Affidavits


momen eee ee eee 7 3 LgL-zze-008rk IFS
[bee iis sai ; woo'sdsn" MMM BI"
at a ONINDVEL YO dNASId HOS

(ae ere
| pneoesuretmg ene9 anth ||
HSIN |

siskpuny notes urd meg gest
oubisay 238

tj -———__ ——— Vow Lannie rerio)

PECTS

yt T 0, 34a
evn dudalen svogiaewo nen] — QE

on nae srANE Raa Tea Te wane C emu
s2-on ay faa OES bh Feed ed
Kaci OPE te QA me fveu
: Set RabmppEe eg] NY MeNeEED Way EOE co aa pao ou
aay Seton 16 ares iH LINCO AG LNEMAWA $ $ u Peyloaoy Su,

Panieaey 980,

| _sayecvensa | aso9 |Aumnng owls pompous t ie Saal
Fy nN g avo

neg wracey wining | Aisai3a yo 2a panos

pb | SSO)

(XING 3SN SOIAN3S TWLSOd) NISTYO.

4 t anaes ardoroug |” aun aon cing
wth ee]
of Lied wual

(XING 250 1¥
BOSSOIPPYOLANIOISOg — "was TusossauvusaaLiNA

| swore “e800
; [9qe7] OumeWY SSIudSXA a

JDIAUIZS TVLSOd SALVLS GALINN

_TIVIN
SSAUdXA

"'SHId@O § ONDIVW SU NOA ‘OsVH SSAHd



Prepared by Kansas City Plant
| Bendix Small Reactor Development

ATOMIC BOWEN DEVELOPMENT 105

pends. and, in Taet, aceishons lieve caused enn sof bite and
prep However, wo still ge orl sbles reasonably chose
to popu wel areas aad witininera lt armanenitiens dLanips wena aun Taree
that ate y hazavids be

other inde: AES ‘ith dle, re-
i ahility and knowledge te
uiremenrs

citles. We wold like to enter thie
weated in the same: mau
pnt to

vrabla exper ‘y
handle them under certain ‘reralatory ve
vur opinion that the aut
rstructively. ‘TL
giviny strong beeative 10
this syeben is as great for dertilect inpeeyernenis
Tasie tuvenQen. oo That individuals uel UpRtnies
pratiote teelaialy, provress within Choi we
r inne icles tbeayrebail ‘.
wilting ¥

cv should alsa bo
corded in
jon aides
for Livadd
precebivsutee| Th
lds al ie the

ho the berders of iaveation wh

2. Tort pastels oof ear basen
which are averssory oF
grime device conte bot firice
aspetient whch, Semgehe
yphy Cocieaniiy other prirpeos

be do with Chea
rupanent device
Vieay wit hecater. thee spot
created for oi

Th
euph at
Invades hy

ivitue he
dad Lhe scope uf
e been kbows

pub ivety ss
ion pen pte
atyyeliod tend

styy der whielee
Je Sales. proctveaieut,
Live palien

tes

cune Ur ali Hapartand ives
tlen it only : . me SOW
Tiere aay in of thet 1 Nae
rieh [aICe svslent de vee Che Crelbvss eo Stemi vetesisty
with the tational =

feee soho
eutve, cant
Wry procapeaient
eet hie ireeliy ialstaal

\ siuiter - Beperrtne
ilerest,

The pre

‘five patent a
Ut Cae
Mion ot bah G
Destity be the Qedadiis @& incentt

ia tal shy
spanent which pant ’
Tite atbnt any athe AD eteyedeaparieny
Leue Uhat rwith | saree comelel cine
leony wl detnonsi tare ai opmracige dleviee,
auuples wee are dhe Wright brothees, Tene
Alesuider Grahans Rell. Eitison
whe bay
to pradkien :

Perhaps ints tefieativ
We atamiy ase 1
pu sisitele for tho
Kei aun ory be ye

sit

apunient et a
onset bey thie

Page abd 7

Prepared by rage 7
http://ia700508.us. archive, org/BookReader/BookRKeaderlmages.php/zip=/6/.... 2/22/2013



US Department of Labor
DEEOICP-Leiton

Frances Perkins Building
200 Constitution Ave. N.W.
Washington D:C. 20210

AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRESENTATION

Fite Number (SS#). WORKER. 2
1, : (CLAIMANT) who resides at

, do hereby authorize Wayne Knox at 3808 Foxford Dr., Atlanta GA, 30340 to serve as my
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE in all matters pertaining to the adjudication of my claim under the
Energy Employees' Occupational illness Compensation Act, (EEOICPA).

| understand the following applies statute applies to both Part B and Part E payments

§ 7385q. Attorney fees .
(a) GENERAL RULE—Notwithstanding any contract, the representative of an individual may not
receive, for services rendered in connection with the claim of an individual for payment of lump-sum
compensation under part B of this subchapter, more than that percentage specified in subsection (b)
of a payment made under part B of this subchapter on such claim.
(b) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE LIMITATIONS—The percentage referred to in subsection (a) is—
(1) 2 percent for the filing of an initial claim for payment of lump-sum compensation; and
(2) 10 percent with respect to objections to a recommended decision denying payment of
lump-sum compensation.
{c) INAPPLICABLILITY TO OTHER SERVICES—This section shall not apply with respect to
services rendered that are not in connection with such a claim for payment of lump-sum
compensation.

CLAIMANT Signature, Date



1.412.3.3, Ensure that this program minimizes the administrative burden on workers and
their survivors, and respects their dignity and privacy.
1.2. |was exposed to many types of radioactive materials, chemicals and biological agents
without my “knowledge and consent”, as acknowledge by the US Congress in the Energy
Employees Occupational Iliness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA) cited as 42 USC
§7384 et seq and Executive Order 17195 .
My primary objective in completing this affidavit is to obtain fair medical treatment and
compensation for me and co-worker illnesses under the provisions of the Act and Executive
Order.
. My name
. Lam ald a
. I live at
. | was employed by the General Services Administration (GSA) and stationed at the Banister
Facility located at, ww,
. | worked at the facility from
, In accordance with the followin:
42 USC §7384 et seq.
1.10. The following citations refer to sections of 42 USC §7384 et seq

1.3.

soss
NOnd

wo

1
1

Performance of Duty
2.1.

2.2.

2.3.

Exposures

l understand the following statutory, regulatory and guidance requirements apply:

a. 20 CFR § 30.231 (b) states: “Proof of exposure to a toxic substance may be established by the
submission of any appropriate document or information that is evidence that such substance was
present at the facility in which the employee was employed and that the employee came into contact
with such substance. OWCP site exposure matrices may be used to provide probative factual evidence
that a particular substance was present at either a DOE facility........”

b. 20 CFR § 30.111 (@) states: “A claimant will not be entitled to any presumption otherwise provided for
in these regulations if substantial evidence exists that rebuts the existence of the fact that is the subject
of the presumption. Substantial evidence means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might
accept as adequate to support a conclusion. When suck evidence exists, the claimant shall be notified
and afforded the opportunity to submit additional written medical documentation or records.”



Special Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

under the Energy Employees Occupational Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
llness Compensation Act National Institute for Occupational Safety and Heath
OMB Number: 0920-0639 Expires: 09/20/2013

Special Exposure Cohort Petition — Page z of 7

Survivor Information — Complete Section B if you are a Survivor or representing a Survivor.

B.t Name of Survivor:

Mrs./Ms. First Name Middle initial Last Name
8.2 Social Security Number of Survivor:

8.3 Address of Survivor:

Street Apt # P.O, Box

City State Zip Code
B.4 Telephone Nurnber of Survivor: = ¢ 1

B.5 Email Address of Survivor:

5.6 Relationship to Employee: Q Spouse QO Son/Daughter Q Parent
Q Grandparent Q Grandchild
Go to Part C.
¢ Employee Information — Complete Section C UNLESS you are a labor organization.

C.2 Former Name of Employee (e.g., maiden nameflegal name change/other):

Mr./Mrs.fMs. First Name Middle Initial Last Name
C3 Social Security Number of Employee: ———
C4 A lovee (if livin

C5 Telephone Number of Employee: ,.i(‘tewlllUlUrr
C.6 Email Address of Employee: _ ES

C.7 Employment Information Related to Petition:
C.7a Employee Number {if known):

C.7b Dates of Employment: Start ECA RINE End
C.7¢ Employer Name: Kansas City TLANT (KG P)

ui { ==
C.7d Work Site Location pnw stew F TRS
C.7e Supervisor's Name: i

Go to Part E.

Name or Social Security Number of First Petitioner: Eni



: Kansas City Plant
Bendix Small Reactor Development Page 1 pifgke 5

ATOMIC TOWEE DEVELOPALENTS 3

competitive with e ain cverda ppg a
exch hag found a part jn our Unlustatstl system,
only afler extensive experiment, trial and error
tation, and free selection.

‘Yo confine the development

wal
rived at
venient, adiep-

C pawer a inits of LOOG6G

lilowatts or larger wonld prejudge a pote whess heforp most
ot U is Juul beew «let th Phere is free yon Lendeney

in undertaking a new ent: 240 shiowt
Fav yroals Hick are doo high. power
prog

ne wher
leas]
installations.

Tn ote opeision there shoul lw
of 10,000 kilowirts, 100,000 [iow
af 10 kihewnets iy over Chat bath tech yi
shatl he neck over the whole + t
senna more, (as net ualikely ey smnitl ber}

y he very natiire ef cb

inf our experion
etalk advan, 1a

fegey and) fretendene

saloy ents ct guasvers

why

infort

inay very well provide usefal galot plier information Le
urare edfeeciy dovelopnient ef the Donate 5 cycle nite,

Jt is well fe Lear inoinind thet there is minehy eneine
power werd fron sinall units in this comutey as is generated liy the

of the tility

chen TON
No lary ns Wea ptons
oy power lave vot emerged to fovur ce l fields poo
Sreanising commercial areas, Oho sbnedies ine these i
have lud to the sane « asians reached

othe atey Hop zt,

<1 Puawe
ted co the pair where
pealituldy nuislertad
Pairs ine sy mew are nek i
rernuient and delusrey abiiest
talons far thee ¥

ne Litt the

1h

Choy studies of isereye and ry
the neul for a reactor harkg al

pose au
POT U
f:

« potepculitins indie
nil

Tench yaroa
Liy dhe simetinies jill

vient tase ut b

a neler Fr

Ted COREE
ve tole

mye Lively
swat ine Ae

ry sits
vahuable

The patirr
a duody bial gens

iton of thon
Ho Mivisery ©
L _Gaverinms nv basta
arab pevsettiel whiek

Wuittties 1s
basic ds

Prepared > a
hittp://ia700508.us.archive. org/BookReader/BookReaderimages php?zip=/6/... Pee P°



AFFIDAVIT OF NUCLEAR WORKER

STATE OF Missouri
COUNTY OF Jackson

PERSONALLY came and appeared before me, the undersigned Notary, the within

named

and makes this his statement and Affidavit upon oath and affirmation of belief and
personal knowledge that the following matters, facts and things set forth are true and
correct to the best of his knowledge.

Plant worked from



Industriai X-ray Gauging devices, EE veutron Generators,

Neutron Plutonium-Beryllium Sources, Accelerators, Cesium Irradiator, Medical X-
ray and Electro Curtain.

3.3.1.3. | did not wear a radiation dosimeter or provide a bioassay sample.

3.3.1.4. _ | was informed and the facility was labeled as a “nonnuctear’ facility. | believe
the facility classification was knowingly misrepresented.

3.3.2, Creosote containing many different toxic substances

3.3.2.1 Based on my experience and observation, the floor was made of wooden
blocks and was in a continuous state of repair and maintenance: Being coated with
a wood preservative.

3.3.2.2. 1 smelled the irritating fumes originating from the floor and now understand that
the floor was treated with a wood preservative called creosote.

3.3.2.3. | The primary chemicals of concem within creosote are polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), phenois, and creosols. These materials would increase the
risk and incidence of pancreatic cancer, respiratory disorders along with other
illnesses,

3.3.2.4. | understand these creosote wooden blocks were removed in about __ and
buried onsite,

3.3.3.
3

3.3.3.2. b understand the SEM and other document indicate to releases of many

materials during
3.3.3.3. | was not made aware of the presence of these toxic substance or provided
respiratory protection.

3.3.4.
3.3.4.1
3.3.4.2.
3.3.4.3.
3.3.4.4. Some of these vents were located near the air intake and as such the released

toxic substances coulkd reenter the facility.

3.3.5. Beryllium
3.3.5.1. To the best of my knowledge, | did not work directly with Beryllium; however,

3.3.6. Asbestos
3.3.6.1. To the best of my knowledge, § did not work directly with Asbestos; however,
es

3.3.7. Diesel and Gasoline Engine Exhaust
3.3.7.1. To the best of my knowtedge, | did not work directly with Diese! and Gasoline

Engine Exhaust; howe galas

3.3.8. Unrecorded, Unmeasured and Immeasurable Radiological, Chemical and
Biological Exposures
3.3.8.1.


DRAFT 1
AFFIDAVIT OF NUCLEAR WORKER

STATE OF. 5 {
COUNTY OF baci sSoas

PERSONALLY came and appeared before me, the undersigned Notary, the within
127re RT: is 2 resident of
he eno nt County, State of_MiseyoQ2@1 _. and

makes this his/her statement and Affidavit upon oath and affirmation of belief and personal knowledge
that the following matters, facts and things set forth are true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge

1. Introduction

1.1. | am filing this affidavit based on 20 CFR 30.111 (c) which states:
"Written affidavits or declarations, subject to penalty for perjury, by the employee, swrvivor or any
other person, .....may be relied on in determining whether a claim meets the requirements of the Act for
benefits if, and only if, such person attests that due diligence was used to obtain records in support of
the claim, but that no records exist”.
4.1.1. The records do not exist or misrepresent worker exposure and as established by:
4.1.1.1. Findings the US Congress:
WAAL § 7384 (a) (2) workers were “put at risk without their knowledge and consent
for reasons that, documents reveal, were driven by fears of adverse publicity, liability,
and employee demands for hazardous duty pay”.
1.1.1.1.2. § 7384 (a) (3) “Many previously secret records have documented
unmoniiored exposures to radiation and beryllium and continuing problems at these
sites across the Nation”

LiL. § 7384 (a) (5) “...scientific findings have emerged that indicate that certain of
such employees are experiencing increased risks of dying from cancer and non-
malignant diseases.”

1.1.1.1.4. § 7384 (a) (6) ".....scientific evidence supports the conclusion that
occupational exposure to dust particles or vapor of beryllium can cause beryllium
sensitivity and chronic beryllium disease.”
LLLLS. § 7384 (a) (6) ° ...98 percent of radiation-induced cancers ....... occurred at
dose levels below existing maximum safe thresholds.
1.1.1.2. Presidential Document —Executive Order 13179 states

1.1.1.2.1. “Too often, these workers were neither adequately protected from, nor informed
of, the occupational hazards to which they were exposed’.
LLL22, No State workers’ compensation benefits provided “....because of long

latency periods, the uniqueness of the hazards to which they were exposed, and
inadequate exposure data, long latency periods, the uniqueness of the hazards to
which they were exposed,
4.1.1.2.3. “Federal Government” should:
1.11.2.3.1. “Provide necessary information and otherwise help employees of the DOE or
its contractors determing if their ilinesses are associated with conditions of their
nuclear weapons-related work
1.1.1.2.3.2, Provide workers and their survivors with all pertinent and available
information necessary for evaluating and processing claims;


Prepared b' Kansas City Plant
a Bendix Smali Reactor Development Page 6

at ATOMS POWER OEY ELOPRENT

deenensih advan
y direct, their ©
military protdems.

The Frog How cf bitsie tifeamation Fr
avalnable foundat
eotiatey

eto! the aviation art but whiel ite
ods particularly to the salution of

nthe NACA has provided
fie presenl aviation strneture ef Uo
It is noteworthy that NACA
Teed that industry with military
Gans accomplishes the engi-
the engines nd the compenents
A cemperative
fo its fullest hie been developed
niie energy ny wt be so simply
hefure. its.
Head nist be broken
trey Jeena ey
: the tirst binie a
ecuie into being
iy pattern whereby
w techtiologies for (he

fre verity
ant while

in wakes t palig!
fiehd Go private: cong
h

Hive enterpy ys
{ tpen a new techie .
ly,
piotweréd Use use of 1
oobi people is nee Cally
tavalyend prin
smut ps
jovernment dit uat have an

jadenient i appr
whieh the
where ones

thse bo he Cake inden
fle have, lowes tel proce lett
issiles fo point to as 1 ‘yoenn shoulder,
ins the competitive market, more and more of dae responsibility for
developing atch new industrial lines, while preserving the Govern-
ments inte in their wililery
fe fool that the attitudes iowa
Sache Jight of the eppartunit
ar akevelripnrents for the Nations.
tion Corps pedivw and t
ii H rtmsents For

rihur, and guided

vider TInderstinding. af
"ey. in the Bendix Avia-
carity areas in
ars. We speak
Ho seeurily.

Othe seeurity oP
rfere should le al
pons iinet OiTicay pawe
resilical ioe for ot bier pratte
y by pr
have unar
siting
remo

neh lower er ne security: ‘|
aie the paliey of

1 vfs
y prohibition We believe hat w
iene el new ideas by Che jiedicta
H Lnowe would lise fiany enetiy
plete exehisinns new iat being.

We forthos hetieve that <ueh a phin of
vely auch olficicntly applied by industey
srwrriat pslises,
re snre tit athe
yobs exerting a reta

ssonither (hans security

part

lelition to rigid seenvity, whieh

At with effectively, Srrety Measures

Sesauple, we favor satety measnces Lo pratevt fife and property,

xg but it is well te hear i Tene tint potentint przards ano precen€ in a.
Sou THT RLY OF ITIV TRE Seay MmheT Ties experionre pte: omidal haz-

cow evem in
—_——_

——

http://ia700508.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderlmages.php?zip=/6/ 2/22/2013

Prepared by i Page 6



Affidavit


Special Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

under the Energy Employees Occupational Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
lliness Compensation Act National institute for Occupational Safety and Health

7 OMB Number: 0920-0633 Expires: 09/20/2013
Special Exposure Cohort Petition — Form B Page 7 of7

Public Burden Statement

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response,
including time for reviewing instructions, gathering the information needed, and completing the form. If you
have any comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this burden, send them to CDC Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton
Road, MS-E-11, Atlanta GA, 30333; ATTN:PRA 0920-0639. Do not send the completed petition form to this
address. Completed petitions are te be submitted to NIOSH at the address provided in these instructions.
Persons are not required to respond to the information collected on this form unless it displays a currently
valid OMB number.

Privacy Act Advisement

In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. § 552a), you are hereby notified of the
following:

The Energy Employees Occupational Iliness Compensation Program Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 7384-7385}
({EEOICPA) authorizes the President to designate additional classes of employees to be included in the
Special Exposure Cohort (SEC). EECICPA authorizes HHS to implement its responsibilities with the
assistance of the National Institute for Occupational Safety (NIOSH), an Institute of the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention. Information obtained by NIOSH in connection with petitions for including additional
classes of employees in the SEC will be used to evaluate the petition and report findings to the Advisory
Board on Radiation and Worker Health ang HHS.

Records containing identifiable information become part of an existing NIOSH system of records under the
Privacy Act, 09-20-147 "Occupational Heaith Epidemiological Studies and EECICPA Program Records,
HHS/COC/NIOSH.” These records are treated in a confidential manner, unless otherwise compelled by taw.
Disclosures that NIOSH may need to make for the processing of your petition or other purposes are fisted
below.

NIOSH may need to disclose personal identifying information to: (a) the Department of Energy, other federal
agencies, other government or private entities and to private sector employers to permit these entities to
retrieve records required by NIOSH; (b) identified witnesses as designated by NIOSH so that these
individuals can provide information to assist with the evaluation of SEC petitions; (¢) contractors assisting
NIOSH; {d) collaborating researchers, under certain limited circumstances to conduct further investigations:
(e) Federal, state and local agencies for taw enforcement purposes; and (f} a Member of Congress or a
Congressional staff member in response to a verified inquiry.

This notice applies to ali forms and informational requests that you may receive from NIOSH in connection
with the evatuation of an SEC petition.

Use of the NIOSH petition forms (A and B) is voluntary but your provision of information required by these

forms is mandatory for the consideration of a petition, as specified under 42 CFR Part 83. Petitions that fail to
provide required information may not be considered by HHS.

Name or Social Security Number of First Petitioner: lel



AYO POWEG DEVELOPMENT

Kansas City Plant
Bendix Small Reactor Development

AOL

the vonanittes is heldinge its deliberations 44 intpurd ie ith
the developnient of ataue wre Tar we biefieve Chat the Hime is ip
for a review of the progress we have dade amd a dolereinaiion of
Tew Fost de extend oor raul ceful fivlls. Some
ofthe ev ators sel Lying th Ba

One. rt
the production af power i
nieve cee] venngy!
are fore

Two, the “Leeliniea! sou
fits. been, eon ieee
Iso he pprimtey et
Me give,
T hives the pr
Lehn as ides

earth

Hie unsintens
depends npan the
ihe sucess
rence,

pis Fina

probably
probably cannet be rede
PE reactor power corres x

The first three rs
testiagony. We she
As to {4} any he
jnthix of new people and t
edue. ‘Chis we new lind
Weapons progyia

of progeess in pu vee fal apie

shr

Fall techs degeic
of industry.

Wik :
iy the work of Uae Mar
siptt is extremely 1
ment of he sient
experioner, as Chey
toh

Reueding reason (6) 4
Inost in pertanr, Hie eon
pore fron tbriee who av
needlest Ser the
iyi. Site
comstractinn suid de:
reactor, Lt uiay he as
whorg mutch ve:

Many af the 1
ta the paint where the a

tioual poticy fur power development. lists best

Frege
http://ia700508.us.arc'

vering problems, sarl

vefbivusst iene oF thas Cian:
14) steonlst ese

Faeetex of dhe ate

he more extended apipbc

ters For
rile Fev lays
elummen ferciny ewe fila,

se availabe

inl
Liby tl
ered

of the dis
Commi

yy sutures af

peeeCorisrl Lircsctit
power te

vtralie

eeersteliel dor in Mss Pala naeloae pang
hess af on divi «

tes Ge aeadiatsier or existeiag Le

eonaedear techy
noni ation af the mucker arts.
Ties heretofare uendlertakes os

instusty

yeqored to putt commercial power reactor
chord ‘tor antheriaation. ‘This time
al by new auveries. heave delays nese will
ond ingly farther jute (as tatare,

have been amply covered in the pri
ely only an the beet dir
y vegnires The steady

Dt bemdening of uses for its keow)

aledicwuery field, Thr. >
ail rapielly imaprowd
finns adler present. kiwi pod
ure to dnlprest. new people ane find new
frmu present progratis
Whar ain be tl

us

ie cans

rest

ne gee tof stant i
uin Distriet aud Atmoie Energy €
is shoul give ve emfidence in the judg.
ebnieal peaple. within the seope af thew
Trial use, cowl sie

48 1h
sus OF melee engine
Vanite strteess ful reer that tie dine
tinal thernenly brolics, detail
eeelitectiea) desist,
fer EiberaeD Dest ces
fast neutiin reactor

ith especial eup-

wich ag LIS veues Fo
crusting Co bey dun.

mas ubeve have been dtadtied wind rvsticdivd
xk styps can be Gaken only after a lira
peehomteed by Congress:

ve,org/BookReader/BookReaderimages. pup /zip-7o/

Page | Pag 3

2/2 2FAR >



Hees

ANNIST

eight samples taken inside ©
¢ build
Last month, in a press con-

Ih Federal officials previously
ad said the wall between the _.
offices and manufacturing
‘areas was scaled. .

; Siwell;ang they fear that GSA of-
“Hives may-have been: contami-

ated. Many office workers for
GSA..and. other government :
geticics have become sick aud
‘died, workers say... ae
Last year, GSA and the Envi:
-Mobmental Protection Agericy’
Tagreed to a'work plan to try to

i detect possible contaminants:

Fe In November, 31 air and dust
ySaniples were taken as part of a
iStteening study by a-consult-
‘Mot to. determine if there yas
‘Beryllium contamination. Air
‘Simples didnot detect: any
‘Rarmaful levels.

‘Two of the dist samnpies had
tectable: Jevels of beryilitim,
- But Ge’ of those was onthe
dooL Of the eight samples in--
‘Side the building, one detected *
» Beryllium... =
"Officials said the levels were .
~ compatable to those found-in
dirt, and were not high enough
oo, be considered a health haz-

However, the federal govérn-
ment has-varying standards for
determining “hazardous levels
of surface furh, and some -
scientists now'say any détecta -
ble levels can be-dangerous to
\bumar health: “ a

“Thete is a term for this ~

stoke aid ynirrors,” said Mar-- y
“cus Iszard, associate professor
of pharmacology/toxicology at
the University of Missouri-
Kansas City. “You have the gnv-

But current and former GSA’ |

ER

7 PROM THE COVER |THE KANSAS CITY?

estions linger after tests

town hait méeting

Géxeral Services Administration ré
chemical testing done

gional adiiinistrator, spoke Monday. ata
he Bannister Federal Complex, :

PHOTOS BY SUL TOYOSHIBA | THE KANSAS CITY ST,

erment hiditig behind incon-

sistent levels of exposure. The
wy 0 Only., thing’. T
@ors can gw by a
KansasCity.com ‘Us point. is
fora photo." the best ex-
gallery, “posure fs ao
gave. exposure,”
Joseph, ' Alford, “who bas.

worked at the plant for inore:
than” 30° years, told ‘officials
Monday. that he. was con. * |: .
cettiéd about ‘where -the- con. +
taminated beryllium. sample
Nas found: — aekt toa. wall :
separates GSA, from Hon--"

%

“My coticérn is, that is tight.
ext. door ‘to oir neighbor * "
where beryilium might ‘come!’
from,". Alford said “You can
see lights on (ander doorways)
from our. a¢ighbors, We're ‘bh
connected a lot mote’ than we
Tealize.” ms

Officials said that as part:of |

thelr study they tried to deter. . yilium
mine whether the ‘beryllium’
found in the offices: might be TM:
naturally occurring, but: they
had no conclusive ‘evidence of ,
tin fecam

+ CESS

‘pathways of beryllium from:
Honeywell into GSA offices.
_ Officials also had to explain

get it ri

““We-svant' to make sure
i”, Brees Said. "AL’.
ctigh the Process Is ékten-
sive, if we received prelininary.

Déimira uartes of Kansas City, wha Worked at the federal
complex On Bannistor Road, was upset by the length of
ime It took for test results to-be reported. ”

Why. the results, which ‘had
ee rumored for.- months,
took so long to release,
". _ Representatives of to labo-
ratortes said Monday that ber-
fum ‘samples. can be -pro-
‘ anywhere. fom ae
lays tO two weeks depending.
on Avhether the. customer
“wants the results rushed. ; _’

data that indicated. healt)
concern, we would immedi
ately consult with EPA ... 7 «
inform tenants, and emyscy
ees.” ‘ aa
Quarles told officials that tor
many of her ‘co-workers aré
sick ot have died. and govern.
ment neéded to be- more ‘re

sponsive. 3 toa
: “A letof people I knew when

~: Angela Brées, 2 GSA.spikes-
“woman, said officials wanted “Iwas young bere have ed
to triple-chiéck the iésults.

away,” Quarles said. “It’s a very
sad situation.” we TS
To react Karen Dilton, cal!"
816-234-4430 or send email to

kdillon@kestarcom, °


Special Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

under the Energy Employees Occupational Centers for Disease Cantrol and Prevention
Iiness Compensation Act National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
OMB Number: 0920-0639 Expires: 09/20/2013

Special Exposure Cohort Petition — Form B

Page 4 of 7

Proposed Definition of Employee Class Covered by Petition — Complete Section E.
E.1 Name of DOE or AWE Facility:

E2 Locations at the Facility relevant to this petition:
aoe EL Boauaisver Rol Kaysos ty Mo

E3 List job titles and/or job duties of employees included in the class. In addition, you can list by
name any individuals other than petitioners identified on this form whe you believe should be
included in this class: ,

Mrecwinigt Hepa eutice/ ALL Crass FicaTioUS
iy

E4 Employment Dates relevant to this petition:

Start 19oS End Zofo
Start End
Start End

E.5 Is the petition based on one or more unmonitored, unrecorded, or inadequately monitored or
recorded exposure incidents?: [Ves OQ No

if yes, provide the date(s) of the incident(s) and a complete description (attach additional pages

Go to Part F.

Name cr Social Security Number of First Petitioner: hh



Special Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

under the Energy Employees Occupational . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
liness Compensation Act Nationat Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

. OMB Number: 0920-0639 Expires: 09/20/2013
Special Exposure Cohort Petition — Form B Page 3087

Labor Orga in Information — Complete Section 0 ONLY if you are a labor organizati

Dui Labor Organization Information:

Name of Organization

Position of Contact Person
D.2 = Name of Petition Representative:

D.3 Address of Petition Representative:

Street Apt # P.Q. Box

City State Zip Code
D4 Telephone Number of Petition Representative: )

DS Email Address of Petition Representative:

D.6 Period during which labor organization represented employees covered by this petition
(please attach documentation): Start End

D.7 Identity of other labor organizations that may represent or have represented this class of
employees (if known):

Go to Part E.

Name or Social Security Number of First Petitioner:



AFFIDAVIT OF
NUCLEAR WORKER

STATE OF MISSOURI
COUNTY OF JACKSON

REQUEST FOR: Special Exposure Cohort (SEC), assigned to The Kansas City Plant (KCP)
Personally came and appeared before me, the undersigned Notary, the within nam:
a ... is a resident 0 = makes this
statement and Affidavit upon oath and affirmation of belief and personal knowledge that the following
matters, facts and things set forth are true and correct to the best offknowledge.
T submit this request, based on the neglect of the monitoring of the workers at the Kansas City Plant,

covering the years ¢ Class employees list to be covered is stated below, with common
reasoning for justification for inclusion.

REASON FOR INCLUSION
These employees were subject to regular exposures of their daily operating functions. These exposures
were not tonitored, and not known to the employees. Activities of remediation of all types of hazardous
elements were taking place while these employees performed their duties.

Inever was I cautioned or aware of any hazard, or potential hazard.

Never was I monitored to my knowledge, or wore a cusimeter badge.

It must be noted here the Nuclear Weapons industry was in the “Build Up Mode” in weapons production. The KCP, was
in the process of growing the population of the plant from 2000approx, to 9000 pius employees. Placement of

NOTARY PUBLIC - - State of Kansas
ee Spode sang

State Of Kaname

County Of Johnson
Subscribed and sworn before me this
(day of Amey 2.

Notary Pubs


Specia} Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

under the Energy Employees Occupational Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
liness Compensation Act National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

7" OMB Number; 0920-0639 Expires: 09/20/2013
Special Exposure Cohort Petition — Form B Page 6 of7

F.3 © IWe have attached a report from a health physicist or other individual with expertise in
radiation dose recanstruction documenting the limitations of existing DOE or AWE records on
radiation exposures at the facility, as relevant to the petition. The report specifies the basis for
believing these documented limitations might prevent the completion of dose reconstructions for
members of the class under 42 CFR Part 82 and related NIOSH technical implementation
guidelines.

(Attach report to the back of the petition form.)

F4 0 1We have attached a scientific or technical report, issued by a government agency of the
Executive Branch of Government or the General Accounting Office, the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, or the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, or published in a peer-reviewed
journal, that identifies dosimetry and related information that are unavailable (due to either a lack
of monitoring or the destruction or Joss of records} for estimating the radiation doses of
employees covered by the petition.

(Attach report to the back of the petition form.)
Go to Part G.

G Signature of Person(s) Submitting this Petition — Complete Section G.

All Petiti petition. A maximum of three persons may sign the petition.

Date

Notice: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, misrepresentation, concealment of
fact or any other act of fraud to obtain compensation as provided under EEOICPA or who
knowingly accepts compensation to which that person is not entitled is subject to civil or
administrative remedies as well as felony criminal prosecution and may, under appropriate
criminal provisions, be punished by a fine or imprisonment or both. | affirm that the information
provided on this form is accurate and true.

Send this form to: SEC Petition
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
NIOSH
4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C-47
Cincinnati, OH 45226
SS ——
{f there are additional petitioners, they must complete the Appendix Forms for additional petitioners.
The Appendix forms are located at the end of this document.

Name or Social Security Number of First Petitioner: ac =


c. For Part E, § 7385-4. Determinations regarding contraction of covered illnesses (c) (1) ....a
shail be determined [ Part E] to have contracted a
covered illness through exposure at a Department of Energy facility if—

(A) it is at least as likely as not that exposure to a toxic substance at a Department of
Energy facility was a significant factor in aggravating, contributing to, or causing the
illness; and
(B) it is at least as likely as not that the exposure to such toxic substance was related to
employment at a Department of Energy facility.

t understand the phase “a /east as likely as not” means the exposure was “more than mere
suspicion or hunch”. This based on the “Guidance for District Medical Consultants”, Section 2.
“Legal Standards of Certainty and Concepts”. The guidance indicates the “at least as likely as not”
causation standard for Part E “to fall between” the upper level of “Low - reasonable suspicion (For
probable cause and reasonable suspicion cite La Fave, et al, Criminal Procedure, sec 3.3 and 3.9 (4th
ed West 2004)}" and the “Lowest of mere suspicion (hunch)”.

Additionally with regard to "4¢ Least as Likely as Not”, “Chapter 2-0700 Establishing Toxic
Substance Exposure” § (2) states: “Part E only requires proof that established exposure “at least as
likely as not" was a significant factor in aggravating, contributing to or causing the employee's illness,
disease or death. As with Part B, “at least as likely as not” means 50% or greater likelihood.

Both phrases, “more likely than not” and “at least as likely as not”, as related to Part B mean “50%
or greater likelikeod”

The phase “a significant factor’ means “any factor” as confirmed by Federal Register / Vol,
71, No. 250 / Friday, December 29, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 78523. The Federal
Register states: “Because it is impossible to determine the extent to which any individual factor
contributed to the development of cancer, QWCP has concluded that the only way to comply with the
statutory mandate in Part E is, in effect, to interpret ‘a significant factor’’ as including “any factor.”

3.1. | fully support the Congressional findings in the 42 USC §7384 ef seq that t and fellow GSA
co-workers listed in Appendix A were exposed to toxic chemicals, radioactive materials,
radiation and biological agents “without knowledge and consent’ or even proper training and
protection.

3.2. Documented and Accepted Exposure
20 CFR § 30.231 (b) states: “OWCP site exposure matrices[SEM] may be used to provide probative

factual evidence that a particular substance was present at either a DOE facility... ....”

Chapter 2-0700 Establishing Toxic Substance Exposure §8 (d) states: “All information in SEM
is considered valid and factual, The toxic substance, work process, and facility information in SEM is
deemed verified by DUE or other sources, and if a certain toxic substance is listed as present in a given
building or facility, the data is accepted as fact and no additional confirmation from DOE or any other
source is necessary.”

3.2.1. Work performed at KCP, a “Department of Energy facility” (§ 73841, (10)), would fall
under the following Department of Labor KCP Site Exposure Matrix (SEM)
3.2.1.1. Labor categories and associated exposures:
3.2.4.1.1.
3.2.1.1.2.
3.2.1.1.3.



PRE RI

‘QHART PETITION
BRC

KANSAS CITY BANNISTER COMPLEX

By,
3
Completed and signed SEC Petition Form
AFFIDAVIT TABLE OF CONTENTS of PETITIONS
Name: Page Numbers:
Pg. 1
HE 4 fficavit Pg. 2-3
00: of Status........ Pg. 4
HE (ove! Sheer... ws PB 5S
HR s'fcavir.. Pg. 6-7
(ove: Sheet... Pg. 8
a +32. Pg. 9
a
HE + 02.5) . 11-20

Kansas City Star, News Article...

Misc. Support Document.

- 22-32


, February 28, 2013

SEC Petition

National \nstitute of Occupational Safety and Health
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, MS-C47
4676 Columbia Parkway

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

RE: SEC Petition for the Kansas City Plant
To Whom It May Concern,

On behalf of the following class of employees | wish to submit a request for Special
Exposure Cohort under 42 CFR Part 83 of the EEIOCPA (ACT).

| contend. based on my assessment of available information, and as

that worker radiation doses at the "Kansas City Plant", as defined by the ACT,
cannot be performed with sufficient accuracy as required due to, among others:
e Lack of qualified health physicist professionals
« Inadequate radiation detection and monitoring equipment
« Inadequate application of radiological surveillance techniques and procedures and
» Secrecy of operations.

| further contend that the following classes of employers, from the best of my knowledge,
were not monitored for radiation exposure.

Managers and administrators, roof-top workers, day-laborers, contractors,
miscellaneous repairers, construction workers, and equipment operators,
engineers, tool makers, repair technicians, health technicians. technologist,
maintenance worker, electricians, mechanics, pipe fitters, sub-contractors, security
personnei, sheet metal workers (operators), plant/System/utility operators, machine
set-up operators, welders/solders, precision production workers, drivers, material
handlers, machinist, laborers, helpers, nurses, and miscellaneous employees.

According to the Site profile far the Kansas City Plant (document ORAUT-TKBS-0031)
provided by the ORAU Team, Dade Moeller & Associates, and the MJW Corporation report
dated 05/31/2005 section 5.14.3 (pg. 20), “Due to the nature of the work performed at KCP,
and because no accident were found, it is reasonable to assume that intakes of DU from
1953 to 1971 were chronic unless the individuals dosimetry records indicate othenvise.”
However, the following paragraph states, “The results of individual measurements were



(Authorized Representative and Health Physicist)

Affidavit


Prepared b’ Kansas City Plant
—, | Bendix Small Reactor Development Page 2

ACH ATOSUE POWEID DEVELOPMENT.

ing the [urther development. of atomic energy for peacetime purposes,

‘Because our cor} poration is fundamentiliy an equipment maker in
tha nutometi nircruft, and communications industries, it has
acquibed considerable experience in the planning and operations ne
essary to bring wong the new products and proces Ainong onr
portant pr ochiet Lines ate in: und eontrols of all kinds, and.
we know that te properly mieasie, coutrol, and muvigate, it is neces-
rt-haind knowludge of the primary func-
lions and prewe with which we are denlir

TIenee, ws atemic energy and its poser and other applications ap—

ave on the horizon, we hegan to direct aur efforts toward acquiring
powledge, organization, and whieh would justify our prar-
new liek), davetopedd i sina] uncon facts
im ovat al meringion. We
y departinent at our research tabara-
stuf of nuckar engineers, physicists,

shel
had for stine time a py
y where we have a brave,
and technicians.

Ww ve made, |

Laur awn expense, four stulies af power
m, lieve just complete a fifth -for.our
youl fo relegse fo the Camunisston a detii bet
var beiadape P nuurkels, We have nperated for the ABC
bane a faciléty at Kot: devoted ta the nea
runical deviews of various types, and

ure presently producing components
ted with the military atomic energy

and functional dev
ye ‘OTANI.
We ar
Your come
tur impor
( vor rere

of course, well aware of mun;

eo nod of the pot Janel
pt part af the disc
[ieweve

af the problems faced by

rity considerations which

mx aid the actions. We feat

borkt l nfined to these areas
where we lave frst-liand experi ntiou. We should Like
fo Lave por cennments ialerpreberk os applying genernty te the policies

~ anv]: merms-Correcetbiniag the development of mlomic energy for posco~
Ful purposes, inekiding power, chemistry ane rediation.

All of our relations with the A ve confirmed our belief that
tls actntvest bby high purpose, devotion
ta its respon epruipelenes.

We believe that dhe Atomie Enerey Commission and your commit
tee | y the conpar aricrive htorpwetation of the
pevsoné y Act undid at period of experience bad been oh.
tained. We believe, 10 (aint the echnulogy, and
miliéary ue camptete con:
centestion

We would ike ta shate fort
whiels ¥ ec come afer though ful: ce
thot jnvily

Fi. is one first.

eration of the factors

hasie eanelusion that with the experience in jiand
und with the weapons Progr: well advanced, the Hone has new como
fer y wore dibern| Duerpeetation of the present vet aud a stronger
suppor. Trtte field atthe peacelal ars

Oue of ch
pfien the
stroag supporl?  Shonid
emptoyed 2 Age the patent

hand develapment oper.
Does the progress warrant
be expanded? Should mare people be
Ie being itoveloped? We beliews that

http://ia700508.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderlmages. php?zip=/6/..._ 2/22/2013

Prepac) i = — Page 2


2 i Kansas City Plant
Bendix Small Reactor Development

ATOMIG POWER DEVELOPMENT AND PRIVATE
ENTERPRISE

MONDAY. | JULY; 20.) 1955

Cosounss of The Useren Srare:
doit Coster on Acresnne b>

Wersher
at 2p. phy pmrasesnt tar
tative W. Sterling

HV.

tan, 0. @.
sy) Ute rediny
Cole (rlniv

Ht iye mek

Cole Svuater Pastore, andl Represvntia-
fersost, Hol cand Pri

stl meuihers prose
or A. Hannitene

Live
F thes

jean vonmalil
Chairaicirn
“Vae first w
of ile Ber

will cot Lo or
Tiearnenn

repre:
1H; president,
le ant: Kunsas

eventiatl
Af pra

Lie agety lifer:
| eit.
of ony

ab cepentigay bs thee
bomy vangey

STATEMENTS OF MALCOM P. FERGUSON. PRESIDENT, AND L. A.

RYLAND. VICE PRESIDENT (ENGINEERING) .-BENDIX.8VIATION.

CORE.. DETROIT. MICH,

Mr Vhank you, Congeessiuan Coby 4 will proceed
witha .

vt very app weat che invitation: ex«

remted by yi Ty hefore the jousc saunter

Prepares

hitp:// 1a700508.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderlmages.php?zip=/6/ ve

Page |RAgP 1

Page 1
2/22/2013



Special Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

under the Energy Employees Occupational Centers for Disease Contra} and Prevention
Illness Compensation Act National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

OMB Number: 0920-0639 Expires: 09/20/2013
Special Exposure Cohort Petition — Form B Page 5of7

n are In

F Sasis for Proposing that Records and Inform quate for Individua! Dose —

Complete Section

Complete at least one of the following entries in this section by checking the appropriate box and providing
the required information related to the selection. You are not required to complete more than one entry.

Fi @ We have attached either documents or statements provided by affidavit that indicate that
radiation exposures and radiation doses potentially incurred by members of the proposed class,
that relate to this petition, were not monitored, either through personal monitoring or through area
monitoring.

(Attach documents and/or affidavits to the back of the petition form.)
Describe as completely as possible, to the extent it might be unclear, how the attached

docamentatgn and/or affidavit(s} indicate that ia] radiat) sures were not monitored
ee Represenative OV it

attache

F.2 O 1/Wehave attached either documents or statements provided by affidavit that indicate that
radiation monitoring records for members of the proposed class have been lost, falsified, or
destroyed; or that there is no information regarding monitoring, source, Source term, or process
from the site where the employees worked.

(Attach documents and/or affidavits to the back of the petition form.)

Describe as completely as possible, to the extent it might be unclear, how the attached
documentation and/or affidavit(s) indicate that radiation monitoring records for members of the
proposed class have been lost, altered illegally, or destroyed.

Part F is continued on the following page. |

Name or Social Security Number of First Petitioner:



(am a Unied States Of America Disabled Viet Nam Veteran, all my medical records and Healthcare are at the
United States of America Veterans Hospital.

My doctors at V.A. medical center informed me of my condition. My fiver specialist informed that | had
beryllium in mytiverand index finger right hand. My lung doctor informed me that | had_beryifium in my
lymph nodes

NOTARY PUBLIC

Cie De

AON SUPPES
Notary Public - Notary Seal
STATE OF MISSOURI
JACKSON COUNTY
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOV. 7, 2015
COMMISSION % 11384975



Prepared by:

ATOMIC POW

witht ented

tins Kuuwlertue grained shrosgly ths ex peantin

thas tine, €t

Areas, anagelit

diet fore lsc | bwena

such tt ihe raw taaleria
vf belpine unkerproviclel

. maf Have
fou thunk Vhst sac)
mt ty pr i
Peneaneur pulley of €
tu eover the int
wh 1 the insdust aD oitses uf

Hae

As gi indecte
fray beastly Cay dustry i
in all die plnses elit
ehh petashuet, on ayaptivs
Vy Le pot tol ise 1
tr,
lagen si
we would have
euonl'y

SS Abterian pole shuri
at nadonal
viewpuind ae ane t
ci. Ma
Hina
Tyianae
tie to be vers rol wide ry
and that is the treinenitans ef
kn pelsice due thy
tine on bauer Fred besbs af vont

Pram the purely ennep
are minny edie sol thy wot
Maca 7
muse hot tive

dost riaslist, 1

[

Yale

nigi
yf lived hopes

nite dhe F

we would be
forvigae

wlon a
1 the walisitead nivilege
Present tine,

Chairmen Cenk. Tf the pats
thei sivbt inited te the coat ie

ared by

Pre
http://ia700508.us.archive.or:

Jeo wark dU
vanecnt but stapes

law fer nucay

ib ent take in
gv ibis Cris iniete
sirity FP chink it woult bs

rl esi} need walter pry

mente tly

Toreig
wrvity poilic

elvinvel ta Tinit the ee

Heke amie peut = Op

Kansas City Plant Page |
Bendix Small Reactor Development gl rage 9

ER DEVE LOPMEAT {uz

cots Led i One is thet i the
rights la any patent devolved frou
af pubic. fund rigs be
ayitired throngh «
eon ube pst which (ris cout
¥ ia arse ineasure is the atomic
‘Thea there i WES,
Goverment policy
the worked, asl the

De uurtially

whe oe
yirevidies siftirdent
fick), perbaps nok os a
ite pubiow
pt wand thet inases
1 obec
omg iecely chisun ds enw eu
cliater step f theiak We dads greed par
fel Goverarment virwponits. ane peur
nis Wath cuatietasd seri ty

atiot wh SrIDEeRE ¥
nth tle nestig sind in tle

1

Hier
friwuently. In
roduet ovnitabde

world

Feemeaneri on that, Me, Chitienan

woautt weleotie it.

tht apy
HPL al
a) development
Cone eee. wer

espeek to the des
| derhnelog

the firt tl

seal pasion i

pee be
AD thy

y the United Stites that contd
laky use alurnie power, Seowe

oh re
Towels. gust bo orivee seit
Weer:
fh the develapaiend nf vats pil

sight of perhaps the
ras, ever el

der dnveatens Live
tes, de you Chins

esi Le
Fileal

Sy wee pe
ok tlhe

Page, 9
a = ms. 2/22/38


Prepared by: Kansas City Plant
MN encix Small Reactor Development Page 10

AUS ATOMIC POWER DEVELOPMENT
that would provide sullieient incoutive for Chem le becom active i die
fielsl?
Mr, Hytaxn, TC beli L would a8 a tbat step,
an Cone. Worlit uot that live be substantially as event

ag Oiough they had Ge patorne eiglis chrmgdhont Che wacht?

Mr. Tiviaxp, Ttlink so, for she reason that tnloubtedly the Gav-
eroiueri may want tache past us auxigis is we wee ta exploit these
athier aceasoxeept that it could be done in en ordecly and protected

ressinnn Cole?

OTR wvcial

say that (au Benslix
soe sort sf tubing covives a
That wits used ina commercial
Leas say if had ty
no cosnertion with the
plectronie gsule

ne where we ¥ ip alone
Aviation Carp, were atde ta devel
irnalic av el Stand lis lee
leat: sty for the whale power
connecter with: the Fi phnise
i prenlucn ited hdr
TF that breesttiid a staitnts ‘ ;
we prodave ite, we Tne Che prolliny ative af thai i
fathe warhl Where we der rsa al paulsant Jemekgyerentacl oe ade be
Wonenteal parent posttianr in dhiosy saul ries, we coulcivt develop the
expert marker

Tinlustry mast see the potential of developing this export murket,
ti hut. in the best ipierests of our Government that it should

is inderestey) ri ned giving away wing away its
Swi ex pork sarkeé on sbunlard dems, and pire
ee tle items which might he shipped one of l

at yvather detached
Dut dev rhe leas in
ne Ove

rox aut ip the Cubare, »
[abicrse OF tdsmetig: ean as we think thout
tl jogs Cavets of what we ante €

ple oir the pytette siceabionts Whis: ere wee ane borkey: repr it
f heat v3 od xeglon, a very bugis region in
y tiedeh. Wis tyoule bee to son this 6 FT clevelogs ene
tes} with ol als ¥ iualtttvies vu Te bheuse
ofl . Hreradly tbat, types
ext car or sl) dt yrars applicable

le invented int
eas Cech nebag
vat ix
Tal Che penton,
Hinabetle erence: Mord wa

ype. You hive
vleten pp teu wus basic fo the uute-
sto Dveak that putens ‘Phe
iow sitvenmboes the paces atver is Che atitoniobgbe tell
adden beri Ly) MODY sink jnshenel we live
bitelyeds of thousands of patents today apple inv fo almost jucoise-
yrendia things bi the witometive art.

Lebo pot Knew how qian’ yevlents tere ani
alone. bec TP woulel suess there Tnive dee aver I

it le in just a beeke
200 putouts applied

tal development of the futnre
ut [bie

iss the stiurulation oF teat}
viel Tike tee soe put ante this

wew

http://ia700508.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderimages, php? zip=/6/... 2/22/2013

Prepare y Es — Page 10


4. Incidents and Unusual Events
4.1, Facility or Area Evacuations
4.1.1. 1 recail the some of these events occurring.
4.1.2. |reported the event to best of my knowledge and belief in the
Attachment.

4.2. Spills and Leaks
4.2.1. I recall the some of these events occurring.
4.2.2. | reported the event to best of my knowledge and belief in the
Attachment.

4.3. Unusually High Exposures, Surface and Airborne Contamination
4.3.4. l recall the some of these events occurring.
4.3.2. | reported the event to best of my knowledge and belief in the
Attachment,

4.4, Involvement Or Knowledge of Recorded Incidents From SEM
4.4.1. Pm-147 leak
4.4.1.1. Lreported the event to best of my knowledge and belief in the
Attachment.
4.4.2, ALL LISTED FROM SEM

6. Medical Treatment and Recording Practices
5.1. Reporting Clinical Symptoms
5.2. Requesting Personal Protective Measures
§.3. Improper Diagnosis of Medicat Conditions
5.4.

6. Health and Safety Training
6.1, Chemical
6.2. Radiological Protection
6.3. Biolagical Agent

7. Protective Measures
7.1. Chemical
7.2, Radiological Protection
7.3. Biological Agent

8. Workplace Monitoring and Assessments
8.1. Chemical
8.2. Radiological Protection
8.3. Biological Agent

9. Waste Disposal Practices

10. Offsite Transfers of Contaminants

411. Environmental Releases


=

Special Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
under the Energy Employees Occupational Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
liness Compensation Act National Institute for Occupational Satety and Health

. OMB Number: 0920-0639 Expires: 09/20/2013
Special Exposure Cohort Petition — FormB *  Pageiot7

Use of this form and disclosure of Social Security Number are voluntary. Failure to use this form or disclose
this number will not result in the denial of any right, benefit, or privilege to which you may be entitled.
_

General Instructions on Completing this Form (compiete instructions are available in a séparate packel):
Except for signatures, please PRINT all information clearly and neatly on the form.

Please read each of Parts A — G in this form and complete the parts appropriate to you. If there is more
than one petitioner, then each petitioner should complete those sections of parts A — C of the form that apply
to them. Additional copies of the first two pages of this form are provided at the end of the form for this pur-
pose. Amaximum of three petitioners is allowed.

If you need more space to provide additional information, use the continuation page provided at the end of
the form and attach the completed continuation page(s) to Form B.

If you have questions about the use of this form, please call the following NIOSH toll-free phone number and
request to speak to someone in the Division of Compensation Analysis and Support about an SEC petition:
1-877-222-8570.

QA Labor Organization. StartatD on Page 3
Ifyou O An Energy Employee (current or former), StartatC on Page 2
are: Q A Survivor (of a former Energy Employee}, StartatB on Page 2

@ A Representative (of a current or former Energy Employee), StartatA on Page 1

A Representative Information — Complete Section A if you are authorized by an Employee or
Survivor(s) to petition on behalf of a class.

At Are you a contact person for an organization? @& Yes (Go to A.2) OD No (Go to A.3)

A.2 Organization Information:

Name o' a anization

A3 Name of Petiti ie
A4
A5 Telephone Number:

AZ Q Check the box at left to indicate you have attached to the back of this form written authorization to
petition by the survivor(s) or employee(s) indicated in Parts B or C of this form. An authorization

If you are representing a Survivor, go to Part B; if you are representing an Employee, go to Part C.

Name or Social Security Number of First Petitioner:



Affidavit


* Potential missed dose for monitored workers because of missing dosimeter results, actual
dose that was less than the detection capabilities of the dosimeters, or unrecorded doses in a
worker's exposure history.

+ Potential adjustments to the recorded dose because of considerations of the dosimetry
technology, calibration methods, and workpiace radiation fields that could have resulted in error
in the recorded dose.

“Evaluation of KCP worker dose to ensure that the occupational dose for each worker claim is
hot underestimated involves assessment of:

Potential unmonitored dose for workers who were not monitored for occupational radiation
exposure throughout their employment at KCP.”

Due the above findings, and the attached affidavits of former workers we seek SEC status for
KCP.

Stata of

ANOREAR SA
Notary Putiic - Noy
STATE OF MISSOURI

My Commissior  exaites. Aprd
Commission # 108s 12g 70"



Special Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

under the Energy Employees Occupational Centers for Disease Contre! and Prevention
lliness Compensation Act National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

7 OMB Number: 0920-0639 Expires: 09/20/2013
Special Exposure Cohort Petition — Form B Page 1 of 7

Use of this form and disclosure of Social Security Number are voluntary. Failure to use this form or disclose
this number will not result in the denial of any right, benefit, or privilege to which you may be entitled,

General Instructions on Completing this Form (complete instructions are available in a séparate packet):
Except for signatures, please PRINT all information clearly and neatly on the form.

Please read each of Parts A — G in this form and complete the parts appropriate ta you. If there is more
than one petitioner, then each petitianer should complete those sections of parts A—C of the form that apply
to them, Additional copies of the first two pages of this form are provided at the end of the form for this pur-
pose. A maximum of three petitioners is allowed.

lf you need more space to provide additional information, use the continuation page provided at the end of
the fonn and attach the completed continuation page(s) to Form B.

If you have questions about the use of this form, please call the foliowing NIOSH toll-free phone number and
request to speak to someone in the Division of Compensation Analysis and Support about an SEC petition:
1-877-222-8570.

QO ALabor Organization, StaratD on Page3

B® An Energy Employee (current or former), StatatC on Page2

if you
are: QO A Survivor (of a former Energy Employee), StattatB on Page 2

A Representative {of a current or former Energy Employee), StartatA on Page1

Representative Information — Complete Section A if you are authorized by an Employee or

Survivor(s) to petition on behalf of a class.

A.1 Are you a contact person for an organization? M Yes (Go to A.2) Q No (Go to A.3}

‘ eee
re
Po:

Name of Petition Representative:

As

iddle initial
A4 Address:

ity ip Code

AS Telephone Ne
A6 Email Address:

A7 ©] Check the box at left to indicate you have attached to the back of this form written authorization to
petition by the survivor(s) or employee(s) indicated in Parts B or C of this form. An authorization

If you are representing a Survivor, go to Part B; if you are representing an Employee, go to Part C.

Name or Social Security Number of First Petitioner: CC £ii#£i—_ ee



Prepared by: Kansas City Plant
a . Bendix Small Reactor Development

4065 ATOMNG POWEL DEVELOPMENT

poort fran industries, both large and s
national security, and with the blessing of the whole people.
if dew nthe Congres: resented by your com.
aid upon the Commission toartas a body with the inspiration,
heen typified by our great
inventors and te overcome the obstuclas thal. presently ve-
road development. af atomic pow
srecagnized the breadth and complexity of the
approach to the development of industrial power, For example, the
Detroit Bdison-Dew Chemiea] weep will) which we tiope te work is

I, with attention

oranizines to phig the industrial part in the
Ahinnist be rants, Other groups--iote Fhe group
arly « cel, many of them ineonbination with

Tans ar seve, Srualt and large indus-
The fatare potential of these many
tx treienclones.

new jedustrial opportunity is a chur.

ic of she eornpetitive system aud showld have tegistative and

cive encoumieeroenr. “Phe destiinouy already before your
commniites and the recommendations Crem che Commission itself have
suguestesh many ef th Ss for Jegislative chien.

ofthe Bovlis Aviction Corp. would saa up oar

deliherie

itl developmients shew that the
elapment las arstverl
tbe developed by and with the

HeEney 4
faww Force ne

wo, that, this ge:

nadia suppart of se tdastry, its
Three. (rae we shoubd in (Fhe present | non brand rather

I .
wose, plement ite purposes to the maxiasid, waned
sy for luvelopmont of atone energy for peaceful

Chaos a restrivtiy
alopi a clear pol

lation should permit brond Jacitude in the admin-
woof the lew to the end that sened mdustrind development
ze shalt be en-
ct neninst. the

Immraner i

Olina €
very Elon i
Onl

cuson. You have given us a
ed awl very well delivered.

doult knew, Chere is a resist-
qpnerters fo tl lowe le eapital to take adveotaye of
stilt be obtainert on on fein the present tow
nee the pre n veached
wl fans, You lis solie€ that
ryder ia: tHelk Le we inta plas Cie
swhiel: wailed ¢ industry, and

ivities,

sour thouvht en dhe efeet of relaxing the
fen of periniting an inventor to fave the
tien far aay purposes iy this country, bub
ria the Gavernnent. the owerrship of
stn farsicn covories ave concerned,

Page 8

http://ia700508.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderlmages. php?zip=/6/.... 2/22/2013

Prepares by

Page 8


3.2.1.1.4.

3.2.1.2. Process or tasks performed and associated exposurés "|

3.2,1.2.1.
3.2.1.2.2.
3.2.1.2.3.
3.2.1.2.4.
3.2.1.2.5
3.2.1.2.6
3.2.1.2.7.
3.2.1.2.8,
3.2.1.2.9.
3.2.1.2.10.

3.2.1.3 Departments and associated exposures
3.2.4.3.1.
3.2.1.3.2
3.2.1.3.3.
3.2.1.3.4,
3.2.1.3.5.

3.3. Unrecorded, Unacknowledged and Casual
1 understand the following statutory, regulatory and guidance requirements apply:

a. 20CFR § 30.23] (b) states: “Proof of exposure to a toxic substance may be established by the
submission of any appropriate document or information that is evidence that such substance
was present at the facility in which the employee was employed and that the employee came
into contact with such substance.

6. 20. CFR § 30.111 (@) states: “A claimant will not be entitled to any presumption otherwise
provided for in these regulations if substantial evidence exists that rebuts the existence of the
fact that is the subject of the presumption. Substantial evidence means such relevant evidence
as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. When such evidence
exists, the claimant shall be notified and afforded the opportunity to submit additional written
medical documentation or records.”

| interpret the above regulatory requirements to mean the claims examiners must provide me
with “substantial evidence” that demonstrates a named person with a “reasonable mind” would
say, under oath as ! am, that the following is not correct.

Based on the NIOSH Site exposure matrix, DOL SEM and in discussions/consuitation with
coworkers and (ies | now believe | was
exposed routinely exposed to the follawing without my knowiedge or provision to minimize my
exposure:
3.3.1. Radiation and radioactive materials
3.3.1.1. Many surface and airbome Uranium isotopes, Plutonium, Tritium, weapons
grade Uranium-235, Uranium -233, another nuclear weapons material, in addition to
daughter radioactive products and toxic chemicals.
3.3.1.2. While working on the roof top and passing by radiation generating machine
stations, t believe | was exposed to neutrons and other ionizing radiation from


SEC PETITION
KANSAS CITY PLANT

March 8, 2013


=— -

Kansas City Plant
Bendix Small Reactor Development Page 4

402 ATOMIC PUWRIC DEAUELOPALENT

and by the Commis
chunges made to eneourage
such a policy is decided upon
years before alomic powe:

Our se

ion, ond &

islative and regulatory
idey industrial participation. Until
each passing day ts a day added to the

4 be “on tho dine.”
Ned conchusion is Lhat brond progress of wtemic development
ould wot be contiaed to uny single cane

p.; nor should it be chan-

nelized th any one direction, Grealer private participation may take
many Fornig, cetermined by the specittc needs and opportunities of
particular projects and the appropriate contyilutions by beth the

Ciovermment and privat
fenuck of informution end.

indusiry. What the €

oxperionce aire

2
>
3
é
5
=
e
g

a
Ee
J
=
o
5.
Fs

a
i

tion that is
‘The spe
tient and doelnates
jr tiewlay project. We 1
wits for the Commi:
elfoctive i

ac

Deh al

ihinations.

dn ye these cone
to ns te tave great signif

av davelopme
Indust’ Conference B,
von feruners on priy
have been extremely well at
Init the wuigae
new Prentier asd
progress on a broad

“Tse, Jasine

z

view also

fic combination of the capabilities and

spenk br

legislative and admini
iomitly nee retailing
and diversified front.

liare:y

? p :
mld vary with the requivements of each
1 purpose snc adlitinistrative

iS the hest means to arrive at the most

ions several considerations have seamed

I will ens brietly. :
spicuous wiy both enthn-
whieh lie in the field of

the National

ended,

ith Ube pe

ful applications of atomie

Ghat de

opment has nut ye

Pewcved! fo the pomt wher

ae Fiat
farpe commensiit nucrkets or ap povtune

ATihetien Mitors, With respect. fe pawar, wy koow

Avs we_likely to Le _prohtrble—
rai -

ib is possible

Te eerie tent by nuclear py nd that from this heat, power
for the proprlsion of eertitn maival vessels can be vbtained where
pweformance and other factor Depertant Laan cost.

There is yin our opisi evidenee that power con

neonate] tt whic
to, and dies

gad tas ciren
WOU, ws eibliow con frasins
the lack of saffiereitt fact
trent, “Whew
is to do whatevar aiditignad
to provide Hone &

“Lhe developie
paintal proces
rund in their 0
the thon exis

tL of sey tie

inal eoneey

http://ia700508.us.archive.or,
Prepared by

J equipment in tie comainercial 4

© Steam, gsengines, and diesels

RE Prone ampvecs,

y compete with lydrantic,
rket. We do not
heen supported by expert testi-
ramming bal mither as evidence af
renee upon which to b sone
ng. opinins do vary. “The remecy
resenrch and development are required

mv energy: principle abways lias heen a
all had their problems
were tot eemondeally competitive with
ainatter of fret, they are today

BookReader/BookReaderlmages.php?zip=/6/.... 2/22/2013



12. Legal Actions and Cases

12.1. Administrative Under EEOICPA
12.1.1. KCP Worker
12.1.2. Non-KCP Worker

12.2. Judicial
12.2.1.KCP Worker
12.2.2. Non-KCP Worker

JON SUPPES
Notary Public - Notary Seal
STATE OF MISSOURI!
JACKSON COUNTY
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOV. 7, 2018
COMMISSION # 11384975



written on cards that were nearly iHegible.” In addition, the findings of this report state
under the heading ‘UNMONITORED WORKER,’ “Generally, the occupations for which

bioassay data have not been found are nurses, miscellaneous repairers, construction
workers, and equipment operators.”

Finally, under section 6.4 entitled ‘DOSE RECONSTRUCTION’ the authors of this
document find: "Evaluation of KCP worker dose to ensure that the occupational dose far each worker
claim is not underestimated involves assessment of:

« Potential unmonitored dose for workers who were not monitored for accupationat
radiation exposure throughout their employment at KCP.”

+ Potential missed dose for monitored workers because of missing dosimeter resutts.
actual dose that was fess than the detection capabilities of the dosimeters, or
unrecorded doses in a worker's exposure history.

* Potential adjustments to the recorded dose because of considerations of the dosimetry
technology, calibration methods, and workplace radiation freids thet could have resulted
in error in the recorded dose.

Due the above findings, and the attached affidavits of former workers, we seek SEC status for
the Kansas City Plant

Sincerely,

ee
sy
JOSHUA SIANO
NOTARY PUBLIC
Fulton County - State of Georgia
_ My Camm, Exvires July 28, 2014



February 28, 2013

SEC Petition

National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, MS-C47
4676 Coiumbia Parkway

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

RE: SEC Petition for the Kansas City Plant
To Whom It May Concern,

On behalf of the following class of employees | wish to submit a request for Special
Exposure Cohort under 42 CFR Part 83 of the ACT. I contend that the radiological program
and capability to perform with “sufficient accuracy’ worker dose reconstructions has been
gravely compromised due to lack monitoring. | also contend that the following classes of
employers, from the best of my knowledge, were not monitored for radiation exposure.

¢ Managers and administrators, engineers, too! makers, repair technicians, health
technicians, technologist, maintenance worker, electricians, mechanics, pipe
fitters, sub-contractors, security personnel, sheet metal workers (operators),
plant/system/utility operators, machine set-up operators, welders/saldiers,
precision production workers, drivers, handlers/laborers/helpers, nurses, and
miscellaneous employees.

According to the Site profile for the Kansas City Plant (docurnent ORAUT-TKBS-0031)
provided by the ORAU Team, Dade Moeller & Associates, and the MJW Corporation
report dated 05/31/2005 section 5.14.3 (pg. 20), “Due fo the nature of the work
performed at KCP, and because no accident were found, it is reasonable to assume
that intakes of DU from 1953 to 1971 were chronic unless the individuals dosimetry
records indicate otherwise.” However, the following paragraph states, “The results of
individual measurements were written on cards that were nearly illegible.” in addition,
the findings of this report state under the heading ‘UNMONITORED WORKER,’
“Generally, the occupations for which bioassay data have not been found are nurses,
miscellaneous repairers, construction workers, and equipment operators.” Finally,
under section 6.4 entitled ‘DOSE RECONSTRUCTION' the authors of this document
find: