alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ronald
Williams, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of DRC Ventures, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of DRC Ventures,
Inc.





Date: May 14, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Ronald WilliamsRonald
      WilliamsChief
      Executive Officer,Principal
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form
10-Q of EcoEmissions Solutions Inc. for the Quarter Ended May 31, 2010, I, Larry
Lorenz, President and Chief Executive Officer of EcoEmissions Solutions, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

|1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended
      May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q for the Period Ended May 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      EcoEmissions Solutions Inc.

|By: | /s/ Larry
      Lorenz                     
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | Larry Lorenz                               
|    | President and Chief Executive
      Officer

Dated: July 15, 2010

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

PETE McNEIL,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cv206/RS-WCS

CHARLES DUNHAM and JORDAN

CARRIERS, INC.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Motion For Continuance (Doc. 20). The attorneys filed

their joint report (Doc. 14) on June 13, 2011, which proposed September 16, 2011, for

completion of all discovery and trial in November 2011. Defendants’ counsel now

raises the specter of discovery of two and half decades of over fifty health care

providers and a truly astounding number of possible other accidents. Surely, this

prospect of seemingly endless discovery has not now just been discovered. This

should have been apparent within the first days after Plaintiff’s deposition and other

initial discovery responses. It is unlikely that it will be necessary to conduct discovery of

Plaintiff’s medical history for decades in the past. Discovery of Plaintiff’s medical

history over recent years immediately preceding and after the accident in question is

likely to be more relevant and provide an accurate picture of Plaintiff’s physical

condition immediately before and since the accident. This is a motor vehicle case; it is

not rocket science. An apt description of the difference between a real trial lawyer and

a litigator is if a litigator is told to fetch a rock from the middle of the field, the litigator will

Case 4:11-cv-00206-RS-WCS Document 21 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 2
plow every furrow in the field before retrieving the rock. A real trial lawyer will walk the

most immediate route across the field to the rock and return directly with it. The

attorneys have provided no explanation of what they have done to date to diligently and

efficiently prepare this case and no prediction when this case could ever be ready for

trial with the odyssey of discovery they propose.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. All discovery shall be completed not later that December 2, 2011.

2. This case is scheduled for jury trial in Panama City on March 12, 2012, at

8:30 a.m.

3. Counsel shall file not later than September 30, 2011, an amended joint

report with deadlines consistent with this Order.

ORDERED on September 22, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00206-RS-WCS Document 21 Filed 09/22/11 Page 2 of 2
# Diario Oficial L 124/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0685 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | L 124 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Legislación | 59.° año13 de mayo de 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0685

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

L 124

Edición en lengua española

Legislación

59.° año13 de mayo de 2016

---

| Sumario | | II   Actos no legislativos | Página |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACUERDOS INTERINSTITUCIONALES |
| | * | Declaración del Parlamento Europeo y de la Comisión con ocasión de la adopción del Acuerdo interinstitucional sobre la mejora de la legislación de 13 de abril de 2016 | 1 |

Sumario

II   Actos no legislativos

Página

ACUERDOS INTERINSTITUCIONALES

*

Declaración del Parlamento Europeo y de la Comisión con ocasión de la adopción del Acuerdo interinstitucional sobre la mejora de la legislación de 13 de abril de 2016

1

| ES | Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres finos son actos de gestión corriente, adoptados en el marco de la política agraria, y que tienen generalmente un período de validez limitado.
  Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres gruesos y precedidos de un asterisco son todos los demás actos. |
| --- | --- |

ES

Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres finos son actos de gestión corriente, adoptados en el marco de la política agraria, y que tienen generalmente un período de validez limitado.

Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres gruesos y precedidos de un asterisco son todos los demás actos.

---

II Actos no legislativos

ACUERDOS INTERINSTITUCIONALES

| 13.5.2016 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | L 124/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2016

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

L 124/1

---

DECLARACIÓN DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO Y DE LA COMISIÓN CON OCASIÓN DE LA ADOPCIÓN DEL ACUERDO INTERINSTITUCIONAL SOBRE LA MEJORA DE LA LEGISLACIÓN DE 13 DE ABRIL DE 2016

El Parlamento Europeo y la Comisión consideran que el Acuerdo (1) refleja el equilibrio entre las respectivas competencias del Parlamento Europeo, el Consejo y la Comisión según lo establecido en el Tratado.

1

No afecta a lo dispuesto en el Acuerdo Marco de 20 de octubre de 2010 sobre las relaciones entre el Parlamento Europeo y la Comisión Europea (2).

2

---

(1)  
  DO L 123 de 12.5.2016, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  DO L 304 de 20.11.2010, p. 47.

2

---
<PAGE>   1

                             Amscan Holdings, Inc.
                        Ratio of income to fixed charges
                       (in thousands, except ratio data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                1997            1996           1995          1994            1993
                                                               -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
<S>                                                            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings:
Income before taxes and minority interests                     $ 7,676        $ 5,732        $19,206        $10,591        $ 9,104
Add: Fixed charges                                               6,512          8,735          6,874          4,719          3,358
                                                               -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
Earnings, as adjusted                                          $14,188        $14,467        $26,080        $15,310        $12,462
                                                               =======        =======        =======        =======        =======

Computation of fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                             $ 4,231        $ 6,968        $ 6,025        $ 3,971        $ 2,711
  Interest portion of rent expense                               2,281          1,767            849            748            647
                                                               -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
    Total fixed charges                                        $ 6,512        $ 8,735        $ 6,874        $ 4,719        $ 3,358
                                                               =======        =======        =======        =======        =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                 2.2 x          1.7 x          3.8 x          3.2 x          3.7 x
</TABLE>
Dismissed; Opinion Filed July 1, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00154

- CV

GARTH MCCREATH , Appellant

V. CAPITOL STONEBRIAR , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 00272

- 2019


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Nowell The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are p ast due. By postcard

dated February 5, 2019, w e notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant
to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated February 5, 2019, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further

notice. By letter dated April 2, 2019, w e informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s rec ord or to provide written documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days . We– 2

–

cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appe llant ha s not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regard ing the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b) , (c).

190154F.P05 /Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

GARTH MCCREATH, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 00154

- CV V. CAPITOL STONEBRIAR, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 00272

- 2019. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. Justices Bridges and Brown participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee CAPITOL STONEBRIAR recover its costs of this appeal from appellant GARTH MCCREATH.

Judgment entered this 1 st day of July, 2019.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JOSEPH P. FRANKENBERRY,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DR. MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT AT S.C.I. 

BENNER; AND THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 342 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-30404 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEVEN W. ARNOLD,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-50017-ALL

--------------------

October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Steven W. Arnold appeals from the revocation of his

supervised release and his sentence to 24 months’ imprisonment. 

He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the

determination that he used and possessed controlled substances in

violation of one of the conditions of his supervised release;

that the district court erred by failing to consider whether the

availability of substance abuse programs warranted an exception

to mandatory revocation; and that the district court erred by
No. 02-30404

-2-

finding that his drug possession constituted a Grade C violation

instead of a Grade B violation and by imposing a 24-month term of

imprisonment. Arnold’s arguments are unconvincing. 

First, Arnold admitted at the revocation hearing that he

had used drugs. Arnold’s admission and the laboratory reports

were sufficient evidence for the district court to find that

he use and possessed illegal substances. See United States

v. McCormick, 54 F.3d 214, 226 (5th Cir. 1995). Second, the

district court’s comments at the revocation hearing and the

recommendation in the written judgment that Arnold be placed in

a facility where he could receive long-term drug treatment

constituted an implicit determination that the availability of

drug-treatment programs did not warrant an exception to the

mandatory revocation requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(1). 

Third, because Arnold previously had been convicted of a

drug-trafficking offense, his supervised release violation

was a Grade B violation, U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1(a)(2), p.s.; see

21 U.S.C. § 844(a), subjecting him to a recommended guideline

sentencing range of 18-24 months’ imprisonment. U.S.S.G.

§ 7B1.4(a), p.s. Arnold’s maximum statutory sentence for his

supervised release violation was 24 months’ imprisonment. 

18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); see 18 U.S.C. §§ 3146(b)(1)(A)(ii),

3559(a)(4). The 24-month term imposed on Arnold was within the

statutory sentencing range and the sentencing range recommended

by the policy statement and therefore was not in violation of law
No. 02-30404

-3-

or plainly unreasonable. United States v. Headrick, 963 F.2d

777, 779 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Net Savings Link, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, David Saltrelli, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 19th day of April, 2011.








DAVID SALTRELLIDavid SaltrelliChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
C.J. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 69703



# FILED MAY 2 3 2016
TRACE K LINDEMAN CLERy.,OF SUPREME COURT ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for leave to file recusal of District Judge Michael Villani. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David B. Barker, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. Hardesty Pickering

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Steven Samuel Braunstein Attorney GenerallCarson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ae /(0-1(tiogj ;7,
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'

The Board of Directors
Go2Net, Inc.:

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-63729) pertaining to the Go2Net, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan
and Silicon Investor, Inc. 1996 Stock Plan, the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-63725) pertaining to the registration of 1,295,536 shares of
Common Stock of Go2Net, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-76069) pertaining to the registration of 717,390 shares of Common Stock of
Go2Net, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-76071) pertaining to
the Go2Net, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan and Web21 Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-82765) pertaining to the Authorize.Net
Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, the Haggle Online, Inc. Stock Option
Agreement, and the IQC Corporation Stock Option Agreement, the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-82773) pertaining to the registration of 1,512,514
shares of Common Stock of Go2Net, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-86529) pertaining to registration of 686,900 shares of Common Stock of
Go2Net, Inc. of our report dated December 17, 1999 with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Go2Net, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
September 30, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1999, which report
appears in the September 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Go2Net, Inc. and
subsidiaries.

                                          KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
December 29, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Fellowship (F31) Applications on HIV/AIDS.                    

*Date:*                         April 29, 2008                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3039, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Abraham P. Bautista, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and  Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3039, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-9737,                         *bautista@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 28, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 08-962  Filed 3-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00379-CR

NO. 02-14-00380-CR

NO. 02-14-00381-CR

NO. 02-14-00382-CR

RODERICK DIXON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1352360D, 1352834D, 1352836D, 1376529W

------------

ORDER

------------

We have considered the appellant’s “First Motion For Extension Of Time In

Which To File Appellant’s Brief.”

The motion is GRANTED. The appellant’s brief is ordered due Monday,

May 11, 2015.

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the

attorneys of record.

FILE COPY
DATED March 11, 2015.

PER CURIAM

2

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Intraware, Inc.
                   Orinda, Ca

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-109969, 333-107881,
333-90442, 333-89566, 333-65112 and 333-53858) and Form S-8 (No. 333-53902, 333-93823, 333-74209 and 138270) of Intraware, Inc. of our report
dated April 24, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statement, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                   San Francisco, Ca

April 24, 2007

---