alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 7, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133274 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. DENNIS G. SIMPSON, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 133274 COA: 264106 WCAC: 04-000017 BORBOLLA CONSTRUCTION & CONCRETE SUPPLY, INC. and CI NCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, DefendantsAppellants, and

FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees, and

SILICOSIS DUST DISEASE & LOGGING INDUSTRY COMPENSATION FUND,
Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On November 8, 2007, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeal s. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the opinion of the Court of Appeals because the panel erroneously
held that Rakestraw v Gen Dynamic s Land Sys, Inc, 469 Mich 220 (2003) , does not apply
to the facts of this case. We AFFIRM the result reached by the Cour t of Appeals for the
reasons stated in the Wo rkers’ Compensation Appella te Commission opinion.

W EAVER , J., concurs and states as follows:

I concur in the order vacating the Cour t of Appeals opinion but affirming the result of the opinion for the reasons stated in the Workers’ Comp ensation Appellate_______________________________________ __ 2

Commission opinion. Although I dissented in Rakestraw v Gen Dynami cs Land Sys, Inc, 469 Mich 220, 234 (2003), my dissent in that case is not in consistent with the order.

K ELLY , J., concurs in part and dissents in part and states as follows:

I concur in that part of the order affirming the result reached by the Court of Appeals. But I dissent from th e order to the extent that it vacates the Court of Appeals decision. I believe that the Court of Appe als panel correctly analy zed the issue, and I would not vacate its published opinion.

t1204 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 7, 2007

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 5860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Research Demonstration and Dissemination 
Projects (R18's).
    Date: February 22, 2008.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: St. Gregory Hotel, 2033 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036.
    Contact Person: Holly Patton, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 
301-435-0280, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#671706131308090f27090f0b050e49090e0f49000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f3f2e3b3b2021270f2127232d266121262761282039">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.828, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    January 24, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-421 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 18, 2008, pursuant to Section                           ( print page 9357)                        6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et. seq.*                     (“the Act”), Electronic Healthcare Network Accreditation Commission (“EHNAC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, EHNAC has expanded the scope of its standard setting activities in two new areas by initiating beta testing of two new accreditation programs                     *i.e.*, one accreditation program to assure compliance with the security and privacy controls and procedures of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 for those entities that create, send and receive electronic transcription and coding information, which in many cases includes protected health information (PHI) under HIPAA; and the other accreditation program for Third Party Administrators and Medical Billers that electronically receive and process administrative and clinical data from providers, payers and employers regarding claims, eligibility and payment information, which data contains PHI and must comply with HIPAA regulations regarding privacy and security in addition to technical and infrastructure along with resource requirements.                

                    On March 8, 2005, EHNAC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25110).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 08-752 Filed 2-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form
  10-Q of EcoEmissions Solutions Inc. for the Quarter Ended November 30, 2009,
  I, Thomas Crom, Chief Financial Officer of Resource Group, Inc. hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended
        November 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                      
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on
        Form 10-Q for the Period Ended November 30, 2009, fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of EcoEmissions Solutions Inc.

|By:    | s/Thomas Crom                        
|------ | -------------------------------------
|       | Thomas Crom,                         
|       | Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
|       |                                      
|       |                                      
|Dated: | January 27, 2010                     

---
Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement

for

Members of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (Board) is very concerned with 

maintaining the transparency of the compensation program created by the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA). In an 

effort to foster a fully open and honest environment for claimants and in order to allay 

any concerns within the stakeholder community regarding perceived or actual conflicts 

of interest for Board members, the Board releases the following information for its 

Members: 

Board Member’s Name: Victoria A. Cassano, M.D., M.P.H. 

Job Title and Current Employer: President and Chief Executive Officer

Performance Medical Consulting, LLC

Purcellville, VA. 

Biographical Information: Dr. Cassano served in the Navy as an Occupational 

Physician and Undersea Medical Officer. As such, she was also trained as a Radiation 

Health Officer. She oversaw numerous radiation health programs on submarines and 

Naval Prototype Training Units, including the largest at Ballston Spa, NY. After 

retirement, she returned to government service as the Director of Radiation and 

Physical Exposures Service for the Veterans Health Administrations’ central office. She 

reviewed claims and provided medical opinions for “Atomic Veterans” and others 

exposed to radiation while in military service and was the Agency’s liaison to the 

Veterans Board for Dose Reconstruction. She most recently served on the Department of 

Labor, Federal Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health for the 

EEOICPA.

Expert Witness Experience: N/A

DOE/AWE Sites Where a Conflict of Interest Exists: None

Subject Matters Where a Conflict of Interest Exists: N/A

Conflicted Sites/Subject Matters Regarding Which the Board Member Has Received 

Permission to Participate: N/A
|   | (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      February 22, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Joshua Bleak                                          |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Joshua      Bleak                                              |
|                          |   | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Adelphia Recovery Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, [Jeffrey A. Brodskyor Barry D. Shalov], a principal of Quest Turnaround Advisor, LLC, TrustAdministrator of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust.

 

 
| By: Quest  Turnaround Advisors, LLC                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| as Trust  Administrator of the Adelphia Recovery Trust |
|                                                   |
| /s/ Jeffrey  A. Brodsky                                |   |
| Jeffrey A.  Brodsky                                    |
| Member                                                 |
|                                                   |
|                                                   |
| Date: August  11, 2008                                 |

 

----
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5791 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 28), 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 9609 South University Boulevard in Highlands 

Ranch, Colorado, as the ‘‘Deputy Sheriff Zackari 

Spurlock Parrish, III, Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5791 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DEPUTY SHERIFF ZACKARI SPURLOCK PAR2 RISH, III, POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 9609 South University Boule5 vard in Highlands Ranch, Colorado, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Deputy Sheriff Zackari Spurlock Par7 rish, III, Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Deputy Sheriff 

12 Zackari Spurlock Parrish, III, Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02
- 23
- 00489
- CV

___________________________

Ori gina l Proceeding Justice of the Peace, Precinct 7 of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. JP07
- 22
- DC00029121 Before Bassel, Womack and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### J OHN 

### A NTHONY 

### C ASTRO 

### , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator has file d a petition for writ of mandamus regard ing the actions of a justice of the peace. We lack mandamus jurisdiction over a justice of the peace. See Tex. Gov ’ t Code Ann. § 22.221(b)
– (c); see also In re Euristhe , No. 02
- 23
- 00360
- CV, 2023 WL 6442934, at *1 (Tex . App.
— Fort Worth Oct. 3, 2023, orig. pr ocee ding) (per cur iam ) (mem. op.) (dismissing mandamus petition for lack of jurisdiction over justice o f the peace) ; In re Garc ia , No. 13
- 18
- 00651
- CV, 2018 WL 6219254, at *2 (Tex. App.
— Corpus Christi

– Edinburg Nov. 28 , 2018, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (“T his Court does not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace.”). Accordingly, we dismiss rel ator ’ s petition for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam Delivered : Janu ary 2, 2024
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference of the

SRS Work Group

September 26, 2016 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

10:00 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

DISCUSSION

1. Update on current DCAS SEC work and schedule for completion.

2. DCAS explanation of how safe work permits data will be analyzed, statistical metrics for

the “success” of this test, and the strengths and limitations of this validation approach

(i.e., full discussion of the purpose and the methodology).

3. Does proposed safe work permit analysis satisfy need to validate adequacy and

completeness of subcontractor dose data? Are the CTW subcontractors reliably

represented in the data to be analyzed?

4. Follow-up questions with respect to data adequacy of CTW primary contractors, CTW

subcontractors, and operations workers.

5. Follow-up questions re: Neptunium, Thorium, and Metal Hydrides co-worker models.

6. Follow-up discussion of DCAS/SC&A work priorities.

7. Petitioner comments (optional).

Adjourn
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

Assigned on Briefs September 21, 2007

SARAH ELIZABETH FERGUSON v. JOHNNY WAYNE FERGUSON

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Lawrence County

No. 11376-03 Jim T. Hamilton, Chancellor

No. M2005-02468-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 13, 2008

PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, P.J., M.S. dissenting in part.

Because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion as to the classification of some of the

personal property at issue in this appeal, I must dissent. It is undisputed that the boat and trailer were

Husband’s separate property prior to the marriage. Consequently, we must begin with the

presumption that they should be classified as his separate property. Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-

121(b)(2). Therefore, the burden of proving that the property had been transmuted into marital

property lay with Wife. Based on the record before us, I do not believe that Wife met that burden.

The trial court’s order does not reflect the basis upon which it awarded the boat and trailer

to Wife. Consequently, it is for this court to review the record and determine on its own where the

preponderance of the evidence lies. The specific question is whether Wife established conduct by

Husband regarding the boat so as to establish an intent on his part to make a gift of the boat to the

marital estate. Transmutation occurs when the parties to a marriage treat property in such a way as

to evidence an intention that it become marital property. Langschmidt v. Lanschmidt, 81 S.W.3d

741, 747 (Tenn. 2002). In determining whether otherwise separate property has been converted to

marital property, courts look to the intent and actions of the parties, and the determination is

dependent upon the facts of an individual case. Wilson v. Moore, 929 S.W.2d 367, 374 (Tenn. Ct.

App. 1996); Batson v. Batson, 769 S.W.2d 849, 858 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988).

None of the usual or more obvious indices of an intent to gift the marital estate with

separately owned property, such as taking title in joint names, is present herein. See Woodward v.

Woodward, 240 S.W.3d 825, 829 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). Instead, the majority relies primarily on

Husband’s deposition statements regarding the boat, along with other items, wherein he stated, “As

long as we was together it was ours.” While that statement may indicate an intent to share use of

the boat during the marriage, it does not, in my opinion, indicate an intent to transfer ownership. The

qualifying condition of the parties being “together” is inconsistent with an intent that ownership be

converted to joint. Additionally, Husband testified that he placed the boat and trailer with his

daughter as collateral for loans she made to him, indicating his exercise of ownership and his belief

that he was the sole owner. It also indicates a lack of intent to gift the boat and trailer to the marital

estate. Accordingly, I would hold that the boat and trailer remained Husband’s separate property and
-2-

were, consequently, not subject to distribution as part of the marital estate. In all other respects, I

concur with the majority opinion.

____________________________________

PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, P.J., M.S.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANNA RUILOBA,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00123-CR

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D02097)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s fourth motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until November 9, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before November 9, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of October, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Meeting of the 

Dose Reconstruction Methods Work Group 

September 13, 2018 

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537 

Participant Pass Code: 9933701 

8:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

Work Group Discussion 

Purpose: To assess the adequacy of current case review methods and effort to “verify a 

reasonable sample of the doses” estimated by NIOSH, as needed to advise HHS on “the 

scientific validity and quality” of dose reconstructions “for the purposes of the compensation 

program” 

• Status and results/(findings/trends in findings) of current DR review process 

• Considerations based on NIOSH/Griffon review report and prior WG/Board discussions 

• Path forward and/or plans for full Board discussion 

1:00 p.m. Adjourn