alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23.

                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                        ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

                                        

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Mastech Corporation:


  We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K, and have issued
our report thereon dated February 4, 1998.  Our audits were made for the purpose
of forming an opinion on those basic financial statements taken as a whole.  The
schedule listed in the index in Item 14(a) 2 of the Form 10-K is the
responsibility of the Company's management and is presented for purposes of
complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not a part
of the basic financial statements.  The schedule has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and,
in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data
required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole.



                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 4, 1998.



 
                              MASTECH CORPORATION
                 SCHEDULE II- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS


                             (Dollars in Thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Deductions-
                                                  Balance at     Charged to      Amounts      Balance at
                                                 Beginning of    Costs and     Deemed to be     End of
     Period Ended             Description           Period        Expenses    Uncollectible     Period
 
 
<S>                      <C>                     <C>            <C>          <C>              <C>
December 31, 1995        Allowance for
                           uncollectible accounts          $300         302           (102)      $  500
December 31, 1996        Allowance for
                           uncollectible accounts          $500         299           (124)      $  675
December 31, 1997        Allowance for
                           uncollectible accounts          $675         995           (630)      $1,040
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Green Earth Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, William J. Marshall, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Greg D. Adams, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: February 14, 2011

By:

/s/ William J. MarshallWilliam J. MarshallChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




Date: February 14, 2011

By:

/s/ Greg D. AdamsGreg D. AdamsChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


[A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
A Tribute to Phil Schofield 

On the occasion of Mr. Phillip Schofield’s long service on the Advisory Board of Radiation and 

Worker Health (“Board”), the staff of the Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

(DCAS) of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and John 

Howard, M.D., the Director of NIOSH, are all honored to pay tribute to Mr. Phillip Schofield for 

his long and distinguished service to the Board. 

Mr. Schofield was appointed to the Board by President George W. Bush in 2007. Prior to serving 

on the Board, Phil worked for Los Alamos National Laboratory for twenty-one years. His 

extensive understanding and experience in handling and processing of the radionuclides, 

Plutonium and Americium, greatly aided the Board’s work over his years. In his last five years at 

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Phil served as an Operations Center Specialist, running, and 

monitoring all systems at the (TA-55) plutonium facility. He also worked as a volunteer with the 

Los Alamos Project on Worker Safety. Throughout the Department of Energy’s (DOE) cold war 

history, few in any of the many DOE nuclear weapons complexes have faced, and understood the 

safety implications of, so many unique, exceptionally hazardous, radiation risks as he has. 

As a Board member, Phil always asked the questions that his fellow workers would have asked if 

they had a seat on the Board. Phil represented all atomic energy workers graciously and 

respectfully—he was dogged in his determination to pursue every avenue of radiation exposure 

for each claimant. 

For over a decade, the Board has benefitted from Phil’s dedication, professionalism, and 

collegial manner. The members of the Board gratefully thank Phil Schofield for his valuable 

service to the Board and to his fellow atomic weapons patriots. He has served the Board and the 

United States of America in an exemplary manner! 

This tribute is hereby adopted this 20th day of October 2022, at the 148th teleconference meeting 

of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000668 29-NOV-2018 10:19 AM
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00210-CR

IN RE Miguel Angel COLORADO NEVAREZ

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 31, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED AS MOOT

On March 6, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion 

to stay the underlying proceeding pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus, 

which this court granted in part on March 8, 2023. 

Relator’s mandamus petition argues the trial court failed to rule on his application for writ 

of habeas corpus and his motion to waive. Relator’s motion seeks to waive his required in-person 

attendance at a March 9, 2023 pretrial hearing. 

After relator filed this original proceeding, the trial court denied relator’s application for 

writ of habeas corpus. When the trial court ruled on his application for writ of habeas corpus, 

relator received the relief he sought through his mandamus petition, rendering his petition moot. 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11354CR, styled State of Texas v. Miguel Angel Colorado Nevarez, pending 

in the County Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth and the Honorable Susan D. 

Reed presiding.
04-23-00210-CR

- 2 -

See In re Bonilla, 424 S.W.3d 528, 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (orig. proceeding) (holding 

mandamus petition was moot where relator received relief sought). Additionally, because of the 

stay granted by this court, relator’s complaint about his required in-person attendance at the March 

9, 2023 pretrial hearing is also moot. See id. We, therefore, dismiss relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus and lift the stay we imposed on March 8, 2023.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Lapinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 15, 2011By:  /s/ Thomas LapinskiThomas LapinskiChief Executive Officer
To the Board of Directors of

Nuveen Dividend and Growth Fund:
In planning and performing our audit of the financial
statements of NUVEEN DIVIDEND AND GROWTH
FUND (one of the series constituting the Nuveen Taxable
Funds Inc. (a Maryland corporation)) for the year ended
June 30, 2000, we considered its internal control, including
control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to
determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, and not to
provide assurance on internal control.
The management of Nuveen Dividend and Growth Fund
is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal
control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls. Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entitys
 objective of preparing financial statements for external
purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.  Those controls
include the safeguarding of assets against unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition.
Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of
any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the
design and operation may deteriorate.
Our consideration of internal control would not
necessarily disclose all matters in internal control that
might be material weaknesses under standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control
components does not reduce to a relatively low level the
risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected
within a timely period by employees in the normal course
of performing their assigned functions.  However, we
noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities,
that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of June 30, 2000.
This report is intended solely for the information and use
of management and the Board of Directors of Nuveen
Dividend and Growth Fund and the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Chicago, Illinois
August 23, 2000
| **Commitments And Contingencies (Details)** | 1 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| December 2012 Securities Litigation         |           |
| **Loss Contingencies [Line Items]**         |           |
| Number of cases consolidated                | 2              |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of cases consolidated
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**stj_Numberofcasesconsolidated**Namespace Prefix:**stj_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_LossContingenciesLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_LitigationCaseAxis=stj_December2012SecuritiesLitigationMember**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Sino Green Land Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Xiong Luo, chief executive officer of the Company, and Huasong Sheena Shen, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





October 27, 2010
/s/ Xiong LuoXiong LuoChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)





/s/ Huasong Sheena ShenOctober 27, 2010
Huasong Sheena ShenChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sino Green Land Corporation and will be retained by Sino Green Land Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Henry Earl Taylor v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 11

- 00052

- CR

Trial court case number: 1066968

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing asserting that this court has jurisdiction over

his appeal. Appellant is ordered to file a written declaration made under penalty of perjury

attesting to the facts surrounding the filing of his notice of appeal

. The declaration should

specify when and how appellant filed h is notice of appeal and should include any other facts

relevant to the issue of whether appellant ’s n o tice of appeal was timely filed. Appellant’s

declaration shall be filed by Friday

, Septem ber 21, 2012

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 20, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting and briefing.

# DATE AND TIME:

Friday, March 7; 9:30 a.m. 

      ( print page 11093)    

# PLACE:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425. 

## Meeting Agenda 

I. Approval of Agenda 

II. Approval of Minutes 
      - December 3 Meeting
      - January 11 Meeting
      - February 8 Meeting

III. Announcements 

IV. Staff Director's Report 
      - Report on Lean Six Sigma Process

V. Management and Operations 
      - Reporting of Commissioner Appointment Status
      - Status of FY 2008 Budget
      - Status of FY 2009 Budget

VI. Program Planning 
      - Briefing Report on Racial Categorization in the Census
      - Proposed Changes to 2008 Briefing Schedule
      - Proposed Changes to 2009 Briefing Schedule
      - 2010 Program Planning Proposals

VII. State Advisory Committee Issues 
      - Ohio SAC
      - New Jersey SAC
      - Rhode Island SAC
      - Texas SAC
      - Vermont SAC

VIII. Future Agenda Items 

IX. Adjourn 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8582. 

Dated: February 26, 2008. 

David Blackwood, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 08-913 Filed 2-26-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement

for

Members of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (Board) is very concerned with 

maintaining the transparency of the compensation program created by the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA). In an 

effort to foster a fully open and honest environment for claimants and in order to allay 

any concerns within the stakeholder community regarding perceived or actual conflicts 

of interest for Board members, the Board releases the following information for its 

Members: 

Board Member’s Name: David Pompa

Job Title and Current Employer: Nuclear Weapons Worker and Union Representative

Past President/Chairperson Amarillo Health 

Consortium (Retired)

Amarillo, TX

Biographical Information: Mr. Pompa worked at the United States Department of 

Energy’s Pantex Plant from March 1980 up until his official retirement in June 2021. Mr. 

Pompa possesses over 41 years of unique nuclear worker’s experience, expertise, and 

perspective from his various job assignments at the Pantex Plant. He was a long-time 

and well-respected Union representative during his career at the Pantex Plant. In this 

role, Mr. Pompa represented workers on a wide variety of issues including complex 

safety and health matters. Mr. Pompa was President/Chairperson for the Amarillo 

Health Consortium, an initiative that focused on assisting current and former nuclear 

workers with their health issues.

Expert Witness Experience: N/A

DOE/AWE Sites Where a Conflict of Interest Exists: Pantex Plant; DOE/AWE sites for 

which International Machines and Aerospace Workers Union (Local 1255) or International 

Union of Operating Engineers (Local 340) may advocate for inclusion in the Special Exposure 

Cohort (SEC).

Subject Matters Where a Conflict of Interest Exists: Specific party matters involving 

SEC petitions or dose reconstruction claims advocated or represented by International 

Machines and Aerospace Workers Union (Local 1255) or International Union of Operating 

Engineers (Local 340).
Conflicted Sites/Subject Matters Regarding Which the Board Member Has Received 

Permission to Participate: Mr. Pompa has not received permission to participate in 

specific party matters involving the abovementioned conflict of interest concerns.