alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of H&H Imports, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 16, 2010

| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                      
| |                                                      
| | /s/ STEVEN ROGAI                                     
| | Steven Rogai                                         
| | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 31, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00268-CV CRYSTAL HENRY, Appellant V. CARLA MORIEL, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-00329-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burn s, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Carlyle Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue . After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record , we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by July 10, 2024. By postcard dated July 12, 2024, we info rmed appellant her brief was overdue and directed appellant to file a brief with in ten days. We ca utioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a br ief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the stat us of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

240268F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT CRYSTAL HENRY, Appellant
No. 05-24-00268-CV V. CARLA MORIEL, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-00329- B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Pedersen, III and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered July 31, 2024
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARVELLOUS A. GREENE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

J. JONES, Lieutenant, CCI; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-15414

D.C. No. 1:08-CV-00677-CRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Marvellous A. Greene, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that strip

searches conducted at California Correctional Institution (“CCI”) violated his

FILED

MAR 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
DS/Research 2 09-15414

constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000), and we vacate and

remand.

The district court’s February 12, 2009 order of dismissal evaluates only

Greene’s original complaint, although Greene filed a first amended complaint on

June 23, 2008. See Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997)

(“[An] amended complaint supercedes the original, the latter being treated

thereafter as non-existent.”). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand for

further proceedings. 

On remand, the district court should provide Greene leave to file a second

amended complaint, after apprising him of the deficiencies in the original and

amended complaints and the requirement that an amended complaint be complete

in and of itself. We also draw the district court’s attention to Greene’s claim that

Muslim inmates at CCI were singled-out for strip searches, whereas inmates of

other religions were not.

Greene shall bear his own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
CDSI Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Richard J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





January
31, 2011


/s/ Richard J. LampenRichard
      J. LampenPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6946

BRUCE W. KOENIG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; RODNEY RODERICK; JOHN 

WHITE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:13-cv-03801-JFM)

Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Wayne Koenig, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce W. Koenig appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Koenig 

v. Md. Div. of Corr., No. 1:13-cv-03801-JFM (D. Md. filed June 

8, 2015 & entered June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### State of West Virginia *v.*James Clinton Christian Burks

(No. 14113)

Decided July 15, 1980.

*410
      *Lee H. Adler*for petitioner.

*Chauncey H. Browning,*Attorney General, *Thomas N. Trent,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by James Clinton Christian Burks from his conviction by a jury in the Circuit Court of Raleigh County of third degree sexual assault and subsequent sentence of one to five years in the penitentiary. He alleges, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain his conviction; the State confesses that error was committed in that: (1) the victim of the alleged crime failed to appear at trial to testify against the defendant and (2) there was no evidence presented on lack of consent, force, or mental capacity necessary to sustain a guilty verdict under the indictment as drawn. We agree.

Petitioner was indicted for sexual assault on his seventy-two year old stepmother Arlie Mae Burks, by forcible compulsion, which is one of the elements of both first and second degree sexual assault. He was found guilty of assault in the third degree which requires in part for a finding of guilt, that one engage “in sexual intercourse with another person who is incapable of consent because he is mentally defective or mentally incapacitated.”

Because there was insufficient evidence of the alleged victim’s lack of consent or mental incapacity to consent to support the third degree sexual assault charge, and there was no evidence of force to sustain the charge of *411assault as drawn in the indictment, the conviction must be set aside.

Syllabus Point 1 of *State v. Starkey,*161 W.Va. 517, 244 S.E.2d 219 (1978) states:

> “In a criminal case, a verdict of guilt will not be set aside on the ground that it is contrary to the evidence, where the state’s evidence is sufficient to convince impartial minds of the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence is to be viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution. To warrant interference with a verdict of guilt on the ground of insufficiency of evidence, the court must be convinced that the evidence was manifestly inadequate and that consequent injustice has been done.”

Because there is an acknowledged insufficiency of evidence to support the conviction of the defendant, the Double Jeopardy Clause forbids a retrial and results in a judgment of acquittal as we have stated in Syllabus Point 3 of *State v. Milam,*163 W.Va. 752, 260 S.E.2d 295 (1979):

> *“*‘The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Federal and this State’s Constitutions forbids a second trial for the purpose of affording the prosecution another opportunity to supply evidence which it failed to muster in the first proceeding.’ Syllabus Point 4, *State v. Frazier,*_ W.Va. _, 252 S.E.2d 39 (1979).”

For the reasons set forth above the judgment of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County is reversed and the case is remanded for a judgment of acquittal.

*Reversed and remanded.*
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5899 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize school-based health 

centers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2018 

Mr. FASO (for himself, Mr. UPTON, Mr. SARBANES, and Mr. TONKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize 

school-based health centers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School-Based Health 

5 Centers Reauthorization Act of 2018’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5899 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH 

2 CENTERS. 

3 Section 399Z–1(l) of the Public Health Service Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 280h–5(l)) is amended by striking ‘‘2010 

5 through 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2018 through 2023’’. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5791 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5791

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9609 South University Boulevard in Highlands Ranch, Colorado, as the 
``Deputy Sheriff Zackari Spurlock Parrish, III, Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPUTY SHERIFF ZACKARI SPURLOCK PARRISH, III, POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9609 South University Boulevard in Highlands Ranch, 
Colorado, shall be known and designated as the ``Deputy Sheriff Zackari 
Spurlock Parrish, III, Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Deputy 
Sheriff Zackari Spurlock Parrish, III, Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5791

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9609 South University Boulevard in Highlands Ranch, Colorado, as the 
``Deputy Sheriff Zackari Spurlock Parrish, III, Post Office Building''.
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
				  to 
			 Certificate Holders

			 Scheduled        Unscheduled                Ending
Class        Interest     Pricipal          Principal               Balance
<S>     <C>             <C>             <C>                  <C>

A1         1,757,112.59      187,995.13      808,798.36       93,051,506.51 
A2            23,489.37        2,514.18            0.00        1,251,085.83 
APO                0.00        1,077.00       15,567.84          455,861.00 
AR                 6.46           71.01           28.99                0.00 
M             32,884.36        3,519.76            0.00        1,751,480.24 
B1            28,181.25        3,016.37            0.00        1,500,983.63 
B2             9,406.24        1,006.79            0.00          500,993.21 
B3             4,684.38          501.39            0.00          249,498.61 
B4             3,766.24          403.12            0.00          200,596.88 
B5             5,647.82          527.93            0.00          300,813.09 
    
Total      1,865,178.71      200,632.68      824,395.19  





</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Adelphia Recovery Trust (the “Trust”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jeffrey A. Brodsky, a member of Quest Turnaround Advisors, LLC, TrustAdministrator of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Trust.

 

 
| By:  Quest Turnaround Advisors, LLC                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| as  Trust Administrator of the Adelphia Recovery Trust |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/  Jeffrey A. Brodsky                                |   |
| Jeffrey  A. Brodsky                                    |   |
| Member                                                 |   |
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| Date: November 12, 2010                           |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5741 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5741

To require annual reporting on the on the research, development, test, 
       and evaluation capabilities of the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2018

 Mr. Krishnamoorthi (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Khanna, 
 and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require annual reporting on the on the research, development, test, 
       and evaluation capabilities of the Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Research and Development 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORT ON RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 
              CAPABILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    (a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, and on an annual basis thereafter, the Secretary 
of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the 
Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the research, 
development, test, and evaluation capabilities of the Department of 
Defense.
    (b) Elements.--Each report required by subsection (a) shall 
include, with respect to the research, development, test, and 
evaluation capabilities of the Department of Defense, the following:
            (1) A comparison of the capabilities of the Department 
        versus the capabilities of adversaries of the United States.
            (2) Identification of specific areas, if any, in which the 
        capabilities of the Department are at risk of falling behind 
        the capabilities of other nations.
            (3) An explanation of how the capabilities of the 
        Department are affected by budget sequestration and the use of 
        continuing resolutions to fund the Federal Government.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 10, 2008 pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), BioNanomatrix-Complete Genomics NIST ATP Joint Venture has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the partes and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: BioNanomatrix, Inc., Philadelphia, PA; and Complete Genomics, Inc., Mountain View, CA. The general area of planned activity for BioNanomatrix-Complete Genomics NIST ATP Joint Venture is to research the feasibility of sequencing the entire human genome in less than 8 hours for less than $100 using breakthrough technology called Linear Imaging Sequence Analysis (LISA) which requires the use of a novel sequence interrogation chemistry developed from CGI's ligation sequencing chemistry combined with a novel nanofluidic biochip adapted from BNM's nanoanalyzer technology.

The activities of this venture project will be partially funded by an award from the Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce under Award Number 70NANB7H7027.

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 08-755 Filed 2-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-11-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of AGY Holding Corp. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas J. Mattscheck            
|Douglas J. Mattscheck                
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

Dated: November 12, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AGY Holding Corp. and will be retained by AGY Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5886 

To apply the Bank Secrecy Act to dealers in art or antiquities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2018 

Mr. MESSER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To apply the Bank Secrecy Act to dealers in art or 

antiquities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Illicit Art and Antiq5 uities Trafficking Prevention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF BANK SECRECY ACT TO DEALERS 

7 IN ART OR ANTIQUITIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5312(a)(2) of title 31, 

9 United States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) in subparagraph (Y), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

11 the end; 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5886 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (Z), by striking the period 

2 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(AA) dealers in art or antiquities.’’. 

5 (b) RULEMAKING.—Not later than the end of the 

6 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment 

7 of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue regu8 lations to carry out the amendments made by subsection 

9 (a). 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 5312(a)(2)(AA) of 

11 title 31, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), 

12 shall take effect after the end of the 270-day period begin13 ning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS