alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1820

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude national service

educational awards from the recipient’s gross income.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 28, 1999

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

national service educational awards from the recipient’s

gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF NATIONAL SERVICE EDU4 CATIONAL AWARDS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 117 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified scholarships) is

7 amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(e) QUALIFIED NATIONAL SERVICE EDUCATIONAL

9 AWARDS.—
2

•S 1820 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Gross income for any tax2 able year shall not include any qualified national

3 service educational award.

4 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED NATIONAL SERVICE EDU5 CATIONAL AWARD.—For purposes of this

6 subsection—

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified

8 national service educational award’ means any

9 amount received by an individual in a taxable

10 year as a national service educational award

11 under section 148 of the National and Commu12 nity Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12604) to

13 the extent (except as provided in subparagraph

14 (C)) such amount does not exceed the qualified

15 tuition and related expenses (as defined in sub16 section (b)(2)) of the individual for such taxable

17 year.

18 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION OF EXPENSES.—

19 The total amount of the qualified tuition and

20 related expenses (as so defined) which may be

21 taken into account under subparagraph (A)

22 with respect to an individual for the taxable

23 year shall be reduced (after the application of

24 the reduction provided in section 25A(g)(2)) by

25 the amount of such expenses which were taken
3

•S 1820 IS

1 into account in determining the credit allowed

2 to the taxpayer or any other person under sec3 tion 25A with respect to such expenses.

4 ‘‘(C) EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION.—The

5 limitation under subparagraph (A) shall not

6 apply to any portion of a national service edu7 cational award used by such individual to repay

8 any student loan described in section 148(a)(1)

9 of such Act or to pay any interest expense de10 scribed in section 148(a)(4) of such Act.’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 this section shall apply to amounts received in taxable

13 years beginning after December 31, 1999.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-110942) of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.,
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126685) pertaining to the InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan, the InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. 1997
Consultant Stock Option Plan, the InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. 1999 Equity Compensation Plan, and the InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. 2004 Equity Compensation Plan,
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126290) pertaining to the 2005 Stock Plan of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.,
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-116675, 333-96771, 333-63604, 333-61497, and 333-47586) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan, as amended;
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 14, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Salix
Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|LOGO                   
|Raleigh, North Carolina
|March 14, 2006
No. 1,903.

#### STATE ex rel. HOPKINS, Relator, *v.*McRAE et al., Respondents.

Original — Writ of Prohibition.

Decided December 24, 1902.

*Mr. E. J. Dierics, Mr. Sydney Sarmer, and Messrs. F. & H. Collins,*for Relator.

Per Curiam.

— Relator’s application for a writ of prohibition herein is denied.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 162

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to change the determination

of the 50,000-barrel refinery limitation on oil depletion deduction from

a daily basis to an annual average daily basis.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. BREAUX (for himself, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. HELMS, and Mr. NICKLES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to change

the determination of the 50,000-barrel refinery limitation

on oil depletion deduction from a daily basis to an annual

average daily basis.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF LARGE REFINER EXCEP4 TION TO OIL DEPLETION DEDUCTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 613A(d)(4) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain refiners ex7 cluded) is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 162 IS

1 ‘‘(4) CERTAIN REFINERS EXCLUDED.—If the

2 taxpayer or a related person engages in the refining

3 of crude oil, subsection (c) shall not apply to the

4 taxpayer for a taxable year if the average daily refin5 ery runs of the taxpayer and the related person for

6 the taxable year exceed 50,000 barrels. For purposes

7 of this paragraph, the average daily refinery runs for

8 any taxable year shall be determined by dividing the

9 aggregate refinery runs for the taxable year by the

10 number of days in the taxable year.’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 this section applies to taxable years beginning after De13 cember 31, 1998.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1990 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1990

     To designate the Federal building located at 501 I Street in 
     Sacramento, California, as the ``Joe Serna, Jr. United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 1999

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To designate the Federal building located at 501 I Street in 
     Sacramento, California, as the ``Joe Serna, Jr. United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOE SERNA, JR. UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE AND 
              FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 501 I Street in Sacramento, 
California, shall be known and designated as the ``Joe Serna, Jr. 
United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Joe Serna, Jr. 
United States Courthouse and Federal Building.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CEO/CFO Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation, respectively,
certify that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation and subsidiary
at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim
any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|               |  |                                                                                                               
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 27,
2009 |  | /s/ Robert H. Gilliam, Jr.                                                                                    
|Date           |  | Robert H. Gilliam, Jr., President and                                                                         
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)                                                         
|               | 
|March 27,
2009 |  | /s/ Bryan M. Lemley                                                                                           
|Date           |  | Bryan M. Lemley, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
VII

Private Calendar No. 28

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2019

[Report No. 106–965]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

For the relief of Malia Miller.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MALIA

4 MILLER.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Malia Miller shall be eligible for issuance of an immi8 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an
2

•S 2019 RH

1 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec2 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

3 permanent resident.

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Malia Miller enters

5 the United States before the filing deadline specified in

6 subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered and

7 remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligi8 ble for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Im9 migration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment

10 of this Act.

11 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

12 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap13 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica14 tion for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

15 fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of this

16 Act.

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to Malia Miller, the Secretary of State shall in20 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur21 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im22 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the

23 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

24 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

25 total number of immigrant visas that are made available
3

•S 2019 RH

1 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

2 202(e) of such Act.

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 22), 2000.
Private Calendar No. 28

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2019

[Report No. 106–965]

A BILL

For the relief of Malia Miller.

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be

printed
**EXHIBIT      21**

**JAKKS      PACIFIC, INC. SUBSIDIARIES**

| **Subsidiary**                                            |   | **Jurisdiction**    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| JAKKS                Pacific (HK) Limited            |   | Hong                Kong |
| JAKKS                Pacific (Shenzhen) Company      |   | China                    |
| JAKKS                Pacific (Asia) Limited          |   | Hong                Kong |
| Play                Along (Hong Kong) Limited        |   | Hong                Kong |
| Road                Champs, Inc.                     |   | Delaware                 |
| Road                Champs Limited                   |   | Hong                Kong |
| PA                Distribution, Inc.                 |   | Delaware                 |
| Creative                Designs International, Ltd.  |   | Delaware                 |
| Arbor                Toys Company Limited            |   | Hong                Kong |
| JAKKS                Sales Corporation               |   | Delaware                 |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Elamex, S.A. de C.V. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended on December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") and to
which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Richard R. Harshman, the
principal executive officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: March 31, 2005

/s/ Richard R. Harshman
------------------------------
Richard R. Harshman
President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       51
#### Territory, respondent, *v.*Fallis, appellant.

Appeals in criminal causes. The appellant was indicted at the November term, 1873, and tried and convicted at the June term, 1873; a hill of exceptions was signed, but no notice of appeal was ever given; upon applica-' tion,the judge refused to correct the bill in vacation and within six months after the rendition of the judgment; the bill was corrected at the following term, more than six months after the j udgment had been rendered. *Held,*that this court did not have jurisdiction of the case.

*Appeal from Second*District, *Missoula Gounty.*

The action was tried before Knowles, J.

W. J. StepheNs, for appellant.

J. *G.*Bobinson, District Attorney, Second District, for respondent.

Seryis, J.

The appellant, by counsel, files his petition to this court for leave to file a transcript upon appeal from the district court of Missoula county, in this cause. Upon an examination of the record in the action, it appears that, at the November term of said district court, 1812, the appellant was indicted for the crime of *murder;*that at the June term of said court, 1873,' he was convicted of the crime of manslaughter and sentenced to the Territorial prison for the period of six years; that a bill of exceptions was taken and signed upon the rulings upon the’ *237indictment and tbe trial; that no notice of appeal was ever given, as required by law; that, subsequent to the trial, after the term had expired, and within the time by which an appeal might have been perfected, the appellant, by counsel, applied to the judge who held said court, at chambers, to amend and correct said bill of exceptions; that he refused so to do at chambers; and that, at the next term of said court, after the expiration of six months from the time of said trial, said court did correct and amend said bill of exceptions as requested.

Upon this state of facts, we are asked to take jurisdiction and hear this case as upon an appeal, which has been duly perfected.

Appeals in criminal actions may be taken by filing a notice of an intention to appeal within six months from the rendition of the judgment, and filing a transcript in this court within thirty days thereafter. Cod. Sts. 249, §§ 396, 397. A compliance with this statute alone gives this court jurisdiction. The appellant has not complied with this statute, and his application must be denied.

If the appellant had given his notice of appeal and filed his transcript as provided by law, and afterward corrected the record in the court below *nunc pro*tunc, we might have heard the case upon the appeal as in other eases.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of
Cadence Financial Corporation (the Corporation) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lewis F. Mallory, Jr., the Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Lewis F. Mallory, Jr.Name:

Lewis F. Mallory, Jr.Title:

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

May 8, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence
Financial Corporation and will be retained by Cadence Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion filed January 26 , 201 2



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 11

- 00367

- C R

__________

ROEL GARZA

, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 35 th District Court

Brown County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR

- 21

, 147

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Roel Garza has filed in th is court a motion to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.2, the motion is signed by both appellant and his counsel.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

January 26 , 2012

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak , J.
#### In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Schwartz Tire Corporation, Judgment Creditor, *v.*Louis Gershon and Another, Doing Business as Gershon Trucking Co., and Gershon Trucking Co., Inc., Judgment Debtors.

City Court of New York, Special Term, Bronx County,

September 11, 1936.

*David Frank,*for the judgment creditor.

*Harry Gershon,*judgment debtor, in person.

Evans, J.

This is an application to compel the debtor to pay a judgment, in installments, under section 793 of the Civil Practice Act. The only basis for the order sought is that, at Special Term, after motion made and granted, on default, the debtor’s salary was fixed at sixty dollars weekly. For that reason, solely, the creditor asks the court to order the debtor to pay six dollars weekly. The order fixing the salary at sixty dollars was made on representation to the court that the debtor was president of a corporation, for which he performed services presumably of the value of sixty dollars weekly. The moving papers say that the debtor was examined in supplementary proceedings, but nothing is indicated as to the facts elicited, during the examination, as to the debtor’s income, necessary expenditures or obligations. I am unable to make an order under section 793 of the Civil Practice Act, solely upon the ground that another justice granted a motion to *fix*the judgment debtor’s salary.

The fixation of a salary will permit the issuance of a garnishee order and, if the garnishee order be not honored, the creditor may *440bring suit to determine and collect the reasonable weekly salary against the employer. *(Diamond*v. *Schulte Bakers, Inc.,*136 Misc. 195.) Such a fixation of salary obviously is for the purpose of proceeding by way of garnishee. An order under section 793 of the Civil Practice Act must be made upon different considerations. The court is obliged to inquire not only as to the income of the debtor, but as to his necessary expenditures and obligations. There is not a sufficient showing in the moving papers to warrant the courf in making an order. Motion denied with leave to renew upon proper papers.