alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                      ROSE HILLS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    (millions of dollars except for ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Predecessor         Predecessor         Predecessor        Predecessor       Predecessor

                                          Year ended          Year ended          Year ended         Year ended        Year ended
                                         December 31,        December 31,        December 31,       December 31,      December 31,
                                             2001                2000                1999               1998              1997
                                        -------------        ------------        ------------       ------------      ------------
<S>                                     <C>                 <C>                  <C>                <C>               <C>
Net (loss) income before income taxes    $  (12.3)           $   (3.3)(1)         $      7.3         $      3.0        $     (1.7)
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense  .................       14.7                 16.1                  15.9               16.8              16.5
                                         --------            ---------            ----------         ----------        ----------
Total Fixed Charges  .................       14.7                 16.1                  15.9               16.8              16.5
   Net (loss) income before income
     taxes and fixed charges  ........   $    2.4            $    12.8 (1)        $     23.2          $    19.8         $    14.8
                                         ========            =========            ==========          =========         =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...        .16                 0.80 (1)              1.46               1.20              0.90
                                         ========            =========            ==========          =========         =========
Coverage deficiency  .................   $   12.3            $     3.3            $       -           $      -          $     1.7
                                         ========            =========            ==========          =========         =========
</TABLE>
-----------------------
(1)  Excludes cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $7.5
     million (net of a $4.9 million income tax benefit).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM METRIKA
SYSTEMS CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                 15,093
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          27,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                            2,286
<INVENTORY>                                            12,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       64,885
<PP&E>                                                 17,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        105,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  29,067
<BONDS>                                                 3,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   83
<OTHER-SE>                                             66,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          105,444
<SALES>                                                70,029
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       70,029
<CGS>                                                  40,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          40,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        4,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          470
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        10,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                            3,950
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     6,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            6,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.77
        

</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0630

_____________________________

OSCAR J. AMADOR,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

December 19, 2023

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

M.K. THOMAS, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Oscar J. Amador, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00287

- CV

GEICO Advantage Insurance Company , Appellant

v.

Patricia Mihal , Appellee

FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 20

- 001403 , THE HONORABLE CATHERINE MAUZY , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed an agree d motion to dismiss the appeal stating that they

have settled the underlying dispute and asking that we issue the ma ndate earl y. See Tex. R. App.

P. 18.1(c) (allowing ma nd ate to issue early “ if the parties so agree ” ) . We grant the motion and

d ismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

Dismissed

Filed: Septe mber 3, 2021
Presidential Documents

7459 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 26 

Thursday, February 7, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of February 6, 2008 

Continuation of the National Emergency Relating to Cuba 

and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the Regulation 

of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels 

On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared 

to address the disturbance or threatened disturbance of international relations 

caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government 

of two unarmed U.S.-registered civilian aircraft in international airspace 

north of Cuba. In July 1996 and on subsequent occasions, the Cuban government stated its intent to forcefully defend its sovereignty against any U.S.- 

registered vessels or aircraft that might enter Cuban territorial waters or 

airspace while involved in a flotilla or peaceful protest. Since these events, 

the Cuban government has not demonstrated that it will refrain from the 

future use of reckless and excessive force against U.S. vessels or aircraft 

that may engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest north of Cuba. 

On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the scope of the national 

emergency was expanded in order to deny monetary and material support 

to the repressive Cuban government, which had taken a series of steps 

to destabilize relations with the United States, including threatening to 

abrogate the Migration Accords with the United States and to close the 

United States Interests Section. Further, Cuba’s most senior officials repeatedly asserted that the United States intended to invade Cuba, despite explicit 

denials from the U.S. Secretaries of State and Defense that such action 

is planned. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National 

Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency 

with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation 

of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867 

as amended and expanded by Proclamation 7757. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2
7460 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

February 6, 2008. [FR Doc. 08–595 

Filed 2–6–08; 11:19 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
SCWC
- 16

- 0000890 and SCWC

- 17

- 0000216
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________ PRUDENTIAL LOCATIONS, LLC, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellant,

vs. LORNA GAGNON and PRESTIGE REALTY GROUP LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioners/Defendants/Cross

- Claim Defendants

- Appellees, and RE/MAX LLC and LORRAINE CLAWSON, Respondents/Defendants/Cross

- Claimants/ Third

- Party Plaintiffs

- Appellees, and KEVIN TENGAN, Respondent/Third

- Party Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________________________________________________ CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 16

