alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TWEATI'ORNEYGENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

AURTIN. ‘J%XAS 78711 

November 8, 1974 

The Honorable M. L. Brockette 

Commissioner of Education 

Texas Education Agency 

The Honorable Bevington Reed 

Commissioner of Higher Education 

Coordinating Board 

Texas College and University System 

Austin, Texas 

Opinion No. H- 446 

Re: Validity of contrac,t 

between State Board of 

Education and Coordinating 

Board for coordination of 

post-secondary technicalvocational education and 

related questions. 

You have requested our opinion concerning the authority of the State 

Board of Education and the Coordinattng Board, Texas College and 

University System, to enter into an interagency agreement regarding the 

administration of technical-vocational programs in post-secondary institutions. 

Section 61,067, Texas Education Code, specifically allows the Coordinating Board to “contract with any other state governmental agency 

~ to reduce duplication and a~ehieve better use of personnel and 

facilities. ” However the Coordinating Board “shall perform only the 

functions which are enumerated 0 0 D [by statute].” See, 61. 021,, Texas 

Education Code. 

General authority fey interagency agreements is granted by Art. 4413(32), 

V. T. C. S. s the Interagency Cooperation Act, Section 4 of this act requires 

advance approval,of the agreement or contract by the Board of Control. The 

considerations to be passed on by the BoaPd of Control are set out i.n Section 

5, which provides: 

No agreement or contract may be entered into or 

performed which wiP1 requi.re or permit an agency of 

the State to exceed its constitutional or statutory duties 

and responsibilities, or the Iimitations of its appropriated funds. In reviewing proposed agreements or 

po 2056 
The Honorable MiI. L. Brockette 

The Honorable Bevington Reed, page 2 (H-446) 

contracts of the character described in this Act, 

the Board of Control is authorized and directed 

to consider the foll.owing factors, which shall 

not be construed to be excl.usive: 

(a) Whether the services specified are 

necessary and essential for activities and work 

that are properly within the statutory f-unctions 

and programs of the affected agencies of the 

State Government: 

It is our opinion that since review of the validity of a proposed interagency agreement or contract is withi,n the statutory responsibility of 

the Board of Control, your questions concerning a particular proposal 

should be addressed initially to that office. See Attorney General Opinion 

- 

H-407 (1974). 

SUM~MARY 

Questions concerning the validity of a proposed 

interagency agreement should be submitted initially 

to the Board of Control for its determination. 

Very truly yours, 

JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General of 

h%aLM 

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman 

Texas 

Opinion Committee 

pe 2057
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 227

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to provide or support programs

to provide individuals with hypodermic needles or syringes for the use

of illegal drugs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. COVERDELL (for himself and Mr. BROWNBACK) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds to provide

or support programs to provide individuals with hypodermic needles or syringes for the use of illegal drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR HYPO4 DERMIC NEEDLES.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed6 eral funds shall be made available or used to carry out

7 or support, directly or indirectly, any program of distribut-
2

•S 227 IS

1 ing sterile hypodermic needles or syringes to individuals

2 for the hypodermic injection of any illegal drug.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                               NOVA CORPORATION
                  COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  YEAR            TEN MONTH             YEAR
                                                                                  ENDED          PERIOD ENDED           ENDED
                                                                           FEBRUARY 28, 1995   DECEMBER 31, 1995  DECEMBER 31, 1996
                                                                           -----------------   -----------------  -----------------
<S>                                                                        <C>                 <C>                <C>
Weighted average Common Stock outstanding during the period.............           1,674,607           2,645,290         26,932,029
Cheap Stock(1)..........................................................              52,061              52,061                 --
Conversion of Preferred Stock into Common Stock.........................          11,876,218          11,876,218                 --
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents.............................                  --           3,450,913          1,671,743
                                                                                 -----------         -----------        -----------
     Total..............................................................          13,602,886          18,024,482         28,603,772
                                                                                 ===========         ===========        ===========

Net income (loss).......................................................         $(1,213,000)        $ 4,887,000        $ 7,267,000
Less: Preferred Stock dividends.........................................             534,601             488,899            229,677
                                                                                 -----------         -----------        -----------

Net income available for Common Stock and common stock equivalents......         $(1,747,601)        $ 4,398,101        $ 7,037,323
                                                                                 ===========         ===========        ===========

Per share amount........................................................              $(0.13)              $0.24              $0.25
                                                                                 ===========         ===========        ===========
</TABLE>

     (1)  Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting Bulletin No.
          83, common stock and common stock equivalents issued at prices below
          the assumed initial public offering price per share ("cheap stock")
          during the twelve months immediately preceding the initial filing date
          of the Company's Registration Statement for its public offering have
          been included as outstanding for all periods presented.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-4030 and No. 333-29267 and Form S-3 No. 333-31161) pertaining
to the Heartport, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan
and the convertible subordinated notes, of our report dated January 22, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Heartport,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1998.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
March 26, 1999
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2175

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-fluoro-2-nitro benzene.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. THOMPSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-fluoro-2-nitro benzene.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.04 1-fluoro-2-nitro

benzene, of a

kind used for

raw material for

pharmaceutical

intermediate

(CAS No.

001493–27–2)

(provided for in

subheading

2904.90.30) ....... Free Free No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.
2

•S 2175 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 92 (Thursday, May 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 27010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12164 and <greek-i>12165]


Maryland Disaster <greek-i>MD-00012

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Maryland (FEMA-
1910-DR), dated 05/06/2010.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms and Snowstorms.
    Incident Period: 02/05/2010 through 02/11/2010.
    Effective Date: 05/06/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/06/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/07/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 05/06/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Allegany, Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Baltimore City, 
Calvert, Caroline, Carroll, Cecil, Charles, Dorchester, Frederick, 
Garrett, Harford, Howard, Kent, Montgomery, Prince George's, Queen 
Anne's, Saint Marys, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere..     3.625
    Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available              3.000
     Elsewhere................................................
For Economic Injury:
    Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available              3.000
     Elsewhere................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12164B 
and for economic injury is 12165B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-11409 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 15.2

GRAPHICKPMG LLP
Chartered AccountantsYonge Corporate Centre
4100 Yonge St.
Suite 200
North York, ON M2P 2H3

Telephone
Fax
Internet

(416) 228-7000
(416) 228-7123
www.kpmg.ca


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Celestica Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements onForms S-8 (Nos. 333-71126, 333-66726,
333-63112, 333-88210 and 333-113591)and on FormsF-3 (333-155390)of Celestica Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2009 (February 26, 2009 as to
note 22), with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Celestica Inc. (and subsidiaries) as at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholder's equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 and our report dated February 11, 2009 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 20-F of Celestica Inc.

GRAPHIC

Chartered
Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

Toronto,
Canada
March 13, 2009

KPMG, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadian
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1



RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Donat A. Fournier, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Beverly National Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:



a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | November 10, 2004      
|      | 
|By:   |  | /s/ Donat A. Fournier  
|      |  | Donat A. Fournier      
|      |  | Chief Executive Officer
Amendment No 5 to the Company's Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT No. 5 
 To 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 SAVVIS, INC. 
 2003 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 The
Amended and Restated SAVVIS, Inc. 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as set forth below, effective as of the date of adoption (the “Adoption Date”) of this amendment (the “Amendment”) by the
Board of Directors of SAVVIS, Inc. (the “Corporation”), subject to approval of this Amendment by the stockholders of the Corporation, as provided below: 
 1. A new Section is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows: 
 “Section 19.20. — Exchange Program

 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, including but not
limited to Section 3.3 hereof, the Company, by action of the Committee, may effect an Option exchange program on the terms set forth herein (the “Exchange Program”), to be commenced through an exchange offer prior to
December 31, 2009, provided that in no event may more than one offer to exchange be made for any outstanding Option. Under any Exchange Program, Eligible Employees will be offered the opportunity to exchange Eligible Options (the
“Surrendered Awards”) for new Options (the “New Options”), as follows: (1) the New Options shall have a value equal to the value of the Surrendered Awards (determined using a generally recognized valuation
methodology) as of the date immediately prior to the commencement of any exchange offer for the Surrendered Awards; and (2) the New Options will vest as follows: (i) New Options issued in exchange for vested Surrendered Awards shall vest
on a date that is six months from the conclusion of the exchange offer, and (ii) New Options issued in exchange for unvested Surrendered Awards shall vest over a three (3) year period with one-third ( 1/3) of the New Options vesting one year from the conclusion of any exchange offer and one-third ( 1/3) of such New Options vesting on each yearly anniversary thereof. Shares subject to Surrendered Awards will be available for
granting of Awards under the Plan. “Eligible Employees” means employees of the Company or any Affiliate. “Eligible Options” means any Option that (i) has an exercise price in excess of the 52 week high closing
price of the Stock on the commencement of the Exchange Program and (ii) was not granted within the 12 month period prior to the commencement of the Exchange Program. Subject to the foregoing, the Committee shall be permitted to determine
additional terms, restrictions or requirements relating to the Exchange Program.” 
 2. The Plan shall be unchanged in all other respects.

 3. This Amendment is adopted subject to stockholder approval. 
 * * * 
 The foregoing Amendment to the Plan was duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of the
Corporation on February 10, 2009, subject to approval of the Amendment by stockholders of the Corporation.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF :

LYLE JAMES HEAVY RUNNER,

Deceased

. DA 23

- 0199

ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FO R EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE RESPONSE BRIEF

Upon consideration of Appellee Nakoa Heavy Runner ’s Second Motion for

Extension of Time to File Response Brief

, and good cause appearing, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee shall have up to and including November 6

,

2023 to file his Response Brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 28 2023

09/28/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0199
CERTIFICATION

        In connection with the Annual Report of REII Incorporated. (the "
Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Garfield Ricketts, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date: August 6, 2004 s/s Garfield Ricketts President/Chief Executive Officer
                        ______________________________________________________
                         Garfield Ricketts, President/Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
MICHAEL L. SELF , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 22

- 0080 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR1987

- 009694 The Honorable Roy C. Whitehead , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent

Michael L. Self , Kingman Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge James B. Morse Jr., and Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court

. FILED 10-06-2022STATE v . SELF Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Michael L. Self seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief. This is petitioner’s eight h petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.