alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 National Institute for Occupational

 Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

Phone: 877-222-7570 

Fax: 513-533-6826 

May 7, 2010 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00156 

Ms. Rachel Leiton 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Room C-4511 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from Area IV of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory as an addition to the Special 

Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000. On April 5, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS 

designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their 

contractors and subcontractors who worked in any area of Area IV of the Santa 

Susana Field Laboratory from January 1, 1959 through December 31, 1964, for a 

number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely 

under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters 

established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special 

Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on May 5, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384l(14)(C). 

Hence, beginning on May 5, 2010, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this 

notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director 

 Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen Replin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of Monet
Entertainment Group Ltd.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 2, 2005

Stephen D. Replin
-----------------
Stephen D. Replin
President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 171 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 172 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 173 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 174 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[171 EAL 2023, 172 EAL 2023, 173 EAL 2023, 174 EAL 2023, 175 EAL 2023, 176 EAL 

2023, 177 EAL 2023, 178 EAL 2023 and 179 EAL 2023] - 2

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 175 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 176 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 177 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

No. 178 EAL 2023
[171 EAL 2023, 172 EAL 2023, 173 EAL 2023, 174 EAL 2023, 175 EAL 2023, 176 EAL 

2023, 177 EAL 2023, 178 EAL 2023 and 179 EAL 2023] - 3

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 179 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
---

Exhibit 99.8



CERTIFICATION





I, Henry A. John, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Minera Andes Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c.

evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and;



d.

disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 30, 2009

By:/s/ Henry A. John

Henry A. John

Chief Financial Officer



---
Exhibit
99.4
 
 
 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Imperial
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Josey
Sajan, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
 
 
 Date:
November 12, 2008
 
 
 JOSEY
SAJAN
 
 Josey
Sajan
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 
 
 -1-
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.1


Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program 


Effective May 11, 2015, the following compensation program applies to non-employee directors of DST Systems, Inc. (the “Company”).   


	
		
	Compensable Event/Position
	Fees

	Annual Cash Retainer
	$90,000

	Retainer for Lead Independent Director
	$30,000

	Committee Chairperson Retainer
	 

	      Audit
	$20,000

	      Compensation
	$15,000

	      Nominating
	$15,000

	Board Meeting Fee
	(1)

	Committee Meeting Fee
	(1)

	Annual Equity Award
	$140,000 (fair market value of DST stock) (2)






(1) for each meeting (whether in-person or telephonic) in excess of 7 meetings of the Board or applicable committee  in the one-year measurement a director will receive $2000 per meeting. 
(2) Grants of DST stock are made pursuant to the 2015 Equity and Incentive Plan and are paid as soon as practicable following the date of the annual meeting if the non‐employee director will continue to serve immediately following such meeting. The number of shares is based on the fair market value (as determined under rules of Compensation Committee) on the date of grant.
Directors Deferred Fee Plan
The Directors Deferred Fee Plan provides Directors with the opportunity to (i) receive Deferred Shares in lieu of (x) their annual cash Directors' fees (other than Meeting Fees) and (y) their Directors' annual equity awards and (ii) defer recognition of income tax until the settlement and payment of Deferred Shares upon the Director's Separation from Service from the Board.  


Insurance
DST purchases term life insurance for non‐employee directors. The directors name the policy beneficiaries. 
Spousal Travel
DST provides spousal travel to occasional off‐ site planning meetings and reimburses family entertainment at such meetings. If we do not incur an incremental cost for an additional passenger, the spouse or significant other of a director may accompany the director to the location at which meetings of the Board or its committees are occurring by traveling on aircraft in which we have an interest.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 25, 2018

No. 04-17-00058-CR

David Alexander ZUNIGA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4390B

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and the appeal is ABATED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for 

appointment of new counsel to represent appellant on appeal.

The trial court clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order 

appointing new appellate counsel within thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on July 25, 2018.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of July, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



     As  independent  public  accountants,  we hereby  consent to the use of our
report on  Pioneer  Tax-Free  Income  Fund  dated  February  2, 1998 (and to all
references to our firm) included in or made a part of  Post-Effective  Amendment
No. 37 and  Amendment  No. 29 to  Registration  Statement  File No.  2-57653 and
811-07597, respectively.




                                        /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
April 27, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xun Energy Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:   October 12, 2012



By: /s/ Jerry G. Mikolajczyk

Jerry G. Mikolajczyk,

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)
**Exhibit 99.23**

 

**CONSENT OF RICHARD JEMIELITA**

 

I hereby consent to the use of my name and the name of my company in connection with the following, which are being reference in the annual report on Form 40-F of Minera Andes Inc. (the “**Company**”) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

1.               The technical report titled “Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report Updated Preliminary Assessment Los Azules Project”, with an effective date of December 1, 2010 (the “**Los Azules Report**”);

 

2.               The current mineral resource estimates of the Los Azules project; and

 

3.               The annual information form of the Company dated March 28th, 2011, which includes reference to my name and company name in connection with information relating to the Los Azules Project and the Los Azules Report.

 
| Date: March 30th, 2011 |                                          |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                          |
|                        | “Signed” Richard A.   Jemielita     |
|                        | Name: Richard A.   Jemielita, PhD, MIMMM |
|                        | Title:Independent Consulting Geologist        |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of KRYPTIC  ENTERTAINMENT  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2008,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John
Lagourgue,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ John Lagourgue
                                  ----------------------------------------------
Date: July 23, 2008               John Lagourgue
                                  President, CEO and principal executive officer
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                      CONTINENTAL AIRLINES FINANCE TRUST II


         This Certificate of Trust is being executed as of November 6, 2000 for
the purpose of creating a business trust pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust
Act, 12 Del. C.ss.ss. 3801 et seq. (the "Act").

         The undersigned hereby certify as follows:

         1. Name: The name of the business trust is Continental Airlines Finance
Trust II (the "Trust").

         2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the Delaware
resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the
Act are as follows:

            Wilmington Trust Company
            Rodney Square North
            1100 North Market Street
            Wilmington, Delaware 19890

         3. Effective. The Certificate of Trust shall be effective immediately
upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

         4. Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or
more counterparts.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees
of the Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the day and
year first above written.

                                          WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                          as Delaware Trustee



                                          By: /s/ W. Chris Sponenberg
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: W. Chris Sponenberg
                                              Title: Assistant Vice President

                                          /s/ Lawrence W. Kellner
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Lawrence W. Kellner, as Trustee


                                          /s/ Jeffrey A. Smisek
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Jeffrey A. Smisek, as Trustee
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40503

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE LUIS MIRELES-FLORES

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:07-CR-81-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Luis Mireles-Flores appeals his conviction and sentence for being

present in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Mireles-Flores argues that the district court erred in applying a 16-level

enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii), based on the

determination that his 2006 Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation

constitutes a crime of violence. We review the district court’s application of the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 14, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40503

2

Sentencing Guidelines de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. United

States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 202, 203 n.9 (5th Cir. 2005); United States

v. Vargas-Duran, 356 F.3d 598, 602 (5th Cir. 2004) (en banc).

Mireles-Flores recognizes that this court has previously held that an

offense committed under TEX. PENAL CODE § 30.02(a)(1), the statute of his

conviction, is a crime of violence for purposes of § 2L1.2, but he argues that the

Supreme Court’s recent decision in James v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 1586,

1599-1600 (2007), overrules this circuit’s precedent. In United States v. GomezGuerra, 485 F.3d 301, 303 n.1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 128 S.Ct. 156 (2007), this

court noted that the analysis in James expressly does not concern enumerated

offenses and pertains only to a residual provision in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i),

which § 2L1.2 does not contain. Consequently, James is not dispositive of this

case. Moreover, because this court has held that an offense under § 30.02(a)(1)

constitutes a crime of violence for purposes of § 2L1.2, the district court did not

err in applying the enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). See United States

v. Garcia-Mendez, 420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied. 126 S.Ct.

1398 (2006).

In light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Mireles-Flores

challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and

aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the

offense that must be found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441

(Jan. 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.