alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mewbourne Energy Partners 08-A, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:                 May 17, 2010



/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. MewbourneChief Executive OfficerMewbourne Development Corporation,Managing General Partner of the Registrant
#### Howard G. Conner *v.*Honorable Arthur P. Hudson, *Judge, etc.*

(No. 8513)

Submitted November 11, 1936.

Decided December 1, 1936.

*W. E. R. Byrne,*for relator.

*D. W. Taylor,*for respondent.

Litz, Judge:

The relator, Howard G. Conner, seeks a writ of mandamus commanding respondent, The Honorable Arthur P. Hudson, as Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, to vacate an order dismissing an action in ejectment, restore the case to the trial docket and proceed in due course with the trial thereof.

The action of ejectment, in which the relator is plaintiff, and Earl Jarrett, Dorothy K. Jarrett and Frank Mayer are defendants, involves the location of the *65division line between two adjoining parcels of land in Kanawha County, owned by relator and defendant, Dorothy K. Jarrett, respectively. At the trial of the case in July, 1935, the court declined to receive a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and directed the jury to reconsider the issue in accordance with specific instructions submitted for its guidance. After further' deliberating and reporting its inability to agree, the jury was discharged and the trial of the action continued to the next term of court. Thereafter, the case was continued from term to term, and on August 6, 1936, the court, without a hearing and over the objection of the parties,- entered an order, deciding the issue between the parties and dismissing the action. The court, in summarily dealing with the controversy, seems to have been influenced by the insignificant value of the subject matter as compared with the probable costs of another trial. This basis of decision is not recognized by our present judicial system. The court may have directed a verdict at the trial or re-tried the case by agreement of the parties, but could not of its own motion enter judgment without a hearing.

Mandamus is an appropriate remedy to correct acts of inferior tribunals in excess of their jurisdiction, where there is no other adequate remedy. *Virginia*v. *Rives,*100 U. S. 313, 25 L. Ed. 667; *State*v. *Nutter,*99 W. Va. 146, 128 S. E. 142. The remedy by writ of error would not be adequate in this case for the reason that, as there is no record on the merits, the appellate court could only remand the cause for trial in accordance with recognized legal procedure. “Mandamus will not be denied on the ground that there is another remedy, unless such other remedy is equally convenient, beneficial, and effective.” *Hardin*v. *Foglesong et al.,*117 W. Va. 544, 186 S. E. 308.

*Writ awarded.*
|                 | (1)                     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|----------------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |
|                 | (2)                     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                 |
|                 |
| Date: August 7. 2009 | By: /s/ Owen Farren     |
|                 | Owen Farren             |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |
|                 |
|                 |
|                 |
Exhibit
99.2






CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Brand
Neue Corp. (the “Company”) for the six months ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Adi Muljo,
Chief Executive Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
  1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.
The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
   Date:
February
5, 2010
   ADI
MULJO
 Adi
Muljo
 Chief
Executive Officer
 and
Director
#### State of West Virginia *v.*Howard Fowler

(No. 8407)

Submitted October 14, 1936.

Decided October 20, 1936.

*762
      *Barnhart & Trotter,*for plaintiff in error.

*Homer A. Holt,*Attorney General, and *Kenneth E. Hines,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hatcher, President:

The defendant was indicted, convicted and sentenced upon a charge of knowingly receiving stolen parts of an automobile.

The state proved the theft of the car, the defendant’s possession of the parts from the car, the finding of the body of the car in a field several hundred feet from the public road, and his proximity thereto on one occasion. The field was a number of miles from his home. He explained, without contradiction, that when seen near the car, he and several companions were enroute to a bootlegger and were attracted to the car from the road. He proved that the car had been wrecked, and admitted virtually stripping it of every usuable part, except the engine, which had already been removed. He testified that other stripped cars were in that “immediate vicinity.” The state proved specifically that' only the one car was in that field. He testified that the car contained no identifying marks when-he found it. The state showed that even after he had stripped the car, it still bore a current license plate. He testified that he hauled the parts away openly. The state produced testimony that the parts were covered with a tarpaulin while in transit.

Receiving stolen goods is a specific statutory crime. Code, 61-3-18; *State*v. *Smith,*98 W. Va. 185, 188, 126 S. E. 703; *State*v. *Frankel,*1 W. W. Harr. (Del.) 372, 114 A. 608; Wharton’s Crim. Law (12th Ed.), section *7631229. Due to different statutory phraseology, definitions of the crime in other jurisdictions are not helpful. Under our statute, it consists of one person receiving “from another person” the stolen goods (in bad faith), knowing or having reason to believe them stolen. Thus two persons are contemplated by the statute: (1) the original thief or a successor in criminal possession of the stolen goods, and (2) a person to whom that possession is transferred. The statute must be construed strictly. *State*v. *Smith, supra.*Consequently, the mere discovery and appropriation of stolen goods by a person does not constitute this statutory crime.

Since the car was in view from the public road, the mere fact that defendant observed it, does not imply a prior delivery of the car to him at that place by another person. There is no proof of any concert or connection whatever between the defendant and a former wrongful possessor of the car, nor proof from which such concert or connection can legitimately be inferred. Consequently, whatever crime, if any, the defendant committed, the state has failed to sustain the charge herein, for want of proof that *he received the stolen goods from another person.*

The judgment is reversed, the verdict of the jury set aside, and a new trial awarded.

*Judgment reversed; verdict set aside; neiu trial awarded.*
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## CO URT OFAPPEA LS SE COND DIST RIC TO F TE XAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 45 1- CV I N R E P R E M I E R T R AI L E R L E AS I NG, I NC . R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NAL P R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u rth a s c o n s id e re d re la t o r ’s p e t it io n fo r w r ito f m a n d a m u s a n d is of t he opi ni on t hatrel i ef s houl d be de ni ed. Accordi ngl y, rel at or’ s pe t i t i on for w r i tof m and am us i s den i ed. R el at or shal l pay al l cost s of t h i s o ri g i n al proceedi ng, for w hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. BI LL M EI ER J U S T I C E PA N EL: M EI ER, W A LKER, an d M C C O Y, JJ. M C C O Y , J . w o u l d g ran t. DEL I VERE D: F e brua r y 10, 2010
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 USC Section 1350 (A) and (B)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of F & M Bank Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Dated:  November 13, 2009
    /s/  DEAN W. WITHERSDean W. WithersPresident & Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, June 16, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, June 16, 2010, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marianne Ayala. For more information please contact Mrs. Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

*The agenda will include various IRS issues.*

Dated: May 3, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-10743 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6059 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

51 Willow Street in Lynn, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Thomas P. Costin, 

Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2018 

Mr. MOULTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 51 Willow Street in Lynn, Massachusetts, 

as the ‘‘Thomas P. Costin, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THOMAS P. COSTIN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 51 Willow Street in Lynn, Mas7 sachusetts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas 

8 P. Costin, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6059 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Thomas P. Costin, 

5 Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Walll Builders Ltd.,(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended Sept.30th, 2008as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Tian Jia, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Dated
this 10thday of September 30th,
2008









/s/ Tian
Jia






Tian
Jia






Chief
Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1516

AN ACT

To amend title III of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331 et seq.) to reauthorize

the Federal Emergency Management Food and Shelter

Program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1516 ES

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

3 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as

4 follows:

5 ‘‘SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

6 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

7 this title $125,000,000 for fiscal year 2000, $130,000,000

8 for fiscal year 2001, and $135,000,000 for fiscal year

9 2002.’’.

10 SEC. 2. NAME CHANGE TO NOMINATING ORGANIZATION.

11 Section 301(b) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

12 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331(b)) is amended by strik13 ing paragraph (5) and inserting the following:

14 ‘‘(5) United Jewish Communities.’’.

15 SEC. 3. PARTICIPATION OF HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS ON

16 LOCAL BOARDS.

17 Section 316(a) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

18 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11346(a)) is amended by strik19 ing paragraph (6) and inserting the following:

20 ‘‘(6) guidelines requiring each local board to in21 clude in their membership not less than 1 homeless

22 individual, former homeless individual, homeless ad23 vocate, or recipient of food or shelter services, except

24 that such guidelines may waive such requirement for

25 any board unable to meet such requirement if the

26 board otherwise consults with homeless individuals,
3

S 1516 ES

1 former homeless individuals, homeless advocates, or

2 recipients of food or shelter services.’’.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1516

AN ACT

To amend title III of the Stewart B. McKinney

Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331 etseq.) to reauthorize the Federal Emergency Management Food and Shelter Program, and forother purposes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           	   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1999
<S>                              <C>
<CASH>                           17,558
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>              450
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                 75,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>           0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>          106,140
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>            106,140
<LOANS>                         240,782
<ALLOWANCE>                       9,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  465,446
<DEPOSITS>                      429,429
<SHORT-TERM>                          0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>               5,032
<LONG-TERM>                           0
<COMMON>                          2,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                       29,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>  465,446
<INTEREST-LOAN>                   4,857
<INTEREST-INVEST>                 1,514
<INTEREST-OTHER>                    967
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                  7,338
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                4,191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                4,191
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>             3,147
<LOAN-LOSSES>                       566
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                  553
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                   3,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     355
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          355
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                        256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                     0.23
<LOANS-NON>                      22,200
<LOANS-PAST>                      3,948
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                  1,186
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                  12,618
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                 10,137
<CHARGE-OFFS>                     1,943
<RECOVERIES>                        566
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                 9,327
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>              9,327
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>               0
        

</TABLE>