alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Scott Cramer, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Affinity Mediaworks Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2011, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

By:

*/s/ Scott Cramer*

 

Name:

Scott Cramer

 

Title:

Chief Executive Officer and

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Date:

July 6, 2011

                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rayovac Corporation (the Company) for the Annual period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall J. Steward, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|       |  |                          
|------ |  | -------------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/    RANDALL J. STEWARD
|Name:  |  | Randall J. Steward       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer  



Date: December 14, 2004



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
March 30, 2012 

Dear Dr. Ziemer, 

 I’m writing this letter in response to the recent TBD-6000 Work Group meeting concerning General 

Steel Industries. After listening to the March 28, 2012 meeting, I would like for you and Wanda I. Munn 

to know that I am extremely displeased with the recommendations that both of you made toward SEC105. Although Dr. Anigstein of SC&A stated that (next to no information exist for the first 4 years) from 

1953 to mid 1957, it’s obvious that you and Wanda I. Munn still believe that accurate radiation doses 

can be estimated for GSI employees without data for those particular years. There is absolutely no 

possible way to reconstruct accurate doses without data. As for the years of mid 1957 to mid 1962, the 

only information available for GSI employees is testimony from one GSI employee that worked 

weekends only, one photograph of GSI in the early years, one letter from Dr Konnecker and 1 film badge 

reading. I simply cannot believe that both of you feel that this is sufficient data to base accurate 

bounding doses on hundreds or thousands of employees. This type of accuracy is unacceptable. 

 I find it very interesting that more than 6 years ago the Department of Labor insisted that all 

documentation such as proof of cancer diagnosis, employment records, etc. must be presented in order 

to proceed with my father’s workers compensation claim. Although proof was given that my 

grandfather was employed at GSI, the DOL denied my father’s claim because they said he had to work in 

the casting department at GSI. My father did provide this information as well. As a clamant, my father 

was required to show accurate proof, but yet it appears that NIOSH isn’t required to show proof of 

accuracy to the TBD-6000 Work Group. This standard of business is highly unacceptable and very 

unprofessional. 

 As I sit here today and think about all the new information that came out about GSI over the past 6 

years, I must thank Dr. McKeel for his persistence in finding information and true facts about GSI. I must 

also thank Mr. Ramspott for all the time spent sifting and sorting through limited amounts information 

as well. It appears to me that NIOSH really didn’t try or want to know the truth about GSI. The reason I 

say this is because most information regarding GSI was found by either Dr. McKeel or Mr. Ramspott. As 

of right now, I will never accept the fact the accurate doses can be reconstructed for any GSI employee 

from 1953-1963 due to the lack of accurate information and the very limited amount of information 

available for those years. It truly saddens me to think that these brave GSI employees came through for 

all Americans when they were called upon during the cold war era but yet when it’s time to help the GSI 

employees and their survivors, the TBD-6000 Work Group simply fails. Thank you very much for your 

time. 

 Kent Wall
The Honorable Thomas D. Thalken, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

District of Nebraska. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3584

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Nebraska. 

Robert Norman, also known as Bubba, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: July 24, 1998

 Filed: August 5, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Robert Norman pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine in

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (1994). Although Norman was initially

granted release pending sentencing, the magistrate judge later revoked release after

1

finding that Norman had violated various release conditions. At sentencing, the District
The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of 2

Nebraska. 

-2-

Court determined Norman had a Guidelines imprisonment range of 57 to 71 months, 2

and the government moved for a downward departure pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e)

(1994) and U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1, p.s. (1995) based on

Norman&s substantial assistance, recommending a sentence “somewhere around a three

year range.” The Court granted the government&s motion, but sentenced Norman to 48

months imprisonment and five years supervised release because of his pretrial release

conduct. On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the extent of the departure was

insufficient, given the government&s sentencing recommendation. We affirm.

Because counsel is merely objecting to the extent of the District Court&s

downward departure, this challenge is unreviewable. See United States v. Goodwin,

72 F.3d 88, 89, 91 (8th Cir. 1995) (extent of district court&s downward departure under

§ 3553(e) and § 5K1.1 is unreviewable on appeal). Counsel also suggests that the

Court improperly punished Norman by considering his pretrial release conduct in

fashioning its sentence. This argument is merely a variation of counsel&s unreviewable

challenge to the extent of the departure, and we also note the District Court stated at

sentencing that Norman would be given credit for the time he was incarcerated pending

sentencing.

We have reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), for any nonfrivolous issues for appeal, and have found none.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. Counsel&s motion to

withdraw is hereby granted.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Eltek Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Arieh Reichart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Arieh Reichart *

Arieh ReichartPresident and Chief
Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

April 30, 2009

*     The originally executed copy of
this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made
available for inspection upon request.



