alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 87 (Thursday, May 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 24941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-1093-000]


Delaware City Refining Company LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

April 28, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Delaware City Refining Company LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a2c2f382925040603040f391f1a1a05181e2a0c0f1809440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="377172657478595b5e595264424747584543775152455419505841">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10633 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                    OF THE
                        1999 DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN
                                      OF
                               SYMMETRICOM, INC.

         The undersigned, Thomas W. Steipp and William Slater, do hereby
certify:

         1.    They are the duly elected and acting Chief Executive Officer and
Secretary, respectively, of Symmetricom, Inc., a California corporation (the
"Corporation").

         2.    Section 4(a)(iii) of the 1999 Director Stock Option Plan of the
Corporation is amended to read as follows:

               "(iii) On January I of each year, each Outside Director
               shall be automatically granted an Option (a "Subsequent
               Option") to purchase 10,000 Shares or a pro rata share
               of the 10,000 Shares based on the time period between
               the Director's start date and January I as a percentage
               of twelve months, provided he or she is then an Outside
               Director and if as of such date, he or she shall have
               served on the Board for at least the preceding six (6)
               months."

         3.    The foregoing amendment of the 1999 Director Stock Option Plan
has been duly approved by the board of directors.

         4.    The foregoing amendment of the 1999 Director Stock Option Plan
has been duly approved by the required vote of the shareholders. The total
number of outstanding shares of the Corporation entitled to vote with respect to
the amendment is 23,306,217 shares of Common Stock. The number of shares voting
in favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required. The percentage
vote required was a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.

         We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State
of California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and
correct of our own knowledge.

Dated: October 31, 2000



                                  /s/ Thomas Steipp
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Thomas W. Steipp, Chief Executive Officer




                                  /s/ William Slater
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  William Slater, Secretary
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON, INC.**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: 

 

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 Nos. 333-131026 and 333-119102) ofNeoMagic Corporation; 

 

(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8Nos. 333-127439, 333-119093, 333-30843, 333-57217, 333-88383, 333-50406, 333-70222, 333-102231, and 333-109023) of NeoMagic Corporation; 

 

of our report dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of NeoMagic Corporation for the year ended January 31,2006, NeoMagic Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of NeoMagic Corporation as of the year endedJanuary 31, 2006, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2006. 

 

/s/ Stonefield Josephson, Inc. 

 

San Francisco, California 

April 5, 2006
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before TANG , LAWRENCE , and COGLEY Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Arthur B. SANDERS III Machinist’s Mate First Class ( E

- 6 ), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202000060

Decided: 8 June 2020 Appeal from the United S tates Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge : Kim berly J. Kelly
Sentence adjudged 9 December 2019 by a special court

- martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entr y of Judgment : reduction to E

- 5 , confinement for 60 days , and a bad

- conduct di scharge

. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Jacqueline M. Leonard, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as bindi ng precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.United States v. Sanders , NMCCA No. 20 2000060 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and f act and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 , 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support

Program Evaluation Report

Document Number: DCAS-PER-093 

Effective Date: 06/03/2021 

Texas City Chemicals, TBD Rev. 01 Page 1 of 2

Author: Signature on file 

 Dave Allen, HP Team Leader

Date: 06/02/2021 Supersedes: none 

Approval: Signature on file 

 T. Taulbee, Associate Director for Science

Date: 06/03/2021 

RECORD OF ISSUE/REVISIONS

ISSUE 

AUTHORIZATION 

DATE

EFFECTIVE

DATE

DESCRIPTION

06/02/2021 06/03/2021 New document to determine the effect of 

issuing revision 1 to DCAS-TKBS-0011

(Texas City Chemicals TBD) on 

previously completed claims.

1.0 Description

A Technical Basis Document (TBD) for Texas City Chemicals (TCC) was issued on 

11/2/2017. Prior to that, dose reconstructions utilized methods found in the TCC Special 

Exposure Cohort Evaluation Report (SEC00 0088 ER rev. 1). DCAS-PER-085 was 

issued 10/17/2018 to evaluate the effects of issuing revision 0 of the TBD. 

A revision to the Texas City Chemical TBD (DCAS-TKBS-0011 revision 1) was issued 

4/27/2020. The effect of issuing that revision on previously completed claims is the 

subject of this PER. 

2.0 Issue Evaluation 

In revision 1 of the TCC TBD, the method used to calculate ingestion intakes during the 

residual period was modified. The revised calculation resulted in an increase in ingestion 

doses starting from 10/1/1955 and continuing through 1977. 

Other corrections and reformatting occurred in revision 1 but no other revisions resulted 

in an increase in dose.
Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support

Program Evaluation Report

Document Number: DCAS-PER-093 

Effective Date: 06/03/2021 Page 2 of 2

3.0 Plan for Resolving Corrective Action 

A search of the NIOSH Claims Tracking System (NOCTS) database identified 14 claims 

with TCC employment after 10/1/1955 and a probability of causation (POC) below 50%. 

Dose for the 14 claims was recalculated using revision 1 of the TCC TBD as well as all 

other applicable procedures. Thirteen of claims resulted in a new POC below 45% and 

one resulted in a POC between 45% and 50%. For the one claim, IREP was run 30 times 

at 10,000 iterations per NIOSH procedures. The resulting POC remained below 50%. 

NIOSH will provide the Department of Labor with the list of all the claims evaluated 

under this PER. Since none resulted in a probability of causation greater than 50%, 

NIOSH will not request the return of any claims.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,016
<SECURITIES>                                    18,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,200
<INVENTORY>                                      1,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,669
<PP&E>                                          29,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,746
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           342
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,419
<SALES>                                         67,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,588
<CGS>                                            7,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,943
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,146
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 5, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Joint Venture to Perform Project Entitled Versatile Onboard Traffic Embedded Roaming Sensors (“VOTERS”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Trilion Quality Systems, Plymouth Meeting, PA, has been added as a party to this venture. Also, Witten Technologies, Inc., Somerville, MA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                          ( print page 25295)    

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and VOTERS intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 10, 2009, VOTERS filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 13, 2009 (74 FR 10967).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010–10460 Filed 5–6–10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

I, James P. Hart, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report of Valley National Gases
Incorporated;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: September 28, 2004

/s/ James P. Hart
------------------------------
Acting Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1638 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1638

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 extend the retroactive eligibility dates for financial assistance for 
higher education for spouses and dependent children of Federal, State, 
 and local law enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RETROACTIVE ELIGIBILITY DATES FOR FINANCIAL 
              ASSISTANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION FOR SPOUSES AND CHILDREN 
              OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1216(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796d-5(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``May 1, 1992'', and inserting ``January 1, 
        1978,'' ; and
            (2) by striking ``October 1, 1997,'' and inserting 
        ``January 1, 1978,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect October 1, 1999.

            Passed the Senate May 15, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1638

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 extend the retroactive eligibility dates for financial assistance for 
higher education for spouses and dependent children of Federal, State, 
 and local law enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty.
```
Exhibit 10.50

                     AMENDMENT #2 TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT

                                                                  March 17, 2003
Bluefly, Inc.
42 West 39 Street
New York, New York 10018

Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to the Reimbursement Agreement (the "Reimbursement
Agreement") dated as of March 30, 2001, as amended, between Bluefly, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, and Quantum Industrial Partners LDC, a Cayman Island
limited duration company. This will confirm that the Reimbursement Agreement is
hereby amended as follows:

         1.       The first sentence in Section 1 is deleted in its entirety and
                  the following is substituted in its place and stead: "QIP
                  hereby agrees to procure and maintain a Standby Letter of
                  Credit until November 15, 2004, as Account Party, for the
                  benefit of Lender in an amount equal to $2,000,000 for
                  delivery by March 17, 2003."

         2.       The following language is added to the end of Section 6 (a):
                  "As partial consideration for and a condition to its
                  increasing the value of and maintaining the Standby Letter of
                  Credit from March 17, 2003 until November 15, 2004, the Soros
                  Entities shall each receive from Borrower a warrant
                  substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A hereto
                  (provided, however, that the warrants issued pursuant to this
                  sentence shall have an exercise price equal to the Current
                  Market Price as of March 17, 2003 and an expiration date of
                  March 17, 2013 to purchase that number of shares of the Common
                  Stock obtained by multiplying TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND (25,000) by
                  such Soros Entity's Percentage Interest (as defined in Section
                  6(c) below)."

         Except as herinabove specifically set forth, the Reimbursement
Agreement shall continue unmodified.

                                Very truly yours,

                                QUANTUM INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS LDC

                                By: /s/ John F. Brown
                                    -----------------------------
                                    Name: John. F. Brown
                                    Title: Attorney in fact

Agreed:

BLUEFLY, INC.

By: /s/ E. Kenneth Seiff
    ------------------------------
    Name: E. Kenneth Seiff
    Title: CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JESSE EARL AUL,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 327 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 13th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**