alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N E D / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AN AI DA GA L US T I AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 70613 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 742- 529 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A na i daG a l us t i a n, ana t i ve of the f orm e rS ovi e tU ni on a nd ac i t i z e n of G eorgi a, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on denyi ng her 

# FI LED DE C 28 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN ED / Res ea r ch 07- 70613 2 appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e , W a n gv . I NS , 35 2 F . 3d 12 50 , 12 53 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) , a n dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e f o r e n s ic e x p e rt’s te s tim o n ya n dr e p o rt p r o v id e s ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e to s up p o rt th e a g e n c y ’s f

in d in g th a t G a lu s tian s ub m itte daf a ls e d r iv e r ’s lic e n s e . See D es ta v . A s h c r o

ft , 365 F . 3d 741, 745 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . B e c aus e the ge nui ne ne s s of thi s i dent i ty docum entw entt o the heartof G al ust i an’ s a sy l um cl ai m , subst ant i al e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n . Se e i d. ; see a l so Fa ra h v . A s h c r o

ft , 34 8 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ) ( char ac t er i zi ng i dent i ty a s a keyel em entof an as ylum cl ai m ). In the abse nce of cr edi bl e e vi dence, G al ust i an f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te e lig ib ilityf o ra s y lu m o rw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. Se e Farah , 3 4 8 F .3 da t 1 1 5 6 .. G a l us t i a n ha s f

a i l e d t o s e tf

orth a nys ubs t a nt i ve a r gum e ntr e ga r di ng the a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f

C A T r e lie f

. Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 (9th C i r. 19 96 ) ( i ss ues notsupp ort ed by ar gu m entar e dee m ed w ai ved). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Foreign Agricultural Service

# AGENCY:

Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice.

The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), today accepted a petition, and began a review of a petition, for trade adjustment assistance by the Catfish Farmers of America on behalf of U.S. farm-raised catfish producers. The Administrator will determine within 40 days whether or not increasing imports of catfish contributed importantly to a greater than 15 percent decrease in the national average price of catfish compared to the average of the 3 preceding marketing years. If a determination is affirmative, U.S. producers who produce and market farm-raised catfish will be eligible to apply to the Farm Service Agency for technical assistance at no cost and cash benefits.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Trade Adjustment Assistance Staff, FAS, USDA, at (202) 720-0638, or by e-mail at:                         *tradeadjustment@fas.usda.gov.*                         Additional program information can be obtained at the Web site for the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers program. The URL is                         *http://www.fas.usda.gov/​itp/​taa.*

Dated: April 27, 2010.

John D. Brewer,

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-10267 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
|   | Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------|--------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending March 31, 2009 of Teen Glow Makeup, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Pamela Hutchinson, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.            Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

/s/ Pamela Hutchinson

Pamela Hutchinson

 

President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and sole Director

 

Dated: May 26, 2009
CERTIFICATIONS I, Jay Lutsky, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tiger Acquisitions, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: (a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 13, 2008 /s/ Jay LutskyJay Lutsky, Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.  2-04-151-CV

TRISH RUDDER	APPELLANT

	V.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Trish Rudder attempts to appeal from a trial court order dissolving a temporary restraining order and denying temporary injunctive relief.  Appellee Washington Mutual Bank filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, asserting that appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.  

	On May 21, 2004, this court informed appellant that it was concerned it may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was untimely filed and that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal.  No response has been filed.  

	A party may appeal from an interlocutory order that refuses a temporary injunction.  Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(4) (Vernon Supp. 2004).  The trial court’s order was signed April 16, 2004.  No post-judgment motion was filed to extend the appellate deadline, so appellant’s notice of appeal was due May 6, 2004, but was not filed until May 17, 2004.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b).

	The times for filing a notice of appeal are jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal or an extension request, we must dismiss the appeal.  See id. 2, 25.1(b), 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (holding once extension period has passed, a party can no longer invoke an appellate court’s jurisdiction).  Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 8, 2004
EXHIBIT 21

                          GENERAL CIGAR HOLDINGS, INC.
                                   Delaware

                                                     State/Jurisdiction
   Subsidiaries (1)                                  of Incorporation
---------------------                                ------------------

General Cigar Co., Inc. (2)                          Delaware
387 PAS Corp.                                        New York
Club Macanudo, Inc.                                  New York
Culbro Tobacco, Inc.                                 Delaware
Club Macanudo (Chicago), Inc.                        Illinois

(1) The Company also has several inactive subsidiaries which considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company include the accounts of all
subsidiaries of the Company.

(2) Includes approximately 8 subsidiaries and 4 operating divisions through
which it carries on its cigar growing, manufacturing and distribution
businesses, and approximately 12 registered assumed or fictitious names used in
its business.
EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                        STATE OR OTHER           PERCENTAGE
PARENT                                                        JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION      OWNERSHIP
------                                                        -----------------------------      ----------

<S>                                                                       <C>                    <C>
HCB Bancshares, Inc.                                                      Oklahoma



Subsidiaries (1)
----------------

HEARTLAND Community Bank                                                 United States               100%

Subsidiary of HEARTLAND Community Bank
--------------------------------------

HCB Properties, Inc.                                                       Arkansas                  100%
<FN>

---------
(1)      The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included
         in the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 hereof.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Please keep in mind that everyone (NIOSH, DOL, SC&A, the complete Board with

the exception of new members), had been given a 400+ page Workbook

about GSI, including the two Betatrons and their respective Buildings (maps,

photos, history etc.). This was done some time ago in an effort to avoid errors and

omissions. (More workbooks can be provided if requested.)

