alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Brooks Sherman, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this Report) of Integrated Security Systems, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting;



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 20, 2009

/s/ BROOKS SHERMAN

Brooks Sherman

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of A.G.F.W., a Minor Child

No. 06-12-00111-CV

Appeal from the 6th District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 73,540). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 6, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5935 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5935

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1355 North Meridian Road in Harristown, Illinois, as the ``Logan S. 
                         Palmer Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2018

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Bost, Mr. 
  Kinzinger, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Shimkus, Mrs. Bustos, Ms. 
 Schakowsky, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Quigley, Ms. Kelly of 
   Illinois, Mr. Rush, Mr. Foster, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. 
Krishnamoorthi, and Mr. Gutierrez) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1355 North Meridian Road in Harristown, Illinois, as the ``Logan S. 
                         Palmer Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOGAN S. PALMER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1355 North Meridian Road in Harristown, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Logan S. Palmer Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Logan S. 
Palmer Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 7 , 2014 

# Order

Clerk October 7 , 2014

148347 (43)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICH IGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148347

COA: 308999

Wayne CC: 11

- 002103

- FC

RANDALL SCOTT OVERTON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of amicus curiae Prosecuting Attorneys

Association of Michigan to extend the time for filing its amicus curiae brief is

GRANTED. The brief submitted on September 26, 2014, is accepted for filing.
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  for the period ended May 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Amico Games Corp. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  July 15, 2010 |                                  |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                            | /s/Peter Liu                          |
|                            | Peter Liu                             |
|                            | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                            | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|                            | Amico Games Corp.                     |
|                            |                                  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,256,000
<SECURITIES>                                66,414,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,398,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,600,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            86,256,000
<PP&E>                                       2,196,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 402,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,170,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,874,000
<BONDS>                                        384,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       215,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  82,442,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,170,000
<SALES>                                      5,594,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,594,000
<CGS>                                       15,593,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,571,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               150,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             230,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (34,631,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (34,631,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (1,019,00)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (35,650,000)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.13)
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of computing net loss per common share, net loss has been reduced
by the accretion on preferred stock.
</FN>


</TABLE>
___________ No. 95-3228

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Kenny Robertson, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 30, 1996 Filed: June 7, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kenny Rob ertson appeals his conviction following his guilty plea to beinga felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C . § 922(g)(1). Relying on United States v. Lopez , 115 S. Ct. 1624 (1995), Robertson argues that Congress lacks the authority to make a felon's mere posse ssionof a firearm a federal crime. Robertson's argument i s foreclosed, however, by our holding in United States v. Rankin , 64 F.3 d 338, 339 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 577 (1995). We thus affirm the judgment of conviction. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-83,709-01 and -02

EX PARTE PETER JOHN ELLINGTON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W416-82711-09-HC1 and HC2 IN THE 416th DISTRICT COURT

FROM COLLIN COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count

of aggravated sexual assault of a child and one count of indecency with a child. He was sentenced

to imprisonment for fifty-four years on the first count and twenty years’ imprisonment on the second

count. 

On June 24, 2015, an order designating issues was signed by the trial court in each
application. The applications, while forwarded to this Court properly bythe district clerk, were sent 1

here without the designated issues have been resolved by the trial court. Therefore, we remand 2

these applications to the 416th District Court of Collin County to allow the trial judge to complete

an evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. 

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 23, 2015

Do not publish 

 The document signed by the trial court is styled as a “memorandum,” but it designates 1

issues for resolution. Therefore, it is being treated as an order designating issues.

 According to the record, the State received a copy of the habeas applications on May 18, 2

2015, and the trial court’s orders were signed outside of the allowable time limit set out in TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3.
Order entered December 6 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 01025
- CV SAMANTHA LOCKETT, Appellant

V. BACHARY MCGRUDER, Appellee On Appeal from the 302nd Jud icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 13
- 11935



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due October 25, 2016

. On October 26, 2016, w hen the record had not been filed , we directed t he cou r t reporter to file t he record within thirty days. By separate letter, w e also informed her that, because appellant’s August 26, 2016 affidavit of indigency had not been contested, the record, if requested, should be filed without prepayment. To date, however, we have not re ceived a response

. Accordingly, we ORDER court reporter Elizabeth Griffin to file, no later than December 20, 2016, either (1) the reporter’s record or (2) written verification no hearing s were recorded or appellant has not requested the record. We noti fy appellant that if we receive verification the reporter’s record has not been requested, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 37.3(c).We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order to (1) the Honorable

Tena Callahan, Presiding Judge of the 302 nd Judicial District Court; (2) Ms. Griffin; and (3) the parties.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5

<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NEW JERSEY MINING
               COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
               IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<MULTIPLIER>   1

<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,722
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,722
<PP&E>                                         280,430
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 477,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       720,899
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   477,810
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,828
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,414
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,492)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)



</TABLE>
#### Floyd Burns *v.*Mary Burns

(No. 8806)

Submitted January 17, 1939.

Decided January 31, 1939.

*W. H.*Haynes, for appellant.

Hatcher, Judge:

In this suit, a divorce is sought upon the charge of desertion. The circuit court refused the divorce.

The plaintiff proved that his wife, without good cause known to him, voluntarily left their home at Alderson on February 16, 1936, and would not return; that shortly afterwards he accepted a position at Fayetteville, where, after arranging for rooms, he requested her to live with him there, and she refused; and that she had continued obdurate and had never resumed marital relations to the very time depositions were taken, to-wit, April 19, 1938. She did not answer or otherwise appear.

The husband, within reasonable limits, has the right to select the matrimonial domicil. If the wife, without good reason, rejects his selection and terminates marital relations, she is a deserter. *Walker*v. Walker, 109 W. Va. 662, 664, 155 S. E. 903; Schouler, Marriage, etc. (6th Ed.), *14sec. 1641; 17 Am. Jur., Domicil, sec. 38, *et seq.*Consequently, the defendant here was a deserter and the plaintiff is entitled to his divorce.

The decree is reversed, and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Wall Builders Ltd., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended three months ended March 31,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Tian Jia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 12, 2010









Great Wall Builders Ltd.,






/s/ Tian Jia




Tian Jia




CEO/CFO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned, Brooks F. Sherman, the chief executive officer of Integrated Security Systems, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and;

(ii)

the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.





May 11, 2010

/s/ BROOKS F SHERMAN

Brooks F. Sherman

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Integrated Security Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries



|                                                       |  |                              
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary Name                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                                       | 
|Nanogen Advanced Diagnostics, S.r.L.                   |  | Italy                        
|Nanogen Point-of-Care Inc.(formerly SynX Pharma, Inc.) |  | Canada                       
|Epoch Biosciences, Inc.                                |  | Delaware                     
|Nanogen Europe B.V.                                    |  | Netherlands                  
|Nanotronics, Inc.                                      |  | California                   
|Nanogen Recognomics GmbH (majority-owned)              |  | Germany                      
|Delta Point Cardiac Diagnostics, Inc.                  |  | Barbados
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1513

For the relief of Jacqueline Salinas and her children Gabriela Salinas,

Alejandro Salinas, and Omar Salinas.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 5, 1999

Mr. THOMPSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Jacqueline Salinas and her children Gabriela

Salinas, Alejandro Salinas, and Omar Salinas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Jacqueline Salinas and her children

7 Gabriela Salinas, Alejandro Salinas, and Omar Salinas,

8 shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admit9 ted to the United States for permanent residence as of
2

•S 1513 IS

1 the date of enactment of this Act upon payment of the

2 required visa fees.

3 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF VISAS.

4 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Jac5 queline Salinas and her children Gabriela Salinas,

6 Alejandro Salinas, and Omar Salinas, as provided in this

7 Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer

8 to reduce by the appropriate number during the current

9 fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available

10 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

11 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

12 1153(a)).

Æ