alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.21**

 

**CONSENT OF BRUCE C. DAVIS**

 

I hereby consent to the use of my name and the name of my company inconnection with the following, which are being reference in the annual reporton Form 40-F of Minera Andes Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with theUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

1.               The technicalreport titled “Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report in Supportof the Preliminary Assessment on the Development of the Los Azules Project, SanJuan Province, Argentina”, with an effective date of March 19, 2009 (the “LosAzules Report”);

 

2.               The current mineralresource estimates of the Los Azules project; and

 

3.               The annualinformation form of the Company dated March 30, 2010 which includesreference to my name and company name in connection with information relatingto the Los Azules Project and the Los Azules Report.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2010 |                              |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                      | “Signed” Bruce C. Davis |
|                      | Bruce M. Davis                    |
|                      | President                         |
|                      | BD Resource Consulting, Inc.      |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1





Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Charles Adelman, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Adelman Enterprises, Inc.;





2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal  controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.





May 16, 2011
By:Charles AdelmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyber Supply Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Maria Shostak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of January, 2009.



| | MARIA SHOSTAK                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Maria Shostak,                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6306

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HARRY REID LIVERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CR-94-2, CR-97-53)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 2, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Reid Livers, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Harry Reid Livers seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Livers, Nos. CR-94-2;

CR-97-53 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2000). We deny Livers’ motion for bail.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50202

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GREG MEDRANO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-00-CR-315-22

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Justin W. Low, who was appointed to represent Greg Medrano

in this direct criminal appeal, has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Medrano has not filed a response to Low’s

brief. Our independent review of the record and Low’s brief

shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. 

Accordingly, Low’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
No. 02-50202

-2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Brand
Neue Corp. (the “Company”) for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Adi Muljo,
Chief Executive Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:
August 17, 2009








ADI
MULJO


Adi
Muljo


Chief
Executive Officer


and
Director











-1-
Exhibit32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
onForm10-Q for the period endedOctober31, 2009 of the MacroShares Major Metro
Housing Up Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "QuarterlyReport"), I, Samuel Masucci, III, principal
executive officer of MacroShares HousingDepositor, LLC, which acts as the
depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.
            The Quarterly Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
            The information contained in the
      Quarterly Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.






Date:December 15, 2009




By:
            /s/SamuelMasucci,
      iiiSamuel Masucci,
      III
              Chief Executive Officer of
      Depositor,
              on behalf of
      Registrant
Statement Re:  Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Year Ended December 31,
                                                                 --------------------------------------------------
                                                                    1996               1995               1994
                                                                 --------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                              <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Average shares outstanding                                       10,951,823          8,476,126           6,555,441


Adjustments for issuance of common stock and other
 instruments within one year of the initial filing of the
 registration statement:


     Common stock issued                                                                                   203,533
     Common stock options granted                                                       82,445             333,455
     Common stock issuable upon conversion
      of preferred stock issued                                                        426,470           1,705,882
     Common stock issuable upon conversion
      of preferred options granted                                                     118,464             473,855
                                                                 ----------          ---------           ---------

Weighted average shares used in calculating per share data       10,951,823          9,103,505           9,272,166


Net loss attributable to common stockholders                    (28,565,075)       (26,915,178) (b)     (7,964,918) (a)


Net loss per common share                                             (2.62)            ($3.07)             ($0.86)
</TABLE>

(a) Adjusted to add back the preferred stock dividend based
upon assumed conversion of preferred stock to common stock
issued within one year of filing for an initial public offering.

(b) Assuming conversion of preferred stock and options and the
add back of preferred stock dividend for the period ended March 31, 1995.
Marina 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00310-CV

Enrique LOPEZ, d/b/a Maternidad La Piedad,

Appellant

v.

Marina Edith OSUNA, Individually and as next friend for Sarai Edith Gonzalez and Benito 

Gonzalez Cantu,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-10-28869-MCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's motion to extend time to file notice of appeal is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6050 

To allow all individuals purchasing health insurance in the individual market 

the option to purchase a lower premium copper plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2018 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To allow all individuals purchasing health insurance in the 

individual market the option to purchase a lower premium copper plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increasing Access to 

5 Care Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6050 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWING ALL INDIVIDUALS PURCHASING HEALTH 

2 INSURANCE IN THE INDIVIDUAL MARKET 

3 THE OPTION TO PURCHASE A LOWER PRE4 MIUM COPPER PLAN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1302(e) of the Patient 

6 Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(e)) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

9 (A) by redesignating clauses (i) and (ii) of 

10 subparagraph (B) as subparagraphs (A) and 

11 (B), respectively, and adjusting the margins ac12 cordingly; 

13 (B) by striking ‘‘plan year if—’’ and all 

14 that follows through ‘‘the plan provides—’’ and 

15 inserting ‘‘plan year if the plan provides—’’; 

16 and 

17 (C) in subparagraph (A), as so redesig18 nated, by striking ‘‘clause (ii)’’ and inserting 

19 ‘‘subparagraph (B)’’; 

20 (2) by striking paragraph (2); and 

21 (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para22 graph (2). 

23 (b) RISK POOLS.—Section 1312(c)(1) of the Patient 

24 Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

25 18032(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and including enVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:53 Jun 12, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6050.IH H6050

dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6050 IH

1 rollees in catastrophic plans described in section 1302(e)’’ 

2 after ‘‘Exchange’’. 

3 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

4 1312(d)(3)(C) of the Patient Protection and Affordable 

5 Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(d)(3)(C)) is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘, except that in the case of a catastrophic plan de7 scribed in section 1302(e), a qualified individual may en8 roll in the plan only if the individual is eligible to enroll 

9 in the plan under section 1302(e)(2)’’. 

10 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply with respect to plan years begin12 ning on or after January 1, 2019. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 3466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1038]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 4, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Richard T. Alger, the Richard T. Alger Revocable Trust, Richard 
T. Alger, trustee, and the Mason W. Alger and Dorothy Turner Alger 
Irrevocable Trust for Thomas M. Alger, Richard T. Alger, trustee, all 
of Homestead, Florida; to acquire voting shares of Hometown of 
Homestead Banking Company, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares 
of 1st National Bank of South Florida, both of Homestead, Florida.
    2. William Hall Losner, Homestead, Florida; to acquire voting 
shares of Hometown of Homestead Banking Company, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of 1st National Bank of South Florida, both of 
Homestead, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. A.C. Schwethelm, Comfort, Texas; to retain voting shares of, and 
acquire additional shares of Paint Rock Bancshares, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of, and acquire additional voting 
shares of First State Bank, both of Paint Rock, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 15, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-1038 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1489

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment to

States of plot allowances for certain veterans eligible for burial in a

national cemetery who are buried in cemeteries of such States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 4, 1999

Mr. BIDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the

payment to States of plot allowances for certain veterans

eligible for burial in a national cemetery who are buried

in cemeteries of such States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF PLOT OR INTERMENT ALLOW4 ANCE.

5 Section 2303 of title 38, United States Code, is

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 section;
2

•S 1489 IS

1 ‘‘(c)(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary shall

2 pay to any State, or agency or political subdivision of a

3 State, a plot or interment allowance of $150 for the burial

4 of any veteran who—

5 ‘‘(A) is eligible for burial in a national cemetery

6 under section 2402 of this title; and

7 ‘‘(B) is buried (without charge for the cost of

8 a plot or interment) in a cemetery, or a section of

9 a cemetery, that—

10 ‘‘(i) is used solely for the interment of per11 sons eligible for burial in a national cemetery;

12 and

13 ‘‘(ii) is owned by such State, or agency or

14 political subdivision.

15 ‘‘(2) The payment of a plot or interment allowance

16 under this subsection shall be in addition to any benefits

17 provided under section 2302 or 2307 of this title, or sub18 section (a).

19 ‘‘(3) The Secretary may not pay a plot or interment

20 allowance under this subsection for the burial of any vet21 eran for which the Secretary pays a plot or interment al22 lowance under subsection (b)(1).’’.

Æ
Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support

Program Evaluation Report

Document Number: DCAS-PER-089 

Effective Date: 10/17/2018 

Bliss and Laughlin Steel, Appendix D Rev 01 Page 1 of 2

Author: 

 Dave Allen, HP Team Leader

 Signature on file Date: 10/17/2018 Supersedes: none 

Approval: 

 J. W. Neton, Associate Director for Science

 Signature on file Date: 10/17/2018 

RECORD OF ISSUE/REVISIONS

ISSUE 

AUTHORIZATION 

DATE

EFFECTIVE

DATE

DESCRIPTION

10/17/2018 10/17/2018 New document to determine the effect of 

revising Battelle-TBD-6000 Appendix D 

(Bliss and Laughlin Steel) on previously 

completed claims.

1.0 Description

A Site Profile for Bliss and Laughlin Steel (Battelle-TBD-6000, Appendix D) was issued 

on 9/4/2012. Prior to that, dose reconstructions utilized methods found in the TBD-6000 

or ORAUT-OTIB-0004. A Program Evaluation Report (DCAS-PER-050) was issued on 

3/13/2014 evaluating the effect of issuing this document on previously completed claims. 

On 5/18/2017, revision 1 of Appendix D was issued. The effect of revision 1 on 

previously completed claims is the subject of this PER.

2.0 Issue Evaluation 

In revision 1, ingestion intakes were revised to correct an error. This resulted in ingestion 

intakes increasing each year of the operational and residual period. External dose from 

contamination changed due to a revision to the conversion factors in TBD-6000. This 

resulted in a decrease in photon dose but an increase in non-penetrating doses assigned 

during the residual period. Since ingestion intakes increased each year, all claims with 

Bliss and Laughlin employment completed before revision 1 will be considered. 
Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support

Program Evaluation Report

Document Number: DCAS-PER-089 

Effective Date: 10/17/2018 Page 2 of 2

3.0 Plan for Resolving Corrective Action 

A search of the NIOSH Claims Tracking System (NOCTS) database identified 38 claims 

with Bliss and Laughlin employment and a probability of causation (POC) below 50%. 

One of those claims was completed using revision 1 of Appendix D so it was removed 

from further consideration in this PER. Also, during the evaluations, the Department of 

Labor returned one claim to NIOSH for a new dose reconstruction. Since revision 1 of 

Appendix D was used to complete a new dose reconstruction for this claim, the claim was 

removed from further consideration in this PER. 

Doses for the remaining 36 claims were recalculated using revision 1 of Appendix D as 

well as all other applicable procedures. All 36 claims resulted in a new POC below 45%. 

NIOSH will provide the Department of Labor with the list of all the claims evaluated 

under this PER. Since none resulted in a probability of causation greater than 50%, 

NIOSH will not request the return of any claims.