alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATIA
TERMINALS CANADA, INCORPORATED'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0001029102
<NAME>         STATIA TERMINALS CANADA INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
<CURRENCY>     U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                        62
<INVENTORY>                                        323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,334
<PP&E>                                          31,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,984
<BONDS>                                         28,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,505
<SALES>                                            877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,521
<CGS>                                              758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,313
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,313
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,313
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Opinion filed March 31, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-10-00288-CV

__________

ALLEN GLENN THOMAS, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 259th District Court

Jones County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 022100

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Allen Glenn Thomas appeals the trial court’s order declaring him to be a vexatious 

litigant. Appellees Molly Owens and Gaylon Teeters have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction on the basis that the trial court has not entered a final judgment. We 

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant filed the underlying action bearing Trial Court Cause No. 022100 on 

December 17, 2009, against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Owens, Teeters, and 

several other individuals affiliated with TDCJ. On behalf of Owens and Teeters, the Office of 

Attorney General filed a motion to declare appellant a vexatious litigant pursuant to Chapter 11 
2

of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The trial court granted the motion in a written 

order entered on March 31, 2010. Under the terms of the order, appellant was required to furnish 

security in the amount of $7,500 by May 1, 2010. Appellant now appeals the trial court’s order 

declaring him to be a vexatious litigant. In this regard, appellant filed his notice of appeal on 

April 19, 2010.

Appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and only those interlocutory 

orders deemed appealable by the Texas Legislature. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 

191, 195 (Tex. 2001); City of Houston v. Kilburn, 849 S.W.2d 810, 811 (Tex. 1993); see TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 15.003 (Vernon Supp. 2010), § 51.014(a), (d) (Vernon 2008). 

A judgment is final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and claims in the 

record. Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. The clerk’s record does not include a dismissal order or a 

final judgment entered after the March 31, 2010 order. The trial court clerk has confirmed that 

there is no final judgment on the merits and that the underlying action remains pending. 

Furthermore, there is no statutory exception that allows appellant to appeal the trial court’s 

interlocutory order declaring him to be a vexatious litigant. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195; 

City of Houston, 849 S.W.2d at 811.

The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

March 31, 2011

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Morgan Magella, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Midex Gold Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the fiscal
          quarter ended September 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
          attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                     By: /s/ Morgan Magella
                                        ------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Morgan Magella
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                     Date: November 23, 2009
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 13885

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________

TORRENCE SANDERS,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

versus
WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA,

Respondent

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:22

- cv

- 03606

- SEG USCA11 Case: 23-13885 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 06/11/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 13885

____________________
Before R OSENBAUM , N EWSOM , and A BUDU , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdictionbecause Torrence Sanders’s notice of appeal, deemed filed on November 13, 2023, was untimely to appeal from the district court’s Septem ber 5, 2023 final order and judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin. , 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a). The 30

- day, rather than 60

- day

, appeal deadline

a pplies because Sanders’s action was a § 2254 habeas proceeding challenging his state criminal judgment and neither the United States nor any of its agencies or officials were parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b). Finally, although Sanders moved for an extension of time to appeal below, the district court denied his motion and he has not appealed that denial or indicated that he seeks to challenge it on appeal

. R egardless, he was not entitled to an extension of time to appeal or a reopening of the appeal period because his motion for an extension was not filed within 30 days of his appeal deadline, and he received the final order and judgment within 21 days of their entry. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5); Fed. R. A pp. P. 4(a)(6). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. USCA11 Case: 23-13885 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 06/11/2024 Page: 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PEDRO SILVA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 309 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**Exhibit 33.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Housing Income Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeffrey Howard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)     The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2015

By: */s/ Jeff Howard*Jeff HowardPresident and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.41.1



AMENDMENT



THIS AMENDMENT (the Amendment) is entered into as of March 1, 2005, by and between Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (the
Company) and Michael Keller (the Executive).



WHEREAS the Company and the Executive have entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2000 (the Employment Agreement), and the parties now wish to amend the Employment Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending
to be legally bound, hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:



1. Section 2.3(b)(vi) is hereby amended to revise the last two sentences to read as follows:



The benefits under this subsection (vi) shall be paid in the same forms and at the same times as Executives benefits under the
applicable Plans described above are paid (or would have been paid had Executives interest in the applicable Plans been fully vested). The benefits payable under this subsection (vi) and subsection (vii) below shall not result in any
duplication of benefits.



2. Section
2.3(b)(vii) is amended by revising the last sentence to read as follows:



The benefits under this subsection (vii) shall be paid in the same forms and at the same times as Executives benefits under the applicable Plans described above are paid (or would have been paid had
Executives interests in the applicable Plans been fully vested).



3. Section 3.4(b)(vii) is revised by amending the last sentence to read as follows:



The benefits under this subsection (vii) shall be paid in the same forms and at the same times as Executives benefits under the
applicable Plans described above are paid (or would have been paid had Executives interests in the applicable Plans been fully vested), as in effect immediately before the Change of Control.





---

4. In all respects not amended, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and
confirmed.



WITNESS the following signatures:



|               |  |  |  |                             |  |        |  | 
|-------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | ------ |  | 
|               |  |  |  | NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
|               |  |  |  | COMPANY                    
|               |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  | By:                         |  |       
|Michael Keller |  |  |  |                             |  |       
|               |  |  |  |                            
|Date           |  |  |  |                             |  | Name:  |  | 
|               |  |  |  |                            
|               |  |  |  |                             |  | Title: |  | 



2
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories 

1090 Tusculum Avenue 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938 

 Phone: 513-533-6825 

 Fax: 513-533-6826 

January 9, 2018 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00238 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Acting Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as 

required by 42 C.F.R. §83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to 

designate a class of employees from the Idaho National Laboratory in Scoville, Idaho, as an addition 

to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000. On November 22, 2017, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 

§7384q(b), the Acting Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition 

to the SEC: 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors 

and subcontractors who worked at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in Scoville, Idaho, 

and who were monitored for external radiation at the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant (CPP) 

(e.g., at least one film badge or TLD dosimeter from CPP) between January 1, 1975, and 

December 31, 1980, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring 

solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters 

established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on December 22, 2017, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 

§7384l(14)(C). Therefore, beginning on December 22, 2017, members of this class of employees, 

defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

[Signature on File]

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
H. R. 609 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs health care center in Center 

Township, Butler County, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Abie Abraham VA Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) Abie Abraham of Lyndora, Pennsylvania, was stationed 

during World War II with the 18th Infantry in New York; 

3 years with the 14th Infantry in Panama; 15th Infantry, 

unassigned in China, while the U.S.S. Panay was sunk; 30th 

Infantry, Presidio, San Francisco; and the 31st Infantry, 

Manila, Philippines, for 9 years. 

(2) During World War II, Abraham fought, was captured, 

endured the Bataan Death March and as a prisoner of war 

for 31⁄2 years, was beaten, stabbed, shot, survived malaria 

and starvation to be rescued by the 6th Rangers. 

(3) Abraham stayed behind at the request of General 

Douglas MacArthur for 21⁄2 more years disinterring the bodies 

of his fallen comrades from the Bataan Death March and the 

prison camps, helping to identify their bodies and see that 

they were properly laid to rest. 

(4) After his promotion in 1945, Abraham came back to 

the United States where he served as a recruiter and then 

also served 2 years in Germany until his retirement with 30 

years of service as a Master Sergeant. 

(5) Abraham received numerous medals for his service, 

including the Purple Heart, and had several documentaries 

on the Discovery Channel and History Channel. 

(6) Abraham wrote the books ‘‘Ghost of Bataan Speaks’’ 

in 1971 and ‘‘Oh, God, Where Are You’’ in 1977 to help the 

public better understand what our brave men endured at the 

hands of the Imperial Japanese Army as prisoners of war. 

(7) Abraham was a life member of the Veterans of Foreign 

Wars, the American Legion, the Purple Heart Combat/Infantry 

Organization, the American Ex-POWs, the Disabled American 

Veterans, and the American Defenders of Bataan. 

(8) Abraham was a volunteer at Veterans Affairs Butler 

Healthcare for 23 years from 1988 to 2011 and had 36,851 

service hours caring for our veterans. 

SEC. 2. ABIE ABRAHAM VA CLINIC. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Affairs health 

care center in Center Township, Butler County, Pennsylvania, shall 
H. R. 609—2 

after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Abie Abraham VA Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the health 

care center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

a reference to the ‘‘Abie Abraham VA Clinic’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wi-Max Communications,  Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Frank R. Ventura,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 13, 2009



By:  /s/ Frank R. Ventura
     ----------------------------------
     Frank R. Ventura
     Chief Financial Officer
Order entered August 4, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00198
- CR
CHRISTOPHER BRIAN CH OATE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 006
- 86254
- 2013



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether ap pellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial co urt shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effect ive representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Greenrock Ventures, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:


The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                                 /s/ William Tay
                                 ----------------------------
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executive Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer


Date: July 12, 2010
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00153

- CR

Joshua Echuala Bradley

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 144th District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013CR8778

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 1, 2016.
Exhibit 32.1   Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Steve Bergstrom, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Silver Hill Mines, Inc., (the Company), herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Dated: November 3, 2008 /s/  Steve Bergstrom President and CEO