alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To the Board of Trustees of
Pioneer Tax-Free Income Fund:

In planning and  performing  our audit of the  financial  statements  of Pioneer
Tax-Free  Income Fund for the year ended  December 31, 1997, we  considered  its
internal control structure, including procedures for safeguarding securities, in
order to determine our auditing  procedures  for the purpose of  expressing  our
opinion on the financial  statements and to comply with the requirements of Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control structure.

The management of Pioneer  Tax-Free Income Fund is responsible for  establishing
and   maintaining   an  internal   control   structure.   In   fulfilling   this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of internal control  structure  policies and
procedures.  Generally,  controls  that are relevant to an audit  pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial  statements for external purposes that
are  fairly   presented  in  conformity  with  generally   accepted   accounting
principles.   Those  controls   include  the   safeguarding  of  assets  against
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent  limitations in any internal  control  structure,  errors or
irregularities  may  occur  and may not be  detected.  Also,  projection  of any
evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that it may
become inadequate  because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of
the design and operation may deteriorate.

Our  consideration  of the  internal  control  structure  would not  necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal  control  structure  that might be material
weaknesses  under standards  established by the American  Institute of Certified
Public  Accountants.  A material  weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of the specific internal control structure elements does not reduce to
a relatively  low level the risk that errors or  irregularities  in amounts that
would be  material in relation to the  financial  statements  being  audited may
occur and not be  detected  within a timely  period by  employees  in the normal
course of performing  their  assigned  functions.  However,  we noted no matters
involving the internal control  structure,  including controls over safeguarding
securities,  that we consider to be material  weaknesses  as defined above as of
December 31, 1997.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                              /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
February 2, 1998
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

 

Azure Power Global Limited 

C/o AAA Global Services Ltd 
 1st
Floor, The Exchange, 18 Cybercity, Ebene, Mauritius 
  
  

COMPANY NUMBER: 127946 C1/GBL 
  

																			
	     CERTIFICATE NUMBER
	  		  		  		  		  		  	NUMBER OF SHARES
		  		  		  		  		  		  		  		  	
		  	 	  		  		  		  		  		  		  	 	  	

 INCORPORATED ON THE 30TH JANUARY 2015 UNDER THE COMPANIES
ACT 2001 OF MAURITIUS 
 This is to certify that .............................................................. of
................................................... is the registered proprietor of .............................................................................................., numbered as under, subject to the Companies Act 2001. 

 

													
	 	 	DISTINCTIVE NUMBERS	  	NUMBER OF	  		 		  	
	 	 	FROM	  	TO	  	SHARES	  		 	This XXth MM YYYY	  	
	 	 	 	  		 		  	
	 	 	 	  	 	  	 	  		 		  	
	 	 	 	  	 	  	 	  		 		  	
		 		  		  		  		 	.....................................	  	.....................................
		 		  		  		  		 		  	
		 		  		  		  		 	Director	  	Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.01



Certifying Statement of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mindy Kline, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. and will be retained by Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





April 30, 2009



___/s/Mindy Kline_____________

Mindy Kline

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer
# FILED
December 7, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk SUPREME CO URT, NASHVILLE

EDMUND GEORGE ZAGORSKI, ) ) Appellant, ) ROBERTSON C IRCUIT ) NO. 6052 Below V. ) ) NO. 01S01-9711-CC-00240 STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Court of Criminal Appeals Appellee. ) Affirmed ) )
JUDGMENT This case was heard on the r ecord on appeal from the Court of Cr iminal Appeals , applic

ation for permiss ion to ap peal hav ing her etofore b een gra nted, br

iefs and argument of counsel; and upon consi deration thereof, this Court i s of the opinion that the appellant was afforded both ef fective and competent assistance in the guilt and sentencing phases of trial.
In accordance with the opi nion filed herein, it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the Court of Crimina l Appeals is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Robertson County for the execution of the judgmen t of this Court and the colle ction of costs acc rued belo w.
Unless stayed by thi s Court or other appropri ate authority, the sentence o f death shall be carried out as provided by law

on the 15th day of April, 1999. The previous order direc

ting the sentence of death to be car ried out on February 28, 1999, is hereby vacated.
It appearing that the appellant is indigent, costs of appeal will be paid by the State of Tennessee.

12/07/98
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1021

___________ Al Jabbar Salam, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Crystal Evans, ARO, East Arkansas * District of Arkansas. Regional Unit, ADC (originally sued * as Evans); Marvin Evans, Jr., Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED] East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; * Tiffanye Compton, Grievance * Coordinator, ADC; Marvin Irby, * * Defendants-Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: July 22, 2004 Filed: August 2, 2004

___________ Before MELLOY, LAY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
This matter comes on appeal wherein the Plaintiff filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the Defendants, which include Marvin Evans, former Warden of the East Arkansas Regional Unit of the Arkansas Department of Corrections, Crystal Evans, a former grievance officer, and Tiffanye Compton, an appellate grievance-2- officer, failed to process and respond to several grievances that he had filed. The district court dismissed the Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Having reviewed the record, we affirm the district court on the grounds set forth by the United States Magistrate Judge who originally recommended that the case be dismissed. See Jones v. Norris , 310 F.3d 610, 612 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (standard of review).

______________________________
VIRGINIA:

 In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court 

Building in the City of Richmond, on Wednesday, the 15th day of 

November, 1995. 

City of Suffolk, Appellant, 

 against Record No. 951459 

 Circuit Court No. CL92000679 

Mildred B. Carter, Appellee. 

From the Circuit Court of the City of Suffolk 

 Upon consideration of the record, the petition for appeal, 

and the argument of counsel for the petitioner, the Court is of 

opinion that there is error in the judgment from which this 

appeal is taken. Consequently, an appeal is awarded the 

petitioner from the judgment rendered by the Circuit Court of the 

City of Suffolk on May 16, 1995 in a certain civil action in 

which Mildred B. Carter was plaintiff and the City of Suffolk was 

defendant. 

 The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment against the 

City for personal injuries sustained when she tripped and fell on 

a sidewalk alleged to have been negligently maintained by the 

City. There was a grade separation between two sidewalk sections 

measuring five-eighths of an inch. 

 The Court is of opinion that as a matter of law the City was 

not liable in damages for the plaintiff's injuries sustained as 

the result of the slight defect in the sidewalk. City of Roanoke

v. Sutherland, 159 Va. 749, 754-55, 167 S.E. 243, 244-45 (1933). 

Accord City of Virginia Beach v. Young, Record No. 942221, 
- 2 - 

decided July 6, 1995 (city not liable for injuries sustained by 

pedestrian who fell on alleged sidewalk defect consisting of oneinch height difference between sidewalk sections). 

 Accordingly, the circuit court's judgment is reversed and 

annulled, and final judgment is entered for the petitioner. 

 This order shall be certified to the said circuit court and 

shall be printed in the Virginia Reports. 

 A Copy, 

 Teste: 

 David B. Beach, 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          44,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,332
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,387
<PP&E>                                          11,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,144
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,648
<CGS>                                          109,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (390)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (583)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
Status of Upcoming

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Pe

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

January 28, 2014

Kansas City, MO
Purpose

 Provide an update to the Advisory Board on 

current number of qualified petitions under

evaluation and sites being evaluated throug

83.14 process

 Provide SEC information to the Advisory Boa

support of its preparations for future Work G

sessions and Advisory Board meetings
SEC Summary Table

(as of January 13, 2014)

 Petitions received  Petitions in qualification process  Petitions qualified for evaluation 

• NIOSH evaluation in progress 0

• NIOSH evaluation completed 130

– SEC Evaluation Reports

with the Advisory Board

for recommendation 8

 Petitions not qualifying for evaluation Note: Petitions not qualifying include five petitions received prio

rule becoming final and Petition SEC‐00034 (site was de‐lis
SEC Petition Currently under Adv

Board Review

 Petition Evaluations the Advisory Board has 

action on, but are under continued evaluatio

• Hanford• Los Alamos National Laboratory

• Savannah River Site

• Nuclear Metals Inc.

• Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co.

• Oak Ridge National Laboratory• Rocky Flats Plant
SEC Petition Currently under Adv

Board Review—cont.

 Petition Evaluations with the Advisory Board 

initial action:

• Kansas City Plant
Potential SEC Petitions (83.1

 Sandia National Laboratory – Albuquerque (

1948)

 General Atomics (modify existing class defin

 Dayton Project Monsanto (modify based on 

in facility designation)

• Modify based on change in facility designation t

facility

• Modify to add the 9 month period when operati

being shifted from “The Dayton Project” to Mou
SEC Petitions in

Qualification/Evaluation

Qualification Process Linde Air Products – 1945‐1947Evaluation Process None
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         9,661
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  73,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,864)
<INVENTORY>                                    102,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,769
<PP&E>                                         86,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (16,593)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 398,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,074
<BONDS>                                        157,793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    21,202
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   398,058
<SALES>                                        538,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               538,881
<CGS>                                          475,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  475,857
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               49,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5840 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5840

 To state the policy of the United States with respect to the extended 
nuclear deterrence posture of the United States in support of NATO and 
 to direct the Secretary of Defense to provide Congress a briefing on 
                             such posture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2018

 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself and Mr. Sarbanes) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in 
   addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To state the policy of the United States with respect to the extended 
nuclear deterrence posture of the United States in support of NATO and 
 to direct the Secretary of Defense to provide Congress a briefing on 
                             such posture.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENDED NUCLEAR DETERRENCE POSTURE IN SUPPORT OF NATO.

    (a) Statement of Policy.--It is the policy of the United States 
to--
            (1) maintain a modernized nuclear capability that provides 
        for effective deterrence against peer, near-peer, and regional 
        adversaries, consistent with the national security interests of 
        the United States;
            (2) extend the nuclear deterrent of the United States to 
        deter aggression against close allies of the United States, 
        including members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 
        (NATO); and
            (3) ensure the highest levels of reliability, credibility, 
        safety, and security for all nuclear weapons of the United 
        States, including those forward-deployed in support of NATO.
    (b) Briefing.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the 
Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Senate, and to any other congressional defense committee (as defined in 
section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) upon request, a 
briefing regarding the current status of, and future plans for, the 
extended nuclear deterrence posture of the United States in support of 
NATO.
                                 <all>
```
1

Employment and Cancer Information as 

Reported by the Department of Labor

Energy Worker: Jane Doe

NIOSH Tracking Number: XXXXX

The Department of Labor has provided NIOSH with personal employment and 

cancer information for your claim. NIOSH will use the information listed below to 

assist in completing the dose reconstruction for your claim. 

You do not need to take any action at this time if the employment and cancer 

information is correct. If the information below does not appear to be correct, 

please contact the Department of Labor at 216-802-1300. 

It is important to contact the Department of Labor with all changes and/or 

corrections because NIOSH cannot make changes or corrections to 

employment or cancer information unless directed to do so by the Department 

of Labor. 

If the employment or cancer information listed below is not correct, it could lead 

to an incorrect final compensation decision by the Department of Labor. NIOSH 

will make any necessary revisions to your case file once the employment and/or 

cancer information is verified by the Department of Labor. 

Employment Information 

The Department of Labor has provided NIOSH with employment information for 

your claim. The following information is a summary of the information NIOSH 

received. Please verify that the facility and dates are correct. If any 

employment information appears to be missing or changes need to be made, 

please contact the Department of Labor at the telephone number listed above. 

Facility Start Date End Date

Facility Name XX/XXXX XX/XXXX

Facility Name XX/XXXX XX/XXXX

Facility Name XX/XXXX XX/XXXX
2

Cancer Information 

The Department of Labor has provided NIOSH with primary cancer information 

for your claim. The following is a summary of the information NIOSH received. 

Please verify that the cancer type, date of diagnosis, and number of cancers 

are correct. If any cancer information appears to be missing or changes need 

to be made, please contact the Department of Labor at the telephone number 

listed above. 

 

Type of Cancer Date of Diagnosis

Cancer type XX/XX/XXXX

Cancer type XX/XX/XXXX

Cancer type XX/XX/XXXX

Cancer type XX/XX/XXXX

NOTICE—This communication may contain private, confidential, or privileged 

information intended for the sole use of the person to whom it is addressed. Any 

use, review, distribution, copying, or any action taken in reliance upon this 

information is strictly prohibited if you are not the person to whom the 

communication is addressed. If you have received this communication in error, 

please contact NIOSH immediately at (800) 356-4674, (513) 533-XXXX, or 

ocas@cdc.gov.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of HALL TEES, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  August 5, 2010





/s/ William Lewis





Name: William Lewis


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  August 5, 2010





/s/ William Lewis





Name: William Lewis


Title:  Chief Financial Officer