alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

National Security Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The National Security Agency hereby gives notice of its intent to grant FIXMO U.S. INC., a revocable, non-assignable, exclusive, license to practice the following Government-Owned invention as described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No.11/999,050 entitled: “Method of Tamper Detection for Digital Device,” which was allowed by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office on September 4, 2009, in the field of information security.

The above-mentioned invention is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the National Security Agency.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has fifteen (15) days from the date of this notice to file written objections along with any supporting evidence, if any.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the National Security Agency Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6541, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6541.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marian T. Roche, Director, Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6541, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6541, telephone (443) 479-9569.

Dated: May 11, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-11582 Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Mine Safety and Health Administration


Petitions for Modification

    This notice amends the petition for modification submitted by Lone 
Mountain Processing, Inc., on July 15, 2009, (Docket Number M-2009-024-
C). The amendment assigns a separate docket number for each of the 
mines listed. Lone Mountain Processing, Inc., filed a petition for 
modification of existing standard 30 CFR 75.503 (Permissible electric 
face equipment; maintenance) and 30 CFR 18.35 (Portable trailing cables 
and cords) for the Clover Fork No. 1 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 15-18647), 
Huff Creek No. 1 Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 15-17234), and Darby Fork No. 1 
Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 15-02263). MSHA published the notice in the Federal 
Register on December 21, 2009 (74 FR 67915). Initially, this petition 
for modification was assigned one docket number. After investigating 
these mines it has been determined that the conditions at the mines are 
different and a separate decision and order will be issued for each 
mine. This requires having separate docket numbers for each mine. A 
docket number is assigned for each of the mines as follows: (a) The 
Lone Mountain Processing, Inc., Clover Fork No. 1 Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 
15-18647), Docket No. M-2009-024-C; (b) Huff Creek No. 1 Mine (MSHA 
I.D. No. 15-17234), Docket No. M-2010-021-C; and (c) Darby Fork No. 1 
Mine, (MSHA I.D. No. 15-02263), Docket No. M-2010-022-C. These mines 
are located in Harlan County, Kentucky.

Patricia W. Silvey,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2010-11448 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of B&D Food Corp. (the “Company”) for
      the period ending March 31, 2008 on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on May 19, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Daniel
      Ollech, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/
                Daniel OllechMay 14, 2008
            **Daniel
                Ollech**
              **Chairman
                of the Board, President and**
              **Chief
                Executive Officer**
#### Mary L. Alderson, Respondent, v. Christopher Elmo Alderson, Appelant.

(No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred. Betts, J., not sitting.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND C. FOSS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

TODD ROWEN, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-15652 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00686-TLN-DB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017**

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Raymond C. Foss appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing as time-barred his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging 

false arrest and imprisonment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review de novo. Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-15652 

The district court properly dismissed Foss’s action as time-barred because,

even with the benefit of statutory tolling and accepting Foss’s argument that his 

claim accrued in October 2006, Foss failed to file this action within the applicable 

statute of limitations, and equitable tolling did not apply. See Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 

§ 335.1 (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims); Jones, 393 F.3d 

at 927 (§ 1983 claims are governed by the forum state’s statute of limitations for 

personal injury claims, including state law regarding tolling); Azer v. Connell, 306 

F.3d 930, 936 (9th Cir. 2002) (three-pronged test for equitable tolling in 

California).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by not holding an evidentiary 

hearing. See United States v. Schafer, 625 F.3d 629, 635 (9th Cir. 2010) (denial of 

evidentiary hearing is reviewed for abuse of discretion).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Foss’s motion for 

appointment of counsel because Foss did not show exceptional circumstances 

warranting such an appointment. See Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th 

Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review and explaining the “exceptional 

circumstances” requirement).

We reject as unsupported by the record Foss’s contention that he was 

prejudiced by defendant raising new issues in the reply brief because Foss was 
3 17-15652 

given an opportunity to file a sur-reply brief. 

AFFIRMED.
v150341_10-48 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing


     

    Exhibit
10.48
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,099
<PP&E>                                          72,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,310
<BONDS>                                         48,477
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,018
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,124)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,202
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    445
<INCOME-TAX>                                       192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                253
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
|  | Lobbying Disclosure Act:             SEC. 16. REPEAL OF THE RAMSPECK ACT. |  |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|

|  (a) REPEAL.—Subsection (c) of section 3304 of title 5, United States Code, is repealed. (b) REDESIGNATION.—Subsection (d) of section 3304 of title 5, United States Code, is redesignated as subsection (c). (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal and amendment made by this section shall take effect 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act..                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| Current through April 1, 2019— This compilation includes language from Public Law 104-65, as well as amending language from Public Laws 105-166 and 110-81 and 115-418. These materials are not official  evidence of the laws set forth herein. Sections 112 and 204 of title 1 of the United States Code establish the rules governing which text serves as legal evidence of the laws of the United States.

 For changes, after the closing date of this publication, to provisions of law in this publication, see the United States Code Classification Tables published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives at http://uscode.house.gov/classification/tables.shtml. |
# AITOECNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS

The Honorable Sam Kelley Consumer Credit Commissioner P. 0. Box 2107 Austin, Texas 78767 Opinion No. H- 709 Re: Whether an automobile insurance policy may be financed inamotor vehicle installment sales contract. Dear Commissioner Kelley: You have requested our opinion concerning whether the premium for a mechanical breakdown policy may be financed as part ofan installment sales contract under article 5069-7. 06(Z), V. T. C.S. Amechanical breakdown policy provides reimbursement for repairs to automobiles necessitated by the failure of certain mechanical parts. Article 5069-7. 06(2) provides: A seller or holder may; inaddition, request or require abuyer to insure tangible personal property involved in such a contract, made under authority of this Chapter, and include the cost of such insurance as a separate charge in such contract. Such insurance and the premiums or charges therefrom shall bear a reasonable relationship to the amount, term and conditions ofthe contract, the existing hazards or risk of loss, damage or destruction, and shall not provide for unusual or exceptional risks or coverages which are not ordinarily included inpolicies issued to the general public. Thus a seller may request or require insurance for tangible personal property involved ina sales contract, but such insurance may “not provide for unusual or exceptional risks or coverages which are not ordinarily included inpolicies issued to the general public, ”and any such insurance must relate to the sales contract. Inaddition, ifan insurance policy may be included ina sales contract under article 5069-7.06(2), itmay be required by the seller.

p.3058The Honorable Sam Kelley - page two (H-709)

Damage from mechanical breakdowns is expressly excluded from the coverage ofageneral automobile insurance policy. See Automobile Series No. 130, October 20, 1941, Board of Insurance Commissioners. We have been informed that few, ifany, mechanical breakdown policies have been written inTexas. Assuming this tobe true, we believe you would ‘berequired to find such protection presently would constitute II[coverage] not ordinarily included inpolicies issued to the general public, ”and therefore may not be included inan installment sales contract. Of course apurchaser is free to obtain mechanical breakdown insurance independently ofthe sales contract. SUMMARY Ifmechanical breakdown insurance is coverage not ordinarily included inpolicies issued tothe general public, such insurance may not be required or financed inan automobile installment sales contract under article 5069-7. 06(2),V. T. C.S. Xery truly yours,

Attorney General of Texas

Opinion Committee jad:

p*3059
**EXHIBIT      21**

**JAKKS      PACIFIC, INC. SUBSIDIARIES**

| **Subsidiary**                                         |   | **Jurisdiction**         |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                                   |   |                          |
| JAKKS                Pacific (HK) Limited              |   | Hong                Kong      |
| JAKKS                Pacific (Shenzhen) Company        |   | China                         |
| JAKKS                Pacific (Asia) Limited            |   | Hong                Kong      |
| JAKKS                Pacific/Kidz Biz Limited          |   | United                Kingdom |
| JPI                ColorWorkshop Limited               |   | United                Kingdom |
| JAKKS                Pacific/Kidz Biz Far East Limited |   | Hong                Kong      |
| Play                Along (Hong Kong) Limited          |   | Hong                Kong      |
| Road                Champs, Inc.                       |   | Delaware                      |
| Road                Champs Limited                     |   | Hong                Kong      |
| Flying                Colors Toys, Inc.                |   | Michigan                      |
| Flying                Colors Toys (HK) Ltd.            |   | Hong                Kong      |
| JPI                ColorWorkshop, Inc.                 |   | Delaware                      |
| PA                Distribution, Inc.                   |   | Delaware                      |
| Play                Along, Inc.                        |   | Delaware                      |
| Toymax                International, Inc.              |   | Delaware                      |
| Toymax                Inc.                             |   | New                York       |
| Toymax                (H.K.) Limited                   |   | Hong                Kong      |
| Funnoodle,                Inc.                         |   | Delaware                      |
| Funnoodle                (H.K.) Limited                |   | Hong                Kong      |
| Go                Fly A Kite, Inc.                     |   | Delaware                      |
| Go                Fly A Kite (H.K.) Limited            |   | Hong                Kong      |
| Creative                Designs International, Ltd.    |   | Delaware                      |
| Arbor                Toys Company Limited              |   | Hong                Kong      |

----
Order entered August 20, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00849 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 00850 - CR SHAQUANDALOND SHAVON N HAWKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F12 - 11897 - T , F12 - 62917 - T



### O RDER T he Court GRANTS court reporter Mary Snider’s motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record

. We ORDER Ms. Snider to file the reporter’s record within THIRTY (30) DAY S from the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                          OF TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE

      I, Paul L. Berns, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Bone Care
International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-K")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                /S/  PAUL L. BERNS
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Paul L. Berns
                                September 10, 2004

                                       62
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE YEAR
ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-25-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                       795
<INVENTORY>                                     28,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,683
<PP&E>                                          93,691
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,108
<BONDS>                                        141,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,261
<SALES>                                        172,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,738
<CGS>                                          140,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Marvin Brock, Appellant

No. 06-16-00069-CV v.

RJT Property & Management, LLC, 

Appellee

Appeal from the 95th District Court of 

Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. DC-16-

10872-D). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Marvin Brock, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### NUMBER 13

- 17

- 00437

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

RICARDO VAIZ AND

MARIA F. VAIZ

, Appellant s

,

v.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION, AURORA BANK, FSB

, LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, AND

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Appellee s

.

On a ppeal from the 138 t h District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.



## ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

On April 16, 2019, appellees filed a notice of bankruptcy in this appeal. On April

22, 2019, this Court, on request of the parties, abated this case due to an automatic stay

from a bankruptcy proceeding. See 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 8.2.2

On August 5 and August 18, 2021, the parties notified this Court that the

bankruptcy proceedings have been resolved and therefore, this case can now be

reinstated. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 8.3. According ly , this case is hereby REINSTATED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

24 th day of August 202 1

.