alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         I, John M. Hickey, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Apex Resources
Group, Inc., (the "Company");

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
     quarterly report is being prepared;

          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
     and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(5) The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the
Company's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

          (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to
     record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
     for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
     and



<PAGE>



          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
     controls; and

(6) The Company's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 7, 2003        By: /s/
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 John M. Hickey, Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2113 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2113

  To provide wage parity for certain Department of Defense prevailing 
                       rate employees in Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2000

  Mr. Cleland introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide wage parity for certain Department of Defense prevailing 
                       rate employees in Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAGE PARITY FOR CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EMPLOYEES IN 
              GEORGIA.

    The wage schedules and rates applicable to prevailing rate 
employees (as defined in section 5342 of title 5, United States Code) 
of the Department of Defense in the Macon, Georgia, wage area shall be 
the same as the wage schedules and rates applicable to prevailing rate 
employees of the Department of Defense in the Atlanta, Georgia, wage 
area.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 1 shall take effect beginning with the first pay period 
beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 89 (Monday, May 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 25886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10932]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:
    Name: Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences (1171).
    Date/Time: May 20, 2010; 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. May 21, 2010; 8:30 
a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Stafford 
I, Room 1235, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Ms. Lisa Jones, Office of the Assistant Director, 
Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 905, Arlington, 
Virginia 22230, 703-292-8700.
    Summary of Minutes: May be obtained from contact person listed 
above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation on major goals and policies pertaining to 
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate programs and 
activities.
    Agenda:
    Thursday, May 20, 2010
    Updates and discussions on continuing activities.
     Budget priorities for FY 2011.
     SBE Future Directions.
    AC Report Planning for SBE Future.
    Discussion with NSF Director and Deputy Director.
    Friday, May 21, 2010
    Updates and discussion on continuing activities.
     SLC.
     International Engagement.
    Open Discussion.
    Planning for FY 2011 and Beyond.

    Dated: May 4, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-10932 Filed 5-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2150

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain other single

yarn of viscose rayon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. HOLLINGS (for himself and Mr. THURMOND) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend through December 31, 2004, the duty on certain

other single yarn of viscose rayon.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.xx.xx Other yarn, single: Of viscose rayon, untwisted or

with a twist not exceeding

120 turns/m-Monofilament;

multifilament, untwisted or

with twist of less than 5

turns per meter (provided

for in subheading

5403.31.00.20) .................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.
2

•S 2150 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to

3 goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consump4 tion, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Form 10-K of American TonerServ Corp., a company
duly formed under the laws of Delaware (the "Company"), for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), Ryan Vice, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of his/her knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



March 31, 2009                        /s/ Ryan Vice
                                      Ryan Vice
                                      Principal Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American TonerServ Corp. and will be retained by American TonerServ
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1876

To amend the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 to require a report

to Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 5, 1999

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To amend the High–Performance Computing Act of 1991

to require a report to Congress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Science and Edu5 cational Networking Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

7 Section 103 of the High-Performance Computing Act

8 of 1991 (15 U.S.C. 5513) is amended by redesignating

9 subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (c), (d), and
2

•S 1876 IS

1 (e), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (a) the

2 following new subsection:

3 ‘‘(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—

4 ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Director of the Na5 tional Science Foundation shall submit to Congress,

6 not later than December 31, 2001, a report that ad7 dresses the issues described in paragraph (3) and in8 cludes recommendations to address the issues identi9 fied in the report.

10 ‘‘(2) CONSULTATION.—In preparing the report

11 under paragraph (1), the Director of the National

12 Science Foundation shall consult with the National

13 Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National

14 Institute of Standards and Technology, and such

15 other Federal agencies and other education entities

16 as the Director of the National Science Foundation

17 considers appropriate.

18 ‘‘(3) ISSUES.—The report shall—

19 ‘‘(A) identify the current status of high20 speed, large bandwidth capacity access to all

21 public elementary and secondary schools and li22 braries in the United States;

23 ‘‘(B) identify how high-speed large band24 width capacity access to the Internet to such
3

•S 1876 IS

1 schools and libraries can be effectively utilized

2 within each school and library;

3 ‘‘(C) consider the effect that specific or re4 gional circumstances may have on the ability of

5 such institutions to acquire high-speed, large

6 bandwidth capacity to achieve universal

7 connectivity as an effective tool in the education

8 process; and

9 ‘‘(D) include options and recommendations

10 for the various entities responsible for elemen11 tary and secondary education to address the

12 challenges and issues identified in the report.’’.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2037

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the option to

use rebased target amounts to all sole community hospitals.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 7, 2000

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. HELMS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend

the option to use rebased target amounts to all sole

community hospitals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sole Community Hos5 pital Fair Payment Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF OPTION TO USE REBASED TARGET

7 AMOUNTS TO ALL SOLE COMMUNITY HOS8 PITALS.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(b)(3)(I)(i) of the

10 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(I)(i)) (as
2

•S 2037 IS

1 added by section 405 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and

2 SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999, as en3 acted into law by section 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106–

4 113) is amended—

5 (1) in the matter preceding subclause (I)—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘for its cost reporting pe7 riod beginning during 1999 is paid on the basis

8 of the target amount applicable to the hospital

9 under subparagraph (C) and that’’; and

10 (B) by striking ‘‘such target amount’’ and

11 inserting ‘‘the target amount otherwise applica12 ble to the hospital under subparagraph (C) (re13 ferred to in this clause as the ‘subparagraph

14 (C) target amount’)’’; and

15 (2) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘target amount

16 otherwise applicable’’ and all that follows through

17 ‘‘target amount’)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (C)

18 target amount’’.

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply as if included in the enactment

21 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget

22 Refinement Act of 1999, as enacted into law by section

23 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106–113.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Melanie D. Horton

Appellate case number: 01-21-00324-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-39175

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Relator, Melanie D. Horton, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. The Court 

requests a response to the petition from the real party in interest, Kafi, Inc. The response, 

if any, is due to be filed with this Court no later than twenty days of the date of this 

order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Amparo Guerra_____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __July 1, 2021____
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7705

LUIS ROSARIO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOCTOR UMESI, Doctor in Wake County Jail; SERGEANT LONG, Staff Member, Wake County Jail; MR. PONCELET, Staff Member, Wake County Jail,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

DONNIE HARRISON, Wake County Sherif f; MR. GUNTER, Wake County Jail Director; WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03171-BO)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luis Rosario, Appellant Pro Se. John Albert Maxfield, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

Luis Rosario appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Rosario v. Wake County Sheriff’s Office , No. 5:07-ct03171-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First McMinnville Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenny D. Neal, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Kenny D. Neal
--------------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2005
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-13634

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DESHUNQUEZ ALEXANDER HARRIS, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cr-00165-LSC-JTA-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 23-13634 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 04/23/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-13634

Before WILSON, LUCK, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. 

See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1351 (11th Cir. 1993) 

(sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly 

and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd, 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 

2020) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced where “it was 

clearly conveyed to the defendant that he was giving up his right 

to appeal under most circumstances” (quotation marks and brackets 

omitted)); see also United States v. Howle, 166 F.3d 1166, 1169 (11th 

Cir. 1999) (a sentence appeal waiver waives difficult and debatable 

legal issues, including even blatant error); United States v. Bascomb, 

451 F.3d 1292, 1296–97 (11th Cir. 2006) (an appeal waiver may 

include a waiver of constitutional claims).

USCA11 Case: 23-13634 Document: 25-1 Date Filed: 04/23/2024 Page: 2 of 2
| (1)   | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company              for the periods reflected therein. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: September 6, 2006 | /s/ Stuart              Hettleman                                                                                               |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Stuart Hettleman                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                           |
|                    |                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                    | /s/ Philip J.              Dubato                         |
|                    | Philip J. Dubato                                                                                                                                                                  |
|                    | Chief Financial              Officer                                                                                                                                              |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10350 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus STEVEN SHAWN TYSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:96-CR-53-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 20, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Steven Shawn Tyson appeals his sentence following his conviction for mailing a threatening communication, 18 U.S.C. § 876. He argues that the district court erred by failing to award him a downward adjustment in his offense level based upon acceptance of responsibility. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and we hold that the district court did not clearly err in its determination that Tyson’s conduct did not merit the acceptance-of-responsibility adjustment. See United States v. Watson , 988 F.2d 544, 551 (5th Cir. 1993).No. 98-10350 -2-
AFFIRMED.
No. 1,711.

#### ROBINSON, Appellant, *v.*JOHNSON, Respondent.

*Appeal from District Court, LeuJs & Clarice County; Sydney II. Mclntire, Judge.*

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Decided October 14, 1902.

*Messrs. McConnell & McConnell,*for Appellant,

Per Curiam.

— Upon- motion of counsel for 1he appellant herein, this appeal is dismissed.