25292 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 88 / Friday, May 7, 2010 / Notices 

publication of the notification reopening 

scoping on April 29, 2010, and this 

notification of postponed scoping will 

be held together with comments 

received during the initial scoping 

period of November 13, 2008 through 

January 13, 2009. No further comments 

are being solicited for scoping of the 

Lease Sale 220 EIS pending decision by 

the Secretary of the Interior. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information on the status for the Sale 

220 EIS scoping, please contact Mr. 

Gary D. Goeke, Chief, Environmental 

Assessment Section, Leasing and 

Environment (MS 5410), Minerals 

Management Service, Gulf of Mexico 

OCS Region, 1201 Elmwood Park 

Boulevard, New Orleans, LA 70123– 

2394, telephone (504) 736–3233. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With 

respect to proposed Lease Sale 220, 

MMS issued a Notice of Intent to 

prepare an EIS published in the Federal 

Register on November 13, 2008 (Vol. 73, 

No. 220, page 67201), and included a 

45-day scoping period. No scoping 

meetings were announced at that time. 

The MMS decided to extend the 

comment period and made 

announcements in a press release and 

other media. On January 7, 2009, MMS 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register (Vol. 74, No. 4, page 727) 

extending the scoping comment period 

to 60 days. That comment period 

expired on January 13, 2009. Scoping 

had been reopened in the Federal 

Register notice published on April 29, 

2010 (Vol. 75, No. 82, page 22623). 

Today’s notice postpones indefinitely 

scoping for the Sale 220 EIS until or 

unless MMS provides further 

notification. 

Dated: May 4, 2010. 

S. Elizabeth Birnbaum, 

Director, Minerals Management Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10981 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–689] 

In the Matter of Certain Dual Access 

Locks and Products Containing Same; 

Notice of Commission Determination 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Motions for Summary 

Determination of Non-Infringement and 

Finding No Violation of Section 337; 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

granting two motions for summary 

determination of non-infringement and 

no violation of section 337 issued by the 

presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) on March 18, 2010, in the abovecaptioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3041. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on October 21, 2009, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337, based on an amended 

complaint filed on October 5, 2009, by 

Safe Skies, LLC and David Tropp of 

Brooklyn, New York. 74 FR 54065 

(October 21, 2009). The Commission 

named the following companies as 

respondents: C&C Luggage 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of China; 

Formosa Tai Rank Industrial Corp. of 

Taiwan; Hangzhou Gema Suitcases & 

Bags Co., Ltd. of China; La Pearl 

Luggage and Leather Goods Co., Ltd. of 

China; Hinomoto Jomae, Ltd. of Japan; 

Sinox Company, Ltd. of Taiwan; Yi 

Feng Manufacturing, Co., Ltd. of China; 

Jin Tay Industries Co., Ltd. of Taiwan; 

FULLYEAR-Brother Enterprise, Co., Ltd. 

of Taiwan; Zhuhai SkyGood Tech. 

Industrial Corp., Ltd. of China; Ningbo 

Xianfeng Art & Craft Co., Ltd. of China; 

Paloma Enterprises Co., Ltd. of Taiwan; 

Tekraft Industrial Co., Ltd. of Taiwan; 

Hangzhou Travelsky Co., Ltd. of China; 

The Sun Lock Company Ltd. of Hong 

Kong; Alloy Metal Manufactory, Ltd. of 

Hong Kong; Cometform, Ltd. of England; 

Design Go Ltd. of England; Franzen 

International of Germany; M–Power 

Lock Manufactory of Hong Kong. 

The complaint alleged violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain dual access locks and products 

containing same that infringe claims 

1–21 of U.S. Patent No. 7,021,537 and 

claims 1–20 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,036,728. The complaint further 

alleged that an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337. The complainants 

requested that the Commission issue a 

general exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

On March 18, 2010, the ALJ issued an 

ID (Order No. 6) granting a motion of the 

Commission investigative attorney 

(‘‘IA’’) and a joint motion on behalf of 19 

of the above-named respondents for 

summary determination of noninfringement of all asserted claims. Only 

respondent Formosa Tai Ran Industrial 

Corp. did not join in the joint motion for 

summary determination. On April 1, 

2010, complainants filed a petition for 

review of the ID. On April 8, 2010, the 

IA filed an opposition to the petition for 

review. On April 9, 2010, the 19 

respondents filed a joint opposition to 

the petition for review and a motion for 

leave to file their response out of time, 

which the Commission has granted. 

Having examined the record in this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s ID, 

the petition for review and the 

responses thereto, the Commission has 

determined not to review the ID and 

terminate the investigation with a 

finding of no violation of section 337. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.42–.46 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42–.46). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 3, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10758 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OMB Number 1121–0166] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Extension of a Currently 

Approved Collection: Comments 

Requested 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of information 

collection under review: Extension of a 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES