alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Committee.                    

*Date:*                         June 17, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Allerton Hotel, 701 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michelle M. Timmerman, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 2217, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-4573,                         *timmermanm@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 6, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-11323 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, I, the undersigned
Chief  Executive Officer of American Ecology Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify,  based  on  my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for  the  period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934  and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Stephen A. Romano
---------------------
Stephen A. Romano
August 3, 2004


                                       34
<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12107 and #12108]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-1897-DR), dated 04/02/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/12/2010 Through 04/15/2010.                    

*Effective Date:*                         05/07/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/01/2010.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/03/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of New Jersey, dated 04/02/2010 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: 

*Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Burlington, Cumberland, Ocean.                

All other counties contiguous to the above named primary counties have previously been declared.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-11751 Filed 5-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
FILED IN5th COURT OF APPEALS        DALLAS, TEXAS8/28/2015 10:50:34 AM            LISA MATZ                Clerk

- NOTICE
- RTA
- JMT
- MNT
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2299 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2299

    To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to continue State 
 Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (DSH) allotments for fiscal 
             year 2001 at the levels for fiscal year 2000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2000

   Mr. L. Chafee (for himself, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Helms, Mr. Mack, Mrs. 
Feinstein, Mrs. Hutchison, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Grams, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. 
Levin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                      to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to continue State 
 Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (DSH) allotments for fiscal 
             year 2001 at the levels for fiscal year 2000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicaid DSH Preservation Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF MEDICAID DSH ALLOTMENTS AT FY FISCAL YEAR 2000 
              LEVELS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001.

    Section 1923(f) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-4(f)), 
as amended by section 601 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced 
Budget Refinement Act of 1999, as enacted into law by section 
1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106-113 (113 Stat. 1501A-394), is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``2002'' and 
                inserting ``2001'';
                    (B) in the matter preceding the table--
                            (i) by striking ``2002'' and inserting 
                        ``2001''; and
                            (ii) by inserting ``(and the DSH allotment 
                        for a State for fiscal year 2001 is the same as 
                        the DSH allotment for the State for fiscal year 
                        2000 as determined under the following table)'' 
                        before the semicolon; and
                    (C) in the table in such paragraph, by striking the 
                columns labeled ``FY 01'' and ``FY 02'' relating to 
                fiscal years 2001 and 2002; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``2003'' and 
                inserting ``2002''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``2003'' and 
                inserting ``2002''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2234 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2234

  To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2000

  Mr. Warner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate certain facilities of the United States Postal Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOEL T. BROYHILL POSTAL BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8409 Lee Highway in Merrifield, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Joel T. Broyhill Postal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joel T. 
Broyhill Postal Building''.

SEC. 2. JOSEPH L. FISHER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3118 Washington Boulevard in Arlington, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Joseph L. Fisher Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph L. 
Fisher Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6996]

In the Matter of the Designation of Eric Breininger, Also Known 
as Abdul-Gaffar, Also Known as Abdulgaffar el Almani, as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Eric Breininger, 
and also known as Abdul-Gaffar, also known as Abdulgaffar el Almani, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 6, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-11203 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theodore A. Babcock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Theodore A. Babcock
|Theodore A. Babcock    
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 3, 2004
#### Harry R. Burgess, Appellant, v. Otis Dockstader, Respondent.

Judgment Unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Smith, P. J., not sitting.
| 1. | Such      Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010,      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      LATTENO FOOD CORP. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:      August 16, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Spence Walker       |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   | Spence      Walker           |   |
|                              |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
September 30, 1996 financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements. EPS amounts have
been restated to reflect the Company's adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" as of December 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          51,912
<SECURITIES>                                     3,956
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,563
<PP&E>                                         709,494
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 913,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,689
<BONDS>                                        387,299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,516
<COMMON>                                           363
<OTHER-SE>                                     311,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   913,110
<SALES>                                         93,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,731
<CGS>                                           28,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,036
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,039
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,596
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,196)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
        
    


</TABLE>
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-4588



# 
W ELDON B ERNARD S INCLAIR ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.

James C. Fox, Senior District Judge.

(CR-01-2FO) Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 26, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M.Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION PER CURIAM: Weldon Bernard Sinclair appeals his conviction and sentence on the ground that at the time of sentencing, the district court should have revisited the issue of his competence to plead guilty. In support of his claim, he presented the medical report of a neuro-psychologist who opined that Sinclair suffers from significant deficits in cognitive ability and information processing. However, the psychologist also opined that Sinclair was competent to plead when he did so and wascompetent to proceed with the resolution of his case, so long as special care was taken to make sure he understood. **1** Because there were no abnormalities in Sinclair’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 plea colloquy such that the district court should have questioned Sinclair further as to his mental competency, and given the opinions in the expert’s report as to Sinclair’s competency, we find no error bythe district court in failing to revisit the issue of Sinclair’s competency at sentencing. **2** Accordingly, we affirm Sinclair’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

**1** We note that both the district court and counsel took special care to fully explain to Sinclair the proceedings against him and the effect of his plea on his rights.
**2** Sinclair’s reliance upon United States v. Damon , 191 F.3d 561 (4th Cir. 1999), is misplaced. In Damon , we remanded for further inquiry into Damon’s competence because he, unlike Sinclair, testified at his plea colloquy that he was under the influence of anti-depressant medication, which in some circumstances is known to impair judgment. Here therewere no circumstances present which required the district court to conduct a more searching inquiry into Sinclair’s competence. 2 U NITED S TATES v. S INCLAIR
#### Pribble v. Bromley *et al.*

Where, on appeal, it was alleged that the com t erred in finding that a settlement had been consummated prior to the delivery of a note sued on, but the particulars wherein the evidence was deemed insufficient to sustain such finding were not pointed out, it will be presumed that the decision was justified.

(Opinion filed January 25, 1905.)

*91Appeal from circuit court, Spink county; Hori. Charles S. Whiting, Judge.

Action, by William W. Pribble against N. P. Bromley and another. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

*N. P. Bromley,*for appellants.

*William Issenlmth,*for respondent.

Fuller, J.

On this appeal from a judgment and order overruling a motion for a new trial in an action on a promissory note, the only points embraced in the assignments of error that are touched upon in the argument of counsel for appellants are to the effect that the court erred in finding that a settlement and mutual satisfaction of all matters of difference set forth in certain counterclaims had been consummated prior to the execution and delivery of such note; but as our attention is called to no particulars wherein the evidence is deemed insufficient to sustain any of the findings of fact, the presumption that the decision is fuller justified must prevail. Nor is there any merit in the contention that a settlement was not alleged, and that the court failed to rule upon appellants’ exceptions to certain depositions which were properly read in evidence.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000865 06-JAN-2014 08:04 AM