alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27537-27538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Iowa Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the Iowa 
Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene on Thursday, June 17, 
2010 at 2 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 4 p.m. (CST) at Iowa 
Agriculture Development Authority, 505 5th Avenue, Suite 327, Des 
Moines, IA 50319. The purpose of the meeting is to conduct a briefing 
and planning a future civil rights project.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by July 16, 2010. The 
address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who 
desire additional

[[Page 27538]]

information should contact Farella E. Robinson, Regional Director, 
Central Regional Office, at (913) 551-1400 (or for hearing impaired TDD 
913-551-1414), or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d4b5f424f44435e42436d585e4e4e5f034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="47213528252e2934282907323424243569202831">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Central Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, 12 May, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-11700 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Ronald Reagan Cabinet Nominations

**

----

Article II, section 2 of the *Constitution* gives the Senate responsibility for considering and confirming the president's executive and judicial nominations.

**Key:**

* Returned to president under Senate Rule XXXI, paragraph 6 of the Standing Rules of the Senate.

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure
##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Carbo
Ceramics Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
    
    March 2, 2005/s/ C. Mark PearsonName:
    
    C. Mark PearsonTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDated:
    
    March 2, 2005/s/ Paul G. VitekName:
    
    Paul G. VitekTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2391 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2391

     To suspend temporarily the duty on (S)-6-chloro-3,4-dihydro-4-
       cyclopropylethynyl-4-trifluoromethyl-2(1H)-quinazolinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2000

   Mr. Roth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on (S)-6-chloro-3,4-dihydro-4-
       cyclopropylethynyl-4-trifluoromethyl-2(1H)-quinazolinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. (S)-6-CHLORO-3,4-DIHYDRO-4-CYCLOPROPYLETHYNYL-4-
              TRIFLUOROMETHYL-2(1H)-QUINAZOLINONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking heading 
9902.29.33 and inserting in numerical sequence the following new 
heading:

      

``    9902.29.34     (S)-6-chloro-    Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     3,4-dihydro-4-                                                          31/2003          ''
                     cyclopropylethy                                                                           .
                     nyl-4-
                     trifluoromethyl-
                     2(1H)-
                     quinazolinone
                     (CAS No. 214287-
                     88-4) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     2933.90.46)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                                HEARTPORT, INC.
                  STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Years Ended December 31,
                                       --------------------------------------
                                           1996        1995          1994
                                       -----------  -----------  ------------
                                        (in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                     <C>          <C>           <C>
PRO FORMA
Net loss                                $(34,054)    $(9,353)      
                                        --------     -------
                                        --------     -------
Weighted average common
  shares outstanding                      22,771       5,982

Convertible preferred
  shares outstanding                           -       9,238

Shares related to SAB No.
  55, 64 and 83                                -       4,562
                                        --------     -------

Total weighted average common
  shares outstanding                      22,771      19,782
                                        --------     -------
                                        --------     -------

Net loss per share                        $(1.50)     $(0.47)
                                        --------     -------
                                        --------     -------

HISTORICAL
Net loss                                $(34,054)    $(9,353)      $(4,821)
                                        --------     -------       -------
                                        --------     -------       -------

Weighted average common
  shares outstanding                      18,712       5,982         6,053

Shares related to SAB No.
  55, 64 and 83                            1,782       7,128         7,128
                                        --------     -------       -------

Total weighted average common
  shares outstanding                      20,494      13,110        13,181
                                        --------     -------       -------
                                        --------     -------       -------

Net loss per share                      $  (1.66)    $ (0.71)      $ (0.37)
                                        --------     -------       -------
                                        --------     -------       -------
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              22
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      399
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   630
<PP&E>                                           4,773
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              828
<BONDS>                                          1,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,991
<SALES>                                          1,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,715
<CGS>                                            1,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  99
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    169
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.90


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2275

RUTH HUBBARD MERIDETH, a/k/a Ruth Hubbard

Lovinsohn,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-97-190-1-C)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 16, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ruth Hubbard Meredith, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph L. Brinkley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1994).

2 Although the magistrate judge’s order is marked as “filed”

on July 2, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on July 6, 1998. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet

that we take as the effective date of the magistrate judge’s

decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Ruth Merideth appeals from the magistrate judge’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment on her claim for

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.1

Our review of the record discloses that the Commissioner’s decision

was based on substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.

See Merideth v. Apfel, No. CA-97-190-1-C (W.D.N.C. July 6, 1998).2

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES CONTAINED IN THE 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
TO SHAREHOLDERS OF COLUMBIA BANCORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                      23,807,918
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,167,580
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,141,133
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 41,025,734
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      19,518,428
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    299,140,805
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,577,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             416,859,015
<DEPOSITS>                                 346,427,421
<SHORT-TERM>                                25,149,520
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,736,206
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,219,703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       14,461,771
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,864,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             416,859,015
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             29,472,770
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,419,489
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               474,869
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            33,367,128
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          10,782,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,356,347
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       21,110,781
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,697,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (6,929)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             10,477,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,929,032
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,624,035
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,624,035
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.48
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,163,008
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,675
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               116,435
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,298,460
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  459,824
<RECOVERIES>                                    42,305
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,577,941
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,577,941
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 24, 2010 

d0317 

Order 

 

March 24, 2010 

139910 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139910 

 COA: 289151 

Wayne CC: 08-002525-FC 

HARVEY MALONE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7377

CORNELIOUS ROBINSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

LATEEF AZEEM LUTALO; DONNIE R. MORGAN; JOHN F.

WEIKEL,

Plaintiffs,

versus

JAMES B. FRENCH; SHERWOOD B. MCCABE; DAUNA

BERTRUM; GEORGE L. JONES; JAMES E. STRICKLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-401-5)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cornelious Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Cornelious Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 1915A (West Supp. 1998). Robinson alleges deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and denial of First Amendment

rights to a religious diet. After reviewing the record and the

district court’s opinion, we conclude that Robinson fails to state

a claim upon which relief may be granted and dismiss the appeal for

that reason. Robinson fails to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate a constitutional violation. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
II

Calendar No. 710

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2425

[Report No. 106–359]

To authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to participate in the planning,

design, and construction of the Bend Feed Canal Pipeline Project, Oregon, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 13, 2000

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

JULY 24, 2000

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, with an amendment

[Omit the part struck through]

A BILL

To authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to participate in

the planning, design, and construction of the Bend Feed

Canal Pipeline Project, Oregon, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2425 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bend Feed Canal Pipe3 line Project Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. FEDERAL PARTICIPATION.

5 (a) The Secretary of the Interior, in cooperation with

6 the Tumalo Irrigation District (referred to in this section

7 as the ‘‘District’’), is authorized to participate in the plan8 ning, design, and construction of the Bend Feed Canal

9 Pipeline Project, Oregon.

10 (b) The Federal share of the costs of the project shall

11 not exceed 50 per centum of the total, and shall be non12 reimbursable. The District shall receive credit from the

13 Secretary toward the District’s share of the project for

14 any funds the District has provided toward the design,

15 planning or construction prior to the enactment of this

16 Act.

17 (c) Funds received under this Act shall not be consid18 ered a supplemental or additional benefit under the Act

19 of June 17, 1902 (82 Stat. 388) and all Acts amendatory

20 thereof or supplementary thereto.

21 (d) Title to facilities constructed under this Act will

22 be held by the District.

23 (e) Operations and maintenance of the facilities will

24 be the responsibility of the District.
3

S 2425 RS

1 (f) There are authorized to be appropriated $2.5 mil2 lion for the Federal share of the activities authorized

3 under this Act.

4 (g) The Bureau of Reclamation shall not charge the

5 District more than one percent of the project cost for car6 rying out administrative or oversight activities under this

7 Act.
Calendar No. 710

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2425

[Report No. 106–359]

A BILL

To authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to participate in the planning, design, and construction of

the Bend Feed Canal Pipeline Project, Oregon,and for other purposes.

JULY 24, 2000

Reported with an amendment
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2141 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2141

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to the products of Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to the products of Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Georgia has been found to be in full compliance with 
        the freedom of emigration requirements under title IV of the 
        Trade Act of 1974.
            (2) Since its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, 
        Georgia has made great progress toward democratic rule and 
        toward creating a free-market economy system.
            (3) Georgia concluded a bilateral investment treaty with 
        the United States in 1994.
            (4) Georgia has demonstrated a strong desire to build a 
        friendly and cooperative relationship with the United States.
            (5) The extension of unconditional normal trade relations 
        treatment to the products of Georgia will enable the United 
        States to avail itself of all rights under the World Trade 
        Organization with respect to Georgia.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 
              TO GEORGIA.

    (a) Presidential Determinations and Extensions of Nondiscriminatory 
Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Trade Act 
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may--
            (1) determine that such title should no longer apply to 
        Georgia; and
            (2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to Georgia, proclaim the extension of nondiscriminatory 
        treatment (normal trade relations treatment) to the products of 
        that country.
    (b) Termination of Application of Title IV.--On and after the 
effective date of the extension under subsection (a)(2) of 
nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Georgia, title IV of the 
Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to that country.
                                 <all>
```