alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Office of Justice Programs

          - [OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1518]

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is hosting a Body Armor Compliance Testing Program Workshop for manufacturers and test laboratories on Tuesday, May 18, 2010, from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. NIJ is hosting this workshop specifically to update manufacturers and test laboratories with regard to the Compliance Testing Program, status of testing, administrative clarifications, and the follow-up inspection and testing process. This will be an open forum and there will ample opportunities for attendees to ask questions. Participants are strongly encouraged to come prepared to ask questions.

                        Space is limited at this workshop, and as a result, only 100 participants will be allowed to register. We request that each manufacturer and test laboratory limit their representatives to no more than two per organization. Exceptions to this limit may occur, should space allow. Participants planning to attend are responsible for their own travel arrangements. Please use the following                         *http://www.justnet.org/​Pages/​RecordView.aspx?​itemid=​2396*                         to see an agenda and obtain the registration form to attend the Workshop. You will receive a response to your request within 2 business days.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Westin Annapolis Hotel, 100 Westgate Circle, Annapolis, MD 21401.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jennifer O'Connor, by telephone at 202–307–0070 [Note: this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-mail at                         *Jennifer.O'Connor@usdoj.gov.*

Kristina Rose,

Acting Director, National Institute of Justice.

[FR Doc. 2010–10922 Filed 5–7–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<CIK> 0000743241
<NAME> REII INCORPORATED
<S>                          <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                18,941
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,808,545
<PP&E>                                             1,712,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1,808,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,704,848
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               4,655
<OTHER-SE>                                           405,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1,808,545
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     104,751
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        118,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      20,536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (34,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (34,470)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.007)








</TABLE>
#### Stevens v. Gale et al.

1. PRACTICE: MOTION POR NEW TRIAD: APPEAL prom. Where a notice of appeal is merely from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the appeal will be dismissed on motion in this Court.

2. appeal: PINAL JUDGMENT. There must be a final determination of the action in the court below, and a notice of appeal therefrom, to give this Court jurisdiction,

*3713. noticie oí? appeaii : amendment oe. Motion to amend the notice of appeal so as to include an appeal from final judgment, *denied.*

*Appeal from, the District Court of Minnehaha County.*

*R. F. Pettigrew*and *E. Padiman,*for appellant.

*Bartlett Tripp*and *M. Grigsby,*for respondent.

No briefs on motion filed.

MotioN of respondents for an order to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that no appeal lies to this court from an order denying a motion for a new trial, unaccompanied by an appeal from final judgment:

Also motion of appellant’s counsel for an order granting leave to amend the notice of appeal so as to include an appeal from final judgment.

Shannon, C. J.

The notice of appeal in this case is merely from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

There is' no notice of appeal from any final judgment. In fact, the record before us contains no copy of any judgment. By reference to section 299 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it will be found that a *copy of the judgment,*in any case, is essential to constitute the judgment roll. Therefore, if there was any final judgment in this action the record does not disclose it; and we cannot look beyond the record.

By a former decision of this court, followed by an Act of the Legislative Assembly, approved February 20, 1879, there can be no appeal from any order to the Supreme Court before final determination of the action in which such order is made; but upon a final judgment or decision being rendered, the appellant, on his appeal from such final judgment or decision, may have any intermediate order enumerated in the 22nd section of the Code reviewed by designating such order in his notice of appeal from the final judgment or decision. It follows that there must be a final *372determination of the action and a notice of appeal therefrom in order to give this court any jurisdiction. As neither of these essentials appears upon the record, the order asked for by the respondents to dismiss the appeal must be granted; and the motion of appellant to amend the notice of appeal must be denied.

All the Justices present concurring.
Exhibit 32.2

                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, I, the undersigned
Chief  Financial Officer of American Ecology Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify,  based  on  my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for  the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934  and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ James R. Baumgardner
------------------------
James R. Baumgardner
April 30, 2004




<PAGE>
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 National Institute for Occupational

 Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

Phone: 513-533-6825 

Fax: 513-533-6826 

June 6, 2011 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00173 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Norton Co. (or a subsequent owner) in Worcester, MA, as an addition to 

the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000. On April 29, 2011, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the 

SEC: 

All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked in any building or area at the facility owned by 

the Norton Co. (or a subsequent owner) in Worcester, Massachusetts, during the period from 

January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962, for a number of work days aggregating at least 

250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work 

days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included 

in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on May 29, 2011, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on May 29, 2011, members of this class of employees, defined as 

reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

[Signature on file]

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

 Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited June 30, 1997 consolidated financial statements of Community
Bancorp, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        18567549
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               6700000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   34124593
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        59208361
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          59099345
<LOANS>                                      137554263
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3439250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               261074610
<DEPOSITS>                                   218188324
<SHORT-TERM>                                  20135834
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1551369
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7998045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    13201038
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               261074610
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6352263
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2777012
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                156032
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               9285307
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2966537
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3330100
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5955207
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4671677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2574947
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2574947
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1600573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .545
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .545
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.23
<LOANS-NON>                                    1076961
<LOANS-PAST>                                    231449
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3481705
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    70223
<RECOVERIES>                                     27768
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3439250
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1588521
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1850729
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  9
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             4,740
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             3,218
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       32,320
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             9,489
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               9,713
<LOANS>                                         102,610
<ALLOWANCE>                                        1,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   155,904
<DEPOSITS>                                       134,337
<SHORT-TERM>                                         919
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                1,649
<LONG-TERM>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        16,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   155,904
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    4,550
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1,182
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    129
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   5,861
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 2,462
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    47
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              3,351
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  286
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,840
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1,305
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,305




