alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2016

No. 04-16-00063-CV

TEAL TRADING AND DEVELOPMENT, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

CHAMPEE SPRINGS RANCHES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 06-500A

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief 

is due on October 10, 2016. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 11.1  Celestica Finance Code of Professional Conduct  The Board of Directors
has adopted this Finance Code of Professional Conduct (the Code) for
Celesticas Chief Executive Officer, its senior finance officers, and all
personnel in the finance organization (Finance Professionals), to deter
wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct in the practice of financial
management; full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure; and
compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Finance Professionals
are expected to abide by this Code as well as Celesticas Business Conduct
Guidelines and all other applicable Celestica business policies, standards and
guidelines.  As a Finance Professional
you will:  1.Act with honesty and integrity.  2.Avoid actual or apparent conflicts of
interest between your personal and professional relationships and never use or
attempt to use your position to obtain any improper personal benefit for
yourself, your family, or any other person.  3.Ensure that Celesticas disclosure is
full, fair, accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable,
including in Celesticas filings with and other submissions to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.  4.Comply with all applicable rules and
regulations of federal, state, provincial and local governments, and other
appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.  5.Act in good faith, responsibly, with due
care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing
your independent judgment to be subordinated.  6.Respect the confidentiality of
information acquired in the course of your work except when authorized or
otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Confidential information acquired in
the course of your work will not be used for personal advantage.  7.Not unduly or fraudulently influence,
coerce, manipulate, or mislead any authorized audit or interfere with any
auditor engaged in the performance of an internal or independent audit of
Celesticas financial statements or accounting books and records.  If you are aware of any
suspected or known violations of this Code, you have a duty to promptly report
such concerns to the Chief Financial Officer or the Chief Legal Officer and to
the Chairman of the Audit Committee.


You understand that you
will be held accountable for your adherence to this Code. Your failure to
observe the terms of this Code may result in disciplinary action, up to and
including termination of employment. Violations of this Code may also
constitute violations of law and may result in civil and criminal penalties for
you and/or Celestica.  It is Celesticas
intention that this Code of Professional Conduct be its written code of ethics
under Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 complying with the
standards set forth in Item 16B of Form 20-F promulgated under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IB

House Calendar No. 195

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1567

[Report No. 106–552]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

MARCH 29, 2000

Reported with amendments, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to

be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 223

Broad Street in Albany, Georgia, as the ‘‘C.B. King

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 223 Broad

5 Street in Albany, Georgia, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘C.B. King United States Courthouse’’.
2

•S 1567 RH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘C.B. King United States Court6 house’’.

7 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

8 The United States courthouse located at 223 Broad Av9 enue in Albany, Georgia, shall be known and designated

10 as the ‘‘C.B. King United States Courthouse’’.

11 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

12 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

13 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

14 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

15 to be a reference to the ‘‘C.B. King United States Court16 house’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to designate

the United States courthouse located at 223 Broad Avenue in Albany, Georgia, as the ‘C.B. King United States

Courthouse’.’’.

House Calendar No. 195

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1567

[Report No. 106–552]

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

at 223 Broad Street in Albany, Georgia, as the‘‘C.B. King United States Courthouse’’.

MARCH 29, 2000

Reported with amendments, referred to the House

Calendar, and ordered to be printed
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAMELA KAY SCOTT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. COLIN HAYES; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 35682

D.C. No. 3:17

- cv
- 05619

- BHS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15 , 2017 **

Before: CANBY , TROTT , and GRABER , Circuit Judges. Pamela Kay Scott appeals pro se from th e district court’s order denying her
application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging
claims relating to her criminal sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We re view for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to proceed IFP ,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 22 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35682

and de novo a determination that a complaint lacks arguable substance in law or

fact

. Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Tr

. , 821 F.2d 1368, 1369 (9th Cir. 1987). W e affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand

.
The district court pro perly dismissed the claims against the prosecutor
defendants on the basis of prosecutorial immunity

. See id. at 1370 (district court
may deny leave to proceed IFP “at the outset if it appears from the face of the
proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit” (citation and
internal quotation marks omitted ); see also Cousins v. Lockyer , 568 F.3d 1063,

1068

- 69 (9th Cir. 2009) (explaining p rosecutorial immunity).
However, the district court did not expressly consider Scott’s claims that
defendants from the Washing ton Department of Corrections were responsible for
incorrectly recommending that Scott’s sentence should be extended , nor did it

consider whether leave to amend these claims would be appropriate

. See Cousins ,
568 F.3d at 10 69

- 70 (discussing the constitutional right to be free from wrongful

incarceration , and whether corrections officials were entitled to qualified
immunity ) ; see also Rodriguez v. Steck , 795 F.3d 1187, 1188 (9th Cir. 2015 ) (“[A]

district court’ s denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis is an abuse of
discretion unless the district court first provides a plaintiff leave to amend the3 17

- 35682

complaint or finds that amendment would be futile.” )

. We vacate the denial of
leave to proceed IFP, vacate in part the order filed on October 5, 2017 dismissing
plaintiff’s action, and remand for further proceedings as to these defendants only

.
Scott’s motion to file a substitute or corrected brief (D ocket Entry No. 11) is
granted. The C lerk shall file the open ing brief submitted at Docket Entry No. 13
and strike the opening brief filed at Docket Entry No. 7.

AFFIRMED in part , VACATED in part , and REMANDED

.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING II, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED            FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 6, 1997
                                    DECEMBER 31, 1999                  DECEMBER 25, 1998                 TO DECEMBER 26, 1997
                          ----------------------------------  ---------------------------------  -----------------------------------
                            MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH
                              PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED        PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED
                          CAPITAL TRUST II  FUNDING II, L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST II FUNDING II, L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST II  FUNDING II, L.P.
                          ----------------  ----------------  ---------------- ----------------   ----------------  ----------------

<S>                        <C>                <C>                <C>              <C>               <C>            <C>

Earnings                         $ 24,742          $ 29,003            $ 24,742        $ 29,017           $ 22,268          $ 26,112
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========           ========          ========


Fixed charges                    $      -          $      -            $      -        $      -           $      -          $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution requirements         24,000            24,742              24,000          24,742             21,600            22,268
                                 --------          --------            --------        --------           --------          --------

Total combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
     distributions               $ 24,000          $ 24,742            $ 24,000        $ 24,742           $ 21,600          $ 22,268
                                 ========          ========            ========        ========           ========          ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 securities distributions            1.03              1.17                1.03            1.17               1.03              1.17


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1688
HUMBERTO FORERO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JOSEPH H. CLOONAN, Director; PAT WAGNER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-3648-HAR) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 24, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Humberto Forero, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Regina Sherry Moriarty, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his tax refund suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Forero v. IRS , No. CA-95-3648-HAR (D. Md. Apr. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.8





 


		
        Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals,
        Inc.

        1760 E. River Road, Suite 250

        Tucson, AZ 85718

        Phone: 520-908-7774



 


August 29, 2013


 


Christopher Richied


 


Dear Chris,


 


I am pleased to inform you that, effective September 2, 2013, your
employment with CPP will be as a full-time, regular employee. You will be paid at a full-time rate based on an annual salary of
$220,000, which represent an increase in salary of $ 118,000.00 over your present compensation.


 


Thank you for your exemplary contributions to CPP. I look forward
to achieving great things together at Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals.


 


	 	Sincerely,		 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Jeff Jacob	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Jeff Jacob	 	Agreed to and Accepted by:	 
	 	CEO	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	/s/ Christopher Richied	 
	 	 	 	 	Date:	 	 


 





 



www.CanPrevent.com
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1681

To extend the authority of the Thomas Paine National Historical Association

to establish a memorial to Thomas Paine in the District of Columbia.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 1, 1999

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Rules and Administration

A BILL

To extend the authority of the Thomas Paine National Historical Association to establish a memorial to Thomas

Paine in the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISH4 MENT OF THOMAS PAINE MEMORIAL.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Public Law 102–407 (40 U.S.C.

6 1003 note; 106 Stat. 1991) is amended by adding at the

7 end the following:

8 ‘‘SEC. 4. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

9 ‘‘Notwithstanding the time period limitation specified

10 in section 10(b) of the Commemorative Works Act (40
2

•S 1681 IS

1 U.S.C. 1010(b)) or any other provision of law, the author2 ity for the Thomas Paine National Historical Association

3 to establish a memorial to Thomas Paine in the District

4 of Columbia under this Act shall expire on December 31,

5 2003.’’.

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

7 (1) APPLICABLE LAW.—Section 1(b) of Public

8 Law 102–407 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 106 Stat.

9 1991) is amended by striking ‘‘The establishment’’

10 and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in section 4, the

11 establishment’’.

12 (2) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 3 of

13 Public Law 102–407 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 106

14 Stat. 1991) is amended—

15 (A) by striking ‘‘or upon expiration of the

16 authority for the memorial under section 10(b)

17 of that Act,’’ and inserting ‘‘or on expiration of

18 the authority for the memorial under section

19 4,’’; and

20 (B) by striking ‘‘section 8(b)(1) of that

21 Act’’ and inserting ‘‘section 8(b)(1) of the Com22 memorative Works Act (40 U.S.C.

23 1008(b)(1))’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 153 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 153

   To prohibit the use of certain ammunition, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the use of certain ammunition, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Destructive Ammunition Prohibition 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    Section 921(a)(17) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(D) The term `destructive ammunition' means any jacketed, hollow 
point projectile that may be used in a handgun and the jacket of which 
is designed to produce, upon impact, sharp-tipped, barb-like 
projections that extend beyond the diameter of the unfired 
projectile.''.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION.

    Section 922(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (7), by inserting ``or destructive'' after 
        ``armor piercing''; and
            (2) in paragraph (8), by inserting ``or destructive'' after 
        ``armor piercing''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            2946
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              10
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      15216
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          64090
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (1141)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   88490
<DEPOSITS>                                       76808
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1552
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2160
<OTHER-SE>                                        7970
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   10130
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   4271
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  765
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    98
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  5134
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1785
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3290
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      205
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1314
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1314
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       869
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.37
<LOANS-NON>                                        707
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1658
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   965
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       48
<RECOVERIES>                                        19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1141
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1141


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,131,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,286,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,009,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,706,079
<PP&E>                                       5,677,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,280,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,850,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        157
<COMMON>                                        82,024
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,731,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,280,562
<SALES>                                      3,029,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,029,973
<CGS>                                        1,750,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,750,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,563,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (189,994)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (456,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,339)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (460,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (460,786)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>