alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1567

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 223

Broad Street in Albany, Georgia, as the ‘‘C.B. King

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1567 RFH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 223 Broad

3 Street in Albany, Georgia, shall be known and designated

4 as the ‘‘C.B. King United States Courthouse’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

8 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

9 to be a reference to the ‘‘C.B. King United States Court10 house’’.

Passed the Senate October 8, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-5166 

ALEX W. CHERBANAEFF and 

ANN CHERBANAEFF, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Jeffrey D. Moffatt, Law Offices of Jeffrey D. Moffatt, of Lancaster, California, 

argued for plaintiffs-appellants. 

Kathleen E. Lyon, Attorney, Appellate Section, Tax Division, United States 

Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on 

the brief were Nathan J. Hochman, Assistant Attorney General; and Bruce R. Ellisen, 

Attorney. 

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims 

Judge Nancy B. Firestone 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2007-5166 

ALEX W. CHERBANAEFF and 

ANN CHERBANAEFF, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in CASE NO(S). 06-CV-0640 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED November 26, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
**Exhibit 31.1**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 302(a) OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      Colin
      Halpern, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Universal Services Group,
      Inc.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report; and




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report.




DATE:
        August 15, 2007




/s/
                COLIN HALPERNColin
                HalpernChief
                Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       

<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       14,897
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             18,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  37,949
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       62,315
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         63,714
<LOANS>                                     300,920
<ALLOWANCE>                                   3,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              448,599
<DEPOSITS>                                  401,352
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           6,568
<LONG-TERM>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      2,129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   38,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              448,599
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               6,214
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             1,450
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                280
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              7,944
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            3,895
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3,895
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         4,049
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   345
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               2,534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,853
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    1,853
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.09
<LOANS-NON>                                   3,081
<LOANS-PAST>                                  2,223
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                974                      
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               6,528
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              3,190                             
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   106
<RECOVERIES>                                     11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             3,440
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          3,440
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2 – Sarbanes-Oxley – 302 Certifications
I, Daniel H. Popky, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Florida East CoastIndustries, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Reserved]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: 4/23/04 By: /s/ Daniel H. Popky       Daniel H. Popky, Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
767 P.2d 275

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raymond X. SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17561.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Jan. 3, 1989.

*433Jeff M. Brudie, Knowlton, Miles & Meri-ca, Lewiston, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Michael A. Henderson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Raymond Scott appeals from a judgment imposing a three-year sentence for the felony of driving while his driving privileges were suspended. I.C. § 18-8001(4). The sentence requires Scott to serve the first year in confinement. He will be eligible for parole or discharge only during the remaining two-year indeterminate part of the sentence. I.C. § 19-2513 (Unified Sentencing Act). The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the district court abused its sentencing discretion. We hold the sentence was not excessive and we affirm the judgment of conviction.

When Scott pled guilty to the present crime, he had already been convicted three times for the same offense over a period of less than five years. Driving without privileges is ordinarily a misdemeanor; however, under I.C. § 18-8001(4) any person found guilty of more than two such violations within five years is guilty of a felony. On Scott's third conviction for this offense he was sentenced to a three-year term of incarceration. This sentence was commuted to a one-year term in the Nez Perce County jail. Subsequently, he committed his fourth violation, resulting in the present judgment.

Scott s presentence investigation report shows convictions for at least thirty-six misdemeanors, mostly traffic offenses, including leaving the scene of an accident and four convictions for driving under the influence. Scott also had served time in the Idaho State Penitentiary for forgery and had received a suspended sentence in a federal court for an assault with intent to commit murder.

In sum, the record shows that Scott has an alarming predilection to repeat offenses for which he has often been sentenced. The latest crime is but one example. The resultant sentence is hardly an improper or unforeseeable consequence of his irresponsible conduct.

Having reviewed the full record and having considered the sentencing'criteria set forth in *State v. Toohill,*103 Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct.App.1982), we conclude' that the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the sentence. We affirm the judgment.

WALTERS, C.J., and BURNETT, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                      2348662
<SECURITIES>                                2013980
<RECEIVABLES>                               2594797
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                 5389994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           12959394
<PP&E>                                      7558021
<DEPRECIATION>                              4030048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             16624830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       3902324
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                    2719611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  9815295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               16624830
<SALES>                                     4640053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4811585
<CGS>                                       3151806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3151806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             269274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              506463
<INCOME-TAX>                                 180148
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          326315
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 326315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________

_____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 7, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130763 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE FRANK SICURE LLO, JR., KENNETH PENLEY, II, and COLE TRISTAN PENLEY,

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 130763 COA: 264566 Berrien CC Family Division: 04-000096-NA DANA M. PENLEY, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the February 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0404 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 7, 2006

Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32.1  Sarbanes-Oxley  906 Certification November 2, 2004 Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549 Ladies and Gentlemen: The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
quarterly report (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code. Robert W. Anestis, the Chief Executive Officer and Daniel H. Popky, the Chief
Financial Officer of Florida East Coast Industries, Inc., each certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Florida East Coast
Industries, Inc. /s/ Robert W. Anestis
Robert W. AnestisChief Executive Officer/s/ Daniel H. Popky
Daniel H. PopkyChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Florida East Coast Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Florida
East Coast Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. 38
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   SCHEDULE 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                STATE OF INCORPORATION     OTHER TRADE NAME
---------------------               ----------------------     ----------------
<S>                                 <C>                        <C>

Argenbright Holdings                Georgia                    --
Limited

Argenbright, Inc.                   Georgia                    RightSide Up
                                                               Lloyd Creative Staffing
                                                               Midwest Staffing
                                                               Gage Marketing
                                                               SES Staffing
                                                               EMD
                                                               TUJA
                                                               Verfurth
                                                               PIMMS
                                                               Service Advantage
                                                               CDI

AHL Alpha, Inc.                     Illinois                   --

Argenbright Security Inc.           Georgia                    Intersec
                                                               USA Security
                                                               UNICCO

AHL Beta, Inc.                      Illinois                   --

AHL Delta, Inc.                     Illinois                   --


Argenbright Motor Coach,            Georgia                    --
Inc.

Argenbright Substance               Georgia                    --
Testing, Inc.

The ADI Group Limited               United Kingdom             --

ADI U.K. Limited                    United Kingdom             --


Aviation Defense                    United Kingdom             --
International Germany
Limited

ADI Alpha Holdings Gmbh             Germany                    --

Aviation Defense International      United Kingdom             --
France Limited

ADI Overseas, Ltd.                  United Kingdom             --

Argenbright BV                      Netherlands                --

AHL Services - Europe               United Kingdom             --

PIMMS Corporation                   Minnesota                  --

</TABLE>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 1/9/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
DANNY DAVIS,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 95-3320
v. (D.C. No. 95-CV-3385) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ELIZABETH COLLINS, Assistant U.S. Attorney; and JANET RENO, United States Attorney General, (D. Kansas)

Respondents - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, and LOGAN , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This matter is before the court on appellant’s motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees. In order to succeed on his motion, an- 2 -

appellant must show both a financial inability to pay the required filing fees and the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Coppedge v. United States , 369 U.S. 438 (1962); Ragan v. Cox , 305 F.2d 58 (10th Cir. 1962). As the district court pointed out in its order, the appellant’s conviction was affirmed on direct appeal by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and his subsequent motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was denied. For the reasons stated in the district court’s order dated September 29, 1995, the appellant makes no reasoned argument which would permit him to relitigate issues already raised. Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees is denied. The appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. Section 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the annual Report of Great Wall Builders Ltd., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended on September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tian Jia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













Dated: October 22, 2010






Great Wall Builders Ltd.,






/s/ Tian Jia




Tian Jia




CEO/CFO
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,


SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)





The undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of F & M Bank Corp., respectively, certify that, to the best of each such individual’s knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31. 2012, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of F & M Bank Corp. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.





August 13, 2012

/s/ Dean W. WithersDean W. WithersPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Neil W. HayslettNeil W. HayslettExecutive Vice President &Chief Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 2

- 3 805

_____________________________
V

. R
., M other of K. R. and L

. R.
, M inor C hild ren , Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Russell S. Roberts , Judge

. November 9, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Amanda Peterson of the Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry
, f

or Appellant

. Sarah J. Rumph, Appellate Counsel, D epartment of Children and Families, Tallahassee, for Appellee ; Sara E. Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, and Charles S.E. Greenberg
, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Defending Best Interests Project, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem

.