alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTONIO GERMAINE JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH; 4:06-cv-00606-CWH) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 3, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Germaine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William Earl Day, II, Rose Mary Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Antonio Germaine Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group, Subcommittee A — Cancer Centers.                    

*Date:*                         April 22-23, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Crown Plaza Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gail J. Bryant, MD, Scientific Review Officer, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Blvd, Room 8107, MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD 20892-8329, (301) 402-0801,                         *gb30t@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

 Dated: February 14, 2008.

 Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 08-794 Filed 2-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FORM OF CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 AND 15D-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Marie M. May, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of HomeLife, Inc.;

2.   based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Annual Report is being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Annual Report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and (c) presented in this Quarterly Report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
Annual Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  September 7, 2005                     s/ Marie M. May
                                             ---------------
                                             Name: Marie M. May
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending March 31, 2011 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/ Anthony Pizzacalla


Anthony Pizzacalla


President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer and Director








Date: May 20, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

MING WEI, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

HEALTH, PENNSYLVANIA STATE CIVIL 

SERVICE COMMISSION, VERONICA 

URDANETA, STEPHEN OSTROFF, 

TIFFANY BURNHAUSER, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 606 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Thomas Morrow, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Home School Holdings, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify to my knowledge that:  (1)
The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  HOME SCHOOL HOLDINGS, INC.

/s/ Thomas Morrow(Registrant)

Thomas MorrowChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Authorized Officer) Dated: January 26, 2010
Ex. 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Tor Olav Troim, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 20-F of  Knightsbridge  Tankers
Limited;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 12, 2003


 /s/ Tor Olav Troim

Tor Olav Troim
Chief Executive Officer
ABRWH
 

Agenda
 

Subcommittee on Procedures Review 

May 16, 2016 

Conference Call Number 1-866-659-0537 

Participant Pass Code 9933701 

11:00am EDT Welcome and Roll Call 

11:10 Review BRS status All 

11:25 Y-12 active issues – 

OTIB 0013 – Assign OTIB 044 Review to close 

OTIB 0029 – Assign TBD Review to close 

11:40 ORAUT OTIB 0026 - Expanded “close” proposal SC&A 

11:45 ORAU OTIB 0032 – Status report on protocol review SC&A 

11:55 OCAS-TIB-0014 – Assign TBD Review to close 

12:00 ORAUT-OTIB-0039 – Responses to NIOSH SC&A 

12:30 Lunch 

1:30 pm	 ORAUT-OTIB-0050 – TBD review status SC&A 

ORAUT-OTIB-0060 - Responses review status NIOSH/SC&A 

ORAU PROC 0042 – OTIB 64 status NIOSH 

ORAU-RPRT-0044 – Response review status NIOSH/SC&A 

2:30 PER 0057 – Assignment of review cases SC&A 

PER 003 - Open item status NIOSH 

PER 005 - Response review status SC&A 

PER 008 - Status SC&A 

PER 011 – Status SC&A 

PER 029 - Response review status SC&A 

PER 0031- Report review - carryover NIOSH* 

PER 0042 – Status 

PER 0045 - proposed resolution to responses SC&A * 

PER 0047 - Findings 3, 4 NIOSH * 

PER 0053 – Review status SC&A 

PER 0055 – Review status SC&A 

3:30 Break 

3:45 Administrative detail -

Routine note of abeyance items ready for closing NIOSH 

Status of case selection recommendations SC&A 

Need for new tasking - PROC 0006 KBehling 

Next meeting 

4:00 Adjourn 

*carryover
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7003

GEORGE R. WERTZ, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEE FOSTER, Sheriff; JERRY WRIGHT; TODD JOHNSON; DANNY GILLIAM; DAVID E. RUSHTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-96-2858-4-22BE)

Submitted: November 17, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George R. Wertz, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Spencer Verner, III,

Newberry, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Wertz, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment against him on his complaint filed under 42

U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985(3), 1986 (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Wertz v. Foster, No. CA-96-2858-4-22BE (D.S.C. June 5,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6008 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6008

 To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to withdraw the outer 
 Continental Shelf in the Mid-Atlantic planning area from disposition, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2018

Mr. McEachin (for himself and Mr. Jones) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to withdraw the outer 
 Continental Shelf in the Mid-Atlantic planning area from disposition, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defend our Coast Act''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL FROM DISPOSITION OF MID-ATLANTIC OUTER CONTINENTAL 
              SHELF.

    Section 12 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1341) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Withdrawal From Disposition of Mid-Atlantic Outer Continental 
Shelf.--The Secretary may not issue a lease for the exploration, 
development, or production of oil or gas on the outer Continental Shelf 
in the Mid-Atlantic planning area.''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT PHILLIP HUNTER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-3001 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed July 2, 2014. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Marion L. Fleming, A ssociate Senio r Judge. Phillip Hunter, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bilal A. Faruqui, Assistant A ttorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Phillip Hunter appeals an order adjudicating him guilty of dir ect criminal contempt, imposing a fine, and committing him to jail for five days. The direct contempt charge arose from a civil matter in which Mr. Hunter became obs tructive and profane during the proceedings. The reco rd suggests that the jail sent ence may have been fully served already. But even if it has been served, the case is no t moot, and procedural due process concerns compel us to reverse the contempt order.- 2 - Mr. Hunter maintains that the trial court did not satisfy the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 in several respects. He claims that it failed to apprise him of the accusation against him, failed to offer him an opportunity to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty, failed to give him an opportunity to present excusing or mitigating evidence, and failed to pronounce his se ntence in open court. Although we do not disturb the trial court's findings with resp ect to Mr. Hunter's contemptuous conduct, we must rev erse the contempt order becaus e the record does not demonstrate that the trial court satisfied these procedural requirements. On remand, the trial court is not required by our mandate to c onduct further proceedings. If the trial court determines that it is appropriate to reinstate the judgment of contempt, it must conduct a hearing, upon proper no tice to Mr. Hunter, in order to give him an opportunity to show cause why he should no t be adjudged guilty and to afford him an opportunity to present mitigating or excus ing evidence. Following any hearing, if the court determines the judgment of contempt s hould be reinstated, it should give due regard to principles of double jeopardy when im posing any sanction.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND, VILLANTI, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20834 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus BETTY JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-92-146-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Betty Jordan appeals from her resentencing on remand. She argues that this court erred by failing to order on remand either a new trial or a hearing in the district court to determine whether a new trial should be granted and that the district court erred in resentencing her by unreasonably departing upwards from the sentencing range. We have reviewed the record andNo. 95-20834 -2- find no reversible error. Additionally, the first issue raised by Jordan is not properly before this court on appeal. See Burroughs v. FFP Operating Partners, L.P. , 70 F.3d 31, 33 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7592-7593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 8, 2008, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Network Centric Operations 
Industry Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Themis Computer, Fremont, CA; Wind River 
Systems, Alameda, CA; SteelCloud, Herndon, VA; SGI, Mountain View, CA; 
and S.C. SIVECO Romania S.A., Bucharest, Romania have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned

[[Page 7593]]

activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 19, 2004, Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 
2005 (70 FR 5486).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 12, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 62866).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 08-562 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M