alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT  4.1


             ------------------------------------------------------
               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
             ------------------------------------------------------

------                                                           --------------
  No.                                                                 Shares
------                                                           --------------
                               The State of Nevada

[LOGO]
                             Navigator Venturs, Inc.
        One Forty Five Million Common Shares Authorized, $0.001 Par Value

This Certifies That SPECIMEN is the owner of ______________________ Common
Shares $0.001 par value each of the Capital Stock of

                            Navigator Ventures, Inc.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers, and to be sealed with the Seal of the
Corporation this ______ day of _____________ At

[SEAL]


-------------------------                               -----------------------
       President                                               Secretary

                               -------- ---------
                               SHARES $0.001 EACH
                               -------- ---------



                                   CERTIFICATE
                                       FOR

                                     SHARES

                               [SEAL APPEARS HERE]

                                     OF THE

                                  CAPITAL STOCK


                            Navigator Ventures, Inc.

                                    ISSUED TO


                                      DATED



         For Value Received ______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Shares of the Capital Stock represented by the written Certificate and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint __________________________________________ to
transfer the said Stock on the books of the within named corporation with full
power of substitution in the premises.

Dated _________________________

In presence of _______________________

NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN
ON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION AND
ENLARGEMENTS OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER
Filed 9/3/24 In re N.E. CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions 

not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion 

has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re N.E., a Person Coming 

Under the Juvenile Court Law.

2d Juv. No. B332881

(Super. Ct. No. SJ0304A)

(Los Angeles County)

THE PEOPLE,

 Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

N.E.,

 Defendant and Appellant.

N.E. appeals from a dispositional order after the juvenile 

court found true allegations that he committed second degree 

burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and felony vandalism (id., § 594, 

subd. (a).) Appellant vandalized elementary school classrooms by 

splattering paint throughout them, including on desks, chairs, 

and class materials. The court declared appellant a ward of the 
2

court and ordered him committed to the custody of probation for 

placement at Dorothy Kirby Center, under terms and conditions. 

We appointed counsel to represent appellant. Counsel 

examined the record and filed an opening brief requesting the 

court review this case independently under People v. Wende

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). (See In re Kevin S. (2003) 113 

Cal.App.4th 97, 99 [Wende procedure applies in juvenile 

delinquency appeals].) On May 7, 2024, we advised appellant by 

mail that he had 30 days to personally submit any contentions or 

arguments he wished us to consider. We have received no 

response from appellant.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that 

appellant’s counsel has fully complied with her responsibilities 

and that no arguable issue exists. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at 

p. 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)

The juvenile court’s dispositional order is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

CODY, J.

We concur:

YEGAN, Acting P. J. 

BALTODANO, J.
3

Susan Ser, Judge

Superior Court County of Los Angeles

______________________________

Elana Goldstein, under appointment by the Court of 

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Los Alamos National Laboratory.                    

*Location:*                         Los Alamos, New Mexico.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         March 15, 1943 through December 31, 1975.                    

      ( print page 24958)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-10705 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
uv\WvoV\ Assessvoa ) f Q^ ^ \%cceV \b*\cof<a ^exMOO

V,

\). The £\c^ ^ Te*c^> 

## )\ lO\VV. ^W\Vvcw\ j \ ^-tovyn COURTOFCRIMINAL APPEALS JUL 13 2011 

### X 

## £ FILED \N COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS (v i\ V JUL 14 2015 Abel Acosta, Clerk

## y^vvw VV^ C^A^^^^Tjf ***** lW^r\o ^«,<k«v\ WeX3^v^^oflbftU -v 

## tfo-v ^o.5 ¥;\edl, o*A\I^Tr u^ f ^*'4' •ever
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000741513
<NAME>                                      PS PARTNERS III, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1
<CURRENCY>                                                 U.S. $
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-1-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                 1
<CASH>                                                    532,000
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              89,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          621,000
<PP&E>                                                 81,657,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (32,534,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         55,390,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,101,000
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                             25,920,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           55,390,000
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,785,000
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           1,529,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          835,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           763,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       763,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              763,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                5.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                5.13
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

G2 Global Solutions, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63415

)

Under Contract No. HHM402

- 17

- C

- 0113 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Isaias Cy Alba, IV, Esq.

Kevin T. Barnett, Esq.

PilieroMazza PLLC

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney

CPT Dmitrius R

. McGruder, JA

Robert B. Neill, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 14, 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63415

, Appeal of G2

Global Solutions, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: September 14, 2023 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-11095 (Summary Calendar)

__________________ JACKIE COWART, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CITY OF, A Texas Incorporated Municipality, ET AL., Defendants, DICK FUNK, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, In his representative capacity only, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 6:94-CV-068-C)

- - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The defendants never presented a legally releva nt claim of
qua lified immunity to the district court or offered summaryjudgment evidence responsive to the plaintiff's factual allegations supporting his claims of indivi dual liability. This court lacks appellate jurisdiction. M itchell v. Forsyth , 47 2 U.S. 511, 531 (1985); 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,934,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,020,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,034,000
<PP&E>                                       1,267,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 230,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,109,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,523,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        9,943,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     594,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,109,000
<SALES>                                      4,951,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,951,000
<CGS>                                        3,766,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,884,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,259,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,257,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  63,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,194,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.82)



</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 2 3
- 7210

THOMAS D. ALEXANDER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. TODD E. ISHEE; TERESA R. O ’ BRIEN; CHAIRMAN, NC Post

- Release and Parole Commission , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. ( 5:23

- ct

- 03258

- BO )

Submitted : April 18, 2024 Decided: May 14, 2024

Before KING and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges , and KEENAN , Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Thomas D. Alexander , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7210 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/14/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM : Thomas D. Alexander, a North Carolina inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order (TRO) and dismissing his equal protection claim. Before addressing the merits of
Al exander’s appeal, we first must be assured that we have jurisdiction. Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015). We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1 292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). Final orders are those “that end the litigation on the merits and leave nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.” Porter , 803 F.3d at 696 (cleaned up). An order denying a preliminary injunction is an immediately appealable interlocutory order. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). However, we lack jurisdiction to review the denial of a TRO. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. v. Am. Fed’n of Gov’t Emps. , 473 U.S. 1301, 1303

- 05 (1985); Drudge v. McKernon , 482 F.2d 1375, 1376 (4th Cir. 1973) (per curiam). Because a “court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse party,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(1), and Alexander did not provide Defendants any notice , we construe Alexander’s motion as having requested only a TRO whose denial we lack jurisdiction to review . And because the equal protection claim was one of two claims Alexander raised in his complaint and this case remains pending in the district court, the dismissal of the equal protection claim was only a partial dismissal of the complaint , which we also lack jurisdiction to review

. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Porter , 803 F.3d at 696 (explaining that USCA4 Appeal: 23-7210 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/14/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 “a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7210 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/14/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  9
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>   3,039
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>  6,519
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>  34,379
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>  7,705
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>    7,883
<LOANS>  111,217
<ALLOWANCE>   1,882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>     166,404
<DEPOSITS>    133,910
<SHORT-TERM>  8,501
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>     2,127
<LONG-TERM>   0
<COMMON> 2,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>   0
<PREFERRED>   0
<OTHER-SE>    19,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>    166,404
<INTEREST-LOAN>    4,711
<INTEREST-INVEST>  1,380
<INTEREST-OTHER>   0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>   6,091
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT> 2,495
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 99
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>   3,497
<LOAN-LOSSES> (32)
<SECURITIES-GAINS> 542
<EXPENSE-OTHER>    2,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>    2,076
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>   1,462
<EXTRAORDINARY>    0
<CHANGES>     0
<NET-INCOME>  1,462

<EPS-PRIMARY> 1.64
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>     4.11
<LOANS-NON>   440
<LOANS-PAST>  0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>    2,503
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>   1,850
<CHARGE-OFFS> 4
<RECOVERIES>  36
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>  1,882
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>    1,882
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED> 1,398
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                             192,333
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      280,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   465,851
<PP&E>                                           2,133,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,837,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     790,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,364,823
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            17,194
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,603,482)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       790,783
<SALES>                                            911,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   911,994
<CGS>                                              358,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   762,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (173,702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (173,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (173,702)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Mutch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that except for
(i) the omission of the selected financial information required by Item 6 of Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999, and (ii) the failure to timely file
the report, the Annual Report of Peregrine Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Peregrine Systems, Inc.

Date: April 30, 2004/s/JOHN MUTCHJohn Mutch
Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Peregrine Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Peregrine Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

---



QuickLinks