SEC Petition Evaluation Report 

Petition SEC-00160 

Report Rev #: 0 Report Submittal Date: January 20, 2010

Subject Expert(s): Chris Miles 

Site Expert(s): N/A 

Petitioner Administrative Summary 

Petition Under Evaluation 

Petition # Petition 

Type 

Petition A 

Receipt Date DOE/AWE Facility Name 

SEC-00160 83.14 December 18, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) 

NIOSH-Proposed Class Definition 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors 

who worked at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, from August 13, 1942 

through December 31, 1961, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either 

solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or 

more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.

Related Petition Summary Information 

SEC Petition Tracking #(s) Petition Type DOE/AWE Facility Name Petition Status 

N/A N/A N/A N/A 

Related Evaluation Report Information 

Report Title DOE/AWE Facility Name 

N/A N/A

ORAU Lead Technical Evaluator: Chris Miles ORAU Peer Review Completed By: Michael Kubiak

Peer Review Completed By: [Signature on file] 1/20/2010 

Lara Hughes Date 

SEC Petition Evaluation Reviewed By: [Signature on file] 1/21/2010 

J. W. Neton Date 

SEC Evaluation Approved By: [Signature on file] 1/22/2010 

Stuart L Hinnefeld Date 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

2 of 56 

This page intentionally left blank 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

3 of 56 

Evaluation Report Summary: SEC-00160, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

This evaluation report by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 

addresses a class of employees proposed for addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) per the 

Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 

§ 7384 et seq. (EEOICPA) and 42 C.F.R. pt. 83, Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees 

as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000. 

NIOSH-Proposed Class Definition

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors and 

subcontractors who worked at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, 

from August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1961, for a number of work days aggregating at least 

250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days 

within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special 

Exposure Cohort. 

Feasibility of Dose Reconstruction Findings

NIOSH lacks sufficient information, which includes personnel monitoring, workplace monitoring, and 

source term data, to allow it to estimate with sufficient accuracy the level of radiation doses that could 

have been incurred by individual members of the proposed class. NIOSH’s feasibility findings 

include the following: 

Internal Dose Reconstruction Feasibility 

 Principal sources of internal radiation doses for members of the proposed class included exposures 

to uranium, transuranic elements, and various other radioactive materials. 

 Prior to 1962, internal dose monitoring data available to NIOSH are insufficient for purposes of 

dose reconstruction or for bounding internal doses. Consequently, NIOSH finds that it is not 

feasible to estimate with sufficient accuracy, or to bound, internal doses to members of the 

proposed class before 1962. By 1962, the internal dosimetry program at LBNL was fully 

operational and has remained so through the present day. Beginning in 1962, internal dosimetry 

data are available and sufficient to bound intakes. 

External Dose Reconstruction Feasibility 

 Principal sources of external radiation doses for members of the proposed class included 

exposures to uranium, numerous fission and activation products, cyclotrons, linear accelerators, 

and other radiation-generating devices. 

 Prior to 1948, external dosimetry data are unavailable to NIOSH. Consequently, NIOSH finds 

that it is not likely feasible to estimate with sufficient accuracy, or to bound, the total external 

doses to members of the proposed class prior to 1948. Beginning in 1948, external dosimetry data 

are available for some workers. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

4 of 56 

Medical Dose Reconstruction Feasibility 

 NIOSH finds that it is likely feasible to reconstruct occupational medical dose for LBNL workers 

with sufficient accuracy. 

Although NIOSH finds that it is not possible to completely reconstruct radiation doses for the 

proposed class, NIOSH intends to use any internal and external monitoring data that may become 

available (and that can be interpreted using existing NIOSH dose reconstruction processes or 

procedures) for an individual claim. Therefore, dose reconstructions for individuals employed at 

LBNL during the period from August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1961, but who do not qualify 

for inclusion in the SEC, may be performed using these data as appropriate. 

Health Endangerment Determination

The NIOSH evaluation did not identify any evidence supplied by the petitioners or from other 

resources that would establish that the class was exposed to radiation during a discrete incident likely 

to have involved exceptionally high-level exposures, such as nuclear criticality incidents or other 

events involving similarly high levels of exposures. However, the evidence reviewed in this 

evaluation indicates that some workers in the class may have accumulated chronic radiation exposures 

through intakes of various radionuclides and from direct exposure to radiation-producing equipment 

and radioactive materials. Therefore, 42 C.F.R. § 83.13(c)(3)(ii) requires NIOSH to specify that 

health may have been endangered for those workers covered by this evaluation who were employed 

for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days within the parameters established for 

this class or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other 

classes of employees in the SEC. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

5 of 56 

Table of Contents 

Evaluation Report Summary: SEC-00160, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory............................ 3

1.0 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................................... 7

2.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 7

3.0 NIOSH-Proposed Class Definition and Petition Basis................................................................ 8

4.0 Radiological Operations Relevant to the Proposed Class ........................................................... 8

4.1 Operations Description....................................................................................................... 8

4.2 Radiation Exposure Potential from Operations.................................................................. 9

4.3 Time Period Associated with Radiological Operations.................................................... 10

4.4 Site Locations Associated with Radiological Operations ................................................ 10

4.5 Job Descriptions Affected by Radiological Operations ................................................... 10

5.0 Summary of Available Monitoring Data for the Proposed Class.............................................. 10

5.1 Data Capture Efforts and Sources Reviewed ................................................................... 11

5.2 Worker Interviews............................................................................................................ 11

5.3 Internal Personnel Monitoring Data ................................................................................. 12

5.4 External Personnel Monitoring Data................................................................................ 12

5.5 Workplace Monitoring Data............................................................................................. 12

5.6 Radiological Source Term Data ....................................................................................... 13

6.0 Feasibility of Dose Reconstruction for the Proposed Class ...................................................... 13

6.1 Feasibility of Estimating Internal Exposures ................................................................... 14

6.2 Feasibility of Estimating External Exposures .................................................................. 15

6.3 Class Parameters Associated with Infeasibility................................................................ 16

7.0 Summary of Feasibility Findings for Petition SEC-00160........................................................ 16

8.0 Evaluation of Health Endangerment for Petition SEC-00160................................................... 17

9.0 NIOSH-Proposed Class for Petition SEC-00160 ...................................................................... 17

10.0 Evaluation of Second Similar Class .......................................................................................... 17

11.0 References ................................................................................................................................. 20

Attachment 1: Data Capture Synopsis................................................................................................... 24
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

6 of 56 

This page intentionally left blank 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

7 of 56 

SEC Petition Evaluation Report for SEC-00160

ATTRIBUTION AND ANNOTATION: This is a single-author document. All conclusions drawn from 

the data presented in this evaluation were made by the ORAU Team Lead Technical Evaluator: Chris 

Miles, Quantaflux, LLC. The rationales for all conclusions in this document are explained in the 

associated text. 

1.0 Purpose and Scope 

This report evaluates the feasibility of reconstructing doses for employees who worked at Lawrence 

Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) during a specified time. It provides information and analysis 

germane to considering a petition for adding a class of employees to the Congressionally-created 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC). 

This report does not make any determinations concerning the feasibility of dose reconstruction that 

necessarily apply to any individual energy employee who might require a dose reconstruction from 

NIOSH, with the exception of the employee whose dose reconstruction could not be completed, and 

whose claim consequently led to this petition evaluation. The finding in this report is not the final 

determination as to whether or not the proposed class will be added to the SEC. This report will be 

considered by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) and by the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services (HHS). The Secretary of HHS will make final decisions concerning 

whether or not to add one or more classes to the SEC in response to the petition addressed by this 

report. 

This evaluation, in which NIOSH provides its findings both on the feasibility of estimating radiation 

doses of members of this class with sufficient accuracy and on health endangerment, was conducted in 

accordance with the requirements of EEOICPA and 42 C.F.R. § 83.14. 

2.0 Introduction 

Both EEOICPA and 42 C.F.R. pt. 83 require NIOSH to evaluate qualified petitions requesting that the 

Department of Health and Human Services add a class of employees to the SEC. The evaluation is 

intended to provide a fair, science-based determination of whether it is feasible to estimate, with 

sufficient accuracy, the radiation doses of the proposed class of employees through NIOSH dose 

reconstructions.1

NIOSH is required to document its evaluation in a report, and to do so, relies upon both its own dose 

reconstruction expertise as well as technical support from its contractor, Oak Ridge Associated 

Universities (ORAU). Once completed, NIOSH provides the report to both the petitioners and the 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health. The Board will consider the NIOSH evaluation 

report, together with the petition, comments of the petitioner(s) and such other information as the 

Board considers appropriate, to make recommendations to the Secretary of HHS on whether or not to 

add one or more classes of employees to the SEC. Once NIOSH has received and considered the 

 

1

 NIOSH dose reconstructions under EEOICPA are performed using the methods promulgated under 42 C.F.R. pt. 82 and 

the detailed implementation guidelines available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

8 of 56 

 

advice of the Board, the Director of NIOSH will propose a decision on behalf of HHS. The Secretary 

of HHS will make the final decision, taking into account the NIOSH evaluation, the advice of the 

Board, and the proposed decision issued by NIOSH. As part of this final decision process, the 

petitioner(s) may seek a review of certain types of final decisions issued by the Secretary of HHS.2

3.0 NIOSH-Proposed Class Definition and Petition Basis 

The NIOSH-proposed class includes all employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor 

agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors who worked at the Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory in Berkeley, California, from August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1961, for a number 

of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in 

combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of 

employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort. During this period, employees at this facility 

were involved with research and development activities involving work with uranium, transuranic 

elements, and numerous other radioactive materials, as well as work with cyclotrons, linear 

accelerators, and other radiation-generating devices. 

The evaluation responds to Petition SEC-00160 which was submitted by an EEOICPA claimant 

whose dose reconstruction could not be completed by NIOSH due to a lack of sufficient dosimetryrelated information. NIOSH’s determination that it is unable to complete a dose reconstruction for an 

EEOICPA claimant is a qualified basis for submitting an SEC petition pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 

83.9(b). 

4.0 Radiological Operations Relevant to the Proposed Class 

The following subsections summarize the radiological operations at LBNL from August 13, 1942 

through December 31, 1961 and the information available to NIOSH to characterize particular 

processes and radioactive source materials. Using available sources, NIOSH has attempted to gather 

process and source descriptions, information regarding the identity and quantities of radionuclides of 

concern, and information describing processes through which the radiation exposures of concern may 

have occurred and the physical environment in which they may have occurred. The information 

included within this evaluation report is meant only to be a summary of the available information. 

4.1 Operations Description 

The first cyclotron at the University of California was a 4-inch cyclotron consisting of glass and red 

sealing wax made by E. O. Lawrence and N. E. Edlefsen in January 1930. Cyclotron research and 

development continued at the University for several decades thereafter. In 1937, the 37-inch 

cyclotron became operational. It was capable of accelerating deuterons to 8 MeV and alpha particles 

to 16 MeV. Shortly after the erection of the Crocker Laboratory in 1938, the 60-inch cyclotron 

magnet was installed (McMillan, 1940). The 60-inch cyclotron could accelerate deuterons to 22 MeV 

and alphas to 44 MeV (McMillan, 1946). 

2

 See 42 C.F.R. pt. 83 for a full description of the procedures summarized here. Additional internal procedures are 

available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

9 of 56 

 In 1941, E. O. Lawrence had the 37-inch cyclotron modified to demonstrate the feasibility of 

electromagnetic separation of uranium isotopes using the principle of the mass spectrograph. The 

cyclotron, modified in this manner for the purpose of separating uranium isotopes, became known as 

the calutron. This technology, developed at LBNL, was used for the calutrons built at the Y-12 

facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, which led to the enrichment of a sufficient quantity of uranium to 

assemble the first uranium-based atomic bomb, which was eventually used to destroy Hiroshima 

(Heilbron, 1981, pp. 23-25). 

Much of the early research with uranium, plutonium, and other transuranic elements was conducted in 

Gilman Hall at the University of California, Berkeley campus during the 1940s. This research often 

involved chemistry with samples that had been irradiated by the local cyclotrons and/or in the reactors 

in Chicago, Oak Ridge, and Hanford. The irradiated samples would often contain traces of elements 

or radioisotopes that had never before been discovered. The University researchers would isolate and 

identify these new radioisotopes and investigate their chemical and physical properties. Plutonium239 was first discovered in Gilman Hall from a uranium sample that had been irradiated with neutrons 

(Seaborg, 1976). The fissionability of uranium-233 was also first demonstrated by researchers at the 

Berkeley campus during this time period (LBNL, 1983). Some AEC-related polonium work was 

performed outside Gilman Hall, in the Old Chemistry Building (Ponedel, 1956). 

In July 1945, with the construction of the 184-inch cyclotron, work began to migrate above the 

University campus to the site now referred to as LBNL. The 184-inch cyclotron was completed in 

1946 and continues to be operational today. It is now referred to as the Advanced Light Source. 

Other machines built in the late 1940s included a 300 MeV synchrotron, a 5 MeV Van de Graaff 

generator, and linear accelerators capable of accelerating protons to several hundred MeV (McMillan, 

1946). 

The Bevatron, which was given its name from its ability to accelerate protons to billions of eV, was 

completed in 1954. In 1957, the Heavy Ion Linear Accelerator (HILAC) came into operation. Later, 

in 1971, the HILAC was joined to the Bevatron as a heavy ion injector. This combination was 

referred to as the Bevalac. 

These machines, in use at LBNL from 1942 through 1961 and after, were used for a variety of 

purposes, which included radioisotope generation, study of fundamental particles, uranium 

enrichment, and production of transuranic elements. Radioactive materials used and/or generated 

from these activities included tritium, numerous fission and activation products, isotopes of uranium 

and thorium, and several transuranic elements. Applications included nuclear weapons research and 

development, nuclear energy research, medical and biological sciences, and general physics and 

chemistry research. 

4.2 Radiation Exposure Potential from Operations 

With the generation, use, and study of various radioactive materials in unencapsulated form, there 

existed the potential for intakes through inhalation, ingestion, and absorption through skin or wounds. 

Potential sources of internal radiation exposure at the site included airborne and surface contamination 

from uranium, transuranic elements, tritium, and a variety of fission and activation products generated 

during research and development activities involving these materials, as well as from production of 

these materials in the cyclotrons, linear accelerators, and other high-energy radiation-generating 

devices. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

10 of 56 

The potential for external radiation dose also existed at locations where radioactive materials were 

handled or stored, and where radiation-generating devices were operated. Sources of exposure 

included beta and photon radiation emitted from materials containing uranium and plutonium, as well 

as both fission and activation products from samples that were irradiated by the local cyclotrons 

and/or in the reactors in Chicago, Oak Ridge, and Hanford. There was also potential for direct 

exposure to photons and neutrons produced by the cyclotrons and from fission studies with uranium 

and plutonium. Based on the site operations outlined in Section 4.1, sources of external radiation 

exposure included photon, neutron, and beta radiation emitted from a variety of radioactive materials 

and/or radiation-generating devices. 

4.3 Time Period Associated with Radiological Operations 

The Radiation Laboratory, which eventually became known as the Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory, was founded in 1931 by Ernest Orlando Lawrence. Once the Manhattan Engineer District 

(MED) was founded in 1942, the Radiation Laboratory became part of the MED. Department of 

Energy (DOE)-related radiological operations have been ongoing at LBNL since the beginning of the 

MED, August 13, 1942, through the present. It is also clear from Dr. Glenn Seaborg’s notes that 

radiation exposures could have been occurring within chemistry buildings on the University campus 

since the very beginning of the MED (Seaborg, 1976). 

4.4 Site Locations Associated with Radiological Operations 

Radiological operations took place in all of the accelerator buildings and associated laboratories 

located within the current LBNL footprint. Radiological operations also took place on the University 

campus; campus locations included, but were not necessarily limited to Gilman Hall, the Old 

Chemistry Building, the Old Radiation Laboratory, Donner Laboratory, and Crocker Hall. A list of 

facilities and room numbers where specific radioactive materials were used at LBNL is included in 

ORAUT-TKBS-0049. 

4.5 Job Descriptions Affected by Radiological Operations 

Given the general lack of process knowledge or detailed source term information, and the potential for 

airborne radioactive contamination in many of the affected locations, it is not possible to determine 

that any specific work group was not potentially exposed to radioactive material releases or possible 

subsequent contamination. NIOSH has insufficient information associating job titles and/or job 

assignments with specific radiological operations or conditions and is, therefore, unable to define 

potential radiation exposure conditions based on worker job descriptions. 

5.0 Summary of Available Monitoring Data for the Proposed Class 

The primary data used for determining internal exposures are derived from personal monitoring data, 

such as urinalyses, fecal samples, and whole-body counting results. If these are unavailable, the air 

monitoring data from breathing zone and general area monitoring are used to estimate the potential 

internal exposure. If personal monitoring and breathing zone area monitoring are unavailable, internal 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

11 of 56 

exposures can sometimes be estimated using more general area monitoring, process information, and 

information characterizing and quantifying the source term. 

This same hierarchy is used for determining the external exposures to the cancer site. Personal 

monitoring data from film badges or thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are the primary data used 

to determine such external exposures. If there are no personal monitoring data, exposure rate surveys, 

process knowledge, and source term modeling can sometimes be used to reconstruct the potential 

exposure. 

A more detailed discussion of the information required for dose reconstruction can be found in 

OCAS-IG-001, External Dose Reconstruction Implementation Guideline, and OCAS-IG-002, Internal 

Dose Reconstruction Implementation Guideline. These documents are available at: 

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas/ocasdose.html. 

5.1 Data Capture Efforts and Sources Reviewed 

In addition to examining its Site Research Database (SRDB) to locate documents supporting the 

evaluation of the proposed class, NIOSH identified and reviewed numerous data sources to locate 

information relevant to determining the feasibility of dose reconstruction for the class of employees 

proposed for this petition. This included determining the availability of information on personnel 

monitoring, workplace monitoring, and radiological source term data. 

NIOSH data capture efforts for LBNL focused on DOE record archives, including those located at 

LBNL and numerous other national laboratories, DOE Germantown, DOE Legacy Management 

offices, the Federal Records Center in San Bruno, California, National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA) archives, and multiple electronic databases. Data capture efforts also 

included University of California record archives, including the University’s Bancroft Library, other 

University libraries, internet searches, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the State of 

California Department of Health Services. Additional details regarding the data sources reviewed by 

NIOSH are presented at the end of this document in Attachment 1. 

5.2 Worker Interviews 

To obtain additional information, NIOSH interviewed three individuals that were employed at LBNL 

during the time period covered by this evaluation. 

 Personal Communication, 2008, Personal Communication with Former University of California, 

Berkeley Employee; Telephone Interview by ORAU Team; March 24, 2008, 1:00 PM EDT; SRDB 

Ref ID: 77694 (Personal Communication, 2008a)

 Personal Communication, 2008, Personal Communication with Former University of California, 

Berkeley Employee; Telephone Interview by ORAU Team; March 24, 2008, 3:00 PM EDT; SRDB 

Ref ID: 77696 (Personal Communication, 2008b)

 Personal Communication, 2008, Personal Communication; In-Person Interview by ORAU Team; 

May 20, 2008; SRDB Ref ID: 77695 (Personal Communication, 2008c)
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

12 of 56 

5.3 Internal Personnel Monitoring Data 

During the evaluated period, only limited bioassay information was found for workers at LBNL. 

NIOSH has located memos indicating that in the early days of the LBNL site (1940s and possibly 

1950s) blood counts were performed for personnel working frequently with radioactive material 

(Barrett, 1949a; Barrett, 1949b; Barrett, 1949c; Barrett, 1949d) to determine if there were blood 

abnormalities caused by their exposure. 

NIOSH has captured approximately 230 bioassay sample results prior to 1960 (Various, 1945-59). 

These results were collected in response to incidents and were primarily analyzed at other facilities, 

including Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Argonne 

National Laboratory. These samples consisted primarily of urine samples, but also included feces, 

blood, sputum, and nasal swab samples. Analytes consisted of several transuranic radionuclides, 

including plutonium-239, curium-244, and americium-241. Other analytes included polonium-210, 

radium-226, protactinium-231, actinium-227, fission products, and isotopes of uranium and thorium. 

Specific sampling dates are very limited, with many of them collected in a very short timeframe (e.g., 

150 of them were collected within a one-week period in 1947). 

LBNL started its own in-house bioassay program in 1960, when it began sequentially numbering all 

of its bioassay results; they continued this practice through at least 1991. It appears that NIOSH has 

captured all of the results, beginning with sample number 1, which was collected in January 1960. 

5.4 External Personnel Monitoring Data 

During the early days, radiation exposure to workers at LBNL was measured and controlled using 

radiation survey instruments. Monthly reports from July and August 1944, titled Monthly Report on 

Toxic Dust and Short-Wave Radiation, include film badge dosimetry data from badges used in 

Buildings 2, 4, and 6, and Gilman Hall (Ballenger, 1944a; Ballenger, 1944b). Based upon this report 

and other information concerning availability of radiation instrumentation and dosimetry methods, it 

is evident that some external dose monitoring was being conducted before 1948; however, NIOSH has 

not found any claimant-specific external dosimetry data prior to 1948. 

Based on a review of all claimant files from the 1940s, the earliest exposure records reported by DOE 

were from early 1948. These results were reported on a form with a version date of July 2, 1947. 

This form is NIOSH’s earliest indication of a formal external dose records program at LBNL. 

5.5 Workplace Monitoring Data 

Available workplace monitoring data for LBNL from 1942 through 1961 include, but are not limited 

to, the following: 1950 gamma- and fast-neutron surveys of the 60-inch cyclotron, using film 

dosimeters (LBNL Survey, 1952-1960); a 1961 fast-neutron survey of the 60-inch cyclotron, using a 

cadmium-lined, paraffin-moderated, BF3 counter (LBNL Survey, 1961); 1947 contamination surveys 

of the Donner Laboratory (LBNL Survey, 1947); 1946 and 1947 contamination surveys of Gilman 

Hall (LBNL Survey, 1946-1947); 1958 ion chamber and BF3 counter measurements at the 184-inch 

cyclotron (LBNL Survey, 1958); 1948 through 1952 fast-neutron surveys at the 184-inch cyclotron 

(LBNL Survey, 1948-1952); 1953 to 1962 Bevatron surveys, including fast-neutron flux 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

13 of 56 

measurements using indium-foil detectors within a cadmium-enclosed paraffin sphere, ion chamber 

measurements, and fast- and slow-neutron proportional counter measurements with and without BF3

(LBNL Survey, 1953-1962); 1960 air sampling results for Buildings 5, 70, 71, 184-inch cyclotron, 

Animal House, and Crocker (LBNL Survey, 1960); 1946 through 1948 contamination surveys in 

Gilman Hall (LBNL Survey, 1946-1948); and 1947 and 1948 polonium contamination surveys in the 

Old Chemistry Building (LBNL Survey, 1947-1948). 

5.6 Radiological Source Term Data 

A comprehensive listing of the many radionuclides and their quantities used at LBNL over the period 

of this evaluation is unavailable. There are however, multiple data sources that provide snapshots in 

time of inventories for some radionuclides. In 1949, the uranium inventory included several hundred 

kilograms of multiple uranium compounds (Browne, 1949). A 1950 inventory listing of “Availability 

of Relatively Stable Isotopes of the Heavy Elements” included 1 mCi actinium-227; 479 mg thorium230; 2.4 mg protactinium-231; 209.5 mg neptunium-237; 1 mCi promethium-147; 57.91 mg 

americium-241; and 1 mg technetium-99 (Garden, 1950). A letter to the U.S. Atomic Energy 

Commission, dated August 21, 1956, describes work with a batch of polonium-210 in equilibrium 

with about 500 mCi of lead-210 (Ponedel, 1956). These are only examples of some available sourceterm data. Additional source-term data are summarized in ORAUT-TKBS-0049. 

6.0 Feasibility of Dose Reconstruction for the Proposed Class 

42 C.F.R. § 83.14(b) states that HHS will consider a NIOSH determination that there was insufficient 

information to complete a dose reconstruction, as indicated in this present case, to be sufficient,

without further consideration, to conclude that it is not feasible to estimate the levels of radiation 

doses of individual members of the class with sufficient accuracy. 

In the case of a petition submitted to NIOSH under 42 C.F.R. § 83.9(b), NIOSH has already 

determined that a dose reconstruction cannot be completed for an employee at the DOE or AWE 

facility. This determination by NIOSH provides the basis for the petition by the affected claimant. 

Per § 83.14(a), the NIOSH-proposed class defines those employees who, based on completed 

research, are similarly affected and for whom, as a class, dose reconstruction is similarly not feasible. 

In accordance with § 83.14(a), NIOSH may establish a second class of co-workers at the facility for 

whom NIOSH believes that dose reconstruction is similarly infeasible, but for whom additional 

research and analysis is required. If so identified, NIOSH would address this second class in a 

separate SEC evaluation rather than delay consideration of the claim currently under evaluation (see 

Section 10). This would allow NIOSH, the Board, and HHS to complete, without delay, their 

consideration of the class that includes a claimant for whom NIOSH has already determined a dose 

reconstruction cannot be completed, and whose only possible remedy under EEOICPA is the addition 

of a class of employees to the SEC. 

This section of the report summarizes research findings by which NIOSH determined that it lacked 

sufficient information to complete the relevant dose reconstruction and on which basis it has defined 

the class of employees for which dose reconstruction is not feasible. NIOSH’s determination relies on 

the same statutory and regulatory criteria that govern consideration of all SEC petitions. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

14 of 56 

6.1 Feasibility of Estimating Internal Exposures 

NIOSH has evaluated the available personnel and workplace monitoring data and source term 

information and has determined that there are insufficient data for estimating internal radiation doses 

to members of the proposed class, as described below. 

Although there are indications that blood counts were performed in the early days of the LBNL site 

for personnel who were working frequently with radioactive material, NIOSH has not found the 

results of these blood checks and it is unlikely that NIOSH could determine annual organ doses from 

such measurements. 

Given that the approximately 230 bioassay sample results captured by NIOSH prior to 1960 (Various, 

1945-59) were primarily collected in response to incidents, and given that the specific sampling dates 

are very limited, with many of them collected in a very short timeframe, these data are not particularly 

useful for determining the exposure conditions for personnel across the site or over a 14-year period. 

LBNL began sequentially numbering all of its bioassay results in 1960 and continued this practice 

through at least 1991. It appears that NIOSH has captured all of the results, starting with sample 

number 1, which was collected in January 1960. The extent of the program at the beginning is 

unclear. Although the numbering system began in 1960, and there are over 200 samples indicated for 

1960 and 1961, the program was apparently not yet ramped up. In March 1961, the head of the Health 

Chemistry Department wrote a memo expressing concern over the lack of a comprehensive bioassay 

program for the site (Howe, 1961) stating that: “The laboratory has a clear obligation under its 

contract with the AEC to maintain employee exposure within the limits recommended by the National 

Committee on Radiation Protection. These limits include exposure from both external and internal 

sources, but during most of LRL’s history it was always assumed that internal exposure was 

negligible and need not be directly measured.” He then went on to write: “In light of the foregoing, 

we believe it only reasonable and prudent that Berkeley adopt a full-fledged bioassay program. To 

achieve this without a long building, staffing, and development period will likely require use of an 

outside service organization” (Howe, 1961). 

 

According to a 1963 memo titled Report on Bioassay Program for 1962, the bioassay program 

increased significantly from 1961 to 1962. The memo reports that double the gross alpha 

determinations were made and that these accounted for less than half of the analyses for the year 

(Parker, 1963). Another memo from the Health Chemistry Department details a “revision to the 

bioassay schedule” and lists more than 200 participants and includes the criteria and frequency for 

participation (Soule, 1962). The listed criteria include the following: 

 General annual frequency for radiochemists and health chemistry personnel; 

 A semi-annual frequency for radiochemists and health chemistry personnel most highly 

exposed to alpha emitters; 

 Annual sampling of selected members of the building trades frequently assigned maintenance 

work in active areas; and 

 Annual sampling of selected administrative personnel whose exposures were essentially zero and 

would be considered control samples. 

 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

15 of 56 

NIOSH has determined that by 1962 there was an active bioassay program with specific criteria that 

encompassed a range of job functions, with sampling on a prescribed frequency. Original records for 

all of the collected samples from 1960 through 1991 are available. 

The workplace monitoring data that are available for the site from 1942 through 1961 are insufficient 

for dose reconstruction purposes, or to bound doses. 

The available source term data for LBNL, some of which are summarized in ORAUT-TKBS-0049, 

are not sufficient to bound doses for the site. 

NIOSH does not have access to sufficient personnel monitoring, workplace monitoring, or source 

term data to estimate potential internal radiation doses to workers from the various radioactive 

materials handled at LBNL during the period under evaluation (August 13, 1942 through December 

31, 1961). Consequently, NIOSH finds that it is not feasible to estimate, with sufficient accuracy, the 

level of internal radiation doses that could have been incurred by members of the class of employees 

covered by this evaluation. By 1962, the internal dosimetry program was fully operational and has 

remained so through the present day. 

Although it is not possible to completely reconstruct internal radiation doses for the period from August 

13, 1942 through December 31, 1961, NIOSH intends to use any internal monitoring data that may 

become available for an individual claim (and that can be interpreted using existing NIOSH dose 

reconstruction processes or procedures). Dose reconstructions for individuals who do not qualify for 

inclusion in the SEC may be performed using these data, as appropriate. 

6.2 Feasibility of Estimating External Exposures 

This evaluation responds to a petition based on NIOSH determining that internal radiation doses to 

various radioactive materials handled at LBNL could not be reconstructed for a dose reconstruction 

referred to NIOSH by the Department of Labor (DOL). As noted above, HHS will consider this 

determination to be sufficient without further consideration to determine that it is not feasible to 

estimate the levels of radiation doses of individual members of the class with sufficient accuracy. 

Consequently, it is not necessary for NIOSH to fully evaluate the feasibility of reconstructing external 

radiation doses for the class of workers covered by this report. 

It is clearly evident from the available data that there was a significant potential for exposure to 

external radiation sources during the period under evaluation, from both radioactive material use and 

from direct exposure to radiation-producing equipment (e.g., cyclotrons). Although it is also evident 

that some external personnel monitoring was being conducted at least as early as 1944, NIOSH has 

found that external dosimetry data are generally unavailable prior to 1948, in the claims submitted for 

evaluation. Consequently, it is not feasible to estimate external doses for the class of employees prior 

to 1948. 

Although it is not possible to reconstruct external radiation doses for the period from August 13, 1942 

through December 31, 1947, NIOSH intends to use any external monitoring data that may become 

available for an individual claim (and that can be interpreted using existing NIOSH dose 

reconstruction processes or procedures). Dose reconstructions for individuals who do not qualify for 

inclusion in the SEC may be performed using these data, as appropriate. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

16 of 56 

Adequate reconstruction of medical dose for LBNL workers is likely to be feasible by using claimantfavorable assumptions in the complex-wide Technical Basis Document, Dose Reconstruction from 

Occupationally Related Diagnostic X-Ray Procedures (ORAUT-OTIB-0006) and applicable site 

profile guidance. 

6.3 Class Parameters Associated with Infeasibility 

It is clear that radiation exposures could have been occurring at LBNL since the very beginning of the 

MED on August 13, 1942 (Seaborg, 1976). Although DOE-related radiological operations have been 

ongoing at LBNL from the beginning of the MED in 1942 through the present, sufficient personnel 

dosimetry data are available for the purposes of dose reconstruction beginning in 1962. NIOSH has 

therefore recommended that the class include the time period from August 13, 1942 through 

December 31, 1961. 

Radiological operations at LBNL were widespread and potentially included all buildings on “the Hill” 

as well as all LBNL affiliated buildings on the Berkeley university campus, which included but were 

not limited to the Old Radiation Laboratory, Donner Laboratory, Crocker Hall, LeConte Hall, Gilman 

Hall and the Old Chemistry Building. NIOSH has therefore recommended that the class definition 

include all buildings during the specified time period. 

Given the general lack of process knowledge or detailed source term information, and the potential for 

airborne radioactive contamination in many of the affected locations, it is not possible to determine 

that any specific work group was not potentially exposed to radioactive material releases or possible 

subsequent contamination. No specific job titles or occupations for the class definition can be 

identified; NIOSH has therefore recommended that the class include all workers. 

7.0 Summary of Feasibility Findings for Petition SEC-00160 

This report evaluates the feasibility for completing dose reconstructions for employees at LBNL from 

August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1961. NIOSH determined that members of this class may 

have been exposed to radiation from uranium, transuranic elements, and numerous other radioactive 

materials, as well as from cyclotrons, linear accelerators, and other radiation-generating devices. 

NIOSH lacks sufficient information, which includes personnel monitoring, workplace monitoring, or 

source term data that would allow it to estimate the potential internal radiation doses from radioactive 

materials to which the proposed class may have been exposed. 

In addition, prior to 1948, NIOSH lacks sufficient information to allow it to estimate potential external 

radiation doses from radioactive materials or from the radiation-generating devices in use at that time. 

NIOSH has documented herein that it cannot complete the dose reconstruction related to this petition. 

The basis of this finding demonstrates that NIOSH does not have access to sufficient information to 

estimate either the maximum radiation dose incurred by any member of the class or to estimate such 

radiation doses more precisely than a maximum dose estimate. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

17 of 56 

After 1947, the adequate reconstruction of external dose is considered likely to be feasible. 

Reconstruction of medical dose for LBNL workers for all time periods is also considered likely to be 

feasible. 

8.0 Evaluation of Health Endangerment for Petition SEC-00160 

The health endangerment determination for the class of employees covered by this evaluation report is 

governed by EEOICPA and 42 C.F.R. § 83.14(b) and § 83.13(c)(3). Pursuant to these requirements, if 

it is not feasible to estimate with sufficient accuracy radiation doses for members of the class, NIOSH 

must determine that there is a reasonable likelihood that such radiation doses may have endangered 

the health of members of the class. The regulations require NIOSH to assume that any duration of 

unprotected exposure may have endangered the health of members of a class when it has been 

established that the class may have been exposed to radiation during a discrete incident likely to have 

involved levels of exposure similarly high to those occurring during nuclear criticality incidents. If 

the occurrence of such an exceptionally high-level exposure has not been established, then NIOSH is 

required to specify that health was endangered for those workers who were employed for a number of 

work days aggregating at least 250 work days within the parameters established for the class or in 

combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of 

employees in the SEC. 

NIOSH has determined that members of the class were not exposed to radiation during a discrete 

incident likely to have involved levels of exposure similarly high to those occurring during nuclear 

criticality incidents. However, the evidence reviewed in this evaluation indicates that some workers in 

the class may have accumulated chronic radiation exposures through intakes of various radionuclides 

and from direct exposure to radiation-producing equipment and radioactive materials. Consequently, 

NIOSH is specifying that health was endangered for those workers covered by this evaluation who 

were employed for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days within the parameters 

established for this class or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one 

or more other classes of employees in the SEC. 

9.0 NIOSH-Proposed Class for Petition SEC-00160 

The evaluation defines a single class of employees for which NIOSH cannot estimate radiation doses 

with sufficient accuracy. This class includes all employees of the Department of Energy, its 

predecessor agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors who worked at the Lawrence Berkeley 

National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, from August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1961, for a 

number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this 

employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more 

other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

10.0 Evaluation of Second Similar Class 

In accordance with § 83.14(a), NIOSH may establish a second class of co-workers at the facility, 

similar to the class defined in Section 9.0, for whom NIOSH believes that dose reconstruction may not 

be feasible, and for whom additional research and analyses is required. If a second class is identified, 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

18 of 56 

it would require additional research and analyses. Such a class would be addressed in a separate SEC 

evaluation rather than delay consideration of the current claim. At this time, NIOSH has not identified 

a second similar class of employees at LBNL for whom dose reconstruction may not be feasible. 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

19 of 56 

This page intentionally left blank 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

20 of 56 

11.0 References 

42 C.F.R. pt. 81, Guidelines for Determining the Probability of Causation Under the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000; Final Rule, Federal 

Register/Vol. 67, No. 85/Thursday, p 22,296; May 2, 2002; SRDB Ref ID: 19391 

42 C.F.R. pt. 82, Methods for Radiation Dose Reconstruction Under the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000; Final Rule; May 2, 2002; SRDB Ref ID: 

19392 

42 C.F.R. pt. 83, Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special 

Exposure Cohort Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 

2000; Final Rule; May 28, 2004; SRDB Ref ID: 22001 

42 U.S.C. §§ 7384-7385 [EEOICPA], Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000; as amended; OCAS website 

Ballenger, 1944a, Monthly Report on Toxic Dust and Short-Wave Radiation—August 1944; H. F. 

Ballenger; September 1, 1944; SRDB Ref ID: 30088, pp. 3-6 

Ballenger, 1944b, Monthly Report on Toxic Dust and Short-Wave Radiation—July 1944; H. F. 

Ballenger; August 1, 1944; SRDB Ref ID: 30088, pp. 7-9 

Barrett, 1949a, List of Personnel Working with Radioactive Materials in the Building 4 and 5 Areas, 

correspondence to K. Fores; R. J. Barrett; September 27, 1949; SRDB Ref ID: 21007, p. 3 

Barrett, 1949b, List of Chemists Working with the Hottest Subject Matter, correspondence to R. L. 

Dobson; R. J. Barrett; October 18, 1949; SRDB Ref ID: 21007, p. 2 

Barrett, 1949c, Blood Examinations for Chemists, correspondence to R. Pennell; R. J. Barrett; May 

12, 1949; SRDB Ref ID: 21020, p. 3 

Barrett, 1949d, List of Chemists and Health Chemists for Two Monthly Blood Check as of July 28, 

1949, correspondence to K. Bradley; R. J. Barrett; July 28, 1949; SRDB Ref ID: 21020, p. 2 

Browne, 1949, Uranium Inventory, correspondence to R. H. Ball; H. J. Browne; September 27, 1949; 

SRDB Ref ID: 21008 

Garden, 1950, Availability of Relatively Stable Isotopes of the Heavy Elements, correspondence to E. 

Pleckenstein; N. B. Garden; March 1950; SRDB Ref ID: 21114 

Heilbron, 1981, Lawrence and His Laboratory, web publication from 1981 Newsmagazine 

Publication; J. L. Heilbron, Robert W. Seidel, and Bruce R. Wheaton; 1981; 

http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Research-Review/Magazine/1981/81fepi2.html, last accessed 

January 19, 2010; SRDB Ref ID: 33201 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

21 of 56 

Howe, 1961, Bioassay Program, correspondence with attached description of bioassay program 

features; P. W. Howe; March 17, 1961; SRDB Ref ID: 20569 

LBNL, 1983, Radiological Survey and Remedial Actions for Gilman Hall, University of California, 

Berkeley, includes an attachment with remedial action agreements; Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL); March 9, 1983; SRDB Ref ID: 30329 

LBNL Survey, 1946-1947, Contamination Surveys of Gilman Hall; Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL); various dates from 1946 through 1947; SRDB Ref ID: 20955 

LBNL Survey, 1946-1948, Contamination Surveys in Gilman Hall; Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL); various dates from 1946 through 1948; SRDB Ref ID: 30100 

LBNL Survey, 1947, Contamination Surveys of the Donner Laboratory; Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL); March through December 1947; SRDB Ref ID: 20954 

LBNL Survey, 1947-1948, Polonium Contamination Surveys in the Old Chemistry Building; 

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL); various dates from 1947 through 1948; SRDB Ref 

ID: 30348 

LBNL Survey, 1948-1952, Fast Neutron Surveys of the 184-Inch Cyclotron; Lawrence Berkeley 

National Laboratory (LBNL); various dates from 1948 through 1952; SRDB Ref ID: 21537 

LBNL Survey, 1952-1960, Gamma and Fast Neutron Surveys of the 60-Inch Cyclotron Using Film 

Dosimeters; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL); various dates from 1952 through 

January 1960; SRDB Ref ID: 13999 

LBNL Survey, 1953-1962, Bevatron Surveys, including fast neutron flux measurements using indium 

foil detectors within a cadmium-enclosed paraffin sphere, ion chamber measurements, and fast and 

slow neutron proportional counter measurements with and without BF3; Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL); various dates from 1953 through 1962; SRDB Ref ID: 21549 

LBNL Survey, 1958, Ion Chamber and BF3 Counter Measurements at the 184-Inch Cyclotron; 

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL); various dates from January through September 

1958; SRDB Ref ID: 21533 

LBNL Survey, 1960, Air Sampling Results for Buildings 5, 70, 71, 184-Inch Cyclotron, Animal 

House, and Crocker; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL); May 1960; SRDB Ref ID: 

21659 

LBNL Survey, 1961, Fast Neutron Survey of the 60-Inch Cyclotron Using a Cadmium-lined, Paraffin 

Moderated, BF3 Counter; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL); September 19 through 

September 21, 1961; SRDB Ref ID: 14001 

McMillan, 1940, A Brief History of Cyclotron Development at the University of California; Edwin M. 

McMillan; January 1940; SRDB Ref ID: 21752 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

22 of 56 

McMillan, 1946, Summary of Physical Experiments Under Consideration-April 1946, written 

summary of discussion; E. M. McMillan; April 1946; SRDB Ref ID: 27099, pp. 3-8 

ORAUT-OTIB-0006, Dose Reconstruction from Occupationally Related Diagnostic X-Ray 

Procedures, Rev. 03 PC-1; Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) Team Dose Reconstruction 

Project for NIOSH; December 21, 2005; SRDB Ref ID: 20220 

ORAUT-TKBS-0049, Site Profile for the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Rev. 01; Oak 

Ridge Associated Universities Team (ORAUT) Dose Reconstruction Project for NIOSH; April 2, 

2007; SRDB Ref ID: 31090 

Parker, 1963, Report on Bioassay Program for 1962; Howard G. Parker; January 31, 1963; SRDB Ref 

ID: 21442 

Personal Communication, 2008a, Personal Communication with Former University of California, 

Berkeley Employee; Telephone Interview by ORAU Team; March 24, 2008, 1:00 PM EDT; SRDB 

Ref ID: 77694

Personal Communication, 2008b, Personal Communication with Former University of California, 

Berkeley Employee; Telephone Interview by ORAU Team; March 24, 2008, 3:00 PM EDT; SRDB 

Ref ID: 77696

Personal Communication, 2008c, Personal Communication; In-Person Interview by ORAU Team; 

May 20, 2008; SRDB Ref ID: 77695

Ponedel, 1956, Summary of Information and Request to Underwrite the Rehabilitation of Room 309, 

Chemistry Building, correspondence to E. C. Shute; Ivan M. Ponedel; August 21, 1956; SRDB Ref 

ID: 30345, pp. 3-4 

Seaborg, 1976, Early History of Heavy Isotope Research at Berkeley-August 1940 to April 1942; 

Glenn T. Seaborg; June 1976; SRDB Ref ID: 33097 

Soule, 1962, Revision to Bioassay Schedule, correspondence to Howard Parker with attached revised 

schedule; Harvey Soule; March 22, 1962; SRDB Ref ID: 20908 

Various, 1945-59, Various Internal Exposure Information, Correspondence, and Bioassay Samples; 

various authors; various dates from 1945-1959; SRDB Ref ID: 32456 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

23 of 56 

This page intentionally left blank 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Attachment 1: Data Capture Synopsis 

Since Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) and the University of California – Berkeley campus were separate covered facilities, data capture efforts for each site have been summarized separately in the tables belowintroduction to this document, both of these sites are now covered as LBNL. 

Table A1-1: Summary of Holdings in the SRDB for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

Data Capture Information General Description of Documents Captured C

Primary Site/Company Name: Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory; DOE 1942-present Other Site Names: 

Radiation Laboratory LBL Lawrence Radiation Laboratory University of California California Resources & Development 

Environmental reports, internal dosimetry TBDs, dose levels around accelerators, x-ray machine surveys, incident reports, personnel contamination reports, exposure summaries, contracts, Gilman Hall reports, individual employee exposure records, bioassay cards, bioassay logbooks, film badge reports, bioassay results, bioassay annual reports, process knowledge interviews, and records transmittals. 

06/

State Contacted: California Radiologic Health Branch Paul Lavely (916) 650-0561 

No records were available from the California Radiologic Health Branch. 

03/

Argonne National Laboratory - East Proposals for the National Nucleonics Committee. 04/Brookhaven National Laboratory Brief discussion on fast neutron dosimetry and DOELAP accreditation, 

brief account of collaboration with Brookhaven on SSC magnet design, a DOE rad con manual implementation, and site history. 

08/

CDC Interlibrary Loan A history of Manhattan Engineer District radiation control practices and 

Seaborg's plutonium project journals. 

05/

Claimant Review of links between DOE occupational exposures and illness and 

the results of an FOIA request for bevatron survey data with the requestor's dose history. 

10/

University of Colorado at Boulder Report of neutron dosimetry studies. 09/DOE Germantown Certification docket for Gilman Hall. NA DOE Legacy Management - Grand Junction Office LBNL accelerator project requiring increased production rate at 

Fernald, LOOW imports Eldorado sources for LBNL, and changing requirements for dumping radioactive waste at sea. 

05/

24 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-1: Summary of Holdings in the SRDB for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

Data Capture Information General Description of Documents Captured C

DOE Legacy Management - MoundView (Fernald Holdings, includes Fernald Legal Database) 

Waste treatment reports, evaluation of health and safety programs, a 

nationwide survey of normal uranium scrap materials, transfers of thorium to the Colonie Site, and a report on the 1952 bioassay and analytical chemistry conference. 

04/

Federal Records Center, San Bruno Tritium reports, effluent data, thorium-229 experiment, employee 

medical report, incident reports, environmental reports, fallout sampling, progress reports, air sampling reports, individual employee exposure histories, instrument development reports, survey reports, source inventories, film badge results, activity hazard documents, bioassay reports, safety procedures, bioassay program specifications, TRIGA Mark III annual reports, surveys of 184" cyclotron, demolition of 60" cyclotron, shielding studies, dosimetry procedures, 1995 internal dosimetry TBD, radiation worker rosters, facility and equipment design specifications, radiological protection procedures, materials inventories, waste disposal, ALARA program review, neutron surveys, 88" cyclotron studies, ES&H operational guides, and urinalysis record cards. 

09/

Hanford Operations plan for Operation Henre. 01/Internet - DOE Hanford Declassified Document Retrieval System (DDRS) 

Hanford monthly reports with LBNL references, typically relating to visiting staff. 

10/

Internet - DOE OpenNet Histories of transuranic elements research, reports to Congress, and a 

brief mention of metallurgical research. 

12/

Internet - DOE OSTI Energy Citations Hanford monthly report with LBNL references. 01/Internet - DOE OSTI Information Bridge Stannard's Radioactivity and Health, boundary doses from bevatron 

operations, environmental assessments, Marvin Goldman oral history, and human radiation experiments. 

08/

Internet - DOE OSTI Science Accelerator Transuranic element reports. 03/Internet - Google Complex-wide environmental reports, DOE finding aid, history of the 

development of the atomic bomb, and information on the chemistry of polonium. 

05/

Internet - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Environmental reports, air emissions reports, and a history of the lab. 05/Internet - repositories.cdlib.org 1950 quarterly report. 02/Internet - University of California Bancroft Library Interview with Anne Dettner. 04/

25 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-1: Summary of Holdings in the SRDB for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

Data Capture Information General Description of Documents Captured C

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Results and data for bioassay test samples, exposures of Pacific Test Group, an

171 air sample cards. 

Los Alamos National Laboratory Photodosimetry Evaluation Book "Bible" Volume VIII Procedures 

1996-2001. 

09/

Mound Museum 1948 and 1949 quarterly reports and a Mound transfer voucher. 11/NARA Atlanta Bioassay procedures, employee medical examination observations, field 

progress reports, and a DOE indoor radon study. 

02/

NARA Kansas City Certification docket and surveys for Gilman Hall. 01/NARA Laguna Niguel Plans for Project Dribble. 10/NARA San Bruno Incident reports, 60" cyclotron surveys and monitoring reports, 

environmental reports, health chemistry reports, fallout reports, air, 

water, and stack sampling reports, and dose rates from neutron sources. 

11/

Oak Ridge National Laboratory Proposal for production of Fe-55 and Fe-59 at the Berkeley 60" 

cyclotron. 

08/

Office of Scientific and Technical Information A test of the oxidation resistance of a zirconium-vanadium alloy and 

proceedings of a 1962 nuclear propulsion conference. 

09/

ORAU Team Documented communication regarding Gilman Hall, definition of daily 

dose in LBNL records, and an LBNL site profile. 

04/

ORISE Chelation DTPA data for DOE employees. 08/SAIC Annual radiation exposure summaries. 09/Savannah River Site 1950s dosimetry visitor cards and LBNL experiments in the 100 Area. 08/SC&A Trip reports, reassessment of bevatron exposures, bioassay lab reports, 

neutron dosimetry reports, transuranic chemistry reports, accelerator shielding reports, effluent monitoring reports, incident reports, tritium 

air dispersion modeling, health physics notes, epidemiological studies, personnel dosimetry procedures, and radioisotope inventories. 

07/

Southern Illinois University AEC construction cost differentials. 10/Unknown Beryllium reports, LBNL facility list, environmental reports, progress 

reports, Gilman Hall study, and information from a neutron dosimetry workshop. 

04/

Washington University Libraries - St. Louis Research reports including plutonium chelation, a pulsed neutron 

source, paraffin decontamination of concrete surfaces, and quarterly reports. 

04/

26 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-1: Summary of Holdings in the SRDB for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

Data Capture Information General Description of Documents Captured C

TOTAL 

Table A1-2: Internet Database Searches for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Note: The normally prescribed publicly accessible internet database searches were not performed for LBNL. These searches were not perfor

active DOE site. Limited internet searches were conducted to attempt to locate data not available via the site's resources. 

Table A1-3: OSTI Documents Requested for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

DOCUMENT NUMBER DOCUMENT TITLE RE

No documents ordered. N/A N/A 

27 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-4: Summary of Holdings in the SRDB for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Data Capture Information General Description of Documents Captured C

Primary Site/Company Name: University of California 

Other Site Names: California Resources and Development, 

University of California Bancroft Library, Gilman Hall Contacts: Site EEOICPA contact; Archivist; retired site nurse, aids with EEOICPA; Dosimetry Supervisor; Physics Instrumentation, 1940's; Superintendent of Electronic Shops, 1940's 

Treating contaminated wounds, note from Seaborg's journal, and a building floor plan. 

06/

State Contacted: California Radiologic Health Branch No records were available from the California Radiologic Health 

Branch. Additionally, the former Radiation Safety Officer at UC Berkeley (currently an employee of California's Radiologic Health Branch) was contacted to discuss relevant buildings and potential location of records. 

03/

CDC Interlibrary Loan The plutonium story. 05/Claimant Miscellaneous Linde material from an FOIA request including mention 

of University of California medical records. 

04/

Comprehensive Epidemiologic Data Resource (CEDR) No relevant data identified. 03/Department of Energy Methods of separating U-233 from thorium. 06/DOE Germantown Facility list, exposure hazard and safety procedures, and a certification 

docket for Gilman Hall. 

05/

DOE Hanford Spectral and output measurements of a monoenergetic wide beam Kfluorescence x-ray unit. 09/DOE Hanford Declassified Document Retrieval System (DDRS) 

1943 progress reports, Hanford progress reports with University of California issues, and trip reports including a Crocker Hall report. 

10/

DOE Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Gilman Hall area surveys, personnel assignments, exposure records, 

radiological surveys, remedial actions reports, and various internal exposure and bioassay samples. 

08/

DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1958 gamma exposure summaries and a high exposure alert list. 05/

28 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-4: Summary of Holdings in the SRDB for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Data Capture Information General Description of Documents Captured C

DOE Legacy Management Considered Sites General site information, long-term surveillance needs assessment, 

letter stating Gilman Hall was only California MED site qualified for FUSRAP, and site fact sheets. 

03/

DOE Legacy Management - Grand Junction Office Status of the University of California under AEC revised accounting 

practices in 1948. 

01/

DOE Legacy Management - MoundView (Fernald Holdings, includes Fernald Legal Database) 

Final transfer in April 1966 to University of California Lawrence Radiation Lab and Los Alamos Scientific Lab and a DOE annual radionuclide air emission report. 

01/

DOE Los Alamos National Laboratory Scheduling University of California employee urinalyses and Operation 

Teapot air sampling. 

08/

DOE OpenNet Early history of heavy isotope research at Berkeley and health problems 

of workers at Berkeley Metallurgical Project. 

03/

DOE OSTI Energy Citations No relevant data identified. 04/DOE OSTI Information Bridge Stannard's Radioactivity and Health and oral histories of Nello Pace and 

Cornelius Tobias. 

06/

Google Gilman Hall historical information, FUSRAP description of site, and an 

AEC report to Congress. 

04/

Missouri Department of Natural Resources A report citing the completion of remediation at the University of 

California. 

10/

Mound Museum Transfer vouchers. 06/NARA Atlanta Physical and laboratory examination, preliminary survey, urine results, 

dosimetry data, HP practices, summary of work done at Berkeley, 

reactor development, accountability reports, and weekly reports. 

06/

NARA College Park AEC beryllium documents from 1947 to 1950. UnNARA Kansas City Gilman Hall surveys and certification docket. 01/NARA San Bruno Finger film dosimeters, MED era researchers' logbooks from Gilman 

Hall, spill report, and a 1944 toxic dust report. 

02/

National Academies Press (NAP) No relevant data identified. 04/National Institute of Health No relevant data identified. 04/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) - Nevada Site Office 

No relevant data identified. 04/

NRC Agencywide Document Access and Management (ADAMS) 

FUSRAP sites review. 04/

ORAU Team Documented communications and project spreadsheets. 03/

29 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-4: Summary of Holdings in the SRDB for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Data Capture Information General Description of Documents Captured C

SAIC Radiation exposure of AEC and contractor personnel. 09/Southern Illinois University Disposal of radioactive wastes in the metropolitan St. Louis area and a 

description of the 1949 cryptographic telecommunications net. 

10/

University of Rochester Completing arrangements to receive a Cm-244 source from the 

University of California. 

08/

Unknown Completion of decontamination of Gilman Hall, collection of letters, 

lists and pages from a Gilman Hall study, surveys, and reports of polonium and beryllium. 

03/

Washington State University (U.S. Transuranium and Uranium Registries) 

No relevant data identified. 03/

Washington University Libraries - St. Louis No relevant data identified. 04/TOTAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

CEDR http://cedr.lbl.gov/ COMPLETED 03/29/2008 

University of California Gilman Hall California Resources and Development California Resources & Development 

0 

Department of Energy http://www.doe.gov/ COMPLETED 06/18/2008 

University California "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA Gilman Hall AND plutonium -ORAU -NIOSH Gilman Hall AND neutron flux -ORAU -NIOSH Wendell Latimer -ORAU -NIOSH Ernest Lawrence AND "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH Glenn Seaborg AND "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH Gilman Hall uranium -ORAU -NIOSH Gilman Hall Room 307 -ORAU -NIOSH California Resources and Development -ORAU -NIOSH California Resources & Development -ORAU -NIOSH 

161 

30 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

DOE Hanford DDRS http://www2.hanford.gov/declass/ COMPLETED 10/17/2008 

"Gilman Hall" AND plutonium Glenn Seaborg "Gilman Hall" AND uranium Wendell Latimer Ernest Lawrence University of California Gilman Hall California Resources and Development Berkeley 

10 

DOE Legacy Management Considered Sites http://csd.lm.doe.gov/ COMPLETED 03/20/2008 

N/A N/A 

DOE OpenNet http://www.osti.gov/opennet/advancedsearch.jsp COMPLETED 03/27/2008 

Wendell Latimer (author) 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Wendell Latimer (full text) 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Glenn Seaborg AND Gilman Hall plutonium AND Gilman Hall uranium AND Gilman Hall Ernest Lawrence AND Gilman Hall 

104 

neutron flux AND Gilman Hall solvent extraction AND Gilman Hall California Resources and Development California Resources & Development Atomic Energy Commission AND "Gilman Hall" Manhattan Engineer District AND Gilman Hall Room 307 AND Gilman Hall Berkeley AND plutonium AND Gilman radiation AND Gilman contamination AND Gilman 

31 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

DOE OSTI Energy Citations http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/ COMPLETED 04/06/2008 

University of California AND Gilman Hall 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 "Gilman Hall" AND plutonium 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 "Gilman Hall" AND uranium 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 "Gilman Hall" AND solvent extraction 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 "California Resources and Development" 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 California Resources & Development 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 

13 

DOE OSTI Information Bridge http://www.osti.gov/bridge/advancedsearch.jsp COMPLETED 06/02/2009 

Gilman Hall 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Wendell Latimer 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Glenn Seaborg 1/1/1942 - 12/31/93 Ernest Lawrence 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1943 Berkeley AND plutonium AND Gilman 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Gilman AND "Room 307" 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Gilman AND "neutron flux" 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Gilman Hall AND "solvent extraction" 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Gilman Hall AND uranium 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Gilman Hall AND "Atomic Energy Commission" 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Gilman Hall AND "Manhattan Engineer District" 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Gilman Hall AND contamination 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Gilman Hall AND radiation 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 California Resources 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 

68 

Gilman Hall AND americium 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 Manhattan Engineer District AND "Gilman Hall" 1/1/1942 - 12/31/1983 

32 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Google http://www.google.com COMPLETED 04/06/2008 

University of California AND "Gilman Hall" plutonium AND "Gilman Hall" uranium AND "Gilman Hall" Gilman Hall California Resources and Development California Resources & Development University of California Berkeley americium OR Am241 OR Am-241 "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA 

University of California Berkeley Am-241 OR 241-Am OR 241Am "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Berkeley "Am 241" OR ionium OR Th230 "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA University of California Berkeley Th-230 OR "Th 230" OR 230Th "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Berkeley "230 Th" OR 230-Th "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California neptunium Gilman Hall "Atomic Energy Commission" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Np237 OR Np-237 OR "Np 237" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California 237Np OR 237-Np OR "237 Np" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA 

7,5

33 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

University of California polonium OR Po210 OR Po-210 "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA University of California 210Po OR 210-Po "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Berkeley Gilman Hall "210 Po" "Po 210 " -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Berkeley thorium OR Th232 OR Th-232 "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California 232Th OR 232-Th OR thorium "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Gilman Hall "Th 232" OR "232 Th" "Z metal" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Gilman Hall myrnalloy OR "chemical 10-12" "chemical 10-66" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Gilman Hall ionium OR UX1 OR UX2 -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA University of California Gilman Hall Th230 OR Th-230 -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Gilman Hall "Th 230 " -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA University of California Gilman Hall 230Th OR 230-Th "230 Th" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA University of California Gilman Hall Th234 OR Th-234 "Th 234" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA 

34 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Gilman Hall 234Th OR 234-Th OR "234 Th" "University of California " -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Gilman Hall tritium Berkeley "University of California" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Gilman Hall Berkeley H3 Atomic Energy Commission "University of California" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA HTO OR H-3 "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA Berkeley mint "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley uranium Atomic Energy Commission "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission U-233 OR U233 OR "U 233" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 233U OR 233-U OR "233 U" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission U234 OR U-234 OR "U 234" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 234U OR 234-U OR "234 U" "Gilman Hall " -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission U235 OR U-235 OR "U 235" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 235-U OR 235U OR "235 U" "Gilman Hall" Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission U238 OR U-238 OR "U 238" "Gilman Hall" 

35 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 238U OR 238-U OR "238 U" "Gilman Hall" Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission U308 OR U-308 OR "U 308" "Gilman Hall" Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 308U OR 308-U OR "308 U" "Gilman Hall" Berkeley Gilman Hall "uranium extraction" Berkeley "black oxide" OR "brown oxide" OR "green salt" "Gilman Hall" Berkeley "orange oxide" OR "yellow cake" OR UO2 "Gilman Hall" Berkeley UO3 OR UF4 OR UF6 "Gilman Hall " Berkeley C-216 OR C-615 OR C-65 "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH, -ORAU, -EEOICPA Berkeley U308 OR C-211 "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission plutonium "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission Pu-238 OR Pu238 OR "Pu 238" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 238Pu OR 238-Pu OR "238 Pu" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission Pu-239 OR Pu239 OR "Pu 239" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA 

36 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 239Pu OR 239-Pu OR "239 Pu" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission Pu240 OR Pu-240 OR "Pu 240" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 240Pu OR 240-Pu OR "240 Pu" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission Pu-241 OR Pu241 OR "Pu 241" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 241Pu OR 241-Pu OR "241 Pu" "Gilman Hall " -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission radium OR Ra-226 OR Ra226 "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "Ra 226" OR 226-Ra OR 226Ra "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "226 Ra" OR Ra-228 OR Ra228 "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "Ra 228" OR 228Ra OR 228-Ra "Gilman Hall " -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "228 Ra" OR radon OR Rn-222 "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission Rn222 OR "Rn 222" OR 222Rn "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 222-Rn OR "222 Rn" OR thoron "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA 

37 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission Rn-220 OR Rn220 OR "Rn 220" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission 220Rn OR 220-Rn OR "220 Rn" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley protactinium OR Pa-234m OR Pa234m "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley 234mPa OR 234m-Pa OR "Pa 234m" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley strontium OR Sr-90 OR Sr90 "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU –EEOICPA Berkeley "Sr 90" OR 90-Sr OR 90Sr "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley oralloy OR postum OR tuballoy "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley "uranyl nitrate hexahydrate" OR UNH OR K-65 "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley "sump cake" OR "uranium dioxide" OR "uranium tetrafluoride" "Gilman Hall" -NIOSH -ORAU -EEOICPA Berkeley "uranium hexafluoride" OR "uranium trioxide" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley accident "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA –iowa 

Berkeley Gilman-Hall air-dust OR air-filter "air count " -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA 

38 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley "airborne test" OR "belgian congo ore" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA Berkeley alpha Atomic Energy Commission "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley "breathing zone" OR BZ OR calibration "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission columnation OR contamination 

OR bio-assay "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley "chest count" OR curie OR denitration "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley "denitration pot" OR derby OR regulus "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission dose OR dosimeter OR dosimetric "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission dosimetry OR electron "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission beta OR "body burden" OR bioassay "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission environment OR "Ether-Water project" "GIlman Hall" Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission exposure OR "exposure investigation" OR "radiation exposure" "Gilman Hall" Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission external OR fecal "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa 

39 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley "F machine" OR "feed material" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA –iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission femptocurie OR film "Gilman 

Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission fission OR fluoroscopy "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Gilman Hall "Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley FUSRAP OR gamma-ray OR "gas proportional" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission health OR "health physics" OR "health instrument" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "gaseous diffusion" OR H.I. "Gilman Hall " -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission HI OR HP OR HEU "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley hydrofluorination OR "highly enriched uranium" "Gilman 

Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "in vitro" OR "in vivo" OR incident "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission ingestion OR inhalation OR internal "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission investigation OR isotope OR isotopic "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA 

40 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "isotopic enrichment" OR "JS 

Project" OR Landauer "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "liquid scintillation" OR log OR "log sheet" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "log book" OR "low enriched uranium" OR LEU "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "maximum permissible concentration" OR MPC OR metallurgy "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission microcurie OR millicurie OR "mixed fission product" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley MFP OR monitor OR "air monitoring" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission nanocurie OR neutron OR "nasal wipe" "Gilman Hall " -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission nose wipe "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission nuclear "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -

NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission Chicago-Nuclear OR "nuclear fuels" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA –Iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "type A; NTA" OR "nuclear track emulsion" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA –Iowa 

41 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "occupational radiation exposure" OR occurrence "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "ore concentrate" OR "PC project" OR permit "Gilman Hall " -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "radiation work permit" OR "safe work permit" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission Gilman-Hall "special work permit" RWP OR SWP 

–ORAU 

–NIOSH 

–EEOICPA 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission picocurie OR "phosphate 

research" OR photon "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission pitchblende OR "pocket ion chamber" OR PIC "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission problem OR procedure "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "derived air concentration" OR DAC OR "gamma ray" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission radeco OR "lung count" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission radiation "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA –iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission radioactivity OR radiograph OR radiological "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA –iowa 

42 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley "radiological survey data sheet" OR RSDR "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley radionuclide OR rafffinate "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Berkeley reactor Atomic Energy Commission "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission respiratory OR "retention schedules" OR roentgen "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission sample OR "air sample" OR "dust sample" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "general area air sample" OR 

sampling OR "air sampling" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "dust sampling" OR "general area air sampling" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission source OR "sealed source" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA –iowa Berkeley "solvent extraction" OR spectra OR spectrograph "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission spectrography OR spectrum OR standard "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA –iowa 

43 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "operating standard" OR "processing standard" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission survey OR "building survey" OR "routine survey" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley Atomic Energy Commission "special survey" OR "technical basis" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley "thermal diffusion" OR "thermoluminescent dosimeter" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley TLD OR "Tiger Team" OR "tolerance dose" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley urinalysis OR urine OR WBC "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH 

-EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley "whole body count" OR "working level" OR WL "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa Berkeley x-ray OR xray OR "x ray" "Gilman Hall" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA -iowa "California Resources and Development" americium OR Am241 OR Am-241 "California Resources and development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA "Am 241" OR 214Am OR 241-Am "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA 

44 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

"241 Am" OR ionium OR Th230 "California Resources and Development " -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Th-230 OR "Th 230" OR 230Th "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA 230-Th OR "230 Th" OR neptunium "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Np 237 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA 237Np OR 237-Np OR "237 Np" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA palm OR palmolive OR polonium "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Po210 OR Po-210 OR "Po 210" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA 210Po OR 210-Po OR "210 Po" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA thorium OR thoria OR Th232 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA Th-232 OR "Th 232" OR 232Th "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA 232-Th OR "232 Th" OR "Z metal" "California Resources and Development" 

45 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

Z-metal OR myrnalloy OR "chemical 10-66" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU, -NIOSH -EEOICPA "chemical 1066" OR "chemical 10 66" OR "chemical 18-12" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA "chemical 1812" OR "chemical 18 12" OR "chemical 10-12" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA "chemical 1012" OR "chemical 10 12" OR UX1 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA UX2 OR Th-234 OR Th234 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA "Th 234" OR 234-Th OR 234Th "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA "234 Th" OR tritium OR H3 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA H-3 OR mint OR HTO "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA uranium OR U233 OR U-233 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA "U 233" OR 233U OR 233-U "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA "233 U" OR U234 OR U-234 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH -EEOICPA "U 234" OR 234U OR 234-U "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH –EEOICPA 

46 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

"234 U'" OR U235 OR "U 235" "California Resources and Development" U-235 OR 235-U OR 235U "California Resources and Development" -ORUA -NIOSH "235 U" OR U238 OR U-238 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "U 238" OR 238-U OR 238U "California Resources and Development " -ORAU -NIOSH "238 U" OR U308 OR U-308 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "U 308" OR 308-U OR 308U "California Resources and Development " -ORAU -NIOSH "308 U" OR "black oxide" OR "brown oxide" "California Resources and Development " -ORAU -NIOSH "green salt" OR "orange oxide" OR "yellow cake" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH UO2 OR UO3 OR UF4 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH UF6 OR C-216 OR C-616 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH C-65 OR C-211 OR U308 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 

47 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

"uranium extraction" OR "uranium dioxide" OR "uranium hexafluoride" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH "uranium tetrafluoride" OR "uranium trioxide" OR plutonium "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH Pu-238 OR Pu238 OR "Pu 238" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 238Pu OR 238-Pu OR "238 Pu" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH Pu-239 OR Pu239 OR "Pu 239" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 239Pu OR 239-Pu OR "239 Pu" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH Pu-240 OR Pu240 OR "Pu 240" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 240Pu OR 240-Pu OR "240 Pu" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH Pu-241 OR Pu241 OR "Pu 241" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 241Pu OR 241-Pu OR "241 Pu" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH radium OR Ra-226 OR Ra226 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "Ra 226" OR 226-Ra OR 226Ra "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 

48 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

"226 Ra" OR Ra-228 OR Ra228 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH "Ra 228" OR 228Ra OR 228-Ra "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "228 Ra" OR radon OR Rn-222 "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH Rn222 OR "Rn 222" OR 222Rn "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 222-Rn OR "222 Rn" OR thoron "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH Rn-220 OR Rn220 OR "Rn 220" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 220Rn OR 220-Rn OR "220 Rn" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH protactinium OR Pa234m OR Pa-234m "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "Pa 234m" OR 234mPa OR 234m-Pa "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "234m Pa" OR strontium OR Sr-90 "California Resources and Development " -ORAU –NIOSH Sr90 OR "Sr 90" OR 90-Sr "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 90Sr OR "90 Sr" OR oralloy "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 

49 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

postum OR tuballoy OR "uranyl nitrate hexahydrate" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH UNH OR K-65 OR "sump cake" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH accident OR "air count" OR "air dust" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "air filter" OR "airborne test" OR alpha "California Resources and 

Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "belgian congo ore" OR beta OR bioassay "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH bio-assay OR breath OR "breathing zone" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH BZ OR "body burden" OR calibration "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "chest count" OR collimation OR contamination "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH curie OR denitration OR "denitration pot" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH derby OR regulus OR "derived air concentration" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH DAC OR dose OR dosimeter "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH dosimetric OR dosimetry OR electron "California Resources and 

Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 

50 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

environment OR "Ether-Water Project" OR exposure "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH "exposure investigation" OR "radiation exposure" OR external "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "F machine" OR fecal OR "feed material" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH femptocurie OR film OR fission "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH fluoroscopy OR "Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program:" OR FUSRAP "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH gamma-ray OR "gamma ray" OR "gas proportional" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH gaseous diffusion OR health OR "health instrument" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "health physics" OR H.I. OR HI "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH HP OR "highly enriched uranium" OR HEU "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH hydrofluorination OR "in vitro" OR "in vivo" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH incident OR ingestion OR inhalation "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH internal OR investigation OR isotope "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 

51 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

isotopic OR "isotopic enrichment" OR "JS Project" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH Landauer OR "liquid scintillation" OR log "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "log sheet" OR "log book" OR "low enriched uranium" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH LEU OR "lung count" OR "maximum permissible concentration" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH MPC OR metallurgy OR microcurie "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH millicurie OR "mixed fission product" OR MFP "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH monitor OR "air monitoring" OR nanocurie "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH "nasal wipe" OR neutron OR "nose wipe" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH nuclear OR Chicago-Nuclear OR "nuclear fuels" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "nuclear track emulsion type A" OR NTA OR "occupational radiation exposure" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH occurrence OR "ore concentrate" OR "PC project" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH permit OR "radiation work permit" OR "safe work permit" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 

52 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

"special work permit" OR RWP OR SWP "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH "phosphate research" OR photofluorography OR photon "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH picocurie OR pitchblende OR "pocket ion chamber" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH PIC OR problem OR procedure "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH radeco OR radiation OR radioactive "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH radioactivity OR radiograph OR radiological "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "Radiological Survey Data Sheet" OR RSDS OR radionuclide 

"California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH raffinate OR reactor OR respiratory "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "retention schedules" OR roentgen OR sample "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "air sample" OR "dust sample" OR "general area air sample" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "air sampling" OR "dust sampling" OR "general area air sampling" 

"California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "solvent extraction" OR source OR "sealed source" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 

53 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

spectra OR spectrograph OR spectroscopy "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH spectrum OR standard OR "operating standard" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "processing standard" OR survey OR "building survey" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "routine survey" OR "special survey" OR "technical basis" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "thermal diffusion" OR "thermoluminescent dosimeter" OR TLD "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH "Tiger Team" OR "tolerance dose" OR "uranium aluminum alloy" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH UAlx OR "uranium aluminide" OR urinalysis "California Resources and Development" -ORAU –NIOSH urine OR "whole body count" OR WBC "California Resources and 

Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "working level" OR WL OR X-ray "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH "X ray" OR Xray OR "x-ray screening" "California Resources and Development" -ORAU -NIOSH 

54 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

Table A1-5: Internet Database Searches for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Database/Source Keywords / Phrases 

National Academies Press http://www.nap.edu/ COMPLETED 04/02/2008 

University of California and "Gilman hall" California resources and development 

537 

National Institute of Health http://www.nih.gov COMPLETED 04/02/2008 

University of California "Gilman Hall" -ORAU –NIOSH California Resources and Development -ORAU -NIOSH California Resources & Development -ORAU -NIOSH Gilman Hall plutonium -ORAU -NIOSH Gilman Hall uranium -ORAU -NIOSH 

17 

NNSA - Nevada Site Office www.nv.doe.gov/main/search.htm COMPLETED 04/02/2008 

Gilman Hall California Resources & Development 

0 

NRC ADAMS Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html COMPLETED 04/16/2008 

"California Resources and Development" University of California filtered with "Gilman Hall" 

5 

U.S. Transuranium & Uranium Registries http://www.ustur.wsu.edu/ COMPLETED 03/29/2008 

University of California Gilman Hall AND plutonium Gilman Hall AND uranium Gilman Hall AND "neutron flux" Gilman Hall AND "solvent extraction" Wendell Latimer Gilman Hall California Resources and Development California Resources & Development 

14 

Washington University Libraries - St. Louis http://library.wustl.edu/units/westcampus/govdocs/nukes/index.html COMPLETED 04/26/2008 

"Gilman Hall" "California Resources and Development" "University of California AND Berkeley" "California Resources & Development" 

50 

55 of 56 
SEC-00160 01-20-10 Rev.0 FINAL 

56 of 56 

Table A1-6: OSTI Documents Requested for University of California, Berkeley, CA 

Document Number Document Title 

No documents ordered. N/A N/A