alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (File No. 333-11409), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-18467), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-49817),
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-66361), Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (File No. 333-66367), Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-33421) and Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-52433) of our report dated February 4, 1999, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of IXC Communications, Inc. included in
the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                       /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Austin, Texas
     March 26, 1999
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                  (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                               ------------------------------
                                                                1997       1996        1995
                                                               ------------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>         <C>        <C>
BASIC EARNINGS
   Net income                                                  $1,087      $ 783      $  937
   Less: Preferred stock dividends                                (40)       (81)        -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Income available to common stockholders                     $1,047      $ 702      $  937
=============================================================================================

   Shares
       Weighted average number of  common shares outstanding    1,531      1,061       1,011

   Basic earnings per share                                    $ 0.68      $0.66      $ 0.93
=============================================================================================

DILUTED EARNINGS
   Income available to common stockholders                     $1,047      $ 702      $  937
   Net interest expense related to convertible debt               -          -           112
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Net income as adjusted                                      $1,047      $ 702      $1,049
=============================================================================================

   Shares
       Weighted average number of  common shares outstanding
           assuming effect of dilutive securities               1,607      1,122       1,215

   Fully diluted earnings per share                            $ 0.65      $0.63      $ 0.86
=============================================================================================
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00064-CV

NO. 02-17-00065-CV

NO. 02-17-00066-CV

NO. 02-17-00067-CV

NO. 02-17-00068-CV

MARCUS EUGENE BOONE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NOS. 1413540D, 1413538D, 1413539D, 1412646D, 1411974D

------------

ORDER

------------

In each case, Appellant Marcus Eugene Boone challenges the trial court’s

order to withdraw funds from his inmate trust account. See Palomo v. State, 322

S.W.3d 304, 305 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2010, order), disp. on merits, Nos.

07-10-00181-CV, 07-10-00182-CV, 07-10-00183-CV, 2010 WL 5250874 (Tex.

FILE COPY
App.—Amarillo, no pet.); see also Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315, 316 n.1 (Tex.

2009). Each order to withdraw is Attachment A to its corresponding May 5, 2016

judgment, “incorporated into the judgment[,] and made a part thereof.” The

amount of court costs in each order to withdraw does not match the

corresponding amount of court costs in the respective judgment and bill of cost. 

Instead, the amount of court costs in each order to withdraw is the cumulative

total of court costs for all five cases. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal in

each case, and both parties have filed briefs. 

We are unable to determine whether Appellant’s rights to due process

have been fully satisfied in the trial court. See Harrell, 286 S.W.3d at 321;

Palomo, 322 S.W.3d at 307. Appellant received notice via the order to withdraw

in each case. See Harrell, 286 S.W.3d at 321; Palomo, 322 S.W.3d at 307. He

also appears to have had “an adequate opportunity to compare the amounts

assessed by the trial court in the underlying criminal proceedings to the amounts”

listed in each order to withdraw. See Palomo, 322 S.W.3d at 307; see also

Harrell, 286 S.W.3d at 321. We are unable to determine, however, whether

Appellant has been . . . “afforded an adequate opportunity to alert the court of

any alleged errors. Because the trial court has not entered an appealable order

either granting or denying a motion to confirm, modify, correct, or rescind the

prior withdrawal notification, we find Appellant’s notices of appeal to be

premature.” Palomo, 322 S.W.3d at 307 (citation and internal quotation marks

omitted).

2

FILE COPY
Accordingly, we abate these appeals for 90 days from the date of this

order to allow Appellant time (1) to notify the trial court of any alleged error by

filing, as appropriate, a motion to modify, correct, or rescind the order to withdraw

funds in each case; (2) to present that motion to the trial court; (3) to schedule

any necessary hearing; and (4) to obtain from the trial court a written, appealable

order disposing of the motion in each case. See id. at 307–08. All appellate

deadlines in each case will run from the signing of the written, appealable order.

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the

attorneys of record, the appellant, the State, the trial court judge, the trial court

clerk, and the court reporter.

DATED March 21, 2017.

PER CURIAM

3

FILE COPY
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1

[ACNIELSEN LOGO]

                                     CONSENT

We hereby consent to the use of information from our monthly reports "Audit
Report Beer and Soft Drink", covering the period January 1993 to December 2004,
on Form 20-F of Quilmes Industrial (QUINSA Societe Anonyme). We further consent
to the use of our name in such Form 20-F, and to the filing of this consent as
an exhibit thereto and to the incorporation of this consent into any
registration statement that Quinsa may file.

      /s/ A.C.Nielsen
      A.C.Nielsen S.A. de C.V. Sucursal Argentina
      Adrian Sarrica
      Apoderado

Firma(s) Certificada(s) en Sello
de Actuacion Notarial N degrees F 001622433
Acta N degrees 073.-

               /s/ DR. ARMANDO S. PAGANELLI
               [SEAL]

      Tucuman 348 - (C1O49AAH) Buenos Aires
      Republica Argentina
      Phone: 4891-1100                                      [A VNU COMPANY LOGO]
      Fax: 4891-1120
      e-mail: servicios@acnielsen.com
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2037 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2037

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the option to 
      use rebased target amounts to all sole community hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2000

 Ms. Snowe (for herself and Mr. Helms) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the option to 
      use rebased target amounts to all sole community hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sole Community Hospital Fair Payment 
Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF OPTION TO USE REBASED TARGET AMOUNTS TO ALL SOLE 
              COMMUNITY HOSPITALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1886(b)(3)(I)(i) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(I)(i)) (as added by section 405 of the 
Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999, 
as enacted into law by section 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106-113) is 
amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subclause (I)--
                    (A) by striking ``for its cost reporting period 
                beginning during 1999 is paid on the basis of the 
                target amount applicable to the hospital under 
                subparagraph (C) and that''; and
                    (B) by striking ``such target amount'' and 
                inserting ``the target amount otherwise applicable to 
                the hospital under subparagraph (C) (referred to in 
                this clause as the `subparagraph (C) target amount')''; 
                and
            (2) in subclause (I), by striking ``target amount otherwise 
        applicable'' and all that follows through ``target amount')'' 
        and inserting ``subparagraph (C) target amount''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply as if included in the enactment of the Medicare, Medicaid, and 
SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999, as enacted into law by 
section 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106-113.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of BowaterIncorporated (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: August 4, 2004 /s/ David G. Maffucci   Name: David G. Maffucci Title: Chief Financial Officer
     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedisclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 209 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 209

  To prohibit States from imposing a family cap under the program of 
                temporary assistance to needy families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit States from imposing a family cap under the program of 
                temporary assistance to needy families.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF A FAMILY CAP UNDER THE TANF 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 408(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 608(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Ban on family cap.--A State to which a grant is made 
        under section 403 may not, under the State program funded under 
        this part, deny assistance to a family in respect of an 
        individual because the individual was born after the family 
        became eligible for or began receiving assistance under the 
        program.''.
    (b) Penalty.--Section 409(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
609(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(15) No tanf funds for program with family cap.--
        Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, a State that 
        violates section 408(a)(12) during a fiscal year shall remit to 
        the Secretary all funds paid to the State under this part for 
        the fiscal year, and no payment shall be made under this part 
        to a State that has in effect a program that would be funded 
        under this part but for a law, regulation, or policy that is 
        inconsistent with such section.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTNG FIRM

The
Board of Directors
Celestica Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements onForms S-8 (Nos. 333-9500,
333-9822, 333-9780, 333-71126, 333-66726, 333-63112, 333-88210 and 333-113591) and on
Forms F-3 (Nos. 333-12272, 333-50240, 333-69278 and 333-113728)of Celestica Inc. of our
report to the Board of Directors dated February 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Celestica Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears on
page F-1 in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 20-F of Celestica Inc.

|Toronto, Canada   |  | /s/KPMG LLP          
|----------------- |  | ---------------------
|February 10, 2006 |  | Chartered Accountants

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11273]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,550]


Chrysler, LLC, Trenton Engine Plant, Including On-Site Leased 
Workers from Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC and Devon 
Facility Management, Trenton, MI, Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on March 4, 2010, applicable to workers of 
Chrysler, LLC, Trenton Engine Plant, including on-site leased workers 
from Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC, Trenton, Michigan. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on March 12, 2010 (75 FR 
11915).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of automotive engines.
    New information shows that workers leased from Devon Facility 
Management were employed on-site at the Trenton, Michigan location of 
Chrysler, LLC, Trenton Engine Plant. The Department has determined that 
these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm 
to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Devon Facility Management 
working on-site at the Trenton, Michigan location of Chrysler, LLC, 
Trenton Engine Plant.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,550 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ''All workers of Chrysler, LLC, Trenton Engine Plant, including 
on-site leased workers from Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC 
and Devon Facility Management, Trenton, Michigan, who became totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after November 26, 
2007, through December 16, 2010, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of April 2010.
 Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-11273 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                    5
<CIK>                                               0001010005
<NAME>   Doctors Health, Inc. 10-K
       
<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              15,872,506
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,846,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                           193,706
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    29,250,409
<PP&E>                                               5,509,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,624,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      33,845,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               56,462,678
<BONDS>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                70,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               41,026,707
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (63,814,799)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        33,845,087
<SALES>                                             92,219,472
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    93,591,588
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      103,988,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    28,802,131
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,059,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (40,258,909)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (40,258,909)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (40,258,909)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (6.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (6.35)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the second
quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                           7,775,802
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         0
<PP&E>                                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  42,477,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    0
<BONDS>                                                        152,607,515
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (110,247,095)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    42,477,999
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 2,234,468
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   453,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               6,275,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (4,494,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (4,494,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (4,494,778)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         (59.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (59.32)


</TABLE>
Opinion issued February 1 8 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 01107
- CV

——————————— IN RE REFUGIO VELA, JR. , Relator

O rigi n al Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Refugio Vela, Jr., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, contending that the Harris County District Clerk has not performed his ministerial dut ies to receive and file papers, respond to correspondence, or “transmit documents to be served” in the trial court proceeding. 1

1 The respondent is the Honorable Chris Daniel, Harris County District Clerk. The underlying proceeding is cause number 2015

- 32658, Refugio Vela, Jr. v. Center Point Energy , in the 190th District Court of Harris County.2

This Court does not have jurisdiction to grant relator’s requested relief

. By statute, we have the authority only to issue a writ of mandamus against a district court judge or a county court judge within the Court’s jurisdiction, and may issue all writs necessary to enforce this Court’s appellate jurisdiction. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(a)

– (b) (West 2004). We do not have jur isdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk except to protect our jurisdiction. See In re Smith , 263 S.W.3d 93 , 95 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (citing In re Washington , 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1s t Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding))

. Accordingly, w e dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.