DOSE RECONSTRUCTION CASES 101 THROUGH 334 SUMMARY FIGU

Figure 1. Breakdown of Cases 101 through 334 by Employment Site 

Bridgeport Brass-Havens 

Brookhaven National Laboratory 

De Soto Avenue Facility 

Feed Materials Production Center 

General Steel Industries 

Hanford 

Idaho National Laboratory 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 

Los Alamos National Laboratory 

Mound Plant 

Nevada Test Site 

Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant (K-25) 

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10) 

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant 

Pinellas Plant 

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant 

Rocky Flats Plant 

Savannah River Site 

Simonds Saw and Steel Co. 

Sites With 1 Case 

Sites with 2 Cases 

Y-12 Plant 21 

26 

3 

11 

5 

4 

11 

5 

16 

15 

7 

9 

10 

5 

11 

25 

4 

9 

3 3 

4 

Cases R

Cases with multiple emare counted in Figure 1 employment site. Theof all bars is greater thof cases reviewed. 

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 

1 
Figure 2. Comparison of Claims Reviewed to Goal of 1% Total Claims
 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 

2 

Area IV of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory 

Argonne National Laboratory - East 

Bethlehem Steel 

Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC) 

General Steel Industries 

Hanford 

Idaho National Laboratory 

Iowa Ordnance Plant 

Kansas City Plant 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 

Los Alamos National Laboratory 

Mallinckrodt Chemical Co., Destrehan St. 

Mound Plant 

Nevada Test Site 

Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant (K-25) 

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10) 

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant 

Pantex Plant 

Pinellas Plant 

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant 

Rocky Flats Plant 

Sandia National Laboratory 

Savannah River Site 

Weldon Spring Plant 

Y-12 Plant 

Remaining 1% 16 

8 

0 

18 

0 

6 

1 1 

2 2 2 

4 4 4 

1 

0 

2 

3 

0 

1 

3 

12 

0 

9 

4 

1 

0 

66 

21 

2 

37 

1 

11 

5 

4 

1 

11 

5 

16 

15 

7 

9 

1 

10 

5 

1 

0 

11 

25 

4 

9 

1 

2 

1 

53 

43 

3 

38 

3 

16 

13 

4 4 

19 

5 

24 

26 

19 

6 

4 

11 

8 

3 

7 

14 

38 

3 

11 

9 

3 3 

Cases 1-100 Cases 101- 33Goal: 1% of To

Cases with multiple emare counted in Figure 2 employment site. Therof all bars is greater thaof cases reviewed. The selection goal claim were provided by NIOSused by the DRSC to se305-334. 

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 
Figure 3. Breakdown of Case Reviews 101 through 334 by POC
 

NIOSH Case Statistics
 

for Population of all
 

Cases
 

POC Percent 

Range of Cases 

< 20% 44.00% 

20% - 39.9% 20.51% 40% - 44.9% 6.13% 45% - 49.9% 0.99% 

>50% 28.37% 

POC ≥ 50 

21% 

45 ≤ POC <50 

40≤ POC< 44.9 30% 

22% 

20 ≤ POC <40 

20% 

POC < 20 

7% 

3
Figure 4. Breakdown of Case Reviews 101-334 by Years of Employment 

(Represents 28 of 33 Risk Models) 

NIOSH Case Statistics
 

for Population of all
 

Cases
 

Years of Percent 

Employment of Cases 

< 1 8.46 1-5 16.83 

5-10 10.92 

10 - 20 17.87 20 - 30 19.51 30 - 40 21.2 

>40 5.2 

≤1 

4% 

1-5 

7% 

5-10 

9% 

10-20 

20-30 13% 

29% 

30-40 

32% 

≥40 

6% 

4
Figure 5. Breakdown of Cases 101 through 334 by Risk Model
 

5

Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia 

Acute Myeloid Leukemia 

All Digestive 

All Male Genitalia 

Bladder 

Bone 

Brain/Nervous System 

Breast 

Colon 

Esophagus 

Female Genitalia 

Gallbladder 

Leukemia, excluding CLL 

Liver 

Lung 

mphoma and Multiple Myeloma 

Malignant Melanoma 

-melanoma Skin (BCC and SCC) 

Oral Cavity and Pharynx 

Other and Ill Defined 

Other Respiratory 

Pancreas 

Rectum 

Skin 

Stomach 

Thyroid 

Urinary, excluding bladder 18 

4 

6 6 

2 

8 

7 

1 

8 

7 

10 

45 

2 

6 

2 

1 

2 

15 

10 

5 

8 

18 

47 

2 

7 

2 

Claims Ev

Missing Risk Models 

• CLL • Connective Tis• Ovary • Eye • Other Endocrin

0 10 20 30 40 50 

Ly

Non
Figure 6. Breakdown of Cases Reviews 101 through 334 by Decade First Empl

NIOSH Case Statistics for
 

Population of all Cases
 

First 

Employment 

Period 

Percent of 

Cases 

1910s <0.1% 1920s 0.2% 1930s 1.2% 

1940s 14.7% 1950s 33.9% 1960s 17.6% 1970s 15.6% 1980s 11.5% 1990s 4.1% 2000s 1.0% 

2010s 0.1% 

1930s 

2% 

1940s 

21% 

1950s 

49% 

1960s 

18% 

1970s 

6% 

1980s 

4% 

6