alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aurios Inc. for the quarter ended June      30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Aurios    Inc. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    |  /s/ Paul      Attaway                                            |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| Name:  | Paul      Attaway                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and  Director                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| Date:  | August      16,2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1506 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1506

   To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclic olefin copolymer resin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 1999

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclic olefin copolymer resin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLIC OLEFIN COPOLYMER RESIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.39.00    Cyclic olefin     Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     copolymer resin                                                         31/2002          ''
                     (CAS No. 26007-                                                                           .
                     43-2) (provided
                     for in heading
                     3902.90.00)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Auto Data Network, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended February 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher R. Glover, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





                        /s/ Christopher R. Glover
                        ------------------------------------
                        Christopher R. Glover
                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                        June 17, 2003
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 

 National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

 Phone: 513-533-6825 

 Fax: 513-533-6826 

 

 July 30, 2007 

SEC Tracking number: SEC00082 

Peter M. Turcic, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Room C-4511 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Mr. Turcic: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as 

required by 42 C.F.R. pt. 83.17(c), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to 

designate a class of employees at W.R. Grace, Erwin, Tennessee, as an addition to the Special 

Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000. On June 22, 2007, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS 

designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who were monitored or should have been 

monitored for potential exposure to thorium while working in any of the 100 series buildings 

or Buildings 220, 230, 233, 234, 301, or 310 at the W. R. Grace site at Erwin, Tennessee for 

a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days from January 1, 1958, through 

December 31, 1970, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for 

one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on July 22, 2007, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). 

Hence, beginning on July 22, 2007, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this 

notice, became members of the SEC. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Larry J. Elliott 

 Director 

 Office of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AUSTIN SCOTT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 466 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
November 6, 1961 

Honorable Jack Hardee 

District Attorney 

3rd Judicial District 

Athens, Texas 

Opinion'No. WW-1186 

Re: Whether Article 1334 of 

the Penal Code applies 

to third party,wire 

tapping on telephone 

lines where a third 

party taps a telephone 

and intercepts a conversation between two other 

parties and related 

Dear Mr. Hardee: questions. 

You have requested an opinion as follows: 

"Please give me an opinion as to whether or 

not wire tapping, that is where a third;party 

taps a telephone line and intercepts and records a conversation between two other parties, 

comes under the above article." 

Article 1334 o.f Vernon's Penal Code is as follows: 

"If any person shall intentionally break, cut, 

pull or tear down, misplace or in any other 

manner injure any telegraph or telephone wire, 

post, machinery, or other necessary appurtenances to any such line, or in any way wilfully obstruct or interfere with the transmission of messages along such telegraph or 

telephone line, he shall be confined in the 

penitentiary not less than two nor more than 

five years or be fined not less than one 

hundred nor more than two thousand dollars." 

The court in Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. 

v. Priest, 72 S.W. 241 (Civ. App. 1903), held: 

"To constitute an offense under this article 

P 

334 V.P.CJ, there must have been a breakng, cutting, etc., of some wire, post, 

machinery, or other necessary appurtenance, 
Honorable Jack Hardee Page 2 Opinion No. W-1186 

in such manner as to interfere with the 

transmission of messages along the line." 

It is the opinion of this office that "wire tapping." 

as you defined it will not constitute a violation of the 

above Article of the Penal Code in the absence of a willful 

obst?uztion or interference with the transmission of messages 

alor.:: such telephone lines. The interception and the recording of a conversation between two other parties would not of 

itself be an obstruction or interference with that conversation. 

SUMMARY 

The "tappinzand recording of a telephone 

conversation does not constitute a willful 

obstruction or interference with the 

transmission of messages as to violate 

Article 1334 of Vernon's Penal Code. 

Yours very truly, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney General of Texas 

4 AdA 

BY n 

J. T. Walker 

Assistant Attorney General 

JTW:sh 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

::. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Joseph Trimble 

Elmer McVey 

Riley Fletcher 

RRVIEWED FOR THE ATTOPNEY GENERAL 

5y : Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 287 -CV

J. D. G ulle y, App e lla nt

v. P hili p Su eoka, Appellee

FR OM T HE C OU N T Y C OU R T A T L A W N O. 3 OF BE L L C OU N T Y NO. 51,7 69 , HO NORAB LE GERALD M. BRO WN , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N
This is an appe al from the c ounty court at law’s judg ment decla ringthat the bre achof-c ontrac t claim broug ht by J .D. Gulley

was ba rre d by res judicata. However, be cause it is clear from the r ecor d that Gulley ’s suit originated in small c laims c ourt, we have no jurisdiction to hear Gulley ’s appe al and must there fore dismiss for w an t of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 28.053(d) ( West 2004); Tex . R. App. P. 60.2(a).
DI SCU SSIO N Gulley repr esents in his appellate brief that his ini tial suit was hear d in justi ce c ourt and appe aled to the c ount y court at law. Howe ver, the cler k’s re cord e stablishes that Gulley ’s orig inal petition was filed, and judgment was e ntere d, in Small C laims Court of Precinct 1, Be ll Count y , Texas, which had jurisdicti o n o v er t he suit. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 28.003 (West Supp. 2007). The judgment i s captioned “ I N THE SMAL LCL AI MS COURT” and bea rs the2

seal of the small claims court, see id. § 2 8. 00 6 ( Wes t 20 04 ), and Gu lle y ’s pe tit ion

su bs tan tiall y complies with the form for actions in small claims court. Id. § 28.012. Un de r t he g ov e rnme nt c od e , a

dis satis fi e d p art

y may a pp e a l th e jud g me nt o f t

he sma ll claims court to the c ounty court or c ounty

court at law, id. § 28.052(a) (West Supp. 2007), but the judgme nt on appea l is “final.” Id. § 28.053(d) ( West 2004). The Texas Sup re m e Court has interpre ted this provision to m ean that the j udg ment of a county court or county court at law is “final
an d n ot a pp e ala ble .” Sultan v. Mathew , 1 78 S.W. 3d 74 7, 75 1 ( Te x. 20 05 ) ( e mph a sis a dd e d) . T hu s, “under section 28.053(d) of the Texas G overnme nt Code , the courts of appea ls lack jurisdiction over
case s orig inally

filed in the small claims court.” Id. at 75 2; se eals o Li ste r v . W

alte rs , No. 06-07-00137- CV, 2008 Tex. App. L EXI S 1351, at *4-5 (Te x . App.—Texarkana Fe b. 22, 2008, no pet . h
. ) (holding that cour t lacked jur isdiction to consider appe al, noting that although se vera l do c ume nts in r e c or d w e re c a pti on e d “In J us tic e Court ” and se ve ra l c onta ine d s e a l of jus tic e c ourt , plaintiff’s petition was c aptioned “I n Small C l ai ms Court” and petition complied with form for actions in small claims court).

Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________ Diane H enson, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Puryear and He nson Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: May

9, 2008
1j - ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 23-0232 

IN RE THE PETITION OF MATTHEW S. 

CRANSTON FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF 

THE STATE OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Matthew S. Cranston has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of 

Montana pursuant to Rule III of the Rules for Admission, upon examination. The Bar 

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that 

Cranston passed the July 2023 Bar Examination and that the Commission on Character and 

Fitness has certified that Cranston has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission. 

Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Matthew S. Cranston may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this l 0day of October, 2023. 

FILED 

OCT 1 0 2023 

BOWerl Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

Stata of Ts/lantana 

sZe ) ?

Chief Justice 

10/10/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0232
J

e94 J4 1 1*.•ft 

Justices 

2
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


I, Robert Smyjunas, Chief Executive Officer and of VanHolt
Group, Ltd. (formerly Spinnet Acquisition Corporation), certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the attached report on Form 10-Q.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
     untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
     fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this report, fairly present
     in all material respects the financial condition, results of
     operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
     the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
     controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules)
     for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
     those entities, particularly during the period in which this
     report is being prepared;

b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting to
     provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
     financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
     for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
     accounting principles;

c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report my
     conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
     controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
     by this report based on such evaluations; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred
     during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
     registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
     likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
     registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
     board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
     and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
     weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal controls.

      Date: November 13, 2009                /s/ Robert Smyjunas
                                          President and Director
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 25 , 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00058

- CR

David Alexander ZUNIGA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4390B

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and the appeal is ABATED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for

appointment of new counsel to represent appellant on ap peal.

The trial court clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order

appointing new appellate counsel within thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on July 25, 2018.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of July, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
WILLIE RAYMOND PETTY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1502

Opinion filed July 8, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Willie Raymond Petty, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The “Petition for All Writs” is treated by the court as a petition for writ of 

mandamus, and is denied. See Pettway v. State, 776 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 2000).

BENTON, CLARK, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 

 National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

 Phone: 513-533-6825 

 Fax: 513-533-6826 

 

 July 2, 2008 

SEC Tracking number: SEC00108 

Peter M. Turcic, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Room C-4511 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Mr. Turcic: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as 

required by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to 

designate a class of employees at the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) 

facility, Parks Township, Pennsylvania, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under 

the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On May 30, 

2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following 

class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who worked at the Nuclear 

Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) facility in Parks Township, 

Pennsylvania, from June 1, 1960, through December 31, 1980, for a number of work 

days aggregating at least 250 work days occurring either solely under this 

employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for 

one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on June 29, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on June 29, 2008, members of this class of employees, defined as 

reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Larry J. Elliott 

 Director 

 Office of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed September 29, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00090-CV

CHELSEA L. DAVIS, Appellant

V.

HARLAN R. CROW, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC13-14479

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Lewis

Opinion by Justice Francis

Appellant’s brief in this case was due August 1, 2014. When appellant failed to file her 

brief, we notified her, by postcard dated August 4, 2014, that the time had expired and directed 

her to file her brief along with an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned that the 

failure to file her brief and extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without 

further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of her brief or this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3 (b), (c).

140090F.P05

/Molly Francis/

MOLLY FRANCIS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CHELSEA L. DAVIS, Appellant

No. 05-14-00090-CV V.

HARLAN R. CROW, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC13-14479.

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, 

Justices Myers and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee HARLAN R. CROW recover his costs of this appeal, if 

any, from appellant CHELSEA L. DAVIS.

Judgment entered this 29th day of September, 2014.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHERMAN LEE BRYANT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3533 and 4D16-3579

[March 15, 2018]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Okeechobee County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

472015CF000610A and 472015CF000049A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen R. Geesey, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and KUNTZ, J.J., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.