alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DAVIS SERIES, INC.
2949 East Elvira Road, Suite 101
Tucson, Arizona 85706
(520) 434-3771

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



KENNETH C. EICH, Principal Executive Officer, and SHARRA L. REED, Principal
Financial Officer of Davis Series, Inc. (the "Registrant"), each certify to
the best of his or her knowledge that:

(1) The Registrant's periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended
    June 30, 2004 (the "Form N-CSR") fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Registrant.

Principal Executive Officer                Principal Financial Officer

DAVIS SERIES, INC.                         DAVIS SERIES, INC.

/s/ Kenneth C. Eich                        /s/ Sharra L. Reed

Kenneth C. Eich                            Sharra L. Reed
Principal Executive Officer                Principal Financial Officer
Date:  September 9, 2004                   Date: September 9, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 has been provided to DAVIS SERIES, INC. and will
be retained by DAVIS SERIES, INC. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission") or its staff upon request.

This certification is being furnished to the Commission solely pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR filed
with the Commission.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 87 (Thursday, May 6, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24801-24802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10296]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

36 CFR Part 251


Special Uses

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final rule governing 
the Forest Service's Special Use Program that was published in the 
Federal Register on March 26, 2010 (75 FR 14495).

DATES: Effective on May 6, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julett Denton, Lands Special Uses 
Program Manager, (202) 205-1256.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    This correction adds paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) to Sec.  
251.60 (a)(2)(i) which were inadvertently removed from the final rule 
and which are necessary to reflect properly the Forest Service's 
authority to revoke or suspend special use authorizations under the 
Federal Land Policy and Management Act.

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 251

    Administrative practice and procedure, Electric power, National

[[Page 24802]]

forests, Public lands--rights-of-way, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Water resources.

0
Accordingly, 36 CFR part 251 is corrected to read as follows:

PART 251--LAND USES

Subpart B--Special Uses

0
1. The authority citation for part 251 continues to read as follow:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1011; 16 U.S.C. 518, 551, 678a; Pub. L. 76-
867, 54 Stat. 1197.


0
2. In Sec.  251.60, revise (a)(2)(i) to read as follows:


Sec.  251.60  Termination, revocation, and suspension.

    (a) * * *
    (2) All other special uses--(i) Revocation or suspension. An 
authorized officer may revoke or suspend a special use authorization 
for all other special uses, except a permit or an easement issued 
pursuant to Sec.  251.53(e) or an easement issued under Sec.  251.53(l) 
of this subpart:
    (A) For noncompliance with applicable statutes, regulations, or the 
terms and conditions of the authorization;
    (B) For failure of the holder to exercise the rights or privileges 
granted;
    (C) With the consent of the holder; or
    (D) At the discretion of the authorized officer for specific and 
compelling reasons in the public interest.
* * * * *

    Dated: April 28, 2010.
Thomas L. Tidwell,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-10296 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
NO. 07-08 -021 8-CR IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL C NO VEM BER24, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ MA RK AN THON YM AR TINEZ , Appel lan t v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 64 DIS T RI CT COU RT OF HA L E CO UNT Y; TH NO. A168 98-0 608 ; HON. ROBERT W . KINKAI D, JR., PRESIDING

_________

_________

_________

____ Anders Opinion

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRT LE, JJ. Ma rk Ant hony

M arti nez( appel lan t) appeal s h is co nv icti on fo r a gg ra v ated sex ual ass aul t of a c hil d. Pursuantto an ag re ement, he pled g uil ty to the o ff ense and w as g ra nted eig ht y ears deferred adjudi cat ion
. The Stat e subseq uentl y f il ed a moti on to proceed w it h the a dju dic ati on of hi s g uil t. Ital leg ed th at he had 1) used cocai ne w hil e on probati on, 2 ) faile d to make h is monthl y repor ts, 3) fail ed to c omplet e hi s c ommunity se rv ic e hours, 4) failed to atte nd AA/NA me etings as orde red, an d 5) failed to comp le t e a s e x of fend ersAppel l ant has t he r i ght t o f i l e a pr o se pet i t i on f or di scr et i onar y r ev i ew f r om t hi s opi ni on. 1 2 prog ra m. At t he hear ing , app ell ant p led tr ue to t h e a lle g ati ons cont ain ed i n the moti on. T h e t ri a l c o u rtt h e n fo u n d t h a tt h e a ll e ga t io n s we re t ru e , a d ju d ic a t e d a p p e ll a n tgu il t y, all ow ed oppo rt uni ty

to presentev ide nce re lat ing to puni shment , and se ntenc ed hi m to fifteen y ears i mpri sonment
. Appel lan t' s c ounse l has now mov ed to w it hdraw , after fil ing a br ief pursuantto And ers v. California , 386 U .S. 738, 87 S. Ct
. 1396, 18 L. Ed.2d 493 ( 1967) and re present ing that he has se ar ched the record and found no arg uabl e g ro unds for rev ersal
. The moti on and brief ill ustrat e tha t coun sel not if ied ap pellan t of his rig ht to rev iew the ap pellat e record a n d f il e h is o wn b ri e f

o r r e s p o n s e . So t o o d id we in fo rm a p p e ll a n tt h a ta n y pro se respon se or br ief he cared to fil e had to be fil ed by N ov ember

12, 2008. T o date, appe ll ant h as faile d to file a respon se. In compl ian ce w it h Ander s, appel lat e couns el address ed one pot enti al g ro und for appeal and ex pla ine d w hy i t w as basel ess . W e, l ik e appel lat e c ounse l, al so re v iew ed th e re cord to deter mine w hether there ex is ted rev ersi ble er ro r and found non e. See Staff ord v. State , 813 S.W .2d 5 03, 5 11 ( Tex . C ri m. App. 1991) ( re q uir ing us to condu ct an inde pen den t rev iew ). Acc ordin g ly , w e g ra nt c ounse l' s moti on to w it hdraw and affirm the j udg ment of the tr ial co urt. 1 Br ian Qui nn C hie f Just ic e Do not p ubl is h.
---

Exhibit 99.13

CONSENT

We hereby consent to the use in Minera Andes Inc.s annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 of the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report in Support of the Preliminary Assessment on the Development of the Los Azules Project, San Juan Province, Argentina issued by Samuel Engineering, Inc.  for Minera Andes Inc. dated March 19, 2009.

|                     |  |                                | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | 
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  | RANDOLPH P. SCHNEIDER        | 
|                     |  | Randolph P. Schneider, MAusIMM | 
|                     |  |                                | 
|                     |  | ROBERT SIM                   | 
|                     |  | Robert Sim, P.Geo              | 
|                     |  |                                | 
|                     |  | BRUCE M. DAVIS               | 
|                     |  | Bruce M. Davis, Ph.D., FAusIMM | 
|                     |  |                                | 
|                     |  | WILLIAM L. ROSE              | 
|                     |  | William L. Rose, P.E.          | 
|                     |  |                                | 
|                     |  | SCOTT C. ELFEN               | 
|                     |  | Scott C. Elfen, P.E.           | 







---
---

---

Exhibit 15

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTRERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-10008, No.
333-13770, No. 333-152206 and No. 333-158057), Form F-3/A (No. 333-116044 and No.
333-133330), Form F-3/A (No. 333-148504) and Form F-3 (No. 333-150015) of our reports dated
March 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of BluePhoenix
Solutions Ltd. included in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A.

| |  | By: /s/ Ziv Haft
Ziv HaftCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)BDO Member Firm
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel-Aviv, IsraelNovember 24, 2009



---

---
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 7 8 9 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. E N R I Q U E G O M E Z

- R O D R I G U E Z , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 7 : 0 8

- C R

- 8 8 6

- 3

B e f o r e D E N N I S , C L E M E N T , a n d E L R O D , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
E n r i q u e G o m e z - R o d r i g u e z p l e a d e d g u i l t y t o c o n s p i r a c y t o p o s s e s s w i t h i n t e n t t o d i s t r i b u t e c o c a i n e a n d w a s s e n t e n c e d t o a 9 0

- m o n t h p r i s o n t e r m
. J u d g m e n t w a s e n t e r e d o n J a n u a r y 7 , 2 0 1 0 , a n d h i s u n d a t e d n o t i c e o f a p p e a l w a s f i l e d i n t h e r e c o r d o n A u g u s t 1 3 , 2 0 1 0

. G o m e z - R o d r i g u e z ’ s n o t i c e o f a p p e a l w a s f i l e d m o r e t h a n s e v e n m o n t h s a f t e r t h e f i n a l j u d g m e n t w a s e n t e r e d a n d b e y o n d
t h e t i m e f

o r e x t e n d i n g t h e a p p e a l p e r i o d u n d e r F e d e r a l R u l e o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e 4 ( b ) ( 4 )

. S e e F E D

. R

. A P P

. P

. 4 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( A ) ( i ) , ( b ) ( 4 )

. G o m e z - R o d r i g u e z d i d U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 22 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40789 Document: 00511517374 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2011N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 7 8 9

n o t f i l e a t i m e l y n o t i c e o f a p p e a l , a n d h e h a s n o t a s s e r t e d a n y g r o u n d f o r

e x c u s a b l e n e g l e c t

. T h e r e f o r e , h i s a p p e a l i s D I S M I S S E D a s u n t i m e l y
. S e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. L e i

j a n o - C r u z , 4 7 3 F

. 3 d 5 7 1 , 5 7 4 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 6 )

. A c c o r d i n g l y , h i s

m o t i o n s f

o r a p p o i n t m e n t o f c o u n s e l a n d t o p r o c e e d i n f o r m a p a u p e r i s o n a p p e a l

a r e D E N I E D A S M O O T

.

2 Case: 10-40789 Document: 00511517374 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2011
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,505-01

EX P ARTE JAMES ANTHONY GAR NER, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 20866B IN THE 104 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Te x . C ri m . App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated assault and sentenc ed to e ight y ear s’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appea ls dismissed his appea l. Garner v. State , No. 11-18-0019- CR (Tex. App.—Eastland Fe b. 15, 2018)(not desig nated for publication). Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance by informing him that he would g et probation and by failingto present e vidence for his def ense. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington ,2

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial coun s el t o respond to Applicant’s claim of i neff ective assistance of counsel. The trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hear ing, it sha ll de termine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall ap p o i nt an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t an d conclusions of law as to whether the perf ormanc e of Applicant’s trial counsel was defic ient and, if so , wh et her counsel’s defic ient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fact and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus re lief. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be re s o l v ed wi t h in 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court. Filed: June 20, 2018 Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40227

Summary Calendar

STEVEN DAVID MONTAGUE,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

JOHN B. FOX, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CV-776

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Steven David Montague, federal prisoner # 10601-081, was convicted of

several counts of possession of a firearm by a felon and of possession of a

controlled substance. He appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition challenging the Bureau of Prisons’s (BOP) method of calculating

his good conduct time (GCT) credit under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b).

In Sample v. Morrison, 406 F.3d 310, 312 (5th Cir. 2005), we held that,

where the prisoner was not claiming he was immediately eligible for release, we

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 1, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40227 Document: 00511251219 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/01/2010
No. 10-40227

lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal of his § 2241 petition

challenging the BOP’s calculation of GCT credit under § 3624(b). We concluded

that the petition was not ripe because the prisoner had not established that he

would sustain immediate injury that could be redressed by the relief requested.

Id.

Montague requests the same relief as the petitioner in Sample. However,

whether Montague’s projected release date is computed on the basis of the BOP’s

interpretation or his own, he is not yet entitled to release. Thus, like the

petitioner in Sample, Montague’s petition is not ripe for review, and the instant

appeal is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Sample, 406 F.3d

at 312. Moreover, even if Montague’s request for relief were not premature, his

argument is foreclosed. See Barber v. Thomas, 130 S. Ct. 2499, 2504 (2010);

Moreland v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 431 F.3d 180, 186 (5th Cir. 2005).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

2

Case: 10-40227 Document: 00511251219 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/01/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF GENERAL CIGAR  HOLDINGS,  INC.
INCLUDED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED  NOVEMBER 27, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0001029456
<NAME>                             GENERAL CIGAR HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  NOV-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       NOV-27-1999
<CASH>                                 111,932
<SECURITIES>                            12,751
<RECEIVABLES>                           31,835
<ALLOWANCES>                               808
<INVENTORY>                            137,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       305,867
<PP&E>                                 108,873
<DEPRECIATION>                          48,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         445,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   28,112
<BONDS>                                 10,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   278
<OTHER-SE>                             320,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           445,170
<SALES>                                182,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       182,266
<CGS>                                   96,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           96,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           459
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        170,084
<INCOME-TAX>                            63,522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    106,562
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           106,562
<EPS-BASIC>                               4.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                             3.92


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BELAFONTE LOPEZ ROSIER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3047 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 21, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Frederick R. Hardt, Judge. Belafonte Lopez Rosier, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); State v. TemplarO'Brien, 173 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); State v. Burgess, 153 So. 3d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Doby v. State, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Rosier v. State, 939 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (table decision); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 884 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002);Williams v. State, 452 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Gary v. State, 5 So. 3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Jones- 2 -

v. State, 907 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Sequoia v. State, 678 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 83 (Friday, April 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 22816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Revitalizing Core Environmental Health Programs Through 
the Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net) Research (U01), 
Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) EH10-001, Initial Review

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Times and Dates: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., May 20, 2010 (Closed). 8 a.m.-5 
p.m., May 21, 2010 (Closed).
    Place: JW Marriott Hotel Buckhead, 3300 Lenox Road, Atlanta, GA 
30326, Telephone (404) 262-3344.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5, 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Section 10(d) of Public Law 
92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Revitalizing Core Environmental Health Programs 
through the EHS-Net Research (U01), FOA EH10-001.''
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person For More Information: J. Felix Rogers, PhD, 
M.P.H., NCIPC/ERPO, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., M/S F62, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30341-3724, Telephone (770) 488-4334.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 26, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-10164 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P