alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1613

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel VICTORY OF BURHNAM.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 22, 1999

Mr. MACK (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

VICTORY OF BURHNAM.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United

8 States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue
2

•S 1613 IS

1 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse2 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

3 VICTORY OF BURHNAM, United States official num4 ber 663780.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 185 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 185

   To establish a Chief Agricultural Negotiator in the Office of the 
                  United States Trade Representative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

  Mr. Ashcroft (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Burns, Mr. 
Brownback, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish a Chief Agricultural Negotiator in the Office of the 
                  United States Trade Representative.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATOR.

    (a) Establishment of a Position.--There is established the position 
of Chief Agricultural Negotiator in the Office of the United States 
Trade Representative. The Chief Agricultural Negotiator shall be 
appointed by the President, with the rank of Ambassador, by and with 
the advice and consent of the Senate.
    (b) Functions.--The primary function of the Chief Agricultural 
Negotiator shall be to conduct trade negotiations and to enforce trade 
agreements relating to U.S. agricultural products and services. The 
Chief Agricultural Negotiator shall be a vigorous advocate on behalf of 
U.S. agricultural interests. The Chief Agricultural Negotiator shall 
perform such other functions as the United States Trade Representative 
may direct.
    (c) Compensation.--The Chief Agricultural Negotiator shall be paid 
at the highest rate of basic pay payable to a member of the Senior 
Executive Service.
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Technical Systems Integration, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62687-ADR

)

Under Contract No. N61331-18-D-0011 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael J. Gardner, Esq. 

Brett Castellat, Esq.

 Greenberg Traurig LLP

 McLean, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Raymond P. Oldach, Jr., Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 Naval Surface Warfare Center

 Panama City, FL

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled and the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal. 

The Board grants the motion and dismisses this appeal with prejudice.

Dated: July 13, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62687-ADR, Appeal of Technical 

Systems Integration, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 14, 2021 

DANIEL S. HERZFELD

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                              32
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                       435
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,900
<PP&E>                                         122,527
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,567
<BONDS>                                         35,884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,494
<SALES>                                         31,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,370
<CGS>                                           25,253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (118)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    382
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                363
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 19-1420

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Marcos Antonio Chavez Gonzalez lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________ Submitted: September 5, 2019 Filed: September 9, 2019 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Marcos Gonzalez appeals after he plead ed guilty to illegal reentry into the United States and the district court 1 sentenced him to a prison term below the calculated Guidelines range. We conclude that the district court im posed a substantively reasonable sentence. Gonzalez was sentenced below the calcula ted Guidelines range and there is no indication that the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committe d a clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461–62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing substantive reasonableness); see also United States v. McCauley , 715 F.3d 1119, 1127 (8th Cir. 2013) (where district court has varied below Guidelines range, it is “nearly inconceivabl e” that court abused its discretion in not varying downward still further). Having i ndependently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we gr ant counsel permission to withdraw.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 23667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Administrator today accepted a petition, and began review of a 
petition, for trade adjustment assistance by the Prune Bargaining 
Association on behalf of prune producers in California. A public 
hearing to review the merits of the petition will be held via 
teleconference on May 6, 2010, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time to receive oral 
comments associated with this petition.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Administrator will determine within 40 
days whether or not increasing imports of prune juice contributed 
importantly to a greater than 15 percent decrease in the national 
average price of prunes compared to the average of the three preceding 
marketing years. The petition maintains that California prune producers 
have suffered a greater than 15 percent decrease in the national 
average price due primarily to U.S. imports of prune juice (primarily 
in the form of prune juice concentrate) and, to a smaller degree, dried 
prunes. If a determination is affirmative, producers who produce and 
market prunes in California will be eligible to apply to the Farm 
Service Agency for cash benefits and technical assistance at no cost. 
Persons who wish to listen or speak at the hearing must register with 
the TAA Coordinator at (202) 720-0638 or (202) 690-0633, at least 24 
hours before the hearing. Presenters will be allotted time to speak via 
telephone and must dial 1 (800) 867-6144. When prompted for your 
conference code, please enter 4843 on your telephone keypad. Speakers 
should also submit a written summary of their remarks for the record by 
faxing them to (202) 720-0876.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trade Adjustment Assistance Staff, 
FAS, USDA, at (202) 720-0638, or by e-mail at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5327213237363237392620273e363d27133532207d262037327d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c686e7d78797d7876696f68717972685c7a7d6f32696f787d327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>. Additional program information can be 
obtained at the Web site for the Trade Adjustment Assistance for 
Farmers program. The URL is http://www.fas.usda.gov/itp/taa.

    Dated: April 28, 2010.
John D. Brewer,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-10439 Filed 5-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| 1. | to      the  best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | to      the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of Registrant. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November 12, 2010 |   | By:                                                         | /s/      Charles Adelman |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                        |   | Charles Adelman                                        |
|                        |   | President, Chief Executive Officer, and |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer                           |

----
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 V.

DANIEL KUUALOHA AUKAI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 04-10226

D.C. No. CR-03-00062-1-HG

ORDER

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this

court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to

Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent

by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent

adopted by the en banc court.

FILED

JAN 22 2007

CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Exhibit 3.3

                                    AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                                     BY-LAWS

                                       OF

                                  BLUEFLY, INC.

                             A Delaware Corporation

                                December 5, 2007

              Article 7 of the By-laws of Bluefly, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
is hereby amended as follows:

              1.     The By-laws of the corporation are hereby amended by
deleting Section 7.1 in its entirety, and replacing it with the following:

              Section 7.1.   Certificated and Uncertificated Shares. The shares
of capital stock of the Corporation may be certificated or uncertificated, as
provided under the General Corporation Law. Every holder of capital stock
represented by certificates and, upon request, every holder of uncertificated
shares shall be entitled to have a certificate signed by the Chairman, the
President or a Vice President and by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary or
the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer. The certificates may be impressed with
the seal of the Corporation or a facsimile thereof. The signatures of the
officers upon a certificate may be facsimiles, if the certificate is
countersigned by a transfer agent or registrar other than the Corporation itself
or its employee. In case any officer, transfer agent or registrar who has signed
or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon any certificate shall have
ceased to be such officer, transfer agent or registrar before such certificate
is issued, such certificate may, unless otherwise ordered by the Board, be
issued by the Corporation with the same effect as if such person were such
officer, transfer agent or registrar at the date of issue.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Connect Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken Waters, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
17th day of September, 2009. /s/
Ken Waters Ken
Waters, Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the undersigned  officers of Integrated Security Systems,  Inc. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30,
2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully  complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and the information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.


November 19, 2003                         /s/ C. A. RUNDELL, JR.
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          C. A. Rundell, Jr.,
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                          Executive and Financial Officer


November 19, 2003                         /s/ Richard B. Powell
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Richard B. Powell
                                          Principal Accounting Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by section 906 has been
provided to Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated
Security Systems,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

The  foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  as an exhibit to Form 10-QSB
pursuant  to  Item   601(b)(32)  of  Regulation  S-B  and  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB for  purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934, as amended,  and is not  incorporated  by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6268
ROBERT FROST, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MIKE D. ILLES, Administrator, in his official capacity and Individual capacity, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 05-6643
ROBERT FROST, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MIKE D. ILLES, Administrator, in his official capacity and Individual capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-04-943-8-17BI; CA-04-943-8-JFA) Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 5, 2005- 2 - Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Frost, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Robert Frost, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeFrost v. Illes , Nos. CA-04-943-8-17BI; CA-04- 943-8-JFA (D.S.C. filed Feb. 7, 2005 & entered Feb. 8, 2005; Mar. 23, 2005). We deny Frost’s motion for relief from judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES  As of December 31, 2009
 1.
    
    Hillman Group Capital Trust
Organized in the State of Delaware2.
    
    Hillman Investment Company
Incorporated in the State of Delaware3.
    
    The Hillman Group, Inc.
Incorporated in the State of Delaware
 a.
    
    All Points Industries, Inc.
Incorporated in the State of Floridab.
    
    SunSource Integrated Services de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Incorporated in Ciudad de Mexico, Mexicoc.
    
    The Hillman Group Canada, Ltd.
Incorporated in the Province of Ontario, Canadad.
    
    SunSub C, Inc.
Incorporated in the State of Delaware
EXHIBIT 32.1                                                                                                   CERTIFICATIONS







CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I, Roy H. Bubbs, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hooper Holmes, Inc.




Dated:  August 7, 2009









/s/ Roy H. Bubbs




__________________________




Roy H. Bubbs




Chief Executive Officer and President




This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1855 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1855

                To establish age limitations for airmen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 4, 1999

 Mr. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                To establish age limitations for airmen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGE AND OTHER LIMITATIONS.

    (a) General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, beginning 
on the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act--
            (1) section 121.383(c) of title 14, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, shall not apply;
            (2) no certificate holder may use the services of any 
        person as a pilot on an airplane engaged in operations under 
        part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, if that 
        person is 65 years of age or older; and
            (3) no person may serve as a pilot on an airplane engaged 
        in operations under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, if that person is 65 years of age or older.
    (b) Certificate Holder.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``certificate holder'' means a holder of a certificate to operate as an 
air carrier or commercial operator issued by the Federal Aviation 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```