alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_10hhh.htm



Exhibit 10 hhh



 


Third Amendment to PROMISSORY NOTE


 


June 29, 2015


 


On December 28, 2008, CEL-SCI Corporation (the “Company”) issued a promissory note (the “Note”) to Maximilian de Clara or order (the “Holder”).  On April 30, 2009 the Company signed a 1st Amendment to the Note due to the Company’s inability to repay the Note.  On July 6, 2009 a 2nd Amendment to the Note was signed.  On August 22, 2011, the Note was amended for the third time and restated.  In August 2014 the Note was transferred to the de Clara Trust.  The parties agree to further amend the Note as follows:


 



	
1)  

	
Effective July 7, 2015, interest on the Note will be at an annual rate of 9% and will be payable monthly.







 



	
2)  

	
The maturity date of the Note is extended to July 6, 2017.







 



	
3)  

	
The Note, in whole or in part, will be convertible at the Holder’s option into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.59 per share, subject to the customary adjustments.  The Company agrees to deliver the shares within 3 trading days of a conversion notice.







 


All other terms and conditions of said Note shall remain in full force and effect.







AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED as of June 29, 2015:







CEL-SCI CORPORATION







By: /s/ Patricia B. Prichep


Patricia B. Prichep                                      


Senior Vice President of Operations


 






  





  











  








 


Fourth Amendment to PROMISSORY NOTE


 


October 11, 2015


 


On December 28, 2008, CEL-SCI Corporation (the “Company”) issued a promissory note (the “Note”) to Maximilian de Clara or order (the “Holder”).  On April 30, 2009 the Company signed a 1st Amendment to the Note due to the Company’s inability to repay the Note.  On July 6, 2009 a 2nd Amendment to the Note was signed.  On August 22, 2011, the Note was amended for the third time and restated.  In August 2014 the Note was transferred to the de Clara Trust.  On June 29. 2015 the 3rd amendment to the Note was signed.  The parties agree to further amend the Note as follows:


 



	
1)  

	
The maturity date of the Note is extended to July 6, 2018.







 


All other terms and conditions of said Note shall remain in full force and effect.







AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED as of October 11, 2015:







CEL-SCI CORPORATION







By: /s/ Patricia B. Prichep


Patricia B. Prichep                                      


Senior Vice President of Operations


 


 


DE CLARA TRUST (Dtd 6-13-14)


 


By: /s/ Geert Kersten Geert Kersten


Trustee
Exhibit 32.01








STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Form 10-Q) of 1st Financial Services Corporation (the Company), we, Michael G. Mayer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Holly L. Schreiber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify to our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)           the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b)           the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.






By:
/s/ Michael G. MayerMichael G. MayerChief Executive Officer








By:
/s/Holly L. SchreiberHolly L. SchreiberChief Financial Officer
 
  This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 171 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 172 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 173 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v. :

:

:

:

:

: No. 174 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court[ 171 EAL 2023, 172 EAL 2023, 173 EAL 2023, 174 EAL 2023, 175 EAL 2023, 176 EAL

2023, 177 EAL 2023, 178 EAL 2023 and 179 EAL 2023 ]

- 2 CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 175 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 176 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 177 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent :

:

:

: No. 178 EAL 2023[ 171 EAL 2023, 172 EAL 2023, 173 EAL 2023, 174 EAL 2023, 175 EAL 2023, 176 EAL

2023, 177 EAL 2023, 178 EAL 2023 and 179 EAL 2023 ]

- 3 v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 179 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of September, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**Exhibit 99.20**

 

**CONSENT OF ROBERT SIM**

 

I hereby consent to the use of my name and the name of my company inconnection with the following, which are being reference in the annual reporton Form 40-F of Minera Andes Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the UnitedStates Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

1.               The technicalreport titled “Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report in Supportof the Preliminary Assessment on the Development of the Los Azules Project, SanJuan Province, Argentina”, with an effective date of March 19, 2009 (the “LosAzules Report”);

 

2.               The current mineralresource estimates of the Los Azules project; and

 

3.               The annualinformation form of the Company dated March 30, 2010 which includesreference to my name and company name in connection with information relatingto the Los Azules Project and the Los Azules Report.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2010 |                          |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                      | “Signed” Robert Sim |
|                      | Robert Sim, P.Geo             |
|                      | President                     |
|                      | Sim Geological Inc.           |

 

----
# NIOSH OEP Awards

List of Active NIOSH Extramural Awards	NIOSH / OEP1-OCT-2017

Page: &P of &N	

# Acronym Glossary
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

Phone: 513-533-6825 

 Fax: 513-533-6826 

 June 6, 2011 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00107 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Linde Ceramics Plant in Tonawanda, NY, as an addition to the Special 

Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000. On April 21, 2011, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS 

designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked at the Linde Ceramics Plant in Tonawanda, 

New York, from January 1, 1954 through December 31, 1969, for a number of work days 

aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in 

combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes 

of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on May 21, 2011, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on May 21, 2011, members of this class of employees, defined as 

reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

 Sincerely, 

[Signature on File]

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CurrencyShares Russian Ruble Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joe Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.

Date: September 9, 2009

|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/ Joe Arruda               
|Joe Arruda*                  
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Joe Arruda is
signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 3, 2016

jam 

# Order

Clerk May 3, 2016

1 53202

IN RE SCHMIDT

__________________________________ JAMES EDWARD SCHMIDT

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 53202

CoA: 329703

KALKASKA CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

,

Defendant

- Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff

- appellant having failed to

acknowledge an obligation to pay the $375.00 filing fee in installments as required by the

order of March 25, 2016 , the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1540 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1540

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to correct the inadvertent 
 failure in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to apply the exception for 
     developable sites to Round I Empowerment Zones and Enterprise 
                              Communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 1999

  Mr. Johnson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to correct the inadvertent 
 failure in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to apply the exception for 
     developable sites to Round I Empowerment Zones and Enterprise 
                              Communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF DEVELOPABLE SITE OPPORTUNITIES TO ROUND I 
              EMPOWERMENT ZONES AND ENTERPRISE COMMUNITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1392(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to poverty rate) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively,
            (2) by striking ``The poverty rate--'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--The poverty rate--'', and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Exception for developable sites.--
                Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to up to 3 
                noncontiguous parcels in a nominated area which may be 
                developed for commercial or industrial purposes. The 
                aggregate area of noncontiguous parcels to which the 
                preceding sentence applies with respect to any 
                nominated area shall not exceed 2,000 acres.''
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1391(g)(3)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking clause (iii) and by 
redesignating clauses (iv) and (v) as clauses (iii) and (iv), 
respectively.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect with respect to designations made before, on, and after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1503

AN ACT

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C.

App.) to extend the authorization of appropriations for

the Office of Government Ethics through fiscal year

2003.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Office of Government

5 Ethics Authorization Act of 1999’’.
2

S 1503 ES

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA2 TIONS.

3 Section 405 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978

4 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking ‘‘1997 thorough

5 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘2000 through 2003’’.

6 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

7 This Act shall take effect on October 1, 1999.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1503

AN ACT

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978

(5 U.S.C. App.) to extend the authorization ofappropriations for the Office of Government Ethics through fiscal year 2003.
**Exhibit 99.12**

 

**CONSENT OF KIRSTINE MALLOCH**

 

I hereby consent to the use of my name and the name of my company in connection with the following, which are being reference in the annual report on Form 40-F of Minera Andes Inc. (the “**Company**”) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

1.               The technical report dated December 22, 2010 entitled “Technical Report on the San José Silver-Gold Mine, Santa Cruz, Argentina” (the “**San José Report**”);

 

2.               The current mineral resource and reserve estimates of the San José Silver-Gold Mine; and

 

3.               The annual information form of the Company dated March 28th, 2011, which includes reference to my name and company name in connection with information relating to the San José Report and the San José Silver-Gold Mine.

 

 
| Date: March 30th, 2011 |                                  |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                        | “Signed” Kirstine   Malloch |
|                        | Kirstine Malloch,   MAusIMM           |
|                        | Independent   Geological Consultant   |
|                        | P&E Mining   Consultants Inc.     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          133562                  133562
<SECURITIES>                                    426708                  426708
<RECEIVABLES>                                   139170                  139170
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3025                    3025
<INVENTORY>                                      14883                   14883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                733851                  733851
<PP&E>                                          334329                  334329
<DEPRECIATION>                                  174473                  174473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1017647                 1017647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           255857                  255857
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         68553                   68553
<OTHER-SE>                                      594646                  594646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1017647                 1017647
<SALES>                                         216147                  580105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                216147                  580105
<CGS>                                           152882                  411027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   165998                  483885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   355                    1160
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1484                    8628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  55670                  105341
<INCOME-TAX>                                     20086                   43359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              35584                   61982
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     35584                   61982
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.17                    0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17                    0.30


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NOBLE DRILLING HOLDING , L.L.C. , Defendant Below

Appellant,

v. DAVID CARNES , Plaintiff Below

Appellee. § § § No. 208, 2017 § § § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. N15 C

- 11

- 18 2 § §
Submitted: June 13, 2017 Decide d: June 19 , 2017
Before ST RINE , Chief Justice, VALIHURA and VAUGHN , Justices.
O R D E R
This 19 th d ay of June 2017 , upon consideration of the notice of interlocutory appeal and the supplemental notice of interlocutory appeal , it appears to the Court
that: (1) The defendant

- appellant , Noble Drilling Holding, LLC (“Noble Drilling ”) , is a Delaware corporation. Noble Drilling has petitioned this Court under Supreme Court Rule 42 to accept an interlocutory appeal from a memorandum opinion of the Superior Court dated April 27, 2017 (“the Memorandum Opinion”).
T he Memorandum Opinion denied Noble Drilling’s motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings , finding that t he com plaint alleged sufficient facts to invoke the Superior Court’s maritime jurisdiction under traditional admiralty2

principles and, alternatively, that whether the court had jurisdiction under the Admiralty Extension Act required resolution of factual issues that were inappropriate on a motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings. (2) Noble Drilling filed an application for certification to take an interlocutory appeal of the Memorandum Opinion in the Superior Court on May 8,
2017

. The plaintiff

- appellee, David Carnes, filed his response in opposition on May 18, 2017

. (3) T he Superior Court denied the certification application on June 6, 2017

. In denying certification, the Superior Court noted that the Memorandum Opinion did not, as Noble Drilling argued, sustain the trial court’s controverted jurisdiction, but instead had rejected Noble Drilling’s argument that the complaint failed to state
a claim. Even if the Memorandum Opinion had sustained the trial court’s controverted juris diction , the Superior Court held that certification was not
warranted because the case is not exceptional , and the potential benefits of interlocutory review do not outweigh the inefficiency, disruption, and probable costs caused by an interlocutory appeal

. ( 4 ) We agree that interlocutory review is not warranted in this case

. Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court. In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the application3

for interlocutory review does not meet the strict standards for certification under Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused

. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within interlocutory appeal is REFUSED

. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2016

No. 04-15-00473-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE—Division of Workers’ Compensation and 

Commissioner Ryan Brannan, in his official capacity,

Appellants

v.

Dale BRUMFIELD,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-07374

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Appellee’s motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing en banc is 

GRANTED. The motion is due on August 1, 2016.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Lendon M. Duke

, * From the 106th District

Court of Dawson County,

Trial Court No. 12

- 7173

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00 284

- CR * April 4, 2013

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal should be

dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court = s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.