alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Th e Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judg e 1 

### for the District of Nebraska. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 95-1480

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Long Son Nguyen, * * [Unpublished] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 18, 1997 Filed: March 24, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Long Son Nguyen appeals the 36-month sentence imposed by the di strict court after he pleaded guilty to counterfeit-credit-card offenses .

1 Statinghe found no reversible error, counsel filed a brief pursuant t o Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and was granted leave t o withdraw. Nguyen was given an opportunity to file a supplemental brief, but did not do so. O ur review of the record has revealed no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6273
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WALTER LOUIS INGRAM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior District Judge. (1:92-cr-00116-HNM-1) Submitted: April 20, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006 Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Louis Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Walter Louis Ingram appeals a district court’s order denying his motion for resentencing and to correct erroneous information in the presentence investigation report. The district court was without jurisdiction to do either. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED PAUL EMMANUEL KNIGHT,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D 18
- 1058 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed June 12, 2018 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County , Leticia J. Marques , Judge. Paul E mmanuel Knight, Lake City, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Perry v. State, 637 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

ORFINGER , BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | The Report fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   | (2) | The information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|   |
|   |

|                     Date:  February      13, 2008 | /s/ Owen      Farren                                                        |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                              | Owen      Farren                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                                                                                                                              | Director,      President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|                                                                                                                              |
|                                                                                                                              |
|                                                                                                                              |
|                                                                                                                              |
EXHIBIT
23

INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS CONSENT

Board
of Directors
Global Med Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary:

We consent to
the incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements (No.  333-28155, No.
333-39193, No. 333-45031, No. 333-69851, No. 333-60672, and No. 333-60674) on Form S-8 of
Global  Med Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary, of our report  dated February 4, 2005
appearing in the Annual Report on  Form 10-K of Global Med  Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

/s/
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PCEhrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman
PC

Denver,
ColoradoMarch 3, 2005

---
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2147

To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to allow duty drawback

for grape juice concentrates made from Concord or Niagara grapes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to allow

duty drawback for grape juice concentrates made from

Concord or Niagara grapes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUBSTITUTION OF CONCORD OR NIAGARA

4 GRAPE JUICE CONCENTRATES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 313 of the Tariff Act of

6 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following:

8 ‘‘(x) GRAPE JUICE CONCENTRATES.—Any grape

9 juice concentrate of degrees brix 68–70 that is made from

10 Concord or Niagara grapes shall be considered as ‘of the
2

•S 2147 IS

1 same kind and quality’ as any other grape juice con2 centrate of degrees brix 68–70, for purposes of subsection

3 (b) of this section, regardless of color, variety, or any other

4 characteristic.’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment

7 of this Act, and shall apply to any drawback claim filed

8 on or after such date.

Æ
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11380 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RAUL GARATE

- VELARDE, also known as Marco Antonio Sanchez

- Velarde , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 12

- 1

Before SMITH , CLEMENT , and COSTA , Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Raul Garate

- Velarde has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garate

- Velarde h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 20 , 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11380 Document: 00514039773 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017No. 16

- 11380

2 Accordingly, counsel ’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-11380 Document: 00514039773 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017
II

Calendar No. 324

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1730

[Report No. 106–190]

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide that certain

environmental reports shall continue to be required to be submitted.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 14, 1999

Mr. CHAFEE, from the Committee on Environment and Public Works, reported the following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the

calendar

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide that certain environmental reports shall continue

to be required to be submitted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN

4 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS.

5 (a) WATER QUALITY INVENTORY.—Section 305(b) of

6 the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.

7 1315(b)) is amended—
2

•S 1730 PCS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Each’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public

3 Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734),

4 each’’; and

5 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘The’’ and in6 serting ‘‘Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public

7 Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734),

8 the’’.

9 (b) CLEAN WATER NEEDS SURVEY.—Section 516 of

10 the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1375)

11 is amended by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘Notwith12 standing section 3003 of Public Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C.

13 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734), the’’.

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section take effect on the earlier of—

16 (1) the date of enactment of this Act; or

17 (2) December 19, 1999.

Calendar No. 324

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1730

[Report No. 106–190]

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

to provide that certain environmental reportsshall continue to be required to be submitted.

OCTOBER 14, 1999

Read twice and placed on the calendar
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                          
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000743241
<NAME> REII INCORPORATED
(FORMERLY BAP ACQUISITION CORP)
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                12,937
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          1,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     329,107
<PP&E>                                               230,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       329,107  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               4,655
<OTHER-SE>                                           336,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         329,107
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      64,138
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         50,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      19,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (5,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              404
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (5,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
                                                          







</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; ITVC Member Conflicts.                    

*Date:*                         June 11, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Enid Light, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6132, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892–9608, 301–443–0322,                    

*elight@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 4, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010–11044 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 197 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 197

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to direct the Secretary 
    of the Interior to cease mineral leasing activity on the outer 
   Continental Shelf seaward of a coastal State that has declared a 
moratorium on mineral exploration, development, or production activity 
                            in State water.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to direct the Secretary 
    of the Interior to cease mineral leasing activity on the outer 
   Continental Shelf seaward of a coastal State that has declared a 
moratorium on mineral exploration, development, or production activity 
                            in State water.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coastal States Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE MORATORIA ON OFFSHORE MINERAL LEASING.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p) State Moratoria.--When there is in effect with respect to 
land beneath navigable water (as defined in section 2 of the Submerged 
Lands Act (16 U.S.C. 1301)) of a coastal State a moratorium on oil, 
gas, or other mineral exploration, development, or production activity 
established by statute or by order of the Governor, the Secretary shall 
not issue a lease for the exploration, development, or production of 
minerals on the outer Continental Shelf that is seaward of or adjacent 
to that land.''.
                                 <all>
```
HLD

- 008 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 22

- 3410

___________ IN RE: JOSE ESTRADA,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Related to E.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2

- 12

- cr - 00581

- 001)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

March 9 , 2023 Before: Chief Jud ge CHAGARES, HARDIMAN, and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed May 10, 2023 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Jose Estrada, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus compelling the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to adjudicate his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). While this petition was pending before us, the District Court denied Estrada’s motion. In light of the District Court’s action, Estrada’s mandamus petition no longer presents a live

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

controversy. Accordingly, we will dismiss the petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

– 99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plain tiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RICH REALTY, INC., and § CARSON M. GRAY § § No. 241, 2014 Plaintiffs Below- § Appellants, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware in and v. § for New Castle County § MEYERSON & O’NEILL, § SHELSBY & LEONI, P.A., § JACK MEYERSON and § GILBERT F. SHELSBY § C.A. No. N13C06270 § Defendants Below- § Appellees. §

Submitted: October 22, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014

Before STRINE , Chief Justice, HOLLAND and RIDGELY , Justices.

O R D E R

On this 23 rd day of October 2014, after careful consideration o f the parties’

briefs, we find that the Superior Court’s judgment should be affirmed on the basis

of its well-reasoned Opinion, dated April 14, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely
Justice
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DARREN CRENSHAW AND ALLEN J. CRENSHAW,

Claimants-Appellants,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-7134

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 12-3419, Judge Margaret C. 

Bartley.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

 Upon consideration of Darren Crenshaw and Allen J. 

Crenshaw’s unopposed motion to withdraw their appeal,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted. 

The appeal is dismissed.

Case: 13-7134 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 12/19/2013
2 CRENSHAW v. SHINSEKI

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 19, 2013

Case: 13-7134 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 12/19/2013
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

Fourth Amendment to the Co-Executive Chairman Compensation Plan

 

 

This Fourth Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Co-Executive Chairman Compensation Plan between National Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Robert B. Fagenson (the “Executive”), dated June 20, 2013, including the Annexes thereto, and as amended on June 6, 2014, October 31, 2014 and October 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), is entered into and effective on the 29th day of December, 2015.

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

 

1.     The Term of the Agreement shall end on March 31, 2016. 

 

2.     The Term of the Agreement shall be extended for successive 30 day periods (“Additional Period”) after March 31, 2016 unless one of the parties to the Agreement, at least five days prior to the end of the then current Additional Period, advises the other party that he or it, as the case may be, no longer wishes to extend the Term of the Agreement. 

 

3.     Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 

This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth below.

 

	
 
	
NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION

 

 

 

/s/ Mark Goldwasser
By: Mark Goldwasser
Its: President
Date: December 29, 2015

 

EXECUTIVE

 

 

 

/s/ Robert B. Fagenson
By: Robert B. Fagenson
Date: December 29, 2015