alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6260 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LAWRENCE BERNARD GARRISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:98-cr-00132-JCC-14; 1:01-cv-00647-JCC)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Bernard Garrison, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Bernard Garrison seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369

(4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Garrison has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Office of Compensation Analysis and 

Support

Program Evaluation Report 

Document Number: 

 OCAS-PER-004 

Effective Date: 

 02/15/2005 

Revision No. 0 

Application of photofluorography at the Pinellas Plant Page 1 of 3

 

Approval: Signature on File Date: 03/15/2005 J.W. Neton, Associate Director for Science 

Supersedes: 

 None 

RECORD OF ISSUE/REVISIONS

ISSUE 

AUTHORIZATION 

DATE

EFFECTIVE 

DATE

REV. 

NO.

DESCRIPTION

02/15/2005 02/15/2005 0 

New document to evaluate the programmatic 

effect of the discovery of photofluorographic 

examinations on dose reconstructions for 

employees of the Pinellas Plant. 

1.0 Description

During the week of January 23, 2005, a reproduction of a photofluorography (PFG) film was discovered 

in a claimant’s medical records from the Pinellas Plant. This was the first evidence of PFG use at 

Pinellas, and all assigned chest X-ray doses for Pinellas dose reconstructions completed prior to this 

discovery were based on standard 14inch by 17 inch films. Photofluorography was sometimes used at 

other Department of Energy Sites but had fallen out of favor by 1960 at the latest1

, largely due to the 

high organ doses relative to the doses for 14” x 17” films. In the absence of information to the contrary, 

1959 can be considered the latest year in which photofluorography can reasonably be assumed to have 

been used. The organ doses resulting from PFG are higher than those for conventional PA chest 

radiography for selected organs, therefore this program evaluation report (PER) examines medical 

dose for previously completed Pinellas claims to determine whether the doses were underestimated. 

2.0 Evaluation

On January 26, 2005, the NIOSH OCAS Claims Tracking System (NOCTS) was queried 

to determine which claims could be affected by this discovery. The considered claims 

were limited to those for which: (1) OCAS review had been completed; (2) probability of 

causation (POC) was less than 50%, and (3) the energy employee worked at the
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029069
<NAME> ALARIS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          29,468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,946)
<INVENTORY>                                     79,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,470
<PP&E>                                         112,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                (50,394)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 644,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,326
<BONDS>                                        399,623
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       203,652
<OTHER-SE>                                    (80,534)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   644,377
<SALES>                                        380,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               380,068
<CGS>                                          191,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               164,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,799)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,199)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated July 23, 1999 (except for Note 13 as to which
the date is July 29, 1999), accompanying the consolidated financial
statements of Isonics Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") included
in the Company's Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended April 30, 1999. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(File No. 333-74339 effective March 12, 1999).


/s/ Grant Thornton


San Jose, California
February 15, 2000
2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 9-9-2009 

# D onlin v . P hi lip s Li ght ing P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 07-4060

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" D onl in v . P hi l ips L i ght in g " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 551. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/551UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT
N o. 07- 4060 N o. 07- 4081
CO L L E E N DONL I N, A ppel l ee,

v. P HI LI P S LI GHTI NG N ORTH AM ERI CA

CO RP OR AT I ON d /b /a P h i l i p s L i g h t i n g C o m p a n y, A p p e lla n t. O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e M id d le D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . N o. 05- cv- 00585) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e R i char d P. C onaboy

____________ P re s e n t: S C IR IC A , C hi ef Judge , F U E N T E S a n d H A R D IM A N , C i r cui tJudges
. S UR P ET I TI ON F OR P ANE L R EHE ARI NG

__________ T he j udges w ho par t i ci pat ed i n t he dec i s i on of thi s C our thavi ng cons i der ed the pet i t i on forr ehea r i ng fi l ed byPhi l i ps L i ght i ng N or t h A m er i ca Corpor at i on i n t he above
ent i t l ed ca s e, panel r ehea r i ng i s her ebyG R A N T E D fort he r eas ons s t at ed. T he pr ece dent i al opi ni on and j udgm entfi l ed on A pr i l 23, 2009 ar e her ebyV A C A T E D and the a tta c h e d o p in io n is f

ile d f o rt h w ith
. B yth e C o u rt,

/ s /T hom as M . H ar di m an C i r cui tJ udge2

D at ed: Sept ember 9, 2009 t m m / cc: J acque l i ne E. B edar d, E s q. T heodor e R . L aputka, E s q. D avi d Fi ne, E s q. S te p h e n D . R h o a d e s , E s q . A m yL . G r off, E s q.
A Tribute to William “Bill” Field, Ph.D., M.S.

Members of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) wish to pay 

tribute to Dr. William “Bill” Field who died at the age of 68 from refractory mantle cell 

lymphoma on November 4, 2022. Bill was appointed to the Board by President Barack Obama 

in 2009. 

Bill’s lifelong interest in the health effects of radiation began with his determination to measure 

the level of radioactive iodine released into the environment from Three Mile Island nuclear 

power plant nuclear accident in 1979. Bill worked as a Health Physicist for the University of 

California, Berkeley until he suffered disabling encephalopathy from an accidental, work-related 

exposure to multiple neurotoxins. Following the accident in 1986, Bill devoted himself to raising 

his twins as he convalesced. Through Iowa Vocational Rehabilitation Bill started taking 

graduate classes at The University of Iowa in 1989 and completed his PhD in Preventive 

Medicine and Environmental Health in 1994. Bill joined the faculty at The University of Iowa in 

1998. After his retirement in January 2022, Bill continued research on radon-related health 

effects as Professor of Clinical Reproductive Sciences, Columbia University, New York. 

Bill is recognized internationally for his expertise in radon and radiation health effects. He 

served on other national and World Health Organization boards during his career. He established 

the Occupational Epidemiology Training Program at The University of Iowa College of Public 

Health. He worked with professional organizations to improve radon testing and to educate the 

public on health risks from radon. Above all, he was a compassionate mentor who delighted in 

guiding his students towards independent careers in public health. 

The Board greatly benefitted from and will long remember Bill’s integrity, humor, kindness and 

warm softspoken manner, his chairing of work groups, and his good company during meetings. 

Bill made significant contributions to the ongoing work of the Board during his 12 years of 

service. 

This tribute is hereby adopted this 8th day of December 2022, at the 149th meeting of the 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health in Saint Petersburg, Florida.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Lisa Plunkett et al., * From the 68th District

 Court of Dallas County,

 Trial Court No. 02-1176-C.

Vs. No. 11-13-00129-CV * May 29, 2015

Connecticut General Life Insurance * Memorandum Opinion by McCall.

Company and South Central RS, Inc., (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J. and McCall, sitting by

 assignment)

 (Bailey, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the orders below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

orders of the trial court are in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against Appellants, Lisa Plunkett et al.
Presidential Documents

7181 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 25 

Wednesday, February 6, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13458 of February 4, 2008 

Implementation of the Protocol Additional to the Agreement 

Between the United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United 

States of America 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including the United States Additional 

Protocol Implementation Act (the ‘‘Act’’)(Public Law 109–401) and section 

301 of title 3, United States Code, and in order to facilitate implementation 

of the Act and the Protocol Additional to the Agreement between the United 

States and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of 

Safeguards in the United States of America (the ‘‘Additional Protocol’’), 

it is hereby ordered as follows: 

Section 1. The Secretaries of State, Defense, Commerce, and Energy, the 

Attorney General, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and heads of such 

other agencies as appropriate, each shall issue, amend, or revise, and enforce 

such regulations, orders, directives, instructions, or procedures as are necessary to implement the Act and United States obligations under the Additional Protocol. 

Sec. 2. The Secretary of Commerce, with the assistance, as necessary, of 

the Attorney General, is authorized to obtain and to execute warrants pursuant to section 223 of the Act for the purpose of gaining complementary 

access to locations subject to regulations issued by the Department of Commerce pursuant to section 1 of this order. 

