alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CurrencySharesSMRussian Ruble Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin Farragher, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: March 17, 2009



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Kevin Farragher          
|Kevin Farragher*             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Kevin Farragher is signing in his
capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Howard Root, certify that:    1.
     I have reviewed this amendment to the 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Vascular Solutions, Inc.; and2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
     Date:  May 14, 2010
     By:
     /s/ Howard RootHoward RootChief Executive Officer


---
#### In the Matter of the Application of C. W. Sprinkle *et al.*

(No. 9051)

Submitted October 8, 1940.

Decided November 19, 1940.

*Wysohg & Wysong,*for plaintiffs in error.

Hatcher, Judge:

Petitioners own two tracts of land in Webster County, containing 7,342.74 acres and 214.5 acres respectively. For a number of years' prior to 1939, both tracts had been assessed for taxation at $6.00' per acre. That year the assessor raised the assessment of the larger tract to $10.00 per acre, and of the smaller tract to $15.00 per acre. The land owners protested these assessments before the board of equalization and review, and evidence was taken. The board approved the assessments. An appeal was granted by the circuit court, which sustained the assessment of the larger tract and reduced that of the smaller to $10.00 per acre. A writ of error was granted here.

*612Petitioners proved that the tracts were unimproved, rugged mountain lands, containing only a negligible acreage suitable for farming; that all the merchantable timber, 12 inches and up in diameter, had been removed from the tracts prior to 1930; that their surface had been extensively prospected for coal, but none merchantable was discovered; that the tracts were not on or near a railroad; that purchasers had been sought for them, diligently, in vain; and that entire equality of assessments did not prevail in the region where the tracts were located. For the state, county and district it appeared that this region, generally, contained valuable coal seams, some of which had been opened on lands not remote from these tracts; that geologists regarded them as having these seams; that the tracts had not been core-drilled, and until so, their barrenness was not established; that wild mountain lands, such as these tracts, having no workable coal, were generally assessed at $5.00 per acre; that if they had workable coal, and were not on or near a railroad, they were generally assessed at $10.00 per acre; and that the assessor was attempting to achieve equality of assessments in this region.

For purposes of comparison, both as to coal seams and to tax assessments, a number of lands in the general region of these tracts are referred to in the evidence. A map is filed which, to a limited extent, illustrates the evidence. Nevertheless, it is difficult for us to understand fully the probative value of the comparisons. Without such comprehension, we cannot say in the face of the substantial evidence supporting the circuit court, that its order is plainly wrong. See *Liberty Coal Co.*v. *Bassett,*108 W. Va. 293, 150 S. E. 745; *West Penn Power Co.*v. *Board,*112 W. Va. 442, 164 S. E. 862.

The order is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 4.10




June 1, 2009
402 Amendment of Criteria
S1/251690




FIRST INTERNATIONAL





June 1, 2009


BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd.


Dear Sir/Madam:





RE:           Undertaking to Fulfill Financial Criteria





Whereas your company benefits from a variety of credits and banking services (hereinafter: “the Credit”) granted thereto by the First International Bank of Israel Ltd. (hereinafter: “the Bank”), relying, inter alia, on your signing a letter of undertaking on September 23, 2008 to fulfill the financial criteria and additional conditions (hereinafter: “the Letter of Undertaking”).





And whereas your financial statements published on May 31, 2009 indicate the failure to fulfill the undertaking specified in section 4A of the Letter of Undertaking, which determines that the cumulative total of the EBITDA in accordance with the quarterly and annual consolidated financial statements of the company in the last four calendar quarters shall be no less than $5 million.





And whereas in such circumstances the Bank has the right to present the credit for payment forthwith;





And whereas you have requested that the Bank not exercise this right;





Accordingly, pursuant to your request, we hereby inform you that the Bank is prepared to introduce an amendment into section 4A of the Letter of Undertaking, which deals with the EBITDA, as follows:




The section shall be deleted and shall be replaced with the following section:




“The EBITDA (US GAAP) that has accrued for the last four quarters commencing on June 30, 2009 shall be no less than the sum of $5,000,000. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, a loss of up to $700,000 in a quarter in respect of the accounting record of the value of the benefit embodied in granting options to employees in accordance with FAS123 shall not constitute a violation of the criteria.”





“EBITDA” – This is defined as the operating profit plus the depreciation and deduction sections included in expenses deducted up to the operating report.





The agreement of the Bank, as aforesaid, does not constitute any amendment of the Letter of Undertaking, save with respect to section 4A, and all the remaining conditions thereof shall remain in effect. In addition, the agreement of the Bank shall not infringe on or derogate from the rights of the Bank vis-à-vis your company in accordance with any document and/or pursuant to any law.





This letter shall enter into effect on receipt of your confirmation and your undertaking in the margins of this letter and on payment of the amount of NIS 7,500 in respect of the issuing thereof, until June 14, 2009.




[Stamps and Signatures:
Andrea Arov

Stern Merav]

The First International Bank of Israel Ltd.

Herzliyah Pituach Branch




We hereby authorize receipt of the letter, we agree to the contents thereof and we shall act accordingly.


[Signature]


_____________________________


BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd.




[Illegible]


[Illegible]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00207-CR

Israel Montoya Martinez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. CR2017-675, THE HONORABLE JOHN F. PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due February 6, 2023. Counsel for appellant has filed a 

motion to withdraw as counsel because her change in employment requires her to withdraw. We 

grant the motion to withdraw, abate the appeal, and remand the case to the trial court to appoint

substituted counsel to represent appellant on appeal. Further, the trial court shall order the 

appropriate supplemental clerk’s record to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than 

March 8, 2023.

It is so ordered February 24, 2023.
2

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Abated and Remanded

Filed: February 24, 2023

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Spinnet Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2009 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: August 5, 2008
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of Kinetek, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m (a)) and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:   November 2, 2005

 

/s/ Daniel D. Drury                         Daniel D. DruryChief Financial Officer
| 1. | Party A is a public company trading on OTC BB; |
|----|------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Party B is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Board of Directors of Party A; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Party B is the legal representative of Party C; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | Party B is the legal representative of Party D; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | Party B, Party C and Party D provide funds to Party A in the form of related party loans. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Party A: Universal Solar Technology, Inc.                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Wensheng Chen                                           |
|                                                        |
| Party B: Wensheng Chen                                      |
| /s/ Wensheng Chen                                           |
|                                                        |
| Party C: Zhuhai Yuemao Laser Facility Engineering Co., Ltd. |
| /s/ Wensheng Chen                                           |
|                                                        |
| Party D: Yuemao Science & Technology Group              |
| /s/ Wensheng Chen                                           |

----
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 50061 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Anthony Hubert,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:22
- CR
- 143 - 1

**_______________________ _______**  Before **Elrod, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Hubert has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hubert has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re levant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 6, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50061 Document: 00516885776 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023No. 23
- 50061

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further resp onsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-50061 Document: 00516885776 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2023
3 SERVICg,
cal Se,

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

s %
= 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46
Pa Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
% (513) 533-6825
%

October 26, 2007

CHAIRMAN:

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.
Lafayette, Indiana a "
The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt

Secretary of Health and Human Services

MEMBERS: Department of Health and Human Services
Seale Beach 200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Richland, Washington Washington, DC 20201
Bradley P. Clawson
Rexburg, Idaho Dear Mr. Secretary:
Michael H. Gibson . =
Franklin, Ohio The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has
Mark A. Griffon evaluated SEC Petition-00039 concerning all statisticians who
Salem, New Hampshire performed statistical analysis of biological experiments (working
James E. Lockey, M.D. within the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Biological Sciences
Cincinnati, Ohio Division) in all locations at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
James M. Melius, M.D., Ph.D. who were employed by DOE or its contractors between January 1,
Albany, New York 1958 and June 30, 1958. NIOSH has recommended that these workers
Wanda i. Munn not be added to the special exposure cohort. NIOSH has access to
Richland, Washington adequate exposure monitoring and other information necessary to do
John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. individual dose reconstructions with sufficient accuracy for members
College Station, Texas of this group. The Board concurs with this determination.
Robert W. Presley . . . .
Clinton, Tennessee Enclosed is supporting documentation from the recent Advisory Board
Canaiiaiie &. Rewiatar, PHD. Meeting held in Naperville, Illinois where this potential class for the
Elysian, Minnesota special exposure cohort was discussed. If any of these items are
Phillip Schofield unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.
Bosque Farm, New Mexico
Sincerely, s
wee A a AL eee
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY: Paul L. Zierfer, Ph.D.
Lewis V. Wade, Ph.D Chairman
Washington, DC
COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT :
LaShawn D. Shields Ene.

Atlanta, Georgia

10% V Z- AON LOO
GO-HSOIN G3AI993u
Form N-SAR,
Sub-Item 77Q1(a)
Copies of any material
amendments
to the registrant's charter
Nuveen Senior Income Fund -
333-80867, 811-06383


On May 26, 2000, under Conformed
Submission
Type 497, accession number,
0000950137-00-002595,
a copy of the Statement Establishing
and Fixing
the Rights and Preferences of
Taxable Auctioned
Preferred Shares, considered to be
an
amendment to the Declaration of
Trust of
the above-referenced fund, was filed
with
the SEC and is herein incorporated
by reference
as an exhibit to the Sub-Item 77Q1(a)
of Form N-SAR.
See <PAGES> 94 - 128 of the
filing.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of the Powerdyne International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:





The Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the  Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Dale EugaPresident, Director,Chief Executive Officer


Date: December 23, 2011
RICHARD DOSS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3927

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 6, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

Richard Doss, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>   1
                   [LETTERHEAD OF MILLER, ENGLAND & COMPANY]

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-51927 of HCB Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated September 5,
1997, (February 3, 1999, as to the effect of the restatement described in Note
1) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HCB Bancshares, Inc. for
the year ended June 30, 1998.

/s/ MILLER, ENGLAND & COMPANY

Little Rock, Arkansas
February 25, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                  State or
                              Jurisidiction of
                               Incorporation            Names Under Which
Name of Subsidiary            or Organization        Subsidiary Does Business
----------------------------  ----------------  ----------------------------------
<S>                           <C>               <C>

WinCup Holdings, Inc.(1)      Delaware          WinCup Holdings, Inc.
                                                WinCup Holdings of Texas, Inc.
                                                WinCup

Radnor Chemical               Delaware          Radnor Chemical Corporation
Corporation (1)

StyroChem Canada, Ltd.(2)     Quebec            StyroChem Canada, Ltd.
                                                StyroChem International

StyroChem U.S., Ltd.(3)       Texas             StyroChem U.S., Ltd.
                                                StyroChem International

WinCup Texas, Ltd.(4)         Texas             WinCup Texas, Ltd.
                                                WinCup

StyroChem GP, L.L.C.(2)       Delaware          StyroChem GP, L.L.C.

StyroChem LP, L.L.C.(2)       Delaware          StyroChem LP, L.L.C

WinCup GP, L.L.C.(5)          Delaware          WinCup GP, L.L.C.

WinCup LP, L.L.C.(5)          Delaware          WinCup LP, L.L.C

Radnor Management, Inc.(1)    Delaware          Radnor Management, Inc.

StyroChem Europe (The         The Netherlands   StyroChem Europe (The Netherlands)
Netherlands) B.V.(2)                            B.V.

StyroChem Finland Oy(6)       Finland           StyroChem Finland Oy
                                                StyroChem International

ThermiSol Denmark ApS(6)      Denmark           ThermiSol Denmark ApS

ThermiSol Finland Oy(6)       Finland           ThermiSol Finland Oy

ThermiSol Sweden AB(6)        Sweden            ThermiSol Sweden AB

Radnor Delaware, Inc.(5)      Delaware          Radnor Delaware, Inc.
</TABLE>

------------------
(1)      Owned 100% by Radnor Holdings Corporation.
(2)      Owned 100% by Radnor Chemical Corporation.
(3)      Owned 99% by StyroChem LP, L.L.C. and 1% by StyroChem GP, L.L.C.
(4)      Owned 99% by WinCup LP, L.L.C. and 1% by WinCup GP, L.L.C.
(5)      Owned 100% by WinCup Holdings, Inc.
(6)      Owned 100% by StyroChem Europe (The Netherlands) B.V.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS                              Exhibit 23




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-58297, 333-02965 and 333-10585) and Form
S-8 (File Nos. 2-79612, 33-37261, 33-69596, 33-69598, 33-61558, 33-79443,
333-08994, 333-42635, 333-89971, 333-90347, 333-36146, 333-36150 and 333-46382)
of Southern Union Company and Subsidiaries of our report dated August 23, 2000,
except for Notes III, XII and XV as to which the date is September 28, 2000 and
Note II, as to which the date is April 9, 2001, relating to the
consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




                                                  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Austin, Texas
April 25, 2001
Exhibit 21
                           METRIKA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

      As of February 23, 2000, Metrika Systems Corporation owned the following
companies:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                <C>                       <C>
                               NAME                                STATE OR JURISDICTION     PERCENT OF
                                                                      OF INCORPORATION       OWNERSHIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gamma-Metrics Minerals Pty Ltd.                                       South Australia           100
Radiometrie RM GmbH                                                       Germany               100
Radiometrie S.A.                                                           France               100
Gamma-Metrics                                                            California             100
MF Physics Corporation                                                    Delaware              100
Radiometrie Corporation                                                   Delaware              100
  DMC Mess & Regeltechnik GmbH                                            Germany               100
Radiometrie U.S.A., Inc.                                                 California             100
Radiometrie Limited                                                       England               100
</TABLE>