alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jackson v. Bailey.

1. The recording act does not operate as to tax deeds so as to cure jurisdictional defects in the assessment roll.

2. Under Rev. Code Civ. Proc. sec. 55, conferring title on one possessing color of title to land and paying taxes in good faith for 10 successive years, no rights were acquired by plaintifLwhere the tax deed on which he relied was issued to his grantor, September 19, 189 6, and his action to quiet title, based on the deed, was commenced September 20, 1900.

(Opinion filed July 6, 1905.)

Appeal from circuit court, Beadle county; Hon. Loring E. Gappy, Judge.

Action by Wellington Jackson against John M. Bailey. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*H. S. Mouser,*for appellant.

*Campbell & Taylor,*for respondent.

Fuller, J.

This action to quiet title, based on a tax deed regular upon its face, and recorded three years, was defeated by proof of what appellant, with commendable frankness, concedes to be jurisdictional defects of the description in the assment roll, as follows:

> *595Section or Lot. Town or Block. Range.

> N. E. 34 ■ 127 ' 66

In Moran v. Thomas et al. (decided at this term) 104 N. W. 212, it is held by a majority of this court that the recording act does not operate to-cure jurisdictional defects. That case is decisive of the point here presented.

The tax deed relied upon was issued to plaintiff’s grantor September 19, 1896, and, as the action was commenced September 20, 1900, no rights were acquired under section 55 of the Revised Code of Civil Procedure, which confers title upon a person possessing color of title and paying taxes in good faith for 10 successive years. This court recently held, in Bennett v. Moore, 18 S. D. 109, 99 N. W. 855, that a certificate of purchase issued on a tax sale constitutes no color of title, and that the statutory limitation is not effective unless 10 years intervene between the execution of the deed and the commencement of the action.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
## NO. 12-09-00208-CR NO. 12-09-00209-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S

GARRY S TEVEN A LBRIGHT, § APPEAL F ROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF TH E ST ATE OFTEX

AS, APP ELL EE § SMI TH CO UN TY

, T EXAS
MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM These appea ls a

re be ing dismi ssed for w ant of jurisdiction. After entering a guilty plea in eac h case , Appellant wa s convicted of “ac cident involving injury/death” a nd “intoxicated assault with a vehic le causing serious b o d i l y i n j u ry.” Sente nce in e ach c ase w as imposed on May 6, 2009. Texa s Rule of Appellate Procedur e 26.2 provides that an appe al is perf ecte d when notice of appe al is f

iled within thirty days afte r the day sentenc e is imposed or suspende d in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2(a) (1). Wher e a timely moti on for ne w trial has be en filed, notice of appea l shall be filed within ninety days af ter the se ntence is im p o s ed o r s u s p ended in ope n court. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2(a)( 2). Appe llant did not file a motion for new tria l in either case . There fore , his notice of appea l w as due on or be fore June 5, 2009. Howeve r, Appe llant did not file his notice of appea l until July 9, 2009 and did not file a mot ion fo r e xte ns ion of

tim e to f ile his no tic e of

app e a l a s p e rm itt e d by Te xa s Rule of Ap pe llate Procedur e 26.3. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3 (appellate court may e xtend time for f iling noti ce of appea l if, within fifteen da ys after deadline f

or filing notice of a

ppeal, a ppellant files notice of
app e a l in tr ia l cou rt a nd mot ion c omp lyi ng wi th T e xa s Ru le of Ap pe llate Pr oc e du re 10 .5 (b ) i n appellate court).2

On July 10, 2009, this court noti fied Appellant that his notice of a ppeal wa s untimely and that there was no timely motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appe al as pe rmitted by rule 26.3. Appellant was further informed that the a

ppeals would be dismiss ed unless, on or befor e July 20, 2009, the information filed in these a ppeals wa s amende d to show the jurisdiction of this court. On July 17, 2009, Appellant r esponded to this court’s notice . Howeve r, he did not furnish informa tion establishing thi s court’s jurisdiction. Because this court has no authority to allow the late filing of a notice of appeal exc ept as provided by r

ule 26.3, the appeals must be dismissed. See Sla ton v . St ate , 981 S.W.2d 208, 21 0 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); O li v o v . Sta te , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)

. Acc ordingly, these appe als are dismiss ed for want of juri sdiction

. Opinion delivere d July 31, 2009. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBLISH)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0325

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA RICHARD LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 23 2022

12/23/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0325
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM10-13-000]


Credit Reforms in Organized Wholesale Electric Markets; Further 
Notice Concerning Technical Conference

May 10, 2010.
    Take notice that on May 11, 2010, the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission staff will convene a technical conference related to the 
Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Credit Reforms in 
Organized Wholesale Electric Markets,\1\ as previously announced.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This workshop is being held in accordance with the 
Commission's order Obtaining Guidance on Regulatory Requirements, 
123 FERC ] 61,157 (2008).
    \2\ Notice of Technical Conference, 75 FR 20991, as supplemented 
by Notice of Agenda for Technical Conference, issued May 5, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The discussions at the conference, which is open to the public, may 
address matters at issue in the following Commission proceedings:

Docket No. ER10-942-000, ISO New England Inc., and New England Power 
Pool.
Docket No. ER10-1190-000, ISO New England Inc., and New England Power 
Pool.
Docket No. ER10-1196-000, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., and PJM 
Settlement, Inc.

    For more information, please contact Sarah McKinley, 202-502-8368, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3b0a2b1a2abedaea0a8aaadafa6ba83a5a6b1a0eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d2e3c2f3c3573303e3634333138241d3b382f3e733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>; for logistical issues, and Scott Miller, 202-
502-8456, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#562535392222783b3f3a3a3324163033243578313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f380909c8787dd9e9a9f9f9681b395968190dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>; or Christina Hayes 202-502-6194, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#30535842594344595e511e585149554370565542531e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6f647e657f7865626d22646d75697f4c6a697e6f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>; for other concerns.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11627 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1872

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act with respect to the definition of

a member business loan.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 5, 1999

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act with respect to

the definition of a member business loan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MEMBER BUSINESS LOAN EXCEPTION.

4 Section 107a(c)(1)(B) of the Federal Credit Union

5 Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a(c)(1)(B)) is amended—

6 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end;

7 (2) in clause (v), by striking the period and in8 serting ‘‘; or’’; and

9 (3) by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 1872 IS

1 ‘‘(vi) that is made to a nonprofit reli2 gious organization.’’.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2292

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to renew the authority of the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission to indemnify its licensees, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 23, 2000

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to renew the

authority of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to indemnify its licensees, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Price-Anderson

5 Amendments Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. INDEMNIFICATION OF LICENSEES.

7 Section 170c. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42

8 U.S.C. 2210(c)) is amended in the first sentence by strik9 ing ‘‘August 1, 2002’’ and inserting ‘‘August 1, 2012’’.
2

•S 2292 IS

1 SEC. 3. MAXIMUM ANNUAL DEFERRED PREMIUM.

2 Section 170b.(1) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954

3 (42 U.S.C. 2210(b)(1)) is amended by striking

4 ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,000,000’’.

5 SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

6 Section 170p.(1) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954

7 (42 U.S.C. 2210(p)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘August

8 1, 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘August 1, 2008’’.

9 SEC. 5. APPLICABILITY.

10 The amendments made by this Act apply with respect

11 to nuclear incidents occurring on or after the date of en12 actment of this Act.

Æ
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-1825

LT Case No. 2015-CF-001320-A

_____________________________

WILLIAM SANDERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County. 

Dennis Craig, Judge. 

William Sanders, Jasper, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah 

Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

May 28, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, JAY, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the“Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

 

 

Date: December 23, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11720]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee (ATMAC)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management 
Advisory Committee (ATMAC).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee (ATMAC).

DATES: The meeting will be held June 3, 2010, from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Bessie Coleman Room, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org. METRO: L'Enfant Plaza Station 
(Use 7th & Maryland Exit).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee 
meeting. The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions);
    <bullet> Trajectory Operations (TOps) Work Group Presentation of 
Document, including Recommendations, for ATMAC Discussion, Approval, 
and possible Next Steps;
    <bullet> NextGen Implementation Work Group (NGIWG) Report, 
Discussion, and possible Next Steps;
    <bullet> ADS-B Work Group Presentation of Legacy ADS-B Equipment 
Paper for ATMAC Discussion, Approval, and possible Next Steps;
    <bullet> FAA National Special Activity Airspace Program (NSAAP) 
Presentation Requested by Requirements and Planning Work Group, 
Airspace Work Group; precursor to future ATMAC Action Item;
    <bullet> ATMAC Process Improvement Ad Hoc Group Presentation of 
Recommendations for ATMAC Discussion and Approval;
    <bullet> ATMAC Membership for 2010-2011 Term;
    <bullet> Closing Plenary (Other Business, Adjourn).

    Note: Please arrive in the FAA lobby by 9:30 a.m. to allow ample 
time for security and check in procedures.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 10, 2010.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-11720 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 24 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00719

- CR

BILLY NEIL REID , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1295189

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon

. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for six years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of

appe al. We dismiss the appeal.2

The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial cou rt’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports
the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and Donovan

. Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Yossi Haras, Chief Financial Officer of B&D Food Corp., hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the
      quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B&D Food Corp. for the nine months and
      three months ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of B&D Food
      Corp.





Dated:
      November 14, 2006





/s/
      YOSSI HARAS


Yossi
      Haras


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal


Accounting
      Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to B&D Food Corp. and will be retained by
      B&D Food Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 12.1****RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**     The following table sets forth our consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each ofthe periods indicated:             **Years Ended December 31,**  **2006** **2005** **2004** **2003** **2002**Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 17.5 3.7 2.6 1.5 ** The earnings for the year ended December 31, 2002 was inadequate to cover total fixedcharges. The coverage deficiencies for the year ended December 31, 2002 was (in thousands):$70,181.     In computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings have been based on income (loss)from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist ofinterest, amortization of debt issuance costs and the portion of rental expense on operating leasesattributable to interest.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 93 (Friday, May 14, 2010)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 27163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11730]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 2010 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 27163]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2010-08 of May 10, 2010

                
Agreement Between the Government of the United 
                States of America And the Government of the Russian 
                Federation for Cooperation In the Field of Peaceful 
                Uses of Nuclear Energy

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] Secretary 
                of Energy

                I have considered the proposed Agreement Between the 
                Government of the United States of America and the 
                Government of the Russian Federation for Cooperation in 
                the Field of Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, signed in 
                Moscow on May 6, 2008, along with the views, 
                recommendations, and statements of the interested 
                departments and agencies.

                I approve the proposed Agreement and have determined 
                that the performance of the Agreement will promote, and 
                will not constitute an unreasonable risk to, the common 
                defense and security.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 10, 2010

[FR Doc. 2010-11730
Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS NAD IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997             DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                       4,310,000                  56,000
<SECURITIES>                                 9,120,000                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,118,000               8,024,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (344,000)               (403,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,549,000               9,293,000
<PP&E>                                       7,126,000               5,217,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,722,000)               (786,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,440,000              22,994,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,159,000               9,104,000
<BONDS>                                      2,549,000               6,738,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    32,312,000                 357,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (782,000)             (3,105,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,440,000              22,994,000
<SALES>                                     92,831,000              50,571,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            92,831,000              50,571,000
<CGS>                                       54,769,000              30,342,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,769,000              30,342,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            33,689,000              18,233,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             581,000                  65,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,246,000               2,365,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,737,000               1,004,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,509,000               1,361,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,509,000               1,361,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34                     .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25                     .16
        

</TABLE>