alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          25,337
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             104
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                23,232
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    170,378
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,162
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            34,285
<LOANS>                                        394,427
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 674,100
<DEPOSITS>                                     562,955
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,081
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,632
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,800
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 674,100
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,051
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,574
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   289
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,914
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,586
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,328
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      260
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (24)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,167
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,379
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,379
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.14
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,388
<LOANS-PAST>                                       520
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   353
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,015
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      466
<RECOVERIES>                                        65
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,874
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               260
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
463 A.2d 30

#### Commonwealth v. Heiney, Appellant.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied Nov. 9, 1983.

Submitted January 7, 1983.

George Howard Eager, for appellant; Edward F. Browne, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, BECK and JOHNSON, JJ.

Affirmed.

SPAETH, J., filed a memorandum concurring opinion.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-4179

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus
JOSEPH ARDELL WHALEY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-22)
Submitted: September 15, 1998 Decided: October 7, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dean R. Davis, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Jane J. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The Government’s argument that Whaley’s notice of appeal was untimely filed is without merit. Because the last day of the appeal period fell on a Sunday, Whaley’s notice of appeal was properly filed the next day. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a). 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Ardell Whaley pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracyto possess with intent to distribute and to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994). Whaley was subsequently sentenced to 46 months’ imprisonment and an ensuing fiveyear term of supervised release. In his plea agreement, Whaley agreed to waive his right to appeal whatever sentence the district court imposed including any issues that relate to the establishment of the Guideline range. On appeal, Whaley alleges that his sentencewas unjustifiably harsh compared to the probationary sentence received by his co-defendant who allegedly had a greater involvement in the drug conspiracy. He maintains that this disproportionate sentence is due primarily to the Government’s failure to provide him an adequate opportunity to furnish substantial assistance so that he, like his co-defendant, could have also received a downward departure. He was, however, interviewed by a government agent and had the opportunity to provide information. We dismiss Whaley’s appeal. * During the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, the court questioned Whaley about the waiver provision contained in the plea agreement, and Whaley stated that he understood the provision. A defendant may3 waive his statutory right to appeal his sentence if the waiver is knowing and voluntary. See United States v. Marin, 961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir. 1992). For a waiver to be knowing and voluntary, the district court should specifically question the defendant about the waiver provision before accepting his plea. Whether the waiver is effective is a legal question reviewed de novo. See id. Based on Whaley’s statements at the plea colloquy, we find that the waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily.We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Franklin Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Daniel T. Voelpel, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Daniel T. Voelpel
--------------------------------------------
Daniel T. Voelpel
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beverly National Corporation the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donat
A. Fournier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Donat A. Fournier
---------------------------
    Donat A. Fournier
    Chief Executive Officer

August 9, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                              BOWATER INCORPORATED
                        EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE GRANTOR TRUST


         WHEREAS, Bowater Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), established the Amended and Restated Bowater Incorporated
Executive Severance Grantor Trust (the "Trust"); and

         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Trust, to change a part
of the definition of "Change in Control" thereunder;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust is hereby amended, effective February 26,
1999, as follows:

Section 1.2(h)(d) is amended to read:

         "(d)     the date on which less than 50% of the total membership of the
                  Board consists of Continuing Directors."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bowater Incorporated has caused this First
Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 4th day of August,
1999.

                                   BOWATER INCORPORATED



                                   By:  /s/ Anthony H. Barash
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            Anthony H. Barash

                                   Title: Sr. Vice President, Corporate Affairs
                                          and General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27557-27558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11707]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Federal Advisory Committee Act

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463), the purpose of this notice is to announce that the Federal 
Communications Commission (FCC) has renewed the charter for the 
Advisory Committee for the 2012 Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-12 
Advisory Committee), for a two-year period. The WRC-12 Advisory 
Committee is a Federal advisory committee under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act.

DATES: Renewed through May 14, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Room TW-C305, Washington, DC 20554.

[[Page 27558]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexander Roytblat, Designated Federal 
Official, WRC-12 Advisory Committee, FCC International Bureau, 
Strategic Analysis and Negotiations Division, at (202) 418-7501. E-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0a18c8598818e848592ceb28f9994828c8194a0868383ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d6c4148554c4349485f037f4254594f414c596d4b4e4e034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The GSA has renewed the charter of the WRC-
12 Advisory Committee through May 14, 2012. The WRC-12 Advisory 
Committee will continue to provide to the FCC advice, technical 
support, and recommended proposals relating to the preparation of 
United States proposals and positions for the 2012 World 
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-12); and, its scope of activities is 
to address issues contained in the agenda for WRC-12. In accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, 
this notice advises interested persons of the renewal of the WRC-12 
Advisory Committee.

Federal Communications Commission.
Mindel De La Torre,
Chief, International Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010-11707 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Unassociated Document


    
      


       

      EXHIBIT
10.1

       

    

     

    COMPENSATION
AGREEMENT

    


    This Compensation Agreement is dated as
of March 31, 2009 between Clear Skies Solar, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and Harvey Kesner (the “Consultant”).

    


    WHEREAS, the Company has requested the
Consultant to provide the Company with certain SEC related legal services in
connection with their business (the “’34 Act Work”) on a fixed fee basis, and
the Consultant has agreed to provide the Company with the ’34 Act Work;
and

    


    WHEREAS, the Company wishes to
compensate the Consultant with shares of its common stock for such services
rendered in satisfaction of the monthly fixed fee;

    


    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants hereinafter stated, it is agreed as follows:

    


    1.           The
Company shall issue to the Consultant, as consideration for the ’34 Act Work,
$8,000 worth of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, each
month for the twelve month period beginning on April 1, 2009.  The
177,778 shares issued to the Consultant for April and May (the “Issued Shares”)
were based on a value of $0.09 per share.  The remaining shares to be
issued shall be valued at the ten (10) day trading average closing price prior
to the first of each month and shall be delivered within ten (10) business days
following the first of each month.

    


    2.           The
Company shall register 1,177,778 shares of its common stock on a Form S-8 to
cover the 177,778 Issued Shares as well as an additional 1,000,000 shares to
cover additional issuances under this Compensation Agreement.  The
registration statement shall be filed promptly following the filing of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008, but in no event later than 15 days after such filing.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Compensation Agreement has been executed by the parties as
of the date first above written.

     

     

    
      
        	 	 	 	CONSULTANT	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                 

              	 	 	
                /s/
      Harvey Kesner

              	 
	
                 

              	 	 	
                Harvey
      Kesner

              	 
	
                 

              	 	 	
                 

              	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	The
      Company:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	CLEAR
      SKIES SOLAR, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	

                /s/
      Ezra Green

              	 
	 	 	 	
                Ezra
      Green

                Chief Executive officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2406 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 587
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2406

   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent 
    authority for entry into the United States of certain religious 
                                workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 12, 2000

   Mr. Abraham (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. DeWine, and Mr. Leahy) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                              June 8, 2000

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent 
    authority for entry into the United States of certain religious 
                                workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mother Teresa Religious Workers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR ENTRY INTO UNITED STATES OF CERTAIN 
              RELIGIOUS WORKERS.

    Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking ``before October 1, 
2000,'' each place it appears.

                                                       Calendar No. 587

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2406

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent 
    authority for entry into the United States of certain religious 
                                workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 8, 2000

                       Reported without amendment
```
NO. 07-04-0025-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MARCH 4, 2004

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF C.S.L., A CHILD

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 100TH DISTRICT COURT OF CARSON COUNTY;

	NO. 9231; HONORABLE DAVID MCCOY, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	On January 21, 2004, the clerk of this court received a copy of a Notice of Appeal  filed on behalf of appellant Carol Osmond.  By letter dated January 26, 2004, the clerk advised appellant that a filing fee had not been received, see Tex. R. App. P. 5, nor had a docketing statement been filed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1.  The clerk’s letter likewise advised that no further action would be taken on the appeal by this Court until a filing fee had been paid and that failure to pay the filing fee may result in dismissal of the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. 

	The filing fee was not paid.  By letter dated February 12, 2004, the clerk advised counsel for appellant that the filing fee had still not been paid, and that unless the filing fee was received on or before February 23, 2004, the appeal would be subject to dismissal. 

 	The filing fee has not been paid.  Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

							Phil Johnson

							Chief Justice
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
of Metropolitan Health Networks, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael M. Earley, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ MICHAEL M. EARLEY
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Catacosinos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ William J. Catacosinos
|William J. Catacosinos    
|Chief Executive Officer   
|November 3, 2004
Exhibit 10.5


 


ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE
BENEFIT SCHEDULE


Adopted: May 19,
2009


 


On
February 23, 2009, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) made and adopted an amended and restated Change of Control
Severance Benefit Schedule (the “Schedule”)
pursuant to the Company’s Severance Benefit Plan.  On May 19, 2009, the Board adopted this
Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule (this “Amendment”).  This Amendment may be altered, amended or
cancelled at any time in the sole discretion of the Company.  This
Amendment amends the Schedule to the extent set forth below.  Except as specifically amended by this
Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Schedule shall remain unchanged and
in full force and effect.


 


Effective
as of May 19, 2009, the section of the Schedule entitled “Acceleration of
Vesting” is amended and restated in its entirety to read as set forth below:


 


“Acceleration of Vesting: Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained in the Eligible Employee’s stock option or
other stock award agreements or the Company’s equity incentive plans, in the
event the surviving or acquiring corporation in any Change in Control assumes
the Eligible Employee’s stock options and/or other stock awards, as applicable,
or substitutes similar stock options or stock awards for the Eligible Employee’s
stock options and/or other stock awards, as applicable, in accordance with the
terms of the Company’s equity incentive plans, then the vesting of all of the
Eligible Employee’s stock options and/or other stock awards (or any substitute
stock options or stock awards), as applicable, shall be accelerated in full.”