alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 6150.

October 5, 1934.)

#### STATE, Respondent, v. MALCOLM BENTLEY, Appellant.

[36 Pac. (2d) 532.]

A. S. Dickinson, for Appellant.

Bert H. Miller, Attorney General, Ariel L. Crowley, Assistant Attorney General, and F. J. Cowan, Prosecuting Attorney of Bingham County, for Respondent.

GIYENS, J.

A. C. Carlson and Malcolm Bentley were convicted of forgery. On appeal, Carlson’s conviction was sustained but Bentley was granted a new trial because of the insufficiency of the evidence against him. *(State v. Carlson,*53 Ida. 139, 22 Pac. (2d) 143.)

Appellant’s sole assignment of error is the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain his second conviction herein appealed from.

At the retrial, in addition to evidence similar to that introduced at the first trial, detailed in the opinion on the former appeal above referred to, there was testimony by handwriting experts that the signature on the allegedly forged check was made by the same person who signed two identification finger-print cards. These identification cards were signed by appellant at the Bingham county jail. *781Appellant’s mother and brother testified on his behalf that the signature on the check was not his, and the defense generally was a denial that the defendant had signed the check in question and that it had been signed by Carlson in collusion with the complaining witness’ wife, then estranged from her husband; she did not appear as a witness, and the showing in this particular was only inferential.

Conceding the dispute and contradiction as to who signed the check in question, the circumstances are not such as to render impossible or improbable the conclusion of the state’s handwriting experts, nor, except by such contradiction, were they impeached, and added to their conclusions was the opportunity for the jury itself to compare the disputed cheek with the exemplar. Furthermore such comparison by the court itself does not so necessarily lead to a contrary conclusion as to render *Bane v. Gwinn,*7 Ida. 439, 63 Pac. 634, decisively in point.

Considered with all the circumstances shown by the testimony herein, the authorities sustain the conclusion that this expert testimony is sufficient to overcome the deficiencies of the first trial and sustain the conviction herein. *(Castner v. Castner,*196 Ky. 660, 245 S. W. 281; *People v. Driggs,*14 Cal. App. 507, 112 Pac. 577; *Baird v. Shaffer,*101 Kan. 585, 168 Pac. 836, L. R. A. 1918D, 638, and note; *In re Zimmerli’s Estate,*162 Wash. 243, 298 Pac. 326; *Rolland v. Porterfield,*183 Cal. 466, 191 Pac. 913, at 914, 915; 11 R. C. L. 620-622; *In re Yowell’s Estate,*75 Utah, 312, 285 Pac. 285; *State v. Ryno,*68 Kan. 348, 74 Pac. 1114, 64 L. R. A. 303.)

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Budge, C. J., and Morgan, Holden and Wernette, JJ., concur.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

*******************************************

DYLIA L. WHITE, *

* No. 12

- 362V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v

. *

* Filed: June 10, 2013

SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT *

OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Stipulation; influenza vaccine;

* Guillain

- Barré syndrome

Respondent. *

*******************************************

David C. Richards , Christensen and Jensen, P.C., Salt Lake City, UT, for Petitioner;

Debra Filteau Begley , United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On June 7, 2013 , the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for

compensation filed by Dylia L. White on June 7, 2012 . In her petition, petitioner a lleged that the

influenza vaccine , which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C .F.R.

§100.3(a), and which she received on September 24, 2009 , caused her to suffer Guillain

- Barré

Syndrome (“GBS”). Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer

GBS or any other injury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A.

The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in

awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awar ded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $ 112,500 .00 in the form of a check payable to

petitioner, Dylia L. White

. T his amount represents compensation for

all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a).

1 T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002),

requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the

parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical inf ormation or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is

directed to enter judgment in cas e 12

- 362 V according to this decision and the attached

stipulation. 2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Tucker McCarthy , at (202) 357

- 6 3 92

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing

a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
From: "Requests,Quote" (quote.requests@gartner.com)
To: "'Christophe Bianchi'" (xtophe@simplex.com)
Cc: agould@wsgr.com
Subject: RE: Consent for one additional manufacture quote.
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:29:21 - 0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

Dear Christophe:

No problem at all with the numerous requests. The following revised quote has
been approved for usage in the Simplex SEC filing document. Please note the
changes and the appropriate sourcing:

"Gartner/Dataquest also reports, in a December 2000 study that, while the
average transistor counts of cell-based integrated circuits continue to climb
above 10 million to 20 million transistors, ... system designers are starting
to use cell-based integrated circuits with more than 40 million transistors..."

Gartner Dataquest, "System Designers' Wants and Needs". Bryan Lewis. December
2000.

Thank you and regards,

Pamela A. Miranda
Quote Requests
Gartner
quote.requests@gartner.com
203.316.6178
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)

         I, Melissa Payner-Gregor, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bluefly, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

                  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

                  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

                  a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 28, 2006                             /s/ Melissa Payner-Gregor
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Melissa Payner-Gregor
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JAMES JORDAN

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 23

- 0 12 7 (UNA)

)

ALL STAR AUTO SALES

, et al.

, )

)

Defendant s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and pro se c omplaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be

dismissed without prejudice.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under these statutes, federal jurisdiction is available

when a “federal question” is presented or when the parties are of d iverse citizenship and the

amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. “For jurisdiction to exist under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there

must be complete diversity between the parties, which is to say that the plaintiff may not be a

citizen of the same state as any def endant.” Bush v. Butler , 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C.

2007) (citing Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger , 437 U.S. 365, 373

- 74 (1978)). A party

seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the Court’s

jurisd iction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).

This complaint neither presents a federal question nor establishes diversity jurisdiction , as

a ll the parties appear to reside or conduct business in Laurel, Maryland , and the amount in2

controversy does not meet th e $75,000 threshold . Therefore, because subject matter jurisdiction

is wanting, the Court must dismiss this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

An Order is issued separately.

DATE: January 25, 2023 /s/

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge
Exhibit
4

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

The Board of Directors Four Seasons
Hotels Inc.

We consent to the inclusion in this annual
report on Form 40-F of (i) our audit report dated March 8, 2006 on the
consolidated balance sheets of Four Seasons Hotels Inc. as at December
31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated statements of operations,
retained earnings, cash provided by operations and cash flows for the
years then ended, (ii) our audit report dated March 8, 2006, on the
supplementary information entitled "Reconciliation with
United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles",
and (iii) our Comments for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting
Difference, dated March 8, 2006, each of which is contained in this
annual report on Form 40-F of Four Seasons Hotels Inc. for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Toronto, Canada March 8,
2006

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report of China
Fruits Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:April
29, 2011;By:;/s/ Chen, Quan Long

Chen, Quan Long

Chief Executive
Officer
----

|   Title of issue  | Amounts as towhich registrationis effective  | Names ofexchanges onwhich registered  |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| N/A                         | N/A                                          | N/A                                   |

|                                                                                                                                 | JOHN PRATOCanadian Consul GeneralCanadian Consulate1251 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, N.Y. 10020 or  |                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                 | GLENN CAMPBELLCanadian Consulate1251 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, N.Y. 10020 Copies to:             |                                                                                            |
| KAREN LAYNGDeputy Minister of FinanceMinistry of FinanceProvince of Saskatchewan2350 Albert StreetRegina, SaskatchewanCanada S4P 4A6 |                                                                                                             | JOHN W . WHITECravath, Swaine – MooreWorldwide Plaza825 Eighth AvenueNew York, N.Y. 10019 |

----

| This amendment to the Province of Saskatchewan's (the "Province") Annual Report on Form 18-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 is being filed to include as exhibits to such Form 18-K:     |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (h):2010-2011 Saskatchewan Third Quarter Financial Report                                                                                                                                                  |   |

----

|   | PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN  |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | By                             |  /s/ Rae Haverstock |
|   |                           | Name: Title:  | Rae HaverstockAssistant Deputy Minister of FinanceTreasury and Debt Management DivisionMinistry of Finance |

----

| EXHIBIT | (h): | 2010-2011 Saskatchewan Third Quarter Financial Report |
|---------|------|------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Bluefly, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melissa
Payner-Gregor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Melissa Payner-Gregor
-------------------------
Melissa Payner-Gregor
Chief Executive Officer
February 28, 2006
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-111791,
333-107723, 333-106944, 333-111150) and S-8 (No. 333-108817, 333-92340, 333-84710, 333-44548,
333-60150) of UTStarcom, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2004 relating to the financial statements and of our report dated February 27, 2004 relating to the
financial statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K.

|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |  | 
|------------------------------ |  | 

San
Francisco, California
March 8, 2004

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Reissuance

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   License No.                            Name/address                   Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
020056N.........................................  A.M.C. Shipping, LLC 79      November 1, 2009.
                                                   Edna Avenue, Bridgeport,
                                                   CT 06610.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010-1072 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Value Estates, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marina
Karpilovski, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operation of the Company.


/s/ Marina Karpilovski
--------------------------------
Marina Karpilovski
Principal Executive Officer
October 1, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23669-23670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural 
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. 
L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the 
question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the 
purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, 
are being manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations 
and be postmarked on or before May 24, 2010. Address written comments 
to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined between 
8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 
3720.
Docket Number: 10-008. Applicant: Colorado State University, Department 
of Biomedical Sciences 200 Westlake St., Campus Delivery 1617, Fort 
Collins, CO 80523. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, 
Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: This instrument will be used for the 
tomographic analysis of viruses. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: 
There are no instruments of the same general category as this 
instrument being produced in the United States. Application accepted by 
Commissioner of Customs: April 15, 2010.
Docket Number: 10-009. Applicant: University of Oregon, Purchasing & 
Contracting Services, 720 E. 13th Ave., Suite 302, Eugene, OR 97401-
3753. Instrument: Electron Microscope Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech

[[Page 23670]]

Republic. Intended Use: This instrument will be used to study the size, 
shape and elemental compositions of nanoparticles to determine the 
effect on biological interactions at the nano scale. Justification for 
Duty-Free Entry: There are no instruments of the same general category 
as this instrument being produced in the United States. Application 
accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 15, 2010.

    Dated: April 28, 2010.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-10487 Filed 5-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S