alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
462 A.2d 250

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Samuel Eugene MAXFIELD, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted March 22, 1983.

Filed June 24, 1983.

*391Robert Bruce Evanick, Public Defender, York, for appellant.

Floyd Paul Jones, Assistant District Attorney, York, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, President Judge, and CIRILLO, and HOFFMAN, JJ.

CERCONE, President Judge:

This is a direct appeal from judgment of sentence entered after the lower court denied appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment on a robbery conviction.1 The lower court concludes in its opinion pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925, that it erred in denying appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment as to his robbery conviction. That is, the lower court re-examined the evidence as presented at trial and concluded that it did not support a finding that appellant knew that his co-defendant took a rape victim’s wallet, of which rape appellant was found guilty, nor that appellant acted as an accomplice with his co-defendant in securing the wallet.2 However, because the case was no longer within the lower court’s jurisdiction, it having been appealed to our Court, the lower court had no authority to rectify the error made.

Inasmuch as the lower court admits the error of its decision, we shall remand the matter to the lower court to *392reconsider its denial of appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment based upon its Rule 1925 opinion.

Judgment of sentence vacated and case remanded to the lower court.3

1

. Appellant was also convicted of rape in connection with the same criminal episode, but has preserved no issues as to that conviction.

2

. Although appellant’s argument is framed in terms of court error in refusing to grant his demurrer which was lost as an appealable issue when appellant elected to present his case, it is considered as court error in refusing to grant appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment. *Commonwealth v. Ilgenfritz,*466 Pa. 345, 353 A.2d 387 (1976).

3

. Our decision renders appellant’s second contention moot. Thus, we will not discuss it.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 23

- 00210

- CR
IN RE Miguel Angel COLORADO NEVAREZ Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Delivered and Filed: May 31, 2023
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED AS MOOT On March 6, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion
to stay the underlying proceeding pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted in part on March 8, 2023. Relator’s mandamus petition argu es the trial court failed to rule on his application for writ of habeas corpus and his motion to waive. Relator’s motion seeks to waive his required in

- person attendance at a March 9, 2023 pretrial hearing. After relator filed this original proceeding, th e trial court denied relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus. When the trial court ruled on his application for writ of habeas corpus, relator received the relief he sought through his mandamus petition, rendering his petition moot.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11354CR , styled State of Texas v. Miguel Angel Colorado Nevarez , pending in the County Court , Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth and the Honorable Susan D. Reed presiding.04

- 23

- 00210

- CR

- 2

- See In re Bonil la , 424 S.W.3d 528, 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (orig. proceeding) (holding mandamus petition was moot where relator received relief sought). Additionally, because of the stay granted by this court, relator’s complaint about his required in

- person attendanc e at the March 9, 2023 pretrial hearing is also moot. See id. We, therefore, dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and lift the stay we imposed on March 8, 2023

. PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of WorldGate Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Calarco, as Principal Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 5, 2011

/s/ Joseph CalarcoJoseph Calarco

Controller and Vice President, Finance(Principal Financial Officer)
**CERTIFICATION      OF **
**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year                ending December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of                section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and                                                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB                for                the period ending December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Univec, Inc. |

| Dated:                January 3, 2007 |
|---------------------------------------|

**UNIVEC,      INC.**

| By: | */s/                Michael A. Lesisko*Chief Financial                Officer |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN



### Roa. 0. CT.

Wild. ooullt~ Au~itw Oorpu8 UhrUti, hum Iboar 8lrr


### Your latter ai
II the appointaeat **t b902,**  **R, 0.**  **Se,**



### Your dtrntioa ir reepretfdll laagwge OS Texar &u’ rlrprudmr~, Vole 8 i din&o4 to the
, p. 218, woo 1148 *In @a@0 o fl 

### onfliot

botwwa 

### 8 ganerd p r wlr l o a a n d l 

### qmaial prwlrlon doallng with the **mmo rubjest,**  **the former**  **51** l **ontrollrd or** 

-..-.

### Ion. 0. 1. wll40,l)ohruuy 80, 1939,Pago 8 llmlto6 by tho lottori

on4 tbio io oo ubotbor tbm prorlolono ln quo8tlom ore l o at alw d

l8 t he o o mm m o t or l a4lfformnt l ooo tw e at s .

I n 0th~ wrdo, when l l



## totuto maker a geaoral 

### ~rovlrlon 

## l

pp8rontlJ for all aan0 lad 8 ape 

### iid ~ro~irlota f or l p0rti0ul8r 0000 or 01000, **tbo** fmramr **floldm and**  the latter prerallo lo 00 iu es tbo putloulu worn or 01880 

### lo oonOO?EO& 

## h m ob

l 1FOUUtOLI0.8, 

### tbo 

## l

pookal prWi8tw 

### or statute 10 rmgUb& 08 

### thou& It 

## w r eo n l xoeptlon or &VlW180, rwwlng SWtbiy trw tb0 operation or tb0 gmnu8l lw.9
YOU le, thUdU8, *P V 1 BO d it t o Qulí

p inio n 

### tbo proti8ioao of Artiolo Sol28 

### uould oontrol, 

### u&d tbo oounty wuld k preolmded tram paylnp the 8ount.j Judge*@ 

### 8tenogmpher ln ozoeoo of Tm01va 

### Shadred (#l800.00)DolXu8perteu. . Yory 

### trulypun
Exhibit
99.2








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of
Sweetwater Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended September
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Jose Madappilly, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

















Jose
Madappilly


Chief
Executive Officer,


President
and Director











-1-
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5934 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5934

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 105 Highway 297 North in Dyess, Arkansas, as the ``Johnny Cash Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2018

 Mr. Crawford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 105 Highway 297 North in Dyess, Arkansas, as the ``Johnny Cash Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHNNY CASH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 105 Highway 297 North in Dyess, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Johnny Cash Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Johnny 
Cash Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

 

 National Institute for Occupational

 Safety and Health

 Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway

 Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998

 Phone: 877-222-7570

 Fax: 513-533-6826

 

 August 24, 2010 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00140 

Ms. Rachel Leiton

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Room C-4511 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the University of Rochester Atomic Energy Project in Rochester, New 

York, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On July 13, 2010, as provided for under 

42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an 

addition to the SEC: 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its 

contractors and subcontractors who worked at the University of Rochester Atomic 

Energy Project in Rochester, New York, from September 1, 1943 through October 

30, 1971, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, 

occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days 

within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in 

the SEC. 

This designation became effective on August 12, 2010, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on August 12, 2010, members of this class of employees, defined 

as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

 Sincerely, 

 

 [Signature on file]

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director 

 Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 13, 2016

Order 

Clerk

May 13, 2016

152753

STAR TICKETS, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 152753

v COA: 322371

Oakland CC: 2014-138263-CB

CHUMASH CASINO RESORT, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Status of Upcoming SEC 

Petitions

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

August 2011

Richland, WA 
Purpose

 Provide an update to the Advisory Board on 

the current number of qualified petitions 

under evaluation and sites being evaluated 

through the 83.14 process.

 Provide SEC information to the Advisory 

Board in support of its preparations for 

future Work Group sessions and Advisory 

Board meetings.
SEC Summary Table

(as of August 1, 2011)

 Petitions received 190

 Petitions in qualification process 5

 Petitions qualified for evaluation 113

• NIOSH evaluation in progress 1

• NIOSH evaluation completed 112

– SEC Evaluation Reports 

with the Advisory Board 

for recommendation 15

 Petitions not qualifying for evaluation 72

Note: Petitions not qualifying include five petitions received prior to the 

rule becoming final and Petition 34 where the site was de-listed. 
SEC Petition Currently in the 

Evaluation Process

 Clinton Engineering Works (CEW)

• All guards and service workers who worked in or around 

the warehouses at the Elza Gate area of Clinton 

Engineering Works from January 1, 1943 through May 18, 

1947

• Date received: July 8, 2010

• Expected completion: NIOSH is waiting for a facility 

designation determination from DOL
SEC Petition Evaluation Continues

 The following sites have evaluations that were 

partially completed and NIOSH has committed to 

continue evaluation

• Grand Junction Operations Office

—February 1, 1975 through July 31, 2010

—Expected completion: October 2011

• Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM 

—Post 1960 period

—Expected completion: March 2012
SEC Petitions in Qualification

 The following sites have petitions undergoing 

qualification

• Pinellas Plant (Clearwater, Florida)

• Hanford (Richland, Washington)

• Sandia National Laboratory (Albuquerque, NM)

• Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oak Ridge, TN)

• Titanium Alloys Manufacturing (Niagara Falls, NY)
EXHIBIT 32

MYSKIN, INC.

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of MySkin,
Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | 
| | --- | 

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|May 17, 2013                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                 | 
|                                                                 | 
|/s/ Marichelle Stoppenhagen                                      | 
|Name: Marichelle Stoppenhagen
        Title: CEO, President& CFO | 
|                                                                 |
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I, John D. Thomas, Principal Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer of Fuelstream, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form10-K of the Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; and

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

 

Date: May 22, 2015

 

/s/ John D. Thomas	

John D. Thomas

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of the Powerdyne International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:





The Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No.1) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/   Dale Euga

President, Director,

Chief Executive Officer





Date: December 23, 2011
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

***Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

 

I,Joel Boyarski, the Chief Financial Officer of WorldGate Communications, Inc.,hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Form 10-K of WorldGate Communications, Inc., for the annual period endedDecember 31, 2004 (the “December 31, 2004 Form 10-K”), which this certificationaccompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and informationcontained in the December 31, 2004 Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldGateCommunications, Inc.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to WorldGate and will be retained by WorldGate and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:  August  29, 2005 |   /s/ JOEL  BOYARSKI          |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                          |   Joel Boyarski               |
|                          |   Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations found on
pages F-3 and F-4 of the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             129,640
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      595,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        632,902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,505,708
<PP&E>                                           3,018,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (609,242)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,955,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,608,759
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              4
<COMMON>                                             4,059
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,980,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,955,849
<SALES>                                          3,344,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,344,559
<CGS>                                            2,885,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,503,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,158,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,158,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,158,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.37)




</TABLE>
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 21.2

                       SUBSIDIARIES - AS OF March 25, 2002

1.   Hillman Group Capital Trust (formerly SunSource Capital Trust)
     Organized in the State of Delaware

2.   Hillman Investment Company (formerly SunSource Investment Company, Inc.)
     Incorporated in the State of Delaware

3.   The Hillman Group, Inc.
     Incorporated in the State of Delaware

     a.   SunSource Technology Services, L.L.C.
          Incorporated in the State of Delaware

     b.   SunSource Integrated Services
          de Mexico S. A. DE C. V.
          Incorporated in Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

     c.   SunSub C, Inc.
          Incorporated in the State of Delaware

          i.   SunSub Holdings L.L.C.
               Incorporated in the State of Nevada

     d.   The Hillman Group Canada, Ltd.
          Incorporated in the Province of Ontario
EXHIBIT 21.1

   PRO-FAC COOPERATIVE, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Curtice Burns Export Corporation
Kennedy Endeavors, Inc.
Seasonal Employers, Inc.
CBF Company of Canada Limited
Linden Oaks Corporation
Birds Eye de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
BEMSA Holding, Inc.
Agrilink Foods, Inc.
PF Acquisition II, Inc.