alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                          230,547
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   247,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                     17,000
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                508,324
<PP&E>                                        2,112,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,763,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  885,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,462,411
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         17,194
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1,606,531)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    885,322
<SALES>                                         466,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                466,084
<CGS>                                           233,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                489,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               64,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (217,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (217,847)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (217,847)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.01)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1615 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1615

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel ENTERPRIZE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 1999

 Mr. Mack (for himself and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel ENTERPRIZE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel ENTERPRIZE, United 
States official number 1077571.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1781 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1781

To amend the Act that established the Keweenaw National Historical Park 
   to require the Secretary of the Interior to consider nominees of 
various local interests in appointing members of the Keweenaw National 
                  Historical Park Advisory Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 25, 1999

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Act that established the Keweenaw National Historical Park 
   to require the Secretary of the Interior to consider nominees of 
various local interests in appointing members of the Keweenaw National 
                  Historical Park Advisory Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENTS TO KEWEENAW NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ADVISORY 
              COMMISSION.

    Section 9(c)(1) of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the 
Keweenaw National Historical Park, and for other purposes'' (Public Law 
102-543; 16 U.S.C. 410yy-8(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``from 
nominees'' each place it appears and inserting ``after consideration of 
nominees.''
                                 <all>
```
FILE COPY 

# Court ofAppeals Third District of Texas P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711-2547 www.txcourts.gov/3fidcoa.aspx (512) 463-1733

J. WOODFIN JONES. CHIEF JUSTICE DAVID PURYEAR. JUSTICE BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE JEFF L. ROSE, JUSTICE MELISSA GOODWIN. JUSTICE SCOTT K. FIELD. JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE. CLERK



### Ms. Emily Newell 

### Westgate Building, Suite 313 1122 Colorado Street TX, 78701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: 

### Court ofAppeals Number: Trial Court Case Number: December 12,2014 

### Ms. Mary E. Allen 

### General Delivery 

## 823 Congress Suite 150 ^ Austin, TX 78701 ^0g
03-14-00670-CV C-l-CV-14-007235 

### Style: Mary E. Allen 

### v. WellsBranch Self Storage o

at

ro en o 3D rn O o 33 Dear Counsel: 

### OnDecember 11, 2014, the one-volume clerk's record was filed inthis Court. 

## Pleasebe advised appellant's docketing statementis pastdue and mustbe submittedas soon as possible. Very truly yours, JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

cc: The Honorable Dana DeBcauvoir BY: I ff/y//sr,/t'/ ( '//*•/£,; 

### Courtland Crocker, Deputy Clerk

Case # C-1-CV-14-or>7?-« 

# '"iniinti 000930191
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 03, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 03, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A0056. IN THE INTEREST OF T. R., A CHILD .
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 333-56829, No. 333-89465, No. 333-108119 and No. 333-144440 on Form S-8, and Registration Statements No. 333-90321, No. 333-32756, No. 333-47600 and No. 333-113930 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 11,2008 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of FIN 48 and SFAS No. 123(R)) relating to the financial statements of CuraGen Corporation and the effectiveness of CuraGen Corporation’sinternal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CuraGen Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Hartford, Connecticut 

March 11, 2008
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Metalline Mining Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the period ended October 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, WayneL. Schoonmaker, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Wayne  L. Schoonmaker  |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Secretary  and Treasurer   |
|                       |
|                       |
| Dated:  September 15, 2005 |

 

E-5

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I James M. McNamee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 9, 2004



/s/ James M. McNameeJames M. McNameeChairman, President andChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT 2002**

** **

This certification isnot to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and does not constitute a part of the Amendment No.1 to the AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A of UTStarcom, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”).

 

Inconnection with the Report, we, Peter Blackmore and Kenneth Luk, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:April 27, 2010

 
| By:    | /s/ PETER BLACKMORE                                        |       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
|   | Name: Peter Blackmore                                      |       |
|   | Title: *Chief Executive Officer*                           | ** ** |
|   |                                                       |
| By:    | /s/ KENNETH LUK                                            |       |
|   | Name: Kenneth Luk                                          | ** ** |
|   | Title: *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |       |

 

----
# I 

# \' ( Anton Purisima, Plaintiff,
v. Andre McBride 

### etal., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# filED JUN 1 92012 Clerk, 

### U.s. District Courts torthe Dist
.&Bankruptcy net ot Columbia 

# 12 0990

This matter is before the Court on review ofplaintiffsprose complaint and application to proceed informapauperis. The application will be granted and this action will be dismissed
as time-barred. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (requiring dismissal "at any time" ofa complaint that fails to state a claim upon which reliefmay be granted). Plaintiff, a resident ofNewYork, New York, has submitted a complaint for personal injuries allegedly suffered on June 2, 2008, when plaintiff, while crossingthe street in the District ofColumbia, was allegedly hit by defendant on a motorcycle. Compl. at 1. The instant complaint is based on the same events underlying the nearly identical complaint this Court dismissed on September 15, 2010, for plaintiffs failure to prosecute. See Compl., Purisima v. McBride, 09-cv-1065 (RMU). Under District ofColumbia law, a personal injury action must be brought within one or three years ofits accrual, depending on the facts ofthe case. See D.C. Code§ 12-301(4), (8). Referring to the dismissed complaint, plaintiffstates that "[t]his case is timely filed due to the underlying case was filed on June 1, 2009 within one (1) year from the incident on June 2,2008." 1 Compl.**~** 6. But "underDistrict ofColumbia law, the pendency ofan action involuntarily dismissed [with or] without prejudice does not operate to toll the running ofthe statute oflimitations." Dupree v. Jefferson, 666 F.2d 606,611 (D.C. Cir. 1981); see accord Melara 

### v. ChinaNorth Industries, Corp., 658 F. Supp. 2d 178, 181 (D.D.C. 2009) ("plaintiff cannot assert an equitable tolling defense based on the timely filing ofa claim that was later dismissed withoutprejudice"). Since "the outermost limit" under the District's statute of limitations was three years from plaintiffs accrual date ofJune 2, 2008, Dupree, 666 F.2d at 611, the instant complaint received more than four years later on June 4, 2012, comes too late. See id. ("In the case at bar, whateverthe limitation period applicable, it was not arrested during pendency ofappellant's first action which was involuntarily dismissed without prejudice for want ofprosecution.") A separate Order ofdismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

# f_(L- 

# SHudL United States District Judge Date: June

# ~

# h,2012

1 Plaintiffalso asserts that the limitations period was "tolled in the related social security case filing
...in U.S.D.C., Southern District ofNew York wherein the incident (motorcycle) was part ofthe case therein." Compl.**~** 6. Even iftrue, this Court is not bound by the rulings of judges in the Southern District ofNew York. 2
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the undersigned  officers of Integrated Security Systems,  Inc. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information  contained  in the  Form  10-Q  fairly  presents,  in  all  material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.


Date:    May 12, 2004                     /s/ C. A. RUNDELL, JR.
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          C. A. Rundell, Jr.
                                          Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                          Executive and Financial Officer



Date:    May 12, 2004                     /s/ RICHARD B. POWELL
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Richard B. Powell
                                          Principal Accounting Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by section 906 has been
provided to Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated
Security Systems,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

The  foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  as an exhibit to Form 10-QSB
pursuant  to  Item   601(b)(32)  of  Regulation  S-B  and  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB for  purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934, as amended,  and is not  incorporated  by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATINGS INCLUDED IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 28, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-28-2000
<CASH>                                          20,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,640
<PP&E>                                          52,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,684
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,620
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,307
<SALES>                                         53,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,815
<CGS>                                           33,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,708
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I  Fred Lash, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

                    (i)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                    (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

|   | /s/   FRED LASH                                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **Fred Lash Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer** |

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TouchIT Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Recep Tanisman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  November 17, 2010
By:
/s/ Recep TanismanName: Recep TanismanTitle:  Chief Executive Officer
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00136-CV

2003 CHEVROLET 1500 PU, VIN #1GCEC19T63Z252738, ET AL., Appellants

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 62nd District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV41739

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jeremy Banks, appellant, filed his notice of appeal October 22, 2013. The clerk’s record 

in this matter was due to be filed with this Court on or before December 2, 2013. The clerk’s 

record has not been filed, and there is no indication that Banks has made any effort to obtain a 

record. On January 8, our clerk’s office wrote to Banks warning him that as he is not indigent,

he is responsible for payment of the fees related to preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1, 35.3(a)(2), (b)(3), 37.3(b). We also reminded Banks that the $195.00 filing fee has 

not been paid for his appeal.

By letter dated January 8, 2014, and pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

37.3(b) and 42.3(b), we provided Banks notice of and an opportunity to cure these defects and 

warned him that if we did not receive an adequate response to our defect letter within ten days, 

then this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b). 

An additional twenty-five days have now elapsed without response or action by Banks. 

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.3(b) and 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for 

want of prosecution. See id.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: February 6, 2014

Date Decided: February 7, 2014