alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARUN-EX 10.65-2014.7.31




Exhibit 10.65


CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Amendment #4
to SYNNEX Corporation
Aruba Distributor Agreement
This Amendment #4 to the Aruba Distributor Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the date of last signature below (“Effective Date”) by and between Aruba Networks, Inc., having its principal place of business at 1344 Crossman Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 (“Aruba”), and SYNNEX Corporation, with an address at 44201 Nobel Drive, Fremont, CA 94538 (“Distributor”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, Aruba and Distributor entered into a Distributor Agreement dated September 29, 2011 (the “Agreement”), as later amended; and
WHEREAS, Aruba and Distributor now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
A.    Section 5.2(B) is hereby removed in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“Rebate for Non Standard Pricing (NSP).  [* * *] and (iii) Aruba receives written notice from Distributor of Distributor’s rebate request for any such additional discount by 5:00 p.m. Pacific time on the second business day of the month following the month in which the Products subject to such additional discount were sold (“Final POS Date”).  Distributor acknowledges and agrees that Aruba will have no obligation to provide any rebate if such written notice is not received by Aruba by the Final POS Date.  For the purposes of this Section, all rebate request notices must be sent to dl-aruba-pos@arubanetworks.com.”
B.    This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
C.    Except as provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective authorized representatives as of the Effective Date.
ARUBA NEWORKS, INC.        SYNNEX CORPORATION
By:     /s/ Joshua Cash        By:     /s/ Cheryl Grant    
Print Name: Joshua Cash        Print Name: Cheryl Grant    
Title: Director, Commercial Counsel        Title: Staff Counsel    
Date: 8/25/2014        Date: 8/21/2014    

*** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Millstream Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned acting principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  February 18, 2011   /s/ Denny W. Nestripke Denny W. Nestripke, Director (Acting Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### General Services Administration

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [OMB Control No. 9000-0166; Docket 2010-0083; Sequence 18]

# AGENCIES:

Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The notice, OMB Control No. 9000-0166, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act—One-time Reporting Requirements for Prime Contractors published in the                         **Federal Register**                         is being withdrawn and no longer is accepting comments.                    

# DATES:

April 30, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Ernest Woodson, Procurement Analyst, Contract Policy Branch, at telephone (202) 501-3775 or via e-mail to                         *ernest.woodson@gsa.gov.*                         Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-0166, withdrawal.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## A. Background

                    The Notice, published in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 75 FR 17919, on April 8, 2010, requesting comments regarding an extension to an existing OMB clearance (9000-0166) is being withdrawn. The notice is being withdrawn because it is associated with a second interim rule which is still in process, and has not been published. Comments are no longer being sought.                

Dated: April 26, 2010.

Al Matera,

Director, Acquisition Policy Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-10069 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6029 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6029

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
reauthorize the comprehensive opioid abuse grant program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2018

 Mr. Rothfus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
reauthorize the comprehensive opioid abuse grant program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reauthorizing and Extending Grants 
for Recovery from Opioid Use Programs Act of 2018'' or the ``REGROUP 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE OPIOID ABUSE GRANT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1001(a)(27) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 
Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10261(a)(27)) is amended by striking ``through 
2021'' and inserting ``and 2018, and $330,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2019 through 2023''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESIA YAMILETH BERMUDEZMENDOZA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-70218

Agency No. A096-216-479

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Cesia Yamileth Bermudez-Mendoza, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her motion to

FILED

MAY 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for

review.

In her opening brief, Bermudez-Mendoza fails to address, and therefore has

waived, any challenge to the BIA’s determination that the IJ lacked jurisdiction to

reopen her proceedings. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir.

2011) (issues not raised in the opening brief may be deemed waived). Because the

issue of the IJ’s jurisdiction is dispositive, we need not reach the contentions

Bermudez-Mendoza raises in her opening brief regarding eligibility for asylum.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 10-70218
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα L 124/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0669 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | L 124 |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Νομοθεσία | 59ό έτος13 Μαΐου 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0669

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

L 124

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Νομοθεσία

59ό έτος13 Μαΐου 2016

---

| Περιεχόμενα | | II   Μη νομοθετικές πράξεις | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ΔΙΟΡΓΑΝΙΚΕΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ |
| | * | Δήλωση του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και της Επιτροπής με την ευκαιρία της έγκρισης της διοργανικής συμφωνίας για τη βελτίωση του νομοθετικού έργου της 13ης Απριλίου 2016 | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

II   Μη νομοθετικές πράξεις

Σελίδα

ΔΙΟΡΓΑΝΙΚΕΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ

*

Δήλωση του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και της Επιτροπής με την ευκαιρία της έγκρισης της διοργανικής συμφωνίας για τη βελτίωση του νομοθετικού έργου της 13ης Απριλίου 2016

1

| EL | Οι πράξεις των οποίων οι τίτλοι έχουν τυπωθεί με λευκά στοιχεία αποτελούν πράξεις τρεχούσης διαχειρίσεως που έχουν θεσπισθεί στο πλαίσιο της γεωργικής πολιτικής και είναι γενικά περιορισμένης χρονικής ισχύος.
  Οι τίτλοι όλων των υπολοίπων πράξεων έχουν τυπωθεί με μαύρα στοιχεία και επισημαίνονται με αστερίσκο. |
| --- | --- |

EL

Οι πράξεις των οποίων οι τίτλοι έχουν τυπωθεί με λευκά στοιχεία αποτελούν πράξεις τρεχούσης διαχειρίσεως που έχουν θεσπισθεί στο πλαίσιο της γεωργικής πολιτικής και είναι γενικά περιορισμένης χρονικής ισχύος.

Οι τίτλοι όλων των υπολοίπων πράξεων έχουν τυπωθεί με μαύρα στοιχεία και επισημαίνονται με αστερίσκο.

---

II Μη νομοθετικές πράξεις

ΔΙΟΡΓΑΝΙΚΕΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ

| 13.5.2016 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | L 124/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2016

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

L 124/1

---

ΔΗΛΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΟΫ ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΙΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΕΥΚΑΙΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΓΚΡΙΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΟΡΓΑΝΙΚΗΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΑΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗ ΒΕΛΤΙΩΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΘΕΤΙΚΟΫ ΕΡΓΟΥ ΤΗΣ 13ΗΣ ΑΠΡΙΛΙΟΥ 2016

Το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο και η Επιτροπή εκτιμούν ότι η συμφωνία (1) αντικατοπτρίζει την ισορροπία μεταξύ του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου, του Συμβουλίου και της Επιτροπής και των αντίστοιχων αρμοδιοτήτων τους, όπως ορίζονται στις Συνθήκες.

1

Δεν θίγει τη συμφωνία-πλαίσιο της 20ής Οκτωβρίου 2010 για τις σχέσεις μεταξύ του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής (2).

2

---

(1)  
  ΕΕ L 123 της 12.5.2016, σ. 1.

1

(2)  
  ΕΕ L 304 της 20.11.2010, σ. 47.

2

---
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Universal Solar Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lijie
Zhu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
November15, 2010





/s/
      Lijie ZhuLijie
      Zhu
                  Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001029534
<NAME> HEI PREFERRED FUNDING, LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                   121,336
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,274
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               61
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    103,093
<COMMON>                                        18,193
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,347
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,123
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,123
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,123
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 37 (Monday, February 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 10066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-804]



[[Page 10066]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 8, 2008, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Advantech, 
Shing-Tien City, Taipei, Taiwan; United Electronic Industries, Inc., 
Walpole, MA; ELMA Electronic Inc., Fremont, CA; Corelis, Cerritos, CA; 
Advanced Integration LLC, Columbus, OH; Mindready Solutions, Inc., 
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada; Digalog Systems, Inc., New Berlin, WI; 
PLDA, Inc., Aix-en--Provence Cedex, France; and Signametrics, Seattle, 
WA have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 29, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on December 20, 2007 (72 FR 72388).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 08-804 Filed 2-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Sonus Corp.:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the Registration  Statement on Form
S-8 No.  333-57673 and the  Registration  Statement on Form S-3 No. 333-23137 of
Sonus Corp. of our report dated October 23, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated
balance sheets of Sonus Corp. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year  period  ended July 31, 1998,  which
report  appears in the July 31,  1998  annual  report on Form  10-KSB/A of Sonus
Corp.


                              /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Portland, Oregon
November 5, 1998
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

**Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code****, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of ARC EnergyTrust (“ARC”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Steven W. Sinclair, Vice-President, Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer of ARC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ARC.

 

 
| signed *“Steven W.  Sinclair”* |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|

 

Name:  Steven W.SinclairTitle:  Senior Vice-President, Financeand Chief Financial Officer

 

March 25, 2008

 

----
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

699 

CA 14-01006 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

ELISABETH R. VURAL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MATTHEW OZHAN VURAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FINOCCHIO & ENGLISH, SYRACUSE, D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS. (JOHN A.

CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

ALDERMAN AND ALDERMAN, SYRACUSE (EDWARD B. ALDERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County

(Kevin G. Young, J.), entered August 27, 2013 in a divorce action. 

The judgment, among other things, distributed the marital assets and

awarded plaintiff child support. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant husband appeals from a judgment of divorce

that, inter alia, directed him to pay child support and distributed

marital assets and debts. We reject defendant’s contention that

Supreme Court erred in its valuation of the marital residence. The

court’s valuation was “ ‘within the range of expert testimony and

adequately supported by the record’ ” (Johnson v Johnson, 277 AD2d

923, 925, lv dismissed 96 NY2d 792). The court also properly credited

plaintiff with her contribution of separate property for the down

payment on the marital residence (see Pelcher v Czebatol, 98 AD3d

1258, 1259). With respect to the distribution of the remaining

marital assets and debts, we conclude that the court did not abuse its

“ ‘substantial discretion in determining what distribution of property

[—including debt—] will be equitable under all the circumstances’ ”

(Oliver v Oliver, 70 AD3d 1428, 1429). 

Contrary to defendant’s contentions, the court did not abuse its

discretion in awarding child support to plaintiff or in calculating

the amount of that award. The court acknowledged that, given the

roughly equal incomes of the parties and their shared custody

arrangement, no award of child support would typically be appropriate

(see generally Leonard v Leonard, 109 AD3d 126, 128). After

considering the parties’ respective financial resources, however,

including defendant’s inheritance, the court properly awarded child

support to plaintiff (see Matter of Cody v Evans-Cody, 291 AD2d 27,
-2- 699 

CA 14-01006 

30-31; see also Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [e] [4]). Finally,

after applying the statutory guidelines to calculate the basic child

support obligation, the court considered the relevant statutory

factors and properly determined that application of the basic

obligation would be unjust or inappropriate (see Matter of Dutchess

County Dept. of Social Servs. v Day, 96 NY2d 149, 155-156). 

Entered: July 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ERINASHA JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2022-3045

May 8, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Susan St. John, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.