11680 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices 

Incorporated of San Diego, California 

(‘‘Qualcomm’’). 71 FR 39362 (July 12, 

2006). The complaint, as amended, 

alleged violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. **1337) in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, and the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain mobile telephone 

handsets, wireless communications 

devices, and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of six U.S. patents. The complaint and 

notice of investigation named Nokia 

Corporation of Finland and Nokia Inc. 

of Irving, Texas (collectively, ‘‘Nokia’’), 

as respondents. The complaint, as 

amended, further alleged that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection 337(a)(2). Only 

claims 1 and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 

5,452,473 (‘‘the ’473 patent’’), claim 1 of 

U.S. Patent No. 5,590,408 (‘‘the ’408 

patent’’), and claim 2 of U.S. Patent No. 

5,655,220 (‘‘the ’220 patent’’) remain in 

the investigation. 

On December 12, 2007, the ALJ issued 

his final ID finding no violation of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. *1337). Specifically, the ALJ 

determined that there had been an 

importation of Nokia’s accused 

products, and that none of Nokia’s 

accused products infringe the asserted 

claims of the ’473, ’408, or ’220 patents. 

With regard to claims 1 and 3 of the ’473 

patent, the ALJ determined these 

asserted claims were not proven to be 

invalid under the best mode 

requirement of 35 U.S.C. *112 or 

anticipated under 35 U.S.C. *102. The 

ALJ also determined that claims 1 and 

3 of the ’473 patent were proven to be 

invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. 

*103. With regard to claim 1 of the ’408 

patent and claim 2 of the ’220 patent, 

the ALJ determined that these asserted 

claims were not proven to be invalid. 

The ALJ determined that a domestic 

industry exists that practices the ’473, 

’408, and ’220 patents. Finally, the ALJ 

made a recommendation that if the 

Commission finds a violation under 

section 337, a limited exclusion and 

cease and desist orders should issue 

with a bond set in the amount of 100 

percent of entered value during the 60 

day period of Presidential review. 

On January 9, 2008, Qualcomm and 

Nokia each filed petitions for review. 

The Commission Investigative Attorney 

(‘‘IA’’) did not file a petition for review. 

On January 23, 2008, Qualcomm and 

Nokia filed responses to each other’s 

petitions for review. The IA filed his 

response to both petitions on January 

24, 2008. 

On February 5, 2008, Qualcomm filed 

a letter requesting that the Commission 

consider the recent Federal Circuit 

decision in Oatey Co. v. IPS, Corp., Case 

No. 07–1214, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Jan. 30, 

2008). Nokia filed a responsive letter on 

February 6, 2008. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s final 

ID and the submissions of the parties, 

the Commission has determined not to 

review the ALJ’s determination. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42–45 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42–45). 

Issued: February 27, 2008. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–4073 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

February 27, 2008, a proposed Consent 

Decree was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the District of 

Massachusetts in United States v. Bayer 

CropScience Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 

1:08-cv-10325-MLW. 

In this action, the United States filed 

a complaint, under Sections 106, 107(a) 

and 113(g)(2) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 

U.S.C. 9606, 9607(a), and 9613, alleging 

that Bayer CropScience Inc. and 

Pharmacia Corporation (‘‘Settling 

Defendants’’) are liable parties in 

connection with the Second Operable 

Unit at the Industri-plex Superfund Site 

(‘‘Industri-plex OU2’’), located in 

Woburn Massachusetts. At the same 

time as it filed its complaint, the United 

States lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree that resolves those claims and 

requires the Settling Defendants to (a) 

implement the remedy selected by EPA 

for Industri-Plex OU2 in a Record of 

Decision dated January 31, 2006, (b) pay 

EPA’s future response costs in 

connection with the Consent Decree, 

and (c) make a payment to the United 

States in the amount of $6 million in 

reimbursement of past costs incurred in 

connection with Industri-plex OU2. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Bayer CropScience Inc., D.J. 

Ref. 90–11–2–228/6. Comments may 

also be submitted by e-mail to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. A 

copy of the comments should also be 

sent to Donald Frankel, Trial Attorney, 

Environmental Enforcement Section, 

Department of Justice, Suite 616, One 

Gateway Center, Newton, MA 02458. 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney, District of Massachusetts, U.S. 

Courthouse, Suite 9200, One 

Courthouse Way, Boston, MA 02210 

(contact Bunker Henderson). During the 

public comment period, the Consent 

Decree may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy of the Consent Decree 

from the Consent Decree Library, please 

enclose a check in the amount of $14.50 

(25 cents per page reproduction cost, 

not including appendices) or $136.25 

(25 cents per page reproduction costs, 

including appendices) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury (if the request is by fax or 

e-mail, forward a check to the Consent 

Decree library at the address stated 

above). 

Ronald G. Gluck, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. E8–4112 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—SAE Consortium Ltd. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 25, 2008, pursuant to section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices 11681 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et. seq. (‘‘the Act’’), SAE 

Consortium Ltd. (‘‘SAEC’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 

East Hanover, NJ has been added as a 

party to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and SAEC intends 

to file additional written notification 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On September 27, 2007, SAEC filed 

its original notification pursuant to 

section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to section 

6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 

FR 62867). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 08–923 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT 

CORPORATION 

NeighborWorks America; Regular 

Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine 

Act 

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Tuesday, March 

4, 2008. 

PLACE: 1325 G Street NW., Suite 800, 

Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005. 

STATUS: Open. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate 

Secretary, (202) 220–2376; 

ehall@nw.org. 

AGENDA: 

I. Call to Order 

II. Approval of the Minutes 

III. Summary Report of the Audit 

Committee 

IV. Summary Report of the Corporate 

Administration Committee 

V. Summary Report of the Finance, 

Budget and Program Committee 

VI. Financial Report 

VII. Chief Executive Officer’s Quarterly 

Management Report 

VIII. Connecticut Housing Finance 

Agency Nondiscrimination 

Resolution 

IX. Field Operations Presentation 

X. Adjournment 

Erica Hall, 

Assistant Corporate Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 08–943 Filed 2–29–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7570 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste 

and Materials; Meeting Notice 

The Advisory Committee on Nuclear 

Waste and Materials (ACNW&M) will 

hold its 187th meeting on March 18–20, 

2008, at 11545 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Maryland. 

Tuesday, March 18, 2008, Room T–2B3 

8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening 

Remarks by the ACNW&M Chairman 

(Open)—The Chairman will make 

opening remarks regarding the conduct 

of today’s sessions. 

8:35 a.m.–5 p.m.: Discussion of 

ACNW&M Letter Reports (Open)—The 

Committee will discuss proposed 

ACNW&M reports on matters 

considered during previous meetings: 

(1) Review of ICRP Publication 103—

The 2007 Recommendations of the 

International Commission on 

Radiological Protection (ICRP); (2) NRC 

2007 Strategic Assessment of the LowLevel Radioactive Waste Regulatory 

Program; (3) Scope of the Working 

Group Meeting on Managing LowActivity Radioactive Waste. 

Wednesday, March 19, 2008, Room 

T–2B3 

8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening 

Remarks by the ACNW&M Chairman 

(Open)—The Chairman will make 

opening remarks regarding the conduct 

of today’s sessions. 

8:35 a.m.–10:30 a.m.: Use of Burnup 

Credit for Licensing Spent Fuel 

Transportation Casks (Open)—The 

Committee will hear presentations by 

and hold discussions with 

representatives of the NRC Office of 

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, 

Division of Spent Fuel Storage and 

Transportation, regarding the use of 

burnup credit (BUC) and the progress in 

resolving BUC issues for licensing spent 

fuel transportation casks. 

10:45 a.m.–5 p.m.: Discussion of 

ACNW&M Letter Reports (Open)—The 

Committee will continue to discuss 

potential and proposed ACNW&M letter 

reports from earlier discussions as well 

as a potential letter on the Use of 

Burnup Credit for Licensing Spent Fuel 

Transportation Casks. 

Thursday, March 20, 2008, Room T–2B1 

8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening 

Remarks by the ACNW&M Chairman 

(Open)—The Chairman will make 

opening remarks regarding the conduct 

of today’s sessions. 

8:35 a.m.–5 p.m.: Discussion of 

ACNW&M Letter Reports (Open)—The 

Committee will continue to discuss 

potential and proposed ACNW&M letter 

reports. 

Procedures for the conduct of and 

participation in ACNW&M meetings 

were published in the Federal Register 

on September 26, 2007 (72 FR 54693). 

In accordance with those procedures, 

oral or written views may be presented 

by members of the public. Electronic 

recordings will be permitted only 

during those portions of the meeting 

that are open to the public. Persons 

desiring to make oral statements should 

notify Dr. Antonio F. Dias (Telephone 

301–415–6805), between 8:15 a.m. and 

5 p.m. (ET), as far in advance as 

practicable so that appropriate 

arrangements can be made to schedule 

the necessary time during the meeting 

for such statements. Use of still, motion 

picture, and television cameras during 

the meeting may be limited to selected 

portions of the meeting as determined 

by the ACNW&M Chairman. 

Information regarding the time to be set 

aside for taking pictures may be 

obtained by contacting the ACNW&M 

office prior to the meeting. In view of 

the possibility that the schedule for 

ACNW&M meetings may be adjusted by 

the Chairman as necessary to facilitate 

the conduct of the meeting, persons 

planning to attend should notify Dr. 

Dias as to their particular needs. 

Further information regarding topics 

to be discussed, whether the meeting 

has been canceled or rescheduled, as 

well as the Chairman’s ruling on 

requests for the opportunity to present 

oral statements and the time allotted 

therefore can be obtained by contacting 

Dr. Dias. 

Video teleconferencing service is 

available for observing open sessions of 

ACNW&M meetings. Those wishing to 

use this service for observing ACNW&M 

meetings should contact Mr. Theron 

Brown, ACRS/ACNW&M Audio Visual 

Assistant (301–415–8066), between 7:30 

a.m. and 3:45 p.m., (ET), at least 10 days 

before the meeting to ensure the 

availability of this service. Individuals 

or organizations requesting this service 

will be responsible for telephone line 

charges and for providing the 

equipment and facilities that they use to 

establish the video teleconferencing 

link. The availability of video 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES