alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
       OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amistar Corporation ("the Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Stuart C. Baker
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows of the Company.

                                                  By: /s/ Stuart C. Baker
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name: Stuart C. Baker
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amistar Corporation ("the Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Gregory D. Leiser
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows of the Company.


                                                  By: /s/ Gregory D. Leiser
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name: Gregory D. Leiser
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 
 18 U.S.C.
§1350,
 
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
 In
connection with this Interim Report on Form 10-Q of Technology
Research Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.Date:
      February 6, 2009
              By: /s/ Owen
      FarrenOwen
      FarrenChief
      Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Technology Research Corporation and will be retained
by Technology Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tower Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark S. Merrill, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date:    May 6, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark S. Merrill                                 
|                     |  |     |  | Mark S. Merrill                                     
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 21


                           METRIKA SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


        At February 20, 1998, Metrika Systems Corporation owned the following
    companies:

                                                                 Registrant's
                                         State or Jurisdiction       % of
    Name                                    of Incorporation      Ownership
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Eberline Radiometrie S.A.                    France              100
    Thermo Instruments Systems Ltd.                UK                100
    Eberline Radiometrie GmbH                   Germany              100
    Gamma-Metrics                              California            100
      Gamma-Metrics International F.S.C. Inc.     Guam               100
    Radiometric U.S.A., Inc.                   California            100
Slip Op. 15-99

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

DONGBU STEEL CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff,

and

UNION STEEL MANUFACTURING CO., 

LTD.,

Consolidated Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

and

NUCOR CORPORATION,

Defendant-Intervenor.

Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge

Consol. Court No. 14-00098

JUDGMENT

The U.S. Department of Commerce has filed its Final Results of Redetermination 

Pursuant to Court Remand (July 27, 2015) (“Remand Results”), ECF No. 51, pursuant to 

Dongbu Steel Co. v. United States, 39 CIT __, Slip. Op. 15-43 (May 5, 2015) (“Dongbu”),

ECF No. 48. Given that the Remand Results comply with the court’s remand order and 

that no party contests the Remand Results, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see Dongbu, Consol. 

Court No. 14-00098 (USCIT Apr. 15, 2014) (order granting consent motion for preliminary 
Court No. 14-00098 Page 2

injunction), ECF No. 10, must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, 

including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

/s/ Claire R. Kelly

Claire R. Kelly, Judge

Dated: August 31, 2015

New York, New York
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1735 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1735

          To expand the applicability of daylight saving time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 15, 1999

   Mr. Enzi introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To expand the applicability of daylight saving time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Halloween Safety Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME EXTENDED TO FIRST WEEK IN NOVEMBER.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 
U.S.C. 260a(a)) is amended by striking ``last Sunday of October'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``first Sunday of November''.
    (b) Effect on Existing State Elections.--Any law in effect on the 
date of the enactment of this Act which is--
            (1) adopted pursuant to section 3(a)(2) of the Uniform Time 
        Act of 1966 by a State with parts thereof in more than one time 
        zone, or
            (2) adopted pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of such Act by a 
        State that lies entirely within one time zone,
shall be held and considered to remain in effect as the exercise by 
that State of the exemption permitted by such Act unless that State, by 
law, provides that such exemption shall not apply.
    (c) Adjustment of Operating Hours of Daytime Broadcasters.--
Notwithstanding any other law or any regulation issued under any such 
law, the Federal Communications Commission shall, consistent with any 
existing treaty or other agreement, make such adjustment by general 
rules, or by interim action pending such general rules, with respect to 
hours of operation of daytime standard amplitude modulation broadcast 
stations, as may be consistent with the public interest in receiving 
interference-free service.
            (1) Such general rules, or interim action, may include 
        variances with respect to operating power and other technical 
        operating characteristics.
            (2) At any time subsequent to the adoption of such general 
        rules, such general rules may be varied with respect to 
        particular stations and areas because of the exigencies in each 
        case.
    (d) Effective Date.--This Act shall take effect upon enactment.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.29


October 18, 2000


Mr. Steven J. Shapiro
11730 Flintwood Drive
Houston, Texas 77024

Dear Steve,

As you know, the Board of Directors of Burlington Resources Inc. (the "Company")
will consider, at its meeting on October 18, 2000, your election to the position
of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for the Company. The
purpose of this letter is to confirm one issue that we have discussed relating
to your employment. Assuming that the Board does elect you to that position, if
(i) you are still employed by the Company on your 55th birthday or (ii) before
your 55th birthday, your employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company
(other than for "Cause" or as a result of your death or "Permanent Disability"),
you will receive upon termination of your employment with the Company a
supplemental pension benefit equal to the difference between the benfit
calculated using your actual service and the benefit calculated assuming you had
an additional three (3) years of credited service. This supplemental pension
benefit will be calculated using the provisions of the qualified Pension Plan
and the non-qualified Supplemental Benefits Plan in effect at the time of the
termination of your employment. This benefit is a non-qualified, unfounded
deferred compensation arrangement. For purposes of this letter, the terms
"Cause" and "Permanent Disability" are defined in the Company's Key Executive
Severance Protection Plan.

This letter is not a contract or offer of a contract of employment and shall not
be deemed as such. Employment at Burlington is pursuant to the
Employment-At-Will Doctrine.

Steve, I am delighted that you will be joining the Company and look forward to
working with you.

Sincerely,



Bobby S. Shackouls
**Exhibit 99.13**

 

**CONSENT OF FRED BROWN**

 

I hereby consent to the use of my name and the name of my company inconnection with the following, which are being reference in the annual reporton Form 40-F of Minera Andes Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the UnitedStates Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

1.               The technicalreport dated July 29, 2009 entitled “Technical Report on the San JoséSilver-Gold Mine, Santa Cruz, Argentina” (the “San José Report”);

 

2.               The current mineralresource and reserve estimates of the San José Silver-Gold Mine; and

 

3.               The annualinformation form of the Company dated March 30, 2010, which includesreference to my name and company name in connection with information relatingto the San José Report and the San José Silver-Gold Mine.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2010 |                             |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                      | “Signed” Fred H. Brown |
|                      | Fred H. Brown, P. Geo            |
|                      | Senior Associate Geologist       |
|                      | P&E Mining Consultants Inc.  |
Exhibit 23

                              ACCOUNTANT'S CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
333-  63361  and No.  333-69321)  on Forms  S-8 and S-3 of  Pinnacle  Bankshares
Corporation of our report dated February 12, 1999,  relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Pinnacle Bankshares  Corporation and subsidiary as of December
31,  1998 and 1997,  and the  related  consolidated  statements  of  income  and
comprehensive  income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for the
years then ended,  which report appears in the December 31, 1998,  annual report
on Form 10-KSB of Pinnacle Bankshares Corporation.



                                                              /s/ KPMG LLP
Roanoke, Virginia
March 31, 1999
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1695

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that beer or wine

which may not be sold may be transferred to a distilled spirits plant,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6, 1999

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that beer or wine which may not be sold may be transferred to a distilled spirits plant, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RECYCLING OF CONSUMER BEVERAGE PROD4 UCTS WHICH MAY NOT BE SOLD.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5222(b) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to receipt of distilling ma7 terials) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of para8 graph (2), by striking the period at the end of paragraph
2

•S 1695 IS

1 (3) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end the

2 following:

3 ‘‘(4) wine or beer with respect to which tax im4 posed by this subtitle has been paid or determined.

5 Sections 5044 and 5056 shall apply to wine and beer re6 ceived at a distilled spirits plant under paragraph (4), ex7 cept that the Secretary shall provide in the regulations

8 under such sections for credit or refund of tax paid on

9 the wine or beer to the operator of the plant if the operator

10 establishes that the operator bore the burden of the tax

11 and that no other person has claimed a credit or refund

12 of such tax.’’

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to materials received at a distilled

15 spirits plant on and after the date of the enactment of

16 this Act.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 10, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41713

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS CARRASCO-CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1163-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Carrasco-Castro appeals the 30-month sentence

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of illegally

reentering the United States after deportation, in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. Carrasco-Castro argues that his sentence should

be vacated and remanded because the district court sentenced him

under a mandatory Guideline scheme held unconstitutional in 

United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The Government

concedes that error occurred, but it notes that the error was
No. 04-41713

-2-

nonconstitutional in nature and argues that the error was

harmless.

Because Carrasco-Castro preserved his “Fanfan” challenge in

the district court by raising an objection based on Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), we review for harmless error. 

United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir. 2005). The

Government bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt

that the district court would not have sentenced Carrasco-Castro

differently under an advisory guideline sentencing regime. See

id. at 464.

The instant record fails to provide clear commentary from

the district court regarding whether it would have imposed the

same sentence in a post-Booker environment. See id. The

Government thus has not carried its burden of showing harmless

error. See id. We therefore remand Carrasco-Castro’s case for

resentencing.

Carrasco-Castro challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Carrasco-Castro contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such

arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. 

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),
No. 04-41713

-3-

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Carrasco-Castro properly

concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of

Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to

preserve it for further review. 

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Vernon H. Foersterling, Jr., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (this Report) of Integrated Security Systems, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  February 14, 2007

/s/ VERNON H. FOERSTERLING , JR.

Vernon H. Foersterling, Jr.

President and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive and Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
      undersigned, Colin Halpern, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial
      Officer and Director of Universal Services Group, Inc. (the
      "Company"),certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes
      of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the quarterly period ended February 1, 2005 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                August 15, 2007/s/
                Colin HalpernColin
                HalpernChief
                Executive Officer,
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer and Director




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 1.13

CELESTICA INC.

BY-LAW NO. 4

A
by-law providing for the amendment of By-law No. 1 of CELESTICA INC.

BE
IT ENACTED AND IT IS HEREBY ENACTED as a by-law of CELESTICA INC. (hereinafter called the "Corporation") as follows:

Paragraph
42 of By-law No. 1 of the by-laws of the Corporation be and the same is hereby amended by deleting the words "a majority" following the words "not less than" in the sixth line thereof
and by substituting therefor the words "35%", such that paragraph 42, as amended, shall read as follows:



---





QuickLinks