alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New Jersey Mining
Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred W. Brackebusch, President, Treasurer and Director of New
Jersey Mining Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2009

By /s/ FRED W. BRACKEBUSCH Fred W. Brackebusch,
President, Treasurer & Director

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Forbes Energy Services Ltd. filed on Form 10-Q (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Crisp, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ John E. CrispJohn E. Crisp Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: May 15, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of Re-Establishment of the National Petroleum Council.

Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, App., and section 102-3.65, Title 41, Code of Federal Regulations, and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the National Petroleum Council has been re-established for a two-year period.

The Council will continue to provide advice, information, and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on matters relating to oil and natural gas, or the oil and natural gas industries. The Secretary of Energy has determined that renewal of the National Petroleum Council is essential to the conduct of the Department's business and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed by law upon the Department of Energy. The Council will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the General Services Administration Final Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, and other directives and instructions issued in implementation of those acts.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Rachel Samuel at (202) 586-3279.

Issued at Washington, DC, on December 30, 2009.

Carol A. Matthews,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-10 Filed 1-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 4.14


 





THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE


CANCER PREVENTION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.



2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


 


This Third Amendment to the Cancer Prevention
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective July 17, 2014.


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Cancer
Prevention Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) has adopted and the stockholders of
the Company have approved the Plan, as amended; and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it
to be in the best interest of the Corporation to amend the Plan in order to increase the maximum number of shares of common stock
that may be subject to Awards and sold under the Plan from 3,525,562 shares (post stock split) to 5,500,000 (post stock split).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended
as follows:


 


		1.	Section 3(a) shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:



 


“3(a) Stock Subject to the Plan.
Subject to the provisions of Section 11 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be subject to Awards and sold
under the Plan is 5,500,000 Shares. The Shares may be authorized but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.”


 


		2.	Except as amended herein, the terms and provision of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies that the foregoing Third Amendment of the Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company.


 


 


	 	 	 	 
	 	CANCER PREVENTION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Jeffrey Jacob	 
	 	 	
        Jeffrey Jacob, Chairman and

        Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 21, 2019

No. 04-16-00593-CV

Alvin M. BURNS and I.M. Burns,

Appellants

v.

DIMMIT COUNTY, TEXAS, Roberto Ramirez, and Edward Dryden, Eusebio Cantu Torres, 

Eusebio Torres, Jr., Gladiator Energy Services, LLC, Hope Balderas, Juan Morales Balderas, and 

Lucia Balderas Lopez,

Appellees

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-07-11738-DCV

Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant’s motion for rehearing, and the motion is hereby 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
KENNETH THOMPSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1426

_________ __________________/

Opinion filed March 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. McC allum , Judge

.

Andy Thomas , Public Defender, Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender,
Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Att orney General, Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., WOLF and B.L. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit
13.2







PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Annual Report of Knightsbridge Tankers Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Inger M. Klemp, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
June 30, 2009





/s/
Inger M. Klemp





Inger
M. Klemp


Principal
Financial Officer
















SK 01655 0002 1008079
v4
Exhibit 10.13
                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                 ENRON CORP. 1991 STOCK PLAN
       (As Amended and Restated Effective May 6, 1997)


     WHEREAS, ENRON CORP. (the "Company") has heretofore
adopted and maintains the Enron Corp. 1991 Stock Plan, as
amended and restated effective May 6, 1997 (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective as of May
6, 1997, as follows:

     1.  The following sentence is added to Section 5.3(ii)
of the Plan:

     "Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless Shares of
     Restricted Stock are granted in lieu of cash
     compensation or to compensate for benefits lost due to
     statutory and/or plan earnings limits, restrictions
     placed on Awards granted under Section 5.3(vi) herein
     shall lapse in not less than one year for performance-
     based Awards, and other Awards granted under this
     Section 5.3 shall not lapse in total in less than three
     years."

     AS AMENDED HEREBY, the Plan is specifically ratified
and reaffirmed.


Date:  May 6, 1997.

                              ENRON CORP.


                              By: /s/ PHILIP J. BAZELIDES
                              Title: Philip J. Bazelides
                                     Vice President
                                     Compensation & Benefits

ATTEST:


/s/ PEGGY B. MENCHACA
Peggy B. Menchaca
Corporate Secretary
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with
      the report of Med-Emerg International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
      the
      period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Danis Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:








1) The
      Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2) The
      information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: February
                28, 2006By:
                /s/
                William DanisName:
                William
                DanisTitle:
                Chief
                Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code, the undersigned, Michael T. Kennedy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Radnor Holdings Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:



The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2005 |  | /s/ Michael T. Kennedy               
|                      |  | Michael T. Kennedy                   
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        



A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Décor Products
International, Inc., (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rui Sheng Liu, Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify
that:
 
 (1)    the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)    information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
 
 
 
 /s/ Rui Sheng
Liu
 Rui Sheng
Liu
 Chief
Executive Officer and President
 
 
 Date: May
17, 2010
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by us pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of
the Quarterly Report of Décor Products International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NOBLE DRILLING HOLDING, L.L.C.,

Defendant BelowAppellant,

v.

DAVID CARNES,

Plaintiff BelowAppellee.

§

§

§ No. 208, 2017

§

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. N15C-11-182

§ 

§

Submitted: June 13, 2017

 Decided: June 19, 2017

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

This 19th day of June 2017, upon consideration of the notice of interlocutory 

appeal and the supplemental notice of interlocutory appeal, it appears to the Court 

that:

(1) The defendant-appellant, Noble Drilling Holding, LLC (“Noble

Drilling”), is a Delaware corporation. Noble Drilling has petitioned this Court under 

Supreme Court Rule 42 to accept an interlocutory appeal from a memorandum

opinion of the Superior Court dated April 27, 2017 (“the Memorandum Opinion”). 

The Memorandum Opinion denied Noble Drilling’s motion to dismiss or motion for 

judgment on the pleadings, finding that the complaint alleged sufficient facts to 

invoke the Superior Court’s maritime jurisdiction under traditional admiralty 
2

principles and, alternatively, that whether the court had jurisdiction under the 

Admiralty Extension Act required resolution of factual issues that were 

inappropriate on a motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings. 

(2) Noble Drilling filed an application for certification to take an 

interlocutory appeal of the Memorandum Opinion in the Superior Court on May 8, 

2017. The plaintiff-appellee, David Carnes, filed his response in opposition on May 

18, 2017. 

(3) The Superior Court denied the certification application on June 6, 2017. 

In denying certification, the Superior Court noted that the Memorandum Opinion 

did not, as Noble Drilling argued, sustain the trial court’s controverted jurisdiction, 

but instead had rejected Noble Drilling’s argument that the complaint failed to state 

a claim. Even if the Memorandum Opinion had sustained the trial court’s 

controverted jurisdiction, the Superior Court held that certification was not 

warranted because the case is not exceptional, and the potential benefits of

interlocutory review do not outweigh the inefficiency, disruption, and probable costs

caused by an interlocutory appeal. 

(4) We agree that interlocutory review is not warranted in this case. 

Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this 

Court. In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the application 
3

for interlocutory review does not meet the strict standards for certification under 

Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within 

interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6362

ELLIS BARBER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHIEF JUDGE SPECIAL COURT OF APPEALS; HOWARD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; HOWARD COUNTY DIST COURT; HOWARD COUNTY POLICE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 00554

- RDB )

Submitted : July 31, 2017 Decided: August 16, 2017

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ellis Barber, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ellis Harley Barber appeals the distri ct court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barber v. Chief Judge Special Court of Appeals , No. 1:17

- cv
- 00554

- RDB (D. Md. Mar. 1, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and ar gument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00195

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director

Division of Energy Employees Occupational

 Illness Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321

Washington, District of Columbia 20210

Dear Ms. Leiton:

National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

1090 Tusculum Ave.

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938

Phone: 513-533-6825

Fax: 513-533-6826

August 11, 2014

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Nuclear Metals Inc. facility in West Concord, Massachusetts, as an 

addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000. On July 11, 2014, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §7384q(b), 

the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

“All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked at the facility owned by Nuclear Metals, Inc. 

(or a subsequent owner) in West Concord, Massachusetts, during the period from January 1, 

1980, through December 31, 1990, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work 

days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within

the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special 

Exposure Cohort.”

This designation became effective on August 10, 2014, as provided for under 42 U.S.C.

§7384l(14)(C). Therefore, beginning on August 10, 2014, members of this class of employees, 

defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

Sincerely,

[Signature on File]

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Eaglecrest Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine months ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Crystal Coranes, Chief Executive Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date: December 15, 2010








CRYSTAL CORANES


Crystal Coranes


Chief Executive Officer


and Director














-1-
----

----

Dolat Ventures 10-Q

| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2011 , fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report for the period ending May 31, 2011 , fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Dolat Ventures, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: July 22, 2011                                                                                |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                               |   |
| /s/ Shmuel Dovid Hauck                                                                             |   |
| Shmuel Dovid HauckPresident and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |   |
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 379TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on September 23, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Joe A. Gomez, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-14-00610-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2013CR4656

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the

judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on November 23, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853