alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5772 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 167
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5772

                          [Report No. 115-819]

  To designate the J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Courthouse in 
Amarillo, Texas, as the ``J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou 
                  Robinson United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2018

Mr. Thornberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 16, 2018

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Courthouse in 
Amarillo, Texas, as the ``J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou 
                  Robinson United States Courthouse''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Courthouse located at 205 
SE 5th Ave., Amarillo, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``J. 
Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou Robinson United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou Robinson United 
States Courthouse''.
                                                 House Calendar No. 167

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5772

                          [Report No. 115-819]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Courthouse in 
Amarillo, Texas, as the ``J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou 
                  Robinson United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 16, 2018

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
mugs

NOU-21-2006 10:25 = Senator Bareck Dama 2822285417 Pai ap
BARALA Lomnns } I MENT.
OE { I ENVIRONMENT AND.
i PUBLIC WORKS

I FOREIGN RELATIG
Wnited States Sent serena anne
WASHINGTON, OC 20510

November 2 1 2096 |
|

The Honorable Elizabeth Cibby) White |
Director of Health Services |
Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW | j
Washington, DC. 20585 .

Dear Ms. White: |

documentation related to the relationship between thg formerDow Chemica! Piant
located in Madison, IL. (subsequently owned or dperated Conalco, Phelps Dodge
and Spectrulite Consortium, Inc), the Atomic Energy/Commitsion (AEC), and the Rocky
Flats Nuclear Weapons Production (RENWP) facility neor Denver Colorsin

Tam writing to ask your cooperation and wale i obtaining any and al]

Thave been Working with Senator Durbin Congretsmen Costello and
Shimkus for almost two years to help thousands of Ilinois regidents who were injured
working in our government's suclear weapons progrim duri the Cold War, Although
‘we have obtained documentation supporting the workers co: tion claim, our records
are incomplete, as there are documents still held by the Dep: t of Energy (OE) that
are relevant to the case. H

> 4

We request a copy of the contract between Rely Flats/AEC and the Dow

Chemical Madison, IL sito (MIS), or any of its sub: lequent Gwners. In addition, we
request any and all documents welating to: j i

1) Licenses issued by AECDOE p itting iu anWor thorium processing
at Dow Chemical, of any of it's subsequent owner:

2) Agreements between AEC/DOE and the above-listed companies related to
uranium and/or thorium Processing at these facilities;

3) Uranium and/or thorium contamication inl general'at the Dow Chemical
~ "Madison, IL site; !

4) Uranium and/or thorium remediation in loca atithe Dow Chemical
Madison, IL site: '

i
5) Beryllium at the Dow Chemical Madison, |IL site, pr its subsequent sites,

6) Personnel of the AEC or the RENWP working in way at the Dow
Chemical Madison, IL site; |

vom oe mca mae teem | amnomer
Nanary toe Boe eaone Bas teen Senne [vet norm court Sraer inves

sere et
erin ioe ae por wetine

ge cates cnc Bas en onetmihene, onesies,
Tans tee, ssa Sia aoe

comes cat
Eee Ustanacnte Few O70" a8 ase,


NOV-21-2886 10:25 Senator Barack Shama 2022268417 > azven
Loy
jot
7) AEC inspections of DMIS, including any dnd all resorts regarding said
inspections;
8) AEC ownership or other Proprietary intr in DMIS building, land or _
equipment;
9) DOE assigning DMIS as an AWE/DOE EEOICP. site in 2001 and 2002; and

10) DOE ownership or licensing agreements regarding'the burial and/or storage of
magnesium-thorium shudge on any portionjof the GMIS facility,

Please contact Robert Stephan (618-946-183 6) or Michgel Robertson (202-228-
5566) on my staff with any questions. Thank you,
Sincerely,

|

United States Sq tor |

TOTAL P.@2


Name list

The Honorable Barack Obama
United States Senate
WDC 20510

Down Chemical Plant

Madison, IL

Conalco

Phelps Dodge

Spectrulite Consortium, inc

Atomic Energy Commission

Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Production
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00214

- CV

IN RE Juan Miguel MATA

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORD ER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On April 10, 2015

, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered relator’s petition and is of the opin ion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on April 21, 2015

.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have h ereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of April, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2714, styled In the Matter of Maria Elena Mata and Juan Miguel Mata

, pending in the County Court of Dimmit County, Texas, the Honorable Francisco G. Ponce presiding.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC,
Appellant

v.

NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA

TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., NANYA

TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION DELAWARE,
Appellees

______________________

2022

- 2141

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021

- 00172

.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consider ation of the appell ant ’ s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the above

- captioned appeal,

I T IS ORDER ED TH AT:

(1) The motion is gra nted. The appeal is dismissed. Case: 22-2141 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 01/27/2023M ONTEREY R ESEARCH

, LLC V

. N ANYA T ECHNOLOGY
C ORPORATION 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

January 27, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 27, 2023 Case: 22-2141 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 01/27/2023
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code), Michael J. Barrist, Chief Executive Officer of NCOGroup, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to theAnnual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2009 (the “Report”) that:

 
| (1)    | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Date:  | March 31,  2010     |   | /s/  Michael J. Barrist |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael  J. Barrist      |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Judy A. Schmeling, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge: 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 of HSN, Inc. (the“Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof HSN, Inc. 

Dated: November 3, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,155,795               7,595,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,664,604              13,060,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,227                 185,717
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,476,811              21,346,235
<PP&E>                                      10,422,220               8,912,062
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,379,238               3,693,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,750,231              50,540,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,053,911              17,150,447
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        67,078                  65,432
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,862,412              19,620,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,750,231              50,540,019
<SALES>                                     71,901,931              59,653,278
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,901,931              59,653,278
<CGS>                                       38,113,459              29,755,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               64,484,317              51,364,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                  75,503
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,530,287               1,794,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,030,005               6,579,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,624,551               2,768,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,405,454               3,810,888
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,405,454               3,810,888
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .52                     .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51                     .58


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50304

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD THOMAS GARY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC Nos. A-93-CR-161 and A-97-CR-137 

--------------------

April 13, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Thomas Gary (“Gary”) has appealed the district

court’s judgment sentencing him following: (1) the revocation of

the supervised release term imposed for his conviction for making

a false statement to influence the action of a bank and (2) his

guilty-plea conviction for theft of mail. 

Because Gary’s brief fails to assert an argument challenging

the sentence imposed following the revocation of the supervised 
No. 99-50304 

-2-

release term in his false statement case, Gary’s appeal of that

sentence has been abandoned. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A);

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). 

With regard to his sentence for theft of mail, Gary asserts

that the district court failed to adequately explain its reasons

for upwardly departing from the applicable sentencing guideline

range and that the extent of the upward departure was

unreasonable. A district court’s decision to depart from the

sentencing guidelines is generally reviewed for abuse of

discretion. United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir.

1994)(en banc). However, since Gary failed to raise his present

arguments below, review is for plain error. See United States v.

Alford, 142 F.3d 825, 830 (5th Cir. 1998). 

The district court based its upward departure on the grounds

that Gary’s criminal history category did not adequately reflect

the seriousness of Gary’s past criminal conduct or the likelihood

that Gary would commit other crimes. The district court’s

reasons for departure were acceptable and adequately explained. 

See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3; United States v. Chappell, 6 F.3d 1095,

1102 (5th Cir. 1993); Ashburn, 38 F.3d at 809. Furthermore, the

extent of the upward departure, from a maximum guideline sentence

of 21 months’ imprisonment to 36 months’ imprisonment, was

reasonable. See id. at 805-06; United States v. Rosogie, 21 F.3d

632, 634 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Lambert, 984 F.2d 658,

664 (5th Cir. 1993).

 In light of the foregoing, the district court did not err,

plainly or otherwise, in upwardly departing from the applicable
No. 99-50304 

-3-

guideline range. Ashburn, 38 F.3d at 807. The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7215

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 22-7216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL IBUKUN OGINNI,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00231-LO-1; 1:20-cv-01596-

LO; 1:17-cr-00172-LO-1; 1:20-cv-01598-LO)

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7216 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ibukun Oginni, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7216 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ibukun Oginni seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Oginni has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the 

appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7216 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
# Euroopa Liidu L 124/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0650 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | L 124 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Õigusaktid | 59. aastakäik13. mai 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0650

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

L 124

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Õigusaktid

59. aastakäik13. mai 2016

---

| Sisukord | | II   Muud kui seadusandlikud aktid | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INSTITUTSIOONIDEVAHELISED KOKKULEPPED |
| | * | Euroopa Parlamendi ja komisjoni avaldus, mis tehakse 13. aprilli 2016. aasta institutsioonidevahelise parema õigusloome kokkuleppe vastuvõtmisel | 1 |

Sisukord

II   Muud kui seadusandlikud aktid

Lehekülg

INSTITUTSIOONIDEVAHELISED KOKKULEPPED

*

Euroopa Parlamendi ja komisjoni avaldus, mis tehakse 13. aprilli 2016. aasta institutsioonidevahelise parema õigusloome kokkuleppe vastuvõtmisel

1

| ET | Aktid, mille peakiri on trükitud harilikus trükikirjas, käsitlevad põllumajandusküsimuste igapäevast korraldust ning nende kehtivusaeg on üldjuhul piiratud.
  Kõigi ülejäänud aktide pealkirjad on trükitud poolpaksus kirjas ja nende ette on märgitud tärn. |
| --- | --- |

ET

Aktid, mille peakiri on trükitud harilikus trükikirjas, käsitlevad põllumajandusküsimuste igapäevast korraldust ning nende kehtivusaeg on üldjuhul piiratud.

Kõigi ülejäänud aktide pealkirjad on trükitud poolpaksus kirjas ja nende ette on märgitud tärn.

---

II Muud kui seadusandlikud aktid

INSTITUTSIOONIDEVAHELISED KOKKULEPPED

| 13.5.2016 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | L 124/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2016

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

L 124/1

---

EUROOPA PARLAMENDI JA KOMISJONI AVALDUS, MIS TEHAKSE 13. APRILLI 2016. AASTA INSTITUTSIOONIDEVAHELISE PAREMA ÕIGUSLOOME KOKKULEPPE VASTUVÕTMISEL

Euroopa Parlament ja komisjon leiavad, et kokkulepe (1) peegeldab Euroopa Parlamendi, nõukogu ja komisjoni vahelist tasakaalu ja nende vastavat pädevust, nagu on sätestatud aluslepingutes.

1

See ei piira 20. oktoobri 2010. aasta Euroopa Parlamendi ja Euroopa Komisjoni suhete raamkokkuleppe (2) kohaldamist.

2

---

(1)  
  ELT L 123, 12.5.2016, lk 1.

1

(2)  
  ELT L 304, 20.11.2010, lk 47.

2

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2021

b0524

Order 

Clerk

June 1, 2021

161609 & (68)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161609

COA: 344445

Macomb CC: 2017-002729-FC

DONALD JARELL ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2020 judgment 

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Macomb County Prosecuting 

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this 

order. The prosecutor shall pay particular attention to the defendant’s claim in Issue IV of 

his application that he was deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel based 

on the assertions made in the affidavit of Jerry Young, who was named as a witness in a 

timely filed alibi notice but was not called as a witness at trial.

The application for leave to appeal and motion to remand remain pending.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q of  Public  Storage
Properties,  Ltd. (the  "Partnership")  for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  Ronald L. Havner,  Jr., as Chief  Executive  Officer of Public
Storage,  Inc., and John Reyes,  as Chief  Financial  Officer of Public Storage,
Inc., each hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant
toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Partnership.

/s/  Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
------------------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    May 14, 2004

/s/  John Reyes
------------------------------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, Inc.,
         Corporate General Partner
Date:    May 14, 2004