alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          26,281                  23,602
<SECURITIES>                                     2,948                   5,973
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,815                  32,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,009                  11,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,515                  80,818
<PP&E>                                         886,977                 875,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                (243,111)               (239,487)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 801,726                 789,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,359                  39,615
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                        57,946                  57,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   801,726                 789,681
<SALES>                                         59,438                 208,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,734                 218,583
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,346                 170,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,385                  48,117
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,020                  17,703
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,365                  30,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,365                  30,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.92                    3.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .0                      .0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Willis, Bumgardner and Senior Judge Overton 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

STEVIE ADAMS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 0641-99-2 JUDGE RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III 

 MAY 16, 2000 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY 

William H. Ledbetter, Jr., Judge 

 Martin W. Lester, Deputy Public Defender, for 

appellant. 

 Michael T. Judge, Assistant Attorney General 

(Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), 

for appellee. 

 

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code 

§ 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication.

The trial court revoked a previously suspended sentence 

upon the defendant's stipulation that he violated the terms of 

his probation. On appeal for the first time, the defendant 

contends the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his 

suspended sentence because the Commonwealth failed to notify his 

biological father of the original proceedings in the juvenile 

and domestic relations district court pursuant to former Code 

§§ 16.1-263 and -264. 

The defendant was charged in the juvenile and domestic 

relations district court with possession of cocaine with intent 
to distribute. The offense date was March 26, 1997. The 

juvenile and domestic relations district court found probable 

cause and transferred the case to the circuit court. Adams 

appealed the transfer decision, but the circuit court found the 

transfer appropriate and authorized the Commonwealth to seek an 

indictment. A grand jury indicted the defendant, and the 

circuit court tried the defendant with a jury, which convicted 

of the lesser-included offense of possession of cocaine. 

Moore v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 405, 410, __ S.E.2d __, __ 

(2000), held that Code § 16.1-269.1(E) cured a defect in a 

juvenile court proceeding resulting from failure to notify the 

defendant's father of the proceedings pursuant to Code 

§§ 16.1-263 and -264. Code § 16.1-269.1(E) applies to offenses 

committed after July 1, 1996. This offense occurred after that 

date, and a grand jury indicted the defendant. Accordingly, the 

indictment cured any defect that occurred, and we affirm the 

revocation. 

 Affirmed.

- 2 -
Exhibit 8.1  Subsidiaries of Registrant  Celestica Cayman Holdings 1 Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation; Celestica Cayman Holdings 9 Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation; Celestica (Gibraltar) Limited, a Gibraltar corporation; Celestica Holdings Pte Limited, a Singapore corporation; Celestica Hong Kong Limited, a Hong Kong corporation; Celestica LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Celestica Liquidity Management Hungary Limited Liability Company, a Hungary corporation; Celestica (Luxembourg) S.À.R.L., a Luxembourg corporation; Celestica (Romania) S.R.L., a Romania corporation; Celestica (Thailand) Limited, a Thailand corporation; Celestica (USA) Inc., a Delaware corporation; Celestica (US Holdings) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; IMS International Manufacturing Services Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation; 1681714 Ontario Inc., an Ontario corporation; 1755630 Ontario Inc., an Ontario corporation; and 3250297 Nova Scotia Company (formerly 1282087 Ontario Inc.), a Nova Scotia corporation.  1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.1

                      [FORM OF FACE OF CERTIFICATE]


              Organized Under the Laws of the State of South Dakota


                                                           CLASS A CAPITAL UNITS
A-

                          GREAT PLAINS ETHANOL, LLC

 THIS CERTIFIES THAT__________________________________________ IS THE OWNER AND
 REGISTERED HOLDER OF_____________________________________________ CLASS A
 CAPITAL UNITS

                          in Great Plains Ethanol, LLC

TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY THE HOLDER
HEREOF IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS
CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.

              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SAID LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAS CAUSED
              THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE SIGNED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS THIS
                     DAY OF          , 200__.


   _________________                                      _________________
       SECRETARY                                              PRESIDENT


<PAGE>





                        [FORM OF REVERSE OF CERTIFICATE]

             The sale and transfer of the Capital Units represented
             by this Certificate are restricted by, and subject to,
               the provisions of the Operating Agreement of Great
             Plains Ethanol, LLC. The Operating Agreement provides,
             among other things, that no sale, assignment, transfer,
              gift, exchange or other disposition of these Capital
              Units is valid except as specifically provided for in
                the Operating Agreement. Copies of the Operating
             Agreement and instructions for transfer, sale or other
              disposition of these Capital Units are available for
                  inspection at the Company's principal office.

             Any holder of the Class A Capital Units represented by
              this Certificate has an annual obligation to deliver
             corn to Great Plains Ethanol, LLC, under the terms of a
              Corn Delivery Agreement, a copy of which is available
                for inspection at the Company's principal office.


FOR VALUE RECEIVED __________ HEREBY SELL, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER UNTO
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________ CAPITAL UNITS REPRESENTED
BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE, AND DO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT
____________________________________________________ ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE
SAID CAPITAL UNITS ON THE BOOKS OF THE WITHIN NAMED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.
DATED         ____________________, 20_____ __________________

IN PRESENCE OF ___________________________________________________

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Omega Ventures Group, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the *"Report"*), the undersigned, John Rask, Principal Financial Officer
      of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934;
      and





(2)
      The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      result of operations of the Company.





Date:
                May 15,
                2007
            By:
            /s/ John
              RaskJohn
              RaskPrincipal
              Financial Officer
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 518



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I No. CR-15-141 JAMES MIKEL REEP APPELLANT V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered September 30, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE SALINE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 63CR-14-444-2] HONORABLE GARY ARNOLD, JUDGE SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED
RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge James Mikel Reep appeals his conviction of driving while intoxicated, fourth offense, from the Saline County Circuit Court. He argues that the circuit erred in denying his motion to suppress and in denying his motion for directed verdict. We decline to address the merits of the appeal at this time because Reep failed to comply with the Arkansas Supreme Court’s rules governing the contents of the addendum. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires that an appellant’s brief include an addendum consisting of all documents essential to this court’s resolution of the issues on appeal, including exhibits such as CDs and DVDs. In this case, the State introduced into evidence a DVD of a dashboard-camera recording of Reep being arrested and several statements he made to the arresting officer concerning his alcohol intake and his driving. The DVD was made part of the record and was essential to the circuit court’s consideration ofCite as 2015 Ark. App. 518

Reep’s directed-verdict motion. However, Reep failed to include copies of the DVD in his addendum as required by our rules. We therefore order him to file a supplemental addendum within seven calendar days of this order to provide the DVD exhibit to the members of our
court. Supplemental addendum ordered. HARRISON and B ROWN , JJ., agree. Ogles Law Firm , by: John Ogles , for appellant. Leslie Rutledge , Att’y Gen., by: Karen Virginia Wallace , Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 5, 2015

Order 

May 5, 2015

151469(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

BRANDON JASON FLAKES,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 151469

COA: 324126

Kent CC: 09-009629-FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file an 

application for leave to appeal in excess of the page limit restriction is GRANTED. The 

54-page application submitted on April 22, 2015, is accepted for filing.
(No. 5713.

June *24,*1931.)

#### In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for ERNEST THOMAS, a Minor.

[1 Pac. (2d) 1118.]

W. L. Dunn, for Petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

Original petition coming up from the Eleventh District. No reason for direct application is shown or suggested. Rule 60 of this court provides that, in addition to the. requisite matters, the applicant must set forth the reasons which render it indispensable that the writ should issue originally from this court.

Writ refused.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1875 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1875

     To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to remove the 
  prohibition on the use of funds to pay for newspaper or periodical 
                    advertising space or radio time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 1999

  Mr. Cochran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to remove the 
  prohibition on the use of funds to pay for newspaper or periodical 
                    advertising space or radio time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING 
              FUNDS TO PAY FOR NEWSPAPER OR PERIODICAL ADVERTISING 
              SPACE OR RADIO TIME.

    Section 203(f) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 
1622(f)) is amended by striking ``: Provided,'' and all that follows 
through ``203(e)''.
                                 <all>
```
|                            | (1)                     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |
|                            | (2)                     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                            |
|                            |
| Date:  March 25, 2010 | By: /s/ Owen Farren     |
|                            | Owen Farren             |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer |
|                            |
|                            |
|                            |
|                            |

----
EXHIBIT
32.2       CERTIFICATIONS







CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT
TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I,
Michael J. Shea, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Hooper Holmes, Inc.




Dated:  May 8,
200





/s/Michael J. Shea


__________________________




Michael
J. Shea




Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer




This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
(No. 5677.

January 22, 1931.)

#### J. H. STANDLEE, Appellant, v. E. H. HAWLEY and RETA G. HAWLEY, Respondents.

[295 Pac. 630.]

James R. Bothwell and W. Orr Chapman, for Appellant.

Sweeley & Sweeley, for Respondents.

Counsel file no briefs.

VARIAN, J.

Appellant brought this action to recover a deficiency arising upon summary foreclosure of a chattel mortgage (C. S., sec. 6380). A writ of attachment issued and was levied upon certain lands of respondents. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, findings and conclusions made and judgment entered in favor of respondents. The judgment adjudges that appellant take nothing by this action, that respondents recover the sum of one dollar and their costs, etc. The judgment further provided that the writ of attachment be dissolved and its levy *270on respondents’ land, describing it, quashed. The appeal is from “the whole of said judgment.” Respondents move to dismiss this appeal in so far as it relates to that portion of the judgment dissolving the attachment.

 The effect of the final judgment in favor of defendants, irrespective of any reference thereto, was to dissolve the attachment. (C. S., see. 6809; *Washington County v. Weiser Nat. Bank,*43 Ida. 618, 253 Pac. 838.) No *supersedeas*bond (C. S., sec. 7155) or undertaking as provided in C. S., see. 7159, was filed, merely a bond for costs on appeal in conformity with the provisions of C. S., sec. 7154. There is but one appeal here, i. e., from the judgment in its entirety, and we are asked, in effect, to pass upon one phase thereof in advance of the final hearing. There is no contention that respondents, by delaying until the appeal can be heard in its entirety, will be deprived of any substantial benefits. In the absence of any showing to that effect, we will not entertain an attack on a portion of the appeal, or hear the appeal itself piecemeal.

Decision on respondents’ motion to dismiss reserved until the appeal is heard.

Lee, C. J., Givens and McNaughton, JJ., and Koelsch, D. J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,716
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,650
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     35,490
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          49,307
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            50,063
<LOANS>                                        110,344
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,136
<DEPOSITS>                                     169,664
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,491
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,319
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,514
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 208,136
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,774
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,692
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   113
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,579
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,437
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,142
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   9
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,631
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,631
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        45
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,408
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,724
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       22
<RECOVERIES>                                        13
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,775
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,775
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>