T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

* * T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n r e : AMR MOHS E N, D ebt or, AMR MOHS E N, A p p e lla n t, v. C A R O L W U , C hapt er7 T rust ee , A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 60013 B A P N o. 09- 1159 ME MOR AN DU M *

A p p e a l f r o m th e N in th C ir c u it B ankrup t cyA pp el l at e P anel H ol l ow e l l , K i r s c he r , a nd S a l t z m a n, B a nkrupt c y Judge s , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y 14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an d M U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED MA Y22 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 60013 2 A m r M oh se n app ea l s pro se fr om the B ankrup t cyA pp el l at e P anel ’ s ( “ B A P ”) j ud gm entaf

fi rm i ng the bank rupt cycourt ’ s order s denyi ng M oh se n’ s m ot i on t o set a s i de the de f

aul tj udgm e nta ga i ns tc orpor a t e e nt i ty de f e nda nt s a nd hi s m ot i on f or r e c ons i de r a t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 158( d) . W e r e vi e w de no vo B A P deci si on s, and app l y the sa m e s t andard of revi ew thatthe B A P appl i ed to th e b a n k ru p tc y c o u rt’s ru lin g . B oy aj i an v . N e w Fal l s C or p. ( I n r e B oy aj i an) , 564 F . 3d 1088, 1090 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . W e r e vi e w f ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on a d e n ia l o f am o tio n f

o rr e c o n s id e r a tio n , Fi rst A ve. W . B ld g . L L Cv. Ja m es (In re O n e c a s t Me d ia , I

n c .) , 439 F . 3d 558, 561 ( 9th C i r . 2006) , a nd ade ni a l of am ot i on to s e t a s id e d e f

au lt ju d g m e n t, J

e f f D . v . Ke m

pthorne , 36 5 F . 3d 84 4, 85 0 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f

f irm . T h e b an k ru p tcy c o u rt d idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n in d en yin g M o h se n ’s m ot i ons be c aus e M ohs e n i s nota n a tt orne y a nd the r e f or e c a nnotr e pr e s e ntthe n a m e d c o rp o r a te e n titie s . See D -B eam L td. P ’s hi p v. R ol lerD er by Skat es , Inc. , 366 F . 3d 972, 973- 74 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( “ I ti s al ongs t a ndi ng rul e tha tc orpor a t i ons a n d o th e ru n in c o rp o r a te d a s s o c ia tio n s m u s t ap p e a rin c o u rt th r o u g h a n a tto rn e y .” ( a lte r a tio n , c ita tio n , a n d in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) ) . M o reo v er, M o h sen l ack s st an d i n g t o d efen d ag ai n stth e co m p l ai n tas a s h a r e h o ld e ro ra s a n a lte re g o o f th e n a m e d c o rp o r a te e n titie s . See M on ey m akerv.11- 60013 3 C obe n ( I n r e E is e n) , 3 1 F .3 d 1 4 4 7 , 1 4 5 1 n .2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ) ( “[ T ]h e d e b to r ’s a s s e ts a nd c l a i m s pa s s t o the trus t e e , m a ki ng the trus t e e the pr ope rpa rty i n i nt e r e s ta nd the onl y pa rty w i th s t a ndi ng t o appe a l the ba nkrupt c y c ourt ’ s or de r . ” ( c i t a t i on a nd i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed)) ; C om m un ist P art y v . 52 2 V

al enci a, Inc. , 4 1 C a l. R p tr . 2 d 6 1 8 , 6 2 6 ( C t . Ap p . 1 9 9 5 ) ( a l t e re g o l i ab i l i ty “ i s n o tad o c tr i n e th a ta l l o ws the pers on s w ho ac tual l y c on trol the corporat i on t o d i sr egar d the corporat e f orm ”) ; s e e a ls o G o o dr ic h v . B r io n e s ( I n r e Sc h w a r

z ko p f) , 62 6 F . 3d 10 32 , 10 37 (9th C i r. 2 0 1 0 ) ( s ta te la w d e te rm in e s w h e th e ra lte re g o liab ility ap p lie s ) . M o h s e n ’s c o n te n tio n th a t W u la c k s s ta n d in g is u n p e r s u a s iv e . M o h s e n ’s m o tio n to s tr ik e W u ’s a n s w e r in g b r ie f is d e n ie d . AF F I RME D.