alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11

Computation of Earnings per Share
(dollars in thousands, except shares and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                               For the Six Months      For the Three Months
                                    ended June 30             ended June 30
                                  1998       1997           1998       1997
<S>                         <C>         <C>            <C>        <C>
PRIMARY:
 
Average shares outstanding  4,052,514   4,052,514      4,052,514  4,052,514
 
Impact of Treasury Shares      31,189      17,838         37,672     18,161
                            ---------   ---------      ---------  ---------
Total                       3,994,172   4,018,207      3,992,129  4,011,075
                            =========   =========      =========  =========
 
Net Income                    $ 3,363     $ 3,093        $ 1,665    $ 1,555
                              =======     =======        =======    =======
 
Preferred Stock Dividends     $   585     $   706        $   290    $   394
                              =======     =======        =======    =======
Net Income Available to
Common Shareholders           $ 2,778     $ 2,387        $ 1,375    $ 1,161
                              =======     =======        =======    =======
Earnings Per Share
Applicable to Common Stock       $.70        $.59           $.35       $.29
                                =====       =====          =====      =====

</TABLE>
#### John Lackner, Judgment Creditor, *v.*Milton Abrams, Judgment Debtor.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

July 8, 1936.

*Reiss & Reiss,*for the judgment creditor.

*I. Jonas Speciner,*for the judgment debtor.

McLaughlin (Chables B.), J.

A judgment debtor was ordered to pay ten dollars per week on account of a judgment of $111. He is ostensibly working for a corporation owned by his wife at a salary of ten dollars per week. The court had no hesitancy in finding that to be a subterfuge. He insists that he is not in contempt. Section 793 of the Civil Practice Act should not be used to re-establish in our law imprisonment for debt, but when a debtor adopts such a transparent ruse as this he is not being imprisoned for nonpayment of a debt which he cannot pay. He is being punished for flouting the court. Imprisonment for debt would never have been abolished if it had been resorted to only in cases where refusal to pay was accompanied with ability to pay. That is not the situation here. The order of this court has been willfully disobeyed. The defendant is fined the sum of $111. He may purge himself by making all payments now overdue under the order of Mr. Justice Hammeb, within ten days from date of service of notice of entry of the order .to be entered hereon. Settle order.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mexican Restaurants, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending January 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Curt Glowacki, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
            78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Curt Glowacki

Curt Glowacki
Chief Executive Officer
April 5, 2005

The foregoing certification is being forwarded solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11

Computation of Earnings per Share
(dollars in thousands, except shares and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                                  For the Six Months              For the Three Months
                                                                     ended June 30                    ended June 30

                                                                1997             1996              1997             1996
<S>                                                           <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>
PRIMARY:                                                                  
                                                                          
Average shares outstanding                                    3,684,104        3,684,104         3,684,104        3,684,104
                                                                          
Impact of Treasury Shares                                        31,189           17,838            37,672           18,161
                                                              ---------        ---------         ---------        ---------
Total                                                         3,652,915        3,666,266         3,646,432        3,665,943
                                                              =========        =========         =========        =========
                                                                          
Net Income                                                    $   3,093        $   3,016         $   1,555        $   1,707
                                                              =========        =========         =========        =========
                                                                                                     
Preferred Stock Dividends                                     $     706        $     492         $     394        $     376
                                                              =========        =========         =========        =========
Net Income Available to                                                                              
Common Shareholders                                           $   2,387        $   2,524         $   1,161        $   1,331
                                                              =========        =========         =========        =========
Earnings Per Share
Applicable to Common Stock                                         $.65             $.69              $.32             $.36 
                                                              =========        =========         =========        =========
</TABLE>
Third Amendment to Exclusive License Agreement, dated July 19, 2007



 Exhibit 10.6 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT 
 This Third Amendment is made and entered into as of July 19, 2007 (the “Third Amendment Effective Date”) by and between THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, a body corporate, having its principal office at 201 Regent
Hall, Regent Drive, Boulder, CO 80309 (hereinafter “University”) and ARCA Discovery, Inc., a Delaware corporation having its principal office at 1200 17th Street, Suite 620, Denver, CO 80202 (hereinafter “Licensee”). 
 WITNESSETH

 WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Exclusive License Agreement on October 14, 2005 (the “License
Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the License Agreement was subsequently amended on June 23, 2006 and July 20, 2006; and

 WHEREAS, the July 20, 2006 amendment granted Licensee a one year option for an exclusive license to, among others, the ERK1/2
Patent Rights owned by University; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the License Agreement to extend the option period
for the ERK1/2 Patent Rights to August 20, 2007; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 
 ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 
  

	1.01	Any defined terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the License Agreement. 

 ARTICLE 2. EXTENSION OF OPTION 
  

	2.01	The License Agreement is hereby amended to extend Licensee’s exclusive option to license the ERK1/2 Patent Rights (University Case Number CU1403H) to August 20, 2007.


 ARTICLE 3. MISCELLANEOUS 
  

	3.01	Except as expressly amended by this Third Amendment, all provisions of the License Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

	3.02	This Third Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. 

  

 1 of 2 









	3.03	The provisions and clauses of this Third Amendment are severable, and in the event that any provision or clause is determined to be invalid or unenforceable under any controlling
body of the law, such invalidity or unenforceability will not in any way affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining provisions and clauses hereof. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment, which is effective on the Second Amendment Effective Date, to be executed in
duplicate by their respective duly authorized officers. 
  

									
	UNIVERSITY:	 		 	LICENSEE:
			
	The Regents of the University of Colorado	 		 	ARCA Discovery, Inc.
					
	By:	 	David Allen	 		 	By:	 	Christopher Ozeroff
	Title:	 	Assoc. V.P., Technology Transfer	 		 	Title:	 	EVP Business Development & GC
	Date:	 	August 17, 2007	 		 	Date:	 	August 13, 2007

  

 2 of 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D A N I EL H A RPER, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. SG T. CO STA ; M EN D ES, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 16988 D. C . No . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 2 1 4 9 - L KK DA D ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a w r e nc e K . K ar l t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t10, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , H A W K IN S , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D ani elH arper, a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g th a t d e f e n d an ts v io la te dh is c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts b yis s u in g h im af a ls e d is c ip lin aryv io la tio n . W e



# FI LED AU G 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16988 2 h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . Se rra v . L a p p in , 6 0 0 F. 3 d1 1 9 1 , 1 1 9 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 0 ) . W e a f f i rm. H a rpe r ’ s a c t i on w a s pr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d be c aus e hi s di s c i pl i naryvi ol a t i on, a nd the a s s oc i a t e d pe na l t i e s , w e r e r e ve r s e d thr ough the pr i s on’ s a dm i ni s tr a t i ve ap p e a l p r o c e du r e , a n db e c au s e H arp e rd idn o t a lle g e f a c ts s u g g e s tin g th a t h is r e s u ltin g a d m in is tr a tiv e s e g r e g a tio n im p o s e da n a typ ic a l an ds ig n if ic an t h ar d s h ip . See R a m i rez v. G a la za , 3 3 4 F . 3 d8 5 0 , 8 6 0 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) (u n d er th e D u e P ro cess C l aus e , apr i s one rm a yc ha l l e nge as t a t e di s c i pl i narya c t i on onl yi f i t“ de pr i ve s or re stra i ns a s t at e- cr eat ed l i berty i nt er es ti n som e ‘ un expect ed m anner’ ” or “ i m po se s som e ‘ atypi ca l and si gn i fi canthardshi p o n the i nm at e i n rel at i on t o the ordi nary i nc i de nt s of

pr i s on l i f

e ’ ” ( quot i ng Sandi n v . C onnor , 51 5 U . S . 47 2, 48 4 (19 95 )) . H arper’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2153 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2153

            To suspend temporarily the duty on cobalt boron.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

 Mr. Hollings (for himself and Mr. Thurmond) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on cobalt boron.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:
    

``             9902.xx.xx     Cobalt boron       Free        No change        No change       On or before
                               (provided for in                                                12/31/2004
                               subheading
                               8105.10.30).....
 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MARCUS HENDERSON,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 358, 2022

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 1601006965 (S)

§ 

§

Submitted: October 11, 2022

Decided: November 15, 2022

ORDER

On September 23, 2022, the appellant, Marcus Henderson, filed a letter that 

was deemed an appeal of the Superior Court’s August 17, 2022 order denying 

Henderson’s motion for sentence modification. A timely notice of appeal was due 

by September 16, 2022.1 The Senior Court Clerk issued, by certified mail, a notice 

directing Henderson to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as 

untimely filed. On September 30, 2022, the Court received the certified mail receipt 

indicating that the notice to show cause had been delivered on September 28, 2022. 

A timely response to the notice to show cause was due by October 10, 2022. To 

date, Henderson has not responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal of this

appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.

1 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iii).
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Y?hml*ttw hox-bto*ttao&~ ia the ma*. 

rd.lrs. to Lr with 

%a 

01 when tha audlter and I 

obw yo5 yaota It wao drafted by the, au<or that II* witH'm, an4 I aa pcwmtln~ it 

jwt l&k4 hb wmtib it *Inor E Qo not kaow wh8 

the C~~~b&ia~r'a Qaart to16 hh to fin4 out. 

*Am ha tald you In penon, both the (1) 

Dookbto es the, var10w courtb ane tha (It) mm+ 

iff'. RbljQrDb .~ 0hQwtbat la lwa the ClokiAtr Attommy &f Rkyette .Copmtp' l otkmll+ ear& km4 

than &S.llGO. barnod uimn s+ePr mtbbd of cntoalab 

umer the gwtr Btatea hare it i8 aer opinion 

that the "aaraad 8e3qwnsatlmaw (tmborth* Ofiiaaat Salary 

Law) of the Ctttaety Attoraay of hyatta Camty for #a fitteal 

yaar 1888 wu in exeem of $S 800.00. lt i8 oar Sawthor 

eplo$oa ondor the fbot8 otad that itlm tha aarbdatory 

duty of the Cald.m8ianars* Court of Ybyatta county to aat 

the u&am of th. tbufhtiy AttOraay Of YwttO COrmty at 

u,ao8.00 pu aunt% 

very tnalr yours
#### SECKERSON v. SINCLAIR.

(140 N. W. 239.)

Opinion filed November 20, 1912.

Rehearing denied January 7, 1913.

Motions by respondent to dismiss tbe appeal and also to vacate an order made by a-judge of this court permitting a supersedeas undertaking on appeal to be given.

First motion denied and second motion granted.

*Garr & Kneeland*and *8. E.*Ellsworth, for respondent.

*Knauf & Knwuf,*for appellant.

Per Curiam.

Tbe motions in tbe case at bar present tbe same questions that were just decided by us in tbe case of Burger v. Sinclair [next case] 140 N. W. 235, and tbe decision in tbat case controls tbis. Tbe same order will accordingly be made herein, with tbe exception tbat no costs are allowed.

Goss, L, being disqualified, did not participate.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1794 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1794

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the Federal courthouse at 145 East Simpson Avenue in 
   Jackson, Wyoming, as the ``Clifford P. Hansen Federal Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CLIFFORD P. HANSEN FEDERAL COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal courthouse at 145 East Simpson Avenue in Jackson, 
Wyoming, shall be known and designated as the ``Clifford P. Hansen 
Federal Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal courthouse referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clifford P. Hansen 
Federal Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of Cadence Financial Corporation (the Corporation) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lewis F. Mallory, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Lewis F. Mallory, Jr.Name:

Lewis F. Mallory, Jr.Title:

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

November 8, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence
Financial Corporation and will be retained by Cadence Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

J.P.W., JR., 

 Respondent 

 v. 

A.N.H., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 465 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of January, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, May 25, 2010, 2:30 p.m. to May 25, 2010, 4 p.m., Courtyard Marriott Tysons Corner, 1960–A Chain Bridge Road, McLean, VA 22102 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 30, 2010, 75 FR 22819.                

The meeting was cancelled due to administration problems.

Dated: May 4, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010–11046 Filed 5–10–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140–01–P