Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Notices 24741 

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 

Hazard Mitigation Grant. 

W. Craig Fugate, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10544 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–23–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–1906– 

DR; Docket ID FEMA–2010–0002] 

Mississippi; Amendment No. 1 to 

Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice 

of a major disaster declaration for the 

State of Mississippi (FEMA–1906–DR), 

dated April 29, 2010, and related 

determinations. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 29, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, 

DC 20472, (202) 646–3886. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice 

of a major disaster declaration for the 

State of Mississippi is hereby amended 

to include the following areas among 

those areas determined to have been 

adversely affected by the event declared 

a major disaster by the President in his 

declaration of April 29, 2010. 

Attala, Holmes, and Warren Counties for 

Individual Assistance. 

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic 

Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used 

for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 

Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora 

Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 

97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, 

Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 

97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 

97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to 

Individuals and Households In Presidentially 

Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 

Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— 

Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals 

and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 

Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals 

and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, 

Disaster Grants—Public Assistance 

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 

Hazard Mitigation Grant. 

W. Craig Fugate, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10547 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–23–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R2–ES–2010–N062; 20124–11130000– 

C2] 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Mexican Wolf (Canis lupus 

baileyi) Conservation Assessment 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability: 

Conservation assessment. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 

availability of the Mexican Wolf 

Conservation Assessment (assessment). 

The assessment provides scientific 

information relevant to the conservation 

of the Mexican wolf (Canis lupus 

baileyi) in Arizona and New Mexico as 

a component of the Service’s gray wolf 

(Canis lupus) recovery efforts. Not 

required by the Endangered Species Act 

(Act), the assessment is a nonregulatory 

document that does not require action 

by any party. 

ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the 

assessment is on our Web site at http: 

//www.fws.gov/southwest/es/Library/. 

You may also obtain a paper copy by 

contacting Maggie Dwire, by U.S. mail 

at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, New 

Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, 

2105 Osuna NE, Albuquerque, NM 

87113; by telephone at 505–761–4783; 

by facsimile at 505–346–2542; or by email at Maggie_Dwire@fws.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maggie Dwire (see ADDRESSES). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Listed Entity 

The Mexican wolf was listed as an 

endangered subspecies of gray wolf in 

1976 (41 FR 17736, April 28, 1976). In 

1978, the Service listed the gray wolf 

species in North America south of 

Canada as endangered, except in 

Minnesota where it was listed as 

threatened (43 FR 9607, March 9, 1978). 

The 1978 rangewide listing of the gray 

wolf species subsumed the subspecies 

listing; however, we stated in the 

preamble to the rule that the Service 

would continue to recognize the 

Mexican wolf as a valid biological 

subspecies for purposes of research and 

conservation (43 FR 9607). After the 

1978 listing of the gray wolf in the U.S. 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the 

50 CFR 17.11(h) List of Endangered and 

Threatened Wildlife did not explicitly 

refer to an entity called the ‘‘Mexican 

wolf.’’ Due to the Mexican wolf’s 

previous listed status as a subspecies, 

we have continued to refer to the gray 

wolf in the southwestern United States 

as the ‘‘Mexican wolf.’’ Today, the gray 

wolf has been delisted in Idaho and 

Montana and portions of Oregon, 

Washington, and Utah (74 FR 15123, 

April 2, 2009). It is listed as threatened 

in Minnesota and remains endangered 

throughout the remaining coterminous 

United States and Mexico, except where 

designated as nonessential experimental 

populations (63 FR 1752, January 12, 

1998, and 74 FR 15123). 

Background 

The conservation and recovery of 

species are primary goals of the 

Service’s endangered species program. 

The Mexican wolf historically inhabited 

the southwestern United States and 

portions of Mexico until it was virtually 

eliminated in the wild by private and 

governmental predator eradication 

efforts in the late 1800s and early to 

mid-1900s. Conservation and recovery 

efforts to ensure the survival of the 

Mexican wolf were initially guided by 

the 1982 Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan 

(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1982) 

(recovery plan), which recommended 

the establishment of a captive breeding 

program and the reintroduction of 

Mexican wolves to the wild. Both of 

these recommendations have been 

implemented. Today an international 

captive breeding program houses more 

than 300 wolves, and a wild population 

of approximately 42 wolves (as of the 

official 2009 end-of-year count) inhabits 

Arizona and New Mexico. 

Although the 1982 recovery plan was 

instrumental in guiding the inception of 

the Mexican wolf program in the 

southwest, the plan requires updating to 

provide current guidance for the 

reintroduction and recovery effort. We 

have initiated revisions to the 1982 

recovery plan, but have been unable to 

finalize a revision due to various 

constraints. We are working to resolve 

these constraints to reinitiate a full 

revision of the recovery plan, and are 

undertaking this conservation 

assessment as an interim step. 

This assessment provides the type of 

information typically contained in a 

recovery plan, including the listing 

history of the Mexican wolf and gray 

wolf, current species’ biology and 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
24742 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Notices 

ecology, an assessment of current 

threats to the Mexican wolf in the wild, 

and an overview and assessment of 

current conservation and recovery 

efforts. However, the assessment is not 

intended to serve as a revised recovery 

plan for the Mexican wolf. The 

assessment does not contain recovery 

criteria, site-specific management 

actions, or time and cost estimates, the 

three statutorily required elements of a 

recovery plan (16 U.S.C. 1533(f)(1)(B)), 

nor does it contain recommendations for 

the future of our Mexican wolf program 

in the southwest. Social and economic 

aspects of wolf conservation are not 

addressed in the document. It is a 

nonregulatory document intended 

solely as a compilation of current 

scientific information relevant to 

Mexican wolf conservation that may be 

used by any interested party. We intend 

to use the document as one of many 

information sources guiding our 

continuing conservation and recovery 

efforts in the southwest. 

We made the draft conservation 

assessment available for public review 

and comment for 60 days (74 FR 913, 

January 9, 2009). We also conducted a 

peer review of the assessment during 

this time. After consideration of public 

and peer review comments, we made 

revisions to the assessment and provide 

the final document to the public with 

this notice. 

Authority: The authority for this action is 

the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

Dated: March 16, 2010. 

Benjamin N. Tuggle, 

Regional Director, Region 2. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10470 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–716] 

In the Matter of Certain Large Scale 

Integrated Circuit Semiconductor 

Chips and Products Containing Same; 

Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

April 1, 2010, under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Panasonic 

Corporation, Ltd. of Japan. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 based upon the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain large scale 

integrated circuit semiconductor chips 

and products containing same by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,933,364 and 6,834,336. 

The complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and cease and desist 

orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2746. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

April 28, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain large scale 

integrated circuit semiconductor chips 

or products containing the same that 

infringe one or more of claims 1 and 

4–6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,933,364 and 

claims 18–21, 24–27, and 30–32 of U.S. 

Patent 6,834,336, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Panasonic 

Corporation, Ltd., 1006 Kadoma, 

Kadoma City, Osaka 571–8501, Japan. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 6501 

William Cannon Drive West, 

Austin, Texas 78735. 

Freescale Semiconductor Japan Ltd., 

ARCO Tower 15F, 1–8–1, ShimoMeguro, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153– 

0064, Japan. 

Freescale Semiconductor, Xiqing 

Integrated Semiconductor, 

Manufacturing Site, No. 15 Xinghua 

Road, Xiqing Economic 

Development Area, Tianjin, China 

300381. 

Freescale Semiconductor, Innovation 

Center, Zhangjiang Building 20F 

Unit A, No. 560 Songtao Road, 

Pudong New District, Shanghai 

210203, China. 

Freescale Semiconductor Malaysia Sdn. 

Bhd., NO. 2 Jalan SS 8/2, Free 

Industrial Zone, Sungai Way, 47300 

Petaling Jaya, Selengor, Malaysia. 

Freescale Semiconductor Pte. Ltd., 7 

Changi South Street 2, #03–00, 

Singapore 486415. 

Freescale Semiconductor Taiwan Ltd., 

6F, Unit 6, 66, San-Chong Road, 

Taipei City 11560, Taiwan. 

Mouser Electronics, Inc., 1000 North 

Main Street, Mansfield, Texas 

76063. 

Premier Farnell Corporation d/b/a 

Newark, 7061 East Pleasant Valley, 

Independence, Ohio 44131. 

Motorola Inc., 1303 East Algonquin 

Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES