alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1415

SENKENESH KIBREAB, Petitioner,
versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A74-639-020) Submitted: December 15, 2003 Decided: December 29, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Socheat Chea, LAW OFFICE OF SOCHEAT CHEA, Atlanta, Georgia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Carol Federighi, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1We note that 8 U.S.C. § 1105a was repealed by the Illegal Immigration R eform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-627, effective April 1, 1997. Because this case was in transition at the time the IIRIRA was passed, § 1105a(a)(4) is applicable here under the terms of the transitional rules contained in § 309(c) of the IIRIRA.
2 As Kibreab failed to challenge on appeal the denial of withholding under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) (2000), or the Convention Against Torture, 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16 (2003), these claims are waived. See Fed. R. App. P. 2 PER CURIAM: Senkenesh Kibreab, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of her application for asylum, withholding of deportation, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the IJ’s decision, designated by the Board as the final agency determination, and find that substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Kibreab failed to establish the past persecution or well-founded fear of future persecution necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (1994); 18 C.F.R. § 1208. 13(b) (2003). We have reviewed the IJ’s credibility determinations and find that they are supported by specific, cogent reasoning, and therefore are entitled to substantial deference. See Figeroa v. INS , 886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir. 1989). Thus, the administrative record supports the IJ’s conclusion that Kibreab failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. 228(a)(6); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999); 11126 Baltimore Blvd., Inc. v. Prince George’s County, Md. , 58 F.3d 988, 993 n.7 (4th Cir. 1995) (en banc).
3 We deny Kibreab’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Feed Materials Production Center

(FMPC)

Special Exposure Cohort Update

Mark R. Rolfes, M.S.

Health Physicist

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

December 2011

Tampa, FL
FMPC SEC Discussion Topics

 Coworker model for uranium internal exposures 

• Whitepaper on unmonitored subcontractor intake 

adjustments provided to the Work Group in November 

2011

 Validation of the HIS-20 database 

• NIOSH validation work completed and closed at the 

February 8, 2011, Work Group meeting
FMPC SEC Discussion Topics—cont. 

 Recycled Uranium 

• NIOSH delivered a white paper (November 2011) on 

bounding the duration of potential exposures to 

unblended Paducah tower ash

 Use of radon breath data for reconstructing doses 

from inhalation of Ra-226 and Th-230 

• NIOSH work completed and closed at the April 19, 2011, 

Work Group meeting
FMPC SEC Discussion Topics—cont. 

 Review of radon emissions from the K-65 silos and 

associated exposures

• Moved to site profile discussions at the February 8, 2011, 

Work Group meeting

 Reconstruction of internal exposures from 

inhalation of Th-232 

• Daily weighted exposure data (1953 - 1967) closed at the 

April 19, 2011, Work Group meeting 

• Chest counts (1968 - 1989) – MIVRML calibration 

response and data completeness evaluation provided to 

the Work Group in November 2011
Presidential Documents

11513 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 42 

Monday, March 3, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8221 of February 28, 2008 

American Red Cross Month, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

In 1881, Clara Barton established the American Red Cross, and for years 

afterward, she led that organization in its noble cause to provide healing, 

comfort, and hope to those in need. Today, her legacy lives on through 

the millions of individuals who have answered the timeless call to serve 

others. During American Red Cross Month, we honor this charitable organization, and we reflect on its remarkable achievements and contributions to 

our country. 

The American Red Cross exemplifies the good heart of this Nation by leading 

humanitarian efforts at home and around the world. This past year the 

American Red Cross provided food, comfort, and medical assistance to the 

victims of the tragic bridge collapse in Minnesota, the devastating wildfires 

in California, and the tornadoes that affected several Southern States. From 

the mountains of Peru to the lowlands of Bangladesh, the American Red 

Cross and its partners helped to provide relief abroad to those affected 

by natural disasters and humanitarian emergencies. 

The American Red Cross also helps provide vital assistance by organizing 

blood drives, teaching health and safety programs, and providing lifesaving 

supplies. By compassionately supporting our men and women in uniform 

and their families, it helps to lift the spirits of our wounded warriors. 

During this month, we send our heartfelt gratitude to the volunteers and 

staff of the American Red Cross. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America and Honorary Chairman of the American Red Cross, by virtue 

of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United 

States, do hereby proclaim March 2008 as American Red Cross Month. 

I commend the dedicated efforts of the American Red Cross, and I encourage 

all Americans to help make our world a better place by volunteering their 

time, energy, and talents for others. 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with MISCELLANEOUS
11514 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 42 / Monday, March 3, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth 

day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 08–940 

Filed 2–29–08; 8:58 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
To the Board of Directors of
Nuveen Flagship Municipal Trust:
In planning and performing

 our audit of the financial statements of NUVEEN
FLAGSHIP
MUNICIPAL TRUST (a Massachusetts business trust,
comprising the Nuveen Intermediate
Duration Municipal Bond Fund, Nuveen Insured
Municipal Bond Fund, Nuveen Flagship
All-American Municipal Bond Fund, Nuveen Flagship
Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund,
Nuveen Flagship Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund and
Nuveen High Yield Municipal
Bond Fund) for the year ended April 30, 2000, we
considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures
for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial
statements and to comply with
the requirements of Form N-SAR, and not to provide
assurance on internal control.
The management of Nuveen Flagship Municipal Trust is
responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by
management are required to assess the expected benefits
and related costs of controls.
Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to
the entity's objective of preparing
financial statements for external purposes that are fairly
presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.  Those controls
include the safeguarding of assets
against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.
Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be
detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal
control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions or that the
effectiveness of the design and operation may deteriorate.
Our consideration of internal control would not
necessarily disclose all matters in internal
control  that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material
weakness is a condition in which the
design or operation of the internal control components
does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud
in amounts that would be material
in relation to the financial statements being audited may
occur and not be detected by
employees in the normal course of performing their
assigned functions.  However, we noted
no matters involving internal control, including controls
for safeguarding securities, that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of
April 30, 2000.
This report is intended solely for the information and use
of management and the Board of
Directors of Nuveen Flagship Municipal Trust and the
Securities and Exchange
Commission.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chicago, Illinois
June 20, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6059 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6059

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
51 Willow Street in Lynn, Massachusetts, as the ``Thomas P. Costin, Jr. 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. THOMAS P. COSTIN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 51 Willow Street in Lynn, Massachusetts, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Thomas P. Costin, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thomas P. 
Costin, Jr. Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
ex109.htm


Exhibit 10.9


 



TERMINATION OF HFG CONSULTING AGREEMENT AND RELEASE







This Termination of HFG Consulting Agreement and Release is made and entered into this first day of December, 2015 by and between SMSA Ballinger Acquisition Corp. (“Ballinger”) and HFG Consulting, LLC (“HFG”).







Recitals







On April 15, 2014,  Ballinger and HFG entered in a Consulting  Agreement (“Consulting Agreement”).







The parties now desire to terminate the Consulting Agreement  with no further obligations or liabilities to either party under such Agreement.







Therefore the parties agree as follows:








	
1.  

	
Ballinger and HFG each agree to terminate the Consulting Agreement with no further rights, liabilities or obligations of each party to the other party under such Agreement.













	
2.  

	
In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by both parties, each party hereby releases, acquits and forever discharges the other party of and from all manner of action(s), cause(s) of action, suits, debts, sums of money, accounts, contracts, agreements, damages, judgments, claims and demands whatsoever, in law or in equity, which either party ever had, now has, or may have against the other party, by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever, from the beginning of time to the date of this Agreement.












 


This Agreement is effective as of the date and year of this Agreement as indicated in the preamble paragraph above.


 


The parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date and year indicated above.


 


HFG Consulting, LLC







By  /s/ Timothy P. Halter


   Timothy P. Halter


Title:  Chairman












SMSA Ballinger Acquisition Corp.












By /s/Orsolya Peresztegi


Orsolya Peresztegi


Title:  President
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00400-CV

CASTLE RIVER ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE

v.

SAMANTHA LUARCA

On Appeal from the

94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020DCV-0559-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 16, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of HQ Global Education Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q, for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yunjie Fang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 14, 2011

/s/ Yunjie FangYunjie FangChief Finance Officer(Principal Finance Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgeworth Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for three month period ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, G.J. de Klerk, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

       1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 15, 2010

                                         By:  /s/ G.J. de Klerk
                                              -------------------------------
                                              G.J. de Klerk
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
1

Use of Mobile Counter Thorium Mass Results as a Bounding Estimate

April 26, 2012

Thorium daughters can exist in varying degrees of disequilibrium. As demonstrated in a previous 

white paper, the extreme bounds of this disequilibrium are 1) 100% equilibrium and 2) triple 

separated disequilibrium.

The mobile counter was calibrated with a phantom containing approximately 30 mg of Th-232 

with daughters in disequilibrium. The degree of disequilibrium falls between the two extremes 

mentioned above (Th-232 to Pb-212 activity ratio = 1.67).

Assume it is known that an individual has 30 mg of Th-232 in his lungs. This is the actual 

content of the lungs, not the value reported by the mobile counter. From the two extremes of 

disequilibrium, we can calculate the amount of Pb-212 in the lungs as falling between 3.3 nCi 

(100% equilibrium) and 0.63 nCi (triple separation).

Ideally, if the disequilibrium of both the phantom and the inhaled material are known, the real 

Pb-212 activity would be calculated from the reported thorium value and the real thorium value 

would then be back calculated from this real Pb-212 activity. Without knowing the degree of 

disequilibrium this cannot be done but a bounding value can be determined, which is what is 

required for this program.

To determine the bounding value, the Pb-212 activity is calculated using one extreme of the 

disequilibrium and then the thorium is back calculated using the opposite extreme 

disequilibrium. The disequilibrium can be chosen for each step such that the upper and lower 

bounds are determined. 

In the example case above, the reported value in the lungs could be higher or lower than the 

actual 30 mg, depending on the degree of disequilibrium of the inhaled material. Since the 

calibration phantom falls between the two disequilibrium ratios, the upper bound Pb-212 activity 

can be determined by assuming 100% equilibrium when calculating the Pb-212 activity from the 

reported thorium value. The upper bound thorium value can then be back-calculated from this Pb 

activity by assuming the triple separation disequilibrium.

For example, for a reported thorium value of 20 mg, the Pb-212 activity would be calculated to 

be 2.2 nCi assuming 100% equilibrium. The bounding thorium value would then be backcalculated to be 105 mg, based on triple-separated material.

It should be noted that for the actual procedure an individual’s intake will be calculated using the 

Pb-212 values because, within a month or so after separation, it is in equilibrium with the Th228. Thus, given a Th-232/Th-228 ratio for the inhaled material we can model the intakes of all 

members of the Th-232 decay chain. The intake will be calculated assuming the triple separation 

disequilibrium. This results in essentially the same process as above but this step was left out for 

clarity.
LYNDAL KENNETH WILKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0648

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 1, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. 

John F. Simon, Judge.

Lyndal Kenneth Wilkins, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7842

TAVO GLENN, a/k/a Tavo T. Glenn, a/k/a Tavo Tarrell Glenn,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

JON OZMINT,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior 

District Judge. (8:08-cv-03078-PMD)

Submitted: April 15, 2010 Decided: June 8, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tavo Glenn, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tavo Glenn seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Glenn has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2006-2010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-74]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-22]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-22 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: January 7, 2008.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 2007]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11JA08.001


[[Page 2008]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11JA08.002


[[Page 2009]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11JA08.003


[[Page 2010]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11JA08.004

[FR Doc. 08-74 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C