Page 1 of 16

DOE Review Release 03/23/2016 

Guidance on Assigning Occupational X-Ray 

Dose Under EEOICPA for X-Rays 

Administered Off Site

ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Rev. 01

Effective Date: 03/18/2016 

Supersedes: Revision 00

Subject Expert(s): Elyse M. Thomas

Document Owner 

Approval: Signature on File

Elyse M. Thomas, Document Owner

Approval Date: 03/16/2016

Concurrence: Signature on File

John M. Byrne, Objective 1 Manager

Concurrence Date: 03/15/2016

Concurrence: Signature on File

Edward F. Maher, Objective 3 Manager

Concurrence Date: 03/17/2016

Concurrence: Vickie S. Short Signature on File for

Kate Kimpan, Project Director

Concurrence Date: 03/15/2016

Approval: Signature on File

James W. Neton, Associate Director for Science

Approval Date: 03/18/2016

FOR DOCUMENTS MARKED AS A TOTAL REWRITE, REVISION, OR PAGE CHANGE, REPLACE THE PRIOR 

REVISION AND DISCARD / DESTROY ALL COPIES OF THE PRIOR REVISION.

New Total Rewrite Revision Page Change
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 2 of 16

PUBLICATION RECORD

EFFECTIVE 

DATE

REVISION

NUMBER DESCRIPTION

01/03/2011 00 New technical information bulletin to implement new DCAS guidance 

based on recent NIOSH interpretation of EEOICPA statute language. 

Incorporates formal internal and NIOSH review comments. Training 

required: As determined by the Objective Manager. Initiated by 

Elyse M. Thomas.

03/18/2016 01 Incorporates new information, references, and updated list of 

facilities that had X-rays performed off the site. Three sites moved 

from Table 1 (off-site) to Table 2 (on-site), resulting in the addition of 

X-ray dose (Hanford, Portsmouth, and Extrusion Plant (from 1996-

2006). Incorporates formal internal review comments. No review 

comments were received as a result of formal NIOSH review. 

Constitutes a total rewrite of the document. Training required: As 

determined by the Objective Manager. Initiated by Elyse M. Thomas.
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 3 of 16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE PAGE

Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 4

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 5

2.0 Guidance ................................................................................................................................. 5

3.0 Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 5

References ........................................................................................................................................ 12

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE TITLE PAGE

3-1 Sites with known occurrences of occupational X-rays administered at locations other 

than the covered facility ........................................................................................................... 6

3-2 Covered facilities that administered occupational X-rays on site, or for which no evidence 

exists that X-rays were taken off site........................................................................................ 8
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 4 of 16

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 

AEC U.S. Atomic Energy Commission

AWE Atomic Weapons Employers

CTW construction trade workers

DCAS Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

DOE U.S. Department of Energy

EEOICPA Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000

kVp peak kilovoltage

mA milliampere

NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NUMEC Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation

ORAU Oak Ridge Associated Universities

SEC Special Exposure Cohort

SRDB Ref ID Site Research Database Reference Identification (number)

TIB technical information bulletin

U.S.C. United States Code

§ section or sections
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 5 of 16

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Technical information bulletins (TIBs) are not official determinations made by the National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) but are rather general working documents that provide 

historical background information and guidance to assist in the preparation of dose reconstructions at 

particular sites or categories of sites. They will be revised in the event additional relevant information 

is obtained about the affected site(s). TIBs may be used to assist NIOSH staff in the completion of 

individual dose reconstructions.

In this document, the word “facility” is used as a general term for an area, building, or group of 

buildings that served a specific purpose at a site. It does not necessarily connote an “atomic weapons 

employer facility” or a “Department of Energy (DOE) facility” as defined in the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 [42 U.S.C. § 7384l(5) and (12)].

The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA) requires 

the assignment of external dose from medical X-ray examinations that were performed for 

occupational health screening and were required as a condition of employment. Many DOE and 

Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) sites had their own medical clinics and equipment to perform 

medical X-ray screening of their workers. At some sites, however, and sometimes dependent on the 

timeframe, the sites contracted with private physicians, clinics, or local community hospitals to provide 

this service to workers.

The NIOSH interpretation of the EEOICPA statute affects how X-ray dose should be assigned when 

the X-rays were taken at a site or location that is not defined under the statute as a covered facility. 

This includes the scenario in which X-rays were taken at offsite locations, such as private physicians’ 

offices, clinics, or local community hospitals. The NIOSH interpretation is that the statute defines 

covered radiation as the radiation received by a covered employee at a covered facility during a 

covered period (NIOSH 2010). Except in limited circumstances concerning residual radiation, only 

radiation that the employee received while at a covered facility can be included in dose reconstruction. 

Any site profile stating or suggesting that offsite medical screening doses should be included will be 

revised to be consistent with this NIOSH interpretation.

2.0 GUIDANCE

If it is known that occupational medical X-ray dose was received at a location other than a covered 

facility (i.e., an offsite physician’s office, clinic, or local community hospital), it shall not be included in 

dose reconstruction. If there is doubt about where the X-ray exposure was received, dose 

reconstructors should assume that the dose was received at a covered facility.

3.0 DISCUSSION

Whether X-ray exposure was received at a covered facility is often discovered in the research process 

during the review and analysis of historical documentation and claim file records from a particular 

covered site. This information is then included in the site profile and/or SEC Evaluation Report for 

that site. Table 3-1 is a list of sites for which historical information about X-rays administered to 

energy employees at offsite, non-covered facilities has been found. Table 3-1 lists those sites along 

with appropriate periods of applicability.

When historical documentation does not provide the needed information about where the 

occupational X-rays might have been taken, the energy employee claim file records might contain 

evidence that some X-rays were taken off site. For example, X-ray request forms might contain a 

private physician’s, clinic’s, or hospital’s letterhead. This is not always adequate evidence that the Xrays were taken offsite, because many sites contracted with private radiologists for radiological 
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 6 of 16

interpretation of the X-rays, even if the X-rays were obtained on the covered site, and the radiologist’s 

report might be on the office or clinic letterhead. Dose reconstructors should not include the dose 

from X-rays when it is clear from the claim file records that they were taken off-site at a non-covered 

facility. When it is not clear where the X-rays were taken, dose reconstructors should include the 

dose. Dose reconstructors should consult the Project Principal Medical Dosimetrist if questions arise. 

When neither historical documentation nor claim file records provide the needed information about 

where the occupational X-rays might have been taken, dose reconstructors should assume that any

occupational medical X-ray exposure occurred at the covered facility where the energy employee 

worked.

Table 3-1. Sites with known occurrences of occupational X-rays administered at locations other than 

the covered facility. 

Covered facility Noncovered (offsite) location

Applicable 

periods for X-rays 

at noncovered 

facilities Reference

Albany Research 

Center

Corvallis Clinic or private physicians’ offices in 

Albany, OR.

All Unknown 1986a, 1986b

Aliquippa Forge “The X-rays were taken by Dr. W. T. Rice of 

Rochester, Pa. ...but the X-ray films are retained in 

his office” (Tabershaw 1949a, p. 3).

All ORAUT 2015a, p. 23; 

Tabershaw 1949a

Allied Chemical “All new hires are given a pre-employment physical 

at the doctor’s office which includes a careful 

medical history, general health assessment by the 

physician and a chest X-ray...” (Freeman 1975, p. 

178).

All ORAUT 2014a, p. 20;

Freeman 1975

Ames Laboratory “The X-ray equipment for occupational medical 

examinations of Ames Laboratory staff members 

was located at the Iowa State Student Health 

Center/College Hospital...” (ORAUT 2012a, p. 24).

All ORAUT 2012a; Voss 1957

Baker Brothers “Dr. Norwood made arrangements for chest Xrays....at the Robin Wood Hospital in Toledo...”All Nickson 1943, p. 2

Battelle 

Columbus

“The Battelle claim records indicate that the chest 

fluoroscopy examinations were performed in a 

private physician’s office.” (ORAUT 2010a, p. 17).

All chest 

fluoroscopy

ORAUT 2010a, 2010b

Battelle 

Columbus

“X-rays and blood counts are done at the University 

Hospital which is only a short distance from the 

Institute.” 

“...x-rays were performed on site in Health Services 

from the late 1950s to the early 1980s for Battelle 

staff that required them. Prior to this time period, 

the x-rays were provided at a physician's office.”

1943–1956 Tabershaw 1949b, p. 3; 

Amstein 2008, p.4

Extrusion Plant “Laboratory work, i.e. urinalyses, blood tests, and 

X-rays, is done at the local hospital, Ashtabula 

General.” (Hibbits and Pryor 1970, p. 8). 

Based on information in the claim file records, it 

appears that X-rays were taken off site at Ashtabula 

General Hospital through 1980. 

It is assumed that X-rays were taken on site from 

1981 to 2006, when the site was decommissioned.

Before 1981 and 

after 2006

Hibbitts and Pryor 1970; 

Jelinek 1971; 

Johnson 1976 

Grand Junction Warren Bush “said the company doctor was Dr. 

Raso, who had an x-ray unit in his office in Grand 

Junction.”

1947–1961 and 

1970–2002

Stoller undated, p. 9

Kansas City 

Plant

“In 1997, medical X-ray services were 

outsourced;...” (ORAUT 2006a, p. 14).

After 1996 ORAUT 2006a; Todd 2004,

p. 3

Kellex/Pierpont “It is understood that the only examination that will 

not be performed by Kellex personnel is the chest 

radiograph.”

All Beckerley 1948, p. 3
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 7 of 16

Covered facility Noncovered (offsite) location

Applicable 

periods for X-rays 

at noncovered 

facilities Reference

Lawrence 

Berkeley 

National 

Laboratory

“In the early years before about 1964, workers had 

their physical exams (including X-rays) in their 

private physicians’ offices ...” (ORAUT 2010d, p. 

22). 

“Doses for 1991 to 1995 are for the Picker machine, 

and for 1996 to the present ... employees have 

been sent off-site for X-rays ...” (ORAUT 2010d, p. 

23).

Before 1964 and 

after 1995

ORAUT 2010d; 

Parker 1963; 

Grondona 2010

Linde Ceramics “Linde X-rays were performed off-site at a noncovered commercial facility.” (ORAUT 2015b, p. 69).All ORAUT 2015b; 

Author unknown 1948; 

Linde 1950; Holmes 1944; 

Van Horn 1943 

Mallinckrodt “The annual chest x-rays and presumably the pelvic 

x-rays were taken at the Barnes Hospital (the 

Washington University School of Medicine) ... and 

the x-ray records remained the property of the 

hospital ...” (ORAUT 2010e, p. 108).

All ORAUT 2010e, p. 108; 

Quigley 1950; Mason 1955, 

pp. 2, 14

Metallurgical 

Laboratory

“At first the dispensary facilities of Billings Hospital 

were used but after July 1944 Drexel House was 

used for this purpose”

Before July 1944 Author unknown 1946, 

p. 27

Nevada Test Site “Chest X-rays before 1960 were taken off the site at 

noncovered contractor facilities, probably 

physicians’ offices in Las Vegas” (ORAUT 2012c, p.

8).

1951–1959 (all) ORAUT 2012c

Nevada Test Site “During [1986-1995], workers continued to receive 

pre-employment physicals at contracted noncovered 

facilities in Las Vegas... These contractors might 

also have provided the periodic and termination 

chest X-rays if the worker was in Las Vegas” 

(ORAUT 2012c, p. 11).

1986–1995 preemployment X-raysORAUT 2012c; DeMarre 

2012; 

Nevada Test Site “NTS sold and removed its X-ray equipment in 

1996. After this date, all radiographic services were 

contracted out to a variety of offsite, noncovered 

facilities in Las Vegas ...” (ORAUT 2012c, p. 11).

1996–present (all) ORAUT 2012c; DeMarre 

2012; Moon 2012

Nuclear 

Materials and 

Equipment 

Corporation

“NUMEC apparently did not have its own medical Xray department during AEC operational years and 

the medical X-rays for NUMEC employees appear 

to have been performed at a local clinic or hospital” 

(ORAUT 2012b, p. 34).

All ORAUT 2012b; 

Author unknown 1978; Cain 

1964; Wieland 1981; 

Quigley 1972

Sandia National 

Laboratories

“...the Sandia Base Army Hospital and the Kirtland 

Air Force Base Dispensary are not part of the 

EEOICPA covered facilities as they are outside the 

boundaries of DOE facilities” 

X-rays taken at the 

Sandia Base 

Hospital or the 

Kirtland Air Force 

Base Dispensary

Anders 2015, p. 2

Simonds Saw 

and Steel

“Simonds X-rays were performed off site at a 

noncovered commercial facility” (ORAUT 2014c, p.

22).

All ORAUT 2014c; Tabershaw 

1948 

Stanford Linear 

Accelerator 

Center

X-rays on Be workers performed at the Palo Alto 

Clinic.

All ORAUT 2007d, p. 20; 

Pinder 1965

University of 

Rochester

X-rays taken at Strong Memorial Hospital. All Dowdy 1947, p.2

Ventron 

Corporation

Some X-rays taken at the Beverly Hospital. Some Todd 1945, p. 17

West Valley “Chest X-rays for West Valley workers have always 

been performed at an offsite location” (ORAUT 

2007b, p. 52)

All ORAUT 2007b, 2010c,

2010g
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 8 of 16

Table 3-2 lists the covered facilities where it is known that occupational medical X-rays were taken on

site or at another covered facility, according to historical documentation. Table 3-2 also lists sites that 

might have had occupational medical X-rays taken at an offsite location, but for which this cannot be 

demonstrated with certainty at present. Dose reconstructors should, therefore, include X-ray dose in 

dose reconstructions for the sites listed in Table 3-2, unless there is evidence in the claim file records 

that the X-rays were taken at a noncovered facility. 

Table 3-2. Covered facilities that administered occupational X-rays on site, or for which no historical 

evidence exists that X-rays were taken off site. 

Covered facility Notes Reference

Albuquerque Operations 

Office

All years covered None

Allied Chemical and Dye All years covered None

Amchitka “A 100 kVp -200 mA X-ray machine and associated film 

processing equipment is provided [at a special building in 

the Huskey Camp Area].”

Eberline 1973, p. 33.

Argonne National Laboratory 

– East 

“...the status of the employee's health and ability to work 

through the use of X-ray, biochemical, hematological, and 

metabolic facilities which will be available at the Site D 

dispensary.”

Hasterlik 1949, p. 4.

Baker-Perkins Company All years covered None

Battelle Columbusa 1957–2000 for King Ave, and 1957-present for West 

Jefferson.

NIOSH 2012, p. 4

Bethlehem Steel 

Corporation

All years covered None

Bliss and Laughlin Steel 

Company

All years covered None

Blockson Chemical 

Company

All years covered None

Bridgeport Brass All years covered None

Brookhaven National 

Laboratory

All years covered None

Canoga Avenue Facility All years covered None

Carborundum Company All years covered None

Chapman Valve All years covered None

Clarksville Modification 

Center

All years covered None

Clinton Engineer Works All years covered None

Combustion Engineering All years covered None

Connecticut Aircraft 

Nuclear Engine Laboratory

All years covered None

Dayton Project (Units I, III, 

and IV)

All years covered None

De Soto Avenue Facility All years covered None

Dow Chemical Company All years covered None

Dow Chemical Company 

(Madison Site)

All years covered None

Downey Facility All years covered None

DuPont Deepwater Works All years covered None

Electro Metallurgical All years covered None

Extrusion Planta 1981–2006 covered ORAUT 2007a

Fernald “It is possible that some of the X-ray examinations were 

performed off the [Fernald] site at local area hospitals, but 

there does not seem to be a fixed pattern, and no clear 

evidence exists in relation to when or for whom this might 

have occurred.”

ORAUT 2014b, p. 9

General Atomics “A former GA nurse recalled that chest X-rays were required 

for beryllium workers and stated the X-ray examinations 

were conducted at La Jolla Radiology.” No historical 

documentation found to support this statement.

ORAUT 2008a, p. 47
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 9 of 16

Covered facility Notes Reference

General Electric Company 

(Ohio)

All years covered None

General Steel All years covered None

Grand Junctiona 1962–1969 covered Stoller undated, p. 10

Kansas City Planta Before 1997 covered ORAUT 2006a, p. 15; 

Todd 2004, p. 3

Hanford X-rays taken at Kadlec Hospital from 1944-1956 are now to 

be included in dose reconstruction, as the AEC owned 

Kadlec during this time.

Travis 1956

Harshaw “Continue to use the services of the Radiological Clinic or its 

equivalent, but all X-rays should be obtained from them and 

kept in a locked fireproof cabinet in the dispensary” 

(Belmore 1948, p. 123), or the “X-ray laboratory in 

Cleveland” (Tabershaw 1950). 

Belmore 1948;

Tabershaw 1950

Hood Building All years covered None

Hooker Electrochemical All years covered None

Horizons, Inc. All years covered None

Huntington Pilot Plant All years covered None

Idaho National Laboratory 

and Argonne National 

Laboratory-West

“Offsite facilities might have been contracted to perform the 

examinations.” 

ORAUT 2009, p. 9

Iowa Army Ammunition 

Plant

All years covered NIOSH 2011, p. 6-7.

Joslyn Manufacturing and 

Supply Company

All years covered None

K-25 Plant All years covered None

Lake Ontario Ordnance 

Works

All years covered None

Lawrence Berkeley 

National Laboratorya

1964–1995 covered ORAUT 2010d, pp. 22–23; 

Parker 1963; 

Grondona 2010

Lawrence Livermore 

National Laboratory

All years covered None

Los Alamos National 

Laboratory

All years covered None

Medina Modification Center Some records indicate the X-rays might have been taken 

offsite at the Minter X-ray Clinic.

Claim file records

Metallurgical Laboratorya July 1944 and later covered Author unknown 1946

Metals and Controls All years covered None

Mound Plant All years covered None

Nevada Test Sitea 1960–1985, 1986–1995 other than pre-employment X-rays

covered

ORAUT 2012c, pp. 8–11; 

DeMarre 2012; 

Moon, 2012

Norton Company All years covered None

Nuclear Metals, Inc. All years covered None

Oak Ridge National 

Laboratory

All years covered None

Pacific Northwest National 

Laboratory

Same as Hanford from 1965 onward. ORAUT 2007c, p. 6

Pacific Proving Ground “The dose reconstructor should use the occupational 

medical dose TBD related to the participant's employer and 

associated DOE site to determine X-ray dose.”

ORAUT 2006b, pp. 10–11

Paducah Gaseous 

Diffusion Plant

All years covered None

Pantex Plant All years covered None

Pinellas Plant All years covered None

Piqua Organic Moderated 

Reactor

All years covered None

Portsmouth Gaseous 

Diffusion Plant

All years covered None

Revere Copper and Brass All years covered None
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 10 of 16

Covered facility Notes Reference

Rocky Flats Plant All years covered None

S-50 Plant All years covered None

SAM Laboratories, 

Columbia University

All years covered None

Sandia National 

Laboratoriesa

X-rays are assumed to have been taken on site except 

those marked Sandia Base Hospital and/or Kirtland Air 

Force Base Dispensary.

Anders 2015

Sandia National 

Laboratories, Livermore

“The X-ray machine equipment was removed from the site 

in approximately 1990 ...” (ORAUT 2014d, p. 22)

After 1990, X-rays were performed at Lawrence Livermore 

National Laboratory, a covered facility.

ORAUT 2014d; 

McDowell-Boyer 2006

Santa Susana Field 

Laboratory (Area IV)

“By 1998, all radiographic examinations were subcontracted 

to West Hills Hospital in West Hills, California” (ORAUT 

2008b, p. 11). No historical documentation found to support 

this statement.

ORAUT 2008b, pp. 11, 14

Savannah River Site All years covered None

Spencer Chemical 

Company/Jayhawk Works

All years covered None

St. Louis Airport Storage 

Site

All years covered None

Standard Oil Company of 

New Jersey

All years covered None

Superior Steel All years covered None

Tennessee Valley Authority All years covered None

Texas City Chemicals All years covered None

Titanium Alloy 

Manufacturing Company

All years covered None

Tyson Valley Powder Farm All years covered None

United Nuclear Corporation All years covered None

Ventron Corporationa Some X-rays taken at the Beverly Hospital. Todd 1945, p. 17; 

NIOSH 2012, pp. 34–35.

Vitro Manufacturing All years covered None

W. R. Grace (Tennessee) All years covered None

Wah Chang All years covered None

Weldon Spring Plant All years covered None

Westinghouse Atomic 

Power Development Plant

All years covered None

Westinghouse Electric 

Corporation (New Jersey)

All years covered None

Winchester Engineering 

and Analytical Center

All years covered None

Y-12 Plant All years covered None

a. See also Table 3-1.

Dose reconstructions are also performed for sites which may not be listed here. In reconstructing 

doses for these claims, dose reconstructors should use any available historical documentation or 

evidence in claim file records to assign X-ray dose in accordance with the guidance in this TIB. 

Where historical documentation of offsite X-ray doses has not been found, and energy employee 

medical records are not provided, dose reconstructors should generally assume that occupational 

medical X-ray exposure occurred on site at the covered facility where the energy employee worked.

X-ray dose assignment for construction trade workers (CTWs) should be the same as for other energy 

employees described in this TIB. In other words, dose reconstructors should assume that CTWs had 

X-rays taken on site at the covered facility where they worked, unless evidence shows that these 

X-rays were taken off site at a noncovered facility.
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 11 of 16

The guidance in this TIB supersedes previous guidance on the issue of assignment of X-ray dose at 

covered facilities that might be found in the following documents or in site profiles issued before this 

TIB:

• Revision 04 of ORAUT-OTIB-0006, Dose Reconstruction from Occupational Medical X-Ray 

Procedures (ORAUT 2011); 

• Revision 02 of ORAUT-OTIB-0052, Parameters to Consider When Processing Claims for 

Construction Trade Workers (ORAUT 2014e); 

• Revision 01 of ORAUT-PROC-0006, External Dose Reconstruction (ORAUT 2006c); and

• Revision 03 of ORAUT-PROC-0061, Occupational Medical X-Ray Dose Reconstruction for 

DOE Sites (ORAUT 2010f). 
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 12 of 16

REFERENCES

Amstein, T., 2008, “Battelle Response to Questions about X-Ray Screening Program,” letter to B. 

Irvine (Stoller Corporation/Source One Management), Battelle Columbus Environment, Safety, 

Health, and Quality, Columbus, Ohio, July 1. [SRDB Ref ID: 47125]

Anders, K., 2015, “Re: question about covered facilities,” e-mail to T. A. Gilbertson (NIOSH), Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., May 18. 

[SRDB Ref ID: 143891]

Author unknown, 1946, Manhattan District History Book I – General, Volume 7 - Medical Program, 

December 31. [SRDB Ref ID: 40434]

Author unknown, 1948, “The State Insurance Fund,” summary of testimony and proceedings at 

hearing, Held in Buffalo, New York, July 2. [SRDB Ref ID: 16316, p. 15]

Author unknown, 1986a, “Medical File of [name redacted].” [SRDB Ref ID: 120268]

Author unknown, 1986b, “Medical File of [name redacted].” [SRDB Ref ID: 120270]

Author unknown, 1978, collection of personnel and medical records – claimant [name redacted]. 

[SRDB Ref ID: 27768, p. 189].

Beckerley, J. G., 1948, “Medical Monitoring Program,” letter to G. White, Jr. (The Kellex Corporation), 

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, New York Operations Office, New York, New York, 

October 26. [SRDB Ref ID: 11094] 

Belmore, F. M., 1948, “Clinical and Medical Program,” letter to S. S. Parks (Harshaw Chemical 

Company), U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, New York Operations Office, New York, 

New York, October 29. [SRDB Ref ID: 10641, p. 122] 

Cain, F. Jr., 1964, “Duties of the Nurse,” memorandum to R. Westerman, Nuclear Materials and 

Equipment Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, April 16. [SRDB Ref ID: 27750, p. 37]

DeMarre, M., 2012, “RE: Additional X-Ray Related Questions (NTS) Related to Request (NTS FY12-

001),” e-mail to D. G. Morris (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), National Security 

Technologies, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 14. [SRDB Ref ID: 112248]

Dowdy, A. H., 1947, ”Stereo Mini Chest Plates for Atomic Energy Project Personnel,” memorandum to 

Dr. G. M. Suter, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, April 21. [SRDB Ref ID: 30707] 

Eberline (Eberline Instrument Company), 1973, Project Cannikin On-Site Radiological Safety and 

Medical Services Final Report, NVO-0294-6, Santa Fe, New Mexico, August. [SRDB Ref ID: 

25131]

Freeman, E. J., 1975, “Occupational Health Aspects of a Fluoride Volatility Process,” Conference on 

Occupational Health Aspects of Uranium, Held at Stouffer’s National Center Inn, Arlington, 

Virginia, April 28–30, 1975, ERDA-93, U.S. Energy Research and Development 

Administration, Washington, D.C. [SRDB Ref ID: 4613, p. 178] 

Grondona, C. E., 2010, “Re: question about LBNL X-ray equipment,” e-mail to E. M. Thomas (Oak 

Ridge Associated Universities Team), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, 

California, May 2. [SRDB Ref ID: 81017]
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 13 of 16

Hasterlik, R. J., 1949, “Health Program as it Relates to the Individual Employee and the Laboratory,” 

letter to Dr. H. Lisco, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, April 25. [SRDB Ref ID: 

18912, p. 3] 

Hibbitts, H. W., and W. A. Pryor, 1970, Health and Nuclear Safety Appraisal Reactive Metals Inc. 

Extrusion Plant, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Oak Ridge Operations Office, Oak Ridge, 

Tennessee, May. [SRDB Ref ID: 26445, p. 3] 

Holmes, A. R. 1944, untitled memorandum to S. P. Murphy, Linde Air Products Company, Linde 

Ceramics Plant, Tonawanda, New York, January 26. [SRDB Ref ID: 12382, p. 5] 

Jelinek, T. M., 1971, Health And Nuclear Safety Appraisal, RMI Company, Extrusion Plant, U.S. 

Atomic Energy Commission, Oak Ridge Office, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, August. [SRDB Ref 

ID: 25372, p. 8] 

Johnson, W. A., 1976, Annual Health Protection, Nuclear Criticality and Transportation Safety 

Appraisal of RMI Company, U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Oak 

Ridge Office, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, April. [SRDB Ref ID: 25372, p. 28] 

Linde (Linde Air Products Company), 1950, collection of health and personal records and clinical 

chronologies, Linde Ceramics Plant, Tonawanda, New York. [SRDB Ref ID: 11156, pp. 30, 

43, 50]

Mason, M. G., 1955, Mallinckrodt Chemical Works Health Program Policies, Status, and Summary, 

February 21. [SRDB Ref ID: 4338, p. 23,35] 

McDowell-Boyer, L., 2006, Notes from Visit to SNL/CA on 4/12/06, ALARA Environmental Analysis, 

Pleasanton, California. [SRDB Ref ID: 23574]

Moon, J. C., 2012, “Request X-Ray Surveillance/Testing Information (NTS)” e-mail to M. DeMarre, 

National Security Technologies, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 15. [SRDB Ref ID: 112245]

Nickson, J. J., 1943, untitled letter to C. E. Daniels, University of Chicago, Metallurgical Laboratory, 

Chicago, Illinois, June 29. [SRDB Ref ID: 11581] 

NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), 2010, Radiation Exposures Covered 

for Dose Reconstructions under Part B of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 

Compensation Program Act, DCAS-IG-003, Rev. 01, Division of Compensation Analysis and 

Support, Cincinnati, OH, October 5. 

NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), 2011, Technical Basis Document for 

Atomic Energy Operations at the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant (IAAP), DCAS-TKBS-0001, 

Rev. 01, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, Cincinnati, OH, October 20. 

NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), 2012, SEC Petition Evaluation Report 

SEC-ER-00198, August 14, p. 34-35.

NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), 2012, SEC Petition Evaluation Report 

SEC-ER-00208, November 19, p. 4. 

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2006a, Site Profile for the Kansas City Plant, 

ORAUT-TKBS-0031, Rev. 00 PC-1, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, January 6.
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 14 of 16

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2006b, Summary Site Profile for the Pacific 

Proving Ground, ORAUT-TKBS-0052, Rev. 00, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, August 30.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2006c, External Dose Reconstruction, ORAUTPROC-0006, Rev. 01, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, June 5.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2007a, Summary of Extrusion Plant Site 

Information for Dose Reconstruction, ORAUT-TKBS-0056, Rev. 00, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,

April 26.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2007b, Site Profile for the West Valley 

Demonstration Project, ORAUT-TKBS-0057, Rev. 00 PC-1, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 

August 17.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2007c, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory – 

Occupational Medical Dose, ORAUT-TKBS-0027-3, Rev. 01, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, June 18.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2007d, Site Profile for the Stanford Linear 

Accelerator Center, ORAUT-TKBS-0051, Rev. 01, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, August 17.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2008a, Site Profile for General Atomics, ORAUTTKBS-0045, Rev. 00, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, September 26.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2008b, Area IV of the Santa Susana Field 

Laboratory, the Canoga Avenue Facility (Vanowen Building), the Downey Facility, and the De 

Soto Avenue Facility (sometimes referred to as Energy Technology Engineering Center 

[ETEC] or Atomics International) – Occupational Medical Dose, ORAUT-TKBS-0038-3, 

Rev. 02, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, October 31.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2009, Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne 

National Laboratory-West – Occupational Medical Dose, ORAUT-TKBS-0007-3, Rev. 02, Oak 

Ridge, Tennessee, December 21.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2010a, Site Profile for Battelle Memorial Institute, 

King Avenue and West Jefferson Sites, Columbus, Ohio, ORAUT-TKBS-0058, Rev. 00, Oak 

Ridge, Tennessee, March 26.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2010b, untitled memorandum to File, Oak Ridge, 

Tennessee, December 3. [SRDB Ref ID: 90744]

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2010c, “Excerpts from Claim File Records of 

West Valley Workers,” memorandum to file, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, December 10. [SRDB 

Ref ID: 90920]

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2010d, Site Profile for the Lawrence Berkeley 

National Laboratory, ORAUT-TKBS-0049, Rev. 02, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, May 10.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2010e, Basis for Development of an Exposure

Matrix for the Mallinckrodt Chemical Company St. Louis Downtown Site and the St. Louis 

Airport Site, St. Louis, Missouri, ORAUT-TKBS-0005, Rev. 03, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 

November 22.
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 15 of 16

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2010f, Occupational Medical X-Ray Dose 

Reconstruction for DOE Sites, ORAUT-PROC-0061, Rev. 03, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 

March 3.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2010g, “Location of Occupational Medical X-rays 

for West Valley Workers,” documented communication with West Valley Environmental 

Services employee, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, December 13. [SRDB Ref ID: 90938]

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2011, Dose Reconstruction from Occupational 

Medical X-Ray Procedures, ORAUT-OTIB-0006, Rev. 04, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, June 20.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2012a, Site Profile for Ames Laboratory, ORAUTTKBS-0055, Rev. 03, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, January 3.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2012b, Site Profile for Nuclear Materials and 

Equipment Corporation, Apollo and Parks Township, Pennsylvania, ORAUT-TKBS-0041,

Rev. 02, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, November 26. 

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2012c, Nevada Test Site – Occupational Medical 

Dose, ORAUT-TKBS-0008-3, Rev. 02, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, November 26. 

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2014a, Site Profile for Allied Chemical 

Corporation Plant, ORAUT-TKBS-0044, Rev. 02, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, May 5.

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2014b, Fernald Environmental Management 

Project – Occupational Medical Dose, ORAUT-TKBS-0017-3, Rev. 01, Oak Ridge, 

Tennessee, January 2. 

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2014c, Site Profile for Simonds Saw and Steel, 

ORAUT-TKBS-0032, Rev. 02, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, October 21. 

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2014d, Summary Site Profile for Sandia National 

Laboratories in Livermore, California, ORAUT-TKBS-0053, Rev. 01, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,

April 28. 

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2014e, Parameters to Consider When 

Processing Claims for Construction Trade Workers, ORAUT-OTIB-0052, Rev. 02, Oak Ridge, 

Tennessee, July 24. 

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2015a, Basis for the Development of an 

Exposure Matrix for Aliquippa Forge, Pennsylvania, Period of Operation: January 1, 1947 

through February 28, 1950, ORAUT-TKBS-0021, Rev. 02, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 

November 16. 

ORAUT (Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team), 2015b, An Exposure Matrix for Linde Ceramics 

Plant (including Tonawanda Laboratory), ORAUT-TKBS-0025, Rev. 04, Oak Ridge, 

Tennessee, May 8.

Parker, H. G., 1963, “Medical Program,” memorandum to R. Connell, October 11. [SRDB Ref ID: 

72126, p. 4]

Pinder, F., 1965, “Blanket order, Palo Alto Medical Clinic,” memorandum to D. Littlefield, Palo Alto, 

California, June 29. [SRDB Ref ID: 23251] 
Document No. ORAUT-OTIB-0079 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 03/18/2016 Page 16 of 16

Quigley, J. A., 1950, “Visit to Mallinckrodt Chemical Works - May 24-25, 1950,” memorandum to Files, 

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, New York Operations Office, June 6. [SRDB Ref ID: 3967, 

p. 3]

Quigley, J. A., 1972, untitled letter to C. C. Booth, National Lead Company of Ohio, Cincinnati, Ohio, 

April 18. [SRDB Ref ID: 42281] 

Stoller (S. M. Stoller Corporation), undated, U.S. Department of Energy, Grand Junction Office, Site 

X-Ray History, Grand Junction, Colorado. [SRDB Ref ID: 3325, p. 9]

Tabershaw, I. R., 1948, untitled letter to B. S. Wolf (U.S. Atomic Energy Commission), Liberty Mutual 

Company, New York, New York, December 15. [SRDB Ref ID: 11226, p. 5]

Tabershaw, I. R., 1949a, ”Vulcan Crucible Steel Co., Aliquippa, PA,” memorandum to B.S. Wolf (U.S. 

Atomic Energy Commission), March 29. [SRDB Ref ID: 12998] 

Tabershaw, I. R., 1949b, “Battelle Memorial Institute,” memorandum to File, June 10. [SRDB Ref ID: 

8953, p. 3] 

Tabershaw, I. R., 1950, “Visit to Harshaw Chemical Company - January 14, 1950,” memorandum to 

Files, January 24. [SRDB Ref ID: 45244] 

Todd, B. P., 1945, untitled letter to J. W. Howland (Office of the Medical Section), Beverly Hospital, 

Beverly, Massachusetts, July 27. [SRDB Ref ID: 10265, p. 17] 

Todd, M., 2004, “Questions for KCP Technical Basis Document,” letter to J. Fix (Oak Ridge 

Associated Universities Team), August 19. [SRDB Ref ID: 14706]

Travis, J. E., 1956, Bill of Sale, Kadlec Methodist Hospital, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Hanford 

Operations Office, Richland, Washington, September 10. [SRDB Ref ID: 148429] 

Van Horn, E. L., 1943, untitled letter to T. J. Coleman (Linde Air Products Company), U.S. Engineer 

Office, Kenmore, New York, September 4. [SRDB Ref ID: 12382, p. 20]

Voss, M. D., 1957, untitled letter to P. Van Bemmel and J. Bacon (McFarland Clinic), Ames 

Laboratory, Ames, Iowa, February 8. [SRDB Ref ID: 25846]

Wieland, W. F., 1981, “FY-82 Cost Reduction Program,” memorandum to R. V. Carlson, Babcock & 

Wilcox, Apollo, Pennsylvania, January 28. [SRDB Ref ID: 27858, p. 62]