Sec. 3. The Secretaries of State, Defense, Commerce, and Energy, the Attorney 

General, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and heads of such other departments and agencies as appropriate, are authorized to carry out, consistent 

with the Act and in accordance with subsequent directives, appropriate 

functions that are not otherwise assigned in the Act and are necessary 

to implement the Act and United States obligations under the Additional 

Protocol. The Secretary of State shall perform the function of providing 

notifications or information to the Congress when required by the Act. 

Sec. 4. This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law 

and subject to the availability of appropriations. 


pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS3
7182 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

Sec. 5. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or 

benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any 

party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, 

or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

February 4, 2008. 

[FR Doc. 08–568 

Filed 2–5–08; 11:55 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of IX Energy Holdings,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steven Hoffmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








November  23,
      2009
            /s/
      Steven HoffmannSteven
      HoffmannChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TYRONE H. CUMMINGS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-1656

LT Case No. 1993-CF-0566-B-Z

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed September 6, 2022

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Marion County, 

Anthony M. Tatti, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Victoria 

Rose Cordero, Assistant Public Defender, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, 

and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
Example

Enclosed you will find a summary of your phone interview that was conducted on July 25, 2006 with 

a representative of Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), the contractor assisting the National 

Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) with the dose reconstruction process. We 

would like to give you the opportunity to review the information contained in the enclosed summary. 

Your review will help us ensure the information accurately reflects what you provided to us during the 

phone interview before continuing with the dose reconstruction. If you have any corrections or 

additions to make to the report, please call ORAU toll-free at 1-800-790-6728 (1-800-790-ORAU) 

within two weeks so that we may incorporate these changes into your record. Otherwise, we will 

proceed with the dose reconstruction for your claim. If you call, please ask for your interviewer by 

name so that we can direct your call efficiently.

This information, along with the exposure monitoring information, will be used to conduct the dose 

reconstruction for your claim. Once your case has been assigned to dose reconstruction, you will be 

sent another letter with the information on the individual who will be performing your dose 

reconstruction.

Enclosure

Sincerely,

ORAU Team

Dose Reconstruction Project for NIOSH

cc:

Telephone Interview Center

4850 Smith Rd. Suite 200 Cincinnati, OH 45212-2742

Toll-free 1-800-790-ORAU(6728)
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Periodic Report of Sinocom Pharmaceutical, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the transitional period ended September 30, 2009, (the Report), I, Tuck Wing Pang,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  November 12, 2009 /s/ Tuck Wing Pang Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### REVISED MAY 8, 2008 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51335 Summary Calendar

REBECA PEREZ Plaintiff-Appellant v. POLICE CHIEF VICTOR ARAIZA; LORENZO GARCIA, El Paso Independent School District Superintendent; ANTHONY SAFI; EL PASO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CV-00217
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rebeca Perez, prose, is seeking a subpoena to obtain a police report under the Texas Public Information Act that was withheld from her pursuant toTexas Government Code section 552.108(a)(2). We have reviewed the briefs and the applicable law. Perez presents no valid argument as to how a federal court has subject matter jurisdiction over her claim. She does not allege diversity United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 25, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51058

2 jurisdiction, nor does she allege her action arises under any applicable federal law as a basis for federal question jurisdiction. See, e.g., Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). Perez is challenging the Texas Attorney General’s application of Texas state law, which, as currently alleged, is a pure state lawclaim. We therefore agree with the district court’s conclusion that we have no subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. The summary judgment isAFFIRMED for the reasons given by thedistrict court in its opinion.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the filing of SureQuest Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”)Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Stanley Janczyk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant tothe 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (SS) 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/ Stanley  Janczyk     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Stanley  Janczyk         |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
|                     |
| March 31,  2003          |

 

----
|  | (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aurios Inc. for the quarter ended      September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended September 30, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Aurios    Inc. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Paul Attaway                                                            |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                        |
|   | Name:  | Paul      Attaway                                                           |
|   |   |                                                                        |
|   | Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and  Director |
|   |   |                                                                        |
|   | Date:  | November      15, 2010                                                      |

----