alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF RENAISSANCE LEARNING, INC.
                              (As of March 1, 2007)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                                Jurisdiction of Organization
----                                                ----------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
AlphaSmart Direct, Inc.                             Wisconsin
Advantage Learning Systems India Private Limited    India
Renaissance Learning of Canada Co.                  Nova Scotia, Canada
Renaissance Learning UK Limited                     United Kingdom
RL Investments, Inc.                                Nevada
RL Asset Management, Inc.                           Nevada
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I, Mark
Alsentzer, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Pure Earth,
Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [Intentionally Omitted]for
the registrant and have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)           [Intentionally
Omitted];




(c)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(d)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:      
      November
      17, 2009
                /s/
      Mark AlsentzerMark
      AlsentzerPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1520

To amend the U.S. Holocaust Assets Commission Act of 1998 to extend

the period by which the final report is due and to authorize additional

funding.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 5, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. GRAMS, and Mr. DODD)

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the U.S. Holocaust Assets Commission Act of

1998 to extend the period by which the final report

is due and to authorize additional funding.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Holocaust Assets

5 Commission Extension Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE U.S. HOLOCAUST ASSETS

7 COMMISSION ACT OF 1998.

8 (a) EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FINAL REPORT.—Sec9 tion 3(d)(1) of the U.S. Holocaust Assets Commission Act
2

S 1520 IS

1 of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 1621 nt.) is amended by striking ‘‘De2 cember 31, 1999’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December

3 31, 2000’’.

4 (b) REAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Sec5 tion 9 of the U.S. Holocaust Assets Commission Act of

6 1998 (22 U.S.C. 1621 nt.) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘3,500,000’’ and inserting in

8 lieu thereof ‘‘$6,000,000’’; and

9 (2) by striking ‘‘1999, and 2000,’’ and insert10 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘1999, 2000, and 2001,’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2064

ORETHA STEPP, Surviving spouse (divorced) of

Harold Willis,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

LABOR; UNITED STATES STEEL MINING COMPANY,

INCORPORATED,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

96-0210-BLA)

Submitted: April 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oretha Stepp, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Jill M. Otte,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Howard Gerald

Salisbury, Jr., KAY, CASTO, CHANEY, LOVE & WISE, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1997). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Stepp v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 96-0219-BLA

(B.R.B. June 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3075 EARL T. BARNETT

Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

PH315H080391-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER Earl T. Barnett moves for an extension of time to file his brief. The court considers whether to vacate its March 10, 2009 order dismissing Barnett's petition for review for failure to file a brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion for an extension of time is granted. The March 10 dismissal order will be vacated, the mandate will be recalled, and the petition for review will be reinstated if Barnett files his brief within 30 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 

# MAR 2 0 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly 

### FILED Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR CC: Earl T. Bennett THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Bernard E. Doyle, Esq. s17 MAR 2 0 2009 JAN ii0RtiALY CLERK
**Exhibit 15.5**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM****

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-108817, 333-84710, 333-44548, 333-60150, 333-120564, 333-127850,333-136551 and 333-161639) of UTStarcom Holdings Corp. of our report dated June 30, 2015 relating to the consolidated financialstatements of iTV Media Inc., which appears in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F of UTStarcom Holdings Corp.

 

 

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP

 

Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China

June 30, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for Valley National Gases Incorporated and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001030715
<NAME> VALLEY NATIONAL GASES INCORPORATED

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         769,564
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,718,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   586,698
<INVENTORY>                                 13,748,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,569,495
<PP&E>                                      87,123,146
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,901,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             131,943,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,301,889
<BONDS>                                     68,818,457
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,620
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,644,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               131,943,292
<SALES>                                    126,080,048
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           126,080,048
<CGS>                                       61,547,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,547,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            53,269,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,333,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,445,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,836,167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,609,668
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,609,668
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated February 24,2005 (except for Note 2 as to which the date is August 24, 2005 and Note 3as to which the date is January 10, 2006), accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements and related financial schedule included in the AnnualReport of WorldGate Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the yearended December 31, 2004. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph thatstates that Worldgate Communications, Inc. has suffered recurring lossesfrom operations and has a net accumulated deficiency of $218 million thatraises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Thefinancial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from theoutcome of that uncertainty. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said report in the Registration Statements of WorldGateCommunications, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-78943, effective May 20,1999; 333-49612, effective November 9, 2000; 333-58346, effective April 5,2001; and 333-62810, effective June 12, 2001).

 

 
| /s/ Grant Thornton LLP |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Philadelphia, PA       |
| March 29, 2006    |

 

----
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6
VIRGINIA ANN LEHMAN , 7 Petitioner-Appellee, 8
v. NO. 30,605 9 KELLY SCOTT LEHMAN, 10 Respondent-Appellant, 11 In the Matter of the ESTATE 12 OF THEODORE H. LEHMAN, 13 deceased. 14
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY 15 William A. Sanchez, District Judge 16 Norman McDonald, PA 17 Norman McDonald 18 Belen, NM 19 for Appellee 20 Kelly Scott Lehman 21 Albuquerque, NM 22 Pro Se Appellant 232 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 KENNEDY, Judge. 2 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 3 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 4 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 5 DISMISSED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7

_______________________________ 8 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 9
WE CONCUR: 10

___________________________ 11 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 12

___________________________ 13 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 14
Exhibit 32

Sonic Foundry, Inc.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

For the Year Ended September 30, 2008

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Statement

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18
U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Sonic Foundry, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on our
knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 5, 2008



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Rimas P. Buinevicius
|By:    |  | Rimas P. Buinevicius    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Kenneth A. Minor    
|By:    |  | Kenneth A. Minor        
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer 



72
463 A.2d 26

#### Commonwealth v. Katzin, Appellant.

Submitted May 10, 1982.

Andrew G. Gay, for appel*622lant; Jane Cutler Greenspan, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CAVANAUGH, CIRILLO and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Affirmed.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Anthony Sylvester, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Phyllis Chu, J.), rendered June 27, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the second degree and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Phyllis Chu, J.), rendered June 27, 2017, affirmed. </p><p>Our review of the record indicates that defendant's guilty plea was entered knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily with the aid of counsel, and after the court sufficiently advised defendant of the constitutional rights he would be giving up by pleading guilty (<i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375 [2015]; <i>People v Sougou</i>, 26 NY3d 1052 [2015]). Contrary to defendant's present contention, nothing in the plea allocution record negated any element of the criminal contempt charge to which he pleaded or referred to any viable defense (<a href="../2018/2018_03601.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Roberson</i>, 161 AD3d 544</a> [2018], <i>lv denied</i> 32 NY3d 940 [2018]), and the court was not required to make a sua sponte inquiry concerning statements defendant made on other occasions (<a href="../2004/2004_02485.htm" target="_blank"><i>see e.g. People v Fiallo</i>, 6 AD3d 176</a>, 177 [2004], <i>lv denied </i>3 NY3d 640 [2004]; <a href="../2016/2016_02572.htm" target="_blank"><i>see also People v Velez</i>, 138 AD3d 418</a> [2016], <i>lv denied</i> 27 NY3d 1140 [2016]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: February 25, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 11.1
                                           Computation of Loss Per Share



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                       Period from
                                                        Years Ended                                     July 1, 1994
                                   ------------------------------------------------------             (commencement)
                                        December 31,                  December 31,                       through
                                            1999                           1998                      December 31, 1999
                                   -----------------------      -------------------------      ---------------------------
<S>                                        <C>                           <C>                              <C>
Loss for the period                        $     1,766,517               $      3,389,208                 $     12,243,192
                                   =======================      =========================      ===========================
Shares used in computing
loss per share:

    Weighted average shares
    outstanding (Note 1)                        20,545,737                     20,056,945                       14,686,139
                                   =======================      =========================      ===========================
Loss per share                                        0.09               $           0.17                 $           0.83
                                   =======================      =========================      ===========================
</TABLE>

Note 1:   Due to  the  net  losses  incurred  during  each  of  the  periods
          presented,  common share  equivalents are  anti-dilutive and have been
          excluded from the computation.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24772-24773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10548]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6598]


U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Notice of Meeting

    The 2010 Annual Meeting of the U.S. National Commission for the 
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization 
(UNESCO) will take place on Wednesday, May 26, 2010 and Thursday, May 
27, 2010, at the Embassy Suites in Washington, DC (900 10th Street, 
NW.). On Wednesday, May 26 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and from 2 p.m. to 
approximately 6:30 p.m., the Commission will hold a series of

[[Page 24773]]

informational plenary sessions and subject-specific committee and 
thematic breakout sessions, which will be open to the public. 
Additionally, on Thursday, May 27, the Commission will meet from 9 a.m. 
until approximately 1 p.m. to discuss final recommendations, which also 
will be open to the public. Members of the public who wish to attend 
any of these meetings or who need reasonable accommodation should 
contact the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO no later than 
Wednesday, May 19th for further information about admission, as seating 
is limited. Those who wish to make oral comments during the public 
comment section held during the concluding session Tuesday should 
request to be scheduled by Thursday, May 20th. Each individual will be 
limited to five minutes, with the total oral comment period not 
exceeding thirty minutes. Written comments should be submitted by 
Tuesday, May 18th to allow time for distribution to the Commission 
members prior to the meeting. The National Commission may be contacted 
via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b7f786e757e6878747b484f5a4f5e155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37737462797264747877444356435219505841">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (202) 663-0026.

    Dated: April 28, 2010.
Elizabeth Kanick,
Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-10548 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
*After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted September 26, 2007 * Decided October 4, 2007 Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge No. 06-2747 EDWARD ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 01 CR 169-1 William T. Hart, Judge

. O R D E R After robbing three banks (one of them, twice) in Chicago and Oak Park, Illinois, Edward Allen was found guilty of two counts of bank robbery in the federal courts. See 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The district court sentenced him to a total of 264 months’ imprisonment. More than four years after the entry of judgment, Allen filed what he styled as a motion to vacate the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). He claimed that his guilty pleas were involuntary because neither the prosecutor nor his own counsel told him about the Statutes at Large—a failure NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 06-2747 Page 2 that, according to Allen, prevented him from understanding the robbery charges. The district court summarily denied the motion, and Allen appeals. Allen’s motion presents a claim for relief that is substantively within the scope of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ¶ 1, and so the government argues that the submission is a motion under § 2255 and that we should dismiss this appeal because Allen did not obtain a certificate of appealability. See, e.g. , United States v. Carraway , 478 F.3d 845, 849 (7th Cir. 2007); Melton v. United States , 359 F.3d 855, 857 (7th Cir. 2004). The district court did not say what characterization it gave the motion, though the absence of any warning to Allen suggests that the court rejected the reading now urged by the government. See United States v. Castro , 540 U.S. 375, 383 (2003); Melton , 359 F.3d at 857. In any event, Allen’s submission is frivolous, and in this court he concedes that “the district court had no grounds to grant the motion.” Allen offers a different claim here—that his trial lawyer failed to file a notice of appeal as directed—and whereas that contenti on is not raised in Allen’s motion it is thus waived. See Estremera v. United States , 442 F.3d 580, 587 (7th Cir. 2006). AFFIRMED.