alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 13, 2014 518528 

________________________________

In the Matter of DAMECHA 

HARRIS,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF 

SECURITY PICCOLO, as Hearing 

Officer, et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________

Damecha Harris, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County)

to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and

Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating

certain prison disciplinary rules.

After petitioner was placed in a double bunk cell, he

became agitated and told a correction sergeant to "get him out of

his cell [or] he was going to inflict serious damage." 

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing to

double bunk and making threats and, following a tier III

disciplinary hearing, was found guilty as charged. The

determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this

CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
-2- 518528 

We confirm. The misbehavior report and testimony of the

sergeant who authored it provide substantial evidence to support

the determination of guilt (see Matter of McFadden v Prack, 120

AD3d 853, 854 [2014], lv dismissed 24 NY3d 930 [2014], lv denied

___ NY3d ___ [Oct. 23, 2014]; Matter of Bridgeforth v Fischer, 69

AD3d 1068, 1068-1069 [2010]). While petitioner and the employee

witnesses at the hearing offered somewhat differing accounts of

the incident, such created credibility issues for the Hearing

Officer to resolve (see Matter of Williams v Fischer, 84 AD3d

1661, 1662 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 711 [2011]). The record

does not demonstrate that the Hearing Officer was biased against

petitioner or that the determination flowed from the purported

bias (see Matter of Bridgeforth v Fischer, 69 AD3d at 1069). 

Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent they are

properly before us, have been examined and found to lack merit.

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of Amscan Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Gerald
C. Rittenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Michael A. Correale, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                          /s/ Gerald C. Rittenberg
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Gerald C. Rittenberg
                                          Chief Executive Officer

                                          /s/ Michael A. Correale
                                          --------------------------------
                                          Michael A. Correale
                                          Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2005
ex-10.1

 PROMISSORY NOTE
 

 

  October 26, 2015
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Nogales Resources Corp., a Nevada Corporation, promises to pay Misael Aguirre, on or before December 31, 2018, the amount of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) in the currency of the United States, plus simple interest on the principal amount of this Promissory Note accrued at a rate of 6% per annum.
 

 

 Time shall be the essence of this Promissory Note.
 

 This Promissory Note shall be governed by and constituted in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada.
 

 

 NOGALES RESOURCES CORP.
 

 

 Per /s/ Misael Velasco Aguirre
      Misael Velasco Aguirre, Pres., CEO, CFO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 00-4297

ANTHONY BONNER, a/k/a Tone,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.

(CR-98-424)

Submitted: November 9, 2000

Decided: March 2, 2001

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Anton J. S. Keating, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A.

Battaglia, United States Attorney, Angela R. White, Assistant United

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Anthony Bonner pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess

with intent to distribute cocaine and crack cocaine, in violation of 21

U.S.C.A. § 846 (West 1999). The district court sentenced Bonner to

a 122-month prison sentence to be followed by five years of supervised release. Bonner appeals, challenging the calculation of his criminal history category. He asserts that the district court clearly erred in

finding that he committed the instant offense while on probation for

a state conviction, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.1(d)

(1998), and that the instant offense occurred less than two years after

his release from confinement. See USSG § 4A1.1(e). The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that Bonner

waived his right to appeal. We grant the Government’s motion and

dismiss the appeal. 

In his plea agreement, Bonner waived the right to appeal any sentence imposed, including any issues that relate to the establishment of

the guideline range, reserving only the right to appeal an upward or

downward departure. The district court accepted Bonner’s guilty plea

at a hearing conducted in accordance with Rule 11 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed Bonner’s plea agreement and the Rule 11 colloquy and find that Bonner made a knowing

and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal. United States v.

Broughton-Jones, 71 F.3d 1143, 1146 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing standard). 

Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

2 UNITED STATES v. BONNER
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5784 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2650 North Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. 

Drive in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Vel R. Phillips Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5784 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. VEL R. PHILLIPS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2650 North Doctor Martin Lu4 ther King Jr. Drive in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, shall be 

5 known and designated as the ‘‘Vel R. Phillips Post Office 

6 Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Vel R. Phillips Post 

11 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 7, 2019

No. 04-19-00274-CV

In the Interest of D.L. III, D.L., D.A.R. and D.G.,

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00708

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, 

which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Appellant’s brief was originally due on May 30, 2019, but has not been 

filed. 

We ORDER appellant’s attorney to file appellant’s brief on or before June 27, 2019. If 

appellant’s brief is not filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an 

abandonment hearing. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013(a)(1) (giving indigent persons a 

right to counsel in parental-rights termination cases); In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex. 

2003) (holding that this right to counsel includes the right to effective counsel).

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of June, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Miller, Diane M.

From: _ vp ,

Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:38 PM
To: NIOSH Docket Office

Subject: NTS Site Profile No. 029

Dear Sirs:

After reading the NTS Site Profile, | note that there Is no mention of the
radiation exposures related to the Pluto Program which was approximately
1959 to 1963. Not to be confused with the NRDS In Area 25 (then Area 400),
Pluto was an air cooled nuclear reactor program In Area 401 (Area 25). Two
reactors were tested, Tory IIA and Tory 112C. Associated with the program
was a small nuclear reactor called "Hot Box" located In the same area. The
operation of these reactors caused significant personne! exposures In their
assembly, testing, and disassembly. Several hundred workers were involved
and | was one of them. | do not bring this up because | am claiming a
health problem related to working in this program at the NTS, but It was a
major source of personnel radiation exposure during those years at the Test
Site. For completeness of the Profile, it needs to be included. If! can be

of help, please contact me.

Very truly yours,
EX-4.1




			
		  	Exhibit 4.1
		
	Number PB-*****	  	********* Shares
		  	Series B Preferred Stock

 SUNESIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

A Delaware Corporation 
 THIS
CERTIFIES THAT **SPECIMEN** is the record holder of *********** (*****) shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder, in
person, or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned. 
 This certificate and the shares
represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation and any amendments thereto, a copy of each of which is on file at the office of
the Corporation and made a part hereof as fully as though the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws were imprinted in full on this Amended and Restated Certificate, to all of which the holder of this certificate, by acceptance
hereof, assents. 
 The Corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences
and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this *** day of *********, 20**.

  

			
	  
 Eric H. Bjerkholt,
Secretary
	  	  
 Daniel N. Swisher, Jr., President
and Chief Executive Officer









 FOR VALUE RECEIVED
                     HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO
                 SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE AND DOES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT
                     ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN
THE PREMISES. 
 DATED                      

 

	
	  

	(Signature)


 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE, IN
EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
Exhibit 32.02

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Michael Zugay, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 17, 2008

/s/    MICHAEL
ZUGAYMichael ZugaySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
A96A0083.

#### SMOAK v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES.

(471 SE2d 60)

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Eugene Smoak, Jr. appeals from an order for his arrest predicated on his failure to purge himself of contempt by paying a child support arrears. *Held:*

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b) and (d) require that appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, child custody, and other domestic relations cases must be taken by application, and that application must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order complained of. This discretionary appeals procedure is applicable to cases involving petitions to establish paternity, *Brown v. Dept. of Human Resources,*204 Ga. App. 27 (418 SE2d 404); and judgments of contempt regarding a domestic relations decree, *Russo v. Manning,*252 Ga. 155 (312 SE2d 319). “Regardless how this case was couched or pursued, it involves collection of child support moneys and it is a domestic relations matter.” *Davis v. Welch,*205 Ga. App. 462, 463 (422 SE2d 323). Thus, an application for discretionary appeal was required in the case sub judice. Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional. *Fabe v. Floyd,*199 Ga. App. 322, 332 (405 SE2d 265). *258Since Smoak has not followed the mandatory appeal procedures, his appeal must be dismissed.

Decided May 3, 1996.

*Emerson Carey, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kevin O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Harold H. Hobbs,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Johnson and Ruffin, JJ, concur.*
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6020 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 325 South Michigan Avenue in Howell, Michigan, as the ‘‘Sergeant Donald Burgett Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6020 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT DONALD BURGETT POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 325 South Michigan Avenue in 

5 Howell, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sergeant Donald Burgett Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Donald 

11 Burgett Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    May 13, 2011
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,
As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to such officers knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2005 of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. (the Company) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such annual report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |        |                                       
| | ------ | --------------------------------------
| |        | /s/ Leonardo Porciúncula Gomes Pereira
| |        |                                       
| | Name:  | Leonardo Porciúncula Gomes Pereira    
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer               
| | Date:  | May 31, 2006                          

---
### DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

_______________________

ANQUAN DEWAYNE WALTERS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D22

- 2148

July 26, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellant's motion to recall mandate is granted, and the mandate

entered on February 26, 2024, is hereby recalled. The opinion entered

January 26, 2024, is hereby withdrawn. The attached opinion is

substituted for the original opinion.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A

TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.

MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL

CLE RK

### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

ANQUAN DEWAYNE WALTERS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D22

- 2148

July 26, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico,

Judge

.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Special

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant

.

Susan Dmitrovsky of Kuehne Davis Law, P.A., Miami, of counsel, for

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs

Cline, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM

.

Affirmed. See Maye v. State

, 368 So. 3d 531 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023).2

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

__________________________

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
EXHIBIT 23



<PAGE>



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by Reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-109617) of Energas Resources, Inc. of our
report dated April 30, 2008 related to the financial statements which appear in
Energas Resources, Inc. Form 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 2008.



/s/ Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP

Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
May 8, 2008
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intelimax Media Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Intelimax Media Inc. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 16, 2010 |                                 |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                   |                                 |
|                   | /s/ Charles Green                    |
|                   | Charles Green                        |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                   | (Principal Executive Officer)        |
|                   | Intelimax Media Inc.                 |
|                   |                                 |