alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NO. 12-09-00023-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S

JEFF ERY L. CONWAY, § APPEAL F ROM THE 217TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF TH E ST ATE OF TEX

AS, APP ELL EE § AN GE LI NA CO UN TY

, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM This appeal i s b ei n g dismiss ed for want of jurisdiction. Appe llant was convic ted of aggra vated a ssault, and sentenc e wa s imposed on October 10, 2008. Texa s Rule of Appellate Procedur e 26.2 provide s that an appe al is perf ecte d when notice of
a pp e a l is fi le d w ith in thirty da ys a ft e r the da y se nte nc e is imp os e d or su sp e nd e d in op e n c ou rt un le ss a motion for new trial is timely filed. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a) (1). Wher e a timely moti on for ne w trial has bee n filed, not ice of appea l shall be filed within ni nety days a fter the sentenc e is imposed or suspende d in open court. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26 .2 (a )( 2)

. Ap pe lla nt d id n ot f ile a mot ion fo r n e w t

ri a l. There fore , his notice of appe al was d u e t o h av e bee n filed on or be fore November 10, 2008. Howeve r, Appe llant did not file his noti ce of appea l until December

3, 2008 and did not file a mot ion fo r e xte ns ion of

tim e to f ile his no tic e of

a pp e a l a s p e rm itt e d b y T e xa s Rule of Ap pe lla te Procedur e 26.3. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3 (appe llate court may extend time for filing notice of a ppeal if, within fifteen da ys after deadline f

or filing notice of appea l, appellant files notice of appe al in trial court a nd motion complying wit h Texa s Rule of Appellate Procedur e 10.5(b) in appellate c ourt). On Janua ry 20, 2009, this c ourt notified Appellant that the information filed in this appeal does not include a

notice of a

ppeal f iled within the time allowed by rule 26.2 or a timely motion for
a n e xte ns ion of tim e a s pe rm itt e d by ru le 26 .3

. Ap pe lla nt wa s f ur the r i nf or me d th a t hi s a

pp e a l w ou ld2

be dis mis se d u nle ss the inf or ma tio n in thi s a

pp e a l w a s a me nd e d, on or be fo re Ja nu a ry 30 , 2 00 9, to show the jurisdiction of this court. On Februa ry 9, 2009, in response to this court’s January 20, 2009 no tic e , A pp e lla nt f

ile d a mot ion fo r e xte ns ion of

tim e to fi le his app e a l. T his mot ion is u nti me ly beca use it was not filed withi n fi ft ee n d ays after the notice of appe al was due , i.e., Novembe r 25, 2008, as re quired by rule 26.3. Because this court has no authority to a l l o w t h e late f iling of a notice of a

ppeal e xcept a s provided by Rule 26.3, the a ppeal must be dismissed. See Sla ton v . St ate , 9 8 1 S .W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) . Acc ordingly, Appellant’s motion for extension of time is overr uled, and the a pp e a l is dismiss ed for want of juri sdiction

. Opinion delivere d February 25, 2009. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBLISH)
Exhibit 32.1

                         ASHLIN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Ashlin
Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Brown, Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ James A. Brown
---------------------------
James A. Brown
Chief Executive Officer
April 29, 2005
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50639 Conference Calendar

DALJIT S. JANDU, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION; IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A:97-CV-911

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Daljit Jandu appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil lawsuit premised on federal-question jurisdiction and imposing $1,000 in sanctions. Jandu, however, has not identified any error on the part of the district court in his initial brief on appeal. He has failed to brief the only two issues arguably on appeal, that is, whether the district court erred either inNo. 98-50639 -2- dismissing his suit or in imposing sanctions. Jandu has presented nothing for this court to review. His appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. We warn Jandu that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Jandu is cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. Finally, Jandu’s motion to expedite his appeal and his motion for decision support are DENIED.
MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
20-F











Exhibit 10.1  



Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm 



The Board of Directors 

B.V.R Systems (1998) Ltd.: 



We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-125879 and 333-140937) of
B.V.R Systems (1998) Ltd. of our report dated June 4, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of B.V.R Systems (1998) Ltd. and subsidiaries (“the
Company”), as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements,
of operations, recognized income and expenses and cash flows for the years then ended,
which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 20-F of B.V.R Systems
(1998) Ltd. 



Our audit report refers to the
Company’s election in 2008 to change its basis of accounting used in preparing its
financial statements to be in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards
as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”).
Consequently, the Company’s annual prior year financial statements for 2007, referred
to above, are being now presented in accordance with IFRS. 



/s/ Somekh Chaikin
Somekh Chaikin

Certified Public Accountants (lsr.)

Member Firm of KPMG International


Tel Aviv, Israel




June 4, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Cancelation of Notice of Intent.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Seattle District will issue a revised Notice of Intent at a later date. The notice that was previously published in the                         **Federal Register**                         (75 FR 25217) on May 7, 2010 is cancelled.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-11816 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
|MOEN AND COMPANY LLP
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Member:
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
Institute of Chartered Accountants of British Columbia
Institute of Management Accountants (USA) (From 1965)

Registered with:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (USA) (PCAOB)
Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB)
Canada  - British Columbia Public Practice Licence







June 13, 2006

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption Experts and to the use of our report dated May 31, 2006 on the audited financial statements as at January 31, 2006, which appear in the Form 10-KSB of Amersin Life Sciences Corporation.







Yours very truly,

MOEN AND COMPANY LLP

Chartered Accountants



Moen and Company LLP

(Signed)



Moen and Company LLP







Exhibit 23.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Solely  for the  purposes  of  complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  I, the
undersigned  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of The Chalone Wine Group,
Ltd. (the "Company"),  hereby certify that to his knowledge the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2003 (the
"Report")  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.  This written  statement is being furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed
original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.


By:            /s/ THOMAS B. SELFRIDGE
          -----------------------------------
                 Thomas B. Selfridge

May 14, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 5, 2012 

d0227 

Order 

 

March 5, 2012 

144025 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144025 

 COA: 298417 

Oakland CC: 2009-229331-FC 

MICHAEL RAY RICHARD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
October 29, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GEORGE NEAL WILLIAMS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00700

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record reveals error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment REVERSED and RENDERS judgment of acquittal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance

.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2005 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2005

         To repeal the modification of the installment method.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2000

 Mr. Burns (for himself, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Grams, and Mr. 
    Allard) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To repeal the modification of the installment method.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MODIFICATION OF INSTALLMENT METHOD.

    (a) In General.--Section 536 of the Ticket to Work and Work 
Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 (relating to modification of 
installment method and repeal of installment method for accrual method 
taxpayers) is repealed effective with respect to sales and other 
dispositions occurring on or after the date of the enactment of such 
Act.
    (b) Applicability.--The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 
applied and administered as if that section (and the amendments made by 
that section) had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                               CERTIFICATIONS


      I, Kenny D. Neal, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of First McMinnville Corporation;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.


November 12, 2003




/s/ Kenny D. Neal
------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.28 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 
 This FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the
“AMENDMENT”) is dated as of May 14, 2009, and amends that certain Employment Agreement (the “AGREEMENT”), effective as of April 1, 2006, by and between ENHERENT CORP., a Delaware corporation (the “COMPANY”)
and LORI STANLEY (the “EXECUTIVE”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H:

 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 16 thereof as of the date hereof. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Amendment. Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 (a) Effective May 16, 2009, the Executive shall receive an annualized base salary (“Annual Base Salary”) of $160,000 payable
in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices for its senior executives, as in effect from time to time. 
 2. Affirmation of
Agreement. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. From and after the date hereof, each reference to the Agreement and the documents or instruments referred to or provided for in or delivered under the
Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Agreement as modified hereby. 
 3. Conflict. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of
this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control. 
 4. Definitions. All
capitalized terms used herein, except as specifically provided herein, have the same meanings as those in the Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and, pursuant to the authorization of its Board, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name on its behalf. 
  

			
	ENHERENT CORP.
		
	By:	 	 Pamela Fredette




			
	Name:	 	 /s/ Pamela Fredette




			
	Title:	 	 /s/ President & CEO

	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Lori Stanley

	Lori Stanley
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     4,390,823
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,390,823)        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          0
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
                                              

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                               132,807
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                        424,331
<ALLOWANCES>                         (5,000)
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     562,939
<PP&E>                               500,086
<DEPRECIATION>                       (309,937)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       753,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                400,967
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                5,538
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                           346,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         753,088
<SALES>                              2,205,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     2,205,679
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      302,870
<INCOME-TAX>                         (103,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  199,470
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         199,470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0
        


</TABLE>