alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. C. Jones, *Admr., v.*M. C. Smithson *et al.*

(No. 8553)

Submitted October 12, 1937.

Decided November 9, 1937.

*Samuel Price*and *Love & Love,*for plaintiff in error.

*Robinson & Stump,*for defendants in error.

*390Hatcher, Judge:

This is an action in damages brought by the father and administrator of Robert Jones, an infant, for his wrongful death caused by the truck of defendant Smithson. A verdict and judgment was rendered for defendants.

The truck heavily loaded, was backed down a slight slope to within two or three feet of a building, where the truck’s emergency brake was set, the transmission placed in low gear and the engine stopped. A small quantity of coal was unloaded in which work Robert took some part. Preparatory to leaving, the truck’s gear was placed in neutral and immediately the truck “eased back” crushing Robert’s head against the building. Further details seem unnecessary since the questions of negligence and contributory negligence, if any, are so essentially jury questions.

Plaintiff complains because he was not permitted to ask the veniremen upon their *voir dire*examination if any of them were interested in a certain company which insured the defendant against damages arising from the operation of his truck. This was not error. See what is said thereon in *Adams*v. *Cline Ice Cream Company,*101 W. Va. 35, 131 S. E. 867.

Plaintiff further complains because his instruction No. 3 was rejected. That instruction stated purely abstract propositions of law, hence its refusal was not error. *Parker v*. *Nat. Mut. Bldg. & Loan Ass’n.,*55 W. Va. 134, 46 S. E. 811.

Plaintiff complains again because defendants’ instructions Nos. 2, 6 and 11 were given to the jury. No. 2 directed the jury to find for defendants if Robert was guilty of “some negligence” which “* * * contributed to the fatal accident.” Since the essential element of negligence, either primary or secondary, is its proximateness to the accident, this instruction is erroneous for omitting that qualification. *Willhide*v. *Biggs,*118 W. Va. 160, 188 S. E. 876. No. 6 has the same fault, only in lesser degree. No. 11 would have the defendants acquitted if the jury should believe from the evidence that the father directed Robert “to go behind the truck.” There is no evidence supporting this hypothesis, hence the instruction was erroneous.

*391The judgment is reversed, the verdict set aside and a new trial awarded the plaintiff.

*Judgment reversed; verdict set aside; new trial awarded.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Forbes Energy Services Ltd. filed on Form 10-Q (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Melvin Cooper, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ L. Melvin CooperL. Melvin CooperSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary


Date:
November 12, 2010
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directorsand Shareholders 

Nationwide Financial Services, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-102007) on Form S-3, (No. 333-52775) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-110628) on Form S-8 of Nationwide FinancialServices, Inc. of our reports dated March 1, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidatedstatements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and all related financial statement schedules (hereafter, financial statements), management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31,2006, annual report on Form 10-K of Nationwide Financial Services, Inc. Our report with respect to the financial statements refers to the Company’s adoption of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement ofPosition 03-1, *Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts,* in 2004. 

 

Columbus, Ohio 

March 1, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         The following table sets forth the subsidiaries of the Registrant and
the respective jurisdictions under which they were organized. Indirect
subsidiaries are included beneath the respective subsidiary through which they
are owned.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary Name                                                           Jurisdiction
---------------                                                           ------------
<S>                                                                       <C>
Udimet Special Metals Ltd.                                                United Kingdom

Special Metals Foreign Sales Corporation                                  Barbados

Special Metals Domestic Sales Corporation                                 Delaware


Inco Alloys International, Inc.  d.b.a. Huntington Alloys                 Delaware

         Daido Special Metals, Ltd.(1)                                    Japan

         Special Metals Pacific Pte. Ltd.                                 Singapore

         Inco Alloys Foreign Sales (1991) Corporation                     Barbados

         A-1 Wire Tech, Inc.                                              Illinois

         Controlled Products Group International, Inc.                    Delaware


SMW Holdings Ltd.                                                         United Kingdom

         Special Metals Wiggin Ltd.                                       United Kingdom

                  Special Metals Services Ltd.                            United Kingdom

                  Wiggin Alloy Products Ltd.(2)                           United Kingdom

                  Special Metals Services SpA                             Italy

                  Special Metals Wiggin Trustees Ltd.                     United Kingdom

                  Special Metals Services BV                              Netherlands

                  Special Metals Deutschland Ltd.                         United Kingdom

                  Greengrove Welding Wires Ltd.                           United Kingdom

                  Special Metals Services S.A.                            France

                  Incotherm Ltd.                                          United Kingdom

         Special Metals SARL                                              France

                  Rescal, S.A.                                            France

Huntington Alloys Canada Ltd.                                             Canada

         Spectech Alloys Ltd.   d.b.a. Controlled Products Group          Canada
</TABLE>


--------------------

(1)      A joint venture, 50% owned by Huntington Alloys

(2)      A joint venture, 50% owned by Special Metals Wiggin Ltd.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171096) and Amendment No. 319 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP














Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


December 23, 2015
* Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-8989. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. PARK 'N GO OF GA., INC., Defendant-Appellant. Aug. 29, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:93-cv-1541-JEC), Julie E. Carnes, Judge. Before HATCHETT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON * , Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM: Appellant Park 'N Go appealed the grant of summary judgment to United States Fidelity & Guaranty (USF & G), arguing the district court erroneously concluded that USF & G's liability was limited to $250,000 and therefore erroneously granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee. We—pursuant to Ga. Const. art. VI, § 6 para. 4; O.C.G.A. § 15-2-9; and Rule 37 of the Supreme Court of Georgia—certified to the Supreme Court of Georgia the question of USF & G's liability. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park 'N Go of Georgia, Inc., 66 F.3d 273 (11th Cir.1995). The Supreme Court has answered the certified question in the affirmative. Park 'N Go of Georgia, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 266 Ga. 787, 471 S.E.2d 500 (1996). In the light of the Supreme Court of Georgia's opinion, we affirm the decision of the district court.AFFIRMED.
Presidential Documents

11999 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 44 

Wednesday, March 5, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8223 of February 29, 2008 

Irish-American Heritage Month, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Since the earliest days of our Republic, Irish Americans have enriched 

our culture with their faith, values, and hard work. During the month 

of March, we celebrate the contributions of Americans who trace their ancestry back to Ireland’s shores. 

Many of the sons and daughters of Erin came to America fleeing famine 

and poverty. They came with dreams of opportunity, and they helped to 

build our democracy and advance the cause of liberty. Irish Americans 

in all walks of life have made lasting contributions to our Nation, and 

we honor the service of Irish Americans in America’s Armed Forces. Throughout our history, those claiming Irish ancestry have helped shape and strengthen America, including as signers of the Declaration of Independence and 

as Presidents of the United States. 

This month, we celebrate the patriotic and proud people who originated 

from the Emerald Isle and who have played a vital role in the story of 

this Nation of immigrants. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 2008 as IrishAmerican Heritage Month. I call upon all Americans to observe this month 

by celebrating the contributions of Irish Americans to our Nation. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES2
12000 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 5, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth 

day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 08–976 

Filed 3–4–08; 8:55 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24774-24775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-36 OTS Nos. 08193 and H4677]


Fairmount Bank, Baltimore, MD; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 15, 2010, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision approved the application of Fairmount Bank, Baltimore, 
Maryland, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the 
application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 
(202) 906-5922 or e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86bae7a6eef4e3e0bb" http: public.info">public.info</a>@ots.treas.gov">public.info@ots.treas.gov</a>) at the Public 
Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS 
Southeast Regional Office, 1475 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 
30309.

    Dated: April 27, 2010.


[[Page 24775]]


    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-10227 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Department of Health and Human Services

 

Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

1150 Tusculum Ave

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH. 

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D. 

 Madison, Wisconsin 

Josie Beach 

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson 

 Rexburg, Idaho 

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa 

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D. 

 New York, New York 

Richard Lemen, Ph.D. 

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D. 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

Wanda I. Munn 

 Richland, Washington 

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. 

 College Station, Texas 

David B. Richardson, Ph.D. 

 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D. 

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico 

Loretta R. Valerio 

 Santa Fe, New Mexico 

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

May 8, 2017

The Honorable Thomas E. Price, M.D.

Secretary 

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

 

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

completed its evaluation of Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00223 

concerning workers at the Carborundum Company facility on Buffalo 

Avenue, Niagara Falls, New York, under the statutory requirements 

established by the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000 and incorporated into 42 C.F.R. § 83.13.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for:

“All employees who worked in any area of the Carborundum 

Company facility on Buffalo Avenue, Niagara Falls, New York, 

from January 1, 1943, through December 31, 1976.” 

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and 

other information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with 

sufficient accuracy for members of this group, and therefore a class 

covering this group should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs 

with this determination.

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the March 22 and 

23, 2017, Board meeting held in Naperville, Illinois, the Board 

recommends that this class not be added to the SEC. 

Enclosed is the documentation from the Board meeting(s) where this SEC 

class was discussed. The documentation includes copies of the petition, 

the NIOSH review thereof, and related materials. If any of these items are 

unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

[Signature on File]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
Presidential Documents

10125 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 38 

Tuesday, February 26, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2008–12 of February 13, 2008 

Implementation of Sections 603 and 604 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107– 

228) 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Consistent with the authority contained in section 604 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–228)(the ‘‘Act’’), 

and with reference to the determinations set out in the report to be transmitted to the Congress pursuant to section 603 of that Act regarding noncompliance by the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian 

Authority with certain commitments, I hereby impose the sanction set out 

in section 604(a)(2), ‘‘Downgrade in Status of the PLO Office in the United 

States.’’ This sanction is imposed for a period of 180 days from the date 

hereof or until such time as the next report required by section 603 of 

the Act is transmitted to the Congress, whichever is later. You are authorized 

and directed to transmit to the appropriate congressional committees the 

report described in section 603 of the Act. 

Furthermore, I hereby determine that it is in the national security interest 

of the United States to waive that sanction, pursuant to section 604(c) 

of the Act. This waiver shall be effective for a period of 180 days from 

the date hereof or until such time as the next report required by section 

603 of the Act is transmitted to the Congress, whichever is later. 

You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination to 

the Congress and to publish it in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, February 13, 2008. 

[FR Doc. 08–869 

Filed 2–25–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRO1GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00350

- CR

Demario Reshod Talley aka Demario

Talley

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1507524D)

January 18, 2018

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordere d that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 34.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Housing Income Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeff Howard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)     The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2015

By: */s/ Jeff Howard*Name: Jeff HowardTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Frank
R. Ventura, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Wi-Max Communications,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I
have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and




c)
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;




5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):




a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: May
      24, 2010
              
              
              By:      /s/
      Frank R. Ventura
              ----------------------------------
              Frank
      R. Ventura
              Chief
      Financial Officer