alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

Calendar No. 325

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1731

[Report No. 106–191]

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that certain environmental reports

shall continue to be required to be submitted.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 14, 1999

Mr. CHAFEE, from the Committee on Environment and Public Works, reported the following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the

calendar

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that certain environmental reports shall continue to be required to be submitted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN

4 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS.

5 (a) ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION TO GREAT WATERS

6 REPORT.—Section 112(m)(5) of the Clean Air Act (42

7 U.S.C. 7412(m)(5)) is amended by striking ‘‘Within’’ and
2

•S 1731 PCS

1 inserting ‘‘Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public Law

2 104–66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734), within’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section takes effect on the earlier of—

5 (1) the date of enactment of this Act; or

6 (2) December 19, 1999.

Calendar No. 325

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1731

[Report No. 106–191]

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that certain

environmental reports shall continue to be required to be submitted.

OCTOBER 14, 1999

Read twice and placed on the calendar
Order entered April 18, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 01621 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 01622 - CR JOSHUA PULLIAM - ROBERTS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F12 - 34121 - J , F12 - 34219 - J 

### O RDER T he Court GRANTS appellant’s April 4, 2013 motion to supplement the record. We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record within FIFTEEN DAYS from the da te of this order that contains a competency report from Dr. Michael Pittman or written verification that you do not have the report. We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, and counsel for all parties. We ORDER appellant to file his brief within FORTY - FIVE DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Interim
Report on Form 10-Q of Technology Research Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Director, President and Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | By: /s/ Owen Farren    
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Owen Farren            
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Technology Research Corporation and will be retained by Technology Research Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
A96A0627.

#### SOUTHERN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WATSON.

(471 SE2d 559)

Ruffin, Judge.

Charles Watson suffered injuries in an automobile collision with Augustus Bubba McCord and incurred over $12,000 in medical expenses. Watson was insured with Southern General Insurance Company (“Southern General”), whose automobile policy provided him $2,500 in medical payments coverage. After Watson settled his claim against McCord for $25,000, he sued Southern General to recover the available medical payments benefits. Southern General refused to pay because, pursuant to a reimbursement clause in its *485policy, if it gave Watson the $2,500, he would have to give it right back to the insurer. In this interlocutory appeal, we find Southern General entitled to judgment on the pleadings and reverse the trial court’s denial of Southern General’s motion.

Decided May 21, 1996.

*Young, Thagard, Hoffman, Scott & Smith, James B. Thagard, John H. Smith, Jr.,*for appellant.

*J. Converse Bright,*for appellee.

The reimbursement clause in question provides: *“Our Recovery Rights (Subrogation)”*In the event of any payment under this policy, we are entitled to all the rights of recovery which the person to whom payment was made may have against another person or organization. You and any insured person must sign and deliver to us any legal papers relating to that recovery, and do whatever else is necessary to help us exercise those rights and do nothing after a loss to prejudice our rights.

“If there is a recovery we shall be reimbursed out of the recovery for expenses, costs, and any attorney’s fees incurred in connection with this recovery.

“When a person has been paid damages by us under this policy and also recovers from another, the amount recovered from the other shall be held by that person in trust for us to the extent of our payment.”

This action is controlled by the recently decided case of *Integon Gen. Ins. Co. v. Thompson,*220 Ga. App. 631 (469 SE2d 346) (1996). The language in the second two paragraphs of this clause creates in Southern General a right to reimbursement, even though the first paragraph of the policy provision might fun afoul of *Govt. Employees Ins. Co. v. Hirsh,*211 Ga. App. 374 (439 SE2d 59) (1993), as an assignment of a cause of action. *Thompson,*supra; see also *Shook v. Pilot Life Ins. Co.,*188 Ga. App. 714, 715 (1) (373 SE2d 813) (1988). As we held in *Thompson,*Southern General may exercise its right to recover medical payments whether or not Watson received full compensation for his other damages.

In his brief, Watson concedes that should Southern General be entitled to reimbursement regardless of whether he has been “made whole,” his claim for benefits would have no merit. Thus, we reverse the trial court’s ruling and direct that judgment be entered for Southern General.

*Judgment reversed.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Johnson, J., concur.*,
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
      undersigned, Colin Halpern, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial
      Officer and Director of Universal Services Group, Inc. (the "Company"),
      certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
      for the three month period ended February 1, 2002 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      August 15, 2007








/s/
      Colin
      Halpern





Colin
      Halpern


Chief
      Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Director





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 25305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12149 and <greek-i>12150]


Mississippi Disaster <greek-i>MS-00036

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-
1906-DR), dated 04/29/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 04/23/2010 through 04/24/2010.
    Effective Date: 04/29/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/28/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/29/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 04/29/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties

    Choctaw, Yazoo.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere..     3.625
    Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available              3.000
     Elsewhere................................................
For Economic Injury:
    Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available              3.000
     Elsewhere................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12149C 
and for economic injury is 12150C.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-10775 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a  14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

I hereby certify that the accompanying Report of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

Date: August 11, 2006



/s/ Charles S. HowardCharles S. HowardChairman, President &Chief Executive Officer/s/ David A. MeinertDavid A. MeinertExecutive Vice President &Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Integrated Security Systems, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.





Date:

November 14, 2008

/s/ Brooks Sherman

Brooks Sherman

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-11297

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO PUENTES, also known 

as Bucho, also known as 

Mario Alberto Ceballos,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CR-408-14-P

---------------------------------------------------------

July 27, 2000

Before POLITZ, HIGGINBOTHAM and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Puentes appeals his sentence, contending that the district court

plainly erred in imposing a minimum mandatory sentence of ten years because it is

undisputed that he was involved with only 100 to 400 kilograms of marihuana.

The Government concedes that an error occurred requiring remand. It does
1United States v. Ruiz, 43 F.3d 985 (5th Cir. 1995).

2

not assert Puentes’ waiver of the right to appeal as contained in the plea agreement. 

The Government’s motion to file its supplemental brief should be and is

GRANTED.

Puentes contends that the sentence imposed should be vacated. The

Government suggests that the conviction and sentence should be vacated. We

conclude that vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing corrects the

error presented by the parties.1 

Accordingly, Puentes’ sentence is VACATED and the matter is

REMANDED to the district court for resentencing based on Puentes’ involvement

with 100 to 400 kilograms of marihuana.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Zhijian (James) Zhang      |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Zhijian (James) Zhang                |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer and CEO  |
|  Date:     |  May 13, 2011                    |
|   By: |   /s/ Mandy Chung                |
|  Name:     |  Mandy Chung                          |
|  Title:    |  Principal Accounting Officer and CFO |
|  Date:     |  May 13, 2011                         |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6390

JAKIE HAMMONDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBESON COUNTY JAIL; COURTS OF ROBESON COUNTY;

STAN TODD,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-845-5-BO)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jakie Hammonds, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jakie Hammonds appeals the district court’s order construing

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint as one for

habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1999) and dismissing it. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Hammonds v. Robeson

County Jail, No. CA-99-845-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15

           APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT OF CERTAIN LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLANS

      After full discussion and on motion duly made and seconded, the following
resolutions were unanimously adopted:

      RESOLVED, that the Company's long-term incentive compensation plans,
including without limitation the 1993 Burlington Resources Inc. Stock Incentive
Plan, the 1997 Employee Stock Incentive Plan and the 1997 Performance Share Unit
Plan (the "Plans"), be, and hereby are, amended to authorize the plan
administrator named in each such plan, acting in its discretion, to accelerate
the vesting of all or any portion of any granted but unvested awards thereunder,
including without limitation stock options, restricted stock, phantom stock
units, and performance share units, in connection with the termination of a
participant's employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries and also to
authorize each such plan administrator, in its sole discretion, to delegate the
decision to accelerate such vesting to the Company's Chief Executive Officer.

      RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Company be, and hereby are,
severally authorized, for and in the name and on behalf of the Company, to
execute and deliver all instruments, and do and perform any and all acts and
things, including without limitation amending the Plans, which said officers may
deem necessary or desirable to effectuate the purpose and intent of the
foregoing resolution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,359,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,414,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                   284,461
<INVENTORY>                                 23,310,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,959,606
<PP&E>                                       2,067,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 938,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,198,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,910,447
<BONDS>                                      2,201,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,940,329
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,146,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,198,622
<SALES>                                     35,414,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,414,133
<CGS>                                       22,355,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,355,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,298,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,791,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,553,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                   553,254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,000,228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,000,228
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16



</TABLE>
II

Calendar No. 329

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1744

[Report No. 106–194]

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that certain

species conservation reports shall continue to be required to be submitted.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 18, 1999

Mr. CHAFEE, from the Committee on Environment and Public Works, reported the following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the

calendar

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide

that certain species conservation reports shall continue

to be required to be submitted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN

4 SPECIES CONSERVATION REPORTS.

5 (a) ANNUAL COST ANALYSIS.—Section 18 of the En6 dangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1544) is amend7 ed by striking ‘‘On’’ and inserting ‘‘Notwithstanding sec-
2

•S 1744 PCS

1 tion 3003 of Public Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note;

2 109 Stat. 734), on’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section takes effect on the earlier of—

5 (1) the date of enactment of this Act; or

6 (2) December 19, 1999.

Calendar No. 329

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1744

[Report No. 106–194]

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to

provide that certain species conservation reportsshall continue to be required to be submitted.

OCTOBER 18, 1999

Read twice and placed on the calendar