alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11



Statement re computation of per-share earnings



Basic per share data is calculated based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reported period. Diluted per share data includes any
dilution from potential common stock outstanding, such as the exercise of stock options.



|                                                                              |  |                                 |            |                                 |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------------------- | - | --------- |  | ---- | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                                                              |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, |            | Three Months EndedSeptember 30,
|                                                                              |  | 2005                            |            | 2004                            |   | 2005      |  | 2004
|Numerator:                                                                    |  |                                 |            |                                 |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Net income                                                                    |  | $                               | 10,482,000 |                                 | $ | 8,915,000 |  | $    | 3,401,000 |  | $ | 3,161,000
|                                                                              |  |                                 |            |                                 |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Denominator:                                                                  |  |                                 |            |                                 |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Denominator for basic income per share - weighted average shares              |  |                                 | 8,164,445  |                                 |   | 8,162,450 |  |      | 8,165,750 |  |   | 8,158,011
|Dilutive potential common shares - employee stock options                     |  |                                 | 15,444     |                                 |   | 27,056    |  |      | 17,001    |  |   | 24,403   
|                                                                              |  |                                 |            |                                 |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          
|Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares |  |                                 | 8,179,889  |                                 |   | 8,189,506 |  |      | 8,182,751 |  |   | 8,182,414
|                                                                              |  |                                 |            |                                 |   |           |  |      |           |  |   |          



36
98d Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 99-36B

VETO MESSAGE-H.R. 10626

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

VETOING H.R. 10626, AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR TO SELL RESERVED PHOSPHATE INTERESTS OF THE UNITED STATES IN CERTAIN

LANDS IN FLORIDA TO JOHN CARTER AND MARTHA B.

CARTER

SiTEMumm 30, 1974.-Message and accompanying act referred to the

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and ordered to be printed

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

93d Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 93-368

33-011 0 WASHINGTON : 1974
To the Houe of Representatives:

I return herewith, without my approval, H.R. 10626, a bill that

directs the Secretary of the Interior to convey all phosphate interests

of the United States in approximately 40 acres in Polk County, Florida to John Carter and Martha B. Carter upon payment of administrative costs and the fair market value of the phosphate interests.

Present law provides that phosphate interests of the United States

shall be disposed of under a leasing system. The Congress and the

Executive Branch have developed an alternative policy of selling phosphate and other mineral interests when the surface is not owned

by the United States and when at least one of two criteria is met. The

criteria are that the mineral interests have no value or that they interfere with development of the surface that is more beneficial than

mineral development. This policy is carried out through private legis- lation on a case-by-case basis, and it is solely for the benefit and convenience of surface owners.

The instant case meets neither of the two criteria. The land is pro- spectively valuable for phosphates, and we know of no proposed use

of the surface with which the mineral interest would interfere. The

land is presently being used for grazing cattle.

At least six private bills have been enacted to convey reserved mineral interests in the 93rd Congress, and every one of them has met one

of the criteria. There are presently several private bills still pending before this Congress. Also pending is the Administration's proposed "National Resource Lands Management Act", and a similar Senatepassed proposal, S. 424, which would give the Secretary of the Interior general authority to convey mineral interests to surface owners

when one of the criteria is met. It is therefore clear that enactment

into law of H.R. 10626 would conflict with established policy and

would confuse our action on similar proposals in the future.

For these reasons I feel that the approval of H.R. 10626 would not

be desirable.

GERALD R. FoRD.

THE WHITE HOUSE, September 30, 1974.
Village Green - Second Amendment



Exhibit 10.59

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT

           
This Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Contract (this “Amendment”) is
made as of May 27 2009, between CONCAP VILLAGE GREEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
(“Seller”) and PMF ENTERPRISES CF INC. (“Purchaser”).

W I T N E S S E T H:

           
WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into a Purchase and Sale Contract
dated as of March 20, 2009 (as amended by that certain First Amendment to
Purchase and Sale Contract, dated April 29, 2009, collectively, the
“Agreement”) with respect to the sale of certain property known as
Village Green Apartments and located in Seminole County, Florida, as described
in the Agreement; and

           
WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser desire to amend the Agreement on the terms
set forth herein. 

           
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein
contained, the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the
mutual receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereby agree as follows:

1.     
Capitalized Terms.     Capitalized terms used
in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement, except
as expressly otherwise defined herein.

2.     
Loan Assumption Approval Period.  The Loan Assumption
Approval Period, set forth in Section 4.5.9 of the Agreement, is hereby extended
to June 10, 2009. 

3.     
Miscellaneous.          
This Amendment (a)  supersedes all prior oral or written communications
and agreement between or among the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof, and (b) may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute a
single instrument and may be delivered by facsimile transmission, and any such
facsimile transmitted Amendment shall have the same force and effect, and be as
binding, as if original signatures had been delivered.  As modified hereby,
all the terms of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall
continue in full force and effect.

[Signature Page to Follow]


           
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date and year hereinabove written.

 

Seller:

 

CONCAP VILLAGE GREEN ASSOCIATES, LTD., a
Texas limited partnership

 

By: 
CCP/III VILLAGE GREEN GP, INC., a South Carolina corporation, its general
partner

 

By: 
/s/Brian J. Bornhorst

Name: 
Brian J. Bornhorst

Title: 
Vice President

Purchaser:

PMF ENTERPRISES CF,
INC.,
a Florida corporation

By: 
/s/Jerry Weston

Name: 
Jerry Weston
Title:  President
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7131** 

ANTONIO KENON , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v.
MIKE HARDEE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. ( 5:13

- hc

- 02245

- D )

Submitted : December 16, 2014 Decided: February 3, 2015

Before SHEDD, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Antonio Kenon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Kenon seeks to appeal the district court’s order s dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his motion f or reconsideration . The order s

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a c onstitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional cl aims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedur al ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kenon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly , we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2120

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to establish

teacher recruitment and professional development programs for rural

areas, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 29, 2000

Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

of 1965 to establish teacher recruitment and professional

development programs for rural areas, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RURAL TEACHER PROGRAMS.

4 Part A of title II of the Elementary and Secondary

5 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6621 et seq.) is amend6 ed by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 2120 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 2104. RURAL TEACHERS.

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may award grants

3 on a competitive basis to rural eligible local educational

4 agencies to carry out activities described in subsection (b).

5 ‘‘(b) USE OF FUNDS.—A rural eligible local edu6 cational agency that receives a grant under this section

7 may use the funds made available through the grant to

8 develop incentive programs—

9 ‘‘(1) to recruit and retain qualified teachers;

10 and

11 ‘‘(2) to provide high-quality professional devel12 opment to teachers.

13 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant

14 under this section, a rural eligible local educational agency

15 shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time,

16 in such manner, and containing such information as the

17 Secretary may reasonably require.

18 ‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

19 ‘‘(1) METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA.—The

20 term ‘metropolitan statistical area’ has the meaning

21 given such term by the Bureau of the Census.

22 ‘‘(2) RURAL ELIGIBLE LOCAL EDUCATIONAL

23 AGENCY.—The term ‘rural eligible local educational

24 agency’ means a local educational agency—

25 ‘‘(A) that is not located in a metropolitan

26 statistical area; and
3

•S 2120 IS

1 ‘‘(B) in which there is a high percentage

2 (as determined by the Secretary) of individuals

3 from families with incomes below the poverty

4 line (as defined by the Office of Management

5 and Budget, and revised annually in accordance

6 with section 673(2) of the Community Services

7 Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2))) applica8 ble to a family of the size involved.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.3





Written
Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(“Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.





Date:
March 16, 2010





/s/
      JOEL M. BENNETTJOEL
      M. BENNETTChief
      Financial Officer
No. 1,847.

#### BURNS, Appellant, *v.*KELLY et al., Respondents.

*Appeal from District Court, Powell County; Welling Nap-ton, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided October 7, 1902.

*550
      *Mr. George B.*Winston, for Appellant.

*Mr.*W. *U. Trippet,*for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

— Respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal herein is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
#### Gilbert H. Hawley, Respondent, v. Charles A. Borst, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           5,302
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,516
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     36,089
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,628
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,172
<LOANS>                                        137,194
<ALLOWANCE>                                        937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,667
<DEPOSITS>                                     183,457
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                957
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,457
<COMMON>                                            13
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 209,667
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,730
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  914
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    24
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,668
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,299
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,318
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,350
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        5
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    463
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         308
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.90
<LOANS-NON>                                        432
<LOANS-PAST>                                       716
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   364
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    615
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,014
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       82
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  937
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               300
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            637
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9105-3]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notification of Public Advisory Committee Teleconference.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) will hold a public teleconference on February 4, 2010 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.                               ( print page 3731)                            The meeting is open to the public. For further information regarding the teleconference and background materials, please contact Dolores Wesson at the number listed below.                    

*Background:*                         GNEB is a Federal advisory committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463. GNEB provides advice and recommendations to the President and Congress on environmental and infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with Mexico.                         *Purpose of Meeting:*                         The purpose of this teleconference is to discuss and approve the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's Thirteenth Report.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

If you wish to make oral comments or submit written comments to the Board, please contact Dolores Wesson at least five days prior to the meeting.

*General Information:*                     Additional information concerning the GNEB can be found on its Web site at                     *http://www.epa.gov/​ocem/​gneb.*

*Meeting Access:*                     For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Dolores Wesson at (202) 564-1351 or e-mail at                     *wesson.dolores@epa.gov.*                     To request accommodation of a disability, please contact Dolores Wesson at least 10 days prior to the meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.                

Dated: January 12, 2010.

Dolores Wesson,

Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-1186 Filed 1-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 28, 2020

No. 04-18-00917-CV

Ziaunnisa K. LODHI,

Appellant

v.

Shah A. HAQUE,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI04290

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The court has considered the appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration, and the 

motion is hereby DENIED. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              44
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            8115
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        628
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          27706
<ALLOWANCE>                                        200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   37306
<DEPOSITS>                                       21564
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1110
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       14622
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   37306
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   2442
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   27
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   304
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  2773
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1064
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1064
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             1709
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       24
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    742
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         742
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.94
<LOANS-NON>                                        231
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   176
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  200
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               200
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>