alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLAN
                       FOR DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES OF BOWATER
                      INCORPORATED AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES
                             AS AMENDED AND RESTATED
                           EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 26, 1999


         WHEREAS, Bowater Incorporated (the "Company") previously amended and
restated the Supplemental Benefit Plan For Designated Employees of Bowater
Incorporated and Affiliated Companies as of February 26, 1999 (the "Plan");

         WHEREAS, Section 7.02 of the Plan permits the Human Resources and
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "HRCC") to
amend the Plan;

         WHEREAS, the HRCC desires to amend the Plan to allow the Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation or any other successor
officer who has similar responsibilities, to modify or waive the provisions of
Section 6.02;

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, effective November 9, 1999, the
first line of Section 6.02(b) shall be modified as follows:

                  "shall not, without the written consent of the Committee or
         the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer or any other
         successor officer who performs equivalent functions, or his or her
         delegate (provided, however, that in no event, shall any such officer
         or delegate give such written consent to him or herself or to the
         person who delegated such authority to him or her or to a person who
         reports directly to such person), compete directly or indirectly . . ."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the HRCC has caused this First Amendment to the
Plan to be executed by a duly authorized officer this 9th day of May, 2000.

                                        BOWATER INCORPORATED


                                        By:      /s/ James T. Wright
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                 James T. Wright
                                        Title:  Vice President - Human Resources
                                               ---------------------------------


                                      -1-
EXHIBIT
21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

THE MAJOR
AUTOMOTIVE COMPANIES, INC.

Major Acquisition Corp.Major Automotive Group, Inc.
Major Chevrolet,
Inc.
Major Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Long Island City,
Inc.
Major Kia, Inc.

Major Automotive of New
Jersey, Inc.Compass Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
Compass
Dodge, Inc.

Major Orange Properties, LLC

Major
Automotive Realty Corp.

Hempstead Mazda, Inc.

Major
Nissan, Inc.

Mid-Atlantic Telecommunications, Inc.

Major Fleet & Leasing Co.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


               CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                          OF TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE


         I, Paul L. Berns, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Bone
Care International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 (the "Form
10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                             /S/ PAUL L. BERNS
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Paul L. Berns
                                             September 26, 2003



















                                       59
EXHIBIT 32.0



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the report of Beverly National
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter-ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donat A. Fournier, Chief Executive Officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                            
|--- |  | ---------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Donat A. Fournier      
|    |  | Donat A. Fournier          
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and
|    |  | principal financial officer
|    | 
|    |  | May 13, 2005               



The foregoing certificate is furnished
solely for purposes of complying with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any of the Companys previous filings under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the Companys future filings, including this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference
into any such filings.
Exhibit 23.1

                    Consent of Richard A. Eisner & Co., LLP


<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-84961) and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-89789)
of our report dated March 1, 2000, with respect to Note 10, March 17, 2000 on
the financial statements of NUWAVE Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of NUWAVE Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 1999.



Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP


Florham Park, New Jersey
March 29, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         HALL, KINION & ASSOCIATES, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

HALL KINION AND ASSOCIATES, UK LIMITED, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Registrant organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.

GROUP-IPEX, INC., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, organized under
the laws of the State of California.

TKO, Personnel, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, organized
under the laws of the State of California.

Hall Kinion International, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant,
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

OnStaff Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Registrant, organized under the laws of the State of California.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer
of JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (Registrant), hereby
certifies that the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: March 15, 2004



| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ JACK FRIEDMAN                   
| |                                     
| | JACK FRIEDMAN                       
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

80
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHELDON ANTHONY GOODRIDGE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 192 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2377 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2377

     To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium petroleum sulfonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2000

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium petroleum sulfonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.34.01    Sodium petroleum  Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     sulfonate (CAS                                                          31/04            ''
                     No. 68608-26-4)                                                                           .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     3402.11.50)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KA for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sami S. Abbasi, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                 |  |  |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/  Sami S. Abbasi                                                              |  |  |  | 
|Sami S. Abbasi                                                                   |  |  |  | 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Dated: March 16, 2004



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2205 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2205

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclooctene (COE).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2000

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclooctene (COE).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLOOCTENE (COE).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.28.11    Cyclooctene       Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     (COE) (provided                                                         31/2003          ''
                     for in                                                                                    .
                     subheading
                     2902.90.80)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                               ALLTEL CORPORATION

                      1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES

         WHEREAS, the ALLTEL Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan for Employees
(the "Plan") provides that it may be amended by the Board of Directors of ALLTEL
Corporation; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of ALLTEL Corporation has determined
that an amendment to the Plan is advisable;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan hereby is amended, effective as of October 26,
2000, as follows:

         1.  Section 6 of the Plan hereby is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:

                  6.  TRANSFERABILITY

                  Except as provided in this Section 6, no option granted under
         this Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise
         alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent
         and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order,
         as defined by the Code, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income
         Security Act, or the rules thereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
         and subject to such conditions as the Committee may prescribe from time
         to time, the Committee may permit, during the lifetime of the holder of
         an option which is not an incentive stock option (as defined pursuant
         to Section 422 of the Code), the transfer or assignment of the option.
         The designation of a beneficiary with respect to an option shall not
         constitute a transfer for purposes of this Section 6."
#### ROBERTSON et al., Appellants, *v.*LONGLEY et al., Respondents.

(No. 1,564.)

(Submitted May 2, 1903.

Decided May 4, 1903.)

*Appeal*— Sufficiency *of Evidence*— Bevieiu—Bill *of Exceptions —Specification of Particulars*— Complete *Record.*

Í. under Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1152, providing that, when an exception to a verdict or decision is on account of tbe insufficiency of tbe evidence, tbe objection must specify tbe particulars in wbicb tbe evidence is alleged to be insufficient, a bill of exceptions containing no specifications whatever, nor pointing out in any manner any insufficiency, will not warrant a review of tbe evidence.

2. where it is not apparent from any recital in the record that it contains all tbe evidence, or tbe substance thereof, and there is no statement in the certificate of tbe Judge from wbicb it may be inferred that the bill contains all the evidence in substance, its sufficiency cannot be reviewed.

*Appeal from District Court, Parle County; Frank Henry, Judge.*

Action by Brant C. Robertson and others against T. W-. Longley and another. Judgment for defendants', and plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

*Mr. T. J. Porter,*and *Mr. A. P.*Stark, for Appellants'.

MR. GHIE'F JUSTICE! BRANlTLY

delivered the-opinion of the court.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, as stockholders of the Enterprise Mining & Smelting Cbmpany, a corporation, to "obtain a decree declaring the defendants! trustees of the title to the New: Enterprise and Blue Mountain quartz lode mining claims for the benefit of the corporation, and requiring them to make conveyances of the property to it. From a judgment in favor of the defendants', plaintiffs have appealed.

*129There was no motion for a newi trial in the court below, and the only question argued in the brief of appellants is the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain, the findings. TJpon examination of the transcript, we find that we cannot consider this question for two reasons:

1. Section 1152 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that, “when the exception is to the verdict or decision, upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to 'justify it, the objection must specify the particulars in which such evidence' is alleged to- be insufficient.” The bill of exceptions found in the record contains no specifications whatever, nor any attempt in any manner to- point out any alleged insufficiency of the evidence. It must, therefore, be disregarded.

2. It is not apparent from any recital in the record that it contains all the evidence, or the substance thereof, heard by the court below at the trial; nor is there any statement in the certificate of the judge from which- the inference is permissible that the bill contains all the evidence in substance-. The record, therefore, does not present the question which appellant® desire to have reviewed. *(State*v. *Shepphard,*23 Mont. 323, 58 Pac. 868; *T. C. Power & Bro.*v. *Stocking et al.,*26 Mont. 478, 68 Pac. 857; *King*v. *Pony Gold Mining Co. et al.,*28 Mont. 74, 72 Pac. 309.) The judgment is therefore, affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: May 10, 2010. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10232
1st Pacific Bank of California
San Diego
CA
5/07/201010233
Access Bank
Champlin
MN
5/07/201010234
The Bank of Bonifay
Bonifay
FL
5/07/201010235
Towne Bank of Arizona
Mesa
AZ
5/07/2010


[FR Doc. 2010-11678 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### N. M. NELSON, Appellant, v. MIDDLEWEST GRAIN COMPANY, a Corporation, and H. T. Hogy, Respondents.

(173 N. W. 475.)

This case is governed by the decision in Kluver v. Middlewest Grain Co. ante, 210.

Opinion filed June 21, 1919.

’ Prom an order of the District Court of Ward County, *Leighton,*J., plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*W. H. Sibbald,*for appellant.

*FisTce ■& Murphy,*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

This case was submitted together with Kluver v. Middlewest Grain Co. ante, 210, 173 N. W. 468. The facts in the instant case are identical with those in the Kluver Case, and on the authority of the decision rendered in that case, the order appealed from is affirmed.

Grace, J., concurs in the result.
##### 



Exhibit 10.103
  
    12.0 Hazardous Substance and Environmental Law Requirements
   12.1.1
    
    [**]     [**]     [**]     [**]     [**]12.1.2
    
    [**]     [**]
 
 [**]
    
    Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to
the omitted portions.
  1




---



##### 




    
    [**]
 Accepted and Agreed
To: 
International Business Machines Corporation
    
    Accepted and Agreed
To:
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.By:
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Authorized Signature
    
    Date
    
    Authorized Signature
    
    DateType or Print Name
    
    Type or Print NameTitle & Organization
    
    Title & Organization
 
   2