alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6077 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6077

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     Recognizing the National Comedy Center in Jamestown, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Comedy Center Recognition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER IN JAMESTOWN, NEW YORK.

    (a) Congressional Recognition.--Congress--
            (1) recognizes that the National Comedy Center, located in 
        Jamestown, New York, is the only museum of its kind that exists 
        for the exclusive purpose of celebrating comedy in all its 
        forms; and
            (2) officially designates the National Comedy Center as the 
        National Comedy Center.
    (b) Effect of Recognition.--The National Comedy Center recognized 
in this section is not a unit of the National Park System, and the 
designation shall not be construed to require or permit Federal funds 
to be expended for any purpose related to the Center.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6077

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     Recognizing the National Comedy Center in Jamestown, New York.
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
      States Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
      (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,
      Clayton Van Levy, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mining Oil, Inc.,
      a
      Texas corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
      that:




(1)
            the
                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
                ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                of 1934; and




(2)
            information
                contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated: November 17,
                2008
            /s/
                Clayton Van LevyClayton
                Van LevyPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being
      filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Mining Oil, Inc. and will be retained by Mining Oil, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996             DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                             666                   5,131
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,844                  13,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (178)                   (465)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,378                  18,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,257                  39,354
<PP&E>                                          34,920                  51,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,863)                (21,054)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,129                  96,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,917                   8,166
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            60                     140
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,994                  60,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,129                  96,562
<SALES>                                         96,047                 162,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,047                 162,848
<CGS>                                           79,990                 136,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,638                 149,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    41                     127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,210                   1,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,158                  12,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,482                   4,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,676                   7,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,676                   7,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94                     .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94                     .58


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6412

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRIAN T. REYNOLDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-6464

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRIAN T. REYNOLDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CR-96-109-A, CA-97-1661-AM)
2

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian T. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998),

and denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's orders and opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Reynolds, Nos. CR-96-109-A; CA-97-

1661-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 1997; Mar. 11, 1998). We grant Appellant's motion to adopt the attachments from the docketing statement

in No. 98-6412 for consideration in case No. 98-6464. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DURWOOD, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,104
<OTHER-SE>                                       (584)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       520
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                (23,534)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
|   |  ̈ | the Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  ̈ | all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 10, 2011 | /s/ Shili Liu                                |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|               | Shili Liu                                    |
|               | Chief Executive Officer                      |
|               | (Principal Executive Officer)                |
|               |                                         |
| Date: May 10, 2011 | /s/ Kenny Chow                               |
|               | Kenny Chow                                   |
|               | Chief Financial Officer                      |
|               | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT 31.1  I, Richard Krutosik, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noble Medical Products, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers second fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: June 17, 2008 /s/ Richard Krutosik Richard Krutosik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
NIOSH 10‐Year Program Revi

Implementation

Stuart Hinnefeld

Director

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Healt

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

December 2011

Tampa, FL
Five Review Reports

 Reports focus on the following topic areas:

• Dose Reconstruction

• Quality of Service

• Timeliness of Program Products

• SEC Petitions

• Quality of Science

 Summary of the reports and recommendatio

available on the NIOSH Web site at:

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/review/docket194/default.html)
Quality of Service

 Issues related to customer‐supplied informa

• Develop system(s) for collecting all customer com

along with disposition action

 Issues related to understandability of inform

• Improve understandability and quality of comm

vehicles: Web site, information sheets, letters t

claimants or petitioners, etc.

 Issues related to access to information

• Ensure Board and Work Group work products ar

on the Web site as soon as practical
Timeliness

 Give higher priority to claims returned by D

new dose reconstruction

 Continue to adopt aggressive timeliness obj

for dose reconstruction

 Adopt aggressive time limits for the comple

the review of SEC petitions
SEC Petitions

 Separate “policy” issues from “science” issu

• Include more detail on the evolution of a scienc

in SEC Evaluation Reports (e.g., thorium exposu

• Develop a policy memo with each Evaluation Re

identifies policy decision and the thought proce

the decisions

 Work to define “sufficient accuracy”

 Utilize staff “other than health physicists” w

appropriate to guard against “professional

orientation” toward accepting adequacy oftechniques
Quality of Science

 Consider subjecting program documents to 

peer review

• NIOSH is developing an implementation guide t

levels of review of program documents

 Assess validity of indirect exposure method

• NIOSH is conducting trial‐run validation using S

River Site data
Quality of Science—cont.

 Characterize degree of claimant‐favorability in 

methods

• Compare “claimant‐favorable” approaches to assess

methods commonly used in other applications

 Evaluate utility of EPA surrogate data protocol

 NIOSH review of EPA protocol indicates its

recommendations are similar to information in 

Use of Data from Other Facilities in the Comple

Dose Reconstructions Under EEOICPA” (DCAS‐I

• Non‐NIOSH reviewers will review EPA protocol again

methods used by NIOSH
Dose Reconstruction

 Work with Subcommittee on Dose Reconstructio

Reviews on QA/QC evaluation

• Develop duplicate analysis program in order to identif

issues with dose reconstruction process

• Review recent dose reconstruction review findings to 

cause of findings

 Prioritize elimination of overestimating dose

reconstructions relative to implementation of otprogram review actions

• Analyze cost of eliminating overestimating dose recon• Consider impact on long‐range budget planning
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_______________________________________

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Criminal No. 00-0105 (PLF)

) Civil Action No. 05-0555

)

BYRON MCDADE, 

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court following an evidentiary hearing on defendant

Byron McDade’s amended motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence

[334] is DENIED and Civil Action No. 05-0555 is DISMISSED. This is a final appealable

Order. See Rule 4(a), Fed. R. App. P.; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of the

Opinion to the Director of the Bureau of Prisons; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of the

Opinion to the Office of the Pardon Attorney at the Department of Justice.

SO ORDERED.

/s/____________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: August 5, 2009 United States District Judge
Summary – OCAS-TIB-007, Rev. 0 1 SC&A – January 20, 2011

Overview of

NEUTRON EXPOSURES AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE

(OCAS-TIB-007, Rev. 0) 

Workers at some Department of Energy (DOE) and Atomic Weapons Employer facilities have 

the potential to receive radiation exposures from neutron sources. The Technical Information 

Bulletin (TIB), Neutron Exposures at the Savannah River Site (OCAS-TIB-007), provides 

guidance to determine neutron exposures for workers at the Savannah River Site (SRS). 

Due to changes in radiation monitoring practices over time at the SRS, employees who worked 

there prior to 1971 might not have been adequately monitored for neutron exposure. As a result, 

neutron monitoring records prior to 1971 may under-report actual neutron dose. 

Starting with the use of an improved radiation dosimeter in 1971, workers with significant 

potential for neutron exposure were adequately monitored. However, some workers, depending 

on their job classification, might have been intermittently exposed to low-level neutron radiation 

and not monitored, since their exposures were not thought to exceed the DOE criterion for 

mandatory neutron monitoring in place in the 1970s through the late 1980s. Starting around 

1989, SRS began using a lower DOE criterion of potential neutron dose as the basis for who was 

monitored for neutron exposure. 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RESULTING FROM THE TECHNICAL REVIEW

The technical contractor for the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) 

reviewed the TIB and produced the two findings summarized below: 

Finding #1: Guidance does not specify all occupations that may involve neutron exposure at 

SRS. 

Finding #2: Guidance regarding conditions where the work area is unknown is subjective and 

contradictory. 

RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS

In response to the findings identified above, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and 

Health (NIOSH) revised the procedure to accommodate the findings. Revision 1 of the TIB was 

issued on October 15, 2007. 

 

All issues were resolved to the satisfaction of the Board.
EXHIBIT 99.9










LETTER OF CONSENT




Re:ARC Resources Ltd. – Annual Report on Form 40-F




We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and our report dated February 18, 2014 evaluating ARC Resources Ltd.'s petroleum and natural gas reserves and resources as at December 31, 2013, as described in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of ARC Resources Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and the inclusions of information derived from our report.







Yours truly,GLJ PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.“ Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.”Bryan M. Joa, P. Eng.Vice President





Dated:  March 20, 2014


Calgary, Alberta


CANADA
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Signatures                         |   | Title                                                                |   | Date             |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                               |   |                                                                 |   |             |
| /s/ Natalie RussellNatalie Russell |   | Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting OfficerSecretaryDirector |   | January 11, 2011 |

----