alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11


 


Share Exchange Agreement


 


Transferor (Party A): KONG SOK KIN


 


Transferee (Party B): Gongqi Xiang


 


According to the resolution of the directors’
meeting of Wenzhou Xibolun Fluid Equipment Co., Limited on August 10, 2010, Party A and Party B agreed to reach following share
exchange agreement on August 10, 2010.


 


		1.	Party A transfers 30% of shares in Wenzhou Xibolun Fluid Equipment Co., Limited, Ltd. in value of
RMB 300,000 to Party B for the original price.



 


		2.	The consideration of share transfer will be delivered out of book within 30 days after the approval
of the industry and commerce bureau.



 


		3.	After the share transfer, Party A will no long possess any right and obligation regarding Wenzhou
Xibolun Fluid Equipment Co., Limited which will be possessed by Party B.



 


		4.	If any party violates this agreement, he should undertake following responsibility: the defaulting
party shall compensate any direct economic loss incurred by the violation to the non-defaulting party.



 


		5.	Any dispute shall be resolved by the court.



 


		6.	This agreement is effective after both parties sign it. It has 4 originals, with Party A, Party
B, the company and the industry and commerce bureau each holding one copy,.



 


Party A: /s/ KONG SOK KIN


 


Party B: /s/ Gongqi Xiang


 


2010-8-10
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 37 (Monday, February 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 10087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Meeting of the TVA Regional Resource Stewardship Council

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The TVA Regional Resource Stewardship Council (RRSC) will hold 
a meeting on March 13 and March 14, 2008, to obtain views and advice on 
the topic of TVA's Draft Environmental Policy & Framework and TVA's 
Natural Resources Management Strategy.
    The RRSC was established to advise TVA on its natural resource 
stewardship activities. Notice of this meeting is given under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, (FACA).
    The meeting agenda includes the following:
    (1) TVA Updates.
    (2) TVA's Draft Environmental Policy & Framework: Land & Water 
Stewardship Issues.
    (3) External Perspectives on Land & Water Stewardship Activities.
    (4) TVA Natural Resources Management Strategy.
    (5) Drought Conditions Updates.
    (6) Bear Creek Dam Update.
    (7) Public Comments.
    (8) Council Discussion and Advice.
    The TVA Regional Resource Stewardship Council will hear opinions 
and views of citizens by providing a public comment session. The public 
comment session will be held at 9:30 a.m., EDT, on Friday, March 14. 
Persons wishing to speak are requested to register at the door by 9 
a.m., EDT, on March 14 and will be called on during the public comment 
period. Handout materials should be limited to one printed page. 
Written comments are also invited and may be mailed to the Regional 
Resource Stewardship Council, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West 
Summit Hill Drive, WT 11B, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, March 13, 2008, from 8:30 
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., EDT, and on Friday, March 14, 2008, from 8:30 a.m. 
to 12:30 p.m., EDT.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Auditorium of the TVA 
Headquarters at 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902, 
and will be open to the public. Anyone needing special access or 
accommodations should let the contact below know at least a week in 
advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth Keel, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, 
WT 11B, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902, (865) 632-6113.

    Dated: February 19, 2008.
Peyton T. Hairston, Jr.,
Senior Vice President, Corporate Responsibility & Diversity, Tennessee 
Valley Authority.
[FR Doc. 08-799 Filed 2-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-M
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

BENJAMIN NAJERA, JR., Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 20-0460 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2005-048600-001 

The Honorable Peter A. Thompson, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker

Counsel for Respondent

Benjamin Najera, Jr., Florence

Petitioner

FILED 4-6-2021
STATE v. NAJERA 

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Paul J. McMurdie, Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, and Judge 

Lawrence F. Winthrop delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Benjamin Najera, Jr., seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is the petitioner’s fifth 

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden 

to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find the petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. 

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Tiger Acquisitions, Inc.,  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Jay Lutsky,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Jay LutskyJay Lutsky, Chief Financial Officer November 13, 2008
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-09-00684- CV

Ticole Taylor, Appellan t

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 146 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 230 ,270 -B , H ONO RAB LE RICK MO RRIS, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Ticole Tay lor appea led the order terminating her pare ntal rig hts. She asser ted in her motion for new trial and her statement of points on appea l tha t the judgme nt w as not suppor ted by leg ally or fac tually sufficie nt evidenc e. The trial court found her indige nt, but found that her appea l

was frivolous, and declined to or der prepa ration of a repor

ter’s rec ord without c ost. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. C o d e An n . § 1 3.003 (West 2002); Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405 (West 2008). Ba sed on a revie w of documents in the cl er k ’s re cord, this Court aff irmed the finding that her appea l was frivolous, and let the appea l proce ed to the merits. Tay lor did not pay for prepa

ration of

a repor ter’s rec ord and failed to file a brief. We abate d this appea l and rema nded for a hear ing befor e the trial cour

t to determine whe ther Ta y lor desire d to pursue this appea l. Tay lor did not appea

r at the hear ing. Her trial counsel—who filed the motio n for new tria l, the statement of points on appe al, and the a ppellate doc keting statement—appe are d andconfirme d with the trial court that , wh en the trial court found Tay lor’s appea l frivolous, the trial co u rt d i d n o t appoint him or any one to repr esent Tay lor on appea l. Counsel stated that

never theless, befor e the November 2010 hear ing on whether Tay lor wanted to pursue the appea l, he contac ted Tay

lor throug h information from her parole office r. Counsel stated that he mailed Tay lor

a letter at the addr ess provided w hich informed he r of the hear ing date, place , and time, a nd stated plainly , “I f y ou want to appea l y our case y ou must be in court on the above date.” Counsel stated that Tay lor called him a “couple of differ ent times” at which time he explained to her the importance of appea ring at the hear ing. Counsel told the trial court that, at first, Tay lor said she was not g oing to appea r but later sa id she planned to come to the hearing

. The trial court then found t hat Tay lor had aba ndoned the a

ppeal. Fr om the rec ord befor e us, we conclude that Tay lor has abandone d this appea l. She has not filed a brief or otherwise contac ted this Court conce rning her appea l, which has been pending since Dec ember 3, 2009. There is no indication that she contac ted the trial court reg arding pursuing her ap p ea l

. S h e did not appea r at the trial court hear ing set to deter mine whether she desired to pursue the a

ppeal de spite being told by her f ormer c ounsel that she must do so in order to appe al. We dismi ss this appeal for want of pr osecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).

Diane H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Henson Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: De cembe r 17, 2010 2
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such
evaluation; and




---



##### 



d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: November 15, 2010
    By:
    /s/ KELLY ANDERSONKELLY ANDERSONExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000533

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

ESTATE OF KIMO I. JARDIN, Claimant-Appellant-Appellee, v. STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Employer-Appellee-Appellant, Self-Insured, and STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT,

Adjuster-Appellee-Appellant SURVIVORS OF KIMO I. JARDIN, Claimant-Appellant-Appellee, v.

STATE OF HAWAII TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, Employer-Appellee-Appellant, Self-Insured, and STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT,

Adjusters-Appellee-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD

(CASE NO. AB 2018-123; DCD NO. 4-15-10033)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Wadsworth, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.) Upon consideration of Claimants-Appellants-Appellees Kimo I. Jardin and Survivors of Kimo I. Jardin's ( Jardin Parties ) January 27, 2023 Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction (Motion ), the papers in support and in opposition, and the record, it appears that the Jardin Parties seek dismissal of the appeal on the basis that the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board's ( LIRAB ) July 6, 2022 Proposed Decision and Order and August 9, 2022 Order Adopting Proposed Decision and Order (together, Orders ) appealed from are not final, appealable orders because they determine that the underlying claims are compensable, but they do not determine the amount of compensation. Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-22-0000533 28-FEB-2023 10:28 AM Dkt. 87 OGMDNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

An aggrieved party may appeal from a final decision and order by the LIRAB directly to this court under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS ) §§ 386-88 (2015) and 91-14 (2012). For purposes of HRS § 91-14(a), "final order" means "an order ending the proceedings, leaving nothing further to be accomplished[;] . . . Consequently, an order is not final if the rights of a party involved remain undetermined or if the matter is retained for further action." Bocalbos v. Kapiolani Med. Ctr. for Women & Child. , 89 Hawai i 436, 439, 974 P.2d 1026, 1029 (1999) (cleaned up). Thus, a LIRAB decision merely "finding a workers' compensation claim to be compensable [is] not an appealable final order because the amount of compensation ha[s] yet to be determined." Id. (citing Williams v. Kleenco , 2 Haw. App. 219, 629 P.2d 125 (1981)).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted, and appellate case No. CAAP-22-0000533 is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, February 28, 2023. /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Presiding Judge /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

2
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ronald Williams, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DRC Ventures, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DRC Ventures, Inc.





Dated: May 17, 2011
By:
/s/ Ronald WilliamsName:
Ronald WilliamsTitle:
President, Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Yunjie Fang, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HQ Global Education Inc. for the quarter ended November 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HQ Global Education Inc.




Dated: January 17, 2012/s/ Yunjie FangChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to HQ Global Education Inc. and will be retained by HQ Global Education Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 45 (Thursday, March 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 12221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-942]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION


Fee Rate

AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 25 CFR 514.1(a)(3), that 
the National Indian Gaming Commission has adopted preliminary annual 
fee rates of 0.00% for tier 1 and 0.057% (.00057) for tier 2 for 
calendar year 2008. These rates shall apply to all assessable gross 
revenues from each gaming operation under the jurisdiction of the 
Commission. If a tribe has a certificate of self-regulation under 25 
CFR part 518, the preliminary fee rate on class II revenues for 
calendar year 2008 shall be one-half of the annual fee rate, which is 
0.0285% (.000285)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kwame Mainoo, National Indian Gaming 
Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; 
telephone (202) 632-7003; fax (202) 632-7066 (these are not toll-free 
numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) 
established the National Indian Gaming Commission which is charged 
with, among other things, regulating gaming on Indian lands.
    The regulations of the Commission (25 CFR part 514), as amended, 
provide for a system of fee assessment and payment that is self-
administered by gaming operations. Pursuant to those regulations, the 
Commission is required to adopt and communicate assessment rates; the 
gaming operations are required to apply those rates to their revenues, 
compute the fees to be paid, report the revenues, and remit the fees to 
the Commission on a quarterly basis.
    The regulations of the Commission and the preliminary rate being 
adopted today are effective for calendar year 2008. Therefore, all 
gaming operations within the jurisdiction of the Commission are 
required to self administer the provisions of these regulations, and 
report and pay any fees that are due to the Commission by March 31, 
2008.

    Dated: February 28, 2008.
Philip N. Hogen,
Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. 08-942 Filed 3-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-07-M
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 83 (Friday, April 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 22872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12098 and <greek-i>12099]


Rhode Island Disaster Number RI-00006

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Rhode Island (FEMA-1894-DR), dated 03/
29/2010.
    Incident: Severe storms and flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/12/2010 and continuing through 04/12/2010.
    Effective Date: 04/12/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/28/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Rhode Island, dated 03/29/2010 is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
03/12/2010 and continuing through 04/12/2010.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator
    for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-10050 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ARC. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                           |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Myron M. Stadnyk                                      |   |   |
|                                                           |   |   |
| Name:  Myron M. Stadnyk                                   |   |   |
| Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|                                                           |   |   |

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement  (Form S-4 No.  333-45457)  of our report  dated  March 15,  2000 with
respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of  Amscan
Holdings,  Inc.  included  in the Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

                                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 24, 2000