alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1895-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA-1895-DR), dated March 29, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         April 26, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective April 26, 2010.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance                               ( print page 24741)                            (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-10544 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories 

1090 Tusculum Avenue 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938 

Phone: 513-533-6825 

Fax: 513-533-6826 

March 21, 2016 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00229 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Battelle Laboratories-King Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, as an addition to 

the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000. On February 18, 2016, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §7384q(b), the 

Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

“All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked at the facility owned by the Battelle 

Laboratories at the King Avenue site in Columbus, Ohio, during the period from July 1, 

1956, through December 31, 1970, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work 

days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days 

within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in 

the Special Exposure Cohort.” 

This designation became effective on March 19, 2016, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 

§7384l(14)(C). Therefore, beginning on March 19, 2016, members of this class of employees, 

defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

[Signature on File] 

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO

              STERICYCLE, INC. 2000 NONSTATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN



    The Stericycle, Inc. 2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") is
amended as follows pursuant to the authority of the Board of Directors of
Stericycle, Inc. under Paragraph 10.2 of the Plan:

    1. PARAGRAPH 4.1. Paragraph 4.1 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

       4.1  MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES. The maximum total number of shares of
    Common Stock for which Options may be granted under this Plan is 750,000
    shares (subject to adjustment as provided in Paragraph 10.1).

    2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Amendment shall be effective as of February 6, 2001.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a  14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



I hereby certify that the accompanying Report of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Charles S. Howard     
|Charles S. Howard         
|Chairman, President &     
|Chief Executive Officer   
|                          
|/s/ David A. Meinert      
|David A. Meinert          
|Executive Vice President &
|Chief Financial Officer
null

Blues

46.895073
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001029863
<NAME> AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         137,499
<SECURITIES>                                    39,131
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,091
<INVENTORY>                                     21,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               351,813
<PP&E>                                         777,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,597,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          522,720
<BONDS>                                        330,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           458
<OTHER-SE>                                     622,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,597,650
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,739,526
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,670,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,105
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.10

 


	
Number
   A-
    	
 
    	
Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware
    	
 
    	
Shares
   -0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    




 

LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION

 

Series A Liberty Media Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that [               ] is the owner of [               ] FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES A LIBERTY MEDIA COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, OF LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

Dated:

 

Liberty Media Corporation

 

[Corporate Seal]

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    	
Secretary
766 P.2d 1278

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Doug J. FLORA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17133.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Dec. 30, 1988.

Howard I. Manweiler and David D. Man-weiler (argued), Manweiler, Bevis & Cameron, Boise, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Peter C. Erbland, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Doug Flora inflicted a fatal knife wound upon another man during an altercation at a residence in Blackfoot, Idaho. Although Flora initially was charged with first degree murder, the state reduced the charge to second degree murder in exchange for a guilty plea by Flora. Following acceptance of the plea to the lesser charge, Flora was *398sentenced to an indeterminate term of fifteen years in the custody of the Board of Correction. Later, Flora filed a motion under I.C.R. 35 to reduce his sentence to a period of ten years. Following a hearing, the motion was denied. The sole question for review is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Flora’s Rule 35 motion. We find no abuse of the court’s discretion and we affirm.

Flora argues that his plea of guilty was not voluntarily and knowingly entered because he had been led to believe that he would receive a sentence of not more than ten years. He also contends the district court failed to honor a representation to Flora that his sentence would not be more than ten years. Finally, he submits that he was told by the court when his guilty plea was accepted that he, Flora, would have the opportunity to withdraw his plea after he was sentenced, and that Flora subsequently was denied that opportunity.

We are not persuaded that any of these points is relevant to a motion to reduce a sentence under Rule 35. The remedy for an alleged involuntary plea of guilty lies in a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction or through an application for post conviction relief under Title 19, Chapter 49 of the Idaho Code. The defendant might also file a postjudgment motion to withdraw the guilty plea under I.C.R. 33(c). None of these remedies was pursued by Flora.

A motion under I.C.R. 35 leaves intact the plea or verdict of guilty and the adjudication of guilty under the judgment of conviction. The motion essentially is a plea for sentencing leniency. *State v. Forde,*113 Idaho 21, 740 P.2d 63 (Ct.App.1987). It is not a plea for relief from a determination of guilt.

Viewing the sentence in this case, we hold that fifteen years is not excessive in relation to the crime of which Flora stands convicted. Flora could have received a life sentence, I.C. § 18-4004, the sentence recommended by the state as part of its agreement to reduce the charge from first degree murder to second degree murder. At the hearing on the motion for reduction, Flora presented no evidence, beyond that adduced in the original sentencing proceeding, to show any undue severity in his sentence. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.

The order denying Flora’s motion to reduce his sentence is affirmed.
(No. 5951.

June 22, 1933.)

#### JAMES M. BREBNER, Respondent, v. WESTERN PINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LIMITED, a Corporation, Appellant.

[23 Pac. (2d) 723.]

*315Whitla & Knudson, for Appellant.

William D. Keeton, for Respondent.

HOLDEN, J.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal of the Western Pine Manufacturing Company upon the ground that the undertaking on appeal was not filed within five days after the service of the notice of appeal. The notice of appeal was served July 26, 1932, and the undertaking on appeal was filed August 2, 1932. Section 11-202, I. C. A., provides that an ‘ ‘ appeal is ineffectual for any purpose unless within five days after service of the notice of appeal, an undertaking be filed, or a deposit of money be made with the clerk, .... or the undertaking be waived by the adverse party in writing.” The undertaking was not waived and there was no deposit of money. The requirements of the foregoing statute are mandatory and jurisdictional, and failure of compliance therewith gives this court no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, and the same must be dismissed. *(McMillan v. Sproat,*47 Ida. 724, 278 Pac. 224, and cases therein cited.)

Costs to respondent.

Budge, C. J., and Givens, Morgan and Wernette, JJ., concur.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 157

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax 9 millimeter, .25

caliber, and .32 caliber bullets.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax 9

millimeter, .25 caliber, and .32 caliber bullets.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Real Cost of Handgun

5 Ammunition Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN TAX ON CERTAIN BULLETS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4181 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to the imposition of tax on

9 firearms, etc.) is amended by adding at the end the follow10 ing new flush sentence:
2

•S 157 IS

1 ‘‘In the case of 9 millimeter, .25 caliber, or .32 caliber

2 ammunition, the rate of tax under this section shall be

3 1,000 percent.’’

4 (b) EXEMPTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT PUR5 POSES.—Section 4182 of the Internal Revenue Code of

6 1986 (relating to exemptions) is amended by adding at

7 the end the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(d) LAW ENFORCEMENT.—The last sentence of sec9 tion 4181 shall not apply to any sale (not otherwise ex10 empted) to, or for the use of, the United States (or any

11 department, agency, or instrumentality thereof) or a State

12 or political subdivision thereof (or any department, agen13 cy, or instrumentality thereof).’’

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section shall apply to sales after December 31, 1999.

Æ
Exhibit
32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
   SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Power Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:
August 20,
2010                                                                           By: /s/ Johannes
Petersen
 Johannes
Petersen
 Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Director
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00798-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.M. AND J.M., children

Appeal from the 314th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011-00219J).

TO THE 314TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 17th day of March 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on September 8, 2014. After submitting the 

case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised 

by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment 

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms 

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Avery Juwon 

Myrick, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 
for observance.

Judgment rendered March 17, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bland.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

June 26, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

(pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to

# Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the annual report of BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Iris Yahal, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Iris Yahal

Iris YahalChief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

March 27, 2006

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd. and will
be retained by BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



---

---
exhibit.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 




CHANGE MANAGEMENT FORM #1 to the Agreement


Comcast and Support.com








	
Statements of Work (“SOWs”):


Master Services Agreement, Call Handling Services (“Agreement”), dated October 1, 2013, between Support.com, Inc. (“Support.com”) and Comcast Cable Communications Management (“Comcast”)

	
PCR No.:


	
Originator:  Joy Park

	
Date: December 15, 2015


	
Department: NCO

	
Phone #: 215-286-3934

	
Title: Vice President


	
Locations Impacted: All facilities that provide support to Comcast under this Agreement


	
Requested Implementation Date: December 11, 2015


	
Estimated Hours: (LOE)

	
o  Billable         X Non-Billable

	
Billing Rate/Hour: N/A


	
Fixed Fee Cost (if applicable) N/A


	
Type of Change: Comcast and Support.com agree to modify the Agreement as set forth below.  Unless specifically provided in this Change Management Form (“CMF”), all other terms of the Agreement remain unchanged.


	
Scope of Change:

	
TMinor (Anything within current contract)

	
oMajor (may require contract amendment)


MUST BE REVIEWED BY Business and/or P&L Owner













	
Area(s) of Change


	
   Accounting/Payroll

	
    Network


	
   Data Processing

	
    Resource Planning


	
   General Facilities

	
    Quality Assurance


	
   Human Resources

	
    Telecom


	
   IT/BI

	
    Training


	
   Operations

	
    Recruiting


	
X   Other:  Section 4.13 of the Agreement












Effective December 11, 2015, the parties, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, agree to modify the Agreement as follows:








	
1.  

	
Section 4.13 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:







 

 


4.13           Vendor agrees to maintain dedicated quality assurance staff focused on monitoring the customer quality experience and ensuring Vendor is adhering to Comcast's Quality Support Guidelines.  As used herein, "Comcast Quality Support Guidelines" are a Comcast developed set of defined behaviors and performance criteria to which all CSRs are measured regarding their interaction with Comcast customers or prospective customers from a quality perspective.   Vendor’s quality assurance staff will perform four (4) evaluations per CSR per month.   Vendor’s quality assurance staff will assess CSR and team leader evaluations and identify calibration gaps.  If gaps are identified, the quality assurance staff will develop corrective action plans to eliminate the identified gap(s). 

















Comcast Authorization


Comcast Representative’s Signature__/s/ Joy Park____________________________________________________












Print Name                           _____Joy Park______                                                                  Date____________12-15-15___________












Support.com Authorization


Support.com Representative’s Signature___/s/ Roop K. Lakkaraju________________________________________












Print Name                      ______Roop K. Lakkaraju_____                                                                           Date________12-15-15_________
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the six month period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arun Govil, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Arun
Govil


Arun
Govil


Chief
Executive Officer


and
principal executive officer


May 20,
2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.