alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
[ARTICLE] 5

[CIK] 0000743241
[NAME] REII INCORPORATED
<S>                          <C>                    <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]               9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                                DEC-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                                     SEP-30-2000
[CASH]                                                13,508
[SECURITIES]                                               0
[RECEIVABLES]                                              0
[ALLOWANCES]                                               0
[INVENTORY]                                                0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                   1,795,721
[PP&E]                                             1,705,231
[DEPRECIATION]                                             0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                     1,795,721
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                              1,712,737
[BONDS]                                                    0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                      0
[PREFERRED]                                                0
[COMMON]                                               4,655
[OTHER-SE]                                           405,426
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                       1,795,721
[SALES]                                                    0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     163,352
[CGS]                                                      0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        218,535
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                           0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                           0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                         0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      (55,183)
[INCOME-TAX]                                               0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                        0
[DISCONTINUED]                                             0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                            0
[CHANGES]                                                  0
[NET-INCOME]                                         (55,183)
[EPS-BASIC]                                          (.012)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                          (.012)








</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40680 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
SOBEC LOPEZ

- URGELL , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19

- CR

- 163

- 1

Before GRAVES , DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sobec Lopez

- Urgell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez

- Urgell h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and t he relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 25, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40680 Document: 00515358804 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2020No. 19

- 40680

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40680 Document: 00515358804 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/25/2020
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frontier Electric Railway Company, Appellant, v. City of North Tonawanda, Respondent.

Motion to amend decision denied, with ten dollars costs.

All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ , who dissented.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43217

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JORDAN GARTH BRANDON ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 507

Filed: April 28, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Cassia County. Hon. Michael R. Crabtree , District Judge.

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

__________ ______________________________________ Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Jordan Garth Brandon pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance . I.C. § 37

- 2732(c)(1)

. I n exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge was dismissed. The district

court sentenced Brandon to a unified term of four years, with a minimum period of confinement

of one year . The district court retained jurisdiction, and Brandon was sent to participate in the
rider program.

After Brandon completed his rider, the district court relinquished jurisdiction. However,
the district court sua sponte reduced Brandon’s sent ence to a unified term of one and one

- half2

years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year. Brandon appeals, claiming that the
district court should have further sua sponte reduced his sentence.

Our decision in State v. Clontz , 156 Idaho 787, 792, 331 P.3d 529, 534 (Ct. App. 2014)
forecloses a claim that a district court erred by failing to sua sponte reduce an underlying
sentence upon relinquishment of jurisdiction. Brandon asserts that Clontz is distinguishable from

his case because the dist rict court did sua sponte reduce his sentence. However, the district court
did not err because it did not deny any relief requested by Brandon. Accordingly, Brandon’s
argument that the court should have further sua sponte reduced his sentence fails.

We n ote that pursuant to I.A.R. 14, Brandon could have directly appealed his sentence
after jurisdiction was relinquished. However, even if we treat Brandon’s appeal as an appeal of
his sentence, there is no error. Our appellate standard of review and the fa ctors to be considered
when evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established. State v. Burdett , 134
Idaho 271, 1 P.3d 299 (Ct. App. 2000); State v. Sanchez , 115 Idaho 776, 769 P.2d 1148 (Ct. App.
1989); State v. Reinke , 103 Idaho 771, 653 P.2d 1183 (Ct. App. 1982); State v. Toohill , 103
Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct. App. 1982).
Brandon’s argument that the district court should have further sua sponte reduced his
sentence is foreclosed by Clontz. Even if we treat Brandon’s appeal as a dire ct appeal of his
sentence, he has shown no error. The district court’s order relinquishing jurisdiction and the
sentence imposed are affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1

May 15, 2009

Verified Transactions Corp
150-4170 Still Creek;
Burnaby, BC
V5C 6C6

Att: Danny Scammell

Verifysmart Corp (formerly Verified Capital Corp)
150-4170 Still Creek;
Burnaby, BC
V5C 6C6

Att: Casper de Beer

Dear Sirs:

Re: Joint Venture Agreement ("JV") made March 25, 2009

We are writing further to our discussions. We confirm that it is our mutual
understanding and agreement that the JV has been satisfactorily performed by us,
VerifySmart Corp. ("VSC") (Nevada), and that we have performed the required
financial obligations of section 5.01 through both fund raising and joint
venture cost sharing and accordingly VSC's obligations of section 5.01 are fully
satisfied, the JV agreement is in full force and effect in good standing and
VSC's revenue sharing right to 70% of the JV's revenue commences this date.

Please execute below to signify your consent and approval to the above.

Yours truly,

VerifySmart Corp


Per: /s/ Ralph Santos
   -------------------------------
   Ralph Santos
   President

The foregoing is hereby agreed effective the above date.

Verified Transactions Corp.             VerifySmart Corp (Verified Capital Corp)



Per: /s/                                Per: /s/
    Authorized Signatory                    Authorized Signatory
#  Delegation of Authority Relating To Certain Functions Under Section 201 (B) of the United States-india Nuclear Cooperation Approval And Nonproliferation Enhancement Act (Public Law 110-369) 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Energy 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the certification and reporting functions conferred upon the President by section 201 (b) of the United States-India Nuclear Cooperation Approval and Nonproliferation Enhancement Act (Public Law 110-369).

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2010-11725

Billing code 6450-01-P
CHIEF JUSTICE

 CAROLYN WRIGHT

JUSTICES

 DAVID L. BRIDGES

 MOLLY FRANCIS

 DOUGLAS S. LANG

 ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

 ROBERT M. FILLMORE

 LANA MYERS

 DAVID EVANS

 ADA BROWN

 CRAIG STODDART

 BILL WHITEHILL

 DAVID J. SCHENCK

 JASON BOATRIGHT

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 COMMERCE STREET, SUITE 200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75202

(214) 712-3400

LISA MATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712-3450

lisa.matz@5th.txcourts.gov

GAYLE HUMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR

(214) 712-3434

gayle.humpa@5th.txcourts.gov

FACSIMILE

(214) 745-1083

INTERNET

HTTP://5TH.TXCOURTS.GOV

January 30, 2018

W. Bradford Hill, Jr. Greg K. Winslett

Hill & Finkel, LLP Quilling Selander Lownds Winslett Moser, PC

602 Sawyer Street, Suite, 450 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800

Houston, TX 77007-7524 Dallas, TX 75201-3070

Kevin B. Finkel Audrey Mola Momanaee Chatrodi

Hill & Finkel, LLP Gardere Wynne Sewell, LLP

602 Sawyer Street, Suite 450 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 3400

Houston, TX 77007-7521 Houston, TX 77002-5011

Michael Feiler Gregory R. Ave

Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett Walters Balido & Crain, LLP

& Moser, PC Meadow Park Tower, Suite 1500

2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800 10440 North Central Expressway

Dallas, TX 75201 Dallas, TX 75231

Michael K. Hurst Marvin C. Moos

Lynn Pinker Cox & Hurst, LLP Horne Rota Moos, LLP

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2700 2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 1200

Dallas, TX 75201 Houston, TX 77019

Peter Scaff

Gardere Wynne Sewell, LLP

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 3400

Houston, TX 77002-2011

Re: Basic Energy Services, L.P. v. EXCO Resources, Inc. et al.; 05-15-00667-CV
2

Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed is a corrected page for the above-mentioned case. Please note the following typographical 

error, which has been corrected:

Page 12, paragraph 1, line 4, replace Anderson with Andersen

Please replace page twelve of your previous copy with the enclosed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Lisa Matz

Lisa Matz

Clerk of the Court

cc: Trial court judge

Trial court clerk

150667LF.P05
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2146

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide

for temporary duty-free treatment for certain semi-manufactured forms

of gold.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. CRAPO (for himself and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to provide for temporary duty-free treatment for

certain semi-manufactured forms of gold.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CER4 TAIN SEMI-MANUFACTURED FORMS OF GOLD.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subheading 9902.71.08 of the

6 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2000’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/

8 2005’’.
2

•S 2146 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 1,642.

#### BALLARD et al., Respondents, *v.*PATTEN et al.; Appellants.

*Appeal*from, *District Court, Granite County; Welling Nap-ton, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided July 14, 1903.

*Messrs. McConnell & McConnell,*and *Mr. W. JE. Moore,*for Appellants.

*Mr. D. M. Durfee,*for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

THe motion to dismiss tbe appeal herein is sustained and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Westbank Corporation (the "Corporation") does hereby
certify to such officer's knowledge that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of the
Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Corporation.

Date: May 6, 2005                          /s/     John M. Lilly
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John M. Lilly
                                           Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2365

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 15 percent

reduction in payment rates under the prospective payment system for

home health services.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 5, 2000

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. BOND, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr.

REED, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. COCHRAN,

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HOLLINGS, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr.

MURKOWSKI, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr.

EDWARDS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. ENZI, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. CLELAND, Mr.

HAGEL, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. GORTON, Mr. HUTCHINSON,

Mr. HELMS, Mr. ALLARD, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. L. CHAFEE, Mr. DEWINE,

Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BROWNBACK, and Mr.

VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate

the 15 percent reduction in payment rates under the

prospective payment system for home health services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Health Payment

5 Fairness Act of 2000’’.
2

•S 2365 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF 15 PERCENT REDUCTION IN PAY2 MENT RATES UNDER THE PROSPECTIVE PAY3 MENT SYSTEM FOR HOME HEALTH SERVICES.

4 Section 1895(b)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (42

5 U.S.C. 1395fff(b)(3)(A)) (as amended by sections 302(b)

6 and 303(b) of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Bal7 anced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–

8 113; 113 Stat. 1501A–359 and 1501A–361) is amended

9 to read as follows:

10 ‘‘(A) INITIAL BASIS.—Under such system

11 the Secretary shall provide for computation of

12 a standard prospective payment amount (or

13 amounts). Such amount (or amounts) shall ini14 tially be based on the most current audited cost

15 report data available to the Secretary and shall

16 be computed in a manner so that the total

17 amounts payable under the system for the 12-

18 month period beginning on the date the Sec19 retary implements the system shall be equal to

20 the total amount that would have been made if

21 the system had not been in effect and if section

22 1861(v)(1)(L)(ix) had not been enacted. Each

23 such amount shall be standardized in a manner

24 that eliminates the effect of variations in rel25 ative case mix and area wage adjustments

26 among different home health agencies in a
3

•S 2365 IS

1 budget neutral manner consistent with the case

2 mix and wage level adjustments provided under

3 paragraph (4)(A). Under the system, the Sec4 retary may recognize regional differences or dif5 ferences based upon whether or not the services

6 or agency are in an urbanized area.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         264,826
<SECURITIES>                                   219,880
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,664
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,965
<PP&E>                                       1,193,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                 209,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,748,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,666
<BONDS>                                        450,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          447,858
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                           364
<OTHER-SE>                                    (72,912)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,748,237
<SALES>                                        668,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               668,568
<CGS>                                          433,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  699,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                55,113
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (31,683)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (80,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (13,925)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (95,504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (66,952)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (162,456)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.15)
        

</TABLE>
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2289

AN ACT

For the relief of Jose Guadalupe Tellez Pinales.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Jose Guadalupe Tellez Pinales shall be held

7 and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the

8 United States for permanent residence as of the date of

9 the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required

10 visa fee.

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2289

AN ACT

For the relief of Jose Guadalupe Tellez Pinales.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2472

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to restore certain penalties under

that Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 26, 2000

Mr. SHELBY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to restore certain

penalties under that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Migratory Bird Pen5 alty Restoration Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF PENALTIES.

7 Section 6 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16

8 U.S.C. 707) is amended—

9 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘$15,000’’

10 and inserting ‘‘$5,000’’; and
2

•S 2472 IS

1 (2) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the

2 following:

3 ‘‘(c) PLACEMENT OF BAIT.—Notwithstanding section

4 3571 of title 18, United States Code—

5 ‘‘(1) an individual who violates section 3(b)(2)

6 shall be fined not more than $5000, imprisoned not

7 more than 1 year, or both; and

8 ‘‘(2) a person, other than an individual, that

9 violates section 3(b)(2) shall be fined not more than

10 $10,000, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or

11 both.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Apex Resources Group, Inc., on Form
        10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *"Report"* ),
        the
        undersigned, John Hickey, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
                  February 7, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                  John M. HickeyJohn
                  M. Hickey, Principal Financial
                  Officer