e's EGrG ROCKYFLATs

Employee #
Bldg 771
First Shift

UE # 90-0594
November 14, 1990
Corrective Action

Corrective Action Training Notification
In response to training action requested for the UE # 90-0594, double containment of any
contaminated material or equipment is a job duty requirement for Building 771.
Through qualification training, administered to the chemical operations group, doublé
containment of contaminated Items Is a train to, and test to item, that must be successfully
completed within the training programs.
Be advised that all contaminated materials and/or potentially contaminated
materials handled in Building 771 MUST be double contained. Elther in two bag
form, or bag to ridged container.

Training reference material:

ROI 7.2 Section 6.5.4 and 6.5.5
WO-4034 Page 10-4 NOTE

Please sign and date one of the two copies you have just received and retum it to MPT, T-771B,
no later than December 7, 1990.

To request additional training on this Building requirement, please check below and you will be
contacted by MPT for further training.

| request additional training on the above information.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Employee Signature Date


To: All Employees

Subject: Annual Occupational Radiation Dosimetry Report ~

Attached is the annual report of thi
the way that this information is Bel
controlling, limiting, and reporting radiation exposures,

ational radiation exposure you received during 1990. You will notice some major changes in
5 ‘DOE teduirem ita DAE :Order 5480.11) for

The new system Includes a method to combine exterrial ahd intern itor‘ial oFgan'doses are multiplied by organ specitic
weighting factors which account for the relative radiosensitivity of each irradiated organ. These weighted organ doses are then added
to the contribution from external radiation to provide a resulting quantity that is a measure of the total risk of adverse health effects from
radiation exposure. The resulting quantity is called the “effective dose equivalent.” The DOE limit for the annual effective dose equiva-
lent is 5000 millirem.

Dose Received in 1990. ‘ e ~

Your occupational radiation exposure for 1990 is reported to you in terms of the effective dose equivalent, The. external;and intern:
components of the effective dose equivalent are also reported separately for your information. ‘The external component of the effective.
dose equivalent is obtained from information processed from your dosimetry badge and Is the radiation dose received by your body
from radiation sources outside (external to) your body. The interna! component of the effective dose equivalent is obtained from
information processed through bioassay samples « or body counts, or both. Radionuclides in the body may cause exposure for an
extended period of timé.aftér an. intake pacuts: (In most basés, the dase eenty 1990 Is the result of intakes prior to 1990.
The effective dose equivalent for. 1 in if you did not submit a bioassay sample or
have a body count in 1990. ~ ae 7

The new system retains sep:
both skin and extremities is

ies-{hatids or feet). The DOE limit for
asured by the dosimetry badge. ‘The dose to

Under the new system the dose equivalent limit to any tissue or organ is 50,000 millirem in a calender year. The dose equivalent to the
organ with the highest dose is reported to you. The organ dose equivalent is the sum of dose equivalents from both external and
internal radiation exposure.

Cumulative Dose at Rocky Flats id

The new system requires a determination of the cumulative effective dose equivalent, which is the sum of the annual effective dose,
equivalerits recorded for each year since the effective date of DOE Order 5480.11, that is, starting in calendar year 1989. There is no
DOE limit on cumluative effective dose equivalent.

Committed Effective Dose Equivalent.

al

The new dose system includes the concept of the committed effective dose equivalent, which is the effective dase équivalart that'a’
person is projected to receive over 50 years following an intake (intemal deposition) of radioactive materials. At Rotky-Flats:itie

primary way an intake may occur is by inhalation of airborne radionuclides or by wounds Involving radioactive materials. Jatakes:are,
assessed from bioassay, body count, and wound count information. If you receive a confirmed intake(s) in 1990, the:projected: dos:
over 50 years from that infake(s) is reported to you as the committed effective dose equivalent: There is no DOE limit on the committed
effective dose equivalent.

Projected.internal Effective Dose Equivalent:

If you have internal deposition fro evious | intakes that are project ou wil
effective dose equivalent in 1991 | f'you'de Het receive'any-newintakes. In previous fepositk
as the systematic deposition (or systemic burden) or as the lung dose equivalent (or, in sorne Yep ‘a@s.the
new sytem, we are now calculating and reporting to you the Internal component of the effective dose equivalent that you are expected
to receive in 1991 from these long term depositions that are in your body at the first of the year. Because the new DOE order limits the
total effective dose equivalent to 5000 millirem, your external component of the effective dose equivalent plus internal doses from any
new intakes will need to be controlled to 5000 millirem minus the projected intemal dose for 1991.

if you have any questions, ask you supervisor or the Radiological Engineering representative for your area,


RFP KH 900901
June 1, 1999
Page 2

Your fully compliant response to this request for proposal is due by close of business on
Monday August 9, 1999 or B-4. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned at

or by fax at.

Jeff Kuxhausen
Subcontract Administrator

Attachment:
As stated


KAISER* HILL

COMPANY

June 1, 1999

Integrated Safety Services, L.L.C.
420 Corporate Circle, Suite Q
Golden, CO 80401-5600

Attn:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (KH 900901) FOR FIRE SYSTEMS INSPECTING AND
_ TESTING, STATEMENT OF WORK REVISION 1, DATED April 29, 1999.

Kaiser-Hill, Company, L.L.C. requests a Firm Fixed Price proposal for Fire Systems
Inspection and Testing. The subcontractor is requested to submit a Firm Fixed Lump
Sum Price as well as a per line item price as shown on Attachment B-1. This will allow
K-H to award any or all subparts to a subcontractor. The Statement of Work, dated April
29, 1999 and the Terms and Conditions are attached.

K-H is requesting a Firm Fixed Price for the first nine months only (September 30, 1999
—June 30, 2000). All other periods will be negotiated on an annual basis. The second
period will be for fifteen months (July 1, 2000 — September 30, 2001). The next four
periods will be for a duration of one year each. The proposal will include, but is not
necessarily limited to, all direct labor, fringe benefits, overheads, general and
administrative costs and fee/profit. There is no provision for travel or per diem in this
subcontract.

The Solicitation Schedule is as follows:

Issue RFP 6/1/99
Pré-Proposal Conference/Site Tour . 16/28/99
Intent to Propose/Reps & Certs/FOCI 7712/99:
Questions Due > 7119/99"
Answers Resolved > 7/2/99 &
Proposal Due : “8/9/99 =~
Evaluation Complete ~  *$/23/99" 3
SSO Determination 8/24799°. .

- 8/30/99" -

tart Transition

Complete Transition

Kaiser-Hill Company, L.L.C.
Courier Address: Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, State Hwy. 93 and Cactus, Reeky Flats, CO 80007 + 303.966.7000
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 464, Golden, Colotado 80402-0464


ANNUAL-OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION-DOSIMETRY-REPORT - =
CALENDAR YEAR 1990°° ** me
DATE OF REPORT: 03-34-1991. .

NAME: a vs
EMPLOYEE NUMBER: SOCIAL SECURITY NO.:.

ORGANIZATION CODE: 74425
Vo GEG : ;
~ 49%.

BIRTHDAY:

DOE ANNUAL DOSE oo:
STANDARD RA NA 5060 sac
DOSE RECEIVE!
IN 1990°° 75

CUMULATIVE DOSE
AT ROCKY FLATS*

COMMITTED: EFFECTIVE
DOSE EQUIVALENT: ~
FROM INTAKES ~
OCCURRING:AN 1990

PROJECTED INTERNAL
DOSE FOR 1991



_ DISTRIBUTION
HEALTH PHYSICS Orig.
Rockwell International a

. 4. ROCKYFLATSPLANT AREA SUPT.
repert# _Z271- @4-__ RADIATION MONITORING REPORT BLDG. a
at DG MO NO i eipeNT ; BODYCOUNTER.
OATE blo Lily & POSSIBLE INHALATION DIRECTOR___ ‘
Time oFoccuR. £ 2 3. OG PROCEDURE VIOLATION 0.0.E. _
- = IMMED. SUPER 3
RADIATION MONITORING DESCRIPTION OF FINDINGS: IND. SAFETY _
room J/4___aiove sox #_/ 3/64 otnen woTane LOUK » FILE ;
INSTRUMENT WORKING ?7_/Z 5 ___ SAAM# SAAM C/M OTHER :
_ PERSONNEL INVOLVED SKINGONTAMINATION' Wont booed “BODY CouNT
NAME. INO. _
NAME. ——No.
NAME. “
NAME.
20 £ O [> ToRE Cotamrn MED st RE asoy =_

Laon lmn SMERE 400 50 £eIT OF floek ws KFECTER THE AREA bu
RECANER TQ £2509m SMEAR. NO SovRsE of THE SMT HMTHATEON Caf 4S FOUND.

L SR 3albs , t.turBOBIED Dili, TH wet ToL D APEA ay
LLL Pio Porta Al. Li: A

MONTTOR'S SIGNATURE : EMPLOYEE # "RADIATION MONITORING: SUPERVISOR” ” EMPLOYEE #

INVESTIGATION REQUIRED YES 2" NO - _ BY:
THIS FORM TO BE FILLED OUT AND RETURNED WITHIN 24 HOURS TO RADIATION MONITORING SUPERVISION

1ESPONSIBLE S//PERVISOR'S FINDINGS Ab fire, liashtas fists, “Gna Ynn =|
BA Saud cot pipe ct he Led chapte hana —
te scaled raneela b ote

Kido ts ocesct

RECTIVE ACTION: LAME Haley Da Liles Lael fling ait
De 4in fo. rata LLL L

<A
DATEL =~ 50

hag
RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISOR SIGNATURE . . -7! LOVEE #
Total Man Hours —________ Cost of Materials

WF eA6466 (12/84)



On appeal, as he did in the district court, Wood frames the
issue as "whether the Secretary of Labor's decision not to
bring an enforcement action, despite having found a violation
under 29 U.S.C. s 660(c), is reviewable." Appellant's Br. at
2. We review the dismissal of Wood's complaint de novo.
Gilvin v. Fire, 259 F.3d 749, 756 (D.C. Cir. 2001). In
deciding a purely legal question, we need not adopt the
reasoning relied upon below.

Information, statements and data submitted in compliance with provisions of the Act or these
regulations are subject to title 18, section 1001, of the United States Code, which provides:

Section 1001. Statements or entries generally.

Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and
willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious
or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to

contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not
more than five years, or both.


xd States Govemment _ Department of Energy “|

‘morandum Fawr Pak ots

XN

APR 25 1996
f  AMGO:HRIMD:MA4345
Moratorium on the Destruction of Records

All Rocky Flats Bayirdnmental Technology Site Employees. _
Effective immediately, Iam issuing a moratorium on the destruction ofall récords at the “*
Flats Environmental Technology Site, including the records located at the Denver
Federal Record Center. Until further notice, no destruction will take. place of any records
unless approved by the RFFO Chief Counsel’ .

The following definition applies to all Departmental records including those created, .
received, and maintained by contractors pursuant to their contracts. Virtually all recorded
information in.the custody of the Goverment (including information held by contractors
which is-considered by contract:to be Goyernment information) regardless of its media is
considered “Government records.” Records can be described’as any:

- «_ books, papers, maps; photographs, machine:readable materials, or
, other documentary ‘materials, regardless ‘of physical.’ form:.or
characteristics, made_or received by an-agency-of: thezUnited=Stites .
Government under Bederal-Jaw orin-connection, swith: 4168 -———____——___
of. public business-and preserved, or-approptiate:for“preservation by: .
that agency oritslegitimate successor-as-evidencesofthe-organization, .
* functions, .pdlicies, decisions, procedures, operations, -or other
activities of the Goverment or because of the informational value of
the data in them.” (44 U.S.C.°3301). . :

a

“Records” include document originals and official file copies, but'’do not include courtesy
copies or blind courtesy copies. Employees are reminded that personal files must be
clearly designated as nonofficial and filed Separately from official records.

Questions conceming this moratorium may be directed to the RFFO Records Management
Team, at extension 3200. . .

eee Sil ele —
er


o >

qo7rmo9d

KAISER-HILL
TERMS & CONDITIONS
- INDEX

Solicitation, Offer and Subcontract Award Form (RFPD-1)

Services and Prices/Cost
B.1: Firm Fixed Rates (FFP)

Statement of Work (SOW)/Specifications

- Packaging and Marking

Inspection and Acceptance

Deliveries or Performance

Subcontractor Administrative Data :
Attachment G-1 Special Billing Instructions .

Special Subcontractor Requirements
Subcontract Clauses
List of Attachments

—-ILOTMOOWYS

NOVOZSrRe

Release and Certification of Final Payment

Monthly Accrual Report Format

S & H Evaluation Worksheet

Medical Surveillance Acknowledgement Form

Monthly Contractor Injury/liness Statistics Report
Contractor Controlled Insurance Program (CCIP) Manual
Employee Confidentiality Agreement

Sample Certificate of Place of Abode

Quarterly Small Business/Small Disadvantaged Business Lower-
Tier Subcontracting Report

List of DOE Directives

Contract Service Act Wage Determination

Moratorium on the Destruction of Records

Fire System Technician Qualification Card

Prerequisite Training Verification Forms

Job Specific Training Verification Forms

Performance Evaluation Forms

Govemment Furnished Equipment

Representations and Certifications

Instructions to Offerors
Appendix L-1 Specific Instructions

Subcontract Award Criteria


eMrvoreet

INVUCLIKINATIUN CNEURSNEC! MAN NUMBCN welt ee see
INITIAL REQUIREMENT FOLLOW. UP INITIAL REQUIREMENT Torow 1p TNITIAL REQUIREMENT (Out ite
———_- FREQUENCY -_-eeaoaa TE REQUENCY —_—_—_—_—
and Buildings — tant ard Uuutdngs (ec a) — Security:
\AM alarms and response to them lyr. 10. Eye bath location. 2yrs. 17. Documents. Qyrs
clear Criticality alarms and response to them _tyr 11. ye Protection Requirements ayrs. 18, Process paperwork G 2yrs
re alarms, reponse, notification. tyr. 42. Plant rules / Supplementary Building Rules ayrs. 19, Parts. Yoe 2yrs
nergeney notieation/actions pertinent 997/ tY"- 13.Critleaity requirements ayre. 20. Geuges and tooling AWE ayes.
nergerey maytemsonvactions peninent 99// 14, Self - monitoring equipment ayes.
see manunt___Laancren PO ___ayrs. 15. Qualitative respirator iltting (smoke test) issue prior 21. Other
re extinguisher location, Qyrs. to or during initial building Indottrination.
ardous materials (ist on back), ayrs. 16. A quantitative respicator fit test by Respiratory Specity
res hozards_ aye Protection aye
afety shower location ayrs
TYPE OF INDOCTRINATION (Check Block) *
ZTST eT se?) 6] 8 [10] | 12) 13] 4] 15] 16] 17] 16] 19] 20] a
atoa.| | DATE | qployee's Signature | | Supervisors Signeture
VY AAV Avy (eA AA) pe} Fe)

Hn
[45120 (9/82) Supersedes FF-25810.38900,40660, 42480, 45400, 45900, 46099. 46124


Internal Letter él Rockwell International

Date

To

SUBJECT -

December 4, 1989 No. « FBI-1-9705
(Nathe, Organization, Internal Address) FROM (Name, Orgenizetion, intemal Address, Phone)
; . J val McNett
Bulking 71 ~ Bulking 114
PERSONNEL FILES

As you may know, grand jury subpoenas have been served upon Rockwell International
demanding the production of various documents. Among the documents Specifically Sought
was your personnelfile. vee ee ee

” Rockwell International either has produced oris in the process of oroduin your personnel

files, which may include files maintained-by your department, to the grand jury. Our outside
counsel have advised us that there is simply no legal basis to refuse this production. We

~-have maintained copies of these files, and you are welcome to review the tiles produced as >>". =

they relate to you. ff you wish to review your files please contact Dea McCart in Legal,
extension 7017, and arrange a time. Also, our outside counsel are available to discuss this
matter with you if you so desire.

Ee Veh
. F. McNett
Chief Counsel


- fl eGeG ROCKY FLATS

INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

DATE: May 22, 1991
TO: “ot .
FROM: g. R. Marschall, Maintenance, Building 334, xs —

SUBJECT: I&E PROJECTS -. JRM-036-91

I want to take this opportunity to express my gratitude for the
efforts you, your foremen and your crews put. forth to complete the
I&E Projects in a timeframe that was near to impossible. The
efforts and positive attitude of your crews have gone a long way
in establishing that "can do" image to the rest of the Plant.

You and your people can be extremely proud of your accomplishments;
I certainly am. Thank you.

nh