# The Attorney General of Texas March 5, 1980

Honorable Bill M. White Criminal District Attorney Bexar County Courthouse San Antonio, Texas 78205 Dear Mr.White: Opinion No. MN-144 Re: Edwards Underground Water District Taxing Authority.

Youhave requested our opinion on the following three questions: 1.

2.

3. Does the Edwards Underground Water District have the authority to levy taxes in any year in an amount less than the statutory rate of two cents per one hundred dollars assessed valuation? If the Edwards Underground Water District has the authority to levy taxes in an amount less than two cents per one hundred dollars assessed valuation, does the District have the authority to levy such tax in different amounts in the five counties ofthe District inany one year? If the Edwards Underground Water District is not authorized to levy taxes in an amount less then two cents per one hundred dollars assessed valuation, is the District subject to the provisions of the Truth in Taxation’ statute, TEX. REV.CIVILSTAT.ANN., Article 7244c? Legislation creating the Edwards Underground Water District was enacted inHouse Bill 7,Acts 1959,of the 56th Legislature (formerly cited as article 8280-219, V.T.C.S.). The act provides in section 10,relating to the “Levy and Collection of Taxes IIthat t The District

... Is hereby authorized to levy an annual tax in each calendar year upon all property subject to District taxation of two cents (2d)on each

p. 462Honorable Bill M.White - Page Two (Mw-144)

One Hundred Dollars ($100)of assessed valuation based upon the valuation oftaxable property for county tax purposes meach ofthe county areas within the District; that is, the District shall adopt for each county or all of that part of a County in the District, e County tax roll and tax valuations for the current year for the lands and other taxable property located within each county area. Acts 1959,56th Leg., ch. 99,at 177. (Bmphasis added). Section 11ofthe act relates to “Voting ofAdditional Tax,” and permits sn increase in the tax rate, providing that

an election may be held within such county area [within the
‘D’is’trictlfor the purpose ofvoting upon and authorizing the levy of taxes in addition to the two cents (2d) per One Hundred Dollars ($100) as heremabove provided, but not to exceed sn additional annual tax oftwenty-three (23d) on the One Hundred Dollars ($100) of the County valuations of property subject to District taxation within a county area included in the District. Said additional taxes may be voted and thereafter collected in one or more county areas, whether or not other county areas in the Dtstrtct vote addtttonal taxes. (Emphasis added).

The clear language of section 10establishes authority for the District to levy sn annual tax “oftwo cents (2d)”oneach $100assessed valuation “based upon the valuation of taxable property for county tax purposes in each of the county areas within the District;

...‘I This unequivocal and unqualified language permits no inference that the District may levy e tax of either less or more than this fixed amount, unless authority can be found elsewhere in the statute. Section 11 underscores the minimum nature of the twocent rate established by section 10,by setting out a procedure for an increase in the amount which may belevied, upto an additional 23cents per $100assessed valuation. In all cases the District is instructed to “adopt for each county or all ofthat part of a county in the District, the County tax roll and tax valuations for the current year for the lands and other taxable property located within each county area.” Sec. 10. This language in section 10is equally unequivocal and expresses the intent of the legislature that the District bebound bythe tax rolls and valuations established in each ofthe various counties which lie wholly or partly within the district. Therefore, the District has no discretion to charge varying rates or to adjust valuations within the District for any purpose, except asprovided insection ll. Section 11allows for disparity only in the rate imposed, and then only in an amount “in addition to the two cents (2d).

..as hereinabove provided [insection 101.”Disparity in the rates between the counties ispermitted ifproperly approved by the Board ofDirectors of the District and authorized byaproperly conducted election within the affected county

P. 463. .

Honorable Bill M.White - Page Three (Mw-144)

area within the District, “whether ornot other county areas in the District vote additional t2XeS.” Article 7244c, V.T.C.S., relates to “Increases in effective tax rate by Ial taxing unit,” and sets out the procedure for calculating the effective tax rate, the limitations on increasing the effective tax rate, the requirement of a public hearing together with the notice and procedure for conducting the hearing, and the requirement and method of notice ofreappraisal. Inaddition, section 6ofthe article &fines ataxing unit affected as “a special district

. .. that is authorized to impose and is imposing ad valorem taxes on property.” Clearly, the Edwards Underground Water District comes within this definition, and is bound by the notice and hearing requirement imposed by the article when the tax rate is effectively increased, because it isrequired to formally “adopt” its mandated rate and the respective counties’ valuations annually, even though the district lacks authority or discretion to alter downward either the statutory rate or the county valuations which may result in aneffective increase inthe rate. Section 4(d) of article 7244~ states that “The governing body of a taxing unit may decrease the official tax rate for the current year at any time.” However the caption of section 4relates it to “adoption of Increased Tax Rate” this language is included for the purpose of permitting any affected taxing authority which has discretion to do so, to reduce its effective tax rate without the burden of the notice and hearing requirements imposed for anincrease inthe rate. It does not supersede or override the mandatory twocent rate set out in the act creating the district. The statutory scheme established for the Edwards Underground Water District by the legislature leaves the District with the options only of levying a tax at the two cent rate in any given year, based onthe assessed valuations of the respective county areas in the District, ofincreasing the rate byfollowing a stated procedure or of levying no tax at all throughout the District in e given year. Any alterations or additional options in this statutory scheme must beprovided bythe legislature. SUMMARY The Edwards Underground Water District does not have authority to levy taxes in any year in an amount less than the statutory rate of two cents per one hundred dollars assessedvaluation. Statutory language permitting the District to levy taxes in different amounts in the five county areas of the District in any one year pertains only to increases in the tax rate above the statutory two cent rate. The District is subject to the provisions of the “Truth in Taxation” statute, article 7244c, V.T.C.S., even though it lacks authority or discretion to alter the rate and valuations to avoid an increase in the effective rate.

P. 464Honorable Bill M.White - Page Four (NN-144)

MARK WHITE Attorney General ofTexas JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General TEDL.HARTLEY Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared byBobGammage Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMI’ITEE C.Robert Heath, Chairman Jim Allison David B.Brooks BobGammage Susan Garrison Rick Gilpin Myra McDaniel

p. 465