alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 302(a) OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      Colin
      Halpern, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Universal Services Group,
      Inc.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report; and




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report.




DATE:
                August 15, 2007/s/
                COLIN HALPERNColin
                Halpern
                Chief
                  Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
                  Officer
768 P.2d 826

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Susan MILES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17262.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Feb. 2, 1989.

Scott E. Axline, Blackfoot, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., David R. Minert, Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-respondent.

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Susan Miles appeals from the district court’s appellate decision upholding a judgment of conviction entered in the magistrate division upon Miles’ plea of guilty to driving while under the influence. The issue presented here is the same issue we addressed in *State v. Glidden,*115 Idaho 560, 768 P.2d 823 (Ct.App.1989) also released today. In *Glidden*we concluded that a magistrate did not improperly exercise his sentencing discretion where he limited his sentencing alternatives through a self-imposed policy of not granting withheld judgments for driving while under the influence. We held that such a narrow policy was permissible.

Prior to accepting Miles’ guilty plea the magistrate here stated:

> Miss Miles so you’re not — so you fully understand the Court’s position as indicated to Counsel, this Court does not grant withheld judgments for convictions of driving while under the influence. Simply because when the Legislature amended the Idaho law relative to driving while under the influence and certainly in one sub-paragraph and I believe it’s either 7 or 8, indicates to this Court and this Court’s interpretation in reading that paragraph that it doesn’t make any difference at all. A withheld judgment is still considered a conviction for all purposes. I just don’t grant them because I don’t see any reason why a defendant should leave here thinking that he’s got something when in fact he’s got nothing.

The magistrate’s policy apparently was the result of an exercise of reason in light of legislative action and the magistrate’s sentencing experience. The transcript further reveals that the magistrate recognized the *564discretion he possessed in deciding whether to grant a withheld judgment; he was not under the impression that a withheld judgment was prohibited. We believe the magistrate here exercised appropriate sentencing authority, not arbitrary action, in crafting his policy. Consequently, we hold that the magistrate properly exercised his sentencing discretion. Miles* remaining questions concerning her sentence are precisely those addressed in *Glidden.*The same law and reasoning apply in this case.

The district court’s appellate decision upholding the judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.

WALTERS, C.J., and BURNETT, J., concur.
|   | (1) | The Report fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   | (2) | The information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|   |
|   |

|                     Date:  August      13, 2008 | /s/   Barry      H.      Black                                                            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                            | Barry H.      Black                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|                                                                                                                            | Vice President      of Finance and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                            |
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-56829, No. 333-89465, and No. 333-108119 ofCuraGen Corporation on Forms S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-90321, No. 333-32756, and No. 333-47600 of CuraGen Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated January 23, 2004 (except as to Footnote 13, as to which the date is February 17,2004) in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CuraGen Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Hartford,Connecticut 

March 11, 2004
Exhibit 32.2



                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                       SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Technology Research Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Scott J. Loucks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.






    August 16, 2004           /s/ Scott J. Loucks
    ---------------           -------------------
          Date                Scott J. Loucks
                              Vice President of Finance and
                              Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)

     I, Patrick C. Barry, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bluefly, Inc;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b. [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions
contained in SEC Release 34-47986];

          c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

          a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

Date  March 2, 2004                     /s/ Patrick C. Barry
                                        --------------------
                                        Patrick C. Barry
                                        Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: 

 

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 Nos. 333-131026, 333-119102 and333-133088) of NeoMagic Corporation; 

 

(2) RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-119093, 333-30843, 333-57217, 333-88383, 333-50406, 333-70222, 333-102231, and 333-109023) of NeoMagic Corporation; 

 

of our report dated April 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of NeoMagic Corporation, for each of the two years in theperiod ended January 30, 2005 included in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended January 29, 2006. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

October 26, 2006
Exhibit 99(c)


                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                         Pursuant to Section 3.05 of the
                         Pooling and Servicing Agreement

                          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION

                       HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN CORPORATION

                     HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN DEPOSIT TRUST I

                    -----------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Household Finance
Corporation, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), pursuant to a Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of September 1, 1995 (the "Agreement"), among Household
Consumer Loan Corporation, as Seller, the Servicer, and JP Morgan Trust-Company,
N.A. (Successor in interest to The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.), as Trustee, does
hereby certify that:

                  1.       The Servicer is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer
         under the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have
         their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

                  2.       The undersigned is a servicing officer who is duly
         authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this
         Certificate to the Trustee.

                  3.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the
         calendar year ended December 31, 2002 and of its performance under the
         Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

                  4.       Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best
         of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations
         under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the
         performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as
         set forth in paragraph 5 below.
<PAGE>

                  5.       The following is a description of each default in the
         performance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the
         Agreement known to me to have been made by the Servicer during the year
         ended December 31, 2002, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of
         each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to
         remedy each such default and (iii) the current status of each such
         default:

                                     N O N E

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 31st day of March, 2003



                                       HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
                                         as Servicer



                                       By: /s/ STEVEN H. SMITH
                                           -------------------
                                           Steven H. Smith
                                           Assistant Treasurer
Exhibit 10.10


 





 


January 13, 2014


 


Gene Gerner





 





Dear Gene:


 


I am pleased to inform you that, effective February 1, 2014, your
employment with CPP as its Chief Scientific Officer on a halftime employee basis will reflect an increase in salary to $120,000
per year (equivalent to a full-time salary of $240,000 per year).


 


Thank you for your exemplary contributions to CPP. I look forward
to achieving great things together at Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals!


 





	Sincerely,	 
	 	 
	/s/Jeffrey Jacob	 
	Jeffrey Jacob	 
	CEO	 




 


Agreed to and Accepted by:


 


	/s/ Eugene
    Gerner	 	 2/1/2014
	Eugene Gerner, Ph.D.	 	Date
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
      undersigned, Colin Halpern, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial
      Officer and Director of Universal Services Group, Inc. (the
      "Company"),certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes
      of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2007 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:
                August 15, 2007/s/
                Colin HalpernColin
                Halpern
              Chief
                Executive Officer,
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer and Director





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ER IC DE LEON-SANC HEZ, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 11-71186 Age n c y No. A098-914-820 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d April 22, 2015 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, B YB EE, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Eric De Le on-Sanc he z , a

native and c itiz e n

of Guate m a la , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ion for a sy lum , withholding of rem o v a l, a nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture



# FIL ED APR 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Silay a v . Muk ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th C ir. 2008). W e d e ny in pa rt a nd gra nt in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w, a nd we re m and. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of De Le on-San c he z ’ s C AT c la i m

be c a use he fa ile d to e sta

b lish it is m

ore like ly tha n not he would be torture d if re turne d to Gua te m a la . Se eid. at 1073. Thus, we de ny the pe tition for re vie w a s to De Le on-Sanc he z ’ s C AT c la im . In de ny ing De Le on-Sanc he z ’ s a s y l um an d withholding of re

m ova l c la im s, the a ge nc y found he fa i le d to e sta blish pa st pe rse c ution or a fe a r of future pe rse c ution on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. W

he n the IJ a

nd B IA issue d the ir de c isions in this c a se , the y did not ha

ve the be ne fit of this c ourt’ s de c isions in He nrique z-Riv as v . Holde r , 707 F.3d 1081 (9th C ir. 2013) (e n ba nc ), C ordoba v . Holde r , 726 F.3d 1106 (9th C ir. 2013), a n d Pirir-Boc v . Holde r , 750 F.3d 1077 (9th C ir. 2014), or theB IA’ s de c isions in Matte r of M-E-V-G- , 26 I. & N. De c . 227 (B IA 2014), a

nd Matte r of W

-G-R- , 26 I. & N. De c . 208 (B IA 2014). Thus, we re m and De Le on-Sanc he z ’ s a sy lum and withholding of re

m ova l c l a im s to de te rm i ne the im

pa c t, if a ny , of the se de c isions. Se eIN S v . Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (pe r c uriam ). 1 1 - 7 1 1 8 6 2Ea c h pa rty sha ll be a r its own c osts for this petition for re vie w . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; G RANT E D in par t; RE M A NDE D.

1 1 - 7 1 1 8 6 3
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131888-89 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 131888-89 

 COA: 260806, 260809 

Wayne CC: 04-008388-01

OTIS MYLES, JR., 04-003822-01 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would remand for performance of testing as originally ordered by 

the trial court. 

s1206 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 13, 2006 

 Clerk
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-15193

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:02-cr-00064-HLA-JBT-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO GARCIA-ABARCA,

a.k.a. Ricardo Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

No. 12-15194

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00098-MMH-JBT-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

Case: 12-15194 Date Filed: 06/07/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

versus

RICARDO GARCIA-ABARCA,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(June 7, 2013)

Before HULL, JORDAN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Roland Falcon, counsel for Ricardo Garcia-Abarca in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garcia-Abarca’s conviction and 

sentence, along with the revocation of his supervised release and corresponding 

sentence, are AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-15194 Date Filed: 06/07/2013 Page: 2 of 2