alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, Wisconsin

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

Michael H. Gibson

 Franklin, Ohio

Mark A. Griffon

 Salem, New Hampshire

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

Robert W. Presley

 Seymour, Tennessee

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

September 14, 2011

The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Madam Secretary:

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has evaluated 

Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00126 concerning employees who 

worked at the Piqua Organic Moderated Reactor, in Piqua, Ohio, under the 

statutory requirements established by the Energy Employees Occupational 

Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA) and incorporated into 

42 CFR Sec. 83.13. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

(NIOSH) has recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for 

all employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their 

contractors and subcontractors who worked in any location at the Piqua Organic 

Moderated Reactor during the operational period from January 1, 1963 through 

May 1, 1966.

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and other 

information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with sufficient 

accuracy for members of this group, and therefore a class covering this group 

should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs with this determination.

Enclosed is supporting documentation from the August 23-25, 2011, Board 

meeting held in Richland, Washington, and earlier meetings where this potential 

class for the SEC was discussed. If any of these items are unavailable at this 

time, they will follow shortly. 

 Sincerely,

 [Signature on file]

 

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH

 Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Eltek Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Arieh Reichart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/Arieh Reichart*
Arieh ReichartChief Executive Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

June 28, 2006

*     The
originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys
offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.



---

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgeworth Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for three month period ended June 30, 2012
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, G.J. de Klerk, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

       1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 23, 2012

                                         By:  /s/ G.J. de Klerk
                                              -------------------------------
                                              G.J. de Klerk
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act), I, John B. Holmes, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Syntroleum Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge:



(1) The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 16, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ John B. Holmes, Jr.              
|                      |  |  |  | John B. Holmes, Jr.                  
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. section1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Henry County Plywood Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Friess, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



BY(Signature)                         /s/ Michael Friess
(Name and Title)                      Michael Friess, Chairman of the Board,
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

(Date)                                September 24, 2008











                                       13
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5953 

To provide regulatory relief to charitable organizations that provide housing 

assistance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2018 

Mr. LOUDERMILK (for himself and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide regulatory relief to charitable organizations that 

provide housing assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Building Up Independent Lives and Dreams Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘BUILD Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5953 IH

1 SEC. 2. MORTGAGE LOAN TRANSACTION DISCLOSURE RE2 QUIREMENTS. 

3 (a) TILA AMENDMENT.—Section 105 of the Truth 

4 in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1604) is amended by inserting 

5 after subsection (d) the following: 

6 ‘‘(e) DISCLOSURE FOR CHARITABLE MORTGAGE

7 LOAN TRANSACTIONS.—With respect to a mortgage loan 

8 transaction involving a residential mortgage loan offered 

9 at zero percent interest primarily for charitable purposes 

10 by an organization having tax-exempt status under section 

11 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, forms 

12 HUD–1 and GFE (as defined under section 1024.2(b) of 

13 title 12, Code of Federal Regulations), together with a dis14 closure substantially in the form of the Loan Model Form 

15 H–2 (as defined under Appendix H to section 1026 of title 

16 12, Code of Federal Regulations) shall, collectively, be an 

17 appropriate model form for purposes of subsection (b).’’. 

18 (b) RESPA AMENDMENT.—Section 4 of the Real Es19 tate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2603) 

20 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(d) With respect to a mortgage loan transaction in22 volving a residential mortgage loan offered at zero percent 

23 interest primarily for charitable purposes, an organization 

24 having tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the 

25 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 may use forms HUD–1 

26 and GFE (as defined under section 1024.2(b) of title 12, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5953 IH

1 Code of Federal Regulations) together with a disclosure 

2 substantially in the form of the Loan Model Form H–2 

3 (as defined under Appendix H to section 1026 of title 12, 

4 Code of Federal Regulations), collectively, in lieu of the 

5 disclosure published under subsection (a).’’. 

6 (c) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the 

8 Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection shall issue such 

9 regulations as may be necessary to implement the amend10 ments made by subsections (a) and (b). 

