alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-687V

UNPUBLISHED

ANNA MARIE LORETAN,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 19, 2021

Voluntary dismissal; Order 

concluding proceedings.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On January 12, 2021, Anna Marie Loretan filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 

34.

2 Petitioner alleged that she suffered an adverse reaction to an influenza vaccination 

that she received on March 3, 2020. Petition at 1. On February 18, 2021, Petitioner 

submitted a notice of voluntary dismissal.

In light of Petitioner’s “notice of dismissal at any time before service of 

respondent’s report” pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), this case is dismissed without 

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00476-CR

MICHAEL JOSEPH PERCY, JR. APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Michael Joseph Percy, Jr. attempts to appeal from his conviction 

for intoxication manslaughter. Pursuant to a plea bargain, Percy pleaded true to 

the State’s motion to revoke. Percy also signed a waiver of his right to appeal as 

part of the plea bargain. The trial court sentenced him to eight years’ 

confinement in accordance with the plea bargain. The trial court’s certification of 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

his right to appeal states that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” 

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

On October 2, 2013, we notified Percy that this appeal may be dismissed 

based on the trial court’s certification unless he or any party desiring to continue 

the appeal filed a response on or before October 14, 2013, showing grounds for 

continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. Percy filed a 

response, but it does not state any grounds for continuing the appeal.

In accordance with the trial court’s certification, we therefore dismiss this 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 7, 2013
463 A.2d 35

#### Miller v. Miller, Appellant.

Submitted February 4, 1983.

Michael D. Fioretti, for appellant; George P. Stahl, Jr., for appellee.

*638Before WIEAND, McEWEN and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Order affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
--------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-20137 of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch Preferred Capital Trust II
and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding II, L.P. on Form S-3 of our reports dated
March 24, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust II and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding II, L.P. for the
year ended December 30, 2005.

/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 24, 2006
S. 1606

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To extend for 9 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of title 11,

United States Code, is reenacted.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105–277,

as amended by Public Law 106–5, is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘October 1, 1999’’ each place it appears

and inserting ‘‘July 1, 2000’’; and

(2) in subsection (a)—

(A) by striking ‘‘March 31, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 1999’’; and

(B) by striking ‘‘April 1, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘October

1, 1999’’.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on October

1, 1999.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32

MYSKIN, INC.

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of MySkin,
Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|May 17, 2013                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                 | 
|                                                                 | 
|/s/ Marichelle Stoppenhagen                                      | 
|Name: Marichelle Stoppenhagen
        Title: CEO, President& CFO | 
|                                                                 |
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          11,347
<SECURITIES>                                    17,008
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                       800
<INVENTORY>                                     24,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,606
<PP&E>                                          88,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,067
<BONDS>                                          7,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           777
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,285
<SALES>                                         83,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,728
<CGS>                                           64,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (838)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 3, 2019

Before

     DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

     

     MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge

     MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER, Circuit Judge

     

No. 18‐2228

RONNIE L. WINSTED, JR.,

    Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,  

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

    Defendant‐Appellee.

   

Appeal from the  

United States District Court for the  

Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute

Division.

No. 2:17‐cv‐00137‐MJD‐WTL

Mark J. Dinsmore,  

Magistrate Judge.

    

O R D E R

Defendant‐appellee filed a petition for rehearing on March 25, 2019. All of the

judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing and to issue an amended opinion.

This court’s opinion dated February 8, 2019, is amended in a separately filed opinion

released today.  

The petition for rehearing is therefore DENIED.
Applied Signal Technology, Inc.
  Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Signal Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L. Yancey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: September 12, 2003
        --------------------------------- |  | /s/ Gary L. Yancey
        ------------------------------------------------------------
      Gary L. YanceyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Applied Signal Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Applied Signal Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form of 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), regardless of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 4.9
                          FORM OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is effective ___________ (the
"Effective Date"), by and between Assembly and Manufacturing Systems, Inc.
("AMS"), a California Corporation, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of SGI
International ("SGI"), and ______________, an individual ("Employee").

In consideration of the mutual agreements and the promises herein contained,
the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Employment. AMS hereby employs Employee and Employee hereby accepts
employment with AMS on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

2. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective
Date and Employee's employment shall continue until terminated, which may be
done by either party for any reason, or no reason, with or without cause or
advance notice. This Agreement shall govern the relationship between Employee
and AMS until December 31, 2000, at which time this Agreement shall terminate.

3. Duties. Employee shall devote his full productive time to the duties
assigned to him. "Full productive time" is hereby defined as that time
reasonably necessary to perform his required duties in a timely manner, but not
less than forty (40) hours per week, for fifty-two (52) weeks per year, less
holidays, sick leave, and vacation time in accordance with the then-prevailing
policies of AMS.

4. Compensation. In consideration of Employee's performing the duties described
herein, AMS agrees to compensate employee as set forth in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and incorporated herein, payable on a weekly basis. Employee shall also
be covered by AMS's Group Medical Insurance, and such other group benefits
granted to employees pursuant to the then prevailing policies of AMS.

Employee has received and shall also receive:

(a) As incentive compensation, such bonuses and benefits as AMS or SGI's Board
of Directors, in its sole discretion, shall determine.

(b) As further incentive compensation, SGI Warrants in an amount to be decided
in the sole discretion of SGI's Board of Directors.

(c) Reimbursement of reasonable business expenses incurred by Employee in
accordance with AMS's policies.

5. Integration. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended, except by a
writing signed by both parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed at Simi Valley, California.

Assembly and Manufacturing Systems, Inc.                Employee

By:----------------------------                         -------------------
Amir Khiabani, President
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40291

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTRICE SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:10-CR-133-4

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Martrice Smith has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Smith has filed responses. The record is insufficiently developed to

allow consideration at this time of Smith’s claims of ineffective assistance of

counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they

have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 16, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-40291 Document: 00512209863 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
No. 12-40291

develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell,

470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation

omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

record reflected therein, as well as Smith’s responses. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-40291 Document: 00512209863 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March

30 , 2021

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00140

- CV

IN RE HOUSTON AVIATION PARTNERS, LLC D/B/A MILLION AIR HOUSTON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 54209



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 12, 2021 , relator Houston Aviation Partners, LLC d/b/a Million Air
Houston filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator ask s this court to compel the Honorable C. Elliott Thornton, presiding judge of the 164th District
Court of Harris County , to vacate his November 4, 2020 denying relator’s plea to2

the jurisdiction, grant the same, and dismiss real party in interest’s claims against
relator.

Relator has not shown that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Spain.
Appellant argues that a translation inaccuracy caused counsel 

to ask the landlord if appellant had paid rent at the landlord's office 

instead of at the apartment, thereby denying him the opportunity to 

demonstrate that he had paid rent to the landlord. Even if an inaccuracy 

occurred, 1appellant fails to demonstrate that the substance of his 

statements was fundamentally altered as counsel asked the landlord if 

appellant came to see him in order to pay rent and the landlord testified 

that the only one who paid any money for the rent was the victim 

Having considered appellant's claim and concluded that relief 

is not warranted, we 

ORDER the amended judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

Cherry 

1We note that appellant has not demonstrated a translation 

inaccuracy as outlined in Ouanbengboune as he failed to submit a 

translation of his statements to counsel establishing the interpreter's error 

but merely asserts that there was a misinterpretation. 

2 
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

Kay Ellen Armstrong 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City District Attorney 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with Amendment No. 1 to
the Annual Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kara B. Jenny, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.  The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Kara B.
Jenny





Kara B.
Jenny


Chief
Financial Officer


March 10,
2009
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Radiologix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sami S. Abbasi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Sami S. Abbasi                                  
|Sami S. Abbasi President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: March 15, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Radiologix, Inc. and will be retained by Radiologix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MATTHEW J. JACKSON, SR.,1§ No. 705, 2015

§

§ Court Below: Family Court

Respondent Below-Appellant, § of the State of Delaware

§

v. § File Nos.: 14-04-1TK

§ 15-06-1TK

DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, §

§ Petition Nos.: 14-08217

Petitioner Below-Appellee. § 15-15503

Submitted: August 17, 2016

Decided: August 17, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and VAUGHN, Justices. 

O R D E R

This 17th day of August 2016, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and 

the record below, we find that the judgment of the Family Court should be 

affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the Family Court’s

well-reasoned decision dated December 4, 2015 terminating the parental rights of 

the appellant.

2

 

1

The Court assigned this pseudonym under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).

2 Div. of Family Servs. v. Jackson, Nos. 14-08217, 15-15503 (Del. Fam. Ct. Dec. 4, 2015).
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, the undersigned, Michael V. Valenza, the Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Radnor Holdings Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the
period ended December 27, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: October 16, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.