United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1456

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Adam Cade Michael Gilson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo

____________

 Submitted: March 14, 2016

 Filed: June 13, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before MURPHY, BEAM, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Adam Cade Michael Gilson appeals from the district court's imposition of a

1

90-month sentence following Gilson's conditional guilty plea to one count of being

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Northern District of Iowa. 
a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§

922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). He challenges the district court's denial of a motion to

suppress and the four-level enhancement pursuant to United States Sentencing

Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) because he "used or possessed [the] firearm

. . . in connection with another felony offense." We affirm.

On May 2, 2014, while conducting surveillance at a house suspected to be used

for methamphetamine distribution, an officer with the Waterloo, Iowa, Police

Department identified a vehicle parked there, later followed that vehicle (driven by

Gilson) and "observed that the license plate sat lower and partially blocked some of

the letters for the county and then also almost three-quarters of the actual registration

sticker." The officer could not read the registration sticker, even at close range. 

Based in part on the obstructed view of the license plate, a deputy of the Tama

County Sheriff subsequently conducted a traffic stop of the vehicle. During the stop,

the deputy observed a handgun under the front passenger seat. A second handgun

waslater located under the driver's seat. The officers also found ammunition. Based

on this evidence, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Gilson with being a

felon in possession of firearms and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 

Gilson filed a motion to suppress, challenging the probable cause underlying the stop. 

The district court denied the motion and then Gilson entered a conditional guilty plea

reserving his appeal on the issue. The district court sentenced Gilson to 90 months'

imprisonment. 

On appeal, Gilson challenges the denial of his motion to suppress and the

enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) at sentencing. As to the stop, Gilson

argues the officers did not have probable cause to stop his vehicle for violating Iowa

Code § 321.38, which generally governs vehicle registration plates. Specifically at

issue is the portion of the statute that requires the registration plate be "securely

fastened" "in a place and position to be clearly visible and shall be maintained free

from foreign materials and in a condition to be clearly legible." Id. § 321.38. He

-2-
claims that by its plain language, the statute does not apply to validation stickers

affixed to a registration plate and that the district court impermissibly expanded the

meaning of § 321.38 in concluding otherwise. Upon de novo review, we conclude 2

that denial of the motion to suppress was proper because, as thoroughly analyzed by 

the district court, "Iowa law requires operators of motor vehicles to display the

[validation] sticker such that it remains readable," and therefore probable cause

supported the stop. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

Gilson also requests that this court overrule United States v. Jackson, 633 F.3d

703 (8th Cir. 2011), and further overrule or distinguish United States v. Walker, 771

F.3d 449 (8th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1538 (2015), and its progeny in

which this court holds that when a defendant is convicted of being a felon in

possession of a firearm in a manner that also violates Iowa Code § 724.4(1), he

possesses the firearm in connection with another felony offense for purposes of the

four-level enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). Walker, 771 F.3d at 452-53;

see also United States v. Boots, 816 F.3d 971, 974-75 (8th Cir. 2016) (applying

Walker and holding that Iowa Code § 724.4(1) qualified as another felony offense for

purposes ofthe U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement). Gilson recognizesthat this

panel is unable to reverse existing precedent, Owsley v. Luebbers, 281 F.3d 687, 690

(8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) ("It is a cardinal rule in [this] circuit that one panel is

bound by the decision of a prior panel."), but argues these cases were improperly

decided and should be reviewed by the court en banc. We acknowledge the argument

although we are bound by Walker. 

For the reasons stated herein, we affirm. 

______________________________

The district court's legal conclusions are reviewed de novo and its factual

2

findings are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Vanover, 630 F.3d 1108, 1113-

14 (8th Cir. 2011). 

-3-