alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         440,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,633,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,386,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,710,905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,273,648
<PP&E>                                       1,237,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                 299,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,799,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,618,226
<BONDS>                                      6,090,397
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,803
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,038,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,799,935
<SALES>                                      7,491,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,491,309
<CGS>                                        6,765,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,149,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               321,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               493,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,332,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,332,404)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,460,080)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,792,484)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 6 -00 713 -CR

Ca r y Ev e tt e M e ye r , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF MI LAM COUNTY , 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR2148 5 , HO NORAB LE EDWARD P . MAGRE , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N A jury found appellant Cary Evette Mey er guilty of deliver ing le ss than one g ram of
coca ine. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112 (West 2 0 0 3). The jur y assessed punis hme nt at tw o y e ars in s tate ja il.

Appellant’s c ourt-appointed attorney filed a br ief concludingthat the appe al is f rivolous a nd without mer it. The brief me ets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 3 86 U. S. 738 (1967), by

demonstrating that the only arguable co n t en t i on that might support the a ppeal is ulti mately

without merit. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W .2d 80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S. W
. 2 d 6 8 4 (T ex. C rim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 48 5 S.W. 2d 55 3 (T e x. Cr im. App . 1 97 2) ; Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant re ceive d a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of her rig ht to examine the appellate r ecor d and file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed.2 We have r eviewe d the re cord a nd counsel’s br ief a

nd ag ree that the a

p p e a l is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arg uably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: Nove mber 14, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
S. 1670

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To revise the boundary of Fort Matanzas National Monument, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) MAP.—The term ‘‘Map’’ means the map entitled ‘‘Fort

Matanzas National Monument’’, numbered 347/80,004 and

dated February, 1991.

(2) MONUMENT.—The term ‘‘Monument’’ means the Fort

Matanzas National Monument in Florida.

(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary

of the Interior.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF BOUNDARY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Monument is revised

to include an area totaling approximately 70 acres, as generally

depicted on the Map.

(b) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The Map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the office of the Director of the National

Park Service.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL LAND.

The Secretary may acquire any land, water, or interests in

land that are located within the revised boundary of the Monument

by—

(1) donation;

(2) purchase with donated or appropriated funds;

(3) transfer from any other Federal agency; or

(4) exchange.

SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION.

Subject to applicable laws, all land and interests in land held

by the United States that are included in the revised boundary

under section 2 shall be administered by the Secretary as part

of the Monument.
S. 1670—2

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are

necessary to carry out this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1  Sarbanes-Oxley  906 Certification

Date: October 21, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 of
Florida East Coast Industries, Inc. (the Report) for the purpose of complying
with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code.

Robert W. Anestis, the Chief Executive Officer and Richard G. Smith, the Chief
Financial Officer of Florida East Coast Industries, Inc., each certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act; and                                                                         
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Florida East Coast
Industries, Inc.



| | /s/ Robert W. Anestis                    
| | -----------------------------------------
| |                                          
| | Robert W. Anestis
Chief Executive Officer



| | /s/ Richard G. Smith                    
| | ----------------------------------------
| |                                         
| | Richard G. Smith
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Florida East Coast Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Florida
East Coast Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0480]

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “ Investigational Device Exemptions Reports and Records—21 CFR Part 812” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Daniel Gittleson, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-5156,                         *Daniel.Gittleson@fda.hhs.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 19, 2010 (75 FR 2869), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0078. The approval expires on February 28, 2013. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: April 29, 2010.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-10657 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8)  pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option / Stock Issuance Plan and the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of PSW  Technologies,  Inc., of our report dated January 19,
1998,  with  respect  to the  financial  statements  of PSW  Technologies,  Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December 31, 1997.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Austin, Texas
March 23, 1998
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6458

CASEY RAFAEL TYLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KATY POOLE, Individual and official capacity; WILLIAM BULLARD, Individual 

and official capacity; RONALD COVINGTON, Captain, Individual capacity; 

CAROL TORES, Captain, Individual capacity; JERRY INGRAM, JR., Unit 

Manager, Individual capacity; THORNE LOCKLEAR, Correctional officer, 

Individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:17-cv-01142-WO-JLW)

Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 25, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Casey Rafael Tyler seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation and granting in part and denying in part his motion for summary 

judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); 

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Tyler

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 159

To amend chapter 121 of title 28, United States Code, to increase fees

paid to Federal jurors, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 121 of title 28, United States Code,

to increase fees paid to Federal jurors, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JUROR FEES.

4 Section 1871(b)(1) of title 28, United States Code,

5 is amended by striking ‘‘of $40 per day’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘$45.00 per day’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Mistras Group, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the        requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report.

|                    |   |                       |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
| Dated: January 11, 2010 |   |                       |
|                    |   | /s/ Sotirios J. Vahaviolos |
|                    |   |                       |
|                    |   | Sotirios J. Vahaviolos     |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer    |
|                    |   |                       |
|                    |   | /s/ Paul Peterik           |
|                    |   |                       |
|                    |   | Paul Peterik               |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer    |
|                    |   | Mistras Group, Inc.        |

----
Opinion filed September 9, 2021

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-21-00167-CR

___________

MILTON R. HINSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 350th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14942-D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Milton R. Hinson has filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order denying his

motion to disqualify the judge of the trial court. In the notice of appeal, Appellant 

requests that this court review the ruling made by Presiding Judge Dean Rucker 

regarding the disqualification of Judge Thomas M. Wheeler. We dismiss the appeal. 

When this appeal was filed, the clerk of this court wrote to Appellant and 

informed him that it did not appear that the order from which he was attempting to 
2

appeal was a final, appealable order. We requested that Appellant respond and show 

grounds to continue the appeal. Appellant has not filed a response showing any 

grounds upon which this appeal may be continued. 

An order denying a motion to recuse is not a final, appealable order; it may be 

reviewed only in an appeal from a final judgment. Green v. State, 374 S.W.3d 434, 

445 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). Likewise, an order denying a motion to disqualify is 

not a final, appealable order and may not be appealed by way of an interlocutory 

appeal. Means v. State, 825 S.W.2d 260 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no 

pet.). Because Appellant has attempted to appeal from an interlocutory order 

denying a motion to disqualify, we have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

We note that Appellant has filed an “omnibus motion” in which he requests 

(1) an order of transfer to Burnet County Jail, (2) an order for release of the 

documents filed in the cause below, and (3) an order for release of verbatim 

transcripts in the cause below. Because we have no jurisdiction to entertain this 

appeal, we do not reach the merits of Appellant’s omnibus motion, and we dismiss 

it as moot.

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

September 9, 2021

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
Order entered January 23, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00426-CR

JAVEON DEROID DALCOURZUBER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-10957-J

ORDER

The reporter’s record was filed November 9, 2018. After reviewing the record, the Court 

determined that several exhibits were missing and ordered a supplemental reporter’s record filed 

with those exhibits. Although court reporter Kimberly Xavier filed a supplemental reporter’s 

record on December 27, 2018, State’s Exhibit #60, labeled “CD – Children’s Health Medical 

Records” is still missing from the record.

We ORDER court reporter Kimberly Xavier to file a supplemental reporter’s record 

containing State’s Exhibit #60 within TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. We 

caution Ms. Xavier that the failure to file the supplemental reporter’s record by that date may 

result in the Court taking whatever action it deems appropriate to ensure this appeal proceeds in a 
more timely fashion, including ordering that she not sit until the supplemental reporter’s record 

is filed.

Once the supplemental reporter’s record is filed, the Court will rule on appellant’s 

January 16, 2019 motion to extend time to file his brief.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Gracie Lewis, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No.3; Kimberly Xavier, court reporter, Criminal 

District Court No.3; and counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### The St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad Company v. Charles Waggoner.

[Note: The questions in this case are identical with the preceding case.]

F. M. *&*D. V. Youngblood, attorneys for appellant.

John H. Bain, attorney for appellee.

*652Mr. Justice Scofield

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Except as to the amount of the verdict and judgment, the record in this case is- identical with the record in the case of the above named appellant against John B. Will, decided at the present term of this court. The abstracts and arguments and the questions involved, are the same in both cases. This case was to recover damages for the killing of the horse, and the Will case was to recover damages for the killing of the mule and the breaking of the wagon-tongue. We consider it unnecessary to re-state our reasons for sustaining the judgment of the court below, but we refer counsel and others interested to the opinion filed in the Will case as a sufficient presentation of our views of the questions argued and determined in this case. The judgment is afiirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 45 (Thursday, March 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 12183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Time Perception and Timed 
Performance in Autism.
    Date: March 11, 2008.
    Time: 3:15 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2750464b4b5444674a464e4b09494e4f09404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b6c7a777768785b767a727735757273357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.964, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93,209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 28, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-957 Filed 3-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TheWebDigest Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Adelstein,
President, Director, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Steven Adelstein
------------------------
Steven Adelstein, President, Director,
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

August 14, 2009