alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
      undersigned, Colin Halpern, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial
      Officer and Director of Universal Services Group, Inc. (the "Company"),
      certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
      for the three month period ended August 1, 1999 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                August 15, 2007/s/
                Colin HalpernColin
                Halpern
                Chief
                  Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and
                  Director




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1652 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1652

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1999

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Old Executive Office Building located at 17th Street 
 and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in Washington, District of Columbia, as 
          the Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive Office Building.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER EXECUTIVE OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    The Old Executive Office Building located at 17th Street and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in Washington, District of Columbia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive 
Office Building.

            Passed the Senate October 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                              |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   | (2) | The                information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|   |
|   |

|                             Date:  August 8,              2007 | /s/ Barry              H. Black                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                | Barry H.              Black                                                     |
|                                                                                                                                                | Vice              President              of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                                                                |
II

Calendar No. 405

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1877

To amend the Federal Report Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8, 1999

Mr. THOMPSON, from the Committee on Government Affairs, reported the

following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To amend the Federal Report Elimination and Sunset Act

of 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Reports Elimi5 nation and Sunset Act Amendments of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE OF SUNSET.

7 Section 3003(a)(1) of the Federal Report Elimi8 nation and Sunset Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–66; 109

9 Stat. 734) is amended by—
2

•S 1877 PCS

1 (1) striking ‘‘regular’’; and

2 (2) inserting ‘‘at predetermined and regular

3 time intervals,’’ after ‘‘report’’.

4 SEC. 3. EXEMPTIONS OF CERTAIN REPORTS FROM SUNSET.

5 Section 3003(d) of the Federal Reports Elimination

6 and Sunset Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–66; 109 Stat.

7 734–36) is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (31) by striking ‘‘or’’ after the

9 semicolon;

10 (2) in paragraph (32) by striking the period at

11 the end and inserting a semicolon; and

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new

13 paragraphs:

14 ‘‘(33)(A) sections 1105(a), 1106(a) and (b),

15 and 1109(a) of title 31, United States;

16 ‘‘(B) section 446 of the District of Columbia

17 Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization

18 Act (Public Law 93–198; 87 Stat. 801); and

19 ‘‘(C) any other law relating to the budget of the

20 United States Government;

21 ‘‘(34) the Balanced Budget and Emergency

22 Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.);

23 ‘‘(35) section 22(a) of the Act entitled ‘An Act

24 to provide for the fifteenth and subsequent decennial

25 censuses and to provide for apportionment of Rep-
3

•S 1877 PCS

1 resentatives in Congress’, approved June 28, 1929

2 (2 U.S.C. 2a(a));

3 ‘‘(36) section 3514(a)(1)(B) of title 44, United

4 States Code;

5 ‘‘(37) section 202(e) of the Federal Property

6 and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C.

7 483(e));

8 ‘‘(38) section 203(o) of the Federal Property

9 and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C.

10 484(o));

11 ‘‘(39) section 202(e)(1) and (3) of Congres12 sional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 602(e)(1) and

13 (3));

14 ‘‘(40) section 1014(e) of the Congressional

15 Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2

16 U.S.C. 685(e)); and

17 ‘‘(41) section 6 of title 3, United States Code.’’.

18 SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF REPORTS CONSOLIDATION AUTHOR19 ITY.

20 Section 404(b) of the Government Management Re21 form Act of 1994 (31 U.S.C. 501 note) is amended by

22 striking ‘‘December 31, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30,

23 2000’’.

Calendar No. 405

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1877

A BILL

To amend the Federal Report Elimination and

Sunset Act of 1995.

NOVEMBER 8, 1999

Read twice and placed on the calendar
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of St. Jude Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 29, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Donald J. Zurbay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ DONALD J. ZURBAYDonald J. ZurbayVice President, Finance andChief Financial OfficerFebruary 26, 2013
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 10.6








1

















2

















3

















4

















5

















6

















7

















8

















9

















10

















11

















12

















13

















14

















15

















16

















17

















18

















19

















20

















21

















22

















23

















24

















25

















26
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 10199 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 7:13

- cv - 00020

- HL

PENELOPE EDWARDS

- CONRAD, MD, Plaintiff

- Counter Defendant

- Appellant,

versus MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant

- Counter Claimant

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dist rict of Georgia

________________________ ( August 18, 2014 ) Before HULL , MARCUS and WILSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-10199 Date Filed: 08/18/2014 Page: 1 of 32 Penelope Edwards

- Conrad, proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s dismissal of her civil compla int without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civ il
P rocedure 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order . After the district court dismissed the complaint, appellee Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company voluntarily dismissed its counterclaim without prejudice and the court entered a final judgmen t dismissing the case. Typically, “ partial adjudication on the merits , followed by a voluntary dismissal witho u t prejudice of a pending claim, does not effectively terminate the litigation and, therefore, does not satisfy the finality requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1291.” CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City , 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000) (citing Ryan v. Occidental Petroleum Corp. , 577 F.2d 298, 302

– 03 (5th Cir. 1978) 1 ). However, the Ryan rule does not apply here because “there was no attemp t to manufacture [appellate] jurisdiction [,]

. . . [and] the plaintiff/appellant stands to lose all right to appeal if the rule of Ryan applies .” CSX Transp., Inc. , 235 F.3d at 1329. The circumstances we face warrant jurisdiction. We review dismissals un der Fed eral Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for abuse of discretion. Gratton v. Great Am. Commc’ns , 178 F.3d 1373, 1374 (11th Cir. 1999) (per curiam)

. “ While we read briefs filed by pro se litigants liberally, issues

1 In Bonner v. City of Prichard , 661 F.2d 1206 , 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), we adopted as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981.

Case: 14-10199 Date Filed: 08/18/2014 Page: 2 of 33 not briefed on appeal

. . . are deemed abandoned. ” Timson v. Sampson, 518 F.3d 870, 874 (11th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (citation omitted) . “A passing reference to an issue in a brief is not enough, and the failure to make arguments and cite authorities in support of an issue waives it.” Hamilton v. Southland Christian Sch.,
Inc. , 680 F.3d 1316, 1319 (11th Cir. 2012). Additionally, we do not address arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief. Timson , 518 F.3d at 874. We conclude that Edwards

- Conrad abandoned any challenge to the dismissal of her complaint by failing to offer any legal argument or citation to authority in her initial brief

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and judgment

. AFFIRMED. Case: 14-10199 Date Filed: 08/18/2014 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Jack Gregory, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Premier Holding Corp;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  August 13, 2010



/s/  Jack Gregory

Jack Gregory

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1848

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 2000

Referred to the Committee on Resources

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to the

provisions of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Denver Water

Reuse project.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1848 RFH

1 SECTION 1. DENVER WATER REUSE PROJECT.

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the Interior,

3 in cooperation with the appropriate State and local au4 thorities, may participate in the design, planning, and con5 struction of the Denver Water Reuse Project (‘‘Project’’)

6 to reclaim and reuse water in the service area of the Den7 ver Water Department of the city and county of Denver,

8 Colorado.

9 (b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost of

10 the Project shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost.

11 (c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary

12 shall not be used for the operation and maintenance of

13 the Project.

14 (d) FUNDING.—Funds appropriated pursuant to sec15 tion 1615 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Ground16 water Study and Facilities Act may be used for the

17 Project.

18 SEC. 2. RECLAMATION WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER

19 STUDY AND FACILITIES ACT.

20 Design, planning, and construction of the Project au21 thorized by the Act shall be in accordance with, and sub22 ject to the limitations contained in, the Reclamation

23 Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act
3

S 1848 RFH

1 (106 Stat. 4663–4669, 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.), as amend2 ed.

Passed the Senate October 13 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
Pioneer Tax-Free Income Fund
6/30/99 NSAR


Responses to Sub-Item 77M:  Mergers

(a) Pioneer Intermediate Tax-Free Fund

(b) In  accordance  with the terms of an  Agreement  and Plan of  Reorganization
between the  registrant  and Pioneer  Intermediate  Tax-Free  Fund, on March 31,
1999,  Pioneer  Intermediate  Tax-Free Fund transferred all of its assets to the
registrant  in  exchange  for  shares  of  the  registrant.  Those  shares  were
distributed  proportionately  to shareholders of Pioneer  Intermediate Tax- Free
Fund.  The  registrant  also  assumed  Pioneer   Intermediate   Tax-Free  Fund's
liabilities.

Pioneer Intermediate  Tax-Free Fund is in the process of winding-up its affairs,
has filed its final Rule 24f-2  notice and has  prepared  and will soon file its
final semiannual  report on Form N-SAR and an application for  deregistration as
an investment company on Form N-8F.
EXHIBIT
32.2                                                                                                CERTIFICATIONS







CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT
TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I,
Michael J. Shea, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Hooper Holmes, Inc.




Dated:  August 8,
2008




/s/ Michael J. Shea







__________________________




Michael
J. Shea




Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer




This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request
EXHIBIT 10.44**Cing2587.A.003**This Amendment cing2587.A.003, effective as of March 1, 2008 (“Effective Date”), between**StarTek USA, Inc. (“StarTek”),**a Delaware corporation, and **AT&T Mobility LLC,**(“AT&T Mobility”) aDelaware limited liability company, on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, amends the statementof work described below.**RECITALS**WHEREAS, AT&T Wireless and StarTek entered into a Provider Master Service Agreement on January 1,2002 (the “MSA”);WHEREAS AT&T Wireless and StarTek executed Amendment No. 001 dated April 1, 2004 to the MSAincorporating a Statement of Work (“SOW”) to provide services to AT&T Wireless;WHEREAS AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. assigned its rights and delegated its duties under the MSA andall statements of work thereunder to AT&T Mobility;WHEREAS AT&T Mobility and StarTek desire to amend the term of the of the SOW;NOW THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agreeto amend the SOW as follows: 1. Section IV. “Term” of the SOW is hereby deleted in its entirety and it is replaced by thefollowing:    “IV. ‘Term’ This SOW shall begin on April 1, 2004 (“Effective Date”) and end on March 31,2008.”  2. Except as amended by this Amendment, the SOW is not otherwise modified, revoked orsuperseded and remain in full force and effect.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Amendment as of the effective date.   **AT&T Mobility LLC by its authorized** **StarTek USA, Inc.****Representative AT&T Services, Inc.**     By: /s/ Cynthia Barnett By: /s/ A. L. Jones   Printed Name: Cynthia Barnett Printed Name: A. L. Jones   Title: Director — Global Strategic Sourcing Title: CEO   Date: 2/28/2008 Date: 2/28/2008**Proprietary Information**The information contained in this Agreement is not for use or disclosure outside AT&T Mobility, StarTek, their affiliated companies and their third party representatives, except under written Agreement by the contracting Parties.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130479 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130479 COA: 265444 Wayne CC: 04-012511-01 LEE DARNELL SIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk