alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                            LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                Country, State
                                                                or Province
                                                                of Incorporation
                                                                ----------------

Metallurg International Resources, LLC                          Delaware
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corporation                           Delaware
Metallurg Services, Inc.                                        New York
MIR (China), Inc. (dormant)                                     Delaware
Metallurg (Canada) Limited                                      Quebec, Canada
Metallurg Holdings Corporation                                  New York
    Elektrowerk Weisweiller GmbH                                Germany
    Metallurg Europe Limited                                    England
        London & Scandinavian Metallurgical Co Limited          England
            S. A. Vickers Limited (dormant)                     England
            H. M. I. Limited (dormant)                          England
            Metal Alloys (South Wales) Limited (dormant)        England
            Metalloys Limited (dormant)                         England
            The Aluminium Powder Company Limited                England
                Alpoco Developments Limited (dormant)           England
                Benda-Lutz-Alpoco Sp.zo.o.                      Poland
            M & A Powders Limited (dormant)                     England
            Hydelko AS                                          Norway
        Metallurg South Africa (Pty.) Limited                   South Africa
            W.T. Mines Limited (dormant)                        South Africa
            Stand 359 Wadeville Extension 4 (Pty.) Limited      South Africa
            Reframet Installations (Pty.) Limited               South Africa
            Natal Foundry Suppliers (Pty.) Limited              South Africa
        Companhia Industrial Fluminense                         Brazil
    Turk Maadin Sirketi                                         Turkey
        Oren Madencilik (dormant)                               Turkey
    Metallurg (Far East) Limited                                Japan
    Metallurg Mexico S. A. de C. V.                             Mexico
    Metallurg Servicios S de RL de CV                           Mexico
    Caribbean Metals & Alloys Limited (dormant)                 Jersey, CI
    Brandau y Cia S. A. (dormant)                               Spain
    Aleaciones Metalurgicas Venezolanas  C. A.  (dormant)       Venezuela

Notes

Dormant subsidiaries have no operations.

As at March 27, 2003
Exhibit
No. 32.1


Form
10-Q


HPC
Acquisitions, Inc.


File No.
0-53248








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of HPC Acquisitions, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig
S. Laughlin, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:
      November 10, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Craig S. LaughlinCraig
      S. LaughlinChief
      Executive Officerand
      Chief Financial Officer
  
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
HPC Acquisitions, Inc. and will be retained by HPC Acquisitions, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         305,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,411,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (220,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,354,000
<PP&E>                                       9,282,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,918,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,738,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,419,000
<BONDS>                                      1,395,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,862,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,738,000
<SALES>                                     35,035,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,035,000
<CGS>                                        4,876,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,347,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                90,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             451,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,210,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,592,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,802,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,802,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
(December 6, 1923.)

#### CHARLES M. PARADIS, Tax Collector of the County of Washington, State of Idaho, Respondent, v. FRANK E. SMITH, Auditor of the County of Washington, State of Idaho, Appellant.

[222 Pac. 779.]

APPEAL from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, for Washington County. Hon. B. S. Varian, Judge.

Action to enjoin county auditor from making excess charges against tax collector. Judgment for plaintiff.

*Affirmed.*

*375Fred C. Erb and George Donart, for Appellant.

Harris, Stinson & Harris, for Respondent.

Richards & Haga, J. B. Eldridge, Charles H. Darling and J. A. Gallaher, *Amici Curiae.*

E. A. Walters and R. P. Parry, *Amici Curiae.*

Counties are not entitled to urge objections which could be urged by individuals. (7 R. C. L. 926; 15 C. J. 388, 389; *City of Santa Monica v. Los Angeles County,*15 Cal. App. 710, 115 Pac. 945.)

Counties have no right under tax law which legislature cannot later change or vary. *(Erskine v. Steele Cmmty, 87*Fed. 630, 98 Fed. 215; *New York Life Ins. Co. v. Board of Commrs.,*106 Fed. 123, 45 C. C. A. 233; *Creighton v. San Francisco,*42 Cal. 446, at 450; *Williams v. Eggleston,*170 U. S. 304, 18 Sup. Ct. 617, 42 L. ed. 1047; *Hunter v. Pittsburgh,*207 U. S. 161, 28 Sup. Ct. 40, 52 L. ed. 151; *Williamson v. New Jersey,*130 U. S. 189, 9 Sup. Ct. 453, 32 L. ed. 915.)

Property held by a county, as a result of, or an incident to, its taxing power, is held by the county in its public or governmental capacity. *(State ex rel. Bell v. Cummings,*130 Tenn. 566, 176 S. W. 290, L. R. A. 1915D, 274; 15 C. J. 632; 37 Cyc. 1355, 1356.)

BUDGE, C. J.

— In this case the facts and questions of law are substantially the same as those presented to this court in the case of *Washington County v. Paradis, ante,*p. 364, 222 Pac. 775. Upon the authority of that case the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

McCarthy, Dunn, William A. Lee and Wm. E'. Lee, JJ., concur.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,525-01

EX PARTE TAYLOR PAIGE COSTELLO, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1576335-A IN THE 337TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to intoxication manslaughter and was sentenced to twelve years’

imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal her conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that her plea was involuntary because trial counsel 1

disregarded her desire to proceed to trial, and convinced her to enter an open plea by telling her that

she would receive probation when she was not actually eligible for probation. Applicant alleges that

This Court has considered Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit. 1
trial counsel failed to pursue a defense based on the complainant’s medical records and the alleged

existence of a death certificate showing the cause of death as “natural,” that it was not the wreck that

caused the complainant’s death, but rather her pre-existing medical issues. Applicant alleges that

trial counsel should have subpoenaed the medical examiner to testify for the defense in support of

this theory. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S.

52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record

should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. 

In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the

trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent her

at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 21, 2021

Do not publish
Exhibit 10.5

Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation

Directors Annual Compensation

As of December 31, 2008



|                                      |  |        |                
|------------------------------------- |  | ------ | ---------------
|Annual Retainer                       |  | Amount
|Service as Director for the Company   |  | $      | 2,000          
|Service as Director for the Bank      |  | $      | 5,000          
|                                      | 
|Meeting Fees (Non-Employee Directors) |  |       
|Committee Meetings for the Company    |  | $      | 250 per meeting
|Committee Meetings for the Bank       |  | $      | 250 per meeting
MIAD Systems Ltd.
43 Riviera drive
Unit 7
Markham,Ontario
L3R 5J6

October 1,1999

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
Mr.Michael Green
c/o MIAD Systems Ltd.
43 Riviera Dr.
Markham, Ont.

Dear Mr. Green:

MIAD is pleased to confirm, in this letter, the proposed employment terms
between you and MIAD for a one year term commencing October 1,1999.

1. Responsibilities

You will be responsible for developing ,growing and managing the activities of
the corporation as its Chief Executive and Chief Operating Officer

2. Salary and bonus

For the year commencing October 1, 1999 you will earn a salary of $180,000 per
annum. You shall be entitled to earn sales commission at the rate of $5,000 for
each $1 million dollars of sales achieved by MIAD in the fiscal year (for the
first $3 million of sales). If the corporation achieves over $3 million of
sales, you shall be entitled to an additional bonus of $20,000 per million of
sales (for revenues between $3 million and $5 million) In addition, for revenues
above $5 million, you shall be entitled to a bonus of $12,000 per Million of
sales above the $5 million.
You shall also be entitled to earn a bonus at the rate of 4%of the corporation's
pre-tax profit.
You will be reimbursed for reasonable and legitimate business expenses.



<PAGE>




3. Employment benefits

You will be entitled to employment benefits in accordance with then current MIAD
employment benefit plan.

4. Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Covenant

You shall not during a period of 3 years from October 1, 1999 and in the
Province of Ontario:

    -   engage directly or indirectly in the Business of MIAD in respect of any
        organization that was a client of MIAD during such period.

    -   Directly or indirectly solicit any such client in respect of, or perform
        or offer to perform for any such client, any of the services of the type
        offered by MIAD on your own behalf or as a member, employee or associate
        of any person or organization.

          You acknowledge that the foregoing Non-Competion and Non-Solicitation
        Covenant are reasonable and that MIAD would not have entered into this
        Employment Agreement without this Covenant which is necessary to protect
        MIAD's economic interests. The breach by you of such Covenant would
        cause serious and irreparable harm to MIAD which would not adequately be
        compensated for in damages and in the event of a breach, you consent to
        an injunction being issued restraining any further breach of such
        Covenant in addition to any other remedy that MIAD may have in the event
        of such breach.

          We look forward to working with you. To indicate your acceptance of
        these terms and conditions,kindly sign a duplicate copy of this letter
        and return to me.

        Yours very truly

        /s/ Michael Green

        MIAD Systems Ltd.
                                                      Accepted

                                                      /s/ Michael Green
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Michael Green
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50979 Conference Calendar

RONALD LEE BARLOW, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Chairman, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 98-50979

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronald Lee Barlow, Texas prisoner # 185946, appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit alleging that his inability to receive annual parole-review hearings violates his constitutional rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses. However, he does not brief any argument in connection with the dismissal of his equal protection claim, and it is thereforeNo. 98-50979 -2- waived. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993)(arguments not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a). Barlow challenges the district court’s failure to distinguish his due process claim, which he asserts is based on a property interest, from those raised by prisoners asserting a liberty interest in parole. Despite his arguments to the contrary, Barlow’s allegations show that he is really asserting a liberty interest in a parole-review hearing, and the claim therefore fails. See Johnson v. Rodriguez , 110 F.3d 299, 308 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997). Barlow is aware that such a claim will not succeed in this court, and his attempt to cast his claim in terms of a property interest is frivolous. Barlow also challenges the district court’s determination that he raised an ex post facto claim. Even if his contention that he has not raised an ex post facto claim is accepted as true, his argument does not affect the disposition of the case, i.e. it does not demonstrate that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint on summary judgment, and it is therefore of no moment. Barlow’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, it is dismissed. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000741562
<NAME> FIRST LIBERTY BANK CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,561
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,170
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,745
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    125,792
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          60,213
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            62,583
<LOANS>                                        368,161
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 610,565
<DEPOSITS>                                     497,663
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,054
<LONG-TERM>                                     50,681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 610,565
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,736
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,089
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                31,825
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,878
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,005
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,820
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      405
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  47
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,169
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,169
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.57
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,780
<LOANS-PAST>                                       612
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,562
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      537
<RECOVERIES>                                       264
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,694
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,701
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,993
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-23919 and 333-68533) and the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-65747) of our report, dated October 4, 2006 related to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of ILOG S.A., included in its Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended June 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



October 13, 2006

Paris-La Défense, France



| | Ernst & Young Audit        
| | ---------------------------
| | Represented by Denis Thibon
EXHIBIT 32.1



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dolat Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nigar Lila, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Nigar LilaNigar Lila
  Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerDate: June 19, 2009
Applied Signal Technology, Inc.
  Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  As Adopted Pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
    Report of Applied Signal Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
    the period ended August 1, 2008, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Doyle,
  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ James E. Doyle
---------------------------------------------  | Date:
          September 8, 2008
-------------------------------
|----------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|James E. Doyle
        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |