alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING II, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                    DECEMBER 28, 2001                  DECEMBER 29, 2000                  DECEMBER 31, 1999
                          ----------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                            MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                              PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED        PREFERRED         PREFERRED        PREFERRED
                          CAPITAL TRUST II  FUNDING II, L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST II FUNDING II, L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST II FUNDING II, L.P.
                          ----------------  ----------------  ---------------- ----------------  ---------------- ----------------

<S>                        <C>                <C>                <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>

Earnings                         $ 24,742          $ 28,991            $ 24,742        $ 29,028           $ 24,742        $ 29,003
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========           ========        ========


Fixed charges                    $      -          $      -            $      -        $      -           $      -        $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution requirements         24,000            24,742              24,000          24,742             24,000          24,742
                                 --------          --------            --------        --------           --------        --------

Total combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements       $ 24,000          $ 24,742            $ 24,000        $ 24,742           $ 24,000        $ 24,742
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========           ========        ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                        1.03              1.17                1.03            1.17               1.03            1.17
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF ADVANCED GAMING TECHNOLOGY, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE 
RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              77
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      142
<ALLOWANCES>                                        86
<INVENTORY>                                         43
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   436
<PP&E>                                            2553
<DEPRECIATION>                                     583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10696
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3373)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9446
<SALES>                                           1155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1155
<CGS>                                              283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5630)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5630)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Cite as Brown v. Hall, 123 Ohio St.3d 381, 2009-Ohio-5592.] 

BROWN, APPELLANT, v. HALL, WARDEN, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as Brown v. Hall, 123 Ohio St.3d 381, 2009-Ohio-5592.] 

Habeas corpus — Remanded to appellate court for entry of judgment of dismissal 

— Appellate court erred in addressing merits when petition filed in county 

other than county in which petitioner is incarcerated. 

(No. 2009-0819 — Submitted October 20, 2009 — Decided October 29, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 2009 CA 00034, 

2009-Ohio-1349. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Stark County 

and remand the cause to that court to dismiss the habeas corpus petition of 

appellant, Felix Brown Jr. The court of appeals erred in addressing the merits of 

Brown’s habeas corpus claim because he incorrectly filed it in Stark County 

instead of the county in which he is incarcerated, Richland County. See R.C. 

2725.03 (“If a person restrained of his liberty is an inmate of a state benevolent or 

correctional institution, the location of which is fixed by statute and at the time is 

in the custody of the officers of the institution, no court or judge other than the 

courts or judges of the county in which the institution is located has jurisdiction to 

issue or determine a writ of habeas corpus for his production or discharge”). 

Even though Brown’s petition reached the same district court of appeals it would 

have had it been filed in the correct county, the court of appeals still lacked 

jurisdiction to determine the merits of Brown’s petition. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 

119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 17, citing Sevayega v. 

Bobby, Mahoning App. No. 03 MA 48, 2003-Ohio-6395, 2003 WL 22839346, ¶ 

4. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

Judgment reversed 

and cause remanded. 

 MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

 PFEIFER, J., concurs in judgment only. 

__________________ 

 Felix Brown Jr., pro se. 

 Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Gene D. Park, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee. 

______________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from the Hanford site, Richland, Washington, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Hanford site.                    

*Location:*                         Richland, Washington.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All personnel who were internally monitored (urine or fecal), who worked at the Plutonium Finishing Plant in the 200 Area.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1989.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-10706 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
Exhibit 12.1

| **KINETEK, INC.COMPUTATIONS OF THE RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES    (dollars in thousands)**  

**Year Ended December 31,**
**2004  **     
**2003  **     
**2002  **  Fixed Charges  Interest expense
$35,592      
$34,876      
$35,231    Rental expense included in fixed charges
     1,091                 1,004      
     1,110Total fixed charges
36,683      
35,880      
36,341 
     
 
     
Earnings 
     
Pre-tax income (loss)
(889)     
(4,820)     
4,023Plus:  fixed    charges
   36,683               35,880      
   36,341Total Earnings
$35,794 
$31,060 
$40,364 
     
 
     
Ratio of earnings to    fixed charges
    1.0       
0.9       
1.1   
      |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**  **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2005, for TNP Enterprises, Inc. ("Company"), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on August 8, 2005 ("Report"), I, Jeffry E. Sterba, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     theReport fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:   August 8, 2005 | By: | /s/Jeffry E. Sterba     |
|----------------------------------|-----|-------------------------|
|                                  |     | Jeffry E. Sterba        |
|                                  |     | Chairman, President and |
|                                  |     | Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 15.(a).1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-11848 and 333-138200 on Form F-3 of our report dated April 30, 2014, relating to the financial statements of G. Willi-Food International Ltd. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of G. Willi-Food International Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2013.





