22842 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2 Vice Chairman Daniel R. Pearson dissenting. 

3 Vice Chairman Daniel R. Pearson dissenting. 

subject articles from entry into the 

United States, and/or (2) issue one or 

more cease and desist orders that could 

result in a respondent being required to 

cease and desist from engaging in unfair 

acts in the importation and sale of such 

articles. Accordingly, the Commission is 

interested in receiving written 

submissions that address the form of 

remedy, if any, that should be ordered. 

If a party seeks exclusion of an article 

from entry into the United States for 

purposes other than entry for 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or likely to do so. For 

background, see In the Matter of Certain 

Devices for Connecting Computers via 

Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, 

USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994) 

(Commission Opinion). 

If the Commission contemplates some 

form of remedy, it must consider the 

effects of that remedy upon the public 

interest. The factors the Commission 

will consider include the effect that an 

exclusion order and/or cease and desist 

orders would have on (1) the public 

health and welfare, (2) competitive 

conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. 

production of articles that are like or 

directly competitive with those that are 

subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. 

consumers. The Commission is 

therefore interested in receiving written 

submissions that address the 

aforementioned public interest factors 

in the context of this investigation. 

If the Commission orders some form 

of remedy, the United States Trade 

Representative, as delegated by the 

President, has 60 days to approve or 

disapprove the Commission’s action. 

See Presidential Memorandum of July 

21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). 

During this period, the subject articles 

would be entitled to enter the United 

States under bond, in an amount 

determined by the Commission and 

prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Treasury. The Commission is therefore 

interested in receiving submissions 

concerning the amount of the bond that 

should be imposed if a remedy is 

ordered. 

Written Submissions: The parties to 

the investigation are requested to file 

written submissions on the issues 

identified in this notice. Parties to the 

investigation, interested government 

agencies, and any other interested 

parties are encouraged to file written 

submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding. Such 

submissions should address the 

recommended determination by the ALJ 

on remedy and bonding. Complainant 

and the Commission investigative 

attorney are also requested to submit 

proposed remedial orders for the 

Commission’s consideration. 

Complainant is also requested to state 

the date that the patent expires and the 

HTSUS numbers under which the 

accused products are imported. The 

written submissions and proposed 

remedial orders must be filed no later 

than close of business on May 10, 2010. 

Reply submissions must be filed no later 

than the close of business on May 17, 

2010. The written submissions must be 

no longer than 60 pages and the reply 

submissions must be no longer than 30 

pages. No further submissions on these 

issues will be permitted unless 

otherwise ordered by the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document and 12 

true copies thereof on or before the 

deadlines stated above with the Office 

of the Secretary. Any person desiring to 

submit a document to the Commission 

in confidence must request confidential 

treatment unless the information has 

already been granted such treatment 

during the proceedings. All such 

requests should be directed to the 

Secretary of the Commission and must 

include a full statement of the reasons 

why the Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 210.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is sought will be treated 

accordingly. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.42–46 and 210.50 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–46 and 

210.50). 

Issued: April 26, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10108 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–462 and 731– 

TA–1156–1158 (Final)] 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

Indonesia, Taiwan, and Vietnam 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(Commission) determines, pursuant to 

section 705(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)) (the Act), that an 

industry in the United States is 

threatened with material injury by 

reason of imports from Vietnam of 

polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs), 

provided for in subheading 3923.21.00 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States, that have been found 

by the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) to be subsidized by the 

Government of Vietnam.2 The 

Commission further determines, 

pursuant to section 735(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1673d(b)), that an industry in the 

United States is threatened with 

material injury by reason of imports 

from Indonesia, Taiwan, and Vietnam of 

PRCBs that have been found by 

Commerce to be sold in the United 

States at less than fair value (LTFV).3 In 

addition, the Commission determines 

that it would not have found material 

injury but for the suspension of 

liquidation. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective March 31, 2009, 

following receipt of petitions filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by 

Hilex Poly Co., LLC, Hartsville, SC and 

Superbag Corp., Houston, TX. The final 

phase of these investigations was 

scheduled by the Commission following 

notification of preliminary 

determinations by Commerce that 

imports of PRCBs from Indonesia, 

Taiwan, and Vietnam were being sold at 

LTFV within the meaning of section 

733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)) 

and that imports of PRCBs from 

Vietnam were being subsidized within 

the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act 

(19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)). Notice of the 

scheduling of the final phase of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 83 / Friday, April 30, 2010 / Notices 22843 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register of December 3, 2009 (74 FR 

63410). The hearing was held in 

Washington, DC, on March 16, 2010, 

and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these investigations to 

the Secretary of Commerce on April 26, 

2010. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4144 

(April 2010), entitled Polyethylene 

Retail Carrier Bags from Indonesia, 

Taiwan, and Vietnam: Investigation 

Nos. 701–TA–462 and 731–TA–1156– 

1158 (Final). 

Issued: April 27, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10114 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on April 

22, 2010, a proposed Partial Consent 

Decree (‘‘CD’’) in United States v. James 

Y. Saporito and Paul Carr, Civil Action 

No. 07–cv–03169, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern 

Division. 

In this action, the United States seeks 

on behalf of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

recovery of response costs incurred at 

the Crescent Plating Works Superfund 

Site (the ‘‘Site’’) in Chicago, Illinois, 

pursuant to Section 107 of the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607. The 

CD resolves a claim that Paul Carr 

(‘‘Settling Defendant’’), as current 

operator of the Site, is liable to the 

United States for reimbursement of costs 

incurred as a result of responding to a 

release, or threat of release, of hazardous 

substances from the Site. Based upon 

the Settling Defendant’s ability to pay, 

he will not be required to pay any 

response costs related to the Site. 

Contingent on the veracity of the 

Settling Defendant’s certifications made 

in the Partial Consent Decree and his 

fulfilling any obligations required in the 

Partial Consent Decree, the United 

States covenants not to sue the settling 

defendant’s pursuant to CERCLA 

Sections 106 and 107, 42 U.S.C. 9606 

and 9607. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

comments relating to this CD for a 

period of thirty (30) days from the date 

of this publication. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and either e-mailed 

to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. James Y. Saporito and Paul 

Carr, D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–08304/1. 

The CD may be examined at the Office 

of the United States Attorney, Northern 

District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 219 

S. Dearborn St., 5th Floor, Chicago, IL 

60604 and at U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 W. 

Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604. 

During the public comment period, the 

CD may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the CD 

may also be obtained by mail from the 

Consent Decree Library, U.S. 

Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by 

faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax number (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $5.25 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, United States 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2010–10088 Filed 4–29–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OMB Number 1121–0269] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Revision of a Currently 

Approved Collection; Comments 

Requested 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Revision of a 

Currently Approved Collection 2009 

Census of Publicly Funded Forensic 

Crime Laboratories. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of 

Justice Statistics (BJS) will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register Volume 75, Number 38, page 

8993 on February 26, 2010, allowing for 

a 60-day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until June 1, 2010. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to The Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–7285. 

Request written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agencies estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Revision of a currently approved 

collection. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1