alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1

[ACNIELSEN LOGO]



                                     CONSENT

We hereby consent to the use of information from our monthly reports "Audit
Report Beer and Soft Drink", covering the period January 1993 to December 2003,
on Form 20-F of Quilmes Industrial (QUINSA Societe Anonyme). We further consent
to the use of our name in such Form 20-F, and to the filing of this consent as
an exhibit thereto and to the incorporation of this consent into any
registration statement that Quinsa may file.


/s/ Adrian Sarrica


A.C. Nielsen S.A. de C.V. Sucursal Argentina
Adrian Sarrica
Apoderado
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11439]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than May 28, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Hilario John Arguinchona and Karen Arguinchona, Boise, Idaho; to 
retain voting shares of Syringa Bancorp, and thereby indirectly retain 
voting shares Syringa Bank, both of Boise, Idaho.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 10, 2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-11439 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Burke *v.*Wilkes-Barre Township School District

(No. 2).

Argued Jan. 11, 1905.

Appeal, No. 51, Jan. T., 1905, by Mary Burke, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Dec. T., 1901, No. 186, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mary Burke v. The School District of the Township of Wilkes-Barre.

Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Orlady, Smith, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, Jj.

Affirmed.

*22April 17, 1905:

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

This case, in which the plaintiff is sister to the plaintiff in No. 50, January Term 1905, ante, p. 16, is similar in all respects to that, except as to the matter of monthly compensation. The cases were tried together and what is said in the previous case applies equally to this.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the former case, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the smaller amount in this. ' The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                    MONARCH DENTAL CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES


Monarch Dental Corporation

Partners Dental Corporation

Monarch Dental Associates, L.P.

MacGregor Dental Associates, L.P.

Monarch Dental Management, Inc.

Modern Dental Professionals, P.C.

Midwest Dental Care, Mondovi, Inc.

Midwest Dental Care, Sheboygan, Inc.

Midwest Dental Management, Inc.

Monarch Dental Associates (Arkansas), Inc.

Modern Dental Professionals - Girlinghouse, P.A.

Modern Dental Professionals - St. Raymond (a Professional Dental Corporation)

Dental Centers of Indiana (Monarch), Inc.

DCI, Lee, L.P.

Drs. Johnson, Terry and Associates, L.P.

Modern Dental Professionals - Indiana, P.C.

Three Peaks Dental Management, Inc.

Modern Dental Professionals - Colorado, P.C.

Monarch Dental (Press) Associates, L.P.

Monarch Dental Associates (Midland/Odessa), L.P.
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC17-839

____________

MARK A. TWILEGAR, 

Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

[November 2, 2017]

PER CURIAM.

Mark A. Twilegar, a prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the circuit 

court’s order denying his successive motion for postconviction relief filed under 

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 seeking relief from his death sentence 

pursuant to Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and Hurst v. State, 202 So. 3d 

40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017). We have jurisdiction. See art.

V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 

As the circuit court correctly recognized, the Hurst decisions do not apply to 

defendants like Twilegar who waived a penalty phase jury. See Mullens v. State, 

197 So. 3d 16, 38-40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 672 (2017); see also
- 2 -

Brant v. State, 197 So. 3d 1051, 1079 (Fla. 2016). Although Twilegar urges this 

Court to revisit, in light of the Hurst decisions, its prior holding in Twilegar’s 

direct appeal that his waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, see Twilegar

v. State, 42 So. 3d 177, 204 (Fla. 2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1225 (2011), that 

argument is without merit. See Mullens, 197 So. 3d at 39-40 (explaining that a 

defendant “cannot subvert the right to jury factfinding by waiving that right and 

then suggesting that a subsequent development in the law has fundamentally 

undermined his sentence”). Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s denial.

It is so ordered. 

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, 

and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, 

IF FILED, DETERMINED.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Lee County, 

Ramiro Mañalich, Judge - Case No. 362003CF002151000ACH

Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Suzanne Myers Keffer, Chief 

Assistant, and Scott Gavin, Staff Attorney, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, 

Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida,

for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Timothy A. 

Freeland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida,

for Appellee
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Daniel T. Voelpel, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Franklin Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4 The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 13, 2007 /s/ Daniel T Voelpel   Daniel T. Voelpel   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   
18
Cite as 2014 Ark. 100



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-107

ABRAHAM GRANT PETITIONER

v. VERA REYNOLDS, LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK RESPONDENT Opinion Delivered February 27, 2014 PRO SE MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK [LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. UNKNOWN]
MOTION DENIED.

PER CURIAM On January 22, 2014, petitioner Abraham Grant tendered to this court a pro se motion for rule on the Lincoln County Circuit Clerk , alleging that the circuit clerk had failed to perform some duty. As the motion pertained to the circuit clerk, and not the clerk of this court, it was returned to petitioner so that he could proceed with it in circuit court. See Willis v. Circuit Clerk of Sebastian County , 2009 Ark. 515 (per curiam) (A motion for rule on circuit clerk alleging a failure of the clerk to perform a duty was returned to be filed in the circuit court in which the respondent was serving as circuit clerk.). On January 23, 2014, petitioner tendered an amendment to the motion for rule on circuit clerk that was also returned to him. Now before us is petitioner’s pro se motion for rule on the clerk of this court, asking that we direct our clerk to file the motion and amended motion here. The motion for rule on our clerk was not accompanied by a certified record of any proceeding in circuit court. The motion is denied. The circuit court has jurisdiction to consider a claim that its clerk should perform a particular duty. See Willis , 2009 Ark. 515. Petitioner has failed to establish that there is any basis for this court to assume jurisdiction of the matter. Motion denied. Abraham Grant

, pro se petitioner. No response.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                     152,720,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              107,689,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                14,403,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           249,506,000
<PP&E>                                     724,588,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             115,651,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             917,095,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      181,677,000
<BONDS>                                    285,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      403,368,000
<PREFERRED>                                        414
<COMMON>                                       316,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (47,955,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               917,095,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           420,710,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              325,127,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           140,818,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          37,076,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (93,166,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,389,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (94,555,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (94,555,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.75)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
December 31, 1996 financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements. EPS amounts have
been restated to reflect the Company's adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" as of December 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,048
<SECURITIES>                                     3,866
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                        76
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,360
<PP&E>                                         773,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 914,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          266,563
<BONDS>                                        217,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,515
<COMMON>                                           363
<OTHER-SE>                                     291,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   914,524
<SALES>                                        129,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,977
<CGS>                                           36,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,860)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,805
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,196)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,609
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        
    


</TABLE>
M
oe

LK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

—

Me

WEI

National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

4676 Columbia Parkway

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998

Phone: 513-533-6825.

Fax: 513-533-6826

July 28, 2006
SEC00020 .

Peter M. Turcic, Director

Division of Energy Employees Occupational
Tiiness Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

Room C-4511

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20210

Dear Mr. Turcic:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required
by 42 C.F.R. pt. 83.17(c), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a
class of employees at the Pacific Proving Grounds, Enewetak Atoll, as an addition to the Special
Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program
Act of 2000. On Jurie 26, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS
designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

Department of Energy (DOE) employees or DOE contractor or
subcontractor employees who worked at the Pacific Proving Grounds
(PPG) from 1946 through 1962 for a number of work days aggregating
at least 250 work days, either solely under this employment or in
combination with work days within the parameters (excluding
aggregate work day requirements) established for other classes of
employees included in the SEC, and who were monitored or should
have been monitored.

This designation became effective on July 26, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384/(14)(C).
Hence, beginning on July 26, 2006, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this
notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

Sincerely,

. Dan

fafLary J. Elliott, MSPH, CIH
Director
Office of Compensation
Analysis and Support
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Town of Kirkwood, Broome County, New York, by Its Town Board, and of Edwin Smith and Others, as Assessors of Said Town of Kirkwood, Respondents, to Procure the Substitution as Attorneys of Hinman, Howard & Kattell of Binghamton, New York, in the Place and Stead of A. D. Wales and Wales & Riley, Attorneys for Said Assessors Heretofore, Appellants.

Order settled.
EX-10.7






Exhibit 10.7




Trademark Transfer Agreement




Transferor: Duoyuan Clean Water Technology Industries (China) Co., Ltd.

Address: 5th Floor, No. 3 Jinyuan Road, Daxing Industrial Development Zone, Beijing




Transferee: Duoyuan Investments Limited

Address: British Virgin Islands



Party A and Party B reach the following agreement regarding the transfer of trademarks through
consultation according to the principles of willingness and equality, arms-length and good faith.





	I.	 	Party A shall transfer the trademarks “Duoyuan” registered under its name in category 38, 36
and 40 numbered 5830463, 5830480 and 5830481 respectively to Party B. Party A will transfer
the abovementioned trademarks to Party B with no monetary consideration.
	 
	II.	 	Party A will assist Party B in connection with the registration of such trademark transfer, especially including providing
all documents and formalities required for such trademark transfer. Party A guarantees the authenticity, validity and
legality of such documents and formalities, and undertakes to deliver such documents and formalities to Party B after
execution of this Agreement.
	 
	III.	 	Application for trademark transfer hereunder shall be submitted to Trademark Office of the State Administration for
Industry and Commerce for approval. Certification for Approval of Trademark Transfer and Notice for Approval of Trademark
Transfer shall be issued upon approval.
	 
	IV.	 	Party B shall bear all expenses incurred in connection with such trademark transfer.
	 
	V.	 	Both Party A and Party B undertake to abide by this Agreement, and shall bear corresponding
responsibilities for breach of contract.
	 
	 	 	Party B shall pay liquidated damages to Party A for Party B’s breach of contract, and shall
compensate for all losses so incurred by Party A. The detailed terms shall be agreed upon
between the parties separately.
	 
	VI.	 	Any matter that is not covered herein shall be discussed and agreed upon between the parties separately.
	 
	VII.	 	This Agreement is made in two original copies with the same legal effect. Party A and Party B shall hold one copy each.
	 
	VIII.	 	This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties.





Party A: (Company Stamp)

Transferor: Duoyuan Clean Water Technology Industries (China) Co., Ltd.

By: Wenhua Guo

/s/ Wenhua Guo

 


December 1, 2007



Party B: (Company Stamp)

Transferee: Duoyuan Investments Limited

By: Wenhua Guo

/s/ Wenhua Guo

 


December 1, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11688]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Green Technology Pilot Program.
    Form Number(s): PTO/SB/420.
    Agency Approval Number: 0651-0062.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 6,850 hours annually.
    Number of Respondents: 5,225 responses per year.
    Avg. Hours per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take the 
public between 1 hour and 10 hours, depending upon the complexity of 
the situation, to gather the necessary information, prepare the 
appropriate form for documents, and submit the information to the 
USPTO.
    Needs and Uses: This information is required by 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2), 
122(c), 131 and 151 and administered by the USPTO through 37 CFR 1.102, 
1.291 and 1.99. This information collection is necessary so that (i) 
patent applicants may participate in the new streamlined Examination 
Pilot Program for Green Technologies, (ii) the public may protest a 
pending application, and (iii) the public may make a submission in a 
published application.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other 
for-profits; not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser, e-mail: [email protected].
    Once submitted, the request will be publicly available in 
electronic format through the Information Collection Review page at 
http://www.reginfo.gov.
    Paper copies can be obtained by:
     E-mail: [email protected]. Include ``0651-
0062 copy request'' in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan K. 
Fawcett.
     Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, 
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent on or before June 16, 2010 to Nicholas A. 
Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via e-mail at [email protected] 
or by fax to 202-395-5167, marked to the attention of Nicholas A. 
Fraser.

    Dated: May 11, 2010.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-11688 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
```
No. 1,808.

#### STATE ex rel. OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD CO., Relator, *v.*DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Respondent.

*Original*— Mandamus.

Decided June 2, 1902.

*Mr. J. G, Willis,*for Relator.

*Mr. J. E. Healey,*for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

— Upon motion of the relator this cause is dismissed at the cost of said relator.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 14, 2022

NO. 03-22-00359-CV

Joseph McCullough, Appellant

v.

Danielle Weston, in her Representative Capacity as Trustee of the Round Rock 

Independent School District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order issued by the trial court on June 15, 2022. Having reviewed the 

record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.