alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

Exhibit 8

|Company Name                                         | Location       
|---------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
|Alexandria Migration Technologies Ltd.               | Israel         
|Alphatech (2000) Srl                                 | Romania        
|ASE Advanced Systems Eourope B.V                     | The Netherlands
|BluePhoenix Solutions B.V                            | The Netherlands
|BluePhoenix Solutions GmbH                           | Germany        
|BluePhoenix Solutions Ltd.                           | Cyprus         
|BluePhoenix Solutions Nordic, ApS                    | Denmark        
|BluePhoenix Solutions Pty Ltd.                       | Australia      
|BluePhoenix Solutions SRL                            | Italy          
|BluePhoenix Solutions UK Limited                     | United Kingdom 
|BluePhoenix Solutions USA Inc                        | U.S.A          
|Burford International Applications Ltd.              | United Kingdom 
|Burford management services PTE                      | Singapore      
|Ce-Post Ltd.                                         | Israel         
|Crystal America Inc.                                 | USA            
|Crystal Europe (1999) B.V                            | The Netherlands
|Crystal Sapphire Ltd.                                | Israel         
|Intercomp Inc.                                       | USA            
|Intercomp Ltd.                                       | Israel         
|IntraComp Group Inc.                                 | USA            
|Level 8 Systems Ltd.                                 | Israel         
|Liacom Systems Ltd.                                  | Israel         
|Liraz Systems (Investments) Ltd.                     | Israel         
|Liraz Systems Export (1990) Ltd.                     | Israel         
|Liraz Systems Ltd.                                   | Israel         
|M.S.I Multiconn Solutions international  (1995) Ltd. | Israel         
|Mainsoft Corporation Inc.                            | USA            
|Mainsoft R&D Ltd.                                    | Israel         
|Mainsoft Israel Ltd.                                 | Israel         
|Multiconn Technologies Ltd.                          | Israel         
|Outlook&BluePhoenix Ltd.                             | Israel         
|S.C.H software conversion house Ltd.                 | Israel         



---

---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10497-10498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-890]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Tuesday, March 4, 2008.

Place: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 

Tuesday, March 4 at 11 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Product Pricing.
    3. Financial Update.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

[[Page 10498]]

    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Contact Person for More Information: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08-890 Filed 2-25-08; 3:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Wi-Max Communications, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Berman,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 24,
      2010
              
              
              
              By:  /s/
      Steven Berman
              ----------------------------------
              Steven
      Berman
              Chief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Heuristic Development Group, Inc.
Manhattan Beach, California


We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Heuristic Development 
Group, Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 1997, and the 
related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (capital 
deficiency) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period then 
ended and for the period from July 20, 1994 (inception) through December 31, 
1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's 
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial 
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards. Those standards required that we plan and perform the audit to 
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free 
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, 
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. 
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and 
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall 
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a 
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements enumerated above present fairly, in 
all material respects, the financial position of Heuristic Development Group, 
Inc. at December 31, 1997 and the results of its operations and cash flows 
for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and for the period 
from July 20, 1994 (inception) through December 31, 1997 in conformity with 
generally accepted accounting principles.


Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
February 4, 1998
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of ALARIS Medical Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William C. Bopp, Sr.Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 
| (1)    | The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| /s/ WILLIAM C.  BOPP                               |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William C.  Bopp                                   |
| Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
| March 5, 2003                                      |

 

----
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, Wisconsin

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

Michael H. Gibson

 Franklin, Ohio

Mark A. Griffon

 Salem, New Hampshire

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D.

 New York, New York

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Loretta R. Valerio

 Santa Fe, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

July 27, 2012

The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Madam Secretary:

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

evaluated Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00190 concerning 

workers at Titanium Alloys Manufacturing in Niagara Falls, NY, under the 

statutory requirements established by the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA) and 

incorporated into 42 C.F.R. § 83.13.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for:

“All employees who worked in any area or building at Titanium 

Alloys Manufacturing from January 1, 1955 through December 31, 

1956.”

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and 

other information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with 

sufficient accuracy for members of this group, and therefore a class 

covering this group should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs 

with this determination.

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the June 19 to 21, 

2012, Board meeting held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, the Board 

recommends that this class not be added to the SEC.

Enclosed is the documentation from the Board meeting(s) where this SEC 

class was discussed. The documentation includes copies of the petition, 

the NIOSH review thereof, and related materials. If any of these items are 

unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

[Signature on file]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
The Secretary July , 2012
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00195

- CR

Guillermo MORALES III,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

F rom the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7388

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED IN PART

. Appellant’s brief is due on or before January 13, 202 2

.

____________ _____________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of November, 2021

.

______ _____________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.8


 








FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL
LEASE AGREEMENT


 


This First
Amendment to the Commercial Lease Agreement (the “FIRST AMENDMENT” ) is made this 25th day of of September,
2015, (the “EFFECTIVE” DATE) by and between Chino Valley Properties, LLC., CCC Holdings, LLC. And Alan Abrams,
Individually as Personal Guarantor.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS,
Landlord and Tenant heretofore entered into a Commercial Lease Agreement (the “LEASE”) executed and effective as of
August 6, 2015 for the lease on the facilities commonly known as 2144 & 2148 N. Road 1 East Chino Valley, AZ 83462; and


 


WHEREAS,
The parties hereto desire to change the name of the current tenant name from CCC Holdings, LLC to C3C3 Group, LLC.


 


WHEREAS,
all defined terms used in the Lease shall have the same meaning herein as therein. 


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt
of which is acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Tenant Name. The Tenant Name to be C3C3 Group, LLC.



 


Your signature
below will indicate that you agree to the basic terms and conditions as set forth herein.







 





	Chino Valley Properties, LLC.	 	CCC Holdings, LLC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 
	Name:	 	 	Name:	 
	Title:	 	 	Title:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Alan Abrams, Individually.	 	C3C3 Group, LLC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 
	Name:	 	 	Name:	 
	Title:	Personal Guarantor	 	Title:
Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



We have issued our report dated January 23, 2004 (except with respect to the matters discussed in Note 17, as to which the date is April 27,
2004), accompanying the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Syntroleum Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report
in the Registration Statements of Syntroleum Corporation on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-111716, and File No. 333-62290) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-104360, File No. 333-33345, File No. 333-53714, File No. 333-62862, and File No. 333-64321).



|                  
|------------------
|GRANT THORNTON LLP
|                  
|Tulsa, Oklahoma   
|May 12, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00974

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.G. , J.G., and J.G., Children

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 1222

- CV

- D

Honorable Robin V. Dwyer, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed against Monica Gallegos.

SIGNED May 29, 2019.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, Wisconsin

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

Michael H. Gibson

 Franklin, Ohio

Mark A. Griffon

 Salem, New Hampshire

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

Robert W. Presley

 Seymour, Tennessee

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

March 28, 2011

The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Madam Secretary:

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has evaluated 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00131 concerning employees who 

worked at the Bliss and Laughlin Steel Company in Buffalo, New York, under 

the statutory requirements established by the Energy Employees Occupational 

Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA) and incorporated into 

42 CFR Sec. 83.13. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

(NIOSH) has recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for 

workers at the Bliss and Laughlin Steel Company located at 110 Hopkins 

Street, Buffalo, New York during the period from January 1, 1951 through 

December 31, 1952, and during the residual period from January 1, 1953 

through December 31, 1998. NIOSH found that it has access to adequate 

exposure monitoring and other information necessary to do individual dose 

reconstructions with sufficient accuracy for members of this group, and 

therefore a class covering this group should not be added to the SEC. The 

Board concurs with this determination.

Enclosed is supporting documentation from the February 23-25, 2011 Board 

meeting held in Augusta, Georgia, and earlier meetings where this potential 

class for the SEC was discussed. If any of these items are unavailable at this 

time, they will follow shortly. 

 Sincerely,

 [Signature on file]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
Exhibit 10.1

 



December 2,   2015 CALIFORNIA Land Department RESOURCES CORPORATION 111 West Ocean Blvd.,   Suite 800 Long Beach. CA 90802 W. Shane Jones Reef Oil & Gas   Companies 1901 N. Central Expressway, Suite 300 Richardson. TX 75080 Re:   Offer to Purchase Oil. Gas and Mineral Interest Wilmington Oil Field, Long   Beach Unit - Reef’ Partners Income & Dev II - Reef Income &   Development III Dear Mr. Jones, Pursuant to your discussions with Bob   Grundstorm our VP of Planning and New Ventures, I am writing to you on   behalf of California Resources Long Beach, Inc. (“CRC”). CRC is the   operator of certain portions of the Wilmington Oil Field in Los Angeles   County, California. This letter constitutes CRC’s offer to purchase the   interests in the oil, gas and minerals and your Unit Participation in the   Long Beach Unit of Reef Partners Income & Dev II Reef and Reef   Income & Development III (collectively, “REEF”). CRC’s offer is for   the sum of S 1,000,000.00 for REEF’s 0.186253% interest in the Long Beach   Unit. This offer is subject to verification of REEF’s ownership interest and.   if needed, obtaining a release of any mortgage, lien or other encumbrance on   the interest and any title curative we may determine is appropriate to insure   that REEF has clear title to the interest. This offer shall remain open for   seven (7) clays from the date of this letter after which time it will   become null and void. CRC has the approvals, funding and resources available   to complete this acquisition on or before December 31”, 2015 and is   committed to working diligently to execute this transaction in a timely   manner. If this is acceptable, please sign and return the attached ACCEPTANCE   OF OFFER TO PURCHASE form. CRC will provide our form Quitclaim Deed for your   review at that time. Respectfully, Cambria Rivard Land Negotiator California   Resources Long Beach. Inc.


    




 










ACCEPTANCE OF   OFFER TO PURCHASE I, Reef Partners Income & Dev II Reef and Reef   Income & Development III, hereby accept and agree to sell to   California Resources Long Beach. Inc., my 0.186253’ right. title, and   interest in the Long Beach Unit, together with all oil, gas, and minerals   lying within or that may he produced from said lands within the Long Beach   Unit. The sales price is agreed to be $1,000,000.00. Name: Reef Income &   Development Fund II and III, L.P. Signature: Printed Name: Michael J. Nauceli   Phone Number: ###-## -#### E-mail: sjones@reefogc.com Address: 1901 N.   Central Expressway, Ste. 300 Richardson, TX 75070 Please return form to:   Cambria Rivard California Resources Long Beach. Inc. I I I W. Ocean Blvd. 8th   Floor Long Beach, CA 90802 Cambria.Rivard@crc.com
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Eltek Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Arieh Reichart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Arieh Reichart *
Arieh ReichartChief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

June 27, 2007

*     The
originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys
offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.



---

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5926 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5926

    To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
      guidelines for prescribing naloxone, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2018

  Mr. Keating (for himself and Mr. Rothfus) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
      guidelines for prescribing naloxone, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Naloxone Guidelines Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. GUIDELINES FOR PRESCRIBING NALOXONE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
issue guidelines for prescribing an opioid overdose reversal drug.
    (b) Contents.--In issuing guidelines under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall address the following:
            (1) Co-prescribing an opioid overdose reversal drug in 
        conjunction with any prescribed opioid.
            (2) Dosage safety.
            (3) Prescribing an opioid overdose reversal drug to an 
        individual other than a patient.
            (4) Standing orders.
            (5) Other distribution, education, and safety measures as 
        determined necessary.
                                 <all>
```