Draft

Review of NIOSH’s White Paper: 

Internal Exposures to Thorium and its Progeny at the Kansas City 

Plant during Mg-Th Machining 

Contract Number 211-2014-58081

Prepared by 

Joyce Lipsztein, PhD 

S. Cohen & Associates 

1608 Spring Hill Road, Suite 400 

Vienna, Virginia 22182 

Saliant, Inc. 

5579 Catholic Church Road 

Jefferson, Maryland 21755 

May 2015 

Disclaimer 

This document is made available in accordance with the unanimous desire of the Advisory Board on 

Radiation and Worker Health (ABRWH) to maintain all possible openness in its deliberations. However, 

the ABRWH and its contractor, SC&A, caution the reader that at the time of its release, this report is predecisional and has not been reviewed by the Board for factual accuracy or applicability within the 

requirements of 42 CFR 82. This implies that once reviewed by the ABRWH, the Board’s position may 

differ from the report’s conclusions. Thus, the reader should be cautioned that this report is for 

information only and that premature interpretations regarding its conclusions are unwarranted.
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

2 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

S. COHEN & ASSOCIATES:

Technical Support for the Advisory Board on 

Radiation & Worker Health Review of

NIOSH Dose Reconstruction Program

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s

White Paper: Internal Exposures to 

Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Effective Date:

Draft – May 6, 2015

Revision No. 

0 (Draft)

Review of NIOSH’s White Paper: Internal 

Exposures to Thorium and its Progeny at the 

Kansas City Plant during Mg-Th Machining

Page 2 of 21

Task Manager:

__________________________Date:____________

Joseph Fitzgerald

Supersedes:

N/A

Project Manager:

__________________________Date:____________

John Stiver, MS, CHP

Reviewer(s):

 Joseph Fitzgerald

 John Stiver

Record of Revisions

Revision 

Number

Effective 

Date Description of Revision

0 (Draft) 05/06/2015 Initial issue
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

3 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................................... 4

1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 5

2.0 SC&A’s Findings ................................................................................................................. 7

3.0 Non-SEC Issues ................................................................................................................. 17

4.0 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 18

References ..................................................................................................................................... 20
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

4 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 

Advisory Board Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

AMAD Activity Median Aerodynamic Diameter 

Bq/mL becquerel per milliliter

Bq/y becquerel per year

BZ breathing zone 

cm2square centimeter 

DCF dose conversion factor

dpm/m3disintegrations per minute per cubic meter 

DU depleted uranium

ER Evaluation Report 

ET extrathoracic 

h/y hours per year

ICRP International Commission on Radiological Protection 

KCP Kansas City Plant

m

3

/h cubic meter per hour 

Mg-Th Magnesium-Thorium 

mL/h milliliter per hour 

μCi/ml microcuries per milliliter 

m/s meter per second 

NEA Negative Exposure Assessment 

NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

ORAUT Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team 

rem Roentgen equivalent man 

SC&A S. Cohen and Associates (SC&A, Inc.) 

SEC Special Exposure Cohort 

SRDB site research database 

Sv Sievert 

TBD technical basis document 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

5 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

In its Evaluation Report (ER) for the Kansas City Plant (KCP) Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) 

(NIOSH 2014), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) proposes to

use air concentration limits to bound internal exposures associated with Mg-Th operations at 

KCP from May 1, 1957, through April 30, 1979. Item 13 of the SEC Issues Matrix (SC&A 

2015) provides a status summary of discussions via the Advisory Board on Radiation and 

Worker Health’s (Advisory Board) KCP Work Group regarding the feasibility of bounding 

workers’ internal doses due to exposure to Mg-Th alloy operations in this manner. SC&A

evaluated the assumptions used in the KCP ER in its August 2014 white paper, Review of

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Its Progeny at the Kansas City Plant during Mg-Th

Machining Operations (SC&A 2014). In that paper, SC&A concluded that NIOSH’s approach 

to reconstructing internal doses associated with the machining of Mg-Th alloy at the KCP is 

based on assumptions that need to be clarified. 

In particular: 

1. SC&A asked for clarifications related to the thorium limit of 9E-11 μCi/ml in the period

of 1957–1959. In addition, SC&A questioned NIOSH about available data to enable a 

determination of whether this limit was enforced and actual air concentrations of Th-232 

remained generally below this limit. 

2. For the 1958–1970 period, SC&A questioned NIOSH on the use of depleted uranium 

(DU) air concentration data for Department 20-D/Department 22 to prove that thorium 

limits were enforced, without evidence that any of these air samples were related to MgTh processing. 

3. For the period after 1959, SC&A asked for clarification on whether the limit of 

3E-11 μCi/ml included Th-228 and possibly other decay products of Th-232. 

4. SC&A observed that NIOSH has not provided any air monitoring data for 1971–1979. 

5. SC&A questioned the use of a thorium machining air concentration test done in 1970, 

for the entire 1970–1979 period. SC&A pointed out that this test is inadequate to 

determine the value that should be used, even for the year of the test, much less for any 

other year. 

6. SC&A asked NIOSH to address the issue of doses from the progeny of thorium. 

7. SC&A questioned NIOSH on the various alloy compositions that were machined. 

As an action item from the June 10, 2014, meeting, NIOSH developed Response Paper, Internal 

Exposures to Thorium and its Progeny at the Kansas City Plant during Mg-Th Machining

(NIOSH 2015a), addressing each one of SC&A’s issues in its August 2014 paper, summarized 

above. SC&A reviewed NIOSH’s Response Paper and at the January 20, 2015, Work Group 

meeting, discussed it and noted that a number of assumptions remained to be clarified. At the 

same time, SC&A indicated that it was satisfied that items 6 and 7 (above) had been adequately 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

6 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

addressed by NIOSH and were recommended to the Work Group for closure consideration.1 At 

the Work Group meeting, SC&A was tasked to provide this formal response to the Work Group 

and NIOSH. 

Based on the Work Group discussions, further document review, and the March 2–5, 2015,

onsite visit to KCP, SC&A has concluded the following regarding the proposed dose 

reconstruction approach for Mg-Th internal exposures at KCP. 

1. SC&A agrees with NIOSH’s recently revised information that KCP’s Mg-Th machining 

was performed offsite by subcontractors from May 1, 1957, until August 1961, and not at 

the KCP site itself. According to NIOSH, Mg-Th machining operations at KCP actually 

began on August 23, 1961.

2. For the period, August 1961–March 1963, SC&A agrees with the NIOSH-proposed 

methodology to bound doses with the application of the thorium limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml. 

It is clear that there are gross alpha monitoring data for the location in question 

(Department 22), and Mg-Th and DU operations were co-located. 

3. For the period 1963–1966, information remains lacking regarding the Mg-Th machining 

workload that was ongoing in concert with co-located DU operations. NIOSH is using 

DU air sampling results to show that thorium workers were not exposed to concentrations 

above the bounding limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml. In this context, it is important to know if DU 

machining was done at the same time or in the same location of Mg-Th machining, using 

the same machines, in order to apply DU air sampling results, as gross alpha results, 

containing both uranium activities and/or thorium activities. 

4. For the period 1966–1970, information remains lacking regarding the location, specific 

timeframe, and workload for Mg-Th machining during this period. Department 20D 

(former Department 22),2 where the DU machining took place until 1966 [3/3/15 KCP 

worker interview – SRDB pending], started to be decontaminated in that year and was 

likely not used (in whole or part) for Mg-Th machining. This is problematic given that 

NIOSH makes use of DU area air samples and surface smears for Department20D to

show that the limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml was achieved in the Mg-Th machining operations, 

without knowing whether those operations had been relocated relative to these monitors. 

No further information has been found in recent data captures to resolve this issue. 

5. Beyond the 1970 breathing zone (BZ) test sampling conducted in D-851, there are no air 

sampling data applicable to Mg-Th machining in the Model Shop, where Mg-Th 

machining operations took place in 1970–1979. The Model Shop had heretofore not been 

a designated radiological area and NIOSH’s presumption regarding the rigor of 

radiological controls at that location during that time period is without objective basis. 

 

1

 The issue of doses from the progeny of thorium (item 6) was acknowledged as a TBD issue; the most 

claimant-favorable Th-228/Th-232 proportion (0.19-triple separation or 0.5-equilibrium) for each cancer organ 

should be used. In terms of alloy compositions, NIOSH has provided information on the various alloy compositions 

that were machined. 

2

 In October 1st, 1965, Department 22 changed its name to Department 20D (SRDB 123895, pages 154, 

156). Department 20D is sometimes referred to as Department 20-D, D/20D, Department 20 or D/20, depending on 

the document. 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

7 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

6. SC&A finds that the proposed limiting air concentration of 3E-11 μCi/ml for Mg-Th 

operations at KCP is conservative and likely claimant favorable, equating to a calculated 

20-year committed equivalent dose to the bone surface of 1.35 Sv (136 rem) and a 

50-year bone surface committed equivalent dose of 3 Sv (300 rem), for each year of work 

by a Mg-Th worker, for inhalation of Type M Th-232, Th-228 and Ra-224, at thorium228 to thorium-232 activity ratio of 0.19. The corresponding Type S committed 

equivalent doses to extrathoracic (ET) airways would be about 30 rem. 

In summary, SC&A concludes that critical information regarding Mg-Th machining location, 

workload, and timeframes are lacking for 1963–1970. This information is needed to apply 

available DU gross alpha monitoring data to corroborate that potential thorium air concentrations 

are bounded by the proposed air concentration limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml. SC&A further concludes 

that the lone set of 1970 BZ samples taken in D-851 are inadequate to demonstrate that the 3E11 μCi/ml limit was bounding for the Model Shop for 1970–1971. The limit, itself, is found to 

be conservative and likely claimant favorable, although operational information and air sampling 

data are lacking to corroborate that it is bounding for all relevant time periods from 1963–1979.

SC&A recommends that in the absence of such measurement data, NIOSH should validate its 

proposed 3E-11 μCi/ml air concentration limit through source term-based exposure modelling,

followed by suitable sample dose reconstructions to demonstrate the feasibility of applying this 

limit for the various operational time periods in question (i.e., 1963–1966, 1966–1970, 1970–

1979). 

2.0 SC&A’S FINDINGS 

The basic strategy adopted by NIOSH in the SEC Petition Evaluation Report for estimating the 

airborne dust loading of thorium and associated internal exposures during the Mg-Th operations 

is to use a combination of process knowledge and limits established and enforced on the 

maximum allowable airborne concentration of thorium. SC&A has reviewed NIOSH’s 

Response paper, the source documents cited in NIOSH’s Response Paper, and other NIOSHprovided documents available on the SRDB, in order to assess the degree to which the protocols 

adopted by NIOSH for reconstructing internal exposures to thorium are scientifically sound and 

claimant favorable. 

Finding 1. Start of Mg-Th machining operations at KCP: SC&A agrees with NIOSH’s 

recently revised information that KCP’s Mg-Th machining was performed offsite by 

subcontractors from May 1, 1957, until August 1961, and not at the KCP site itself. According 

to NIOSH, Mg-Th machining operations at KCP actually began on August 23, 1961. 

Finding 2. Bounding limit of 3E-11 uCi/ml: SC&A agrees with NIOSH’s response to item #3 

of its White Paper on the application of a bounding value of 3E-11 μCi/ml for thorium exposures 

in the machining work for the periods of time and locations where this limit was enforced. The 

application of this limit depends on NIOSH being able to corroborate for relevant operational 

time periods and locations that this limit was bounding of air concentrations to which Th-Mg 

machining workers were exposed. This has been done for 1961–1963, but is not clear for 1964–

1966, and is not corroborated for 1967–1979. Page 8 of the NIOSH responses to SC&A (NIOSH 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

8 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

2015a), first paragraph, cites documents that describe the location and health physics procedures 

for 1961–March 1963. As NIOSH describes on the same page 8, after March 1963, there is no 

other KCP documentation of Mg-Th machining at KCP. 

Finding 3. Uncertainty of Time, Workload, and Location of Mg-Th and of Uranium 

Machining Operations: SC&A finds that contradictory information is provided in the 

documented basis for defining the timeframe, operational workload, and location of radiological 

operations at KCP from 1961–1970.

On page 8 of the NIOSH Response, it is written: 

After March 1963, there is no other KCP documentation of Mg-Th machining at 

KCP or elsewhere until August 28, 1970, when these operation were performed in 

Department 20 and the Model Shop for the Radec program (SRDB 108264, PDF 

p. 26). This 1963–1970 time period with no Mg-Th machining is the same period 

that DU machining operations were ramping up in Department 20. (Emphasis 

added.) 

In NIOSH’s response to item 17 of the KCP SEC Issues Matrix for the January 20th Work 

Group meeting (NIOSH 2015a), it is written: 

In 1966, as DU machining work was winding down in D/20 (the only orders left 

were for rings and seal plugs), plans were made to transition to a new project 

machining polyurethane foam, and to clean D/20 and make it into an open area 

(123895, p. 132). The Facilities group cleaned, and the Industrial Hygiene group 

surveyed D/20D and D/217-20D.

Instructions were provided that stated, “...wet wipe all the walls and ceiling and 

other areas as the entire area walls and ceiling will be repainted, floors stripped 

and resealed, and equipment requiring decontamination decontaminated. Some 

of the equipment will go to Department 34C and can be packaged and 

transported to Department 34C. Some of the equipment will have to be 

disposed...” (123895, p. 133). Areas were surveyed for alpha contamination, 

and the nature of the contamination was described as follows: “Contamination is 

commingled with dust and is easily removed, either with soap and water or by 

vacuuming. Contamination levels are generally near the "open area" limit with 

the 'exception of bus ducts and ventilator-diffuser openings” (123895, pp. 141). 

In 1967, there was a request for improved housekeeping in D/34C (123895, pp. 

80, 87).”

On the other hand, Document SRDB 108264, page 8, defines Department 20D as a controlled 

radiation area.

Document SRDB 128373, cited as a reference to air sample results obtained in various 

departments, reports that during a certain period of 1966, no samples were taken in 34C, as no 

machining was done in this area during this sampling period. It is necessary to define where 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

9 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

Uranium and Mg-Th machining operations were done for each period of time and the respective 

workloads. 

Finding 4. Adequacy and completeness of air sampling data for corroborating that 

3E-11 μCi/ml limit was met for Mg-Th operations, 1961–1970: SC&A found that most of the 

references cited in NIOSH’s response paper providing air sampling data to corroborate that the 

thorium limit was met are either not valid or relevant for their intended purpose, due to lack of 

specified time period, wrong time period (not falling within 1961–1979), or wrong or unclear 

plant location (not Department 20D/22 in 1961–1969, or the Model Shop, Department 851/823, 

during 1970–1979).

 

On page 10 and 11 of NIOSH’s response paper, several documents containing air samples results 

for uranium are cited (SRDB 137071, SRDB 128390, SRDB 128206, SRDB 128240, SRDB 

128373, SRDB 128377, SRDB 14700, SRDB 128344, and SRDB 128295). Those documents 

are provided to support NIOSH’s conclusion that air sampling was in reality gross alpha and can 

be used to bound thorium exposures: 

 

Mg-Th machining operations began in Department 20 (AKA Department 22, 

Heavy Machining Area) August 23, 1961 and were only performed in this 

department until September 21, 1970, when they were moved to the Model Shop 

(described previously in this report). This means the bulk of the available airmonitoring data was obtained in the department where Mg-Th machining 

occurred, and at the same time (SRDB 137071, PDF p.4). Although these fixedfilter air-monitoring stations were established primarily for KCP’s principal 

machining activities (DU), they would have been analyzed for gross alpha and 

can be used to bound thorium exposures. (NIOSH 2015a) 

A review was performed by SC&A of the cited documents in NIOSH’s response paper that 

serve to corroborate that the 3E-11 μCi/ml thorium limit was met. SC&A’s review of each 

referenced set of monitoring data is summarized below (emphasis added). 

a. Document SRDB 137071, page 4, is a trip report with an illegible date. It specifies the 

radiological safety of Departments 22, 34 and 81L. The document relates a previous 

survey made in September 1959. Accompanying this report is a trip report dated 

February 3, 1961, which falls before the starting date of the Mg-Th operations (August 

23, 1961), rendering it irrelevant. It is necessary to find out if the first cited trip report 

document was written after the start of Mg-Th operations in order for it to be a valid 

reference. 

b. Document SRDB 128390 provides air sampling results for December 1969 to December 

1970, as taken in Departments 20D, 27C, 862L, and 34C. However, after September 

1970, Mg-Th machining operations took place in the Model Shop (Department 851, later 

renamed Department 823). It needs to be clearly shown that Mg-Th machining 

operations took place in Departments 20D, 27C, 826L or 34C from December 1969 to 

September 1970 for these air sample results to be relevant. 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

10 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

c. Document SRDB 128206 contains air sample results from 1971, taken in Departments 

34C, 862L, 20D, and 34C. This document is not relevant for Mg-Th machining 

operations, as it does not cover samples taken in the Model Shop (Department 851, later 

renamed Department 823).

d. Document SRDB 128240 is a 1990 document. It is not relevant for the period being 

analyzed.

e. Document SRDB 128373 contains air samples results taken in 1962, 1963, and 1964 in 

Departments 22, 34C and 216-22, and air sample results taken in 1965,1966, 1967, 1968,

and 1969 in Departments 20-D, 34-C, 217-22, 217-20 (last one with the remark nonradioactive area). 

In NIOSH’s response to item 17 of the KCP SEC Issues Matrix for the January 20 WG 

meeting (NIOSH 2015b), it is written: 

In 1966, as DU machining work was winding down in D/20 (the only 

orders left were for rings and seal plugs), plans were made to transition to 

a new project machining polyurethane foam, and to clean D/20 and make 

it into an open area (SRDB 123895, p. 132). The Facilities group 

cleaned, and the Industrial Hygiene group surveyed D/20D and D/217-

20D. 

 

In addition, on page 8 of the NIOSH response paper (NIOSH 2015a), it is stated that: 

...after March 1963, there is no other KCP documentation of Mg-Th 

machining at KCP or elsewhere until August 28, 1970, when these 

operations were performed in Department 20 and the Model Shop for the 

Radec program.

In SRDB 128373, it is reported that no samples were taken in 34C during the periods 

from August 23, 1966–September 8, 1966; September 9–18, 1966; October 3–17, 1967; 

October 18–November 1, 1966; and November 28–December 12, 1967, as no machining 

was done in this area during these sampling periods. The reported cleaning of 

Department 20 D by 1966 requires knowledge of location, time period, and workload of 

DU and Mg-Th machining operations during the 1963–1969 period. In summary, SRDB 

128373 is a relevant document for 1962 and 1963; however, for 1963–1969, it is 

necessary to determine the workload of Mg-Th machining and the location where those 

operations took place. 

f. Document SRDB 128377, page 45, is described in NIOSH’s report, but was found to be 

dated September 23, 1958, well before Mg-Th operations took place. The information on 

this document is complemented by document Schiltz not dated, page 4, which provides a 

description of the equipment that was used. Those documents cannot be used for the 

purpose of showing that thorium exposures from machining operations from 1961–1979 

were controlled below the limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml.
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

11 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

g. Document SRDB 128377, page 92, describes the measurement of suspected uranium 

oxide contamination using an Alpha-Air Proportional Counter Model PAC-lA. It is dated 

August 2, 1958, before Mg-Th operations took place. In addition, the measurement 

described on page 92 relates to uranium oxide contamination in the Materials Laboratory. 

SRDB 137071, page 4, cited before, explains that uranium oxide, in a very finely divided 

form, was received in sealed gallon cans, which were opened in an exhaust ventilated 

hood or in a blending room designed for the purpose. Thus, the suspected oxide 

contamination was probably not related to uranium machining operations.

h. The information in this document (SRDB 128377) is complemented by document SRDB 

128344, page 131, which describes the alpha-gamma scintillation counter portable model 

PAC-1S AGA offered by Eberline in 1960 (Eberline - National Radiation Instrument 

Catalog, national-radiation-instrument-catalog.com/new_page) and by document SRDB 

128295, page 4, dated May 1, 1977, which describes the use of survey meter PAC1SAGA to check leaks of several calibration sources. Those documents cannot be used 

with the purpose of showing that thorium exposures from machining operations from 

1961–1979 were controlled below the limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml.

Finding 5. Adequacy of a Single Thorium Machining Air Concentration Test, Done in 

September–October 1970 to be used as Bounding for the Entire 1970–1979 Period. SC&A 

and NIOSH are in apparent agreement “that the sensitivity of this test was not high...” NIOSH 

further states that it “believes that the assessment KCP performed from September 18 to October 

10, 1970 (prior to the second Mg-Th campaign), is useful as additional data to support the ER’s 

bounding method, as well as KCP’s good work practices.” (NIOSH 2015a).

SC&A disagrees that there should be reliance on practices performed in the 1971–1979 period 

based on a single test conducted before the bulk of Mg-Th machining operations took place, even 

if used as a complement to air monitoring data taken in Department 20-D. Mg-Th machining 

operations took place in the Model Shop (Department 851), considered an uncontrolled area 

(SRDB 108264, page 8). Air monitoring data from two different departments in different 

exposures periods are not necessarily equivalents. 

Finding 6. Adequacy and completeness of routine contamination surveys for corroborating 

that 3E-11 μCi/ml limit was met for Mg-Th operations, 1970–1979: SC&A does not agree 

with NIOSH in its use of KCP surface contamination data coupled with its programmatic 

premise that there was no indication of degradation of “in-plant environmental working 

conditions” as sufficiently rigorous or objective, given the total absence of any bioassay or air 

monitoring data. 

On page 12 of NIOSH’s response paper, three documents containing KCP routine surface 

contamination monitoring results for uranium are cited (SRDB 123883, SRDB 123889, and 

SRDB 123896). Those documents are intended to complement the 1970 BZ air sampling 

performed prior to relocation of Mg-Th operations from Department 20-D/22 to the Model 

Shop, albeit, the surface surveys taken do not cover the 1971–1979 period. 

On page 12 of NIOSH’s response paper, it is stated: 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

12 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

NIOSH has not found additional routine air-monitoring data for the time period 

after KCP performed the Negative Exposure Assessment (NEA) for their Model 

Shop Mg-Th machining operations from September 18 to October 10, 1970.

(SRDB 108264, PDF p.16). In the absence of additional air-monitoring data, 

NIOSH has also considered data from KCP’s routine surface contamination 

monitoring program as an indication of workplace conditions (SRDB 123883; 

123889; 123896). NIOSH modeled the surface contamination that would have 

been created from the natural settling of air concentrations at KCP’s prescribed 

limit and compared the result to the actual surface contamination data. NIOSH 

used the 3E-11 μCi/ml (66.6 dpm/m3) airborne concentration limit and assumed a 

7.5E-4 m/s settling rate (Battelle-TBD-6000) for 30 days, and derived a 

1,295 dpm/100 cm2surface contamination level. By comparison, routine survey 

records show the average measured level recorded for the Department 20 general 

area from 1962 to 1969 to be 892 dpm/100 cm2

(ORAUT-TKBS-0031, Table 10). 

There are no indications that KCP’s control of work or in-plant environmental 

working conditions degraded in the years after the cessation of air monitoring, 

which leaves NIOSH confident that exposures remain bounded with the use of the 

3E-11 μCi/ml limit specified in the ER.

a. Document SRDB 123883 reports floor monitoring results in various departments in 

1960, before Mg-Th machining operations took place. It cannot be used in the relevant 

time period. 

b. Document SRDB 123889 reports floor monitoring results taken in various departments 

in 1959 and 1960, before Mg-Th machining operations took place. It cannot be used in 

the relevant time period.

c. Document SRDB 123896 reports floor monitoring results in various departments, 

including 20D or 22 in 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1967, 1968, and 1969. The results 

confirm NIOSH’s statement that the average measured level recorded for the Department 

20/22 general area from 1962 to 1969 was less than 1,295 dpm/100 cm

2

surface 

contamination level. It is relevant for the period 1962–1969. There are no monitoring 

data for the period 1971–1979, neither air or surface monitoring, when the machining of 

Mg-Th took place in the Model Shop.

SC&A does not share NIOSH’s confidence that “there are no indications that KCP’s control of 

work or in-plant environmental working conditions degraded in the years after the cessation of 

air monitoring.” The Model Shop (Department 851) was considered an uncontrolled area, with 

application of corresponding Health and Safety Guide criteria and procedures for an 

uncontrolled area, while Department 20-D was a controlled radiation area. This was, in fact, 

emphasized in a memorandum from Robert T. Foster to V.J. Smeltzer (Foster 1971) titled, 

“Development Support Project Using Magnesium-Thorium Alloy” (SRDB 108264, page 8). 

The first three sentences of the memorandum are reproduced below: 

As you requested in your referenced correspondence, we have reviewed the health 

and Safety Guide dated August 28, 1970, and believe it should not be relaxed... 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

13 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

Based on our past experience, it is recommended that this work be completed in 

Department 20-D, radiation area, instead of the Engineering Shop, Department 

851... Considerable difficulty would be experienced in explaining an incident 

involving radioactive materials while machining and fabrication of parts on a 

continued temporary basis in an uncontrolled area (D/851) when a controlled 

area (D/20-D) has been provided for such work...

Finding 7. SC&A finds that the proposed limiting air concentration of 3E-11 μCi/ml for 

Mg-Th operations at KCP is conservative and claimant favorable, albeit, operational 

information is lacking to corroborate actual airborne concentrations of thorium during 

most time periods. The application of the limit translates into high 20–50 years committed 

equivalent doses to the bone surface, lungs and extrathoracic airways. 

NIOSH has proposed to apply the engineered limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml as a constant for the period 

1961–1979. NIOSH assumes that machine operators in the Main Manufacturing Building 

breathed air at this concentration for 2,000 hours per year. 

SC&A calculated the 20-yr, 30-yr and 50-yr committed equivalent doses to various tissues and 

organs, which dominate committed doses,3as a preliminary means to validate the concentration 

limit, as applied. For thorium, the main systemic tissues and organs in terms of deposition and 

long-term retention are bone surface, liver, and red bone marrow. The lung is an important 

organ in terms of deposition and retention of inhaled material. 

NIOSH has suggested using a 0.19 ratio for Th-228/Th232 as “a claimant-favorable assumption 

because the dose conversion factors are higher for thorium-232.”

SC&A noted that when the cancer organ is the lung, it is claimant favorable to assume 

equilibrium between Th-228 and Th-232. SC&A proposed at the January 20, 2015, WG 

meeting, with NIOSH’s agreement, that the most claimant-favorable Th-228/Th-232 ratio (0.19 

assuming triple separation of thorium, or 0.5 assuming equilibrium), should be chosen for each 

cancer organ (NIOSH 2015b). 

Considering that the standard worker breathes 1.2 m3/h or 1.2E6 mL/h, and is exposed to 

2,000 h/y, the annual intake corresponding to the limiting concentration of 3E-11 μCi/mL 

(1.11E-6 Bq/mL) is 2.664E3 Bq/y, which comprises the alpha activities of Th-232, Th-228, and 

Ra-224. For an activity ratio of 0.19 Th-228/Th-232 and Ra-224/Th-232, the intake rates 

corresponding to the air activity of 3E-11 μCi/mL (1.11E-6 Bq/mL) are 1,930 Bq/y of Th-232, 

367 Bq/y of Th-228, and 367 Bq/y of Ra-224. Committed equivalent doses were obtained by 

multiplying the intake rates of 1,930 Bq/y of Th-232, 367 Bq/y of Th-228, and 367 Bq/y of 

Ra-224 by the committed equivalent dose coefficients in Sv/Bq taken from the ICRP Database 

of Dose Coefficients, version 3.0, 2011 (ICRP 2011).

Table 1 shows the 20-yr, 30-yr and 50-yr committed equivalent doses to bone surface, liver, and 

red bone marrow for each year of exposure to Mg-Th machining at the limiting concentration of 

3E-11 μCi/mL (1.11E-6 Bq/mL), considering Type M thorium exposures.

 

3

 Doses to different organs correspond to 1-year exposures to the limiting concentration of 3E-11 μCi/mL. 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

14 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

Table 1. Committed Equivalent Doses to Various Organs and Tissues, due to 1-year Intake 

of 1,930 Bq of Th-232, 367 Bq of Th-228, and 367 Bq of Ra-224, 

considering Type M Thorium 

Committed Doses (Sv) to Type M Th-232 Type M Th-228 Type M Ra-224 Total

Bone Surface

 20 yr 1.25E+00 1.03E-01 3.49E-04 1.36E+00

 30 yr 1.81E+00 1.03E-01 3.49E-04 1.92E+00

 50 yr 2.9E+00 1.03E-01 3.49E-04 3.0E+00

Liver 

 20 yr 2.12E-02 4.4E-03 1.1E-05 2.56E-02

 30 yr 2.90E-02 4.4E-03 1.1E-05 3.34E-02

 50 yr 4.44E-02 4.4E-03 1.1E-05 4.88E-02

Red Bone Marrow

 20 yr 6.37E-02 8.07E-03 3.34E-05 7.18E-02

 30 yr 8.11E-02 8.07E-03 3.34E-05 8.92E-02

 50 yr 1.1E-01 8.07E-03 3.34E-05 1.18E-01

Table 2 shows the 20-yr, 30-yr and 50-yr committed equivalent doses to lungs and ET Airways 

for each year of exposure to Mg-Th machining at the limiting concentration of 3E-11 μCi/mL 

(1.11E-6 Bq/mL), considering Type S thorium exposures: 

Table 2. Committed Equivalent Doses to Lungs and ET Airways due to 1-year Work, 

considering Type S Thorium, and Intakes of 1,930 Bq of Th-232, 367 Bq of Th-228, 

and 367 Bq of Ra-224

Committed Equivalent Doses (Sv) to Type S Th-232 Type S Th-228 Type M Ra-224 Total

Lungs 

 20 yr 1.20E-01 7.71E-02 7.34E-03 2.04E-01

 30 yr 1.35E-01 7.71E-02 7.34E-03 2.2E-01

 50 yr 1.49E-01 7.71E-02 7.34E-03 2.33E-01

ET Airways

 20 yr 1.93E-01 7.71E-02 2.2E-03 2.72E-01

 30 yr 2.12E-01 7.71E-02 2.2E-03 2.92E-01

 50 yr 2.12E-01 7.71E-02 2.2E-03 2.92E-01

Table 3 shows the 20-yr, 30-yr and 50-yr committed equivalent doses to lungs and ET Airways 

for each year of exposure to Mg-Th machining at the limiting concentration of 3E-11 μCi/mL 

(1.11E-6 Bq/mL), considering that thorium is in equilibrium with the daughters. This 

corresponds to intakes of 888 Bq/y for Th-232, Th-228, and Ra-224. Committed equivalent 

doses were obtained by multiplying the intake rates of 888 Bq/y of Th-232, Th-228, and Ra-224 

by the committed equivalent dose coefficients in Sv/Bq taken from the ICRP Database of Dose 

Coefficients, version 3.0, 2011 (ICRP 2011). 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

15 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

Table 3. Committed Equivalent Doses to the Lungs and ET Airways for Thorium in 

Equilibrium with Daughters, for Each Year of Work , for Types M and S Thorium 

Committed Doses (Sv) to Type M Th-232 Type M Th-228 Type M Ra-224 Total

Lungs 

 20 yr 1.15E-02 1.15E-01 1.78E-02 1.45E-01

 30 yr 1.24E-02 1.15E-01 1.78E-02 1.46E-01

 50 yr 1.42E-02 1.15E-01 1.78E-02 1.47E-01

ET Airways

 20 yr 1.07E-02 5.15E-02 5.33E-03 6.75E-02

 30 yr 1.15E-02 5.15E-02 5.33E-03 6.84E-02

 50 yr 1.33E-02 5.15E-02 5.33E-03 7.02E-02

Committed Doses (Sv) to Type S Th-232 Type S Th-228 Type M Ra-224 Total

Lungs 

 20 yr 5.51E-02 1.86E-01 1.78E-02 2.59E-01

 30 yr 6.22E-02 1.86E-01 1.78E-02 2.66E-01

 50 yr 6.84E-02 1.86E-01 1.78E-02 2.73E-01

ET Airways

 20 yr 8.88E-02 1.86E-01 5.33E-03 2.81E-01

 30 yr 9.77E-02 1.86E-01 5.33E-03 2.89E-01

 50 yr 9.77E-02 1.86E-01 5.33E-03 2.89E-01

The committed equivalent doses to bone surfaces from inhalation exposures to Type M Th-232, 

Th-228, and Ra-224 at the limiting concentration, distributed in an equilibrium ratio of 0.19 for 

Th-228/Th-232 and Ra-224/Th-232, are high. For each year of work, the worker will receive a 

20-year committed equivalent dose to the bone surface of 1.36 Sv (136 rem) and a 50-year

committed equivalent dose of 3 Sv (300 rem). The corresponding Type S committed equivalent 

doses to the ET Airways are about 30 rem, while the 20-year–30-year committed equivalent 

doses to the lungs vary from 20–23 rem. For Type S thorium exposures, the lungs show greater 

committed equivalent doses when Th-232 is in equilibrium with Th-228 and Ra-224. In this 

case, the 20-yr–50-yr committed equivalent doses to the lungs are about 27 rem, and the 20-yr–

30-yr committed equivalent doses to the ET airways are about 29 rem. 

In conclusion, although there is a lack of information on airborne thorium concentrations during 

confirmed and suspected Mg-Th operations at KCP, the application of the limiting 

concentrations to the workers translates into high assigned doses to certain organs and tissues, 

especially bone surface. The calculated committed equivalent doses correspond only to doses 

from exposure to Th-232, Th-228, and Ra-224 through inhalation of 5 AMAD particles. Dose 

from ingestion and thoron exposures, for example, were not considered. 

 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

16 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution.

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

Remaining Questions:

Based on the foregoing results of the SC&A review, the following specific questions remain for 

resolution by the WG:

1. Were Mg-Th machining and DU machining done at the same time and in the same area? 

As already cited in Finding 4, NIOSH states : 

Mg-Th machining operations began in Department 20 (AKA Department 22, 

Heavy Machining Area) August 23, 1961 and were only performed in this 

department until September 21, 1970, when they were moved to the Model 

Shop (described previously in this report). This means the bulk of the 

available air-monitoring data was obtained in the department where Mg-Th 

machining occurred, and at the same time (SRDB 137071, PDF p.4). 

Although these fixed-filter air-monitoring stations were established primarily 

for KCP’s principal machining activities (DU), they would have been 

analyzed for gross alpha and can be used to bound thorium exposures.

The document SRDB 137071 that NIOSH cites as proof that Mg-Th machining was

conducted at the same time and in the same department as DU machining does not cite 

Mg-Th machining and does not have a legible date; thus, it is not possible to know if the 

trip report cited took place before August 1961, when Mg-Th machining operations 

started. In addition, the document states that all work with radioactive material was

performed in Departments 22, 34 and 81L, but it does not specify which type of work 

was done in each of the departments.

None of the documents cited by NIOSH provides any proof that Mg-Th machining 

operations took place at the same time and in the same location as DU machining 

work.

NIOSH is using DU air-sampling results to show that thorium workers were not exposed 

to concentrations above the bounding limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml. In this context, it is

important to know if DU machining was done at the same time and in the same location 

of Mg-Th machining, in order to use DU air-sampling results, as gross alpha results, 

containing both thorium activities and uranium activities.

2. Were air samplers positioned near Mg-Th machining, or were they placed near DU 

machining? It is important to know if air samplers were placed near Mg-Th machining 

work.

3. Were the machines assigned to non-radioactive machining in the same area as the ones 

used for machining radioactive materials? Did the workers use machines designated for

radioactive materials when doing Mg-Th machining? Were the exhaust and ventilation 

systems the same in the area of non-radioactive machining and radioactive machining? 

What about the Health Protection standards? Did Mg-Th machining always take place in 

the same area of Department 20-D?
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

17 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution.

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

In Department 22, workers did machining of non–radioactive material as well as 

machining of radioactive materials, in 1964 and 1965. Document SRDB 123895 cites 

some concerns on the use of machines assigned for radioactive material being used for 

machining non-radioactive material (pages 20, 24, 155 and 166).

4. Did machining of non-radioactive materials take place at the same time as radioactive 

material? Did the dust from machining non-radioactive materials interfere with the 

quality of the air inhaled by the workers doing Mg-Th or DU machining?

5. What was the workload of Mg-Th machining in relation to the workload of DU 

machining in Department 20-D (formelly Department 22)? Did Mg-Th machining take 

place every year during the period 1961–1970? Was it done sporadically, or was it a 

continuous work? What about DU machining?

If Mg-Th machining was not done at the same time as DU machining, than the DU airsampling results that are reported are related only to DU machining work. It is important 

to know the DU workload in relation to the workload of Mg-Th machining during the 

period 1963–1970. If the DU workload was higher than the Mg-Th workload, then DU 

air samples can be used to show that potential exposures to thorium were below the 

bounding limits. The same applies to Mg-Th work being done at the same time, but in a 

different area of the same department, if air samplers were positioned with the objective 

of monitoring DU machining work.

6. Where did Mg-Th machining take place during the period 1966–1970? It is important to 

know the length of time that Department 20-D remained a clean area. NIOSH is using 

DU air samples in Department 20-D to show that exposures to thorium were below the 

bounding limit. Samples taken in a clean area are not representative of exposures to 

workers.

7. Which exhaust and ventilation systems existed in the Model Shop during the period 

1971–1979? Which Health Protection programs existed for the workers in the Model 

Shop? It is important to collect whatever information exists regarding health protection 

of Mg-Th machining workers during the period 1971–1979.

3.0 NON-SEC ISSUES

1. Doses from the Progeny of Thorium

In NIOSH’s response to item #5 of its paper, the use of 0.19 ratio of Th-228 to Th-232 is 

proposed. NIOSH sustains that:

It is likely that the thorium would have been triple-separated over the course of 

several years prior to use at KCP... Triple-separated thorium, subject to 

pessimistically chosen intervals between chemical purification, results in a 

thorium-228 to thorium-232 activity ratio of 0.19. By minimizing the ratio of 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

18 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution.

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

thorium-228 to thorium-232 the assumed isotopic mixture is weighted in favor of 

thorium-232.

NIOSH states that the 0.19 ratio is “a claimant-favorable assumption because the dose 

conversion factors are higher for thorium-232.” SC&A notes that the 0.19 ratio is not 

claimant favorable for all organs and tissues. For the lungs, for example, the DCF for 

Type M Th-228 is 1.3E-4 Sv/Bq, and for Type M Th-232 is 1.6 E-5. The dose to the lung 

per unit intake is a factor of 10 lower for Th-232, as compared to the dose from Th-228. For 

Type S Th-228, the DCF is 2.1E-4 and the DCF for Type S Th-232 is 7.7E-5 [ICRP Database 

of Dose Coefficients (ICRP 2011)]. When the cancer organ is the lung, it is claimant 

favorable to assume equilibrium between Th-228 and Th-232.

SC&A proposed at the January 20th WG meeting, with NIOSH’s agreement, that the most 

claimant-favorable Th-228/Th-232 ratio (0.19 assuming triple separation of thorium, or 

0.5 assuming equilibrium) should be chosen for each cancer organ. This item has been 

acknowledged as a TBD issue.

2. Nominal Thorium Concentration of the Mg-Th Alloys Machined at KCP.

In its response paper, NIOSH has given adequate information on the composition of Mg-Th 

alloys.

4.0 CONCLUSIONS

1. SC&A agrees with NIOSH’s recently revised information that KCP’s Mg-Th machining was 

performed offsite by subcontractors from May 1, 1957, until August 1961, and not at the 

KCP site. According to NIOSH, Mg-Th machining operations at KCP actually began on 

August 23, 1961.

2. For the period August 1961–March 1963, SC&A agrees with the NIOSH-proposed 

methodology to bound doses with the application of the thorium limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml. It is 

clear that there are gross alpha monitoring data for the location (Department 22) in question, 

and Mg-Th and DU operations were co-located.

3. For the period 1963–1966, information remains lacking regarding the Mg-Th machining 

work load (i.e., was Mg-Th even being machined?) that was ongoing in concert with colocated DU operations. 

4. For the period 1966–1970, information remains lacking regarding the location, specific 

timeframe, and workload for Mg-Th machining. Department D-20 (former D-22), where the 

DU machining took place until 1966 [3/3/15 KCP worker interview – SRDB pending],

started to be decontaminated in that year and was likely not used (in whole or part) for 

Mg-Th machining. This is problematic, given that NIOSH makes use of DU area air

samples and surface smears for D-20/22 to show that the limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml was 

achieved in the Mg-Th machining operations, without knowing whether those operations 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

19 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution.

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

had been relocated relative to these monitors. No further information has been found in

recent data captures to resolve this issue. 

5. NIOSH needs to provide air monitoring results for the Model Shop, for the period November 

1970–1979, before applying the proposed bounding value of 3E-11 μCi/ml for exposures to 

thorium in the Mg-Th machining operations. SC&A does not agree that air and surface 

monitoring results from Department 20-D (former Department 22) during the 1962–August 

1970 period can be used as an indication that in the period October 1970–1971, “KCP’s 

control of work or in-plant environmental working conditions did not degrade in the years 

after the cessation of air monitoring,” as stated by NIOSH. The Mg-Th machining work 

after September 1970 took place in the Model Shop, an uncontrolled area, with different 

Health and Safety Guides. In relation to the single thorium machining air concentration test, 

done in September–October 1970, SC&A disagrees that there should be reliance on practices 

performed in the 1971–1979 period based on a single test conducted before the bulk of MgTh machining operations took place, even if used as a complement to air monitoring data 

taken in Department 20-D.

6. In calculating thorium doses, the most claimant-favorable Th-228/Th-232 ratio (0.19

assuming triple separation of thorium, or 0.5 assuming equilibrium) should be chosen for 

each cancer organ. This item has been acknowledged as a TBD issue.

7. In its response paper, NIOSH has provided adequate information on the composition of MgTh alloys.

In summary, SC&A concludes that critical information regarding Mg-Th machining location, 

workload, and timeframes are lacking for 1963–1970. This information is needed to apply 

available DU gross alpha monitoring data to corroborate that potential thorium air concentrations 

are bounded by the proposed air concentration limit of 3E-11 μCi/ml. SC&A further concludes 

that the lone set of 1970 BZ samples taken in Department 851 are inadequate to demonstrate that 

the 3E-11 μCi/ml limit was bounding for the Model Shop for 1970–1971. The limit, itself, is 

found to be very conservative, equating to a calculated 20-year dose equivalent to the bone 

surface of 1.35 Sv (136 rem) and a 50-year bone surface dose equivalent of 3 Sv (300 rem) for 

each year of work by a Mg-Th worker. Maximum dose equivalent to the lungs and ET airways 

are about 30 rem. Whether they would be bounding exposure values cannot be verified in the 

absence of measurement data or suitable source term exposure modelling.

 

SC&A recommends that in the absence of such measurement data, NIOSH should validate its 

proposed 3E-11 μCi/ml air concentration limit through source term-based exposure modelling,

followed by suitable sample dose reconstructions to demonstrate the feasibility of applying this 

limit for the various operational time periods in question (i.e., 1963–1966, 1966–1970, 1970–

1979).
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

20 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution.

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

REFERENCES

Battelle-TBD-6000, Site Profile for Atomic Worker Employers that Worked Uranium and 

Thorium Metals, 2006.

Foster 1971. Memorandum from Robert T. Foster to V.J. Smeltzer, titled “Development Support 

Project Using Magnesium-Thorium Alloy.” January 5, 1971. SRDB 108264.

ICRP 2011. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Database of Dose 

Coefficients: Workers and Members of the Public, CD-ROM, version 3.0, 2011.

NIOSH 2014. Evaluation Report for the Kansas City Plant (KCP) Special Exposure Cohort 

(SEC), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.

NIOSH 2015a. Response Paper, Internal Exposures to Thorium and its Progeny at the Kansas 

City Plant during Mg-Th Machining, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 

Cincinnati, Ohio. January 2015.

NIOSH 2015b. KCP SEC Issues Matrix for January 20 WG meeting, National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.

ORAUT-TKBS-0031. 2006. Site Profile for the Kansas City Plant, Jack J. Fix and Richard J. 

Traub, Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team. Cincinnati, Ohio. 2006.

 

SC&A 2014. Review of Internal Exposures to Thorium and Its Progeny at the Kansas City Plant 

during Mg-Th Machining Operations, SC&A, Inc., Vienna, Virginia, and Saliant, Inc., Jefferson, 

Maryland. August 15, 2014.

SC&A 2015. Kansas City Plant Special Exposure Cohort (Sec 210) Issues Matrix, Prepared by SC&A, 

Inc., Vienna, Virginia. February 2, 2015.

SRDB 14700: Radiation Detection Equipment.

SRDB 108264, PDF p. 8: January 5, 1971, memorandum from Robert T. Foster to V.J. 

Smeltzer, titled “Development Support Project Using Magnesium-Thorium Alloy.”

SRDB 108264, PDF p. 16: Summary of Air Samples of Magnesium-Thorium Project in D/851

SRDB 108264, PDF p. 26: Development Support Project Using Magnesium-Thorium Alloy

(August 28, 1970)

SRDB 123883: Floor Monitoring Reports, January 11, 1960 – November 2, 1960

SRDB123889: Floor Monitoring Reports, May – December 1959 
Effective Date:

May 6, 2015

Revision No.:

0 (Draft)

Document No.: Review of NIOSH’s White Paper:

Internal Exposures to Thorium and Progeny at KCP

Page No.:

21 of 21

NOTICE: This memo has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution.

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82.

SRDB 123895, PDF p. 80: Maintenance of Radiation Areas (Departments 20D, 443-20D, and 

34-C), June 19, 1967

SRDB 123895, PDF p. 87: Interior Surfaces, D-34C, January 18, 1963

SRDB 123895, PDF p. 132: Modifications, Department 20D and 217- 20D, February 8, 1966 

SRDB 123895, PDF p. 133: Department 20D and Department 217-20D, February 7, 1966 

SRDB 123895, PDF p. 141: Surface Contamination in Department 20D, February 7, 1966

SRDB 123896: Floor Monitoring Reports, July 21, 1965 – August 5, 1969

SRDB 128206: U-238 Air Sample Results for Departments 862-L, 34C, and 20D for 1971

SRDB 128240: Radiation Protect Program Manual – Kansas City Division, 1990

SRDB128295, PDF p. 4: Radioactive Source Survey (May 1, 1977)

SRDB 128344 PDF p. 131: Eberline Alpha-Gamma Scintillation Counter, Portable Model

PAC-1SAGA Information

SRDB 128373: Air Sample Results by Location, 1962–1969

SRDB128377 PDF p. 45: Radiation Contamination Determination, September 1958

SRDB128377 PDF p. 92: Radiation Contamination Determination, August 2, 1958

SRDB 128390: Air Sample Results by Location for December 1969 – December 1970 

SRDB 137071 PDF p. 4: Trip Report, illegible date.

SRDB pending: 3/3/15 KCP worker interview