alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
fsys-ex102_342.htm



Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

FUEL SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.

2011 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Pursuant to Sections 3(a) and 10(f) of the Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. 2011 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) and in accordance with the resolutions of the Board of Directors of Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted on August 30, 2015, the Plan shall be and hereby is amended as set forth herein:

(1)Section 8(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“(a) Effect of Change in Control on Awards. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Award document, in the event of a Change in Control all non-forfeited Options carrying a right to exercise that was not previously exercisable and vested shall become fully exercisable and vested as of the time of the Change in Control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Plan, at or immediately prior to the occurrence of a Change in Control, the Company may give a Participant written notice thereof requiring such Participant either: (i) (A) to exercise some or all of his or her Options on or prior to the date of the Change in Control, including all installments, or (B) to surrender some or all of such Options in return for a cash payment equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of the shares subject to the Option surrendered over the aggregate exercise price for such shares under the Option; or (ii) (A) to exercise some or all of his or her Options on or prior to the date of the Change in Control, including all installments, or (B) only with respect to Options with an exercise price that is less than the per share dollar value immediately prior to a Change in Control of the merger consideration to be received for the Stock upon such Change in Control (“in-the-money Options”), surrender some or all of such options in return for the assumption or substitution of such in-the-money Options in connection with a Change in Control, in which case such in-the-money Options will be adjusted as determined by the Committee to appropriately reflect the Change in Control.  Any Options which the Company requires to be exercised pursuant to this Plan and which shall not have been exercised in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and the written notice shall automatically lapse irrevocably and the Participant shall have no further rights with respect to such Options upon a Change in Control.”  

(2)In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged by the Amendment.

(3)This Amendment No. 1 shall be effective as of August 30, 2015.

 

By: /s/ Colin Johnston

       Colin Johnston

       Chair, Compensation Committee


			
	
" = "1" "

Draft  11/27/2012 1:20 PM

Testing Innova footer

" ""
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Willis, certify that:

1.  I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-Q  of  China  Wi-Max
Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
           material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  quarterly
           report is being prepared;

    b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
           and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
           the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
           the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)     all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

    b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a  significant role in  the  registrant's internal
           controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant  changes in internal  controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 19, 2009


By:      /s/ Michael Willis
         ----------------------------------
         Michael Willis
         Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2022

No. 04-22-00283-CR

EX PARTE Amanda Marie MONTOYA

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR11671

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 7, 2021, Appellant filed her notice of appeal in the trial court, but the 

notice was not forwarded to this court until May 12, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1), (e). 

On May 18, 2022, the State moved this court to dismiss this appeal for want of 

prosecution. The State noted the five-month delay in this court receiving the notice of appeal, 

and it argued that Appellant had done nothing to advance the case or prosecute the appeal.

Since then, the clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed, and Appellant’s brief is due 

on June 29, 2022.

The State’s motion to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution is denied.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy Y Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Fund hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.





RIDGEWOOD ENERGY Y FUND, LLCDated:
April 27, 2010
By:
/s/

ROBERT E. SWANSONName:

Robert E. SwansonTitle:

Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:
April 27, 2010
By:
/s/

KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRYName:

Kathleen P. McSherryTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Ridgewood Energy Y Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy Y Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|    |                                                                                                                         |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  |   | April 30, 2014 |   | By: | /s/ Brett H. Kaufman |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | Brett H. Kaufman |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10441 Summary Calendar

FRED SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TIM CURRY, Criminal District Attorney for Tarrant County Texas in his Official Capacity; MR. THORTON, Judge, Official Capacity; JACK STRICKLAND, Attorney in his Official Capacity; DON CARPENTER, Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-916-Y

-------------------- August 8, 2002 Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Fred Scott, Texas prisoner # 907987, appeals the dismissal his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. Scott argues that the district court erred in dismissing his claims against the defendants because he has satisfied the requirements of Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Scott’s claims for damagesNo. 02-10441 -2- against these defendants fail as a matter of law. Scott’s claims against Judge Thorton in his official capacity are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. See Warnock v. Pecos County, Texas , 88 F.3d 341, 343 (5th Cir. 1996). Scott’s claims against Carpenter and Curry in their official capacity fail because he has not alleged that an official policy or custom of Tarrant County resulted in the violation of his constitutional rights. See Baker v. Putnal , 75 F.3d 190, 195 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Piotrowski v. City of
Houston , 237 F.3d 567, 578 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 53 (2001). Finally, because Scott failed to provide any factual support for his conspiracy allegations, the district court did not err in dismissing his claims against Strickland, a private attorney. See Marts v. Hines , 68 F.3d 134, 136 (5th Cir. 1995). Scott also argues that the district court erred in dismissing his claims for prospective or injunctive relief against the defendants. Because Scott failed to show that Heck should not be used to bar his claims for prospective relief, the district court did not err in dismissing those claims. See Heck , 512 U.S. at 486-87. To the extent that Scott attempts to state a claim against the defendants for intentional infliction of emotional distress, we do not address that claim because it was raised for the first time on appeal. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51249

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ, also known as Jorge

Tolentino-Hernandez, also known as Braulio Toledo,

also known as Jorge Hernandez-Martinez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-118-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge MartinezHernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. §

1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS 

AUfflN 

QouroG.- 

-- 

!f 

(3. , 

iionorablr %. E. Davis, Dean 

North Texas &ioUitUAi Collage 

Arlington, Texas 

Dear Ylrr 

1940, you l 6vlsed 

@aduatlon thla 

year and nhoec pare or IS~~~XV, TO=@ 

to the state or 111 hana yaarago. 

This 8tadeat has 

Collsg4 tklnoe pr 

8 iagrlcklltural 

8tatO Of T4Xa8. 

pursnts mm the 

as to whether the 

out-of -atate tee 

Statutoa rhould 

ne of rraid Article 28540 

ent atudent~, who regletera 

more senestsr or tern hours of 

lralent to the amount charged 

8 by eimilar schools in t&e Qtato 

non-rrsiaant student shall be a 

unt to be deterulned a&i ilred bp 

studonto resident la Texas. Prorldaa, however, thst 

if this paragraph shall be held to be unconrtltufional or vold from any cause, there shall be oollected tros each non-resident otudent the suiu ot 

One HundreU ~oiiars ($100.00) for each sc:5eeter or 

Sixty-six Dollars and Arty-oevsn Cents ($66.07) 

ror eaah term. ir non-resident atud4nt is hereby 

defined to be a trtua4nt ot lose than twcbnty-ona 

(21) ytara of ags, Living away ~POP hle rtily ana 

NOCO*M"NtcATIO?4 19 ,o ntz 0ONvmYI0 ASa DlPA"TME?4TAt. OClNlOll UNLtsS ICPRO"~. ." WE AIIeRR=* *=H*-*L OR F1R‘T *sswT*w 
Hoacrable );;. 6. I;iavla, Dean, Paa;e 2 

whose rainily resides In another State, or whose 

ra5lig has resld4a within this ixat4 for a period 

of tlm less than twelve (121 mnths prior to the 

date or r4gistratlon, or s student or twonly-one 

(21) years of age or over who resides out of the 

Stat4 or who has resided within the State for a 

pariod 0r lees than twklve il2) ;nonths prior to 

the date or registration." 

Pros a readin& of tha last arntenc4 in the above 

quot4d s4otlon of tna statute it 1s seen that n student 

under twenty-one pears or ags, llvlni: away rrom his family, 

and whose fainilg rssldos in another state is a non-resident. 

Pros your latt4r w4 understand that the student in ~u4stlon 

ia a minor. If the parants of this student chnnged their 

domialle rrom Texas to the stat4 or Illinois, under the 

plain language 0r the statute we are comppelled to advlso 

you that the student must be oonsldered a non-resident and 

requlrsd to pay i44s aooorUin6ly. For rurtber elaboration 

on the general sub 

coplss or our 3 

cot mtter of your lnqulry w4 enolora 

Opin ens Nos. o-1459 and O-2033. 

Yours very truly 

Amiif?ZY GXNERAL OI" TXXAS 

Glenn R. law18 

Assistant 

APPROVEI;SEP 2'7, 1940 

/5--&6,&
Exhibit
      32.2





I,
      Michael A. Lesisko, Chief Financial Officer, of Univec, Inc.,
      certify,


pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted by 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of


2002,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December
      31,


2004
      (the
      "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies


with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act


of
      1934;
      and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
      all


material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Univec,


Inc.








Dated:
      September 15, 2005





By:
      /s/ Michael A. Lesisko


Michael
      A. Lesisko, Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting Roundtable Discussion.

# Date & Time:

Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 9 p.m.-2 p.m. (MST).

# Place:

Hyatt Regency Denver, 650 15th Street, Denver, CO 80202, (303) 436-1234.

# Agenda:

The Commission will host a voting systems testing laboratory roundtable discussion regarding the Technical Guidelines Development Committee's (TGDC) recommended voluntary voting system guidelines (VVSG). The discussion will be focused upon the following topics: (1) Whether the recommended TGDC standards create appropriate functional standards that promote innovation; (2) How to evaluate innovative systems, for which there are no standards for purposes of certification; (3) The value and risks associated with Open Ended Vulnerability Testing; (4) The processes associated with testing to the VVSG and possible modifications; (5) The implications of the recommended usability benchmarks on the testing laboratories; (6) The cost implications of the proposed VVSG.

This Meeting Will Be Open To The Public.

# Person To Contact For Information:

Matthew Masterson, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 08-985 Filed 3-4-08; 4:20 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
**CERTIFICATION          OF **

**CHIEF FINANCIAL          OFFICER**

**PURSUANT          TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                    Amended Year Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December                    31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                    or 15(d)                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                        |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | The                    information contained in such Amended Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB                    for                    the year ending December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all                    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                    of                    Univec, Inc. |

|                                        |                                   |                                       |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                        | **UNVICE,                INC.**        |
|                                   |                              |                                  |
| Date: February                22, 2007 | By:                          | /s/ Michael                A. Lesisko |
|                                        | Chief                Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Town and Country Appraisal Service, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John S. Chidester, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ John S. Chidester John S. Chidester Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   August  8, 2008
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132425 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132425 

 COA: 261569 

Oakland CC: 2005-198333-FH 

GEORGE LEE HOOPER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 29, 2007 

 Clerk