8 with NI¢

9 DR. DEHART: Jim, is there

iV f pDabiy as
11
12 would be
Ss 14 these comment

y just minor technical

with ]
17 know, how < or
18 something of

little better - better time that
21 DR. MELIUS: But the

DR. NETON: I uld go with past history,
maybe. Y history would t |

25 DR. MELIUS: T guess is there a



ard t e that
k f if th ind of
r I ii
DR. ZIEMER: want £
‘ e 2 ar
a 1 w ina 4 at z:
f and t this informatio of

MR. FITZGERALD:

DR. ZIEMER: ne thing we d



ran identify things, that's

DR. MELIUS:

after a meeting if

MR. ELLIOTT:

DR. MELIUS:

Inaudible)

we sent something (Inau

DR. ZIEMER:

DR. MELIUS:

we -- I don’t think

UNIDENTIFIED:

NANCY

LEE & ASSOCIATES



with, you kr , we f
hat, but we ha *¢
wheather 26s Amporta

wi

want, even if you d

we

pr ate 1
ain I
i or 2
e decidi
that’

whethe
know

wha
Ta



MR.

DR.

MR.

DR.

MR.

DR.

MR.

FITZGERALD:

ZIEMER: =

FITZGERALD:

ZIEMER:

FITZGERALD:

ZIEMER:

FITZGERALD:

ATES



H

nN

w

res)

@

wi

DOSE RECONSTRUCTION REVIEW PROCESS

DR. ZIEMER: I want to t

delineate the items we need to address here

have the

ion of our initial

We have agreed to t

+¢€ a to a ere x to 2e re a
Thompson relating to the Special Exposure
rule-making. And it’s been requested that
the group look at or review the letter that
wrot to several Congressmen. Were there

ten t we need to lo E k tt

need to addr

DR. MELIUS: Let me -- I mean

list one sort of

yntract issue.

had sugg

cedurally since that

and not get in trouble.
DR. ZIEMER: Right, we can look at tha

database - and my guess is that -- based

we have

in a month and it’s easier to

yn what



and edg t t pe 11
id It wk if tft ma a

DR. MELIUS: Just f wW p



ificat

DR. NETON:

MR. ELLIOTT:

DR. MELIUS: If I recal ight

MR.

Pet is ha - a

MR. TURCIC: oo a E at wa



DR.

DR.

DR.

MR.

DR.

MR.

MELIUS: Yeah

ZIEMER: D

MELIUS: T

1ing f
ing wit

m Neton’s
h site x f
i e si
ided rf La y

ELLIOTT:

ZIEMER: Yes

ELLIOTT: I

ip} a
k ur



or it if I don’t know what it i

that’s the dilemma that, you know, T

3 have to at least look inf«

the

1 jetermine what‘’s there and whether t's
5 or not, and that’s the part where lL

we have some challenges. But you know,
7 persistence and knowing the right kind
8 juestions and being able t work with ¢t
| think, you know, we certainly will get

1¢ DR. ZIEMER:

Any o stions

rmatio

n tc

think clearly

again,
he Board, I

11 Toe omments?

12 (No responses)

13 Thank you very much We appreciate the

14 exchange this morning. As you know, we wil be
5 deliberating this afternoon and you will hear ba
Le rom us after that those delit ations

his co C

tion,

May want

with the issue of the si

19 We

it’s

id, almost bre

Pe

1 break. ple are getting a litt

resume k you
3 (Whereupon, a recess was taken.
24
25 BOARD DISCUSSION/WORKING SESSION

NANCY LEE & ASSOCIATES



MR.

4
rt
i

When we dig and do samples and ve



DR. NETON: Wher there are --

MR. ELLIOTT: by usly lowa Ordnance Plant

s not close
DR. NETON: N

DR. ZIEMER: Mark?

MR. GRIFFON: Ye I x efore
ir lat, had a questic x

arification ny say i", that
S at 2} ca iy e a 2
Yes, been signed y OCA
and k t ur web or w be
i a ly as an get



on what ¢t

swer to

DR. MELIUS:

DR. ZIEMER:

MS. MUNN: It

we



ry, and I
MR. FITZGERALD: Right.

DR. MELIUS: ended up -

MR. FITZGERALD: Sav



ira)

DR. ZIEMER: Now I thi

t sing a sit
at we uld as S
th w the ur are have bee
liated I that fair In «
e 1 w ld ther Los
DR. DEHART: I’m not sure wher look
he --
w audited

DR.

DR.

DR.

DR.

DR.

ZIEMER:

DEHART:

ZIEMER:

DEHART:

ZIEMER:

s t look
as I l :