alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A96A0794.

#### POOR v. LEADER FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVINGS.

(473 SE2d 563)

Smith, Judge.

Jody Poor appeals the trial court’s grant of a writ of possession to Leader Federal Bank.

1. Poor enumerates as error the trial court’s failure to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. She did not, however, request entry of findings and conclusions below. Consequently, such entry was not required. OCGA § 9-11-52 (a). *Middlebrooks v. Fleet Finance,*217 Ga. App. 263 (2) (456 SE2d 627) (1995). Poor relies on an earlier decision in which we remanded a case for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law because the record did not affirmatively show that findings and conclusions were waived. *Fry v. J. I. Kislak Mtg. Corp.,*167 Ga. App. 775 (307 SE2d 302) (1983). That case, though, was decided under OCGA § 9-11-52 (a) before its extensive amendment in 1987. Under the former statute, entry of findings and conclusions was required, unless waived by the parties. See Ga. L. 1987, pp. 1057-1058, § 1. Under the amended statute, however, entry of findings and conclusions is mandatory only upon request by a party. Id.

We reject Poor’s contention that findings of fact and conclusions *890of law were required under OCGA § 44-7-56, the section providing for appeals in dispossessory proceedings. Under that section, “after the notice of appeal is filed with the clerk of the trial court, the clerk shall immediately notify the trial judge of the notice of appeal and the trial judge *may,*within 15 days, supplement the record with findings of fact and conclusions of law.” (Emphasis supplied.) This section makes entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law permissive, not mandatory. We agree with Poor that the record does not indicate whether the required notice was given by the clerk of court to the trial judge that a notice of appeal had been filed. Assuming that the notice was not sent, however, we find no harm to Poor; the requirement that notice be sent from the clerk to the trial judge does not impose a burden on the trial judge to enter findings and conclusions in the absence of a request by one of the parties.

Decided June 26, 1996.

*Macklyn A. Smith,*for appellant.

*Morris, Schneider & Prior, Susanne O. Torres,*for appellee.

2. Poor also contends the trial court erroneously granted the writ of possession, maintaining that she did not receive proper notice of the prior foreclosure sale as required by the security deed. We find no merit in this contention. Poor has pointed to no evidence supporting her claim, and we find none in the record. Moreover, her attack on the basis of the improper foreclosure is one on the landlord’s title, an attack that is not permissible in a dispossessory proceeding. *Bridges v. City of Moultrie,*210 Ga. App. 697, 698 (1) (437 SE2d 368) (1993); *Partin v. Southern Discount Co.,*167 Ga. App. 798, 799 (307 SE2d 697) (1983).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.*
# National Consumer Protection Week, 2008

As we face new challenges in the 21st century, we must work to ensure that Americans are kept safe in the marketplace. During National Consumer Protection Week, as my Administration works with Congress to improve our consumer product safety system, we also encourage Americans to make informed financial decisions and take advantage of the resources that can help them become responsible consumers, savers, and investors. 

This year's theme for National Consumer Protection Week, “Financial Literacy: A Sound Investment,” encourages consumers to take steps to build a firm financial foundation. By becoming informed consumers, individuals can help plan for their future, protect their identity, and effectively manage their finances. It is important for citizens to be knowledgeable on financial matters such as choosing a health insurance plan, comparing savings and retirement plans, and realizing how credit scores can affect them. Education is the first line of defense in helping consumers manage their money wisely and safeguard themselves against fraud and identity theft. 

My Administration is working to expand the American people's financial education. In January of this year, I signed an Executive Order establishing the President's Advisory Council on Financial Literacy. This Council will help keep America competitive and assist Americans in understanding and addressing financial matters. By visiting consumer.gov and mymoney.gov, Americans can discover the tools they need to make financial decisions and be successful in today's marketplace. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 2 through March 8, 2008, as National Consumer Protection Week. I call upon Government officials, industry leaders, and consumer advocates to make available information about how citizens can help to prevent fraud and identity theft, and I encourage all Americans to gain the financial literacy they need to compete in the 21st century. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08-977

Billing code 3195-01-P
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in

5

TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60146

Summary Calendar

HENRY BOYD, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LOCKE D. BARKLEY, Chapter 13 Trustee,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Mississippi

(3:97-CV-11-S-A)

December 16, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Henry Boyd, Jr., appeals an adverse summary judgment in his action

against Locke D. Barkley in her capacity as bankruptcy trustee under 11 U.S.C.

§§ 704 and 1327. He also appeals the denial of his motion for summary

judgment. He further moves for a determination of jurisdiction.
2

The motion challenging the jurisdiction of the district court and this court

is DENIED.

Boyd is cautioned that the filing or pursuit of any further frivolous appeals

by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of the full panoply of sanctions,

including an order denying him access to the court without the prior written

consent of an active judge of this court.

As to this appeal, on the facts as found and reasons assigned by the

district court in its Opinion in this matter signed February 9, 1998 and filed on

February 10, 1998, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
# C_2011013EN.01000101.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/1

---

2011/C 13/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 346, 18.12.2010

OJ C 346, 18.12.2010

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 328, 4.12.2010

OJ C 317, 20.11.2010

OJ C 301, 6.11.2010

OJ C 288, 23.10.2010

OJ C 274, 9.10.2010

OJ C 260, 25.9.2010

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

M.G.,

Respondent

v.

S.J.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 65 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 12, 2010 | By:  | /s/ Adam      Wasserman                |
|------------------------------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |      | Adam      Wasserman                                                                                                    |
|                         |      | Chief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and                                                                  |
|                         |      | Accounting      Officer)                                                                                          |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7720

MARION LEON BEA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:09-cv-00907-TSE-TCB)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 22, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marion Leon Bea, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marion Leon Bea filed motions in the district court 

challenging his Virginia state court convictions that he 

characterized as seeking relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). He

seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his motions

collectively as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition, 

and denying relief on that basis. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); Reid v. Angelone, 

369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating 

that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bea has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Bea’s notice of appeal and 

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive 
3

petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. United States v. Winestock, 

340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain 

authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition, a prisoner 

must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of 

constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by

the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly 

discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due 

diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and 

convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no 

reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of 

the offense. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) (2006). Bea’s claims do 

not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny 

authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying
report of Music of Your Life, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2014 (the “Report”),
I, Marc Angell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October 15, 2014



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Marc Angell        
|Marc Angell            
|Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code), John R. Schwab, Chief Financial Officer of NCOGroup, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the AnnualReport of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2009 (the “Report”) that:

 
| (1)    | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company. |

 

 
| Date:  | March 31,  2010     |   | /s/  John R. Schwab |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|   | John  R. Schwab          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00694-CV

Robert LEAL and Ramiro Leal,

Appellants

v.

CUANTO ANTES MEJOR LLC,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-02-00041-CVK

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order and Final 

Judgment Regarding Summary Judgment is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellee recover its costs of appeal from appellants.

SIGNED July 1, 2015.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
| **CERTIFICATION OF**                                    |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| **CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER** |
| **PURSUANT TO**                                         |
| **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**                             |
| **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                              |
| **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**       |

I, Scott Cramer, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Affinity Mediaworks Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| (i)      

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

By:

*/s/ Scott Cramer*

 

Name:

Scott Cramer

 

Title:

Chief Executive Officer and

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Date:

June 21, 2010

 

 

                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Enc

CHAIRMAN 

Henry Anderson, M.D.

Madison, Wisconsin 

MEMBERS 

Josie Beach 

Richland, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho 

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa 

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D.

 New York, New York 

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota 

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico 

Loretta R. Valerio 

Santa Fe, New Mexico 

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. 

Lafayette, Indiana 

STAFF 

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 

Rashaun Roberts, Ph.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia 

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH 

1150 Tusculum Ave 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226 

(513) 533-6825 

May 16, 2022 

The Honorable Xavier Becerra 

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services 

200 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20201 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) has evaluated 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00253 concerning workers at the 

International Nickel Company (INCO), Reduction Pilot Plant (RPP) in 

Huntington, West Virginia, under the statutory requirements established by the 

Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 

and incorporated into 42 C.F.R. § 83.13. 

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for: 

“All International Nickel Company (INCO) security personnel who 

worked at any location within the Reduction Pilot Plant (RPP) during the 

period from June 7, 1976, through November 26, 1978.” 

NIOSH found that it has access to sufficient exposure monitoring and other 

information necessary to estimate with sufficient accuracy the radiation dose 

received by members of this group, and therefore a class covering this group 

should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs with this determination. 

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the April 27-28, 2022, 

Board meeting held by conference call, the Board agrees with the NIOSH 

recommendation that this class not be added to the SEC. 

Sincerely, 

[Signature on File] 

Henry Anderson, MD, Chair 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Sino-American Investment Holdings
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:


The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                                 /s/ Zhong Fang
                                 ----------------------------
                                 By: Zhong Fang
                                 Title: President and Director
                                 and Chief Executive Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer


Date: October 20, 2010
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-53902, 333-93823 and 333-74209) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109969,333-107881, 333-90442, 333-89566, 333-65112 and 333-53858) of Intraware, Inc.of our report dated April 15, 2005 relating to the financial statements, whichappears in this Form 10-K.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

San Jose, California

April 21, 2005

 

----
Exhibit 10.10


 


Share Exchange Agreement


 


Transferor (Party A): Wenzhou Xibolun
Fluid Equipment Factory


 


Transferee (Party B): Anyuan Sun


 


According to the resolution of the shareholders’
meeting of Wenzhou Xibolun Fluid Equipment Co., Limited on March 8, 2006, Party A and Party B agreed to reach following share exchange
agreement on March 8, 2006.


 


		1.	Party A voluntarily transfers 60% of shares in Wenzhou Xibolun Fluid Equipment Co., Limited, Ltd.
in value of RMB 600,000 to Party B.



 


		2.	The consideration of share transfer will be delivered out of book within 30 days after the approval
of the industry and commerce bureau.



 


		3.	After the share transfer, Party A will no long possess any right and obligation regarding Wenzhou
Xibolun Fluid Equipment Co., Limited which will be possessed by Party B.



 


		4.	Dispute resolution: Any dispute shall be resolved by the court.



 


		5.	This agreement is effective after both parties sign it. It has 4 originals, with Party A and Party
B each holding one copy, the industry and commerce bureau holding one copy, and Wenzhou Xibolun Fluid Equipment Co., Limited holding
one copy for record.



 


Party A: /s/ Wenzhou Xibolun Fluid Equipment
Factory


 


Party B: /s/ Anyuan Sun


 


2006-3-8