22740 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices 

1One hundred and twenty days from July 10, 

2010, is November 7, 2010, which is a Sunday. 

However, Department practice dictates that where 

a deadline falls on a weekend, the appropriate 

deadline is the next business day. See Notice of 

Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ 

Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines 

Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 

FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

1 Jingzhou Meihou made no subsequent 

shipments to the United States. 

International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, Import Administration; First 

Administrative Review of Steel Wire 

Garment Hangers from the People’s 

Republic of China: Selection of 

Respondents for Individual Review,’’ 

dated February 12, 2010. Between 

March 2010 and April 2010, the selected 

respondents submitted responses to the 

Department’s antidumping duty 

questionnaire, dated February 12, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to issue the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend this deadline to 

365 days. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of this administrative review 

within the time period set forth in the 

Initiation, as tolled. Specifically, we 

determine that it is not practicable to 

complete the preliminary results of this 

administrative review within the 

original time limit because the 

respondent selection process was 

complicated due to the conflicting 

comments submitted by interesting 

parties, and the Department requires 

additional time to analyze questionnaire 

responses, issue supplemental 

questionnaires, and evaluate surrogate 

value submissions for purposes of the 

preliminary results. 

Because the current deadline does not 

afford the Department adequate time to 

gather, analyze, request supplementary 

information, and review surrogate value 

information, the Department requires 

more time to complete the preliminary 

results. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the 

Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results within the original time period 

and is extending the time limit for 

issuing the preliminary results by 120 

days until November 8, 2010.1 The final 

results continue to be due 120 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: April 26, 2010. 

Edward C. Yang, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10182 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–922] 

Raw Flexible Magnets From the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation 

of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 30, 2010. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) has determined that a 

request for a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on raw flexible 

magnets (‘‘magnets’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) meets the 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

for initiation. The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) for the new shipper review is 

September 1, 2009, through February 

28, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Pandolph or Zhulieta 

Willbrand, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

4, Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, N.W., 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–3627, or (202) 482–3147, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The antidumping duty order on 

magnets from the PRC was published on 

September 17, 2008. See Antidumping 

Duty Order: Raw Flexible Magnets from 

the People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 

53847 (September 17, 2008). On March 

29, 2010, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR 

351.214(c), the Department received a 

timely request for a new shipper review 

from Jingzhou Meihou Flexible Magnet 

Company, Ltd. (‘‘Jingzhou Meihou’’). 

However, the company business 

proprietary version was not properly 

bracketed. The Department requested 

that Jingzhou Meihou resubmit the new 

shipper review request and noted that 

the resubmission would be considered 

timely for consideration of a new 

shipper review. See Memorandum to 

the File from Rebecca Pandolph, 

International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Order on Raw 

Flexible Magnets from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated April 5, 2010. 

On April 5, 2010, Jingzhou Meihou 

resubmitted its new shipper review 

request. Jingzhou Meihou certified that 

Jingzhou Meihou is both the exporter 

and producer of the subject 

merchandise upon which its request for 

a new shipper review was based. On 

April 23, 2010, Magnum Magnetics 

Corporation (‘‘Petitioner’’) submitted 

comments regarding the request for new 

shipper review by Jingzhou Meihou. 

The Department is currently evaluating 

the comments submitted by Petitioner 

and will address the comments during 

the new shipper review. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), 

Jingzhou Meihou certified that it did not 

export raw flexible magnets to the 

United States during the period of 

investigation (‘‘POI’’), i.e., January 1, 

2007 through June 30, 2007. Further, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), 

Jingzhou Meihou certified that, since 

the initiation of the investigation, it has 

never been affiliated with any PRC 

exporter or producer who exported 

magnets to the United States during the 

POI, including those not individually 

examined during the investigation. As 

required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), 

Jingzhou Meihou, also certified that its 

export activities were not controlled by 

the central government of the PRC. 

In addition to the certifications 

described above, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iv), Jingzhou Meihou 

submitted documentation establishing 

the following: (1) the date on which 

Jingzhou Meihou first shipped magnets 

for export to the United States and the 

date on which the magnets were first 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption; (2) the volume of its 

first shipment;1 and (3) the date of its 

first sale to an unaffiliated customer in 

the United States. 

The Department conducted a U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

database query and confirmed that 

shipment of subject merchandise from 

Jingzhou Meihou had entered the 

United States for consumption and that 

liquidation of such entry had been 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices 22741 

1This public document and all other public 

Departmental documents are available on the public 

record located within the Central Records Unit 

(CRU), Room 1117 of the Commerce building. 2The CVD POI was January 1, 2006, through 

December 31, 2006. 

properly suspended for antidumping 

duties. The Department also confirmed 

by examining CBP data that Jingzhou 

Meihou’s entry was made during the 

POR as specified by the Department’s 

regulations. See 19 CFR 

351.214(g)(1)(i)(B). After examining CBP 

data, the Department requested 

additional information from Jingzhou 

Meihou. See letter to Jingzhou Meihou 

regarding, ‘‘Request for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty New Shipper 

Review of Raw Flexible Magnets from 

the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated 

April 8, 2010. On April 12, 2010, 

Jingzhou Meihou submitted its response 

to the Department’s request for 

additional information. See Jingzhou 

Meihou’s letter regarding, ‘‘Request for 

More Information regarding Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

new Shipper Reviews of raw Flexible 

Magnets from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated April 12, 2010. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), 

the Department will publish the notice 

of initiation of a new shipper review no 

later than the last day of the month 

following the anniversary month or 

semiannual anniversary month of the 

order. Thus, the deadline for publishing 

this notice of initiation is April 30, 

2010. 

Initiation of New Shipper Reviews 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), the 

Department finds that Jingzhou Meihou 

meets the threshold requirements for 

initiation of a new shipper review of its 

shipment of magnets from the PRC. See 

Memorandum to the File through 

Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 4: Initiation of AD 

New Shipper Review of Jingzhou 

Meihou.: Raw Flexible Magnets from the 

People’s Republic of China, dated 

concurrently with this notice; and 

Jingzhou Meihou Checklist. 

The POR for the new shipper review 

of Jingzhou Meihou is September 1, 

2009, through February 28, 2010. See 19 

CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(B). The Department 

intends to issue the preliminary results 

of this review no later than 180 days 

from the date of initiation, and the final 

results of this review no later than 270 

days from the date of initiation. See 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. 

It is the Department’s usual practice, 

in cases involving non–market economy 

countries, to require that a company 

seeking to establish eligibility for an 

antidumping duty rate separate from the 

country–wide rate provide evidence of 

de jure and de facto absence of 

government control over the company’s 

export activities. Accordingly, we will 

issue a questionnaire to Jingzhou 

Meihou, which will include a separate 

rate section. The review of Jingzhou 

Meihou will proceed if the response 

provides sufficient indication that 

Jingzhou Meihou is not subject to either 

de jure or de facto government control 

with respect to its exports of magnets. 

We will instruct CBP to allow, at the 

option of the importer, the posting, until 

the completion of the review, of a bond 

or security in lieu of a cash deposit for 

certain entries of the subject 

merchandise from Jingzhou Meihou in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(e). 

Because Jingzhou Meihou certified that 

it both produces and exports the subject 

merchandise, the sales of which form 

the basis for its new shipper review 

request, we will instruct CBP to permit 

the use of a bond only for entries of 

subject merchandise which the 

respondent both produced and 

exported. 

Interested parties requiring access to 

proprietary information in this new 

shipper review should submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective order in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 

351.306. 

This initiation and notice are 

published in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: April 26, 2010. 

Edward C. Yang, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10176 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–923] 

Raw Flexible Magnets From the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation 

of Countervailing Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 30, 2010. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) has determined that a 

request for a new shipper review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on raw 

flexible magnets (RFM) from the 

People’s Republic of China (the PRC) 

meets the statutory and regulatory 

requirements for initiation. The period 

of review (POR) for the new shipper 

review is January 1, 2009, through 

February 28, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–4793. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The CVD order on RFM from the PRC 

was published on September 17, 2008. 

See Raw Flexible Magnets from the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Countervailing Duty Order, 73 FR 53849 

(September 17, 2008). On March 29, 

2010, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), and 19 CFR 351.214(c), the 

Department received a timely request 

for new shipper review from Jingzhou 

Meihou Flexible Magnet Company, Ltd. 

(Jingzhou Meihou). The company’s 

business proprietary version, however, 

was not properly bracketed. The 

Department, therefore, rejected that 

submission and requested that Jingzhou 

Meihou resubmit the request, which 

would be considered timely for 

consideration of a new shipper review. 

See Memorandum to the File from 

Kristen Johnson, Trade Analyst, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 3, regarding 

‘‘Jingzhou Meihou’s New Shipper 

Review Submission Rejected,’’ dated 

April 1, 2010.1 On April 5, 2010, 

Jingzhou Meihou resubmitted its new 

shipper review request. Jingzhou 

Meihou certified that it is both the 

exporter and producer of the subject 

merchandise upon which its request for 

a new shipper review is based. On April 

23, 2010, Magnum Magnetics 

Corporation (Petitioner) submitted 

comments regarding the request for new 

shipper review by Jingzhou Meihou. 

The Department is currently evaluating 

the comments submitted by Petitioner 

and will address the comments during 

the new shipper review. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), 

Jingzhou Meihou certified that it did not 

export RFM to the United States during 

the period of investigation (POI).2

Further, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Jingzhou Meihou 

certified that, since the initiation of the 

investigation, it has never been affiliated 

with any PRC exporter or producer who 

exported RFM to the United States 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1