alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

**Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code****, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of ARC EnergyTrust (“ARC”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, John P. Dielwart, President and Chief Executive Officer ofARC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ARC.

 

 
| signed *“John P.  Dielwart”*       |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         |
| Name: John P. Dielwart                       |
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                         |
| March 25, 2008                          |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41228

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD GRANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:98-CV-199

USDC No. 6:94-CR-47-2

--------------------

April 26, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald Grant, federal prisoner # 05073-078, appeals the

district court’s denial of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He has raised several issues, such as

whether his plea was voluntary, whether he carried a weapon “in

relation to” a drug-trafficking offense, and whether the

Government engaged in “outrageous conduct,” for which he was not 
No. 98-41228 

-2-

granted a certificate of appealability (COA). These issues are

therefore not properly before the court. See Lackey v. Johnson,

116 F.3d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir. 1997).

This court granted COA on one issue – whether the Government

has set forth a sufficient factual basis to support Grant’s

guilty plea to using and carrying a weapon during and in relation

to a drug-trafficking offense because the drug listed in the

information was not the substance actually distributed. Grant

failed to raise this issue before the district court, and the

lower court therefore did not have an opportunity to address the

merits of this issue. Consequently, this court does not have

jurisdiction to address the merits of this question. 

See Whitehead v. Johnson, 157 F.3d 384, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1998). 

The district court’s denial of Grant’s § 2255 motion is AFFIRMED.

Grant has also filed a motion to strike the Government’s

brief, a motion for bond pending appeal, a motion for leave to

supplement the record and for the court to take judicial notice,

a motion to expedite the appeal, and two motions for summary

judgment. These motions are DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Savings Financial Group, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Larry W.
Myers, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.





DATE:  May 14,
      2010
                  BY:
                  /s/ Larry W. MyersLarry
      W. MyersPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 28, 2024

No. 04-23-01077-CV

Hannah ROBERTS,

Appellant

v.

Jason BURNETT,

Appellee

From the 456th District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23-0619-CV-E

Honorable Heather H. Wright, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION. Because appellant is indigent, no costs of this appeal are assessed. 

We DENY AS MOOT appellee Jason Burnett’s motion to dismiss.

It is so ORDERED on February 28, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of February, 2024.

_____________________________

Tommy Stolhandske, 

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of KRYPTIC  ENTERTAINMENT  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2009,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John
Lagourgue,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ John Lagourgue
                                  ----------------------------------------------
Date: July 23, 2009               John Lagourgue
                                  President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Santos Resource Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Richard Pierce, President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

| Date: October 14, 2009
 
/s/ Richard Pierce
 
 
Richard		Pierce		President and Treasurer 		(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Santos Resource Corp. and will be retained by Santos Resource Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.] |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1444 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1444

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the 60-month 
 limit and increase the income limitation on the student loan interest 
                               deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 1999

Mr. Grassley (for himself and Mr. Burns) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the 60-month 
 limit and increase the income limitation on the student loan interest 
                               deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 60-MONTH LIMIT AND INCREASE IN INCOME 
              LIMITATION ON STUDENT LOAN INTEREST DEDUCTION.

    (a) Elimination of 60-Month Limit.--
            (1) In general.--Section 221 of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 (relating to interest on education loans) is amended by 
        striking subsection (d) and by redesignating subsections (e), 
        (f), and (g) as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 6050S(e) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``section 221(e)(1)'' and inserting 
        ``section 221(d)(1)''.
            (3) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection 
        shall apply with respect to any loan interest paid after 
        December 31, 1999, in taxable years ending after such date.
    (b) Increase in Income Limitation.--
            (1) In general.--Section 221(b)(2)(B) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amount of reduction) is 
        amended by striking clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting the 
        following:
                            ``(i) the excess of--
                                    ``(I) the taxpayer's modified 
                                adjusted gross income for such taxable 
                                year, over
                                    ``(II) $50,000 (twice such dollar 
                                amount in the case of a joint return), 
                                bears to
                            ``(ii) $15,000.''
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 221(g)(1) of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``$40,000 and $60,000 amounts'' and 
        inserting ``$50,000 amount''.
            (3) Effective date.--The amendments made by this subsection 
        shall apply to taxable years ending after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Presidential Documents

27457 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 92 

Monday, May 12, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8253 of May 8, 2008 

Mother’s Day, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On Mother’s Day, we honor the grace, wisdom, and strength of our mothers, 

and we celebrate the special bonds shared between mothers and their children. 

Mothers work tirelessly to help their children build healthy and successful 

lives. Through their positive examples and countless acts of kindness, mothers teach the values of generosity and compassion and the importance of 

family and community. As President Ronald Reagan said, ‘‘From our mothers, 

we first learn about values and caring and the difference between right 

and wrong.’’ By providing a nurturing environment where their children 

can grow in confidence and character, mothers lay the foundation for the 

next generation of Americans to realize their full potential. 

Our Nation is grateful for the sacrifices mothers make every day and for 

the unconditional love they give their children. We are especially thankful 

for the mothers who support their sons and daughters serving in our Armed 

Forces and for the mothers who bring honor to the uniform of the United 

States by defending our freedom at home and abroad. 

Every child blessed with a mother’s love has been given one of life’s great 

gifts. On this Mother’s Day, we recognize the extraordinary contributions 

America’s mothers make to their children, their families, and our country. 

To honor mothers, the Congress, by a joint resolution approved May 8, 

1914, as amended (38 Stat. 770), has designated the second Sunday in 

May each year as ‘‘Mother’s Day’’ and has requested the President to call 

for its appropriate observance. May God bless mothers across America on 

this special day and throughout the year. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim May 11, 2008, as Mother’s Day. I encourage 

all Americans to show their gratitude and love to mothers for making a 

difference in the lives of their children, families, and communities. I call 

upon citizens to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, 

and activities. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
27458 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 92 / Monday, May 12, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day 

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08–1257 

Filed 5–9–08; 11:24 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Lightbridge Corp.: Exhibit 10.15 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.15 

CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 

TO 

AGREEMENT NO. EDC10017 (ECD-CON-10-001)


BETWEEN 

EMIRATES NUCLEAR ENERGY CORPORATION
      

(ENEC)

AND

LIGHTBRIDGE CORPORATION 

FOR 

NUCLEAR ENERGY CONSULTANCY SERVICES 




AGREEMENT CHANGE ORDER 

	
    AGREEMENT NO : EDC10017 (ECD-CON-10-001) 
	
      CHANGE ORDER No.: 05 
	
      EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL
      08th, 2012 

	
      AGREEMENT TITLE :  NUCLEAR ENERGY CONSULTANCY
  SERVICES 

	
  CONTRACTOR:             LIGHTBRIDGE CORPORATION 

	
  DURATION:                   JANUARY 01, 2012 TO DECEMBER 31, 2012

	
      PREAMBLE: 

	
      Change Order No. 05 is Customer's formal approval of the
      Change to the above Agreement No. EDC10017 (ECD- CON-10-001). 

	
      CHANGE ORDER DETAILS: 

	
      This Change Order No. 5 is made to add budget of AED
      115,000.00 (equivalent to USD 31,309.55) in order to cover the new task of
      prepare briefing presentation to the board of directors on the EUP
      procurement. The total lump sum Price for Change Order No. 5 is USD
      31,309.55. The revised Agreement value will be USD 2,233,667.37 

	
      EFFECT ON AGREEMENT SCHEDULE: 

	
      The Agreement schedule shall remain unchanged. 

	
      TERMS AND CONDITIONS: 

	
           •     Except as
      otherwise stated in this Change Order No. 05, all other terms and
      conditions of the original Agreement shall remain unchanged. 

	
      EFFECT ON AGREEMENT PRICE: 

	
           •     Original
      Agreement Value (USD) 
	1,877,600.00 
	
           •     Change
      Order No. 01 Value (USD) 
	0.00 
	
           •     Change
      Order No. 02 Value (USD) 
	469,400.00 
	
           •     Change
      Order No. 03 Value (USD) 
	0.00 
	
           •     Change
      Order No. 04 Value (USD) 
	(-144,642.18) 
	
           •     Change
      Order No. 05 Value (USD 
	31,309.55 
	Revised Contract Value (USD) 	2,233,667.37 


SIGNATORIES 

IN WITNESS of which each of the parties has signed this
Agreement Change Order No. 05 on the Effective Date: 

	  	 	By: 	/s/
      Saleh Al Shehhi 
	SIGNED by 	) 	
	For and on behalf of Emirates Nuclear 	) 	Name: Saleh Al Shehhi 
	Energy Corporation (ENEC) 	) 	Title: Executive Director Supply
      Chain 
	  	 	Date: 23/05/2012 
	  	 	  
	  	 	By: 	/s/
      James Guerra 
	SIGNED by 	) 	
	For and on behalf of Lightbridge 	) 	Name: James Guerra 
	Corporation 	) 	Title: COO 
	  	 	Date: April 15, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STATIA TERMINALS INTERNATIONAL N.V.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001029101
<NAME>                        STATIA TERMINALS INTERNATIONAL N.V.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         3,632
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (804)
<INVENTORY>                                    3,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25,255
<PP&E>                                         236,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,357)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,583
<BONDS>                                        101,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,271
<SALES>                                        106,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,343
<CGS>                                          95,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                   780
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,483
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,743)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,260)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wi-Max Communications,  Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Michael Willis, Chief
Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 19, 2009



By:  /s/ Michael Willis
     ----------------------------------
     Michael Willis
     Chief Executive Officer
#### G. A. Cater *v. L.*C. Taylor *et al.*

(CC 584)

Submitted March 23, 1938.

Decided April 9, 1938.

*Mahan, Bacon & White,*for plaintiff.

*Love & Love,*for defendants.

Hatcher, Judge:

An automobile owned by L. C. Taylor and driven by his son collided with one driven by Mrs. Louie Cater, who was accompanied by her husband. L. C. sued Louie for damages done to the Taylor car by the collision, and recovered a small default judgment which was paid. The car driven by Mrs. Cater belonged to her husband’s brother, G. A. Cater, who now sues the Taylors for damages done to the Cater car in the collision. They plead the judgment of L. C. against Louie, as *res*judicata. The circuit court overruled the demurrer to the plea, and certified here its sufficiency.

In addition to the judgment, the plea alleged that G. A. *94and Louie lived together and were in business together; that G. A. was fully informed of the action of L. C. against Louie, and of the judgment taken therein; and that G. A. and L. C. had automobile accident liability insurance policies in the same insurance company. The position of counsel supporting the plea, as stated in their brief is this: “The doctrine of *res judicata,*is not limited to those persons who may have been parties to a previous suit in reference to the same matter which is in controversy in the second suit, but the doctrine applies to the privies as well as to the parties. The record (the plea) shows that there was privity in blood, privity in business, and privity by reason of the contract between Louie Cater and G. A. Cater and Standard Accident Insurance Company of Detroit.”

Privity, in a legal sense, ordinarily denotes “mutual or successive relationship to the same rights of property.” *Gerber*v. *Thompson,*84 W. Va. 721, 727, 100 S. E. 733. Accord: 50 C. J., Privity, section 1. Since Louie did not own the automobile his wife was driving, and is not shown having a right to sue for damages thereto, it cannot be said that any *mutual or successive relationship*to that right ever' existed between him and G. A.

Therefore, the doctrine of *res judicata*is not applicable, and the ruling of the circuit court on the demurrer to the plea is reversed.

*Ruling reversed.*