Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules 26157 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves establishing a temporary 

safety zone around a fireworks display 

and is therefore expected to be 

categorically excluded, under section 

2.B.2. Figure 2–1, paragraph 34(g), of the 

Instruction. The fireworks are launched 

from land and the safety zone is 

intended to keep mariners away from 

any fall out that may enter the water. A 

preliminary environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

is available in the docket where 

indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek 

any comments or information that may 

lead to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T05–0294 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T05–0294 Safety Zone; Shore Thing 

& Independence Day Fireworks, 

Chesapeake Bay, Norfolk, VA. 

(a) Regulated Area. The following area 

is a safety zone: Specified waters of the 

Chesapeake Bay located within a 210 

foot radius of the fireworks display at 

approximate position 36°57′17′′ N/ 

076°15′00′′ W (NAD 1983) in the 

vicinity of Ocean View Beach Park, 

Norfolk, VA. 

(b) Definition. For the purposes of this 

part, Captain of the Port Representative 

means any U.S. Coast Guard 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

who has been authorized by the Captain 

of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to 

act on his behalf. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in 165.23 of this 

part, entry into this zone is prohibited 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port, Hampton Roads or his designated 

representatives. 

(2) The operator of any vessel in the 

immediate vicinity of this safety zone 

shall: 

(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon 

being directed to do so by any 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

on shore or on board a vessel that is 

displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign. 

(ii) Proceed as directed by any 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

on shore or on board a vessel that is 

displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign. 

(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton 

Roads can be reached through the Sector 

Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads 

in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone 

Number (757) 668–5555. 

(4) The Coast Guard Representatives 

enforcing the safety zone can be 

contacted on VHF–FM marine band 

radio channel 13 (165.65 Mhz) and 

channel 16 (156.8 Mhz). 

(d) Enforcement Period: This 

regulation will be enforced on July 4, 

2010, with a rain date of July 5, 2010, 

from 9 p.m. until 10 p.m. 

Dated: 24 April, 2010. 

M.S. Ogle, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Hampton Roads. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11085 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0293] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Reedville July 4th 

Celebration, Cockrell’s Creek, 

Reedville, VA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes 

establishing a temporary safety zone on 

Cockrell’s Creek in the vicinity of 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
26158 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Reedville, VA in support of the 

Reedville July 4th Celebration event. 

This action is intended to restrict vessel 

traffic movement on Cockrell’s Creek to 

protect mariners from the hazards 

associated with fireworks displays. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before June 1, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2010–0293 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail LT Tiffany Duffy, 

Chief Waterways Management Division, 

Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; 

telephone (757) 668–5580, e-mail 

Tiffany.A.Duffy@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2010–0293), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2010–0293’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010– 

0293’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

For information on facilities or 

services for individuals with disabilities 

or to request special assistance at the 

public meeting, contact Lieutenant 

Tiffany Duffy, Chief Waterways 

Management Division, Sector Hampton 

Roads at the telephone number or e-mail 

address indicated under the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 

this notice. 

Basis and Purpose 

On July 2, 2010 Greater Reedville 

Association will sponsor a fireworks 

display on Cockrell’s Creek. The 

proposed safety zone is intended to 

protect the public from any fall out that 

may enter the water. Due to the need to 

protect mariners and spectators from the 

hazards associated with the fireworks 

display, access to Cockrell’s Creek 

within 420 feet of the fireworks display 

will be temporarily restricted. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes 

establishing a safety zone on specified 

waters of Cockrell’s Creek in the vicinity 

of Reedville, Virginia. This safety zone 

will encompass all navigable waters 

within 420 feet of the fireworks display 

located at position 37°49′54′′ N/ 

076°16′44′′ W (NAD 1983). This 

proposed safety zone will be established 

in the interest of public safety during 

the Reedville July 4th Celebration event 

and will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10 

p.m. on July 2, 2010. Access to the 

safety zone will be restricted during the 

specified date and times. Except for 

participants and vessels authorized by 

the Captain of the Port or his 

Representative, no person or vessel may 

enter or remain in the regulated area. 

The Coast Guard expects the 

temporary final rule will be effective 

less than 30 days after publication in the 

Federal Register because delaying the 

effective date would be contrary to the 

public interest due to the need to 

protect the public from the dangers 

associated with the fireworks display. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules 26159 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. Although this proposed 

regulation restricts access to the safety 

zone, the effect of this rule will not be 

significant because: (i) The safety zone 

will be in effect for a limited duration; 

(ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii) 

the Coast Guard will make notifications 

via maritime advisories so mariners can 

adjust their plans accordingly. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities because the zone will only be in 

place for a limited duration and 

maritime advisories will be issued 

allowing the mariners to adjust their 

plans accordingly. However, this rule 

may affect the following entities, some 

of which may be small entities: the 

owners and operators of vessels 

intending to transit or anchor in that 

portion of Cockrell’s Creek from 8 p.m. 

to 10 p.m. on July 2, 2010. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Lieutenant 

Tiffany Duffy, Chief, Waterways 

Management Division, Sector Hampton 

Roads at (757) 668–5580. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this proposed rule or any policy or 

action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
26160 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 11, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves establishing a safety zone 

around a fireworks display. The 

fireworks are launched from land and 

the safety zone is intended to keep 

mariners away from any fall out that 

may enter the water. Therefore this rule 

is expected to be categorically excluded, 

under section 2.B.2. Figure 2–1, 

paragraph 34(g), of the Instruction. 

A preliminary environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

is available in the docket where 

indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek 

any comments or information that may 

lead to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T05–0293 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T05–0293 Safety Zone; Reedville 

July 4th Celebration, Cockrell’s Creek, 

Reedville, VA. 

(a) Regulated Area. The following area 

is a safety zone: specified waters of 

Cockrell’s Creek located within a 420 

foot radius of the fireworks display at 

approximate position 37°49′54′′ N/ 

076°16′44′′ W (NAD 1983) in the 

vicinity of Reedville, VA. 

(b) Definition. For the purposes of this 

part, Captain of the Port Representative 

means any U.S. Coast Guard 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

who has been authorized by the Captain 

of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to 

act on his behalf. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in 165.23 of this 

part, entry into this zone is prohibited 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port, Hampton Roads or his designated 

representatives. 

(2) The operator of any vessel in the 

immediate vicinity of this safety zone 

shall: 

(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon 

being directed to do so by any 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

on shore or on board a vessel that is 

displaying a U.S. Coast Guard ensign. 

(ii) Proceed as directed by any 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

on shore or on board a vessel that is 

displaying a U.S. Coast Guard ensign. 

(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton 

Roads can be reached through the Sector 

Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads 

in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone 

Number (757) 668–5555. 

(4) The Coast Guard Representatives 

enforcing the safety zone can be 

contacted on VHF–FM marine band 

radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and 

channel 16 (156.8 Mhz). 

(d) Enforcement Period: This 

regulation will be enforced on July 2, 

2010 from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. 

Dated: April 24, 2010. 

M.S. Ogle, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Hampton Roads. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11087 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

38 CFR Part 1 

RIN 2900–AN42 

Drug and Drug-Related Supply 

Promotion by Pharmaceutical 

Company Sales Representatives at VA 

Facilities 

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; republication. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans 

Affairs (VA) is republishing the 

proposed rule document that was 

published on May 5, 2010, in the 

Federal Register to provide the address 

that the public needs to submit their 

comments. In that document, we 

inadvertently omitted the ADDRESSES

section for public comments. As a 

convenience to the public, instead of 

merely publishing a correction 

document, we are republishing the 

entire proposed rule with the 

ADDRESSES section and a new 60-day 

comment period. These are the only two 

changes made to the proposed rule. 

The purposes of the proposed rule are 

to reduce or eliminate any potential for 

disruption in the patient care 

environment, manage activities and 

promotions at VA facilities, and provide 

sales representatives with a consistent 

standard of permissible business 

practice at VA facilities. It would also 

facilitate mutually beneficial 

relationships between VA and such 

sales representatives. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

VA on or before July 12, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be 

submitted through http:// 

www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand 

delivery to the Director, Regulations 

Management (02REG), Department of 

Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., 

NW, Room 1068, Washington, DC 

20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026. 

Comments should indicate that they are 

submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900– 

AN42—Drug and Drug-Related Supply 

Promotion by Pharmaceutical Company 

Sales.’’ Copies of comments received 

will be available for public inspection in 

the Office of Regulation Policy and 

Management, Room 1063B, between the 

hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday (except holidays). Please 

call (202) 461–4902 (this is not a tollfree number) for an appointment. In 

addition, during the comment period, 

comments may be viewed online 

through the Federal Docket Management 

System at http://www.Regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Louis E. Cobuzzi, PBM Services (119), 

Veterans Health Administration, 

Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 

Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 

20420; (202) 461–7362. (This is not a 

toll-free number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 5, 

2010, VA published this proposed rule 

in the Federal Register at 75 FR 24510, 

with an error. We inadvertently omitted 

the ADDRESSES section for public 

comments. We are republishing the 

proposed rule with the address 

information where the public can 

submit their comments and with a new 

60-day comment period. 

Under 38 U.S.C. 303, the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs is responsible for ‘‘the 

proper execution and administration of 

all laws administered by the Department 

and for the control, direction, and 

management of the Department.’’ The 

Secretary has authority to prescribe all 

rules necessary to carry out the laws 

administered by the Department, such 

as section 303 regarding control and 

management of the Department. See 38 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1