alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
         Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, John Ray Rask, certify that:

     (1)  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Office
Managers, Inc., (the "Company");

     (2)  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

     (3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

     (4)  The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

          (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
     that material information relating to the Company is made known to us
     by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
     which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
     controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     (5)  The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the
audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons fulfilling
the equivalent function):

          (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability
     to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
     identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in
     internal controls; and

          (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
     or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
     internal controls; and

     (6)  The Company's other certifying officer and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2003              By: /S/ John Ray Rask
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   John Ray Rask,
                                   Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134340 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices v SC: 134340 

 COA: 272593 

Kent CC: 03-001560-FH 

03-001561-FH 

NIGEL KEITH EARVIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

s0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 164 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 164

            To improve mathematics and science instruction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To improve mathematics and science instruction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANTS TO IMPROVE MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE INSTRUCTION.

    (a) Grants Authorized.--The Secretary of Education is authorized to 
award a grant to the Governor or State educational agency of a State if 
the Secretary determines that the average score of 8th grade students 
in the State on the 1999 retake of the Third International Mathematics 
and Science Study (TIMSS) is or would be lower than the median of the 
scores of the countries participating in the 1999 retake of the Third 
International Mathematics and Science Study.
    (b) Amount.--The Secretary of Education shall award a grant under 
this section in an amount not less than $500,000 and not more than 
$1,000,000.
    (c) Comparison.--The Secretary of Education shall use the results 
of the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress for 
comparisons between States and countries with respect to the 1999 
retake of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study.
    (d) Competitive Basis.--The Secretary shall award grants under this 
section on a competitive basis.
    (e) Uses.--Each Governor or State educational agency receiving a 
grant under this section shall use the grant funds to improve 
mathematics and science instruction in the State.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section 
for each of the fiscal years 2000 through 2003.

SEC. 2. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Math and Science Learning 
Improvement Act of 1999''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bryan M. Lemley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|               |  |  |  |                                                                  
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|March 23, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Bryan M. Lemley                                              
|Date           |  |  |  | Bryan M. Lemley, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|               |  |  |  | (principal financial and accounting officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

RICHARD SCOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

BAYZLE MORGAN, 

Real Party in Interest. 

No. 70945 

FILED 

AUG 0 8 2016 

TRACIE K LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTY CLERK 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a 

district court order granting real party in interest's request to instruct the 

jury regarding lesser-related offenses. Having considered the documents 

on file herein, we conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that 

our extraordinary intervention is warranted, NRS 

)(9 -244S-17 
J. 

34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 

844 (2004), and we therefore 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

Cherry 

J. 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

The Law Office of Daniel M. Bunin 

Dayvid J. Figler 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'We deny as moot the request for stay and lift the temporary stay 

entered in this matter on August 4, 2016. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 2
EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                       SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Technology Research Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert S. Wiggins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





     August 14, 2002           /s/ Robert S. Wiggins
___________________________   __________________________________
          Date                Robert S. Wiggins
                              Chairman of the Board and
                              Chief Executive Officer


























                                   - 10 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF HOOPER HOLMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE
30, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       6,376,820
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,168,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                   884,169
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,575,508
<PP&E>                                      19,491,592
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,915,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,717,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,545,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          275,664
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,872,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,148,210
<SALES>                                     82,112,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            82,112,603
<CGS>                                       59,379,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               59,379,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,754,138
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               240,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,023,213
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,384,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,639,213
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,639,213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26<F1>
<FN>
<F1>ADJUSTED TO REFLECT A TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 22, 1997, AND
THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS
PER SHARE", WHICH BECAME EFFECTIVE IN 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 40-9083; NRC-2009-0352]

Notice is hereby given that by petition dated March 4, 2010, Isaac D. Harp (petitioner) has requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take enforcement action against the U.S. Army for the unlicensed possession and use of depleted uranium.

As the basis for this request, the petitioner states that the Army's license, SUB-459, expired on October 31, 1964, and if any depleted uranium was possessed or released to the environment after the expiration date, that was an unlawful act and subject to NRC enforcement policies.

The request is being treated pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission's regulations. The request has been referred to the Director of the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs (FSME). As provided by Section 2.206, the petitioner met with the FSME petition review board on April 14, 2010, to discuss the petition. The results of that discussion were considered in the board's determination regarding the petitioner's request and in establishing the schedule for the review of the petition.

                    A copy of the request is available in ADAMS (ML100640665) for inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and from the ADAMS Public Library component on the NRC's Web site,                     *http://www.nrc.gov*                     (the Public Electronic Reading Room).                

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 26th day of April, 2010.

For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Keith I. McConnell,

Deputy Director, Decommissioning and Uranium Recovery Licensing Directorate, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection Program, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs.

[FR Doc. 2010-10555 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Michael T. Kennedy, certify that:



1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) of Radnor Holdings Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this
report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fiscal quarter ended December 27, 2002 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  | 
|---------------------- |  | 
|Date: October 16, 2003 |  | 
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |
(No. 5627.

April 6, 1931.)

#### ELVA GARVIN, Administratrix of the Estate of OLIVER K. EXUM, Deceased, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF POCATELLO, a Corporation, and H. W. HENDERSON, Sheriff of Bannock County, Idaho, Respondents.

[298 Pac. 359.]

F. E. Tydeman, for Appellant.

Merrill & Merrill, for Respondents.

GIVENS, J.

This action was heretofore before this court. *(Civils v. First National Bank of Pocatello,*41 Ida. 690, 241 Pac. 1023.) Since the former appeal, appellant’s name has been changed to Mrs. Garvin.

The facts sufficiently appear in the former opinion, which held .the only grounds available to appellant in her attack upon the mortgage in question were payment and respondents’ alleged unlawful coercion exerted against O. K.. Exum.

The trial court in the second action, found against appellant on both these points, and there is no evidence in the present record which would justify any other finding.

*492The court found that Mrs. A. Exum had adopted the disputed signature to the mortgage, claimed by appellant to be a forgery, which finding as a legal proposition is justified. *(Clegg v. Eustace,*40 Ida. 651, 237 Pac. 428; *State v. Burtenshaw,*25 Ida. 607, 138 Pac. 1105; *First Nat. Bank v. Glenn,*10 Ida. 224, 109 Am. St. 204, 77 Pac. 623.) But appellant urges adoption of the signature was not alleged, and it was not; since, however, the judgment may be affirmed on the first findings above referred to, it is unnecessary to consider the availability to appellant of the doctrine of adoption, not pleaded.

The court found appellant, as the representative of O. K. Exum, estopped by his acts to assert or rely upon the forgery, if there was one, since he participated therein. This finding is in accord with the previous opinion herein, which upon its rendition became the law of the case, and henceforth binding herein. *(Lindsay v. People,*1 Ida. 438; *Palmer v. Utah & Northern Ry. Co.,*2 Ida. 382, 16 Pac. 553; *Hall v. Blackman,*9 Ida. 555, 75 Pac. 608; *Steve v. Bonners Ferry Lumber Co.,*13 Ida. 384, 92 Pac. 363; *Gerber v. Nampa & Meridian Irr. Dist.,*19 Ida. 765, 116 Pac. 104; *City of Nampa v. Nampa & Meridian Irr. Dist.,*23 Ida. 422, 131 Pac. 8; *Brinton v. Johnson,*41 Ida. 583, 240 Pac. 859; *Mathers v. Mathers,*42 Ida. 821, 248 Pac. 468; *Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co.,*47 Ida. 272, 274 Pac. 1069; *Crockett v. Jones, 47*Ida. 497, 277 Pac. 550.)

If the question of service in the mortgage foreclosure may now or herein be questioned, the evidence conclusively showed service upon Mrs. A. Exum.

No rights of creditors, protection for which is sought through the administratrix, are herein involved.

Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondents.

Lee, C. J., and Yarian and McNaughton, JJ., concur.

Petition for rehearing denied.