alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_________________________

No. 06

- 12

- 00030

- CV

______________________________

THE FANNIN COUNTY COMMUNITY

SUPERVISION AND CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT , Appellant

V.

GLENDA SPOON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 10

- 39887

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Glenda Spoon, appellee, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction,

stating that the trial court dissolved the order from which this is brought. We ha ve received and

considered Fannin County Community Supervision and Corrections Department’s response.

Due to the fact that the trial court has dissolved the order from which an appeal was

taken

, 1 there remains no appealable order. Thus, this Court has no jurisdiction over the appeal.

We grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: June 12, 2012

Date Decided: June 13, 2012

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 29.5.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, James M. McNamee, the Chief Executive Officer, and Fred Lash, the Chief Financial Officer, of Hooper Holmes,  Inc. (the
Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each hereby certifies that:

| | (i)     this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                   

|Dated:  May 15, 2003 |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |                                                             
|                     |  | /s/ JAMES M. MCNAMEE                                        
|                     |  |                                                             
|                     |  | James M. McNamee                                            
|                     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer             
|                     |  |                                                             
|                     |  | /s/ FREDLASH                                                
|                     |  |                                                             
|                     |  | Fred Lash                                                   
|                     |  | Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1853

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel FRITHA.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

FRITHA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and sections 12106, 12108, and 12109 of title 46,

8 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation shall
2

•S 1853 IS

1 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en2 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

3 vessel FRITHA, United States official number 1085943.

Æ
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 10.27A

[**]


[**] CERTAIN INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH
RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.

                                       1


<PAGE>



[**]


[**] CERTAIN INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH
RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.

                                       2


<PAGE>



[**]


[**] CERTAIN INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH
RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.

                                       3


<PAGE>



[**]


[**] CERTAIN INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH
RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.

                                       4


<PAGE>



[**]


[**] CERTAIN INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH
RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.

                                       5
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00287-CV

J. D. Gulley, Appellant

v.

Philip Sueoka, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 51,769, HONORABLE GERALD M. BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from the county court at law’s judgment declaring that the breachof-contract claim brought by J.D. Gulley was barred by res judicata. However, because it is clear

from the record that Gulley’s suit originated in small claims court, we have no jurisdiction to hear

Gulley’s appeal and must therefore dismiss for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code

Ann. § 28.053(d) (West 2004); Tex. R. App. P. 60.2(a).

DISCUSSION

Gulley represents in his appellate brief that his initial suit was heard in justice court

and appealed to the county court at law. However, the clerk’s record establishes that Gulley’s

original petition was filed, and judgment was entered, in Small Claims Court of Precinct 1,

Bell County, Texas, which had jurisdiction over the suit. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 28.003

(West Supp. 2007). The judgment is captioned “IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT” and bears the
2

seal of the small claims court, see id. § 28.006 (West 2004), and Gulley’s petition substantially

complies with the form for actions in small claims court. Id. § 28.012.

Under the government code, a dissatisfied party may appeal the judgment of the small

claims court to the county court or county court at law, id. § 28.052(a) (West Supp. 2007), but the

judgment on appeal is “final.” Id. § 28.053(d) (West 2004). The Texas Supreme Court has

interpreted this provision to mean that the judgment of a county court or county court at law is “final

and not appealable.” Sultan v. Mathew, 178 S.W.3d 747, 751 (Tex. 2005) (emphasis added). Thus,

“under section 28.053(d) of the Texas Government Code, the courts of appeals lack jurisdiction over

cases originally filed in the small claims court.” Id. at 752; see also Lister v. Walters,

No. 06-07-00137-CV, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 1351, at *4-5 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Feb. 22, 2008,

no pet. h.) (holding that court lacked jurisdiction to consider appeal, noting that although several

documents in record were captioned “In Justice Court” and several contained seal of justice court,

plaintiff’s petition was captioned “In Small Claims Court” and petition complied with form for

actions in small claims court).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Diane Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: May 9, 2008
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 196

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive in the case of

multiemployer plans the section 415 limit on benefits to the participant’s

average compensation for his high 3 years.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive

in the case of multiemployer plans the section 415 limit

on benefits to the participant’s average compensation

for his high 3 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS

4 UNDER SECTION 415 LIMIT ON BENEFITS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (11) of section 415(b)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special

7 limitation rule for governmental plans) is amended—
2

•S 196 IS

1 (1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘AND MULTI2 EMPLOYER PLANS’’ after ‘‘GOVERNMENTAL PLANS’’;

3 and

4 (2) by inserting ‘‘or a multiemployer plan (as

5 defined in section 414(f))’’ after ‘‘governmental plan

6 (as defined in section 414(d))’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to plan years beginning after De9 cember 31, 1999.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

PORTIONS OF THE EXHIBIT MARKED BY "*" HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST
FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED. THE COMPLETE EXHIBIT, INCLUDING THE PORTIONS FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED, HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                               2001 INCENTIVE PLAN




For the 2001 fiscal year, a corporate executive will be awarded 100% of his or
her target bonus amount (target amounts established at the Feb. 8th Compensation
Committee) if the Company's ****** reaches its established budget for the year
(************). An employee's actual bonus may vary above and below his or her
target according to the schedule below:

         *******                               Bonus Amount

Below **************                No bonus amount

*********** to ***********          50% - 100% of target on a pro rata basis

*********** to ***********          100% - 150% of target on a pro rata basis

*********** to ***********          150% - 175% of target on a pro rata basis


Adjustments to the ******* targets shown above will be made for acquisitions
made during the year in amounts agreed upon by the Compensation Committee and
Executive Management of the Company. Adjustments to the ******* targets shown
above will be made for capital expenditures that exceed the capital expenditure
budget for fiscal 2001 in amounts agreed upon by the Compensation Committee and
Executive Management. Actual ******* for the year used for incentive plan
calculations will exclude ***************** such as ************************.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wi-Max Communications,  Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, George E. Harris,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 18, 2008



By:      /s/ George E. Harris
         ----------------------------------
         George E. Harris
         Chief Executive Officer, principal financial officer
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sky Brasil Servicos Ltda (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Ricardo Miranda Silva, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: /s/ Ricardo Miranda Silva

Ricardo Miranda Silva

Chief Executive Officer

June 30, 2003
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Waymon S. Harbin, Jr., Respondent, 

v. 

State of South Carolina, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2009-139675 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

Appeal From Anderson County 

J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-036 

Submitted September 20, 2012 – Filed September 26, 2012 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior 

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, 

Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, 

Assistant Attorney General Kaelon Elizabeth May, all of 

Columbia, for Petitioner State of South Carolina. 

Bruce A. Byrholdt, of Chapman Byrholdt & Yon, of 

Anderson, for Respondent. 
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the Appendix and briefs, the 

writ of certiorari is 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, 

JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1839 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1839

To provide that land which is owned by the Lower Sioux Indian Community 
in the State of Minnesota but which is not held in trust by the United 
States for the Community may be leased or transferred by the Community 
             without further approval by the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 1999

 Mr. Wellstone introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that land which is owned by the Lower Sioux Indian Community 
in the State of Minnesota but which is not held in trust by the United 
States for the Community may be leased or transferred by the Community 
             without further approval by the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
without further approval, ratification, or authorization by the United 
States, the Lower Sioux Indian Community in the State of Minnesota 
(referred to in this section as the ``Community''), may lease, sell, 
convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of the 
Community's interest in any real property that is not held--
            (1) within the borders of the Lower Sioux Reservation; or
            (2) in trust by the United States for the benefit of the 
        Community.
    (b) Trust Land Not Affected.--Nothing in this section is intended 
or shall be construed to--
            (1) authorize the Community to lease, sell, convey, 
        warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of an interest 
        in any real property that is held in trust by the United States 
        for the benefit of the Community; or
            (2) affect the operation of any law governing leasing, 
        selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring any 
        interest in such trust land.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of First McMinnville
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Kenny D. Neal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ Kenny D. Neal
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Kenny D. Neal
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             November 12, 2002
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 09, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 09, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0079. GORMAN JENKINS v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

18CV325 94CR85
EXHIBIT 23.3



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-65245, No. 333-65255, No. 333-31054, No. 333-37456, No.
333-43510, No. 333-62940, No. 333-62942, No. 333-62946, No. 333-62948, No. 333-86810, No. 333-98547 and No. 333-103882 of Entrust, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated February 27, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Entrust,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|Dallas, Texas            
|March 14, 2005
| **Basis Of Presentation (Details)**                                                 | 9 Months Ended |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]** |           |
| Number of principal product categories                                              | 5              |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of Principal Product Categories
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**stj_NumberofPrincipalProductCategories**Namespace Prefix:**stj_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_OrganizationConsolidationAndPresentationOfFinancialStatementsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1906

To amend Public Law 104–307 to extend the expiration date of the authority

to sell certain aircraft for use in wildfire suppression, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10, 1999

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. ALLARD, and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on

Armed Services

A BILL

To amend Public Law 104–307 to extend the expiration

date of the authority to sell certain aircraft for use

in wildfire suppression, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

4 Section 2 of the Wildfire Suppression Aircraft Trans5 fer Act of 1996 (Public Law No. 104–307) is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ‘‘September

7 30, 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2005’’;

8 (2) in subsection (d)(2)(C), by striking ‘‘and’’

9 at the end;
2

S 1906 IS

1 (3) in subsection (d)(2)(D), by striking the pe2 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’;

3 (4) in subsection (d)(2), by adding at the end

4 the following:

5 ‘‘(E) be in effect until September 30,

6 2005’’; and

7 (5) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘March 31,

8 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2005’’.

Æ