alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

 I, Fred W. Brackebusch, certify that: 

 (1)        I have reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-KSB of New Jersey Mining Company. 

 (2)        Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of  the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with  respect to the period covered by this report;

 (3)        Based on my knowledge,  the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,  fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of  operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this report;

 (4)        I am responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer  and have: 

(a)        Designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls  and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material  information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly  during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)        Not required;

(c)        Evaluated  the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this  report based on such evaluation; and 

(d)        Disclosed  in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over  financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent  fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case  of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to  materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial  reporting; and

 (5)        I have disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation of  internal control over financial reporting , to the small business issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors  (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)        All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal  control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect  the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report  financial information; and

(b)        Any fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have  a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial  reporting.

 Date: June  3, 2005 

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCH  Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer & Director 

----
jf ourtlj Court of

Sntouio,

March 30,2015

No.04-14-00540-CV

Levi and Michelle McKenzie,

Appellants

v.

Community National Bank.

Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 13-05-21 843-CV

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in ibis appeal and has determined that oral

argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on May 12. 2015. to the following panel: Justice

Marialyn Barnard. Justice Patricia 0. Alvarez, and Justice Jason Pulliam. All parties will be

notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX, R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file- motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. Al'P. P, 39.8. Such motion should be filed within ten (10)

days from the dale of this order.

It is so ORDERED on March 30, 2015.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF

court on this March 30. 201 5.

Marialwn Barnardc/Justiee

have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

tile. Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 OF MAHASKA INVESTMENT COMPANY AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,049
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,002
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,767
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,502
<LOANS>                                        117,638
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,163
<DEPOSITS>                                     204,447
<SHORT-TERM>                                    18,425
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,913
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,423
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 259,163
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,759
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  778
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,474
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,011
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,046
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,376
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,635
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      208
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (56)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,680
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,101
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   10.30
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,529
<LOANS-PAST>                                       678
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   375
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               (1,267)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       33
<RECOVERIES>                                       (5)
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              (1,447)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           (1,447)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        (1,332)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 24741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1906-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1906-DR), dated April 29, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 29, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of April 29, 2010.

    Attala, Holmes, and Warren Counties for Individual Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.


W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-10547 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 31.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   I, Steven
Berman, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Wi-Max Communications,
Inc.;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I
have:
  a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
  c)  presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
  5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
  a)  all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  6. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  Date:
      August 23, 2010By:
                    /s/
      Steven BermanSteven
      BermanChief
      Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 98-60033 Summmary Calendar

__________________ AMIN BHIMINI, Petitioner,
versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A70 634 337
- - - - - - - - - - - January 21, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Amin Bhimini petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for asylum and for a withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of the Powerdyne International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:





The Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
Dale EugaPresident, Director,Chief Executive Officer


Date: December 23, 2011
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 23, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23

- 1354 Lower Tribunal No. 20

- 12542

________________ 

### Olga Vakulovska, Appellant,

vs. 

### Sergii Vakulovskyi, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Marlene Fernandez

- Karavetsos , Judge. Olga Vakulovska , in proper person

. No Appearance , for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON and GORDO , JJ. PER CURIAM.2 ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Olga Vakulovska seeks appellate review of an order of final judgment of dissolution of marriage and an order denying her motion to amend or alter the judgment, impute income and sanctions. On July 26, 2023, this Court ordered Vakulovska to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. We find Vakulovska’s notice of appeal was untimely , which renders this Court without appellate jurisdiction to review the orders on appeal.
T his Court’s jurisdiction is invoked by the filing of a notice of appeal “with the clerk of the lower tribunal withi n 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed

. . . . ” Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). The underlying final judgment at issue was entered on March 9, 2023. Vakulovska did not file her notice of appeal until July 23, 2023

— 136 days after rendition of the order she asks this Court to review

. She argues, however, that her subsequent motion to amend the final judgment tolled rendition of the final judgment. Florida Rul e of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h)(1)(D) provides that an authorized and timely filed motion to alter or amend tolls rendition of an order. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(g) , “[a] motion to alter or amend the judgment shall be served not later than 15 days after the date of filing of the judgment

. . . . ” Vakulovska file d her motion to amend or alter3 the judgment on March 30, 2023 , after the fifteen

- day deadline expired. As the relevant motion to amend was untimely, we find it did not t oll rendition of the final judgment. See Hemmerle v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. , 680 So. 2d 1091, 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (noting that “[i]f the [rule 1.530] motion . . . was not timely served, it would not toll the time for taking the appeal”).
Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25110-25111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10727]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Prisons

28 CFR Part 540

[BOP-1149]
RIN 1120-AB49


Inmate Communication With News Media: Removal of Byline 
Regulations

AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice Department.

ACTION: Interim final rule; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 25111]]

SUMMARY: This document corrects the dates section of an interim final 
rule published on Friday, April 23, 2010. In the interim rule, the 
Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) revised its regulations regarding inmate 
contact with the community to remove two current Bureau regulations 
that prohibit inmates from publishing under a byline, due to a recent 
court ruling invalidating Bureau regulation language containing this 
prohibition. The April 23, 2010, publication inadvertently omitted an 
effective date.

DATES: The interim final rule published April 23, 2010, at 75 FR 21163, 
is effective May 7, 2010. Comments are due by June 22nd, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 
320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, Office of General 
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 307-2105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document corrects the DATES section of 
the publication on Friday, April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21163). The dates 
section of that document should read as follows: ``This rule is 
effective on [insert date of publication]. Comments are due by June 
22nd, 2010.'' However, because that document did not include an 
effective date, this document announces the effective date of those 
provisions.

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 540

    Prisoners.

Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
[FR Doc. 2010-10727 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1868

ELLA V. MCCUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ILANA ROBBINS WEST, M.D., Doctor; HAGERSTOWN

SURGICAL CLINIC, a partnership,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-97-4182-JFM)

Submitted: February 26, 1999 Decided: April 7, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Andrew Cronin, CRONIN & SCARDINO, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania;

Sharon N. Horner, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Frederick W.

Goundry, III, VARNER & KASLICK, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ella McCue appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of the Defendants in her suit alleging negligence, lack of informed consent, and assault and battery arising

from the medical treatment Dr. West provided her at the Hagerstown

Surgical Clinic. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCue v. West,

No. CA-97-4182-JFM (D. Md. May 12, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IB 

House Calendar No. 171 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 577 

[Report No. 115–839] 

To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude Frazier Mountain. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2017 

Ms. TITUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

JULY 18, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 577 RH

A BILL 

To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as Maude 

Frazier Mountain. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 577 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MAUDE FRAZIER MOUNTAIN 

4 IN THE STATE OF NEVADA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The peak of Frenchman Moun6 tain located at latitude 36°10′45′′ N, by longitude 

7 114°59′52′′ W in the State of Nevada shall be known and 

8 designated as ‘‘Maude Frazier Mountain’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, record, or other paper of the United 

11 States to the peak referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

12 deemed to be a reference to ‘‘Maude Frazier Mountain’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 171 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 577 

[Report No. 115–839] 

A BILL 

To designate a peak in the State of Nevada as 

Maude Frazier Mountain. 

JULY 18, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.3



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Concord EFS, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward T. Haslam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Dated: November 7, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concord EFS, Inc. and will be retained by Concord EFS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.