alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo** 

________________________ No. 07 - 12 - 00476 - CR

________________________ JOE DANIEL LUNA , APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 24 2nd District Court Hale County, Texas Tri a l Court No. B19083 - 1203 , Honorable Edward L. Self , Presiding 

### July 11 , 2013 ORDER ON MOTION FOR REASONABLE BAIL

Before QUI NN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK , JJ. By opinion dated May 28, 2013, this Court reformed the trial court’s judgment of conviction for a third degree felony assault to misdemeanor assault. That portion of the judgment assessing punishment was reversed and the cause was remanded to the trial co urt for a new punishment hearing. Pending before us is appellant’s motion for reasonable bail. Pursuant to our request, the State filed a response by which it does not oppose bail being set. We grant appellant’s motion.2 Article 44.04(h) of the Texas C ode of Criminal Procedure provides that upon reversal of a conviction, a defendant is entitled to release on reasonable bail, regardless of the length of term of imprisonment, pending final determination of the appeal by the State or defendant on petition for discretionary review. The statute further provides this Court shall determine the amount of bail if it is requested before a petition for discretionary review has been filed. It appearing that appellant is entitled to the relief requested, pursuant t o article 44.04(h), the Court hereby sets reasonable bail in the amount of $5 ,000, conditioned as the law requires. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              METRIKA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                            Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<S>                                                                        <C>                 <C>

As of February 28, 1999, Metrika Systems Corporation owned the following
companies:
                                                                               STATE OR
                                                                             JURISDICTION      PERCENT OF
                                   NAME                                           OF           OWNERSHIP
                                                                             INCORPORATION
           Radiometrie RM GmbH                                              Germany               100
           Eberline Radiometrie S.A.                                        France                100
           Gamma-Metrics                                                    California            100
           MF Physics Corporation                                           Delaware              100
           Radiometrie Corporation                                          Delaware              100
                DMC Mess & Regeltechnik GmbH                                Germany               100
           Radiometrie U.S.A., Inc.                                         California            100
           Radiometrie Limited                                              United Kingdom        100

</TABLE>
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 



Third Amendment


to


Employment Agreement







This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Second Amendment”), is being entered into effective December 14, 2015 by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Mr. David Harding (the “Executive”).


                    


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2013 and subsequently amended on November 1, 2013 and January 9, 2015 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Executive continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and


 


WHEREAS, in consideration of the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present intent of the Company and the Executive.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the Employment Agreement, the parties do hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:








	
1.

	
Section “3. Term of Agreement” strike the language “continue until December 31, 2015” and replace it with “continue until December 31, 2016”.







 



	
2.

	
Except as expressly amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall continue and be in full force in all respects.



























/s/ Wayne Wetherell                                                                /s/ David Harding


ImageWare Systems, Inc.                                                        David Harding
Exhibit 10 (a)

          Consent of Jorden Burt Boros Cicchetti Berenson & Johnson LLP

<PAGE>

                             [JordenBurt Letterhead]

                                February 13, 2001

AIG Life Insurance Company
One Alico Plaza
600 King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal
Counsel" in the Statement of Additional Information contained in pre-effective
amendment no. 2 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (File Nos. 811-5301
and 333-49128) filed by AIG Life Insurance Company and Variable Account I with
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940.

                        Very truly yours,


                        /s/ Jorden Burt Boros Cicchetti Berenson & Johnson LLP

                        Jorden Burt Boros Cicchetti Berenson & Johnson LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1550 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1550

To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization demonstration 
                               projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 1999

 Mr. Wellstone introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization demonstration 
                               projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Community Nursing 
Demonstration Extension Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN MEDICARE COMMUNITY NURSING ORGANIZATION 
              DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law and in addition to the 
extension provided under section 4019 of the Balanced Budget Act of 
1997, demonstration projects conducted under section 4079 of the 
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 shall be conducted for an 
additional period of 3 years, and the deadline for any report required 
relating to the results of such projects shall be not later than 6 
months before the end of such additional period.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING II, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                    DECEMBER 29, 2000                  DECEMBER 31, 1999                  DECEMBER 25, 1998
                          ----------------------------------  ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                            MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                              PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED        PREFERRED         PREFERRED        PREFERRED
                          CAPITAL TRUST II  FUNDING II, L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST II FUNDING II, L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST II FUNDING II, L.P.
                          ----------------  ----------------  ---------------- ----------------  ---------------- ----------------

<S>                        <C>                <C>                <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>

Earnings                         $ 24,742          $ 29,028            $ 24,742        $ 29,003           $ 24,742        $ 29,017
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========           ========        ========


Fixed charges                    $      -          $      -            $      -        $      -           $      -        $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution requirements         24,000            24,742              24,000          24,742             24,000          24,742
                                 --------          --------            --------        --------           --------        --------

Total combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements       $ 24,000          $ 24,742            $ 24,000        $ 24,742           $ 24,000        $ 24,742
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========           ========        ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                        1.03              1.17                1.03            1.17               1.03            1.17
</TABLE>
Order entered August 25, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00432-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF FRILEY S. DAVIDSON, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-09-3999-1

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s August 13, 2015 motion to dismiss the appeal or, in the 

alternative, submit the appeal without the reporter’s record and appellant’s August 24, 2015 

response. On June 4, 2015, the court reporter filed a letter stating that she had received neither a 

request nor payment for the reporter’s record. On that same date, this Court notified appellant by 

letter to provide, within ten days, notice that appellant had requested preparation of the reporter’s 

record and written verification that appellant has paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s 

fee or written documentation that appellant has been found to be entitled to proceed without 

payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if we did not receive the requested documentation 

within the time specified, the Court may order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). In his response to appellee’s motion, appellant asks the Court to 

allow him the opportunity to request and pay for the reporter’s record. 
We DENY appellee’s motion. On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER appellant to file, 

by SEPTEMBER 4, 2015, documentation showing that he has requested and paid or made 

arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee. We caution appellant that if the Court does not receive 

the required documentation within the time specified, we will order the appeal submitted without 

the reporter’s record. 

If payment for the reporter’s record is made, Jackie Galindo, Official Court Reporter for 

the Probate Court No. 1, shall file the reporter’s record by SEPTEMBER 24, 2015.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to Ms. Galindo and all counsel of record.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50286 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SHARON LYNN POSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-187-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Sharon Lynn Posey has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Posey has filed a response. She has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Our independent review of the brief, Posey’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.No. 05-50286 -2- See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Posey’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Imperial Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   November 17, 2010





By:
/s/ James PayyappillyJames Payyappilly, President, Chief Executive

Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)By:
/s/ Josey SajanJosey Sajan, Chief Financial Officer, Chief

Accounting Officer, Secretary and Director

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal AccountingOfficer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Forbes Energy Services Ltd. filed on Form 10-Q (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Crisp, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ L. Melvin CooperL. Melvin CooperSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary


Date: August 14, 2009
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated December 29, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-207283) of Smart Trust,
Tax-Advantaged Growth & Income Trust, Series 9.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 29, 2015
----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: March 8, 2011 |              |                                                                     |
|----------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |              |                                                                     |
|                 | /s/ Mary T. Minch |
|                 | Name:             | Mary T. Minch                                                            |
|                 | Title:            | Executive Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-4514

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDWARD WASHINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:11-cr-00388-TDS-1)

Submitted: December 5, 2012 Decided: December 13, 2012

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, John A. Dusenbury, Jr., 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Stephen T. 

Inman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Edward Washington appeals his sentence of ten months’ 

imprisonment after pleading guilty pursuant to a plea agreement 

to the theft of Government funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 641 (2006). Washington challenges only the substantive 

reasonableness of his sentence. We affirm.

We review the substantive reasonableness of a sentence

using the abuse-of-discretion standard. Gall v. United States, 

552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v. Lynn, 592 F.3d 572, 575 

(4th Cir. 2010). A sentence below the applicable Guidelines 

range is presumptively reasonable. United States v. Susi, 674 

F.3d 278, 289 (4th Cir. 2012). Such presumption is rebutted 

only by a showing that the sentence is unreasonable when 

measured against the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors. United 

States v. Montes-Pineda, 445 F.3d 375, 379 (4th Cir. 2006). 

Washington has failed to overcome the presumption of

reasonableness. Washington received a sentence below the

applicable Guidelines range. The district court thoroughly 

explained its selected sentence, citing the lengthy period 

during which Washington’s crime was ongoing and the need for 

deterrence. We conclude that the district court did not abuse 

its discretion in selecting the sentence.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. (the
Corporation) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William R. Fatt, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Corporation.

| |                                                                            
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ William R. Fatt                                                        
| |                                                                            
| | Name: William R. Fatt
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:   May 15, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6029 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6029

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2018

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
reauthorize the comprehensive opioid abuse grant program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reauthorizing and Extending Grants 
for Recovery from Opioid Use Programs Act of 2018'' or the ``REGROUP 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE OPIOID ABUSE GRANT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1001(a)(27) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 
Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10261(a)(27)) is amended by striking ``through 
2021'' and inserting ``and 2018, and $330,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2019 through 2023''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```