alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**REPORT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**











The
      Board
      of Directors and Stockholders


Mexican
      Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries:








We
      have
      audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Mexican Restaurants,
      Inc.
      and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 1, 2006, and the related
      consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows
      for
      the year ended January 1, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are
      the
      responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
      an
      opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
      audit.





We
      conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
      Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require
      that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
      the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
      audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
      and
      disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
      assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
      management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement
      presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
      opinion.





In
      our
      opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
      in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Mexican
      Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2006, and the consolidated
      results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended January
      1,
      2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
      States of America.












UHY
      MANN
      FRANKFORT STEIN & LIPP CPAs, LLP








Houston,
      Texas


March
      27,
      2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited September 30, 1998 consolidated financial statements of Community
Bancorp, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        16461548
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              21800000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   34959866
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        82436409
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          82513295
<LOANS>                                      138950615
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3066705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               299735596
<DEPOSITS>                                   250011299
<SHORT-TERM>                                  23291291
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1501688
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7998045
<OTHER-SE>                                    16933273
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               299735596
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                9862947
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4576449
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                881449
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              15320845
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4996615
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5767733
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          9553112
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                7391545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4584414
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     4584414
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2896589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .986
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .986
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.94
<LOANS-NON>                                     742363
<LOANS-PAST>                                     13457
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3215559
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   171080
<RECOVERIES>                                     22226
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3066705
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1604026
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1462679
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS**In connection with the Annual Report of StarTek, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned individual, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.        Date: February 29, 2008 /s/ A. LAURENCE JONES   A. Laurence Jones   Chief Executive Officer and President      Date: February 29, 2008 /s/ DAVID G. DURHAM   David G. Durham   Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, and Treasurer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.28

October 1, 1999

David Rentz
Managing Member
Columbia Managing Partners, LLC
9750 Miramar Road
Suite 261
San Diego, CA  92126


Re:      Corporate Development Consulting and Advisory Services

Dear Mr. Rentz:

This  letter  sets  forth  the  agreement  between  PHYMED,   INC,  an  Oklahoma
Corporation,  and Columbia Managing Partners, a Nevada LLC ("Consultant"),  with
respect to certain consulting and advisory services to be provided by Consultant
to the  Company  from time to time.  Consultant  hereby  agrees to  provide  the
Company  from  time to time  throughout  the term of this  agreement,  corporate
development  services,  including  strategic  planning,  optimization of capital
structure,  access to capital  markets,  and such other similar  services as the
Company may require from time to time.

Consultant shall be paid a "Consulting Fee" for the consulting  services provide
under this Letter of Agreement.  Said  Consulting  Fee shall be in the amount of
$300,000 and paid on the fifteenth (15th) of the month commencing with the month
of October 1999.

Consultant shall not be entitled to any transaction fees. A "Transaction Fee" is
defined as a fee paid for each completed acquisition or capital placement by the
Company brought by the Consultant  during the term of this  agreement,  based on
the total amount paid by the acquiring party or the total capital raised.

In addition to the Consulting Fee, Consultant is to be reimbursed by the Company
for  out-of-pocket  expenses  ("Expenses")  incurred for such matters as travel,
printing and  reproduction,  outside  computer time charges,  postage,  delivery
services,   facsimiles,   outside  expert  and  consultant  fees,  long-distance
telephone charges, local transportation and the like. Outstanding  disbursements
will be  indemnified  and billed  separately or upon billing for  consulting and
advisory services.

Consultant  reserves the right to charge  interest at the rate of 1.5% per month
from the invoice date if invoices are not paid within 30 days.

The term of this  agreement  shall be three years  commencing on October 1, 1999
and shall terminate on September 30, 2002.

This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Texas, without giving effect to its conflicts of laws principles.

No provision of this  agreement  may be modified,  amended or waived except by a
writing signed by each party hereto.


<PAGE>


         The  undersigned  have  caused  this  letter  to be duly  executed  and
delivered, intending to be bound by the terms and conditions hereof.

Consultant:



By:     /s/ David Rentz
      --------------------------------
      David Rentz

PHYMED, INC.:


By:     /s/ George C. Barker
      --------------------------------
      George C. Barker, President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0168

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KEVIN BRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2022

10/05/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0168
Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
NetObjects, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-79669) on Form S-8 of NetObjects, Inc. of our report dated October 22, 1999,
relating to the balance sheet of Sitematic Corporation as of September 30, 1999,
and the related statements of operations,  stockholders' deficit, and cash flows
for the year then ended,  which report  appears in the September 30, 1999 annual
report on Form 10-K of NetObjects.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


San Diego, California
December 20, 1999
#### Wadsworth Stone & Paving Co. v. Whalin.

(Decided April 13, 1911.)

Appeal from Edmonson Circuit Court.

An appeal will be dismissed with damages when the judgment was superseded and the record was not filed in time, though a new trial was subsequently granted by the circuit court in an action for that purpose.

JOHN A. LOGAN and GRIDER *&*HARLAN for appellant.

LOGAN & HAZELIP for appellee.

Opinion of the CouRt by

Chief Justice Hobson.

At the June Term 1910 of the circuit court judgment was entered in favor of appellees. Appellant appealed and superseded the judgment, but did not file the record in this court within the time allowed. It filed an action for new trial in the circuit court and in that action after the time had expired for fifing the transcript, a new trial was granted and the judgment in favor of appellee was set aside. Appellee has entered a motion to dismiss the appeal with damages. The motion must be sustained. The supersedeas suspended the judgment and prevented appellee from collecting it. When the time for fifing the record expired appellee was entitled to have it dismissed with damages and this vested right is not affected by the subsequent granting of a new trial by the circuit court in the action brought for that purpose.

Appeal dismissed with damages.
II

Calendar No. 338

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1713

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend for an additional

2 years the period for admission of an alien as a nonimmigrant under

section 101(a)(15)(S) of such Act, and to authorize appropriations for

the refugee assistance program under chapter 2 of title IV of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 8, 1999

Mr. ABRAHAM (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 21, 1999

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend

for an additional 2 years the period for admission of

an alien as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(S)

of such Act, and to authorize appropriations for the

refugee assistance program under chapter 2 of title IV

of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1713 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘S Visa and Refugee

3 Assistance Authorization Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

5 In light of the increasing problem of alien smuggling

6 into the United States, it is the sense of the Congress that

7 the Attorney General should use the provision of non8 immigrant status under section 101(a)(15)(S) of the Im9 migration and Nationality Act in a greater number of

10 alien smuggling investigations per year than has been

11 done in the past.

12 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR ADMISSION

13 OF ‘‘S’’ VISA NONIMMIGRANTS.

14 Section 214(k)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality

15 Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(k)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘5’’ and

16 inserting ‘‘7’’.

17 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR REF18 UGEE ASSISTANCE.

19 Section 414(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

20 Act (8 U.S.C. 1524(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘1998 and

21 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘2000 through 2002’’.

Calendar No. 338

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1713

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to

extend for an additional 2 years the period foradmission of an alien as a nonimmigrant undersection 101(a)(15)(S) of such Act, and to authorize appropriations for the refugee assistance program under chapter 2 of title IV of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

OCTOBER 21, 1999

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned,  Yossi Haras, Chief Financial Officer of B&D Food Corp., hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B&D Food Corp. for the three months
      ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of B&D Food
      Corp.

Dated: May 15. 2006

                                 /s/ YOSSI HARAS
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Yossi Haras
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
                                 Accounting Officer)

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required  by  Section  906,  has been  provided  to B&D Food  Corp.  and will be
retained  by B&D  Food  Corp.  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit  31.1


I,  Stephen  A.  Romano,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form 10-Q of American Ecology
Corporation;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are  responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant and have:
a)  designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;
b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by  this  quarterly  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and
c)  disclosed  in  this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred during the registrant's most
recent  fiscal  quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):
a)  all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or
operation  of  internal  control  over  financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  financial  information;  and
b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting.

April 30, 2004

/S/ Stephen A. Romano
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 30 2000

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

DARREN E. PERKINS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL A. NELSON, Warden, El Dorado

Correctional Facility; BUTLER COUNTY

DISTRICT COURT; SEDGWICK COUNTY

DISTRICT COURT; DEBRA A. PETERSON,

District Attorney,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-3182

(D. Kan.)

(D.Ct. No. 00-CV-3039-DES)

____________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, KELLY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Appellant Darren Eugene Perkins, a state inmate appearing pro se, appeals

the district court’s decision denying his habeas petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. In denying the petition, the district court found Mr. Perkins’ claims

inappropriate for federal habeas corpus review because he challenged only the

application of state law in calculating his sentence.

On appeal, Mr. Perkins raises the same issue addressed by the district court. 

Specifically, he alleges the state trial court improperly computed his sentence

under provisions of the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act, Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 21-

4701 to 4728.

“In conducting habeas review, a federal court is limited to deciding whether

a conviction violated the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States.” 

Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 68 (1991). “Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 does

not lie for errors of state law.” Richmond v. Embry, 122 F.3d 866, 870 (10th Cir.

1997) (denying consideration of petitioner’s claims based on violations of state

law.).

A review of the record establishes Mr. Perkins’ claims of error are

premised on alleged violations of state sentencing laws. Therefore, his claims are
-3-

not actionable under § 2254 and do not demonstrate a substantial showing of the

denial of a federal constitutional right, as required under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Accordingly, we deny Mr. Perkins’ request for a certificate of appealability

and DISMISS his appeal.

Entered by the Court:

WADE BRORBY

United States Circuit Judge
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**





CONSENT
      OF FORMER INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (File No. 333-122976) of our report, dated March
      11,
      2006, except for the 2005 information presented in Schedule I, as to which
      the
      date is March 22, 2007 ,
      which
      appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of Metropolitan Health Networks,
      Inc.
      for the year ended December 31, 2007.





/s/
                KAUFMAN, ROSSIN & CO., P.A.




Miami,
      Florida


March
      3,
      2008
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Peoples-Sidney Financial Corporation
(the "Corporation") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification
(the "Report"), I, Douglas Stewart, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Corporation.


/s/ Douglas Stewart
------------------------------
Douglas Stewart, President and
Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 26, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Peoples-Sidney Financial
Corporation and will be retained by Peoples-Sidney Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             48.