23206 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

b. Number of Pets. 

Financial Resources 

a. Average Annual Income Range: Less 

than $25,000; $25,000–$35,000; $35,000– 

$45,000; $45,000–$55,000; $55,000–$65,000; 

$65,000–$75,000; and $75,000 and above. 

b. Describe if anyone residing in the home 

receives any kind of public assistance 

(financial needs-based government subsidies 

for food or housing). 

c. Identify those personal expenses 

expected to be covered by the student. 

Diet 

a. Does anyone in the family follow any 

dietary restrictions? (Y/N) 

If yes, describe: 

b. Do you expect the student to follow any 

dietary restrictions? (Y/N) 

If yes, describe: 

c. Would you feel comfortable hosting a 

student who follows a particular dietary 

restriction (ex. Vegetarian, Vegan, etc.)? (Y/N) 

d. Would the family provide three (3) 

square meals daily? 

High School Information 

a. Name and address of school (private or 

public school). 

b. Name, address, e-mail and telephone 

number of school official. 

c. Approximate size of the school student 

body. 

d. Approximate distance between the 

school and your home. 

e. Approximate start date of the school 

year. 

f. How will the exchange student get to the 

school (e.g. bus, carpool, walk)? 

g. Would the family provide special 

transportation for extracurricular activities 

after school or in the evenings, if required? 

h. Which, if any, of your family’s children, 

presently attend the school in which the 

exchange visitor is enrolled? 

If applicable list sports/clubs/activities, if 

any, your child(ren) participate(s) in at the 

school. 

i. Does any member of your household 

work for the high school in a coaching/ 

teaching/or administrative capacity? 

j. Has any member of your household had 

contact with a coach regarding the hosting of 

an exchange student with particular athletic 

ability? 

If yes, please describe the contact and 

sport. 

Community Information 

a. In what type of community do you live 

(e.g.: Urban, Suburban, Rural, Farm). 

b. Population of community. 

c. Nearest Major City (Distance and 

population). 

d. Nearest Airport (Distance). 

e. City or town Web site. 

f. Briefly describe your neighborhood and 

community. 

g. What points of interest are near your 

area (parks, museums, historical sites)? 

h. Areas in or near neighborhood to be 

avoided? 

Home Description 

a. Describe your type of home (e.g., single 

family home, condominium, duplex, 

apartment, mobile home) and include 

photographs of the host family home’s 

exterior and grounds, kitchen, student’s 

bedroom, student’s bathroom, and family and 

living areas. 

b. Describe Primary Rooms and Bedrooms. 

c. Number of Bathrooms. 

d. Will the exchange student share a 

bedroom? (Y/N) 

If yes, with which household resident? 

e. Describe the student’s bedroom. 

f. Describe amenities that student has 

access to. 

g. Utilities. 

Family Activities 

a. Language spoken in home. 

b. Please describe activities and/or sports 

each family members participate in: 

(e.g., camping, hiking, dance, crafts, 

debate, drama, art, music, reading, soccer, 

baseball, horseback riding). 

c. Describe your expectations regarding the 

responsibilities and behavior of the student 

while in your home (e.g., homework, 

household chores, curfew (school night and 

weekend), access to refrigerator and food, 

drinking of alcoholic beverages, driving, 

smoking, computer/Internet/E-Mail). 

d. Would you be willing voluntarily to 

inform the exchange visitor in advance of any 

religious affiliations of household members? 

(Y/N) 

e. Would any member of the household 

have difficulty hosting a student whose 

religious beliefs were different from their 

own? (Y/N) Note: A host family may want the 

exchange visitor to attend one or more 

religious services or programs with the 

family. The exchange visitor cannot be 

required to do so, but may decide to 

experience this facet of U.S. culture at his or 

her discretion. 

f. How did you learn about being a host 

family? 

Dated: April 26, 2010. 

Stanley S. Colvin, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Private Sector 

Exchange, Bureau of Educational and 

Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10168 Filed 4–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0020] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; AVI September Fireworks 

Display, Laughlin, NV 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a 

safety zone on the navigable waters of 

the lower Colorado River, Laughlin, NV, 

in support of a fireworks display near 

the AVI Resort and Casino. This safety 

zone is necessary to provide for the 

safety of the participants, crew, 

spectators, participating vessels, and 

other vessels and users of the waterway. 

Persons and vessels are prohibited from 

entering into, transiting through, or 

anchoring within this safety zone unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port, or 

his designated representative. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before June 2, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2010–0020 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Corey 

McDonald, Waterways Management, 

U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, 

Coast Guard; telephone 619–278–7262, 

e-mail Corey.R.McDonald@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing or 

submitting material to the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2010–0020), 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules 23207 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2010–0020’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010– 

0020’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

The Coast Guard proposes to establish 

a temporary safety zone on the 

navigable waters of the Lower Colorado 

River in support of a fireworks show in 

the navigation channel of the Lower 

Colorado River, Laughlin, NV. The 

fireworks show is being sponsored by 

AVI Resort and Casino. The safety zone 

would be set at an 800 foot radius 

around the firing site. This temporary 

safety zone is necessary to provide for 

the safety of the show’s crew, spectators, 

participants of the event, participating 

vessels, and other vessels and users of 

the waterway. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes a safety 

zone that would be enforced from 8 p.m. 

to 9:45 p.m. on September 5, 2010. The 

limits of the safety zone would include 

all navigable waters within 800 feet of 

the firing location adjacent to the AVI 

Resort and Casino centered in the 

channel between Laughlin Bridge and 

the northwest point of AVI Resort and 

Casino Cove in position: 35°00′93′′ N, 

114°38′28′′ W. 

This safety zone is necessary to 

provide for the safety of the crews, 

spectators, and participants of the event 

and to protect other vessels and users of 

the waterway. Persons and vessels 

would be prohibited from entering into, 

transiting through, or anchoring within 

this safety zone unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port, or his designated 

representative. 

U.S. Coast Guard personnel would 

enforce this safety zone. Other Federal, 

State, or local agencies may assist the 

Coast Guard, including the Coast Guard 

Auxiliary. Vessels or persons violating 

this rule would be subject to both 

criminal and civil penalties. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. Although the safety zone would 

restrict boating traffic within the 

navigable waters of the Lower Colorado 

River, Laughlin, NV, the effect of this 

regulation would not be significant as 

the safety zone would encompass only 

a portion of the waterway and would be 

very short in duration. Traffic could 

pass around the safety zone or through 

it with permission from the Captain of 

the Port. The entities most likely to be 

affected are pleasure craft engaged in 

recreational activities and sightseeing. 

As such, the Coast Guard expects the 

economic impact of this rule to be 

minimal. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

This proposed rule would affect the 

following entities, some of which might 

be small entities: the owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor in the region of the lower 

Colorado River adjacent to AVI Resort 

and Casino from 8 p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on 

September 5, 2010. 

This safety zone will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the following reasons. The safety zone 

only encompasses a portion of the 

waterway; it is short in duration at a 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
23208 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

relatively late hour when commercial 

traffic is low; and the Captain of the Port 

may authorize entry into the zone, if 

necessary. Before the effective period, 

the Coast Guard will publish a local 

notice to mariners (LNM) and will issue 

broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) 

alerts via marine channel 16 VFH before 

the safety zone is enforced. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Petty Officer 

Corey McDonald, Waterways 

Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector 

San Diego, at 619–278–7262. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this proposed rule or any policy or 

action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or Tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule would not 

result in such an expenditure, we do 

discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not effect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

Tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian Tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian Tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule 

involves establishing a safety zone and 

is categorically excluded under figure 

2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the 

Instruction. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T11–299 to read as 

follows: 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 84 / Monday, May 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules 23209 

§ 165.T11–299; Safety Zone; AVI 

September Fireworks Display; Laughlin, 

Nevada, NV. 

(a) Location. The limits of the safety 

zone are as follows: all navigable waters 

within 800 feet of the firing location 

adjacent to the AVI Resort and Casino 

centered in the channel between 

Laughlin Bridge and the northwest 

point of AVI Resort and Casino Cove in 

position: 35°00′93′′ N, 114°38′28′′ W. 

(b) Enforcement Period. This section 

will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 9:45 

p.m. on September 5, 2010. If the event 

concludes prior to the scheduled 

termination time, the Captain of the Port 

will cease enforcement of this safety 

zone and will announce that fact via 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

(c) Definitions. The following 

definition applies to this section: 

designated representative, means any 

commissioned, warrant, and petty 

officers of the Coast Guard on board 

Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, 

and local, state, and Federal law 

enforcement vessels who have been 

authorized to act on the behalf of the 

Captain of the Port. 

(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit 

through or anchoring within this safety 

zone is prohibited unless authorized by 

the Captain of the Port of San Diego or 

his designated on-scene representative. 

(2) Mariners requesting permission to 

transit through the safety zone may 

request authorization to do so from the 

Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The 

PATCOM may be contacted on VHF–FM 

Channel 16. 

(3) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the 

designated representative. 

(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast 

Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, 

flashing light, or other means, the 

operator of a vessel shall proceed as 

directed. 

(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted 

by other Federal, State, or local 

agencies. 

Dated: April 19, 2010. 

T.H. Farris, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Diego. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10204 Filed 4–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0250] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Chicago Tall Ships 

Fireworks, Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a temporary safety zone on 

Lake Michigan within Chicago Harbor 

near Navy Pier in Chicago, Illinois. This 

zone is intended to restrict vessels from 

a portion of Chicago Harbor due to a 

fireworks display. This proposed safety 

zone is necessary to protect the 

surrounding public and their vessels 

from the hazards associated with a 

fireworks display. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before June 2, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2010–0250 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail CWO2 Jon Grob, U.S. 

Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan; 

telephone 414–747–7188, e-mail 

Jon.K.Grob@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2010–0250), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2010–0250’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2; by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS