alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31(b) - RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION (CFO)

I, Marshall Chadwell, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Monarch Services,
    Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
        supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
        registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
        to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
        period in which this annual report is being prepared;

    b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
        the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
        and

    c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
        most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
        reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors, (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  December 15, 2004

/s/    MARSHALL CHADWELL
------------------------
Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

 

**Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of  Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code****, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

In connection with the annual report of ARC Resources Ltd. (“ARC”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Dielwart, President and Chief Executive Officer of ARC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ARC.

 

 
| signed   *“John P. Dielwart”* |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
| Name:   John P. Dielwart                |   |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer    |   |
|                                    |   |
| March 28,   2011                   |   |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 83 (Friday, April 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22774-22775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10059]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD10-1-010]

Review of Cost Submittals by Other Federal Agencies for 
Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act; Notice Requesting 
Questions and Comments on Other Federal Agency Cost Submissions for 
Fiscal Year 2009

April 22, 2010.
    In its Order On Rehearing Consolidating Administrative Annual 
Charges Bill Appeals And Modifying Annual Charges Billing Procedures, 
109 FERC ] 61,040 (2004) (October 8 Order), the Commission set forth an 
annual process for Other Federal Agencies (OFAs) to submit their costs 
related to Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act. Pursuant to 
the established process, the Director of the Financial Services 
Division, Office of the Executive Director, on October 22, 2009, issued 
a letter requesting the OFAs to submit their costs by January 21, 2010 
using the OFA Cost Submission Form.
    Upon receipt of the agency submissions, the Commission posted the 
information in eLibrary, and issued, on March 11, 2010, a notice 
announcing the date for a technical conference to review the submitted 
costs. On April 14, 2010, the Commission held the technical conference. 
Technical conference transcripts, submitted cost forms, and detailed 
supporting documents are all available for review under Docket No. 
AD10-1 on the Commission's eLibrary and are accessible on-line at 
http://www.ferc.gov, using the ``eLibrary'' link and are available for 
review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. 
There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables 
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to 
a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, 
please e-mail [email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll 
free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Those interested may file specific questions and comments on the FY 
2009 OFA cost submissions with the Commission under Docket No. AD10-1-
010, no later than May 7, 2010. Once filed, the Commission will forward 
the

[[Page 22775]]

questions and comments to the OFAs for response.
    Anyone with questions pertaining to the technical conference or 
this notice should contact W. Doug Foster at (202) 502-6118 (via e-mail 
at [email protected]), or Fannie Kingsberry at (202) 502-6108 (via 
e-mail at [email protected]).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10059 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

D’RAYFIELD KARY-KHAME SHIPMAN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER 

CORPORATION (AMTRAK), 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 14-384 (CKK)

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

(March 17, 2017) 

Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 72.2 and 72.3, this Court referred this matter to Magistrate 

Judge Deborah A. Robinson for full case management up to but excluding trial, and a report and 

recommendation on any dispositive motion filed by any party. ECF No. 100. On January 31, 2017, 

Judge Robinson’s [122] Report and Recommendation was entered on Defendant’s [104] Motion 

for Summary Judgment, and the parties were allowed 14 days to file objections to the 

recommendations made by Judge Robinson. The parties were expressly instructed that the 

“objections shall specifically identify the portions of the findings and recommendations to which 

objection is made and the basis of each objection.” ECF No. 122 at 13. Plaintiff timely filed 

objections to the Report and Recommendation on February 13, 2017. ECF No. 123. Defendant 

opposed those objections, ECF No. 125, and Plaintiff has filed a reply, ECF No. 126. 

“Any party may file . . . written objections to the magistrate judge’s proposed findings and 

recommendations,” and must “specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings and 

recommendations to which objection is made and the basis for the objection.” LCvR 72.3(b). Upon 

the filing of objections, the “district judge [must] make a de novo determination of those portions 

of a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations to which objection is made,” and may do 

so “based solely on the record developed before the magistrate judge, or may conduct a new 

hearing, receive further evidence, and recall witnesses.” LCvR 72.3(c). The “district judge may 

accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations of the magistrate 

judge, or may recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Id. 

Plaintiff’s objections are not directed at any specific portion of the Report and 

Recommendation. Rather, Plaintiff relays his generalized concerns regarding racism and other 

injustices in the United States, and the federal court system more specifically. Although the Court 

in no way seeks to minimize those concerns, they are not pertinent as a legal matter to the 

resolution of Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Defendant. Accordingly, upon careful consideration of the 

record in this case and of Magistrate Judge Robinson’s well-reasoned and thorough Report and 
2 

Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the [122] Report and Recommendation in 

full, and therefore GRANTS Defendant’s [104] Motion for Summary Judgment. 

An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

Dated: March 17, 2017

 /s/

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Judge
**Exhibit 99.17**

 

**CONSENT OF DAVID BURGA**

 

I hereby consent to the use of my name and the name of my company in connection with the following, which are being reference in the annual report on Form 40-F of Minera Andes Inc. (the “**Company**”) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

1.               The technical report dated December 22, 2010 entitled “Technical Report on the San José Silver-Gold Mine, Santa Cruz, Argentina” (the “**San José Report**”);

 

2.               The current mineral resource and reserve estimates of the San José Silver-Gold Mine; and

 

3.               The annual information form of the Company dated March 28th, 2011, which includes reference to my name and company name in connection with information relating to the San José Report and the San José Silver-Gold Mine.

 
| Date: March 30th, 2011 |                              |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                        | “Signed” David Burga    |
|                        | David Burga, PGeo                 |
|                        | Geological   Consultant           |
|                        | P&E Mining   Consultants Inc. |

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
<PAGE>   2

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Vaxcel, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 1998, included in the 1997
Annual Report to Shareholders of Vaxcel, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Vaxcel, Inc. listed
in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
as of the date of our report referred to in the preceding paragraph, the
financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 No. 333-31733 pertaining to the Vaxcel, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan
and the Vaxcel, Inc. Replacement Plan for Zynaxis Options, of our report dated
February 27, 1998, with respect to the financial statements incorporated herein
by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect
to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Vaxcel, Inc.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 20, 1998
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 41 (Friday, February 29, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11002-11003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-876]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-0165; Airspace Docket No. 07-AEA-11]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Montrose, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
that establishes a Class E airspace area to support Area Navigation 
(RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS) special Instrument Approach 
Procedures (IAPs) that serve the Montrose High School Heliport, 
Montrose, PA.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 14, 2008. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual 
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daryl Daniels, Airspace Specialist, 
System Support, AJO2-E2B.12, FAA Eastern Service Center, 1701 Columbia 
Ave., College Park, GA 30337; telephone (404) 305-5581; fax (404) 305-
5572.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on December 13, 2007 (72 FR 70768). 
The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non 
controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse 
public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no 
adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such

[[Page 11003]]

an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on February 14, 2008. No adverse 
comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that effective 
date.

    Issued in College Park, GA, on February 7, 2008.
John D. Haley,
Acting Manager, System Support Group, Eastern Service Center.
[FR Doc. 08-876 Filed 2-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
Status of Upcoming SEC Petiti

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

December 2012

Knoxville, TN
Purpose

 Provide an update to the Advisory Board on 

current number of qualified petitions under

evaluation and sites being evaluated throug

83.14 process

 Provide SEC information to the Advisory Boa

support of its preparations for future Work G

sessions and Advisory Board meetings
SEC Summary Table

(as of November 28, 2012)

 Petitions received  Petitions in qualification process  Petitions qualified for evaluation 

• NIOSH evaluation in progress 0

• NIOSH evaluation completed 128

– SEC Evaluation Reports

with the Advisory Board

for recommendation 10

 Petitions not qualifying for evaluation Note: Petitions not qualifying include five petitions received prio

rule becoming final and Petition 34 where the site was de‐
SEC Petition Evaluations Presen

this Board Meeting

 Battelle Laboratories – King Avenue (83.14)

 Savannah River Site Evaluation Report Adde

(83.13)

 Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Company 

 Baker Brothers (83.13)
SEC Petition Currently under Adv

Board Review

 Petition Evaluations the Advisory Board has 

action on, but are under continued evaluatio

• Fernald• Hanford• Pantex• Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)

 Petition Evaluations with the Advisory Board 

initial action:

• General Steel Industries (GSI)

• Rocky Flats Plant
Potential SEC Petitions (83.1

 Sandia National Lab – Albuquerque (1945‐19

 General Atomics (modify existing class defin

 Dayton Project Monsanto (modify based on 

in facility designation)

• Modify based on change in facility designation t

Department of Energy (DOE) facility

• Modify to add the 9 month period when operati

being shifted from “The Dayton Project” to Mou
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Francis A. Rebello, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review
of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of H & H Imports, Inc. for the quarter
ended May 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-Q"), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of H & H
Imports, Inc. for the period covered by the Form 10-Q.


Date: July 7, 2008                      By: /s/ Francis A. Rebello
                                        --------------------------
                                        Francis A. Rebello, President
                                        (Principal Executive and
                                        Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Value Estates, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  April 14, 2010                  By: /s/ Dennis T. Kushner

Dennis T. Kushner

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>


                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Annual Report of Energas Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), George G. Shaw, the Chief
Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  May 12, 2006
                            By:  /s/ George G. Shaw
                                -------------------------------------
                                George G. Shaw, Chief  Executive and Principal
                                Financial Officer
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed December 30, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 01502

- CV
CORTEZ MILLS AND CAM ILLE CARROLL , Appellants V. TEXAS VASCULAR ASSOCIATES, PA , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 04630

- D



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang

- Miers, and Myers Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers Before the Court is a l etter from appellee signed by counsel for all parties. We treat this letter as an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. In their motion, the parties state that they have reached an agreement. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion and dismiss the appe al. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).

141502F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

CORTEZ MILLS AND CAMILLE CARROLL, Appellants

No. 05

- 14

- 01502

- CV V.

TEXAS VASCULAR ASSOCIATES, PA, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 04630

- D. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers. Justices Bridges and Myers, participating.

In accordance with t his Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellee TEXAS VASCULAR ASSOCIATES, PA recover its costs of this appeal from appellants CORTEZ MILLS AND CAMILLE CARROLL.

Judgmen t entered this 30th day of December, 2014.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto Search Cars, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jonathan J. Martin, as Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
Report.






November
      13, 2009
                  
                  /s/
      Jonathan J. MartinDate
                  
                  Jonathan
      J. Martin
                    President,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer







7