alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 1, 2016

No. 04-16-00206-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.G.A. AND M.A.A., CHILDREN,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-PA-01023

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In this accelerated appeal of the March 22, 2016 order terminating Appellant’s parental 

rights, Appellant’s brief was due on May 5, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We granted 

Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief until May 26, 2016. On the due 

date, Appellant filed a second motion for extension of time to file the brief until June 9, 2016. 

See id. R. 38.6(d). 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on June 9, 2016. See id. 

Any further motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s brief will be disfavored. See

TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2, (directing courts of appeals to dispose of parental rights termination

suits “[w]ithin 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed”). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 

 National Institute for Occupational 

 Safety and Health 

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

 4676 Columbia Parkway 

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 

Phone: 513-533-6825 

Fax: 513-533-6826 

April 4, 2008 

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00092 

Peter M. Turcic, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

Room C-4511 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20210 

Dear Mr. Turcic: 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as 

required by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(c), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to 

designate a class of employees at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, 

as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational 

Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On March 3, 2008 as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 

7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the 

SEC: 

Employees of the Department of Energy (DOE), its predecessor agencies, and DOE 

contractors or subcontractors who were monitored for radiation exposure while 

working at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory from January 1, 1950, 

through December 31, 1973, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 

work days or in combination with work days within the parameters established for 

one or more classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on April 2, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384l(14)(C). 

Hence, beginning on April 2, 2008 members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this 

notice, became members of the SEC. 

 Sincerely, 

Larry J. Elliott 

 Director 

 Office of Compensation Analysis and Support 

 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Canistel Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2009 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: August 5, 2008
Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support 

Program Evaluation Report

Document Number: DCAS-PER-068 

Effective Date: 4/5/2016 

Revision No. 0

Electro Metallurgical Company Page 1 of 2 

Author: Signature on file 

Dave Allen, HP Team Leader

Date: 4/5/2016 

 

Supersedes: None

Approval: Signature on file 

J.W. Neton, Associate Director for Science

Date: 4/5/2016 

 

RECORD OF ISSUE/REVISIONS 

ISSUE EFFECTIVE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION

AUTHORIZATION DATE

DATE

New document to determine the effect of 

4/5/2016 4/5/2016 0 the revision to DCAS-TKBS-0007, 

(Electro Metallurgical Company) on 

previously completed claims.

 

1.0 Description 

Dose reconstructions for the claims from the Electro Metallurgical Company 

(ElectroMet) were originally performed using Appendix C of Battelle-TBD-6001 issued 

on 12/21/2007. Battelle-TBD-6001 was cancelled and Appendix C was converted to a 

standalone Technical Basis Document (TBD), DCAS-TKBS-0007. Revision 0 of this 

TBD was issued on 2/15/2011. Revision 1 was issued on 9/24/2015. This PER (DCASPER-068) evaluates the effect of revision 1 of the TBD on all previously completed 

claims. 

2.0 Issue Evaluation 

Revision 1 of DCAS-TKBS-0007 incorporated a Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) 

designation for the site through the end of 1947. The revision also incorporated a reevaluation of data and information as a result of the SEC review process. One change in 

the revision was an increase in the external photon dose rates for all years. That change 

resulted in an increased external dose estimate for all claims completed using an earlier 

version. Because of this, it was not necessary to itemize any other increases in dose or 

further breakdown the time periods affected. 

3.0 Plan for Resolution or Corrective Action 

To evaluate the effect of revision 1 of the TBD on all previously completed claims, a 

search was conducted for all completed claims with verified employment at ElectroMet 

that had a probability of causation (POC) of less than 50%. This search identified 63
Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support

Program Evaluation Plan

Document Number: DCAS-PER-068

Effective Date: 4/5/2016 Revision No. 0 Page 2 of 2

claims. Twenty five of these claims met the conditions for inclusion in the SEC and 

would no longer need a dose reconstruction to determine compensation. Therefore, those 

25 claims were removed from further evaluation. 

A new dose estimate was performed for the remaining 39 claims using revision 1 of the 

TBD, as well as all other applicable approved dose reconstruction methods. The 

resulting probability of causation (POC) was below 45% for 19 claims. The 20

remaining claim resulted in a POC greater than 52%. 

NIOSH will provide the Department of Labor with the list of all claims evaluated under 

this PER and request the return of those that would result in a POC greater than 50%.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending June 30, 2008 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   /s/ Anthony Pizzacalla ---------------------------------- Anthony Pizzacalla  President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director   Date: August 11, 2008
Exhibit 99.1
 
 News Release





Media Contacts :


Rajeev LalwaniJim BurkeInvestor RelationsMedia RelationsRajeev.Lalwani@L3Harris.comJim.Burke@L3Harris.com321-727-9383321-727-9131








L3Harris Releases Third Quarter 2022 Financial Results








MELBOURNE, Fla., October 27, 2022 — L3Harris Technologies (NYSE:LHX) today announced its third quarter fiscal year 2022 results in an Investor Letter , which was posted to the Investor Relations section of the company’s website.


As previously announced, the company will host an approximately 45 minute call on October 28, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. ET focused on questions and answers. The dial-in numbers for the teleconference are (U.S.) 877-407-6184 and (International) 201-389-0877 , and participants will be directed to an operator. Please allow at least 10 minutes before the scheduled start time to connect to the teleconference. Participants can also listen via webcast at L3Harris.com.


A recording of the call will be available on L3Harris.com beginning at approximately 12 p.m. ET on October 28.


About L3Harris Technologies L3Harris Technologies is an agile global aerospace and defense technology innovator, delivering end-to-end solutions that meet customers’ mission-critical needs. The company provides advanced defense and commercial technologies across space, air, land, sea and cyber domains. L3Harris has more than $17 billion in annual revenue and 47,000 employees, with customers in more than 100 countries. L3Harris.com.


# # #
Technical Documents Used in Dose Reconstruction 

A Closer Look at the Research Behind Your Claim 

Fact Sheets 

Q: When does NIOSH use technical documents in dose 

reconstruction? 

A: If the energy employee’s personal radiation information is incomplete, 

NIOSH will use other sources to estimate the radiation dose. This may 

involve using technical documents called Site Profiles, Technical Basis 

Documents, and Technical Information Bulletins. 

Q: 

A: 

What are Site Profi les? 

Site Profiles are documents that describe a specific work site. A Site Profile 

includes the physical appearance and layout of the site, the work processes 

used there, the types of materials used, potential sources of radiation, and 

other details important at that site. 

Q: 

A: 

What are Technical Basis Documents? 

Technical Basis Documents (also called TBDs) are the individual documents 

that form a Site Profile. An individual TBD contains information on a specific 

aspect of the site. This aspect may be the physical layout of the site, the 

work processes used, or other particular features of the site and the work 

performed there. 

Q: 

A: 

What are Technical Information Bulletins? 

Technical Information Bulletins (also called TIBs) contain information on 

specific technical issues or procedures for estimating radiation exposure. 

They are used to add to or supplement TBDs and Site Profiles. TIBs may be 

used for a specific site or multiple sites. 

Contact Information on Back ➜
 
 

For more information on technical documents 

or to see example documents, visit 

www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas 

E-mail questions to: dcas@cdc.gov

or call 1-877-222-7570 

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-140 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Exhibit 23

 

[KPMG LLP letterhead] 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 

 

To the Trustees of Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-18809, 333-18809-01, and 333-18809-04 on Form S-3 of HawaiianElectric Industries, Inc., Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I, and HEI Preferred Funding, LP and Registration Statement Nos. 333-18809-02 and 333-113120-02 on Form S-3 of Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust II and RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-18809-03 and 333-113120-01 on Form S-3 of Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust III of our report dated February 11, 2004, except as to note 5, which is as of March 16, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets ofHawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year periodended December 31, 2003, which report appears in this 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust I. 

 

Our report refers to a change in accounting method for variable interest entities. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Honolulu Hawaii 

March 17, 2004
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Media Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  May 14, 2010




By:          /s/Dean Li


Dean Li


President, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.3
AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO 
UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


This instrument is Amendment No. 4 (this “Amendment”), dated as of September 30, 2015 to the Unsecured Promissory Note dated as of September 17, 2010 (the “Promissory Note”) issued by American Power Group, Inc. (formerly GreenMan Technologies, Inc.) (the “Company”) to Charles E. Coppa (the “Holder”). Terms used in this Amendment without definition which are defined in the Promissory Note have the same meanings in this Amendment as in the Promissory Note unless otherwise provided herein.    
    
WHEREAS, the Company has previously issued the Promissory Note to the Holder and amended the Promissory Note on April 27, 2012, April 30, 2014 and again on September 24, 2014 ;


WHEREAS, the Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect with this Amendment No. 4; and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder now desire to further amend the Promissory Note; 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, the Company and the Holder, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	The first paragraph of the Promissory Note is hereby amended by:




		
	(a)
	deleting the reference to “the second anniversary of the Closing (as defined below)” therein and replacing it with “payable in 5 monthly payments of $10,000 commencing January 15, 2016 and ending May 15, 2016”;




2.    The Holder waives any prior default under the Promissory Note.


3.    Except as otherwise amended by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect. 


4.    This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 





























IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.








                                                             AMERICAN POWER GROUP CORPORATION
        


By:  ___________________
Maury Needham
Chairman




HOLDER:


         _____________________
        Charles E. Coppa
Exhibit
      32.2











STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of China Fruits Corp. (the
      "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Huang, Xiao Yun, our Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





CHINA
                FRUITS
                CORPORATION
              (Registrant)Date: April
                14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Huang,
                Xiao
                YunHuang,
                Xiao Yun
              Chief
                Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES W. CRISE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 88 and 89 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of GMS Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ George MetrakosGeorge Metrakos

Chief Executive Officer





Dated: August 12, 2010
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSIAH ENGLISH III, 

PlaintiffAppellant, 

 v. 

HOUSE, First Name Unknown; et al., 

DefendantsAppellees, 

and 

HUGHES, First Name Unknown; et al., 

Defendants.

No. 20-15969 

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01087-GMS-JZB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 28 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-15969 

Josiah English III appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from 

the violation of his attorney-client privilege. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. 

Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed English’s action because English failed 

to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 

338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a 

plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for 

relief); see also Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 317-19, 325 (1981) (a 

private attorney or a public defender does not act under color of state law within 

the meaning of § 1983); Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978) 

(municipal liability under § 1983 requires execution of policy or custom that 

inflicts plaintiff’s constitutional injury); Partington v. Gedan, 961 F.2d 852, 863 

(9th Cir. 1992) (attorney-client privilege is not a constitutional right except in the 

criminal context under the Sixth Amendment; a plaintiff must show that he was 

“substantially prejudiced”).

AFFIRMED.
|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF                                   
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                        
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                            
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                             
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002      

I, Morgan Magella, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Midex Gold Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  





| |        |                            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Morgan Magella         
| | Name:  | Morgan Magella             
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | June 15, 2010              













|
|
|