alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2







Certification of the principal accounting officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of Trans Continental Entertainment Group, Inc.  (the Company).  I, Robert Alberty, Corporate Controller (principal accounting officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 14, 2003

By:

/s/ Robert Alberty



Robert Alberty



Corporate Controller



(principal accounting officer)
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1747

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude certain

Internet communications from the definition of expenditure.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 19, 1999

Mr. BENNETT (for himself, Mr. BURNS, and Mr. MCCONNELL) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on

Rules and Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

exclude certain Internet communications from the definition of expenditure.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Freedom Pro5 tection Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN INTERNET COMMUNICA7 TIONS FROM DEFINITION OF EXPENDITURE.

8 Section 301(9)(B) of the Federal Election Campaign

9 Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(9)(B)) is amended—
2

•S 1747 IS

1 (1) in clause (ix), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end;

2 (2) in clause (x), by striking the period at the

3 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

4 (3) by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(xi) any communication or dissemination of

6 material through the Internet (including electronic

7 mail, chat rooms, and message boards) by any indi8 vidual, if such material—

9 ‘‘(I) is not a paid advertisement;

10 ‘‘(II) does not solicit funds for, or on be11 half of, a candidate or political committee;

12 ‘‘(III) is disseminated for the purpose of

13 communicating or disseminating the opinion of

14 such individual (including an endorsement) re15 garding a political issue or candidate; and

16 ‘‘(IV) is not communicated or disseminated

17 by any individual that receives payment or any

18 other form of compensation for such commu19 nication or dissemination.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 12.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a)) OR RULE 15d-14(a) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)), PROMULGATED UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jérôme Arnaud, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of ILOG S.A.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 | By     |                              
|---------------- | ------ | -----------------------------
|October 13, 2006 | Name:  | Jérôme Arnaud                
|                 | Title: | Chief Financial Officer      
|                 |        | (principal financial officer)
|                 |        |
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 5, 2015 

# Order

May 5, 2015

151469 ( 20 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

BRANDON JASON FLAKES

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 151469

COA: 324126

Kent CC: 09

- 009629

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to file an

application for leave to appeal in excess of the page limit restriction is GRANTED. The

54

- page application submitted on April 22, 2015, is accepted for filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-6550

ERNEST G. FERGUSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM C. DUNCIL, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-91-1170)

Submitted: December 5, 1995 Decided: August 2, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Harless, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. William

Trask Douglass, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST

VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ferguson

v. Duncil, No. CA-91-1170 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 31, 1994). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Meggitt Safety Systems Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63732

)

Under Contract No. SPRDL1

- 19

- C

- 0289 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Franklin C. Turner, Esq.

Alexander W. Major, Esq.

Leah R. McCoy, Esq.

Philip Lee, Esq.

McCarter & English, LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Dana J. Chase, Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Joshua B. Fix, JA

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: February 20, 2024

DAVID B. STINSON

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63732

, Appeal of Meggitt Safety

Systems Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: F ebruary 20 , 2024

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 32



OVERSEAS PARTNERS LTD.

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Overseas Partners Ltd. (Company) certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 8, 2005



By:

/s/ Mark R. BridgesMark R. BridgesChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerBy:

/s/ Chris FlemingChris FlemingChief Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees at the Piqua Organic Moderated Reactor site in Piqua, Ohio, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On December 10, 2009, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

                            All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked at the Piqua Organic Moderated Reactor site during the covered period from May 2, 1966 through February 28, 1969, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for                                   ( print page 3470)                                one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.                        

This designation became effective on January 9, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on January 9, 2010, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-1088 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
Exhibit 31.1 — Sarbanes-Oxley — 302 Certifications
     I, Robert W. Anestis, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Florida East CoastIndustries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) [Reserved] c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: November 2, 2004 By: /s/ Robert W. Anestis Robert W. Anestis, Chief Executive Officer
36
.

Miller, Diane M. (CDC/NIOSH/EID)

From:
Sent: | Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:29 PM
To: NIOSH OCAS (CDC); NSSP; mailto:ocas@cdc.gov; NIOSH Docket Office (CDC); NIOSH Docket
Office (CDC); NIOSH Docket Office (CDC); NIOSH Docket Office (CDC)
Ce: Senator Ken Salazar; Senator Wayne Allard; ; imsea@RockyMountainNews.com;
* (ANWAG)

Subject: Comments Rocky Flats Worker

NIOCINDOCKET Office,

One major overlooked Item in Rocky Flats dose reconstruction isa
major concern of in accuracy of the
Dosimeter Badges and the locations they were to be worn on the white coveralls which the
Maintenance workers wore
with the badge clip was clipped on to down on right shoulder and an elastic strap to hold it
from moving and get into moving
Equipment. With this being the location every time the workers went into a Glove Box the
Lead lined Globe boxes and the
lead lined boxes shielded the badges from all different amount radiation and other rays at all
the different locations on plant
site from large amounts and greater amounts into the Neck and the Brain that was never
recorded on the badges we wore
Daily. Telephone interview | explained all this which no one listened to for it wasn't in my
dose reconstruction, epically one
job | did over and over handling PU and before doing the job Criticality Engineers had to
be called in to take readings to
make sure it didn't go critical and kill us all, for always a large amount of carriers were
broken off with PU Ingots in them.
The Criticality Engineer would put his Ludlum up to the glass and take a reading which says
and did look like it was just
clear glass therefore my neck and head received the full amount of his reading for up to
eight to sixteen hours to clear the :
blocked line and reinstall the Ingot Carriers back on the line at which time had to remove
the Ingot and install the carrier
back onto the chain conveyor and reinstall the Ingot. The same scenario played out over’
and over in all buildings which
had Lead Lined Glove Boxes in them with Lead Lined 15 and 30 MIL Gloves PROTECTING
THE DOSE BADGE
THEREFORE the Head and Necks of every individual on Site received way larger amount
of does than the badge received.
This is applicable to all other plants with the same type configurations of Glove Boxes
located in their Plant Sites. Their
is no way you can calculate with any kind of reliability anywhere as to what a person
received in exposure to their whole .
body except that one specific location where the Badge was worn, a Dose in percentage is
Physically Impossible for the

8/23/2007


Fago2ure

rest of the BODY. | would request you configure all Sites for S EC Cohart. The Cancers
already are listed in part of the

22 that you have listed for the Cohart, this is what Congress intended from the start |
believe. Would not have wasted so

many Millions of TAX PAYERS DOLLARS.

WITH GREAT RESPECT FOR MY FELLOW COMRADES,

cc: ”
Lamar Alexander
Bob Corker
Jim Cooper
Marsha Blackburn

8/23/2007
**Exhibit 12.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert A. Mionis, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Celestica Inc.;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   April 25, 2019 |                      |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | /s/   Robert A. Mionis    |
|                        | Robert   A. Mionis        |
|                        | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

1

----
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-65245, No. 333-65255, No. 333-31054, No.333-37456, No. 333-43510, No. 333-62940, No. 333-62942, No. 333-62946, No. 333-62948, No. 333-86810 and No. 333-98547 of Entrust, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated February 27, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Entrust, Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas

March 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1512
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             200
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  2000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      18440
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            3461
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              3483
<LOANS>                                          15555
<ALLOWANCE>                                        177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   42810
<DEPOSITS>                                       37112
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                453
<LONG-TERM>                                       1830
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           281
<OTHER-SE>                                        3134
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   42810
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    702
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  628
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    77
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  1407
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 659
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              659
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    285
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         285
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.62
<LOANS-NON>                                         24
<LOANS-PAST>                                        35
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   171
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  177
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               177
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>