---

---
Exhibit 10.1


 





TERRY L. JOHNSON, CPA


406 Greyford Lane


Casselberry, Florida 32707


Phone 407-721-4753


Fax/Voice Message 866-813-3428


E-mail cpatlj@yahoo.com


 


December 16, 2015


 


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street


Washington D.C. 20549


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


I have read the Company’s statements included under Explanatory
Note and Item 4.01 in the Form 8-K/A dated December 17, 2015, of WhereverTV Broadcasting Corporation (the “Company”)
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and we agree with such statements as they relate to our firm. I have
no basis to, and therefore, do not agree or disagree with the other statements made by the Company in the Form 8-K/A.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ Terry L. Johnson                                   


Terry L. Johnson, CPA


Casselberry, Florida
Exhibit 4.12

 


	
Number
   C-
    	
 
    	
Incorporated Under the Laws of the State of Delaware
    	
 
    	
Shares
   -0-
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Cusip No.
    




 

LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION

 

Series C Liberty Media Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

 

Specimen Certificate

 

This Certifies that [               ] is the owner of [               ] FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES C LIBERTY MEDIA COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, OF LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

 

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.

 

Dated:

 

Liberty Media Corporation

 

[Corporate Seal]

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    	
Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12
                                                                      ----------

Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED
SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                       February 4,
                                                                                                          1997
                                                                                                       (inception)
                                                                                                       to December
                                                               Years ended December 31,                    31,
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------  --------------
(dollars in thousands)                                   2001        2000        1999         1998         1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>

Earnings..........................................      $8,619      $8,619       $8,619      $8,619       $7,781
                                                      ========     =======      =======     =======       ======

Fixed charges.....................................      $   --      $   --       $   --      $   --       $   --
Preferred securities distributions................       8,360       8,360        8,360       8,360        7,547
                                                      --------     -------      -------     -------       ------
Total combined fixed charges and
    preferred securities distributions............      $8,360      $8,360       $8,360      $8,360       $7,547
                                                      ========     =======      =======     =======       ======


Ratio of earnings to combined
    fixed charges and preferred
    securities distributions......................        1.03        1.03         1.03        1.03         1.03
                                                      ========     =======      =======     =======       ======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

     I, G. Reed Petersen, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Sears Oil & Gas Corporation (the "Company") certify that:

 

     1. I have reviewed the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Sears Oil & Gas Corporation;

 

     2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; and

 

     3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in thisamended quarterly report.

 

Date:  February 14, 2013

 

 

 

/s/ G. Reed Petersen

__________________

G. Reed Petersen,

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 8317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-698]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (Eastern Time).

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status: Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Parts Open to the Public

    1. Approval of the minutes of the January 22, 2008 Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.
    b. Monthly Investment Performance Report.
    c. Legislative Report.
    d. Review of FRTIB Office Space Use.
    3. Department of Labor Audit Report.
    4. TSP Systems Modernization Update.
    5. Review of 2008 Board Meeting Calendar.

Parts Closed to the Public

    6. Review of Confidential Vendor Financial Data.
    7. Personnel.

Contact Person For More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: February 11, 2008.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 08-698 Filed 2-11-08; 3:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6078 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6078

   To provide for the boundary of the Palo Alto Battlefield National 
Historic Park to be adjusted, to authorize the donation of land to the 
    United States for addition to that historic park, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2018

   Mr. Vela introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the boundary of the Palo Alto Battlefield National 
Historic Park to be adjusted, to authorize the donation of land to the 
    United States for addition to that historic park, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOUNDARY; LEGAL DESCRIPTION.

    (a) Boundary.--Section 3(b)(2) of the Palo Alto Battlefield 
National Historic Site Act of 1991 (16 U.S.C. 410nnn-1(b)(2)) is 
amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``consist of approximately'' and 
                inserting the following: ``consist of--
                            ``(i) the approximately'';
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) on the date that such land is 
                        donated to the United States, the approximately 
                        166.44 acres of land generally depicted on the 
                        map entitled `PALO ALTO BATTLEFIELD NATIONAL 
                        HISTORICAL PARK Proposed Boundary Addition, 
                        Fort Brown Unit', numbered 469/143,589, and 
                        dated April 2018.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``map'' and inserting 
        ``maps''.
    (b) Legal Description.--Section 3(b)(3) of the Palo Alto 
Battlefield National Historic Site Act of 1991 (16 U.S.C. 410nnn-
1(b)(3)) is amended by striking ``after'' and all that follows through 
``Secretary of the Interior'' and inserting ``after the addition of 
lands to the historic park boundary, the Secretary of the Interior''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered May 15, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00565-CV

JW GST EXEMPT TRUST AND JAMES Y. WYNNE, Appellants

V.

WRENO S. WYNNE, WILLIAM B. WYNNE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 86th District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 84117-86

ORDER

By notice filed May 13, 2015, appellee American Liberty Oil Company, LP has informed 

the Court it has filed for bankruptcy. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.2, further 

action in this cause is automatically suspended. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. Accordingly, for 

administrative purposes, this cause is ABATED and treated as a closed case. It may be 

reinstated on motion by any party showing, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 8.3, 

that the appeal is permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. See id. 8.3. 

.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00175

- CV

Joe Henderson v. Marilyn Kay Blalock

On a ppeal from the 149th District Court of Brazoria County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 78654

- CV

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. Aug ust 3, 2017