Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 3383 

The Secretary invites comments from 

small LEAs as to whether they believe 

these interim final requirements will 

have a significant economic impact on 

them and, if so, requests evidence to 

support that belief. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

The interim final requirements 

contain information collection 

requirements that are subject to review 

by OMB under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520). The Department had received 

previously emergency approval for the 

information collections in the final SIG 

requirements published on December 

10, 2009, under OMB Control Number 

1810–0682. The Department will submit 

to OMB a Paperwork Reduction Act 

Change Worksheet for this collection 

that will include the changes described 

below. 

In the interim final requirements, the 

Department is increasing its estimates of 

the number of LEAs that will apply for 

and have to report on using SIG funds 

from the estimates included in the 

December 10, 2009, final SIG 

requirements. This change factors in the 

provision in the Consolidated 

Appropriations Act, 2010 regarding 

which schools are eligible to receive SIG 

funds, which will likely increase the 

number of LEAs that apply to their SEA 

for these funds. The Department used its 

data on the number of LEAs receiving 

Title I, Part A funds and the proportion 

of LEAs with identified schools to 

estimate the new figures. The estimates 

for SEAs remain the same because the 

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 

changes do not affect the number of 

SEAs that can apply. 

A description of the specific 

information collection requirements is 

provided in the following tables along 

with estimates of the annual 

recordkeeping burden for these 

requirements. The estimates include 

time for an SEA and an LEA to prepare 

their respective applications (including 

requests for waivers), an SEA to review 

an LEA’s application, and an LEA to 

report data to an SEA and the SEA to 

report those data to the Department. The 

first table shows the estimated burden 

for SEAs and the second table shows the 

estimated burden for LEAs. 

STATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY ESTIMATES* 

SIG activity Number of 

SEAs 

Hours/ 

activity Hours Cost/hour Cost 

Complete SEA application (including requests for waivers) ................... 52 100 5,200 $30 $156,000 

Review and post LEA applications .......................................................... 52 800 41,600 30 1,248,000 

Collect and report school-level data to the Department ** ...................... 52 80 4,160 30 124,800 

Total .................................................................................................. .................... .................... 50,960 30 1,528,800 

* The SEA estimates remain the same from the December 10, 2009, final SIG requirements. 

** These are data the Department does not currently collect through EDFacts. 

LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY ESTIMATES

SIG activity Number 

of LEAs 

Hours/ 

activity Hours Cost/hour Cost 

Complete LEA application (including requests for waivers if the SEA 

does not so request) ............................................................................ 3,050 60 183,000 $25 $4,575,000

Report data to SEA* ................................................................................ 1,200 40 48,000 25 1,200,000

Total .................................................................................................. .................... .................... 231,000 25 5,775,000 

* These are data the Department does not currently collect through EDFacts. 

Intergovernmental Review 

This program is not subject to 

Executive Order 12372 and the 

regulations in 34 CFR 79. 

Electronic Access to This Document 

You may view this document, as well 

as all other documents of this 

Department published in the Federal 

Register, in text or Adobe Portable 

Document Format (PDF) on the Internet 

at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ 

news/fedregister. 

To use PDF, you must have Adobe 

Acrobat Reader, which is available free 

at this site. 

Note: The official version of this document 

is the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the Code 

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO 

Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ 

index.html. 

Dated: January 13, 2010. 

Arne Duncan, 

Secretary of Education. 

[FR Doc. 2010–1048 Filed 1–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

39 CFR Part 3020 

[Docket Nos. MC2010–7 and CP2010–7; 

Order No. 361] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is adding 

Express Mail Contract 7 to the 

Competitive Product List. This action is 

consistent with a postal reform law. 

Republication of the lists of market 

dominant and competitive products is 

also consistent with statutory 

requirements. 

DATES: Effective January 21, 2010 and is 

applicable beginning December 15, 

2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

202–789–6820 or 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory 

History, 74 FR 57538 (November 6, 

2009). 

I. Introduction 

II. Background 

III. Comments 

IV. Commission Analysis 

V. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

The Postal Service seeks to add a new 

product identified as Express Mail 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
3384 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

1Request of the United States Postal Service to 

Add Express Mail Contract 7 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of 

Contract and Supporting Data, October 28, 2009 

(Request). On October 29, 2009, the Postal Service 

filed errata to its Request. See Notice of the United 

States Postal Service of Filing Errata to Request and 

Notice, October 29, 2009. Accordingly, the filing of 

the entire set of documents related to this Request 

was not completed until October 29, 2009. 

2Attachment A to the Request, reflecting 

Governors’ Decision No. 09–14, October 26, 2009. 

3Attachment B to the Request. 

4Attachment C to the Request. 

5Attachment D to the Request. 

6Attachment E to the Request. 

7Attachment F to the Request. 

8 In its application for non-public treatment, the 

Postal Service requests an indefinite extension of 

non-public treatment of customer-identifying 

information. Id. at 7. For the reasons discussed in 

PRC Order No. 323, that request is denied. See, e.g., 

Docket No. MC2010–1 and CP2010–1, Order 

Concerning Priority Mail Contract 19 Negotiated 

Service Agreement, October 26, 2009 (Order No. 

323). 

9PRC Order No. 331, Notice and Order 

Concerning Express Mail Contract 7 Negotiated 

Service Agreement, October 30, 2009 (Order No. 

331). 

10Notice of the United States Postal Service of 

Filing Responses to Chairman’s Information 

Request No. 1, Question 1, Subparts (b)-(d), Under 

Seal, November 13, 2009 (Partial Response to CHIR 

No. 1). With its Partial Response to CHIR No. 1, the 

Postal Service also filed a motion for late 

acceptance which contained an explanation of the 

reason for the delay and the issues with responding 

to the remaining information requests. Motion of 

the United States Postal Service for Late Acceptance 

of Responses to Chairman’s Information Request 

No. 1, November 13, 2009. The motion is granted. 

11Notice of Filing of Chairman’s Information 

Request No. 2 Under Seal, November 16, 2009. 

12Notice of the United States Postal Service of 

Filing Response to Chairman’s Information Request 

No. 2, Under Seal, November 19, 2009. 

13Notice of the United States Postal Service of 

Filing Response to Chairman’s Information Request 

No. 1, Question 1(a), Under Seal, December 9, 2009 

(Remaining Response to CHIR No. 1). With its 

Remaining Response to CHIR No. 1, the Postal 

Service filed a motion for late acceptance of that 

response. Motion of the United States Postal Service 

for Late Acceptance of Response to Chairman’s 

Information Request No. 1, Question 1(a), December 

9, 2009. The motion is granted, although the Postal 

Service should be aware that the significant delay 

in the Commission’s decision in this case is directly 

related to the delay in the Postal Service’s filing of 

this response. 

14Public Representative Comments in Response 

to United States Postal Service Request to Add 

Express Mail Contract 7 to the Competitive Product 

List, November 9, 2009 (Public Representative 

Comments). 

Contract 7 to the Competitive Product 

List. For the reasons discussed below, 

the Commission approves the Request. 

II. Background 

At the end of October 2009, the Postal 

Service filed a formal request and 

associated supporting information 

pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 

3020.30 et seq. to add Express Mail 

Contract 7 to the Competitive Product 

List.1 The Postal Service asserts that the 

Express Mail Contract 7 product is a 

competitive product ‘‘not of general 

applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 

U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). This Request has been 

assigned Docket No. MC2010–7. 

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a contract 

related to the proposed new product 

pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 

CFR 3015.5. The contract has been 

assigned Docket No. CP2010–7. 

In support of its Request, the Postal 

Service filed the following materials: (1) 

A redacted version of the Governors’ 

Decision authorizing certain types of 

Express Mail contracts;2 (2) a redacted 

version of the contract;3 (3) a requested 

change in the Mail Classification 

Schedule product list;4 (4) a Statement 

of Supporting Justification as required 

by 39 CFR 3020.32;5 (5) a certification 

of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a);6

and (6) an application for non-public 

treatment of the materials filed under 

seal.7 The redacted version of the 

contract provides that the contract is 

terminable on 30 days’ notice by either 

party, but could continue for 3 years 

from the effective date subject to annual 

price adjustments. Request, Attachment 

B. 

In the Statement of Supporting 

Justification, Mary Prince Anderson, 

Acting Manager, Sales and 

Communications, Expedited Shipping, 

asserts that the service to be provided 

under the contract will cover its 

attributable costs, make a positive 

contribution to coverage of institutional 

costs, and will increase contribution 

toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the 

Postal Service’s total institutional costs. 

Request, Attachment D, at 1. W. Ashley 

Lyons, Manager, Regulatory Reporting 

and Cost Analysis, Finance Department, 

certifies that the contract complies with 

39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id., Attachment E. 

The Postal Service filed much of the 

supporting materials, including the 

supporting data and the unredacted 

contract, under seal. The Postal Service 

maintains that the contract and related 

financial information, including the 

customer’s name and the accompanying 

analyses that provide prices, certain 

terms and conditions, and financial 

projections, should remain confidential. 

Id., Attachment F, at 2–3.8

In Order No. 331, the Commission 

gave notice of the two dockets, 

appointed a public representative, and 

provided the public with an opportunity 

to comment.9 On November 2, 2009, 

Chairman’s Information Request No. 1 

(CHIR No. 1) was filed. The due date for 

responding to CHIR No. 1 was set as 

November 9, 2009. On November 13, 

2009, the Postal Service filed a partial 

response to CHIR No. 1.10 Seeking 

clarification of information contained in 

the Postal Service’s November 13, 2009 

partial response, Chairman’s 

Information Request No. 2 (CHIR No. 2) 

was filed on November 16, 2009.11 The 

Postal Service responded to CHIR No. 2 

on November 19, 2009.12 On December 

9, 2009, the Postal Service filed its 

response to the outstanding questions in 

CHIR No. 1.13

III. Comments 

Comments were timely filed by the 

Public Representative on November 9, 

2009.14 No comments were submitted 

by other interested parties. The Public 

Representative states that the Postal 

Service’s filing meets the pertinent 

provisions of title 39 and the relevant 

Commission rules. Id. at 1–3. He further 

states that the agreement is fair to the 

parties and employs pricing terms 

favorable to the customer, the Postal 

Service, and thereby, the public. Id. at 

4–5. The Public Representative also 

believes that the Postal Service has 

provided appropriate justification for 

maintaining confidentiality in this case. 

Id. at 3. 

IV. Commission Analysis 

The Commission has reviewed the 

Request, the contract, the financial 

analysis provided under seal that 

accompanies the Request, the responses 

to CHIR Nos. 1 and 2, and the comments 

filed by the Public Representative. 

Statutory requirements. The 

Commission’s statutory responsibilities 

in this instance entail assigning Express 

Mail Contract 7 to either the Market 

Dominant Product List or to the 

Competitive Product List. 39 U.S.C. 

3642. As part of this responsibility, the 

Commission also reviews the proposal 

for compliance with the Postal 

Accountability and Enhancement Act 

(PAEA) requirements. This includes, for 

proposed competitive products, a 

review of the provisions applicable to 

rates for competitive products. 39 U.S.C. 

3633. 

Product list assignment. In 

determining whether to assign Express 

Mail Contract 7 as a product to the 

Market Dominant Product List or the 

Competitive Product List, the 

Commission must consider whether 

the Postal Service exercises sufficient 

market power that it can effectively set the 

price of such product substantially above 

costs, raise prices significantly, decrease 

quality, or decrease output, without risk of 

losing a significant level of business to other 

firms offering similar products. 

39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1). If so, the product 

will be categorized as market dominant. 

The competitive category of products 

consists of all other products. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 3385 

The Commission is further required to 

consider the availability and nature of 

enterprises in the private sector engaged 

in the delivery of the product, the views 

of those who use the product, and the 

likely impact on small business 

concerns. 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(3). 

The Postal Service asserts that its 

bargaining position is constrained by 

the existence of other shippers who can 

provide similar services, thus 

precluding it from taking unilateral 

action to increase prices without the 

risk of losing volume to private 

companies. Request, Attachment D, 

para. (d). The Postal Service also 

contends that it may not decrease 

quality or output without risking the 

loss of business to competitors that offer 

similar expedited delivery services. Id. 

It further states that the contract partner 

supports the addition of the contract to 

the Competitive Product List to 

effectuate the negotiated contractual 

terms. Id., para. (g). Finally, the Postal 

Service states that the market for 

expedited delivery services is highly 

competitive and requires a substantial 

infrastructure to support a national 

network. It indicates that large carriers 

serve this market. Accordingly, the 

Postal Service states that it is unaware 

of any small business concerns that 

could offer comparable service for this 

customer. Id., para. (h). 

No commenter opposes the proposed 

classification of Express Mail Contract 7 

as competitive. Having considered the 

statutory requirements and the support 

offered by the Postal Service, the 

Commission finds that Express Mail 

Contract 7 is appropriately classified as 

a competitive product and should be 

added to the Competitive Product List. 

Cost considerations. In its initial 

filings, the Postal Service presented an 

incomplete financial analysis of Express 

Mail Contract 7. The incomplete initial 

filings did not allow the Commission to 

undertake the required analysis of 

Express Mail Contract 7 until the Postal 

Service fully responded to CHIR Nos. 1 

and 2. Because the Postal Service did 

not fully respond to CHIR No. 1 until 

December 9, 2009, the Commission 

could not begin its analysis until that 

time. Even then, further informal 

follow-up to the Postal Service’s 

responses to CHIR No. 1 was necessary 

for a complete understanding of the 

data. 

Based on the data and explanations 

submitted, the Commission finds that 

Express Mail Contract 7 should cover its 

attributable costs (39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(2)), 

should not lead to the subsidization of 

competitive products by market 

dominant products (39 U.S.C. 

3633(a)(1)), and should have a positive 

effect on competitive products’ 

contribution to institutional costs (39 

U.S.C. 3633(a)(3)). Thus, an initial 

review of proposed Express Mail 

Contract 7 indicates that it comports 

with the provisions applicable to rates 

for competitive products. The 

Commission’s analysis is provided in 

Library Reference PRC-CP2010–7–NPLR1 which is being filed under seal. 

Other considerations. The Postal 

Service shall notify the Commission if 

termination occurs prior to the 

scheduled termination date. Following 

the scheduled termination date of the 

agreement, the Commission will remove 

the product from the Competitive 

Product List. 

Further, while the Commission 

currently believes that the contract is 

expected to comply with the applicable 

requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633, the 

Commission seeks to ensure that it is 

provided with the proper level of detail 

to make appropriate findings in the FY 

2010 Annual Compliance Determination 

(ACD) with respect to this contract. To 

that end, the Postal Service should view 

Library Reference PRC-CP2010–7–NPLR1 as illustrative of the granularity of 

the information to be reported with 

respect to this contract. 

In conclusion, the Commission 

approves Express Mail Contract 7 as a 

new product. The revision to the 

Competitive Product List is shown 

below the signature of this order and is 

effective upon issuance of this order. 

V. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. Express Mail Contract 7 (MC2010– 

7 and CP2010–7) is added to the 

Competitive Product List as a new 

product under Negotiated Service 

Agreements, Domestic. 

2. The Postal Service shall notify the 

Commission if termination occurs prior 

to the scheduled termination date. 

3. The Postal Service shall view 

Library Reference PRC-CP2010–7–NPLR1 as illustrative of the level of detail 

of information that the Commission 

seeks with respect to this contract in 

connection with its FY 2010 Annual 

Compliance Determination proceeding. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for the 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 3020 

Administrative practice and 

procedure; Postal Service. 

By the Commission. 

Judith M. Grady, 

Acting Secretary. 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Postal Regulatory 

Commission amends chapter III of title 

39 of the Code of Federal Regulations as 

follows: 

PART 3020—PRODUCT LISTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 3020 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Authority: 39 U.S.C. 503; 3622; 

3631; 3642; 3682. 

■ 2. Revise Appendix A to Subpart A of 

Part 3020–Mail Classification Schedule 

to read as follows: 

Appendix A to Subpart A of Part 

3020—Mail Classification Schedule 

Part A—Market Dominant Products 

1000 Market Dominant Product List 

First-Class Mail 

Single-Piece Letters/Postcards 

Bulk Letters/Postcards 

Flats 

Parcels 

Outbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail 

International 

Inbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail 

International 

Standard Mail (Regular and Nonprofit) 

High Density and Saturation Letters 

High Density and Saturation Flats/Parcels 

Carrier Route 

Letters 

Flats 

Not Flat-Machinables (NFMs)/Parcels 

Periodicals 

Within County Periodicals 

Outside County Periodicals 

Package Services 

Single-Piece Parcel Post 

Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at UPU 

rates) 

Bound Printed Matter Flats 

Bound Printed Matter Parcels 

Media Mail/Library Mail 

Special Services 

Ancillary Services 

International Ancillary Services 

Address List Services 

Caller Service 

Change-of-Address Credit Card Authentication 

Confirm 

International Reply Coupon Service 

International Business Reply Mail 

Service 

Money Orders 

Post Office Box Service 

Negotiated Service Agreements 

HSBC North America Holdings Inc. Negotiated Service Agreement 

Bookspan Negotiated Service Agreement 

Bank of America Corporation Negotiated Service Agreement 

The Bradford Group Negotiated Service 

Agreement 

Inbound International 

Canada Post—United States Postal 

Service Contractual Bilateral 

Agreement for Inbound Market 

Dominant Services 

Market Dominant Product Descriptions 

First-Class Mail 

[Reserved for Class Description] 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
3386 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

Single-Piece Letters/Postcards 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Bulk Letters/Postcards 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Flats 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Parcels 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Outbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail 

International 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Inbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail 

International 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Standard Mail (Regular and Nonprofit) 

[Reserved for Class Description] 

High Density and Saturation Letters 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

High Density and Saturation Flats/Parcels 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Carrier Route 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Letters 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Flats 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Not Flat-Machinables (NFMs)/Parcels 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Periodicals 

[Reserved for Class Description] 

Within County Periodicals 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Outside County Periodicals 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Package Services 

[Reserved for Class Description] 

Single-Piece Parcel Post 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at UPU 

rates) 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Bound Printed Matter Flats 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Bound Printed Matter Parcels 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Media Mail/Library Mail 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Special Services 

[Reserved for Class Description] 

Ancillary Services 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Address Correction Service 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Applications and Mailing Permits 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Business Reply Mail 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Bulk Parcel Return Service 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Certified Mail 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Certificate of Mailing 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Collect on Delivery 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Delivery Confirmation 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Insurance 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Merchandise Return Service 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Parcel Airlift (PAL) 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Registered Mail 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Return Receipt 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Return Receipt for Merchandise 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Restricted Delivery 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Shipper-Paid Forward 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Signature Confirmation 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Special Handling 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Stamped Envelopes 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Stamped Cards 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Premium Stamped Stationery 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Premium Stamped Cards 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Ancillary Services 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Certificate of Mailing 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Registered Mail 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Return Receipt 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Restricted Delivery 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Address List Services 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Caller Service 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Change-of-Address Credit Card Authentication 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Confirm 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Reply Coupon Service 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Business Reply Mail 

Service 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Money Orders 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Post Office Box Service 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Negotiated Service Agreements 

[Reserved for Class Description] 

HSBC North America Holdings Inc. Negotiated Service Agreement 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Bookspan Negotiated Service Agreement 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Bank of America Corporation Negotiated Service Agreement 

The Bradford Group Negotiated Service 

Agreement 

Part B—Competitive Products 

2000 Competitive Product List 

Express Mail 

Express Mail 

Outbound International Expedited 

Services 

Inbound International Expedited Services 

Inbound International Expedited 

Services 1 (CP2008–7) 

Inbound International Expedited 

Services 2 (MC2009–10 and 

CP2009–12) 

Priority Mail 

Priority Mail 

Outbound Priority Mail International 

Inbound Air Parcel Post 

Royal Mail Group Inbound Air 

Parcel Post Agreement 

Parcel Select 

Parcel Return Service 

International 

International Priority Airlift (IPA) 

International Surface Airlift (ISAL) 

International Direct Sacks—M—Bags 

Global Customized Shipping Services 

Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at nonUPU rates) 

Canada Post—United States Postal 

Service Contractual Bilateral 

Agreement for Inbound Competitive Services (MC2009–8 and 

CP2009–9) 

International Money Transfer Service 

International Ancillary Services 

Special Services 

Premium Forwarding Service 

Negotiated Service Agreements 

Domestic 

Express Mail Contract 1 (MC2008– 

5) 

Express Mail Contract 2 (MC2009– 

3 and CP2009–4) 

Express Mail Contract 3 (MC2009– 

15 and CP2009–21) 

Express Mail Contract 4 (MC2009– 

34 and CP2009–45) 

Express Mail Contract 5 (MC2010– 

5 and CP2010–5) 

Express Mail Contract 6 (MC2010- 

–6 and CP2010–6) 

Express Mail Contract 7 (MC2010- 

–7 and CP2010–7) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2009–6 and CP2009– 

7) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2 (MC2009–12 and 

CP2009–14) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 3 (MC2009–13 and 

CP2009–17) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 4 (MC2009–17 and 

CP2009–24) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 5 (MC2009–18 and 

CP2009–25) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 6 (MC2009–31 and 

CP2009–42) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 7 (MC2009–32 and 

CP2009–43) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 8 (MC2009–33 and 

CP2009–44) 

Parcel Select & Parcel Return Service Contract 1 (MC2009–11 and 

CP2009–13) 

Parcel Select & Parcel Return Service Contract 2 (MC2009–40 and 

CP2009–61) 

Parcel Return Service Contract 1 

(MC2009–1 and CP2009–2) 

Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2008– 

8 and CP2008–26) 

Priority Mail Contract 2 (MC2009– 

2 and CP2009–3) 

Priority Mail Contract 3 (MC2009– 

4 and CP2009–5) 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 3387 

Priority Mail Contract 4 (MC2009– 

5 and CP2009–6) 

Priority Mail Contract 5 (MC2009– 

21 and CP2009–26) 

Priority Mail Contract 6 (MC2009– 

25 and CP2009–30) 

Priority Mail Contract 7 (MC2009– 

25 and CP2009–31) 

Priority Mail Contract 8 (MC2009– 

25 and CP2009–32) 

Priority Mail Contract 9 (MC2009– 

25 and CP2009–33) 

Priority Mail Contract 10 

(MC2009–25 and CP2009–34) 

Priority Mail Contract 11 

(MC2009–27 and CP2009–37) 

Priority Mail Contract 12 

(MC2009–28 and CP2009–38) 

Priority Mail Contract 13 

(MC2009–29 and CP2009–39) 

Priority Mail Contract 14 

(MC2009–30 and CP2009–40) 

Priority Mail Contract 15 

(MC2009–35 and CP2009–54) 

Priority Mail Contract 16 

(MC2009–36 and CP2009–55) 

Priority Mail Contract 17 

(MC2009–37 and CP2009–56) 

Priority Mail Contract 18 

(MC2009–42 and CP2009–63) 

Priority Mail Contract 19 

(MC2010–1 and CP2010–1) 

Priority Mail Contract 20 

(MC2010–2 and CP2010–2) 

Priority Mail Contract 21 

(MC2010–3 and CP2010–3) 

Priority Mail Contract 22 

(MC2010–4 and CP2010–4) 

Priority Mail Contract 23 

(MC2010–9 and CP2010–9) 

Outbound International 

Direct Entry Parcels Contracts 

Direct Entry Parcels 1 

(MC2009–26 and CP2009– 

36) 

Global Direct Contracts (MC2009– 

9, CP2009–10, and CP2009–11) 

Global Expedited Package Services 

(GEPS) Contracts 

GEPS 1 (CP2008–5, CP2008– 

11, CP2008–12, CP2008–13, 

CP2008–18, CP2008–19, 

CP2008–20, CP2008–21, 

CP2008–22, CP2008–23, and 

CP2008–24) 

Global Expedited Package 

Services 2 (CP2009–50) 

Global Plus Contracts 

Global Plus 1 (CP2008–8, 

CP2008–46 and CP2009–47) 

Global Plus 2 (MC2008–7, 

CP2008–48 and CP2008–49) 

Inbound International 

Inbound Direct Entry Contracts 

with Foreign Postal Administrations 

Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign Postal 

Administrations (MC2008–6, 

CP2008–14 and MC2008–15) 

Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign Postal 

Administrations 1 (MC2008– 

6 and CP2009–62) 

International Business Reply Service Competitive Contract 1 

(MC2009–14 and CP2009–20) 

Competitive Product Descriptions 

Express Mail 

[Reserved for Group Description] 

Express Mail 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Outbound International Expedited 

Services 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Inbound International Expedited 

Services 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Priority 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Priority Mail 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Outbound Priority Mail International 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Inbound Air Parcel Post 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Parcel Select 

[Reserved for Group Description] 

Parcel Return Service 

[Reserved for Group Description] 

International 

[Reserved for Group Description] 

International Priority Airlift (IPA) 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Surface Airlift (ISAL) 

[Reserved for Prduct Description] 

International Direct Sacks—M– 

Bags 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Global Customized Shipping Services 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Money Transfer Service 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at 

non-UPU rates) 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Ancillary Services 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Certificate of Mailing 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Registered Mail 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Return Receipt 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Restricted Delivery 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

International Insurance 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Negotiated Service Agreements 

[Reserved for Group Description] 

Domestic 

[Reserved for Product Description] 

Outbound International 

[Reserved for Group Description] 

Part C—Glossary of Terms and Conditions [Reserved] 

Part D—Country Price Lists for International Mail [Reserved] 

[FR Doc. 2010–1055 Filed 1–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 55 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2009–0111; FRL–9095–9] 

Outer Continental Shelf Air 

Regulations Consistency Update for 

Alaska 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the update 

of the Outer Continental Shelf (‘‘OCS’’) 

Air Regulations proposed in the Federal 

Register on March 3, 2009. 

Requirements applying to OCS sources 

located within 25 miles of States’ 

seaward boundaries must be updated 

periodically to remain consistent with 

the requirements of the corresponding 

onshore area (‘‘COA’’), as mandated by 

section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act 

(‘‘the Act’’). The portion of the OCS air 

regulations that is being updated 

pertains to the requirements for OCS 

sources operating off of the State of 

Alaska. The intended effect of 

approving the OCS requirements for the 

State of Alaska is to regulate emissions 

from OCS sources in a manner 

consistent with the requirements 

onshore. The change to the existing 

requirements discussed below is 

incorporated by reference into the 

regulations and is listed in the appendix 

to the OCS air regulations. 

DATES: Effective Date: The final rule 

portion of this rulemaking is effective 

on February 22, 2010. 

This incorporation by reference of 

certain publications listed in this rule is 

approved by the Director of the Federal 

Register as of February 22, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R10–OAR–2009–0111. The 

index to the docket is available 

electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, 

Washington 98101. While all documents 

in the docket are listed in the index, 

some information may be publically 

available only at the hard copy location 

(e.g., copyrighted materials), and some 

may not be publicly available in either 

location (e.g., Confidential Business 

Information). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Natasha Greaves, Federal and Delegated 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES