alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2150 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2150

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain other single 
                         yarn of viscose rayon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

 Mr. Hollings (for himself and Mr. Thurmond) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain other single 
                         yarn of viscose rayon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
    

``             9902.xx.xx     Other yarn,        Free        No change        No change       On or before
                               single: Of                                                      12/31/2004
                               viscose rayon,
                               untwisted or
                               with a twist not
                               exceeding 120
                               turns/m-
                               Monofilament;
                               multifilament,
                               untwisted or
                               with twist of
                               less than 5
                               turns per meter
                               (provided for in
                               subheading
                               5403.31.00.20)..
 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to goods entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 
15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                               <all>D23/
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth J. Saunders, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
except for the failure to (i) timely file the Annual Report on Form 10-K, (ii) complete and timely file in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at March 31, 2005 and (iii) timely file the associated report of Peregrine Systems, Inc.'s
independent registered public accounting firm, the Annual Report of Peregrine Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Systems, Inc.

Date:
June 30, 2005

| |  |  | /s/KENNETH J. SAUNDERSKenneth J. Saunders
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
| |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Peregrine Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1937 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1937

To amend the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation 
    Act to provide for sales of electricity by the Bonneville Power 
              Administration to joint operating entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 1999

   Mr. Craig introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation 
    Act to provide for sales of electricity by the Bonneville Power 
              Administration to joint operating entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. Section 5(b) of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power 
Planning and Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 839c(b)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
            ``(7) Required sale.--
                    ``(A) Definition of a joint operating entity.--In 
                this section, the term `joint operating entity' means 
                an entity that is lawfully organized under State law as 
                a public body or cooperative prior to the date of 
                enactment of this paragraph, and is formed by and whose 
                members or participants are two or more public bodies 
                or cooperatives, each of which was a customer of the 
                Bonneville Power Administration on or before January 1, 
                1999.
                    ``(B) Sale.--Pursuant to paragraph (1), the 
                Administrator shall sell, at wholesale to a joint 
                operating entity, electric power solely for the purpose 
                of meeting the regional firm power consumer loads of 
                regional public bodies and cooperatives that are 
                members of or participants in the joint operating 
                entity.
                    ``(C) No resale.--A public body or cooperative to 
                which a joint operating entity sells electric power 
                under subparagraph (B) shall not resell that power 
                except to retail customers of the public body or 
                cooperative or to another regional member or 
                participant of the same joint operating entity, or 
                except as otherwise permitted by law.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Bowater Incorporated (the Company),
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. May 9, 2005
    
    /s/ William G. HarveyName: William G. Harvey
Title: Chief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11167]



[[Page 26198]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 47-2009]


Foreign-Trade Zone 121 - Albany, New York, Application for 
Expansion and Reorganization Under Alternative Site Framework, 
Amendment of Application

    A request has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 
Board) by the Capital District Regional Planning Commission (CDRPC), 
grantee of FTZ 121, to amend its application to expand and reorganize 
FTZ 121 under the alternative site framework (ASF) adopted by the Board 
(74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09).
    CDRPC is now requesting to modify its application to combine 
previously proposed Sites 5 and 6 (with an expansion of the cumulative 
acreage by 163 acres) as follows: proposed Site 5, 1694 acres, Luther 
Forest-STEP, 10 Hermes Road, Malta, NY. The applicant proposes that 
Site 5 be subject to a seven-year ``sunset'' time limit, instead of the 
standard five-year ``sunset'' time limit that would otherwise apply to 
magnet sites under the ASF.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
(original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive 
Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is 
June 10, 2010. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted 
during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-
day period (to June 25, 2010).
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 2111, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
Board's website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further 
information, contact Maureen Hinman at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfd2decacddadad191d7d6d1d2ded1ffcbcddedbda91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1974786c6b7c7c7737717077747877596d6b787d7c377e766f">[email protected]</span></a> or 
(202) 482-0627.

    Dated: May 5, 2010.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11167 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12040 and <greek-i>12041]


VIRGINIA Disaster Number VA-00028

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of 
VIRGINIA (FEMA-1874-DR), dated 02/16/2010.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm and Snowstorm.
    Incident Period: 12/18/2009 through 12/20/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/04/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/19/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/16/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of 
VIRGINIA, dated 02/16/2010, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Covington City, Galax City, Radford City

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-11197 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2120 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2120

    To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to 
establish teacher recruitment and professional development programs for 
                  rural areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2000

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to 
establish teacher recruitment and professional development programs for 
                  rural areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RURAL TEACHER PROGRAMS.

    Part A of title II of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 6621 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``SEC. 2104. RURAL TEACHERS.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may award grants on a competitive 
basis to rural eligible local educational agencies to carry out 
activities described in subsection (b).
    ``(b) Use of Funds.--A rural eligible local educational agency that 
receives a grant under this section may use the funds made available 
through the grant to develop incentive programs--
            ``(1) to recruit and retain qualified teachers; and
            ``(2) to provide high-quality professional development to 
        teachers.
    ``(c) Application.--To be eligible to receive a grant under this 
section, a rural eligible local educational agency shall submit an 
application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and 
containing such information as the Secretary may reasonably require.
    ``(d) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Metropolitan statistical area.--The term 
        `metropolitan statistical area' has the meaning given such term 
        by the Bureau of the Census.
            ``(2) Rural eligible local educational agency.--The term 
        `rural eligible local educational agency' means a local 
        educational agency--
                    ``(A) that is not located in a metropolitan 
                statistical area; and
                    ``(B) in which there is a high percentage (as 
                determined by the Secretary) of individuals from 
                families with incomes below the poverty line (as 
                defined by the Office of Management and Budget, and 
                revised annually in accordance with section 673(2) of 
                the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 
                9902(2))) applicable to a family of the size 
                involved.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### SNELL, Plaintiff, *v.*WELCH et al., Defendants.

(No. 1,941.)

(Submitted April 23, 1903.

Decided April 24, 1903.)

*Supreme Court*— Original *Jurisdiction*— Propriety *of Exercise —Injunction—Constitutionality of School Text-Book Laiv.*

The supreme court will not entertain an original proceeding to test, by an injunction to restrain the state text-boob commission from advertising for bids, the constitutionality of a statute relating to a uniform system of text-boobs, and requiring the boobs contracted for to bear “union labelsno pressing necessity appearing for a speedy determination of the question, the court calendar being three years in arrears, and the matter being one which should ordinarily, and in the first instance, be submitted' to the district court; especially where it is apparent that the interests of the public, so far as they are involved, may be as well protected if the parties are left to pursue the usual course.

ORIGINAL suit by Charles H. Snell against W. W. Welch, state superintendent of public instruction, and others, constituting the state text-book commission.

Dismissed.

*Mr. Edward Horsley, Mr. Robert B. Smith,*and *Mr. E. A. Carleton,*for Plaintiff.

*Mr. James Donovan, Attorney General,*for Defendants.

MR. CHIEE JUSTICE BRANTLY

delivered the opinion of the court

This action was brought by complaint filed in this court to obtain an- injunction to> restrain the defendant W. W. Welch, superintendent of public instruction of the state, and the said Welch and the other defendants as the state text-book commission, created by an Act of the Eighth Legislative Assémbly known as “Senate Bill 54” (Chapter CXXII, Laws of 1903), from proceeding to advertise for bids for contracts to supply a uniform system of text-books for use in the public schools of the state, as authorized and required by the provisions of the said *38Act. The court, upon application, permitted the complaint to be filed, reseawing for consideration the question whether the circumstances were such as required it toi assume jurisdiction of the cause in the first instance.

The action involves the constitutionality of a provision in Section 13 of the Act requiring all books contracted for by the commission to bear “union labels,” — that is, to be published by firms entitled to use and using the label of the printers’ union. After consideration, the court concludes that no urgent necessity is shown to exist why it should entertain the action in the first instance. The calendar of this court is much in arrears. In the absence of some pressing necessity, we do not think we should postpone other causes which have been awaiting decision —some of them for as much as three years — in order to permit parties to reach a speedy decision upon a matter which should ordinarily, and in the first instance, be submitted to the district court. This is especially true of cases like the present, when it is apparent that the interests'of the public^ so far as they are involved, may be protected as well if the parties are left to pursue the usual course.

The action is therefore dismissed.

*Dismissed.*
|    |                                                                                                                     |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   | Date: | May 10, 2016 | /s/ Bruce E. Kiddoo |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   | Bruce E. Kiddoo |   |
|   |   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, William J. Catacosinos, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TNP Enterprises, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and as presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and; 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 5,2004
(February 14, 1899.)

#### DAY v. GRIDLEY.

[56 Pac. 77.]

Practice — Appeal—Damages—Laches.—A party taking an appeal and failing to furnish a record of the case within the time prescribed by law and the rules of court, is manifestly for delay and subjects the party to damages.

APPEAL from District Court, Cassia County.

No appearance for appellant.

Guy C. Bamum, for Respondent.

No brief filed.

Per CURIAM.

— Judgment was entered on September 39, 1898. Appeal was perfected by filing and serving notice of appeal, and filing undertaking .on September 29, 1898. It appears by the certificate of the clerk of the district court that no transcript has ever been ordered, and no other steps taken to bring the case to this court by the appellant. Thereupon, upon motion of counsel for respondents, it is ordered that said cause be docketed and dismissed, and that the respondents have their costs; and it is further ordered that the respondents have damages to the amount of twelve per cent on said judgment, it manifestly appearing that the appeal in said cause was taken merely for delay, in accordance with section 4825 of the Revised Statutes, and rule 9 of this court (32 Pac. viii).