alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1




                          BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION

             FORM 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2000



                                                                EXHIBIT NO. 10.1



                   AMENDMENT TO BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION
                    KEY EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN




         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Briggs & Stratton
Corporation Key Employee Savings and Investment Plan to make certain changes to
the Plan;

         NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan be amended as follows:

         1.  Section 1.4 is amended to read as follows:


             "1.4   'Committee' means the Compensation Committee of the Board."

         2.  The first sentence in Section 3.1(a) is revised to read as follows
             effective as of January 1, 2001:

                    "(a) A Participant in the Plan may (on a form provided by
             the Employer) elect to defer a whole percentage amount (not
             exceeding 16%) of the Participant's Regular Compensation earned
             during periods subsequent to such election."

         3.  The first sentence in Section 3.2(a) is revised to read as follows
             effective as of January 1, 2001:

                    "(a) A Participant may elect to defer a whole percentage
             amount (not exceeding 16%) of the Participant's Total Bonus Payout
             paid during any Plan Year beginning after June 30, 2000."

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of this Corporation be
and they hereby are authorized and directed to take any and all such further
actions as they deem necessary or desirable in order to implement the foregoing
resolutions, including the incorporation of the amendment into a restated Plan
document.
Exhibit 15.2  KPMG   LLP

Telephone

(416)   228-7000Chartered   Accountants

Fax

(416)   228-7123Yonge   Corporate Centre

Internet

www.kpmg.ca4100   Yonge St.Suite 200North York, ON M2P 2H3  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors Celestica Inc.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113591, 333-88210, 333-71126, 333-66726, 333-63112) and Form F-3 (No. 333-178161) of Celestica Inc. of our report dated March 6, 2014, on the consolidated financial statements of Celestica Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, and our audit report dated March 6, 2014 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the annual report on Form 20-F of Celestica Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.  Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption by the Company of a new accounting pronouncement related to employee benefits in 2013.    Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants March 14, 2014 Toronto, Canada  KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 606 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 592
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 606

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           September 28, 2018

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1025 Nevin Avenue in Richmond, California, as the ``Harold D. 
                  McCraw, Sr., Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAROLD D. MCCRAW, SR., POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1025 Nevin Avenue in Richmond, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Harold D. McCraw, Sr., Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Harold D. 
McCraw, Sr., Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 592

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 606

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1025 Nevin Avenue in Richmond, California, as the ``Harold D. 
                  McCraw, Sr., Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 32.2

|                              | (1)                          | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |
|                              | (2)                          | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                              |
|                              |
| Date:  February 5, 2010 | By: /s/ Thomas G. Archbold   |
|                              | Thomas G. Archbold           |
|                              | Chief Financial Officer |
|                              |
|                              |
|                              |
|                              |

----
Appellant argues that a translation inaccuracy caused counsel

to ask the landlord if appellant had paid rent at the landlord's office instead of at the apartment, thereby denying him the opportunity to demonstrate that he had paid rent to the landlord. Even if an inaccuracy occurred, 1 appellant fails to demonstrate that the substance of his statements was fundamentally altered as counsel asked the landlord if appellant came to see him in order to pay rent and the landlord testified that the only one who paid any money for the rent was the victim

Having considered appellant's claim and concluded that relief is not warranted, we

ORDER the amended judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Hardesty Parraguirre Cherry

1 We note that appellant has not demonstrated a translation inaccuracy as outlined in Ouanbengboune as he failed to submit a translation of his statements to counsel establishing the interpreter's error but merely asserts that there was a misinterpretation.

2cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Kay Ellen Armstrong Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 3
SEC00229
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wi-Max Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Berman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Date: May 23, 2011
 
 
 By: /s/ Steven Berman
 Steven Berman
 Chief Executive Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

QouLI)O.MANN 

--mm. 

, i%: 

Boara oi Insurance Comrlssionors 

wfo Diviszion 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Mr. Barrow8 ' 

July 1, 1940, uh.bh 

ity to pay futwe Expense aa- 

. Heath in view of a reoerrt 

In or&w to ot. least take care 

amOunts from: this dote, till 

lse us, with a copy for the Coqtroller, if in your o@iofi the trip is legal 

am% in tho interest of tho State of Texas so 

that the vizrrzmts IiiLy be honorti. 

~Th3.s trip wa9 m&3, aa ycm tierstand, 

In acoorclmoe with the prjvislons of jrtlcle 

460&a, Section 3# as Zzetied by the Fortysixth Lc,$slatUre,* 
. . .- 

480 

Board of ;Insurance Comudssion%rs - Page 2 

W3 sr% ;rdvisad by you that this joint cxamination is still in proocss and kir. Reath is still engaged 

therein. 

Articl3 4690, Vernon's Revised Civil Statutes, 

specifically authorizes the ohairnan of the Board of Insurance COmissloners, either in Ferson or by one or 

mre Commission %xamlpors, to visit ad oxadno, either 

alono or jointly vith representatives of the Insurance 

Supervising Departments of other states, oaoh insurance 

company not organized under the laws of this State but 

authoriied to trimsaot business 111 this State. You am 

therefore dvisod that, in the opinion of this dspartmnt, the trip concerning which you mUi inquiry is for 

State business $urpoees rlirwtly concornin~ the Dayartmnt of Insurance, by which Lir. Reath is enploged. 

In our Opinion No, o-2467, adclrossed to the 

Bonorablo Gee. If. Sheppard, CoLTtroller of Fublia Ac00Llnte, this dapartmnf ruled that th3 traveling-expense 

ridor appended to Senate Dill 427, Acts of the 46th Lcgislatum , ixohibited the paymnt of traveling exp%nscs incurrccl on out-of-State trips , unless the written statomnt of the Attorney General that the purpose of tha pro- 

;omd trip is for State business purpose shall hav% been 

obtained and filed in ailvance of the trip vith th3 State 

Conptroller. A copy of such opinion is enclosocl horctith. 

It will be observed that in that Instanoo the employee 

had completed the trip without procuring an opinion from 

the Attorney Goneral advising that the prposo of the 

prosos%d trip mm for th3 discharge OS State business. 

Tbo prpose of the rider is to require approval of the 

trip as being for Stat3 business prpOscs prior to the 

incurring of the ex;londitur% for which roimburscmont is 

sought fron; the State. l'hwcfor3, so mch of Zr. 

kioath's traveling sxpcnses in connection with this 

out-of-Stat% trip as vor% incurred prior to the procurin and filing of this oFin.ion with the Stat3 Conptroller rray not be *cl by tbo CoE@roll%r; but such 

3xpcnses as are incurred after the filing of this opinion with the Comptroller my be roin&urs%d, if othorwiso 

in order. 

Trusting that the above fully ansuors your in- 
481 

Board OS InaarWe t?omdeeionera - Page 8 

Very truly yours 

ATTORIEX QBWRAL OP T3XAS 

RVP-MR 

Rn010sure
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                      STERLING BANCSHARES CAPITAL TRUST II

          This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of February 13, 2001
for the purposes of organizing a business trust pursuant to the Delaware
Business Trust Act, 12 Del. C. (S)(S) 3801 et seq. (the "Act").

          The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

          1.  Name.  The name of the business trust is "Sterling Bancshares
Capital Trust II" (the "Trust").

          2.  Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the Delaware
resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the
Act are as follows:

          Bankers Trust (Delaware)
          1011 Centre Road
          Suite 200
          Wilmington, Delaware 19805

          3.  Effective.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
immediately upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the
Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and year first
above written.

                                    BANKERS TRUST (DELAWARE),
                                    as Delaware Trustee


                                    By:  /s/ Elizabeth B. Ferry
                                         -----------------------------
                                    Name:  Elizabeth B. Ferry
                                    Title:  Assistant Vice President
<PAGE>

                                    ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


                                    By:  /s/ George Martinez
                                         --------------------------
                                    Name:  George Martinez


                                    ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


                                    By:  /s/ Downey Bridgwater
                                         --------------------------
                                    Name:  Downey Bridgwater



                                    ADMINISTRATIVE TRUSTEE


                                    By:  /s/ Michael A. Roy
                                         --------------------------
                                    Name:  Michael A. Roy

                                       2
<PAGE>


                              Sonic Foundry, Inc.
                           Annual Report on Form 10-K
                     For the Year Ended September 30, 2002


EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 filed on March 26, 1999, amended on September 8, 2000) pertaining to
the Sonic Foundry, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the Sonic Foundry, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and the Shareholder Relations
Consultant Warrants, (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 filed on November
12, 1999) pertaining to shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
debentures and exercise of certain warrants, (iii) the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 filed on October 25, 1999) pertaining to shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of certain warrants, (iv) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 filed on June 30, 2000) pertaining to the Sonic Foundry, Inc. Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, (v) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 filed on September
8, 2000) pertaining to the 1999 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, (vi) the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 filed on November 7, 2000, amended on February
16, 2001) pertaining to shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
exchangeable shares and the exercise of exchangeable share options and warrants
(vii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 filed on May 15, 2000) pertaining to
shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants, (viii) the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 filed on November 21, 2001) pertaining to the
Sonic Foundry, Inc. 2001 Deferred compensation Plan, (ix) the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 filed on December 21, 2001) pertaining to the MediaSite,
Inc. Employee Retention Plan, (x) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 amended
on December 21, 2001) pertaining to the amended 1999 Non-Qualified Stock Option
Plan, (xi) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 effective July 17, 2002)
pertaining to shares issued and issuable pursuant to the conversion of debt and
exercise of warrants, (xii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 effective
August 16, 2002) pertaining to shares issued and issuable pursuant to the
exercise of warrants and (xiii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 effective
September 13, 2002) pertaining to shares issued and issuable pursuant to the
exercise of warrants of our report dated November 9, 2002, except Note 4 and
Note 16 as to which the date is December 17, 2002, with respect to the financial
statements and schedule of Sonic Foundry, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K/A) for the year ended September 30, 2002.

                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
January 23, 2003

                                       67
**Exhibit32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of Valley National Gases Incorporated (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,James P. Hart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 01, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 01, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24A1301. MAYDELIN MARTELL AGENCY, LLC v. ORION RESTORATION - STORM DIVISION, LLC .
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
EXHIBIT 10(a)(iv)



                           BILL OF SALE AND ASSIGNMENT

         This instrument dated as of February 1, 2001 is made by LaSalle Bank
National Association, a national banking association ("Bank"), in favor of
Independent Steel Products, LLC, a New York limited liability company
("Purchaser").

         WHEREAS, Purchaser and Bank are parties to a Foreclosure Agreement
dated the date hereof ("Agreement"), pursuant to which Bank agreed to sell,
transfer and assign to Purchaser the "Subject Assets" (as such term is defined
in the Agreement) and

         WEHREAS, Purchaser and Bank desire to evidence the transfer of the
Subject Assets by Seller to Purchaser.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for the consideration set forth in the Agreement, the
receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Bank hereby transfers,
conveys and assigns, forever, to the Purchaser, its successors and assigns, to
the extent agreed to be sold by Bank and purchased by Purchaser under the
agreement, all right, title and interest in and to the Subject Assets.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bank has executed this Bill of Sale on the date
first above written.

                           LA SALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                           By: /s/ John Mostofi______________________
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10533 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
STEPHANIE ANN HATLEY , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 119

- 3

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Stephanie Ann Hatley pleaded guilty of conspiring to traffic methamphetamine. She now appeals, challenging her 20

- year sentence. The Guidelines findings the district court made

— a total offense level of 42 and criminal history category of II

— normally result in a recommended sentencing range of 30 years to life . But because the drug statute she was convicted under ha s a statutory maximum of 20 years, 21 U.S.C. § § 846,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 8, 2019 Lyle W. Ca yce Clerk Case: 18-10533 Document: 00514865067 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2019No. 18

- 10533

2 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(C), the Guidelines range was capped

. U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(a). After overruling Hatley’s objections to the Gui delines and sentencing her to the statutory maximum of 20 years, the district court stated that was “the sentence I would impose, regardless of what the Guideline range might have been for sentencing, because I think that’s a sentence that is required to

a ddress” the statutory sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553. It reached that conclusion because the amount of meth involved in Hatley’s offense would have subjected her to a 40

- year statutory max imum, but the government allowed her to plead to a lesser o ffense with the 20

- year cap. The district court further observed that even if it had awarded Hatley a reduction for acceptance of responsibility (it did not based on its finding that she raised frivolous objections at sentencing ), the Guideline range would still have exceed ed the statutory maximum sentence it imposed. These explanations for why the court imposed the 20

- year sentence doom Hatley’s appeal o f three Guidelines rulings. The district court made clear that a different outcome on the Guideli nes ’ rulings Hatley challenges

— involving enhancements for a firearm and importing the drugs from Mexico , and rejection of acceptance of responsibility

— would not have changed her sentence. And its r easoning ma kes sense given that ruling in Hatley’s favor

o n these issues would not have reduced the Guidelines range below the sentence the court imposed. Any Guidelines error was harmless

. See, e.g. , United States v. Halverson , 897 F.3d 645, 652 (5th Cir. 2018); United States v. Castro

- Alfonso , 841 F.3d 292, 2 98 (5th Cir. 2016) ; United States v. Ibarra

Luna , 628 F.3d 712, 718 (5th Cir. 2010). AFFIRMED. Case: 18-10533 Document: 00514865067 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2019