alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Renaker, et al. v. Adams’ Admr.

(Decided January 31, 1912.)

Appeal from Harrison Circuit Court.

Appeals — Jurisdiction—Contested Part of Debt Less Than $200.00.— The Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction of an appeal from a judgment rendered for the contested part of a debt which was less than $200, although there had been a demurrer-to the petition which was overruled, and judgment was then rendered for the uncontested part of the claim, the appeal being taken from the judgment of the contested part.

C. F. SPENCER for appellant.

DANIEL DURBIN for appellees.

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson

Dismissing.

Elizabeth D. Adams, as administratrix of J. D. Adams, deceased, brought this suit in the Harrison Circuit Court against J. Newt. Renaker and A. J. Renaker to recover judgment against them on a note for $500 executed by them to her intestate dated September 6, 1907, and due twelve months after date. A. J. Renaker filed a demurrer to the petition which was overruled. J. Newt. Renaker then filed an answer in which he conceded that he owed the plaintiff on the note $438, with interest from February 22, 1910, and pleaded a counterclaim for the remainder of the debt. The court entered a judgment against both the defendants for the uncontroverted part of the debt, and the action was referred to a special commissioner to report on the counterclaim which involved a question of usury. On the coming in of the commissioner’s report, the court entered judgment against *514tlie defendants for tiie remainder of the debt and from this judgment they have appealed. The administratrix has entered a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the amount in controversy is less than $200.

It is conceded that after deducting the uncontro-verted part of the debt, the balance left in controversy is less than $200, but it is insisted for the appellants that as A. J. Renaker demurred to the petition, and his demurrer was overruled, an appeal lies because all the debt was in controversy on the demurrer. We had this precise question before us in K. & P. Lumber Co. v. Sledge, 143 Ky., 137, and we there held that as the amount really in controversy was less than $200, this court was without jurisdiction. The facts of this case well illustrates the soundness of the rule we there laid down. No serious complaint is made of the sufficiency of the petition. The complaint is of alleged errors of the commissioner and the court as to the matter of usury, and relates to the contested part of the claim. The thing in. controversy here is only this matter of usury. The judgment for the uncontested part of the claim was rendered on March 3,1910. The judgment for the contested part of the claim was rendered at the November term, 1910. In the statement in the record made pursuant to the Code the judgment appealed from is given in these words:

> “Pinal judgment, November term of the Harrison Circuit Court, December 1, 1910.”

There is no reference in the statement to the judgment for the uncontested part of the debt, and this part of the debt is in no sense in contest on the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Jerome Realty Corporation, Judgment Creditor, Respondent, *v.*Henry Clay Willis and David Leavenworth, as Substituted Committee of Henry Clay Willis, Incompetent, Judgment Debtors. Veterans Administration, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 25, 1936.

*James A. Clark [Leo J. Boss*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Emanuel Goldberg [Julius Goldstein*of counsel], for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

While it is not clear on the facts established that the funds in the hands of the committee were such as were exempt from execution under the Federal statute protecting veterans’ compensation, it is plain that the procedure adopted herein was wholly unwarranted.

*165The jurisdiction, over the incompetent's estate was exclusively in the Supreme Court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1356.) An action against the committee in the Municipal Court, without permission, was unjustified under the circumstances. Though this irregularity might be overlooked in a proper case, there was no authority in the court below to direct payment of the judgment out of the estate of the incompetent. The proper procedure is for the creditor to apply to the Supreme Court for an order directing the committee to pay.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without prejudice to application to the Supreme Court for the proper relief.

All concur. Present ■— Levy, Callahan and Frankenthaler, JJ.
----

|  |  | I, Yitschak Barabi, certify that: |
|--|--|-----------------------------------|

|  | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of G. Willi-Food International Ltd.; and |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,                  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.Date: January 21, 2020 |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:/s/ Yitschak BarabiYitschak BarabiFinance Manager |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MURRAY 
INCOME PROPERTIES I, LTD. AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURE BALANCE SHEET AND 
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,451,337
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  755,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,990
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,200,587
<PP&E>                                      26,527,308
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,354,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,654,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,309
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,891,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,654,564
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               819,036
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,293)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                301,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            301,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   301,507
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.47
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------




We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Prospectuses
constituting  part  of  the  Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-59567,
333-11703,  333-11703-01,  333-67843  and 333-81029) and to the incorporation by
reference  in  the  Registration  Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-80978, 33-4042,
33-27203,  33-29498,  33-46968, 33-51691, 333-08005, 333-27313 and 333-81031) of
Triton  Energy  Limited  of our report dated February 23, 2000 appearing on page
F-2  of  this  Form  10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
Dallas,  Texas
March  8,  2000
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Big Buck Brewery & Steakhouse, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the annual period
ended December 29, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony P. Dombrowski, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: February 23, 2004 |  | By | /s/ANTHONY P. DOMBROWSKIAnthony P. Dombrowski Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ |  | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

12-6-2005

USA v. Hlinak

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-3780

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Hlinak" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 159.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/159
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-3780

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JEFFREY HLINAK,

 Appellant

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 04-cr-00091)

District Judge: Honorable William W. Caldwell

 

Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

November 14, 2005

Before: ROTH, FUENTES, and BECKER, Circuit Judges.

(Filed December 6, 2005)

OPINION OF THE COURT

 

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Jeffrey Hlinak’s response to this Court’s Order dated March 7, 2005

regarding the applicability of United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005), states that he
“challenges only his sentence.” Pursuant to said Order, such a statement is to be

“construed as waiving any issues related to the conviction.” We therefore address only

the sentencing issue. In United States v. Davis, 407 F.3d 162 (3d Cir. 2005) (en banc)–an

opinion relating to the denial of a government petition for rehearing en banc concerning a

Booker claim on plain-error review–this Court stated that except in limited circumstances,

we will presume prejudice and direct a remand for resentencing where the District Court

imposed a sentence in the belief that the applicable Sentencing Guidelines were

mandatory. That was the situation here, and we perceive no circumstance in this case

which warrants a different result from that found in Davis. Having determined that the

sentencing issues appellant raises are best determined by the District Court in the first

instance, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Appellant’s request for summary

remand is GRANTED. The Appellant's sentence is VACATED and this matter is

REMANDED for resentencing in accordance with Booker.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0020]


Agency Information Collection (Designation of Beneficiary) 
Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits 
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, has submitted the 
collection of information abstracted below to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes 
the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and 
burden and includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 10, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the collection of information 
through http://www.Regulations.gov or to VA's OMB Desk Officer, OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-7316. Please refer to ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0020'' in any correspondence.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 
Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7485, fax (202) 273-0443 or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88ecede6e1fbeda6e5ebe4e9e5eac8fee9a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe9a9b90978d9bd0939d929f939cbe889fd0999188">[email protected]</span></a>. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0020.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Designation of Beneficiary, Government Life Insurance, VA 
Form 29-336.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0020.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: VA Form 29-336 is completed by the insured to designate a 
beneficiary and select an optional settlement to be used when the 
Government Life Insurance matures by death.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on March 2, 2010, at pages 9490-9491.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 13,917 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 83,500.

    Dated: May 6, 2010.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Denise McLamb,
Program Analyst, Enterprise Records Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-11157 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2290

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the definition of

contribution in aid of construction.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 23, 2000

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. REID) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

the definition of contribution in aid of construction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF CONTRIBUTION IN AID OF

4 CONSTRUCTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

6 118(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

7 to definitions) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(A) CONTRIBUTION IN AID OF CONSTRUC9 TION.—The term ‘contribution in aid of con10 struction’ shall be defined by regulations pre-
2

•S 2290 IS

1 scribed by the Secretary, except that such

2 term—

3 ‘‘(i) shall include amounts paid as

4 customer connection fees (including

5 amounts paid to connect the customer’s

6 line to or extend a main water or sewer

7 line), and

8 ‘‘(ii) shall not include amounts paid as

9 service charges for starting or stopping

10 services.’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the

13 amendments made by section 1613(a) of the Small Busi14 ness Job Protection Act of 1996.

Æ
No. 1,848.

#### STATE, Appellant, *v.*McDONALD et al., Respondents.

*Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; J. B. Mc-Clernan, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided November 28, 1902.

*Mr. James Donovan, Attorney General,*for the State.

*Mr. B. S. Thresher,*and *Mr. J. L. Wines,*for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

— -Dpon motion of the attorney general, the appeal herein is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





Written
      Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
      (“Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant.





Date:
      February 29, 2008





/s/
                JOEL M. BENNETTJOEL
                M. BENNETT*Executive
                Vice President and**Chief
                Financial Officer*
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 4.4

                          [FORM OF FACE OF CERTIFICATE]



              Organized Under the Laws of the State of South Dakota


                                                           CLASS D CAPITAL UNITS
D-

                            GREAT PLAINS ETHANOL, LLC

 THIS CERTIFIES THAT__________________________________________ IS THE OWNER AND
 REGISTERED HOLDER OF_____________________________________________ CLASS D
 CAPITAL UNITS

                          in Great Plains Ethanol, LLC

 TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY THE HOLDER
 HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS
 CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SAID LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAS CAUSED
       THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE SIGNED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS THIS
                            DAY OF           , 200__.


  _________________                                         _________________
      SECRETARY                                                 PRESIDENT


<PAGE>





                        [FORM OF REVERSE OF CERTIFICATE]

             The Capital Units represented by this Certificate have
            not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
               amended. The sale and transfer of the Capital Units
             represented by this Certificate are restricted by, and
            subject to, the provisions of the Operating Agreement of
               Great Plains Ethanol, LLC. The Operating Agreement
             provides, among other things, that no sale, assignment,
             transfer, gift, exchange or other disposition of these
             Capital Units is valid except as specifically provided
             for in the Operating Agreement. Copies of the Operating
             Agreement and instructions for transfer, sale or other
              disposition of these Capital Units are available for
                  inspection at the Company's principal office.


FOR VALUE RECEIVED __________ HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER UNTO
___________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ CAPITAL UNITS REPRESENTED
BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE, AND DO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT
____________________________________________________ ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE
SAID CAPITAL UNITS ON THE BOOKS OF THE WITHIN NAMED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.
DATED         ____________________, 20_____ __________________

IN PRESENCE OF ___________________________________________________

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27579-27580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAN01000.L10200000.XZ0000]


Notice of Public Meeting: Northwest California Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 
the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
Northwest California Resource

[[Page 27580]]

Advisory Council will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday and Friday, July 15-16, 2010, 
in Redding, California. On July 15, the RAC convenes at 10 a.m. at the 
Oxford Suites, 1967 Hilltop Drive, and departs immediately for a field 
tour. On July 16, the RAC convenes at 8 a.m. in the conference center 
at the Oxford Suites. Time for public comment has been reserved for 11 
a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Haug, BLM Northern California 
District manager, (530) 221-1743; or BLM Public Affairs Officer Joseph 
J. Fontana, (530) 252-5332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Northwest 
California. At this meeting agenda topics include discussion of access 
to Cow Mountain, a report on salmon recovery work on public lands, an 
overview of forest practices, an update on a wind energy proposal for 
Walker Ridge and an update on management of the Sacramento River Bend 
area. All meetings are open to the public. Members of the public may 
present written comments to the council. Each formal council meeting 
will have time allocated for public comments. Depending on the number 
of persons wishing to speak, and the time available, the time for 
individual comments may be limited. Members of the public are welcome 
on field tours, but they must provide their own transportation and 
meals. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation and other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: May 6, 2010.
Joseph J. Fontana,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-11635 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P