alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,423
<PP&E>                                           5,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,859
<BONDS>                                          4,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,560
<SALES>                                          4,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,619
<CGS>                                            3,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (148)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (222)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-11244

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00041-RH-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO ANTWAN BISHOP,

a.k.a. Godfather,

a.k.a. Sugar Bear,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(February 6, 2019)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-11244 Date Filed: 02/06/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Donna Duncan, appointed counsel for Pedro Bishop in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Bishop’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-11244 Date Filed: 02/06/2019 Page: 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-38867 and 333-53557 on Form S-8 of Renaissance Learning, Inc. of our reports
dated January 17, 2003 (which reports express an unqualified opinion and include
an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets"), appearing
in this Form 10-K of Renaissance Learning, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2002.

                                 /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

                                 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
March 5, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         144,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,337,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    568,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,294,671
<PP&E>                                         944,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,425,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,903,443
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,023
<COMMON>                                       105,641
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,902,569)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,425,082
<SALES>                                      4,977,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,977,783
<CGS>                                        3,328,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,328,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,890,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             434,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,676,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (51,858)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,624,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,624,368)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUN 5 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN KERRY HARP,

Petitioner-Appellant,

 v.

EDWARD L. EVANS; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

OKLAHOMA,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 97-6007

(D.C. No. 96-CV-774)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner Steven Kerry Harp appeals the judgment of the district court denying his

petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He challenges his state

convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, and possession of

marijuana without a tax stamp, contending they were based on evidence seized in
-2-

violation of the Fourth Amendment. Specifically, he argues the police believed he had

drugs in his car, but lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause for a stop or search for

drugs and used a traffic violation as a pretext to stop his car to search for drugs. We deny

petitioner a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, a provision of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act, an appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from a final order in §

2254 proceedings unless the petitioner has obtained a certificate of appealability by

making a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Here, petitioner has

not made such a showing.

Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule claims are not cognizable in federal habeas

corpus proceedings if the petitioner had an opportunity for full and fair litigation of the

claim in state court. Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976). Petitioner had that

opportunity and used it fully. Petitioner raised the Fourth Amendment issue in state court

in a motion to suppress. After an evidentiary hearing and extensive oral argument, the

state trial court resolved conflicting evidence and found the police had probable cause to

stop and arrest petitioner for driving while under the influence and that the stop was not a

pretext for a search for drugs. Petitioner raised the issue on appeal to the Oklahoma

Court of Criminal Appeals, but the court rejected his arguments and affirmed his

convictions.

We DENY petitioner a certificate of appealability and DISMISS the appeal. The

mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe

Circuit Judge
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gil Hochboim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 30, 2015


By:

/s/ Gil Hochboim

Name: Gil Hochboim

Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, the undersigned, Michael T. Kennedy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Radnor Holdings Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys annual report on Form 10-K/A for the most recent fiscal year (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                                                       
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | 
|Dated:    August 6, 2004 |  | /S/    MICHAEL T. KENNEDY                                                             
|                         |  |                                                                                       
|                         |  | Michael T. Kennedy President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
      undersigned, Colin Halpern, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial
      Officer and Director of Universal Services Group, Inc. (the "Company"),
      certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
      for the three month period ended May 1, 2003 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      August 15, 2007







/s/
      Colin
      Halpern





Colin
      Halpern


Chief
      Executive Officer, Acting


Chief
      Financial Officer and Director




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

David E. Hershberg, Chief Executive Officerof Globecomm Systems Inc., and Andrew C. Melfi, Chief Financial Officerof Globecomm Systems Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that the annual report of Globecomm Systems Inc. on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended June  30,  2006 (the‘‘Annual Report’’) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Globecomm SystemsInc.

|                            |  |  |                                                                   |  |  |        |
|----------------------------|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--------|
| Date: September  13,  2006 |  |  | By: /s/DAVID E. HERSHBERG                                         |  |  |   |
|                       |  |  | David E.HershbergChairman of the Board andChief ExecutiveOfficer  |  |  |   |
|                       |  |  | By:/s/ ANDREW C.MELFI                                             |  |  |   |
|                       |  |  | AndrewC. MelfiVice President, Chief Financial OfficerandTreasurer |  |  |   |
|                            |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided toGlobecomm Systems Inc. and will be retained by Globecomm Systems Inc.and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth J. Saunders, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peregrine Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



| |  | Date:                                                                                        |  | December 20, 2004
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
| |  | /s/KENNETH J. SAUNDERSKenneth J. Saunders
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 23.1
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement Form
S-8 No. 333-28739  pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option / Stock Issuance Plan and
the  Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan  of  PSW  Technologies,  Inc.,  and  in the
Registration  Statement  Form S-8 No.  333-59873  pertaining  to the 1996  Stock
Option/Stock  Issuance Plan of our report dated January 28,1999, with respect to
the financial statements of PSW Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Austin, Texas
March 26, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Xun Energy Inc.   (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  January 13, 2011



By: /s/ Peter Matousek



Peter Matousek



Chief Financial Officer
296 P.2d 459

#### Matter of the Investigation of Motor Carrier Operations of ARROW TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, PORTLAND, OREGON.

No. 8408.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

April 20, 1956.

Wm. P. Ellis, Portland, Or., Maurice H. Greene, Boise, for appellant.

Graydon W. Smith, Atty. Gen., Kenneth G. Bergquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Arrow Transportation Company appealed from certain orders of the Public Utilities Commission, by notice filed December 1, 1955. On January 25, 1956, appellant deposited $300 with the secretary of the commission in lieu of an undertaking on appeal. The respondent Public Utilities Commission has moved to dismiss the *524appeal on the ground that no undertaking was filed or deposit of money made at the time of filing the notice of appeal or within five days thereafter, as required by § 13-202, I.C. This section is one of the provisions of the code of civil procedure, governing appeals from the district courts to the supreme court in civil actions. Chapter 6 of Title 61, I.C., provides procedure before the commission and for appeals therefrom to this court. Section 61-632 thereof is:

> “The provisions of the code of civil procedure relative to appeals from the district court, except in and so far as they are inconsistent herewith, shall apply to appeals from orders of the public utilities commission.” § 61-632, I.C.

In resisting the motion, appellant contends that no appeal bond is required in an appeal from an order of the commission, because none is required by Chapter 6, Title 61, supra, and for that reason urges that § 13-202, I.C., requiring a bond on an appeal from the district court, is inconsistent with the requirements of Chapter 6, Title 61.

We see no inconsistency and hold that the bond provided for in § 13-202 is required in an appeal from an order of the Public Utilities Commission by virtue of § 61-632.

No bond having been filed or deposited within the time limited, the appeal is dismissed. Marine Mart v. Kruger, 75 Idaho 345, 272 P.2d 307; Farmers Equipment Co. v. Clinger, 70 Idaho 501, 222 P.2d 1077; Jordan v. Jordan, 75 Idaho 512, 275 P.2d 669.
Exhibit 8.1  Subsidiaries of Registrant  Celestica Cayman Holdings 1 Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation;  Celestica Cayman Holdings 9 Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation;  Celestica (Dongguan-SSL) Technology Limited, a China corporation;  Celestica Electronics (S) Pte Ltd, a Singapore corporation;  Celestica (Gibraltar) Limited, a Gibraltar corporation;  Celestica Holdings Pte Limited, a Singapore corporation;  Celestica Hong Kong Limited, a Hong Kong corporation;  Celestica LLC, a Delaware, U.S. limited liability company;  Celestica Liquidity Management Hungary Limited Liability Company, a Hungary corporation;  Celestica (Luxembourg) S.À.R.L., a Luxembourg corporation;  Celestica (Thailand) Limited, a Thailand corporation;  Celestica (USA) Inc., a Delaware, U.S. corporation;  Celestica (US Holdings) LLC, a Delaware, U.S. limited liability company;  1681714 Ontario Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation;  1755630 Ontario Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation; and  3250297 Nova Scotia Company (formerly 1282087 Ontario Inc.), a Nova Scotia, Canada company.