alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1652 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1652

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Old Executive Office Building located at 17th Street 
 and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in Washington, District of Columbia, as 
          the Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive Office Building.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER EXECUTIVE OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    The Old Executive Office Building located at 17th Street and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in Washington, District of Columbia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive 
Office Building.

            Passed the Senate October 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1652

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Old Executive Office Building located at 17th Street 
 and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in Washington, District of Columbia, as 
          the Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive Office Building.
```
Exhibit 10.8


 


PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION






FIRST AMENDMENT TO


RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT AGREEMENT

(Non-Assignable)


 


This First Amendment
to Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (this “Amendment”) is dated as of December 10, 2015, by and between Debra
Struhsacker (“Holder”) and Pershing Gold Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Corporation”).


 


A.           On
December 11, 2014, Holder and the Corporation entered into that certain Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”)
pursuant to which Holder was granted Fourteen Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Four (14,724) restricted shares (originally 265,000
shares on a pre-split basis) (the “Shares”) of the Corporation’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.


 


B.           The Corporation
and Holder have agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.          Amendment
to Restricted Stock Grant Agreement. The Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 2 thereof and replacing it with the
following:


 


2.          Vesting
and Forfeiture. Participant shall vest in his or her rights under the Restricted Stock pursuant to the following schedule (each
date upon which vesting occurs being referred to herein as a “Vesting Date”):


 


	Date	 	Number of

 Shares Vested	 
	March 14, 2016	 	 	4,908	 
	December 11, 2016	 	 	4,908	 
	December 11, 2017	 	 	4,908	 



 





The foregoing notwithstanding,
vesting pursuant to the foregoing schedule shall occur on a Vesting Date only if Participant remains employed by or provides services
to the Corporation from the Date of Grant to such Vesting Date. If Participant ceases to be employed by or ceases to provide services
to the Corporation at any time prior to the final Vesting Date, pursuant to Section 6.1.3 of the Plan, all unvested Restricted
Stock shall be forfeited immediately on the date that Participant’s employment or service is terminated and the Participant
shall have no further rights with respect to such Restricted Stock.


 


2.          No
Other Changes. Except for the amendment contained in Section 1 hereof, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall
continue in full force and effect without any further amendments or changes.


 




    1 


     


    

 


3.          Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts each of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


4.          Governing
Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of
Nevada without reference to principles of conflicts of laws.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 




    2 


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.


 


	 	HOLDER:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Debra Struhsacker
	 	Debra Struhsacker
	 	 
	 	PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Eric Alexander
	 	Name: Eric Alexander
	 	Title: Vice President of Finance and Controller


 




    3
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT 2002**

 

This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report of UTStarcom Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2014, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A filed on the date hereof (the “Report”).

 

In connection with the Report, I, William Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: June 30, 2014

 
| By:    | /s/   William Wong                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:   William Wong               |   |
|   | Title:   *Chief Executive Officer* |   |

 

----
Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Minera Andes Inc. (the Corporation), on Form 40-F for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, William V. Schara, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                   |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | MINERA ANDES INC.
|                     |  |                  
|Date: April 27, 2007 |  | By:               |  | /s/ William V. Schara  
|                     |  |                   |  | William V. Schara      
|                     |  |                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a- 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Minera Andes, Inc. and will be retained by Minera Andes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
BARCELON INVESTMENTS LTD.

                                              c/o Clayton Been, Director/Manager
                                                           c/o Misick & Sanbrook
                                                    Richmond House, P.O. Box 127
                                                  Providenciales, Turks & Caicos
                                                             British West Indies


June 1st, 2000

LazyGrocer.com Corp.
41 York Street, 3rd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario Canada
K1N 5S0

                    CONTRACT FOR INTERNATIONAL REPRESENTATION

     WHEREAS LAZYGROCER.COM  (hereafter GROCER) wishes to engage the services of
BARCELON  INVESTMENTS  LTD.  (hereafter  BARCELON)  to  represent  GROCER in the
International market and to raise money from entities and individuals outside of
the United States and Canada, and

     WHEREAS, BARCELON, whishes to provide the above listed services for GROCER,

     NOW THEREFORE,  in return for Ten Dollars (USD) and other good and valuable
consideration, in hand paid to each acknowledged by each,

     THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

A.                BARCELON  will  actively  represent the interests of GROCER in
                  all  Countries  outside  the United  States and  Canada.  Said
                  representation will include,  but not be limited to, marketing
                  both GROCER's  products as well as GROCER's  equity.  BARCELON
                  shall be responsible  for promoting  GROCER by use of websites
                  and media in nations  outside of the U.S.  and Canada and with
                  seeking to raise  money by  promotion  of  GROCER's  equity to
                  individuals who are nationals of countries other than the U.S.
                  and Canada.

B.                For its part,  GROCER will  compensate  BARCELON by payment of
                  887,559  shares of GROCER's  free trading  common shares which
                  are to be issued upon  execution of this  Contract.  The above
                  compensation  is  understood  by  all  parties  to  constitute
                  complete  payment  for  BARCELON's  services  for the  initial
                  contract period.

C.                These  Parties both  understand  and agree that this  contract
                  shall  remain in effect  for 24 months or until  cancelled  in
                  writing by both  parties or for cause by either  party.  Cause
                  shall be determined  as a material  breech of this contract by
                  either party.

D.                The  parties  agree that any  dispute  between the parties and
                  resulting  from breech of the terms of this contract  shall be
                  litigated in the Circuit Court of Orange  County,  Florida and
                  decided pursuant to Florida law.


                  ENTERED INTO THIS 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2000





                   LAZYGROCER.COM CORP.


                   By
                     BARCELON INVESTMENT LTD.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129446 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129446 

 COA: 261285 

Genesee CC: 02-010264-FH 

MATTHEW KEITH PARKINSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

p1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00050

- CV

IN RE ISABEL MIRIAM BLANES RUIZ RELATOR

----------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TRIAL COURT NO. 067

- 294263

- 17

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

----------
The court has considered rel ator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of
the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and KERR, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 15, 2018

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                    |                  |                                            |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| DATE:  August 13,      2010    | BY:    | /s/ Larry W. Myers                              |   |
|                                                    |                  | Larry      W. Myers                             |   |
|                                                    |                  | President      and Chief Executive      Officer |   |
|                                                    |                  |                                            |   |

----
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Qele
Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Deborah
Appana, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date: 
October 27, 2008








DEBORAH APPANA Deborah
Appana


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director











-1-
291 P.2d 1119

#### Earl F. CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. J. M. JENSEN, doing business as Jensen Motor Sales, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8263.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Dec. 20, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1956.

Richards, Haga & Eberle, Boise, for appellant.

Givens, O’Leary, Doane & Givens, Boise, for respondent.

PORTER, Justice.

By virtue and under the authority of the decision filed this day in the case of Jensen v. Chandler, *77*Idaho 303, 291 P.2d 1116, the judgment of the trial court in favor of respondent in this action is affirmed, Costs to respondent.

TAYLOR, C. J., and KEETON, ANDERSON and SMITH, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                  CALCULATION OF PRIMARY NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Year                    Year                   Year
                                                   Ended                   Ended                  Ended
                                               June 30, 1995           June 30, 1996          June 30, 1997   
                                             -----------------       -----------------     -------------------
<S>                                                <C>                     <C>                   <C>
Net income                                         $3,554,964              $4,100,928             $  (844,897)
Pro forma income taxes                              1,421,986               1,640,371               1,430,302 
                                             -----------------       -----------------     -------------------
Pro forma net income                               $2,132,978              $2,460,557             $(2,275,199)

Weighted average shares
  outstanding during the period                     7,000,000               7,000,000               7,570,234

Shares issuable under
  consulting agreement                                 96,366                  96,366

Shares issuable under
  compensation agreement                              170,708                 170,708

Shares assumed outstanding to support S
Corporation distribution                                   --                      --                 930,407 
                                             -----------------       -----------------     -------------------
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares outstanding during the
period                                              7,267,074               7,267,074               8,500,641 
                                             =================       =================     ===================
Pro forma net income per
  share                                                 $0.29                   $0.34                  $(0.27) 
                                             =================       =================     ===================
</TABLE>
Opinion filed June 5, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-15-00017-CR

___________

RAQUEL MCDONALD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 42nd District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 25166A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Raquel McDonald, Appellant, has filed a motion to withdraw her appeal. In 

the motion, Appellant requests that this court withdraw her notice of appeal and 

“dismiss this appeal.” The motion is signed by both Appellant and her counsel in 

accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

June 5, 2015 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1513

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Jacqueline Salinas and her children Gabriela

Salinas, Alejandro Salinas, and Omar Salinas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1513 RFH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

2 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur3 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

4 1101 et seq.), Jacqueline Salinas and her children

5 Gabriela Salinas, Alejandro Salinas, and Omar Salinas,

6 shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admit7 ted to the United States for permanent residence as of

8 the date of enactment of this Act upon payment of the

9 required visa fees.

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF VISAS.

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Jac12 queline Salinas and her children Gabriela Salinas,

13 Alejandro Salinas, and Omar Salinas, as provided in this

14 Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer

15 to reduce by the appropriate number during the current

16 fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available

17 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

18 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

19 1153(a)).

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 22), 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5719 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to revise certain measures 

used under the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers 

and Systems survey relating to pain management. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2018 

Mrs. BLACK (for herself and Mr. O’HALLERAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to revise 

certain measures used under the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey 

relating to pain management. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reduce Overpre5 scribing Opioids in Treatment Act of 2018’’ or the 

6 ‘‘ROOT Act of 2018’’. 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5719 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISING MEASURES USED UNDER THE HOSPITAL 

2 CONSUMER ASSESSMENT OF HEALTHCARE 

3 PROVIDERS AND SYSTEMS SURVEY RELAT4 ING TO PAIN MANAGEMENT. 

5 Section 1886(b)(3)(B)(viii) of the Social Security Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(viii)) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following new subclause: 

8 ‘‘(XII) With respect to the Hospital Consumer As9 sessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey (or 

10 a successor survey), beginning not later than January 1, 

11 2020, such survey may not include questions about com12 munication by hospital staff with an individual about such 

13 individual’s pain unless such questions take into account, 

14 as applicable, whether an individual experiencing pain was 

15 informed about risks associated with the use of opioids 

16 and about non-opioid alternatives for the treatment of 

17 pain.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xun Energy Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the period ended November 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:   April 15, 2013



By: /s/ Jerry G. Mikolajczyk

Jerry G. Mikolajczyk,

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)