alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6037 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal certain rules related 

to the determination of unrelated business taxable income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2018 

Mr. CONAWAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

certain rules related to the determination of unrelated 

business taxable income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nonprofits Support 

5 Act’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6037 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT THAT UNRELATED BUSI2 NESS TAXABLE INCOME BE COMPUTED SEPA3 RATELY FOR EACH TRADE OR BUSINESS AC4 TIVITY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 512(a) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph 

7 (6). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

10 13702 of Public Law 115–97. 

11 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF INCREASE OF UNRELATED BUSINESS 

12 TAXABLE INCOME BY CERTAIN DISALLOWED 

13 FRINGE BENEFITS. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 512(a) of the Internal 

15 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph 

16 (7). 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

19 13703 of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dov Frumovich, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Eltek Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  July 14, 2003


/S/ DOV FRUMOVICH *
___________________
Dov Frumovich
Chief Financial Officer


* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

# Date:

March 5, 2008.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Machine Technology, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 1994.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Magnum Sports & Entertainment, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2002.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Management of Environmental Solutions & Technology Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Mariculture Systems, Inc. because it has not filed any period reports since it filed a Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on March 5, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 18, 2008.

By the Commission.

Nancy M. Morris,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 08-987 Filed 3-05-08; 9:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00068-CV

DOUGLAS GREENE, Appellant

V.

DISCOVER BANK, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at 

Law No. 3

of Tarrant County (2019-009601-3)

March 4, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. We reverse the trial court’s denial of 

arbitration, and we order the trial judge to compel arbitration and stay trial in 

accordance with Section 171.025 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

It is further ordered that Discover Bank shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, 

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
Exhibit 10.23

 

LETTER OF RESIGNATION

 

December 7, 2015

 

Board of Directors

ASN Technologies, Inc.

210291 South 1300 East, #118

Sandy, UT 84094

 

Dear Board of Directors and Secretary,

 

Effective as of the Effective Time and contingent upon the consummation of the Merger, I hereby resign as a member of the board of directors of ASN Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”).

 

I hereby acknowledge and confirm that I have no claim or right of action of any kind for compensation or otherwise against the Company or any of its officers or employees in respect of the termination of my office or otherwise. To the extent that any such claim or right of action exists or may exist, I irrevocably waive such claim or right of action and release and forever discharge the Company, its officers and employees from all and any liability in respect thereof.

 

Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of December 4, 2015, by and among Parent, SMSI Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, and Senseonics, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

	
/s/ Daniel Davis
    	
 
    
	
Daniel Davis
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 46 (Friday, March 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12375-12376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application for Duty-Free Entry of a Scientific Instrument

    Pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

[[Page 12376]]

L. 89-651; as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 
301), we invite comments on the question of whether an instrument of 
equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instrument 
shown below is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United 
States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import 
Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 
Ave., NW., Room 2104, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be 
examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 2104, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.
    Docket Number: 08-003. Applicant: Rice University, 6100 Main 
Street, Houston, TX 77005. Instrument: Variable Temperature High 
Magnetic Field Nanometer-Precision Probe Station. Manufacturer: 
Attocube Systems AG, Germany.
    Intended Use: The instrument is intended to be used to allow 
multiterminal electronic measurement of novel materials, particularly 
those difficult to wire up in traditional geometries. This instrument 
will enable additional analytical physics and chemistry research 
involving nanomaterials. This instrument can supply a cryostate and 
magnet system with four independently nanopositionable probes. This 
variable temperature probe system is unique and is essential to enable 
a variety of physics and chemistry research efforts involving 
nanomaterials. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: January 
31, 2008.

    Dated: March 3, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 08-984 Filed 3-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,
Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices 

# Order

April 6, 2018

156116

YVETTE M. CORMIER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 15 6116 COA: 331286 Midland CC: 15-002463-NZ PF FITNESS-MIDLAND, LLC, and PLA-FIT FRANCHISE, LLC, Defendants-Appellees,

and

PLANET FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC, PLANET FITNESS EQUIPMENT, LLC, PLANET FITNESS NAF , LLC, PFIP, LLC, and TSG CONSUMER PARTNERS, LLC, Defendants.

___________________ __________________/

On order of the Court, the app lication for leave to appeal the June 1, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Co urt of Appeals judgment concluding that the plaintiff ha d abandoned her claims under th e Michigan Consumer Protection Act (MCPA), MCL 445.901 et seq . The plaintiff attached her complaint to her brief, cited the governing statute, MCL 445.901 et seq ., and provided a two-page discussion of her theory supporting her claims. Thus, the plai ntiff did not simply announce her position and leave it to the court to rationalize her basis, nor did she require the court to search for authority either to sustain or reject h er position in this statutory
cause of action. Cf. Wilson v Taylor , 457 Mich 232, 243 (1998), quoting Mitcham v

Detroit , 355 Mich 182, 203 (1959). Acc ordingly, the Court of Appeals erred in declining to consider the plaintiff’s MCPA claims. Therefore, we REMAND this case to that court for consideration of the trial court’s grant of summary disposi tion on those claims. See Brownlow v McCall Enterprises

, Inc , 315 Mich App 103 (2016).I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

April 6, 2018

a0403 2

Clerk In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we a re not persuaded that the remaining questions pre sented should be reviewed by th is Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 31(a) - RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION (CEO)

I, Jackson Y. Dott, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Monarch Services,
    Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
        supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
        registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
        to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
        period in which this report is being prepared;

    b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
        the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
        and

    c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
        most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
        reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors, (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 17, 2005

/s/    JACKSON Y. DOTT
----------------------
Jackson Y. Dott
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6090

JAMES H. MCBRIDE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:09-cv-00716-JRS)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. McBride, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James H. McBride appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to appoint McBride new counsel in a criminal 

case pending in state court. The district court abstained from 

deciding the case, pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 

(1971).*

AFFIRMED

 The Younger doctrine “permits federal courts to refrain 

from hearing cases that would interfere with a pending state 

criminal proceeding.” Martin v. Stewart, 499 F.3d 360, 363 

(4th Cir. 2007). We review for abuse of discretion a district 

court’s decision to abstain under Younger, Laurel Sand & Gravel, 

Inc. v. Wilson, 519 F.3d 156, 161 (4th Cir. 2008), and find no 

abuse of discretion here. Accordingly, we affirm the decision 

of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

 * Although McBride did not file timely objections to the 

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, he did pursue the 

alternate option suggested by the magistrate judge of filing an 

amended complaint. Thus, McBride’s failure to file objections 

did not result in a waiver of his right to appellate review. 

cf. United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 

2007) (holding a party waives appellate review by failing to 

file timely and specific objections to a magistrate judge’s 

report).
CSC
LEASING COMPANY


 


Lease
Proposal For


BTCS
Inc.


 


Equipment:


 


CSC
Leasing Company (“Lessor”) will lease to BTCS Inc. (“Lessee”), the Equipment with an estimated
total purchase price of $325,000.00. Lessor will purchase the Equipment from the vendor(s) and lease the Equipment
to Lessee under an operating lease based on the following proposed terms:


 


Basic
Rate and Term:


 


The
Basic Monthly Lease Rates shall be as follows:


 


$11,267.00 per month for a 36 month lease term.


 


Security
Deposit:


 


Lessee
shall pay to Lessor 2 advanced
payments as a security deposit for the Lease Schedule, which is not offset against the monthly l ease payments during the lease
term. The Security Deposit is subject to forfeiture should Lessee default on any of its payment obligations as specified in the
Master Equipment Lease Agreement.


 


Other
Terms:


 


	 	●	This
    Lease Proposal is subject to favorable financial review.
	 	 	 
	 	●	An
    ACH draft account is required for the monthly lease payments unless otherwise waived by the Lessor.
	 	 	 
	 	●	Lessor’s
    Master Lease Agreement and the related Lease Schedule shall set forth the governing terms and conditions of the proposed
    operating l ease.


 


Upgrades,
Renewal, and Termination:


 


The
Lessee may upgrade and add new or used equipment to the Lease Schedule at any time during the Lease Term. At the end of the
Lease Term, the Lessee may terminate the Lease Schedule with no further obligation per the terms and conditions of the Master
Equipment Lease Agreement; renew the Lease Schedule (“Extension”) for a Lease Term and Monthly Lease Rate mutually
agreed; or purchase (“Buyout”) the Equipment at the then fair market value.


 


Lessee
Responsibilities:


 


The
Lessee is responsible for all applicable taxes, maintenance, installation, and de-installation costs; cost of transportation
and insurance of Equipment in transit from the vendor to the shipping destination, (FOB Origin); and UCC filing fees of $5.00
per month for the executed Lease Schedule.


 


Proposal
Expiration:


 


This
proposal expires on 12/21/2015 12:00:00 AM unless accepted in writing prior to that time, or extended in writing
by the Lessor.


 


	Accepted
    by and Agreed to by:	/s/ Charles Allen
    
	 	BTCS
    Inc., Authorized Signature
	 	 
	 	Charles
    Allen, ECO
	 	Printed
    Name & Title of Authorized Signor


 


Submitted
by Jonathan Price on December 14, 2015.


 


Financial
Services For Today’s Technologies


6806
Paragon Place, Suite 170 Richmond, Virginia 23230


Phone:
804-673-1000 FAX: 804-673-7501
Exhibit 15


Acknowledgment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of L3Harris Technologies, Inc.





We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 2024 Equity Incentive Plan of our reports dated April 26, 2024, relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 26, 2024.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP








Orlando, Florida


May 1, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of H&H Imports, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2011

| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                      
| |                                                      
| | /s/ STEVEN ROGAI                                     
| | Steven Rogai                                         
| | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)