alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1569

AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate

segments of the Taunton River in the Commonwealth

of Massachusetts for study for potential addition to the

National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taunton River Wild

5 and Scenic River Study Act of 1999’’.
2

S 1569 ES

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 Congress finds that—

3 (1) the Taunton River in the State of Massa4 chusetts possesses important resource values (includ5 ing wildlife, ecological, and scenic values), historic

6 sites, and a cultural past important to the heritage

7 of the United States;

8 (2) there is strong support among State and

9 local officials, area residents, and river users for a

10 cooperative wild and scenic river study of the area;

11 and

12 (3) there is a longstanding interest among

13 State and local officials, area residents, and river

14 users in undertaking a concerted cooperative effort

15 to manage the river in a productive and meaningful

16 way.

17 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY.

18 Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

19 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended—

20 (1) by designating the undesignated paragraph

21 following (135) as paragraph (136); and

22 (2) by adding at the end the following:

23 ‘‘(137) TAUNTON RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.—

24 The segment downstream from the headwaters, from

25 the confluence of the Town River and the Matfield
3

S 1569 ES

1 River in Bridgewater to the confluence with the

2 Forge River in Raynham, Massachusetts.’’.

3 SEC. 4. STUDY AND REPORT.

4 Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

5 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating the second paragraph (8)

7 as paragraph (10);

8 (2) by redesignating the second paragraph (11)

9 as paragraph (12);

10 (3) by redesignating the third paragraph (11)

11 as paragraph (13);

12 (4) by redesignating the fourth paragraph (11)

13 as paragraph (14);

14 (5) by redesignating the first undesignated

15 paragraph as paragraph (15);

16 (6) by redesignating the second undesignated

17 paragraph as paragraph (16); and

18 (7) by adding at the end the following:

19 ‘‘(17) TAUNTON RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.—Not

20 later than 3 years after the date of enactment of

21 this paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior—

22 ‘‘(A) shall complete the study of the Taun23 ton River, Massachusetts; and

24 ‘‘(B) shall submit to Congress a report de25 scribing the results of the study.’’.
4

S 1569 ES

1 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

3 as are necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1569

AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the Taunton River in the

Commonwealth of Massachusetts for study forpotential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

137812 (23) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

KEITH LARON DOBBINS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137812 

 COA: 285604 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $19.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$356.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 15, 2008 

Clerk
(November 2, 1909.)

#### In re E. F. WALTON, Application for Habeas Corpus.

[104 Pac. 659.]

Criminal Appeals to District Court prom Probate and Justice’s Court — Jurisdiction op District Court — Selling Intoxicating Liquors Without a License.

1. The decision of this court in the ease of *In re Ira Alzamon Lúeas, ante,*p. 164, followed and approved.

2. Upon an appeal to the district court from the probate or justice’s court upon a conviction for selling intoxicating liquors without a license, where the supersedeas bond is given as provided for in Rev. Codes, sec. 8324, the district court has no power or jurisdiction to imprison the defendant.

(Syllabus by the court.)

Original proceeding in this court for writ of *habeas corpus.*

Writ granted and prisoner *discharged.*

W. B. Davidson, for Petitioner.

D. C. MeDougall, Attorney General, and J. H. Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Counsel file no briefs.

STEWART, J.

— The petitioner in this case was charged with the crime of selling intoxicating liquors without a license and was tried before a justice of the peace in and for Ada county. He was convicted in the justice’s court and fined in the sum of two hundred dollars, with costs taxed at $69.44, and ordered imprisoned in the county jail till such fine and *172costs be paid, the time of imprisonment not to exceed one day for each two dollars of such fine and costs. From this judgment he appealed to the district court and gave the undertaking provided for in see. '8324 of the Rev. Codes. Upon trial in the district court he was convicted, and the court entered the following judgment against him:

> “It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said E. F. Walton is guilty of selling intoxicating liquors without a license, and that he be punished by imprisonment in the county jail of the county of Ada, state of Idaho, for the term of fifty days or pay a fine of one hundred dollars, or two dollars for each day of said term not served.

> “The defendant was then remanded to the custody of the sheriff of the county of Ada, state of Idaho.”

The decision rendered by this court upon the petition of Ira Alzamon Lucas, for a writ of *habeas corpus,*is decisive of this ease, and for the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment rendered by the district court in this case was in excess of the jurisdiction of such court, and the defendant must be *discharged.*

The punishment prescribed by Rev. Codes, see. 1518, for selling or giving away intoxicating liquors without first procuring a license, is a fine in any sum not less than $100 nor more than $300. Under this statute imprisonment cannot be made a part of the punishment by the district court, upon appeal from a conviction in a justice’s or probate court, where a supersedeas bond is given as provided for in Rev. Codes, sec. 8324, and the district court is without power or jurisdiction to imprison the defendant. The petitioner is *discharged.*

Sullivan, C. J., and Ailshie, J\, concur.
(March 3, 1908.)

#### A. L. MURPHY, Appellant, v. CANYON COUNTY et al., Respondents.

[94 Pac. 1033.]

PER CURIAM.

In this case precisely the same questions are raised as in the case of *Gilbert v. Canyon County, ante,*p. 429, 94 Pac. 1027. On the same day that the proceedings were had for the construction of the bridge at Notus, certain proceedings were had by the board for the construction of a bridge at Middleton, and the issuing and selling of bonds for the payment of the same. The proceedings in regard to said two bridges were taken on the same day and are in exactly the same language, except as to the name of the towns where said bridges were to be located, and the amount of bonds to be issued for each bridge, and both eases involve the same questions for decision. On the authority of *Gilbert v. Canyon County, supra,*the judgment in this case is reversed, and costs are awarded to the appellant.

.The attorneys in both cases were the same.
DAVIS SERIES, INC.

2949 East Elvira Road, Suite 101

Tucson, Arizona 85706

(520) 434-3771

 

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 302

 

I, Kenneth C. Eich, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Davis Series, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial information included in this report, and the financial statements on which the financial information is based, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-2(c) under the Investment Company Act) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

 

c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

 

----
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1730

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide that certain environmental reports shall continue

to be required to be submitted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1730 ES

1 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN

2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS.

3 (a) WATER QUALITY INVENTORY.—Section 305(b) of

4 the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.

5 1315(b)) is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Each’’ and

7 inserting ‘‘Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public

8 Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734),

9 each’’; and

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘The’’ and in11 serting ‘‘Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public

12 Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734),

13 the’’.

14 (b) CLEAN WATER NEEDS SURVEY.—Section 516 of

15 the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1375)

16 is amended by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘Notwith17 standing section 3003 of Public Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C.

18 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734), the’’.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section take effect on the earlier of—

21 (1) the date of enactment of this Act; or
3

S 1730 ES

1 (2) December 19, 1999.

Passed the Senate March 27, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1730

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

to provide that certain environmental reportsshall continue to be required to be submitted.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00713-CR

Cary Evette Meyer, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR21485, HONORABLE EDWARD P. MAGRE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant Cary Evette Meyer guilty of delivering less than one gram of

cocaine. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112 (West 2003). The jury assessed

punishment at two years in state jail.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal

is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), by demonstrating that the only arguable contention that might support the appeal

is ultimately without merit. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of her right

to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: November 14, 2007

Do Not Publish
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 15 - 00263 - CV
In the Interest of M.H., II, a child § § § § § From County Court at Law No. 1 of Parker County (CIV

- 14
- 0611) F e brurary 5 , 2016 Opinion by Justice Gardner Concurring and Dissent ing Opinion by Justice Gabriel 

### JUDGMENT This court has considered the record on appeal in this case as to Appellant Mother C

. J

. H

. and holds that there was error in the trial court’s jud gment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is reversed as to termination of the parent
- child relationship between Appellant Mother C

. J

. H

. and the child, M. W. H., II, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consist ent with this opinion

. The trial court must commence a new trial no later than 180 days after the date this court issues the mandate in this appeal. This court has considered the record on appeal in this case as to Appellant Father M

. W

. H

. and holds that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as to Appellant Father M

. W

. H

.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS By

_ /s/ Anne Gardner

_________________ Justice Anne Gardner
EXHIBIT 8
                                                                       ---------


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Four Seasons Hotels Inc. on Form 40-F
for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Isadore Sharp, Chief Executive
Officer of Four Seasons Hotels Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1.      The Report fully complied with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        Four Seasons Hotels Inc.

Dated:  April 19, 2004                                /s/  Isadore Sharp
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Isadore Sharp
                                                      Chief Executive Officer





          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Four Seasons  Hotels Inc. on Form 40-F
for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas L. Ludwig, Chief
Financial  Officer of Four Seasons Hotels Inc., certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that:

1.      The Report fully complied with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        Four Seasons Hotels Inc.

Dated:  April 19, 2004                                /s/  Douglas L. Ludwig
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Douglas L. Ludwig
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Synovics  Pharmaceuticals  Inc.  (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Ronald Howard Lane,  the Principal  Financial  Officer of  Registrant,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



/s/ Ronald Howard Lane
-------------------------------
Ronald Howard Lane
Principal Financial Officer
February 13, 2007

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Synovics,  Inc. and will be retained by Synovics, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(November 3, 1924.)

#### E. F. WALTON, Respondent, v. W. W. PARISH, Appellant.

[231 Pac. 717.]

APPEAL from the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, for Twin Falk County. Hon. William A. Babcock, Judge.

Action for removal of officer for neglect of official duties and for recovery of penalty.

Motion to dismiss appeal from the judgment *granted.*Order denying motion for new trial *affirmed.*

Walters *&*Parry, for Appellant.

Homer C. Mills, for Respondent.

WM. E. LEE, J.

On the authority of the case of *Walton v. Clark, ante,*p. 86, 231 Pac. 713, the motion to' dismiss the appeal from the judgment is granted, and the order denying motion for new trial is affirmed, with costs to respondent.

McCarthy, C. J., and Brinck, District Judge, concur.

Budge and William A. Lee, JJ., dissent.
**Exhibit 32**

Certification pursuant to 18 USC 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002         The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by AB&T Financial Corporation (the "Registrant") for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant on the dates and for the periods presented therein.         

                                                                                                           Date: May 15, 2009                    /s/ Daniel C. Ayscue               

Daniel C. Ayscue

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM M. RICHARDSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 250 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of January, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
BDO                   BDO Dunwoody LLP            600 Cathedral Place
                      Chartered Accountants       925 West Georgia Street
                                                  Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3L2
                                                  Telephone:  (604) 688-5421
                                                  Telefax:  (604) 688-5132
                                                  E-mail:  vancouver@bdo.ca
                                                  www.bdo.ca

                                  Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Minera Andes Inc.
Spokane, Washington


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 and S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 333-77663 and
333-34023, respectively) of Minera Andes Inc., of our report dated March 4, 2005
(except for Note 13, March 22, 2005) relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Minera Andes Inc., which appears in this Form 10-KSB.


/s/  BDO Dunwoody LLP
-----------------------------
     BDO Dunwoody LLP

     Chartered Accountants


     Vancouver, Canada
     April 29, 2005
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 1225** 

Regina Boston ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

COLLECTION COMPANY OF AMERICA ,
Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv
- 00603

- GCM )

Submitted : July 17, 2013 Decided: August 13, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Regina Boston, Appellant Pro Se. Caren D. Enloe, MORRIS MANNING & MARTIN, LLP, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Regina Boston appeals the dist rict court ’ s order
dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim . We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boston

v. Collection Co. of Am. , No. 3:12

- cv
- 00603

- G CM (W.D.N.C. Jan.

16, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED