alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose                           ( print page 6985)                        confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Grants Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         February 28-29, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Helen Lin, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Plaza One, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-594-4952,                         *linh1@mail.nih.gov*.                    

Dated: January 30, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 08-505  Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of GMS Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ George MetrakosGeorge Metrakos

Chief Executive Officer





Dated: November 1, 2010
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE
EXCHANGE ACT

I, John E. Crisp, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Forbes Energy Services Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ John E. CrispJohn E. CrispChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: May 19, 2009



39
Exhibit
32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Cannabis Science, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Kane, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date:
 April 12, 2019



/s/
Benjamin Tam
Benjamin Tam
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: November 15, 2010
    By:
    /s/ KELLY ANDERSONKELLY ANDERSONExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

ELIZABETH JENNIFER BARTOLAI,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 2310 and 2377 Disciplinary Docket 

No. 3

No. 167 DB 2016

Attorney Registration No. 62355

(Luzerne County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the Verified 

Statement of Resignation, Elizabeth Jennifer Bartolai is disbarred on consent from the 

Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, see Pa. R.D.E. 215, and she shall comply 

with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary 

Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 83 (Friday, April 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22871-22872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 12142 and <greek-i> 12143]


Connecticut Disaster <greek-i> CT-00015

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Connecticut 
(FEMA--1904--DR), dated 04/23/2010.
    Incident: Severe storms and flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/12/2010 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 04/23/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/22/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/24/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and

[[Page 22872]]

Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 04/23/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Fairfield, Middlesex, New London.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere....     3.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere.     3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere.     3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 121426 
and for economic injury is 121436.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-10073 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support

Program Evaluation Report

Document Number: DCAS-PER-072

Effective Date: 7/11/2016

Revision No. 0

Seymour Specialty Wiring Company Page 1 of 2

Author: Signature on file Date: 7/11/2016 

 Dave Allen, HP Team Leader

Approval: Signature on file Date: 7/11/2016 

 J.W. Neton, Associate Director for Science

Supersedes: None

RECORD OF ISSUE/REVISIONS

ISSUE 

AUTHORIZATION 

DATE

7/11/2016

EFFECTIVE 

DATE

7/11/2016

REV. NO. 

0

DESCRIPTION

New document to determine the effect of 

issuing revision 1 to Appendix CD of 

Battelle-TBD-6000 (Seymour Specialty 

Wiring) on previously completed claims.

1.0 Description

Dose reconstructions for the claims from the Seymour Specialty Wiring Company 

(Seymour) were originally performed individually using site research. On 7/16/2007 

Appendix CD to Bettelle-TBD-6000 was issued as a site profile for the site. On 

4/23/2015 revision 1 to this document was issued to incorporate changes made in revision 

1 of Battelle-TBD-6000 as well as changes to programmatic practices. This PER 

(DCAS-PER-072) evaluates the effect of the changes on all previously completed claims.

2.0 Issue Evaluation

Both revision 0 and revisions 1 of Appendix CD contained a prescriptive dose estimate. 

Changes to the prescribed dose estimate include an increase in ingestion dose during the 

residual period as well as other changes. 

Because all the previously completed Seymour claims had employment in the residual 

period, at least some of the dose would increase from revision 0 to revision 1. Also, the 

effect of revision 1 on those completed individual using site research is unclear. 

Therefore, all previously completed claims with a probability of causation (POC) less 

than 50% were evaluated under this PER and no further itemizing of changes to methods 

is necessary.
Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support

Program Evaluation Plan

Document Number: DCAS-PER-072

Effective Date: 7/11/2016 Revision No. 0 Page 2 of 2

3.0 Plan for Resolution or Corrective Action

In order to evaluate the effect of issuing the TBD on all previously completed claims, a 

search was conducted for all completed claims with verified employment at Seymour that 

had a probability of causation (POC) of less than 50%. This search identified 8 claims. 

Two of these claims had been completed using revision 1 of the Appendix and were 

removed from further evaluation. One other also had employment at another site and 

changes to the Seymour Appendix were evaluated under a recent PER for that site.

A new dose estimate was performed for the remaining 5 claims using the Appendix, as 

well as all other applicable approved dose reconstruction methods. The resulting 

probability of causation (POC) was below 45% for all 5 claims. 

NIOSH will provide the Department of Labor with the list of all claims evaluated under 

this PER. Since none would now result in a POC greater than 50%, NOSH will not 

request the return of any of the claims.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The following certification accompanies the issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not filed, as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8238, 34-47986 dated June 5, 2003.

In connection with the Annual Report of Harbor Florida Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Brown, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and                    |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

| /s/                     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
| Michael J. Brown, Sr.   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| December 14, 2005       |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., Thursday, January 10, 2008.

# PLACE:

1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

# STATUS:

Open.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary, (202) 220-2376;                         *ehall@nw.org.*

# AGENDA:

 

I. Call To Order.

II. Approval of the Minutes.

III. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee.

IV. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.

V. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.

VI. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee.

VII. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee.

VIII. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee.

IX. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.

X. Financial Report.

XI. Corporate Socrecard.

XII. Chief Executive Officer's Quarterly Management Report.

XIII. Appropriations Update.

XIV. Additional Appropriations—Mortgage Foreclosure Mitigation.

XV. Field Operations Presentation.

XVI. Adjournment.

Erica Hall,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 08-73 Filed 1-8-08; 11:56 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-M
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5

TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50607

Summary Calendar

KATHRYN C. TILLMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(A-97-CV-125-JN)

December 10, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kathryn Tillman appeals an adverse summary judgment in her Americans with

Disabilities Act action against the Texas Department of Insurance. For the reasons

assigned, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Tillman claims thatshe suffersfrommultiple chemicalsensitivity (“MCS”), that

the Department failed reasonably to accommodate her disability, and that her MCS
 

1

 International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257 (5th Cir. 1991).

 

2 Dorsett v. Board of Trustees of State Colleges & Univs., 940 F.2d 121 (5th Cir.

1991).

 

3

 Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986).

2

caused extreme allergic reactions whenever she was around fragrances or perfumes in

the workplace. 

The magistrate judge recommended, and the district court agreed, thatsummary

judgment should be granted in favor of the Department, finding that Tillman was not

a “qualified individualwith a disability” because, although she was substantially limited

in major life activities as a result of MCS,she could not perform the essential functions

of her job. 

The magistrate judge also found that the Department provided many

accommodations,such as a flexible work schedule, ventilators, a leave of absence, and

directing employees to not wear perfumes in Tillman’s work area. The court held that

allowing her to work at home would not be a reasonable accommodation. She timely

appealed.

ANALYSIS

On appeal of a summary judgment our review of the record is plenary1 and we

apply the same standard as that used by the district court.2 We view the evidence in

the light most favorable to the non-movant and if we find no genuine dispute of a

material fact, deem summary judgment appropriate.3

We need not decide whether Tillman’s multiple chemical sensitivity is a

disability under the ADA. Assuming, arguendo, that she is a qualified individual with
3

a disability, we agree with the district court that the Department has reasonably

accommodated her and that her request to work at home would not be a reasonable

accommodation. Our review of the record, briefs, and relevant authorities discloses

no reversible error and the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.