alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited September 30, 1996 consolidated financial statements of
Community Bancorp, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                        17636809
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4600000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   30494372
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        55675609
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          55130938
<LOANS>                                      130994629
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3514631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               244745261
<DEPOSITS>                                   211488262
<SHORT-TERM>                                  12431309
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1588000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7998045
<OTHER-SE>                                    11239645
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               244745261
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                9329690
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3459116
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                438714
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              13227520
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4361959
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4748376
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          8479144
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                6320800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3937883
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3937883
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2396768
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .755
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .755
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.20
<LOANS-NON>                                     876522
<LOANS-PAST>                                    706478
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3455098
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   190292
<RECOVERIES>                                    249825
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3514631
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1665807
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1848824
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Written
      Statement of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350





Solely
      for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief
      Executive Officer of American Ecology Corporation (the “Company”), hereby
      certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
      Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







/s/
      Stephen A. Romano


Stephen
      A. Romano


July
      28,
      2006
#### Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Vaughan's Transfer Company.

(Decided May 9, 1911.)

Appeal from Christian Circuit Court.

Affirmed — On authoriy of L. & N. R. Co. v. Vaughan’s Transfer Co . 123 S. W., 253.

• DOUGLAS BELL, S. Y. TRIMBLE, TRABUE, DOOLAN & COX, and C. L. SIVLEY for appellant.

THOS. P. COOK, C. O. PROWSE, for appellee.

*532OpiNioN op the Court by

Judge Caeroll

Affirming.

Except in the particular that the judgment in the suit of the Yaughan Transfer Company v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company was pleaded as a bar to the prosecution of this action, there is no substantial difference between the facts of this case and the facts in the Louisville *&*Nashville Railroad case, both arose out of the same transaction and the law applicable to each .is the same.

Being of the opinion that the plea in bar was not available as a defense, the judgment on the authority of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad case, reported in 123 S. W., 253, is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6488

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. THEODORE THOMAS WAGNER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-03235-GRA)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Thomas Wagner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Theodore Thomas Wagner seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss the action without prejudice and dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion as successive. Wagner also seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El

v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wagner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Wagner’s “petition for pre-enforcement review.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

23 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James A. Langway, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.





/s/ James A. Langway
--------------------
James A. Langway
President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 8, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3311-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Rhode Island (FEMA-3311-EM), dated March 30, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 5, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Craig A. Gilbert, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

This action terminates the appointment of Gracia B. Szczech as Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-11433 Filed 5-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### The Territory v. Couk.

*Writ of error to the District Court of Lawrence County.*

*Campbell & Smith*and *Albert Allen,*for plaintiff in error.

A. *W. Hastie,*District Attorney, 1st Judicial District, for defendant in error.

In this case the defendant was convicted in the District Court of Lawrence county for the crime of murder, in the killing of one Minnie Callison, and the defendant brought the case to the Supreme Court by writ of error. The facts in brief were, that one Minnie Callison was murdered in her house at Deadwood, by being struck on the head with some blunt instrument while she was lying in bed, and sometime in the night time, about August 20, 1878. For this murder the defendant was indicted and convicted. No opinion has been written in the case, as Judge Barnes, to whom it was assigned, went out of office before preparing the opinion. *189The main point decided in the case in this court, and upon which it turned, was this: That the declarations of the deceased, made at a neighbor’s house while she was on her way returning home where she was killed, from a visit to another place in the same town, and shortly before she was killed the same night, where she was going, and whom she expected to meet at home on her arrival, including the defendant, were properly admitted in evidence in the District Court. The Supreme Court, being of the opinion that this case was parallel in principle to the case of *State v.*Hunter, 11 Vroom, (N. J.) 496.

Chief Justice SHANNON dissented.
Exhibit 15.2  KPMG   LLP

Telephone

(416)   228-7000Chartered   Accountants

Fax

(416)   228-7123Yonge   Corporate Centre

Internet

www.kpmg.ca4100   Yonge St.Suite 200North York, ON M2P 2H3  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors Celestica Inc.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113591, 333-88210, 333-71126, 333-66726, 333-63112) and Form F-3 (No. 333-178161) of Celestica Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and January 1, 2010, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information and our report dated March 7, 2012 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the December 31, 2011 Form 20-F of Celestica Inc., and further consent to the use of such reports in such annual report on Form 20-F.     Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants March 22, 2012 Toronto, Canada  KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 204

To amend chapter 5 of title 13, United States Code, to require that any

data relating to the incidence of poverty produced or published by the

Secretary of Commerce for subnational areas is corrected for differences

in the cost of living in those areas.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To amend chapter 5 of title 13, United States Code, to

require that any data relating to the incidence of poverty

produced or published by the Secretary of Commerce

for subnational areas is corrected for differences in the

cost of living in those areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Poverty Data Correc5 tion Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 204 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 5 of title 13, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding after subchapter V the

4 following:

5 ‘‘SUBCHAPTER VI—POVERTY DATA

6 ‘‘§ 197. Correction of subnational data relating to

7 poverty

8 ‘‘(a) Any data relating to the incidence of poverty

9 produced or published by or for the Secretary for sub10 national areas shall be corrected for differences in the cost

11 of living, and data produced for State and sub-State areas

12 shall be corrected for differences in the cost of living for

13 at least all States of the United States.

14 ‘‘(b) Data under this section shall be published in

15 1999 and at least every second year thereafter.

16 ‘‘§ 198. Development of State cost-of-living index and

17 State poverty thresholds

18 ‘‘(a) To correct any data relating to the incidence of

19 poverty for differences in the cost of living, the Secretary

20 shall—

21 ‘‘(1) develop or cause to be developed a State

22 cost-of-living index which ranks and assigns an index

23 value to each State using data on wage, housing,

24 and other costs relevant to the cost of living; and

25 ‘‘(2) multiply the Federal Government’s statis26 tical poverty thresholds by the index value for each
3

•S 204 IS

1 State’s cost of living to produce State poverty

2 thresholds for each State.

3 ‘‘(b) The State cost-of-living index and resulting

4 State poverty thresholds shall be published before Septem5 ber 30, 2000, for calendar year 1999 and shall be updated

6 annually for each subsequent calendar year.’’.

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec8 tions for chapter 5 of title 13, United States Code, is

9 amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SUBCHAPTER VI—POVERTY DATA

‘‘197. Correction of subnational data relating to poverty.

‘‘198. Development of State cost-of-living index and State poverty thresholds.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, I, the undersigned
Chief  Executive Officer of American Ecology Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify,  based  on  my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for  the  period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934  and  that  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Stephen A. Romano
---------------------
Stephen A. Romano
November 1, 2005
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28 , 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 01093

- CV

ANGEL ADAMS , Appellant

V.
BRUCE DOAN , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. 1023716



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
According to information provided to this court, t his appeal is from a judgment signed December 5 , 2012. The record was due February 4, 2013, but it
has not been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record infor med the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On February 7 , 20 13 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2

appellant paid o r made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payme nt. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or filed any response to this court’s
notice

. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2148

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain other single

yarn of viscose rayon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. HOLLINGS (for himself and Mr. THURMOND) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain

other single yarn of viscose rayon.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.xx.xx Other yarn, single, of viscose

rayon with a twist exceeding

120 turns/m (provided for in

subheading 5403.32.00) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.
2

•S 2148 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to

3 goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consump4 tion, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
1

Filed 8/18/15 P. v. Henderson CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

LAMOND S. HENDERSON,

Defendant and Appellant. A144986

(Solano County

Super. Ct. No. FCR184601)

Lamond S. Henderson appeals from an order denying his Proposition 47 petition

for resentencing (Pen. Code, § 1170.18, subd. (a)). His counsel raises no issues and asks

this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any

arguable issues. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was apprised of his

right to file a supplemental brief, but did not do so.

On August 3, 2000, defendant pled no contest to one cou nt of felony first degree

burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). The court sentenced de fendant to the low te r m of two years

in state prison.

On January 15, 2015, defendant petitioned to red uce the felony burglary offense to

a misdemeanor under Proposition 47, rea soning that the value of property that was the

subject of the burglary was less than $950, and thus the offense was akin to a

misdemeanor petty theft offense. The trial court denied the petition, finding that

defendant’s burglary offense is not one of the enumerated crimes subject to reduction by

Proposition 47 (Pen. Code, § 1170.18, subd. (a) )

.2

The trial court properly denied the petition. This court has reviewed the entire

record and there are no meritorious issues to be argued.

The order is affirmed

.

_________________________ Rivera, J.

We concur:

_________________________ Reardon, Acting P.J.

_________________________ Streeter, J.