- 0000890 & CAAP

- 17

- 0000216; CIV. NO. 13

- 1

- 2328) CONCURRENCE IN PART TO ORDER S GRANTING MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE OPINION OF THE COURT (By : Recktenwald, C.J. , with whom Nakayama, J. , joins )
I concur in the Majority’s order s grant ing Respondent / Plaintiff

- Appellant Prudential Locations, LLC N/K/A Locations Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000890 31-MAR-2022 02:57 PM Dkt. 94 ORDC2 LLC’s (Locations) motion for clarification filed on February 28, 2022, and Petitioners/Defendants

- Appellees Lorna Gagnon and Prestige Realty Group Limited Liability Company’s motion for clarification filed on February 28, 2022, in order to amend language in the majority opinion filed on February 1 7, 2022, relating to the non

- solicitation agreement and Sherrie Au , and
to attorneys’ fees and costs . However , f or reasons set forth in my concurrence and dissent filed on February 1 7, 2022, I conclude that Locations’ breach of contract claims against Gagnon based on the non

compete clause may be enforceable. For that reason, I would grant Respondent / Plaintiff

- Appellant Prudential Locations, LLC N/K/A Locations LLC’s motion for clarification and vacate the circuit court’s grant of summa ry judgment to Gagnon with respect to the non

- compete clause . DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, March 3 1 , 2022. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Exhibit 10.21


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


to the


PRUDENTIAL SAVINGS BANK


SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1
(the “Amendment”) to the Severance Agreement between Prudential Savings Bank, a Pennsylvania-chartered, stock-form
savings bank (the “Bank”), and Jeffrey T. Hanuscin (the “Executive”) dated May 6, 2015 (the “Agreement”),
is hereby effective as of November 13, 2015.


 


WHEREAS, the Executive
is presently employed as the Vice President and Controller of the Bank;


 


WHEREAS, effective
May 6, 2015, the Executive and the Bank entered into the Agreement which provided for, among other things, severance benefits under
certain circumstances as set forth in the Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the Bank
wishes to clarify certain provisions of the Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the Bank
and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to reflect the mutually agreed upon revision to the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive
is willing to serve the Bank on the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements herein contained, the Bank and the Executive do hereby agree to amend the
Agreement as follows:


 


1. Section 1(b) of the Agreement be
and hereby is rescinded and deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:


 


  1(b)Base
Salary. “Base Salary” shall mean the amount per calendar year that the Bank pays Executive for
his services, which amount may be adjusted from time to      time as determined by the Board of Directors,
  subject to the provisions hereof.


 


2. All other sections and provisions
in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and are incorporated by reference into this Amendment.


 


[signature page follows]




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	ATTEST:	PRUDENTIAL SAVINGS BANK
		 
	 	 
	By: /s/ Regina Wilson	 	By: /s/ Joseph R. Corrato	 
	Name:Regina Wilson	Joseph R. Corrato
	Title: Corporate Secretary	President/Chief
Executive Officer
	 	 
	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Jeffrey T. Hanuscin	 
	 	Jeffrey T. Hanuscin
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 83 (Friday, April 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 22804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10134]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 27, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Independent Bank Group, Inc., McKinney, Texas; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Town Center Bank, Coppell, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 27, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-10134 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Order entered February 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00745-CR

MIGUEL ANGEL CASTELLANOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-82163-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 13, 2020 third motion for extension of time to 

file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before March 4, 

2020. If appellant fails to file his brief by that date, we will abate the appeal for a hearing without 

further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3).

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
Special Exposure Cohort Petition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

under the e,..rgy Employees Qocupational Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

IU,..ss Canpensation Act 0 1-22-a 7 A 11 : 47 A I~ National Institute for OCQ,Ipational Safety and Health

~B Number: 0920-0639 Expires: 05/3112007 Spe~ial Exoosure Cohort Petition~nn A Pape1 of ~

." . " . '

Ys,~:ot,t.hI~!rifJn-~nd d~$..cIO8Ur'8;of':Sp.cia..:,~ecuri~, ~~mber~r8 voJunt;a!'Yo :Faiju~ to,u,ace thi~:fo~ or ~i~clo~,

,;:~i, !\~~b;~r: wUJcnot:~ult in the denlal~f ~l1y nght, 'benefit, or pnv.lLege to'W~c:h y~u may be entit1,~

Instructions on Completing this Form:

You should use this petition form only if NIOSH has reported to you in writing that it cannot complete the

dose reconstruction needed for your cancer claim.

I All other petitioners should use Petition Form B to submit a petition to NIOSH

For Further Information: If you have questions about these instructions, please call the following NIOSH

to - ree phone number and request to speak to someone In the ce of Compensation na ys an

Support about an SEC petition: 1-800-3564674.

NJOSH Tracking Number (indicated on aU NIOSH correspondence): IA.1

'A.2

A3

Print and sign your name below to indicate that you are petitioning for HHS to consider adding a class i

of employees to the Special Exposure Cohort that would Include the employee indicated by the

tracking number or name under entry 1 above.

Print vnllr n_,"o hAl ,. ~in" ., ~ --- -' .

nl~l~ . MrOaJe Initiar Last Nime r-irst Name MiddleTlnltial Last Name

Once NIOSH receives this form. the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will consider adding a

class of employees to the Special Exposure Cohort. Your contact at NIOSH will be available to inform you of

the progress of your petition.

Send this tom! to: SEC Petition

Office of Compensation Analysis and Support

NIOSH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-C-47

CinciMati, OH 45226

Name or Social Security Number of First Petitioner:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SUSAN KRANKOWSKI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 653 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free Income Fund,Inc.

1)The disclosure on residual interestbonds has been revised to reflect disclosure for residual interestsecurities.

Residual Interest Securities These area type of potentially high-risk derivative. The income stream provided by anunderlying tax-exempt bond is divided to create two securities, one short termand one long term. The interest rate on the short-term component is resetthrough periodic remarketing or another rate-setting process, typically everyseven days. After income is paid on the short-term securities at current rates,the residual income goes to the long-term securities. Therefore, risingshort-term interest rates result in lower income for the longer-term portion,and vice versa. The longer-term securities can be very volatile and may be lessliquid than other municipals of comparable maturity. The IRS has not issued adefinitive ruling on the tax-exempt nature of these securities. However, thefund will only invest in securities with a structure that nationally recognizedbond counsel has concluded allows for the pass through of tax-exempt interest toinvestors. 

2)Disclosure on ParticipationInterests has been removed from the prospectuses and replaced with thefollowing.

Floating Rate      Certificates
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 21.1.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

WHOLLY-OWNED

927563 Ontario Inc.
927564 Ontario Inc.
Med-Emerg Inc.
Med Plus Health Centres Ltd.
Med-Emerg Urgent Care Centres Inc.
Med-Emerg Family Health Centres Inc.
Med-Emerg Elmvale Clinic Inc.
YFMC Heathcare Inc.
1185943 Ontario Inc.
YFMC Healthcare (Alberta) Inc.
1024528 Ontario Ltd.
1180668 Ontario Inc.
1292363 Ontario Corp.
HealthyConnect.com, Inc.

75%-OWNED

Doctors on Call Ltd.

51%-OWNED

York Lanes Health Centre Inc.
Caremedics (Elmvale) Inc.

45%-OWNED

Medical Urgent Care Inc.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00200

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director

Division of Energy Employees Occupational

 Illness Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321

Washington, District of Columbia 20210

Dear Ms. Leiton:

National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

4676 Columbia Parkway

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998

Phone: 513-533-6825

Fax: 513-533-6826

April 28, 2014

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Company in Fort Wayne, Indiana, as 

an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000. On March 27, 2014, as provided for under 42 U.S.C.

§7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the 

SEC:

All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked for Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co. 

at the covered facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana, from March 1, 1943, through July 31, 1948, 

for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely 

under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established 

for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on April 26, 2014, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §7384l(14)(C). 

Hence, beginning on April 26, 2014, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this 

notice, became members of the SEC.

Sincerely,

[Signature on File]

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUAN ABEL SANTIAGO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 322 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**Consent of Independent RegisteredChartered Accountants**

 

We consent to the use of our reports dated February 17,2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of ARC Energy Trust(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a separate reporttitled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants onCanada-United States of America Reporting Difference relating to changes inaccounting principles) and the effectiveness of ARC Energy Trust’s internalcontrol over financial reporting incorporated by reference in the Annual Reporton Form 40-F of ARC Energy Trust for the year ended December 31,2009.

 

 

(signed) “Deloitte & Touche LLP”Independent Registered Chartered AccountantsCalgary, Canada

 

March 26, 2010

 

----