alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT  31.2**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Jeffrey A. Brodsky,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisreport for the period ended March 31, 2010 on Form 10-Q of AdelphiaRecovery Trust;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e))****for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,****the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

----

 

Date: May 7, 2010

 

By:  Quest Turnaround Advisors, LLC

as Trust Administrator ofthe Adelphia Recovery Trust

 
| /s/ Jeffrey A. Brodsky |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey  A. Brodsky    |   |
| Member                 |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Spectrum Brands, Inc.: 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-135274) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-39239, 333-41815, 333-42443, 333-68250, and 333-117567) on Forms S-8, of Spectrum Brands, Inc. of our reports dated December 14, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheets of Spectrum Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensiveincome (loss) and cash flows and the related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2007, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of September 30, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, which reports appear in the annual report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Brands, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 158, “*Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans*”, as of September 30, 2007. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Atlanta,Georgia 

December 14, 2007
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of Universal Solar Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wensheng Chen,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
14, 2009





/s/ Wensheng ChenWensheng
      Chen, Principal Executive
Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549


Re:      Arthur Andersen LLP

The financial statements of Syntroleum Corporation included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen").
Andersen has represented to us that the audit was subject to Andersen's quality
control system for the U.S. accounting and audit practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional
standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working
on the audit and availability of national office consultation and that
availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
the audit.

SYNTROLEUM CORPORATION



  /s/ Randall M. Thompson
-----------------------------------------------------
By:      Randall M. Thompson
         Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
         (Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MICHAEL SANFORD,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 403 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2014, The Request that the

Commonwealth's Informal Answer be Quashed and Vacated and the Petition for

Allowance of Appeal are hereby DENIED.
August 28, 2009 

 

 

The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius 

Secretary of Health and Human Services 

Department of Health and Human Services 

200 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20201 

Dear Madame Secretary: 

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

evaluated Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition-00128 concerning 

employees who worked at the Baker-Perkins Company in Saginaw, 

Michigan from May 14, 1956 to May 18, 1956. The National Institute 

for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has recommended that 

these workers not be added to the SEC. NIOSH has determined that it 

has access to adequate exposure monitoring and other information 

necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with sufficient 

accuracy for members of this group. The Board concurs with this 

determination. 

Enclosed is supporting documentation from the recent Advisory Board 

Meeting held in West Chester, Ohio July 27-29, 2009 where this 

potential class for the Special Exposure Cohort was discussed. If any 

of these items are unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly. 

Sincerely, 

 

 [Signature on file.] 

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. 

Chairman 

Enclosures 

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

Enc. 

CHAIRMAN:

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. 

 Lafayette, Indiana 

MEMBERS:

Josie Beach 

 Richland, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson 

 Rexburg, Idaho 

Michael H. Gibson 

 Franklin, Ohio 

Mark A. Griffon 

 Salem, New Hampshire 

James E. Lockey, M.D. 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

James M. Melius, M.D., Ph.D. 

 Albany, New York 

Wanda I. Munn 

 Richland, Washington 

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. 

 College Station, Texas 

Robert W. Presley 

 Seymore, Tennessee 

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D. 

 Elysian, Minnesota 

Phillip Schofield 

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico 

STAFF:

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY:

Theodore M. Katz, MPA 

 Atlanta, Georgia 

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT :

Zaida Burgos 

 Atlanta, Georgia
April 9, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EX PARTE WAYLAND HURST

NO. 14-12-01151-CR

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Filed 2/16/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2017 ND 32

Jacob Matthew Golberg, Appellant

v.

Director, North Dakota Department 

of Transportation, Appellee

No. 20160218

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Michael R. Hoffman, 120 North Third Street, Suite 100, P.O. Box 1056, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1056, for appellant; on brief.

Douglas B. Anderson, Office of Attorney General, 500 North Ninth Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for appellee; on brief.

Golberg v. N.D. Department of Transportation

No. 20160218

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Jacob Golberg appeals a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation order suspending his driving privileges for one year.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7); Beylund v. Levi, 2017 ND 30.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom, S.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

[¶3]The Honorable Jerod E. Tufte was not a member of the Court when this case was heard and did not participate in this decision.  Surrogate Judge Dale V. Sandstrom, sitting.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Excel Global, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Betty Soumekh
                                 ----------------------
                                 Betty Soumekh
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2010
EXHIBIT 32(a) - SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO)


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jackson Y. Dott, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/   Jackson Y. Dott
----------------------------
Jackson Y. Dott
Chief Executive Officer
September 14, 2004
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Meeting of the 

Weldon Spring Work Group 

13 September 2011 

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. Hebron, KY 41048 859-586-0166 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537 Participant Pass Code: 9933701 

9:00 a.m. Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

Work Group Discussion 

1. Brief review of the Weldon Spring Site (WSS) and WSS related documents – SC&A 

2. Summary of recent white papers and reports – SC&A

3. Summary of SEC issues and current status – SC&A

4. Discussion of open SEC issues – NIOSH and SC&A

• Issue #1: Data completeness (SC&A), whether a coworker model is needed

(NIOSH), and DWE accuracy (NIOSH)

• Issue #4: Radon/thoron – suggested NIOSH model (SC&A)

• Issue #5: Recycled uranium – use of 100 ppb (SC&A) 

• Issue #6: Neutrons – n/p taken from Fernald (SC&A) 

• Issue #8: the sufficiency of cohort monitoring re accidents/incidents (NIOSH)

• Issue #9: Geometry factors – from other DOE sites (NIOSH). 

5. As time permits, discussion of Site Profile issues - NIOSH and SC&A 

6. WG Chairperson - summary path forward for SEC-00143. 

Adjourn
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40312

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-495-1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jesus Rivera raises an 

argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 

F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and 

quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. The motion for 

summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40312 Document: 00513307517 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 8048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, 
Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 2 Avenue J, Bayonne, NJ 07002, has 
been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum 
products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in 
accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. 
anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and 
gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the 
entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. 
Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service 
this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#294a4b590745484b4158694d415a074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bddedfcd93d1dcdfd5ccfdd9d5ce93dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_
support/labs--scientific--svcs/commercial--gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 20, 
2007. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
September 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 08-589 Filed 2-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Dismissed; Opinion Filed July 1, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00154-CV

GARTH MCCREATH, Appellant

V.

CAPITOL STONEBRIAR, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-00272-2019

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Nowell

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard 

dated February 5, 2019, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant 

to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated February 5, 2019, we informed appellant 

the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the 

docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further

notice. By letter dated April 2, 2019, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification 

of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation 

appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days. We 
–2–

cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further 

notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or 

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

190154F.P05

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

GARTH MCCREATH, Appellant

No. 05-19-00154-CV V.

CAPITOL STONEBRIAR, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 6, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-00272-2019.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. 

Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee CAPITOL STONEBRIAR recover its costs of this appeal 

from appellant GARTH MCCREATH.

Judgment entered this 1st day of July, 2019.
##### 



Ex 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We have issued our reports
dated March 17, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of
Syntroleum Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Syntroleum Corporation on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-138487,
333-126459, 333-111716 and 333-62290) and on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-134386, 333-126427, 333-126425, 333-104360,
333-62862, 333-53714 and 333-64231).


/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP Tulsa, Oklahoma

March 17, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6260

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAWRENCE BERNARD GARRISON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00132-JCC-14; 1:01-cv-00647-JCC) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Bernard Garrison, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lawrence Bernard Garrison seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Garrison has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP 303 East Wacker Drive Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  August  12, 2010
/s/ Barbara J. Fournier

Barbara J. Fournier

Chief Operating Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)