rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 25, 2015 / Notices 15795 


TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1 

21 CFR Section Form No. Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total annual 

responses 

Average 

burden per 

response 

Total hours 

1210.11 ................ 

1210.12 ................ 

FDA 1996; Sanitary inspection of 

dairy farms. 

FDA 1995; Physical examination of 

2 

1 

200 

1 

400 

1 

1.5 

0.5 

600 

0.5 

1210.13 ................ 

1210.14 ................ 

1210.20 ................ 

1210.23 ................ 

cows. 

FDA 1994; Tuberculin test ................ 

FDA 1997; Sanitary inspections of 

plants. 

FDA 1993; Application for permit ...... 

FDA 1815; Permits granted on certifi1 

2 

2 

2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

2 

2 

0.5 

2.0 

0.5 

0.5 

0.5 

4.0 

1.0 

1.0 

cates. 

Total .............. ............................................................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 607 

1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. 

TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1 

21 CFR Section Number of 

recordkeepers 

Number of 

records per 

recordkeeper 

Total annual 

records 

Average 

burden per 

recordkeeping 

Total hours 

1210.15 ................................................................................ 2 1 2 0.05 0.10 

1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. 

The estimated number of respondents 

and hours per response are based on our 

experience with the import milk permit 

program and the average number of 

import milk permit holders over the 

past 3 years. We estimate that two 

respondents will submit approximately 

200 Form FDA 1996 reports annually, 

for a total of 600 responses. We estimate 

the reporting burden to be 1.5 hours per 

response, for a total burden of 607 

hours. 

The Secretary of Health and Human 

Services has the discretion to allow 

Form FDA 1815, a duly certified 

statement signed by an accredited 

official of a foreign government, to be 

submitted in lieu of Forms FDA 1994 

and 1995. To date, Form FDA 1815 has 

been submitted in lieu of these forms. 

Because we have not received any 

Forms FDA 1994 and 1995 in the last 3 

years, the Agency estimates no more 

than one will be submitted annually. 

We estimate the reporting burden for 

each to be 0.5 hours per response for a 

total burden reporting burden of 0.5 

hours each. 

We estimate that two respondents will 

submit one Form FDA 1997 report 

annually, for a total of two responses. 

We estimate the reporting burden to be 

2.0 hours per response, for a total 

burden of 4 hours. We estimate that two 

respondents will submit one Form FDA 

1993 report annually, for a total of two 

responses. We estimate the reporting 

burden to be 0.5 hours per response, for 

a total burden of 1 hour. We estimate 

that two respondents will submit one 

Form FDA 1815 report annually, for a 

total of two responses. We estimate the 

reporting burden to be 0.5 hours per 

response, for a total burden of 1 hour. 

With regard to records maintenance, 

we estimate that approximately two 

recordkeepers will spend 0.05 hours 

annually maintaining the additional 

pasteurization records required by 

§ 1210.15, for a total of 0.10 hours 

annually. 

No burden has been estimated for the 

tagging requirement in § 1210.22 

because the information on the tag is 

either supplied by us (permit number) 

or is disclosed to third parties as a usual 

and customary part of the shipper’s 

normal business activities (type of 

product, shipper’s name and address). 

Under 5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2), the public 

disclosure of information originally 

supplied by the Federal Government to 

the recipient for the purpose of 

disclosure to the public is not subject to 

review by the Office of Management and 

Budget under the Paperwork Reduction 

Act. Under 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2)), the 

time, effort, and financial resources 

necessary to comply with a collection of 

information are excluded from the 

burden estimate if the reporting, 

recordkeeping, or disclosure activities 

needed to comply are usual and 

customary because they would occur in 

the normal course of business activities. 

Dated: March 19, 2015. 

Leslie Kux, 

Associate Commissioner for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06703 Filed 3–24–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4164–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Decision To Evaluate a Petition To 

Designate a Class of Employees From 

the Hanford Site in Richland, 

Washington, To Be Included in the 

Special Exposure Cohort 

AGENCY: National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health 

(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention, Department of Health 

and Human Services. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: NIOSH gives notice of a 

decision to evaluate a petition to 

designate a class of employees from the 

Hanford site in Richland, Washington, 

to be included in the Special Exposure 

Cohort under the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division 

of Compensation Analysis and Support, 

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum 

Avenue, MS C–46, Cincinnati, OH 

45226–1938, Telephone 877–222–7570. 

Information requests can also be 

submitted by email to DCAS@CDC.GOV. 
 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

15796 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 25, 2015 / Notices 


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: 42 CFR 83.9–83.12. 

Pursuant to 42 CFR 83.12, the initial 

proposed definition for the class being 

evaluated, subject to revision as 

warranted by the evaluation, is as 

follows: 

Facility: Hanford site. 

Location: Richland, Washington. 

Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All 

employees of Department of Energy 

contractors and subcontractors 

(excluding employees of the following 

Hanford prime contractors during the 

specified periods: Battelle Memorial 

Institute, January 1, 1984 through 

December 31, 1990; Rockwell Hanford 

Operations, January 1, 1984 through 

June 28, 1987; Boeing Computer 

Services Richland, January 1, 1984 

through June 28, 1987; UNC Nuclear 

Industries, January 1, 1984 through June 

28, 1987; Westinghouse Hanford 

Company, January 1, 1984 through 

December 31, 1990; and Hanford 

Environmental Health Foundation, 

January 1, 1984 through December 31, 

1990. 

Period of Employment: January 1, 

1984 through December 31, 1990. 

John Howard 

Director, National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06784 Filed 3–24–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163–19–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 

Services 

[Document Identifiers: CMS–10241, CMS– 

10249, and CMS–10545] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Centers for Medicare & 

Medicaid Services (CMS) is announcing 

an opportunity for the public to 

comment on CMS’ intention to collect 

information from the public. Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), federal agencies are required to 

publish notice in the Federal Register 

concerning each proposed collection of 

information, including each proposed 

extension or reinstatement of an existing 

collection of information, and to allow 

a second opportunity for public 

comment on the notice. Interested 

persons are invited to send comments 

regarding the burden estimate or any 

other aspect of this collection of 

information, including any of the 

following subjects: (1) The necessity and 

utility of the proposed information 

collection for the proper performance of 

the agency’s functions; (2) the accuracy 

of the estimated burden; (3) ways to 

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 

of the information to be collected; and 

(4) the use of automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology to minimize the information 

collection burden. 

DATES: Comments on the collection(s) of 

information must be received by the 

OMB desk officer by April 24, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: When commenting on the 

proposed information collections, 

please reference the document identifier 

or OMB control number. To be assured 

consideration, comments and 

recommendations must be received by 

the OMB desk officer via one of the 

following transmissions: OMB, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: CMS Desk Officer, Fax 

Number: (202) 395–5806 OR, Email: 

OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

To obtain copies of a supporting 

statement and any related forms for the 

proposed collection(s) summarized in 

this notice, you may make your request 

using one of following: 

1. Access CMS’ Web site address at 

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Paperwork 

ReductionActof1995. 

2. Email your request, including your 

address, phone number, OMB number, 

and CMS document identifier, to 

Paperwork@cms.hhs.gov. 

3. Call the Reports Clearance Office at 

(410) 786–1326. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Reports Clearance Office at (410) 786– 

1326. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), federal agencies 

must obtain approval from the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for each 

collection of information they conduct 

or sponsor. The term ‘‘collection of 

information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 

3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and 

includes agency requests or 

requirements that members of the public 

submit reports, keep records, or provide 

information to a third party. Section 

3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)) requires federal agencies 

to publish a 30-day notice in the 

Federal Register concerning each 

proposed collection of information, 

including each proposed extension or 

reinstatement of an existing collection 

of information, before submitting the 

collection to OMB for approval. To 

comply with this requirement, CMS is 

publishing this notice that summarizes 

the following proposed collection(s) of 

information for public comment: 

1. Type of Information Collection 

Request: Revision of a currently 

approved collection; Title of 

Information Collection: Survey of Retail 

Prices: Payment and Utilization Rates, 

and Performance Rankings; Use: This 

study is divided into two parts. Part I 

focuses on the retail community 

pharmacy consumer prices. It also 

includes reporting by the states of 

payment and utilization rates for the 50 

most widely prescribed drugs, and 

comparing state drug payment rates 

with the national retail survey prices. 

Part II focuses on the retail community 

pharmacy ingredient costs. This 

segment surveys the average acquisition 

costs of all covered outpatient drugs 

purchased by retail community 

pharmacies. The prices will be updated 

on at least a monthly basis. Subsequent 

to the publication of the 60-day Federal 

Register notice (79 FR 75816), the 

burden has been reduced by removing 

requirements for Part I pending funding 

decisions. There are no changes to Part 

II. Form Number: CMS–10241 (OMB 

control number 0938–1041); Frequency: 

Yearly and Occasionally; Affected 

Public: Private sector (Business or other 

for-profits); Number of Respondents: 

30,000; Total Annual Responses: 

30,000; Total Annual Hours: 15,000. 

(For policy questions regarding this 

collection contact: Lisa Ferrandi at 410– 

786–5445). 

2. Type of Information Collection 

Request: Extension of a currently 

approved collection; Title of 

Information Collection: Administrative 

Requirements for Section 6071 of the 

Deficit Reduction Act; Use: State 

Operational Protocols should provide 

enough information such that: The CMS 

Project Officer and other federal officials 

may use it to understand the operation 

of the demonstration, prepare for 

potential site visits without needing 

additional information, or both; the 

State Project Director can use it as the 

manual for program implementation; 

and external stakeholders may use it to 

understand the operation of the 

demonstration. The financial 

information collection is used in our 

financial statements and shared with the 

auditors who validate CMS’ financial 

position. The Money Follows the Person 

Rebalancing Demonstration (MFP) 

Finders File, MFP Program Participation 

Data file, and MFP Services File are 

used by the national evaluation 

contractor to assess program outcomes 

while we use the information to monitor 

program implementation. The MFP 

Quality of Life data is used by the 

national evaluation contractor to assess