Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Notices 23235 

Item 

Responses 

(yr) 

(a) 

Filing fee for additional sheets and 

claims 

Average fee 

(b) 

Total non-hour 

cost burden 

(Yr) 

(a) × (b) 

Design Application Size Fee for Each Original New Design Application, filed for each additional 50 sheets that exceeds 100 

sheets—Small Entity.

4 135.00 for each additional 50 sheets 

over 100.

270.00 1,080.00 

Totals ....................................................................................... 252,471 ................................... .......................... 96,203,957.00 

The third chart calculates the 

surcharges and fees incurred when an 

application, the search or examination 

fee, or the oath or declaration is filed 

late, when the application is filed with 

multiple dependent claims, or when the 

application is filed with a non-English 

specification. The USPTO estimates that 

these fees apply to 111,231 of the 

505,721 applications filed per year. This 

chart is a subset of the first chart and 

adds an additional $13,876,905 to the 

annualized (non-hour) costs; however, it 

does not change the number of 

responses. Except for the fee for the 

non-English specification, these fees are 

also determined by the filing status. 

Plant applications are not filed with 

multiple dependent claims so they are 

not included in this chart. 

Item Responses (yr) 

(a) 

Surcharge fee 

for late filing, 

multiple dependent claims, 

or non-english 

specification 

fees 

Total 

non-hour cost 

burden 

(yr) 

(a) × (b) 

Surcharge for Late Filing of Provisional Application for Patent Cover Sheets—Other Entity 2,588 $50.00 $129,400.00 

Surcharge for Late Filing of Provisional Application for Patent Cover Sheets—Small Entity 4,675 25.00 116,875.00 

Utility Applications, filed with Multiple Dependent Claims—Other Entity .............................. 7,101 390.00 2,769,390.00 

Utility Applications, filed with Multiple Dependent Claims—Small Entity .............................. 2,739 195.00 534,105.00 

Utility Applications, filed with a Surcharge for Late filing, search or examination fee, or 

oath/declaration—Other Entity ........................................................................................... 55,935 130.00 7,271,550.00 

Utility Applications, Filed with a Surcharge for Late Filing, search or examination fee, or 

oath/declaration—Small Entity ........................................................................................... 27,158 65.00 1,765,270.00 

Plant Applications, filed with a Surcharge for Late Filing, Search or Examination Fee, or 

Oath/Declaration—Other Entity .......................................................................................... 172 130.00 22,360.00 

Plant Applications, filed with a Surcharge for Late Filing, Search or Examination Fee, or 

Oath/Declaration—Small Entity .......................................................................................... 83 65.00 5,395.00 

Design Applications, filed with a Surcharge for Late Filing, Search or Examination Fee, or 

Oath/Declaration—Other Entity .......................................................................................... 4,400 130.00 572,000.00 

Design Applications, filed with a Surcharge for Late Filing, Search or Examination Fee, or 

Oath/Declaration—Small Entity .......................................................................................... 2,136 65.00 138,840.00 

Non-English Specification ...................................................................................................... 4,244 130.00 551,720.00 

Totals .............................................................................................................................. 111,231 .......................... 13,876,905.00 

The USPTO estimates that the total 

non-hour respondent cost burden for 

this collection, in the form of capital 

start-up, postage, recordkeeping, and 

drawing costs, in addition to the filing 

fees, is $771,767,698 per year. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: April 27, 2010. 

Susan K. Fawcett, 

Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer, Office of Information 

anagement Services, Data Administration 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10288 Filed 4–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct a 

review to determine whether revocation 

of a countervailing or antidumping duty 

order or termination of an investigation 

suspended under section 704 or 734 of 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
23236 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Notices 

the Act would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

or a countervailable subsidy (as the case 

may be) and of material injury. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for June 

2010 

The following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in June 2010 

and will appear in that month’s Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset 

Reviews. 

Department contact 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland (A–405–803) ...................................................................................... Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Mexico (A–201–834) ....................................................................................... Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Carboxymethylcellulose from the Netherlands (A–421–811) ......................................................................... Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Sweden (A–401–808) ..................................................................................... Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium (A–423–808) (2nd Review) ...................................................... Brandon Farlander, (202) 482–0182. 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Italy (A–475–822) (2nd Review) ............................................................ Brandon Farlander, (202) 482–0182. 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Africa (A–791–805) (2nd Review) ............................................... Brandon Farlander, (202) 482–0182. 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Korea (A–580–831) (2nd Review) ............................................... Brandon Farlander, (202) 482–0182. 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Taiwan (A–583–830) (2nd Review) ....................................................... Brandon Farlander, (202) 482–0182. 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Germany (A–428–825) (2nd Review) ................................... Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Italy (A–475–824) (2nd Review) ........................................... Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Mexico (A–201–822) (2nd Review) ....................................... Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Japan (A–588–845) (2nd Review) ........................................ Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from South Korea (A–580–834) (2nd Review) .............................. Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Taiwan (A–583–831) (2nd Review) ...................................... Dana Mermelstein, (202) 482–1391. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium (C–423–809) (2nd Review) ...................................................... Brandon Farlander, (202) 482–0182. 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Africa (C–791–806) (2nd Review) ............................................... Brandon Farlander, (202) 482–0182. 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from South Korea (C–580–835) (2nd Review) .............................. Brandon Farlander, (202) 482–0182. 

Suspended Investigations 

No Sunset Review of suspended 

investigations is scheduled for initiation 

in June 2010. 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to the Department’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in the 

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3— 

Policies Regarding the Conduct of Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy 

Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998). 

The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews provides further 

information regarding what is required 

of all parties to participate in Sunset 

Reviews. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Please note that if the Department 

receives a Notice of Intent to Participate 

from a member of the domestic industry 

within 15 days of the date of initiation, 

the review will continue. Thereafter, 

any interested party wishing to 

participate in the Sunset Review must 

provide substantive comments in 

response to the notice of initiation no 

later than 30 days after the date of 

initiation. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: April 23, 2010. 

Edward C. Yang, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10246 Filed 4–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4697. 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspension of 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213 of the Department of 

Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) 

regulations, that the Department 

conduct an administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, the 

Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’). We intend to release the CBP 

data under Administrative Protective 

Order (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an 

APO within five days of publication of 

the initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 20 days of publication of the 

initiation Federal Register notice. 

Therefore, we encourage all parties 

interested in commenting on respondent 

selection to submit their APO 

applications on the date of publication 

of the initiation notice, or as soon 

thereafter as possible. The Department 

invites comments regarding the CBP 

data and respondent selection within 10 

calendar days of publication of the 

Federal Register initiation notice. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES