alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.25



FUNCTIONAL MANAGEMENT TEAM

                                        EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





THIS AGREEMENT  is made between  EXTENDED SYSTEMS INCORPORATED (ESI)  and
  Scott
Ritchie (EMPLOYEE)  for the employment of  EMPLOYEE  by  ESI.



IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES:

	 EMPLOYMENT: ESI hereby hires EMPLOYEE and EMPLOYEE accepts employment with ESI

as VP of Operations.





	 TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT: This Agreement shall commence the 16th day of October  , 2000 and shall continue until
terminated by either party pursuant to paragraph five.




	 COMPENSATION: The EMPLOYEE shall receive as compensation for his/her services the amount of $13,440 per month plus
all employee benefits as set forth in the current issue of the Extended Systems Employee Handbook.




	 DUTIES OF EMPLOYEE: EMPLOYEE shall have the duties and authority as set forth in the job description.




	 ROLLING SIX (6) MONTH CONTRACT: This contract is a continuous, rolling
six (6) month agreement entitling employee to six (6) months termination pay, at
employees current salary, if terminated without cause or without six (6) months
written notice. In the event EMPLOYEE is removed from the Functional Management
Team (FMT) into another position within ESI, the six month notice period to
terminate this contract will automatically begin on the date EMPLOYEE ceases to
be a member of the Functional Management Team.




	 VACATION: EMPLOYEE shall accumulate paid vacation as set forth in Extended Systems Time-Off Policy.




	 TRAVEL EXPENSES: EMPLOYEE shall be reimbursed for all authorized travel and lodging expenses.




	 FRINGE BENEFITS: Fringe benefits shall be provided by ESI as set forth in the Extended Systems Employee Handbook, which is
located on the HR Intranet. I understand that I am responsible for familiarizing myself with the contents of the handbook. I
understand that the contents in the Employee Handbook are subject to change at Extended Systems' discretion and do not create any
contractual commitments by the Company.. SR (Employee Initials)





	 DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY: EMPLOYEE agrees to abide by the terms of the Extended Systems Drug and Alcohol Policy. Receipt of
Drug and Alcohol Policy is hereby acknowledged. SR (Employee Initials).





	 NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT: EMPLOYEE agrees to abide by the terms of the Extended Systems Non-Disclosure Agreement.




DATED this  16th  day of  October , 2000. 




/s/ Scott Ritchie

_________________________________

Functional Management Team Employee




/s/ Debbie Kaylor

_________________________________

Extended Systems
Exhibit
      10.6





MidWestOne
      Financial Group, Inc.


Executive
      Performance Incentive Plan


Summary





The
      compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company adopted an
      “Executive Performance Incentive Plan,” the (“Plan”) at a meeting on February
      28, 2007. The Plan was designed to provide annual incentives for executive
      officers of the Company tied to the achievement of objectives established at
      the
      beginning of each year. It replaces the current “profit-sharing” approach where
      annual incentives are a percentage of Company earnings. The Plan will apply
      to
“executive officers” of the Company, which are currently the president and the
      executive vice president of the Company and the president of the subsidiary
      bank. The objectives of the plan include broadening the range of key areas
      of
      focus, reinforcing the importance of non-financial objectives and the annual
      planning process, and increased upside reward opportunities with commensurate
      additional downside risk.





As
      part
      of the Plan, each executive officer will have a performance “scorecard”
established by the compensation committee, which will include areas of focus
      divided between financial and non-financial objectives with multiple
      sub-objectives in each area. Performance levels will be established including
      a
      minimum “threshold” at which point bonuses will begin to be earned and a
“stretch” point at which maximum bonuses may be earned. A minimum performance
      level that must be met for any bonuses to be paid was established in relation
      to
      budgeted earnings per share.





Overall
      performance of each executive officer will be determined by the committee in
      one
      composite rating based on a combined quantitative and qualitative assessment
      of
      the individual executive officer’s performance during the year versus the
      scorecard. Threshold bonuses will equal 10 percent of salary of each executive
      officer. Performance greater than threshold will result in bonuses ranging
      from
      10 percent to a maximum of 40 percent of salary, as determined through
      straight-line interpolation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Friday, June 4, 2010 and Saturday, June 5, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Friday, June 4, 2010 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Saturday, June 5, 2010 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Eastern Time in Brooklyn, NY. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

*The agenda will include various IRS issues*.                

                        Dated:                         *May 3, 2010*.                    

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-10744 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Nigar Lila, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dolat Ventures, Inc

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant  as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and I have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to me, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles

c.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's forth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

1.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

By: /s/ Nigar Lila

Nigar Lila
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Date: January 6, 2009
(December 6, 1923.)

#### W. T. BOOTH, Plaintiff, v. ETHEL T. CLARK, as County Treasurer and *Ex-officio*Tax Collector of Ada County, Idabo, Defendant.

[222 Pac. 779.]

Original proceeding for writ of mandate.

*Writ issued.*

Richards & Haga and Charles H. Darling, for Plaintiff.

A. H. Conner, Attorney General, James L. Boone, Assistant, Laurel Elam and Carl A. Burke, for Defendant.

Fred C. Erb, George Donart, Harris, Stinson & Harris, J. B. Eldridge, E'. A. Walters, R. P. Parry and J. A. Gal-laher, *Amici Curiae.*

BUDGE, C. J.

— This is an original application for writ of *mandamus*directed to defendant, as county treasurer and *ex-officio*tax collector of Ada county, Idaho', directing her to accept delinquent taxes and interest thereon and to issue to plaintiff proper receipts and a tax deed therefor. The facts and questions of law are substantially the same as those presented to this court in the case of *Washington County v. Paradis, ante,*p. 364, 222 Pac. 775. Upon the authority of that ease it is ordered that the writ issue. Costs are awarded to plaintiff.

McCarthy, Dunn, William A. Lee and Wm. E. Lee, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 302(a) OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      Colin
      Halpern, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Universal Services Group,
      Inc.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report; and




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report.


DATE:
              August 15, 2007/s/
                COLIN HALPERNColin
                HalpernChief
                Executive Officer and
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COLE J. KAZICKAS,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 129 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302



I, Jonathan M. Rothberg, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report of CuraGen Corporation; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: June 16, 2004



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.       
|Jonathan M. Rothberg, Ph.D.           
|Chief Executive Officer, President and
|Chairman of the Board
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51182 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE MORENO-CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-1115-DB-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Moreno-Contreras appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Moreno-Contreras contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Moreno-Contreras maintains thatNo. 03-51182 -2- he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Moreno-Contreras acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a  14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

I, Charles S. Howard, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ Charles S. Howard                
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00548-CR

Deloes Ockleberry, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 56109, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Deloes Ockleberry, Jr., pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation. See Tex.

Pen. Code Ann. § 30.02 (West 2003). The court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment,

enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for life and a $2500 fine.

Ockleberry’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by demonstrating that the only arguable contentions that might support the appeal are

ultimately without merit. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v.
2

State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.

1969).

As was his right, Ockleberry filed a pro se brief. His primary complaint is that his

trial attorney did not provide effective assistance. Ockleberry asserts that counsel failed to

investigate the facts of the case and failed to produce evidence, including testimony by family

members and friends, regarding Ockleberry’s mental illness. He also urges that counsel was

ineffective for having urged him to plead guilty knowing that he was mentally ill and under the

influence of medication.

The record contains a copy of the presentence investigation report. This report states

that Ockleberry takes medication for depression. There is no indication, however, that he is mentally

ill. Both he and his attorney assured the trial court that he was competent, and there is nothing in

the record to suggest otherwise. There is no evidence to support any of Ockleberry’s other

complaints regarding his attorney. He has not overcome the presumption that counsel rendered

reasonable professional assistance. See Jackson v. State, 877 S.W.2d 768, 771 (Tex. Crim. App.

1994).

Ockleberry also urges that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to take into

account his mental health history in assessing punishment. Given Ockleberry’s criminal record, the

punishment assessed was within the range prescribed for the offense. There is no basis in the record

for finding an abuse of discretion.

We have reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and the pro se brief. We find nothing

in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
3

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: March 17, 2005

Do Not Publish
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 18, 2019

NO. 03-19-00601-CR

Ronnie Allan Kneeland, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.