alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF SPALDING HOLDINGS CORPORATION FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS RESTATED TO REFLECT THE
RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF THE COMPANY'S CHANGE IN METHOD OF VALUING U.S.
INVENTORIES FROM LIFO TO FIFO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  247,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,941)
<INVENTORY>                                    155,313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               426,867
<PP&E>                                         190,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 759,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           947
<OTHER-SE>                                   (173,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   770,416
<SALES>                                        850,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               850,179
<CGS>                                          560,179
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,503)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

June 7, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00274

- CV

In the Interest of D.L. III, D.L., D.A.R. and D.G. ,

From the 225th Judicial District Co urt, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00708 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Appellant’s brief was originally due on May 30, 201 9 , but has not been filed.

We ORDER appellant’s attorney to file appellant’s brief on or before June 27 , 2019 . If appellant’s brief is not filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the tr ial court for an abandonment hearing. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 107.013(a)(1) (giving indigent persons a right to counsel in parental

- rights termination cases); In re M.S. , 115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex. 2003) (holding that this right to counsel includes the ri ght to effective counsel).

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.1


 


PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION






FIRST AMENDMENT TO


RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT AGREEMENT

(Non-Assignable)


 


This First Amendment
to Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (this “Amendment”) is dated as of December 10, 2015, by and between Eric
Alexander (“Holder”) and Pershing Gold Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Corporation”).


 


A.           On
December 11, 2014, Holder and the Corporation entered into that certain Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”)
pursuant to which Holder was granted Five Thousand One (5,001) restricted shares (originally 90,000 shares on a pre-split basis)
(the “Shares”) of the Corporation’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.


 


B.           The Corporation
and Holder have agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.          Amendment
to Restricted Stock Grant Agreement. The Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 2 thereof and replacing it with the
following:


 


2.          Vesting
and Forfeiture. Participant shall vest in his or her rights under the Restricted Stock pursuant to the following schedule (each
date upon which vesting occurs being referred to herein as a “Vesting Date”):


 


	Date	 	Number
of 

Shares Vested
	 
	March 14, 2016	 	 	1,667	 
	December 11, 2016	 	 	1,667	 
	December 11, 2017	 	 	1,667	 



 


The foregoing notwithstanding, vesting pursuant to the foregoing schedule shall occur
on a Vesting Date only if Participant remains employed by or provides services to the Corporation from the Date of Grant to such
Vesting Date. If Participant ceases to be employed by or ceases to provide services to the Corporation at any time prior to the
final Vesting Date, pursuant to Section 6.1.3 of the Plan, all unvested Restricted Stock shall be forfeited immediately on the
date that Participant’s employment or service is terminated and the Participant shall have no further rights with respect
to such Restricted Stock.


 


2.          No
Other Changes. Except for the amendment contained in Section 1 hereof, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall
continue in full force and effect without any further amendments or changes.


 




    1 


     


    

 


3.          Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts each of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


4.          Governing
Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of
Nevada without reference to principles of conflicts of laws.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 




    2 


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.


 


	 	HOLDER:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Eric Alexander
	 	Eric Alexander
	 	 
	 	PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Stephen Alfers
	 	Name: Stephen Alfers
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board





 








    3
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By: 
Name:
    
    /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK

Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board of Directors,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    November 12, 2010
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: ADAM LEE,

Debtor,

______________________________

ADAM LEE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

DANE S. FIELD, Trustee,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-15108

D.C. No. 

1:15-cv-00472-SOM-BMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Susan O. Mollway, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2018** 

Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

FILED

MAY 7 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Chapter 7 debtor Adam Lee appeals the district court’s order dismissing as

moot Lee’s appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order approving a sale of real

property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1).

Lee concedes that, because he did not obtain a stay of the sale order, 11

U.S.C. § 363(m) bars him from undoing the sale in this appeal. See In re

Onouli-Kona Land Co., 846 F.2d 1170, 1171 (9th Cir. 1988). No exception to the

§ 363(m) mootness rule is applicable in this context. See In re Filtercorp, Inc., 163

F.3d 570, 576–77 (9th Cir. 1998).

We decline to exercise our discretion to grant the trustee’s request that we

impose sanctions on Lee.

AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Marshall Chadwell, certify that:


1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Monarch Services,
    Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
        those entities, particularly during the period in which this
        quarterly report is being prepared;

    b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
        end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
        and

    c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
        most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
        the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
        reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

    a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
        are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information.

    b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting.


/s/    MARSHALL CHADWELL

Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
Date:  December 12, 2003
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD

			PAGE 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0726

IN THE MATTER OF 

H.L.B.,

A Youth in Need of Care.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant in this matter shall file 

a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The 

response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney 

General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice 

of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Appellant at her last 

known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 22 2023

05/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0726
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roderick Macutay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of E-Dispatch Inc. for the fiscal quarter
ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of E-Dispatch Inc.


Date February 12, 2010                By: /s/ Roderick Macutay
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Roderick Macutay, President, Treasurer
                                          and Director Principal Executive and
                                          Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that E-Dispatch Inc. specifically
incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 41 (Friday, February 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 11126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Research on Women's Health.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee on Research on Women's 
Health.
    Date: March 17, 2008.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: Provide advice to the Office of Research on Women's 
Health (ORWH) on appropriate research activities with respect to 
women's health and related studies to be undertaken by the national 
research institutes; to provide recommendations regarding ORWH 
activities; to meet the mandates of the office; and for discussion 
of scientific issues.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center 
Drive, Conference Room 6, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Joyce Rudick, Director, Programs & Management, 
Office of Research on Women's Health, Office of the Director, 
National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Room 201, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301/402-1770.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.od.nih.gov/orwh/, where an agenda and any 
additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research Loan 
Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.232, Loan Repayment Program for Research Generally; 93.39, 
Academic Research Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired 
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan Repayment Program; 93.187, 
Undergraduate Scholarship Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged 
Backgrounds, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 21, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-888 Filed 2-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ERIC MUNOZ, 

Petitioner, 

 

v. Case No. 5D17-154

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed April 21, 2017

Petition Alleging Ineffectiveness

Of Appellate Counsel, 

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Eric Munoz, Crawfordville, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Samuel A. Perrone, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, 

for Respondent. 

 

PER CURIAM. 

Eric Munoz (the defendant) files a petition, alleging ineffective assistance of 

appellate counsel. Because the defendant's sentence is illegal and appellate counsel was 

ineffective for failing to file a motion challenging the sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), we grant the petition, in part.
2

The defendant was convicted and sentenced on multiple counts of delivery of 

cocaine within 1000 feet of a school and delivery of cannabis within 1000 feet of a school. 

The court imposed a general sentence of fifteen years in the Department of Corrections

followed by ten years' probation on all counts.

The defendant filed this petition which included allegations that appellate counsel 

was ineffective for failing to: 1) preserve and argue an illegal general sentence, and 2) 

argue that certain of the sentences exceed the statutory maximum. The State properly 

concedes that the defendant was entitled to receive relief on both claims.

The sentence on all the counts is an illegal general sentence. See Inclima v. State, 

570 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (finding sentence of twelve years' incarceration 

followed by eight years' probation to be a prohibited general sentence and in excess of 

statutory maximum where total time exceeded statutory maximum where counts involved 

combination of first and second-degree felonies). 

In addition, the general sentence is illegal for the delivery of cannabis convictions, 

as it exceeds the statutory maximum. A sentence in which the incarcerative portion and 

the probationary portion, when combined, exceed the statutory maximum is an illegal 

sentence. Wiskusky v. State, 707 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). The three counts of 

delivery of cannabis within 1000 feet of a school are second-degree felonies punishable 

by up to fifteen years in prison. §§ 775.082(3)(c), 893.13(1)(c)2, Fla. Stat. (2013). 

Accordingly, we grant the petition in part and remand for resentencing. We deny the 

defendant's other claims for relief.

DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED for resentencing.

PALMER, EVANDER, and EDWARDS,JJ., concur.
364 S.E.2d 778

#### Roger W. GOFF v. Cheryl A. GOFF.

No. 17141.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

April 15, 1987.

Dissenting Opinion July 14, 1987.

Charles A. Riffee, II, Thomas & Riffee, St. Albans, for appellant.

James A. Matish, Clarksburg, for appel-lee.

For opinion see: 177 W.Va. 742; 356 S.E.2d 496.

NEELY, Justice,

dissenting:

I dissent from the majority’s holding today because Roger Goff met part of his spousal and child support by providing housing in kind as he allowed his wife and children to live in the marital home rent free while he continued to make the mortgage payments. The divorce settlement stated that each spouse would pay half of the monthly $300 payment on the fifteen year mortgage on the marital home. However, Mrs. Goff and the children moved back into the marital home in 1983 and she has not paid any rent or her share of the monthly mortgage payments. This situation has burdened Mr. Goff by forcing him to pay double mortgage payments for four years and depriving him of potential income from renting the house to a third party. Accordingly, the circuit court had it within its discretion to enter an order modifying the appellee’s obligation to his former spouse and granting him credit of 27 months of fair rental value of $350.00 per month for Mrs. Goff’s free use of the jointly owned marital home.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ``Biodefense and Emerging 
Infectious Diseases Research Opportunities''.
    Date: March 5, 2008.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Room <greek-i>3129, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Eleazar Cohen, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 3129, 6700 B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-3564, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ceabadfff9b98ea0a7a6e0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bedbdd8f89c9fed0d7d690d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-579 Filed 2-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>