alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2002

For the relief of Tony Lara.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 24, 2000

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Tony Lara.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR TONY

4 LARA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Tony Lara shall be eligible for issuance of an immi8 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

12 permanent resident.
2

•S 2002 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Tony Lara enters

2 the United States before the filing deadline specified in

3 subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered and

4 remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligi5 ble for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment

7 of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

12 fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of this

13 Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Guy Taylor, the Secretary of State shall instruct

17 the proper officer to reduce by one, during the current

18 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi19 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun20 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi21 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total

22 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na23 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

24 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2017

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income

payments made to tobacco quota and allotment holders and tobacco

growers pursuant to Phase I or II of the Master Settlement Agreement

between a State and tobacco product manufacturers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 31, 2000

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

from gross income payments made to tobacco quota and

allotment holders and tobacco growers pursuant to Phase

I or II of the Master Settlement Agreement between

a State and tobacco product manufacturers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 2017 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR PAY2 MENTS MADE TO TOBACCO QUOTA AND AL3 LOTMENT HOLDERS AND TOBACCO GROWERS

4 PURSUANT TO PHASE I OR II OF THE MASTER

5 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap7 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

8 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended

9 by redesignating section 139 as section 140 and by insert10 ing after section 138 the following:

11 ‘‘SEC. 139. CERTAIN PAYMENTS TO TOBACCO QUOTA AND

12 ALLOTMENT HOLDERS AND TOBACCO GROW13 ERS.

14 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income shall not include

15 any tobacco settlement payment.

16 ‘‘(b) TOBACCO SETTLEMENT PAYMENT.—For pur17 poses of subsection (a), the term ‘tobacco settlement pay18 ment’ means any payment to any person if—

19 ‘‘(1) the payment is made to such person by

20 reason of—

21 ‘‘(A) such person holding a tobacco mar22 keting quota, or tobacco farm acreage allot23 ment, under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of

24 1938, or
3

•S 2017 IS

1 ‘‘(B) such person having the right to grow

2 tobacco pursuant to such a quota or allotment,

3 and

4 ‘‘(2) such payment is received directly or indi5 rectly pursuant to Phase I or II of the Master Set6 tlement Agreement between a State and tobacco

7 product manufacturers and signed on November 23,

8 1998.’’.

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

10 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal

11 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the last

12 item and inserting the following:

‘‘Sec. 139. Certain payments to tobacco quota and allotment holders and tobacco growers.

‘‘Sec. 140. Cross references to other Acts.’’.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

15 December 31, 1998.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2145

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain imaging chemicals.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain imaging

chemicals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by striking headings 9902.29.38, 9902.29.39,

7 and 9902.29.40 and inserting in numerical sequence the

8 following new headings:

‘‘ 9902.29.38 3,5-Pyridinedicarboxylic acid,

1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-

diphenyl-, dimethyl ester

(CAS No. 83300-85-0) (provided for in subheading

2933.90.79) .......................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004
2

•S 2145 IS

9902.29.39 2-[2-[2-chloro-3[(1,3-

dihydro-1,3,3-trimethyl-2Hindol-2-ylidene) ethylidene]-

1-cyclopenten-1-yl]ethenyl]-

1,3,3-trimethyl-3H-indolium,

salt with

trifluoromethanesulfonic acid

(1:1) (CAS No. 128433-68-

1) (provided for in subheading 2933.90.79) ............ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004

9902.29.40 Methanaminium, N-[4-[5-[4-

(dimethyl- amino)phenyl]-

1,5-diphenyl-2,4-

pentadienylidene ]-2,5-

cyclohexadien-1-ylidene]-Nmethyl-, salt with

trifluoromethanesulfonic acid

(1:1) (CAS No. 100237-71-

6) (provided for in subheading 2921.49.45) ............ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of

5 this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 89 (Monday, May 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 25845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2010-OS-0062]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Information Systems Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Information Systems Agency proposes to delete a 
system of records notice in its existing inventory of record systems 
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
June 9, 2010 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jeanette M. Weathers-Jenkins at 
(703) 681-2103.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Information Systems Agency 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the Defense Information Systems Agency, 5600 Columbia 
Pike, Room 933-I, Falls Church, VA 22041-2705.
    The Defense Information Systems Agency proposes to delete one 
system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject 
to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed 
deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a 
new or altered system report.

    Dated: May 4, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletion:
KEUR.04

System name:
    Security Clearance File (February 22, 1993; 58 FR 10562).

Reason:
    These records are covered under system of records notice V5-05, 
Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS) (July 1, 2005; 70 FR 38120), 
therefore it can be deleted.

[FR Doc. 2010-10939 Filed 5-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0466 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. CHRISTOPHER HORN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 15, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 9 2024

04/09/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0466
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 177

For the relief of Donald C. Pence.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

For the relief of Donald C. Pence.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF OF DONALD C. PENCE.

4 (a) RELIEF.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

5 pay, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, to Donald C. Pence, of Sanford, North Caro7 lina, the sum of $31,128 in compensation for the failure

8 of the Department of Veterans Affairs to pay dependency

9 and indemnity compensation to Kathryn E. Box, the now10 deceased mother of Donald C. Pence, for the period begin11 ning on July 1, 1990, and ending on March 31, 1993.
2

•S 177 IS

1 (b) LIMITATION ON FEES.—Not more than a total

2 of 10 percent of the payment authorized by subsection (a)

3 shall be paid to or received by agents or attorneys for serv4 ices rendered in connection with obtaining such payment,

5 any contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person

6 who violates this subsection shall be fined not more than

7 $1,000.

Æ
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

s0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140659

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140659 COA: 285473 Wayne CC: 07-014628-FC MICHAEL ANTONIO DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7387 

JERRY EUGENE COLEMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.

(CA-04-305-7)

Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 23, 2004

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Eugene Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances Whalen,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Eugene Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief without prejudice on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

July 15, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on

August 20, 2004. Because Coleman failed to file a timely notice of

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period,

we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2002 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2002

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
                      For the relief of Tony Lara.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR TONY LARA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Tony Lara shall be eligible 
for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 
of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 
Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Tony Lara enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment 
of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Tony Lara, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6807** 

KENNETH BRYANT , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. MARIE VARGO, Warden; TERRA MOORE, Medical Administrator; S. HICKS, Registered Nurse; CORIZON , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00294

- CMH

- TCB )

Submitted : September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kenneth Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Bryant appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failure to notify the court of his change of address. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Because Bryant may proceed with his claims by filing another compla int and providing an accurate address, the order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order with respect to those claims nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 44TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 29th day of July, 2014, the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

BEECH STREET CORPORATION, Appellant

No. 05

- 12

- 01671

- CV V.

BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District
Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 04919

- B. Opinion delivered by Justice O'Neill. Justices Myers and Brown participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM recover its costs of this appeal and the full amount of the trial court’s judgment from appellant BEE CH STREET CORPORATION and from Westchester Fire Insurance Company as surety on appellant’s supersedeas bond.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed a nd executed.– 2

–

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City o f Dallas, this 26th day of May, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2001

To protect the Social Security and Medicare surpluses by requiring a

sequester to eliminate any deficit.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 24, 2000

Mr. GRAMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on

the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instrucitons that if one Committee reports, the other committee has thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To protect the Social Security and Medicare surpluses by

requiring a sequester to eliminate any deficit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security and

5 Medicare Surplus Protection Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. SEQUESTER TO PROTECT THE SOCIAL SECURITY

7 AND MEDICARE SURPLUSES.

8 Section 251 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency

9 Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901) is amended

10 by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 2001 RIS

1 ‘‘(d) SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE SURPLUS

2 PROTECTION SEQUESTER.—

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Within 15 calendar days

4 after Congress adjourns to end a session and on the

5 same day as a sequestration (if any) under sub6 section (a), section 252, and section 253, there shall

7 be a sequestration to eliminate any on-budget deficit

8 (excluding any surplus in the Social Security Trust

9 Funds and the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust

10 Fund).

11 ‘‘(2) ELIMINATING DEFICIT.—The sequester re12 quired by this subsection shall be applied in accord13 ance with the procedures set forth in subsection (a).

14 The on-budget deficit shall not be subject to adjust15 ment for any purpose.’’.

16 SEC. 3. SAME PERCENTAGE REDUCTION APPLICABLE TO

17 PAY FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—In determining rates of pay for

19 service performed in any fiscal year beginning after Sep20 tember 30, 2000, the rate of pay for a Member of Con21 gress shall be determined as if the pay adjustment for that

22 fiscal year had resulted in a rate equal to—

23 (1) the rate of pay that would otherwise have

24 taken effect for the position involved beginning in
3

•S 2001 RIS

1 that fiscal year (if this section had not been en2 acted), reduced by

3 (2) the same percentage as any reduction made

4 as a result of the operation of section 251(d) of the

5 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control

6 Act of 1985, as added by section 2.

7 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

8 (1) the term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ refers to

9 any position under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of

10 section 601(a)(1) of the Legislative Reorganization

11 Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(1) (A)–(C)); and

12 (2) the term ‘‘fiscal year pay adjustment’’

13 means the adjustment in rates of pay scheduled to

14 take effect in a fiscal year under section 601(a)(2)

15 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2

16 U.S.C. 31(2)).

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, I, the undersigned
Chief  Executive Officer of American Ecology Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certify,  based  on  my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company  for  the  period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934  and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Stephen A. Romano
---------------------
Stephen A. Romano
July 29, 2005