alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)

        I, Patrick C. Barry, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bluefly, Inc;

        2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual report;

        4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

                a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

                b. [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition
instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986];

                c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting

        5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

                a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information ; and

                b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date:  March 1, 2005
                                                     /s/ Patrick C. Barry
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Patrick C. Barry
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I Fred Lash, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 9, 2004



/s/ Fred LashFred LashSenior Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Entrust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                     |  |        |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 6, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ David J. Wagner
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                     |  | Name:  |  | David J. Wagner        
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
----

|   | 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in  all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.13

                         [Letterhead NYCOMED AMERSHAM]

19th February, 2001
                                              Nycomed Amersham plc

Company Secretary                             Amersham Place
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Limited            Little Chalfont
Amersham Place                                Buckinghamshire
Little Chalfont                               HP7 9NA England
Bucks HP7 9NA                                 T +44 (0) 1494 544000
                                              F +44 (0) 1494 542266


Attention: J.A. Cooper

Dear Sir,

GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -- 4TH AUGUST, 1997 (THE "AGREEMENT") -- PROPOSED
AMENDMENT

As you are aware, we are in the process of making a public offering of
approximately 10% of the common stock which we currently hold in Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech Limited (or any successor company following a reorganisation
of the common stock) ("APBiotech").

With reference to Clause 8.7 of the Agreement, it has been agreed that in
future the circumstances in which Nycomed Amersham plc shall be entitled to
terminate the Agreement on three months' notice shall be when Nycomed Amersham
ceases to have the right to nominate the majority of the Board of Directors of
APBiotech, rather than on ceasing to have a direct or indirect interest in at
least 50% of the voting rights attaching to the stock of APBiotech.

Clause 8.7 shall therefore be amended as follows:

"8.7  International may terminate this Agreement on three months' notice ending
      on or after the date on which International ceases to have the right to
      nominate the majority of the Board of Directors of Biotech."

Please acknowledge agreement by countersigning this letter and returning it
to me.

Yours sincerely,


/s/ G.F.B. Kerr
------------------
G.F.B. Kerr
Finance Director                        Agreed:
                                        /s/ J.A. Cooper
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        J.A. Cooper
                                        For Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Limited
EXHIBIT 10.3

                                    CONTRACT

This agreement is made as of June 31, 1998, between Ernie Farris of 1721 SW
Mockingbird Drive, St. Lucie, FL 34986 (the "Consultant"), and Cyber Public
Relations, Inc., a Florida corporation, with a registered address at 1721 SW
Mockingbird Dr., St. Lucie, FL 34986 ("CPR").

WHEREAS the Consultant has agreed to perform certain services for the
corporation that the corporation requires and as such the parties have agreed to
the following terms and conditions.

1.       The Consultant will provide CPR with Resident Agent Services and also
         provide his address for use by CPR as its Registered Office in the
         State of Florida for a period of at lease one year from the date of
         this agreement.

2.       The Consultant will provide CPR with mail forwarding services and allow
         CPR to use his address for such purposes for a period of at least one
         year from the date of this agreement.

3.       College will pay $250.00 to the Consultant in exchange for the services
         provided by the Consultant.

4.       Both parties agree that College will pay all invoices from the
         Consultant in common shares in the capital stock of College at a deemed
         value of $0.01 per share in reliance on Regulation D Rule 504.


CYBER PUBLIC RELATIONS. INC..               ERNIE FARRIS



/s/ Maria Trinh                             /s/ Ernie Farris
------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
Maria Trinh, President
Exhibit 8.1

Celestica
Cayman Holdings 1 Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation.
Celestica Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
Celestica Holdings Pte Ltd., a Singapore corporation.
Celestica Hong Kong Limited, a Hong Kong corporation.
Celestica Liquidity Management Hungary Limited Liability Company, a Hungary corporation.
Celestica (Gibraltar) Limited, a Gibraltar corporation.
Celestica (Luxembourg) S.ÀR.L., a Luxembourg corporation.
Celestica (Thailand) Limited, a Thailand corporation.
Celestica (USA) Inc., a Delaware corporation.
Celestica (US Holdings) Inc., a Delaware corporation.
IMS International Manufacturing Services Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation.
1282087 Ontario Inc., an Ontario corporation.

