alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-144688, 333-127034, 333-114231, 333-168011) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-145719, 333-54164, 333-166272) of our report datedFebruary 1, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements, the financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear on this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE, LLP
 
 
 Minneapolis, Minnesota
 February 1, 2011
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00694

- CV

Robert LEAL and Ramiro Leal,

Appellants

v.

CUANTO ANTES MEJOR L LC

, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 02

- 00041

- CVK

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order and Final

Judgment Regarding Summary Judgment is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellee recover its costs of appeal from appellants.

SIGNED July 1 , 2015.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

June 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

03-41071 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HERMANEGILDO ALANIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas

(C-02-CR-340-5)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

On a previous appeal, we affirmed Hermanegildo Alaniz’s gulity

plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy to po ssess more than

100 kilograms of marijuana w ith intent to distribute. U nited

States v. Alaniz

, 03-41071, 2004 WL 1427086 (5th Cir. 23 June

2004). The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari; vacated the

judgment; and remanded for further consid eration in the light of2

Un ited States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). A laniz v. U.S.

,

125 S. Ct. 1022 (2005).

Based on Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Alaniz

first challen ged the constitutionality of his conviction and

sentence, in his appeal to our court. Because Alaniz did not raise

in district court his objection to the constitution ality of his

sentence, our review is only for p lain error. U nited States v.

Mares

, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed

,

(U.S. 31 Mar. 2005) (No. 04-9517). Under plain-error review, our

court may correct a defendant's sentence only if there is a clear

or obvious error that affects his substantial rights. E .g. , United

States v. Cotton , 535 U.S. 625, 631 (2002). Even then, we retain

discretion whether to correct the error; generally, we will not do

so unless the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or

public reputation of judicial proceedings. Id.

Alaniz has met the first two prongs of plain error: the

district court erred in sentencing him under a mand atory, as

opposed to advisory, guidelines regime; and that error was “plain”.

To satisfy the third prong, Alaniz must show by “a reasonable

probability that, but for the error claimed, the result of the

proceeding would have been different”. U nited States v. DominguezBeni tez , 124 S. Ct. 2333, 2339 (2004) (quotation and internal

brackets omitted). Thus, the inquiry is whether Alaniz can

demonstrate the result of his proceeding would have likely been3

significantly different under an advisory regime. M ares , 402 F.3d

at 521. Alaniz has pointed to nothing in the record indicating

that the district court would have sentenced him differently under

an ad visory sentencing regime. (For possible further review, he

maintains Mares is erroneous.) Therefore, he has not established

that his substantial rights were affected. Accordingly, we

reinstate our judgment affirming Alaniz’s conviction and sentence.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of ChiefFinancial OfficerPursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant toSection 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Michael V. Valenza, the Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Radnor Holdings Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:

|                                       | The Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 27, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         |                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|                                       | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                        |

| Dated:  March 11, 2003  | /s/  Michael V. Valenza                              |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |       Michael V. Valenza       Senior VicePresident-Finance and      Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dolat Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Shmuel Dovid Hauck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated this 19thday of January, 2011./s/ Shmuel Dovid HauckShmuel Dovid Hauck, Director and Chief Executive Officer
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-12-00476-CR 

________________________

JOE DANIEL LUNA, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 242nd District Court 

Hale County, Texas 

Trial Court No. B19083-1203, Honorable Edward L. Self, Presiding 

 

July 11, 2013 

 

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REASONABLE BAIL 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

By opinion dated May 28, 2013, this Court reformed the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction for a third degree felony assault to misdemeanor assault. That portion of the 

judgment assessing punishment was reversed and the cause was remanded to the trial 

court for a new punishment hearing. Pending before us is appellant’s motion for 

reasonable bail. Pursuant to our request, the State filed a response by which it does 

not oppose bail being set. We grant appellant’s motion. 
2

Article 44.04(h) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides that upon 

reversal of a conviction, a defendant is entitled to release on reasonable bail, regardless 

of the length of term of imprisonment, pending final determination of the appeal by the 

State or defendant on petition for discretionary review. The statute further provides this 

Court shall determine the amount of bail if it is requested before a petition for 

discretionary review has been filed.

It appearing that appellant is entitled to the relief requested, pursuant to article 

44.04(h), the Court hereby sets reasonable bail in the amount of $5,000, conditioned as 

the law requires. 

It is so ordered.

 Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
ton,
s ty
Z° Se DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service
rea
National institute for Occupational
Safety and Health
Robert A. Taft Laboratories
4676 Columbia Parkway

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998
Phone: 513-533-6825,
Fax: 513-533-6826

December 12, 2006

Peter M. Turcic, Director

Division of Energy Employees Occupational Iiness Compensation
U.S. Department of Labor

Room C-4511

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20210

Subject: SEC00061 Notice of Final Effect
Dear Mr. Turcic:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required
by 42 CFR. pt. 83.17(c), Lam notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a
class of employees at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, as an
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness
Compensation Program Act of 2000. On November 9, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C.
7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the
SEC:

Employees of the Department of Energy predecessor agencies and their contractors or
subcontractors who were monitored or should have been monitored for exposure to
ionizing radiation associated with radioactive lanthanum (RaLa) operations at
Technical Area 10 (Bayo Canyon Site), Technical Area 35 (Ten Site), and Buildings
H, Sigma, and U (located within Technical Area 1) for a number of work days
aggregating at least 250 work days during the period from September 1, 1944,
through July 18, 1963, or in combination with work days within the parameters
established for one or more classes of employees in the SEC.

This designation became effective on December 9, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C.
73841(14)(C). Hence, beginning on December 9, 2006, members of this class of employees, defined
as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

Sincerely,

> Qh
§-) Lamy J. Eliott, MSPH, CTH

Director
Office of Compensation Analysis and Support
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1355

In re: MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. (3:17-cr-00351-JFA-1)

Submitted: May 8, 2023 Decided: June 22, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Kenny Carter, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1355 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Kenny Carter petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district 

court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to dismiss his criminal case for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to 

act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the

motion on May 2, 2023. Accordingly, because the district court has recently acted on 

Carter’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1355 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, being the Chairman of Kinetek, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m (a)) and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:   November 2, 2005

 

/s/ Thomas H. Quinn                     

Thomas H. Quinn

Chairman
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1456 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1456

    For the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 1999

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    For the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF BACK PAY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of 
any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Mr. Rocco A. 
Trecosta of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the sum of $10,000 for 
compensation for back pay not received as an employee of the Department 
of Defense Overseas Dependent Schools for service performed during the 
period beginning April 14, 1966, through June 30, 1975.
    (b) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.
    (c) Full Satisfaction of Claims.--The payment authorized under 
subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of all claims of Rocco A. 
Trecosta against the United States for back pay in connection with his 
service in the Department of Defense Overseas Dependent Schools.
    (d) Limitation on Agents and Attorneys Fees.--No more than 10 
percent of the payment authorized by this Act may be paid to or 
received by any agent or attorney for services rendered in connection 
with obtaining such payment, any contract to the contrary 
notwithstanding. Any person who violates this subsection shall be 
guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine in the amount 
provided in title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

 

 National Institute for Occupational

 Safety and Health

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998

 Phone: 877-222-7570

 Fax: 513-533-6826

 

 August 24, 2010

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00169

Ms. Rachel Leiton

Division of Energy Employees Occupational

Illness Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

Room C-4511

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20210

Dear Ms. Leiton:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from BWX Technologies, Inc., in Lynchburg, Virginia, as an addition to the 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000. On July 13, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary 

of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at BWX Technologies, Inc., in 

Lynchburg, Virginia from January 1, 1959 through December 31, 1959; and/or from January 

1, 1968 through December 31, 1972, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 

work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days 

within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special 

Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on August 12, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on August 12, 2010, members of this class of employees, defined 

as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

 Sincerely,

 [Signature on file]

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director

 Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0001029850
<NAME>                     Orion Network Systems, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                   US Dollar

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      42,187,807
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,573,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,244,526
<PP&E>                                     351,513,496
<DEPRECIATION>                             (68,224,957)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             358,264,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       63,029,250
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 20,902,366
<COMMON>                                       112,447
<OTHER-SE>                                    (548,815)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               358,264,444
<SALES>                                        500,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,847,292
<CGS>                                          376,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               78,200,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,388,243
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               919,453
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          25,450,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (27,111,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    84,059
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (27,195,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (27,195,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.62)




</TABLE>
Exhibit




EXHIBIT 10.24
UGI CORPORATION
DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT
FOR
JOHN L. WALSH


John L. Walsh is President and Chief Executive Officer of UGI Corporation.  Mr. Walsh has an oral compensation arrangement with UGI Corporation which includes the following: 
Mr. Walsh:
		
	1.
	is entitled to an annual base salary, which for fiscal year 2015 was $1,079,728;


		
	2.
	participates in UGI Corporation’s annual bonus plan, with bonus payable based on the achievement of pre-approved financial and/or business performance objectives that support business plans and strategic goals;


		
	3.
	participates in UGI Corporation’s long-term compensation plans, UGI Corporation’s 2004 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as amended, and UGI Corporation’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan;


		
	4.
	will receive cash benefits upon termination of his employment without cause following a change in control of UGI Corporation; and


		
	5.
	participates in UGI Corporation’s benefit plans, including the UGI Pension Plan, Senior Executive Employee Severance Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, UGI Savings Plan, and Supplemental Savings Plan.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-54164) of our report dated January 11, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Vascular Solutions, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Vascular Solutions,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 4, 2002
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 FILE COPY



# 5/27/2015 HS? \£&& COANo. 12-13-00338-CR CARNEY, CHADALAN Tr. Ct. No. F1219065 PD-0195-15 

### This is to serve notice to the court ofappeals that this Court granted a motion for extension oftime to file a petition for discretionary review until May 1, 2015. The 

### timeforfiling the petitionfordiscretionaryreview has expired. Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *