alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 190 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 190

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 
Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to 
 travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent 
 as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such 
                               aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 
Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to 
 travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent 
 as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such 
                               aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRAVEL ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT OF CERTAIN DISABLED FORMER 
              MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding after section 1060a the following new section:
``Sec. 1060b. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former 
              members of the armed forces
    ``The Secretary of Defense shall permit any former member of the 
armed forces who is entitled to compensation under the laws 
administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a service-
connected disability rated as total to travel, in the same manner and 
to the same extent as retired members of the armed forces, on 
unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and 
on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Military Airlift Command. 
The Secretary of Defense shall permit such travel on a space-available 
basis.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 
1060a the following new item:

``1060b. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former members 
                            of the armed forces.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2157-188]

On October 14, 2009, the Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington (District), on behalf of itself, the city of Everett, the city of Sultan, Tulalip Tribe, American Whitewater, and six State and Federal agencies, filed a comprehensive settlement agreement (Settlement) and Joint Explanatory Statement for the relicensing of the Jackson Hydroelectric Project. On May 5, 2010, staff issued a draft environmental assessment analyzing the terms and conditions of the Settlement.

Commission staff will hold a technical conference to discuss the proposed license articles submitted by the District as part of its Settlement and the Commission's draft environmental assessment.

The technical conference will be held on Tuesday, June 8, 2010, beginning at 9 a.m. (PST). The technical conference will be held at the District's Electric Building Headquarters located at 2320 California Street, Everett, Washington.

                    For further information, contact David Turner at (202) 502-6091, or by e-mail at                     *david.turner@ferc.gov*.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-11235 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                              821
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       521
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (65)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,395
<PP&E>                                            1,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (1,117)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,923
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             89
<OTHER-SE>                                        1,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7,589
<SALES>                                           4,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4,787
<CGS>                                             2,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (8,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (8,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (8,637)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (1.05)
                                              

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CuraGen
Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Timothy M. Shannon, M.D., President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Sean A. Cassidy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ TIMOTHY M. SHANNON, M.D.              
|Dated: June 19, 2009 |  |  |  | Timothy M. Shannon, M.D.                  
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ SEAN A. CASSIDY                       
|Dated: June 19, 2009 |  |  |  | Sean A. Cassidy                           
|                     |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATE
OF QUALIFICATIONS**
 **AND
INDEPENDENCE OF DR. NIMR ARAB**
 
 
 ►
    BSC
      Honors in Geology and MSC in Applied Geophysics from Birmingham
      University
 
 ►
    PHD
      in Applied Geophysics from Leicester University in the
  U.K.
 
 ►
    30
      years of experience in the petroleum and natural gas industry with a
      specialization in exploration processes and
technology
 
 ►
    Executive
      positions with the Syrian Petroleum Company in Syria and with the Ministry
      of Petroleum and Mineral Resources in Saudi
Arabia
 
 ►
    Previous
      Exploration Manager for Shell Syria (until September,
  2003)
 
 ►
    Member
      of various Syrian and international institutes and technical
      societies
 
 ►
    Currently
      an independent consultant in the oil and gas
sector
 
 
 Dr.
Arab has been retained by NXT to review the results of a survey conducted
utilizing stress field detection technology in Syria during 2004.
 
 
 
 
 */s/
Dr. Nimr Arab*
 Dr.
Nimr Arab
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Metropolitan Health Networks,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
M. Earley, Chief Executive Officer of Metropolitan, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)    the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)    the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Metropolitan.
 
 ****Date: March
      22, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Michael M.
      EarleyMichael M. EarleyChief Executive Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-85,039-01

EX P ARTE ANDRE DJUN A HUBERT, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W11-60671-M (A) IN THE 194T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s co n v i cted of murder and sentenc ed to forty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant filed his h ab ea s application in the trial court on October 15, 2015, and the trial court enter ed a timely order desig nating issues on November 12, 2015. The desig nated issues have not been resolved. The district cler k corr ectly forwa

rded the habea s application to this Court. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). W e remand t he habeas application to allow the trial judg e to complete an evide ntiary

investiga tion, resolve the disputed issues, and e nter finding s.2

This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolv ed wi t h i n 9 0 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the t rial court’s finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be f orwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order

. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: June 29, 2016 Do not publish
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-14348

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cv-00392-RV-EMT

BARBARA ANN KELLY, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT DAVIS,

SEASIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP,

SEASIDE COMMUNITY REALTY INC,

SEASIDE I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC,

TOWN COUNCIL INC,

 Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(July 12, 2021)

Before LAGOA, BRASHER, and ED CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

USCA11 Case: 17-14348 Date Filed: 07/12/2021 Page: 1 of 3
2

Barbara Ann Kelly appeals the district court’s judgment awarding attorney’s 

fees to Seaside Community Development Corporation. She challenges the court’s 

determination of her citizenship for diversity jurisdiction purposes and its award of 

sanctions to Seaside based on Kelly’s lying about her state citizenship. We affirm

in all respects for the reasons explained by the district court. See Doc. 362; Doc. 

368; Doc. 406. Kelly’s contentions and arguments, including any not addressed by 

the district court, are so lacking in merit that they do not warrant or deserve any 

discussion. See, e.g., United States v. Iriele, 977 F.3d 1155, 1165 n.6 (11th Cir. 

2020). By all appearances Kelly has disrespected and abused the legal system at 

every stage of this decade-long litigation, and we decline to continue indulging her 

waste of judicial resources. 

Kelly’s appeal may well be frivolous and deserving of additional sanctions

and an award to Seaside of “just damages” and “double costs,” see Fed. R. App. P. 

38, but to avoid spending even more judicial resources we will not order her to 

show cause why she should not be sanctioned. At least, we will not do that yet. 

Further efforts to challenge the district court’s rulings, and this Court’s judgment,

may not be met with similar leniency. See generally, e.g., United States v. Morse, 

532 F.3d 1130, 1133 (11th Cir. 2008) (sanctioning a pro se litigant and reasoning 

that “[b]ecause [his] arguments are frivolous and he had been warned about raising 

them, we conclude that [Rule 38] sanctions are appropriate”); see also Kelly v. 

USCA11 Case: 17-14348 Date Filed: 07/12/2021 Page: 2 of 3
3

Davis, 679 F. App’x 978 (11th Cir. 2017) (unpublished) (noting in Kelly’s last 

appeal that her “lawsuit in this case borders on frivolous, if it does not cross that 

border”).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and all pending motions are 

DENIED.

USCA11 Case: 17-14348 Date Filed: 07/12/2021 Page: 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of
XG Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DATE: December 10, 2018



| | By:/s/ Philip L. Rose                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Philip L. Rose                                                     
| | Titles: Chief Executive Officer, Presidentand Principal Executive Officer



| | By: /s/ Jacqueline Lemke                                                                              
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Jacqueline Lemke
        Titles: Chief Financial Officer and
        Principal Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LEO MARTINEZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 106

- C R

Appeal from the

409 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20120D 0 1991 )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with

the trial court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall

prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no

later than July 28 , 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13 th day of June , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
(April 27, 1901.)

#### TANNAHILL v. BLACK.

[65 Pac. 1113.]

This ease was submitted with that *Ponting v. Isaman,*ante, p. 577, 65 Pae. 434, and same decision rendered as in that case.

E. O’Neill and Miles S. Johnson, for Appellant.

Brief in *Ponting v. Isaman*applies to this case.

Benjamin F. Tweedy and James *W.*Reid, for Respondent.

Same brief as in case of *Ponting v. Isaman.*

SULLIVAN, J.

The above-entitled case was submitted with that of *Ponting v. Isaman,*ante, p. 577, 65 Pac. 434, and the decision in this case was to follow the decision in that. It is therefore ordered that the judgment be reversed, and that the cause be remanded, with instructions to the lower court to set aside said judgment and to enter judgment in favor of the appellant, dismissing this proceeding. Costs of this appeal are awarded to the appellant.

Stockslager, J., concurs.

QUARLES, C. J.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion prepared by me in *Ponting v. Isaman,*ante, p. 577, 65 Pac. 434, I dissent from the conclusion reached in this case. One feature appears in this case which does not exist in the Isaman case, and that is the fact that the appellant in this ease charged his expenses and six dollars *per diem*for time spent in going from his home to the county site and returning. This fact, to my mind, is contrary to the conclusion that “he honestly believed” that he was entitled to the fees that he charged and collected. The judgment in this case should be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 10, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ F. William Conner
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Name:                 |  | F. William Conner      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2172 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2172

          To suspend temporarily the duty on thionyl chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

 Mr. Thompson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on thionyl chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THIONYL CHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.28.01    Thionyl chloride  Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     (CAS No. 007719-                                                        31/2002          ''
                     09-7) (provided                                                                           .
                     for in
                     subheading
                     2812.10.50)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-23-00350-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 467th District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-10967-16

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

IN THE INTEREST OF D.B. AND G.B., CHILDREN
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 25, 2023, we received a document from Appellant T.B. 

(Mother) entitled “Notice of Appeal Pursuant to Provisions of §[ ]201.015, Texas 

Family Code.” See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 201.015 (authorizing de novo hearing 

before the referring court of certain rulings made by an associate judge). On 

September 27, 2023, we sent the parties a letter informing them that we had received a 

copy of Mother’s notice of appeal in this case but that it appeared that the notice of 

appeal was premature because the trial court judge had not signed an order. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.1(a), 27.1(a). We allowed the parties a reasonable time to correct the 

defect in the record, giving them until October 17, 2023, to furnish us with a signed 

copy of the order that Mother seeks to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3, 44.4(a)(2). 

We stated that if no order was signed and furnished to us by that date, then this 

appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 

43.2(f).

The deadline has passed, and we have not received a signed copy of a final 

judgment or appealable order. We thus dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 

195, 200 (Tex. 2001) (holding that, generally, appeals may be taken only from final 

judgments or interlocutory orders authorized by statute).
3

/s/ Dana Womack

Dana Womack

Justice

Delivered: November 30, 2023