alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| Name of the Company                         | Country ofIncorporation |   | Percentage ofOwnershipInterest |
|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                                        |                    |   |                           |   |   |
| Subsidiaries:                               |                    |   |                           |   |   |
|                                        |                    |   |                           |   |   |
| Gold Frost Ltd.                             | Israel                  |   |                           | 100.0 | % |
|                                        |                    |   |                           |   |   |
| WF Kosher Food Distributors Ltd.            | USA                     |   |                           | 100. 0 | % |
|                                        |                    |   |                           |   |   |
| Shamir Salads (2006) Ltd..                  | Israel                  |   |                           | 51.0 | % |
|                                        |                    |   |                           |   |   |
| W.F.D. (Import, Marketing and Trading) Ltd. | Israel                  |   |                           | 100.00 | % |

----

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 84 (Monday, May 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 23295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW164359]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease, 
Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920, 
as amended, and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regulations, the BLM 
received a petition for reinstatement from Western American Resources, 
LLC and East Resources, Inc. for competitive oil and gas lease 
WYW164359 for land in Goshen County, WY. The petition was filed on time 
and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease 
terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. 
Weaver, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-
6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW164359 
effective October 1, 2009, under the original terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The 
BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.

Julie L. Weaver,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 2010-10294 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
# Instructions

Instructions for Completing NIOSH TablesJuly 2021There are 3 NIOSH Tables that should be submitted with the application.   Tables will be submitted as PDFs. Tables 1 and 2 should be submitted for each academic program (discipline) in the application.  Table 1.  Academic Training Report.  This table should be provided for each academic program (discipline) in the application.  Reporting period for renewals is from the start date of prior competing award. New applicants should report past five years. Table 2.  Trainees and Graduates.  This table should be provided for each academic program (discipline) in the application.  Do not use trainees' names, but a trainee id or #.  Columns that are specifically for Occupational Medicine programs may be deleted (column B and columnF) if not requesting support for an Occupational Medicine program.  Tables 1 and 2 should be inserted at the end of each academic program narrative.Table 3.  Continuing Education Offerings by Program Area.  Provide the information requested; new rows may be added as needed.  ERCs submitting renewals may use their CE Annual Performance Tables instead of Table 3.  Table 3 should be inserted after the Continuing Education Program narrative.

# Table 1

&8[ ] Program Area 	&8Program Director [ ]	&8Center Director [ ]

&"-,Regular"Acacemic Program:__________________________	&"-,Regular"Program Director:______________________________	&"-,Regular"Applicant Institution:____________________________ 

&8       Table 3b		&8Revised May 2012

&"-,Regular"&8  &10     Table 1		&"-,Regular"July 2021

# Table 2

&8[ ] Program Area	&8Program Director [ ]	&8Center Director [ ]

&"-,Regular"Academic Program:_______________________________	&"-,Regular"Program Director:_________________________________	&"-,Regular"Applicant Institution:____________________________

&8      Table 8		&8Revised May 2012

&"-,Regular"Table 2		&"-,Regular"August 2021

# Table 3

&"-,Bold"Table 3 Continuing Education Offerings for New Application&"Arial,Bold"s	

&"-,Regular"       Table 3 - CE Table for New Applicants		&"-,Regular"August 2021

ERCs submitting renewals may use their annual CE Performance Tables, instead of Table 3.Include past 5 years of CE offerings.  For ERC renewals the reporting period is from the start date of prior competing award.  Report contact hours as defined by a 50 minutes session to measure continuing education courses.
SECURADYNE SYSTEMS, 

LLC,

Appellant,

v.

ROBERT CARMICHAEL, 

RICHARD PEARSON, and 

CYBERONE SYSTEMS, LLC,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5413

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 1, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

Russell F. Van Sickle of Beggs & Lane RLLP, Pensacola, and Mark A. Shoffner of 

Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, Dallas, TX, for Appellant.

Darryl Steve Traylor, T.A. Borowski, and Louis E. Harper, III of Borowksi & 

Traylor, Pensacola, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Charlotte A. Willson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to NeoMagic and will be retained by NeoMagic and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: May 17, 2010





By: /s/ Charlotte A. Willson
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40261 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Jose Luis Gutierrez**

**- Romo,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:20

- CR

- 836

- 1

Before **Jolly, Willett,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Gutierrez

- Romo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gutierrez

- Romo has not filed a

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 13, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40261 Document: 00516128508 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2021No. 21

- 40261

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for ap pellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-40261 Document: 00516128508 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/13/2021
Exhibit 32.01
















STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the Form 10-Q) of 1st Financial Services Corporation (the Company), we, Michael G. Mayer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Holly L. Schreiber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify to our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b)            the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.








Date: August 11, 2011
By:
/s/ Michael G. MayerMichael G. MayerChief Executive Officer
 
 Date: August 11, 2011
By:
/s/ Holly L. SchreiberHolly L. SchreiberChief Financial Officer


This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Annual Report of Premier Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jasmine Gregory,  the Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  September 9, 2010



/s/   Jasmine Gregory

Jasmine Gregory

Chief Financial Officer, and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Time and Date:

Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 9 a.m.-12 Noon.

# Place:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# Status:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

## Matters To Be Considered

### 1. Pending Decisional Matters

(a) Testing and Labeling to Product Certification—Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) and Testing Component Parts—Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR); (b) CPSA 15(j) Rule for Drawstrings—Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR); and (c) CPSA 15(j) Rule for Hairdryers—Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR).

### 2. Infant Bath Seats—Final Rule—and Laboratory Accreditation

                    A live Web cast of the Meeting can be viewed at                     *http://www.cpsc.gov/​webcast/​index.html*.                

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

Dated: April 27, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-10375 Filed 4-29-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
769 P.2d 593

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raul ESCALANTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17371.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Feb. 22, 1989.

Michael J. Wood, Twin Falls, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Myma A.I. Stah-man, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In a trial to the district court, after having waived his right to a jury, Raul Esca-lante was found guilty of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance. The state’s evidence showed that Count I, delivery of marijuana, had occurred on December 30, 1986, prior to the Unified Sentencing Act, and that Count II, delivery of cocaine, had occurred after the effective date of the Act. I.C. § 19-2513. Accordingly, the district court sentenced Esca-lante to the custody of the Board of Correction for an indeterminate four-year term on Count I, and to a concurrent eight-year *717term, with a three-year minimum confinement, on Count II. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court abused its sentencing discretion by imposing unreasonable sentences.

Under the concurrent sentences, Esca-lante will spend at least three years in confinement. To determine whether such confinement is excessive, we conduct an independent examination of the record. We focus upon the nature of the offense and the character of the defendant. *State v. Amerson,*113 Idaho 183, 742 P.2d 438 (Ct.App.1987). Escalante’s convictions were the result of his involvement in the sale of approximately a half pound of marijuana and approximately two grams of cocaine to an undercover policeman in Twin Falls, Idaho. The cocaine was exceptionally pure, indicating that Escalante had close proximity to the source. Escalante also offered to sell additional quantities of cocaine.

With respect to Escalante’s background, the presentence investigation showed that he had been employed in various jobs, although he had entered the United States illegally from Mexico. It also showed that he had committed numerous prior misdemeanor offenses, including a simple assault with a firearm and two counts of driving under the influence.'

Having reviewed the full record and having considered the sentence review criteria set forth in *State v. Toohill,*103 Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct.App.1982), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. The judgment of conviction, including the sentences imposed, is affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                  State or
                              Jurisidiction of
                               Incorporation            Names Under Which
Name of Subsidiary            or Organization        Subsidiary Does Business
----------------------------  ----------------  ----------------------------------
<S>                           <C>               <C>
 
WinCup Holdings, Inc.(1)      Delaware          WinCup Holdings, Inc.
                                                WinCup Holdings of Texas, Inc.
                                                WinCup 

Radnor Chemical               Delaware          Radnor Chemical Corporation
Corporation (1)
 
StyroChem Canada, Ltd.(2)     Quebec            StyroChem Canada, Ltd.
                                                StyroChem International

StyroChem U.S., Ltd.(3)       Texas             StyroChem U.S., Ltd.
                                                StyroChem International

WinCup Texas, Ltd.(4)         Texas             WinCup Texas, Ltd.
                                                WinCup

StyroChem GP, L.L.C.(2)       Delaware          StyroChem GP, L.L.C.         

StyroChem LP, L.L.C.(2)       Delaware          StyroChem LP, L.L.C

WinCup GP, L.L.C.(5)          Delaware          WinCup GP, L.L.C.

WinCup LP, L.L.C.(5)          Delaware          WinCup LP, L.L.C

Radnor Management, Inc.(1)    Delaware          Radnor Management, Inc.
 
StyroChem Europe (The         The Netherlands   StyroChem Europe (The Netherlands)
Netherlands) B.V.(2)                            B.V.
 
StyroChem Finland Oy(6)       Finland           StyroChem Finland Oy
                                                StyroChem International

ThermiSol Denmark ApS(6)      Denmark           ThermiSol Denmark ApS
 
ThermiSol Finland Oy(6)       Finland           ThermiSol Finland Oy
 
ThermiSol Sweden AB(6)        Sweden            ThermiSol Sweden AB

Radnor Delaware, Inc.(5)      Delaware          Radnor Delaware, Inc.
</TABLE>

------------------
(1)      Owned 100% by Radnor Holdings Corporation.
(2)      Owned 100% by Radnor Chemical Corporation.
(3)      Owned 99% by StyroChem LP, L.L.C. and 1% by StyroChem GP, L.L.C.
(4)      Owned 99% by WinCup LP, L.L.C. and 1% by WinCup GP, L.L.C.
(5)      Owned 100% by WinCup Holdings, Inc.
(6)      Owned 100% by StyroChem Europe (The Netherlands) B.V.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER







PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Annual Report of Premier Holding Corp (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jasmine Gregory,  the Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 3, 2011



/s/   Jasmine Gregory

Jasmine Gregory

Chief Financial Officer, and Director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT 2002

This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report of
UTStarcom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").

In
connection with the Report, we, Hong Liang Lu and Francis P. Barton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
June 1, 2006

|By: |  | /s/HONG LIANG LUName:  Hong Liang Lu
Title:President and Chief Executive Officer                        |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/FRANCIS P. BARTONName:  Francis P. Barton
Title:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certifications:
I, Robert Devers, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSBA/No. 1 of Metalline Mining Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transmission instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986];
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.      Dated: February 1, 2008 By   /s/ Robert Devers