alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MPR HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. DATED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         281,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               330,716
<PP&E>                                          71,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,924,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          793,605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,305,309
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,506,017)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (1,924,947)
<SALES>                                         55,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,965
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  794,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (833,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                258,271
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,091,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO GARCIA-VIRREY, ) No. 12-70213

)

Petitioner, ) Agency No. A090-065-343

)

v. ) MEMORANDUM*

)

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney )

General, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 1, 2015**

Pasadena, California

Before: FERNANDEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ,*** District

Judge.

Antonio Garcia-Virrey, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

FILED

JUN 16 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. 

**The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral

argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

***The Honorable Rosemary Marquez, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his application for cancellation of

removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). We deny the petition.

Garcia asserts that his procedural due process rights1

 were violated when the

Immigration Judge (IJ) admitted a police report into evidence at his cancellation

hearing without requiring cross-examination of the officer who prepared the

report.2

 See Vilchez v. Holder, 682 F.3d 1195, 1198–99 (9th Cir. 2012); Espinoza

v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 310–11 (9th Cir. 1995); Cunanan v. INS, 856 F.2d 1373,

1374–75 (9th Cir. 1988); see also Cinapian v. Holder, 567 F.3d 1067, 1074 (9th

Cir. 2009). We disagree. There was no evidence that the officer’s own

observations (for example the strong odor of alcohol) were not trustworthy. Thus,

those would be admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence,3

 which are more

stringent than the rules applied in these proceedings.4

 More importantly, it does

not appear that the BIA5

 relied on any improper material in that report. Thus, even

1

See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1270–71 (9th Cir. 2001).

2

We note that the IJ did not deny cross-examination; he indicated that he

would resolve the issue if it was raised later in the proceedings. It was not raised. 

3

See Fed. R. Evid. 803(8)(A).

4

See, e.g., Cinapian, 567 F.3d at 1074; Espinoza, 45 F.3d at 310; Cunanan,

856 F.2d at 1374.

5

See Vilchez, 682 F.3d at 1199.

2
if there were some unfairness,6

 the error, if any, was not prejudicial.7

Petition DENIED.

6

See id.

7

See id.

3
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Kevin J. Hunt and David P. Skarie, Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company, and I, Thomas G.
Granneman, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                           |  |                            |  |                                        
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|/s/ KEVIN J. HUNT          |  | /s/ DAVID P. SKARIE        |  | /s/ THOMAS G. GRANNEMAN                
|Kevin J. Hunt              |  | David P. Skarie            |  | Thomas G. Granneman                    
|Co-Chief Executive Officer |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.     |  | Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.     |  | Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.                 

Date: December 11, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Ralcorp Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Three Sigma Ventures Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      John A. Kuehne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                John A. KuehneJohn
                A. Kuehne
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              November
                14, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12
                                                                      ----------

Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED
SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                    February 4,
                                                                                                       1997
                                                        Years ended December 31,                    (inception)
                                                  -----------------------------------------        to December 31,
(dollars in thousands)                             2000            1999              1998                1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>              <C>               <C>
Earnings....................................       $8,619          $8,619            $8,619              $7,781
                                                   ======          ======            ======              ======

Fixed charges...............................       $   --          $   --            $   --              $   --
Preferred securities distributions..........        8,360           8,360             8,360               7,547
                                                   ------          ------            ------              ------
Total combined fixed charges and
   preferred securities distributions.......       $8,360          $8,360            $8,360              $7,547
                                                   ======          ======            ======              ======
Ratio of earnings to combined
    fixed charges and
    preferred securities distributions......         1.03            1.03              1.03                1.03
                                                   ======          ======            ======              ======
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 569 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 569

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for retroactive 
calculation since the start of combat operations in Afghanistan of days 
 of certain active duty or active service performed as a member of the 
Ready Reserve to reduce the eligibility age for receipt of retired pay 
                        for non-regular service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2017

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for retroactive 
calculation since the start of combat operations in Afghanistan of days 
 of certain active duty or active service performed as a member of the 
Ready Reserve to reduce the eligibility age for receipt of retired pay 
                        for non-regular service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reserve Retirement Deployment Credit 
Correction Act''.

SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE CALCULATION SINCE START OF COMBAT OPERATIONS IN 
              AFGHANISTAN OF DAYS OF CERTAIN ACTIVE DUTY OR ACTIVE 
              SERVICE TO REDUCE ELIGIBILITY AGE FOR RETIREMENT FOR NON-
              REGULAR SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 12731(f)(2)(A) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``January 28, 2008'' both places it 
appears and inserting ``October 7, 2001''.
    (b) Retroactive Application.--Section 12731(f) of title 10, United 
States Code, relating to age and service requirements for receipt of 
retired pay for non-regular service, shall be deemed to have been 
enacted on October 7, 2001, for purposes of applying the amendment made 
by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Mitchell Gross
---------------------------
Mitchell Gross
Chief Executive Officer
September 9, 2005
aa

¥ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service
“Nene
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health
Robert A. Taft Laboratories
4676 Columbia Parkway

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998
Phone: 513-533-6825
Fax: 513-533-6826

December 12, 2006

Peter M. Turcic, Director

Division of Energy Employees Occupational Iliness Compensation
U.S. Department of Labor

Room C-4511

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20210

Subject: SEC00060 Notice of Final Effect
Dear Mr. Turcic:

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required
by 42 CFR. pt. 83.17(c), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a
class of employees at the S-50 Oak Ridge Thermal Diffusion Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, as an
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness
Compensation Program Act of 2000, On November 9, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C.
7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the
SEC:

Employees of the Department of Energy predecessor agencies and their
contractors and-subcontractors who were monitored or should have been
monitored while working at the S-50 Oak Ridge Thermal Diffusion Plant working
for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days during the period
from July 9, 1944, through December 31, 1951, or in combination with work days
within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in ~
the SEC.

This designation became effective on December 9, 2006, as provided for under 42 U.S.C.
73841(14)(C). Hence, beginning on December 9, 2006, members of this class of employees, defined
as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

Sincerely,

=>. GA
fo) Larry J. Elliott, MSPH, CTH

Director
Office of Compensation Analysis and Support
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6061 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6061

    To require the head of each agency to submit to the Government 
  Accountability Office a monthly travel log, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2018

  Mr. Norman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the head of each agency to submit to the Government 
  Accountability Office a monthly travel log, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Formally List Your Travel Act'' or 
the ``FLY Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT MONTHLY TRAVEL LOGS.

    (a) In General.--Beginning October 1, 2018, on the first day of 
each month, an agency head shall submit to the Comptroller General of 
the United States a record of any official travel itinerary (referred 
to in this section as a ``travel log'') of the agency head for the 
previous month.
    (b) Penalty.--(1) Beginning with the fiscal quarter beginning on 
January 1, 2019, an agency head shall, out of funds appropriated 
specifically for the office of the agency head, pay to the general fund 
of the Treasury an amount equal to one percent of the annual budget of 
such office for each month during the previous quarter with respect to 
which the agency head has not submitted a travel log by the last day of 
such previous quarter.
    (2) Beginning with fiscal year 2020, in the case of an agency head 
who has not submitted any travel log during the previous fiscal year, 
the annual budget for the office of such agency head for the fiscal 
year shall be reduced by 15 percent.
    (c) Annual Report.--Not later than September 30 of each fiscal 
year, an agency head shall submit to the Committee on Appropriations of 
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Appropriations of the 
Senate a report on the total amount of official travel expenses 
incurred by the agency head during such fiscal year.
    (d) Prohibition.--Any agency head who holds a Senate-confirmed 
position may not purchase a first class seat on an airplane using 
Federal funds.
    (e) Agency Defined.--In this section, the term ``agency'' has the 
meaning given that term in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Pro-Fac
Cooperative,  Inc.  Form 10-Q for the period  ended  September  25,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000202932
<NAME>                                         Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-25-1999
<CASH>                                           10,832
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   128,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     488,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                672,723
<PP&E>                                          457,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                   93,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,352,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           443,628
<BONDS>                                         200,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               261
<PREFERRED>                                      93,353
<COMMON>                                         10,203
<OTHER-SE>                                       46,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,352,550
<SALES>                                         296,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                296,248
<CGS>                                           211,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   211,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 62,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               20,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,045
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 403
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        403
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 18, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-457 Lower Tribunal Nos. 18-8711B & 18-8754

________________ 

### Clayton Johnson, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard L. Hersch, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and HENDON, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See § 90.404(2) (a), Fla. Stat. (2018) ( providing that “[s]imilar fact evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible when relevant to prove a material fact in issue, including, but not limited to, proof of . . . identity”); Silver v. State, 278 So. 3d 337, 342-43 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (holding that, where an antecedent crime is sufficiently similar to the charged crime and contains unique features to indicate the same perpetrator, evidence of the earlier crime is admissible to establish identity); Grier v. State, 27 So. 3d 97, 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (concluding that collateral evidence did not overwhelm the evidence of the charged crime and become a “feature of the trial,” considering that the trial court gave cautionary instructions throughout the trial); see also Yisrael v. State, 993 So. 3d 952, 956-57 (Fla. 2008) (holding that a proponent of a business record may establish its admissibility through a certification that complies with sections 90.803(6)(c) and 90.902(11) of the Florida Statutes; and that, for the evidence to be admissible: “(a) the record was made at or near the time of the event; (2) was made by or from information transmitted by a person with knowledge; (3) was kept in the course of regularly conducted business activity; and (4) that it was made as a regular practice of that business to make such a record.”).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Monet Entertainment, Group Ltd.
(the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen Replin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






March 2, 2005                    /s/ Stephen Replin
-------------                    -----------------------
                                 Stephen Replin
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer