alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26315-26316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11192]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6997]


In the Matter of the Designation of Nayif Bin-Muhammad al-Qahtani 
also known as Nayef Bin Muhammad al-Qahtani also known as Nayif 
Muhammad al-Qahtani also known as Nayf Mohammed al-Qahtani also known 
as Naif Mohammad Said al-Qahtani Alkodri also known as Naif Mohammed 
Saeed al-Kodari al-Qahtani also known as Nayef Bin Mohamed al-Khatani 
also known as Mohammed Naif al-Khatani also known as Nayef bin Mohamed 
al-Khatany also known as Al-Qahtani Abohemem also known as Abi Hamam 
also known as Abu-Hamam also known as Abu Humam also known as Abu 
Hammam also knows as al-Qahtani as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Nayif Bin-
Muhammad al-Qahtani and also known as Nayef Bin Muhammad al-Qahtani, 
also known as Nayif Muhammad al-Qahtani, also known as Nayf Mohammed 
al-Qahtani, also known as Naif Mohammad Said al-Qahtani Alkodri, also 
known as Naif Mohammed Saeed al-Kodari al-Qahtani, also known as Nayef 
Bin Mohamed al-Khatani, also known as Mohammed Naif al-Khatani, also 
known as Nayef bin Mohamed al-Khatany, also known as Al-Qahtani 
Abohemem, also known as Abi Hamam, also known as Abu-Hamam, also known 
as Abu-Humam, also known as Abu-Hammam, also known as Abu Hammam al-
Qahtani committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of 
terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national 
security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render

[[Page 26316]]

ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

     Dated: April 6, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State,
    Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-11192 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12149 and #12150]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi (FEMA–1906–DR), dated 04/29/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         04/23/2010 through 04/24/2010.                    

*Effective Date:*                         05/01/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/28/2010.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/29/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Mississippi, dated 04/29/2010, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Attala, Holmes.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010–11053 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
NO. 12-09-00208-CR

NO. 12-09-00209-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

GARRY STEVEN ALBRIGHT, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

These appeals are being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. After entering a guilty plea

in each case, Appellant was convicted of “accident involving injury/death” and “intoxicated

assault with a vehicle causing serious bodily injury.” Sentence in each case was imposed on

May 6, 2009.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice

of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court

unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX.R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Where a timely motion

for new trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the sentence

is imposed or suspended in open court. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Appellant did not file a

motion for new trial in either case. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due on or before June 5,

2009. However, Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until July 9, 2009 and did not file a

motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal as permitted by Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 26.3. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3 (appellate court may extend time for filing notice of

appeal if, within fifteen days after deadline for filing notice of appeal, appellant files notice of

appeal in trial court and motion complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) in

appellate court).
2

On July 10, 2009, this court notified Appellant that his notice of appeal was untimely and

that there was no timely motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal as permitted

by rule 26.3. Appellant was further informed that the appeals would be dismissed unless, on or

before July 20, 2009, the information filed in these appeals was amended to show the jurisdiction

of this court. On July 17, 2009, Appellant responded to this court’s notice. However, he did not

furnish information establishing this court’s jurisdiction.

Because this court has no authority to allow the late filing of a notice of appeal except

as provided by rule 26.3, the appeals must be dismissed. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208,

210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered July 31, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August                13, 2008 |   | /s/                Jonathan J. Martin                                                                                                                                                                             |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                           |   | Jonathan                J. MartinPresident,                Principal Executive Officer, PrincipalFinancial                Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,Chairman                of the Board of Directors |

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of B&D Food Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2008 (the “Report”), I,
      Daniel Ollech, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ Daniel Ollech**Daniel Ollech**
              **Chief Financial Officer**




November
      19, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, I, the undersigned
Chief  Financial Officer of American Ecology Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify,  based  on  my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for  the  period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934  and  that  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ James R. Baumgardner
------------------------
James R. Baumgardner
November 4, 2004


<PAGE>
> 
**United States****Securities and Exchange Commission    Washington, D.C. 20549**

**Form 10-Q**

(Mark One)

[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

**For the Period Ended July 29, 2005**

or

[   ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Transition Period from ___________________to ____________________.

Commission file number 0-21236

  

| **Applied Signal Technology, Inc.**(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **California**(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)                                                                                                                                                               | **77-0015491**(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| **400 West California Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086****(408) 749-1888**(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable        (Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |

> 
  

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

| X       |   |
|---------|--------|
| **Yes** | **No** |

> 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

| X       |   |
|---------|--------|
| **Yes** | **No** |

> 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

|    | X      |
|---------|--------|
| **Yes** | **No** |

> 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common Stock, no par value, 11,490,920 shares outstanding as of July 29, 2005.

----

**Index	**
#### Ward, By, et al. v. Ward, et al.

(Decided April 12, 1911.)

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1. The deed of an infant cannot be avoided where he accepts the consideration after he is of age, and sells it.

2. A deed will not be set aside on the ground that it was obtained by undue influence when it was acquiesced in by the grantor during his life, and was first complained of after his death, more than five years after it was made.

J. S. CLINE for appellant.

P. W. STOWERS for appellee.

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

ChIEE JUSTICE HOBSON.

On February 4, 1894, John W. Ward purchased from Frank Abshire a small tract of 25 or 30 acres of land for $45.00 which he paid; and had Abshire to execute a deed to his infant son S. B. Ward. The purchase was of only the surface, the mineral having been previously sold by Abshire. S. B. Ward, on January 17, 1903, conveyed the land to his father. He became of age July 13, 1903, having married some months before that. He died on August 23, 1908, and on January 27, 1909, this action was brought by his infant children against their grandfather to set aside the deed which their father had made to.him in January 1903, on the ground that their father w’as an infant when he executed the deed, and that the deed was obtained from him in this way: that he wished to get married: that his father refused to give his consent to his marriage unless he deeded him the land, and that he executed the deed to obtain his father’s certificate so that he could get the marriage license. Proof was taken and on final hearing the circuit court dismissed the petition. The plaintiffs appeal.

*92There is no doubt from the record that S. B. Ward was an infant when he made the deed to his father, bnt it also clearly appears that he became of age in July following ; that his father did not pay him in money for the land, bnt gave him a cow which he took for it, and allowed him to remain at his father’s; that after he was of age, he sold the cow to another and collected from him the purchase money $40.00. While an infant may avoid his deed made during infancy, he may ratify it after becoming of age; and where, as here, after he became of age, he received the cow and sold her, his subsequent ratification of the transaction is as effective as if he had then made a new deed. (Damron v. Ratliffe, 123 Ky. 758; Craig v. Van Bebber, 18 Am. St. Rep. 715 and note.)

S. P. Ward lived more than five years after he became . of age, and after he had ratified the transaction. He at no time took any step to set aside the deed or complained of it in any way. Pie lived not far from his father, and knew all the facts. When he died his canse of action to avoid the deed on the ground that it was obtained from him by fraud or duress was barred by limitation. The circuit court properly refused to disturb the deed after his death under such circumstances on the proof now made.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.185


                                   DEMAND NOTE

$400,000.00                                                   New York, New York
                                                                November 6, 2000

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Four Hundred
Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($400,000.00), together with interest on the unpaid
principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time from the date
hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest plus 3.0%, or
the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                       Wilshire Technologies, Inc.



                                       By: /s/ Kathleen Terry
                                       Name:  Kathleen E. Terry
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 26748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11241]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER10-1171-000]


Bluco Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

May 5, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Bluco Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 25, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92d4d7c0d1ddfcfefbfcf7c1e7e2e2fde0e6d2f4f7e0f1bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d2b283f2e2203010403083e181d1d021f192d0b081f0e430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11241 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>