alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     Project 1099. *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0183. *Description:*
                     A voluntary program which provides State Child Support Enforcement agencies, upon their request, access to the earned and unearned income information reported to IRS by employers and financial institutions. The IRS 1099 information is used to locate noncustodial parents and to verify income and employment. *Respondents:*
                     State IV-D programs. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of
                             respondents
Number of
                             responses per respondent
Average
                             burden hours per response
Total burden hours1099 Record specifications
54
12
1.96
1,270IRS Safeguarding Certification Letter
54
1
.48
26
 *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*
                     1,296. *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.* *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Fax: 202-395-6974, Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families. Dated: January 25, 2008. Janean Chambers, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 08-446 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### Simon VASQUEZ-CONTRERAS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 78-1672

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 3, 1978.

Jones, Davis & Craig, Paul W. Jones, Jr., Austin, Tex., for petitioner.

Griffin B. Bell, Atty. Gen., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Philip Wilens, Chief, Rex L. Young, James P. Morris, Attys., Govt. Reg. & Labor Section, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Eric A. Fisher, Atty. Crim. Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Joe F. Staley, District Director, Immig. & Nat. Service, San Antonio, Tex., Troy A. Adams, Jr., Dist. Director, Immig. & Nat. Service, New Orleans, La., for other interested parties.

*335Before GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH and HILL, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; *see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner petitions this court to review an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals denying to the petitioner a new grant of voluntary departure and dismissing an appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s motion to reopen the deportation proceedings against him. Our review is limited to the determination of whether the denial of petitioner’s motions was an abuse of discretion. *Gena v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,*424 F.2d 227, 232 (5th Cir. 1970). We hold the Board’s order of December 14, 1977 was not an abuse of discretion. “Although an abundance of administrative patience has prolonged petitioner’s presence in this country, the time has come to write finis to these proceedings.” *Id.*at 233.

The order of the Board is affirmed and the petition for review is dismissed.

DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CurrencyShares Singapore Dollar Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: June 9, 2010



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Joseph Arruda            
|Joseph
Arruda*               
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is
a trust and Joseph Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
En

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

1150 Tusculum Ave

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH. 

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D. 

 Madison, Wisconsin 

Josie Beach 

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson 

 Rexburg, Idaho 

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa 

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D. 

 New York, New York 

Richard Lemen, Ph.D. 

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D. 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

Wanda I. Munn 

 Richland, Washington 

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. 

 College Station, Texas 

David B. Richardson, Ph.D. 

 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D. 

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico 

Loretta R. Valerio 

 Santa Fe, New Mexico 

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

October 25, 2017

The Honorable Eric D. Hargan

Acting Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Indepen dence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Acting Secretary Hargan:

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

completed its evaluation of Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00046 

concerning workers at the Feed Materials Production Center at Fernald, 

Ohio, under the statutory requirements established by the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 and 

incorporated into 42 C.F.R. § 83.13.

 

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for the 

following two groups of workers:

“(1) All employees of the Department of Energy (DOE), its 

predecessor agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors who 

worked in any area of the Feed Materials Production Center at 

Fernald Ohio, from January 1, 1984, through December 31, 1989; and 

(2) all employees of the DOE, its predecessor agencies, National Lead 

of Ohio, or NLO, Inc., in any area of the Feed Materials Production 

Center from January 1, 1979, through December 31, 1983.” 

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and 

other information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with 

sufficient accuracy for members of these two groups of workers, and 

therefore a class covering these groups should not be added to the SEC. 

The Board concurs with this determination.

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the August 23 and 

24, 2017, Board meeting held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, the Board 

recommends that this class not be added to the SEC.

Enclosed is the documentation from the Board meeting(s) where this SEC 

class was discussed. The documentation includes copies of the petition, 

the NIOSH review thereof, and related materials. If any of these items are 

unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

[Signature on File]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Noble Medical Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the
“Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: May
24, 2010




/s/ George ElliottGeorge
      ElliottChief
      Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




Date: May
24, 2010




/s/ Charles BentzCharles
      BentzChief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)
463 A.2d 31

#### Commonwealth v. McClennon, Appellant.

Argued March 24, 1983.

Edward M. Kopanski, for appellant; Robert Ciaffa, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before HESTER, JOHNSON and POPOVICH, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Exhibit
      32





**PARADISE
      MUSIC & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Paradise Music & Entertainment, Inc.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Kelly T. Hickel, the Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer,
      Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of the Company.





/s/
                Kelly T. HickelKelly
                T. HickelChairman
                of the Board(Principal
                Executive Officer,Principal
                Financial Officer,Principal
                Accounting Officer)




Date:
      February 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of H&H Imports, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  February 11, 2011

| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                      
| |                                                      
| | /s/ STEVEN ROGAI                                     
| | Steven Rogai                                         
| | Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
296 S.E.2d 899

#### Donna M. WHITTINGTON v. TURNPIKE FORD, INC.

No. 15308.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

May 28, 1982.

*770Bradley J. Pyles, Logan, for appellant.

John L. MacCorkle, Charleston, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by Donna Whittington from an order of the Circuit Court of Kana-wha County awarding her $1,000.00 as an attorney fee in an action for breach of warranty which she brought against Turnpike Ford, Inc. In this proceeding the appellant contends that the $1,000.00 award was inadequate. In opposition to the appellant’s position, Turnpike Ford argues that the appellant accepted money in satisfaction of the attorney fee award and that she is not entitled to have the award reviewed on appeal. We agree with Turnpike’s position, and we dismiss the appeal heretofore granted.

The appellant sued Turnpike Ford, Inc. for breach of warranty and damages arising out of her purchase of a 1976 Chevrolet. After extensive litigation a jury returned a verdict in the appellant’s favor for $3,500.00. The Circuit Court entered judgment for the appellant on that verdict and on a related verdict.

By way of post-trial motion the appellant moved for an award of an attorney fee as authorized by the Federal Act on which the substantive cause of action was based. 15 *U.S.C.A.,*2301, *et seq.*In support of the motion she submitted documentation of the hours spent by her attorneys on the litigation. After examining the documentation the court, on March 25, 1981, awarded the appellant an attorney fee of $1,000.00.

Subsequently, the appellant, to collect the $1,000.00 fee, and interest on it, procured a Writ of Execution and a Suggestee Execution from the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Pursuant to the Suggestee Execution, the Charleston National Bank, the Suggestee, paid the appellant’s attorney $1,041.91, in satisfaction of the attorney fee award, and an order in satisfaction of the judgment was entered on April 24, 1981.

On appeal Turnpike Ford claims that the appellant’s subsequent appeal of this issue is precluded by her issuing execution and obtaining satisfaction of the $1,041.91 judgment for attorney fees. Our rule governing such situations is set forth in syllabus point 5 of *Mr. Klean Car Wash, Inc. v. Ritchie,*161 W.Va. 615, 244 S.E.2d 553 (1978):

> “ ‘It is a general rule that a litigant who enforces, or *otherwise accepts*the benefit of a judgment, order, or decree cannot afterward *have it reviewed for error,*or deny the authority which granted it.’ Syllabus, *Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v. Lane,*113 W.Va. 51, 166 S.E. 698 (1932) [Emphasis in original]”

*771We believe that under this rule the appellant is precluded from challenging the amount of the award made by the lower court.

For the reason stated the appeal heretofore granted will be dismissed as having been improvidently awarded.

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 11
                                ---------------



                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



                              Year ended March 31,


                                          2001           2000          1999
                                     -----------    -----------    ----------

  Basic and diluted average shares
    outstanding                        7,727,109      6,936,066     6,909,292



  Net income (loss)                  $(2,310,837)   $(6,351,740)   $   42,943


  Basic and diluted income (loss)
    per share                        $     (0.30)   $     (0.92)   $     0.01
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 of
Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Flurida
      Group, Inc.Dated:
      May 21, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Jianfeng
      DingJianfeng
      DingChief
      Executive Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Michael Heil, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ J. Michael Heil By: J. Michael Heil Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: November 15, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

128949 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver (64) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128949 COA: 252185 Marquette CC: 03-040456-FC STEVEN EDWARD TIERNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of February 27, 2006 is considere d, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

l0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 2057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-66]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosures of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, Tissue Engineering.
    Date: March 11, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Head Marriott, One Hotel Circle, Hilton Head 
Island, SC 29928.
    Contact Person: John K. Hayes, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 959, Democracy Two, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 451-3398, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#563e372f33253c163b373f3a78383f3e78313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="791118001c0a13391418101557171011571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 4, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-66 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>