alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIOSH White Paper January 25, 2013

This is a working document prepared by NIOSH. White Paper documents are not final NIOSH positions unless specifically marked 

as such. This document represents preliminary position taken on technical issues prepared by NIOSH. 

NOTICE: This report has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has 

been cleared for distribution.

Ten-Year Program Review: NIOSH Progress on Issues and Actions Items Related to 

the Quality of Service Review, Issue 3, Action 1

Issue 3: Issues related to access to information

Action 1: DFO and staff will continue efforts to see that Board and Work Group work products are 

posted on the web site as soon as practical.

Status: Complete

Summary: The Division of Compensation Analysis and Support (DCAS) strives to post information to the 

NIOSH Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas) as soon as possible. Every effort is made to post 

information within 24 hours of receiving it. 

The Web site contains a vast amount of information (e.g., technical reports, meeting information, 

transcripts, etc.) that may be of interest to claimants, advocates, and the public. In response to the 

growing interest of claimants, advocates, and the public regarding the activities of the Advisory Board 

on Radiation and Worker Health, DCAS has begun making Advisory Board discussion papers and work 

products (e.g., white papers, memos, Work Group summary reports, presentations, etc.) available on 

the Web site. In addition, similar products produced by DCAS are also being posted to the Web site. 

Many of these items are used for discussion purposes during Advisory Board and Work Group meetings

and allows claimants, advocates, and the public to have access to information being discussed during 

the meetings. This practice continues DCAS’ goal of making our activities transparent and available to 

claimants, advocates, and the public.
<PAGE>

                               AMISTAR CORPORATION

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
             OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amistar Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Stuart C. Baker
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows of the Company.

                                                  By: /s/ Stuart C. Baker
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name: Stuart C. Baker
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amistar Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Gregory D. Leiser
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows of the Company.


                                                  By: /s/ Gregory D. Leiser
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name: Gregory D. Leiser
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.1

                       MOTORS AND GEARS, INC.
       COMPUTATIONS OF THE RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       (dollars in thousands)



                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                    ----------------------------------
                                       1999        1998       1997
                                       ----        ----       ----

     Fixed Charges
         Interest expense            $31,291    $31,203    $21,310
         Rental expense included in
     fixed charges                     1,183      1,246        644
                                      ------     ------     ------
             Total fixed charges      32,474     32,449     21,954

     Earnings
         Pre-tax income               17,316     10,026      5,784
         Plus:  fixed charges         32,474     32,449     21,954
                                      ------     ------     ------
              Total Earnings         $49,790    $42,475    $27,738

     Ratio of earnings to fixed         1.5        1.3        1.3
     charges                            ===        ===        ===
(November 3, 1923.)

#### THE BANK OF ROBERTS, a Corporation, Respondent, v. CHRIS OLAVESON, BERTHA OLAVESON, JAMES OLAVESON and JOAN OLAVESON, Defendants; MENAN MILLING COMPANY, LTD., a Corporation, and E. M. STAKER, Appellants.

[221 Pac. 563.]

APPEAL from the District Court of the Ninth Judicial District, for Jefferson County. Hon. James G. Gwinn, Judge.

Action to foreclose chattel mortgage. Judgment for plaintiff.

*Affirmed.*

W. H. Holden and F. A. McCall, for Appellant E. M. Staker.

C. W. Poole, for Appellant Menan Milling Co., Ltd.

Otto E. McCutcheon and O. E. McCuteheon, for Respondent.

BUDGE, C. J.

— In this case the facts and questions of law are substantially the same as those presented to this court in the case of *The Bank of Roberts v. Olaveson et al., ante,*p. 223, 221 Pac. 560. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Costs are awarded to respondent.

McCarthy, Dunn and Wm. E. Lee, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
--------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-20137 of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital Trust II
and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding II, L.P. on Form S-3 of our reports dated
March 23, 2007 (which reports expressed an unqualified opinion and included an
explanatory paragraph regarding Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc's announced intention
to redeem its 8% Affliate Debentures held by Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding
II, L.P. on March 30, 2007, which will result in the dissolution of Merrill
Lynch Preferred Capital Trust II and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding II, L.P.),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital
Trust II and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding II, L.P. for the year ended
December 29, 2006.

/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 23, 2007
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (No. 333-53340, No. 333-76079 and No. 333-124567) and Forms S-3 (No.
333-111957 and No. 333-136866) of Bluefly, Inc. of our report dated
March 5, 2009 relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.





/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





New York,
New York


March 5,
2009
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1794 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1794

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2000

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal courthouse at 145 East Simpson Avenue in 
  Jackson, Wyoming, as the ``Clifford P. Hansen Federal Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CLIFFORD P. HANSEN FEDERAL COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal courthouse at 145 East Simpson Avenue in Jackson, 
Wyoming, shall be known and designated as the ``Clifford P. Hansen 
Federal Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal courthouse referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Clifford P. Hansen 
Federal Courthouse.

            Passed the Senate March 2, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 162 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 162

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to change the determination 
  of the 50,000-barrel refinery limitation on oil depletion deduction 
          from a daily basis to an annual average daily basis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

  Mr. Breaux (for himself, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Helms, and Mr. Nickles) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to change the determination 
  of the 50,000-barrel refinery limitation on oil depletion deduction 
          from a daily basis to an annual average daily basis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF LARGE REFINER EXCEPTION TO OIL DEPLETION 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 613A(d)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to certain refiners excluded) is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(4) Certain refiners excluded.--If the taxpayer or a 
        related person engages in the refining of crude oil, subsection 
        (c) shall not apply to the taxpayer for a taxable year if the 
        average daily refinery runs of the taxpayer and the related 
        person for the taxable year exceed 50,000 barrels. For purposes 
        of this paragraph, the average daily refinery runs for any 
        taxable year shall be determined by dividing the aggregate 
        refinery runs for the taxable year by the number of days in the 
        taxable year.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



Peregrine Federal Systems, Inc. (Illinois)

Prototype, Inc. (California)

XVT Software, Inc. (Colorado)

Peregrine Bridge Subsidiary, Inc. (Delaware)

Peregrine Systems of Canada, Inc. (Canada)

Peregrine Systems, GmbH (Germany)

Peregrine Systems, B.V. (Netherlands)

Peregrine Systems, Ltd. (UK)

Peregrine Systems International, Inc. (Barbados)

Peregrine Systems Australia Pty, Ltd. (Australia)

Peregrine Systems, Private Ltd. (Singapore)

Peregrine Asset Management Corporation (Delaware)

Peregrine Systems, K.K. (Japan)

FPrint UK, Ltd. (UK)

Peregrine Systems, S.A. (France)

Aquisition Et Gestion De Donnees Et Signaux (France)

Apsylog, Inc. (California)

Apsylog, GmbH (Germany)

Peregrine Systems Global, Ltd. (Ireland)

Knowlix Corporation (Delaware)

Micro Computer Company of Delaware, Inc. (Delaware)

<PAGE>

Facility Management Systems (Illinois)

Peregrine Nova Scotia Company (Nova Scotia)

Peregrine Systems Rail Management, Inc. (Massachusetts)

Peregrine Systems Ltd. (Canada)

Telco Research Corporation (Tennessee)

TSB International Pty Ltd. (Australia)

Telco Research Ltd. (UK)

TMSI, Inc. (Virginia)

Telco Research NV/SA (Belgium)

SRCM Ltd. (UK)

Systems Reliability France SA (France)

TSB Acquisition Corp. (US)

Wayland Systems Ltd. (UK)

Peregrine Systems Do Brasil Limitada (Brazil)

Peregrine Systems A/S (Denmark)

Peregrine Systems SRL (Italy)

Peregrine Systems S.A. (Spain)

Peregrine Systems B.V.B.A. (Belgium)

Peregrine Systems GmbH (Switzerland)

Peregrine Systems AB (Sweden)

Peregrine Systems AS (Norway)

Peregrine Systems OY (Finland)

Peregrine Systems New Zealand Limited (New Zealand)

<PAGE>

Peregrine Systems Limited (Hong Kong)

Peregrine Systems Operations, Limited (Ireland)

Peregrine Connectivity, Inc. (Georgia)

Harbinger Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)

Harabinger de Mexico, S de RL de C.V. (Mexico)

Harbinger International S.r.l. (Italy)

Harbinger Holdings B.V. (Netherlands)

Harbinger N.V. (Netherlands )

Harbinger GmbH (Germany)

Harbinger Canada (Canada)

Peregrine E-Markets, Inc. (Delaware)

Harbinger Data Communications B.V. (Netherlands)

Harbinger Computer Centrum B.V. (Netherlands)

Harbinger UK Ltd. (UK)

Harbinger, S.A. (France)

Prime Factors, Inc. (Oregon)

Peregrine California Padres, Inc. (Delaware)

Peregrine Ontario Blue Jays, Inc. (Delaware)

Peregrine Diamond, Inc. (Delaware)

Peregrine Ottawa Nova Scotia Co. (Canada)

Peregrine Networks Canada, Inc. (Canada)

Loran International Technologies, Inc. (Canada)

Loran Network Management Ltd. (Barbados)

Loran Technologies Inc. (Virginia)

<PAGE>

Loran Network Systems, Inc. (Canada)

Loran Network Systems LLC (Delaware)

Extricity, Inc. (Delaware)

Extricity B.V. (Netherlands)

Extricity Software Limited (UK)

Extricity GmbH (Germany)

Extricity SARL (France)

Extricity (Canada) Corporation (Canada)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Theodore A. Babcock, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TNP Enterprises, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and as presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and; 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 4, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1



                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                       SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Technology Research Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert S. Wiggins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.






    November 14, 2003         /s/ Robert S. Wiggins
    _________________         _________________________
          Date                Robert S. Wiggins
                              Chairman of the Board and
                              Chief Executive Officer
























                                   - 19 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            1961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5058
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       5947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 13309
<PP&E>                                            4801
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2147
<BONDS>                                           4500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19935
<SALES>                                          16097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16097
<CGS>                                            10232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1121
<INCOME-TAX>                                       448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
(June 2, 1910.)

#### STATE, Appellant, v. T. S. YOUNGBLOOD, Respondent.

[109 Pac. 726.]

SULLIVAN, C. J.

This ease was submitted by stipulation at the time of the submission of the case of *State v. Wall, ante,*p. 300, 109 Pac. 724, and the complaint contained the same *308allegations as the complaint in that ease, with the exception that it is alleged that defendant Youngblood was engaged in the drug business at the time he is charged with selling intoxicating liquors.

Sec. 1522 of the Rev. Codes expressly prohibits druggists from selling intoxicating liquors to be drunk on the premises, and it is contended by counsel for respondent that this action is an attempt to license a business which is prohibited expressly by statute, and that cannot be done. There is nothing in that contention. The fact that Youngblood was- engaged in the drug business would not relieve him from paying the license tax for carrying on the business of selling intoxicating liquors the same as saloonmen generally conduct it, any more than it would relieve a groceryman from paying the license tax for carrying on the business of selling intoxicating liquors. That being true, under the stipulation, upon the authority of the case of *State v. Wall, ante,*p. 300, 109 Pac. 724, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. Costs are awarded to appellant.

Ailshde, J., concurs.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

 
| **NAME OF  SUBSIDIARIES**       | ** ** | **JURISDICTION  OF  INCORPORATION** | ** ** | **SUBSIDIARIES  DOING  BUSINESS AS**               |
|---------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                            |       |                                |       |                                               |
| StarTek USA, Inc.          |       | Colorado                            |       | StarTek USA  StarTek  StarTek Services             |
|                            |       |                                |       |                                               |
| StarTek Canada  Services, Ltd.  |       | Nova Scotia, Canada                 |       | StarTek Canada Services  StarTek  StarTek Services |
|                            |       |                                |       |                                               |
| StarTek  Holdings, Inc.    |       | Delaware                            |       | StarTek Holdings                                   |
|                            |       |                                |       |                                               |
| StarTek International,  Limited |       | Bermuda                             |       | StarTek International                              |
|                            |       |                                |       |                                               |
| StarTek Pacific, Ltd.           |       | Colorado                            |       | StarTek Pacific                                    |

 

----