alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### General Services Administration

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [OMB Control No. 9000-0167; Docket 2010-0083; Sequence 19]

# AGENCIES:

 Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The notice, OMB Control No. 9000-0167, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act—One-time Reporting Requirements for First-tier Subcontractors published in the                         **Federal Register**                         is being withdrawn and no longer is accepting comments.                    

# DATES:

April 30, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Ernest Woodson, Procurement Analyst, Contract Policy Branch, at telephone (202) 501-3775 or via e-mail to                         *ernest.woodson@gsa.gov.*                         Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-0167, withdrawal.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## A. Background

                    The Notice, published in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 75 FR 17918, April 8, 2010, requesting comments regarding an extension to an existing OMB clearance (9000-0167) is being withdrawn. The notice is being withdrawn because it is associated with a second interim rule which is still in process, and has not been published. Comments are no longer being sought.                

Dated: April 26, 2010.

Al Matera,

Director, Acquisition Policy Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-10067 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Diligent Board Member Services, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Alessandro Sodi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: May
17, 2010





/s/ Alessandro SodiAlessandro
      SodiChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-099-CV

CLEBURNE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, INC.	APPELLANT	

	V.

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, L.P. 				   APPELLEE

D/B/A AT&T TEXAS 		

	----------

	FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant's Motion For Voluntary Dismissal Of Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.  

DELIVERED:  May 28, 2009
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Ronald C. Martin, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Oak Valley Bancorp on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OakValley Bancorp.

 
| Date:  November 12, 2010 | By:    | /s/    RONALD C. MARTIN |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                          | Name:  | **Ronald C. Martin**                        |
|                          | Title: | **Chief Executive Officer**                 |

 

I,Richard A. McCarty, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Oak Valley Bancorp on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OakValley Bancorp.

 
| Date:  November 12, 2010 | By:    | /s/    RICHARD A. MCCARTY |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                          | Name:  | **Richard A. McCarty**                        |
|                          | Title: | **Chief Financial Officer**                   |

 

----
Draft Agenda 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Tuesday - October 28, 2003 

8:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. 

9:00 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. 

9:15 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. 

9:45 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. 

10:30 a.m. - 10:45 a.m. 

10:45 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. 

11:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. 

12:15 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. 

1:30 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. 

2:00 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. 

2:30 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. 

4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. 

5:00 p.m. 

Adams Mark St. Louis 

315 Chestnut Street (at 4th Street) 

St. Louis, Missouri 63102 

(314) 241-7400 

October 28-29, 2003 

Registration and Welcome 

Review and Approval of 

Draft Minutes 

Claimant Communication 

Program Status Report 

Break 

Status Report - Department of 

Labor 

Status Report - Department of 

Energy 

Lunch 

Dose Reconstruction Workgroup 

Working Group on Options for 

Evaluating Interviews 

Board Discussion -

 Claims Review Process 

Public Comment Period 

Adjourn 

Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

 Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

Ms. Chris Ellison 

Mr. David Sundin 

Mr. Peter Turcic, DOL 

Mr. Tom Rollow, DOE 

Mr. Mark Griffon 

 Workgroup Chair 

Dr. Jim Melius 

Workgroup Chair 

***Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.*** 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Draft Agenda 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Adams Mark St. Louis 

315 Chestnut Street (at 4th Street) 

St. Louis, Missouri 

(314) 241-7400 

October 28-29, 2003 

Wednesday - October 29, 2003 

8:00 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. 

8:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. 

9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. 

10:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. 

10:30 a.m. - 10:45 a.m. 

10:45 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. 

11:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. 

12:00 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. 

1:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. 

4:30 p.m. 

Registration and Welcome 

Administrative Housekeeping 

Site Profile Updates 

Research Issues Workgroup 

Break 

Research Issues 

Public Comment Period 

Lunch 

Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

 Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

Ms. Cori Homer, NIOSH 

 Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

 Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

Dr. Jim Neton, NIOSH 

Dr. Jim Melius 

 Workgroup Chair 

Mr. Russ Henshaw, NIOSH 

Closed Session for development, review and discussion of 

 the proposed Independent Government Cost Estimates (IGCE) 

for contracts 

Adjourn 

***Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.***
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2257

STEPHEN F. BUZZELL; KIMBERLY B. BUZZELL,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; ROB RICARDO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior 

District Judge. (3:09-cv-00161-RLW)

Submitted: August 25, 2010 Decided: September 16, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen F. Buzzell, Kimberly B. Buzzell, Appellants Pro Se. 

Anne E. Blaess, Melissa Briggs, Robert William Metzler, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Robert P.

McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen F. and Kimberly B. Buzzell appeal from the 

district court’s order dismissing their action against the 

Internal Revenue Service in which they sought a declaration that 

their rights were violated and sought to enjoin collection 

activities and the sale of their real property. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Buzzell v. Internal Revenue Serv., No. 3:09-cv-00161-RLW (E.D. 

Va. Sept. 2, 2009). We deny the Buzzells’ “Motion for Relief in 

the alternative Motion for Summary Judgment.” We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit32

 

 

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Sino-American Investment Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1.The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

 

                           Date:November 26,  2016                                           /s/ Zhong Fang

                                                                                     -------------------------------

                                                                                         ZhongFang, CEO & CFO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Department of Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of June 7, 2010, Meeting for Acadia National Park Advisory Commission.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets the date of June 7, 2010, meeting of the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission.

# DATES:

The public meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on Monday, June 7, 2010, at 1 p.m. (EASTERN).

*Location:*                         The meeting will be held at Park Headquarters, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609.                    

## Agenda

The June 7, 2010, Commission meeting will consist of the following:

1. Committee reports:

—Land Conservation.

—Park Use.

—Science and Education.

—Historic.

2. Old Business.

3. Superintendent's Report.

4. Chairman's Report.

5. Public Comments.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from the Superintendent, Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, telephone (207) 288-3338.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make oral/written                           ( print page 22623)                        presentations to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least seven days prior to the meeting. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.                

Dated: April 12, 2010.

Sheridan Steele,

Superintendent, Acadia National Park.

[FR Doc. 2010-10026 Filed 4-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-2N-P
Tuesday – April 20, 2004 

9:00 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. 

9:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. 

10:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. 

10:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. 

11:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. 

11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. 

1:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. 

2:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m. 

2:15 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. 

3:45 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. 

7:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m. 

7:15 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. 

8:30 p.m.

Draft Agenda
 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Red Lion Hotel Richland 

802 George Washington Way
 

Richland, Washington 99352 

Phone: (509) 946-7611 

Fax: (509) 943-8564 

April 20-21, 2004 

Registration and Welcome 

Review and Approval of 

 Draft Minutes, Meeting 21 

Program Status Report 

Status and Outreach -

Department of Labor 

Status Report – DOE 

Lunch 

Research Issues Status 

Break 

Report on Access to 

 Information for Performance 

 of Dose Reconstructions 

Dinner Break 

Introduction 

Public Comment 

Adjourn 

Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

 Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

Dr. Jim Neton, NIOSH 

Mr. Pete Turcic, DOL 

Mr. Tom Rollow, DOE 

Mr. Russ Henshaw, NIOSH 

Mr. Ted Katz, NIOSH 

Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

***Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate*** 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wednesday – April 21, 2004 

8:00 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. 

8:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. 

9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. 

10:00 a.m. -10:15 a.m. 

10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. 

11:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. 

11:30 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. 

1:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. 

2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. 

3:00 p.m. – 3:10 p.m. 

3:10 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. 

4:30 p.m.

Draft Agenda
 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Red Lion Hotel Richland 

802 George Washington Way
 

Richland, Washington 99352 

Phone: (509) 946-7611 

Fax: (509) 943-8564 

April 20-21, 2004 

Registration and Welcome Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

Administrative Housekeeping Ms. Cori Homer, NIOSH 

 Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

 Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

Contractor Update Dr. John Mauro, SC&A 

 Sanford, Cohen, & Mr. Joseph Fitzgerald, SC&A 

Associates 

Break 

Update on AWE Facilities Dr. Jim Neton, NIOSH 

Public Comment Period 

Lunch 

Site Profile Status, Use in Dr. Jim Neton, NIOSH 

 Dose Reconstructions, 

 and Roll-Out 

Board Discussion/Working Session on 

 Procedure Review and Selection of Cases 

Break 

Board Discussion/Working Session on 

 Procedure Review and Selection of Cases 

Adjourn 

***Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate*** 
3
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the filing of SureQuest Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”)Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,C.Scott Sykes, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto the 18 U.S.C. (SS) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (SS) 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ C. Scott  Sykes, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| C. Scott  Sykes, Jr.     |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |
| March 31,  2003          |

 

----
My response to the NIOSH dose reconstruction paper about the IAAP/BAECP and what it
means to people who worked there and who now have radiation caused diseases.

At the first reading of the NIOSH response, it appears that the writers have put a lot of time
and effort into the document. Thank you for that effort. 1 wish that more records of the
plant’s history were made and that they could be found for study.

1 see that all of the findings shown in the NIOSH report are based upon known and publicly
announced problems. The report mentions the Depleted Uranium from several hundred open-
air blasts at the Test Fire sites. It also reports some information from the Landauer Film
badges worn by X-Ray technicians (plant wide) and selected persons in the AEC plant starting
in about 1962. Some Landauer information came from the few film badges used as area dose
recorders for that period. The 200* Physical Security people and the command officers like
myself were not issued any film badges but were around the weapons and materials all the
many off shift hours that the workers were absent (nights and weekends).

My comments about film badge follows.

A person working around radioactive sources or materials wears a film badge. The film badge
records the dose received by the badge and its wearer. Ideally the higher the risk, the more
frequently that badge is checked. Risk is determined by historical data or in our case, found
data in the hard way. While the exact details are not brought out in our case, it appears that
the plant did not use film badges until about 1962. Our plant did not increase the number of
badges or frequency of change until later in that decade. Therefore, no one can say if we
were radiated or not base on evidence of film badges.

The problem with data retrieved years later from film badges hung in building areas is that if
a larger radioactive event happened instantaneously while people were in the area, the film
badge will record that event with all the data for that month. Years later, the data reviewed
would show that the employee would appear to have only received a small dose that month
where in fact the employee was severely damaged.

Each employee entering these areas should have been wearing film dose rate badges. The
frequency of change should have determined by the readings over several years or by
documented lack of readings and not empirically decided that they were not needed. This
seems to me either a severe business omission or a criminal act.

In closing, I consider that the dose reconstruction report for the Burlington Atomic Energy
Plant is flawed as it is based upon a few skimpy records that were found and forced upon the
government. No evidence that radiation was not there have been found or reported.

Plainly put: We were expendable and it is not right. |
|

06-21-04 PO1:11 IN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted the financial
statements included in Emerging Growth Acquisition Corporation I's Form 10-KSB 
for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-01-1997
<CASH>                                         156,400 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,900 
<PP&E>                                               0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,300 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,500 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                           300 
<OTHER-SE>                                           0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,300 
<SALES>                                              0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0 
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (5,900)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
        

</TABLE>