Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Notices 24583 

margin exists for Qingdao Sea–line 

during the period November 1, 2008 

through April 30, 2009: 

FRESH GARLIC FROM THE PRC 

Exporter/Manufacturer Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

Exported by Qingdao 

Sea–line International 

Trading Co., Ltd. and 

Produced by Jinxiang 

County Juxinyuan 

Trading Co. Ltd. ........ 171.20 

Assessment Rates 

The Department will determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries. Consistent with 

the Fresh Garlic From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results and 

Partial Rescission of the 13th 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Reviews, 74 

FR 29174 (June 19, 2009) (Final Results 

Garlic Thirteenth Review), we will 

direct CBP to assess importer–specific 

assessment rates based on the resulting 

per–unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on 

each entry of the subject merchandise 

during the POR. See Final Results Garlic 

Thirteenth Review. Specifically, we will 

divide the total dumping margins for 

each importer by the total quantity of 

subject merchandise sold to that 

importer during the POR to calculate a 

per–unit assessment amount. We will 

direct CBP to assess importer–specific 

assessment rates based on the resulting 

per–unit (i.e., per kilogram) amount on 

each entry of the subject merchandise 

during the POR if any importer–specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. The Department will issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after publication 

of the final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Consistent with the final results of the 

Final Results Garlic Thirteenth Review, 

we will establish and collect a per– 

kilogram cash–deposit amount which 

will be equivalent to the company– 

specific dumping margin published in 

the final results of this review. 

Specifically, the following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date of the final 

results, as provided by section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act: (1) for subject merchandise 

produced by Jinxiang Juxinyuan and 

exported by Qingdao Sea–line, the cash 

deposit rate will be the per–unit rate 

determined in the final result of this 

new shipper review and; (2) for subject 

merchandise exported by Qingdao Sea– 

line but not produced by Jinxiang 

Juxinyuan, the cash deposit rate will be 

the per–unit PRC–wide rate. These 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations used 

in our analysis to parties to this 

proceeding not later than ten days after 

the date of public announcement, or if 

there is no public announcement within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice. See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Comments 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results 

and may submit case briefs and/or 

written comments within 30 days of the 

date of publication of this notice, unless 

otherwise notified by the Department. 

See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, will be due five days later, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties 

who submit case or rebuttal briefs in 

these proceedings are requested to 

submit with each argument: (1) a 

statement of the issue; and (2) a brief 

summary of the argument. Parties are 

requested to provide a summary of the 

arguments not to exceed five pages and 

a table of statutes, regulations, and cases 

cited. Additionally, parties are 

requested to provide their case and 

rebuttal briefs in electronic format (e.g., 

preferably in Microsoft Word). 

Interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration within 30 days 

of the date of publication of this notice. 

Requests should contain: (1) the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. See 19 

CFR 351.310(c). Issues raised in the 

hearing will be limited to those raised 

in case and rebuttal briefs. The 

Department will issue the final results 

of this review, including the results of 

its analysis of issues raised in any such 

written briefs not later than 90 days 

after these preliminary results are 

issued, unless the final results are 

extended. See 19 CFR 351.214(i). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(h). 

Dated: April 27, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10610 Filed 5–04–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign–Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1675] 

Reorganization/Expansion of Foreign– 

Trade Zone 21 

Charleston, South Carolina, Area 

Pursuant to its authority under the 

Foreign–Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign– 

Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

WHEREAS, the South Carolina State 

Ports Authority, grantee of Foreign– 

Trade Zone 21, submitted an 

application to the Board for authority to 

reorganize and expand its zone to delete 

Sites 3 and 10 in their entirety, remove 

acreage from Sites 5 and 7, and add 

eight new sites (proposed Sites 16–23) 

in the Charleston, South Carolina, area 

within and adjacent to the Charleston 

Customs and Border Protection port of 

entry (FTZ Docket 15–2009, filed 4/8/ 

09); 

WHEREAS, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (74 FR 17452–17453, 4/15/09) 

and the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

WHEREAS, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendation of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal, with respect to Sites 

3, 5, 7 and 10 and Sites 16, 17, 18, 21, 

22 and 23, is in the public interest; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize and 

expand FTZ 21 is approved in part 

(with respect to Sites 3, 5, 7 and 10 and 

Sites 16, 17, 18, 21, 22 and 23), subject 

to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
24584 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Notices 

regulations, including Section 400.28, 

and to the Board’s standard 2,000–acre 

activation limit for the overall general– 

purpose zone project, to sunset 

provisions that would terminate 

authority on April 30, 2013, for existing 

Sites 1–15 and 24 and on April 30, 

2015, for Sites 16, 17, 18, 21 and 23 

where no activity has occurred under 

FTZ procedures before those dates, and 

to a five-year time limit (to April 30, 

2015) for Site 22 (subject to extension 

upon review). 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day 

of April 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration Alternate ChairmanForeign– 

Trade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10618 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Request for Nominations for the 

Industry Trade Advisory Committees 

(ITACs) 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, Manufacturing and 

Services. 

ACTION: Request for nominations. 

