alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 24, 2007

s0117 

# Order

January 24, 2007

132265

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132265 COA: 266652 Wayne CC: 05-004855-01 XAVIER REMBERT SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Nuveen Exchange-Traded Funds

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of each of the Nuveen Exchange-Traded Funds listed in Exhibit
A attached hereto (the "Funds") for the year ended September
30, 2000, we considered its internal control, including control
activities for safeguarding securities, to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form N-SAR, and not to provide assurance on internal control.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing
and maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess
the expected benefits and related costs of internal control.
Generally, internal controls that are relevant to an audit pertain
to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements for
external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.  Those internal
controls include the safeguarding of assets against unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition.


Because of inherent limitations in any internal control,
misstatements due to errors or fraud may occur and not be
detected.  Also, projections of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods are subject to the risk that internal control may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is
a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the specific internal control components does not reduce to a
relatively low level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that
would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving internal
control, including control activities for safeguarding securities,
and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses as
defined above as of September 30, 2000.


This report is intended solely for the information and use of the
Board of Directors and management of the Nuveen Exchange-
Traded Funds and the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other
than these specified parties.


/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
November 17, 2000

Exhibit A


Funds with September Fiscal Year End

Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund, Inc.
Nuveen New York Performance Plus Municipal Fund, Inc.
Nuveen New York Investment Quality Municipal Fund,
Inc.
Nuveen New York Select Quality Municipal Fund, Inc.
Nuveen New York Quality Income Municipal Fund, Inc.
Nuveen Insured New York Premium Income Municipal
Fund, Inc.
Nuveen New York Dividend Advantage Municipal Fund
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              111,539
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        50,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (5,693)
<INVENTORY>                                          51,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    216,192
<PP&E>                                               69,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (30,219)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      269,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               119,399
<BONDS>                                             234,422
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                          (95,219)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        269,276
<SALES>                                             209,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    209,931
<CGS>                                               136,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       136,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       7,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                          7,665
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AUSTIN SCOTT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 466 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5848 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide travel to Dover Air Force 

Base for family members of members of the Armed Forces who die 

outside of the United States but not in a theater of combat operations 

so the family may receive the remains of the deceased. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2018 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois (for himself, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. HARRIS, and Mr. O’ROURKE) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide travel to Dover 

Air Force Base for family members of members of the 

Armed Forces who die outside of the United States but 

not in a theater of combat operations so the family 

may receive the remains of the deceased. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Heroes Family 

5 Travel Act of 2018’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5848 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION OF REMAINS OF CASUALTIES; 

2 TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR NEXT OF KIN. 

3 (a) TRANSPORTATION FOR REMAINS OF A MEMBER

4 WHO DIES NOT IN A THEATER OF COMBAT OPER5 ATIONS.—Section 562 of the John Warner National De6 fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 

7 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 1482 note) is amended— 

8 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘DYING IN A

9 THEATER OF COMBAT OPERATIONS’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘in a combat 

11 theater of operations’’ and inserting ‘‘outside of the 

12 United States’’. 

13 (b) TRANSPORTATION FOR FAMILY.—The Secretary 

14 of Defense shall revise Department of Defense Instruction 

15 1300.18 to extend travel privileges via Invitational Travel 

16 Authorization to family members of members of the 

17 Armed Forces who die outside of the United States and 

18 whose remains are returned to the United States through 

19 the mortuary facility at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement ofFactory Card & Party Outlet Corp. 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan and 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Factory Card & Party OutletCorp. for the 43 weeks ended February 1, 2003 (Successor Company Operations) and the nine weeks ended April 6, 2002 (Predecessor Company Operations). 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touch LLP 

April 22, 2003

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. Employment Agreements, Restricted Stock Agreements and Warrant Agreements on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2003, appearing in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. for the 43 weeks ended February 1, 2003 (Successor Company Operations) and the nine weeks ended April 6, 2002 (Predecessor Company Operations). 

 

/s/    Deloitte &Touche LLP 

April 22, 2003
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,166-01

IN RE RICHARD LOPEZ, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 09-04380-CRF-361-A IN THE 361ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM BRAZOS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. Relator filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

the 361st District Court of Brazos County on January 22, 2014. More than 180 days has passed since

the filing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). 

Respondent, the District Clerk of Brazos County, is ordered to file a response, which may

be made by submitting the record on such habeas corpus application, submitting proof of the date

of receipt by the State showing 180 days has not yet elapsed, or stating that Relator has not filed an

application for a writ of habeas corpus in Brazos County. This application for leave to file a writ of
2

mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such

response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: June 29, 2016

Do not publish
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00218

Rachel Leiton, Director

Division of Energy Employees Occupational

 Illness Compensation

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321

Washington, District of Columbia 20210

Dear Ms. Leiton:

National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

1090 Tusculum Ave.

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938

Phone: 513-533-6825

Fax: 513-533-6826

October 27, 2014

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the General Atomics facility in La Jolla, CA, as an addition to the Special 

Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program

Act of 2000. On September 25, 2014, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. §7384q(b), the Secretary of 

HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

“All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked for General Atomics at its facility in La Jolla, 

California, during the period from January 1, 1960, through December 31, 1969, for a number 

of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this 

employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or 

more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort."

This designation became effective on October 25, 2014, as provided for under 42 U.S.C.

§7384l(14)(C). Therefore, beginning on October 25, 2014, members of this class of employees, 

defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

Sincerely,

[Signature on File]

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
### The HONORABLE CHARLES A. SHAW, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-1576

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. James Ward, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 28, 1995 Filed: December 11, 1995

___________ Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

James Ward pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and posses s with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. The district court sentenced him to seventy months i n prison and 1 four years supervised release. On appeal, Ward argues the district court erred in assessing an enhancement for possessing a firearm, and in denying
a minor-participant role reduction. See U.S.S.G. §§ 2D1.1(b)(1); 3B1.2(b)
. We affirm.

The district court's findings that a defendant warrants a firear m posses sion enhancement and is not entitled to a "minor participant " reduction will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous. See United State s v. Rich mond , 37 F.3d 418, 419 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct
. 1163 (1995); United States v.

### -2-

Rayner , 2 F.3d 286, 288 (8th Cir. 1993). The government must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant warrants a firear m enhancement, which is assessed if "it is not clearly improbable that the weapon had a nexus with [drug trafficking] activity." Richmond , 37 F.3d at 419. Defendant must prove he is entitled to a reduction for mino r participant role in the offense. After car efully reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court' s findings are not clearly erroneous. Police found numerou s firearms, heroin, and drug paraphernalia in the upstairs portion of a hous e in St. Lou is that Ward shared with a more culpable conspirator, whic h justified the finding of a nexus between the fir earms and the illegal drug activities of both conspirators. Compare Richmo nd , 37 F.3d at 420; United States v. Williams , 1 0 F.3d 590, 595-96 (8th Cir. 1993); United States v. Hammer , 3 F.3d 266, 270 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 112 1 (1994); United States v. Turpin , 920 F.2d 1377, 1386 (8th Cir. 1990), cert . denied , 499 U.S. 953 (1991). In addition to receiving packages of heroin from California and delivering them to his more culpable conspirator, Ward assisted in local dis tribution of the heroin, which justified denying the § 3B1.2(b) reduction. Compare United States v. Abanatha , 999 F.2d 1246, 1250 (8th Cir. 1993), cert denied , 114 S. Ct. 1549 (1994). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 10.43

LOGO

November 16, 2009

Lynn Greenstein

Lynn,

Congratulations on your new position as President, Nationwide Bank, reporting to me. I am looking forward to working with you in this new capacity.

Details of your new role and compensation package are outlined below.

Executive Grade

You will remain a grade 12 Senior Vice President.

Base Salary

Your annual base salary will
remain at $294,200.

Annual Incentive

You will continue to participate in Performance Incentive Plan (PIP) at your current target rate of 60%, based on a combination of business unit and individual performance.

Long-Term Incentive

You will retain 2009 long-term incentive (LTI) award at a target of
$263,200. All long-term awards are reviewed annually and you will receive a new award in 2010.

All executive grades and variable rewards
plans are subject to approval by the Board of Directors and are reviewed on an annual basis.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions.

Larry Hilsheimer

President and COO, Direct and Customer Solutions



|                    |  |  |  |       
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------
|/s/ Lynn Greenstein |  |  |  |       
|Lynn Greenstein     |  |  |  | (Date)



|CC: | Nick Muntean, VP Human Resources
|--- | --------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6042 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6042

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to delay the reduction in 
   Federal medical assistance percentage for Medicaid personal care 
services furnished without an electronic visit verification system, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2018

 Mr. Guthrie introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to delay the reduction in 
   Federal medical assistance percentage for Medicaid personal care 
services furnished without an electronic visit verification system, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELAY IN REDUCTION OF FMAP FOR MEDICAID PERSONAL CARE 
              SERVICES FURNISHED WITHOUT AN ELECTRONIC VISIT 
              VERIFICATION SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1903(l) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396b(l)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``January 1, 2019'' and inserting 
                ``January 1, 2020''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``2019 
                and''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A)(i), by striking ``calendar quarters 
        in 2019'' and inserting ``calendar quarters in 2020''.
    (b) Definition of Personal Care Services.--Section 1903(l)(5)(C) of 
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(l)(5)(C)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The term `personal care services' means'' 
        and inserting the following: ``The term `personal care 
        services'--
                    ``(i) means'';
            (2) by striking the period and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(ii) does not include personal care services--
                            ``(I) provided to individuals who are 
                        inpatients or residents of a hospital, a 
                        nursing facility, an intermediate care facility 
                        for individuals with intellectual disabilities, 
                        or an institution for mental diseases; or
                            ``(II) provided in congregate residential 
                        programs such as group homes, assisted living 
                        facilities, or other congregate residential 
                        settings in which 24-hour service is 
                        available.''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATIONS  I, Jay Lutsky, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tiger Acquisitions, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: (a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)         designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements, for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d)         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: August 14, 2008 /s/ Jay LutskyJay Lutsky, Chief Executive Officer
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jeffrey Monk, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00051

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17

- F

0013

- 102 ). Opinion delivered by C hief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Jeffrey Monk, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 12, 2018 BY O RDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk