alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 34 93

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e ,

v.
Nath an Adam

Sm it h,

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ct of I owa - Des M oi ne s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Marc h 2 1, 2 01 7 Fi le d: Marc h 3 0, 2 01 7 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re RI LEY, A RNOLD, andCOLLOTON, Cir cu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

In th is di rect cri mi n a l a p pe al , Nath an Sm it h ch al le ng es th e di st ric t co ur t’s 1 be lo w-Gui de li ne s- ran ge se nt en ce im po se d f ol lo win g hi s gu il ty pl ea to ba nk frau d.

The Hon or ab le Jo hn A. Ja rv ey , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof I owa

.His co un se l ha s m ov ed to wit hd raw, an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r Ander s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , arg ui ng th at Sm it h’s se nt en ce is su bs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le be cau se th ere is un du e di sp ari ty be twee n Sm it h’s se nt en ce an d th e se nt en ces im po se d

on hi s co -d efen da nt s. In a su pp le m en ta l br ie f, Sm it h joi ns co un se l in ch al le ng in g th e
su bs ta nt iv e reas on ab le ne ss of hi s se nt en ce ba se d on th e m or e fav or ab le se nt en ces th at hi s co -d efen da nt s re cei ve d.

Hav in g care fu ll y rev ie wed th e di st ric t co ur t’s care fu l art ic ul at io n at se nt en ci ng of th e m ul ti pl e fact or s th at gu id ed th e co ur t in fas hi on in g an ap pr op ria te se nt en ce, we
co nc lu de th at th e se nt en ce i s n o t su bs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le

. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Mil le r , 57 F.3 d 91 0, 91 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ). Fu rth er, we ha ve rev ie wed t h e reco rd as req ui red by Pen so n v. Ohi o , 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d fin d no no nf riv ol ou s is su es fo r ap pe al

. A c c o r d i n g ly, we affi rm th e jud gm en t, an d we gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July 28, 2010 | /s/ James R. Baumgardner                    |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | James R. BaumgardnerChief Executive Officer |   |
|                           |                                        |   |
|                           | /s/ Jeffrey R. Feeler                       |   |
|                           | Jeffrey R. FeelerChief Financial Officer    |   |
EXHIBIT 99.2
                             ------------

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
R. Hughes, Jr., Treasurer, Clerk and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




/s/ Donald R. Hughes, Jr.
-------------------------
Donald R. Hughes, Jr.
Treasurer, Clerk and Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 12, 2003


_____________________________________________________________________________


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Community Bancorp,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                            JOINT REPORTING AGREEMENT

         In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, each of the
parties hereto represents to and agrees with the other parties as follows:

         1. Such party acknowledges that it is required and eligible to file a
statement on Schedule 13G pertaining to the common stock of East Texas Financial
Services, Inc. to which this agreement is an exhibit, for the filing of the
information contained therein.

         2. Such party is responsible for timely filing of such statement and
any amendments thereto, and for the completeness and accuracy of the information
concerning such party contained therein; provided that no such party is
responsible for the completeness or accuracy of the information concerning the
other party making the filing, unless such party knows or has reason to believe
that such information is inaccurate.

         3. Such party agrees that such statement is filed by and on behalf of
each such party and that any amendment thereto will be filed on behalf of each
such party.

         This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but all of such counterparts
taken together shall constitute but one agreement.


Dated:    March 1, 2001


                                      EAST TEXAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION


                                      By: /s/ Dean Bingham
                                      ------------------------------------
                                          Dean Bingham, Vice President



                                      /s/ Larry Thomas Long
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Larry Thomas Long


                                Page 9 of 9 Pages
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,510,549
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     137,599,448
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,152,369
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 19,633,074
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      20,401,097
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        20,069,216
<LOANS>                                    123,929,581
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,172,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             190,371,546
<DEPOSITS>                                 172,586,793
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,228,568
<LONG-TERM>                                    385,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,978,373
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,892,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             190,371,546
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,472,211
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,238,690
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               204,259
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,915,160
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,417,753
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,265
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,435,018
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,955,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,549,961
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,549,961
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   900,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.08
<LOANS-NON>                                    455,661
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,197,694
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   42,124
<RECOVERIES>                                    17,354
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,172,924
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,477,803
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        695,121
        

</TABLE>
No. 1,937.

#### In re LOGAN.

*Appeal from District Court, Flathead County; D. F. Smith, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided June 19, 1903.

*Mr. James Donovan,*for Appellant.

Pee Cueiam.

Upon motion of counsel for the appellant herein, this appeal is dismissed as settled.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of Intent.

# SUMMARY:

The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an environmental impact statement will not be prepared for the corridor extending from the intersection of Wisconsin Route 213 and Nye School Road northwest of Beloit, Rock County, Wisconsin to the interchange of Rockton Road and I–90 southeast of South Beloit, Winnebago County, Illinois.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Norman R. Stoner, P.E., Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, 3250 Executive Park Drive, Springfield, Illinois 62703, Phone: (217) 492–4600. George F. Ryan, P.E., Region Two Engineer, District 2, Illinois Department of Transportation, 819 Depot Avenue, Dixon, Illinois 61021, Phone: (815) 284–2271.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FHWA, in cooperation with the Illinois Department of Transportation, published a notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in the                     **Federal Register**                     dated October 26, 1995 (Volume 60, Number 207, pp. 54910–54911) to study a proposal to construct a highway on new alignment over a distance of approximately eight miles to better serve the transportation needs of the Beloit and Janesville Urbanized Areas.                

Due to public opposition, lack of regional support and a change in the conditions in the region that warranted the study, this project has been cancelled and no further project activities will occur.

Comments or questions concerning this notice should be directed to FHWA or the Illinois Department of Transportation at the addresses provided above.

Issued on: April 30, 2010.

Norman R. Stoner,

Division Administrator, Springfield, Illinois.

[FR Doc. 2010–10768 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Tower Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeff B. Shank, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Jeff  B. Shank |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | July 31, 2008            |

 

1

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 29, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 29, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0333. WM. MORGAN AKIN et al v. SCOTTY L. KEY et al. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV2023001445
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00698-CR

EBER MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 268th District Court of Fort Bend County.

(Tr. Ct. No. 12-DCR-060497).

TO THE 268TH DISTRICT COURT OF FORT BEND COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 7th day of October 2014, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on July 26, 2013. After submitting the case on 

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the 

parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains 

no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered October 7, 2014.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings 

and Keyes. Opinion delivered by Justice Keyes.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

February 27, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 6, 2010 

y0429 

Order 

 

May 6, 2010 

140219 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140219 

 COA: 287177 

Ottawa CC: 07-031561-FC 

BREN HAYDEN BUTLER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2065

To authorize the Attorney General to provide grants for organizations to

find missing adults.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 2000

Mr. EDWARDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To authorize the Attorney General to provide grants for

organizations to find missing adults.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Kristen’s Law’’.

5 SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR THE ASSISTANCE OF ORGANIZATIONS

6 TO FIND MISSING ADULTS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may make

8 grants to public agencies or nonprofit private organiza9 tions, or combinations thereof, for programs—
2

•S 2065 IS

1 (1) to assist law enforcement and families in lo2 cating missing adults;

3 (2) to maintain a national, interconnected data4 base for the purpose of tracking missing adults who

5 are determined by law enforcement to be endangered

6 due to age, diminished mental capacity, or the cir7 cumstances of disappearance, when foul play is sus8 pected or circumstances are unknown;

9 (3) to maintain statistical information of adults

10 reported as missing;

11 (4) to provide informational resources and re12 ferrals to families of missing adults;

13 (5) to assist in public notification and victim

14 advocacy related to missing adults; and

15 (6) to establish and maintain a national clear16 inghouse for missing adults.

17 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Attorney General may make

18 such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry

19 out this Act.

20 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

21 There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

22 this Act $1,000,000 each year for fiscal years 2001

23 through 2004.

Æ
# Military Spouse Appreciation Day, 2010 

When Americans answer the call to serve in our Armed Forces, a sacred trust is forged. Our men and women in uniform take on the duty of protecting us all, and their spouses and families also help shoulder this important responsibility. As we mark Military Spouse Appreciation Day, we reaffirm our steadfast commitment to supporting and honoring the husbands, wives, and loved ones of our Nation’s servicemembers.

At the heart of our Armed Forces, servicemembers’ spouses keep our military families on track. They balance family life, military life, and their careers—all while supporting other military families and giving back to their communities. Many have served in uniform themselves and, understanding the obligations involved, can provide unparalleled support. They are pillars of strength in their families, often celebrating their children’s life milestones while the other parent is away.

Military spouses also care for our wounded warriors and honor the memory of our Nation’s fallen heroes, including their own loved ones. They impact countless lives on military bases and in schools, places of worship, and neighborhoods across our Nation. Their contributions help protect our freedom by strengthening our communities and our servicemembers.

My Administration is committed to improving opportunities and quality of life for these brave spouses and families who know the separation and stress of war. We are increasing servicemembers’ compensation as well as funding for better housing, job training, counseling, outreach, and support for spouses and their families. We are also expanding our ground forces to reduce the strain of repeated deployments, and to give servicemembers more time with their loved ones.

There are many ways for each of us to show our appreciation for military spouses. Working through community-based organizations, workplaces, schools, and places of worship, we can help them support their families, establish or build a career, and address the unique challenges they face.

I am inspired every day by our men and women in uniform and their families. They are America’s greatest military asset, and my Administration is committed to fulfilling our obligations to them. Today, let us honor the spouses and families who support our servicemembers and, in doing so, help defend our Nation and preserve our liberty.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 7, 2010, as Military Spouse Appreciation Day. I call upon the people of the United States to honor military spouses with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. 2010–11327

Billing code 3195–W0–P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6611

JESSIE TRAYLOR, and the prisoners of Estill,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN MACKLENBERG, F.C.I. Marianna; WARDEN KNIGHT, F.C.I. 

Estill; FORSYTH, Camp Administrator Estill; J. A. KELLER, Region Director,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (0:21-cv-00798-BHH)

Submitted: October 25, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jessie Traylor, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6611 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jessie Traylor appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Traylor’s complaint filed pursuant 

to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 

(1971), based on his failure to serve process. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Traylor v. Macklenberg, 

No. 0:21-cv-00798-BHH (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6611 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2