alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ROSE HILLS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,117
<PP&E>                                          64,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 312,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,780
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   312,051
<SALES>                                         70,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,742
<CGS>                                           15,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOSE HERNANDEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4606 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 30, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark Carpanini, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna B. Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Office of Compensation Analysis and Support 

Program Evaluation Report

Document Number: OCAS-PER-015 

Effective Date: 7/31/2007 

Revision No. 0

Mallinckrodt TBD Revision Page 1 of 2 

Author: Signature on file Date: 7/31/2007 Dave Allen, HP Team Leader 

Approval: Signature on file Date: 7/31/2007 J.W. Neton, Associate Director for Science 

Supersedes: None 

RECORD OF ISSUE/REVISIONS 

ISSUE 

AUTHORIZATION 

DATE 

7/31/2007

EFFECTIVE 

DATE 

7/31/2007 

REV. NO. 

0 

DESCRIPTION 

New document to determine which 

previously completed claims require 

evaluation for the effect of revising the 

Mallinckrodt TBD. 

1.0 Description

The Mallinckrodt Technical Basis Document (ORAUT-TKBS-0005) was first issued on 

10/23/2003. Since that time two revisions to the document have been approved. 

Revision 1 was approved on 3/10/2005 and revision 2 was approved on 6/14/2007. The 

last revision was made to address issues raised during a Special Exposure Cohort review 

of the TBD by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health. 

2.0 Issue Evaluation

The revisions to the Mallinckrodt TBD changed the Dose Reconstruction methodology 

for several exposure pathways. Some of the changes to the methodology will increase 

radiation dose estimates. The latest revision also eliminates some exposure pathways 

where it was determined that the dose could not be estimated with sufficient accuracy. A 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) status was granted to employees of Mallinckrodt in two 

separate steps. Due to the nature of some of the changes, the magnitude of the effect on 

individual dose estimates will vary from claim to claim. It is therefore, not possible to 

determine the effect on the Probability of Causation without a new dose estimate. 

3.0 Plan for Resolution or Corrective Action

It is not possible to determine the magnitude of the change to dose without a new dose 

estimate. Since (as of issuance of this PER) no Mallinckrodt claims have yet been 

completed with the newest revision to the TBD, NIOSH is requesting that all 

Mallinckrodt claims with a dose reconstruction performed using Revision 1 of ORAUTTKBS-0005 that have a Probability of Causation less than 50% be returned for a new 

estimate. A list of the population of 16 potentially affected claims is attached. A new 
Office of Compensation Analysis and Support

Document Number: OCAS-PER-015 Program Evaluation Plan 

Effective Date: 7/31/2007 Revision No. 0 Page 2 of 2 

dose reconstruction will be completed for each of the claims using the latest revision to 

the Mallinckrodt TBD.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TouchIT Technologies, Inc (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) I, Andrew Brabin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 24, 2010
By:
/s/ Andrew BrabinName: Andrew BrabinTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.19


 


October 13, 2015


 


Board of Director


Heyu Leisure Holiday
Corporation


Westwood Business Center


Grapevine, Texas 76051


 


Dear Board of Director,


 


The
purpose of this letter is to inform you of my resignation from my current position as Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)
with Heyu Leisure Holiday Corporation. My last day of work will be on Friday, 13 November, 2015.


 


I
would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere appreciation to Board of Director, as well as other colleagues at the
Heyu Group. It has been a great pleasure to work with you and wish Heyu Group continued success in all your endeavors.


 


Please let me know if
I can be of assistance in any way to help with a smooth transition.


 


Thank You.


 


	Yours faithfully,	 
	 	 
	/s/ Keith, Che Kean Tat	 
	Keith, Che Kean Tat
(No. 6063.

March 5, 1934.)

#### JAMES A. WAYNE, as President of COEUR D’ALENES LEAD COMPANY; ROGER W. GREENOUGH, as Secretary and Treasurer of Said COEUR D’ALENES LEAD COMPANY, and Said COEUR D’ALENES LEAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Respondents, v. HERMAN MARQUARDT and WALTER H. HANSON, Appellants.

[30 Pac. (2d) 369.]

Walter H. Hanson and F. C. Keane, for Appellants.

*212Gray & McNaughton and James A. Wayne, for Respondents.

WERNETTE, J.

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying appellants’ motion for new trial. Respondents, in their brief, raise the question of the failure of appellants to file their notice of, or motion for new trial within the ten-day period provided by sec. 7-604, I. C. A., which, in part, reads as follows:

“The party intending to move for a new trial must, within ten days after the verdict of the jury, if the action were tried by a jury, or after notice of the decision of the court or referee, if the action were tried without a jury, file with the clerk and serve upon the adverse party a notice of his motion.”

This action was tried to the district court sitting without a jury. The findings of fact, conclusions of law and decree of the district court were entered and filed January 27, 1933. Appellants did not file a notice of intention to move for a new trial, but did, on February 9, 1933, serve and file a motion for new trial. Thus neither a notice nor the motion was filed within the ten days provided by see. 7-604, I, C. A.

*213This court is without discretion in the premises. The granting of a new trial by the district court is entirely a matter of statute and if the moving party had not complied with the provisions of the statute, as in this case, the district court was without jurisdiction and properly ruled in denying the motion for new trial. *(Hess v. Swanson,*36 Ida. 135, 209 Pac. 721; *Brockman v. Hall,*37 Ida. 564, 218 Pac. 188.) The ten-day statutory period started running upon the filing of the findings of fact, conclusions of law and decree of the district court. *(Forsman v. Holbrook,*47 Ida. 241, 274 Pac. 111.)

Other assignments and grounds for dismissal, set forth by respondents, need not be considered for the noneompli-anee with the statute, above set forth, is jurisdictional in nature and, consequently, conclusive.

The order denying motion for new trial is affirmed.

Costs to respondents.

Budge, C. J., and Givens, Morgan and Holden, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 9368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-778]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notification of Item Added to Meeting 
Agenda

Date of Meeting: January 29, 2008.

Status: Closed.

Previous Announcement: 73 FR 3760, January 22, 2008.

Addition: 
    1. Consideration of Rate and Classification Changes.
    At its closed meeting on January 29, 2008, the Board of Governors 
of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to add this item 
to the agenda of its closed meeting and that no earlier announcement 
was possible. The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service 
certified that in her opinion discussion of this item could be properly 
closed to public observation.

Contact Person for More Information: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08-778 Filed 2-14-08; 4:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
---

Exhibit 99.9





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Minera Andes Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert R. McEwen, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.









Date:July 30, 2009

By:/s/  Robert R. McEwen



Robert R. McEwen

Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman







A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a- 14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Minera Andes, Inc. and will be retained by Minera Andes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.







---
**Exhibit 32**

**OVERSEAS PARTNERSLTD.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Overseas Partners Ltd. (“Company”) certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: August 13, 2003 |   |      |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------|
|                       |   | By:  | /s/ MARK R. BRIDGES |
|                  |   |      |  |
|                  |   |      | **Mark R. Bridges****Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer** |

 

|   |   |      |
|--------|--------|-----------|
|        |   | By:  | /s/ CHRIS FLEMING |
|   |   |      |  |
|   |   |      | **Chris Fleming****Chief Accounting Officer** |
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Wu Yongliang, Chief Financial Officer of China Eastern
Airlines Corporation Limited (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Company’s
annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) (i) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: April 25, 2016 |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                     |  |                               
|                     |  | /s/ Wu Yongliang              
|                     |  | Name: Wu Yongliang            
|                     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# FILED Au gust 13, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Ap pellate Cou rt Clerk 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE ALAN TATE, ) ) Plaintiff /Appella nt, )

) Davidson C ircuit ) No. 96C- 2809 VS. ) ) Appeal N o. ) 01A01-9703- CV-00156 STATE OF TENNESSEE ) BOARDOF PAROLES , and ) KEVIN MYE

RS, )

) Defenda nts/Appell ees. )



## O R D E R This is an appe al from t

h e dismissa

l of a pris oner’s co mmon-law writ of certiorari challengi ng the deci sion of the Tennessee Board of Paroles to deny his app l ication

for parol e. Aft

er revie wing the pa

rties’ br iefs and the entire record, we have determined that the October 17, 1996 Order of the Fif th Circuit C ourt for Davidson County should be affir

med in acc ordance w ith Tenn. Ct. App. R. 10(a). ENTE R, this ___

__ day of A

ugust, 1997.

_________________

_______________ HENRY F. TODD, P.J., M.S.

_________________

_______________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

_________________

_______________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1601 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1601

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude small rural 
 providers from the prospective payment system for hospital outpatient 
                          department services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 16, 1999

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude small rural 
 providers from the prospective payment system for hospital outpatient 
                          department services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Rural Provider Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF SMALL RURAL PROVIDERS FROM PPS FOR HOSPITAL 
              OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833(t)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395l(t)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``For purposes of 
        this'' and inserting ``Subject to subparagraph (C), for 
        purposes of this''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) Exclusion for services furnished by small rural 
        providers.--The term `covered OPD services' does not include 
        services furnished by a--
                    ``(i) medicare-dependent, small rural hospital, as 
                defined in section 1886(d)(5)(G)(iv);
                    ``(ii) a critical access hospital, as defined in 
                section 1861(mm)(1);
                    ``(iii) sole community hospital, as defined in 
                section 1886(d)(5)(D)(iii); or
                    ``(iv) a hospital (determined as of the date of 
                enactment of the Small Rural Provider Act of 1999) 
                that--
                            ``(I) has less than 50 beds; and
                            ``(II) performed less than 5,000 outpatient 
                        procedures during the 12-month period ending on 
                        such date;
        if such hospital, within the 180-day period beginning on the 
        date of enactment of the Small Rural Provider Act of 1999, 
        requests the Secretary to exclude services furnished by such 
        hospital from the prospective payment system established under 
        this subsection.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Balanced Budget Act 
of 1997.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN
NO. 03-00-00736-CR

Jose Flores, Appel

lant v. The State of Texas , Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167T H JUDICIAL DIST RICT NO. 0996449, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

A jury fou nd ap pellant Jo se Flo re s gu ilty of felonydr iving wh ile i ntoxi cated. SeeTe x. Penal Code An n. §§ 49.04( a), .09(b

) (We st Supp . 2001) . The di strict court assess ed puni shm ent at im prisonm ent for t wo years. Appellant’s co ur t - ap po int ed at t o rne y filed a b r ief c o nc lud ing t ha t t he ap pe al is fri volousan d w i th out m eri t. Th e br ief mee t s t he r eq uir eme nt s o f Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967 ), by presenti ng a profes si onal

evalua t ion o f the r ec o r d d emo nst r at ing wh y t he r e a r e n o ar gu ab le grounds to be ad

va nc ed. See also Pens on v. Ohio , 488 U.S . 75 (19 88) ; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 ( T ex . Cr im. App. 197 8); Curr ie v. State , 51 6 S. W.2d 684 (T ex. Cr im . App . 19 74) ; Jackson v. State , 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 197 2); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 19 69 ). A copy of cou n se l ’s b rief wa s del i v ered to appella

nt, and appel

la nt was advise d o f his right to exam in e the appel

la te recor d and to file

a pro se brie f. No pro se bri ef h as been fi le d.2 We have r eviewe d t he record and counsel ’s b rief and agree that the appeal

is fri volous an d w it ho ut mer it . We find no t hing in t he r ec o r d t ha t migh t ar gu ab ly su pp o r t t he ap pe al.

The j udgme

nt of convi

ction i s af fi rmed.

Mari ly n A boussie, Chief J

ustice Be f ore C hi ef Ju sti ceA bou ss i e, J us ti ce s Y ea

ke l an d Pa tters on Af fi rmed File d: August 30, 2001 Do No t Publis

h
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Minera Andes Inc. for the
year ended  December  31, 1999 and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             483,471
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       32,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   515,502
<PP&E>                                           3,811,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                     126,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,200,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              239,160
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        16,960,540
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12,999,237)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,200,463
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,766,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,766,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,766,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,766,517)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>