---
1

TRACIE HALBROOK,

FORMER WIFE,

Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM BENJAMIN 

DOUGLASS, FORMER 

HUSBAND,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5694

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 11, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

Robert A. Sandow, Lake City, for Appellant.

Leonard E. Ireland, Jr., Clayton-Johnston, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
***Exhibit 31.1******CERTIFICATIONS***     I, Thomas D. Vance, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of First McMinnville Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.May 11, 2007     /s/ Thomas D. Vance President and CEO
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

 

 National Institute for Occupational

 Safety and Health

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998

 Phone: 877-222-7570

 Fax: 513-533-6826

 

 August 24, 2010

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00056

Ms. Rachel Leiton

Division of Energy Employees Occupational

Illness Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

Room C-4511

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20210

Dear Ms. Leiton:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Bethlehem Steel facility in Lackawanna, New York, as an addition to 

the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000. On July 14, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), 

the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at the Bethlehem Steel Corporation 

facility in Lackawanna, New York from January 1, 1949 to December 31, 1952, for a number 

of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this 

employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or 

more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on August 13, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on August 13, 2010, members of this class of employees, defined 

as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

 Sincerely,

 [Signature on file]

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director

 Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(November 19, 1898.)

#### CORNWELL v. CARTER.

[55 Pac. 1100.]

See syllabus in case of *Cornwell v. McCoy,*ante, p. 219; that opinion governs this ease.

APPEAL from District Court, Nez Perces County.

J. E. Ba.bb, for Appellant.

Same brief as in *Cornwell v. McCoy.*

S. C. Herren, for Eespondent.

Same brief as in case of *Cornwell v. McCoy.*

*223HUSTON J.

— This case arising upon the same state of facts as *Cornwell v.*McCoy, ante, p. 219, 55 Pac. 210, it was stipulated by counsel that the decision in that case should control in this. Judgment of district court reversed, with costs to appellant. Cause remanded to district court, with instructions to-enter judgment for plaintiff as prayed in complaint.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 87 (Thursday, May 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24941-24942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Project No. 13715-000]


Osprey III, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

April 29, 2010.
    On April 15, 2010, Osprey III, LLC filed an application, pursuant 
to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the 
feasibility of the Morgan Dam Hydroelectric Project (Morgan Dam 
Project), to be located on the Sebasticook River in the Town of 
Hartland, Somerset County, Maine.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) An existing 29-foot-high 
concrete dam containing three sluice gates with a 100-foot-long, 25-
foot-high spillway; (2) the existing 1,728-acre Great Moose Lake; (3) a 
new powerhouse containing multiple turbine generator units with total 
installed capacity of 1.0 megawatts (MW); (4) a new transmission line 
connecting to an existing Central Maine Power distribution line located 
in the Town of Hartland; and (5) appurtenant facilities. The project 
would produce an estimated average annual generation of about 5,000 
megawatt-hours, which would be sold directly to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Hoon Won, 275 River Road, P.O. Box 202, 
Woolwich, Maine 04579, (207) 443-9747.
    FERC Contact: John Ramer, (202) 502-8969.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications

[[Page 24942]]

(without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file competing 
applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. Comments, 
motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing applications may 
be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at  http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at  http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13715) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10631 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PEDRO ALONSO GONZALES,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ROBERT AYERS, Warden, official

capacity,

 Defendant,

 and

SCHUTZER, PHD Surgeon, official

capacity; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-55118

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02903-DSF-SP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

FILED

FEB 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-55118

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Pedro Alonso Gonzales, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants

were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under 28

U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.

2000); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order), and we

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Gonzales’ action because Gonzales

failed to show in his second amended complaint and its attachments that

defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. See

Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1060-61 (9th Cir. 2004) (“Deliberate

indifference is a high legal standard. A showing of medical malpractice or

negligence is insufficient to establish a constitutional deprivation under the Eighth

Amendment.”); see also Wilhem v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1122 (9th Cir. 2012)

(difference of opinion as to which medical course of action should be pursued does

not give rise to a deliberate indifference claim).

AFFIRMED.