alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5

Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation

Directors Annual Compensation

As of December 31, 2010



|                                                        |  |        |                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------ | --------------- | 
|                                                        |  | Amount |                
|Annual Retainer                                         |  |        |                 | 
|                                                        | 
|Service as Director for the Company                     |  | $      | 2,000           | 
|                                                        | 
|Service as Director for the Bank                        |  | $      | 4,000           | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer                                     |  |        |                 | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer for Chairman of the Board           |  | $      | 1,500           | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer for Vice Chairman of the Board      |  | $      | 500             | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer for Chair of Audit Committee        |  | $      | 1,500           | 
|                                                        | 
|Additional Retainer for Chair of Compensation Committee |  | $      | 1,000           | 
|                                                        | 
|Meeting Fees (Non-Employee Directors)                   |  |        |                 | 
|                                                        | 
|Committee Meetings for the Company                      |  | $      | 250 per meeting | 
|                                                        | 
|Committee Meetings for the Bank                         |  | $      | 250 per meeting |
OFFICE OF THE **AmORNEY** GENERAL OF TAUSTIN

.’ .’ i

### 682

"A tax sh4ll ba paid **by** esoh produoer on the ammmt of gss producedand 

### savegwithin t&s Stnto equivalentto five and two-tenths (5.2)per cent of t&e mrket value thy-eof DII EWi When 

### FrCdUCUCl;

. . .
*In cslculating

tne tax herein levied them rhall be exaluded: (at g8s injectedinte the earth in this State.ualeas oold for euoh.. 

### 683) 

### wnor&le tiorgoIt. shoppar&,

Faga4gas will. reesonebl bring if **prodwed** ***nd aold** **’**
**, eta.**  This definit **T**on, **re~sd as**  **a ubole,**  **md mm-**  &rued fron its four corners,means that the total sale price ie the amount on whim the tox levlod by t;zis

Act must be computcrd.Any ,othercysuotion of enis definitionwould destroy it. wst be **true, because**  t;lc ver)~ statutory **dafini** tion **adda t3**  **the rclue**  of the gnr the vtlue of everythingthat the producermay get for it in additionto auah w&w. Evidentlyit was not the **intontfon** of the lagialature DO hrve mote than **om** rrtmdardof v~lua, and such would be the aase lf :I. it **ware held**  that **in mate**  **lnatascce8** %arket valmei **in the**  **twdinary waning**  **of th6t**  **tern is**  maxat, **wLile in**  **other** inetmwes the aale price ie m-8 is tbc R"

oduaer sella for more tbtm the *ma&e8 valw'.

lie tcmiinmlogyto be 8pplied to the **eddib$smul. psytbsnt,**  **‘ such**  **as whetner**  **it** i8 **Wit be**  **d*swn8in~to4** **a Mm** * **.u** 8 pmi~, would appear to bo M litt&LII rbmant. 'Ckrb3ial.y it'uaaa pure of ths.cou~ideratlon for the

l le aS the gas that uais

aOtu&lly **produaod** and sold. PresuaaI.il.ythe.prtb**d\rcer was**  **unGilll.ng** to sell pas below **a** crrtei:i ntw vtlty, and I.4

the cerboublmk plent doo%r*d 8imllsr quantities OS gas, it #LO at111 nquLred ,to'par'W rir Saw aiuount

for sach &US as it dld,taka. Su8hW%&t&~l papaat W8 e pax% of +Ae tow1 gross reaeipts**raa8iWti** by **the prodrloef-for**  the **ea.&e** of **its .gas.** 

In the light of tue languageof ttce 194.l dot rad of the SupreneCourt 6pkni0naootruing.the 8-0, we ue of the spiaion tbrt the **.t&xab.ble vrlua**  **of thr**  **@a w&r**  th0 **19&A act**  **was the**  **total WLOIALI~**  **of money**  

### roe&rod **W&F -0**  **aeatraot by**  **the produuorP~** 

**Fcrurs Vkly**  **yuiT**
~'fT~Rt;'iE-f

Gi%XX~L **OF** TUA3
No. 1,679.

#### MUNGES, Respondent, *v.*BARNES, Appellant.

*Appeal from District Court, Granite Countyj Welling Nap-ton, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeals.

Decided July 7, 1902.

*Mr. W. É. Moore,*for Appellant.

*Mr. Joshua Shull, Messrs. Durfee & Brown,*and *Mr. George*A. *Maywood,*for Respondent.

Pee Oueiam.

— Tbe motion herein to dismiss the appeal from the judgment and the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, is hereby sustained, and the appeals are accordingly dismissed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12151 and #12152]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of North Dakota (FEMA–1907–DR), dated 04/30/2010. *Incident:*
                         Flooding *Incident Period:*
                         02/26/2010 and continuing. *Effective Date:*
                         04/30/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/29/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/31/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 
                    ( print page 26297)
                    04/30/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Barnes, Benson, Cass, Dickey, Emmons, Foster, Grand Forks, Lamoure, Logan, Mercer, Morton, Nelson, Pembina, Ramsey, Ransom, Richland, Sargent, Steele, Stutsman, Traill, Walsh, Wells. And the portions of the Spirit Lake Reservation that lie within these counties. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 121516 and for economic injury is 121526. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Joseph P. Loddo, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010–11062 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       8,011,257
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            21,900,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,833,545
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 34,288,427
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      10,621,257
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,340,175
<LOANS>                                    128,959,676
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,987,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             211,154,279
<DEPOSITS>                                 191,100,661
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,399,327
<LONG-TERM>                                    385,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,004,495
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,064,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             211,154,279
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,862,643
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,199,933
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               447,687
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,510,263
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,723,474
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,476
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,740,950
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,224,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,633,439
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,633,439
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   985,120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.80
<LOANS-NON>                                    313,476
<LOANS-PAST>                                    44,883
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,163,349
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  225,158
<RECOVERIES>                                    49,242
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,987,433
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,699,296
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        288,137
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Gabriel Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Keith R. Feilmeier, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gabriel Technologies Corporation, and will be retained by Gabriel Technologies Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/   Keith R. Feilmeier

Keith R. Feilmeier, Chief Executive Officer,

President, Director and Principal Executive

Officer

Date:  December 13, 2004
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 24, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 24, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0547. MILTON JOHNSON v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

0392113
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1744 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 329
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1744

                          [Report No. 106-194]

  To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that certain 
   species conservation reports shall continue to be required to be 
                               submitted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 1999

    Mr. Chafee, from the Committee on Environment and Public Works, 
 reported the following original bill; which was read twice and placed 
                            on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that certain 
   species conservation reports shall continue to be required to be 
                               submitted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN SPECIES CONSERVATION 
              REPORTS.

    (a) Annual Cost Analysis.--Section 18 of the Endangered Species Act 
of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1544) is amended by striking ``On'' and inserting 
``Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public Law 104-66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 
note; 109 Stat. 734), on''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section takes 
effect on the earlier of--
            (1) the date of enactment of this Act; or
            (2) December 19, 1999.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 329

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1744

                          [Report No. 106-194]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that certain 
   species conservation reports shall continue to be required to be 
                               submitted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 18, 1999

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                          Trademark Transfer Agreement

Transferor: Duoyuan Clean Water Technology Industries (China) Co., Ltd.
Address: 5th Floor, No. 3 Jinyuan Road, Daxing Industrial Development Zone,
Beijing

Transferee: Duoyuan Investments Limited
Address: British Virgin Islands

Party A and Party B reach the following agreement regarding the transfer of
trademarks through consultation according to the principles of willingness and
equality, arms-length and good faith.

I.    Party A shall transfer the trademark "MHW" registered under its name in
      category 11, numbered 1618029 to Party B. Party A will transfer the
      abovementioned trademarks to Party B with no monetary consideration.

II.   Party A will assist Party B in connection with the registration of such
      trademark transfer, especially including providing all documents and
      formalities required for such trademark transfer. Party A guarantees the
      authenticity, validity and legality of such documents and formalities, and
      undertakes to deliver such documents and formalities to Party B after
      execution of this Agreement.

III.  Application for trademark transfer hereunder shall be submitted to
      Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce for
      approval. Certification for Approval of Trademark Transfer and Notice for
      Approval of Trademark Transfer shall be issued upon approval.

IV.   Party B shall bear all expenses incurred in connection with such trademark
      transfer.

V.    Both Party A and Party B undertake to abide by this Agreement, and shall
      bear corresponding responsibilities for breach of contract.

VI.   Any matter that is not covered herein shall be discussed and agreed upon
      between the parties separately.

VII.  This Agreement is made in two original copies with the same legal effect.
      Party A and Party B shall hold one copy each.

VIII. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties.


Party A: (Company Stamp)
Transferor: Duoyuan Clean Water Technology Industries (China) Co., Ltd.
By: Wenhua Guo
/s/ Wenhua Guo
----------------

December 1, 2007


Party B: (Company Stamp)
Transferee: Duoyuan Investments Limited
By: Wenhua Guo
/s/ Wenhua Guo
----------------

December 1, 2007
#### BEER, Respondent, *v.*LIENEMAN et al., Appellants.

(No. 1,375.)

(Submitted November 18, 1901.

Decided November 18, 1901.)

*Appeal*— Buies *of the Supreme Gourt*— Briefs—Affirmance *of Judgment.*

"Where appellant’s brief fails to comply with the requirements of Subdivision 3 of Rule S of the Supreme Court, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

*Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; John Lindsay, Judge.*

Action by Samson Beer against Lonis Lieneman and Charles Scbmidt. Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and an order denying a new trial, the defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

*Mr. James W. Forbis,*for Appellants.

*Messrs. McBride & McBride,*for Respondent.

MR. JUSTICE PIGOTT

delivered the opinion of the court.

These are appeals from a final judgment and ani order denying a new trial entered in the district court of Silver Bow ■county. The cause was submitted by the appellants on brief, examination of which discloses that it fails to comply with Subdivision 3 of Rule X of this court *(22*Mont, xxxiv, *57*Pac. vii). It does not refer to the page numbers in the transcript; it does not contain any specification of error; nor does it even attempt to state from what either appeal was taken. Such being the condition of the brief, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed upon the authority of *Harrington*v. *Smith, 25*Montana, 111, 63 Pacific Reporter, 1036.

The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
ex4-20.htm


    Exhibit
4.20

    


    MEMORANDUM
ON ADJUSTMENT OF RENT OF LAND USE RIGHTS

    


    


    Pursuant
to the Notice on Adjustment of
Rent of Land Use Rights (zhongguoshihuacaichan [2006] No. 22) in 2006,
and the Memorandum on
Adjustment of Rent of Land Use Rights, dated March 31, 2006, each made by
and between China Petrochemical Corporation ("Sinopec Group Company") and China
Petroleum & Chemical Corporation ("Sinopec"), it is acknowledged that the
total area of land leased from Sinopec Group Company by Sinopec is
436,932,951.23 square meters and the annual rent payable for the leased land is
RMB 3,234,411,222.42.  Sinopec Group Company and Sinopec, after
arm’s-length negotiations, hereby agree to adjust the rent of land use rights
payable for 2008 as follows:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              I.

            	
              Reduce
      the land leased by Sinopec from Sinopec Group Company by 20,219,428.80
      square meters, as returned by Sinopec, and reduce rent of land use rights
      payable for the returned land by RMB 263,049,809.85 (calculated based on
      the rent standard for land use rights in
2007).

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              II.

            	
              Increase
      the rent of land use rights payable for 2008 by RMB 1,263,066,309.56, and
      the rent of land use rights payable for 2008 is accordingly increased to
      RMB 4,234,427,722.13.

            


    

    


    After the
adjustment, the total area of land leased by Sinopec is 416,713,522.44 square
meters and the rent of land use rights payable to Sinopec Group Company by
Sinopec for 2008 is RMB 4,234,427,722.13.

    
 

    China
Petrochemical Corporation

    /s/ Su
Shulin

    August 22,
2008

    


    


    China
Petroleum & Chemical Corporation

    /s/ Wang
Tianpu

    August 22,
2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             154
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             330
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     60,095
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,109
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,971
<LOANS>                                        163,651
<ALLOWANCE>                                        967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,399
<DEPOSITS>                                     188,895
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,120
<LONG-TERM>                                     35,560
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               13
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 245,399
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,947
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,034
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,981
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,531
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,450
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    458
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         309
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       309
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.51
<LOANS-NON>                                        273
<LOANS-PAST>                                       900
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    363
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   969
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  967
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               255
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 1,897.

#### STATE ex rel. NEIHOF, Relator, *v.*OLSON, Justice of the Peace, Respondent.

*Original*— D *ertiorari.*

Decided December 11, 1902.

*Mr. C. M.*Parr, and *Mr. G. J. Langford,*for Relator.

Pee Curiam:.

— The application for a writ of *certiorari*herein is denied.