alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.28.1



AMENDMENT



THIS AMENDMENT (the Amendment) is entered into as of March 1, 2005, by and between Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (the
Company) and Patricia Hatler (the Executive).



WHEREAS the Company and the Executive have entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2000 (the Employment Agreement), and the parties now wish to amend the Employment Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending
to be legally bound, hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:



1. Section 2.3(b)(vi) is hereby amended to revise the last two sentences to read as follows:



The benefits under this subsection (vi) shall be paid in the same forms and at the same times as Executives benefits under the
applicable Plans described above are paid (or would have been paid had Executives interest in the applicable Plans been fully vested). The benefits payable under this subsection (vi) and subsection (vii) below shall not result in any
duplication of benefits.



2. Section
2.3(b)(vii) is amended by revising the last sentence to read as follows:



The benefits under this subsection (vii) shall be paid in the same forms and at the same times as Executives benefits under the applicable Plans described above are paid (or would have been paid had
Executives interests in the applicable Plans been fully vested).



3. Section 3.4(b)(vii) is revised by amending the last sentence to read as follows:



The benefits under this subsection (vii) shall be paid in the same forms and at the same times as Executives benefits under the
applicable Plans described above are paid (or would have been paid had Executives interests in the applicable Plans been fully vested), as in effect immediately before the Change of Control.





---

4. In all respects not amended, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and
confirmed.



WITNESS the following signatures:



|                |  |  |  |                             |  |        |  | 
|--------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | ------ |  | 
|                |  |  |  | NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
|                |  |  |  | COMPANY                    
|                |  |  | 
|                |  |  |  | By:                         |  |       
|Patricia Hatler |  |  |  |                             |  |       
|                |  |  |  |                            
|Date            |  |  |  |                             |  | Name:  |  | 
|                |  |  |  |                            
|                |  |  |  |                             |  | Title: |  | 



2
MOJO
ORGANICS, INC.


101 Hudson Street, 21st Floor


Jersey City, New Jersey


 


December
15, 2015


Glenn Simpson


101 Hudson Street, 21st Floor


Jersey City, New Jersey


 


		Re:	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated June 15, 2015 by
and between MOJO Organics, Inc. (the “Company”) and Glenn Simpson (“Employee”) 



 


Dear Mr. Simpson:


 


Reference is hereby
made to the Agreement. By executing this letter, the undersigned parties hereby agree that Section 3(b) of the Agreement shall
be amended and restated whereby the number of shares of common stock to be delivered upon
the Company generating revenue of $3,000,000 during any twelve (12) month period during the Initial Term shall be increased
by 337,500 shares. All terms not defined herein shall have the definition as set forth in the Agreement.


 


We kindly request
that you execute this letter below indicating that you agree with the above amendment.


 





	 	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	 	MOJO Organics, Inc.
	 	By:	/s/ Glenn Simpson
	 	Name:	Glenn Simpson
	 	Title:	CEO
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Glenn Simpson	 	 
	Glen Simpson
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 1 44 DB 2022 (No. 10 RST 2023)

:

JOEL L. SCHWARTZ : Attorney Registration No. 76568

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16 th day of February

, 202 3 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinar y Board Member dated January 3 1 , 202 3

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

JOEL L. SCHWARTZ

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, h as demonstrated

that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for

admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active

status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the

Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

PENALTY

STATE.-G^f^AS

OFFICIAfe^i»3f§S

FOR;";: -:|«-

"&& PRIVATE USE

RE: WR-82,592-01

ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ

4 7 E 710. $2 3 !

N«

MJ
Exhibit 32.2

                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Annual Report of Knightsbridge Tankers Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, the Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: May 26, 2005


/s/ Kate Blankenship

Kate Blankenship
Principal Financial Officer

01655.0002 #574642
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Trade Commission announces the revised thresholds for interlocking directorates required by the 1990 amendment of Section 8 of the Clayton Act. Section 8 prohibits, with certain exceptions, one person from serving as a director or officer of two competing corporations if two thresholds are met. Competitor corporations are covered by Section 8 if each one has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than $10,000,000, with the exception that no corporation is covered if the competitive sales of either corporation are less than $1,000,000. Section 8(a)(5) requires the Federal Trade Commission to revise those thresholds annually, based on the change in gross national product. The new thresholds, which take effect immediately, are $25,841,000 for Section 8(a)(1), and $2,584,100 for Section 8(a)(2)(A).

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 21, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James F. Mongoven, Bureau of Competition, Office of Policy and Coordination, (202) 326-2879.

Authority:15 U.S.C. § 19(a)(5)).By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-1040 Filed 1-20-10: 10:52 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-S
----

----

| Company Name                                                   | State of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                                                           |                   |
| M.S.I Multiconn Solutions international  (1995) Ltd. | Israel                 |
| Multiconn Technologies Ltd.                                    | Israel                 |
| Liraz Systems Ltd.                                             | Israel                 |
| Liraz Systems Export (1990) Ltd.                               | Israel                 |
| Liacom Systems Ltd.                                            | Israel                 |
| BluePhoenix Knowledge Management Systems Ltd.                  | Israel                 |
| Ce-Post Ltd.                                                   | Israel                 |
| Outlook&BluePhoenix Ltd.                                   | Israel                 |
| BluePhoenix Solutions B.V                                      | The Netherlands        |
| BluePhoenix Solutions GmbH                                     | Germany                |
| ASE Advanced Systems Europe B.V.                               | The Netherlands        |
| BluePhoenix Solutions Pty Ltd.                                 | Australia              |
| BluePhoenix Solutions Nordic, AS                               | Denmark                |
| BluePhoenix Solutions U.K Limited                              | United Kingdom         |
| BluePhoenix Solutions U.S.A                                    | USA                    |
| BluePhoenix Solutions S.R.L.                                   | Romania                |
| Crystal Sapphire Ltd.                                          | Israel                 |
| Blue Phoenix I-ter S.R.L.                                      | Italy                  |
| Bluephoenix Legacy Modernization s.r.l.                        | Italy                  |
| BridgeQuest Solutions, Inc.                                    | USA                    |
| BridgeQuest, Inc.                                              |                   |
| BridgeQuest Labs, Inc.                                         | USA                    |
| BluePhoenix Solutions Co., Ltd                                 | Korea                  |
| IntraComp Group, Inc.                                          | USA                    |
| Zulu Software, Inc.                                            | USA                    |
| SCH Software Conversion House Ltd.                             | Israel                 |

----

----
- Appendix B
- AppendixB NMI ClaimStatistics.pdf
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10499 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. OWEN DONOVAN POWELL Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-56-ALL Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Owen Donovan Powell seeks leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal and moves for the appointment ofcounsel. Powell has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See United States v. Boutwell , 896 F.2d 884, 889- 90 (5th Cir. 1990) (one-judge order). Powell has presented no arguable legal points for his claim that the district court erroneously determined that his prior Texas conviction was a “drug trafficking offense” that warranted a 16-level United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 27, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-10499

2 enhancement under § 2L1.2. See United States v. Ford, 509 F.3d 714, 715-17 (5th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, Powell’s motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Powell’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as unnecessary. See 5 TH C IR . P LAN UNDER THE C RIMINAL J USTICE A CT , § 2.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE
EXCHANGE ACT

I, L. Melvin Cooper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Forbes Energy Services Ltd;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ L. Melvin CooperL. Melvin Cooper Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)


Date: August 15, 2008
Exhibit 10.41

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT    TO THE BYLAWS    OF    VICINITY CORPORATION  A Delaware Corporation

The undersigned, being the duly acting and appointed Secretary of Vicinity Corporation, a Delaware corporation, hereby certifies that effective June 29,
2001, the Board of Directors of this corporation amended the Bylaws of this corporation to read as follows, effective as of the date set forth below.

Article III,
Section 2 (Number and Qualification of Directors):

The
number of directors of the corporation shall be five (5).

Dated:
June 29, 2001

| |  | /s/MAURY AUSTINMaury Austin, Secretary
| |  | --------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00207

- CR

Israel Montoya Martinez , Appellant

v.
The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2017

- 675 , THE HONORABLE JOHN F
. PHILLIPS , JUDGE PRESIDIN G

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM Appellant’s brief was due Fe bruary 6, 2023

. C ounsel for appellant has filed a
moti on to withdraw as cou nsel because her change in employment requires her to wi th draw . We
grant the motion to withdraw , abate the appeal, and remand the case to the trial court to appoint
substituted counsel to rep resent appell ant on appeal

. Further, the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s record to be prep ared and forwarde d to this Court no later than
Mar ch 8 , 202 3

. It is so ordered Fe bruary 2 4 , 2023

.2 Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: February 24, 2023
Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Gulfstar  Energy,  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Robert, President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/Robert McCann
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Robert McCann, President
Date: May 16, 2011
EXHIBIT
32.2
  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Murals By Maurice, Inc.,
(the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maurice
Katz, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify that:
 
 *   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *   information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  /s/ Maurice
Katz
 Maurice
Katz
 Chief
Financial Officer, Controller
 
 May 15,
2009
 
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nationwide
Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Eileen Kennedy, Senior Vice
PresidentChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



March 1, 2005



|                      |  |                                              
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|/s/ M. Eileen Kennedy
|Name:                 |  | M. Eileen Kennedy                            
|Title:                |  | Senior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.9
                                   NATIONWIDE
                           PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN
                               GENERAL DESCRIPTION

First implemented in 1998, Nationwide maintains the Performance Incentive Plan
(the PIP), which covers certain management employees of the participating
companies based on the achievement of measures tied to the performance of the
relevant operating company, the relevant business unit and the individual
participant over the preceding year. Performance measures are based on a broad
series of key financial results, financial and operational comparison to
external peer comparators, the extent of accomplishment of strategic
initiatives, and other factors and results impacting organization performance,
and further based upon individual employee performance. Under the PIP,
participants are granted a target incentive amount that represents a percentage
of the participant's base salary. The target is established annually and depends
on the participant's position within the participating company. The actual
amount received by the participant under the PIP ranges from zero to no maximum
factor of the participant's base salary, depending solely on the achievement of
the performance measures.