alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  I, John S. Chidester, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town and Country Appraisal Service, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: November 6, 2008  /s/ John S. Chidester John S. Chidester Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   2
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 113

Teleconference Meeting

October 4, 2016

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537

Participant Code: 9933701

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Start

• Roll-call – Mr. Katz, DFO

• Welcome – Dr. Melius, Chair

• August Board Meeting Final Vote Tallies – Mr. Katz, DFO

• Bliss and Laughlin Steel (Buffalo, NY) SEC Petition – Dr. Neton, DCAS

• Dose Reconstruction Review Report to HHS – Dr. Melius, Chair

• Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition Status Update – Mr. Rutherford, DCAS

• Updates from Work Groups and Subcommittees (as necessary) – WG/SC Chairs

• Plans for the November 2016 Board Meeting – All Members

Adjourn
Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement

for

Members of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (Board) is very concerned with 

maintaining the transparency of the compensation program created by the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA). In an 

effort to foster a fully open and honest environment for claimants and in order to allay 

any concerns within the stakeholder community regarding perceived or actual conflicts of 

interest for Board members, the Board releases the following information for its 

Members: 

Board Member’s Name: Henry A. Anderson, M.D. 

Job Title and Current Employer: Chief Medical Officer

 Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services 

 Madison, Wisconsin 

Biographical Information: Dr. Henry Anderson received his MD degree from the 

University of Wisconsin Medical School in 1972. He was certified in 1977 by the 

American Board of Preventive Medicine with a sub-specialty in occupational and 

environmental medicine and in 1983 became a fellow of the American College of 

Epidemiology. In 1980 he joined the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social 

Services as the Wisconsin State Environmental and Occupational Disease 

Epidemiologist. In 1991 he also assumed the duties of Chief Medical Officer. In July 

2008 he was appointed Interim Wisconsin State Health Officer and served in that 

capacity until January 2009 at which time he returned to his Chief Medical Officer and 

State Epidemiologist duties. Since 1980 he has held adjunct Professorships at the 

University of Wisconsin - Madison, Department of Population Health Sciences and the 

UW Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, Center for Human Studies. He has 

published over 230 scientific articles on a broad spectrum of environmental, occupational 

and public health topics. He is the past chair of the National Institute of Occupational 

Safety and Health Board of Scientific Councilors.

Expert Witness Experience: N/A

DOE/AWE Sites Where a Conflict of Interest Exists: N/A

Subject Matters Where a Conflict of Interest Exists: N/A

Conflicted Sites/Subject Matters Regarding Which the Board Member Has 

Received Permission to Participate: N/A
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form
10-Q of Resource Group Inc. for the Quarter Ended August 31, 2008, I, Ken
Greenlaw, Chief Financial Officer of Resource Group, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended
      August 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q for the Period Ended August 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Resource Group, Inc.

|By:    | /s/ Ken Greenlaw       
|------ | -----------------------
|       | Ken Greenlaw           
|       | Chief Financial Officer
|       |                        
|       |                        
|Dated: | December 31, 2008      

---
NIOSH Program Update

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, CHP

Director, DCAS

National Institute for Occupational Safety and He

July 2015

Idaho Falls, Idaho

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Worker Outreach

June

 1‐day Dose Reconstruction and SEC

Workshop in Idaho Falls

 JOTG Outreach Meeting in St. Louis

July

 Outreach Town Hall meeting in Idaho 

just prior to Board meeting

 JOTG Outreach Meeting in Amarillo

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Worker Outreach

 September – 2‐day DR and SEC Workshop i

Cincinnati

 October – Joint Outreach Task Group and

Department of Labor (DOL) ombudsman w

in West Valley, NY and Ashtabula, OH

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Program News

 September plain language training

 NIOSH Director’s June meeting with Congre

Jolly (FL)

 DCAS personnel moves

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Claim Information

(as of July 20, 2015)