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect on the date of 

13 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S
N O . A P - 7 6 , 4 9 0

E X P A R T E R I C A R D O R A M O S , J R . , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O . 0 7 - 0 3 - 0 6 0 1 6 - M C R A J A I N T H E 3 6 5 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T

F R O M M A V E R I C K C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y o u n g , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burg l ar y o f a habitation and sentenc ed to nine y ear s’ of community supervision. Applicant subsequently pleade d true to a motion to revo ke and was sentenc ed to nine y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his ple a of “true ” to the motion to revoke was involuntary beca use it was predic ated on the possibili ty of “shock probation,” and he was not broug ht back to Maver ick2

County while the trial court still had jurisdiction to consider “shock probation.” Counsel did not file

nece ssary motions to have applicant considere d for “shock probation” while the trial court still had jurisdiction under Section 6 of Article 42.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedur e. We rema nded this application to the trial c ourt for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law

. Trial counsel filed an aff

idavit with the trial court. Ba s ed on that aff idavit, the trial court d et er m ined that plea of true to motion to revoke was rende red involuntary by counse l ’s ineffe ctiveness. Applicant is entitled to relief

. Ex parte Huerta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). Re li e f is g r a

n te d

. The judgme nt revoking community supervision in Caus e N o . 0 7

- 0 3

- 0 6 0 1 6

- MCRAJ A in t h e 365 J udicial District Court of Maver ick County is set aside, and Applicant is t h

rema nded to t h e custody of the sheriff of Maver ick County to answe r the alleg ations as set out in State’s Application to Revoke Community Supervision. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Crim in a l Ju s ti c e

– Co r r e c ti onal I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Fe bruar

y 2, 2011 Do Not Publish
Ex. 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 20-F of  Knightsbridge  Tankers
Limited;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 12, 2003


/s/ Kate Blankenship

Kate Blankenship

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5963 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5963

    To delay the reimposition of the annual fee on health insurance 
                      providers until after 2020.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2018

   Mrs. Noem (for herself, Mrs. Walorski, Ms. Sinema, and Mr. Bera) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
    Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To delay the reimposition of the annual fee on health insurance 
                      providers until after 2020.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELAY OF REIMPOSITION OF ANNUAL FEE ON HEALTH INSURANCE 
              PROVIDERS UNTIL AFTER 2020.

    (a) In General.--Section 9010(j)(3) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act is amended by striking ``December 31, 2019'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2020''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to calendar years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Work Group on TBD-6000

October 11, 2013

10:30 a.m. Eastern Time, Teleconference

Conference Phone: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Code: 9933701#

AGENDA

1. Welcome and roll call

2. TBD 6000, Rev 01

a. Presentation of DCAS August 2013 White Paper: “Determination of 

Settling Time”

b. SC&A review

c. Work Group discussion/recommendations

3. GSI 

a. Presentation of DCAS August 2013 White Paper: “Summary Doses for 

GSI”)

b. SC&A review

c. Disposition of Appendix BB issues

d. Public comments and submissions

e. Work Group discussion/recommendations

f. Preparing a WG report for October Board meeting

4. Adjourn
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40187 Conference Calendar

JAMES BEROTTE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:98-CV-1926

- - - - - - - - - - December 13, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Berotte, Texas prisoner # 641970, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the forfeiture of previously earned good-time credits upon the revocation of his parole. He argues that this forfeiture violates the Ex Post Facto Clause and seeks restoration of the forfeited good-time credits. A certificate of appealability was previously granted.No. 99-40187 -2- The respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the action as moot due to Berotte’s re-release on parole. This argument is meritorious. Berotte has not shown an injury-in-fact, and his habeas claims are moot due to his re-release on parole. Spencer
v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); see Ex parte Hallmark , 883 S.W.2d 672, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (good-time credits apply only to an inmate’s eligibility for parole or mandatory supervision and do not affect the length of the inmate’s sentence). Therefore, respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Empire Asia Resources Corp.
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 /s/ William Tay
                                 ----------------------------
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: October 27, 2009