alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                            JOINT REPORTING AGREEMENT

         In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, each of the
parties hereto represents to and agrees with the other parties as follows:

         1. Such party acknowledges that it is required and eligible to file a
statement on Schedule 13G pertaining to the common stock of East Texas Financial
Services, Inc. to which this agreement is an exhibit, for the filing of the
information contained therein.

         2. Such party is responsible for timely filing of such statement and
any amendments thereto, and for the completeness and accuracy of the information
concerning such party contained therein; provided that no such party is
responsible for the completeness or accuracy of the information concerning the
other party making the filing, unless such party knows or has reason to believe
that such information is inaccurate.

         3. Such party agrees that such statement is filed by and on behalf of
each such party and that any amendment thereto will be filed on behalf of each
such party.

         This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but all of such counterparts
taken together shall constitute but one agreement.


Dated:            February 13, 2001


                                         EAST TEXAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION


                                         By: /s/ Dean Bingham
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Dean Bingham, Vice President



                                         /s/ Larry Thomas Long
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Larry Thomas Long
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 12/31/98
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,746
<PP&E>                                       1,008,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                 451,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 756,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,173
<BONDS>                                        413,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    134,789
<COMMON>                                           366
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   756,133
<SALES>                                        160,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,618
<CGS>                                           73,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               387,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (238,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (51,105)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (187,504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (187,504)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.21)
        


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1638

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to

extend the retroactive eligibility dates for financial assistance for higher

education for spouses and dependent children of Federal, State, and

local law enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24, 1999

Mr. ASHCROFT (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to extend the retroactive eligibility dates

for financial assistance for higher education for spouses

and dependent children of Federal, State, and local law

enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1638 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RETROACTIVE ELIGIBILITY

2 DATES FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR

3 HIGHER EDUCATION FOR SPOUSES AND

4 CHILDREN OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS

5 KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1216(a) of the Omnibus

7 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C.

8 3796d–5(a)) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘May 1, 1992’’, and inserting

10 ‘‘May 1, 1978,’’ ; and

11 (2) by striking ‘‘October 1, 1997,’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘October 1, 1978,’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 subsection (a) shall take effect October 1, 1999.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Developing Novel Diagnostic Tests To Improve 
Surveillance for Antimicrobial Resistant Pathogens, Funding Opportunity 
Announcement CI10-002; Initial Review

    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
April 23, 2010, Volume 75, Number 78, page 21339. The time and date, 
and place should read as follows:
Time and Date:
    12 p.m.-3 p.m., May 18, 2010 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.S., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E60, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293. The 
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated 
the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 29, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-11189 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of B&D Food Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Daniel
      Ollech, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/
                Daniel Ollech**Daniel
                Ollech**
              **Chief
                Financial Officer**




November
      19, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7669

TIMOTHY NEAL PRINCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HARVEY CLAY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:18-hc-02309-BO)

Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Neal Prince, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Neal Prince seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2018). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. 

See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Prince has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   8-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,159,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,832,576
<PP&E>                                         839,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,257,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,227,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       749,742
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,257,530
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               340,845
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                173,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,525
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   133,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132926 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132926 

 COA: 271221 

Saginaw CC: 98-016374-FC 

JONATHAN JOE JONES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

s0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TNP Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Catacosinos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ William J. Catacosinos
|William J. Catacosinos    
|Chief Executive Officer   
|August 5, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                                 AIRCRAFT LEASE

         By this Aircraft Lease TALBOTT AVIATION, INC., a Texas corporation
("Lessor"), whose address is P.O. Drawer 1416, Snyder, Texas 79550, leases to
PATTERSON (GP, LLLC) a Delaware limited liability corporation ("Lessee"), whose
address is P.O. Box 410, Snyder, Texas 79550, the aircraft described below, on
the following terms and conditions:

         1. Description of Aircraft. The property leased under this agreement is
a 1981 Beech King-Air 90 airplane, manufacturer's serial No. LA-121 and
Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration No. N182CA.

         2. Term of Lease. The term of this Lease is for a period of one (1)
year, commencing as of January 1, 2001 and terminating on December 31, 2001.

         3. Rental Payments. Lessee agrees to pay Lessor as rent for the use of
the aircraft a total sum of $9,200.00 per month, payable in advance on the first
day of each month during the term of this Lease, beginning January 1, 2001.

         Rental payments shall be made at Lessor's address as set forth above or
at any other place that may be designated by Lessor or its assignees. Any rental
payment not made by Lessee within ten (10) days of its due date shall by subject
to a late charge of five percent (5%) of the amount not paid when due for each
ten days the amount remains unpaid.

         4. Delivery of Aircraft. Lessor agrees to deliver the aircraft to
Lessee at Scurry County Airport, Snyder, Texas. At delivery to Lessee on January
1, 2001, the aircraft shall be in an airworthy condition and registered in the
name of Lessor with the Secretary of Transportation, pursuant to Section 1401,
Title 49 of the United States Code, and shall be covered by a Certificate of
Airworthiness issued by the Federal Aviation Administration.

         5. Maintenance. During the term of the Lease, Lessee shall at its own
expense maintain the aircraft, including the airframe, engines, propellers,
instruments, equipment, appliances, and accessories in fully operable condition,
and in compliance with all applicable maintenance and safety requirements of the
Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration approved
1981 Beech King-Air airplane maintenance manual (the "Maintenance Manual"). All
maintenance and repair work shall be performed by personnel duly certified to
perform such work by the Federal Aviation Administration. Work shall be in
accordance with minimum standards of the Federal Aviation Administration and in
accordance with standards set forth in the Maintenance Manual.

Dated this 20th day of December, 2000.

LESSOR:                                   LESSEE:

TALBOTT AVIATION, INC.                    PATTERSON (GP) LLC

/s/ CLOYCE A. TALBOTT                     /s/ GLENN PATTERSON
---------------------------------         --------------------------------------
CLOYCE A. TALBOTT, PRESIDENT              GLENN PATTERSON, PRESIDENT
Opinion issued December 3 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 21 - 00489 - CV

——————————— IN RE DAVID LANZER , Relat or
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPINION Relator, David Lanzer, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to transfer the underlying suit affecting the parent

- child relationship from Harris County to Montgomery County

. 1 We deny the

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of T.H.L and S.A.L., Children , cause number 2020

- 71025 , pending in the 507th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Julia Maldonado presiding.2

petition. We dismiss any pending motions, including relator’s motion for reconsideration of our denial of his request for a temporary stay, as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Landau

.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 10, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41713 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS CARRASCO-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1163-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Luis Carrasco-Castro appeals the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of illegally reentering the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Carrasco-Castro argues that his sentence should be vacated and remanded because the district court sentenced him under a mandatory Guideline scheme held unconstitutional in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The Government concedes that error occurred, but it notes that the error wasNo. 04-41713 -2- nonconstitutional in nature and argues that the error was harmless. Because Carrasco-Castro preserved his “Fanfan” challenge in the district court by raising an objection based on Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), we review for harmless error. United States v. Walters , 418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir. 2005). The Government bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the district court would not have sentenced Carrasco-Castro differently under an advisory guideline sentencing regime. See id. at 464. The instant record fails to provide clear commentary from the district court regarding whether it would have imposed the same sentence in a post- Booker environment. See id. The Government thus has not carried its burden of showing harmless

error. See id. We therefore remand Carrasco-Castro’s case for resentencing. Carrasco-Castro challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Carrasco-Castro contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),No. 04-41713 -3- cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Carrasco-Castro properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                       FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Omega Ventures Group, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, John R. Rask, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
     (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.



Date: May 12, 2006      /S/ John R. Rask
                        ------------------------------------------
                        John R. Rask, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP





The Board of Directors
Bone Care International, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-23885) on Form S-8 of Bone Care International, Inc. of our report dated
July 31, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Bone Care
International, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1998, which
report appears in the 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Bone Care
International, Inc.



KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Chicago, Illinois
September 25, 1998