Referred to NIOSH for dose

reconstruction (DR) 43,578

Cases at NIOSH for DR 1,365

41,481

 36,714 cases submit

DR report Cases returned to

 1,396 cases currentl

Department of Labor (DOL) from DR by DOL

 3,371 cases pulled f

Exposure Cohort (SE

Cases administratively 732 closed

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Active Cases as of July 20, 20

 Of the 1,365 cases remain at NIOSH for DR

 348 cases in DR process

 239 initial draft DR reports with claima

(NIOSH is awaiting the return of the OC

form)

 778 cases in DR development

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Probability of Causation (PoC

Summary for Completed DR

 Of the 36,714 DRs sent back to DOL f

final adjudication

• 10,336 cases had a PoC ≥ 50%• 26,378 cases had a PoC < 50%

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Summary of first 5,000 DRs fini

 4,889 claims at DOL

• 264 pulled for DOL issues• 392 pulled for SEC• 4,233 submitted with DR

 92 claims at NIOSH

• 82 administratively closed• 2 DRs with claimants (0 initial; 2 DOL returns)

• 8 DRs in process (0 initial; 8 DOL returns)

19 claim numbers deleted

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Summary of first 10,000 DRs fin

 9,808 claims at DOL

• 439 pulled for DOL issues• 1,026 pulled for SEC

• 8,343 submitted with DR

 162 claims at NIOSH

• 146 administratively closed• 4 DRs with claimants (0 initial; 4 DOL returns)

• 12 DRs in process (0 initial; 12 DOL returns)

30 claim numbers deleted

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Request for Exposure Records f

Department of Energy

(As of July 15, 2015) 

 Outstanding 2 Requests more than 60 days 

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Submittals and Production

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
Questions?

Division of Compensation Analysis and S
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 11681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-943]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


NeighborWorks[supreg] America; Regular Board of Directors 
Meeting; Sunshine Act

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Tuesday, March 4, 2008.

Place: 1325 G Street NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

Status: Open.

Contact Person for More Information:  Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate 
Secretary, (202) 220-2376; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25404d444949654b520b4a5742"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6c3cec7cacae6c8d188c9d4c1">[email protected]</span></a>.

Agenda: 
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of the Minutes
III. Summary Report of the Audit Committee
IV. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee
V. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee
VI. Financial Report
VII. Chief Executive Officer's Quarterly Management Report
VIII. Connecticut Housing Finance Agency Nondiscrimination Resolution
IX. Field Operations Presentation
X. Adjournment

Erica Hall,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08-943 Filed 2-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7570


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  By:    |  /s/ Zhijian (James) Zhang                |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Zhijian (James) Zhang                    |
|  Title: |  Principal Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  May 13, 2011                             |

|  By:    |  /s/ Mandy Chung                          |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Mandy Chung                              |
|  Title: |  Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  May 13, 2011                             |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                        9
<CIK>                                                   0001029407
<NAME>                           "Harbor Florida Bancshares, Inc."
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000
<CURRENCY>                       US $

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                     29085
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       729
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                85767
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    165259
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      162053
<LOANS>                                  1251669
<ALLOWANCE>                                12729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1582695
<DEPOSITS>                               1098537
<SHORT-TERM>                               18000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        26683
<LONG-TERM>                               220091
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                    3114
<OTHER-SE>                                216270
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1582695
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            25453
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           4184
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              17
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           29654
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         11700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         15125
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      14529
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             7341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             9359
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  9359
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                5727
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              3.88
<LOANS-NON>                                 2766
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             276
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             1814
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           12544
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 97
<RECOVERIES>                                  72
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          12729
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       12729
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5823 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5823

     To prohibit Federal agencies from mandating the deployment of 
             vulnerabilities in data security technologies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2018

Ms. Lofgren (for herself, Mr. Massie, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. 
 Ted Lieu of California, and Mr. Gaetz) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 
 and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit Federal agencies from mandating the deployment of 
             vulnerabilities in data security technologies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Data Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DATA SECURITY VULNERABILITY MANDATES.

    (a) Agency Actions.--Except as provided in subsection (c), no 
agency may mandate or request that a manufacturer, developer, or seller 
of covered products design or alter the security functions in its 
product or service to allow the surveillance of any user of such 
product or service, or to allow the physical search of such product, by 
any agency.
    (b) Court Orders.--Except as provided in subsection (c), no court 
may issue an order to compel a manufacturer, developer, or seller of 
covered products to design or alter the security functions in its 
product or service to allow the surveillance of any user of such 
product or service, or to allow the physical search of such product, by 
an agency.
    (c) Exception.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to 
mandates, requests, or court orders authorized under the Communications 
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (47 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
    (d) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``agency'' has the meaning given the term in 
        section 3502 of title 44, United States Code; and
            (2) the term ``covered product'' means any computer 
        hardware, computer software, or electronic device that is made 
        available to the general public.
                                 <all>
```
#### Johnny WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEKALB COUNTY, A Political Subdivision of the State of Georgia, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 76-2998.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 10, 1978.

Edward Lundy Baety, Atlanta, Ga., Fletcher Farrington, Savannah, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

George P. Dillard, Herbert 0. Edwards, Wendell K. Willard, Decatur, Ga., J. Lewis Sapp, Charles K. Howard, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Before TUTTLE and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and ED ENFIELD,* District Judge.

*

 U.S. District Judge of the Northern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

' PER CURIAM:

Upon motion for rehearing, a majority of the court agrees with Judge Clark’s special concurring opinion. The opinion is accordingly modified to hold that under the teaching of *Washington v. Davis,*426 U.S. 229, 96 S.Ct. 2040, 48 L.Ed.2d 597 (1976), the named plaintiff and the class must make a showing of purposeful discrimination before casting the burden on the defendant to rebut the charge; that a claim under § 1981 is, for this purpose, to be equated with a *3claim under the Fourteenth Amendment, dealt with by the court in *Washington,*rather than under Title VII of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act.

That part of the panel opinion headed “Conclusion” [577 F.2d at 256] is therefore deleted from the opinion as are the statements holding that a prima facie case is made by statistics alone. The following “Conclusion” is substituted for the corresponding part of the original opinion:

CONCLUSION

The trial court decided the case before *Washington v. Davis, supra,*and thus did not find it necessary to determine whether there was purposeful discrimination. The case must be remanded to the trial court to determine whether the plaintiff’s evidence — including the statistical data — established a prima facie case of discriminatory purpose which, if unrebutted, would establish liability. If the court finds that such a prima facie case has been made out, we adhere to our other determinations contained in the original opinion1 and the trial court will then resolve the questions we have set forth there.

The judgment is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Judge Tuttle would adhere to the original opinion of the panel.

No member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

1

. None of the determinations in that opinion have been challenged by the petition for rehearing except that dealing with the standard of proof under § 1981.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6049 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6049

 To remove the limitation on large accelerated filers qualifying as an 
            emerging growth company, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2018

   Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remove the limitation on large accelerated filers qualifying as an 
            emerging growth company, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Business Startup Clarification 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY CRITERIA.

    (a) Securities Act of 1933.--Section 2(a)(19)(D) of the Securities 
Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(19)(D)) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(D) the date on which the public float of such 
                issuer surpasses an amount established by the 
                Commission, but which amount may not be less than the 
                value of public float required to qualify as a large 
                accelerated filer under section 240.12b-2 of title 17, 
                Code of Federal Regulations.''.
    (b) Securities Exchange Act of 1934.--Subparagraph (D) of the first 
paragraph (80) of section 3(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(15 U.S.C. 78c(a)) (relating to emerging growth companies) is amended 
to read as follows:
                    ``(D) the date on which the public float of such 
                issuer surpasses an amount established by the 
                Commission, but which amount may not be less than the 
                value of public float required to qualify as a large 
                accelerated filer under section 240.12b-2 of title 17, 
                Code of Federal Regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```