alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.9







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Minera Andes Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 40-F for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen V. Ambrose, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





|      |                |  |                   |                                      
|----- | -------------- |  | ----------------- | -------------------------------------
|      |                |  | MINERA ANDES INC.
|      |                |  |                   |                                      
|Date: | March 31, 2009 |  | By:               | /s/ Allen V. Ambrose                 
|      |                |  |                   | Allen V. Ambrose                     
|      |                |  |                   | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a- 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Minera Andes, Inc. and will be retained by Minera Andes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.







---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50416

(Summary Calendar)

 

RICHARD L. CHANDLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RACHEL CHANDLER; UNITED STATES ARMY

FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING CENTER,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(USDC No. EP-96-CV-125)

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Richard L. Chandler appeals the district court’s dismissal of

his civil action on grounds of res judicata. The district court

did not err in determining that Chandler’s claims were, in part,

barred by res judicata. See Schmueser v. Burkburnett Bank, 937

F.2d 1025, 1031 (5th Cir. 1991). The district court did not abuse

its discretion in enjoining Chandler from filing or proceeding in

any lawsuit against any party based upon facts, incidents, or
2

matters arising from or pertaining to the divorce decree. Villar

v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1499 (5th Cir.)

(en banc), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 (1993). Because the order

of sanctions does not reduce the monetary sanctions to a sum

certain, this court declines to consider Chandler’s arguments that

the district court abused its discretion in imposing monetary

sanctions. See Southern Travel Club, Inc. v. Carnival Air Lines,

Inc., 986 F.2d 125, 131 (5th Cir. 1993). Chandler’s request that

this court declare his marriage void is DENIED. Chandler’s motion

to strike the brief of the United States Army Finance and

Accounting Center and to compel Rachel Chandler to file an

appellate brief is DENIED. 

The appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
CMF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0252, DA 20-0434, DA 20-0435

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NATHAN EDWARD HOWARD, JOSEPH

BULLINTON and JONATHAN 

HETTINGER,

Defendants and Appellants.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and 

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including December 27, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 12 2021

11/12/2021
EXHIBIT
31.1





Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


Securities
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14


as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





I,
Charles Adelman, certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Adelman Enterprises,
Inc.;





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.   I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:





a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)   disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.   I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)   all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal  controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b)   any
fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.





August 20,
      2010
                  By:Charles
      AdelmanPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
    Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
W.G. Jurgensen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

March 14, 2003

/s/ W.G. Jurgensen
--------------------------------

Name:  W.G. Jurgensen
Title: Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 16, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Grandpoint Capital, Inc., Los Angeles, California; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Santa Ana Business Bank, Santa Ana, California.
    In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied to 
engage de novo through its subsidiary, Grandpoint Capital Advisors, 
Inc., Los Angeles, California, in financial advisory acitivites to 
businesses and individuals, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(6) and in 
private placement of debt and equity securities activities, pursuant to 
section 225.28(b)(7)(iii), of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 15, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-1037 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Sonic Foundry, Inc.**

**Annual Report on Form 10-K**

**For the Year Ended September 30, 2005**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i)the Registration Statement (Form S-8 filed on March 26, 1999, amended on September 8, 2000 and September 15, 2004) pertaining to the Sonic Foundry, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the Sonic Foundry, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and theShareholder Relations Consultant Warrants, (ii) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 filed on September 8, 2000 and amended on December 21, 2001) pertaining to the 1999 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, (iii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3filed on May 15, 2000) pertaining to shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants, (iv) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 filed on November 21, 2001) pertaining to the Sonic Foundry, Inc. 2001 Deferred Compensation Plan, (v) theRegistration Statement (Form S-3 effective July 17, 2002) pertaining to shares issued and issuable pursuant to the conversion of debt and exercise of warrants, (vi) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 effective August 16, 2002) pertaining to sharesissued and issuable pursuant to the exercise of warrants, (vii) the Registration Statement (Form S-3 effective September 13, 2002) pertaining to shares issued and issuable pursuant to the exercise of warrants, and (viii) the Registration Statement(Form S-3 filed on April 23, 2004, amended on July 8, 2004 and September 15, 2004 and effective September 28, 2004) pursuant to shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, of our report dated November 14, 2003, with respect to the consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows and Schedule II of Sonic Foundry, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2003, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2005. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 

December 5, 2005 

 

50
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Green Earth Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, William J. Marshall, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Greg D. Adams, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 15, 2010