<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      4.10
<LOANS-NON>                                          106
<LOANS-PAST>                                           4
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     531
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    3,804
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   1,933
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        26
<RECOVERIES>                                          12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  1,933
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               1,933
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            1,402
        

</TABLE>
J-S58042-15

_____________________________

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

CHAD MULHOLLAND

Appellant No. 746 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence March 2, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-06-CR-0002537-2014

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., OLSON, J., and PLATT, J.*

MEMORANDUM BY GANTMAN, P.J.: FILED OCTOBER 02, 2015

Appellant, Chad Mulholland, appeals from the judgment of sentence 

entered in the Berks County Court of Common Pleas, following his jury trial 

convictions for the offenses of possession of drug paraphernalia and 

possession of a small amount of marijuana.1

In its opinion, the trial court fully and correctly sets forth the relevant 

facts and procedural history of this case. Therefore, we have no reason to 

restate them. 

Appellant raises the following issues for our review:

WHETHER THE EVIDENCE WAS INSUFFICIENT TO 

____________________________________________

1 35 P.S. §§ 780-113(a)(32) and (31)(i), respectively. 
J-S58042-15

- 2 -

SUPPORT THE GUILTY VERDICTS SINCE THE 

COMMONWEALTH FAILED TO PROVE BEYOND A 

REASONABLE DOUBT THAT [APPELLANT] WAS IN ACTUAL 

OR CONSTRUCTIVE POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA OR 

DRUG PARAPHERNALIA.

WHETHER THE GUILTY VERDICTS WERE AGAINST THE 

WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE WHERE THE BASIS OF 

[APPELLANT’S] CONVICTION WAS THE TESTIMONY OF A 

WOMAN WHO WAS NOT CREDIBLE, GIVEN THAT THE JURY 

HAD FOUND [APPELLANT] NOT GUILTY OF OTHER COUNTS 

BASED ON THE SAME TESTIMONY. 

(Appellant’s Brief at 5). 

After a thorough review of the record, the briefs of the parties, the 

applicable law, and the well-reasoned opinion of the Honorable Thomas G. 

Parisi, we conclude Appellant’s issues merit no relief. The trial court opinion 

comprehensively discusses and properly disposes of the questions 

presented. (See Trial Court Opinion, filed June 11, 2015, at 2-8) (finding: 

(1) Appellant’s girlfriend testified that she argued with Appellant because he 

was using drugs and she was pregnant; Appellant’s girlfriend testified that 

pipe and marijuana belonged to Appellant; Appellant confirmed he shared 

with his girlfriend bedroom where marijuana was found; Appellant’s 

girlfriend testified she found pipe in apartment she shared with Appellant; 

jury could reasonably infer Appellant had equal access to, and ability and 

intent to exercise conscious dominion over, marijuana and paraphernalia 

found in residence; under theory of constructive possession, evidence was 

sufficient to support Appellant’s convictions; (2) evidence presented at trial 

was not contrary to jury verdict; jury was free to weigh testimony of each 
J-S58042-15

- 3 -

witness and determine which evidence it found credible; verdict did not 

shock court’s conscience). Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the trial 

court’s opinion. 

Judgment of sentence affirmed. 

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 10/2/2015
EXHIBIT 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raviv Segal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 30, 2013




By: /s/ Raviv Segal

Name: Raviv Segal

Title:Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 518

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I

No. CR-15-141

JAMES MIKEL REEP

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered September 30, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE SALINE

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. 63CR-14-444-2]

HONORABLE GARY ARNOLD,

JUDGE

SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM

ORDERED

RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge

James Mikel Reep appeals his conviction of driving while intoxicated, fourth offense,

from the Saline County Circuit Court. He argues that the circuit erred in denying his motion

to suppress and in denying his motion for directed verdict. We decline to address the merits

of the appeal at this time because Reep failed to comply with the Arkansas Supreme Court’s

rules governing the contents of the addendum. 

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires that an appellant’s brief include an

addendum consisting of all documents essential to this court’s resolution of the issues on

appeal, including exhibits such as CDs and DVDs. In this case, the State introduced into

evidence a DVD of a dashboard-camera recording of Reep being arrested and several

statements he made to the arresting officer concerning his alcohol intake and his driving. The

DVD was made part of the record and was essential to the circuit court’s consideration of
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 518

Reep’s directed-verdict motion. However, Reep failed to include copies of the DVD in his

addendum as required by our rules. We therefore order him to file a supplemental addendum

within seven calendar days of this order to provide the DVD exhibit to the members of our

court. 

Supplemental addendum ordered. 

HARRISON and BROWN, JJ., agree. 

Ogles Law Firm, by: John Ogles, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Karen Virginia Wallace, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 163

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain coins to

be acquired by individual retirement accounts and other individually

directed pension plan accounts.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain coins to be acquired by individual retirement accounts and other individually directed pension plan accounts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN COINS NOT TREATED AS COLLECT4 IBLES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

6 408(m)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

7 to exception for certain coins and bullion) is amended to

8 read as follows:
2

•S 163 IS

1 ‘‘(A) any coin certified by a recognized

2 grading service and traded on a nationally rec3 ognized electronic network, or listed by a recog4 nized wholesale reporting service, and—

5 ‘‘(i) which is or was at any time legal

6 tender in the United States, or

7 ‘‘(ii) issued under the laws of any

8 State, or’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

11 December 31, 1998.

Æ