alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5772 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5772

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Courthouse in 
Amarillo, Texas, as the ``J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou 
                  Robinson United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Courthouse located at 205 
SE 5th Ave., Amarillo, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``J. 
Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou Robinson United States 
Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou Robinson United 
States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201

NOV 2 0 2006

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

Chairman

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health
4676 Columbia Parkway, Mailstop C-46
Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

Dear Dr. Ziemer:

Thank you for your letter on behalf of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health
(the Board) regarding a report on the Board’s independent review of radiation dose
reconstructions completed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
as required by the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000.

I appreciate receiving the Board’s summary report and conclusions based on an audit of 20
dose reconstruction reports. I have forwarded the Board’s report to NIOSH for review and
consideration as they continue to improve this program.

Again, | appreciate the Board’s diligent efforts, commitment, and thoughtful advice. Please
let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Michael O. Leavitt
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6059 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2018 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 51 Willow Street in Lynn, Massachusetts, 

as the ‘‘Thomas P. Costin, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6059 RDS

1 SECTION 1. THOMAS P. COSTIN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 51 Willow Street in Lynn, Mas5 sachusetts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas 

6 P. Costin, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Thomas P. Costin, 

11 Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MYO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. DATED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         240,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,253
<PP&E>                                           7,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,891,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          655,224
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,229,435
<OTHER-SE>                                     960,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (1,891,394)
<SALES>                                          9,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  761,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (790,893)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (793,195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
1Circuit Judge of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________________________

No. 99-11249

___________________________

CHESTER COX, JR.; D. CLARK; PAULINE CLARK; 

STEVE MURPHY; ROBYN MURPHY; ET AL.,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, a Texas Incorporated

Municipality; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; WILLIAM PERRY, 

in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Defense; 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; F. WHITTEN PETERS, 

in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department 

of the Air Force; SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE; 

MICHAEL ZETTLER, General, in his Official Capacity 

as Base Commander of Sheppard Air Force Base,

Defendants - Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(7:96-CV-145)

_____________________________________________________________________

April 9, 2001

Before GARWOOD, HALL,1 and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
2Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5TH CIR.R. 47.5.4.

PER CURIAM:2

AFFIRMED. See 5TH Cir. R. 47.6.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson v. Sterling Shire Apartments

Appellate case number: 01-17-00785-CV

Trial court case number: 1098747

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

Appellant, Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson, has filed a notice of the appeal of the trial 

court’s final judgment signed on October 10, 2017 in a forcible detainer proceeding.

Appellant has filed a “Motion for Preliminary Injunction against any Writ of Possession” 

and a “Motion to Stay Writ of Possession and Order against Writ of Possession.” “A 

judgment of a county court may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal 

unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas 

bond in an amount set by the county court.” TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 24.007 (West

Supp. 2016). The record filed in this Court does not show that appellant has filed a bond 

in the amount set by the trial court in the underlying proceeding. Accordingly, we deny

appellant’s motions. See id.; Johnson v. Freo Tex. LLC, No. 01-15-00398-CV, 2016 WL 

2745265, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 10, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) 

(citations omitted) (“A defendant’s indigence does not relieve [him] of the obligation to 

file a supersedeas bond.”).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: November 14, 2017
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

BRANDIN D. RONGSTAD, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-1212

LT Case No. 2014-301259-CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

______________________________/ 

Decision filed May 17, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County, 

Matthew M. Foxman, Judge. 

Brandin D. Rongstad, Chipley, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

          - 39 CFR Part 956

# AGENCY:

Postal Service.

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service is removing the Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Disciplinary Action for Violations of Restrictions on Post-Employment Activity.

#                         DATES:                         *Effective Date:*

March 11, 2008.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane M. Mego, (703) 812-1905.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Postal Service is removing the Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Disciplinary Action for Violations of Restrictions on Post-Employment Activity. These provisions have been superseded by the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch issued by the Office of Government Ethics. This revision is a mandated charge in the agency rules of procedure before the Judicial Officer and, therefore, it is appropriate for its adoption by the Postal Service to become effective immediately.

Accordingly, the Postal Service removes and reserves 39 CFR part 956 as set forth below:

# PART 956—[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

1. Remove and reserve Part 956. 

Stanley F. Mires,

Chief Counsel, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 08-946 Filed 3-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>


                                  CERTIFICATION

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Energas  Resources,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A for the year ended  January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), George G. Shaw, the Chief
Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  March 21, 2006
                              By: /s/ George G. Shaw
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  George G. Shaw, Chief  Executive and Principal
                                  Financial Officer
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00354

- CV

JAMAYALL RICHARD , Appellant

V.

MARCELA AYALA AND MO ISES AYALA , Appellee s Appeal from the 269th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011

- 43986 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on January 31, 2014 . After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial court’s judgment finding the defendants, Marcela Ayala and Moises Ayala, liable but awarding no damages . Accordingly, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and remands
the case to the trial court for a new trial

.

The Court orders that appellees, Marcela Ayala and Moises Ayala, jointly and severally, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered November 10 , 2015

.Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown. Opinion delivered by Justice

Brown.
<PAGE>

                                  Subsidiary

               Point Tupper Marine Services Limited Nova Scotia
                 (Incorporated under the laws of Nova Scotia)

<PAGE>

                                 Subsidiaries

Statia Terminals Delaware, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Terminals New Jersey, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Terminals, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Terminals Puerto Rico (incorporated under the laws of Puerto Rico)

W.P. Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Statia Terminals Virgin Islands Corporation (incorporated under the laws of
the U.S. Virgin Islands)

Seven Seas Steamship Company, Inc., a Florida corporation

Seven Seas Steamship Company (Sint Eustatius) N.V., a Netherlands Antilles
company

Statia Terminals Corporation N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Terminals Canada, Incorporated (Incorporated under the laws of Nova
Scotia)

Saba Trustcompany N.V., a Netherlands Antilles Company

Bicen Development Corporation N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Terminals N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Point Tupper Marine Services Limited Nova Scotia (Incorporated under the laws
of Nova Scotia)

Statia Laboratory Services N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company

Statia Tugs N.V., a Netherlands Antilles company
<PAGE>   1
EX - 23.1

CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated February 2, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Deltek Systems, Inc. included in this Form 10-K into the
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 File No. 333-30717, Form
S-8 File No. 333-29989 and Form S-3 File No. 333-60457

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Vienna, Virginia
March 27, 2000
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-26067) pertaining to the Special Metals Corporation
1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated February 8, 2002, except
for the last paragraph of our report and Notes 1 and 5, as to which the date is
March 27, 2002, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Special
Metals Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.


                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Buffalo, New York
March 29, 2002
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending March 31, 2009 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   /s/ Anthony Pizzacalla ---------------------------------- Anthony Pizzacalla  President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director   Date: May 5, 2009
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2009
    
    By: /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer E-2
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of the Greenrock Ventures, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify to my knowledge that:



The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
May 5, 2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





| |  | By: | s/ Andriy Zinchuk           
| |  | --- | ----------------------------
| |  |     | President and Director and  
| |  |     | Chief Executive Officer,    
| |  |     | Chief Financial Officer and 
| |  |     | Principal Accounting Officer
| |  |     |                             

Date: May 5, 2011
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6554

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONNIE LANIER RICHMOND, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-89-47, CA-97-175-1) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 19, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Lanier Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie Richmond seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Richmond , Nos. CR-89-47; CA-97-175-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED