alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3490-3491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-1025]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Public Announcement Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

Agency Holding Meeting: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

Date and Time: 12 p.m., Thursday, January 21, 2010.

Place: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, 
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

Status: Closed.

Matters Considered: The following matter will be considered during the 
closed meeting:
    Consideration of two original jurisdiction cases pursuant to 28 CFR 
2.27.

Agency Contact: Patricia W. Moore, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, 
United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5933.


[[Page 3491]]


    Dated: January 12, 2010.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-1025 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  I, John S. Chidester, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of  TOWN AND COUNTRY APPRAISAL SERVICE, INC.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: August 18, 2009  /s/ John S. Chidester John S. Chidester Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

1090 Tusculum Avenue

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938

Phone: 513-533-6825

Fax: 513-533-6826

June 23, 2015 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00226 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Hanford site in Richland, WA, as an addition to the Special Exposure 

Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 

2000. On May 20, 2015, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS 

designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All employees of Department of Energy contractors and subcontractors (excluding 

employees of the following Hanford prime contractors during the specified time periods: 

Battelle Memorial Institute, January 1, 1984, through December 31, 1990; Rockwell Hanford 

Operations, January 1, 1984, through June 28, 1987; Boeing Computer Services Richland, 

January 1, 1984, through June 28, 1987; UNC Nuclear Industries, January 1, 1984, through 

June 28, 1987; Westinghouse Hanford Company, January 1, 1984, through December 31, 

1990; and Hanford Environmental Health Foundation, January 1, 1984, through December 

31, 1990), who worked at the Hanford site in Richland, Washington, during the period from 

January I, 1984, through December 31, 1990, for a number of work days aggregating at least 

250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work 

days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in 

the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on June 21, 2015, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §7384l(14)(C).

Therefore, beginning on June 21, 2015, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in 

this notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely,

 [Signature on File] 

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Order entered February 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00082-CV

IN RE HUB GROUP TRUCKING, INC.; WAEL AL-ASHQAR; MAPLETREE 

TRANSPORTATION, INC.; AND DENNIS EADS, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08540

ORDER

Before Justices Schenck, Partida-Kipness, and Nowell

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS

JUSTICE
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. LUIS ENRIQUE M EJIA-C A LDER ON, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10292

D.C . No. 2:12-c r-00039-TLN M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Troy L. Nunle y , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2015 ** B e fore : LEAVY, C ALLAHAN, a nd M . SM ITH, C i rc uit Judge s. Luis EnriqueM e

jia -C a lde ron a

ppe a ls from

the distric t

c ourt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s his guilty-ple a c onvic tion a

nd 108-m onth a ggre g ate se nte nc e for thre e c ounts of ille ga l use of a

c om m unic ation fa c ility , in viola tion of 21 U.S.C . § 843(b). Pursua

nt to Ande r

s v . C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), M e jia -C a lde ron’ s 

# F IL ED MAY18 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d M e jia -C a lde ron the opportunity

to filea pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. M e jia -C a lde ron wa i ve d his right to a ppe a l his c onvic tion a

nd se nte nc e . Our inde pe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to P e n son v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to the va lidity of the wa ive r. Se eUnite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dismiss the a ppe a l. Se eid. at 988. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D.

1 4 - 1 0 2 9 2 2
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:80949876-37ce-424a-a143-904390e18db8,g:ccc493dd-c1aa-4b9f-b784-628485a5dd2b-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:hrs="http://harris.com/20220804" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://harris.com/20220804">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021q4" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2021q4/dei-2021q4.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="hrs-20220804_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="hrs-20220804_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="CoverPage" roleURI="http://harris.com/role/CoverPage">
        <link:definition>0001001 - Document - Cover Page</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
---

---

Exhibit 8.1

# LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

| |                                       |                         
| | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------
|
|
|
|
| | Name of Subsidiary                    | Country of Incorporation
| |                                       |                         
| | BluePhoenix Solutions USA Inc.        | United States           
| | Amalgamated Software NA Inc. (ASNA)   | United States           
| | BridgeQuest Inc.                      | United States           
| | BluePhoenix Solutions Nordic ApS      | Denmark                 
| | BluePhoenix Solutions U.K. Ltd.       | United Kingdom          
| | BluePhoenix Solutions Srl.            | Italy                   
| | I-Ter/Informatica & Territorio S.p.A. | Italy                   
| | BluePhoenix Solutions GmbH            | Germany                 
| | BluePhoenix Solutions B.V.            | The Netherlands         
| | BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd.            | Cyprus                  
| | BluePhoenix Solutions Srl.            | Romania                 
| | BluePhoenix Solutions Co., Ltd.       | Korea                   
| | Liacom Systems Ltd.                   | Israel                  
| | Zulu Software Inc.                    | United States           
| | TIS Consultants Ltd.                  | Cyprus                  
| | BluePhoenix Technologies Ltd.         | Israel                  



---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6233

JUAN CELSO ZAVALETA PEREZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

FRANK L. PERRY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-00311-JAB-LPA)

Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juan Celso Zavaleta Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe 

DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Juan Celso Zavaleta Perez seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Perez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 601 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                        August 1, 2017.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
601) entitled ``An Act to enhance the transparency and accelerate the 
impact of assistance provided under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 
to promote quality basic education in developing countries, to better 
enable such countries to achieve universal access to quality basic 
education and improved learning outcomes, to eliminate duplication and 
waste, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)On page 8, line 20, strike ``; and'' and insert ``;''

(2)On page 8, line 23, strike the period at the end and insert ``; 
and''.

(3)On page 8, between lines 23 and 24, insert the following:
                    ``(E) promote United States values, especially 
                respect for all persons and freedoms of religion, 
                speech, and the press.

(4)On page 12, line 14, strike ``; and'' and insert ``;''

(5)On page 12, strike line 17 and insert ``educational systems; and''.

(6)On page 12, between lines 17 and 18, insert the following:
                    ``(C) there is the greatest opportunity to reduce 
                childhood and adolescence exposure to or engagement in 
                violent extremism or extremist ideologies.''.

(7)On page 12, line 20, strike everything after ``Not'' to line 25 and 
insert the following:  later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees a comprehensive United States strategy to be 
carried out during the following five fiscal years to promote quality 
basic education in partner countries by--

(8)On page 18, line 11, strike everything after ``Not'' to line 14 and 
insert the following:  later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal 
year during which the strategy developed pursuant to section 4(a) is 
carried out, the President shall--

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H.R. 601

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
EX-32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MediStaff Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Dale Byers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    Dale ByersDale Byers
Chief Executive Officer and chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2009



















1
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00193-CR

PHILLIP JAY STERLING JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 432nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1583147)

September 28, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief 

Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03 - 19 - 00057 - CV NO. 03 - 19 - 00248 - CV Nadia Longoria, Appellant v. Deran Tolbert, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COUR T AT LAW NO. 1 OF BE LL COUNTY NO S . 84787 & 88225, THE HONORABLE JEANNE PARKER, JUDG E PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N PER CURIAM Nadia Longoria filed two notices of appeal, one referencing trial court cause number 84787 and another referencing trial court cause number 88225, initiating two appeals. However, both appeals appear to be from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Deran Tolbert on Longoria’s claims, which were severed from the remaining claims in the trial court and assigned cause number 88 225. 1 Because these appear to be duplicate ap peals, 2 we consolidate the above
referenced causes. The record s and documents filed in cause number 03
- 1 9
- 00 248
- CV are consolidated into cause number 03
- 1 9
- 00 057
- CV. The consolidated appeal shall proceed under
1 Longoria’s notices of appeal do not identify what order or judgment she is appealing. 2 Longoria’s counsel filed no response to this Court’s letter questioning the propriety of these two appeals.2 cause number 03
- 1 9
- 00 0 5 7
- CV , and cause numbe r 03
- 19
- 00 2 4 8
- CV is dismissed. See Rin g & Ring v. Sharpstown Mall Tex., LLC , No. 01
- 16
- 00321
- CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 6187, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] June 9, 2016 , no pet.) (mem. op) (addressing similar consolidation and dismissal procedure for duplicate appeals ). Briefing will proceed in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith 03
- 19
- 00248
- CV Dismissed 03
- 19
- 00057
- CV Consolidated Filed: June 20, 2019
“ Madison Site (Speculite)
1957-1960 & 1992-1998

Sammary Description

The Madison Site is listed as am Atomics Weapons Employer (1957-1960) and a
Department of Energy facility (1992-1998) under EEOICPA. Dow Chemical operated
the facility under subcontract to Mallinckrodt Chemical Company. Dow received a
purchase order from Mallinckrodt in March 1960, for research and development on the
extrusion of uranium metal and rod. There is no evidence to support the DOE facility
dates for remediation.

Supporting Documents

A January 16, 2000, FUSRAP database report explains that Mallinckrodt
issued a purchase order to the Madison Site for R&D on the extrusion of

1960 uranium metal and rod. The report claims that the facility performed
work for the AEC in the late 1950s, but provides no additional
explanation or evidence.

An Office of Worker Advocacy FUSRAP Data Analysis finds no
1992-1998 | justification for the 1992-1998 DOE designation. No record of

remediation exists.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
       This schedule constains summary financial  information extracted from the
       financial  statements for Sonus Corp. and is qualified in its entirety by
       reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001029260
<NAME>                        Sonus Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                  498
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         4,573
<ALLOWANCES>                           (907)
<INVENTORY>                             499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      5,349
<PP&E>                                8,799
<DEPRECIATION>                        2,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       31,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 9,977
<BONDS>                               2,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                          15,701
<COMMON>                             14,976
<OTHER-SE>                          (11,862)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         31,385
<SALES>                              29,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     33,759
<CGS>                                10,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        28,561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     10,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (4,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (4,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (4,884)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.80)



</TABLE>