/s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.


Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.


A Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu


Tel-Aviv, Israel


April 30, 2014
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70527) pertaining to the Globecomm Systems Inc. 1997
Stock Incentive Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-54622) pertaining to the Globecomm
Systems Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated August 26, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Globecomm
Systems Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June
30, 2002.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Melville, New York
September 30, 2002
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-11095 

(Summary Calendar)

__________________

JACKIE COWART,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CITY OF, A Texas

Incorporated Municipality, ET AL.,

 Defendants,

DICK FUNK, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, In

his representative capacity only, ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(USDC No. 6:94-CV-068-C)

- - - - - - - - - -

May 16, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The defendants never presented a legally relevant claim of

qualified immunity to the district court or offered summaryjudgment evidence responsive to the plaintiff's factual allegations

supporting his claims of individual liability. This court lacks

appellate jurisdiction. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 531

(1985); 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,849-01

EX P ARTE ENRIQUE GONZ ALEZ, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 12-CRD- 36-A IN THE 229 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM DUV AL COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant filed this a

pplication for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler

k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. According to t he rec ord, the trial court held an evidentiar y hear ing on November 19 and 21, 20 1 9 , b u t t h e transcr ipt of t he hearing was not forwa rded to this Court. Un d er Article 11.07 of t he Tex as C ode of Criminal Procedur e, a repor ter is require d to transcr ibe a h earing within fiftee n day s of its conclusion an d t h en to immediately forwa rd the transcr ipt to the district cler k in the county of conviction. Id

. at § 3(d). After r ece iving the tr anscr ipt, the district clerk is re quired to for war d it, among other thing s, to this C ourt. Id .; see also T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). The dist rict clerk s hall serve the reporter in Applicant’s case w i t h a copy of t his order and2

then either forwa

rd to this Court the transcr ipt of the evidentiar y hear ing or cer

tify in writing that the repor ter has not transcr ibed the hear ing. The district cler k shall comply with this order within thirty day s from the da

te of this order

.
Filed: January

30, 2020 Do not publish
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 01, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 01, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24A1301. MAYDELIN MARTELL AGENCY, LLC v. ORION RESTORATION - 

STORM DIVISION, LLC .

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
SunSource Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-53121, 333-53123 and 333-63409) of our
report dated February 9, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of SunSource Inc. as of December
31, 1999 and 1998, and for the three years in the period ending December
31,1999, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OVERSEAS'
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          249,700
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            304,078
<EQUITIES>                                   1,019,243
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,982,518
<CASH>                                         321,878
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          79,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,053,850
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                427,564
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            331,420
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                852,673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,700
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,053,850
<PREMIUMS>                                     684,720
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             58,808
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              44,190
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 205,769
<BENEFITS>                                     277,020
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     79,120
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                229,261
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            219,132
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   219,132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0<F1>
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNTS FOR SECURITIES ACT INDUSTRY GUIDE 6 AND EXCHANGE ACT INDUSTRY GUIDE 4
DISCLOSURES ARE REQUIRED FOR ANNUAL FILINGS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, NO AMOUNTS WILL
BE REPORTED FOR INTERIM FILINGS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 25268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0487]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Guidance on Informed Consent for In 
Vitro Diagnostic Device Studies Using Leftover Human Specimens That Are 
Not Individually Identifiable

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Guidance on Informed Consent For 
In Vitro Diagnostic Device Studies Using Leftover Human Specimens That 
Are Not Individually Identifiable'' has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Gittleson, Office of 
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-5156, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a5e7b74737f76345d736e6e767f6975745a7c7e7b34727269347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="074366696e626b29406e73736b6274686947616366296f6f7429606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of January 19, 2010 
(75 FR 2868), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0582. 
The approval expires on February 28, 2013. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: May 4, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-10782 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>