[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24742-24743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10494]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-716]


 In the Matter of Certain Large Scale Integrated Circuit 
Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same; Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on April 1, 2010, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Panasonic Corporation, Ltd. of Japan. The complaint alleges violations 
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain large scale integrated circuit semiconductor 
chips and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain 
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,933,364 and 6,834,336. The complaint 
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as 
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2746.

    Authority:  The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010).

    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on April 28, 2010, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain large scale 
integrated circuit semiconductor chips or products containing the same 
that infringe one or more of claims 1 and 4-6 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,933,364 and claims 18-21, 24-27, and 30-32 of U.S. Patent 6,834,336, 
and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Panasonic Corporation, Ltd., 1006 Kadoma, 
Kadoma City, Osaka 571-8501, Japan.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 6501 William Cannon Drive West, Austin, 
Texas 78735.
Freescale Semiconductor Japan Ltd., ARCO Tower 15F, 1-8-1, Shimo-
Meguro, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0064, Japan.
Freescale Semiconductor, Xiqing Integrated Semiconductor, Manufacturing 
Site, No. 15 Xinghua Road, Xiqing Economic Development Area, Tianjin, 
China 300381.
Freescale Semiconductor, Innovation Center, Zhangjiang Building 20F 
Unit A, No. 560 Songtao Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 210203, 
China.
Freescale Semiconductor Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., NO. 2 Jalan SS 8/2, Free 
Industrial Zone, Sungai Way, 47300 Petaling Jaya, Selengor, Malaysia.
Freescale Semiconductor Pte. Ltd., 7 Changi South Street 2, 
<greek-i>03-00, Singapore 486415.
Freescale Semiconductor Taiwan Ltd., 6F, Unit 6, 66, San-Chong Road, 
Taipei City 11560, Taiwan.
Mouser Electronics, Inc., 1000 North Main Street, Mansfield, Texas 
76063.
Premier Farnell Corporation d/b/a Newark, 7061 East Pleasant Valley, 
Independence, Ohio 44131.
Motorola Inc., 1303 East Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196.
    (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this 
investigation, is Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be

[[Page 24743]]

submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: April 29, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-10494 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P