alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5814 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5814

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
   for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2018

  Mr. Brown of Maryland (for himself, Ms. Barragan, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. 
   Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Carson of 
    Indiana, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Correa, Mr. 
 Courtney, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Hanabusa, Mr. 
  Hastings, Ms. Norton, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. 
  Kaptur, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Langevin, Ms. Lee, Mr. Sean Patrick 
 Maloney of New York, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Meeks, 
Ms. Moore, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. 
 Thompson of Mississippi, Ms. Titus, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Vargas, Mr. Vela, 
 Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Ms. Eshoo, 
and Mr. Pocan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
   for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Educators Expense Deduction 
Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND 
              SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 62(a)(2)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$250'' and inserting ``$500''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 62(d)(3) of such Code is amended 
to read as follows:
            ``(3) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning after 2019, the $500 amount in subsection 
        (a)(2)(D) shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2018' for `calendar year 2016' in 
                subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to taxable years beginning December 31, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Teen Glow Makeup, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pamela Hutchinson, the President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify            pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: | August 6, 2008 | **TEEN GLOW MAKEUP, INC.** |
|-------|----------------|----------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Pamela Hutchinson |
|--------|-----------------------|

Pamela Hutchinson, President,

Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                              75
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                       492
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,104
<PP&E>                                         127,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,264
<BONDS>                                         38,788
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,717
<SALES>                                         47,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,210
<CGS>                                           38,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    11
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,216)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned, Dongliang Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA POLYPEPTIDE
GROUP, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:




1. The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended March 31, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this17th day of
May, 2010.




/s/
      Dongliang ChenDongliang
      ChenChief
      Executive Officer
                  (Principal Executive
      Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Polypeptide Group, Inc. and will be retained by China Polypeptide Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1602

To require the closure of Naval Station Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico upon

termination of Armed Forces use of training ranges on the island of

Vieques, Puerto Rico, involving live munitions impact.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 21, 1999

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To require the closure of Naval Station Roosevelt Roads,

Puerto Rico upon termination of Armed Forces use of

training ranges on the island of Vieques, Puerto Rico,

involving live munitions impact.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLOSURE OF NAVAL STATION ROOSEVELT

4 ROADS, PUERTO RICO.

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find6 ings:
2

•S 1602 IS

1 (1) The principal mission of Naval Station Roo2 sevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, is to support the Atlantic

3 Fleet Weapons Training Facility.

4 (2) The key component of the Atlantic Fleet

5 Weapons Training Facility is the set of training

6 ranges on the island of Vieques, including the live

7 impact area on the eastern tip of the island.

8 (3) The other missions of Naval Station Roo9 sevelt Roads, such as the performance of counter10 drug operations by P–3 aircraft and the missions of

11 the Special Operations Command, South, can be

12 performed at other military facilities outside of

13 Puerto Rico.

14 (4) Military training operations, including the

15 expenditure of live munitions, take place at a num16 ber of facilities in the continental United States and

17 in Allied nations.

18 (5) If access to training ranges such as those

19 on the island of Vieques are terminated, the value of

20 the Puerto Rican Operating Area and the require21 ments for maintaining Naval Station Roosevelt

22 Roads are greatly diminished.

23 (6) The Department of Defense must leverage

24 its resources in the most cost-effective manner to en-
3

•S 1602 IS

1 sure that it maximizes its ability to train its military

2 forces.

3 (7) Maintaining Naval Station Roosevelt Roads

4 without access to training ranges, including those on

5 the island of Vieques, would not be the most effi6 cient use of scarce readiness resources.

7 (b) CONTINGENT REQUIREMENT FOR CLOSURE.—

8 Upon any termination of use of the training ranges on

9 the island of Vieques for live munitions impact involved

10 in the training of the Armed Forces, the Secretary of De11 fense shall transfer the missions, personnel, and assets of

12 Naval Station Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, to the conti13 nental United States and close Naval Station Roosevelt

14 Roads. The Secretary may, however, transfer any counter15 drug mission, together with associated personnel and as16 sets, to a forward operation location outside the conti17 nental United States that is also outside the Common18 wealth of Puerto Rico.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-6825 JERRY LEE WATSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-143, CA-96-3243-6-20AK) Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: June 24, 1998 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELJerry Lee Watson, Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Jerry Lee Watson pled guilty to distribution of cocaine base. He did not file a direct appeal. In his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion filed in the district court he alleged that: (1) the district court erred by enhancing his sentence for crack cocainebecause he only pled guilty to cocaine base; (2) he received ineffective assistance because his c ounsel failed to object to his sentencing for crack; and (3) his attorney was ineffective for failing to file anotice of appeal as requested. The district court granted the Government's motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims. Watson appeals. On appeal the Government has filed a motion to remand because the district court failed to conduct an evidentiary hearing into whether Watson actually requested that his attorney file a notice of appeal. Rather, the district court, on the basis of competing affidavits alone, made a factual finding that Watson did not request that his attorney file a notice of appeal. As noted by the Government in its motion to remand, this was error. See United States v. Peak , 992 F.2d 39, 42 (4th Cir. 1993) ("[A] criminal defense attorney's failure to file a notice of appeal when requested by his client deprives the defendantof his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel, notwithstanding that the lost appeal may not have had a reasonable probability of success."); Becton v. Barnett , 920 F.2d 1190, 1192 (4th Cir. 1990) (holding that in a habeas pro ceeding where material facts are in dispute, a federal court must hold an evidentiary hearing unless facts were resolved in a prior state hearing).Accordingly we grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court's order, grant the Government's motion to remand, and direct the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing consistent with this opinion. We express no opinion regarding the propriety of Watson's other two claims. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                           2,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,403
<PP&E>                                          13,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,507
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,133
<SALES>                                         91,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,834
<CGS>                                           47,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,819
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                       118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24571-24572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1676]


Designation of New Grantee

Foreign-Trade Zone 243, Victorville, California

Resolution and Order

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-

[[Page 24572]]

Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered the 
application (filed 03/17/2010) submitted by the Southern California 
Logistics Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 243, requesting reissuance 
of the grant of authority for said zone to the City of Victorville, 
which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ 
Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements of the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is 
in the public interest.
    Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the 
City of Victorville as the new grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 243, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.28. The Secretary of Commerce, as Chairman of the Board, is hereby 
authorized to issue an appropriate Board Order.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20\th\ day of April 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import AdministrationAlternate 
ChairmanForeign-Trade Zones Board.
    ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10621 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40689 **consolidated with No. 21** 

**- 40706**  Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Jose Luis Trevino**

**- Gomez,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:21

- CR

- 339

- 1 USDC No. 2:16

- CR

- 813

- 1

Before **Davis, Jones,** and **Elrod,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Trevino

- Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 6, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40689 Document: 00516269985 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2022No. 21

- 40689 c/w No. 21

- 40706

2 accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Trevino

- Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal s present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from furth er responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL S**  **ARE DISMISSED** 

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-40689 Document: 00516269985 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2022
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-78943,
333-49612, 333-58346 and 333-62810) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-35936, 333-42526 and
333-62888) of our report, which contains explanatory paragraphs stating that substantial doubt exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and that the Company
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," on January 1, 2002, dated February 14, 2003 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule of WorldGate Communications, Inc., which appear in WorldGate Communications, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.

PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
March 28, 2003

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 99.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monarch Services, Inc. Receives Notice of Delisting from the Nasdaq Stock
Market

BALTIMORE, MARYLAND - AUGUST 5, 2005 - Monarch Services, Inc. (NasdaqSC:MAHI)
(the "Company") today announced that it received notice from the staff of the
Nasdaq Stock Market Listing Qualifications Department that the staff had
determined that the Company's securities will be delisted from The Nasdaq
SmallCap Market at the opening of business on August 10, 2005. The Company
does not currently plan to appeal the staff's determination.

The staff's determination, communicated by letter dated August 1, 2005, is a
result of the Company's inability to certify its compliance with certain Nasdaq
corporate governance requirements.  In particular, the Company was not able to
certify its compliance with Nasdaq Marketplace Rules 4350(c)(1) (requiring
listed companies to have a board of directors with a majority of independent
directors) and 4350(d)(2) (requiring listed companies to have an audit committee
of at least three members, each of whom must be independent).

Contact:

Jackson Y. Dott
Monarch Services, Inc.
4517 Harford Road
Baltimore, Maryland 21214
(410) 254-9200
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

### **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-78943, 333-49612, 333-58346 and 333-62810) of our report dated February 14,2003, except as to the discontinued operations described in Note 18 as to whichthe date is March 21, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedule of WorldGate Communications, Inc., which appears in thisForm 10-K/A.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
| Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania     |
| August 25,  2005                |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wi-Max Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank R. Ventura, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 23, 2011
 
 
 By: /s/ Frank R. Ventura
 Frank R. Ventura
 Chief Financial Officer