IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION TWO
STATE OF WASHINGTON ,

Respondent ,

v. JASON PHILLIP WHITE ,

Appellant

. )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 51460

- 5

- II

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

F EARING , J.

— Jason White challenges his convict ions for eluding a police officer and driving with a license suspended on the theory of ineffective assistance of counsel resulting from his trial attorney’s failure to interview a witness and to summon the witness to testify. We conclude that White fails to show prejudice by reason of any deficient performance of his counsel.
FACTS This opinion gleans its facts from trial testimony. At noon, on March 3, 2016, Sergeant Todd Brightbill of the Multnomah County Sherriff’s Office drove home after finishing his work shift in Troutdale, Oregon. Sergeant Brightbill wore his police uniform and drove a marked patrol vehicle equipped with lights and siren. While heading north on Interstate 205 near the Airport Way exit in Portland, Brightbill noticed a Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two January 22, 2020No. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

2 blue Vol kswagen Passat adorned with Oregon license plate YMM224. The driver of the blue Passat executed an abrupt lane change without signaling, which action caught Brigh tbill’s attention. Brightbill wished to return home, so he did not initiate a traffic stop f or t he unsafe lane change. Sergeant Todd Brightbill continued north on I

- 205 and noticed the same blue Volkswagen Passat traveling on I

- 205 northbound near the Washington State end of t he interstate bridge. Sergeant Brightbill’s patrol car and the blue Pa ssat traveled near the location where the speed limit increases to sixty miles per hour. While Brightbill’s car occupied the left most lane in northbound traffic, the blue Passat passed his patrol ve hicle on the right. The blue Passat traveled at 75 to 8 0 miles per hour as it overtook his vehicle. Brightbill possessed authority to stop vehicles in Clark C ounty, Washington. Sergeant Todd Brightbill peered into the windows of the Volkswagen Passat, and he viewed the driver’s face as the vehicle ove rtook hi s patrol car. Sergeant Brightbill typed the Volkswagen’s license plate number on the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicle computer site and learned of the suspension of the Oregon driver’s license of the registered owner of the car, Jason White. Brightbill , with his patrol car computer, viewed the driver’s license photo for Jason White, which photo matched the appearance of the driver of the blue Passat, except that the driver’s hair appeared shorter than White’s hair in the photograph. Todd Brightbill appr oached the blue Passat from the right side to confirm the driver matched the registered owner ’s picture. The computer still displayed the photo ofNo. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

3 Jason White as Bright b ill approached. Sergeant Brightbill confirmed that the person driving the blue Passat matched the driver’s license picture of the registered owner of the vehicle. Sergeant Todd Brightbill activated the overhead emergency lights on his patrol vehicle in order to stop the Volkswagen Passat. The blue Passat moved from the fast lane to the sl ow lane but did not pull over. The driver maintain ed a constant speed. Sergeant Brightbill drove behind the Passat an d activated his emergency siren

. The blue Passat pulled over to the shoulder of the highway and slowed to about twenty miles per hour. The vehicle did not stop. The Passat then accelerated at a high rate of speed, swerved into traffic lanes, and maneuvered in between other n orthbound vehicles. The blue Passat accelerated to 100 miles per hour. The Passat nearly collided with other cars due to the difference in speed between the Passat and the other traffic. Sergeant Brightbill turned off his emergency lights and siren and discontinued pursuing the vehicle in compliance with his department’s pursuit policies and to reduce the da nger to the public. Brightbill thereafter verified that Washington State had also suspended Jason White’s driver’s
license. The following night, March 4, 2016, Sergeant Todd Brightbill and Multnomah County Sheriff Deputy David Hughes drove to the address, on Sout heast 62nd Avenue in Portland, designated for Jason White by the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles. The deputies stridently knocked on the home’s front door , but no one answered. Deputy Hughes and Sergeant Brightbill saw, in the dwelling’s driveway, a work truck with theNo. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

4 license plate of a truck reg istered to White. Brightbill and Hughes also spotted the blue Volkswagen Passat, driven on March 3, parked fifty yards from White’s house on Southwest Harney Street, which intersects with Southw est 62nd Ave. The blue Passat had the same license plate that Sergeant Brig htbill noted the previous day.
PROCEDURE The State of Washington charged Jason White with one count of attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle and one count of driving while license suspe nded or revoked in the third degr ee. On September 18, 2017, trial counsel for Jason White filed a motion and affidavit requesting additional funds for an investigator at public expense. In the affidavit, defense counsel averred that an investigator had be en assigned to the case and had already contacted possibl e alibi witnesses. The declaration further noted that the investigator would locate and interview other witnesses before trial. On September 20, the Clark
C ounty i ndigent defense c oordinator author ized five additional hours of i nvestigator services. On September 28, 2017, Jason White’s defense counsel filed a motion and declaration for order of trial continuance. Counsel’s declaration stated that White would raise an alibi defense since White worke d in Oregon at the time of the offense. Defense counsel asked for the continuance so that alibi witnesses could be interviewed and sub poenaed for trial. The record does not indicate whether the State opposed the motion or whether the trial court granted the motion.No. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

5 Trial proceeded on December 18, 2017. Sergeant Todd Brightbill testified for the State. He identified in the presence of the jury Jason White as the March 3, 2016 driver of the blue Passat. Michael Clark testified for the defense. Clark at tested that he lived in Longview, Washington and knew Jason White because Clark’s daughter p reviously dated White. Clark declared that he had not been in contact with White during the p ast year before trial. Clark added that, sometime in March 2016, Whit e conveyed to him the blue Volkswagen Passat in order to pay a debt owed Clark. Defense counsel then presented Clark with a sworn statement that Clark made to a Cowlitz County Sheriff’s Deputy in October 2016. In the sworn statement, Clark claimed that h e received the Passat from White in December 2015 or January 2016. After reading the sw orn statement, Clark testified: I believe that must have been more right than March. I thought it was about March.
R eport of Proceedings (R P ) at 91. During further trial testimony, Michael Clark asserted that, when taking possession of the Volkswagen Passat, he retrieved the Passat from Jason White’s Portland house and drove it to Clark’ s residence in Longview. According to Clark, he drove the car one other time aft er he licensed it on April 15, 2016. On this occasion, the Passat malfunctioned and was tow ed to Clark’s residence. The Passat thereafter sat adjacent to Clark’s backdoor to his house under a plastic tarp. Clark also testified that the blue Passat alway s had tinted windows and the defense moved to admit a photo of the Passat that Clark took.No. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

6 The trial court admitted the photo as an exhibit. Clark explained that, because of a disability, he always remained at home and the Passat never left his property.
On cross

- examination, Michael Clark testified that he spoke with Jason White in early April 2016 regarding the missing title to the blue Passat and again before rendering the sworn statement to law enforcement on October 9, 2016. Clark could not unders tand how the car could have been on the I

- 205 bridge between Portland and Vancouver, Washington , on March 3, 2016. Jason White testified at trial. White denied the possibility that he drove the blue
Passat on I

- 205, on March 3, 2016, since he worked at a job site in Beaverton , Oregon that day. White owned his own business and also worked as an employee for Lifetime Remodeling. White asserted that his employer scheduled him to execute work on Cathy Thompson’s Beaverton home for one week near March 3, 2016 . He testified that he and another employee began work at 8:30 a.m., on March 3, the home owner arrived at the location at 10:00 a.m., and the own er left one hour later. White stated that he and his helper continued to work after the home owner departed. He did not leave the Beaverton job site and drive to Washington State on March 3. White added that he lacked time during a lunch break to travel over the bridge to Washington. The defense admitted photographs that White avowed showed the condition of t he Beaverton residence at the beginning and end of the week long repair project. On cross

- examination, White acknowledged that the pictures were undated and that he did not take some photo graphs on March 3.No. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

7 Jason White further testified that, in March 2016 , he no longer possessed the blue Passat. He claimed to only then possess a red Ford F

- 150 pickup. White added that he transferred the blue Passat to Michael Clark in December 2015 or January 2016. He said he spoke with Clark, in April 2016, when he rec eived the summons for this prosecution, about the locat ion of the Passat. Clark replied that the Passat sat at Clark’s house and Clark knew nothing about a March 3 trip across th e Interstate bridge. The State admitted an exhibit , a copy of the summons is sued to White, which pleading did not identify the vehicle allegedly driven by White at the time of t he police pursuit. During the State’s rebuttal presentation, Sergeant Todd Brightbill testified that Michael Clark was “[d]efinitely not” the person drivin g the blue Passat on March 3, as Brightbill saw Clark during the latter’s previous day’s testimony. RP at 136. The prosecution questioned Sergeant Brightbill about the photograph Clark admitted as an exhibit to show the tin t of the Passat’s windows. Bri ghtbill answered: “[i]f they [the windows] were tinted, they had to be a fairly light tint.” RP at 134. After viewing the photograph, Brightbill commented that he could not gauge the level of tint from the picture because he did not know the lighting at the time of the picture or the natur e of the camera used. Brightbill explained that he judges the level of tint in a vehicle by his ability to see an occupant. Brightbill commented that the photo of the Passat failed to show the veh icle’s license plate. Multnomah County Sheriff Deputy David Hughes testified during the State’s rebuttal case. Deputy Hughes testified that he went to an address with Sergeant ToddNo. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

8 Brightbill in southeast Portland on March 4, 2016. According to Hughes, he remembered seeing th at day a red work truck, with ladders and painting supplies, parked in the driveway at the 6 2nd Avenue residence. He told the jury that the red pickup truck was registered to Jason Whit e. Deputy Hughes testified that he and Brightbill located a blue
Pass at, registered to White, within two blocks of the 62nd Avenue home. The jury found Jason White guilty on b oth count I and II. Before sentencing, Jason White moved for a new trial under CrR 7.5(a), while citing grounds of accident, mistake, or surprise. De clarations of defense counsel Alyosha McClain and White accompanied the motion. In his declaration, defense counsel revealed that, on the morning trial began, he learned for the first time of a May 1, 2017 letter from White’s e mployer, Gino Streano.
Jason White attached the May 1, 2017 letter to his declaration. The letter on Lifetime Remodeling stationery read:

Jason White is a sub contractor of Lifetime Remodeling Systems and was scheduled for a full day exterior repair March 3rd 2016 at a residence ma naged by Cath Thompson. This repair was completed to the satisfaction of our homeowner on March 3rd. I have verified that he [White] was scheduled on our scheduling calendar and I also verified that the work was completed and paid for in full by Cathy Th ompson. C lerk’s Papers (C P ) at 46 (Two differing spellings for Thompson’s first name in original). White also appended to his declaration a May 1, 2017 e

- mail message, by which he forwarded the Streano letter to his first attorney and photographs of work performed. In his declaration in support of the motion for new trial, Alyosha McClain testified that, had he known of the letter from White’s employer earlier, he would haveNo. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

9 su bpoenaed Gino Streano. McClain declared that White was not to blame for McCl ain’s ignorance of the letter, since White reasonably believed that his previous attorney shared the letter with McClain. McClain characterized White’s failure to summon Streano as a witness at trial as an ac cident and mistake. During a hearing on the mot ion for a new trial, defense counsel Alyosha McClain remarked: When I took over the case, I had not seen said letter until the morning of trial and I didn’t

— perhaps and maybe it was defense counsel’s fault for not seeking a continuance at that time, but I didn’t foresee the court granting a continuance the morning of trial based on that letter, and further when I couldn’t introduce it into evidence without the employer. And hence, when Mr. White showed me said letter the day of the trial, I was very surpr ised in that would have in fact changed how I would have tried the case and would have subpoenaed his employer to attend the trial to bring said letter into evidence. RP at 215. McClain further asserted a belief that the letter and th at Gino Streano’s

te stimony would have corrob orated White’s alibi. The trial court denied Jason White’s motion for a new trial. The court agreed that Gino Streano could have corroborated White’s story. Nonetheless, the trial court reasoned that, even with this potentially v erifying testimony, the jury would likely have convicted White based on Sergeant Todd Brightbill’s testimony and Sheriff Deputy David Hughes’ testimony of the Passat’s location fifty yards f rom White’s house. The trial court further observed that a cowork er could have been summoned to supply the same testimony as Streano.No. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

10 LAW AND ANALYSIS On appeal, Jason White challenges his conviction based on his second trial attorney’s purported ineffective assistance of counsel when failing to contact Gino
Streano and failing to summon Streano as a witness at trial in order to corroborate White’s alibi. White does not argue that his trial counsel performed deficiently by failing to request a trial continuance on December 18, 2017, when counsel first saw the letter from Streano. A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may be raised for the first time on appeal as an issue of constitutional magnitude. State v. Nichols , 161 Wn.2d 1, 9, 162 P.3d 1122 (2007). To demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel, a d efendant must make two showings. First, the defendant must show that defense counsel performed deficiently, i.e., that the performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness based on consideration of all circumstances. Second, a defendant mus t show that defense counsel’s representation prejudiced the defendant. This court need not address both prongs of the ineffective assistance test if the defendant fails to establish one prong. State v. Foster , 140 Wn. App. 266, 273, 166 P.3d 726 (2007). We rest o ur decision on Jason White’s failure to establish prejudice. Therefore, we do not decide whether second counsel’s performance fell below a standard
of reasonableness.No. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

11 The Washington Supreme Court, in the same breath, has announced facially
i nconsistent standards as to prejudice in the context of ineffective assistance of counsel. On the one hand, the accused must show “ a probability that the outcome would be different but for the attorney’s conduct.” State v. Jones , 183 Wn.2d 327, 339, 352 P.3d 776 (2015); State v. Benn , 120 Wn.2d 631, 663, 845 P.2d 289 (1993). Stated differently, prejudice means a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceedings would have been different. State v. McFarla nd , 127 Wn.2d 322, 334

- 35, 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). On the other hand, to show prejudice, the accused

“ need not prove that the outcome would have been different but must show only a

‘ reasonable probability ’

— by less than a more likely than not standard

— that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceedings would have been different. ”
State v. Jones , 183 Wn.2d at 339; State v. Hendrickson , 129 Wn.2d 61, 78, 917 P.2d 563 (1996) , overruled on other grounds by Carey v. Musladin , 549 U.S. 70, 127 S. Ct. 649, 166 L. Ed. 2d 482 (2006) . Regardless of the test utilized , Jason White does not establish reasonable probability of prejudice. We hold Jason White fails to show prejudice primarily because Gino Streano’s
letter does not confirm that White was present at the Beaverton worksite, rather than driving a car on Interstate 205, during the noon hour on March 3, 2016. Streano writes only that he scheduled White to work on March 3 and that White timely performed a job. Although Streano suggests th e Beaverton project took only one day, White testified theNo. 51460

- 5

- II

State v. White

12 undertaking lasted a week. Streano does not confirm those hours of the day, on March 3, during which White worked on the site. Perhaps Streano could provide percipient testimony of Jason White b eing present in Beaverton during the March 3 noon hour, but we cannot deduce such a conclusion based on the record. White may establish additional facts as to Streano’s personal knowledge of White’s whereabouts during a personal restraint petition.
CONC LUSION We affirm Jason White’s convictions for felony eluding a police officer and driving while license suspended. A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for pub lic record pursuant to RCW
2.06.040.

_________________________________ Fearing, J.
WE CONCUR:

______________________________ Melnick, J.

______________________________ Glasgow , J.