alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, James P. Waters, Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of The Hillman Companies, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15eand 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: March 28, 2006 /s/ James P. Waters   James P. Waters   Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PERRY JOSEPH
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 2861

[ August 5, 2015 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Lisa M . Porter , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 04

- 1123 CF10D

.

Michael B. Cohen of Michael B. Cohen, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney Genera l, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Perry Joseph appeals the denial of his amended rule 3.850 motion. The trial court denied the amended motion for lack of jurisdiction because appellant had filed an appeal of the denial of his prior postconvi ction challenge. The trial court should not have denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Jackman v. State , 88 So. 3d 325, 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) . On remand, the trial court is free to consider whether the amended

rule 3.850 motion is meritoriou s as well as whether the amended motion is procedurally barred and may be dismissed as successive or untimely.

Reverse d and remand ed

.

W ARNER
, T

AYLOR and C ONNER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Easy CD Yearbook, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Almaymoon Mawji, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operation of the Company.


                                      /s/ Almaymoon Mawji
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Almaymoon Mawji
                                      Principal Financial Officer
                                      April 6, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERRY KERR; DENNIS KERR, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-36026 

D.C. No. 4:18-cv-00146-DCN 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2019**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit 

Judges.

Terry Kerr and Dennis Kerr appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Cervantes v. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 30 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-36026 

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Kerrs’ action because the Kerrs 

failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim for relief. See Hebbe v. 

Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are 

liberally construed, a plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to state a plausible 

claim); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (“A claim has facial 

plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw 

the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.”).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court. See 

United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not 

presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. NEGII DONSONTO COFFEE III, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 686 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 10th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ KI NAMKI NAMChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32






<PAGE>


                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Annual Report of Energas Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), George G. Shaw, the Chief
Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  June 15, 2007
                                 By: /s/ George G. Shaw
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     George G. Shaw, Chief  Executive and
                                     Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wi-Max Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Frank R. Ventura, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   
 Date:
November 22, 2010
 
 
 By: /s/ Frank R.
Ventura
 Frank R. Ventura
 Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 21.1.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


WHOLLY-OWNED

927563 Ontario Inc.
927564 Ontario Inc.
Med-Emerg Inc.
Med Plus Health Centres Ltd.
Med-Emerg Urgent Care Centres Inc.
Med-Emerg Family Health Centres Inc.
Med-Emerg Elmvale Clinic Inc.
YFMC Healthcare Inc.
1185943 Ontario Inc.
YFMC Healthcare (Alberta) Inc.
1024528 Ontario Ltd.
1180668 Ontario Inc.
1292363 Ontario Corp.

75%-OWNED

Doctors on Call Ltd.

51%-OWNED

Caremedics (Elmvale) Inc.
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Amico Games Corp. for the period ended May 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Amico Games Corp. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  July 14, 2011 |                                                               |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |                                                               |
|                            |                                                               |
|                            | /s/ Peter Liu                                                      |   |   |
|                            | Peter Liu                                                          |
|                            | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
|                            | AMICO GAMES CORP.                                                  |
Exhibit 31.1  Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 302)  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Steve Bergstrom, certify that:  (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silver Hill Mines, Inc., (Registrant).  (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  (4) The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  (5) The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information ; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Dated: August 18, 2008By: /s/ Steve BergstromSteve BergstromTitle: President, CEO
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 23

- 00078

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 2

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1667640D

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### A PRYL 

### B ETH 

### C ALLISON



### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

A ppellant has moved to dismiss her appeal. Because we have not yet decided

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a),

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: June 1, 2023
NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 447

- CV


### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ EB INTERNATIONAL, LLC, AND HIDALGO LOGISITICS, LLC, D/B/A HIDALGO COLD STORAGE, A TEXAS LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY , A ppellants ,

v.
JENROB INVESTMENTS, LP, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 3 32nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

### ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria Order Per Curiam2 On, October 11, 2013, appellant s , EB International, LLC, and Hidalgo Logistics,
LLC, d/b/a Hidalgo Cold Storage, a Texas Limited Liability Company, filed a suggestion of
bankruptcy in this appeal. According to the notice, appell ant Hidalgo Logistics, LLC filed
a bankruptcy petition on May 15, 2013 , in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division.
Upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, an automatic stay becomes effective which
prohibits the commencement or continuation of any judicial action or proceeding against
the debtor and any property within the debtor's bankruptcy estate. See 11 U.S.C.A. §
362(a). Pursuant to Rule 8.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal is
suspended. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2.
Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED until further order of this Court. Any
documents filed subsequent to the bankruptcy petition will remain pending until the
appeal is reinstated. The parties are directed to take such action as is appropriate to

advise t he Court of any change in the status of the bankruptcy proceeding which would
affect the status of this appeal, including but not limited to, the filing of a motion to
reinstate pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3. See id. 8.3.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 28 th day of October , 20 13

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6726

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DWAYNE MITCHELL LITTLEJOHN, a/k/a Manson,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (2:08-cr-00036-MR-WCM-2;

1:22-cv-00090-MR)

Submitted: November 15, 2022 Decided: January 4, 2023

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Mitchell Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6726 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/04/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Mitchell Littlejohn, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order 

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Having reviewed the record, we are 

satisfied that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition based on 

Littlejohn’s failure to establish a valid reason for his delay in seeking relief. See United 

States v. Lesane, 40 F.4th 191, 196-97 (4th Cir. 2022) (stating standard of review and 

explaining requirements for coram nobis relief). Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny 

Littlejohn’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6726 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/04/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 12


                      ROSE HILLS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    (millions of dollars except for ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Year            Year          Year
                                              ended           ended         ended
                                             December        December      December
                                             31, 1999        31, 1998      31, 1997
                                             --------        --------      --------
<S>                                         <C>             <C>           <C>
Earnings:
Income:(loss) before income taxes........         7.3             3.0          (1.7)
Add: fixed charges, net..................        15.9            16.5          16.5
                                                 ----            ----          ----
  Income (loss) before income taxes and
    fixed charges, net...................        23.2             19.5         14.8
Fixed charges: Total interest expense....        15.9             16.5         16.5
    Total fixed charges..................        15.9             16.5         16.5
                                                 ----             ----         ----
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.......        1.46             1.18          .90
                                                 ----             ----         ----
Coverage deficiency.....................          --               --          1.7
                                                 ====             ====         ====
</TABLE>
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 26 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-145531) and Amendment No. 313 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP












Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


December 23, 2015