alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         412,652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,336,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    515,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,732,682
<PP&E>                                         953,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,184,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,611,737
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        913
<COMMON>                                       105,641
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,025,981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,184,030
<SALES>                                      3,468,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,468,182
<CGS>                                        2,196,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,196,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,551,137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             289,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,569,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,569,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,569,125)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2212

To suspend temporarily the duty on meta-chlorobenzaldehyde.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7, 2000

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on metachlorobenzaldehyde.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. META-CHLOROBENZALDEHYDE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.28.08 MetaChlorobenzaldehyde (CAS No.

587–04–2) (provided for in subheading

2913.00.40) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•S 2212 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit
4.26

     

    [Translation
of Chinese Original]

     

    Power
of Attorney

     

    Principal:
Shizhou Shen

     

    Address:
No. 1902, F15, Huaqing Jiayuan, Haidian District, Beijing

     

    Attorney-in-Fact:
Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd.

     

    Registered
Address: Room 406, Floor, Building B, 5-2, Jing-Meng Hi-Tech Mansion, Shangdi
East Road, Haidian District, Beijing

     

    Scope of
Authorization:

     

    Shizhou
Shen, the Principal, hereby irrecoverably authorizes Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd.
(or its designated third party) as his Attorney-in-Fact to exercise within the
term of this Power of Attorney the following rights:

     

    Beijing
Super TV Co., Ltd. (or its designated third party) is authorized as the
Attorney-in-Fact of Shizhou Shen to exercise all voting rights enjoyed by the
latter in accordance with applicable laws and the Articles of Association in the
general meeting of shareholders of Beijing Novel-Super Digital TV Technology
Co., Ltd. (“DTV Company”), including but not limited to sale or transfer all or
any shares held by Shizhou Shen in DTV Company, and nomination and appointment
of directors of the DTV Company as the authorized Attorney-in-Fact of Shizhou
Shen in the general meeting of shareholders of DTV Company.

     

    Any legal
liability arising from all and any authorized activity carried out by the
Attorney-in-Fact within the scope of authorization shall be assumed by Shizhou
Shen.

     

    The term
of this Power of Attorney is 10 years starting from the date this Power of
Attorney is executed, unless the Loan Agreement (Attachment 1) executed by and
between Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd and Shizhou Shen, and its supplementary
agreements thereto are terminated for whatsoever reason. If the Loan Agreement
(Attachment 1) is extended for a certain period, this Power of Attorney shall be
automatically extended for the same period. All and any issues in connection
with this Power of Attorney shall be governed by Chinese laws. This Power of
Attorney is written in Chinese.

     

    Principal:
/s/ Shizhou Shen

     

    November
24, 2008

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    Attachment
1:  Loan Agreement (omitted)
#### WHERRY, Appellant, *v.*SPRINKLE et al., Respondents.

(No. 3,455.)

(Submitted January 8, 1915.

Decided January 20, 1915.)

[146 Pac. 735.]

*Appeal*— Presumptions—Burden *of Showing Error on Appellant.*

1. On an appeal from an order granting a new trial made by a judge other than the one who heard the cause, the appellant, as in all other cases, has the burden of overcoming the presumption that the ruling appealed from is correct; hence where no error is assigned nor any attempt made to show the impropriety of the order appealed from, affirmance of the order follows.

*Appeal from District Court of Blaine County; John*W. *Tattan, Judge.*

Action by Tollie F. Wherry against Chas. E. Sprinkle and another. Judgment for plaintiff, who appeals from an order granting defendant a new trial.

Affirmed.

*Mr. W. B. Sands,*for Appellant, submitted a brief and argued the cause orally.

*Mr. B. E. O’Keefe*and W. *U. Kuhr,*for Respondents, submitted a brief; *Mr. 0 ’Keefe*argued the cause orally.

MR. JUSTICE SANNER

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause was tried in the district court of Blaine county before Hon. Frank N. Utter, one of the judges thereof. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, and defendants moved for a new trial assigning all the statutory grounds. Judge Utter, having been disqualified, called upon Hon. John W. Tattan, the other judge of said court, to hear and determine the motion, and he, by a general order, granted the same. This appeal is from that order.

The appellant, laboring under the mistaken notion that the burden is on the respondent to vindicate the order, assigns no *192
      [1], error nor seeks in any way to show its impropriety. It has been too often repeated to require citation that this court approaches every case with the assumption that the ruling appealed from is correct. The fact that the judge who made the order was not the one who presided at the trial affects the indulgence with which we view his judgment on the evidence, but does not deprive him of all judicial faculty in passing upon the record. *(In re Williams’ Estate, ante,*p. 142.) On appeal from such an order, therefore, as in all other cases, the appellant must take the burden.

There being nothing before us upon which the order appealed from may be questioned, the same is accordingly affirmed.

MR. Chief Justioe Brantly and Mr. Justice Holloway concur.

Rehearing denied March 9, 1915.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2298

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
definition of homebound with respect to home health services under the 
                           medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2000

  Mr. Jeffords (for himself, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Leahy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
definition of homebound with respect to home health services under the 
                           medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homebound Clarification Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF HOMEBOUND.

    (a) In General.--Sections 1814(a) and 1835(a) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a); 1395n(a)) are each amended in the 
last sentence--
            (1) by striking ``leave home,'' and inserting ``leave home 
        and''; and
            (2) by striking ``, and that absences'' and all that 
        follows before the period.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services provided on or after the date of enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Written
      Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
      (“Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant.





Date:
      February 29, 2008





/s/
                JACK FRIEDMANJACK
                FRIEDMAN*Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TowerBancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Franklin T. Klink, III, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Franklin T. Klink, III |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |
|   | November 7, 2007           |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation in the Registration Statement on Form F-3
of G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (the "Company") dated April 13, 2000, of our
report dated March 31, 2003 relating to our audit of the Company's consolidated
balance sheets as at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and to the reference in the
Registration Statement to our firm under the heading "Experts".

Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Tel- Aviv, November 21, 2004.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,805
<SECURITIES>                                    76,780
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                       923
<INVENTORY>                                      4,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,848
<PP&E>                                          17,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,810
<SALES>                                         23,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,421
<CGS>                                           15,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   282
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,331)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.29)


</TABLE>
----

| Date:  August      4, 2008 |                                       |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | /s/ Richard A.      Hubbell           |   |
|                                 | Richard      A. Hubbell                    |   |
|                                 | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                 | (Principal      Executive Officer)         |   |

| Date:  August      4, 2008 |                                                       |   |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | /s/ Ben      M. Palmer                           |   |
|                                 | Ben      M. Palmer                                         |   |
|                                 | Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                                 | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)          |
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

National Institute for Occupational

 Safety and Health

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998

 Phone: 513-533-6800

 Fax: 513-533-6826

 

 January 9, 2006

SEC00044

Peter M. Turcic, Director

Division of Energy Employees Occupational

Illness Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

Room C-4511

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20210

Dear Mr. Turcic:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. pt. 83.17(c), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees at the Linde Ceramics Plant, in Tonawanda, New York, as an addition to the 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000. On December 8, 2005, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the 

Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

Atomic weapons employees who worked at the Linde Ceramics Plant 

from October 1, 1942, through October 31, 1947, and who were 

employed for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work 

days occurring within the parameters (excluding aggregate work day

requirements) established for other classes of employees included in 

the SEC.

This designation became effective on January 7, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on January 7, 2006, members of this class of employees, defined as

reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

Sincerely,

[Signature on File]

Larry J. Elliott, MSPH, CIH

Director

Office of Compensation

 Analysis and Support
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  Schedule  contains  Summary  Financial   Information  Extracted  from
Unaudited  Financial  Statements,  December  31,  1997 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,515
<PP&E>                                         21,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,865)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          778,919
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,218,180
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,947,602)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,497
<SALES>                                        47,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,468
<CGS>                                          353,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  353,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,193,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,512,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,512,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,512,215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.10)
        


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00226-CV

Henry J. Novak and Bastrop Heritage Oaks, Ltd., Appellants

v.

Robert Patterson, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 24,154, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellee Robert Patterson filed with this Court a motion to dismiss appeal for want

of jurisdiction, informing this Court that appellants Henry J. Novak and Bastrop Heritage Oaks, Ltd.

failed to timely file their notice of appeal. We will grant Patterson’s motion and dismiss the appeal

for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 

According to the clerk’srecord, the trial courtsigned the final judgment in this cause

on January 14, 2003. Appellants filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on

January 31, 2003. Thus, a notice of appeal was due to be filed on April 14, 2003. See id. 26.1(a)(4).

Appellants filed their notice of appeal on April 17, 2003; they did not file a motion to extend time

to file their notice of appeal. 

Because appellants did not file their notice of appeal until more than ninety days after

the final judgment was signed, their notice of appeal was untimely. The time period for filing a
2

perfecting instrument is jurisdictional. Velasquez v. Harrison, 934 S.W.2d 767, 770 (Tex.

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1996, no writ). When an appellant fails to file timely a perfecting

instrument or properly seek an extension of time to file a perfecting instrument, the appellate court

must dismiss the cause for lack of jurisdiction. Id. 

Because appellants’ notice of appeal was not timely filed, this Court is without

jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss this appeal for

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 

 

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction on Appellee’s Motion

Filed: August 29, 2003
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the
Annual Report of Air Industries Group, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the
year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Michael E. Recca,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350), that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated: April 29, 2020                                         | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                              | 
|/s/ Michael E. Recca                                          | 
|Michael E. Recca                                              | 
|Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer) | 



[A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Air Industries Group and will be retained by Air Industries Group and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]