alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1485 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1485

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 1999

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to confer United States 
  citizenship automatically and retroactively on certain foreign-born 
           children adopted by citizens of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adopted Orphans Citizenship Act''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP BY CERTAIN ADOPTED 
              CHILDREN.

    (a) Amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act.--Section 301 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subsection (g);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subsection (h) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(i) an unmarried person, under the age of 18 years, born 
        outside the United States and its outlying possessions and 
        thereafter adopted by at least one parent who is a citizen of 
        the United States and who has been physically present in the 
        United States or one of its outlying possessions for a period 
        or periods totaling not less than 5 years prior to the adoption 
        of the person, at least 2 of which were after attaining the age 
        of 14 years, if--
                    ``(1) the person is physically present in the 
                United States with the citizen parent, having attained 
                the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 
                residence;
                    ``(2) the person satisfied the requirements in 
                subparagraph (E) or (F) of section 101(b)(1); and
                    ``(3) the person seeks documentation as a United 
                States citizen while under the age of 18 years.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to persons adopted before, on, or after the date of 
enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate October 26, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTONIO GARCIA-VIRREY, ) No. 12-70213 ) Petitioner, ) Agency No. A090-065-343 ) v. ) MEMORANDUM * ) LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney ) General, ) ) Respondent. ) ) On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 1, 2015 ** Pasadena, California Before: FERNANDEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, *** District Judge. Antonio Garcia-Virrey, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the 

# FILED
JUN 16 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Rosemary Marquez, Di strict Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) deni al of his application for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). We deny the petition. Garcia asserts that his procedural due process rights 1 were violated when the Immigration Judge (IJ) admitted a police report into evidence at his cancellation hearing without requiring cross-examination of the officer who prepared the report. 2See Vilchez v. Holder , 682 F.3d 1195, 1198–99 (9th Cir. 2012); Espinoza v. INS , 45 F.3d 308, 310–11 (9th Cir. 1995); Cunanan v. INS , 856 F.2d 1373, 1374–75 (9th Cir. 1988); see also Cinapian v. Holder , 567 F.3d 1067, 1074 (9th Cir. 2009). We disagree. There wa s no evidence that the officer’s own observations (for example the strong odor of alcohol) were not trustworthy. Thus, those would be admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence, 3 which are more stringent than the rules applied in these proceedings. 4 More importantly, it does not appear that the BIA 5 relied on any improper material in that report. Thus, even

1 SeeTorres-Aguilar v. INS , 246 F.3d 1267, 1270–71 (9th Cir. 2001). 2 We note that the IJ did not deny cross-examination; he indicated that he would resolve the issue if it was raised late r in the proceedings. It was not raised. 3 SeeFed. R. Evid. 803(8)(A). 4 See, e.g. , Cinapian , 567 F.3d at 1074; Espinoza , 45 F.3d at 310; Cunanan , 856 F.2d at 1374. 5 SeeVilchez , 682 F.3d at 1199. 2if there were some unfairness, 6 the error, if any, was not prejudicial. 7 Petition DENIED.

6 Seeid.
7 Seeid. 3
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193273) and Amendment No. 467 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


December 23, 2015
Exhibit 11.1
                          Computation of Loss Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          Period from
                                                            Years Ended                   July 1, 1994
                                              ------------------------------------       (commencement)
                                                 December 31,        December 31,            through
                                                    1998                  1997          December 31, 1998
                                              ---------------      ---------------      -----------------
<S>                                           <C>                  <C>                  <C>              
Loss for the period                           $     3,389,208      $     4,306,897      $      10,476,675
                                              ===============      ===============      =================
Shares used in computing loss per share:
    Weighted average shares
    outstanding (Note 1)                          20,056,945            17,724,935             13,385,985
                                              ==============       ===============      =================
Loss per share                                $         0.17       $          0.24      $            0.78
                                              ==============       ===============      =================


Note 1:   Due to the net losses incurred during each of the periods presented,
          common share equivalents are anti-dilutive and have been excluded from
          the computation.
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT (4)(g)



 CONTRACT DATA PAGE 

 

			
	Contract Number:  [P9999999999]	  	Contract Date:  [May 2, 2014]

  

					
	Owner:  [JOHN DOE]	  	[Date of Birth:  [March 1, 1976]	  	Age at Issue:  [38]]
			
	[Owner:  [JANE DOE]	  	Date of Birth:  [June 10, 1976]	  	Age at Issue:  [37]]
			
	Annuitant:  [JOHN DOE]	  	Date of Birth:  [March 1, 1976]	  	Age at Issue:  [38]
			
	[Annuitant:  [JANE DOE]	  	Date of Birth:  [June 10, 1976]	  	Age at Issue:  [37]]

 Beneficiary: As named by You 

Initial Purchase Payment:  [$25,000.00] 

Maximum Purchase Payment Without Our Approval:  [$1,000,000] 

Purchase Payment Age Limit:  [Prior to the 86th birthday] 

Minimum Subsequent Purchase Payment:  [$500] 

Fixed Account Option(s) Minimum Guaranteed Interest Rate:  [1.0% - 3.0%] 

Minimum Partial Withdrawal Amount:  [$1,000] 

Maximum Penalty-Free Withdrawal Percentage:  [10%] 

Minimum Systematic Withdrawal Amount:  [$100] 

Minimum Amount Remaining After Any Partial Withdrawal:  [$2,500] 

Withdrawal Charge Schedule: 
  





 
 See Page [11] for Withdrawal Provisions. 
  

  

			
	AG-803-PPS7 (7/13)	  	3









 CONTRACT DATA PAGE (Cont’d.) 

[Premium Tax:  None] 
 Minimum Transfer
Amount:  [$100] 
 Separate Account Charge [(including guaranteed death benefit risk charge of  [0.10%])]: [1.15%]

 Annual Contract Maintenance Fee:  [$50] 

Transfer Fee:  [$25] 
 Earliest Annuity Date
After the Contract Date:  [Two years] 
 Latest Annuity Date:  [1st day
of the month following Your 95th Birthday] 
 Separate Account:  [Variable Separate
Account] 
  
 



 

  

			
	AG-803-PPS7 (7/13)	  	4
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Malikh Evans, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Marc J. Whiten, J.), rendered May 11, 2011, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Marc J. Whiten, J.), rendered May 11, 2011, affirmed.</p><p>Since defendant waived his right to prosecution by information, the accusatory instrument only had to satisfy the reasonable cause requirement (<i>see People v Dumay</i>, 23 NY3d 518, 522 [2014]). So viewed, the accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective, since it sufficiently alerted defendant to the charged crime, specified information from which his knowledge and intent could be inferred, and provided reasonable cause to believe that defendant was guilty of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third-degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 170.20). Factual allegations that the 54 counterfeit bills recovered from the glove compartment of defendant's vehicle had a "texture ... unlike the texture of authentic [U.S.] currency," with an "uneven" cut of the paper, "white around the edge of the bills" and "no water mark," warranted the inference that defendant knew the bills were counterfeit (<a href="../2011/2011_00037.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Bogan</i>, 80 AD3d 450</a> [2011], <i>lv denied </i>16 NY3d 856 [2011]). </p><p>In addition, at the pleading stage, defendant's intent to defraud, deceive or injure another may be inferred from his conduct and the surrounding circumstances (<i>see People v Bracey</i>, 41 NY2d 296, 301 [1977]), including the sheer number of counterfeit bills (<i>cf. People v Bailey</i>, 13 NY3d 67 [2009] [at trial, defendant's intent could not be presumed from his possession of three counterfeit bills in a shopping district]), concealment of the bills in a moving vehicle, and the lack of any reason for defendant to possess and furtively move this quantity of counterfeit bills other than that they be used for fraudulent purposes (<i>see People v Rodriguez, </i>17 NY3d 486 [2011]; <a href="../2007/2007_10501.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Dallas</i>, 46 AD3d 489</a>, 491 [2007], <i>lv denied</i> 10 NY3d 809 [2008]). No additional evidentiary details were required for the People's pleading to provide "adequate notice to enable defendant to prepare a defense and invoke his protection against double jeopardy" (<a href="../2014/2014_02103.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Kasse</i>, 22 NY3d 1142</a>, 1143 [2014]). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: December 28, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 13.1


                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                           BLUEPHOENIX SOLUTIONS LTD.

         In connection with the annual report of BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Arie Kilman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                /s/ Arie Kilman
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Arie Kilman
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                May 27, 2004
|    
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Scott Cramer, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Affinity Mediaworks Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)       

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2010, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

By:

*/s/ Scott Cramer*

 

Name:

Scott Cramer

 

Title:

Chief Executive Officer and

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Date:

December 20, 2010

 

 

 

                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001030418
<NAME> BIONX IMPLANTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,186,487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,980,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                   440,698
<INVENTORY>                                  7,773,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,669,166
<PP&E>                                       4,540,722
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,817,664)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,421,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,113,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,478
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,976,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,421,175
<SALES>                                     20,450,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,068,164
<CGS>                                        5,857,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,083,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (466,197)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (223,325)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (247,502)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,399,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    63,175
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,463,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,463,113)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.39)


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00078-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 2

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1667640D

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

APRYL BETH CALLISON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has moved to dismiss her appeal. Because we have not yet decided 

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: June 1, 2023
**Exhibit
31.2**
 
 **Rule
13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer**
 
 I,
William Danis, certify that:
 
 1. I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Med-Emerg International Inc.;
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fiscal year that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date: 
March 30, 2005
  /s/
      William DanisWilliam
      DanisChief
      Financial Officer