alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
908 TITLE

Warehouse Clerk
Wireman

Wireman Foreman
Wireman General Foreman


CRAFT JOB DESCRIPTIONS
TA OF CONTENTS

JOB TIT

Assistant Fire Chief
Assistant Storekeeper

Baker

Body and Fender Mechanic Operator

Body and Fender Mechanic Operator Foreman
Bull Gang Foreman

Bull Gang Worker

Butcher

Carpenter

Carpenter Foreman

Carpenter General Foreman

Carpenter Welder

Cement Mason

Cement Mason Foreman

Chef

Combination Heavy-Duty Repairman & Welder
Combination Heavy-Duty Repairman & Welder Foreman
Combination Heavy-Duty Repairman & Welder General Foreman
Combination Worker

Concrete Mobile Mixer Operator

Cook’s Helper

Crane Operator

Crushing Plant Engineer (Operating Engineer)
Custodian

Derrickman

Dinkey Locomotive Operator
Dinner Cook
Dishwasher/Potwasher

Orill Helper (Core or Rotary)
Driller (Core Drill Type)
Driller (Rotary or Oilfield)

Equipment Greaser

Equipment Greaser Foreman

Equipment Operator

Exchange Attendant

Extra Heavy-Duty Truck Driver

Extra Heavy-Duty Truck Driver Foreman

Extra Heavy-Duty Truck Driver General Foreman

01-31-94


JOB TITLE

Fire Captain

Fire Engineer

Fire Fighter

Fire Prevention Technician I
Fire Prevention Technician IT
Food Server

Forklift Driver

Forklift Driver Foreman
Forklift Operator

Fry Cook

Grade Checker

Head Baker

Head Butcher

Head Custodian

Head Exchange Attendant

Head Pantry

Head Service Attendant

Heavy-Duty Repair Helper (Construction)
Heavy-Duty Repairman (Construction) - Equipment
Heavy-Duty Repairman (Construction) - Fleet
Heavy-Duty Repairman (Maintenance)
Heavy-Duty Repairman Foreman
Heavy-Duty Repairman General Foreman
Heavy-Duty Truck Driver

Heavy-Duty Truck Driver Foreman

Heavy-Duty Welder

High Voltage Electrical Mechanic

High Voltage Line Mechanic

Hoist Operator

Industrial Control Wireman

Inspector/Repairman Welder Foreman (Maintenance)
Instrumentman

Tronworker

Ironworker Foreman

Ironworker General Foreman

Kitchen Steward

Laborer

Laborer Foreman

Laborer General Foreman

Light Duty Truck Driver

Light Vehicle Dispatcher (Maintenance)

Light Vehicle Dispatcher Foreman (Maintenance)
Light Vehicle Dispatcher General Foreman (Maintenance)
Lineman

Lineman Foreman

Lineman General Foreman

Locksmith


908 TITLE

Machinist Foreman
Machinist Operator
Machinist Operator General Foreman
Millwright

Millwright Foreman
Miner

Miner-Welder

Motor Patrol Operator
Motorman - Oilfield
Mucking Machine Operator
Mud Plant Operator

Operator Foreman
Operator General Foreman

Painter

Painter Foreman

Pantry

Pipefitter/Plumber - Welder
Plumber/Refrigeration Mechanic
Plumber/Refrigeration Mechanic Foreman
Plumber/Refrigeration Mechanic General Foreman

Quality Control Inspector (Maintenance)
Road Sprinkler Fitter

Second Cook

Service Attendant

Service Station Attendant
Sheetmetal Foreman
Sheetmetal General Foreman
Sheetmetal Worker
Shifter

Stockroom Clerk
Stockroom Clerk Foreman
Storekeeper

Survey Party Chief

Tireman

Tireman Foreman
Tireman General Foreman
Truck Crane Oiler

Vending Machine Attendant
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

241 

CA 13-01151 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

CATHLEEN CAMACHO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHRISTOPHER CAMACHO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

VENZON LAW FIRM PC, BUFFALO (CATHARINE M. VENZON OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

TIMOTHY J. PAWARSKI, ELMA, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

GAYLE T. MURPHY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, HAMBURG. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Henry J.

Nowak, Jr., J.), entered April 18, 2013. The order, among other

things, denied that part of defendant’s motion seeking access to the

subject child “until the child’s counselor agrees that it would be

appropriate.” 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by vacating the provision conditioning

defendant’s access to the child upon the agreement of the child’s

counselor, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and

the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further

proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant

appeals from an order that, inter alia, denied that part of his motion

seeking access with the parties’ child “until the child’s counselor

agrees that it would be appropriate.” We agree with defendant that

Supreme Court thereby improperly delegated to the child’s counselor

the court’s authority to determine issues involving the best interests

of the child (see Matter of Hameed v Alatawaneh, 19 AD3d 1135, 1136;

Matter of Henrietta D. v Jack K., 272 AD2d 995, 995). We therefore

modify the order accordingly, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court

for a determination of that part of defendant’s motion seeking access

with the child. 

Entered: March 28, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Jack Gregory, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Premier Holding Corp;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: March 3, 2011



/s/  Jack Gregory

Jack Gregory

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
856 P.2d 104

#### Gustavo ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Idaho, Respondent.

No. 20070.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

July 1, 1993.

Ismael Chavez, Caldwell, for appellant.

Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., Thomas P. Watkins, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Gustavo Ortiz appeals from the summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We vacate the dismissal order and remand for consideration of Ortiz’s request for court-appointed counsel which should have been determined prior to disposing of the post-conviction petition.

When he pled guilty in 1990 to sexual abuse of a child, Ortiz was represented by the public defender’s office. He was convicted and sentenced to the custody of the Board of Correction for a term of two to eight years. No direct appeal from his conviction and sentence was taken, and he has been incarcerated since the date of his conviction. In his post-conviction petition, Ortiz enumerated how he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel, and he included a request for court-appointed counsel to assist him in the post-conviction proceeding. Ortiz also filed a separate motion and affidavit of indigency for counsel to be appointed, citing I.C.R. 44 as the basis for his right to counsel.

Idaho Code § 19-4904 provides that a petitioner seeking post-conviction relief is entitled to court-appointed counsel if he has no means to pay for counsel. Here, Ortiz made the required showing of indigency in support of his motion to appoint counsel, although he did not rely on I.C. § 19-4904; but the district court did not rule on his motion.

The district court ordered a conditional dismissal of Ortiz’s petition on May 18, 1992, and entered its summary order of dismissal without ever addressing Ortiz’s request for a court-appointed attorney. Accordingly, our review of the merits of the dismissal of the post-conviction petition must be forestalled. *Henderson v. State,*123 Idaho 138, 844 P.2d 1388 (Ct.App.1992). We vacate the order of dismissal of the petition for post-conviction relief and remand to the district court for action in accordance with this opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             329
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1212
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  6050
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      23566
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            7520
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             30862
<LOANS>                                          44125
<ALLOWANCE>                                        382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   87550
<DEPOSITS>                                       61421
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1350
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       24779
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   87550
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   3721
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2124
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   271
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  6116
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2679
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2679
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3437
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       59
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (18)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    605
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         605
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.45
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       253
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   323
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  382
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               382
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 

 National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

 Phone: 877-222-7570 

 Fax: 513-533-6826 

 

 June 18, 2012 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Subject: Addition of a class of employees from the Sandia National Laboratories to the Special 

Exposure Cohort 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM, as an addition to the 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000. On May 11, 2012, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary 

of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors 

and subcontractors who worked in any area at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, 

New Mexico, from January 1, 1963 through December 31, 1994, for a number of work days 

aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in 

combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes 

of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on June 10, 2012, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on June 10, 2012, members of this class of employees, defined as 

reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 [Signature on file] 

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

 Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  FINANCIAL  DATA  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION
     EXTRACTED  FROM THE FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF BIONX  IMPLANTS,  INC., AND IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     2
<CASH>                                          22,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                       111
<INVENTORY>                                      2,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,893
<PP&E>                                           1,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                     455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,541
<SALES>                                         15,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,014
<CGS>                                            3,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (408)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (752)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                       758
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
### NUMBER 13

- 12

- 00743

- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ EASTON WAYNE SANTOS , A ppellant ,

v.
JOLENE G. REYNA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF JENNY LYNNN GONZALEZ, A MINOR; AND FLORA REYNA AS NEXT FRIEND OF ADRIANA REYNA , A ppellee s

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal fr om the County Court at Law No. 1

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at

Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas, in trial cause number 2012

- CCV

- 60968

- 1

. Appellant has filed a verified motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties2

have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellant

re quests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant = s motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

.
P . 42.1(a). Appellant = s motion to dismiss is GRANTED , and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d)
("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 31st day of January, 2013.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RON THEODORE RUBINO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4193 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 16, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Nicholas Martino, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                        AIR TRANSPORT GROUP HOLDINGS, INC
           FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2009
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arnold  Leonora,  am the Chief  Executive  Officer and acting Chief Financial
Officer  of Air  Transport  Group  Holdings,  Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation  (the
"Company").  I am delivering  this  certificate in connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine month period ended July 31, 2009
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 15, 2009

                                    By: /s/ Arnold Leonora
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Arnold Leonora
                                        President and Director
----

----

| 1.   | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:           January 13, 2011 |                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                                                                     |  /s/ Charles J. Urstadt         |
|                                                                                     | Charles J. Urstadt                   |
|                                                                                     | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

| Dated:           January 13, 2011 |                                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                     |  /s/ John T. Hayes                           |
|                                                                                     | John T. Hayes                                     |
|                                                                                     | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |