alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Foye 12-3-03

7M: 28 Ar
December 3, 2003
Department of Health and Human Services
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Robert A. Taft Laboratories
MS-C34
4676 Columbia Parkway
Cincinnati, OH 45226 VIA '$13)533-8285
RE:
¢ Public Docket Number 021--Comments for the Y-12 National Security Complex
Documents
« Public Docket Number 023--Comments for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Documents
Dear Sir/Madam:
Iam a claimant under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act
(EEOICPA). My mother worked for Y-12 and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(X-10) . Ihave reviewed the Y-12 and X-10 Technical Basis Documents which are

currently posted on the NIOSH website. Three of the buildings in which my mother worked are
not mentioned in the Documents, as listed below:

Y-12
Building 9733-4, I could not find mention of this building anywhere in the Y-12 Technical
Basis Document.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10)

Buildings 9733-1 and 9733-2. It is my interpretation that the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Technical Basis Document intended to list every building on the site in its Oak Ridge National
Laboratory Facility Index - Appendix 2A. Buildings 9733-1 and 9733-2 are not listed in
Appendix 2A and I could not find them in the main text. I read in the Document that the 9000
series buildings for X-10 are actually located at Y-12. However, these buildings are not
mentioned in the Y-12 Document either.

Please advise me as to what assumptions will be made during dose reconstruction since no
information is given in the Technical Basis Documents for these workplaces.

Sincerelv.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------
[KPMG LLP letterhead]




ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

To the Trustees of Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-18809, 333-18809-01, 333-18809-02, 333-18809-03 and 333-18809-04 on Form S-3
of Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital
Trust I, Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust II, Hawaiian Electric
Industries Capital Trust III and HEI Preferred Funding, LP of our report dated
January 24, 2000, relating to the balance sheets of Hawaiian Electric Industries
Capital Trust I as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of
earnings, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the period from February 4, 1997 (inception) to
December 31, 1997, which report appears in this 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I.




/s/ KPMG LLP


Honolulu Hawaii
March 17, 2000
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED B RANDIN D. RONGSTAD , A ppellant , v. Case No. 5D 21
- 1212 LT Case No. 2014
- 301259
- CFDB STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ______________________________/ Decision filed May 17, 2022 3.850 A ppeal f rom the C ircuit C ourt for Volusi a County , Matthew M. Fo xman , Judge. Brandin D

. R ongstad, C hipley, p ro se. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d P amela J

. K oller, Assistant A ttorney G eneral, D aytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

CO HEN , HARRIS and SASSO , JJ., concur.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/15/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

JOE DON SMITH,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

STATE OF UTAH; UTAH COURT

OF APPEALS,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-4138

(D.C. No. 93-CV-762)

(Dist. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

Mr. Smith brought this federal habeas corpus action when the state denied

his requests for a free transcript to assist his preparation for a state post-
-2-

conviction proceeding in which he sought to establish that he had been denied

effective assistance of counsel at his trial. The federal court ordered the state to

provide transcripts, which were subsequently supplied. Mr. Smith then brought a

motion for contempt on the ground that the transcripts were incomplete and had

been “doctored,” and requested the district court to grant further habeas relief.

The district court found that the transcripts had been provided within the

time allotted by its order. Mr. Smith has provided this court with no reason to

believe this conclusion is clearly erroneous. Even assuming the transcripts do not

accurately reflect the proceedings they purport to record, such errors or omissions

need not constitute contempt. Mr. Smith’s federal habeas claim rested on the

ground that an indigent prisoner appealing an adverse decision in a state

postconviction proceeding must be afforded appellate review as adequate and

effective as that provided a prisoner who has money to buy transcripts. See Long

v. District Court of Iowa, 385 U.S. 192, 194 (1966); Gardner v. California, 393

U.S. 367, 368 (1969). Mr. Smith received his requested transcript. “[T]here is no

constitutional right to a perfect transcript.” State v. Menzies, 845 P.2d 220, 241

(Utah 1992). Mr. Smith’s remedy for any errors or omissions in the transcript is

in state court.

We agree with the district court that Mr. Smith has not made the substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right necessary to obtain a certificate of
-3-

probable cause. We construe Mr. Smith’s application for a certificate of probable

cause as a motion for a certificate of appealability now required by 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2), see Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431, 434 (10th Cir. 1996), and we deny

it.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 142 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 142

   To amend section 842 of title 18, United States Code, relating to 
     recordkeeping requirements for explosive materials transfers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. Moynihan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 842 of title 18, United States Code, relating to 
     recordkeeping requirements for explosive materials transfers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS 
              TRANSFERS.

    Section 842(f) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the 
first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``require,'' and inserting ``require (''; 
        and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``) and transmitting a copy of each such record to 
        the Secretary''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyber Supply Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Maria Shostak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 13th day of October, 2009.



| | MARIA SHOSTAK                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Maria Shostak,                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cyber Supply Inc. and will be retained by Cyber Supply Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Peace Corps

          - 22 CFR Part 310

### CFR Correction

In Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300 to 1799, revised as of April 1, 2007, on page 49, the appendix to Part 310 is removed. 

[FR Doc. 08-55503 Filed 3-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD PAGE 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22
- 072 6 IN THE MATTER OF H. L. B. , A Youth in Need of Care.
**ORDER** Upon consideration of

C ounsel’s mo tion to withdraw as counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The response mus t be served upon all counsel of r ecord, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender’s Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Appellant at her last known address.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 22 2023

05/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0726
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

**Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code****, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of ARC EnergyTrust (“ARC”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, John P. Dielwart, President and Chief Executive Officer ofARC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of ARC.

 

 

| signed *“John P.  Dielwart”*    |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                      |   |   |
| Name: John P. Dielwart               |   |   |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
| March 26, 2010                       |   |   |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Foreign Agricultural Service

# AGENCY:

Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice.

The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), today accepted a petition, and began a review of a petition, for trade adjustment assistance by Birches Cranberry Company on behalf of cranberry producers in New Jersey. The Administrator will determine within 40 days whether or not increasing imports of cranberries contributed importantly to a greater than 15 percent decrease in the national average price of cranberries compared to the average of the 3 preceding marketing years. If a determination is affirmative, producers who produce and market cranberries in New Jersey will be eligible to apply to the Farm Service Agency for technical assistance at no cost and cash benefits.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Trade Adjustment Assistance Staff, FAS, USDA, at (202) 720-0638, or by e-mail at:                         *tradeadjustment@fas.usda.gov.*                         Additional program information can be obtained at the Web site for the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers program. The URL is                         *http://www.fas.usda.gov/​itp/​taa.*

Dated: April 27, 2010.

John D. Brewer,

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-10263 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

p1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

147720

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147720

COA: 313572

Berrien CC: 2009

- 005695

- FC

ANDRE JABREE MARSHALL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report of China
Fruits Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:April
29, 2011;By: /s/ Li, Lin Feng

Li, Lin Feng

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Uziel
Leibowitz, the President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director of
Fenario, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (1) the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Date:
October 23, 2009




By: /s/ Uziel
      LeibowitzName: Uziel
      LeibowitzTitle:
      President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director(Principal
      Executive, Financial & Accounting
Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
   SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of China Fruits Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
April 14,
2010                                                                                      By: /s/ Wang,
Yongcheng
 Wang, Yongcheng
 Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7645

CHARLIE SLOAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (7:10-cv-00301-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charlie Sloan seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Sloan has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 602 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 602

   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
               unique ZIP Code for Eastvale, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2017

 Mr. Calvert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
               unique ZIP Code for Eastvale, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, 
unique ZIP Code applicable to the area encompassing only Eastvale, 
California.
                                 <all>
```