The Basis and outline for the GSI \Vorkhook, was the very extensive

CATI interview that was conducted, checked, double checked, revised etc. by a very

professional, competent, individual interviewer named Heather. That information

\vas meant to give a lot oc our then-kno\vn details to everyone very early"in this

process. (Sept. 7,2005, IS pages incl. cover) \Ve heard two versions of\vhat then

happens to our CA TI:

1. It \vill be passed along and shared \vlth everyone involved \vith GSI.

2. It ,viii go into the claimant's file.

It aepears to us that it went into the claimant's file.

All of the inCormation in the" \vorkbook ,vas discussed and covered in

detail at the NIOSH sponsored GSI Outreach Meeting, along with personal"

testimony Crom workers. SINE\V provided NIOSH with professional, certified

transcripts, and video, so the record would be accurate. This GSI Appendix

Document Owner, and nvo otber NIOSH employees attended the meeting. Where is

the resultant inCormation in the Appendix?

The facts actually get \vorse. Tbe "Old" Betatron that Is mentioned In this

Appendix \vas 24 MeV in po\ver and not 25 MeV, according to the GSI Betatron

operators \vho are assisting us. We feel that "someone" kne\v about the second,

"Ne\v" Betatron, the one 25 MeV In power, or why was there a reference to 25 MeV

at all? Perhaps it was simply overlooked. This must be corrected.

Why must the New Betatron be included? One of the most important and crucial

missing facts is that this second, Ne\v Betatron and it's Building were directly

connected to the most worker-populated areas that included all of the other

connected buildings. A visit to the site, confirmed that there were no thick 10 ft.

\valls or shielding in this area, connecting to Building #10. 'Vbat \vent into #10

Building from the Ne\v Betatron area, went into Buildings 9, 8, etc. and the Main

Foundry. Tbere \vere no \valls behveen these buildings, which means there was

maximum exposure for all \vorkers. Tbere \vas a simple ribbon door, not hea\ily

shielded, from the Ne\v Betatron building into #10 Building. X-rayed castings were

rushed into this #10 building right after NDT. That was the primary reason for the

close proximity of the Ne\v Betatron building to the main "finishing" \vork area,

\vitbout regard to the safety of many workers. (Distance is a factor that is always

mentioned in radiation safety material.) Again, these facts ""ere provided to NIOSH

in many forms at various times.

-

This "open" buildings arrangement saved valuable GSI internal R.R. track

movementime and alsp got the castings Into the New"Betatron very quickly. (The

4
# C_2010225EN.01000301.xml

| 20.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 August 2010

2010/C 225/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2836 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4506 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82055 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4389 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3331 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8945 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,793 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 276,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7083 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9283 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2260 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9275 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4258 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3180 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9748 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8047 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7343 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 505,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3239 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7159 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2908 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 511,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0107 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,676 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,0908 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,504 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2519 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1753 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,5200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2836

JPY

Japanese yen

109,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4506

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82055

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4389

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3331

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8945

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,793

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

276,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7083

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9283

RON

Romanian leu

4,2260

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9275

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4258

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3180

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9748

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8047

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7343

KRW

South Korean won

1 505,11

ZAR

South African rand

9,3239

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7159

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2908

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 511,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0107

PHP

Philippine peso

57,676

RUB

Russian rouble

39,0908

THB

Thai baht

40,504

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2519

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1753

INR

Indian rupee

59,5200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6084 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6084

 To amend title VII of the Social Security Act to provide for a single 
point of contact at the Social Security Administration for individuals 
                   who are victims of identity theft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2018

Mr. Bishop of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, and Mr. 
Sam Johnson of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title VII of the Social Security Act to provide for a single 
point of contact at the Social Security Administration for individuals 
                   who are victims of identity theft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Social Security's Service 
to Victims of Identity Theft Act''.

SEC. 2. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR IDENTITY THEFT VICTIMS.

    Title VII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 901 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SECTION 714. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR IDENTITY THEFT VICTIMS.

    ``(a) In General.--The Commissioner of Social Security shall 
establish and implement procedures to ensure that any individual who 
requests a new social security account number due to theft or breach or 
whose social security account number is used to fraudulently obtain 
benefits under title II, VIII, or XVI of this Act has a single point of 
contact at the Social Security Administration throughout the processing 
of the individual's case. The single point of contact shall track the 
individual's case to completion and coordinate with other units to 
resolve issues as quickly as possible.
    ``(b) Single Point of Contact.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of subsection (a), the 
        single point of contact shall consist of a team or subset of 
        specially trained employees who--
                    ``(A) have the ability to coordinate with other 
                units to resolve the issues involved in the 
                individual's case, and
                    ``(B) shall be accountable for the case until its 
                resolution.
            ``(2) Team or subset.--The employees included within the 
        team or subset described in paragraph (1) may change as 
        required to meet the needs of the Social Security 
        Administration, provided that procedures have been established 
        to--
                    ``(A) ensure continuity of records and case 
                history, and
                    ``(B) notify the individual when appropriate.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1255

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Todd Roger Farver

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

 ____________

 Submitted: September 6, 2019

Filed: September 13, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Todd Farver appeals the sentence the district court1imposed after he pleaded

guilty to a child pornography offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has

1The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.
filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an

unreasonable sentence. The court properly considered the factors set forth in 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a), and there is no indication that the court considered an improper or

irrelevant factor or committed a clear error in weighing relevant factors. See United

States v. Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (discussing appellate

review of sentencing decisions). Further, the court imposed a sentence within the

calculated guidelines imprisonment range. See United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d

754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (stating that a within-guidelines-range sentence is presumed

reasonable).

Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion and affirm.

______________________________

-2-