alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6507

AARON B. ROBERTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COREY WALKER, CCMSII; R. EBERSOLE, Lt.; A. HARTLE, COMSII; 

R. DUDLEY, Sgt.; JACQUELENE A. SHANK, COMM; R. WISE, Capt.;

MAJ. REINHARDT; B. REED, Lt.; SCOTT PETERSON, Det. Sgt.; 

TINA M. STUMP; RODERICK R. SOWERS; JOSEPH M. PERRY; JOHN 

FOUNTAIN; GARY D. MAYNARD; GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, c/o DPSCS; 

DONI OBITTS; K. EASTON, CCMSII; RANDALL WATSON; SCOTT S. 

OAKLEY, Director of the DPSCS Inmate Grievance Office; 

WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

DOCTOR LIN QUILLO; DOCTOR KEVEN JOHNSON; RN MICHELLE AUTREY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. 

(1:14-cv-00720-GLR)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Aaron B. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Dorianne Avery Meloy, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; 

Elizabeth Erin Pavlick, Carolyn Israel Stein, BONNER, KIERNAN, 

TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Aaron B. Roberts appeals the district court’s order 

granting Defendants summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

order. Roberts v. Walker, No. 1:14-cv-00720-GLR (D. Md. Mar. 4, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vera Vechera, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Midex Gold Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                     By: /s/ Vera Vechera
                                        ------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Vera Vechera
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                     Date: August 19, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5826 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5826

To amend the Combat Duty Pay Act of 1952 to require that former members 
  of the uniformed services who were captured or entered a missing-in-
  action status during the Korean War while serving as a member of a 
   combat unit in Korea receive combat pay for each month spent in a 
captured or missing-in-action status, rather than just a total of four 
                                months.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2018

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Combat Duty Pay Act of 1952 to require that former members 
  of the uniformed services who were captured or entered a missing-in-
  action status during the Korean War while serving as a member of a 
   combat unit in Korea receive combat pay for each month spent in a 
captured or missing-in-action status, rather than just a total of four 
                                months.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Never Forgotten Korean War POW 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF ENTIRE PERIOD SPENT IN A CAPTURED OR MISSING-IN-
              ACTION STATUS DURING THE KOREAN WAR FOR RECEIPT OF COMBAT 
              PAY.

    (a) In General.--Section 704(b) of the Combat Duty Pay Act of 1952 
(title VII of Department of Defense Appropriation Act, 1953; 66 Stat. 
539) is amended by striking ``for not more than three months 
thereafter'' and inserting ``for each month thereafter''.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--
            (1) Covered persons.--Section 704(b) of the Combat Duty Pay 
        Act of 1952, as amended by subsection (a), applies only with 
        respect to a former member of the uniformed services who 
        received combat pay under such section and who is alive as of 
        the date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Combat pay amount.--In determining the actual amount to 
        be paid to a former member of the uniformed services covered by 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall increase the 
        amount determined under section 704(b) of the Combat Duty Pay 
        Act of 1952, as amended by subsection (a), using an appropriate 
        inflation adjustment.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7762

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER CUNNINGHAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:14-cr-00225-LMB-1; 1:15-cv-01262-LMB)

Submitted: March 31, 2016 Decided: April 11, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Golder, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Cunningham seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Cunningham has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1107 QIAN FAN, a/k/a Kunio Otsuka, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-997-923) Submitted: May 20, 2005 Decided: June 13, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Qian Fan, Petitioner Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Carol Federighi, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Qian Fan, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Fan’s second, identical motion to reopen. We agree with the Board that the motion should be construed as Fan’s second motion to reconsider. As such, it exceeds the number limitations of 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(5)(A) (2000) and 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2) (2005). Even construing the motion as a motion to reopen, it is beyond the ninety-day deadline of 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(6)(C)(i) (2000) and 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2005). Therefore, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2005); INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Stewart v. INS , 181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir. 1999). We deny the petition for review; we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         354,116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  825,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,408
<INVENTORY>                                    526,665
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,999,979
<PP&E>                                       6,703,783
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,348,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,992,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,543,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,197
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,026,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,972,470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,610,256
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,825,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,649,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                72,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,561
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 51,550
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Eltek Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amnon Shemer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)            The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Amnon Shemer*


Amnon Shemer


Vice President, Finance


and Chief Financial Officer





May 13, 2010




*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-10827

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:19-cr-60344-RKA-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ROGENIOR PIERRE PAUL, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(May 17, 2021)

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Sclafani, appointed counsel for Rogenior Paul in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Paul and filed a brief 

USCA11 Case: 20-10827 Date Filed: 05/17/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of 

the entire record reveals that Sclafani’s assessment of the relative merit of the 

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no 

arguable issues of merit, Sclafani’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Paul’s 

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 20-10827 Date Filed: 05/17/2021 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 21.1



                         Mobius Management Systems, Inc.
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant




                                                    State or Other Jurisdiction
Registrant                                          of Incorporation
----------                                          ----------------
Mobius Management Systems, Inc.                     Delaware


Subsidiaries of the Registrant
------------------------------
MMS Acquisition I LLC                               Delaware
Mobius Management Systems (Canada) LLC              Delaware
Mobius Management Systems (UK) Ltd.                 United Kingdom
Mobius Management Systems (Canada), Inc.            Canada
Mobius Management Systems (France) S.a.r.l.         France
Mobius Management Systems (Deutschland) GmbH        Germany
Mobius Management Systems (Italy) S.r.l.            Italy
Mobi Management Systems Sweden AB                   Sweden
Mobius Management Systems (Australia) PTY LTD       Australia
Mobius Management Systems (Switzerland) GmbH        Switzerland
Mobius Management Systems (Japan) K.K.              Japan
Mobius Management Systems (Benelux) B.V.            Benelux
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

Tennessee Valley Authority (Meeting No. 08-01). 

# Time and Date: 

11 a.m. EST, February 15, 2008, TVA Chattanooga Office Complex, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee. 

## Agenda 

### Old Business 

Approval of minutes of November 29, 2007, Board Meeting. 

### New Business 

1. Chairman's Report

A. Ad Hoc Committee on energy efficiency, demand response, and renewable energy

B. Report on committee memberships

2. President's Report

3. Report of the Finance, Strategy, and Rates Committee

C. Customer issues

i. Rate adjustment 

ii. Renewable portfolio compliance for customers

iii. Seven States (customer-owned generation)

4. Report of the Operations, Environment, and Safety Committee

A. Radiological waste processing contract

5. Report of the Audit and Ethics Committee

6. Report of the Community Relations Committee

A. Appointment to Regional Resource Stewardship Council

7. Report of the Corporate Governance Committee

A. Amendments to TVA Bylaws

B. TVA Board Practice on Approval of Settlements of Claims and Litigation

C. TVA Board Practice on Board Member Continuing Education Opportunities 

D. Election of Chair

8. Ike Zeringue Engineer of the Year Award.

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000,                               ( print page 8391)                            Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan to attend the meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.                     

Dated: February 8, 2008. 

Ralph E. Rodgers, 

Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 08-676 Filed 2-11-08; 9:49 am] 

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
Exhibit 13.2


                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Annual Report of Knightsbridge Tankers Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, the Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: April 27,  2007

/s/ Kate Blankenship
------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.3

 


	
 
    	
 
    	
BEIGENE, LTD.
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
NUMBER
    	
 
    	
INCORPORATED IN THE CAYMAN   ISLANDS UNDER THE COMPANIES LAW
    	
 
    	
ORDINARY 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
(AS AMENDED OR REVISED FROM TIME   TO TIME)
    	
 
    	
SHARES
    
	
[certificate no.]
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
[no. of shares]
    




 

THIS CERTIFIES THAT [name of shareholder] is the registered holder of [no. of shares] ordinary shares of par value [par value] each in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof.

 

EXECUTED on behalf of the Company this      day of                2015

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
Director
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00354-CV

JAMAYALL RICHARD, Appellant

V.

MARCELA AYALA AND MOISES AYALA, Appellees

Appeal from the 269th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011-43986).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on January 

31, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial court’s 

judgment finding the defendants, Marcela Ayala and Moises Ayala, liable but awarding 

no damages. Accordingly, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and remands

the case to the trial court for a new trial.

The Court orders that appellees, Marcela Ayala and Moises Ayala, jointly and 

severally, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered November 10, 2015.
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Brown.
|   | (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bergio International, Inc. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                         |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 12, 2010 | By:    |  /s/ Berge Abajian |   |
|                    |   | Berge Abajian                |   |
|                    |   | Principal Accounting Officer |   |