alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1838

To provide that certain income derived from an agreement between the

Bois Forte Band of Chippewa Indians, the Grand Portage Band of

Chippewa Indians and the State of Minnesota shall not be considered

income for purposes of Federal assistance eligibility.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 1, 1999

Mr. WELLSTONE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To provide that certain income derived from an agreement

between the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa Indians, the

Grand Portage Band of Chippewa Indians and the State

of Minnesota shall not be considered income for purposes

of Federal assistance eligibility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCOME EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL ASSISTANCE

4 ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of

6 the funds paid by the State of Minnesota to the Bois Forte

7 Band of Chippewa Indians and the Grand Portage Band
2

•S 1838 IS

1 of Chippewa Indians pursuant to the agreement of such

2 Bands’ to voluntarily restrict tribal rights to hunt and fish

3 in territory ceded under the Treaty of September 30, 1854

4 (10 Stat. 1109), including all interest accrued on such

5 funds during any period in which such funds are held in

6 a minors’ trust, shall not be considered as income or re7 sources, or otherwise be used as the basis for denying or

8 reducing the financial assistance or other benefits to which

9 a household or member of such Bands would be entitled

10 to under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.),

11 the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Rec12 onciliation Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–193; 110 Stat.

13 2105) and the amendments made by such Act, or any Fed14 eral or Federally assisted program.

Æ
Exhibit 11

           Statement re computation of per-share earnings


Basic per share data is calculated based on the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during the reported period.  Diluted per share data
includes any dilution from potential common stock outstanding, such as the
exercise of stock options.

                           Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                               September 30,           September 30,
                             1999       1998        1999         1998
                         __________  __________  __________  __________

Numerator:
  Net income(loss)       $1,440,000  $3,053,000  $7,600,000  $9,082,000
                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

Denominator:
  Denominator for
    basic income
    (loss) per
    share -
    weighted average
    shares                7,209,775   6,996,387   7,183,215   6,981,195

Dilutive potential
 common shares -
  employee stock
    options                  15,675     33,896       24,251      32,581
                         __________  __________  __________  __________

Denominator for
  diluted earnings
  (loss) per share -
  adjusted weighted
  average shares          7,225,450   7,030,283   7,207,466   7,013,776
                         ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00359-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.R., T. R., AND 

R.N.-R., CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 231st District Court

of Tarrant County (231-679118-20)

April 15, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00170

- CV
Alicia H. Palomo and/or all occupants v. Bosco Credit II, LLC
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 20

- 4243

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , Alicia H. Palomo and / or all occupants , and Patricia Barrera and Javier Barrera , as suret ies on the supersedeas bond

. We further order this decision certified be low for observance. August 26, 2021
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Integrated Security Systems, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.





April 22, 2010

/s/ BROOKS SHERMAN

Brooks Sherman

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
Bluefly, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Melissa Payner-Gregor, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 
 2.  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Melissa
Payner-Gregor
 
 Melissa
Payner-Gregor
 Chief
Executive Officer
 February
16, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS








CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











I, Ransom J. Parker, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Hooper Holmes, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hooper Holmes, Inc.





Dated:  November 5, 2010











/s/ Ransom J. Parker





__________________________





Ransom J. Parker





Chief Executive Officer and President





This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hooper Holmes, Inc. and will be retained by Hooper Holmes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
S. 1705

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to enter into land exchanges to acquire

from the private owner and to convey to the State of Idaho approximately 1,240

acres of land near the City of Rocks National Reserve, Idaho, and for other

purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Castle Rock Ranch Acquisition

Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) MONUMENT.—The term ‘‘Monument’’ means the

Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, Idaho, depicted

on the National Park Service map numbered 300/80,000, C.O.

No. 161, and dated January 7, 1998.

(2) RANCH.—The term ‘‘Ranch’’ means the land comprising

approximately 1,240 acres situated outside the boundary of

the Reserve, known as the ‘‘Castle Rock Ranch’’.

(3) RESERVE.—The term ‘‘Reserve’’ means the City of Rocks

National Reserve, located near Almo, Idaho, depicted on the

National Park Service map numbered 003/80,018, C.O. No.

169, and dated March 25, 1999.

(4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary

of the Interior.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF CASTLE ROCK RANCH.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary shall

acquire, by donation or by purchase with donated or appropriated

funds, the Ranch.

(b) CONSENT OF LANDOWNER.—The Secretary shall acquire land

under subsection (a) only with the consent of the owner of the

land.

SEC. 4. LAND EXCHANGE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—

(1) FEDERAL AND STATE EXCHANGE.—Subject to subsection

(b), on completion of the acquisition under section 3(a), the

Secretary shall convey the Ranch to the State of Idaho in

exchange for approximately 492.87 acres of land near

Hagerman, Idaho, located within the boundary of the Monument.

(2) STATE AND PRIVATE LANDOWNER EXCHANGE.—On

completion of the exchange under paragraph (1), the State
S. 1705—2

of Idaho may exchange portions of the Ranch for private land

within the boundaries of the Reserve, with the consent of

the owners of the private land.

(b) CONDITION OF EXCHANGE.—As a condition of the land

exchange under subsection (a)(1), the State of Idaho shall administer all private land acquired within the Reserve through an

exchange under this Act in accordance with title II of the ArizonaIdaho Conservation Act of 1988 (16 U.S.C. 460yy et seq.).

(c) ADMINISTRATION.—State land acquired by the United States

in the land exchange under subsection (a)(1) shall be administered

by the Secretary as part of the Monument.

(d) NO EXPANSION OF RESERVE.—Acquisition of the Ranch by

a Federal or State agency shall not constitute any expansion of

the Reserve.

(e) NO EFFECT ON EASEMENTS.—Nothing in this Act affects

any easement in existence on the date of enactment of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1922

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a tax credit for

modifications to inter-city buses required under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 16, 1999

Mr. KERREY (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a tax credit for modifications to inter-city buses required

under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CREDIT FOR MODIFICATIONS TO INTER-CITY

4 BUSES REQUIRED UNDER THE AMERICANS

5 WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 44 of the

7 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to expenditures

8 to provide access to disabled individuals) is amended to

9 read as follows:
2

•S 1922 IS

1 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—For purposes of section 38,

2 the amount of the disabled access credit determined under

3 this section for any taxable year shall be an amount equal

4 to the sum of—

5 ‘‘(1) in the case of an eligible small business, 50

6 percent of so much of the eligible access expendi7 tures for the taxable year as exceed $250 but do not

8 exceed $10,250, and

9 ‘‘(2) 50 percent of so much of the eligible bus

10 access expenditures for the taxable year with respect

11 to each eligible bus as exceed $250 but do not ex12 ceed $30,250.’’.

13 (b) ELIGIBLE BUS ACCESS EXPENDITURES.—Sec14 tion 44 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended

15 by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e)

16 and (f), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (c)

17 the following new subsection:

18 ‘‘(d) ELIGIBLE BUS ACCESS EXPENDITURES.—For

19 purposes of this section—

20 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘eligible bus ac21 cess expenditures’ means amounts paid or incurred

22 by the taxpayer for the purpose of enabling the tax23 payer’s eligible bus to comply with applicable re24 quirements under the Americans With Disabilities
3

•S 1922 IS

1 Act of 1990 (as in effect on the date of the enact2 ment of this subsection).

3 ‘‘(2) CERTAIN EXPENDITURES NOT IN4 CLUDED.—The amount of eligible bus access ex5 penditures otherwise taken into account under sub6 section (a)(2) shall be reduced to the extent that

7 funds for such expenditures are received under any

8 Federal, State, or local program.

9 ‘‘(3) ELIGIBLE BUS.—The term ‘eligible bus’

10 means any automobile bus eligible for a refund

11 under section 6427(b) by reason of transportation

12 described in section 6427(b)(1)(A).’’.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

15 December 31, 1999.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1834

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to restore medicaid eligibility

for certain supplementary security income beneficiaries.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 29, 1999

Mr. DASCHLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to restore

medicaid eligibility for certain supplementary security income beneficiaries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Eligibility

5 Restoration Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY FOR CER7 TAIN SSI BENEFICIARIES.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(II) of

9 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

10 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(II)) is amended—
2

•S 1834 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘, but for section 1611(c)(7),

2 would be paid under that title, or with respect to

3 whom such benefits’’ after ‘‘(or’’

4 (2) by striking ‘‘(P.L. 104–193))’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘(P.L. 104–193)’’;

6 (3) by inserting a comma after ‘‘that section’’;

7 and

8 (4) by inserting ‘‘)’’ after ‘‘1905(q))’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 subsection (a) take effect as if included in the enactment

11 of section 204 of the Personal Responsibility and Work

12 Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–

13 193; 110 Stat. 2187).

Æ
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of New Millennium Products  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending  December 31, 2008, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the"Report"),  I, Learned J. Hand, Chief Executive and Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

/s/Learned J. Hand

By:Learned J. Hand

ChiefExecutive and Financial Officer

February9, 2009
**Exhibit 31.1**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 302(a) OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Colin
      Halpern, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Universal Services Group,
      Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report; and




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report.




DATE:
                August 15, 2007/s/
                COLIN HALPERNColin
                Halpern
                Chief
                  Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
                  Officer
Slip Op. 15-99 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE DONGBU STEEL CO., LTD., Plaintiff, and UNION STEEL MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., Consolidated Plaintiff,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and NUCOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge Consol. Court No. 14-00098

JUDGMENT The U.S. Department of Commerce has filed its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (July 27, 2015) (“Re mand Results”), ECF No. 51, pursuant to Dongbu Steel Co. v. United St ates, 39 CIT __, Slip. Op. 15- 43 (May 5, 2015) (“Dongbu”), ECF No. 48. Given that the Remand Results comply with the court’s remand order and that no party contests the Remand Results, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained; and it is further ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see Dongbu, Consol. Court No. 14-00098 (USCIT Apr. 15, 2014) (order granting consent motion for preliminaryCourt No. 14-00098 Page 2 injunction), ECF No. 10, must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Se ction 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

/s/ Claire R. Kelly Claire R. Kelly, Judge Dated: August 31, 2015 New York, New York
Exhibit 18

May 11, 1998

To the Board of Directors of
Excel Industries, Inc.

We have been furnished with a copy of the Company's Form 10-Q 
for the quarter ended March 28, 1998.  Note 6 therein describes 
a change in the method of depreciation of plant and equipment 
from predominantly accelerated methods, declining balance, to 
the straight-line method.  It should be understood that the 
preferability of one acceptable method of depreciation 
accounting over another has not been addressed in any 
authoritative literature and in arriving at our opinion 
expressed below, we have relied on management's business 
planning and judgment.  Based upon our discussions with 
management and the stated reasons for the change, we believe 
that such change represents, in your circumstances, the adoption 
of a preferable alternative accounting principle for 
depreciation in conformity with Accounting Principles Board 
Opinion No. 20.

We have not made an audit in accordance with generally accepted 
auditing standards of the financial statements of Excel 
Industries, Inc. for the three-month periods ended March 28, 
1998 or March 29, 1997 and, accordingly, we express no opinion 
thereon or on the financial information filed as part of the 
Form 10-Q of which this letter is to be an exhibit.



Yours very truly,



S/Price Waterhouse LLP
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1614

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel LUCKY DOG.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 22, 1999

Mr. MACK (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

LUCKY DOG.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United

8 States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue
2

•S 1614 IS

1 a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorse2 ment for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

3 LUCKY DOG, of St. Petersburg, Florida, State of Florida

4 registration number FLZP7569E373.

Æ