alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BURGER v. SINCLAIR.

(140 N. W. 246.)

Opinion filed February 10, 1913.

Rehearing denied March 5, 1913.

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Coffey, J.

Action to recover damages for the destruction of property in a fire alleged to have been started and allowed to escape through the negligence of the defendant. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Affirmed upon condition.

*Knauf &*Knauf, for appellant.

*S. E.*Ellsworth, and *Carr & Kneeland,*for respondent.

Pee Cueiam.

The points of law raised in this case are substantially those which are raised in the case of Seckerson v. Sinclair, post, 625, 140 N. W. 239, and the case of Hawkins v. Sinclair, ante, 623, 140 N. W. 246, and the facts are the same with the exception of those which relate to the damages sustained. The three actions, in fact, were consolidated upon the trial, and substantially the same rulings were made in each. The same error in regard to the allowance of damages was made in this case as in the others.

The plaintiff therefore, at his option, may apply to the distinct court within thirty days from the handing down of the remittitur herein, and have the judgment modified by entering a judgment for the sum of $522.02, with costs and disbursements, and interest thereon from the date of the verdict, but from the date of the verdict alone. Otherwise a new trial will be granted. Each party will pay his own costs and disbursements upon this appeal.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amistar Corporation ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Stuart C. Baker
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows of the Company.

Dated:  May 5, 2004                     By: /s/ Stuart C. Baker
                                            --------------------------
                                            Name: Stuart C. Baker
                                            Title: President

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amistar Corporation ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Gregory D. Leiser
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows of the Company.

Dated:  May 5, 2004                     By: /s/ Gregory D. Leiser
                                            --------------------------
                                            Name: Gregory D. Leiser
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
SCWC-18-0000599

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

STATE OF HAWAI‘I,

Respondent and Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

SUSAN E. SHAW,

Petitioner and Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000599; 1CPC-17-0001118)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Nakasone, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Petitioner and Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, Susan 

E. Shaw’s application for writ of certiorari filed on 

August 18, 2020, is hereby accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be 

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant 

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move 

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, October 13, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000599

13-OCT-2020

03:10 PM

Dkt. 15 OGAC
#### In the Matter of the Application of Universal Film Exchanges, Inc., Petitioner, for an Order to Examine Peter Bondi, Respondent, in an Arbitration Proceeding About to Be Commenced by the Applicant.

Supreme Court, Brie County,

August 12, 1936.

*Drew & Drew,*for the motion,

*Herbert T. Silverberg,*opposed.

MacGregor, J.

The respondent moves to vacate an *ex parte*order granted by Mr. Justice Larkin on July 21, 1936, directing the examination of one Peter Bondi. The respondent objects to the order for the examination, which examination was for the purpose of determining a proper party to an arbitration proceeding, upon the ground that such an examination is not permitted in an arbitration proceeding under sections 295 and 308 of the Civil Practice Act.

It appears that in 1923, after the decision in the case of *Matter of Interocean Mercantile Corp.*(204 App. Div. 284), an amendment to the Arbitration Law was made. Section 6-a was added, which provided that an *“*arbitration of a controversy under a contract or submission described in section two shall be deemed a special proceeding,” etc. In the case of *Matter of Interocean Mercantile Corp.*(207 App. Div. 164) it is held that “ an open commission to take the testimony of non-resident witnesses may be granted in arbitration proceedings under section 308 of the Civil Practice Act, since section 6-a of the Arbitration Law, as added by chapter 341 of the Laws of 1923, provides that arbitration shall be deemed a special proceeding.”

In the case of *Lauffer*v. *Eastern Star Temple*(210 App. Div. 619) it is held that “ A plaintiff in a prospective action who is *417unable to identify the person or persons liable is, on a proper showing, entitled to an order * * * for the examination of witnesses who are shown to have some knowledge or information as to the identification of those who are liable to the prospective plaintiff.”

To the same effect is *Matter of Silverberg*(153 Misc. 126; affd., 243 App. Div. 854).

The respondent also claims that this application is barred because of the fact that there has been a previous arbitration, but it is shown that objection was made by the person proposed to be examined to the validity of the arbitration, and the award was never confirmed. It is, therefore, a nullity and is not a bar to this proceeding.

The motion to set aside the order is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                       FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Omega Ventures Group, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), the
undersigned, John R. Rask, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
     (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2005            /S/ John R. Rask
                              ----------------------------------------
                              John R. Rask, Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative or Renee I-Tallman, Contact Representative: 

Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303,  Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-10438 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
Exhibit 15.(a).1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-11848 and 333-138200 on Form F-3 of our report dated April 28, 2016, relating to the financial statements of G. Willi-Food International Ltd. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of G. Willi-Food International Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2015.
 
 /s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.
 Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.
 A Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
 Tel-Aviv, Israel
 April 28, 2016
NUMBER 13-17-00437-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

RICARDO VAIZ AND 

MARIA F. VAIZ, Appellants,

v.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION, AURORA BANK, FSB,

LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, FSB, AND 

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Appellees.

On appeal from the 138th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

 

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

On April 16, 2019, appellees filed a notice of bankruptcy in this appeal. On April 

22, 2019, this Court, on request of the parties, abated this case due to an automatic stay

from a bankruptcy proceeding. See 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a); TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2.
2

On August 5 and August 18, 2021, the parties notified this Court that the 

bankruptcy proceedings have been resolved and therefore, this case can now be 

reinstated. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

24th day of August 2021.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1294

DR. ROLAND ONAWOLA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY; THE JOHNS HOPKINS

UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES; DR. JONATHAN

SAMET; DR. KATHY HELZLSOUER; DR. GEORGE

COMSTOCK; DR. ROSA CRUM; DR. TAHA TAHA, 

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RAYMOND A. MASON, Chair, JHU Trustees; C.

MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, Vice Chair, JHU Trustees;

ERNEST A. BATES, Vice Chair, JHU Trustees;

GEORGE L. BUNTING, JR., Vice Chair, JHU

Trustees; WILLIAM R. BRODY; RAY GILLIAM; KEVIN

MCDONALD; ALFRED SOMMER; PATRICIA GERMAIN;

GENEVIEVE MATANOSKI; LEON GORDIS; MARGARET

ENSMINGER; FRANCIS BURMAN; JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH

20,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:05-cv01924-AMD)

Submitted: February 23, 2007 Decided: March 13, 2007
- 2 -

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roland Onawola, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Shams Roberts, JOHNS

HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Roland Onawola appeals the district court’s order

entering judgment for Defendants in this action alleging breach of

contract and discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Onawola v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:05-

cv-01924-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-94,440-01

EX P ARTE D’JAM AN K ESH OD WEST , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 12939-D(1) IN THE 350 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenc ed to twe nty y ear s’ imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ o f habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that he was denied his rig ht to an appea l due to no fault of his own. The trial court ag ree s. There was a brea kdown in the sy stem wher e the person responsible for notify ing appellate counsel of his appointment believed that notice was to be held. The trial court knew of Applicant’s desire to appea l and intended to timely appoint counsel, but notice of that appointment was not sent to appe llate counse l until after the time to file a notice of a

ppeal ha d passed. Relief is g rante d. Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant may2

file an out-of-time appea l of his conviction in cause number 12939-D from the 350 District Court t h of T ay l o r C ounty

. Wit hin ten day s from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Ap p l icant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by

co u n s el , the t rial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him on direc t appea l. Should Applicant decide to appea l, he must file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within thirty day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Te xa s D e p a r tm e n t o f Cr im in al J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Deliver ed: J anuar

y 25, 2023 Do not publish
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 6, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 0057 8

- CR

Sedric Houston, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and

the parties’ arguments, the Co urt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s

judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                      ROSE HILLS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT FOR RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   PREDECESSOR
                                    PROFORMA    COMPANY               YEARS ENDED
                                     PERIOD      PERIOD               DECEMBER 31,
                            YEAR   FROM JAN. 1 FROM NOV.              (PREDECESSOR
                           ENDED     THROUGH   19 THROUGH              PROFORMA)
                          DECEMBER  NOV. 18,    DEC. 31,     1996    ----------------
                          31, 1997    1996        1996    (PROFORMA) 1995  1994  1993
                          -------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----  ----  ----
<S>                       <C>      <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>   <C>   <C>
Earnings:
 Income (Loss) before
  income taxes..........    (1.7)      1.7        (0.5)       1.2     4.5   3.6   1.0
Add: Fixed charges,
 net....................    16.5       1.5         2.0        3.6     2.6   2.2   2.2
                            ----      ----        ----       ----    ----  ----  ----
 Income (Loss) before
  income taxes and fixed
  charges, net..........    14.8       3.2         1.5        4.8     7.1   5.8   3.2
Fixed Charges: Total in-
 terest expense.........    16.5       1.5         2.0        3.6     2.6   2.2   2.2
 Interest factor in
  rents.................     0.0       0.0         0.0        0.0     0.0   0.0   0.0
                            ----      ----        ----       ----    ----  ----  ----
  Total fixed charges...    16.5       1.5         2.0        3.6     2.6   2.2   2.2
Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges..........    0.90      2.13        0.75       1.33    2.73  2.64  1.45
Coverage Deficiency (Ex-
 cess)..................     1.7      (1.7)        0.5       (1.2)   (4.5) (3.6) (1.0)
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2011 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2011

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the prohibition on 
                   stalking, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 2000

 Mr. Ashcroft introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the prohibition on 
                   stalking, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stalking Prevention and Victim 
Protection Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF THE PROHIBITION ON STALKING.

    (a) In General.--Section 2261A of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 2261A. Stalking
    ``(a) Whoever--
            ``(1) for the purpose of stalking an individual, travels or 
        causes another to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, 
        uses or causes another to use the mail or any facility in 
        interstate or foreign commerce, or enters or leaves, or causes 
        another to enter or leave, Indian country; or
            ``(2) within the special maritime and territorial 
        jurisdiction of the United States or within Indian country, 
        stalks an individual, shall be punished as provided in section 
        2261.
    ``(b) For purposes of this section, a person stalks an individual 
if that person engages in conduct--
            ``(1) with the intent to injure or harass the individual; 
        and
            ``(2) that places the individual in reasonable fear of the 
        death of, or serious bodily injury (as defined for the purposes 
        of section 2119) to, that individual, a member of that 
        individual's immediate family (as defined in section 115), or 
        that individual's intimate partner.
    ``(c) The court shall at the time of sentencing for an offense 
under this section issue an appropriate protection order designed to 
protect the victim from further stalking by the convicted person. Such 
an order shall remain in effect for such time as the court deems 
necessary, and may be modified, extended or terminated at any time 
after notice to the victim and opportunity for a hearing.''.
    (b) Detention Pending Trial.--Section 3156(a)(4)(C) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting ``, or section 2261A'' 
after ``117''.
    (c) Clerical Amendent.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 110A of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 
the item relating to section 2261A and inserting the following:

``2261A. Stalking.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12040 and #12041]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of VIRGINIA (FEMA-1874-DR), dated 02/16/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Winter Storm and Snowstorm.                    

*Incident Period:*                         12/18/2009 through 12/20/2009.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/04/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/19/2010.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/16/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, dated 02/16/2010, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Covington City, Galax City, Radford City                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-11197 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P