/s/ William J. MarshallWilliam J. MarshallChairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: November 15, 2010


/s/ Greg D. AdamsGreg D. AdamsChief Operating Officer  and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





[A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aurios Inc. for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aurios Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Aurios Inc.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:



/s/ Paul AttawayName:



Paul AttawayTitle:



Principal Executive Officer, PrincipalFinancial Officer and DirectorDate:



June 17, 2009
I rWMKn ~m~~ng GUS tor mecxwa ctme p~fkosearw~mve neentxt~. cs 

*wwe~ w a;st :3er+ rs no rnamwuon reaarma rnon~wma. bmm wce term. w raaw f 

F 5 3 mornye ztWlW eer-w of^& pmw by aff&sf rnatnmee that 

~wwrusand~atlota~~Mylna~~wDym~ofMe~Etih

mnefa~ew*~sg - ekpw-pemmp oslr(:wgr ma 

1AWX OWMWM6 W(ds 

prow class ?ave ten QC. altereJ t!ie ie. or aesrmpo. As a follow up to F.4, it seems ogthat no documents are either extant 

De~~cwpl~aspr,~,ro~e~Rm~MgPdbeuncieah.taCiv~~ 

deun3entatlM and(oraraMa@s) imcat-s Bae paserata tadlagDa exmwres were RQI mml?dced 

See <htto:1/66.218.69.?ei=UTF-S- - 

poten + . D .gov/niosf pdf~s~l~&~w~t.~f&W~~~~aI+~ad?ati~n+exu~~~re

%22+westinghouse&d=QCQtlhOljPBkf&icp=I&.intl=us~ This rlnc~~rnrrnt IS enclosec 

NOTE: In spite of the fact that upervisor was - _ _ .. ... - - - al Official Westinghouse document FORM 24903 F (q.v.), does NOT list . 

HIGHEST SECURITY CLEARANCE EVER Hthes same document states that I was "exempf" from the military and the 

P2 

draft. 

% 

R..

Yv~ehirre~~~4~oreraiem~~w~mat~

or avallaDle to jpeclttc activities at tne tast pmsaurgn 

rownanothewise 

IOCASl 

. 

though the article pertains to a different locale, the principles remain 

the same, and the difficulties have not been circumvented. 

r , . port F k wnitnued on tii rolk'iiq P.r ---" - --"--.-. --.. --
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arie Kilman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  March 31, 2009 |  | By: /s/ Yaron Tchwella
Yaron Tchwella Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
EXHIBIT 32.1 EXHIBIT 99 Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shade Down Under, Inc. ("SDU") on Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathaniel Allen, President and Chief Executive Officer of SDU, and I, Nathaniel Allen, Principal Financial Officer of SDU, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SDU. Date: December 12, 2008  /s/ Nathaniel Allen Nathaniel Allen President and Chief Executive Officer Date: December 12, 2008  /s/ Nathaniel Allen Nathaniel Allen Principal Financial Officer
NO. 07-08-0218-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 24, 2008

______________________________

MARK ANTHONY MARTINEZ, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 64 DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; TH

NO. A16898-0608; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING

_______________________________

Anders Opinion

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Mark Anthony Martinez (appellant) appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual

assault of a child. Pursuant to an agreement, he pled guilty to the offense and was granted

eight years deferred adjudication. The State subsequently filed a motion to proceed with

the adjudication of his guilt. It alleged that he had 1) used cocaine while on probation, 2)

failed to make his monthly reports, 3) failed to complete his community service hours, 4)

failed to attend AA/NA meetings as ordered, and 5) failed to complete a sex offenders
Appellant has the right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review from this opinion.

1

2

program. At the hearing, appellant pled true to the allegations contained in the motion.

The trial court then found that the allegations were true, adjudicated appellant guilty,

allowed opportunity to present evidence relating to punishment, and sentenced him to

fifteen years imprisonment. 

Appellant's counsel has now moved to withdraw, after filing a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and representing

that he has searched the record and found no arguable grounds for reversal. The motion

and brief illustrate that counsel notified appellant of his right to review the appellate record

and file his own brief or response. So too did we inform appellant that any pro se response

or brief he cared to file had to be filed by November 12, 2008. To date, appellant has

failed to file a response.

In compliance with Anders, appellate counsel addressed one potential ground for

appeal and explained why it was baseless. We, like appellate counsel, also reviewed the

record to determine whether there existed reversible error and found none. See Stafford

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (requiring us to conduct an

independent review).

Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the

trial court.1

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice 

Do not publish.