Section 492 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that: *“*In all cases where the party has an attorney in the action or proceeding the service of papers, when required, shall be upon the attorney instead of the party, except of subpoenas, writs, and other process issued in the suit, and of papers to bring him into contempt.”

But as to service of notice of appeal there is a special provision of statute to the effect that the notice shall be served “on the adverse party or his attorney.” (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 422.)

A familiar rule of construction is, that, when a general and particular provision of statute are inconsistent, the particular provision will prevail, and this rule of construction is incorporated in the Code of Civil Procedure by the provisions of section 631.

Therefore, in our judgment, the particular provision of section 422, relating especially to the service of the notice of appeal, and providing that service thereof may be made on the *117adverse party personally, or on bis attorney, would make the service in this case of notice of appeal on respondent sufficient." Motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

All concurred.