alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT  31.1**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Ralph J Takala, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisreport for the period ended March 31, 2010 on Form 10-Q of AdelphiaRecovery Trust;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e))****for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,****the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

----

 
| Date: May 7, 2010 |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |   |
| /s/ Ralph J. Takala    |   |
| Ralph J. Takala        |   |
| Trustee                |   |

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BELAFONTE LOPEZ ROSIER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3047

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 21, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Collier County; Frederick R. Hardt, 

Judge.

Belafonte Lopez Rosier, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); State v. TemplarO'Brien, 173 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); State v. Burgess, 153 So. 3d 286 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2014); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Doby v. State, 25 

So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); 

Rosier v. State, 939 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (table decision); Shortridge v. 

State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 884 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 452 

So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Gary v. State, 5 So. 3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Jones 
- 2 -

v. State, 907 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2001); Sequoia v. State, 678 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
463 A.2d 31

#### Commonwealth v. Jones, Appellant.

Submitted April 13, 1983.

John J. Fioravanti, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Michael J. Kane, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before HESTER, CAVANAUGH and POPOVICH, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         356,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               356,118
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,163
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   356,118
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               199,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

I,  Stephen  A.  Romano,  certify  that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of American Ecology Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

August 12, 2003

/s/ Stephen A. Romano
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
#### Matthew Huston v. The People of the State of Illinois.

1. *Venue—In Criminal*Cases.-—Failure to prove the county in which an offense is committed is fatal to a judgment of conviction.

3. *Notice—Judicial, of*Municipalities.—Courts take judicial notice of the location of municipal corporations.

Memorandum.—Indictment under the liquor laws. Error to the Circuit Court of Henderson County; the Hon. R. Cooper, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the December term, 1893.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 22, 1894.

The opinion states the case.

Brief of Plaintiff in Error, J. H. Hanley and H. A. Boyer, Attorneys.

Failure in a criminal case to prove the county in ivhich the offense was committed is fatal to a conviction. Geo. Salter v. The People, 59 Ill. p. 68; Hugh Rice v. The People, 38 Ill. p. 436; Jacob Ferkel v. People, 16 App. 310; Jackson v. People, 40 Ill. 405.

E. U. Overman, state’s attorney, attorney for the defendant in error.

*502Mr. Presiding Justice Harker

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted upon information for selling and giving intoxicating liquor to one Henry Andrews, a person in the habit of getting intoxicated. There was a trial by jury and conviction for selling.

There was sufficient evidence to show that Anderson was in the habit of getting intoxicated and that plaintiff in error sold him whisky. The evidence does not show, however, that the sales were made in Henderson county. It shows they were made in Media, Illinois, the place at which plaintiff in error was doing business, and counsel for the State insists that upon the authority of Sullivan v. The People, 114 Ill. 28, and Sullivan v. The People, 122-387, the venue was sufficiently proven.

In the cases cited, the Supreme Court held in the first, that proof that the offense was committed in Peoria, was sufficient, because Peoria is in Peoria county, and in the second, that proof that the crime was committed in Chicago was proof that it was committed in Cook county. Chicago and Peoria are incorporated cities and their location in their respective counties presumed. So we think proof of the commission of an offense in any incorporated city or village would be sufficient proof of its commission in the county where the incorporated city or village is located. Courts take judicial notice of the location of municipal corporations.

There is no incorporated city or village in Henderson county named Media. We can not presume that a collection of houses called by that name is located within the boundaries of Henderson county. 1 Greenl. Ev., Sec. 6, and notes thereto.

For the reason that the venue was not proven, the judgment of conviction will be reversed and the cause remanded.
1 ... T h i s proc ee di n g ar i s es out of Cau s e N o. 2009- CR

- 6566 , s t y l ed S t a t e v . Ja so n M i ea rs , p e n d ing in the 3 7 9 th Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas , t he H o no rable Ro n R angel presi d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No

. 04 -0 9- 00 78 5- CR IN RE J ason M IEA RS Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Dece mber 16, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On Dec ember

8, 2009, relator J ason Miear s filed a pe tition for writ of mandamus a nd a motion for temporar

y relief . The c ourt has considere d rela tor’s petition for wr it of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief soug ht. Accor dingly , the petition for wr it of mandamus, the mot ion for temporary relief , and all other relief

reque sted is DENI ED. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). P E R C U R I A M DO NO T PU B L I SH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,271,500
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,341,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,271,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,341,039
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (2,788,232)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,788,232
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,788,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,788,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    72.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    72.06
        

</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Stephen Wulff, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00070

- CV v.

Jeff Fratangelo, Appellee Appeal from the 276th District Court of
Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

0900107 ). Opinion delivered by Justice
Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice
Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Stephen Wulff , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 1 6 , 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey, C lerk
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-5166

ALEX W. CHERBANAEFF and

ANN CHERBANAEFF,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Jeffrey D. Moffatt , Law Offices of Jeffrey D. Moffa tt, of Lancaster, California,

argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Kathleen E. Lyon , Attorney, Appellate Section, Tax Division, United States

Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for def endant-appellee. With her on

the brief were Nathan J. Hochman , Assistant Attorney General; and Bruce R. Ellisen

, Attorney.

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims

Judge Nancy B. FirestoneNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-5166

ALEX W. CHERBANAEFF and

ANN CHERBANAEFF,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Federal Claims

in CASE NO(S). 06-CV-0640

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED November 26, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-115623 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-63361 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-69321 on Form S-3 of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation of our report dated March 3,2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveincome, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation. 

/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. 

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 27, 2009
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have
issued our reports dated February 24, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements (which report expressed an unqualified opinion
and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes,”) and internal control over financial reporting included in the
Annual Report of Metropolitan Health Networks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Metropolitan Health
Networks, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-122976, effective February 24, 2005
and File No. 333-152777, effective August 5, 2008).




/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP





Miami,
Florida


February
24, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick C. Barry,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Patrick C. Barry
-----------------------
Patrick C. Barry
Chief Financial Officer


March 29, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,919
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          40,286
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   136
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    204,365
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          30,822
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            32,492
<LOANS>                                        602,667
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 945,917
<DEPOSITS>                                     756,935
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,438
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,597
<LONG-TERM>                                     44,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,213
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 945,917
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 38,935
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,166
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,009
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                50,110
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,327
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,068
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           27,042
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,729
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  37
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 25,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,578
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,600
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.11
<LOANS-NON>                                        596
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,880
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    27
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,572
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,329
<RECOVERIES>                                       818
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,790
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,729
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>