alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of
Sweetwater Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended September
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Jaiju  Makiakal, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.














Jaiju
Makiakal


Chief
Accounting Officer


Chief
Financial Officer and Director











-1-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NATIONWIDE
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.'S AND ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2000, AND IS QUAILFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            15,497
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         150
<MORTGAGE>                                       6,168
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      311
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  23,359
<CASH>                                              63
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,179
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 22,243
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    417
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              300
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,179
<PREMIUMS>                                         240
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,668
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                (25)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     195
<BENEFITS>                                       1,426
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        352
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    624
<INCOME-TAX>                                       189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       435
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.38
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Universal Acquisitions Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anna Lo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anna LoAnna
      LoPrincipal
      Executive OfficerMay
      20,
2009
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Glacier Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 /s/ William Tay
                                 ----------------------------
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: October 27, 2009
|                 | (1)                          | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|----------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |
|                 | (2)                          | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                 |
|                 |
| Date: August 7, 2009 | By: /s/ Thomas G. Archbold   |
|                 | Thomas G. Archbold           |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |
|                 |
|                 |
|                 |
|                 |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 84 (Monday, May 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 23227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service


Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), today 
accepted a petition, and began a review of a petition, for trade 
adjustment assistance by the North Carolina Commercial Flower Growers 
Association on behalf of cut lily producers in Georgia, North Carolina, 
South Carolina, and Virginia. The Administrator will determine within 
40 days whether or not increasing imports of lilies contributed 
importantly to a greater than 15 percent decrease in cash receipts for 
lilies compared to the average of the 3 preceding marketing years. If a 
determination is affirmative, producers who produce and market cut 
lilies in Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia will be 
eligible to apply to the Farm Service Agency for technical assistance 
at no cost and cash benefits.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trade Adjustment Assistance Staff, 
FAS, USDA, at (202) 720-0638, or by e-mail at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#76020417121317121c0305021b13180236101705580305121758111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="01757360656460656b7472756c646f75416760722f747265602f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>. Additional program information can be 
obtained at the Web site for the Trade Adjustment Assistance for 
Farmers program. The URL is http://www.fas.usda.gov/itp/taa.

    Dated: April 27, 2010.
John D. Brewer,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-10265 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1595 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1595

To designate the United States courthouse at 401 West Washington Street 
    in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ``Sandra Day O'Connor United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 1999

  Mr. Kyl (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse at 401 West Washington Street 
    in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ``Sandra Day O'Connor United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse at 401 West Washington Street in 
Phoenix, Arizona, shall be known and designated as the ``Sandra Day 
O'Connor United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sandra Day 
O'Connor United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, each of
the undersigned, John W. Bordelon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph B. Zanco, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods covered in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    JOHN W.
BORDELON                             
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | John W. Bordelon                                    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    JOSEPH B.
ZANCO                              
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Joseph B. Zanco                                     
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



|Note: | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Home Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 151

To amend the International Maritime Satellite Telecommunications Act to

ensure the continuing provision of certain global satellite safety services

after the privatization of the business operations of the International

Mobile Satellite Organization, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. SARBANES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the International Maritime Satellite Telecommunications Act to ensure the continuing provision of certain

global satellite safety services after the privatization of

the business operations of the International Mobile Satellite Organization, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 151 IS

1 SECTION 1. CONTINUING PROVISION OF GLOBAL SAT2 ELLITE SAFETY SERVICES AFTER PRIVATIZA3 TION OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS OF INTER4 NATIONAL MOBILE SATELLITE ORGANIZA5 TION.

6 (a) AUTHORITY.—The International Maritime Sat7 ellite Telecommunications Act (47 U.S.C. 751 et seq.) is

8 amended by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘GLOBAL SATELLITE SAFETY SERVICES AFTER

10 PRIVATIZATION OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS OF INMARSAT

11 ‘‘SEC. 506. In order to ensure the continued provision

12 of global maritime distress and safety satellite tele13 communications services after the privatization of the

14 business operations of INMARSAT, the President may

15 maintain on behalf of the United States membership in

16 the International Mobile Satellite Organization.’’.

17 (b) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—

18 (1) REPEAL.—That Act is further amended by

19 striking sections 502, 503, 504, and 505 (47 U.S.C.

20 751, 752, 753, and 757).

21 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

22 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date on

23 which the International Mobile Satellite Organiza24 tion ceases to operate directly a global mobile sat25 ellite system.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1676]

                        Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-                              ( print page 24572)                            Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:                    

The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered the application (filed 03/17/2010) submitted by the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 243, requesting reissuance of the grant of authority for said zone to the City of Victorville, which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest.

Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the City of Victorville as the new grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 243, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28. The Secretary of Commerce, as Chairman of the Board, is hereby authorized to issue an appropriate Board Order.

                    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th                     day of April 2010.                

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration Alternate ChairmanForeign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-10621 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to
the best of our knowledge, this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, of CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-IV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the
financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in this quarterly
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the small business issuer.

|             |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-IV LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                   
|------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                               
|             |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                     
|             |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                              
|May 12, 2004 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                           
|DATE         |  | William B. Dockser,
                  Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)
|May 12, 2004 |  | by:  /s/ Michael J. Tuszka                                                                                                                            
|DATE         |  | Michael J. Tuszka,
                  Vice President
                  and Chief Accounting Officer
                  (Principal Financial Officer)    

This
certification accompanies this quarterly report and is made solely for purpose of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not
for any other purpose, and shall not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SERGEI KOVALEV,

Petitioner

v.

IRINA STEPANSKY, DMD; JOHN DOE; HEALTH PARTNERS PLANS, INC.; WILLIAM S. GEORGE; AVESIS INCORPORATED; CHRIS SWANKER,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 51 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of June, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### October 9, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
TRAVIS HODSON, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents - Appellees. No. 15-1182 (D.C. No. 1:14-CV-02879-LTB) (D. Colorado)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

BeforeMATHESON , MURPHY, and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on Travis Hodson’s pro se request for a certificate of appealability (“COA”). This appeal had its genesis in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition Hodson filed in federal district court on October 22, 2014. On February 6, 2015, the district court dismissed Hodson’s habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction, concluding Hodson was not “in custody” on the conviction he was attempting to challenge. See McCormick v. Kline , 572 F.3d 841, 847-48 (10th Cir. 2009) (“The first showing a § 2254 petitioner must make is that he is in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. . . . Section 2254’s in-custodyrequirement is jurisdictional.” (quotations and citations omitted)). This court dismissed Hodson’s appeal from that ruling as untimely. Hodson v. Colo. Mental Health Inst. , No. 15-1101 (10th Cir. May 29, 2015). In the meantime, Hodson filed in the district court a “Motion for Relief From Judgment” pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). The district court denied that motion, concluding Hodson had failed to come forward with any reason to doubt the previous jurisdictional ruling. Hodson seeks a COA so he can appeal the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion. Spitznas v. Boone , 464 F.3d 1213, 1217-18 (10th Cir. 2006) (holding that when a district court denies a “true” 60(b) motion, this court “will require the movant to obtain a [COA] before proceeding with his . . . appeal”). This court denies Hodson’s request for a COA because the district court’s conclusion that Hodson was not in custody is not reasonably subject to debate. A COA will issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the decision appealed from involves a procedural ruling, this court will not issue a COA unless “the prisoner shows, at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Spitznas , 464 F.3d at 1225 (quotation omitted). Because Hodson has failed to cast any doubt whatsoever on the district court’s “in custody” determination, he is not entitled to a COA.
-2-For those reasons set out above, this appeal is hereby dismissed

. Furthermore, because Hodson has not advanced a “reasoned, nonfrivolous argument” on appeal, see Lister v. Dep’t of the Treasury , 408 F.3d 1309, 1312 (10th Cir. 2005), his request to proceed in forma pauperisis also denied

.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge

-3-