alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | 12 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Research and Development [Abstract]**                        |            |   |
| Company-sponsored research and development costs               | $ 311           | $ 310 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Research and development expense excluding acquired in process cost and including software.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**hrs_ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseExcludingAcquiredInProcessCostAndIncludingSoftware**Namespace Prefix:**hrs_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_ResearchAndDevelopmentAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
ERIC EUGENE FULLER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 4

- 4123

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed October 9, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and M. J. Lord , Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee, for Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bo ndi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese

, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, MARSTILLER, and OS TERHAUS , JJ., CONCUR.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 25, 2020

No. 04-18-00002-CR

Larry Donnell GIBBS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015 CRR 001320 D-1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On January 17, 2017, appellant filed a letter we construe as a motion for 

rehearing. After consideration, appellant’s motion is DENIED. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11639 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LAWRENCE MARTIN BOONE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18

- CR

- 8

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Lawrence Martin Boone has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Boone h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 15, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11639 Document: 00515078113 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2019No. 18

- 11639

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further respon sibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-11639 Document: 00515078113 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2019
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141879 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141879 

 COA: 291334 

Kalamazoo CC: 2008-000570-FC 

ANTHONY JUAN ALLEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NUMBER 13-13-00447-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

EB INTERNATIONAL, LLC, 

AND HIDALGO LOGISITICS, 

LLC, D/B/A HIDALGO COLD 

STORAGE, A TEXAS LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellants,

v.

JENROB INVESTMENTS, 

LP, A TEXAS LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 332nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam
2

On, October 11, 2013, appellants, EB International, LLC, and Hidalgo Logistics, 

LLC, d/b/a Hidalgo Cold Storage, a Texas Limited Liability Company, filed a suggestion of 

bankruptcy in this appeal. According to the notice, appellant Hidalgo Logistics, LLC filed 

a bankruptcy petition on May 15, 2013, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. 

Upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, an automatic stay becomes effective which 

prohibits the commencement or continuation of any judicial action or proceeding against 

the debtor and any property within the debtor's bankruptcy estate. See 11 U.S.C.A. §

362(a). Pursuant to Rule 8.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal is 

suspended. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED until further order of this Court. Any 

documents filed subsequent to the bankruptcy petition will remain pending until the 

appeal is reinstated. The parties are directed to take such action as is appropriate to 

advise the Court of any change in the status of the bankruptcy proceeding which would 

affect the status of this appeal, including but not limited to, the filing of a motion to 

reinstate pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3. See id. 8.3.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

28th day of October, 2013.
SERVIC,
~~ eS.

s sg ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH
SC 4676 Columbia Parkway, M

1-46
Cincinnati, Ohio 45
(513) 533-6825

April 30, 2008 23 A
3 02
CHAIRMAN: =_
= <
Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. =
‘afeyette, Indians The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt ~ Ss
Secretary of Health and Human Services 0D 8
MEMBERS: Department of Health and Human Services a 2
aw pens 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. pa ¢
Richland, Washington Washington, DC 20201 & c
Bradley P. Clawson
Rexburg, Idaho Dear Mr. Secretary:
Michael H. Gibs:
Franklin, Ohio en The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has
sn evaluated SEC Petition-00059 concerning all X-ray technologists and
Salem, New Hampshire materials scientists who worked at Sandia National Laboratory —
James E. Lockey, M.D Livermore in the X-ray Diffraction and Fluorescence Laboratory,
Cincinnati, Ohio Building 913 — Room 113, and Building 913 — Room 128 from
James M. Melius, M.D., Ph.D. December 1, 1967 through December 31, 1990. NIOSH has
Albany, New York recommended that these workers not be added to the special exposure
Wanda L Munn cohort. NIOSH has access to adequate exposure monitoring and other
Richland, Washington information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with
John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. sufficient accuracy for members of this group. The Board concurs with
College Station, Texas this determination.
Robert W. Presi
Clinton, Tennessee Enclosed is supporting documentation from the recent Advisory Board
Genevieve 8. Roessler, Ph.D. Meeting held in Tampa, Florida where this potential class for the
Elysian, Minnesota special exposure cohort was discussed. If any of these items are

Phillip Schofield unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.
Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Sincerely,

STAFF: y= Cx. eee ma:

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY:

Christine M. Branch, Ph.D Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.
Washington, DC Chair

(COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT : Enc.

Zaida Burgos

Atlanta, Georgia
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5585 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5585

To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
                              Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2018

 Mr. Keating introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
                              Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE ADVISORY COMMISSION.

    Effective September 26, 2018, section 8(a) of Public Law 87-126 (16 
U.S.C. 459b-7(a)) is amended in the second sentence by striking 
``2018'' and inserting ``2028''.
                                 <all>
```
ARUN-EX 10.56-2014.7.31




Exhibit 10.56


CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


 [Aruba Networks Logo]


Amendment #8
to Avnet, Inc.
Distributor Agreement
This Amendment #8 to the Avnet Distributor Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of June 1, 2014 ("Effective Date") by and between Aruba Networks, Inc., having its principal place of business at 1344 Crossman Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 (“Aruba”), and Avnet, Inc., with an address at 2211 South 47th Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85034 (“Distributor”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, Aruba and Distributor entered into a Distributor Agreement dated June 15, 2007 (the "Agreement"); and as previously amended;
WHEREAS, Aruba and Distributor now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
A. In Exhibit A of the Agreement, entitled “PRODUCT & SERVICES DISCOUNTS”, the sentence as follows:
“**Standard Use Product Non Standard Pricing: (All non-standard deals must be approved by Supplier VP Channel Sales or General Manager of the Americas.): Discounts to be determined on a case by case basis.”
is hereby removed in its entirety and replaced with the following: “PRODUCT & SERVICES PRICING/DISCOUNTS
		
	•
	All Products: (Categories - MC, AP, IAP, MX, SW, HW, MR, MAS, CL, OT and ACC) 


		
	◦
	Non-Standard Pricing (NSP) - For Product being sold to Resellers using non-standard pricing agreed to between Aruba and Reseller, unless otherwise negotiated between Aruba and Distributor, Aruba will offer Distributor a discount equivalent of list price above the non-standard pricing being offered to the Reseller such that Distributor will earn a [***] gross margin.


B.This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.

*** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.




C.Except as provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective authorized representatives as of the Effective Date.


ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.                AVNET, INC.
By:     /s/ Ava Hahn         By:     /s/ Chuck Fries    
Print Name: Ava Hahn         Print Name: Chuck Fries    
Title: General Counsel        Title: VP Mat’ls    
Date: 5/28/2014        Date: 5/28/2014    



*** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 1750

In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:14

- cr - 00240

- BR

- 1 )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON , DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
William Scott Davis, Jr. , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1750 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr. , petitions for a writ of mandamus , seeking a new trial related to his criminal convictions and alleging fraud on the court in two long

- closed civil

cases
. We conclude that Davis is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamu s relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petit ioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Davis is not available by way of mandam us

— he may not use mandamus to challenge his criminal convictions or to evade prefiling injunctions entered by this court and the district court . Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts an d legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 21-1750 Doc: 16 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF STREICHER MOBILE FUELING, INC. AS OF JANUARY 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,848,000
<SECURITIES>                                   115,751
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,403,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,000
<INVENTORY>                                     76,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,648,021
<PP&E>                                       4,334,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                 966,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,402,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,152,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,935,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,402,970
<SALES>                                     33,844,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,844,969
<CGS>                                       31,458,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,458,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,646,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             432,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (661,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   232,551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (429,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (429,238)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.26)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This amended schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Company's audited financial statements as of and for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. Certain information has been amended in accordance with
Item 601(c)(2)(iii) of Regulation S-K, as described in footnote 1 below.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,356
<INVENTORY>                                     67,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,420
<PP&E>                                         155,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,763
<BONDS>                                        152,276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           569
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,341
<SALES>                                        495,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               495,733
<CGS>                                          258,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               195,650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,356
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,660
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,370
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,975)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
<FN>
         Total Current Liabilities and Cost of Tangible Goods Sold have been
amended to correct clerical errors in the original filing. This amended schedule
contains no change in previously reported information other than as described
above. The Company's audited financial statements as of and for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1998 did not contain these errors and are unchanged.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated February 13, 2004 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Decatur First Bank Group,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003.  We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
Decatur First Bank Group, Inc. on Form S-8, effective August 11, 2000 (file no.
33-43590),

                                        /S/ PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP



Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 2004



<PAGE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October

31 , 2019
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 18

- 00835

- CR

AMIT DINESH PATEL , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Be nd County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13

- DCR

- 064467

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Amit Dinesh Patel has signed and filed a written request to withdraw his notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not delivered an opinion, w e gra nt appellant’s request. Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the clerk of the court2

to issue the mandate of the court immediately.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer
Do Not Publish

– Tex. R. App. P. 4 7.2( b)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7209

EUGENE CREECH, a/k/a Willie James McCoullough,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-160-3-MJP)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Creech, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Creech appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for sentence reduction on the basis of his post-conviction

rehabilitation. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Creech v. United

States, No. CA-94-160-3-MJP (D.S.C. Aug. 16, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED