alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30242 Conference Calendar

LARRIANTE SUMBRY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY CITY POLICE; CECIL DAVIS, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:05-CV-75

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larriante Sumbry, Indiana prisoner # 965137, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which the district court construed as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Sumbry does not set forth argument citing to the record and fails to identify error in the district court’s determinations and conclusions. When an appellant fails to identify error in the district court’s decision, it is as if the appellant had not appealed that judgment. See Brinkmann v.No. 05-30242 -2- Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987 ). Sumbry’s appeal is therefore DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Timothy J. Neher, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Treasurer of ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS I, INC. (the
“Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 12th day of May, 2010.





/s/ Timothy J. NeherTimothy
      J. NeherChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS I, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED
ACQUISITIONS I, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Special Exposure Cohort 

Update 

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

November 2014 

 Redondo Beach, CA 
Purpose 

 Update the Advisory Board 

 Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) summary 

 Petitions currently under Board review 

 Potential SEC petitions (83.14) 

 Provide updates for future Board work group 

sessions and meeting preparations 
SEC Summary Table 

(as of October 28, 2014) 

 Petitions received 222

 Petitions in qualification process 4 

 Petitions qualified for evaluation 133

• NIOSH evaluation in progress 2 

• NIOSH evaluation completed 131

– SEC Evaluation Reports 

 with the Advisory Board 

 for recommendation 10 

 Petitions not qualifying for evaluation 85

Note: Petitions not qualifying include five petitions received prior to the 

rule becoming final and Petition 34 where the site was de-listed. 
Petitions in Qualification 

• SEC-0217, Westinghouse Electric Corp., 

Bloomfield, NJ (1950-2001, Residual Period) 

• SEC-0220, Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 

(1944-1945)

• SEC-0221, Lawrence Livermore National 

Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1974-2014)

• Grand Junction Operations Office, CO 

(1986-1990) 
Petitions being Evaluated 

• SEC-0216, Dow Chemical Corporation, Walnut 

Creek, CA (1947-1957) 

• Expected Completion: Jan. 2015 

• SEC-0219, Idaho National Laboratory, 

Scoville, ID (1949-1970)

• Expected Completion: Feb. 2015 
Currently under Board Review 

 Awaiting initial Board action 

• SEC-0210, Kansas City Plant 
Sites with remaining evaluation periods awaiting action 

Fernald 

(SEC-0046)

1984-1989 Sandia National Laboratories - 

Albuquerque 

(SEC-0188)

1995-2011

Grand Junction 

Operations Office 

(SEC-0175)

1975-2006 Santa Susana Field Laboratory 

(SEC-0093)

1965

Hanford 

(SEC-0057)

1984-1990 Savannah River Site

(SEC-0103)

1973-2007

Los Alamos National 

Laboratory (SEC-0109)

1996-2005 St. Louis Airport Storage Site 

(SEC-0150)

1972-1973; 

1984-1998

Rocky Flats Plant 

(SEC-0192)

1984-2005
Potential SEC Petitions (83.14) 

 Sandia National Laboratories – Albuquerque (1945-48)

 Dayton Project Monsanto (modify based on change in 

facility designation) 

• Changed to a Department of Energy facility 

• Add the 9-month period when operations were being shifted 

from “The Dayton Project” to Mound
Questions?
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form F-3 (Nos. 333-109876, 333-111512 and 333-119750 ) and onForms S-3 (Nos. 333-128377, 333-138872 and 333-139662) and on Forms S-8(Nos. 333-63580, 333-133258 and 333-140041) of World HeartCorporation of our report dated March 29, 2007 relating to the financialstatements which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
| /s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |
|--------------------------------------|
| Ottawa, Canada                       |
| March 29, 2007                  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act), I, Larry J. Weick, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Syntroleum Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to
the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                      |  |                          
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Dated: March 22, 2004 |  | /s/ Larry J. Weick       
|                      |  | Larry J. Weick           
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer  



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, James Edward Lynch, Jr., President and
Chief Executive Officer of FreeButton, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FreeButton Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FreeButton, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: November 19, 2013 |    
|------------------------ | ---
|                         |    
|                         | By:
|                         |    
|                         |    
|                         |    
|                         |
April 9, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE WAYLAND HUR ST

NO. 14

- 12

- 01151

- CR

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
quarterly report of American Sands Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal financial officer of
the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 19, 2013







/s/ Daniel F. Carlson

Daniel F. Carlson, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6522

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

PAUL BERNARD COLEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District 

Judge. (3:09-cr-00207-JRS-1; 3:13-cv-00585-JRS)

Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Bernard Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean Siebert, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Paul Bernard Coleman seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Coleman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

            CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rayovac Corporation (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall
J. Steward, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


     /s/ Randall J. Steward
---------------------------------------------
Name:    Randall J. Steward
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    May 2, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 23, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 23, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15A0893. HUNTING CREEK RETAIL, LLC v. HMS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,

INC. d/b/a GEORGIA CAREER INSTITUTE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 8330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Workgroup Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Strategic Plan Workgroup 
organized by the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC).
    This workgroup meeting will be closed to the public with attendance 
limited to invited participants. The purpose of the meeting is to 
discuss and prioritize proposed research initiatives that will be used 
in the development of the IACC strategic plan for Autism Spectrum 
Disorder (ASD) research. The next meeting of the IACC, which will be 
open to the public and at which research priorities will be discussed, 
is March 14, 2008.

    Name of Committee: Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee 
(IACC).
    Type of Meeting: Strategic Plan Workgroup.
    Date: February 21, 2008.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: Discussion of proposed research initiatives developed by 
Strategic Plan Workshops for development of the IACC strategic plan 
for Autism Spectrum Disorders research; prioritization and possible 
modification of the initiatives.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Building 31--Room 4A52, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Tanya Pryor, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, 6001 Executive Boulevard, NSC, Room 6198, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9669, 301-443-7153.
    Information about the IACC is available on the Web site: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research-funding/scientific-meetings/recurring-meetings/iacc/index.shtml.


    Dated: February 5, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-600 Filed 2-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I,  Andre Benard, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Calibert Explorations Ltd.. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  October15, 2009/s/  Andre BenardBy:Andre BenardPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         321,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,216,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,716,671
<INVENTORY>                                  5,449,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,556,011
<PP&E>                                       8,961,693
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,660,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,728,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,726,114
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,589
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,394,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,728,304
<SALES>                                     18,718,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,718,113
<CGS>                                       12,211,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,346,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (231,620)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,072,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,680,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,680,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,680,942)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)
        

</TABLE>
ABRWH

Work Group on TBD-6000 

September 20, 2011 

9:00 a.m. EDT 

Cincinnati Airport Marriott Hotel

 Conference Phone: 866-659-0537 

Participant Code: 9933701 

AGENDA

Note: Lunch break at 12:00 noon. Adjournment no later than 5:00 pm. 

1. Roll Call and Call to Order (Ted Katz and Paul Ziemer)

2. Introductory remarks and review of Agenda (Paul Ziemer)

3. Overview of General Steel Industries timeline for operational and residual periods 

and radiation sources under consideration with respect to SEC Petition 00105 

(Paul Ziemer)

4. Consideration of August 2011 NIOSH White Paper on GSI Dose Estimates for 

Portable Radiography Sources, including SC&A evaluations (Dave Allen and Bob 

Anigstein)

a. Exposure model for radium radiography 

b. Exposure model for St. Louis Testing radiography (Ir-192 and Co-60) 

c. Exposure model for portable X-ray radiography 

d. Exposure model for Co-60 radiography 

5. Review of SC&A Findings and Issue Resolution Matrix for GSI SEC Petition00105, including implications of the proposed NIOSH exposure models for 

isotopic and x-ray radiography sources. 

6. Adjourn
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SHANE BOZEMAN, SR., DOC #577318, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4675

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed August 16, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota 

County; Thomas Krug, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Dane K. Chase, Special Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Lapinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: May 16, 2011By: /s/ Thomas LapinskiThomas LapinskiChief Executive Officer