alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     financial  statements of Amscan Holdings,  Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001024729
<NAME>                        AMSCAN HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                                849
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      63,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (6,172)
<INVENTORY>                                        59,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  128,740
<PP&E>                                            104,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (42,877)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    263,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              46,512
<BONDS>                                           266,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (88,529)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      263,487
<SALES>                                           306,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  306,112
<CGS>                                             193,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     193,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   68,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    2,906
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 26,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    17,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                        7,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                10,207
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       10,207
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.00


</TABLE>
we are concerned by petitioner's contention that his motion has been

pending for almost ten months, we trust that the district court will resolve the matters pending before it as promptly as its calendar permits. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

### / ,J. Parraguirre

cc: Charles Stephen Manley, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2 F NEU
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              Consent of KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
Bone Care International, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-23885) on Form S-8 of Bone Care International, Inc. of our report
dated August 6, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Bone
Care International, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 1999, which report
appears in the 2000 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Bone Care International,
Inc.

Our report dated August 6, 1999, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that Bone Care International, Inc. has suffered recurring losses from operations
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


/s/ KPMG LLP

    KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
October 16, 2000
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2135

To temporarily suspend the duty on Pigment Red 176.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 1, 2000

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To temporarily suspend the duty on Pigment Red 176.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT RED 176.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.74 Pigment Red 176

(CAS No.

12225–06–8)

(provided for in

subheading

3204.14.04) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section shall apply to goods entered, or withdrawn
2

•S 2135 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 23, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 23, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0478. J&R SCHUGEL TRUCKING, INC. et al. v. DONNA LOGAN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2015CV259701
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Metropolitan Health Networks,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
J. Sabo, Chief Financial Officer of Metropolitan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Metropolitan.





/s/ ROBERT J. SABORobert
      J. SaboChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      2, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.2

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
         Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, John Ray Rask, certify that:

     (1)  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Office
Managers, Inc., (the "Company");

     (2)  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

     (3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

     (4)  The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

          (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
     that material information relating to the Company is made known to us
     by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
     which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
     controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     (5)  The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the
audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons fulfilling
the equivalent function):

          (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability
     to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
     identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in
     internal controls; and

          (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
     or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
     internal controls; and

     (6)  The Company's other certifying officer and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.

Date: November 12, 2003       By: /s/ John Ray Rask
                              -------------------------------------------
                              John Ray Rask, Principal Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: October 26, 2007
    
    /s/ Stephen A. RomanoStephen A. RomanoChief Executive Officer/s/ Jeffrey R. FeelerJeffrey R. FeelerChief Financial Officer
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 

 National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

 Phone: 513-533-6825 

 Fax: 513-533-6826 

 

 July 2, 2008 

SEC Tracking number: SEC00102 

Peter M. Turcic, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Room C-4511 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Mr. Turcic: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as 

required by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to 

designate a class of employees at the SAM (Special Alloyed or Substitute Alloy Materials) 

Laboratories of Columbia University, in New York City, New York, as an addition to the Special 

Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000. On May 30, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS 

designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All employees of the Department of Energy (DOE), its predecessor agencies, and DOE 

contractors or subcontractors who worked in the Pupin, Schemerhorn, Havenmeyer, Nash, 

or Prentiss buildings at SAM (Special Alloyed or Substitute Alloy Materials) Laboratories of 

Columbia University in New York City, New York, from August 13, 1942, through December 

31, 1947, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days occurring either 

solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters 

established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on June 29, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on June 29, 2008, members of this class of employees, defined as 

reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Larry J. Elliott 

 Director 

 Office of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of
Cadence Financial Corporation (the Corporation) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard T. Haston, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard T. HastonName:

Richard HastonTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 11, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence
Financial Corporation and will be retained by Cadence Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28
```

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

                      THE MAJOR AUTOMOTIVE COMPANIES, INC.

                             MAJOR ACQUISITION CORP.
                          Major Automotive Group, Inc.
                              Major Chevrolet, Inc.
              Major Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Long Island City , Inc.
                                 Major Kia, Inc.

                      MAJOR AUTOMOTIVE OF NEW JERSEY, INC.
                          Compass Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
                               Compass Dodge, Inc.

                          MAJOR ORANGE PROPERTIES, LLC

                          MAJOR AUTOMOTIVE REALTY CORP.

                              HEMPSTEAD MAZDA, INC.

                               MAJOR NISSAN, INC.

                      MID-ATLANTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                           MAJOR FLEET & LEASING CORP
```
#### Southern Ry. in Ky. v. Winchester’s Admx.

(Decided March 18, 1911.)

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).

Appeals — Second Trial — Former law Governs. — On the second trial of a case the evidence being the same as on -the first trial the former opinion is the law of the case, that question being no longer an open one in the second appeal.

EDWARD P. HUMPHREY and HUMPHREY *&*HUMPHREY for appellant.

DAVID BAIRD, CHAS. H. SHIELD and KOHN, BAIRD, SLOSS & KOHN for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge O’Rear

Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case (127 Ky., 144.) The grounds urged for reversal on this appeal are: (1) that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence; and (2) that the trial court erred in permitting plaintiff’s counsel to make improper argument to the jury.

The evidence on the last trial was the same as in the first, barring the part excluded by the opinion on the *39former appeal. One of tire questions raised on the former appeal was whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. It was held that it was. The evidence being the same on the second trial, that question is no longer an open one in this case. The former opinion is the law of the case.

The argument which is complained of was a statement of plaintiff’s counsel to the effect that there was now no income from the decedent for his widow; that “there was no income coming into the little cottage on Hemlock street.” It is contended this was equivalent to a statement that the widow of the decedent was penniless, or that her needy condition should- be considered by the jury in making the verdict. It does not seem to have had that effect. On a former trial the verdict was for $5,000. On this trial it was for $4,000. The evidence which was excluded by the former opinion had no bearing on the amount of the verdict. If the matter objected to in this argument had any effect it would have been solely upon the compensation to be fixed by the jury. The verdict is a moderate one, clearly indicating that the jury was not influenced by the argument alluded to. A larger verdict, in the absence of such allusion, might well have stood. The matter under consideration appears immaterial on its face, and besides is shown by the record to have been not prejudicial.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (the Company) for the period
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Carolyn J. Logan, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Carolyn J. LoganCarolyn J. LoganPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 13, 2008
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Fred Lash, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





Dated: November 14, 2003



/s/    FRED LASHFred Lash Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1244

WILMA LEE RANKIN, Individually and in her

capacity as Guardian, Parent and next friend

of and for B. L. R., a minor,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 and

B. L. R., a minor; PAUL JAMES RANKIN, SR.,

Individually,

 Plaintiffs,

 versus

BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Berkeley

County, West Virginia; RONALD JONES,

Individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of

Berkeley County, West Virginia; K. C. BOHRER,

Individually and in his capacity as a

Supervisor and Deputy for the Berkeley County

Sheriff's Department; MARK SPESSERT; DANIEL L.

STEERMAN, Individually and in their capacities

as Deputies for the Berkeley County Sheriff’s

Department,

Defendants - Appellees,

 and

BERKELEY COUNTY COMMISSION; BERKELEY COUNTY

PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; PAMELA

GAMES-NEELY, Individually and in her capacity

as the agent for the Berkeley County

Prosecuting Attorney's Office,
- 2 -

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (3:02-cv-00010-WCB)

Submitted: September 12, 2007 Decided: October 3, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Laura V. Faircloth, LAW OFFICES OF LAURA FAIRCLOTH & ASSOCIATES,

Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Lucien G. Lewin,

Bridget M. Cohee, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, PLLC, Michael D. Lorensen,

BOWLES, RICE, MCDAVID, GRAFF & LOVE, LLP, Martinsburg, West

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Wilma Rankin, individually and in her capacity as

Guardian of B. L. R., a minor, appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and her

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the

reasons stated by the district court. Rankin v. Berkeley County

Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 3:02-cv-00010-WCB (N.D. W. Va. filed Jan. 12,

2006 & entered Jan. 13, 2006; Jan. 19 & Feb. 10, 2006). In

addition, we decline to consider claims brought for the first time

on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.

1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Console Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2008 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: October 2, 2008