Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices 7525 

1From August 21, 1994 through November 12, 

2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the 

President, through Executive Order 12924, which 

had been extended by successive Presidential 

Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3 

CFR 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the 

Regulations in effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–

1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the 

Act was reauthorized by Pub. L. 106–508 (114 Stat. 

2360 (2000)) and remained in effect through August 

20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been 

in lapse. Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 

(3 CFR 2001 Comp 783 (2002)), which has been 

extended by successive Presidential Notices, the 

most recent of which was August 15, 2007 (72 FR 

46137 (August 16, 2007)), continues the Regulations 

in effect under IEEPA. 

incorporated places also constitute 

MCDs. 

Nonvisible feature—A map feature 

that is not visible on the ground, such 

as a city or county boundary through 

space, a property line running through 

space, a short line-of-sight extension of 

a road to another visible feature, or a 

point-to-point line of sight. 

Visible feature—A map feature that 

can be seen on the ground, such as a 

road, railroad track, major above-ground 

transmission line or pipeline, river or 

stream, shoreline, fence, sharply defined 

mountain ridge, or cliff. A nonstandard 

visible feature is a feature that may not 

be clearly defined on the ground (such 

as a ridge), may be seasonal (such as an 

intermittent stream), or may be 

relatively impermanent (such as a 

fence). The Census Bureau generally 

requests verification that nonstandard 

features pose no problem in their 

location during fieldwork by Census 

Bureau staff. 

Executive Order 12866 

This notice has been determined to be 

not significant under Executive Order 

12866. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

This program notice does not 

represent a collection of information 

subject to the requirements of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., 

Chapter 35. 

Dated: February 5, 2008. 

Steve H. Murdock, 

Director, Bureau of the Census. 

[FR Doc. E8–2348 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Economic Analysis 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request; Correction 

AGENCY: Bureau of Economic Analysis 

(BEA), Department of Commerce. 

This notice corrects the notice 

published on February 1, 2008, Volume 

73, Number 22, page 6114. The 

following items are corrected and 

replaced—

Title: Biomedical Research and 

Development Price Index (BRDPI) 

Survey. 

OMB Control Number: 0608–0069. 

All other information stated in the 

February 1, 2008 notice remains 

effective. 

Dated: February 5, 2008. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. E8–2373 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges: 

AR–AM Medical Services LLC; In the 

Matter of AR–AM Medical Services 

LLC; Case No. 06–08 

Order 

The Office of Antiboycott 

Compliance, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, U.S. Department of Commerce 

(‘‘BIS’’), having determined to initiate 

an administrative proceeding pursuant 

to Section 11(c) of the Export 

Administration Act of 1979, as amended 

(50 U.S.C. 2401–2420 (2000)) (the 

‘‘Act’’) 1 and the Export Administration 

Regulations (currently codified at 15 

CFR Parts 730–774 (2007) (the 

‘‘Regulations’’), against AR–AM Medical 

Services LLC (‘‘AR–AM’’), a domestic 

concern, based on allegations set forth 

in the Proposed Charging Letter, dated 

April 17, 2006, that alleged that AR–AM 

committed three violations of the 

Regulations; 

* * * * * 

Specifically, the charges are: 

1. Three Violations of 15 CFR 

760.2(d)—Furnishing Information about 

Business Relationships With Boycotted 

Countries or Blacklisted Persons: During 

the years 2001 and 2002, AR–AM 

engaged in transaction(s) involving the 

sale and/or transfer of goods or services 

(including information) from the United 

States to Syria. In connection with these 

activities, on three occasions, AR–AM, 

with intent to comply with, further or 

support an unsanctioned foreign 

boycott, furnished information 

concerning its or another person’s 

business relationships with or in a 

boycotted country, an activity 

prohibited by Section 760.2(d) of the 

Regulations, and not excepted. 

BIS and AR–AM having entered into 

a Settlement Agreement pursuant to 

Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations 

whereby the parties have agreed to settle 

this matter in accordance with the terms 

and conditions set forth therein and the 

terms of the Settlement Agreement 

having been approved by me; 

It is therefore ordered that: 

First, a civil penalty of $7,200 is 

assessed against AR–AM. Payment shall 

be suspended for a period of two years 

from the date of entry of this Order and 

thereafter shall be waived, provided 

that, during the period of suspension, 

AR–AM has committed no violation of 

the Act and Regulations or any order 

issued thereunder. 

Second, for a period of two years from 

the date of entry of this Order, AR–AM 

Medical Services LLC (Great Neck, New 

York) (‘‘Denied Person’’) may not 

participate, directly or indirectly, in any 

way in any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(collectively, ‘‘item’’) exported or to be 

exported from the United States to 

Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, 

Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the 

United Arab Emirates or the Republic of 

Yemen (collectively, the ‘‘Territory’’) 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity relating to the 

Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document, relating to the 

Territory; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported fro the United States to the 

Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

relating to the Territory subject to the 

Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

to the Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

relating to the Territory subject to the 

Regulations. 

Third, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations from the United States 

to the Territory; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
7526 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices 

1From August 21, 1994 through November 12, 

2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the 

President, through Executive Order 12924, which 

had been extended by successive Presidential 

Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3 

CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the 

Regulations in effect under the Internal Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000)) 

(IEEPA). On November 13, 2000, the Act was 

reauthorized by Pub. L. No. 106–508 (114 Stat. 2360 

(2000)) and remained in effect through August 20, 

2001. Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in 

lapse. Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 

CFR 2001 Comp 783 (2002)), which has been 

extended by successive Presidential Notices, the 

most recent of which was August 15, 2007 (72 FR 

46137 (August 16, 2007)), continues the Regulations 

in effect under IEEPA. 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession or control of any item subject 

to the Regulations that has been or will 

be exported from the United States to 

the Territory, including financing or 

other support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States to the Territory; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States to the Territory; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States to the Territory, and 

which is owned, possessed or controlled 

by the Denied Person or service any 

item, of whatever origin, that is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person if such service involves the use 

of any item subject to the Regulations 

that has been or will be exported from 

the United States to the Territory. For 

the purposes of this paragraph, service 

means installation, maintenance, repair, 

modification or testing. 

Fourth, after notice and opportunity 

for comment as provided in Section 

766.23 of the Regulations, any person, 

firm, corporation or business 

organization related to the Denied 

Person by affiliation, ownership, control 

or position of responsibility in the 

conduct or trade or related services may 

also be made subject to the provisions 

of this Order. 

Fifth, this Order does not prohibit any 

export, reexport, or other transaction 

subject to the Regulations where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of the U.S.- 

origin technology. 

Sixth, the Proposed Charging Letter, 

the Settlement Agreement and this 

Order shall be made available to the 

public, and a copy of this Order shall be 

served on the Denied Person and on 

BIS, and shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

This Order, which constitutes the 

final agency action in this matter, is 

effective immediately. 

Entered this 14th day of January, 2008. 

Darryl W. Jackson, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 08–522 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges: 

DMA Med-Chem Corporation; In the 

Matter of DMA Med-Chem Corporation, 

Case No. 02–10 

Order 

The Office of Antiboycott 

Compliance, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, U.S. Department of Commerce 

(‘‘BIS’’), having determined to initiate 

an administrative proceeding pursuant 

to Section 11(c) of the Export 

Administration Act of 1979, as amended 

(50 U.S.C. 2401–2420 (2000)) (the 

‘‘Act’’) 1 and the Export Administration 

Regulations (currently codified as 15 

CFR Parts 730–774 (2007)) (the 

‘‘Regulations’’), against DMA Med-Chem 

Corporation (‘‘DMA’’), a domestic 

concern, based on allegations set forth 

in the Proposed Charging Letter, dated 

April 17, 2006, that alleged that DMA 

committed one violation of the 

Regulations; 

Specifically, the charge is: 

1. One Violation of 15 CFR 760.2(d)—

Furnishing Information about Business 

Relationships with Boycotted Countries 

or Blacklisted Persons: During the year 

2001, DMA engaged in a transaction 

involving the sale and/or transfer of 

goods or services (including 

information) from the United States to 

Syria. In connection with these 

activities, on one occasion, DMA, with 

intent to comply with, further or 

support an unsanctioned foreign 

boycott, furnished information 

concerning its or another person’s 

business relationships with or in a 

boycotted country, an activity 

prohibited by Section 760.2(d) of the 

Regulations, and not excepted. 

BIS and DMA having entered into a 

Settlement Agreement pursuant to 

Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations 

whereby the parties have agreed to settle 

this matter in accordance with the terms 

and conditions set forth therein and the 

terms of the Settlement Agreement 

having been approved by me; 

It is therefore ordered that: 

First, a civil penalty of $2,400 is 

assessed against DMA. Payment shall be 

suspended for a period of two years 

from the date of entry of this Order and 

thereafter shall be waived, provided 

that, during the period of suspension, 

DMA has committed no violation of the 

Act and Regulations or any order issued 

thereunder. 

Second, for a period of two years from 

the date of entry of this Order, DMA 

Med-Chem Corporation (Great Neck, 

New York) (‘‘Denied Person’’) may not 

participate, directly or indirectly, in any 

way in any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(collectively, ‘‘item’’) exported or to be 

exported from the United States to 

Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, 

Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the 

United Arab Emirates or the Republic of 

Yemen (collectively, the ‘‘Territory’’) 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity relating to the 

Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document, relating to the 

Territory. 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, other otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States to the 

Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

relating to the Territory subject to the 

Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

to the Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

relating to the Territory subject to the 

Regulations. 

Third, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations from the United States 

to the Territory; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES