25794 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 89 / Monday, May 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

TABLE 2—REPETITIVE MEASUREMENT INTERVALS

If the last inrush current measurement of the serviceable AOA transducer is— Then repeat the measurement— 

More than or equal to 1.90 amps ............................................................. Within 2,000 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.80 amps but less than 1.90 amps .................... Within 1,500 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.70 amps but less than 1.80 amps .................... Within 1,000 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.60 amps but less than 1.70 amps .................... Within 500 flight hours after the last measurement. 

New Requirements of This AD 

(h) Within 6,000 flight hours after the 

effective date of this AD: Do an inspection to 

determine the serial number of the AOA 

transducer having P/N C16258AA, and to 

determine if the serial number has suffix ‘‘A,’’ 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 

670BA–27–053, Revision A, dated July 7, 

2009. 

(1) If the serial number is not specified in 

paragraph 1.A.(1) of Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, dated 

July 7, 2009, no further action is required by 

this paragraph. 

(2) If the serial number is specified in 

paragraph 1.A.(1) of Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, dated 

July 7, 2009, and the serial number has a 

suffix ‘‘A,’’ no further action is required by 

this paragraph. 

(3) If the serial number is specified in 

paragraph 1.A.(1) of Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, dated 

July 7, 2009, and the serial number does not 

have suffix ‘‘A,’’ before further flight, replace 

the AOA transducer with a serviceable 

transducer, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, 

dated July 7, 2009. 

(i) As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install, on any airplane, an AOA 

transducer having P/N C16258AA with any 

serial number specified in paragraph 1.A.(1) 

of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–27– 

053, Revision A, dated July 7, 2009, unless 

the serial number has a suffix ‘‘A.’’ 

(j) Inspections and replacements 

accomplished before the effective date of this 

AD according to Bombardier Service Bulletin 

670BA–27–051, dated May 14, 2009, are 

considered acceptable for compliance with 

the corresponding actions specified in this 

AD. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(k) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: 

Program Manager, Continuing Operational 

Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 

11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516– 

794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC 

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(l) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness 

Directive CF–2009–35, dated August 31, 

2009; Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA– 

27–051, dated May 14, 2009; and Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 670BA–27–053, Revision A, 

dated July 7, 2009; for related information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 29, 

2010. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10887 Filed 5–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0092] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Regulated Navigation Area: Red Bull 

Air Race World Championship, Upper 

New York Bay, Lower Hudson River, 

NJ and NY 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a temporary regulated 

navigation area on the navigable waters 

of the lower Hudson River and Upper 

New York Bay in the vicinity of Liberty 

State Park, New Jersey and Ellis Island, 

New Jersey and New York for the Red 

Bull Air Race World Championship, an 

event scheduled to be held over water. 

This regulation is necessary to protect 

participants and spectators from the 

hazards associated with air races. This 

proposed action is intended to restrict 

vessel traffic in a portion of the lower 

Hudson River and Upper New York Bay 

during the event. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before June 9, 2010. 

Requests for public meetings must be 

received by the Coast Guard on or before 

June 9, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2010–0092 using any one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

• Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail LTJG Eunice James, 

Coast Guard Sector New York 

Waterways Management Division, 

Marine Events Branch; telephone 718– 

354–4163, e-mail 

Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 89 / Monday, May 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 25795 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2010–0092), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2010–0092’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2; by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010– 

0092’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Basis and Purpose 

Red Bull Air Race GmbH is 

sponsoring the Red Bull Air Race World 

Championship event on and over the 

waters of the lower Hudson River and 

Upper New Bay, in the vicinity of 

Liberty State Park, NJ and Ellis Island, 

NJ and NY on June 17, 2010 through 

June 20, 2010. 

The event will feature lightweight 

racing planes, performing low-flying, 

high speed precision maneuvers while 

navigating a low-level aerial track made 

up of air-filled pylons. The objective is 

for pilots to complete the course in the 

fastest time while safely navigating 

specially designed inflatable pylons 

known as ‘‘Air Gates’’ that will be 

strategically placed in the water to form 

the race course. The event organizer will 

commence setting up the race course 

and placing the Air Gates in position, on 

June 14 through June 16, 2010. 

It is anticipated that spectator vessels 

will gather nearby to view the event. To 

provide for the safety of participants, 

support vessels, spectators and 

transiting vessels, the Coast Guard 

Captain of the Port New York will 

temporarily restrict vessel traffic during 

the event. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to establish 

a temporary regulated navigation area 

on specified waters of the Hudson River 

and Upper New York Bay. The regulated 

area will encompass all waters of Upper 

New York Bay and the Hudson River, 

bound by the following points (NAD 

83): 

40°42′31.8′′ N, 074°02′04.0′′ W; thence 

to 40°42′36.3′′ N, 074°01′47.9′′ W; thence 

to 40°42′34.1′′ N, 074°01′28.6′′ W; thence 

to 40°42′07.5′′ N, 074°01′26.4′′ W; thence 

to 40°41′17.5′′ N, 074°02′07.3′′ W; thence 

to 40°41′46.2′′ N, 074°03′04.0′′ W; and 

bound by the shoreline in the vicinity 

of Liberty State Park, NJ. The Captain of 

the Port New York will establish 

spectator vessel viewing areas within 

the boundaries of the regulated area. 

Access to the spectator vessel viewing 

areas will be restricted to vessels based 

on vessel size. 

This proposed rule is intended to 

ensure the safety of the public and 

vessels during the event and during 

scheduled activities related to the event 

associated with the Red Bull Air Race 

Championship event. 

The regulations will be in effect daily 

from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., June 17th through 

June 20th, 2010. On June 17–20, 2010, 

the restrictions will be enforced as 

needed and therefore will be 

intermittent. On June 17–18, 2010, the 

restrictions on the regulated area closure 

will total no more than 5 hours between 

the hours of 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. On June 

19–20, 2010, the regulated area closure 

will total no more than 6 hours between 

the hours of 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. The effect 

will be to restrict general navigation in 

the regulated area during the event and 

during scheduled activities related to 

the event. Except for persons or vessels 

authorized by the Coast Guard Captain 

of the Port New York or the designated 

representative, no person or vessel may 

enter or remain in the regulated area 

during the enforcement period. The 

Captain of the Port New York will notify 

the public of specific enforcement times 

by Marine Radio Safety Broadcast. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

25796 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 89 / Monday, May 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 

Although this proposed rule prevents 

vessels from transiting a portion of the 

Hudson River and Upper New York Bay 

during the event, the effect of this 

regulation will not be significant due to 

the limited duration the regulated area 

will be in effect and enforced. In 

addition, advance notifications will be 

made to the maritime community via 

information broadcasts, and local notice 

to mariners. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

This rule will affect the following 

entities: The owners and operators of 

vessels intending to transit or anchor in 

a portion of the lower Hudson River and 

Upper New York Bay in the vicinity of 

Liberty State Park, NJ between 10 a.m. 

June 17, 2010 to 6 p.m. June 20, 2010. 

This proposed regulated navigation 

area will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities for the 

following reasons: The regulated area 

would be activated for four days, and 

subject to enforcement, for 

approximately 6 hours each day when 

participating vessels and aircrafts are in 

the area. Vessel traffic can safely transit 

all waters outside the regulated area 

during the event. Before the effective 

period, we will issue maritime 

advisories widely available to users of 

the waterway. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact LTJG Eunice 

James, office: (718) 354–4163, email: 

Eunice.A.James@uscg.mil. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this proposed rule or any policy or 

action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) (2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 89 / Monday, May 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules 25797 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule 

involves the establishment of regulated 

areas, including two spectator vessel 

viewing areas for a marine event which 

a permit application was made. 

We seek any comments or information 

that may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and Record keeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226; 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 

1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 6.05; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T01–0092 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T01–0092 Regulated Navigation 

Area; Red Bull Air Race Championship, 

Upper New York Bay and Hudson River, 

New York. 

(a) Regulated Navigation Area. The 

regulated area includes all waters of 

Upper New York Bay and the lower 

Hudson River bound by the following 

points (NAD 83): 40°42′31.8′′ N, 

074°02′04.0′′ W; thence to 40°42′36.3′′ N, 

74°01′47.9′′ W; thence to 40°42′34.1′′ N, 

074°01′28.6′′ W; thence to 40°42′07.5′′ N, 

074°01′26.4′′ W; thence to 40°41′17.5′′ N, 

074°02′07.3′′ W; thence to 40°41′46.2′′ N, 

074°03′04.0′′ W; thence along the 

shoreline to the point of origin. Within 

this area, the Captain of the Port New 

York may establish— 

(b) Definition. As used in this section, 

‘‘designated representative’’ means a 

commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 

of the Coast Guard who has been 

designated by the Captain of the Port 

Sector New York. 

Regulations. (1) No person or vessel 

may enter, transit, or remain in the 

regulated area, unless participating in 

the event or unless authorized by the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port New 

York or designated representative. 

(2) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port New 

York or the designated on-scene 

representative. Upon being hailed by a 

Coast Guard or other law enforcement 

vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or 

other means the operator of a vessel 

shall proceed as directed. 

(c) Enforcement period. The regulated 

area will be enforced daily from 8 a.m. 

to 6 p.m. on June 17 through June 20, 

2010. 

Dated: May 4, 2010. 

J.A. Servidio, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting, 

Commander, First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10946 Filed 5–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0290; FRL–9142–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; 

General Provisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a request submitted by the Ohio 

Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio 

EPA) on March 17, 2009, to revise the 

Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The 

State has submitted revisions to rules 

for approval under Chapter 3745–15, 

‘‘General Provisions,’’ of the Ohio 

Administrative Code (OAC). The State’s 

revisions to OAC 3745–15–01 include 

adoption of the Federal definition and 

citation of the CAA, and the revisions to 

OAC 3745–15–05 include clarifications 

for exemptions and new requirements 

for sources regulated under Title V. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 9, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2009–0290, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: bortzer.jay@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2054. 

4. Mail: Jay Bortzer, Chief, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Jay Bortzer, Chief, 

Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer, 

Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 886–0258, 

chang.andy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Rules section of this Federal Register, 

EPA is approving the State’s SIP 

submittal as a direct final rule without 

prior proposal because EPA views this 

as a noncontroversial submittal and 

anticipates no adverse comments. A 

detailed rationale for the approval is set 

forth in the direct final rule. If no 

adverse comments are received in 

response to this rule, no further activity 

is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period; therefore, any 

parties interested in commenting on this 

action should do so at this time. Please 

note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the Rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: April 19, 2010. 

Walter W. Kovalick Jr., 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10835 Filed 5–7–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS