22626 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 82 / Thursday, April 29, 2010 / Notices 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aarti Shah, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–2657. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

April 23, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain electronic devices 

with multi-touch enabled touchpads or 

touchscreens that infringe one or more 

of claims 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 

19, 21, 24, 26, and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 

5,825,352, and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Elan Microelectronics Corporation, 

No. 12, Innovation 1st Road, Science 

Based Industrial Park, Hsinchu Taiwan 

308, Taiwan. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, 

California 95014. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Aarti Shah, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 23, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–9912 Filed 4–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–10–013] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: States 

International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: May 3, 2010 at 11 a.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Agenda 

for future meetings: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731–TA–1159 (Final) 

(Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

from China)—briefing and vote. (The 

Commission is currently scheduled to 

transmit its determination and 

Commissioners’ opinions to the 

Secretary of Commerce on or before May 

17, 2010.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 26, 2010. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10070 Filed 4–27–10; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

With Big River Zinc Corporation 

Providing for Civil Penalties and 

Injunctive Relief Under the Clean Air 

Act 

Notice is hereby given that on April 

15, 2009, a proposed Consent Decree 

with Big River Zinc Corporation (‘‘BRZ’’) 

providing for civil penalties and 

injunctive Relief under the Clean Air 

Act in United States v. Big River Zinc 

Corp., Civil Action No. 3:10–cv–00276– 

DRH–CJP was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Southern 

District of Illinois. 

In this action the United States sought 

injunctive relief and assessment of civil 

penalties for violation of the New 

Source Performance Standards (‘‘NSPS’’) 

of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7411, 

and the NSPS regulations codified at 40 

CFR part 60, at a plant in Sauget, 

Illinois, which is owned and operated 

by BRZ. The Decree, which was lodged 

simultaneously with the filing of the 

complaint, resolves claims arising out of 

BRZ’s replacement of two roasting units. 

BRZ has not operated its roasters since 

early 2006. Under the proposed Decree, 

BRZ may not restart either of its roasters 

for the purpose of resuming zinc 

roasting operations until it installs a 

scrubber system that is designed to meet 

applicable control limits with which 

BRZ must comply after resuming zinc 

roasting operations. In the event that 

BRZ does not resume zinc roasting 

operations within five years of entry of 

the Consent Decree, it must 

permanently shut down its zinc roasting 

operations and surrender all related 

pollution credits. The proposed Decree 

will also require BRZ to pay a civil 

penalty of $250,000. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

comments relating to the proposed 

Consent Decrees for a period of thirty 

(30) days from the date of this 

publication. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and either e-mailed 

to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, should refer to United 

States v. Big River Zinc Corp., D.J. Ref. 

90–5–2–1–08230. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES