alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0409 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KATHERINE ANNE PROCTOR,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 17, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 11 2023

12/11/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0409
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories 

1090 Tusculum Avenue 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938 

Phone: 513-533-6825 

 Fax: 513-533-6826

 November 25, 2019 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00250 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. §83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, as an addition to the Special 

Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000. On October 25, 2019, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §7384q(b), the Secretary of 

HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors 

and subcontractors who worked at the Y–12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, during the 

period between January 1, 1977, and July 31, 1979, for a number of work days aggregating 

at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination 

with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees 

in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on November 24, 2019, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 

§7384l(14)(C). Therefore, beginning on November 24, 2019, members of this class of employees, 

defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

[Signature on File]

 Grady Calhoun, Director 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
18 THE STATE OF SOUTH C AROLINA In The Supreme Court

Town of Sullivan's Island, Petitioner,

v.

Michael Murray, Respondent

. Appellate Case No. 2021

- 001260

______________
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

______________ Appeal f r om Charleston County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

______________ Opinion No. 28153 Submitted April 3, 2023

– Filed April 26, 2023

______________
AFFIRMED IN RESULT

______________ John Joseph Dodds, III, of The Law Firm of Cisa & Dodds, LLP

, of Mt. Pleasant ; and George Trenholm Walker and John Phillips Linton, Jr., of Walker Gressette Freeman & Linton, LLC

, of Charleston

, all for Petitioner

. Mary Duncan Shahid, of Nexsen Pruet, LLC , and Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., of Butler Snow, LLP

, bot h of Charleston

, for Respondent.

______________19 PER CURIAM: Respondent was convicted in a municipal court bench trial of violating Sullivan's Island Town Code section s 21

- 75 and 5

- 10 (the ordinances)

. The municipal court imposed a $1040 fine as punishment. On direct appeal, the circuit court affirmed the conviction. The c ourt of a ppeals reversed, h olding the ordinances were unconstitutionally vague and failed to provide Respondent with fair notice his actions would result in a criminal violation. In addition, the court held the Town of Sullivan's Island failed to present evidence the dock built by Respondent interfered with navigation or extended into the channel in violation of the ordinance. Tow n of Sullivan's Island v. Murray , 435 S.C. 22, 864 S

. E.2d 909 (Ct. App. 2021)

. Because we agree with the court of appeals that there was no evidence Respondent violated any provision of the ordinance, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari to th e court of appeals, dispense with briefing, and affirm the result of the court of appeals ' opinion reversing Respondent's conviction.

AFFIRMED IN RESULT

.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, FEW, JAMES and HILL, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.15

                                 Schedule 2.1
                                    to the
                 Directors' Deferred Compensation and Benefits
                                Trust Agreement

             Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements Subject to Trust


  (1) Sunoco, Inc. Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan;

  (2) The entire funding for all the Indemnification Agreements with the
directors set forth below shall be Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00) in the
aggregate upon a Potential Change in Control, and an amount upon a Change in
Control calculated on the basis of the Indemnification Agreements with the
following directors:

      (a)  Raymond E. Cartledge
      (b)  Robert J. Darnall
      (c)  Mary J. Evans
      (d)  Thomas P. Gerrity
      (e)  Rosemarie B. Greco
      (f)  James G. Kaiser
      (g)  Robert D. Kennedy
      (h)  Norman S. Matthews
      (i)  R. Anderson Pew
      (j)  G. Jackson Ratcliffe
      (k)  Alexander B. Trowbridge

  (3) Benefits payable to former directors of the Company (or their
beneficiaries) in pay status as of the date of termination of the Sunoco, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors' Retirement Plan.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard P. Spencer, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Elamex, S.A. de C.V.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: March 29, 2004


                             /S/ RICHARD P. SPENCER
                     --------------------------------------
                               RICHARD P. SPENCER
                      PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



                                       48
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7969
JOHN A. HAYNES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; BENJAMIN MONTGOMERY, Warden; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-2390-3-6BC) Submitted: April 9, 1996 Decided: June 19, 1996 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John A. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Haynes v. South Carolina , No. CA-94-2390-3-6BC (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 1995). Wedeny Appellant's motion for an investigation, along with his "Informal Motion" that a subsequently filed appeal be required to be considered by a separate panel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 179

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide health care practitioners

in rural areas with training in preventive health care, including both

physical and mental care, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide health

care practitioners in rural areas with training in preventive health care, including both physical and mental care,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Preventive

5 Health Care Training Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE TRAINING.

7 Part D of title VII of the Public Health Service Act,

8 as amended by the Health Professions Education Partner-
2

•S 179 IS

1 ship Act of 1998, is amended by inserting after section

2 754 the following:

3 ‘‘SEC. 754A. PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE TRAINING.

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may make grants

5 to, and enter into contracts with, eligible applicants to en6 able such applicants to provide preventive health care

7 training, in accordance with subsection (c), to health care

8 practitioners practicing in rural areas. Such training shall,

9 to the extent practicable, include training in health care

10 to prevent both physical and mental disorders before the

11 initial occurrence of such disorders. In carrying out this

12 subsection, the Secretary shall encourage, but may not re13 quire, the use of interdisciplinary training project applica14 tions.

15 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—To be eligible to receive training

16 using assistance provided under subsection (a), a health

17 care practitioner shall be determined by the eligible appli18 cant involved to be practicing, or desiring to practice, in

19 a rural area.

20 ‘‘(c) USE OF ASSISTANCE.—Amounts received under

21 a grant made or contract entered into under this section

22 shall be used—

23 ‘‘(1) to provide student stipends to individuals

24 attending rural community colleges or other institu25 tions that service predominantly rural communities,
3

•S 179 IS

1 for the purpose of enabling the individuals to receive

2 preventive health care training;

3 ‘‘(2) to increase staff support at rural commu4 nity colleges or other institutions that service pre5 dominantly rural communities to facilitate the provi6 sion of preventive health care training;

7 ‘‘(3) to provide training in appropriate research

8 and program evaluation skills in rural communities;

9 ‘‘(4) to create and implement innovative pro10 grams and curricula with a specific prevention com11 ponent; and

12 ‘‘(5) for other purposes as the Secretary deter13 mines to be appropriate.

14 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

15 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section,

16 $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2000 through 2002.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Greenmark Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: November 10, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 84 (Monday, May 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 23226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), today 
accepted a petition, and began a review of a petition, for trade 
adjustment assistance by the Louisiana Crawfish Farmers Association on 
behalf of farm-raised crawfish producers in Louisiana. The 
Administrator will determine within 40 days whether or not increasing 
imports of crawfish contributed importantly to a greater than 15 
percent decrease in the national average price of crawfish compared to 
the average of the 3 preceding marketing years. If a determination is 
affirmative, producers who produce and market farm-raised crawfish in 
Louisiana will be eligible to apply to the Farm Service Agency for 
technical assistance at no cost and cash benefits.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trade Adjustment Assistance Staff, 
FAS, USDA, at (202) 720-0638, or by e-mail at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82f6f0e3e6e7e3e6e8f7f1f6efe7ecf6c2e4e3f1acf7f1e6e3ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfcbcddedbdadedbd5cacccbd2dad1cbffd9decc91caccdbde91d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>. Additional program information can be 
obtained at the Web site for the Trade Adjustment Assistance for 
Farmers program. The URL is http://www.fas.usda.gov/itp/taa.

    Dated: April 27, 2010.
John D. Brewer,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-10269 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Applied Signal Technology, Inc.Exhibit 32.1**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to   18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Report of Applied Signal Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary L. Yancey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ Gary L. Yancey      --------------------------------------------------------- | Date: June 1, 2006      -------------------------------- |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Gary L. Yancey,      President and      Chief Executive Officer                   |                                                     |
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1697

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to refund certain collections

received pursuant to the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (by request) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to refund certain

collections received pursuant to the Reclamation Reform

Act of 1982.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This title may be cited as the ‘‘Reclamation Reform

5 Refund Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFUND OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER

7 RECLAMATION REFORM ACT OF 1982.

8 (a) REFUND REQUIRED.—Subject to subsections (b)

9 and (c) and the availability of appropriations, the Sec10 retary of the Interior is authorized to refund fully amounts
2

S 1697 IS

1 received by the United States as payments for charges as2 sessed by the Secretary before January 1, 1994, for failure

3 to file certain certification or reporting forms prior to the

4 receipt of irrigation water, pursuant to sections 206 and

5 224(c) of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (herein6 after referred to as the ‘‘Act’’) (96 Stat. 1266, 1272; 43

7 U.S.C. 390ff, 390ww(c)). Any refund issued pursuant to

8 this subsection shall include the amount of associated in9 terest assessed by the Secretary and paid to the United

10 States pursuant to section 224(I) of the Reclamation Re11 form Act (101 Stat. 1330–268; 43 U.S.C. 390ww(I)).

12 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE FEE.—Except with respect to

13 the 1987 water year, refunds made pursuant to subsection

14 (a) shall be reduced by an administrative fee of $260 for

15 each failure to file certification or reporting forms.

16 (c) LIMITATION.—Nothing in this title shall be con17 strued as authorizing any refund of amounts paid to the

18 United States in the compromise or settlement of any

19 charge, claim, appeal, or dispute under the Act.

20 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

21 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

22 $1,000,000.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 28, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 28, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0542. TONY W. STEPHENS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV289633
Order entered April 1, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00187
- CV FIESTA MART, INC., Appellant
V. MICHAEL DASILVA, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 13
- 06510
- A 

### O RDER
We DENY Matthew R. Scott, Joe Kendall, Javier Perez, and the Kendall Law Group’s March 30, 2015 unopposed motion to withdraw as appellee’s counsel without prejudice to refiling a motion that complies with rule of appellate procedu re 6.5

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 6.5.
We GRANT appellee’s motion for extension of briefing deadline and ORDER appellee’s brief, originally due April 1, 2015, to be filed no later than June 1, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
      32.1





Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Metalline Mining Company (the “Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:
                January 31, 2007
              By
              /s/ Merlin
                BinghamMerlin
                Bingham, President
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Fred Lash,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 9, 2004



/s/ Fred LashFred LashSenior Vice President, Treasurer, andChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.