alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR TEH FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 OF MAHASKA INVESTMENT COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,635
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,284
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          26,427
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            26,280
<LOANS>                                        124,052
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,578)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254,946
<DEPOSITS>                                     207,686
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,810
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,657
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,423
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 254,946
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,720
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  786
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,530
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,036
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,029
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,193
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,843
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      128
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,144
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,378
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   10.77
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,031
<LOANS-PAST>                                       199
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   356
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               (1,491)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       64
<RECOVERIES>                                      (23)
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              (1,578)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           (1,578)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        (1,224)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25240-25241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10538]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463, 
EPA gives notice of a meeting of the National Advisory Council for 
Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice to 
the EPA Administrator on a broad range of environmental policy, 
technology, and management issues. NACEPT is a committee of individuals 
who represent diverse interests from academia, industry, non-
governmental organizations, and local, state, and tribal governments. 
The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the Council's FY 20l0-FY 2012 
agenda, which includes vulnerable populations and workforce issues. A 
copy of the agenda for the meeting will be posted at http://www.epa.gov//ocem/nacept/cal-nacept.htm.

DATES: NACEPT will hold a two-day meeting on Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 
from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Wednesday, May 26, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 
2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, 
1800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202. The meeting is open 
to the public, with limited seating on a first-come, first-served 
basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sonia Altieri, designated Federal 
officer, [email protected], (202) 564-0243, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Cooperative Environmental Management (1601M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make oral comments or to provide 
written comments to the Council should be sent to Sonia Altieri, 
designated Federal officer, at the contact information above. All 
requests must be submitted no later than May 17, 2010.

[[Page 25241]]

    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Sonia Altieri at 202-564-
0243 or [email protected]. To request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact Sonia Altieri, preferably at least 10 days 
prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process 
your request.

    Dated: April 29, 2010.
Sonia Altieri,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-10538 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1670 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1670

  To revise the boundary of Fort Matanzas National Monument, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 1999

 Mr. Graham (for himself and Mr. Mack) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To revise the boundary of Fort Matanzas National Monument, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Map.--The term ``Map'' means the map entitled ``Fort 
        Matanzas National Monument'', numbered 347/80,004 and dated 
        February, 1991.
            (2) Monument.--The term ``Monument'' means the Fort 
        Matanzas National Monument in Florida.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF BOUNDARY.

    (a) In General.--The boundary of the Monument is revised to include 
an area totaling approximately 70 acres, as generally depicted on the 
Map.
    (b) Availability of Map.--The Map shall be on file and available 
for public inspection in the office of the Director of the National 
Park Service.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL LAND.

    The Secretary may acquire any land, water, or interests in land 
that are located within the revised boundary of the Monument by--
            (1) donation;
            (2) purchase with donated or appropriated funds;
            (3) transfer from any other Federal agency; or
            (4) exchange.

SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION.

    Subject to applicable laws, all land and interests in land held by 
the United States that are included in the revised boundary under 
section 2 shall be administered by the Secretary as part of the 
Monument.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary 
to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, our financial condition and result of operations. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                           |                                                                 |                                    |
|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                           | CHINA                FRUITS CORPORATION(Registrant)                  |
|                                           |                                                                 |                                    |
| Date: April                13, 2007  | By:                                                        | /s/ Huang,                Xiao Yun |
|                                           | Huang,                Xiao YunChief                Financial Officer |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2064 ORETHA STEPP, Surviving spouse (divorced) of Harold Willis, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF W ORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; UNITED STATES STEEL MINING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. 96-0210-BLA) Submitted: April 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oretha Stepp, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Jill M. Otte, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Howard Gerald Salisbury, Jr., KAY, CASTO, CHANEY, LOVE & WISE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1997). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Stepp v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs , No. 96-0219-BLA (B.R.B. June 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
      undersigned, Colin Halpern, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial
      Officer and Director of Universal Services Group, Inc. (the
      "Company"),certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes
      of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the quarterly period ended August 1, 2003 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      August 15, 2007





/s/
      Colin
      Halpern


Colin
      Halpern


Chief
      Executive Officer,


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer and Director





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
463 A.2d 23

#### Commonwealth v. Anderson, Appellant.

Submitted June 16, 1982.

Harry E. Knafelc, for appellant; Edward J. Tocci, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before BROSKY, JOHNSON and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 6458

CASEY RAFAEL TYLER ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. KATY POOLE, Individual and official capacity; WILLIAM BULLARD, Individual and official capacity; RONALD COVINGTON, Captain, Individual capacity; CAROL TORES, Captain, Individual capacity; JERRY INGRAM, JR., Unit Manager, Individual capacity; THORNE LOCKLEAR, Correctional officer, Individual capacity ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United Sta tes District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. William L. Osteen, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv

- 01142

- WO

- JLW )

Submitted : September 22, 2020 Decided: September 2 5 , 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Casey Rafael Tyler seeks to appeal the district court’s order adoptin g the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and granting in part and denying in part his motion for summary
judgment . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1 292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Tyler
seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of j urisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.7
                                                                    ------------


THIS  SUPPLEMENTAL  DEED OF  GUARANTEE  is made this 17th day of January 2001 by
DATAWATCH  EUROPE LTD a company  registered  under the laws of England and Wales
under  company  number  02887429  with its  principal  place of  business at The
Software Centre, East Way, Lee Mill Industrial Estate, Ivybridge,  Plymouth PL21
9PE (the  "Guarantor")  in favour of SILICON VALLEY BANK a California  chartered
bank,  with its principal  place of business at 3003 Tasman Drive,  Santa Clara,
California 95054 USA (the "Bank")

WHEREAS:

(A)      This Deed is  supplemental  to the Deed of Guarantee  dated 27 December
         1999 and made between the same parties as this Deed (the "Principal
         Deed").

(B)      At the request of (inter  alia) the  Guarantor,  the Bank has agreed to
         vary the terms of the Loan  Agreements  (as  defined  in the  Principal
         Deed) and the  Guarantor  has agreed to vary the terms of the Principal
         Deed in manner hereafter appearing.

WITNESSES as follows:

1.       INTERPRETATION

1.1      In this Deed words and expressions defined in the Principal Deed shall
         have the same meanings herein.

1.2      "Effective Date" means 29 December 2000.

2.       AMENDMENT

2.1      As from the Effective Date the Principal Deed shall be amended by the
         deletion of Clause 1(i) and substitution of the following:-

         "(i)     the  expression  the "Loan  Agreements"  means the Amended and
                  Restated Loan and Security  Agreement dated 16 March 1999 made
                  between the Bank and the Principal  and Personics  Corporation
                  as amended by the Loan  Modification  Agreement  dated of even
                  date herewith and made between  Datawatch  Corporation and the
                  Bank and the Export-Import Loan and Security Agreement of even
                  date herewith made between (inter alia) the Bank and Datawatch
                  Corporation  as each of them may be  amended,  renewed  and/or
                  restated from time to time."

2.2      Save as amended by Clause 2.1 above, all the terms of the Principal
         Deed shall remain in full force and effect.

<PAGE>

3.       MISCELLANEOUS

         Where the context  admits the  provisions  of Clause 1 of the Principal
         Deed  (Interpretation) and the provisions of Clause 22 of the Principal
         Deed (Law and  Jurisdiction)  shall apply  (mutatis  mutandis)  to this
         Deed.

IN WITNESS  whereof this Deed has been  executed as a deed and  delivered by the
parties hereto on the day and year first before written.


EXECUTED AND DELIVERED as a Deed by
DATAWATCH EUROPE LTD acting by:-


 /s/  Bruce R. Gardner
-----------------------------
Director

 /s/  John F. Cave
-----------------------------
Director/Secretary


EXECUTED AND DELIVERED as a Deed by
SILICON VALLEY BANK by:-


 /s/ Maggie Garcia                                         .
-----------------------------

A person authorised under the laws of
Californiato execute and deliver a
document as a deed
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
Celestica Inc. (the "Company"), that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|March 20, 2007 |  |     |                                            
|-------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------
|               |  | By: | /s/CRAIG H. MUHLHAUSER                     
|               |  |     | Craig H. Muhlhauser
Chief Executive Officer
|March 20, 2007 |  |     |                                            
|               |  | By: | /s/ANTHONY P. PUPPI                        
|               |  |     | Anthony P. Puppi
Chief Financial Officer   

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
Signal Technology, Inc.
  Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Report of Applied Signal Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L. Yancey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Gary L. Yancey
        _____________ _____      |  | Date: March 9, 2004
        _______________
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Gary L. YanceyPresident and Chief Executive Officer |  |
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

November 02, 2007

Ms. Sandra D. Hachem

Harris County Sr. Assistant Attorney

2525 Murworth, Suite 300

Houston, TX 77054

Mr. William B. Connolly

William B. Connolly & Associates

2930 Revere, Suite 300

Houston, TX 77098

RE:Case Number:  07-0511

Court of Appeals Number:  14-04-01031-CV

Trial Court Number:  2003-08998J

Style:IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.J., A CHILD

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 07-0511Page 1**
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1569

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the

Taunton River in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for study for

potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 8, 1999

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate

segments of the Taunton River in the Commonwealth

of Massachusetts for study for potential addition to the

National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taunton River Wild

5 and Scenic River Study Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds that—
2

•S 1569 IS

1 (1) the Taunton River in the State of Massa2 chusetts possesses important resource values (includ3 ing wildlife, ecological, and scenic values), historic

4 sites, and a cultural past important to the heritage

5 of the United States;

6 (2) there is strong support among State and

7 local officials, area residents, and river users for a

8 cooperative wild and scenic river study of the area;

9 and

10 (3) there is a longstanding interest among

11 State and local officials, area residents, and river

12 users in undertaking a concerted cooperative effort

13 to manage the river in a productive and meaningful

14 way.

15 SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT.

16 Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

17 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended—

18 (1) by redesignating the second paragraph (8)

19 as paragraph (10);

20 (2) by redesignating the second paragraph (11)

21 as paragraph (12);

22 (3) by redesignating the third paragraph (11)

23 as paragraph (13);

24 (4) by redesignating the fourth paragraph (11)

25 as paragraph (14);
3

•S 1569 IS

1 (5) by redesignating the first undesignated

2 paragraph as paragraph (15);

3 (6) by redesignating the second undesignated

4 paragraph as paragraph (16); and

5 (7) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(17) TAUNTON RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.—Not

7 later than 3 years after the date of enactment of

8 this paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior—

9 ‘‘(A) shall complete the study of the Taun10 ton River, Massachusetts; and

11 ‘‘(B) shall submit to Congress a report de12 scribing the results of the study.’’.

13 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

14 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

15 as are necessary to carry out this Act.

Æ