alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 filed on March 26, 1999) pertaining to the Sonic Foundry, Inc. 1995
Stock Option Plan, the Sonic Foundry, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan and the Shareholder Relations Consultant Warrants, (ii) the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 filed on November 12, 1999) pertaining to shares of common
stock issuable upon conversion of debentures and exercise of certain warrants,
and (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 filed on October 25, 1999)
pertaining to shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of certain warrants
of our report dated November 5, 1999, with respect to the financial statements
and schedule of Sonic Foundry, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended September 30, 1999.

                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
December 13, 1999
-up

Ye


DISCHARGE SUMMARY

Y3


gs


Page 40
EXHIBIT E

MEDICAL INFORMATION


N. BALA, M.D.

REPORT OF CONSULTATION

#6


A


mp

¢x
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6055 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to indemnify government 

employees, and employees entities that have contracts with such governments, from certain judgements for acting within their capacity to comply 

with their official duties and responsibilities, and other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2018 

Mr. GOMEZ (for himself, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. NORTON, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, and Mr. QUIGLEY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to indemnify 

government employees, and employees entities that have 

contracts with such governments, from certain judgements for acting within their capacity to comply with 

their official duties and responsibilities, and other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Our Cities Safe 

5 Act of 2018’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6055 IH

1 SEC. 2. INDEMNIFICATION FOR GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. 

2 Section 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

3 (8 U.S.C. 1324) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(f) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply to any 

6 officer or employee of the Federal Government, or of a 

7 State or local government, or to an officer or employee 

8 of an entity with which such a government has a contract, 

9 who is acting in accordance with the law of the State or 

10 locality in which the employee engaged in conduct which 

11 would otherwise violate this section.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this
Quarterly Report of Forbes Energy Services Ltd. filed on Form 10-Q (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Melvin
Cooper, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ L. Melvin CooperL. Melvin CooperSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary


Date:
May 13, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,182,210
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      18,273,882
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 36,246,161
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      35,869,295
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        36,194,353
<LOANS>                                     98,642,635
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,492,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             200,365,778
<DEPOSITS>                                 151,208,763
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,417,502
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,645
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,736,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             200,365,778
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,038,783
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,436,436
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               626,457
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,101,676
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,534,445
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,195,782
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,905,894
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  221,671
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (21,215)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,578,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (589,644)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (589,644)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (422,999)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.017)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.84
<LOANS-NON>                                    133,386
<LOANS-PAST>                                   380,382
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               281,441
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,283,234
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   22,985
<RECOVERIES>                                    10,553
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,492,473
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,399,061
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         93,412
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21


Subsidiary                                      Jurisdiction of Organization
----------                                      ----------------------------

ROV Holding, Inc.                               Delaware

Rayovac Europe B.V.                             Netherlands

Rayovac Far East Limited                        Hong Kong

Rayovac Canada Inc.                             Canada

Rayovac Europe Limited                          United Kingdom

Rayovac (UK) Limited                            United Kingdom

Rovcal, Inc.                                    California

Rayovac Latin America Ltd.                      Cayman Islands

Ray-O-Vac Overseas Corp.                        Panama

Ray-O-Vac Dominicana, S.A.                      Dominican Republic

Ray-O-Vac De Venezuela, S.A.                    Venezuela

Ray-O-Vac De Columbia, S.A.                     Columbia

Duralux, S.A.                                   Guatemala

Distribuidora De Pilas, S.A.                    Honduras

Ray-O-Vac de El Salvador, S.A. de C.V.          El Salvador

Distribuidora M.A. Nicol, S.A.                  Guatemala

Ray-O-Vac De Mexico, S.A. de C.V.               Mexico

Industria De Pilas, S.A.                        Honduras

Dicapi, S.A.                                    Costa Rica
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 84 (Monday, May 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 23247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010; 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status: Closed to the Public.

Matters to be Considered: Compliance Status Report
    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: April 27, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10377 Filed 4-29-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Canistel Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executive Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: August 12, 2010
#### Robert Pridgen *v.*State Compensation Commissioner, *et al.*

(No. 8882)

Submitted February 8, 1939.

Decided March 14, 1939.

*Charles P. McCabe,*for appellant,

*Clarence W. Meadows,*Attorney General, and *Marlyn E. Lugar,*Special Assistant Attorney General, for ap-pellees.

Fox, President:

The claimant, while employed by the Branch Coal & Coke Company, and in the course of his employment, *137suffered an injury on the first day of July, 1937, the extent and nature of which are not involved in this appeal. The employer reported the injury to the Compensation Commissioner on October 25, 1937. On the 4th day of January, 1938, the claimant made out and signed an application, duly verified, asking for compensation on account of his injury and this application was filed in the office of the Compensation Commissioner on January 24, 1938. It will be noted that the application was verified three days after the expiration of the period within which it should have been filed at the office of the Compensation Commissioner under the-provisions of Code, 23-4-15, and was not in fact filed in said office until twenty-one days later. Compensation was refused on account of the failure to file this application within the time required by law, the final order in the matter having been entered by the Compensation Commissioner on the 23rd day of June, 1938. The first order refusing compensation was entered on the 27th day of January, 1938, and the last and final order was entered upon a petition filed with the Compensation Commissioner on June 17, 1938. An appeal being taken from the final order, and the action of the Compensation Commissioner having been upheld by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, in an order entered on October 22, 1938, the case comes to this court on appeal from that order.

This case is governed by the decision in *Young*v. *Compensation Com’r.,*121 W. Va. 126, 3 S. E. (2d) 517, this day decided, and it would seem to be unnecessary to repeat here the reasons upon which that case was decided. It is well, however, to note that in the *Young*case the application for compensation was signed and verified within the six months period, whereas in this case the application was not verified until after the expiration of the six months period and, of course, not filed within that period. This affords an additional reason why the rulings of the Compensation Commissioner and the Appeal Board should be upheld, and they are accordingly affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1444

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the 60-month

limit and increase the income limitation on the student loan interest

deduction.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 1999

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. BURNS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate

the 60-month limit and increase the income limitation

on the student loan interest deduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 60-MONTH LIMIT AND IN4 CREASE IN INCOME LIMITATION ON STU5 DENT LOAN INTEREST DEDUCTION.

6 (a) ELIMINATION OF 60-MONTH LIMIT.—

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 221 of the Internal

8 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to interest on edu9 cation loans) is amended by striking subsection (d)
2

•S 1444 IS

1 and by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as

2 subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively.

3 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

4 6050S(e) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘sec5 tion 221(e)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 221(d)(1)’’.

6 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

7 by this subsection shall apply with respect to any

8 loan interest paid after December 31, 1999, in tax9 able years ending after such date.

10 (b) INCREASE IN INCOME LIMITATION.—

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 221(b)(2)(B) of the

12 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amount

13 of reduction) is amended by striking clauses (i) and

14 (ii) and inserting the following:

15 ‘‘(i) the excess of—

16 ‘‘(I) the taxpayer’s modified ad17 justed gross income for such taxable

18 year, over

19 ‘‘(II) $50,000 (twice such dollar

20 amount in the case of a joint return),

21 bears to

22 ‘‘(ii) $15,000.’’

23 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

24 221(g)(1) of such Code is amended by striking
3

•S 1444 IS

1 ‘‘$40,000 and $60,000 amounts’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘$50,000 amount’’.

3 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

4 by this subsection shall apply to taxable years end5 ing after December 31, 1999.

Æ
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 

 National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

 Phone: 513-533-6825 

 Fax: 513-533-6826 

 

 July 2, 2008 

SEC Tracking number: SEC00094 

Peter M. Turcic, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Room C-4511 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Mr. Turcic: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as 

required by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to 

designate a class of employees at Horizons, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, as an addition to the Special 

Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000. On May 30, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS 

designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who worked at the Horizons, Inc. facility, 

from January 1, 1952, through December 31, 1956, for a number of work days aggregating 

at least 250 work days occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with 

work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in 

the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on June 29, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on June 29, 2008, members of this class of employees, defined as 

reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Larry J. Elliott 

 Director 

 Office of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**OF**

 

**PERIODIC REPORT**

 

I, Alessandro Sodi, the Chief Executive Officer of Diligent Board Member Services, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | May   19, 2014                          |   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | /s/   Alessandro Sodi                   |
|   | Alessandro   Sodi                       |
|   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal   Executive Officer)         |

 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diligent Board Member Services, Inc. and will be retained by Diligent Board Member Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Freedom Securities Holding Corporation - Massachusetts

Freedom Capital Management Corporation - Massachusetts
Freedom Distributors Corporation - Massachusetts
Freedom Trust Company - New Hampshire

The Sutro Group - Nevada
Sutro and Co. Incorporated - Nevada
Sutro Real Estate Corporation - California
Sutro Leasing Corporation - California
Sutro Equipment Leasing Corporation - California
Sutro Investment Partners, Inc. - California
Sutro Specialists, Inc. - California
Sutro Agency Corporation - California
Computer Systems Design, Inc. - California

Tucker Anthony Holding Corporation - Massachusetts
TADCO Alpha, Inc. - New York
TADCO Bravo, Inc. - New York
T.A. of Delaware, Inc. - Delaware
Tucker Anthony Leasing Corporation - Massachusetts
Tucker Anthony Realty Corporation - Massachusetts
Tucker Anthony Incorporated - Massachusetts
Gabriele, Hueglin & Cashman, Inc. - New York
GH&C Advertising Agency, Inc. - New York
Tucker Anthony Insurance, Inc. - Massachusetts
Tucker Anthony Insurance Agency of Maine, Inc. - Maine
Tucker Anthony Agency of N.Y., Inc. - New York
Tucker Anthony Insurance Agency of N.H., Inc. - New Hampshire

Freedom Clearing Corporation - Massachusetts

Freedom Services Corporation - Delaware

Freedom Specialist, Inc. - Delaware

Tocqueville Asset Management L.P. - New York

Cleary Gull & Reiland Inc.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 84 (Monday, May 3, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10237]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 0911161406-0195-04]
RIN 0648-AY37

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Individual 
Fishing Quota Program; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This action corrects the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section to 
a final rule published in the Federal Register on April 20, 2010, which 
erroneously waived the 30 day delay in effective date. A 30-day delay 
in effectiveness will allow fishermen to come into compliance with the 
terms of the rule, as was originally intended, without compromising any 
other aspect of the fishery. NMFS will not enforce the requirement that 
owners be onboard vessels unless otherwise required by statute or 
regulation.

DATES: Effective May 3, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Patsy A. Bearden, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    In the final rule, published on April 20, 2010, that revised the 
Individual Fishing Quota Program for the sablefish and halibut 
fisheries off Alaska (75 FR 20526), make the following correction in 
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. On page 20527, in the second 
column, delete this paragraph:
    ``For the same reasons, the AA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 
553(d)(3) to waive the 30 day delay in effective date.''

    Dated: April 27, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-10237 Filed 4-28-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
```
*

The Hon. Herman J. Weber, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by

designation. 

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 05a0147n.06

Filed: February 24, 2005

NO. 01-5340

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT L. LARKIN and )

BARBARA A. LARKIN, )

)

)

Plaintiffs-Appellants, )

)

) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

) WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

)

PFIZER, INC., and G.D. SEARLE & CO., )

)

)

Defendants-Appellees. )

______________________________________

 BEFORE: MERRITT and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges, and WEBER,*

 District

Judge.

PER CURIAM. In this products liability case, the district court exercised diversity

jurisdiction in granting summary judgment to the defendants, based on the court’s

conclusion that, although the Kentucky state courts had not spoken to the issue, the

learned intermediary doctrine should be applied to insulate from liability the manufacturers

of two drugs taken by plaintiff Robert Larkin. One or both of those drugs, prescribed by

Larkin’s physician, Dr. Reynolds, had caused a life-threatening skin condition that Reynolds
- 2 -

knew was a risk associated with each drug, but about which he had given Larkin no

information because Reynolds did not believe the risk was significant. 

On appeal, we could discern no way in which to predict with assurance what the

state courts would hold, if faced with a request to adopt the learned intermediary doctrine,

and we therefore certified the question to the Kentucky Supreme Court. In a recent

opinion, the Court adopted the doctrine in a closely divided opinion reported at Larkin v.

Pfizer, No. 2002-SC-0746-CL, 2004 WL 1361954 (Ky. June 17, 2004). Based on that

decision, we now AFFIRM the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment

to the defendants.