alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     I hereby certify that the accompanying Report of MidWestOne Financial
Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.


/s/ Charles S. Howard
---------------------
Charles S. Howard
Chairman, President &
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1532 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1532

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to restrict the sale or other 
transfer of armor piercing ammunition and components of armor piercing 
                  ammunition disposed of by the Army.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 1999

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Levin, Mr. Schumer, and Mr. Moynihan) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to restrict the sale or other 
transfer of armor piercing ammunition and components of armor piercing 
                  ammunition disposed of by the Army.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Armor Piercing Ammunition 
Resale Limitation Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. RESALE OF ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION DISPOSED OF BY THE ARMY.

    (a) Restriction.--(1) Chapter 443 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 4688. Armor piercing ammunition and components: condition on 
              disposal
    ``(a) Limitation on Resale or Other Transfer.--Whenever the 
Secretary of the Army carries out a disposal (by sale or otherwise) of 
armor piercing ammunition, or a component of armor piercing ammunition, 
the Secretary shall require as a condition of the disposal that the 
recipient agree in writing not to sell or otherwise transfer any of the 
ammunition (reconditioned or otherwise), or any component of that 
ammunition, to any purchaser in the United States other than a law 
enforcement or other governmental agency.
    ``(b) Definition.--In this section, the term `armor piercing 
ammunition' means a center-fire cartridge the military designation of 
which includes the term `armor penetrator' or `armor piercing', 
including a center-fire cartridge designated as armor piercing 
incendiary (API) or armor-piercing incendiary-tracer (API-T).''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``4688. Armor piercing ammunition and components: condition on 
                            disposal.''.
    (b) Applicability.--Section 4688 of title 10, United States Code 
(as added by subsection (a)), shall apply with respect to any disposal 
of ammunition or components referred to in that section after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
onForm10-Q for the period endedOctober31, 2009 of the MacroShares Major Metro
Housing Up Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "QuarterlyReport"), I, John A. Flanagan, principal
financial officer of MacroShares HousingDepositor, LLC, which acts as the
depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.
            The Quarterly Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
            The information contained in the
      Quarterly Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.






Date:December 15, 2009




By:
            /s/John A.
      FlanaganJohn A.
      Flanagan
              Chief Financial Officer of
      Depositor,
              on behalf of
      Registrant
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARL ANTONIO ALMON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-98-1194; CA-02-217-9-8)

Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 22, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Antonio Almon, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Duane,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Carl Antonio Almon, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Almon has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999             DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1999             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999             DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                           3,069                   3,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,898                   1,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,099                  34,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,269                  44,269
<PP&E>                                          15,770                  15,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,257                   6,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,185                  60,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,147                  37,147
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            70                      70
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,480                  21,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,185                  60,185
<SALES>                                         33,491                 114,758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,491                 114,758
<CGS>                                           21,840                  64,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,455                  46,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,998                  18,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 351                   1,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,153)                (16,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,088)                 (5,187)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,065)                (11,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,065)                (11,120)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.31)                  (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.31)                  (1.62)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.6

[CONCORD EFS, INC. LETTERHEAD]

September 11, 2002

Mr. Richard Buchignani
6065 River Oaks Cove
Memphis, TN 38120

Dear Richard:

I am pleased to confirm our offer of employment as Vice Chairman and General
Counsel of Concord EFS, Inc. Your salary will be $275,000 annualized. In
addition to your salary, the following compensation stipulations also apply:

BONUS: You are eligible to participate in Concords Annual Bonus Program
consistent with members of the Executive Management Staff.

STOCK OPTIONS: You will be granted 25,000 stock options effective October 4,
2002 and will be eligible to participate in the Concord Stock Option Plan as
outlined in the Concord EFS, Inc. 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended,
subject in all respects to the terms of the Plan and the Option Agreement
evidencing this grant.

BENEFITS: You are eligible to participate in our healthcare plan (to include
health, disability, and term life), our 401(k) plan, and our Senior Executive
Retirement Savings Plan.

Upon termination, death, disability, change of control, or change of position or
location, Concord will pay one years salary to your or your designated
beneficiary(s). Options will continue to vest during the one-year period.

Concord will also pay for professional organization dues, CLE, seminars, and
other customary expenses related to your position.

If you are in agreement with the terms of this offer, please acknowledge your
acceptance by signing in the space provided below and return one copy to me.

Richard, I am looking forward to welcoming you to Concord as a member of our
Executive Management Team.

Sincerely,

/s/ Dan M. Palmer

Dan M. Palmer
Chairman and CEO

| |  |                           |  |        
| |  | ------------------------- |  | -------
| |  | /s/ J. Richard Buchignani |  | 9/18/02
| |  |                           |  |        
| |  | Richard Buchignani        |  | Date   

JMF/kw
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           MAHASKA INVESTMENT COMPANY
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED               SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                     JUNE 30                         JUNE 30
                                            --------------------------      --------------------------
                                               1999            1998            1999            1998
                                               ----            ----            ----            ----
<S>                                         <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION:
Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding during the year.............   3,652,376       3,680,490       3,644,405       3,676,858
Weighted number of shares outstanding
  during the year outstanding during the
  year including all dilutive potential
  shares..................................   3,728,534       3,874,962       3,743,010       3,880,760
Net earnings..............................  $ (319,172)     $1,374,130      $  838,072      $2,803,677
Earnings per share -- basic...............  $    (0.09)     $     0.37      $     0.23      $     0.76
Earnings per share -- diluted.............  $    (0.09)     $     0.35      $     0.22      $     0.72
</TABLE>

                                  Page 18 of 19
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TONY B. ALEXANDER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:18

- cr - 00202

- MOC

- DSC

- 1 )

Submitted : August 18, 2021 Decided: October 12, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tony B

. Alexander appeals the district court’s orders affirming the magistrate judge’s order directing that Alexander be detained pending resolution of a supervised release revocation petition, and denying his motion for reconsideration. * We have reviewed the record and find no rever sible error. See United States v. Clark , 865 F.2d 1433, 1437 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Alexander , No. 3:18

- cr - 00202

- MOC

- DSC

- 1 ( W.D.N.C. Mar. 31,
2021 & Apr. 13, 2021)

. We disp ense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction to review the district court order s pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c).
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States
Code,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Michael T. Kennedy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Radnor Holdings
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 13, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael T. Kennedy               
|                      |  |  |  | Michael T. Kennedy                   
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 333-56829, No. 333-89465, No. 333-108119 and No. 333-144440 on Form S-8, and Registration Statements No. 333-113930 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 9, 2009 which expressesan unqualified opinion relating to the consolidated financial statements of CuraGen Corporation and the effectiveness of CuraGen Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CuraGenCorporation for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Hartford, Connecticut 

March 9, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25234-25235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-1089-000]


EquiPower Resources Management, LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

April 29, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
EquiPower Resources Management, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate

[[Page 25235]]

tariff, noting that such application includes a request for blanket 
authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities 
and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 19, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d7b786f7e7253515453586e484d4d524f497d5b584f5e135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bef8fbecfdf1d0d2d7d0dbedcbceced1cccafed8dbccdd90d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10803 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Craig H. Muhlhauser, certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F
of Celestica Inc.;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  4.     The companys other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this
report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.     The companys other certifying officer and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the
companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date:March 25, 2008  /s/ Craig MuhlhauserCraig H. MuhlhauserChief Executive Officer