alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
omy,

¢ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

cone,

“vera

National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

4676 Columbia Parkway

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998

Phone: 513-533-6825

Fax: 513-533-6826

October 3, 2005

Peter M. Turcic, Director

Division of Energy Employees Occupational
Illness Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

Room C-4511

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20210

Dear Mr. Turcic:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required
by 42 C.F.R. pt. 83.17(c), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a
class of employees at the lowa Army Ammunition Plant, in Burlington, Iowa as an addition to the
Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational IlIness Compensation
Program Act of 2000. On August 25, 2005, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the
Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

Department of Energy (DOE) employees or DOE contractor or subcontractor
employees who worked as radiographers from May 1948 to March 1949 in support of
Line | operations at the lowa Army Ammunition Plant and who were employed for a
number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring under this
employment in combination with work days of employment occurring within the
parameters (excluding aggregate work day requirements) established for other classes
of employees included in the SEC.

This designation became effective on September 24, 2005, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §
7384/(14)(C). Hence, beginning on September 24, 2005, members of this class of employees,
defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. pt. 83.16(b), the petitioners may contest the health endangerment

determination by submitting a challenge in writing within 30 days of receiving notice of the HHS
designation.

Sincerely,

KAM -
Larry J. Elliott, MSPH, CIH
Director

Office of Compensation
Analysis and Support
seavice,
et S4,

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

P3 4,
z 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46
= C Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

6

“ey,

(513) 533-6825

November 8, 2005

The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt

CHAIRMAN: .
Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Lafayette; Indiana Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
MEMBERS: Washington, DC 20201

Henry A. Anderson, M.D.

Madison, Wisconsin Dear Mr. Secretary:

Roy L. DeHart, M.D., M.P.H.

Meshwitey ‘Tenaanee The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has
Richard L. Espinosa evaluated SEC Petition -00044 concerning workers at Linde Ceramics Plant
a a eee in Niagara Falls, NY in. under the statutory requirements established by
Michael H. Gibson EEOICPA and incorporated into 42 CFR Sec. 83.13 (c) (1) and 42 CFR Sec.
ere ee 83.13 (c) (3). The Board respectfully recommends a Special Exposure
Mark A. Griffon Cohort be accorded to all Atomic Weapons Employees who worked at the
Salem) New Hampehire Linde Ceramics Plant from October 1, 1942 through October 31, 1947. and
James M. Melius, M.D., Ph.D. whom were employed for a number of work days aggregating at least 250
Mbany: New York work days, occurring under this employment or in combination with work
Wanda |. Munn days of employment occurring within the parameters (excluding aggregate
Ricans, Washington work day requirements) established for other classes of employees included
Charles L. Owens in the SEC. This recommendation is based on the following factors:
Paducah, Kentucky
Robert W. Presley e These workers were employed at a facility that processed substantial
clinton Telineseee! amounts of radioactive materials during the early time period for the
Genevieve S. Roesster, Ph.D. production of nuclear weapons.

Elysian, Minnesota

© Monitoring for internal dosimetry was not implemented at this facility
STAFF: until November 1947. The other monitoring, process, and source
information available for this facility is not sufficient for estimating
internal radiation exposures in order to conduct individual dose

Lewis V. Wade, Ph.D reconstruction for workers at this facility during the earlier time
Washington, DC period

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY:

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT : ¢ NIOSH has determined that the health of employees at this facility

LaShawn D. Shields may have been endangered by their radiation exposures. The Board
Atlanta, Georgia er
curs.


The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt November 8, 2005

Based on these considerations. the Board recommends that this Special Exposure Cohort petition be

granted.

Enclosed is supporting documentation from the Advisory Board Mecting held October 19. 2005 in
Knoxville, Tennessee. This documentation includes transcripts of the mecting, the petition, copies
of the petition and the NIOSH review thereof, and related documents distributed by NIOSII and the
petitioners. If any of these items are unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

LEZ

Paul L. Ziemer, Chairman
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Enc.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 4918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-345]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association

     Notice is hereby given that, on December 18, 2007, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Copy Control 
Association (``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, 3A Media Co., Ltd., Seoul, REPUBLIC OF 
KOREA; Ascent Media Group, LLC, Santa Monica, CA; Digital Networks 
North America, Inc., Cupertino, CA; and Ritek Corporation, Hsin chu, 
TAIWAN have been added as parties to this venture.
     Also, 2GeeksinaLab, Inc., Palmdale, CA; Conexant Systems, Inc., 
San Diego, CA; D-Link Systems, Inc., Fountain Valley, CA, DigiOn, Inc., 
Fukuoka, JAPAN; Dyntec Disc Production Co., Ltd., Nakhon Pathom, 
THAILAND; Futic Electronics Ltd., Chai Wan, HONG KONG-CHINA; Harbour 
Team Technologies Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Media 
READY, Inc., Fort Lauderdale, FL; OptiDisk Corporation, Anaheim, CA; 
OVK Optics Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; 
Shenzhen Mizuda AV Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and 
Zhongshan Worthy Electronics Industry Co., Ltd., Guangdong, PEOPLE'S 
REPUBLIC OF CHINA have withdrawn as parties to this venture
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
     On April 11, 2001 , DVD CCA filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
13, 2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 62865).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 08-345 Filed 1-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
No. 20

Herman Brettler, &c.,

Appellant,

v.

Allianz Life Insurance Company of

North America,

Respondent.

Ira S. Lipsius, for appellant.

Dawn Bell Williams, for respondent.

Certification of question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,

pursuant to section 500.27 of this Court's Rules of Practice, accepted and the issues

presented are to be considered after briefing an d argument. Acting Chief Judge Cannataro

and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Troutman concur.

Decided January 10, 2023
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 45 (Thursday, March 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 12177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-945]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE


Depository Library Council to the Public Printer Meeting

    The Depository Library Council to the Public Printer (DLC) will 
meet on Monday, March 31, 2008, through Wednesday, April 2, 2008, at 
Westin Crown Center, located in Kansas City, MO. The sessions will take 
place from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Wednesday. The meeting will 
be held at the Westin Crown Center, One Pershing Road, Kansas City, MO.
    The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the Federal Depository 
Library Program. All sessions are open to the public. The sleeping 
rooms available at the Westin Crown Center will be at the Government 
rate of $103.00 (plus applicable state and local taxes, currently 
15.22%) a night for a single or double. The Westin Crown Center is in 
compliance with the requirements of Title III of the Americans with 
Disabilities Act and meets all Fire Safety Act regulations.

Robert C. Tapella,
Public Printer of the United States.
[FR Doc. 08-945 Filed 3-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1520-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Forbes Energy Services Ltd. filed on Form 10-Q (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, L. Melvin Cooper, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ L. Melvin CooperL. Melvin CooperSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary


Date: November 13, 2009
Post-Effective Amendment No.29
to the Registration Statement
on Form N-1A(Securities Act
File No.2-57442,
Investment Company Act
File No. 811-2694)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under
the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the 1933 Act),
The Municipal Fund
Accumulation Program, Inc.
hereby certifies that:

(1)the form of Prospectus and
Statement of Additional
Information that would
have been filed pursuant
to Rule 497(c)under the 1933 Act
would not have differed from that
contained in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 29 to the Fund's
Registration Statement on
 Form N-1A; and

(2) the text of Post-Effective
Amendment No.29to the Fund's
Registration Statement on
Form N-1A was filed
electronically with the
Securities andExchange
 Commission on April 30, 2003.

Very truly yours,

The Municipal Fund
Accumulation Program, Inc.

/s/ Brian D. Stewart

Brian D. Stewart
Secretary of Fund
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRADLEY WESTON TAGGART,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

STUART M. BROWN,

 Defendant,

 And

TERRY W. EMMERT; KEITH JEHNKE;

SHERWOOD PARK BUSINESS

CENTER, LLC,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 12-35781

D.C. No. 3:12 cv-0236 MO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 16, 2014

Portland, Oregon

Before: ALARCÓN, TASHIMA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

FILED

MAY 22 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Defendants-Appellants appeal the district court’s decision reversing the

bankruptcy court and remanding for further proceedings. We dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).

“Our jurisdiction under section 158(d) . . . requires a final decision from the

district court.” Stanley v. Crossland, Crossland, Chambers, MacArthur & Lastreto

(In re Lakeshore Vill. Resort, Ltd.), 81 F.3d 103, 105 (9th Cir. 1996). Considering

“(1) the need to avoid piecemeal litigation; (2) judicial efficiency; (3) the systemic

interest in preserving the bankruptcy court’s role as the finder of fact; and (4)

whether delaying review would cause either party irreparable harm,” id. at 106

(citing Vylene Enters., Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In re Vylene Enters., Inc.), 968 F.2d

887, 895-96 (9th Cir. 1992)), we hold that the district court’s decision, which

remanded to the bankruptcy court for further factual findings, does not constitute a

final order under § 158(d). See Congrejo Invs., LLC v. Mann (In re Bender), 586

F.3d 1159, 1165-66 (9th Cir. 2009).

The appeal from the district court is hereby DISMISSED, and the case is

REMANDED for further proceedings. No costs.

2
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


Third Amendment


to


Employment Agreement







This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Second Amendment”), is being entered into effective December 14, 2015 by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Mr. Wayne Wetherell (the “Executive”).


                    


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2013 and subsequently amended on November 1, 2013 and January 9, 2015 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Executive continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and


 


WHEREAS, in consideration of the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present intent of the Company and the Executive.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the Employment Agreement, the parties do hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:








	
1.

	
Section “3. Term of Agreement” strike the language “continue until December 31, 2015” and replace it with “continue until December 31, 2016”.







 



	
2.

	
Except as expressly amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall continue and be in full force in all respects.



























/s/ S. James Miller                                                      /s/ Wayne Wetherell


ImageWare Systems, Inc.                                         Wayne Wetherell
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 11, 2013 

# Order

Clerk October 11, 2013

147700 ( 34 )

UAW, UAW LOCAL 6000, MICHIGAN

CORRECTIONS ORGANIZATION SEIU

LOCAL 526, MICHIGAN PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

SEIU LOCAL 517M, and MICHIGAN STATE

EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AFSCME

LOCAL 5

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ants

, SC: 147700

v COA: 314781

NINO ERWIN GREEN, EDWARD D.

CALLAGHAN, ROBERT LABRANT,

GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, and ATTORNEY

GENERAL

, Defendant s

- Appell ees

.

______________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Civil Service Commission to

participate in this matter as amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus curiae brief

submitted by the Civil Service Commission on October 4, 2013, fo r the Court’s

consideration in deciding the leave application is accepted for filing. On further order,

the motion of the Civil Service Commission to participate in oral argument is DENIED

without prejudice to filing a new motion if the matter is scheduled for oral argument.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1439

To terminate production under the D5 submarine-launched ballistic missile

program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 1999

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mr. HARKIN, and Mr. WELLSTONE) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Armed Services

A BILL

To terminate production under the D5 submarine-launched

ballistic missile program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF D5 SUBMARINE-LAUNCHED

4 BALLISTIC MISSILE PROGRAM.

5 (a) TERMINATION OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary of

6 Defense shall terminate production of D5 submarine bal7 listic missiles under the D5 submarine-launched ballistic

8 missile program.

9 (b) PAYMENT OF TERMINATION COSTS.—Funds

10 available on or after the date of the enactment of this Act
2

•S 1439 IS

1 for obligation for the D5 submarine-launched ballistic mis2 sile program may be obligated for production under that

3 program only for payment of the costs associated with the

4 termination of production under this Act.

5 (c) INAPPLICABILITY TO MISSILES IN PRODUC6 TION.—Subsections (a) and (b) do not apply to missiles

7 in production on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Comparison of ICRP 30 Models to Newer Models

David E. Allen, James W. Neton, and Larry J. Elliott

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Preventio

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway MS: R-45, Cincinn

• Annual organ dose is needed for a 

compensation decision under the United States Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA) of 2000.

• Internal doses have been calculated 

by various methods since the 1940s.

• The U.S. Department of Energy 

protection programs are currently regulated under ICRP 30 methods.

• Needed to compare ICRP 30 models 

to current ICRP models to determine effect of our dose calculation on the dose of record.

INTRODUCTION 

Live

Lun

Com(Sv)

New 

• New

may the si

• Diffe

organbioas

• New

dose 

• ICRP 

node allowappli

METHODS

LNET ETseq

ET1ET2

BBseq BB2 BB1

bbseq bb2 bb1

Al3 Al2 Al1

LNTH

Environment

GI tract

Extrathoracic

Thoracic

B

O

DY

F

L

U

I

D

S

a b

c d

e f

DN-P

DT-B

DP

h g

i

j

G

I

T

RAC

T

ICRP 66 ICRP 30

LUNG MODELS

Annual Lung dose per Bq intake

Pu-239 Class S

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Years post intake

Dose (Sv)

ICRP 30ICRP 66no lymph node

Annual Lung dose per Bq/day Urine

Pu-239 Class S

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Years post intake

Dose (Sv)

ICRP 30ICRP 66no lymph node

• Evaluated inhalation exposures for 

Pu-239

• Used ICRP recommended particle 

sizes (1 micron ICRP 30 and 5 micron ICRP 66)

• Used Cindy

© and IMBA-NIOSH

©

computer programs

• Compared annual and committed 

doses obtained from each model.

• Compared lung and metabolic organ 

doses as well as non metabolic organ doses.

• Compared doses for various solubility 

classes

Annual Liver dose per Bq intake

Pu-239 Class S

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Years post intake

Dose (Sv)

ICRP 30

ICRP 66

Annual Liver dose per Bq/day Urine

Pu-239 Class S

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Years post intake

Dose (Sv)

ICRP 30

ICRP 66
EXHIBIT 32

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Massey Exploration Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Hawitt, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of January, 2010.


/s/ Michael Hawitt
---------------------------------------------------
Michael Hawitt
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                         PalEx, Inc. and Subsidiaries
        Statement Regarding Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Share
                (In Thousands, except Share and Per Share Data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                              One Month
                                                                 Year Ended    Year Ended       Ended       Year Ended
                                                                November 30,  November 30,  December 31,   December 28,
                                                                    1995          1996          1996           1997
                                                                ------------  ------------  -------------  ------------
<S>                                                             <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>
Net Income (Loss)                                                 $    3,590    $    5,676    $      (66)   $     7,152
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                                6,054,446     6,054,446     6,054,446     11,937,724
                                                                  ----------    ----------    ----------    -----------
Shares used in computing Basic net income (loss) per share         6,054,446     6,054,446     6,054,446     11,937,724
                                                                  ==========    ==========    ==========    ===========
Basic net income (loss) per share                                 $     0.59    $     0.94    $    (0.01)   $      0.60
                                                                  ==========    ==========    ==========    ===========
Dilutive effect of outstanding options                                     0             0             0        352,218
Shares used in computing Diluted net income (loss) per share       6,054,446     6,054,446     6,054,446     12,289,942
                                                                  ==========    ==========    ==========    ===========
Diluted net income (loss) per share                               $     0.59    $     0.94    $    (0.01)   $      0.58
                                                                  ==========    ==========    ==========    ===========
</TABLE>


                             Exhibit 11.1 - Page 1