alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Commitments And Contingencies (Schedule Of Silzone Legal Accrual And Related Insurance Receivable) (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Sep. 29, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]**                                                                                                         |          |          |
| Silzone legal accrual                                                                                                                                           | $ 4           | $ 22          |
| Silzone insurance receivable                                                                                                                                    | $ 3           | $ 15          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Silzone insurance receivable.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**stj_SilzoneInsuranceReceivable**Namespace Prefix:**stj_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Silzone loss contingency accrual as of the balance sheet date.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**stj_SilzoneLossContingencyAccrualAtCarryingValue**Namespace Prefix:**stj_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
```

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rampart Studios , Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for three month period ended March 31, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, G.J. de Klerk, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

       1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 19, 2013

                                         By:  /s/ G.J. de Klerk
                                              -------------------------------
                                              G.J. de Klerk
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
```
Appeal Reinstated and Order filed June 26, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-01127-CV

____________

NEW DELIVERANCE CHURCH, INC., Appellant

V.

ADAM MILLER, HOUSSIERE, DURANT & HOUSSIERE, LLP, AND HRD 

CORPORATION D/B/A MARCUS OIL & CHEMICAL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2004-70043A

R E I N S T A T E M E N T O R D E R

Appellee HRD Corporation d/b/a Marcus Oil & Chemical petitioned for voluntary 

bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, under 

cause number 11-36020. Because a stay is automatically effected by Section 362(a) of the 

Bankruptcy Code, when this court received notice of appellant’s bankruptcy filing, on July 

28, 2011, we stayed all proceedings in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. 
2

On June 18, 2012, appellee filed a motion to reinstate the appeal pursuant to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3(a). Attached to the motion is a true copy of the 

bankruptcy court’s order dismissing the bankruptcy case.

The motion is granted. Accordingly, the case is ordered REINSTATED and 

placed on the court’s active docket. 

PER CURIAM
Order entered June 16, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00301-CR

TRAMON LEONTRA MONTRELL WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F20-76304-I

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Sasha Brooks’s request for a thirty-day

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. Judgment was entered on April 1, 

2022, and a timely motion for new trial was filed on May 2, 2022, making the 

reporter’s record due on August 1, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a); 26.2(a)(2);

35.2(b).

We DENY the request as premature.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KU L DI P S I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 72239 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 057- 908 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , an dF I S H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . K ul di p S i ng h, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I nd i a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n ba s e d on in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n and r e vi e w de novo



# FI LED DE C 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 72239 2 qu e s t i o n s o f

l aw. Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng S i ngh’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n on the grou nd thatS i ng h fai l ed t o est abl i sh thathe w as prej ud i ce d b y the al l eged in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

h is f o rm e ra tto rn e y s . Se e id. at7 9 3 -9 4 (p rej u d i ce resu l t s w he n “ the pe r f

orm anc e of

c ouns e l w a s s o i na de qua t e tha ti tm ayhave a f f e c t e d the o u tc o m e o f

th e p r o c e e d in g s ” ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement (No. 33-23649) on Form S-8 relating to the registration
of 500,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of National Auto
Finance Company, Inc. ("Registrant") of our report dated April 7, 2000 relating
to the financial statements of the Registrant for the year ended December 31,
1999, included in the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999, which are incorporated by reference in this
Registration Statement.

West Palm Beach, Florida                      BDO Seidman, LLP
April 14, 2000
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 (h) Railings and handrails . Standard railings shall be provided on the open sides of all exposed stairways and stair platforms. Handrails shall be provided on at least one side of
closed stairways preferably on the right sid e descending. Stair railings and handrails shall be i nstalled in accordance with the provisions of § 1910.23. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-60634 Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

DELTA DRILLING CO., RIG # 103

Petitioner,

VERSUS

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION,

Respondent.

______________________________________________________

Petition for Review of a Final Order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (93-1452)

______________________________________________________

June 6, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Delta Drilling Company challenges an order of the Occupational

Safety and Health Review Commission finding Delta in violation of

29 C .F.R. § 1910.24 (h). 1 Giving the agency the deference it is

due in the interpretation of its own regulation, we conclude the2

commission d id not err in ruling that Delta violated this

regulation. The commission was entitled to conclude that the

regulation required that handrails guard the entire length of the

stairway. Because the handrail ended at the top tread and did not

protect the climber as he traversed the top tread, the Commission's

finding was not "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion

, or

otherwise not in accordance with law." 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A);

Corbesco, Inc. v. Dole , 926 F.2d 422, 425 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.1(a)






THIS CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON THE CONVERSION HEREOF HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNDER ANY SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE. THEY MAY NOT. BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE, PLEDGED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER. SUCH ACT OR ANY SUCH LAW.
  First China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc.
  October 4, 2010
  AMENDMENT TO THE CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE DATED OCTOBER 3, 2010
  In accordance with Article 9(b) of the Convertible Promissory Note granted on October 3, 2010 by Sierra Growth Inc. to First China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc, Sierra Growth Inc. hereby assigns the Convertible Promissory Note to Caledonia Partners LLC.  This approval of this assignment relinquishes First China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc, from any and all obligations to Sierra Growth Inc. in regard to the Convertible. Promissory Note of October 3, 2010
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company agrees to have the Promissory Note of October 3, 2010 to Caladonia Partners LLC under the same terms and conditions as agreed to with Sierra Growth Inc.
  First China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc.By:
/s/ Zhen Jiang WangName:
Zhen Jiang WangTitle:
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 Agreed and Accepted:
  HOLDERSierra Growth Inc.
  By:
/s/ Josephine AgotillaName:
Josephine AgotillaTitle:
Authorized Signatory
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-1454V

UNPUBLISHED

GARY KOELDER,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: May 23, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Jessi Carin Huff, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Matthew Murphy, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On June 9, 2021, Gary Koelder filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) as a result

of an influenza vaccine he received on December 9, 2019. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 4, 18. 

Petitioner further alleges that his vaccine injury has lasted more than six months. Petition 

at ¶12. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special 

Masters.

On May 19, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.

Specifically, Respondent states that “it is Respondent’s position that Petitioner suffered 

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

from GBS, and that he has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table 

(“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”) which afford him a 

presumption of vaccine causation if the onset of GBS occurs between three and forty-two 

days after a seasonal flu vaccine and there is no more likely alternative diagnosis and no 

apparent alternative cause. Id. at 10. Respondent further agrees that “the medical records 

demonstrate that Petitioner has experienced the residual effects of his GBS for more than 

six months.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Sandia National Laboratory Work Group

August 13, 2018 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

DISCUSSION

1. Presentation of Evaluation Report Addendum for SEC Petition 188 (1995-

1996) 

Work Group Discussion

SEC Petitioner Questions/Comments (if any)

Plans for August ABRWH meeting report

2. Update on evaluation of remaining SEC period (1997-2011)

Adjourn
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 591 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require deposits into 

the Immigration Examinations Fee Account to be subject to appropriations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2017 

Mr. BRAT (for himself, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. BABIN, 

Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. BUCK, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. EMMER, 

and Mr. BYRNE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require 

deposits into the Immigration Examinations Fee Account 

to be subject to appropriations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Use Spending for Con5 gressional Immigration Supervision Act’’ or the ‘‘USCIS 

6 Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 591 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF FEES DEPOSITED IN IMMIGRATION 

2 EXAMINATIONS FEE ACCOUNT. 

3 (a) IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.—Section 

4 286(n) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

5 1356(n)) is amended by striking ‘‘Attorney General’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘Secretary of Homeland Security, to the extent 

7 and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appro8 priation Acts,’’. 

9 (b) ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM AND IMMIGRANT

10 RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1996.—Section 641(e)(4)(B) of 

11 the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsi12 bility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1372(e)(4)(B)) is amended 

13 by striking ‘‘for the Attorney General’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

14 to the extent and in such amounts as are provided in ad15 vance in appropriation Acts, for the Secretary of Home16 land Security’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

h0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148008

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148008

COA: 310813

Macomb CC: 2011

- 002574

- FC

ANTONIO ANDRE COLBERT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

V IVIANO , J., not participating due to a familial relationship with the presiding

circuit court judge in this case.
NUMBER 13-07-743-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

HI-TECH IRRIGATION, INC., Appellant,

v.

GENE MITTAG, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Hi-Tech Irrigation, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by

the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-04,2921-E.

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the trial court has
2

granted appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the

appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of

the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal

at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 11th day of December, 2008.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 42 / Monday, March 3, 2008 / Presidential Documents 11515 

Proclamation 8222 of February 28, 2008 

Save Your Vision Week, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Early diagnosis and proper treatment of eye disease can help preserve the 

gift of sight. During Save Your Vision Week, we encourage Americans to 

receive routine vision screenings and to understand the importance of keeping their eyes healthy and safe. 

Today, millions of Americans live with some form of eye disease, such 

as glaucoma, corneal disease, macular degeneration, or diabetic eye disease. 

Individuals can help to avoid these diseases and maintain healthy eyes 

by following good eating habits, using appropriate protective eyewear, and 

maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Citizens should discuss with their physician 

the dangers of eye disease and see that their children are tested before 

their first year of school. 

My Administration will continue to seek better ways to prevent and treat 

eye diseases. The National Eye Institute’s website, www.nei.nih.gov, provides 

many resources to help Americans find information on eye disease and 

on where to find local eye-care professionals. By being proactive, Americans 

can help prevent vision loss and live healthier lives. 

The Congress, by joint resolution approved December 30, 1963, as amended 

(77 Stat. 629; 36 U.S.C. 138), has authorized and requested the President 

to proclaim the first week in March of each year as ‘‘Save Your Vision 

Week.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim March 2 through March 8, 2008, as Save 

Your Vision Week. I encourage all Americans to learn more about eye 

care and eye safety and to take measures to help ensure a lifetime of 

healthy vision. 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with MISCELLANEOUS
11516 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 42 / Monday, March 3, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth 

day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 08–941 

Filed 2–29–08; 8:58 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 25, 2019

No. 04-18-00808-CV

Rodulfo J. MENDEZ,

Appellant

v.

Jessica AGUIRRE,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CI00963

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On July 11, 2019, we ordered the court reporter to file, on or before July 22, 2019, the 

record of the September 28, 2018 hearing during which the trial court heard the Petition for 

Enforcement of Property Division. On July 22, 2019, the court reporter filed a Notification of 

Late Record in which the court reporter states “There was no record taken in this case on 

September 28, 2018.”

The appellate record is complete. Accordingly, appellant’s brief is due on or before 

August 22, 2019.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of July, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court