alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7975** 
WASIM ATA BEY, Erick Sealey , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. JOHN R. KYPLINSKI, Superintendent, Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 4:15

- cv - 00070

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : May 18 , 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016

Before SHEDD , DIAZ , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Wasim Ata Bey , Appellant Pro Se. John Chadwick Johnson , FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC , Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wasim Ata Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstratin g that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court den ies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Bey’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argumen t because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7261

BENJAMIN K. QUARMON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:15-cv-00210-MSD-TEM)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin K. Quarmon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin K. Quarmon seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies 

identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing 

of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Quarmon 

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar 

Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of ASI Solutions Incorporated on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-36513, 333-36511
and 333-36509) of our report dated May 12, 2000, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of ASI Solutions, Incorporated as of March 31,
2000 and 1999 and for the years ended March 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
May 12, 2000
Exhibit
33.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Housing Income Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending
September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeffrey Howard, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) 
  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated:
November 13, 2015

By: /s/
Jeff Howard
Jeff Howard
President and Chief Executive Officer

This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



-1-
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Regatta Capital Partners, Inc.,
 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Philip D. Miller, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




March 12, 2009                  /s/ Philip D. Miller
--------------                  ------------------------
                                Philip D. Miller
                                Chief Executive Officer







<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Deltek, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | 
|Dated: March 16, 2011 |  | /S/    KEVIN T.
PARKER                                                            
|                      |  | Kevin T. Parker
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer                   
|                      | 
|                      |  | /S/    MICHAEL P.
CORKERY                                                         
|                      |  | Michael P. Corkery
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Status of AWE Work Group 

Activities Related to Electro Met

Presented by Henry Anderson

Chairman of AWE Work Group

ABRWH Meeting

February 28-29, 2010
Work Group Focus

• Focus has been on review of original and 

revised NIOSH Evaluation Reports (ER) for 

Petition SEC-00136 

• Only incidental review of 2007 Site Profile: 

Appendix C Electro Metallurgical Company 

(TBD-6001)and 2011 Technical Basis 

Document for the Electro Metallurgical 

Company has been performed 
Documentation Chronology 

• NIOSH publishes TBD-6001 – December 13, 

2006

• NIOSH adds Appendix C (Electro Metallurgical) 

to TBD-6001 – December 21, 2007

• NIOSH issues original ER – July 21, 2009

• SC&A provides report reviewing ER – April 

2010

• NIOSH replaces Appendix C with stand-alone 

TBD for Electro Met – February 15, 2011
Documentation Chronology (con’t)

• SC&A issues revision to review of ER adding 

interview results – May 2011

• NIOSH prepares update on Electro Met 

activities for AWE Work Group – May 16, 2011

• NIOSH publishes revised ER – February 7, 

2012 

• SC&A provides comments to AWE Work Group 

based on time-limited review of revised ER –

February 21, 2012
Current Status

• Most of SC&A findings related to review of NIOSH 

2009 ER have been resolved in an SEC context 

except those relating to ability to reconstruct 

bounding internal doses for early operations and 

definition of proposed SEC class 

• In 2009 ER NIOSH determined that it was possible 

to calculate internal bounding doses

• In 2012 ER NIOSH concluded that it was not 

possible to calculate internal bounding doses 
Current Status (Con’t)

• SC&A believes that internal bounding does can be 

calculated for early operations (prior to 1948) 

based on extensive air sampling data (1948/1949) 

and the fact that bioassay sampling in 1944 is not 

statistically different from that in 1949 

• If an SEC is granted, SC&A believes that 

consideration should be given to limiting 

proposed class to workers in the Area Plant 

where MED/AEC operations were conducted and 

not those who worked in all areas at Electro Met
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 83 (Friday, April 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22773-22774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL10-59-000]


Southwest Power Pool, Inc, E.ON U.S. LLC, Cash Creek Generation 
LLC; Notice for Petition of Declaratory Order

April 23, 2010.
    Take notice that on April 9, 2010, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., E.ON 
U.S. LLC, and Cash Creek LLC (Cash Creek) filed a joint petition for 
declaratory order, pursuant to section 219 of the Federal Power Act, 16 
U.S.C. 825s, and section 207 of the Rules of Practice and Procedures of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), 18 CFR 285.207, 
requesting that the Commission decide certain disputed legal, policy 
and tariff issues related to a generator interconnection request 
submitted by Cash Creek.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to

[[Page 22774]]

receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9afacbbaaa6878580878cba9c9999869b9da98f8c9b8ac78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b3d3e293834151712151e280e0b0b14090f3b1d1e0918551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 10, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10058 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 3

- 40496 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LUCIO GARZA

- IBARRA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12

- CR

- 1042

- 1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lucio Garza

- Ibarra has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garza

- Ibarra has filed a response in which he moves for the appointment of new counsel

. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Garza

- Ibarra ’s claim of ineffective assistance of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40496 Document: 00512474195 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 1 3

- 40496
counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved o n direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Garza

- Ibarra ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Garza

- Ibarra’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

2 Case: 13-40496 Document: 00512474195 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories 

4676 Columbia Parkway 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

Phone: 877-222-7570 

Fax: 513-533-6826 

April 5, 2013 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00200 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Company in Fort Wayne, Indiana, as 

an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act of 2000. On March 6, 2013, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the 

SEC: 

All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked for Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co. at the 

covered facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana, from March 1, 1943, through December 31, 1947, for 

a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this 

employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or 

more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on April 5, 2013, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384l(14)(C). 

Hence, beginning on April 5, 2013, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this 

notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

[Signature on file] 

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11622-11623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-927]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 20 March 2008, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S.

[[Page 11623]]

Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address, or call 202-504-2200. 
Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing 
impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the 
meeting date. Dated in Washington DC, 29 February 29, 2008.

Thomas Luebke, AIA,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08-927 Filed 3-3-08: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
May 2, 2001


VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:	Division of Investment Management

0RE:	The Municipal Fund Accumulation Program, Inc.
Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the Registration Statement
     on Form N-1A (Securities Act File No. 2-57442, Investment
     Company Act No. 811-2694

Ladies and Gentlemen:


Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933,
     as amended (the "1933 Act"), The Municipal Fund Accumulation
     Program Inc. (the 'Fund') hereby certifies that:

(1)the form of Prospectus and Statement of Additional
      Information that would have been filed pursuant to Rule 497(c)
      under the 1933 Act would not have differed from that
      contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the
      Fund's Registration Statement on Form N-1A: and

(2)the text of Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the
      Fund's Registration Statement on Form N-1A was filed
      electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on April 25, 2001.

Very truly yours,

The Municipal Fund Accumulation Program, Inc.



______________________
Jodi M. Pinedo
Secretary of Fund
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: February 28-29, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Yujing Liu, PHD, MD, Chief, Office of Review, 
National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of 
Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Ste. 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-3169, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7beb2adaea9a098abaeb287a9aeafe9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6118140b080f063e0d0814210f08094f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 30, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-503 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Feed Materials Production Cen

(FMPC)

Special Exposure Cohort Upd

Mark R. Rolfes, M.S.

Health Physicist

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

December 2011

Tampa, FL
FMPC SEC Discussion Topics

 Coworker model for uranium internal expos

• Whitepaper on unmonitored subcontractor inta

adjustments provided to the Work Group in No

2011

 Validation of the HIS‐20 database

• NIOSH validation work completed and closed at 

February 8, 2011, Work Group meeting
FMPC SEC Discussion Topics—

 Recycled Uranium

• NIOSH delivered a white paper (November 2011

bounding the duration of potential exposures to

unblended Paducah tower ash

 Use of radon breath data for reconstructing 

from inhalation of Ra‐226 and Th‐230

• NIOSH work completed and closed at the April 1

Work Group meeting
FMPC SEC Discussion Topics—

 Review of radon emissions from the K‐65 si

associated exposures

• Moved to site profile discussions at the Februar

Work Group meeting

 Reconstruction of internal exposures from

inhalation of Th‐232

• Daily weighted exposure data (1953 ‐ 1967) clos

April 19, 2011, Work Group meeting

• Chest counts (1968 ‐ 1989) – MIVRML calibratio

response and data completeness evaluation pro

the Work Group in November 2011