alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Commonwealth v. Payne.

(Decided April 18, 1911.)

Appeal from Allen Circuit Court.

Dog Tax — Failure to Pay — A tax .payer who fails to pay Ms dog’ tax after he has listed the dog with, the assessor is not liable to a fine under subsection 7 of section 68a Kentucky Statutes.

JAMES BREATHITT, Attorney General, TOM B. McGREGOR,

Assistant Attorney General and SHERMAN B. DIXON, for appellant-GOAD and ODIVER for appellee.

OpiNxon or the Court by

Chiep Justice Hobson

Affirming.

The charge against appellee, Will Payne, upon which this prosecution is based, is in these words:

> “The said Payne did then and there unlawfully fail to pay the tax on a dog listed by him for taxation for the year 1910, tax for same being due March 1st of said year. Said Payne did own and keep said dog on his premises or elsewhere.”

*170Subsection 7 of section 68a, Kentucky Statutes, under which this prosecution was instituted, is as follows:

> “Any owner or harborer of a dog, subject to be taxed, who shall fail or refuse to list the same with the assessor, shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $10 for each dog he so fails or refuses to list for taxation; and any person who shall keep or harbor a dog upon his premises or elsewhere, and who fails or refuses to pay the tax thereon when due, shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $25 for each offense and, upon conviction, the judgment may include an order requiring such dog to be killed, which order may be executed by any peace officer, who shall be allowed $1 therefor, to be taxed as costs.”

The circuit court held that no offense was stated against the defendant. The prosecution having been dismissed, the Commonwealth appeals.

Reading the section as a whole we think it manifest that the Legislature did not intend to impose a fine of $25 on a man for failing to pay his taxes. While taxes are not strictly a debt, they are a demand against the taxpayer, and the entire legislative history of the State shows that the mere non-payment of such taxes has never been made a public offense. Imprisonment for debt has been abolished, and this would be practically to imprison a man for the nonpayment of money. The words “fail or refuse” in the statute should be read as synonymous. The refusal to list the dog subjects the owner or harborer of it to a fine of $10. The next clause of the statute was aimed at a class of perspns who keep or harbor dogs upon their premises or elsewhere and yet do not claim to own them. It is well known that many persons when the assessor comes around disclaim the ownership of dogs seen on their premises. The second clause of the statute was aimed at this class of persons. If a person keeps or harbors a dog upon his premises or elsewhere, and fails to list it with the assesor, and to pay the tax on it, he is subject to a fine of $25. The person who keeps or harbors a dog and does not list it. becomes liable to the $10 penalty; he may escape the $25- penalty if, after this, he pays the tax on it. But the statute was not intended to punish the owner of a dog simply for failing to pay his taxes after he has given in his list as required by law.

Judgment affirmed.
#### HOFFMAN et al., Respondents, *v.*BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF GALLATIN COUNTY et al., Appellants.

[Submitted March 10, 1896.

Decided May 4, 1896.]

S ee syllabus and opinion in *Hoffman*v. *Board of Commissioners of Gallatin County, ante,*page 224.

*Appeal from Ninth Judicial*District, *Gallatin Cov/nty.*

Action to enjoin issuance of county bonds.

Defendant’s motion to dissolve the injunction was denied by ARMSTRONG, J.

*Sanders <& Sanders*and *John A.*Dace, for Appellants.

*Cockrill <& Pierce,*for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

—This appeal is from an order of the district court refusing to dissolve an injunction. The cause of action involves the conduct of the board of county commissioners in attempting to borrow the same $30,000 referred to in the case of *Hoffman*v. *Board of Commissioners of Gallatin*County, ante, page 224, and the same warrants, and the threatened delivery of the same bonds. It is, in fact, substantially the same case.

The action of the district court in refusing to dissolve the injunction must be affirmed, upon the authority of the case (No. 678) above referred to.

*Affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (the Company) for the period
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Adam C. Derbyshire, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Adam C. DerbyshireAdam C. DerbyshireSenior Vice President, Finance & Administration, and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 13, 2008
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 6, 2010

y0429 

# Order

May 6, 2010

140219

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140219 COA: 287177 Ottawa CC: 07-031561-FC BREN HAYDEN BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JAMIYLAH BURNS,

Respondent

v.

BLAKELEY COOPER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 628 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. Application to Supplement the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
First Amendment to Sublease Agreement - Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.89 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE 
 THIS FIRST
AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE (this “First Amendment”) is made as of the 8th day of April, 2009 by and between TITAN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., a
Delaware corporation (hereinafter “Sublessor”), and ANESIVA, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter “Sublessee”). 
 WITNESSETH 
 WHEREAS, Sublessor and Sublessee entered into that certain Sublease dated as of March 27, 2009 (the
“Sublease”) with respect to certain premises located on the fifth floor of that building commonly known and designated as 400 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, California (the “Subleased Premises”); and 
 WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco has fully and finally determined the suite designation to be used to identify the Subleased Premises; and

 WHEREAS, Sublessor and Sublessee desire to amend the Sublease to incorporate such governmentally mandated suite designation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings as ascribed to them in the Sublease. 
 2. The Sublease shall be and hereby is amended to delete any and all references to words and numbers “Ste. 503” and “Suite 503” as
currently set forth therein and to replace such words and numbers in each instance with the words and numbers “Suite 502” so as to reflect that the Subleased Premises is and shall be known and designated as Suite 502 pursuant to the
mandate of the City of South San Francisco. This substitution of the words and numbers “Suite 502” shall include, without limitation, substitution of such words and numbers in the notice address of Sublessee under the Sublease. 

3. Except as expressly amended and modified hereby, the Sublease shall continue unmodified and in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and
confirmed. This First Amendment may be executed in counterpart, which, taken together, shall constitute a single original instrument. Electronic and/or facsimile signatures on this First Amendment shall be deemed as effective and enforceable as
original signatures; provided, however, each party shall be obligated, on the request of the other party, to provide such original signature promptly if and when so requested. 
 [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this First Amendment on the day
and year written below. 
  

									
		 		 	SUBLESSOR:
			
		 		 	TITAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
			
	Attest:	 		 	
				
	 	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Robert Farrell
		 		 		 	Name:	 	Robert Farrell
		 		 		 	Title:	 	President & CEO
		 		 		 	Date:	 	4/8/09
			
		 		 	SUBLESSEE:
			
		 		 	ANESIVA, INC.
			
	Attest:	 		 	
				
	 	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Michael Kranda
		 		 		 	Name:	 	Michael Kranda
		 		 		 	Title:	 	President & CEO
		 		 		 	Date:	 	__________________
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2020

To adjust the boundary of the Natchez Trace Parkway, Mississippi, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1, 2000

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself and Mr. LOTT) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

A BILL

To adjust the boundary of the Natchez Trace Parkway,

Mississippi, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

4 In this Act:

5 (1) PARKWAY.—The term ‘‘Parkway’’ means

6 the Natchez Trace Parkway, Mississippi.

7 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means

8 the Secretary of the Interior.
2

•S 2020 IS

1 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT AND LAND ACQUISITION.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall adjust the

3 boundary of the Parkway to include approximately—

4 (1) 150 acres of land, as generally depicted on

5 the map entitled ‘‘Alternative Alignments/Area’’,

6 numbered 604–20062A and dated May 1998; and

7 (2) 80 acres of land, as generally depicted on

8 the map entitled ‘‘Emerald Mound Development

9 Concept Plan’’, numbered 604–20042E and dated

10 August 1987.

11 (b) MAPS.—The maps referred to in subsection (a)

12 shall be on file and available for public inspection in the

13 office of the Director of the National Park Service.

14 (c) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary may acquire the

15 land described in subsection (a) by donation, purchase

16 with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange (includ17 ing exchange with the State of Mississippi, local govern18 ments, and private persons).

19 (d) ADMINISTRATION.—Land acquired under this

20 section shall be administered by the Secretary as part of

21 the Parkway.

22 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF LEASING.

