Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules 27507 

document above, CPSC has identified 58 

suppliers of hand-held hair dryers to the 

U.S. consumer market which provide 

products listed to the UL standard. 

Three large firms supply approximately 

92% of the U.S. market share. 

According to the Small Business 

Administration Size Standards, these 

three firms are not small businesses. 

According to the UL Online 

Certifications Directory and the Intertek 

ETL Listed Mark Products Directory, 

these three firms plus an additional 55 

firms are UL listed to produce 

complying hair dryers. All but one of 

these 55 firms appears to be a small 

business. Thus, the overwhelming 

majority of hair dryers sold in the 

United States are already UL listed. 

Since the majority of businesses (both 

large and small) are already in 

compliance with the voluntary 

standard, the proposed rule is not 

expected to pose a significant burden to 

small business. Therefore, the 

Commission certifies that, in accordance 

with section 605 of the RFA, the rule, 

if promulgated, will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

I. Environmental Considerations 

A rule determining that hand-held 

hair dryers without immersion 

protection in accordance with UL 859 or 

UL 1727 present a substantial product 

hazard is not expected to have an 

adverse impact on the environment and 

is considered to be a ‘‘categorical 

exclusion’’ for the purposes of the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

according to the CPSC regulations that 

cover its ‘‘environmental review’’ 

procedures (16 CFR 1021.5(c)(1)). 

J. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This proposed rule would not impose 

any information collection 

requirements. Accordingly, this rule is 

not subject to the Paperwork Reduction 

Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. 

K. Effective Date 

The proposed effective date of Part 

1120, which declares that any held-held 

hair dryer without immersion 

protection, as specified in UL 859 or UL 

1727, is a substantial product hazard, is 

30 days from issuance of any final 

regulation in the Federal Register. Thus, 

it would apply to hand-held hair dryers 

imported or introduced into commerce 

30 days or more after publication of any 

final rule in the Federal Register. 

L. Preemption 

The proposed rule would place handheld hair dryers without integral 

immersion protection on a list of 

products that present a substantial 

product hazard. The proposed rule does 

not establish a consumer product safety 

standard. The preemption provisions in 

section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 

2075(a), apply when a consumer 

product safety standard is in effect. 

Therefore, section 26(a) of the CPSA 

would not apply to this rule. 

M. Request for Comments 

The Commission invites interested 

persons to submit their comments to the 

Commission on any aspect of the 

proposed rule. Comments should be 

submitted as provided in the 

instructions in the ADDRESSES section at 

the beginning of this notice. 

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1120 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Consumer protection, 

Household appliances, Imports, 

Incorporation by reference. 

Therefore, the Commission proposes 

to amend Title 16 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations by adding part 1120 to read 

as follows: 

PART 1120—SUBSTANTIAL PRODUCT 

HAZARD LIST 

Sec. 

1120.1 Authority 

1120.2 Definitions 

1120.3 Substantial product hazard list 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2064(j). 

§ 1120.1 Authority. 

Under the authority of section 15(j) of 

the Consumer Product Safety Act 

(CPSA), the Commission determines 

that consumer products or classes of 

consumer products listed in § 1120.3 

have characteristics whose existence or 

absence presents a substantial product 

hazard under section 15(a)(2) of the 

CPSA. The Commission has determined 

that the listed products have 

characteristics that are readily 

observable and have been addressed by 

a voluntary standard, that the voluntary 

standard has been effective, and that 

there is substantial compliance with the 

voluntary standard. The listed products 

are subject to the reporting requirements 

of section 15(b) of the CPSA and to the 

recall provisions of section 15(c) and (d) 

of the CPSA, and shall be refused entry 

into the United States under section 

17(a)(4) of the CPSA. 

§ 1120.2 Definitions. 

The definitions in section 3 of the 

Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 

2052) apply to this part 1120. 

(a) Substantial product hazard means 

a product defect which (because of the 

pattern of defect, the number of 

defective products distributed in 

commerce, the severity of the risk, or 

otherwise) creates a substantial risk of 

injury to the public. 

(b) Hand-held hair dryer means an 

electrical appliance, intended to be held 

with one hand during use, which 

creates a flow of air over or through a 

self-contained heating element for the 

purpose of drying hair. 

§ 1120.3 Substantial product hazard list. 

The following products or class of 

products shall be deemed to be 

substantial product hazards under 

section 15(a)(2) of the CPSA. 

(a) Hand-held hair dryers that do not 

provide integral immersion protection 

in compliance with the requirements of 

section 5 of Underwriters Laboratories 

(UL) Standard for Safety for Household 

Electric Personal Grooming Appliances, 

UL 859–2007, 10th Edition, approved 

March 21, 2007, or section 6 of UL 

Standard for Safety for Commercial 

Electric Personal Grooming Appliances, 

UL 1727, 4th Edition, approved March 

25, 1999. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves these incorporations 

by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may 

obtain a copy from UL, Inc., 333 

Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062. 

You may inspect a copy at the Office of 

the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 

East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 

20814, telephone 301–504–7923, or at 

the National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to: http://www.archives.gov/

federal_register/code_of_federal_

regulations/ibr_locations.html. 

(b) [Reserved] 

Dated: May 11, 2010. 

Todd Stevenson, 

Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11624 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0349] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Safety Zone; Delaware River, Big 

Timber Creek, Westville, NJ 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

27508 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a temporary Safety Zone 

during the ‘‘Westville Parade of Lights,’’ 

an annual event held annually on the 

last Saturday in June with a rain date of 

the first Saturday in July. This Safety 

Zone is necessary to provide for the 

safety of life on navigable waters during 

the event. This action is intended to 

temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the 

regulated area within Big Timber Creek. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before June 16, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

XXXX–XXXX using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail Ensign Gary George, 

Coast Guard; telephone 215–271–4851, 

e-mail gary.e.george@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–XXXX–XXXX), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–XXXX–XXXX’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–XXXX– 

XXXX’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

Annually on the last Saturday of June, 

the Borough of Westville and Westville 

Power Boat will sponsor the ‘‘Parade of 

Lights.’’ There will be a boat parade 

from the Route 130 Bridge to the 

Delaware River entrance in Big Timber 

Creek along with a fireworks display 

launched from land with a fallout area 

extending over the navigable waters of 

Big Timber Creek in the vicinity of 

Westville, New Jersey. Due to the need 

for vessel control during the event, 

vessel traffic will be temporarily 

restricted to provide for the safety of 

spectators and transiting vessels. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to establish 

a safety zone on Big Timber Creek in 

Westville, NJ, encompassing all waters 

from the Route 130 Bridge to the 

entrance of the Delaware River, 

shoreline to shoreline. The safety zone 

will be in effect from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. 

on the last Saturday in June. The effect 

will be to restrict general navigation in 

the regulated area during the boat 

parade and fireworks display. Except for 

persons or vessels authorized by the 

Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no 

person or vessel may enter or remain in 

the regulated area during the 

enforcement period. The Patrol 

Commander will notify the public of 

specific enforcement times by Marine 

Radio Safety Broadcast. These 

regulations are needed to control vessel 

traffic during the event to enhance the 

safety of spectators and transiting 

vessels. 

Regulatory Evaluation 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, 

Regulatory Planning and Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules 27509 

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office 

of Management and Budget has not 

reviewed it under that Order. 

We expect the economic impact of 

this proposed rule to be so minimal that 

a full Regulatory Evaluation is 

unnecessary. 

Although this regulation restricts 

vessel traffic from transiting a portion of 

Big Timber Creek near Westville, New 

Jersey, the effect of this regulation will 

not be significant due to the limited 

duration that the regulated area will be 

in effect and the extensive advance 

notifications that will be made to the 

maritime community via marine 

information broadcasts and area 

newspapers so mariners can adjust their 

plans accordingly. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities: the owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit a portion of 

Big Timber Creek in the vicinity of 

Westville, New Jersey during the event. 

This proposed rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the following reasons. The rule will be 

in effect for only a short period, from 8 

p.m. to 11 p.m. on the last Saturday in 

June, annually. Before the enforcement 

period, we will issue maritime 

advisories so mariners can adjust their 

plans accordingly. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the address 

listed under ADDRESSES. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this proposed rule or any policy or 

action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

27510 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule 

involves the creation of a safety zone 

and is categorically excluded from 

further analysis under exemption 34(g) 

of the Instruction. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—PART 165–REGULATED 

NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED 

ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701; 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T05–0349 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T05–0349, Safety Zone; Big Timber 

Creek, Westville, New Jersey. 

(a) Regulated area: The waters of the 

Big Timber Creek in Westville Boro, 

Gloucester County, New Jersey, from the 

Route 130 Bridge to the entrance of the 

Delaware River. 

(b) Definitions: 

(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander 

means a commissioned, warrant, or 

petty officer of the Coast Guard who has 

been designated by the Commander, 

Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay. 

(2) Official Patrol means any vessel 

assigned or approved by Commander, 

Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay with 

a commissioned, warrant, or petty 

officer on board and displaying a Coast 

Guard ensign. 

(c) Safety Zone: (1) Except for persons 

or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard 

Patrol Commander, no person or vessel 

may enter or remain in the regulated 

area. 

(2) The operator of any vessel in the 

regulated area shall: 

(i) Stop the vessel immediately when 

directed to do so by any Official Patrol. 

(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official 

Patrol. 

(d) Enforcement Period. This section 

will be enforced annually from 8 p.m. 

to 11 p.m. on the last Saturday in June 

with a rain date of the first Saturday in 

July. 

Dated: April 29, 2010. 

M.L. Austin, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Sector Delaware Bay. 

[FR Doc. 2010–11655 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0157; FRL–9151–9] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; State of 

West Virginia; Section 110(a)(2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 

1997 8-Hour Ozone and the 1997 and 

2006 Fine Particulate Matter National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

submittals from the State of West 

Virginia pursuant to the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) sections 110(k)(2) and (3). These 

submittals address the infrastructure 

elements specified in the CAA section 

110(a)(2), necessary to implement, 

maintain, and enforce the 1997 8-hour 

ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 

national ambient air quality standards 

(NAAQS) and the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. 

This proposed action is limited to the 

following infrastructure elements which 

were subject to EPA’s completeness 

findings pursuant to CAA section 

110(k)(1) for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS dated March 27, 2008 and the 

1997 PM2.5 NAAQS dated October 22, 

2008: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), 

(F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), or 

portions thereof. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before June 16, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2010–0157 by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. 

• Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0157, 

Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, 

Office of Air Program Planning, 

Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. 

• Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010– 

0157. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at http:// 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS