alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1483 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1483

 To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 
     with respect to export controls on high performance computers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 1999

  Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Kerry, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Daschle, and Mr. 
   Kennedy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 
     with respect to export controls on high performance computers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF COMPOSITE THEORETICAL PERFORMANCE LEVELS OF 
              HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTERS.

    Section 1211(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1998 (50 U.S.C. App. 2404 note) is amended in the second 
sentence by striking ``180'' and inserting ``30''.
                                 <all>
```
767 P.2d 274

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Thomas John HARWOOD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17504.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Dec. 28, 1988.

*432Charles B. Lempesis and Roland D. Watson, Post Falls, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., David R. Minert, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas John Harwood appeals from a judgment imposing a ten-year sentence for first degree burglary, I.C. §§ 18-1402, -1403. The judgment provides that the first three years of the sentence must be spent in confinement, with Harwood being eligible for parole or discharge at any time during the seven-year indeterminate part of the sentence. *See*I.C. § 19-2513 (Unified Sentence Act). The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the district court abused its sentencing discretion. We hold that the sentence was not excessive and we affirm the judgment of conviction.

Harwood pled guilty to the crime of burglary following his arrest during the nighttime inside a Coeur d’Alene business that had closed for the day. The presentence investigation report showed that Harwood had a prior criminal record including numerous burglary and larceny offenses. Harwood had been incarcerated at least five previous times, including substantial prison sentences. At the time of his arrest, Harwood was on probation for grand theft. He was then twenty-eight years old, with a longtime history of severe drug and alcohol abuse. For the burglary in this case, Har-wood could have received a sentence of fifteen years. I.C. § 18-1403.

Having reviewed the full record and having considered the sentencing criteria set forth in *State v. Toohill,*103 Idaho 565, 650 P.2d 707 (Ct.App.1982), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the sentence of ten years. The judgment imposing the sentence is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

      ( print page 24569)    

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Renewable Organics, LLC of Pinehurst, North Carolina, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/026,346, “Process for Removing and Recovering Phosphorus from Animal Waste,” filed on February 5, 2008.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before June 4, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5989.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's patent rights in this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as Renewable Organics, LLC of Pinehurst, North Carolina has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,

Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2010-10557 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
(May 9, 1898.)

#### VERMONT LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY v. MAXWELL.

[53 Pac. 1130.]

Syllabus in this ease same as in *Vermont Loan etc. Co. v. Tetzlaff,*decided at this term, ante, p. 105.

APPEAL from District Court, Latah County.

George W. Goode, for Appellant.

The same question which is submitted by appellants in the case of *Vermont Loan and Trust Go. v. Aaron Tetzlaff et al.,*in this term of this court, which is, “That the contract sued upon, being usurious, the action is prematuretly brought on a default of payment of interest.” The principal note sued upon matured December 1, 1897, this complaint was filed August 21, 1895. *(Vermont Loan etc. Go. v. Hoffman,*5 Idaho, 376, 49 Pac. 314; *Harmon v. Ashmead,*61 Cal. 439; 5 Am. & Eng. Eney. of Law, 483, notes; 12 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 71; notes, *Brackett v. Guenin, 15*Colo. 281, 22 Am. St. Rep. 402, and note, 25 Pac. 167; *Duluth Nat. Bank u. Knoxville Fire Ins. Go.,*85 Tenn. 76, 4 Am. St. Rep. 750, 1 S. W. 689; *Chase v. Whittm, 51*Minn. 485, 53 N; W. 767.)

A. E. Gallagher & R. T. Morgan, for Respondent.

No brief filed.

HUSTON, J.

— This case involving the same question decided in *Vermont Loan etc. Co. v. Tetzlaff et al.,*ante, p. 105, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint.

Costs to appellant.

Sullivan, C. J., and Quarles, J., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

d0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

139992 

GENE T. FAVORS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139992 

 COA: 292245 

Ingham CC: 08-001343-CZ 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 154

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the licensing of

ammunition manufacturers, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

the licensing of ammunition manufacturers, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Handgun Ammunition

5 Control Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. RECORDS OF DISPOSITION OF AMMUNITION.

7 (a) AMENDMENT OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES

8 CODE.—Section 923(g) of title 18, United States Code,

9 is amended—
2

•S 154 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting after the

2 second sentence the following: ‘‘Each licensed im3 porter and manufacturer of ammunition shall main4 tain such records of importation, production, ship5 ment, sale, or other disposition of ammunition at the

6 place of business of such importer or manufacturer

7 for such period and in such form as the Secretary

8 may by regulations prescribe. Such records shall in9 clude the amount, caliber, and type of ammuni10 tion.’’; and

11 (2) by adding at the end the following:

12 ‘‘(8) Each licensed importer or manufacturer of am13 munition shall annually prepare a summary report of im14 ports, production, shipments, sales, and other dispositions

15 during the preceding year. The report shall be prepared

16 on a form specified by the Secretary, shall include the

17 amounts, calibers, and types of ammunition that were dis18 posed of, and shall be forwarded to the office specified

19 thereon not later than the close of business on the date

20 specified by the Secretary.’’.

21 (b) STUDY OF CRIMINAL USE AND REGULATION OF

22 AMMUNITION.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall re23 quest the National Academy of Sciences to—
3

•S 154 IS

1 (1) prepare, in consultation with the Secretary,

2 a study of the criminal use and regulation of ammu3 nition; and

4 (2) submit to Congress, not later than July 31,

5 1998, a report with recommendations on the poten6 tial for preventing crime by regulating or restricting

7 the availability of ammunition.

8 SEC. 3. INCREASE IN LICENSING FEES FOR MANUFACTUR9 ERS OF AMMUNITION.

10 Section 923(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

11 amended—

12 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through

13 (D) as subparagraphs (B) through (E), respectively;

14 and

15 (2) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as re16 designated, the following:

17 ‘‘(A) of .25 caliber, .32 caliber, or 9 mm

18 ammunition, a fee of $10,000 per year;’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            3874
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1662
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  3175
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      22616
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          48920
<ALLOWANCE>                                        793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   82289
<DEPOSITS>                                       73150
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                552
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2160
<OTHER-SE>                                        6427
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                    8587
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   1077
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  355
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    78
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  1511
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 591
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              820
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       52
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    379
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.83
<LOANS-NON>                                        186
<LOANS-PAST>                                       917
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   782
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       45
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  793
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            793
        

</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00598

- CR

Craig Anthony Keeton

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 10

o f Ta rrant County (1306985 )

September 18, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
OFFICE 0~ THE ATTORNEY’ GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

. 
i 

parts of Title It or iho k?viccd CLVLZ 5:Gtotcs of TCX;18. 

Sections 3 oc;? 4 G? ChagtCr IV of 't&o Uuking 

cofio r&xl its f6llczs; 
:: cdlcrl mothg of stoc%hvl*cr~, 

t::o~plrgoso tllcroo~,'aoa tllo call 

until ZLftCr th0 CSfCCtiVQ d3tO Of 

z!Ac;l tLQ Call io 02 GOUt*tC r2&?. 

t110 0~11 -311oulil ctato 

itself should not lssuo 

the ba..cLn~ co&3 tutdor
No. DA 19 - 0317

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KRISTOFER BUTLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 8, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 8 2020

07/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0317
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald Howard Lane, the principal executive officer of Bionutrics, Inc., a
Nevada corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bionutrics, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and the Company
has:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: January 30, 2006                   /s/     Ronald Howard Lane
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Ronald Howard Lane,
                                                 Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Voice Assist, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donna Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Donna Moore


Donna Moore


Chief Financial Officer


May__, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative or Renee Hallman, Contact Representative, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-10440 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

***Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

I, Joel Boyarski, the Principal Financial Officer ofWorldGate Communications, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K of WorldGateCommunications, Inc., for the annual period ended December 31, 2006,which this certification accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andinformation contained in the December 31, 2006 Form 10-K fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of WorldGate Communications, Inc.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to WorldGate and will be retained by WorldGate and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated: March 15, 2007 | /s/ JOEL  BOYARSKI                                                      |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Joel Boyarski                                                           |
|                       | *Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----