alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RUGE, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES 

AND CROSS-APPELLANTS; NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION 

CORPORATION, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as Ruge v. Conrad (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. 

(No. 97-2328 — Submitted October 14, 1998 at the Mercer County Session — 

Decided December 30, 1998.) 

APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, No. 

97CA0015. 

__________________ 

Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jaffy and 

Eric S. Bravo, for appellant and cross-appellee. 

 Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellees and cross-appellants Administrator, 

Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, and Industrial Commission. 

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Joseph A. Brunetto, for appellee 

Navistar International Transportation Corp. 

__________________ 

 The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. 

 The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the 

Ohio Official Reports, and that it may not be cited as authority except by the 

parties inter se. 

 MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG 

STRATTON,JJ., concur. 

 COOK,J., dissents. 

__________________ 
 2

 COOK, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this 

case as improvidently allowed and, if addressing this case on the merits, would 

affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                              |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   | (2) | The                information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|   |
|   |

|                             Date:  February 14,              2006 | /s/ Barry              H. Black                                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                   | Barry H.              Black                                                     |
|                                                                                                                                                   | Vice              President of Finance and Chief Financial              Officer |
|                                                                                                                                                   |
|                                                                                                                                                   |
|                                                                                                                                                   |
|                                                                                                                                                   |
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-22-00130-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 231st District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 231-700012-21

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Wallach and Walker, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

IN THE INTEREST OF T.B., A CHILD
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Father appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to 

his child on the grounds that Father had constructively abandoned the child, had not 

regularly visited or maintained significant contact with the child, had demonstrated an 

inability to provide the child with a safe environment, and had failed to comply with 

his court-ordered service plan; the Department had made reasonable efforts to return 

the child to the father; and that termination was in the child’s best interest.1 See Tex.

Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(b)(1)(N), (O), (b)(2). We affirm.

Father’s appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief stating that the appeal

is frivolous and wholly without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 

87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967); see also In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774, 776–77 (Tex. App.—

Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) (holding that Anders procedures apply in cases terminating 

parental rights). The brief meets the Anders requirements by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be 

advanced on appeal. Further, Father’s counsel (1) provided Father with a copy of the 

Anders brief, (2) informed Father of his rights to file a pro se response and to seek 

discretionary review from the Supreme Court, and (3) advised Father of his right to 

access the appellate record and provided to him a form motion for effectuating that 

purpose. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Father 

1The child’s Mother is deceased and not a party to this appeal.
3

did not file a response, and the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services 

declined to file a brief.

When an Anders brief is filed, we must independently examine the record to 

determine if any arguable grounds for appeal exist. In re C.J., 501 S.W.3d 254, 255 

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016, pets. denied). Our examination should consider the 

record, the briefs, and any pro se response. In re L.B., No. 02-19-00407-CV, 2020 WL 

1809505, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 9, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.).

After careful review, we agree with Father’s counsel that there are no arguable 

grounds for appeal in this case. We affirm the trial court’s judgment terminating 

Father’s parental rights. Father’s counsel remains appointed in this case through any 

proceedings in the Supreme Court unless otherwise relieved of these duties. See In re 

P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016).

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker

Justice

Delivered: October 6, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26788-26789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLUTW01000-09-L14300000-ET0000-24-1A00; UTU 79765]


Public Land Order No. 7742; Withdrawal of Public Land for the 
Manning Canyon Tailings Repository; UT

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order withdraws 109.43 acres of public land from location 
and entry under the United States mining laws for a period of 5 years 
to protect the integrity of the Manning Canyon Tailings Repository and 
surrounding drainage structures while the Bureau of Land Management 
completes land use planning for the area.

DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Nelson, BLM Salt Lake Field 
Office, 2370 South 2300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119, 801-977-4355.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the withdrawal is to protect 
public health and safety and the Federal investment in the Manning 
Canyon Tailings Repository. The Bureau of Land Management intends to 
evaluate the need for a lengthier withdrawal through the land use 
planning process.

Order

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and

[[Page 26789]]

Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714, it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the land described below is 
hereby withdrawn from location and entry under the United States mining 
laws, 30 U.S.C. 22 et seq., to protect the Manning Canyon Tailings 
Repository for a period of 5 years:

Salt Lake Meridian

T. 6 S., R. 3 W.,
    Sec. 15, lots 12, 13, 14 and 17, W\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, NE\1/
4\SW\1/4\SE\1/4\, NW\1/4\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\, and that portion of Mineral 
Patent Nos. 27720, 28065, and 35708 located within the SW\1/4\NE\1/
4\, E\1/2\SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, NE\1/4\NE\1/4\SW\1/4\, and NW\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    The areas described contain 109.43 acres in Utah County.

    2. This withdrawal will expire 5 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f), the Secretary determines 
that the withdrawal shall be extended.

     Dated: April 28, 2010.
Wilma A. Lewis,
Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-11249 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000             DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                               721346                 0
<SECURITIES>                              0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0                 0
<INVENTORY>                               0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0                 0
<PP&E>                              9410815                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                      7302577                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      3054609                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0                 0
<BONDS>                                   0                 0
<COMMON>                                  0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                 0
<PREFERRED>                               0                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                0                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        3054609                 0
<SALES>                             1607293                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1612500                 0
<CGS>                                     0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      628699                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  628699                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                 0
<CHANGES>                                 0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         628699                 0
<EPS-BASIC>                             0                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0                 0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                               Press Release
 
 
 
 
COLUMBUS' FIRST FEDERAL TO MERGE WITH NBC
 
STARKVILLE - The Boards of Directors of NBC Capital Corporation and FFBS
Bancorp, Inc., the parent company for First Federal Bank for Savings,
Columbus, Mississippi, have jointly announced that they have reached an
agreement to merge the two companies whereupon NBC Capital Corporation
would be the surviving company. First Federal was originally chartered in
Columbus in 1892. 
 
NBC Capital Corporation, with approximately $780 million in assets,
currently operates 32 banking offices in East Mississippi and Tuscaloosa,
Alabama. The company earned $9.3 million in 1998 prior to its recently
concluded merger with First National Corporation of West Point. First
Federal has assets of $160 million and operates four banking offices in
Columbus and New Hope, Mississippi. The resulting entity will have assets
of approximately $940 million. 
 
Under the terms of the agreement, each share of FFBS common stock will be
exchanged for .7702 shares of NBC common stock. Based on the current market
price for NBC ($40.00), the per share value of the transaction is $30.81.
The aggregate value of the transaction, including the exercise of all stock
options, is approximately $50.6 million. The transaction will be a tax-free
exchange and accounted for as a pooling of interest. The transaction, which
is pending shareholder and regulatory approval is expected to be completed
in mid-1999.
 
"First Federal has provided quality financial service to the citizens of
Columbus and Lowndes County since 1892," stated L.F. Mallory, Jr., Chairman
and CEO of NBC Capital Corporation. "They have a well earned reputation of
offering excellent personal service to their customers and have excelled as
a retail mortgage lender in the Columbus/Lowndes County market. They are a
successful organization," said Mallory. "We look forward to our association
with them and plan to further enhance their mortgage activities as well as
provide additional financial services to their many loyal customers,"
concluded Mallory. 
 
"We are pleased to unite with NBC," stated Frank Griffin, President and CEO
of FFBS Bancorp. "We are familiar with their management and corporate
culture. They are strong financially and share our values and commitment to
customer service. We believe our union with NBC will provide our customers
with additional financial services that will be useful to them," concluded
Griffin. 
 
William McIntyre, Chairman of FFBS Bancorp shared Griffin's enthusiasm.
"NBC is a quality institution that knows this market. We look forward to
our companies coming together and the tremendous opportunity this union
represents for those served by First Federal and NBC," concluded McIntyre.
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of                Section 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934:                and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |   |                                                                                    |   |                              |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
| Signatures                              |   | Title                                                                                   |   | Date                              |
|                                    |   |                                                                                    |   |                              |
| /s/              Daniel L. Hefner       |   |                President              & Director (Principal Executive Officer) |   |  March              31, 2008 |
| Daniel                L. Hefner         |   |                                                                                    |   |                              |
|                                    |   |                                                                                    |   |                              |
|  /s/              Michael A. Freid |   |  Chief              Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer             |   |  March              31, 2008 |
| Michael                A. Freid         |   |                                                                                    |   |                              |
|                                    |   |                                                                                    |   |                              |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6877
JAMES KERR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusWILLIAM E. GUNN; J. P. HODGES; DAVID A. FASHION, JR., individually and in their respective official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge; Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-2782-2-18AJ) Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: December 15, 1997 Before HALL, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Kerr, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant filed an action seeking damages, challenging the validity of his parole rescission. To recover damages for an allegedly unconstitutional conviction or sentence, or for other harm caused by actions whoseunlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence invalid, a prisoner must prove that the conviction or sentence was: (1) reversed on direct appeal; (2) expunged by executive order; (3) declaredinvalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such a determination; or (4) called into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. See Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Because Appellant has failed to make such a showing, hisclaim is not ripe and must be dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm as modified to reflect dismissal without prejudice to Appellant's right to file another action if his claim becomes ripe. Appellant's pending motions to extend time to perfect his appeal and to quash affidavit and appeal are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
<PAGE>   1

DELOITTE &                                                      Exhibit 15.1
TOUCHE LLP
----------

              
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2500 One PPG Place                      Telephone: (412) 338-7200
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-5401     Facsimile: (412) 338-7380


November 8, 1996

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
First Western Bancorp, Inc.
New Castle, Pennsylvania 16103


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
financial information of First Western Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
periods ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, as indicated in our report dated
October 15, 1996; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996, is
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statements of First Western
Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 33-46923) for the First Western Bancorp, Inc.
401(k) Profit-Sharing and Stock Bonus Plan, on Form S-8 (No. 33-00528) for
the First Western Bancorp, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan for Key Employees
and on Form S-3 (No. 33-40596) for the First Western Bancorp, Inc. Dividend
Reinvestment and Additional Stock Purchase Plan.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the
Registration Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report
prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and
11 of that Act.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

---------------
DELOITTE TOUCHE
TOHMATSU
INTERNATIONAL
---------------
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of First McMinnville
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Charles C. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ Charles C. Jacobs
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Charles C. Jacobs
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             November 14, 2002
[File No. 1017]

#### SYLVIA MILDE, Appellant, v. RALPH E. LEIGH, Respondent.

(24 NW2d 55)

Opinion filed September 11, 1946

*Sinness*& *Duffy,*for appellant.

*Nilles, Oehlert*& *Nilles,*for respondent.

Per curiam.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to defendant’s answer. Prior to the adoption of the Revised Code of 1943, such orders were appealable. Section 7841, C. L. of 1913 specifically included an order which “sustains or overrules a demurrer” among the reviewable orders. As reenacted this section appears as § 28-2702 of the Revised Codes of 1943. The latter section omits the order overruling a demurrer from the list of reviewable orders. The omission was not inadvertently made for the notes of the Code Commission show the following:

“The provision for an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer has been omitted upon recommendation of the committee on procedure to eliminate unnecessary appeals which do not finally settle a controversy.”

It is thus clear, that the order appealed from is not appealable. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

ChuistiaNSON, Ch. J., Burke, Ntxessle, Burr and Morris, JJ., concur.