alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KEITH WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

PENELOPE WILLIAMS,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-403

[November 27, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Janis Brustares Keyser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502014DR003451XXXXMB.

Abigail Beebe of The Law Office of Abigail Beebe, P.A., West Palm 

Beach, for appellant.

Daniel J. Koleos of Koleos Rosenberg McMahon P.L., Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
A I J Irl

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST CIRCUIT

2022 CA 0979

SHERMA.N WILLIAMS

VERSUS

ANALYTIC STRESS RELIEVING, INC. AND CF INDUSTRIES

NITROGEN, LLC. 

DATE OF JUDGMENT. MAR 13 2024

ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

PARISH OF ASCENSION, STATE OF LOUISIANA

NUMBER 118417, DIVISION C

HONORABLE KATHERINE TESS STROMBERG, JUDGE

Robert Campbell Counsel for Plaintiff -Appellee

Baton Rouge, Louisiana Sherman Williams

Malcolm J. Dugas, Jr. 

Gonzales, Louisiana

Ernest Paul Gieger, Jr. 

John E. W. Baay, I1

Morgan A. Druhan

New Orleans, Louisiana

F. Dominic Amato

Denham Springs, Louisiana

Counsel for Defendant -Appellant

Analytic Stress Relieving, Inc. 

Counsel for Intervenor -Appellee

Apache Industrial Services, Inc. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, THERIOT, CHUTZ, WOLFE, AND HESTER, JJ. 

Disposition. MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED AND APPEAL DISMISSED. ANSWER

DISMISSED. 
CHUTZ, J. 

Defendant -appellant, Analytic Stress Relieving, Inc. (ASR), appeals the trial

court' s judgment, granting in part a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict

JNOV) raised by plaintiff -appellee, Sherman Williams. Williams filed an answer to

the appeal that he wished to have the court consider in the event it "reverses the trial

court' s Wiling on the motion for [JNOV]." 

Prior to oral argument before the fivejudge panel, ASR advised the court that

the matter had settled. In a letter signed by counsel for both ASR and Williams, the

parties jointly withdrew their request for oral argument noting, "We have resolved this

matter with [Williams), via settlement this morning." The letter also stated that counsel

for both Williams and ASR "have signed this letter ... confirming our settlement" 

ASR subsequently filed a motion to dismiss its appeal. Williams also sent

correspondence stating that he had no objection to the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, 

the motion to dismiss is granted and ASR' s appeal is dismissed. 

Because this court did not reverse the trial court' s ruling on its JNOV grant, the

answer is moot. See Cat' s Meow, Ina a City ofNew Orleans, 98- 0601 ( La. 10/20/98), 

720 So.2d 1. 186, 1193 (" A case is ` moot' when a rendered judgment or decree can

serve no useful purpose and give no practical relief or effect"). Accordingly, we

dismiss the answer. 

DECREE

For these reasons, we grant ASR' s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal. 

The answer is dismissed. Each party is to bear their own costs. 

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED AND APPEAL DISMISSED. 

ANSWER DISMSSED. 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summay financial  information extracted from Pro-Fac
     Cooperative,  Inc.  Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 28,  1998 and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000202932      
<NAME>                        Pro-Fac Cooperative
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Jun-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  Jun-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-28-1998
<CASH>                             2,859
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                     56,385
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                      152,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 243,088
<PP&E>                           270,909
<DEPRECIATION>                    63,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   591,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            158,919
<BONDS>                          160,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                331
<PREFERRED>                       88,705
<COMMON>                           8,932
<OTHER-SE>                        44,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     591,744
<SALES>                          542,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 542,219
<CGS>                            389,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    389,078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 106,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                23,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   22,693
<INCOME-TAX>                       6,794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               15,899
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      15,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

NANCY CUSSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00085-MP-GRJ

BUTLER DEVELOPMENT CO LLC, S CLARK BUTLER PROPERTIES LAND TRUST, S

CLARK BUTLER PROPERTIES LTD,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 4, Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to

Plaintiff’s Complaint by Butler Development Co., LLC, S. Clark Butler Properties Land Trust,

and S. Clark Butler Properties Ltd. Defendants request an enlargement of time until June 17,

2011 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Plaintiff does not oppose

the requested extension of time. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendants’ Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s

Complaint, Doc. 4, is GRANTED.

2. Defendants must respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before June 17, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of June, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00085-MP-GRJ Document 5 Filed 06/07/11 Page 1 of 1
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3141

_____________________________

WILLIAM COPELAND,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

Wade Mercer, Judge.

September 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Greg Caracci, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jason W. Rodriguez, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                    ------------

    Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules13(a)-14(a) and 15(d)-14(a)
      as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Steve Schneider, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ZAP;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this anual report.

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date:  March  31, 2006                 By: /s/ Steve Schneider
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Steve Schneider
                                           Director and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 15.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement on Form F-3, File No. 333-164007, as amended, filed by Knightsbride Tankers Limited and subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our reports dated March 17, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of the Company and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Knightsbridge Tankers Limited and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement.











/s/ MSPC Certified Public Accountants and Advisors


A Professional Corporation


New York, New York





March 18, 2011
Summary – OCAS-TIB-002, Rev. 00 1 SC&A – January 20, 2011 

Overview of

TRITIUM CALCULATIONS WITH IMBA

(OCAS-TIB-002, Rev. 0) 

Workers at certain Department of Energy and Atomic Weapons Employer facilities have the 

potential of receiving a radiation dose to their whole body and their internal organs from tritium, 

a radioactive form of hydrogen known as an isotope. At these facilities, tritium, which can be 

present in several different chemical forms, may unknowingly be inhaled or ingested by eating or 

drinking. While in the body, the tritium undergoes radioactive decay, which contributes to the 

total radiation dose received by the tissues and organs. 

The Tritium Calculations with IMBA (OCAS-TIB-002) technical information bulletin (TIB) 

provides guidance on how to calculate doses to the body and internal organs due to tritium. Dose 

reconstructors are required by the governing regulations to use the best available science, 

including guidance provided by the International Commission on Radiological Protection 

(ICRP). A computer code (i.e., computer program) called IMBA (Integrated Modules for 

Bioassay Analysis) is used to facilitate the calculation of internal doses using the methods and 

assumptions recommended by the ICRP. The exposure to specific organs is determined using 

IMBA and the associated assumptions provided in the computer code. The ICRP has specified 

five different categories of tritium compounds; however, many of these compounds are classified 

as gases or vapors. While IMBA currently includes tritium, it does not yet handle gases and 

vapors. It is, nonetheless, possible to utilize IMBA to calculate doses for these compounds if 

certain procedures are followed. The TIB provides instructions for performing these 

calculations.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RESULTING FROM THE TECHNICAL REVIEW

The technical contractor for the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) 

reviewed the TIB and produced the two findings summarized below: 

Finding #1: The TIB is inconsistent in referencing certain ICRP publications. 

Finding #2: The instructions provided for handling IMBA’s inability to handle gases and vapors 

directly are cumbersome under certain circumstances. 

RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS

In response to the findings identified above, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and 

Health (NIOSH): 

(1) Agreed with Finding #1. The TIB’s reference section does not contain all the references 

used and mentioned in the document, and does contain some references not used in the 

document. This will be corrected in a future revision of the TIB. 
Summary – OCAS-TIB-002, Rev. 00 2 SC&A – January 20, 2011 

(2) Agreed with Finding #2. Instructions for handling gases and vapors are a bit 

cumbersome, but provide correct results. The Advisory Board’s technical contractor 

independently verified the procedure by following it and duplicating its results with 

another computer program. The procedure will be modified in a future revision of the 

TIB. 

All issues were resolved to the satisfaction of the Board.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

F.A., by and through his Next Friend, 

Freddie Sims., et al., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cv198/RS-WCS

MIKE HANSEN, in his official 

capacity as Acting Director for the

Agency for Persons with Disabilities,

et al., 

Defendants.

__________________________________

ORDER

Before me is Defendant’s Motion for Expedited Order Granting Enlargement of 

Time for Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and 

Requiring Plaintiffs to Produce Witnesses for Depositions on Class Certification 

Evidence (Doc. 45).

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiffs shall respond to the Motion not later than October 18, 2011. 

2. Defendants shall have until not later than October 31, 2011, to file their response 

to the Motion to Certify Class (Doc. 41). This deadline may be further extended 

depending on the outcome of the Motion (Doc. 45). 

Case 4:11-cv-00198-RS-WCS Document 46 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED on October 11, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00198-RS-WCS Document 46 Filed 10/11/11 Page 2 of 2
Page | of 1

Miller, Diane M. _ ; _ _

From:
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:48 PM
To: NIOCINDOCKET@cdc.gov

Subject: Dose Reconstruction

Your plan for dose reconstruction although necessary where records don't exist, makes no sense at Rocky
Flats. DOE with the aid of a credited laboratory reviewed our records and assigned new doses based upon
their research. Members of the 100 mrem club and others, such as my self, had their records researched.
Nuetron dose changes and internal doses, indicators and review of air sampling and wound counts finally were
interpreted correctly. these records are now inadequete according to NIOSH. How do you know what workers
received without reviewing their records?

