alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1595 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1595

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States courthouse at 401 West Washington Street 
    in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ``Sandra Day O'Connor United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse at 401 West Washington Street in 
Phoenix, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the ``Sandra Day 
O'Connor United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sandra Day 
O'Connor United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report
of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Saagar Govil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | /s/ Renato Dela Rama.           | 
| | ------------------------------- | 
| | Renato Dela Rama                | 
| | Vice President of Finance       | 
| | and Principal Financial Officer | 



Dated: April
29, 2014





22
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7830
FRANK O'NEAL JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FLOYD R. FRAZIER, Major; JEFFREY W. FRAZIER, Captain; RAYMOND ROSSENER, Lieutenant; CRIT BARTLEY, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-499-R) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank O'Neal Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. George Harrison Gilliam, GILLIAM, SCOTT & KRONER, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The magistrate judge conducted the proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. * We have reviewedthe record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Johnson v. Frazier , No. CA-94-499-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6999

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BERNARD GIBSON, SR., a/k/a Bernard Willis,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:94-cr-00454-PJM-2)

Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 20, 2018

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Gibson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Gibson, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 

36 motion asking the district court to remove from the amended criminal judgment 

against him any reference to supervised release. Rule 36 only allows for the correction of 

clerical errors and not the type of substantive relief Gibson seeks. See United States v. 

Powell, 266 F. App’x 263, 266 (4th Cir. 2008) (argued but unpublished). We thus affirm 

the district court’s order. See United States v. Gibson, No. 8:94-cr-01388-454-PJM-2

(D. Md. filed July 27, 2018 & entered Aug. 1, 2018). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31  Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 302)  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Steve Bergstrom, certify that:   (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Silver Hill Mines, Inc., (ARegistrant@).  (2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  (4) The registrant=s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant=s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  (5) The registrant=s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant=s auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant=s internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 12, 2009   By: /s/ Steve Bergstrom Steve Bergstrom Title: President, CEO/CFO
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**1350
      Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial
      Officer**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with
      the report of Med-Emerg International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
      the
      period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Ramesh Zacharias Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      my knowledge:








1)     
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)     
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated: November
                30, 2005By:
                /s/ Dr.
                Ramesh ZachariasName:
                Dr.
                Ramesh ZachariasTitle:
                Chief
                Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00050-CV

IN RE ISABEL MIRIAM BLANES 

RUIZ

RELATOR

----------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 067-294263-17

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and KERR, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 15, 2018

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
**ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME** 

**TO FILE APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF Page**  **1**

**IN THE SUPREME**  **COURT OF THE**  **STATE OF MONTANA**

**Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22**  **- 0729**  JAMIE NORRIS ,

Plaint iff /A ppellant , v. RICK L. OLSEN dba A&O SHEET METAL ,

Defendant/Respondent

. **ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S**  **MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO**  **FILE APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF** 

Having reviewed A

ppellant Jamie Norris ’ s Unopposed Motion fo r Extension of T ime to File Appellant’s Opening Brief and good cause appearing therefrom, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s mo ti on is GRANTED and his opening br ie f shall be filed no later than April 21, 2023.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 22 2023

03/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0729
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# Agency Holding Meeting: 

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# Date and Time: 

12 p.m., Thursday, January 21, 2010.

# Place: 

U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters Considered: 

The following matter will be considered during the closed meeting:

Consideration of two original jurisdiction cases pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

# Agency Contact: 

Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.

      ( print page 3491)    
Dated: January 12, 2010.

Rockne Chickinell,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-1025 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION  906  CERTIFICATION:



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO 18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350
ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002



Certification  of  CEO

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Sentry Technology Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I,
Peter  L.  Murdoch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
        15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
        Company.



                           /s/  PETER  L.  MURDOCH
                          -------------------------------------------------
                          Peter  L.  Murdoch
                          President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

                          April  11,  2008


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version  of  this     written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained  by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.

This  certification  accompanies  this Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and shall not, except to the extent
required  by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  (the "Exchange Act").  Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent  that  the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it  by  reference.
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
  I, David
Lichtenstein, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”)
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:
 
 (1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m); and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ David
      Lichtenstein
 David
      Lichtenstein
 Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal
      Executive Officer)
 November
      15, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 25199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10601]



[[Page 25199]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests Resource Advisory 
Committee will meet in Redmond, Oregon. The purpose of the meeting is 
to review proposed projects and make recommendations under Title II 
(division C of Pub. L. 10-343 reauthorized and amended the Secure rural 
Schools and community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (SRS Act) as 
originally enacted in Public Law 106-393.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 12, 2010 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the office of the Central Oregon 
Intergovernmental Council, 2363 SW. Glacier Place, Redmond, Oregon 
97756. Send written comments to Jeff Walter as Designated Federal 
Official, for the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests Resource 
Advisory Committee, c/o Forest Service, USDA, Ochoco National Forest, 
3160 NE. 3rd St., Prineville, OR 97754 or electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bed4c9dfd2cadbccfed8cd90d8dbda90cbcd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cf6ebfdf0e8f9eedcfaefb2faf9f8b2e9ef">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Walter, Designated Federal 
Official, Ochoco National Forest, 541-416-6625.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring Title II matters to the attention of 
the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff 
before the meeting. A public input session will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by May 10, 2010 will have the 
opportunity to address the Committee at the session.

    Dated: April 28, 2010.
Jeff Walter,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2010-10601 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50139

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIA DEL CARMEN HERNANDEZ-AGUIRRE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-752-ALL

Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Maria Del Carmen Hernandez-Aguirre (Hernandez) appeals her sentence

for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. She contends

that the 46-month sentence imposed was unreasonable because it was greater

than necessary to meet the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Specifically,

Hernandez argues that the sentence failed to account for the fact that her prior

felony drug trafficking offense occurred when she was a teenager, this was her

only prior offense, she entered the United States to see her eight-year old

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 28, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50139

2

daughter, and she was not a danger to the public or likely to commit future

crimes.

Where the district court exercises its discretion to impose a sentence

within a properly calculated guideline range, the sentence is presumptively

reasonable, and this court may infer that the district court considered all the

factors for a fair sentence set forth in the Guidelines. See Rita v. United States,

127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-70 (2007); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th

Cir. 2006). Here, the record reflects that the district court considered

Hernandez’s arguments, the recommendations of the presentence report, the

applicable guideline range, and the § 3553(a) factors. Hernandez has failed to

demonstrate that the district court clearly erred in exercising its broad

sentencing discretion by imposing a sentence that failed to account for

sentencing factors entitled to significant weight, gave significant weight to

improper or irrelevant factors, or represented a clear error of judgment in

balancing the sentencing factors. See United States v. Nikonova, 480 F.3d 371,

376 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 163 (2007).

In light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Hernandez

challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and

aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the

offense that must be found by a jury. This court has held that this issue is “fully

foreclosed from further debate.” United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d

624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, Douglas R. Young, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of NeoMagic Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeoMagic Corporation. This written statement isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to NeoMagic and will be retained by NeoMagic and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request. 

 

Date: October 27,2006 

 

By: /s/ Douglas R.Young            

Name: Douglas R. Young 

Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.48    Date:
  
  November 1, 2008To:
  
  Viraj
  PatelFrom:
  
  Peter
  BlackmoreCc:
  
  Mark GreenSubject:
  
  Special Bonus  I want to thank you for
your contributions to UTStarcom and acknowledge you as an integral member of
the senior management team.  In recognition of
your ongoing commitment to UTStarcom you are eligible to receive a bonus in the
amount of $100,000, payable at the end of Q1 2009 subject to achieving the
objectives outlined below and sustaining the performance requirements of your
position.   The bonus is designed to
reward performance and support achievement of the following objectives:  1.Fulfill
Interim CFO role  2.Successful
completion and on-time filing of the 10K  3.Implement
Finance Transformation Plan as agreed to by CEO and Interim CFO  Equity  Additionally, I am
pleased to let you know that you will receive 100% distribution of the 60,000 performance
RSUs that were approved in February 2008. These RSUs will vest 50% in February 2009
and the remaining 50% in February 2010.  Thank you for your
dedication and hard work.