alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1, 2017

a0125 

# Order

Clerk February 1, 2017

154047

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154047

COA: 324677

Branch CC: 13

- 121067

- FH

KRISTOPHER ALLEN WADE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2016 and

May 9, 2016 judgments of the Court of Appeals are considere d and, pursuant to MCR

7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgments of the

Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Branch Circuit Court for

reconsideration of the defendant’s motion to correct the presentence report. The motion

was timely filed; therefore the procedures of MCR 6.425(E)(2) apply. Moreover, the

defendant is not precluded from challenging information in the presentence report that

had appeared in an earlier presentence report for a different offense but went

unchallenged at that time.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
NO. 07-07-0503-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	JUNE 23, 2008

	______________________________

	DAVID MCGARY a/k/a DAVID SANDERS, 

										Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

										Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARDEMAN COUNTY;

	NO. 4006; HON. DAN MIKE BIRD, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Appellant David McGary a/k/a David Sanders appeals from his conviction of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine).  His issue on appeal involves comments made during the State’s closing argument.  The first pertained to the prosecutor’s allusion to a “three strikes and you’re out” rule.  Though objections to the comments were twice sustained and the jury instructed to disregard them, appellant believed that he was entitled to a mistrial.  The second comment involved reference to punishment being assessed in accordance with community desires.  We affirm.  

	Regarding the “three strikes” comment and the need for a mistrial, appellant did not request one.  Thus, he waived any complaint he had about not receiving one.  See Thompson v. State, 12 S.W.3d 915, 920-21 (Tex. App.–Beaumont 2000, pet. ref’d) (holding that a defendant must request a mistrial to preserve his complaint for review).  

	As for the purported reference to community desires when assessing punishment, no objection was uttered.  Thus, appellant also failed to preserve this complaint.  See Archie v. State, 221 S.W.3d 695, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (stating that to preserve error regarding prosecutorial argument, a defendant must pursue his objections to an adverse ruling).

	Accordingly, we overrule the issue and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5851 

To provide for the termination of residential or motor vehicle leases and 

telephone service contracts for combat support agency personnel working 

in combat theaters of operation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2018 

Mr. KEATING (for himself and Mr. COOK) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the termination of residential or motor vehicle 

leases and telephone service contracts for combat support 

agency personnel working in combat theaters of operation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deployed Civilian Par5 ity Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5851 IH

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF RESIDENTIAL OR MOTOR VEHI2 CLE LEASES AND TELEPHONE SERVICE CON3 TRACTS FOR CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF COM4 BAT SUPPORT AGENCIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 8 of title 10, United 

6 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 193 the 

7 following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 193a. COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCY PERSONNEL: TER9 MINATION OF RESIDENTIAL OR MOTOR VEHI10 CLE LEASES AND TELEPHONE SERVICE CON11 TRACTS. 

12 ‘‘The terms governing the termination of residential 

13 or motor vehicle leases and telephone service contracts de14 scribed in sections 305 and 305A, respectively of the 

15 Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3955 and 

16 3956) with respect to servicemembers who receive military 

17 orders described in such Act shall apply in the same man18 ner and to the same extent to civilian employees of combat 

19 support agencies (as such term is defined in section 193(f) 

20 of this title) who are assigned to work in a combat theater 

21 of operations for a period of 120 days or more.’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

23 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

24 after the item relating to section 193 the following new 

25 item: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5851 IH

‘‘Sec. 193a. Combat support agency personnel: termination of residential or 

motor vehicle leases and telephone service contracts.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5915 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5915

To amend the TRIO programs to require priority to be given to homeless 
            children and youth, and students in foster care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2018

 Mr. Mitchell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the TRIO programs to require priority to be given to homeless 
            children and youth, and students in foster care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foster Youth Success in College 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITY FOR HOMELESS CHILD AND YOUTH AND STUDENTS IN FOSTER 
              CARE.

    (a) Talent Search.--Section 402B(d)(1) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a-12(d)(1)) is amended by inserting before the 
semicolon at the end the following: ``, and that priority will be given 
to homeless children and youth (as such term is defined in section 725 
of the McKinney Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a)) and 
students in foster care or who are aging out of the foster care 
system''.
    (b) Upward Bound.--Section 402C(e)(1) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 is amended by inserting before the semicolon at the end the 
following: ``, and that priority will be given to homeless children and 
youth (as such term is defined in section 725 of the McKinney Vento 
Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a)) and students in foster care 
or who are aging out of the foster care system''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5667 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5667

 To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to reauthorize the Acer Access 
                        and Development Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2018

Mr. Welch (for himself and Mr. Courtney) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to reauthorize the Acer Access 
                        and Development Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Acer Access and Development Program 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. ACER ACCESS AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REAUTHORIZED.

    Section 12306(f) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 
1632c(f)) is amended by striking ``2014 through 2018'' and inserting 
``2018 through 2023''.
                                 <all>
```
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Uranium Refining AWEs Work Group

Teleconference Meeting

January 22, 2015

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537 Participant Pass Code: 9933701

12:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and Introductions

Discussion:

• Overview of SC&A Site Profile Review of DuPont Deepwater Works

• Resolution of findings 2, 4-7

• Actions/path forward

Adjourn
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Presidential Documents 19957 

Memorandum of March 28, 2008 

Assignment of Functions Under Section 1821(c) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 

2007 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United 

States Code, I hereby assign to you the functions of the President under 

section 1821(c) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–53). 

In the performance of your responsibility under this memorandum, you 

shall, as appropriate, consult the heads of other departments and agencies. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, March 28, 2008. 

[FR Doc. 08–1125 

Filed 4–10–08; 8:58 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PRESDOCGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9134-9135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group, Function, Integration, and 
Rehabilitation Sciences Subcommittee.

[[Page 9135]]

    Date: March 10, 2008.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Anne Krey, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e7f752a2f715e70777630797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89e8e2bdb8e6c9e7e0e1a7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 11, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-712 Filed 2-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002







In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP 303 East Wacker Drive
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended June30, 2009as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal executive
officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to his knowledge:





(1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      August 7, 2009
            /s/ George J.
      Carter
              George
      J. Carter
              President
              (Principal Executive
      Officer)
Summary – ORAUT-PROC-0004, Rev. 0 1 SC&A – January 20, 2011

Overview of

SCHEDULING TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS

(ORAUT-PROC-0004, Rev. 0)

As part of the process of treating claims by workers at Department of Energy and Atomic 

Weapons Employee facilities, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

(NIOSH) and technical support contractor staff conduct telephone interviews with claimants. 

The purpose of this procedure, Scheduling of Telephone Interviews (ORAUT-PROC-0004), is to 

outline the process for scheduling a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI). 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RESULTING FROM THE TECHNICAL REVIEW

Review of the procedure by the technical contractor for the Advisory Board on Radiation and 

Worker Health (the Board) produced the four findings summarized below: 

Finding #1: Interview letter(s) are sent out without adequate dose reconstruction information. 

Finding #2: Letter(s) are lacking in essential content, especially for family member claimants.

Finding #3: The procedure is objective, in that the same letter is sent to all claimants. However, 

family member claimants could be expected to need more preparation prior to receiving their 

interview letters. 

Finding #4: Claimants are often inadequately prepared before their telephone interviews.

RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS

In response to the findings, NIOSH developed a draft acknowledgement packet and a revised 

attachment to the CATI letter. New language was devised to improve the information provided 

to the claimants, and delete passages from that made it seem as if the claimant did not have a 

choice about participating in the interview. 

Note that this procedure, as well as related procedures Performing Telephone Interviews 

 (ORAUT-PROC-0005) and Reviewing Telephone Interviews (ORAUT-PROC-0017), have been 

replaced by the procedure Computer Assisted Telephone Interview Process (ORAUT-PROC0090). All of the findings listed above were closed under this procedure, but were determined to 

be unresolved under the new procedure and will be re-opened under ORAUT-PROC-0090.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7989** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JOHN E. HARGROVE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg
. John Preston Bailey , Chief District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00058

- JPB

- JES

- 1; 3:12

- cv - 00124

- JPB

- JES )

Submitted : August 21 , 2014 Decided: August 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. John E. Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Perri, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John E. Har grove seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabi lity. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hargrove has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly,

we deny Hargrove’s motions for a transcript of oral argument at the Government’s expense, for a scheduling order, a nd for a stay to file a supplemental brief, deny a certificate of3 appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would

n ot aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This scheduel contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of operations and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Report for the
period ending November 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>        
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,739
<SECURITIES>                                    13,318
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                       549
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,862
<PP&E>                                           3,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,971
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,910
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (873)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,768
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Home Federal Holdings Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within this entity, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Clyde A. McArthurClyde A. McArthur