3756 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

and Record of Decision. Because of the 

significance of paleontological, 

botanical, hydrological, and cultural 

resources present within the CTA study 

area and the need for additional public 

input, the BLM is preparing a 

Supplemental EIS. The BLM proposes to 

establish a final boundary for the CTA. 

This decision was not made in the 2004 

Record of Decision. The CTA study area 

is located in the northern portion of the 

Las Vegas Valley. A defined final 

boundary is needed to ensure protection 

of sensitive resources, including fossils, 

cultural resources, the natural 

functioning of the wash, and endemic 

plants on public lands available for 

disposal within the CTA study area, in 

accordance with applicable laws. 

Six alternatives for boundaries are 

analyzed, ranging from approximately 

13,000 acres to less than 1,500 acres. 

Alternative A, at 12,953 acres, includes 

the fossil formation, sensitive cultural 

and plant resources, active wash, the 

adjacent alluvial fan, and a one mile 

resource protection zone around 

northern and eastern boundaries of the 

Las Vegas Paiute reservation. 

Alternative B, at 11,008 acres, includes 

the fossil formation, sensitive cultural 

and plant resources, active wash, and 

the adjacent alluvial fan. Alternative B 

is the BLM’s Preferred Alternative. 

Alternative C, at 6,362 acres, includes 

the fossil formation, sensitive cultural 

and plant resources, active wash, and a 

portion of the adjacent alluvial fan. 

Alternative D, at 5,301 acres, includes 

most of the fossil formation, the 

sensitive cultural and rare plant 

resources, and the active wash. 

Alternative E, at 3,314 acres, includes 

some of the fossil formation, the 

sensitive cultural and rare plant 

resources, and part of the active wash. 

The No Action alternative, at 1,448 

acres, includes the Tule Spring cultural 

site and the 300-acre Eglington Preserve. 

Scoping of the project occurred from 

June 6 to August 20, 2007, and was 

extended to September 4, 2007. A total 

of 1,183 individuals submitted 

comments. Comments received 

pertained to a variety of broad 

categories, including alternatives, 

boundaries, management, and physical/ 

natural resources. Additional 

stakeholder involvement has been 

achieved through the BLM’s newsletters 

that provided updates on the 

Supplemental EIS process. 

The Draft Supplemental EIS addresses 

the following issues identified during 

scoping: NEPA process (consultation/ 

coordination, proposal description, 

alternatives, and connected actions/ 

cumulative impacts); social resources 

(cultural resources, visual resources, 

noise, land use, recreation, 

transportation, and socioeconomic 

resources); and physical/natural 

resources (botanical resources, water 

resources, paleontological resources, 

and geologic/soil resources). 

Maps of the CTA study area and the 

alternatives being analyzed in the 

Supplemental EIS are available at the 

BLM Las Vegas Field Office. Please note 

that public comments and information 

submitted including names, street 

addresses, and e-mail addresses of 

persons who submit comments will be 

available for public review and 

disclosure at the above address during 

regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.), 

Monday through Friday, except 

holidays. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6 and 1506.10. 

Angie Lara, 

Associate District Manager. 

[FR Doc. 2010–976 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Indian Gaming Commission 

The National Environmental Policy Act 

Procedures Manual 

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of reopening of comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: This notice reopens the 

period for comments on the Draft NEPA 

Procedures Manual published in the 

Federal Register on December 4, 2009 

(74 FR 63765, 74 FR 63787). 

DATES: The comment period for the 

Draft NEPA Procedures Manual is being 

reopened from January 19, 2010, to 

March 4, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Please submit your 

comments by only one of the following 

means: (1) By mail to: Brad Mehaffy, 

National Indian Gaming Commission, 

1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, 

Washington, DC 20005; (2) by hand 

delivery to: National Indian Gaming 

Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 

9100, Washington, DC 20005; (3) by 

facsimile to: (202) 632–7066; (4) by email to: nepa_procedures@nigc.gov; or 

(5) online at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bradley Mehaffy, NEPA Compliance 

Officer at the National Indian Gaming 

Commission: 202–632–7003 or by 

facsimile at 303–632–7066 (not toll-free 

numbers). 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: In response 

to several requests, the Acting Chairman 

of the National Indian Gaming 

Commission has decided to reopen the 

comment period on the Draft NEPA 

Procedures Manual for an additional 45 

days. 

Dated: January 15, 2010. 

George T. Skibine, 

Acting Chairman, National Indian Gaming 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–1148 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7565–01–P 

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL 

TRADE COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–776–779 

(Second Review)] 

Preserved Mushrooms from Chile, 

China, India, and Indonesia 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of expedited fiveyear reviews concerning the 

antidumping duty orders on preserved 

mushrooms from Chile, China, India, 

and Indonesia. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of expedited 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on preserved mushrooms 

from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury within 

a reasonably foreseeable time. For 

further information concerning the 

conduct of these reviews and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Haines (202–205–3200), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 14 / Friday, January 22, 2010 / Notices 3757 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On January 4, 2010, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (74 

FR 50818, October 1, 2009) for each 

review was adequate and that the 

respondent interested party group 

response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct expedited reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the reviews will be 

placed in the nonpublic record on 

February 17, 2010, and made available 

to persons on the Administrative 

Protective Order service list for these 

reviews. A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution, and any party other 

than an interested party to the reviews, 

may file written comments with the 

Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

February 23, 2010 and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

reviews nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the review by 

February 23, 2010. If comments contain 

business proprietary information (BPI), 

they must conform with the 

requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, 

and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. 

The Commission’s rules do not 

authorize filing of submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means, except to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, 

as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 

2002). Even where electronic filing of a 

document is permitted, certain 

documents must also be filed in paper 

form, as specified in II (C) of the 

Commission’s Handbook on Electronic 

Filing Procedures, 67 Fed. Reg. 68168, 

68173 (November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the reviews must be 

served on all other parties to the reviews 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined to exercise its authority to 

extend the review period by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 15, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–1136 Filed 1–21–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1121–0311] 

Bureau of Justice Statistics; Agency 

Information Collection Activities: 

Proposed Collection; Comments 

Requested 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Extension of 

Existing Collection With Change; 

National Inmate Survey. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted for 

‘‘sixty days’’ until March 23, 2010. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Paige M. Harrison, 

Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh 

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531 

(phone: 202–514–0809). 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the 

proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

collection of information, including 

the validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of this information 

collection: 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of existing collection with 

change. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

National Inmate Survey. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Paper and Pencil 

questionnaires—PAPI M12, PAPI M<12, 

PAPI F12, PAPI F<12, SP PAPI M12, SP 

PAPI M<12, SP PAPI F12, SP PAPI 

F<12; Facility Characteristics survey— 

NIS FS. The Bureau of Justice Statistics, 

Office of Justice Programs, Department 

of Justice is the sponsor for the 

collection. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: State, Local, or Tribal 

Government. Other: Federal 

Government, Business or other forprofit, Not-for-profit institutions. The 

work under this clearance will be used 

to produce estimates for the incidence 

and prevalence of sexual assault within 

correctional facilities as required under 

the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 

(Pub. L. 108–79). 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES