alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VIRGINIA: In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond, on Wednesday, the 15th day of November, 1995.

City of Suffolk, Appellant, against Record No. 951459 Circuit Court No. CL92000679 Mildred B. Carter, Appellee.

From the Circuit Court of the City of Suffolk

Upon consideration of the record, the petition for appeal, and the argument of counsel for the petitioner, the Court is of opinion that there is error in the judgment from which this appeal is taken. Consequently, an appeal is awarded the petitioner from the judgment rendered by the Circuit Court of the City of Suffolk on May 16, 1995 in a certain civil action in which Mildred B. Carter was plaintiff and the City of Suffolk was

defendant. The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment against the City for personal injuries sustained when she tripped and fell on a sidewalk alleged to have been negligently maintained by the City. There was a grade separation between two sidewalk sections measuring five-eighths of an inch. The Court is of opinion that as a matter of law the City was not liable in damages for the plaintiff's injuries sustained as the result of the slight defect in the sidewalk. City of Roanoke

v. Sutherland , 159 Va. 749, 754-55, 167 S.E. 243, 244-45 (1933).

Accord City of Virginia Beach v. Young , Record No. 942221,- 2 - decided July 6, 1995 (city not liable for injuries sustained bypedestrian who fell on alleged sidewalk defect consisting of oneinch height difference between sidewalk sections). Accordingly, the circuit court's judgment is reversed and annulled, and final judgment is entered for the petitioner.

This order shall be certified to the said circuit court and shall be printed in the Virginia Reports. A Copy,

Teste:

David B. Beach, Clerk
Newly Issued 

Documents and 

Relevant 

Supplemental Topics 

for Discussion

Kathleen Behling

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health, Subcommittee for Procedure Reviews

November 3, 2021
Newly issued reports not tasked for 

SC&A review

◆ ORAUT-RPRT-0097, rev. 00, “Breathing Zone to 

General Area Air Concentration Ratios in Small 

Workrooms”

– Issued to evaluate data from several air sampling 

studies performed in small workrooms

2
Newly issued PERs not tasked for 

SC&A review

◆ DCAS-PER-0090, rev. 00, “Grand Junction Operations Office”

– External and internal exposure pathways impacted

◆ DCAS-PER-0092, rev. 00, “Weldon Spring Plant”

– Changes to environmental intakes and onsite ambient doses and 

uranium-234 intakes added

◆ DCAS-PER-0093, rev. 00, “Texas City Chemicals, TBD 

Rev. 01”

– Ingestion intakes during residual period increased

3
BRS report issues

◆ Reports generated in the BRS have limitations:

– No indication of cancelled documents

– No indication of revised documents

– No indication of new documents

◆ Entry of “no findings” shows in report as finding

4
NIOSH communications

◆ Cancelled documents

◆ Revised documents

◆ New documents

5
BRS clarity 

◆ Documentation of SCPR discussions about some 

reviews lacks clarity

– ORAUT-OTIB-0052, “Parameters to Consider when 

Processing Claims for Construction Trade Workers”

– ORAUT-OTIB-0020, “Use of Coworker Dosimetry Data 

for External Dose Assignment”

◆ Update BRS during full Board finalization process

6
Followup concerns

◆ Closure of “In Abeyance” findings

– ORAUT-OTIB-0017, “Interpretation of Dosimetry Data 

for Assignment of Shallow Dose”

– NIOSH-OVER-0009, “Skin Exposure”

– ORAUT-OTIB-0011, “Tritium Calculated and Missed 

Dose Estimates”

◆ Closure of findings with followup requests

– ORAUT-OTIB-0082, “Dose Reconstruction Method for 

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia”

7
Prioritizing SCPR-closed documents 

for Board review

◆ November 2021 handout of SCPR-approved 

document reviews pending Board review includes:

– Approved documents with no findings

– Date of reviewed document

– Comments column to provide document status and/or 

recommendation for full Board review 

◆ Handout sorted by comment column to assist in 

selection of SCPR-approved documents for Board 

review

8
Presidential Documents

13431 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 50 

Thursday, March 13, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2008–14 of March 7, 2008 

Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs Related to 

Kenya 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the 

United States, including sections 2 and 4(a)(1) of the Migration and Refugee 

Assistance Act of 1962 (the ‘‘Act’’), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601 and 2603), 

and section 301 of title 3, United States Code: 

(1) I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is 

important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act, in 

an amount not to exceed $4.9 million from the United States Emergency 

Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions 

to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees and 

Migration of the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs in 

Kenya and for Kenyan refugees in neighboring countries; and 

(2) the functions of the President in relation to this memorandum under 

section 2(d) of the Act, and of establishing terms and conditions under 

section 2(c)(1) of the Act, are assigned to you, and you may further assign 

such functions to any of your subordinates, consistent with applicable law. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, March 7, 2008. 

[FR Doc. 08–1027 

Filed 3–12–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES6GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (file numbers 333-28217 and
333-28215) of our report dated March 2, 2000 (except as to Note 19 for which
the date is March 6, 2000), on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31,
1999 and 1998, and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997,
which report is included in this annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

                                       Robinson Burdette Martin & Cowan, L.L.P.


Lubbock, Texas
March 6, 2000
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL  OFFICER PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter H. Jackson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
annual report of Intraware, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that such annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by such annual report.

|Dated: June 12, 2003 |  | By:    |  | /s/PETER H. JACKSON                                                
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Peter H. Jackson                                                   
|                     |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intraware, Inc. and will be retained by Intraware, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

I,
Wendy A. Nieto, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of
Intraware, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that such annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by such annual report.

|Dated: June 12, 2003 |  | By:    |  | /s/WENDY A. NIETO                                                                         
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Wendy A. Nieto                                                                            
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President of Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intraware, Inc. and will be retained by Intraware, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We have issued our report dated June 21, 2022, with respect to the financial statements and supplemental information included in the Annual Report of Aviation Communications and Surveillance Systems 401(k) Plan on Form 11-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. We consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-232482).


/s/ Buchbinder Tunick & Company LLP


Bethesda, MD


June 21, 2022
**Exhibit23**

 

 

IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of SG Blocks, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8****(FILENO. 333-201469) of our report which includes an explanatory paragraph as to the Company’s ability to continue as a goingconcern, dated March 30, 2015,**** with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of SG Blocks,Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K/A of SG Blocks, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2014 to be filed on or about March 31, 2015.

 

/s/ Marcumllp

Marcum llp

New, York,NY

March 31,2015
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Locan, Inc., for the quarter ending December 31, 2008, I, Ronald D. Long, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Locan, Inc.  Dated:  October 25, 2010   LOCAN, INC.  By:/s/  Ronald D. Long
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 4916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service


Flight 93 National Memorial Advisory Commission; Notice of Public 
Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Flight 93 
Advisory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that a meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory 
Commission (the Commission) will be held on Saturday, February 2, 2008 
from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (Eastern). The Commission will meet jointly with 
the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force. The joint meeting will be held at 
the Somerset County Courthouse, Courtroom <greek-i>1; 2nd floor, 111 
East Union Street, Somerset, Pennsylvania, 15501.
    The agenda of the meeting will include review and approval of 
Commission minutes from October 7, 2007; reports from the Flight 93 
Memorial Task Force and National Park Service; old business; and new 
business.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Comments from the public 
will be taken at the end of the meeting. Any person may file with a 
Commission a written statement concerning the matters to be discussed. 
Persons who wish to file a written statement or testify at the meeting, 
or who want further information concerning the meeting may contact 
Superintendent Joanne Hanley at 814.443.4557. Address all statements 
to: Flight 93 Advisory Commission, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 
15501.

DATES: February 2, 2008 at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Somerset County Courthouse, Courtroom <greek-i>1; 2nd floor; 
111 East Union Street, Somerset, Pennsylvania, 15501.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Joanne M. Hanley, 
814.443.4557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission was established by Public Law 
107-226 to advise the Secretary of the Interior on the planning, 
design, construction and long-term management of a permanent memorial 
at the crash site of Flight 93.

    Dated: December 14, 2007.
Joanne M. Hanley,
Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.
[FR Doc. 08-339 Filed 1-25-08: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-25-M
-1-

 
part of Lender in the exercise of any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiverthereof, nor as acquiescence in any default, nor shall any single or partial exercise by Lender ofany right or remedy preclude any other right or remedy. Borrower agrees that, without releasing orimpairing Borrower’s liability hereunder, Lender may at any time release any party primarily orsecondarily liable for the indebtedness evidenced by this Note.     The rights of Lender and obligations of Borrower hereunder shall be construed in accordancewith and governed by the laws (without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof) ofthe State of Georgia. This Note is intended to take effect as an instrument under seal underGeorgia law.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has caused this Note to be executed under seal and delivered byits duly authorized officers on the date first above written.      **HOME FEDERAL HOLDINGSCORPORATION**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7413

LESTER BROOKS MOSLEY, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

KEITH OLSON, Warden, Federal Correctional

Institution-Beckley,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge.

(CA-98-1115-5-P)

Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester Brooks Mosley, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lester Brooks Mosley, III, appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Mosley v. Olson, No. CA-98-1115-5-P (S.D.W. Va. July 8, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 57 (Monday, March 24, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15410-15411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-55507]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 31


Employment Taxes and Collection of Income Tax at Source

CFR Correction

    In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 30 to 39, 
revised as of April 1, 2007, in Sec.  31.3121(s)-1, on page 104, 
paragraph (b)(2)(iii) is corrected and, on page 107, paragraph 
(c)(2)(iii) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  31.3121(s)-1  Concurrent employment by related corporations with 
common paymaster.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iii) Examples. The rules of this subparagraph are illustrated by 
the following examples:

    Example 1. S, T, U, and V are related corporations with 2,000 
employees collectively. Forty of these employees are concurrently 
employed by two or more of the corporations, during a calendar 
quarter. The four corporations arrange for S to disburse 
remuneration to thirty of these forty employees for their services. 
Under these facts, S is the common paymaster of S, T, U, and V with 
respect to the thirty employees. S is not a common paymaster with 
respect to the remaining employees.
    Example 2. (a) W, X, Y, and Z are related corporations. The 
corporations collectively have 20,000 employees. Two hundred of the 
employees are top-level executives and managers, sixty of whom are 
concurrently employed by two or more of the corporations during a 
calendar quarter. Six thousand of the employees are skilled 
artisans, all of whom are concurrently employed by two or more of 
the corporations during the calendar year. The four corporations 
arrange for Z to disburse remuneration to the sixty executives who 
are concurrently employed by two or more of the corporations. W and 
X arrange for X to disburse remuneration to the artisans who are 
concurrently employed by W and X.
    (b) A is an executive who is concurrently employed only by W, Y, 
and Z during the calendar year. Under these facts, Z is a common 
paymaster for W, Y, and Z with respect to A. Assuming that the other 
requirements of this section are met, the amount of the tax 
liability under sections 3102 and 3111 is determined as if Z were 
A's only employer for the calendar quarter.
    (c) B is a skilled artisan who is concurrently employed only by 
W and X

[[Page 15411]]

during the calendar year. Under these facts, X is a common paymaster 
for S and X with respect to B. Assuming that the other requirements 
of this section are met, the amount of the tax liability under 
sections 3102 and 3111 is determined as if X were B's only employer 
for the calendar quarter.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iii) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see Sec.  31.3121(s)-
1T(c)(2)(iii).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 08-55507 Filed 3-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
A95A0411.

#### In the Interest of R. D. F., a child.

(470 SE2d 818)

Decided April 1, 1996.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carl P. Greenberg, Bradley J. Boyd, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellant.

*Wilma E. Espy,*for appellee.

Andrews, Judge.

In *In the Interest of R. D. F.,*216 Ga. App. 563 (455 SE2d 77) (1995) , we affirmed the juvenile court’s dismissal of the delinquency petition. In *In the Interest of R. D. F.,*266 Ga. 294 (466 SE2d 572) (1996) , the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this Court. Accordingly, our original judgment in this case is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and the juvenile court’s judgment dismissing the delinquency petition is reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*McMurray, R J., and Blackburn, J., concur.*
EX-4.16



 Exhibit 4.16 

SIXTH AMENDMENT 
 This Sixth
Amendment, effective as of the date set forth above the signatures of the parties below, amends the Exclusive Patent License Agreement dated October 24, 1997 (“AGREEMENT”) between the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(“M.I.T.”), a Massachusetts corporation having its principal office at 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA and Cheung Laboratories, Inc. 

WHEREAS, in 1997 Cheung Laboratories, Inc. was renamed Celsion Corporation, and in 2000 was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation
(“LICENSEE”), having its principal office at 10220-L Old Columbia Road, Columbia, MD 21046-2364; 
 WHEREAS, in 2006, Celsion
Corporation transferred the APA technology to a wholly owned subsidiary named Celsion Canada, having a place of business at 8320 Guilford Rd, Suite A, Columbia, MD, 21046 USA. 

WHEREAS, in 2008 Celsion Canada merged into a public listed company in Canada and renamed Medifocus, Inc. (“LICENSEE”), presently
having its manufacturing and R&D office at principal office at 10240 Old Columbia Road, Suite G, Columbia, MD, 21046 USA. 
 WHEREAS,
the AGREEMENT was previously amended March 29, 2013; and 
 WHEREAS, LICENSEE and M.I.T. wish to modify the provisions of the AGREEMENT
as amended; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereby agree to modify
the AGREEMENT as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Delete and replace Section 2.3 of the AGREEMENT with the following: 

 In order to
establish a period of exclusivity for LICENSEE, M.I.T. hereby agrees that it shall not grant any other license to the PATENT RJGHTS for the EXCLUSIVE FIELDS OF USE, and also that it shall not grant any other license to the COPYRIGHT for the
EXCLUSIVE FIELDS OF USE, subject only to Paragraphs 2.5 and 2.6 and to the royalty-free, non-exclusive license rights of the United States Government pursuant to 48 CFR 52.227-14 (Civilian Agencies) and DFARS 252.227-7013 (Defense Agencies) during
the period of time commencing with the EFFECTNE DATE and abandonment or expiration of the PATENT RIGHTS. 
  

	 	2.	The remaining terms and conditions of the LICENSE AGREEMENT remain intact. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed under seal by their
duly authorized representatives. 
 The Effective Date of this Sixth Amendment is July 15, 2013. 

 

									
	/S/ Lita Nelson	 		 	/S/ John Mon
					
	By:	 	 Lita L. Nelson
	 		 	By:	 	 John Mon

				
	MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY	 		 		 	
					
	Title:	 	 TECHNOLOGY LICENSING OFFICER
	 		 	Title:	 	 COO
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgeworth Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for three month period ended June 30, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, G.J. de Klerk, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

       1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 14, 2011

                                         By:  /s/ G.J. de Klerk
                                              -------------------------------
                                              G.J. de Klerk
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)