alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1972

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to the town of Dolores,

Colorado, the current site of the Joe Rowell Park.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Mr. ALLARD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to the town

of Dolores, Colorado, the current site of the Joe Rowell

Park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF JOE ROWELL PARK.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture shall

5 convey to the town of Dolores, Colorado, for no consider6 ation, all right, title, and interest of the United States in

7 and to the parcel of real property described in subsection

8 (b), for open space, park, and recreational purposes.

9 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—
2

•S 1972 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The property referred to in

2 subsection (a) is a parcel of approximately 25 acres

3 of land comprising the site of the Joe Rowell Park

4 (including all improvements on the land and equip5 ment and other items of personal property as agreed

6 to by the Secretary) in section 16 (Map 1), township

7 37 north, range 15 west, NMPM, Dolores, Colorado.

8 (2) SURVEY.—

9 (A) IN GENERAL.—The exact acreage and

10 legal description of the property to be conveyed

11 under subsection (a) shall be determined by a

12 survey satisfactory to the Secretary.

13 (B) COST.—As a condition of any convey14 ance under this section, the town of Dolores

15 shall pay the cost of the survey.

16 (c) POSSIBILITY OF REVERTER.—Title to any real

17 property acquired by the town of Dolores, Colorado, under

18 this section shall revert to the United States if the town—

19 (1) attempts to convey or otherwise transfer

20 ownership of any portion of the property to any

21 other person;

22 (2) attempts to encumber the title of the prop23 erty; or

24 (3) permits the use of any portion of the prop25 erty for any purpose incompatible with the purpose
3

•S 1972 IS

1 described in subsection (a) for which the property is

2 conveyed.

Æ
#### Commonwealth *v.*Crowley.

October 9, 1905:

*Appeals*— Criminal *law*— Death *of defendant*— Abatement *of appeal.*

Where a defendant in a criminal case dies pending his appeal to a higher court, the appeal is abated.

Appeal No. 2, March T., 1905, by Michael Crawley, from judgment of Q. S. Clinton Co., on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Michael Crowley.

Appeal abated.

From the record it appeared that after the appeal was taken the appellant died.

*R. B. McCormick*and *W. C. Kress,*for the commonwealth.

The appeal abated on the death of the defendant: O’Sullivan v. People of Illinois, 144 Ill. 604 (32 N. E. Repr. 192); State v. Perrine, 56 Mo. 602; Pustiofsky v. State, 28 S. W. Repr. *947;*Hardin v. State, 36 S. *W.*Repr. *82;*Harrington v. State, 53 Ga. 552; Hale v. Com. 71 S. W. Repr. 902; State v. Martin, 30 Oregon, 108 (47 Pac. Repr. 196).

Pee Curiam,

This appeal was argued on March 7, 1905, and was held under advisement. Before a decision was rendered, it was shown to us, by suggestion of the district attorney in writing, duly filed, that the appellant died on or about March 13,1905. It is clear, both upon reason and authority, that under such circumstances, the appeal abates and that nothing remains for the appellate court to do but to make the formal order to that effect.

Now October 9, 1905, the appeal is abated.
##### 



First Amendment to the
Bowater Incorporated
Outside Directors Stock-Based Deferred Fee Plan
Effective as of May 11, 2005
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
  Eligibility
  (b)
    
    Each Outside Director whose benefits under the Bowater Incorporated Retirement
Plan for Outside Directors (the Retirement Plan) were frozen as of May 11, 2005
pursuant to the Retirement Plans terms shall have the present value of his Retirement
Plan benefit converted into Stock Units and credited to his Deferred Retainer Account
as of August 31, 2006. The number of Stock Units to be credited to each Outside
Directors Deferred Retainer Account shall be determined by (i) calculating the present
value of such individuals frozen retirement benefit as of August 31, 2006 using a 7%
interest rate, the 1994 Group Annuity Mortality Table blended 50% for males and 50% for
females and an assumed retirement age of 72, and (ii) dividing such resulting value by
the Fair Market Value of a Share of stock on August 31, 2006.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF th
 BOWATER INCORPORATEDBy:
    
    /s/ James T. WrightJames T. Wright
Executive Vice President  Human Resources
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Westbank Corporation (the "Corporation") does hereby
certify to such officer's knowledge that:


     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of
     the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
     the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
     condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Date:  August 6, 2004                     /s/ John M. Lilly
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          John M. Lilly
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Westbank
Corporation and will be retained by Westbank Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2141

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade

relations treatment) to the products of Georgia.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(normal trade relations treatment) to the products of

Georgia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 Congress makes the following findings:

5 (1) Georgia has been found to be in full compli6 ance with the freedom of emigration requirements

7 under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974.

8 (2) Since its independence from the Soviet

9 Union in 1991, Georgia has made great progress to-
2

•S 2141 IS

1 ward democratic rule and toward creating a free2 market economy system.

3 (3) Georgia concluded a bilateral investment

4 treaty with the United States in 1994.

5 (4) Georgia has demonstrated a strong desire to

6 build a friendly and cooperative relationship with the

7 United States.

8 (5) The extension of unconditional normal trade

9 relations treatment to the products of Georgia will

10 enable the United States to avail itself of all rights

11 under the World Trade Organization with respect to

12 Georgia.

13 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF

14 THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO GEORGIA.

15 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN16 SIONS OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith17 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974

18 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may—

19 (1) determine that such title should no longer

20 apply to Georgia; and

21 (2) after making a determination under para22 graph (1) with respect to Georgia, proclaim the ex23 tension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal

24 trade relations treatment) to the products of that

25 country.
3

•S 2141 IS

1 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—

2 On and after the effective date of the extension under sub3 section (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the prod4 ucts of Georgia, title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall

5 cease to apply to that country.

Æ
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM COON, DOC #H04539, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2568 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed April 5, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge. David Maldonado, J.D., of The Maldonado Law Firm, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and C. Suzanne Bechard, Chief-Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2195

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to the

provisions of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Truckee watershed reclamation project for the reclamation and reuse

of water.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2195 ES

1 SECTION 1. TRUCKEE WATERSHED RECLAMATION

2 PROJECT.

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior,

4 in cooperation with Washoe County, Nevada, may partici5 pate in the design, planning, and construction of, the

6 Truckee watershed reclamation project, consisting of the

7 North Valley Reuse Project and the Spanish Springs Val8 ley Septic Conversion Project (‘‘Project’’), to reclaim and

9 reuse wastewater (including degraded ground water) with10 in and without the service area of Washoe County, Ne11 vada.

12 (b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost of

13 the Project shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost.

14 (c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary

15 shall not be used for the operation or maintenance of the

16 Project.

17 (d) FUNDING.—Funds appropriated pursuant to sec18 tion 1615 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Ground19 water Study and Facilities Act may be used for the Project

20 (106 Stat. 4663–4669, 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.), as amend21 ed.

22 SEC. 2. RECLAMATION WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER

23 STUDY AND FACILITIES ACT

24 Design, planning, and construction of the Project

25 shall be in accordance with, and subject to the limitations

26 contained in, the Reclamation Wastewater and Ground-
3

S 2195 ES

1 water Study and Facilities Act (106 Stat. 4663–4669, 43

2 U.S.C. 390h et seq.), as amended.

Passed the Senate October 13 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2195

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to the provisions of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act

to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Truckee watershed reclamationproject for the reclamation and reuse of water.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Indian Gaming Commission


The National Environmental Policy Act Procedures Manual

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.

ACTION: Notice of reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice reopens the period for comments on the Draft NEPA 
Procedures Manual published in the Federal Register on December 4, 2009 
(74 FR 63765, 74 FR 63787).

DATES: The comment period for the Draft NEPA Procedures Manual is being 
reopened from January 19, 2010, to March 4, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Please submit your comments by only one of the following 
means: (1) By mail to: Brad Mehaffy, National Indian Gaming Commission, 
1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; (2) by hand 
delivery to: National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., 
Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; (3) by facsimile to: (202) 632-7066; 
(4) by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85ebe0f5e4daf5f7eae6e0e1f0f7e0f6c5ebece2e6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c72796c7d436c6e737f7978696e796f5c72757b7f327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>; or (5) online at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bradley Mehaffy, NEPA Compliance 
Officer at the National Indian Gaming Commission: 202-632-7003 or by 
facsimile at 303-632-7066 (not toll-free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: In response to several requests, the Acting 
Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission has decided to reopen 
the comment period on the Draft NEPA Procedures Manual for an 
additional 45 days.

    Dated: January 15, 2010.
George T. Skibine,
Acting Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-1148 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0012]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Long Term Loan or Guarantee (EIB 95-
10).

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    We have made the following changes to this application:
    a. Added fields for application, exporter, and supplier to indicate 
if they are Minority Owned or Woman Owned businesses;
    b. Added fields for the application to indicate if the export items 
are considered to be environmentally beneficial and/or if the project 
will be used to provide renewable energy;
    c. Added fields for the exporter and supplier to indicate how many 
FTEs were supported or created for this deal; and
    d. Changed the amount of financeable local costs from 15% to 30%.
    Our customers will be able to submit this form on paper or 
electronically. The information collected will provide information 
needed to determine compliance and creditworthiness for transaction 
requests submitted to the Export Import Bank under its long term 
guarantee and direct loan programs.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before (30 days after 
publication) to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Management and Budget, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB-3048-0013.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 95-10 Application for Long Term Loan or 
Guarantee.
    OMB Number: 3048-0013.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The information collected will provide information 
needed to determine compliance and creditworthiness for transaction 
requests submitted to the Export Import Bank under its long term 
guarantee and direct loan programs.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 84.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1.5 hours.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 2,016.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: On Occasion.
    Total Cost to the Government: $145,152.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-11669 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
### IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

20 24 WY 21

October Term, A.D. 2023

February 21, 2024

DANIEL E. BORJA, SR.,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff). S

- 23

- 0242



### O RDER 

### A FFIRMING THE 

### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### ’ S



### O RDER 

### R EVOKING 

### P ROBATION

[¶ 1 ] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that

Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Appellant took this appeal to

challenge the district court’s August 2, 20 23

, Order Following Disposition of Revocation

of Probation Hearing. The Court notes that order was later corrected nunc pro tunc

. Appellant admitted he violated h is probation . The district court revoked probation and

imposed a split sentence on Appellant’s conviction for taking a controlled substance into a

jail. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6

- 5

- 208; Borja v. State , 2023 WY 12, 523 P.3d 1212 (Wyo. 2023)

.

[¶2] On December 18 , 20 23 , Appellant’s court

- appoint ed appellate counsel filed a

Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87

S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order

Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that, on

or before February 1, 2024, Appellant may file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the

issues for the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, after

the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s

motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. This Court

notes that Appe llant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted.[¶3] Now, f ollowing a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by

appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be

granted and the district court’s o rder r evo king p robation should be affirmed. I t is,

therefore,

[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court

- appointed counsel

for A ppellant Daniel E. Borja, Sr. , is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record

for A ppellant; and it is further

[¶5 ] ORDERED that the Niobrara County D istrict C ourt’s August 2, 20 23 , “ Order

Following Disposition of Revocation of Probation Hearing

, ” be, and the same hereby is

, affirmed

.

[¶6] DATED this 2 1 st d ay of February , 20 24

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

KATE M. FOX

Chief Justice
Relocation Payback Agreement between William Yeates and Sensus Metering Systems



 Exhibit 10.34

  

  

Attachment B 
 

 
 RELOCATION PAYBACK AGREEMENT 
 Effective Date of Transfer     7-1-08                 
 I,     William T. Yeates     agree to pay back relocation expenses in accordance with the following
guidelines: 
    (Print Employee Name) 
 Terminations within 12 months of accepting new assignment 
 Voluntary Termination Within 12 months of accepting new
assignment 
 If I voluntarily terminate within 12 months of accepting the new assignment I agree to pay 100% of all expenses
reimbursed directly to me or on my behalf. Full payment will be made within 90 days from my departure date. 
 Involuntary Termination Within 12 months of
accepting new assignment 
 If my employment is terminated involuntarily and at the discretion of Sensus Metering Systems I
understand that I may have an obligation to pay back relocation expenses reimbursed to me or payments made on my behalf. 
 Terminations
with 24 months of accepting new assignment 
 Voluntary Termination Within 24 months of accepting new assignment 
 If I voluntarily terminate within 24 months of accepting the new assignment I agree to pay all relocation expenses reimbursed directly to me or on my behalf in according
to the payback schedule below. 
 Involuntary Termination Within 24 months of accepting new assignment 
 If my employment is terminated involuntarily and at the discretion of Sensus Metering Systems, I understand that I may have an obligation to pay back relocation expenses
reimbursed to me, or payments made on my behalf according to the payback schedule below: 
  

											
	13th Month	 	95%	 	17th Month	 	75%	 	21st Month	 	35%
	14th
Month	 	90%	 	18th Month	 	65%	 	22nd Month	 	25%
	15th
Month	 	85%	 	19th Month	 	55%	 	23rd Month	 	15%
	16th
Month	 	80%	 	20th Month	 	45%	 	24th Month	 	  5%

  

					
	 /s/ William T. Yeates
	  	Date	  	    6-5-08                    
	Employee Signature	  		  	
			
	 /s/ Michael DeCocco
	  	Date	  	    6-5-08                    
	Sensus Metering Systems HR Signature	  		  	

 The top portion of this form is to be completed at the time of authorization to move. A copy of the signed form
should be attached to the employee’s benefit package. The original should be retained by Sensus Metering Systems’ Human Resource Department. 
 To be filled out at the time of termination: 
 Date terminated
                     Sensus Metering Systems to be paid back in full by
                     
 Reason(s)
                                         
                                         
                       
 Sensus Metering
Systems Relocation Payback Agreement Rev. 5.05.06
Motion Denied; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion

filed October 26 , 2012.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00948

- CV

IN RE CHERYL LYNN HOERMANN , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Appeal from the County Court at Law Washington County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CCL

- 4371

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 15, 2012, relator Cheryl Lynn Hoermann
, filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this C ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator ask s this Court to compel the Honorable Judge Matthew Reue, presiding judge of the County Court at Law of Washington C ounty , to
vacate his order signed September 4, 2012, denying her motion to dismiss the third

- party intervention filed by Boyd Howsley

. Relator also filed a motion to stay proceedings in
the trial court during pendency of this proceeding

.2

Relator has not established that s he is entitled to relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, Jamison.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2149

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain other single

yarn of viscose rayon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. HOLLINGS (for himself and Mr. THURMOND) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain

other single yarn of viscose rayon.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.xx.xx Other yarn, single: Of viscose rayon, untwisted or

with a twist not exceeding

120 turns/m-Multifilament,

with twist of less than 5

turns or more per meter

(provided for in subheading

5403.31.00.40) .................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.
2

•S 2149 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to

3 goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consump4 tion, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