alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2164

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compound optical microscopes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain compound optical

microscopes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CER4 TAIN COMPOUND OPTICAL MICROSCOPES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:
2

•S 2164 IS

‘‘ 9902.98.07 Compound optical microscopes;

whether or not

stereoscopic and

whether or not

provided with a

means for

photographing

the image; especially designed

for semiconductor inspection; with full encapsulation of all

moving parts

above the stage;

meeting

‘‘cleanroom class

1’’ criteria; having a horizontal

distance between

the optical axis

and C-shape microscope stand of

8’’ or more; and

fitted with special microscope

stages having a

lateral movement

range of 6’’ or

more in each direction and containing special

sample holders

for semiconductor wafers,

devices and

masks (provided

for in heading

9011) ................. Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment

5 of this Act.

Æ
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

MICHAEL L. SELF, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0080 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR1987-009694

The Honorable Roy C. Whitehead, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Krista Wood

Counsel for Respondent

Michael L. Self, Kingman

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge James B. Morse Jr., and Judge 

Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 10-06-2022
STATE v. SELF

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Michael L. Self seeks review of the superior court’s 

order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner’s 

eighth petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 168 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 168

                For the relief of Thomas J. Sansone, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Thomas J. Sansone, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR VACCINE-RELATED INJURY.

    (a) Cause of Injury.--In consideration of the petition filed under 
subtitle 2 of title XXI of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300aa-10 et seq.) (relating to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation 
Program) by the legal representatives of Thomas J. Sansone, Jr., 
including the claims contained in that petition that the injury 
described in that petition was caused by a vaccine covered in the 
Vaccine Injury Table specified in section 2114 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
300aa-14) and given on June 1, 1994, such injury is deemed to have been 
caused by such vaccine for the purposes of subtitle 2 of title XXI of 
such Act.
    (b) Payment.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall pay 
compensation to Thomas J. Sansone, Jr. for the injury referred to in 
subsection (a) in accordance with section 2115 of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa-15).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust II (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding II, L.P. for
the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haig Nargesian, Regular Trustee
of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II


                              By:  /s/ HAIG NARGESIAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Haig Nargesian *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: March 29, 2005
_____________________

* Haig Nargesian functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000743457
<NAME> 83B
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         255,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  273,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               528,876
<PP&E>                                      19,494,603
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,437,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,586,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,523,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,586,264
<SALES>                                      1,077,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,084,873
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  814,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                270,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            270,843
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   270,843
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2375

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain polymer.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 6, 2000

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain

polymer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended in heading 9902.39.07 by striking ‘‘On or before

8 12/31/2001’’ and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2004’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
2

•S 2375 IS

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
Global Med Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-28155, No. 333-39193, No. 333-45031, No. 333-69851, No. 333-60672, No. 333-60674, and No. 333-115686) on Form S-8 and No. 333-131388 on Form SB-2 of Global Med Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary, of our report dated February 22, 2006 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Global Med Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

/s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PCEhrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

Denver, ColoradoMarch 6, 2008

















---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Notice: Amendment of Meeting Time

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of an 
amendment of the meeting of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration (SAMHSA) National Advisory Council to be held 
on May 11-12, 2010.
    Public notice was published in the Federal Register on April 27, 
2010, Vol. 75, No. 80, page 22147, announcing that the SAMHSA National 
Advisory Council would be convening on May 11-12, 2010, at 1 Choke 
Cherry Road, in Rockville, Maryland. The meeting can also be accessed 
by webstream. The time of the meeting changed. The May 11 meeting will 
be held from 9 a.m. to 5:15 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The May 12 
meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. 
The agenda of the meeting and contact for additional information remain 
as announced.

Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health, 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-11390 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Franklin Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 14, 2008
    /s/ Daniel T. VoelpelDaniel T. VoelpelVice President and Chief Financial Officer 18
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Abraham Lehman, Respondent, *v.*Consolidated Fire Alarm Company, Appellant.

First Department,

June 16, 1911.

Mandamus — corporation — inspection of Looks by stockholder.

Where .upon an application by a stockholder for a peremptory -writ of mandamus compelling the corporation to permit him to inspect its books, the relator upon the hearing instead of asking for an alternative m-it stands upon the moving papers and the opposing affidavits he is in the position of a demurrant.

Mandamus -will not issue to compel a corporation to permit a stockholder to inspect its'books and papers if the purpose of such examination is to furnish information to the president of a competing company, and so to - embarrass the respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, the Consolidated Fire Alarm Company, from an order directing that a peremptory writ of man-damns issne commanding the appellant, its officers and agents to permit the relator to examine and inspect its hooks, papers, documents and records and to take extracts therefrom.

*Peter B. Olney,*for the appellant.

*Jay 0. Guggenheimer,*for the respondent.

Miller, J. -:

It is settled in this State that a stockholder has the right for a proper purpose and at a proper time' and place to inspect the hooks of his corporation; and that, if that right is denied him hy the officers of the corporation, the Supreme Court may in its .sound discretion issue a writ of mandamus to compel an inspection. *(Matter of Steinway,*159 N. Y. 250.)

Instead of asking for an alternative writ, the relator stood upon the. moving papers and the opposing affidavits, and he is, therefore, in the position of a demurrant. *(Matter of Steinway, supra,*and cases cited at p. 254 of the opinion.) It is 'charged in the opposing affidavits that the motive of the relator was to obtain information to furnish to the president of a competing company, who had at various times attempted to *428get information ■ as to the appellant’s contracts, prices and methods of doing business; and in support of that charge, affidavits were presented of two persons who had made affidavits for the relator, to the effect that they were procured to make such affidavits by the president of said competing company. An examination will not be allowed for an ulterior purpose or to embarrass the corporation. *(Matter of Pierson,*44 App. Div. 215; *Matter of Kennedy,*75 id. 188; *Matter of Taylor,*117 id. 348.)

The order should be reversed, with ten .dollars costs and disbursements, and the petition denied, with costs.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke and Dowling, JJ., concurred.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 USC Section 1350 (A) and (B)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of F & M Bank Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Dated:  May 12, 2010
    /s/ NEIL W. HAYSLETTNeil W. HayslettExecutive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.7






Exhibit 10.7




EXHIBIT E

to

CENTRAL IOWA ENERGY, LLC TOLL PROCESSING AGREEMENT




EXTENSION OF TERM




This Exhibit E to Central Iowa Energy, LLC Toll Processing Agreement is entered into this
4th day of March, 2009, by and between Central Iowa Energy, LLC, an Iowa limited
liability company, of 3426 East 28th Street North, Newton, Iowa 50208 (“CIE”), REG Marketing &
Logistics Group, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company (“REG Marketing”), of 416 S. Bell Avenue,
PO Box 888, Ames, Iowa 50010 (collectively the “Parties”).



Extension of Term. The Parties agree to extend the Term of the Central Iowa Energy,
LLC Toll Process Agreement as stated in Section 9 thereof from the 30th day of April,
2009, to and including the 30th day of March, 2010. The
unmodified provisions of Section 9 and of said Agreement remain in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Central Iowa Energy, LLC and REG Marketing & Logistics Group, LLC have
each duly and appropriately executed this Exhibit E as of the date first shown above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	CENTRAL IOWA ENERGY, LLC	 	 	 	REG MARKETING & 
LOGISTICS GROUP, LLC
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ James Johnston
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Nile D. Ramsbottom
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name: James Johnston
	 	 	 	 	 	Name: Nile D. Ramsbottom
	 

	 	Title:   Chairman
	 	 	 	 	 	Title:   President
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.0
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of NeoMagic Corporation of our report dated February 12, 1999, included in
the 1999 Annual Report to Stockholders of NeoMagic Corporation.
 
    Our audits also include the financial statement schedule of NeoMagic
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
    We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Forms S-8 No. 333-30843 and 333-57217) of our report dated February
12, 1999, with respect to the financial statements incorporated herein by
reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
NeoMagic Corporation.
 
                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
San Jose, California
April 28, 1999