alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than February 4, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Steve Foley, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                

*1. Richard T. Alger, the Richard T. Alger Revocable Trust, Richard T. Alger, trustee, and the Mason W. Alger and Dorothy Turner Alger Irrevocable Trust for Thomas M. Alger, Richard T. Alger, trustee*, all of Homestead, Florida; to acquire voting shares of Hometown of Homestead Banking Company, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 1st National Bank of South Florida, both of Homestead, Florida.                

*2. William Hall Losner*, Homestead, Florida; to acquire voting shares of Hometown of Homestead Banking Company, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 1st National Bank of South Florida, both of Homestead, Florida.                

**B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

*1. A.C. Schwethelm*, Comfort, Texas; to retain voting shares of, and acquire additional shares of Paint Rock Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of, and acquire additional voting shares of First State Bank, both of Paint Rock, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 15, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-1038 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

May 17, 2024 CR-2023-0403Charles Daniel Goggins v State of Alabama (Appeal from Chilton Circuit Court: CC22-309) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on May 17, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
(No. 5696.

March 10, 1931.)

#### HELEN G. SCANLON, Appellant, v. B. A. McDEVITT, Executor of the Estate of JAMES E. SCANLON, Deceased, Respondent.

[296 Pac. 1016.]

P. C. O’Malley, for Appellant.

*450B. A. McDevitt, for Respondent.

*451GIVENS, J.-

In 1924, James E. Scanlon, on an amended complaint charging desertion, and alleging that there were no community property rights, secured a divorce from Helen G. Scanlon, in which action Mrs. Scanlon filed no pleadings but through her attorneys, entered into a stipulation which stated that in full settlement of all property rights of the parties, Mr. Scanlon should pay Mrs. Scanlon $25 a month until William Scanlon, the youngest of the three minor children then in Mrs. Scanlon’s custody, should reach his majority. Such stipulation was approved in the decree as in full settlement of all property rights of the parties.

Thereafter Mr. Scanlon made a will leaving nine-tenths of his property to the three minor children, and one-tenth, in portions of one-twentieth each, to an orphanage and a parish priest, respectively.

After Mr. Scanlon’s death, January, 1930,, Mrs. Scanlon instituted the present action May, 1930, against his executor, to set aside the property settlement made at the time of the divorce proceedings, and the decree based thereon, as in fraud of appellant, and declare a trust in one-half the property held by Mr. Scanlon at his death as community property.

Appellant contends the complaint in the divorce action was intended to deceive her, and that she was thereby fraudulently misled into believing that there was no community property, and hence mistakenly authorized full settlement of the community property rights by the aforesaid payments, and received no division of the community property. Appellant also urges ignorance of the law, which may not avail her. *(Glover v. Brown,*32 Ida. 426, at 441, 184 Pac. 649; 34 C. J. 461.)

The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint on the ground among others that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The fraud urged by appellant as a basis for setting aside the previous decree is intrinsic, and not extrinsic or collateral thereto. *452The demurrer, therefore, was properly sustained. *(Donovan v. Miller,*12 Ida. 600, 10 Ann. Cas. 444, 88 Pac. 82, 9 L. R. A. 524; *Zounich v. Anderson,*35 Ida. 792, 208 Pac. 402; *Stone v. Stone,*58 Cal. App. 415, 208 Pac. 993; 34 C. J. 472.)

This disposition of the cause renders it unnecessary to discuss other features of the case. The decree sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Lee, C. J., and Budge, Varían and McNaughton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,034,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,655,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    890,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,934,124
<PP&E>                                       5,295,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,616,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,652,152
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        591
<COMMON>                                        70,048
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,151,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,616,620
<SALES>                                      3,572,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,572,822
<CGS>                                        2,164,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,164,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,226,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (159,162)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,663)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,305
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# Time and Date: 

The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, February 20, 2008. The closed portion of the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the meeting. 

# Place: 

Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye Street NW., Washington DC 20006. 

# Status: 

The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Matter to be Considered at the Open Portion:

*Amendment to the Capital Structure Plan of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle.*

# Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion:

Periodic Update of Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Shelia Willis, Paralegal Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or                         *williss@fhfb.gov.*

Dated: February 12, 2008. 

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

Neil R. Crowley,

Acting General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 08-742 Filed 2-13-08; 1:24 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1848

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the

design, planning, and construction of the Denver Water Reuse project.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of

the Interior to participate in the design, planning, and

construction of the Denver Water Reuse project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DENVER WATER REUSE PROJECT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and

5 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h

6 et seq.) is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating sections 1631, 1632, 1633,

8 and 1634 (43 U.S.C. 390h–13, 390h–14, 390h–15,
2

•S 1848 IS

1 390h–16) as sections 1632, 1633, 1634, and 1635,

2 respectively; and

3 (2) by inserting after section 1630 the fol4 lowing:

5 ‘‘SEC. 1631. DENVER WATER REUSE PROJECT.

6 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera7 tion with the appropriate State and local authorities, may

8 participate in the design, planning, and construction of the

9 Denver Water Reuse project to reclaim and reuse water

10 in the service area of the Denver Water Department of

11 the city and county of Denver, Colorado.

12 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

13 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed

14 25 percent of the total cost.

15 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary

16 shall not be used for the operation or maintenance of the

17 project described in subsection (a).’’.

18 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

19 (1) The Reclamation Wastewater and Ground20 water Study and Facilities Act (as amended by sub21 section (a)(1)) is amended—

22 (A) in section 1632(a), by striking ‘‘1630’’

23 and inserting ‘‘1631’’;

24 (B) in section 1633(c), by striking ‘‘section

25 1633’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1634’’; and
3

•S 1848 IS

1 (C) in section 1634, by striking ‘‘section

2 1632’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1633’’.

3 (2) The table of contents in section 2 of the

4 Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment

5 Act of 1992 is amended by striking the items relat6 ing to sections 1631 through 1634 and inserting the

7 following:

‘‘Sec. 1631. Denver water reuse project.

‘‘Sec. 1632. Authorization of appropriations.

‘‘Sec. 1633. Groundwater study.

‘‘Sec. 1634. Authorization of appropriations.

‘‘Sec. 1635. Willow Lake natural treatment system project.’’.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ELIZABETH MUNOZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00072-CR

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D02421)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until December 8, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. John L. Williams, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 8, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8

th day of November, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1075]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Submit comments on or before March 22, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments regarding whether this information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of 
the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are 
ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the 
collection, to Shelia Thomas, Office of Business Development, Small 
Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 
20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelia Thomas, mail to: Office of 
Business Development, 202-205-5852, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#681b000d040109461c000705091b281b0a09460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4a7bcb1b8bdb5faa0bcbbb9b5a794a7b6b5fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>., Curtis B. 
Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#610214131508124f13080209211203004f060e17"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d2e383f39243e633f242e250d3e2f2c632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Form will be an Addendum to the 8(a) 
Annual Update Form (SBA Form 1450). The section 8(a) Business 
Development (BD) Program was designed by Congress to provide socially 
and economically disadvantaged businesses with management and technical 
assistance to enhance their ability to compete in the American 
marketplace. The 8(a) Program utilizes various forms of assistance 
(e.g. procurement, financial, and management and technical assistance 
through 7(j) designated funds) to foster the business growth and 
development of 8(a) Program participants.
    Title: ``8(a) Annual Update Addendum.''
    Description of Respondents: Annually.
    Form Numbers: N/A.
    Annual Responses: 7,644.
    Annual Burden: 15,288.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 2010-1075 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10533

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

STEPHANIE ANN HATLEY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-119-3

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stephanie Ann Hatley pleaded guilty of conspiring to traffic

methamphetamine. She now appeals, challenging her 20-year sentence. 

The Guidelines findings the district court made—a total offense level of 

42 and criminal history category of II—normally result in a recommended 

sentencing range of 30 years to life. But because the drug statute she was 

convicted under has a statutory maximum of 20 years, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10533 Document: 00514865067 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2019
No. 18-10533

2

841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(C), the Guidelines range was capped. U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(a). 

After overruling Hatley’s objections to the Guidelines and sentencing her to 

the statutory maximum of 20 years, the district court stated that was “the 

sentence I would impose, regardless of what the Guideline range might have 

been for sentencing, because I think that’s a sentence that is required to 

address” the statutory sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553. It reached that 

conclusion because the amount of meth involved in Hatley’s offense would have 

subjected her to a 40-year statutory maximum, but the government allowed 

her to plead to a lesser offense with the 20-year cap. The district court further

observed that even if it had awarded Hatley a reduction for acceptance of 

responsibility (it did not based on its finding that she raised frivolous objections 

at sentencing), the Guideline range would still have exceeded the statutory 

maximum sentence it imposed. 

These explanations for why the court imposed the 20-year sentence doom 

Hatley’s appeal of three Guidelines rulings. The district court made clear that

a different outcome on the Guidelines’ rulings Hatley challenges—involving 

enhancements for a firearm and importing the drugs from Mexico, and 

rejection of acceptance of responsibility—would not have changed her

sentence. And its reasoning makes sense given that ruling in Hatley’s favor 

on these issues would not have reduced the Guidelines range below the 

sentence the court imposed. Any Guidelines error was harmless. See, e.g.,

United States v. Halverson, 897 F.3d 645, 652 (5th Cir. 2018); United States v. 

Castro-Alfonso, 841 F.3d 292, 298 (5th Cir. 2016); United States v. IbarraLuna, 628 F.3d 712, 718 (5th Cir. 2010). 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-10533 Document: 00514865067 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE SECOND QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       9,435,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,747,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    112,140,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (70,518,489)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,747,237
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,398,671
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               350,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,662,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,613,823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,613,823)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,613,823)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (87.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (87.28)
        

</TABLE>