SUMMARY: On February 17, 2010, the 

Secretary of Commerce and the United 

States Trade Representative (the USTR) 

renewed the charters of the 16 Industry 

Trade Advisory Committees (ITACs) 

and the Committee of Chairs of the 

ITACs for a four-year term to expire on 

February 17, 2014. The ITACs provide 

detailed policy and technical advice, 

information, and recommendations to 

the Secretary and the USTR regarding 

trade barriers, negotiation of trade 

agreements, and implementation of 

existing trade agreements affecting 

industry sectors; and perform other 

advisory functions relevant to U.S. trade 

policy matters as may be requested by 

the Secretary and the USTR or their 

designees. There are currently 

opportunities for membership on each 

ITAC. Nominations will be accepted for 

current vacancies and those that occur 

throughout the remainder of the charter 

term, which expires on February 17, 

2014. 

DATES: Appointments will be made on 

a rolling basis. For that reason, 

nominations will be accepted through 

February 17, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit nominations to 

Ingrid V. Mitchem, Director, Industry 

Trade Advisory Center, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Room 4043, Washington, 

DC 20230. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ingrid V. Mitchem, Director, Industry 

Trade Advisory Center, (202) 482–3268. 

Recruitment information also is 

available on the International Trade 

Administration Web site at: http:// 

www.trade.gov/itac. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 

as amended (5 U.S.C. App.) and section 

135 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 2155), the Secretary 

of Commerce (the Secretary) and the 

United States Trade Representative 

(USTR) have renewed the charters of 16 

Industry Trade Advisory Committees 

(ITACs) and the Committee of Chairs of 

the ITACs. The Secretary and the USTR 

welcome nominations for the ITACs 

listed below: 

Industry Trade Advisory Committees 

on: 

(ITAC 1) Aerospace Equipment 

(ITAC 2) Automotive Equipment and 

Capital Goods 

(ITAC 3) Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, 

Health/Science Products and 

Services 

(ITAC 4) Consumer Goods 

(ITAC 5) Distribution Services 

(ITAC 6) Energy and Energy Services 

(ITAC 7) Forest Products 

(ITAC 8) Information and 

Communications Technologies, 

Services, and Electronic Commerce 

(ITAC 9) Nonferrous Metals and 

Building Materials 

(ITAC 10) Services and Finance 

Industries 

(ITAC 11) Small and Minority Business 

(ITAC 12) Steel 

(ITAC 13) Textiles and Clothing 

(ITAC 14) Customs Matters and Trade 

Facilitation 

(ITAC 15) Intellectual Property Rights 

(ITAC 16) Standards and Technical 

Trade Barriers 

Background 

Section 135 of the Trade Act of 1974, 

as amended (19 U.S.C. 2155), directed 

the establishment of a private-sector 

trade advisory system to ensure that 

U.S. trade policy and trade negotiation 

objectives adequately reflect U.S. 

commercial and economic interests. 

Section 135(a)(1) directs the President 

to: 

Seek information and advice from 

representative elements of the private sector 

and the non-Federal governmental sector 

with respect to— 

(A) Negotiating objectives and bargaining 

positions before entering into a trade 

agreement under [Subchapter I of the Trade 

Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2111–2241) and 

section 2103 of the Bipartisan Trade 

Promotion Authority Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 

3803)]; 

(B) The operation of any trade agreement 

once entered into, including preparation for 

dispute settlement panel proceedings to 

which the United States is a party; and 

(C) Other matters arising in connection 

with the development, implementation, and 

administration of the trade policy of the 

United States * * * 

Section 135(c)(2) of the 1974 Trade Act 

provides that: 

(2) The President shall establish such 

sectoral or functional advisory committees as 

may be appropriate. Such committees shall, 

insofar as is practicable, be representative of 

all industry, labor, agricultural, or service 

interests (including small business interests) 

in the sector or functional areas concerned. 

In organizing such committees, the United 

States Trade Representative and the 

Secretaries of Commerce, Labor, Agriculture, 

the Treasury, or other executive departments, 

as appropriate, shall— 

(A) Consult with interested private 

organizations; and 

(B) Take into account such factors as— 

(i) Patterns of actual and potential 

competition between United States industry 

and agriculture and foreign enterprise in 

international trade, 

(ii) The character of the nontariff barriers 

and other distortions affecting such 

competition, 

(iii) The necessity for reasonable limits on 

the number of such advisory committees, 

(iv) The necessity that each committee be 

reasonably limited in size, and 

(v) In the case of each sectoral committee, 

that the product lines covered by each 

committee be reasonably related. 

Pursuant to this provision, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

and the Office of the USTR (USTR) have 

established and co-administer 16 ITACs, 

the Committee of Chairs of the ITACs, 

and the Industry Trade Advisory Center. 

Functions 

The duties of the ITACs are to provide 

the President, through the Secretary and 

the USTR, with detailed policy and 

technical advice, information, and 

recommendations regarding trade 

barriers, negotiation of trade 

agreements, and implementation of 

existing trade agreements affecting 

industry sectors; and perform other 

advisory functions relevant to U.S. trade 

policy matters as may be requested by 

the Secretary and the USTR or their 

designees. The ITACs provide 

nonpartisan, industry input in the 

development of trade policy objectives. 

The ITACs’ efforts have assisted the 

United States in putting forward unified 

positions when it negotiates trade 

agreements. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES