alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Annual Report

Pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned
officer of Renaissance Learning, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that,
to the undersigneds knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the
 Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (2) | the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                    

|                     |                                                                              | 
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: March 6, 2009 |                                                                              | 
|                     | /s/ Mary T.
 Minch                                                          
|                     | Name: Mary
 T. Minch                                                        
|                     | Title:
 Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

THIS WRITTEN
STATEMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF
THE SECURITES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

---
463 A.2d 33

#### Commonwealth v. Seshens, Appellant.

Submitted April 28, 1983.

H. Spirt, for appellant; Joseph A. Smyth, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

*634Before ROWLEY, WIEAND and POPOVICH, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           2,021
<SECURITIES>                                    25,615
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,887
<INVENTORY>                                     41,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,204
<PP&E>                                         266,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 465,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,144
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,528
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   465,143
<SALES>                                        729,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               729,238
<CGS>                                          639,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  698,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,407)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,102
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,436
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,666
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Triangle  Alternative Network
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on or about  the  date
hereof (the "Report"),  I,  Lyle  J  Mortensen,  Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents,  in  all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 21, 2010
/s/ Lyle J. Mortensen

By: Lyle J. Mortensen
Its: Chief Executive Officer
No. DA 19-0317

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KRISTOFER BUTLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion and good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an 

extension of time to and including August 8, 2020, within which to 

prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 8 2020

07/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0317
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TouchIT Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) I, Andrew Brabin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  November 17, 2010
By:
/s/ Andrew BrabinName: Andrew BrabinTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 165

To require the Secretary of Education to correct poverty data to account

for cost of living differences.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Education to correct poverty

data to account for cost of living differences.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. POVERTY DATA.

4 Title XIV of the Elementary and Secondary Edu5 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 8801 et seq.) is amended

6 by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘PART I—POVERTY DATA ADJUSTMENTS

8 ‘‘SEC. 14901. POVERTY DATA ADJUSTMENTS.

9 ‘‘Whenever the Secretary uses any data that relates

10 to the incidence of poverty and is produced or published
2

•S 165 IS

1 by or for the Secretary of Commerce for subnational,

2 State or substate areas, the Secretary shall adjust the

3 data to account for differences in the cost of living in the

4 areas.’’.

5 SEC. 2. SHORT TITLE.

6 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Education Grant For7 mula Adjustment Act of 1999’’.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 6, 2011 

jam 

Order 

 

January 6, 2011 

141920 

LONNER MELTON, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141920 

 CoA: 297601 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of October 19, 2010, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file.
Exhibit 23.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatements No. 333-56829, No. 333-89465, and No. 333-108119 on Form S-8, and Registration Statements No. 333-90321, No. 333-32756, No. 333-47600 and No. 333-113930 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 10,2006, relating to the financial statements of CuraGen Corporation and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CuraGen Corporation for the year endedDecember 31, 2005. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Stamford, Connecticut 

March 10, 2006
Exhibit 15.1  GRAPHICKPMG LLP
Telephone
(416)   228-7000Yonge   Corporate Centre
Fax
(416)   228-71234100   Yonge St.
Internet
www.kpmg.caSuite 200North   York, ON M2P 2H3  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors Celestica Inc.  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113591, 333-88210, 333-71126, 333-66726, 333-63112) and Form F-3ASR (No. 333-199616) of Celestica Inc. of our report dated March 5, 2015, on the consolidated financial statements of Celestica Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, and our audit report dated March 5, 2015 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the annual report on Form 20-F of Celestica Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.  GRAPHIC    Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants March 13, 2015 Toronto, Canada  KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3068

DARRELL GAVIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SPRING RIDGE CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED;

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PEOPLE, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-1034

DARRELL GAVIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SPRING RIDGE CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED;

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PEOPLE, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-2668-S)
2

Argued: July 9, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Scott Craig Borison, LEGG LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Frederick,

Maryland, for Appellant. Kathleen Pontone, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE,

P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Thomas E.

Lynch, III, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C., Frederick, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 The appellees' motions to dismiss the appeal as moot and for

attorney's fees are denied.

2 Our decision obviates the need to rule on Gavin's appeal of

the district court's October 23, 1995, order denying a preliminary

injunction.

3

PER CURIAM:

Darrell Gavin appeals the summary judgment granted to Spring

Ridge Conservancy, Inc., and Property Management People, Inc., in

Gavin's action claiming violations of his rights under the Fair

Housing Act Amendments of 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. Our

review of the record, the district court's memorandum opinion, and

the arguments of counsel discloses that this appeal is without

merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court.1 Gavin v. Spring Ridge Conservancy, Inc., Civil Action

No. S-95-2668 (D. Md. Dec. 11, 1995) (Memorandum Opinion). 2

AFFIRMED
(February 3, 1898.)

#### DUNNIWAY v. LAWSON.

[51 Pac. 1032.]

Appropriation or Water — First in Time, First in Eight. — In case of conflict between the appropriators of water in a given stream, that appropriation that is first in time, is first in right. The decision in *Hillman v. Hardmeh,*3 Idaho, 255, 28 Pac. 438, cited and approved.

(Syllabus by the court.)

APPEAL from Third Judicial District, Idaho Territory, Custer County.

Hawley & Beeves, for Appellant.

No brief filed.

Texas Angel, for Kespondent.

No brief filed.

HUSTON, J.

— This case has been pending in this court since 1892, but owing to the fact that two members of this *29court were disqualified to consider or decide the case, haying been of counsel in the court below, it has remained undisposed of. The objection no longer existing, and the parties desiring a disposition of the case, it is submitted for decision. There is no bill of exceptions, no assignment of errors, and no briefs, filed in the ease, the statement containing upward of four hundred folios, a large portion of which is taken up with pleadings in the case. The court finds, as matter of fact, that the plaintiffs are entitled, as prior locators, to all the waters of Alder creek, the right to the waters of said creek being the sole question in litigation; that plaintiffs are the owners of twelve hundred and eighty acres of land, for the irrigation of which the waters of said Alder creek are necessary and used for that purpose. The court then proceeds, admittedly, without authority of law or precedent, and apportions to the defendants absolutely a certain amount of said water, and makes such apportionment to defendants coequal with the rights of plaintiffs, already found to be prior to those of defendants. The only question involved in this case was decided by this court in the case of *Hillman v.*Hardwick, 3 Idaho, 255, 28 Pac. 438. The district court, having found that plaintiffs were entitled, by virtue ■of a prior location, to the waters of Alder creek, and that they had been and were using the same in the irrigation of their land, should have stopped there, as that was the only question involved. The utmost extent to which the court had authority to go was to declare that such waters of Alder creek as were not necessarily required by plaintiffs in the proper and necessary irrigation of their land might be used by defendants, but that •all rights of defendants to such water were and must remain inferior and subservient to the rights of plaintiffs. The case is remanded to the district court, with instructions to modify and reform the judgment and decree herein in conformity to this opinion, each party to pay one-half of the cost of the appeal.

Quarles, J., concurs.

Sullivan, C. J., having been of counsel in the lower court, took no part in the hearing or decision. .
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Savings Financial Group, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Larry W.
Myers, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.





DATE:  August 14, 2009
                  BY:
                  /s/ Larry W. MyersLarry
      W. MyersPresident
      and ChiefExecutive
      Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Bond R. Isaacson, certify that: 

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Concord EFS, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions): 

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Metalline Mining Company on Form S-3 (file No. 333-154631), Form S-8 (file No. 333-34226),  and Form S-8 (file No. 333-140588), of our report dated January 13, 2011 relating to the audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for the years ending October 31, 2010 and 2009, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Metalline Mining Company for the year ended October 31, 2010.
 
 
 
 /s/ HEIN& ASSOCIATES LLP HEIN& ASSOCIATES LLP
 
 Denver, Colorado
 January 13, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 87 (Thursday, May 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 24971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Notice of Meeting; Sunshine Act

Public Announcement: Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b].

Agency Holding Meeting: Department of Justice, Parole Commission.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, May 6, 2010.

Place:  5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: The following matters have been placed on the 
agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting:
    1. Approval of Minutes from the January 21, 2010 Quarterly Business 
Meeting.
    2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, and Section 
Administrators.
    3. Revision of YRA Set Aside Rule.

Agency Contact: Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, 
United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

    Dated: April 27, 2010.
Rockne J. Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-10436 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
EXHIBIT 10.1








AMENDMENT


TO THE


ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.


2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN





THIS AMENDMENT, amending the St. Jude Medical, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is adopted by St. Jude Medical, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”).


WHEREAS, the Company has heretofore established and maintains the St. Jude Medical, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and amendments thereto (as amended, the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Board of Directors has retained the power to amend the Plan and the proposed amendment to the Plan does not require shareholder approval; and


WHEREAS, the Board has authorized the amendment of the Plan as provided herein.


NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 9(a) of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


|   |                                                            
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|1. | Section 5(c) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety.

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan is in all respects ratified and confirmed and all the terms, conditions and provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer on the 1 day of May, 2013.





ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.





By:  /s/ Jason Zellers_______________________________


Its:  Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary