alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 2 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 3 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 4 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 5 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 6 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 7 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 8 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 9 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 10 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 11 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 12 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 13 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 14 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 15 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 16 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 17 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 18 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 19 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 20 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 21 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 22 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 23 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 24 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 25 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 26 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 27 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 28 of 29
Case 3:11-cv-00142-RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 03/25/11 Page 29 of 29
*

The appellee was not served with process in the district court and is not

participating in this appeal. After an examination of the appellant’s brief and the

record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus the appeal is

submitted on the brief and the record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted October 18, 2006*

Decided October 23, 2006

Before

Hon. THOMAS E. FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 06-2792

DAVID J. BODNAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

STATE OF TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Central District of Illinois

No. 06-2020

Michael P. McCuskey, 

Chief Judge.

O R D E R

David Bodnar filed a complaint against the State of Texas for what he says

were constitutional violations arising from a wrongful arrest and prosecution in

Bexar County, Texas. Although it is difficult to decipher the exact nature of his

allegations, what is clear is that he wishes to sue Texas, the only named defendant,

for damages in the Central District of Illinois. But that is not allowed unless Texas

consented to suit in the federal courts or Congress validly abrogated Texas’s

immunity. See Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 98-99

(1984) (explaining that the Eleventh Amendment confers upon States immunity

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
No. 06-2792 Page 2

from suit in federal courts absent State’s consent or Congress’s unequivocal intent

to abrogate that immunity); see also Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 419 U.S. 58,

66 (1989) (“Section 1983 provides a federal forum to remedy many deprivations of

civil liberties, but it does not provide a federal forum for litigants who seek a

remedy against a State for alleged deprivations of civil liberties” unless the State

has waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity); Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332,

342 (1979) (explaining that Congress did not intend for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to override

States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity). Neither exception is present here. 

Accordingly, the district court was correct that it lacked jurisdiction over this

subject matter and properly dismissed the case without prejudice to Bodnar’s

refiling his claim in the proper jurisdiction. See Enk v. Brophy, 124 F.3d 893, 898

(7th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Postal Service Board of Governors

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Tuesday, March 4, 2008.

# Place:

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

### Tuesday, March 4 at 11 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Product Pricing.

3. Financial Update.

                    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.                          ( print page 10498)    

5. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 08-890 Filed 2-25-08; 3:50 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6090 

To provide for a report by the Committee on Technology of the National 

Science and Technology Council on machine learning and artificial intelligence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2018 

Mrs. LAWRENCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To provide for a report by the Committee on Technology 

of the National Science and Technology Council on machine learning and artificial intelligence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Artificial Intelligence 

5 Reporting Act of 2018’’ or the ‘‘AIR Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON MACHINE LEARNING AND ARTIFICIAL 

7 INTELLIGENCE. 

8 Not later than 120 days after the enactment of this 

9 Act, and annually thereafter, the subgroup on Machine 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6090 IH

1 Learning and Artificial Intelligence of the Committee on 

2 Technology of the National Science and Technology Coun3 cil shall submit to the Committee on Oversight and Gov4 ernment Reform and the Committee on Science, Space, 

5 and Technology of the House of Representatives and the 

6 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of 

7 the Senate a report containing— 

8 (1) a strategic plan for unclassified machine 

9 learning and artificial intelligence research and de10 velopment, in consultation with the Networking and 

11 Information Technology Research and Development 

12 program and appropriate subgroups of such pro13 gram, including the Robotics and Intelligent Sys14 tems Interagency Working Group; 

15 (2) the use and status of unclassified machine 

16 learning and artificial intelligence applications across 

17 the Federal Government; and 

18 (3) efforts taken to enhance the Federal re19 search and development enterprise by embracing a 

20 diverse workforce. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
* The Hon. Herman J. Weber, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0147n.06 Filed: February 24, 2005 NO. 01-5340 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ROBERT L. LARKIN and ) BARBARA A. LARKIN, ) ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ) WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ) PFIZER, INC., and G.D. SEARLE & CO., ) ) ) Defendants-Appellees. )

______________________________________ BEFORE: MERRITT and DA UGHTREY, Circuit Judges, and WEBER, *District Judge.

PER CURIAM. In this products liability case, t he district court exercised diversity jurisdiction in granting summary judgment to the defendants, based on the court’s conclusion that, although the Kentucky state courts had not spoken to the issue, the learned intermediary doctrine should be applied toinsulate from liability the manufacturers of two drugs taken by plaintiff Robert Larkin. One or both of those drugs, prescribed by Larkin’s physician, Dr. Reynolds, had caused a life-threatening skin condition that Reynolds- 2 - knew was a risk associated with each drug, but about which he had given Larkin no information because Reynolds did not believe the risk was significant. On appeal, we could discern no way in which to predict with assurance what the state courts would hold, if faced with a request to adopt t he learned intermediary doctrine, and we therefore certified the question to the Kentucky Supreme Court. In a recent opinion, the Court adopted the doctrine in a cl osely divided opinion re ported at Larkin v. Pfizer , No. 2002-SC-0746-CL, 2004 WL 1361954 (Ky. June 17, 2004). Based on that decision, we now AFFIRM the judgment of the district c ourt granting summary judgment to the defendants.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Randall J. Steward, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Rayovac Corporation (the registrant);



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the
condensed consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;



4.The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)[paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];



c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5.The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and



b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                                           
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: December 14, 2004 |  | /s/    RANDALL J.
STEWARD                 
|                        |  | Randall J. Steward Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Boardof Directors Spectrum 

Brands, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-162057) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-162505) on Form S-8, of Spectrum Brands, Inc. of our report dated December 29, 2009, with respect to the consolidatedstatements of financial position of Spectrum Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2009 (Successor Company) and September 30, 2008 (Predecessor Company), and the related consolidated statements of operations,shareholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows, for the period August 31, 2009 to September 30, 2009 (Successor Company), the period October 1, 2008 to August 30, 2009, and the years endedSeptember 30, 2008 and 2007 (Predecessor Company), and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Brands, Inc. 

Our report refers to explanatory paragraphs that describe the Company’s adoption of the provisions of ASC Topic 852, “*Reorganization*” formerly American Institute of Certified PublicAccountants’ Statement of Position 90-7, “*Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code”*in 2009, and to a change in the method of accounting for defined benefit pension and other post retirementbenefits in conformity with ASC 715, “*Compensation – Retirement Benefits*” formerly FAS 158, “*Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and other Postretirement Plans*” in 2007, and the adoption ofthe measurement date provision of ASC 715 in 2009.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 6569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-495]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 6569]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2008-10 of January 29, 
                2008

                
Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs 
                Related to Africa and the Middle East

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and 
                the laws of the United States, including sections 2 and 
                4(a)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 
                1962 (the ``Act''), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601 and 
                2603), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code:

                (1) I hereby determine, pursuant to 2(c)(1) of the Act, 
                that it is important to the national interest to 
                furnish assistance under the Act in an amount not to 
                exceed $32 million from the United States Emergency 
                Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose 
                of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration 
                needs, including by contributions to international, 
                governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and 
                payment of administrative expenses of the Bureau of 
                Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department 
                of State, related to humanitarian needs in Africa and 
                in the West Bank and Gaza; and

                (2) the functions of the President in relation to this 
                memorandum under 2(d) of the Act, and of establishing 
                terms and conditions under section 2(c)(1) of the Act, 
                are assigned to you.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 29, 2008.

[FR Doc. 08-495
Filed 2-1-08; 8:58 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6084 

AN ACT 

To amend title VII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a single point of contact at the Social Security Administration for individuals who are victims of identity 

theft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6084 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Social Secu3 rity’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR IDENTITY THEFT 

5 VICTIMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title VII of the Social Security 

7 Act (42 U.S.C. 901 et seq.) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 

9 ‘‘SECTION 714. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR IDENTITY 

10 THEFT VICTIMS. 

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of Social Se12 curity shall establish and implement procedures to ensure 

13 that any individual whose social security account number 

14 has been misused (such as to fraudulently obtain benefits 

15 under title II, VIII, or XVI of this Act, in a manner that 

16 affects an individual’s records at the Social Security Ad17 ministration, or in a manner that prompts the individual 

18 to request a new social security account number) has a 

19 single point of contact at the Social Security Administra20 tion throughout the resolution of the individual’s case. The 

21 single point of contact shall track the individual’s case to 

22 completion and coordinate with other units to resolve 

23 issues as quickly as possible. 

24 ‘‘(b) SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT.— 
3 

•HR 6084 EH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection 

2 (a), the single point of contact shall consist of a 

3 team or subset of specially trained employees who— 

4 ‘‘(A) have the ability to coordinate with 

5 other units to resolve the issues involved in the 

6 individual’s case, and 

7 ‘‘(B) shall be accountable for the case until 

8 its resolution. 

9 ‘‘(2) TEAM OR SUBSET.—The employees in10 cluded within the team or subset described in para11 graph (1) may change as required to meet the needs 

12 of the Social Security Administration, provided that 

13 procedures have been established to— 

14 ‘‘(A) ensure continuity of records and case 

15 history, and 

16 ‘‘(B) notify the individual when appro17 priate.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) shall take effect 180 days after the date 

20 of enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6084 

AN ACT 

To amend title VII of the Social Security Act to 

victims of identity theft. Security Administration for individuals who are provide for a single point of contact at the Social
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Monet Entertainment, Group Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen Replin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






March 2, 2005                    /s/ Stephen Replin
-------------                    ------------------------
                                 Stephen Replin
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer