alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             211
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            3395
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        467
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          28379
<ALLOWANCE>                                        176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33059
<DEPOSITS>                                       17672
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1062
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       14315
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   33059
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   2257
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   27
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   375
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  2659
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 975
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 975
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             1684
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       24
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    760
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         760
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.02
<LOANS-NON>                                        581
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   152
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  176
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               176
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Order entered January 27 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 22
- 01052
- CR
DRESEYON ISIAH OWENS , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 203 rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F20
- 41487
O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. On December 20, 2022, we struck volume 2 of the “sealed” clerk’s record because it did not contain a sealing order , and we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file by December 30, 2022, a volume 2 of the clerk’s record that either was not under seal or that contained the order signed by the trial court sealing the documents

. We also ordered that appellant’s brief would be due thirty days after volume 2 of the clerk’s record was refiled. As of the date of thisorder, the Dallas County District Clerk has not refiled volume 2 of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, appellant’s bri ef is not yet due, and we DENY appellant’s motion for extension of time as premature. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6(a) (appellant’s brief due 30 days after the date the clerk’s record or reporter’s record is filed).
The clerk’s record does not contain appellan t’s request for the clerk’s record , so we cannot determine whether appellant requested the items contained in volume 2 of the clerk’s record. Therefore, the Court ORDERS appellant’s counsel to notify this Court in writing within FOURTEEN DAYS FROM THE DAT E OF
THIS ORDER whether the documents contained in volume 2 of the clerk’s record are necessary to appellant’s appeal. When the Court receives the notification from appellant’s counsel, the Court will determine whether to pursue proper filing of volume 2 and set the briefing schedule accordingly. If appellant’s counsel does not file the required notice within fourteen days, the Court may assume the documents are not necessary to the appeal , consider the appellate record complete , and order appellant’s bri ef filed

.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Date


AMENDMENT TO OFFER LETTER

This Amendment to Offer Letter is made and entered into this 14th day of May 2009 by and between Rackspace US, Inc. (the "Company") and John Lionato ("Lionato").

WHEREAS, Lionato's offer letter from the Company dated April 3, 2008 ("Offer Letter") sets forth certain severance obligations in the event of a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason any time prior to one year from Lionato's start date; and

WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has determined to extend such period until December 31, 2009.

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:




	Defined terms used herein and otherwise not defined herein shall have the meanings as set forth in the Offer Letter.


	Section 7 of the Offer Letter is amended to read in full as follows:




	Severance Benefit.  If you are terminated without Cause or resign for Good Reason at any time prior to December 31, 2009, in addition to any accrued but unpaid Base Salary, accrued vacation and unpaid business expense reimbursements (the "Accrued Obligations") the Company agrees to provide severance payment in the amount of $330,000 payable in twelve equal monthly installments.  Upon termination of employment for any other reason, including in the event of your death or disability, the Company's obligation shall be limited to the Accrued Obligations.

For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Cause" shall mean (a) the commission of, or plea of guilty or no contest to, a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude or the commission of any other act involving willful malfeasance or material fiduciary breach with respect to the Company or an affiliate, (b) gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to the Company or an affiliate.  The Board of Directors of Parent or its delegate, in its absolute discretion, shall determine the effect of all matters and questions relating to whether you have been discharged for Cause.  "Good Reason" shall mean and will be deemed to exist if, without your consent, (a) you suffer a material diminution in your duties, responsibilities or effective authority or any adverse changes in your title or position, (b) you suffer a reduction of Base Salary, (c) the Company fails to pay any earned compensation or to provide for your vested benefits when due and payable, or (d) any material breach of this offer letter; provided, however, that (i) you must provide written notification of your intention to resign within 60 days after you know of the event or condition giving rise to Good Reason;  (ii) such event or condition is not corrected, in all material respects by the Company within 30 days of its receipt of such notice; and (iii) you actually resign your employment with the Company not more than 30 days following the expiration of such 30-day period.


This Amendment to Offer Letter is executed as of the date first written above:

	
RACKSPACE US, INC.



By: /s/ Wayne Roberts____________________          

     Wayne Roberts, Vice President, HR
	


 

/s/ John Lionato_____________________      

John Lionato
18

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Supreme Court

Town of Sullivan's Island, Petitioner,

v.

Michael Murray, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2021-001260

______________

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

______________

Appeal from Charleston County

Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

______________

Opinion No. 28153

Submitted April 3, 2023 – Filed April 26, 2023

______________

AFFIRMED IN RESULT 

______________

John Joseph Dodds, III, of The Law Firm of Cisa & 

Dodds, LLP, of Mt. Pleasant; and George Trenholm 

Walker and John Phillips Linton, Jr., of Walker Gressette 

Freeman & Linton, LLC, of Charleston, all for Petitioner.

Mary Duncan Shahid, of Nexsen Pruet, LLC, and

Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., of Butler Snow, LLP, both 

of Charleston, for Respondent.

______________
19

PER CURIAM: Respondent was convicted in a municipal court bench trial of 

violating Sullivan's Island Town Code sections 21-75 and 5-10 (the ordinances). 

The municipal court imposed a $1040 fine as punishment. On direct appeal, the 

circuit court affirmed the conviction. The court of appeals reversed, holding the 

ordinances were unconstitutionally vague and failed to provide Respondent with 

fair notice his actions would result in a criminal violation. In addition, the court 

held the Town of Sullivan's Island failed to present evidence the dock built by 

Respondent interfered with navigation or extended into the channel in violation of 

the ordinance. Town of Sullivan's Island v. Murray, 435 S.C. 22, 864 S.E.2d 909 

(Ct. App. 2021). 

Because we agree with the court of appeals that there was no evidence Respondent 

violated any provision of the ordinance, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari 

to the court of appeals, dispense with briefing, and affirm the result of the court of 

appeals' opinion reversing Respondent's conviction.

AFFIRMED IN RESULT.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, FEW, JAMES and HILL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.22





Exhibit 4.22





Summary of Form Revolving Credit Facility Agreement



In 2008, our wholly-owned subsidiaries Ctrip Computer Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Ctrip
Travel Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Ctrip Travel Network Technology (Shanghai)
Co., Ltd. and our consolidated affiliated Chinese entity, Shanghai Huacheng Southwest Travel Agency
Co., Ltd., or the “Ctrip Borrowers,” each entered into substantially identical agreements with
China Merchants Bank, Shanghai Branch, or the “Lender,” for revolving credit facilities of RMB50
million.



The revolving credit facilities are valid from April 16, 2009 through April 15, 2010. Loans
made to each of the Ctrip Borrowers under the facilities by the Borrower and interests, penalties
and additional costs incurred by the Lender to enforce its rights and privileges are jointly
guaranteed in full by other Ctrip Borrowers. The Ctrip Borrowers may not transfer debt incurred
under the facilities to third parties without the consent of the Lender and must inform and take
measures to preserve the rights and privileges of the Lender in the case of corporate
restructuring, significant and material financial losses and other material events that may impact
the ability of the Ctrip Borrowers to repay the outstanding debt incurred under the facilities.



The facilities are governed by laws of the People’s Republic of China, and disputes occurring
over the facilities shall be adjudicated by the local people’s court at the Lender’s location.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NOVA CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          32,574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,191
<INVENTORY>                                     11,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,505
<PP&E>                                         120,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 734,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,281
<BONDS>                                        238,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           737
<OTHER-SE>                                     390,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   734,011
<SALES>                                         37,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,466,639
<CGS>                                           16,378
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,314,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,711
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,243
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,468
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2246

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that certain small

businesses are permitted to use the cash method of accounting even

if they use merchandise or inventory.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9, 2000

Mr. BOND (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

that certain small businesses are permitted to use the

cash method of accounting even if they use merchandise

or inventory.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Tax

5 Accounting Simplification Act of 2000’’.
2

•S 2246 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CASH ACCOUNTING RULES FOR

2 SMALL BUSINESS.

3 Section 446 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

4 (relating to general rule for methods of accounting) is

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section:

7 ‘‘(g) SMALL BUSINESS TAXPAYERS PERMITTED TO

8 USE CASH ACCOUNTING METHOD WITHOUT LIMITA9 TION.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a tax10 payer shall not be required to use an accrual method of

11 accounting for any taxable year, if the average annual

12 gross receipts of such taxpayer (or any predecessor) for

13 the 3-year-period ending with the preceding taxable year

14 does not exceed $5,000,000. The rules of paragraphs (2)

15 and (3) of section 448(c) shall apply for purposes of the

16 preceding sentence. In the case of a C corporation or a

17 partnership which has a C corporation as a partner, the

18 first sentence of this subsection shall apply only if such

19 C corporation or partnership meets the requirements of

20 section 448(b)(3).’’.

21 (b) CLARIFICATION OF INVENTORY RULES FOR

22 SMALL BUSINESS.—Section 471 of the Internal Revenue

23 Code of 1986 (relating to general rule for inventories) is

24 amended by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d)

25 and by inserting after subsection (b) the following new

26 subsection:
3

•S 2246 IS

1 ‘‘(c) SMALL BUSINESS SERVICE PROVIDERS NOT RE2 QUIRED TO USE INVENTORIES.—A taxpayer shall not be

3 required to use inventories under this section for a taxable

4 year if the amounts paid for merchandise sold during the

5 preceding taxable year were less than 50 percent of the

6 gross receipts received during such preceding taxable year.

7 For purposes of this subsection, gross receipts for any tax8 able year shall be reduced by returns and allowances made

9 during such year.’’.

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 29, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 29, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0333. WM. MORGAN AKIN et al v. SCOTTY L. KEY et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

SUCV2023001445
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1122]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-101896-09]
RIN 1545-BI66


Basis Reporting by Securities Brokers and Basis Determination for 
Stock; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to a notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking that was published in the Federal Register on Thursday, 
December 17, 2009, relating to reporting sales of securities by brokers 
and determining the basis of securities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations 
under section 1012, Edward C. Schwartz, (202) 622-4960; Concerning the 
proposed regulations under sections 3406, 6045, 6045A, 6045B, 6721, and 
6722, Stephen Schaeffer, (202) 622-4910 (not toll-free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    A notice of proposed rulemaking that is the subject of this 
document is under sections 408, 1012, 6039, 6042, 6044, 6045, 6045A, 
6045B and 6049 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-101896-09), 
published Thursday, December 17, 2009 (74 FR 67010), contains errors 
that may prove to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(REG-101896-09), which was the subject of FR Doc. E9-29855, is 
corrected as follows:
    1. On page 67013, column 3, in the preamble, under paragraph 
heading ``a. Form and Manner of New Broker Reporting Requirements'', 
last line of the first paragraph of the column, the language ``pub/irs-
dft/f1099k-dft.pdf.'' is corrected to read ``pub/irs-dft/f1099b--
dft.pdf.''.


Sec.  1.6045-1  [Corrected]

    2. On page 67035, column 2, paragraph (f)(2)(i), lines 6 thru 8, 
the language ``shall show on Form 1099, ``U.S. Information Return for 
Calendar Year 1971,'' or any successor form the name,'' is corrected to 
read ``shall show on Form 1099-B, ``Proceeds from Broker and Barter 
Exchange Transactions,'' or any successor form the name''.

Guy R. Traynor,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2010-1122 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.43

                            OFFICER'S PROMISSORY NOTE

         The undersigned officer of Big Buck Brewery & Steakhouse, Inc., Anthony
P. Dombrowski of 768 Crestwood Dr., Gaylord, Michigan 49735, does hereby promise
to pay to the order of Big Buck Brewery & Steakhouse, Inc., the sum of Twelve
Thousand Dollars ($12,000) with annual interest thereon of 8 3/4%. Said interest
payable monthly. The term of this note shall be for a period of 1 year
commencing on the date hereof. Upon maturity of the note, the undersigned hereby
agrees to discharge the principle interest in its entirety. This note can be
prepaid at anytime during the term of the note.


April 18, 2000                              /s/ Anthony P. Dombrowski
---------------------------                 -----------------------------------
Date                                        Anthony P. Dombrowski
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2069

AN ACT

To permit the conveyance of certain land in Powell,

Wyoming.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2069 ES

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF PUBLIC PURPOSE CONDI2 TION.

3 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that—

4 (1) the parcel of land described in subsection

5 (c) was patented to the town (now City) of Powell,

6 Wyoming, by the United States General Land Office

7 on October 17, 1934, to help establish a town near

8 the Shoshone Irrigation Project;

9 (2) the land was patented with the condition

10 that it be used forever for a public purpose, as re11 quired by section 3 of the Act of April 16, 1906 (43

12 U.S.C. 566);

13 (3) the land has been used to house the Powell

14 Volunteer Fire Department, which serves the fire15 fighting and rescue needs of a 577 square mile area

16 in northwestern Wyoming;

17 (4) the land is located at the corner of U.S.

18 Highway 14 and the main street of the business dis19 trict of the City;

20 (5) because of the high traffic flow in the area,

21 the location is no longer safe for the public or for

22 the fire department;

23 (6) in response to population growth in the area

24 and to National Fire Protection Association regula25 tions, the fire department has purchased new fire-
3

S 2069 ES

1 fighting equipment that is much larger than the ex2 isting fire hall can accommodate;

3 (7) accordingly, the fire department must con4 struct a new fire department facility at a new and

5 safe location;

6 (8) in order to relocate and construct a new fa7 cility, the City must sell the land to assist in financ8 ing the new fire department facility; and

9 (9) the Secretary of the Interior concurs that it

10 is in the public interest to eliminate the public pur11 pose condition to enable the land to be sold for that

12 purpose.

13 (b) ELIMINATION OF CONDITION.—

14 (1) WAIVER.—The condition stated in section 3

15 of the Act of April 16, 1906 (43 U.S.C. 566), that

16 land conveyed under that Act be used forever for a

17 public purpose is waived insofar as the condition ap18 plies to the land described in subsection (c).

19 (2) INSTRUMENTS.—The Secretary of the Inte20 rior shall execute and cause to be recorded in the

21 appropriate land records any instruments necessary

22 to evidence the waiver made by paragraph (1).

23 (c) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The parcel of land de24 scribed in this subsection is a parcel of land located in
4

S 2069 ES

1 Powell, Park County, Wyoming, the legal description of

2 which is as follows:

3 Lot 23, Block 54, in the original town of Pow4 ell, according to the plat recorded in Book 82 of

5 plats, Page 252, according to the records of the

6 County Clerk and Recorder of Park County, State of

7 Wyoming.

Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2069

AN ACT

To permit the conveyance of certain land in Powell,

Wyoming.