alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
/

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-1121-14 & PD-1122-14

MARCUS LEE JEFFERSON, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM

THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Abel Acosta, Clerk

^ RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MAR 03 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
Motion for extension oftime

Appellant failed to file copies of petition for discretionary review as

required. Petition did not contain a copyofthe opinion ofthe courtof appeals.

Appellant, Marcus Lee Jefferson, hasfile a Motion for Extension of Time

of 30 days to complete necessary Order given: IN THE COURT OF

CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

This motion is not made for the purpose ofdelay,

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED,

Appellant prays thatthisHonorable Court grants the extension of time to complete

the order ofthe Criminal Court of Appeals.

Respectfully,

Marcus Lee Jefferson

19822 River Breeze Dr.

Tomball, Texas 77375

PH. 281.773.1448

March 2, 2015
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 00-4297



# 
A NTHONY B ONNER , a/k/a Tone,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.

(CR-98-424) Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: March 2, 2001 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Anton J. S. Keating, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Angela R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Anthony Bonner pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine and crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West 1999). The district court sentenced Bonner toa 122-month prison sentence to be followed by five years of supervised release. Bonner appeals, challenging the calculation of his criminal history category. He asserts that the district court clearly erred in finding that he committed the instant offense while on probation for a state conviction, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.1(d) (1998), and that the instant offense occurred less than two years after his release from confinement. See USSG § 4A1.1(e). The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that Bonner waived his right to appeal. We grant the Government’s motion and dismiss the appeal.In his plea agreement, Bonner waived the right to appeal any sentence imposed, including any issues that relate to the establishment of the guideline range, reserving only the right to appeal an upward or downward departure. The district court accepted Bonner’s guilty plea at a hearing conducted in accordance with Rule 11 of the FederalRules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed Bonner’s plea agreement and the Rule 11 colloquy and find that Bonner made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal. United States v. Broughton-Jones , 71 F.3d 1143, 1146 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing standard). Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B ONNER
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5995 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5995

   To prohibit the National Endowment for the Arts to make grants to 
 demonstrate how artists work to show the impact of climate change in 
 the San Francisco bay area and how works of art can inform, inspire, 
                    and empower communities at risk.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 1, 2018

  Mr. Norman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the National Endowment for the Arts to make grants to 
 demonstrate how artists work to show the impact of climate change in 
 the San Francisco bay area and how works of art can inform, inspire, 
                    and empower communities at risk.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    None of the funds available to the National Endowment for the Arts 
may be used to make grants to demonstrate how artists work to show the 
impact of climate change in the San Francisco bay area and how works of 
art can inform, inspire, and empower communities at risk.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on October 1, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2371

MIMMI KIFLE SHEWAGA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A78-610-711)

Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: May 17, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler,

Assistant Attorney General, Norah Ascoli Schwartz, Senior

Litigation Counsel, John S. Hogan, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*The immigration judge and the BIA denied relief under the

United Nations’ Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) in their

respective decisions. However, as the Government correctly notes,

Shewaga never applied for protection under CAT during her

litigation below, nor does she raise any substantive claim on

appeal. Accordingly, we consider only the denial of her

applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mimmi Kifle Shewaga, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

decision affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s denial of

her applications for asylum and withholding of removal.*

On appeal, Shewaga raises challenges to the immigration

judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility

for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying

eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he

presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could

fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v.

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the

evidence of record and conclude that Shewaga fails to show that the

evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant

the relief that Shewaga seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of

Shewaga’s request for withholding of removal. The standard for

withholding of removal is more stringent than that for granting

asylum. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). To

qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate
- 3 -

“a clear probability of persecution.” INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480

U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Because Shewaga fails to show that she is

eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
Template Software, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-24873) of our report dated 
January 8, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of 
Template Software, Inc. as of November 30, 1996 and 1997 and for each of the 
three years in the period ended November 30, 1997, which report is included in 
the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                        Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


McLean, Virginia
March 2, 1998
EXHIBIT 23




<PAGE>




           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by Reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-109617) of Energas Resources, Inc. of our
report dated June 7, 2007 related to the financial statements which appear in
Energas Resources, Inc. Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended January 31, 2007.



/s/ Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP

Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 28, 2008






















<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4449-4450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29264; Airspace Docket No. 07-AEA-04]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; Tappahannock, VA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
that establishes a Class E airspace area to support Area Navigation 
(RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Instrument Approach 
Procedures (SIAPs) that serve Tappahannock-Essex County Airport, 
Tappahannock, VA.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 20, 2007. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual 
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daryl Daniels, Airspace Specialist, 
System Support, AJO2-E2B.12, FAA Eastern Service Center, 1701 Columbia 
Ave., College Park, GA 30337; telephone (404) 305-5581; fax (404) 305-
5572.

[[Page 4450]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on October 30, 2007 (72 61294-61296). 
The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non 
controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse 
public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no 
adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on December 20, 2007. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms the effective date.

    Issued in College Park, GA on December 17, 2007.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, System Support Group, Eastern Service Center.
[FR Doc. 08-207 Filed 1-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
                                      EXHIBIT 27
                                        
Article 5

The  schedule  contains  summary financial information  extracted  from  Monarch
Avalon,  Inc.'s unaudited financial statements for the period ended January  31,
1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Apr-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              May-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                Jan-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2,014
<SECURITIES>                                        128
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                        307
<INVENTORY>                                       2,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5,894
<PP&E>                                            4,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,420
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            527
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6,463
<SALES>                                           2,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,351
<CGS>                                             1,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     333
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 333
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        333
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .21
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of
SunValley Solar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Zhijian James Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Mandy Chung
, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/ Zhijian James Zhang                                              
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Zhijian James Zhang                                                  
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director
|Date:  | August 20, 2012                                                      





















|By:    | /s/ Mandy Chung            
|------ | ---------------------------
|Name:  | Mandy Chung                
|Title: | Principal Financial Officer
|Date:  | August 20, 2012            





















This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Lapinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 14, 2012By:  /s/ Thomas LapinskiThomas LapinskiChief Executive Officer (Principal Financial Officer)   The foregoing certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, April 7, 2008, 8 a.m. to April 7, 5 p.m., Gaithersburg Hilton, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD, 20877 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 15, 2008, 73FR8886-8887.                

This notice is amended to change the name from “Biosensors for Early Cancer Detection & Risk Assessment/Novel & Improved Methods to Measure Cancer Epigenetic Biomarkers” to “Biosensors/Cancer Epigenetic Biomarkers”. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 25, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 08-908 Filed 2-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5771 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 

charitable contributions as an above-the-line deduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2018 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

deduction for charitable contributions as an above-theline deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charitable Giving Tax 

5 Deduction Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5771 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS AL2 LOWED IN DETERMINING ADJUSTED GROSS 

3 INCOME. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 62(a) of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after para6 graph (7) the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(8) CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.—The de8 duction allowed under section 170.’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

10 170(b)(1)(H) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘(com11 puted without regard to any net operating loss carryback 

12 to the taxable year under section 172).’’ and inserting the 

13 following: ‘‘determined without regard to— 

14 ‘‘(i) section 62(a)(8), and 

15 ‘‘(ii) any net operating loss carryback 

16 to the taxable year under section 172.’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Signatures                   |   | Title                           |   | Date               |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                         |   |                            |   |               |
| /s/ James WinsorJames Winsor |   | Chief Executive OfficerDirector |   | September 24, 2010 |

----
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD

- 0063

- 20

KENNETH DWAYNE ANDERSON , App ellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

MCLENNAN COUNTY

Y EARY , J., filed a dissenting opinion in which S LAUGHTER , J., joined

.

DISSENTING OPINION

For the reasons set out in my dissenting opinion in Dulin v. State , ___ S.W.3d ___,

No s . PD

- 0856

- 19 & PD

- 1857

- 19 , 2021 WL 1202400 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021), I

respectfully dissent to the Court’s disposition of the State’s petition for discretionary

review.

FIL ED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH