alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMISSORY NOTE
                                 ---------------

$50,000                                                   February 14, 2000



         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned WealthHound, Inc., a corporation
with its principal address at 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3120, Miami, Florida
33131 ("Maker") agrees to pay to the order of Ostonian Securities Limited, whose
address is Stanbrook House, 2-5 Old Bond Street, Suite 3C, 3rd Floor, London,
England W1X 3TB ("Holder"), the principal sum of Fifty Thousand and 00/100
($50,000.00) Dollars, with an interest rate of Ten Percent (10%) per annum, to
be paid in lawful money of the United States at the above address of Holder or
such other place as Holder may designate. The principal to be due and payable no
later than April 14, 2000.

         Maker hereby waives presentment, demand, notice, protest, and the
benefit of any homestead exemption law of any state and all other formalities in
connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance or enforcement of this
Note. Any failure by Holder to exercise any right hereunder shall not be
construed as a waiver of the right to exercise the same or any other right at
any other time or times. The waiver by Holder of a breach or default of any
provision of this of this Note shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of
any subsequent breach or default thereof.

         Upon the occurrence of any default under this Note, Holder shall
provide written notice to Maker of such default. If Maker fails to cure such
default within ten (10) days after receipt of Holder's notice, the entire unpaid
balance of this Note shall be immediately due and payable. At such time, Holder
may obtain a confession of judgement against Maker if allowable by law.

         Any principal or accrued interest may be prepaid without penalty or
premium at any time, in full or in part. Any prepayment of principal shall be
applied to principal installments in the inverse order in which such
installments are due and shall not postpone the due date of or the amount of,
any subsequent installments of principal.

         This Note shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of Maker,
Holder and their respective successors and assigns.

         This Note shall be construed and governed by the laws of the State of
Florida. The provisions of this Note are severable and the invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision shall not alter or impair the remaining
provisions of this Note.

         Maker hereby designates Holder as its attorney in fact to sign any and
all documents to effectuate the transactions hereunder.

ATTEST:                                     WEALTHHOUND, INC.



BY:                                         BY: /s/ Rebecca J. Brock
   ---------------------------                 --------------------------------
                                               Rebecca J. Brock, President
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DEONDRAE ANTHONY DANIELS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-1899

LT Case Nos. 2008-002103-CFAWS

2008-003904-CFAWS

2017-101848-CFDL

2018-306105-CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 14, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County, 

James R. Clayton, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and 

Robert Jackson Pearce, III, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, 

and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EISNAUGLE, TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
APPENDIX C
CONCORD FIRE DEPARTMENT
EMERGENCY CALLS
1970 - 1983
This list will be provided as soon as it is available. These records were manually recorded. The

Concord Fire Department building is currently undergoing renovation that has delayed recovery of these
records. We anticipate their availability by the end of September.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 150

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Marina Khalina and her son, Albert

Miftakhov.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 150 RFH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

2 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur3 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

4 1101 et seq.), Marina Khalina and her son, Albert

5 Miftakhov, shall be held and considered to have been law6 fully admitted to the United States for permanent resi7 dence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon

8 payment of the required visa fees.

9 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

10 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Marina

11 Khalina and her son, Albert Miftakhov, as provided in this

12 Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer

13 to reduce by the appropriate number during the current

14 fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available

15 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

16 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

17 1153(a)).

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 22), 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000

<CAPTION>
                  EXHIBIT 27 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Monarch
Services, Inc.'s unaudited financial statements for the period ended January 31,
2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
and the notes thereto.

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 Apr-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    May-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      Jan-31-2000
<CASH>                                                  8,502
<SECURITIES>                                               48
<RECEIVABLES>                                             397
<ALLOWANCES>                                               53
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        8,971
<PP&E>                                                    648
<DEPRECIATION>                                            437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          9,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   2,079
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  527
<OTHER-SE>                                              3,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            9,267
<SALES>                                                 3,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,625
<CGS>                                                   2,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           2,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         1,018
<INCOME-TAX>                                              346
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       672
<DISCONTINUED>                                           (230)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              442
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .27


</TABLE>
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  1993        1994        1995      1996        1997
                                                  ----        ----        ----      ----        ----
<S>                                              <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>         <C>
Income before taxes, extraordinary item and
  cumulative effect                             $ 5,830      $3,617     $ 3,677   $ 6,217     $ 1,632

Fixed Charges                                     5,385       5,984       8,616     8,124      11,165
                                                -------      ------      ------    ------     -------
Earnings                                        $11,215       9,601      12,293    14,341      12,797
                                                -------      ------      ------    ------     -------

Earnings to fixed charges                         2.08x       1.60x       1.43x     1.77x       1.15x
                                                =======      ======      ======    ======     =======

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 20-61223 Summary Calendar

Jose German Hernandez Zepeda,

Petitioner ,

versus
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General , Respondent

.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A205 877 458

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Jose German Hernandez-Zepeda, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the dismissa l by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of his appeal from the denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. Hernandez-Zepeda argues that the BIA erred by

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 28, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-61223 Document: 00516257180 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2022No. 20-61223

2 dismissing his appeal, contending that he established that he suffered past persecution and that he has a well-found ed fear of future persecution based on his membership in a particular social group compri sed of men who are believed to be in an adulterous relationship. We review the BIA’s legal conclusion s de novo and its factual findings for substantial evidence. Orellana-Monson v. Holder , 685 F.3d 511, 517-18 (5th Cir. 2012). “Under the substantial ev idence standard, reversal is improper unless we decide not only that the evid ence supports a co ntrary conclusion, but also that the evidence compels it.” Chen v. Gonzales , 470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotat ion marks and citation omitted).

Substantial evidence su pports the BIA’s decision that HernandezZepeda failed to show that he suffered past persecution. See id. The harm suffered by Hernandez-Zepeda, which cons isted of an altercation involving a single punch to the chest and the brandishing of a gun as well as numerous threats, does not rise to the level of past persecution. See Majd v. Gonzales , 446 F.3d 590, 596 (5th Cir. 2006); see also Thuri v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 788, 792-93 (5th Cir. 2004). Additiona lly, because the harm was motivated by purely personal reasons, substantial evid ence supports the BIA’s finding that he failed to establish a nexus between the harm and a protected ground. See Eduard v. Ashcroft , 379 F.3d 182, 190 (5th Cir. 2004). That finding was fatal to his asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Faddoul v. INS , 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994). Therefore, the BIA was not required to address the cognizability of Hernandez- Zepeda’s proposed part icular social group. See INS v. Bagamasbad , 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976). Because Hernandez-Zepeda failed to satisfy the asylum standard , he cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Gonzales-Veliz v. Barr , 938 F.3d 219, 224 (5th Cir. 2019). The petition for review is DENIED

. Case: 20-61223 Document: 00516257180 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2022
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

ELIZABETH A. WALKER n/k/a ) 

ELIZABETH W. LESKOVICH, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D17-287 

 ) 

DAVID J. WYRICK, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed October 20, 2017. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte 

County; Lisa S. Porter, Judge. 

Jeffrey A. Rapkin, Punta Gorda, for 

Appellant. 

No appearance for Appellee. 

MORRIS, Judge. 

 The former wife, Elizabeth Walker n/k/a Elizabeth Leskovich, appeals from 

a supplemental final judgment modifying parenting plan/timesharing. We affirm the 

modification of timesharing without further comment. We dismiss the portion of the 

appeal challenging the trial court's ability to modify child support as the trial court has 

not rendered a final order on that issue and it is therefore not yet ripe for our review. 
- 2 - 

 Affirmed in part; dismissed in part. 

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN, J., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 4, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10424]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Part 202

[Docket No. FR 5356-C-03]
RIN 2502-AI81


Federal Housing Administration: Continuation of FHA Reform--
Strengthening Risk Management Through Responsible FHA-Approved Lenders; 
Correction

AGENCY: Office of General Counsel, HUD.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD is correcting a final rule that appeared in the Federal 
Register of April 20, 2010 (75 FR 20718). This final rule adopted 
changes pertaining to the approval of mortgage lenders by the Federal 
Housing Administration (FHA) that are designed to strengthen FHA by 
improving its management of risk. Although the preamble to the final 
rule correctly provides that the revised net worth requirements will 
take effect for applicants to the FHA programs on May 20, 2010, the 
corresponding regulatory text incorrectly provides that the 
requirements will take effect on June 21, 2010. This document makes the 
necessary correction.

DATES: Effective Date: May 20, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Camille E. Acevedo, Associate General 
Counsel for Legislation and Regulations, Office of General Counsel, 
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 
10276, Washington, DC 20410-8000; telephone number 202-708-1793 (this 
is not a toll-free number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments 
may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal 
Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2010-8837 appearing on page 20718 
in the Federal Register of Tuesday, April 20, 2010, the following 
correction is made:


Sec.  202.5  [Corrected]

0
1. On page 20733, in the third column, in Sec.  202.5 General approval 
standards, in paragraph (n)(2)(i), ``Effective on June 21, 2010, 
applicants shall comply with the net worth requirements set forth in 
paragraphs (n)(2)(iii) of this section.'' is corrected to read 
``Effective on May 20, 2010, applicants shall comply with the net worth 
requirements set forth in paragraph (n)(2)(iii) of this section.''

    Dated: April 29, 2010.
Camille E. Acevedo,
Associate General Counsel for Legislation and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2010-10424 Filed 5-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Meta Platforms, Inc.

No. 06-24-00002-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Rambin, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice 

van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED JANUARY 16, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-509
In Re: MITCHELL ALFONSO KEY, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-93-1009-3-17AJ) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mitchell Alfonso Key, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Petitioner filed this petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have this court direct the district court to comply with this court's instructions to conduct a de novo review of Petitioner's objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation in Petitioner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action. In October 1995, the district court has entered an order in compliance with this court's order of remand. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny this mandamus petition as moot. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                [SLF LETTERHEAD]

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
 Med-Emerg International Inc.

We consent to the use of our audit report dated February 5, 1999 (except for
note15 for which the date is March 2, 1999) on the consolidated balance sheets
of Med-Emerg International Inc. as at December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
consolidated statements of operations and deficit and changes in financial
position for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 included herein.




/s/ Schwartz Levitsky Feldman

SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
May 17, 1999
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement No. 333-31536 of Monarch Services, Inc. on Form S-8 of
our report dated July 22, 1999, appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of Monarch Services, Inc. for the year ended April 30,
2000.



Deloitte & Touche LLP
Baltimore, Maryland

July 28, 2000
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     In connection with the Report of Prepaid Card Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bruce Berman, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that
to my knowledge:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     Date:     March 4, 2009
               -------------

     \s\ Bruce Berman
     ----------------
     Bruce Berman
     Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer























                                   PPDC3Q0949
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, Scott Sullinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation. This written statement is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to NeoMagic and will be retained by NeoMagic and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Date: April 6, 2006 

 

By: /s/ ScottSullinger            

Name: Scott Sullinger 

Title: Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New Jersey Mining
  Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004,
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer and Director of New
  Jersey Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

Date: March 29, 2005

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCH 
  Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer & Director



[The balance of this page has been intentionally left blank.]

---