23 The Secretary, acting through the Superintendent of

24 the Parkway, may lease land within the boundary of the

25 Parkway to the city of Natchez, Mississippi, for any pur26 pose compatible with the Parkway.
3

•S 2020 IS

1 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

3 as are necessary to carry out this Act.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2057

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit the use of electronic

measurement units (EMUs).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 2000

Mr. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit the

use of electronic measurement units (EMUs).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motorists Privacy Act

5 of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ELECTRONIC MEASURE7 MENT UNITS.

8 Part I of title III of the Communications Act of 1934

9 (47 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end

10 the following new section:
2

•S 2057 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 338. PROHIBITION ON USE OF ELECTRONIC MEAS2 UREMENT UNITS.

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—No person may install, post, op4 erate, or otherwise use an electronic measurement unit

5 (EMU).

6 ‘‘(b) ELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT UNIT DEFINED.—

7 In subsection (a), the term ‘electronic measurement unit

8 (EMU)’ means a device that determines the frequency of

9 the radio broadcast being received by a radio receiver lo10 cated within a vehicle passing through the operating range

11 of the device.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Integrated Security Systems, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.







/s/ SHARON DOHERTY

Sharon Doherty

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1967 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1967

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
  To make technical corrections to the status of certain land held in 
trust for the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, to take certain land 
            into trust for that Band, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATUS OF CERTAIN INDIAN LANDS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law--
        (1) all land taken in trust by the United States for the 
    benefit of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians on or after 
    December 23, 1944, shall be part of the Mississippi Choctaw Indian 
    Reservation;
        (2) all land held in fee by the Mississippi Band of Choctaw 
    Indians located within the boundaries of the State of Mississippi, 
    as shown in the report entitled ``Report of Fee Lands owned by the 
    Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians'', dated September 28, 1999, on 
    file in the Office of the Superintendent, Choctaw Agency, Bureau of 
    Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior, is hereby declared to 
    be held by the United States in trust for the benefit of the 
    Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians; and
        (3) land made part of the Mississippi Choctaw Indian 
    Reservation after December 23, 1944, shall not be considered to be 
    part of the ``initial reservation'' of the tribe for the purposes 
    of section 20(b)(1)(B)(ii) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 
    U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(B)(ii)).
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to alter the application or the requirements of the Indian 
Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) with respect to any 
lands held by or for the benefit of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw 
Indians regardless of when such lands were acquired.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

      (1)   Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for
            the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with
            the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: March 7, 2007

                                   /s/ Terrance D. Paul
                                   --------------------------------
                                   Name: Terrance D. Paul
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer

THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY
FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of G. Willi-Food International Ltd.
(the "COMPANY") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Ety
Sabach, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     Date: June 29, 2009

                                                By: /s/ Ety Sabach
                                                ------------------
                                                Ety Sabach
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                (Principal Financial Officer)
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1839

To provide that land which is owned by the Lower Sioux Indian Community

in the State of Minnesota but which is not held in trust by the United

States for the Community may be leased or transferred by the Community without further approval by the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 1, 1999

Mr. WELLSTONE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To provide that land which is owned by the Lower Sioux

Indian Community in the State of Minnesota but which

is not held in trust by the United States for the Community may be leased or transferred by the Community

without further approval by the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND

4 TRANSACTIONS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, without further approval, ratification, or au7 thorization by the United States, the Lower Sioux Indian
2

•S 1839 IS

1 Community in the State of Minnesota (referred to in this

2 section as the ‘‘Community’’), may lease, sell, convey, war3 rant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of the Commu4 nity’s interest in any real property that is not held—

5 (1) within the borders of the Lower Sioux Res6 ervation; or

7 (2) in trust by the United States for the benefit

8 of the Community.

9 (b) TRUST LAND NOT AFFECTED.—Nothing in this

10 section is intended or shall be construed to—

11 (1) authorize the Community to lease, sell, con12 vey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part

13 of an interest in any real property that is held in

14 trust by the United States for the benefit of the

15 Community; or

16 (2) affect the operation of any law governing

17 leasing, selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise

18 transferring any interest in such trust land.

Æ