alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2009
    By:
    /s/ KELLY ANDERSONKELLY ANDERSONExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Yong Qing Ma, the Chief Financial Officer of SINO GREEN LAND CORPORATION (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 17thday of May, 2010.

/s/ Yong Qing MaYong Qing Ma
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sino Green Land Corporation and will be retained by Sino Green Land Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
----

----

|   | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vida Life International, Ltd. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vida Life International, Ltd. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                    |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                   |   |                    |   |
| Dated: August 13, 2009 | By:    | /s/ John C. Jordan |   |
|                   |   | John C. Jordan          |   |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |   |                    |   |

|                   | Company Name |                        |
|------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------|
|                   |         |                        |   |
| Dated: August 13, 2009 | By:          | /s/ John C. Jordan     |   |
|                   |         | John C. Jordan              |   |
|                   |         | Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                   |         |                        |   |

----

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of As Seen On TV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date:  August 14, 2012

| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                      
| |                                                      
| | /s/ DENNIS W, HEALEY                                 
| | Dennis W. Healey                                     
| | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to As Seen On TV, Inc. and will be retained by As Seen On TV, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-428-CR

EX PARTE 

QUILLENS EDWIN STEVENS, JR.	

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Quillens Edwin Stevens, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s November 20, 2006 denial of relief on his application for writ of habeas corpus seeking a bond reduction pending appeal of his conviction and sentence under article 44.04(d) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.2

	Article 44.04(d) provides that a postconviction bond may be increased or decreased “pending determination of any motion for new trial or pending final determination of the appeal.”3  This court affirmed Appellant’s conviction and sentence on August 3, 2006,4 and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refused Appellant’s petition for review on November 1, 2006 and finally disposed of the case on December 11, 2006.  There is therefore no pending appeal on Appellant’s conviction and sentence.  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot.5

								PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	DAUPHINOT, LIVINGSTON, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  February 8, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JOSEPH P. FRANKENBERRY,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DR. MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT AT S.C.I. BENNER; AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 342 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
THE MUNICIPAL FUND ACCUMULATION PROGRAM, INC.

FILE # 811-2694

ATTACHMENT 77O
amco20151214_s8.htm




 

EXHIBIT 4.1

 

 

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO ARMCO METALS HOLDINGS, INC.’S

AMENDED AND RESTATED

2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Armco Metals Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) previously approved and adopted the Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by linking the personal interests of the Plan’s participants to those of the Company’s stockholders and by providing such individuals with an incentive for outstanding performance in order to help grow the Company and to generate superior returns to its shareholders. By this Amendment, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares available under the Plan.

 

1.     Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.

 

2.     The effective date of this Amendment to the Plan shall be November 6, 2015, upon the stockholders’ approval.

 

3.     Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

4.1     Number of Shares Available for Awards

 

“Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 17 hereof, the number of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be no greater than 1,800,000 shares of Stock, all of which may be granted as Incentive Stock Options. Stock issued or to be issued under the Plan shall be authorized but unissued shares; or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company.”

 

4.     This Amendment shall amend only the provisions of the Plan as set forth herein. Those provisions of the Plan not expressly amended hereby shall be considered in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative on this 6th day of November, 2015.

 

 

	  	
Armco Metals Holdings, Inc.

	  	
By: /s/ Kexuan Yao

	  	
Kexuan Yao, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION









<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bedrock Energy,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2009 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Herbert
T. Sears,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Principal  Accounting  Officer,  of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 6, 2009


Name: Herbert Sears

/s/Herbert T. Sears
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: (Chief Financial Officer/Principal
Accounting Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
           THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
THE  BALANCE  SHEET  OF SAVE ON MEDS . NET AS OF JULY 31,  2000 AND THE  RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Propell Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward L.
Bernstein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.  /s/ Edward L.
BernsteinEdward L. Bernstein
President, Chief Executive Officer and 
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  Dated: May 11, 2011
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

SEC Tracking Number: SEC00207 

Ms. Rachel Leiton, Director 

Division of Energy Employees Occupational 

 Illness Compensation 

U.S. Department of Labor 

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room C-3321 

Washington, District of Columbia 20210 

Dear Ms. Leiton:

National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health

Robert A. Taft Laboratories

4676 Columbia Parkway

Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998

Phone: 513-533-6825

Fax: 513-533-6826

January 7, 2013 

On behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and as required 

by 42 C.F.R. § 83.17(d), I am notifying you of the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a 

class of employees from the Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio, as an addition to the Special 

Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000. On December 7, 2012, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. § 7384q(b), the Secretary of 

HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC: 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors 

and subcontractors who worked at the Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio, from September 1, 

1972, through December 31, 1972, or from January 1, 1975, through December 31, 1976, for 

a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this 

employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or 

more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort. 

This designation became effective on January 6, 2013, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 

§7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on January 6, 2013, members of this class of employees, defined as 

reported in this notice, became members of the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

[Signature on File] 

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130830 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130830 COA: 258097 Wayne CC: 04-004613-01 ANDRE DAMON HILMON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) 

A Closer Look at the Research Behind Your Claim 

Fact Sheet 

Q: 

A: 

What is the SEC? 

The SEC is a category of employees established by the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA). It 

consists of employees who worked at least 250 days prior to February 1, 

1992, at one of the gaseous diffusion plants in Kentucky, Ohio, or 

Tennessee, or who participated in certain specific underground nuclear 

tests in Alaska and have any of the 22 specified cancers. A group of 

employees may be added to the cohort because HHS could not do dose 

reconstructions with sufficient accuracy and the exposure could have 

harmed the class. 

Q: 

A: 

Can other groups of employees and worksites be 

added to the SEC? 

Yes, other groups of employees and work sites can be considered for 

addition to the SEC through a petition process run by NIOSH on behalf of 

the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

Q: 

A: 

Where can I get information on how to submit a petition? 

To obtain more information go to the NIOSH Web site at 

www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas, or contact NIOSH by phone at 1–800–35–NIOSH 

(1–800–356–4674). 

Q: 

A: 

How much money can I receive if I am a member of the SEC? 

$150,000 per qualified energy employee and, in some cases, certain 

medical expenses. 

Q: 

A: 

What are the requirements for me to receive compensation? 

The energy employee must have worked for a specified period of time at 

one of the SEC work sites. For a list of current SEC sites visit 

www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas. The energy employee must also have developed 

one of the 22 eligible cancers. 

The back page of this fact sheet lists the 22 eligible cancers. 

Contact Information on Back ➜
 
 

 

 

 

 

Q: What are the 22 eligible cancers? 

A: • Bone Cancer 

• 	 Renal Cancers 

• 	 Lung cancer (other than in-situ lung cancer that is discovered during or 

after a post-mortem exam) 

If the onset of the disease was at least 2 years after first exposure: 

• 	 Leukemia (other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia) 

If the onset of the disease was at least 5 years after first exposure: 

• 	 Multiple myeloma 

• 	 Lymphomas (other than Hodgkin’s disease) 

• 	 Primary cancer of the 

Bile ducts	 Pharynx Gall bladder 

Brain Salivary gland Liver 

Breast (female) (except if cirrhosis or Small intestine

Breast (male) hepatitis B is indicated) Stomach 

Colon Ovary Thyroid 

Esophagus Pancreas Urinary bladder 

For more information or to submit a petition for the SEC, visit 

www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas
 

E-mail questions to: dcas@cdc.gov 

or call 1-877-222-7570

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005–143 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
­
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10441

Summary Calendar

 

FRED SCOTT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TIM CURRY, Criminal District Attorney

for Tarrant County Texas in his Official 

Capacity; MR. THORTON, Judge, Official Capacity;

JACK STRICKLAND, Attorney in his Official

Capacity; DON CARPENTER, Official Capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:01-CV-916-Y

--------------------

August 8, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Fred Scott, Texas prisoner # 907987, appeals the dismissal

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to

state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. Scott argues

that the district court erred in dismissing his claims against

the defendants because he has satisfied the requirements of Heck

v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Scott’s claims for damages
No. 02-10441

-2-

against these defendants fail as a matter of law. Scott’s claims

against Judge Thorton in his official capacity are barred by the

Eleventh Amendment. See Warnock v. Pecos County, Texas, 88 F.3d

341, 343 (5th Cir. 1996). Scott’s claims against Carpenter and

Curry in their official capacity fail because he has not alleged

that an official policy or custom of Tarrant County resulted in

the violation of his constitutional rights. See Baker v. Putnal,

75 F.3d 190, 195 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Piotrowski v. City of

Houston, 237 F.3d 567, 578 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct.

53 (2001). Finally, because Scott failed to provide any factual

support for his conspiracy allegations, the district court did

not err in dismissing his claims against Strickland, a private

attorney. See Marts v. Hines, 68 F.3d 134, 136 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Scott also argues that the district court erred in

dismissing his claims for prospective or injunctive relief

against the defendants. Because Scott failed to show that Heck

should not be used to bar his claims for prospective relief, the

district court did not err in dismissing those claims. See Heck,

512 U.S. at 486-87.

To the extent that Scott attempts to state a claim against

the defendants for intentional infliction of emotional distress,

we do not address that claim because it was raised for the first

time on appeal. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co., 183 F.3d

339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.