alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





*Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*





In
      connection with the Annual Report of ZAP (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for
      the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven M. Schneider, as Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Steven M. SchneiderSteven
                M. SchneiderTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date:
                May 1, 2006








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Order entered October 23, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00935-CR

No. 05-19-00936-CR

CHRISTIN LEE GORBY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F19-00375-T & F18-29750-T

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s October 21, 2020 second motion for an 

extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s 

brief received along with the motion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.2
  Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of
2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GMS Capital Corp.. (the “Company”) on
Form 10–Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:
  1.      
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.      
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/
      George MetrakosGeorge
      Metrakos
                    Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer
 
 Dated: December 1,
2009
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 11, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-946]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 956


Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Disciplinary Action 
for Violations of Restrictions on Post-Employment Activity

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service is removing the Rules of Practice in 
Proceedings Relative to Disciplinary Action for Violations of 
Restrictions on Post-Employment Activity.

DATES: Effective Date:
    March 11, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane M. Mego, (703) 812-1905.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal Service is removing the Rules of 
Practice in Proceedings Relative to Disciplinary Action for Violations 
of Restrictions on Post-Employment Activity. These provisions have been 
superseded by the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the 
Executive Branch issued by the Office of Government Ethics. This 
revision is a mandated charge in the agency rules of procedure before 
the Judicial Officer and, therefore, it is appropriate for its adoption 
by the Postal Service to become effective immediately.
    Accordingly, the Postal Service removes and reserves 39 CFR part 
956 as set forth below:

PART 956--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

0
1. Remove and reserve Part 956.

Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 08-946 Filed 3-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Media Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 11, 2011





By:  /s/Dean Li


Dean Li


President, Chief Executive Officer
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, Wisconsin

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

Michael H. Gibson

 Franklin, Ohio

Mark A. Griffon

 Salem, New Hampshire

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

Robert W. Presley

 Seymour, Tennessee

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

September 14, 2011

The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Madam Secretary:

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has evaluated 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00173 concerning workers at the 

Norton Company in Worcester, Massachusetts, under the statutory 

requirements established by the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA) and incorporated into 42 CFR 

Sec. 83.13. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 

has recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for all 

Atomic Weapons Employees who worked in any building or area at the facility 

owned by Norton Co. (or a subsequent owner) in Worcester, Massachusetts, 

from October 11, 1962 through October 31, 2009.

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and other 

information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with sufficient 

accuracy for members of this group, and therefore a class covering this group 

should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs with this determination.

Enclosed is supporting documentation from the August 23-25, 2011, Board 

meeting held in Richland, Washington, and earlier meetings where this potential 

class for the SEC was discussed. If any of these items are unavailable at this 

time, they will follow shortly. 

 Sincerely,

 [Signature on file]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH

 Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 16, 2010, Lonza Riverside, 900 River Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleGamma hydroxybutyric acid (2010)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
II
 The company plans to manufacture bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than June 29, 2010. Dated: April 26, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-10116 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories 

4676 Columbia Parkway 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

Phone: 877-222-7570 

Fax: 513-533-6826 

November 4, 2013 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00046 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC) in Fernald, Ohio, as an 

addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000. On September 30, 2013, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the 

SEC: 

All employees of the Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC) in Fernald, Ohio, who were 

not employed by National Lead of Ohio, NLO, or the Department of Energy or its predecessor 

agencies, who worked at FMPC from January 1, 1951, through December 31, 1983, for a 

number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this 

employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or 

more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

 

This designation became effective on October 30, 2013, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on October 30, 2013, members of this class of employees, defined as 

reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

 [Signature on File]

 Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS
CURT W I L L I AM SPENCE, Ap pe lla nt,
v. WEL L S FARGO B ANK, N.A ., WACHOVI A B ANK, NA TI ONAL AS S OC I ATI ON & GREGORY COURSON, Ap pe lle e s. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 09 -0 00 39 -C V

Appea l from the 14th District Court of Da llas County , Texas (TC# 08-00120-A )

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION P end in g b efo re the Court is A pp e lla nt’ s mo tio n to dis mis s th is a pp e a l pu rs ua nt t o T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1( a)( 1) beca use Appellant no longe r desires to prose cute the a ppeal. We g rant the mot ion and dis mis s th e a

pp e a l w ithpr e

jud ic e . Cos ts ar e a sse sse d ag a ins t the pa rt y inc ur ri ngthe m. SeeT EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d).
October 7, 2009 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, J ustice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l ur e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Ketchikan, Alaska, May 19, 2010. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss potential projects under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2008.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held May 19, 2010 at 6 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the Ketchikan—Misty Fjords Ranger District, 3031 Tongass Avenue, Ketchikan, Alaska. Send written comments to Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee, co District Ranger, USDA Forest Service, 3031 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan, AK 99901, or electronically to Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator at                         *ddaniels@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane Daniels, RAC Coordinator Ketchikan-Misty Fjords Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 228-4105.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: April 22, 2010.

Jeff DeFreest,

District Ranger.

[FR Doc. 2010-10034 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7540

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DUVALL HUCKS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-267-AW, CA-00-2970-AW) Submitted: January 30, 2002 Decided: March 11, 2002 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Duvall Hucks, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Upon review of the entire record, we reject all of Hucks’ claims concerning an alleged conflict of interest on the part of his first counsel. 2 PER CURIAM:Duvall Hucks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * United States v. Hucks , Nos. CR-95-267-AW;CA-00-2970-AW (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2001). We deny Hucks’ Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2). United States v. Kinter , 235 F.3d 192, 199-201 (4th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, U.S. , 121 S. Ct. 1393 (2001). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I



Written Statement of Trustee Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

as Adopted by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert F. Clarke, Regular Trustee of the Trust and Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The consolidated information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition as of December 31, 2003 and results of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2003 of the consolidated Trust.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                  |  |                        
|--------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                                 
|                                  | 
|By:                               |  | /s/    Robert F. Clarke
|                                  |  |                        
|Robert F. Clarke* Regular
Trustee



Date:
March 17, 2004



|* | Robert F. Clarke functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Trust for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60544 Summary Calendar

BASIL UZOMA ONYIDO , Petitioner ,

v.
ERIC H. HOLD ER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A029 891 590

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Basil Uzoma Onyido seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his m otion to sua sponte r eopen a nd

r econsider his 1999 deportation

. See In re Onyido , 22 I. & N. Dec. 552 (BIA 1999). This was the second such motion Onyido filed in 2013 , almost 14 years after he was deported

. The BIA denied the motion as both time

- barred and number

- barred, regardless of how it was construed. The BIA also found no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 20, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60544 Document: 00512567740 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2014N o. 13

- 60544

exceptional circumstances to justify reopening, and it noted that relief was barred by Onyido’s deportation. In his petition for review, Onyido challenges his deportation and the un d erlying aggrav a ted felony conviction. Onyido invoked the BIA’s authority to sua spon te reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2. Section 1003.2(a) affords an Immigration Judge (IJ) or the BIA “complete discretion” to deny a motion to reopen, and we therefore have “no legal standard by which to judge” such a decision. Ramos

- Bonilla v. Mukasey , 543 F.3d 216, 220 (5th Cir. 2008). We accordingly lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision. See id. ; Enriquez

- Alvarado v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 246, 249

- 50 (5th Cir. 2004) (citing other circuits’ decisions holding the same). Onyido’s petition for review is DISMISSED. All motions are DENIED.

2 Case: 13-60544 Document: 00512567740 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/20/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         407,694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,134,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,022,043
<INVENTORY>                                  4,627,251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,221,513
<PP&E>                                       8,754,421
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,522,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,337,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,090,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,909
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,134,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,337,715
<SALES>                                     15,443,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,443,432
<CGS>                                        9,152,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,176,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (10,627)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             702,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,577,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,577,684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,577,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>