alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1028-1029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-104]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a change in the membership of the Senior 
Executive Service Performance Review Board for the Chemical Safety and 
Hazard Investigation Board (CSB).

DATES: Effective January 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Office of 
General Counsel, (202) 261-7600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(1) requires each agency to 
establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of 
Personnel Management, a performance review board (PRB). The PRB reviews 
initial performance ratings of members of the Senior Executive Service 
(SES) and makes recommendations as to final annual performance ratings 
for senior executives. Because the CSB is a small independent Federal 
agency, the SES members of the CSB's PRB are drawn from other Federal 
agencies.
    The Chairperson of the CSB has appointed the following individual 
to the CSB Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board:
    PRB Member--Gary L. Halbert, General Counsel, National 
Transportation Safety Board.
    Mr. Halbert replaces Curtis Bowling (Director of Environmental 
Readiness and Safety, Office of the Secretary of Defense/Chairman, 
Department of

[[Page 1029]]

Defense Explosives Safety Board). The service of Mr. Bowling on the PRB 
has come to a close. His appointment was originally announced in the 
Federal Register of November 15, 2007 (72 FR 64192).
    William B. Wark (CSB Board Member) continues to serve as the Chair 
of the PRB, as announced in the Federal Register of November 15, 2007 
(72 FR 64192). David Capozzi (Executive Director, United States Access 
Board) continues to serve as a Member of the PRB, as announced in the 
Federal Register of December 5, 2008 (73 FR 74138).
    This notice is published in the Federal Register pursuant to the 
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: January 4, 2010.
Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,
Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-104 Filed 1-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
J

- A02028

- 18

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
D.D.

v. C.T. Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1250 WDA 2017 Appeal from the Order Dated July 14, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Family Court at No(s): FD13

- 004954

- 009

BEFORE: BOWES, J., OLSON, J., and KUNSELMAN, J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY OLSON , J.: FILED JANUARY 18, 2018 Appellant, C.T. (Mother), appeals from the July 14, 2017 order that denied Mother’s relocation to North Carolina with the five

- year - old daughter she parents with D.D. (Father). After careful review, we are constrained to dismiss this appeal.
Gen erally, appellate briefs are required to conform to the Rules of Appellant Procedure. See Pa.R.A.P. 2101. “This Court may ... dismiss an appeal if the appellant fails to conform to the requirements set forth in the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure .” In re Ullman , 995 A.2d 1207, 1211 (Pa. Super. 2010) (citation omitted), appeal denied , 20 A.3d 489 (Pa. 2011). Our rules require that the statement of questions involved “must state concisely the issues to resolved” and the argument section of an
appe llant’s brief shall include “such discussion and citation of authorities as are deemed pertinent.” Pa.R.A.P. 2116(a), 2119(a).J

- A02028

- 18

- 2

-

In this case, Mother appears to allege that the trial court erred in treating this matter as a relocation case and, furthermore , incorrectly determined that Father possessed custody rights with respect to the couple’s child. See Mother’s Brief at 1, 5. However, Mother’s sta tement of questions involved is incoherent and her one - page argument contains nothing more than conclusory assertions, without any development or explanation as to why or how the trial court erred. It is axiomatic that this Court will not consider issues where the appellant has not developed her contentions in any meaningful way. In re Estate of Whitley , 50 A .3d 203, 209 (Pa. Super. 2012), appeal denied , 69 A.3d 303 (Pa. 2013). Furthermore, “[t]his Court will not act as counsel and will not develop arguments on behalf of an appellant.” Commonwealth v. Kane, 10 A.3d 327, 331 (Pa. Super. 2010) (citation omitte d), appeal denied, 29 A.3d 796 (Pa. 2011). Based on the foregoing, we are compelled to conclude that the defects in Mother’s brief are substantial and preclude this Court from conducting any meaningful appellate review. Accordingly, we elect to exercise our discretion pursuant to Rule 2101 and dismiss this appeal. Appeal dismissed.J

- A02028

- 18

- 3

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 1/18/2018
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 24707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0483]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Medical Device User Fee Cover 
Sheet--Form FDA 3601

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Medical Device User Fee Cover 
Sheet--Form FDA 3601'' has been approved by the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Gittleson, Office of 
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-5156, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d89cb9b6b1bdb4f69fb1acacb4bdabb7b698bebcb9f6b0b0abf6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d296b3bcbbb7befc95bba6a6beb7a1bdbc92b4b6b3fcbabaa1fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of January 19, 2010 
(75 FR 2866), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0511. 
The approval expires on February 28, 2013. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: April 29, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-10579 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Nigar Lila, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dolat Ventures, Inc

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant  as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and I have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to me, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles

c.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's forth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

By: /s/ Nigar Lila

Nigar Lila
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Date:
October 6, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Nathaniel Allen as President and CEO, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shade Down Under, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by       others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control financial reporting;  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 12, 2008 By: /s/ Nathaniel Allen Nathaniel Allen, President & CEO
EXHIBIT 31.1
 MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 José Rafael Fernández
     a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ José Rafael FernándezJosé Rafael FernándezPresident and Chief Executive Officer
A96A0510.

#### NEST INVESTMENTS, INC. v. TZAVARAS.

(471 SE2d 223)

Beasley, Chief Judge.

Nest Investments, Inc., brought this suit against Tzavaras and suffered summary judgment in favor of defendant. Nest’s appeal was dismissed due to inexcusable delay in transmission of the record to the appellate court caused by Nest’s failure to pay costs. Tzavaras subsequently moved for an award of attorney fees and litigation expenses under OCGA § 9-15-14.

On February 28, 1995, the trial court granted the motion and, on March 1, entered a supplemental order setting out findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of the award. Nest filed a motion to reconsider both orders. It also filed an application for discretionary appeal of the orders. While that application was pending, the trial court on April 14 granted the motion for reconsideration, thereby vacating and setting aside the February 28 and March 1 orders. Nest then withdrew its appeal application.

Defendant Tzavaras filed a motion for reconsideration of the April 14 order in the trial court and an application for discretionary appeal in this Court. We permitted the appeal, after which the trial court granted Tzavaras’ motion to reconsider, on June 8. Plaintiff Nest petitioned for discretionary appeal of the June 8 order. We granted that application and consolidated it with Tzavaras’ appeal.

By filing the applications for discretionary appeal, the parties moved the lawsuit to another level and divested the trial court of jurisdiction to enter the April 14 and June 8 orders. *Robinson v. Dept. of Corrections,*211 Ga. App. 134, 136 (1) (438 SE2d 190) (1993). “The filing of an application for appeal shall act as a supersedeas to the extent that a notice of appeal acts as supersedeas.” OCGA § 5-6-35 (h). According to OCGA § 5-6-46, the notice “has the effect of depriving the trial court of jurisdiction to modify or alter the judgment. [Cits.] . . . [But it] does not act as supersedeas except 'upon payment of all costs in the trial court by the appellant,’ OCGA § 5-6-46 (a), whereas there is no such requirement upon the filing of an application. [Cit.] The trial court costs do not have to be paid until the application is granted and the notice of appeal is filed. . . . OCGA § 5-6-35 (h) provides that it is the *filing*of the application, which of course occurs much earlier [than the *grant],*that acts as supersedeas.” (Emphasis in original.) *In the Interest of A. R. B.,*209 Ga. App. 324 (1), 325 (433 SE2d 411) (1993) (physical precedent only).

*Judgments reversed.*

*Birdsong, P. J., and Blackburn, J., concur.*

*283Decided March 27, 1996

Reconsideration dismissed May 6, 1996

*Morris L. Richman,*for appellant.

*McLarty, Robinson & Van Voorhies, John E. Robinson, Pratt H. Davis,*for appellee.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193276) and Amendment No. 321 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.












/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


December 23, 2015
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 53 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 033-27783) and Amendment No. 405 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


December 23, 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Selective Service System

# AGENCY:

Selective Service System.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

The following form has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for extension of clearance in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35):

## SSS FORM—404

*Title:*                     Potential Board Member Information.                

*Need and/or Use:*                     Is used to identify individuals willing to serve as members of local, appeal or review boards in the Selective Service System.                

*Respondents:*                     Potential board members.                

*Burden:*                     A burden of 15 minutes or less on the individual respondent.                

Copies of the above identified form can be obtained upon written request to the Selective Service System, Reports Clearance Officer, 1515 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2425.

Written comments and recommendations for the proposed extension of clearance of the form should be sent within 30 days of the publication of this notice to the Selective Service System, Reports Clearance Officer, 1515 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2425.

A copy of the comments should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer, Selective Service System, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 3235, Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: February 4, 2008.

Ernest E. Garcia,

Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. 08-762  Filed 2-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8015-01-M