alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the Company

|                                 |  |                                        
|-------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Name:                            |  | State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation:
|                                 |  |                                        
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|LipoGenics, Inc.                 |  | Delaware                               
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|Bionutrics Health Products, Inc. |  | Delaware                               
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|InCon Technologies, Inc.         |  | Delaware                               
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|InCon International, Ltd.        |  | British Virgin Islands                 
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|Nutrition Technology Corporation |  | Nevada                                 
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|Cosmedics, Inc.                  |  | Delaware
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of American Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March
31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and
on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.





|Date:
                                                                                                                  May 13, 2011 | By: /s/ Alvaro Valencia                     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                     | Alvaro Valencia                             
|                                                                                                                                     | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Bray and Overton 

Argued at Norfolk, Virginia 

SHARON B. LANG 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 1491-96-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 FEBRUARY 11, 1997 

JAMES A. LANG 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 

Morris B. Gutterman, Judge Designate 

 Moody E. Stallings (Kevin E. Martin-Gayle; 

Stallings & Richardson, P.C., on brief), for 

appellant. 

 Lorin D. Hay for appellee. 

 Sharon B. Lang (wife) appeals the ruling of the trial court 

awarding her one-half of James A. Lang's (husband) taxable 

retirement income. For the reasons stated, we reverse and 

remand. 

 The parties are fully conversant with the record in the 

cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no 

precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. 

 Prior to divorce, husband and wife reached an agreement on 

spousal support, which was incorporated into the final divorce 

decree. The agreement called for husband to pay wife $1,000 

per month, and for wife to receive, "when the husband elects to 

receive the same and does, in fact, commence receiving the same, 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

fifty percent of twenty years worth of creditable military 

retirement pay . . . ." At the time of the final decree, husband 

was on active duty in the United States Navy. 

 Before husband could retire, he was found unfit for service 

and was medically retired. He began receiving a combination of 

disability compensation in the amount of $2,017 and taxable 

retirement income of $427, totalling $2,444. Wife initiated an 

action to determine the proper amount of support she was to 

receive. 

 The judge ruled that the creditable military retirement pay 

totalled $427, and that wife was to receive half of that amount. 

 We disagree. The agreement allowed wife half of "twenty years 

worth of creditable military retirement pay," when and if husband 

begins receiving it. We find that husband is not receiving 

twenty years of retirement pay, but rather an abbreviated 

retirement pay due to his disability compensation. Because the 

triggering event has not occurred, the spousal support agreed 

upon was not modified. Husband therefore continues to be 

obligated to wife for $1,000 per month. 

 We reverse and remand with instructions to enter an award 

not inconsistent with this opinion. 

 Reversed and

remanded.
|                 |                                                    |                                       |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Title of issue  |  Amounts as towhich registrationis effective  | Names ofexchanges onwhich registered  |
|  N/A       |  N/A                                          |  N/A                             |

|                                                                                                                                 | JOHN PRATOCanadian Consul GeneralCanadian Consulate1251 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, N.Y. 10020 or  |                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                 | GLENN CAMPBELLCanadian Consulate1251 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, N.Y. 10020 Copies to:             |                                                                                            |
| CLARE ISMANDeputy Minister of FinanceMinistry of FinanceProvince of Saskatchewan2350 Albert StreetRegina, SaskatchewanCanada S4P 4A6 |                                                                                                             | JOHN W . WHITECravath, Swaine – MooreWorldwide Plaza825 Eighth AvenueNew York, N.Y. 10019 |

----

|   | Exhibit | (j): | 2011-12 Public Accounts Volume 1 |
|--------|---------|------|---------------------------------------|

----

|   | PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN  |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |                           |   |
|   |                           |   |
|   |                           |   |
|   | ByName:Title:                  | /s/ Rae HaverstockRae HaverstockAssistant Deputy MinisterTreasury and Debt Management DivisionMinistry of Finance |

----

| EXHIBIT | (j): | 2011-12 Public Accounts Volume 1 |
|---------|------|---------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AHL
SERVICES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                       532
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,551
<PP&E>                                          21,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,728
<BONDS>                                          3,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,794
<SALES>                                        276,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,013
<CGS>                                          204,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    385
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,034
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
<FN>
<F1> TAG (EPS - PRIMARY) DENOTES BASIC EPS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6077 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6077

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2018

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     Recognizing the National Comedy Center in Jamestown, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Comedy Center Recognition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER IN JAMESTOWN, NEW YORK.

    (a) Congressional Recognition.--Congress--
            (1) recognizes that the National Comedy Center, located in 
        Jamestown, New York, is the only museum of its kind that exists 
        for the exclusive purpose of celebrating comedy in all its 
        forms; and
            (2) officially designates the National Comedy Center as the 
        National Comedy Center.
    (b) Effect of Recognition.--The National Comedy Center recognized 
in this section is not a unit of the National Park System, and the 
designation shall not be construed to require or permit Federal funds 
to be expended for any purpose related to the Center.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

Phone: 513-533-6825 

Fax: 513-533-6826 

February 24, 2009 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00133 

Ms. Rachel Leiton 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Room C-4511 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as 

required by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(c), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to 

designate a class of employees at the Mallinckrodt Chemical Co., Destrehan Street Plant in St. 

Louis, Missouri, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On January 16, 2009, as provided for 

under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as 

an addition to the SEC: 

All employees of DOE, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors 

who worked in the Uranium Division at the Mallinckrodt Chemical Co., Destrehan Street 

Plant in St. Louis, Missouri, from January 1, 1958 to December 31, 1958, for a number of 

work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this 

employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or 

more other classes of employees included in the SEC. 

This designation became effective on February 15, 2009, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on February 15, 2009, members of this class of employees, 

defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

 Sincerely, 

Larry J. Elliott 

 Director 

 Office of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Connect Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken Waters, Principal Financial and Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 19th day of May, 2011. /s/ Ken Waters Ken Waters, Principal Financial Officer
Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EAGLECRES RESOURCES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Crystal Coranes, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: February 13, 2009
|-----------------------

|By: Name:
Title: | /s/ Crystal Coranes Crystal Coranes
President and principal executive officer
|---------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 158 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 158

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to regulate the manufacture, 
  importation, and sale of ammunition capable of piercing police body 
                                 armor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to regulate the manufacture, 
  importation, and sale of ammunition capable of piercing police body 
                                 armor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Law Enforcement Officers Protection 
Amendment Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF THE DEFINITION OF ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION.

    Section 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (i);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) a projectile that may be used in a 
                        handgun and that the Secretary of the Treasury, 
                        in consultation with the Attorney General 
                        determines, pursuant to section 926(d), to be 
                        capable of penetrating body armor.''.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF ARMOR PIERCING CAPABILITY OF PROJECTILES.

    Section 926 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d) Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 
subsection, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations based on 
standards to be developed by the Secretary of the Treasury, in 
consultation with the Attorney General, for the uniform testing of 
projectiles to determine whether such projectiles are capable of 
penetrating National Institute of Justice Level II-A body armor.''.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary for the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General 
to--
            (1) develop and implement performance standards for armor 
        piercing ammunition; and
            (2) promulgate regulations for performance standards for 
        armor piercing ammunition.
                                 <all>
```
463 A.2d 34

#### Commonwealth v. Strickler, Appellant.

Submitted April 5, 1983.

David Zwanetz, for appellant; Jane Cutler Greenspan, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, WIEAND and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Order affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 4940** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ANTHONY SHON SINGLETARY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Thomas D. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cr - 00074

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : July 28, 2014 Decided: August 1, 2014

Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, John A. Dusenbury, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley R and, United States Attorney, JoA nna G. McFadden, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensbor o, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Shon Singletary pleaded guilty to possessi on of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (2012 ) , and was sentenced to fifty

- seven months’ imprisonment
. Singletary appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court erred in applying a four

- level enhancement for possession of a firearm in connection with another felony offense under U.S. Sentenci ng Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) (2012). We affirm. In reviewing the district court’s application of a
S entencing Guideline, we review its legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error. United States v. Strieper , 666 F. 3d 288, 292 (4th Cir. 2012). An enhancement under USSG § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) is appropriate when a firearm possessed by a defendant “facilitated, or had the potential of facilitating, another felony offense.” USSG § 2K2.1 cmt. n.14(A). The requirement that t he firearm be possessed “in connection with” another felony “is satisfied if the firearm had some purpose or effect with respect to the other offense,” such as to protect or embolden the actor. United States v. McKenzie

Gude , 671 F.3d 452, 464 (4th Cir. 2 011) (internal quotation marks omitted). However, “the requirement is not satisfied if the firearm was present due to mere accident or coincidence.” United States v. Jenkins , 566 F.3d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 2009)3 (internal quotation marks omitted). The Guid elines commentary specifically provides that a defendant possesses a firearm in connection with another felony “in the case of a drug trafficking offense in which a firearm is found in close proximity to drugs, . . . because the presence of the firearm has the potential of facilitating [the drug

- trafficking] felony offense.” USSG § 2K2.1 cmt. n.14(B). On appeal, Singletary argues that his simultaneous possession of the firearm and the drugs found in his residence was merely coincidental. Because the re cord was adequate to support a contrary finding, however, we conclude the district court did not err in imposing the enhancement. Accordingly, we affirm Singletary’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad equately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1595

To designate the United States courthouse at 401 West Washington Street

in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ‘‘Sandra Day O’Connor United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 16, 1999

Mr. KYL (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse at 401 West

Washington Street in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ‘‘Sandra

Day O’Connor United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR

4 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

5 The United States courthouse at 401 West Wash6 ington Street in Phoenix, Arizona, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Sandra Day O’Connor United States

8 Courthouse’’.
2

•S 1595 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Sandra Day O’Connor United

6 States Courthouse’’.

Æ