alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
99.4




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Brand
Neue Corp. (the “Company”) for the six months ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ashmi Deo,
Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
  1.
The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.
The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
   Date:
February
5, 2010
   ASHMI
DEO
 Ashmi
Deo
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer and Director
**Exhibit 99.4**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

Minera Andes Inc. 

Spokane, Washington 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 andS-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 333-77663, 333-34023 and 333-135634, respectively) of Minera Andes Inc., of our report dated March 26, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and our audit report on the internal controlover financial reporting of Minera Andes Inc. which appears in this Form 40-F. 

*(signed) BDO Dunwoody LLP*

**Chartered Accountants**

Vancouver, British Columbia 

March 26, 2008
| **ITEM 1. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS** |  |  |
|-------------------------------------|--|--|
|                                     |  |  |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00180

- CR

Lawrence ARMSTEAD

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR5830

The Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED August 3, 2016.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                        AIR TRANSPORT GROUP HOLDINGS, INC
            FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2008
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arnold  Leonora,  am the Chief  Executive  Officer and acting Chief Financial
Officer  of Air  Transport  Group  Holdings,  Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation  (the
"Company").  I am delivering  this  certificate in connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six month  period  ended  October 31,
2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 12, 2008
                                             By: /s/ Arnold Leonora
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Arnold Leonora
                                                President and Director
EXHIBIT 23.1




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 File No. 333-54164) of Vascular Solutions, Inc. of our
reports dated January 21, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial
statements, the financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.


                                 /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 10, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with filing the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report") by Champion Communication Services, Inc.
("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Registrant.


                                          /s/ ALBERT F. RICHMOND
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Albert F. Richmond
                                          Chief Executive Officer


                                          /s/ PAMELA R. COOPER
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Pamela R. Cooper
                                          Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 28, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Champion Communication Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Champion Communication Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       30
EX-10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 
 CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT 
 This Consulting Agreement Amendment (hereinafter the
“Amendment”) is made effective as of January 1, 2013 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) between Civitas Therapeutics, Inc. (“CIVITAS”) and Robert Roche (“Consultant”). 

WHEREAS, CIVITAS and Consultant entered into a Consulting Agreement effective as of December 16, 2011; 

WHEREAS, the parties want to increase the fee based Compensation paid to Consultant. 
 THEREFORE; 
 As of the Amendment Effective Date, Section 2a is replaced with the following:

  

	 	a.	Fees. CIVITAS shall pay Consultant a fee at the rate of $40,000 per year for Consulting Services rendered as the request of CIVITAS hereunder. Fees for Consulting
Services will be paid quarterly within thirty (30) days after the end of each fiscal quarter. 

 All other terms and
conditions of the Consulting Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall apply. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has caused this Amendment to be
executed by its duly authorized representative as of the Amendment Effective Date. 
  

			
	Civitas Therapeutics, Inc.
		
	By	 	 /s/ Glenn Batchelder

		 	duly authorized
		
	Name:	 	Glenn Batchelder
	Title:	 	President & CEO
		
	Date:	 	 Glenn Batchelder January 21, 2014

	
	Consultant
	
	 /s/ Robert Roche

	duly authorized
		
	Name:	 	Robert Roche
		
	Date:	 	 January 15, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





18 U.S.C. 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wi-Max Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Berman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 22, 2011





By:
/s/ Steven BermanSteven BermanChief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00055-CR

Larry W. Mishler

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 9

of Tarrant County (1203825)

August 22, 2013

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Bill Meier
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1489 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1489

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment to 
States of plot allowances for certain veterans eligible for burial in a 
     national cemetery who are buried in cemeteries of such States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 1999

   Mr. Biden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment to 
States of plot allowances for certain veterans eligible for burial in a 
     national cemetery who are buried in cemeteries of such States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF PLOT OR INTERMENT ALLOWANCE.

    Section 2303 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection;
    ``(c)(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary shall pay to any 
State, or agency or political subdivision of a State, a plot or 
interment allowance of $150 for the burial of any veteran who--
            ``(A) is eligible for burial in a national cemetery under 
        section 2402 of this title; and
            ``(B) is buried (without charge for the cost of a plot or 
        interment) in a cemetery, or a section of a cemetery, that--
                    ``(i) is used solely for the interment of persons 
                eligible for burial in a national cemetery; and
                    ``(ii) is owned by such State, or agency or 
                political subdivision.
    ``(2) The payment of a plot or interment allowance under this 
subsection shall be in addition to any benefits provided under section 
2302 or 2307 of this title, or subsection (a).
    ``(3) The Secretary may not pay a plot or interment allowance under 
this subsection for the burial of any veteran for which the Secretary 
pays a plot or interment allowance under subsection (b)(1).''.
                                 <all>
```
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

1150 Tusculum Ave

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH. 

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D. 

 Madison, Wisconsin 

Josie Beach 

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson 

 Rexburg, Idaho 

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa 

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D. 

 New York, New York 

Richard Lemen, Ph.D. 

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D. 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

Wanda I. Munn 

 Richland, Washington 

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. 

 College Station, Texas 

David B. Richardson, Ph.D. 

 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D. 

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico 

Loretta R. Valerio 

 Santa Fe, New Mexico 

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

May 8, 2017

The Honorable Thomas E. Price, M.D.

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Mr. Secretary:

 

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

completed its evaluation of Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00192 

concerning workers at the Rocky Flats Plant in Golden, Colorado, under 

the statutory requirements established by the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 and 

incorporated into 42 C.F.R. § 83.13.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for:

“All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor 

agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors who worked in 

any area of the Rocky Flats Plant in Golden, Colorado, from 

January 1, 1984, through December 31, 2005.” 

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and 

other information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with 

sufficient accuracy for members of this group, and therefore a class 

covering this group should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs 

with this determination.

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the March 22 and 

23, 2017, Board meeting held in Naperville, Illinois, the Board 

recommends that this class not be added to the SEC.

Enclosed is the documentation from the Board meeting(s) where this SEC 

class was discussed. The documentation includes copies of the petition, 

the NIOSH review thereof, and related materials. If any of these items are 

unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

 

[Signature on File]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEKName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board of Directors,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    August 16, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report
of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Saagar Govil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Saagar Govil.      
| | -----------------------
| | Saagar Govil           
| | Chief Executive Officer



Dated: October 2, 2014
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Canistel Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President, Director,
                                 Chief Executive Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: May 17, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY B. ALEXANDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cr-00202-MOC-DSC-1)

Submitted: August 18, 2021 Decided: October 12, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony B. Alexander appeals the district court’s orders affirming the magistrate 

judge’s order directing that Alexander be detained pending resolution of a supervised 

release revocation petition, and denying his motion for reconsideration.*

 We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Clark, 865 F.2d 

1433, 1437 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:18-cr-00202-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 

2021 & Apr. 13, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction to review the district court orders pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c).
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6946** 

BRUCE W. KOENIG , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; RODNEY RODERICK; JOHN WHITE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 03801

- JFM )

Submitted : November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Bruce Wayne Koenig , Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane

Weber, Assistant Attorney General , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Bruce W

. Koenig appeals the district court ’ s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ko enig

v. Md. Div. of Corr. , No. 1:13

- cv
- 03801

- JFM (D. Md. filed June
8, 2015 & entered June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1003 

CAF 14-01301 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF JOHN A. SABATINO, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

CHRISTINE M. AUSMAN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT,

AND KAYLA FARMER, RESPONDENT.

 

JEREMY D. ALEXANDER, UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

MARIAN J. CERIO, CANASTOTA, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

PAUL A. NORTON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, CLINTON. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Joan E.

Shkane, J.), entered June 10, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family

Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by appellant on June 2, 2015, by the attorneys for the parties

on June 2 and 16, 2015, and by the Attorney for the Child on June 9,

2015,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: October 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Philip D. Miller, Principal
Executive Officer and I, Stephen D. Replin, Principal Financial Officer of
Regatta Capital Partners, Inc., (the "Company") certify that:





1.  I have reviewed the
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;





2.  Based on my knowledge,
this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report; and





3.  Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period
presented in this annual report.





Date:  March
29, 2010








/s/ Philip D.
Miller


Philip D.
Miller


Principal
Executive Officer








/s/ Stephen D.
Replin


Stephen
D. Replin


Principal
Financial Officer