Save your money so you can continue to help" identify workers and residents that don't have curent files on
the work force for example at Coors, documents were either stolen or destroyed, depending on whims of

managemnt .

1/18/2002
Exhibit 10.6


 


Power of Attorney


 


 


I, the undersigned,
LI Suzhen, Chinese nationality, ID Num.: hold 7% equity interest in Qinghai Hua You Downhole Technology
Co., Ltd. (“QINGHAI HUAYOU”). As a shareholder of QINGHAI HUAYOU, I hereby irrevocably entrust Recon
Hengda Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (“RECON HENGDA”) to execute the following
rights during the term of this Power of Attorney:


 


I, the undersigned, exclusively authorize
RECON HENGDA as the sole representative with full authority to perform shareholder’s rights upon the equity interest I hold,
including but not limited to: (i) the attendance of the shareholder’s meeting and the execution of relative Shareholder Resolution(s)
of QINGHAI HUAYOU for and on behalf of me; (ii) the performance of all my rights associated with the ownership of equity conferred
by laws and Articles of Association of QINGHAI HUAYOU including but not limited to voting-rights and the rights of assigning, transferring,
pledging or disposing of such equity interest partially or wholly; and (iii) the designations and appointments of Legal Representative,
Chief Executive Director, Directors, Supervisors, General Manager and/or other Officer(s) of QINGHAI HUAYOU on my behalf.


 


RECON HENGDA is entitled to execute the
Transfer Agreement mentioned in the Exclusive Equity Interest Purchase Agreement within its authority and duly perform the Equity
Interest Pledge Agreement and the Exclusive Equity Interest Purchase Agreement that are entered into simultaneously with this Power
of Attorney by me. The execution of the abovementioned rights shall not constitute any limitation on this Power of Attorney.


 


Save as otherwise provided hereunder, RECON
HENGDA is entitled to exercise all the necessary rights arising from the equity interest upon its own discretions without any oral
or written instructions of me.


 


All acts associated with my equity interest
in QINGHAI HUAYOU conducted by RECON HENGDA shall be deemed as the acts of me. All documents executed by RECON HENGDA shall be
deemed as executed by me, I shall acknowledge such documents.


 


RECON HENGDA is entitled to assign all
rights under this Power of Attorney. RECON HENGDA is entitled to entrust any other individual(s) or legal entity(s) to execute
the above rights and equity interest without issuing any notice to or obtaining any prior consent from me. Nevertheless, RECON
HENGDA shall report to me immediately after such assignment and the assignment shall not harm any of my rights or vested interests
in any event.


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

  


This Power of Attorney shall be irrevocable
and continuously valid so long as I am a shareholder of QINGHAI HUAYOU and shall come into effect as of the date set forth below.


 


During the term of this Power of Attorney,
in the event that I intend to perform the rights hereunder, I shall negotiate with RECON HENGDA in advance.


 


 


 


 


LI Suzhen


 


Signature: /s/ Li Suzhen


 


Date: December 1, 2015.


 






    	 	2
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Vita Food Products, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 31, 2003                        /s/ Stephen D. Rubin
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                        Stephen D. Rubin,
                                                            President
                                                  (Principal Executive Officer)
Presidential Documents

29977 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 101 

Friday, May 23, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8258 of May 20, 2008 

A Day of Solidarity With the Cuban People, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of worship are among 

the liberties that Americans cherish. Our Nation fully supports the brave 

people who work to secure these liberties in the countries where they 

are denied. And on this Day of Solidarity with the Cuban People, we 

focus our attention on the men and women working to secure freedom, 

democracy, and human rights for the citizens of Cuba. 

For half a century, the Cuban people have suffered under oppressive dictatorship. Under the rule of Fidel and Raul Castro, Cubans have seen their 

political freedoms denied, their economy reduced to shambles, and their 

families torn apart. The Cuban people deserve better—and the American 

people stand with them as they work to achieve it. 

The United States is rallying the free world to the cause of Cuban liberty. 

We continue to shine a bright light on the Castro regime’s abuses—and 

America calls on the Government of Cuba to immediately and unconditionally release all prisoners of conscience. 

We keep these prisoners, their families, and all Cubans in our prayers. 

Especially on this Day of Solidarity, we ask the Almighty to comfort and 

strengthen those who suffer under the Castro dictatorship—and to hasten 

the day when Cuba’s suffering comes to an end. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 21, 2008, as A 

Day of Solidarity with the Cuban People to recognize those who are suffering 

in Cuba, especially Cuba’s prisoners of conscience. I call upon the citizens 

of the United States to mark this observance with appropriate ceremonies 

and activities that demonstrate America’s resolute support for those living 

under the Castro regime. 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES2
29978 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day 

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08–1296 

Filed 5–22–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>